A PROPOSED HIGHWAY UNDERPASS FOR THE MICHIGAN AVENUE RAILROAD GRADE CROSSING IN JACKSON. MICHIGAN Thai: for H1. Beam of 3. S. MICHIGAN STATE COLLEGE him Ed. Ryan I949 THESIS In L; A Proposed Highway Underpass for the Michigan Avenue Railroad Grade Crossing in Jackson, Michigan A Thesis Submitted to The Faculty of MICHIGAN STATE COILEGE of AGRICULTURE AND APPLIED SCIENCE by John Ed. Egan Candidate for the Degree of Bachelor of Science June 1949 TthIS 0’. / To My”Wife Without whose encouragement and understanding I would never be in the position to write this. ACKOWILEDGLMT The author wishes to express his thanks and appreciation to the folowing faculty members for their advise and cooper- ation in making available textbooks and material used in the design of this underpass. - Mr. Nothstine - ass't-prof., Civil Engineering, Mb.C. Mr. Miller - prof., Civil Engineering, MS.C. Mr. Rykeman - inst., Civil Engineering, M.S.C. He also wishes to thank the following men for making avail- able the maps from which this thesis was planned. Mr. Fry - City Engineer, Jackson, Michigan. Mr. Brisbin - _Div. Engineer, New York Central Railroad. June, 1949 John Ed. Ryan LS. rv N-r‘o'"; --.- .mu ...2‘ ‘ ‘fi’ “-0-5. -%- ~‘ "A. impf-tr .x. . ‘ , _ . ~. V.a4.-_.....-“’ \-'.' \W.CV""‘ v ' v-9: " ‘ ' ' ..»1“ - ‘ ,-o ‘- \ _. V ~—-' N -_ ‘ - o ,a.’ '4‘ _,.._’-" --.\‘ Mc“- vv ""‘ - "' ‘4 - ~ " ‘ ' -—. ‘ ’ \J 5 -~ — .. . \ . ‘ F I l l ' . . ; "H'l’fiucm-Wm" . “awn-M p- - A. m. .n- \‘p‘s—M‘ \‘_ INTRODUCTION Due to the vast amount of railroad traffic and also the even larger volume of automobile traffic that must have a rightaway between Milwaukee and Columbus street in The Middle of Jackson Michigan and due to the economical im- possibility of raising the tracks above their present grade an under-pass for the street is the only solution. The ‘ possibility of such a pass has been discussed for many years. Nothing has ever been done about the sitution how- ever. The most important reason for this is the fact that _ too much valuable property would be ruined should the whole street be dropped below the present grade. As far as the author knows the design offered as a compromise to the situation is original. It is believed that such a prod ect would not only relieve the traffic situation but also do very little dmage to the value of the shuting' property. The underpass suggested here-in ennsists of dropping the two middle lanes of the street and leaving the two out-_ side lanes at the present level thus leaving access roads to the abuting property. The entire length of the proJ ect would be seven-hundred and sixteen feet long. Such a length would allow a grade of less than 8% at both ends of the project. This grade is relatively steeper than is recommended in most designs but is well within the maximum range as specified by the Michigan State Highway Dept. It is also less than several grades already existing in the city. The design will of necessity include suggestions for rerouting a main sewer which now exists in the area, design of a bridge to carry the railroad and one to carry hilwaukee Street over the depressed road. Due to the fact that very few persons ever use that section of Columbus Street between Michigan Avenue and Pearl Street it is not thought necessary to provide a a crossing at this location. If such crossing was provided it would be necessary to carry the underpass for a distance of two-hundred and fifty feet beyond the intersection and in-“ - to the already congested area between Cooper and Francis Streets which would also bring it into higher-valued sections. A plan view of the proposed prod ect is shown on the following page. M//a/auic‘6‘57‘ 5/"!de J,d¢wq/,é / v ‘ ‘ g/"a; e 502/2)“ __ 0'.‘ III - L... I AAWIHIWAI -,-,I. III! - II j“) MOW/5H II IIIIIIIII II IIMVAHGNnIWfiIfi IIHTI .I. Jzn’n 39/1» y i \ \ \ 'l- I / ._\ \ -Mmm Lel- lyl- his \\‘\ o . ' I C I I I I I I —. v. ‘ h“-- ." .______._..___.i\ 2 I I I I I I I I I .2 he _ I _ E—.‘ I ‘— ‘ II- — ——d— I--. —---_— ~—_~-~-‘ SEWER,RELOCATION Due to the fact that there are no natural grades to relocate the sewer around there are many possioilities to consider in changing the sewer system to make way for the underpass. It is thought that the relocation as suggested in red on the sewer map is the best. (See map in back) #2 manhole is moved to the north to the center of Van.Dorn Street and the sewer (24" U.P.) is swung to it from."l..A new manhole is located on the south side of the main street and a 12" V.P. sewer is connected directly to. the #4 manhloe. No other change in this run is then necessary as the present sewer will take the flow. From.the relocated #2 a 36" concrete sewer is run to Pearl Street and thus to #9 . #4 manhole will be moved west about twenty feet . The present sewer crossing Michigan.Avenue at Columbus st. is ten feet below the surface grade. This is sufficient as the elevation of the underpass will be only six feet lower than present grade at this point giving enough frost pro- tection. Two new manholes will have to be constructed to Join the two 12” VkP. secondary sewers and they will both then flow into #8 and thus to #9. The present large sewer between Milwaukee and Columbus Streets will be needed to carry the drainage pumped to it from.the underpass. DnsIGN or nu Lemmy Theroad way of the underpass shall be constructed as shown on the following page. Except where necessary for con- struction purposes the grade will not be excavated below the bottom of the waterproofing slab and will then be backs filled with gravel and compacted. A.three inch slab of conf crete will then be poured two inches below and over the tOp of the wall footing. This slab will then be waterproofed by the best methods available preferably with cement grout. Iiight inches of gravel will then be placed over this slab and the roadway shaped with a crown of three inches at center. The wearing surface shall be of placed 3000# concrete at least six inches thick and designed to take the full H920 plus impact loading. The grades leaving the underpass shall begin clear of the bridges and extend for two-hundred and fifty feet to the present road level. The lowest elevation of the grade will.bngust west of the Milwuakee Street bridge where adrain will carry the drainage water to a dry well out- side the wall. Electrically driven sump pumps will carry the sewage from.the well to the newly relocated number four men- hole. The motors of the pumps will be elevated above the *water table and housed in a special manhole. Open tile drains at least four inches in diameter will cries-cross under the middle third of the under pass to carry any seep- age through the water proofing to the dry well. Gutters at least six.inches wide will be provided on both sides of the roaduay. The two lanes will be separated by raised buttons along the middle line and the center line will be painted QNVTQW \Wrxwan \QQ\\\0QQ\ mfixoxxw E mecmkrsoxm. \ I \%.\Q Mano lmMookowo 3m \woo KS o\.\ .. . .. :H: I e}... L\ .VINV WW..." ‘V\.\\..m...~:. \\\I\TII\\\ H\\\.MH\\\MI.H..\hu an .\ \\\ \W\Q0 3, if!" ~J ‘r’ '3 L.’ V r ,r'. '/ _‘_"_(_ _______,»/ K ’ /-J;.L;‘;.z_ 2 “ 4. Ewe/new m5 ///£r//H//5///;: /// SUE/U S/fl };///~:/// SUNS/ZN; E/H7S/I Due to the impossibility of delaying the railroad traffic even for a half day some method of construction must be devised for supporting the tracks during the construction period. The following method is suggested. The bridge for #1 track will be constructed first. All switching for which this track is used will be done from the other two tracks. First a row of 112-32 piling will be driven between the #1 and #2 tracks and at a distance of eight feet from the cen- ter line of the #2 track. This will give the required clearance for the trains. ( See sketch above) A row of similair piling will be driven fifteen feet east of the center line of the 1513 track. #1 track will then be removed and the earth excavated to a depth of six feet. One and three-quarter inch tie rods will be driven under the two trm ks. As each ten-foot length is driven another section will be attached with a suitable sleeve.Eight rode on five-foot centers will be needed. They will be driven through holes burned in the piling and will be held to grade and line as close as possible. After all are driven a 12"-CB section is to be driven each side of each rod on the east side to act as an anchor. A washer will then be placed on the rod and a nut drawn up. Similiar wales will then be placed on the ..west side. The remaining excavation under track 71:1 can then be excavated and the bridge and abutenents constructed with- out danger of the other two tracks failing under load. After track #1 is completed and ready for use all the through traffic can be routed over this bridge by means of existing switches while the other bridges are constructed. The construction on the Milwaukee street bridge and the rest of the project can be carried on at the same time . Counterforts will be provided at that section of abut- ment where the bridge girders rest on the wall. An extra _ pile will be driven directly under each girder to take the excess load due to the bridge. SYMBOLS AND FORMULAS USED L.L. :b Live load D.L. 2 Dead load Z ; Section.modulus fs ; .Allowable stress in steel fc : .Allowable stress in concrete t ; Thickness h ; Height T ; Tension C : Compression Value of welds. Specifications Length of welds required. Streess in pounds / value of welds used Resisting moment : T ;,C . Moment / 2 x.h Safe area for bearing Load / safe bearing pressure. wli 410.0” l I l I 256' AjotL // " 5 ' 1:1 // - é" _ GENERAL LAYOUT OF RAILROAD BRIDGE GIBDLERS , FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS k 36 72 72 72 72 16.846.34.184“ 36 72 7272 72 «3468 46.9468 290673 ‘luli'l .5: 5'91; 91-5'16' .J' 8' ‘3' if} .0" 6' 6’ ‘6' 8', J H-72 LOADING SPECIFICATIONS 1 410' , 1 ’1" 410': , 4-o"_ r I 'II Min. spacing 4 1/15 of span c? Min. depth beam :0 1/15 of Span. L I 1 Loading ' fi/ftcu '—1f Dead-steel 1480 ”3’ bit. 150,‘ track 200#/ft 8(0" “4 620” ‘ ‘ §° 1 ,1 r ‘0 J _, .c N Live load iii-72 2‘ N Impact ' lurch 20 56 vertical ~. ‘ ' 100-0.60L ) I ~ A ‘9 Axial Tension. ‘ I ‘ 189000 #/3Qofto 8 23 ' géé' .r-a” git“ :Ffle in /610” r wag n Dead load _325#/ft ‘ ' Live load 19-72 4' " 72k“ :74, I ”724'! t 1 3:1 , ”flhfigafi 2'6 2’4 Maximum Moment 1 1 k. Live load 87750 *5! | y 825 Lurch (20%; 17550 " Impaot(805 70200 " Dead load 5750 " Total 181250 5:; 2175000 "f - , *Vrfl l I I | I Section modulus req'd. D.L.Moment 120.8 cu.in. Use- 14"WF84# rolled beam - Z 3 130.9 M / / 17/////1 Shear Maximum shear 144600 7} FLOOR BEAM 1117 117 LIIIILJ Deadload 600#/ft. I I/ Live load E-72 k //-6 . 1. 31575” 57" geek," 72:72 5,5: Use 20% for lurch effect added to one side and ' subtracted from the other (I r--Z--!'—7—- Haximum Moment L176 load 237000 '# | I I Dead load 84_00 " LLW / Total 245400 7 # 3" 2944800 "v Section Modulus req'd. ‘ ' 16305 cu.in. Use 215W96# rolled beam 2.; 168 cu.in. lat/J] / /4I[//// Maximum shear 144600 # J GIRDER TYIITIJLIJITFZIIYILIT E 4010” T 4‘ I 36" 72k 724* 468 46.3 4”} 8' .mzw’ 9' v 5,] v i l . (a? wig HHIH H Illinh L.L. MOMENT , 44‘ .._1HIIJJHIHWIHHJ J 30.1.. MOlfllNT /////////////// i‘ / ’ 8m mower. LINE Dead load 1000 #/' Live lead E-72 liaximumMoment ‘ Live load 1186000 'at' Lurch 237200 " Impact 948800 " Dead load 200090 " Total 2572000 '# 5 30,864,000 "# Section modulus req'd. _-_ 1045 cu.in. Use 36"WF300# rolled beam Z _-_ 1105.1 cu.in. Maxim shear ;-_ 244000 # - t .."‘n f v- 0'4 ‘ STRINGHI CONNECTION 12.03” “5 ii— —-r_r———“'§O_P 4 t "—3 n 2 ' e s .. 478 8’ 2 :1. 04:0 , \ <—' §~ I \ \ 0.46; ‘ N W , } ll'r ll _LLMLLT ’ U: fwd / H7 . 1 LA 2,2,4. /2" 2 Shear ; 144600 7% Value of 3/8" fillet weld 5000 #/sq.in Value of 1/2" fillet weld 4000 #lsq.in Length 1/2' weld req'd. _-_-_ 36.15 in. Use a 6"x6"x1/2”x12" angle for seat reinforced as shown with 1/2" plate. Weld all around. Homent ; 2175000 2.} '1' z 0 = 2175000 ; 155000# Length of 3/8" weld req' d. 2 155000, _-_ 26" 3000x2 Value of 3/8” plate 9"1ong :. 60800 Value of 1" plate 9" wide ; 162000 Use a 1" thick plate cut as shown and welded with 3/8" fillet weld as shown. TL—__J jg \ . 00 an... Jflw 6 ,. (fr f/J d «c A a . o m )3 ”a ,2, /4_ a j 0 \ m\ \ a .so 0 \_\ o l. l. . @ re r 6 #0 G rox re 0 re {0 V‘s : QJ.‘ {QU \. avm\\..m\r - nuksuww. L0R\\Vm. Cé ll wtmtak howbaax Damask 1/4” f, €7//2 BIBLIOGhAPHY 1* Civil Engineers Handbook -- Merriman and Wiggins‘ 2- Highway Engineers Handbook -- Harger and Bonney 3- Reinforced Concrete Design Handbook American Concrete Institute 4- Reinforced Concrete -- O'Rourke 5- Reinforced Concrete Design -- Sutherland 6- modern Steel Structures -- Grinters/ 7- Steel Construction Handbook --.A.S.C.I. e‘\.) Q Q‘O q. "3 0 '2 U .3. .5EWfR MAP» JACKSON, M/C/r’ GA RAO£ (2 a) a; (:) I 57‘) W / 4C? ,/ /¥4' 27? GAR/AGE 1 [W000 mask the, a a CC kn rams assets is omy QWDWNS 5 n s... dd LPAV IJHI HDDN [afghNWLHW 5' 2.5.5.35. m 12.55,. LN 00 he. 5 3m! J w W)? GROCLQ %n\0\Nm\.NQ\\fi 1 A c$¢m\\.\ Hawk. prnxQ \\ 504 \tuxxou \. C 1 OTH/f exam