-— . __ I.“ ..~——.-w-.fio ~-n"'.m'.. ‘— ww 00-0“”‘7—‘V- '“V‘ffl' \ D ‘ a o -C' it . o C a I I t v u o l . O . I . . O ‘ y ' p , . .. . " - . -. ' _ ~ ,. . -¢ ' ‘ _ .... 4““ __. _ _. ‘3’ w I '0 § . ' a . 5 p ' - ¢ V ‘. 3 ‘ . . _ . ; ‘hv ! U . ‘ , ‘ ,., . __ 'I'w' v‘... .. . . ,‘ _ " °‘ - -'. ..'-_, _" "U‘ -._ -_ .,. . . ~~ -. -. - -~‘-- . -, < ' ..- _ ' ' “32' ‘ Z "' ...-..‘ "3.~....-".- '— a u . - o {‘I . ‘ .1 H _ ‘ . ”‘1'- L“ ,, m- ‘ 00-0 . . -- 1' . j ‘ ‘ - "fi- — ‘- h ‘ '~ ' ‘ ..h‘ ' M‘CH N s m - -..,. " “ ~¢~ I '- - . v . p-O. .‘l- . . I v . __ . .. . , "f‘ ‘ w ‘ ~v- .' ‘ | , ‘ -. ‘ " - V. ' ' - - ~ . _‘ u I . . " .._ 'v—r ..-.. -- .'. ‘. ...l" _ I. .. .‘. :1 r‘ . I "."' . - . _ ‘ . . r- - . I-. . ‘ . v «o 1? ' . ‘.'.‘ ' . . - ", ‘ I" .._ ~ "' . .3 v * .. . ‘ ‘ ¢. - J __ 7 ‘ a ‘. -. . " ‘ --~ ->‘ -~‘ . . . I. , - A _' . f".“t~o a 7 ‘_ . - ' Q’ ' . O -. A. 0 4 - 3‘ ‘ !' 'H . .V ‘ ~ A A" ‘- . . . . . .. . y- - . - s ,'.r . . . a " — t r ... ~ . '."'-‘ ~ ‘ WI ‘ ‘ . . - .-. u ' ‘ -~- .'o . . r. — A” I u " l V "‘ - ‘ - > ‘0" ". ‘ 'D ‘- I x '- . H ‘ ' 0' s —' p . — 0- . ' 0 1?- y ‘ ' " ' - o . - V . & u . - .. 9 ‘ ‘-O '4‘.’ ..._ _ r -. ¢ _ ‘_ . -- .. s ‘ . . - ~ _ . .- -. . _ .‘I, t, - - o . - - . -~- - _ _J 3' . _ ' . ~ . . . __ ' ’vh. - , ‘ . O - .~- - u- ‘ »‘ - ' ”w'. . .U . . . - ~ u _ - _ O T\-. - ' o ' . a ' no a. ‘ . .‘ - ' .. ‘ "- L4 ~.‘.. . .v ' ' ‘ ‘ - 7‘ O - ‘ .5 51‘ _ .- .‘ . , . _ " —_ h; ‘ . . ' ~ .."‘ ‘ — .. ." ‘ ‘~ ‘ fl I - ' ' ‘ ‘ - ‘ . .. 0| . ‘ ' ' _ . . . . «- ‘ - ‘ q" . ' “"‘ -.'.-. ‘ . - - . o’ . . u . - , ' _ _ ‘ .. . _ . ~o - . :4'01 . ' ' ' ‘ _ . . . _" .. ° "“5 - .a.-.. ' . ’ ‘ - v ‘ - ' " c-- ~ --“‘ ‘ "- .-\ ‘ ' . , - ° --~.-- - , -.-- - -.-. . , 0 ~ - ' _ ~ ~ ? ‘ -. .’£‘ . 0 ~ .' q " I - . 0‘ - - o .. . v . . ‘ . - - . ' . v - - ~ , I - . ' u - ' ’ -". - fl ‘ > " . I. ‘ . ' .- ‘l ' ‘. . .p n ‘ I _ - . . . _ » - _ ' - ' - l .. _ i '0 . i . . - . ~o. .- > . I I - . - . ‘ . . .. . t _. _. n- q - - . . ._ ' - V . ' ' ' o 0- - - . . . - o .- -. . - - - . ' ' ' - _. . . o ' u '-.o _ c ‘ . , ' ~ 1 . - . _ . I ~. . l _ . . ’ o‘ . . l , . .4 V ' - o _ < . _ _ - . . I ' . ' ‘ .I , _. . ' ‘3 . _ . I ' - o - . d '_ . , ~ ~ ¢- 1 . — ‘ . . .7 . - , - '2‘ ' _ - . " ‘ ' . A ‘ . . o A- ‘ o . . ' ‘c - . a . . - ‘ . I ‘ . - 'o o I A "' . - . ‘ ‘ _ . . - I . . - _ . ~ -1 . _ . A ~ I ’ -, ‘ . - . _ - , t ‘ _ v _ . - - - _ ‘ - . o - _. . .. - . _ _ _ ‘ - '3 .' . o , . . . , . . . — A u . . ' . . - t .- I 4 ' . n - I . v 1 . ' ‘ . ° . . . .' - ‘ .. . ' I I ' ' o b o . 1 . v v . - Q I ' l o ‘ I °' ’ a .. ~ : A _ ' I o n ‘ A . ‘ o a'. .7 I ‘ ‘ I —- .- - I l c . . .- c - - ‘l l l . ‘ l ' . . - ‘ . . -a ‘ ' ~ I C . ' - I; y , . -.. o - - 1 ‘ fi 0 - - , o .' . I ‘ o I ' v . I I ~ I .o ., - . . ‘| '. . ‘ . o. . ' l . ‘ - I . , - . ~ A , _ -. '7 ' . o- .- . ‘ - - . .1.“ ' ‘ '. . - ‘ "" ' - o _ ¢ , - .-_._ . I. I ‘- - A - ' - . _ -' - ‘ I . - o o ' . _ "n - . .r‘: I g- - -o - _ . I -.. - . . .- .- ’ I . . 1 m - ! Q . .0 . | ,.'t . . . _ l I ' ‘ . . I . a . 1 ‘ ' o . . . I ' I n . ‘ | V $ I ‘ I .0 ' I - o - I ' ' ' . V . . \ ‘. I ' . A n l ' ' . . I . ’ I 'I y A . . u . . I . v v . -.‘ ‘ . . ‘ . _ _ . o . . n I _' . ' . a ' , . .. . . ' 7 o ' o . - -' , .n ' 'o » . ' . o . _ . _ , . _ ; - - . a , u‘ - _' . 0 - ~ ' ' O U . - n c a I l ' ‘ . V . ' I - ‘1 u . ' ’ "- — w < L . ~ . . . .. _ 3 ~ . - - ._ This is to certify that the ' . thesis entitled mar CONTROL I! m nun. ammo: 01' A GROCERY CHAIN 3m presented by ”0930' 3. man has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for L _l_[s.£n._degree mWinOOI Currimlun in load Distribution j Major profe sor Date 0 3 0-169 7‘ ~-_— .yn-n- .“ r. O INVENTORY CONTROL IN THE RETAIL OPERATION OF A GROCERY CHAIN STORE BY Woodrow Harrison Joyner A THESIS Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies of Michigan State College of Agriculture and Applied Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Department of General Business ‘ Curriculum.in Food Distribution 3 - ‘55 1953 ‘\ xx .I‘llllll‘I‘i! II.|I]J|. ll" ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to express his appreciation and gratitude to Dr. E. A. Brand, Director of the Curriculum of Food Distribution at Michigan State College, for his constant supervision, guidance and suggestions contributed to the completion of this study. Sincere thanks is due Dr. Kenneth Wilson, Director of The Division of Business at Michigan State College for his helpful suggestions and advice. Grateful appreciation is extended to Colonial Stores, Incorporated for the opportunity of attending Michigan State Coilege. The author is also grateful to the many grocery companies who contributed information which made the com- pletion of this study possible. TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I. II. III. IV. INTRODUCTION. . . . . . Definition of the Problem Purpose of the Study. Importance of the Study . Limitations of the Study. Procedure Followed in Obtaining RECEIVING MERCHANDISE . Checking Warehouse Shipments. Checking Drop Shipments Time of Delivery. . . Container Returns . . Case Price-marking. . / MARKING MERCHANDISE . . Information Results of Illegible Price Marks. Incorrectly-priced.Merchandise. Stamping Methods. . . Price changes. . . . Price-change Credit . Authorization Lists . STOCK CONTROL. . . . . Definition. . . . . . Broken-case Merchandise Customer Breakage . . Stockroom.Training. . Stock Rotation . . . . PAGE (0 <0 40 Gobm'Nl-JH to u) to P‘ :4 P"I4 or: ed P’ ID N) C) -4 m.-oa c» In N) <3 £01003” 03010310 o 0 Q q o O . O 9 g o a - c O o p o O y r o a O u o o I O O o O O o CHAPTER V. VI. VII. VIII. PILFERAGE CONTROL. . . . Importance . . . . . . Preventive Measures. . Handling Offenders . . Employee Pilferage . . Salesman Pilferage . . ACCOUNTING PROCEDURES FOR RECORDING CHARGES AND CREDITS. O O O O C 0 v . Charging Merchandise to Store. . Inventory Loss Allowed Credit for Uhsalable Merchandise Approving Credit Memos Office-fund Audit. . . CHECKOUT PROCEDURES . . . Type of Checkstand . . Losses from.Inaccurate Checking Causes for Checkout Errors . . . Accuracy of Checkers . Checker Training. . . Employee Purchases. . SUPERMARKET PERSONNEL. . HWPiement. ’. '. °. 3 Employee Carelessness. Employee Dishonesty. . iv . PAGE 28 28 29 31 33 53 35 35 38 38 4O 41 44 44 45 47 48 50 52 53 53 53 56 CHAPTER IX. PHYSICAL INVENTORY. . . . . . . . Responsibility for Taking Inventory Inventory Retakes . . . . . . . Preparation for Inventory . . . Procedure for Taking Inventory. x. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION. . . . . . Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . Conclusion. . . . . . . . . . . Recommendations (Check list). . BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . APPENDIX A Questionnaire . . . . . . . . B Letter. 0 O O O O O O O O O 0 PAGE 58 58 51 62 62 65 65 72 74 79 8O 85 TABLE 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 99 10. 11. 12. 1:5. 14. LIST OF TABLES PAGE Methods Used to Check Incoming Shipments from Company Warehouse. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Person Responsible for Checking Drop Shipments. . 8 Period in which Merchandise is Marked During Receiving Operation. ‘.' . . . . '.' . . . ‘,° . .10 Types of Stamps Used for Marking by Super Markets.l3 Frequency of Regular Price Changes in theSuper' . Market . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15 Methods of Extending Credit for Regular Price. Changes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18 Equipment and Methods Used to Decrease Customers Breakage . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .24 Types of Training Programs Used for Stoskroomh Operations and Stocking. . . . . . . . . . . . . .25 Methods of Rotating Stock. . . . . . . . . . . . .26 Preventive Measures Against Pilferage. . . . . . .3O Importance of Stock.Arrangement as a Device for Controlling Pilferage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30 Procedure for Handling Pilferage Violators Who 4 Are First Offenders. . . . . . . . . . ._. . . . .31 Methods of Charging Merchandise to the Stores. . .35 Boss‘s? Esquires bv.Msmbess of ths Gracery InduStry O O O O O o O o o o o o O o o o o o o o 038 vii TABLE 7 _ PAGE 15. Percent of Companies Giving Credit to Stores. for Merchandise Losses. . . . . . . . . . . . 39 16. Person Approving Credit Memos . . . . . . . . 41 17. Frequency of Store Office Fund Audits . '.' . 42 18. Types of Checkstands Employed by Companies . Surveyed. .R. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 19. Results of 95 Shopping Tests Made in Nine‘ Chains on Orders Ranging from $1.88 to $8.31. 46 20. Frequency with whichCashiers are Checked for Accuracy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 2l. Length of Initial Training Period for Checkers 51 22. Procedures for Handling Employee Purchases. . 52 23. Person Responsible for KeepingDelivery Door Closed During the Day . . . ._. . . . ‘.° . . 54 24. Methods of Enforcing a Non-consumption of . Food Policy in the Supermarket. . . . . . . . 56 25. Persons Responsible for Taking Inventories. . 59 26. Comparison by Departments of the Length of I InventoryPeriods in FortyGrocery Companies. 60 27. Reasons for Using Inventory Retakes . . . . . 61 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE - . . PAGE 1. A Form Used by the Accounting_Department of a Grocery Company. . . . . . . . . . . . . .V. . . 37 2. A Form Used for Taking Inventory in the Store. . 63 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Definition of Problem Inventory control, as used by the grocery retailer of today, includes many phases of the retail operation. The relation of stock on hand to sales, the amount of inven- tory required on hand and the efficiency in handling the physical inventory can all be classified as phases of in- ventory control. In this study, inventory control is con- sidered as the control necessary to maintain a balanced inventory in the grocery department of a retail chain store. Only that control which is necessary to obtain. and maintain an inventory with a minimum amount of loss is included. The problem arises from the inability of store managers to disclose and control factors which con- tribute to inventory loss at the store level. ‘Purpose of the Study The purpose of this study in inventory control is to consider the factors which cause inventory losses in the retail storesand to determine the importance of each. The problem.is to find better methods of control and to determine the factors to consider when an investigation is made in the store. It is the author's primary purpose to present the procedures used today by members of the food chain industry. Ideas obtained from these operational pro- cedures may suggest better inventory control methods to establish. This information was obtained through a ques- tionnaire which was sent to fifty food chains. The results of the questionnaire are the basis for this study of inven- tory control. Importance of The Study A need for a study of this nature is evidenced by the importance of inventory control in the operation of a retail store. The amount of money lost each year by the grocery in- dustry through inventory loss is difficult to determine. A large number of factors which could contribute to an inven- tory loss accounts primarily for the complexity of the prob- lem. Since the degree to which each factor is involved is difficult to measure accurately, grocers find the problem still more difficult to solve. "Shortage may be caused by theft, by breakage, by loss, by physical shrinkage, by mis- measuring and by overselling. There is no way to determine how much of the physical loss is attributed to each of these factors."1 It is hoped that this study will make some contri- bution to the food industry by pointing out methods which may benefit store managers in their endeavor to obtain better con- trol over their inventory. 1. Jehn W. Wingate and Elmer O. Schaller. Techniques of Retail Merchandising. New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc. 1950. p. 226. Limitations This study is limited to the operation of the grocery department and all reference, unless otherwise mentioned, will pertain only to the grocery department operation. The perishable nature of the items handled by the produce and meat departments makes necessary a different type of opera- tion and the problem, as defined in this studyz, does not consider the operations of these departments. The size of the store or company is not taken into consideration although the discussion is concerned mainly with chains having central accounting departments, company warehouse service and top man- agement located outside the stores. Self-service stores that include mainly groceries with a small amount of non-food items are referred to as average stores. A one-floor Operation is implied when reference is made to the operational procedure of a super market. As stated by the definition of inventory control, only those procedures which deal with maintaining the correct amount of physical inventory on hand is consid- ered. When warehouses and delivery equipment are mentioned in the study, the assumption is made that the grocery com- panies own and Operate this property. When "the survey" is mentioned in this study, reference is made to the contact made by the author with executives in grocery companies through the questionnaire. ¥ 2. See page 1 Procedure Followed in Obtaining Information A list of fifty grocery chains from every section of the United States was selected from.the 1951 Directory of Grocery and Supermarket Chains. No scientific sampling was performed since the purpose of the list was to include the major food companies in each section of the country. A questionnaires, along with a covering letter4, was sent to an executive in each of these companies. This questionnaire was constructed to follow the outline of this thesis and included questions pertaining to various phases of inventory control. In addi- tion to facts regarding procedures, the questionnaire requested information regarding methods, policies and opinions of top management. The questionnaire was sent to fifty companies, of which forty replied, an excellent return of 80 percent. Therefore, when reference is made to the survey, it is im- plied that the number or percent used is based on the forty returned questionnaires. The questionnaires received were then edited and tabu- lated for use as a basis for ideas and conclusions set up in this study. Particular attention was given to the different answers submitted by food executives and extreme care was exercised in their interpretation. A master answer sheet 3. Complete questionnaire appears in appendix A. 4. Complete letter appears in appendix B. was set up to facilitate a more rapid determination of the results. Although a few sources of information other than the questionnaire are cited in this report, the results of this survey are used as the major authority. The responses by the grocery industry and the information obtained from food publications made it possible to bring forth methods that could aid the grocery industry in mastering some of the problems of inventory control. CHAPTER II RECEIVING MERCHANDISE Checking Warehouse Shipments A check of merchandise received by the store is con- sidered in this study to be an important phase in inventory control. First of all, shipments are received from the comp pany warehouse which is the store's major supplier. The sur- vey shows that on the average 20 percent of the incoming mer- chandise is received at the store through dr0p shipments. Therefore, 80 percent of the incoming merchandise is received through warehouse deliveries. Since warehouse shipments con- stitute such a large portion of the shipments received, it would seem desirable to establish a reliable method for check- ing these shipments. TABLE 1 METHODS USED TO CHECK INCOMING SHIPMENTS FROM COMPANY WAREHOUSE Methods USGd Number of Companies Piece count of merchandise 11 Item count of merchandise 24 Piece count and item count 4 No check 1 Total 40 7 Table 1 shows that the method most frequently used and considered the most effective is a check by item against the warehouse invoice. An item dheck requires the employee to find the item in question and then check this item off the warehouse invoice. Twenty-four companies out of forty have established this method as the one to use in their respec- tive company. It can be seen that the piece count method is widely used but not to the extent of the item count method. The piece count consists of a count of the items charged the store by number only. Based on the results of Table l, 11 of the forty companies use the piece count method. Regardless of the method used, it is desirable that the grocery manager be positive that he receives all the mer- chandise with which he is charged. Checking Drop Shipments The remainder of the merchandise received by the store can be placed in the drop shipment category. As stated pre- ‘wbusly, on page six, an average of 20 percent of all merchan-