“(1| 1 l 101 128 .THS - u n A.- THE EFFEBY 0F CURING CQNBHWNS @N THE TENSILE STRENGTH 0F SUPER GEM?” MRHRS 7" warm” THESlS FOR DEGREE OF B. S. ' R.O.AVERY 5‘: I 9 2 5 S 1...... u. m I1 WW'V mm-tr‘hw 9' t?!" -r 1" WIN 3% L THESIS The Effect of Curing Conditions on the Ton-113 strength cf Super Cement Mortars. A Thesis Submiitod to the Faculty of The LICKIGAN STLIJ CULLSGE of Agricultura and Applied Science. by 3.0.Avory. Candidata for the Degree of Baoholor of Science June, 1926. ..{f' :4 I ‘5‘ u.‘ .1. . Peerle s Super Cement is made by the Peerless Portland (D Cement Co. at Uxion City, Mich.It is a discovery of an Eng- lishinvestigator and was successfully used in Great Britian a number of years before its introduction into Canada in 1920. Super Cement is merely a more efficient form of Port- land Cement and is rendered so by the incorporation of a substance known as “Catacoll” during the manufacturing Pro- cess. Catacoll itself has no more cementing value than raw gypsum ordinarily used in the manufacture of Portland Gem-— ent, a portion of which Catacoll replaces.It occupies no greater volume and is anything but a water repellant.The strength and impermeability developed in Super Cement mcr- tars are derived from the reactions which occur between the m1Xing water and the constituents of the clinker. fhe fun— ction which Catacoll accomplishes is to facilitate these reactions and thus insure that they will be more complete than in the case of Portland Cement. Super Cement hydrates more thoroughly than Portland. Cement depends upon this prOperty far its strength and den- sity. Consequently, greater strength in bond, tension and compression can be expected from Super Cement mortars. Super Cement is more efficient as a lubricant to the mix thus minimizing the tendency toward segregatin— in and- ling. As a result of this greater efficiency, Super Cement produces a concrete of sufficient density which is so im- pervious that no other means of water proofing is necessary. Exactly the same machinery is used to powder Super Cement as is used for Portland, but the Super Cement seems 93813 to be more finely ground. It has no initial set but produces a uniform set curve from cast to final set. The forgoing was taken from a bulletin published by the Peerless Cement Co. In testing for the effects on the tensile strength of mortar produced by different methods Of curing, a 1:3 mix of normal consistiency was used. The normal consistiency of neat cement was 253 and of a 1:3 mix, 15% of water by weight. The sand used was cleant sharp and dry,and passed a no. 20 sieve. The specimens were of the standard size adOpted by the Amer- ican Society of Testing Materials and were tested at the end of I,2,3,5,7,I4, and 23 days. Four briquettes were used for eacn test and the average strength of the four taaen as the final result. If a.specimen showed signs of weakness, i.e. POOTIY tamped etc. and the strength fell much below theaver- age of the others, it was discarded. Different methods of curing were obtained by varying the time that the specimens were left in dry air, moist air,and water and also by changinv the briquettes from one medium to another at different ages of the curing. The standard method adOpted by the A.S.T.M. is to place the specimens in moist air 'for the first 24 hours and the balance of the time in water. This method was varied by curing the first day in moist air and then changing to dry air the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th, 6th and 7th, 2nd week and tne last two weeks, testing the Spec- imens at the above mentioned intervals. Also specimens were cured by placing in moist airxlry air, and water for“ the fU1l 28 days. modifications were also made from these by changing to other mediums at different ages of the curing. The results obtained from the series of tests seem to be rather mystifying. It is a recognized fact that to elpose Portland cement concrete to dry air isdetrimental to the final strength of the concrete. This does not seem true for Super Cement mortars, unless the exposure to dry air is very pro- longed. Exposure to dry air not only hastens the set of the mortar but actually seems to increase the final strength at the end of the 28 day period. It was found that the mortars could be exposed to dry air for the first 5 days and the rest of the time in water and no harm done. In fact, the strength at the end of 28 days was greater than that obtained by our- ing the standard way. The highest strength, tho, was obtained by curing the standard way for the first two weeks and then exposing to dry air the last two weeks. Curing the full 28 days in dry air gave practically no strength at all. the mortar almost crumbling at the touch. cured The final strength of thosefithe full 28 days in water was almost as much as those cured the standard way,but the set for the first few days was greatly retarded. Also, great care had to be exercised when placing the specimens in water or much of the mortar would wash away. The conclusions arrived at thru the series of tests ind- icate that to get the strongest concrete, cure the standard way,i.e. keep the concrete as wet as possible for the first two weeks and then expose to dry air after that.Also great care must be exercised when placing Super Cement concrete under water or much of the fine mortar will wash out and the strength of the concrete will be greatly reduced. The following is a table of the actual strengths as tested. The letters under the ages at which the specimens were tested denote how the Specimen was cured from the precceding testing day to the one at which the test was made.For example,D under the second day means that the Specinen was cured in dry air for the second day, or D under the 3rd day means that the Specimen was cured in dry air the third day or from the 2nd testing period to the 3rd testing period etc. Legend: 3- dry air. M- moist air. 3- water. The numbers under the letters give the average strengths in pounds per square inch as tested. Table of tested strengths. Age of specimen (days) -~---“-.----—‘-—--‘-”~.*0.“~’~~-‘—.--.—.-----‘-—.-v-_-—-—--._-‘ I 2 3 5 7 I4 28 M iv ll, IJ v I 1u I VJ - 60 90 I40 210 240 260 In D ‘I W .) VJ J d J - 60 I45 185 200 220 260 h N D J 'J W J - 6O IBC I85 200 250 295 i; 2': 5 w n u; v w A 55 95 225 230 250 290 K W W W D ’H ‘H - 60 85 I50 220 255 275 IS ?7 if if 3? I) ll - 60 90 I45 20 245 500 It: I"; W Y; W w D - 65 IOO I50 215 250 400 D D D D D D D 50 100 12 I30 150 IIO 80 m i 1 to 4-, L .1 tJ‘.‘;fi, . fable 0; be tel tti--_tns v ’ continued. in Age of specimens (days) I 2 3 5 7 14 28 .1 Id Id 1; hi If it - so so 150 160 ITS 195 P-I r \ D—vi " . r a H C: F a b—v 1 * p—a P—fl ‘ 7. ‘ ‘,'“ 1 iv; (A LA ‘0‘ I‘ al TO“ \r‘ (‘ r \ - - a. — " {J ‘Jv‘J Hub . ‘0 1‘" 3-7 —. , -, J 1‘. 1' C II ‘5 1' 44. "T H. .. ,V, .n- s. .d .1 .3 II ill! I»: ’5: Li D D D D , e K H D D D D D g «r ”I ~- ‘1 er v- '0’ it. m at in m — — 4O 7O 80 I75 210 tested strenvths continued. u ’ :3a of specimens (days —--a— ------—I—_u-~.— -~--=- --.—- .- --o-- - U" .— -‘P‘ F- —---'—.-o—'- ‘—-y -- “m“. _. I 2 3 5 7 I4 2 5:! k -. Pd 1 D" L: L: I»; A... In: M; 80 80 I50 I80 I75 I35 In: In: I"; II: A HA he. J - - — ~ - 155 ‘ . ,_ _. ~r .,_, Ala; 1?. in Au. . i ll - ~ “ ~ I60 I70 I... A». in .1 .I II; - — - ISO sec 220 V . 3 J V H - - 110 120 Inc 200 M N U N J - CO 90 I30 I90 2I0 ' r 1. .t 1 - 1n . x . “.7 in iv. Ah- ) t“) t E". I F I U l U I C) l H C") U CO U U“ l I l I H M D D D D D _ .. _ __ _ gr: v p —r r - 40 65 65 I40 I90 EV LI 1.1 Li I»: 1.1 - - 70 80 I75 2I0 3 .1 r FfiNi tel. b 1.. Mllwlilliu Hul...v|u...u.lllfl x. .. nevus «xx “antitank“ \o «Ax RR R $\ R\ Q Q‘N 1.11.1.1! m: ssh es. (28 h.\\ . Q it. 2.3th u S a. i .- besbq ks $13. \\a\ u \8 M83. \xuxt \‘x. w n W e2 «$.95 “N “Sits t\\ nwkfihkesh b\\n§wN h\x\\\§\§§b ,Ul/s 7/ .thx‘ xxx ntfikxxuuuwwkb bh‘ \\ ex ex Rx m. . w 3.2.. Max—t. .5 event‘s samn \h.‘ \a\\ nether: 33* thmx Mia \K§\§§\H\\VL\~U h§\&\\uhx. \\ ‘\\§\L\.W MNxh-«WK \\\ c‘fl QQM fig - {II/9 7/ n\\\ V\ otutAxuh\n.\Q uh? ‘N‘ \N \N \x 8. a... \ 6*»?! S3. \an tithe! msx \k‘ “$3.43 98x 3?? M8} \\v\k§\:n \\\\u n ‘whsxuuxnxs VX8333. “Knew sex es». QQM sfiw . ,W/Fy/ is.“ NW“ max “MTV n. 99 uh I “I M .N: t. 7 I t. Z W t ,w. 3 i J 0 .r P, I. ma v: v: .r b .M W a, y: 3x can 8‘. ..\Q_\.\W\h‘\ \\ “\V\ \K‘Lxecv“ \\ $2.. \VX‘ wxxttMsVK ”shes. x~\ \Qxbhxh R.“ \\§\§\\h ; .w/s-yx V3“ \\\§u «an... $xNN\h\\ $3 \sxhkxm. bxxnssWR hxxtxsthfixkstb we": - MIC |IHIGA|N STATE UNIVERSITY LIB I... III will lllllllHllIles O75 llHllj