ORIGIN OF THE LATE-PALEOZOIC PLUTONIC MASSIFS OF MOROCCO M. S. MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY ELLA RUTH TEWS WILLIAMS 1975 mi . ...'.., .- I u LIE“ 2‘ 7! a...“ A . K .. . . 7 u... a S . . “at. w .c.) u . ”.7 wt. . ..A_ .c . ‘$ t .r .- .. 0.1. n. g 5., m. m L v I was ”‘hhHm -____.__ .l . Lilrilil .H. .F! 2...: . “$31.54. 5.5.... ...rphn....u«Harfiirhflhfiicflm........... .Fknf. H31. _ .l .l:Ia ABSTRACT ORIGIN OF THE LATE-PALEOZOIC PLUTONIC MASSIFS OF MOROCCO BY ELLA RUTH TENS WILLIAMS Throughout northwestern Africa are small (less than 200 sq. km.) late-Paleozoic massifs. These are shallowly emplaced into unmetamor- phosed Paleozoic sediments and always produce a well defined contact metamorphic aureole. The Tichka Massif is the only well exposed massif with over 2000 meters of vertical relief developed. In contrast, the other massifs have barely been unroofed. The Tichka massif contains basic rocks surrounding tear-drop shaped granitic pods. At the contact of the massif with the overlying sediments large masses of granite occur. Lithologic and geochemical data (Vogel and Walker, l975; Preston §t_al,, in preparation) show that the granite and basic magmas coexisted and have independent origins. Preston gt_gl. (in preparation) suggest that the basic rocks are mantle derived melts and that the granites are crustal derived melts. Compositionally the granitic massifs fall near the univariant liquidous line in the Ab, An, 0r system and this suggests that these rocks originate by fractional fusion of crustal rocks. Those massifs which are associated with relatively large negative gravity anomalies (-40 mgals) are nearly identical in composition and are statistically different from those that are not associated with negative gravity anomalies. There is no evidence to support a subduction zone model for the origin for these late-Paleozoic massifs. It is proposed that the massifs are a response of the continental crust to initial spreading and rifting of North America from Africa. On the basis of the ages of these massifs the age of the initial activity would be about 320 m.y.b.p. ORIGIN OF THE LATE-PALEOZOIC PLUTONIC MASSIFS OF MOROCCO By Ella Ruth Tews Williams A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Geology 1975 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank all those who contributed to the ideas and discussions in this paper, and to thank Dr. H. Stonehouse, Dr. W. Cambray, Dr. T. Vogel, and Dr. C. Cress for reading the manuscript. Special thanks go to John Preston, Dane Williams, and Bruce Walker for help in sample preparation and support. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ............... . . .......... l Tichka . . . . . . ....................... 4 Other Moroccan Massifs . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ 12 Discussion ........................ . . . . 18 Conclusions . . ......................... 23 References Cited ......................... 26 Appendix. . . . . . . ...................... 29 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Chemical Analyses (Weight Percent) of the Granite Margins and Pods ................. l0 Table II. Modal Analysis (Percent) of Granite Pods and Margins ....................... ll Table III. Comparison of Variables of Granite Margins and Pods ......................... 16 Table IV. Modal Analyses of Moroccan Massifs ............ 30 Table V. Chemical Analyses of Moroccan Massifs ........... 3l iv LIST OF FIGURES Figure l. Hercynian Massifs of Morocco .............. 6 Figure 2. Modal Analysis (Quartz, K-feldspar, Plagioclase) of Moroccan Granites .................. 9 Figure 3. Anorthite-Albite-Orthoclase CIPW Normative Analysis for Moroccan Granites ............. 15 Figure 4. Quartz-Orthoclase-Plagioclase CIPW Normative Analysis for Moroccan Granites ............. 2l INTRODUCTION The late-Paleozoic (Hercynian) granitic massifs that occur in Morocco are typical of those that occur throughout Northwest Africa. These massifs are usually less than 200 square kilometers, shallowly emplaced into unmetamorphosed Paleozoic sediments, and have contact metamorphic aureoles surrounding them (Termier, 1936; Morin, 1951; Vandenven, 1969). The Tichka Massif (Vogel and Walker, 1975) is the only well exposed Hercynian massif in Morocco with 2000 meters of vertical relief (Figure l). In contrast, the other Hercynian massifs in Morocco have only been barely unroofed and the outcrops are relatively poor, with a maximum relief of about 200 meters. The lithologic relationships within Tichka have been studied by Vogel and Walker (1975). The Tichka Massif contains dioritic rocks surrounding granitic tear-shaped pods. The massif is capped with granites with abundant aplites and pegmatites. Vogel and Walker (1975) presented a model for the emplacement of Tichka Massif and their study provided evidence that viscous granitic pods moved upward, surrounded by an envelope of heterogeneous assemblage of dioritic rocks. Near the roof of the massif larger masses of granite coalesced, whereas the granitic pods ceased to rise when the dioritic magma crystallized, freezing the shapes of the granitic pods. The field evidence of the Tichka Massif indicates the coexistence of the granitic magmas with the mafic magmas. 2 Work done by Preston §t_al, (in preparation) based on detailed major element geochemistry in the Tichka Massif has rejected the pos— sibility that the pods differentiated from the surrounding dioritic material. He proposed that the Tichka Massif resulted from emplacement of mantle derived gabbroic material into the base of the crust which produced the granitic melts. The mantle material is represented by the gabbros and mafic diorites found in close relationship with the granitic pods. Granite coalesced at the margins of the massif resulting in an envelope of granite occurring at the contact of the massif and meta- sediments. The evolution of a hydrous fluid phase from the granitic and dioritic magmas produced aplites, pegmatites, quartz veining, muscovite, cavities, and alteration products. The margins were subjected to stress during crystallization and post crystallization as indicated by the granular textures of the rocks. The margins of the other Hercynian massifs in Morocco (Zaer, Oulmes, Aguelmous, and Midelt; Figure 1) appear to be lithologically similar to the margins of Tichka and are also composed of granites with abundant aplite and pegmatites (the two massifs north of Marrakech were not studied). The purpose of this study is to use Tichka as a model for the origin of the other, less well exposed massifs in Morocco. The chemical variation of these massifs can be evaluated by Presnall and Bateman's (1973) work on equilibrium and fractional fusion. They showed that repeated penetration of continental crust by mantle derived magmas would unavoidably produce fusion of the lower crust. In their evaluation of the chemical variation of the Sierra Nevada Batholith they concluded that equilibrium fusion was a viable model for the generation of these 3 rocks. In Northwestern Africa there is little evidence of repeated penetration of the continental crust by andesitic or basaltic magmas and therefore, heat fOr equilibrium fusion was insufficient. However, fractional fusion of the crust, producing true granitic liquids, nay have occurred. Using Presnall and Bateman's (1973) arguments, fusion models for these massifs can be evaluated. The gravity data (Van den Bosch, 1971) can also serve as a guide in comparing the massifs of Morocco. Most of the massifs of Morocco have relatively large gravity negative anomalies (approximately 40 mgal) associated with them (Figure 1). 0f the massifs studied, the Midelt and Tichka massifs do not have negative gravity anomalies. There is only one gravity station near the Tichka Massif and gravity determinations in the High Atlas areas are difficult due to their great relief. However, based on the rock types exposed within Tichka, no negative gravity anonaly would be expected. The Tichka Massif contains large amounts of relatively basic and intermediate rocks with abundant granite present only near the roof of the massif. Therefbre, in terms of gravity, one would expect that the gravity over the Tichka Massif should be similar to Midelt. The gravity data suggests that those massifs with the large negative gravity anomalies have no basic rocks associated with them. In terms of the Tichka model these can be interpreted as a complete separation of the granitic magma from the basic magma and that the basic rocks are present, but are at a lower level in the crust. The Midelt Massif should be similar to the Tichka Massif but erosion has not cut through the granitic cap. TICHKA The Tichka Massif, located in the southwestern High Atlas Mountains (Figure l), exposes a series of leucocratic granitic— biotitic, quartz monzonite tear-shaped pods surrounded by rocks ranging in composition from gabbros to granodiorites (Vogel and Walker, 1975). The more mafic dioritic rocks are thought to be the product of differentiation from a mafic mantle magma (Preston gt 31., in preparation). The mafic diorite is uniquely characterized by numerous veins of quartz-albite stringers which suggest the mafic diorite was saturated with water. Foliation of the diorite is consistently parallel to the granitic pods which indicates that most of the deformation occurred by flowage within the diorite. The pod shape of the granites indicates their diapiric movement upward. Contact relationships indicate the overlapping crystallization histories and coexistence of the granitic and dioritic magma. Aplites and pegmatites are abundant in the marginal pods, but decrease in frequency approaching the center of the massif. The margins of the Tichka Massif are charac- terized by large masses of granites with abundant aplitic and pegmatitic dikes. Where stoping of the overlying sediments has occurred there is an increase of biotite and aplites in the granites. The Tichka Massif is surrounded by metasandstones and carbonates. Texturally there is only minor difference between the Tichka margins and the Tichka pods. The Tichka pods have undergone less stress and therefore the degree of sericitization, granulation, and 4 Figure l Generalized geologic map of the southern two-thirds of Morocco showing the location of the Hercynian massifs. The massifs studied in detail are numbered: 1. Zaer, 2. Oulmes, 3. Aquelmous, 5. Midelt, and 8. Tichka (and inset). Those massifs which are associated with negative gravity anomalies are massifs numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 7. (Oczomr zooxm «SPMONOE Immoz 03>z_._.m >20 >cmm0rmm vamo>£mafiz Immoz memfim 0m 2.030000 .3. o mo who no 1 7 suturing appear to be much less. Within the margins of the massif the xenomorphic-granular aplitic material is typified by an abundance of granophyric growths and alteration of plagioclase and biotite to seri- cite and chlorite. The marginal quartz monzonites and porphyritic granites commonly display a distinct orientation of the mafic minerals and occasionally of the quartz. Intersertal quartz often is feund surrounding grains or clusters of grains. Boundaries are highly sutured and there is an abundance of poikiolitic and granophyric textures common to all rock types of the margins of the massif. Stress features f0und in the marginal granites are thought to be the product of pressure exerted by the rising of the underlying magma. Hydrous fluids which passed through the margins caused alteration products to form. The marginal rocks and pods of the massif are clearly composed of granites and a few quartz monzonites, leuco-quartz-diorites, and granodiorites (Figure 2). Chemical comparison of the Tichka pods with the Tichka margins indicates a significant decrease of CaO, Ti02, Fe203, and an increase in SiO2 in the margins (Table 1). Differences are also shown by variable amounts of albite, anorthite, and K-feldspar (Table II). The differences found between the pods and margins may be due to alteration by hydrothermal solutions or assimilation of country rock. The pods and margins have no significant differences in Rb and K/Rb values which support the hypothesis that they are from a common parental material. Figure 2 Modal analyses of Moroccan massifs. In all figures only the granitic margins and pods are included for the Tichka Massif. a»: moon. 43.10:. a mZ_0m<<‘ (v.10: .. Sun—.2 o m30¢<$30< o meHDO o ¢woumaz thHon m0 040<0 om mm.o —w.o 00.0 om._ m—.o no.0 om.m om.o 00.0 om.o 0m.o oo.o oo.o mm.o Fm.~ mpHmOAIU oo.o oo.o oo.o oo.o oo.o oo.o oo.o oo.o oo.o Np.o mm.o oo.o m0.o o¢.o 00.0 th>oomsz No.o ©0.N Pw.¢ 00.0 0—._ mN.N 00.0 op.m 00.0 om.m w0.m 00.0 om.o mm.mp oo.o mHHHon m_.m NN.om om.wm oo.om mm.m0 00.0m 00.00 00.00 om.mm mm.o mm.o¢ w0.m0 0N.mv mm.mm NF.PN mH mpnmh m¢.~ mm.mp mm.mp w0.0N mm.m~ ¢¢.mm 0m.w mm.F~ mm.m_ mm.m N0.mp mm.00 Pm.mp om.op mo.v~ mHHm4< d) F-F-r—r-I-Tr—F- (‘6 OJ NNNNNNNZ In I NNNNNNN C I N!— mo I—r—mI—ITNQ' II .0: 000500 0:0m002 mxguwh .0: 000500 00000: FF mm 0N.0 m0.0 NN.0 00.0 No.0 00.0 —_.0 Nm.0 n m 00 mmw 0m.m 00.0 en.0 mn.mp 00.0 mN.Nm mm.0 Nm.¢ n.x m": —0 0N0 0N.m 00.0 PN.P 0N.NF ¢~.0 00.0m 0F.P mm.¢ w~10N1N em 0Nm mF.N 00.0 mN.0 mm.mp 00.0 0¢.nu F0.0 0m.m M10N1N 00 0F¢ 0¢.N NN.0 0N.0 mN.NF 00.0 mm.u0 No.0 P0.m N10N1N mpp mom mw.m 00.0 mo.~ mm.m~ 00.0 mm.Pm me. 0~.¢ d—10N1N oer Pmm 0N.m mm.0 pm.p 0F.0P F0.0 00.mm 05.0 mw.m N10N1m mm 00¢ 0m.F mm.0 00.0 F¢.¢F 00.0 PN.NN 0N.0 0N.¢ F1NN1N .0: 00 00m mm.m 00.0 ~0.P F¢.m— m0.0 mm.00 p¢.0 NN.m N1NN1N mFQEmm 00 00¢ 0N.¢ 00.0 0N.0 Nw.m~ 00.0 0m.~n Pm.0 mm.m m1m~1~ mmepzo FF mw Fm.0 00.0 0N.0 nm.0 No.0 mm.~ 0F.0 0m.0 n m «FF 00m 0¢.m —~.0 0n.0 00.0— 00.0 mm.Nm 00.0 00.0 n.“ an: em— Rpm mm.m 00.0 0m.0 00.NP V0.0 00.05 00.0 mm.¢ P1mN1m mm 000 mm.N 00.0 0m.0 mw.mp m~.0 00.0N m¢.0 N_.0 NP1¢N1N va emu 1111 1111 m0.0 0N.N— 00.0 mm.mn 00.0 mw.¢ m1mm1u m—P 0mm 05.0 00. 00.0 mm.Pp 00.0 mm.wm m¢.0 0~.N mp1mm1m Fmp 00m Nm.m 00.0 0N.N 00.¢~ NP.0 Fm.m0 #0.N N0.m PF1mN1N mop mam mm.p 00.0 00.0 00.0F 00.0 0P.NN ~0.0 em. 0P1¢N1m MPF vmm mm.N mm.0 mm.0 0¢.mp 00.0 00.~m Fm.0 mm.m m1¢N1N .o: 00 0N0 mN.m 00.0 0n.0 0¢.¢P 00.0 m¢.0n PN.0 00.m Flmm1n mFQEmm mm Pmm 00.N 00.0 00.0 Fe.mp 00.0 00.00 No.0 00.0 010N1~ LmMN m m 0000 00 0002 002 00000 0 0 00 0000 000 000 000 0000002 amouogoz 00 0000000< 00002000 > 000<0 mm 000 omp wow 00— 0mm Fmp mm on nm\¥ mm omm mFN mmm «am New 00m vmp mvm pm? 00 mmm mmm 00w Pom Nmm pop mom owe mmm am mm.o m0.m mm.m om.0 0m.m 00.0 om.¢ oo.m m¢.m mN.m 0N.o 0m.m mm.N on.m m0.m 0N.N o—.0 mp.m 0002 0N.o mm.o 00.0 mm. 00.0 oo.o 00.0 00.0 mo.o mm.o NF.o 00.0 00.0 00.0 mm.o 00.0 00.0 00.0 002 00.0 po.m m0. m~.¢ 00.0 mo.P 00.0 mm.~ Fm.o FN.¢ 0N.o 00.0 00.0 mm.o mm.o 00.0 mm.m mo.~ om.o mm.0 00000 00.0 mp.mp 00.00 om.mp mm._P m0.w m¢.w m¢.mp mm.m0 om.mp mm.o 0N.NP mm.PF 00.0— oo.Np om.FP om.mp om.00 ow.mp mm.NF 00000 F03 NO OOOOOOOO CO NOOMOMLOM LDONOI—OKDF- LON CO mo.m 0m.00 00.00 mm.mm Fm.m0 mo.00 Pm.m0 m0.00 00.00 mm.¢m 00.0 oo.m0 00.00 00.00 Fo.m0 mm.00 om.mm mm.wm om.¢0 mo.00 0000 000000200 .> 00000 0m.o mm._ mp.m mm.m 00.0 m0.o 00.0 00.0 mm. om.m m0.o 00.0 00.0 _¢.o mo.o mm.o mm.o mm.o 00. 00.0 000 00.0 mm.¢ mo.m 00.0 oo.m mm.¢ mm.m mm.m 0N.m 00.0 000 |'> 00000 101.0 VKOLOIDVLOLO ON r-OOOOOO OO OFONF-LDOr- 000 0.00 Fm.m m0.m Fm.m o¢.m m0. oe.m om.v 00.0 n 0 n.x 0 u : 00-00-0 00100-0 o0-00-0 00-00-0 .0: 0100-0 000500 0-00-0 000m00: 0-00-0 00:00» 1| '1'! 1| III |I|I| 1| I'll 1 1111111 99