A STUDY OF THfi VIBRATING REED AS A DEVICE FOR THE DETERMINATION OF VISCOELASTIC PROPERTIES Them for ”'00 Doqru of M. 5. MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY William Wai Tung Seto 1961 This is to certify that the thesis entitled A STUDY OF THE VIBRATING REED AS A DEVICE FOR THE DETERMINATION OF VISZOELASTIC PROPElTIES presented by WILLIAM WAI TUNG SETO hes been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for MASTER OF SEIENCE degree in AEELIED MECHANICS Mljor professor Date May ’4; 1961 0-169 ABSTRACT A Study of the Vibrating Reed as A Device for the Determination of Viscoelastic Properties by William Wai Tung Seto When cantilever specimens of different lengths are subjected to various values of frequency of vibration by an impressed forced vibration at the clamped end, the ratio of the amplitudes of oscillation of the free to the clamped end at the steady state condition can be found. If the phase lag of the free end behind the clamped end is also measured, the vis— coelastic complex modulus can be calculated from the mathematical relation derived. In addition to the internal damping of the material of the cantilever specimens, there is inherent- ly airbdamping when the cantilever specimens are oscill- ating. The effect and significance of this airhdamping on the vibrating reed test of a material are also consi- dered. A brief outline of the simple linear vis— coelastic theory is also included. A STUDY OF THE VIBRATING REED AS A DEVICE FOR THE DETERMINATION OF VISCOELASTIC PROPERTIES By William Wai Tung Seto A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Applied Mechanics 1961 Acknowledgement The author wishes to acknowledge the support given.to this work by the Division of Engineering Research, Michigan State University --—- Mr. John W. Hoffman, Director; also to express his sincere thanks to Dr. Clement A. Tatro of the Department of Applied Mechanics, Michigan State University for his invaluable help and his kind permission for unlimited use of his equipment. Major Professor Dr. George E. Ease. TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. INTRODUCTION .......................... I II. OBJECT .................... ..... ....... 2 III. REVIEW OF PREVIOUS EXPERIMENTAL W0 ” .. 3 IV. EXPERIMENTAL WORK ..................... 7 V. MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS ................. 9 VI. AIRrDAMPING .................. ..... .... 13 VII. DISCUSSIONS ........................... 19 VIII. APPENDIX .............................. 21 BIBLIOGRAPHY .................. ..... ... 25 Chapter I Introduction 1 Most engineering materials when subjected to loads do not behave as perfectly elastic solids. The assumptions of homogeneity, isotrop , and time-indepene dent elasticity are in direct contrast to the phenomenon of fatigue, time and temperature-sensitive cohesive strength and creep behavior of real materials. There- fore, the analysis of the mechanical behavior of such materials requires information obtained through various studies concerned with the degree to which real materials differ from the ideal Hookean solid. In particular, for example, many of the physical "constants" related to stress analysis of a given material are sensitive to loading rates and thereby lead to a consideration of the so called 'dynamic constants". A method which has been used widely in the determination of such constants is the so-called vibrating reed test. It is with a study of this test that the following investigation concerns itself. Chapter II Object The primary purpose of this investigation is to study analytically and experimentally the use of the vibrating reed as a means of determining viscoelastic properties. The experimental portion of the work was carried out using methyl methacrylate (commercially known as plexiglas or perspex) as the test material. Various influences such as the effect of airbdamping, excitation frequency, and reed geometry were considered and included as part of the investigation. Chapter III Review of Previous Experimental Work 3 A review of the literature dealing with the determination of the dynamic physical constants reveals a number of experimental and instrumentation techniques appropriate to the present work. Among the many different driving mechanisms used as the driver to impart a sinusoidal oscillation to one end of the reed, a phonograph recording head was used by an early investigator, M. Horia of M. I. T. (1)“ For vibrations with low and moderate damping, the "electros- tatic method" for driving is preferrable, and has been employed in the determination of "inelastic losses" in some high polymers as a function of frequency and temp— erature. It makes use of a metal foil fixed on the free end of the reed. The metal foil is attracted by an al— ternating potential in the air-gap of a strong magnet. Some investigators attain the required sine usoidal oscillation of the reed by subjecting it to an impressed force, supplied by an audio oscillator through “Numbers in brackets refer to bibliography at the end of this report. 4 a mechanical linkage between a permanent magnet speaker and the centerline of the reed. Sustained oscillations of the reed can also be achieved by suitable adaptation of reciprocating apparatus designed for other purposes; such was the case taken by the present work. As far as the measurement of the amplitude of vibration of the free end of the reed is concerned, some investigators used a stroboscope, synchronized with the frequency of oscillation of the reed, for easier viewing of the maximum points. A. W. Nolle (2) used a small telescope with crosshairs on it for this purpose; While L. E. Nielsen (3) employed a differential trans- former to convert amplitude of mechanical oscillations to electrical potentials. Another possible means of measuring the amplitude of vibration is by measuring the capacitance across two plates with a fixed piece of dielectric material attached to the reed and passing between the two fixed plates with the vibration of the reed thus causing a change of capacitance. In the "electrostatic method" mentioned 5 above, the vibration of the end of the reed is observed by an optical method. The end of the reed interrupts a light beam. When the reed vibrates, this light beam is modulated, and in falling on a photo-cell, creates an. A. 0. signal proportional to the amplitude of vibration. This signal is then amplified by conventional means and fed into suitable recording apparatus. Although it has only indirect connection with this work, it is interesting to note that based on vis— coelastic behavior, a method has been developed for mathematical treatment of a sinusoidal rate of loading of fibers (4). Here the vertical displacements of a Weight attached to the end of single filament of fiber is recorded by a movie camera, with a ground-glass as the screen and a synchronous motor as the clock. Initial displacement is given by means of an electromagnet, and temperature as well as humidity are controlled through- out the whole experiment. On some occasions, the evaluation of the dynamic constants of a material can also be made from the measurements of the velocity of transmission and the attenuation of sound in the material. however, this has 6 been chiefly applied to ' low loss " materials, such as metals and some plastics. It consists of a signal gene- rator, crystal driver, pickup, amplifier, and scope (5). This experiment is elaborate, extensive, and expensive. In addition, the material used for this investigation does not come under this " low loss " catalogue, and hence it was not used. Chapter IV Experimental Work The vibrating reed apparatus consists of two main components: namely a driving clamp to impart a sinusoidal displacement to one end of the reed, and a recording apparatus to measure the displacement of the free end. In this work, the "calibrating beam", de- signed and built by the hichigan State Highway Depart- ment, was used as the driver to impart sinusoidal osci- llations of various frequencies to the clamped end of the reed. With regard to the measurement of the ampli- tude of vibration of the free end of the reed, much effort was spent in careful consideration and prelimi- ary attempts to build and use apparatus such as the rotating drum, the photo—cell, capacitors, movie camera, and telescope with cross—hairs, all of which have been listed as methods of suitable merit in the previous section of this report. It was found, however, that with. "visual observation" some care and operator experience, a method provided data of nearly equivalent to the indi- Oated accuracy with a great saving of effort. In this, 8 a straight edge mounted on a tripod-stand was brought close to the end of the vibrating reed for determining the value of the corresponding displacement. This is possible because the amplitude of vibration of the free end will reach a constant steady state magnitude after the transient motion of vibration has died out. The ratio of the amplitudes of oscillation of the free to the clamped end at three different fre- quencies, namely 270 c.p.m., 435 c.p.m., and 645 c.p.m., were measured for different lengths of reed, the material of which were assumed to be statistically homogeneous and to have constant lateral dimensions. I - Frequency of Vibration (c.p.m.) Lengths of reed Width of reed (1 inch) 18 ’ 17 '16 5 15 f 14 13 f 276 €5.6 9.7 -4.8- 2.9 1.8 1.3 i 425 ;5.9 6.1 4.9 3.2 2.9 1.5 . 3 645 '5.4 4.8 4.3 4.0 3.1 2.3 ‘ \.—_ ._-- Width of reed (E inch)f .1 .. 1_“ “’*'“ {18 17 16 - 15 14 13 _—.___..._ A.--a - . 270 [4.6 9.6 -5.4 3.5 2.3 1.7 425 '3.7 4.8 3.2 2.2 1.8 1.4 645 2.2 .3°1 §2.7 1.8 1.4 1.1 j __1_ _1i.,."_11._1__1J._1-_11L-_-----L1_1-.1 Chapter V Mathematical Analysis The problem involved here is to obtain the response of a viscoelastic cantilever beam undergoing sinusoidal oscillations at the clamped end. Because of the time-dependent boundary conditions, it is convenient to employ the Mindlianoodman procedure (6) to solve the associated elastic beam problem and then by means of the elastic-viscoelastic correspondence principle to convert the results to obtain the solution for the viscoelastic beam. Thus for the beam shown in the following diagram, a sin.wt 1:;irh 3 7" 't‘ "' . 1-..; Boundary conditions y(O,t) = a sin wt ........ (l) (%§x=o=o (2) (;.§)x=l=o (3) (3:1)x=l=0 (4) Initial conditions y(0) = O oooooooooooooooooooooo (a) §(O) ...... (b) O ......OOOOOOOOO. 10 The differential equation for lateral vibration of beam is ~.2 « 4 ;‘1- + 112.11 = O and n2 =~——E--~---I- 5—- .) t- fl 4 A f C x where E = Young's modulus of elasticity, I = moment of inertia of cross-section, A = cross-sectional area, V”: weight of material per unit volume Assume the solution y(x,t) = e(x,t) + f(t) g(x) = e(x,t) + a sin wt g(x) Therefore, the beam equation becomes 2 14 :1 2 _ _ 2 .-4 2 n (:3 i ) + ,\ §2_- n a sin Wt, g, + gaw sin wt The boundary conditions become e(O,t) :2 a sin wt (1 - 3(0)) ........ (la) Ligfio’fil=;— a Sin Wt 8(0) cocoa-000000 (23) w) 1 'e(1.t ;;__H;E-R= _ a sin Wt g (1) 00.000000... (3&) A e(1,t) -«v = — a Sin Wt g (l) ooooooooooo (4a) ’; I} If g is g =.E sin B: + F 008 Bx + G sinh Bx +4H cosh Bx w where B - n It can be shown that the boundary conditions on e become zero if g is such that 11 E II I a) - E sin Bl - F cos Bl + G sinh Bl +.H cosh Bl = O - E cos Bl + F sin Bl + G cosh Bl + H sinh Bl =:O after solving the above equations, 3(1) =>G (sinh Bl - sin Bl) + H(cosh Bl - cos Bl) + cos Bl When.the transient motion has died out, 1.8. e(x,t)——'~0, the steady state response of the beam will be y(x,t) = a sin wt 3(X) Therefore, y(l,tl_ cos Bl + cosh Bl y(O,t) = 8(1) = l + cos Bl cosh Bl which is the ratio of the amplitudes of vibration of the free to the clamped end, and 2 % 13,33”, \EI/ \‘ W a frequency of oscillation, m mass per unit length, E = Young‘s modulus of elasticity. II R denotes the ratio of the amplitudes of oscillation of the free to the clamped end, and Q the phase lag of the free end behind the clamped end, then _ 1,4 cos B1 + cosh Bl R e = *-~w-~~- l + cos Bl cosh Bl 12 The solution for a viscoelastic material is given by re- placing the elastic modulus E by the corresponding visco- elastic complex modulus. This is best obtained by the graphical method as shown here. Sample calculation: when Bl a 1.00, cos B1 = O. 5403 cosh B1 = 1.5431 _ 1, 0.5403 + 1.5431 2.0834 R e = —-—--— , - = . 1 + 0.5403 x 1.5431 1.8337 .2 i R‘éit I// i , 1 i ! : /.// O L////--H >-— 0 l 13 Chapter VI Air - Damping For a cantilever loaded by its own weight, the deflection of the free end is _W_1_:._ d = 8 EI where W = weight of beam per unit length, E = Young’s modulus of elasticity, I a moment of inertia of cross-section, l = length of beam. It can be shown that the fundamental natural frequency of free vibration of the cantilever beam loaded by its own weight is .— H--...__ .... ....— - - w 14 Let ‘1 , w2 be the natural frequencies of two cantilever beams made of the same material, having the same thickness, but different both in width and length. But for rectangular cross-sections, b h3 b2 h3 1 I _ 1 _‘— 12 2- 12 I1: 14 For the same material, 2 Therefore, .. __1_. i f 8 E h3blg 8 E h2g w = l __ -_ - -...-- -1, . __ = ._ l J 7'hblli ‘ 7 1: 3 fi1i_______1 __ 8 E h b2g 8 E h g w = ~—--— = 2 , -5 4 , 4, 4 4 hb212 J .12 Now if 11 = 12, then w:L = W2 1. e. the two cantilever beams will 9 vibrate freely at the same natural frequency. In other Words, cantilever beams of the same length, thickness, and made of the same material will vibrate freely at the same frequency even though their widths are different. This is true when there is no damping force other than their own internal damping. However, if the amount of air— resistance is negligible compared to the amount of inter— nal damping present in the system, the system, as a whole, Will not be affected much. The following table gives the Values of natural frequency of free vibration of cantilever beams of various lengths and widths; they are, however, made of the 15 material, methyl methacrylate, and are of the same thick- ness. These experimental results were obtained through the use of SR - 4 strain gages, Universal Strain Analyzer, and pen - and - ink oscillograph. Length of Width of , Width of Cantilever Cantilever l f Cantilever % 17 in. 5.11 c.p.s. 4.67 c.p.s. 16 in. 5.71 c.p.s. ’ 5.42 c.p.s. : 15 in. 6031 0013080 5093 copes. l 1 14 in. '1 7,34 c.p.s. 6067 Cop-.8. : b _.-_ __..__, - _ _ 1 . _ _. . .. --.._. . - __ .1 , ; I i | ‘-~-];3_ 1n. 1 8034 CopoSo i 7075 c.p.s’ ; These results indicate that air-damping cannot be ignored in this vibrating reed test of this particular material. Another way for the determination of the influence of air-damping on the vibrating reed is the "logarithmic decrement" which is the logarithm of the two consecutive amplitudes of displacement in a decaying curve of vibration. As has pointed out in the previous part of this section, L1 = L2 is a condition for the reeds to vibrate freely at the same frequency. In other words, whenLl = L2 the values of the logarithmic decrement determined from two decaying curve of free vibration should be the same. Let D be the logarithmic decrement, therefore D = ln(Al/A2) = ln