— *“33- 9*. w. d-—...“. -.—o——.- ¢ PHYSICAL ABILITY TESTING OF MALE STUDENTS IN GRADES FOUR THROUGH TWELVE Thesis for the Degree of M. A. MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY David L. 805 1966 ‘u m5 THES'S i LIBRARY T‘ ‘ '3 ‘Iaigan SD.‘ M III3I; SII IIILI. IEIIII ABSTRACT PHYSICAL ABILITY TESTING OF MALE STUDENTS IN GRADES FOUR THROUGH TWELVE by David L. Bos Statement of the Problem: Research indicates a lack of data on the physical abil— ity levels in the intermediate grades. This study was an at- tempt to establish a set of norms for use in the Unity Chris- tian School System. Why the Problem was Selected: This study is intended to be an aid or guide to the physical education department of Hudsonville Unity Christian School System in determining some of the goals or objectives for the total physical education program. This study will also make available more physical abil- ity tests scored according to the percentile rank. Methodology: The information was obtained by giving each boy in the Unity Christian School System, in grades four through twelve, a battery of physical ability tests. The testing involved five schools. The data were key-punched in IBM cards and these cards were processed to set up percentile tables. David L. Bos Percentile tables were developed by ages and grade levels for male students in grades four through twelve. Tables were developed for selected measures of strength, power, cardiovascular, muscular endurance, agility, flexi- bility, and body composition. PHYSICAL ABILITY TESTING OF MALE STUDENTS IN GRADES FOUR THROUGH TWELVE By David L. Bos A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Department of Health, Physical Education, and Recreation 1966' ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer wishes to express his apwreciation to the many people who have helped with this study. To Dr. Wayne D. Van Huss, his advisor, the writer is indebted for his valuable suggestions and help. The writer is grateful to Mr. Lloyd Tinholt, physical education teacher in Jenison Christian Junior High, for help in testing his pupils and to the six senior boys who helped administer the tests. To the principals in the Hudsonville Schools, Mr. William H. Vander Vliet and Mr. Edward Wezeman, and to the Jenison School principals, Mr. Peter Bouma and Mr. Paul Witte, for their help and cooperation, the writer is appreciative. He is also grateful to his wife, Nancy, who offered words of encouragement and inspiration when they were needed most. CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION. II. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE The Definitions of Terms Used Statement of the problem Problem TABLE OF CONTENTS Importance of the study . Limitations III. METHODOLOGY IV. SUMMARY BIBLIOGRAPHY . APPENDIX ONUT ER) 13 15 l6 TABLES II. III. IV. VI. VII. VIII. IX. XI. XII. XIII. XIV. XV. XVI. XVII. XVIII. XIX. XI. XXI. XXII. XXIII. LIST OF TABLES Strength Norms by Age Levels Strength Norms by Grade Levels . . . . Agility Norms by Age Levels . Agility Norms by Grade Levels Standing Broad Jump Norms by Age Levels Standing Broad Jump Norms by Grade Levels Softball Throw Norms by Age Levels . . . . Softball Throw Norms by Grade Levels . . . Flexibility Norms by Age Levels . . . . . Flexibility Norms by Grade Levels . Cardio—Pulmonary Norms by Age Levels Cardio-Pulmonary Norms by Grade Levels . . Height Norms by Age Levels Height Norms by Grade Levels Weight Norms by Age Levels Weight Norms by Grade Levels Arm Skinfold Norms by Age Levels Arm Skinfold Norms by Grade Levels Subscapular Skinfold Norms by Age Levels Subscapular Skinfold Norms by Grade Levels Hip Skinfold Norms by Age Levels Hip Skinfold Norms by Grade Levels Abdominal Swinfold Norms by Age Levels PAGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ‘ 26 27 28 29 3o 31 32 33 3A 35 36 37 38 39 TABLES XXIV. xxv. XXVI. XXVII. XXVIII. XXIX. xxx. XXXI. XXXII. XXXIII. XXXIV. Abdominal Skinfold Norms by Grade Levels Thigh Skinfold Norms by Age Levels Thigh Skinfold Norms by Grade Levels Total Skinfold Norms by Age Levels . . Total Skinfold Norms by Grade Levels 600 Yard Run—Walk Norms by Age Levels EGG Yard Run-Walk Norms by Grade Levels Pull Up Norms by Age Levels Pull Up Norms by Grade Levels . . . . . Push Up Norms by Age Levels . . . . . . Push Up Norms by Grade Levels . . . . . \47 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURES PAGE 1. Sample Test Card . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 2. Agility Test Diagram . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION There is a need for increasing the continuity or pro- gression in the physical education in program in the Unity Christian School System. The major factors are the lack of time for complete evaluation and those that are geographical in nature. The physical education staff desires to improve articulation between the grades and Junior and senior high schools. This study of physical ability testing was under- taken principally for this reason. I. THE PROBLEM Statement of the problem. It was the purpose of the study to set up physical ability norms for all male students in the Unity Christian School System. Students participate in physical education classes at the high school each day of the week. This provides enough time for a rather complete measurement of physical ability levels for diagnosis and guidance of the students. However, in grades four through nine, physical educa- tion classes are offered only once a week. This is inade- quate and instructors do not have enough time for complete evaluation of the physical ability levels. Attempts have been made to locate data on physical ability levels, but there is not very much available in per- centile ranking, particularly in the intermediate grade level. Importance of the study. Physical education can make a unique contribution to the total development of the child. Education, as well as physical education, involves activity and development. Physical education is concerned with the development of the organic systems, with the development of the neuro-muscular system, and the skills which are acquired as the result of such development. The educational scheme of Unity Christian High School is set upon these foundations. Thus, the physical educators should know to what extent this deveIOpment is taking place, and to what extent the child is progressing from month to month and from year to year. In order to measure this development, the physical education department of Unity Christian High School adminis- ters physical fitness tests three times each school year. The first tests are given at the start of the school term in order to classify the individual students. These tests in- dicate in which areas of physical ability each student ex— cells or is weak. These tests serve as a means of classi- fication, but also as a means of diagnosis and guidance. The second battery of tests (the three batteries of tests are identical) is given at the end of the first semester of school. The scores of the second tests serve as a means of appraisal of pupil progress, pupil iniative, and teacher efficiency. The third series of tests are taken at the end of the school year, which is at the end of the second semester. These scores are used to evaluate pupil progress over the entire year. The test results reflect the efficiency of the instructor, his methods, and the curricular offering. However, up to now, very little testing has been done in the junior high or intermediate grades. Physical educa— tion classes are offered only one class period per week and this is inadequate for complete testing. The junior high and elementary schools in the school system are completely separate from the high school. They are controlled by different administration and separate school boards. The high school administration and board recognizes the importance of physical education and it is properly placed in the curriculum. This markedly hampers articulation between the schools in setting up a physical education program. It has also hampered this study to a degree. It is hoped that this study will help coordinate the program and that the school boards and administrations of the junior highs and elemen— tary schools will be favorably influenced to stress physical education more in the future. It is also hoped that the study will provide more con— crete data as to what a child can be expected to do physically at the various age levels, and by doing this, that physical education in general will benefit from this study. II. DEFINITIONS OF TERMS USED Measurement. Determination of the ability of the stu- dent in various aspects of physical ability. Evaluation. Determination of how the objectives are reached. Physical ability tests (fitness tests and test battery) Technique of measurement and evaluation used to gain infor- mation about the individual. COpies of the test given at Unity Christian High and of the test used in this study can be located in the appendix. Classification. Arrangement of individuals into homo- geneous groups. Characteristic. Distinguishing feature of the individ— ual. Diagnosis. Analysis of the primary components under- lying characteristics. Rating. A judgment estimate of the testee with re- spect to the characteristic or ability under consideration. Achievement. Accomplishment of the individual be- 1 yond a definite starting point. lL. Larson and R. D. Yocum, Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education, Health, and Recreation (St. Louis: C. V. Mosby Company, 1954), pp. 20-21. III. LIMITATIONS The tests were given to all males in grades four through twelve. The twelfth grade does not have required physical education so it was impossible to test all the seniors. Therefore, the senior results are not too conclu- sive. In grades four through eleven, the test battery was given to all the boys with but a few exceptions. Those with heart conditions or asthma did not take the endurance tests, and a few boys with broken bones, etc., could not take part. A few of the tests had to be given outdoors. The weather conditions varied during the course of the testing and this may have been a factor in the results. CHAPTER II REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE This review is limited to physical ability testing results that have been made up into percentiles. Percentile tables are more practical because they can be readily under- stood by parents and students. One of the latest studies was completed by Fleishman. More than 20,000 boys and girls in 45 cities throughout the country were tested.2 The age range was 14 through 18, al- though norms were developed down through age 12 for some tests. He attempted to measure the following factor areas: strength, flexibility——speed, balance, coordination, and endurance. The norms for the vaious tests, in percentile form from Fleishman's Examiner's Manual.3 The American Association for Health, Physical Educa— tion, and Recreation also has constructed percentile tables for the National Fitness Test Program. These norms are available for both boys and girls from the ages ten through eighteen. Ththests themselves, however, are not complete as they do not test all the factors involved in physical fitness or ability. 2E. A. Fleishman, The Structure and Measurement of Physical Fitness (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice- Hall, Inc., 196?), p. 3. 3E. A. Fleishman, Examiner's Manual for the Basic Fitness Tests éEnglewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice- Hall, Inc., 19 A). Johnson measured selected fundamental skills in child- ren in grades 1—6. The skills tested were throwing, catch— ing, kicking, batting, jumping, and running.“ Percentile tables were prepared for these tests. These are not tests of physical ability, but rather skill tests. However, some of these might be used for basic fitness tests. These are about the extent of the norms that are readily available for the average physical education teacher Many schools, however, have compiled their own norms for their fitness tests. There is a wealth of material on testing and measure- ment. Many studies have been done on certain areas of phys— ical ability testing, such as strength. Some of these stud- ies have analyzed data to determine the means and standard deviation, but very few percentile tables have been calcu- lated. 3R. D. Johnson, ”Measurement of Achievement in Funda- mental Skills of Elementary School Children,” Research Quarterly, 33:94, 1962. \] CHAPTER III METHODOLOGY The test battery which follows was given to the male students in Unity Christian High School located in Hudson— ville, Michigan; to junior high and elementary male students in thelfiidsonvilleeChristian Schools; and to junior high and elementary male students of the Jenison Christian Schools located in the neighboring community of Jenison, Michigan. This involved two schools in Hudsonville: Unity Christian High and Hudsonville Christian, and three schools in Jenison: Jenison Christian Junior High and two Jenison Christian Ele- mentary Schools. Each student took the same tests. The tests were ad— ministered by the writer, who is the Physical Education Di- rector of Unity Christian High, and six responsible senior boys who received special training in the testing techniques. Lloyd Tinholt, physical education instructor in the Jenison Christian Junior High, assisted with the testing in Jenison Christian Junior High. The testing took place from October, 1965 until the end of April, 1966. Each student was given a printed test card and his scores were recorded by the testors on these cards. The students had possession of these cards only during the time of the actual testing. Raw scores were recorded on the righthand side of the test card. The final score was placed in columns provided on the lefthand side of the card to facilitate key—punching cards for later use in a card sort- ing machine. A sample of the test card design can be found in the appendix. A number was assigned to each student to simplify key- punching the data cards. The date of birth was recorded by month and year. Thus, January, 1949 became 0149, and December, 1954 became 1254. The test battery was as follows: 1. Strength test—-hand grip test 2. Agility test 3. Power tests a. Standing broad jump b. Softball throw 4. Flexibility test--hip-trunk flexion test 5. Cardio-pulmonary test--three minute step test 6. Anthropometric measurements a. Height b. Weight c. Skinfold (fat) measurements 1) Posterior upper arm ) Subscapular ) Hip ) Abdomen ) Front thigh 7. Muscular endurance a. 600 yard run—walk 10 b. Pull ups (overhand grip) 0. Push ups 711 boys were tested in grades four through twelve. The following lists show the number of cases in each age and grade level: GRADE CASES AGE CASES 12 39 18 A2 11 77 17 77 10 77 lb 79 9 69 15 74 8 86 14 85 7 89 13 91 6 90 12 9o 5 97 11 93 A 87 1o 76 The strength tests were given on a Narragansett Hand Dynamometer. The test was administered as described by Fleishman.5 The agility test Began with the student lying flat on his stomach with his hands outstretched. The raw scores were recorded to the tenth of a second. Each student re- ceived two trials and the average score was recorded. A di- agram of this test may be found in the appendix. Two tests were administered to measure power. The standing broad jump was measured in centimeters to facili— tate key-punching the data cards. C: JE. A. Fleishman. Examiner's Manual for the Basic Fitness Tests (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice- Hall, Inc., 1964), p. 38. 11 The second power tests was the softball throw. It was administered as described by Fleishman. 'The flexibility test was a hip-trunk flexion test given from a seated position. The zero reading was ten centimeters. This was done to eleminate negative numbers. The cardio—pulmonary test was a three minute step test. The rate was thirty times per minute. A pulse rate was taken and recorded from one minute to one and one half min- utes after the exercise. Height was measured twice in stocking feet. The aver- age height was recorded in centimeters. One weight measurement was taken and recorded in pounds. The boys were clad in shorts and socks and every— one was weighed on the same scale. Fat measurement were taken using a Lange skin-fold cal- iper.* Two measurements were taken on each position and the average was recorded in millimeters. The five areas measured were: Back of the upper arm Subscapular Hip, just above the crest of the ileum 4:me Abdominal, approximately two inches to the side of the naval. U1 Front thigh. *Constructed by Wenner—Gren Aeronautical Laboratory, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky. 12 The averages of these readings were added up to obtain a total fat measurement for each student. Muscular endurance was measured by three tests. The tests used were the 600 yard run—walk, pull ups using the overhand grip, and push ups. The test battery was selected to measure the following areas: 1. Strength 2. Agility Power Flexibility Cardio—pulmonary endurance Muscular endurance Nam-EU) Anthropometric measurements to determine how body build affected performance. CHAPTER IV SUMMARY It is impossible to analyze the data received from this testing program without Other test results. Future testing will be done in the Hudsonville Unity Christian School System to be used for the diagnosis and guidance of the students and the program. This study is the starting point for the Hudsonville Unity Christian School System in its overall evaluation of physical education. The tables found in the appendix are the total results of the study. The sample consisted of all available students in the school system. In evaluating the testing procedure, most of the tests were easily administered. The clerical work involved in re- cording and averaging scores and also running the keypunched cards through the card sorter was very time consuming. The most difficult test to administer was the push up test for muscular endurance. It was too easy for the students to ”cheat" on this test. Each one had to be watched very closely to see that he followed instructions perfectly. The other tests were easily administered. The current data can be used as pilot information for use in developing more comprehensive standards. The current information will also serve as the initial data in develop— ing more reliable tables. 11; These tables, however, can be used for future classes in developing profile information. Although the samples were not large, the fact that they included all available subjects adds to the value of the standards for further use in the Hudsonville School System. The tables will also be of some value for use in other school systems until further stand- ards can be developed. BIBLIOGRAPHY Campbell, W. G. Form and Style in Thesis Writing. Boston: Hougton Mifflin Company, 1954. Fleishman, E. A. Examiner's Manual for the Basic Fitness Tests. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc., 1964. . The Structure and Measurement of Physical Fitness. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice—Hall Inc., 1964. Johnson, R. D. "Measurement of Achievement in Fundamental Skills of Elementary School Children,” Research Quar- terly, AAHPER, Vol. 33, No. 1 (March, 19627. Larson, L. and R. D. Yocum. Measurement and Evaluation in Physical, Health, and Recreational Education. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby Company, 1951. Piscopo, J. ”Skinfold and Other Anthropometrical Measurements of Pre-Adolescent Boys from Three Ethnic Groups," 337 search Quarterly, AAHPER, Vol. 33 (1962). PreSident's Council on Youth Fitness.‘ YOuth FitneSs TeSt Manual. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office, July, 1965. APPENDIX TABLE 1 STRENGTH 6 LE, Age Levels Ii§ 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 100 60.0 78.0 71.0 80.0 105.5 128.5 141.0 183.0 144.5 90 51.0 59.0 65.0 73.0 80.5 97.5 124.0 134.0 139.0 80 49.0 53.0 60.0 69.0 75.0 90.5 113.0 124.0 134.0 70 46.0 50.5 56.5 63.5 70.0 87.0 107.0 119.5 127.0 60 44.0 50.0 54.0 59.0 68.0 82.0 102.0 114.0 123.0 50 43.0 47.5 53.0 57.5 65.0 76.0 95.0 110.0 117.0 40 40.0 44.0 50.0 56.0 64.0 75.0 91.0 105.0 115.0 30 38.5 42.0 47.5 53.0 60.0 70.0 87.0 100.0 109.5 20 36.0 40.5 46.5 49.0 56.0 65.0 79.0 94.0 107.5 10 32.0 37.5 40.5 45.0 45.0 58.0 68.0 88.0 96.0 0 23.5 23.0 22.5 37.5 37.5 44.5 41.0 71.0 85.0 l7 18 TABLE 11 STRENGTH I % Grade Levels L43 Iié 11 5 6 '7 8 9 10 L1 12 100 65.5 78.0 74.0 87.0 105.5 128.5 15; 0 183.0 158:6 90 51.0 59.5 66.0 74.0 84.0 99.0 126 0 131.0 139.0 80 50.0 54.0 60.5 69.0 79.5 94.0 120.0 125.5 135.0 70 48.0 52.0 57.0 63.0 73.5 89.0 112.0 120.0 124.0 60 44.0 49.0 55.5 59.5 70.0 82.0 104.0 115.5 117.0 50 43.0 47.5 53.0 58.0 68.0 77.0 97.0 110.5 116.5 40 41.0 46.0 50.0 55.0 65.0 75.5 93.0 106.5 115.0 30 40.0 43.0 48.0 53.0 64.0 71.0 89.0 100.5 109.0 20 36.5 40.5 45.0 49.0 59.0 66.0 84.0 92.0 105 0 10 34.0 37.5 40.0 44.5 50.0 57.5 68.0 88.0 92.0 0 23.5 23.0 22.5 37.5 37.5 44.5 41.0 71.0 85.0 TABLE III AGILITY SL§_ Age ®+J I § 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 100 10. 9.70 9. 9.65 9.45 9. 8 40 8. 8.45 90 11. 11.20 10. 10.20 10.10 9.‘ 8.8. 8.. 8.70 80 11. 11.45 10. 10.50 10.25 10. 5 9.10 8. 8.75 70 11. 11.80 11. 10.85 10.50 10.‘ 9.30 9. 8.90 60 12. 12.15 11. 10.95 10.60 10. 9.45 9. 9.00 50 13. 12.60 11. 11.20 10.75 10. 9.70 9. 9.10 40 14. 13.15 11. 11.30 10.95 10. 10.00 9. 9.15 30 14. 13.75 12. 11.45 11.15 10. 10.10 9. 9.30 20 15. 14.40 12. 11.85 11.50 10. 10.30 9. 9.50 10 15. 14.95 14. 12.45 11.65 11. 10 65 10 9.55 0 21. 16.75 16. 14.00 12.00 12 11.75 11. 0.35 TABLE IV AGILITY 2 : . $143 Grade Level Ii§ __ 7 10 11_r 12 100 9.70 9.80 9.45 10.00 9.65 9.20 8.40 8.20 8.35 90 11.10 11.05 10.15 10.15 10.05 9.65 8.80 8.70 8.45 80 11.55 11.45 10.60 10.50 10.25 9.90 9.05 8.85 8.75 70 12.05 11.60 10.90 10.80 10.35 10 05 9.25 9.00 8.90 60 12.50 12.05 11.15 11.05 10.55 10.25 9.35 9.10 8.90 50 13.30 12.30 11.30 11.25 10.65 10.35 9.55 9.20 9.05 40 13.85 12.95 11.50 11.40 10.80 10.50 9.70 9.30 9.15 30 14.80 13.45 11.90 11.50 10.95 10.65 10.05 9.50 9.30 20 15.30 14.10 12.35 11.90 11.15 10.95 10.25 9.75 9.50 10 16.15 14.55 12.95 12.55 11.55 11.30 10.55 10.05 9.55 0 21.35 16.75 16.40 14.00 13.80 13.15 11.55 10.95 11.20 STANDING BROAD JUMP TABLE V .3 Age I I 9+3 11) 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 100 151.5 182.5 180.0 194.0 212.5 229 0 246.5 266.5 254.0 90 137.5 145.5 163.0 175.5 189.0 208.5 226.5 231.0 237.0 80 127.0 136.0 156.5 167.5 180 0 190.5 217.0 227.0 223.0 70 122.0 132.5 153.0 160.5 174.0 180.5 207.0 218.5 221.0 60 118.5 129.0 149.0 153.0 167.5 170.5 202.5 213.0 217.5 50 114.0 124.0 144.0 150.5 160.5 166.5 195.0 208.5 215.0 40 106.5 118.5 138.0 148.0 156.0 162.0 189.5 204.5 205.0 30 103.5 112.0 131.5 144.5 150.5 156.0 182.0 198.0 200.5 20 94.5 104.0 121.0 138.5 144.0 148.0 175.0 188.5 196.0 10 87.5 95.0 108.5 132.0 137 5 131.0 158.5 173.0 182.0 0 77.5 79.0 72.5 115.0 113.0 106.5 126.5 157.0 160.0 22 TABLE VI STANDING BROAD JUMP $333: Grade Levels (1) C1 Q‘S 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 100 153.0 182.5 181.0 194.0 229.0 228 5 246.5 266.5 254.0 90 137.5 146.5 163.0 175.5 192.0 203.0 226 5 231.5 237.0 80 127.5 136.0 158.0 164.5 180.5 189.5 218.0 227.0 224.5 70 122.0 133.5 154.5 155.0 178.0 181.5 211.5 218.5 222.0 60 119.0 129 0 151.0 151.5 170.5 169.5 203.5 213.5 217.5 50 114.5 124.0 146.0 149.0 166.0 162.5 200.0 207.0 211.5 40 107.5 116.0 140.5 145.0 161.5 159.5 192.5 205.0 203.5 30 104.0 108.5 135.0 143.0 156.0 156.0 188.0 197.5 199.5 20 95.0 103.5 125.5 137.0 148.5 149.0 179.5 190.0 194 0 10 87.5 93.0 120.5 131.5 141.0 131.5 173.5 173.0 172.0 0 72.5 79.0 89.0 115.0 106.5 107.5 126.5 157.0 160.0 23 TABLE VII SOFTBALL THROW s. 3 Age ®+J Q‘é 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 100 104.5 134.5 136.0 164.5 183.5 217.0 215.0 238.5 237.0 90 89.0 108.0 120.5 140.0 153.0 169.0 193.0 200.0 225.0 80 78.0 96.5 111.0 126.0 140.5 160.0 179.5 183.0 216.0 70 75.0 92.0 104.5 121.5 135.5 149.0 175.0 175.5 210.5 60 72.5 88.5 100.5 115.5 127.5 144.5 165.5 169.0 197.0 50 67.0 81.5 98.5 111.5 124.0 139.5 161.0 164.5 195.0 40 63.0 78.0 92.0 105.5 120.0 133.0 151.5 155.5 192.0 30 57.5 74.0 87.0 102.5 112.5 128.5 145.0 146.0 187.5 20 55.0 67.0 80.0 98.0 105 5 125.5 137.0 138.0 177.5 10 49.0 57.5 70.0 88.5 95.0 112 0 121.0 129.5 152.5 0 32.0 30.5 32.5 77.0 68.0 95.5 81.0 90.0 116.0 24 TABLE VIII SOFTBALL THROW Per- centile }_J I—‘I'DUO-B'U‘IONNCDKOO 0000000000 0 Grade Level 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 111.5 134.5 157.5 183.5 180.0 217 0 215 0 238.5 237.0 81.5 108.0 121.5 143.5 153.0 175.0 195.0 207.5 226.0 76.5 97.5 113.0 131.5 143.0 161.0 179.0 192.5 216.5 74.0 92.5 106.0 123.0 135.5 151.5 175.0 180.5 212.0 69.5 90.5 101.5 116.0 130.0 144.5 165.5 171.5 197.5 65.5 86.5 99.5 113.5 125.0 140.0 161.0 166.0 196 0 60.5 81.5 95.5 108.0 120 5 135.5 152.0 155.5 192.0 57.5 78.0 88.5 103.0 115.0 128 5 145.5 149.0 187.0 55.0 73.0 83.0 100.0 106.0 125.5 133.0 141.5 177.5 47.0 63.0 75.0 93.5 101.5 111.5 121.0 134.5 152.5 32.0 30.5 58.5 76.5 68.0 95.5 81.0 90.0 140.0 25 TABLE Ix FLEXIBILITY 0.4 CI 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 100 25.0 25.5 26.0 27.5 28.0 29.5 31.0 32.0 41.5 90 17.5 17.5 19.5 19.0 20.5 24.0 27 0 28.5 29.5 80 15.5 15.0 16.0 16.5 19.5 20.5 22.5 26.5 27.5 70 13.0 14.0 14.0 15.5 17.5 19.0 20.5 24.0 24.0 60 12.5 12.0 13.0 14.5 15.5 17.5 19.0 23.0 22.0 50 12.0 10.5 12.0 13.0 13.5 15.0 16.5 21.0 21.5 40 11.0 10.0 11.0 12.5 12.5 14.0 15.5 19.0 20.0 30 9.5 8.5 9.5 11.0 11.0 12.5 14.0 17.0 19.0 20 6.5 6.0 7.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 12.5 14.5 14.5 10 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.5 6.0 5.0 10.5 10.0 11.0 0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 2.0 2.0 4.5 TABLE X FLEXIBILITY I33 Grade Levels ®+J 3 § 5 7 8 10 11 12 100 25.0 25.5 26.0 27.5 28.0 29.0 31 0 35.0 41.5 90 18.0 17.0 19.5 19.5 21.0 22.5 28.0 28.5 29.5 80 15.5 15.0 15.5 17.5 19.0 20.5 24.0 25.5 27.5 70 13.5 13.5 14.0 15.5 17.5 18.8 22.0 24.0 23.0 60 12.5 12.0 12.5 15.0 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 21.5 50 11.5 10.5 12.0 13.5 13.5 15.0 18.5 21.0 20.5 40 10.5 10.0 11.0 13.0 12.5 14.5 16.0 19.5 19.0 30 9.5 8.5 9.0 12.0 12.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 14.5 20 7.0 6.0 6.5 10.0 10.0 9.5 12.5 14.5 12.0 10 5.0 3.0 4.0 6.5 3.5 6.5 10.5 10.0 7.5 0 1.0 10. 1.5 1.5 0.5 3.5 2.0 2.0 4.5 TABLE XI CARDIO-PULMONARY (Step Test) 0) AI: Age (1)4) 0.. :1 g 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 100 39 24 29 30 30 20 22 34 35 90 45 45 46 43 46 43 41 44 43 80 51 50 52 48 51 47 49 49 49 7O 54 55 57 53 53 5O 52 52 51 6O 57 57 59 56 55 54 55 55 55 5O 59 60 6O 59 57 59 58 58 56 40 61 62 62 61 60 62 60 60 60 30 63 63 65 65 63 65 61 64 61 20 65 67 68 67 67 70 64 67 65 10 69 69 7O 7O 7O 75 69 73 69 O 72 75 83 76 9O 9O 73 80 77 TABLE XII CARDIO-PULMONARY (Step Test) 28 36% Grade Levels {la (3 8 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 100 39 24 29 30 33 20 23 34 ‘35 90 47 44 46 41 48 42 42 44 37 80 52 46 52 47 52 45 50 49 43 7O 55 53 56 52 54 47 53 52 49 6O 57 56 59 55 58 51 56 55 5O 50 60 58 60 57 60 54 58 58 55 40 62 61 63 60 63 60 60 60 56 30 63 62 65 62 65 62 63 61 60 20 66 66 68 65 69 65 65 65 62 10 69 69 70 69 71 70 69 70 67 0 72 75 83 90 80 90 76 80 77 29 TABLE XIII HEIGHT Per- centile Age 10 ll 12 l3 l4 l5 16 17 18 H I—‘I'DUO-II'UIONIODKOO 0000000000 0 157.0 169.0 163.0 174.5 188.0 195.0 191.0 192.0 193.5 148.0 155.0 157.0 164.0 170.5 177.0 186.0 187.5 187 5 144.0 151.0 155.0 161.0 169.0 174.5 181.0 185.0 184.5 143.0 149.5 153 0 157.0 166.0 173.5 179.0 183.0 183.0 142.0 148.5 150.0 154.0 162.5 170.0 177 0 181.0 181.0 141.0 146.0 148.0 152.0 161.0 167.5 176.0 180.0 180.0 139 0 144.0 146 5 151.0 158.5 165 5 173.5 177.0 178.5 137.0 142.0 144.5 150.0 154.0 163.5 171.5 174.0 177.5 135.0 140.0 143.0 147.0 151.5 160.0 168.5 172.5 176 0 131.0 138 0 139 0 145.5 148 0 155.5 163.5 169 5 175.0 127.0 130.0 135.0 137.0 144.0 147 0 149 0 153.0 172.5 TABLE XIV HEIGHT .3 :33 Grade Levels (1) C Q‘S 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 100 156.0 169.0 163.0 174.5 188 0 195.0 191.0 192.0 193.5 90 147.0 156.0 159.0 164.5 172.0 178.5 186.0 188.0 186.5 80 144.0 152.0 156.0 161.0 170.0 175.3 182.5 185.0 183 0 70 142.0 150 0 153.5 158.0 167.0 174.0 179 5 183.0 182.0 60 142.0 149.0 152.0 154.0 165.0 170.5 177.0 181.0 181.0 50 140.0 148.0 150.0 152.0 167.5 168 5 176.0 180.0 179.5 40 138.0 145.0 147 0 150.0 161 0 166.0 174.0 178.5 178.0 30 137.0 143.5 145.0 148.0 157.5 163 5 171.5 176 0 176.5 20 135.0 141.5 143.0'147.0 154.0 162.0 169.5 173.0 175.0 10 134.0 138.0 139 0 144.0 151.0 157.5 164.5 170.0 174.0 0 127.0 130.0 135.0 137.0 146 0 147.0 149 0 153 0 170.5 31 TABLE xv WEIGHT 3.5% Age 644 - a‘§ 10 11 12 ‘13 114 15 16 17 18 100 139 126 135 170 183 199 210 218 200 90 95 111 106 119 135 159 167 176 192 80 84 99 100 108 121 142 154 168 173 70 79 94 97 102 120 134 146 159 167 60 77 89 95 95 113 125 142 155 159 50 74 84 91 91 108 122 139 150 153 40 71 82 85 86 101 120 135 145 147 30 69 78 80 84 96 115 131 138 144 20 66 74 75 80 91 106 126 135 140 10 65 69 70 78 86 100 116 126 133 0 54 55 62 70 70 78 92 104 129 TABLE XVI WEIGHT IA) ID u 33. Grade Levels $14 °T-‘I 042 fl: :1 g 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 100 139 130 135 170 183 199 210 218 200 90 93 114 109 120 138 159 168 178 195 80 84 99 100 110 128 141 159 169 182 70 79 95 97 105 122 134 152 161 162 60 77 90 94 99 119 128 145 155 160 50 75 84 91 92 111 121 143 151 155 40 72 82 87 86 107 120 139 145 151 30 70 78 81 84 100 115 135 138 146 20 67 73 75 80 96 106 130 135 141 10 65 68 71 78 87 100 117 126 133 0 54 55 62 70 70 78 92 104 129 TABLE XVI I SKINFOLD (FAT) MEASUREMENT OF ARM 3 3 Q) .:.' Age :44) (DC 8:8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 100 40.0 32.5 35.0 35.0 33.5 31.0 26.0 35.5 23.5 90 19.0 22.0 20.5 18.5 19.5 20.0 17.0 17.0 19.0 80 16.0 18.5 18.5 15.5 16.0 17.0 13.5 14.0 15.0 70 13.5 16.0 15.5 14.0 13.0 15.5 11.5 12.5 12.5 60 12.5 15.0 13.5 12.5 12.0 13.5 9.0 10.5 11.0 50 11.5 13.5 12.0 11.0 10.5 13.0 8.5 9.5 9.0 40 10.5 11.5 10.5 9.5 10.0 11.5 7.0 8.0 8.5 30 9.5 10.0 10.0 9.0 9.5 10.5 7.0 7.0 8.0 20 8.5 9.0 9.0 8.5 8.0 9.0 6.0 6.0 7.5 10 7.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 6.5 0 5.0 5.5 6.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 4.0 4.0 5.5 ARM SKINFOLD (FAT) MEASUREMENT TABLE XVI I I 34 I. n E Grade Levels S—m-I cm.) W 0.4 C. 8 5 7 8 10 11 12 100 40.0 35.0 29.0 38.0 33.5 31.0 35.5 24.0 23.5 90 20.0 22.0 19.5 19.5 19.5 20.0 18.5 16.5 19.0 80 15.5 18.5 17.0 16.5 16.0 17.0 14.5 14.0 17.0 70 11Lc> 16.0 14.0 15.0 1343 llLO 12.0 12.0 13.5 60 13.0 14.5 13.0 13.0 12.5 13.0 9.0 10.5 11.5 50 11.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 10.5 11.5 9.0 9.0 10.0 40 10.5 11.5 10.0 10.0 10.0 11.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 30 10.0 11.0 9.0 9.0 9.5 9.0 7.0 7.0 8.0 20 8.5 9.0 8.5 8.5 8.0 7.5 6.0 6.0 7.5 10 7.5 8.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.0 7.0 0 5.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 4.0 4.0 6.0 I TABLE XIX SUBSCAPULAR SKINFOLD (FAT) MEASUREMENT 35 (I) I: Age S—I-H (DC. D“8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 100 29.5 28.5 35.5 25.0 29.5 34.0 38.0 28.5 28.5 90 11.0 14.0 12.5 11.0 11.5 13.0 12.0 14.0 14.0 80 9.0 10.5 10.0 8.5 9.5 10.5 10.0 12.0 11.5 70 8.0 9.5 8.0 7.5 8.0 9.0 8.5 10.0 10.0 60 7.0 8.5 7.5 6.5 7.0 8.5 8.0 9.0 10.0 50 6.5 7.5 7.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 8.0 9.0 9.5 40 6.0 7.0 6.5 6.0 6.5 7.5 7.0 8.0 9.0 30 6.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 6.5 7.0 7.0 8.0 8.5 20 5.5 6.0 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.0 8.0 10 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.5 7.0 0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.5 36 TABLE XX SUBSCAPULAR SKINFOLD (FAT) MEASUREMENT Per- centile Grade Levels H O O I—' [DUO JrUl O\\] CDKO 000000000 0 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 29.5 35.5 23.5 43.5 29.5 34.0 38.0 28.5 28.5 12.0 12.5 11.0 11.5 11.5 13.5 12.0 12.5 17.5 9.0 10.0 9.0 8.5 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.5 14.0 8.0 9.5 7.5 7.5 8.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 12.0 7.5 8.0 7.0 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.0 9.0 10.5 7.0 7.5 6.5 6.0 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 10.0 6.0 7.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 8.0 8.0 10.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.5 7.0 8.0 9.5 5.5 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 8.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.5 8.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.5 HIP SKINFOLD (FAT) MEASUREMENT TABLE XXI 37 2 Age I-r-I :44» (1):: 933 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 100 44.0 41.0 43.5 41.5 39.0 42.0 49.5 44.5 42.0 90 22.0 29.5 28.0 23.0 24.0 28.0 27.5 28.5 30.0 80 15.5 25.5 22.5 15.5 16.0 22.0 19.0 22.0 24.0 70 14.0 20.5 18.5 12.0 13.0 17.0 16.0 19.0 16.0 60 11.5 16.5 13.0 9.5 11.5 15.0 12.5 16.5 14.0 50 10.5 13.5 11.0 8.5 10.0 13.0 11.0 13.5 13.0 40 8.0 11.0 9.0 8.0 8.5 11.5 10.0 10.0 11.0 30 7.0 9.5 8.0 7.0 7.5 10.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 20 6.0 7.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 9.0 10 5.0 6.5 5.5 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.5 7.5 0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 TABLE XXII . HIP SKINFOLD (FAT) MEASUREMENT 38 $1.3 Grade Levels m1, ._ Q4§ 6 8 9 10 11 12 100 44.0 43.0 43.5 45.0 39.0 42.0 49.5 42.5 42.0 90 25.5 29.5 25.0 24.0 23.5 25.0 28.5 27.5 30.0 80 16.0 24.5 21.5 18.5 16.0 19.0 20.0 19.0 26.0 70 14.5 20.5 15.5 12.5 14.0 15.5 19.0 16.5 19.0 60 13.0 16.5 11.5 10.0 12.0 12.0 16.0 14.0 14.5 50 10.5 13.5 9.5 9.0 10.5 11.0 13.0 11.0 13.5 40 8.5 11.5 8.5 8.0 9.0 9.5 10.5 9.5 12.5 30 7.5 9.5 8.0 7.0 8.0 7.5 10.0 8.5 11.0 20 6.5 8.0 6.5 6.5 7.0 6.5 8.0 7.5 9.0 10 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.5 6.0 8.0 0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 TABLE XXI I I ABDOMINAL SKINFOLD (FAT) MEASUREMENT 39 r3 Age Levels H I 4: LI: 318 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 100 45.5 45.5 45.5 39.0 48. 44.5 54.5 47.5 46.5 90 20.5 30.5 27.5 24.0 21. 26.5 25.5 26.0 27.0 80 16.5 25.5 22.0 16.0 18. 23.0 17.0 21.5 25.0 70 13.5 20.5 18.0 12.0 14. 17.5 15.0 17.0 15.0 60 10.5 16.0 11.5 9.5 11. 14.0 13.5 14.5 14.0 50 9.5 13.5 10.5 8.5 10. 11.0 11.5 13.0 12.0 40 8.0 10.0 8.0 7.0 8. 10.0 10.0 10.5 11.5 30 6.0 9.0 7.0 6.5 8. 8.5 8.5 9.0 11.0 20 6.0 7. 6.0 5.5 7. 6.5 8.0 8.0 7.5 10 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 6. 5.0 6.5 6. 6.0 0 4.0 4.5 3.5 4.0 3. 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 TABLE XXIV ABDOMINAL SKIN FOLD (FAT) MEASUREMENT 4O 3 Grade Levels :33 :4: ma) 8'0 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ll 12 100 45.5 45.5 44.0 59. 44.5 44. 54.5 47.5 46. 90 24.0 31.0 24.5 27. 22.5 25. 31.0 24.0 30. 80 16.5 25.5 19.5 20. 18.0 19. 19.5 19.0 25. 70 14.0 21.0 14.5 15. 14.5 16. 16.0 15.5 16. 60 11.5 16.0 11.5 11. 11.5 12. 14.0 14.0 12. 50 9.5 13.5 9.0 9. 10.0 10. 12.5 11.5 12. 40 9.0 10.0 7.5 8. 8.5 9. 11.0 10.0 11. 30 6.5 8.5 6.5 7. 8.0 7. 9.5 9.0 11. 20 6.0 7.0 5.5 6. 7.0 6. 8.0 8.0 8. 10 5.0 5.5 4.5 5. 5.0 6.5 6.0 7. O 4.0 4.5 3.5 4. 3.0 5.0 5.0 5. FRONT THIGH SKINFOLD (FAT) MEASUREMENT TABLE XXV 41 1% Age Levels II? 338 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 100 51. 45.0 45.0 45. 45.0 37.0 40. 55. 32. 90 27. 29.5 29.5 26. 26.5 23.0 25. 22. 21. 8o 23. 24.0 25.0 20. 21.0 20.5 20. 17. 17. 7o 20. 23.5 23.0 19. 18.5 19.5 17. 15. 14. 60 19. 20.5 20.0 17. 16.5 17.0 14. 14. 14. 50 17. 18.5 18.5 15. 15.5 15.5 12. 13. 13. 4o 16. 16.5 15.5 15. 14.5 14.0 11. 1o. 12. 3o 15. 15.0 15.0 14. 13.5 13.5 10. 10. 11. 2o 14. 13.0 13.5 12. 11.5 11.0 9. 9. 10. 1o 11. 11.0 10.0 9. 10.0 10.0 9. 8. 9. o 7. 6.5 8.0 4. 7.0 7.0 5. 6. 8. TABLE XXVI FRONT THIGH SKINFOLD (FAT) MEASUREMENT 42 33 Grade Levels III 318 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 100 51.5 45.0 44.0 52.5 37.5 37.0 55.0 52.0 32.5 90 27.5 30.0 28.5 26.5 27.0 22.0 25.5 21.0 21.5 80 23.0 25.0 24.5 23.5 19.5 20.5 21.5 17.0 17.5 70 20.0 23.5 21.0 20.0 17.5 18.5 17.5 15.0 14.5 60 19.0 20.5 19.0 18.5 16.5 16.5 14.5 14.0 14.0 50 17.5 18.5 17.5 16.0 15.5 14.5 13.5 12.0 13.5 40 16.5 16.0 15.0 15.5 14.5 13.5 12.0 11.0 12 30 15.0 15.0 14.5 13.5 13.5 12.0 10.5 10.0 10.5 20 14.5 13.0 13.0 12.0 11.5 11.0 9.5 9.0 10.0 10 11.5 10.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 8.0 8.0 9.0 0 7.5 6.5 6.0 4.0 7.0 8.0 5.5 6.0 8.5 TABLE XXVII TOTAL SKINFOLD (FAT) MEASUREMENT 43 3 Age Levels H I p 88 v QIO 10 ll l2 l3 14 15 l6 17 18 100 210.5 172.0 204.0 186.0 228.0 188.0 199.0 282.0 205.0 90 89.5 126.5 107.5 93.0 108.0 103.5 112.0 108.5 132.5 80 76.5 102.0 94.5 74.0 74.0 92 5 77.0 84.5 93.5 70 69.0 88.0 82.5 63.5 67.0 76.0 64.0 72.5 71.5 60 58.5 74.5 62.0 53.5 60.0 66.0 53.5 63.5 64.5 50 53.5 66.0 55.0 49.0 53.0 60.0 48.5 59.0 60.5 40 50.0 57.0 50.0 45.0 49.5 54.0 46.5 47.5 53.0 30 47.5 53.0 46.5 41.5 45.0 48.0 43.0 44.5 49.0 20 41.0 44.5 40.5 39.5 41.0 41.5 38.0 42.0 45.5 10 34.5 39.5 35.0 32.0 38.0 37.0 35.5 36.5 39.0 0 28.0 30.0 27.0 22.0 22 O 31.0 16.5 31.0 33.5 TABLE XXVIII TOTAL SKINFOLD (FAT) MEASUREMENTS 44 fl Grade Levels Inge I8 8 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 100 210.5 204.0 179.5 238.0 228.0 188.0 282 0 192.5 205.0 90 108.0 127.5 104.0 111.0 108.0 103.5 125.5 91.5 135.0 80 76.5 103.5 89.0 89.0 75.0 87.5 86.0 74.5 102.5 70 69.5 88.0 73.5 68.5 67.0 71.5 72.0 64.5 84.5 60 63.5 76.0 60.5 59.5 60.0 61.0 63.5 59.0 65.0 50 54.5 65.0 54.5 51.5 53.5 54.0 53.0 53.5 62.5 40 51.0 56.5 48.0 47.0 51.5 50.0 48.5 45.0 53.0 30 47.5 49.0 44.5 43.5 45.0 43.5 45.0 43.0 50.5 20 41.0 43.0 37.5 41.0 41.0 38.0 39.5 40.0 47.5 10 36.5 36.0 34.5 35.5 37.0 35.5 35.5 35.0 42.5 0 28.0 30.0 24.5 22.0 22.0 31.0 16.5 31.0 33.5 fir . .1 600 YD. RUN-WALK TABLE XXIX .t' U7 BI Age Levels H I +3 4 I14 5:: £38 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 100 127 113 116 111 110 97 94 89 92 90 135 134 126 121 115 109 101 97‘ 96 80 140 140 130 128 122 121 105 101 100 70 147 143 136 133 124 125 107 103 102 60 152 150 141 140 130 130 110 107 105 50 158 157 146 144 133 133 114 109 105 40 165 164 150 148 137 139 117 113 106 30 174 172 154 150 140 142 120 117 109 20 190 180 165 156 147 151 125 120 114 10 200 203 168 165 158 161 142 125 120 0 230 249 240 223 270 195 175 206 148 600 YD. RUN WALK TABLE XXX 46 E Grade Level n.o 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 100 127 113 112 110 97 99 94 89 92 90 137 133 126 120 115 115 100 98 95 80 145 136 128 126 120 121 104 102 99 70 152 142 133 133 123 125 107 104 102 60 157 147 138 138 127 128 110 107 103 50 164 150 144 144 132 132 113 109 105 40 168 160 147 147 136 139 117 111 106 30 174 170 150 152 139 143 120 116 108 20 190 183 156 158 142 151 124 120 112 10 200 203 165 166 150 166 137 125 120 0 240 249 179 223 270 195 175 206 142 47 TABLE XXXI PULL UPS 8 l 7 l 6 l 5 l S l H. e l V e L e 3 g l A 2 l l l 1 0 l mHHpcmo Immm 15 17 10 13 11 11 12 12 13 10 18 100 10 9O 10 80 7O 6O 50 4O 3O 2O 10 48 TABLE XXXII PULL UPS 11 12 10 Grade Levels 6HHpcmo Ismm 2O l7 13 11 13 12 10 13 11 100 11 9O 8O 10 7O 60 50 4O 3O 2O 10 49 TABLE XXXIII PUSH UPS m Age Levels Per— centile 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 100 30 55 35 41 33 42 57 5O 6O 9O 20 22 21 3O 22 27 3O 4O 43 80 17 17 16 25 2O 22 25 32 4O 7O 15 15 15 19 15 20 21 3O 35 6O 13 14 13 16 15 20 2O 25 3O 50 10 12 12 15 13 15 17 23 28 4O 10 10 1O 11 11 13 15 21 25 30 7 9 9 10 10 11 14 20 23 20 6 7 7 5 9 9 ll 15 21 10 4 5 5 3 5 7 8 12 20 0 0 1 1 0 1 3 1 2 7 TABLE XXXIV PUSH UPS g Grade Leve ls III 338 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 100 30 55 41 37 33 42 57 50 60 90 20 23 21 30 2o 28‘ 30 40 43 80 17 18 16 25 20 25 25 35 40 7o 15 15 15 20 15 21 21 3o 35 60 13 14 13 16 14 20 20 26 32 50 10 12 11 15 12 2o 17 25 30 4o 9 11 10 12 10 15 15 22 25 30 7 9 9 10 10 12 14 20 23 20 6 6 7 6 7 10 11 15 21 10 5 5 5 4 5 8 10 12 20 0 0 1 2 0 1 3 1 2 7 Number, Name , School 001' 1'3 Date of Birth , Date of Testing 001‘ 558 Grade Level 001' 9'l0 Strength., Trial 1 , Trial 2 001° 11'1” Agility. Trial 1 , Trial 2 001‘ 15738_ Power. Coli 19_22 a. Standing Jump. Trial l_____J Trial 2 b. Softball Throw. Trial 1 , Trial 2 Col. 23-26 Flexibility. Trial 1 , Trial 2 Col. 27-29 Cardio-Pulmonary Col. 30-32 Pulse Reading-—1 min.-—l min. after test AnthrOpometric Col. _ 6 a. Height. Trial 1 , Trial 2 33 3 b. Weight. Col. - 7 Fat Measurements fiBTT—fififflg 1. Arm. Trial 1 , Trial 2 SUIT—43:45 2. Subscapular. Trial 1 , Trial 2 of, 46-48 3 Hip. Trial 1 , Trial 2 bfijfi‘figtgf' 4. Abdomen. Trial 1 , Trial 2 ‘CEIf‘Sgrgfi 5 Front Thigh. Trial 1‘ , Trial 2 UBIf—ggtgg 6. Total Fat Muscular Endurance Col. 59-62’ 1. 600 Yard Run—Walk o . _ 2. Chins o 5— 3. Push ups FIGURE 1 SAMPLE TEST CARD A — Chair 7\ /’ \\ 8I Starting Line6 FIGURE 2 Ibid., p. 83 52 9. 5. gr“- - MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRAP'ES II III'IIII'IH II ° I 2 II: III II. I» we: 29 19 1943 303 6 i ‘v. “I 3 1' ‘V