OXYGEN DEBT AND CHANGES m OTHER SELECTED VARIABLES [meme AN ‘EX-HAUSTIVE RUN ON A moron - DRWEN TREADMILL Thesis for the Degree of MA MICHIGAN STATE UNWERSITY GERALD MICHAEL NESTER 1970 LIBRARY "~§1(higan 3mg; 1‘H 6813 *. {K ABSTRACT OXYGEN DEBT AND CHANGES IN OTHER SELECTED VARIABLES DURING AN EXHAUSTIVE RUN ON A MOTOR-DRIVEN TREADMILL ' By Gerald Michael Nester Six trained Michigan State University athletes ranging in age from 19 to 21 years ran different random sequences of tests. One ran in each sequence to exhaustion. This was accomplished by running up a 9—degree grade at 10 m.p.h. on a motor—driven treadmill. Oxygen debt accumu- lation as well as heart rate, oxygen uptake, oxygen pulse, and oxygen requirement were studied in order to determine the pattern of progression which results in what is termed exhaustion. The means and standard deviation were used to describe the results. .Two methods of analyses were used. The first method examined only the exhaustive run. The second method used a new technique where by a series of runs which progressively increased in intensity and included the exhaustive run could be examined in what is termed a calculated composite run to exhaustion. The study indicated that heart rate, oxygen uptake, and oxygen pulse are related to the rate and size of the Gerald Michael Nester accumulation of oxygen debt. Both the alactacid and lactacid oxygen debt accumulation may be seen in the rapid early rise in value followed by a slight adjustment in accumulation, and another rapid increase which leveled off near exhaustion. When two subjects who ran the longest period of time and two subjects who ran the shortest period of time were compared with all subjects individual differ- ences were noted. These differences were most apparent during the latter stages of the test sequences. The study indicated that a possible new approach to oxygen debt research has been found with the calculated composite technique. OXYGEN DEBT AND CHANGES IN OTHER SELECTED VARIABLES DURING AN EXHAUSTIVE RUN ONA MOTOR—DRIVEN TREADMILL By Gerald Michael Nester A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of ' MASTER OF ARTS Department of Health, Physical Education and Recreation 1970 DEDICATION To Rosemary, for understanding those things which make a man's life important. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer wishes to acknowledge the guidance and aid given him by the members of the Department of Health, Physical Education and Recreation. Particular appreciation is expressed to Dr. William W. Heusner and Dr. Wayne Van Huss who were of great help throughout the entire study. ‘ln addition, the writer wishes to thank Richard Bell and six subjects who participated in the actual follow- through of the study. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chapter I. INTRODUCTION AND STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM. . Introduction. . . . . . . . . Statement of the Problem. . . . . Limitations of the Study. . . . . Definition of Terms Used. . . . . II. RELATED LITERATURE . . . . . . . . . III. RESEARCH METHODS . . . . . . . . IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION . . . . . . V. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Summary . Conclusions . . . . . . . . . Recommendations. . . . . . . . LITERATURE CITED. . . . . . . . . . . iv Page ii iii viii H :— nJFHAFJ \O Table 1. U. 10. LIST OF TABLES All possible tests for the subject who performed the longest period of time Gas-collection intervals for the stan- dard recovery period . . . . Heart rate per minute value for 5-minute rest . . . . . . . . . . . . . Heart rate per minute value for 5-minute warm-up and lS—minuterecovery. . . Heart rate per minute value for maximum run considering all subjects, the two who ran the longest time, and the two subjects who ran the shortest time based on the per cent of maximum run time Heart rate per minute value for calculated composite run to exhaustion considering all subjects, the two subjects who ran the longest time, and the two subjects who ran the shortest time based on the per cent of maximum run time . . . . . Recovery heart rate per minute value for 10% run, 50% run, and 100% run Oxygen uptake per minute value for 5—minute rest . . . . . . . . . . . . . Oxygen uptake per minute value for 5—minute warm-up and 15-minute recovery . . . Oxygen uptake per minute values in liters for maximum run considering all subjects, the two subjects who ran the longest time, the two subjects who ran the shortest time based on the per cent of maximum run time Page 10 ll 15 15 l6 l6 19 21 21 22 ‘l'ILhJ O I“. 15. 16. 17. 18. Page Oxygen uptake per minute values in liters for calculated composite run to exhaustion considering all subjects, the two subjects who ran the longest time, the two subjects who ran the shortest time based on the per cent of maximum run time . . . 22 Recovery oxygen uptake per minute value in liters for 10% run, 50% run, and 100% run . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Oxygen pulse value for 5-minute rest . . 27 Oxygen pulse value for 5-minute warm- up and 15—minute recovery . . _. . . 27 Oxygen pulse values in ml. for maximum run considering all subjects, the two subjects who ran the longest time, the two subjects who ran the shortest time based on the per cent of maximum run time . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Oxygen pulse values in ml. for calculated composite run to exhaustion considering all subjects the two who ran the longest time, the two subjects who ran the shortest time based on the per cent of maximum run time . . . . . . . . 28 Recovery oxygen pulse value in ml. for 10% run, 50% run, and l00% run . . . . . 31 The mean rate of net oxygen debt accumu- lation for the calculated composite run (oxygen debt in liters per minute divided by the per cent of maximum run) considering all subjects, the two sub— jects who ran the longest time, the two subjects who ran the shortest time . 33 The mean net oxygen debt in liters during the calculated composite run considering all subjects, the two subjects who ran the longest time, the two subjects who ran the shortest time . . . . . . . 33 vi Table 4 Page 20. The mean rate of oxygen requirement in liters per minute during the calcu- lated composite run considering all subjects, the two subjects who ran the longest time, the two subjects who ran the shortest time . . . ’. . . 36 vii LIST OF FIGURES Fixturxe 1. Heart rate per minute value for 5— minute rest, 5—minute warm-up, and 15—minute recovery 2. Heart Rate for maximum run and for calculated composite run 3. Heart rate for maximum run consid- ering means of all subjects, the two subjects who ran the longest and the two subjects who ran the shortest . . . N. Heart rate for calculated composite run considering means of all subjects, the two subjects who ran the longest, and the two subjects who ran the shortest U7 0 Recovery heart rate for 10% run, 50% run, and 100% run . 6. Oxygen uptake per minute values for 5—minute rest, 5-minute warm—up, and 15-minute recovery 7. Oxygen uptake for maximum run and for calculated composite run 8. Oxygen uptake for maximum run considering means of all sub- jects, the two subjects who ran longest, the two subjects who ran shortest 9. Oxygen uptake for calculated composite run considering means of all subjects, the two sub- jects who ran longest, the two subjects who ran shortest viii Page 17 17 18 18 2O I'D L23 23 2A 2A Figures Page 10. Recovery oxygen uptake for 10% run, 50% run, and 100% run . . . . . . . . . . . 26 11. Oxygen pulse value for 5- minute rest, 5-minute warm-up, and 15-minute recovery . . . . . . . . . . . 29 12. Oxygen pulse for maximum run and for calculated composite run . . . . . . . . . 29 13. Oxygen pulse for maximum run considering means of all subjects, the two subjects who ran longest, the two subjects who ran shortest . . . . . 30 1“. Oxygen pulse for calculated composite run considering means of all subjects, the two subjects who ran longest, the two subjects who ran shortest . . . . . . . . 30 15. Recovery oxygen pulse for 10% run, 50% run, and 100% run . . . . . 32 16. Mean rate of net oxygen debt accumulation for calculated composite run in (oxygen debt in liters per minute divided by per cent of maximum run time) considering all subjects, the two subjects who ran longest, the two subjects who ran shortest . . . . . . . . . . 3A 17. Mean net oxygen debt accumulation in liters during calculated composite run . . . . . . . . . 35 18. Oxygen requirement in liters per minute considering means of all subjects, the two subjects who ran longest, the two subjects who ran shortest . . . . . . . . . . 37 ix CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION AND STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM Introduction The accumulation of an oxygen debt allows an indi— vidual to convert stored chemical energy into mechanical energy anaeraobically. This process is well known and is considered to be the basis for an individual to do severe or maximal work [1, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13,]. However, there has been little quantitative evidence which shows the pattern of oxygen debt accumulation during specific intervals of exhaustive exercise and recovery. Statement of the Problem The purpose of this study was to determine the pat- tern of oxygen debt accumulation during an exhaustive run on a motor-driven treadmill by trained individuals. Pro- gressive changes in heart rate, oxygen uptake, and oxygen pulse also were studied. Limitations of the Study Due to considerations of time, laboratory personnel, and available equipment, the subjects were limited to six trained Michigan State University athletes. Only one run sequence per man was used. Therefore, an approach other 1 than a descriptive interpretation of results or trends could not be undertaken. Since the individuals selected for this study were from only two sports, hockey and track, it should be noted that differences in the types of athletic activity under- taken and the resultant differences in the physical and mental conditioning necessary for the particular sports involved may have produced unknown limiting factors. In addition, the attempt to achieve maximal effort was pos— sibly limited by a number of intervening conditions which were impossible to control, even though the individuals were trained varsity athletes [15]. Studies of this nature serve as pilot work for future research. Thus, it is with this intent that the study was designed and the conclusions were drawn. Definition of Terms The following terms were used in this study: Oxygen Debt. "Oxygen debt" is used to denote the amount of oxygen consumption during a recovery period which is in excess of that used at rest and which is nec- essary to reverse the anaerobic reactions of prior exercise. iaximal or Exhaustive Exercise. "Maximal" or "exhaustive" exercise is used to denote a level of exercise at which the cardiovascular and respiratory systems are unable to provide the oxygen necessary for the involved muscles. Anaerobic Reaction. "Anaerobic reaction" is used to denote a metabolic or chemical reaction that can take place without simultaneous sufficient intake of oxygen. Resting Level Value. The “resting level value" is used to denote the mean value of any given variable during a five-minute period of rest on three randomly selected days, on which the subject was not stressed before or after the rest period. Oxygen Cost of Exercise. The "oxygen cost of exercise" is used to denote the sum of the oxygen debt of exercise plus the oxygen intake during the task. Oxygen Pulse. ”Oxygen pulse" is used to denote the amount of oxygen being supplied to the body per heart beat. Oxygen Uptake. "Oxygen uptake" is used to denote the volume of oxygen per minute being utilized by the body from inspired air taking into consideration standard temperature and pressure corrections. CHAPTER II RELATED LITERATURE The purpose of this study was to determine the pattern of oxygen debt accumulation and the pattern of changes in other related variables during a maximal run on a motor- driven treadmill by trained subjects. The results of pre- vious studies dealing with the relationships of oxygen debt and maximal exercise were reviewed. During the performance of severe exercise, a point is quickly reached when the body converts stored chemical energy into mechanical energy. This process is made pos- sible by the accumulation of an oxygen debt [A]. The accumulation of an oxygen debt begins when a point is reached where the circulation of an individual can no longer supply the needed oxygen at a rate which will meet the metabolic requirements of the working muscles [9, 11] and continues until the anaerobic chemical processes within the body have produced concentrations of lactic acid ranging between three and four percent [10]. Hill and his collaborators f7]found that immediately after the cessation of exercise, the individual begins re- paying the oxygen debt. The amount of oxygen debt is best measured by collecting expired air for a set period of time A during the recovery period immediately following the conclusion of exercise [A]. The volume of the expired sample, the percent of each gas present in the sample, and the amount of oxygen used in excess of the resting requirement are the factors which are used to calculate the actual amount of oxygen debt. Taylor [9] and Dill [3] pointed out that the trained athlete is capable of producing a much larger oxygen debt than the untrained person. Karpovich [10] reported that: In the severest forms of exercise something over 22 liters of oxygen may be required to provide the energy used in one minute. This is an impossible accimplishment for the respiratory and circulatory systems, which even in a well-developed athlete may supply only between A and 5 liters in a minute. By contracting an oxygen debt of 18 to 19 liters, the demand for 22 liters a minute can be met. The lar- gest oxygen debt reported was 22.8 liters, after a 10,000—meter race. Prior to 192A, it was generally believed that a quan- titative relationship between oxygen debt and lactic acid production acted as a check for normal physiological recov— ery after severe exercise [7, 10]. Margaria and others [12], however, have stated that this is only partially correct. They pointed out that payment of oxygen debt involves two distinct factors: first, an initial period of recovery during which there is a rapid fall in oxygen intake after the cessation of exercise, and second, the prolcnged remainder of recovery occurring after extended or maximal exertion. Margaria and his associates [l2] and as well as others [1, 2, 3, A, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 15] labeled the two components of recovery as an alactacid oxygen debt and a lactacid oxygen debt. The first phase of recovery, or the period of the alactacid oxygen debt, is the rapid component which is due to the oxidative removal of lactic acid in the working muscles. In other words, the alactacid oxygen debt is an expression of an oxidative process in which the energy liberated is spent in repaying the amount of energy set free anaerobiacally during exercise. Huckabee [8] points out that during this time, oxygen debt is a linear function of oxygen intake because of the oxida- tion of substances (Pyruvate + DPNH : Lactate = DPN) furnishing energy for the resynthesis of the phosphagen split during muscular contraction. The phosgene split is also the contributing factor which causes the actual amount of alactacid oxygen debt to be proportional to the extra amount of oxygen consumption per minute in exercise. Robinson and his collaborators [13] found the oxygen cost of the first minute of severe exercise to be higher than that for the second minute, but on running to exhaustion, the oxygen requirement increased to a value fifty per cent greater than that in the first minute of the run or exercise. The second phase of the recovery period, or the lactacid oxygen debt, is the slow component which involves the removal of lactic acid from the blood. According to Margaria and his associates [12] this phase is not appreciable until the oxygen intake is equal to or greater than 2.5 lite*s per minute. It increases slowly at first and then increases rapidly until the curve becomes vertical at a point which corresponds to the maximum metabolic rate. According to Hill [7], the concentration of lactic acid, on the other hand, behaves as a linear function of the extra oxygen consumption_per time interval of recovery which is dependent on the sum of: (a) the basal oxygen consumption, (b) the oxygen consumption attributed to oxidation of lactic acid, (0) another exponential function of time occurring at a fast rate, and (d) the oxygen con- sumption decreasing very slowly during recovery. It is during the lactacid oxygen debt payment that there is an increase in the resynthesis of glycogen from the lactic acid. The subsequent payment of the lactacid debt follows the same rate as the lactacid removal, each process is a logarithmic function of time [15]. The concentration of lactic acid in an individual's blood during the recovery period was at one time considered to he an indication of the total oxygen debt, and the removal of lactic acid was assumed to be the rate of payment indicator [10]. Huckabee [8], however, noted that the respiratory-cardiovascular lag in lactacid Ixygen debt payment was not attributed primarily to the lactate mechanism. Therefore, there appears to be no reliable metabolic explanation for the slow phase of oxygen debt payment. Karpovich [10] also has noted that it does not appear that energy for resynthesis of substances which were broken down during severe exercise has anything to do with real oxygen debt. Regardless of the mechanisms involved in oxygen debt payment, both the total oxygen debt and the lactacid debt are related to the intensity and duration of work. It follows then that the alactacid debt is also dependent upon the intensity and duration of work. In other words, the lactacid oxygen debt and alactacid oxygen debt in severe activity are contracted concurrently [l2]. CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODS The purpose of this study was to describe the pattern of oxygen debt accumulation and changes in related variables during an exhaustive run on a motor-driven treadmill at 10 m.p.h. up a 9-degree grade by trained athletes. Experimental_pesign Six trained Michigan State University varsity athletes ranging from 19 to 21 years of age were choosen for the study from a group of twelve volunteers. The men were selected so that scheduling could be maintained at given intervals during the morning hours from 7 a.m. to 12 noon without conflict. Four of the subjects were distance runners and two men were hockey defensemen. For a period of one week prior to the actual data collection, the subjects ran a 5-minute warm-up run at 5 miles per hour on a zero-degree grade, rested 15 minutes and ran for 1 minute up the 9-degree grade at 10 miles per hour with a 15-minute recovery period following The week permitted the subjects to become familiar with both 9 10 running on the treadmill and the necessary collection equipment which was used. The first actual run was an exhaustive effort. This enabled the laboratory personnel to determine the approximate maximum running time for each subject. Two 15-second intervals were added to each subject's initial run time in order to allow for factors which could permit the runners later to surpass their first exhaustive efforts. Table 3.1 illustrates all possible tests for the subject who performed for the longest period of time. The other subjects had similar, but fewer test runs since their times to reach exhaustion were shorter. Each subject's run sequence was randomized so that the mean effects of training were as negligible as possible. TABLE 3.1-—All possible tests for the subject who performed the longest period of time. 1. 5-minute warm-up with recovery period 2. 5-minute warm-up with recovery period 3. 5-minute warm-up with recovery period A. 5-minute rest period 5. 5-minute rest period 6. 5-minute rest period 7. lS-second run with recovery period 8. 30—second run with recovery period 9. AS-second run with recovery period 10. l—minute run with recovery period 11. l—minute 15-second run with recovery period 12. l-minute 30-second run with recovery period 13. l-minute US—second run with recovery period 1A. 2-minute run with recovery period 15. 2—minute lS-second run with recovery period 16. 2-minute 30-second run with recovery period 17. 2—minute A5-second run with recovery period 18. 3—minute run with recovery period 11 Table 3.2 shows the gas collection periods during each of the 15~minute standard recovery periods. TABLE 3.2—-Gas-collection intervals for the standard recovery period 1. Ten 15-second intervals . . . 2 1/2 minutes 2. Five 30—second intervals . . 2 1/2 minutes 3. One lO-minute interval . . . 10 minutes : 15 minutes Each subject ran a 5-minute warm—up and then rested for 15 minutes before each test except the six special periods which involved only the warm-up runs and the rest periods. The subjects were not told which run they would do until just before the warm-up. It was hoped that this would cause the individuals to be prepared for a maximum effort each day. , Collection of expired air was accomplished by the use of a Triple-J respiratory valve into which the runners breathed. The valve was connected to a series of Douglas bags which were changed during inspiration after each gas collection interval. The air collected in each of the Douglas bags was analized for percent of oxygen and carbon dioxide using Beckman Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide analyzers. After the analysis, the remaining air was evacuated by means of a Kofranyi Volume Meter and appropriate corrections were 12 made for temperature, pressure, and the volumes of gas extracted by the oxygen and carbon dioxide analyzers. Standard exercise electrodes and leads were placed on the subject and connected to a Sanborn Polygraph outlet to record the subject's heart rate. The heart rate was recorded during the entire run and for selected intervals during the standard recovery period. These recovery intervals were the first 5 1/2 minutes, 6 minutes 30 seconds to 7 minutes, 8 minutes 30 seconds to 9 minutes, 10 minutes 30 seconds to 11 minutes, 12 minutes 30 seconds to 13 minutes, and IA minutes 30 seconds to 15 minutes. As mentioned previosuly, only a descriptive inter— pretation of results or trends can be considered; therefore, means and standard deviations were used for heart rate, oxygen uptake, oxygen pulse, oxygen debt and oxygen require- ment. The rate of oxygen debt accumulation for each run was found by dividing the recovery oxygen uptake for each run by the length of that run in minutes. Further analyses of the oxygen debt data as well as the data on heart rate, oxygen uptake, oxygen pulse, and oxygen requirement were accomplished by using the maximum time of the exhaustive run of each subject as his 100 percent base effort and finding 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90 percent levels of the maximum run time. The mean values for the two subjects who ran the longest and shortest periods of time also were found. 13 In addition to the analyses of the maximum run, a cal— culated composite run was found by using 10 through 90 per- cent levels of maximum run time for the selected varibles. This was accomplished by using the maximal run as the 100 percent base and calculating the given percent levels from the series of test runs which were partitioned into 15- second intervals. This technique enabled the mean and standard deviation values to be studied as subjects were progressively tested during their entire sequence of runs leading to exhaustion. Again, the means were calculated for the two subjects who ran the longest and shortest periods of time in addition to the mean and standard devia- tion values for all subjects. CHAPTER IV RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The purpose of the study was to determine the pattern of oxygen debt accumulation in trained varsity athletes during an exhaustive maximal run on a motor—driven treadmill at 10 m.p.h. up a 9 degree grade. Progressive changes in heart rate, oxygen uptake, and oxygen pulse also were studied. Each of six subjects performed a different random sequence of selected tests shown in table 3.1. Results The group means and standard deviations, along with the mean values of the two subjects who ran the longest period of time and the mean values of the two subjects who ran the shortest period of time, are presented for the maximal run and the calculated composite run in graphical and tabular form. The results of the heart rate data are found on pages 15-21, oxygen uptake on pages 22—28, oxygen pulse on pages 29-35, oxygen debt on pages 36-A1, and oxygen requirement on pages A2—A3. The discussion follows the tables and graphs. 1A TABLE A.l——Heart rate per minute value for 5-minute rest. Time Mean Standard Deviation 1'00" 65.1 10.6 2'00" 63.2 10.2 3'00" 63.5 9.3 A'oo" 6A.5 8.u 5'00" 6A.5 9-1 TABLE U.2-—Heart rate per minute value for 5—minute warm— up and 15—minute recovery. Time Mean Standard Deviation 1'00" 125.3 13.7 2'00" 136.2 1A.2 3'00" 137.5 16.3 A'OO" 138.A 12.A 5'00" 139.9 13.7 15” 123.A 22.1 30" 107.1 18.2 A5" 91.1 1A.6 1'00” 87.1 13.7 1'15" 85.3 13.0 1'30" 8A.5 13.2 1'A5" 83.9 15.6 2'00" 82.0 12.8 2'30” 79.0 13.7 3'00" 81.5 11.7 3'31" 80.0 12.A “'00“ 78.0 11.2 “'30" 77.3 9.7 5'00" 75.7 9.6 5'30" 78.8 11.6 6'30" 77.3 13.3 8'30" 7A.l 9.1 10'30" 7A.l 11.8 12'30" 72.9 9-0 1A'30" 73.2 9.7 16 TAth A.3--Heart rate per minute value for maximum run considering all subjects, the two subjects who ran the longest time, and the two subjects who ran the shortest time based on the per cent of maximum run time. Per Means Standard Means for the Means for the ant for All Deviation two Subjects Who two Subjects Who ‘L Subjects Ran Longest Ran Shortest 10 110.2 29.0 1A1.2 80.3 2 1A6.6 16.A 162.0 13A.7 30 159.5 1A.8 168.5 15A.0 A0 16A.8 13.9 171.6 16A.7 50 169.5 11.6 17A.0 171.6 60 176.0 A.1 177.7 175.9 70 176.3 3.2 176.1 177.1 80 182.5 A.5 180.A 188.2 90 186.7 7.0 185.5 193.0 100 18A.8 A.9 181.7 190.7 TABLE A.A--Heart rate per minute value for calculated composite run to exhaustion considering all subjects, the two subjects who ran the longest time, and the two subjects who ran the shortest time based on the per cent of maximum run time. Per Means Standard Means for the Means for the tent for All Deviation two Subjects Who two Subjects Who ”" ’ Subjects Ran Longest Ran Shortest 10 103.2 22.2 119.6 80.A 20 1A6.5 16.9 1A7.A 132.8 30 157.0 6.5 157.2 153.3 A0 170.6 6.2 168.8 168.1 50 173.1 6.6 176.2 176.0 60 175.7 A.3 172.3 178.A 70 178.8 6.1 176.8 180.0 80 176.8 3.3 176.0 180.0 90 18A.9 11.1 179.7 185.8 100 18u.8 A.9 181.7 190.7 17 U 190< Rest Warm-up Recovery 1704f 1504 V T 130-1 110 «>- Heart Rate (beats/minute) \O O .4 O n j W U1 0 AL #— A 1 l l l l l 1' '1 2 3 A 5 l 2 3 A 5 10 15 Time-Minutes A J J j.._ T 0 l 2 w- 1 5 w" :1? Figure A.l.—-Heart rate per minute value for 5 minute rest, 5 minute warm-up and 15 minute recovery. 190'[ 4-- 1701+ 150‘? 13m- ———— Heart rate composite 110‘ ———— Heart rate maximum Heart Rate (beats/minute) n J 4 A l L l_ .1 1 ‘ T V ‘r 0 10 2O 30 A0 50 60 7D ED 90 100 Per Cent of Maximum Run Time Figure A.2.—-Heart rate for maximum run and for calculated composite run. Heart Rate (beats/minute) Heart Rate (beats/minute) l8 190T 170+ 150-1- 130-1:- 110? x /' Means of all subjects / --— Means of 2 subjects who ran 90* . longest // —-"—-Means of 2 subjects who ran ' shortest 70 50 1 1 1 4 L 1 1 4 L A 10 2O 30 A0 50 6O 70 80 90 100 Per Cent of Maximum Run Time Figure A.3.--Heart rate for maximum run considering means of all subjects, the 2 subjects who ran the longest, the 2 subjects who ran the shortest. 190" 170" 150*” 130" 1101 Means of all subjects --- Means of 2 subjects who ran 901 longest ——--—-Means of 2 subjects who ran shortest A l V I v 10 20 30 A0 60 60 f0 80 50 160 Per Cent of Maximum Run Time Figure A.A.—-Heart rate for calculated composite run considering means of all subjects, the 2 subjects who ran the longest, the 2 subjects who ran the shortest. 10 TAHLH “.H——Hvuuvvry heart rate per minute value for 10% run, 50% run, and 100% run. Time “ean Standard Time Mean Standard Deviation Deviation 10% Run 15” 116.6 27.0 3'30" 60.9 5.0 30” 109.8 16.0 “'00" 63.0 8.1 “5" 08.2 12.1 “'30" 59.0 6.0 1'00" 7“.5 11.2 5'00" 62.0 9.0 1'15” 66.8 6.0 5'30" 65.6 8.6 1'30" 65.6 +5.7 6'30" 65.2 10.2 1'“5“ 61.6 “.6 8'30" 6“.“ 5.6 2'00" 59.“ 8.1 10'30" 60.1 6.1 2'30" 60.8 6.5 12'30" 61.8 3.1 3'00" 59.6 8.1 1“'30" 60.7 “.7 50% Run 15" 170.5 8.0 3'30" 91.5 l“.3 30" 165.0 12.“ “'00" 90.3 12.7 “5" 1“0.8 15.6 “'30" 88.5 11.6 1'00" 127.2 16.3 5'00" 90.0 8.“ 1'15" 118.5 17.1 5'30" 85.5 8.7 1'30" 109.5 15.1 6'30" 88.8 16.3 1'“5" 105.2 15.0 8'30" 85.“ 11.“ 2'00” 100.“ 21.0 10'30" 8“.8 3.9 2'30” 96.5 18.7 12'30" 86.7 3.3 3'00" 93.“ 15.7 1“'30" 83.0 5.1 100% Run 15" 183.3 “.8 3'30" 113.2 13.3 30" 17“.0 16.2 “'00" 109.6 15.8 “5" 167.6 8.3 “'30" 106.6 18.5 1'00" 155.3 10.9 5'00" 109.8 15.5 1'15" 1“8.6 12.6 5'30" 108.9 17.6 1'30" 1“1.2 20.“ 6'30" 109.0 1“.1 1'“5" 136.1 16.3 8'30" 112.1 1“.1 2'00” 131.1 16.9 10'30” 107.“ 12.7 2'30" 119.3 15.1 12'30" 106.2 8.7 3'00" ‘117.0 13.“ 1“'30" 107.3 11.9 2O .czp Road 6cm .csn Rom «can goa hog mama pmmmn zhm>oommll.m.z mpswfim mmpSCHzImEHB m m a m m a omi . omfi . omme. 0mm 0mm 0mm omiomm omi omm_omm_ omjom o . q q d d - a . . . . u 4 q a u a . qu .rom AvON. I‘OIOIO'O .1100 I; .III. “C! o x I I'lol \IIIIII.IIII.\. / ” lion—”H ’01! A /lc a ..OMH . . can mooa II I ll )1 M :omH can Rom IIIIIII u 0 55 a3 Ill (.0: so? (eqnuIm/sqeeq) eqea qaeeH “THHJG ”.h——UXNVHWILHHJHN3 per nflxuflx: value IEn1€f4ninute rest. Time Mean Standard Deviation 1'00” 0.367 0.135 2'00" 0.367 0.097 3'00" 0.309 0.0“6 “'00" 0.311 0.035 5'00" 0.305 0.0“3 TABLE “.7-—Oxygen uptake per minute value for 5—minute warm-up and lS-minute recovery. Time Mean Standard Deviation 1'00" 1.310 0.51“ 2'00" 1.70“ 0.577 3'00" 1.985 0.“67 “'00" 2.09“ 0.613 5'00" 1.821 0.7“8 15" 1.510 0.668 30" 1.288 0.6“? “5" 1.178 0.697 1'00" 0.961 0.625 1'15" 0.67“ 0.597 1'30" 0.358 0.1“? 1'“5" 0.“0“ 0.208 2'00" 0.“76 0.505 2'30” 0.328 0.129 3'00" 0.“““ 0.““0 3'30" 0.327 0.150 “'00" 0.“05 0.272 “'30" 0.26“ 0.1“6 5'00" 0.273 0.12“ 10'00" 0.255 0.113 22 TAHLH “.8—-0xygen uptake per minute values in liters for maximum run considering all subjects, the two subjects who ran the longest time, the two subjects who ran the shortest time based on the per cent of maximum run time. Fer Means Standard Means for the Means for the Cent for All Deviation two Subjects Who two Subjects Who ’ Subjects Ran Longest Ran Shortest 10 1.101 0.502 1.285 0.816 20 1.068 0.822 2.“05 1.62“ 30 3.022 0.796 3.590 2.130 “0 3.5“1 0.550 3.880 3.113 50 3.911 0.350 3.970 3.693 60 “.279 0.216 “.295 “ 212 70 “.“2“ 0.1“1 “.565 “.3“8 80 “.195 0.218 “.235 “.103 90 “.263 0.289 “.390 “.119 100 “.272 0.397 “.090 “.3“3 TABLE “.9--Oxygen uptake per minute values in liters for calculated composite run to exhaustion considering all subjects, the two subjects who ran the longest time, the two subjects who ran the shortest time based on the per cent of maximum run time. m~_ m-— .————.- .‘.-_ *. __.—_———_. Tel Means Standard Means for the Means for the Cent for All Deviation two Subjects Who two Subjects Who Subjects Ran Longest Ran Shortest 10 0.98“ 0.202 1.105 1.053 20 1.88“ 0.581 2.095 1.389 30 2.236 1.198 2.283 2.072 “0 2.839 1.113 2.697 2.865 50 3.188 0.72“ 3.“12 3.228 60 3.8“6 0.6“6 “.293 3.916 70 “.111 0.297 “.26“ “.335 80 3.7“2 0.7““ “.278 3.36“ 90 3.6“2 0.552 3.119 “.029 100 “.271 0.397 “.090 “.3“1 23 7.3 .p 3 E '270T ‘3 Rest Warm—up Recovery 3 .220. .p H .4 " .1703— (D .3 :3 Q .120-- :2) 8 ho 0700*“ 32 O \_._.——1 0200‘7' r ‘fess‘? 1+1? ‘fits‘f:+£‘r#+:::;% 0 l 2 3 “ 5 l 2 3 “ 5 l 2 3 “ 5 10 15 Time-Minutes Figure “.6.-—Oxygen uptake per minute values for 5 minute rest, 5 minute warm-up, and 15 minute recovery. 5.200« “.200+~ /"d“ 3.200« 2.200« ___ Oxygen uptake composite —-- Oxygen uptake maximum Oxygen Uptake (Liters/Minute) L_. l_ L J j V I 0 10 20 30 “0 50 60 70 80 90 100 Per Cent of Maximum Run Time Figure “.7.—-Oxygen uptake for maximum run and for calculated composite run. 2“ 5.200“ “.200« 'g£?:~~-__--~. “ 3.200“ 2.200" / Means of all subjects ’ Means of 2 subjects who ---- ran longest ——~—— Means of 2 subjects who ran shortest 1.200“ Oxygen Uptake (Liters/Minute) J l *7 0 10 20 30 “0 50 60 70 80 90 100 Per Cent of Maximum Run Time ‘7 Figure “.8.--Oxygen tptake for maximum run considering means of all subjects, the 2 subjects who ran longest, the 2 subjects who ran shortest. 50200" “.200< T Means of all subjects Means of 2 subjects who ’ran longest .——-—_Means of 2 subjects who ran shortest Oxygen Uptake (Liters/Minute) LA) N O f? L l I A T U 1 fi 0 10 20 30 “0 50 60 70 80 90 100 Per Cent of Maximum Run Time Figure “.9.-—Oxygen uptake for calculated composite run considering means of all subjects, the 2 subjects who ran longest, the 2 subjects who ran shortest. .25 TABLE “.10-—Recovery oxygen uptake per minute value in liters for 10% run, 50% run, and 100% run. —— —— hecovery H " Standard Recovery 7 0 Standard H., .eans . . ,. Means . ,. lime DeV1ation Time DeV1at10n 10% Run 15" 1.107 0.333 2'30" 0.366 0.137 30" 1.286 0.338 3'00" 0.290 0.1““ “5" 1.117 0.091 3'30" 0.209 0.072 1'00" 0.826 0.320 “'00" 0.199 0.072 1'15" 0.608 0.177 “'30" 0.218 0.059 1'30" 0.51“ 0.11“ 5'00" 0.2“5 0.070 l'“5" 0.361 0.119 10'00" 0.207 0.07“ 2'00" 0.273 0.131 50% Run 15" 3.370 0.7“8 2'30" 0.656 0.250 30" 3.096 0.96“ 3'00” 0.623 0.258 “5” 2.262 0.561 3'30" 0.6“0 0.122 l'0(" 1.511 0.600 “'00" 0.6“8 0.11“ 1'15" 1.113 0.321 “'30" 0.559 0.151 1'30" 1.289 0.51“ 5'00" 0.539 0.057 1'“5" 1.215 0.531 10'00" 0.2“0 0.036 2'00" 0.65“ 0.260 100% Run 15" 3.“00 0.627 2'30" 1.08“ 0.221 30” 3.026 0.“09 3'00" 1.007 0.13“ “5" 2.556 0.193 3'30" 0.792 0.117 1'00" 1.756 0.28“ “'00" 0.7“5 0.171 1'15" 1.812 0.9“5 “'30" 0.796 0.073 1'30" 1.080 0.“56 5'00" 0.788 0.107 1'“5" 1.0“7 0.275 10'00" 0.“95 0.100 2'00” 0.865 0.320 .csp good cam .CSQ aom .czh gofi how mxmpas cowmxo mhm>oommll.oa.: mhswam mmpzcfizlmefie w m z m m H 26 omsa r omwa . omoa 0mm 0mm om» owe—omm_omzpomm_omm_oma_om o . . . - 1 1+. . . . . 1 . . . . . .11 . . . L HHHWUV-IHHHHHHHHhHHhHW-IIIIHJ +15m. .1 com; x.“ 1. oom.m . esp good ....... ”J- oom.m com Rom II-|| can Rea IIIII - oom.: 4 oom.m (eqnutw/saeitq) exeqdn ueBKxo 27 TABLE “.1l——Oxygen pulse value for 5-minute rest Time Means Standard Deviation* 1'00" 0.006 7'00" 0.005 8'00” 0.005 “'00" 0.005 5'00" 0.005 *Standard deviation was not calculated for oxygen pulse. The means of the resting level, warm-up and 15—minute recovery for heart rate and oxygen uptake were used. TABLE “.12——Oxygen pulse value for 5-minute warm-up and lS-minute recovery. Time Means Standard Deviation* 1'00" 0.011 2'00" 0.013 2'00" 0.01 8'00" 0.015 5'00" 0.013 15" 0.011 '0" 0.010 35" 0.011 1'00" 0.011 1'15" 0.008 . '30” 0.00“ 8'“5" 0.005 2'00" 0.006 2'30" 0.00“ 3'00" 0.006 3'30" 0.00“ “'00" 0.005 “'30" 0.003 5'00" 0.00“ 10'00" 0.003 *Standard deviation was not calculated for oxygen pulse. The means of the resting level, warm-up and lS-minute recovery for heart rate and oxygen uptake were used. 28 TAHLH “.13——Oxygen pulse values in ml. for maximum run considering all subjects, the two subjects who ran the longest time, the two subjects who ran the shortest time based on the per cent of maximum run time. Per Means Standard Means for the Means for the Cent for All Deviation two Subjects who two Subjects Subjects Ran Longest Ran Shortest 10 0.0129 0.0035 0.0092 0.0129 20 0.0176 0.00“l 0.01“8 0.0155 3 0.0221 0.0037 0.021“ 0.0191 “0 0.02“1 0.0029 0.0226 0.0229 50 0.02“9 0.0026 0.0228 0.0250 60 0. 255 0.0010 0.02“2 0.0260 70 0.0250 0.0011 0.0260 0.02“7 80 0.0231 0.0009 0.0235 0.0227 90 0.02“0 0.0015 0.0237 0.0229 100 0.0231 0.0022 0.0225 0.0228 TABLE “.“——Oxygen pulse values in ml. for calculated composite run to exhaustion considering all subjects the two who ran the longest time, the two subjects who ran the shortest time based on the per cent of maximum run time Per Means Standard Means for the Means for the Cent for All Deviation two Subjects Who two Subjects Who Subjects Ran Longest Ran Shortest 10 0.0090 0.0028 0.0092 0.0117 20 0.0126 0.007“ 0.0073 0.0155 30 0.0161 0.0075 0.01“5 0.0222 “0 0.019“ 0.0066 0.0162 0.023“ 50 0.0210 0.00“2 0.019“ 0.023“ 60 0.0238 0.0018 0.02“9 0.023“ 70 0.0213 0.00“1 0.02“l 0.01“2 80 0.0191 0.0033 0.0227 0.0178 90 0.0203 0.0039 0.173 0.0227 1(10 0.0189 0.0083 0.0225 0.0197 Oxygen Pulse (ml/beat) 29 .0274- Rest Warm-up Recovery .022 "" .0173» .0121L 0007 " \\h_fi_h_ .002 - 7* *5 <> 0 1 2 3 u 5 1 2 3 “ 5'1 2 3 “ 5 10 15 Time-Minutes Figure “.ll.—-0xygen pulse value for 5 minute rest, 5 minute warm-up, and 15 minute recovery. Oxygen Pulse (ml/beat) .0271 .022“ .0170 .012<- Oxygen Pulse Composite _.._—Oxygen Pulse Maximum 0007 ‘- .0020 Li A V 1 10 20 30 “0 50 60 70 80 90 100 Per Cent of Maximum Run Time I r A A I ' Figure “.12.-—Oxygen pulse for maximum run and for calculated composite run. Oxygen Pulse (ml) 30 .027~ .022. 017 .0124- /’ ————— Means of all subjects / Ix ——-—- Means of 2 subjects who ran 007‘ ’ longest ' ’_"' Means of 2 subjects who ran ‘ shortest .002 Ill- i A _. A ‘ l' T V 10 20 30 “0 50 60 70 80 90 100 Per Cent of Maximum Run Time Figure “.13.--Oxygen pulse for maximum run considering means of all subjects, the 2 subjects who ran longest, the 2 subjects who ran shortest. Oxygen Pulse (m1) .0271 O 022 "" .017" O 012 0 .007« 7" ————_ Means of all subjects ._____ Means of 2 subjects who ran 002 longest ° ” ‘_—'—" Means of 2 subjects who ran 57 shortest 10 20 30 “0 50 60 70 80 90 100 Per Cent of Maximum Run Time Figure “.1“.-—Oxygen pulse for calculated composite run considering means of all subjects, the 2 subjects who ran longest, the 2 subjects who ran shortest. TABLE “.15-—Recovery oxygen pulse value in ml. for 10% run, 50% run, and 100% run. Time Means Standard Time Means Standard Deviation Deviation 10% Run 15" 0.009“ 0.00“2 2'30" 0.0055 0.0019 30" 0.0116 0.0023 3'00" 0.00“5 0.001“ “5" 0.0113 0.0012 3'30" 0.0033 0.0009 1'00" 0.0115 0.0029 “'00” 0.0029 0.0008 1'15" 0.0091 0.0022 “'30" 0.0035 0.0009 1'30” 0.0072 0.002“ 5'00" 0.003“ 0.0010 l'“5" 0.0057 0.0022 10'00" 0.007“ 0.0085 2'00" 0.00“7 0.0027 50% Run 15" 0.0193 0.0038 2'30" 0.0076 0.0031 30" 0.0157 0.00““ 3'00" 0.0069 0.0028 “5” 0.01“7 0.0030 3'30" 0.0071 0.0011 1'00" 0.0116 0.005“ “'00" 0.0078 0.0006 1'15" 0.0129 0.0076 “'30" 0.0065 0.0006 1'30" 0.0166 0.0078 5'00" 0.0053 0.0013 1'“5" 0.0132 0.0068 10'00" 0.0097 0.0095 2'00" 0.0068 0.0037 100% Run 15" 0.0179 0.0030 2'30" 0.009“ 0.0016 30” 0.0168 0.0020 3'00" 0.0079 0.0008 “5" 0.01“2 0.0022 3'30” 0.0069 0.0013 1'00” 0.0113 0.0015 “'00" 0.0073 0.0018 1'15”. 0.0117 0.0062 “'30" 0.0078 0.0011 1'30" 0.0071 0.0029 5'00" 0.0062 0.0016 1'“5" 0.0073 0.0022 10'00" 0.0068 0.0033 2'00" 0.0073 0.0027 32 .css sooa pom .css Rom .CSh Rea pom mmazq smmmxo msm>oommll.ma.: mszwfim mopscflzlmafie m z m H s m omsfi omwu omsfl oma 0mm ems ems—omm_om:_omm_omm_OMH_om o D b 1 q AHmoo. .soo. :NHo. .wao. Eda Roofi lli.l .1mmo. cum xom ..... GSA Rea Illll. ..wmo. (7m) estng ueBKxo 33 TABLB “.16—-iHu3mean rate of net oxygen debt accumulation for the calculated composite run (oxygen debt in liters per minute divided by the per cent of maximum run) considering all subjects, the two subjects who ran the longest time, the two subjects who ran the shortest time. Per Means of Means of the Means of the two Cent All Subjects Subjects Who Subjects Who ' Ran Longest Ran Shortest 10 5.300 6.180 “.000 20 12.“65 15.680 13.530 30. 8.630 10.570 9.953 “0 9.620 10.972 11.305 50 6.272 6.112 7.88“ 60. 8.571 10.uu1 8.826 70 7.8“7 8.“91 9.605 80 7.862 8.621 8.117 90 6.98“ 6.885 7.063 100 5.813 5.83“ 5.327 TABLB “.17--The mean net oxygen debt in liters during the calculated composite run considering all subjects, the two subjects who ran the longest time, the two subjects who ran the shortest time. Per Means of Means of the Means of the two Cent All Subject" Subjects Who Subjects Who ‘ Q Ran Longest Ran Shortest 10 0.895 1.“91 0.826 20 3.006 3.262 3.266 30 3.397 3.293 3.588 “0 “.627 “.316 5.100 50 5.002 5.057 5.185 60 6.928 6.166 5.938 70 7.276 6.753 6.082 80 7.196 7.100 6.606 90 7.208 7.6“6 6.6“2 100 7.197 7.835 6.670 3“ F, n n a a ufl/Vuz///M“V//A////7 r r Ea“;__u______L_a__9_fidi___u_____1~ F. O O h h , w w HULL “wit «VWJ # WVmeW W wumvmv w w w v. S S . 7 t t n C S C e t e 1///0////S(//////fl/MVWWWW mw MW mw _ wu__.re___ __“u_ _____»1~_“d_m___iuui_d u .3 ut St .0 SS 8 u e v/ /,/../ /,,/ / /,1/ / A.l/./.AJ/ / /T/ /./ A2 we 3 n2m _____ ~___711_L__ L____ _____Lire____ r___~g _____ son 11 200 _ huo 1. huh T1 A Ts 721/6V/;C//////C////A) ~4a______r:aga_.:__~:__H__:L— 7//////////////1/////////// — _:HHHHfi_H_fijfl4H:H__4_FH:_a____:~_:___:__fi mr./rx/./.// /../ /.1/./.Au./ /.Ar./,/.A/./ xy/xlfl I _ euil_____mreu_u._ecLufl___q_uw~_i__ _L____ _____~L.7 nv./,/.//./ / Aw,k / /,//./ / xrlw /,1/ A../ /.//l/LV,/..v./A/,/r/.// _ _xgu_u _L___.__euuu _LHH_ _maads;.m____ swag; _~_u.1sa__ _____{_~Hu_ a_uqu 1/,1/ /.//1/ mruv _L_LL_ ALH_SLF_LH__L_____ r i x 1 +1. 1 1 i x v _x s x L . s 6 5 .U. 3 2 l 0 9 8 7 6 5 U. 3 2 l 0 l l l l l l l AmEHB 25m ESEmez Mo pcmo nmg\mpscfifi\mmmpfiav coapmHssdoo< poem cowzxo p02 30 “0 50 60 70 80 90 100 Per Cent of Maximum Run Time 20 10 Figure “.16.-—Mean rate of net oxygen debt accumulation for calculated composite run in (Oxygen debt in liters per minute divided by per cent of maximum run time) considering all subjects, the 2 subjects who ran longest, the 2 subjects who ran shortest. 35 8.0001 7.000-- T 6.000~ 50000 ‘ I I “.000* Liters Mean all subjects —-—-—Mean for 2 longest ———-—Mean for 2 shortest I 3.000' I 2.000‘ “0 50 6O 70 80 90 100 Per Cent of Maximum Run Time 10 20 30 Figure “.17.--Mean net oxygen debt accumulation in liters during calculated composite run. 36 TABLE “.18—-Thv mean rate of oxygen requirement in liters per minute during the calculated composite run considering all subjects, the two subjects who ran the longest time, the two subjects who ran the shortest time. Means of the Two Means of the Two Per Ifieans of‘ O . _‘ . .., . n . 3 0 Subjects Who Ran Subjects Who Ran tent All uUbJeCtu Longest Shortest 10 0.98“ 1.123 1.053 20 “.377 5.231 “.095 30 “.825 5.“5“ 5.058 “0 6.687 7.086 7.387 50 6.32“ 6.“68 7.170 60 8.989 10.558 9.212 70 9.60“ 10.208 11.059 80 10.032 11.175 9.858 90 9.928 9.316 10.386 100 10.08“ ‘ 9.92“ 9.668 37 Means all subjects // Means of 2 subjects who "ran longest ———-—Means of 2 subjects who ran shortest ll.000~~ 10.000*- ’3 9.0001~ 4.) 2 E? 8.000-~ \ U) 8 7 000.- p . ..—{ v-J 6.000~- .1.) 5:: 8 a 5.0001- "-1 3 31:) “.000 -- c 8 7 m 3.000 - N O 2.000 ‘- 1.000-- 0 10 20 30 “0 50 60 70 80 90 100 Per Cent of Maximum Run Time Figure “.18.—-Oxygen requirement in liters per minute considering means fo all subjects, the 2 subjects who ran longest, the 2 subjects who ran shortest. 38 Discussion The results presented in Figure “.2 and Table “.5 indicate that the mean heart rate values increased rapidly for 30 percent of the maximum run and for “0 percent of the calculated composite run and slowly continued to increase to values of l8“.8 beats per minute as the runners became exhausted. The heart rate did not reach an absolute steady state, but continued a slow upward drift with several minor fluctuations. Of particular interest was the slight increase observed between 70 and 90 percent of maximum run time for the exhaustive or maximal run. Karpovich [10] has mentioned that the greatest rise in heart rate occurs within the first 15 seconds and continues to rise for the next “5 seconds of exercise. A plateau is then reached or an occasional secondary rise may be observed when the exercise is intensive. Mean heart rate data of the maximal run for all subjects, as well as for the two subjects who ran the longest time and the two subjects who ran for the shortest periods of time were compared. The two subjects who ran the longest period of time had the most rapid increase in heart rate during the first 20 percent of the maximum run. The two subjects who ran the longest period of time also had the highest mean heart rate until the 70 per cent level of maximum run time was reached. From the 70 percent level of maximum run time until exhaustion, the two subjects who ran the longest had a lower mean heart rate than the 39 other two comparison groups. The two subjects who ran the shortest period of time displayed a more gradual rise in mean heart rate which surpassed and remained above the mean heart rate of the other two groups. This finding is indicated by the data for the 60 and 70 percent levels of 1.11ck 7011 x 1171L101 7’1171 t.i 016? . Heart rate values for the calculated composite run, considering the mean heart rate of the same three groups, demonstrated the same general characteristics as the mean heart rate for the maximum run. However, two exceptions were observed. First, the differences between the heart rate values observed during the rapid increase phase occur— red during the first “0 percent of the composite run time and were not as pronounced as those differences observed during the same period of the maximal run. Second, the changes which occurred between the 60 and 70 percent levels of the maximum run occurred between the “0 to 60 percent levels of the calculated composite run. The results of the heart rate recovery data indicated that an increase in effort by the runners also increased the time required for the heart rate to return to the resting level. In fact, the mean heart rates at both the 50 and 100 percent levels of maximum run time never returned to the resting level in the standard l5—minute recovery period. Figure “.5 shows that the mean heart rate at the 10 percent “0 lPVt‘l Ul'lWleHHHn runl tinmazllmcnd; rettnuied t1) tln1 reyn.inn level, but the mean heart rates for the 50 percent and 100 percent leveal of maximum run time were above the mean resting values by 29.7 and “3.0 beats per minute, respec— tively. tata collected by Brouha and Radford [9:198] dealing with severe work, tend to confirm these recovery results and show that at the end of a 25—minute recovery period the heart rate was 20-25 beats per minute higher than the resting rate. Karpovich[10] Has indicated that in many instances after severe exercise the heart rate did not return to the resting level even after one or two hours of rest. It is also interesting to note that the extent to which the heart rate fails to return to the resting rate within the 15-minute recovery period appears to be related to the size of oxygen debt incurred. 0xygen uptake was used to determine the volume of oxygen utilized per minute by the body for all run and re— covery periods. This variable was also the basis for oxygen debt calculations. The data presented in Figure “.7 and Tables “.8 and “.9 indicated that the mean oxygen uptake in liters per minute increased gradually until the 70 per- cent level of both the maximum run and the calculated com- posite run. At this point, the mean values of the maximum run slightly decreased and leveled off when an apparent limit had been reached at values between “.“2“ and “.272 lite s per minute. This is similar to the trend reported “1 by Taylor [ll]. The mean oxygen uptake for the calculated composite run also decreased, but continued to do so until the 90 percent level of run time when the value increased from 3.6“2 to “.272 leters per minute. It should be pointed out that the mean oxygen uptake for the maximum run was higher than the mean oxygen uptake for the calculated com- posite run except in one instance and that occurring at the 20 percent level. This observation indicated that the oxygen uptake level is dependent on the intensity of the given task, the maximum run being much more severe in nature than the series of runs used to make up the composite run. Mean maximum run oxygen uptake data (Figure “.8 and Table “.8) for all subjects, as well as for the two sub- jects who ran the longest and the two subjects who ran the shortest periods of time were compared. in gene'al, the tWo subjects who ran the longest period of time increased their rate of oxygen uptake more quickly than the others. The mean oxygen uptake values for the same two subjects were higher than the mean values for the other groups except at the 100 percent level of maximum run time. Here the mean value was the lowest of the three comparison groups. Mean oxygen uptake data for the calculated composite run (Figure “.9) for all subjects as well as for the two subjects who ran the longest time and the two subjects who ran the shortest periods of time, indicated the same general pattern as was evident for the maximum run, with two exceptions. 1n the first instance, the differences “n Lvlwvvn the mean values of oxygen uptake of the three com- parison groups was less pronounced for the 10 to 50 percent level of maximum run time during the calculated composite run than during the maximum run. In the second instance, there was a greater fluctuation in mean oxygen uptake between the 70 and 100 percent level of the calculated compostie run than was observed during the same period of maximum run. Again, the greater effort required for the maximum or exhaustive run was evident. The recovery data indicated that the mean oxygen uptake decreased in relation to the intensity of the effort and the time of the runs (Figure “.10). This observation agreed with the findings of Dill [3, “] and Karpovich [10]. This trend also indicated that the recovery oxygen uptake is related to the size of oxygen debt incurred during strenuous exercise. The oxygen pulse, the amount of oxygen being supplied to the body with each heart beat, increased during the first 60 percent of the maximum run and the composite run. (Refer to Figure “.12 and Tables “.13 and “.1“). This was due to an increase in heart rate, oxygen uptake and cardiac output. s the runners became exhausted, a further acceleration of heart rate was observed along with a leveling off, and in some instances, a decrease of oxygen uptake. Consequently, the oxygen pulse decreased. Of particular importance is the higher mean oxygen pulse for the maximum run compared to the M3 calculated composite run. Current literature (6, 9, 10) supports the observed result that as the heart rate increases the stroke volume also increases until a limit in output per beat is reached. Then, the heart becomes inefficient in copint with the severe stress and the output per heart beat decreases as the heart rate continues to increase. Thus, while the oxygen uptake remained relatively stable the oxygen pn11seand (i)) may lwe the wasult CH? the auxility ()F the cir<_:ulatory and respiratory systems to adjust temporarily to this particular stress as noticed in the slight rise of heart rate and oxygen uptake tetween the U0 and 70 percent levesl of the maximum run time. The patterns observed for two of the three groups from the 70 to 100 percent levels of the maximum run time illustrate the inability of the subjects lo efficiently meet the exhaustive stress. The two subjects who ran the longest appeared to never reach the plateau observed with the other groups. The total amount of oxygen uptake observed during the calculated composite run in excess of the resting level is what Hill fl7] termed oxygen requirement or cost of exercise. Figure (H.18) shows the oxygen requirement in liters per minute for the three comparison groups. It is interesting ‘to note that as individuals reached exhaustion, the oxygen requirement increased to a value nearly 50 percent higher than that found during the earlier stages of the run. The pattern of oxygen requirement shows that the requirement increases as the du‘ation or stress of the exercise period increases. CHAPTER V SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS Summary The purpose of this study was to determine the pattern of oxyren debt accumulation with trained varsity athletes during an exhaustive run up a 9 degree grade at 10 m.p.h. on a motor—driven treadmill. Heart rate, oxygen uptake, and oxygen pulse were also studied. Six trained Michigan State University varsity athletes ranging in age from 19 to 21 years each ran a different random sequence of tests of which one was to exhaustion (refer to Table 3.1). Each subject's maximum run was con- sidered to be his 100 percent effort. Computation of 10, f0, 30, NO, 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90 percent levels were found for the exhaustive as well as the calculated composite run. At the conclusion of each test run a standard 15- minute recovery period was used. Only the 10, 50, and 100 percent values of maximum run time recovery periods were used in this study for heart rate, oxygen uptake, and oxygen pulse. Oxygen debt accumulation, however, was found and based on the recovery periods of all oxygen uptake tests. The means and standard deviations of each variable, where appropriate, were used to describe the results. U6 Ll? Heart rate values increased rapidly during the first 30 percent and MO percent of maximum run time for both the exhaustive run and the calculated composite run. Both values slowly continued to increase until exhaustion at the 100 percent level of maximum run time. Slight fluctuations occurred in values obtained for the two subjects who ran the longest period of time and for the two subjec s who ran the shortest period of time. Of particular interest was the lower mean heart rate value observed during the early stages of the run for the two subjects who ran the shortest period of time and with the mean values for all subjects. However, from approximately the 70 percent level of maximum run time, the two subjects who ran the shortest period of time had a higher mean heart rate than the other two com- parison groups. The recovery data indicated that as the run became more intense a longer period of time was necessary in order for the heart rate to return to its normal resting lr‘Vt'l . Oxygen uptake increased steadily until the 70 percent level of maximum run time for both the exhaustive and calcu— lated composite runs. At this point an apparent limit had teen reached. The maximum run values decreased and leveled off. The calculated composite values here decreased gradually until the 90 percent level where an increase was observed. All values for the maximum run were higher than those obtained from the calculated composite run except at the 100 percent #8 level where they were the same. Oxygen uptake values for the two subjects who ran the longest period of time and the two subjects who ran the shortest period of time followed a pattern of progr ssion very similar to the mean values of all subjects. The same may be said for the calculated composite run until the 70 percent level of maximum run time after which a great deal of fluctuation was observed. During the recovery period, the values decreased in a manner which suggested that greater efforts produced a correspondingly slower recovery time as well as a larger accumulation of oxygen debt. Oxygen pulse values increased during the first 60 percent of maximum run time for both the exhaustive and calculated composite runs. Thereafter, a gradual decrease was noted until exhaustion. As was found with the oxygen uptake data, oxygen pulse values for the exhaustive run were higher than the values obtained for the calculated composite run. When the values of the two subjects who ran the longest period of time were compared with the subjects who ran the shortest period of time for the exhaustive run a very small difference was observed. However, this was not the case for the calculated composite run. Here the values fluctuated so much for the two subjects who ran the longest and shortest periods of time that only very general interpretations in terms of mean values for all subjects could be made. During the standard lS—minute recovery period, the values U9 returned to a level which was slightly above the resting level. This indicated that oxygen pulse is also dependent on the intensity of the performance and on the size of the oxygen debt accumulation. Analyzing the oxygen debt accumulation revealed that during the first NO percent of the maximum run time a fairly rapid rise in accumulation occurred. From the A0 to 70 percent level, a less rapid rise was observed followed by a general leveling off in accumulation until exhaustion was reached. This early rapid rise was referred to as the alactacid oxygen debt. The later less rapid rise was re- ferred to as the lactacid oxygen debt[7], The oxygen requirement increased with an increase in the time of the exercise. Conclusions l. The results of this study indicate that the heart rate, oxygen uptake, and oxygen pulse are related to the rate and size of the accumulation of oxygen debt during an ex— haustive run. 2. A rapid early rise followed by a slight temporary adjustment and another not-so—rapid rise seemed to reflect the pattern of oxygen debt accumulation in terms of the intensity of the exercise. Alactacid oxygen debt and lact- acid oxygen debt may well be illustrated by the two increases in the total oxygen debt accumulation. U7 0 3. When the two subjects who ran the longest and the two subjects who ran the shortest periods of time were included, individual contributing differences were noted which limited the specific conclusions. Recommendations Future research concerned with oxygen debt accumulation using the exhaustive run and calculated composite run techniques should be directed along the following line: 1. Research should be undertaken which would allow for repetition fo run sequences. 2. Research should be undertaken which would study the relationships between metabolic factors such as lactate levels. 3. Research should be undertaken which would expand and possibly modify the technique of using a percent value of maximum run time to calculate the progressive changes which develop during an exhaustive or maximal run. A. A larger, more random sample should be used. LITERATURE C ITED 51 wk.’ A. 11. LITERATURE CITED Christensen, E. H. and Hogbery, P. ”Steady-state Op deficet and Op debt at severe work." Arbiets- phyr'. 1 0108.10 , 1142251-2511, 1950 . (fort:l(xtzici, l). l“.; Lloiuiscni, Ii. 16., arul 1%HTOITI, Ii. .1. fhysiological Measurements of Metabolic Functions in Man. New York: McGraw—Hill Book Co., inc., 1 9 (if) :3 . hill, D. 8., Edwards, H. T.; Newman, E. V.; and Margaria, R. "Analysis of recovery from anaerobic work." Arbitsphysiologic, 9:298-307, 1936. hill, C. H. and Sacktor, B. "Exercise and oxygen debt." Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 222—13, 1962. Canslen, H. V. "Influence of training upon the aerobic and anaerobic metabolic variables." Unpublished thesis, University of Illinois, 1953. Guyton, A. C. Textbook of Medical Physiology. 2d ed. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 1961. Hill, A. V.; Long, C. N. H.; and Upton, M. "Muscular exercise, lactic acid and supply and utilization of oxygen." Proc. Royal Society, pp. 96—97, 1924. Huckebee, W. A. "Relationships of Pyruvate and Lactate during Anaerobic Metavolism," Journal of Clinical investigation, 37:269-271, 1953? Johnson, W. H., ed. Science and Medicine of Exercise and Sports. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1960. harpovich, f. V. "Physiology of Muscular Activity, Nth ed. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 1955. Kleiter, M. The Fire of Life. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1961. 52 I.) ’% Mnrnnria, H.; Edwards, H. T.; and hill h. H. “The pruutible umx;harm:uns of'cxnitractilnfi and.pxuwinm the oxygen debt and the role of lactic acid in muscular contraction.” American Journal of Physiology, 106:689—713, 1933. Robinson 8.; Robinson, D. L.; Mountfoy, R. J.; and Ballard, R. W. "Fatigue and efficiency of men during exhaustive runs." Journal of Applied Physiology, 12:197-202, 1958. Rushmer, R. F., and Smith, D. A. "Cardiac Control” Physiological Review. 30:Ul, 1959. f‘ Stalev n. C. chairman. Exercise and Fitness. ‘ 3 3 Co]oquim Papers. Monticello, 111.: University of Illinois, 1959.