H W 1 — — ___—_ _ — f _ __’_— — ’P‘ — , _. ,_‘ _ ,— 5 — ’— ,_ -"—'__—__"_ — _’_.. __'__’ __’_d — __— ’— :——;_ — —’_‘_ _’_— — __p. __—_'__ — ’—4 THE EFF-Em 83E: ADEHQS‘N‘ TRSF‘HG“ HHS: T" ”P11 1'33 fii‘ie‘y‘xULifi‘icm £3? QiEAVAQE 2% THE “W‘s. CF RAN-it Mimi H5 mm... W T113319 50? Has? magma; a? mi. S. WCHEGAH STATES Ué‘e “JERS'T‘K 9:02.512 d a. flew 5" 1296-22 TH E515 LIBRARY Michigan Sm: University ABSTRACT THE EFFECT OF ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPFATE ON THE STIKULATION OF CLEAVAGE IN THE EGGS OF RANA PIPIENS by Ronald J. Pfohl A series of experiments were conducted to determine what effect the injection of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) into parthenogenetically stimulated eggs of Rana pipiens would have on the number which successfully cleaved to the blastula stage. In general, the experimental procedure involved the injection into eggs of approximately 0.2-0.3 lambda quantities of 1.61 X 10-3 M.ATP solutions in Niu-Twitty or Steinberg buffer. In some cases the design of the experiments was such that the injection process effected the activation of eggs smeared with blood. In other cases the injection was performed two hours after the eggs had been activated either by fertilization or by smearing the eggs with blood and pricking them with a fine glass needle. The percentages of eggs which cleaved when injected with ATP were compared with the percentages which cleaved when injected with only the buffer solution. The results obtained, though not conclusive, indicate that the ATP injected into the eggs caused an increase in the numbers which cleaved as compared with those simply injected with the buffer medium. Ronald J. Pfohl The predominant effect of the ATP seems to stem from an ability to aid the egg in overcoming the injury it has sustained in the injection procedure. Utilization of the high energy moiety of the ATP molecule and its possible sites of action are discussed with reference to the mode of action of ATP in the enhancement of cleavage. THE EFFECT OF ADEIOSIKE TRIPHOSPHATE ON THE S T IL‘U LAT I ON OF C LENA GE IN THE EGGS OF RANA PIPIENS By Ronald J. Pfohl A TEESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of EASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Zoology 1962 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to express his sincere gratitude to Dr. John R. Shaver for initiating this investigation and for his continued confidence, interest, and encouragement during the course of this study. Thanks are also due Dr. Philip Clark and Dr. Lester Wolterink for their constructive criticism in preparing the final manuscript. Finally, the author wishes to express his appreciation to "mac" Henderson for her understanding and frequent assistance on numerous occasions. ii TABLE OF COLTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv LIST OF APPEKDICES . . . . . . . . . . . . v INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l A. Parthenogenesis, With Special Reference to the Eggs of Frogs l B. A Review of Some Aspects of Cell Division 5 l. Sol-gel Transformations; Cell Cortex in Cleavage 5 2. The Spindle in mitosis 8 3. Energetics of Cell Division ll LmTERIALs AND METHODS . . . . . . . . . . . 21 RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 DISCUSSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 SUMKARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 APPEHDICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 LITERATURE CITED . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 iii Table 1A 1B 2A 2B 5A 5B 4A 4B LIST OF TABLES Pooled data from frogs III-IX; Activation simultaneous with injection of Niu-Twitty buffer (pH 7.0-7.5) or 0.1% ATP solution (pH 600-605) 0 o o o o o o o o o o Paired observations; Eggs smeared with blood and injected with Niu-Twitty buffer or with ATP; Values given are percentages of eggs which developed to the blastula Stage 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O Pooled data from frogs X and XI; Niu-Twitty buffer (pH 6.6) or 0.1% ATP solution (pH 6.6) injected about 2 hairs after activation . . Paired observations; Pricked blood-smeared eggs and fertilized eggs injected with Niu-Twitty buffer or with ATP two hours after being activated; Values given are percentages of eggs which developed to the blastula stage . . . . . . . . . . Pooled data from frogs XIII and XIV; Acti- vation simultaneous with injection of Steinberg's medium (pH 6.85) and 0.1% ATP solution (pH 6.65) . . . . . . . . . Paired observations; Eggs smeared with blood and injected with Steinberg's medium or with ATP; Values given are percentages of eggs which developed to the blastula stage . Pooled data from frogs XII and XIII; Stein- berg's medium (pH 6.85) or 0.1% ATP solution (pH 6.65) injected about 2 hours after acti- vation . . . . . . . . . . . . . Paired observations; Pricked blood-smeared eggs and fertilized eggs injected with Steinberg's medium or with ATP two hours after being activated; Values given are percentages of eggs which developed to the blastula stage . . . . . . . . . . iv Page 28 28 50 50 33 53 55 55 Appendix I II III IV LIST OF APPENDICES Page Data from frogs I-IX; Activation simul- taneous with the injection of Niu-fwitty buffer (pH 7.0-7.5) or 0.01, 0.1, or 0.5% ATP solution (pH 6.0-6.5); Values in the table indicate the numbers of eggs which were treated and which cleaved to the blastula stage in each category . . . . . 47 Data from frogs X and XI; Kiu-Twitty buffer (pH 6.6) or 0.1% ATP solution (pH 6.6) injected about 2 hours after activation; Values in the table indicate the numbers of eggs which were treated and which cleaved t0 the blastula stage in each category . . . 48 Data from frogs XIII and XIV; Activation simultaneous with the injection of Stein- berg's medium (pH 6.85) or 0.1% ATP solution (pH 6.65); Values in the table indicate the numbers of eggs which were treated and which cleaved to the blastula stage in each category . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 Data from frogs XII and XIII; Steinberg's medium (pH 6.85) or 0.1% ATP solution (pH 6.65) injected about 2 hours after activation; Values in the table indicate the numbers of eggs which were treated and which cleaved to the blastula stage in each category . . . 50 INTRODUCTION The aim of this investigation was to determine what affect the injection of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) into parthenogenetically stimulated frog eggs had on the number which successfully cleaved to the blastula stage. To familiarize the reader with the experimental material, a brief discussion of parthenogenesis in the eggs of frogs will be given. Following this, evidence concerning certain sol-gel transformations in relation to the cell cortex and to the spindle in cleavage and mitosis and their associations with ATP will be discussed. The evidence supporting a role for ATP in the process of cell division points, with some reservations, to the high energy moiety of ATP as the probable factor of functional significance. This review of the literature serves as the basis for the study undertaken and _reported on in this paper. A. Parthenogenesis, With Special Reference 32 the Eggs ‘2: Frogs Fertilization, as defined by Lord Rothschild (1956, p. l), is "the incitement of an egg to development by a spermatozgon, together with the transmission of male heredi- tary material to the egg." That the male nucleus is not always necessary for normal development is shown by the occur- rence of natural or spontaneous parthenogenesis (i.e. devel- Opment of the egg without fertilization) in such animals as the aphids, butterflies, bees, silkworms, and certain of the -1- -2- crustacea (Loeb, 1915, chapter V). Observations on the occurrence of natural partheno- genesis were the starting point for investigations upon artificial parthenogenesis. It soon became apparent that a great number and diversity of treatments, including puncture, heat, cold, ultra-violet radiation, acids, bases, isotonic salt solutions, hyper- and hypotonic solutions, fat solvents, and some alkaloids, were capable of inciting the eggs of some species of animals to develop. This array of agents contrasts strikingly with the high degree of specificity in fertilization and does not lend support to the idea that the parthenogenetic agent represents the effective component(s) of the spermatozBon. A number of theories, reviewed by Tyler (1941), have been advanced to account for the same response of the egg to a variety of agents. The frog egg appears to be exceptional in that it has been possible to incite it to develop completely only by the use of one type of procedure, to be described below. One may regard the initiation of parthenogenetic development in the frog egg as involving two phases. The first is an "activation" phase consisting of the separation of the vitelline membrane with subsequent formation of the perivitelline space, rotation of orientation, formation of the grey crescent region, and completion of the second maturation division. Many of the parthenogenetic agents which successfully incite other eggs to deve10p are capable only of stimulating the frog egg to undergo this first phase. .—:5- The events observed in this first phase may occasionally be followed by so-called "abortive" cleavages which in effect may involve one or two irregular cleavajes or superficial indications of attempts at cleavage. Such events are not generally considered to involve bona fide initiation of cleavage, although migration of chromosomes and certain sol-gel transformations may result. Successfully inciting a frog egg to undergo further parthenogenetic development therefore involves a second phase. Bataillon (1911) used the terms "first factor" and "second factor" to designate the components necessary to initiate the two phases. The necessity of a "second factor" for the initiation of zenuine cleavage in the frog egg was established by Bataillon in 1912 (cited by Bataillon, 1929). He showed that complete cleava e in the frog egg could be accomplished by introducing a cellular element into the cytoplasm at the time of activation. This may be achieved simply by pricking the egg ("first factor") with a fine glass needle in the presence of blood, lymph, or the brei of some tissues ("second factor"). Bataillon believed that the "second factor" induces the formation of a normal mitotic figure and must include material from a nucleated cell. Einsele (1950), however, demonstrated the cleavage-initiating capacity of supernatant fluids which were obtained after centrifugation of homogenized frog tissues and injected into virgin frog eggs. Shaver (1953) substantiated the work of Einsele and carried the -4- analysis beyond that of previous workers by determining which fractions of the cell were the most active. He accom- plished this by homogenizing and differentially centrifuging adult and embryonic frog tissues and injecting the fractions thus obtained into the eggs. The large granule fraction, possibly mitochondrial in nature, proved to be the most effective in initiation of cleavage. When frog eggs were injected with the large granule fraction obtained from frog blood cell homogenates, 20.8% of the eggs cleaved to the blastula stage. A maximum of 44.6% cleavage to blastulae was obtained when the eggs were injected with the large granule fraction obtained from the homogenate of early frog gastrulae. In contrast to the findings of Bataillon (1919), Shaver (1953) reported that injection of whole frog serum into the eggs of frogs resulted in 11.7% cleaving to the blastula stage. Since the "second factor" appears to be principally concerned with the stimulation of bona fide cleavage, Shaver (1955) preferred to call the active agent (or agents) the "cleavage initiating substance" (013). The chemical nature of the 013 in the cytoplasmic granules is not yet known. In this investigation, the eggs of frogs were incited to develop by the usual technique, namely smearing the egg lightly with frog blood and pricking them with a fine glass :needle or micropipette. The percentage of eggs smeared with 'blood that one can normally expect to cleave to blastomeres (of approximately the size attained by embryos in Shumway -5- stages 8 or 9) following artificial activation is generally within the range of S-ZOK. Why only 15% of the eggs parthe- nogenetically stimulated actually cleave is not well under- "proper" astral system is stood. Apparently, formation of a necessary for segmentation of the egg to occur normally (Herlant, 1913). Parthenogenesis in the egg of the frog does not occur spontaneously in nature. It is likely that, with the present procedures, the proper combination of a number of factors, such as the condition of the egg and the precise stimulation applied to it, occurs only in a small percentage of attempts. Also, injury may be sustained by certain eggs when punctured. It is remarkable, therefore, that even 5-20% of the eggs should cleave. Obviously, then, an increase in the proportion which undergo successful cleavage may be the consequence of any of a number of possible mecha- nisms. On the basis of the evidence presented in the following review, consideration was given to the possibility that ATP added to the system might aid the egg in overcoming factors which often hinder its cleavage. B. A Review 2: Some Aspects 2: Cell Division 1. Sol-gel Transformations; Cell Cortex in Cleavage The gelation of many protoplasmic systems is an endo- thermic process involving volume increase. Gel systems of such a nature may be referred to as type II according to the Freundlich classification (Marsland and Brown, 1942; karsland, 1948). The interconversion of protOplasm from the sol to Cf he gel state or vice verse is thought to play an important part in cell division. Although the structure of protoplasmic gels and the nature of the alterations thereof in sol-gel transformations have not been clearly determined, X-ray diffraction and electron microscopy studies and theoretical considerations based on the physical properties of certain gel systems sugrest that the gelation process probably repre- sents the formation of a 3-dimensional network from fibrillar units present in the system (Ferry, 1948; Kepac, 1950). Gelation has been shown to be correlated with furrow formation in the eggs of certain marine animals and in the eggs of Rana pipiens (Marsland and Landau, 1954). With an increase in temperature, a greater pressure is required to block the first cleavage furrow (i.e. a temperature increase favors gelation while a pressure increase favors solation). Thus, when the "structural strength" (based on the relative resistance to displacement of visible granules through the gel in eggs of marine species) of the cortical gel systems investigated by Marsland and coworkers falls to a certain critical level, the furrowing ceases. A number of theories have been advanced to explain cleavage. They are critically analyzed by Wolpert (1960). In the egg of a frog the new cell surface is formed dg'ngvo, and the only theory directly applicable to this material is that of Selman and Waddington (1955). -7- Using cine-film techniques, local vital staining and serial sections, Selman and Waddihgton (1955) conclude that the new unpigmented cortex, by which the daughter blastomeres remain in contact after cleavage, is first formed as a sheet of gel (in later stages they describe it as being a double layer) which grows downward through the cytoplasm from the animal toward the vegetal surface by a process involving gelation at its lower edge. They suggest that 1) cortical gel is being synthesized before cleavage as an additional layer beneath the pigmented cortex already exist- ing, 2) a change from gel to sol occurs at the inner surface of the pigmented cortex with subsequent transfer of the material to the required region during cleavage, and 5) a change from sol to gel takes place along the lower edge of the new unpigmented cortex being formed ahead of the furrow. They also conclude that the gel layer contracts immediately after its formation, and in this way produces the "dipping in" of the new furrow and all the observed surface movements. It must be realized that the above description is purely morphological. If the sol-gel transformations described do indeed occur, and if the gelation is an endo- thermic process involving volume increase, no explanation is available, to the knowledge of the present author, with regard to the nature of the energy transformations or exchanges occurring in the synthesis of the gel and subse- quent transition to the sol state, followed by gelation in the furrow region. Does the temperature increase or pressure -8- applied to the eggs of 3. pipiens in the experiments of Marsland and Landau (1954) affect the initial synthesis of the gel or the later sol to gel transformation in the forma- tion of the new cell surface? Furthermore, no adequate description is given of the force vectors likely to be involved in the contraction postulated by Selman and Waddirgton (1955). Another process, possibly involving ATP, must be invoked on the basis that if the gelation process itself involves a volume increase as postulated, one would expect the gelation process to result in elongation rather than contraction of gel structures. 2. The Spindle in Mitosis The preceding discussion has been concerned principally with gel-sol transformations in the cell cortex. This pheno- menon is thought to be of importance also in the establish- ment of the mitotic apparatus. The initial development by Hazia and Dan (1952) of a method for isolating the mitotic apparatus of sea urchins has Opened new fields of investiga- tion concerning this structure. decently, Nazia and coworkers (1961) have utilized dithiodiglycol (DTDG) to obtain what are possibly "native" mitotic apparatuses. The mitotic apparatus has been defined (mazia and Dan, 1952) as the "ensemble of structures constituting the 'chromatic' and 'achromatic' figures in the classical descriptions of mitosis. It includes spindles, asters, centrioles, nuclei (before breakdown) and chromosomal structures (after break- 'be almost entirely nucleated. Since the cleavage of the eggs was the only phenomenon Inader investigation, the development of the embryos beyond the blastula stage was not recorded. RESULTS The following three concentrations of ATP in Niu- Twitty solution were initially tested: 0.01% (1.61 x 10’4 M); 0.1% (1.61 x 10‘3r); and 0.5% (8.05 x 10‘3m). Different batches of eggs from each of the frogs III-V were injected with the three concentrations of ATP. Combining the results from the eggs of the three fr0gs, the injection of 0.01% ATP solution into blood-smeared eggs resulted in 6.8% cleavage; 0.1% ATP, 9.6% cleavage; and 0.5% ATP, 7.6% cleavage. The percentage of cleavages resulting from the control eggs which were smeared with blood and injected with Niu-Twitty buffer was 2.1%. The means of the differences between the percen- tages 0f blood-smeared control eggs which cleaved when injected simply with buffer and the percentages of blood- smeared egcs which cleaved when injected with ATP at concen— trations of 0.1% and 0.5% were significantly different from 0 at the 5% level. The 0.1% solution of ATP was selected for the remaining injections. In the first set of experiments the activation of the eggs was effected at the time of the injection. The results of injecting a 0.1% solution of ATP into the eggs of frogs III-IX are shown in Appendix I, and the percentages of cleavages calculated from the pooled data are shown in Table 1A. For cleavage to be initiated it was necessary to supply another factor, in this case whole blood, prior to the injec- tion. ATP by itself was incapable of initiating cleavage. The 0.6% cleavage obtained in unsmeared eggs injected with -25- -27- buffer, the 0.6% cleavage in unsmeared eggs injected with ATP and the 0.2% cleavage in unsmeared eggs simply pricked were probably due to contamination of the eggs with tissue debris. . The design of this experiment was such as to show any difference in the number of cleavages resulting from the two different treatments, namely, the injection of 1) Niu-Twitty buffer and 2) ATP into eggs smeared with blood. Since the eggs of different frogs may show some variation, genetic or otherwise, and since the eggs from each frog were subjected to both treatments, it was possible to apply a statistical test to the mean of the differences between the percentages of cleavages induced by the injection of buffer and the percentages induced by the injecticn of ATP into the blood- smeared eggs of each frog. This approach provides a more sensitive test than one based on group comparisons in which case the test is applied to the difference of the means of the two groups (Snedecor, 1955; Fisher, 1950). The percentage of cleavages for each group of eggs from each frog and the differences between the two groups were calculated from the data in Appendix I and are shown in Table 1B. The mean difference, 3, is 6.88 and the standard error of the mean difference, is 2.25. Using these figures we 83’ may calculate "Student's" t value and find t = 5.085. With 6 degrees of freedom, the table value at the 5% level is 2.447. Thus at the 5% level, on the basis of the figures Table 1A: Pooled data from frogs III-IX; Activation simul— taneous with injection of Niu-Twitty buffer (pH 7.0— 7.5) or 0.1% ATP solution (pH 5.0-5.5). -28- Treatment :3 :i s a a s e P. a: L? L» a» ;: g m ‘° 3 2 Number of eggs Blastulae g..- a) s: 0’ d' c-r .. E,“ Q“ a '5' 3° 3° treated Number 23 m B o :3 :3 o. 0 a m n o o H m to *t ‘D 2”; z > a m we re e m (D D; x i J . . 1.554. . ”1.4117 - 85:1“? #3.... .1 X-.. x-.- _ - -H--...--.v--._-..--..._..--_ SQ.8_._._,-.___.,-,--__-. l . 1 0.2 x xj» 545 _ 76 15 9 X in; il-,_l_-lmM117§4 4 OLE ”ix“ 3” 986- 50 5.1 xi,“ x_.L..._ 71.5 . 4._ 0.6 .3- -léli l. -_lllgll 119 11-8 Table 1B: Paired observations; Eggs smeared with blood and injected with Niu—Twitty buffer or with ATP; Values given are percentages of eggs which developed to the blastula stage. , v-1-..q__ll.i.i .__ Frog Treatment Difference Eggs smeared with blood [will__ll.mll_.llllln-n_nl.llll_lfl__ll___ Inj. with NT [Inj. with ATP :111 4.55 l 1.3.55..- l... “zeal.--“ . V 0.67 10L62 9.95 VI 15.55 ; 15:11 1.56 VII 4155 1 12.90 8.55 VIII _12.94 : 11g20 -l.74 IX 2-19.... _ l 13.65 l_6-_.._.44__ -29- given, we may assert that the difference between the percen- tage of cleavages resulting from injection of buffer and the percentage resulting from the injection of ATP into eggs smeared with blood is significantly different from zero. One cannot, however, conclude from this significant difference that the injection of ATP does enhance the initiation of cleavage, because the pH of the Niu-Twitty buffer used in the control injections was not the same as the pH of the injected ATP solutions. In preparing the 0.1% solution, the addition of ATP to the Niu—Twitty buffer lowered the pH of the latter as much as 1.5 pH units. Whereas the pH of the injected buffer was generally 7.0-7.5, the pH of the ATP solution was 6.0-6.5. Maintainino the two solutions at the same pH would have eliminated or established the possibility that the acidity of the ATP solution was a factor contributing to the results obtained. In the second series of experiments, the Niu-Twitty buffer and the 0.1% ATP solution were both maintained at pH 6.6. In this series of experiments, observations were made on the effect of injecting ATP into the eggs two hours after they had been activated; in other words, after the emission of the second polar body and before the first cleavage division. During the first hour after activation the egg is apparently in such a sensitive state that any disturbance, such as puncturing, will stop cleavage. Acti- vation was accomplished by one of three methods: pricking Table 2A: Pooled data from frogs X-XI; Niu-Twitty buffer (pH 6.6) or 0.1% ATP solution (pH 6.6) injected about 2 hours after activation. __.._._- -. - -. T ___ . ._-__.-..- Treatment I l 7 I ““7” ' ”fl—H W— ‘EA 7“ - "“77 ‘ "1:1 7 '11 II} I31 I HI H 0 !H 02 on 5 d a srh to :Q 4 x>: >4 L L I I (\3 O) 0 HT (1). ; CflOCfiCDI—‘l—‘CDO I I. I NI I I _IL;LLQ:}239[;I;.W"I‘ ”41:7 ; i; u.—-v——.44 *4.— »y—-—-.—_——- n-o-w —— ~. Table 2B: Paired observations; Pricked blood-smeared eggs and fertilized eggs injected with Niu-Twitty buffer Or with ATP two hours after being activated; Values given are percentages of eggs which developed to the blastula stage. ._ ,_____._-._ '1] H u 0 I 09 ' Treatment Difference} ..,. --_-___...____ -. - ___..- __ __ n..- -A... --- - i Eggs smeared with blood and pricked I p.._.-..._.‘-.... -__._.-_______.___._..__ . . ___..-___ ___ .. ___..- _- ___-_-- I inj. with NT Inj. with ATP . -X 7”}- ‘L"_-ifi.7éflfli 7“ :fiLSd;"'mm" q}-— 776 Is 3— x: - 6.47 .___,__.___.__._”_____,_1_61.88..~ 711.411 ' "‘1 Eggs fertilized _ . _4 I Inj. with NT IfiInj. with ATP ' ___—— n»- X "" m IIP01.80:;“_“IMH“M_91.5Bubm“I“. 7"30{4éi_'1 ii; -ii_i 57.95WIHH-IHMHH_67.oeWM_ -30- -51- unsmeared eggs; pricking eggs smeared with blood; and fertilization. The eggs of frogs X and XI were used in this series, and the percentages shown in Table 2A were calculated from a summation of the results shown in Appendix II. Upon examining the percentages of blastulae shown in Table 2A, it is apparent that the injections of buffer and ATP into unsmeared eggs two hours after being activated by pricking had no appreciable effect. The 1.1% cleavage obtained upon injection of buffer into unsmeared eggs was probably due to contamination of the eggs with tissue debris. The lower percentages of blastulae obtained where fertilized eggs were injected with buffer and with ATP as compared to the untreated fertilized control were very likely due to the injury sustained by the eggs resulting from the injection process. The percentages of cleavages of eggs from each frog after each treatment are shown in Table 2B. Testing the mean of the differences between the percen- tages of cleavages of fertilized eggs injected with buffer and of fertilized eggs injected with ATP shows that it is not significantly different from zero at the 5% level. Similarly, when testing the mean of the differences between the percentages of cleaving eggs obtained by injecting buffer and ATP into eggs smeared with blood and activated by pricking, it was shown to be not significantly different from zero at the 5% level. An insufficient number of animals in this experiment -52- does not allow one to make any conclusive statements concerning the effectiveness of ATP in enhancing the cleavage initiation process. In the eggs of frog XI there was an appreciable increase in the percentages of cleavages when ATP was injected, particularly in the group activated by pricking. It is quite possible that if the number of animals had been larger the effect of ATP would have been statistically significant since the standard error of the mean would very probably have been considerably reduced. In the next series of experiments, Steinberg's medium replaced the Niu-Twitty solution. The Niu-Twitty solution was not entirely satisfactory as a buffer because upon standing its pH had a tendency to rise due to the breakdown of the NaH005 component of the buffer into Na and 0H ions and C02 gas. Steinberg's medium is a solution having the same iso- tonic salt combination as the Niu-Twitty solution but con- taining a Tris-H01 buffer in substitution for the phosphate and bicarbonate buffering system of the Niu-Twitty solution. ‘Groups of eggs from frogs XIII and XIV were treated in a manner similar to those of frogs III-IX in the first series of experiments except that the buffer solution used was Steinberg's. The solutions of ATP prepared were of a 0.1% concentration. The pH of the Steinberg's medium to be injected as the control was 6.85 while that of the ATP solution (ATP dissolved in Steinberg's medium) was 6.65. The results obtained are shown in Tables 5A and 5B. The values given were compiled and calculated from the data in Table 5A: Pooled data from frogs XIII and XIV; Activation simultaneous with injection of Steinberg's medium (pH 6.85) and 0.1% Treatment m w Diwltd +4 H CD *3 to 109 :5 1'3 H F“ C? C? L5. L* d o m im‘ 0 o H- WI i to 0 H (I) I5:: 0":C'1' ct- H Q .5 F41t* H N am ! o ; O O 0 1 s :o :23 3 Q“ :0 ' OJ; am: ll 0 O :H 'm :Fs- m :(D ‘ a} I iDa'CD: (135:9 i 1 m: 3 !H3 : 012 gD-d l .0 ! 3 i . Q. ' 11_¢_.£ : : i _sxn 1 g l .1221}--.- .'. 1 a x ' “-x - 5‘ hi“ _ ix Q. :X i . . l -;-_fx ;X_;1- 1212--.- -._',- X- _WTI. g-X-1i_ __X- 5 i 4 I ‘ .——.—.—-———-.~L ———.v—n-- 1W WNF‘n-h- ._ “-_—4—_———_ u... . - —- 1 - I ‘ | ‘ ; ; . 1 - . l V ' ‘ ‘ . ‘ A ‘ . ' \ ——.—. —.v-_7» ATP solution treated 169 102 f'199“fw 454 ---_ 116 __, 1 11431___1 _108__"N Number of eggs (pH 6.65). Blastulae Number % " ' ' 555 1:: 77.2“ _-01111-_ Ow1_ 1 _531. 22.4” _ l _ 0.9“ 1 51 18.5“ _1 01-- 0- _ 1”,? -l§pl Table 5B: Paired observations; Eggs smeared with blood and injected with Steinberg's medium or with ATP; Values given are percentages of eggs which developed to the blastula stage. Frog Treatment FIEggs smeared with blood - Inj. with SM Inj. with ATP 4XIII:;;_‘”"{, # 17.92 . v.17.so_ “11 _KIXWMM-1111_LN 19-05-1m1__m11_6.17 ,1WV1 -55- __.. ‘1 '1 Difference [ “ E s _T i _ _ _____i _ - 0.12 11‘ J _-12_._es _fl; Appendix III. From Table SB we may calculate a mean difference of -6.50 and a standard error of the mean difference of 6.58. From these figures we obtain a "Student's" t value of -1.019, which with 1 degree of freedom is not significantly different from zero at the 5% level. Finally, a series of eggs, smeared or unsmeared with blood, were injected with Steinberg's medium or ATP solution (0.1%) about two hours after activation by pricking or ferti- lization. The pHs of the injection media were the same as in the preceding series of experiments. The results, compiled from the data in Appendix IV, are summarized in Tables 4A and 4B. When comparing the results shown in Table 43 obtained by injecting the control buffer and ATP into fertilized eggs, a mean difference of 5.56 and a standard error of the mean difference of 1.228 are calculated. These figures yield a "Student's" t value of 2.756. A mean difference of 0.595 and a standard error of the mean difference of 2.185 are calculated from the results obtained by injecting the control buffer and ATP into the eggs two hours after they had been smeared with blood and pricked. These figures yield a "Student's" t value of 0.272. With 1 degree of freedom neither of the mean differences obtained are significantly different from zero at the 5% level. The inadequate sample size again does not allow one to make definite assertions concerning the effectiveness of Table 4A: Pooled data from frogs XII ant XIII; Steinberg's medium (pH 6.85) or 0.1% ATP solution (pH 6.65) injected about 2 hours after activation. .-._._._.__-_ . ._ . _____-.-___.__. - ”"“"Y" Treatment 7—...._ r— —.o-1 . m m p9ZIIIQJ9d d) PGHOTJd Number of eggs g Blastulae %_H_ treated ‘ Number DGJBGQSUH 8 we JO UOIQOQFUI div JO UOIqerUI ) 1 I I i 1 E peaeems-pootq 8223 CR 1 ‘1-” _-’__ " -_ -_ .. ‘-_---i _.--_._w__.-- __.-_.._-._ ___--- - _-1--.____ _ * “I , L 171.- _ . 51-11.. l-Weeo 170-_ 1. 187... - ,-_H_- 1. -_M 1-L_111____112571 _-_H -‘1__16___ - xi 255 U“_ 1,-11501 - x _ 196 1” 0 X __‘r . l l ----.Wv _ .—. _- “h... -—__..__.‘_. — _-__ _. - (nu: QOQGOQOOU' I l ' ()1 1 ——1"_ __.___--~_-_4 . ._...._ .11248- _ "_m_j_ 19 [<1 040301030) [0 Table 4B: Paired observations; Pricked blood-smeared eggs and fertilized eggs injected with Steinberg's medium or with ATP two hairs after being activated; Values given are percentages of eggs which developed to the blastula stage. 9‘ . _ _.. . _ __ __ _, __._ Frog Treatment Difference ___“- __.---_-__.-.____._______-. ___. -. -_- ._ __-_.__ ___—__T Eggs smeared with blood and pricked 1111111111-_1111-11*11111-11_--m1111_11 Inj. with SM Inj. with ATP -_1-_-1-. 11__11-____. _ -11. mm 1 _1._1_1W _1_1,1-_1__-11_1- -_11,lllm111-f__ .2978_11 11-1- 1MT-hl__1-a.55_-- - LKIII -,q_-5£151 l .“___§h§41”_wim4m_m:lnsaflfi Eggs fertilized Inj. with SM Inj. with ATP -.-._ _....._—_._ _. ..-.. ___ __ 58.§1iifnw __WJH2.24"' -__8%-35 1 -1 ___ - . :x11_ ”“55.17 fxggigflwu 5 _mm_m79.av -55- ATP in enhancing cleavage. -56- DISCUSSION A number of experiments, the results of which have been presented in the preceding section, have been performed in an attempt to ascertain what effect, if any, the intro— duction of ATP into unfertilized frog eggs would have on the percentage which successfully cleaved to the blastula stage. These experiments were suggested by evidence that ATP is functional in cell division and structural alterations of the cell (see marsland, 1956; Runnstrom and Kriszat, 1950a,b; Hoffmann-Berling, 1960). The bulk of this evidence has been gathered from such materials as marine invertebrate eggs and fibroblast cell models. Some of the evidence mentioned was obtained from amphibian material, however, and was of such a nature as to suggest the presence of gel systems similar to those in marine invertebrate egrs and cell models. The lines of evidence indicating the presence of systems in the eggs of amphibians which may utilize ATP in the process of cell division are l) the demonstration by Marsland and Landau (1954) that the gelation process in the eggs of E. pipiens is an endothermic process, 2) the work of Selman and Waddington (1955) which indicates that gelation is an important process in the dg novo formation of the new cell surface in the cleavawe of amphibian eggs, 5) the inhibition of cleavage in amphibian morulae by DNP, which is known to inhibit oxidative phosphorylation (see Brachet, 1957, p. 177), and 4) the demonstration by piegelman and Moog (cited by -57- -58- Brachet, 1950, p. 169) that sodium azide, an inhibitor of transphosphorylation and ATPase activity, will stop segmen- tation of 3. pipiens eggs. As might be expected, the presence of enzymes catalyzing ATP hydrolysis in the eggs of frogs has been shown by Barth and Jaeger (1947). Evidence of a more indirect nature is gained from sodium azide (Shaver, it 31, 1952) and heparin (Shaver, 1949; Harding, D., l949, 1951) inhibition studies in relation to the cleavage initiating substance in artificial parthenogenesis in amphi- bians. Finally, the large granule fraction, presumably mito- chondrial in nature, obtained upon centrifuging homogenates of frog gastrulae, was found to have a high cleavage-initia- ting capacity in experimental parthenogenesis (Shaver, 1955). Althuigh the results of the present investigation indicate that ATP pea 33 has no cleavage initiating capacity (0.6, 0.0, 0.0, 0.02 cleavage when unsmeared eggs are injected with ATP; see Tables 1A, 2A, 5A, and 4A, respectively), it is possible that the ATP produced by mitochondria may have some function in increasing the number of successful cleavages. Some experiments in this study were performed in such a way that the injection procedure also effected the activa- tion process (Tables lA,lB and 5A,5B), while in others the injection procedure followed activation by pricking or by fertilization by about two hours (Tables 2A,2B and 4A,4B). In 1958, Wolpert reported that treatment of sea urchin eggs with ATP ten minutes prior to cleavage resulted in the eggs showing considerable delay and abnormalities in cleavage, or -39- resulted in the eggs failing to cleave at all. Such results might be expected under the supposition that the eggs were unable to regulate the ATP supply within such a short time prior to cleavage and as a result a relaxation or elongation would be induced by the supraoptimal concentrations of ATP in a manner analogous to that described by Hoffmann-Berling (1960) in cell model systems. When Niu-Twitty buffer solution was used in the present study as a medium for the solution of ATP, however, no apparent difference in the response of the eggs to the injection of ATP at the time of activation and two hours after activation was noted (Tables lA,lB and 2A,2B). Wolpert (1962) has since attributed his results to artifact due to pH changes. It is apparent from the results presented that the injection of buffer into eggs smeared with blood had some detrimental effect on the eggs. The percentages of eggs cleaving to blastulae in this case (5.1, 6.9, 18.5, and 6.8 in series lA—4A) were always less than the percentages obtained by simply puncturing smeared eggs (15.9, 8.1, 22.4, and 29.8, respectively). With the exception of series 2, the percentages of cleavages obtained upon injecting ATP into the eggs (11.8, 15.7, 15.1, 7.7) were also less than those obtained by the simple puncturing procedure, but, with the exception of series 5, the percentages were more than those obtained in the controls where buffer was injected into smeared eggs. The results of injecting ATP into the smeared eggs thus seemed to indicate that the ATP counter- -43- acted to some extent the detrimental effect of the injection process. As was pointed out in the presentation of results, the sample sizes in the second, third, and fourth series were too small for tests of statistical significance to be meaningful. In the first series of experiments, the pH of the injected control solution was in the alkaline range, whereas the pH of the injected ATP solution was in the acid range. As a result, one wonders if the statistically signi- ficant data obtained in the first series of experiments are a result of the acidity of the ATP solution or of some other property inherent in the ATP molecule, such as its high energy transfer potential. Acidity plays a role in 8.8. Lillie's (1954) theory of activatiOn, but this theory is based on observations on artificial parthenogenesis in marine invertebrate eggs. Sea urchin eggs have been successfully activated by acid treatment (Loeb, 1915), whereas successful cleavage has not been obtained through such treatment of frog eggs. Anderson (1956) has proposed a general theory in which he suggests that polyelectrolyte balance is important in sol-gel trans- formations. According to this concept, a shift of the poly- electrolytes toward polyanions premotes solation and a shift toward polycations promotes gelation. A shift toward poly- cations and hence toward gelation would be favored by a drop in pH. However, this author is not aware of any evidence indicating that acidity, per 33, would have any stimulatory -41- effect in cell division in the eggs of amphibians. If the acid pH of the ATP solution were of signifi— cance, one would expect the results obtained to be the same when injecting an ATP solution and a buffer control of simi- lar pH. It was noted, however, that in the second series of experiments, with special reference to the eggs of frog XI, where injections were made two hours after activation, the ATP did show some positive effect in enhancing cleavage. The percentage of fertilized eggs injected with ATP two hours after fertilization which cleaved was about 16% greater than the percentage of control eggs which cleaved when injected with Niu-Twitty buffer two hours after fertilization. With regard to the eggs of frog XI, which were injected two hogrs after having been smeared with blooa and pricked, it was found that the ratio of the percentage of eggs injected with TP which cleaved to the percentage injected with Niu-Twitty buffer which cleaved was greater than 2.5. A slight increase in the percentage of cleavazes of those eggs injected with ATP over the percentage of those controls injected with Steinberg's medium is also apparent in the results recorded in Tables 4A and 48. On the basis of the literature summarized in the first paragraph of this discussion, it is tempting to theorize that ATP mediates in the sol-gel transformations involved in the scheme of cell division in amphibian eggs as formu- lated by Selman and Waddington (1955) and in the formation and functioning of the mitotic apparatus. If one regards -42- the pH discrepancies of the first series of experiments in the present investigation as insignificant, then the results of this first series in addition to those of the second and fourth series, though inconclusive, are not in contradiction with the above conjecture, although the precise mode of action is undefined. If ATPase is present in the mitotic apparatus of amphibian eggs as it is in the mitotic apparatus of the sea urchin egg (ihzia, Chaffee, and Iverson, 1961), it is possible that ATP injected into the interior of the egg may serve as an added energy source for the functioning of the mitotic spindle in chromosome movements. Rough calculations indicate that the amount of ATP injected into the egg introduced added energy of the order of 10'9 keel/egg. Calculations based on labile phosphate determinations made by Barth and Jaeger (1947) on early cleavage stages (Shumway stages 4-7) of 3. pipiens indicate that the energy available in the form of ATP (or ADP) is of the order of 10"8 to 10"9 kcal/egg. Thus the injection of ATP as performed in this study is likely to involve a 50- 1003 increase in the energy available to the egg. Caution is advisable, however, with regard to interpretations con- cerning the affect of ATP, since the present study did not investigate the possibility that AMP might be as effective as ATP. This possibility must be eliminated before the results obtained can be attributed to the high energy moiety of ATP. Although the literature reviewed in this paper does -43- indicate a role involving ATP in the sol-gel transformations involved in cell cleavage and in the movements of the spindle, good experimental data elucidating the nature of the mecha- nisms involved are lacking. Lilewise, information has not been obtained with regard to the mechanisms involving ATP in the present investigation. Perhaps a systematic biochemical and biophysical analysis of model gel systems might provide some irteresting results with regard to the precise nature of the role played by ATP. In View of the above considerations, how can one account for the results obtained in the third series of experiments (Tables 3A and SB)? In this series the percen- tages of eggs, particularly those of frog XIV, which cleaved when injected with ATP were lower than the percentages which cleaved when injected with Steinberg's medium (control). The only explanation which seems feasible at this time involves the assumption that the amount of ATP injected into the eggs was in supraOptimal quantities. Supraoptiwal concen- trations f ATP are known to cause motile protein structures to eldngate (Hoffmann-Berling, 1960). 'Under these condi- tions these same structures are unable to contract. Thus the postulated contraction of the spindle might be inhibi- ted. Furthermore, if contractiai is involved in the round- ing up of a cell prior to cleavage (Selman and Waddington, 1955), supraOptimal concentrations of ATP may indirectly prevent cleavare by inhibiting the general cell surface contraction leading to the rounding up of the cell. -44- From this discussion it should be obvious that more extensive data are needed before any conclusions can be drawn with regard to the effectiveness of ATP in the enhancement of cleavage initiation in frog eggs. The speculations put forth in this discussion not only accentuate the limitations of this investigation, but also offer a number of interesting avenues of approach for the further investigation and clari- fication of this problem. SU IJLIARY There is a considerable literature concerned with the intracellular action of adenosine triphosphate. Mach of it is particularly concerned with the role played by ATP in cell division. On the basis of the previous work reviewed in this paper, it was of interest to the present author to observe what effect, if any, ATP injected into parthenogenetically stimulated frog eggs would have on the number which success- fully cleaved to the blastula stage. The percentage of eggs in each experiment which cleaved following injection with ATP (1.61 x 10‘5M) was compared with a control batch from the same frog in which the eggs were injected with Kin-Tuitty or Steinberg buffer. Phe design of the experiments was such that in some cases (Tables 1 and 3) the injection of the buffer or ATP into eggs smeared with blood effected the parthenogenetic activation whereas in others (Tables 2 and 4) the injection was made approxi- mately two hours after the eggs had been stimulated either by fertilization or by pricking blood-smeared eggs with a fine glass needle. In all cases the percentage of control blood-smeared eggs injected with buffer which cleaved was less than the percentage of cleavages obtained by simply pricking blood- smeared eggs. Similarly treated eggs, when injected with ATP, also cleaved to a lesser extent than the pricked controls in three out of the four series of experiments (Tables 1A, 5A, and 4A). Cleavages occurred in these ATP-injected eggs -45- -45- more frequently, however, than cleavages in the eggs injected with buffer in three of the four series of experiments (Tables 1A, 2A, and 4A). These results seem to indicate that the ATP functioned in some way in aiding the egg in overcoming injury it had incurred as a result of the injection procedure. The failure to maintain a proper pH in the control injections in one series of experiments and the small sample sizes in the subsequent three series of experiments prevent the author from drawing any definite conclusions with regard to the effectiveness of ATP in enhancing cleavage. There are indications, however, that ATP may be important and with this in mind, several possible modes of action for ATP are discussed. H . H 0H m o-H-.-_ -_ n w:o- H H HH 0 .+lwmw -,- - -.:eonmmmxuz-n- __ - 4. H NOH -HHH_- - ; . W H.H-H.-.,. HHH. -HH- HH. HHH. - - - HHHHHH-Hi-HH w m HH Ho w J H HH 0 m o w Ho 4 HH>HmHo _ ‘ . - ,.mmHn;m0HH, . ..H mm H «OH -HH- om Hamm- %: -- -mHHHoHH HHH.> m n M NH u w _ l W ¢ w n v o . med M Umbmoao _H--.--.-.HH-,. -HHHH - HH- HHHH HH- HH-HH-H... - - HHHHHHHEHHHL “ Hm H o _ Hm , 0 HH _ H an H HopaoHo --e- H mnHH HnH»-:-.H :.H:mmH HmH :0m-ixwm:H;mwm H - eoHHHHH H»! n _ H l mH H o _ m m o H o Hm o ” mmm_ HHHHHHH tion..:oH---HHHH om “.mmHHmH M‘mHH -HH - me. ,HH Hgmwm- - - :{I-meHHHH - p _ m H o NH m o M NH . o W H 0 HH 0 con eH>HHHo r1mmyH:mHH mmHH mm -HwHH;mH.M.OHH -Hm- mHH om , Han wwwmwmwuai>w . mH H 0 mm H 0 mm H o H a H a 0 won _ em>HoHo . «ImmHH-Hm--mHH-moeH-HmHH,eo- _ mmHH- HOHr ©©--mHH--Hmn.H HHHHWHH-;HHH H . u l _ m H w 0 mm 0 HH 0 Ho . HHHHHHH H H . _rmmr 3L- OHHH- mHH_ HH w m-H: Hm- - HHHHHHH-i HHL _ w V H H H 0 mm . o a o . Hm em>moHo u. H H - .1_:HoH,.mHH-0HHH.mHH.-om- Hw:- pH- L.!.:HHHHmmH izH m w u _ H . _ l _ w H w Hid H v o . P H o m P o P _ o n ._ , .10 H T _ :J T . :J T H :J I _ n A n H A n . A n r r. a . . T. 3 TH . 3 T; H 9 Tie 98 H 9 "HQ , _ dh dh Hdh f df. d be _ v .. :P at :P.et ’P_et sf 9.1., ..e ”Z ._ _ _dT ri dT_r.l dT.r.l du rulddmrdui H H wmA MW mA.ww eAmww mb wbwmw.%m_fl monm . _ 9n m. ah m. ah mm..?n mhuac.mcut H H. at 8.3 etHSj at 3.3 at Stnei Sinr H _mi Hun mi nn mi nm mm. nu_mr nrue _ fl . flaw 1LT; ng , Ti H5 W flu H5 V UV? HQHP. "Unifl_F T- - t- .1..-..-I|:.. ..--. If}! I - . I ,~ 8+- - H . - . . .H t .. ---II .-. - . :L c L lil‘ Tali-1! 1|an it 1 - Hm. o HH.o HHo.o g ._ . -.-.i....-. 5!.-- ---.-uI--I!-}!-.i-: i. i u- - . . l.-- . - . - --H .hpomopwo node QH owwpm wHSHmeQ esp op Um>moao noHna paw common» ones goHne mmwo Ho muonezq onw mHHOHUHH manwp can :H mosaw> .Hm. etc. 0 may cOHHHHoH HHH Hem. 0 Ho H. o Ho. 0 no Hm. -o. H mgv HHHHHQ.HHHH;H st Ho COHpoonnH on» ana msomcprSEHm Goapm>Hpo¢ .NH IH mmonh EOHH «pan «H xHUGomm< - 47.. -;mm.@ 4 ‘ 1.. . _ o _ flea“ HH u ,Embar:om!wsowm+20¢am .0 ~O t 00.: b m v-0mHI;HHH:toHH om.» d " _.. e 9 d .V... d? e C “ eem k ".1 n. kfir.w CP _PPJ P Cf «QLUPT_ n; in rA. A :A .rb P v; ,d _P h _dh.eh_fl h 3E et zt _ .10 d1 _ri .ii Wdi 8W _8W ”.1W q6W~ r e .1 pr H, a Cum 0 _t o a 0“ mn _nn_€n _mn“ SI mUI_fiI41.I SI t mad ma.o go Ao.m mmv magmas hppflaeusfiz o _ moa_ m on f-mbfiramma m . mHHM HH _ -:moa-:mmeuwm.s » T 4. , _ _ d H w A C _ _ kr. r. Ge” 6_ _ if f. . S; : .PU. um b 9b.. : d Hdh eh. et zt : ,ri 1.1 wdd aw 1w ,ee 8 .1 wrk m. t. “ac S:J rj.e.l nn en Hmr 4. o _ mad. wwpwmfio :moHrEbmH&ll:|!J5l!UopmmpwiinMW‘ o M ova wo>wmfio W mm;_ >>H+ua., ,!-euwpmmmp- I!x1 . 8 A; H W _ H, _d m d e h e Z , ”mm "n wopm ek __i _ mmc wt , 8.1 r nr *8 U“: _F g .mnommpmo comm SH mmwum wHSpmmHQ 03p on Umpwmao gowns ncm Uopmomp mums moans mmmm mo muongzc ms» mmeflvQH mapmp on» 2H mmsaw> uncapm>fipom pmumw mason m psopw wouommmfi Am.w mmv soapsaom MHN Una x mMOhQ song Guam “HH KH©Can¢ m w o _ NH _ H m am 0 h OOH_ cm>mofio .1... m _ I ,mmw A u w _ b M _ {Eris TEN 84381 +8 M 23m. .5 ,-.-,...§§$S--ifli . ._ H w m ., _ , “w M “ w V _ w m . w . . . i _....d w H _ _ _ o P o n m H ”.10 . T .j I _ _ m I w ’ .I e 9 e 0: d a .d .L w fll d .T. d w e . :P . e t n 9f e f s e A Z _dT _ri mdu rm. dd rd ”.1 _ 3 ~GA .awweb ab _ee 88 ”l bomb a h... H m o m a h m h a C m C ”t at Siamet St 6.1 Si ”r ” $1 nnumi n:; mr nrue M .aw UTizaw Uw -3r UP 1‘ m “I . 3-1i - ........ 1 .L m i!!! 1;:;arii.i- .hpommpwo Some CH omwpm wazpmwan mg» on umbmoao gowns cam Umummmu one; Sofia; mmmo mo mumpggs mnp oumOHUQH magma onp CH mmzam> ”Amo.m may COHpsfiom m9< wa.o no Amm.o mav asfigma m.mpopcflopm mo qofipoomqfi 02p spa; msoouwpasafim QOHpm>Huod M>HN flaw HHHx mmonm Eonm wpwa "HHH Kfiucmmm¢ :III: 1‘ ’ II lat. 1 H u o ” pm 1 o . H m mHHW HH.H o m mamW uo>mmHo # MHH. no 1 mHH HHE. om .amHH. om _ mm w m m1 wmpmmnm-- HHHH TI, w ”:11. I).-|.+. ....T- 1%.... - ..-IL$.III§ -x..- .I .III ma _ o _ mm m OH 1 o m Hu m ow _ o 1 mHH_ Uo>woao;- anLim H Immwwioma HnH.“ HHHLIHm.M.Ou 1 OMH 1 Umpwopp HHK A _ _ « H _ . _ . _ , _ . , _ .3 _ 1 _ 1 M m a r _ d M m 1 M . _. .d wk “ W..Qw.....Kw.._ r_ M f q _ _e “c _ 86 Ge. 8, H , w _ “k .1 kf Olaf... f. M _cPurP. n; of rf 91m _ _ 1 __iTmPT. T iu Pu u. _ _ h ””15““ A ’A rb b !b_ _ _ “P. u 3 Au D1 : V.a _ . 9 .a w _ h.dh eh h dh eh_ ”d e ”oftwet Zt 9t at Zt_1 “e Z 1. “dihri .11 di r1 .1.1 ,ddflrd .1 w, Mopm _ewbawmlw Ow aw lw_ee.ae l w P ”r _ e :1 n; e .1 MHLk ”oyk 1. U _ a . r . .t . a . m . _t . “a c “mmc +u " . ?J 83 riua:JHiJ {Jwei~si r , H mun nun .avn mun nun avn _mmr knur .e , SI UIHFI SI UIHFI_SPMUP F _ W I 5— ,_ __ l.— .hpoMmumo nomo SH owmpm mHSpmme 05p on w®>wmao Scans Ucw Umpmopp mums SOHSS mwmo mo mpmnedc on» mponUGH manmp mSp CH mmsam> .COpr>Huow Houww mazes N psopw no Amm. w mmv SSHUmE m wnmncwoum cmuomHaHHmw. m mgv moHHSHom mHH HH.o .HHHx and HHK macaw Eonq mpmm .>H KHUQme« -50- LITERATLRE CITED Anderson, N. G. 1956. Cell division I: A theoretical approach to the primeval mechanism, the initiation of cell division, and chromosomal condensation. Quart. Rev. Biol., 51: 169. Barnett, R. C. 1955. Cell division inhibition of Arhacia and ChaetOpterus eggs and its reversal by Krebs cycIe intermediates and certain phosphate compounds. Biol. Bull., 193: 265. Barth, L. G. and Jaeger, L. 1947. The apyrase activity of various protein fractions of the frog's egg. J. Cell. Comp. Physiol., 59: 111. Bataillon, E. 1911. Les deux facteurs de la par henogenESe traumatique chez les amphibiens. C. R. Acad. Sci., 152: 920. (Read in translation) Bataillon, E. 1919. Analyse de 1’activation par la tech- nique des oeufs nus et la polyspermie expérimentale chez les batraciens. Ann. des Sci. Nat. at 2001., lOmme serie, g: 1. (Read in translation) Bataillon, E. 1929. Analyse de la fécondation par la parthenogénése expérimentale. Roux' Archiv f. Entwicklungs. d. Organ., 115: 707. (Read in translation) Brachet, J. 1950. Chemical Embryology, Second Edition. Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York. Brachet, J. '1957. Biochemical Cytology. Academic Press, N8 W York 0 Clowes, G., Keltch, A. K., Strittmatter, C. F., and Walters, C. P. 1950. Action of nitro- and halophenols upon oxygen consumption and phosphorylation by a cell-free particulate system from Arbacia eggs. J. Gen. Physiol., 55: 55‘. De Robertis, E., Nowinski, W., and Saez, F. 1960. General Cytology, Third Edition. W. B. Saunders Co., Pliladelpnia. Einsele, W. 1930. Entwicklungserregung von Froscheiern durch Injektion zellfreier'Crganextrakte. Roux' Archiv f. Entwicklungs. d. Organ., 125: 279.‘ Ferry, J. D. 1948. Protein gels. Adv. in Protein Chem., 4: 1. -51- -52- Fisher, R. A. 1950. Statistical Kethods for Research Workers, Eleventh Edition. Hafner Publishing Co., New Eork, pp. 117, 121-122. Frazier, R. L. 1951. A cytological and cytochemical study of parthenogenetic embryos of Rana pipiens. Haster's Thesis, University of Missouri (Unpublished). Green, D. E. 1960. Structure and function in the mito- chondrial electron-transport system. Radiation Research, Suppl. 3: 504. Gross, P. R. and Spindel, W. 1960. Heavy water inhibition of cell division: an approach to mechanism. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 22: 500. Harding, C. V. 1951. The action of certain polysaccharides on fertilization in the sea urchin egg. Exptl. Cell Research, 2: 405. Harding, D. 1949. Effect of heparin on artificial activa- tion in the frog egg. Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biol. and 1116311., 23-: 14. Harding, D. 195 . Effect of bacterial polysaccharide on artificial activation in the frog egg. Nature, 167: 555. Herlant, RR 1915. Etude sur’les bases cytologiques du mécanisme de la parthénogenESe expérimentale chez les amphibiens. Arch. de Biol., fig: 505. (Read in translation) Hoffmann-Berling, H. 1960. Other mechanisms producing movements. In Com arative Biochemistry: A Comprehensive Treatise, Vol. II, E. EIorkin afidJH} S. Eason, editors. Kcademi? Press, New YOrk, p. 541. Huggins, M. L. 1962. Physico-chemical aspects of hydrogen bonds and their application to biology. Am. Scientist, 50: 485. Hughes, A. 1952. Inhibitors and mitotic physiology. Symp. Soc, Exptl. Biol., 6: 256. Inoue, 3. 1959. motility of cilia and the mechanism of mitosis. In Biophysical Science- A Study Program, J. L. Oncley, editor. Wiley and“Sons, Inc., New—York, p. 402. Kopac, H. J. 1950. Physical prOperties of protOplasm. Ann. Rev. of Physiol.,.1§: 7. Krahl, H. E., Keltch, A. K., Neubeck, C. E., and Clones, G. 1941. Studies on cell metabolism and cell division V. Cytochrome oxidase activity in the eggs of Arbacia punctulata. J. Gen. Physiol., 24: 597. Kriszat, G. and Runnstrom, J. 1951. Some aspects tf adenosine triphosphate on the cytoplasmic state, division, and development of the sea urchin egg. Trans. N. Y. Acad. Sci., Ser. 2, 15: 162. Landau, J. V., Marsland, 3. A., and Zimmerman, A. M. 1954. Kinetics of cell division: Action of mcrsalyl acid on pressure-temperature cleavage block in the eggs of Arbacia and Chaetopterus. Anat. Record, 129; 789. Landau, J. V., Zimmerman, A. E., and Marsland, D. A. 1955. The energetics of cell division; effects of adenosine triphOSphate and related compounds on the furrowing capacity of marine eggs. J. Cell. Comp. Physiol., 45: 540. Lehninger, A. L. 1959. Respiratory-energy transformation. In Biophysical Science- A Study Program, J. L. Oncley, editor. Wiley afid SOnS, Inc., NeWJYbrk, p. 156. Lillie, R. S. 1954. The influence of hypertonic and hypotonic seaéwater on the artificial activation of starfish eggs. Biol. Bull., 65: 561. Lindberg, O. 1950. On the surface reaction in the sea urchin egg. Exptl. Cell Research, I: 105. Lipmann, R. 1941. Metabolic generation and utilization of phosphate bond energy. Adv. in Enzymology, 1: 99. Litchfield, J. B. and Whiteley, A. H. 1959. Studies on the mechanism of phosphate accumulation by sea urchin embryos. Biol. Bull. 117: 155. Lamb, J. 1915. Artificial Parthencgenesis and Fertili- zation. .University of‘Chicago Press, Chicago. Loomis, W. F. and Lipmann, F. 1948. Reversible inhibition of the coupling between phosphorylation and oxidation. J. Biol. Chem., 175: 807. Karsland, D. A. 1948. Protoplasmic contractility. Pressure experiments on the motility of living cells. Sci. Konthly, 61: 195. Karsland, D. A. 1956. ProtOplasmic contractility in rela- tion to gel structure. Temperature-pressure experiments on cytckinesis and amoeboid movement. Int. Rev. Cytology, 5: 99. Karsland, D. A. and Brown, D. 1942. The effects of pressure on sol—gel equilibria, with special reference to myosin and other protoplasmic gels. J. Cell. Comp. Physiol., 20: 295. -54- Karsland, D. A., Landau, J. V., and Zimmerman, A. M. 1955. Adenosine triphosphate as an energy source in cell division; pressure-temperature experiments on cleaving eggs of Arhacia and Chaetopterus. Biol. Eu11., 125: 566.'—_—-'—_ Harsland, D. A. and Landau, J. V. 1954. The mechanism of cell division; temperature-pressure experiments on the cortical gel system in various marine eggs. J. Exptl. 2001., 125: 507. Lhrsland, D. A., Zimmerman, A. n., and Auclair, W. 1950. Cell division: experimental induction of cleavage furrows in the eggs of Arbacia punctulata. Exptl. Cell Research, 21: 179. Nazi D. 1955. The organization of the mitotic apparatus. 3 ymp. Soc. Exptl. Biol., 9: 555. a S Hazia, 3., Chaffee, R. R., and Iverson, R. M. 1961. Adeno- sine triphosphatase in the mitotic apparatus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. 5., 31: 788. Nazis, D. and Dan, K. 1952. The isolation and biochemical characterization of the mitotic apparatus of dividing cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. 3.,‘52: 826. Hazia, D., Kitchison, J. M., Medina, E., and Harris, P. 1961. The direct isolation of the mitotic apparatus. J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol.,.19: 1. Me Elroy, W. D. 1947. Mechanism of inhibition of cellular activity by narcotics. Quart. Rev. Biol., 23: 25. The Merck Index of Chemicals and Drugs, Seventh Edition, P. G. Stecher, editor. Merck and Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, 1960, p. 21. Meyerhof, O. 1945. The origin of the reaction of Harden and Young in cell-free alcoholic fermentation. J. Biol. Chem., 157: 105. Konroy, A. 1957. An analysis of the process of fertili- zation and activation of the egg. Int. Rev. Cytology, 6: 107. Niu, M. C. and Twitty, V. C. 1955. The differentiation of gastrula ectoderm in medium conditioned by axial meso- derm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. 5., 59: 985. Pease, D. C. 1941. Hydrostatic pressure effects upon the spindle figure and chromosome movement. I. Experiments on the first meiotic division of Urechis eggs. J. Morph., 62: 405. -55- Pease, D. C. 1946. Hydrostatic pressure effects upon the spindle figure and chromosome movement. 11. Experi- ments on the meiotic diviSions of Tradescantia pollen mother cells. Biol. Bull., 61: 145. Ris, H. 1945. A quantitat1ve study of anaphase movement in the aphid Tamalia. Diol. Bull., 66: 164. Rothschild, Lord 1956. Fertilization. Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York. Rugh, R. 1954. Induced ovulation and artificial fertili- zation in the frog. Biol. Bull., 66: 22. Runnstrom, J. 1949. The mechanism of fertilization in ibtazoa. Adv. in Enzymology, 6: 241. Runnstrom, J. and Kriszat, d. 1950a. On the effect of ATP and Ca on the cytoplasm of the egg of the sea urchin, Psammechinus miliaris. Exptl. Cell Research, 1: 2840 Runnstrom, J. and Kriszat, 3. 19505. On the influence of ATP on the fertilization and segmentation of the sea urchin egg, Strongylocentrotus lividus. Exptl. Cell Research, 1: 497. Selman, G. G. and Waddington, C. H. 1955. The mechanism of cell division in the cleavage of the newt's egg. J. Exptl. Biol., 62: 700. Shaver, J. R. 1949. Experimental study of artificial parthenogenesis in the frog. Anat. Record, 105: 571. Shaver, J. R. 1955. Studies on the initiation of cleavage in the frog egg. J. Exptl. 2001., 122: 169. Shaver, J. R., Subtelny, S., and Wania, A. 1952. Studies on initiation of cleavage in the frog egg. Biol. Bull., 105: 282. Snedecor, G. W. 1955. Statistical Methods, Fourth Edition. Iowa State College Press, Ames, Iowa, pp. 45-45, 84-87. Steinberg, M. 1957. A non-nutrient culture medium for amphibian embryonic tissues. Carnegie Instit. of Wash. Year Book, 66: 547. Tyler, A. 1941. Artificial parthenogenesis. Camb. Phil. Soc. Biol. Rev., 16: 291. Villee,<3. A., Lowens, M., Gordon, E., Leoggrd, E., and Rich, A. 1949. The incorporation of P into the nucleoproteins and phOsphoproteins of the developing sea urchin embryo. J. Cell. Com}. Physiol., 55: 95. -55- Weber, H. H. 1955. The link between metabolism and moti- lity of cells and miscles. Symp. Soc. Exptl. Biol., 9: 271. \ Wolpert, L. 1958. Effect of adenosine triphosphate on cleavaje of sea urchin egjs. Nature, 191: 716. Wolpert, L. '1960. The mechanics and mechanism of cleavage. Int. Rev. Cytology, 12: 165. Wolpert, L. 1961. A mechanism of cell cleava e. Pathologie-Biologie, 9: 517. Wolpert, L. 1962. Personal communication. Zimmerman, A. E., Landau, J. V., and Larsland, D. A. 957. Cell division: A pressure-temperature analysis of the effects of sulfhydryl reagents on the cortical plasmo- gel structure and furrowing strength of dividing eggs, (Arbacia and Chaetopterus). J. Cell. Comp. Physiol., 49: 595. ”is”: w J MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES I 3|III3|3 3II3I3I|II|II|3||3I3II II