‘ II a 44.0.4. .. l o. . . .. .... . . . . Ar- . . p. . .0. ...-.44... o . .... ... 4 4 .. . . ... . . . . ..4 4040 0. \ ...:44 ...-.....4. .4... ...... ...... . . ... . o .4 . .. . .. .. . .4... .44 4 44.4.- 44... 4.. . .4..v .. .. ... . ... .. ... ...: 4 .. . ... _ _. . . . '4H4:7.4.—.o. 4.4.0.4 4- . _ 4 .. . 4. 4.4 .0. v . . . .. ...... . . . . .. . 4 ' . . on . ... _ .. ... ... .. a .. . . .4 ........O ,. .. . _. . . ... 4 . ..4... . . . . . . . ... o . . . . ., .. .. . .. . . .. . ... . .. ... .... . . .... . .. I... .. . o 4- .. . . . . 4 . . . . . .. .. .. u. 4. .44 ..4 .. .. . _‘.o. . . 44 . 4. .. . 4 . ._ .. . .... .... . .. . . .. 4 . . 7 .. 4. . . ... t . .4 . . . . . .. . .. .- . ..... \_ I 4 . v .. _ 4. 4 4 g 4 . . . . ... . .. . .. o 4 ,. . 4 .. 4 . ... 4. . .4 . o .... -. a... 4 4 . . .. . . .4 ... o . 4.. . . . . 4 . .. l . ... ...? .. v . 4 ......4... . . . . . .. . . o .. .. . .4... . . ... . ... 4 .0. . .. .. .... _ .. a . . C . _ .. 2 .. . .. .. . . .. _ . 4 4 4 4 . . . 4... 4.. .. ... . . .. . .. o 4 .4 .4 . 4 .. .. . . .. . ... ._ . . . . .. .... . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .... 4. . ... .4. I _ _ . . . .. . ‘ p . . . .. .. . . . . . . .. . o! 4 . _ .. . . ... . .. 4 .. ‘ . .... . . .. .. ... _ 4 . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. n . . o . .4 . 4 . . .. .44. . . . . 4. . .. . .. . . . n. . . .. .... .. .... u . . . 4 . .. .4 . .4 . _ . .4 . . _ . . ‘.. N o. .. .. . ... . . . . .4 .. .. o 4 . I. . . . s ”.. ... .... ... . _. _. . . . o. . . .. . . . . . Y . . . . _ .. . .. 4 . n . . . .1 . . . . . . ... . 4 .. _ . ... o 4 . . . . . . .. . . 4 4. o . . . . o . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 .. ' . 4 v . .... 4 .. .. . . .. o .4 .. .. 4... . . .... . . 4 ” Z. n 4 4 . 4. 4. . 4.. ..44 . a 4.4.vv. . . .. .. . a. _. ... . . .. .. . o . . .. . O . . . .4 .....4. . ._ . . ..v . .. . .0 .... u o .4 . . 4 . J .4 K . .u 4.. .. . . . .. _. . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . .. .. .7 . . . .4 4 . . . .4 4 . . . .. . ... v . . . a. 4 ... ’4 . . o .. . . 4 . 4. . . . .. . . . . .. . . . .. I . ... . . .. . .. fl 0 . .4 . 4 .. . . . .. ..4.v .v. 7.. . n . . ' 4. .4. u v 4.. . I | . . V . ... . .4... . . . o. . . . . . . . .... . . . . . fl. 4 . 4 o .7 .. 4 . v . . . 4 . _ 4 ca 4.. . .. .4 ._ O _ . . . a. . n 4 o n . . . ... . I O . . _ n . . . ... . o t t .. . ._ 4. 4 4 . .. . . . ". 4 . .4 . . .44 .4... . .. 1.4 .4 _ . . . . . . . .. . . . . 1. _ . .. .. .. .. . . . . . . u . v . . . . 4 . . . . . . O I .- 4 4 4 O . . . . . 4. . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . ... . . ‘ 7 -. . . . .. . . . 4 . . .. '. . 7 s n . .n p 4 4 . 1 K c a I . .. “O . .4 . .. 4 . . . V4 . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . 44.. .. . o 4 . . . . v 4 l..(7.p.f4..0_.'..\r v . . . . 4 .4 4 _ .4 . . 4.0.45 . .. . . . .. 1 . .. I . .. . . K44... . 4 . . . . . . .345 . 4. 4 . . . . . .v.. n. . . . . . . .. . r . u. . . ....144:..l... 400.. :7744 . . . ... .4 4 - .7 u A o u. . . 4. . 4 . . . ... . 4 ..7 . ... 4...4f.l.14 a 0.4.1.4.04J049P40'4l . 4. 4 o. . . . . . . .7 . . ... 4 c at . .. _ . . . .. . .. ... ... ... ... ..pt.c. I . 4 . . . . n ...14. . , . _ . . . . . . , .. ... . . ... .4 . 4 v.rll...4o 4. ..oroUO . . . .. . . - . . . . . .. ......._. ... 2...}; .. J . .. . . . .. I. ..,. ¢ . 07v ..4 7.... ... . . . .. . . . ... 4 . .un' . .. . . .. o. . . ... , . .. .. .... 4.. 7.. . ,‘.4....o. ..u.z..... . 4 . _ . . - v .. . l . . ... . . . . .. 2 ... ... . .... .. 4. .0. 44'to...o .44 . . . c4 . 4 s Q 4 . . . ._ . . — 4 r u .040 . . 4 . . .. : 4 .... 4.7.4 .4 V. o . 4 . 4, 1 ..7.. .4. v . . 4 . .. . 4 ’ 0474.: If. . ... . . x I . ........ 4 - .1 . o c . ... u . .. 440.4 . ..4. . o . 4 . 4. . . 4 . _ . I a .4. l .4.4.'JJ ..yfi. .. .4 ... .4. . . . ..D... .. .... 4 4,vv.....;¢.' .4 . . _ . . . . .......':.u....74..Ilvfl...l.. . o _ 4 44 . 4 . .. . .. v...(.:u... 7 , 70D¢.’r. A _ ... .. . . . . . .— . 4 , «A . . .. , : _ .7. . . . . .. . . . . p . . . . .fl . v n a. ‘ .. . . o :4 a ‘ v . _ O .. 4.. . .. 1...; . . . . . . .. a v .. . . 3f . . u 4 . 4 4 4 4 . . . . a V . . . v . .. , 4 . . .4 . . .. 4, . . .. . . . . ... . . .. . . . .... . . . o . . 4 4 . . . . c . - . . 4 .7 o . o , . . . . . . .4 . .. . . .. ..4 4 .... ... 4 . . . O l . I _ . . n .. 4 . . .. .. . . . . . . . . r . . 4 . . .. . 4. 4.. . . 4. t . . a. . .. .. . . . . .. 4 . 4 . ‘ . . . .. 4 . . .. . . . .. . . u . o. . 4 o 4 H . N . . : . . . . . . .. J .. . I . . . . 4 . . . u . . 4 . 4 . . . . . . . . v. . . . . . . 4 4 u 0 . . 4 l . . . .. . .I .. u 4 . ., . . _ . . 4. . . . . 4. 4 . . o . . . 4 . .4 . .. . . . . 4 .. . . _ _. . . . ... . x . . . . . .. . . . . . . o a. 4 4 o . . . 4 . . . . . . . . . n . . . . . C . . I . I o 4 . . . . 4 . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . o. . u . . . . . 4 . . . . A _ . . . . _ . . . .. :4. . . \ . . . A,“ 0"‘°""0"""‘ . . : J- . . . n 4 . . . u . o ' . _ . . . . . _ . _ .. . . . . . . . . . . . 4 . 4 . . . u . . . . . . .. 4 . . . . .4 I - 4 o . O ” . . . . 4 . . . . . . . ‘ . . . O . . 4 . . . . .4. . . . . . . . I . . u 7o. O O 7 a _ . . .Ql w . 04."... ..7' O 4. .Ool| 4 4 . O . . . 4. 7. 4o. 4 . 4. . v . I . 4 o a .. . O . . O 4 o . 7 . . 4 . 4 t o 4. . . . l . .c . . . _ n . . . o .. . . O . . o O . 4 . u . . . . . . . 4 . m . . _ 4 . . . 4 v . . . . I . . .. . . I (v! I 4! v . 4 I 4 ....4... .... I.......4;v...:4 .9 .. .. ...; ......7 .74...—.‘7-L....4.. ._ .. . ....4444. I. . .... 4-3.1.... .....u....... .....49 4.. v ... I ... . v u . a . . . .05. .. n . .4 4. ...-....l... 7 . 0A..... 0. v . ... I... . Q4 «’44. 4.4.5 . S .P. .7..,L‘ 0 fi 0 o . .74 . .. . ._ . . . .. a 7 .4... 4. v In .1IV5}.‘544.. 4 .4r.Abfluv.é4O..'FO.A ngfig- 4 .I o . .. . . 474‘s” . (Fri... 4‘. .401... nt \,‘O".sk‘ 4.0t447.._ (O. 4 . 4! . .4' .v 4 ... co . . . . .L ... I. .44 ...! 3:00. .7... 7.. ‘1 ..7. 4.14:1er.L.. J. .5. o v .4 t . o .4. ....4. 4‘)....... ..‘u '4 O. .74 I‘. ..t . . .u 0 . 0. \ 4 . ABSTRACT DIETARY INTAKE AND NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF PRESCHOOL CHILDREN IN WESTERN MICHIGAN DAY CARE CENTERS BY Donna Kimberley Brooks This study involved a two-day investigation of nutrient intake of 275 preschool children attending nine Western Michigan day care centers as well as a comparison of nutrient intake with height and weight increments of the children over a three—month interval. All food served to the children for meals and snacks for one day was weighed prior to serving and the remaining food, uneaten and spilled food was subtracted to determine total daily intake for each nutrient. The total calories and ten nutrients contributed by these foods were calculated from food composition tables and compared with the 1968 Recommended Dietary Allowances taking into account the proposed recommendations by the Michigan Department of Public Health for day care provision for the child's nutrient needs. The nutrient supplied most often in lowest amounts was iron followed by calories and thiamin. Protein and riboflavin were supplied in the Donna Kimberley Brooks greatest amounts. Overall average intake for all nutrients except iron for all nine day care centers met the recom— mended range. The per cent contribution of meals and snacks to calorie, protein and total nutrient intake was dependent on the number of meals served with snacks contributing almost 50 per cent of the total caloric and nutrient intake in centers serving only one meal. Heights and weights of 140 preschool children, average age 4 years, at six of the day care centers were taken twice over a three-month period and compared with an average of increments suggested by various authors for this age group. Height increment averages for both girls and boys were in good agreement with the standard increments whereas weight increments for both girls and boys were above the standards. These data indicated that the average of seven hours spent per day at the center at least did not have a negative impact on growth and may have played a large part in contributing to this growth. Menus were obtained ahead of time to observe how closely they were followed by the cooks. Modifications were found to a considerable degree at some centers but, in general, the changes were only slight. Hemoglobin data were obtained for children at two day care centers. Average values for each center fell within the acceptable range as set by the ICNND. Donna Kimberley Brooks During the two—day period of study at each day care center, descriptive information concerning general opera- tions and menu planning and food service practices was also obtained through personal observation and informal inter- views with the cooks and/or directors. DIETARY INTAKE AND NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF PRESCHOOL CHILDREN IN WESTERN MICHIGAN DAY CARE CENTERS BY Donna Kimberley Brooks A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition 1971 ...- ; I / f ' 3 , ’ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author wishes to express sincere gratitude to Dr. Rachel Schemmel for her guidance and advice throughout the graduate study. Special thanks also go to Miss Katherine Hart for her understanding and encouragement and to Drs. Olaf Mickelsen and Dorice Narins for their helpful suggestions and assistance. Appreciation is extended to Mrs. Linnea Werner, Miss Frances Heymans and Miss Gladys Duppstadt for their guidance in the initiation of this study and their concern and interest throughout. Special gratitude is extended to the staff and children of the nine participating day care centers for their c00peration in making this study possible. Deepest thanks go to my husband, Jim, for his invaluable assistance and continued patience and reas— surance 0 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,ii LIST OF TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V LIST OF FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vi Chapter I. REVIEW OF LITERATURE . . . . . . . . . 1 Day Care . . . . . . . l Nutritional Patterns of Preschool Children . 7 Nutritional Status of Preschool Children . . 19 II. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 III. METHODS O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 27 Selection and Description of Sample . . . . 27 Food Intakes . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Heights and Weights . . . . . . . . . 3l Hemoglobin Data . . . . . . . . . . 32 IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION . . . . . . . . . 36 Nutrient Intake . . . . . . . . . 36 Menu Modification and Typical Representation . 40 Height and Weight Increment . . . . . . 42 Hemoglobin . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 V. DESCRIPTIVE FACTORS CONCERNING NINE WESTERN MICHIGAN DAY CARE CENTERS . . . . . . . . 64 General Operational Information . . . . . 64 Menu Planning and Food Service Practices . . 67 VI. CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER STUDY . 76 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 iii Page BIBLIOGRAPHY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 APPENDIX 0 O C O O O O O O O O O I O I O 8 8 iv LI ST OF TABLE S Table Page 1. Description of Nine Western Michigan Day Care Centers and the Participating Children . . . 33 2. Total Number of Preschool Children Eating Meals and Snacks During a Two-day Study at each of Nine Western Michigan Day Care Centers . . . 34 3. Outline of Procedures Used in Collecting Height and Weight Data for Preschool Children in Nine Western Michigan Day Care Centers . . . 35 4. Nutrient Content of Selected Foods on a 100 gram Basis with Per Cent Agreement Between Two Food Composition Tables . . . . . . . . 46 5. Nutrient Content of Selected Mixed Dishes on a 100 gram Basis with Per Cent Agreement Between Calculated Recipes and Two Food Composition Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 6. Average Daily Calorie and Nutrient Intake of Preschool Children Ages 2%-6 in Nine Western Michigan Day Care Centers . . . . . 48 7. Per Cent Calories, Protein and Overall Nutrient Intake Average of Preschool Children Contri- buted by Meals and Snacks at Nine Western Michigan Day Care Centers. Bottom Part Shows Comparison of this Between Centers Serving Two Meals and Those Serving One . . . . . 49 8. Food Group Composition of Lunch Menus for Five Days at Eight Western Michigan Day Care centers 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O 50 9. Total Number, Average Age, 3-month Height Increments, and 3-month Weight Increments of Preschool Girls and Boys Attending Six Western Michigan Day Care Centers . . . . . 53 10. Day Care Center Sample Menus . . . . . . . 89 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Comparison of average daily caloric intake of preschool children in nine Western Michigan day care centers with the Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDA) . . . . . . . 54 2. Comparison of average daily protein intake of preschool children in nine Western Michigan day care centers with the Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDA) . . . . . . . 55 3. Comparison of average daily calcium intake of preschool children in nine Western Michigan day care centers with the Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDA) . . . . . . . 56 4. Comparison of average daily iron intake of preschool children in nine Western Michigan day care centers with the Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDA) . . . . . . . 57 5. Comparison of average daily vitamin A intake of preschool children in nine Western Michigan day care centers with the Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDA) . . . . . . . 58 6. Comparison of average daily thiamin intake of preschool children in nine Western Michigan day care centers with the Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDA) . . . . . . . 59 7. Comparison of average daily riboflavin intake of preschool children in nine Western Michigan day care centers with the Recom- mended Dietary Allowances (RDA). . . . . 60 8. Comparison of average daily niacin intake of preschool children in nine Western Michigan day care centers with the Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDA) . . . . . . . 61 vi Figure Page 9. Comparison of average daily ascorbic acid intake of preschool children in nine Western Michigan day care centers with the Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDA). . 62 10. Comparison of 3-month height and weight incre- ments of preschool children, average age 4 years, in 6 Western Michigan day care centers with an average of increments recommended by Simmons (1944), Simmons & Todd (1938), Watson & Lowrey (1967) & Jackson & Kelly (1945) for children of the sanle age 0 O O O O O O O O O O 63 vii CHAPTER I REVIEW OF LITERATURE Day Care History Although there has been a sharp increase in day care facilities for children in the last five or six years, they have existed in this country for more than one hundred years (Juhas, 1970). It was the state of Massa- chusetts that first showed concern for the care and protection of low-income children and, subsequently, the first child develOpment nursery schools in college and university settings were established. Since the early decades of this century, these experimental nursery schools have been used for research in child and human development (HEW, 1968a). The Work Projects Administration (WPA) in the 1930's and the Lanham program of World War II were two national programs which involved group day care of large numbers of children (HEW, 1968a). Both programs placed major emphasis on providing child care for employed women in contrast to Project Head Start, initiated in the sixties, which concentrated on the developmental aspects of the children. The proliferation of day care centers was a natural outgrowth of Head Start. Prior to this time, day care centers were stereotyped for the poor while nursery schools were for the well-to-do (HEW, 1968a). Ruderman (1968) explained that day care centers were viewed as a service to the deprived where special emphasis had to be placed on the child's adjustment and emotional development as well as the family's social and emotional problems. She contrasted these with the nursery schools which provided social and educational experiences and were a potential benefit to the more advantaged children from middle class homes rather than a reflection of the inadequacy on the part of the family. This differentiation from nursery schools was also spelled out in the 1960 edition of the Child Welfare League of America's Standards for Day Care Service (CWLA, 1960): Day care service has to be differentiated from the nursery school or kindergarten, and from extended school services and other programs for school-age children offered as part of elementary school systems. These have education of young children as their main purpose. The primary purpose of a day care service is the care and protection of children. This pur- pose, the reasons for which a child and family may need it, and the responsibility shared with parents distinguish a day care service from education programs. These 1960 standards state the primary purpose of day care as follows: The primary purpose of a day care service dis- tinguishing it from other resources for family and children, is to care for and protect children. In contrast to this set of standards are the revised standards of 1969 (CWLA, 1969) which state: The primary purpose of a day care service is to supplement the care and protection that the child receives from his parents. In addition, the revised version specifies that day care programs include the essential components of care, protection, education, health supervision, social work, parent participation, and planning and coordination. Consequently, it is apparent that day care is now recognized as a supplementary service for the parents which should be developed and carried out in such a way as to maintain a stable family environment for the children. It should stress not only care and protection, but also deve10pment and education. Present Differences Between Danyare Centers and Nursery Schools With the latter point in mind, one can see that the once distinct dividing line between nursery schools and day care centers is rapidly diminishing to the point that there are probably two basic differences today. The first difference concerns their goals. Although both nursery schools and day care centers now stress develOpment and education, this is still the major goal of nursery schools whereas day care centers are equally concerned with the supplementary care and protection of the child. A second more specific difference lies in the educational qualifications of the staff. In Michigan the head teacher of a nursery school must meet the educational qualifications as established by the Michi- gan Department of Education (State of Mich., 1968) and all assistant teachers should have a minimum of two years of study at the college level. The director of a day care center, on the other hand, shall have a minimum of two years of study at the college level, and all other staff members should have some experience in working with children. Factors Influencing Danyare Develgpment One might ask what has promoted this shift in outlook during the sixties from scarce recognition of day care to the creation of a prosperous movement in which demand greatly exceeds the capacity to serve. The factors responsible for this change can be divided into four major categories. Probably the greatest impact has come from the first of these, namely, the tremendous increase in the number of working mothers. Working Mothers.--It is felt that one of the primary reasons day care centers did not develOp more rapidly in earlier years is the fear that more women would be tempted to seek work outside of the home if these centers were available to care for their children (Caldwell, 1971). But statistics reveal that more mothers have started working despite the lack of day care centers. Since 1940 the number of working mothers has increased more than sixfold and has more than doubled since 1950 (U.S. Dept. of Labor, 1967). There are more than five million children in this country under six years of age with working mothers (HEW, 1970), yet according to 1968 statistics, there are licensed day care facilities for only 637,000 of these children (U.S. Dept. of Labor, 1969). It is estimated that there will be a 43 per cent increase between 1970 and 1980 in the number of working mothers, ages 20-44, with children under the age of five (U.S. Dept. of Labor, 1969). In 1965 the U.S. Department of Labor investigated how children of working mothers were cared for during the day (Low, et al., 1968). This study involved 6.3 million mothers who had worked 27 weeks or more in 1964 and their 12.3 million children under the age of 14. The results of the survey indicated that: a. 46% of the children were cared for in their own homes usually by another relative. b. 16% were cared for away from home. c. 13% were watched by their own mothers during work. d. 15% had mothers who worked only during their school hours. e. 8% cared for themselves and were, thus, called latch-key children; of those children, less than 4% were under the age of six. f. 2% attended group care centers. Factors affecting the increase in working_mothers.-- Three main reasons for the increase in working mothers in. contemporary times include: 1. recent acceptance of the fact that a woman will not be abandoning her parental responsibilities or showing a lack of concern for her children if she chooses to work outside her home (Emerson, 1969), 2. the rising cost of living plus higher economic aspirations both of which demand a higher income need and thus are reSponsible for a greater number of women in the labor force (Linden, 1970) and 3. the idea that a middle class, well-educated mother who feels she must stay home may be depriving the community of the benefit of her skills as well as depriving her child of the stimulation offered by other children and professional educators (Stern, 1969). .Work Incentive Program.--A second major factor which is responsible for the recent day care movement is the Work Incentive Program (WIN) authorized under the 1967 amendments to the Social Security Act and operative since 1968 (U.S. Dept. of Labor, 1969). This is a manpower develOpment program to train persons on welfare for perma- nent jobs at decent pay. The law specifies that day care services must be provided for children whose mothers are participating in these training programs. Socio-economicL cultural, and health factors.—-A third reason day care has shown such expanded develOpment is due to increased awareness of the existence of such conditions as physical or mental handicaps of the children or parents, illness or death of the mother, economical and cultural deprivation, poor family relationships, slum living conditions with no place to play, and socially and intellectually impoverished environments at home (U.S. Dept. of Labor, 1967, 1969; HEW, 1968b). Importance of child develgpment.--Finally, there is recognition of the fact that the first few years of a child's life are the critically formative ones and, there- fore, provision should be made for optimum deveIOpment of all who might otherwise be deprived (HEW, 1968a). Nutritional Patterns of Preschool Children Effects of Poor Nutrition on Growth and Development Poor nutrition can be in the form of either under- nutrition or malnutrition or both. According to Lowenberg, et al. (1968), undernutrition is getting too few calories to maintain normal body weight and normal activity, whereas malnutrition may involve adequate calories but insufficient, or in some cases, excess amounts of certain needed nutrients. Since adequate nutrition is a prerequisite for prOper growth and develOpment in the child, these states of poor nutrition may have profound effects on the child's physical and mental develOpment. 8 Physical growth and development.--Almost any kind of nutritional deficiency including calories, protein, vitamins and minerals can result in growth retardation (Pearson, 1968). A sensitive indicator of undernutrition in the young child is the failure to thrive and the children who do grow in spite of this undernutrition are smaller than well-nourished children of the same age (Lowenberg, et al., 1968). In a study on nutrition and growth, McCance and Widdowson (1960) found that rats undernourished during suckling continued, upon subsequent unlimited feeding, to gain weight less rapidly than their controls and they remained smaller and lighter throughout life. Winick and Noble (1966) also found that caloric restriction of rats from birth to weaning resulted in decreased growth due to curtailment of cell division. Subsequent recovery did not occur with refeeding. Rats restricted between 21 and 42 days of age showed decreased growth with recovery upon refeeding occurring only in the brain and lung, the two organs growing by cell enlarge- ment at this time rather than cell division. A restric- tion between 65 and 86 days of age, when growth is primarily characterized by cell enlargement, caused reduced cell size but subsequent recovery did result upon refeeding. It was concluded that permanent stunting results from reduction in cell number but growth recovery will occur after a reduction in cell size. A later study by these same researchers (Winick & Noble, 1967) demonstrated the reverse response with increased feeding in neonatal rats. Increasing the number of calories accelerated growth by increasing the rate of cell division. At weaning these rats were sig- nificantly heavier than their controls, their organs were composed of a larger number of cells, and their increased weight was maintained in adulthood. Schemmel, et a1. (1969), however, found that overfeeding of rats by using a high fat diet from 21 days of age resulted in increased weight due to an increase in fat only. There was no increase in lean body mass in rats fed the high fat diet as compared to their controls fed a grain ration. The work done by Berg, et a1. (1960) raises some questions as to the desirability of increased growth.with increased nutrition. They found that rats given restricted amounts of food from 28 days of age showed increased lon- gevity and delayed onset of disease as compared to the controls fed ad libitum. Two malnutrition syndromes prevalent in many children throughout the world are marasmus and kwashiorkor. Marasmus is partial starvation or a chronic calorie defi- ciency whereas kwashiorkor is a form of protein-calorie 10 malnutrition (Lowenberg, et al., 1968). Marasmus, which is more common in children below one year of age, is primarily characterized by retardation in growth and development, muscular wasting, and lack of subcutaneous fat. Kwashiorkor is more prevalent during the second and third years and is characterized by edema, growth retardation, variable degree of dermatosis and muscular wasting (Scrimshaw, et al., 1961). Mental development.--Coursin (1965) indicates that it is often difficult to obtain meaningful data in evalu- ating mental ability because of such factors as genetic background; family, environmental, and cultural circum- stances; time of onset of undernutrition; degree of its severity and duration; adequacy of treatment; subsequent environment, etc. To study the effects of early malnutrition on mental function, Champakam, et a1. (1968) compared the intelligence and sensory development test performance of 19 children who had previously been successfully treated for kwashiorkor with that of a properly matched control group. Performance was poorer in the experimental group with a significant difference in intelligence test performance. For both tests differences tended to dimin- ish with age. Cabak and Najdanvic (1965) also showed lower intelligence scores for children who had had marasmus l 11 in childhood. Fifty per cent of these children were below the normal intelligence limit as compared to 21 per cent of the control children. Kugelmass, et a1. (1944) administered two intelli- gence tests to two groups of children, each group consisting of both mentally retarded and normal children but those in group 1 had been malnourished at the time of the first test and well-nourished at the second, whereas the children in group 2 were well-nourished throughout. In group 1 there was a 10 point rise on the second test for the retarded children and an 18 point rise for the normal children compared to an average zero change for group 2 retarded children and -.09 change for the normal children. Using height-for-age as the basis for defining malnutrition and a group of children from a rural village where diet was poor, Cravioto, et a1. (1966) compared the shortest-for-age and tallest-for-age children with respect to ability to integrate visual, haptic, and kinesthetic information. The children retarded in height-for-age performed significantly poorer than the taller children. No differences were reflected in a group of upper class children of the same age range which was selected as the control. Of the various background variables investigated in relation to the child's height, only mother's educa- tional level showed a positive relationship. Therefore, the authors suggested that interference with the child's 12 physical growth and intersensory development was not from a difference in social background but rather from malnutri- tion itself. In a later study Cravioto, et al. (1967) investigated the ability of children to integrate auditory and visual stimuli, again using height—for—age as an indicator of malnutrition. Mean performance of the taller group was higher than that of the shorter, but integration improved with age for all the children. Nutrient Intake of Preschool Children During the preschool years growth proceeds at a slower rate than during the first two years of life, but increasing emphasis is placed on maturation and develop- ment (Beal, 1954). This change may be reflected in emotional behavior as well as variation in eating patterns (Beal, 1955). Beal (1953, 1954, 1955, 1956) found that both appetite and nutrient intake varied in healthy children from upper middle class families between birth and the age of five. The median daily intakes of all nutrients increased during the first year to year and a half of life. Between the ages of one and three, the median intakes varied: calorie, fat, carbohydrate and niacin intakes continued to increase slightly; protein, thiamin and ascorbic acid intakes leveled off to a plateau; and calcium, phosphorus, iron, riboflavin, vitamin A, and vitamin D intakes decreased. 13 From ages three to five the median intakes for all nutri- ents again increased with the exception of vitamin D which continued to decrease. These intake patterns reflected to a great extent the change in eating patterns of these children during their preschool years. It was found that there was a marked decrease between the ages of one and three in the consump-. tion of milk and vegetables, which was reflected in the decreased intakes of calcium, phosphorus, riboflavin, vitamin D and vitamin A. Iron intakes were largely a reflection of the iron added to specially prepared baby foods which accounted for the increase during the first year of life and subsequent decrease when family foods were introduced. Median daily intakes of all nutrients except iron and niacin either met or exceeded the Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDA) for children of this age. Although niacin and iron intakes were low relative to the RDA, there were no deficiency symptoms apparent in the children in either case. Diercks, et al. (1965) found the mean total intake for calories, protein, iron, vitamin A, thiamin, riboflavin, calcium, and ascorbic acid for 115 preschool children studied were close to the RDA except for niacin. A sub- stantial number of individual intakes were low in iron and ascorbic acid. Kerrey, et al. (1968) also found that 14 mean daily intakes of 40 preschool children from two dif- ferent socio-economic groups either met or exceeded the RDA for all nutrients except iron and calories. Many individual children, however, were low in iron, calcium, calories, and ascorbic acid consumption. Similarly, Metheny, et a1. (1962) found that the least supplied nutrients in diets of 104 preschool children were, in decreasing order, calcium, calories, thiamin, and iron. Ascorbic acid was often low in individual intakes. In agreement with this latter study were the findings of Crumrine and Fryer (1970) which showed that iron intakes of 40 preschool children were the lowest followed by calories, calcium, and thiamin yet all nutrients were close to the RDA except iron. In these studies there appeared to be universal agreement that iron was the nutrient most often low in the diets of preschool children. Other nutrients often supplied in the least amounts were calcium, thiamin, niacin, ascorbic acid, and calories. Importance of Snacks Because children frequently cannot eat a great deal of food at one time, it has been found beneficial to serve snacks to preschool children in addition to their regular meals. These prevent the children from becoming overly hungry between meals and provide extra energy. In 15 studying the effect of midmorning snacks on lunch appetites, Munro (1957) found that the average caloric intake at lunch decreased but total caloric intake for both snack and lunch increased for the majority of the children. Eppright, et al. (1970) noted in their North Central Regional Study that snacks were just as frequent as meals in the diets of preschool children and they deserved as much emphasis as meals in nutrition education. They also found that eating less than four times a day negatively affected caloric intake, whereas it was positively affected by eating six or more times a day. Recommendations for Nutrition in Dainare Centers Although studies have not been conducted on the role of nutrition in day care centers, various recommenda- tions have been put forth as a guide for nutrition in group care of children, particularly day care centers. The Michigan Department of Public Health (1970) recom- mended that children in group care from five to eight hours a day should have one-third to one—half of their daily nutrient needs met at the center. Therefore, this must be provided through one regular meal and one or two snacks. Children in group care longer than eight hours a day should receive two-thirds of their daily nutrient needs at the center. This can be provided by two regular meals and one or two snacks. Hille (1969) has set forth 16 similar recommendations for feeding groups of young children cared for during the day. Similar meal patterns for feeding young children have been devised by various groups (MDPH, 1970; Hille, 1969; USDA, 1970). These suggest foods to be included in each meal and snack and differ only in slight respects. The U. S. Department of Agriculture (1970) specifies inclusion of milk and an enriched bread component in every meal and snack served at the center, whereas the patterns by Hille (1969) and the Michigan Department of Public Health (1970) do not make this specification. They do, however, recommend that a good Vitamin C source be served daily and a good vitamin A source be served at least twice a week. Considerations in Preschool Group Feeding Situations Food preferences.-—Food preferences become very apparent in children during their preschool years, and there appears to be wide agreement that vegetables are the least liked foods. Beal (1953) found a marked decrease in the consumption of vegetables and milk between the ages of one and three. In studying food intake of nursery school children for the noon meal, Merone, et al. (1965) found that vegetables, excluding potatoes were consumed in the smallest amounts and desserts were consumed in largest amounts. In a questionnaire in which mothers 17 indicated the child's food preferences, Diercks, et al. (1965) found that vegetables were the most disliked or not eaten at all, whereas meats were most liked as were fruits, sweets, cereals, and cereal products. Similarly, Eppright, et a1. (1969) found from an interview with mothers of preschool children that by the age of three many children had developed a dislike for certain foods, most notably vegetables. They also noted a sharp decrease in milk consumption after the age of six months which also corresponds with Beal's (1953) findings. Introduction of new foods.--The eating situation is a learning experience for the child and at the same time carries along with it an emotional impact (HEW, 1968a). Foods which are familiar to a child will be much more acceptable to him than new foods. Therefore, Wagner (1954) has suggested acquainting the child with the new food before it is prepared and then introducing it with familiar and well-liked foods at the mealtime. Breckenridge and Murphy (1969) feel the introduction of a new food is a learning experience. Through repeated experimentation they feel children will learn to accept new foods. Foods as rewards or punishments.--Hille (1969) stresses that withholding desserts as punishment or giving desserts as rewards only serves to place exaggerated importance on these foods. In order to avoid this problem, Wagner (1954) has noted that desserts in her nursery school 18 have been planned as a nutritional part of the meal and have thus been served with the meal and second servings have been permitted. Self—selection of diet.--Eppright, et al. (1969) have concluded from their study that about half the children who enter school have had little experience in making decisions about food selection. Therefore, it appears that during the preschool years a child should be given the freedom of some choice in the amounts and types of foods he eats. Because of the variation in a child's appetite from day to day, Wagner (1954) feels that a process of modified self-selection for preschool children would be most advantageous. In this manner a child may select the types and amounts of foods he desires but the adult controls the variety of foods which are presented. Attitudes.--Finally, a very important factor in the feeding of young children is the attitudes of these children and the influence of the environment on their formation. It is generally felt that a relaxed nonpressured atmosphere is important in helping a child develop healthy attitudes about food and mealtimes (Wagner, 1954). Metheny, et al. (1962) have stated that a child's attitude toward food at home may differ from his attitude toward food in a group-eating situation. This could possibly be explained by a relaxed atmosphere in the group which may not be as 19 apparent in the home, or vice versa. Likewise, it has been noted that "problem eaters" often disappear in the relaxed atmosphere where everybody eats (HEW, 1969). Nutritional Status of Preschool Children Height and Weight as Indicators In assessing the nutritional status of children, appraisal of growth and development in relation to age and sex is of great importance. Height and weight, in addition to skinfold thickness, are the most commonly used anthropometric measurements in children to determine growth and development (Pearson, 1968). Krogman (1948) notes that there is considerable variation in "normal" human growth in general but with the exception of a few cases, this variation follows an orderly progress within an expected range. The few excep- tions may be partially explained by such factors as heredity, food and health habits and health vicissitudes. Bayer and Bayley (1959) relate growth in height to the rate of physical maturing. They indicate that most children mature and grow in a similar pattern but their rates of maturing may vary greatly. Simmons and Todd (1938) further indicate that increments of stature (height) register true body growth whereas weight changes are more nearly an indication of health. 20 In considering weight as an indicator of nutri- tional status, there are conflicting ideas. Watson and Lowrey (1967) feel that body weight is probably the best index of nutrition and growth because it sums up all the increments in size. They do, however, recognize the extraneous factors which enter into its determination. These factors have been listed by Krogman (1948) as. (a) time of day, (b) before or after meals, exercise or elimination, (c) season of year, (d) socioeconomic status, and (e) health, nutrition, body build, ethnic stock and family line. It is because of factors such as these that Simmons and Todd (1938) emphasize that weight cannot be as reliable or as valid an indicator of growth as stature until it becomes possible to distinguish weight as a true reflection of growth from weight as a reflection of other factors. Hundley, et a1. (1955) studied.'Ume reliability of height and weight measurements as a continuing index of the nutritional status of school children. Data were obtained for first—grade children from both favorable and underprivileged areas during the depression era and pre- and post-control periods of economic prosperity. Children from economically favored areas were taller and heavier than the children from underprivileged areas, but the latter group showed no change in its secular growth trend during the depression era whereas the former 21 group did show significant deviation. Due to other inde— pendent variables which may have influenced the results, it was concluded that further study should be done to test the reliability of these measurements. Methods of Expressing Height and Weight Heights and weights in determining the nutritional status of children can be used in a number of ways. Among these ways are the use of tables, curves, or grids; deter- mination of growth increment; and determination of develop- mental age. Height-weight tables.--Various tables (Watson & Lowrey, 1967) have been developed to present sex-age-height data and sex-age-weight data. These tables are usually based on means or percentiles of a large number of children and are used to compare a child's own height and weight with the norm at his particular age. Watson and Lowrey (1967) enumerate several objections to the use of these tables: (1) there is a question as to what extent devia- tions from mean figures must occur to be considered abnormal; (2) deviations are apt to be overlooked unless there are excessive deviations from the usual physique; (3) with these tables it is more difficult to compare a child's progress than it is with graphic representations. Nevertheless, because these tables are a convenient standard, they are widely used. 22 'Height-weight curves.--Curves for height and weight, like tables, are usually derived from averages of large numbers of children at each age. These curves (Bayer & Bayley, 1959; Jackson & Kelly, 1945) have an advantage over tables in that they allow comparison of an individual's pattern of growth with that of a large group of his own age. Children with accelerated development will show curves higher than the average and likewise, children showing retarded development will fall below the average curve (Bayer & Bayley, 1959). Height-weight grids.--The third method of appraisal is by the Wetzel Grid (Wetzel, 1943) which Krogman (1948) feels is the best present device available. By simply plotting heights and weights on the grid, one is able to estimate the physical condition of children. Two major steps are involved in this technique of appraisal. The first is the evaluation of physical status which includes physique, developmental level and nutritional grade; this evaluation applies to each individual point plotted from the height and weight data. The second step is evaluation of physiCal progress as defined by channel course, which indicates if changes in physique are accompanying develop- ment, and auxodrome progress which shows whether a child's development is progressing on schedule. This step applies to the curves which are drawn through the plotted points. pl :1 23 The greatest advantage of this Grid method is the ability to detect a developmental lag characterized in Wetzel's terms by "drifting off" in the channel course and "behind schedule" in auxodrome progress (Wetzel, 1943). In this way one is forewarned of oncoming malnu— trition which cannot be detected by height and weight tables or clinical means. Height-weight increment.--Increments in height and weight are another way to measure a child's progress in growth and development. These increments can be deter- mined by taking the difference between heights and weights at successive age levels. Robinow (1942) feels these are particularly beneficial for following the progress of children over shorter periods of time so he undertook a study to establish norms for weight and length increments during successive intervals from birth to six years of age. It was found that the rate of growth in both height and weight decelerates rapidly throughout the first year, slowly decreases from one to two years of age, and from two to six years of age weight increments remain practi- cally constant while length increments continue to decrease. Bayer and Bayley (1959) note the importance of increment curves in determining whether a child's slow and fast growth periods are occurring at the expected times. 24 Developmental age and index.--Developmental age (Drash, et al., 1968) expresses in terms of age an indi— vidual's state of development as he relates to a standard population and can be used for any anthropometric charac- teristic which varies predictably with age and for which certain standards have been set for children at various ages. Specifically in reference to height and weight, the develOpmental age is the height age and weight age, respectively. Height age expresses an individual's height as the age at which his height is equivalent to the mean of a standard pOpulation. Weight age is expressed in a similar fashion. As a further step, developmental index can be obtained by dividing developmental age by chro- nological age. Therefore, a value of one would indicate normal develOpment, less than one retarded development, and greater than one accelerated development. CHAPTER II INTRODUCTION Because day care is still in relatively early stages of development, studies on preschool nutrition have not yet been conducted in this specific area. On the basis that there is an increasing need for day care for preschool children (U.S. Dept. of Labor, 1967; 1969; HEW, 1970; Low, et al., 1968), that nutrition plays a crucial role in the development of children during this period of life (Winick & Noble, 1966; 1967; McCance & Widdowson, 1960; Champakam, et al., 1968; Cabak & Najdanvic, 1967; Kugelmass, et al., 1944; Cravioto, et al., 1967), and that preschool children exhibit many changes in eating patterns and attitudes (Beal, 1953; 1954; 1955; 1956) which-can be influenced by their environment (Wagner, 1954; Metheny, et al., 1962; HEW, 1969), a study on the nutritional adequacy of the food served at day care centers is justified. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate nutrient intake of preschool children at nine day care centers. Nutrient intake was compared with height and weight increments of the children over a three-month period. In addition, for each participating day care center, descriptive factors concerning general 25 26 operations, menu planning and food service practices were noted. CHAPTER III METHODS Selection and Description of Sample Through the cooperation of the day care consultant for Western Michigan day care centers, ten day care centers in Western Michigan were selected for the study on the basis of location, expected cooperation, full-day program availability, and participant or non-participant in the USDA Special Food Service Program for Children (USDA, 1970). Midway in the study one day care center was informed it would be closing permanently due to lack of funding and attendance was drOpping rapidly as a result. This center was, therefore, eliminated from the study as it would not have been representative of the on-going day care centers and the number of children would have been very small. Table 1 summarizes descriptive information about each of the nine day care centers. Of these, one each was located in Newaygo, Muskegon, Grand Haven, Holland, and Portage and four in Kalamazoo. All centers provided full-day programs, although some of the children attended on a part-time basis at six of the day care centers. Six of the nine centers were participants in the USDA Special Food Service Program for Children. 27 28 Food Intakes Preliminary Study A preliminary study on individual food intakes was conducted prior to this study at one day care center for five consecutive days. Due to the limited capability of observing many individual children at one time as well as the risk of absences from day to day, it was decided that determination of average intake from several centers for a two-day period would be more beneficial than deter- mination of a few individual intakes at fewer centers for longer periods of time. Initial Planning Two observation dates for each day care center were set for the six-week period between the middle of March and end of April. These dates involved two con- secutive days at three centers, one day in-between at three centers, a weekend in-between at two centers, and two days plus a weekend in-between at one center. Collection of Menus Menus for the two observation dates at each day care center were obtained ahead of time for seventeen of the eighteen days for the purpose of observing how closely the menus were followed. In addition, extra menus were requested to determine whether the meals served during the study were typical for each day care center. 29 Weighing of Food The total quantity of each food prepared for a snack or a meal was weighed with its container to i 0.5 ounces on a Hanson household scale. This weight was corrected for the weight of the container and any food remaining in the serving dish. When the plates were scraped, the individual foods that were uneated were put onto separate plates to determine the weight of wastage for each. Spilled foods were also collected and weighed. The total weight of food served was corrected for these wastes; the resulting values represented the total'weight of food eaten by all the children. The average weight of food eaten by each individual child was then determined by dividing the weight of the total food consumed by the number of children eating the meal or snack (see Table 2). No food eaten by the staff was included in these weights. Analysis of Data Average daily intakes for calories, protein, fat, carbohydrate, calcium, vitamin A, iron, thiamin, riboflavin, niacin and ascorbic acid for all meals and snacks served at each day care center were calculated using the food composition tables. Watt & Merrill (1963) was used for those foods appearing therein; otherwise Church & Church (1969) was used. For food items not listed in the tables, recipes were either obtained from the cooks or cookbooks (Rombauer, et al., 1967; Better Homes and Gardens New Cookbook, 1968; Junior Welfare League, 1964), and 30 nutritive composition of individual ingredients was calcu- lated using the food tables by Watt & Merrill (1963). Niacin equivalents were calculated using the tryptophan values for each food given by Church and Church (1969) and for those foods not listed, 1.4 per cent tryptophan was figured for proteins of animal origin and 1.0 per cent for proteins of vegetable origin (Food and Nutr. Bd., 1968). For each day an allowance of 135 mg. tryptophan was sub— tracted for its requirement1 and for the remaining amount 60 mg. of tryptophan were converted to one mg. of niacin. Average daily intakes for calories and the nutrients listed were compared to the 1968 Recommended Dietary Allow- ances (RDA) and the portion of these allowances which day care centers were recommended to provide. The Michigan Department of Public Health (1970) recommended that day care centers provide l/3-l/2 of the child's RDA if he attended 5 to 8 hours daily (one regular meal and one or two snacks) and 2/3 of his daily RDA if he attended more than 8 hours a day (two regular meals and one or two snacks). The RDA for children ages 3-4 and 4-6 were averaged to obtain the most representative standard for this group of children. Percentage of total intake 1Reynolds (1957) has suggested 500mg. of tryptophan as a safe allowance to meet the daily needs of tryptophan in young men. Therefore, using the RDA for protein as a basis for conversion, the allowance was calculated for preschool children and 1/2-2/3 of this value was used in the calculations for day care centers. 31 contributed by snacks and meals was calculated for each day care center and compared between centers serving two meals and those serving one. Any vitamin supplements given to the children at the day care centers were not included in the dietary intakes. Heights and Weights Procedure A total of 159 children in seven day care centers were measured and weighed (see Table 3) twice during the duration of this study--once in February or early March and again in May. Data were not collected for both of these times at two centers so they were eliminated from this aspect of the study. Weights were recorded to the nearest half pound when possible and heights to the nearest eighth inch. The first set of data was collected by a staff member of each day care center while the second set was collected by the researcher at six of the centers and by a staff member at the remaining center. Analysis of Data Three-month height and weight increments were determined for each child by subtracting the first set of data from the second set. Average age and average height and weight increment were determined for both 32 boys and girls at each day care center. An average was taken of increments suggested by Simmons (1944), Simmons & Todd (1938), Watson & Lowrey (1967), and Jackson & Kelly (1945) for the average age of the children and compared to actual data obtained. Hemoglobin Data Hemoglobin data were available from records at the two day care centers for children of low income families. These were obtained for 62 children at the one center and 12 children at the other and were compared with levels suggested by the Interdepartmental Committee on Nutrition for National Defense (1963). 33 .xomcm coocumuwm no“ ummoxm Hmucmo mcu um cofiumumm Iona poem wmwfiwumuco 0c mm3 wnmcu om cocouflx Hmuucmo m Eouu H Hmucmu cu aw.pwumumo mm3 poem HHfiuum xafimc as mocmEMONHmm Haws» sue: mocmpuooom cs xmp mnu unocm50ucu haamUHpoflumm cmupaflco wnu ou cm>flm mum: mUOOw ucosmouOMCHmu m uwucmu ad .xpsum wnu mocwm pmscfiucoumflp coon mm; pcm HmucwEHuwaxm mm3 xomcm .E.m may 0 umucwu uém .mflwmn wEMuuuumm m :0 popcmuuw cwucaflco umOE «cue: mhmucwu umm .w:0>uw>m an possmcoo cwumo umOE Hams wnu mm3 menu mocam cucsa mum 0:3 coupawzo uo Hmnssc Ou mumumu magma aw wsam> .>mp some usocwsounu can xmp Cu map Eouu pmfium> xpsuw wcu CM mcflummflofluumm cmupawno mo Hones: Hmsuod coucawcu mo Monfidz muwcowmu xomcm .E.Q mm» >2 owned gonna mHm>wH mooummz zuom w-m~ om om hm H loud mwumam ummwxmmum Ham mucwEmUHOWCAmu oz x000 xn comma xomcm.E.Q mHm>wH mwoummz Hash mlwm mm mm mm m long mmumam :UCSA Ham mmuecz xomcm .E¢.xmz oz xafiEmm .E.Qa.E.m mmm>ma moonmmz cuom mimm mm on ooa o cocoa HHm mwuflzz . xomcm mm» mafiEmm .E.dw.E.m mam>ma wwouowz :uom wnxm om ovumm. me u nocsg Ham mwuwnz xomcm mm» sHHEMH .e.ma.s.m mHm>wH mmuwcz cuom m-x~ «a ma om m conga Ham . xomCm mm» >Hfi5mm .s.aa.e.m mHm>mH mmuflcz nuom muxm mm ~m-o~ oo a guess .Ham . xUMCm.E.Qa.E.m E4.xmz oz xaflemm £0254 mecca“ mmoumwz Hana mnmm am mm mm o unnuxmwum 30H mmuflcz mwanmu xum:m .E.Q .Ed.xmz mm» um coca 20:34 mam>oH wmouowz Luca muxm mm mm me Q pw>umm x000 ammuxmmum Ham mwuwzx xomcm.E.Qa.E.m .E4.xwz mm» x000 an pmumm gonna mEoocfi mwoummz Hank mlxm mm omuhv ow d uwua moumam ummmxmwum 30H mwuwcz . .ucum voow>uwm mmxomcm Hm>mq NmEHa couvafinu angum cw mew ommuw>< pmaaoucm noucmu nwufiuunm no can uflfiocooo mmsouo upumm mo H luwmwowaumm Sawmo ouau damn oawum mama: aofloom oflccum no madam momfl >mo .coupnwno onwummflUfiuumm onu can muoucwo mumo mac advance: shoumo3 flaw: no codumuuouwnll.d manda 34 TABLE 2.--Total number of preschool children eating meals and snacks during a two-day study at each of nine Western Michigan day care centers. Center Day Breakfast A.M. Snack Lunch P.M. Snack A 1 51 51 51 51 2 53 53 53 53 B 1 23 -- 28 21 2 24 -- 29 26 c1 1 18 18 18 -- 2 20 21 21 5 D 1 —- 25 21 19 2 -- 25 25 14 E 1 -- 8 14 11 2 —- 11 13 9 F 1 -- 33 36 32 2 -- 32 34 33 G 1 -- 55 55 55 2 -- 47 50 53 H2 1 -- 23 22 23 2 -- 20 19 20 1 1 10 -- 16 17 2 17 -- 20 18 1 The low and zero number for P.M. snack is due to the fact that children were allowed to go home early on Mondays and Fridays only, the two days the study was conducted, and very few, if any, were present for snack. 2A.M. snacks were not served but figures indicate total number of children receiving reinforcement foods periodi— cally, at regular intervals, throughout the day. 35 .mfifiu comm mmamom accumMMAo N .mmfiflu noon moamom mEmmH cues Nmoamom Eoounumm mamcmauu cop003 w musmmmE mama .E.m Honoummmmm palm gun: mmflmom soougumm u--- u- umcomme mm.maum m usocuwz mmmamom Eooucpmm mHmCMHHu cop003 w ousmome mane .E.m Honoumomom omlm usosuwz mmflmom Eoounpmm Hmasu a musmmmE mama .E.m Hmcomoe Hum m SUNS Nmmamom Eoounumm mamcmauu c0p003 a ousmmofi mama .E.m Honoumommm omam nuflz mmamow EOOH£pmm mam:mauu :0p003 w ousmmme mama .E.m Hmcomoe Hum m - Spflz Hmmamom Eooucumm madamauw £06003 2 wuswmoE mama .E.m Hozoummmwm malm LDHB wmaoom Eoonsamm mamcmwuu :mp003 w ousmmmE mama .E.m Honomoe mHnm o udocuflz Hmmaoom Eooucumm mHmCMHHu :06003 a ousmmmfi mama .&.m Honommmmmm balm unocuflz mmamom Eooucumm madameuu :0©003 a musmmmfi mums .E.m Honomme calm U cuwz Hmwamom Soonsumm onQMHHu 200003 a muommws mama .E.m Honoummmmm malm naflz mmamom Eoounumm camouflup cocoo3 a ousmmoe mama .E.m Hmcomoe NHIN m saws Hmmamom HMOHpoZ Hmuommmfi maoom Hm0flomz .E.m onusz balm d cuflz mmamom Havana: Housmmmfi mamom Hmowooz .E.m mmusz omnm mmocm mucmwwz_ mucmfimm moo Hoaooaaov mmumo “mucoo usocuwz H0 saw: pom: uaofidnpmcH m0 mafia mumo moo .mumucmo wumo amp cmmflcoflz cuwummz mafia cfl coupawno Hoocomoum H0“ mump ucmfim3 cam “swam: mawuomaaoo CH poms mmuspoooum m0 mcflausoln.m mamme CHAPTER IV RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Nutrient Intake Agreement Between Food Tables and Recipes Since both Watt & Merrill (1963) and Church & Church (1969) were used for calculation of the nutrient content of the foods ingested by the children, a comparison of the nutrient content of 100 gram portions of representative foods from various food groups as given in the two food composition books was done (Table 4). For single food items, there was 100 per cent agreement whereas for mixed food items such as fruit cocktail, agreement between the two books ranged from 20 per cent to 100 per cent for the individual nutrients. However, the low value of 20 per cent agreement for ascorbic acid in fruit cocktail may be misleading since the content of this vitamin was so low in one and not very high in the other. Therefore, for this study using the two books in order to locate the published nutrient value of most food items was justi- fiable. Similarly, data in Table 5 for mixed dishes, although not in as good agreement as for single food items, would justify the use of the food composition 36 37 table either for the recipe as such, if given, or the nutrient content of the single food items contained in the recipe. Calculated Data Calculated values for average caloric and nutrient intake of the children ranging in age from 2 1/2 to 6 years for both days in all nine day care centers as well as the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) for that age group for calories and each nutrient are given in Table 6. The table also includes a breakdown into percentages of each nutrient which, according to the Michigan Department of Public Health (1970), should be served each day to each child dependent upon the total hours in daily attendance for that child. Graphic presentation of these data is shown in Figures 1-9. Average intakes either met or exceeded 2/3 of the RDA for riboflavin (Figure 7) and protein (Figure 2) for half or more of the 18 days; 1/2 the RDA for calcium (Figure 3), vitamin A (Figure 5), niacin equivalent (Figure 8) and ascorbic acid (Figure 9); 1/3 the RDA for calories (Figure l) and thiamin (Figure 6) and fell below 1/3 the RDA for iron (Figure 4). The relatively low intakes of iron, thiamin and calories have also been found by other researchers (Crumrine & Fryer, 1970; Metheny, et al., 1962) for this age group. Crumrine & Fryer (1970) found that 38 less than half the 40 preschool children studied met the Recom- mended Dietary Allowances for thiamin, calcium, calories and iron while all intakes for protein were above the allowance. Metheny, et al., (1962) found calcium, calories, thiamin and iron were low in the diets of 104 preschool children while riboflavin and protein were high. In her study on Denver preschool children, Beal (1953, 1954, 1955, 1956) found that mean daily intakes of all nutrients except iron and niacin met the Recommended Dietary Allowances. Studies conducted since that time such as the ones listed above have confirmed the low iron intakes but, in general, low niacin intakes have not been as frequent. This may be due to the recent recognition of niacin equiva- lents from tryptophan (Food & Nutr. Bd., 1968) which are now calculated in addition to the regular niacin intake. Suggested Explanations for Intake Variations The relatively low intakes by Center D for most nutrients in relation to other centers could be attributed to the fact that many of the children attended on a part- time basis, were from higher socio-economic level families and may, therefore, have had more food at home and smaller 1 appetites at the center. The high intakes of calcium (Figure 3) and riboflavin (Figure 7) by Center I reflected 1As a specific example, one boy commented one morning that he did not want any snack because he had had four pan- cakes for breakfast. 39 their milk consumption three times daily and their very low ascorbic acid (Figure 9) levels reflected the fact that no juice or fruit was served during the two—day period of study. Spaghetti with meat and iron-fortified dry cereal contributed to the relatively high iron intake by Center F. The very low intakes of vitamin A (Figure 5) for Centers G and H occurred because no good vitamin A source was served either day at either center whereas the extremely high intake for Center E reflected the use of carrots, a good source of vitamin A, in some form both days. The extremely high intake of ascorbic acid (Figure 9) by Center C reflected the large consumption of orange juice by the children. Contribution byAMeals and.Snacks Table 7 shows the per cent contribution meals and snacks made toward the daily caloric, protein and total nutrient intake. In general, snacks contributed a greater percentage of calories than of protein. In the centers serving two meals plus snacks a much greater percentage of calories, protein, and overall nutrient intake was contributed by the meals as was eXpected. In centers serving only lunch plus snacks, the snacks came close to providing almost 50 per cent of the daily caloric and overall nutrient intakes. 40 Menu Modification and Typical Representation Modifications ' Of the seventeen menus which were obtained ahead of time, two were received verbally, i.e. the cooks had not made out the menus but specified what they would serve that next day of observation. In both of these cases the cook did follow what she said. Of the remaining fifteen menus, six, which were from three centers only, were followed with no modifica- tions. In the other nine, the modifications which occurred were slight with the exception of one where the cook had forgotten which menu she had sent and began following a different one. She switched, howeVer, to the original menu and followed it as soon as she became aware of the mistake. Some examples and reasons for the slight modifica- tions were: substituted birthday cake for regular planned snack or dessert (child's birthday); changed salmon loaf to salmon patties (easier for children to handle); omitted cheese sauce (children didn't care for it); added whipped cream topping to gelatin (children liked it); added sausage to a breakfast menu (to give children more protein since they were just having salmon patties at noon); sub- stituted apple crisp for cherry cobbler (children didn't like thick dough and wouldn't eat cherry crisp); added 41 relishes such as green pepper, lettuce and tomato (left- overs to be used up); substituted milk for cider or apple juice (didn't have any cider or apple juice); substituted bread for bran muffins (children wouldn't eat bran muffins). Generally speaking, the modifications which o¢curred were slight enough to have little effect on the nutrient intake of the children. Many of the reasons the cooks gave for the modifications concerned the likes and dislikes of the children which brings to question why certain foods as these were even planned on the menu. There were a considerable number of small modifications at one center in which a retired dietitian planned the menus but there were no modifications at another center where menus were planned by a retired dietitian. Also, some of the modi- fications which occurred were made by cooks who either planned the menu or were consulted in the planning. Therefore, no conclusions can be drawn as to the effects of menu planner on the extent of menu modifica- tion, but from this study at least it can be concluded that menu modification did occur to some extent but the types of modifications made were minor for the most part and many of the reasons for which they occurred, at least according to the cooks, were for the benefit of the children's likes and dislikes. 42 Typical Representation of Menus Table 8 indicates a breakdown of five-day lunch menus into food groups for the two days of study at each day care center (days 1 and 2) plus three different days either from the same week or a different week. One center did not provide an extra set of menus so no comparison could be made and it was, therefore, eliminated. All menus from days 1 and 2 appeared to be quite typical as compared to those from days 3, 4, and 5 for all centers with the exception of Center H which served no fruits or juices for lunch during the days of study but these were listed for the other three days of com- parison. Ascorbic acid intake for this center was still above average, however, since fruits and juices were served at times other than lunch time throughout the day. Height and Weight Increment Height increment averages (Table 9, Figure 10a) for girls and boys at six centers for three spring months were 0.72 and 0.64, respectively. These were in good agreement with standard increments of 0.74 and 0.66, respectively, obtained by averaging four suggested increments for a 4-4 1/2 year old obtained from Simmons (1944), Simmons & Todd (1938), Watson & Lowrey (1967—- modified Stuart Meredith tables) and Jackson & Kelly 43 (1945). This age range was selected since the average age of all girls and boys at the time of the first measure- ments ranged from 3.8 to 4.2 years with the exception of one group of six boys from Center E who averaged 4.9 years of age. With these boys a slightly lower increment in height and weight would be eXpected. Actual results showed that these boys were, in fact, the closest group to the standards in both height and weight. Weight increment averages (Table 9, Figure 10b) for the girls and boys were 2.03 and 1.29, respectively as compared to the respective standards of 1.28 and 1.13. In general, the girls grew in height and gained in weight slightly more than the boys as was expected from the standard increments given. One finding contrary to expectations was the greater growth found in weight rather than height which should have been the reverse for the period during the spring months. Possibly part of the difference could be attributed to types of shoes which were worn at both times. In February boots may have been worn in some cases which would have increased the height slightly for the February data thereby making the increment smaller. However, in the two centers where measurements were taken without shoes (C and F) increments were still below the standard for height in both cases and above the standard in weight for both. In reference to weight, winter clothing may have had a 43 (1945). This age range was selected since the average age of all girls and boys at the time of the first measure- ments ranged from 3.8 to 4.2 years with the exception of one group of six boys from Center E who averaged 4.9 years of age. With these boys a slightly lower increment in height and weight would be eXpected. Actual results showed that these boys were, in fact, the closest group to the standards in both height and weight. Weight increment averages (Table 9, Figure 10b) for the girls and boys were 2.03 and 1.29, respectively as compared to the respective standards of 1.28 and 1.13. In general, the girls grew in height and gained in weight slightly more than the boys as was eXpected from the standard increments given. One finding contrary to expectations was the greater growth found in weight rather than height which should have been the reverse for the period during the spring months. Possibly part of the difference could be attributed to types of shoes which were worn at both times. In February boots may have been worn in some cases which would have increased the height slightly for the February data thereby making the increment smaller. However, in the two centers where measurements were taken without shoes (C and F) increments were still below the standard for height in both cases and above the standard in weight for both. In reference to weight, winter clothing may have had a 45 for Center C boys and girls. Children from Center D had below average nutrient intakes but height increments were average for both boys and girls while weight incre- ments were above standard for girls and below standard for boys. Hemoglobin Calculation of the average hemoglobin values for the children from each of the two day care centers from which data were available resulted in an average of 11.3 gm. for the 12 children at Center C and 11.8 gm. for the 62 children at Center A. Both of these values fell in the "acceptable" range as set by the Interdepartmental Committee on Nutrition for National Defense (ICCND, 1963). For individual values at Center C, 17 per cent fell in the "low" range (lo-10.9 gm.) and 83 per cent in the "acceptable" range (ll-12.4 gm.). At Center A 2 per cent (1 child) were "deficient" (<10.0 gm.), 19 per cent were "low" (lo-10.9 gm.), 48 per cent were "acceptable" (ll-12.4 gm.), and 31 per cent were "high" (>12.5 gm.). The children from Center A had a higher hemoglobin level than those from Center C but the reverse was true for the iron intake for the children of these two centers. 446 .HOOOHO gouacu O cousnON .HmmOHV HHOHsz a upmz H OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH ucwsmoymc O O O.H OH. OH. HOO O.H Om O.OH O.O 0.0 OOH O O O.H OH. OH. OOO O.H Om 0.0H 0.0 0.0 OOH H yam: OOH: Huumnmmmm OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH ungmmumO O O O. OO. OO. OO O.O OO OO O. 0.0 OOH O O O. OO. OO. OO O.H OO OO O. 0.0 OOH H mcmwm Omxmm .. OO OO OO :1 OO OO OOH OO OO OOH ocmgmmuOm O Ho 0.0 OH. OO. up O.O OO OO O.O O.O OOO O up O.O OH. OO. up O.H OO OO O.O 0.0 OOO H Cdm mehflflEmm Om .. u- .. OO OO I- OO OOH OO OO usmEmmuOO O OH - I- n- .. OOH O. u- 0.00 H. O. OO O O O. HO. OO. OOH O. O O.OH H. O. OO H H ..anOxOOU UOHHuh OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH acmemman O O O. OO. OO. OOO O.H OO 0.0 O. O.H OO O O O. OO. OO. OOO O.H OO 0.0 O. O.H ON H mcmwm cmwuo OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH . OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH acmemmuma O O O. OO. .OO. OO0.0H O. OO 0.0 O. O. OO O O O. OO. OO. OOO.OH O. OO O.O O. O. OO H muouumu H.OEO H.OEO H.OEO H.OEO HOHO 1.OEO H.OEO H.8OO H.8OO H.8OO OHoO.omm :HomHz cH>mHHonHm OHEche « .uH> couH asHono mumucxzonumo Ham :Hmuoum mmHuono. N.H.moHnmu coHuHmomfioo ©00u 03p cmo3uwb uswEoonm ucoo Hod :HHB mHmmn Edum OOH o co m000u oouomHom mo ucoacoo ucmHHu5211.v mHm mEmuuxm umOE 0:» can wdHowu 02H MOM 03Hm> mcu cmm3umn UmcHEHmump mm3 ucwEmmHmm .OHm>HuomOm6u .AOOH .O .OOOHO .m .OOOHV HwEHmzmHoumm Eouw cmxmu wuw3 meHowm H -- OO OOH OO NO OO OO OO OO HO NO “swammuOO O up O. N. OH. HOO O. HOH H.ON H.HH O.O ONN O up O. N. OH. OOO O. HOH H.ON H.HH O.O OHN N O. O. N. OO. OOO O. OHN H.O O.O N.O OOH mOHomm wmmmcu w Ocoumomz 1. OO OO OO nu NO HO OO OO OO OO acmsmmnmm O -- O.N NN. OH. .. O.H O O.O N.OH O.OH OON N O.O O.N OH. OO. OOO N.N ON O.O O.O O.OH OOH mmHomm wmoq pom: -- OOH OO OO OO .. OO OO OO OO OO Hamemman O O H. OH. OO. OOH OO. OHH O.OH O.O O.O NNH O H H. OH. OO. OOH HH OHH O.OH O.O O.O HHH N H H. OH. NO. OOH NO. NO O.ON O.O O.N OOH omHomO WCHCUSQ mHHHcm> H.OEO H.OEO H.OEO H.OEO HOHO H.OEO H.OEO H.6OO H.EOO H.EOO ©O0<.0m< COUMHZ cO>mHmonHm CHEMOLB m .uO> COHH ESHUHMU wumupmnonumu umm :Hmuoum mmHHOHmu m.m.m0HQmu coHuHmOQEOU p00w 03» com HmmmHowu p0u6H50Hm0 cmw3uwn ucmfiwmumm ucoo Mom LuO3 mHmwQ Emum OOH m :0 mmLme poxHE pmuomem m0 ucmucoo HC0OHHSZII.m mHmMHwonHm GHEMHSB GHEmuH> COHH EdHonU aflmuoum mmOHonu mama mumu Ono .mumucoo ouwo >60 cmchon cumum03 0CH: CH Onmm momm,coupHHLo H0050mmum mo 0xmucH ucmHHudc cam 0HH0Hmo OHHmp ommnw>H0m HmmE cho mm3 QUGSH .cocsH paw ummmxmoun cuon medHUQH mHmozN .c0>0H0 an mGHpH>H© paw ACHououm paw mmHHOHmo OQHUSHUQHO mucoHuusc cm>wHw onu m0 zoom HOH QOHHSQHHHGOU ucwo me may OCHQHQEOU >3 O0HMHonmo mm3 momum>m wxmucH HGOHHHSG HHMH0>O 49 H mm HO Om mm 0.0m O.NO mxomcm O gonna wmm me mom OOH ONO OOH mxomcm O mHmme 039 mHmmz mxomcm mHmmz mxomcm mHmmz mxomcm "mcH>Hmm meuch mm OH NO OH . mm mH Om OH NO OH mm OH NH Om MO mO ON mm OO MO ON mm OH NO ON m mm OO Om HO OO Nm mO mm on ON mm Hm 0 mm NO NO ON OO om mm NO OO Om NO mm m NO - mm OO mm NO Om NO mm mm Om . mO mm m mm NO mm OO mm OO MO . Om OO Om HO mm O OO OH Om . mH Om ON Om N OO O mm O NO mm mH mm mH Om mH NO O .NO O mm mH Nm OOO wNN OOO mHN OOO wom OOO OHN OOO me OOO wON N¢ mHmwz mxomcm .mHmmz mxowsm mHmwz mxomcm mHmoz mxomam mHmwz mxomcm mHmwz mxomcm kucou mmmuw>¢ chuonm mmHHOHmu wmmuo>¢ chuonm moHnono mum ucmHHusz HHMH0>O ucwHHusz HHmHm>O 0 mac N ONO H Odo . .mao msH>Hom omonu paw mHmofi 03p mcH>Hom mumucmo amm3u0o mHnu m0 GOmHHmmfioo m30£m puma couuom .mHchoo oumo amp smmHonz snoummz mch um mxomcm cam mHmme >n pwustnucoo cmanHco Hoonommum mo Hmmmuw>m mxmucH uquHHs: HHmH0>0 paw chuoum .moHHOHmo Homo Hom||.O MHmme 51 H H H H MHHZ HHommoa OHQEHm OCHHOOHOE H0 Hmwwsm mHoDOOHm OHOHO Ho OmmHm pocoHHcm mmoHDO Ho mpHSHm mmHQmpomm> mmEsmmH .mmmm .OHHHsom .anm .pooz m Hmpcou MHHZ uHommoo OHQEHm ocHHmmHmz Ho Howpsm mHUSOOHm QHOHD Ho OOOHm OOQOHHcm mOOHSO Ho mHHSHm mmHQMHm®0> moEDOOH .mmmm .OHHHDOQ .amHm .Hmmz m Hmwcmm HHH: HHmmmOQ OHQEHm mcHHomHmz Ho Hmpusm mHoDOOHm CHOHO H0 OOOHm O0£0HHcm mOOHOO Ho OHHSHM mmHmeomm> moEDOOH .mmmm .OHHHsom .QmHm .pmoz ma r—iI—l l—lr—iI—lv—I I—it-It—lI—i mwmwmmm Ln Lan') l—lt—lr-i r—l t—IMFN r—iI—I t—lNr—ll—iI—l Ln I—IN Ln N r-i r-I L0 U) H Ln H H r-ir-ir—II-it—l t-i r—lNr-lI—lt—l r-l ONCDOWr—i Ln LOLO O O Q‘QVLOLO H H H H H Ln 0 r—ir-Ir-ir-it—I r-ir—ir-lI—lI—il—l t—il\ LOU) L0 .0 O LDGDLOLOLOI—im r-iNr-lr-lI—l I—lNr—II—ir—l Nl—Ir—ir—iI—l r—iNr—iI—ir—l LDLD .0>¢ HONOR m O m N . H msouo poom Hmhma .COSGHHCOUII.m mHmdB 52 .mmsoum UOOM Momma N mcflnHMpcoo Emgfl ween coaumcflnaoo m :a gammmgm pqsoam mymaflxoummm mpmoawcfi m.c0Hpommm .scmE ma“ :0 mmsoum GOOH mo wocmskum map 0p uwmmn mHQMp :H mumnfisz .xmmz pawummmwc m Eouw mscma on no xmms mEMm man How mszmfi gonna mqflcflmfimn may 0p Hmmmn m mam .v .m mmmw umcsum :fl Umwsaonw mmmc 0p Hmmwu m cam H mama H LDNQ‘ m HI—i r-i Ln r—ir-l Ln thr-IFLDQ'LD oxxoxooxoov I 0 Ln Q'MMV'Q‘NLD 0 Ln r-ir-ir-i H H r-‘Ir-iI-iI—i r-i I-iN r-‘lI-it-lr-il-l r-l I—IN Hr-lr-Ir-l r-lr-II-I r-l Ln I-lI-l r-lt-lr-lr-l Ln I-lt-i r-lr-lv-‘lr-l MAME pummmma mamfiwm mcflnmmumz Ho umppsm mposwonm Qflwuw Ho wmmum meUHH:m mmUHSb Ho muflsnm m®HQMpmmm> mmEsmmq .mmmm .mu#asom .Lmam .pmmz m umpcmu MHflz puwmmwo mamfiflm mcwnmmumz no Hmupsm mposwoum :Hmuw Ho wmmum wmnoflucm mmuasb Ho mpfisum mmanmymmm> mmEsmmA .mmmm .muwasom .nmam .gmmz U Hmyzmu .m>< ngoe m Hmhma msouw woom .Cmscwgcooll.m mqm¢ uQmEmuocH mm.a mo.~ mm.H vo. N». we. mmmnm>¢ mamamm Hmpoe ov.m mv.m ov.m mw. mw. ow. m.m N.v o.w ma om mm m mm.a oo.m an.a mm. HH.H Hm. m.w m.m m.w o m wH m no. mv.m wm.a mu. an. mm. N.v m.m o.w o m NH o mm.a mm.a om.a mm. mv. mv. o.v o.v o.v OH w ma U mm. mm.m mm.a mm. oo.H mm. m.m m.m m.m Ha m 5H m on. wH.H mm. mm. mm. mm. N.v m.m H.v mm mm vv 4 mmom mauflw ‘msouo whom mauww QSOHU whom manflw msouo whom manflw QDOHO Amnav Aaflv pcmfiwuocH uzmflmz meEmHocH unmflmm mmfl mmmgm>¢ HmQEDZ .mnmacmo mumo mam :mmflzoflz cumummz xwm mqflcsmu#m when 6cm mauflm Hoogomwum mo musmEmHocH psmflms spcofilm mam ~mqufimmocfl pnmflms nucofilm ~mmm mmmum>m .Hmafisc Hmyosln.m mqmfla 57 .mocmccvuuw zfiwwv a“: mo :uwcofi «nu co wcwvcwmow u mo comauwaeoo .v mmonu wmmfizwo mmo mmmm panEmuom LHHB Hupwnmmmm N .02 ago: xHHZ mg ”a Law: xfiflz mcflmmoe commflrz xaflz xflflz p_w mchcsm mumHooono pumpmsu oon moHuuwQBMHum cmuoum OHHwo “Houm mchosm mHchm> m2 xHHz xHHz xHHz xHHx mmHde mexOOU xHHz mCHmHmm nuHB #Hsum cmwum uwuusm a pmwum Hmuuom a pmwum mmmcmuo mchpom pmmum prwsm a woman M monum wouumu monuw wanwO Hmausm a pmonm monum pmHmm pwmmoa u HHooooum pmumuuom mwoumfioe pmSwum mammumdmfi xHonU a pouumv mooumvom pwnmmz MW mooumuom Conmmz omwwcu a Hcoumomz pmHmm camped LUHBCQmm poo: mmmm a :UMCHQm monum :mHh wcoHco a H0>Hq cwquLU poHHm cm>o doom oHnmuomo> mMOH Em: xi: xi: w. .v. xHHz xHHz oumHooocu xHHz Hoxomuu 50H3pcmm e W - meHuwmcmB pmmum pmuoupom mpwxomuo memuo mmmpmz demm Howuzm a woman m2 xHHz xHHz xHHz xflflz xaflz m ummoe .um ummos ammos .nm ammoe .um uwuusm a msnmm m mmqm kuusm uocmmm mmmm pwHQEmuom mchHmm mwxmocmm H meuumm xuom mwmem cuou coomm :uHB Hmeumo wmmmsmm e onon omcmuo HHouxoou uHsum monomwm pooHHm mxcscu demmwch mummm w xmpmusze xmpmmccmz mmpmwse hmpcoz H .02 9:02 sqsflum Illnllllulltliinlnullii. . - 34‘. .-. . on .mscmE meEom Houcmo mumo >MQII.OH mamas xHHz wHQmmmCHm waHum aouumu mmflno cumuom owHo a cam nuHS meuonsmm xHHz ocfloosm mumfloooso mammm mzHHum >>mu0 w mooumuom cosmouu cmeHco xafiz mumwm mmmm omHo w mcsm nufls moon no: xHHE oHHmn mmwcu Cumuom owHO w mcsm :uH3 won xmmon xHHz woswmmHmm< ommum cuou mxoflum uouumo ummm guaz Huumcmmmm qounq v .02 5:02 90 wowsb oumEOB find monoou mnmxomuo onxoou :HmHm oOHow uHoumemuo xHHz mmw a mmHHHwQBmuum mmmm pmHH>mo EHHS oHHwh mEHH wauwu hum mmHCBOHm x. xHHz xHHz xHaz - xHHz monOOU LDHB pmHmm Eoouu pwmdacz. xHH: oxmouuocm monommm pooHHm :HDMHmu xunmncmuu LuHB momma hwumzu 1 mvooHudm pmHHHco ommunnmmcHo Hmmm Hmuusm a HHom mouusm a woman . com mom #0: m uwuusm w pmmum kuuom w pmoum mcmwm cwwuo mchmwno oume :mHHmm m pmHmm commoa mmch Hommmm comma uoxomn CH mooumuom HHooooum moaum somoum wmwmzu a Hcoumomz Lowzpcmm >waoB wosmm mmmmzu x>muo a mwoumuom . mmoo uom moon poo: doom mHnmymmm> :uHS wmoq GOEHmm xwxuse pooHHm 8 1 mamHooonO Dom xHHz a ummoe xHHx unmoe W ammoa mmmm mouxm nuH3 mumHooonu pom mmmm J xHHz cuH3 HmmEumo coomm ammoe nocmum muocoo Eumz ommmomm w mcoHuomm uHsuwmmmuw umuomz HooHnmd moHsn mmcmuo mwOHHm mmcmuo monHm wmcmuo 3 mopHum mmpmnoce xmomocpmz xmowosa ampcoz m .oz and: .CODCHUCOUII.OH mdmdfi 9O smofium xHHz xHHz xHHz mammmmcflm maacoga mumflouono xflflz xHHz mosmmmflama 1 monum uouumu mcwmm ocHHum mumwm oHHwn pmmum cuou m mmHnU Cumuom >>muw a moon mQHnu oumuom monum uouumu W omHo a com wmoumuom memmHU omHO a mcsm ooHo w mcom wwwm nuflz ammusnsmm :mxoflzo cuflz moon no: Hafiz won samofim Baa: Huumcmmmm v .02 ocmZ ooHsh oumEOB find mmeooo mnwxomuo monooo CHmHm oost HHsuwwmmHo xHHz wmw a meHHmQSMHum mmmm pwHH>mo nuHB oHHmn mEHH Hmmnwu who meCBOHm x. xHHz xHHz HHH: - HHH: monOOO cuH3 pmHmm Emmuu pwmman xHHz wxmouuonm monommm ponHm GHumHow xunmncmuu H3 muuma ammo u 1 muooHumd owHHHnU pmmhnummcww Hmwm Hmvusm a HHom Hmuusm a pmmum Lu. :5 mom um m kuuom a pmmum Hmuusm w pmmum mcmwm :mwuw mcmemHo m mm we on o pmHmm pounce mmCHm Hmmmmm cwmuw uoxomw CH mmoumuom HHooooum mwawm nomwnm q wmmmco a Hcoumomz 50Hzpcmm Amxuoe 005mm mmwwnu >>mu0 a mmOpmuom . mmma uom mmoq pom: doom mHnwummo> naH3 wmoq COEHmm mwxnse pooHHm : 8 mumHooozu pom xHHz a ammoe xHaz ammoa e . . X ammos mmmm Donaw cuH3 mumHooozu pom mmmm 3 xHHz nuH3 Hmmfiumo coomm ammoe nocmum muscoa Euwz wmmmsmm fl mcoHuomm uHoummmmuo Hmuooz HOUHHQm monn mmcmuo monHm mmcmuo wmoHHm mmcmuo 3 mmpmusne >m©mwcpm3 mmpmmoe ampcoz m .02 5cm: .pwocHucooln.0H mqmdfi 9O xHHz xHHE xHHz mHQmmmch mchpom muMHooonu xHHE xHHz mosmmemd< T wxowum uouumu mammm mcfluum mumwm oHHwn Umwum cuoo m mmwco Cumuom m>muw a moon mmHnU oumpom monum uonhmo W OmHO w com mmoumuom memmHU omHO a mcsm omHO w mcsm . wwmm Baas ummnsnEmm cmxofino cnflz moon uom Hafiz won samofim snag Huumnmmmm v .02 5cm: ooHSH oumfioe find monoou muwxomuo onxoou :HmHm mOHoh uHonwQOuw xHHz wmw a mmHHHwQ3muum mmmm pmHH>mQ cwHS oHHwh mEHH wanwu who meconm x. xHHz xHHz xHaz - xHHZ monooo LuH3 pmHmm Emmuu commanz. xHHz mxmouuonm monomom ponHm :HumHmw xhumncmuu a. 1 muooHHm< UwHHH£U pmmunummcHw Hmmm Hmpusm a HHom Houusm a pmmum squ muumam “H050 n uwuuom a pmmum Hmuusm a ommum mammm cmouw mchmwua com on non w pmHmm owmmOB mmch Hommmm cmmuu uoxomh :H mmoumuom HHooooum oumHm zmHHmm u. mmomcu w Hcoumomz £0H3pcmm xoxuoe woomm mmomno >>muo a wmoumuom mmHHmmmocmum mmoq pom: doom anmummo> cuH3 wmoq GOEHmm xwxnse pooHHm m 9 yo: 8 mumaooogo pom xHHz m umMOB xHHE umwoe W umMOB mmmm mouhw :uH3 mDMHooocu pom mmmm J xHHz :uH3 Hmwfiumo coomm ammoe cocmum muscoo Eumz wmmmsmm fl mcoHuomm pHoummmon umuomz voowumm moHsn mmcmmo mooHHm wmcmuo woOHHm omcmuo 3 wprHm xmpmuszfi xmpmmcpmz wmpmmse ampcoz m .02 Sam: .UODCHuCOUII.OH mqméh 91. xHH: oOHoo mHmmmmch :H mcmcmm owOHHm mchmmua a wosupoq EOHBUcmm OMHmm 8:99 doom coxOHnu mo Emouu xHHz. umpusm a ommum mumwm ponQ owccmo mxoflum sumeo mammm cwwuu cmmm cpmnom a wmmm pcsouw .r «U M... a...” xHHz Hkuxoou uHoum LuHB oHwa monum pounmo :0H3pcmm GMHmm Em: doom mumeU mo Emmuo xHHz mosmmemmm Hogusm w pmwum mxoflum sumfiwo mmmm .um mwoumuom Umnmmz cwonco pmfimmuo .mcfloosm mumaoooro xHHZ meHum uouumu ,noflzocmm mafimn w Hmuusm uscmmm msom mHnmuomm> qounq m .02 5cm: moasn q.d . U . xHHz mHmQ< no HmpHU euw mnmxomuo magma xaflz xHHz mumaoooco Ammfiom passages m. a kuusm uscmwm mmeOOO muoxomuu w mmwwzo mnmxomuo Emcmuu HOV mucccmsoa xHHE xHHz cumumsu omxmm moo HHH: xHHz xHHE pmwum UHHHmU mcmcmmuwHQmmwch Emmuo 00H Emmnu pwmmsz umwm a nommm mCmeoHQ mcHuusz comm 1 mQHnu cumuom oHHmh uHsum mocoz\#HoomHm UMHmm commoe mumHmU\mmeon m mmeon mHHom chcHQ Hop3om mcmem meHum mmom a muouumu o monum Homamm monon\>HwHwU omownu\ww3onHHsmu uouumo a xumHoo kuasm q cmwuu w pounmu pmHmm powwoe ammowm mcwwm comuo cumuom poxmm Bon oHou wwoamfioe poSmum >>muu Acoonnu novmmmm monumu -s: - com co wavmnumm mmoonu w Hcoumoo: HHom xwxusa £HH3 OUHm ancmmm mmOH wow: ,1 xHHX m xHHS ammoe scamccHo xHHz a xHHma coomm >HHwn mmOHHm wmmmno ummoe m ummOB Umwmuusm QSHMm ummOH pmumuusm moflm mo Emwuu monsu owomcu W mom pmxoou whom umMOB nocmum mmom pwzomom no ummnz mo Emmuu mxcHA mmxoam s wUHDh uHsumwmmno moHSh mmcmuo mwmpmz mmcmno mmcmcmm pmoHHm moHsn wmcmuo 4 mprum mmpmuscfi mmvmocpmz hmpwmse mmpcoz m .02 scmz .CODCHUEOUII.OH mqmde ‘ A _ ... .... n.- xHHz xHHz xHHE xHHz cud mememm meoonu HmEHCC mumxomuu OOHCU mdmuo moxomuo HCEHCC w W a uouumu .xumeO mom poHHom m Cqu monsu mmwono mCoHuoom memHO CuH3 mCHmHmm m. xHHz xHHz xHHZ OOH mummm Hmuusm CuHS xHHz xHHz Couusm xHHz pwmum umwzz OHOCZ HHmuxOou uHsum mCoHuomm mmcmuo CHH3 Ummnm CHmHmm OODMmOHQQC mmCmemm vausm M meQwummm> pmtz mCHmmmHQ COCwuh Coupon CuHB mpHCOmHm a xuoHOO .muouumu CuH3 mCwasz u pmHmw oumuom Cqu UmHmm woouumq CHOU Umumuuom cmem uHCum COMCHmm W COH3pCmm mCmmm Umxmm CumuOm ummzm poxmm mmmm CuH3 ououom pmxmm mmmmno owHHHuo moon pox Cmoq Em: omxmm :mHo no: Comm :uoo Owed ummz XHME S V OOHCO mmCmuo OOHDO mHmmmmCHm OOHon wdmuo Houusm w W «A pmmum muwxumno mCoHuowm uscmmm cuHB OOHCO mmCmno 3. DJ CD mmumswm umwz CHHB monsu mmmeU mmcmuo w OHQQC mnwxomuu Emnmuo Eon CHHS mCHmmCz X m .02 5:0: HOHQQOO Cowom mxmu mosmwOHmm< xHHE owonm CHOU wxmo uuommma xHaz I . mCOaCo a xHHz n xHHz uwuuom a pmmum moo . . u umEOB OOOHHm Couuom w pmmum o mHnmuoow> on 3mHm 00am mHnmuomm> H Human uom xfiflz oHCCmmcflm a nounmo mmmm cmsm xomHm omfimm cumuom pom pmHmm Cmmuu COHzpCmm umoz CHOU Em: ommmsmm CmHHom mmmeO w HCoumomz msom Comm moHpooz a «mom . OOHCO uHsum OOHCO uHsum 8 OOHCO uHoum monomom OOHCh uHsum uHon OOHCO uwsum a ammoe CHmHmm COHzpCmm >HHOO dsnxm mCkuCz CHmem uHsHm pm3wum W mmmm pmHnEmuom a uwuusm uCmem a ummoe COCOCE mOOuMHOC proHHmom COH3©Cmm J COOmm Hmoumu pom wwmmzmm Em: Hmmumu OHOO w xHHz xHHZ xHHz xHHE xHHz 3 xmpHum hmpmusce ampmepmz xmpmmsh hmpCoz h .02 DCOZ .UODCHHCOUII.OH mqmdfi HICHIGRN STRTE UNIV. LIBRRRIES 31293102527854