'llHl" I l Mlhllllhllxl I | ‘ I” I“ l l 129 986 THS ' ' A EUR‘JET {I}? THE (IQR’E‘LEW’WE‘ :3H‘1‘SECAE. EDUCATWM pfiACTtCfiS’. B»: 'KL‘QE S-éCCRéiDJ‘RY S»C!'!Odooom humpm you can nouns eaoonom near eaoonom near oaoonom noonoaeom capoaane< eaoonom Habaw HE... 2H czHadeoHamflm mqoomom hgzoomm mo mHmuSz baa 17 TABLE VI COMPARISON OF THE PRESENT PROG2 US WITH THOSE OF THE YEAR 1946 Present Programs in Programs in Corrective Corrective Physical Physical Education in Education in Michigan Michigan in 1946* School No. For No. Per Class Cent Cent A 23 36.5 6 in.3 B 3% 25.4 13 19.2 c u7 ' 23.8 8 9.8 D 30 31.6 3 ”.6 E“ 2 16.7 Total 136 27.1 30 8.M *Includes total programs both boys and girls in the secondary schools of Michigan. This study, however, had a return of only N4 percent. *‘This survey did not include the class E schools. Table VI has indicated a comparison of the present corrective physical education provisions in existence in the secondary schools of Michigan today with those of 19146.3 It would appear from.these data that there is a definite trend toward.more corrective practices. Table VII shows the total number of boys in the secondary schools is each classification responding to the questionnaire and the total number identified by the questionnaire as being atypical or physically 2R. B. Daubert, "A Survey on Conditions of Physical Education and Health Education Programs for Secondary Schools in Michigan" (Lansing: Michigan Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation, unpublished Committee Report, 1946), p. 5. 31bid. 18 handicapped. It also indicates the percentages according to the school classifications. TABLE VII TOTAL NUMBER OF ATYPICAL BOYS IDENTIFIED Total Number of Total Number of Boys Attending Atypical Boys Schools responding Reported in Schools to Questionnaires responding to Questionnaire Rec— ognized as being Atypical School Number Schools Number Schools Number Per Class of Schools no Answer No Answer Cent A 77 11 45,088 43 392 0.9 B 190 8 31,066 49 507 1.6 c 256 20 20,740 89 311 1.5 D 185 6 6,096 6 121 2.0 E 20 2 236 5 2 0.9 Total 728 47 103,224 172 1,333 1.3 Throughout this chapter mention is made to the questionnaire, letter of transmittal and the follow-up letter which can be found in the Appendix. The questions were tabulated according to school classification. Separate tabulation charts were used for the five classes of secondary schools. In the first section under General Information all percentages were figured on the 501 schools that responded to the original ques- tionnaire. Under the other four main headings; Organization and 19 Administration, Program, Facilities and Equipment and Instructional Staff, tabulations were made for the total number of responses on the particular question at hand. Most of those schools which replied on the last three sections were from the 136 schools which stated they had some type of corrective physical education provisions. I. INFORMATION REGARDING ORGANIZATION AND ADHINISTRATION. The questionnaire (see Appendix) was grouped into four main.head— ings: Organization and Administration, Program, Facilities and Equipa ment, and Instruction Staff. This section has been confined to the heading of Organization and.Administration. An effort has been made to determine the effect, if any, school enrollment has upon this phase of the study. 22mp§§_q£_schools with_corrective_p_ sical_education provisions. Table VIII has been constructed to show the class of schools offering the various types of corrective physical education activities. The types listed were: Specially scheduled corrective physical education classes, Adapted activities in regular physical education classes, Adapted activities suggested outside of regular school hours, Super. vised rest programs, No program provided and.others. Eight (1.6%) of the 501 schools which returned the questionnaire conducted special scheduled classes in their physical education program. Eighty—eight (17.8%) of the 501 schools that replied had adapted activities in their regular physical education classes. Thirty-five (7.0%) of the secondary schools stated activities were suggested for 20 .aoawdeoam no can» one can» once uoxoomo uuoomou harms. .oaadaqodamosv on» on wsdcnoauoa racemes yo mama npnauqoo canoes m.mm mam o.H m o.~ mm m.~a mm m.H w How Hosea 0.0m an 0.0 o 0.0 o ~.oa m 0.0 O me a :.an an H.a a m.m m m.wa ma H.m m mm a w.am mom m.o H H.a 1H ~.ma Hm m.o H Noe o m.am Na m.a m o.n m m.aa mm ~.o a nma m as: an a; a no a mam. 1: no a mo 4 psoo ammo psoo ammo pcoo uaoomom mmeao mom .oz mom .oz mom .oz aom .oz pom .02 Mo Hoomom nopssz mafiom emmmmao noca>oam Swamoam Hoomcm Headmom mo cofipmosvm are“ uommdao nowpmodam sapwoam umom ooampdo copmommsm leash asdawmm qH Headmasm o>fipoonaoo oz eooaeaoanm acaaaeaco< eocane< speeches eocanea eoaneonom adaoaooam smwom mom wonmeomm onB mBHB onomow wmdflHOomm mo mmmfibz HHH> MAM4B 21 the boy to do outside of regular school hours. Five (1.0%) had super- vised rest programs. There were 278 (55.5%) that checked they had no program provided and 14 schools (2.8%) stipulated other provisions whiCh they had for caring for their atypical boys. 2222222 presented for_n0t offering corrective physical gduggpigp, The reasons why corrective physical education provisions were not of- fered has been shown in Table IX. In many instances schools stated more than one reason. The reason stated most often was the lack of facilities and equipnent. 0f the 501 responses, 245 schools (48.9%) checked facilities and equipment as being the reason. There were 224 schools (44.7%) that stated there were insufficient number of boys to justify a program. There were 192 (38.3%) that stated.they had no time available in their school schedule. Physical education staff schedule, too full now, was checked by 22.0 percent of the schools. Sixteen percent of the secondary schools stated the physical education staff were not adequately trained. There were 8.4 percent that didn't feel that corrective physical education was a responsibility of the school system. Eighteen other reasons were listed. There were 68 schools that failed to answer any of the reasons on their reply. Data 9p.schools_with some form 9; corrective physical education. All data subsequently discussed in this chapter will pertain to those schools which stated they had some form of corrective physical education provisions for atypical boys. 22 .mnompo use .pmHmsaogp Hmothdn an confinemeam one: mowaa>wpoo «as more woanH one: economy menace obauooaaoo .uaooaom Heaoomm as mommsao condoned m2on asoam2p4 0.mH we :.0 0: ~.:: :mm 0.0: 0:0 m.wm mmH 0.0H 0m 0.0m 0HH Hones 0.0 0 m.w H m.wm a a.H: a 0.00 n ~.0H m 0.0 H a 0.0m 0H m.m m 0.:0 H0 w.om H0 m.m: H: m.mH 0H m.0H 0H n 2.:H mm H.: w ~.~: :0 2.0: 00 H.0m aa m.mH 00 0.0 0H 0 2.0 m 2.0 MH m.~m 0m 0.0m N0 w.mm w: m.~H :m H.mm a: m m.~H HH w.mm mH 0.0H NH 0.0: mm 0.0m mm m.:H m 0.0: pm 4 acre peso psoo were 0:00 pace ammo mmsHo pom .02 mom .02 com .02 arm .02 arm .02 mom .02 Hum .02 Hoomom haH nHHpHuqumom . doggone :02 Hoonem 902 asamopm ascendsUH easuonom , haopmsvd< Hash 00a soapmosbfi s aprmsh 09 0:4 Hoomow aH p02 macaw oasfionom HnoHoshm aaom co noneaz eoHaHHHoom .HchHneq. nochonem aoHaoocem moaned o2 oproohaoo pcoHowmmdmsH opmdvodssH 0829 02 asoamhgm Hson2nm ZoHadoDnH .quHmE Eggs E2220 2.02 on mqoomOm Mfienoomm E mzoma NH Hands 23 Table X has shown four general questions asked on the question- naire (See Appendix, questions 4, 5, 6, and 7 under Organization and Administration). These questions were mainly intended for those schools which stated they had some form of corrective physical educa- tion provisions. Other schools in selected cases elected to state what they were doing. In compiling the data all schools that answered were tabulated. Question four: "Are medical examinations required of male students annually?" Of the 254 schools, which answered the above question, 115 (45.3%) stated medical examinations were required and 139 (54.7%) stated no medical examinations were required by their school systems. Numerous schools stated medical examinations were required only for boys partic- ipating in athletics. Question five: "Is the instructor of corrective physical educa~ tion present at the school medical examinations?" Eighty schools responded to the above question on the questionnaire. The instructors were present in 26 (32.5%) of the schools. They were usually present in 12 (15.0%) of the schools. Eight (10.0%) rarely were present and 34 (42.5%) never were present at the school medical examination. Question six: "How many periods per week do the boys have cor- rective physical education classes?" Of the 42 responding to the above question the average number of classes per week were 1.9. Class E schools were the only schools that did not respond to this question. It was stated previously in this 2h m.0: 0.H :m w mH 0m mMH mHH Hence 0 0.0 m 0 0 0 m m 2 mm m.m : 0 m 0 NH H: 0 a: H.m : m : a n: :m 0 w: m.m a H m 0 mm mm m eopnan Hm H.m NH m 0 : :m Hm 4 umsHo ao>02 haoamm madman: amends 02 no» Hoomom uofiaom «moonwao wmsHo qupsosbm Hooa aaoapscHsoxfi HsoHcoz one norm neagm oprooHHoo no no oaomoam soapcosem phaaddch mo M002 Hem meowaom Hmowmhgm o>Hpoonaoo upsoddpm odd: mo coaasvom saws omcaobd no 89982 emanated mo aoaoshpmcm om» mH uncapmqfiamxm decade: and N mqmda onademHannd 924 onaammsm adsoprOdem .sosoo ..o .2 .pmaasaomp Hsofimhmm one: dopmwa mammpOse .vcommoa pom was aaoozom m mmmaos m m m H H semuompo m m m m a £355 N H o H omadz S H o o m 89.89 $282 ma N o z m soapsoscm Hmofimhgm mo noma>aomsm : o H o m 51333 Balsam .8 goatsmafi an m :a ma m nomwbammsm oz .02 .oz .02 .62 .oz honosapmcH soapsosca asefinanm mummpo n masao o nasao m amsao .4 mmsao o>apooaaoo mo muooaphegaw [11" '1' Fl“, Ivl mmoeobmamzH onadoDnfi AdonMmm mbHBommmoo mo onmH>mHmDm >N mqm4a 34 f. principal g. others. The number one response was the physical education instructor had no supervision. The second most responded to was the supervisor of physical education, and third listed was the medical Doctor. Table XVI shows the interest that the instructional staff has in attending courses, if offered, in instruction of corrective and adapted physical education and prevention and rehabilitation of the most com- mon types of athletic injuries. Table XVI seems to indicate a need for such a program in our higher institutions, and if the desire is there it is logical to assume that it is the duty of the larger in- stitutions to provide for such needs. TABLE XVI STAFF MEMBERS INTERESTED IN FURTHER TRAINING IN CORRECTIVE PHYSICAL EDUCATION - fi ———- v — v- School Class Yes No No Answer 1 19 8 36 B 33 6 95 c 36 9 152 n 27 s 60 E 3 1 3 Total ' " ' 118 32 w 357 m On the question, "Are one or more members of the staff designated as the corrective physical education teadher?" Ten schools (8.1%) of 35 the 123 schools responding, stated they designated one or more members of their physical education staff as corrective physical education teachers. One hundred thirteen schools (91.9%) did not designate any member of the physical education staff as the corrective teacher. As school enrollment increased, a larger percentage of the schools designated staff members as corrective physical education instructors. "Who teaches the boys‘ corrective physical education classes?" was the question which resulted in the formulation of Table XVII. Only 7 schools had women teach boys' corrective physical education classes, 43 schools stated that men taught their corrective physical education classes and only one school stated they had both. TABLE XVII TEACHERS OF BOYS' CORRECTIVE PHYSICAL EDUCATION CLASSES _ — ~_ ‘ ‘— School Total Responses Men Teachers WOmen Teachers Both Class 1 13 8 4 1 B 9 9 0 o c 16 11+ 2 o D 13 12 1 o 1::- o o o 0 Total 51 43 7 _. 1 *No responses. It seems to indicate that the larger the school system the more elaborate the program in corrective physical education. The Class E 36 schools are limited to only adapted activities within their physical education classes. The larger the school the more people assigned to the physical education staff. zany of the small schools reported not even having a physical education prOgram. . A desire for further training in corrective and.adapted physical education and prevention and rehabilitation of athletic injuries by physical education instructors was reflected in Table XVI. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the higher institutions to provide facilities for training. Through this and similar studies possibly this need will be more adequately met. CHAPTER V SUMHARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMHENDATIOHS A. Summary A questionnaire was formulated to study the extent of the corb rective physical education practices in the secondary schools of Michigan. The primary source of data for this study was the information re. ceived from 501 secondary schools of Michigan out of the 728 schools which were sent questionnaires, (a return of 68.8%). The questionp naire was grouped for study, according to class, under four general headings: Organization anthdministration; Program; Facilities and Equipment; and Instructional Staff. The data were then tabulated.and tabled and comparisons were made between the schools in terms of school enrollment. The response on the original questionnaire was 43 percent. Six weeks later a followbup letter, along with another questionnaire, was sent to the schools which had not responded to the original question- naire. In the final results 23 schools (36.5%) in class A stated they offered corrective physical education for their atypical boys, 34 schools (25.4%) in class B, 46 schools (23.4%) in class C, 30 schools (31.6%) in class D stated they had corrective physical education pro- visions, and 2 (16.7w) of the 12 schools in class E. B. Conclusions The conclusions drawn from this study are limited in their scope. It is requested the conclusions be utilized within their limitations. 1- Relatively little has been done in providing provisions for corrective physical education in the secondary schools of Michigan (136 of 501 schools stated they had some type of program). The main reason given for not offering a program was inadequate facilities and equipment. 2- There were fewer recognized atypical children found in the present study. The findings of this survey of the 103,224 students, only 1,333 (1.3%) were designated as being atypical. This is contrary to G-ross'1 findings of 9.0 percent and to the 7:1 ratio discussed in Chapter II. Either the schools are recognizing only the very severe cases as being atypical, or the instructors are not sufficiently train- ed to recognize the atypical students. 3- The tendency, in general, seems to be the larger the schools system the more corrective physical education provisions provided. The main reason given in the class C, D and E schools for not provid- ing a program.for their atypical was insufficient number of boys to justify a program. Also a few class C, D and.E schools don't even offer physical education programs in their school systems. 4. There seems to be a trend toward.more corrective physical education provisions. Comparison of this data with earlier studies - 1ElmerA. Cross, "A Survey of the Present Practices in Corrective Physical Education for Boys in the Public Secondary Schools of Penn— sylvania," (ED. D Dissertation, The University of Pittsburgh, Pitts— burgh: 1952): P0 3’40 39 seem to verify this trend. 5- Few special areas are available for corrective physical edu- cation classes (25 rooms in the 501 schools responding). 6— There is an apparent need for further training, for physical education staff members, in corrective physical education practices. 7— The corrective physical education programs now in existence in the secondary schools of Michigan do not seem adequate enough to meet the increasing need of the atypical student. Only 136 (27.2%) of the 501 schools responding stated they had some provisions for cor- rectives. Eight stated they had specially scheduled classes, 88 had adapted activities in their regular physical education classes, 35 schools stated that adapted activities were suggested outside of regular school hours, 5 had supervised rest programs and 14 listed other provisions. There were no programs in 278 schools. C. Recommendations 1- There is a need for further study of the corrective physical education programs, in the elementary and secondary schools, to deter- mine what can be done, to determine what constitutes a good program in corrective physical education at these levels. 2- A State Organization of Corrective Physical Education Instruc- tors could be set up to arouse interest, and to set up policies on administration and organization of such programs. 3— An investigation is needed of the possibility of State aid in providing for the necessary equipment desired to make a corrective physical education programs possible. Since inadequate facilities and equipment was the reason given for not providing a corrective physical education program by the secondary schools of Michigan. 4— It is recommended the functioning corrective pregrams be evaluated as to their adequacy. APPEQ'D IX MICHIGAN STATE COLLEGE 1+2 snsr LANSING DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND RECREATION March 2, 1955 Dear Director of Physical Education: I am conducting a study of the present practices in corrective physical education for atypical‘bqys in the public secondary schools of Michigan. Neither you.nor your school ‘will be identified in the study. The answers you submit will not affect the rating of your school in any way. The questionnaire has been constructed so as to make the task in answering as easy as possible. If your school does not conduct corrective physical education exercises or activities of any kind for boys, please fill in the General Information blanks and check the proper answers for only questions one through four under Organization and Administration and ques- tions one and five under Instructional Staff. It is only through information such as I am requesting that the present status of corrective physical education in Michigan can be determined. I hope you will be willing to aid your profession by taking time to answer the enclosed question- naire. You will find a stamped, self-addressed envelope enclosed. Thank you for the help and cooperation. An early reply would be deeply appreciated. Sincerely'yours, M/a/ai 'wo e D, van Hues, Assistant Professor, Physical Education WDVHzed Enc. 9““ Co I.“ 1*: («‘6‘ s '7‘ m :t 'w u mil". 1 ' 3 [firm I Britannia! ~n IS row as THE uvmc . . . to a: DEDICATED Hth’ to m: unnmsuro wonx . . . . El '1' '1 1555-1955 LINCOLN MICHIGAN STATE COLLEGE 43 EAST LANSING DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION HEALTH AND RECREATION FOR MEN JINISON GYMNASIUH AND FIELD HOUSE May 19, 1955 Dear Sir: Two months ago I sent you a copy of the attached questionnaire, with a stamped self-addressed envelope. We are trying to determine the extent of corrective practices in the secondary schools of Michigan. In tabulating the results we find we have less than a 50% return and that we have no return from your school. For the questionnaire to have desirable validity, the returns should be above 80%. Your school is not rated in any way as a result of this questionnaire. Any help you can give us would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely yours, . / ' / I / I 4", (A: 41.54% z/L. {by e. ’ 1'“ v -~ wayné/D. Van Hues Assistant Professor WDVH:jp "H! ":1 IS row as THE LIVING . . . to IE DEDICATED HERE ro rm: UNFINISHED won: . . . . LINCOLN l. 2. 3. h. A STUDY OF THE PRESENT PRACTICES IN CORRECTIVE PHYSICAL EDUCATION FOR ATYPICAL BOYS IN THE PUBLIC SCHOODS OF,MICHIGAN I. General Informatigg_ Name of School Class.A B C D E (Circle one) Person filling out questionnaire Position Total number of boys in grades 9-12 (Please replv to all questions with (X) unless otherwise stated). 1. 2. 3. he 5. 6. 7. II. Organization and Administration Total number of atypical or handicapped boys in your school identified through medical examinations or other acceptable diagnoses. (write number) Check below the type of corrective physical education provisions for boys that most clearly fits your program. a. Specially scheduled corrective physical education classes b. Adapted activities in regular physical education classes 0. Ada;)ted activities suggested for atypical boys to do outside of regular scnool hours d. Supervised rest program e. No program provided (Excused from.all P.E. classes) f. Other provisions (Please list) (If there are No corrective physical education provisions for boys in your school, please- answer only the following question and return this question- naire in the enclosed self-addressed envelope). Reason no program of corrective physical education has been provided: a. Physical education staff schedule too full new b. Physical education staff not adequately trained c. No time available in the school schedule d. Inadequate facilities and equipment 6. Insufficient number of boys to Justify a program f. Do not believe corrective physical education is the responsibility of the school g. Other reasons (Please list) Are medical examinations required of male students annually? Yes No Is the instructor of corrective physical education present at the school medical examination? Always ; Usually' ; Rarely Never . .0 How many periods per week do the boys have corrective physical education classes? (write number) 'What is the average length of the corrective physical education class period? (write number in minutes) . 115 III. Prggram 2. 1. Are any conferences held with the atypical student before any activity is suggested? Yes No 2. What type of cumulative records are kept in corrective physical education? a. None f. Activity participation b. Personal history 3. Test results c. Medical examination results h. Absences d. Doctor's recommendations 1. Recent illnesses or injuries e. Prescribed exercises j. Achievement records heck one or more) IV. Facilities 32g,§gui2ment . Where)are the corrective physical education classes conducted? (Please state l-' N o How many special rooms are available for corrective physical education classes? None *3 One ; Two 3 Three 3 Four ; Others (Write numbers)“ to . ‘What are the approximate dimensions of these special rooms? (write approximate feet) h. Where are the school medical examinations given? (Please list) __ 5. What equipment is available for corrective physical education classes? Stall bars and stools Shoulder wheel vertical rope """"Hor1 zontal bars ”‘Rowim; machine Mats Parallel bars Foot inversion tread Marbles Sidehorse wands Mirrors Rings Dumbbells Cots Horizontal ladders Medicine balls ‘Wrist roller Spring exercisers Indian clubs Infra-red lamps “Pulley'weights Light punching bags Goniometer “Bar bells Jumping ropes Iron boots Stationary bicycle lamps Finger ladder Ankle disk ha aequipment (Please list) ‘ 3 V. Instructional Staff |_l . How many men are on the physical education staff? Are one or more members of the staff designated as the corrective physical education teachers? Yes No [0 O . Who teadhes the boys' corrective physical education classes? Man -, Woman ;Both _. b.) LI. 5. 1+6 3. 'Who supervises the boys' corrective physical education teachers in your school system? a. No supervision b. Supervisor of Health Education 0. Supervisor of Physical Education d. Hedical Doctor e. Nurse f. Principal g. Others 'Would any members of the staff'be interested in attending courses offering instruction in corrective and adapted.physical education and the prevention and rehabilitation of the most common athletic injuries if such courses were offered? Please return questionnaire to: W} D. Van Hues Asst. Prof. Physical Education Michigan State College East lensing, Michigan BIBLIOGRAPHY Books Daniels, Arthur S. Adapted Physical Education. New York: Harper and Brothers Publishers, 1954. Good, Carter V. Dictionary_g£_Education. New York: McGrawaHill Book Company, Inc., 19h5. Ksssler, Henry H. Rehabilitation g£_the Physically_Handicapped. New York: Columbia University Press, 1937. Nixon, Eugene W. and Cozens, Frederick W. An Introduction tg_Physical Education. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company, 19M7. Stafford, George T. Sports for the Handicapped. New York: Prentice- Hall, Inc., 1939. Staley, S. C. The Curriculum ig'Spgrts. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company, 1935. Stone, Eleanor B., and Dayton, John W. Corrective Therapy for the Handicapped_Child. New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1951. Periodicals Irwin, L. W., and Reaves, W. C. "Adapted Activities In the Secondary Schools," Research Quarterly, Vbl., 11 (October, 1940), p. 103. Stone, E. B. "Physically Handicapped Children in Our Schools,” Journal g£_Health and Physical Education, Vol., 13 (February, 19H7): ' 67' Trepp, J. P. "Present Trends in Correctives," Journal g£_Health and Physical Education, Vol., 8 (December, 1947), p. 635. Publications of the Government, Learned Societies, and Other Organizations Michigan Department of Health, Provisional_Figures gg.Live_Births. Lansing: Department of Health, 1955. Michigan Department of Public Instruction, Nichigan High SghooI_Athn letig_Association Bulletin. Lansing: November, 1954. 1«‘9 National Education Association, Personnel and Relationship__in School Health, Physical Education apg Recreation. Research Division, Research Bulletin Vol. 28. No. 3; October, 1950. Office of Education, Biennial Survey of Education in the United States, Statistics of Special Schools and Classes for Exceptional Children. Washington: —Government Printing Office, “1950. United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census, Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1953. Hashington: Government Printing Office, 1§§h. Unpublished Materials Capretta, John P. “An Adapted Program of Physical Education for the Third Street School for Crippled Children, Columbus, Ohio.” Un- published Master's thesis, Ohio State University, 1933. Daubert, R. B. "A Survey on Conditions of Physical Education and Health Education Programs for Secondary Schools in Michigan" Un published Committee Report, Michigan Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation, l9h6. Dierke, James. "A Study of the Need for a Remedial Physical Educa- tion Program for Boys in the Junior and Senior High Schools of San Fransisco.” Unpublished Master's thesis, Stanford University, 1936. Gross, Elmer A. "A Study of the Present Practices in Corrective Physical Education for Boys in the Public Secondary Schools of Pennsylvania." Ed. D Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, 1952. Hickes, Roy M. "An Evaluation of the Discretionary Administration Practices in the Interscholastic Athletic Program of the Member Schools of the Pennsylvania Interscholastic Athletic Association." Unpublished Ed. D. Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, 1951. McCollom, Francis B. "”easurement of Progress in Corrective Physical Education.” Unpublished master's thesis, University of Southern California, 1932. yetcalf, Harlan G. "The Establishment in the Public Schools of Educa- tional Procedures for Children with Physical Defects." 2 Vols. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, New York University. 193“. Morehouse, William H. "A Survey of Health and Corrective Physical Education in the Los Angeles City Schools." Unpublished Master‘s thesis, University of Southern California, 1936. 5O Pederson, Edward.J. "A Descriptive and Experimental Study of the Individual Physical Education Program in the Township Schools of Wakefield, Michigan." Unpublished master's Thesis, State Univer- sity of Iowa, 1939. Redpath, Clyde A. "The Status of Physically Handicapped Children in the Junior High Schools of the First and Second Class Cities of Kansas." Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Kansas, 1938. Stafford, George T. "Adapted Sports for Atypical Boys in Secondary Schools." Unpublished Ed. D. dissertation, New York University, 1937- Taylor, Warren S. "A Survey of the Corrective Physical Education Program in the Elementary, Junior High, and Senior High Sdhools of Los Angeles." Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Southern California, 193“. Thomas, Granville E. "Corrective Physical Education in the State of California." Unpublished Master's Thesis, University of California, 1930. Whipple, Clarence H. "Remedial Treatment for Physical Defects of Denver High School Boys." Unpublished Master's thesis, Univer. sity of Denver, 1931. , Young, Carl H. "A Procedure in the Organizing of a Corrective Physi- cal Education Program for High School Boys." Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Southern California, 1935. ‘ Younger, Maximillian W. "Factors Governing the Effectiveness of the Remedial WOrk in the Physical Education Program in Junior and. Senior High schools in Cities over 100,000 Population in the Unified States." Unpublished.Master's thesis, Temple University, 193 . Date Due Demco-293 MICHIIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRAR 2093 IIE I. I