Ir ‘3 ABTRACT A DECRIP’I‘IVE STUDY OF TRENDS IN DRAMATIC STYLES IN THE SUCCESSFUL, SERIOUS AMERICAN DRAMA OF THE mm 311$ IN THE 1920's by Charles Everett Lauterbach The purpose of this study was to describe trends in dramatic styles in the successful, serious American dramas which were produced in the couere'ial theatres of New York during the period from 1919 to 1929- The study attunptsd to find out what the overall stylistic trends were, what styles appeared, what the dominant style of the period was, how frequently different styles were uployed, whether mutations of styles appeared in plays, and what similarities or differences were displayed in plays related to particular dramatic “7106. The study was limited to the consideration or popular]: and ”finally successful, serious plays (tragecb, drama, and melodrama) “191! were written by native or foreign dramatists for original pro- duction on the Broadway stage. A method for identifying dramatic styles was established that Profided for a consideration of the principles, general character- istics, and form slants or a style. The method was uployed to fowlate criteria for identifying eight modern dramatic styles- ROIanticism, Realism, Naturalism, Symbolism, Expressionism, Formalism, “turns, and Surrealism. The criteria for identifying dramatic styles were used to We forty-six successful, serious plays selected from the American drill of the 1920 's. The plays were selected from every third mini use: 525‘.- ""‘ “W: a: 11;: ‘M 31:324.: “4. “m5“ firm. 3'4": " 6; “41%: he: ath- § ‘iIlI Charles Everett Lauterbach theatrical season beginning with the season of 1919-1920 and ending with the season of 1928-1929. The stylistic analyses of the forty-six plays were compared and conclusions drawn. While only four of ten theatrical seasons had bean studied, it was felt that the particular conclusions reached in the investigation were reflective of the state of dramatic styles in all the seasons of the period. However, it was not claimed that all the trends in style in the serious drama of the 1920's had been discovered. 0n the basis of the data collected it was possible to make the following conclusions . 1. In regard to style, successful, serious American drama of the 1920's changed from a state of near uniformity at the beginning or the decade to a state of multirormity by 1929. 2. Successful, serious plays were written in four dramatic styles: Romanticism, Realism, Expressionism, and Naturalism. 3. Symbolism, Formalism, Futurism, and Surrealism either did Mt appear in the theatrical seasons covered in this study or they We not adopted by American playwrights who wrote successful, serious Grin. 1;. Romanticism was the dominant style of successful, serious herican plays in the 1920's. Realism was the second most prevalent Style in the decade. Expressionism and Naturalism were minor “711st“ movuuts. 5. A trend toward electricism was evidmt in the styles of l”Elms dram in the 1920's. I} 6. Shiuitiw “Ila varied u... - my: - .-. Ln: “'4 m ii : “We”. t: “Ill, m m an e 'd '5‘” the ‘1 '13,;- u ‘6‘ ; L39: 5. Charles Everett Lauterbach 6. Similarities and differences among plays related to particu- lar styles varied according to the styles. Romantic plays tended to be divided into two different groups, but the plays in each group were inclined to be similar. Plays associated with Realism were simi- lar in style, but some were oriented toward the element of character and others toward the elussnt of theme. Plays related to Expression- iel tmded to differ from each other. Dramas related to the style of Naturalism were quite similar to each other. 7. While Realism was not the dominant style of the period, it was a very major influence on other styles. 8. Realism was the dominant style of critically successful drums. Romnticism was the dominant style of popularly successful Grease. Expressionim and Naturalism were not generally accepted by the theatre audiences of the period. - (: it In,- 6:)c0Ernuyh 1967 Mommas EVERETT A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY OF TREES IN DRAMATIC STYLES IN THE SUCCESSFUL, SMOKE AMERICAN DRAMA OF THE EIOADWAI STACE IN THE 1920 '8 By Charles Everett Lauterbach ATKESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirments for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHMOPHI Department of Speech 1966 ACKNOWLED CMENTS The writer wishes to acknowledge the help and thought of Mr. John E. Clifford and Mr. Anthorw L. Kadlec who contributed to the “1'11 planning and research of this study which was originally M of a Joint project to describe stylistic trends in the Ameri- “n drua from 1919 to the presalt. The writer also wishes to encpress gratitude to Dr. John A. Weite of the Department of English, Dr. Colby Lewis of the Department of Radio and Television, Dr. E. c. Reynolds of the Want of Speech, and Dr. John E. Dietrich, fomer head of the DMmt of Speech, for serving on the Guidance Couittee of “‘18 stuck. A special note of thanks is due to Dr. James R. Brandon 0: the Department of Speech for his patimce and understanding as “‘9 author's maJor adviser. Above all, the writer would like to thank his wife for her “Shrifice and aid which contributed so much to the completion of “‘1. study. “BEER t E! l.’ D C ’ O h 1 [I E.“ .‘ ‘1 f7 (7 // TABLE OF CONTENTS Ammm O 0 O O O 0 O O O O O 0 0 O 0 Chapter I moulm O O O O O O O O 0 O O 0 II DRAMATIC 8m: DEFINITION, METHODOLOGY, AND APPLICATION . . . ROMANTICISH . . . . . . . . . . . . . WISH O O O I O O O O O O O O O O 0 mm 0 O O O O O O O O O O O 0 III Iv v VII 3011531me.”... 11 O O O O O O O O O O O 0 W11, manna, AND 3033mm: II THE mu THEATRICAL SEASQI or 1919—1920 . .1 THE EROADHAI'THEATRICAL SEMSON'OT l922e1923 . 1:1 THE momma THEATRICAL SEASON or 1925-1926 . xII THE mm: THEATRICAL SEASON or 1923-1929 . m:alnocmmu Page ii 26 61 103 129 163 17h 275 £15 #31 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 4- During the third decade of the twentieth century, American theatre audiences witnessed the early plays of such renowned native dramatists as Eugme O'Neill, Sidney Howard, Robert Sherwood, Elmer Rice, Harwell Anderson, and John Howard Lawson. Broadway welcomed movations from European drama and theatre. The "New Stagecraft" mad. scene desigl an imortant factor in American theatre. By 1928, the number of theatres in New Iork rose to eighty. "Without a doubt th. twenties proved that the American drama had achieved its mjority."l The flowering of American drama in the twenties was mrked by the a”Durance of a variety of newly imported dramatic styles. American N, along with the dram of other nations, "became more fully aware or style than it had heal for cmturies."2 While most innovations in Nth style began abroad, '"many of the most able and characteristic q‘Vdomts of particular dramatic styles" came "from the western a“hares of the Atlantic."3 \ _ lAllardyce Nieoll, "United States of America," W M, ed. Phyllis Hartnoll (2d ed., London: Oxford QiVersity Press, 1957 pp. 812-813. '1' zJohn Gassner, Th t s (New York: Crown bliahwa, Ince, 1951a , pe 7e 3Allardyce Nicoll, World Drfl (New York: Harcourt, Brace, and C ° ‘ . 191.9). p- 759. 2 The involvemmt of American playwrights of the 1920 's in various experimmts in dramatic style has been noted in general terms on numerous occasions. Yet investigations of this involvanent are needed to render more precise observations on the appearance and development of stylistic movnmts in the American drama of the period. This thesis is one contribution toward fulfilling that end. S tenant o ose The purpose of this study is to describe the trends of modern Cll‘anlatic styles in successful serious American plays produced on the meessional New York stage between 1919 and 1929. The results of the “W answer such questions as: 1. What were the overall stylistic trends of the period? What Styles were exhibited in the dramas of this period? 2. Has there a dominant dramatic style in the 1920's? How frequently were different styles anployed? 3. Did dramas of the 1920 '3 contain combinations of dramatic at"lee? 1.. What were the similarities in plays related to particular qhfilhatic styles? What were the differences? Definitions Before going into the content of this study, some terms which are 11. ‘d in special ways require definition. "Trad" is here used as the bl“Vrs.:1.2l.ing tendmcy or inclination. 'Hodern dramatic styles" are t hQBe ways or manners of writing a play which are customarily labelled O 3 as Realism, Naturalism, Symbolism, etc.‘ "Successful" in the context of this study describes drama which were either commercial and/or critical successes. A play is considered to be a commercial success when its length of run was over one hundred performances.5 A play is considered to be a critical success if, (1) it was judged by its reviewers at the time of its original production to be a worth- while play; (2) it was singled out as a play of merit in the years fonowing its production in the commtary of drama critics or hilstoz‘ians; (3) it was anthologized; or (1.) it received recognition ”.7 winning any major drama awards. "Serious" includes the dramatic 1"7130!! of tragedy, drama, and melodrama. "American plays" are those "with were written W for the American theatre by either native or foreign authors. "Professional New York stage" is a term “30d to describe the comercial theatres of New York City which produce Limitations This study is exclusively a descriptive study seeking to deter- ‘11:, the trade in dramtic styles in the American drama of the 1920's. It is not an attulpt at a complete history of dramatic styles of the \ 0 “See Chapter II for a more complete explanation and definition r Style. A 5111 the Burns Hantle Best PM series for the 1920 's , a production of one hundred performances is the standard for determining whether 0 b not a play is a commercial success. (The decision as to whether a play was produced professionally is §°d on the information included in the statistical smaries of NM seasons found in the appropriate editions of the Burns Mantle M series. L (P —[ ll Eula, hilt; W I. V I die: g. :4 azvm (I ' “he“: i in ““‘m n::el yrs-J. I w ‘ - “3 5‘3: 1 he ~ 3 as Realism, Naturalism, Symbolism, etc.“ "Successful" in the context of this study describes dramas which were either commercial and/or critical successes. A play is considered to be a commercial success when its length of run was over one hundred performances.5 A play is considered to be a critical success if, (1) it was judged by its reviewers at the time of its original production to be a worth- while play; (2) it was singled out as a play of merit in the years following its production in the commtary of drama critics or historians; (3) it was anthologized; or (1.) it received recognition by winning any major drama awards. "Serious" includes the dramatic types of tragedy, drama, and melodrama. "American plays" are those which were written W for the American theatre by either native or foreign authors. ”Professional New York stage" is a term used to describe the comercial theatres of New York City which produce Fla-YB for profit.6 Limitations This study is exclusively a descriptive study seeking to deter- mine the trade in dramatic styles in the American drama of the 1920's. It is not an attupt at a complete history of dramatic styles of the ‘ I‘See Chapter II for a more complete explanation and definition Of Style. 5111 the Burns Hantle Best Play series for the 1920 's , a production run of one hundred perfomances is the standard for determining whether 01‘ not a play is a comercial success. é'I'he decision as to whether a play was produced professionally is based on the intonation included in the statistical sunrise of seasons found in the appropriate editions of the Burns Mantle M series. u, 5:: does it 2:! :eiua :: the tin. pain a: Native. 3:31;}, £1511.- uni . «1 Men c2: ._.u\ .t. “”5” km 31% ll 'III“. ."wn “en 3 m 5.. f: mm" .m tn the N “this. "» A. period, nor does it try to explain the causes and effects of style in the drama of the time. The study is descriptive, rather than inter- pretive or evaluative. Secondly, although there are four areas of theatre which can be discussed in terms of style (direction, playscript, scenery, and acting), this study is limited to the consideration of playscripts only. Thirdly, this study deals only with plays written originally for production on the New York stage for the particular years under «rumination. This excludes plays from abroad, translations or adapta- tions of foreign plays, and revivals from past seasons of American drama. The majority of sources consulted for this study are from the broad area of drama and theatre. Historical, literary, and artistic sources are «alloyed only when applicable or germane to discussions. W This investigation of the stylistic develOpment in the American dram of the 1920's is significant for two reasons. First of all, dramatic styles in thuselves constitute a major area of importance in the criticism and discussion of drama. Second, the period under in- '°8tigation is an important decade in the development of a truly Alerican drama. The concern with dramatic style, while not original with the twentieth century, is of particular importance in modern drama. Haskell a. Block and Robert a. Shedd, in their anthology, Masters o; W, contend that, "although such tems as naturalism and B“holiest, realism and theatricalism, are often artificial, we met l“marlin the distinctive qualities of these and other movunaits if we are to understand modern drama."7 As for the importance of the 1920 's in the history of American drama, John Mason Brown describes it this way: It was not puberty but maturity that the American theatre achieved . . . , during the years which followed World War I and preceded the Depression . . . . The twenties were good days in the American theatre.8 He cites the influx of "noteworthy European plays," the scripts of "a new gmeration of . . . native dramatists," and the "aesthetic revolt" of dramatic artists as examples of "mmorable moments" in the drama and theatre of the 1920's.9 Similar points of view are expressed by Barrett H. Clark,10 Joseph Wood Krutch,ll and Allardyce Nicoll.12 This study has three distinctive features. The first is the use of a consistent, systematic method to describe dramatic styles. Such a method is lacking in previously written works, or is not uployed to deal with a number of styles. Many books deal with the subject of dramatic style, usually only as a part of a wider field of investiga- tion. In such books the manner of describing styles generally consists 0f the selection of a fat striking characteristics firm a number of ‘_ 7Hsskell H. Block, Robert G. Shedd, eds., Mastgs o; the Mg m (New York: Random House, Inc., 1962), p. 3. 8John Hason Brain, W (New York: The Viking Press, 1963), pe 3e ide, pe 8e loBarrett H. Clark, "The United States," A 11 etc 0 Mod Rag, ed. Barrett [-1. Clark and George Freedley (lieu1 " fork: ':i D. A'Jppll: E!eton- c-ntury co., 191.7). 1» 654- 11Joseph Wood Krutch, The Amer Since 1 18 (New York: George Braeiller, Inc., 1957 , pp. 10-25. 1"aillardyce Nicoll, W (New York: Harcourt, Brace, and ‘20-. 191.9). 1:. 759. 6 exuplary plays . This approach to stylistic description is operative ' in such recognised works as John Gassner's {cm and Idea 35' 14on Thgtren and nordeeel Gorelik's New Theatres {or Old-1“ This approach, while it may serve to identity individual styles, does not often clearly reveal the interrelationships among the elements which appear in the differing styles. In brief, no consistent or systematic manner of description is applied throughout such books. A few works -- The M o; the m by Fred Hillett and Gerald Bentley,” Theodore Hatlal's Orimgtion to the Thgtre,l6 and Oscar Brockett's The Tthe: g Qtroductionl'z—do unpley consistent approaches to style descriptions. However, the first book merely groups observations about the elualts of particular styles under a single heading of "quality" and does not display any consistalcy of description within this heading. In his book, Hatlm presents an organised and consistent approach to dealing with styles, but only includes three styles - Realism, Naturalism, and Expressionism. In the third book, The Theatre; An Introduction, Hr. Brockett covers mam dramatic styles in a consistent manner, but confines his descriptions to the analysis of a single eat-Iplary drama. _~ BJohn Gassner, o in H Theat s (New York: The Dryden Press, Inc. , 195 . “Mordecai Gorelik, Egg Eggtges (or 91d (New York: Samuel ““1611, 19m). 15mm B. Millett and Gerald Eades Bentley, o e Dr (New Iork: D. Appleton-Cmtury 00., 1935). 16Theodore a. Hatlen, Ori tat o to Th t e (New Tor-k: AFilleton-C: entury-Crofts , 1962 . 170eoer G. sroekett, The Theatre An Introduction (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston—fl c., 61.7. _1 139cm 11:11: "'5”: $2611 criti he :: 95:11:“ - - 537.! an ”9118‘. ftl 2! “N e h... .4 inn 3.“. . ”get; . "cup-a” “:0: .H‘ _ ° "' and. ‘2“ dis.““' h. nl‘u .. I. .szt’ “‘5 ’Qf‘esnt e,- , a Her e mt}: '15. t» ‘t. n ‘ ' b 3 *3?“ a \‘I K \" a fi 5 5' r ‘5‘“ a. v. I ‘ N Q 7 A second distinctive feature of this study is the attempt to reflect general critical opinions concerning the elements and attri- butes of particular dramatic styles. The criteria for identifying styles are compiled from a large number of sources which pertain to the field of drama and consequently presmt general opinions of what constitutes particular dramatic styles. A third distinctive feature is an objective, systematic manner of selecting representative plays which takes into account both comercially and critically successful dramas. This process avoids personal, subjective selection of plays and presents a more accurate picture of given theatrical seasons in regard to their important plays. This is in contrast to two comon practices of selecting plays to represent the development of American drama in the 1920 's. One is the citation of enduring, quality dramas as symptomatic of the growth or drama, a practice which leads to the distortion of conditions as they actually were. The other is equally distortive and relies on the Perfomnce records of plays as an indication of achievement in the Mb of drama. This study unites both approaches to treat quali- tative and quantitative aspects of success in the drama of the United Statue Desi 0 St Briefly, the design of this study consists of four parts. The first part covers two aspects: establishment of a method for con- aintent stylistic description and selection of the styles treated in this study (Chapter II). The second part establishes criteria for classifying eight dramatic styles (Chapters III-VIII) . In the third PM. selected groups of plays from the 1920's are compared to the 8 criteria in order to determine the styles of the plays (Chapters IX- XII). Then conclusions are drawn regarding the trends in modern dramatic styles in the serious American drama of the 1920's (Chapter 1111). Criteria for establishing descriptions of dramatic styles were developed in the following manner. Information from books and articles pertaining to the drama and theatre was (compared in order to determine generally accepted views on the traits of particular dramatic styles. These views were then presented in a form devised for this stuw which includes the principles on which a style is based, the general charac- teristics of a style, and the use of stylistic form elements associated with drama (plot, character, etc.). When there was a difference of opinion about what constituted a stylistic trait or when information was lacking in printed sources, additional cementary concerning particular aspects was supplied by the author of this study. The plays from the American draw. of the 1920's were selected in the following it“: every third theatrical season, beginning with 1919-1920, was selected for stuiy. This selection of every third “Mon was done for two reasons. First, tralds "do not make thmselves felt in a single season."18 Second, it was inpractical to locate, read, "id analyze all of the hundreds of serious plays produced in the pro- fessional theatre of the 1920's. The theatrical seasons selected for this study were those of 1919-1920, 1922-1923, 1925-1926, and 1928— 1.929. Each season is treated in a separate chapter (IX-XII). Next, uploying the infomtion included in the films Mantle My editions for the selected theatrical seasons, a list of 1801311“ pe 678s 9 forty-six serious American plays and their lengths of production was drawn up. All plays which ran over one hundred performances were chosen for stylistic analysis. Any serious play which ran less than one hundred but more than fifty performances whose reviews at the time of its opening considered it to be artistically successful, was also included. Any play which ran less than one hundred performances but was afterward successfully revived or later anthologised, or in an other manner singled out as a worthwhile play, was also included. The forty-six successful serious American plays which were shoes: by this selective process were analyzed to determine their gmeral characteristics and form elements of style. These analyses were compared to the criteria established herein for describing the various dramatic styles in order to identify the style of the plays. From such a determination, each theatrical season was summarised, indicating the conditions regarding the dramatic styles. in that season. When all four seasons had bem treated in this manner, they were com- pared to one another, and conclusions about stylistic trends in American drama of the 1933'- were drawn. mas Primary sources deployed in this study consist of forty-six plays lelected from the period of 1919 through 1929. Of these, thirty have but published and the reminder are in manuscript form.19 In addi- tion, some use was made of essays, prefaces, and nanifestoes by k 19Two plays were never located in either published or manuscript fore. Rather than «elude th- entirely, an sttaspt was made to l‘Otu'eate their basic stylistic traits from secondary sources such as "View and the material contained in Best PM editions. 10 playwrights and leaders of stylistic movements. A number of secondary sources were employed in this study. The Burns Mantle editions of Best Plays from 1919 to 1929 were used for information on plays produced in a given year, including length of run, type, author, and other pertinent data. Books, journals, and magazines devoted primarily to the fields of drama and theatre were used in the developmmt of criteria for describing dramatic styles. Sections of mcyclOpedias, dictionaries, and literary histories were used when the information contained in thu had some bearing on the stylistic aspect of dram. Non-dramatic sources which were cited or reconnended by authors in the field of drama and theatre were referred to for this study. uglish or hglish translations were used exclusively. CHAPTER II DRAMATIC STYLES: DEFINITIW , METHODOIDGI , AND APPLICATION The purpose of this chapter is to define "style" as it is used in this study, to explain the method anployed for describing dramatic styles, and to list those styles which will. be considered in this study. Def-igtion 0; Style For purposes of this study, style in drama is defined as a characteristic or distinctive way, manner, or mode of selecting, arranging, and anphasiaing the elements of dramatic construction which is peculiar to a play or group of plays and which at the same time distinguishes it or than from other plays. This is in no way a final or absolute definition, but serves only to identify the meaning of Ityle seemed in subsequmt discussions. The above definition was arrived at by comparing a number of dOIinitions of style found in gmeral references, art histories, books 011 aesthetics, and works pertaining to drama. As such it is in funds-- lmtal agreqamt with generally accepted concepts of style. Among the dfitinitions consulted are the following: WW defines the word "style" “I it pertains to aesthetics as "a quality that gives distinctive .Wallace to something (as artistic expression) and that consists esp. ll 12 in the appropriateness and choice of elements (as subject, medium, form) combined and the individualism imparted by the method of com- bining." Hiram Hoderwell in The Theatre of Today describes style in drama as a ”humor of executing a work of art, as contrasted with the work itself."1 The art historian, Janson, writes that "style means the partic- ular way in which the forms that make up any given work of art are 2 chose: and fitted together." In The Ms M Their Interrglations, Thomas Munro states that "a style is a distinctive or characteristic mode of presentation, con- struction or expression in art."3 Oscar Brockett contends that style is a quality which results from a characteristic mode of expression or method of presentation and "may be applied to the dramatic expression of a period, a nation, a movment, or an author."“ Finally, the Molongg o; the Ms says, "Starting with . . . the figurative smse, style means those characteristics of foul which are peculiar to a certain work or a group of works and which at the ‘——— lHiram Kelley Hoderwell, The Theatre 0: TM (New York: John Ina-“0 Co., 19“), pe 118. 2H. W. Janson, Histggz of £2 (New Iork: Harry N. Abrams, Inc., 1962): P' 36' 3Thonss Munro, he s and Th tic s (New York: The Liberal Arts Press, 191.9 , p. 379. “Brackets, p. M- 5a: til 1131me "i tiara: fantastic we: Liz's m incl": 331:1; 0' e . m “J If . am 0:31.11“ H?“ . .4 k1cit.’. .‘Vn C. tile . ‘;"!?Egj «L‘QN 2 ’2’ V 5;“. be t ‘1" \ E3198 1 .‘9 .’ V) k? I (a; I . wk ' ”'2 an Q "Q: 13 same time distinguish it or thu from other works."5 Canon el-amts found in these definitions of style are: a characteristic manner of executing a work of art, that forms or eluents are involved in determining the manner of expression, and that works of art may be grouped according to their styles. The definition of style adOpted for this study attenpts to include these gmerally accepted ideas . A Method for Describing aggtic Styles The investigation of style in drama does not materially differ firon investigation of style in any other art. The basis of all such investigations is dependent on a constancy in. art whereby "direct acquaintance with an unanalyaed work of art will often permit us to recognize another object of the same origin, just as we recognize a face to be native or foreign."6 The constancy in art may make possible the recognition of stylistic similarities in works of art, but "the single name given to the style 'of a period rarely corresponds to a clear and universally accepted characterization of a type."7 Furthermore, "styles are not usually defined in a strictly logi- cal way" since their "characteristics . . . vary constantly and resist a systuatic classification into perfectly distinct groups."8 Sum J. Scum. "Style" W .a. Dagobert D. Runes and Harry G. Schrickel New York: Philosophical Library, 191:6). Do 971» 6Meyer Schapiro, "Style," A Book 0 Estheti s, ed. Melvin Rader (3rd ed.; New York: Holt, Binehart, and Uinston, Inc., 1960), p. 338. 7mm- 8mm- . gig}. prints '1: rat: 1: be £19253? {251.3122} in Au 3W9 I: W 59:11:: magazine a: 4:5..- “5:311" lathe: I'm" 519! past. are, 0!- inn: *3“- u mat: 1:: :2“ W1 cents minim. 3‘- hrie: Lg, \ E-s, 1;; '9 "er-aft In»; . ‘MC it: dad 1'4 £38313“ c, 11, Although perfection in the description and classification of styles appears to be impossible, "limits are sometimes fixed by convention for simplicity in dealing with historical problus or in isolating a type."9 In this section this study fixes limits by convention for the investigation of dramatic styles. Since no standard manner for such investigation exists, it has been necessary to develop and organize a descriptive method which is applicable to dramatic styles. This method makes possible an orderly and systematic presmtation of the cmtary on dramatic styles found in writtm sources pertaining to the drama. As such, the method provides a framework for presenting the ideas and concepts of dramatic styles as expressed by drama critics and scholars. In brief the framework is divided into three parts: (1) princi- ples, the over-all ideas upon which a style is based and which determine its deveIOpment: (2) general characteristics, the qualities and impressions of a style which are appaer when a play is con- sidered as a whole; and (3) fona elements, the treatment of the parts of a play (plot, character, language, and these) which make up the whole. Principles of Style Styles do not arise arbitrarily. They develop or change accord- ing to corresponding developents or changes in the philosophies, attitudes, and conditions of either the culture in which they appear or the art form of which they are a part. 9924. 7mm limo ‘ ire-1m, but pa its: a: thug: rims, and sci: ham 1. lee-.9 lc altar: at I mist, . . . , minim am i nzrfi | ~99! mi. .ad 1:. t: h sue 5am: r; “’33 iramtic s‘. *1” M m: "a: .113: °f '1“, in: Viilm' a. 1.! 1‘3 l o o o . I rah: c: the ‘L .a r Hdngre' initial 1:“ 11w .. " x .' 5‘4 15 Thomas Munro writes that "trade in artistic styles are never indepmdent, but parts of still larger cultural trmds embracing all forms of thought and behavior: social, political, economic, religious, and scientific."10 A similar view is expressed by Theodore M. Greene when he states, Mo culture or society, . . . , is static, and no individual artist, . . . , is insane to cultural and social influences. Societies and individuals alike are continually undergoing internal change, . . . . These changes infiutlook are reflected in the usergence of new styles. The same general view is voiced in connection with the more limited area of dramatic style by John Gassner. In Mucgg the Play he points out that "different styles arose in response to different points of view, intentions, and conditions."12 He amends on this statamt in [on m g3 in the M9932 Thgtre when he writes . . . . Irelatethe forms ofmoderndramato certain "ideas of the theatre" -— that is, to certain conceptions of theatrical art and certain annotations from it. By "idea" I do not mean subject matter, but the view of theatre apparmt in the play . . . . , and the special esthetic aim pursued in the work . . . . It is oftm difficult to distinguish betwem and artist's view of theatre and his view of life, society, politics or religion . . '. . Hevertheless, I employ ”idea" to mean something larger than mere topic or opinion, I use the term to denote some specific way of conceiving the nature and use of theatre, which in turn helps to determine dramatic form and stage presentation.)-3 Prom these stat-nuts it can be seen that style is depmdent loMunro, p. 339. llTheodore Meyer Greene, Th e d e Art 0 C i ic (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 191.0 s P. 383. ”John masher, c the P (revised ed.3 New Iork: Th. Dada Prua, Ines, 1953 , pe 53e 13588311“: MW 3 P- 1t- ““133 a: the 3 L‘ie. 16 upon and reflective of the outlooks, views, conditions, or ideas of its mvironnent, whether it be that of the total culture or the more limited one of an art form such as drama. The dependence of style on underlying cultural or aesthetic principles can be seen, for maple, in the drama of ancimt Greece. Here the dramatic style was influ- mced by the religious and philosophical concepts of the Athenian society. The idea that man's fate was predetermined, an intrinsic part of Greek religious belief, was reflected in the drama of the period. The unified structure of the plot, the consistency of charac- ter, and the regularity of the poetic dialogue can also be viewed as atmsions of the Greek cultural ideals of proportion, harmony, and order. In light of the above observations, it is deemed reasonable to begin the discussion of particular dramatic styles with a considera- tion of the ideas, points of view, or philosophical attitudes upon which the styles are based. For the sake, of convmience, the word ”principle" is used as a heading for this portion of style descrip- tion and is understood to be a general term encompassing the various concepts of idea, world-view, philosophy, attitude, and point of view. Characteristics of Style Although a knowledge of the principles underlying a style.‘ is helpful in understanding its developnmt, the 83m gentiggtiog or gaggiption of a style dgpends on an mum of its character- m. In this study the characteristics of dramatic styles are separated into two groups, general characteristics and fem elements. This division into two groups is prompted by the rmrks of Meyer Schapiro, Professor of Art History at Columbia University, in 43113551" 1:: L's 159:: is 3: e' 3:531:33: :3 : :rzim, 2cm re "0 m-‘Ju - . "1“...” (1.28 1 is 55:1, :35 9;ng I fm‘ - "ul. ‘2‘: at ‘ .V.. e ”I" ‘h : _ “'3‘";- .255 Pt: 17 his comprehensive essay on style and its description. He says that, while there is no established system for describing style, "in general the description of style refers to three aspects of art: form elanents or motives, form relationships, and qualities (including an over-aall quality which we may call 'expression')."lh He believes these aspects to be the broadest, most stable, and most reliable bases for style description.” Two of the aspects of art mentioned by Schapiro are covered in this study under the title of general characteristics. These aSpects are qualities (including emression) and fem relationships. The third aspect, form elments, is treated under the title of form elements. Gongs; Chagacteristics Although Schapiro lists form elanents first, and deans then quite important, he does not feel that a description of form elements alone is sufficient for delineating a style. He contends, "In order to dis- tinguish . . . styles one must also look for features of another order and, above all, for different ways of combining thu."16 He points out that the eluents which mks up a style "seen to be marked by the ex- pression of the whole, or that there is 'a dominant feature to which the elanents are adapted."2L7 It is these "features of another order," "the expression of the whole," and "dominant features ," together with the previously mentioned qualities and form relationships, which are the general characteristics of a style. thCthil‘O, P0 3380 15M. “an. 1» 339. "an" p. 31.2. P3? ”1': ‘ 12531:! x; be 3: 2:: net-Lil express Lit: r33. deli-a1: £743.75: "11:2: .3512, cistccra‘. 22.211335 of 3c :24 infinite c1 mic 2:31;: 11:11: 3171. was his: 1m : x1: kit-:4 I Style 2:19:35: 0! the F knit ‘1: ‘1‘ .. we y‘_t C2 0: _ n. nth“ “flute Q‘ th. 5 18 For maple, the historic dramatic style of French Neo- Classicism may be said to have an austere and artificial quality. Its over-all expression can be described as one of reason and/or ration- ality with dominant features of decorum, elevation, and dignity. It displays a relationship of form elements in combining poetic ex- pression, aristocratic characters, and a simple plot which adheres to the unities of action, time and place. This very relationship aids in the projection of the qualities of austerity and artificiality. Another maple of form relationship as a characteristic of dramatic style appears in the various uses of the soliloquy in drama. The fact that a soliloquy appears in a play is not as significant in identifying a style as is the particular relation the soliloqw has to the rest of the play. A soliloquy can be "constructive" in ex- plaining the plot or relating off-stage events, or "reflective" in revealing a character's thoughts and feelings .18 In both instances the relation of the soliloqw to the structure of the play is more significant for determining the style of the play than the mere appearance of the soliloquy itself. In sumary, the general characteristics of dramatic style are described as qualities, expressions, dominant features, and fans re- lationships. They are the over-all impressions of the style arising from the view of the play as a whole. W The most readily idntifiable aspects of a style are those of its form el-ents. In drama these form eluents are gmerally “Guam-r. W . p- 171. said to b: thi! m gist, chums: tau, only tho (i: inflation c: d xix-gs an ism: me its print-3. 25 21:03:” diffi: l. U is 2 *fi 531‘ include: 1 m, “Midas, 2' Czarazter it“ 3"?! out t. {Inim’ .5114} 3’ LAT-Tan \ “ “fission. 18' A Vim cf the t Ens 13 a. . '41:“. In a: be "#955 v 0i ‘11 thc‘h‘.‘ 19 accepted to be those described by Aristotle in his Poetics. They are plot, character, language, theme, music, and spectacle}9 Of these, only the first four are included in the criteria for the identification of dramatic styles. Music is excluded because it "is no longer an invariable part of drama.“20 Spectacle is also concluded because its primary means of realization is in theatre production and is therefore difficult to discuss in terms of dramatic literature. 1. 119; is the structuring or patterning of the events of the play and includes such aspects as content, action, conflict, point of attack, exposition, climax, and resolution. 2. Chgactg is a term for the persons who appear in the drama and who carry out the dramatic action of the plot. The term includes the plwsical, mental, social, and moral aspects of these people. 3. W is the dialogue spoken by the characters. It in- parts information, reveals character, and directs attention to the developmt of the plot. 1.. M is the over-all meaning and significance of the action of a drama. Its aspects also include the ideas, argummts, and thoughts expressed in thoughts expressed in the play. A 1 tie The method of describing dramatic styles discussed in preceding paragraphs is applied in this study to eight modern dramatic styles - l9Aristotle, ”The Poetics," sto e's Theo o Poet L11, ed. 5. H. Butcher (New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1951;, pp. 23-25. The word "these” has been substituted for "thought" which is a canon translation of the Greek word for Aristotle's dramatic elumt. "Thule" and "thought" roughly connote the same concept, but "thus" some to be more widely used in modern dramatic criticism. ”Brocke‘tt, p. 26. main, 50:11 mm, and 52:: is so may; in by critic mice! to be firm: in the minis, Rea; x. _ @590, for I 733.5% Press, 113:3: 561L181 71am and 3,: “3.5004th '3 A‘élemd 3 Iii“ r5311: Ecru 20 Romanticism, Realism, Naturalism, Symbolism, Expressionism, Formalisn, Futurin, and Surrealism. This selection is based on the fact that they are recognised as being significant dramatic styles in modern drama by critics and comentators.21 While these dramatic styles are considered to be of equal importance to this study, there must be some difference in the manor of discussing them in subsequent chapters. Romanticism, Realism, Naturalism,22 Symbolism, and Expressionism are 21$», for example, John Gassner, Produging the Play (New York: The Drydu: Press, Inc. , 1953); Mordecai Gorelik, New Thgtres for Old (New York: Samel French, 191.0); Oscar Brockett, The Theatre: An gtgoduction (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc., 196A}; Fred B. Millett and Gerald Eades Bentley, The m of the Drama (New York: D. Appleton-Century 00., 1935): Edward A. Wright, A Primer or P .- 3933 (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1958); Kenneth Thorp Rowe A Theatre in Your Head (New York: Funk and Hagnalls 00., 1960 3 H. D. Albright, William P. Halstead, Lee Mitchell, Principles of Theatre Art (New York: Houghton Mifflin 60., 1955); Haskell M. Block, Robert G. Shedd, eds. Masters of the Modgg Drama (New York: Random House, Inc. , 1962); and Allardyce Nicoll, W (New York: Harcourt, Brace, and 00., 191.9). 22The inclusion of' Naturalism as a major dramatic style requires some clarification. An enaminat ion of twentieth century dramatic commentary reveals two distinct theories concerning Naturalism as a dramatic style. One theory is that Naturalism is only a heightaied and intensified form of Realism, and not a separate, distinguishable style. The second theory postulates that Naturalism is a distinct style by virtue of Zola's so-called "sciatific determinism." Typical of the first group, those who believe that Naturalism "is an extrae form of realimn," is John Gassner (Producing the Play, p. 62)- According to him, Realism is the general style "developed by the militant champions of Realism" (kgsyg of the Theatre: M Henrik Ibsu: to mm egg [revised ed., New York: Simon and Schuster, 1950 pd. . He indicates that environment is a determining factor in the idea of Naturalism (flog and Idg . . . 3 , pp. 66-67). To him this is not sufficient reason to distinguish Naturalism from Realism, since one of his criteria for Realism is also that environ- mt and heredity are determinate factors in the formation of charac- ter. As a result his logical position is that Naturalism (as an adjunct of Realism) sigxifies only "a strict, often extras, mode of Realism . . . andarathernarrowdogma introduced . . . byEmile 201‘ (Me, pe 67)e The opposing view, that Naturalism in drama can be said to be distinct from Realism, specs in part with the Gassner view. The ear-11:19. “933' N33: mi Sunni 2:: m mosni‘d ‘ m by critics and mice to b. c! ' :‘iffrete in £110 '35 Midi, lull-‘3. __ A . . .'”’ for GIL“, aims Press, Inc. isle-k: Eamel he: antenna (in Icr: w w _— r5." ‘ . Earn: \7'5-3 (56V Icr‘x: ‘. 4 3: .nclusion firumn. 1. -. 5.. rev :‘ .0. mm. (Cu . *l. ‘Cm ; c 20 Romanticism, Realism, Naturalism, Symbolism, Expressionism, Formalism, Futurism, and Surrealism. This selection is based on the fact that they are recognised as being significant dramatic styles in modern drama by critics and c0n.sntat0rs.21 While these dramatic styles are considered to be of equal importance to this study, there must be some differ-«ice in the newer of discussing them in subseqth chapters. Romanticism, Realism, Naturalism,22 Symbolism, and Expressionism are 2'15”, for «ample, John Gassner, Producing the Play (New York: The Dryden Press, Inc. , 1953): Mordecai Gorelik, New Theatres {0; Old (New York: Samuel French, 1910); Oscar Brockett, The Theatre: An M21122 (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc., 1961.5; Fred B. Hillett and Gerald Eades Bentley, Thg m 0: the Drama (New York: a. Appleton-Century ed., 1935); Edward A. Wright, A Primer or P .- m (Inglewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1958 ; Kenneth Thorp Rowe A Theatre in Your Head (New York: Funk and “Snails 00., 19605: H. D. Albright, William P. Halstead, Lee Mitchell, Prgcigles of Theatre Art (New York: Houghton Hifflin 00., 1955); Haskell x.- Block, Robert G. Shedd, eds. Masters o; the godern (New York: Random House, Inc., 1962) 3 and Allardyce Nicoll, D (New York: Harcourt, Brace, and 00., l9h9). 22The inclusion of‘ Naturalism as a major dramatic style requires “‘0 Clarification. An mination of twmtieth cmtury dramatic ”unitary reveals two distinct theories concerning Naturalism as a dramatic style. One theory is that Naturalism is only a heightened intensified form of Realism, and not a separate, distinguishable “110. The second theory postulates that Naturalism is a distinct “’10 by virtue of Zola's so-called "scientific determinism." ,, Typical of the first group, those who believe that Naturalism 1‘ in «true form of realism," is John Gassner (Producing the Play, p. 62). According to him, Realism is the gmeral style "developed 1” the militant champions of Realism" (Igeam of the Thgtre: £r_0_a_i ”mu Ibsen to bar a Eevieed ed., New York: Simon and 3°h‘18ter, 19507 13.1.). He indicates that environment is a determining t‘ctor in th‘ id“ or natural“ (EOE fig Idg e e e g ' ppe 66-67)e T° him this is not sufficient reason to distinguish Naturalism fmm Ruin, since one of his criteria for Realism is also that mviron- ‘nt and heredity are determinate factors in the formation of charac- t‘r- As a result his logical position is that Naturalism (as an ad.‘hlnct of Realism) signifies only "a strict, often «trans, mode of IiGalina. . .andarathernarrowdogmaintroduced. . .hynniie 201. (mee, pe 67)e The opposing view, that Naturalism in drama can be said to be mullet from Realism, agrees in part with the Gassner view. The ml: at in separate areas: in discuss £722}. This iffere. grid“; by i pract its he: hits: styles is has of the seine-i '59! L1 fiscusssd in it! :rlterii for styli ”37'! '3: critical 0 r”: “39-11417 on m“! 03 P: mali: “Ed’ their 0136115 5, 21 dealt with in separate chapters (III-VII). Fomalism, Futurism, and Surrealism are discussed in separate sections of a single chapter (VIII) . This differmlce in the treatment of dramatic styles is pronpted by a practical consideration. The critical cementary on the three latter styles is not sufficient to allow a complete description in tern: of the method outlined earlier in this chapter. However, they are discussed in as complete aimmner as sources permit. Since the criteria for stylistic identification in this study are based on a survey of critical opinions, they can only reflect the state and «- tent of couentary on individual styles. In view of the fact that the cementary on Formalism, Futurism, and Surrealism appears to be limited, their discussion in this study is also limited. However, they ‘1" Presented in a manner which allows than to be recognised should cliffQt‘uices betweml the two styles are in their principles and gmeral qualities, while their similarities, or near similarities, are in their fem elasents. Hefi‘ner, for moample, claims that Naturalism can be duforentiated from Realism "not by a method, but as a ph11050p1'w of 1 0 and literature" (Hubert c. Heffner, Samuel Seldom, and Hunton D. S Modern Theatre Practice [5th ed.; New York: Appleton-Century- cmfts, Inc. , 1959 , p. 73 . In practice it "«tends and intensifies “1° methods of realism," but in idea it follows Zola (Ibid., p. 71.). hckett advances an almost identical view when he writes, "Naturalism, ho"'Ver, went much further than realism, for it insisted that art mist b"mule scientific in its methods, and it placed greater aphasia on the 1d“ that all behavior is determined by the forces of heredity and en- mmnmt (p. 275). It is the thought of these writers that Zola's con- "Pt of scientific determinism with its resultant heavy emphasis on l""‘tlity and environment as the sole determinants of behavior is signi- m4‘Q-n‘t enough to warrant Naturalism's place as a separate style. In this study Naturalism is considered to be a separate and dis- tinKnishable dramatic style non Realism for the reasons «pressed by “it-ere adhering to the second view of Naturalism in the discussion 1“lediataly above. This position is also taken in view of the fact *km. the theory which treats Naturalism as a part of Realism admits to 4““ extremes and specialty of Naturalism. If Naturalism is indeed an rune and strict mode of Realism, then these very «trues not be “Fable of idmtification. They become the distinguishing features of ‘ naturalistic style. :3 uiiticn to U fizzle style in IE 1.3m my {or the the his theatre 33:32:, am the "livi 35:1?an in bat Milly recognized as has nittm in ‘ ’4! 321's. This oh: 13'1th that" In this Styli did 3;; 55-! hlcuse" ”Vlmt it first unplug“, 22 they appear in the plays selected from the drama of the 1920's. In addition to the eight dramatic styles listed above, a number of other styles are mentioned by critics. These styles are «eluded from this stub for the reasons given in the discussions which follow. The Epic theatre style associated with Bertolt Brecht, Erwin Piscator, and the "living newspaper" plays of the American Federal Theatre Project is not included in this study. While Epic theatre is guermlly recognised as a dramatic style, it is quite unlikely that any dramas written in this style would appear in the American drama of the l9m's. This observation is based on the chronological developsmt 0f the Epic theatre movumlt. Techniques now associated with Epic theatre style did appemr in the "living newspapers" of the Russian "blue blouse" movnmit in the early 1920's.23 However, this movuent had flmet completely disappeared by 1927.21‘ Its influence on the “MOquait development of the Epic theatre style is questionable.” Act‘ully, Epic theatre as it is known today was shaped in practice by mater and in theory by Brecht.26 Yet the first major works of these In in Epic theatre style appeared in 1928,27 the year of the M "1"trical season considered in this study. The possibility of the Productions of Piscator and Brecht having any significant effect on “when drama in the space of less than one year is remote. The p088ftbility of a native Epic theatre movuent in America in the 1920's \ 23Nikolai A. Gorchakov, The Thgtre in 501;ng Russ?” trans. Rig“. Lehrman (New York: Columbia University Press, 1957 , pp. 1454.6. 25cor-elm, pp. Aka-1.5. 26Ib1de, ppe 22-23e 27638811”, EOE 2d 192 e 3 e, pe 251s will: ”'5‘“ p" gull-decanted in 55:5 for Epic that: Aria ”abet“ the-at: 32's dish {crud t; r. the actual up; can see for the l9}: 's 11-;er fruitless 1 3‘34 bad no bearing ‘41! Mon, there i: 11;: study. Rntricilia i 5‘?! beg 35300th 3.1?me l that: in. Y ‘tn ‘ " hp ‘r: “‘7' tiCh are cttejl 1C “’1'. The 1‘s: 23 is equally ruote. Mordecai Goxelik's New Theatres for Old, which is well-documented in matters concerning Epic theatre, makes no claim for Epic theatre in America until the 1930's. True, some America "labor" theatres and playwrights' groups existed in the 1920's which formed the basis for the development of Epic theatre, but the actual appearance of Epic theatre plays in America was re- served for the 1930's.28 In view of this chronology of Epic theatre, it appears fruitless to include a discussion of a style which evi- dent]: had no bearing on Broadway productions of the 1920's. For this reason, there is no further consideration of Epic theatre style in this study. Theatricalism is also «eluded from this study. Some plays have hem associated with this style. But, as its name implies, it 1‘ Primarily a theatrical style. Theatricalism as a "pure" style is nuts It usually appears in the fom of theatricalist devices in 91478 which are otherwise recognizable as belonging to a particular dramatic style. The few plays associated with Theatricalism as a “auntie style .- for couple, Thornton Wilder's w and 313 \Skill 0; Our Tmh -- already have beml identified by new critics.29 Th. actual number of plays written in what might be termed a dramatic “310 of Theatricalism is rather insignificant. Since Theatricalism 1‘ Primarily a W style, there is little value in discussing it further in this study of dramatic styles. 0 Also, so-called "basic" or "generic" styles are not discussed in this study. ‘ 28eon-elm, pp. ADO-ml. 29038811023, :01“ am. Idea e e e e , pe 110-30 .‘c 3351:" cr "generic ’tgmetaticnal“ styl mm of actual life Wit» m other =5?- is to pmjoct m imam Since it 3735 13% tic stylist “Wit. The was $5? in subsmmt F‘- tisrhtiu :m m £13.: u Snip play: £15013}; Critics 5-; : ~ . {2" 1“” “Ila: 21+ Two "basic" or "generic" styles are recognized in drama. One is the "representational" style in which a play is presented "in manner and sequaace or actual life, as though people were being watched through a peephole. "30 The other is the "presentational" style in which "the object is to project the play's content frankly and directly to the Minceflal Since it is 39; the aim of this study merely to divide dramas into two stylistic groups, these "basic" styles are of little value to it. The words "represmtational" and "presmtational" may appear in subsequmt passages which discuss specific styles, but only as descriptive terms to indicate general tendencies. There is no att-pt to group plays under these "basic" style headings. Although critics have referred to the styles of Impressionism, SOlectiwe Realim, Cubism, Constructivism, Socialist Realism, and Wm, these styles are not considered in this study. "Impressionism 1‘ a ten: that applies to a mood, or to an aesthetic mdeavor merely: "1°“ is no particular dramatic form or technique (. . .) associated "ith its aims."32 Selective Realism, Cubism, and Constructivism belong t° the realm of thgtrical styles where they are useful in the dis- “”1011 or the scenic slants or production. Socialist Realism as a ”Wheat is too narrowly confined to modern Soviet drama. Although many plays have beam written in this style, they differ from Realism only in content, that of a socialist ph.i.l|.osophy.33 Dadaism in drama and \ . 30Gassner, Producgg' the Play, p. 51... 311E. ”Nisan. mama. p. 791.. 33See both Gassner, orm Id . . . . . p. 12, and Nicoll, 01' D p0 812s 2m iii not. Iain-e i'zazic at: in 3.1:: an? 1;; and 3s.- stat hex-icon p; "-r .- 4'6 o ~ meatsg.u.o L15 tr: ‘5 @3332: c: '25 chute ha 3597‘." ~ . a .‘n in an I" h. ""‘”l N listaj Q- fl. “is; v ‘p- . . t "PO-Q's . L t 3“".3 u , mung-13h: 01' 25 theatre did not endure long enough to provide a sufficient body of dramatic works in which a definite style might be discerned. e.e. cumings' fl and Gertrude Stein's flog; Saints in Three Acts are the best known American plays which have been termed Dadaist. Indeed, they alone constitute almost the entire canon of Dadaist drama. Any other Dadaiat dramatic achievements remain obscure since "Dadaist theatrical work was apparmtly confined mostly to private entertainmentsflph Smut This chapter has stated the definition of the word "style" °P°rative in this study, outlined a method for describing dramatic atvles, and listed the styles to which this method is to be applied in mbsequent chapters. The operative definition is: Style in drama is "a characteristic or distinctive way, manner, or mode of selecting, 8”ranging, and aphasizing the elements of dramatic construction which 13 POculiar to a play or group of plays and which at the same time dis- tinguishes it or than from other plays ." The method of describing dramatic styles is based on the general concepts of stylistic investiga- ti°n in all arts. It takes into consideration the principles which “7% the rise and developmt of a style, its gmeral characteristics (qualities, impressions, and form relationships), and its form eleaents (Plot, character, language and theme). The styles selected for dis- WeDion are Romanticism, Realism, Naturalism, Symbolism, Expressionism, “Min, Futurism and Surrealism. \_ 3‘601‘3111‘, p e 2h7e tare iii act aim i'dazic arts in Itizh zit g2 and 3a: a: has tried: in: mtit to Law M51 drastic iatie' tr: ‘5 @WEQ: cc 25 theatre did not endure long enough to provide a sufficient body of dramatic works in which a definite style might be discerned. e.e. cumings' L115 and Gertrude Stein's :03; Saints in Three Acts are the best known American plays which have been termed Dadaist. Indeed, they alone constitute almost the entire canon of Dadaist drama. Any other Dadaist dramatic achievements remain obscure since "Dadaist theatrical work was apparmtly confined mostly to private entertainments ."31‘ amen This chapter has stated the definition of the word "style" Opmtive in this study, outlined a method for describing dramatic styles, and listed the styles to which this method is to be applied in subsequent chapters. The operative definition is: Style in drama is "a characteristic or distinctive way, manner, or mode of selecting, ”'1‘ Eu131mg, and aphasising the slenents of dramatic construction which 1’ POculiar to a play or group of plays and which at the same time dis- tiJigtlishes it or then from other plays." The method of describing d‘rfifllfitic styles is based on the general concepts of stylistic investiga- ti‘m in all arts. It takes into consideration the principles which “v.11: the rise and developed of a style, its gmeral characteristics (qualities, impressions, and form relationships), and its form elements (Plot, character, language and these). The styles selected for dis- WeSion are Romanticism, Realism, Naturalism, Symbolism, Expressionism, l’"1‘llelism, Futurism and Surrealism. \_ Sawrglik, p e 2h7e weigh the ts :3: misty of peria 521nm and 81:55“ my bejan as a 54 he begi'mmg o: hitting-em, produm iii: hazy, Baum “mil: betas ax. ”~93: trld. is: p: CHAPTER III ROMANTIC ISM Historical Background Although the term "romantic" had been applied to the literature of a variety of periods and individual writers, including William Shakespeare and subsequent Jacobean dramatists, Romanticism in drama actually began as a solid movement in the late eightemth century. The beginning of the movenent is marked by Goethe's m W, produced in Germany in 1773.1 In general, after develop- 1118 in W, Romanticism next appeared in England, then in Frames, and finally became an influence on all the major national dramas of the "Stern world. For purposes of clarity, the following outline of the dwfilopent of romantic style in drama is reported in terms of national no“Clients. Gummy Goethe's W belonged to m. W Phase of Games Romanticism, a phase which ended by 1781..2 A second Phase of German Romanticism (contemporaneous with Sturm and Dr , but m“lusting that phase) was marked by the drama of Goethe, Schiller and \ @8311”, 0 e e e , p. 2280 21mph Tim. WW (London: hotness and 00" lame, 1955), Do 10. 26 Dist. Schiller cent: 21%, Gcethc dd a E fcllcm by Schfile (lit). the m c Cr". r: [213: (1m-;3;1) ‘ 1m and Schiller, ’3 iii?- dre Patti: 9‘. He first pug c 1'33. In this size i-T'ri by gum. can“ ”P‘s” °f Zachcia; ‘re-QJ The P451“ mm o! the last :- tznimu , .33; 'h. $32550“ th. '5. "93 N inwtfi to .3213: 27 Heist. Schiller contributed The gathers (177s) and Don Carlos (1783). In 1788, Goethe added another major work to the movement, M. This was followed by Schiller's Wallenstein trilogy (1798-99), Maria StM (lsoo), zhe gin o; Orlggs (1801), and W (1801.). Heinrich von noist (1777-1811), while usually not ranked in importance with Goethe and Schiller, wrote some notable romantic dramas, the best known of which are W (1808) and The Prince 0; Hamburg (1809). The first part of Goethe's most significant drama, M, appeared in 1&8. In this same general period, the romantic style was also a- ployed by other German literary figures. Romanticism was apparent in the plus of Zacharias Werner and the "book-dramas of Tieck, Armin, and Bl”Ethane."3 The publication of Goethe's second part or Eggs} in 1832 '38 one or the last significant works in the German romantic movuent. Mticism as a major movuent declined but did not completely die out. England Throughout the first halt or the nineteenth century English “'1th attupted to establish a vigorous romantic drama, but "failed to Muse greatness in the romantic dramatic forum" Some of England's ”’t rmowned poets -- Byron, Shelley, and Browning -- directed their hints to writing romantic drama. Byron's Manfred (1817) was one of th. first notewortlv English romantic plays. Three years later, Shelley's W and eus 0 were completed but were dmied stage Motion. i lesser literary figure, James Sheridan Knowles, did “hie" some success with the production or his W in 183). A \ 3M" P0 298° ‘Iicoll, Wogld m, p. “2. ye his, Byron again 3:2}: {to nest vital kin-Lmtn‘l The In: the ridge sentiment]; izifft‘mi'q received 11‘} me let. com-i i‘da. 28 year later, Byron again failed at romantic drama with W. Perhaps the most vital of the English romantic dramas were Edward George Miter-Lytton's The E! o: Lygns (1838) and Richgigg (1839) which held the stage continuously into the twentieth century.5 Robert Browning's infliffermtly received Pippa Passes (1&3) and A Blot on the 'Scutcheon (181.6) were late contributions to the English romantic movmmt in drama. France The birth of Romanticism in French drama was most clearly indi- atod in Victor Hugo's preface to his pm gm; (1827), in which he x"e'loo‘ted Recs-classic principles and outlined a program for Romantic 4.12.3.6 Alexandre Dmas pig's Hgi III in 1829 was the first romantic Play to see production, but it was the success of Hugo 's Hernani in 1830 that. established Romanticism as a major movenent in French drama.7 During the 1830's, Hugo, Dumas 2‘53, and other French playwrights DI‘<><:uced romantic drama of note. W by Dumas ple_r_e appeared in 1832. In 1831., Alfred de Hussett added W and 39 W to the movmmt. The following year, Alfred de v1Gray's best known play, Qhattertgn, was produced in France. For all its vigor, the Frmch romantic movuent was doomed to be “Orb-lived. The complete failure of Hugo's Les Burmves in 181.3 B:Lgl'ialled the end of Romnticism as a major movement in France. is a Minor part of French drama, Romanticism appeared be. time to time in “Na: plays as New: Wm (ms) and \ ‘ sfiockflt, pe 226e 6&881101', 0 d. e e 0 g P0 229' 7.130 Emi's madly p01 7* wag-bout east c dare were higbiy in. Elf-:1: than was act mastic mum, 231i?! Mitten plug 37%“: _ a his tam“ tstabli 5h t .. 7:1? h‘ h - ‘Sec‘u e‘rlCres I t ha“ " lit. 29 Roetand's extralely popular time do Buggy (1897). America Throughout most of the nineteenth century, American drama and theatre were highly imitative of English and European models. While American drama was not wholly romantic, it was strongly influmced by the romantic movanent from abroad. Twp of the most highly regarded native American plays written up to 1870, Robert M. Bird's The W (1831) and George Henry Baker's Mcesca da Rimini (1855), We romantic tragedies.8 Romnticism as a dramatic style continued in America well into the t""GIu‘tieth cultury in the form of historical drama. Notable examples of this were Madmen. Anderson's Elizabeth thg Queen, Anne 0‘ 8 Thoust 134%.MW- Romanticism and Melodrama A part of the overall history of Romanticism in the drama, but ‘%QMt mough in this study to warrant a separate discussion, is the b‘J—ationship of Romanticism to melodrama. In 1919, Irving Babbitt Qt‘ted in his famous book, Roussgu gag thigig, "Nothing is easier than to establish the connection between notional romanticism and the bunidigious efflorescmce of melodrama, the irresponsible quest for thins, that has marked the past half century."9 This connection meted almost from the beginning of Romanticism in drama. The generally \ ‘ .Richard Moody, eri '1' es s Sta e (Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1955 9 Po 200. 9Irving Babbitt, Roussgau and thigism (New York: Houghton “itrlin so., 1919), p. 189. :1:an {carriers . , I human, Puereccur‘. imzi: mvmmts in . 10 2!. M" yce Nicol] mm: Changed its '34. to the urban. M Mamie m 1 m mid of the past, it Seems laterals “‘ m ‘150 both I he . . 95 km obseh't JLE 30 acknowledged founders or melodrama (the German, Kotzebue, and the Frenchman, Pixere’court) were contanporary to the initial romantic dramatic wants in their respective countries, and often imitated 10 thm. Allardyce Nicoll notes that in the years between 1830 and 1850 melodrama changed its settings and characters from the feudal to the rural, to the urban. In other words, melodrama became more closely connected with its contmnporary environment. However, melodrama "ruins romantic in the basic sense of the term, only it passes from “10 world of the past to the world of the present; it sheds medievalism “1‘1 becomes material."u Melodrama and Romanticism are not only closely linked in modern drain, but also both have been highly influenced by Realism. As Ja‘xlues Bax-sun observes, "Realism oftm appears side by side with an atgm‘Qeable make-believe which I have teamed 'secondhand romanti- 913‘, . . . ."12 John Gassner makes a similar observation when he gut» : . . . A meretricious, vulgar romanticism has, besides, been present everyumre in our cmtury, as in other times. It masqueraggs as prose realism and tries to cheat with false nationae For purposes of this study, Romanticism is considered to be a 101mm“ Willson Disher, "Melodrama," o n the w ed. Phyllis Hartnoll (2d ed. 3 London: Oxford University Press, 957 , pp. 525-523. nNicoll, Hog; Drfl, p. 1.85- I) 12Jacques Barsun, ssi Ro Modern (New York: Q“illzileclay and Co., 1961), p. 10 . 13John Gassner, A Trees 0 the h tre: H Ibsen to W (revised ed.; New York: Simon and Schuster, 1950), p. 259. sigleiramti style e 31mins do act deg; aim claims or 3.; 1E: mints in subse imitation of the p 59. the variants vi; [1531-16 in Nation in}, 0! thh) Kid 3333;... 1".“ tticl M). 31 single dramatic style encompassing two variant forms of a basic style. The variants do not depart radically from the general characteristics and form alumts of Romanticism. In order to facilitate discussion of these variants in subsequent sections of this chapter and in the actual idmtification of the plays which constitute the second part of this study, the variants will be referred to as "historical" Romanticism (denoting an imitation of historic Romantic styles such as Elizabethan, German, or French) and "secondhand" Romanticism (denoting plays that are basically Romantic, but which, in some respects, resemble prose Realism). fiingiples of Romanticism The principles or basic ideas which underlie the dramatic style or Romanticism can be traced back to the developnent of romantic philo- IOphical theories in the eighteenth and early ninet emth centuries . Though several theories were formulated, all had in comon a search "for a new systu of explaining the nature of reality and the duties of man."'“' These theories also shared an Opposition to a concept of God and the universe which was implicit in the Hebraic thought of the Old Testament and which had governed the thoughts of Western man since the days of Plato: a concept of the universe as a perfectly functioning mechanism created by a suprmne being and Operating according to i-ltable laws.” In the general concepts of romantic theory, God is not perfect “horse Peckhan, "Toward a New Theory of Romanticism,” M- : Points 0 V ed. Robert P. Gleckner and Gerald E. Enscoe (Enslavood'”c'11::a,d New Jersey: Prentice—Hall, Inc., 1962), p. 216. 15Me , we 215-16e .___ his Iii: universe I his bowling pnfc 16 mes. 511.1th an ac that ha ll 53-! 11:! sale «31:: mm is conceived Mal, Static, a 139ch print: "TL! in exists .4 in 9.0 universe ha. I 1 ~01 hind, 1 than. 32 nor is His universe a perfect mechanism. Rather God is imperfect, but is becoming perfect through a constantly creative evolutionary process.16 Similarly, the universe, because God created it "out of himself so that he night more easily contemplate himself, "17 is under- going the same evolutionary process. Thus in romantic theory the universe is conceived of as organic, growing, and changing rather than mechanical, static, and fixed. A second principle of romantic theory is the assumption that 18 everything in existence is a part of everything else. Since every- thing in the universe has a cannon origin in that it was created by God out of himself, it follows that God, nature, and man are all in- ten-elated. The world of'nature is ‘one manifestation of Spirit: man is another and a higher such manifestation, for in man Spirit seeks to become conscious of its own work. The metaphysical process is the process by which the Absolute seeks to realifg itself, and all particular things are but phases within 1 . A third principle of romntic theory is that truth is appre- hnded through intuition. "Reason, being artificial and analytical, is inadequate to the task of comprehending the Absolute: knowing is living," and nature must be approached "through inspiration, longing, and sympathy."20 The artistic or poetic experience is seen as a form of knowledge. "It is fundammtally the intuition of a cosmic unity: the intuition that the universe is not an unintelligible chaos, nor a well-regulated mechanism, but a living organism, imbued throughout 1611213., p. 217. l7Brockett, p. 221.. Egg. 19Iredell Jenkins, "Romanticism," Th3 Dictiogg-z o; Phgosowy, Gd. Dagobert D. Runes (New York: Philosophical Library, Inc. , 191.2 , P0 272. ”mg. '1: a: idea with en“. sewn The ccncepts gtv :1: in the mastic nets include crig“ ti: IS the prim hear. tints: and priniti—v 5" ”35113111 rules 1 Mia: and the st: '30 concoction c: 31213133.” n; :2 2* unite-3,11,»:3 fitness of the uni.- .i. ._W ' .. 53...“: am his CI"- 33 with an idea which endows it with its unity, its life, and its harmony."21 The concepts governing Romanticism in drama and the other arts at. from the romantic philosophical theories discussed above. These concepts include original gains, the reliance on «notion and intui- tion as the prime means of apprehending reality, the inherent goodness of nature and primitive man, freedom of the individual, the rejection of established rules for creating art, and the depiction of the particular and the strange. "The conception of original genius" underlies the whole movement or Romanticz‘Lsm.22 "Genius may be defined as imaginative perception 0f the universal,"23 or as "an innate ability to gasp intuitively the greatness of the universe."2h The artist is most often the possessor 0f gains and his creativity springs "spontaneously from the depths of the unconscious."25 Thus romantic art is based on intuition rather than reason. Romanticism in art stresses the values of sincerity, spontaneity, and passion, . . . . It reasserts the primacy of feeling, imagination, and sentiment, . . . . It commands the artist to feel freely and deeply and to express what 58 has felt with no restraints, either artistic or social. Since romanticists stress the intuitions of genius as the true bases for knowledge, they regard rational thought and all that is 21mm. Gerard, "0n the Logic of Romanticism," Romantici Poms oz View, ed. Robert F. Gleckner and Gerald E. Enscoe Ehglewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1962), p. 230. ”Babbitt, p. so. 231nm, p. 1.1. ZbBrockett, p. 221.. ”Babbitt, p. 51. 26Jenkins, p. 273. assisted with it as - 211* needed if cne ' umwmdwt bassist mutic referee with the cr' it aims sexism. “$337531 control 1 “3‘45 that Ian ca: “$355111 of his on M Eu‘ml‘esstoc. "‘- Tn. distrust of A". 'II \ no. 50* meus or t 34 associated with it as artificial and false. "The conscious analysis that is. needed if one is to establish orderly sequences and relation- ships and so work out a kingdom of ads is repudiated by the Rousseauist [romanticist] because it diminishes wonder, because it interferes with the creative impulse of genius."27 The romanticist also reflects Christian and classical disciplines because they, too, artificially control the expression of genius.28 The romanticist maintains that man can only Imow the truth of his nature by the "free expression of his ordinary self."29 The romanticist seeks "to shake Off the tramels of tradition and reason in favor of free and passion- ate self-expression."30 The distrust of rational thought and its consequences led to another principle of Romanticism in art, the turning to nature for the discovery and expression of truth. The romantic "return to nature" is based on Rousseau's idea of spontaneity - that is, "genius resides in the region of the primitive and unconscious and is hindered rather than helped by culture."31 This principle can also be traced to the fundamental idea of romantic theory, according to which everything in the universe shares a common origin. Thus, a "study of any part may lead to a glimpse of the whole."32 But, since nature as a part of the universe is not subjected to the artificialities of civilization, and is therefore, closer to the original creations of God, "the more suit- able it is in the search for truth."33 For these reasons, Romanticism ”Babbitt, p. 51. 23mm, p. 1.6. 291bide, pe 1.28s BORE" pe me alibide, pe 65o BZE‘OCkG‘bt, pe me 33mm. unit: “an intense 11 1:31 satural phenszem Related to the r. fitment gcodness 1 21253;”? pcst'ilates ' 13:11": by an artiri 4-35 5-11 rigidities, 1:21;: fish lea-is to 3:92:51 ka to r: ’0. I k. ;. Lfib‘uh‘lm ““‘dit’ ""3 13 «1211 m ['33: eccacfic er 1d 35 exhibits "an intense interest in nature, and . . . attanpt[s] to seize natural phenomena in a direct, immediate, and naive manner."3h Related to the romantic "return to nature" is the principle of the inherent goodness of man. This fundamental assertion of Rousseau's philosOpl'y postulates that man is naturally good, but that he is led into evil by an artificial and corrupt society. Society, with its limits and rigidities, conflicts with man's desire for freedom of action which leads to unhappiness. "Only get away from an artificial society ani back to nature and the inner conflict which is but a part Of the artificiality will give way to beauty and harmorv."35 In the principles of romantic art, primitive society is "idealized as a con- dition in which man was free to follow the dictates of his conscience without economic and political strictures . "36 A final principle of Romanticism, that of revolt against estab- lished political, social, and aesthetic orders or traditions, is linked to the concepts of original genius and primitivism. The possessors of "genius", according to romantic theory, must be free to follow their intuitions of truth. The. “freedom to do so is hampered or denied by established laws. Similarly, "artificial" society interfered with or corrupted the supposed "goodness" of the primitive way of life. The re- sult was a revolt against existing social and political structures. Romanticists protested against "inherited laws and customs, rules of conduct for life and art, and the barriers which would bind.';7 "The equality of man and the freedom of action became battle cries of the w - “Jenkins, p. 273. ”Babbitt, p. 130. 36h°k0tt, pe 22‘.» 37M“, pe 2e amvcmtoga Th; interim and PM! In the arts tin: 3:12: in the reject: fined to be in cc: mini: . Pmmanti tzse finalities it t 5‘95! to diSCCW 36 new movcnmt."38 This principle of revolt was clearly manifested in the American and French revolutions of the late eighteenth century.39 In the arts the romantic search for needom in expression re- sulted in the rejection of the traditional Neo-classic rules. Genius was believed to be in conflict with these rules which were regarded as too confiningf"o Romanticism was in continual Opposition to classicism, whose formalities it treated as fetters.“ Genius was able to make its own rules, to discover new fonns which "would allow the maximum freedom in expressing the infinity of creation."k2 As part of the search for new forms, romntic artists began the practice of depicting the particular, the strange, and even the grotesque. Since truth cannot he arrived at by rational standards or "nouns" but can be seen in the infinite variety of creation, romantic artists sought to "encompass the infinite variety of thingsflfi3 They maintained that "art Should concern itself with the particular and concrete, observing and reporting accurately the feelings aroused by nature."M In addition to depicting the particular and concrete. Victor Hugo, in particular, ad- vocated a union between the grotesque and the sublime, "the body and the soul, the beast and the inte.‘l_lect."l'5 According to Hugo, the 38m0c1tdt , p e 2210» 39mg e wage qukins, pe 273e uBrockett, pp. 224-25. “Bug" 1). 224. “Jenkins, p. 273- ASVictor Hugo, "Preface to Cromwell," trans. George Burnham Ives, Mean Theories of the Drg, ed. Barrett H. Clark (revised ed.; New York: Crom Publishers, Inc., 19”), P- 369- mm or oppcsites . he an: experience. w; in 51cm and ti: Although Beam: 3'- hzs therefore uni balm“: plays C rm or five genera “Misfits are: Rites of Fasten. flimi'itn (3) an «as stri tum if itsL‘es; (a) a pref“ Ed the mtuque; 3.‘ First of all, Ms 0: ' We ”330m ha; 37 contrast of opposites would enhance beauty and make art truer to 136 comon experience. The pursuit of strangeness also served to "break up the smooth and tiresome surface of artificial decorumufi'? Characteristics of Romanticism General Characteristics Although Romanticism is the oldest of the modern dramatic styles and has therefore undergone a number of changes in some of its particu— lar slants, plays can be idmtified as belonging to this style by virtue of five general characteristics cannon to romantic drama. These characteristics are: (1) a tendency away from actuality which includes qualities of ructeness and escape 3 (2) an aphasia on notionality and subjectivity; (3) an insistence on needom and a corresponding rebellion against strictures which limit the individual's acting according to his desires; (h) a predilection for depicting the particular, the strange, and the grotesque; and. (5) a concern for nature and uncivilised man. First of all, remoteness and escape are grouped together as as- pects of a general tmdency away from actuality in Romanticism. Both of these aspects have in con-ton a rmval of dramatic action from every- day reality as most hman beings experience it. Undoubtedly, this characteristic can be traced to the romantic principle of freedom in artistic creation. It is more accurate to say that it is a result of the practices of romantic playwrights. Relotmess as a characteristic of Romanticism in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries was largely confined to "a return to the medieval and rmaissance worlds for subjects and settings “613g. ”Babbitt, p. 55. titre of W m 2'.ch the w" c is sent man-0 i 52‘ a my, in Ire-:5 and 5‘1“" n a nits: a! "3 flatness with: m" Mticim 1‘ {lies of ICU-"43°: fizz-fie merm” imticia 1:. ne‘- u pm. of its #5521311 observe In , a nave-never 1‘4: rcrld are equal h‘tt’: ”antic dram 38 1.8 ' and in spirit." For example, one of the "most characteristic feattn'es of the French romantic drama" was an "historical reconstruc- tion of the life, customs, and institutions of the Middle .‘utgesd'l‘9 This same feature is noted in German romantic dra.ma.5o Renoteness re- mained an almost indispensable quality in Romanticism evm after the French and German movaumts, but it was expanded to renoteness in place and culture as well as in time.51 Today remotaless may also be seen as ruotmess within a culture in view of a tendency in modern "second- hand" Romanticism in which the adventures of secret agmts, detectives, soldiers of fortune, and others whose lives and experiences are ranoved mm the experience of ordinary human beings are portrayed. Romanticism in practice exhibits the qualities of "escape litera- ture" as part of its tendmcy away from actuality. Heffner, Selden, and Seliman observe that "Romanticism tends to create an ideal dream world, a never-never land of the imagination. The persons who inhabit this world are equally idealised and colored by imagination."52 The bench romantic drama of the early nineteenth century "proved to be a complicated pattern of passionate characters, extravagant contradictions , ABEenneth Thorp Rowe, A Theatre in log; Head (New York: Funk and Hagnalls Co., 1960), p. 178. ”FJJJ. Draper, The Rise 39g F; of the flash Rmtic Drama ("a Iork: EePe Button and 00e, node , Fe 1310 mm, p. 6. SJ‘Hillett and Bentley, pp. 139-40. ”Hubert c. Heffner, Samuel Selden, and Hunton D. Sellman, Mod Theatre gectige (hth ed.; New York: Appleton-Century—Crofts, 1959 , p. 760 1:.» inlanations, 1 5’4?“ filled witJ 3:51:17 seems” "I I! ‘15: 301d I: a ‘ mm to the Middle 32$: Present, a ‘ SW of as 1563.11: imibe plays that 1 3‘2 Rah-1y into a l 51:17»;in the fine: antic ’mirgs" L3; 9:...e ‘ I M“ ‘1‘ 8lizards. . n “3713513 0:: 39 lofty declamations, and unbelievable intrigues."53 The romantic French stage was filled with such imaginative and escapist fare as "moonlighted or stem scales," "galloping horses," and "clashing swords."51‘ Escape was also noted as a feature of the German romantic drama in which the return to the Middle Ages in content and spirit "expressed a retreat from the present, a deliberate turning away from everyday reality in favour of an idyllic dream. "5 5 In modern usage Romanticism is used to describe plays that provide "the audience an agreeable period of escape from reality into a world more cocciting or pleasantly ordered."56 In such plays the element of escape is heightened through the use of "emetic settings" and "the pursuit of the spectacular and the sensa- tional in situation, characterization, and emotion."57 An «aphasia on the notional and subjective aspects of human be- havior is a second general characteristic of Romanticism. From the dis- cussion of the principles of Romanticism it can be seen that the reac- tion of the German and French romantic playwrights against the "notional restraint and formal rigidity of the preceding neo «classicism" caused a "turning inward on individual personal consciousness and ex- perience as the knowable reality and a mirror of the universal."58 This resulted in a condition in romantic drama where the element of action takes precedence over the elmmt of reason and the passion for 53s. A. Rhodes, "France and Belgium," A Histeg of Modern Drama, ed. Barrett H. Clark and George Freedley (New York: D. Appleton- Century 00., 191.7). pp. 235-236. 5"Ibid. 55m, p. l. 56RO'0, pe 179e 57Ibide, pe 180. 58Ride , pe l78e 59 3111:] for feet." tithe instinctive and crisis as lattien a: ELL-anal Bmce Car; 2.: “the ccld‘q 1.23:: ‘ie 112m or spirj he Guiana] 5; 335.21: 35-7-3- It w- .“ ‘5 their pastas 351121;“ ‘ . vae *eain ,. ~ “.5 “km 1:335" was t [+0 "59 fidelity for fact. Indeed, there appears to be "an idealization of the instinctive and non-rational powers" of the human mindf”0 This «aphasia on «notion and feeling is also noted by Heffner, Selden, and Sellman.61 Bruce Carpenter, in his book The Way of the Drama, states that "the coldly logical or matter-of-fact has no part in romanceg"62 "the emotional or spiritual element in romance should exceed the in- tellectual."63 The notional side of human behavior was anphasized in French romantic drama. It was the practice of the romantic playwrights to "show us their protagonists at the zenith or nadir of their lives" where "these leading figures are seen at the last actranity of an emo- tion or passion."6h One of the "most characteristic features of the Romantic drama" was the treatment of love as "an overmastering passion, upon which, and upon which only, the action of the drama must be malty“ 66 A similar enotionality is characteristic of German Romanti- cisn. Thirdly, Romanticism is involved with the idea of freedom and a corresponding opposition to any limitation of the freedom of the indi- vidual. The romantics' revolt against classicism resulted in an 59Millett and Bentley, p. 139. 609g. 6ll'leffner, Seldm, and Bellman, p. 77. 62Bruce Carpenter, The W o t e Dr (New York: Prentice-Hall, 11160, 1929), De 13km 63nge “Wrap”, pe 118. 65mm, p. 131. “Tyne, p. 18. “mzeent of the {I in and uprossion h antic molt invcl' raisin against tr. esteem, it repress rarity." The characteris m Frnch resent: M ' The sue n.“ f” mimtion. e" imiom ‘0 has; “""55 111 Mm; 5:521; of Pclitical Pitt-:3: 3; ° Were:- Al "mhancanent of the freedom of the individual"67 and a "freedom of form and expression in variety and content"68 For the most part, the romantic revolt involves "assertion of [the] individual in thought and expression against the reduction of rule and order,"69 but, in some instances, it represmts "a defiance of aesthetic and sometimes moral authority. "70 The characteristic danand for freedom in Romanticism was apparent in the French romantic drama. As F.H.H. Draper says in his book, Th3 Rise and Fall of the [ranch Romantic Drag, The same freedom which the Romantic writers demanded for thuselves they allowed to the creatures fathered by their own imagination. No conventions, no moral laws which have been found to make for human happiness did they abstain from flouting in novel, poem, or play.7 Aspects of political rebellion were also seen in Romantic plays that presented the poorer classes demanding equality with the higrer classes, disparagemmt of the nobility, and even deliberate attacks against the monarch.72 German romantic drama shared the passion for freedom and rebellion. The Sturm und Bragg phase of Romanticism was an expression of exagger- ated individualism.73 Later, German Romanticism continued to insist on "unrestricted individualism and subjectivism in art'm" This freedom of the individual implied "the refusal to seek formal regularity, and to 67Hillett and Bentley, p. 139. 68Rowe, p. 179 6911539,. whiuett and Bentley, p. 139. nDrap”, ppe w-hle 721bide, pe 286e ”Tums, p. 13. 7m- arm. artist Emticim h 3:311:13 with the Euler mastic au risque detail and 3'11: 0! detail is iisicse the reader Wife, the U516? Maser H511 us: far the striki 1+2 subordinate motion to intellect."75 Romanticism has as its fourth general characteristic a pre- occupation with the portrayal of the picturesque and the strange. Earlier romantic authors took pride in their "faithfulness to pic- turesque detail and local color."76 This cultivation of the presen- tation of detail led ultimately to realistic drama.77 The desire to disclose the wonder and nwstery of life led to an interest in the strange, the msterious, even the bizarre and the grotesque. Presser Hall Frye prefers to call this characteristic "a fond- uses for the striking and unusual,"78 or a "a susceptibility to irregular beauty.”9 He explains the development of this character- istic by saying that . . . , the writer who looks upon literature as a function of life, . . . - such an author may succeed in producing the characteristic waywardness and "wonder" of nature. In this view the idiosyncratic as possessed of superior actu- ality, tends to become the exclusive subject of representa- tion. Individualisation, not typification is the desideratum. The strange, the irregular, the unusual engross a correspond- ingly larger share of attention. T38 exception rather than the principle comes to be the rule. The portrayal of the strange and unusual is inclusive enough to cover the strangaless associated with evil, whether plvsical or psychological. "The romanticist found it possible to invest with something of glamour — 751bid., p. 20. 76Rhodes, pp. 235-36. 77N1¢°119 We 13' 1509- 78Prosser Hall Frye, R ce Tra (Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press, 1961;, p. 35. ”mm. 8°Ibig., p. 3A5. as: the physio. gizticn CI 2.1: . the irrational 1 :33, am g..cs1 is has ah . rem-a ~' “eatia' Eu; 5“ —‘ v .‘ ""1 L30 CF- .1115 nah rap: 3 ‘13.: 1.3: & “33511.1; . nu #3 even the Weically and morally deformed."81 Associated with the de- piction of the strange and msterious in Romanticism is an "appeal to the irrational or superrational; madness, hallucination, magic, witch- craft, an! ghosts."82 ‘ As has already been noted in the discussion of the principles of Romanticism, Hugo, in his "Preface to Cromwell," advocated the inclu- sion of the grotesque as a part of the subject matter of drama. His suggestion was followed in many French romantic plays, but the por- trayal of the strange and unusual was not limited to the grotesque. The French dramatists, under the influence of the novels of Sir Walter Scott, also uployed such unusual or strange content as "disguis es," "duels with rapier, poniard and cloak," "superstition and the super- natural," "mrders," "concealed trapdoors, secret rooms and passages," "dungeons," "alchm, sylphs, gnomes, salamanders, naiads, [any unclines."83 German romntic drama, too, displayed a concern for the strange and unusual. Authors devised bizarre situations because strangeness was not only attractive in itself but denonstrated "detachmmt from the inherited classicist rules of congruity and mums“ They showed "an inconsistent sense of realistic observation in recording bizarre -- . . . - details from life and behavior."85 The fifth and last general characteristic of Romanticism as a dramatic style is the treatment of nature and man living close to mfiillett and Bentley, p. 11.0. 82lbid. 83Draper, p. 52. Bl‘Tyms, p. 19. 85%., p. 7. m. 'hia clam: :! 521‘: in the prir. in 1:5;ch by civi .izn nth original c t: 33:13 ”abcut uns; '3‘ m in rebellic: In inatticiszi #33111: I lean: 5"“ “5 Ck'acters. 3“” 3 3m in tn ’3". Ms. ‘6“ 33' 35:31 by the ”5553 it been 3981. On 37 In these 1; RI!- "Qecfin, amt} Mt nature. This characteristic is a logical extension of the importance of nature in the principles of Romanticism. Nature and primitive man are unspoiled by civilization and therefore supposedly are the best links with original creation and universal truth. This concept leads to dramas "about unspoiled men living in primitive times or for those who were in rebellion against the false restraints of society."86 In Romanticism, nature is often more than a mere background for a play; it is a means of projecting the thoughts and moods of the author and his characters. In the bench romantic drama, the inspiration of nature is seen in the use of the detail of rural scenes, parks, and river banks. But nature is more than a background when a murder is framed by the rugged shoreline and lightning furrows the heavens or when lovers meet on a serene summer night lighted by the moon's first rays.87 In these instances nature is conveniently reflective of man's actions. In German Romanticism the attitude toward nature is markedly subjective. Romantic authors "saw very much what they wished to see, and distorted, blurred - in short 'romanticized' - the world of physical appearances so as to obtain a projection of their om inner world of fantasy and dreams."88 36Brockett, p. 221.. 87Georges Pellissier, The Literary Movement in Eggnog 29;;ng the Nineteenth Cent_u;_-y, trans. Anne G. Brinton New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1897 , pe 110. 88Tyulns, p. 26. This subjectivity in German Romanticism is apparently connected with later German experimnts in Expressionism. It differs in that it does not distort surface reality nor follow the supposed psychological reality of Expressionism. The fantasy and dreams of the German romanticists were usually possible but improbable rearrangemmts of everyday reality. Since, {or put: human, scat cczr.r tc‘stizs as they 3;; me fanaticism ' tithe mastic Sty;- I3365i: on action. imam fer natu- mac. #5 Since, for purposes of this study, two types of Romanticism have been noted, some coments on the identification of the general charac- teristics as they apply to each type are in order. Regardless of whether Romanticism in drama is "historical" or "secondhand," a play in the romantic style has a tendency away from actuality and an aphasis on «notion. "Historical" Romanticism is morelikely to show a concern for nature and be involved in the ideas of freedom and re- bellion. Opposition to social and moral codes is more common in "secondhand" Romanticism than opposition to political and economic restrictions. Depiction of picturesque detail appears in both types of Romanticism, although it may not be obvious in "secondhand" Romanticism, since plays of this type are at least superficially realistic. The depiction of the strange and mysterious does not abso- lutely need to be present in either type, but this characteristic comonly exists. Strange and awsterious events in "secondhand" Romanticism often have "rational" explanations, while in "historical" Romanticism the appearance of the supernatural or waterious may be accepted as a convention. The concern for nature and/or uncivilised man is more comon in "historical" Romanticism. Form Elments Plot Plots in Romanticism are "characteristically loose in their con- struction" and are "free in their use of elapsed timfang shifts in place, . . . ."89 "The essential characteristic of the structure of 89Charles Cooper, Prefacg _t_9 the Dry (New York: The Ronald has COe, 1955), pe 139e maczien . . ' for 111.1: the manic I 26th of his uteri. tn: eagles" o! r 2:; are not "ccnstr that is used he; mzic dram, pin: '11: in practice the}; It chm: the uni‘ "i." e execs or that air" 6‘- i seconi [eat' 1.6 romantic drama is the substitution of the diversity of time, place, and action . . . for the unities of time, place, and action."90 This allows the romantic playwright a "froedom in the selection and presen- tation of his material that is denied the strict classicist."9l The "best examples" of romantic plays adhere to a unity of action,92 but they are not "constrained to follow a single plot, "93 that is, the subplot is used frequently. In early nineteenth century French romantic drama, playwrights claimed to be free from the "unities," but in practice they were not disregarded entirely. Playwrights did not observe the unity of place but were less free in violating the unities of time and actions?“ A second feature of the plot structure in Romanticism is the mingling of the serious and the comic. Gassner terms this practice as breaking a "unity of tone."95 Thismixture of the serious and the comic is also noted by Thomas Dickinson and Millett and Bentley.96 There are some secondary features of structure in romantic drama. Romantic plays may use a chronological structure often composed of many scenes.97 In keeping with a chronological structure, the point 9°Hillett and Bentley, p. 11.1. 91mg. 920arpenter, p. 131.. ”Gassner. W. p- 61- 9“Draper, p. 1.16. ”Gassner. W. p- 61~ 96 Thomas H. Dickinson, An Outline 0 Con Dr (Cambridge, Mass: The Riverside Press, 19275. p. s, and Hillett and Bentley, Do Me 97 Cooper, p- 139. manic inn is th- m’am- ~ ' for than or his later;- ’w. main" °‘ r 5;, are not "ccnstr @2115 mi {1’91 rustic dram. Phi t: in practice they r: :bmc the .i‘ tities a! time and esteem flat! Lang 0! the ser baking a ‘ty 0 “is also noted 46 romantic drama is the substitution of the diversity of time, place, and action . . . for the unities of time, place, and action."90 This allows the romantic playwright a "freedom in the selection and presen- tation of his material that is denied the strict eleeeieiet."9l The "best maples" of romantic plays adhere to a unity of action,92 but they are not "constrained to follow a single plot,"93 that is, the subplot is used frequently. In early nineteenth century French romantic drama, playwrights claimed to be free from the "unities," but in practice they were not disregarded entirely. Flu-nights did not observe the unity of place but were less free in violating the unities of time and action.9“ A second feature of the plot structure in Romanticism is the mingling of the serious and the comic. Gassner terms this practice as breaking a "unity of tone."95 This mixture of the serious and the comic is also noted by Thomas Dickinson and Hillett and Bentley.96 There are some secondary features of structure in romantic drama. Romantic plays may use a chronological structure often composed of many scenes.97 In keeping with a chronological structure, the point 9°xillett and Bentley, p. 11.1. 91%. 92Carpenter, p. 131.. ”Gassner, w, p. 61. 9“Draper, p. 116. ”Gassner. W. p- 61- 96Thomas H. Dickinson, An Outme of Contmm Drg (Cambridge, Mass: The Riverside Press, 1927 . p. 8, and Nillett and Bentlfiy, p. m. 97 Cooper, pe 139e mastic m. is tho inaction . . . forI '3 '4‘ Practice the: not theme the uni . 3212135 at time and main; of the 881“ e... A6 romantic drama is the substitution of the diversity of time, place, and action . . . for the unities of time, place, and action."90 This allows the romantic playwright a "fraedom in the selection and presen- tation of his material that is denied the strict classicist."9l The "best examples" of romantic plays adhere to a unity of action,92 but they are not "constrained to follow a single plot ,"93 that is, the subplot is used frequently. In early nineteenth century French romantic drama, playwrights claimed to be free from the "unities," but in practice they were not disregarded entirely. Playwrights did not observe the unity of place but were less free in violating the unities of time and action.9l‘ A second feature of the plot structure in Romanticism is the mingling of the serious and the comic. Gassner terms this practice as breaking a "unity of tone."95 This mixture of the serious and the comic is also noted by Thomas Dickinson and Hillett and Bentley.96 There are some secondary features of structure in romantic drama. Romantic plays may use a chronological structure often composed of many scenes.97 ‘In keeping with a chronological structure, the point 9°Hillett and Bentley, p. 11.1. 91%. 92Carpenter, p. 131.. 93Gassner, Musing thg Ply, p. 61. 9I‘Draper, p. 116. 95Gassner, Prod in the Pla , p. 61. 96Thomas H. Dickinson, An Outline of Contmm Drm (Cambridge, Mass: The Riverside Press, 1927 s P. 8, and Hillett and Bentley, p. 11.2. 97 Coop”, pe 139e :2 mix is early L 3:11:32" that. large: finch mat: mixes appear in title, is a comic: .- 42: 3:11:11, the re A7 of attack is early in the story which results in an "exposition in action" that largely replaces narrative exposition.98 French romantic plays have some characteristic features that may sometimes appear in other nations' romantic plays. Rapid action, for mcample, is a comonplace in the French drama.99 Along with this rapid action, there is often an illogical sequence of events; "scenes are usually a succession of surprises, recognitions, unforeseen and unforeseeable events, conceived in the manner of melodrama."loo In many instances the plot "leaps forward by means of overheard conversa- tions and actions beheld by concealed personages."101 French romantic drama oftm uploys prologues or epilogues to carry "the story a step onward or backward."102 Other features of the plot in French romantic drama were the re- tmtion of the five-act form in which each act was a unity "aiding with a climax and a striking final line.“103 Changes of scene were rare within the act.10b’ Plots were simple or complex, but they had to have "thrills arising from remarkable situations."los Lastly, the French romantic dramatists made "frequent use of the soliloquy."106 The content of romantic drama is concerned with the "glamorous, exciting, and admirable."lo7 It also includes "exotic settings and 98Donald Clive Stuart, The Develo t o D tic (New York: De Appleton m COe’ 1928 , pe me 99Draper, p. 171. 1002314., p. 118. wlStuart, p. 509. 102Draper, p. 119. 103Stuart, p. 508 10m. 105M" p. 509. 1°6Draper, p. 52. 10714111.“ and Bentley, p. 11.3. mm of the spec: :1ch tied with z: Ship, and the my- realistic detail p:- ' ' o , EC.‘ its use may ' Skid or ice: reels: retain ~ ”PK—MT" as - tinw £11,: nature Cftg til” 97m “wild an ‘ O Q .n “h "ms is: m an Evita V \ es “Ch 3'33... ‘41 S. % (re "N ‘1‘. C e: ‘1 A 48 pursuit of the spectacular and sensational in situation . . . ."108 Closely tied with this is an emphasis in content on "the curious, the strange, and the nwsterious."lo9 There may even be some amount of realistic detail present in the content. . . . , Romanticism is only partly opposed to Realism; its true enaw is the haclcneyed and: humdrum present, whether squalid or acadanic -- a very different thing. Snatches of realism remain very welcome to Romantic sensationalists, espec as an escape from the starched dignities of Classi- cism. lastly, nature often figures in the content of the plays. It is some- times eval "wild and untamed" nature in man.”1 Gangster In both "historical" and "secondhand" Romanticism characters odst in an mvironment and atmosphere removed from everyday life. They repreth "the idealistic and imaginative side of man."]'l3 As a result, characters in Romanticism tend to be "very strange indi- viduals in strange circumstancest "We know them; but we do not lmow anyone like them."115 They are recognizable human types but are removed from ordinary human eocperience. 108Rowe, p. 13). 109Moody, p. 2. 1101?. L. Lucas, The Decline all 0 the Romantic Id (New York: The Mamillan Co., 1937 , p. 1.7. mJohn Gassner, ed. , A Trees 0 the Theatre om Aes lus to Turgenev (revised ed.; New York: Simon and Schuster, 1951;, p. 500. nzliillett and Bentley, p. 11.1. mEdward A. Wright, A Pr er or Pla oers (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1958 , p. 88. 1143mm, p. 510. ”5.12m. In bcth types 1:111: (inclement is imicpad in ca 3:252:10 in bade artists created we “abandcxment 336: 300d sense," fir-”:95! {or telli: 55531 is prone ta 3353135, Jealousy, 5:33.616.” 0; I”uterine-4' Ram “.11! PNduct cf rim, 3:111 $121.1.- Help: in 63am 13413ng 011‘. *3? n T‘s-l.- 1+9 In both types of Romanticism, emotion plays an important part in the developnent of character. This emotional aspect of character was developed in early French and German Romanticism and is still discernible in modern Romanticism. For example, Franch romantic dramatists created characters with traits of extreme sensibility whose "abandonmalt of motion" did "more credit to their hearts than their good sense," and which often took the form of self-pity - a fondness for telling of their mental sufferings.116 Romanticism in general is prone to portray characters who are "slaves of passion, ambition, Jealousy, melancholy, avarice, [and] lust.":L17 Complexity of character is another attribute of Romanticism. In "historical'l Romanticism, "characters are conceived . . . as a complex product of a rather considerable variety of ispulses, moods, motives, and anotions."ll8 Protagonists, especially, are "likely to be complex in characterization" and even minor characters "may be individualized out of proportion to their dramatic purpose.":L19 How- ever, in "secondhand" Romanticism "there is not time for highly indi— Vidualized characterisation" and the persons in the play "are cast into types like melodrama figures."‘1"r‘,'0 It is possible that type characters may appear in "historical" Romanticism, but if they do they are usually quite complex types.121 Characters in "historical" Romanticism are usually of "royal or noble blood."]'22 Although not always "conventionally heroic ," 116Draper, pp. 2374.0. “’7pr”, p. 11.0. HMO“; and Barkley, pe We 119C00per, pe 139e wcmmtar’ pe Ble 121Draper, ppe 237-AOe 12214illett and Bentley, p. 11.1. '35 m 3‘. least "fa: maxim, cheracte '31”th Chin's: me attribute this Certain typical n19. Salim read he: hero and the “393% under desp "53% :r a crime the its. time to 3.; " ADcu‘t the 1"”- E‘s against nfi misty his in MC} “‘4‘! trmtiom 3’9... 7: :t a‘kyee ”v ta: M. I 1' J". I V We 1‘.“th 1e! ‘3. .\ fl» .7. ”(1 50 123 they are at least "fashioned on noble proportion." In "secondhand" Romanticism, characters are not usually of the aristocracy, but even here "the commonplace man is not a suitable figure" for a leading characterflzh Characters in this type of Romanticism usually have some attribute which sets than apart from ordinary human beings. Certain typical figures are connected with the romantic dramatic style. Earlier romantic writers developed the characters of the Byronic hero and the outcast from society. Both are depicted as 125 suffering under despair and ennui. Both have lives affected by a wrong or a crime they conmitted in the past}26 Both are very anotional beings, prone to self-pity.127 Both are oftml endowed with a mysterious 128 past. About the only difference between then is that the Byronic hero wars against "Fate" or a personal manly, while the outcast from society "is in revolt against the society which has wronged him."]‘;29 A third traditional figure in Romanticism, the romantic criminal, is an offshoot of the outcast from society.130 Heroines in Romanticism are often non-entities, lacking in color and personality.]‘31 Some female protagonists are "monsters of vice, . . . of ambition, and heartlessness."132 Still other female characters in earlier Romantic plays have many of the attributes of the Byronic herml33 A last funale type is the "weak woman" who is caught up in adultery and "powerless before her passion."13h This last type, .— 123Carpenter, p. 130. mlbid. 125Draper, p. 219. 126mg" p. 225. 127;hid., pp. 2374.0. 128mg," p. 230. 129mg" Fe 232e lBOIbige nllbide, pe 118. ”we BBIbide, pe 231e nthide, pe 295e tile act “iii“ in d: '04 m Emmi: d} 4.5.359 in 5134 ml like to 1:283? 3;; by: c‘macteril L. .13: far t..e cc: 3:339, for the u: t: aim-.fici 5: a: esRipley cons". .:-e. act cc:;‘; 1: L1: 1535; it, is IRS mPBSS us ~97 “1‘9 3:: CV; D€133 placed on "$2" “hi- 511, all 51 while not unique in drama (i.e., Medea and Phaedra), appears fre- quently in Romantic drama. lemmas Language in Romanticism is "beautiful and reflects life as we should like to imagine it but would rarely experience it."l35 Prosser Hall Frye characterizes the language of Romanticism as having a "pre- dilection for the coruscations of style -- for the glittering word and phrase, for the exotic and exquisite epithet."136 John Gassner states that Romanticism may uploy considerable lyricism, . . . , but the lyricism does not conform to a strict pattern like the classical choruses; it is not formal. Its dialogue is ideal (charac- ters express their thought and emotions as they would if they were endowed with a poet's faculties), the aphasia being placed on expressiveness rather than verisimilitude. To this end, all the non-illusionistic devices of the soliloquy, the aside, the direct commentary are used freely and without anyBattempt to Justify their presence realistically. 7 - Charles COOper writes that "there is an imaginative and orotund quali- ty to the dialogue . . . . Poetic diction, flights of fancy, solilo- quies and asides, rhetorical set pieces of poetic reflection . . . are 8 the common features of the romantic dialogue."13 Soliloquies, when used, are usually reflective rather than constructive. The above descriptions of language in Romanticism are applicable to "historical" Romanticism, but "secondhand" Romanticism, because it is influmced by Realism, utilizes prose in its dialogue. This prose dialogue is usually quite close in quality to that of Realism, but in g.— usuright, po 88. 136MB, pe 350 137Gasener, Prodgci_gg the Play, p. 61. DSCooper, p. 11.0. 1 m instances it Ia . aim and um mm. the 15mm all simian to 1‘ L323: cemersaLi 8": *5 type of Exact 5531’! the: media I I.. I-fi' . 393310: the ‘lt abject: cf es: 11:9 times ”SC-cf E53 of these thtq 52 some instances it may tend to ornateness and lyricism. It is mainly functional and serves to advance the plot or to reveal character. Otherwise the language of "secondhand" Romanticism attempts not to call attention to itself, but tries to pass for an approximation of ordinary conversation. Soliloquies and asides sometimes appear in this type of Romanticism, but when they do there is some attempt to justify them realistically. 2.11.9322 The major themes of the dramatic style of Romanticism involve the subjects of escape, freedom, rebellion, emotion, and moral Justice. Other thanes associated with Romanticism deal with nature and fate. Many of these thmes are oftm interrelated in a play. The general characteristic of escape in Romanticism is marked by an avoidance of themes dealing with an orderly contemporary social environment.139 This is a general tendency which may have some ex- ceptions in "secondhand" Romanticism. "Historical" Romanticism characteristically turns to "situations of social disorder and to the romantic past" for its subjects.“0 The Romantic concern for the past is but one aspect of the escapist theme of nostalgia, a longing to get away from the here and now and back to the "radiant hues of one's dreams."u‘l In Romanticism, nostalgia is not exclusively a longing for the past, but includes the more inclusive desire to avoid the the present. 139Ge.ssner, A Treasm o; the Theatre; Em Aesgzlus to 2223221. no 500- mlbid . mBabbitt , pp . 79-92. will!» P' 92' | s of {Tea .A— (3 f? '0 : "aid, WP}. I “a. I e u its heme" is a eta. s: has mites, if a nine isflvid Immanw L 59953 and the rat, I m Pmncunced £313.31 oftm ‘1 Time is a v; 'e? . Let c: in“ ”a a} i. ‘ «I 35,,th of l“ f "M‘ ‘0“ ”“8 low: ‘I he "“8 ’ unite-rt lar-z N! and amt: :: :5 A“. e ‘ c‘ News 1' r ‘4‘». H ‘a “£5. ?‘ me an”! 5. sucker Dray. ' H . Er , ;U 1"! "ée 53 TOpics of freedom and rebellion are frequently associated with Romanticism. "The untrammeled soul or the soul which seeks to break its bonds" is a characteristic theme of a great many romantic plays .143 As (hesner writes, romantic playwrights are absorbed in "the struggles of a unique individual, heroically, at odds with conventions and his mvironmmt."lu‘ In "historical" Romanticism the theme of political freedom and the rebellion against injustice, tyranny, and inequality is more pronounced than in "secondhand" Romanticism. Both types of Romanticism often include the theme of personal freedom from the limi- tations of social and moral codes.u‘5 There is a wide range of emotional subjects in Romanticism. Most of them are expressive of "inward life, moods, and anotions."lh6 Many aspects of love are covered in the themes of Romanticism including "overwhelming love at first sight,"ll'7 "the courtesan regenerated by love, "M8 adulterous love,ll‘9 and jealousy.150 Melancholy, anguish, despair, and sentiment are also manifestations of emotion in the themes of Romanticism.l5l V Melodrama's concept of moral justice can be considered a theme of "secondhand" Romanticism, and may even be found in "historical" MCarpenter, p. 130. “Gassner, Treasgn o; the Theatre: From Aesgmlus to Turgenev, pe 500. . usBrockett, p. 225. l“milieu; and Bentley, p. 11.3. 147m, p. 300. M8Albert Joseph George, The Develogent of 331m}; Romtigigg (Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press, 1955 9 P- 29. “fiDraper, p. 295. lsoCarpenter, p. 130. lslGeorge, ppe 29-32e minim. This 1 c! the virtuous ch11 re alleys rewarded the: themes : first, since the 1:. assc‘ in other 5e: 6}. O as. “ weasel-a1 is; . , ‘ I 5&1 melvmzm m *4" 5mm}, 4 . en - ‘ “A. ‘I \ .‘ IL. 1“ . 54 Romanticism. This theme is that "no matter how horrible the trials of the virtuous characters or how powerful the villainous, the good are always rewarded and the evil are always punished."152 Other themes of Romanticism are concerned with nature and fate. First, since the influence of nature on Romanticism has been dis- cussed in other sections of this chapter, it is sufficient to say that the general ideas of the essential goodness of unspoiled nature and uncivilized man are carried over into the themes of some romantic plays. Secondly, the concept of the operation of fate in man's life is not an exclusively romantic theme, but has been noted in some romantic plays. This these is evident when a hero "is subjected to an arbitrary uterual destiny from which he cannot nee himself."153 Often this theme takes the form of characters suffering because of the sins of their fathers.15h Sm: Criteria for Identification of the Dramatic Style of Romanticism Principles of Romanticism Romanticism as a dramatic style is based on general philosOph- ical theories forumlated in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. These theories advance the view that the universe and all things in it, including man, are manifestations of an absolute spirit which is in the process of becoming perfect through constant creative evolution and which can only be apprehended by the subjective mind. Thus the romantic universe is an organic one in which everything in it is a part of everything else since everything in it has a canon ‘_ 152Brockett, p. 236. 153Tymms, p. 12. 15“!)raper, p. 228. 5:12:30 Exiled-36 h‘. sezh howl gs ‘ ' .F arm “.1 t. 5? :beenaticn of «‘5‘! _ I '““* » are stud: 55 origin. Knowledge of’any part may lead to knowledge of the whole, but such knowledge is intuitive rather than rational. Drama and the other arts, guided by the theories of romantic philosophy, are created according to aesthetic principles which view the artist as a person gifted with original genius - an intuitive grasp of the universal -- which is expressed freely without regard to any established rules, conventions, or standards. The artist's sub- jective imagination is his only guide. This imagination is stimulated by observation of nature unapoiled by civilization. Details, the par- ticular, are studied because they are truer to the infinity of creation than the norms or abstractions arrived at by rational thought. The strange and grotesque, because they exist in nature, are introduced into art and are used as a contrast to beauty. The romantic revolts against society both artistically and politically because its rules interfere with the expression of his intuition. Characteristics of Romanticism. General Characteristics The first general characteristic of Romanticism is a tendency away from actuality. Enough detail and suggestion of observed reality is included to lead the reader or spectator to believe that the actions presented could or might happen. However, the feeling of actuality is .modified by the remoteness of a romantic play in time, place, or cul- ture. Romantic dramas impress one as being an escape from.everyday reality because they customarily contain elements of excitement, sensa- tion, and imagination that are not common to ordinary human experience. There is a great sense of the improbable in the drama of Romanticism. The second gear tit: and. subjectivi 11:12:61. There it were of beams. ' 1‘33, but in Rom; ‘léi: mm sake. The third gen 3951;: am an CPW 3*: mix-es of the :5. take the 1.32:: < 2332331 Order. "3 finial heedcm . The fourth g 2:111 stri ‘ t. Y‘~ «8 “ ‘-' 3 e. U ’ “Q1 be. h. ‘3 mammal Ls; ~l “‘4“ e - E “'17:. «he .‘_ e. ‘* Uh --:: Q71‘dth - a “<- V\;c .- “id be :,. ‘8' .‘Qs. Q 56 The second general characteristic of Romanticism is emotion- ality and subjectivity. Logic and common sense seem to be excluded or minimized. There is an idealization of the instinctive and non-rational powers of humans. To some degree, emotional appeal is common in all drama, but in Romanticism emotions seen to be aroused and expressed for their own sake. The third general characteristic of Romanticism is a search for freedom and an opposition to any limitations which affect the actions and desires of the individual. The rebellious quality in Romanticism may take the form of opposition to any established political, social, or moral order. "Historical" Romanticism is more likely to deal with political freedom than is "secondhand" Romanticism. The fourth general characteristic of Romanticism is an inclusion of the strange, the nwsterious, and the grotesque. A part of this characteristic is the depiction of the picturesque and local color, but this is truer of earlier Romanticism in which realistic detail was a novelty. "Secondhand" Romanticism, which superficially resembles Realism, is an extension of this aspect of early French and German Romanticism. Nevertheless, both types of Romanticism often deal with unusual, even bizarre, situations, settings, and characters. Even the supernatural and fantastic are not excluded. Physical and psycholog- ical evil and deformity can also be encompassed under this character- istic. The fifth and last gmeral characteristic of Romanticism is its concern with nature and man unspoiled by civilization. Nature is idyllic and free from the evil that, in the romantic view, civilization spawns. There is a tendency for nature to reflect the moods and actions w -‘ - .-Ie- - an”? 3 ;-.- *~*0' ‘ .. D ‘.0 -“' Plot sir-u raiiz‘7".1al uni hilly retainer emetizes subpl; 3‘“ “59 Cf ela: AJ' a .‘ “fine is broke ‘ cmcn t. t’ ":61 Stmctlu-u 9-.“' 1 he... . .Q Out. three “ii-18 or t i‘zhe' 4-1,“: m \ {~0er he 31 23:93 " ’ ‘1' " ‘ a..:1 9.34 c 3 m 2‘! 1 .. ‘d‘nmfii'zt' 57 of the characters. There is also the idea that the closer a man is to nature - the less he is influenced by civilization - the better he is. Eorm Elements Plot Plot structure in Romanticism is loose in its treatment of the traditional unities of action, time and place. The unity of action is usually retained, but action is often complicated in the main plot and sometimes subplots are enployed that add to the complexity. There is a free use of elapsed time and shifts in place are not unconmon. The unity of tone is broken by a mingling of the serious and the comic. A comon trait of plot in Romanticism is a marv-scened chrono- logical structure featuring an early point of attack with exposition carried out through action rather than narrative exposition. The un- folding of the story often appears as a series of thrills presented in a rapid melodramatic manner. The use of overheard conversations, pro- logues, and epilogues to advance the action of the plot is sometimes found in Romantic drama. Soliloquies, asides, and other rhetorical de- vices are anployed for the same purpose but are more comon to "histori- cal" Romanticism. Plot content in Romanticism usually provides for excitement, suspense, imagination, and glamor. Exotic settings, sensational situ- ations - in general, the strange and the msterious - are frequently a part of romantic content. Subject matter from the past is character- istic of "historical" Romanticism. The world of nature is often used as a setting, but is less likely to appear in "secondhand" Romanticism. a I . “esters I" "' immbat ere by mcti: sates ccraectec' SIX-pit , eats Ira-acme 326.1351, but 3731:] or mble . ""‘V'eel m""£e EV! .“IQ "‘“5 i5 Still-1.31 1 .‘ a " I .P.fle¢. ,r. Ouncu-\.“&' Site-,5: Cf Scciei 3:221:13 are t 5511: imam i finishes: ‘. . -N. h“ «‘33, The Hg 58 Character Characters in Romanticism, while not wholly unrealistic, are usually improbable persons. Their actions and reactions are guided more by «notion than reason. They are often victims of emotional states connected with love, ambition, jealousy, melancholy, despair, self-pity, mental anguish, avarice, and lust. Characters are rather complex personalities in "historical" Romanticism, but tend to be "types" in "secondhand" Romanticism. Royalty or noble persons are portrayed frequently in "historical" Romanticism. Even in "secondhand" Romanticism, the commonplace human being is seldom a leading figure. Traditional characters of Romanticism are the Byronic hero, the outcast of society, and the romantic criminal. Virtuous heroines in Romanticism are usually colorless in personality, but less reputable female characters are more complex and show traits of lust, ambition, and heartlessness. Byronic self-pity and melancholy is also found in heroines. The weak woman enslaved in adulterous passion is a favorite figure in Romanticism. Language Language in Romanticism has two forms. In "secondhand" Romanti- cism, dialogue is in prose which is primarily functional in advancing the plot. It is seldom poetically ornate. As such, it is quite simi- lar to the language. of Realism. In "historical" Romanticism, dialogue tmds to be poetic and ornate. It is often an informal lyricism, rather than a strict poetic form. Expression is idealized; characters speak with a poet's gift for language. Language often takes the form :1 reflective SL1 ages of lane-mg is, hr. if the} 23:. as a ccm'ezt V .33 has: in E 35:57:?! sceiet; “9 35‘ for its i: a one . Wh'm.‘ rim“: 3* 13°55 0: that 2‘95 0! nest,- ‘ Q ~39 amazing k 'I «ufles of :3 fl m‘gnee.‘| "fi‘ i .1: p :1: in; Codes. .-. ‘9 “.I ‘4; - “Anna: r‘ 59 of reflective soliloquies, asides, and even set speeches. These tech- niques of language are not wholly excluded from "secondhand" Romanti- cism, but if they appear they are realistically motivated - that is, there is some attanpt to treat them as a natural occurrence rather than as a convention. Thane Theses in Romanticism usually avoid ideas and problems of con- tanporary society and environment. "Historical" Romanticism turns to the past for its themes. "Secondhand" Romanticism, although often set in a contemporary environment, usually evades extensive involvement in the ideas of that environment. Both types of Romanticism often have theses of nostalgia,la desire to ignore the present and a longing to live according to one's dreams and memories. Themes of Romanticism often involve a search for freedom of the individual from political inequalities or the limitations of social and moral codes. Characters are frequently seen as rebelling against the conditions which curtail the free expression of their individu- ality or desires. The theme of political liberty is more common to "historical" Romanticism than to "secondhand" Romanticism. Themes concerning the emotions of individuals are often found in Romanticism. Typical of these themes are love at first sight, the enabling power of love, the anguish of jealousy, the despair of melancholy, and the degradation of adultery. Sentiment is also common as a thans in Romanticism. "Secondhand" Romanticism often projects the theme of strict moral justice in which the good are rewarded and the evil are punished. Cite: than asute c! eaten :iiizaticn. T3 the “ccrr'xisns‘ is at exclusive mastic drama 3-17 mural fi its being vis 60 Other thanes of Romanticism concern nature and fate. Things in a state of nature are seen as being good because they are unspoiled by civilization. This is particularly true of men who live apart from the "corruptions" of society. Fate as a determinant of man's destiny is not exclusively a Romantic theme, but is incorporated into some romantic dramas. According to this theme, man cannot escape an arbi- trary external fate. Often fate takes the form of the sins of the father being visited on his offspring. CHAPTER IV REALISM Historical Bacgmund While the last quarter of the nineteenth century is generally accepted as the period of the energetics of Realism as a significant dramatic style, it must be pointed out that traits now associated with Realism were discernible in the drama of earlier ages. Evidence of this may be found in Elizabethan middle-class tragedy and such eighteenth century plays as George Lillo's The London Merchant and Lessing's Miss Sara Sampson.l Prior to 1875 there was also a shift toward Realism in theatri- cal production. As early as 1801., a stage designer in the court theatre in Hannheim, Germany, "Joined pairs of wings that contained practicable doors or windows.“2 Goethe's autobiography included an objection to the use of the box set on the French stage.3 In England, J. R. Planche's 1821. production of King John was one of the first attempts at archaeological accuracy in production.“ Seven years later, 1Gassner, tom an; Idea . . . . , p. 5. 2Kenneth Macgowan and William Helnitz, The Living Stage (Engla- HOOd Cliffs, New Jersey: Prmtice.flall, Inc., 1955 , pe 3M0 3Ibid. ”A. Nicholas Vardac, 310m Stage to Screen (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 191.9), p. xxi. 61 lime 'iesu'is 1m 3; 5:12:11 bcx YP AI- an k nu I. .. 12:11 a tuber 01 a . I ‘II- A ' “an: mrks < 9., e' ; " '59 1:. 51- 33.". )‘I-- '1 as : -te ° 1:: 6n! 0 M» I ‘O ""‘“ Mb... 1‘ ‘T‘... «Mung :De‘, \V‘e l ‘3. u H..Q h‘ .: u."“‘~ V‘I:‘ :‘q’ ‘ 9A: . \‘e 5‘: \. - \ J"_ 6 (Nu 62 Madame Vestris introduced "surface realism in English decor,"5 and in 181.l employed box sets at the Olympic Theatre.6 In drama the first three-quarters of the nineteenth century pro- duced a number of Sporadic attempts at Realism. "Durable examples" of this are Gogol's The Insgector-General (1836), Hebbel's 1.43332 Magma (181.41.), and Turgenev's A Month in the Country (181.9) .7 The dramatic works of Egnile Augier and Alexandre Dumas Q13 in the middle of the nineteenth century also tended toward Realism. In particular, Dumas figs attempted to found a drama of "social utility" which would treat contemporary social problems.8 Dumas {$13, Augier, and others developed realistic techni ues, but it was such playwrights as Ibsen, Zola, and Shaw, along with direc- tors such as Antoine and Stanislavsky who added idea, method, and skill to technique to found a true style of Realism,9 a style fostered by sweeping changes in the western world. Although many of these changes had begun in the eighteenth century, they reached their culmination in the nineteenth century. Revolutionary developnents in agriculture, industry, science, politics, and society,lo had a notable impact on many other aspects of world 5&331131‘, 20m an Idea 0 e e e , I30 299. 6 Clayton Hamilton, The Theog of the Theatre (New York: Henry Halt and COO, 1939), p. A 0 7&331191‘, 201111 and Idea 0 e e e , pe 50 8Brocllzett, p. 263. 9&35ner, Eom am Idea 0 e e e , pe 5e loAlan S. Downer ed. , (heat World Theatre (New York: Harper and Row, Publishers, 1961. , p. 1.81.. aim, including inimnts led 1 fikisfl was inzicn and 2' o: ccncazitar.‘ nth the can: waits): - o enrolling r. After its 3, 32.1: anal". :vetieih cat127- stir Fir-.5 Pine:- am”, Kid ASE? Lacs. 63 culture, including drama. The concern of playwrights with these developnents led to the realistic dramatic style. [Realisg] was the result -- or concomitant - of the urban- ization and mechanization of life, . . . . It was the result -- or concomitant ~— of danocratic reformism, of the new concern with the condition of the people. It was the result - or con- comitant - of the rise of physical sciencesflhich aimed at controlling nature by knowing its processes. After its growth in the last quarter of the nineteenth century, Realism attained a position as the dominant dramatic style of the twentieth century. Among its notable practitioners were England's Arthur Wing Pinero, Henry Arthur Jones, and John Galsworthy, Russia's Chekhov, and America's migene O'Neill, Arthur Miller, and Tennessee Williams. Principles of Realism The view of the world and man in Realism is an outgrowth of a number of more inclusive ideas and concepts which have shaped the modern world. Realism may be incorporated "within a larger historical or philosophical framework -- which will be that of some form of modern scientific anpiricism."12 Realism is "a by-product of the scientific movement."l3 The development of the realistic style was influenced by a general tendency of man to turn more and more to science and scientific method for solu- tions to problems generated by the rapid and revolutionary changes in the nineteenth century. 11mm Bentley, The Play-Eight as Thinker (New York: Reynal and HitCthCk, 19106), Fe 230 lzlbide, p0 250 1314mm. and Bentley, p. 11.6. One of the - mm as th ; (1793—1257).“ c.. ssi: for has: is. .415 ml: be 113: jettive method of used one idea 1; 33583.13, He c hfidée to see; {xiiiive social 5 50 less 1;; high: in the n; .15.:- 133 Dag-yin i: and We Page: "a 1 h ‘5. "mm 0: t'r liq; . n15 .8 6h One of the major influences on the growth of the scientific movanent was the philosophy of positivism, eXpressed by Auguste Comte (1793,1357),1h Comte held that observation of fact was the only solid basis fer human knowledge and that from.such observation invariable laws could be discovered. In effect, he postulated a scientific, ob- jective method of dealing with the phenomena of existence. He ad- vanced one idea in particular that had great relevance to the growth of Realism. He called for the application of scientific or positive knowledge to social phenomena. He felt that the establishment of a positive social science would promote order throughout society.15 No less influential than positivism to the shaping of scientific thought in the nineteenth century were the doctrines set ferth by Charles Darwin in his book, The Origin of Species. Darwin's book con- tained two major concepts: "evolution, or the idea that all forms of life have developed gradually from a common ancestry; and . . . the survival of the fittest, as an explanation of the reason for evolu— tion."16 The works ofWHarx also had considerable influence on the historical and philosOphical milieu of Realism. Marx emphasized the conditioning effect of environment on human behavior, but contended that the circumstances of environment could be changed by man..17 He thus advanced the concept of change in human behavior and society. lSAlburey Castell, An Introduction to Mod Philoso (New York: The Mam C00, 1963 , pp. 217.26. l6Brockett, p. 261. 17Hatlen, p. 162. The prime: :2 the ninetee'f 5131!: cf 12“" AU“. 13%;: create e "F . . “e e“ ~35 3.65 E... '. 54%.: cf 'F‘ ““va V. "e 83TH)... .v“. 65 The principles of Realism as a dramatic style stem from the general ideas of Comte, Darwin, Marx, and other intellectual leaders of the nineteenth century. From these ideas, playwrights evolved a style of writing, but not necessarily a program for "realistic" dramatic creation. There is no single source for the formulation of the principles of Realism. The number of dramatists and their various anployments of Realism make it impossible to render precise descrip- tions of the views underlying Realism. At best, only the general bases of realistic thought can be advanced. First, Realism adopts the methods and views of science. It stops short of the experimental aspects of science, however, and concentrates on "meticulous and precise observation, analysis, and recording of specific details."l8 As a result, Realism is limited to the anpirical aspects of science. Another effect of the scientific influence on dramatic art is the concept of man as a natural object. Man becomes, in this view, "another object for study and control."19 "He is a case study, capable of being examined and investigated."20 Second, Realism views heredity and environment as the two main factors which shape human character. Man is a product of the inter- actions of the pmsical attributes he is born with, the conditions which surround him, and his will. "His physiolog is as important as lBHatlen, p. 12.7. l9Brockett, p. 261. 20H:t1en, p. 11.1.. his intellect 1: its effects age as armament night . It is the menace" ‘.j_; :‘ P‘ e.“ .215 theme. “Maple: 4!» -..' _ "4; him“: a. 18:1 in Realism they hike-.2311 mi" °f treat: 66 his intellect in determining his conduct."21 Although heredity and its effects appealed as subject matter to a number of dramatists, it was environment that held a special fascination for realistic play- wrights. It is the concept of environment "as a dynamic element of human experience" which marks the modernity of Realism.22 More importantly, it is "the idea of the stage as an environment, rather than as simply or mainly a platform for acting, that effected fundamwtal changes in dramatic art."23 Environment has a double influence on Realism. Con- tmt in Realism was affected by depicting the environmental factors as they influenced character, and the conventions of Realism were a result of treating the stage itself as environment. Thirdly, the concern with scientific empiricism and the factors of heredity and environment are linked to a principle of Realism which anbraces the idea of progress in improving human relations and behavior. This view stems from a philosophical-historical assumption which was aug- mented by Darwin's theory of evolution. "If man has evolved from an infinitesimal grain of being to the complex creature he is now, greater and greater improvanent and inevitable progress seen to be clearly indicated."2h "The notion of progress is essentially associated with the theory that science will necessarily continue to increase the sum of human knowledge, and the possibilities of human conquest in the world of Nature, . . . ."25 Progress, although supposedly inevitable, allatlm, p. 11.1.. 22635an, Eorm and Idea , . . . , p. 23. 231nm, p. 19. 21‘31‘061‘6‘“. , p e 261 e 2Sliugh Sykes Davies, Realism in the Dry (London: Cambridge University Press, 1931.), p. 91.. was believn to h min: aSpects o The concept tion to iealisz. realistic play-Hr: is much em 1', strate the Opera: Primes is Ere “'9 in Red of C] a: social iii 1‘ is i‘Lf"ii‘.£:‘.'10.:1 is t the “311m: ct 67 was believed to be accelerated by applying scientific method to the various aspects of human existence.26 The concept of progress requires some qualification in its rela— tion to Realism. It is more aptly an assumption on the part of the realistic playwrights rather than stated doctrine or program. Progress is implicit but not necessarily explicit. Realistic drama could demon- strate the Operation and effect of progress directly but the idea of progress is more often implied in drama which depict conditions which are in need of change. In such dramas, a supposedly objective picture of social difficulties and problems only reveals the status guo. The implication is that if some action were taken to deal with then, then the resultant change would lead to progress. It is also possible that realistic drama may be used as a stimulus to the society in general to make it aware of problems in order that it may turn its attention to them. All in all, the idea of progress is related to the principles of Realism, although this relation is not always imnediately obvious. The last principle of Realism is that it attanpts to be "true to life."' According to Kenneth Thorpe Rowe, The aim of realism, . .1 . , is truth to life, inner and uni- versal; but what distinguishes realism is truth to life in uternal and particular detail. Realism as a method ascertains truth bg7observation and communicates it by direct represen- tation. While Rowe's statmnent seems clear enough and is representative of a number of other statmnents by various critics, it glosses over a disa- greement among critics about how true Realism actually is to life. 26Brockett, p. 261. 27Rowe, p. 180 . The ergmem Em state m: mentors, beca tion bet—veer Real: it: to repeat th. trait as a reproc‘: literal picture 0; hilt Strindberg t L‘s: “It the g i: this sezse is 3 ms’fiticn." I: tritics believe t. i‘~'.~i:tic:1 or the tree to the 1 “9111‘s cu "’59 0! heir Pests and in 3331131, and ' m? held Up t 68 The argument about the nature of "truthfulness to life" in Realism stans from two differing conceptions of the style. Some commentators, because they believe there is little, if any, distinc- tion between Realism and Naturalism, lay stress upon the realist's duty to repeat the very look of life. They say that Realism sees truth as a reproduction of reality since it demands "a more or less literal picture of people and happenings."‘28 This view of Realism is what Strindberg characterized as "photograply which includes every- thing, even the grain of dust on the lens of the camera."29 Realism in this sense is parallel to what Henry James called the "emotion of recognition." It might be termed journalistic reporting. Other critics believe that the "truth to life" in Realism is more than the depiction of the externals of reality. They feel that Realism is true to the deeper motives of human character and to the underlying currents of social development; not in the sense of being photographically reflective of other as- pects and irrelevant details. It does not strain to be natural, and yet it is never unnatural. The mirror is not held up to life, but life is subjected to a rigid selective sense, and through that transformed into art.30 In this study the concept that Realism is "true to life" in the sense of being true to the obvious external aspects of the world of observed reality is not accepted as a principle of Realism. This con- cept is more germane to Naturalism which is treated separately here as 28Kenneth Macgowan and Robert Edmund Jones, Continental Stage- m (New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co., 1922), pp. h—S. 29August Strindberg, "On Modern Drama and Modern Theatre," Pla 1 ts on Pla itin , ed. Toby Cole (New York: Hill and Wang, 1960;, p. 17. 30Sheldon Cheney, The Theatre: Three Thousand Y s 0 Dr Act and S ecra (rev. ed. New York: Longmans, Gram, 1952 , P0 350 tire-nth style. mettle with t‘. This steely that it apprcxizm name of drazati illusion of real: the selecticn , a M W- ‘4 J4- !" “ii: t ”tease. ‘ e u 69 a dramatic style. In effect, so-called photographic realism is more compatible with the naturalist's theory of the "slice-of-life."31 This study accepts the idea that Realism is "true to life" in that it approximates "real life as close as is compatible with the nature of dramatic illusion."32 Realism attempts to produce the illusion of reality rather than rgroduce life itself. In Realism the selection, arrangenent, and "manipulation of observed fact result in the revelation of hidden or more general truths than accurate re— production of the apparmt reality would yield."33 Characteristics 0; Realism General Characteristics Realism has been used to identify a wide variety of plays which range "from the plain reportorial or slice-of-life sort over near Naturalism, to the anotionally condensed sort over near Romanticism."3h Millett and Bentley describe three types of realists as follows: [ A . . right wing which J grasps only partially the implications of the scientific point of view, is likely to share a fairly hard-headed sentimentalist's views of human character, [and] to judge his characters and their behavior unconsciously in accordance with the mores of his own social group. There is, besides, an important type of realist . . . that not only does not attempt the objectivity of the scientist but earnestly espouses a par- ticular standard of morals and philosoptw, and uses the drama to express his social purpose and his social criti- cism. . . . The left-wing realist is the type of artist gho in continental criticism is usually called a naturalist. 5 31$ee Chapter v, "Naturalism,"pp. 87-88. 32Damon, p. 119. 33 Alan S. Domer, Rim Years of Amgican Drama; lm-lfifi (Chicago: Henry Regnery Co., 1951 , p. 61.. Bhuhmey, We: 0 e e e , pe #500 3511111.“ and Bentley, p. 11.7. Desgite the e :iin‘im, they a] the as similar in ’1. catamaran u 3) an aphasis an tics, and S) sele: details (to: act: Realism, r; ”35393137 see: 70 Despite the diversity of plays which may fall under the category of Realism, they all contain some general characteristics which mark them as similar in style. These characteristics are l) depiction of the contemporary world, 2) a reliance on the concept of environment, 3) an emphasis on the element of character, 1.) the fourth-wall conven- tion, and 5) selection and arrangement in the imitation of actions and details from actual life. Realism, with few exceptions, "is primarily concerned with the contanporary scene, contemporary people, contemporary ideas and ideals . . . ."36 This characteristic is traceable to the historical- philosophical background in which Realism developed. As T. W. Hatlen observes, ”when a. society becomes concerned primarily with the physical and material aspects of living based on sense knowledge, then the artist looks to real life for his means of expression."37 Given the general thoughts and attitudes of the late nineteenth century, it is logical that dramatists would create plays which "restrict themselves to the minute observation of man in the ordinary and eternal conflicts of daily life."38 Immediacy is a basic concern in Realism. In a realistic drama, "the background . . . is immediate in time and place to the author and his audience, specific in locale, and treated with fidelity to physi- cal facts and social manners."39 Characters in the drama of Realism are "normal to the background, more often than not representative."l‘0 36Heffner, Seldon, and Sellman, p. 73. 37Hatlen, p. 11.3. 38Downer, 21:92 Years 0 e e e , p. 53. 39Rowe, p. 181. 4011331,. Desi“ the 353911151: they the-'35 5m i the cpxtcpil’irl. A, ' I :13“ @3315 0: time 3:11 5) 5%: details 3‘0": C: Realism: ‘ was?“ 53' heels - . . 3; ficscphical b scarves, “fig? er. a: r1411 «15 artist locks t: gearel thcugh‘ 1 . 70 Despite the diversity of plays which may fall under the category of Realism, they all contain some general characteristics which mark than as similar in style. These characteristics are l) depiction of the contemporary world, 2) a reliance on the concept of environment, 3) an emphasis on the element of character, I.) the fourth-wall conven- tion, and 5) selection and arrangement in the imitation of actions and details from actual life. Realism, with few exceptions, "is primarily concerned with the contemporary scene, contemporary people, contemporary ideas and ideals . . . ."36 This characteristic is traceable to the historical- philosophical background in which Realism developed. As T. W. Hatlen observes, "when a. society becomes concerned primarily with the physical and material aspects of living based on sense knowledge, then the artist looks to real life for his means of expression."37 Given the general thoughts and attitudes of the late nineteenth century, it is logical that dramatists would create plays which "restrict thenselves to the minute observation of man in the ordinary and eternal conflicts of daily life."38 Immediacy is a basic concern in Realism. In a realistic drama, "the background . . . is immediate in time and place to the author and his audience, specific in locale, and treated with fidelity to physi- cal facts and social manners."39 Characters in the drama of Realism are "normal to the background, more often than not representative."l"0 36H°ffner, Seldon, and Sellman, pe 73. 37113191311, pe 111.30 38Downer, Eim Years . . . . , p. 53. 39Rowe, p. 181. “01mg. 'etile the an; gist my be trea‘ Arthur filler is a tecec‘ er striking fight the conth Aseccnd gas the accept of em' acters are treated latter crtn intro imitating details enter" at: was tre “a Tact-liar. but, a In Realise: t 71 While the emphasis in Realism is on the contemporary, a past period may be treated in a realistic manner.“ The Crucible by Arthur Miller is a notable example of this. Exceptions, however es- teemed or striking, do not alter the general tendency in Realism to depict the contemporary world. A second general characteristic of Realism is its emphasis on the concept of environment. In Realism the surroundings of the char- acters are treated as more than the "local color" of Romanticism, the latter often introduced for novelty. Realists expanded the idea of imitating details of a particular locality and introduced environ- ment which was treated "not merely as the background for a dramatic complication but as the foreground itself."l‘2 In Realism the particular handling of environment is signifi- cant. The realistic playwright avoids presenting the details of the observable world for their own sake. He wishes to express "an aware- ness of kinetic relations between the individual and society."43 De- tails, both material and social, are selected to show the 231293: of environment on the characters portrayed. The dramatist presents "convincing representations of meaningful experiences ,"u‘ not a totality of experience fiom the actual world of reality. In Realism, environment is not anployed to deceive the audience into believing what they are witnessing is like life in the actual world. It is “Hermer, Seldon, and Bellman, p. 73. l‘2John Gassner, A Treasu o the Theatre: om Henrik Ibsen to Arthur Miller, (rev. ed.; New York, Simon and Schuster, 1950;, p. 30 “mssner, row and Idea 0 o o o, p. 630 “Ibido red to help the ta: at its mat ex Ln aphasia matteristic 0: Principal object in mid, coast: to :L’sracter pot. and action that. . F153 thasize \ ‘ - ‘ 4'19 '0 neallsm‘ 5 the a v *‘u . “eat,” and 33115:, I I ha 7? uh W3 ;ch , 71A ‘used to help the spectator perceive the relation between human charac- ter and its material and social surroundings. I An emphasis on the form element of character is a third general characteristic of’Realism as a dramatic style. In Realism."the principal object of imitation is always man; description of the mater- ial world, construction of plot, are thus subsidiary and contributory to character portrayal."45 Realism.attempts to present both people and action that are familiar to the audience but the "best realistic plays emphasize characterization rather than complicated plotting."A6 Due to Realismfs imitation of details of the observable world, the realist commonly "is driven to an exacting study of the surface mani- festations of character."l‘7 In its form relationships, Realism empha- sizes the element of character, but not to the point where other elements lack relative importance. A fOurth general characteristic of Realism.is the so-called "fburthawall convention." This identifying characteristic is actually more apparent in the theatrical production of realistic drama, but it can be perceived in the manner of writing plays in the style of ‘Realism. The assumption of this convention did much to change the art of theatre and drama and to dictate most of the other conventions of realistic theatrical style."8 In Realism this convention provides for the presentment of the material of’a play "in the manner and sequence LSHatlen, p0 1450 héLodwick Hartley and Arthur Ladu, Patterns in Modern (New York: Prenticeqflall, Inc., l9h8), pp.8-9. ”Milieu and Bentley, p. 150. hfibmm,p.4&p 2: actual life, a RNA; ACCCI‘i tram are “811pr “110! am livi audience permiu Wit their eve: PM Selective tech? 5;“ , p "r 1c». “* (19 “"7 “7&3; 72 of actual life, as though people were being watched through a peep- h9 According to the fourth-wall convention, characters in a hole." drama are "supposed to be seen as they would be seen if the fourth ‘wall of any living room.or bedroom were suddenly removed and an .audience permitted to watch unsuspecting, everyday mortals going about their everyday business in an everydaymanner."5O Finally, a general characteristic exhibited by Realism as its selective technique in portraying actual life. In realistic drama it is essential that the actions of the characters and the setting of 'the play he accepted as a "true" picture of life.51 It need not be a total, inclusive picture, however. The "true" picture presented in .Realism.is accomplished by the suggestion of reality (rather than by its actual photographic depiction) through a process of selection. .Realistic plays commonly "give the impression of being the real thing ‘without including the infinity of unnecessary and confusing detail one might find in real 11mm” In short, Realism pictures life, "but not in stark photographic detail. Rather it selects, arranges, and discards."53 49Gassner, Producin the Pla , pp. 53-5ho 50mm, p. 1.8“. 51hr)? McCarthy, "Realism in the American Theatre," Harper's ccmn (July, 1961). 1.9. SgRichard Corson, "Styles of Scene Design," Dramatics Ma azine, m (19474.8) . 5. 53Wright , pp 0 89“” o '1?! . l C) r. In Eealis: mattress, 2) a theatrical acme: We“: steal. E83115: a: Q‘ at ' P‘i'vs ls athieq'. . ‘ . ‘ t, d3fl13e5,11’1 "n. H 3315:,"56 T :7 "item“, CC F c. .4; ‘ «LS Hunt ‘E '0 \ H r. Ii «33;? | “‘ 73 Form Elements M In Realism the element of plot is marked by l) a structural compactness, 2) a late point of attack, 3) an attempt to reduce theatrical conventions to a minimum, and A) the use of contemporary story material. Realism exhibits a "compactness of form that has not been known since the time of the Greeks."5h This compactness in realistic plots is achieved by "organic means" rather than "by means of tricks and devices,"55 which are melodramatic and are therefore "foreign to Realism."56 The compactness of structure in Realism is characterized- by "careful construction, exposition, and motivation."57 It commonly adheres closely to the three unities, "for it is likely to be econ- omical in its shift of time and place and to the use of a single plot."58 A secondary plot technique appears to be the employment of the late point of attack. The plot tends to concentrate the action at the moment of crisis.59 This late point of attack leads dramatists to adopt Realism's "retrospective method of playwrighting,"60 which is related to the tendency toward compactness in realistic plays. 51+Sheldon Cheney, The New Movement in the Theatre (New York: Mitchell Dennerley, 19115.3. 36. " "' 5SGassner, Eorm and Idea . . . . , p. 35. 56011311”, New Movanmt c c c c , p0 [+5. ”Cooper, p. 140. 581bid. 59McCarthy, p. 1.6. wmssnm‘, EOIE and Idea 0 c c o , p. 320 I: ‘ r A A. a if...“ Ch‘lrde‘ hint to rain: I ‘ | ”fin I § 0‘ Q l . we» the ‘5. having of er); nan of t:. '11-; fi' . "E! ‘A-6 . Redeem-3:5 c f scene." Eclj are Later; 3‘3: cl": be 3‘31 C3323“: ‘ 7'41- . ‘ 6‘7 “.9 5:31. “".‘h I i‘ "‘3 a}. 5.1:; 3“" .' . may ‘5 al: “eas chh‘ u.‘ ‘ m ‘L. ‘-\‘::'a‘ “a 71+ A third characteristic of plot structure in Realism.appears to be the attempt to reduce theatrical convention to a minimum,61 in order to produce the illusion of everyday reality.62 One technique is the weaving of eXposition into the rising plot action.63 The minimiza- tion of theatrical convention is perceptible in the omission of great complications of plot and climaxes, and the de-emphasis of the "big scene."6h Soliloquies and asides, both obvious theatrical conventions, are eliminated from realistic plots.65 iMany critics indicate that the plot material in Realism.should be from.contemporary life. Cooper, IOr example, claims that contempor- ary life should be the source for all plot material,66 and Gassner goes further by saying that the treatment of the character's contemporary environment as a factor in the determination of human conduct and destiny is also an attribute of story material in Realism.67 The ;practice of choosing content from.contemporary life is all but absolute in Realism; however, there are some exceptions. Content from.past jpiriods has appeared in realistic plays, but has been treated in terms of ideas contemporary to the author and his audience. Character The element of character in Realism.can be described in terms of four factors. They are 1) social class, 2) plausibility, 3) complexity, 6lRowe, p. 181. 6209.88ner, Produ in the Pla , p. 62. 63Cheney, New Movement . . . . , pp. 75-76. 61541119“ and Bentley, pp. lh8-lh9. 65Gassner, Eorm.and Idea . . . . , p. 30. 66Cooper, p. 1A0. 67Gassner, Eogm and Idea . . . . , p. 37. 7A A third characteristic of plot structure in Realism appears to be the attanpt to reduce theatrical convention to a minimum,61 in order to produce the illusion of everyday reality.62 One technique is the weaving of exposition into the rising plot actionf>3 The minimiza- tion of theatrical convention is perceptible in the omission of great complications of plot and climaxes, and the de-emphasis of the "big scene."6h Soliloquies and asides, both obvious theatrical conventions, are eliminated from realistic plots.“ Many critics indicate that the plot material in Realism should be Dom contemporary life. Cooper, for example, claims that contempor- ary life should be the source for all plot material ,66 and Gassner goes further by saying that the treatment of the character's contanporary environment as a factor in the determination of human conduct and destiny is also an attribute of story material in Realism.67 The practice of choosing content from contemporary life is all but absolute 1n Realism; however, there are some exceptions. Content from past period: has appeared in realistic plays, but has been treated in terms of ideas contemporary to the author and his audience. Character The element of character in Realism can be described in terms of four factors. They are 1) social class, 2) plausibility, 3) complexity, ——.—— 6:I'Rowe, p. 181. 62Gassner, Produ in the Pla , p. 62. 63Chmey, New Movanent c c 04 , pp. 75'760 6I‘Hillett and Bentley, pp. 11.8-11.9. 65%331181', F011". and Id 0 o c c , p. 300 66000per, p. 11.0. 67Gassner, EOE and Idea . . . . , p. 37. . .‘C‘; . m‘ i.) the mist ion Realism in b: grating taxi .23 tetiiile class, i M‘s, the men is the premium heat-steam cer 3113 egg-fled, class m the pea Cher-asters Z“*9.ilaihr‘egizt h min that an 1 Mimi? trim EM tries to m :‘rtil‘atiernfi imam d: 98 K4 is "H r ‘ ”ugh 1: tr. 75 and it) the relation of character to his environment. Realism may be employed to depict any level of society, but the prevailing tendency in realistic drama is to portray characters from the middle class, the lower middle class, and the working class.68 Today, the comon man -- whether ordinary, humble or downtrodden -- is the predominant figure in realistic drama.69 Earlier Realism of the nineteenth century featured characters from the middle class. As Realism expanded, characters were drawn more and more from the working class and the peasantry.70 Characters in realistic drama are "credible men and womel."7l The playwright in Realism "attempts to present types of people and action that are familiar to us."72 "The characters are treated with particular truth to individual lives and personalities."73 Overall, Realism tries to be "faithful and accurate" in its "rendition of life and character."7h However, faithfulness and accuracy in rendering characters does not mean a rigid c0pying of observable reality. It is enough if the characters in Realism present the illusion of being plausible, probable human entities. Characters in Realism are relatively more complex in their make- up than those in older foms of drama. They are "composites of a large number of varying and contradictory impulses."75 Realistic W éficCarthy, p. 15.5. 69Hatlen, p0 1490 70Gassner, Treasu_11 of the Theatre: Ibsen to Tiger . . . . , p- h- 71 J. N. Marriott, Modern Drama (London: Thomas Nelson and Sons, LtdO, nOdO), P0 570 72Hartley and Ladu, p. 8. 7AM 75 . illett and Bentley, p. 151. Iblg., p. 150. 73Rowe, p0 1810 flamigits o; It is peculiai . , 77 Reva. It is a] girl to char-ac the imer cris 76 playwrights often reveal their characters as "individuals with con- flicting psychological drives, products of heredity and environment."76 It is peculiar to realistic drama that often such conflicts go unre- solved.77 It is also common in Realism that the imitation of action in re- gard to character is not that of "violent physical action as much as the inner crisis, thus penetrating the surface and giving insight into their (characters!) desires, aspirations, and frustrations.”8 The inner, or psychological-social, complexity of character in Realism is accompanied by a complexity of detail in the external aspects of character, such as dress, manners, and physical appearance. The realist spends much effort on the "surface manifestations of charac- ter."79 In dealing with the relationship of character to heredity and enviromnent, realists did not overemphasize the mechanistic and animalistic aspects of man as did the naturalists. "The realist found it possible to show both sides of man and dealt. with many char- acters who were close to the norm in behavior and outlook." Langgge Prose is generally considered to be a mandatory characteristic of Realism.81 The dialogue is natural, even colloquial at times. In 76Bstlen, p. 11.9. 77Miuett and Bentley, p. 150. 79 78Hatlen, p. 11.9. Millett and Bentley, p. 150. 80 Hatlen, p. 150. 81See, for example, Gassner, Treasm of the Theatre: Ibsen to Miller, p. 3; Wright, p. 89; Millett and Bentley, p. 150; Cooper, p. 11.0; and Rowe, p. 183. v-u. speech patterns mmst. It is lineate cl‘sr'octe csssicn is ofter “lW’lih it is a 501-19 influence < tecbmcil haven 77 addition, the dialogue should be functional, with individualizing speech patterns and dialects, and even personalized details of human interest. It is utilitarian, "serving to advance the plot or de- lineate character, rather than to call attention to itself."82 Dis- cussion is often considered to be an important feature in Realism.83 Although it is a part of the dialogue of realistic style, it has same influence on plot, too. G. B. Shaw, when he wrote of the technical novelty in Ibsen's plays, pointed out that the structure of the "wellemade" play (exposition, situation, and unravelling) had been changed by Ibsen to exposition, situation, and discussion. Shaw felt that "the introduction of the discussion and its develop- ment until it so overspreads and interpenetrates the action that it finally assimilates it, making the play and discussion practically identical" was the factor that aided in separating Ibsen and post- Ibsen drama from.previous dramaturgical practice. Discussion is "a manifestation of a critical spirit that helps shape the modern realistic play and to give it a significance well above that of merely pictorial realism."86 In.Realism, psychologi- cal conflicts and social situations "can provide engrossing drama when they are presented largely through discussion or argument."87 82Hatlen, p. 151. 830assner, Eorm and Idea . . . . , p. 1.2. 84George Bernard Shaw, The Quintessence of Ibsenism.(New York: Hill and Wang, node), p0 1710 85%., 13° 1&0 86685an, £012 and Idea. 0 o o o , p. A20 871mm, pp. 43-41.. 78 .22222 The word which most appropriately describes the themes of Realism is "humanitarian." There is a general Spirit in realistic plays which evinces a deep concern for contemporary social problems, 88 Cheney calls this general and contemporary individual human problems . concern a "sympathetic interest in the common man."89 Such concern and interest leads realists to demonstrate in their plays that man alone is responsible for his current plight. They attempt to indicate that social change is needed or to direct the path of change. Particular thenes deal more specifically with the humanitarian spirit. They treat individual man's psychological problems, his duty to share ethical relationships with his fellow man, and his responsi- bility to social institutions. Society's obligation to each individual, family relationships, sex, and economic conflicts also appear in the themes of Realism.9O Sm: Criteria for the Identification of the Dramatic Style of Realism Principles Realism is strongly influenced by science and adopts the methods of scientific anpiricism in which man is seen as an object for study and control. Realism is concerned with the objective treatment of heredity and environment as major influences on human character. Realism is also linked to an idea of inevitable progress which can be 88Cooper, p. 140. 89Cheney, New Movanent in the Theatre, p. 38. 9°Hatlen, p. 151. ..ee:'sd up by scc. aunts tc be ”t: semble wcrld, b‘. obsen'able facts ._ . ‘ m :Racver. “,‘e at his Sui-rein: 1931115 2: er. ‘V’ l} Rains: : :Twa'lt ngt 0:1; 5! .he drama. “91113;; i: Sifwlds am max :19?» CR and a!" 79 speeded up by social action based on the methods of science. Realism attempts to be "true to life" not only in closely imitating the ob- servable world, but also in selecting, arranging, and manipulating observable facts to reveal hidden or general truths and patterns. Characteristics of Realism General Characteristics Realism is primarily involved with imitating the contemporary, immediate world of man and society. Historical periods may be imi- tated in a realistic manner, although such imitation is rare. Realism emphasizes the concept. of environment in relation to character. The perception of the relationship between the individual and his surroundings is a primary aim, rather than mere copying of the details of environment. Realism emphasizes the form element of character more than any other element. Realism also generally observes the fourth-wall convention, apparent not only in production, but also as an influence on the form of the drama. Realism imitates life but does not reproduce it. Realism selects and arranges the asPects of life presented on stage. This selection and arrangement aids in distinguishing Realism from Natural- ism, since both styles imitate the details of empirical reality. Eorm Elanents Plot Realistic plots are marked by structural compactness, late point of attack, reduction of theatrical convention, and the use of steeiad up by social 2 starts to be "true 1 smble world, but a: cheer-able facts to re Realism is prim \‘va— ‘4. saint} mrld cf 2‘1... tated 311 a realist" ~- Q AV“ .3 teens: 2:5? 312.: O 79 Speeded up by social action based on the methods of science. Realimn .attempts to be "true to life" not only in closely imitating the ob- servable world, but also in selecting, arranging, and manipulating observable facts to reveal hidden or general truths and patterns. Characteristics of Realism General Characteristics Realism is primarily involved with imitating the contemporary, immediate world of man and society. Historical periods may be imi- tated in a realistic manner, although such imitation is rare. Realism.amphasizes the concept of environment in relation to character. The perception of the relationship between the individual and his surroundings is a primary aim, rather than.mere copying of the details of environment. Realism.emphasizes the form element of character more than any other element. Realism.also generally observes the fourthawall convention, apparent not only in production, but also as an influence on the form of the drama. Realism.imitates life but does not reproduce it. Realism selects and arranges the aspects of life presented on stage. This selection and arrangement aids in distinguishing Realism from.Natural- ism, since both styles imitate the details of empirical reality. Eorm.Elements Plot Realistic plots are marked by structural compactness, late point of attack, reduction of theatrical convention, and the use of scion-scary stcry rate:- 23m. lets commonly a .‘ .‘ ' ' -0 321.31. Caucus, traces!“ Characters in Real "9 15?. oftm members c ”C111 position, they a: masters are relative} calcite-up. Often the: “Pests or the drama p credit; and mummy“ Li«Tings The dialogue of I: tea . Batu-u t0 the ‘Qcticnal e mt . 1” er than cf. Elie Disc 1410?“. 1.1851011 kid 4 K. \c 8O contemporary story material. RetrOSpective exposition is employed often. Plots commonly adhere to the unities of time, place, and action. Obvious, theatrical "plotting" is avoided. Character Characters in Realism can be drawn from any social class, but are most oftel members of'5 the middle and low classes. Regardless of social position, they are portrayed as credible, probable peeple. Characters are relatively complex in their physical and psychologi- cal make-up. Often their psychological conflicts are important aspects of the dramas in which they appear. They are influenced by heredity and environment. Characters are close to the norm in be- havior and outlook. Language The dialogue of Realism is always written in prose. It appears to be natural to the character and his position. It is primarily Motional rather than ornamental. It seldom calls attention to it- self. Discussion and argumelt often are an integral part of the dialogue. Theme Realistic plays demonstrate a "humanitarian" concern for con- temporary man and society. Their themes usually revolve around responsibility -- man's responsibility to himself, his family, his fellow man, and his society, as well as society's responsibility to its individual members. T-" 2: . . «fie ..eahs:, 2.5 cfthe nineteenth ca... " ' 7‘- ... ~ . mums attztudes u are m been 3029 m n m: 3.7m; thm Her ——_- 'h r1 4 1 W (13”2).n* 0' ‘n.’ ‘ us novel, 75.31;“ 1 a & ‘ '4’ Mt» " t1: a “llama p“ 1:13! renew .. 1n hi3 footsten N I 1“” hares n W ”meg a LVQ e 33m to CHAPTER V NATURALISM Historical Background Like Realism, Naturalism in drama developed in the last quarter of the nineteenth century in response to changes in the social and intellectual attitudes of the western world. Prior to this time, there had been some "important forerunners" of the naturalistic drama, "among them Henriette Mare’chal (1865), by the Goncourts; g Revolte (1870). by Villiers de l'Isle-Adam; [any Daudet's L'Arlesienne (1872)."1 However, it was finile Zola's dramatization of his novel, The’re‘ase R in, in 1873 which marked the beginning of a consciously naturalistic style.2 More important that the play was Zola's challeiging preface to it which led other playwrights to follow in his footsteps .3 After Ihe’r‘ese Ram, Zola continued to contribute plays and provocative essays to the cause of Naturalism. His collection of essays, dealing with the theoretical aspects of Naturalism was pub- lished in 1881 under the title of Le Naturalisme au the’fitre. This event spurred a developing trend toward naturalistic playwriting lGorelik, p. 133- Zulu-311cc, " word Companion to the Theatre, p. 291. Baatlm’ p. 158. amid by the 3?? and La Parisierzte (135 Kat's-slim in t3: htcime when he {cards :21: contributions we:- izmrical style, his ' 115° pmvided Exposure 15:1: in style, and he {harms Wiat‘calisz: as a 1 - ”6 ~91. Yet, in the 1; sever al rammed mature T": ' mus nations. R‘dSSj 5": - ‘ 30mm PM“. (ix-Q 82 exemplified by the appearance of Henri Becque's The Vultures (1882) and La Parisienne (1885). Naturalism in theatrical production was fostered by Andre] Antoine when he founded the Theatre—Libra in 1887.“ Although.Antoine's main contributions were important to the develOpment of a naturalistic theatrical style, his Theatre-Libra in its brief existence (1887—1894) also provided eamosure for over forty dramas, most of them natural- istic in style, and helped transform the "character of the French theatre."5 "Naturalism as a conscious movement was largely ended by 1900."6 Yet, in the last two decades of the nineteenth century, several renowned naturalistic plays were written by dramatists of various nations. Russia's Leo Tolstoi shocked the Victorian era with his sordid peasant drama, The Power of Darkness (1886). In Sweden, a letter from Zola praising The father led August Strindberg to create a masterpiece of Naturalism, Miss Julie (1888).7 A year later the German playwright, Gerhart Hauptmann wrote W, a seam picture of life in a coal—mining village.8 This play was followed by Hauptmann's most renowned naturalistic drama, The Weavers (1892). In the same year in England, G.B. Shaw's Widower's House, with its attack on "slum-landlordism, " appeared. Shaw also eochibited naturalistic “Rhodes, "France and Belgium," The History of Modern Drama, PP- 2h3‘h50 5Ibid., pp. 2A3-AA. 6Brockett, p. 277. 7Alrik Gustajson, "The Scandinavian Countries," The History of W: P- 23- 8Franz Rapp, "Germany," The History of Modern Drama, p. 79. rim mi techniq Raven‘s Prefessi Although 3c 2811, Kata-ans: the turn of the Les 5, ‘ie’s (ICC N 1 2&1 treated me Fear: the lith the Mac 139 in the Hes messed in 5.3: Tke Thm “ .y “A. ‘ .- w .1 4'2 in! Enter“ 3:?” 83 views and techniques in his treatment of prostitution in flag; Wgrsn's Profession- (1898).9 Although somewhat lessened in importance as a stylistic move- ment, Naturalism continued into the twentieth century. Shortly after the turn of the century, the French playwright, Eugene Brieux wrote Les Avarie’s (1902), "a study of venereal disease which, as Damaged M. created a sensation in England and America."10 within the same year, the Moscow Art Theatre scored one of its greatest triumphs with the production of Maxim Gorky's now famous naturalistic drama of life in the Moscow underworld, The Lower Dgpths.ll Naturalism also appeared in such plays as Elmer Rice's Street Scene, Eugene O'Neill's The Iceman Cometh and Long Day's Journey into Night, John Osborne's The Ent_e_1_*t_a_iner, and Tennessee Williams' Cat on a Hot Tin 1200;.12 Principles of Naturalism There is divided critical opinion as to whether Naturalism can be considered as a distinct dramatic style apart from Realism. It is true that certain similarities are apparent in the principles of both styles. Naturalism and Realism are very similar in that they are based on objectivity in observation and presentation... They are somewhat similar in their concern with the factors of heredity and environment, although Naturalism tends toward extremes in its in- sistence on these factors in determining human action and character. 9Hatlen, p. 159. 10"Brieux," 0 Co on to the Th t e, p. 96. 11"Gorky," Mord Comion to the Theatre, p. 329. 12Rowe, pp. 186-187. views and techniques 1: Harm‘s meessic-n (1 lilting?) somewhat :ent, Katu'alism cont in the tum of the century r . 'I ~ .es same: (1902), "a Lon, created a sense: we year, the Moscow A rlth the producticm of life in the Hoscw Lmde appear“ in such plays W and 1 Miami» 83 views and techniques in his treatment of prostitution in Mr_§_._ Wargen's Profession. (1898).9 Although somewhat lessened in importance as a stylistic move- ment, Naturalism continued into the twentieth century. Shortly after the turn of the century, the French playwright, Eugene Brieux wrote Les Avarie’s (1902), "a study of venereal disease which, as Damaged _G_o_qg_§_, created a sensation in England and America."10 Within the same year, the Moscow Art Theatre scored one of its greatest triumphs with the production of Maxim Gorky's now famous naturalistic drama of life in the Moscow underworld, The Lower Depths.ll Naturalism also appeared in such plays as Elmer Rice’s Street Scene, Eugene O'Neill's The Iceman Cometh and Long Dgy's Journey into Night, John Osborne's The Entgtginer, and Tennessee Williams' Cat on a Hot Tin Roof.12 Principles of Naturalism There is divided critical Opinion as to whether Naturalism can be considered as a distinct dramatic style apart from Realism. It is true that certain similarities are apparent in the principles of both styles. Naturalism and Realism are very similar in that they are based on objectivity in observation and presentation" They are somewhat similar in their concern with the factors of heredity and environment, although Naturalism tends toward extremes in its in- sistence on these factors in determining human action and character. 9H8tlm’ p O 159 . 10"Brieux," QBSIOEd COELion to the Theatre, p. 96. 11"Gorky," Mord Comion to the Theatre, p. 329- 12Rowe, pp. 186-187. has and techniques in Karen’s Profession (1 mm somewhat 2st, tiat'i‘alism contin thetum or the cent‘ ,. Les Amie/s (1902) ”a a 9 fl, created a senset me year, the Moscow 'w ,. . r... we production of 83 views and techniques in his treatment of prostitution in 1433; Warren's Progession- (1898) .9 Although somewhat lessened in importance as a stylistic move- mmt, Naturalism continued into the twentieth century. Shortly after the turn of the century, the French playwright, Eugene Brieux wrote Les hvarie’s (1902), "a study of venereal disease which, as Damaged 9203;, created a sensation in England and America."10 Within the same year, the Moscow Art Theatre scored one of its greatest triumphs with the production of Maxim Gorky's now famous naturalistic drama of life in the Moscow underworld, The Lower Dgpths.ll Naturalism also appeared in such plays as Elmer Rice's §_§_r_e_et Scene, Eugene O'Neill's The Iceman Cometh and Long Dhy's Journgy into Night, John Osborne's The Entertainer, and Tennessee Williams' Cat on a Hot Tin hang.12 Principles 0; Naturalism There is divided critical opinion as to whether Naturalism can be considered as a distinct dramatic style apart from Realism. It is true that certain similarities are apparent in the principles of both styles. Naturalism and Realism are very similar in that they are based on objectivity in observation and presentation” They are somewhat similar in their concern with the factors of heredity and mvironment , although Naturalism tends toward extremes in its in- sistence on these factors in determining human action and character. 9118121611, p. 1590 imprim," Olgord Gown to the Theatre, p. 96- 11"Gorlq," Mord Cogpghion to the Theatre, p. 329- 12Rowe, pp. 186-187. Katie there is little 1 difference between Nat: degree of selectivity 1 deterministic philoscp? diffs-emcee meat the to Eat "Pareto iron Re “mush Naturali in“ and 5m” inte hail! basfid upon m Reaganlh 3 pl": Acccr verse is aided “tire; Wifirse, and hmce film “W“ and ““ditioned he; by ted doctrines of pc Brita 31.10],le Strett _ e "' at " m hm being in 933th 1a“ ”the 3m fibrk Out . than“ 0: t 84 While there is little in the above principles that reveals a marked difference between Naturalism and Realism, the styles do differ in the degree of selectivity employed in depicting the actual world and in the deterministic philosophy which is the basis of Naturalism. Such differmces warrant the consideration of Naturalism as a style related to but separate from Realism. Although Naturalism and Realism share a common historical back- ground and similar intellectual influences}3 Naturalism is rather rigidly based upon a philosophy of determinism which "sets it apart from Realism."u' According to this philosophy, "every fact in the uni- verse is guided entirely by law" and "all the facts in the physical universe, and hmce also in human history, are absolutely dependent upon and conditioned by their causes."15 These doctrines, along with related doctrines of positivism, led to a naturalist theory that "drama should systenatically portray the true processes of the indi- vidual human being in relation with his envirormment, wherein cause-to- effect laws work out inexorably, quite aside from conventional morality 6 or the sentiments of the spectator."1 In Naturalism “nSee Chapter IV,, "Realism," p. 61.. ‘U'Vernon L. Parrington, The Be inn' 3 0 Critical Realism in America (New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World, Inc. , 1958), p. 321... 15James K. Feibleman, "Determinism," The Dictiopm of Philosophy, ed. Dagobert D. Runes (New York: Philosophical Library, 1910-2 , p. 780 16Paul L. Soper, "Backgrounds of Naturalism, " W 01 Speech, XXXIII, No. 1 (February, 191.7), 52. “the individual wa victil of the inex: neat, for aim was 1 to natural pmcesse The detemihi mm: of heredity ”Walk! and Heel. “tributes gm his I 3‘11“. but Naturu Q behavior is d at e Im‘nm (Italics mi mam” "Ian as . the chain of that a“, ph 61103; 3] ° ° ' behm Ed mullet; ”3P9 I 85 ”the individual was to be exhibited as the product, puppet, and victim of the inexorable forces of heredity, instinct, and environ- ment, for man was to be regarded as a wholly natural object subject to natural processes."17 The detsrninistic view of the relation between man and the factors of heredity and environment marks a difference between Naturalism and Realism, a difference in degree. Man's inherited attributes and his surroundings are a part of the principles of Realism, but Naturalism places a "greater emphasis on the ideal that 3;; behavior is determined by the forces of heredity and environ- melt."18 (Italics mine.) In dealing with these forces, Naturalism accentuates "man as an animal, a creature material, a. more link in the chain of phenomena."19 Naturalistic playwrights tend to imply that "men . . . behave as they must; that is, their hereditary traits and instincts shape and determine their character and Requeltly over- power their reason or moral scruples."20 In the principles of Naturalism, as in those of Realism there is an insistence on objectivity in observation and presentation. Zola had called for direct observation, exact anatomy, and the de- piction of "what is" in works of literature.21 The dramatist was to 17man”, 20m “M E03 0 s e s ’ p. 670 lemockett, p. 275. 19Frank w. Chandler, meets o; Modpgh org (New York: The Miller: Co., 1929). p. 35. 2C)Gessner, Trgm o: phe ghost”; Ibsen E Minor, p. 3. “mail. Zola, "Naturalism on the Stage," trans. Sammiel Draper, Pla ts P , ed. Toby Cole (New York: Hill and Wang, llgps s be com “Jedi“ his own "ideas or cu I a: waiting 503' the stage. W55 described wither. neat to deterrzifl according to the their awn disses until the plaénrr amaze: of man, ‘ ductlcn more or; dared to risk on It should be noted t? an ideal. In practi: tmly objective, due ‘0 a concern for that Unl‘. n - Jie Jails: v . .Ia:' ‘7‘. J“was-a3! is mre ex “#3:". eSpeciau », - e~ 86 be coldly objective in observing and recording; he was never to allow his own "ideas or outlook to intrude."22 Zola wrote, I am waiting for someone to put a man of flesh and bones on the stage, taken from reality, scientifically analyzed, and described without one lie . . . . I am waiting for environ- ment to determine the characters and the characters to act according to the logic of facts combined with the logic of their own diSpositions. . . . I am waiting, finally . . . until the playwrights return to the study of nature, to the anatonw of man, to the painting of life in an exact repro- duction more original and poggrful than anyone has so far dared to risk on the boards. It should be noted that the objectivity of Naturalism is a theory, an ideal. In practice, many naturalistic playwrights failed to be truly objective, due either to their social or personal prejudices or to a concern for dramatic form. . Unlike Realism which anploys selectivity to suggest reality, Naturalism is more exact and accurate in its imitation of observed reality, sepecially in the details of environment. Zola wrote that the dramatist must make use of environment as novelists do. . . . a novelist no longer looks on man as an intellectual abstraction . . . 3 he is a thinking animal, who forms part of nature, and who is subject to the multiple influences of the soil in which he grows and where he lives. That is why a climate, a country, a horizon, are often decisively important. The novelist no longer separates his character from the air he breathes; . . . ; he simply makes a note of the material conditions in which he finds his characters at every hour, and in which the facts are produced, in order to be absolutely thorough, and so that his inquiry may belong to the world's comprehensive view and reproduce reality in its entirety.24 Zola acknowledged that it was not only possible to "produce the reality of environment on the stage," but that it was a necessity 22’Brockett, p. 275. 232cm, "Naturalism on the Stage," p. 6. 24mm, pp. 10-11. ”imposed on the the is a result of Zola ”the stage setting ‘ in any previous mov We inc concern 1‘. + :1: , . . “a“ 15" 0f it is c the "slice of life.‘ to r ., .. aatcallsm and a. lealisa. w. . due "SlicG Cf tion to ~ the theatric areSSfi this idea 87 "imposed on the theatre as an essential condition of its existence."25 As a result of Zola's views and the practice of other playwrights, "the stage setting was given greater importance under naturalism than in any previous movement."26 The concern for environment and the "minute and cumulative de- tailing" of it is directly related to the naturalistic principle of the "slice 01' life."27 This principle is widely recognized as peculiar to Naturalism and aids in distinguishing the naturalistic style from Realism. The "slice of life" concept deve10ped as a part of the Opposi- tion to the theatrical conventions of the "well-made" play. Zola expressed this idea as a delving "into the living drama of the two- fold life of the character and its environment, bereft of every nursery tale, historical trapping, and the usual conventional stupidi- ties."28 He felt that for the dramatist "there should no longer be any school, no more formulas, no standards of any sort; there is only life itself . . . ."29 The dramatists who followed the views of Zola wrote plays which negated "theatricality and skillful dramatury" and attempted "to give the impression that what happened On stage was actuality unorganized, without a beginning, a middle, or an end."30 The aim was to transfer ZSIbge, p. 110 ZéBI'Oertt, p0 2760 273.01“, p. 1860 I I \ 28Emile Zola, "Preface to Therese Raquin," Empean Theories o: the Drama, ed. Barrett H. Clark (2nd rem; New York: Crown Publishers, Inc., 191.7), p. 1.01. 29mm. BOHatlen, p. 160. a sweat of life a: toning it by artis1 smetural elenents £121, 831 dEIC‘JGTJ a true picture of L '33 to begin appear. sally Arbitrary.)- 88 a segment of life as accurately as possible to the stage without dis- torting it by artistic selection and arrangement. The customary structural elements of dramaturgy such as complication, discovery, climax, and denouement were regarded as hami‘ul to the presentation of a true picture of life. In Naturalism, the point at which the story was to begin appeared to be selected at random and its and seemed equally arbitrary.31 Characteristics 0; Naturalism General Characteristics The dramas produced under the influence of naturalistic theory exhibit five comonly shared general characteristics. They are: l) portrayal of life in the lower strata of society, 2) frankness in the presentation of sordid or unpleasant aspects of life, 3) an aura of pessimism, I.) an emphasis on the elanent of character, and 5) a "slice of life" manner in dramaturg. Naturalism commonly draws its content from the lower classes in society. There is little basis for this selection in the principles of Naturalism, yet in practice there is "a marked tendency toward se- lection of the lower levels of society and lower human types as subject matter."32 Naturalism seeks to depict reality, but the reality it depicts is "primarily that of the lower middle and working classes."33 In turning "the drama to scales of humble and low life, " Naturalism utilizes "scales and characters from city tenements and the underworld, from industrial environment, from peasant life and folk life, from Ble‘OCkett, p0 2760 32R0we, p. 1870 33Rh0d88, p. 2450 mama and business gealisu but they are Naturalism exhi and depressing events m not necessarily i istic drama is 0ft!!- quent‘q epics-seized}: license abound in Kat ”sausaticnalistic ex; Seder, the misery c ti“ Pxple, or else . '77“ naturalist b ‘ rear: with only the ugh l" Hatmimfs de' 89 3“ Such characters can also be found in commerce and business." Realism but they are much more predominant in Naturalism. Naturalism exhibits a frankness in presenting sordid, unpleasant, and depressing events in its drama. Again this is evident in practice and not necessarily in theory. The life that is depicted in natural- 35 istic drama is often ugly and crude. Man's animfl nature is fre— quently emphasized.36 Scenes of degradation, disease, and sexual license abound in Naturalism.37 The naturalist often resorts to "sensationalistic eXperienceg" he is likely "to dwell upon crime, vice, squalor, the misery of the fourth estate, primitive instincts in primi- tive people, or else morbid passions in people of the higher class."38 "The naturalist breaks sharply from the realist in his preoccupation with only the ugly and squalid aspects of character and action."39 Naturalism's deterministic view of human character and action and its presentation of unpleasant details of life in the lower strata of society cause much of naturalistic drama to appear pessimistic in tone and quality. Pessimism, in a general sense, is concerned with gloominess, deepondency, magnification of sorrow and evil, and contempt for the world as it is. Such concern has led pessimists to suggest compensations or to offer relnedies.l’o In the drama of Naturalism, a 34Hermer, Seldon, and Sellman, p. 75. 35Marriott, p. 72. 36Hefi‘ner, Seldon, and Sellman, p. 71.. 3768381101., Form and Idea 0 e e e , pe 680 39 380M”, p. 330 Hatlm, p. 1580 “oxm F. Leidecker, "Pessimism," The Dictio o Philoso , ed. Dagobert D. Runes (New York: PhiIOSOphical Library, 191.25, p. 2300 salm- pattern of th: Naturalism dis; pessmim apparent in Sazu-alistic dramatis of life in order to s [:aturalisfl dis: the feelings to a mist. specifica in our social 3::- it, to the and th ins 0: a new 331—4 . a of nature . M Accordingly, Natural: iii“ in that "the: than “M “1° 800d fc: Lu“ Realm. r. 90 similar pattern of thought is apparent. Naturalism diaplays "a bias toward pessimism.“ However, the pessimism apparent in naturalistic drama is not without purpose. Naturalistic dramatists frequently portray the dark and gloom side of life in order to Spur society toward reform of conditions. [Naturalisfl disdains nothing, however ugly, that can stir the feelings to an appreciation of human conditions as they exist. Specifically, naturalism recognizes the unnatural in our social structure and does not hesitate to anphasize it, to the end that dissatisfaction may incite to the build- ing of a new structure more closely in accord with the laws of nature. Accordingly, Naturalism often uses its pessimistic view to attain positive ends and in this manner is allied with some aspects of Realism. Yet the dramatists of Naturalism differ from those of Realism in that "their insistence is upon the evil which exists rather than upon the good for which they long."l‘3 Like Realism, Naturalism anphasizes the element of character.M The "slice of life" principle with its aversion to customary drama- turgical practices in plotting makes character more important. The primacy of character can be seen in Zola's comments on his play, Therese Quin. He wrote that the action of the drama consisted of the "inner struggles of the characters" and depended upon a "logic of sensation and sentiment."1‘5 Gorky, in his preface to M39, indicated a similar view when he stated that characters "must be “Parrington, p. 32).. uChandler, p. 31.. BM. umickinson, pp. 126-27. “Zola, "Preface to The/rese Raquin," p. 1.01. drive; by their CWT) sodas — tragic or : pemitted to act in interests, and pass: In Naturalism play appear to be a c: the principles of l: "plotless plays" waged and often :1 Kain-313m differs 1‘ the actual wrld , 5‘3. amine:- Ere ‘L‘I Fee In Production, ‘3» n we - 1 fC‘lX'thumln CC' v. ‘ uux 7.7 that, the c P‘E“m . EN 18m 8 ‘ 92K 3 to 1 3" a“die L “aha t “C8 to belie real life}9 91 driven by their own inner impulses, create the incidents and epi- sodes - tragic or comic -- and direct the course of the play, being jpermitted to act in harmony with their own contradictory natures, interests, and passions."46 In.Naturalism.it is characteristic to have the action of the play appear to be a "slice of life." This is a logical consequence of the principles of’Naturalism. Naturalists incline toward seeming- ly "plotless plays" which appear to be "reproductions of the un- arranged and often uneventful course of dailyexistence."47 In this, JNaturalism.differs from.Realism.which, while projecting an illusion of the actual world, selects and arranges the events of ordinary life in a.manner more in keeping with established traditions of dramatic form. In production, Naturalism.is similar to Realism in following the "fourthdwall" convention but "adheres strictly to the peep-show theory that the characters observed on the stage are non-theatrical."48 Naturalism seeks to reduce theatrical convention to a.minimum.and lead the audience to believe that what they see on stage is a segment of real life.49 Form.Elements Plot The element of plot in.Naturalism is similar in many ways to that of’Realis:m..5O It takes its content almost exclusively from.the héhatlen, p. 161. h7Gassner, The Theatre in Our Time, p. 78. “geesener, Producin the Pla , p. 62. throckett, p. 276. 503” Chapter Iv, "Realism," pp. 73.. '. f1 contezporary some; i‘. tions as the aside, t‘: of attack and the use Eatiraliszn. Structure that it “tenis to rat: in TeSPeCt for the un: Although the p l *_l in many rqs, there a; in dist" "ds'n ' e a. "‘~ we ‘5 nuts I, structure and 2) sub‘ 0: hm‘l life. $‘R cra‘acteristics of Na some clarification. 92 contemporary scene; it eliminates such obvious theatrical conven- 51 tions as the aside, the monologue, and set Speeches. The late point of attack and the use of retrospective eiqiosition are also used in Naturalism. Structural compactness is observable in Naturalism in that it "tends to return to the economics of classical construction in respect for the unities."52 Although the plot element in Naturalism and Realism is similar in many ways, there are two factors of plot in Naturalism which aid in distinguishing it from Realism. They are l) a "slice of life" structure and 2) subject matter which treats the less edifying aSpects of human life. Both factors have been mentioned under the general characteristics of Naturalism, but their relation to plot requires. some clarification. Naturalism insists that the "slice of life" should be "the 53 formal principle of drama." It "seeks to diapense with the technical expedients both of romanticism and of the well-made play: soliloquies, "54 asides, confidante, raisonneurs. As a result, traditional tech- niques of dramaturgy are minimized to the point that it is sometimes 55 The "slice of life" 6 principle "favors an arrangement of facts after the pattern of life."5 impossible to be aware of them as technique. Although Zola wanted playwrights to paint life in "exact repro- duction,"57 the fact that drama is an art form requiring selection, 51Chandler, p. 33. szDickinson, p. 126. ”Rowe, p. 186. SADickinson, p. 1.26. ‘ 55Millett and Bentley, p. 11.8. 56Dickinson, p. 126. 57Zola, "Naturalism on the Stage, " p. 6. scheme. rat? 39‘“; tions as the aside, ‘ of attack and the us« that it "tens to re‘. in reSpect for the '1' Although the p2 11‘. my was, there a '= ‘. §:n—~\. ‘ ' ' 15 deseugnsmng 1‘. Structure and 2) subj °r mm life- Both characteristics of Na some clarification. I“"‘t'il‘alism ins: fen. . . nil prlnClple 01‘ Q 92 contanporary scene; it eliminates such obvious theatrical conven— 51 tions as the aside, the monologue, and set speeches. The late point of attack and the use of retrOSpective exposition are also used in Naturalism. Structural compactness is observable in Naturalism in that it "tends to return to the economics of classical construction in respect for the unities."52 Although the plot element in Naturalism and Realism is similar in many ways, there are two factors of plot in Naturalism which aid in distinguishing it from Realism. They are l) a "slice of life" structure and 2) subject matter which treats the less edifying aSpects of human life. Both factors have been mentioned under the general characteristics of Naturalism, but their relation to plot requires, some clarification. Naturalism insists that the "slice of life" should be "the mmflpfimmhofummJBIt%%btofiwwmwfihwemmMml expedients both of romanticism and of the well-made play: soliloquies, asides, confidante, raisonneurs."54 As a result, traditional tech- niques of dramaturgy are minimized to the point that it is sometimes 55 impossible to be aware of them as technique. The "slice of life" 6 principle "favors an arrangenent of facts after the pattern of life."5 Although Zola wanted playwrights to paint life in "exact repro- ducti.on,"57 the fact that drama is an art form requiring selection, 51Chand1er, p. 33. 52Dickinson, p. 126. 53Rowe, p. 186. 5ADickinson, p. 126. - 55M111ett and Bentley, p. 1h8. SéDickinson, p. 126. 57Zola, "Naturalism on the Stage, " p. 6. arrangflfient, 3: £111.58 Nature had to develop Naturalis to make their (i. replaced cozplit literary and ma: Meade. e.e., $537 @Tasizaj mafiazard ccnve. that of life."6 5' 52:“: e 93 arranganent, and heightening made such a demand impossible to ful- £111.58 Naturalism, in denying the existing techniques of plotting, had to develOp some techniques and conventions of its own. Naturalists, in keeping with the "slice of life" theory, attempted to make their dramas appear plotless, without apparent form. They replaced complicated plots with simple ones.59 They discarded "the literary and narrative qualities of the production, style, symmetrical dialogue, etc., in favor of the observed surface qualities of life."60 They emphasized minute details of environment.61 They presented ”haphazard conversations -- a dialogue terse, broken, rambling, as that of life."62 "Potentially dramatic scenes were underplayed, suggested or even avoided altogether."63 In short, the naturalists could not escape the need for structure in plays so they were careful to disguise the mechanism of plotting in order to make their dramas appear to be a "slice of life" from the actual world. Sprdid, depressing, unsavory subject matter is commonly found in Naturalism as an element of plot. This trait is so marked as to be a general characteristic of the style. It was noted in the early history of the style in the productions of the Theatre-Libre which were labeled 58Brockett, p. 276. 59Rhodes, p. 2%. "Singile" is used in the sense that the over- all story is easily summarized. In the attempt to imitate the often rambling actions of everyday life, the naturalist may present a rather complicated ordering of events. 61 60Dickinson, pp. 126-127. Rowe, p. 186. 6QChandler, p. 33. 63Hatlen, p. 160. ‘~L'1'v' msse, a term 101.515, the! as "'a sort c1“ peonle who never had . injustice, like a fig portrays: the sea; “51303 - far tc of what they saw dramatists usual; Sordidness, stupi forces in the my Naturalistic ;; 1333 fifty-me in thfiir ”L. "Mac \ter Some aspects 0; 9h rosse, a term roughly translated as "crass," but more accurately de- fined as "'a sort of vicious ingenuousness, the state of soul of peOple who never had any moral sense and who live in impurity and injustice, like a fish in water.'"6l" Antoine and his playwrights portrayed the seam side of existence in exaggerated fashion -- far too often with a mere cynical acceptance of what they saw or thought they saw. . . .:Antoine's dramatists usually began with the premise that sordidness, stupidity and hypocrisy are the dominant forces in the world. 5 Naturalistic plays after the time of the Theatre—Libra were less extreme in their treatmmt of the sordid and unpleasant, but they continued to depict "life in its crudeness and ugliness, its formlessness and colorlessness."66 The details of naturalistic plays were unsavory as the author's intentions and the law allowed.67 Character Some aSpects of character have already been discussed under the general characteristics of Naturalism: portrayal of human beings from the lower levels of society, the primacy of character over other elements, and the influence of character on plot. Consequently, there is little need to discuss them further here. Yet naturalistic charac- ters can be identified by some additional attributes. They are l) complei: in nature, 2) heavily influenced by environment, 3) tend to passive victims of forces within and around them, and 1.) members of lower society. Occasionally, a social group may be treated as a 6l‘Gorelik, p. 133. Gorelik is quoting the French critic F1101}. “This... pp- Bit-135. “Marriott, p. 72. 67Gassner, Producin the Pl , pp. 62-63. ”collective" prota, The persons c cosplex in their p2 dJ-aaatist attempts “mire Of plot, I an unobtrusive revealing the: Mti‘t'aiions fr‘ Pmtagenist dc, @031 i“ n CCRSI iqutra ' ‘ . .“ U‘Caas ’ 95 "collective" protagonist. The persons depicted in the drama of Naturalism aregenerally complex in their physical and psychological make-up. The naturalistic dramatist attempts to create plausible individuals.68 As in his handling of plot, he employs an unobtrusive technique in the delineation of characters, revealing them cumulatively bit by bit and showing complex motivations frequently at odds with one another. The protagonist does not move in a straight line toward his goal from conscious intent but is bedeviled by doubts, 69 frustrations, torn by inner conflicts, ridden by passions. Strindberg described the persons in his play, Miss Julie, as "charac- terless" since character to him signified "a man fixed and finished."70 He wrote, "I do not believe, therefore, in simple stage characters; and the summary judgments of authors -- this man is stupid, that one brutal, this Jealous, that sting, and so forth - should be challaiged by the Naturalists who know the richness of the soul com- plex and realize that vice has a reverse side very much like virtue."7l He indicated the complexity of the characters in M_i_s_s_ £11_i_e_ whal he stated that they were "conglomerations of past and present stages of civilization, bits from books and papers, scraps of humanity, rags and tatters of fine clothing, patched together as is the human soul."72 In Naturalism, character deve10pment is almost completely de- pendent upon environment. Zola, in an essay on the novel, wrote, 69 68Rhodes, p. 21.4. Hatlen, p. 160. 70August Strindberg, "Preface to Miss Julie," Six Plays of Strindber , trans. Elizabeth Sprigg (New York: Doubleday and Co., 1955 r P0 61»- nIbido 72%., p0 650 "de consider that he is completed by and heme we shall About looking fc . 7 . 1383-"3 The me. should make sounds seat of Characters m. a' .18 mt'lralj of character in 5‘ e' , ’ cml’lfi‘ ice,7~* w: Which ‘e .. the: “:1.th O? : L‘" ~ . ‘13 m Spite of a Has the chil‘acter o peI‘SOn Of "8‘ ‘0 H. r this: e ' halt, at t} 96 "We consider that man cannot be separated from his surroundings, that he is completed by his clothes, his house, his city, and his country, and hence we shall not note a single phenomenon of his brain or heart without looking for the causes of the consequences in his surround- ings."7-3 The previous discussion under the principles of Naturalism should make abundantly clear the role of environment in the develOp- ment of characters in Naturalism. The naturalistic emphasis on environment affected the element of character in several ways. Individuals were regarded as victims of circumstancefll’ "helpless and futile victims of impulses and powers which they cannot control."75 'The desire to demonstrate the effects of environment led naturalists to select characters of three types, this in spite of a theoretical objection to character types. One type was the character of "marked physique and small intellectual activity," 76 "Characters of excited, neurotic a person of "strong animal drives." temperament, at the mercy of moods, driven by forces that they do not stop to analyze" comprised a second type.77 Sometimes the behavior of this character type was "aggravated by a physical defect."78 A third type, "a strong character whose will was broken," appeared occasion- ally.79 In order for the naturalist to show the "debilitating effects of unfavorable environment" he chose "characters who were twisted, 73E/hnile Zola, "The Novel," The Eigerimental Novel and Other Ess , trans. Belle M. Sherman (New York: The Cassell Publishing Co., 1893 g p. 2320 'W'Hatlen, p. 160. 75Millett and Bentley, p. 11.9. 76Parrington, p. 324. 77Ibid., pp. 324-25. 78Ibid., p. 325. 79Ibid. lever J to den: mtura] any 161 19""815 and rat sate ti: 97 ‘wayward, and grotesque."80 Finally, the preoccupation with environ— ment often caused man to' be depicted in his animal nature.81 In Naturalism, the characteristic selection of humans from.the lower levels of society is in part a result of the naturalist's desire to demonstrate environmental cause and effect. It is feasible that naturalists could show the influence of heredity and environment on any level of society, but the characterization of members of higher levels would necessitate including qualities of education, culture, and rationality. These qualities would then tend to obscure or compli- cats the expression of environmental cause and effect. It appears simpler to choose members of a level of society closer to nature to clearly indicate the effects of heredity and environment. Some naturalistic plays have a "collective rather than an in- dividual hero."82 In such plays, "no matter how vividly the indi- viduals of the group may be distinguished from one another, they are most important to the meaning of these plays as members of the group."83 Individual characters tend to lose stature when a group is viewed as 84 'The "collective" or group protagonist, while often the protagonist. associated with Naturalism, is more of a curiosity, however, than a general trait of character in naturalistic playwriting. Language "What I want to hear on the stage," said Zola, "is the language as it is spoken every day."85 Basically, naturalistic dialogue 80Hatlen, p. 160. 81Heffner, Seldon, and.Sellman, p. 7h. 82(33831'161', Form and Idea 0 e e e , p. 350 SBIbide, p. 360 ample. 85Zola, "Naturalism on the Stage," p. 12. nhibits a I ah would : that of Si; 0 o I 1 its re; the mcv kept . sets to: Angus" cam degafi. ' ° ° Clare: ail: a, 5;; 98 exhibits a more phonographic technique than the realistic technique. Zola would rather see more "elasticity, and greater naturalness" than that of simple Realism.86 By that he meant that . . . if we cannot produce on the stage a conversation with its repetitions, its length, and its useless words, at least the movement and the tone of the conversation could be kept . . . . the best style on the stage is that which best sets forth the spoken conversation . . . .87 August Strindberg, again in his preface to Miss Julie, advo- cated departing from traditional "well-made" dialogue "by not making . . . characters catechists who ask stupid questions in order to elicit a smart reply."88 In addition his comment mirrors Zola's by asking for "real-life" talk in plays. I have avoided the symmetrical, mathematical construction of French dialogue, and let people's minds work irregularly, as they do in real life where, during a conversation, no topic is drained to the dregs, and one's mind finds in another a chance cog to engage in. So, too, the dialogue wanders, gathering in the opening scenes material which is later picked up, worked over, repeated, expognded and developed like the theme in a musical composition. 9 Naturalistic dramatists seem to have adopted the suggestions and examples of Zola and Strindberg, because a formal principle of Naturalism is "the renouncement of any poetic anbellishment and the minute reproduction of everyday Speech, down to its slightest inflec- tion.”0 The dialogue of Naturalism reads like a "seemingly literal rendering of ordinary speech, with its circumlocutions, pauses, 8631.4: 871%. 88Strindberg, "Preface to Miss Julie," p. 68. 89_I_b_i£l_., p. 69. 90H. F. Garten, Modern German Drama (New York: Grove Press, 1962). p. 29. g [a] uncozp‘. assets and in: There are saunter are d 355 2) oar. is a Beth theses are is or Hath-a; Ilatralis and ms Sum-g: bars which he ,3 in Mill-align; 99 [and] uncompleted thoughts."9l It frequently includes "slang, local accents and idioms, jargon, folk Speech and dialects.92 Theme There are two dominant themes in Naturalism: 1) human action and character are determined and controlled by environment and heredity, and 2) man is a victim of other men, his society, and his own instincts. Both themes are closely related and both stan directly from the princi- ples of Naturalism. Naturalistic dramas suggest that man is a product of his birth and his surroundings. Further, he is subject to determiniStic, natural laws which he cannot control. As a result, a frequent idea projected in naturalistic dramas is that man is an animal, "a product of a callous nature."93 A strict adherence to the demonstration of the effect of heredity and environment on personality results in a view of man as an impotent victim of uncontrolled forces. The naturalist chooses to portray man 94 as "the individual defeated by the world." This theme has two forms: "1) Life is a trap, 2) Life is mean."95 Such themes may be related to environment or "imperious desires - but the outcome is usually hOpe- less sorrow - sometimes stolid resignation, sometimes fierce protest, but with no other and than annihilation."96 The naturalist, like k 91Heffner, Seldon, and Sellman, pp. 75-76. 92%. 93Hatlen, p. 158. 9l‘Parrington, p. 321+. ”an. 962.12. 100 playwrights in many periods throughout the history of drama, sees man as a victim of fate. But the Fate of the naturalists is no arbitrary destiny; it is rather the inevitable reaction upon the individual of his race, his heredity, his environment. These influences are so powerful that he lacks the will to struggle against them. His will, indeed, is but a. resultant of such forces . . . . . If he acts, it is but to obey some impulsion of lust, avarice, hatred. Vice and crime are the themes of the naturalist, morbid longgngs, distraught minds, sordid evils of the social systen. The themes projected in Naturalism have caused the style to be labeled as pessimistic. While it is true that crime, vice, animal instincts, sexual passion, and other sordid subjects appear in Naturalism, some critics have attempted to defend its pessimistic view. In a historical context, Naturalism is seen as a "reSponse to the social democratic movement of the times."98 In order to change conditions in society, the naturalists took a first step by focussing "attention on the rottenness of society."99 They argued that life "must be faced in its grimmest and most horrible aSpects; only so can it ever be improved."100 5w: Criteria for Identg' ication of the Dramatic Style of Naturalism Principles of Naturalism Naturalism is based on a philOSOphy of scientific determinism which views the world as subject to natural laws that dictate all 97Frank Chandler, The Contanmrg Drama of fiance (Boston: Little, Bram, and COO, 1921 , p. 520 98Chandler, Aspects of Modern Drama, p. 31,. 99Hatlen, p0 1620 looChandler, The Contmrm Drama of fiance, p. 52. cause and at. action and c1 mimnzmt. ml to be oh. the acted m details or 1: Served detail lOl cause and effect. Man in this context is regarded as an object whose action and character are subject to the natural laws of heredity and environment. The naturalist attempts to adOpt the methods of science and to be objective in the observing and presenting of'material from ‘the actual world. This objectivity leads him to a concern for the details of life. He insists that the presentation of carefully ob- served details must be presented as a "slice of life" itself. Characteristics of Naturalism General Characteristics In Naturalism, life in the lower levels of society is portrayed. The sordid, unpleasant, bestial aspects of life are frankly treated. .A general pessimistic attitude is evident. The element of character is paramount. A "slice of life" quality is particularly character- istic. Eorm.Elements Plot Content is taken from contemporary life. Theatrical and drama- turgical conventions are minimized. The main feature of naturalistic plots is the "slice of life" technique in which the dramatic action is presented as a close approximation of observed reality. Plots are simple, but filled with many details of ordinary life. Theatrical climaxes and "big scenes" are avoided or underplayed. The plot may appear to have no beginning and no end. Content is frequently depress- ing, sordid, and "crass." ‘O A“ A‘ 35.3%.}: “A“ Add as!" nq-vn'h .. pg. and seeks cf cl'arae‘. tar as entrees strong a; mitei, t 502:3: to 102 Character Naturalistic characters are often complex;mixtures of physical and psychological factors. The naturalist avoids types, theoretically, and seeks to present developing or dynamic individuals. Attributes of character stem from heredity and environment. Characters often appear as victims of their physical, psychological, and social cir- cumstances. They tend to be of three kinds: l)"physical" peeple of strong animal drives and little intellectual activity; 2) neurotic, excited, temperamental people who are driven by forces they do not bother to analyze and whose behavior is often complicated by some physical defect; and 3) People of strong character whose will has been broken. Occasionally, a collective or group protagonist appears in naturalistic drama. Language The dialogue of Naturalism is phonographic in technique. It contains repetitions, circumlocutions, and pauses, to achieve a speech like that of the actual world. Slang, jargon, idioms, dialects, and folk Speech are common. Theme Naturalism projects the theme that human character is determined by heredity and environment. Man is regarded as a victim of a world he cannot control. Iife is seen as mean or as a trap. Man seems doomed to defeat and annihilation. Themes have a strong suggestion of pessimism. CHAPTER VI SYMBOLISM Historical Background Just as the romantic movement of the early nineteenth century ‘was a reaction against the formal Classicism of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, and the realistic movement of the second half of the nineteenth century was a reaction against Romanticism, so too in the last decade of the nineteenth century the symbolists reacted against the theatre of Realism. As a variant form.of Romanticism,l Symbolism.began as a poetic movement, strongly influenced by the philosOphical idealism.of Bergson; the poetry of Baudelaire, Rimbaud, and.Verlaine; the painting style of the post-impressionists; and the music of Wagner.2 Symbolism arose first in the literature of France when the 1John Gassner points out that while the spirit of symbolist drama is certainly romantic, the two styles exhibit significant differences. "Th6 romantic drama is licit, whereas the symbolist drama is suggestive. The former has the clear outlines of a well- defined action, whereas the latter has an elusive, penumbral content. Romantic drama is insistent -- . . . -- even when mys- terious; symbolist drama is ambiguous - . . . -- even when its content is simple." As for the treatment of environment, "the * romanticist glamorizes the environment or uses it for effects of horror, but, unlike the symbolist, he does not abstract it into a symbol of the soul of the play or the state of mind of a character." (low and Idea 0 o o o , p. 128). 2Gassner, Treasggy of the Theatre: Ibsen to Miller, p. 259. 103 10h so-called "neo-Romantic" poets reacted against the "cold, formal poetry of Parnassians like Leconte de Lisle, and declared themselves 'symbolists'."3 Specifically, it was in 1886 that the French poet Jean More/as, in an article in Fi aro, proposed that the term "symbolism" be applied to a particular literary tendency which up to that time had been generally labeled "decadence."h In drama in the 1880's, the established realistic and natural- istic schools of playwrighting were challenged by the new group of symbolist writers. Led in Spirit by Maurice Maeterlinck, who wrote under the influence of the poets Mallarme’ and Verlaine, Symbolism be- came the "fashionable mode of expression in the 1890's."5 It was during, and immediately following, the 1890's that Maeterlinck wrote his most impressive symbolist dramas -- The Intruder (1890), Th_e_ _B_1_i_._n_d (1891), his most successful ml]. length play, Pellefas and Me’lisande (1893), The Interior (1895), and The Blue Bird (1908). Although Masterlinck was recognized as the leading dramatist of the Symbolist movement, other major playwrights were involved in the creation of symbolist drama. Ibsen's later plays such as The Master w (1892). W (1894), and W (1899). turned toward Symbolism.6 Even the German playwright, Gerhart Hauptmann, departed from the ranks of the realist-naturalist writers 3John Gassner, Masters 0 the Drama, (3d ed. 3 New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1951;), p. 1.12. “Paul Scholfield, "The Age of Symbolism," Livin A e, Vol. 350, N0. 4-433 (July, 1936): M0- 5638811615 Form and Idea 0 o o o , p. 980 6Gassner, Masters of the Drama, pp. 380-83. .d “K i. ‘ e 6‘ H \v. {1‘ 105 long enough to contribute his partially symbolic play, Hannele (1893), and his wholly symbolic play, The Sunken Bell (1896), to the drama of Symbolism.7 The immediate effects of the develOpment of Symbolism in drama were two-fold. In theatre it led to a series of innovations in stage production, particularly in stage settings.8 ‘In drama, it partially loosened the hold of Realism on dramatists and brought the poet back into the field of playwrighting.9 Maeterlinck, Hoflnannsthal, Claudel, Andreyev, Synge, Yeats, and even O'Neill at some time turned from the observation of ordinary life toward the freer use Of imagination in Symbolism. mg of §Imboli§m The principles which underlie Symbolism as a dramatic style are derived from two related sources, Maurice Maeterlinck's essays on drama and the symbolist movement in French poetry led by Stephane/ Mallarme’. Since Maeterlinck's concepts of drama were greatly influ- enced by the French poets whor established the basic tenets of Symbolism in literature, it is necessary to outline the general principles of Symbolism in poetry before attempting to treat the particular theories advanced by Maeterlinck. Such an approach is not meant to imply, 71bido, pp. A59'600 8As John Gassner states, "The best and lasting effect of symbol- ism, and not only on the nonrealistic but on the realistic theatre of all gradations, came from the efforts of scene designers and stage directors." (Treas_1_1_ry of the Theatre: Ibsen to Miller, p. 259). Although the scenic and stage practices of such figures as Appia, Craig, and Robert Edmund Jones are important, the discussion of them is beyond the scope of this study. 9&831181', Form and Idea 0 o o o , p. 98. 106 however, that one source is more important than the other. The general philOSOphy of the symbolists gained whatever importance it had in drama principally through the plays and essays of Maeterlinck. 0n the other hand, Maeterlinck's concepts of drama were not original with him, but were personal interpretations of basic symbolist theory. The symbolist movement in poetry embodied a search for truth, an ultimme, absolute truth. Mallarme/ and the other disciples of Symbol- ism denied that such truth could be found by observing the immediately 10 Such perceivable world or resorting to rational thought processes. methods were alien to their concept of the nature ofi‘reality. They held that "truth is to be graSped only by intuition."ll The symbolists' insistence on an intuitive knowledge of reality was based on their world-view. They believed that the observable world was not true reality, but a reflection of an ideal, invisible Absolute.12 According to Mallarmel's aesthetic theory, the world is divided into a material systan which is representative or symbolic of a Spiritual system that is ideological, permanent, abstract, and "inaccessible to the continual flux of matter.”13 To Mallarme’ and other symbolist writers, "external phenomena . . . [were] symbols of a higher system of ideas."ll" The "higher lOBrockett, p. 287. llIbid. lZCalvin S. Brown, et. al., The Reader's Co anion to World Literature (New York: New American Library, 19535, p. A32. 13Hayse Cooperman, The Aesthetics of Stephane’Mallarme’ (New York: The Koffern Press, 1933), p. 18. 1“May Daniels, The bench Theatre of the Unsggken (Edinburgh: University Press, 1953 , p. 23. systen of 1 reality, it less of viz of 111 ml “the 'sc-‘ll filer seam dmt."15 j finish, tc 1 "to Meal twee. visi‘: N Ctrg-ee. ”'15, ":1.“ am that In EXist beta! The 1 5mm th. $065.13 ”Shem be “13515.": \ 15. Ar 30;». "s‘xel‘r: 107 system of ideas" has been variously termed as spiritual, inner reality, universal, eternal, soul, essence, and absolute. Regard- less of what it had been called, to the symbolists it was the source of all true knowledge of man and the world. The symbolism wanted to eocpress the truth of spiritual things, "the 'soul' of that which can be apprehended only by the soul -- the finer sense of things unseen, the deeper meanings of things evi- dent."15 They could not depend on observation of the material world which, to them, was transient and imperfect. Instead, they sought "to reveal the mystery of inner life and the Spiritual harmony be- tween visible and invisible reality" through expression of "analogies and correSpgndanceS which the poet alone can graSp.":L6 In other words, "The symbolists insisted that things themselves have a soul and that we must endeavour to grasp the inner correSpondences which exist between ourselves and the world."17 The symbolists believed that the knowledge of the relationships between the eternal and transient worlds could only be expressed by symbols.18 They felt that the artist's intuition of the absolute "should be conveyed by suggestions rather than by description or analysis."19 As a. consequence, lSArthur Symons, Dramatis Personae (Indianapolis, Indiana: The Bobbs-Merrill Co. , 1923), p. 99. 16Block and Shedd, p. 157. 17Pierre de Bacourt and J. W. Cunliffe, Egench Literature Digging the Last Half-Century (New York: The Macmillan Co., 1927), p. 2560 18 Ibid . 19Deniels, p. 24. "all 108 Symbolism had the power of suggesting; it did not state any realities, subjective or objective . . . ; it was founded upon exaggerated memories, registered and expressed by the artist, who did not portray them, but implied than. 0 this wise, the symbols had a universal aspect, . . . . The symbolist writer was not as interested in communicating his thoughts directly to others as he was in giving them suggestions ‘which would "induce them to think and dream for themselves."21 As Mallarme’ said in his _E_3_n_gu$te sur l'e/volution l_._i_.£tteraire, To name an object means to suppress three parts of the enjoyment which consists in gradually guessing its meaning. To suggest it, that is its dreamlike function. The perfect unfolding of the mystery constitutes the symbol. In the Symbolist movement the reliance on suggestion (symbols) to communicate the truth of external reality was based to a great extent on Mallarme's ideas about poetic language. Wallace Fowlie explained the concepts in this manner: The theory of the suggestiveness of words comes from a belief that a primitive language, half-forgotten, half-living, exists in each man. It is a language possessing extraordinary affini- ties with music and dreams. Poetry, in the putting to use of this exceptional language, is the establishment of relation- ships between things in the world and the sensitivity of the poet. This is a form of esoterism, a way toward a spiritual knowing of the universe when tag symbol will be found to be ever real and ever suggestive. The belief that the artist can only suggest the nature of the absolute realm led the symbolists to anphasize the "importance of the sound of the verse and the need for fastidious craftsmanship in creating 20Cooperman, pp. 10-11. 21Bacourt and Cunliffe, p. 266. 22‘M. Joubert, "Mysticism in French Literature," Contmrm Review, Vol. 151, No. 1 (January, 1937), 98. 23Wallace Fowlie, Mallarme/ (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1953), p. 264. the ed ts msic was ‘. since it WE to reach t1 like those mbols as The use of the swim: it comm: matings t "151': mere; 39332233 c Che ; '33 the id "file notic is cut a a the ”Heep theSe th‘. m min View} the 109 the effects of music through words."21+ Mallarme/believed that "since music was the art that could express everything through suggestion, since it was the beyond of words and visions, it was the aim of poetry to reach the realm of music."25 In their attempts to produce "effects like those of music," the symbolists tended to view their use of symbols as having "an abstract value like musical notes and chords."26 The use of symbols rather than direct description supposedly enabled the symbolists to achieve the indefiniteness of music which, because it communicates no direct idea, has the power to suggest different meanings to different listeners. This is in keeping with Mallarme”s wish merely to suggest or allude and leave the reader to create the meanings of the suggestions or allusions for himself.27 One principle of Symbolism that had a direct bearing on drama was the idea that the theatre should be a unification of all the arts. "The notion that external reality in its multitudinous and varied forms is but a manifestation of interrelated primordial ideas . . . fled-7 to the conception of a fusion of all arts, themselves different aSpects of these higher ideas."28 This principle, although expressed by Mallarmec was originally advanced by the German composer, Richard Wagner, who viewed the "drama as a grandiose celebration of mythic and ritualistic values."29 He "dreamed that poetry and music, . . . , would be united 2“Calvin S. Brown, p. 1.32. 25Cooperman, p. 103. 2W Wilson, _A_x__el's Castle (New York: Charles Scribner's SOUS, 1935), p. 21. 27Cooperman, p. 15. 28Daniels, p. 23. 29Block and Shedd, p. 6. 110 in the art of the future, the drama."30 The drama was to be created by the Spontaneous blending of the art-forces. The task of the dramas was to depict real actions, render them intelligible to the general public by a supreme emotional motivation; this emotional understanding couldBEest be attained through a perfected union of the arts. Wagner's relation to Symbolist thought was clearly evident in that he believed the drama was to reveal the outer aspect of an inner meaning, persuade the witness to concentrate and follow by the creation of a suited and impressive atmosphere, inspire him with great religious (social religious) faith. The feeling of awe, aroused by the lofty and mysterious atmoSphere, was to fill the audience with an unlimited appreciation for the miraculous wait celled art. . . . the drama was to bethe aid of all expression, an inner 3 significance and an outward spectacle condmed and uni- tied. Hallame/ imitated Wagner's ideas but did not share his lofty view of theatre which Mallarme’ saw as "the poetry of the masses.”33 Theatre was for the average audience and poetry for "the rarer minds."3h The drama, as Mallarme/ saw it, aroused the imagination of the audience by appealing to all the senses at once, by appealing to them directly (not abstractly as did his own poetry); at the same tims the drama never depended upon the audience to complete or to supplement the presented materials. Like the symbolism of the Catholic church, like the symbolism of all ages, the drama was to a en dreams and visions in the soul of the witness . . . . Up to this point only the principles of Symbolism which; have application to the drama have been enumerated. Remaining ideas of Symbolism are excluded because they are relevant to the arts of poetry 30Cooperman, p. 89. 31Ibid., p. 90. 32329.» p- 95. 33Ibid., p. 105. “leis." p. 98. Ssmduwpp- 98-99. 'r,‘ S in: 111 and music in particular. However, some further principles of Symbol- ism more relevant to drama are found in the writings of the Belgian playwright, Maurice Maeterlinck. His essay, "The Tragic in Daily Life," suggests that a play should delve beneath concrete reality and deal with man's inner life and the universe. He wrote, in reference to Sophocles' Philoctetes, that the chief interest of the tragedy does not lie in the struggle we witness between cunning and loyalty, between love of country, rancor, and headstrong pride. There is more beyond: for it is man's loftier existence that is laid bare to us. The post adds to ordinary life something, I know not what, which is the poet's secret: and there comes to us a sudden revelation of life in its stupendous gandeur, in its submissiveness to the unknown powers in its endless affinities, in its awe-inspiring mystery}6 In another essay he expressed a similar view when he stated that the dramatic poet must bring down his own ideas of the unknown into the world of living men, into the everyday world. He must Show us how, under what form and conditions, according to what laws, to what end, the superior powers act upon our destinies, the unintelligible influences, the infinite princ§ples of which he as poet is convinced the universe is full. As part of his theory of drama, Maeterlinck advanced the idea of 38 a "static" drama. Although he later repudiated the concept, it had some relevance to the works of a number of literary figures, including 36Maurice Maeterlinck, "The Tragic in Daily Life," Pla ° hts on Playgigptipg, ed. Toby Cole (New York: Hill and Wang, 1961;, p. 32. 37Maurice Maeterlinck, "Preface to the Plays," European Theories of the Drama, p. 415. 331:. 191.3 Maeterlinck wrote to Barrett H. Clark: "You must not attach too great importance to the expression Static; it was an inven— tion, a theory of my youth, worth what most literary theories are ~- that is, almost nothing." (European Theories of the Drama, p. All). sin: love in: laid I in ccze gran is In snot}, ‘ . dr“ vlc Rs: 01' l hcw , to u Uni; 111 and music in particular. However, some further principles of Symbol- ism more relevant to drama are found in the writings of the Belgian playwright, Maurice Maeterlinck. His essay, "The Tragic in Daily Life," suggests that a play should delve beneath concrete reality and deal with man's inner life and the universe. He wrote, in reference to Sophocles' Philoctetes, that the chief interest of the tragedy does not lie in the struggle we witness between cunning and loyalty, between love of country, rancor, and headstrong pride. There is more beyond: for it is man's loftier existence that is laid bare to us. The post adds to ordinary life something, I know not what, which is the poet's secret: and there comes to us a sudden revelation of life in its stupendous grandeur, in its submissiveness to the unknown powers in its endless affinities, in its awe-inspiring mysteryj6 In another essay he expressed a similar view when he stated that the dramatic poet must bring down his own ideas of the unknown into the world of living men, into the everyday world. He must Show us how, under what form and conditions, according to what laws, to what end, the superior powers act upon our destinies, the unintelligible influences, the infinite princ§ples of which he as poet is convinced the universe is full. As part of his theory of drama, Maeterlinck advanced the idea of 38 a "static" drama. Although he later repudiated the concept, it had some relevance to the works of a number of literary figures, including 36Maurice Maeterlinck, "The Tragic in Daily Life," P hts mm, ed. Toby Cole (New York: Hill and Wang, 1961 , p. 32. 37Maurice Maeterlinck, "Preface to the Plays," European Theories of the Drama, p. M5- 38In 1913 Maeterlinck wrote to Barrett H. Clark: "You must not attach too great importance to the expression Static; it was an inven- tion, a theory of my youth, worth what most literary theories are -- that is, almost nothing." (European Theories of the Drama, p. All). : a1 H U... 112 John Millington Synge, James Joyce, and Leonid Andreyev.39 Maeter- linck believed that the tragic elements in everyday life were more real than those of great adventure. In this he did not differ greatly from the realists and naturalists. But what made Maeterlinck's view unique was his addition of the idea that ”normally tragedy was interior and almost completely without external moven1ent."l‘O Maeterlinck wrote that for him an old man sitting in an armchair but sensing the world around him, "motionless as he is, does yet live in reality a deeper, more human, and more universal life than the lover who strangles his mistress, the captain who conquers in battle, or 'the husband who avenges his honor.'"‘!+1 Maeterlinck pointed out that something akin to "static" drama seemed to exist in the Greek classical plays which de- picted a life that was almost motionless, In most cases, indeed, you will find that psychological action . . . even has been suppressed, or at least vastly diminished, . . . , with the result that the interest centers solely and entirely in the individual, face to face with the universe. . . . ; he is at rest and we‘have time to observe him. It is no longer a violent, exceptional moment of life that passes before our eyes -- it is life itself. Thousands and thousands of laws there are, mightier and more venerable tha‘ those of passion; but these laws are silent, and dis- creet, and slow-moving; and hence it is only in the twilight that they can be seen and heard, in the meditation that comes to us at the tranquil moments of lifeJi"2 Although Maeterlinck was seldom direct in his statenents about "static" drama, it appears that he envisioned a drama all but devoid of plwsical and psychological action which would turn the Spectators' minds to 39Gassner, Treasm of the Theatre; Ibsen to Miller, p. 266. wGassner, Masters of the Drama, p. 1.13. “Maeterlinck, "The Tragic in Daily Life," p. 31. ulbide , p. 320 9°an 3011 1 Tish the in 113 the contemplation of the infinite and universal -- "the atmOSphere of the soul.""3 Maeterlinck found that the beauty and greatness of tragedies lay not in action, nor in dialogue that supported or explained the action, but in a seemingly superfluous dialogue which is addressed to the soul. He observed that "it is just those words that are Spoken by the side of the rigid, apparent truth, that constitute the meterious beauty of the most beautiful tragedies, inasmuch as these are words that conform to a deeper truth, and one that lies incomparably nearer to the invisible soul . . . ."Me Maeterlinck attended this idea to include the use of silence as an im- portant part of the language of drama. He felt that events were deter- mined by "words one cannot hear," that in elements of silence souls whispered a "secret word" to one another.“ It was this dialogue which should be echoed in drama. To Maeterlinck, speech was inadequate to convey real and inmost thoughts; only silence could transmit than from soul to soul.“ Through the use of silence and Spoken words which mainly suggest and imply, Maeterlinck sought "to evoke the invisible, the intangible, the subconscious, and the unintelligible.""7 ”Rm. , pe 3&0 “Ibfle , p e 33 e “ibis. . pp. 33-34- M’Janee Huneker, IconocLas s A Boo 0 Dr s (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1922 , p. 371.. h7StM' p. 63"». The plays w‘rJ Symbolism are dive: 3101‘ representat i‘ asin-each to Great: V‘Ldual differences. bl" certain genera; other. These att: for cczzimicaticn atmosphere , and ,. hen the "fire t“: the uSe of S‘Pnbc' fox- Somethir‘g e; S . Qple defirp' ‘ : “in i ‘m b? t} 3’,“ \501 (fer s ‘ "‘- 4‘: lllt Characteristics of Symbolism General Characteristics The plays which critics incline to list under the heading of Symbolism are diverse in nature and type. Even Maeterlinck, the major representative dramatist of Symbolism, exhibited changes in his approach to creating symbolist plays. Yet, in Spite of many indi- vidual differences, the majority of symbolist dramas can be identified by certain general tendencies which they share in common with each other. These attributes are: 1) an extensive employment of symbols for coxmmmication of thoughts and feelings, and 2) evocation of mood, atmOSphere, and feelings. As for the primary characteristic of Symbolism, it is obvious from the very title of "Symbolism" that such a style is involved in the use of symbols. But, since the word "symbol" is subject to a wide and often confusing number of definitions, it is necessary to discover what particular meaning the term has in symbolist dram. "A symbol in its most direct definition, is something that stands for something else, a thing that stands for more than itself."l‘8 This simple definition is applicable to the three uses of symbols in drama. These uses may be identified briefly as l) the fixed symbol (for symbols whose meaning is generally identifiable even in the world out- side. drama), 2) the contextual symbol (for symbols whose meaning is determined by the context in which they appear), and 3) the indefinite symbol (for symbols whose meaning is involved with inner Spiritual reality) e hBSheldon Cheney, Stage Decoration (New York: The John Day Co., 1928), p. 510 Fixed 5. they do in or: "*4 st‘ :ity 5 Us— - Such symbols 2: ing because t2". has bee: esta'sj 53.22301 could be cause it has t3 does not mean t L7G?! 1d: :5 7 . A." 375. ' ,N T“ . Age ccnue] 1t ”91.35333 4:: play 1 . I Lon e . . ,1 D FR ." :‘O'h .m-‘ m ‘ O A e I He Had“, but rose “mersholm . “ :1 EL- VU" A Jest beches txq; he‘d! mea ‘ “n3 is “Wear. he irldef We ‘ 3’1 the CO 1.15 Fixed symbols found in drama usually have the same meanings as they do in ordinary life. For example, the Cross is the symbol of Christianity and "Old Glory" is the symbol of the United Startesfi9 Such symbols are readily accepted and cause little confusion in mean- ing because the relationship between the symbol and what it stands for has been established through tradition and convention. The fixed symbol could be employed in any style of drama, even Naturalism, be- cause it has the same meaning whether it appears in life or art. This does not mean that such a symbol means exactly the same thing to every individual. Any use of symbol is subject to ambiquity, but the fixed symbol is apt'to be less ambiguous than the other types. The contextual symbol has no fixed meaning outside the drama in which it appears. The relationship between the symbol and that which it represents is established in a particular play for purposes of that play alone. An example of the contextual symbol is found in Ibsen's Rosmersholm where white horses symbolize death. In the world outside the play, white horses have no generally recognized association with death, but Ibsen, early in the play, states the white horses appear at Rosmersholm when a death is about to occur. In this way an ordinary object becomes a symbol within the context of a drama. Although there may be some ambiquity in the use of contextual symbols, generally their meaning is definite and complete within the play in which they appear. The indefinite symbol is used to suggest the relationship be- tween the concrete world and an absolute, intangible reality. "The 49Wilson, p. 20. eternal, visible so straight from t comreheesible eve but beyond that cc of the tildes, inf essence of L“... I‘M-3 _: O o.) fixed by traditic: the 9133' Its me; tangible VCI‘ld be? mitendstcb to "read his own A“ W19 116 external, visible part of the symbol.must be a concrete picture, taken so straight from.the real world that its clear and ordinary meaning is comprehensible even to those who would not search in it for any depth; but beyond that concrete picture there must be open boundless horizons of the hidden, infinite, eternal, immutable and incomprehensible essence of things."50 The indefinite symbol has no meaning that is fixed by tradition or convention. Like the contextual symbol it is selected by the dramatist for purposes of a particular play. It differs from the contextual symbol in that its meaning is not complete within the play. Its meaning is completed in the relationship to some in- tangible world beyond the play and beyond ordinary life. The indefinite symbol tends to be very ambiguous and encourages the individual auditor to "read his own philOSOphy or his own moral into the play."51 An example of the indefinite symbol appears in the water motif of imaeterlinck's Pelléas and Mélisande. water is presented in several ways. Lovers meet by pools of water. Pelléas is killed near a foun- tain. The castle stands over a bottomless pit filled with water. women try to wash away stains on the castle steps with water. Thus water carries connotations of love, death vastness, and futility. Yet these are only personal interpretations. The fact is that "it is im- possible to assign a definite meaning to each of these motifs or symbols."52 They do not guide the auditor to a meaning but suggest several.meanings. 503. c. de Soissons, "Maeterlinck as a Reformer," Living Age, Vol. 221,, No. 3159 (January 21, 1905), 11.1. 51Juliette Knapp, "Symbolic Drama of Today, ,. Poet Lore, Vol. 32 (June, 1921), 232. SZBrockett, p. 290. suggest Spiritual C objective of the :1: $2501 does not no: fixed and contexts: mm Mint is the: rather than reset Names of 51.... 117 The indefinite symbol is the one most often employed in symbolist drama. A play may be identified as belonging to the drama- tic style of Symbolism."when the method of using concrete things to suggest Spiritual or otherwise intangible values is made the primary objective of the dramatic presentation."53 The use of the indefinite symbol does not necessarily rule out the possibility of employing both fixed and contextual symbols along with the indefinite variety. The main point is that the indefinite symbol is predominant. The appear- ance of this particular symbol in significant number is a character- istic of Symbolism. Secondly, Symbolism in drama seeks to evoke feelings and moods rather than present concrete facts.5h It is logical, in view of the principles of Symbolism, that the symbolist dramatists strive for the expression of moods through the use of Symbols rather than presenting direct, concrete occurrences.55 In symbolist drama "the scenes do not hang together at all--there is no sequence of action, only of "56 In plays moods; or rather the same mood persists throughout. such as Maeterlinck's Pelléas and Mélisande, mood is as important as action in determining the play's structure."57 His drama, Egg Princess Maleine,is marked by "intensifications of mood through such atmoSpheric effects as the incessant pounding at the door or the 53Hartley and Ladu, p. 10. 54Blook and Shedd, p. 157. 55Ga.ssner, Masters of_the Drama, p. L12. 56Huneker, p. 373. 57Brockett, p. 291. rag‘ 5”- Cf a V effects "not : is suggested a critics have ; gave a new is; Duetc t! lnfir'te, the ; Sion, the Darya 5390“in the Pla? is ugh-Alb. are raj-AIR“, 5‘: L23 kept, SteadL m. we narrative 11 u , one. £01m in ct n l flitasms s‘dc‘n 5‘! 118 raging of a violent storm."58 In general, symbolist plays gain their effects "not in what is said and done in them alone, but also in what is suggested and felt, although unexpressed and unseen.59 Although critics have pointed out many faults in the drama of Symbolism, "it gave a new importance to the creation of atmosphere and mood." Form.Elements ‘Elgt Due to the playwright's desire to suggest the intangible or infinite, the plots of symbolist dramas have two levels of comprehen- sion, the narrative and the symbolic. The symbolic meaning is supposedly the most important; therefore the narrative level of the play is usually a vehicle of the symbolic. Although these two levels are related, symbolist plays are written ”with the two planes of mean— ing kept steadily in mind and with no confusion of the planes."61 The narrative level of the plot in many cases is similar in nature to that found in other styles. It may be romantic or even realistic, for "fantasies such as Maeterlinck's Bluebird, Sutton Vane's Outward .ggggg, and Sir James Barrie's Dear Brutus and Nagy Rose present them— selves to us as 'real' stories."62 5831ock and Shedd, p. 157. 59s. A. Rhodes, The Contmor§fl £2;th Theatre (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc. , 191,2 , p. 5. 60Block and Shedd, p. 6 6114111ett and Bentley, p. 164. 62Gassner, Form and Idea . . . . , p. 102. One critj plots as an "al Not only is . . . . The story, it i of the plot while the j: is not a"; . subtle so t. heel-twin, than the do the case if, action on the s‘. 0m“ the conflj the H0‘93