E METAZOAN FAUNA A SURVEY STUDY OF TH 05 MUD LAKE; OF THE PSAMMOL‘TTORAL ZONE BARRY COUNTY. MlCHlGAN Thesis he fl» 599m af Hi. 5. MWHBSAN STATE UNNEESQTY Peter G‘ Weber 3963 THESIS a W *1 erv-v L [B R A R Y 3 Mkiu'gzm State . .— Unlucky ABSTRACT A SURVEY STUDY OF THE METAZOAN FAUNA OF THE PSAMMOLITTORAL ZONE OF MUD LAKE, BARRY COUNTY, MICHIGAN by Peter G. Weber Core samples were collected from the psammolittoral zone of Mud Lake (T. 2 N., R. 9 w., S. 8, Barry County, Michigan) from October 1961 to the end of August 1962 with the purpose of investigating the abundance and distri- bution of psammolittoral organisms and their variance throughout a season. Particular attention was focused on the distribution of organisms--both vertical and horizontal—— within the psammon. Wherever possible correlations between distributional patterns and physico chemical factors were made. The following physico chemical measurements were taken: sand temperature, pH oxygen concentration, carbon dioxide concentration, beach slope, and position of the "black layer." Since the characteristics of these were found to vary approximately in the same manner as found in previous studies, an extensive discussion was not undertaken, 'but a listing of these characters for the Mud Lake psammon is included. Peter G. Weber The composition of the Mud Lake flora and fauna was approximately the same as that reported by Pennak (1940) and Neel (1948) in their studies. A notable difference between this and the two previously mentioned studies was in the relatively meager rotifer fauna found in Mud Lake. Cladocera, Malacostraca, and Acari were major taxons of the Mud Lake sand which previously had not been reported from the psammon. Other minor faunal differences were discussed as well. The seasonal and spatial (vertical and horizontal) distribution of the major taxons found in the sand was dis- cussed and compared with that found by previous investigators. A SURVEY STUDY OF THE METAZOAN FAUNA OF THE PSAMMOLITTORAL ZONE OF MUD LAKE, BARRY COUNTY, MICHIGAN BY Peter G. Weber A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Zoology 1963 (‘g :2 7 £0 r/ -/ - .1 If": ,r / w] "i!" ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my indebtedness to those who helped with and gave suggestions to me during the course of this project: Dr. T. W. Porter for his advice, criticism, and encouragement; Dr. M. M. Hensley and Dr. J. E. Smith for reading and criticizing the dissertation; Dr. H. C. Yeatman for his work on the identification of the harpacticoid copepods; Dr. R. P. Higgins for his identification of the tardigrada; Mr. C. S. Scarborough for varification of the mites. Also my gratitude is extended to Mrs. B. Henderson for her aid in procuring materials necessary for this study. 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1V LIST OF FIGURES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . v LIST OF PLATES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii Chapter I. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . 1 II. DESCRIPTION OF AREA STUDIED . . . . . . . 2 III. PROCEDURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 IV. PHYSICAL CHARACTERS OF THE PSAMMON. . 7 Beach Slope . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Organic Debris . . . . . . . . . . 7 Temperature . . . . . . . . 2O Hydrogen Ion Concentration . . . . . . 22 Carbon Dioxide Content. . . . . . . . 22 Oxygen Content . . . 22 Other Physico Chemical Characters Of the Psammon . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 V. BIOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE PSAMMON . . . . . 32 General Features. . . . . . . . . 32 Faunal and Floral Lists . . . . . . . 39 Protozoan Distribution. . . . . . . . 48 Nematoda Distribution . . . . . . . . 57 Rotifera Distribution . . . . . . . . 6O Tardigrada Distribution . . . . . . . 63 Oligochaeta Distribution . . . . . . . 65 Copepoda Distribution . . . . . . . . 73 Cladocera and Malacostraca . . . . . . 81 Larval Insect Distribution . . . . . . 82 Acari Distribution . . . . . . . . . 85 Other Metazoans . . . . . . . . . . 92 VI. SUMMARY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 SELECTED REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 iii Table IO. 11. 12. 13. 14. LIST OF TABLES SlOpes of the three transects Location of black layer; given (in cm.) as (tOp figure in box) and bottom figure depth from tOp cm. bottom limit of the layer ( in box) Distribution of six groups of organisms in relation to the black layer (black line) for-- a. November 12, 1961 (T1) b. October 28, 1961 éT3; c. October 22, 1961 Air, water, and sand temperatures taken with a T2 Weston thermometer. pH of lake and capillary water taken with a Beckman l8O pocket meter. Chemical features of the Mud Lake capillary water: 02, C02, and Alkalinity . Distribution of testacious rhiZOpods. Distribution Distribution Distribution Distribution Distribution Distribution Distribution of of of of of of of Nematodes Rotifers. Oligochaetes tardigrades. copepods. immature insects mites. iv Page 12 14 16 18 21 23 30 49 58 61 64 66 75 83 86 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Average height above water line on the three transects, as determined from the slopes taken with a Brenton compass . . . . . . 9 2. Horizontal variation in To ,T°s taken at depth of 2. 5 cm. . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 3. Horizontal variation in T08 ; T0S taken at depth of 8.0 cm. . . . . . . . . . . . 26 4. Horizontal variation in To ;T°S taken at depth of 12.0 cm. . . . . . . . . . . . 28 5. Seasonal distribution of Algae, Testacia, Rotifera, and Nematoda . . . . . . . . 35 6. Seasonal distribution of Copepods, oligochaetes, insects, mites, and Cladocera. . . . . 37 7. Distribution of Algae (solid line) and fauna (protozoa, Rotifera, and Nematoda; broken line) on Transect 1. Total numbers of organisms of the tOp 5 cm. . . . . . . 42 8. Distribution of Algae (solid line) and fauna (protozoa, Rotifera, and Nematoda; broken line) on Transect 2. Total numbers of organisms of the tOp 5 cm. . . . . . . 44 9. Distribution of Algae (solid line) and fauna (protozoa, Rotifera, and Nematoda; broken line) on Transect 3. Total numbers of organisms of the tOp 5 cm. . . . . . . 46 10. Horizontal distribution of testacious rhiZOpods in the top 5 cm. of sand . . . . . . . 53 11. Vertical distribution of testacious rhiZOpods_ . 55 12. Horizontal distribution of Oligochaeta in the top 5 cm. of sand. . . . . . . 69 Figure 13. 14. 15. l6. 17. Vertical distribution of testacious rhiZOpods. Horizontal distribution of harpacticoid COpepods in the top 5 cm. of sand. Vertical distribution of harpacticoid copepods Horizontal distribution of mites in the tOp 5 cm. of sand . . . . . . . . . . Vertical distribution of mites. vi Page 71 77 79 88 89 LIST OF PLATES Plate Page 1. Transect 1 on the eastern shore of Mud Lake . 11 2. Transect 2 on the southern shore of Mud Lake. 11 3. Transect 3 on the northern shore of Mud Lake. 11 vii I. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study was to gain some insight onto the kinds, numbers, and distribution of psammon organisms and their variance throughout a season. Admittedly studies of this sort have previously been undertaken and therefore part of the initial purpose of the study was to acquaint the author with the psammolittoral environment and its organisms. The psammolittoral region is one which investigators have found to contain quite varied and extensive communities of both plants and animals. Pennak (1940) concluded in his study that "Perhaps no other environment is capable of supporting such a dense and diversified group of microorganisms as the sandy beach." This is also an environment which, compared to other regions of the lake, has received relatively little attention. Neel (1948) gave a brief review and an extensive bibliography of the work done to 1948 and Pennak (1940) also gave a good summary in his study. Except for Myer's work, all of the fresh water psammolittoral studies in this country have been undertaken in Wisconsin and Michigan. The most recent work, by Neel (1948), stressed the physico chemical aspects of the psammon in contrast to the emphasis upon psammo organisms in previous studies. The present study is concerned more with the biota of the psammon than with its non-biological features. II. DESCRIPTION OF AREA STUDIED‘ No previous study, limnological or otherwise, has ever been undertaken on Mud Lake; consequently nothing is known of either its biological or physico chemical character- istics. The lake was selected for study primarily because of its relative isolation. It is also one of the few lakes in this particular area of Michigan with a natural sandy beach relatively undisturbed by human inhabitants. The psammolittoral region has been divided by several workers into zones or sub-regions. Wiszniewski (in Neel, 1948) considered the psammolittoral to extend lakeward for an indefinite distance and landward to a few meters above the water—line; he divided this region into three general areas: 1) hydrOpsammon: the Shoal portion of the sammon (i. e. the submerged sand . 2) hygrOpsammon: the consistently moist region 0—1 meters above the water-line. 3) eupsammon : the most landward portion of the psammon from 1—2 meters landward. Though there are other ways of dividing the psammon, the zonation of Wiszniewski is used throughout this paper since it conveniently includes the entire psammolittoral zone; other classifications being restricted to only the beach portions. Coarse sand, gravel, and an abundance of surface vegetation characterized the Mud Lake psammon. According to residents of the region the lake has been receding in 2 the past few years; the shoreward portion of the psammon has thus been increasing in size and the shallows decreasing. The width of the psammon varied but on the average was eight meters. Collections were only taken from the lakeward five meters of this region. Three transects were arbitrarily selected, one on the western shore (Tl), one on the southern (T2), and one on the northern (T3) (see plates 1-3). Collections were made alternately from each of the three transects throughout one year. All three transects were overlaid by surface organic debris expecially in the hydrOpsammon, as well as by a considerable growth of surface Vegetation (mostly Scirpus .gp. and Carex Sp.). The beach of both T1 and T2 was composed of rather coarse sand grains and pebbles. The slopes of the three beaches also differed (see Table 1). On T1, the fine surface sand continued two meters shoreward from the water-line and there was replaced by coarse gravel and sand which extended landward for another four and one half meters. Surface plants were found mostly in the gravel region. T2 was distinguished by sand and gravel throughout the entire beach region. The psammolittoral zone was considered to extend shoreward six meters from the water's edge and into the water to where the layer of organic deposition replaced the sand. The water-line was used as a reference point and designated as 0, stations landward of the water-line were designated as plus (+), and those shoalward as minus (-). III. PROCEDURE The methods employed for collecting and extracting organisms were similar to those suggested in Limnological Methods (Welch, 1948). Aluminum tubes of two-inch internal diameter were inserted into the sand at 500m. intervals along a transect on the beach. The tubes were inserted by hand pressure to as great a depth as possible, which, in most cases, was to about 15 cm. Immediately the tubes with their sand core samples were stored upright in a portable icebox and transported to the laboratory for processing. Samples were refrigerated until processed. Collections were made alternately from three different transects. In order to get an estimate of seasonal variation in the fauna, collections were made at monthly intervals except September and those months when snow and frozen ground impeded field work. Collections on a given transect were made within 50 cm. of each other so that subsequent samples were taken from the same region. The process of extracting the organisms from the sand was that suggested by Welch (1948) and also used by Neel (1948) in his study. A plunger was inserted into the lower end of the aluminum tube, the sand core pushed out and divided into one cc. sections from which the organisms were extracted. The one cc. sand core was then placed into an evaporating dish and one cc. of a saturated solution of menthol added as a U7 a relaxing agent. The sample was allowed to soak in the menthol for five minutes after which 15 cc. of tap water was added. A fine capillary stream of air was bubbled into the evaporating dish bouncing the sand grains around and separating out the organisms from the sand; this procedure lasted two minutes. The water was then slowly decanted and centrifuged for one minute and the super-natant again poured back into the sample in the evaporating dish. The entire procedure was repeated in the same manner three times per one cc. sand sample. The material obtained from a one cc. section of sand was then preserved in 16 cc. screwcap vials in a solution of 40% glycerin in 4% formalin. Other preservatives such as 4% formalin and FAA were tried but the glycerin mixture was the best for taxonomic purposes. Analyzation, counting and identification, of the contents of the one cc. sand sample was done by shaking the 16 cc. vial to homogenize the concentrate thoroughly, extracting one cc. with a drOpper and placing this in a Sedwick-Rafter counting cell. The average from ten counts was used to determine the number of organisms per cc. of sand. In this manner an attempt was made to obtain an estimate of vertical and horizontal as well as seasonal distribution. Due to the impracticability of such a large number of samples it was not possible to make a second series of ten counts which would have given greater accuracy to the pOpulation estimates. Because certain of the organisms (copepods, oligochaetes, cladocerans, insects, and mites) were not present in sufficient numbers to appear in the ten counts made with the Whipple micrometer two different kinds of tabulations were made: 1) An estimate was taken with a Whipple micrometer of the organisms present in sufficient number to appear consistently in counts (these included Testacea, algae, rotifers, nematodes, and tardigrades). The average of ten counts from a one cc. Sedwick- Rafter counting cell was taken and the number of organisms per cc. of sand determined from this. 2) A second tally of the number of organisms per cc. was taken by counting the total number of a particular organism in the one cc. Sedwick-Rafter counting cell; the number of organisms per CC. of sand were determined from this. Since the two counts were not equivalent there were no comparisons made between them but they were instead treated separately in the discussion. IV. PHYSICAL CHARACTERS OF THE PSAMMON Beach Slope Measurements of lepe were made at 50 cm. intervals along a transect with a Brunton compass. The importance of the degree of slope in limiting the horizontal distribution of psammo organisms was pointed out be Pennak (1940). In general, the greater the slope the smaller the width of the beach inhabited by psammo organisms. Greater SlOpeS do not permit the movement of capillary water up the beach and in these beaches there is a reduced quantity of capillary water in the surface sand nearer the lake. Slope then, is a primary factor in determining the distribution of capillary water which, in turn, limits the distribution of psammolittoral organisms. Figure 1 shows the differences in the slopes of the three transects. Organic Debris At depths of between 3-5 cm. below the surface there was a stratum of organ material, the black layer (Table 2). This layer, 4-6 cm. in thickness, extended vertically to a maximum depth of 10-14 cm. below the surface. Occasionally a sample would not Show a distinct black layer. Conversely, a few samples contained a considerable amount of organic material throughout most of their depth. TABLE l.——SIOpes of the three transects at Mud Lake Distance from Average Height IIEGEeEeESIe (iilgggrees) Ab?i: Water-line T1 T2 T3 Tl T2 T3 O (water—line) O 4 3 0.5 5 5 3 4.4 4.4 2.6 1-0 7 4 4 6.1 3.5 3.5 1.5 8 6 5 7.0 5.3 4.4 2.0 8 8 4 7.0 7.0 3.5 2.5 7 O 4 6.1 0.0 3.5 3.0 6 3 5 3 2.6 3.5 7 3 6.1 2.6 4.0 6 l 5.3 0.9 4.5 2 1.7 5.0 2 1.7 5 5 5 4.4 Figure 1. Average height above water-line on the three transects. AS determined from the lepeS taken with a Brunton compass. a a. a a 0 if u e- 1.1839 Mint]. height shin Into-Jim (in a.) v: '1' 50 IO HM! 0.....0 ban-Oct: Q”... Mascot) I I I I I , I ...1.. I I I I I i . . A . no 150 zoo 8’0 300 350 A60 . 55b 560 556 W manta-u cap (in u.) a; - --- ‘ - . Plate 1. Transect ’el; _ -‘*.S ,‘_,- ‘ ' p l on the eastern IT‘jgji;—-- -_U- ,-. ’ shore of Mud ‘ "“ '* "5‘ ‘ ' Lake. . I .o 'v 1' u . _:;" H;- ’f‘\t . Plate 2. Tran- sect 2 on the southern shore of Mud Lake; note the great amount of sur- face organic matter in hygrOpsammon. ‘(g-VI‘- )L;' 111'; ' f2?;":“ .. ' Plate 3. Transect 3 on northern shore of Mud Lake; note pro- fuse surface vegetation. raw" "-‘ue‘f' Sm. .~ " fl? 0‘“, {I I. -2* ,3; J. ’3". ‘.' 13" :II' p n- "‘ z: ;, Iv... . - o .. . ##1##?" 2; seesaw Haw H I . ‘. A ‘ . .. v- 12 TABLE 2.--Location of the black layer given as depth (in cm.) from the surface of sand; bottom figure in the box is bottom limit of the black layer. Poorly developed layer. Blank cells indicate absence of the black layer.¥ Distance From Water's Edge (in meters) {-2 3 (+3 1 Date and transect 2 1.5 1 .5 O .5 1 1.5 -2--2.5 3 3.5 ‘2 Nov. 18, 1961 1. a 3 4 4 3.5 5 ' 5 3 ~ 4 7 11 10 6 11 8 7 9 Oct. 22, 1961 2. 3 6 * -)(- * 9 * * * 9 Oct. 28, 1961 3. 5 9 5 8 4 4 3 5 lo 14 9 12 10 8 7 10 Nov. 12, 1961 1. 4 4 4 4 3 4 8 4 11 8 12 13 9 5 14 * * 10 Dec. 3, 1961 2. 4 3 - 4 3 3 * * 12 8 x 6 * 9 9 *Asterisks indicate presence of black layer but no distinct upper or lower limits. 13 According to Neel (1948) and others, ". . . the black layer is due to the reduction of iron oxides by sulfides pro— duced by anaerobic decomposition of organic material," and that ". . . color changes associated with penetration of oxygen into black sand indicate that the upper limit of the black layer marks the division between anaerobic and aerobic zones in the sand." Very few organisms occurred below 2—3 cm., and, apparently the black layer may be a major limiting factor in restricting the vertical occurrence of the psam- mobiota. Table 3 graphically demonstrates the distribution of some of the psammoorganisms in relation to the black layer on the three transects at a particular time. In every instance, except the oligochaetes which are highly motile, there were no organisms found below this layer. Certain other factors, aside from the black 1ayer,such as the amount of oxygen and light, the latter of which particularily restricts the algal flora to a depth of 2-3 cm. , were factors limiting the vertical distribution. Since in transects where the black layer was poorly develOped organisms did not occur to depths greater than in the transects with a well develOped stratum, the exact importance of the black layer was impossible to evaluate in comparison to other factors (e. g. amount of light, water, etc.) in restricting the depth to which psammo organisms occur. 14 m w s o as m suosnoomHHo a. m mH mm 6H m o 0 6H so mm omH mm H m m s w m w: : mpoaonoo mm mH mm m: m mm am m 6H mm mH ms mm H m w s m m noeH: 6H m mH o 6H 6 o o 6 ms as H s 1m.m m m.m m m.H H m. o m. H m.H m AEoV .H ~+Hl Anv spoon HmmH,.mH .>oz Amhoumfi :Hv owom m.Hmum3 Eonm mocwpmfin poomcmha i cam mean / .Hmev .HmmH .NH sopso>oz Hoe HosHH Eamov AmhmH xoman 0:» on :oHpmHOH cH mEchmmHo mo mnsohw me mo EOHuanaumHQnu.mm mqm02 33 m.c H.n H.s H.s m.s HE .HcmH 2 “H .>cz m.o 0.0 o.s o.s 0.» me .HcmH .sH .wse m m.H H, m. o m. 2m. A-V on comments H+p HIV dong mm ome 02m coma AmepoE :HV mmcm m_Hop63 Eopm oocmpmHo AmQHoHooos m Ho ommpo>mv .80 3 mo comma m pm memB mm Hmpmz HHmHHHmwo .HouoE ma poxooo cmH cmEXOOm w csz Coxmp Hops: kaHHHQmo ccm owa co mo::.m MHmm onpvhuHcHwaH< ocmwmcc .mc ”Hoods mHeHHHQmo owa o5: ecu mo moHSHmom HmoHEwncun.m mqmoz mm Henopoc 38 1111 [111111] ‘1] auuooeaHo mm neaHsimw daooncHMWW qegsnxnzuo Hears a: 3.8835 essences M H.eonenooc aoHooHaosnnau mu HSoSoSHHoc 321a I Es me Erato .u «n ma Hononoo m HoeH own .63 .080 8 «> put 9 JO oo /8WBTUBBJD Jo Jeqwnu .cco .ONHH rcmNH.. . 6.3 TOOQH .cch .cme Axxxw 39 Faunal and Floral Lists Floral Lists I. ChlorOphyta O: Chlorococcales Pediastrum Sp. Sorastrum sp. Quadrigula sp. Scenedesmus sp. Zygnematales Mougeota Sp. Netrium Sp. Closterium Sp. Cylindrocystis Sp. Tetmemorus sp. Staurastrum Sp. Euastrum Sp. Micrasterias Sp. Cosmarium sp. Spirogyra Sp. Micricystls Sp. Zygnema Sp. Gomphosphera Sp. Synecocooccus sp. II. EuglenOphyta O: Euglenales Euglena sp. III. Chrysophyta IV. CyanOphyta O: Faunal Lists Chroococcales Merismepedium Sp. Gloeocystis sp. Oscillatoriales Oscillatoria sp. Lyngbya Sp. I. Protozoa O: Testacealobosa Arcella vulgaris Ehrenberg A. discoides Ehrenberg Centropyxis aculeata (Ehr.) Stein 40 C. constricta (Ehr.) Penard C. arcelloides Penard C. ecornis (Ehr.) Leidy Difflugia urceolata Carter D. lebes Penard D. corona Wallich D. lobostoma Leidy D. oblonga Ehrenberg Hyalosphenia elegans Leidy Qualdrulella Sp. Nebela Sp. Cyphoderia Sp. Euglypha cristata Leidy Euglypha Sp. II. Turbellaria III. Nematoda IV. Gastrotricha V. Rotifera O: Bdelloida Philodinidae O: Ploima Keratella cochlearis Kellocottia sp. Trichocerca sp. Colurella Sp. Lecane muoronata Lecane sp. Monostyla sp. VI. Tardigrada O: Eutardigrada Macrobiotus dispar Murray Hypsibius granulifer (Thulin) Marcus VII. Annelida O: PlesiOpora Aeblosoma sp. Stylaria Sp. Chaetogaster Sp. Pristina osborni (Walton) P. breviseta (Bourne) VIII. ArthrOpoda O: Cladocera O: Malacostraca Hyalella azteca (Saussure) 41 Copepoda Pastenocaris brevipes Kessler P. delameri Chappius Elaphoidella bidens coronata (Sars) . Insecta O: Collembola Pondura aquatica (L.) Diptera F: Tentapedidae F: Delicapodidae F: Chaeronomidae Acari Oribatidae 42 Figure 7. Horizontal distribution of algae (solid line) and the combined pOpulations of Protozoa, Rotifera, Nematoda, and Tardigrada, in transect 1. Total numbers of organisms in the tOp six cc. lmnboroforganimintwoinomofoand 530,000 600,000 570,000 540,000 420,000 390,000 360,000 330.000 300,000 270,000 240,000 210,000 180,000 150,000 120,000 90,000 60,000 30,000 15,000 x4++ n A I 43 )—-— 1001’. 18.1961 .— —0N0v 12,1961 —--®Jun625, 1962 lI----lNov 12,1961 ”DOOt 18,1961 [bx-EJ131925, 1962 i... T 1.5 %.<)J 0.5 0 0.5 1(0) 15 20 2.5 3.0 3.5 40 Distance from water' a edge (in M) 44 Figure 8. Horizontal distribution of algae (solid line) and the combined pOpulations of Protozoa, Rotifera, Nematoda, and Tardigrada in transect 2. Total numbers of organisms in the t0p six cc. Hmflnu-ofcngpnhmusiniup Ehreo.¢flfa&md 142,500 4 135.000 4 'i ‘ T n J 1 o b-Dfl'30ct 22' 1961 27'50 ‘ o—--—onec 3, 1961 «"h—“Jul 27, 1962 120,000 4 !---lJu1 27, 1962 LIN-"[1001? 22, 1961 lv—X-IJDeo 3, 1961 112,500 ‘ 105,000 97.500 ‘ 90,000 . 32,500 75,000 - 67.500 60,000 52.500 . 45,000 37. 500 30,000 « 22,500 '2 15,000 7.500 3.750 s n 6.5 120 115,210 2.5 5.0 5.5 Lo ‘0 Distance from water's edge (in M) 46 Figure 9. Horizontal distribution of algae (solid line) and the combined pOpulations of Protozoa, Rotifera, Nematoda, and Tardigrada in transect 3. Total numbers of organisms in the tOp Six cc. Number of organisms in top 311 cc. of sand 47 ./ (+) o—--o Oct. 28,1961 1 ---- Hay' 1,1962 I - ~-l0ct. 28,1961 \ .. /_-' ’1 - _TI-;|-/“ cf 015 1.0 125 210 23 3:0 3.5 #10 Distance from water's edge (in II) 48' Protozoan Distribution. Because of the fact that all protozoans except the testaceous rhiZOpods were too fragile to survive the particu— lar treatment used for extracting psammon organisms, the following discussion includes only the latter. However, in the preliminary observations of ”live" sand samples, a considerable protozoan fauna was noticed, eSpecially of the Ciliata (e. g. Hypotricha and Holotricha) and MastigOphora groups. Previous studies, for the reason given here, also have included only a discussion of the Testacea; a thorough ecological study of psammon protozoa is thus needed although a major problem of extracting these organisms exists. The genus CentrOpyxus sp. was, by and large, the most abundant of the Testacea in the Mud Lake psammon. Considerable pOpulations of both Arcella sp. and Difflugia Sp. were also present in some collections. Centropyxis aculeata (Ehrenberg) Stein was the common species of this genus; though_g; constricta (Ehr.) Penard was also present in some numbers. Euglypha sp., Hyalosphenia sp., Quadrulella sp., Cyphoderia sp., and Nebela sp. were other genera of Testacea which occurred in small numbers in the sand. Horizontal distribution: As seen from Fig. 9 the great- est concentration of Testacea was in the landward portions of the beach between (+) 0.5 and 2.5 m. This roughly concurred with Pennak's (1940) findings. In contrast to the horizontal 49 H .H * oomH m mmmH * oozo m .H HHpo< oomm * oomm oomm H oooH H H oow: * oooH * m HomH oozo ooHo oozo oomm oom: * m .mH .>oz oooo oooo ooom oom: oozo oozo * * * H * NH HH oH o 1.. m s o * m oozo * oooH H .H oom: oommH oooH oooH oooH m HomH oomo oomom oozo oooH * * oomm m .mH .poo ooooH ooom oooH ooom oooo oooH oooH H m;w m m.N N m.H H m. 0 m. H m.H N A.EOV Pcmmfimfip H1O A-v spoon one oomo 69$me 93. ompm m Loom: 509m o.oca-p.mHm l‘ __. mdonNHoE. .msooomumu u0.moHu5 mHgomHmn-.H mqmoz * * * * H H .H * * * * * * * m HmmH * * * * oooH * m .mH .ooo * * * * * H m.m m.m m m.H H m. o m. H m.H m A.Eov pommcmpp H+c H-c spoon one moon Amhopoe :Hv owom m.moumz Eomm ooCmpmHQ coHpoonpmHo moopoeoz--.m mqmda: m * m .m * * * H mmmH * ocmH * * m «H hm: * * * * * * * m * comm ccwH * ocmH * * * * H * * m * * m .m * . * * * * H HmmH * oooH * * * m .mm .ooo * * * comH * m oowH ccmH * * * * H o * m * H .m * * * m mcmH * * * * * * m «mm thh * * ocmH * * * comm * * H * o * m .m occH * H HcoH * * * * m “m .owm * * * * * m * ccmH * * * H H m m m m m m m H H m o m H m H m A.Eov poomcmmu H+M H-c spoon one oooo Ampopoe :HV omom m_pmuo3 Eopm mocmpmHm AcoSQHpcoovnu.c mHmoz * * H comH * * m .H occH m HcmH * oooH * oomH. oooH H .mH .poo H m.m m m.N N m.H H m. m. H m.H N A.Eov vommcmhp H+c Hip; spoon one memo Amhopoe :Hv owcm m.moum3 Eonm oocmpmHm .soHpanepmHo meoHHeom--.m mHmHB 62 H .m m mmmH * * m ..H hm: H ccmH @ m * H .H m meH * * * m «mm .poc * * * H m m H .m ccmH m mmmH * m «Nm hHSb * * ccwH * ccmH * H H .m m HcmH * 2 m .m .ooo * comm * H m.m m.m m m.H H m. o m. m.H m A.Eov poomcmhp hHV Auv Samoa ocm sumo Amhopoa :HV mwom n.90pm3 Song mocmpmHQ HooHoHocoov--. m mHmHB 63 psammobiotic (rotifers found only in the-sand), psammOphile (rotifers of the sand which also occur in the vegetation of the littoral zone), and psammoxene (rotifers character- istic of the plankton and which are accidental to the sand and unable to persist there for any length of time) ecological groups. Horizontally, rotifers of the ploimate group were found from 2.5 m. landward to 1.5 m. into the water with the majority occuring in the hygrOpsammon region; vertically individuals were found to a depth of 4 cm. though most inhabited the t0p 2 cm. of sand. Psammoxene genera such as Keratella Sp. and Kellicottia Sp. appeared in one or two of the samples. Seasonally, rotifers were never abundant. Higher pOpulations were present in the October 18 and July collections than in any of the other samples. Rotifers were low or absent from November, April, and May collections. Wiszniewski (in Pennak, 1940) reported maxima in June and September and absence of rotifers from November to April in Poland; Pennak (1940) agrees with this. Not enough counts, however, were made to determine, in a similar way, the characteristic seasonal variance of the Mud Lake Rotifera. Tardigrada Distribution Two Species of Tardigrada inhabited the Mud Lake sand: Macrobiotus dispar Murray and Hypsibius granulifer (Thulin) Marcus. Tardigrades were found in each of the three transects 64 H .m m HooH m .wm .ooo * * H H .m * m HmmH * * * m «M .omm * ccHHH * comm H o m H .m * * m HmmH * * * m «mm .poc * * * H c m H .H m HcoH * m .mH .>oz * comm * * H m.m m m.m m m.H H m. o m. H m.H m A.Eov poomcwhp A+V HIV Samoa one ome Ampopoe CHV owom m_mopm3 Eomm mocmpch .GOHpSDHmpmHU mommecmeun.H:qumHB 65 studied, but their appearance, at least as adults, was limited to the months of October, November, and December. If this represents pOpulation maxima, the present findings differ,somewhat, from the end of May to the end of June peak that Pennak (1940) found in his sand samples. Pennak (1940) discussed distribution, general ecology, and seasonal variation of tardigrades in some detail in his Wisconsin investigation. His findings with regard to the ecology of this group in the sand are the most comprehensive thus far. Both Neel (1948) and Pennak (1940) found great instability in the tardigrade population; Pennak (1940) in fact, states that ". . . populations of Tardigrada on any beach are almost unpredictable and that they may vary greatly over a period of time." In the Mud Lake sand tardigrade occurrence, both horizontal and vertical, was also sporadic though there was a distinctly greater number found in the landward portion of the psammon (see Table 10). Vertically this group was not found below 3 centimeters. Oligochaeta Distribution Very little is known of the oligochaete fauna of the sand, either of the kinds which typically inhabit the psammon, of the seasonal abundance, or of the environmental factors influencing its distribution as well as the nature of the distribution along the psammon. 66 m oH om m H .H oH oH pH oH m mooH oH mm m .mm page oH oH mm oH o o oH H m 0H m H H .H mH mH wH m HmmH oH mm oH m .mH .>oz o oH Ho mm ooH mm H mH NH Hm HH oH m m S m m oH H HomH mm oH mm m .mH .eoo mH Hm mH mH mH m ow 0H om mH Hm H m.m m m.m m m.H H m. o m. H m.H H.Eov poomqmmu H+c H-c spoon one open AmmopoE :HV owom m.poum3 Eopm mommpmHm .soHospHnenHo oooesoowHHo--.HH mHmHB 67 o m 0H oH H .m mH m momH mH m .H as: o o o o o mHH H oH o oH oH m .m mH mm H HomH oH oH oH mm oH m .mm .Hoo oH wH mm Hm 0H m wH mm mm om mH mm H H .m m mooH m .sm sHso o o o o o o o 0H 0H o H oH oH oH o Ho m oH oH mm H .m mH oH mH oH m HomH mm oH oH mm mm m .m .ooo oH oH om wH H m m 5 pH o oH oH m oH oH oH mH H .m oH mm oH mm oH m HomH mm mH mm mH wH mH m .mm .ooo mH oH mHH mH ow oH Ho ow H H m.m m m.m m m.H H m. o m. H m.H m H.26V possess» spoon one open H+H H-c Hmmmpoe :HV owom 9.8.83 5099 005335 1 l‘) Hooschcoov--.HH mHmHB 68 Oligochaetes of four genera were present in the Mud Lake-- sand: Pristina sp., Chaetogaster Sp., Aelosoma Sp., and Stylaria sp.; the latter two were found only in the pre- liminary investigation when "live" sand samples were inSpected. Of the two genera found in the study, ChaetOgaSter~Sp.- was consistently the more abundant in the sand. Horizontal distribution: Oligochaetes were dis— tributed in nearly the same numbers lakeward as they were landward in contrast to the Copepoda and Testacea which were distinctly more abundant in the beach region as compared to the shoals. This observation agreed with that of Neel (1948). Nor did this group show a distinct preference for a particular portion of the sand in their horizontal distribution but instead were relatively evenly distributed. Therefore, in contrast to the c0pepod distribution, which was characterized by a peak concentration in a particular portion of the beach, oligochaetes often exibited several maxima along a transect (Fig. 11). Vertical distribution: Here again there was a marked difference between the dis- tribution of oligochaetes and harpacticoid copepods. Whereas the c0pepods had an Optimal pOpulation at 2 cm. below the surface, oligochaetes were most abundant in the t0p centimeter of sand (Fig. 12), rapidly decreasing in numbers in the deeper layers; the t0p 3 cm. contained the greatest numbers of oligochaetes. The greatest depth to which oligochaetes were found was 12 centimeters below the surface. Figure 12. Horizontal distribution of Oligochaeta in the t0p five cc. of sand. 7O i 540 ( 510 l ..__. Oct 18, 1961 n J o-‘--o Nov 12, 1951 T1 I-x-l Jun 25, 1962 T1 480 . o—-—o Oct 22, 1961 '12 ‘ hu—c Jul 27, 1962 T2 L‘F-""'a D90 3. 1961 T2 450 , ammo Oct 28, 1961 T3 ‘ ‘bX x-o May 1, 1962 T3 420 390 4 J U l g 330 4 U) Q4 4 C>300 1 a . O ,4 270 . (D Q J 9240 J U) H 4 8 {30210 . p O %;180 l 2 $4 1 5" a) _0- O .0150 / : °. 5 : ‘ Z l ' . 120 :' \ ‘5. 90 . 5. f‘k. °' fl 5 0 3 '7‘ , . ,x‘ .f 60 -. 1’ “\ if ° \ \ . " ‘ i Q!” . “ . I’o/Ko“ ‘ \ 3o . A ' )4: v; ‘. , .33 15 ( A<::-ikk. ~+ ‘ #$g’ *" 5 \IF- 4;_. #r— *\Q:——H¢—:-- 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 ('3’? m) 1.5 1.0 0.5 o 0.5 1.0 1.5 (-) (+) Distance from water's edge Figure 13. 71 Vertical distribution of Oligochaeta. of sand Number of organisms per cc. ‘ 5.3 72 510 l 480 450 420 it. 390 A 3 C Li:;54 /. U ‘o‘ a””. 3 8' <3 <3 fiHH 2 210 J 5“ \ 180 4 | Q . 2 60 15 3—--O Ir—x-ql (ya—3 Ab—u-JL a—---¢1 g...u3 9—AX-G ertical distance (in cm.) Oct Nov Oct Jul Dec Oct May 1961 1961 1962 1961 1962 1961 1961 1962 T2 (T2 T2 T3 T3 73 Seasonal distribution: In comparison to the Spring and summer collections (April-July) all of the fall and winter samples (October l8—December 3) contained high—numbers of oligochaetes; the October 22 collections possessed the greatest numbers of individuals. COpepoda Distribution The characteristic c0pepod of the fresh-water beaches, with one exception belongs to the suborder Harpacticoida, a group peculiarily adapted for its existence in the sand intersticies. The three Species found in the Mud Lake investigation were Elaphoidella bidens coronata (Sars), Pastenocaris brevipes Kessler, and Pastenocaris delamari Chappius. Neither Canthocampus Sp.nor Phyllognathus sp. the only other genera often found in inland beaches, occurred in the Mud Lake psammon. According to Yeatman (recent correSpondance), Pastenocaris starretti Pennak described from a Wisconsin lake by Pennak (1939) is identical with P. brevipes of EurOpe, and, that which Pennak listed as P. brevipes in the same report is actually P. delameri. When these misidentifications were considered, c0pepod fauna was identical with that Pennak had found in his study except for the absence of E. b. coronata from Wisconsin and PhyllognathOpuS paludosus Mrazek from Mud Lake. In this study the nauplius larval stage was excluded from the population estimates, the figures given pertaining only to the adult individuals. 74 Horizontal distribution: Since it was not possible to break down the distribution of the three species, if indeed there was a difference in their vertical or horizontal inhabitation of the beach, the distribution of copepods will be discussed in terms of the harpacticoid group as a whole. Harpacticoids occurred from (+) 3.5 m. landward to (-) l m. lakeward with by far the greater numbers inhabiting the (—) 5.2 m. region of the beach (see Fig. 13). This concurs with previous findings of Pennak (1940) and Neel (1948). Undoubtedly harpacticoids inhabited the sand both farther landward and lakeward but obviously conditions for their existence were Optimal from .5—2 m. from the water's edge where, as mentioned by Pennak (1940), the sand is neither saturated nor too dry, as well as removed from the greater portion of wave action. Of the Specimens which had been identified, E. b. coronata was taken from the O, (+) l, and (+) 1.5 m. stations, P. delamari from (+) 1.5-2 m., and P. brevipes from (—) 1.5 to (+) 2 m. Whether these species inhabit Specific portions of the beach is not known. According to Neel (1948) Pastenocaris sp. in the Douglas Lake psammon, inhabited only the beach portion. Vertical distribution: Vertically the most striking feature was that in virtually every transect harpacticoids exibited a distinct peak two cm. below the surface (Fig. 14). Apparently the amount of water above the two cm. depth was not sufficient for Optimal COpepod existence there. 75 oH oH oH o oo oH m oH mmH mH oH oH oH H .m oH wH mmH wH oH m HooH Ho om osH om ow .Ho om m .mm .eoo mm oH oH mm mm H o om m H .H m momH m .mm been o o o oH oH o H H .H wH mm mH m HooH mm oH mm Hm m .m .>oz o oH mm oH wH mm H oH m H o m .H mmH oH Ho H HooH oH ooH om mH m .wH .ooo oH ooH Ho oH mm m oH oH o H m.m m m.m m m.H H m. o m. H m.H H soc someones spoon one some H+c Hmpopoe :Hv omom n.90um3 Eopm mocmpmHQ .eoHesoHsonHo ooooooo oHooHeoeonem--.mH mHmHe 76 o H m oH oH wH H .m oH oH mH Ho oH m mmmH oo. Ho HHH 3 23 a H see oH om Ho oeH mew oH mom oSH H mHH w mm s oH o mm m .m mH oH H HooH oH wH Ho om mH m .mm .ooo mm mm om HHH new oH m o oH Ho mm mm Ho H H .m m momH mm oH m .sm HHso o oH o o oH oH o o H mm o oH oH Ho m oH oH oH H .m oH Ho oH mH m HooH mm Ho mom oH m .m .ooo oH o mm oH o o H m.m m m.m m m.H H m. c m. H m.H m H.Eov poomcmnp H+c H-c noooo one open AnnouoE :HV owom m.Hopm3 EOHH oocmpmHm Hooanenoov--HwH mHmHB ll 1. I‘ll ll‘I‘lll‘lill‘illl 77 Figure 14. Horizontal distribution of harpacticoid COpepOds in the tOp five cc of sand. i__. _ ______ __ 2..— _—___ .— ._—._—_. _...__ ._._——-—-_- — _ _ _ _- fl 1:l~i9g?:2H92J m1T¢TZTmLmiT.T_ XX‘lH mmwmwmmw ##\\ 0/ OJ 9 OH OJ 04 0H C, \%.$\ 111¢1rlqifi41:l ./ ’ ' ’ ’ ’ , 9 ’ x 8252m381 an 1:1n69_ 9. /. A +ov +6 c+ov. s CHOMWCMuovcno 4\\ \\ x D ..X . .1 x s .4—Hd“_ . _||.IXX|I|.I.\- [A ...§ .Xo . o ”45 XX\XX o\ .../.0\\ _ H _ ” ... 1-... an)... .\ \Jr, . ... x ‘XX‘ ‘7‘.-. o .\ M o \o I““‘)- ‘41) k . .. iii.\||II|I. %/ :nrlc.nllll;nn .Illxx '0]. all. 5» -H H... 8 XX\ ........ \ o o. a; -. -.iiux xulillitxx ........ -iiiii. LAX x .-..iflfi xx 3 n O o 0 O ”\u xx 4. X X X . . . I all x Ix x . .. . . . . Inlllli I: - - ...i I . --x-x : + L d— 1 4 4 4 4| 4‘14 ) {1* 4 11 {41 1 J1 lHl 1 J T d 4 4 14 H 1 5 1 J nu flu nu nv Av AU AU AU nu ad AU MN m m m m m MW P} 6 _.J O ”I an... 1 Ho ..., r; m no Cu 5 5 .4 h... 3 H9 7) 7) ._ On 0,. 1 «.1 l ocom mo .00 Hog mEchmmno mo 909552 }m 410 ‘T 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 (+) 13'! :annn f‘vanm mptnvflq 95153:. (in m) Figure 15. 79 Vertical distribution of harpacticoid COpepOdS. _~__.__*———4 Iliuu'otcnwsmhmu/cuzOrland 390 360 330 300 270 240 210 180 150 120 1961 1961 1962 1961 .1962 1961 1961 1962 Vertical distance (in cm.) 10 11 12 13 81 Harpacticoids were found to a depth of eight cm. below the surface; they have been known to occur as deep as 11 cm. (Pennak, 1940). Whether there was-a preferential- vertical distribution among the three Species of harpacticoids as was found in the studies of COpepOdS-inhabiting marine beaches (Nicholls, 1935) was not determined. Seasonal distribution: As with the distribution of oligochaetes along the beach, there seemed to be an indication in the data that during warmer periods harpacticoids move towards the hygro--and hydrOpsammon portions of the beach (Fig. 13) as well as.into the vertically deeper portions of the beach (Fig. 14). COpepods were collected from every transect and at all times of the year except in the April collection. Highest pOpulations were found in the May collection when, paradoxically, numbers of other psammon organisms were lowest (Fig. 3). High pOpulations were also found in October (T2, T3). lower ones in November and December, and the lowest pOpula- tions occurred in the June and July collections. NO COpepOdS were found in the April collection. Cladocera and Malacostraca Distribution In every instance cladocerans were collected from the Shoal region of the psammon, and, in nearly every instance from the tOp(cm. Table 6). This implies that this group was most likely an accidental visitor to the psammon rather than part of the psammolittoral fauna. In addition cladocerans, 82 unlike the COpepOdS, possessed no particular morphological adaptations for life in the sand interstecies. In two instances Single individuals of Hyalella azteka (Saussure) were found. These, like the cladocerans, represented incidental elements to the psammon. LarVal Insect MalaOOStraca DiStribution Larval dipterans occurred in a few samples but never in great numbers. Larvae of the families Tentapedidae, Delicapodidae, and Chironomidae were found but not in sufficient numbers to discern distributional patterns. An occasional Podura aquatica L.appeared in some samples as well but these were incidental to the psammon. Neel (1948) found larvae of two Diptera families: chironomids, which were infrequent, and ceratOpogonids of which eggs and larvae were common, in the Douglas Lake sand. He also found larval homophrinids (Coleoptera). Pennak (1940) found the distribution of Diptera larvae to exibit no maxima or minima along any portions of the psammon although his data, as in this study, was somewhat insufficient to make definitive evaluations. If one were to total (from Table 13) the number Of larvae found in the shoal region (+) against the number found in the beach portion (-) of the psammon, these numbers would be approximately equal indicating an even distribution throughout the sand. However, also apparent from table 13 is the fact that most of the larvae occurred in the hydro-- and hygropsammon regions; very few were found in the eupsammon. 83 H .m oH m HomH m .m .ooo o o o o o o c o H m wH H .m m HmmH m nmm .uoo o o o o o o cH cH H H .H m mmmH oH m .mm onso o o o o 0 0H H H .H o o o cH m HcmH o o o m .mH .>62 0 o o c o cH o o H o o o H .H o o o o m HcmH o o o o oH m .wH .noo o o o o c o o H m.m m m. m.H H m. o m. H m.H H.EOV Hoomcmhp m m nonoo one some E E Ammouoe :Hv owom n.20pm3 Soon oodmumHm .COHuanHumHo poomcH omsmeEHnu.mH mHmHE 84 m oH s o m H .m m HooH m .mm .eoo o o o o mm oH o H H .m m mooH m .sm HHso o o oH o o o o o o H H m.m m m.m m m.H H m. o m. m.H m H.26v sameness H+c H-c noose one open Ammouoe cHV owom n.90pw3 Bosh oocwpmHQ Hooanenoov--.mH mHmHH 85 Seasonally, because of the lack of data, one can make -- only a cursory statement regarding variations: Insect larvae in the Mud Lake psammon were most abundant in the October (T2, 3) collections and least abundant-in the December, April, May, and July collections (Fig. 3). Acari Malacostrace Distribution An arthrOpod group not previously reported from the psammon, but one which would be expected to occur there, was the Acari. Mites were found in every collection but two and in every transect. Though most mites were generally found in the tOp two cm. the distribution of these animals was Sporadic, there being neither a consistent horizontal (Fig. 15) nor vertical (Fig. 16) preference for a particular region of the psammolittoral zone. Vertically, individuals were not found below four cm. Landward, mites inhabited the psammon to (+) 4 m., which was the limit of landward collection. One would anticipate mites to inhabit all portions of the psammon above the water-line, however, a considerable number occurred in the Shoal region. AS far as could be determined all the individuals collected belonged to the Oribatei and not to the Hydracarina (water mites). A great number of mites were collected in the psammon below the water line. The greatest numbers of mites were found in December collections (Fig. 3) when one could expect the lowest popula- tions. No mites were found in the April and June collections and low numbers appeared in the October 18 and May samples. 86 H .m m momH cH 0H m .Nm hHSW wH o o o o o o om o wH oH H H .m m HomH Ho oH oH mm a .m .soo HHH o oH mm o o o mm H o m 3 H .m oH oH m HomH oH mm m .mm .ooo mH o o oH H H .H m HomH oH m .mH .>oz oH o oH o o o o mH mH H H .H oH m HomH m .wH .eoo o o o o o o o H H m m m m m m m.H H m o m. H m.H A.Eov Hoomcmsp ch H-c noose one open Homepoe GHV owcm m_poum3 Scum oonpmHm .COdethpwHU mpHEII . HH MHmHHHB 87 oH .m m momH m .H as: o o o o o o H H .m m HmmH m .mm .noo o o o o oH oH Ho H H m.m m m.m m m.H H m. m. H m.H m H.26v sameness . nonoo one memo n+c .o-v HomepoE :HV owcm m_HOpm3 EOHH ooswpmHm Hooannnoov--.HH mHmHe 88 Figure 16. Horizontal distribution of mites in the tOp five cc of sand. Number of organisms/"cc. or sand 510 480 450 420 390 360 330 300 270 240 210 180 150 120 90 60 30 15 89 D-m—Cl Oct 22, chum-aiJul 27, L‘s—'I—A D90 3' inn-0"} 001'; 18, 0—0 Nov 12, (D—XX-c May 1, 1961 1962 1961 1961 1961 1962 .0 ‘ '0‘ ’1‘ S "\‘ ~\~'—(‘.+ (+) Distance from water's edge (in M) 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 235 315 315 4:0 Figure 17. 90 Vertical distribution of mites. Number of organim/ cc. of sand . 91 510‘ 480‘ D—--D Oct 22, 1961 T2 ‘ ...... Jul 27, 1962 T2 < A—--A Dec 3, 1961 T2 450 e ..... e Oct 28, 1961 T1 ‘ (L --0 Nov 12. 1961 '1‘]. 4201 390w 360a 330- 270~ 240‘ 1 3 1:6 78910 Vertical distance (in cm.) 92 Other'MetaZOa Both gastrotrichs and turbellarians-have been found in previous psammon studies Pennak (1940) and Neel (1948). Representatives of both phyla were found in considerable numbers in the preliminary investigations of unpreserved sand samples. However, as in the case of the non—testaceous protozoans, the means of extracting and preserving psammon organisms destroyed the identity of these soft-bodied specimens with the result that they could not be included in the study. VI. SUMMARY An ecological survey study was undertaken in 1961- 1962 on the psammolittoral zone of Mud Lake (T.2 N., R.9 W., 3.8, Barry 00., Michigan) investigating the seasonal dis- tribution, Spatial distribution, and some of the environ- mental factors influencing the organisms inhabiting capillary interstecies of the sandy zone. Though, admittedly, there are many non—biological variables Operating to restrict the vertical distribution of psammo—microorganisms, a major non—biological factor whenever it was present appeared to be the black sulfide layer. The exact importance of this stratum in restricting the vertical occurrence of organisms was not know. Other environmental factors and their variance were discussed but no correlations with population characteristics were drawn. Biologically the following statements can be made about the Mud Lake Psammon: l. The psammo-organisms in approximate order of decreasing abundance were: Algae; diatoms, blue-green, green, Euglenophyta. Animals; testaceous protozoa, Nematoda, rotifers, c0pepods, oligochaetes, mites, insects, and cladocerans. 2. Horizontal, vertical, and seasonal distribution of the major taxons occurring in the sand were discussed: 93 94 a. The population maximum for the vast majority of psammo-organisms insofar as their horizontal distribution was concerned, occurred in the middle portions of the beach (i.e. the hygro- and eupsammon). b. Vertically, most of the organisms inhabited the tOp three cm. of’sand. Seasonal patterns in distribution were not, in most instances, distinct, though a few groups did exhibit distinct pOpulation maxima and minima at certain times of the year. SELECTED REFERENCES Anderson, R. O. 1959. A modified flotation technique for iorting bottom fauna samples. Limnology and Oceanography. :2. Si Fisher, R. A., Corbet, A. S., and Williams, C. B. 1943. The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sam 1e of an animal population. Jour. Anim. Ecol. 12(1): 2—58. Meyers, F. J. 1936. Psammolittoral rotifers of Lenape and Union Lake, New Jersey. Am. Mus. Novitates. 830: 1—22. Moffett, J. F. 1943. A limnological investigation of the dynamics of a sandy wave-swept shoal in Douglas Lake, Michigan. Trans. Am. Micro. Soc. 62(1):1-23. Moore, G. M. 1939. A limnological investigation of the microscopic benthic funa of Douglas Lake, Michigan. Ecol. Monog. 9:537—582. Neel, J. K. 1948. A limnological investigation of the psammon in Douglas Lake, Michigan, with especial reference to shoal and shore-line dynamics. Trans. Am. Micro. Soc. 67(1):1-50. Nicholls, A. G.‘ 1935. COpepods from the interstitial fauna of a sandy beach. Jour. Marine Biol. Assn. 20:379—405. Pennak, R. W. 1939. A new COpepod from the sandy beaches of a Wisconsin lake. Trans. Am. Micro. Soc. 58:224- 227. Pennak, R.W. 1940. Ecology of the microscopic metazoa inhabiting the sandy beaches of some Wisconsin lakes. Ecol. Monographs. 10:537-615. Pirrie, N. E., Bruce, J. R., and Moore, H. B. 1932. A quantitative study of the fauna of the sandy beach at Port Erin. Jour. Mar. Biol. Assn. 18:279-296. 95 w , .1' h- 3? HM- ..., n .. 1;“: :‘1 ufl‘ug ”'17!fl@fiiflfllflll 1111711111111?!“