if? A STUDY OF LICENSING PROCEDURES OF INDEPENDENT BOARDING HOMES IN MICHIGAN by .m Rachel Faude Wood A PROJECT REPORT Submitted to the Department of Social Work Michigan State University in Partial Fullfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SOCIAL WORK June 1955 Approved: , A 743é1 fl , B/OL43415LC/1/%{ ,c, /Z/<4L2 (J ( , ‘ Chairman, Research Committee \:7 (In, Head of Department ' THESIS - - fi—‘q—s ‘ . “‘4‘; "- Tm. 1-...“ 'fi‘fi.'r\-v a .-~./-~.‘h\./ ,4 .053 >1 .. T’c ”~av‘1' .34.; -- c. the a. .. O a ‘4., .2- cUIVlDo: CO : 4-5,. 4-D»; <. C l, e ‘ 8;. V DO? I; 8 .~ v w—x O ,4. A V - *w“ I fiu‘ v..-~.-- K), J.‘ c e C ‘ ‘cc La V, a r; w '. m L"..-- 9 ~ 1‘ dc CG 0 “$— L. U 5).]; ‘AV o‘-~.,—n Wm 5;; V-A-~.’ n“ \J‘ P“ '0‘“, D o “$e-‘Q ‘_ a u l I» ”M. ‘- Cr; 3 -c. v.- Jvnfi cfl ‘ - T‘Q fl d _; O I .‘1 CD 1’ _ nKOr Ci ~_L C a pfil ‘- o ‘ ‘. C08 u I ’3 an ac L- .n5 \4‘ 1 ‘— O4" 0""; 7‘ ‘— e w r; '_.’ H“. J. \I .y could no CUC E ii TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER Page I INTRODUCTION -------------------------- 1 II HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ................. 5 III METHODS AND PROCEDURES EMPLOYED IN THIS STUDY .................... 9 IV ANALYSIS OF DATA ---------------------- 1h V SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS --------------- 38 APPENDIX ------------------------------------------------- A2 BIBLIOGRAPHY --------------------------------------------- 62 iii LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1 Main Omissions on Boarding Home Applications ------------ IS 2 Lapse of Time Between Application and License Issued---- 16 3 Location of the Initial Interview ----------------------- 17 h Type of Clearance made on Applicants -------------------- l9 5 Home Visits during the Study------------------.' ......... 21 6 Method of Interviewing Foster Parents ------------------- 22 7 Coverage of Social History in Boarding Home Study ------- 27 8 Relation of the Study to type of Child Care ............. 33 iv CMMRI INTRODUCTION Boarding care is the provision of an environment for a child outside his own home which meets his physical needs and provides for his mental and emotional growth. Uhder Act #7, Public Acts lth (first extra session) the responsibility for providing supervision of boarding care in Michigan is given to the State Department of Social Welfare. This responsibility is discharged by the Children's Division of the department through its licensing program. In order to protect the physical, mental and emotional growth needs of children in foster homes, certain standards for boarding homes and methods of ascertaining whether these have been upheld have been out- lined. The purpose of this study is to determine whether, under this licensing program, these standards and methods are being adhered to and thus the physical, mental and emotional growth of the children in board- ing care is being safeguarded. A further purpose of the study is to explore methods for increasing the protection of children in boarding homes by improving the quality of boarding home studies through improved administrative procedures in the licensing program. There are three types of boarding homes in Michigan: those used by the various child placing agencies, those used by the probate courts and the independent homes. The latter, for children placed by their own parents, and investigated, licensed and supervised by representatives of the department of social welfare in each county, are the ones from which the sampling was taken for this study. -2- The responsibility for actual licensing of the 6,000 boarding homes within the state of Michigan lies within the state boarding home unit of the Department of Social Welfare. As supervisor of this unit, the writer became increasingly aware of the problems as shown in the case studies which were forwarded by courts and agencies and their deviations from the state office procedure and policy. Although some questions were forwarded from time to time on the approximately 2200 boarding homes licensed by the independent workers, little was known about the actual procedure prior to the recommending of a license. From questions asked by the field workers and those raised at various children's workers' institutes, it was believed there was variation in the methods of pro~ cedure and deviation from the present policies in the licensing of independent homes. Thus a study of present procedures was made. The representatives of the department of social welfare doing the licensing of independent homes are divided into two groups; children‘s workers and bureau workers. The former, in the lower part of the state, are placed where there are the heaviest concentrations of foster homes. In the upper part of the lower peninsula and the upper peninsula, they may, however, cover a territory of several counties. Thus, in 31 of the 83 counties of Michigan, licensing is done by the children's workers; and in the other 52 by employees of the Bureau of Social Aid, another division of the department. These workers are all supervised by the supervisory field staff, the district consultants. All except four of the present children's workers have at least one year of graduate training in social work. These workers also carry a caseload of children's cases. The bureau worker has less boarding homes -3- to service but will carry, also, a caseload in the categorical reliefs. One of the bureau workers had graduate training in social work. A number had years of in-service training in the Bureau of Social Aid. Assumptions and Working Hypothesis It is assumed that there is a need for more specific outline of the procedures to be used by children's workers and bureau workers in the licensing of independent homes. It is believed that in many counties minimal records may be kept while in some counties homes may be licensed without any home study or prOper forms on file. It is further believed that policies and rules may be disregarded either in total or in part, and licensing may be done in direct violation of rules and regulations or policies. It is further assumed that untrained social workers would tend to direct their study to the physical needs of the client, while the trained workers would tend to secure facts pertaining to physical needs, but in addition, would show greater understanding of mental and emotion- al factors which might influence the growth processes of the child in foster care. Because the training in the Bureau of Social Aid is directed to- wards emphasis on the use of a policy manual, it is assumed that the bureau workers would tend to follow the outlines and policies more completely than would the children's workers. It is also assumed the emphasis for the latter is awareness of relationships. If it is determined that trained workers are less held to proced- ural requirements and untrained workers more controlled by procedural requirements, and if the quality of work as done by these two groups -4- varies, it is assumed that evidence indicates that present procedures of licensing may not be as effective as they should be. It is assumed that if the relationship between quality of work and adherence to procedural requirements does not indicate effectiveness of procedure, the implications could be (1) change in procedures, (2) meas- ures to help the workers use the present procedures more effectively, (3) different procedures for Bureau of Social Aid and Children's Workers, (A) different procedures for trained or untrained workers. CHAPTER II HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Licensing of boarding homes is based on the premise that children are the responsibility of the state as well as the parent. Since the parent is not always aware of the problems which may arise from place- ment, this public service helps in preventing placement of children in homes which may be injurious to their normal development. The first state law requiring the licensing of boarding homes was passed in Massachusetts in 1892. Since then, most states have passed laws granting a state department the authority to license foster homes in which minor children are placed. While licensing of boarding homes has been a law only during the 20th century in most states, foster home care goes back to the old pat- tern of indenture which was first recorded in Michigan in 1817.1 In 1871, a report of special commissioners showed an awareness of the strengths and hazards of foster placement. Institutional life should be avoided as much as possible as we consider the rearing and training in families as more natural and far superior in all respects, while we would also strongly urge the necessity of supervision of indentured or adopted children by some competent officer, who shall fre- quently visit them and ascertain if the child is well cared for and the conditions of the indenture are being fullfilled. 1 Laws of the Territory of Michigan II, 115-116 2 Report of Special Commissioners to Examine Penal, Reformatory and Charitable Institutions of the State of Michigan 1871, p.77 -6- It was at this time that a law3 was passed to establish a state school for dependent and neglected children. The eligible children included only those over four and under 16 years who were sound in mind and body as well as neglected. The object of the lawn was to provide a temporary home only until the children could be placed in family homes. In 1913, the first law in Michigan5 requiring licensing of board- ing homes for children, with responsibility directed to the Board of Corrections and Charities, was passed. The board was authorized to investigate child caring facilities and prescribe rules and regulations to protect the best interests of children. An attorney general's deci- sion6 in 19lh ruled that the Board of Corrections and Charities also had the authority to inspect boarding homes and to make rules and regulat- ions for them. In 1919, the legislature passed Act 136, providing for the licens- ing and regulation of boarding homes for children. Many of the provis- ions were substantially the same as those under Act 300 in 1913. The boarding parents were, as provided under Act 300, required to keep a record of each child received, boarding homes could be inspected at any time; and violators could be fined not less than $25 or more than $100, given imprisonment in the county jail for not less than 30 days or more than 90 days, or both, at the discretion of the court. Any person con- victed under the authority of the act could not be granted a license or be permitted to be connected directly or indirectly with any agency or 3 Public Acts of Michigan 1871, Act 172 A Ibid. section 13 5 Public Acts of Michigan 1913, Act 300 6 Report of Attorney General of Michigan 1914, p.h04 -7- person caring for children for a period of 10 years. An important addition under the 1919 law was that the license should state the name of the licensee, particular premises to which applied and the maximum number of children to be maintained or boarded at any one time. The license applied only to the premises occupied by the licensee at the time of issuance and a change of residence automatically terminated the same. The State Welfare Department was created in 19217 and the State Welfare Commission was made the legal successor to the State Board of Corrections and Charities. In 1931, Act 136 was amended8 and the age limit of children covered under licensing of foster homes was raised from 15 to 17 years. The State Department of Social Welfare was created in 1939, and the Social Welfare Commission was made a legal successor to the State Welfare Commission. In 19h3 a bill relating to the licensing of boarding homes was introduced into the legislature but was not reported out of committee. However, Governor Kelley inaugurated a youth guidance program including a state wide youth guidance committee. Following the development of this lay organization, many laws relating to juveniles were passed including the law under which the Department of Social Welfare operates today.9 This law requires all boarding homes and child welfare agencies, as well as child caring institutions, child placing agencies, boarding 7 Public Acts of Michigan 1921, Act 163 8 Public Acts of Michigan 1931 amending Act 136, P.A. 1919, Act 262 9 Public Acts of Michigan l9hh (first extra session) Act A7 -8- schools, summer camps, day care centers and nursery schools to have a license issued by the State Department of Social Welfare. Revisions to Act #7 in 1951 provided for licensing of homes whether the child was working in it or not and whether or not he was receiving consideration for such work. Also, boarding parents were required to notify the Department of Social Welfare of the coming and/or leaving of any foster child under 17 who was not placed by a probate court or an agency. In 1952 provision was made so that any reasonable order for standards of care and supervision could be enforced through injunction in circuit court. The writer found the literature in this field extremely limited. The only similar study found was an investigation made in 1950 in Kent County, Michigan by a representative of the State Department of Social Welfare.10 This was very limited, however, as only 20% or eight of the independent homes in that county were studied and in a much less complete manner than this study. Those homes were all serviced by children's workers with some graduate training. 10 Administrative Review of Kent County, State Department of Social Welfare 1950 CHAPTER III METHODS AND PROCEDURES EMPLOYED IN THIS STUDY In order to develop adequate standards of child care as provided under Act #7, #6 rules and regulations have been worked out, covering the boarding home, the boarding family and the boarding child. There is also a policy manual covering general policies to be applied in the licensing of such homes and referring to the above-mentioned rules and regulations. Certain forms, including an outline for boarding home studies, have been adopted and are to be used in accordance with the minimum instructions in the policy manual. While it is probably true that all workers (court, agency and in- dependent) may need clarification of rules and policies, it was decided to review only independent homes because they are (l) the direct respon- sibility of the department and (2) definite instructions as to procedure may be outlined to the workers servicing them and specific procedures required. All material relative to the licensing of boarding homes in Michigan goes through the state boarding home unit. In licensing independent homes, only a certification slip showing name, address of foster parents and Specifications as to number of children; their ages, sex, whether they are there full time or for day care, the type of license recommended and the agency recommending the license is received. All material pertaining to independent boarding homes - application, home study, correSpondence and reports - are kept in the county office. It was, therefore, only by review of the county records that information as to the actual practice, awareness of rules and adherence to instructions, could be established. -9- Ill‘lllI'IIlll -10- Because of the impossibility of visiting each county within a reason- able period of time, the cooperation of the district consultant was se- cured in reading records. It was also assumed, since the consultant supervised such workers, that he would be more aware of the manner in which his workers operated. In checking the location of independent boarding homes, it was decid- ed to omit two areas in the state from this study. One was Wayne County (because of the large number of homes and the multiplicity of problems) and the other, seven counties in the upper part of the lower peninsula (where there was no consultant and only seven independent boarding homes in the entire district). There were seven counties in which there were no independent boarding homes on January 1, 1955, the date that independ- ent boarding homes in Michigan were surveyed prior to this study. This made a total of 68 of the 83 counties in which records were reviewed. Of these, lh3 were cases in 30 counties serviced by children's workers and 133 cases in 38 counties serviced by bureau workers. The total study of which this study is a part was undertaken for the department of social welfare. In studying all licensing procedures for independent boarding homes four points were covered; (1) inquiries about licensing, (2) disposal of original applications, (3) originally licensed boarding homes and (A) renewals. As indicated above, this study on the original licensing of boarding homes is part of the larger study, the questionaires used were modifica- tions and expansions of ones which had been made up in 1950 and used in a review made by a department representative of eight boarding homes in Kent County. They followed the general outline and breakdown of the -11- outline for ”Study of a Foster Home" which is given to each worker and which is referred to earlier in this report as part of the procedure for licensing boarding homes. For three months before these questionaires were made up, a record was kept of the field worker's questions relative to procedure and to deviations from the norm, as set up in "Rules and Regulations", the ll and the policy manual. The areas in which there department outline were the most questions were then incorporated under the appropriate headings in the questionaire. In revising the questionaires, the author read cases in Ingham County and later did the studies in three of the larger bureau counties. These questionaires were then divided into four main parts: Appli- cation, Investigation, Impressions and Recommendations. The largest area came under the investigation or home study and the sub-headings under this item were taken directly from the department outline for study of a foster home. The questionaires were then sent to each consultant with the request that they be used on five cases in each county, or, if there were less than five boarding homes cases in a particular county, on all of the active cases. In the four largest counties included in this study - Kent, Ingham, Genesee and Oakland - ten cases were read. This made a total of 276 cases. 133 of these were serviced by workers from the Bureau of Social Aid and 1h3 by Children's Division workers from the Department of Social Welfare. 11 See Appendix 2-3 -12- The policy manual, Rules and Regulations and the department outline for study of a boarding home each include instructions for licensing pro- cedure. Inasmuch as there is an overlapping of instructions for licensing and use of boarding homes, it was felt that the data obtained must be re- lated to all three. Thus in the following chapter, we have included the policy, rule and/or instructions under which the field worker should be operating in accordance with the boarding home law. The total number of cases read varied in number from district to district according to the concentration of boarding homes. In evaluating the above methods, we were aware that there would probably be some difference in the manner in which the consultant would evaluate the cases in his territory principally because the emphasis on boarding care varied somewhat in proportion to the number of cases and prOblems in each district. With ten different people reviewing cases, we would have ten different interpretations of each question, each in accordance with the individual attitude toward licensing of boarding homes, the quality of work and perhaps even toward the worker doing the actual study. There was no attempt at this time to evaluate the actual quality of work done under each section but only as to whether or not the worker was meeting minimum standards. Although space was left for comments in several areas, few were made that would be of particular value to this study. Thus, a worker might have mentioned family re- lationships but not recorded or even been aware of the details or impli- cations involved. It was also thought that because procedures were not outlined in detail in most areas a majority of negative answers might indicate the -13- need for more complete instructions. In filling out the questionaires, one consultant might base his answers on his knowledge of how the caseworker operated rather than on the material included in the record. However, it was assumed (and as it happened correctly) that comments would be included or the question marked "unknown" if this were true. We were also aware that this method would review a larger proportion of the total Bureau of Social Aid cases than Children's Worker's cases, however it did not seem that this would invalidate the results. CHAPTER IV Analysis of Data In analyzing the data this study endeavors to show the total per- centage of workers who followed present licensing procedures. These were broken down into two groups, bureau workers and children's workers. As stated earlier, the bureau workers were considered untrained, the child- ren's workers trained in social work. Applications In the boarding home manual, Section u23.1 states "Section 3 of Act #7 requires that applications shall be made on forms provided by the de- partment and in the manner prescribed." Section 656 states, “The board- 12 must be on file in the county unit ing parents signed applications before a recommendation can be made to the state office to issue the license." In this study, there was little difference between the bureau work- ers' cases and the children's workers' cases. In the former, 99 percent and in the latter 97 percent included signed applications. Thus, in 98 percent of the cases, a signed application was on file. It was felt, however, that two percent was too large a figure as there should be no deviation to the above rule. A number of questions on the application were unanswered in each of the two groups of cases. Although the percentages were not as high as it 12 See Appendix 4 -1h- tll‘ll'l‘lll lull] ll] 1‘1!) -15- had been expected, 32 percent of the cases by bureau workers and Al per cent of the cases by children's workers had partially completed applica- tions. The areas which were unanswered were substantially the same for each group. The main omissions are shown in Table 1. TABLE I OMISSIONS ON BOARDING HOME APPLICATIONS Omissions Bureau of Social Aid Children's Worker Total Community 12% lb% 1A% Religion 8 13 10 Recreation 8 9 8 Motive for boarding 6 7 6 Sleeping arrangements 5 5 5 Other questions which were unanswered on a number of applications were; age of children desired, boarding source, details regarding child in home, directions for reaching, education, health, marriage, military service, number and type of children wanted, previous boarding experience, ref- erences and type of care to be given. The lapse of time between date of application and the date the license was issued is shown in Table 2, as shown on page 16. In the consultant's opinions, the applications were acted upon prompt- ly in relation to the problems presented in 76 percent of the bureau cases. They did not feel that the children's workers were as prompt. In only 61 percent of their cases did the consultant state the study had been processed promptly. -16- TABIE 2 LAPSE OF TIME BETWEEN APPLICATION AND LICENSE ISSUED Time Lapse Bureau Social Aid Children's Worker Total Within month 11% 11% 11% 1 month less than 2 21 l2 l7 2 months less than 3 16 21 18 3 months less than A 8 15 12 h months less than 5 2 3 3 5 months less than 6 2 7 h 6 months less than 12 h 12 8 Over year A 2 3 Unknown 32 16 2h Total 100 100 100 In the 2% percent cases under ”unknown”, the application was not dated and the records did not indicate the date of first contact. This is one area in which there may have been much variation; the inclusion of the phrase"in relation to the problems presented" indi- cated that the consultant could use his own judgement as to whether or not the case was processed promptly. Thus one consultant might feel that a case was acted upon promptly when six months had elapsed since the first inquiry while another would think it should be done within a month. The comments, however, indicated that in many of the districts the consult- ant felt the local office was understaffed and that the children's workers were putting more emphasis on supervision of children's cases than on the licensing of boarding homes. -17- Investigations There is no indication in the manual as to a preferred manner of handling the initial interview. The department outline states, "These contacts usually will include an office interview for application (there may be several office interviews, of course) a visit to the home where other members of the family can be met and the physical facilities examined and a second home visit for further clarification and strength- ening of relationships........." In addition to the above suggestion regarding an office interview, it was believed that asking the client to come into the office for the initial interview might be a time-saving, efficient manner of screening those who obviously would not meet licensing standards and might also eliminate those who were interested in agency placement or adoption. It was also hoped that this might place responsibility on the client for the initial interview. It was not known whether this was general practice at present. In this sampling, there was little difference between the work of the bureau and children's workers. Both were making home calls on the major- ity of clients for the initial interview. The interviews were held as shown in Table 3. TABLE 3 LOCATION OF INITIAL INTERVIEW Location Bureau Social Aid Children‘s Worker Total Held in office 26% 30% 28% Held in home 61 60 60 Not recorded 13 - 10 12 Total 100 100 100 -18- Thus, in the initial interview, it appeared to be general practice with both bureau and children's workers to make home calls. In checking those cases where the greatest period of time elapsed between application and issuance of the license against the place where the first interview was held, there was no particular pattern shown. Section 657.1 of the manual states, "The outline for study of a foster home, which may be found in appendix II is offered as a guide for the county unit's recording of the initial study of a home. Vhether or not the outline is to be followed without deviation is a matter to be decided by the district consultant and the county unit. However, all sub- jects discussed in the outline mug: be covered in the home study report." It was not known in how many cases there was any outline used. It was found that in 92 percent of the Bureau of Social Aid cases and in 81 percent of the children's workers cases, an outline was used, a total of 86 percent of the cases. Of these, the department outline was used in 88 percent of the bureau cases and in 77 percent of the children's work- ers' cases. No one particular outline was used in the others. Thus the bureau workers used an outline more than the children's workers. The outlines were used in many ways, however, and the consultant's comments ranged from "used in a limited manner", ”very brief”, "fair” to used in a very effective manner”, ”good coverage". One consultant commented on cases recorded by one children's worker, "process record- ing used and all subjects covered though not in outline form". These five cases were included under "other" as it Was in accordance with section 657.1 as quoted above even though an actual outline was not -19- used. Several consultants also commented that the records were read more easily and coverage was more apt to be complete if an outline was fol- lowed. Section 655 of the manual states, "The names of all persons wishing to apply for a boarding home license should be cleared with the local soc- ial service exchange. If there is not a local exchange, the name should be cleared with the bureau, the county welfare department and the probate court.” Section h33.2, "A record of persons known to the department is kept by means of a central index. Agencies, probate courts, children's workers and bureaus may make a clearance through the state office of the depart- ment. This should not be done automatically on each inquiry but only after it has been determined that a home study is to be made.” Clearance was made on these 276 cases as shown in Table A. TABLE A TYPE OF CLEARANCE MADE ON APPLICANTS Clearance Bureau Social Aid Children's Worker Total Central index 2h% 16% 20% Local exchange 10 52 32 ther agencies 5O 16 . 32 11‘ Total 8h 81+ 84 ‘ In the counties studied there was no local social service exchange where 78 percent of the bureau cases and 31 percent of the children’s workers' cases were located. Some of the above cases were cleared both locally and through the state office but in only four of the bureau cases and 13 of the children's workers' cases was no clearance made. .1 .C a J ab v,- ' o- S e S a.“ a .1. a D Thi xpecteu. ‘ might 0e e :4 S i _. v I of the ‘” - nuzre -e v - 'fi uaA '--: §-° L45 0 ‘- I. - '“CNO .qabgk, oeen g .C I ‘y—o .A..A‘\r\.l ~r i a “wr‘é'f Ay- V‘V-‘ G y-ofifi‘ V- ..o l“. .- n y‘“ f‘v“ (ne‘ya fin: 3A-”; .- lo e out o u - r VA. were V n -..D a -21- TABLE 5 HOME VISITS DURING STUDY Number of Visits Bureau Social Aid Children's Worker Total 1 29% 203:. 21a 2 2O 28 23 3 1h 18 16 1+ 7 1+ 6 5 2 l 6 3 2 More 1 2 2 Unknown* 2h 28 26 *Where the material was not recorded it was shown in this table as un- known. In the majority of bureau cases, particularly those located in rural areas, where only one home call was noted before the recommendation to license the home, the consultant included such comments as "worker has known this family personally", "family old friends of the worker”, or "This family has been on worker‘s ADC caseload". In only three cases rere there similar notations about the children's worker. It was also apparent that a less complete home study was made on those cases on which the above comments were included. While it is definitely stated in the outline that it is necessary to talk with the foster parents and other members of the family in order to know them, to understand family relationships and the attitudes of all members of the family towards taking a child into the home, it is also -22- implied in the following rules regarding acceptance of children by all members of the family that this should be done. Rule 25 states, "All members of the boarding family shall be willing to accept the boarding child into the home as a member of the family group. Rule 26, ”The persons in charge of the boarding home shall be of suit- able age and temperament to care for children, shall understand the needs of children; shall be capable of handling an emergency situation promptly and intelligently and shall be willing to c00perate fully with the child- ren's own parents and/or the supervising agency." TABLE 6 METHOD OF INTERVIEWING FOSTER PARENTS Method of Interview Bureau Social Aid Children's Worker Total Both parents interviewed 59% 63% 61% Individually h3 6 25 Together M3 22 32 Both Ways 25 32 29 Unknown 2 3 2 Other members of the family were seen in #5 percent of the Bureau of Social Aid cases and in 60 percent of the children's workers' cases. In 23 of the bureau cases and 15 of the children's workers' cases, there were no other members of the family than the boarding mother. In 20 bureau cases and 13 children's workers' cases this was not recorded. Thus, in this area, a larger percentage of the children‘s workers adhered to the rules by interviewing members of the family, in recording the material and in the type of home selected for study inasmuch as slight- -23- 1y more of the children's workers cases were composed of complete families. The first general area in the outline for foster home study is Community which includes type of neighborhood and resources of the community. The latter is broken down into health services, education, religion and recreation. A general description of the community was given in 89 percent of the bureau workers' cases and in 82 percent of the children's workers' cases. There was little variation between the coverage as shown by the bureau workers and that shown by the children's workers in this section, other than medical services which was included by more bureau workers. There was more variation in the area of the boarding home. The general description of the home was covered in 89 percent of the total number of cases. The bureau workers included the description in 98 per cent of their cases, while the children's workers in only 81 percent. The total number of rooms was given in almost all of the cases, 95 per cent,and there was little variation between groups. Rule #0 states, "Each child shall sleep alone or with only one other child of the same sex. Boys and girls over 5 years of age shall not sleep in the same room. Children, shall under no circumstances, occupy beds with adults. Sleeping rooms should provide adequate oppor- tunities for rest and privacy." An awareness of this rule was shown in 80 percent of the total cases reviewed. However, the children's workers covered it in more of their cases than did the bureau workers. Rule 9 states, "The home shall be clean, sanitary, free from vermin -2h- and in good repair.” Housekeeping standards were recorded positively in 86 percent of the total number of cases. The percentage of BSA workers was slightly higher, 91 percent than the children's workers, 83 percent, recording on this. Rule 11 specifies, "The heating equipment shall have a proper capa- city, be so located and operated to maintain a temperature of approxi- mately 70 degrees under average winter weather conditions." Rule 12, "Ventilation shall be provided in all rooms where children eat, sleep and play by windows which can be opened." Rule 13, ”window space and artificial lighting shall be sufficient to prevent eyestrain." Ruly 22, "Play space shall be available and free from hazards which might be dangerous to life and health of the child. Play area shall be kept free from litter, rubbish and inflamable material at all times." The above rules were all included in one section, as it was felt that they all cover similar areas. The total number of studies in- cluding these was lower than hertofore as only 6h percent showed that light, heat, ventilation and play space were included. There was slight variation between the two groups of workers on this question. Rule 10 states, "The home shall be so constructed, arranged and maintained as to provide adequate protection for the health and safety of the occupants........Representatives of the health department or fire marshall's office shall be admitted to the home at any time for the pur- pose of inspection." The outline, mentioned hertofore, states, "Note condition of grounds, repair of house,........possible fire hazards." 3 Ill" '1 Ila. -25- Both groups were very low in adhering to this rule as only hl percent of the total number of cases mentioned fire hazards or lack of them. The bureau workers, however, appeared much more aware of this as they recorded fire hazards in 55 percent of their cases while the children's workers re- corded it in only 27 percent of theirs. Rule 15 states, "The home shall be provided with an ample supply of safe water. If the water is Obtained from a well, the supply shall con- form to the regulations for semi-public ground water supplies issued by the Michigan Department of Health." Rule 16, "The sewage disposal system shall meet state or local health department requirements as provided by Act 273, P.A. 1939.” Rule 17, "Garbage shall be placed in covered containers and disposed of at regular intervals.” Rule 18, "All milk shall come from cows that have been tested for tuberculosis and Bangs disease and found to be free of these diseases. When purchased, milk, etc. shall come from sources approved by the De- partment of Agriculture and shall be pasturized when such products are reasonable available." Rule 19, ”Refrigeration or cold storage space shall be available for the care of perishable foods." Information was not covered adequately in this area as in only #8 percent of the bureau cases and 30 percent of the children's workers cases was an awareness of health hazards shown. Of the total number of cases, in only 39 percent was it mentioned either that a hazard was pre- sent or that there appeared to be none. There is no comment as to procedure in obtaining the social history -26- in the policy manual. In the department outline, it is discussed briefly under Purpose of Study when it states, ”The suggested content presupposes that the foster home study is based on case work method and that there is a process in which the applicants and the case worker participate, from which should result: (1) an understanding on the part of the worker as to the kind of family that is applying. (2) an understanding on the part of each of what the family can give to a foster child to further his physical, emotional and social growth. (3) an appreciation of whether the family can share responsibility for the well being of the child with the worker and the child's own parents. (h) a knowledge of the financial status, the physical set-up and facilities for caring for a child." As one of the subjects discussed in the outline, according to Item 657.1 of the manual it "must be covered in the home study report." In the majority of the cases the social history was included. TABLE 7 COVERAGE OF SOCIAL HISTORY IN BOARDING HOME STUDY Social History Bureau Social Aid Children's Worker Total foster father 83% 71% 76% foster mother 85 93 89 own children 73 77 76 -27- Of the total number of homes, 8 percent had no other members of the family. Thus, in only 18 percent of the total number of cases was the social history omitted. In this area, the bureau workers and the child- ren's workers both averaged 80 percent compliance with instructions as cited above. Although it is not indicated in any instruction that all items in .J the outline must be included, a question was asked as to whether or not the social history included identifying information for each member of the family (family relationships, education, and special training of members of the family, significant physical or mental characteristics, etc.). These are mentioned in the outline, and it was felt that this question would give some indication as to whether or not the social history included what might be termed, "main points” without asking for too much detail. It was found these varied from the previous figures in that only 59 percent of the bureau cases, 8h percent of the children's workers' cases and 69 percent of the total included such information. Thus, while the figures were very close in both instances in the bureau workers' cases this detailed information was not included. Marital status is included only as a sub-heading in the outline. It has been assumed by the state office that Rule 2h, "Relationships with- in the family shall be such that a wholesome atmosphere for the child will be assured." has not been met in cases where the applicant has a common-law marriage or cannot prove marriage. Thus, the question of the marital status of the boarding parents was included in this study. r1. ‘6 '\ -25- This was recorded in 92 percent of each, the bureau cases and the children's worker's cases. Thus in this area there was no difference in the inclusion of this information. In applying the above Rule 2A to the material as included in the records by the caseworkers, it was found that again relationships were covered in the majority of cases. The children's workers, however, appeared more aware of this issue as in 82 percent bureau cases and in 9h percent children's workers cases, a total of 88 percent family relationships were shown. Rule 32 states, “The financial status of the boarding family must be secure". There has been some discussion about whether or not a statement that the family is financially secure meets the requirements of the above rule. However while ”financial information” is a sub- heading in the outline, specific information regarding occupation, income, resources, employment, etc. also are included in that out- line, they were included in this study. As many workers feel it is an invasion of the privacy of the boarding family to obtain more than broken U) minimum information about the above-mentioned finances, this wa into two parts. First, as to whether or not the study mentioned the financial status of the boarding family and second, as to the specific information. In the latter, eight items were mentioned as they are in the outline. If less than four of these items were circled or underlined, the question was shown as No. In the first question 111 of the bureau cases and 119 children's workers' cases, a total of 230, the answer was yes. This is 83 per- cent in each group. The second, showed that only 59 percent bureau .0 -29- cases and 50 percent children's workers cases, a total of 5h percent of the cases read included th specific information as shown in the outline. In this instance, the bureau workers followed the outline a little more closely than the children's workers although there was not a great dif— ference. Rule 30 states, "The foster mother or another adult of the family must be able to demonstrate that they have adequate time for the care of the foster children." The outline states; ”It is assumed the board- ing mother will ngt'be employed outside the home.” In only 2 percent of the bureau homes was the mother employed out- side the home. In 8 percent of the children's workers' homes the board- ing mother was employed. However in 10 percent of the latter cases this was not recorded. In 98 percent bureau cases and in 82 percent child- ren's workers' cases the boarding mother was known to be in the home full time. Thus in 90 percent of the total cases, the boarding mother was not employed. There might not have been as much variation had the children's workers' recorded the information as suggested in the outline, however, at this time more accurate information was available in the bureau worker's cases. Rule 23, ”All members of the household must be in such physical and mental health as will not affect adversely either the health of the child or the quality and manner of his care." An item shown in the outline under ”Members of the Family as Individuals” states, "Physical condition and general health history. Note any serious illness or operations." ”Personality and attitudes, .....Note any evidence of sensitiveness, seclusiveness, violent temper, 3'3: ‘ -30- swings of moods, exaggerated attitude on any subject." In 8h percent bureau cases and 88 percent children's workers' cas s, a total of 86 percent of the cases read included some mention of the physical and mental health of the foster family. Rule 23 also states, ”A statement from a qualified physician shall be required indicating there are no health problems in the household det- rimental to the foster children”. 12 The department supplies two forms, one CD-BH-16 J a physical examin- ation blank for boarding home applicants and CD-BH-léalh letter authoriz- ing the physician to release information regarding the health of the family. Manual item 658 explains the purpose of the physical examination, relates it to Rule 23 and specifies that ”each family will be asked to sign form CD-BH-l6a, permitting release of medical information”. It further outlines the procedure for the worker to follow in filing form CD-BH-l6 in the county file. This area of procedure is outlineiin more detail than any other in the manual. In asking whether either of the above mentioned forms were on file, included under "ves" was any in which the consultant stated there was a written report from a physician on the premise that if that were in file, permission to release information would probably have been sent to the doctor with the physical examination blank at an earlier date. In #5 percent of the bureau cases and in 70 percent of the child- ren's workers' cases, a total of 58 percent of the cases reviewed, was 13 See Appendix 5 1h See Appendix 6 L3 ’3‘ *‘no “7" A} we pm 8 v.7 ~ "‘ “"‘ V‘ ‘ the p oc euiic -cllo In this a-ea the bureau i.or‘, a . n ' I I -. 0 . '. l . _ ‘ a ' . O ' ‘. . ' l . . . n . . , . o. _ u . . " s. .Q . I‘ a I’ ' ’ ' . .. c e . . I. ", o . _ . a. . I 'a , a . . . J a ‘. ‘ . - - a -v u c . ‘ e _ . ' .. "I a c I 4" ' . . .‘r , ‘ . ' ' I. ‘ | e . . a , . Q ' . 3 .. . . a, . ' . 1 . | ' " ‘ I . . ' o e ‘ ‘ ' a . e ‘ I . . e-ev , . I. .1 A ’ ' ' I \.v | . I- . a _ ' o e I. ‘ a. . . ‘ ‘ ' I , - . . . t . . ‘ . . v e f ‘ v a, , . e . ' ‘ " O J; ' '1 _ ’91s I . e c U . . e .' t'._ e u ' ,. '. .. ' . . .. ‘ ' - D l , o . O C v C o :.4 ‘ . . L. ‘ u "l . y. ‘ o ' . . Iv: ‘ ..e u . . . . ‘ - . . . I e.- t 4 I ' . o. I to . u . . ‘ | ' e . . .n . e . l; _ . ' l ' '- ) "‘ -' ’ .. ,' - (o. a _. i ‘ ‘ ‘ I . . .- ‘ . I. ' . ' A . . . I .' . . ‘ ‘ .' n . ,‘ ’ O I . . a e e ' t... .I g I D I ' 1 .. ' . ’ ."’ 'a- . c u . , . . . ‘ -r. . . ‘ I I v. .e . ' n I « 0 J ' I . . . ' ~ b . . e ' ’ i . I u . u | . ' . . 'l. ' a . , o 5 . . Q o, , § . .. a ' I ‘ p . a a . . ‘e - u u. . o o r 0.. .- . O Q . I ‘ . 'O The Family as a Group: Marital Status: Present marriage, date and place. Were there any 1: . circumstances? If childless, why? Previous marriages of eiths band or wife. How terminated? Finances: Occupation, income, and other resources: Give man's empl history, his present occupation, place of employment, length of ice with present firm and weekly salary. Information about lifc ance, savings, and other assets indicating stability of family. Amount of debts outstanding may be significant. List any emplo: of other members of the family. It is assumed the boarding not! will not be employed outside of the home. Note any work accept: be done in the home. Are families receiving any form of public aistance? If so ,‘ explain fully. Congeniality: Evidence of affection and harmony of interests, consid tion for each other and for all members of the family. Sources disagreement. Which is dominant personality? Atmosphere in the Standing in the community and participation in comunity life. Foster Child e of child wanted - age, sex, number, appearance, nationality, fem achground, personality, day care or full-time overnight care. What ' the attitude of each member of the household toward receiving boardim children? Is the foster father willing to accept boarding children a: help them? How do own children feel about sharing things with boardi: children? Indicate reasons why foster parents are interested in bear» children, and relate these where possible to their attitudes regardim their own childhood, and their experiences as parents. Are they inte: ested in children of a particular age? Sex? Will they be able and a: they interested in caring for children with behavior problems? What 1 of board do they expect to receive? Is money to be received for care their primary reason for boarding children? Discuss with them their ideas regarding discipline and care. Will they receive visits from 1:] children's own parents with understanding? And understand that only 1 the children work out their feelings about their own families will th: be able to adjust in the boarding home? Will child be a member of th« family group and participate in coumunity activities. Children now in thehcme - give name, age, school grade, legal status ISngtH 3f "Eli's mn'é'm and any other pertinent information about ' chi 1d . Give nuns, address, employment of natural parents; whether there is a vcrce and where it was obtained ; what responsibility and contacts the ral parents have with the children and any other important informatiow cerning them and their relationships with the children and boarding hu What activity, if any is indicated, does the county plan in working w the boarding family, the boarding children and the natural parents? 48- Revised l/lh/ . a I\ .0 '1. Hr. o. OI . . .u e a . . I . n u ... .10 C I nI . . n o I . l n v- . l! b a I . A . I . I o O. . . . . w . u. a . .01 . ~ ‘ | U u I ~ . e . e w l e u . o . , V . I . . O. . _ .. a w .a I I e l n a 0' g I I I . . . p. . .. . i . . t . . i \ ~ . . . . . I II )9 . u . . s - r . . 3.. U 0 . I i . I I \ u . . i . . .1 . u . v r . v I a D e . . . c‘t I a ’- . . I a A. I .I . u " 0 :-I u \ It I I a u n | . . . . 0 n O I . . x. I l e v e I . 0 . . I . .o I . . u v. u . t . I e ' v - OI .‘ n v I I a. n n l u I. F t I“ I ' O .I . n a l C a. l . f. n I a . ' n I ‘ o \ . It... I a . n It I I . O l . . . . . ...J A . I . I O ' " Ell. . c .u o ulo a ~ II o . . a a e .3 . I n. n ‘. I v . . o t I. . . a . I .I-q § n e o o «I . o n e a ll a»... I to . Qt - a .‘I ‘ I. I o D u I O A I’M II‘ -5- Estimate of FamiWafuences: Local references are to be interviewed; written statements should be tained from those who live in another county. Give name and addresl of those interviewed, length of time they have known the foster par: whether they spoke freely or reluctantly, and had specific informati not. Give your evaluation of references interviewed. It is advised contact other reliable individuals who know the foster parents. The county health deputment and county school commissioner can give 136: information in many counties. Clearance with physicians should be u accordance with procedures given in item 658 - Children's Division I« Mession: State your impression at this home and the foster parents' ability i work with boarding children. What are their strong points. Their x. nesses? Does the home offer the affection and understanding which e child needs? Indicate what kind of child would best fit into this I: and why? Do you think the family would benefit by frequent supervie from you? Rgcmsndatiin: State specifically the number, age and sex of children for which you recomending a license, and whether for full time or day care only. you suggest a provisional license, give precise reasons for doing sc relation to the rules and regulations. so II I. ‘ .I 'l n ' . . . I I V‘ I I .|. , .. I ‘. .. . I .. ... - . I I l .‘I ' C l. v a I .. vs ‘I I ." \ddress of Appl icant Appendix 4 a“ APPLICATICN FOR LICENSE TO CONDUCT A wARDING HOE FOR CHILDREN Rev. 10-51 (Under Act U7, PUblic Acts of Michigan, first extra session of 1944, as amended) State Department of Social Welfare Lansing 4, Michigan Date (Number. Street or RFD) (City or Village) (Zone) ‘AMILY COMPOSITION: (Give information for all members of family living in the home) BIRTH OCCUPATIOE LAST IAN! FIRST IAHE DATE RACE RELIGIOI OR SCHO kn life Ihlld xxxx xxxx g M xxxx xxxx :hlld xxxx xxxx :hlld xxxx xxxx :IIlld xxxx xxxx Ihlld xxxx xxxx MEI! MEMBERS OF HOUSEHOLD: (Relatives, Boarding Children, Boarders, Roomers, Hired help, etc. RELATI ones I P CONTR I l LAST IAHE FIRST NAME AGE RACE T0 FAMILY RECEIVE; ¥ Telephone Nunber Directions for reaching your home g; (If none. give name and number of nearest telephone and distance) —l (Include Section and Township. if in rural area) —l . . Branch of Military service of either boarding parent: lane Dates k Service._ 0flCHILDREN l2! LIVING IN THE HOME: (If deceased, give date and age at time of death) LAST IAHE FIRST IAFE ADDRESS 3“ t- If any niefibers of the household are ill or handicapped, give particulars ¥ 'DATE AND PLACE OF MARRIAGE: "If a; at husband or wife were married previously, give dates and names ¥ HOME: Ntmber of rooms Nunber of bedrooms length of time you have lived in present home Do you own, or are Maiden name of wife __—‘I you buying or renting your III-1 (Back) Describe sleeping arrangements for children and adults living in the home. Include plan for prospective boarding :hildren. fl Will you have a separate bed for each boarding child? _.L ._J_ JL—e IlHY DO YOU WISH TO BOARD CHILDREN? :1 l How many children do you wish to board? Full time or day-care only? #4, Do you wish to board boys or girls?____,_______Between what ages? Religious preference_—________fi For whom do you plan to board children? Agency'(Name).. Court (County) Directly from parent or relative (Check)_,.% Have you ever kept boarding children befme? If yes, give particulars (how many. dates, by when placed COMMUNITY: (707’ 80'0" 0f the J’OHWWE’ {WE'LCOW 1'23?” faCilities are available, their distance from the home, and means of transportation.) Grade School ’ -———’-l ________._.—d High School _____,.._———4 __ fl...—»-J| Religious education .. ___..—-—r‘. -_,__—————'/ Play and entertainment activities ________,,. REFERENCES: (Give at least 5 P3730“ not related to 3’0“; including your family physician and pastor) NAME A DDRE§§ OCCU pf“ g _—.- 1...- / -~ ‘_‘—--'-/ __.———/ _/ ___/ I If granted a boarding home license we hereby agree to c0mply with the following requirements: 1 . - r 1. We agree to notify the State Department of Seoul Welfare, within 48 hours, of each unrelated child received Initially home ‘0' C9” who has not been placed by a ”mans“! Ch‘id”P18‘?inz agency or Probate court. We also sine to'no the department. within 48 hours. after eflCh unrelated child is removed from our home. . . ‘ h- 2_ We agree to notify the State Department of Sacral Welfare irmnediately of any change in our address or changes sit in our household. . ha! 3. If the child becomes ill we agree to notify the Person or organization that p13¢ed the child with us ‘nd to see t medical attention is provided. 306W .6. c : u; I III A I!!! T 4. we agree to comply with the "RULES AIID REGULATIONS FOR BOARDING Hours For CHILDREN" as printed and issued by 1" A Michigan Social 'elfare Comission. b9"d (Signed) _______.....H"’ 'fc Agency: {Signed ) JV: Worker: Date: 7 .. 7“] _ H. .Appendix 5 sun: OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE LIWII CM. BUILDING LANSING 13 IOCIAI. WELFARE GOMM IIIION I... C. CHIMIAN. “.0" CHAIRIIAN c. II. ”MIRA". VIC! CHAIRHAN m J. MINOR DATE: I”. A. A. IAN". JR. HID. new A. PM RE: Dear Dr. The family of the applicant whose signature appears below is interested in accepting children for boarding care and is apply- ing for a boarding home license. In order for us to approve .he home for a license we would like to know about the present health of the family and whether or not additional responsibility can be assumed without being detrimental to the physical or mental health of the family and whether the child will receive adequate health care. If you think that a license should be denied, a provisional license only be granted, or that there should be limitation as to the number, age or sex of boarding children, please indicate under ”recommendations”. Very truly yours, Signature Title Address We hereby authorize Dr. to release to the State Department of Social Welfare information concerning each member of our family which will assist the Department in considering our application to board children in our home. Signed: Signed: Date: a ("h DU 1 v/fifi {D.nvr-T (“n/q ‘1 _1)l_’l0\ ;€TC iIOI 31m Appendix 6 (BBB-16 atober l. 194 7 PHYSICAL EXAMINATION BLANK FOR BOARDING HOME APPLICANTS Name: Address: History of communicable disease in household: Tuberculosis venereal disease_____typhoid____recent diarrhea other a Remarks: # Snellpox vaccination. Date: Schick test: Date: a :hest X-ray: Date: 9hys ical examinat ion: Special physical findings noted, indicating presence of disabling defects of communicable disea Laboratory findings if indicated: Kahn Nose and throat cultures Stool culture ____. I Other —_—, —I ‘_4 This is to certify that I have made a physical examination of this applicant sufficient to determine or absence of the diseases mentioned above. In my opinion the physical or mental health of this app] that it will not adversely affect the care of foster children, except as my be herein indicated. Recon'mendat ions: l __ F— Signed: , ' Date: (Please return this form in the enclosed envelope.) ”If yam Wm a typewritten copy for your files. check here Danni one will be nailed to you. 1‘ ’ :Appendixz7' ("In .trsk N—LCEu (5‘ Um UQDGB Q>w1L¢L Ca Em UHMfiU QLU uwfiu Mm HCUEUMthhm VLWCQ Ufiu Mm ##03 XUOLU .paazo 0;» you mamuao no» hon has o>mooou cu yo: man so» was» mm uCoEowcouum vuaon ocu um boom xooLU .vHMLU ofiu uom Mcmumo com hon o>mooou Ga :0» qu mm ucoEowcwuum vumoa ozu um omen xoofinu "aucoeoacuec< uc_ucaom .xooB hon mu£m«c whoa so use ecu uoLuoLB uLMMCuo>o 080: wcmpueon ecu Cw mm p~m£o a um ouuU osmuwwmam xoosu .hfico oEmumnp ecu wcwusp 080: wcmtuaon ecu :m a“ vgwno a ma MMMMHNmm.xoo£nu "once we maxH .080: mcfipuwon uo£uo:m cm Coon mm; vfiflfio ozu uo: uo uofiuoLB ou no uoBmca CBOCJCD no .02 .mO? a o>MO "use: uc_vceom c. »_o=o_>oca “Bo—on co>mm one LUMLS wcomuosuumCM Umwmooow poo: use Bow a ~39 huOuoCmfioxo.u~om mun one: .mc0mumozo ado nuance omeo~m .ucosoumsoou was» Ou thawed :M .touvfimzu no» moEo: wcmvuaom: Hodcasan 0:» cm o¢ was me momzm cu wouuowou one 30> .pfiwno mamvumon Loco qu one: on cu mm :oMLB comuaEuOHCM uncomuficpo how moomdo can owed ouMLB many do Joan as» :0 .pfifiso mumpueon Loco how new: ou one so» JUMLB puooou oz» uo undo no uofixoon choomm 9:0: wcmtueom 0:» cmlwwcmau III .3 on 0u ma was 95 was 0:0 mcowuoom mo maoo conuwo s m“ C300 vixov owoo cums? och. “mag. WW5: .Uo>9=ou ma U~«£o u beams musoz flfi.c«£um3 noxuok QED: mampuaonvnucaou ”w a Cu «com.flaum:E comuoom mac» «0 mommmo Bo-o>.vco compo ofih .ounv wound a as Cusuou was uWuo My oumcmwop 0: mm ouosu was «so; ago mo>no~ o; cons Mao: mcdpueOQ osu Scum po>ofiou pouotmmwo “o_komm an cameo < .eso; use» sou. em>o2mu as usage a cue; evacuasoo on some. cameo». more .ogemcso; .vo>mooou mm pfiano a gnome oom mace mo MMMNmm.BoH~o> was ll: . ammo 3:3; ”0E0: ummfiu flfl cdzuma uoxuoa 050: wcqvumon hucsoo woo» on «com on umDE cow» mask flu . m com 0:5 .oEOL each oucm vo>mooou mm v—m£o a cw£3 kuoaaeoo on afiscm comuoo . max“. 00 up soon vuooou . cm vdmzo zone new mucouaa wcmpuwon oLu xfi wouodoeoo on cu mun LUMLB mecca news»: a : memzH emdmoom meB z~ mzmom mma czHHmAmsoo mom monBOD '.. .{ )Q-‘.-"—“'l*‘ --b—‘-‘ iL‘l-"i. i- .". .i Appendix 8 mk NEOI wz.om >ocm even so .o flouoo_z sm¢_u mzum amouum use: ax.n¢b |.>n— an“ cu:c:uc (.1 wk(o mZOIa nah-irmc c llcnfisé éw+lrxl~ (Wrn* r#r\5r‘ir\t\ «ItchHQK— mmmEDz wamU_4 MZOI 02—Om « mzox oz.oaoeom n—.;o no: me: OJ_IU OP zommma m_IP no m_Imzo_k<4mm uzoxm zomamm m.:p so mmumoo< l a<_».z_ pmm_u mzoeo¢ cu oe_acocc< cocoa mzszo: 050: e. no: u__eu 05—h mo cameo; :pzo: m >40 no>oeom we; u__:o ouao mzoza muxpoz do mmumoo< a<_».z_ me_u u2 >um \uewtm mmcoamc _ m.xm smegma uxo: o¢_o¢