THE ECONOMIC TREATMENT OF BLIND PERSONS IN THE UNITED STATES Thesis for the Degree of M. A. Arthur N. Magill 1935 I mm mm IlDlPS gr ‘ 7‘: 4"" r\- .- ‘m {liniV- ‘ (9., ‘l'.’ J ... ' )‘,';.'.gl:) '._ I ‘. 3."? 23:52.1! . l. ‘7“ a" “My #3311 74 ' ‘ .. .' -. a ; (-11.1 '6‘ 1., 3' 1 .«_:~ $337., a“ " 1“ HEM . L. ‘Tt‘uVVCf-A )- I .j,<{.1"nwr;m 7. . . “,5;\¢‘é:"-"rq.k_ -\ .-' ...‘v‘sfi'llv «fl (-Z‘OJ‘ J ' \.f¥“.-.' . ‘ W} -.‘.dw ‘ . h '.\T ‘l. '- hi- - ' ',I ..‘.. l . ‘ ...o ' _- . . v F _ hr" «2' .’- ‘r 3*.“ (-11 o x; 3., -. . '1‘“. f g o. kt‘gf *' .' .fi‘z’ ' x a} r 4 .13 § < ‘l ‘ ~ L»??? [D {5' ' -’ . O. l'\ r- '4'? {‘11. . -‘ . 13“! _ . . -" n c .. -.‘- . {Ki )4}. A} fl", . v... *7' ‘3 : at} 33‘8“ ," +. " .0 ‘ .~ _ I u w‘ I? __ j ‘ - "4L." - ‘ —? ;'. ‘5 L" ' AC '="'§a':?"1&"-‘ "‘5‘. v ‘1’ .1 "i “W".s oh' J . l I I‘ - _ ’ ,' “- -(;;, i I. . .: ‘ _ - _ . - 1 ’ It: k‘mLSW . . .2 4: k } ' ' -. . ,5 ,fi‘ ’ “ 2 -, 'u'_ 11.31“, .6"". . ‘ Ks ' ‘5 ‘ V g s . . ' . a I; ..‘\, I I‘ n . _ ,1 I, _ .‘ . .v , — v _ ‘ ‘g l."_ ' . " I‘ I -' I1:- 37¢“- "H '. . . . :. -.“ -~'. . . _ - . . u ..'.. I} ‘. I. ~. “ ...'.- ‘ a " l o '.' "qu; . l_. \ ‘.“ an 3 . ' V ?. C ‘ l 7" O ' ‘. V ' - . x'. “ h .1 7"“. u -\ . .~ .. ‘ - a, a . , . .- l I a .-~1‘ - 1.. ti . . 13.. ’ h 2‘. ' . \ .“ .. . o o.- i ‘. :- . A . ' . '-'~ ‘ ‘ . ‘_ .’ . ' ‘l ;_._ . ‘ L..'.‘~... v - , r 5 ,_ ...‘ . ‘1" , " ‘ "; .._ . . a u I - V .. Jab ‘- " ‘ ‘ I W x I 1:. I , . . "t“ v ...' ‘ . o. . Kc ~ {5 —, '1 ‘7: m. ‘h v...- V.- \ g.- ”I .. v '~. :20 ~ _ -_ . '5 4 € . ‘ - - .2 K 2" . -'-K W" ‘9' “"579: " £51..» 9"} '.- ...‘.-1. f “W‘n > ‘ « THE ECONOMIC TREATMENT OF BLIND PERSONS IN THE UNITED STATES A Thesis Submitted in partial fulfillmont of the roquirements for the degree of Master or Arts Michigan State College Arthur N. Magill 1935 WRAP-".9? ACKNOWLEDGMENT The presentation of this study has been made possible through the particular kindnesses and peraonal efforts of Dr. Harold S. Patton. Head of the Department of Economics. and Professor WilliaI‘Haber of the Department of Economics in Michi- gan State College, East Lansing. Michigan. 99135,» PREFACE The amount of information concerning the blind and their rehabili - tation in useful occupations is extremely limited. The latest informa- tion available in the reports of the United States Census for the year 1920 indicates that there are same 68.000 blind persons altogether in the United States. Accurate studies concerning the problem have been made infrequently. The National Society For the Prevention Of Blindness, for example, estimates that the number of blind persons exceeds 115,000. The literature concerning the methods of assistance, occupational train— ing and retraining, is also very sketchy. Fortunately, this has been counterbalanced to a certain extent by other printed matter which deals with both the activities of the blind, and activities carried on for the blind. Knowledge has been dissemin- ated through various media which have informed the public concerning the Braille system - how it is written, the libraries carrying a Braille department; the education, psychology, social and economic conditions of the blind; the recreational pusuits of the blind; and finally, the part played by science in the lives of the blind. Mention should also be made of the splendid work done by the National Society For the Pre- vention of Blindness. The following pages are principally based on material dealing with the economic condition of the blind. flais material was secured from the special research library of the American Foundation For the Blind through the assistance of Miss Helga Lende, librarian. It was in the form of articles written by both workers for the blind and instructors of the blind, and appeared in The Outloongor the Blind, The American Association Of Workers For the Blind, and The American Association Of Instructors Of the Blind. Other datafwas secured from the files of the Department of Rehabilitation, Lansing, Michigan. through the kindness of Mr. John Lee and his secretary Miss Bassor. This material has been supplemented by information obtained from reports of surveys made in various states at different times. Very much assistance was also se- cured from the book by Dr. Harry Best entitled, "Blindness and the Blind in the United States.” Obviously the person handicapped by the loss of sight is econom- ically at a terrific disadvantage in competing for a job. He can be employed in industry in only a limited number of occupations. His training for employment must be specially prepared. Hissknowledge of industrial conditions is not secured at first hand. Economically, he is dependent. To secure work he must frequently rely upon the good will and philanthropy of an individual or organization. “Bargaining power" normally possessed by industrial workers usually is not possessed by the blind man. This thesis seeks to summarize the economic condition of the blind in the United States, to examine various methods of aid, both public and private, and to describe the special methods of Rehabilitation of 131 cases through the aid of the Department of Rehabilitation, and to evaluate the results. CONTENTS CHAPTER I. The Economic Condition Of the Blind In The United States........ II. Public Assistance For Blind Persons...... A. Pensions For the Blind............... B. TicrkShops For the Blindeoeeeeeeeeoeeo III. The Placement Of the Blind In Private Industryeoeooeoeeeeoo A. The Blind In Competitive Industries.. B. Concession Stands.................... C. Blind Persons In Professions......... IV. Vocational Rehabilitation Of the Blind In LuChiganOOOOOOOOOOO. v. ConCIuSionSOOOOOOOOOOO....OOOOOOOOOOOCO. BibliographyOOOOIOlo00.......0...'...OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Page 11 12 15 22 22 30 51 33 49 52 TABLES Page Table I. Percentage of the blind gainfully occupied in comparison to the percentage of total pepulation gainfully occupied............. 1 II. Percentage distribution of the blind accord- ing to general occupation................. 2 III. Iercentage of the blind self-supporting according to occupation................... 5 IV. Percentage of the blind gainfully employed according to amount of annual earnings in the different occupations................. 6 V. Percentage distribution of the blind accord- ing to the means of support............... 8 Case Studies of 131 Persons Who Contacted the Department Of Rehabilitation Of Michigan......... 36-43 CHAPTER I The Economic Condition Of The Blind In The United States With increased industrialization the Opportunities for the blind are limited. The development of our civilization has been made large- ly by visual initiative. with the inevitable consequence that sight is the prime requisite for practically every occupation or line of endeav- or. Those who do not possess this requisite find it incriasingly diffi- cult to secure remunerative employment. But insofar as employment is secured, the reliance upon partial or complete aid is minimized. The percentage of the blind in the United States. grouped accord- ing to age (ten years of age and over). sex. and race gainfully employ- ed is indicated in the following table: TABLE 1: Percentage of the blind gainfully occupied in comparison to the percentage of total population gainfully occupied in the United States.*(l) = Per Cent 0 Total General . Blind Population . Race - Nativity l 10 20 a eauals.i_Esmalsi t_Eamale. Total....... ”=22; .__ZLJ.._ whit‘::::::::::::::: . 5.9 19.2 Native........... 26.7 6.2 19.3 Foreign Born..... 18.9 5.0 18.4 Negro............... 21.3 4.7 38.9 Indian..............1 14.9 4.8 11.5 According to Dr. Best. this table shows that a considerable portion of the blind are occupied, thus providing in part. at least for their main- (l)Best. Harry “Blindness And the Blind In the United States“ - pp.218. The statistics are taken from the reports of the United States Census Bureau of 1920 relating only to persons making special report. Statistics for the year 1930 are not available. s2. tenance. This group should be considered as the best among the blind:- thoee possessing the physical or business abilities necessary for hold- ing a Job. One-fourth of blind males are gainfully employed, while for the general population three-fourths are gainfully employed. Among blind females the proportion is less than one-twelfth (7.8 per cent), which is a little over one-third of that for the general female popup lation. Of all the blind gainfully employed, 17.8 per cent are femalesr as against 20.5 per cent for the general population. In making these comparisons it must be borne in mind that many of those included among the blind have become blind as the result of senile decay, and are too old to do any work. It must also be kept in mind that many of the individuals who are blind are also suffering from some other handicap which prohibits their entering any occupation. Table II indicates the distribution of the blind and of the popula- tion at large in the several general occupations from 1910 to 1920: TABLE II: Percentage distribution of the blind according to general occupations.(2) A = Per Cent Distribution General Blind - . op 1910 1920 H 920 in g T. Male Fe. T Male Fe. fl Male Fe. 4 Total..........,100!0!10022! 0 tioggoflioogguiooeo!10950! Agriculture............... 18.9 28.3 7.3 13.2 14.6 6.6 29.8 12.7 Extraction of minerals.... Oes 0.3 eee 0.2 0.2 eee 3.3 eee Manufacturing and mechanical industries... 30.1 27.9 43.6 43.1 41.8 48.8 32.9 22.6 Transportation...........y 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.4 8.6 2.5 Trade 22.3 24.2 7.6 17.6 20.8“ 2.7 10.8“ 7.8 PUblio SerV1cO...........> 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.5 0.5 0e 2e3 0e3 Professional Serice....., 15.7 14.6 22.5 14.0 12.7 20.0 3.4 11.9 Domestic and personal sen. 7.4 6.2 14. 5.5 3.8 13. 3.7 25.6 “Clerical occupations....., .... .... .... 3.9 3.5 5. 5.1 16.7 UHClaflsificabl. e 3e 3e on Des 009 eee eee The larger proportion of the blind are gainfully employedtmanufacturing and mechanical industries (43.1 per cent). While these are the callings (2)Best, Harry, Ibid. pp220. 3. which have the largest representation in the population as a whole, the prOportion is not as great as with the blind. Trade has the next high- est proportion (17.6 per cent), which is also considerable larger than that of the general pOpulation. Professional service has the third highest preportion (14 per cent), which is approximately three times as high as with the general pepulation. In the remaining groups the pro- portion for the blind (13.2 per cent) is about one-half that for the gen- eral population. In domestic and personal service the proportion (3.9 per cent) is about one-half. In transportation the preportion (1.5 per cent) is about one-fifth of that of the general pepulation. The repre- sentation of the blind in this class of occupation is relatively the least of all, with the exception of the extraction of minerals (0.2 per cent). In public service the prOportion (0.5 per cent) is about one- fourth of that of the pOpulation in general. The larger proportion of the blind in manufacturing and mechanical industries as compared with other occupations can be attributed to the lesser difficulties encount- ered therein, and also to the inclusion under this general head of cer- tain processes often of simple handicraft character to which the blind have been able or permitted in limited measure to turn their hands. The high prOportion in the professional callings can be accounted to the inclusion of such occupations as teaching and instruction in music. The prOportion is also made up of a considerable number of blind persons who have found it possible to pursue their profession after their blindness. "As between the sexes, the prOportion of male blind is relatively great- er in agriculture, extraction of minerals, transportation, and trade; and of female blind, in the remaining occupations save public service (in which the prOportions are equal). (3) The majority of the blind are largely engaged in certain particular (3) Ibid. pp221. 4. callings. Approxiaately three-fifths (58.4 per cent) of the male blind listed pursue seven occupations, each of which gainfully employs more than 5%. These occupations are:broom making, farming, retail dealing, piano tuning, playing and teaching of music, chair caning, huckstering and peddling. Three-fourths (74.1 per cent) of the male blind are en- gaged in fourteen occupations, each employing more than 5 per cent. The additional occupations are : general laborers, agents and canvassers, agricultural laborers, neWSpaper carriers and news dealers, clerks and salesmen in stores, basket workers and clergymen. All but about one- sixth (15.2 per cent) of the male blind are engaged in twenty-seven occupations,each of which has more than 0.5 per cent. (4)* “Female blind persons are found to be fairly well represented in the occupa- tions which have been regarded as especially suited for the blind, and for which Special vocational training is provided - plain and fancy sewing, playing and teaching of music, chair caning, basket working, weaving, carpet and rug waking, and broom mlking. Some of these repre- sent handicraft processes engaged in at home, and taught possibly through special home instruction. (There are 19.2 occupations which characterize the special shOps - some being engaged thereat in the homes.)” Needle trades are occupations to which blind women turn rather readily. Other occupations of a more general character, in which the proportion for the blind is larger than for the population at large include farming (as own- ers or assistants), agents or canvassers, boarding-house keepers, retail dealing, literary work, semi-skilled labor in printing, huckstering and peddling, and general labor. It might be significant to note that stenc- graphy is an occupation to which a large number of blind women are turning of late years. *(5) (4) Ibid. pp. 225 (5) Ibid. pp. 230 5. In TABLE III is given the percentage of blind males and females who are reported as self—supportingdn the principal occupations in which they are engaged, based on the Census of 1920: TABLE III: Percentage of blind self-supporting according to occupation(§) = Occupation Per Cent 0f Total Male Total -‘ 45.2 Agriculture:..................................... 54.2 Fumuw..u.n.u.u.u.n.u.u.u.n.u.n fihl Agricultural laborers........................ 41.4 Manufacturing and mechanical industries.......... 37.9 Laborers, building and general............... 19.1 Broom makers................................. 34.1 Piano tuners................................. 61.7‘” Chair caners................................. 15.5 Basker workers............................... 2&.5 All other......... ..... ...................... 51.7 Trade............................................ 51.9 Retail dealers............................... 64.0‘ Hucksters and peddlers....................... 31.5 Newspaper carriers and news dealers.......... 35.0 Clerks in stores and salesmen................ 51.8 Professional service............................. 58.6 lusicians and teachers of music.............. 52.2 All other.................................... 71.4” Domestic and personal service.................... 38.0 Clerical occupations............................. 36.9 Agents and canvassers........................ 27.3 Female Total.................................. ._______£EL£;________ Manufacturing and mechanical industries.......... 13.9 Seamstresses and fancy workers............... 6.0 All Othereeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee 19e5 Professional service............................. 48.1“ Musicians and teachers of music.............. 34.8 Domestic and personal service.................... 33.1 This table more fully reveals the actual economic condition of the blind. The prOportion who are self-supporting is surprisingly small among those reported as engaged in some form of remunerative employ- ment. employed are self-supporting. (5) Ibid. pp. 244 Less than one-half (46.2 per cent) of the blind males gainfully Less than one-third (30.5 per cent) of 6. the female blind are self-supporting. The proportion for both sexes is 43.4 per cent.‘(7) Table IV indicates the annual earnings according to occupations. TABLE IVsPercentege of blind gainfully employed according to amount of annual earnings in different occupations. *(8) 1 Occupation . ss.. 5188 (13355_"31500.. than to to to and A 3100 3399 3799 $14.99 Over Isle Agricultu‘OOOIOO......OOOCOOOOOOOOOOOO 15.; 42.6 19.4 7.3 ¥ 4 15.5 Farmers............................. 13.1 37.7 22.0 18.0 9.2 Agricultural laborers............... 26.1 55.0 10.0 7.1 1.4 Manufacturing and mechanical industriesJ 13.3 40.1 28.7 12.8 5.0 Laborers, building and genersl...... 38.5 44.6 13.5 3.4 ... Broom makers........................ 10.9 43.6 37.7 6.3 1.5 Piano tuners........................ 6.6 21.3 21.6 34.4 16.3 Chair cesers........................ 19.6 57.3 21.7 1.4 ... Basket workers...................... 20.8 41.6 35.1 2.6 ... Trade................................... 10.4 35.2 26.5 16.4 11.5 Retail dealers...................... 7.3 25.8 30.6 22.8 13.5 Hucksters and peddlers.............4 16.9 56.0 22.7 3.6 0.9 Newspaper carriers and newsdeelers.. 13.8 51.1 22.3 12.8 ... Clerks and salesmen 5.1 17.7 38.0 22.8 16.5 Professional service...................l 9.7 24.7 20.2 27.2 18.2 musicians and teachers of music..... 13.1 29.5 20.7 25.1 11.6 All others.......................... 6.2 19.7 19.7 29.3 25.1 Domestic and personal service........... 22.7 40.3 20.1 13.6 3.2 CICrio‘l occupations.................... 11o? ‘ael 22.7 13.0 ‘es Agents and canvassers............... 14.0 55.4 20.7 8.3 1.7 Female Total.........................W Manufacturing and mechanical industries. 51.8 35.9 11.7 0.4 0.2 Seemstresses and fency'workers.....4 76.9 20.5 2.1 0.5 ... Semi-skilled operatives............. 33.6 47.0 18.7 0.4 0.4 Professional service...................4 12.9 35.6 29.4 20.2 1.8 Musicians and teachers of music....4 21.7 49.3 18.8 10.1 ... All other........................... 6.4 25.5 37.2 27.7 3.2 42.6 9.9 4.0 ... Domestic and personal service.......... 43.6 Along malesw‘he sum of 8800. or over per annum is earned by more than one- third (36.3 per cent) retail dealers, and by almost two-fifths of clerks and salesmen (39.3 per cent), though by only a little more than one-fourth (27.9 per cent) of those employed in trade. It is also received by more (7) Ibid. pp243 (8) Ibid. pp. 249 7. than one-fourth (27.2 per cent) of the farmers. The real preportion for farmers is considerably higher, as many of this group report only actual cash receipts, no allowance being made for products consumed on the farm. This same condition also exists in the case of retail dealers, some of whom fail at times to include personal expense met from business receipts. Well over one-half of the persons engaged in the remaining occupations earn less than $400. per year - four-fifths of those employed as agri- cultural and general laborers, three-fourths of those employed as huck- sters and peddlers, and two-thirds of those employed as agents and can- vassers, newspaper carriers, news dealers, and domestics. 'Chair caning is the poorest paid of the employments of the blind, over three-fourths so engaged receiving under 3400. per year. Basket workers fare somewhat better, and broom-makers slightly better still, though almost two-thirds of the former class and over one-half of the latter have earnings under $400. per year. The prOportion in any of these occupations receiving as much as $800. annually is extremely small. These amounts may be regarded as fairly typical of the earnings received in the so-called special occupations of the blind.“ *(9) An appreciable per cent of the occupations reported by the blind are irregular pursuits and oddjobs, the earnings accruing therefrom amounting to very small sums, which at times are little more than chari- table offerings. With females, earnings in the several occupations are usually very low. In general professional service,slightly under one-fourth (22 per cent) receive $800. or more per year. The preportion among musicians and teachers of music is about one-tenth, though in other professional pursuits it is much higher. 0n the other hand, a very large proportion (9) Ibid. pp.253 domestic and personal service, and semi- killed operatives receive \ e ‘34 .. p . tnan p400. per year; of the seamstresses who reported,over three- ibout one—half of stenographers have 2110 3.“ ‘3 e "In table V is given the percentage distribution of the blind according to means of support as found on investigations in Massachu~ setts (1901, 1900, 1919, and 1925), New Jersey (1909 - 3 investigations) Pannsylvania (1909), Wisconsin (1928}, Minnesota (1924), Californis ations, and New York (1928)." *(10). \l 2 (“O O \1/ \ \. H . :3 < (‘9 (I) c+ t... 09 :aBLE V: Percentage distribution of blind according to means of support. Per Cent Distribution Means Of Support fiasrachusetts New Jkrsey Pe n. ‘v§:: ’ 22:” finnerCaliiornia _ m <2> <3) <4) <1> <2), <1) <2) * ‘ sin <1) <2)_ Total...............lO0.0.lDO.Q.lO0,0 100,0 100,0 100,0 100,0 100-0 100-0 100.01 ... 20.7 28.3 16. 17.2 O... O... 14.1 0... C 9.5 .00. 6.5 0.0 ‘0. Self-supporting.............. * ' Entirely 5918-5upporting..... 43.8 29.3 18 9 Fartly self-supporting..,.... 4.7 15.5 10.4 4-5 Independent income........... ... 16.3 .... 13 4 Partly self-supporting 9 7 9.3 eee 9 O or independent.,......... ....l ....; .... .... .... .... .... .... -.- Housekeeping................, .... ....1 5.4 7.8 .... .... .... .... ... Dependent on family......... .... 30.0% 20.8 .... 33.2 .... .... .... 27. Dependent on relatives...... .... ....i .... 22.1 .... .... .... .... .-. Dependent on family or relatives............7 35.3 ....7 .... .... .... .... .... .... ... Dependent on family, relatives or frisnds....q ., . Dependent on private aid...., 1.3 ....1 Dependent on relatives, friend or charitable societies.4 .... ....t .... .... . .. .... .... .... ... Inmates of priVate lnst...... .... .... .... .... Dependent on pensions of all kinds............. .... ....2 .... 7.5 5.3 .... 4.9 .... ... Dependent on general 3 public pensions.......... 1.7 ....l .... .... .... .... .... 6.8 ... Dependent on pensions for g the b1i1d................ .... ....§ 3.0 .... .... .... .... .... ... Dependent on public aid...... .... 13.0‘ .... 2.1 .... .... .... .... ~-- Inmates of public Inst. ..... 3.8 ,,,,; 2.6 .... 8.5 4.8 8.3 8.4 84- Inmates of Inst. of all kinds..... ....l .... 8. .... .... .... .... ... Dependent on compensation, corporation benefits,etc. .... .... .... .... .... .... .... . "' (HQ 034 I la‘tendicantS..eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee l4.) 1 (a N 030 O... .0 O .0 O I. O I. O O. O C. O .0 O O. O D. O O. O .0 O 20.0 16.6 3. 3. e'vee (Us) 26,0 O... O... 18.9 "'1 TABLL V:(continued) A «~~ W“ Per Cent Distribution Keane Of Support a Massachusetts New Jersey . 1 {1) v (2') " (25) (4) £1) (3) 3100.0.1oo.o;1oo.o.100.0.1oo.o.1oo.owiti. _«:¢-:qr-:-.- , To*"l Ub—eeeeeeeoeceeeaeee 9e J i C“ e con- ifioto. Einne, ota California. (1) (2) 100 e01 100.0. 100. Lincrs..........................i .... ,.,.. 1:3.~ 13.9 .... 11.6 ... Dependent on 3 her aid..........; .... ....I .... ....l .... .... ... inmates of nrivaee institu+ions 5 l or supported by charity.....l .... .... .... .... .... .... 8. iiscellaneous...................I 11.4 7.5. 3.7L. 3.6 .... .... ... 25.6 5.3 a small proportion of the blind can be considered independent, as tney are in possession of personal resources which afford them a private income. This pronortion ranges in different states and communities from i a fev :8? cent to cne~third, dependins on the definitions involved. For ° C, \ the country as a whole, the pronortion of the blind population, ten years 4‘ ‘ r ,s ' . ‘ s. r (t : v‘ + rescited as liv1ng on tneir own means is 7.6 per cent for o .- 2 {’12 o o r over ales and 4.9 per cent for lemales. The remainder of the blind, or tw0«thirds of tnsir entire number, are supported in three general ways: by the assistance of families or friends by some form of private aid of less direct or personal character; but for the most part through alnsgiving or institution and non~institutional pro- vision. nny conclusions concerning the economic condition of the blind must be hedged about with qualifying circumstances. The above quotations and tables indicate that only a very small preportion of the blind are entire- lv self-supporting. Thev are receiving an income from work, sufficient t support themselves, or are enjoying a private income. Those who do not support themselves are unable to secure a position or are physically unfit. The individual may be both young and unfit, due - v I 5 ‘ ' 4 a + V‘ ‘ to several reasons, which are important care only insofar as ~hey prelent his employment. Others, blind because of old age, could no longer meet (10) Ibid. pp. 253. s. 10. the demands of industry. Many are unable to procure a position due to the lack of vocational training, and placement agencies.*(ll) It should be borne in mind that the blind man has relatively little bargaining power. Those blind who are working have secured their position in the majority of cases through the medium of a placement-man or agency os- tablishsd for this particular purposo.*(12) On the whole it must be said that very few of the blind are self- supporting. Tho great majority are not able to secure employment either because of lack of opportunity, or they are physically incapacitated other than being blind. (ll) Irwin.R.B. "what Increased Rehabilitation Funds Might Do", Rehabilitation Review, v.6, No.3, Mar.1932. pp66-68. (12) LaDamo, M. ”Securing Employment For the Handicapped; a study of placement agencies for this group in New York City. New York, Welfare Council of New York City, 1927. pp.133. Loavitt, M.A. I'Handica.pped wage earners. New York. 1928. Jewish Social Service Association Inc. Chpt. 5. 11. CHAPTER II Public Assistance For Blind Persons Because such a small number of the blind are self-supporting, the great majority must receive aid in order to exist. A large por- tion of this aid is secured from the immediate family. In some cases this imposes burdensome responsibilities which cannot be borne and forces the individual to seek assistance from other sources. The pension is a form of aid adOpted by many states. It was thought that assistance in the form of an outright subsidy would be most beneficial to the blind. The granting of a small pension was considered less expensive than building and maintaining a large in- stitution. This permitted the individual to be independent and. to enjoy the comforts of his own home.‘(13) The establishment of workshOps is another form of pension or subsidy. The philosophy underlying this workshop system is that the majority of the blind would rather earn or partially earn their liv- ing than to receive direct aid. In many instances the earnings of the workers offset to a large extent the eXpense incurred in their maintenance, which decreases the necessary governmental apprOpriations. These workshops offer both training and boarding facilities for the workers. I'(lt‘l) Even though the workshop provides employment by which he may, in part at least, pay for his maintenance it is still a form of subsidy or pension. (13) Baker, E.A. "Pensions For the Blind", Canadian Report. MacKenzie, Clutha N., ”Memorandum On Pensions For the Blind of New Zealand'. Minutes and proceedings of House of Commons - Feb. 21, 1935. Canada. Best, Harry "Blindness and the Blind" - theoretical con- sideration XLVII p. 534; practical appl. XLVII p. 549. (14) iaSSachusetts, Special Commission on the blind. Report re- lative to the employment, training and pl cement of the blind. 935. 55 p. Leavitt, W.A. "Handicapped flags Earners" Yew York. 1928. 12. The other forms of employment sought by the blind are in direct competition to sighted workers. But in order to compete adequately, they must receive training either at some of the schools for the blind or through some rehabilitation agency. Because the public is not ac- customed to the competition of the blind in trade and commerce, it is difficult for them to secure employment without the aid of an organi- zation. Thus they find that the bargaining power for their employment rests in the hands of an organization, or a representative of a place- ment organization. PENSIONS FOR THE BLIND - The first public pension system for the blind in the United States was created in the City of New York in the year 1866, when the city department of charities was permitted to give the blind monetary assistance. -The grant to one person was not to exceed .850. a year, the total amount available being $20,000. annually. (In 1897 the amount was to be increased to not more than 3100. for any per- son, the total amount not to exceed $75,000. In 1913 the law was amend- ed to permit the grant of $100. to each applicant, with a total annual allowance of $150,008} In 1923 the maximum amount per person was rais- ed to 3300., with $200,000. as the total sum. In 1898 a statute was enacted in Ohio as an amendment to the poor law permitting counties to grant the sum of $100. a year to worthy blind men and women having no property or other means of support, and who had been in the state at least five years, and who had resided in that particular county at least one year. In 1908 a ltw was enacted which provided for the creating of special commissions in each county, who were to have control over the levying and distribution of the funds. Needy blind persons were also carefully defined, and permitted relief to the extent of $150. per year in lieu of all other public aid. In 1913 in' of' He‘: fol Co.‘ H 5‘) p-A 1! I la (1'. r‘. 13. the law vested the powers in the regular boards of county commission- ers. In later years the laws have been amended. In 1903 Illinois adopted a pension law for the blind, which was permissive until 1915 when it became obligatory. Wisconsin followed in 1907. In 1910 graduated relief was granted to he blind in the state of Massachusetts. In 1911 Kansas also adOpted a pension law. Missouri added an amendment to her constitution in 1915, which provided for the granting of pensions to the blind. In 1920 this law was again amended. *(15) In 1915 four other states enacted pension laws: Iowa, Nhine, Nebraska, and New Hampshire. Similar laws have been enacted in the following states: 1917 Idaho; 1918, New Jersey; 1919, California and Colorado; in 1920, New York; in 1921 Connecticut and Washington; in 1923, Arkansas; in 1924, Kentucky; in 1925, Minnesota and Nevada; in 1928, Louisianna; in 1929, Naryland; and in 1931, Utah.*(16) The above laws were enacted because it was felt that the particu- lar individuals would receive the pension, would not be able to support themselves in any way, and were a charge upon either their friends or the community» (although these laws have been called I'pension laws", they cannot be compared with other laws bearing the same title. Numer- ous pensions have been granted to war veterans, widowed mothers and to those injured in industry, as a partial compensation for their previous contribution and service to society. Some pensions have been granted to handicapped groups, as the blind, not on the basis of compensation for service, but on the basis of incapacity due to physical disability, and (15) Baker, E.A. "Pensions For the Blind" MacKenzie, Clutha N.. "Memorandum on pensions for the blind of New Zealand'. Minutes and proceedings of House of Commons. Feb. 21, 1935. Canada. Best, Harry ”Blindness and the Blind" p. 534, 549. (16) Sullivan and Snortum, “Problems in placing the handicapped" p. 551. Best, Harry Ibid. p. 551. ha '0 SI 14. thus becoming an outright grant, or dole.: //fMany Opposed to the granting of pensions to the blind, present arguments, discrediting the pension system, which will be discussed according to their significance. Dr. Best has said that if at least half of the blind in the United States were accorded a pension of not more than three hundred dollars a year, the cost to the tax payer would approximate thirteen million dollars. 0n the surface this seems prohibitive, but when one considers that a number receiving this pension should be obtaining an old age pension, the figures are less startling. It is somewhat true that such a pension is discriminatory from the point of view of other incapacitated groups who object on the grounds of partiality. They are of the Opinion that it should extend to all classes of the disabled.\\ Perhaps the most outstanding criticism is that the pension has a degenerating effect upon its recipients. The individual, it is said, loses his initiative, no longer desires to provide for himself, and in many cases, develops a “pension-complex" - the government owes him a living; he no longer needs tovork. There is often doubt in the mind of the pensioneer, and the public at large, as to reasons for the pen- sion. Neither party is certain as to whether the pension is a form of direct relief, or a form of compensation for a physical handicap. Those supporting pensions for the blind also present aguments in favor of their beliefs, of which the most important is that the pension system is the only means of support for a portion of the blind. Work- shops and institutions could not include all without sight, thus the pension is the only source of income for many. This type of relief is both economical and easy to apply.§ If the elastic rate were substitut- ed for the flat rate, the law would be more Just, for the amount the 15. individual would receive would depend upon his particular circumstanceg The receiving of a pension often means the welcoming of a blind individu- al into his home. The pension law has merits which should be the basis for its consideration. The pensions for the blind would not suffer be- cause of the accusation of discrimination, for each pension covering a specific class should be based on the merits of that class. (lt is but natural that a law such as this should have many weak- nesses. Vicious compromising often accompanies the passing Of a law through the state legislature, necessitating additions and substitutions. However, there are numerous improvements which could be incorporated into the pension laws, in whole or in part, depending upon the particular law. The use of a flexible provision in the law to take the place of the flat rate has already been referred to. The applicant for a pension should be carefully scrutinized. Only those recommended by a certain number of re- putable citizens should be eligible. The pension should consist of com- bined state and local funds. This would make the law uniform in all the counties within one state, and it would also place the county administra— topdn a subservient position subject to suggestion from state officials, which would in a large measure tend to do away with any political impli- cation concerning the distribution, which may arise. *(17) The law should remove the stigma of direct relief, as much as possible:> WORK§§OPS FOR THEgELLE2.- WorkshOps, as previously mentioned, have given aid to many blind peOple and originally were associated with schools for the blind. This affiliation was due, in part at least, to the belief that because vocational instruction had been given, it was their duty as a school to provide industrial employment for graduates and others. In the year 1840, an employment department was Opened for some Of (17) Baker, E.A., "The Canadian Pension Law”. Special report on the blind. 16. the former pupils of the Perkins Institute in Boston. Three years later this was extended to include other adult blind. The school provided quarters for both classes. In 1850, a special appropriation from the state made possible in part a special plant. In 1865 a laundry was set up for women, but it proved a failure, and was abandoned in 1867, although the shop for men has continued with little change to the present day.*(18) New York and Pennsylvania established shOps for adults as an exten- sion Of their work which were’soon abandoned. In 1845 an industrial de- partment known as the "Home for the Industrious Blind" was created in Pennsylvania for graduates, which in 1849 was extended to include others. 6n the year 1848 the state legislature apprOpriated funds for the direct. benefit of the shOp, which continued during the remaining years of its existence. Funds were also raised from private sources. It was soon found that the market did not absorb a large portion Of the gOOds manu- factured resulting in a glutting of the warehouses. After ten years of trial the trustees for the school admitted that the venture to provide permanent employment for adult blind was not a success. In 1857 it was stated that although the shop had continued Operations, it had incurred a heavy loss. In 1862 the legislature repealed the laws relating to the shOp, which automatically closed the industrial department of the school. In the same yeara charter was granted to the New York Mechanic‘s Association, an independent organization furnishing mechanical education to the blind, and assisting in procuring employment for those found capa— ble. The financial support was derived from small intermittent appropri- -... -..—- ations of the state and city governments, supplemented by private endow- r. ment. This plan was discontinued after a trial of eight years. In 1851 Pennsylvania started a workshOp in connection with its school. In 1885 “”WMA(18) Massachusetts. Special commission on the blind. Final report of special commission to investigate relative to employment, training, and placement. 1925- 55P- 17. it was abandoned, although for the first twelve years of its existence it was considered a success. The founding of two other institutions of a private nature resulted in the reversal of its fortunes. In 1858 Maryland also established a department in connection with their school. As in the cases of the other states it only admitted graduates in the beginning, but in 1874, it accepted other adult blind. This was also abandoned after a trial of about four years. Haryland stated that she did not need this type of shOp for the blind. The school however re- tained a department until 1908 for some of its graduates. In several other states the matter of schools and workshOps was prOposed, among these were the schools in Illinois, Louisianna, Mich- igan, and New York. *(19) The experiments of the schools are credited with little or no success for they were limited from the point of view of duration. It must be said, however, that they afforded an eXperimental proving ground upon which the independent sheps were built. The first independent workshop was located in Philadelphia, Pa. in 1874, and was known as the Working Home for Blind Men, designed to draw the adult blind from the institution. This institution still con- tinues as a private concern although it has received aid from the state at various times. The next undertaking was in Louisville, in 1882, known as the Kentucky'whnufacturing Establishment for the Blind, which continued Operation for about a dozen years. The first direct public measure was the creation of the California Industrial Home for the Blind, at Oakland in 1885, which has been regularly in receipt of state support up to the present time. Four establishments came into being within the next five years, only one of which was of a permanent nature. In 1886 (19) Best, Harry. Ibid. p. 496. 18. Ohio established an Industrial Home at Iberia, which lasted for only ten years. In 1887 Illinois created the Illinois Industrial Home in Chicago which exists to the present. In 1888 a private establishment was created in St. Joseph, HissourL which lasted but a few years. In 1890 Iowa created an Inlustrial Home at Knoxville, which was abandoned after about ten years. Drting from this period the shops which have been created, whether of a private or public nature, have been more or less permanent. This marked the spread of industrial workshOps for the blind throughout the entire union.*(20) As we know from our previous study a large penvcentage of the blind do not enter into competitive industries. Either they cannot se- cure employment or they are not capable of meeting sighted competition, - the worksh0p was designed to accommodate the latter group. The organ- izers of the workshop were of the opinion that although many of the blind could not wholly maintain themselves, they could all assist in their support. This would capitalize the individual's assets now lying dormant, and relieve the degradation of outright relief. Many of the blind prefer living in homes and sheltered institutions. The organization of each workshOp varies with the theory underly- ing its particular type. The snap in its simplest form is found in either a separate establishment or in connection with a school. This shop affords trade instruction and a limited amount of occupation for a selected few. A more complex type of organization is the industrial factory, which differs from the average only in that it employs blind labor, with a minimum amount of sighted labor for purposes of super- vision of processes,etc. A third type which emphasizes instruction (20) Establishment of Michigan Employment Institution at Saginaw in 1903. Final Report of Massachusetts Commission. Ibid. pg. 41-48 Best, Harry. Ibid. pg. 502. 19. more than production, combines vocational training with boarding accommoda- tions.*(21) The last type is the combination institution which differs from the above mentioned form only in that its labor is secured from two sources: the institution itself, and the adjoining residential district. If the shops are privately owned, the sale of their products, pri- vate donations and sporadic governmental appropriations take care of the necessary running expenses. The state owned shops are supportedfrom the sale or their goods, regular state appropriations, and private endowment. e(22). Regardless of the ownership of the workshOp, the problems surround- ing the organization and its functions are more or less similar. These, for purposes of simplifiCation, may be designated as internal and extern- al. The internal problems are many and various, for although these shops are subsidized, their natural income is expected to defray the larger portion of their cost, which means that a certain degree of efficiency must be maintained. The policy of theshop must be determined. Is it to be a training school, or a productive unit? If a training school, a definite curriculum must be provided. The length of the course and the amount to be paid during training must be considered as well as the placement of the individual within the shop at the completion of his apprenticeship. The trades taught in this type of an organization are limited, and great care must be taken in the choice of workmen so that quality may be maintained. Those processes, prohibitive because of blindness, must be performed by sighted workers. The object of pro- viding work for the blind is thwarted if too many visual workers are employed. Obviously, sight is necessary to supervise the quality of workmanship, and to carry on certain functions within the establishment. (21)Massachusetts. Final Report of Commission. 1925. (22) Best. Ibid. pp. 625, 615. Massachusetts. Ibid. pp. 42-49, 20. The determination of a wage rate is a serious problem. If the worker resides within the institution his expenses are less than that individ- ual working in the shop, but living in a nearby community. It is essen- tial that a fair wage be paid but its determination is a delicate prob- lem.(/In many cases the wages of the workers have been augmented in order to secure for them a so-called "fair wage". *(23) 3 The external problems confronting the workshops are as serious. There is the matter of marketing the finished products. Marketing the finished products in competition to similar goods generally necessitates selling below cost because the competitor is more efficient. To meet competition it is necessary that the quality of the goods be above re- proach. The goods should be sold on their merits alone, and not because they are made by the blind. If the goods manufactured by the blind can- not be disposed of, the warehouse will be overstocked, meaning reduced output, - either a layoff, or a seasonal production, involving the es- tablishment of shifts to provide part-time employment. Some of the workshops’ severest competition comes from other shelt- ered industries,- as broom making, chair caning, basket weaving, etc. Prison labor is the strongest competitor in the field of broom making, gwhile eleemosynary institutions afford competition in the other industries traditionally relegated to the blind: If certain industrial pursuits were assigned to the workshops for the blind, and others were given to the prisons and other institutions, it would be possible to eliminate this vicious competition and duplication. By absorbing the products of these workshOps the government would to a great extent solve their marketing problem. The articles needed by the state departments, should be purchas- (23) Sullivan and Snortum. "Placing the handicapped..' pp. 413 Best. Ibid. pp. 490. 21. ed from these sheltered industries. Besides providing a constant market it would decrease governmental expenditure. The appropriations necess- ary for their maintenance would be less as their income‘would nearly ap- proximate their costs. Many criticisms have been levelled against the workshops for the blind. It has been charged that it would be much less expensive to grant a pension. It has also been charged that workshOps are success- ful because the state grants to them a monOpoly for certain types of products which the state departments purchase. These accusations are true from the point of view of pure business, but surely there are other considerations. The sheps are more expensive than an outright grant, but the granting of a pension prohibits the recipient from earn- ing what he receives. In the workshbp his wages depend upon his ability. Thus in part he knows that he is assisting ipghis maintenance. The same principle applies to the accusation that jobs are created through forced buying of the several departments of the state. If these workshOps are closed, a certain class of peOple are deprived of the "priceless blessing of toil',-Qhe boon of mankind. 22. CHAPTER III The Placement Of The Blind In Private Industry The modern factory is so con- stituted that it will secure the greatest efficiency with least risk. New safety devices are constantly being introduced to protect the un- thinking sighted worker. The blind worker is usually more cautious near machinery than the sighted man.*(34) He is more apt to abide by the rules of safety listed in the shop than the average worker. Jobs should never be sought for the blind on the basis of their handicup. Only those Jobs which can be done equally as well, if not better, by the blind should be considered,- Jobs of a comparatively simple and repetitive nature.*(35) ("Be content with those Jobs in which blindness is no handicap, and at which a blind person possessing prOper qualifications can produce equally with the average sighted worker and Without special arrangements.”*(36)§ (32) Fox, Journal of National Institute of Ind. Psy. 1931. No.6 pp. 332-343. (33) Clunk,J.F. ”Placement as a business" 0.F.B. v. 26. 1932. pp. 16-19. (34) MCKay,E.C. Survey of factory employment. A.A.W.B. 1927 pp.53-68. (35) Dean,T.N. "Restoring the Disabled To Industry“ (36) Baker,s. and Clunk, J. "Employment of blind" World Conference. New York. 1931. Proceedings. p. 166-182. 27. The good placement man will always consider the point of view of the employer as well as his client.¢(37) Jobs should never be secured for blind applicants if they cannot approximate the efficiency of their fellow-workers. The placement man should reject Jobs, as well as suggest them, as this policy would gain favor with the potential employer who would be assured that the welfare of his concern as well as that of the blind worker is being considered. This will lead to greater satisfact- ion for both the employer and the employee, as the employee would be placed only at that type ofvork which he could do efficiently. When the blind individual is placed, in his Job, it is essential that he be shown his particular function by the demonstrator accompanying him, for he will not be able to gain a knowledge of his particular function, through absorption, and as he will in all probability be the only one placed, the segregated method of instruction cannot be used.*(36) After placement, periodical visits should be made to him by the plucement agent to see that he is an efficient worker. It should never be necess- ary for the employer to discharge the sightless man.*(39) His efficiency should be observed by the organization responsible for the placement Which should remove him immediately, substituting another. As a general rule this is most satisfactory to the employer, for he feels that a sincere interest is being taken in his affairs, and that no effort is being made to make him subsidize handicapped labor through the donation of Jobs. When the employer is first contacted and actually sold on the principle that those functions requiring handskill only, can be done effieiently by peeple without vision, the very fact that one or more needed to be re— moved, will not shake his faith in the principle.*(40) (37) Clunk,J. 'Placement...‘ 0.F.B. v.24. No.1, June 1930 pp. 16-19. (38) Sullivan,O.M. "Problems ...' Rehabil. Review. Oct. 1933. p. 92-109 (39) Nickerson, G. ”Placement Work” 0.F.B. March 1927. pp. 15.17. (40) Nicherson, 6. “Getting Jobs ..' 0.F.B. Sept. 1930. p. 12-13. Clunk,J.F."Placement as a bus..."O.F.B. June 1930. pp. 16—19. 28. 1! RThe principle of blind labor as a commodity is only feasible, when this commodity is in demand, or can create its own demand. In the maj- ority of cases, it is necessary to create its own demand which is usually accomplished by making a survey of various industries to determine which processes in each industry can be satisfactorily handled by the blind worker. In the year 1922, the Division of Re-education of the State Board of Education of Minnesota conducted an exhaustive and detailed survey of factories in St. Paul, Minneapolis, and Duluth. "The plan followed, was to hire a blind man who could serve as a demonstrator. For this purpose Mr. John Stackpole, a graduate of the State School for the Blind, at Faribault, and an employee at the time for the Victor Broom Shop in Minneapolis, was engaged. He proved to have an all-around abil- ity in mechanics, which was very useful in the experiment. The only possible drawback was the possibility that he did not represent an aver- age or typical blind person. This was offset, however, by the consider- ation that at any rate, as far as the blind were concerned, the experi- ment was being made under favorable conditions. Much preliminary work had to be done in order to bring the nature of the experiment to the attention of employers of these three cities, and to emphasize the need of cooperation on their part. This was accomplished through the press, the platform, and personal visits. A classified list of industries and commercial plants was used, and a selected list made. By the process of elimination, those willing to help in the experiment were listed. The next step was to make a casual survey of the plant by one acquainted with industrial organization, in order to note operations that might be adapted to the try-out by the blind worker, (usually more were listed than could be used); talking with the plant superintendent, and the various foremen, and enlisting their good will in carrying out this experiment.*(4l) (41) Special research into Opportunities for factory employment of the blind in hinnesota' - Bulletin, Misc. 453. pp. 3. 29. It is very encouraging to note the results of this survey. “It proved that ninety processes in the factories of the three cities were feasible for blind persons. Not all of these processes are feasible to the same degree nor are all of them organized as separate Jobs. Sometimes the question of whether the particular process will consti- tute a Job varies with the size of the factory; in other instances, the practice of the trade determines this.'*(42) The following summary of this survey made by the Division of Re- education of Minnesota might well be included here. I'It may be said that the research was continued far enough to prove that a considerable number of factory occupations exist which could be performed by blind persons. lither further study in time of greater industrial activity or the constant every day efforts of agencies interested in the blind should reveal more and more of such opportunities. and bring about more and more placements of blind persons in this field. Along with and ‘~___--" following any such efforts will undoubtedly need to be a prolonged pub- licity to acquaint employers with the possibilities to be found in blind workers, and convince them that it is better economically for the state to utilize handicapped persons in such a productive manner than to iscard them, and eventually force them upon grants of public or pri- vate relief. At the same time that efforts are made to place such a \__ ‘.____ program Of factory employment for the blind before employers. attention should be given to acquaint the blind so that they may avail themselves Of these Openings. In most of the processes that have been listed. school or institutional training would avail very little. The necessary skill must be attained on the Job. However. there undoubtedly are alter- ations in the plan of education of the blind, which could be made to pre- (42) Ibid. Minnesota Bulletin. 30. pare them better for factory life and factory workers' -ode Of liveli- hood. Entry into such varied fields as have been described would tend to bring the blind more into contact with the normal population, and to decrease the tendency to make Of them a segregated and peculiar fraction which exists now partially upon the few occupations open to them.) CONCESSION STANDS - Let us now consider those individuals who preferring to meet the public, earn their living by salesmanship. For”his group the concession stand affords a most desirable form of occupation. There are three general types of concession stands: "the dry stand", usually located in hospitals, city halls, and public buildings, which sells articles of the package variety; "the canteen” is a combination stand usually located in a factory, and sells both package goods and limited hot refreshments; “the cafeteria", the final and more complex type, handles complete line of refreshments and package goods involving a much larger layout than the other two. Canada has an interesting method of handling her concession stands, which differs from the method prevalent in the United States. According to Clunk their stands are a combination Of the chain store and independ- ent ownership. They are chain stores, in that all operating rights are held by the Institute, and any operator can be removed at will; nor can he sell, lease, or dispose of the concession in any way. Regardless of his investment in the equipment, he has only Operating rights. The business is individual, in that the operator is responsible for his pur- chases and contracted liabilities. He enjoys the full profits,iand is permitted to continue indefinitely subject to satisfactory service to his patrons, and management acceptable to the Institute. In the United States the concession stand may be secured by an agency. As a general rule, it is given outright to the individual se- lected to Operate it, or this individual may secure the stand for him- 31. self. The Operator in the United States is entirely independent of an organization. He owns the equipment, and the continued Operation of the stand depends upon the type of service rendered, its profitableness and the policy of the building management. When the management finds it necessary to remove the Operator, the concession is generally lost to any other blind person. The Canadian organization never loses a con- cession stand. If the individual is not giving the type Of service Or quality demanded by his patrons, he is removed. and another man takes his place. This maintains the concession for the blind, and permits nO Opportunities for blind employment to escape through carelessness or mismanagement. In Canada the Operator also receives the benefits of a plan known as the "Merchants' Association", which enables him to buy from the Institute, which in turn buys at Jobber prices.‘and distributes mer- chandise to him for cash. The net profits at the end of a three month period are divided in prOportion to the purchases of the members. This dividend is received in addition to their ordinary and regular retail profits. gggnn PERSONS_I3 THE PROFESSIOJ§ - Some of the blind prefer profession- al work, and therefore have pursued higher education.*(43) fThe per- centage of blind who receive a higher education and take up a profess- ion is relatively small. According to the data‘obtained from various countries§iit appears that eight percent of all the blind, capable Of education and employment, are receiving a higher education. In this eight per cent are included, also, those who take training in music, commercial occupations, and massage.{ If you will Omit these last men- tioned occupations, two per cent would be more correct.fi If this small percentage is to be placed efficiently in professions, it is essential (43) Strehl, Karl. "Higher education Of the blind and their chances in the professions" pp. 3,8,9. 32. that, ”only the exceptionally talented, physically healthy and determin- ed blind person, who has a decided preference for mental work should be encouraged to enter a University. If these requirements are fulfilled, the blind intellectual worker will probably make a better living than a blind manual worker; eyesight will be less missed by the blind man in the intellectual field than by the blind handworker..3(44) There are a number of positions in public or private Offices, or in the Open employment market, which could be filled by the really com- petent blind persons. It is essential to give individual guidance in order to put the right man in the right place.{/It will never do to divide the academically trained blind into a few groups and give them this or that kind of work indiscriminately, but individual guidance will make the most of vocational potentialities. It is always easier tO find an Opening for one or two, here or there, than to find work for whole groups of Job seekers.\ } (44) Strehl, Karl. ”Higher education of the blind..." pg. 10. 33. CHAPTER IV Vocational Rehabilitation Of The Blind In michigan Public interest was aroused on behalf Of handicapped peOple in civil life by the passage of a congressional act which provided for the rehabilitation of disabled soldiers, sailors, and marines follow- ing the World War. The question arose during this time of the feasi- bility of extending this program to include that far greater army of persons disabled in civil life. Statistics revealed that approximate— ly two million were crippled each year in industry, with a probability of sixty thousand of this number being so crippled as to be subject to charity unless some remedial provision was made. The same statistics reveal that for every non-fatal industrial accident there were two non-industrial accilents, which did not include an even greater number disabled by disease and congenital conditions. 1any of this group are cripples of long standing, Who have been deprived of an education and vocational experience. The majority of those who receive an injury which results in a disability are immediately relegated to that group Of labor considered as unemployable. This means that employment for them in the future Will be rare unless economic conditions demand the expanding of the labor market, or a position is secured on thebasis of charity which almost invariably means a subsistance wage. If a position is secured through the facilities of an agency the bargaining power Of the indi- \ Vidual worker is enlarged, and he is able to procure employment on the basis Of his economic utility. The passage of the Federal Civilian Rehabilitation Act, effective July 1, 1920, provided for the systematic functioning Of a rehabilita— tion program within each individual state. This act provided for an ‘34. annual allotment of federal funds on the basis of population to be avail- able on condition that for each dollar of federal money expended the state must apprOpriate at least an equal amount. By the passage of Act No. 211 of the Public Acts of 1921, Michigan accepted the provisions of the federal act and appropriated the required amount of money. On April 8, 1930, the ”ichigan State Board for Vocational Education adopted a plan which was later approved by the federal board, providing for more intensive rehabilitation service for the disabled peOple of Wayne County by centralizing the service and reducing the duplication of effort of the many and varied social agencies. The plan was to continue for a period of one year, and if at the end of that time it was found to be satisfactory to all coOperating agencies, it was to be renewed. This plan of c00peration has continued to date. The Rehabilitation Department is an agency within the state, support- ed by both federal and state funds and dedicated to the Job of reclaiming the human wreckage of our industrial and social society. This reclaima- tion takes the form of attempting to re—establish in industry those who have within themselves some economic asset which can be capitalized. Vocational guidance assists the handicapped individual to determine the possible future source of his income. The Department provides special training wherever it is necessary and practicable, from the standpoint of both the individual, and the local community. If the program of re- training is not found to fit the individual case, placement without train- ing is resorted to when a vacancy occurs which the applicant can fill with efficiency. No position is sought by the Department on the basis of sym- pathy or charity. Only positions which can be successfully filled by disabled individuals are sought. The activities of the Rehabilitation Department have been substan- tially increased by F.E.R.A. aid, dating from December 15, 1933. In a 35. period of one year the case load increased approximately 35 per cent; the number in training increased 33 per cent. The number placed in ' employment in the first nine months of this fiscal year (1934-35) was f‘ 38 per cent greater than the number placed during the first nine months of 1933. The following chart summarizes 131 cases of blind persons (5% vis- ion or less) which were handled by the Department Of Rehabilitation of the State of Michigan in the Department of Public Instruction from the time of its inception in 1921, until April 1935. CASE STUDIES OF PERSONS WHO CONTACTmD DEEARTMENT OF REHABILITATION OF MICHIGAN .Jé- Case Sex Age [Locality Number [ Education Cause of Date of Contact Types Of COSt 0f Subsequent Earnings No. a Depends Blindness With Rehabilitaq Training Training Occupational Before After ‘ ents tion Department Experience 3 Training Training 1 21 Big None High Accident- 5% April 1923 :aIESTanship and 325. E $15' Wk' Rapids School vision ““1““ m°th°ds 2 V 30 Big 2 5 th Electric flash February College Preparatory $100. .Auto and brass 5 70¢ hr. Rapids grade from welding 1922 Ferris Institute shOp; farmer a — r ~«» . i E M 21 Detroit None 8th é Shot on 5 December :iano tuning 339. piano tuner; ; 33.50 day grade { hunting trip E 19¢4 typist broom . H l 7,- 7’ MV— - A .- ”an: [Ha-hi {lg ‘ 4 M 18 Rockford None Dynamite 3 January Typewriting $55. Carpenter $15- WK- explosion ; 1928 ' s: 35 . Grand 2 None Explosion g Jul“ 1933 Finisher in 37% hr ‘ . -, f ’ , o Rapids § § furniture factory; i j 3 , i i.“ ‘y 6 M 43 Detroit 5 5 Birth June 1931 ; $112.50 $3500. yr , g i month _____ ; 5 ,_n o 7 ,,,_~_lm_,olr-- e .~ 7 j , ‘ g 7 M 32 ; Detroit None 8th Spinal . piano tuning $98. Hemmed towels $10. Wk. 3 3 grade Meningitis October Detroit League E f‘ . i E 19‘9 for Handicapped .— f ' 1 8 M 45 Menominee l S Cataracts Novgmber ChirOpractor ChirOpractor $1000. annum $100. month ‘ 1'd2 12 years 9 M 31 Manistique 4 March 19¢2 Cigar and confect- Construction work 315. wk. ionery store 10 M 19 Grand Home High Birth August Massaging $300, .7310. wk. Rapids School 1931 ‘ Y.M.C.A. Grand Rapids 1 11 M 31 Concord None 11th . Scarlet fever November Practical $35. Day laborer $20. wk. grade 1924 Poultry 12 M 28 Detroit None “’32:? Piano tuning $10. Wk- 13 M 18 Detroit; None High February Typing and $18. 315- Wk- SChOOl 1924 Dictaphone { 14 M 39 Detroit 6 October Inspector in $42. Wk. 1931 Ford Motor Co. ' ~ ~ Hi h Con enital T October Inspector in $42“ Wk‘ 15 M 38 Highland 2 g g 0 Ford Motor 00 Park School 1-31 ' . Broom maker 320. wk. 15 M 43 St. Joseph None “£533" saus'nansmp CASE STUDIES OF PmRSONS WHO CONTACTmD DmPARTNfiNT OF RNHABILITATION OF MICHIGnN (continued) r J7. 5 "9 e . - i 1! h 32 Flint 2 5th April 1923 Imperial Wheel Work 40¢ to 50¢ grade Champion Ignition per hr. § Flint Varnish Works *5 M 40' DetI‘Oit 2 High Injury April 1932 Placement Agent for «$57.69 Wk. 3250. wk. 3 SChOOl State of Mich. and § Canadian Government 1 l“ q M g i . Literature, science 382. Placement Agent for $1200. Yr. T s h 25 ann arbor 5 1 High November and arts at U.ofM. Blind ; g School 1921 § 20 M 34 Detroit None 7th Injury October Revised Braille 3150. Sales York $24. wk. 3 grade 1928 Insurance Sales 1‘ 2'1 M 23 Saginaw None 5th Injury April 1923 Shoe repairing lfiunition Plant grade 22 F 39 saginaw None 11th November Switchboard Opera- grade 1923 tor for 16 yrs. $18. wk. 25¢ hr. 23 M 61 St. Charles None 6th February Farm hand for 45 318. month §l2. wk. grade 1922 years 24 N 24 Saginaw None 4th Injury September Shoe repairing Piano tuner $24. wk. $40. per grade 1922 month $7.; v - one ___~. mar-- ~ 7 — ~ 1..-... x A i ' M 37 Detroit None 4th March 1931 1215. wk. ;‘* grade r " 6 M 49 Highland None 8th Injury in October Assembler 12 yrs. #42. wk. Park grade army 1931 Engineer in army 27 F 18 Jackson None 8th Accidentally January Home weaving shot 1922 A .4. 28 M 23 Jackson 1 8th Sore eyes January Common laborer 4Or hr. grade at birth 1922 29 M 46 Detroit 2 10th 4“”, August 'Insurance Sales- $50. Insurance Agent $50. Wk. $20. t9 grade 1929 $25. WK- 30 M 19 Detroit None High Injury February' ' Dictaphone Operat- $75. $100 Wk~ School 1929 ing 31 M 17 Detroit None Congenital September Piano tuning $156. Orchestra - tenor $25- Wk- 1926 banjo 32 M 41 Flint } None None April 1923 Sailor for 25 501 hr. , r i years 7‘ w—_7UH “_H‘m*~"~wnwfli _ E 20 Detroit no 10th Birth October Piano tuning $222.12 None $22, per wk. grade 1931 M 43 Detroit None High Congenital September Inspector at Ford $43- wk. School condition 1931 Motor 00. M 25 Flint None Kigh Congenital October Broom maker. rug 350, month School condition 1931 weaving, chair caning fi 21 Flint None 10th April 1933 Sailor — 2 yrs. 50¢ hr. grade Lathe worker 95 M 20 Detroi t None 5th Injured by June 1923 Dictaphone i1 . to $1 . 50 grade fire shovel; Operator day bicycle ace. 9. F 34 Detroit None 11th Congenital June 192 Braille music $108. Sales promotion $19. to $45. $20. wk. grade catere ts Social Service Organist, director week 4.,_ _ 1 - _- 7 of music n 20 Flint 2 8th March 1923 Grocery business i35. Wk. 50¢ nr. grade 11--»17 , fl 0 I I t ’- 1 M 50 Detroit 10th Accident March 1932 chair caning maChIHISt 720. WK. $15. Wk. grode Apple vendor $8. wk. " ’ ” " " 'a- “..‘. —* ----“__..4___._.....-A, ""7—' fl ‘ . . r 3 A {’1' M 53 Detroit 5th Glaucoma Yerch 19 2_ Piano tuning Pattern manor :1. to $1.45 45. per grade per hr. piano ,3 M 47 Uetrgit 10+h October InSpector 13$ yrs $30 to $42 $42. wk. grade 1931 WBGK 1V1 _ 74,w__lwr_ ' ~ 9 Shoe repairing $20. wk. M 24 Lansing None 10th shotgun July 1923 . grade acoldent M 31 Flint 5 3m apri 1 1923 Farm work 9?“ 45¢ hr ' ”redo truck driV1ng q 4. v m - , on ' ' .; 65 88 month n 40 Pigeon None 8th Injured eyes e sugust 1923 Shoe repairing 3208. é - grade points of Perrigo-Saginaw shears . - ~ ~2 . n n 55 hr M 26 Flint 3 9th April 1943 Operator in gas 3200. m0 t ¢ . * . com an ”rode p y .. . i -. , 2 wk and H 29 Vonroe gtn govemoer Chair caning, news $7. wk. 31 . “‘ ” ' __,, 7C2; paper, street mu51c- up ‘LI’L‘I": ' n t , dd 1 105 *eer“ry Inspector at Brigg #32. wk. $32. Wk. ‘1; ‘- 1‘ j + r ' I , 1'1 131‘" [123. E?) J- C‘” . E‘kl. 30 Q8 vrdlt C T 7' i “7‘:\ 14ng Co.; mlner in grade ~80» Lava . a @an o: ) trilt ‘o-e Tlgh Dise TIN rt ' 'cié’; . I e i . Q L-e 2"»; . 2 var.»- -._§ _' . o it 7‘ . ’_I a. .{x r 7". ' ' -. 3.34; ‘e e .- :_ r'f‘t ., ne’ nth 'fltI‘ ’,"' 4 .3: .e. .. I . ,«to {.‘ég'r.ctu\$¢'ffi.kh ‘ r g. ' 4 g I ~ '4‘ ”.44 a". ‘, 3.. 3. .'~ ' - .\ \‘I y ’n 'h' . e . . 'I'e":~-"{,,I .-'.‘('.~.’T,. " ..‘. "nfi If. It"? " - . 5.- .‘ka... "' '.NI,.¢'. '. ‘ '. . “"n' "L" P “ .’ .wm' 3 . a ‘. '1 ‘ ': ".1 2 . ’e“ 'e - " ' ' rs ' ' i - ' r I .I' “e . q . t'v '9‘ '0‘! .‘t "'5 -". ' ‘ t C :"8' Iv‘ . ’ II: .I- I.I“I‘>I_I‘_I‘a;:!’lI;_ It". . .. , ,"t" .' 'hltij' : u‘. H. ‘ ) .v"\" "']‘e ,".". . .-"a";" W ' I . 'u. ‘. . "3,13, l" 7.“. ’, I . ‘l"..l" .‘Ifi '.., . .2 43"}: -. V, 3‘, ’..D- “a . ‘Q‘i ‘I’fLJL‘f' : .55 "q: ...’ '. "- hr); :3. Ir ‘rfi .133 ," “',lf- ‘Tl'v'fi’. ‘.'u’"-v" a‘ -.h‘~;";‘.‘u .9. ' r "3" '3. .,"" -: .an' <; t'.‘ r‘t A ' 3'. .‘ I -“ . . ,.I .‘ J )4: I I h"! .‘.r . r," - 3’ '1)’ . or]; '.I s» :1 ”a? ...: I - . N; - a». .;. we or, I .7 _ v' “'39.. ‘4'“ ‘-..fi 4 “MP“ . '-" - I. 1 \\ on.» ..g '.. S: IK‘IJ.’ *‘I. I I I ‘.- ..- 2w. ,;Lmr—wmvw~. ..'.fi ... - 1.. ~ ‘2‘; ‘,.:a 7. ' -. {'.. 11*“ \"']'f\"‘" 'Y' -;'I .3 c. ~‘..' 3‘”: r' I. L", ., . . - '..,L. - .-. ‘;§,l. "n I. , . .-u . ' «,‘ Ii , I " e .. I I ‘.-N er. ',.: Q“! )(.~"_‘ v.1 I.“ .' 5’ " -e (“I ,n‘ 7"". , J” I—eI,.\/“ .’ ,' e. _. '7‘. 1“.I" ‘o ..'. 'IrV- "_ ' “ 1' ‘ ‘ O“ - :c I r e i l" n ’ .i , ‘ . $1.. .‘I‘ . e It. ‘(fi 3"... ’1' . ...‘ ’2 ‘ -.'- '6 t '. ,.af. I . .1. ",5 . 1 ..I ‘ ' I A. ‘ '.' . t. 'M , ~ -. . A -‘ . 'J-I. I’o ‘ .. . ‘. ".. "_ '(I e e, I s I. I? ’1'“. ' . ...}! f"(‘ 4‘ l.’ ”...'-‘50 ‘5'{"," ‘.f'v "' t,» ‘..: ." ll ‘ J '."L '.V.’ "‘> N. ’ - «4,143.: taper-”.-. 4' . :v- -'... --~. 12.!» f. , f: . .- -1. p '7‘.‘ 5;: ’ it .."‘:—e .‘ '...- -' l.’ -‘.,.. :~r'.¢'iI| '.. t" ‘ ’ . 0‘. ‘e . _ , I ..‘f‘ ‘I . I.“\' I J .' ’1‘. 3.... I . I.. J . .. . ‘ .). | , v . J a t ' , . 2L1 . i V th‘“. '1“, "‘I ...- 1.7. . e" "‘ H-‘f ' '2‘ I ‘- .’ V ." .'.\'t." -. ‘ - I I. ' ‘ " \ 4" . l. ‘e O ”g.'t,§.‘.-,J"r,.j, ' 311‘“. ..'f. | o '1 . ', I . ...‘: Iee‘ ‘- s j. I . . ‘.‘ .- no ' f ' - o.." t" v I “7‘“ . ':.III ...} '. , t ,..v , \e" ‘ ". *1!“ I." ‘I ‘ . v 1' ., \ ‘. a’ “h I . , ,, t .e a . r ¢ . I '1, . , n I' 1‘ ’ .’\\ I . . “ 1 . '7 f. . . i . .‘ $l_ _eI. ‘ ' .f g - . . 1 av e . ’H ’ H“? ’72‘ "('57 J "1' ‘ Y’N‘C" ' ' : ’ ' 1‘ "“1 h - '~’t '-' - 5 ' I ’ ’ '- .- u "‘ 11").3—"7'Kf-LV“?! Wat D‘A‘ ' ..'. . f" ' 1’ ' \72' . .. ' '« J. 'J-' -.~“--‘ 0 rhy" 19.1.1.3 .jf/l‘rb of; ‘ 1‘." ‘1“ '1“ ‘1an. " ,. " e e I ) .93.) 'v'.". o I‘ a.“ '. _ .‘..' ‘ a o. c a t' . "II An' 'I . , -..‘" ‘ ‘ I . ‘ ‘ F, t " 9 g‘ ‘.J“.f,.,‘:;” ti” ,1“ inhis. VII. -VI ' ’ ~.’ ‘I I-\ )1":) . t, ' P ‘ _‘ ' '. e: "' .'.." . P‘ O i I": _ ”{— TEAL-1' .5 _;I_1.vI-t"_ \ .r it“ .I C" .-.'."; . 1 I I‘II ,v u I If. '..}. t I, ‘ olI' :i'g‘n o . .’(..E,,.‘ ‘, 4“, .54.. '... ‘,(' 1 4. !' t ‘..F "‘ \Q -‘ I . I ‘b. . . of ' - ‘ . ea 5 - ' 'v ' ' g _ . " e .u‘ Wylifi'jgwl :’-'¢"vf~.;.~' I‘ ",2"! ‘HU ‘,.-_ A‘ "' _ . .1: . /, _ V l, A {1. . .-‘ .' ‘5 .e‘. o t. .' e lo . - , I.‘ .. .- I',. _‘I- “‘. ~ . - ._ e° .. 'I 1 , , t .011.) d “P" ' 7§I.,,‘ “313‘ - ‘ - I .I tI I I .‘E-,-.' :III.. 0 - ? “'.. ,' ._I . . ‘it (3‘. ~~ ’n'w ramm- w 2: ‘1' '1‘. M '..V'V; ') ‘ .. ,. t '.‘e ‘ ' - ‘ ’f .‘ ....- 1’1! I" 13‘. ,. ', .'- . ,.. ”-I‘ ' .a {‘2 ' .1 To ' ' -' ‘_' ‘ l ,I ‘4', ‘_ ...‘.-5,. [1L L;,;. I‘M 4!, I ,..- ‘1‘, .‘e' V 4 O f. ‘. ‘ .J A - ”J'C'i‘n?"‘7t"- 1.“. - , A .’\- M , ' ~’ , .- , -'..~ ' "' .- 5.4- 3' . hi. I. ,2" - 7- .w, H. , ‘ _' .,' i Weft"? ‘- .. ‘/-'. "I '. VII: ' ' t” . r '. ‘L "e1 ;;,' ' .‘ ‘X .~ T f -’ . ~r’. {'21 ' ‘|.r“"';. -: ' . ., ~{H—J. “‘34. g $ " ‘.. t' ...' ,."tl , ‘, , 5";4 _ ' 1' .' "L ‘ A u 0' '~’ ‘ " ' ' . .' “'.‘. ' ‘ ' "I ' ‘ '. - L viitw‘v,‘ '3'; ,n it n ‘ ..'. .l (I 5 ‘J ' !‘ ff 5 ‘ ' J Q _.I i . “' J o", .1 ' .°,. ‘ . .!J '.I .'. " *‘e- :‘a 1.9". “-‘.—'.‘. s -' ...' '.1 .1: 1' ' ' 'w. 'J .‘ "‘° x ” ' - '... '1 1‘ - '. '- ‘.' ' ‘. ' ._ ,‘r'. ' J - " ". ' ." -‘u '1’. S’P‘.-'.“‘ “1'_""|. #313,. ,f v-I. ' ‘.. . " . ‘:0‘, |9\ .‘ ‘ e ° ‘I . I.‘ I -7“ .I o 1 .- . . - t e.“- and). ' )9 k- ' u . »1 ’ i, \t . I t. ."'.') 1;" 1' ~ ""- - . . . ‘ "’ ' ' fyfilg" " \ k -t"' *‘(u . ,i ‘. 9r" "1 ‘ --!". g .1.‘ “ It "-'. .K. I ‘7"-V . .‘ I ' L“, J . I, ... g' i I”. ..‘Sn:1.'.'r’"l '. 4 b. II . ' [... ..’. _ ‘ ,y .‘ I I I. . l_ . ' a 'v ‘5'; f“ ‘ {n‘ 'N‘U- 'P\ "I :v ‘3 ‘, ‘3’:- e )tu )0, ”I" >' ' tr" 0 V .I ,A. .y: 3.1. 5. .. . . "‘fl- ,Vh"‘ .‘J 5‘! I ". "'V/"I; "v I. .‘. ‘ .'»' " "1v ' -3 H "1"“. «’ - A. ' ’ f r}. - W..." - ' . ~ . .. -. 3 I." ~ I . L .-’. ,.. . ,J“, J, \ I , I ‘ . II A .I "-‘I’.’ t I} .""" “1’ ""4 f‘fl‘f’l' ‘1}‘31” ‘ .r ‘ M 1' 1 ' .9 ‘ ' v-r'} . i ‘J ”t)» t‘ t‘ ' .-:.2 r we ’s'. .'-';-’ “m ,-r ‘ ' - - ~ .- a. [K