AWg ABSTRACT A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SPORTS PREFERENCES IN SPECTATING AND PARTICIPATING IN THO GRAND RAPIDS AREA HIGH SCHOOLS by Joyce E. Buckley This study presents a comparative picture of personal sport preferences in spectating and participating patterns of two groups of high school girls: one group represents the population of an inner-city school; the other a sub- urban area. The author believes that this is an initial attempt to investigate the family and educational variables which may influence the respondents in respect to sport activities. A questionnaire was constructed to obtain information concerning the subjects' spectating and participating patterns in sports along with those of the parents. Infor- mation was also obtained on family background. The ques- tionnaire was administered November 18, 1966. The data was subjected to statistical analysis including frequency and percentage tables for selected variables. Certain variables were tested via Chi-Square: The level of significance obtained may be found at the bottom of selected tables. Joyce E. Buckley Chi-Square analysis revealed no significant relation- ships between participating and spectating variables. There are however. definite patterns in sport spectating and participating within these two groups of students. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SPORTS PREFERENCES IN SPECTATING AND PARTICIPATING IN TWO GRAND RAPIDS AREA HIGH SCHOOLS By Joyce E. Buckley A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Department of Health, Physical Education and Recreation 1967 AChNOWLEDGMENTS The author wishes to express her most sincere gratitude and appreciation to Dr. Harry Webb for his most valuable assistance throughout this study. Grateful acknowledgment is made to Mr. John Morris of the Computer Institute for his assistance in computer programming. The writer also wishes to express her thanks to the subjects for their time and cooperation. And lastly. to her friends for their encouragement during this study. 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter I. THE PROBLEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . Statement of the Problem Need for the Study . . . Procedures . . . . . . . Limitations of th Study II 0 biETHODS O O O O O O O I O O O O O O 0 Sample . . . . . . . . Administration . . . . Coding . . . . . . . . Statistical Techniques 0 O O C O O O O O O O C III. PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS OF DATA . . Background Information . . . . . Family . . . . . . . . . . . Sports . . . . . . . . . . . Required Physical Education . IV. ANALYSIS OF SELECTED VARIABLES . . . . Family Information . Spending Money . . . Club Membership . . . Future Occupations . V. SPORT PREFERENCE PATTERNS . . . . . . Spectating Preferences . . . . . . Participating Preferences . . . . . VI. ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION CLASS ACTIVITIES AND FUTURE SPORTS . . . Physical Education Class Activities Future Activity Plans . . . . . . . VII 0 S LIN-MARY O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O BIBLI OGMPHY O O O O O O O O O O C O O O O O O O O C O O O O O O O O O Page H #wmcn cm own£rc' £r \nxuhsw Wm M N (:0 \O (\3 mm: \003 .p H an: mid 48 #8 50 53 5Q Table H O O O \O CDV O\U\ Flu.) N F‘ 14 H1 k3 r» I4 H' h‘ r4 cow O\\J'l (run N H O 19. 20. 21. 22. LIST OF TABLES Age of Subjects . Number of Brothers . Number of Sisters . Total Number of Brothers Fathers' Education . Mothers' Education . Fathers' Occupation Spending Money . . . and Recreational Spending Money Spectator Sport Preferences Sport Participation New Sport Preference . Sports Learned from Family Sports Played with Family Fathers' Sport Preferences Mothers' Sport Preferences Sports Learned in Physical Sports Would Like to Have Learned Education Participation After Graduation . Membership in School Club Membership in Outside of School Clubs Future Occupations . iv Page 10 11 11 12 13 13 15 16 17 19 20 21 23 21L 25 26 27 Table 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 36. LIST OF TABLES - Cont ued Number of Brothers by Race Number of Sisters by Race . . . . . . . Fathers' Education by Race . . . . . . . Fathers' Occupation by Race . . . . . . Mothers' Education by Race . . . . . . . Mothers' Occupation by Race . . . . . . Spending Money by Race . . . . . . . . Recreational Spending by Race . . . . . School Clubs by Race . . . . . . . . . . Outside School Club Membership by Race . Future Occupations by Race . . . . . . . Spectating Sport Preferences by Race . . Participant Sport by Race . . . . . . . Comparison of Sports Learned in Physical Education Classes and Future Sports Part101pat10n o o o o o o o o o o o o Page 30 3o 31 31 33 33 35 36 36 37 39 #2 #4 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix page A. Questionnaire . . . B. Coding Forms . . C. Sports Recall List . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 vi CHAPTER I THE PROBLEM Statement of the Pgoblem. This study presents a comparative picture of the personal sports preferences in spectating and participating patterns of two groups of high school girls: one group represents the population of an inner-city school; the other, a suburban school. The author believes that this is an initial attempt to inves- tigate the family and educational variables which may influence the respondents in respect to sport activities. Head for thg Study. American life is marked with a high degree of competitiveness in everyday living. ‘Whether this competition lies in grades, occupation, or mate-seeking is of little consequence. since all of these situations are conducive to producing a varied amount of tension. Thus. leisure time provides essential "safety valve" releases for our society. The majority of our society welcome quitting time each day and the freedom of weekends to relax and release these resultant tensions. The methods employed to achieve the desired ends however. are frequently as elusive as the totally satisfying occupation. In one of his articles Tumin states the problem in these words: 2 In the interim. as a result of the impact of the average work situation. the worker tends to spend his most energetic hours at a Job which does not draw his talents out of him: does not exercise his creative potential; does not afford him a sense of power and domination over the product and the machine but rather makes him feel subordinate to both; and provides him with no sense of significant contribution to and membership in the society. To the extent that these conditions prevail. it is my hypothesis that the average worker comes to his home-life and community- life with a net deficit of psychic satisfactions. He therefore. brings to these extra occupational life spheres a high demand upon them by way of the kinds of gratifications he seeks and the degrees of intensity with which he seeks them. (7, 270) In a child centered society such as the United States, the home and school. namely parents and educators are responsible for presenting the basic foundation necessary to the student to enable her to live a satisfying and meaningful life. One essential aspect of this framework is the development of skills to be used in leisure time. It is the author's intention to examine these skills through a survey of sport preferences in spectating and participating, to determine the need for reorganization of physical education curricular content in each school. Through this investigation the author hopes to help prepare the student to use her leisure time in sport activities that would allow for personal satisfaction or gratificiation, maintain a standard of physical fitness advantageous to her particular position or occupation. provide a basic knowledge and skill in a variety of sport activities available in the respective communities, and to have fun in her leisure time. .47).; IE:— 3 Procedures. During the fall term, 1966. a questionnaire was constructed to investigate the sport preferences in spectating and participating patterns of high school girls in two Grand Rapids area schools. The questionnaire was administered by the author in the respective schools on November 18, 1966, using a stratified random sample. The population consisted of fifty sophomore and fifty senior girls from each of the two schools. Limitations of the Stydy. One-half of the respondents had not been involved in regular physical education classes for two years. therefore the respondents were dependent upon an accurate memory. To aid recall, an extensive list of sports1 was added to the questionnaire. The conclusions of the study will apply only to the two schools from which the samples were drawn. And lastly. the lack of similar studies will make it impossible to compare results and validate the interpretation of data. —____ ISee Appendix C. CHAPTER II METHODS After receiving permission from the principals of the schools involved. the author sent ten copies of the questionnaire to one of the schools as a trial test for clarity of the questions. After minor revisions, the questionnaire1 was mimeographed and each copy prenumbered. The schedule consisted of four pages with forty questions and an extensive sports recall listZ. It was distributed in the respective schools on November 18, 1966 by the author. The sample size consisted of two hundred subjects. fifty sophomores and fifty seniors from each school. The subjects were chosen at random from the female tenth and twelfth grade population having a study hall in the morning at one school and in the afternoon at the other. The students met in an empty room and were seated on only one side of the tables in the room to avoid unnecessary conversation and comparison of answers. The questionnaires were then distributed along with verbal instructions for responding. lsee Appendix A for entire questionnaire. 2See Appendix C for sports recall list. a 5 The students were directed to sign their names on a prenumbered sheet of paper beside the number of their questionnaire. The author accompanied this sheet around the room. It was possible to obtain the Differential Apptitude Test Batteryl scores and the race of each student from the cumulative records in this manner. The above method of obtaining the information was used to free the student to answer the questions with complete anonymity. A coding sheet2 was constructed recording by hand all responses directly from the observations. While authorities on questionnaire construction state it is best to construct the code sheet before the questionnaire is given it was impossible to do this because of the varied response received on most questions. After construction of the coding sheet the data was transferred to coding forms using numerical characters to represent responses. The data was then key punched onto IBM cards with each observation requiring two cards. The processes described above are very time consuming unless the individual has previous knowledge and skills in key punching. For a moderate fee the Computer Institute will key punch and verify cards. If pressed for time it is a very wise idea to hire this job out to professionals saving the individual a week or two or work at odd moments. 1This information was not used due to lack of uniformity. ZSee Appendix B for coding sheets. 6 The card sort was used to obtain percentages on questions without rankings. The computer was employed to obtain percentage tables for sixty-three selected variables, to subject certain of the variables to the Kolmogorov- Smirnov Two sample test of difference between means, and the Chi—Square Two sample Test of Independence. Garrett describes this test as useful when we wish to investigate the relationship between traits or attributes which can be classified into two or more categories. (3,262) Tabulations are made in a contingency table, that is a double entry or two-way table in which the possession by a group of varying degrees of two characteristics is represented. (3, 263) Garrett explains further that when the expected or independence values have been computed. the difference between the observed and expected values for each cell is found. This difference is then squared and divided in each instance by the independence value. The sum of the quotients by a certain formula gives Chi-Square (3, 264). Chi-Square and Kolmogorov-Smirnov may be found in CISSR Technical Report no. h1.01 (8). This prOgram is functional at this time for the majority of the tests described in Siegel (6) and thus is designed for non- parametric analysis of primarily nominally or ordinally measured data. Any person planning on using the computer for problems of this type should allow approximately three 7 weeks to get the prOgram set up correctly and in getting the printed output. Several other technical bulletins give the basic information necessary to set up a program and are available in the Computer Library or in room 506 Computer Center. The following references were consulted during construction of the questionnaire: Deming (2, 1-23) Jahoda, Duetsch and Cook (a, 32h-Q62) and Lazarsfeld and Rosenberg (5. 83-93). PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS OF DATA This study constituted an investigation of the family background. sport preferences in spectating and participating and expressed plans for future participation in leisure time sport activities. The data was obtained through a questionnaire administered to one hundred ninety-seven tenth and twelfth grade girls in two Grand Rapids area high schools on November 18, 1966. This chapter will include a breakdown by percentage and frequency tables of data obtained from selected questions in the survey. Background Information Family. The ages of the subjects as of November 18, 1966 are indicated in Table 1 on page 9. A large number, one hundred fifty-eight, (81%) of the total were either fifteen or seventeen years old. One-half of the subjects were in grade ten and ninety-nine (50%) were in grade twelve. Tables 2 and 3 on page 9 indicate the number of brothers and sisters within each family respectively while Table 4 on page 10 gives the total number of children. 8 0 / TABLE 1 AGE OF SUBJECTS W Age in Years Number Percentage 11+ 3 1.5 15 76 38.5 16 19 9.5 17 81 U1.5 18 15 7.5 19 3 1 5. TABLE 2 NUFEER OF BROTHERS Number of Brothers Number Percentage 0 55 28.0 1 57 29.0 2 51 25.5 3 16 8.0 u 9 “-5 5 5 2.5 6 2 1.0 7 2 1.0 TABLE 3 NUMBER OF SISTERS Number of Sisters Number Percentage 0 63 32.0 1 71 35.5 2 24 12.0 3 21 10.5 L; 6 3.0 5 6 3.0 6 5 2.5 7 1 ,5 10 TABLE 4 TOTAL NUMBER OF BROTEERS AND SISTERS Number Frequency Percentage 0 20 10.2 1 45 22.5 2 40 20.0 3 31 15-5 a 22 11.0 5 12 6.0 6 12 6.0 7 7 3.5 8 3 1.5 9 1 .5 10 1 .5 11 1 .5 12 2 1.0 One hundred sixty-three (82.5%) of the respondents have two brothers or less and one hundred fifty-eight (80%) have two or less sisters. Less than (20%) thirty-nine respondents reported over four children in the family while twenty (10%) were only children. Thirty-four (17.3%) reported their father did not live at home, while only nine (u.6%) reported their mother not present in the home. A higher number, one hundred thirteen (57.5%) reported their mother had a high school education or more than the father with eighty-nine. (45.2%). Tables 5 and 6 on page 11 gives the entire breakdown. TABLE 5 FATHERS‘ EDUCATION 11 Grades Completed Number Percentage ist - 6th 3 1.5 7th - 9th 31 15.8 10th 24 12.2 11th 17 8.6 12th 56 28.5 Some College 17 8.6 College Graduate 14 7.0 Business School 2 1.0 TABLE 6 NOTRERS' EDUCATION Grades Completed Number Percentage 1st - 6th 1 .5 7th - 9th 29 14.8 10th 21 10.5 11th 25 12.7 12th 86 43.5 Some College 20 10.5 College Graduate 5 2.5 Business School 2 1.0 The occupational information is divided into groups derived from the United States Census Report. The majority of fathers. one hundred twenty-four (64%) are blue collar workers while forty—seven, (23.8%) are white collar. Twenty-four. (12.2%) did not report their fathers' occupation. Table 7 on page 12 depicts this information. 12 TABLE 7 FATHERS' OCCUPATION J _ Occupation Number Percentage 1 13 6.6 2 13 6.6 3 15 7.6 4 6 3.0 5 42 21.5 6 76 38.5 7 .. .. 8 8 4.0 9 .. .. 0 24 12.0 {ey: Level 1 = Professional, Technical and Kindred Workers Level 2 = Managerial Offices and Proprietors Level 3 = Clerical and Kindred Workers Level 4 = Sales workers Level 5 = Craftsmen. Foremen and Kindred Workers Level 6 = Operatives and Kindred Workers Level 7 = Private and Household Workers Level 8 = Service Workers (excluding private household) Level 9 = Laborers, except miners Level 0 = Occupation not reported The spending money of the respondents is illustrated in Table 8 on page 13. One hundred six (51.5%) had between $2.00 - 5.00 to spend each week; 11% had less than 32.00 and 17% had $10.00 or more. One hundred nine (55%) obtained their spending money by earning it. fifty-five (28%) acquired it through allowances, and twenty-four (12.2%) received their money partially through an allowance and earning it. Only ten (5%) were simply given the money. 13 TABLE 8 S PEI‘TDING MON '5. Y Amount Frequency Percentage 3 1.99 and less 22 11.0 2.00 - 2.99 32 16.0 3.00 - 3.99 23 11.5 4.00 - 4.99 11 5.5 5.00 - 5.99 40 20.0 6.00 - 9099 9 “'05 10.00 -14.99 18 9.0 15.00 -19.99 4 2.0 20.00 -24.99 4 2.0 25.99 -29.99 6 3.0 30.00 -39.99 3 1.5 40.00 -49.99 2 1.0 50.00 and above 1 .5 TABLE 9 RECREATIONAL SPENDING ============================================================ Amount Frequency Percentage A 1.99 and less 75 38.0 2.00 - 2.99 34 17.0 3.00 - 3.99 27 13.5 ”.00 - ”099 7 3.5 5.00 - 5.99 8 4.0 6.00 - 6.99 1 .5 7.00 - 7.99 0 .. 8.00 - 8.99 2 1.0 9.00 - 9.99 O .. 10.00 and more 3 1.5 Table 9 above represents the money spent on recrea- tional activities by the respondents each week. One hundred seventy-three (88%) spend three dollars or less each week on recreational activities. This is the money the respon- 14 dents spend being admitted to sport activities or paying n . . O .. m 1. n 1 .t t .1 t a m c a. c h Ad n e .1 t n .1 a I... P d a e o d a e e b .4... w n me o l ’ C I r as .d a m. m “w m. P n r e o m s an... v ) a t t v. .. O C a a .t o .1 n4 . 6 MH r b l e O r t o. m h . w o p. - +0 0/ .t e S s H“ "y t. r .t 134! .1 RH”. I. :LIDLV linu- w) 0n MH— Pnnoamun .0 are P g. Hanan—flung Fog Comb mmmuowfimu 9023a E. HZHmeww>w< HO>Z meGmma _ s 0 cm ) .w Le .a S no MW 1. f 0 e a e a .1 S p 9 MW... S p 8 Z r 0/ .d n +0 . .w .. m e S a e /\ n 0 iv 0 V gm V a .1 n g n C a m .1 n . n o . 1. He m r e we .1 n D a 1 O n .1 ..J t t n e n .1 S~ .1 l .1 W n a t e 1 r .m 1 k s m e n a m W V... .1. O n d % S t 0 e b T a v e n r S r .o n e a r 1. a. o o as a O h“ T. e 1. a D. r D. n .1 s m t h t a s h w. a .1. e o e t v r S 1 1 fl .. .19 ab . -8.-o r. so .1 1e- no 630 o. «ea—ea: H 0 is... .L. n 2...... flaw». .U . , ._ H..... .12. 3-...-.2 m . H a? drag ”LUCAS. ... .m m; .u.mm man an. 0* .._.... ............1.rw m. 012m Jmhifl m5»:- Hu 3 P. Lu. .CK 006.. H.. Wm . H.. H.“ . >552. A01 vodofinfl 3:0. «or Spa <08; . L. 'r. .-.. . fl». JU.‘ Add» b Du E. 2:33. on: H50 :33. Shawn m. goon .2. “Coachman— gone-v 230—. Ramon. Edna h annoy 4:81.56. 1.7....qu H. 11m... a1 Lac 9: van HH :2 m ngm ewes stH; an. m :.m a: H .uaa a. n a” .r n..». 3‘ $5.. .. ,. (wind ULS-....J.._.L .1. — 3 21.. . H.\.w .. fifr.” U L. “PHVMHP V H-...V. (N m w... HU:. . e3. [#55 LG 42315.5 Ace 3:30 0* «$2.252 .. _ L._ . ma Lanna... L. L. 1.. .<. . mg aw." DES—Q ~93 Cranes a fiL Egon *0... u Ugo non. USN angina no. venison « D wmmaOdHOZm" D «2 E... F E55 on: E bonfnmnnfincuo Eon: 3.3.3 agzwmromg vain; no“; a 00% noon no. oxnoea u Zamoaaee