THE BIOACTIVATION 0F 'SLAFRAMINE Thesis for the Degree of M. S. MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY THOMAS E. SPiKE 1969 w —v——— LTBIMFLY THES‘S Michigan Scam University ABSTRACT THE BIOACTIVATION OF SLAFRAMINE By Thomas E. Spike Bioactivation of slaframine by rat liver microsomes has been demonstrated by its ability to stimulate contraction of the guinea pig ileum. The enzymatic bioactivation process has been shown to require reduced nicotinamide dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) but not oxygen and is induced by pretreating the animals with phenobarbital. The production of the active factor has also been accomplished nonenzymatically with various flavins in the presence of light. The active factor causes a prolonged contraction of the ileum by acting directly on the acetylcholine receptor with an apparent high affinity for the receptor. Its action is prevented by prior applica- tion of atropine, but is not reversed by atropine once administered. The metabolite has not been identified but its proper— ties have been studied. Even though EPR has not shown the presence of any free radicals, it is believed that the active metabolite is either an N-oxide or loss of one electron by the tertiary amine, both of which would give the nitrogen a positive charge. The active compound has been shown to be present at very low levels and is quite unstable as heat and Thomas E. Spike pH changes. The profound effects that are observed in animals treated with the active compound are described. In addition, some of the structural requirements for the observed response have been determined. THE BIOACTIVATION OF SLAFRAMINE By Thomas E. Spike A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Biochemistry 1969 (,1 5.9735722 /c7 223 {0? ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to express appreciation to Dr. Steven D. Aust under whose guidance this research was conducted. The author also wishes to thank Dr. John E. Wilson, Dr. Clarence H. Suelter, Patricia Darby, and the members of Dr. Aust's laboratory for their suggestions and assistance. 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES . . . . . . w. . . . . . LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS . . . . . . . . .. . INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITERATURE '. . . . . METHODS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chemicals . . . . . . . . . Gas-Liquid Chromatography . . . . . . . . Thin-Layer Chromatography . . . . . . . . Preparation of Slaframine-3H Acetate . . . . . Animals . . . . . . . . . . Preparation of Microsomes . . . . . . . . Aminopyrine Demethylase Assay . . . . . . . Hexobarbital Hydroxylation Assay . . . . Guinea Pig Ileum Bioassay . . . . . Partition Chromatography Assay for Acetate . . . Perfusion Solutions . . . . _. . . . . . RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Attempts to Isolate a Metabolite of Slaframine Metabolism of 3H(Acetate)-Slaframine by the Perfused Rat Liver . . . . Metabolism of Slaframine by Rat Liver Microsomes Localization of the Enzyme Responsible for the Metabolism of Slaframine . . . . . . Stability of the Active Metabolite . . . . Cofactor Requirements . . . . . . The Non-Enzymatic Production of the Slaframine Metabolite . . . . Stability of the Metabolite Produced by FMN and Light . . . . . . . . . 111 Page ii vi viii 12 12 l6 16 18 25 25 26 27 32 33 35 37 37 142 A5 53 56 57 58 68 Page Pharmacological Effects of Activated Slaframine . . 72 Biological Activity of Structurally Related Analogues . . . . 75 EPR Studies of the Metabolite Produced by FMN . . 76 DISCUSSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 iv LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Thin Layer Chromatography of Slaframine and Its Derivatives . . . . . . . . 2. Activation of Slaframine by Rat Liver Fractions . . . . . . . . . . . 3. Effect of Various Cofactors on the Microsomal Activation of Slaframine . . . . . . Page . l7 . . 56 . . 58 Figure l. 2. 3. 10. ll. 12. 13. 1“. 150 LIST OF FIGURES Mass Spectrum of l-acetoxy-octahydroindolizine . TLC of 3H-(acetate)-Slaframine . . . . TLC of 3H-(acetate)-Slaframine . . . . . . Activity vs Time for Aminopyrine Demethylase Assay with Rat Liver Microsomes . . . . Velocity vs Protein Concentration for Aminopyrine Demethylase Assay by Rat Liver Microsomes . . . . . . . . . . Metabolism of Hexobarbital by the Perfused Rat Liver O O O O O O O O O O Metabolism of 3H-(acetate)- Slaframine by the Perfused Rat Liver . . . . . Metabolism of Slaframine by Microsomes . . Dose vs Response for the Metabolite Produced by Microsomes . . . . . . . . Time Course Assay of the Production of Metabolite by Rat Liver Microsomes . . Ability of Various Subcellular Fractions to Metabolize Slaframine . . . . . Dependence of the Nonenzymatic Production of the Metabolite with FAD upon Time . . . Dependence of the Production of Metabolite on the Concentration of FMN . . . . . . . Dose versus Response for the Nonenzymatically Produced Metabolite . . . . . . . . . Reciprocal Plot of Dose vs Response for Slaframine in Live Rats . . . . . . . . vi Page 1A 21 23 28 30 no "3 us “9 51 54 6O 62 6M 66 Figure 16. 17. Decay of the Active Metabolite in the Dark The Pharmacological Effects of the Active Metabolite of Slaframine . . . . . vii Page 70 73 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS NADP = nicotinamide dinucleotide phosphate NADPH = nicotinamide dinucleotide phosphate, reduced NAD = nicotinamide dinucleotide NADH = nicotinamide dinucleotide, reduced FAD = flavin adenine dinucleotide FMN = flavin mononucleotide THF tetrahydrofolic acid GLC gas-liquid chromatography TLC = thin-layer chromatography DPEA 2,N-dichloro (6-pheny1phenoxy) ethylamine QD = optical density i.p. = intraperitoneally i.v. intraveineously viii INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF LITERATURE During the early 1950's, there were a number of reports throughout the Midwest of excessiVe salivation by cattle which had been fed certain legumes (l). Cattle eating these forages would refuse further feed after one to three feedings. This presented a significant economic problem due to the decrease in production as well as the cost of replacing the forages. In 1958, when the reports reaching the Agricultural Experiment Station in Illinois became so numerous, Byers and Broquist initiated a study of these "slobber forages" (2, 3). The most severe outbreak of this problem was reported in 1959 in Missouri where animals displayed additional symptoms ’ including diarrhea, bloat, stiff Joints and, occasionally, death (A). Smalley 92 a1. (5) and Crump 33 a1. (6) observed that the forages were usually red clover and, a1though they did not visibly display any mold, proved upon microscopic examination to be infested with the heavy mycelium of a dark brown- colored fungus. They, furthermore, showed the fungus to be Rhizoctonia leguminicola. Aust gt a1. (7) were able to grow pure cultures of Rhizoctonia leguminicola on cold water extracts of red clover hay and showed the production of the salivation factor by the fungus. Salivation factor activity was assayed by injecting extracts of the mature mycelium into guinea pigs via intra- peritoneal injections and following the degree of salivation which ensued. They were successful in crystallizing the picrate salt of this factor from ethanol and named it "Slaframine." The structure and absolute stereochemistry were determined from information obtained by nuclear magnetic resonance, infrared, and mass spectroscopy. The alkaloid was found to be l-acetoxy-6-aminoocta—hydroindolizine (8, 9). The biosynthesis of Slaframine by Rhizoctonia legumini- cola was studied with various luC-precursors (7). Only lysine and serine were found to be incorporated. Portions of the biosynthetic pathway have since been determined (10). It has been suggested that cystic fibrosis syndrome may be caused by nonfunctioning of cholinergic nerve fibers, since the glandular sites involved are predominately supplied by fibers coming from the parasympathetic nervous system. Clini- cal symptoms of cystic fibrosis are malfunction of mucous— secreting membranes resulting in irritation followed by a toughening of these membranes to a fibrous tissue. Sufferers of the disease lack sufficient pancreatic enzymes to utilize dietary protein and, thus, suffer from malnutrition. The exocrine glands are stimulated by cholinergic drugs, and the use of these compounds has, therefore, been studied with regard to therapy. However, the side effects of cholinergic drugs makes their use almost impossible. The specificity with which Slaframine stimulates exocrine gland function without affecting other vital body functions, such as heart rate (11), eliminates the problems associated with the use of other parasympathomimetic agents for the treatment of cystic fibrosis. The administration of Slaframine to animals results in sustained secretory activity by exocrine glands (12). For example, studies on the pancreas following admin- istration of Slaframine have shown that Slaframine increases the activity of the digestive enzymes and maintains a high level of secretion for prolonged periods of time (11). In all studies with the compound $2.21X2: there was invariably a substantial delay before the onset of salivation, and no activity was seen with $2.!ifii2 test systems (12). This suggested that the compound might have to be metabolized to an active form (12). Evidence that the liver was the site of activation of Slaframine was obtained by injecting the com- pound directly into the portal vein which resulted in a faster response than when it was given into the inferior vena cava (13). Furthermore, when Slaframine was given into the inferior vena cava, all activity could be prevented by first ligating the portal vein (13). Evidence that the bioactivation pro- cess was being accomplished by the drug-metabolizing enzymes of the liver was obtained by pretreating animals with com- pounds which are known to induce drug-metabolizing activity in liver microsomes and, thus, decrease the lag time. Likewise, the delay could be increased by giving known inhibitors of drug-metabolizing systems. Goats, which are excellent metabolizers of xenobiotics, have a much shorter period of delay prior to the onset of salivation than does a calf which has much less ability to alter drugs (12, 13). The biotransformation of most drugs occurs mainly in the liver, but may also take place in plasma, kidney, and other tissues. Drugs are eliminated from the body either unchanged or as metabolites. Generally, the more polar com- pounds are excreted unchanged. The less polar, lipid-soluble compounds must be transformed before elimination can take place. There are two main types of transformations accom- plished in the liver, nonsynthetic and synthetic. {Nonsynthetic reactions include oxidations, reductions, or hydrolysis and may result in activation, change in activity, or inactivation of the parent drug. Synthetic reactions involve conjugations between the drug or its metabolite and an endogenous substrate that is usually a carbohydrate, an amino acid, or derivatives of these. Synthetic reactions almost invariably result in inactivation and excretion of the parent drug. These transformations have been shown to be carried out by certain enzymes which are associated with the endoplasmic reticulum of a number of tissues particularly the liver (1A). This enzyme system has been classified as a mixed- function oxidase system according to the terminology of Mason (15) because of its requirement for NADPH and molecular oxygen. The highest level of enzymic activity is found in the lipoprotein membrane fragments, particularly those of the smooth endoplasmic reticulum (16). Synthesis of the enzymes appears to occur in rough reticulum, but this, when saturated with enzyme, appears to lose its ribosomes to become smooth reticulum (17). The amount of enzymes present can be increased by chronic administration of various compounds. Recent studies have shown that benzpyrene hydroxylase activity is increased by phenothiazines and polycyclic hydrocarbons in organ and tissue cultures, indicating the lack of hormonal control of the induction process (18, 19). Many foreign compounds stimulate their own metabolism of other drugs. Among these are phenylbutazone, chlorcyclizine, probenecid, tOlbutamide, hexobarbital, pentobarbital, phenobarbital, aminopyrine, meprobamate, glutethimide, chlorpromazine, chlordiazepoxide, DDT, methoxyflurane, 3,H-benzpyrene and 9,10-dimethyl-1,2- A benzanthracene (20). Many chemicals in our environment also stimulate the metabolism of drugs and other foreign substances. These include insecticides, cigarette smoke, and some poly— cyclic hydrocarbons found in polluted city air. Treatment of animals with such inducing agents increases the apparent concentration of the cytochrome P-USO, the oxygen-activating component of the mixed-function oxidases (21, 22). Just as the mixed-function oxidase system can be induced by various compounds it can also be inhibited. Inhibition can occur either competitively or noncompetitively. The microsomal enzyme system is rather nonspecific, and frequently one drug will competitively inhibit the metabolism of another which bears no structural resemblance to the inhibitor (23). This is difficult to understand in view of the common concept of substrate specificity found in other enzyme systems. Many drugs which are effective inhibitors in ig_xitgg studies fail to have an inhibitory effect in vivg (2h). Conceivably, the failure of these drugs to inhibit in X$XQ could be due to failure of these drugs to reach effective concentrations at the metabolic site (2N). Support to this idea has been obtained by using an isolated liver perfusion system. Ethyl- morphine, codeine, morphine, and diphenylphenoxyvalerate (SKF-525A) will inhibit the metabolism of hexobarbital in the perfused liver, whereas only the first two of these are effec- tive in XlXQ inhibitors of its metabolism (2“). Some compounds have been shown to preferentially inhibit the metabolism of certain drugs while having little or no effect on the metabolism of others (25). An example of this is 2,N-dichloro(6-phenylphenoxy)ethylamine (DPEA). Various steroids have also been shown to be alternative sub- strates for a common microsomal mixed-function oxidase and, thus, competitively inhibit the alteration of certain drugs such as ethylmorphine and hexobarbital (26). They have also been shown to be less potent inhibitors of chlorpromazine oxidation and inhibition was not competitive (27). Carbon monoxide, which binds to cytochrome P-hSO with a greater affinity than molecular oxygen will inhibit, non- competitively, the metabolism of those drugs which use P-hSO in their terminal oxidation step (28). The hepatic mixed-function oxidase system has proved too labile for solubilization or separation of its components, but a hemoprotein known as the CO-binding pigment or cyto— chrome P—HSO (32) has been shown to be involved in the termi- nal oxidation step of the metabolism of drugs. P-NSO was discovered by Klingenberg (29) and Garfinkel (30) and was partially characterized by Omura and Sato (31). In its reduced form, cytochrome P-450 has an affinity for carbon monoxide, although the normal ligand is oxygen (1“, 32). P—U5O is found in the microsomes of liver and the mitochondria of adrenal cortex, but brain and skeletal muscle are devoid of this cytochrome (17). When foreign compounds are added to hepatic microsomes, certain spectral changes occur, indicating that the compounds have interacted with a microsomal pigment, probably cytochrome P-NSO. Two types of spectral change occur, one exemplified by that induced by phenobarbital, aminopyrine, or the inhibitor, SKF-525A and the other seen with such substrates as aniline or the inhib- itor, DPEA (33). This suggests that there are two different cytochromes with different substrate specificities and is in agreement with an observation that pretreatment of rats with methylcholanthrene produces a hepatic microsomal cytochrome (Pl-NSC) which appears to contain only one of two components of the normal cytochrome (P-ASO) (35). A similar system, the steroid hydroxylating system of beef adrenal cortex mitochondria, has been solubilized and separated into a flavoprotein NADPH-diaphorase, a non-heme iron protein, and cytochrome P-ASO (33). The electron trans- port system involved in the liver microsomal system has con- sequently been formulated (on the basis of what is known about the adrenal system) as follows (3U): Puso (Fe+2)-CO co Tl by 02 Puso \N‘W NADPH .pro- >(:: :3 (1:8an) (me A) 131502 (eF +2)'o pr NADP+ . PA50.¢’//// RCH3 teinp (Fe+3) RCH OH 2 fp = flavoprotein The second area of interest in the bioactivation of Slaframine is its site of action, the cholinergic nervous system. The action of cholinergic, or parasympathomimetic, drugs is to augment or duplicate the effects of stimulating a parasympathetic nerve. This class of drugs consists of those agents which directly stimulate effector cells, such as pilocarpine, arecoline, muscarine, and certain choline esters, and those which inhibit acetylcholinesterase and thus permit the acetylcholine released to persist in its action (eserine, neostigmine, and many others). The relationship between chemical structure and biolo- gical activity is particularly fascinating with regard to cholinergic drugs. The chemical grouping which is common to drugs having direct effect on cholinergic receptors consists of a nitrogen atom to which three or four methyl groups are attached. As in the case of ammonium or quaternary ammonium ions, such a chemical grouping carries a net positive charge. Because phosphorus and arsenic have nuclear properties which are similar to nitrogen, the tetramethylphosphonium and tetramethylarsonium ions also have cholinergic properties. Choline is the simplest methonium compound which occurs naturally and is a member of the B vitamin family. It can act at cholinergic sites but very large, unphysiological quantities are required. The acetate ester of choline is the normal chemical mediator of cholinergic nerves. It has been estimated that this substance is effective at cholinergic receptors at concentrations as low as 10-9 molar. This makes it one of the most potent physiological substances known. Acetylcholine is rapidly hydrolyzed by acetylcholin- esterase. The physiological role of acetylcholinesterase is to terminate the transmitter action of acetylcholine at the junctions of various cholinergic nerve endings with their effector organs. Drugs that inhibit or inactivate acetylcho- linesterase are called "anticholinesterases." They cause 10 acetylcholine to accumulate at cholinergic sites and, thus, are capable of producing effects equivalent to continuous stimulation of cholinergic fibers. Physostigmine, also called "eserine" (an alkaloid obtained from the seed of Physostigma venenosum) is perhaps the most common anticholinesterase. Its pharmacoligical properties were investigated by Christionson (36), Fraser (37), and Argyll-Robertson (38). The elucidation of the chemical basis of the activity of eserine was accomplished by Stedman (39). Binding studies have shown that even though eserine binds to the active site of acetylcholinesterase reversibly, only a negligible amount of the inhibitor is released from the enzyme due to the extremely slow hydrolysis of its ester moiety by the cholinesterase (HO). Atropine is‘a highly selective antagonist of cholinergic agents on smooth and cardiac muscle and exocrine gland cells. Th1; antagonism is so selective for cholinergic agents that atropine blockade of the action of other types of drugs has been taken as evidence that they act indirectly through cholinergic mechanisms (H0). Atropine, which binds reversibly with specific acetyl- choline receptors, has a much higher affinity for the receptor molecule than acetylcholine. Thus, the effects of acetyl- choline can readily be reversed by atropine (40). Studies on Slaframine thus far have indicated its potential value as both a medicinal and research tool. The ll bioactivation of such an unusual compound is intriguing in itself, but the understanding of the complete mechanism by which it acts so selectively is the ultimate goal. The com- prehension of the mode of action necessitates knowing what the active species is and how to handle it. It was therefore the intent of this thesis to isolate and identify the active form of Slaframine and to determine some of its chemical properties. Localization and characterization of the enzyme system responsible for the bioactivation process were also intended. METHODS Chemicals Aminopyrine and hexobarbital were purchased from K and . -... ,5 K Laboratories, Inc., Plainview, N. Y. Phenobarbital was purchaSed from Merck and Co., Inc., Rahway, N. J. NADPH, NADP+, FAD, FMN, riboflavin, NADH, NAD+, tetrahydrofolic acid, biopterin, and folic acid were all purchased from Sigma g; Co., St. Louis, Mo. Tritiated acetic anhydride was purchased from Amersham/Searle Corporation, Des Plaines, Illinois. Carbon monoxide was obtained from Matheson Co., Inc., Joliet, Illinois. Acetylcholine iodide, eserine sulfate, pilocarpine HCl, atropine sulfate (monohydrate) were all purchased from Cal Bio Chem, Los Angeles, California. Slaframine was iso- lated from Rhizoctoria leguminicola in our laboratory by the method of Aust, gt al.(7). Slaframine was repeatedly recrystallized as the dipicrate before converting to the dicitrate for use. Conversion to the dicitrate was accom- plished by dissolving the dipicrate in .01 N HCl and extracting the picric acid out with diethyl ether. The pH was then raised to 10 and the solution was extracted with two volumes of purified chloroform. The chloroform extract was dried over sodium sulfate and removed under vacuo. The residue was 12 13 dissolved in a minimum amount of dry diethyl ether and added to a saturated solution of citric acid in diethyl ether. The precipitate was washed with diethyl ether and dried under vacuo. 8-Aminooctahydroindolizine and l—hydroxyoctatydro- indolizine were compliments of Robert Gardener, Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois. l-Acetoxyoctahydroindolizine was synthesized by reflux- ing 50 mg of l—hydroxyoctahydroindolizine in 10 ml of acetic anhydride and 10 ul of pyridine for one hour. The reaction mixture was then mixed with 50 ml of 0.1 N HCl and extracted with an equal volume of chloroform. The pH was then raised to 10 with sodium carbonate and the solution was extracted twice with equal volumes of chloroform. The chloroform was dried and removed under vacuo. Gas chromatography of the product showed one peak and the structure of l-acetoxyoctahy- droindolizine was confirmed by mass spectrometry (Figure l). N-Acetylslaframine was synthesized by the following method. The crude pH 10 chloroform extract from the isolation of slaframine was dried over sodium sulfate and used as the source of slaframine. An excess amount of acetic anhydride was added, and the solution was refluxed for ten minutes. The unreacted acetic anhydride was removed by distillation under vacuum. Pure N-acetylslaframine was obtained by sublimation of the residue. N-Acety1-O—deacetyl slaframine was synthesized by heating a solution of N-acetylslaframine in 2 N NaOH in a boiling water 1” Figure 1.--Mass Spectrum of 1—acetoxy-octahydro- indolizine. Mass Spectrum obtained on an LKB 9000 combination Gas Chromatograph mass Spectrometer of 1-acetoxyoctahydroindolizine dissolved in chloroform. The column was packed with 2% OV-l and the column temp- erature was 150°. The ion source temperature was 290°, the filament current was 60 uamps, the electron energy was 70 eV, and the accelerating voltage was 3500 volts. 15 oh“ omH om om OH ON O¢ om om OOH ZFIOHU 16 bath for ten minutes and extracting the product with chloro- form. Deacetylslaframine was prepared by the same method used to prepare N-acetyl—O-deacetyls1aframine. Gas-liquid Chromatography The majority of gas chromatography was done on a Barber Colman Model 5000 Gas Chromatograph. Columns were six feet long and had an inside diameter of 5mm. Column packings used were OV-l and OV-l7 both 3%, pretested, and on a solid support of chromsorb Q (100/120 mesh). Column temperatures used ranged between 150° and 185°. At 185°, slaframine had a retention time of 1.65 minutes. N-Acetylslaframine, N-acetyl— O—deacetylsalframine, and deacetylslaframine had retention times of 9.8 minutes, 6.3 minutes and 1.1 minutes, respectively. Slaframine had a retention time of one minute on an OV—l volumn at a column temperature of 175°. Thin-Layer Chromatography A11 thin—layer chromatography was done on precoated Silica Gel F25“ plates obtained from Brinkmann Instruments, Inc., Westbury, L. 1., N. Y. Samples were applied to the plates in the basic form dissolved in chloroform. A list of the various solvent systems and the observed RF values are shown in Table l. l7 .chozncHz no pcowmom m.mmnoocowmpa ssz oomoHo>oo one: mpoama oonOhohn EchoEEw I < HocmoonQI: I m Hocmnpoe I z EpOMOAOHno I 0 mm. m NH o He. m oH o mm. m 0H b N». H oH o m. H oH oH ma. mm. no. mH. mo.o o N am. mm. m s 0H mm. mm. a m oH mm. om. a m o no. mH. H H ocHEmpmmHm ocHEmnomHm ocHEmpMMHm ocHEmmmmHm Hom 3m .mo>Hpm>HpoQ mpH one ocHEMLMMHm no anamamoumsonno poqu CHQBII.H mqm<9 18 Preparation of Slaframine-3H Acetate Slaframine Free Base A mixture of 310 mg of slaframine dipicrate, four ml 6 N hydrochloric acid and 16 ml water was stirred at room temperature for two hours. The aqueous mixture was extracted with diethyl ether until the ether extracts were cblorless. The pH was adjusted to 10 with 10% sodium hydroxide and the alkaline solution was extracted with three 20 m1 portions of chloroform. The chloroform extracts were combined, dried, and evaporated to yield a residue which was used directly in the next step. N-Carbobenzoxy-Slaframine ‘ A mixture of slaframine free base (from 200 mg of slaframine dipicrate), carbobenzoxy chloride (60 mg), and sodium carbonate (50 mg), in 20 ml water was prepared and stirred at room temperature for three hours. A pH of 9 was maintained by the addition of 2 M sodium carbonate. The aqueous mixture was made acidic with l N hydrochloric acid and then extracted with two 20 ml portions of benzene. The aqueous layer was made basic with 10% sodium hydroxide and extracted with five 20 m1 portions of chloroform. The com- bined, dried chloroform extracts were evaporated to yield 81.6 mg of N-Carbobenzoxyslaframine as a viscous oil. l9 N-Carbobenzoxy-O-Deacetyls1aframine A mixture of 81 mg of N-Carbobenzoxyslaframine and 60 mg potassium carbonate in 10 m1 of methanol was stirred at room temperature for seven hours. The methanol was removed under vacuum and the residue treated with 15 m1 of chloroform. A small amount of sodium sulfate was added to the chloroform solution and the inorganic salts were removed by filtration. The chloroform was evaporated to yield ”6 mg of a white solid, which could be recrystallized from ether to give needles. M.P. 156 - 157°. Acetylation of Carbobenzoxy:O-deacetylslaframine The acetylation process was carried out in vacuo (P<1u) in the laboratory of Dr. R. Neistrom at the University of Illinois. Twenty-nine mg of the alcohol was placed in a break seal vial and connected to the vacuum line. Twenty-five millicuries of tritiated acetic anhydride (specific activity H000 mc/m mole) in a break seal vial was connected to the vacuum line. The tritiated acetic anhydride was transferred to the carbobenzoxy-O-deacetyls1aframine which had been cooled to 77° K with liquid nitrogen. The vial which contained the radioactive acetic anhy- dride was removed and a second container, the contents of which was 20 ul of acetic anhydride and two ul pyridine, was connected to the vacuum line. The contents of this u‘r ‘I'f-‘v -.f . .... . 2O vessel were transferred to the 77° K vial containing the alcohol and tritiated acetic anhydride. This reaction vessel was sealed, removed from the vacuum line, and allowed to react for 24 hours. The break vial was broken and the acetic acid was removed by vacuum using a potassium hydroxide trap. Benzene (one ml) was added and the reaction mixture was 1yophilized to dryness. The residue was dissolved in 10 ml water made alkaline (pH 10) with sodium carbonate and extracted with five 20 ml portions of chloroform. The combined, dried chloroform extracts were evaporated until all chloroform had been removed. Removal of N—Carbobenzoxy group from bL-Carbobenzgxyslaframine . A mixture of N-Carbobenzoxyslaframine and hydrogen taromide in glacial acetic acid were stirred at room temperature fkor one hour. The mixture was poured into ice water and the Eflfl was adjusted to 10 with solid sodium carbonate. The alka- Iline solution was extracted with two 20 m1 portions of cfluloroform. The compound was then converted to the dipicrate Enid recrystallized to constant specific activity before con- ‘verting to the dicitrate for use. The resulting labeled compound had a specific activity of 350 mC/m mole. Thin layer (fluromatography employing two different solvent systems re- Vealed only one peak upon counting 5mm sections which had been scraped from the plate (Figures 2 and'3). The silica -1 ‘1: —-——4—$Ia .‘I . ...‘.I---l -. _ --l . o 21 Figure 2.——TLC of 3H-(acetate)-slaframine. The slaframine was spotted on a TLC plate and developed in a propanol:chloroform:ammonium hydroxide (6:7:0.05) solvent system. The plate was scraped in 5mm sections and counted in a scintillation counter. 22 _. Amoco Eau 23 Figure 3.--TLC of 3H-(acetate)-Slaframine. The slaframine was spotted on a TLC plate and developed in a chloroform: methanol (1:1) solvent system. The plate was scraped in 5mm sections and counted in a scintillation counter. —-—. ‘- - _ u; 211 EU EM... Samba + .12 o —x I A menu t 10¢ 25 gel was suspended in 15 m1 of scintillator containing A1 2 w/w Cab-o-sil in toluene, 9.5% PPO, and 0.03% POPOP and counted in a scintillation counter. Animals All rats used were of the Holtzman strain and purchased from Spartan Research Animals, Inc., Haslett, Michigan. I ’A‘i‘.’ I Animals used as a source of microsomes were male rats weigh- ing 300-“00 grams. Phenobarbital induction was accomplished by including 0.1% phenobarbital in the drinking water; the 1"...4 .- .-._‘~. J pH adjusted to 7 with sodium hydroxide. Animals used to obtain livers for the liver perfusion experiments were 500— 600 g rats of either sex induced with phenobarbital. Blood donors for the liver perfusion experiments were 500-600 grams rats of either sex and blood was taken at two week intervals. Blood was taken by heart puncture after ether anesthesia. Preparation of Microsomes The animals were exsanguished and the livers perfused with 10 ml of ice cold 1.15% KCl via the portal vein. The livers were removed and placed in 1.15% KCl on ice. The tissue was blotted dry with filter paper, weighed, and minced by chopping with a scissors. The minced tissue was homogenized in four volumes of 1.15% KCl with five strokes in a Potter- Elvehjen homogenizer equipped with a motor driven Teflon pestle The homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000 g for 20 minutes and the precipitate containing the nuclear and mitochondrial 26 fractions discarded. The microsomal fraction was isolated as a pellet by centrifuging the 10,000 g supernatant fraction at 105,000 g for 90 minutes in a Spinco Model L ultracentri- fuge. The supernatant fraction was discarded and the . microsomes were resuspended in 0.05 M Tris-H01 buffer (pH 7.5) containing 50% glycerol. In experiments in which the rats were not starved prior to being sacrificed, the microsomal fraction was carefully separated from the glycogen by loosen- ing the pellet in a small volume of buffer with a swirling action. The protein concentration was assayed by the method of Lowry (42). All operations were performed at 0-5°. The microsomes were either used immediately or stored frozen under N at -15°. These microsomes retained their full animopyrine 2 demethylase activity for several weeks providing they were kept anaerobic. Aminopyrine Demethylase Assay CH CH CH | 3 I 3 3 \ / N-CH3 CH3\ /N-H l I microsomes ‘ ./ N N o ’\ / o//\ / + CH 0 N , N 2 NADPH o 27 Reaction mixtures were incubated at 37° under air in a Dubnoff metabolic shaker and contained microsomes (0.7 mg/ml), MgCl2 (7mM), NADPH (0.5mM), Tris-H01 (0.05 M pH 7.5) and Aminopyrine (20mM)a The N-demethylase activity was assayed by measuring the rate at which formaldehyde was produced using the method of Nash (A3). One ml aliquots were removed from the incubation mixtures and diluted into one m1 of 10% trichloroacetic acid (TCA). After allowing time for protein coagulation (about five minutes) two m1 of Nash reagent (2 M NH “02H 30 2, 0.05 M CH3C00H; 0.02 M 2,A-pentanedione) were added and the mixtures were heated at 50° for 10 minutes. The assay mixtures were centrifuged at 1000 g to Sediment the protein and the O.D. of the supernatant fraction was determined at ”12 mp using a Coleman Jr. Spectrophotometer equipped with a flow cell. The -1 -l extinction coefficient used was 7.08 O.D. ml of assay uM of HCHO.‘ Linearity of activity with time (Figure A) and pro- tein (Figure 5) was shown. Hexobarbital Hydroxylation Assay microsomes ,0 O CH3 CH ()5? 3 ‘Pons~.a_c .l.‘_ah -'- ..-.— . . .. 1 28 Figure H.--Activity vs Time for Aminopyrine Demethylase Assay with Rat Liver Microsomes. The metabolizing ability.of the microsomes used in all experiments is shown. The reaction is linear for approximately 15 minutes. See text for incubation conditions. " 29 2...... us: but-.lul.... .HI. .. RAUL. .IIIIILr 30 Figure 5.--Velocity vs Protein Concentration for Aminopyrine Demethylase Assay by Rat Liver Microsomes. See text for incubation conditions. 31 _E \OE H2525 :_E\¢.EU< ".0 0\o 30 4O 20 TIME (min) 10 72 Pharmacological Effects of Activated Slaframine Some unusual pharmacological actions of this metabolite would suggest that this compound is unlike any other cho- linergic compound. Addition of the metabolite, either pro- duced by microsomes and NADPH or FMN and light, caused a rather slow but prolonged contraction (Figure 17,A). The I?“ slow contraction was intermediate between the action of ; acetylcholine and an anticholinesterase such as eserine. Further evidence that the compound was not an anticholines- ‘ terase was obtained by the use of atropine. The addition of L atropine to the organ bath at levels (8.6 pg), double that required for the reversal of eserine effects, failed to reverse the effect of the metabolite (Figure 17,B). These results suggests a very strong binding of the metabblite with the receptor. Further experiments with atropine did confirm the fact that the action of the metabolite was cholinergic. Addition of atropine before the addition of the metabolite to the organ bath completely blocked its action, which is consistent with data obtained in animals when observing salivation in response to slaframine. A gradual but nonetheless significant decrease in sensi- tivity was observed following administration of the active metabolite. No comparable result was observed when only acetylcholine was used to initiate contractions. 73 Figure l7.--The Pharmacological Effects of the Active Metabolite of Slaframine. The active metabolite of slaframine produced by microsomes and NADPH was added to the ileum bath alone (A), prior to atropine (B), and after atropine (C). Upper arrows indicate washings and lower arrows additions. Time markings are five minutes. 7A m2..— .32 ..._U< «a A: «U «n « ~ « t. (m) aswoasaa 75 Biological Activity of Structurally Related Analogues The structure-activity relationship of cholinergic compounds makes the study of compounds which are related structurally to slaframine interesting. In addition it should delineate some of the structure requirements for the unusual activity exhibited by the active metabolite of slaframine. l—hydroxy—octahydroindolizine: The guinea pig ileum did not contract when 1-hydroxy-octahydroindolizine was administered by itself or when in combination with RMN. l-acetoxy-octahdroindolizine: This compound causes a con- traction by the guinea pig ileum whether given in combination with FMN or by itself. The observed contraction did not persist as did the response elicited by the active metabolite of slaframine. After a single wash the ileum relaxes to its resting state as it does following the administration of acetylcholine. 8-amino-octahydroindolizine: Of all the analogues tested, this is the only one which had an observable effect on the live animal. When mice were injected with this amine the animals seemed to be tranquillized. .No effect was observed in the ileum, however, when this compound was given alone or with FMN. N-acetyl- and N—acetyl-O-deacetyl-S1aframine: These analogues caused no response in the guinea pig ileum whether administered by themselves or with FMN. It has previously been shown that 76 deacetylsalframine is inactive in the live animal and thus one would not expect to see activity with analogues without the ester group (A7). EPR Studies of the Metabolite Produced by FMN EPR spectra were recorded at room temperature with a Varian X—band spectrometer equipped with an optical trans- mission cavity. The magnetic field strength was calibrated with a Varian F-8 proton resonance flux meter, the frequency of which was monitored by a Hewlett-Packard frequency counter. The microwave frequency was calibrated with a Silverlab wavemeter. Light of a Zenon Lamp was focused on the sample by a quartz lens. No free radicals were observed in the range where N-oxides absorb even with maximum sensitivity. The sensitivity of the instrument was such that a concentration of 10-7M could be readily detected. bur~m' '25.! " :Au-c...’ ug-...——.~ -1 . a :1 DISCUSSION The data presented in this thesis confirms the indica- tions obtained by Aust 32 a1. (13) that slaframine, which is inactive itself, is bioactivated to a very potent and long lasting parasympathomimetic substance. [Slaframine is acti- vated by liver microsomes, but can also be produced non; enzymatically via a photochemical reaction with flavins. All attempts to isolate a metabolite of slaframine have been unsuccessful. Both TLC and GLC of basic chloroform extracts of blood or urine of animals given slaframine revealed only the presence of slaframine or deacetyl- slaframine, even when radioactive slaframine was used. Livers of slaframine treated animals were also homogenized and ex— tracted with chloroform with similar results, excluding the possibility that much of the metabolite was remaining in the liver. These results indicated that the metabolite might be either unstable or present in very minute quantities, or both. If the amount of metabolite was substantial but unstable, the decomposition product must be slaframine itself, since nearly all of the slaframine given was recovered as the same. The identical Rf values to authentic slaframine in three TLC solvent systems of the recovered material was taken as evi; dence that it was actually slaframine. 77 78 Results from liver perfusions seemed to confirm the results obtained in live animals, i.e. that no metabolite could be detected by the previously mentioned chemical methods. Radioactivity could be nearly completely recovered when 3H-(acetate)-slaframine was used in the perfusion. All the radioactivity in the pH 10 chloroform extract was shown to be slaframine by TLC. A substantial amount of the tritium T was not extractable by chloroform at pH 10, however, and the I amount of counts in the water increased with incubation time. The water fractions Were analyzed to determine if the tritium in the water was a metabolite of slaframine or just the acetate which had been cleaved. All the counts were shown to correspond to acetate which would indicate that hydrolysis was taking place and was time dependent. The possibility that deacetylslaframine was the active metabolite of slaframine was rejected because biological activity could not be demonstrated when deacetylslaframine was injected into live animals.‘ Aust (A7) had previously shown that slaframine is not hydrolyzed by a number of cholinesterases. Therefore the results of this experiment may indicate that slaframine may be altered to a species which is susceptible to hydrolysis by some esterases. Attempts to demonstrate a metabolite of slaframine by TLC after incubation with various liver preparations (slices, crude homogenates and microsomes) were without success. 79 Since attempts to demonstrate the presence of an active metabolite of slaframine by chemical methods were unsuccessful, attention was shifted to the biological evidence for its presence. Aust (13) had previously shown that slaframine acted as a cholinergic drug in live animals. This along with the probability that the concentration of active metabolite was very 13w, made the guinea pig ileum an obvious assay. Microsomal incubations containing slaframine and NADPH caused a sustained contraction of the guinea pig ileum while proper controls (Figure 8) failed to give a similar response. These results were considered conclusive evidence that there is an active metabolite of slaframine and that it is produced by liver microsomes. The transformation could not be prevented by carbon monoxide inhibition even after repeatedly degassing and flushing with N followed by gassing with carbon monoxide. 2 Therefore cytochrome P-A50, commonly involved in the terminal oxidation step in the metabolism of foreign compounds, was shown to be not involved in the activation of slaframine. There was an increase in activity when phenobarbital induced microsomes were used instead of control microsomes. This indicates that some portions of the microsomal drug metabo- lizing system might be responsible, but not the entire system. Another atypical characteristic was that the production of metabolite reached a maximum after approximately five minutes of incubation. This suggested that another cofactor may be 80 required for further increases in the production of the meta- bolite. Another explanation would be that the enzyme concen- tration was limiting, therefore experiments were designed to localize the enzyme system responsible for the bioactivation of slaframine, so that the responsible enzyme could be con- centrated. Results showed that the greatest activity was in the microsomal fraction. A considerable amount of activity was also found in the washed mitochondrial fraction suggest— ing that the reaction may not be carried out solely by the mixed-function oxidases of the microsomal fraction; the usual location for drug transformations. The search for an additional cofactor resulted in the finding that a marked stimulation in activity was observed with added free flavins (Table 3). Stimulation of metabblism of tertiary amines by added free flavins has previously been reported (A8). The lack of a requirement for molecular oxygen and the apparent fast rate constant are also consistent with reports of the transformation of some tertiary amines to N-oxides (A8). However, this stimulation, by flavins, was found to be nonenzymatic, which has not previously been I reported for the transformation of other tertiary amines. The nonenzymatic reaction with flavins is thought to proceed via a free radical since an absolute requirement for light was demonstrated. Photoreduction of free flavins goes via rapid dismutation of the semiquinone to the hydroquinone- level. Since the photoreduction of flavins by tertiary amines has been reported (A9, 50) it is conceivable that 81 either the half-reduced species of flavins, which is a free radical, or the process of producing it, is responsible for the observed reaction. Evidence for the latter mechanism has been obtained by comparison of the reaction rate with riboflavin, FMN, and FAD. McCormick (50) has reported that photoreduction of FMN and riboflavin to the hydroquinone level is approximately four times faster than the photoreduc- tion of FAD. Similarly, the activation of slaframine by riboflavin or FMN was very rapid, however, then FAD was used as the flavin a much slower rate of production is observed (Figure 12). If this free radical mechanism is indeed responsible for the activation of slaframine, slaframine may participate in the photoreduction of the flavin to the half-reduced, free radical species. The oxidized (i.e. minus one electron) slaframine perhaps is the active metabolite. Alternatively, the hydroquinone free radical of FMN, could react with slaframine, or with water to form hydrogen peroxide which could react with slaframine by some mechanism and form the active metabolite which may be the N-oxide of the tertiary amine. Slaframine -flavin (H202 Slaframine ‘ Slaframine (-e-)> (flavin.‘> H2O) CSlaframine N-oxide Hydrogen peroxide and slaframine, after refluxing for ten min- utes gave some activity, indicating that the above mechanism is plausible. 82 The concentration of the active metabolite is unknown, but is estimated to be very low. In experiments with the guinea pig ileum, one p1 of an incubation mixture which is I; 2 x 10' M slaframine is added to the organ chamber which has 8 M final concentration). This con- centration gave a response approximately equal to 2 x 10'8 M volume of 20 ml (1 x 10- acetylcholine. Thus, if slaframine was completely converted to the active metabolite, the active metabolite would appear to be roughly as active as acetylcholine. However, acetyl- choline is readily hydrolyzed by acetylcholinesterase, so its effective concentration is not known but is probably much less than 2 x 10'8 M. Slaframine is insensitive to the action of acetylcholinesterase (A7), so its effective concentration is the actual concentration. If such comparison can be made with acetylcholine, then the concentration of the active ‘ metabolite is even less. In all probability the active meta- bolite is more active than acetylcholine, which makes it perhaps the most potent physiological substance known at the present time. The concentration of the free radical, which, in addition to the problem of stability, could easily be present at concentrations below the limits of detection by EPR. Failure in attempts to increase the amount of metabolite by increasing the irradiation periods suggests that the photodecomposition products may prevent the production of the active metabolite. This also explains why activity cannot be regained in a solution which has lost activity after setting 83 at room temperature in the light, even after additions of fresh slaframine and FMN. The prolonged contraction observed by the guinea pig ileum even after repeated washings suggests that the active compound has a very high affinity for the receptor. Indeed the binding of the active metabolite to the receptor may be irreversible. After the addition of the active metabolite and repeated washings, the ileum rarely completely relaxes and the response to acetylcholine diminishes. If the active metabolite is a free radical and the anionic site of the receptor had at least a partial negative charge the binding could be covalent. Proof that the active metabolite binds to the acetyl- choline receptor was obtained by experiments with atropine. Since atropine will block the effects of the metabolite if given previously, its action must be elicited by means of the acetylcholine receptor. If it was blocking cholinesterase which would allow acetylcholine to act, atropine would reverse its effects if given at the height of contraction. This does not happen (Figure 17), in fact there is no difference between application of atropine to the contracted ileum and washing. Therefore the metabolite must act directly on the receptor. One should recognize the structural similarity between acetylcholine and slaframine: 8A 0 H OTCH3 CH2 0 CH H / 2 000113 N+ g l / \ C“ H3C CH3 L \\b cHé//’ H2 CH3 , The structure-activity relationship is at present only speculative, but the similarity in structure of slaframine and acetylcholine suggest that the active metabolite 18‘ bound in the same manner as acetylcholine. The receptor most likely binds at the ester and tertiary amine positions. It is reasonable that the stronger binding of the metabolite is due to the anionic site rather than the esteratic site. A very plausible explanation of this could be a partial or com- plete covalent bond is formed between the ring nitrogen of the metabolite and the receptor site. 3 A possible explanation of the specificity with which the active metabolite of slaframine acts can be built on the struc- tural properties of slaframine. If the receptors at various glands differ in the spatial arrangement between the estera- tic and anionic sites, only those which have the exact 85 structure to compliment the rigid structure of slaframine would be susceptible to binding by activated slaframine. Since acetylcholine is flexible it can accommodate a wide range of spacial differences between the esteratic and anionic sites. Therefore acetylcholine stimulates all cholinergic receptors while the active form of slaframine stimulates only those receptors which have the correct spatial arrangement for these binding sites. An esthetically pleasing possibility for the bioactiva- tion of slaframine would be to create a positive charge on the tertiary nitrogen. If slaframine gives up an electron from its tertiary amine nitrogen, (to a flavin in the presence of light) the tertiary nitrogen acquires a positive charge. This charge would be stabilized to some extent by the primary amine group in the six position of slaframine. This could give the radical a significant lifetime rather than its probable immediate destruction in the absence of the primary amine. The unpaired electron is subsequently available for sharing with the anionic site of the receptor molecule and could form a partial covalent bond with the receptor. This would explain the extreme persistence of action of the metabolite on the guinea pig ileum despite frequent washings. If this assump- tion is correct, the active metabolite of slaframine could be an extremely useful tool in the isolation of the receptors) for acetylcholine. 86 Failure in the attempts to isolate the active metabolite in the in XlXQ experiments discussed above could easily be explained if the active species was merely slaframine minus an electron. Changes in pH would certainly affect the stab- ility of such a species so it would be destroyed by the pH 10 chloroform extractions. In addition, the radical would be more polar and thus would be less readily extractable by organic solvents. However, these arguments are probably not necessary, for all attempts to show a product of slaframine and FMN by TLC under very mild conditions (no pH change or extraction) were unsuccessful. TLC of the mixture 2A hours after mixing also failed to show any product of slaframine. A very likely candidate for the enzyme responsible for the enzymatic activation of slaframine is NADPH-cytochrome 0 reductase. This FAD containing enzyme has been speculated as being part of the electron transport chain of the mixed- function oxidases of liver microsomes, however, this has not been confirmed. Its candidacy as the enzyme responsible for activation of slaframine is supported by the finding that the reaction requires NADPH which can act as the electron donor to reduce the flavin in the reductase. Confirmation that the enhancement in activity obtained by added free flavins was nonenzymatic came from experiments employing microsomes in the dark. Microsomes themselves continue to produce the metabolite in the dark but no increase in activity is obtained by supplementing the incubation 87 mixtures with riboflavin, FMN, or FAD. This clearly points out that two separate reactions are involved. Both reactions could very well be carried out by flavins. The microsomal reaction, as stated above, could involve the flavoprotein, cytochrome 0 reductase which gets its reducing power from NADPH thus differing from free flavins which abstract an electron from an electron souce, like a tertiary amine, in L the presence of light. I The transient nature of the active metabolite is evidenced by the fact that its activity in the dark decays with a half-life of eight minutes.' The rate of decay of the metabolite is dependent on pH and temperature. Pathways of decay, however, may be different at low pH than at high pH. Slaframine is known to be readily hydrolyzed by basic con- ditions. Hydrolysis of the ester moiety is probably not significant in these experiments, however, since slaframine can still be detected by TLC after exposure to pH 10 or pH 2. It is difficult to understand why the liver carries out any reaction with slaframine. The typical drug metabolizing reactions of the liver make drugs sufficiently polar to be excreted by the kidneys. Slaframine is quite polar and can be excreted readily in the urine as was determined by the live animal experiments. Nearly all of the slaframine could be recovered from the urine. One cannot rule out the possi- bility that slaframine is in its active form when the kidney 88 removes it from the blood and then decomposes to slaframine once it is in the urine. One also cannot eliminate the possibility that the hydrolysis of the active compound may be much more easily accomplished. Thus the actual detoxification of the "toxib" metabolite could occur by hydrolysis while excretion of the "non toxic" slaframine is carried out without alteration. This theory is consistent with results of administration of 3H-(acetate)-slaframine to the perfused liver. The results of this experiment demonstrate the loss of acetate from slaframine with time. Slaframine and deacetylslaframine are also found in the urine of animals given slaframine. The stability of the metabolite, produced by different systems, was not found to differ. Activity was lost when either the microsomal or flavin incubation mixtures were subjected to acidic conditions (pH 2), basic conditions (pH 10) or boiling. This was taken as additional evidence that the metabolites were the same. No difference could be observed in the pharmacological effects of the enzymatically produced and the nonenzymatically produced metabolite. Studies with analogues of slaframine help to delineate the necessary structural properties for activity. For ex- ample, all attempts (as previously mentioned) to demonstrate activity in analogues which lack the O-acetate group have . been unsuccessful. Thus an absolute requirement for the acetate group has been demonstrated. l-acetoxy-octahydro- indolizine showed some biological activity by itself, but 89 could readily be washed off the receptor sites. The observed action may have been a general response of the acetate ester because the concentration was unknown. If the observed re- action of this analogue is specific, it may point out the necessity of the primary amine for the long lasting effect of the metabolite. This would strengthen the arguments for a free radical since the presence of the primary amine would contribute significantly to the stabilization of a free radical. Further evidence for this is shown by the lack of activity when an electron releasing group is attached to the primary amine as with N—acetylslaframine. This function of the primary amine gains interest in view of the fact that both thydroxy-octahydroindolizine and l-acetoxy-octahydro- indolizine have been implicated as precursors of slaframine (10). It is interesting to speculate about the purpose of the enzyme which places the primary amine in the six position of slaframine during its synthesis by R. leguminicola. All attempts to find a free radical by EPR have thus far been unsuccessful, but this does not eliminate the possibility of its presence. The sensitivity of EPR for the detection of free radicals is about 10"7 M. It is en- tirely possible that the concentration of the metabolite is less than this. It may also be necessary to lower the temperature of the solution to see the radical. This would require the use of an organic solvent. The production of metabolite has not yet been investigated in organic solvents. ‘ _-‘.M.'.I 4“ '-_—4 90 One problem with the use of organic solvent is that they may have an adverse effect on the guinea pig ileum, which is at the present time the only assay method known. SUMMARY Slaframine is bioactivated to an active compound which has a stronger affinity for the acetylcholine receptor than either acetylcholine or atropine.i This active metabolite can be produced by liver microsomes and NADPH in zitgg. It can also be produced nonenzymatically by flavins in the presence of light. The production of the active metabolite by the photochemical reaction with flavins results in a much higher (about 200 fold) yield of metabolite than the micro- somal production. The active compound appears to be effective at molar concentrations below the minimum level of acetyl- choline required to elicit a responSe. Isolation attempts have failed thus far because apparently only an extremely small amount of the metabolite is present and it is unstable. Chemical evidence nor the presence of the metabolite of slaframine has not been successful for the same reasons. The only assay at the present time is the guinea pig ileum. The active form of slaframine has a sustained effect on the ileum and cannot be reversed by atropine. The loss of ability of the guinea pig ileum to contract occurs much faster after exposure to the metabolite than when only exposed to 91 92 acetylcholine. This makes the guinea pig assay undesirable and a chemical assay more appealing. Certain structural properties of slaframine have been shown to be important for the observed effect of the meta- bolite. The acetate ester and the ring nitrogen (three carbons away) are necessary for activity. The primary amine group may be important, but conclusive evidence awaits the absolute identity of the active compound. 10. ll. 12. 13. 1A. 15. REFERENCES Aust, S. D., Broquist, H. P. and Rinehart, K. L., Jr. Biotechnology and Bioengineering,lQ,A03 (1968). Byersé J. H. and Broquist, H. P. J. Dairy Sci.,fl§,873 l9 0). Byers, J. H. and Broquist, H. P. J. Dairy Sci.,flfl,ll79 (1961). O'Dell, B. L., Regan, W. O. and Beach, T. S. Univ. of Missouri Research Bu11.,702,(1959). Smalley, E. B., Nichols, R. E., Crump, M. H. and Henning, J. N. Phytopath.,52,753 (1962). Crump, M. H., Smalley, E. B., Henning, J. N. and Nichols, R. E. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.,1u3,996 (1963). Aust, s. D. and Broquist, H. P. Nature,20§,20A (1965). Aust, S. D., Broquist, H. P. and Rinehart, K. L., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc.,§§,2879 (1966). Gardiner, R. A., Rinehart, K. L., Jr., Snyder, J. J. and Broquist, H. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc.,22,5630 (1968). Snydgr, J. J. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Illinois, 19 9. " . Aust, S. D. Biochem. Pharmacol. (in press). Aust, S. D. and Salisbury, G. W. Fed. Proc.,gfl,6Al (1965). Aust, S. D. Biochem. Pharmacol.,l§,929 (1969). Mason, H. 3., North, J. C. and Vanneste, M. Fed. Mason, H. s. Science,l25,1l85 (1957). 93 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 2A. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 9A Strittmater, P. Biological Oxidations,MInterscience Publishers, Wiley (1968). Ernster, L. and Orrenius S. Fed. Proc.,gfl,ll90-9 Wattenberg, L. W., Leong, J. L. and Galbraith, A. R. Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biol. Med.,l27,A67-69 (1968). Alfred, L. J. and Gelbain, H. V. Science,1§2975-76 (1967). Conney, A. H. Pharmacol. Rev.,lg,3l7-66 (1967). Remmer, H. and Merker, H. H. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 125,79-97 (1955). Gram, T. E., Rogers, L. A. and Founts, J. R. J. Pharmacol. Exptl. Therap.,lSZ,A35-A5 (1967). Rubin, A., Tephly, T. R. and Mannering, G. J. Biochem. Pharmacol., 13 1007 (1965) . Rubin, A., Tephly, T. R. and Mannering, G. J. Biochem. Pharmacol., 13, 1053 (196A) . Stizel, R. E., Tephly, T. R. and Mannering, G. J. Mol. Pharmacol.,fl,15-l9 (1968). McMahon, R. E., Mills, J., Culp, H. W., Gibson, W. R., Miller, W. M. and Marshall, F. J. J. of Med. Chem., g, 207 (1969). Tephly, T. R. and Mannering, G. J. Mol. Pharmacol.,fl, lO-lA (1968). , Cooper, D. Y., Levin, S., Narasimhula S., Rosenthal, O. and Estabrook, R. W. Science,lAZ,A00 (1965). Klingenberg, M. ‘Arch. Biochem.,15,376 (1958). Garfinkel, D. Arch. Biochem.,11,A93 (1958). Omura, T. and Sato, R. J. Biol. Chem.,232,2370 (196A). Omura, T., Sato, R., Cooper, D. Y., Rosenthal, O. and Estabrook, R. W. Fed. Proc.,gfl,ll8l (1965). Omura, T., Sanders, E., Estabrook, R. W., Cooper, D. Y. and6gosenthal, 0. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.,ll7,660 (19 ). All; 'E‘AI-Jaof . 3A. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. A0. A1. A2. A3. AA. A5. A6. A7. A8. A9. 50. 95 Remmer, H., Schenkman, J., Estabrook, R. W., Sasame, H., Gillette, J., Narasimhulu, 8., Cooper, D. Y. and Rosenthal, 0. Mol. Pharmacol.,2,187 (1966). Sladek, N. E. and Mannering, G. J. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.,gfl,668 (1966). Christianson, R. Mon. J. Med., Condon, 29,193 (1855). Fraser, T. R. Edin. Med. J.,2,36 (1863). Argyll—Robertson, D. Edin. Med. J.,§,815 (1863). Stedman, E. Biochem. J.,gg,719 (1926). Wilson, I. B., Hatch, M. A. and Ginsburg, S. J. Biol. Chem.,235,2312 (1960). Stowe, C. M. Veterinary Pharmacology. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L. and Randall, R. S. J. Biol. Chem.,l93,265 (1951). Nash, T. Biochem. J.,§§,Al6 (1953). Brodie, B. B. and Cooper, J. R. J. Pharmacol. Expt'l Therap.,llA,A09 (1955). ' Somogyi, M. J. Biol. Chem.,§§,655 (1930). Van Harken, D. R., Tephly, T. R. and Mannering, G. J. J. Pharmacol. Expt'l Therap.,lA2,36 (1965). Aust, S. D. Ph.D. Thesis, U. of Ill. 1965. Pettit, F. H. and Ziegler, D. M. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm.,l_3,193 (1963). Merkel, J. R. and Nickerson, W. J. Biochem. Biophys. Actau,lfl,303 (195A). McCormick, D. B. Flavins and Flavoproteins, University Park Press (1968). IHIIIHIHHIW||||H 3177 5582 l l Ill l l Ill l l "I 31 'IIHIAIH