GEODESICS IN 3-SPACE THESIS FUR THE DEGREE OF M. A. John ‘William Zimmcr 1933 ( Yc’aggwoozdfi Er \ MSU LIBRARIES .—:,—. RETURNING MATERIALS: P1ace in book drop to remove this checkout from your record. FINES wi11 be charged if book is returned after the date stamped below. GEODESICS IN 3-SPACE A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of MICHIGAN STATE COLLEGE of AGRICULTURE AND APPLIED SCIENCE In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by John William Zimmer 1933 ACKNOWLEDGMENT To Doctor James Ellis Powell whose suggestions and help are responsible for this thesis. i.(}:3€3&§!3 INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS I. GEODESICS AS AN ORDINARY PROBLEN OF THE CALCULUS OF VARIATIONS lo 2. 10. Statement of the problem Euler's equation The Weierstrass-Erdman corner condition The necessary condition of Weierstrass The necessary condition of Legendre The necessary condition of Jacobi Sufficiency conditions Geodesics on a sphere An illustrative example An illustrative example; the pseudo sphere IIo GEODESICS; A PROBLEM OF LAGRANGE 1. 2. 3. The Lagrange problem The problem of finding geodesics The equations of the geodesics The transversality conditions Normality of the extremals Analogue of the Weierstrass condition (OmKIUIIbCfiOJ 12 13 15 16 BO 20 20 25 25 27 7- The Clebsch condition 8- The necessary condition of Mayer 9. Determination of conjugate points 10- Sufficient conditions for an arc to be a geodesic 11. Application to a sphere 12. Application to a cylinder III. AN INVERSE PROBLEM 1. The inverse problem of the calculus of variations 2. The problem.of Beltrami IV. AN ISOPERIMETRIC PROBLEM 1. Statement of the isoperimetric problem 2. The problem of Minding 3. The necessary and sufficient conditions 4. Application to a plane 5. Application to a sphere BIBLIOGRAPHY 28 28 29 31 32 34 36 36 37 50 51 54 55 56 58 INTRODUCTION We shall define geodesics as curves of shortest dis- tance on a surface. That is, a geodesic is a curve on a sur- face such that the distance between two points measured along it is less than the distance measured along a neighboring curve joining the two points. The problem of finding geodesics is then a problem of the calculus of variation. We shall show that the definitions usually given in metric differential ge- ometry are necessary conditions that a curve be a geodesic according to our definition. They are not always sufficient. It is not the purpose of this paper to give all the properties of geodesics that have been discovered. In the bibliography will be found a list of papers giving these prOp- erties. we shall confine ourselves to a discussion of these properties that can be derived by the methods of the calculus of variations. In part I the problem is set up as an ordinary problem in the calculus of variations. Necessary conditions and suf- ficient conditions are given for a curve to be a geodesic. The results obtained are applied to several examples, including the sphere and pseudo-sphere. In part II the problem is treated as a Lagrange problem. In part III an interesting inverse problem connected with geodesics is considered- The problem is to find 1 all surfaces on which the geodesics can be represented lin- early in u and v. Part IV is a discussion of the isoperi- metric problem of finding curves of shortest distance join- ing two points A and B and enclosing with a given curve, joining A and B, a given area. I GEODESICS AS AN ORDINARY PROBLEM OF THE CALCULUS OF VARIATIONS 1. statement gfuthg,problem- The equations of our surface S are taken in the Gaussian form X=X'(a, V), (l) S. y any (a, V), 2' ext“, V), We shall assume that IMHO, ytum) and It“. v) have as many derivatives as necessary to carry through the analysis. We shall also treat only those surfaces for which A”: EG‘FZ is everywhere different from zero?' The length of a curve joining two points on S is given by the integral (2) iufizrv’wv" d“ - H‘ The problem of the calculus of variations, then, is to find among all admissible arcs joining the points 1 and 2, one which minimizes the integral (2). Such curves we shall call geodesics. We shall discuss the necessary con- ditions and sufficient conditions that a curve be a geo- desico a! L-Po Eisenhart, Differential geometry 9; M and, m, p. 71. (Hereafter referred to as Eisenhart.) # x. Eisenhart, pp. 220-221. 2. mlgr's gguationo With the function 7‘ in the form given in (2) the Euler equation (3) i fv' "fv " fv’u *fv'VV'*fv‘v' V’I-fy =0, becomes I ,3 2(EG-F‘)V’ 46%.? +3F§-§ -2F§-§ 433-5” 6 C '3! F 5' 11 (4) 143ng +25}; +2F§-§-G;—7 -E§—§ -4;§-; -6§;—,)V E” +0535- rzrgf mg; 45’;- -2;§§)v’ F’ 35' Eli _ -r£!£?§h:‘-/7§;: -£:55;-C9J which may be written in the form v" 116355 *Fagff ”22%)V’3 35‘ II +[(§%;‘-+F%5‘Z‘f{)‘ ”5517 F591" 2h" 2/!" (5) +{2(Ei?£ ’F-aaf) "(63%; +F§~§ -zr§;f]y’ 2/" 2H‘ F a: at _ +[ng2 ‘éjza‘: ‘f-a—pl—O. Expressing (5) in terms of Christoffel symbols of the second kind we get v”- {2.2} v” + (12.21 - {24) v" +0422] _, [1,1])1/ +[Izl] =0, Geodesics are defined by means of (6) in metric differential (6) geometryfg Since we have shown that Euler's equation reduces to the form of (6) for our problem the ordinary definition of a geodesic becomes a necessary condition. In other words, a curve on the surface must satisfy (6) before it can be a geodesic. This condition, however, is not sufficient. We shall call solutions of equation (6) extremals. 3. figflgierstrags-Erdmann garner gongitignf’ A corner is defined to be a point on the geodesic at which V" is discontinuous but has a right and left hand limit. We shall define admissible arcs as those arcs that are continuous and have only a finite number of corners. If the geodesic has a corner (u,v) the Weierstrass-Erdmann cor- y- Eisenhart,p. 205. * G-A. Bliss, Calculus g£_Variations. p. 143. (Hereafter referred to as Bliss Io) ner condition says that (7) fV’( a) V, V,<‘¢‘O)) st’(“.a\/; V’(“+0))p using F: V! +2FV' +6.14 , (7) becomes FfGVL __ FfGV’ (a) —, -, - ——-L, . . yE f2/V— *GVL V?f2f¥*f6Wf If we square both sides of (8) and then multiply both sides by (5' and. + 6 V93)(E f2FV—’ 4- G v:’) we get [5/1 + 25%: v; rta’ Vf + 2/3 v1 HGI‘ V; v! ( ) zrcavf v1} +;'c v.11 * “'6”: v:1 +e3w} yd] = 9 [zzrc y.’ + zs‘vc' +1 F’vl 4'1}cm v; v.’ + 2:6' v,’ vi“ I I I3 -F’G v,” + 2rc'v,’ v.’ + c v,‘v.] , Equation (9) reduces to (10) H2(V1*V-')[2F+6(V1+\L’)]=o Equation (10) can be zero when (11) V,’ = v.’. , 01' (12) 2F +6(v;+v.1)=o. From (12) we find that V! nary; ran" = VI+2FVI {-61/1' and Fiat/1 = —(F*6'V1) . Therefore (8) becomes (13) -(F+GV.’) -' L" 6", V£*2FV,’ +614“ VE+ZFVH6VF ° From (12) and (13) we have that V.’ = V..’ :. 'Z'é: . .Hence we conclude that a geodesic can not have corners. 4. The necessagy condition 9; Weierstrass."L Let Gabe a geodesic. The necessary condition of Weierstrass is that for every (:4, saw) of 6,3 the function (14) [Nana/'1") =-' {(“.V.V')-ftu.m/’) -(V'—V')Fv'(u.v.v') I must be greater than or equal to zero for every (M,V.V)*(“.WV). For the present problem (14) becomes _ hr:- rams-r9 V: r zrvv 6V”" (l5) {heart/7 = V£+2FV96VR - VfrZFv'fG'v" which may be written as (16) [(u’Ky:V') g [EanZQGV‘ ZE+2fw+€V7 —/£’+(V9-W)/*6WVJ f V'rGV' ' Since the denominator of the right hand side of (16) is the expression ford.» , and is always taken to be positive, we need only to show that *31183 I p0 1310 V’Z‘V'4'5‘V'i IEH’FV’itgw' ’/ E + (VLV’IF' HS‘v'V'. (17) V{ I +(V'—V')F+ cwvy“ If we write the right hand side of (17) as and express the left hand side as a single radical, we may then compare the two radicands. We get [5V"*fF‘V'V’ +£6w'7/ (18) 2E6wV‘+ V"; up... 7'. WV“. Setting h” = [G-F" we may write (18) as (19) (;1*//ajvl‘+#/3y’ V’*(F‘+l/‘)V"7/ 2(F‘fh")wV’. V’V" .zrw-V'. Me, which reduces to (20) H‘tw-V’NO- We have shown that for every V'i’ V’ , E(¢-,V,Vj V970 everywhere on our surface. The Weierstrass condition is, therefore, not a condition on the minimizing curve at all. p 5. The necessary condition gkaegendre- The Legendre condition states that if 611 is a geodesic then at every (my, v') of 6'” the condition (21) {WW ( a, V, V')’,0 *BliBB I, p‘ 1310 must be satisfied. For our problem (21) is £‘6’—/7‘ (22) fyoyl = (E f-ZF'V’+ G 51")?! H2 (5 arw. swat ' Therefore fr'y' > a everywhere on the surface. Hence Legendre's condition places no restriction on the curves that can be geodesics. 6. 1h2,necessary condition 9; Jacob ?' If we con- sider the single infinity of geodesics through the point 1, and if this family has an envelope, then the geodesic can have no contact point 3 with the envelope between 1 and 2. For, by the use of the envelope theorem the com- ;* posits are 6”, +34, f 6-,, = ,1- But.an is not a geodesic and may be replaced by an are which is shorter than 1),, . This would give the composite u Bliss I, p. 141. 10 are 6,, +D” v- 6,2 a smaller value than the geodesic 6,: . In every neighborhood of 6,, there is such an are 6),, +D” + 65;. giving a shorter distance from 1 to 2 than the geo- desic. Hence the geodesic cannot be the shortest distance. This contradicts our definition of a geodesic. Tb make sure that .D,, is not a geodesic we make use of a well known property of a second order differential if equation. Euler's equation for this geodesic is (23) {Wet "' fr‘y V’ * fww V” ’fy =0. Equation (23) can be solved for V" since {radio . If an equation of the type of (23) can be solved for v”’, then there is one and only one solution through an arbitrarily selected initial point and direction (143 J 1/, J (4’) . Hence if D” were a geodesic it would be necessary for it to coin- cide with 6&3 . Thus, all the geodesics through the point 1 would, by the same property, be tangent to and coincide with 5i, . Then there would be no one-parameter family of geo- desics as the theorem supposes. If the Jacobi condition is to be of much value we will need a convenient method for determining whether the geodesic has a contact point 3, called a conjugate point of l, * G.A. Bliss, grinceton @lloguium 1,ectures. 11 with the envelope of the family of geodesics through the point 1. From the calculus we know that if we have a one- parameter family of curves V=\/(«,d) the contact point of any one of these curves with the envelope of the family is a root of V,‘(u,.q when x, is the value of d defining that particular member of the family.* It is not always easy to determine a l-parameter family of extremals through the point 1 even if we do have the 2-parameter family of solutions of Euler's equation. For that reason we need a method of finding the points conju— gate to 1 from the original 2-parameter family of solutions V = V( a, 0-, b). If we were to write the 2-parameter family of ex- tremals as a l-parameter family it would be necessary to choose the two functions at“) andbc-r) such that (24) Vlunx) a w u, aw), 5(a)) satisfies the equation (25) V. = Wand»). If we differentiate (24) and (20) with respect to.“ we have V.. = V. (a, a, b)a.’ + v, (a... a... b) ti 0 : qu(“c a do b)al + Vb(“4 “J b) b’, * Wilson, Advanced Calculus, p. 136. 12 where 4' and 6’ are derivatives of d and b with respect to «X . When v. vanishes the determinant of the coefficients of d'and 6’ must also vanish. We can now state that the points (3) conjugate to a point 1 on the geodesic are determined by the zeros for a: a, of the determinant 4 Va‘“.4o,5-) Vb(“a¢0ob0) (26) A(“1u1)= V4 (69,40, 60) V5 (“hang be) when V( u.’ a, 6) is a 2-parameter family of extremals contain- ing the particular extremal for parameter values 4., b. . We shall find later that Jacobi's condition does not hold for all extremals. 7. §ufficiency conditions. In this section we shall give conditions that insure that our minimizing arc is a geo- desic. Tb accomplish this let us first define a field. A field is a region é? of (Lgyo-space which has associated with it a l-parameter family of extremal arcs all of which inter- sect a fixed curve.z> and which have the further property that through each point (a, v) of 6‘ there passes one and but one extremal of the family.* By applying the fundamental sufficiency theorem of the calculus of variations we have the following theorem:'* ¥Bliss I, p. 132. *nBliss I, p. 133. 13 Theorem. I; 6,, is an extremal of a fi_el_._d 5‘ t_h_§2_ 5,; _i_.§_ shorter than any 939; admissible gag C1,, in J3 joining 1h}: points I 229.. _2_. 1119.; 1—3, 6;, 15 a geodesic. This follows since [(1.9% V,’ V') 7a everywhere on our surface. theorem. Li; a curve 6,, ig a solution g_f_ Euler's a}; a, then 6!: i_s_ a geodesic. This theorem is a consequence of the ordinary suf- ficiency theorem for a strong relative minimum in the calcu- lus of variations since [(1.9% VIV') >0 and fwydu, V, V920 everywhere on the surface. 8. geodesics 9;; a sphere. If we choose the (UN) co- ordinate system as indicated in figure 2, th equations of 32 the sphere are X: 44...} u can”, (27) gi-‘dwwm' V) 18¢ Gnu. The linear element is 2_ a ‘ ‘-1 .1 (28) 4,, -aduramuaarx The problem is to find among all admissible arcs V:V(a.) , Lanna-l4, one which minimizes the integral 14 “1 fa. V/rmzu. V“ 44-. a l Euler's equation is M, = C, (29) y/ +M’KLV'2 Solving (29) for V’ we get v’- C (so) - WW.) which gives, by a quadrature (31) V‘mmL f5, tau-“- V—C' when K = -IC—’.' 1 With the values of sin V and cos V computed from (81), and with the aid of (27), we can write the equations of the geodesic as x: aKConuCocC -—aco.u,e.:...c [luau ~17, 21:: QKMILMC-i-dwudo-QC sz‘c-Kzu (58) 2: am». If in (32) we multiply x by cos c , y by sin C , z by-K and add we have (33) X can 6- +JAALIC +(-K)z=a. Equation (33) is of the form Ax +3y+€z:0, 15 which is the equation of a plane through the center of the sphere. The intersection of such a plane with a sphere is a great circle. Hence, the geodesics on a sphere are great circles. Suppose we have two points 1 and 2 on a sphere. The great circles through 1 have the point at the other extremity of the diameter through 1 as an envelope. Therefore to ob- tain the shortest distance we must use a portion of the are less than a semi-circle. For a sphere the determinant (26) is 1 I (I ~42) V/ —c,’,e..:x=u. (34) I (z-c,2)V/-c,5m;i2a" I I The zeros of (34) are u:- “Ign/pa‘. This checks with the above statement. 9. Ln_illustrative example. Given the surface of revolution x=L¢MV } y: “JAG—V) (35) z=é[um_,¢3(u.+m)., to find the geodesics. The linear element is (36) da’ = u’da.‘ “1‘00" . 16 The problem is to minimize the integral ‘5 (:57) / “Vl+v"du. l Euler's equation is I (38) W—% :C . Solving (38) for V, and then integrating, we have (39) v = ,2? c, (u . Vai-c‘) . The determinant (26) is I (4 163-63 +0.41%“) ' c (40) ' 23' I u,Vu;‘-c‘+(u,‘+c‘) , I. The zeros of (40) are use“, . Therefore, there are no conjugate points. Some of the geodesics are shown in figure 4, page 17. lo. A§_illustrative exam 1 ; th§_pseudo-sphere. The equations of our surface are X= umv. (41) yeumv, ’lr—zfj - ’.fifi7521 Z " I a ’2? a fi 18 The linear element is 2 (42) 442:3!1du +u‘do-2. The problem is to find the minimizing arcs for the integral a. (4'2) /)£". * “W7 dd" 9‘: The Euler equation is tc‘v’ duh-:0 (44) ’. + u V” pa Solving (44) for V"and integrating we have V __ l/c.¢'--¢:IL (45) "' Ca +6}. The determinant (26) becomes _z__ / 6" Va 3-63 ’ ‘ (46) I! 62 “$3.61 1 I The zero of which is u:=cg . Therefore there are no conjugate points. That is, a solution of Euler's equation is always a geodesic. Figure 5, page 19 shows the surface with some of the geodesics drawn. 19 II cronrsros; A PROBLEM or LAGRANGE t l. Ihe Lagrange problem. The Lagrange problem in the calculus of variations is that of finding among the arcs 5.11.11) (x, :x:x,,' i=1-" n), satisfying a set of differential equations (47) %(XJ jl“"jn, WWW” («=/--'rn4n), and joining two fixed points in (X, y, —---j..) space, one which minimizes an integral of the form ‘3 (48) x 'f (x, y, ""jn, y,’----y.,') d4. 2. Ihe problem 9: finding geodesics. Let (49) S.’ ¢(A;J,z)=a , be a surface on which we wish to find the geodesics. We assume that f has continuous derivatives up to and in- cluding those of the fifth order and that g! + £2 +£z #0’ at G.A. Bliss, J‘hq Eroblem 9; Lagrange .11}. 15h; Qalculus pi Iariations. American Journal of mathematics, Vol. LII No. 4, October 1930 p. 674 (Hereafter referred to as Bliss II) 20 21 everywhere on the surface. The form of the Lagrange problem that we are inter- ested in is to find among the arcs x: X($), (50) y = 3(5), 5, 9. 5:5, 2: 2(5). satisfying the equations (51) ?(X’5’I2)‘0 J X’z+ y’2+2”-/= 04 and having end points satisfying the equations (52) SI = Xl-“I =J1-p’ 31”” =X1‘“1 ‘Jz‘fiz‘zz'Yz =01 one which minimizes the integral is (53) j = .4: @- This is a problem with variable end points in (s, xd‘qfigyspace? the parameter 5 measures distance along the are starting at the point 1. In order to reduce this to the regular Lagrange problem we replace the first of the equations (51) by the equivalent equations (54) fl,x’+ fiy’+¢zz'=o, 22 *- (55) X, ”d! =3: '5: = 21" )7 = 4'2“: =j1-fla =0. We assume here that 7} as a at the end point 2. This does not restrict the generality as one of they;" J ¢73 J g is different from zero at every point. We can now replace equations (53) with the equations (56) 5’ :Xl-“I=Jl‘pl =1.'n=xa‘°‘z=y‘-pz=o. 3. The equations p:_f_ the geodesics. As a first necessary condition that an are be a geodesic, we have the followimg theorem: Ihgorem. [or every geodesic 6;, there exists 9, sgt pi constants c, , 62.9 and 9, function (57) F: / +A,($)(%X'+%gl+?22’) +_3:_2(5) (X’zfj’:f2'.-/)J such that S 6’21;de4 *9, £57“ *‘2. 5.2 [1' 5.4. F}.a +63, I H (58) F3! *Bliss II, p. 703 23 m gahhsfigd y; gm m pi Qt. 1h; gunctions (An A,) gr; M ppph identically _z_e_;‘_g_, 2.2.8. unigue 211g continuous except possibly g1; values p_f; s defining corners 9; 6’2. This theorem is the first necessary condition of the calculus of variations problem. In order to write the function F in the form (57) it is necessary that the mini- mizing arc be normal. In section 4 we shall show that every minimizing arc is normal. For the function F of (57) the equations (58) become I s I A: $3: “*Azx 57/5: Az(flxx *¢xgg'*¢:xz’)d& 3+CIJ I ‘ ' l I (59) A, $5 “(,3 =1; A,(¢.gx +4333 +7312).a +c21 5 1,56. + A, 22-1 A, (new my .59.. 194 +6.. By an integration by parts we can write (59) as s 11x, =jéfljl’fi’h fc’) I 5 l -— (so) 1.31 1'ij 4+ch , 5 l )1‘?’ :j "/(Ifld‘cfcg' 5/ From equations (60) we can state the theorem: Iheorem. h.geodesic can not have corners. From (60) we have that 111'; Agy', A, I'must be continuous on S, S, . Later we show that A; s/ and there- 24 fore X', ff ', zlmust be continuous. If we now take the derivative of both sides of (60) with respect to 5 we get the Euler-Lagrange multiplier rule. At every point of 532 the equations 670ml, 2) =0 . x” a“ fir , (6°) , .7” v“ 9’2, 2” =7“ g, must be satisfied. This proves the theorem: Theorem. Ah every point 93: .9. geodesic the principle normal 9; the geodesic must coincide with the surface normal. The derivatives x”! 3’2 3” and the factor/acnare continuous on S,’ 5, since the determinant A2 0 0 fl 2x' 0 1 0 ¢ 23‘ (61) ’ ’ a a A: «p, 22' fir ‘25 V9 0 0 2X’ 23’ 22’ 0 0 3 ¢(¢x: 4’ fl: *fl") 7‘0. at 131133 II, p. 684. 25 1 r 4. The transversality condition. The transversality condition for our problem is that the determinant -m *1. , -1, r. -Anx',".‘.7: 4.32 4.54213 run-1,; '1' ’3 “W34. 79 “’3' l 0' 0| 0 £7 (a ‘0 C? / 0 (0 C7 0 ‘0 0 ‘7 / 01 C7 «0 (7 O ‘7 a I (7 ‘7 ‘0 o c: o 0 6’ / 0 0 c7 '0 ‘7‘ ‘7 ‘9 I equals zero. This determinant reduces to A2 =F(’:) =7]. 5. uprmh;ipy p;_th§ gxtrema 5” Every extremal arc of our problem is normal. The condition for normality is that there exists six sets of values of (t’ f}, 2(5), 21(5),), (5)) with f: ’ f1 arbitrary and p, , 7, , % satisfying the equations c! i 25? (5’17. *2; 2. *9‘373)‘0: xlz’f glyzl" 217’! = a 1 and making the determinant (63) yBliSB II, p0 6930 1* Bliss II, p. 693 and p. 704. 3‘7: be $3 ‘‘‘‘ In. 7” (51) 712 (5.) 7,, (5.) ————— y“ (5.) 71! (SJ 7;; (5.) 7,, (5,) ----- 7,.(5) 731(5) 731 (5.) 7,, (5,) -—— -- 7... cs.) x,’ f,, *2/54) x; [11* 7,.(54) X,’fl,+z,(s,) ...___._x,‘};.+7,‘(s‘) 3.‘ t. we» :1.’ n. was» 3; )5. +7....) ----- g; h. an...) different from zero. In (62) the arguments are the Ly, z, X’, y: 2' of the extremal arc. The equation (62) can written % 7,’ 437,: 1* fiz’ + (flxx’ *fi,y’+ 75,297, +(gxx’+¢,,y’+¢,,2')g, +(q>,,x’+ ¢,yg’+%32')73=0’ X’z ’ +57; 4- 2’3’ 5Q The matrix 9% , be is of rank 2 at every point of the extremal since the directions 49,. :¢, ; $1 and X ’;g’,z' are orthogonal. another function Yang/,2, x,’ y’, 2') such that Take 27 is of rank 3 at every point. Consider the set of equations ¢x7,’ *QP; (4&2, +(%.X'+¢qg’+¢xel')z +(%M’%.y'%.wz + .’ ' ‘0. " ' a; .' é . 3;;8‘3‘!—‘ 3“ LI was) ‘ gut. 1.?- ) a". .' VI" ‘4‘ L "..'W- ,{I'A‘E'y ‘1‘. ‘ I‘m?- ‘ r - 'w‘fl I“..,--S‘H’ ‘.'K, (§’v " '..‘ *4 . . ; :t‘ , ' V" , gum} ' ..~,‘$;4. y. -. , .‘Jwa:~:*3"f ' .-’ . av . . . 3:11.) . ' ' .‘ .é‘k‘?‘ Ix, m’fé‘.’;|~‘\£ TE§;H‘:'F‘;Q [Fifi i gt“, , ,' 9&9.” *fignahi-gir ‘- : - , - , “a; .1“ r - r .' Q I ‘ . ."’ ‘( - A ‘ v.- V 4-". “3.??- Mir . f . fk» ' “N" ,' i ‘ 95?“,3' "3' ”a ” . . r I .. . (Ly. ‘...»\ . L >1 . '.¢ ".', '..:1'~.. " . ..‘~