-__.. -————-—*—v————_ v- v, .w- _
I .

THE COMMERCIAL-POLICY OF
WILLlAM CECIL LORD BURGHLEY

' Thesis for the Degm of M. A.-
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY

Reynold Richardson Jeltema
195.8

 

‘."'.
.‘..; .0.

L

3!.“

THE COMMERCIAL POLICY OF WILLIAM CECIL LORD BURGHLEY

by

Reynold Richardson Jeltema

AN ABSTRACT

Submitted to the College of Science and Arts
Michigan State University of Agriculture and
Applied Science in partial fulfillment of

the requirements for the degree of

MASTER OF ARTS

Department of History

1958

452%; ¢,M.\

Approved

 

REYNOLD RICHARDSON JELTEMA ABSTRACT

The commercial activities of the English people in
Elizabethan times have been labeled "mercantilist" by most
economic historians. As William Cecil, Lord Burghley,
Secretary in the Privy Council and later Treasurer, was
the chief architect of Elizabethan commercial policy, he
has been called a "mercantilist" by these same historians.
To have done so is to have erred, for in calling Cecil a
'"mercantilist" these historians have not paid close
attention to Cecil's motives for his activities. They
explain his means but they miss his ends. In so doing
they do not see the true purpose of his activities. They
have given scant attention to the social and political
forces which were the considerations that shaped Cecil‘s
policy.

It is the purpose of this essay to demonstrate that
Cecil was not a'"mercantilist;" This will be accomplished
by close examination of the international political events
between the years 1568 and 1574 which impinged upon
England's commercial activities. It will be shown that as
Cecil exercised great influence and control over these
activities he often subordinated them to political consid-
erations of a more pressing nature.

0 This was a time when England was threatened by the
internal revolt of forces allied with nations hostile to

her; when the champion of the Counter Reformation, Philip II

IREYNOLD RICHARDSON JELTEMA ABSTRACT

of Spain, with his intrigues and tortuous diplomacy
attempted to bring England back into the fold of the Roman
Catholic Church. Much of the duplicity charged to Philip
was actually produced by the over-active imaginations of
his aides and ambassadors, but the abortive Ridolfi and
Stuckeley plots were quite real.

This was also a period of transition in the social
structure of England as the last vestiges of feudalism
were being eliminated and the new middle class was emerging.
Cecil was himself a member of this new middle class. If
the cynic claims that Cecil had a vested interest in seeing
this class wax fat at the expense of the other economic
groups in the realm, let him read what Cecil said about
many of the middle class being unfit for government service.

'Another charge which should be leveled at the econ—
omic historians who write of this period is that they
have not spent sufficient time in studying the Elizabethan
office of the Secretary in the Privy Council. The breadth
and scope of this office was so great as to be practically
limitless. Two things account for this: Cecil's indefat-
igability in the performance of his work; the structure
of Tudor government. Modern political scientists would
View as a fault the failure to define the limits of the

office. But structured as the office was, Cecil perforce

REYNOLD RICHARDSON JELTEMA ABSTRACT

discharged his duties therein concerned with much more
than the piling up of wealth for the realm.

Cecil was no original thinker in the field of inter-
national commercial relations. There was little in his
program for strengthening the realm which had not been
tried in reigns previous to Elizabeth's. Regulation of
trade through statute law had been accomplished by English
sovereigns since Edward III. Many aspects of these earlier
statutes were revived in Elizabeth's reign and Cecil wasin
accord with them.

Knowing that the enemies of the realm would strike
their first blows on the high seas, Cecil was meticulous
in seeing that England‘s commerce was protected by force
when necessary. The stakes were high. Defeat of England
would not only mean that that kingdom would know the
horrors of the Inquisition but it would also become the

political appendage of Rome.

THE COMMERCIAL POLICY OF WILLIAM CECIL LORD BURGHLEY

by
Reynold Richardson Jeltema

A THESIS

Submitted to the College of Science and Arts
Michigan State University of Agriculture and
Applied Science in partial fulfillment of

the requirements for the degree of

MASTER OF ARTS

Department of History

1958

Because of the plan of this essay the use of chapter
headings would be only an artificial device to indicate
the three parts. Instead of such headings the end of each
section is separated from the beginning of the next by
quadruple spacing.

The reader's attention is directed to the fact that
the author has erroneously italicized the second and
insuing citations of work of individual authors. For
example, footnote two on page one:

William Cunningham, The Growth of English Industry

and Commerce in Modern Timesj'VblT—II: The Mercantile
System, ch ed. (London, 1907),

 

 

 

 

 

should have been cited on the following pages as

Cunningham, not Cunningham.

 

I give you this charge that you shall be of my
Privy Council and content to take pains for me and
my realm. This Judgement I have of you that you
will not be corrupted by any manner of gift and
that you will be faithful to the state; and that
without respect of my private will you will give me
that counsel which you think best, and if you shall
know anything necessary to be declared to me of
secrecy you shall show it to myself only. And
assure yourself I will not fail to keep taciturnity
therein and therefore herewith I charge you.
With these words Queen Elizabeth I vested William
Cecil with the office of Secretary in her Privy Council.
In the long period of service given to his sovereign
William Cecil was not known to have violated this charge.
Cecil was not a newcomer to high office having
served as Secretary of State under Edward VI. During the
reign of Mary I he served as a member of her Privy Council
and was one of the three commissioners appointed to go to
Brussels for the purpose of meeting Cardinal Pole, the
Papal legate. He was chosen to represent the county of
Lincoln in the Parliament of 1555. He had also acted as
Elizabeth‘s factor and helped her manage her private prop-
erty. This last position had caused Elizabeth to put him

in her trust.2 As evidence of his seemingly boundless

 

1Cited in Conyers Read, Mr. Secretary_Cecil and Queen
Elizabeth (London, 1955), p. 119. Hereafter: Read}

 

 

2William Cunningham, The Growth of English Industry
and Commerce In Modern Times, Vol. II: The Mercantile ‘II
System, 4th edI'ILondon, 1907), p. 53. Hereafter: Cunning-
Egm. The information on Cecil is taken from the Dictionary

 

 

 

 

 

 

energies there are the many thousands of state papers
endorsed, annotated, or drafted by him. Nothing was too
trivial to receive his attention.

The duties of the Secretary "defied definition.“3
Among his duties he was expected to have a thorough knowl-
edge of the supply of munitions, the condition of the

Navy Royal both as to ships and personnel, aliens within
the realm, matters of royal revenue, the Royal Mint, all
foreign relations, and corporations and companies engaged
in overseas trade.

The England of Cecil and Elizabeth in 1558 was weak
both militarily and economically. The loss of Calais had
deprived the English of their principal arsenal for
munitions of war and there was imminent danger of attack
by the Catholic powers. The inept governments of Edward
VI and Mary I had caused English commerce and military
strength to be held in low repute throughout the whole of
Europe. Edward and Mary cannot be wholly saddled with
the blame for this sorry state of affairs. Their father,

Henry VIII, had, through debasement of the coinage, caused

the value of English money to decline on the world market.

 

of National Bio raph . The standard work on Cecil is still
Martin A. S. Hume's The Great Lord Burghley_(London, 1898).
In addition to Read there is a brief account of Cecil's
life in Gravenscroft Dennis' The House of Cecil (London,
1914) and a very short account by HilarEIBelloc in The
Great Tudors, ed. Katherine Garvin (London, 1956). _—_

 

 

 

 

3Read, p. 119.

3

In fact, during Edward's reign a plan to restore the value
of the coinage had been drawn up but never put into effect.“r
During Mary‘s reign it was impossible to accomplish as the
nation was distracted by the religious question. It was
left to William Cecil and Elizabeth to achieve it.

Shortly after his elevation to office, Cecil had
introduced the Queen to Thomas Gresham.5 Recognized as
one of the foremost financiersImmitheoreticians on finan-
cial matters, Gresham was an Englishman of unbounded
loyalty to the Crown. Thoroughly conversant with govern-
mental financial matters, he had gained a reputation for
honesty and great intellect throughout Europe. It was
said that he delayed for a year the sailing of the
Spanish Armada by cornering the bills of the bank in Genoa.
This action prevented the Spanish government from victualing
the fleet for that period.6 Writing to Elizabeth on
matters of public finance soon after the introduction by
Cecil, he concluded his letter thus:

Finally, and it please YburflMaJesty, to restore

this your realm in such estate as heretofore it
hath been, first, Your Highness hath none other

 

“Cunningham, p. 129.

 

5John W. Burgon, The Life and Times of Sir Thomas
Gresham, 2 vols. (London, 1839)I' I} 217. Hereafter:
Eurgon.

 

6Cunningham, p. 1A6.

 

ways, but when time and opportunity serveth, to

bring your base money into fine of XI ounces fine
Evidence of the declining purchasing power of the English
shilling is shown by the fact that where in 1520 twenty
English shillings were worth thirty-two Flemish shillings,
in 1551 they were worth only sixteen.

At the urging of Cecil and Gresham the Queen appointed

a commission to investigate and bring forth a plan for re—
coinage. Cecil served as a member of the commission which
worked so speedily and efficiently that on September 27,
9

1560 a royal proclamation, drafted by Cecil, was issued.

A pamphlet entitled The Summary of Certain Reasons which

 

 

hath made the Queen's Majesty_tg Proceed with the Refor-

 

 

mation of base moneys was published two days later. This,

 

too, was Cecil's work. In the pamphlet Cecil Justified
re-coinage on the grounds that inflated prices would thus
drop, that counterfeiting would cease, that English money
would command a better rate of exchange in overseas markets,

that pensioners and those living on fixed stipends would

 

W—v v—v—v—V ‘v‘ v v ‘fifi

7Burgon, I, 234.

8A. L. Rowse, The En land of Elizabeth: the Structure
of Society (New York,'1 , p."Il7. HEreafter: Rowse.

9A Booke containing all such Proclamations as were
publishEdIduring theRaigne of the Tate QueeneOElIEaEeth,
edl‘H. Dyson (16187_given in—fullrin"Tudor Econdmic"Docu-
ments, ed. R. H. Tawney and Eileen Power, 3'volsivIL6hdon,
1923). II, l95ff. Hereafter: Tawney and Power.

 

 

 

 

 

receive their customary incomes in sound rather than
debased money. He explained that it was the Queen's desire
to restore the integrity of the coinage at great expense
to herself and that her subJects Would be expected to bear
their small share of the burden cheerfully.lo
Two assumptions of Cecil and the rest of the commis-
sion turned out to be wrong. The Queen did make a sub-
stantial profit out of the conversion and prices do not
seem to have fallen though it is quite likely that the
steady rise in prices, due primarily to the influx of gold
and silver from the New World, was somewhat retarded by the
substitution of good money for bad.
It was necessary for Elizabeth to borrow 75,000
pounds from the Antwerp exchange in order to finance the
re-coinage proJect.ll, She even had difficulty raising
money on the Joint credit of the city of London. But
punctuality of repayment created good credit with the
English merchants and byl588 the Queen could borrow easily
from her own subJects as well as from merchant strangers.l2
Another major item on Cecil's agenda was the re-arming

of England so as to prevent successful invasion by any

 

lOR'ead, p a l96f.

llBurgon, I, 364.

l2Cunningham, p. 1A8.

 

power or possible combination of powers.13 He would buy
arms where he could. But better still, he thought, was

to build up native production of armaments and supplies

so as to free England from dependency on European sources.
Buying on the European market was conducted through Thomas
Gresham. Gresham headquartered in Antwerp and from this
vantage point was able to locate arms and munitions which
he promptly bought up and had shipped to England. Working
through an elaborate system of personal spies Gresham was
able to keep abreast of the machinations of his customers
and the political forces opposed to England.lLL '"There is
not one word spoken by the customers, and what they intend

to do but I have perfect intelligence [of it];"15

He
boasted that "it will not be a little spoken of through

the world that her MaJesty, in her wars, doth make payment
of her debts,when neither King Philip, the French King, nor
the King of Portugal in peace time payeth nothing, who

'"16 The demands of state

oweth no small sums of money.
finance were such that the Antwerp money market was on the

way to ruin.

 

fifivfifi

13A Collection of State Pa ers Relatin to Affairs
firs

in the R31 8 of KIn'THenr VI war I, QfiEen Mar ,
Efid Queen glizfifiethfi Eds. Samuel Haynes afid’WillIam Murdinl
R VETS. {London, 1740 , I, 579ff. Hereafter: Haynes and

ur n. -——-__

14Burgon, I , 36orr.

 

 

l51bi—d., 364. l61bid., 3uur.

Cecil's plan to increase native production of arma-
ments and consumer goods called for investments far beyond
the ability of the government. Patents were issued which
gave the issuee the virtual rights of monopoly.17 In this
manner foreign as well as domestic capital was attracted
to England. The resulting products enabled England to
expand her export trade taking payment in cash, credit,
or goods not obtainable at home. A company formed in 1561
to work the Northumberland mines was also given permission
to search for copper at Keswick.18 German laborers were
imported to work in the mines and Thomas Gresham gave the
Fuggers a bond for their expenses.19

In 1565 William Humphrey, Assay Master at the Mint
wrote to Cecil that Hans Loner, the best German brass manu-
facturen,had refused to bring the art of battery into

20

England in spite of his, Humphrey's, efforts. In his

 

v fiV—v wV

17The use of letters patent for the introduction and
protection of new industries was not exclusively a Tudor
device. In 1336 Edward III granted protection to Brabantine
weavers at York (Cal, Patent Rolls, 10 Ed. III, pt. 2, mem.
11). For an essay that treatS'of the evolution of the pat-
ent system see E. H. Hulme'S'"History of the Patent System
Under the PerOfiative and at Common Law," Law Quarterly
Review, XII, l 1ff. I 'II ' '

18Calendar of State Pa ers Domestic Series of the
Rei s of Edward VI, Mar , Eliza etfi, 1547-1580, ['e'd'. Robert
Lemon?) (London, 1856), YVIII,"noI 18. Hereafier: Cal'. Dom.

 

 

 

Eliz.

 

19Ibidu, XL, no. 73._ Steinburg, the German mine ex-
pert, refused to allow engines and equipment constructed by
the Germans to be left in England at the dissolution of the
company (Rowse, p. 125).

20Cal. Dom. Eliz., XXXVII, no. 21, given in full in
Tawney and Power, I, 242f.

 

 

8

letter Humphrey outlined a plan whereby he hoped to outwit
Loner and bring the secrets to England in spite of him.

Fearing casualty of death in this man I have secretly
prepared such Englishmen as shall more suddenly learn
than he suspects; that is to say of young men gold-
smiths that are of the best hammer men for one part.
. I have provided for geometricians skillful in
metals, for speedy conveyancing [of] how to make the
missels and engines for forging and drawing.

The CompanyIIfRoyal Mines was established in 1568
and while those who invested in it did not receive a large
return, it did accomplish the political end of providing
iron and copper for the ordnance.21 Cecil‘s work in aiding
the investors received great praise in a letter from Daniel
Hochstetter to Alderman Duckett.
It is Joyful news to understand that Master Secre-
tary hath shown himself so friendly and forward in
our work of our Mineral and that his money hath been
so ready with the first, and also so willing for the
next payment, praying you to call earnestly upon the
rest that payment may be made, and if they will not
for you, then we pray you desire the help of Master
Secretary in that behalf for in the works of the
mines there must be no want of money.22
As governor of the Royal Mines, Cecil continued an
active interest in procuring a native supply of useful
minerals. The Mineral and Battery Company, an enterprise
undertaken by William Humphrey, received Cecil's personal

financial backing.23 The company dug for calamine stone,

 

2lqy§pinsham. p£.59f.

 

220al. Dom. Eliz., XXXIX, no. 57 cited in Cunningham,
p. 57. ' V V 'I TI '

231-bid., XXXVI, no. 86; XXXVII, no. 30, 43, 44; XL,
no. 3.

 

 

essential for the making of brass. Iron, tin, and lead
were recovered by them also and a mill for the drawing of
wire was set up at Tintern.24
The condition of the merchant marine received Cecil's
attention. Here again Cecil drew upon the energies and
resources of the people rather than exhaust those of the
government. Bounties were regularly paid to private
individuals for building ships.25 Restrictions on the use
of timber necessary in the construction Of ships were
enacted in 1558. Wastage of wood was prohibited by for—
bidding the export of clapboards and barrels from London.26

In a document entitled Arguments £2_prove that i§;i§

 

 

 

necessary for the restoring of the Navy of England to have

more fish eaten and therefore one day more in the week

vfifi

 

 

 

than any other, Cecil outlined a speech he delivered in

 

the Commons of 1563.27 In his speech he analyzed why
English commerce had fallen off. Reference was made to

the decline of the Mediterranean trade, the Irish trade,

 

w w v —v

241mm, XLVIII, no. 43.

25'Cunn in-gham , p . 64 .

 

2§g§;. Dom. Elléh’ CLXXXVI, no. 6, 8, 9, 22 cited in
Cunningham, p. 65.

 

27Ibid., XXVII, no. 71 given in full in Tawney and
Power, II, 104ff. ' ‘

 

10
and the Baltic trade. The Spanish navigation laws which
gave preference to Spanish ships in trade with Spain were
condemned. He listed as other causes of decay the larger
portion of carrying trade to England in the hands of
foreign carriers, the restraints imposed upon the export
of fish by English fishermen. He proposed that a new law
forbid the import of wine or woad except in English bottoms
and remove restraints upon the export of fish. His points
were incorporated into the bill. But with the usual Cecil-
ian thoroughness and attention to detail he took his
arguments one step further and suggested that provisions
be made for increase in the number of mariners.

Some other thing must be provided to increase

the navy and multiply mariners. . .and thereby,
by God's grace, be able to defend the realm
against all foreign power. . . .The very ground

that serveth to breed [mariners] is the trade and
conversation upon the sea, which is divided into
two parts; the one to carry and recarry merchan-
dise; the other is to take fish; for the third
which is piracy, is detestable and cannot last.

He argued that there was no hope of increasing the sale of
fish to foreign countries so there must be more eating

of fish at home. Wednesdays became known aS'"Cecil's
Fast."28 Disliked as it was on gastronomic and religious
grOunds, the Commons of 1571 was unable to repeal it and

it stood until it expired in 1585.29

 

28.1. E. Neale, Elizabeth I and Her Parliaments, 1559-
1581 (London, 1953), p.‘116."H§rearterI 'Neale.' ‘

 

291bid., p. 225.

11
Although attempts had been made to increase the
number of English ships engaged in the wine trade3O Cecil
did not give his full support to these. He saw disadvan-
tages in other ways and contrasted them with his scheme
for promoting the fishing trades. In a paper entitled

.The Incenveniences 9£_enlarging ary'pgwer go bring any

 

 

 

more wine BEER the realm he expressed the fear that such

 

enlargement would only work to the benefit of England's
enemy, France.31 He held that nothing ". . .is more
hurtful to the realm than wine" and this for four reasons:
First, the wine trade "enricheth France"; second, wines
from Bordeaux and Rouen must be paid for with money "for
in Bordeaux they have an ordinance forbidding bartering
with any Englishman for wines" so that the gold brought
home by merchants from"Spain or the Low Countries. . .is
conveyed into France"; third, drinking of wine by the
laboring class causes them to squander their wages: fourth,
drinking of wine reduces the use of beer and ale thereby
in turn reducing the acreage of grain causing farming to
decline'"which of all labors in the realm would be

favored.”32

 

V a ifiv vw

3Ol Eliz. c. 13 provided for discriminating duties
against the lading of foreign ships.

. 3lCa1. Dom. Eliz., XLI, no. 58 cited in Cunningham,
pp 70ff. '

 

 

32The statute 5 E112. c. 5 which gave'"Cecil's Fast"
legal status covered many items all designed to strengthen

12

Political and religious conditions in mid—sixteenth
century Europe caused many aliens to seek refuge in England.
For the most part these refugees were highly skilled
workers of Protestant faith. With the accession of Eliza-
beth their numbers increased as the religious climate of
England became more moderate. These were the types of
people Cecil would attract to England for their various
skills were needed if England were to become self-sufficient
in the production of the many and varied types of finished
goods. It was Cecil's hope and desire that these foreign
workers would teach the native English their skills.33
Colonies of aliens were often planted in English towns
and regulations drawn up governing trading and policing.
Such plans for colonies were often submitted to Cecil and
the details supervised by him. A notable success was
achieved in the town of Colchester where in 1570 eleven
households arrived from Flanders.34 These people wished

to make.needles and parchment and weave sackcloth.

 

v

and maintain the naVy. Export of herring and other ocean
fish was permitted without payment of'”Customes, Subsidie,
or Pondage Money;" Import of fish by English subJects was
toll free except at Kingston-on-Hull where the mayor and
burgesses took tolls as granted by 33 Henry 8. Coastal
shipping by foreigners was forbidden. French wine was to
be imported in English ships. Owners of ships were granted
the right to take one or more apprentices. Exportation of
various grains was permitted under certain conditions. 5
Eliz. c. 5 is given in full in Tawney and Power, II, 110ff.

. 33C'a‘1'. Dom. Eliz., XLIII, no. 39 cited in Cunningham,
p. 79. Cecil was especially interested in the'manufacture

of sailcloth for the navy and established a colony of linen
weavers at Stamford for that purpose (ibid., XLIII, no. 11).

3ACunningham, pg 82f.

 

 

 

13
In one instance aliens were invited to settle in the
town of Norwich in order to revitalize the manufacture of

35

woolens. Apparently many of the native English crafts-
men had been attracted to other trades and locations.
Since "dyverse strangers of the Low Countries are now come
to London and Sandwich" for the purpose of making wool
under patent, an effort on the part of the mayor and other
citizens to obtain Flemish settlers to revive the Norwich
trade resulted in thirty master workmen settling there.
Extracts from a letter written by these refugee
strangers at Norwich to relatives and friends in Ypres have
a homesteading flavor.
Send any money and the three children. Come at
once and do not be anxious; I and my brother will
supply you with what you require here as a weaver,
for there is great trade doing. . .3 When you come
to Norwich you shall have gold; It is very dear
to hear the word of God peacefully.3
The city of Norwich gained much by permitting these

Flemish craftsmen to settle there.37 They not only taught

 

#- Vfifv~~vfi

35Records of the City 2: Norwich,[ed. W. Hudson and
J. T.8TingleYI II, 332, given in full in Tawney and Power,
I, 29 f. ' _

36Trans. from H. Q. Janssen, De Hervormde vlugtelingen
van Yperen in Engeland (Middleb., 1857)Iin W. J."C.IM'5'e3ns'r
Register ofIBaptisms 23 the Dutch Church at Colchester
(1905), pir220ff et;passim, reprinted in Tawney and Power,
I, 299ff. V

 

 

 

 

 

 

37Cal. Dom; Eliz., XX, no. 49; CXXVII, no. 8 given
in full ianawney_and”Power, I, 315ff.

 

 

14
the English the art of making types of cloth never before
made in England, but because of their industry many of the
city's poor were put to gainful employment. The wealth
created by their labor permitted the repair of decayed
dwellings. They made a substantial contribution to the
local tax rolls and curbed Juvenile delinquency by creating
Jobs for youths.

Relations between England and Spain worsened with
the accession of Elizabeth I. This deterioration grew
apace over a thirty year period and culminated in the
defeat of the Spanish Armada in 1588. Until actual hostili-
ties broke out between the two countries each took measures
to cripple the others commerce. The area of struggle on
land was the Spanish Netherlands. It was here that the
political and military force of the Protestant Netherlanders
was pitted against that of Catholic Spain. Geographically
England could have remained a bystander and let the two
antagonists fight it out. However, she had much to lose
by letting Spain quash the Netherland's revolt. Intel-
lectually Cecil, Elizabeth, and the maJority of the English
body politic had had their fill of Catholicism a la Espagge.
'They knew that a Spanish victory in the Netherlands would
‘be the prelude to invasion of England.

While direct trade with Spain was important to England
it was being surpassed in value by that with the Netherlands.

IHaving established a reputation for the production of wool

l5
cloth, England needed the Netherlands as a vent. For
political purposes Margaret of Parma, regent of the Nether-
lands (1559-1567), closed the ports to shipping from
November of 1563 to February 2, 1564.38 The Privy Council
in turn ordered all shipments of wool to the Netherlands

held up until such time as a group of impartial merchants

could be consulted.39

Cecil issued his own memorandum on the subJect in

which he set forth the reasons for not resuming the tradef"O

He cited three reasons for this: It was foolish for England
to do the bulk of her trading through the port of Antwerp
as it was too vulnerable to attack; the present balance of

trade was favorable to Antwerp and not to England; the

38England had been at war with France primarily over
the Hugenot question since 1561. The disturbance of trade
was really a by-product of this war. English privateers
preyed on shipping in the Channel without regard to nation-
ality. Protestantism in the Netherlands was being champ-
ioned by the Prince of Orange. Margaret of Parma aided by

her adviser, Cardinal Granville, attempted to crush this in-
cipient force and at the same time reduce the favor in which

the Protestant Netherlanders held the schismatic English.

She sent Christopher d’Assonleville to England as her special
envoy to present a list of grievances to Elizabeth.
Iieceiving no satisfaction from Elizabeth's ministers, d'~
.Assonleville reported back to Margaret and the resultant

Inas the order closing the ports.

39The Acts of the Priv Council, 2 vols.,[ed. John
Iloch Dasenfilltondon, I89 - 7), VII, 1 7f. Hereafter:

I)asent.

AOCal. Dom. Eliz., XXXV, no. 3 given in full in
TPawney;afiaTTower, II, 45ff.

16
increased cloth trade had caused a decline in English
agriculture, had created a laboring class difficult to
govern, and had created a shortage of skilled help for
other types of manufacture. Cecil discussed the quality
of the cloth, the inconveniences created by stoppage of
production, and the reduction in royal revenue by the loss
of customs on the export of cloth. He was of the opinion
that the royal revenue would increase for the rate of ex-
port duty was higher on raw wool than on finished cloths.
That some merchants would be forced out of business because
of the stoppage was foreseen by Cecil. He thought, however,
that it was better to concentrate the business in the hands
of merchants who were strong financially rather than spread
it among many merchants, some of whom were in weak finan-
cial positions. As to the stoppage of production Cecil
felt-that this would affect only those engaged in producing
white cloths since all other types would find their way
into the market by devious routes. He suggested that
legislation be passed forcing the people engaged in the
production of white cloth to take up other pursuits.
Barring any such possibility he would have them rounded up
and shipped to Ireland as colonists.

Cecil suggested to Margaret of Parma that the ques—
tions regarding restraint of trade be settled by a confer-

ence at Bruges.41 This suggestion did not meet with

 

V r fv ‘ w h

AllRead, p. 293.

l7
Margaret's approval. Her prime desire was the elimination
of the Navagation Acts passed in the first and second

parliaments of Elizabeth.42

Cecil favored the farmer and others who gained their
livelihoodlniworking the soil. Indeed, the one great fear
by which he seemed possessed was that England would not
have sufficient food if too many people were to leave the
farms for the cities. He did not favor the expansion of
the cloth trade at the expense of farm production. 0n the
other hand, he encouraged aliens to come to England for
the purpose of teaching the art of cloth making to the
English. His main obJect for doing this was to accumulate
money which would be used to strengthen the defense of the
realm. His secondary aims were to check the flow from
England of money which went to pay for exports and to
restore stability to town life by providing employment for
the poor and increasing the amount of taxable property.

Cecil expressed his commercial viewpoint in terms of
a morality which condemned any practices which he felt would
‘weaken the realm economically. He knew that only an England
‘which was more nearly self-sufficient economically could

successfully oppose the military strength of France and

Spain.

 

+V—v fl

421 Eliz. c. 11 aimed primarily at smugglers permitted
the unloading of ships only in daylight; 5 E112 c.5 the
famouS'"Cecil's Fast" laid restrictions on shipping of wine
and woad; 5 Eliz. c.6 forbade those with less than 3000
jpounds income from buying on credit; 5 Eliz. c.7 forbade the
importation of girdles, harnesses, rapiers, daggers, knives,
~belts, and pummels which were among the chief exports of the
TLow Countries.

18

The year 1569 was a year of crisis for Cecil, for
Elizabeth, and for the realm. Cecil had cautioned against
the use of Antwerp as the port through which the maJor
share of English trade was conducted with the Low Coun-
trie§3.l‘L3 His argument that this vent was too vulnerable
to attack from hostile powers was proven correct when
Philip of Spain directed the Duke of Alva to proceed to
the Netherlands as regent and crush the revolt which was
being waged against Spanish rule.uu Through Cecil's
statesmanship and Elizabeth's feminine guile England was
able to.acquire the commercial leadership that had been
Spain's.

Cecil summarized the problems facing England in
1569 in a paper entitled A Short Memorial on the State of

_the Healm.45 He deplored conditions within and without

 

 

 

 

43Cal. Dom. Eliz., XXXV,.no. 3 given in full in
Tawneyw mud Power, II p. 45ff.

 

uuAlva was given this task by Philip in 1567 and went
about it with a thoroughness which aroused English sympath-
ies and fears for the Netherlanders. Because of A1va"s
methods the number of immigrants to England took a sharp
upswing.

“5Calendar of Manuscri ts of the Most Honorable The
Marquis of SaIIsbury, KG., PreserveHFEt Hat tfield”House,
Hertfordgfiire, ll vols. *(London, I883- 1906), I, no. 1452
‘Hereafter: IHatfield MSS.

Haynes, p. 579ff. Cecil summarized the weaknesses of
the "Queens MaJesty' s Estate" as lack of marriage, foreign
alliance by reason of long peace, weak frontiers, ignorance
of martial knowledge, lack of captains and trained soldiers,

 

 

 

 

 

19
the realm which tended toward weakness. The ever present
fear that Spanish operations in the Low Countries were the
prelude to invasion of England colored his estimate of the
situation, not unjustifiably. Cecil named Spain and France
as the two enemies of England and gave three reasons why it

was best for England's interests that she give aid to the

 

the Irish rebels, government grown soft and remiss, sub-
Jects grown overbold, tension between England and France
and England and Spain. Other imperfections cited were

the lack of treasue, poverty of the nobility, "wealth being
in the meaner sort, which are unfit for service [to the
Crown];" Certainly he could not object to commoners
amassing wealth from business or trade, nor could he obJect
to their being employed by the Crown for he and many of his
contemporaries, the Walsinghams and the Cromwells had
sprung, not from the old feudal classes, but from the new
middle class. Cecil charged that France and Spain'"have
offended the Queen" by staying traffic; in time of plague,
used the Queen's ambassadors dishonorably, refused to -
confirm the Treaty of Cateau-Cambresis and had denied
Justice to the merchants. Margaret of Parma had closed

the Netherlands‘ ports ostensibly because of the plague

but in reality to bring pressure to bear on England as the
plague was then past its peak. Dr. Man, the English ambas-
sador to the Spanish court, received cavalier treatment

at the hands of Philip's ministers. Forbidden to hold
religious services in his own house (Calendar of Letters
and State Papers Relating to En lish Affairs, Preserved
Principally in the Archives 23 imahcas, Vol. II, 1568-
1579 [Martin A. S. Hume, ed., London,I894], p. 9 no. 8
[Hereafter: Cal. Span. l568-l579]), and charged with
saying that the Pope was “a cafiting little monk" (ibid., p.
29, no. 20) he wrote to Elizabeth that Philip had denied
him audience nineteen times (ibid., p. 45, no. 35). Cateau-
Cambresis terminated the war between France and Spain in
which England under Mary I had supported Spain. By terms
of the treaty Calais, which had fallen to France, was to

be returned to England by 1566. This was not carried out.
The Privy Council received many complaints from the mer-
chants of the slow handling of their cases by Margaret of
Parma and d'Assonleville (Dasent, VII, 23, 329) and in one
instance directed the Judge of the Admiralty Court to

hear the case.

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

Low Countries: Their present (warlike) state prevented
France and Spain from establishing Romish power; they were
already assembled, armed, and engaged in the quarrel; it
cost less to the Low Countries than it would to England
were she to equip and send an army out of the realm. In
a letter to Philip dated May 1, 1568, de Silva, the Spanish
ambassador to England, reported Cecil as saying that Spain
wished to rule the world and conquer England.)46 Writing
to Elizabeth on July 14, 1568, de Silva protested her
allowing persons to embark to the Low Countries with arms?7
He stated his displeasure because Cecil would not issue
the official proclamation against the exportation of arms
which Elizabeth had already promised. Writing again to
Philip on July 17, de Silva reported that Cecil had shown
him a copy of the proclamation but that he doubted Cecil's
sincerity.48

Tension was heightened between England and Spain at
‘this time for in November of 1568 several Spanish ships
laden with money, supposedly for the duke of Alva, took

refuge from Channel pirates in the ports of Plymouth and

 

46Ca1. Span. 1568-1579, p. 27, no. 18.

 

 

”71mm, pg 52ff, no. 38. 4

48Ibid., pffi5uff, no. 39.

 

21
Southampton,49 When it became obvious that Cecil and
Elizabeth had no intention of immediately releasing the

money, de Spes,50

in high dudgeon, asked Alva to seize
English property in the Netherlands.51 He hoped that this
action would pressure Cecil and Elizabeth into doing that
which polite diplomacy had failed to do. ‘"If the Queen
restores the money. . . it will be easy to return the

'1

English property to its owners, wrote de Spes to Alva.52
But Elizabeth was adamant in her contention that the money
belonged to private parties and not to Philip. '"By aid

of this money they will equip themselves to harass the

 

49Ibid. ,pp. 83ff, no. 6239p. 88ff, no. 64. He wrote
that "Cecil, whenever he can, favors the pirates, both on
account of religious partiality and the great profit he
derives from it;" cf. Cal. Dom. Eliz., XXVII, no. 87 given
in full in Tawney and Power, II, 104ff.

 

 

 

50de Spes had replaced de Silva as ambassador to
England.

51Cal. Span. 1568-1579, p. 90. no. 65; pg'90f, no. 66.
Giovanni Correr, Venetian ambassador to France writing to
the Signory: '"It is reported that the Queen of England had
detained a Spanish vessel and seized 300,000 silver crowns
. . .and in consequence EAlva] had detained all English
subJects in Flanders. " Calendar of State Papers and Manu-
scripts Relating to English Affairs Existing in the Archives

 

 

 

and Collections of *Venice and Other Libraries of‘Nbrthern
Italy, Vol. VII, 15‘8““85 ~15 0"[fiawdon Brown and Rt. Ho'n"'.' 'G'. "
Cavendish Bentinck, eds., London, 1890], p. 428ff. no. 48.)
Hereafter: Cal. Ven. 1558- 1580.

 

 

 

 

5298.1. span. 1568-1579, p. 92, no. 67.

 

 

22

States by troubling us at sea, and preventing, so far as
they can, commerce with Spain," was the opinion de Spes
expressed in a letter to Alva.53

In retaliation for these seizures by Alva, Elizabeth
had issued a proclamation on January 6, 1569, ordering
seizure of all Spanish goods, ships, and money within the
realm, and a forebearance of the trade with Spain and the
Netherlands "until the intentions and designs of the King
are known;"54 Having determined that the money was the
property of some merchants and having prevented its falling
into the hands of pirates, she decided she should "negoti-
ate with the owners thereof. . .for borrowing from them
all or part of it [as she] has frequently raised loans from
merchants subject to the King of Spain;" Philip in turn
issued a proclamation on April 6, 1569, which not only
forbade trade with England but also restricted the sailing
of ships from the Low Countries to ports other than those

in England.55

 

5.3Idem., p. 93.
5“Ib1d., pn 99ff, no. 71A.

55The details of Philip's proclamation were contained
in a newsletter from Antwerp (Cal. Rome, 1, p. 302, no.
581). "No ship is to quit these_ports unless provided with
men, artillery, and other munitions for defense against
corsairs pursuant to the order of his Majesty's Vice-
Admiral. . .any person may fit out ships for war against
corsairs upon security given that he will attack none other
than said corsairs under pain of body and goods if he should

 

23

de Spes took a jaundiced view of Cecil's activities
when it became apparent that he could not expect to recover
the money for Philip. '"These heretic knaves of the Council
are going headlong to perdition, incited by Cecil," he
wrote to Philip.56 To Alva he wrote that while "Cecil
rules [sigj I do not believe that there will be lasting
peace."57 de Spes believed that by choking off England's
commerce she could be humbled. '"Whenever Flemish matters
are calm your Majesty [mayjchoose to stop English commerce
without even drawing the sword."58 On English trade with
France he wrote, "it is true that it would be greatly to

the Christian King‘s advantage to stop English trade."59

 

do. . .contrariewise. . .no insurance is henceforth to be
made upon any sort of vessel till further orders of his
Majesty, pending which time other means will be found of
enabling navigators to proceed upon their voyages in safety
. . .no person whether a subject of his Majesty or a for-
eigner is to do any manner of business in his Majesty's
dominions with Englishmen or their factors, or to export

or import goods to or from any dominions in which English-
men, dwelling here or elsewhere, may have any manner of
dealings with his Majestyt subjects, on pain of confiscation
of the merchandise or value thereof, and the ships, carts,
or horses, and forfeiture of his Majesty's favor, etct"

56Ibid., p. 95, no. 70.

57Ibid., p. 99, no. 71. de Spes did not understand
Cecil's position in the Council otherwise he would not
have made such an ignorant statement.

581b1d., p. 85, no. 62.

59Ib1d., p. 95, no. 70.

2A

de Spes viewed the solution to Spain's problem as
embargo against England. To Cecil, who was in a position
which gave him a broader view of the total picture,there
was no simple solution but only a need for a mixture of
calculated caution and bold action. It was necessary for
England to maintain trade with the Low Countries. If this
were temporarily impossible then necessity dictated that
through bold action new outlets would have to be found.
So with the major port of Antwerp closed to English traders,
the bulk of the trade was switched to Hamburg, "the most
friendly to England of all the Hanse towns;"50 de Spes
reported to Philip that the English were prepared to ship
20,000 pieces of cloth through this port.61 He advised
that it would be best to stop imports of oil and alum into

England because without them "they cannot carry on their

60Calendar of State Papers Forei Series of the
Reign of ElizaEetfiT Preserved in the Fuglic Eggord'affice,
VEIT"XTY, August 1584--August 1583T§opfiie Crawford meas,
ed., London, 1916);fip. 17. at eld MSS., I, no. 1029.
The merchant Adventurers had traded with Hamburg prior to
1569. They petitioned the Council in 156# to support them
and the Merchants of the Staple in a monopoly of the trade
and requested either a loan from the government or remis-
sion of customs for one year.

 

 

 

 

61Cal. Span.,Al568-l579, p. 107, no. 78. gag, 22m.
Eliz., LYVTI,fno. 18, 32. Ships of the Royal Navy were
assigned to convoy the Hamburg fleet. Newsletters from
Antwerp in February and March of 1569 reported that Eliza-
beth was ordering armed escorts for ships of the Hamburg
fleet (Calendar of State Papers Relating_to English Affairs
Ifireserved Principally at Rome in the vatiEEn Archives7fiMfV
Idibrar , 2 vols. IJ. MT_Rigg, "at, London, l916,.1926]{ I,
301.5

Hereafter: Cal. Rome.

 

 

 

 

 

25

cloth manufacture."62 The shortage of the necessary oil
and alum did not deter the English in their cloth production
for later that year de Spes wrote Philip that oil was to be
obtained from "rape seed to dress their wool, and they say
that they can manage with it.‘"63

de Spes persisted in his belief that with one stroke
by Spain, England could be felled. He wrote Philip in
April of 1569, "to take this [Hamburg] fleet would be to

d."64 But Philip would not move and Alva's

take all Englan
problems in the Netherlands would not permit him to take
decisive action against the English on the sea.

If de Spes and Philip were concerned about England's
trade witthamburg and the Low Countries, certain Spanish
merchants were even more concerned about their trade with
the same area. In a memorial to Philip they complained

of the detention in English ports of Spanish ships bound

for the Netherlands and charged that the cargoes were

 

62Cal. Span. 1568—1579, p. 113, no. 83.

v~v—

 

 

631bid., p. 186, no. 130.

6L‘Ibidu p. 142, no. 93. de Spes was counting on an
internal revolt headed by the dukes of Norfolk and Arundel
to be carried out in concert with action by Philip. This
attempt to overthrow Elizabeth's government was later
known as the "Ridolfi Plot;" Cecil and Elizabeth were
aware of it almost from its inception. Gathering evidence
bit by bit Cecil moved quickly to quash it in 1572. Until
then he and Elizabeth stalled all negotiations for the
resumption of trade.

26

seized and sold in England.65 Since "the Queen of England
has declared she will not treat with the duke of Alva on

' the mer-

the matter nor with your Majesty‘s ambassador,‘
chants asked that a member of the treasury be sent to treat
with Elizabeth on the matter. Philip's merchants knew that
which both he and Alva in their blind rush to crush heresy
could not know until it was too late; that freedom to
traverse the Channel was necessary if Spain were to main-
tain its leadership in the western world. Alva had effec-
tively smashed the Netherlands markets and unwittingly
created conditions for the close cooperation between
England and the Low Countries which was to end Spanish
domination in that area.

Many of the Netherlanders who escaped the wrath of
Alva fled to English seaports. Operatingout of these
ports as rebels against Alva, they preyed on Spanish and
French shipping in the Channel much to the discomfort and
dismay of both Alva and Philip. Intelligence reaching
Cecil in May of 1569 informed him that many ships saltfig
from Zealand to Spain and Portugal were taking the long

route around the coast of Scotland rather than run the

risk of falling prey to the rebels in the Channel.66

 

VfiVV

659314 Span. 1568-1579,Pp. 143f, no. 94.

 

 

683atfield MSS, I, no. 1302.

 

27

‘"Piratica1 rebels" who used the English ports as
havens of safety were the subject of a complaint from de
Spes to Cecil.67 de Spes reported to Philip that'“there
is a great fair of spice, wines, wool, saffron, oil, soap,
woad. . .stolen from your Majesty's subjects," at Yarmouth
on the Isle of Wight.68 Elizabeth issued proclamations
against the harboring and maintaining of pirates.69 The
judge of the Admiralty court was ordered to investigate all
cases of piracy brought before him.70

As early as 1563-1564 instructions were given to the
vice admirals and commissioners appointed for the supres-
sion of piracy for the purpose of'"carrying out her
Majesty‘s intention" to curb pirates in the Channel who
were not then rebels against Alva but whose actions would
embarass England with Spain.71 Specifically these officers
were directed to apprehend anyone suspected ofMplundering
any subject of the King of Spain or of any friendly power;"

The timorous tenor of this proclamation was due to the

inferior position in which England found herself with

 

fiv—v—V i i v

679al. Span. 1568-1579. p. 244, no. 182.
68Ibid , p. 245, no. 189.

69Cal. Dom. Eliz., XXXIII, no. 213 XLIX, no. 793
LVIII, no. 3; LYIX, no. 28; LXXIV, no. 33.

7OIbid., LVIII, no. 20.

711b1d,, xxxv, no. 17. Hatfield MSS, I, no. 949.

 

 

28

respect to Spain in 1563. Elizabeth could not yet afford
to offend Philip for he was in a position to retaliate
severely and swiftly if he chose to do so. In this pre-
Alvan period Cecil and Elizabeth had to placate Philip
until their commercial policy and external events would
place them in a position of greater strength.

The severity of Alva's policy in the Netherlands
with its negative effects on commerce coupled with the
positive results of Cecil's program for increasing England's
military potential did permit Cecil and Elizabeth to move
from a position of strength in 1569.72 It is a little
difficult to believe that Elizabeth was entirely sincere
in her efforts to curb piracy as it was a most effective
weapon against Philip and Alva. As piracy in the Channel
was on the increase, de Spes wrote Philip complaining that
profits realized from goods taken and sold in England were
strengthening the country's economy.73

Cecil had voiced his detestation of piracy in the

Commons of 1563.74 His fear that it would dislocate

 

V w Vv

72Ibid., no. 1247. In a memo to de Spes, the Lord
Admiral and Cecil stated their belief that Alva's pro-
ceedings in the Netherlands had the approval of Philip and
that England in retaliation would arrest Spanish subjects.
They further informed him that ships had been ordered to
the Downs to stay shipping from Spain to the Netherlands.
Cecil and Elizabeth could not have taken this attitude
toward Spain in 1563.

73Cal. Span. 1568-1579, p. 157, no. 102.

74Ca1. Dom. Eliz., XXVII, no. 71 given in full in
Tawney and Power, II, p. 104ff.

 

 

29
legitimate trade was well founded.75 As England's commerce
expanded the merchants became more insistent upon protection
by the government from depredations by the pirates. The
ITumerous proclamations against piracy issued by Elizabeth's
government represented the official position, albeit the
topographical nature of England made enforcement of these
proclamations difficult. The Privy Council, with Cecil in
76

regular attendance, continued to issue orders to the
vice admirals of the various ports to bend every effort

in apprehending pirates. In February of1570 the Council
directed English and foreign merchants residing in England

to take care of goods belonging to those Spanish subjects

who took refuge in English ports from Channel pirates.77

 

fifi V

75Complaints of the depredations by pirates were
constantly sent to Cecil and Elizabeth not only from the
Spanish ambassador but also from the English merchants.

76A listing of the meetings at which each member of
the Council was present is provided at the end of each
volume of Dasent. Of all the members Cecil had by far the
greatest percentage of attendance.

77Dasent,‘VIII, 15. There were important international
political as well as economic motives for issuance of this
particular proclamation. The relations of Elizabeth's
government to that of France was dependent upon the rise
and fall of the Catholic and Protestant factions in the
French court. As the French Protestants were in the ascen-
dancy in 1570 there was less possibility of a united
French and Spanish attack upon England. Taking advantage
of this respite from pressure, Cecil, Elizabeth, and the
Council attempted through issuance of the proclamation to
mollify Philip who was still bitter over the seizure of
the money. This could be considered the first step leading
to the convention at Nimwegen in 1573 which called for a
resumption of the trade with the Netherlands.

As the revolt of the Netherlands, which broke out
‘afresh in 1572, was being effectively led by the Prince of
Orange on land, pirate-patriots were working havoc on com-
merce in the Channel waters. Unfortunately for neutrals,
they did not distinguish between them and Spanish merchant-
men, and often as not English ships fell prey to them. In
addition to these privateers who operated under letters of
marque from Orange, there were so-called "Frebutters" [sis]

78

who claimed to be rebels against Spain. A series of
letters was sent by the Council to Lord Cobham, Vice Admiral
of the Cinque Ports, and to various harbor officials in
September and October of 1571 enjoining them to re-double
their efforts in apprehending these‘"Frebutters.‘"79
Elizabeth's government was subject: to no end of
embarrassment by the open way in which the Channel pirates
disposed of their stolen goods. The Council, writing to

Sir Henry Crips and the commissioners of the Cinque Ports,

said that the pirates' activities were such that'"not only

 

781bi'd.,pp. 27f, 46f. In a letter to Sir Henry
Ratcliffe, Captain of Portsmouth, the Council ex ressed
its thanks for his diligence in searching for a'Captain
Jacques" who pretended to be operating under a letter of
marque from the Prince of Orange.

791bid'.,pp. 44ff, 49. The losses of the Steelyard
to pirates were so great that it petitioned the Council
to order more protection (ibid., p. 46f).

31
the government at home is sclaundered [§i£]but also trafic
[gig] from all ports [is] much hindered and decayed."8O

Enforcement of Elizabeth's decrees did not always
have the desired effect of maintaining the official peace
with Spain. In 1572 de Guaras81 reported to Philip that
Brille on the island of Flushing had fallen to pirate—
patriots under the leadership of one de Lumy.82 The
Council had decreed the expulsion of de Lumy from England
for his piratical activities.83 He in turn gathered his
men and resources and launched the successful attack
against Brille.

The trade which the English merchants enjoyed with
Hamburg was eminently successful. Intelligence from
Antwerp to the Vatican reported in June of 1569 that "there
is no news from England save that on the whole they would
fain arrange matters and restore the trade [with Antwerp]?84
The informer despaired that the problem of restoring the

trade would come about "because things take their wonted

[sic] course, the more so that the fleet has set sail for

 

80Ibid., p. 67.

81de Guaras was the "unofficial ambassador" to
England appointed by Philip after the expulsion of de Spes.

82Cal'. Span. l568el579,pp. 385f, no. 322; no. 323.

 

 

83Dasent, VIII, 67.

8ucal. Rome, I, 309, no. 59u.'

 

32
the new port at Hamburg." The note of despair here would
tend to show the foreign merchants'realization that
England's commercial position was strong and would grow
even stronger until something was done to restore Antwerp
to its previous position of dominance.85

In March of 1570 intelligence reached the Vatican
that negotiations were under way between Alva and England

86

for restoration of the trade. Three commissioners were
appointed by Alva, "Gasparo Sez, Treasurer of the Court,
d'Assonleville, and the Giustineto, for criminal causes;
and it is believed that they will arbitrate to good purpose
.Alva directed that all merchants interested are to

.1187

furnish a list of goods taken. Five Flemish merchants

were chosen to go to England "to do the same office there.“88

 

85Kervyn de Lettenhove, Baron, Relations Politiques
des Pa s-Bas et de l'Angleterre Sous Le‘Re ne de Phili e
IIT' vol§T_K§?uE§ells, 1882-1888), VT—588. HEFeafter:
fEttenhove. A memorial on the commerce of Antwerp published,
it is thought, in 1570 said the commerce enjoyed by Antwerp
was founded on the relations among the English, the Port-
ugese, and the Italians, and that negotiations were under-
way between the English and the Portugese to have the
Portugese trade transferred to some English port.

 

 

 

 

86Cal. Rome, 1, p. 330, no. 654.

 

87Ibid , p. 332, no. 656.

8§£§£g.,pp. 332f, no. 658. Intelligence to the

Vatican was in error stating that on April 10, 1570, an
accord had been established as a result of the negoti-
ations.

33

On May 4, Alva received from John Marsh, governor
of the Merchant Adventurers at Antwerp, a request in the
name of all the merchants and citizens of England "qui ont
frequenté et traffique au Pays-Bas et en toute aultres
dominions et signories apertenant au Roy Catholique" to
have inserted in any treaty which might result, clauses
pertaining to the merchants, their goods, and facilities.89
On all points Alva was willing to acquieé? provided
Elizabeth took reciprocal action towards the Spanish
merchants and their goods.90

The dispute was not as speedily settled as the hopes
of the merchants indicated. In April intelligence sources
in Antwerp were advising the Vatican that "there is not
much hope of the accord with the English because they claim
to have the goods restored to them and be exempt from re-
storing that which they have detained in England."91

Cecil received a letter dated June 8 from John Fitz-
William92 in which the agitation of the merchants was made

known:

 

‘7

89Lettenhove, V, 646ff.

 

90Ibid'., p. 646 and note.

91Cal. Rome, I, 335, no. 667. Alva informed Eliza-
beth that a large Fleet sailing from Nimwegen for Spain
was collected solely to escort the Spanish queen and that
Elizabeth‘"need have no fear [the fleet will do any harm
to her countries" (ibid., p. 342, no. 6 6).

 

92One of the three English commissioners sent to the
Low Countries to negotiate settlement.

34
Here is great desire to understand what answer may
come from the Queens Majesty touching our suits of
the merchants. . . .If it should stand long on
these terms, they should be forced to change their

trades and plant themselves in some other place
where they might find more liberty.93

The merchants appointed by Alva to go to England were in
no great hurry to get there as information from Antwerp
dated June 24 reported:

They make no haste for in the lyme [sic] of intreaty

they have left no time in sending to and from Spain

of ships so that now there is now a great mass of

all manner of commodities come out of Spain and

other places, and also many ships laden from hence

into Spain and thirefore much doubted the treaty

will go forward.9

Through Fitz-William, Elizabeth directed complaints

to Alva against the activities of de Spes, charging him
with inciting the rebels of the North, and stating her
belief that his, Alva's, gathering of the armed ships to
escort the queen of Spain was really a pretext for amassing
a fleet to be used for invasion of England.95 But the ever
'"politiqué' Elizabeth left ajar the door to further
negotiation by stating that she would negotiate peace if
that were the duke's desire. Alva answered Elizabeth

through Fitz-William on July 25 that he would advise Philip

 

93Lettenhove,V., 661.

 

gulbidx, p. 671.

9SIbid., p. 675. Henry Cobham was instructed by
Elizabeth to go to the Low Countries for the purpose of
coming "to certainty of knowledge what the duke's intention
is in his preparation of so great a navy (ibid., p. 691).

35
of Elizabeth's complaints against de Spes, at the same time
glossed over any actions involving de Spes which had caused
Elizabeth's displeasure.96 He indicated to Henry Cobham
during the latter's mission to the Low Countries that "as
touching the ambassador of Spain resident in England, there
should be done so much therein as may content the Queen;
but of this. . .he would confer with one perhaps wiser than
himself."97

Because the merchandise seized by Elizabeth had been
dispersed throughout the realm, the task of determining
its value lasted well into September of 1570. In September
de Spes wrote d'Assonleville "me samble qu'il seroit que
tres-prouffitable'pour nous s'ls se vouloyent auculnement
ranger a la raison et 1'accepter comme Son Excellence 1e
leur a offert;"98y

Alva was determined to undermine the English staple
at Hamburg for it was quite evident that this vent was
proving very profitable to the merchants there. In an
attempt to accomplish this and at the same time drive a
wedge between the English Crown and the merchants, he

licensed certain persons to bring English cloths into the

 

96Ibid., p. 678. Alva, knowing full well what de
Spes was doing, wrote him on July 27 to cease his intrigues
for fear of upsetting the commercial negotiations (ibid.,

p. 680).

97Ibid., p. 700. 981bid., p. 711.

36
Low Countries. News of this reached London from Hamburg
by letter dated November 23, 1570:

The Duke of Alva has granted a certain license to
sundry persons to bring English cloths into the

Low Countries, whereby it seems that such persons
make accompt to have them nearer [at] hand than
this place for the better cheap and less charges,
as either by license out of England directly or by
way of France as to Calais or other port there
about. . .so we shall not be able to utter the
great mass of cloth 3nd other commodities presently
lying on our hands.9

A rumor to the effect that the restitution of goods
had been effected early in December of 1570 was transmitted
in a letter from Antwerp to London.100 Subsequent events
proved the rumor to be false as on the 20th of the same
month John Marsh petitioned Cecil to obtain passports for
himself'". . .John Fitz-William, Richard Saltconstall, and
John Aldersey and their servant, also to procure [Eliza-
beth's] commission to consent to release of the arrest here,
if the duke do[es] the like there first."101

From Antwerp on January 3, 1571, Fitz-William reported
to Cecil of.preliminary arrangements to have Thomas Fieschi,
'"the principle merchant in Antwerp," come to London for
talks with Cecil and other Council members in order to
speed negotiations.102 Fitz-William hinted to Cecil that

d'Assonleville had fallen in Alva's favor as a negotiator

 

lOO

99Ibidu, VI, 15. Ibid , p. 21.

lOlIbi-d., p. 23. loglE£§~’ 9' 29‘

37
for his "articles last sent were well considered by the
duke be not so well liked, nor thought to be in so good
order as they might have been;" On the other hand, "the
duke has had divers conferences with M. Fieschi touching
the same, and by that I can conceive the duke has [ordered]
M. Fieschi to set it in some good way. . .having thoroughly
considered the best and surest way to bring the points of
difference in such order as they may well be liked of by
the Queens Majesty and [Council];"

Fitz-William wrote again to Cecil on the 27th
reporting on a conference with Fieschi and an audience
with Alva.103 He stated that he and Fieschi had worked
out minor points of difference relative to piracy and the
valuation of cloth seized from the English merchants. He
told Cecil that Alva had chosen to ignore all differences
except the price of cloth and in so doing caused Fieschi
to be not a "little abashed and much grieved in his mind;"

There seems to have been a bit of jealousy between
d'Assonleville and Albornoz, Alva's secretary, through
whom it was necessary to go in order to reach Alva. As
Fitz-William reported to Cecil on February 1:

M. d'Assonleville sent for me. . .and [said] that
[he] had orders from the duke to talk with me
touching that [which] I had been to his Excellency
for and how to [d'Assonleville] I declared I had
proceeded with the secretary, Albornoz, from the

beginning, and [he] seemsg not to like well of the
manner of his dealings.

 

loulbid., p. 44.

m

103Ibid.,pp. 39ff.

38
In a second interview with d'Assonleville which he
reported to Cecil on February 6, it was hinted by d'Asson—
leville that Alva had chosen another person to represent

his interests in the forthcoming negotiations in London.105

'"I would have had the name of the person at [sic] M.
d'Assonleville but he would not declare it," reported Fitz-
William, "but parting from him I met one who had understood
[he] is M. de Zwevegham."

On February 11 Fitz-William wrote Cecil,"I understand
M. Fieschi has been commissioned with all to come with [de
Zwevegham] and has alleged certain excuses not to come,

yet it is thought in the end that he will accomplish the

,106

duke's request.’ Fitz-William also told Cecil that

Alva had relaxed the requirement of passports for merchants
in the Low Countries.

The duke is contented that the Queens Majesty's
subjects shall pass without any passports through
these Low Countries. There has been made suit for
passports, and the duke's answer has been that they
shall need none.‘. .at Dunkirk there are divers
English merchants passed without passport[s].

Fitz-William's hope that Fieschi would come received
a filip as he reported to Cecil from Bruges on February 25:

The duke has sent for M. Fieschi and had declared
unto him that he must in any way prepare himself

to go to England to end the matter which he has so
well.begun to set in good way, and that the going

of M. de Zwevegham be not lett [gig] unto him, whose
commission did not extend so far, but that he must
be directed by M. Fieschi.1O

 

V

106Ibid., p. 56. 107Ibid., p.'7a

M "n.—

105Ibid., p. 52.

39
On May 9 Alva wrote de Spes that Fieschi was coming

to London.108

de Zwevegham had proceeded Fieschi to
London, arriving there in March. At that time information
was had at the Vatican that the'"commissaries had crossed
to England to settle the question of trade, of which there
is great hope;"109
In letters to Philip on July 14, 1571, de Spes

reported that Fieschi had nearly reached agreement with
the English merchants dealing in Flanders but was having
difficulty in arriving at a satisfactory agreement with
those dealing direct with Spain, "for they are asking for
a great deal more than was taken from them."110 Agreement
was reached on the valuation of the property but "all these
are difficult points when dealt with by English commis-
sioners and councillors [who are] naturally greedy;" de
Spes was now completely disillusioned by the Council's
tactics in dealing with Fieschi.

These people are very impertinent [and] almost dis-

missed ]Fieschi] for good, rejecting the settlement

he thought he had made. They threatened him and

told him the Queen did not mean to return [the

money] for 7 years to come, so that [his] intention

of preserving the settlement of the points still

pending. . .must fall through. They dismissed
Fieschi telling him he must prove that the Queen

 

r v v fifi w

108Ibid., p. 129. In the same letter Alva advised
de Spes not to meddle in the internal affairs of England,
i.e. Mary Stuart and the Catholic faction.

10993;, Rome, 1, 392, no. 759.
110%. span. 1568-1579, p. 324, no. 266.

40
took the moneyin cash. Her officers refused to
give any [more] information. I haye now less hope
of these people than ever. .
In order to strengthen Spain's bargaining position
de Spes suggested that attempts be made to capture the
ships sailing for Hamburg, as he expressed it, "so as to
equalize the advantage these people now have in the value
of the goods detained.“112 But de Spes hopes were com-
pletely chilled by a letter from Philip in August in which
he said,"I do not believe the English have any attention
[gig] of bringing restitution about;" de Spes' despair
plummeted to the lowest depths as he wrote Philip in
September that there was not only a possibility of his
being "expelled" from England but that he had filed protests
against the piratical activities in the Channel with the
Court. '"Lord Cobham has been ordered in the future to
provide against such disorders. It wi11 all be in vain,
however, as it hitherto has been.“114
From Brussells on September 17 came a letter to the
vatican which explained in part why the negotiations were
so protracted:
From England is returned the Genoese Thomas Raggio
Fieschi, the principal merchant in Antwerp, who

was sent to England to adjust the differences; he
says he finds little there to stand in the way of

 

lll
Ibid.,Pp. 330ff, no. 273. ll2Idem., p. 331.

ll31bid., p. 334, no. 275.

llALIbidU p. 339, no. 280.

41

an arrangement, and that as to the marriage of the
Queen with M. de Anjou, that matter will go no
further, for he says that the negotiation is but a
pretense on the part of the English to enable them
to condescend the more readily to an adjustment of
the differences with these countries to their advan-
rage.ll

On November 5 de Zwevegham wrote Alva that Elizabeth
had announced she was going to sell the merchandiseand that

he was able to obtain a delay of only ten days pending the

return of Fieschi.116 Alva answered de Zwevegham on

November 10 in conciliatory terms:

I1 a samble convenir [pour mettre une fois fin a)
cest affaire] d'accepter ce pourgectdes Anglois
en y changeant altérant et corrigeant aucuns poincts
qui ont semble totallement necessaires lpour mettre
les choses en égalite en tous poincts.l

Alva also advised Elizabeth that he was supplying Fieschi

with credentials which would authorize him to negotiate with

 

115Cal. Rome, I, 459, no. 834. Lettenhove, VI, 178.
Fieschi left de Zwevegham in London on September 9 and
.returned to Alva with a proposed treaty and to get further
instructions. The negotiations for the marriage of Eliza-
beth to the Count of Anjou, brother to the King of France,
while an important part of England's foreign policy, are
not relevant here. They may be followed in Cal. Span.
1568-1579, p. 288, e£_passim.

 

116Lettenhove, VI, 207. de Spes wrote Philip on
November 29 that Leicester had told de Zwevegham "they
would wait 3 days longer for Thomas Fieschi and, after that,
would at once proceed to sell the merchandise. (§§$.:

Span. 1568-1579, p. 350, no. 290.)

 

117Lettenhove, VI, 211. A letter dated November 8
from the Merchant Adventurers at Hamburg discloses their
anxiety at the length of the negotiations: "I am sorry
the conclusion of agreement betwixt the Low Countries and
us does so slakly proceed. I doubt the Company shall as
yet have no traffic hither, wherefore I could gladly under-
stand your opinion whether it were good to remove to Emden."

 

42

full authority on the question of restitution.118

de Spes
advised Alva on November 16 that the arrival of Fieschi
was awaited with great impatience.119 On November 22
Antonio Fogozo wrote Prince Ruy Gomez de Silva that'"on the
day the goods were to be sold news came that Fieschi was
at Calais.“120 In the meantime, Alva instructed de Zweveg-
ham to negotiate for restitution of those goods seized
since December 22, 1568, "usant par avant de toutes raisons
et persuasions que pourrez;"l2l
The meeting of Alva and Fieschi had brought forth
proposals which Cecil and the Council did not view as
satisfactory for, as de Spes wrote Philip on December 21,
‘"they are keeping Fieschi in suspense without giving him
a reply and indeed hardly take time to discuss the

“"122 '"Both he and de Zwevegham are now suspicious

123

matter.
that they are being deceived;“ wrote de Spes to Alva.
Alva in turn replied, "as regards the negotiations of de

Zwevegham and Fieschi I have written [to them] telling

 

118 11
Ibid., p. 217. 91bid., p. 219.

1209-21. Span. 15684579. p. 353. no- 291-

 

121Lettenhove, VI, 234.

 

1220341. ,Sme' 1568-1579,pp, 357ff, no. 296.

fi

 

 

 

l231bid., p. 361, no. 298.

43
them to await the document which these people are going to
give them because. . .it is His Majesty's wish to settle.
the matter as well as possible and close this incident of
the seizure5"124_

With the expulsion of de Spes125 the negotiations
were once again in a state of suspension. Cecil informed
the Merchant Adventurers, the Staplers, and the Steelyard
on January 7, l572,that negotiations with de Zwevegham and
Fieschi had fallen through and as a Consequence of Alva's
having sold the seized English goods for the past two years
Elizabeth would proceed to sell the Spanish goods in her
possession.126

Fieschi wrote to Secretary Albornoz127 that since

negotiations were in suspension they be given permission

 

124Ibid., p. 326. no. 300.

125de Spes was called to the Council on December 14,
1571 (Cal. span. 1568-1579,pp. 356r, no. 295). Cecil,
acting as spOkesman, charged de Spes with encouraging the
Northern rebels and urging Philip and Alva to make war on
England, and ordered him to leave within three days. de
Spes refused to leave without orders from Alva or Philip.
Despite his protests he was put in the custody of Sir Henry
Knollys and conducted to Dover. He arrived in Calais on
January 28.

126Calendar of State Pa ers Foreign Series of the
Reign of Elizabethfl572-l574 greserved'inthe State Paper
DepartfiEnE 2: Her Ma est 's PubliCTRecord‘CTfiCe; ed: Allan
James Grosby (ECHdon, 1876),7No. l6.’ Hereafter: 'Qal.
Foreign‘l572—1574.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

127Ca1. Span. 1568-1579, p. 372, no. 306. These
letters, eXtracts'onlyof7Which are published, are dated
7th, 8th, 18th, 2lst January, and 4th and 6th February,

1572.

 

 

44
to leave with de Spes as they could do nothing further.
Fieschi also told Albornoz that he had been approached by
a‘"Secretary" to the Ccuncil who informed him that Eliza-
beth had ordered the sale of the detained goods and had
given four reasons for doing so: First, so as not to
damage them further; second, to follow Alva's example;
third, to pay the claims to her subjects resulting from
Alva's actions; fourth, because neither he, Fieschi, nor
de Zwevegham'"had powers to arrange;" But if Philip should
think it fit to re-open trade, Elizabeth must cease aiding
the rebels, in which case it would be well to ignore the
sale of the goods since there were English goods over
300,000 crowns in value detained within Spain and.Flanders
and from the sale of these goods Philip's subjects could
be recompensed for their losses.128

Alva directed de Zwevegham on February 8 to ask
audience with Elizabeth in order to find out what her

129

intentions were. Elizabeth willingly granted the audi-

ence on the 16th, a summary of which de Zwevegham reported

130

to Alva on the 19th. Elizabeth‘"rép6ta la chanson

 

128cf Calendar of State Papers Foreign Series of the
Reign of Elizabeth 1571—1572 Preserved in the"State Paper
Department? Her Mafiest' Ts Public Record ”Office, ed. Allan
James CrBsbyFKEEHdon, 1874),'N6C7124T"de Zwevegham wrote
Elizabeth on February 18, 1572, that whereas Philip was
holding English goods to the value of 300,000 crowns, she
was holding Spanish goods to the value of 800,000 crowns.
Hereafter: Cal. Foreign 1571-1572.

129Lettenhove, VI, 311. l3OIbid., p. 317.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

45
ancienne pour excuser la vente des biens des subjects de
sa Majest6;"
On February 22 de Zwevegham was summoned to the
Council and told that his staying in England was contingent
upon his not‘“. . .following in the crooked footsteps of

'"131 The Council further informed him that all

de Spes.
points under discussion would be reduced to two; pirates
and the alleged aid given to them by the English, and
troubles growing out of the arrests of goods and persons.
de Zwevegham was reminded that the Queen had issued sundry
proclamations against pirates in which she warned her sub-
jects against buying from them, victualing them, or other-
wise aiding them in any way.

In March Antonio de Guaras, the merchant acting as
unofficial Spanish ambassador,132 was approached by an
agent from Cecile office who informed him that the Queen
and Council were quite willing to come to an agreement,
and if de Guaras were to inform either Philip or Alva, the
way would be opened whereby de Guaras and Burghley could
work out the basis for settlement. This offer and an

ensuring interview with Burghley were reported by de Guaras

to Philip.

 

w vv

131931} Epreign 1571-I5ZE, No. 128.

 

 

132From the expulsion of de Spes to the coming of
Don Bernando de Mendoza in 1578 there was no resident
Spanish ambassador in England (Cal. Span. 1568-1579, p. 376
and note). 7 ‘

 

 

 

46

I said in your Court, in Flanders and here, he,
Cecil, was much looked up to in affairs, and con-
sequently was the more bound to conduct them to a
good end, as he could if he pleased, whereupon he
answered me with an oath that if it had not been

for him the late suspension of relations would have
ended in an open rupture, and Flanders would have
felt the effects in acts rather than words [and] if
the business came to an open rupture the Queen of
England would display an amount of strength that-
would surprise some people, but he answered me that
the Queen and Council being desirous of quietude if
I conveyed this good feeling to your Majesty and the
duke of Alva, I should find that I had not acted
lightly, but with all the weight his word would give
me. . .everything tends tothe belief that Burghley's
declaration is sincere.

Philip's and Alva's reactions to Burghley's offer
were satisfactory as de Guaras in a letter dated April 8 to
Alva reported Burghley seemed pleased at the good will ex-

pressed by Philip and Alva.

 

133Ibid.,pp. 376ff, no. 314. de Guaras also wrote
in the same letter "two months ago a third person came to
speak to me. . .saying that it would be a [benefit to
Philip] if some agreement could be arrived at respecting
the present dissension." This would indicate that de Guaras
had been approached sometime in January and that the nego-
tiations conducted by Cecil and Elizabeth with Fieschi and
de Zwevegham since then had been a mere sham. In a second
letter dated April 7 (ibid.,pp. 379f, no. 317) de Guaras
informed Alva of a sudden illness that had overtaken Cecil
and of his fears for Cecil's life: "If this man dies, it
will be very unfortunate for the purpose which he has
declared to me. It is true that hitherto he has undoubtedly
been the enemy of peace and tranquility for his own bad
ends, but I am convinced [that] he is now well disposed,
which means the Queen and the Council are so, because he
and no one else rules the whole of the affairs of state.
God grant that if it be for His service he may live. I
will advise your Excellency if he does so;" As did de Spes,
de Guaras put the cart before the horse. Elizabeth ruled.
In the final analysis Cecil bowed to his sovereign's will.

47

I could assure him that neither his Majesty nor your
Excellency ever thought of any thing but concord. He
replied that it was certainly quite natural for
friendship to exist between England, Spain, and
Flanders, and, entering more into detail on the ques-
tion of the origins of the dissension and the remedies
therefor, he spoke of this much to be desired concord
being established after the most just possible resti—

tution had been made. . .the opening of the trade and
the restitgfiion of all things to their previous
position.

While Cecil continued to treat with de Guaras secretly,
he and Elizabeth maintained the facade of officially treating
with de Zwevegham. Finally on April 19, 1572, the Council
told de Zwevegham that his commission from Philip was not
sufficient for him to treat of the arrests, the restitution
of goods, and the restoration of intercourse.135, The Council
further charged that Fieschi, "a Genoese and no subject of
[Philip]" had inserted, with de Zwevegham's permission,
articles into the proposed treaty'"concerning certain moneys
pretended to belong to certain merchants of Genoa" which had
no bearing on the treaty. de Zwevegham was wasting his and
the Council's time, it was charged, for to treat with his

present commission "cannot be but frivolous and vain" as

 

l3ulbid., p. 381, no. 318.

135Lettenhove, VII, 387. Animosity was growing
between de Zwevegham and de Guaras as the former felt his
efforts were not being appreciated. de Zwevegham wrote ’
Alva on April 11 that he considered de Guaras to be°"impru-
dent" in his conduct of the negotiations (ibid., p.
370). de Guaras wrote Alva that he did not Believe de
Zwevegham should be told of his, de guaras', talks with
Cecil (ibid;, p. 374). '

 

48

the two sovereigns concerned would not be obliged to
observe that which they had not authorized. de Zwevegham
was also told by the Council that it had been directed by
Elizabeth to say that if any commissioner were sent by
Philip to negotiate on the points outlined, for a two month
period no Spanish ship that put into an English port by
reason of "tempest, contrary winds, or for manifest lack
of victuals [would be] stayed or arrested." This was to
be provisional upon Philip's offering reciprocal privileges
for English merchants in his dominions. de Zwevegham was
also told that he had permission to quit the realm whenever
he chose to do 30.136
A possible shift in the balance of power between
Spain and France was the reason for the sudden change from
an attitude of hostility to one of conciliation and com-
promise on the part of England. In a memorial of June 3,
1572, the "politique" Burghley set down his thoughts on
the topic.
If it appears that [Alva] is not able to defend his
master's countries from the French and that they
begin to possess any part of them especially the
maritime parts, then it is likely the French. . .may
be to[o] potent neighbors for us. If the French
proceed to possess the maritime coasts and the fron-
tiers it seems to be good that. . .the duke of Alva
were informed secretly of the Queens Majesty's dis-

position to assist the King, his master by all
honorable means she might. . .so as it appear[s]

........

 

136de Zwevegham applied to Cecil for his passport
on April 25 (Cale Foreign 1571-1572, no. 397) and took the
occasion to congratulate him on being created Lord Burghley.

 

 

49
to her that he will discharge his subjects of their
intolerable oppressions. . .and continue with Her
Majesty the ancient league for amity and traffic.137

As summer gave way to fall, de Guaras carried on nego-
tiations with Burghley, Elizabeth, and the Council firmly
convinced in his own mind that Elizabeth and Burghley
desired peace. On October 6 he sent Alva the details of
two interviews which he had with Burghley.138 He reported
that Burghley "seemed pleased" when told that Alva wished
to settle the differences. ““I delivered all my message
and he, with great delight, said he hoped God would pardon
those who had been the cause of this dissension, and that
the Queen was most willing to come to a settlement."139
de Guaras quoted Burghley as saying in the second interview:

As the Queen greatly desires this accord as well as

my self and others. . .I must tell you in a friendly
way that the Queen and ourselves cannot help suspecting
that your King is not moved by the same goodwill to a

friendly settlement but rather leans toward dissen—
sion.l -

 

137Lettenhove, VI, 420. de Guaras reported to Alva
on June 30"that Elizabeth had been offered Flushing by the
Guise but said she would take it only to return it to
Philip (ibid., p. 434).

 

138Ca1. span. 1568-1579, p. 417. Burghley told de
Guaras that—the Queen and Council were receiving many come
plaints from English who fell victim to the Inquisition.
"I told him. . .there was no tribunal in existence more
just and merciful than the Inquisition," was the reply.

 

l39Ibid.,Pp. 417ff, no. 351-

1beIdem., p. 418.

m—In

50

When de Guaras assured Burghley of Philip's sincerity
Burghley replied that "such suspicion ought not to be
entertained and [that] the commerce of this country with
Spain and Flanders should be to the advantage of a11.'"lb'l

On October 12 de Guaras wrote Alva that he believed
Elizabeth.sincere1y wanted to carry out the treaty which
was important to the state and to the common people of
England.142 He noted dissension in the Council over whether
England should favor Spain or France, but "the best council-
lor of them.all is Lord Burghley as he follows the will and
tendency of the Queen which is toward concord.“143

de Guaras again wrote Alva on November 4144 reporting
on an interview with Burghley in which the latter expressed
his opinion that the ports could be opened on the 29th of
December if agreed to by Alva and Philip, adding that
Elizabeth and the earl of Leicester were in favor of this.
'"It may be supposed that these folks wish forfipeace more
than ever, although they want to settle it with great con-

sideration and honor for themselves,‘ wrote de Guaras to

Alva on November 9, "but as they have no letters from your

 

r w iv v

lulIdem., p. 419.

luQLettenhove, VII, p. 548.

 

143Idem.

 

1441bid., p. 570.

51

Majesty [sigj which they so much desire they are still
suspicious that they will not be received into your friend-
ship."145

On November 18 de Guaras wrote Alva that Elizabeth
not having received a reply from Philip to her proposal
for opening the ports, was in despair for fear that the
negotiations would again be disrupted.146

On January 1, 1573, Alva wrote to de Guaras in reply
to Elizabeth's proposition.147 Alva would establish a

protocol for a two year period during which negotiations

to resolve all differences would be carried on. He pro-

 

posed both parties agree to a status quo ante December
1568, except that no asylum would be granted to those who
had taken up arms or plotted against either government.

In other words, Elizabeth, if she agreed, would put herself
on record as being officially against extending aid to the
rebellious Netherlands. Further, Alva suggested, the com-
mission be established with power not only to settle all

‘"cite articles besides

points of difference but also to
those here" in order to provide that differences would

never again arise.

 

fifi

 

145Cal, Span. 1568:1579, p. 438, no. 36“-

146Lettenhove, VI, 585.

 

ll‘rflbidu p. 615. There is some question as to the
correct date of this document.

52

Burghley answered de Guaras in February.148'"

I am
not fully satisfied by your words [you] being but a private
man without authority from the King," he wrote, but per-
ceiving that de Guaras was negotiating in good faith,

added '"I have thought having considered of your speeches
and your writing, to note unto you my opinion;" Burghley
indicated his approval of opening the ports on a certain
day but suggested postponing the opening to the first of
December so that everyone concerned could be apprised.

The convention concluded at Nimwegen on March 15,

1573, settled the queStion of trade resumption for a two

 

148Ibid., p. 642. Burghley suggested the inclusian
of an article which would permit freedom of religion for
citizens of each country trading and living within the
other. He would have provision made for extradition of
those who "have committed any crime which is punishable by
death in their native country;" He was concerned, too,
over the conduct of ambassadors. The points are summarized
by Burghley with "my opinion added to same" (ibid., p. 647)
and conclude: '"Finally, considering both the said Prince
are far [apart] as such expedition cannot be used, as it
is known by their former mutual messages and letters, they
are both disposed to have no time [lost] for the restoration
of their ancient amity and for the intercourse of merchan-
dise betwixt their subjects, it has been found good that
the contents of these former articles should be reduced
into writing as they are here above expressed, and that,
for either place, some such as are of counsel and credit
with either of them should for more expedition sign, sub-
scribe and seal the same, for which purpose I, William
Lord Burghley, Knight of the Order of the Garter, Master
of the Court of war, etc. with the knowledge, consent, and
allowance of my sovereign Lady and Queen, Elizabeth, and
by the grace etc., do subscribe and seal the same promising
on the faith that I bear to Almighty God, and the duty to
my said Lady and Queen that I will to the utmost of my
power, further and advance the due observation of all the
contents of the former article in all parts;"

53
149

year period. The only remaining question was the
reckoning of losses sustained by both Spanish and English

150 This was settled by the Treaty of Bristol

merchants.
on August 30, 1574.151 The Spanish were awarded 100,076

pounds, 17 shillings, 11 pence less 11,000 pounds for

 

w ‘1 VV V v

ll‘tglbi'dq p. 689. '"L'éntrecours est retabli pour un
deuxannées,aidn de regler tous les anciens différends.
Aussi longtemps que dueront les negociations, le roi d'-
Espange et la reine d'Angleterre s'engagent mutuellement
a ne point soutenir les rebelles et a reprimer les cor-
saires;"

150The negotiations may be traced in Lettenhove, VII,
700, at passim. On April 15 Alva wrote to Elizabeth from
Nimwegen,‘ j ay recu. . .les articles signés et séecles par
Milord Burghley, de l'accord que, par commandement du Roy.

. .j'ay faiet negocier avec ledit Milord entre V0s Majestés,
dont je me suis infiniement resjouy" (ibid., p. 710).

The power to negotiate the settlement was conferred
upon de Zwevegham and Jean de Boisschot, "counseillier et
advocat fiscal de vostre conseil en Brabant" (ibid., p. 11).
They were cautioned not to haggle over who was theiirst to
arrest "pour ne perdre temps en choise vaine et de piéca
disputée et monstrée au contraire" (ibid.,Pp. 13ff).

The papal nuncio in France wrote to the Cardinal of
Como on April 24 that there were rumors of an accord between
Spain and England, but'"nevertheless many are of the opinion
that [Elizabeth] dallies with these negotiations to gain
time and shape her policy as in view of the course of
events in France and Flanders she shall deem expedient"
(Cal. Rome, j[[, p. 106, no. 185).

—_"' ETTEabeth's formal proclamation of the renewal of
commercial intercourse was given on April 30, 1573 (Cal.
For. 1572-1574, NO. 936).

'7‘" Philip's confirmation of the protocol between
Burghley and Alva was issued on June 8 (ibid., no. 1021).

 

151The Privy Council met at Bristol on August 15, 19,
and 20 of 1574 (Dasent, VIII, 282ff). There is no refer-
ence in the minutes to the settlement.

Elizabeth was also at Bristol on the 20th. (Prog-
resses and Public Processions of queenAElizabeth, ed. John
Nicholsj’3 volsi'[London, 1823]: I, 408). ‘Again there is
no reference to the treaty. There is a notation by Burgh-
ley in Ha es and Murdin, II, p. 776 of the treaty but
nothing further.

 

54
expenses due Philip, while the English received 85,096
pounds, 17 shillings, 11 pence less 17,000 pounds for

expenses due Elizabeth.l52

William Cecil was not a mercantilist despite his
seemingly pro-mercantilist speeches in Commons, his mem-
oranda on trade, and his support of sumptuary legislation.
His whole philosophy and action were conditioned by the
political events of his time. He aimed at a policy of

153 If his

potentcy at sea in order to preserve the realm.
support was given to those expedients which seemed to be
mercantilist it was because they seemed to him to be the

best for the time.

 

V V wfi

152Hatfield MSS, II, 81, no. 217. Not all the Neth-
erlanders"'weléomed’the resumption of trade with unalloyed
joy. The Merchant Adventurers reported on May 19, 1573,
that Jacques Taffyn, treasurer of Flushing, had said that
Mall the kindness [the English] ever showed [us] was in
respect of [their] own private gain '(Lettenhove, VI, 738. )
Taffyn charged that Elizabeth had cut of? military supplies
to the Flushingers so as to force them to "submit them-
selves unto [her] protection" and would have used her
soldiers "to have rendered [Flushing] unto the hands of the
duke of Alva" so she could make peace with Philip. '"The
common talk among them of Flushing is that the Queen has.
made this accord of traffic with the King of Spain of pur-
pose so that they thereby might be overthrown," wrote the
Merchant Adventurers. But the Flushingers and the other
Netherlanders appreciated the quality of the now obtainable
English cloths as Min every town. . .we found plenty of
English cloth. . .which came directly out of England," ad-
mittedly hidden in barrels so as to avoid English export
taxes.

153Sir John A. Cla ham, A Concise Economic Histor of
Britain (Cambridge, 1951 , p. 279'. A. V'. Judges, “The Idea
of a Mercantile State," Transactions of the Royal Historical
Society, XXI (Fourth Series), p. 4lff.

 

 

 

55

In order to keep the realm inviolate it was necessary
to pacify the Scottish border and, insofar as possible,
maintain the balance of power between France and Spain.

The ancient enmity between England and Scotland took on
new dimensions while Mary Stuart was on the Scottish

throne for religion was thrown into the arena of English-
Scottish relations. Mary Stuart connived with Philip to
keep England's northern border in a state of unrest.154
This action taxed both the material and financial resources
of an England which was already weakened by the excesses

of the reign of Henry VIII and which had been governed
ineptly in the reigns of Edward VI and Mary I.

The reign of Mary I with Philip II of Spain as her
husband had cost England Calais. By his marital connection
Philip was able to enlist English troops in his war against
France. The loss of Calais still rankled with the English
as Cecil in his memorial of 1569 expressed it thus:

As for the amity of the house of Burgundy, or Spain,
towards the Queen's Majesty, or to the Crown of
England, the special thing of great moment is to be
considered, that when for the King's [Philip] sake
England was brought into war with France and Scotland
in which wars France got away the town of Calais,

the king of Spain would enter into no war with Scot-

land, though he were many times thereto solicited.
And at the making of the peace at [Cateau-Cambresis]

154The attempt by Roberto Ridolfi to foment rebel-
lion and place Mary Stuart on the throne of England may be
traced by correspondence in Cal. Span. 1568-1579, p. 111,
no. 82, et passim. That of Thomas Stuckeley in Ireland
may be traced ibid., p. 159, no. 102 at passim.

 

 

56
where he recovered for himself all manner of things

. .neverthe less [he] would not employ his labors

nor his reatness at that time to recover Calais for
England.

Because of the proximity of England's shores to both
France and the Netherlands and the facility with which
England could be invaded by either nation, it behooved
England to see that neither one grew strong at the expense
of the other. This factor accounts for the shift in diplo—
macy in 1572 on the part of Cecil when he sent for de
Guaras to reopen negotiations for the resumption of trade):56
Elizabeth announced her intention to aid Spain by returning
Flushing to Alva for the sole purpose of off-setting the
strength of France.157

Philip's policy which caused alarm in England was
the ruthless pacification of the Netherlands under Alva
with the use not only of military force but also the office
of theinquisition.158 This was abhorrent to Cecil not

only on grounds of human decency but also on grounds of

religion and politics.159

 

W V v

155Haynes and Murdin, I, p. 583.

156Cal. Span. 1568-1579, p. 376.

#

 

157Lettenhove, VI, 420.

 

158For a portrait of Philip and his policy see
Martin A. S. Hume's Philip I; of Spain (London, 1899).

159Cecil referred to the Catholic Church aS'"the
tyranny of Rome (Haynes and Murdin, I, 580).

57

This was the field of sixteenth century international
politics on which Cecil and his contemporaries had to
ensure protection for England from the internal and external
forces arrayed against her. Cecil's commercial program
which was designed to accumulate wealth to protect the
realm was not original in any sense of the word. He had-
many precedents in the field of statutory law to draw from.
It cannot be said that he personally had anything to do
with the passage of each statute during the period of his
service to the Crown, but so marked with his work is this
period that unless evidence shows his open disapproval of
certain legislation he must have given at least tacit
consent to most of it.

It is impossible to give a simple definition of
mercantilism.160 There are, however, some fundamental
tenets and ideas which can be stated and examined. First,
exports must be greater than imports because money is to.
be valued for itself.. Cecil supported the idea of exporting
more than importing but for vastly different reasons than
merely gaining wealth for the realm. He decried the im-
portation of more wine because "wine enricheth France" was
his argument. Long before Cecil presented his argument

Henry VI was cognizant of the same thing. In the statute

 

160Eli Heckesher, "Mercantilism," Economic History
Review, November 1936, p. 44ff.

 

58
4 a 5 Henry VII p.10161 entitled g3 Act Against Bringing

 

Into This Realm Wine In Foreign Ships, it was expressed

 

 

in these terms:

That where great [de]minishing and decay has been

now of late time of the navy Of this realm of

England, and idleness of mariners within the same.

this noble realm within short process of time,

without reformation be had therein, shall not be

of ability nor of power and strength to defend

itself.
The statute specified that wine was to be imported only in
English, Irish, Welsh, or Berwick ships manned by crews
from those places. This statute was confirmed by 23 Henry
VIII c.7162 and revived again by 32 Henry VIII 0.14;
4 & 5 Henry VII 0.10 was repealed during the reign-of
Edward VI by the enactment of 5 a 6 Edward VI c.1816“ for
the express purpose of having "wines at more easy prices"
since "wine. . .be daily sold at such excessive prices as
has not before been seen in this realm and the navy of
the realm thereby never the better maintained;"

Cecil's concern with the effect that drinking of

wine would have upon the economic stability of the laboring

class was preceeded by that of Parliament in the seventh

year of Edward VI's reign. There was enacted that year

 

jfi

161The Statutes a; Lar e of En land and 9£_Great
Britain,154_vols.(Eondon, 1762-18 , II, 745f. Hereafter:
Statutes.

162Ibid., III, 115. l631bid., III, 305.

164Ibid., 111, 592p.

59
7 Edward VI c.5165 entitled An Act to Avoid Great Prices

 

and Excess of Wine. As stated in the act a great many new

 

 

taverns were appearing in the "backlanes, corners, and
suspicious places within the city of London;" Price
ceilings were established on French wines and no one was
permitted to have more than ten gallons on his premises
unless he met with certain property qualifications or was
of the nobility.

Decay and decrease of the navy was a problem which
beset every English monarch from Richard II to Elizabeth I.

166

Cecil's proposal in the Commons of 1563 to make Wednes-
day an additional fish day was simply a new device to solve

an old problem. The navy in time of war was dependent

upon the merchant and fishing fleets for personnel and
ships.167 5 Eliz. c.5,168 which became known as "Cecil's
Fast," forced an increase in the domestic consumption of

fish and limited the importation of fish from foreign coun—
tries. It caused the size of the fishing fleet and the number
169

of men engaged in fishing to increase.

 

l651bid., III, 612ff.

l66Cal. Dom. Eliz., XXVII, no. 71 given in full in
Tawney and Power, 11, 104ff.

 

 

167Michael Lewis, The History 93 the British Navy
(Penguin Series,l957), Ch. V. - '

 

 

168Statutes, IV, 207f.

169921. ppm. Eliz, CVII, no. 67.

 

60
In 1381 Richard II had had the problem of how to
increase the navy. His effort was the passage of 5 Richard

II st. 1 c.2170

which forbade the importing or exporting of
merchandise by English subjects in foreign ships. A later
statute, 14 Richard II 0.6171 required English merchants

to use only English ships "so that the owners of said

ships do take reasonable gains for freight of same." 3
Edward IV 0.1172 permitted only aliens in England to use
alien ships.

The protection of infant industries by law and govern-
ment franchise is a second.teneti of mercantilism. The
patent issued through Cecil's office to the operators of
the copper mine at Keswick173 was granted not so that more
copper could be exported but so that England could develop
her own arms manufacture and thereby counterbalance the
threat of invasion which was constantly poised by Spain
and France.

Examination of the statutes enacted in reigns previous

to Elizabeth's show that restrictions were placed on export

of metals essential to war, not to create a scarcity and

 

170Statutes, II, 45f. This was relaxed somewhat by
6 Rich. II 0.8 (ibid., 65f) which permitted the use of
foreign ships ifEnglish ships Were not available.

171Ibid., 150. 172Ibid., p. 610.

173021. Dom. Eliz., XVIII, no. 18.

 

 

_ 61
thereby increase their price, but to make certain that
England had them in sufficient quantity in the event of
hostilities. As far back as the reign of Edward III re-
strictions were placed on the export of iron. 2&3

Edward III c.5174

forbade this under penalty of double the
price of the iron so shipped. 2 Henry V St. 2 c.6175 for-
bade the shipping of tin to placed other than the English
staple at Calais. Charges were made in the statute that
tin was being transported to Flanders, Holland, Zeland,
and ports in France. The statute forbade this without
license. 28 Henry VIII c.8176 forbade the
shipping of brass, lattan, and copper, and 33 Henry VIII
c.7177 specifically mentioned that licensing had resulted
in the countries of Europe obtaining artillery. The
penalties incurred by violation of 33 Henry VIII 0.7 were
increased by 2 & 3 Edward VI c.37.178

Despite the vigilance of the customs officers guns
cast in England found their way into hostile hands as

Ralph Hogg, Elizabeth's iron founderer, reported to the

Privy Council on January 2, 1574:

 

174Statutes, I, 644. 175Ibid., II, 332.

176Ibid., III, 262.

177Ibid., p. 346p.

178Ibid., III, 555.

62

The names of furnaces that cast guns and shot of

iron [is] in.a paper hereto annexed. There is

above [400] tons cast yearly andthis will not be

sold or bought to remain within the realm, and if

there be not order taken there is more about to set

up works to cast guns both here and in Wales, and

they being cast will make sail one way 8r another,

either by lawful means or by stealth. 7

In his memorial of 1569 on the state of the realm

Cecil listed "lack of treasure"180 as one of the secondary
imperfections. Were he a mercantilist this would have
appeared near the top of his list for to a mercantilist
the having of gold and silver is the end to be desired.
There was no statute enacted during Elizabeth's reign
forbidding the transport of bullion out of the realm, but
there were many statutes passed forbidding the export of
bullion prior to Elizabeth's reign. None of these were
passed for reasons which could be called'"mercantilist;"
9 Edward III St. 2 c.l181 forbade the export of bullion
without the king's license "because we have learned that
divers people beyond the sea do endeavor themselves to
counterfeit our sterling money of England;" 5 Richard
II St.1 c.2182 permitted export only by license as "gold

and silver [are] carried out of said realm so that in

 

vw

179Cal. Dom. Eli§,, XCV, no. 16 given in full in
Tawney and Power; I, 262f.

 

 

180
Haynes and Murdin, I, 580ff.

181Statutes, I, 471 1831218-: II: ”3f'

63

effect there is scarce any thereof left." 2 Henry IV
c.5183 permitted merchant strangers to export only half of
the gold they obtained by trade while 2 Henry IV c.6184
forbade the circulation in the realm of Flemish and Scot-
tish coin "to avoid deciet." 2 Henry VI c.6185 restricted
export because as stated in the statute much bullion had
gone to Bourdeaux and Flanders enriching England's enemies.
4 and 5 Henry VII c.23186 revived 17 Edward c.13187 and,
Both of these were revived once by 1 Henry VIII p.13188 and
again by 7 Edward VI c.6.189

Social and economic stability of the body politic
was part of Cecil's program for with the passing of feudal-
ism there was greater freedom of choice on the part of the
individual Englishman as to how he would earn his living
and where he would place his allegiance. Elizabeth had no
standing army with which to coerce her subjects. The feudal
levy was a thing of the past.

190

To achieve stability in part 5 Eliz. c.6 which

forbade those with less than 3000 pounds income from buying

 

183Ibld.,PP~ 224?. lBuIbld., p. 225.
185Ibid.,pp. 379f. lBéiélén: P- 752-
187Ibid,,pp. 661f. 1881bid., III, 8.
189

Ibid., p. 616. 190Ibid., IV, 217.

w

64
on credit was enacted. The act precluded the majority
from engaging in overseas trade and literally forced them
to make a choice between being fishermen, tradesmen, or
tillers of the soil. In his paper against the importation
of more wine191 Cecil pointed out that tillage "which
should be favored above all labor in the realm" would be
reduced as more wine and less beer and ale were consumed.

5 Eliz. c .2192

provided that all lands tilled for four
years successively since 20 Henry 7 should be kept in

tillage. 13 Eliz. p.13193 entitled _A_n_ Act For the

 

Increase ngTillage and Maintenance of the Navy permitted

 

the export of wheat, rye, barley, malt,peas, and beans.
It was hoped that the increase in exports of foodstuffs
would increase the size of the navy.

The greatest monopolies of this period were the
overseas trading companies: the Staplers, the Steelyard,and
the Merchant Adventurers. The last seems to have been
expecially favored by Cecil as the correspondence from John

Marsh, head of the corporation, to Cecil is voluminouslgu

 

fi-vwwivw

191Cal. Dom. Eliz. XLI, no. 58 given in full in
Tawney_and Power, II, I24ff.

 

l928tatutes , Iv, . 129. 1931.b.1_d~ :PP~ 3121‘ f -

194Cal'. Dom. Eliz., XXXIII et passim. Hatfield MSS,
I, no. 1014. 'A petition from the—Merchant Adventurers to
the Council requesting restraint of trade with the Low
Countries has Cecil's notation on the margin "this stay
to be reiterated" (ibid., no. 1031).

 

 

65
and indicates that Cecil on more thafiwgccasion did a favor
for them; With their staple at Antwerp the Merchant
Adventurers not only aided the government in the solution
of fiscal problems but also assisted it in solving admin-
istrative ones as well.195

In 1568 the Merchant Adventurers were requested by
the government to promote lotteries established by royal
proclamation for the purpose of raising funds to repair

196

harbors. They served as paymasters for Elizabeth's
troops in the Low Countries in 1587 as they were directed
to pay the troops on a warrant from Leicester.197 Repay-
ment of loans such as theSe were made directly from the
royal treasury or, as was done in one instance, by the
government's granting the Merchant Adventurers the right

to collect the customs on cloths which they exported.198

As the amount of cloth exported by them in this case was
insufficient to pay the debt they petitioned the Privy
Council to have the balance paid in cash. The petition was
199

denied.

 

l95G. Unwin,'"The Merchant Adventurers Company in the
Reign of Elizabeth," Economic History Review; (1927), pp.

35ff.
196021. Dom; Eliz., XLVII, no. 13, 48.

 

197The Calendar of State Papers Domestic Series 9:
the Reigns effETizabethrand James 137Addenda'l580-1625, ed.
Mary7Anne_Everett'Greene'(London, 1872), XXX, no. lf723.

198

 

 

 

 

 

Cal. Dom. Eliz., XXXI, no. 9.

lgglbidu, LXXXI, no. 11.

66
By its very nature the grant of a monopoly forbade

others to infringe upon the privilege. As a monopoly had
been granted to certain merchants to trade with Spain the
Privy Council directed on August 10, l577,that the arti-
ficers and retailers of Bristol who had been and still were
engaged in the Spanish trade, were to cease such activity?00
When in the same month it was brought to the attention of
the Council that some of the Bristol,merchants had applied
for writs to have the charges of infringement heard in the
Queen's courts, the Council ordered the writs to be denied
and directed the Spanish company to deal out punishment as

it saw fit.201

Here again the government used a company
organized under a patent of monopoly to solve an adminis-
trative problem. I

These actions on the part of the Privy Council had
the net effect of limiting the volume of overseas trade
conducted by Englishmen. By restricting the trade to com-
panies formed under patents of monopoly, some of which
companies further restricted the operation of their own

202

members, the volume of return in the form of cash was

 

w w

200Dasent, X, 16.

201Ibid., p. 37.

202G. Unwin, "The Merchant Advenurers and the Cloth
Industry," Economic History Review, (1927), pp. 50ff.
E. Lipson, The Economic History 23 England, 3 vols (London,
1931), II,'214ff.

 

 

67
less than it would have been had the government permitted

everyone who desired to do so to engage in the trade.
Elizabeth I's predecessors had protected the Calais
Staple by statute and had even ordered its"removal" to
England.203 14 Richard II c.1204 provided that
aliens were to purchase English goods to the amount of one-
half the value of the goods imported by them. 14-Richard
II 0.2205 provided that aliens should take their,
profits from the realm in the form of staple commodities,
i.e.,wool, leather, woolfells, lead, tin, butter, cheese,
cloth, et cetera. .8 Henry V c.2206 protected the
Calais Staple by causing every "merchant stranger" having
wool shipped from England to elsewhere than Calais to pay
for eaCh saCk so shipped either one ounce of gold or its
equivalent in silver into the Mint. 8 Henry VI 0.17207
provided that no wool, woolfells, leather, lead, or tin
should be exported to any place other than Calais. Exception

to this was made in the cases for the merchants of the

Italian trading towns and the Burgesses of Berwick-on-Tweed.

 

w vi V V

203Statutes, I,pp. 7llf. The statute reproduced here,
43 Ed. III 0.1, provided for the "removal" of the Staple to
Kingston-on-Hull, St. Botolph, Yarmounth, Queensborough,
Westminster, Exeter, Winchester, and Bristol. Since the
Calais Staple was not lost by England until 1558 it meant
that the Staplers were to hold markets in these English
towns as well.

204Ibid., II, 148. 205Ibid., II, 148f.

206Ibid., II, 356. 207Ibid., II, 428.

*—

68
By the twenty-seventh year of Henry VI's reign so many
special licenses had been issued that the Crown's revenue
from the Calais Staple had decreased from 68,000 pounds
to 12,000 pounds.- 27 Henry VI c.2208 cancelled
all special licenses for five years from 1448-1449.

So powerful became some of the English merchants
trading in the London area during the reign of Henry VII
that they Charged merchants desiring to join their fellow-
ship some twenty pounds sterling as an entry fee. 0n
petition of merchants outside London 12 Henry VII 0.6209
which curtailed the power of the London merchants was en-
acted. The effects on trade of the uncontrolled activities
of the London merchants were recited in the statute. Since
the cloth industry was that by which "poor people have
most universally their living" and the London merchants
had undersold the non-London merchants by driving down
prices causing lessened production, the decay of towns,
along with which the "Navy of the land [is] greatly de-
creased and [de]minished," the London merchants were
ordered by the terms of the statute to charge no more than
ten marks sterling as a fee of admission.

The activities of Sir Thomas Gresham on behalf of
the government in this period lend! validity to the thesis

that Cecil's aims and policy were not mercantilist.

 

208

Ibid., II, 542. 2091bid., II, 788ff.

#—

69

(Eresham's assignment as Elizabeth's agent in the Low
(Sountries had a three-fold purpose: To borrow money for
'the realm and maintain the Queen's credit; to obtain arms
and munitions for defense; to transmit to Cecil intelli-
gence of military activities in the Low Countries.210 He
was instructed to communicate only with Cecil or in his
absence, Sir Thomas Parry.211

Gresham found that Elizabeth's credit with the Antwerp
merchants fluctuated as rumors circulated of English
military setbacks at the hands of the Scots assisted by
the French and Spanish. Writing to Cecil on June 16,
1560,212 he said, "I have talked with [many] of the Queen's
Majesty's creditors; and to be plain with you, every man
seeks to be paid. Whereunto I made answer. . .if this [aid
from Philip] had not chanced everyone should have been
paid;" Gresham told the creditors to wait six months longer
and they would be paid either in Antwerp or in Hamburg
where, as he continued his letter to Cecil, he wrote, "I
gave them to understand that the Queen's Majesty would
send so many cloths and kersies as should answer her high—

ness whole debts;"

 

210Burgon reprints much of the correspondence from
Gresham to Cecil taken from the Flanders Correspondence
State Paper Office which is not ayailable} GreSham took
'the opportunity presented to deter the Spanish by spreading
false rumors as to the strength of the English navy in 1560
as he wrote to Cecil on May 7, "I have given abroad that
[Elizabeth] has 200 ships in readiness, well armed" (ibid,
I, 295 .

211Ibid., p. 327.
21%Elanders Correspondence in Burgon, I, 299.

70.
He had described to Cecil on March 1, 1559 an in-
volved scheme for forcing a loan from the Merchant Adven-
turers at Antwerp.213 As a result Elizabeth obtained 30,000
pounds. The Merchant Adventurers asked only freedom to
use their shipS'"to make money for the Queen's service.M214
The success which attended Gresham's efforts in
raising money for the realm is shown by a letter to Cecil
on October 3, 1563,in which he said he had raised over
830.000 pounds.215 Where Edward VI and Mary I had been
accustomed to pay fourteen per cent interest Gresham had
by his efforts reduced the rate to twelve per cent for

Elizabeth.216 By September of 1566 Gresham had raised a

total of 1,100,000 pounds.217
Gresham had to resort to smuggling and falsification

of bills of lading in order to get arms and munitions out

 

213Ibid.,pp. 257ff. This also is in Cal. Dom. Eliz.,
XIX, no. 8, given in full in Tawney and Power, 11, 15U?TT

 

21493;. 22g. Eliz., XIV, no. 19. Through the negli-
gence of some port official the merchants put to sea in
August without loaning the money. In Burgon, I, 348f is
printed a letter from Elizabeth to Gresham explaining the
situation. She obtained her loan later in the year.

215Flanders Correspondence in Burgon, II, 31.

 

216Idem..pp. 32ff.

217Gresham to Cecil, September 8, 1566 in E22522,
II) 1590

71
of the Low Countries.218 He asked Cecil in October of 1559

to have a shipment of four barrels of gunpowder weighed in
secret at the Tower "for verily if it be known here
[Antwerp] the [smuggler] is in danger of his life.‘"219

Gresham knew the value of his work to the realm and
was not loath to put it in writing to Cecil. In August of
1562 he wrote concerning the purchase of munitions, "I will
not enlarge any further in the matter [by pointing out] what
treasure and strength it is to her majesty and her realm;
because I have been the doer thereof.‘"220

The possession of the money taken from Philip and

68221

Alva in 15 posed a problem for Cecil. To give it back

would only strengthen Spain. To hold it in the Tower would
serve no purpose. Gresham supplied the answer when he

wrote to Cecil on August 14, 1569, "I would wish the Queen's
Majesty to put it to use of some profit; as to mint it in

.n222

her own coin. Gresham's servant, Henry Clough,

 

Vfi—v V 1*

218Greshamused a code to signify the various types
of arms and munitions. In Burgon, I, 319ff is a description
of his code and a letter to Cecil dated May, 1560ltaken from
the Flanders Correspondence, in which he uses the code.

 

219Gresham to Cecil, October 1559, in Burgon, I, 3l8f.

220

Flanders Correspondence, August 9, 1562, in Burgon,
II, 10. ' fir WV

 

221021. span. 1568-1579, p. 88, no. 64 2.2 22.515.112-

 

 

222Landsdowne mss, XII, art. 8 in Burgon, II, 303f.

 

72
delivered five bags of Spanish rials to the Mint on Sept-
ember 13, 1569,to be made into English coin.223 On Feb-
ruary l5, 1570,Gresham, himself, delivered "62 bags of
Spanish rials into the hands of Mr. Thomas Stanley,
Treasurer of the Mint; with redelivery of the same from
the Mint in [English] money."224

Cecil had no long range, comprehensiVe commercial
policy in this period, 1568-1574, which could be labeled
'"mercantilist;" Certain aspects of his policy such as
those set forth in his memorandum of 1564 on the export
trade in cloth and wool,225 his arguments in favor of
establishing Wednesday as an additional fish day,226 and
his arguments against the importing of more wine227 have
in themselves certain tenets which are attributed to
the classical mercantilists of a later period. But exam-
ination of the political conditions of period 1568-1574
renders nugatory the thesis that they were mercantilist

in origin because of Cecil's alleged adherence to this

 

223Gresham to Cecil, September 15, 1569, from Lands-
downe MSS, XII, art. 11 in Burgon, II, 304ff.

 

224
Cal. Dom. Eliz., LXVI, no. 44. Oddly enough

there wasTEE gFEEt Haste on the part of Cecil to convert
all of the Spanish money into English coin. On March 7,
1571, Gresham again urged Cecil to convert the balance
which he estimated to be between 25 and 30,000 pounds
sterling (ibid., LXXVII, no. 30).

225Cal. Dom. Eliz., XXXV, no. 33 given in full in
Tawney and Power, II, 45ff.

2261bid., XXVII, no. 71, p. lO4ff.
2271bid., XLI, no. 58, p. 124ff.

 

73
policy. Cecil used these commercial weapons, some of which
were hoary with age, to gain peace and strength for England.

Cecil was not a theoretician in commercial matters.
What was done by him or received his support in commercial
matters was based on empiricism. In 1563 he could see that
England lacked ships and mariners with which to defend

herself.228

Citing that England customarily drew upon the
fishing fleets for crews to man vessels, he argued for the
increase in consumption of fish which would cause the em-
ployment of more sailors. By 1580 there was noted a decided
increase in the number of mariners in the fishing trade as
a result of 5 Eliz. 0.5.229

In arguing against the importation of more wine from
France,230 Cecil did not theorize that France stood to gain
by the then present policy. It was obvious that money was
going into France to pay for the wine and should be stopped
or lessened for fear France would use the money to wage
war against England. Cecil said as much.

To View the commercial policy of Cecil in this period
without taking into consideration the international polit-

ical conditions is to lose the true motive for his actions.

 

228mm,, XXVII, no. 71, pp. lO4ff.
229Ibid., cXLVII, no. 21. Statutes, IV, 207f-

230Cal. Dom. Eliz., XLI, no. 58, given in full in

Tawney and Power, II, 124ff.

 

74
It has been convenient for most economic historians to
label the whole Elizabethan period "mercantilist" as it
is quite difficult to assign with accuracy a specific date
when the concept of mercantilism arose. That certain
aspects of Cecil's policy were seized upon by the classical
mercantilists of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries
and embellished and refined by them is quite true. But
an examination of classical mercantilism is beyond the

scope of this essay.

BIBI. I OGRAPHI CAL ESSAY

76
Conyers Read's Bibliography QELBritish History: The

 

 

gpdor Period, 1485-1605 (Oxford, 1933) is the standard

 

bibliography for the history of Elizabeth's reign. Read's
systematic arrangement of materials on the period permits
the rapid location of the desired items.

Two sources of original documents and manuscripts
from which it was necessary to draw rather heavily are the

Calendar gflLetters and State Papers Relating £2 English

 

Affaips Preserved Principally 33 the Archieves 2; Simancas,

rv V fi—‘V

 

Vol. II, ed. Martin A. S. Hume (London, 1894) and Baron
Kervyn de Lettenhove's Relations Politique de§_Pays-Bas‘e§

de la Angleterre Sous la Regpe g2 Philippe II) 11 vols.

 

(Brussells, 1882-1900). The title of the latter work is
rather misleading for it is actually a collection of
original documents and manuscripts from both the Simancas
and Brussells archives and is not a secondary account. The
Spanish calendar is deficient in material pertaining to

the years 1572-1574. Happily this lack is not attendant

in the Lettenhove work. There is some duplication by each
of the other's material but for the most part the materials
in each tend to complement the other's so that taken to-
gether they give a wealth of materials arranged in chrono-
logical order.

The Calendar pf State Papers Domestic Series pf the

 

Reigps of Edward VI, Mary, Elizabeph, 1547'12802 ed. Robert

 

Lemon (London, 1856) is rendered less valuable than the

77
preceding works cited as it contains only the briefest

description of the contents of each document. The user
of this work must be cautioned against inaccuracies in
the index which while infrequent, are, nevertheless,
aggravating and misleading.

The Calendar 92 State Papers Qomestic Serie§_p£'£he

Reigps 23.?112222th-Efld James I, Addenda, 1580-1625, ed.

 

 

Mary Anne Everett Greene (London, 1872), unlike its com-
panion work contains more complete descriptions of the
contents of the documents. In some instances the documents
have been included Verbatim. Anyone using both the Lemon
and Greene editions should be cautioned that there is an
overlapping of volume numbers in these two works. Where
Lemon terminated his edition in the year 1580 with Vol.
CXLVI, Greene began hers at 1580 with.Vol. XXVII.

Many of the documents which have been given only

the briefest of descriptions in the Domestic Calendar are

 

printed in full in Tudor Economic Documents, 3 vols., ed.

 

R. H. Tawney and Eileen Power (London, 1924). The indexing
of the material under topical headings renders this work

of greater value for research in this period than the title
implies for it precludes the spending of tedious hours
classifying the materials for one's own purpose.

If the Burghley State Papers, 2 vols., ed. Samuel

 

Haynes and William Murdin (London, 1740,1759) contained

only Cecil's memorial of 1569 on the state of the realm

78
this would be sufficient reason for their use by anyone
desiring to gain an insight into the political and econ-
omic problems which were England's and therefore were of
concern to Burghley. Volume I contains documents and
letters on miscellaneous matters but their varied topics
gives one an excellent view<mfthe breadth and range of
Cecil's interests in the affairs of state. Letters and
documents relative to the Northern Rebellion and the part
played therein by Mary Stuart comprise the greater part
of the material in Volume 11.

Were one hoping to gain a picture of Cecil's work
in the Privy Council by studying the Council minutes he
would meet with great disappointment for these minutes as
set down by the various clerks and compiled in EEE.§£E§.2£

the Priyy Council, 32 vols., ed. John Roch Dasent (London,

 

1890-1907), are stilted and impersonal to the nth degree.
As Secretary, Cecil was the presiding officer and again
one marvels at the range of his interests and accomplish-
ments in serving the realm. Dasent has very conveniently
included a tabulation of attendance of each Council member
at the end of every volume. Cecil had by far the best
record here.

Whenever the members of the Tudor parliaments and
their predecessors enacted statute law they were a wonder-
fully wordy people. If the statute were designed to correct

an abuse or to improve the machinery of government a history

79

of the abuse or the malfunctioning of the government was

recited in the statute. All statutes cited in this paper

 

may be found in The Statutes 52 Large pf England and 23
Great Britain, 105 vols. (Cambridge, 1762—1865).

 

The Calendar pnganuscripts'gg the Most Honorable

 

 

 

The Marquio pf Salisbuyy, Kg., Preserved a3 Hatfield_Hpuse,

 

 

 

 

Hertfordshire, ll vols. (London, 1883—1906), has the only

vvw vv—v

 

reference to the Treaty of Bristol whiCh contains some of
its terms. Like certain other sources of original docu-
ments and manuscripts the edition of the Hatfield MSS
suffers from an editing and pruning which leaves in many
instances only a brief description of the material cited.
Other primary sources used, but of lesser value to
this essay than any of the foregoing have been the Calendar

g£_State Papers Foreigp,Serie§.of_the Reign pf Elizabeth

 

 

 

Preserved in the Public Record Office, Vol. XIX, ed. Sophie

ffi w .

 

 

Crawford Lomas (London, 1916); the Calendar 2: State Papers

 

Relating 32 English Affairs Preserved Principally'agnRome

 

 

la the Vatican Archives and Library, 2 vols., ed. J. M.
Riggs (London, 1916,1926); the Calendar pf State Papers

 

and Manuscripts Relating_£2 English Affairs Existing pp the

 

 

Archives aha Collections gngenice and Other Libraries 2;,

 

 

 

Northern Italy, Vol. VII, eds. Rawdon Brown and the Right

 

Hon. G. Cavendish Bentinck (London, 1890); the Calendar 2;

State Papers Foreign Series 23 phe Reign 2: Elizabeth 1569-

 

 

 

 

15-71 Preserved pg the State Paper Department 93 Her

 

 

8O

Majesty's Public Record Office, ed. Allan James Crosby

 

 

(London, 1874); and the Calendar 2; Spate Paper§.Foreigh

 

Series pf the Reign pf Elizabeth 1572:1574 Preserved ip

 

 

phe State Paper Department pleer Majesty's Public Record

 

 

Office, ed. Allan James Crosby (London, 1876). The value
of these sources has not been lessened by the scholarship
exhibited in their collection but only in that they have
been used primarily as sources of citations to butress
others more pertinent.

The most important secondary source for this essay

has been W. R. Cunningham's The QEQWth.2£ English Industhy

 

 

and Commerce 1p Modern Times, V01. 11: The Mercantile

 

 

 

System, 4th ed. (London, 1907). While the conclusions
presented in this essay on Cecil's commercial policy are
diametrically opposed to those expressed by Cunningham,
it was his resume of Cecil's activities in the whole field
of commerce which gave the original stimulus to the con-
ception of this essay.

Another work with which the conclusions in this essay

are at odds but which has been useful is E. Lipson's The

 

Economic History 23 England, 3 vols. (London, 1931). It
is most comforting to read in Lipson's work that because
the term "mercantilism" was not used by the sixteenth and
seventeenth century writers we should be warned against
giving "mercantilism" a formal shape and substance. But

a dash of cold water is tossed this way by Lispon as he

81
writes "nevertheless, the Mercantile System serves as a
convenient phrase to express a trend of thought" (Vol. III,
p. l) and proceeds to place Cecil in the same position as
the classical mercantilists.

Conyers Read's My. Secretary Cecil and Queen Eliza-
heph (London, 1955) is a scholarly therefore well documented
work which covers Cecil's life from his youth to the
Northern Rebellion. Read has drawn upon original sources
with few exceptions. Unfortunately he, too, gives the
mercantilist label to Cecil's activities in the commercial
sphere.

An English economic historian who did not hold with
the idea that Cecil was a mercantilist was Sir John Clapham.-

His A Concise Egonomic History p£;Britain From the Earliest

 

Times £2.A3D. 175Q_(London, 1951) is so comprehensive that

 

only a short space is devoted to refuting the allegation
that Cecil was a mercantilist.

J. W. Burgon's Life and Times 2: Sir Thomas Gresham,

 

 

2 vols. (London, 1839), does not contain any great compi-
lation of statistics on Tudor governmental finance. It
does give a very vivid picture of Elizabeth's chief finan-
cial agent in the Low Countries and Cecil's devoted friend.
Burgon made use of the Flanders Correspondence and the
Landsdowne MSS throughout his work. Much correspondence
between Cecil and Gresham is thus made available without

need for resorting to the original sources.

82

A'Mportrait" is the word used in the preface of A. L.

 

 

Rowse's The England pbelizabeth: The Structure 23 Society

 

(New Yerk, 1951) to describe this work. The style is such
that the general reader of history will enjoy it. There
is sufficient documentation to satisfy the most scholarly.

J. E. Neale's Elizabeth.l and Hep_Parliaments, 1558-

 

 

$28; (London, 1953) is a scholarly study of the acts and
activities of Parliament to 1581.

A small book which serves to whet one's appetite for
more information on the topic is Michael Lewis' A History
2: the Britiph,Nayy (Penguin Series, 1957).

 

Other books consulted and found to be of value in

 

preparing this essay were The Progresses and Public Proces-

w rvw

sions 22 Queen Elizabeth, ed. J. W. Nichols, 3 vols.

 

(London, 1823); J. B. Black's The Reign 2; Elizabeth i558-

 

 

1603 (Oxford, 1936); Conyers Read's Sir Francis Walsipgpam

 

and the 391392.22 Queen Elizabeth, Vol. I (Cambridge, 1925);

 

 

John Strype's Annals 23 the Reformation and Establishment

 

 

23.52113109Q828 Other Various Occurrences $2 the Churdh p:

 

 

 

England During Queen Elizabeth's Happy Reign, Vol. II,th.l_

 

(Oxford, 1824); William Cobbett's Cobbett's Parliamentary

 

History 23 England, Vol. I (London, 1806); James A. William-

son's The Tudor Age (London, 1953); Florence M. Grier Evans'

 

The Principal Secretary pf State: ‘5 Survey p£_the Office

 

 

From 1558 pp 1680 (London, 1923); English Economic History:

 

 

Select Documents, eds.A. E. Bland, P. A. Brown, R. H. Tawney

 

83
(London, 1921); Martin A. S. Hume's Two English Queens and
Philip (London, 1908); and A. H. Johnson's Europe pp 522
Sixteenth Century, 1494-1598 (London, 1898). Chapters VII
and VIII of the Johnson work were especially useful as they
present the political problems of Spain and the Netherlands

from the viewpoint of a scholar whose primary interest was

European history.

F5884? USE 031W