‘Veurrence more then I do. y~ MD tiem... satire wmmmamiitr tani | Ledger is for sale, the proprietor having. 4 lost the: use of his right hand>—The Letter From Genéral Pack- ard. Laportn, Ind., June 15, 1868. C. G. Powrit, Esq.—Dear Sir.—From the last two numbers of the Michigan City @nierprise, it seems that a misunder- standing has existed in xeference to my supposed declination of the candidacy for Congress. No one can regret the oc- I suppose that it igs now understood that the error arose from a conversation between you and myself; yet I deem it but just to my- self, and to ail the parties concerned, that I should make a brief statement. of the facts. When the conversation which led to the misunderstanding between us’ oc= curred, I had not fully made up my mind to be 3 candidate. As early a3 February last, I was in receipt of letters from va- rious parts of the Disirict, giving me, unsolicited agsurances of support, should I be a candidate. Still I wag un- decided, not feeling certain that my chances were sufficiently favorable to warrant me in making the race. “On the Monday evening following our. County. Convention, I received letters which ena- bied me to say positively that I would go before the Convention. This was pre- vious to any positive knowledge that Mr. Cathcart would be a candidate, bui. after there were current reports to that effect. While my mind was thus. undecided, the conversation with you occurred.— We had heard the reports that Mr. Cath- cart would be «candidate. T expressed the desire to know whether or not the reports were true; and it w: between us that you write a | My sole object was that I might have the | truth before my mind in determining my | own future course; and it Ke ‘Once OC- ( LO -anything more would be written, than a simple inquiry as to the truth of the reports. That you had a different understanding I have no doubt,. yet I know that such a construc- tion was wholly foreign to my intentions. Hence my letter to Mr. Jernegan, of the 6th inst. My first impression was that some person had maliciously mis-inform- ed him; and hence [ made 2 positive de- nial of the statement, for I was not con- ‘scious thén, nor am I now conscious, of having given authority for the contents of your letter to Mr. Cathcart. The in- ference drawn by you from my language, must have arisen from the uncertainty I felfin regard to the matter; and per- haps-a previously formed opinioa of your Own as to my probable coursé. - [trust this will be accepted as a full explanation.. I make no charge on any ‘one. Ido not believe any one hag in- tentionally. done wrong. I believe all, have acted in good faith. Itis simply a misunderstanding. There let us leave it. ‘Very t ruly yours, : * JasPeR PACKARD. ~ Tam satisfied by the way that Gen. Packard has treated this matter from the’ commencement. aud from his statement ‘| made of the conversation alluded to, that ‘| 7 saw bin next, afew days after the said- conversation, be informed me that he had concluded to be a candidate, and should endeavor ro secure the nomina- tion.” T spoke of the letrer I had written” to Mr. Catbeart, to which he made no reply. I bowever wa3 going to West- | ville on Friday, and@ thought I would) meet Mr. Catheart there and inform him of the General’s purposes. but did not see him as I had expected, and the first thing I did on Saturday morning after my re- turn, was to write him by mail.