Au-“.-A.A ‘— inr ' PLOCKHOY AND HIS WRITINGS: THE STUDY OF A SOCIAL REFORMER Thesis Ior tho Degree of M. A. MICHIGAN STATE COLLEGE Leland David Harder I950 PLOGKHOY AND HIS WRITINGS: THE STUDY OF A. SOCIAL IEFORL‘LFB by Leland mvid Ihrder A THESIS Submitted to the School of fieduate Studies of Michigan State college of Agriculture and. Applied Science in partial fulfillment of the requirement. for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Department of Sociology and Anthropology 1950 fl’HESIS TABLE OF CONTENTS 0mm TAGS I. INTROWCTIONTOTHESTUDY .1............... 1 II. RATIONALISTIG—MYSTICAL MOVELEfiI-T'I‘S IN TIE IETIKHILANDS . . . 9 TheMennonites......................12 ThBGOIIegiante..................... 15 TheRefornateure....................‘. 18 III. REFORM IN ENGLAND DURING THE INTEIRREGNULI . o . . . . . . . 22 IV. SETTLE’ENT IN NEW BETEERIAND IN ALIERIGI . . . . . . . . . 40 V. HOMEOY'SREFORMSCIELESANDIDEAS ........... 61 ‘ConcerningManandSooiety............... 6]. concerning Teachere and heaohere . . . . g . . . . . . 68 Concerning Governors and Government . . . . . . . . . . 74 For the Establishment of a Universal Chrietendom . . . . 78 For the Establishment of the Ideal Community . . . . . . 83 Divisionoflabor.................. 83 Frinciplee and Techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 VI. cmcmmonorranxms.'................101 VII. RETROSPECTAND WNOLUSION . . . . e . . . . . . . . . . . 110 BIBLIOGRAPHY .........................130 APPENDIXA: AUTIDRSHIP OF THE WWIRFAEL . . . . .g . . . . . . 134 APPENDIX B: CONTRACT BETWEEN PLOCKEY AND THE AMSTERDAM BURGOLIASTERS...................140 APPEDIDIX O: SONNBT BY KAREL VERLOOVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142 APPENDIX D: "swarmo VERSES" BY JACOB swammm . . . . . . . . 14:5 LIST OF FIGURES magma PAGE 1. Title-page of the Later Edition or Plockhoy'e, mmmmmmb filament embed: Natige................... 26 2. Title-page of the later Mition of Plockhoy'e, 5. Ear. homundgd, and the Title-page of the 'fInvitetion'f appended thereto . . . . . . . . 29 3. Title-page or‘the 39;; verge; leg 111933 Hederlantleee‘eeeeeeeeeeeeeee 51 4. Title-page of Plockhoy'e, Maggy; Ontwerp 53 5. Bronle Memrial rebiet'neoed in the Town an of Zierikzee by William mnot Griffin ii: the Name of the Netherlands Society of Philadelphia 105 diapter I INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY nae account of the life, ideas, andvritinge of Pieter Gor- nelis noekhoy (16807-17001) has never been told in ite entirety. Katy of the facts here assenbled have heretofore been uniniovn. Hie life encompasses activities in three countries of the 17th century—the Betta-lands, England, and Amrica. In the Nether- lands he one in several my. a typical product ofthe 'fGolden Age'f in which he lived. In other ways he was so dietinot tint soholars have doubted the authenticity of his nntoh background. In Duritan mgland his ideas found the greatest fruition and expression. He Ins compelled, however, to leave England after the Reetoi-etion of Gnrlee n in 1660. me untiring hope to realise the best possible commity culminated in the establish- ment of a small hitch settlement on the Delaware in Nev Nether- land in 1663. The colony, which he dreamed would era and develop into the ideal commonalth of love and equality, Ins destroyed scarcely a year later in the war for eupremcy in the III Iorld betseui Holland end Englanl. An active career of reform-poli- tical, social, and religioue--seemingly came to an abrupt end in the sparsely populated Dutch province, autocratioally administered and interested chiefly in the profit motive. Such a society lad little interest in utopianl who nought the extinction of dicta- torial rule, slavery, an! the ills of an ultra-capitalistic system. 2 flirty years late noekhoy, with his wife, appealed to the ear- ly settlers at Germantown, Pennsylvania, for aid. ihe reformer was old, penniless, and blind. 'fi painful reflectionfl wrote Eduard Bernstein, Germn socialist, “that so gifted a men should 1 - fare so poorly.'f it ie largely to niropeen scholars that we owe the histori- cal account of Ploclohoy's endeavors in Holland and hgland. they established hie authorship of two neglieh writings pnbliehed in London in 1659 and signed simply mm. Several possible authors were considered including one nigh More, who had written in a similar vein,3 and another Abraham inn meren, who had falsely claimed tb distinctions But when the colonization pospeutus which nothoy published in Anterdam mile the title, m an m m (Brief end concise plan), was discovered, the proJect described was found to be identieel with that embodied in the second mglish writing, ,A_ LY. W 3.9. kn m M mmmmmmfl” .Plockhoy, it was further r V 1 M Bernstein. menmmm- _ (Stuttgart, 1922), p. 290. Bernsteinwas mam father of the Bevieioniet movement in Germny at the turn of the century. His work contains a chapter on Plockhoy (hpter I). 8 1113., p. 27421. hters' authorship of Am Was suggested by George Thomson, 17th century book collector, who wrote: 'fl believe this pamphlet was undo by Mr. Hugh Peeters, who hath a mu named carnelius Glover."_ See, 221198119. 91 31;; 29.9151. W. mwwht 3mm 1 We . 3.24. W 122. 1' e w, II. (Iondon: The British nieeum, 1908), pp. 235-6. :53. r. G. Quack, Mum (Amsterdam: Van Kampen a icon, 1898, pp.,240-2. Quack, the principal authority on hock- hoy in Holland, states that a hitch publication of 1688 under the name of Lmren was |'i'rom the beginning to the end” a plagiarised translation or l'lockhcy's, 5mm See map”! Vle ‘ - q . w o | - e e e - - . . , I v e o e - e discovered, had petitioned Oliver Cromwell, Lord Protector of England during the Interregnnm, to sponsor another of his reform schemes, which sought to establish Christendom as a universal state under a single magistracy. It was piblished under the title, 13..” 31 1h; Mali Settlement gm Natigg w W... 110ch had signed the English writings, "Tbter Oormlius'f sincehthe Dutch were accustomed to use the patronvmic after theIQn'istian name with entire omission of the surname} The presence of Flockhoy in colonial Arteries. has been treated by few Amer loan historians.5 This is especially unfortunate since his writings include a fourth, comprising 117 articles of asso- ciation and government for his settlement, which were anonymously published as part of the 3.013. Wm mm mm... (Brief Account of Nee Netherlands). The articles, which John Bomeyn Brodhead placed 'famong the most extraordinary of the early memorials of American colonimtiotuff6 define a system of popular government. Brodhead ind, in fact,‘discovered the document in Holland as he was searching for all extant materials relative to the history of colonial New York. He and Edmund Burke O'Oallaghan, v‘fi V w—v ‘ J. hanklin Jmaons Gave WQLMW. 1.9.9.6 " 1592. (Nation. 1909). met. nookhoy had, incidentally, clanged his name on a later edition to fitter Oormlis-son.ff 5 ma Ghanning included a brief statement of l'lockhoy‘s utopian ideas in hi! 'Ome' A. Mr: 91. IBM We 11. IN“ York: The Macmillan Company, 1908), p. 412. 5 :. noneyn redhead. mam'mum lone (r... You: Afirper & Brothers, 1874), p. 698. For identification of the author ship, see Appendix A. 4 who translated most of these records, were the first to ascribe authorship of the articles to no ckhoy. Interest in the reformer has been revived in several recent studies. In England Iilhelm Schenk attempted to place 210ch in his proper perspective in the history of Btgland during the Interreemm- 31' Work. £129. 312993.11 £01 £95.21. Emu-9.6. in 12. MW (Iondon. Lemmas. Green endow, 1948) con- tains a sympathetic account.‘ In Lnnrioa the most recent histori- cal work to include an account of Plockhoy's Amrican settlement, however cursory, is Ellis Iewrence'meely'e, m 9; En. lgtherhfl (New York, colnnbie University’rreee, 1945). Mona-- graphs by Irvin first? and Leland mrder8 have published more recently discovered eater ials. Bernstein points out that Ilochhoy'e reform was primarily social, tint his religious arguments were secondary.9 Plockhoy wrote, in fact, tint religion in practice was an activity "with which the society in gencal is not concerned. {10 Several socio- logical writers Lave been interested in the sociological nature 11 of nockhoy’s ideas. lbns knew, however, from whence the ideas A 7 Irvin first, 'fheter dormliee nockhoyt An Apostle of the mile- giants,'f W W m nun. (July 1949) pp. 161-86. 8 Ieland firder, 'fl’lockhoy‘ ani his Settlement at manendael, 1663,” _W m III. (March 1949) pp. 138.55. ,_ Reprinted in . Emails. W11 liaise. XXIII. . (July 1949) pm 186-99- 9 Eduard Bernstein, 93,911., p. 215. 10 Suzi an user. 5mm (no pagination)- 11 Notably. Hue-t Trash-ch. manual 12512125 21mm Mah- (Iondon, 1931), II, p. 712, pp. 975-6; and Berry 1!. IMillet. WW (New York: mom- I. Q'owell 00., 1945), p. 4.211. came. This study embodies We related although distinct types of sociological endeavour. It is a study in the field of social thought an! attenpts to give an historical interpretation of the ideas of a representative social thinker. It is also a study of social idealism, of the relation betwoen ideals and social progress. Behind the utopian dream is the belief that society is mpable of improvment and can be reformed in accordance with a rational ideal. Plockhoy was first and foremost a social reform- er. 1 social reformer is an individual who has a conception of social improvement embodied in definite agencies of social change and who attempts to subject these agencies to imediate practical utility. The mterials concerning I'lockhoy pertain in most part either to his socialistic writings orfito local history in Delaware. Part of the mrit tint can be hoped from this study lies in the fact that it is the first, to the writer's knowledge, which attonpts to give a definitive treatment of ..5. integrated nature which con- siders not only his writings and ideas but also his colonisation work in English and American history. I'he mterials for this study were athered in several ways. kinetically none of the secondary sources used were available in local libraries. Some were found in the historin libraries of Goshen College (Goshen, Indian} and Bethel college (North Kewton, Xanadu—Mennonite institutions. Others were borrowed from larger libraries on an 6 inter-library loan. In several cases microfilm of the pertin- ent pages of a work was obtained. Numerous letters requesting information pertaining to sources of material were sent to libraries, historiml societies, and individuals, in five differ- ent calntries.12 In this way only was it possible to gather specific data and lomte original editions of the writings, which were chained on'photostat or microfilm. his study is arranged in twa parts. chapters II—IV contain a biographical prevue and reveal the historical origin of most of the ideas of nockhoy. Chapte- 11 defines the ratiomlistic- pietis tic movements with which he was conmcted in his zative Netha'lands. hpter III concerns him in Mgland where he pub- lished his schemes for the establishment of a universal eristen- dem and the little comnities designed for the relief of the economically oppressed peoples. Attemptis made to relate the ideas inherent in his social reform program to similar notions among the hritan reformers. (Ilapter IV describes the organis- tion, negotiaticns, and planting of nockhcy's settlement on the blame in New seine-land. Altman the plan was similar in the primary respects to the previous scheme, there are several inno- vations, the origin of which are easily discernible as protests to the politiul clnracter of the Dutch mticsi or as changes necessitated by a New Iorld environment. Emphasised are the ideas of popular govscnnent all. tie exclusion of slavery in the settle- mast. 13 United States, Great Britain, at Heterlands, Belgium, and Germany. Chapters V-VII are concerned with the ideas. Chapter V contains an examination of the basic not ions in Plockhoy's social schemes--his ideas concerning man and society, teachers and prea- chers, govermrs and government, the establishment of a universal Christendom, and. the organisation of the ideal community. The ideas as set down in the writings have been paraphrased in some instances and quoted verbatim in others. Chapter VI discusses the circulation of the ideas among two contemporaries who were influenced by nockhoy, and several recent writers, primarily socialists, who rave admired the reformer. In retrospect an! conclusion, Clapter VII is intapretive. {the ideas are examined in the light of the social and religious develOpments of the age in an attempt to reveal those which stem from these develop- ments and those which are distinctly original, and in the light of social advancements which lave been made since that age. This Chapter must conclude with a statement concerning the edition of the writings which have been used for the study. m 13151 3331 32.9.9.9. ES. Sgtflanentpf these Nation! is the edition "printed for Daniel White,” which included, as other editions did ' f 13 ‘ not, a letter to Riclnrd Cromwell. A 1731 W is taken fmm the edition signed 'fieter 0ornelis-son,'f and ”pr inted for 13 The mniel white edition is in the British Museum. Original copies of the edition without the letter to Riclnrd Q'omvell and the printer's name are found in the libraries of the University of Gent and the Historical Society of Pennsylvania. It 1- raprinted in as W W dim. VI. edited by Walter Scott. (lemon, 1811.), pp. 497-97. 8 14 the Authorflf sum was a later edition since it contains seven subscribersat the end of the writing, while other editions, which were "printed for G. G.,'f (Giles Calvert) have only two or four subscribers. The Dutch prospectus, which appeared in only one edition,15 and the seven letters submitted for Plockhoy to the Amster dam magistrates16 have been used in translated form. 14 This edition is in the Library of the University of Amsterdam. The Giles (Elvert edition, having four subscribers to Plockhoy's project, is in the British Museum. It is reprinted with several omissions in a monograph by John Downie, £912; grgliug 2199333: fin Ligg 3.123. Work. (finchester: Ooopera- tive hinting Society, 1933). Domie, quoting from Bernstein, uses the name "Flockboy'f imtead of "FlockhoyJ' The sevm'al editions, minus the "Invitation," are found in the New York Public Library. - 15 It is found in the Royal Library at the Hague, the library of the University of Gent, the Royal Library at Gravenhage, and the Henry E. Huntington Library at San Merino, 0511!. A translation of the writing was trade by 8. W. Pennypacker, 3219. Bastian} 91W (miladelphia, 1899),, pp. 198-206. 16 ‘h'anslation was made from the original copy of the gilt—EM 33 Kim Nedgrlapp. in the library of the New York Historical Society, perinps the only copy still extant. Chapter 11 mnommxc-msrmu names m m mums The fee existent contanporary references to the activities of Pieter Coulis nocthoy in the hetherlands reveal (1) that he sees tron neriksee,’ com-rem center in Iceland, (2) that he associa- ted with hlenns Abs-shame de Haan, physician and the leading mini- ster more he hemcnites at Amsterdam, (3) tint his most important somectien was with the Collegiant movement, the essence or which as freedom in religion, speech, and thought, and (4) that he 1nd frieuie among a group or poets who gathered in the 'fheet But: an inn inmterdam, andwhc came to be mosses them, Ibis cbpter will attempt to reconstruct these activities and place that in the perspective or the age in which 310ch lived and or which he was a product. H After a precarious forty-year period or revolution in the latter 131! of the 16th century the people of the Low Countries at last succeeded in throwing off the yoke or specimen-cm. Ll- bert,’ the archduke of Austria, into whose lands the letherlaue had passed, hastened to conclude a truce with the rebellious northern states. E agreed to deal with them as he ‘fwould deal with a free independent state.'f1 he provinces of Holland and beland soon be- came the principaheentere of commerce and industry in Europe. 1 W‘- Home, mummm. (30" York! '0! lubliehers, 1945), p. 162. ror refereme to nocthoy, see p. 187 10 And although the revolution Ind nilcd to substitute complete re- ligious tolerance for a state-church, or democraq for oligarchy,‘ the new period in the evolution of the Dutch mtion, correctly called the 'fGolden Age of Hellsnd,"'_ brought a greater degree of individual freedom thn me ever been known before. the period was Mcterised in part by its cultural cemopolitani-s. Dur- ing the brief six years of Plockhoy's energetic reform activities (1680-1664). '2th and'Vermeer'were painting their canvases; Vandal was'wri‘ting his drama; Bpinosa had Joined the Collegian" and Descartes Ind cone to Amsterdam'fz his» leading lights of culture were, into nocrhoy, dissenters of a conventioml mode and the established worm mm or Holland. Ileclhoy's original home is known from records which contain his lane, to which usually was appended "van wit-Iced: His writings were signed in this mnner,‘ aui‘the colonisation contract whifi he obhined from the Amsterdam bnrgonnsters included the seas inscription. the facts tint his American settlement was com- posed, in large part at least, of lemonitee, tint he was affilia- ted with the Mennonite Church of Amsterdam, and tint he sought aid in his firm]. days in a llennonite village in colonial lennsylvania,‘ has led scholsre to surmise that his family and mutt-smug were lihevise hemonite. m the basis of this conclusion one can see 2 Irvin Horst, "lieter Oomliss nccfiioy: in Apostle of the Gelle- cunts.“ WWW... XXIII (July 1949). p- 178. 3 as date of his birth is unknown. it might be estinted between 1620 and 1625. 11 tint his anti-sectarian ideas might have developed in an early association with the mill group of Mennonites in zicriksee, who lad previously refused to become partisan to am one of the sev- eral factions among the Dutch nennoniteeuthe hisians,‘ ncmish, and Iatcrlanders. The Mennonites of lieritsee had been banned as 'fetill-standers'f for their stubborn policy of neutrality. It ns‘doubtless hers‘thst nocrhcy first new Galenus Abrahams de scan, for Calculus was born here in idea and his father was the minietc of the Mennonite march of Zieriksee. nockhoy and the young do man were of about the same age, both became imbued with the Collegiant philosoplw, and were at Amsterdam together. It is thus not unlikely tint they were friends in their youth and derived nut-.1 ideas in a sermon Mennonite environaent. Hie pro- bability of nocrhoy's Mennonite bscigrcund is further substantiated by the rutch'nsnuouite historian, de hoop schsrrsr. who investi- gstsd the early church records sud found that the name, nockhoy, was cannon among the Mennonites of that day.‘' then dalenus became a minister in the nemish nennonite church in Anstcdsm in 1648, Plochhoy also was there. this period, 1550- 1664., was s critissi one in the history of that church and of the 43. r. G. hack, an- (Amsterdam, Yanhmpend: Icon, 1892), p. 215n. In his letterto Quack, do Hoop Scheffer writes: "If you wish to can your friend nockhoy a Mennonite you can do that. It appears to me from official records that his ancestors all belonged to tint denomination. Jacusmijntie hetero, wida of I. R. Plockhoy, became a member in our church here on 5 November 1662, with a church letter from Middelburg; her son Wrnelis P. was baptised here on confession of faith on 23 hbrmry 1670....Iith the carelessness existing in the 17th century the name is written in the Registers one time 'rluckhoy, ' then again 'Mckhoy,‘ and sometimes 'Eloquoy' or'nucuore "‘ 12 whole Mennonite mowemuit in the Betherlands. ihe period was one or internsi eentiiet,‘ end ended in 1554 with the division of the church into two bodies. Among the charges tint had been hurled easiest the liberal menus was thst his church had differing factions; one or which was the W. niece factions, the account asserted, fright like in a mdianite battledf the accu- sation continued that 'fheter nocthcy, Galenus' countrymnflf went so far with his radical ideas as to sdvooete the practice or poly-gain, "proclaiming with Scriptml authority fiat a nun may have as many wives as he can support)5 no parties within the Antwan church were Gellegiant groups. blends had introduced collegianiln and became one or its principal leaders. Ehe con- flict which Oollsgianism brought to a crisis sas between the cen- serutives who believed tint the airistian life should be regu- lated by rules of conduct and prescribed confessions or faith,“ and the progressives who minimised the importance of creeds or a strict applinticn of disciplinary rules and who emphasised instead a spiritml lire guided by an enliditcned conscience. blows and money were included among the latter group. 1e rm woman he Mennonite movement originted as the Anabaptist wing of 5 W: WWW 1668. An arisi- ' -ml cepy or this tract is in the Bethel College Historical Litury. Ehe collegiant parties listed were Elmelisten,-Knyperisten, donnisten, Boreelisten, and nocrhoyisten. i'he pamphlet was anomalously written and was one or several of its kind in the Iamerenkrijsh (war among the lambs). his charge against Flock- boy will be discussed below. 13 the hinglian rerorntion in lwitserlend in 1525. no movement was an attempt to restore Giristianity once mre to a basis of indivi- d'ul responsibility and to reproduce as literally as possible the primitive Apostolic diurch in its origiml purity and simplicity. he Bible was their sole source or spiritual authority and the sermn on the hunt interpreted their social and religious pro- gram. Adult baptism alone was accepted as binding. Belief in non-resistance was basic in accordance with wrist 's injunction to 'fLove thine emiss,"f and flcsist not «11.7 wsr they remed to sanction and military service they rejecteias undiristian. Ilen- bers were to obey the governnent,‘ but to have no active part in the government. aaths were not to be taken. The simple life as prescribed and members were to dress plainly. his was prompted by the Scriptural injunction to be fin the world, but not or the worlde‘f , \ rho movement developed rapidly in the letharlands inspitc or - a half-century of extreme persecution under the Spanish overlords.‘ Iilliem of Grange, revolutionist leader, opposed‘the persecution of“ the Anabaptist-flenuonites; but the policy of religious toler- ance which he attanpted to inaugurate failed when the filvinists won a privileged place in the New Republic an! demanded the sup- Fenian of all non-Mvinist public worship. httmtely the tunporal authorities. often disregarded this demnd. lhny of the 6 It is estinted tint 1,500 hitch lhnnenites met a martyrs death during the Spanish regime. e Bee, 0. Hem-y hith, mm g1 321W. (Barns, hidianai Mennonite Book concern, 1941, 14 Kennonites were people of wealth during a time when capitalistic uterprise was loomed upon with favor. his and the fact that pse— sens of prestige 1nd Joined tin Mennonites assured them a more secure place in the cities as well as in rin'al districts. By 1660 the validity of a llennonite baptism as a airistian sacrament was accepted by the m of the hitch Reformed (lurch. i'he ruling inns in amwer to a controvery which had arisen in New “storm as to whether a certain Mennonite, baptised in the Mennonite church of Amsterdam could be admitted to the Lord's Supper in the Be- romsd church without rebaptism. ihe m ruled that 'fsihee he has been baptised. once, he need not again be baptised. such is indeed the practice of the churches in this country. Holy Baptism is not administered snow to such as have been previously baptised by Epists or Mennonites. Such are admitted to the Lord's flapper on confession of their faififlf? “ I created some degree of liberty in religious matters the lav-a1 groups of Hensonites attauptcd to compromise their differences in doctrines end practises and to unite. nae Istericnders, coming from the southern end of Holland, were the most liberal in their vicws. hey had discarded most forms of externl discipline and r1814 recall-luau of behavior. he nemish, who had moved into the northerly province of hiesland, were different in language and cultml traits than the hisians among whom they settled; am the hisians did not fellowship with that. Both, however, were somewhat 7 wmmmmincium 1. Compiled by 3. To “Mn. “In“, 1901-1916 ' pps 6134a 15 more conservative tun the Interlanders. file attempt at unifi- cation succeeded in pcrt‘but was ultimately thwarted when some of the liberal minded groups Joined the ocusgicnt movement, which was sleeping through the Rather-lands at this time. He 1‘33 communism he Dollegiants were not an cruised religious sect. but as urban of various denominations simply met together to discuss the common inith. they believed these meetings were superior to other forms of worship. hey were anti-Oalvinist, advomted the separation of church and state, and accepted no set creed. Eis- torioally the movement has been traced back to 1519 and the homom- strant movement.8 the Buonstrants,‘ or erinians, opposed the in- position of the Reformed religion upon the people; and in 1619 their ministers were driven from their pulpits. Osrhin leaders, however, devised a my of holding the members of the preacher-less churches together. They simply not without a preacher, read the Scriptures to each other, and spoke and consumed as the 'fapirit'f moved. they soon found they could do very well without preachers. may turned any from church organintion, a professioml ministry, and the idea of imperative doctrinal beliefs. leople of all reli- gious groups were irrited to attend the meetings provided they accepted the Bible as divine authority for all behavior, which was the only reeuirahmt of the members. then the Remonstrants were G M1 ll- “le LWQ‘W: Wanna W. (midget hrvard University h'ess, 1947), p. 563. 16 alle'ed to resins their religions services they new groups remained apart. inlay rented a building at Bynsburg for their gatherings, which they ulled m. hey became known both as hasburgers and Gaussiants. Iilhur sunrises their activities and beliefs: ‘be procedure at the meetings was simple. home passages of Scripture were read, a prayer was offered, and one or more made an edifying address. in invi- tation was then given for anyone that felt so moved to speak. Sud: addresses sometimes lasted an hour, and in use of several in succession the meeting mld run far into the night. In this way they aimed to revive the practice of the first all-istian churches....'me manhoo- ship of the collegiants was composed of some from the Monstrants, a few from the Reformed and many that were not committed to any confession; but by far the largest number came from the liennonites. It was never thought necessary for one to leave another church to Join them, and even some of the ministers of churches attended their gatherings. heir meetings were usually held on holiday, but there were often week-day meetings as well. .. hptism (by immersion) as practiced as a valued sign of adherence to mristianity, but was not insisted on; and the Lord's Supper was observed as a token of Cristian fellowship, to which any were ad- mitted who acknowledged in any sense that Jesus was the Grist, the Son of the living God. the acriptures were their only rule of faith; no creed or confession was set up as a test of membership in their company or of participation in their matings. file controlling principles of the Mme that the utmost freedom of speech was allowed to all participants (though women, on Scriptural grounds, were not pennitted to talus part), and that in the free fraterml discussion that followed the lei-gas; unit-ml tolerance of divergent views was practiced. lhe dollegiants believed that divine truth is to be confirmed by special signs. and miracles, as was the ease of the New hetment. Galena emphasised this point as did ncckhoy. In addition to their insistence on religious freedom the dollegiants had a concern for 9 m, pp. 564-5. 17 social Justice as well. he 'fOranJe-Lppel‘f home in Amterdam was a Joint dollegiant-llennonite home for orphans, a continuity center, and a house of mercy. is stated above, Galenus Abraham de Ban beanie one of the min advocates of dollcgianism in Amsterdam. than he became a minister of the Hennonite church in that city the elders were aupieione of him from the beginning and accused him of being a locinian.“ hey questioned him on several occasions concerning his advoucy of freedom in religious uatters, and he defended his vial by referring to origiml Lnbaptin, which had for one of its primary tenets the right of the individual to interpret the Bible for himself and to obey his own conscience in matters of re- ligious faith. blame regarded himself as salient of a prophet, a herald of a new light in the spiritualiaing of the-times. ale conflict, however, continued, and in 1664 resulted in the division of the diureh, mentioned above. nose who remained with blame were the Ismists, who centimed to uphold Gillegiant vdiws. lheir adrersaries, numbering about 700, withdrew and set up meetings in ahuildingwith the sign cfthe sun, andwere thus knownas the Zonists. be 33'. mm the, marketed most of the lunonitu in the lethclands. Everywhere the 'fbattle-cry'f of the progressives was ”recliner speech, absolute tolerance, and} universal eristcn- dcmeen It is with this philosophy and background that ncckhoy can A 10 he prim: tenet of flocinianism was anti-trinitarianism, which was the only doctrine it held consistently during the entire history of the movement. Sec, Iilhur, 91,311., p. 4. 11 Wm 11. ‘sdited by Christian nose and christ- _ian leff. (ll-entrant am lain, 1913), p. :7. 18 be observed as a refomer in mgland and coloniser in America, enieavcring to establish the universal church along Collegiant lines, and the ideal Qiristian conunonwealth of love, equality, and freedom. 111. IE! RENEW hactially all the information about Piochhoy as a Gilleg ant concerns charges brought against him for advocating the practice of polymer. he charge is repeated by Iambertus hidlco, the collegiants' most bitter antagonist.12 nccrhoy's interest in the implicetione of polygamy as practised in'eld rectum-it days :onn further messiah among a coup of poets, who athered in the in of one Jan lost (pronounced 'lseet").13 Here a group of "lovers of the noble art of poetry” asssubled in meeting, similar to a 14 m. hey called their society the m on m 1. In hie in," the 'fflwcet sect} Zoet eetehliehed an firt-echool for the promotion of tirtue. '35 he participants included a Mennonite, net. liztel, Hendrik Bruno, hrtholomeus Abba, larel Vsrloove, and Jacob ltesndan. be last two mmed wrote poems for nockhcy's coloninticn prospectus in 1662, which expressed a great deal of 12 Lambertus hidloo. mwmwm ~W (Amsterdam, 1701 . 13 Ilochhoy's connection with “IOIOIPOO‘BI was first discovered and ,studied by c. h. Hylkena, a Dutch Mennonite historian. Bee, ..sformsisnrs. manhole; mgr 912.11 is. Wise WA “Wmmm- (M10138 Willis: 6: Icon, 1902 , pp. 100-6. 14 6mm rem. W We. 1'. (Greningen: J. B. Walters, 1909b Do 463. i'he" refers to the bay on which Amsterdam is situated. . . 15M. 19 16 sympathy toward Plookhoy and his reform program. All of these posts, in fact, hoped to improve the morale of Amsterdam by fthe abolition and reform of various customs, here as elsewhere all too 17 deeply rooted.'f ind filus they became known as the W. zoet, the "head-poet,“ introduced 'maningful and soul-searching 318 7 .' question”? to which the others wrote answers in verse. he question whether 'fthe Bible or wrist ianity allows or forbids 19 . Dome? came up for discussion more than once, and the affir- mtive position was taken by lost, who it was hinted did not get along too well with his wife. (in epitaph described him as "cry- ing by the fire over the grumbling of his wife”):0 When the question was phrased, "When a nan by marriage is bound to a woman, may he sleep with his maid-servant without transgression”, '11 the ensuing discussion reverted to a bitter exchange of words, lteendam ———rfi ‘w 16 Verloove was one of the youngest and perhaps the most religious of the poets. His main work was a collection of stories from the Bible which he set to rhythm and rhyme: W cm“, 9.1.1113: Jam in W on Wm alien (un- largement of the Elly Hymns in 200 songs set to psalm melodies), (Amsterdam, 1686). Hie poetic motto was "nu: speelt siJn rol" (each plays his role). Btecndam has come to be known as the .' "first poet of New Nethcland." He had spent some time in the Dutch havince in America and was exceedingly interested in its development. His poetic motto as "noch vaster" (still firm). Steendam means literally ”stone dam," and the noch vastcr was a play upon his own name. Sec, IV. Edited by P. 6. lblhuysen and 1r. 1. H. Kossmann. (Leiden, 1911), col. 1380. l? Ialff, 9mm. p. tea. 18 MWWW L col. “77-8- 19 relir, mt," p. 4.63. h ' ‘ so in 3.311, M :1 .Tan Klaau. wwmmmm .W. (Hoorn, 1675), p. 878. 20 leading in the attack against Zoet. Zoet attempted to clear him- self by agreeing with Verloowe tint 'st who lives in indecency is sinner in freedomflf88 and by stating that m mm W m m. In‘a play on uocthcy's name, lost wrote a laurel poem in which he stated: although lhave printed this question on paper above, it is not. M noun aw my, stack; but it was written with a Zeelander's pen with a lewd desire to serve the world as if blind.'fas 2. this Bteendam answered: fYou have pressed this question before quite differently, m it with a fast hand from leuhels' m in defense of his quick-tempered Fission, though by a bastard-hound» you say it was blindly writtenflz‘ lost, incited to anger, wrote a defense of the 'fhonor and glory of the forefathere'f who had in. Old l’estament bye paid homage to palm. his timetateendam answered by including Iister 31ch with David Joris, Jan van leyden, Knipperdolling, hechting, and Jan Hathys, among the perm-.1... of 1,0in and imbued with the 'fspirit of error-..‘fz5 Such us the nature of the discussions of polygamy in the fdweet neet'f and the relation of Iicckhey thereto. The fact that ' his writirge contain no hint that “he wished to incorporate the practise of polyganw in his own colezw (the tendency was on the con- 8: mm. 23 mm. 24 my... 1». m. 25 m1“ p. 381. fhose listed with nockhoy as the patriarchs of polyganw were fanatical Anabaptists who held loose social views and brought the movement into ill repute. three of them had been involved in the mnster uprising in Iestphalia in the early history of Ambaptisn. 21 trary toward an ascetic way of life) indicates, as first states, that flatly such ideas were only raised for discussion and later seised upon by the enemies of the [0011081313] movementflf“ other ideas of Jan that an! the hrnasuane, however, are found in nothoy's writings and are worthy of mention. On a different level or thought tee the question which that introduced onenother occasion: fIn what way can miristianitybest be brought back again peacefully‘into a single sheeps foldt'fm Among the nys suggested were the abolition of sectarianiah, which was be- lieved to breed intolerance; elimination of all sacraments in the church save baptism; the gmrantee of freedom of thought and speech to everyone; and the avoidance with every means possible of all evil influences. Accordizg to loot one had to ‘push himself slowly through the narrow gate. f” 'fln the ideas and goals of the actors-.- teurs,"f states Xalff,’ a... any good and beautiful things, not in the lee-t their“ fight against nsrrow-mindedness and intolerance,“ and their concern for the independent development of the religious inner-4113.289 'hsnriocflloy put his ideas into writing in hgland in several letters to Gromell and in his schue for an ideal eumity, the extent to which he was influenced by his Dutch back- grand become more apprent. st Horst, Mg p. 181. a? Kalff, w, p. 4.63. so mg... p. 4.54. 29 9.11., p. 455. hptsr 111 m In new DURING m 11mm Dis outbreak of the ruritan Revolution in kgland (1642-1649) promised to and once for all the absolute power or the king end place in his stead a rule of Justice and liberty. But when the In was over Oliver Cromwell, although little disposed to so much power, emerged as a virtml military dictator. lb and his party of Independents excluded from the House of comene the n-eehy- terian members who would have restored the king and imposed their religion on the people of hgland in the form of a state-church. women soon discovered, however, that the remnant of the Ease of comnone, known as the amp hrliament, was 'fhcrridly arbitrary: and he soon had done with then. nae succeeding larlienent, equal? ly incapable, surrendered its authoriw to d-omweli, who then became Lord hotector. He governed as a benevolent despot from 1658 tones; The people who ind hoped for much better realised that many of their major grievances had not been removed. Attanpte were made to effect reform within the new regime. Among those who hoped to institute political democracy were the Levellers, notably John Lilburne and union welwyn. others, lime Gerrard Iinstanley end the Diggers, labored for the improvement of the social and economic‘position of the masses. Religion played a large part in these reform movemts. L continued separation of diurch and state and the abolition of the tithe were two denands 23 which were constantly made. 11ch arrived in Mgland in the last years of the Interrog- m,and :ust a few months before the death of Oromll. His first desire was to see fln'istendom established as a universal state in the form reminith of the m in Holland. 'fhving eeen: he later w-ote, “that Pcliq and heligion which (as cod is) ought-to be universal was divided and severed into mew-Bests, my spirit was much troubled; and looking round-about me, where to make a beginning to rectify those evils, I found no better object in Gristendom timn his late Highness the Lord actectcr; where- upon I resolved for a while to leave our family and native Country, fearing if i should not manifest to the Magistrates in mend mt was upon ny spirit that they, having much to do with other affairs, night through the subtilty of the Clergy, as in other rations, easily be deceivedfl fiesficy was perturbed at the domineering state-churches in 'fthese and other nation} and called them the 'flittls Antichrist»: (rhe 'fgreat Antichriet'f fie the rcpish church). He was espetially concerned because the non-privileged Mistian groups, for their diverseness and dis- unity, could do little to alleviate the situation. he scheme which he devised 'ftaethsr with some other lovers cf'ths eomon gccd‘f was to unite all Wistism sects in a sort of federation as 'fthe‘only way to abolish all lording over conecienceedf ‘ - Immanmmmlemmumm. h. 1. the ensuing quotations on this page new. i 24 town was assisted in his governnent by a council and a parliament. he first overture made by Plockhoy concerning his plan was to numbers of the council, through which he was granted an appointment lith the lord hotector himself. 'fI was heard several times with patienceflf'he wrote, 'fdoing nw‘endeavour to preserve Buglarll free: that great dishonour which let}: befallen ether lstionsdfz His principal ideas were embodied in two letters to Oren-ell, the first dated June 24, 1658, and the second neces- sarily following in short order since the noteeter died in Sep- tenber of the same year. rho project camouto melt in the months following the dictator's death. On January 24 of the followim year 21ch submitted a letter to Erliament, re-stating his purpose and enclosing the letters which he had previously submit-r ted to, Cromwell. he wrote: f...being obstructed in my proceeding through the unexpected death of his mghmss, I was put to some stop, waiting for a better opportunity, and hearing. tint your Honours were to assemble together upon the 27. of January, cw spirit was revived, hoping that my design for the peace and wel- are of these Nations by tint means, better than heretofore, might be accomplisheddf8 But hrliament gave him no encourage- ment. Wted in these first two attempts to gain support for his ideas Hockhoy hoped to 'fawakon the public spirits in Englandfl by publishing the letters topthe magistrates. he pamphlet m ‘ 8 mm. 3 m, p. 2.. 25 entitled. mmmmmmmmmmm. and was printed early in the year, 1659. the name of the printer was not indicated on the title page. Oliver won-ell was succeeded by his son, Richard, who for the few months he was Lord Protector attempted unsuccessfully to forestall the growing interest in the restoration of the monar- clw. lhe fourth letter which nockhoy wrote was addressed to him, fto the end that he [Ricard] may as a true lbderator so hold the balance in the Governnent that one Sect my not domi- neer over the other.'f4 He told Biclnrd that he had come into melded in love for the cannon good, and 'faftcr much longing several times lad opportunity to speak with your hther about di- vers matters, to whom also I delivered twa Letters, which he promised to consider of, and was willing I should have liberty further to declare nw mind and sense unto him. f5 his he said had been prevented by Oliver's unexpected death; and he no transferring the petitions, which his father had "not despised" to nichrd, who should "order all things in such a way that the lidlt of liberty kindled in menu may enlighten all Kingdoms and. Bevermemts in the world. f6 A. second edition of the letters, including the one to Bi- 7 curd, was published about the 4th of larch, 1659. his edition ——__—.'. em, p. 27. $1113., p. 38. em. 'I this date was assigned by the well-known contemporary book collector, George Manson. Although his dates are not infal- lible they represent a good approximation, probably within a week of the date of publication. Bee, mumm- mm. mewmm mm.mmm. “WWI: mm IMO-1661,11. p. 225. To THFPLACI; SET waiig: ‘1NT NAT! ‘ dlik("LlL\i lllt‘v ! I (2“‘1‘V'V"j t(\; A'--.'\~k'\i I‘L‘Idtc Highncnc, and or: U) [1.6 DICFCM ".lr'iil‘ifr‘. aHo one to hie Highncm‘.’(ch;v z I. Unfair): 0f lug/.0641, Si .t/Jml, 311d Hu’xzd, 6a. 11'1.’ F 11' 7‘ [:\' -"i..“‘ V.‘ i = T11; mm \t‘ of ii‘ I ‘d'l’r \‘.i::‘ ~1\'.-r\'(‘~:' “out: for hirflchc) isthofcd agaiiifl Antic11. ' 1:} for the T'1)C1. wig 'Ifllxi.)m)f17, H) Mn [10' 1 (.3 .::'i- ..."!r' i, l 1 . t ‘ n11. Him pun; T.) nwukcnthc }"12l‘!!pk1}‘il'its m f 2.13.".2223 .12 wife up a.“ uvivcrfu‘. M-igzflrate in (1.. ' .ficndomc {Em '. ' I’Viifl'ei J" "Jr of V‘CJPIC. .W? 'A}H[ [{g' i f\(\'(rr " \ “'54 ...):1 (‘I‘CCUH‘ f), ‘K “‘G'r‘(:"LL _H HIM." " Ui<‘1~"i([ thc lizi. ~ i. In! L l xrcx ,i i? L w if}. i" '..L‘:l v is ' ’ \1ufth- 3. 13. .2162} a" ' . .1 (mil/iv .urz/ pt." 1/ It)/./:')‘ .1 [ix/fink z ' . ' , ind/rib: \. 421;." it giver!) [lg/.1! um.) .2 . ; ’m 117w [mu/c. ..—-—-—-—-———-——»~ By Peter Carmina) . ., /\ /[ J 1mg: “I H'Ulhnndpence, «’7 ~ Mkw-P‘tf 171.544 (c;7u‘(u ' m-_&-_ 1, () N120 ,\': Primed {UT UJHH'. ”if/i“. .1m'. .llg I') L‘LI‘ 1(in at hi35h<~p1irthc [Lin.;Ix--5[..il'..“. -iiri-e [Km/y Church-Yard. 1 W. Figure 1 TITLE-EGE 0F Tm LATER EDITION 0F PLOGKEDY'S, Egg WAY it; 1:11.“; PEACE AND SETTLEEIENT LF TIESE NATIONS 27 In Printed by hniel lhite and gave notice of famthor treatise, which is to be published, propounding a ray to no. the poor dis- tressed people in these and other fitions happy. fa meterin- who have dealt with the social conditions in new during the seventeenth century agree tht the situation of the poorer classes, more especially that of the industrial and agricultural laborers, was invariably bad. fires-fourths of the population (an estimted five million) lived by agriculture, and most of these were peasants or day laborers with very low levels of subsistence. hglish industry, in comparison to the continent, leasd behind, and was also curacterised by class distinctions. he most serious social problem was presented by the great mass of paupers, without education, occupation, or security} Emcee were the conditions which 110ch observed in hgland and with which his new reform program was concerned. he title of his new writing, comprising a scheme with great- er immediate significance although miller in scope than the tint. mimmmicmmmnmnmm mmmmmhm.mmmnn- WWMmanm mm. Mmmmmmmmnm figunmmmwmmm. ro 80. 9 A thorough study of the position of the poor msses in the early history of hgland was rude by air Roderick Eden, mm at. in. ML. or. at him of. the W 9.12.9511 in . (London, 1797). Appendix 17111 of Vol. 3 contains a list of writings of the period which sought in some manner or other the relief of the poor. Iiockhoy's writing is listed. 28 ammuniberuhemllhenimhnimw. It uas th initial plan for his ideal commonwealth, a semi-comnmn- istic settlement comprising four classes of people and based on equality and association. he first edition of the writing was ”printed for G. c." ‘ and issued approximately lay 28, 1659.10 d. 0. were the initials of Giles mlvert, agent for the Levellers. Line the previous writing it was written in connection, with others fborn tor the connon welfareflf his and a reference in the correspondence of sen-1 Ertlib,~quoted below, indioetee that nockhoy was partici- pant, perlrlps leader of, a group of closely-nit sympathiaers. Readers who were interested in the association were to contact nochoy tln'ough Giles alvert. is first states, this indicates that nocmy md connections with the leftist-reformers curing the red-item and, since the publication was not listed on the stationere' legister, thet he and his friends 'ffcund it expedient to proceed’covertly. ’11 A note at the end of the writing indi- cated that the first"little demon-wealth“ was already in opera- tion, ”settled in order as a Rusery about lemon,” and tint similar proiects were envisioned for hristol and lreland, fwhere we an have a great deal of land for little money and plentzzlra of wood for building of Euses,‘8hips, and may other thingsJ v— V— v V — 10 Mason’s 4-sta- 800. William-"WI: mm 1640-1661, 11. pp. 235-6. _ 11 Irvin first, "Pieter darneliss nockhoy: in Apostle of the dolls- clean." WWW mu. (July 1949). P- 167- ”imam r. 1i. .. _ ’ By Wan? roger er a fit. fumble, and well-quail eoplc intooncHouflaoldogovermnt, or little Common-wealth , thrcin ever one may keep his pr0¢ pri , and be im ycd in fame work or Other, as “In: billbc ht, without being we“. Beta the nor on! to rid thefetnd ether Nations from 8«He, :17, auddifgrdcrly perfons, hut alfo from all {nth as have fought and found out many Inventions, tolivc upon the la- bour of Olhcfl. h motels slfo tanned an [aviation to this Society , or Link W “ Common-walth. . 1 "sin .1. Male“: h thTafiln-ul the par, tit We“ “on “outta-often“: t the Midpoint” Bu, “Morph-0'. livtuelh M benefit eyes the m . I Ey PETER, 'GORNiLlS-SONJ'AN ZflRIK-ZBES' _¥ ‘_‘- ‘ l Lowbom for therthor, a: are (old at the Block SW otttthIWd'tnd of rash, t e 5 pr _. Figure 2 29 AN INVITATION s 0??? T Y ’=‘ “fr 1.: COMM ON-WEALTH. SHEWING The excellency of the true Chrithan love, and the folly of all thofe who confidcr nor to whet end the Lord of heaven and earth hath created them. M A 1'. n. so. Who/own ”)4, do the will of m} Faber whicbir in heaven , the/ante i: m} 3". tber, and S :fler, and Mot/m. A‘ Lennon, Printed for the Author. {old It the mult- aettthewmall. I ‘3 es WW TITLE-EGE OF THE LATER EDITION 0F BLOCKIDY'S, A WAY PROEQUIIDED AND THE TITLE-PAGE OF Tm "INVITATION" APENDED THERETO 30 A second edition of the writing was printed directly for the author and listed the places noekhcy could be contacted on different days of the week and at certain times of the «by: If any Husbandinan, leann, Mimftmn, or Artist, (being of an universal impartial spirit) have a desire to speak with him who is instrumental in the promotion of so good a work, my find him at these following places: On lbndays at four of the clock in the afternoon, at the hidgsfoot, the sign of the Bell. On i‘ueadays at four of the clock in the afternoon, in lpittlefields near Biehopagte-street, at the Red Lion. On Iodnesdays at ten of the clock in the morning, in Xingetreet at the sign of the Lntilope. On the same day at four of the clock in the afternoon, upon great flower-Hill at the Red (law. On Ihuradays in the afternoon at he of the clock, at Stanhop-street between new hrket and bury lane, at the sign of the Ihite Eras. On Pridays at two of the clock in the afternoon, at west-hithtield at the George Inn-13 Beth editions contain an appendix, with eepei-ete pagimtion, entit- 101. ummmwmamhmm- m, which set forth the 'fmllency of the true fliristian love, and the folly of all those who consider not to whet end the lord 14 of heaven and earth hath created them'f It attempted to advance moral and Christian reasons why Inch a-society should be created. it the end of the writing was a letter by Iioehhoy's sympathiaers em financial backers, which appealed to: runner-e: firing not only considered the poverty, afflictions, and straits of any well minded people, together with the evil consequences that arise from the corrupt customs and way! of meat «uployrnents, an! the general disorder pro- ceeding from riches and poverty: butalso the way preponn— ded by our friend, rotor Oornelisoen, to rectify all such 13 ammmmmmmm p. 14- 14 m, titlepage. ‘ 31 am saw other inconveniences by bringing together a fit, suitable, and well qmlified people into one Household- Oovcrnment or little Osman-wealth, wherein every one my keep his propriety and be employed in some work or other as he shall be fit, without being oppressed, as is more at large expressed in a Platform to tint purpose. whereupon we are resolved, Judgiu it to be necessary, and our duty to promote so good and pious a work, with the assistance of othr merciful and ratidml men, to lay such a foundation as may tend to the relief of the oppressed, the preserving of such as are in danger of falling into snares, and the increase of understanding and mutual love, as also the exemplary ordering of such acts as my be accomplished by prudential charity. And hereunto we do earnestly invite all Persons that have a willitg mind to do good according to,_thcir abili- ties, some by their Wisdom and Counsel, others by money and credit, or by both, as they shall be able and free, that so a stock may be raised for the carrying on of this good and beneficial work. 50 which end we have subscribed our names, and the sums of money which we are willing to give. Eping that all such as are for so general a work will upon due consideration likewise subscribe for such a sum of money as they are willing to give towards the accomplishment of the Premises, and meet together to confer and order the said sinus of monies into the hands of some trusty Persons, for the use and benefit of the Society only,and wandhat also shall be found conducing to the perfecting of this work, till the Society can subsist of itself in order, which we believe may soon be from the credible informtion of divers persons, re- lating that many hundreds in transylvania, Hungary, and the hltsgrave country, fmm a shall beginning have attained, not only to a very comfortable life among themselves, but also ability of doing much good to others, not of their Society. Dubscribed towards the raising of a stock, as follows: Is I. '- " """"1°0e lo I. B. — ——— - v _ 400. 1. O. O. — . 7— -_ 10. 1. I. W. . — a — — —— 30. l. R. 8. -w —— -— — — 10. l. P; O. ——= == 10. l. 1,1- 1). _ —=- to. 1.15 Unlike. the first this project was not presented to the govern- ment, but was to be inaugurated by individual grants from qualified —'———v w T 15 33“., pp. 13-4. 32 persms who would then act as 'ffathers'f of the enterprise. The undertaking seemingly did not prosper after the Restoration of Mlss II in mgland, although it led received some support. Among others active support came from flannel hrtlib, who soli- cited for Plecthoy in several letters. hrtlib was a utopian, extremely interested in the relief of the poor and other social problems. His most important work was gm of, m m We of m. m m 83.1.1125. mutant. in gm (Iondon, 1641). His belief in science was the basis of his views-on social reform. In his ideal state there were five executive councils: for husbandry, fishing, trade by sea, trade by land, and new plantations. no goal of life at hearia was 'fto achieve the highest possible productive capacity in agriculture by scientific farmingflf16 He seems to have borrowed heavily from h'ancis Bacon. l’or ...... of the unemloyed he devised an elaborate machinery concerning the exchange of labor. His relation to noel-hey doubtless came about by their counon interest in the relief of poverty in accordance with floristian precepts and the stimulation of agriculture and industry. John Deal, scientist and fellow of the Royal Society, described hrtlib es 'fthe sealous solicitor of Garistian peace peace amongst all unions. mmmnmm th- tru- hearted lover of our native country, ti); seculous advancer of in- genious arts an! profitable sciencesflf hrtlib states in a letter M w V—r 15 Iilhelm son-m:I mmmmmm mm W London: Iceman. Green and co.. 194.0 ,,_p. 14s. 17 3.. dedicationto Hun-nib of John Deal's, W m aflianfanellhsm- (london. 1557 Italics moi-toe. e 33 to Dr. John Iorthington, Vice-Glancellor of (hmbridge University, dated July 20, 1669, that he had forwarded nockhoy's, Am m, to Deal, who had previously written: '71 do extremely indulge the design of beginning the Buildings of eniotion so- cieties in small lbdels. And in this point our Reforms may learn new parts of wisdom from our sorest adversaries. 2 IL mm: 'lis strange to me, that the Model of Cristian society, and-that curious offer or the right‘hand of alristian love hath taken no deeper footing in mgland. ”.18 And in still more enthusiastic terms in another letter, heal had written: '30 tint all the religious houses of the Glristian world were reformed into true societies, or that our hglish monasteries could be thus restored: But it seems we men are prompt and skilful enough to pull down, and then leave .it to God to plant, build, and reform, whilst we talk big of reforming laws and mating whole nations churches and of erecting the Kingdom of wrist all over the world. I would I could see a good beginning (Ia means of a Mistisn society)‘ with a little, as upon that ......oo, 1 should not be unwilling tint :00 acres or mins on land were devoted to the foundation of the first such college)?” In the same letter to Icrthington admit included a dominion“ a similar model of a ~—v—~——v Yv-l- 13 Jem- Oroulor. editor. no. man an 1' Warmlm , 1. (lhnchesterq The metham Society, 1847), p. 157. s work is Vol. XIII of the series under the title, m . a Lineman White m alanine manila: of m m-m- , ” Hartlib's note. I 19 ...... (no-slay. m, p. 158. 34 continuity of the Moravian Brethren who were located in Ihngary and Iran-ylvania. (firtlib was a personl friend and apostle of nonunion, leader of-the lei-avian Brethren). rho description came from the pen of Oomenius' son-in-lawiand contains an interest- in: comparison of the lbravian Brethren with the Mennonites, des— cribed in Ghapter 11: hey Moravian Brethren are an honest, simple-hearted people, humble, godly, laborious, well trained up, and lovers of discipline, agreeilg for the most part in sub- stantialibus of y” Doctrine with the Reformed Churches, save only in the Infant Baptism. Yet they shew them- selves more careful in this point, then those people 'ch are called the llennonists in t Low countries, who permit their children to live w Illout baptism as long as they list. But these men leave it to their childrens pleasure no longer, but when they are of ten or 12 years of age, and have learned their catechism, and can make a confession of yr faith openly before the congregation, they do their utmost by informtion d: perswasions to me them desirous to be Joined as members of Christ to the rest of the corgregatienfio i'he letter appended to mothers, A fly hopounded (see above) . . 21 ends mention of this religious, commistic group. The descrip- tion which Hartlib quotes is similar in many respects to nockhoy's scheme, and. is perinps its prototype. It is likely, at any rate, tint l’lockhoy was acquainted with the details of this religious society,” whose influence on him is apparent from part of the des- cription which follows: fliers be so new families (suppose loo, zoo, or more) woh Join together 8: be of all kind of trade (useful and. comfortable for nnn's life, for no guns, swords, or other war-like weapons are made amongst them). mess being received into the mgistrates' protection, 6: having pri- vileges and permission to build, out of the. solution stock, a certain court as it were, or a little commonwealth, with 3, 8, or more yards, according as the number of 20 .1119». p. 157. 21 Erst thinks the reference in the letter .applied to the Moravian Anabaptists, or Hutterites, who were also living in oomnunistic societies in Koravia. In view of Oomenius' agnostion, however, this seems unlikely. See Horst, 93,311., p. l . ‘ 35 inlnbitants d: artificers doth increase, with so new dwellings a: public conveniences for horses, cattle, and the like. As for their co-habitation, every family hath a convenient telling-place, a every trade to- gether, tailers, shoemksrs, do" and each a separate yard. 'm'ieir labour is common, all work for all, for what every one gaineth, it is given to the common stock. is for their government, they have a preacher or two, according as need requires, wth an Oecononlus, whom they choose by cannon consent, a 3, 4, or more elders or overseers. may have for their religious a pious exercises, public meetings on the Lord's day, as well as every day for public prayers in the morning & evening; all things being performed in good order and decenq. i'he men sit asunder from the women, and so children likewise, of both sexes, apart. They have schools for boys separate also from those of the girls. And the training up of their children, as soon as they begin to have the use of their tongue, till they come to their full age, is committed of the boys to grave men, of the girls to godly women. l'he parents have no trouble with them at all. The steward ani elders pro- vide all things. niey have their own bakers, brewers, to. , every one hcth his office in w°h he serves himself do others. here is a demon kitchen for them all. file Oeconomus, preacher, and elders eat together, the rest in like manner, save that men have their on tables, and women also their own. And every one knoweth his own place. be discipline is either private corregtion according to the fault, or public excommnication. 3 Just when 210ch returned to the letherlands is not known. A reference as late as October 15, 1660, four and one-half months after the Restoration of the second hrles to the English throne, reveals that he was thinking in terms of settlement near Gologns. Bartlib writes in a letter to Worthington of tut date: "1 am told that count de Worth (whose territories are not far from .Oollcn [Cologne] hath published a letter of Invitations to all laticns of wht Religion soever, offering cheapness of lands and protection, d tint a thousand of the fransylvanian society or Brotherhood,“are cone thither already. hter carnelian, of 82 James @ossley, 93,311., pp. 168-5. 36 23 hiricksea, is likewise going thither with many others} It is easy to understand why 210ch would have wished to leave nnglhnd at this time. ihe‘neetoretion doubtless put an end to the few leftist reform movements still existing after almost twenty years of Puritan rule. lhether he reached Germany is not noun. in the latter part of 1661 he was back in Holland pro- moting the colony on the Delaware in iner ice. ' he above references established Plockhoy's connection with nartiib and other noted personalities or the rcriten period. schenr enggeete that Plockhoy may have known villion Walwyn as well. “his hglish style is, indeed,'f writes dchenk, 'fquite close to hlwyn's, and it is not impossible‘that he was helped by Hal-- wyn or a an of a similar outlook; it is unlikely that his cemnd of English would have been sufficiently great to enable him to write these pamphlets without aid from a native Englishmndfz‘ A1- thongh there is little way to substantiate a connection, it‘eeene highly probable that the initials fw.v.'f among the seven financial contributors to Elechhoy's projectisse‘above) belonged to William veleyn. Ialwyn one the-Levellers in 1549 and was henceforth sn- gcged in hehind-the-ecene‘rerorn activities. Little is known about him during the following decade. debut-knows that in 1,659, the same year Plockhoy wrote his pamphlets, him was a member of a comittee which was to discuss Jams Ihrrington's proposition 85 . for a 'fOoumonwealth or Democracieflf there is much that is simi- 33 M's I" 211' 24 tilhelm Schenk, 93.31., p. 144. 35, Me, pa 4:3. 37 la: in the ideas of lalwyn and Plockhoy. The former set forth his ideas concerning man and society in his major work, Q; m 91 193, (London, 1643). In the preface he answered the question, 'rould you We all things comment". by referring to the comnism of the early Apostles: "And you may remember the multitude of believers had all things cemean26 He envisioned the ideal socie- ty as a small voluntary association of Christians with “universal 27 assent thereunto from all and every one of the hapleff which ideas were inherent in nockhoy's plans. ‘ I In addition to Walwyn it in possible rloohhoy was familiar with the communistic utopia of Gerrard Winstanley, leader of the Digger movemmit of the same period. In his unam- nggg, 'instanley wrote that in his comnity, |fillers shall be no trying and selling or the earth, nor of the traits thereof....If they want a horse to ride, they may go into the fields in scanner or to the common stables in winter, and receive ‘cne from the keepers, and when the Journey is performed, bring him back....is every one works to advance the cannon stock, so every one shall have free use of any comedity in the storehouse for his pleasure and comfortable livelihood, without buying or selling or restraint from anybody. f” Vinstanley anticipated 210ch by his advocacy of a. eomnity with private family life one furniture, but he went further in his devotion to the cannon ownership of property. “w 26. Iilliam lalwyn , mm 91.1911.- (London, 1643), pref. an Falwyn, Lilburne, hints and Overton, LW 21. than Manilanialaikzallau. (Londone 1549)» at Geri-era win-tanley, In. a 9; W. (London, 1654). . . e ’ . ._, 'e. n , e i - I . - s . V t _ . , . . . e . . a. ’ a e. i _ ‘ t , e: . . . .. e . n . ‘ v. . . . r v s , ‘ ~ ‘ - - , r- ' . \ ‘ e s s _ . - ‘ 38 Like Schsnk, George habody Gooch believes that Mglish in- fluence upon Plockhoy was evident. 'fl'hough these renarhable ‘ pamphlets euanated iron a RitchimnflhGoooh writes, "they were written in neglish and with a full inner-ledge of mlish affairs. And from the fact tint such speculation was unknown in the Low Countries at this time, ‘it is hardly fanciful to attribute thu to hglish influence. '3” Beech errs somewhat in his assertion of the non-existence of radical social ideas in the Netherlands. is was seen in the last chapter the influence of neckhoy's Dutch background was not minor. fhis suggests an interesting notion tint there was much in coma in the socio-religicus movements in Bol- land and 33819.34 and that radical ideas reciprocated between the two countries. lbs collegiant principles as well as those of the lamist lhimonites and W are easily discernible in l’lookhoy's letters, which outline his religious program. But it in probahly correct to say with Coach tint they are insufficient to explain his interest in economic and social betterment. as fact tint. his interest in the poor came after he had been in England for awhile further indicates tint he was influenced by his contact with the leftist reform movements in England. It is evident also, as shill be pointed out in Glapter III, that hecthoy knew the works of such men as Sir Bhutan More and villism Shakespeare. He writes himself, however, that his greatest stimlation came from the Scriptures. Will nan ever reach the place, he asks, when he will festeem one only sentence of the holy a :9 Gears. 2. cooeh. mmnwwmnm ' WW» (midget University been, 1898), p. 310 39 Scriptures more than the highest accuteness of all the World's hilesopluf'f it is somewht ironic to note his answer to the question in‘the paraphrase of William Shakespeare, one of the great world philosophers. "Vs shill be able to do it,'f he con- eludes, 'fif we did well weigh that the World's turn is but a short Qumedy, and that we are but Actors who appear no more than 30 once upon the 8tage.'f mammmwm p. 6. Gapter 1' warm I]! m minimum) in 1.113316 m rule of the Dutch in America of the territory called How Katha-land dates from 1621, with the organintion of the Dutch lest India company, to less, when the anglish invaded the ire- vince andwon control. the first colonists in the novince were under author ity or nitroons, who were stockholders in the Com- paw. he mJority of these settlers were day laborers or inden- tured servants. the new mmmemptu by the company in 1640, however, provided for similar, more liberal grants to free individuals. the population of New lather land grew between 1640 and 1660 although never sufficiently to guarantee a great prosperity. the hitch were primrily traders, not farmers; and the agricultural development of the cololw lagged behind that of the English colonies which surrounded it. the Oompaw's mer- cenary poliq was the chief criticism of individuals at home and abroad who were sincerely interested in the development and wel- fare ef the Dutch celolw in America. we of the most vocal among the reformers was Jacob lteendam, noted in mapter II as friend of 110ch and poet-member of Jan zest's, 'fflwest nest.'f atesndam wrote his yacht. m Winn (Olmplaint of new imstsrdam) after havim lived some time in the hevince and observed first heat the conditions there. he complaint was followed by the 2 .191 m W (rrsisc or new nether-lens) in which stcenosn portrayed the excellent qualities of new Netherland, 'fthe purity 41 of the air, the fertility of the soil, production of the attle, [end the] abundance of game and fish....'f1 His real object was to encourage the emigration of a class of people interested in hus- bandry as well as comes. The part of the bovince whieh was least profitable to the notch Iest Indie company wee the region of the south (Delaware) 31rd, relieved from New Lnetcdam far enough to rake communication difficult. In April, 1657, the Company signed tie region over to the Burgomsters of Amsterdam; and the capitol of thiseouthern area was henceforth known as In Amstel. In an attempt to popc- late this region the Burgomstcs promised prospective farms 'fin free, fast and durable property‘f as m “fl-organs [2.1 screeJ, teth of plenghleui and of meadow, es thq could properly improve, with freedal from tenths for twenty years. ‘3 necrhoy was one of the“ few who sought to derive advantage from this belated attempt to people the hitch colony. It is imedistely apparent after repeated failures in Mend tint his Isl as e reformer was m a bit deterred. Holland was at tint tine no less in need of social rerorn then noglend, inspite of the upitalistic advances of the 'fGolden AgeJ fit is only too true,'f writes nerke, fthet the neeeee of the townepeopie received e ..., shell share in the marvelous profit realised by the economic expan- V 1 Ellis L. Baesly, mu, nth W (New tort: Oolumbia University tress, 1945), pp. 386-7. . 2. Clarence I. fiifs, “land'Tenure in New nether-land," m a, salaried. Elihu helm in. mm 929.12. mm in. hie. My. (New Even: file University hose, 1931), p. 61. 4:2 sien of the country. ...In the busiest center of Iblland's indus- try, twenty thousand people--not necessarily unemployed—Ind to be kept from starvation by charity, and it was truly said that in “strum contagious diseases which took the lives of thousands of poor people, never afflicted 'burgonasters, aristocrats, ministers of the Grinch, or town‘officials. "fa It was again the poor nasses with whom l’lookhoy was concerned. he hec from the beginning of hie negotiations with the inter- dam hargouasters twenty-four Hennonites (families) who wished to participate in his project and who formed the basis for the negotiations. The identity of these Mennonites has never been established but it is likely they came from the lemist Mennonites of Galenue Abraham de man's church in Amsterdan, who would have been most inclined to subscribe to the intellectual freedom and the liberal philosophy of the proposed settlement} After making several overtures to the Burgomasters (see below), this group petitioned the city of Ametereem for e tract of land on the south liver and 200 guildsrs in loan to each family. The Amsterdam council record followss. Resolution of the Common Gouncil cf the City of Amster- dam, 30th Apri1,1662. he Bureomsters have also reported tint about 25 Mennonist families Ind declared their inclination to remove to and reside in tin city 's colony in New Nether- land, if this city would resolve -to assist each family 3 Bernard Home. Wflmmm (Nov rem Roy robiiehere, 1945), p. 173. . t Hennonite's ind already taken part in the settlement of law Netherland- 309. WMQIEEMKM W compiled by E. 2. (Jamie. (Albany, 1901-1916) I, pp. 320, 335-6, 348, 887-8, 396, 486-7, 505, 5154:, 555, 667; n, p. 1053. 43 to that end with 200 guilders for each, in addition to the passage money, on conditions that such families would Jointly and severally bind themselves to repay the same. lhich being considered it is resolved to lend each family 100 g1. on such conditions, the pas- eege money therein 1ncluded.5 ‘ nockhoy nade some additional requests after the Resolution was passed, and on June 6, 1662, completed a contract with the Burgomastcrs. It stated 'fi'hat he, Pieter Garneliss nockhoy,‘ undertaioss to present to us, as soon as possible, the names of twenty-five persons, who will agree to depart by the first ship or ships to the aforesaid colorw of this city, to reside there an to work at farming, fishing, handicrafts, etc., and to be as diligent as possible not only to live comfortably themselves, but also tht provision nay thereby be made for others to corned: The contract granted each member or much land ee he could use at the 'fmrekil'f or another part of the colorw, the right to enact their own lewsqwith right of appeal to the higher magistrates, exemp- tion from tense for twenty years, and a loan of 100 guilders to each family as previously granted. It took 110ch almost a year to get underway. The factors responsible for the delay were several. In the first place the group was still engaged in the construction of an adequate frame- work of government, the privilege of which was granted them by the contract. Flockhoy's ideas for the administration and govern- ment of his colony hadprcviously been submitted to the Burgo- wfi 5mmwm 1.1. p. 176- 6 M, pp. 176-7. The origiml contract was also reprinted as part of nockhoy's, £01123 flap; m1. lbr its full text, see Appendix B. , . meters by an individual who signed his name, ”ELLMJ fhe latter was seemingly an attorney or notary who served as an . agmt for nockhoy in the negotiations with the Burgonasters. rhe program was outlined in seven letters submitted through 'HJ. 5.1!." to the ngistrates between November 22,1661, and ray 25, 1662. file fourth of these letters was the most significant, containing 117 articles of association, which were "open for correc- tione'f? ‘ he first letter was written November 23, 1661, and was pre- sented to the Burgomastsrs on December 13. It was submitted by 'fHJ.Z.M.'f with 'fproper homge‘as agent for his clients, consisting of several decent-minded families who desire to remove to New lsthsrland undc the auspices of this laudable city and Goverment of Amsterdam, and with the an. sire Directors or the vest India company under app-m1 e: the states eenerei or the United nether- lamb?a he agent wanted it blown that he was servant to his flatter- and hincipalsfl and wished to remain anonymous. 'fIt any please your Honors,'f he continued, fto grant a charter to these people, with so many families as thiay mve already or will further- more enlist, to transport them to the South River in law Hetherland, and there to select according to their choice a suitable piece of 7 mmmmmm- p. 68. 6 M” p. 43. Sets of initials like "E3.” or “LA." are fre- quently used in addressing the Burgomasters and high officials. "A” stands for mu, "I“ for W, "H' for m, and "it” for mighty. When they ate used double, they refer to more than one person, such as the LL. htrons. 45 land near the Borekil [Glosst also called Sinkenesse or Slammed] or wherever else they might deem more favorable. f9 One of the prinnry purposes of the project, in addition to reviving the colonial Province, was 'falso the relief of many aggrieved and languishing families. '10 An aspect of Plockhoy's philosopltw, descending from the conegiente and included in his previous plan for a universal church without clergyman, was included in this first letter to the Amsterdam magistrates. 'fconcerning the divine worship,'f it was stated, ‘fthese people wish to save the costs of a minister, and for the‘maintenance of good order, peace, and least offense to the different humors of the peeple, to substitute the Holy Scriptures, to be read on Sundays and holi- days by individuals in rotation, it being the purest minister, and to aim psalms. ’11 the second letter, dated December 20, 1661, brought up he legal points in question. he first was the matter of govern- ment, which they desired to be in all points in harmony with the interests of tin society and still with the laws of the country. the second question was the matter of freedom from tenths, which was desired for a period of thirty years. In relation to the first, distinction use made between civil and criminal laws; and it was to be known that the society wished Jurisdiction in civil cases only, and that criminal uses would be left to the Juris- 9 1113., p. 43. Swanendael meant literally, 'fvalley of swans.'f 16M - 11 m- a I. 1J1; ,1 d . .elt. .0. . o'l 71*. .I ..bueefl'alirgj‘. 46 diction of the high magistrates. "hbout everything which is con- fined to the civil, thy muld draft a my}; concise aggeggnt, 12 with the apparel of the LL. Sire Burgomasters of this cityflf In reprd to the question of tenths, reasons were given wlw a“ period of thirty years exempt ion should be granted. Nc sensible people who can look further than the length of their noses have tried or will try to move to I!!! Amstel under existing conditions. hr those over there who have thus far seemed to be of some ability have mostly been attracted by ambit ion for power, or expected profit, but since neither living conditions or trade turned out to be very favorable those people Eve, along with others, been undeceived, and New Amstel, which for so many years was supposed to develop into a city, could in number of people, not speaking of the poverty there, not compare with even the least country- side in Holland....donsidering this my ibsters instruct ms to petition the Add. Sire Burgonnsters that they increase, rather than reduce, she requested number of years of freedom from tenths.1 rho hatter of tenths, states marches Rife, was of considerable importance to prospective emigrantsf‘ It had proved to be a burdensome charge, and 'fhad the reluctant acceptance of the popu- lace. '15 Probably Ploclrhoy was aware of those turd-hips, permps through his frienl {Janet steenden, and ineietes upon an ixununity in this resptct. I the third letter, dated December 3, 1661, sought to furthu' clarify the matter of civil and criminal Jurisdiction. 'ffliq do not in the least desire criminal Jurisdiction, but on the contrary they free thmselves from the same and clearly reject it as too 12 M" p. 4-5. Italics inserted. 13 m" p. 46. 14 Clarence Rife, “1., p. 62. 15 Min p. 65. lee ‘teye. lii'lllql‘. 47 16 difficult a task for them.'f It was requested, however, that firing the first five years they would be given the privilege of disposing of all civil matters themselves. After that time the Sheriff of In Lutel would have the right of inspection, to cite witnesses, etc. 5 should lave no right, though, to begin legal proceedings against anyone without notifying the principal public servants of the society beforehand, or to execute domici- liary search or arrest without previous consent of the principal servants. Matters of dispute beheen the society and sheriff should be submitted to the LL. Eatrons and highest Directors. concerning the matter of taxation, thirty-years exculption was still requested for reasons previously stated. In closing, it was asserted: My Masters and Clients wish it known that this and all previ one and forthcoming statements, written or oral, concerning the proposed settlement, are tentative outlines, intending the best for the society, with no intent to Judge, mch less criticise any existing form of government, since they wish not to be Judged or considered so mive in the ways of the world that they would not know how different conditions, natures of people, as well as differences between large and small societies, require diff- erent methods of governmmt." The fourth letter, dated Jamary 10, 1662, contained the 117 articles of association, mentioned above. Equality was the firt and foremost basis of the commealth. prular government was to be inaugurated, the powerstherein separated into branches suggesting the executive, Judicial, and legislative functions. New laws were to be enacted by maJority vote and there was to be ~— lémmhsrlmmmmo p- 47. 1.7 Dildo.»- 48- nihil- . IT - , . rat). ”Irv!!! will 48 a single executive, elected by the people, who should approve all new 1m. Military servants were to be included in the so- ciety for protection, although Hennonites, who believed in non- resistance, were to be exempt from military service by paying a tax. Hemonitee also was to be exempt from voting on defense mttcs and fortification, and from orders from officers in this relation or concerning military service. the lhnnonites were further to have two representatives among the principal public servants. The people were to disembark upon arrival overseas 'fas straight hstavians and promoters of the common good, putting their shoulders to the wheel.'fl8 the fifth letter, dated {arch 3, contained rsvisions and amendments to the articles in the fourth. he Commissioners seen to have raised some objections to minor items and details of Judicial Jurisdicticn. he letter was an answer to certain mrginal notes nade by or in the m of the m. airs comm- toners on the 'sun lurther Benonstrance' which ... handed in before.'f19 P i ‘ ls; letharland was originally managed by a board of nine- teen directors ef the Dutch [est India Gompaw (the Nineteen), who was represutatives from five clnmbers located in different prts of the Netherlands. fhc delegates from the city of LII-ter- dam held preferred positions, and after 1645 assumed exclusive management of the colozw. m Amsterdam camber, with twenty di- 18 an... 1:.” 66. 19 m, p. 66. rectors, organised itself into committees,ene of which was the Gounittee for New latherlam. 1211s comittee had charge of all utters relating to the colony. Its members were referred to as the comissionsrs for New Netherlsnd. If a group of settlers desired to migrate to the cclozw the nutter might be presented to the slumber, but would normlly be referred to the commission- ers to deal with. When the mmpany sold the region of the South river to the city of Amstrdam, the transaction complicated- natters of Jurisdiction. the government of Amsterdam consisted of the council (vroedschap), having as members, and the burge- masters, who were elected by the council. Some of the council mentors were also directors in the chamber, and the latter were, at any rate, chosen from nominees by the burgomasters. Thus, Es! Amstel remained subordimted to New Amsterdam in Judicial matters. In applying for a charter nockhoy had to deal with three bodies--the comissioners, the councillors, and the barge- nasters. The first five letters were, in fact, addressed to all three: 'fTo the Honourable airs Oomissioners and Directors, cho- sen by the A.L.A81rs Burgonasters, under authority of the LA. council of this City of Amsterdam. 'sz In general the commission- ers would have to approve any framework'of government for a settlemt in the colony, the council would lave to authorise a loan of money, and the burgomasters would complete the contract. The last two letters, dated May 5 and May 25 respectively, were addressed directly to the burgonasters. l'he first begins by w a 20 mg.“ pp. 43, 45, 4:7, 50, and 62. 50 making mention of the foregoing addresses, both written and oral. It reveals tlnt on April 22, tin prospective emigrants were ad- vised to apply to the burgomasters for a charter ”with assurance that our proposals and requests have been well considered by their 1.1.".21 It reiterates Plockhoy's desire for free exercise of all Inndicrafts, trades, and commerce, freedom from tenths, an! liberty of religion. In short, 'fthe suppliants persist umveri ugly in all their requests, presentations, deductions, and debates as previously submitted and under correctionfl In ccnclnsim it asked for a speedy decision fin order to despatch one hundred sale persons still this sunrner, who during the winter might begin burning off the forest, preparing the soil, cutting the timber for building, and providing for the ones, in- cluding the women and children, that would follow next spring.'f i'he final letter refers to negotiations with the burgomasters, chiefh with Ocrmlis de Grasf, baron of South Polsbroek, which were soon to lead to an agreement. On June 6, 1662, the contract between Plockhoy ani the burgomasters was completed. In October the letters were published as part of an air-page work entitled, mm m m mun” (Brief Account of Du Bethe-lands Situation, Advantages, htural Qualities, and hauliar Suitability for Oolonintion; together with some Begiests, Repre- sentations, Deductione, etc. , presented for that purpose by some interested persons at different times about the end of the year. 1661 to the Burgonnsters of this city and their Deputies, etc.). 21 mg, 65. The ensuiig quotations on this page are 195,313, 51 KURT VEKHAEL y‘”&15 W. 41.1% NEDERIANTS Gclcgcmhcit, Dcu hdcn, Namcflijchoorrechu-n, cnby zondcrc bcqmcm cmicidt ter bevolkmgh: Mitsgsdcrs amigo Reg se/lcn Vertoogm, Deduflmz ,.en{ ten dlen cmdcn door ccnigc anfhcbbcrs ten vcrfchcidc tijdcn omtrcnt 't lactfi van 'tJacr 1661. geprefcntccrtacndc A. A. Hot-red Bun- e sausssr as EN dezchtcdc, ofdcrzclvcr E. E. Hec- lcn Gecommittccrdc , em. w W “but N Voot-Rcdcn ten Rom [about . “M m N Wettfcboswicgh sec dc Bock-vetkoopcn . m W W Q l‘atflr- of MSW. Figure 3 TITLE-PAGE OF THE KDRT VERMEL VAN I‘TIEUW IIEDERLANTQ s. In addition to the matter of government another factor de- layed the project. The original Iondon plan was designed for more thn twmty-five normal, and 210ch desired to enlist at least 100 before anbarking. Mewcre several allusions in the letters to the magistrates to the hope of establishing a colon which would grow to be a city or province. their thoughts, in spite of the stall progress already made, have chnged from a weak household or neighborhood which they first had in mind to the idea of founding a laudable province of city or state.'f22 This called forth the prospectus, entitled, m h m m (Brief and Concise Pinata the need for which was suggested in the second letter above, and the specific pur- pose of which was the enlistment of prospective settlers who were in sympathy with tin ideas underlying the project. The Irospectus was a sixteen-page quarto pamphlet including (1) a cow of the contract between Flockhoy and the burgomasters, (2) a sonnet by the hitch post, Karel Verloove, upon the maxim, I 'fUnicn We Strength” (5) nockhoyis scheme for the establish— heht of an ideal comnojuealth, nmmr in most respects to his Incision plan, (4) a poem by the hitch poet, Jacob Steendam, en- “ we P. 56- ”MinimisammmnaszlWh lishmmm.missnauidiimnlnsisllriniani wmmwua Wham mm(mmhwnmnlninhmm mmnmmwmwm mmwmummmmmnm mummnlmmmmmmmmm- mwmm. mediums: mmmmmmmm 221m mmmmmmwmmm MMummmm- (Amsterdam. 1662). Ken en klacr ontwcrp, I biennium Een onéfififig’ficcoort , :7} Q m‘ ’ wen arb'cpdf‘vntma en mocpc- latency/ban album-benchma- , lupbnm ntrlubm: DOOR Ben onde‘rlingeCompaguic ofte Volck-plsntipgwndcr dc protcaic vandc H: Mo: Hcercn Staten Generacl det vctccnigdc chcr-lano dengcnb {ondcr code: he: gunlti gcfa van dc Achtgerc Magiflrarcn dc: Sq Amt clrc. dam) .ac'n dc Zuyt-tcvicr in Nico-no. derolan'd op to «churn; Beflecnde in LssJ- hawk". Z 0-1/4"!ch Pct/51ml, 2111051ch ”ng: Amht‘fl-bylm, (s Motif": 1!”;ch "OI/hi es aunts/Eben". Monotone op b: booz-rctbtcn ban hm 1cm; tarpon: (slow as balm) monotone: mum. t'Samcn gcflclt Dar Pieter Camille. Pb: en. our ecu/elves es seine “f Jar-Iss1. Smicst. Anne 1662: Figure 4 TITLE-BXGE OF PLOCKHJY'S mmgpgpnam 53 54 titled "Sparring Verses," iniicating the intention of spurring on friaids of the uniertaking, and (5) a final statement that those desiring to Join the society should be prepred to depart by the middle of September. Rom the latter statement it is evident tin prospectus was publicised and circulated between the 9th of June, 1662 (the completion of the contract) and the middle of September of the same year (the tentative date of departure). Plocidioy's essay begins as follows: Since individuals we go with their particular fami- lies in some uninhabited or wild country often die or have little success or become ill for their inability, poverty, or isolation, we (as lovers of the common interest to advance our own and neighbor's welfare) intend to establish-«with the protectionof the High and Mighty States General of the United Netherlands an! especially with tlat of the Honorable Magistrates of the City of Amsterdam-ma company or society at the South River in New Netherland, consisting of a peaceful, harmonious, and selected people who will help one another in farming, fishing, and handicrafts, in 32 attempt to improve the lot of many who are oppressed. Yerloove's poem appealed to unity and concord as the supreme goal for the I‘Iettlanent.25 Steendam's poem paints an exaggerated picture of New Hetherland. Ha indicates the dream of establish- ing, in time, a commune: great size: "Communities the groundwork are of every state; they first thexlnmlet, village, and the city make; from whence proceeds the commonwealth; whose numbers great become, an interest in the common welfare take. ’26 Many of the eleven stanms ought to quell objections which had 24 Ina-m 25 See Appendix 6. 26 an m 31am. unmann- 300 Appendix D. 55 been advanced against the project. "Some persons seem to have had a religious fear of living in a state so democratic as the one planned by nockhoy. Steendam assured these conservative folks that God would not 111th his blessings from this New World community mgr-rely because it was to be governed by neither kings nor dunest Following is the concluding statement of the pamphlet: ‘ Those who wish to Join our compaxw should be ready to begin the voyage not later than the middle of September of this year, 1662, and may inquire about the departure in Amsterdam in the Brouerstraet, in th "Orclnrd of New Netherland" [Boomgaort] from 3-9 a.m. and on the Sea hm [zoo-slack in the “Golden Boat” [Gilt Boot] from 5—1 p.m., bu they met an- nounce themselves as soon as possible at the afore- said placee (so as to lose no time) as tint we, knowing the number of persons, may obtain provisions for one year am also with the necessary tools and other things to use over there. If someone muld like in send along with us some goods or merchandise to be sold over there, he will receive half of the profit besides his capital. If someone who resides here would like to be a partner for himself, his descendants or heirs, in our comon plantation to be established in the time of 4 or 5 years, and in the cattle and other profits forthcoming for the community, he may make Bimeelf known in order to nabs a contract with us.2 The number of people that finally agreed to migrate is 29 not certain, but the number must have been far short of neck— hoy's dreams. The group, at any rate, sailed in the ship,‘§_t_. M, shortly after the 5th of my, 1663. (It is possible an ——7 27 3111- 1~ belly. 2mm: of. he! W (New York: Golumbia University bees, 1945), p. 291. -v 28 £911 an the: entrant; (no pagination). 29 Francis Vincent states the mnnber was'thirty-five men. See, a 3.1.1293: of. the. mile of. mm. (Philadelphia: John Oomp- bell, 1870), p. 393. The source for this is not given. 56 advance group embarked in the previous Fall as planned). A part of the invoice of goods of the St. Jacob follows: on 2!. k1. ML 21 Invoice of goods shipped in the ship, "St. Jacob," skipper, later Lucas van der Goes, destined to go to; Sew Lmstel on the South River of New Netherland.... I O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O 0 O O C Q 0 O O O Q 0 0 later Gernelissen Plockhooy takes along for himself and his family-«all kinds of necessaries and shall arti else for his own use, as for agricultural purposes and clothing, etc. , also 2 half bags of hops, guns for his people.... 0 The 31. my, arrived at New Amstel on July 28th, 1663, laving left "Al souls with their baggage and farm utensils at the Herekiljsl commonly called Ssaanendael (valley of swans). Since Pleckhoy was to have settled at the Horekil, his people were undoubtedly the forty-one 'fsculs'f. A. year later, on August 27, 1664, the notch were forced to surrender lsw lstherland to the mglish naval forces. The fort at Ilsw Amstel resisted, and during the following month Sir Robert, Mr preceded to reduce and destroy the forts all settlunents along the Delaware. 'fUnder him the only blood was shed which accompanied-the change “from Dutch to English author- ity.'fg A later account of the mmpaign contained the statement tht‘darr ‘fdestroyed the Quoting society of 310ch to a naile.'f” One scant piece of informtion remins concerning the brief“ 30 mmmmmmh 111. pp. 428-9- 81 m, pp. 435-7. 33 Albert E. McKinley, "The Transition from hitch to English Rule in 3" 1011!."me IL (April 1901) p. 718. - ”EIMWW. 11. Po 343- 57 existence of the settlement. One of its members had written to the city of Amsterdam stating that the Indians at the Horekil 'fhsd declared they never sold the hitch aw land to inhabit.'f34 it seems apparent tInt Plockhoy encountered nothing but difficulty and heartache at the very outset. Mr's procedure was entirely at odds with the Duke of York's instructions tht the people were to be treated with Wty and gentlenessflf55 Ed mn- heen less destructive it ‘is probable the settlement at Manon- dael would have left a greater imprint in the colonial history of America, for the English government proceeded to pursue a liberal policy in relation to the conquered Dutch peoples. As it is, there remins no record or the rate or the menbers or the colony, save Ileckhoy himself. ”Estory throws no light on the subject, and of contemporary documents there are none. '336 Some believe they were sold as slaves in the southern colonies.” Perleps they returned to Elland. It is most liloely they became lost in the shuffle and confusion of the clange in administration. “M‘s P' 3‘6 35 not... in Miss M. Andrei". mmmnmm W, 111. (New Even: Yale University hose, 1935). P. 98. 36 Samuel W- Emmet". W mWMn-n (Eliladelphia, 1883). p. 50. 37 this is corroborated by Stuyvesant 's statement concerning the hglish invasion of the Delaware: "At New Amstel on the South River, notwithstanding they offered no resistance, but demanded good treatment, which however thq did not obtain, they were invaded, stript here, plundered, and many of then sold as slaves in Virginia.” 300. .11 19.21 92.123421. W. no pp. 230-1. fossibly the English navy still sought retaliation for the measure of figlieh traders at Amboim in the hitch met Indies in 1628. 58 If we knew the names of am of them, which we do not, we could doubtless find traces of their continued existence in the neigh- borhood of the Delaware, as we have of 210ch himself. nockhoy seemingly claimed a plot of ground in the new Mich tern of Lewes (now Lewes, Dela-are), near the original cite of his settlement, and built a temporary cabin for himself 88 am his wife. later he petitioned for 1091 ownership of the let. lhe court acted on January 9th, 1682: Upon the peticon of anelis nockhoy the Court Chant unto him the towns Iott that he live upon in Lewis and the Lott next AdJoyning to that; on Don- dition that he build a dwelling house on Echo of the said Lotte according to the demencons that the Governor shall order, within one years after this Wt; or Else to pay five pounds to the use of ghe public]: for mche Lott; and Lose his Lotte also. 9 0n n. can of lay, nockhoy declared allegiance to anglers and became s. citisen thereof: ibis day John Kiphaven, Alexander lbulston, El- manias Iiltbanck, cornelis Yahoofe, Glrmlis John- son, beach Henry, 0ornelis nockhoy, AnthonyHamen (firemen?) Alias Heverle, haveing publiquely in opin Gets-t salmonly promised and declared in the presence of God Alleaigance to the King of England, his heires sill successors; and fidelity to William lam, hop- rietary and Governor of the provience of Eonsylvania c {territories thereunto belonging and to his heires 8: successors; After which the Governor declared all of them to be Eterellised and as free men of this Government as aw hellish men."o 38 the Federal Writers' Reject, m, (Now York: Viking Ereee, 1938), p. 196, contains the statement: "Oormlis nockhoy later swore allegiance to the hglish, and in§1680 a lot was granted to him in this town where 'he already be a house. "' The latter clause is seeminglye direct quotation from'an original source, which the writer has been unable to locate. 39 6- E 3- Earner. 01-. grammars-mm. m. (Misdelphia, 1909), p. 87. hglish documents of the period used the Old Style mlendsr, while t1- Intch employed the New. 40 me, p. 97. Punctuation mine. neqnent allusions to the 59 he years later Ploukhoy and his wife appeared in Germntown, where they becane public charges. Perinps,’ having grown old and blind, he was unable to fulfil his obligtions in Lewes, and lost his land. is an only resort he turned to his fellow Mennonites, who led Just recently established the Germantown settlement, for assistance. ms petition was not in vein. The Geruntown Court records show that he was treated sympathetically: .- , ma Mon ..m m at. cm. lira math. £2515. to the blind man, Garnelis Plockhoy, is granted the citisenship free of charge; and is granted per- mission to reside at the end of the village on the street from Peter clever 's corner upon a let one red broad and twelve rods long whereon shall be built a house with a garden which shall be his as long as he and his wife are living, but upon their death the property with all improvements shall return to the commnity. It is further decreed that Jen Doeden and Iilliem Bittenlmysen shall take a free-will offering for him and shall have clarge of the building of the house. 0 O O O C O O O O C O O O C O O O O O O O O l O O O m Mien. mm a: a: the let. him- At the end of the Session, the business brought up by Mcr Clever was discussed, which concerned Wm. Btreyper, who gave an acre of his land to Cornelis nockhoy for as long as he and his wife are living. hoes shall be planted around the house; and after they have died or have moved, the property shall he evaluated 1y an impartial comittee, its worth deter- mined, and so 1d. Elf slnll go to the community, and half to In. atreyper; and the latter shall have the right to reclaim the land. ‘1 individlnls li sted with no ckhoy are found in, M m mnmkmmmhannut mammal. 1§46-1§72,.(Vlilmington, Delaware, 1899 . .Verhoofe was a public surveyor and clerk at the Horekil. Kipshaven was a Justice (see halos). The hire of York had deeded the‘ "ferrit ories" of the Delanre River to William Run as far south as mp6 Henlopen, which included the region of the firrekil. . 41 321.. W m The.crigina1, in old Germ script, is preserved in the archives of the Historical Society of Iennsyl- vania. ' 60 the last known reference to Plockhoy is dated January 14, 1700, in the will .of on John Kipehaven. Kipehaven had taken the oath of allegiance to the English crown along with nockhoy end otha's (see above), and had been a Justice at the 'f'horekil'f between 1674 and 1685. the reference, which indicatee‘that he i‘ new nockhcy as a frieni, follows: gm. 1 give and bequeath unto Garnelius Pluckhoy the blind man Twenty Shillings.42 ., After perinpe eighty years of life Pieter Gornelis nockmy died among his own people. His death ln‘phyrloal blindness one :90?th is an lronloal culmination of a life devoted to the relief of the poor and the weak. The rule of his life, as he wrote, was the command of Grist: “if any among you would be cutest, let him be servant of all.'f“ What mst impress all who read his writings is hie sincerity. ‘fbr which snd,'f he wrote, 'fthst we nay transmit t1: world unto our postm' ity in a better condition tlnn we first round it, 1 have contributed this 44 little. " ‘13 Edwin Jaqnott 301100. immune: mg.- (mu- dolphin: Lippinoott 0)., 1901), p. 134. . “AMW- p. 1. «marinara» mmnmweaomi .r.zs. mapter V mommr'a REIGN SCHEh-ES AND IDEAS Io OONCERNING m AND SOCIETY Fleckhoy was not a utopian in the strict sense of the word. He did not wish to build impossible castles in the air, but wanted to apply his schemes to the real life problems which prompted them. 'f'l‘is no Utopiafl writes his poet friend, Steen- m, "it rests caprinciples which, for true liberty, prescribes you settled rulesflf1 Plockhoy was primarily a reformer. B wished to abolish two offences against man in the society in which he lived: disunity and intolerance in religion, and social injustice. The basis for his reform ideas in these two areas were the same: love, tolerance, and comunion as embodied in the teachings of Christ. Hie remedy for the evils in religion was the eventual establishment of a universal, undenoninational Ghristenlom. he first step in th realiztion of this goal was the separation of church and state, and consequently the aboli— ticn of the tithe and set confessicnn of faith. ‘1'!» second step was to erect in every eennmnity a general meeting house for all Christians where the Bible would be the supreme rule and mutual diecmsion the order of worship. Since men are the creations of a single God, they should behave as brothers tomrd each other. 1 M an East. 93319.n- (no pagination). 62 his concept of the universality of men is central in the reform of social problem as well, although Plockhoy gives up the notion of bringing at once all men together in communion. Now he states: Iflif we be insufferable to the World, aer they be incorrigible or unhetterable as to us, than let us reduce our friendship and so- ciety to a few in number, and maintain it in such places as are separate from otlnr mal, where we my with less impediment or hindrance, love one another and mind the Wonders of God, eating the bread we shall earn with our own hands, leaving nothing to tb body but what its nakedness, hunger, thirst, and weariness mlls for. .32 The clange in the unit of reform was partially the result of the failure to mks any progress in effecting the. ’fgenaral christian meeting-placeflf fibre particularly it was because 210ch had become greatly concerned with social as well as religious injustice in tin world. He gave up working through the government and began laboring directly with the poor classes inpsociety. men as he was petitioning the hrliamerrt of the Pro- tectorate for reform in religion he vac becoming aware of the so- cial injustice around him. His letter to hrliament of January 24, 1559, sale with the injunction: 'fGive ear‘to the poor, for the cry of them is exceeding great in these mticns. '38 In the first para- graph of g m W he writes of having become aware of the great inequality and disorder amang nan in the mrld, 'fthat not only 0. zummmwm pp- 9-10. ammmmmmmumm p- 6. 63 evil governors or rules, covetous merchants and tradesmen, lazy, idle, an! negligent teachers, and others, have brought all under slavery and thraldom; but also a great number of the common handicraftsmen or laborers, by emeavoring to decline, escape, or cast off the heavy burden, fill all things with lies and deceipt, to tin oppressing of the honest and good people, 4 whose consciences cannot bear such practicesflf His goal was ”to set up as in former times righteousness, love, ard brotherly f 5 sociablenessfif He would bring the socially downtrodden people into communion with himself and each other to better their lot in a cooperative nanner, living apart from the larger society, but remaining economically a part of it. It is interesting to note that social problem of non-members would still be a concern of the society: The principal public servants should appoint some comissiouers from the colonists who will be charged, at the expense of the society, with the care of all needy widows, orphans, the sick, the old; in short, all impotent men, women and children, especially within the society, without forgetting however to be- stow kindness upon all others who are not yet members, am this not in a stingy way, but very liberally, yea, brotherly, in order that the unfortunate will be saved from becoming degraded, t will become instead worth- while members of society. he fundamaltal ideas in his scheme for a little commonwealth were equality and association. Although these are not mutually exclusive ideas, they shall be considered separately. Association «tantrums. r- 1- sham. 6 MMMMW- r- 61. 64 is a divim state, to be patterned after the Apostolic mode of living. Man is essentially a social being, desiring communion with others; but he reaches the most perfect and blessed state when God by the dispensation of his secret counsel brings him into fellowship with others, and when he would not exchange this union or fellowship for all the riches in the world. But the more divim this state of friendship, the loss is it seen on earth. God is the only bond by which men in divine association are tied together without bring unloosed and upon which they resolve to withstand all assaults whatsoever. Nothing comes nearer the divine nature tlnn love, which among true frienis creates such an agreement that no secret, no Joy, no profit, nor any cross or affliction is uniivided, but whatsoever betides either of them is not otherwise than if it wu'e tin change of one alone, so that death itself can scarce separate souls so totally united. Christ, by his doctrine and example, instituted a society of mutual love among all members. no required all gifts and means of subsistence in the world to be common, so tint all wristmdom ought to be merely a certain great fraternity, comprising such ss have denied the world and their own lusts, who conspire together in Ghrist, the sole head ani spring of love, doing well to. one another, and distribute their goods to those wln stand in need. 'thi tint we had this perfection and were answerable to the end of our creation: certainly there would not be such going to law, such intrenching and encroaching upon the bounds of lands, such hiding and close losing up of money, nor 65 7 would there be such scraping together of superfluous Estatesflf If, therefore, God Joins mme together who endeavor after a life more regular than their former, each Inving one to whom he may comimte his secrete, a friendly reprover of his errors, a reclaims? of him from the world's allurements, a comforter in advu'sity, a moderator of Joy in prosperity, and in all respects a sharer in that which God hath liba‘ally given, and last of all one rudy for all cases and conditions that may happen, these are the happiest of all person that ever were upon the earth. Nothixg is more acceptable and lovely in the universe than her- mony and concord which has its origin from God. furs, riches, and estates'f hinder the divine association among men. They are a burden, causing men to 1111 their houses with furniture which is not useful, a Iftrouble to get them, a perplexiw to keep them, and s grief to part with them. 'fe Their clothes are so dainty and serious tint thq cannot sit down anywhere without fear of spoiling their apparel. If they have no one to behold their splendor, all is in vain; but if they have spectators, they fear sons will lurch, all othrs filch away from them their belong- ings. "than we never be able to attain this, to choose rather to lay up our estates in the hungry bellies of the poor than in a few bags? 'e shall be able to do all this if we forget not that our God is the most faithful of all debtors and the most sure of 7 awnmwm. p- 2. 8 £3». P. 4- 66 all securities. To how happy an hour are we born if we do enter upon this commnion or fellowship}? nockhoy's notion of equality‘was in reality a protest against artificial meclanisms of status in society, such as ti- tles of honor. "The world hath her delight in different degrees of dignities, states, titles, and offices, exalting themselves one above another; but Christ on the contrary will that every one shall perform his office as a member of one and the same body, in which no one exalteth himself or accounteth himself worthier than another.'flo His suspicion of teachers and preachers, as will be seen in the section to follow, concerned their demand, by virtue of their position, for pro-eminence and dominance. In contradiction to the comnand of christ who said that if any among you would be geatest, let him be servant of all, in the world they are accompted the greatest who have the most servants, and not they that do the most service to others. If people are to be measured according to the design of nature an the rule of Christ, they should not be accounted worthier than another merely because of their name. "The name of the tongue, is that any more worthy name than a; name of the finger? The name of the eye, is tint more excellent than the name of the breast? He certainly; that whereby the members are diffa'mt dam m lift in; u. not with u. the name of Lord and Gentle— man puffeth up, and what else 1. it but a mere name, tin vanity —; 9 4111.. p. 6. 10 43911.. p. 3. 67 whcecf who sees it not? Yet we delight in such trifles, and give way to than so far, that we will rather hear a lie from a notor- icns parasite or flattsrsr, if he be but on our side, than to 11 hear the truth from an honest man, if he cross our interest.'f In the ideal society which he envisioned none were to b. chosen for leadership on the basis of riches or wealth, but ra- ther for his wisdom. Plockhoy was more emphatic about this in his plan for mlonisation in America than in Mland. 'vaeryons who wishes to enter the society," he wrote, 'fmust seriously and earnestly promise that he will never try to strive for any spe- cial power, nor will allcw anyone else to make the least efforts 12 in that directiom'f There is evidence of suspicion on the part of some that he sought to abolish all differmces between men in a forced system of comnunism. ms defense of the project serves to clarify his notion of equality: Although the first article of Letter “D" poses equality as the basis of our society, we hope that nobody will be so naive, much less malevolent, as to think, inspite of our clear distinction, that we are attempting to renovs all differences between persons. This is so far from the truth that we on the contrary believe that to be as impossible as that our fingers would be the same length; for every human being, because of his mtuial characteristics and special qualities, comprising a universe in himself, will always remain different from others; wlnrefore they could correctly be consida'ed the greatest fools in tin world who try to bring my people unier one rule or strict way of life without considering what every man in particular requires for his well-being. This is wlw in the enactment of all laws for the society ‘ 11 we 1’- 4° 12 MMMMW n new I 68 the cannon welfare should be kept in mind without restricting anyone's personal ani natural liberty. But to suppress the individual by force, as is usually practised in the world, is accordirg to our opinion merely deferring the larger evil and raking it break out more violently. We want it understood then, concerning our important. foundation of equality: name- ly, that in order to establish a stable Christian civilian society, republic, or commonwealth, an equal- ity (between more and loss intelligent, more and less wealthy, male and fenele, ruler and ruled) met be contrived by reasoning and experience. Furthermore be it known that we fight against all violations of the true foundations of freedom, amongst which we consider: all domineering over manbers of the society, or exercise of force, moreover all complacent obod-“ ience, such as in the Rom (htholgs way of imposing upon us, freedom loving Dutchmen.1 Plockhoy believed that by the benevolence and patience of God it was man's opportunity, once he had tasted of the bitterness of the world's pleasure, to rid himself of his troubles by treading a path that was not crooked or rugged, but straight and smooth, approaching the truest anl highest pitch of all perfection, by participating in a society 'fwhsreof we have roads mention, which suffereth no pride, riot, exacess, uncleanness, unjusti co, or any evils which have been portrayed in their native colors; from Which society no man that professeth the name of Christ, and pre- ctiseth his doctrine, is excluded, of '11:: sect, party, or by what name soever he is called or mud? a. II. CONCERNING TEOHERS AND PBEACHERS 310ch led the highest respect for learning which is stim- hted‘by an earnest desire to know the wonders and secrets of God's 1?? me. p. 29. 14 memwm. p. 12. 69 univer so. But he had a great contempt for a certain class of learmd and religi cue men who claimed to mve discovered great truths but was void ofthe knowledge of the principles of hidden love and forbearance. ms ideas concerning teachers sill. poachers are revealed indirectly in his reform schemes. Religion bigotry, which he hoped to abolish by his fir st scbme, is nurtured by preachers of a certain faith who attempt to force their doctrines on others. They persuade people so that the people my the more willingly drudge for them, leading them to believe they take care of their souls as if they could love the soul which they canmt see, and have no compassion on the body which they see. Educational bigotry is taught by flaw, idle, and negligmt teachers'fl5 who belong to one school ‘of thought and fail to remgnise goodin other schools. Who teachers, beic Bpiritusl captains, would rather (as to m; generality} for their on profit have Iars than Peace in Christendom; and therefore tiny, mving trade an incurable rent, do set people one against another, which hates it appear that by mture the people are not at so great a distance as they now appear to be. '316 The world 1- in sugar of filling under the dominion. of on.“ particular sect or school whose ministers or teachers are 'finfecting tbir forms, not only in the public nesting places and houses of the poor or hospitals, but also the universities which have by the subtilty of them in all countries almost lost the name 'universal' by being 15 AMW- p- 1- 16M! P. 12- 70 l? misapplied to self-ends and interested? In order to reform these corrupticns the nagitratee should expel from the colleges all more humane forms of rel igion, so that teachers cease to nabs a trade and merclnandiss of the things of God. Ii'he common people, not perceiving by reason of the great respect which they have for the teachers and preachers that some of them seek only to make thanselves great, have occasiomlly attempted to hold forth tin authority of the Scriptures according to their own sense; and when the tsaclnrs have introduced mttere contrary to their reason, an! the people have refused to receive them for truth, they lave been constrained from so much as to geek or whisper aminst it. ,All true lovers of the common good will labor not only to take out of the world factions, but also all hunans in- vutions or innovations in religion. Theyw ill put no trust or affiancs in any besides Jesm Christ, nor yet receive anything as truth, but tint which they themselves can apprehend to be good and agreeable to his doctrine. Jesus, the only perfect teacher, who has been too long trod under foot by sectarians, ought to be set above all. lorldly knowledge is not so great a thing as it is eomonly «me... for as lunch as urdsr the title and disguise of being learned the very shame of being found ignorant leads, with many subtle inventions and mlicious subterfuges, to the hiding of the extent of ons's knowledge from the eyes of the cannon people. If man but brings himself to the touch or the world through travel, ‘ v 17 mmnrmmmmnmm p- 4- 71 having a free and pure mind, he shall be able to obtain knowledge for himself, excluding the eloquence and prudence of the world, mncluding that nothing is to be compared with Christ. is princes are not born to rear up stately pallaces, the learned are mt born for the writing of nany unprofitable ani frivolous books. ‘ How I would tint they that stand and admire at the fine wits of our age, anl the sublime learning of our times, did but consider with me, whetha' these things which daily please our eyes with their novelty, be indeed such for which we nay Juetly rejoice; or whether on the contrary it were not nmch better (since they are the cause of so many griefs and troubles in man's life) that we were advised by our learned men to put them away far from us? For what greater fruit of wisdom, or wrat greater glory of the new revived learnirg could there possibly be than to bring humane matters to such a posture that we may attribute our well-being and felicity in this life to them under God, that by the wholesome instruct ion thereof, that which is super- fluous might be thrown away, an! that which is unpro- fitable might be cut off, and that we might truly be distizguished from the barbarous and savage peOplss, not by Books, nor by Titles of Ibnor, nor by Universi- ties, but by such morality as Christian Philosophy doth prescribe. Let there come forth from the studies and libraries of our wise men into the light; not a continuation of prosecution of old old errors, or an heaping up of new to the old, but on the contrary, a Rule or Direction for a new and reformed life in wrist. This will danonstrate that we are professors of the best Religion and are imitators of the best life. In the maritime let them mt take it 111 that we do not cake any great account of these Sciences that are void of Grist, that u do not moire to know the; and if we lave drunk in any mob, yet we desire to unlearn them, and with singleness of heart to become as children who are altogether unequainted with voluptuousness. In this School of Christ 's we hope that neither Divine Hyster ies, nor secrets of mture, nor the contemplation of rare matters, shall be wanting to us, since he former- ly hath trade it evident by tb example of his Apostles and holy mm, how posa'ful he is in teaching, an). then especially he open his unexhaustible treasures when humanismsdom ceaeeth and the skill of the world meltsth away. 18 mmnmwm pp. 10-1. '72 In his comnity Plockhoymade no place for the clergyman. In this relation he wrote: '3...it needs to be said that we intend to found a society of people with different convictions, and find it immediately necessary to desist admission to all ministers without exception....For with the accepting of ministers of one denomination many different convictions could not approve, and to admit a minister for each sect would, besides beixg impossible for a shall, struggling society, be a ruinous pest of all pace and concord. Without concord a well organised society can nei- ther be founded nor improved, much less in any possible way be lasting. It is further difficult for us to understand the pe- culiar benefit which in any way could be derived fmm a minister for such a sociew. Is are well equipped with the best and least costly of ministers, the Holy Scriptures. '39 But it u an expression of his respect for knowledge that he nude progressive provisions for schools in his society. he meters of arts and sciences comprise one of the four classes of citisens in the society. We consider it very necessary for the special benefit that therebe founded abundant or sufficient schools in the language of the society, for older people as well as for the young, where everything will be taught and determimd in th most clear and certain way, by indubitabls reasing, derived from certain infallible principles. li'he experience to be gained from histories, etc. , would be not less valuable for olde- people w 19 mum elmmmm p. 28. 73 tlnn for the young. learning of nathenat ice and the dependent sciences would be of especial utility in our sociew. It is to he wished that medical science would be put on a much nore solid foundation in order to be more safely practised on women and children, and even by women. ".20 The schoolhouse in Plockhcyls colony was to be located in the muntry‘. Rich and poor would be taught alike, and those witrnut the society desiring to send their childrai there were invited to do so. Girls as well as boys were to attend school three hours daily, and for another three hours learn some trade or vocation. School was to be held six days a week, except aunday. The children were not to be taught ary humne forms of religion, hit only tl'n writings of the saints, and natural arts, sciences, and languages, tlnt their understandings, before they have the use of reason, be not spoiled. On the contrary it is to be imprinted in than that they ought not in spiritual matters to believe any but those that Inve the spirit of God, doing miracles as the prophets and apostles, for the faith ought not to depend upon men's words, but upon the power of the wonderful works of God. So doingjthere will be no foundation for sects, factions, or schisms laid in their hearts. "Our children without doubt, will be of differing opinions, and yet no reason, when theyfido not hinder the common welfare, to exclude than from the Society. It ought to he considered tint nnst differences (dwelling together) . 21 by time, and liberty of‘ speaking, will cease to be.'f A. 20 M09 P0 29- 21.4.th r- 12- 74 III. CONCERNING GOVERNORS AND GOWT Floclmoy describes his philosophy of government and espe- cially his conception of the ideal governor in his letters to Oliver Gromell and the Commonwealth hrliament. And the 1.523. 17313393; contains his own provisions in outline for the ideal government for a snail comonwealth. _ He bases his notions of government upon the Bible. The power to defend the good against the evil, he argued, is ordained of God, according to Banana 13. The power to punish evil doors is ordained of God in all lands, without respect of religion; and whosoever opposeth that power, opposeth the ordinances of God; not that all officers (though they rule 111) are of God, or are his ministers, but those only who gaminister their office rightly, according to God's will. Warmers, in conformance to the cormnnd of Christ to give to (hesar the things that are Gsesar'e, fwe are to pay taxes and tributes to the magistrates, being in‘subJect under all human ordinances which are not contrary to the will of Goddfzs Hock- hey, diverging from Mennonite tenets, approved the use of the 'fsword'f in government 'ffor the protection of the good,'f and especially for the abolition of arbitrariness in the form of a state-church system or other forum of compulsion in religion, speech, or thought. But he hoped that after the abusers had lost their power, "the sword may return into its right place for which , 84 God has ordained it.'f ammnmmmmumwu - p- 24. “dream. p. 9. unanimimmmmmnmeem n. p.18. '75 From this point Plockhoy begins to define the obligations md limits of good governmt. If the power (to defend the good against the evil) in all Countries be ordained of God, mpg, then reason requires that all sorts cf people of what lhtions soever, being in one Country together, should be pro- tected as well as if any of them severally was in his own: which cannot be except there be a good publish- minded and godly Magistrate, that will suffer all sorts of people in any one Country, as God suffers the same in all Countries of the world; which I expect first in , and so from thence to breat forth (as a light) to all other Countries and mtions, as having long nough walked (3% in the night) by the glimpse of par- timilar ling. . flockhoy spoke continuously of a 'funivm‘sal nagistrate in Christ- aeaomdf God had destined thland, not for a psi-nouns, but for a general work. If his scheme was put into operation, he saw the possibility of people of many rations moving to England, where the government would keep its lands out of religion and would be interested solely in protecting the people. 'fAll mandamus-sting the report of this noble heedom‘will be- gin to trouble, yea, even their silenced children whose mouths have been mauled by compulsive restraint, will begin to speak; am so in time of need, seeing your free Government, may come 26 to shroud themselves under your wings.’ Government should mediate between parties and factions all conflicting opinions in the maintenance of peace and harmony. If a person wishes to be a member of a particular congregation, he has that liberty, the same as others, and my honour the same 25 me. p. 5. 86 3111., p. 15. 76 with his presence, with his tongue, with his pen, and with his money: mmwmwnwnmw- Gover- nors should be armed with a "divine foresightfulness and circum- specticnflf l'hq are chosen by all the people and should stand imcvable‘in the center, as moderators, between all sects. Ihey are in regard to their office as treasurers who are entrusted with a sum of money to employ, not for their own or anyone 's private advantage, but for the benefit of all who have entrusted the sun to them. If it were the magistrates' work to set up a national religion acmrding to their own will, then the arid mun. be in danger of having as many religions as there be several ways of government in the world; and the magistrates, changing their opinion, the whole national religion must also as often be changed. It is better and belongs especially to the office of magistrate, not to follow the traditions of men, but to disannul such as are destructive and without mcy or are contrary to the law of nature and the revealed will of God. It is also the magistrates' duty to diligently consider what properly belongs to his office before he makes use of his sword. It belongs only to God and Grist to have dominion over consciences, and to the magistrates to prevent any from exercising lordship over he consciences of others. In so doing they would be true nain- tainers and defenders of liberty, when they use not their power saint those who asset their own views, but against those who would camel others to be of their Opinions. lbr this, that is to deal equally in matte's of religionwith all subjects, is not only 77 good and pious, but it is also the foundation of good government. If tiny would rennin without usurping their office, magistrates would not make laws in setters of religion, but only against evil deeds to Irotect the good, to the cal that their subjects, from whom they receive taxes and impositions, may be protected in peace, of what religion soever they are. They should not mingle policy and religion, which were ordained for several ends, the one to defend the good men against the evil, and the other to make the evil good. There remains only that the hhgistrates (for an ex- culple to their Subjects) do mill all humans comranding and constraining laws in spiritual matters, M so Ill . murmur: 1' ___hathaoin_..__dlante . max at 1' nmwnMMmeMoh will best take effect when the dominion of the Teachers is, though the power of the Governors, come to an end; an! their hape of domineering over others out off. m we 1'3 mumnme Mm. ought on the contrary to Made; a}; hrdship over We tint complaining and murmuring my cone to an end, arri that the righteous may rejoice.” (Flockhoy's italics) Piockhoy warned tie magistrates of the words of Solomon "where he speaks to the kings and rulers of the earth that a sharp Judg- mat shall come upon them that are in high places; for mercy will soon pardon the meanest, but mighty mm, not standing in the council of God, shall be mightily tormentedeg8 His seconi letta.‘ to Gromell concluded 1th a prayer: . O Lord of all lords and nagistrates, teach them that rule as gods in the world to consider that they are but men in Tm eyes; that they any handle their subjects after such a manner as they wish to be handled by Thee in Judgment}?9 27 19“., pp. 25—5. 29 lug” p. 2. 29 m1” 1). 27. 78 For his own little commomvealth Plockhoy desired democratic self-governmmt (see below). Pblicy was to be determined by all the members. Laws were to be instituted by common consent an! amenable always to discussion and amendment. Our rules and laws being few, are to be only for necessity, not to take away anyom's liberty, leaving than always open to the trial of all rational men, that so self-seeking (to be more or above others in nature or spiritual matters) may be discovered and excluded. Government for his settlement in America became somewhat more ela- borate, although still limited in scope: Concerning government: in order not to be destroyed or smothered by imposing military disciplinarians be- fore really laving begun..., and also in order to attain a divine progress and growth for the common benefit and satisfaction of every settler, they have not been able to contrive anything better...than a civil government with equal voting power, subordinated to the Highest Magistrates, or your LA. , and consequently limited, as set forth in their last and "Still Rather Ramon— strance," egg in the three previous writings, now unier correction. Plouhoy's articles of government will be outlinelmore in detail in a section to follow. IVs FOR THE ESTABLISHIVENT OF A. UNIVERSAL CHRISTENDOM The purpose of Plockhoy's first reform project in England was 'ftc raise up an universal Magistrate in Christendom that will suffer all sorts of people, of what Religion soever they are in any one Country as God, the great Magistrate, suffers the same in 30 _A_ Way W. This paragraph was not in the edition "printed for the author,'f but was in the 'fGiles culvert? edit ions. 31 m Egrhael van Nigm Eederlants.’ p. 66. 79 32 all Countries of the world.'f Thus he believed that inasmuch as God's Kingdom was universal, i.e., it was applicable to all men, the church and all mistian activities on earth should be tem- pered by a simlemss of p'ccedure and purpose. It wasn't nece- ssary tint men accept a common interpretation of the Scriptures. 0n the contrary a difference of opinion was to be expected; and for that very reason a state-church, which would impose one interpretation and one creed, sinuld be abolished. It was impera- tive, however, that men attempt to resolve their differences of Opinion, not by force or compulsion, but by a free exchange of ideas, fthat the weakness or ignorance of some say be remedied by the hnowledge of others)?” If differences could not be re- solved in this manner, tolerance of the divergent opinion was necessary. ”lie met allow that liberty of speaking to others which we desire ourselves, without tying anyone to our opinion ...without stumbling at any differences which do not hinder love and piety.'fu Flockhoy's idea of tolerance is the significant part of hi; plan. It does not imply an acquiescience to ignorance nor surrender to force. It is simply to insure peaceful relations between nun in their search for truth. ncckhoy is alter nately filled with hope and fear, hope for the good influence his ideas would lave and fear that the servants of the state will be pre- maturely ensnared by the agents of state-churchism. flamnmmmmnmmi title-pass. rem” p. 22. " Mamma- p- 12. ‘ ‘ . . - _ e , . I , . . \ _ 7 ‘ ._ . ,. . .- . . , . n ,l , . ‘ v . - 5. . .. e . - . ~ I - v \ ~ - M - A . . e . .4 ‘ s t . - w s ' ' f A ' . a ' » . , . c . I , . ‘ I . . , ,.‘ . . , s - - I . e , ‘ a . , . n . . . e v a .. p . . . . . . . - -¢ — -. . . - . — . - - - . . . . , e e I have with much cheerfulness beheld the great freedom which this Nation (since the putting down the authority of Bishops) doth enjoy, which I hope by degrees will more prevail in the world to the ta- king away of all force upon Consciences that men my be led and governed by reason, as men and not as beasts by compulsive power. It is most necessary that tin Emmple of wrist (to reconcile all into one) should be followed: for those that force the Conscience, being not able to bring all under them by worldly power, do commonly manifest their own in- clination to be void of Christian love and forebear- ance by gathering into Sects and Schisms so tlat besides the great Antichrist, there erg nary little Antichrists that enieavour to rise up. 5 By the appellation "Antichrist? Piockhoy alludes to the Bomish starch, and by 'flittle Lntichrists" reference is nade to the contemporary Protestant state churches, particularly tin Lutheran and mvinist. 'fKings and Princes, who being separated from rope-y, have moo themselves unworthy of the blessing of strict by giving honor to the bare name of Luther, Galvin, and others, 35 - instead of giving it to Garistflj Plockhoy‘s religious program was both negative and positive. It is negative in flat Gromell was to avoid the evils of the state-church system of government. nockhoy writes: Let some course be tahsn that all persons may buy their estates free from Tithes, that thereby henceforth none in all your Dominions may be forced to pay Tithes to tin Ministers, .for that hath been and is still the chief cause of persecution and discontent in these and otter Eaticns. Buffer by no means (you having respect to the Honor of airist) that any Confession of hith be set upon the Throne as equal with the holy Scripture; for Confeseicns are only to distinguish one Sect from another.37 sommnammmmnennnmnnm. pp. 6-7. as my... p. 20. " 37 311., pp. 2-3. 81 on tin positive side, he wrote: "Even though Christendom is divided into divers Beets, a general way of Grouch-meeting should. be imtituted for the tearing of God's word read unal- tered and unsophisticated, leaving freedom for all Seats, as well the one as the other, to assert their own apprehensions and understandings upon the Lessons of their meta Gin-int, without being tied to one anotha's opinions.'f$8 Me was to be in every eommity one general christian assembling place where all would come together for spiritual meditation and an exclange of views concerning Biblical doctrine. This essenbling place was to be arranged ”in such a form tint all people may see one another round-aboutby the help of seats, rising by steps, hav- ing before them convenient leaning-places to read and write upon; also one desk aloft on one side or end to hear the holy Scrip- tures read at a set time, giving freedom after the reading to all people orderly to confer together concerning the Doctrine and Instruction of their Lord an Easter wrist. ’39 his pro- gram was not to replace individual church activities, for 'feven as the Jews, being divided into several Secte (as W, m, m and m, to.) met togetherdn one Eemple, so we would not deny aw particular Gangregat ions ef their freedcu of peaceable meeting among themselves about the Ordi- mnces of Jesus Qirist (as the orders or synagogues of the Jews were not at all infringed) nor bereave the ministers or teachers 59 M. P- 8. 39 Me, Ppe 12-13e 82 of their benefit which they do receive of their own people for their maintenance, for they, having a fit opportunity, may the better bring in their sense with others into this general crunch-meeting; that so the truth getting enlargement, the bad (tint annot eniure the light) may be discovered and made 40 known." In elaboration of his program Plockhoy described the place or the magistrate in the meeting—place. It muld be necessary 'fthat the Authority of the magistrate interpose in this gmeral assenbly or meeting-place tint everyom may speak in their order, may after due warning be ejected till tiny are better disposed without oppressing them by imprisonment or 41 othcwiseflf mus it is observed that although the government was not to dictate the religious faith a man subscribes to, it had a function in the new arrangement. has result of the plan was envisioned as follows: Hence when understandings might be so free and uninterrupted, there would not only arise a clearing of the unlerstanding and reforming of the lives of people; but also a yielding, submissive, condescend- ing love: for the wisest ard expertest men daily coming thus together to teach and to be taught, it would incline the hearts is those that should behold the: one towards anothc'. \ It ms to be hoped tint if G‘omell initiated this sort of a program, other nations of the world, especially those with a state-chuch system, would follow suit. It is to be an example to 'fEllad, Denmark, awedm, France, and other Kingdoms, who seeing there is no force nor constraint used, will easily be 43 brought to a firm bond of Unity.'f Even those tint elanier .. “Megpe 130 41M, p. 22. 43 “13?, pe 14s 43 M, De 20s 83 Oronwell for having no religion may perceive that he does only maintain the Christian religion ”taking away that shameful reproach that the Magistrates and Ministers in England have brought down the King and Bishops rather to succeed in their places than to bring the people to peace and happiness)?“ noahoy's manner of meeting in common assemblies inwhich the reading or the Scriptures received a central emphasis was characteristic of the Gollegiants, as was seen in Oinpter II. It was, in fact, from such We, that the unvenent received its nan. ~V. FOB rm mmsussmr OF rm IDEAL comm! fhs totality of techniques which a group _of people employs ' in adapting themselves to tin enviroment is known as their technology.“5 technologies vary according to the special comb- inations of principles utilised. The relative complexity of a technology is meanred by the degree of specialination, or division of labor, and by the efficiency with which the people mes surplus and intract in concert. 21111191 91 m 210ch sought to 'fbring together a fit, suitable, and well qualified people into one household goverment or little commonwealth, wherein everyone may keep his property and be employed 1:6 some work or other as he shall be fit without being oppressedflf The four general classes of maubers of the ‘4 M00 9- 5- 46 Eliot Dismore (napple and Oarleton stovens Goon, Hingiplgl at. Ma. (New Iorr: Henry am and co., 194;), p. 243. 45 .4. lat mu- title-pass. 84 community were (1) husbandmen, (2) handicraftsmen, (5) mriners, and (4:) meters of arts and sciences. The society would not probably begin immediately with all four classes. 30 that it would. realise an early profit, the first members should be un- married persons and craftsmm whose products have an immediate and constant demand, such as weaver s, tailors, and shoemakers. There muld be an mrly need for tradesmen to sell the pochcts, although the craftsmen might act as tradesmen in turn selling their own products. Thai could be enlisted members from the other occupations. After trade commenced there mold be a greater need for staples, and 'fhere now will be use for sheep and kine,not only .. 47 for their milk and flesh, but also for thir wool and skins, doc}: This development in the evolution of the society would create a ‘ need for husbandmen ’ffor the breeding up of cattle, poultry, do” and especially for tilling the ground for corn, flax, hemp, &c., &c., also gardiners having skill in gardening, for roots, plants, at! orclnrds, for fruit, flours, and herbs, as well medicinal (for our physicians) as others. f“ This statement denotes the growth of complexity in the wholeAscheme and the interrelation of the working classes. Ehe husbandnnn not only provides a source of food but also staples for the craftsmen and medicines for the phy- sicians. ’ For the building of the huge houses the society would need bricklayer s, carpenters, and smiths, who after completion or the houses would build ships 'fnot only wherein to fetch and carry -d e7 mg, p. 4. ca mflm 85 goods to and from the city, but also to catch fish for the society. 949 The work of tin carpmters subsequently creates a need for mariners, with whom the society has all things in common while they are in "Flanders, Elland, fiance and other places'fso as well as when they are at home. The first of the masters of arts and sciences would begin by keeping books, unk- ing schedules, serving as navigators, and the like. later they would serve their more important function as teachers of "Latin, Greek, Hebrew and other languages, as also physics, music, one - other useiul things referring all to a good and spiritual end.251 Plockhoy listed the types of craftsmen the community would need,rseventy-two in the first edition of A MW, an! seventy-seven in the second. These lists, however, were not to be considered complete. To illustrate the degree of specializa- tion among the occupations he distinguished between mrpenters and ship-carpenters, brickmakers and bricklayers, browns and distillers, glassnaker s, looking-glassware”, and spectacle-makes, printers and bookbindere, pinmakers and needlemakers. In each class of workers there would be a need for foreman, to be chosen by lot from smug the experienced. They were to work the same number of hours as the others. No one was t) have superiority in status, only in role, and then for a limited period of time. Home: were to be employed in 'fhousewifa'yflf Children, girls and boys alike, were ‘ 4? hie-nu.- 50 Email 61 Malt. 86 to be in school for three hours daily and for another three hours learn several trades. Besides the basic sciences, boys were to learn ciphering and keeping books of accompts, and girls were to receive instruction in housewifery. Children were further to wait upon their elders at the dining table. W M W In general the essence of the schene was to pool all skill and experience in a cooperative enterprise for mutual benefit and happiness. Although it was communistic in the fields of consumption and production, it was primarily a socialistic system in that it was Joint-etc ckism based, on trade with and profit from tin greater mciety. Iro- perty was 321 to be conmunal, in accordance with the fi'enth enhancements which states explicity that none ought to covet another's goods. The community was to be started by investments of money, land, and stock by interested individuals who would then act as "fathers? of the society. Wintever anyone Ind contributed to the compaxw in tin way of land, money, or movable goods was put to his credit, hit. was to receive no interest. There are remrmble pmvisions in was of death or withdrawal from the society. If a member decides to leave, he may lave his property returned with a third of the accrued profit. If a young man or woman leaves the society to become narried he shall receive some of the accumulated profit of the household. 11' there happens to be no profit, the timbre will give him gifts. If the society is“ dissolved, all creditors are first to be satisfied and the reminirg land and 87 money divided "among the poor only who have brought nothing to the society, ercept there be poor kindred of those that (out of love) have given to the stock, inch shall have an equal propor- tion’with the others. ’52 The writing continues to describe the techniques in detail, .including such matters as hours of labor, buildings, personal quarters for families, storehouses, manage- sent, trade, fimnce, schools, and religious activities. It deliberately aimed at the combination of agriculture and industry, with more upmsis, perhaps, on the latte. Concerning producticn, six hours a day shall be the rule for all members of the society, either three hours in the morning and three in the afternoon, or (which nany might prefer, especially in the hot sinner) six hours in the morning, Sundays always excepted in this as in other cases. he hours of work would ordinarily be from 9 s.m. until noon and from 3 p.m. until 6 p.m. The rest of the time is to be used "for the refreshiig of their bodies and p'cfitable exercises of the m:lnd.‘f£53 Non-manbers who work for the society for wages, but are not qualified for membership. are to work twelve hours daily, from 6 am. until noon, and from 2 p.m. until 8 p.m. The location of the society is neither urban nor rural, but a combination of both. With the accumulated stock two large houses are to be built, 'fone in (or about the) city, ELI.- a ware- house for merchants or tradesmel, another in the country near a 52 M09 P- 30 55 Mrs P0 20 88 river for the husbandmen, handicraftsmetn, schoolmsters, and mariners}54 The urban dwelling is to be prinnrily a sales building, which might best be described as a sort or department store. It is to be large enough to accommodate twenty to thirty families and places for shops and professional services. It is- to be "the foundation of the whole work, not only by reason of the profit that comes by trading, but also because the landi- crafts, belonging thereto, depend thereon. ".55 The department store will not suffer from competition and “will be profitable and expand for three reasons: increasing sales due to low prices, low overhead, and good corals on the part of the workers. The morale will be high because the profit is used for the cannon good. Furthermore, the nargin of profit will be greater because of production on a large scale. The chief men in the city will be tradesmm; but with the tradesnen there will also be some physicians, harbors, and apothscaries. The barbers and physi- cians, will serve the rich for money and the poor gratis, some going abroad to visit patients, and other: staying at home to serve the people that cone to them. It is to be hoped that this mtan will increase the volume of trade, for it will advertise that ‘ws sell all things at a reasonable rate without deceiving any. '2“ T1! city house should also have some women and children Wm keep everything in order and ready-undo, and to act as sales 5‘ Iblge’ p. as 55 Lea-sis.- 56 an." 9. 4. 89 clerks. IJ.'he country house is to be the center of production and the common residence of the association. It is to be situated along a river with a quay to accamnndate the ships. Aroum the house a most and drawbridge will protect from thieves and robbers. The drawbridge is to be situated in such a way that "fish may come out of the river into our water and not go out again. ’57 In the house itself tlnre are to be private and public rooms; 'fa chamber and closet for every man and his wife, a great hall to lay every- thirg in order, a place to dress victuals, another to eat to- gether, a third for the children, also cellars to keep meat and drink in, a place for the sick, one for the physicians and chir- urgeons, furniture and medicines, one other for all kinds of useful (as well as spiritual) books, maps, and other instruments belonging to liberal arts and sciences, several places for scho- lars, a place for strangers, &c. , who intending to stay any long time, shall do some ark, or pay for their lodging and diet.'f58 In tin actual domestic arrangements Jo int management ' would‘be advantageous in every respect. "as women in our society, ,_ whm all things are done orderly, shall have no more business to trouble their leads with than one wonan in her own private fam— i.ly.'f59 Besides lightening the work, it will be very profitable to employ collective housekeeping. If a hundred mmilies live 57 £2.19.“ P° 5' 53 1523.51.10 59 M09 P0 7- 90 togethr twenty-five women can do the work which otherwise a hundred would have to do; the other seventy-five could do pm- dnctive work, which many of them would prefer. And even in other respects economy could be effected. Instead of a hundred fires, perhaps four or five "great fires'f only would be re- quired, one in the kitchen, one in tle children's room, etc. Everyone shall set together 'fsitting at the table in order (as Joseph's brethren) the womenoner against the men, young men next their Fitters, and maids next their mothers, the young people waiting by turns at the table, that so no one may be respected above the other, neither will it be needful (being assured of one snothas love) to use the ceremonies of putting off the hat, or common drinking to one another, yet not to hinder any nan from showing his hearty love to a stranger or otha'wissflfeo Ploahoy combines good business principles and practices with his social concerns. Every six or twelve months an inven- tory is to be taken and *fwlat is overplus above necessity"- will be given to where of the society "so that everyone nay lave filerwitInl to give in tin poor or to please his friend. f6]. A manner of features are designed to attract the bourgeois‘elements of society. Tb children of rich people not in the society are invited to come to the household schools. The training of the children of the rich people will be a point of contact and attract 50 mm- 61 311., p. 6. 91 the parents "to buy wares of us.’f In the city department store sane person will necessarily need to decorate and trim garments in the styles of the day. hover customers desiring such elaborate clothing wi 11 bring the 'funnecessary trimings’f to the store as they will mt be for sale there. Manners of the society will wear no trimmings on their clothing so that in time fvain—gloriow men? may be convinced of their folly. In the society apparel is to ‘fbe fitted for the body and convenient for the work without beingotied to fashion, color, or stuff, only the unnecessary trimmings to be forborn, that God's crea- tures, which he hath made, be not misused}:62 If anyone wears finer clothing it shall be a aim to the poor that "he hath ability above others to relieve thanflés This ascetic doctrine should in no way, however, repel customers. If, for instmce, a purchaser desired to have articles of clothing trimmed orna- mmtally, they ought not to offend him by pointim out that finay is sinful. Plockhoy adds humorously that it is certainly a great pity tint Adam ate of the tree of knowledge, but we should never be able to cure men of their love of finery except by example. For this reason the refusal to make finery would be impolitic, tint if the young people brought up in the associa- tion should suddenly have to seek mrk, they would have much less clance of finding it if they did not know low to make finery. The government of the society is to be democratic: 63 Mrs P. 8' 63 locali- 92 A can about 40 years of age shall be chosen chief governor of the whole society, everyone giving his voice for him, tint he Judgeth to 'be fit....lIone is to rule lorger than one [unless reelected least he domineer in his office, and others, seek ng his fa- vor, play the hypocrites....This nan having governed one year, a new choice shall be made, with liberty to choose him again tint last governed, as well as anybody else, by this means In that bath a mind to (but inns in the gwernment will have an inducement to rule well. Hero none is to be chosen for his riches or wealth, as we see come to pass in the world (to the ruin of almmt of all commonwealths), but for his wisdom. lien and women having the oversight of meat, drink, and other things, shall govern by turns, and in some case some would rather keep to their ordimry work, they shall he passed by, and others put in their stead.6 Three of the men ”uppermost in the government'f will lnve the keys to the cash box or treasury, which will be locked with three locks. Thus all three men must be present when the chat is opened. 'fA times-fold cord doth not. easily break, saith Bolo— mon. ’65 ._ format will not suffer from the oppression of employers by performing heavy labor and receiving low wages, but instead ’fthe @in of the tradesmen will redound to the benefit and refreshment of the workmen. :6 Thee will be no need for insurance for all liabilities will be assured by the society. iradesnen will not need to worry about risks and losses ”for the loss tint is In!- 67 fared lieth upon none in particular} There is no need to make WV—W v—v 54 M” p. 5'. .5 mm. 66 inn-en 57 M” p. e. 93 provisicns for old age 'ffor the aged will be better looked after then the young, the sick ties the healthful, and the children 68 after the death of their parents than before.'f If any fall sick he will not only have good services from a physician but will be “freed from all worldly incimbrances'f pertainirg to the well- being of his family. Widows will be cared for along with their children. "Those among us that desire to narry will not so easily (having seen on anothers conversation) be (bceived, as 69 , tiny are now in the world.'f Young people need not get harried prematurely, as was but too frequently done, simply in order to avoid slavish dependence on the parents. They might choose their partners for their life with deliteration and with full liberty, as they need not narry menbers. Thus, the society will be con- ducive to good family life. In his plan for the community, as in tint for a universal Christendam, Plockhoy advocates tin elimination of all denomina- tional differences in religious activities. For in spiritual things, . acknowledge none but Christ for head and taster; who of old hath appointed in his church prOphets, evangelists, pastors, and teaches, these loving through the spirit of God (which led them into all truth) brought forth (and left behinl them) the writings of the How Testament, we own for ambassadors, and their words (without any interpretations of men) for our rule and plus-net, keeping in renenhrance when we meet togetha', tint we must allow tint liberty of speak- ing to oths's which we gesire ourselves without tyizg anyone to our opinions. 0 A meeting place with seats in amphitheater form, like in his pro- 531214;.» 10° 59m... 11. 70.315999 12- 94 vious plan for column religious assembling places in every commity, is to be a part of the structure of the society. As stated in Chapter IV Plockhoy's plan for a settlement in New lietherland followed his London plan in essence and out- line. Some of the differences were necessitated by the new location. The settlement in the New World could not rely as much on trade with the outside world. Agriculture was to be- cane the predominant interest, to ensure almost complete self- sufficienq. land and. livestoct: was to be owned in common for s. period of time only, after which they were to be divided among the members, thereby providing a greater personal initia- tive to work hard at the beginning. A greater opportunity was given to adventurers who wished not to emigrate but to invest in the enterprise. Goverment a: tin society became more impor- tant inasmuch as the cmtral government was more remote and Ind less Jurisdiction over them. Since the Dutch West India Company was a slave-trading corporation an). nockhoy's ideas of equality conflicted with the slave principle, an innovation forbidding slavery in the society was made. The New World further necessi- tated a greater preparation for self-defense than heretofore, especially because of the threat of the Indians. Part of the members of the society should be on guard at all times in readi- ness to defend the colozw. Since the Mennonites, who formd part of the membership, were nonresistaut in principle, they were to be mt from protective service by paying a tax: those who have conscientious objections agaimt the use of arms will be emempt from protective service by paying an annual tax to that part of the society which 95 protects it, and whose task it is not only to appoint officers, but also (besides the daily exercises and 71 drills) to pmvide amenities and other necessities. Provision was made for persons remaining at home but who wished to participate in the profits of the colony to invest a sum of money, for which they were to receive 'fa stare in the cattle that is bred, and all other profits which will result 2 from the common labor during the mentioned [first five] years. '37 Since the masters do not wish to laws slavery in the settle- rent, everyone will lave to mark lard in order that the society my show good progress; but if anybody, because of inattertiveness or injustice, tlanmeseing the common laws or rules, rakes himself inacceptable, he will, after being talked to in a friendly way and being warned several times by the supervisors and others, be expelled from the society by a two-thirds majority of the votes. E will receive his share in the profits which was realized during his time, after his share in the loan from the Amsterdam Burgouasters is subtracted. Members may sell their shares in the common land as well as the undivided cattle and all that belongs to the community, or if they wish, to retain their shares in the common interest and provide someone to work in their stead, if tin latter is acceptable to the society. If anyone desires to leave before the borrowed money is repaid to the magistrates and return to fialland, he shall always be free to do so, and he and his family shall be transported at the expense of the society, provided he 71 mm klagr m. (no pagination) 72 lids-9.1L “ 95 leaves to the society his share of the undivided land, cattle, and everything else which belongs to the community, taking with him only his personal property, so that the renaining mmhers will not be hindered in the repaying or the borrowed funds to tin magistrates of the city of Amsterdam. If anyone desires to move or travel elsewhere on his own expense, to leave the so- ciety permanently, he shall be free to do so provided he has repaid his part of the borrowed money and disposed of his share in the column land. Or if he wishes to remain a participant, he may provide a substitute for himself. When this is done, everyone is free to live wherever he wishes. is e. malification for the exercise of political rights each member of the community was to take the oath (or affirmation in the case of the non-swearing Mennonites) of allegiance and regis- ter his name, age, residence, children, occupation, and religious persuasion. Although it was declared tint the society was t) be composed of per sons of different creeds, they were to be Christ- ians. fill eccentric persons such as obstinate papists which are strongly attached to the Ronan chair, parasitic Jews, Anglican headstrong Quakers and Puritans, and rash and stupid believers in the millenium, besides all obstizate present-day pretenders to revelation, will lave t) be carefully averted from this Christian civi lien moiety?” The laws and regulations were to be concurred in by at least two-thirds of the members, who should vote by ballot. The same number of votes was to be required for the 78 £113. Vghael E9. £1911 Nggerlagtg. p. 52. 97 changing or annulling of such laws; and to avoid all clance of rashness, no such alteration could be proposed nor new laws offered unless previcnsly submitted to the officers of the association and such as had been already in authority. Before any emctment could be legally in force it was, moreover, to be approved by the representatives of fine city of Amterdam. To constitute a meeting for the election of town officers, one hunired members were required to be present. huh of these we to write on a ballot the name of the person he considered best qualified for office. The names of the ten having the highest mimbw of lites was to be then sent to the Burgomasters of Amterdam to select five from the list who were to continue in power for one year. But if it sinuld happen that more than ten had a majority of the votes those who had the least were to draw lots to decide who so name were to be forwarded. In like manner those who were akin by blood were to draw lots to determine which should be dropped, since by the Dutch law no turo relatives could sit on the same bench. Should the colony increase an additional town officer was to be allowed for way twenty families. After the first election this nomination was to be held a year in advance, to allcw tine for the names to be sent to and returned from Elland, in season for the officers elect to enter on the performance of their dutiem lb magistrate was to be reeligible until after an interval of one year from the expiration of his term of service. The oldest member see in preside over the court at first, after 98 which the longest in office. The elected mgistrates were to be clothed with the general superintendence of file affairs of the colony, and the settlers were, for five years after their arrival, to labor and live in common. They would work in groups of ten men each under supervisioll of a skilled foreman, working six hours daily on an assigned section of land. The remainirg time shall be left to each individual for his private affairs and welfare, for which plrpose each perem might lave a separate piece of land for a vineyard, garden, or playground. After the term of five years the land and stock were to be divided, and each was to receive his proportionate stars to provide for the support of his family. Should he afterwards, however, prove dissolute or idle, and fail to maintain those depeirlent upon him, he was to become subject to expulsion by a vote of two-thirds of his fellow members, and the court was to assume the care of his wife and ohildr en. In criminal prosecutions carrying with them capital punishment the proceedings were to be assumed by the hitch government in New Motherland; but in cases of a less grave character and civil suits below a certain amount, as well as all differences 'fbetween men and women, parents and children, servants and masters, ‘man and maid servantsflvn were to be summarily dis- posed of by the. town magistrates. llhoeverrefused to abide by the decision was to be fined in the first instance. In case of continued contumacy he was to be deprived of his vote; and for a third offense, expelled. In civil actions beyond a fixed 74 2311-. Do 59- 99 amount on appeal was to be allowed to a court of revision on payment of a certain mm. This court was to be composed of the mgistrates to had already been in office, of double the number of those actually on the bench. In case these could not be obtained, then it should comprise 27 persons taken from the general body of settlers, who were to decide the question at issue by a majority of votes. ‘ It sas a close approach to a Jury, and decision was to be final. The laws regulating succession, narriage, the rights of property and personal liberty, were to be thus in force in Holland, especially in the city of Anter- dsm; but for the performance of their duties the magistrates were not be receive compensation, 'fnot even a stiver.'f If they did not act for the sake of honor, they were to do so for the love of their fellowmen. Provision was made for the encouragemnt of marriage among the ”younger portions of the society, for the comfort of the sick, and support of orphans and paupers. ncckhoy's proposals for the establishment of his little comowealth reveal remarkable economic insight and business acumen. Be senses the close relationship between religious and economic factors in undertaking such an experiment. As a native of Iblland, coming from a predominantly city culture, he discerned the organic connection between agriculture and irriustry supple- mented by commerce. For the social well—being of man his combina- tion of urban and rural living is althost ideal. E avoided ex- treme isolation, ctherwcrldliness, and asceticism which character- ised so many socialistic experiments of his time. The diatribes against organised religion in his writings are easily understood 100 as part of his Collegiant background. His society has a dual purpose: an economic one and a religious one. The poor are to be helped and a Christian fellowship across denominational lines is to be created. 'fms ideas must be considered as flickerings 75 of the modern lights of cooperation and socialism". ‘§ 75 Irvin Ibrst, "Pieter Garneliss Plockhoy: An Apostle of the collegiantl." Mennonite WMHIII (July 1949). p. 178. ,. Chapter VI CIRCULATION OF res IDEAS Between 1700 and the middle of the 20th century Plcckhoy'e ideas for the reform of society had received little attention. But the writings which he left behind seemingly had wide cir- culation during the closing decades of the 17th century. Both writings went through several editions, the second probably more. than the firet. Their influence are found in the publications of he individmls-wcne in Ragland and one in Holland. In 1695 John Bellers, from whom Robert 0... admittedly ob- tsined many or his ideas and who was acclaimed by nu m: as 1 “a veritable phenomenon in the history of political scenery,” . publified his most important work, W for, Ms M 9.1 m .91. all useful m a w ELLE £91.11 In: males. mmmmm 2993.. and eased shaman mm In it he sugested tin capitalistic organisation by private undertaken of groups of five hundred laborers each into cooperative units, which should engage in large-scale enterprise, develop production by cheapening fo od, eliminate waste, and so make a ten per cent or more profit to the holders of shares. 7m merit: wrote Robert Owen, 'fdue fer the discovery calculated to effectmore substantial and‘peruanmt benefit to mankind than ever w—v—v v v 1 Quoted in, Erhard Bernstein, m; an m: W mwmmmmm Lonchm George Allen & 0min Ltd., 1930), p. 266. -- 102 yet contemplated by the human mind belongs exclusively to John Bellersfifa But as a later writer has suggested, 'waen post-dated the origination of collectivismflfa Most of Bellers' ideas were mnifeet in essentially the same‘form a generation earlier in I'lcckhoy'e, _A_ Ea; managed. Lite neckhoy, Bellers aimed at the establishmnt of a working association with Joint house- keeping and coordination of tin varials branches of production and employment, and wherein the members would keep their own poperty. He called his prospective moiety, not a workhouse, which sounded too much like a 'fBridewell'f or a community, which sumssted commlnism, but a college, which indi ated voluntary membership. It was a combinst ion of industry and agriculture. Hare place was given to imestments in the college for profit by rich non-members, but no surplus was to be declared until the requir emalts of the workers have been taken care of. Like Flock— hoy, Bellers undo a place for teachers and minus in his society. The similarities in the two writings were smgested by no less an emith wish historian tlnn George habody Gooeh, who writes: 'fThe resemblance of Bellers' plan to the scheme of Pete carnelius is too striking to be accidentalflf‘ A H. I’. 6. Quest, Dutch socialist writer of the 19th century, a Robert cum. museum (London, 1317). p. 14.. s we. hated: coach. mmnmw Ml an m. (mmbrIdge: University Press, 1898), p. 360. . 4%, P. 359° 103 us greatly interested in the relation between Bellers and Homeboy, especially since nockhoy was a Dutchmn. Quack pur- sued an extensive investigation in his own country to discover any possible influence Ploclchoy might lave had there. It led to the discovery of tl'nipuhlication of 1688 of one Abraham 5 Van Akkeren. entitled. malaise int. ma undies. 19.939193: - . - (Establishing a profitable society of brotherly communnion, re- gulated by the rules and word of God in the Bible, comprising people of professions and sciences, tradesmen and handicraftsmen, fishermen, farmers, anl other honest people, who in semen labor with love, desire to do their work, to prevent the evils that - people so commonly foster). Ufmis little boor,'f writes Quack, 'fwas from the beginning to who“. translation of the abolish writing of machining6 In his critial commutary also: states that the plagiarised translation was an unfortunate one. his scheme 1nd SWMmeuWW. mmmalmmnmm.mmhrsmmmm WMWmeW. mimmrufldsn.lamw.m_ensam:amamm. MMMMWMWM.&1 WflWMMmmzaslmm mum. slsasn ammonium (in-teem. Cornelis Blankaert, 1688. s H. 1’. G. Quack, Men M. (Amsterdam: Van Harmon a: icon, 1892), p. 340. The first paragraph, translated verbatim from the title page of flockhoy's, LEW, follows: 'lsn wsg veer-gestalt, om de eren, in dose on andere Nation gelukkigte naken, dccr het to-samen-brengen van bequaam Vols, in sen buys-houdings vouvernement, wear in een yder behoud siJn vryheyt, en te werk-gestelt warden in sccdanigen arbeyt aIs sy bequaam sijn, sender ymand to forseeren, siJnde niet alleen sen weg om de eristenden te bevryden van het grcot ydel-quaad der menschen, near col: van alie sulke, walks hebben gesocht, en wt-gevonden. De practijke, cat sy leeven op den slaffsen-arbeyd van een ander.'f 104 been revised in the form of 72 articles, and nockhoy's original ideas often provokingly altered. Were they only errors of style and form'. But Van Akbren has also attempted to improve the original project and has deluded the characteristic ideas of Plockhcw. Not only does he change the working hours of the numbers of the society from six to ten hours (see Article 4), rearrange the routine of the two houses, city and country...» that the inhabitants move from one to the other from time to time (See Ar- ticle 24.), and stipulate tint half the income should be distributed. among the members and the other half should go to the oonmnmity (see Article 72)-bvut he institutes a modification that alters the whole pro- Ject. The thing we appreciated so much in 110ch was tint he severed all relations of his society with the interests of a particular religious sect. Sec- tarian religion during the 17th century was so clnracter istic of schemes of collective households and institutions. But Van Ami-en does his utmost to restore the sectarian idea. The society become at once a narrow brotherhood.... In short, nockhcw's social p has once more theold tasteof sectarian religion. Intcest in Piockhoy has been generated in more recent times, particularly among socialist writers and politicians. Notable among the” are H. 1’. G. Quack, socialist historian in the Nether- 8 , lands, John Downie, staunch advocate of cooperatives in Great 9 . Britain, and Eduard Bernstein, the father of Bevisionist Socialism in Germ. Bernstein sees in Plockhcw an eaer advocate of nnny of his own concepts. Be especially admires him for his realistic 7M. pp- 340-1- 8 Quest's nest extemive study is a several volume work entitled, 19, figgialigten, Per , a My (Antes-dam, Van Kampen t Zoon, .1899). he has written numerous other works, two of vhich ueanam Muhammad. 9 A member of the OoOperstive Union Limited (Holyoahe Rinse, thu- over Street, Manchester), Downie writes for its official organ, the W 31151.12; this periodical was first publist his commentary on nockhoy, entitled, ”Ester Cornelius Plockboy: Pioneer of the First Qioperative wmonwealth, 1659: as Life and Work." Q 105 approach, for his contempt for an orthodox religion, and for his attainpt to avoid the evils of a comunistic society. After having been for more than twalty years a champion of so called forthodox'f Harrism, Bermtein came to the conclusion that many of Marx's‘views no larger corresponded to the facts of modern social phenomem, and must be replaced by others more in con- scnance with modern society. Bernstein emphasized the great importance of cooperative associations, and urged the Socialist party in Germny to free itself from revolutionary phraseology an! illusory hopes of the immediate downfall of bourgeoise society, and to work hand in hand with all the democratic ele- ments that fight for social reform. Other than pirely historical interest in nodehoy in America was stimulated in the early part of tin century though the en- deavours of the late William Elliot (h'iffis, minister and writer. 10 On one of his several trips to the Netherlands Griffis, in the name of the Nethrlallls Society of Philadelphia, placed a bronse memorial tablet honoring 310ch in the town hall of zierikzee. He lad the burgomaster and chief men of the city come together on the 19th of September, 1913, and the tablet was unveiled. Before leaving America he had appropriately invited Rev. John I. Bayley, minister of the Germantown, Pennsylvania, Mennonite ehnreh, am! his 10 Although not a thorough scholar tiffis was a prolific writer. Two works on tin history of the hitch in Amrioa are, m m p; m Netherlam (New York, 1909) and 1h; m 91 331 W in an. hating .QL ....aAmm (New York. 1921). For his essay on Plockhoy see, 121s; M W l awn 1 W (Harm. 1911). Vol. 11. ONE =‘IN C::: "ST TO'I‘HE 6.1.1.11: . 11‘ 6011.110: :3.“ 1 --I§.‘iNllR 0F PIETEECORNELIS: 11:“ 11.1) 1.1 '2" 1W?" n’ZEE A'RIONEER OI“ L1:1.I%1,11-.’J1} ‘ (J \‘-.111' ' LE1"? if? IIF‘AMEIflCA NURDIQMJ'1111......1..";;:-.&3 MANENHU '11:] 1 ‘.\j: "..11"j _ 1‘. WMWRUUJII. 2']§.‘\)\'}l I I :1" , PlumA 111511.113 '1::1..-1.1 1111:1311 (D’llml 1.1: 11.33:. (W 11",” 106 Figure 6 BRONZE MOI-"(ML TABLE PLACED IN Tm TOWN HALL OF ZIBRIKZB BY WILLIAM ELLIOT GRIFFIS IN THE mm: 03' THE MEIERLANDS SOCIETY or mmmrm 107 congregation, to the memorial exercises. 'fl believe your congre- gation}? he wrote," fins the first to make public protest in America againstgslamy, but Pluckhoy was the first individual to do so. He was a liennuuite, and we honor his memory on September 19 at 11 Zisriksee, his birthplacefl An interesting sideliéht concerning the personality of 31”“ us that most of the historical tablets which he placed in various parts of the world were financed by himself but always in the name of some historical agency or society. {the Hethalands Society of Philadelphia today has no record of having ever been responsible for the I’lockhoy memorial tablet. Its present Secretary writes: W membership in the mm Society of 31118- delphia dates from January 23, 1918, and for the last twenty-two years I have been Secretary and firsasurer of it. I. believe you are misinformed about our So- ciety ever having hung a memorial tablet in honor of Mr. Plockhoy, anywhere, on any occasia. Iiiliam E. Griffis us an Associate limbm- of our Society for my years, until he died mny years ago. I knew him and remember him. He was very historically inclined and was alnys interested in some historical event, person, or paper with reference to it or him, memorial statues of someone, or otherwise. Maw of the things tlat he did we on his om initiative, and individtal effort, Iithout having a sponsor. I doubt not that he did what you say aul was present at tin dedication of the nockhoy Memorial hblet, in the Town fill of ‘ Zieriknee, Holland. hem what 1 remanber of Mr. Griffis it would be Just lib him to doeractly as you have iniiceted. 12 In an address entitled, 'fAmericsn Gratitude in Bronseflf delivered in the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel at the annual banquet of m fi 11 Bee newspaper article, "Hmors abroad for pioneer buried here," me, September 26, 1913. A hitch I “upper article which concerns Plockhcw and the memorial exercises in Zieriksee is, "'l'eee vermaarde Zierikseehrs in Iieuw Nsderlandfl film W $2124.91- November 5, 1927. 12 Personal letter from m. E. 3. J. Sickel, Secretary of the Nether- .lands Society of Buladelphia, 723 Gomcial trust Building, Philadelphia 2, h. 108 the Holland Society of New York, Griffis reported on his trip to Elland: Mwe went to tin little tan called Zieriksee. How sorry I am for Americans who go to tin figue and to Rotterdam andwho think they lave seen the Netherlands! It is the same with some Englishmen who visit the United States. lith all due regard to new York, I do not think New York is typin of the whole United States; and one proof of this assertion is that nearly all the people living on Manhattan Island were not born here. You cannot know a country by simply visiting its large cities. In th United States you met go to the county air to see who sndwlnt tin average American is andwhat he thinks; he does not take hisopinions from the mwepapers; he thinks for himself. And so, it is a good thing when in the Kethalands to so into the little towns like Zierikzee, a town that has a written history of a thousand years. In the beautiful Town Ell—am. I wish we had nnny of then like it in America-4n had the .Burgonaster and chief men or the city to come together at nine o’clock in the evening (because the tablet had arrived late through mistake) and there, in the best room, the council $11, on the nineteenth at September was unveiled the tablet to Pieter Cornelis Plockhoy. , Every lady in this room, to say nothing about tin men, ought to be interested to know who 210ch was. His descendants to-day are among the most cultivated people in the Netherlands." nockhoy had the vision of s nobler civili nation, and he tried to get Olivm‘ Well to 1'1an a certain scheme of his, which meant .the settle- ment of Delaware. 1 have nothing against him because he had no use for wlnt we call to-day “capitalists“ of s. certain kind. It was the city of Amsterdam that firmlly stood fimneialsponsor for the enterprise. In Plockhoy's settlement of twenty-five families, in- stead of twenty-five women ova- kitchen fires, he had five women to do the cooking and the preparation or the food; five women to attend to the bed linen and bedrooms; and the young mothers to take care of their little babies. All labor in this industrial colow was tint of treem, fer nockhoy's world had no slaves or unpaid toil. his rest. of their time, after shortening wisely the hours of manual toil, was devoted to spiritual and intellectual v—vvv . The Mennonites of the Estherlands as a whole might lave been referred to, although tlnre is still living today at Ministerpark 14-9., Hilversum, the Netherlands, an indivichzal by name of Pieter. corneliss Plokhooy, who claims to have descended from the reforma'. 109 culture....in A.D. 1914, in this very hotel and in all large hotels and apartment houses, what is to-day the LBJ. of practice, such as central lighting, heating, and cooking was the idea of nodshoy, over two hundred years ago. Then there was not a paved or lighted street in Northern narope. Furthermore, nockhoy's was the first voice raised in Amerim against slavery. Surely, we ought to rememba' his name, and so, in this town it Zier iksee where he was born, we put up this tablet:l fi fi 18 mummwmnmm lfilio. pp. 227-8. ‘-' e Chapter VII. RETROSPECT AND CONCLUS ION Plockhoy's ultimte goal was religious reformation, the establishmenton earth of what he believed to be the 'fform and doctrine at Christ." This is the central theme of m. writings, particularly in his~letters to the Gromells. But it is not this theme which gives his tracts significance. i'hey merit at- tention rather because of the social, economic, and political ideas which 210ch set down in his attempt to point the way towards the establishment of the kind of society on earth which he believed to be in harmony with tin teachings of Christ. These ideas reveal (1) that Plockhoy was possessed with an insight into the nature and prospects of group activity, (2) that he believed in the fundamntal principles underlying democratic rule, (3) that he possessed a considerable understanding, not only of human motivation, but of the political and economic pro— cesses, (4) that his progam of action was designed to meet the needs or his time in a realistic fashion, (5) that he was con- vinced that the Qirietian ideal of brotherhood was a workable principle, (6) that within limits “one world'f must be achieved. These are the‘understandings which‘both linkhim to and set him apart from his seventeaith century contanporaries, and give him some claim to the distinction of having one of the first-class minds of his period. In Holland Plockhoy lived in environments in which Anabaptist elements predominated. In many ways his ideas were related to the lll doctrine and philosophy of the less radical Anabaptists descended from the Swiss Brethren and closely associated with Menno Simons and his followers. Like the Mennonites Plockhoy sought to restore Christendom to the form of Apostolic times. Rb pleaded sdth men to give up tmir worldly ways and live as the Apostles. They should be in the world, but not of the world. E even advocated tint it were better that they separate themselves from society and live in conmunion with others of like mind, rather than continue to follow their sinful ways. In the new environment the members would live simply, wear simple and practical clothes. The Bible would be their rule, and each one mould be responsible to himself in matters of interpretation and to God for his shortcomings. In all of these ways Plockhoy believed as the Mennonites. But in a few respects he differs, and the dis imilarities become more apparent and real then the similarities. Plockhoy was ultra- antisectarian, sanctioned the use of force in government, and minimind the importance of baptism as a Christian rite. The Mennonites were a sect, were nonresistant and would have no resort to force, and practised the rite of adult baptism. 210ch was one of the many liberals in the church, like Galenus Abrahams de man. As such he was a typical product of the crisis of the Mennonite Church of the Netherlands in the 17th century. Hem the Mennonites in the village of Zieriksee in Zeeland, he probably first learned to oppose sectarian division. He later sinred views with the lammiste, who minimized the importance of creeds or strict rules'of discipline. Out of the conflict which 112 divided the Iammists from the Zonists in the Mennonite (March of Amsterdam. came a flickering of hope on the part of some Lemmists for a universal Christendom. This notion too finds its way into Flockhoy's plans. Of even greater signifimnce is nodshoy's affiliation with the hitch Gollegiants. fliree Gilleaant notions are dominant in his tracts. First was the idea that an absolute tolerance for diverse opinions and views must be maintained, rather than insistence upon uniformity in matters of belief and practice. Second was the belief in freedom of thought, interpretation, and expression in all aspects of life rather than bondage to creeds or confessions of faith. And third was the substitution of reason for complacent acceptance of traditional viewpoints or of those in authority. On the basis of these notions Plockhoy defined the universal Christendom which he wanted Gromell to inaugurate. It was mt to be state supported. It was anti-chlvinist. It had no professional clergy, little organisation. The mllggia were the prototypes of the common meeting—places he wished to set up in each comnity. Also from the Oollegiants Plockhoy derived the belief that divine truth Imist be confirmed by signs and miracles. In addition to the Mennonites and the Oollegiants, the flamm- atom seem to have had an influence on Flockhoy. Radical social ideas were considered in the 'fmeet Rest,’f but in the attempt to restore Christianity 'fonce more to a single sheeps fold,'f as Zoet wrote. There was over lapping of thought between these three 113 hitch groups. Indeed there were liennonites among the R f rmateurs, many among the Collegiants, and the latter were eventually totally absorbed in Mennonite congregations. In England Plockhoy was associated with several ruritan pam- phleteers. Similarities of his ideas to those presented by various Puritans of the Left suggests that he should be classified also with this segment of Puritanism. While his first scheme was influenced by conditions in Elland, was religious in nature, and expressed Dutch thought, his. second was propogated by conditiom in England, was socio-economic in nature, and expressed ideas de- rived through contact uth English reformers. Through Ertlib Plockhoy received encouragement and probably an understanding of the communal arrangement of the households of the Moravian Breth- ren. He got from then, perhaps, the not ion of common labor with limited private property.1 Goxmmmal living was advocated, as was seen, by the Leveller, William Walwyn, and the Digger, Gerrard Winstanley. hut certain disimilarities which set Plockhoy apart 1 concerning the working errhngement of the conunlnity, nockhoy seems to have borrowed heavily from the Utopia of Sir Thomas More. A disdain for desire and wealth, simple attire, meals taken in salmon with women on one side of the hill and men on the other, political power vested in a single band, the importance of an educational system, a six hour work day, the devotion of liesure time to the development of the mind an! to healthful recreation, few laws, and the belief in a single supreme Being that made and governs the world, were concepts in Utopia. In regard to religion the people of Utopia are not required to accept a uniform faith. Hence all religious views are tolerated which are not manifestly anti-social. Public worship is so arranged that each an participate readily in accordance with his own feelirgs, and yet expres- sive of a common brotherhood. All of these notiom are who died in a flea We. 114 from the Levellers, the Diggers, and others make it necessary to attach important qualifications to these classifications. Plockhoy was not a philosopher who attempted to construct a system of ideas. E was rather a man possessed with a zeal for reform, whose writings reflect the intense desire of the reformer to see his projects realized in his own lifetime. Plockhoy's letters to Oliver and Richard Ch'onmell are persuasive. logical argummt is augmented with appeals to the motives be suspected most leaders of having. But his logic was not faulty. He was able to support his conclusions in a systematic fashion. And throughout his letters there are revealed certain insights into the nature of human beings and the society in which he lived, which understandings set him apart from many of the 17th century proPagandi sts. Plockhoy's ideas are only significant in their historical context. It would not only be un-histor ical but quite unprofitable to remove them from the 17th century scene and examine them in imlation. Whit developments in the realm of ideas were occuring during the period in which he wrote? To what extent was his thought representative of that of his contemporaries? The 17th century was a period of change. Behind it were the centuries of medievalism and the beginning of the Rennaissance. Ahead of it was the intellectual revolution known as the Rilighten- ment. Many of the developments which started in the 16th century or before reached their zeniths in the 18th century. lb a large extent events of the 17th century mark the transition of ideas or 115 practices from an earlier to a later period. In the events of the 17th century may be detected the change from a moral to a scalar outlook in politics and other fields of human interest. The Puritans were products of sscularizing tendencies insofar as the Reformtion was a result of rati omlism and other secular- ixing forces. They contributed to this trend by their inner disunity and lack of agreement, for they made impossible the com- pulsion of beliefs that a single, unified church of believers could have exerted upon society, and they thereby freed indivi- duals and groups to call into question with only slight risk the sstablislnd traditions of the time. There is also apparent in the 17th century a change from an agrarian to an industrial civilisation. This change was attended by the rise of the middle class to dominance and the decline of aristocratic power. The 17th century reaped the harvest of 16th century geographical dis- covery, an age which had opened for the mind vast vistas of ex- ploitation and discovery. People became accustomed to novelty and diversity; they became aware of the possibility of changing in- stitutions in order to attain certain objectives. The rise of science saw the displacement of the Ptolemaic by the Copernican system, and with it a weakming of the theology which had sponsored the Ptolemaic theory. A new faith began to grow, a faith in science. Samuel Ihrtlib, one of the Interregnum writers and friend of Plcckhoy, is an example of a pamphleteer unier the influence of the new faith in science. The latter part of the seventeenth century and the eighteenth century saw the flowering of many of these trends. The monolithic 116 alliance of church and state was shattered. Democratic philo- sophy gained wide acceptance and with it same the establishment of republican institutions. The pace of industrialism accelerated from the middle of the 18th century on. Humanistic philosophies were formulated by the Lockes in England and by the Voltaires in France. One has only to compare the ideas of Plockhoy and other writers in written wand to 18th century doctrines to set that they were in some measure harbingers of the age of Mightenment to come. Scholars of Puritanism have differentiated the parties of the Left from the Presbyterians, the Independents, and the Erastians. Among the Puritans of the Left are included the Levellers and the Fifth Monarchy hen. While these latter two groups were radically different in many respects, one notable difference being that the Levellers were democratic in outlook while the Fifth Monarchy Men were not, they have a more-cr-lsss common origin (descended from the Anabapt ists and Separatiete) and they shared e belief in the total separation of church and stats. It is on this particular issue that the wide divergence between the Levellers and the Fifth lionarcby Men on the one hand, and the Presyyterians and Independ- ents on the other is noticeable. The Presbyterians stood for the establishment of Presbyterianism and the suppression of all other doctrines. The Independents are found in the center, in that they would accept the formal establishment of Presbyterianism, provided other faiths and churches were tolerated. The Erastians were secularists and willing to settle for any arrangement which would 117 not be tyrannical or threaten the peace of the ration. Politically the Presbyterians, Independents, and Puritans of the Left were right, center, and. left in that order. The Hesby- terians led the attack on absolutism, but they were also opposed to the establishment of the people ’s sovereignty. . Supported by aristocrats and wealthy merclnnts the Presbyterians wished only to vest the ult irate political authority in parliament. They were riglt ist in their intention to preserve the sanctity of property. The Independents differed from the Presbyterians in their desire to provide security, not only against the king, but aginst Par- liament as well. Throughout the struggles airing the Puritan Revolution the Independents were often allied with the Levellers; but it was an alliance of expediency more tlnn an alliance of parties agreed on fundamental issues. The Levellers alone extolled the virtues of democracy. On the matter of the status of private property the Levellers were probably closer to the Independents and the Presbyterians than they were to such ele- ments as Winstanley's. Diggers, who espoused the cause of economic Justice. A Exceptions to every generalisation about the character of Puritanism as a whole are easily found. To set forth the prin- ciples that Puritans of all kinds accepted is a difficult if not impossible task. One can only suggest similarities in attitude and outlook. It is possible, for sample, to assert that all the Puritan elements were determined to erect a community in accor- dance with their interpretation of God's will, but it is not 118 possible to find any unanimity on the fundamental teachings of the Gospel that they would have applied in the reform of their society. It is possible to claim that there existed among all Puritan groups a zeal for reform, but it would be unrealistic to argue tmt their proposals were uniform in kind or in inten- sity. There is evidence which will indicate a general tendency on the part of all Puritans to distinguish between what were requirements of a worldly moiety on the one hand, and what were requirements of a Christian society on the other, but there is no evidence to indicate any agreement on the specific obligations of the individual who wished to conform to the Biblical teachings. By-and—largs the Puritans were individualistic; but a wide differ- ence is apparent between the Presbyterian, instructed to accept the teachings of Galvin, and the Anabaptist, for whom religion was mostly an affair between each individual and his God. Our task of isolating commonly accepted points of view, in order that we might have a basis upon which to compare the ideas of Plockhoy with those of his contemporaries, is less difficult when we direct our attention to those groups who were not Pree- bytsrians, Independents, or Erastians. Here a marked similarity begins to be distinguishable. Most of the Puritans of the Left stood for religious toleration. Most of thm agreed that a. separation of church and state was not only desirable, but in- dispelsabls to a peaceful society. Most of the Puritans of the Left derived their dogma from the flew Testament,and they combined it with appeals to the law of nature as a reliable basis upon which to founi a well-ordered society. 119 Plockhoy probably felt quite at home with many of the Puritans he met. Nest of his ideas and proposals must have feund.an interested.and sympathetic audience in men like Whlwyn the Leveller, for they lived in the same climate of opinion. If there was disagreement it hardly could lave existed over goals to be achieved. Any variance between.Plockhoy and his English Puritan friends must in.all probability have centsred.around.the means to be used, rather than the ends to be gained. Or perhaps the differences were only in degree—-the extent to which it was desirable to depart from established institutions and practices. Wherein must they have been in agreement? In what respects do his writings indicate differences with the Raritans of the Left? Upon the major issue of the sepration of church and state Plockhoy was definitely aligned with those who advocated the desirability and.necessity of’separation. Again and again Plockhoy pleads, “Assist not with the sword or money of the Gbmmonwealth any sect ~or person in particular.’ What is wrong with the estab- lishment by government of a state‘church? Plockhoy answers this question, and in.doing so reveals one of his underlying‘bsliefs. fIf it were the magistrate's work to set up a national ministry, then we should be in danger to have as many religions as there be several ways of government in.ths world, and the magistrates changing their Opinion, the‘whole national ministry must also as often be changed.f Plockhoy espoused the cause of a universal church. In fact, it may be said.that this is his principal ob- Jective. But he does not believe that the universal church can 120 be established through compulsion. It will be achieved only when the magistrates will cease to hinder the truth from manifesting ‘ itself by its own power. Thue P‘lockhoy advocates the separation of church and state as the first condition necessary to the establishment of a universal church of believers. In his second letter to cronwell he advocates not only separationof church and state but the corollary doctrine of free worship. While a universal church was the end Plockhoy hoped would be achieved, he proposed that tha‘e should be freedom for all sects. The arguments he used were three in number. In the first place 'fit belongs only to God aui erist to lave dominion over consciencesflf Second, liberty is a goal in itself. He implies this when he " urges the magistrates to prevent “any from exercising Lordship over the consciences of others}? because in doing so 'fthey would be true maintainers and defenders of liberty.'f Third,‘Plockhoy argues that ‘fto deal equally in matters of religion towards sub- Jects is notionly good and pious, but is also the foundation of good governmentflf Beligiom freedom contributes to good govern— ment in that it eliminates the causes of strife which destroy the stability of society and cause the governors to fear that one or another faction will undermine the government. Like Walwyn, Overton, and other Puritans of the Left Plockhoy often-refers to the law of nature as the preper guide‘for hwnan conduct. In charging Gronwell with his duties and responsibilities he admonished him not to follow the traditions of men, but to examine and repeal the laws which are contrary to the law of nature. 121 Most of the Puritans were inclined to test dogma with logical thought. Nor did the alritans distinguish between the law of nature and. the revealed will of God. They were in complete conformance. The revealed Word provided the fundamental as- sumptions, the law of nature the logical arguments from those assumptions. With some groups, like the Levellers, the law of nature was the foundation of their political creed. Piockhoy appeals to reason throughout his writings, and notwithstanding his nnny references to Scripture, he depends primarily upon the 'freasonsbleness" of his ideas. One of theimportant contributions of Plockhoy, the Level- lers, and other Puritan elements to the history of social and political thought was their recognition of the limitations inher— rent in the use of force. Force does not contribute to progress and stability, but is rather a hindrance to it. In direct contrast to the Presbyterians Plockhoy argued that it was folly in press a belief upon a man "before he can apprehend it with his own understanding}. A men canmt be expected to hold a belief with sincerity and conviction unless he understands and accords with the logic of it. Force excludes the power of the idea itself, and makes ineffective a concept that otherwise might play a positive role. Force tends to defeat the attainment of truth, for truth manifests itself only where an atmosphere of freedom permits free reign to less logical ideas. Plockhoy would have partially agreed with Justice Oliver Wendel Holmes Jr. that truth lies in the power of antidea to get itself accepted on the open market. Plockhoy 122 believed that freedom of speech and worship were necessary not only to the attainment of truth, but in order that men might become disposed to treat their fellow men with generosity and sympathy. What he was arguing was that as men learn to unler- stand each ot her's motives, fears, and aspirations they will come to be tola'ant and charitable. Perhaps Plockhoy's faith of liberty was naive; but if so, then the efforts of modern organizations working towards international peace and harmony are also naive, for the assumption which underlies most of these efforts is the same one which nocklny made. This insight alone gives Plockhoy some claim to recognition. Plockhoy's writings reveal definite humanitarian impulses. Where he lacks the sophistication of an Overton he posses a genuine concern for human welfare. The hard attitude which is so often attributed to the New England Puritan is not characteristic of Plockhoy. At the end of his first letter to Gromell is appended the Biblical quotation, "Give ear to the poor, for the cry of them is exceeding great in'these Natio ns.'f Much of wlnt Piockhoy had to say was simply an elaboration of‘this theme. Plockhoy’s conception of the proper role of the state quite definitely associates him with the Puritans of the Left. Those elemmts thought the state to be the highest political eXpression of a society. Government, as the agency of the state, was created to keep the peace and establish public order. But this was as far as government was entitled to go. Its function were to be largely negative, the restraining of individuals and groups in society who in the absence of restraint would impose their will 123 upon other individuals and groups. In other words, it was govern- ment 's responsibility to establish and maintain a condition of liberty. Plockhoy in m my attempts to co rstruct a theory of the state. He simply sets forth the role of the magistrate, asserting that it was the function of magistrates to act as moderators. He nowhere gives any indi mtion that he believes that government should provide for the general welfare in more material ways. He looks rather to the formation of cooperative societies for the relief of the poor and distressed. His preposals in this matter are found in his writing, A lay W 1122.ng 11g 29.93. in lines all 9am; .49.th Esmer- One of the practices of Plockhoy's time was compulsory tithing. He strongly urged Cromwell to abolish the laws compelling men to tithe, for he thought such laws entirely contrary to reason. He objected to compulsory tithing for many reasons. In the first place, he was by reason of his Collegiant beliefs opposed to a professional ministry. It was his conviction that most ministers sought after riches rather than truth. What is more, he believed tint true interpretation! of the gospel could only be achieved through the medium of discussion groups which he called assemblies. No one was particularly qualified to give an authoritative inter- pretation of the meaning of God's word. In the second place, he thought compulsory tithing to be inimical to stable government in that it gave power to church officials which could in many cases be used against the magistrates themselves. Whether or not 124 Plockhoy, in presenting this argument, was simply using a debator's technique is open to question; but the history of the times indi- cated only too well the sense of this argument. In the third place, Plockhoy believed that tithes were an intolerable burden upon the poor and slnuld be eliminated for that reason if for no other. His was a social mission-—the relief of the distressed. The logical place to begin was by abolishing the compulsory payment of tithes. This particular cause which he promoted in his letters to the Cromwells ties in with his philosophy of government. The magistrates were mt to aid any religious group except by maintaining the right of all to exist free from restraint and persecution. It is often suggested tlat men like Plockhoy only advocated such anegativs role for government because they held no real hope of over control- ling government in the interest of their own religious group, and that their theoretical Justifications for a government of that kind did not reveal a true interest in liberty for its own sake. This may be true to some extent, but the question is relatively unim— portant to the political theorist and historian. What is important is tiat, irrespective of their true motives, their promotion of the cause of limited government and freedom helped establish the groundwork upon which democratic systems could be founded. Tlat there is no merit in maintaining methods simply because they have become traditioml is also a theme commonly found among Puritan writings. The Puritans were reformers who heped to gain acceptance for their doctrines. Where the institutions and techniques of the time reinforced the established church and the power of the monarchy it was necessary for them to challenge not 125 only the church and monarch, but also the myths and customs by which these were sustained. In Plockhoy's writings are to be found admonitiom to tie magistracy not to follow tradition, but rather to substitute institutions and methods in conformance to what he believed was the law of mture and the revealed will of God. Plockhoy's writing, 5M Prgpgunded, is chiefly interesting for its description of the cooperative societies he proposed to establish. The work cannot be called a utOpia, notwithstandirg the fact tlat he painted a picture of an ideal situation, for his societies were designed to exist in the world of his time. The society would sell its manufactured articles in the markets, com— peting with othe‘s on their own ground. While he proposed that the buildirgs, land, ships, and tools be owned in common, he made allowances for private property. Not only were the members permitted to have money and own property, they were also entitled to leave the membership when they chose to do so, taking with them what they lave contributed plus a fair share of any profits the society lad earned. Plodchoy's interest in the welfare of the poor did not sirgle him out from 511 other Puritans or the Left. Winstanley and his Diggers are well-known for their efforts to remedy the economic ills of trat time. Some interesting comparisons of the ideas of Winstanley and those of Plockhoy can be made. Both appealed to the law of nature, and interpreted that law to entitle all mankind to some means of subsistence. Both affirmed tint private property 126 was one of the main causes of want, abuse, and. corruption, though Winstanley more strongly declaimed against it than did Plockhoy. Both would have left family and personal effects untouched in the societies they proposed to create. Both would have regulated their societies through democratic means, though flockhoy was more specific in his ideas about the kind of democratic insti tu- tions and procedures he would have established. Both were violently anti—clergy, attributing to the clergy of the time the perpetuation of tyranny and injustice. But here the similarities in their respective ideas end. Where Winstanley looked upon land as the basis of a sound economic system, Plockhoy looked towards industry. Where Winstanley would lave changed the whole society of the time, Plodrhoy would have made adjustments to the conditions which pre- vai led, and proposed rather that an attempt be made to establish decent living through techniques of adaptation. One would have launched a direct assault against the political and economic environment, and in a way did so; the otha' would have used the prevailing system to the advantage of himself and his followers. In a sense, Winstanley had the makings of a revolutionary, while flockhoy possessed the temperament of a reformer. The revolution- ary appeals through symbols; the reformer persuades by argument. The differences are in the degree of (marge demanded and the techniques by which such clange is to be accomplished. Modern political scientists will find interesting Plockhoy's proposal to set up gena'al assemblies, because his justification for such assemblies is precisely the theory which underlies the 127 discm sion group method found in democratic states. One of the assumption underlying democratic government is that in the long run conclusions arrived at through the means of free and open discussion are more likely to be valid than those which become public policy in societies where tolerance of discussion does not exist. The right to discuss issues openly permits a diversity of ideas. Where such a diversity exists ideas may be considered for their me'it. The criterion of the authority behind the idea yields the criterion of the logic of the idea. Plockhoy defends freedom of discussion on these grounds, and in doing so implies the desirability of a democratic system of government. Tlat flockhoy was a republican is beyond question.2 In the articles which he drew up for the government of his Delaware colony we note the following provisions: (1) The princiml basis or foundation for this society will be an equality for which purpose every man over 2.4 years of age who wishes to enter the society must seriously and earnestly promise that he will never strive for any special power, nor will allow anyone else to make the least efforts in that direction, but resists this with all possible means. (2) All rules will be instituted by a majority of two-thirds of the entire society.. ..the votes being case on ballots. (3) Everyone of the voting colonists, according to his best knowledge, will nominate or choose as head of the colony the one 2 Republican is defined as one who advocates representative govern—' ment. 128 whom he considers tle most prominent in means, intelligence, and knowl edge. (4) When the number of colonists increases by twenty men, a public servant shall be elected in order to increase the number of public servants. '(5) The piblic presiding servant shall be open to criticism on all his actions concerning the public interest as well as to law suits up to one year and six weeks after the eXpiration of his term of service. That Plockhoy was a democrat is equally clear. Be affirmed the values of liberty, equality, and fraternity. Be includes in his colonial articles provisions to insure the responsibility of the gova'nors to tie governed. He provides that all laws shall be passed, not in the interest of a few, but in the interest of the whole people. And more revealing is his unierstanding of the mture of liberty and the benefits which accrue to society in which liberty is a reality. Unlike many of his Puritan contemporaries Plockhoy promoted the brotherhood of man. He unierstood brotherhood to mean generosity, kindness, symmathy, and a willingness to work for the relief of human suffering. But he was not free from prejudice. Excluded from his mlony were Roman (htholics, "parasitic Jews, headstrong Quakers,and Anglican Puritans, and rash and stupid believers in the millsniumff He failed to see that his prejudices contradicted his belief in the brotherhood of man. At least so the record indicates. Had he also combated these animosities his name might now be well known to the students of history. While we cannot forgive him 129 these hates, we can understand their origin. Plockhoy was strug- gling against the domination of organized churches, and particue- larly the rule of the clergy. He dissented against all organi zed religion; and while he believed in the power of truth to manifest itself whm'e freedom exists, he was unable to make himself rely on this principle alone. It is ironical that a man should have presented such rational arguments for the elimination of force in matters of opinion, and then find, himself unable to eliminate force when the opportunity was his. But social reformers like Plockhoy had their effect. They helped to make the world aware of the vast gulf which separated the values men believe in and the practices they engage in. B 1131. IOGRAPHY Andrews, Charles BIL, The @lgnial Period QLAmerican Histgjy, Vol. III, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1935. Asher, George Ms, A; Bibliggaphical and Histgrical Essgy 9; 1133 mtgh Mg; lamphletg Elating _t_Q, M Netlezlgn . Ameter dam, 1868. Beal, John, grgfgrdshire Orghardg g Bittern fgr all gland. London, 1657. Bellsrs, John, Prgmgls fgr rgisipg a_ allege 9;. Industry... London, 1695. Bernstein, Eduard, §gzialismns und Embatie i_n der Grossen Mic: gheg Revglutiop. Stuttgart, 1922. Translated into mush by H. J. Stenning under the title, Cromwell and mmunism: Sggial ism g1 Demggagy 1;; 1:113. Great @glish Rgvglution. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd. , 1930. Bidloo, lambertus, Onbeml gs V dr id Q verwgegtigg & W. Amsterdam, 1701. Brodhead, J. Romsyn, £18er QLthe §§_a_te QLMM New York: Harper and Brothers, 1874. Brodhead, J. Romeyn, and E. B. O‘Qillaglan, qumntg Rglativg m m legnigl Hisggry g_f_ the §tate 21M Y9 K- New York, 1850-1877. Quoted as Egg: m M ligament; , Catalgggg qgthe m, liflsgpers, and Manuscripts Relatipg _t,g_ the Civil War, the gaggnwealth, and Rest ati n, lelegted p1 Gggrge Thgmamn, 1649-1661. Vol. 1. London: The British Exhiseum, 1908. Channing, Edward, AMA! the United States. Vol. II. New York: The Macmillan 00., 1908. Chapple, Eliot Dismore and Carleton Stevens Goon, Principles offin- W. New York: Henry Holt and Co., 1942. Corwin, E. T., Ecclesiastigal Reggrds pithe Stategfiflfl Xgrk. Vol. Cros slw, James, Thg Diary and @rresmndence Q_f_ l_l_r_. Jghn ‘fiprfliington. Vol. 1. Manchester; The Gietlam Society, 1847. Published as Vol. £111 of Remains Higmr ical gpg Literam gznnegted with t_1_i_e_ Relating anties g; Langgter and Chester. Delaware. Federal Writers-Project. New York: Viking hose, 1958. 151 Downie, John, Pe__t__er @rnslius P1:Qckbgy flgneer fth___e_ Fi__r__st m- tive gimmenwealth 1659: His Life and Work. Q_Ma.nchester: Cooperative Printing Society, 1933. Eden, Sir Frederick, The State 9; the 22' or, 9.11.112. hifigry g_f_th§ labourip‘ 3 classes Ln gland. London, 1797. Femow, Berthold, "New Nethe rlani or the Ditch in North America: Critical Essay on the Sources of Information," Narratives and Gritigal Hisggrg 9L mrica. Vol. IV, edited by Justin Winsor. Boston: lbughton, hifflin and 00., 1884. The Emantown Rathbuch. In the Historical Society of Pennsylvania. Gooch, George Peabody, The History Q1 mush Democratic Ideag in the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge: University Press, 1898. Griffis, William Elliot, The Stggy of. New patient-mpg. New York, 1909. Griffis, William Elliot, The mtg; p; the Netherlands Lathe Llakigg generics. New York, 1921. Ihller, William, 22;; Rigg g; Puritanism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1938. Harder, Leland, "P10 ckhoy and his Settlement at Zwaanendael, 1665," Delgwarg mm. vo1. III (march 1949). Reprinted in Menngnitg anrterly Review. Vol. mu (July 1949). Ihrtlib, Samuel,A __ Descript ign QLLhe Eamon. 0qu iggggm aim. ghéging its exgellgnp nment, in; Dglmue. London, 1641. Hogs, Christian, and Christian Neff, Mennonigischss 3551,1593, Vol. II. Frankfurt am Main, 1913. "Honors Abroad for Pioneer Buried Here,“ German mantowg Mependent Gas tte, September 26,1913. Horst, Irwin, "Pieter Cornelia: Plockhoy: An Apostle of the Collegiants," WWW Revi , Vol. x1111. (July 1949). 1371116113., 0. B. Reformateurs: @schiedkun digs §tudi§n 9v erd__e_ gogg- dienstige Bewegingep ELI d_e_ Nadagep nzer qud 93 2911.1. —Hs.arlem: Willink and Zoom, 1902. Jameson, J. Fi'anklin, Narrativeg 9_f_ New Netherland, 1609-1664. New Kalff, Gerritt, Gesghiedenig der Nederlandsche Letterkunde, Vol. IV. Groningen: J. B. Waltes, 1909. 132 Klaass, Jan, d'Uystekenste Digs-KunstBe werkken dogr gig Zoet, Amsterdammer. Hoorn, 1675. E933. Verhael van Nieuw Ngderlantg. ... Amsterdam, 1662. Reprinted in 1665 under the title, Zigegerg Vrye Vogrslagpn g3; Egrsgekgn... Iaidler, Harry T., Social-kangmig 275’ vements. Row York: Thoms Y. Crowell Co., 1945. Lammere i h: Anderg Mennonisten Kercken-Twist, 1663. In the Bethel College Historical Library. McKinley, Albert, "The Transition from Ditch to mush Rule in New York," Amerign Higtgr 193.; Review, Vol. VI. (April 1901). llolhuysen, P. C. and Fr. K. H. Kossmann, Niew Negergndsgh Big- gpaphigch Wogrdenbgek. Leiden, 1911. Muller. Frederik. We we aim.» lasso Eateries rice. A_m- sterdam, 1872. Murphy, Henry G., Anthglggyg; New Nethe rland. New York: The Bradford Club, 1865. O'Qillaghan, E. B., gistgry QINGW Netherland, Vol. II. New York: Do Appleton and %s, 1845. . Ogiginal Land Titleg i3 glaware ngmogy Maths Duke 9}; Ygrk Repgrds, 1646-1672. Wilmington, Delaware, 1899. Owen, Robert, Neg View Q_f_ Sggiety. London, 1817. Pennypacker, Samuel W. , me Settlement 91; GermantggLn. Philadelphia, 1899. Pennypacker, Samuel W. , Higggr ical aid Bigggaphical Sketgheg. Phila- delphia, 1883. Plockhoy, Pieter Correlis, Thg Fay 3.91m Peace and Settlement Q_f_ the gg Natigng.... London, 1659. Plockhoy, Pieter Cornelia, A E11 Prgpounded _t9_IHiake 31.32.213.12 phage 119. other Nations £291.... London, 1659. Appenied thereto, gr; Infltatig ID. 131 aggrementigng Society. Plockhoy, Pieter Cornsli s, Egrt & Klaer Qntwerp. Amsterdam, 1662. Quack, H. P. G., Beglden g1; Groggen. Amsterdam: Van Kampen and 20011, 1892. _ Quack, H. P. G., & Sgcialifien, Persgnen, an §tel§els. Amsterdam: Van Kampem and Zoon, 1899. 133 Raesly, Ellis Lawrence, Portrait Q_f_ New 1‘l’etherland. New York: Columbia University Press, 1945. Rife, Clarence W., "Land Tenure in New Fatherland," Esggys in lo- nial histgry Presented 19. giggles 1cLe_a_n_ Andrews 33;; his Students. New Haven: Isle University Press, 1931. Sabine, George 11., Thg Works 01 Qgrrard Wipgtanley. Itleca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1941. Schenk, Wilhelm, The Qanern fgr Sggial Jugtice in the Puritan Revglu- tign. London: Longmans, Green and 00., 1948. Scott, Walter, The ngerg lelectig‘gg Tracts, Vol. VI. London, 1811. Sellers, Edwin Jaquett, Allied Ewilgs of mlaware. Philadelphia: Lippincott 00., 1901. . Smith, C. Henry, Th9 Stgy g_f_the Mennonites. Berna, Indiana: henno- nite Book Concern, 1941. . Th'oeltsch, Ernest, The Sggia; Teachim QLEhO gistian M. Vol. II. London, 1931. Turner, C. .H. B., m Records offiussex County, Delaware. Phila- delphia, 1909. "Wee Vermaarde Zierikzeeers in Hieuw Iiederlantfl Nieuwe figtgerdamsche @urant, November 5, .1927. . Van Akkeren, Abraham, Stichpipg 10.17. m pgdige Societefl. Amsterdam, 1688. . Vincent, Framis, A Histgry pithe State Q; Delaware. Philadelphia: John Campbell, 1870. Vlekke, Bernard, Evolution of 3,123 mtgh Nation. New York: Roy Pub- lihhers, 1945. Walwyn, William, Thg .29 wer of Love. London, 1643. Walwyn, Lilburne, Prince, and Overton, A Manifestation of those pp- jggtly styled Lgvellerg. London, 1649. Wilbur, Earl M. , A Histgry Q; Unitarianism; Sgcinianism and it! Antegedentg. Qambridge: Harvard University Prass, 1947. Winstanley, Gerrard, M Law gLf_ Riflteousness. London, 1654. Woodhonse, A. s. a, Puritanism and Liberty. London: J. ii. Dent and Sons, 1938. . APPENDIX A AUTmRSHIP OF THE KURT VERHAEL "The most remarkable of allthe contemporary Dutch books appeared...anonymously in 1662.71 It was the MMM 33.19.! Nederlantg.... The piblicati on was a collection, with two distinct parts and two authors. The first part comprises the preface, the description of New Netherland (Pages 1 to 27) and the postscript (pages 68 to 84). The [second part, comprising the Re no ten, Vertg‘gen, g5; Deductien submitted to the Amsterdam magistrates, and with which this study is concerned, covers pages 28 to 67. A careful comparison of the ideas, style, dates, and places mentioned in the addresses, with the writings which bear Plockhoy's name, leads to the inevitable conclusion that the addresses came indirectly from Plockhoy and his associates, and apply to his New Netherland colony. This is not the first time this conclusion has beal made. J. Romeyn Brodhead, who discovered the publication in Ibllandwhenhe was collecting in European archives materials relating to New York's early history, and E. B. o'oellnghen, were the first to ascribe the direction relation bet- . 2 ween these addresses and Plockhoy. These scholars were acquainted 1 Barthold Fernow, "New Netherland or the Dutch in North America: Critical Essay on the Sources of Information," Narratives gpg' Critigl History QLAHBI‘ ice, IV. edited by Justin Winsor. (Boston: Houghton, liii‘flin and_Co., 1994), pp. 422—3. 2 John Romeyn Brodhead, History 9.: t_h_e_ State E; New Ygrk. (New York: .Ihrper and Brothers, 1874, pp. 698-9; E. B. O'Callaghan, Histgry fimNetherland II. (New York: D. Applaon and 00., 1845), pp. 956-9. . 155 with most of the Ditch publications on colonization and with all of the various attempts at settlement. Frederik Muller, well-known book-collector and -dealder in Amsterdam in the last century, writes concerning the @rt Earhagli This book is written, as appears by No. 1111,’by a Mennonite, a certain H.V. 2.3.1., in behalf of some persons (probably Mennonites) inploring his assistance. It is one of the agrgest of all books on how Eetherland. I found only 3 copies in the course of 20 years and. sold my last at 200 flor... .The writer developed his liberal and economical ideas still further in N . 1111. No. 1111 mentioned by Muller was the 1123; MW... (Free Political Aphorisms... ).4 It was written by the same H.V.Z.I-l. as the Kort Verhael, which according to the author 'fhad been merely a first essay on the means of restoring to Holland the old force, energy, and preponderance. 75 It was printed by P. A. keep, the 'fordinary printer of Mennonite books."‘6 It was reprinted in the same year by J. Venckel in Amsterdam. ' The Emit Verhael was also repr inted in 1665 under a new title: Zeekere 113g Vgorslag7en_p_p_ Versoeken.. . (certain Free Propositions and Requests. .. ). 3 Frederik Muller, Qatal us g_f_ Books, Taps, Plates 9}; America. (Amsterdam, 1872), p. 125. 4 Vrije 2911311152 Stellipgen an. cgnsideratien van Staat... trgigendg to]; gen ware verbeeteripgh van Staat 9n Kerk. He: eerst deel. (Amsterdam, 1665). (Free Political Aphorisms and Considerations of State serving for a true amelioration of State and Church. The first volume). 5 See Erederik Miller, omcit” p. 127. 6 Jada-9.3.1:.- 7 Zeekere Vrye Vooigsrlagen pg Versoeken, tot bevordering van een vestandi e, v09; 119' llandt hogghnutte Vrye VolgL-Uitzetting i3 Nieuw-llederlandt. Alsmeede een by—ggvgeght beknopt verhael van Niemv-I‘Iederlaptg geleggntheit, nz. Eteerste deel. (Amsterdam, 1665). (Certain fies Propositions and Requests, in favour of a Perpetual and to Holland very useml emigration to New Netherland. With an account of the situation etc. of New Fatherland. First Volume). 136 The only historian to dispute Brodhead and O'Oallaghan's conclu- sion regarding authorship of the addresses to the magistrates in the 3.2.11.3. Verhael was G. M. Asher, who gives five reasons for believing that the latter and Plockhoy's we; mm applied to different schemes.8 Asher, whose study was admittedly very cursory, was erroneous in all respects of his arguments. 'fPerhaps," he admits at the beginning of his discussion, "1 maybe deceived in many of 115' first deductionsflf9 { (1) Asher argued that the Plockhoy company was to consist of only 25 families, that of the £933; Verhael of not less than 100. On the contrary, the Maggie; Ontwerp also described a settlement of a desired minimum 100 men (see gloss in the contract below), and thus tends to substantiate, rather than reduce, the probability of a common authorship. (2.) 'fThe name of Gornelis Plockhoy," Asher continued, "is not mentiomd in the £911 Zghael, and tin important Requesten and Ver- tooghen, ccntaining the fundamental Articles of the Kort Varhael Company, are all signed 3.7.2.1L'f As stated above, H.V.Z.M. was an agent for Plockhoy and his associates and, as he explained in the first address to the magistrates, wished to remain anonymous. Th does not speak of the Plockhoy group, except as his 'f‘r-Iasters, Principals, and clients.” — (3) The Plockhoy plan, stated Asher, was based on communistic principles; the Egrt Verhael "speaks nowhere of such an intention} O G. M. Asher, A Bibliggg aphical and Historical _I*_l_ssay 9_1_i_the mtg; Book; and Pamphlet; Relating tg_ New Motherland, (Amsterdam, 1868), Pp. 207-80 9 Ibgo. P. 150 137 This argument is ill-founded. The former was based on the same ideas of community organisation as the £1113 Verhael. (See Articles 50-63).10 (4) "The election of a chief," Asher argued,"_is one of the express articles of the Plockhoy-manifesto; the entirely opposite principle, that no member is to have a constitutional pre-eminence, is enounced in the M Verhaelflf Plockhoy's appeal for equality was manifest in both writings, as was the provision for a chief. Asher obviously overlooked the latter provision in the £931 Verhael, which is very eXplicit in Article 15: "Earthermore, everyone of the voting menbers will, according to his best knowledge, elect as head of the colony the one whom he considers the most prominent in ability and intelligence. The voting will be done on ballots rolled up. _ (5) Asher's final argument was that 'fthe conditions granted to Plockhoy on the 9th of June, 1662, ccntaining the engagement of the city of Amsterdam to grant free passage to the emigrants, and a hundred guilders besides to each family, are nowhere mentioned in the Kort VerhaelJf The addresses, Asher failed to remember, were written and submitted before the contract was drawn up; and refer- ence to a non—existent contract could, therefore, not have been made. Many similarities in the 17m writings substantiate a common origin. Both exclude sectarian ministers and substitute Scripture reading am psalm singing. Both strive for equality as the basis 10 39331 Verhael van Nieuw liederlant , pp. 55-57. 138 for the colony, and grant the right of appeal to the higher magis- trates. They exclude certain classes of incompatible persons, and expel members who pmve to be incompatible, after personal counsel- ing and upon a two-thirds vote. Both declare the gova'nor inel ig- ible for reelection until one year has elapsed, and warn the gova'nor that he should not be a dictator. Both contain the provi- sion for conscient ions believers in nonresistance to pay a tax in lieu of military service. The writings contain identical provisions whereby non-members may become members, the arrazgement of working in common for the first five years, a six-hour work day working unier the supervision of foreman, and of individuals making good use of their leisure time, perhaps by working a piece of land apart from that which belongs to the community. Both stress modest and practical attire. Perinps the mast remarkable similarity in the two writings is the concern for the care of the aged, sick, widows, and orphans. The ates on the writings conform to a progression of everms leading up to completion of the contract and issuance of the m 9; Q3; Optwerp, which sought to enlarge the membership prior to embarla tion. The addresses in the £931 Verhae; dated from November 22, 1661, to May 25, 1662. The contract was dated June 6, 1662, and the middle of September was He tentative date for the departure of the first contingent of settlers. The m Verhae]I was finally published in October, 1662; and about May 5, 1663, the emigrants embarked for Amer ice. The place of settlement in flew Esther land is the same in both writings, mmely, the Bor ekil, which was the west 139 bank of the mouth of the Delaware. When speaking of the I-brekil, both writings mntain the gloss, "Also called Swaanendael." It is difficllt to conceive tint two couplet ely independent pro Jects could be submitted to the magistrates of Amsterdam, both pertaining to colonimtion of the same location and time. Both writings, furtlsrmore, contain the same general organisation and philosophy, includiig the same dnique adnizture of commercial efficiency and enterprise with idealism and social concern. Not only are the ideas of both p‘onects the same but they were quite foreign to the culture of 17th century lblland. (As to style, mam expressions-- such as names and titles, the terms "socieiyfl "decisiors by a two-thirds majority]? 'fprofit by thewmmimmity,‘f--are semen to both writings. f“ h One of the most significant argument for a common origin is the notice in the second letter of the £933; Verhael to a brief and concise agreement (kort en beknopt onderlingh accoort) to be drafted in which was to be defined the non-political aspects of the project, am the subsequent appearance of Plockhoy's Qrt pp Klaer Qgtwerp. APEIIDIX B * mlITRACT BETWEEII PLOCKHOY AND THE ALSTERDAM BURGOLIASTERS Burgomasters and Magistrates of the City of Amsterdam: Because we are at all times disposed to advance this City's Colony in New Netherland, there fore have us, with the knowledge and consent of the 36 Councillors concluded to that end the following agreement with Pieter Cornelisz. Plockhoy of Zieriksee: That he, Pieter Cormliss. Plockhoy, undertakes to present to us, as soon as possible, the names of 24 men, who, with him, will make a Society of 25 persons, who will agree to depart by the first ship or ships to the aforesaid colony of this City, to reside there and to work at farming, fishing, handicraft, etc. , and to be as diligent as possible not only to live comfort— ably themselves, but also that provision may theeby be made for others to mme. The aforesaid Society of 25 male persons (more or less as they may increast or decrease) shell, for the common welfare ani for each iniividnally, take up as much land, provided it belongs to nobody else, at the Harekil (Gloss: also called Swanen-dafl or another part of the Colony, as they are willing and able to cultivate and pasture. These lands, divided and undivided, shall be the propaty of the aforesaid Society and Colonists to use in whichever way seems best. The aforesaid Colonists shall erect such rules and laws as they think proper for the peace, harmony, and welfare of the Society, with the provision tint each person who feels an injus- tice can appeal to the higher Magistrates here or there. The aforesaid Society, and each member iniividnally, shall be exempt from all tithes 3111 taxes, however they may be named, for twenty years. To the aforesaid 25 persons shall be paid in loan one hundred guilders to provide the made of each individually and also to cover the cost of transportation (the wives and children being transported at the espouse of this city according to the minted conditions). [Glossz These conditions--the 25 peop1e and 2,500 guilders on loan to buy tools and other equipment-«re only a beginning to enable the Colony to get started. We hope that the * This translation was made from the prospectus. For a translation of the contract as it was recorded in the Qrggt Llengrigg Regi spar No. 5, fol. 78, see MM gglgnial Ecuments, II, pp. 176-7. 141 Hmorable Burgomasters and the 36 Councillors will exteml their loan for the continuation of their colony in New Netherland; that is, to 100 men, 4,000 rijksdaalders, which will enable us to embark with at least 100 capable men or families (and to be better protected aginst the savages).] The aforesaid 2.5 Colonists shall bind themselves as a group to repay the aforesaid 2,500 guilders to this City, according to Articles 21 and 22 of the Coniit ions recently printed concern- ing this City's colony. If one of the 25 aforesaid persons should decide to leave the Society and return to this country, he shall be free to do 3), provided he takes only his own personal. property and leaves to the Society the undivided land, cattle, and other common property, so the other Colonists can effect the aforesaid repayment. The transportation costs of such an individual shall be paid by the Society from the common treasury as a compensation to him for his labor. And if any person should decide to move elsewhere at his own expense and retain or sell his share in the common stock, he shall be free to do so, provided he has someone to replace him, or he sells to someone whom the Society will approve and who will par- ticipate and help in the comn activities. The aforesaid Society and each member thereof shall further abide in all matters by the aforesaid printed laws, the inter- pretation of which remains the prerogative of the Burgomasters of this City. In testimony whereof, we—-the Burgomasters and Magistrates aforesaid-“affix the seal of this City to these presents, the 9th of June, 1662. Signed, Wig-bolt Slicher Registered in the @993 Memorial, Volume 5, of the City of Amsterdam. APPEEIDIX C SORET BY KAREL VERLOOVE 50m To the Supporters of the Mutual QDmPany or Settlement in 39.! Netherland upon the maxim 1:1:er taxes smmzers" While harmony, for the common welfare, is Indispensible and good, one must carefully watch That mutual love, with heart and soul and strength, Remains firm, so that the evil plague 0f discord, strife, and envy does not triumph. If you will be vigilant for this cause, you shall become A mighty people, yea the greatest of all time, And New Nether land will flourish in unity. Your intentions should spur you to such concord. Envision the symbol which once enlightened A people whose power was eXpressed by arrows. Remember the valiant lion of the Netherlands. The arrows have given rise to cities and states. Unity makes strength, and breeds rest and peace. Each plays his role. Karel Verlo ove "‘ This was the motto of the States General of the United Netherlands. The translation was ends with no regard for the meter or for the rim of the original. APPENDIX D 'fSPURRING VERSES" BY JACOB SCREEN To the lovers of the colony and brotherhood to be established on the South River of New Netherland, by :Peter Cornel ison Piockhoy of Zier ikzee, with his associates; and the favorable privileges, for that purpose, granted by the Noble brds Burgomasters of the City of Amsterdam, the 9th of June, 1662. You poor, who know not how your living to obtain; You affluent, who seek in mind to be content; Choose you New Netherland (which no one shall disdain), Before your time and strength here fruitlessly are spent. There have you other ends, your labor to incite; ’ Your work, will gen‘rous soils, with usury, requite. New Netherlands the flow'r, the noblest of all lands; With richest blessings crowned, where milk and honey flow; By the most High of All, with doubly lib'ral hands mdowed; yea, filled up full, with what may thrive and grow. The air, the earth, tln see, each pregmnt with its gift, The needy, without trouble, fmm distress to lift. The birds obscure the sky, so numerous in their flight; The animals roam wild, and flatten down the ground; The fish swarm in the waters, and exclude the light; The oysters there, than which none better can be found, Are piled up, heap on heap, till islands they attain; And vegetation clothes the forest, mead, and plain. You have a portion there which costs not pains nor gold; But if you labor give, then shall you also share (With trust in Him who you from want does there uphold) A rich reward, in time, for all your toil and care, In cattle, grain, and fruit, and every other thing; Whereby you always have great cause as praise to sing. What see you in your houses, towns, and Fatherland? Is God not over all? the heavens over wide? His blessings deck the earth, like bursting veins expand In floods of treasures o'er, wherever you abide; Which neither are to monarchies nor duke-dome bound, They are as well in one, as other country found. =8 Translated by Henry 0. Murphy, Anthglgy QL New Netherland. (New York: The Bradford Club, 1865), pp. 68-75. 144 But there, a living view does always meet your eye, Of Eden, and the promised land of Jacob's seed; Who would not, then, in such a formed community Desire to be a freeman; and the rights decreed To each and every one, by Amstel's burgher lords, T'enjoy? and treat with honor what their rule awards? Communities the groundwork are of every state; Thw first the hamlet, village and the city make. From whence proceeds the commonwealth; whose members, great Become, an int east in the common welfare take. 'Tis no Utopia; it rests on principles, Which, for true liberty, prescribes you settled rules. You will not aliens, in those far lands, appear; As formerly, in Egypt, e'en was Israel. Nor have you slavery nor tyranny to fear, Since Joseph's eyes do see, and on the compass fall. The civic Fathers who on th' I perform their labors; Are your protectors; and your countrymen are neighbors. New Netherland's South River,--seconi Amazon, For you a pleasure garden on its banks concedes. Choose you the Swannendael, where Osset had his throne,“I Or any other spot your evocation needs. You have the choice of all; and you 'rs left free to choose; Keep the condit 1018 well, and you have naught to lose. Discard the base report, unworthy of your ear; 'Tis forged by ignorance and hate and Jealous spite, By those who are its authors, to bedim this fair Bright morning sun before the laughing noonday light. in accident may hinder, but not change the plan, Whose gloss, take that away, you then may fairly scan. 'Was but an accident, which gives them stuff to slight Tint land, which, as I know, no proper rival Ins; In order from your purpose they may you affright, Who there desire to live, before you thither pass. 'Tis groundless, ev'ry one may easily perceive. Who how neglects the chance, great treasures does he leave. Jacob Steendam, noch vaster. a. The 'fo was the bay on which Amsterdam was situated. H The-stol‘y of Ossett and the 'fbase reports" spoken of in the last two stanzas comprises a tragic story. Ossett was camander of one of the first Dutch colonies in New Netherland under the patmonship of David DeVries, who led retumed to Halland. When DeVries re- turned to his colony he fo tad his houses burned and the ground strewn with the skulls and bones of his settlers. He befriended an Indian, who told him the story of the massacre. One of his men had erected a pillar, to which he affixed a tin piece having the emblem or arms of the United Netherlands. An Indian chief took a fancy to the glittering sheet and made away with it. Osset convinced the Iniian tribe that they led insulted the great Dutch nation; and to make amends tie Indians killed the chief. The kinsmen of the dead chief desired revenge. At a time when the colonists were least suspecting attack, the kinsmen descended on the village and murdered thirty-four white men. Thus the first settlement in the "valley of swans" came to an end. 145 mom us our