l } l \ M‘ 11‘ l‘ { ‘rl ' ’H H N “17 1, "r ‘ l I I I l i II I I I 4 H } THS _:__; lli \JN tyal‘ (DO W A STUDY OF THE PROTEIN REQUIREMENTS OF NORMAL FOUR YEAR OLD CHILDREN THESIS FOR THE DEBBIE OF M. 8. Margaret j Nunn 1931 . . 'I ' '7 - ' . y. ,' «. _~ ‘ u ' ' A l-~ Q ( ‘ . f. l ‘ I ‘ ‘ .‘ I. I RA . ‘ - ‘ [.1 \' 'J T -.-’ I F "AA HESIS ' ‘ t a l I I I L . V t ) ‘ l S I r I I . \ ' - l ‘ I l \ ‘. I ' . ' . a l \ ‘ 0 "f. . a I ' . 3:; G l ‘v I. I _ . "4m; \ ““L¥:r A" . ~ .‘{.lln~ ’4 O p‘. i, ‘ I: .\ \ fa I ‘l V ' 0 V ' I l I F Y . q I I A S T U D Y OF THE P R O T E I N R E Q U I R E M E N T S OF N O R M A L F O U R Y E A R O L D C H I L D R E N A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Michigan State College in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science by Margaret J. Dunn Department of Food and Nutrition Division of Home Economics 1951 THESWfl Object of Experiment Review of Literature « Procedure Discussion of Results Summary and Conclusions Bibliography 113$- 19’?" Acknowledgment For the helpful suggestions given during this study, the writer is very grateful to Dr. Marie Dye, under whose general supervision the problem was done. She also greatly appreciates the kindly advice and criticisms given by Miss Whittaker. Special appreciation is due, also, to the mothers of the children used as subjects and to Miss Miller and her assistants, whose Splendid cooperation made the work pleasant. A STUDY OF THE PROTEIR REUJIREHRNTS OF NORMAL FOUR YEAR OLD CHILDREN Introduction: In the field of metabolism studies through dietary 3 experiments upon human beings, considerrblo work has } been done with adult subjects and some with infants, but very little with individuals of the early growth q ards nave been set up 9...! period or pre-school age. Stan( showing the optimum proportions of protein, calories,. and minerals for adults, then these values have been reduced proportionately and allowances made to meet the needs of younger people. The object of this study was to determine the level on which normal four year old children maintained the most efficient nitrogen retention. Review of Literature: A study of the literature shows that different methods have been used.(l) The earliest investigators considered the needs of two children equivalent to the needs of one adult. In 1866, Atwater (1) proposed a scale with the adult male as the standard, and cal- culated the needs of the other individuals in prOpor- tion. Engel, a Saxon statistician, nine years later took an infant during the first year of age as the unit, and calculated on the basis of height—weight statistics that an increase of one—tenth over the de— mands for the first year was needed for each additional year. The plan, however, was not extensively accepted. Atwater used the energy standards of Voit and inter— polated an assumed value for children of two to six years, arranging his table in terms of a man's need. A review of the literature shoes that little thoroughly controlled res-arch was don; before the latter part of the nineteenth century. Most of the early work was done in Germany, and was of a purely clinical type. The conclusions were not warranted by either the number of children studied or the conditions I f under which they lived. Len" of the sub ects were (J l...“ abnormal. Var ations are great in normal children, but are greater in abnormal. Therefore many misleading deductions were made, but they were used because they were the only ones availzble. Among the German authors :hose conclusions we find much quoted in Spite of their inaccuracies are Hrsse, Herbst, Huller, Uflemann, Camerer, Baginsky and Sterling. These investigators studied the caloric reeuirenent of children as well as the protein, yet many of the subjects under ob- servation proved to be under-fed. In their summary of caloric schedules proposed by various authors, Holt and Fales (2) show by comparison the great variations among data that have previously been accepted as standg ards. This summary is as follows: AER? ' ‘ ' ' W” ' '" ' "W“ WW“ "‘"aiBHE's—riiio gram "’1 'EBEEl""”'"'l§E:}E:EEB:ETREEE”?}EEEEZEElEEE'EEZEEE'Ffi . V v .' . I ? Camerer I 89 80 I 78 75 84 f 77 j FW""”‘” T"— ” "‘ "T‘M’M "‘” ' I I Ufelmenn . 88 * 80_“J 75”“i ”7;‘_4M_§8 -::,1* '- F Steffen _v_"r}15 99 ' 1;§,_-_135 114 1_::: . ‘ i 1 figl_“& Bales ¥1oo w 95 -l.§§_. 84 L £&LW_.,.94 811.11 6.11.13. , 7L 1.13.11- ._ 82---!-_.5_. .11. 2-- ' "71.11-- _- __ I ‘Lusk-ggget Chll§_l-79 97 -99__-“_§8 4+ 79- _. ~‘ I " -cctive " * ~-_,' 1? 117 1- 118 * 19§___ 195 r“ ' 1‘" 7- ‘ . L" —very 3_ " -—_. 195 177 175 [_158 . 158 s I— ' 2 V 0 WT ' Y F Girls 7 ; ! ‘ Y I ‘ TQ§E€§T ,-H_01L §&__hlfiflu_i-1§n_ 75 3 ZQ__l-§7 t Holt & 58198- 101 94 I 87 82 l 78 78 j l ' T 1.11-- w ' ‘1 3mm -:::;1..1:.9;5:J:..:8:531 gauged- Lilli/‘37; Holt and Fales (2) recommend that, in calculating the total caloric r Cuirement of children, the component parts of that total be considered. These are: basal meta- bolism, growth, musculer activity, and the food values lost in the excreta. The basal requirements used by them are the ones determined by Benedict and Talbot. The latter studied a large number of children in Boston and furnished most of the data on which all the modern meta— bolism curves are based (5). They have found basal needs highest per kilogram of body weight at 9 months and steadily falling from then to adult life. The excreta loss is about 10 per cent for all ages after infancy. The growth requirement is greatest when growth is most active, or during the first year and adolescence. It is nearly uniform from four to ten years. Activity is the only factor that varies widely with the individual, the other three being nearly uniform for children of the same weight under similar conditions. Holt and Fales give as the total caloric requirement of child— ren: 100 calories per kilogram at 1 year (9.5 kilograms). For boys, this falls to 80 calories per kilogram at 6 years (20 kilograms) and remains constant to 15 years. The activity increase is met by basal reduc— tion. After 50 kilograms are reached, the energy value is reduced to the adult standard of 48 calories per kilogram. For girls, the requirement falls to 76 calories per kilogram at 6 years (20 kilograms) and continues to fall until 10 years, At this age it rises, and remains at 80 calories per kilogram until grow h is complete; when it falls to the adult standard of 48 calories per kilogram. Various dietary scales and standards have been used to measure the nutritive needs of the members of the family. Edith Hawley reviews these in her develop- ment of the scale used by the U. S. Department of Agri- culture. (1) Her description of the scales of Atwater and Engel has already been reviewed. From 1886 to 1915, the increase in nutrition studies gave new light on metabolic needs. In View of this, and because of the inconsistent use of dietary scales for the reiuirements of the various members of the family, Sherman felt it necessary to study the energy reouirements of children and eXpress them in calories instead of the percentage of a man's need. In his introduction to Gillett's study (4), he says, "In our opinion, the food require- ment for each member of the family should be determined on his own merits rather than in terns of the man's requirement." This was the first real step towards attention to the child's individual needs, and as a result of it, Gillett (4) brought together all the dietary studies and metabolism exneriments that con- tained data on the energy requirements of healthy child- ren. On the evidence of 564 studies, she made the following table of standards: .Aee vears)_ Ca ories day LBovs)tJCalories day (Girls) Legit; a_ 900 :u1200 a_ J 800 — 1200 m I (N H O O C) I [.4 CW 0 O (O O I I \7 (1.) N I I-h I—" I-‘ C) O I |._I H3 O [O 1...: D (3) O I H CH C) O L‘ I—' H I I'-‘ 2’0 N) H O C) I TO 1&- C) H Q U"! C) I @050 I—‘ 5 I I—’ :N {(1 N C) I TO ~Q Q C) I-’ CD \J'I U I __2150 H m I H .q m m C) O I p O O O I ’\3 M m 0 I 1600 The energy allowances for children of 5 - 5 years may be summarized in the following table. (This is the Specific age period of the present study and is therefore used in this table). 111.111.: 5.927.: 9.1.1118. I ClekiLJE 3.719.121 c1 I d - c 1 I 121-111! 843223919; 1 aisle-Lula”. n g-.rl £2E2£§£-- 78 ‘ 84 "‘ ._.. 7511M7O 11:..1-.J Ufelmann ‘# 75 - 68 —:: _-- -_" I I I Steffen .1. 105 - ll@_ -~u ——— ——— ' I Holt & Fales 88 - 82 1155 — 1580 82 — 72 1150 1 155 I 0 {o I _._L_, Gillett 85_- 77 1150 — 1550 79 — 75 1150 lag i Lusk 90 — 77 145 - 1650 ——~ 1400 — 1650 Rose m 0 I CD 0 L I I I b w o I m o I I I Atwater --- 1295 — 1425 The total protein reouirement during the growth period depends upon the character of the protein and the total caloric intake. In estimating a child's protein requirement, two equally important factors must be considered; first, tissue maintenance; and second, growth. Sherman (5) states that, on the basis of adult needs, a child's requirement for maintenance is about 1 to 1.5 grams per kilogram per day, from either animal or vegetable source. In addition to this, growth re- quirements must be met. This should be done largely with animal protein. It is difficult to estimate the amount required. Little wor; has been reported on the protein need and the effect of protein upon the growth of children. Osborne and Mendel's (6) experiments on rats and the work of Newburgh and his associates (7) on rats and rabbits indicate that growth is affected by the kind and amount of protein. One of the best ways to deter- mine the protein need of normal children is through a metabolism study, whereby the nitrogen balance will indicate the efficiency with which the body is using its protein supply. There is little scientific data on the composition of the diet of children over one year of age. Lucy Gillett (4) summarizes studies made from 146 cases of 18 authors whose work was large observational, and includes the values of protein intake as indicated by various authors up to 1917. Age (years)Ifio1 caseszotal proEEinTProteim‘intake.~q __ _ ‘h_gmslday‘4 av'_EELE;lQ._ 2 — 5 fl; -_ 51 55 5.5g 6 — 9 44gg 57 215 10 - 15 55 13 2.0 14 - 17__ 18 #94 ____ M 2.2 g The total range in all of the cases over one year, as studied by Miss Gillett, was from 1.57 to 4.86 gms. of protein per kilogram of body weight. Camerer (8), in 1896, recommended over 4 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight for the first year, 5 to 4 grams per kilogram up to 8 years of awe, then over 2 grams per kilogram until 14 years, and 1.7 grams per kilogram at the end of the growth period. J. P. Parsons, in his report on the nitrogen meta- bolism of children (9), gives a comprehensive survey of the work on protein reouirements done by foreign workers since 1900. Several of his comments are inter- esting. -10... Siegert, 1916 (9), showed that nursing children require one gram of protein per kilogram of body weight per day, while children of three to six years require three to four grams per kilogram per day. Muller (9) made a metabolism study of 52 children in an orphan asylum. This was done during the cool part of the year, using from 5 to 7 preliminary days with the ordinary diet and 6 days with the Special diet. He found the average of protein calories to be 15.8 per cent of the total. The average nitrogen in— take was 0.55 grams per kilogram or about 5.4 grams per day. The daily nitrogen output was about 5.18 grams. Holt and Fales (8) criticize this work because much of it was done on underweight, undernourished children. Schlossmen and Murschhauser, in 1910, (9) worked on a study of the oxygen exchange of individuals of various ages. They decided that the difference between the metabolism of children and adults is due to the added growth needs of Children. A study of food and protein requirements of three children was made by Stargardter in 1912. (9) His results are not of great value, however, because he varied the caloric intake from day to day. Ruotsalainen (9), in 1921, made a study of protein requirements, keeping the total caloric value constant - 11 - from day to day and varying only one type of food. On a diet with sufficient basal protein intake, he added isodynamic quantities of fat, protein and carbohydrate. He found a nitrogen balance maintained on two to three grams of protein per kilogram per day. The nitrogen retention was greatest when protein was added to the constant diet. He found that the nitrogen retention seemed to be the expression of an actual protein addi- tion. More recent workers have found a greater nitrogen retention when carbohydrate is added to the diet. Practical use is made of this fact in feeding during disease where there is a toxic destruction of protein. Gephart (10), in 1917, made an observational dietary study in a more reliable way than much of the work reviewed by Parsons. He studied the diet of 350 boys through adolescence at St. Paul's boarding school, Concord, N. H. He found the protein intake very high. The daily average was 160 grams or 2.6 to 5.8 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight. His children were beyond pre-school age, however, and were very active. Holt and Fales (8), in 1921, collected the food consumption data for more than.lOO health normal children from 1 to 16 years of age and found that their figures agreed rather well with the average for the various age groups. The urinary excretion was 4 to 6 -12... grams of nitrogen per day for all ages. This figure is hi her than was found by either Muller or Rubner. U") The average total protein intake during the second year was 44 grams; in the sixth and seventh year, 60 grams; in the twelfth year, 80 grams; in the fourteenth to sixteenth years, 130 grams; and at eighteen years, 115 grams. The protein intake of children under 6 years averaged over 3 gra s per kilogram. For older child— ren, the average was 2 grams per kilogram. This indi- cates a reduction with age. These children received about two thirds of their protein from animal sources and one third froa vegetable sources. Fleming and Hutchi.son (11), in 1924, found the normal absorption of nitrogen to be 60 — 95 per cent of the intake. From 1926 to 1929, Chi Che Wang and her associates (12) made a series of studies on the metabolisn of undernourished children. They used normal children as controls. Their resalts indicate that the per cent of absorption of nitrogen is about the same in both normal and underweight children (99 - 92 per cent). The nitrogen retention, however, increases with the degree of undernutrition. Dr. Wang has also found that high protein diets do not spear to have any harmful 1 effects on children. She found that the nitrogen re- tention for all children is directly proportioned to the nitrOgen intake. Other investigators who have differed in the per cent allowance of protein for adults or children are Voit, Playfair and Gautier - 16 per cent of total fuel value (high) Atwater - 15 per cent of total fuel value Landworthy — 12 per cent of total fuel value Chittenden - 8.5 per cent of total fuel value advocates low protein intake Benedict - liberal allowance Meltzer - allow for storage of protein as a factor of safety. The dietary standards of the past tend to indicate a liberal intake of protein. Sherman (15) claims that it is inadvisable to use as a standard the least amount to which the body can adjust itself, but rather to regard as the normal re— quirement an anount which will enable the body to (1 maintain not only its equilibrium, Lut 150 some such J reserve store of protein as we are accumstomed to carry. -14.. Parsons, in 1950 (9), studied protein maintenance levels for the pre-school child, finding a nitrogen balance possible on 1.1 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight. An allowance of one gram of protein ncily per kilogram of body weight, or 50 per cent above the pre- sent estimate of actual re uiroments seems a reasonable standard to use as a general guide for adults. Little can be said with confidence regarding the optimum amount of protein for children after the nursing period (15). Hell planned dietaries generally contain 12 to 15 per cent of the total energy in the form of protein calories. During the period of rapid growth, much of the protein of the food is used to synthesize body protein. The amount of protein needed to produce one gram of body protein varies with the amino acid content of the food. Therefore, the specific anino acids supplied are of great importance. Hoobler, B. R. (9), in 1915, found that infants utilize their protein most efficiently when the calories from this source represent 10 per cent of the total caloric intake. Sherman placed this figure at 9 per cent to meet the needs of an adult. To allow for varying conditions and for individual D .L preferences, as well as to provide a liberal margin 0 - 15 _ Ho safety, t is customary to consider from 10 to 15 per 1‘ cent of the total calories in the form 01 protein calories. Mary Swartz Rose (14) says that it is ap— parent that an allowance of 15 per cent of the total calories in the forn of protein calories gives the growing child at all ag s a surplus of 0.75 to 1.35 ('0 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight above the probable requirement. Any intermediate value should be adequate when the proteins are of good quality and the diet as a whole meet all other nutritive re mire- ments. Procedure: The purpose of this study was to determine the level on which normal four year old children maintained the most efficient nitrogen retention. Three seearate -eriods were planned, with about six or eight weeks time elausing between them. It was exoected that the optinum level would be between 2 and 4 grams of pro- tein per kilogram of body weight. During the first period, therefore, 2 grams per kilogram were taken as the 1 wer level. The intermediate level during the (0 second period mas on the basi. of 3 grams per kilogram, 1 .ms per kilosren formed |\ and on the third period, 4 gr the hisher level. C.) A quantitative metabolisn stufiy involves the {Q planninv o: a diet adequate for experimental purpose , the feedinf of this diet to the subject for a given preparatory period, followed by a period of collection of urine and fecal samples. Then, by a chemical analr- (A sis of an accurately measured sen le of the food intake as Well as analysis of the excreta, the amount used by the body for metabolic purposes may be determined. One or more of the food constituents may be verisc amount or ouality, and the results thus deternined. In general this was the plan followed in this study. The oesemzm + ee4ua ecu pace * owed. X ppmaflfio a om poems“ ow ma oooa* om was o.om 05 mm .e .m mfimww of? T... mm ms* we we emmes 2...: 33.5% cm... $12. 0.5 2.. en $8.3. m.me e.em* m.em‘ ma eemH* om mfiwae o.ma OE ms .m .u we sm$ we we mama$ om ms m.mH Os om .4a .m m.ms m.mm m.m« Assess maioa+ seme* u.mm w* mpeflaev ma* emmflm em* Heuoa m.mH on me som.>< s mumx 971. 3-3% $3.2X as... Aux—emeq tax—amwv mmxfiem q meflpoawo Hmpoe .Wu seam .eme goo Hepop a mafisa pm; .ea .me afloposm mmflhoaso .p olee as, .ensm H .mnmmaampm H wanes was mesmemMWSoom week 17 -13- ‘0 I ca oric intake remained constant throughout the series of studies at the value best suited to each child ac— cording to accepted standards. The protein intake was varied in each study, first on an estimated low level, supposed to be just above maintenance, then on the ex- pected normal level, and lastly, on a high levcl. Table No. I summarizes these requirements and variations for the children studied. From the data secured from the analysis of the food and excreta, he optimum intake for nitrogen balance and adequate metabolism was determined. The difficulties met in such a study are great, and eXplain to a certain degree the absence of exten- sive data. Care is necessary to prevent contamination of samples. In order to keep the child's daily routine just as normal as possible during the study, the attention of at least one person is constantly required to be sure food habits are properly observed and no excrete lost. The sutjects for this experiment were three normal, healthy, active, nursery school children, two boys and one girl. Their ages, weights, and heights are given in Table II. The children Spent each 63* according to usual schedule in the nursery scnool, where the splendid cooperation of the instructor and soapsaoomma naasmm eaaeo cacanmee .mmanmp coo; u maseamm * amass s cameos =aoogeaaso was sonsmcH ma aoapfinpsz mo moamfiomg meansp amass was ado: u mamas“ oaaoaso empmasoaau was magma m «spa Hague: How H canoe be mmea moan 1‘N we «.mm, go.ms4. adammmudaaMm HmH 4:4 we ouoa come ewe.ea+ ¢.HN ‘1 _ as ea HH IS. wood 33 W93 $151 v.8 IE} 3 a) mm as S % -UH .7”; A A om mama mews Hmw mm.nme wwqw N.ow =¢\a,ms awwwmsm qdaqwm HHH e Hm some news HH Awquwu. m.ma caves wH mm 83 some H use? waded $3 .643 EH 3 ca 3. «M. .H .91 . om Hmma omms HHH aw.ma+ ‘wm.H+ .w.om gwwa as emVWIwN 05 mm HHH l as mama mama HH aw.mH+ v m.om :1 as mm .#H mm 33 mm: H val? 13...; $13.. .3 aural “E can an x0 H :Hj .ns mews «.9: 11w “.ma an am an as op.ooa op.oom fleece proa Hwaoa .me anon awry “nob .mm .mofiwnwpm mnfippam FM monenfi campah cascade names: assess a new ghee...psm 19 I N O I her assistants made it possible for the children to follow their usual life. Eoually splendid cooperation was obtained from the mothers of the children who took charge of collection of samples over night. The general health of the subjects during the experimental periods was satisfactory. The prevalence of colds during the early part of the first and second stuies interfered somewhat. The children were urged to drink all the water they could in order to prevent constipation whicn occurred to some extent during the second period, but not seriously enough to interfere with the completion of the metabolism study. Special precautions were taken to prevent this before the sub- jects began the high—protein diet. Since constipation seemed to be so easily caused, each child was given a small amount of mineral oil on the first and second days of the preliminary period. The children were also kept out of doors in the fresh air and sunlight as much as possible. The meals were prepared and served in a separate room at the college. The menu and calculated value of the diet (Rose Handbook of Dietetics) are given in Tables III and IV. A three day‘s preliminary period on each level was followed by a three day collection period. During the last three days; duplicate samples of the daily Table II; Daily_§ppusr -_* __. Exp. I Exp. II Exp. III Approx.2gm.Prplkg.Aoprox.§gn.Perkg |_ in drox:4pm.Proikp. v Orange breakfast brange juice Orange juice juice Farina Cream of Wheat Cream of theat Cream ream Cream Sugar sugar Sugar Buttered toast Buttered tafst Buttered toast Milk “Willi L’Lilk l0:50 A.M. Oraxge jfiice Orange juice Orange juice Cod liver oil Cod liver oil Cod liver oil r p- -i __ ... _._.--,,r-__i-,- instead of soup. Ice cream or boiled custard int stead of baked custard. Peaches in custa instead of plain Spinach soup. Ice cream iScrambled eggs with tomato sauce. d Lunch Lettuce sandwich Lettuce sandwich Potatogpotuto b Red Buttered potatoes Buttered potatoes Meat with mcat I Scrambled egg Scrambled egg loaf ' Milk Milk Tom to juice 1 Peaches Peaches Lettuce & cottage' cheese sandwich i Milk Baked custard ' _..fi .- -.... --~.»--._.J 5 P. M. Milk Milk Milk Peanut butter sandwich a 1 I 1‘ 7 Supper Cre"med carrots Buttered carrots (Scrambled egg Thickened tomato Tomato juice 'Buttered carrots juice (liver Spinach puree 1Spinach extract) 'Baked custard Milk Baked custard Milk Peaches Variations Creamed potatoes Creamed carrots Tomato sauce tith in & buttered carrots&:buttered pota meat loaf. Preparation Iced tomato juice' toes. Tomato & Creamed carrots. , r‘ L?- 8. Lettuce vege- ! table and plain cheese sandwiches Spinach sandwichs Ice cream diet were kept for analysis. Pure fat and pure car~ bohydrate were eliminated from the sample for analysis. The e analysis portions were dried in the oven at a U) low temperature, ground and pulverized and reserved for chemical analysiS. The addition of liver extract to the low protein diet brought the very low iron value up to the re Hired amount. Spinach was used for this purpose on the medium and higher protein level dieteriee, since less OJ supplementary iron was needed an en extra vegetable was of added value. Since the filtered butter, cod liver oil, sugar, and corn starch were considered pure fat and carbohydrate, fu nisning only calories, they were not included in the sample to he used for analysis. The content of the low and medium protein diets was changed very little except in the amounts of the protein—rich foods, but several changes more made in the high protein diet. One half the milk used con— sisted of skimmed milk and the other half whole milk in order to keep the fat content at its normal level of thirty—five per cent of the total calories. Lean beef, finely ground, cottage cheese, and peanut butter were added to raise the protein value. In the first dietary, a whole grain cereal, Reldbns, was used be- cause it would aid materially in increasing the iron content. It was found, hovev;r, that the bran ... particles were not digested and aipeared in the feces, .. 4 interfering considerably with analysis. Cream of Wheat was used, therefore, in the medium and high protein dietaries. The additie a1 protein iceded to meet individual requirements ahove the basal allowance was in the form of egg white. Additional calories were made up with sugar. The urine and feces vere collected separately. A DJ aily record was kept of the volume, Specific gravity, acidity,(by the Folin method} and creatinine,(hy the Folin micro chemical method) content of the urine. The creatinine value indicated the accuracy in collecting 24 hour samples (15). The iaily samples were then com— bined, and further analyses were made on the three day portion. The nitrogen content of the urine was deter- mined by the Folin-Dennis micro Kjeldahl method and the amount of protein calculated. The feces were marked for collection by charcoal, civen to the sut- (W jects in capsule form on the morning when the col- lection period began and the evening when it closed. 3 The feces were washed in o c flask with 10 per cent I H?SO4 and gently boiled in this solution until com- pletely disintegrated. This solution was made up to volume and aliquot portions used for determining nitrogen according to the standard chldahl method. The caloric value of the food was determined by the oxycalorimeter (16). Dr. Amy Daniels and her associate workers (17) have made studies on the relation of the rate of growth of infants to diet. One of her conclusions is that the accepted standards of growth for infants are too low. In Table II the weight of each child used in this eXperiment has been compared with the accepted stanlards of the Baldwin-hood Tables (18) and the Holt and Fales tables (19). The variations from the normal weights according to age ranges from 11.9 to I -‘ o 18.5 per cent above these standards, ineicating that these children are juite overweight according to their ages. When the weights are compared with the heights, the range for the boys is 1.5% to 5.9 per cent and for the girl , E. J. is 16.5 per cent above the accepted value. E. J., however, was about average height, and was very solidly built. She was a very active child, but not of a nervous temperament. B. L. was a tall, slender, apidly growing boy. He was very active with a great deal of nervous energy. J. B. was chubby, fairly solidly built child, very deliberate in all of his actions. All three of the children were of average height or taller, therefore these figures coincide with Dr. Daniels results with younger children. ISL. 91.5. J .B. Therefore, Since these children were above the normal weight and height for their age group, the daily allowance of protein and calories was increased accord— ingly. The variations thus made are shown in Table I. That the children were growing rapidly is shown in the differences in their heights and weights at the first period and at the last. A typical, adequate, daily diet was selected for each eXperiment containing amounts to meet the needs of the lowest individual protein level and caloric requirement. Throughout the three eXperimen s, the energy intake was kept at approximately 80 calories per kilogram (2). The children were increasing in weight, therefore the total calories increased from experiment to eXperiment, but the proportion was kept constant. The analys1s sample is referred to in (‘0 section (1) of Table IV as the minimum individual ne d, and section (2) of the 33m: table gives the additions to this basal menu which were used to raise the caloric intake to the minimum amount needed by any one of the children. If these additions did not meet the reouire- ments, further additions of carbohydrate or protein were made as shown in section (5) of Table IV. It w's a bit difficult for the children to eat all of the food c*ivon them, especially at the evening mafia mmfisoawu m.mw :Hoponm wnpxm newsm.sm ON a means www.8m ow omma mmfinoawo wnpv .am 0. 0m campoum IXm means mmm. mam om mama meanoamo mm.om seasons mwnvxm 02 prmn madam 0¢ nflmponm wupxm umwam.sm m w means mmo madam ma mOOH mudnoamo macaw v¢.>m dampenm menuxm oz >£Jvflkh m :a .338 $0.40?on * g} .oond mmfihoawo En“. u d 5 -, nooaumoauoaao madam mnlqfiwaonm wuvxo human madam w Hmma mmwaoamo whpxwwWNwlnflmponm AmWSm memhw m was mean: www.msm ma mooaamoanOHmo assfi\¢¢.emuaampoam laws obonw mmnvxm oz mama nuanoawo madam mm afloponm coon anew [nae ebonw annexe oz m+dfipfleem Hagew>aenH Ann it .s .m .m .s .A .m modnoaeo.omwwoma mmwmmma m.¢ooa nonpno asaanaa L _ QH mmflhoado Haves Ham mew» moanoaao sum meanoaao «spam I m madam ma nonspm choo LL m m mammm:mn flaw nm>aq coo «a m an uaomm we “spasm ow om mamhm mm; gamma woos essHawz op maoapfieea Amv omen manwmma mmapoaao assfisfie a“ mmflhoawo mm.mmmx mm.m¢a mmmMMqu1WMflln masseseoppmo .paa . waxes rmqoa madam am.ao was .mEa , mm.om equm msenm same» nfimpoam Mama ‘Admon Hasea>aeqa asaasaev* eama mama mamnm omma v coon swap“ _ . no pawfimz Hapoa AHV Aoamm_amqv aquaqamnv doawmamqul nos Hoax 908 hoax amafihmmx EL mvdsmom 27 I to CO I meal, for the amounts did seem larger than those to which they were accustomed. Many ways were devised to make the meals interesting and full of fun. Small tables, chairs, and some of the dishes were brought to the apartment from the nursery school. A colored oil cloth cover was used on the table, adding both attractiveness and ease of recovering any Spilledgnrt- icles. The Spirit of competition was great. Even though E. J. was a girl, she "wasn't going to let a pair of boys beat her getting done". When individual preferences were learned, attempts were made to meet them. For example, J. B. much preferred his Spinach combined with the tomato juice and served in a cup to be drunk as a bouillon, whereas B. L. ate his much more willingly if it were served on his plate as a separate vegetable, and his tomato juice sweetened and served in his orange juice cup. Different colored glass cups were borrowed from the nursery school, but it was a delightful treat if one might drink his milk from a measuring cup. Ice cream, of course, was a constant request and delight. Any meal was a "party" if "pink" ice cream were the dessert. If some Special (D naughtiness arose, one of the children was moved to another table to eat alone, but when conversation was interesting, a meal would go quite rapidly. A story or account of some exciting adventure told by one of the adults who ate with the children would often mean that the children were finished eating before they (‘3 re lized it. They did not seem to tire eSpecially of eating the same type of food day after day, and only once did J. B. ask if "maybe by tomorrow won't we have all the tomatoes eaten up". The best of table manners could not be emphasized, but one mother told us, after the eXperiments were finished, that her only objection to what we had taught her son was that he still in- sisted on scraping the flowers off the dishes. After the food for each dietary was analyzed, the total intake for each child was computed, and the cal- culrted and analysis values were compared. This com- parison is shown in Table V. Analysis proved the cal— culated values to vary considerably from the levels planned for them. For example, the total daily protein content of the diet for J. B. in the first period was, according to the analys's figures, three grams over the daily protein according to the calculated figures. During the second and third periods, however, the analysis figure was five grams short of the amount .ofiopoeo mo pnosoanCoe pmmaaosm one was on; eaflno one om>Hm assess one on mpoommmmnoo 9H .mfiwhaoow pom moaosmm mpwofiaosc ow haflwp Umbom endosw one was com: Hwoefieflbafi Essfisws one * ommm damn ..a¢on 11. uses m .>4 .Hwo Haves coma heme mace see .Mfi _Hoo Hence mama Hema anma #mma wwoa #moa mma saw N m .>wv.Hwo pro *vmmn H soeba 1! HH.mNN :Hm.mmH : =m¢.wmd_ A! map m_poam.mW% ma.mm mo.mm mm.ma mesa m.z.mmg an.uw it «N.mm me.ae seeflpoum.wmq wo.NH mm.m ¢m.m awe—z mE§ me.HH mH.NH Hm.mar em~.m omm.m om¢.m Hmm.o me.m mew.m= .z mawpw mmms. bmms. wwnw. mmmm. mean. omom. Humm. wmwm. mamm. Nwoamswm tr m «o .>wV».a sHmH meH sHmH mama mmma mama mmmn mmma omNH omma omma omma poem nmmem.ms how a JHdn H we H 4 hem hoe how how now how hop how you new how how .>w cam cam pea .bw came cam and .bw on» com pmH HHH .mwm www.mxm * .mxm «memos Honowbavna ssswmwawowq campoum H R poem madam mo mamHHwaa mo1hpasmmm _> manoa SO Table VI Comparison of Calculated and Analvsis Figures :=:::.:§ "“:::-*"‘“" .:._:-L--‘~: kxp.Gms.Prot. . Calories I calc.Anal. calc. Anal u .L. 58 41.5 1585 _|e4§ I I 0.8. 38 41.5 :lBOl pisse i _§.;,]‘4o 44.8 il605_¥l651 ____ 1 1 A _ .ll__ ‘ IB.L. 51.4 52.2 1605 162'1 1 JLB.L57.4[52.2 11605 1622 7‘7 ‘ . E.J.geo.o 60.8 £1839 1335 i' :‘ n11 B.L. 82.5 78L8 1651 1668 J.B, 80.6 75.4 1625 166 ggg. 85. 84.4 172; 167 planned by calculation from Rose's (20) Handbook. Dr. Wang (12) reports this same situation during a study on high and low protein levels. She says, "this variation was due partly to the discrepancy between the publish- ed figures and the actual nitrogen content of the food as analyzed, and partly to the fact that some of the children refused to eat all of the amount planned". In this case, however, it may be said with confidence that each child ate all of the amount planned for him. A possible eXplanation of the variation is indicated in the analysis figures on egg white. Egg white was the only food in the diet to be analyzed separately for protein. It was done because it was used to supple- ment the basal or minimum individual needs (Table IV) in the case of E. J. and B. L. According to the analysis, the protein content of the egg white was 0.10694, 0.10450, 0.10778 gm. per gram of material. Rose gives the protein content as 0.1230 gm. per gram of material. On the first eXperiment, there were only 15 grams of egg white used, while on the second and third experiments, 50 grams and 40 grams reSpectively were required. By comparing the two values of egg white, the second and third periods would be lower proportionately in protein than the first, thus giving a possible eXplanation for the drop in the last two periods. Variations in the analyzed and calculated figures may have occurred in other foods of the diet as well as the egg white. In the determination of the caloric content of the diet by means of the oxycalorimeter, no difficul— ties were met in the analysis of the mixed sample of food. When the dried egg white representing the supplementary protein was run, however, it proved to be impossible to obtain complete burning of the sample. Even when 0.5 gram of egg white was mixed with 2 grams of sugar, the mixture charred rather than burned. This was due, it seems, to the excess of nitrogen gas formed when the high nitrogen material began to burn. Nitrogen gas does not support combustion and prevented the complete burning of the sample. Since the use of a smaller amount of egg white would allow for so great a percentage error, it seemed advisable, in order to obtain complete analysis results for the caloric value of the diets in which supplementary egg white had been used, to calculate the calories from protein and fat determinations. The protein value of the egg white used in the three reapective periods had varied so greatly from the figures given by Rose that it was advisable to do fat analysis of the samples, because in most foods that Cont in large amounts of protein, vhen the .rotein runs lower the fat tends ta run higher. This r J O was found ta hold true, although the FIW;; white used did not hrve rs high a fat Contrnt as Rose gives. The percent 5c” of fat in tne egg white were found to be 0.371, 0.086, and 0.065 respectiVely, as compared with Rose's figure of 0.2 per ceni. This value made the caloric value of egg white to be 0.434, 0.424, and 0.458 calories per gram for the three r (’3 m I pective periods, as comparrd with Rose's caloric v lue of 0.510 calories per gram. The shortage of protein and the fact th't J. B. and B. L. had colds during the first and second series: would account in part for the irregilcr continuity in the nitrogen balance that they have shown in Tables VII and VIII. B. L. and J. B. had rather slight colds at the beginning of the first experiment, tut they were C, quite well by the end of the three day preliminary period. During the seemnd experiment, however, E. L. ‘ had cad tr utle with constipftion and cold just before oeriod bcgfln. An enema during the ‘ the preliminary a neccsve 3, hut during the f“ preliminary period as collection period, he seemed ouite all rl :t. J. E. m 'D 0 showed signs of a severe cold on the ond day of the collection period durinr the second CXjOTiHEJt. During the third experiment, however, all thrre of the sutjects oo.ea mmo.o swam mm.m emmqg wmwmwmlmom. n ma quoa WWHH aqua e. H.HH mmo.o am.a oo.¢ Hnm.o omqmm;wmmqoaoq.aa wa.mm om w «mom .m Ho.» omqmwrnam o om.ma om.emmm w wwoa q 6.30.93 @Nmflqmm as a. HHH oozwamm z IIIIL .qmmmmwwao.o am.a ‘MN.¢ mon.o news mews“ osqm msqaa mm¢.o oeqm waqmm owbm ¢.Hw .e mo.H «co 0 mo.o ma.o was 0 am.m am.¢~ new» edwwM4M~«.o mm.m mo.m~ “WW m.ma .mww am.e amo.o amqo ma.H mamqo mews mnqwm Hews mm.mfl:www.o mmAm mo.mm mm m mqou .4. U A». a ma Hana ioaao.mun ea wwmuwMfiuuunfiunuuFuuuL .mqqmmWwwo.o moqa .mm.n .emwiommd.m ea.mm_mm.m .o afl.a an Hm om m uqoul.e.m ea.aa omo.o mm.o mm.“ Hma.o mm.m wmonawsmmqwxr Tunuqq¢wmqmaimm¢ma we N m.mH wmwmfi m.e mac 0 om.o am.a mam.o «m.m aa.mw_am.m .o am.m m.mH .q. a am as a as We a as an a II mass an em as am an as ma\am \.a .am \.sm us «a an a ma mM\sm \Em \sm Hmpoe proa Haves mooohloafihp wx\sm \3 .mx noapampom paqoso .z _ ampaH .2 meme .p: spam 1mm aH HH.~.uam mam.aaa¢14mmmm1mMn am an eon we swapoam .eu m H u moahmmqumwmm:mmuu HH> manda l . C C U C O O Q 0 C o , . . o . - - 7 - . ‘ . I I . I O O C I O U , , , 7 . .. . - u ‘ ' x t A . t O I I O I O U . |. . . -- — - . . . .. O a Q r . . . . A . I- . . O O O O O . - l . ' ‘ o . . . - . -— , - . a Q . l i r l ' a 1‘ O O O O O O O . 1 . i A n - — ~ .. _ - e - -. .. c . ‘ > . . C O O O O O I ‘. . ~ I ’ ' ‘ l . . l . . . . - . - -- o I o I u ' I : D o o o I o a . a t n . , - - — . , .— ~ . 8 . . . . o . _ . . o I . A I . O O O O ' O O I A .A - - i - . . . . - - o - l , V . x O C O O .0 O I . . . ) , . _ ,. - .- . - i . . i . , - I I . .n . . i . i. a D I O o O O O 0 . I . ‘ . . J A o - - ,_ ’ - . - .7 . . . . Q I § . ‘1 . I A ‘ ’ I i - . u < . .— ~- .. - . o v . . O 0 I I I O O i 1 . . x , h . l I n l . - - ,. a _ - » . .- _ . ‘ . I O o O O O O A ‘ w n o u 0 I 9 U I' , l illi|i HHH> magma mmo.o mm.a we.» mam.o HemmH om.¢m moo.o mao.o am.H wa.e mmm.o anw, m¢.mm mmwwo Nmo.o mo.a mm.m emm.o mo.m om.mww osmqo wmo.o an.H oo.a Hmm.m;mNa.oa imawmm ammqo aoo.o mo.o emwo maa.o sm.m Mm.¢m uquo were moqmm HH omo.o mm.o mm.~ Hmm.o mw.m mowed Hamqo mmo.o mm.a mm.m mam.o m~.oafl aa.mn «Hews amo.o em.o «saw mam.o me.s om.mm Noa.o omo.o om.o Hm.a mam.o aa.m .Lw«.mfl «em.o am.m mm.mH H .q.m \ws am as am .ps\ma was em Lag am .9: mm as am as ea maxam \am am mM\em \em imam \mmksm \am powpaopem pampdo dz camps cowumm .nnsm rt fl _ f L 1|. wwwno scam 90M monwamm Qumoppwz MOIHWmassm -57- were in excellent condition. E. J. had been in good health during all of the eXperimental periods. It was eXpected that, if the caloric intake were adequate, the nitrogen retention would be in direct proportion to the nitrogen intake (12). This proved true in the case of E- J., but with B. L. and J. B., the second period does not show a consistent increase over the first in the amount of nitrogen retained. Parsons (9) states that it is doubtful if a negative balance always means tissue destruction. He found that one of his subjects went into a negative balance during the time she had an infection of the upper respiratory tract. During the acute phase of such an infection, a patient is more or less toxic. Consider- able water may be bound in the tissues. Protéin, un— like carbohydrate and fat, requirwi ample "free" water for complete metabolism. If the free water is not available, the rezuired protein cannot be utilized and the stored nitrogen may be Spilled. Thus a negative balance may serve as a protective mechanism, just as refuhal of food by a patient may be a protective mechanism. The situation is different from a chronic condition where the patient becomes accustomed to functioning on less free water. DuBois (E) discussed this point from a somewhat different angle than Parsons. 0.)] O.) I 1 He state 'f 9 that “toyie destruction of protein" occurs in infectious diseases vith torem a, cancer, and other wasting illnesses. This condition m", Le prevented if a sufficient increase is made in the caloric int Ye, but th“t increas must be about diuble the number of calories actvally produced ty the fiftient's metabolism. Protein metabolisl i: usually elevated in seere in— fections and nitroren balance can be more easily L “ 1 obtained when the csloric int He is greatly increased. It is CLite possible that the colds that the lays had were not severe enough to cause any great variation .40 in protein metstolesn, but since their esloric intake (+- I H. C+ H ’1 was not raised above their norw:l rcoiiremen-; sible explanation for their C.) ”G O U) L.J ’1 F3 0 Q f—J “'5 :5 r+ .1 C) {”3 7T) :3 ' 1" The General inhiCafgon iron the refvlt? in Tables VII and VIII are that nitrogen retention is in direct proportion to the nitrogen infrke than the c:lories are adeouate; that i", on a higher level oi (‘3 such as 4 Grams per kilogram of rod: weight daily greater amount of niirsgeu rill Ft stored or ret fined is? the budy than +herr~vmnflx§lxecn1 ; gran? or a {r:ts of pretcin arr kilocrrn err egg. - - Dr. Fun” :33 her assaci‘tes (If) used c 4 — 12 years of age. those of the present stwdy i table. The results cited ar Dr. hang pM ces in her normal, The relation of her s seen in "I LA. e t?m)se of‘ vigorous clas fljldirlg S ‘to the following child whom It is (c U. can}; ‘ ‘np‘x‘n‘t‘a‘; “:1; “out an; ‘ ‘ ' RT? “W “$0251.156553 {smite} “(mm-L} 5‘“ ‘Ci—lzilELMLflid?4_-}lfl_ i ' how thigh Low idih Low 151%_% Infilewng high I s ’ l fi—j :DI‘. it .p t Eli—(23L *iCh: ‘ I page}. E 4;; ”as a; .511 _ . 50 9 v ._0.2__ 14341-5 E: 5 . 2.59 7 . g g; :2 .44 I a O 05 I 5 I t h 1 ‘Pre- :.Z44;.597h.c91|.52?..Oa6'.066 6.82fl4.0F ' sent to : 'to to to to ‘7232 77~BO q '11 . 346 c 8 Qt.n§ 2 . 2 .9?. . ‘ tggibzzto 1 M'fil‘ijefz’ O 45‘: -rO-g- fifl:4:'::':t154: :92th ::.::.’L:.:.: :.- _- interesting to note, however, that this child at 5 years of age is i PI 3 of 4 to 5 years used in thi n study . weight than the children Children of the pre—school age are facing a long period of re )id growth, nitrogen as possible to make and successful. Result view of Dr. the ones used do not appear on children when the criteri behavior, and relation betwe the children seened in the b and physically during the la the process to have any a used are an intake est condition st and output, period when the and need as much reserve efficient study confirm the hang (12) that protein diets as high as harmful effects appearances, for hoth mentally diet con— -40- teined the largest amount of protein. It would seem logical therefore to recommend a higher level of protein intake for children of pre-school age, rather than a lower level. Summqu afld Conclusions: 1. ~»..—-—.—-.._...—. The accepted standards of growth for children of the pre—school age are too low. Nitrogen retention varies in direct proportion to the nitrogen intake when the calories are adequate. An indication of a lower nitrogen retention on a higher protein level may be due to the discrepancy between the calculated values according to pub— lished figures and the actual analyzed values of the diet. This variation is also found in the caloric content of the diet. A condition interfering with general metabolic processes, such as a cold, will affect the nitrogen retention, tending to reduce it. As high a level of protein as 4 grams per kilogram of body weight per day does not appear to have any harmful effects on rapidly growing children of From 3 - 4 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight are to be recommended for children of the pre-school age rather than lower levels. 7. At least 80 calories per kilogram of body weight per day are to be recommended for active, normal children of 4 - 5 years of age. BIBLIOGRAPHX (1) Hawle , E U. S. Dept. Agr., Tech. Bul. g) Y - 2 1 — so, (1927) (2) Holt, E. and Fales, B., A. J. D. C. £;,(l) l - 29 (1921) (5) DuBois, Basal Metabolism in Health and Disease (4) Gillett, L., N. Y. Assoc. for Improving the Condition of the Poor, Pub. 115 (S) Sherman, H. C., J. B. C. 31 77 - 109 (6) Holt, E., Food Health and Growth 01 o ’ (7) Newburgh, L. H., Arch. Int. Med. g2, 850, 192 fig, 682, 1925 (8) Holt, E. and Fales, H., A. J. D. c. gg_(4) 871, 1921 (9) Parsons, J., A. J. D. c. §;_(6) 1221, 1930 (10) Gephart, F. G., Boston Med. and Surg. Journ. 176, 17, 1917 (11) Fleming, G- B. and Hutchinson, H. 8., Quart. J. Med. fig, 589, 1924 (12) Wang, c. C., A- J. D. c. gs (6) 1161, 1928 (15) Sherman, H0 C., Chemistry of Food and Nutrition, 3rd Edition. (14 Rose, M. 8., The Foundations of nutrition (15) Wang, c. C., A. J. D. 0. £2 (6) 560, 1926 (16) Benedict, F. G. and Fox, E. L., J. Ind. and Eng. Chem. _1_(9) 912, 1925 (17) Daniels, 1., A. J. D. 0. £1 (6) 1177, 1929 (18) Baldwin-Wood Tables, American Child Health Assoc- iation (19) Holt, E., and Fales, B., Science of Nutrition in Infancy and Early Childhood (20) Rose, M. 8., Laboratory Handbook for Dietetics, 5rd Edition 1 ' X. "‘ ‘t‘:‘ l! .' 'r. ', .. 3 .. .5" - 3&3 a ‘ 33,512???" .299 $312719 ‘ n ' I I 1“}: " M . -' I. ' J. C $_ .A ‘1'}‘1" .9 '- . 1"," J'g\4".‘ v .1!” _ ’h ' {3%} fl“; . «L. , '3 07"}: ‘ sf ' ' “’1: ffifn‘a". .V -‘ 2‘ :6.) flight,» "#:1121319 31w, 1‘. 0 W.“ ' *i-‘r L, 3. h, V‘ & E 57. ((5‘15.:\?',(‘31'J~'i1' wt”: . , ’7 ”’ "'5‘" \ ' .'. [34'- my 7 ‘1' t '31 . ‘ (5 ‘Fv'fk‘rm " v ‘g . - n‘ f. - - I 'I . a. . .:_’l. l" .' ”I, ' . ' , _ ' '- “ § '. 'fig. ;‘*$' '3’. '*>. 1.)“? \’.Q‘.” U 1" 3, ' ‘I‘X’J‘. ~'¥ ‘ I) .'.~‘ .5 u. . V ”I" """' 1:» t“ "u': :1. ' - '1'7'13.” "" . ' ‘ 9.. . é‘ . . : 1. 91“: r :u . "w_' . 6.1 Ink.” ‘ )‘hl‘l ' w .c,‘ ‘ . .t. .' ‘ ”a, ‘. ID. '3 ‘I Q l - ' ‘ ”‘3; ’1‘.R,r""-’. 'O‘c“ .‘fi 'f i-‘,“v ‘5’) " ~:JI- “£"‘. ‘.~' 1’ . ‘- . ,,_ H - J" , . n“ 1...}. ‘1". ,_\H \. - 913’» . 1 1 1‘ ,o‘v\'_|‘ “A «\‘N‘.( H mp.” . . . . 1 ‘ ’3" (’11.. Lt; .1 (Db-h") ‘ ‘ 1‘» " ‘0' «.5119 WV: ., ‘15} .2. .‘ha‘bhfir‘ts‘ig . ' . ‘ . V .. ’ , “i r . (:3 ,‘. .1 ..-’ " 1.1-1"]h'.‘ . .IV ,- '2" ‘ ‘ .I I 3". ’15 f T” ‘ . .0 ” "‘l~s-, 1 . .’J:‘. .3? t\0".“ fly Yr-“f‘;.' 1 '._'%. - , . ..;\¢.;~ 1 2:, ., W1 ,0, fificgafidwv“..J.‘;}l‘y, A ' . . \ ’ . . . . -r-- 12‘". a '-" :1 .j‘ "r ' vr'?‘ ‘1‘.) fi‘lééfu v . , . . ' ‘ ‘ '. . o “‘ ‘.d. 'H ' ‘0 ‘ I-. j. ' . . I. -«' - .‘ ' W ' I -' "- “‘1‘". . | 'I I ‘ ,0 .I '1 ‘ I :31; (m. , ..' 1‘, gr» .4 ‘s- .1 -- - ' e ‘ . ‘ a r")? I. ‘ " '. ’ ',.¢'_. {fuia ‘ ' W. Y .(‘cl‘i' . , ~° 9.‘ “I, ‘2'). . " .-“j. ,n . 4.7“," 4. ‘, o ': . ‘W ("00' 5"”), $53. " ‘ ‘ -"‘ ‘ ‘ -‘ " . s .l.. 2 \ ,'.-‘I._' .‘.‘ ‘ I! , "n. ‘1'? (. .' ‘i' “ m. (‘ 5' ' :4 ’ v 1).. \'o ' 5 r". . wr-s‘» e 1- .-.- (1'1. M.‘ , .- ‘ ‘ ‘ ’ 'V .' A - > ’n -' ‘ ' - 0.. J“, ‘ . e 'f I ‘ ‘ ', ”3 N ’ .‘11 - ‘ 2 k V)“, , .v‘ V 0’ .n ‘2‘“ 1“".2‘: It I" .‘f' ‘3' : . : v)" ' to! -. .J A. C H g .; "$-“ ., .- 4_ ..‘ . ‘1’- .‘ ' A 'n )1 ' '.. 233;"! ’1 O." t' ,q ‘C . \ . . ¢ ." 0 ~ ' ¢ ‘. ._ ‘ . . ' 1 Q’» ' :1 :l‘: '3‘, " ‘H '.’. t.J-A‘ i‘f‘ “(IT-”Wm. $.J {Quit ' ‘ I A " l ‘ I I 1" I - . 1 -N - ' I! ”31‘. , . 2111?. I, Sit“ ‘ ‘ 1” .‘k"\ 1.: ‘ "'L 3" ‘1) ~ til“. . ,1?" {’2‘ u.‘ - ‘ ' ‘ my MW“- 4 9. . ' 4". , . .. J‘.>.'\.l.’ 5‘. 1K! ' 2'1“" .\' 3". i " ('lo'.“"££.’;"5 ’3‘.‘ '2 I“ . '1. , ‘-. t .. (y . . ‘ v _,’ 1' i... . 2"'?~'-.-.- IS. 414;?“ . “-I""1"5.'2'5\:4LJ)¢‘--'r'.""}-2_'.-)-':. ;: . . ‘ I i" {1‘23C‘die’ d {\Y-fl.‘ V‘ .fi‘;q<$:1’:§ ”N" "t. n . 2‘ net - ~32. 3-1-- -. 1 . mt 1N}: w: 719...: hr?» :8 ‘t' ‘1.-*« ’34.:7-3’- -. 1 1' “-‘v‘ w -‘-“ . ' . . ' . . ‘ “ , . ‘ ‘.. .‘. .. . ‘ “ a ‘;‘;I'l\. ‘21‘ ".- ° ~\' "’ ‘ 0“ ' .."‘.'I ' ‘ 5 -. .. v- ‘ ' 0‘“ "." ._"‘U A . . in . ._ ‘f‘! ‘ i J l , . . _ ",&i ‘1‘ r": 4‘"! b”|?.1“.‘qut.\ '.I ft'/‘~‘. (”2“ V“... ‘:7*‘.?x=‘«.1'.-wML" ’4 “I: "r """ I " e .. «f {1%. -.,.,,.' x-n ‘. h’fivhfl‘fi'k. ‘t‘ .‘FII~I"“AI. . i“."“1.-a‘ 169 0633 ill l l l l l Ill ll lllI ll Ill Ill llll Ill ll Ill l l l l l Illll' 'l l l l l l l l l l l 3 1293 O3 ummmumi