' l ‘. . - . .5": } MAXIMAL WORK CAPACiTY AS RELATED TO STRENGTH, BODY CQMPOSITION, AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY EN YOUNG WOMEN Thesis for the Degree- of M. A. MICHIGAN STATE UNWERSIW Doris Darwick 1964 4| Ll! mu; @9111;qu M M "M "1mm 1m L I B R A R Y Michigan Stave University MAXIMAL WORK CAPACITY AS RELATED TO STRENGTH, BODY COMPOSITION, AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IN YOUNG WOMEN By Doris Darwick AN ABSTRACT OF A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Department of Health, Physical Education, and Recreation 1964 Approved ‘§§4:XREjAJCAAA) laggl‘ K3 ABSTRACT MAXIMAL WORK CAPACITY AS RELATED TO STRENGTH, BODY COMPOSITION, AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IN YOUNG WOMEN by Doris Darwick The relationship of physical activity, strength, and ioodgr composition to the maximal work capacity of young wonmnq was studied. Twenty—eight college women, age 18 to 22, twere measured to determine their: (a) body composition In; assessing body fat and calculating fat-free body weight from.the predicted specific gravity, (b) habitual physical activity by means of an activity history recall question- naire, (c) strength using the cable tensiometer in the measurement of eleven positions, and (d) maximal work capacity by determining the maximal oxygen consumption in a graded treadmill test. Gross body weight and fat—free body weight were found to correlate .6“ (r) with maximal oxygen consumption. Body weight and fat-free body weight correlated .69 and .62, respectively, with the daily caloric expenditure estimated from the recall questionnaire data. Maximal oxygen intake correlated .51 with hip flexion and .50 with knee extension. The best strength measures to indicate total strength were hip flexion (.88), knee extension (.84), and elbow flexion (.83). Doris Darwick Active subjects as rated from the recall questionnaire werma: (a) heavier and possessed a greater fat-free body vmeight, (b) found to expend more energy per day, (0) capable of higher maximal oxygen consumptions, and (d) stronger in total and trunk extension strength. Physical education majors as a group had higher fat- free body weights, expended more energy per day, were capable of higher maximal oxygen intakes, and were consis- tently stronger than the non—physical education majors. MAXIMAL WORK CAPACITY AS RELATED TO STRENGTH, BODY COMPOSITION, AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IN YOUNG WOMEN By Doris Darwick A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Department of Health, Physical Education, and Education 1964 ACKNOWLEDGMENT The author wishes to extend sincere thanks to Dr. Janet A. Wessel for her invaluable assistance and encouragement. DEDICATION Dedicated to my family for their love, faith, and prayers. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter I. INTRODUCTION Purpose of the Study Need for the Study Limitations of the Study Definition of Terms. II. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE Studies Concerning Methods for Determin— ing Body Composition and Specific Gravity. Studies Concerning Maximal Oxygen Consumption as Related to Body Composition Studies Concerning Methods and Procedures for Determining Maximal Oxygen Consumption Studies Concerning Responses to Maximal Work Capacity of Men and Women Studies Concerning Responses to Maximal Work Capacity of Men Studies Concerning Maximal Work Capacity as Related to Physical Activity. A III. METHODOLOGY Subjects Page broom N IO 14 17* 20' 27 29 Chapter Test Procedures and Data Obtained Anthropometric Measurements Physical Activity Metabolic and Heart Rate Techniques Cable Tension Strength. IV. ANALYSIS OF DATA. Description of Subjects and Comparative Data. Interrelationships of Parameters Analysis of Variance V. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS Summary. Conclusions Recommendations BIBLIOGRAPHY APPENDICES. Appendix A. Raw Data on Physical Characteristics of Subjects, Body Composition, Physical Activity, Maximal Work Capacity, and Strength Appendix B. Data Sheets Used to Record and Calcu- late Maximal Work Capacity, Body Composition, and Strength Appendix C. Formulas Used to Compute Specific Gravity, Per Cent Fat, Fat—Free Body Weight, and Ponderal Index Page 29 30 32 33 37 50 50 56 6A 110 110 111 116 117 122 123 130 133 Table II. III. IV. VI. VII. VIII. IX. XI. XII. LIST OF TABLES Weight, Per Cent Body Fat, and Specific Gravity as Determined in Young's Study. Metabolic Responses Aerobic Work Capacity, Oxygen 1; ml/kg. Subject General Description, Body Composition and Predicted Specific Gravity of Young's Study as Compared with the Present Study Metabolic Responses to Maximal Work Capacity of Test One as Compared to the Retest Mean Metabolic Responses to Maximal Work of the Present Study as Compared to Other Studies on Women Maximal Work Capacity as Correlated with Body Composition of the Present Study as Com— pared with Other Studies Cable Tension Strength in Kilograms. Inter-correlation Matrix of All Variables. Daily Caloric Expenditure of Group I, Group II, and Total Subjects Analysis of Variance of Per Cent Body Fat in Group I Analysis of Variance of Body Weight in Kilograms in Group I. Page l8 19 51 53 SA 55 56 57 65 72 72 vii Table Page XIIIL. Analysis of Variance of Fat—Free Body Weight in Kilograms in Group I . . . . . . . 73 XIV. Analysis of Variance of Standing Height (in Centimeters) in Group I . . . . . . . 73 XV. Analysis of Variance of Ponderal Index in Group I . . . . . . . . . . . . 7A XVI. Analysis of Variance of Calorix Expenditure (One Day Average) in Group I . °. . . . 7A XVII. Analysis of Variance of Maximal Oxygen Uptake in Liters Per Minute in Group I . . . . 75 XVIII. Analysis of Variance of Maximal Oxygen Uptake Per Kilogram of Body Weight in Liters Per Minute in Group I . . . . . . . . . 75 XIX. Analysis of Variance of Maximal Oxygen Uptake Per Kilogram of Fat—Free Body Weight in Liters Per Minute in Group I . . . . . 76 XX. Analysis of Variance of Time (in Minutes) of Maximal Oxygen Uptake Attainment in Group I 76 XXI. Analysis of Variance of the Heart Rate Simultaneous with the Maximal Oxygen Uptake Attainment in Group I . . . . . 77 XXII. Analysis of Variance of the Heart Rate of the Last Minute on the Treadmill in Group I. . 77 XXIII. Analysis of Variance of the Total Treadmill Time (in Minutes) in Group I . . . . . 78 Table XXIV. XXV. XXVI. XXVII. XXVIII. XXIX. XXX. XXXI. XXXII. XXXIII. XXXIV. XXXV. XXXVI, viii Page Analysis of Variance of Total Strength in Group I 78 Analysis of Variance of Hip Flexion Strength in Group I . 79 Analysis of Variance of Hip Extension Strength in Group I 79 Analysis of Variance of Knee Extension Strength in Group I 80 Analysis of Variance of Shoulder Extension Strength in Group I 80 Analysis of Variance of Elbow Extension Strength in Group I 81 Analysis of Variance of Elbow Flexion Strength in Group I 81 Analysis of Variance of Ankle Extension Strength in Group I 82 Analysis of Variance of Shoulder Horizontal Flexion Strength in Group I . . . . . 82 Analysis of Variance of Shoulder Flexion Strength in Group I 83 Analysis of Variance of Trunk Flexion Strength in Group I 83 Analysis of Variance of Trunk Extension Strength in Group I 8“ Analysis of Variance of Per Cent Body Fat in Group II. 8” Table XXXVII. XXXVIII. XXXIX. XL. XLI. XLII. XLIII. XLIV. XLV. XLVI. XLVII. Analysis of Variance of Body Weight in Kilograms in Group II Analysis of Variance of Fat-Free Body Weight in Kilograms in Group II Analysis of Variance of Standing Height (in Centimeters) in Group II Analysis of Variance of Ponderal Index in Group II Analysis of Variance of Caloric Expenditure (One Day Average) in Group II Analysis of Variance of Maximal Oxygen Uptake in Liters Per Minute in Group II Analysis of Variance of Maximal Oxygen Uptake Per Kilogram of Body Weight in Liters Per Minutes in Groups II Analysis of Variance of Maximal Oxygen Uptake Per Kilogram of Fat—Free Body Weight in Liters Per Minute in Group II Analysis of Variance of Time (in Minutes) of Maximal Oxygen Uptake Attainment in Group II Analysis of Variance of the Heart Rate Simultaneous with Maximal Oxygen Uptake Attainment in Group II. Analysis of Variance of the Heart Rate of the Last Minute on the Treadmill in Group II ix Page 85 85 86 86 87 87 88 88 89 89 9O Table XLVIII. XLIX. LI. LII. LIII. LIV. LV. LVI. LVII. LVIII. LIX. LX. Analysis of Time (in Analysis of Group II Analysis of in Group Analysis of in Group Analysis of Strength Analysis of Strength Analysis of Strength Analysis of Strength Analysis of Strength Analysis of Variance Minutes) Variance Variance II Variance II Variance in Group Variance in Group Variance in Group Variance in Group Variance in Group Variance of in of of of of II of II of II of II of II of the Total Treadmill Group II Total Strength in Hip Flexion Strength Hip Extension Strength Knee Extension Shoulder Extension Elbow Extension Elbow Flexion Ankle Extension Shoulder Horizontal Flexion Strength in Group II Analysis of Strength Analysis of Strength Analysis of Strength Variance of Shoulder Flexion in Group Variance in Group Variance in Group II of II of II Trunk Flexion Trunk Extension Page 90 91 91 92 92 93 93 9A 9A 95 95 96 96 xi Table Page XLI. Analysis of Variance of Per Cent Body Fat in Group III . . . . . . . . . . 97 XLII. Analysis of Variance of Body Weight in Kilograms in Group III. . . . . . . 97 XLIII. Analysis of Variance of Fat-Free Body Weight in Kilograms in Group III. . . . . . 98 LXIV. Analysis of Variance of Standing Height (in Centimbers) in Group III . . . . . . 98 LXV. Analysis of Variance of Ponderal Index in Group III . . . . . . . . . . . 99 LXVI. Analysis of Variance of Caloric Expenditure (One Day Average) in Group III . . . . 99 LXVII. Analysis of Variance of Maximal Oxygen Uptake in Liters Per Minute in Group III . . . 100 IXVIII. Analysis of Variance of Maximal Oxygen Uptake Per Kilogram of Body Weight in Liters Per Minute in Group III. . . . . . . . 100 LXIX. Analysis of Variance of Maximal Oxygen Uptake Per Kilogram of Fat-Free Body-Weight in Liters Per Minute in Group III . . . . 101 LXX. Analysis of Variance of Time (in Minutes) of Maximal Oxygen Uptake Attainment in Group III . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 LXXI. Analysis of Variance of the Heart Rate Simultaneous with the Maximal Oxygen Uptake Attainment in Group III . . . . 102 Table LXXII. LXXIII. LXXIV. LXXV. LXXVI. LXXVII. LXXVIII. LXXIX. LXXX. LXXXI. LXXXII. LXXXIII. LXXXIV. Analysis of Variance of the Heart Rate of the Last Minute on the Treadmill of Group III. Analysis of Variance of the Total Treadmill Time (in Minutes) in Group III Analysis of Group III Analysis of in Group Analysis of Strength Analysis of Strength Analysis of Strength Analysis of Strength Analysis of Strength Analysis of Strength Analysis of Variance Variance III Variance in Group Variance in Group Variance in Group Variance in Group Variance in Group Variance in Group Variance of Total Strength in of Hip Flexion Strength of Hip Extension III of Knee Extension III of Shoulder Extension III of Elbow Extension III of Ankle Extension III of Elbow Flexion III . . . . . . '. of Shoulder Horizontal Flexion Strength in Group III. Analysis of Variance of Shoulder Flexion Strength in Group III Analysis of Variance of Trunk Flexion Strength in Group III xii Page 102 103 103 10“ 10A 105 105 106 106 107 107 108 108 xiii Table Page LXXXV. Analysis of Variance of Trunk Extension Strength in Group III . . . . . . . 109 LXXXVI. Raw Date on Physical Characteristics of Subjects . . . . . . . . . . . 12A LXXXVII. Raw Data on Pubic Skinfold, Per Cent Body Fat, Fat—Free Body Weight, and Relative Weight . . . . . . . . . . . . 125 IAXXVIII. Raw Data on Predicted Specific Gravity, Ponderal Index, and Daily Caloric Expenditure . . . . . . . . . . 126 IXXXIX. Raw Data on Strength . . . . . . . . 127 XC. Raw Data on Test One Metabolic Responses. . 128 XCI. Raw Data on Retest Metabolic Responses . . 129 Figures J: \OCDNIOW 10. 11. 12. 13. 1A. 15. 16. LIST OF FIGURES Shoulder Extension Elbow Extension Ankle Plantar Flexion Elbow Flexion. Shoulder Horizontal Flexion Hip Flexion Hip Extension. Shoulder Flexion. Trunk Flexion. Trunk Extension Knee Extension Elementary Linkage Analysis: Type I Elementary Linkage Analysis: Type II. Elementary Linkage Analysis: Type III Elementary Linkage Analysis: Type IV. Elementary Linkage Analysis: Type V Page 39 A0 A1 A2 A3 AA A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 60 61 62 63 63 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION "And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.”l Oxygen is necessary not only to life itself but to every act of human perform- ance; mental and physical actions are dependent upon oxygen supply to the working tissues. Bard stated that "maximal oxygen consumption is probably the best single physiological indicator of a man's capacity for maintaining extremely hard work."2 According to Astrand and Rhyming, "the individ- ual's capacity: (or fitness) for heavy prolonged muscular work will first of all be dependent on the supply of oxygen to the working muscles. In types of work which engage large gwmps of muscle the limiting factor for the maximal oxygen intake (aerobic capacity) will probably be the capacity and n3 FEgulation of the oxygen transporting System. Astrand 1Genesis, 2:7. gPhillip Bard (ed.), Medical Physiology (11th ed.; St. Louis: The C. V. Mosby Company, l96l),p. A98. jP. O. Astrand and Irma Rhyming, "A Nonogram for Cal— 0ulation of Aerobic Capacity (Physical Fitness) from Pulse Rate During Submaximal Work," Journal of Applied Physiology, 7::l8, July, 195A to May, 1955. believes that ”it is of essential physiological interest to know a) the maximal activity level of the normal healthy human and how this level varies with sex and age; b) the factors normally limiting this upper level and, therefore, the physical performance.”u As the human body is designed for action it is evident that physical work capacity should be assessed during muscular work; preferrably to determine maximal work during maximal performance. Because of natural endowed physical capacities and anatomical structure, performance, although relatively constant in one individual, varies considerably between individuals. It is apparent that sex, age, body composition, inherent skills, and similar factors all influence the physical work capacity of the individual. Just what level of physical work capacity is necessary and/or desirable for general health is not yet known. It is generally agreed, however, that an individual should possess a work capacity level above that which is necessary to carry on their daily activities. It is the objective of this study to contribute to the better understanding of physical work capacity of young women and the individual variations as influenced by Strength, body composition, and physical activity. “P. O. Astrand, "Human Physical Fitness With Special Reference to Sex and Age," Physiological Reviews, 362380, July, 1955. Purpose of the Study This study was designed with the intent of determining the relationship of physical activity, strength, and body composition to the maximal work capacity of young women. In order to realize this purpose four main objectives were selected: 1. to determine maximal oxygen capacity of young women, 2. to determine the effect of body composition on maximal oxygen consumption, 3. to determine the relationship of strength and maximal oxygen consumption, and A. to determine the differences between active and less active individuals in relation to maximal oxygen consumption. Aged for the Study The literature reveals only a few studies on women concerning maximal work capacity as related to age and body Composition and none relating physical activity or strength t0 maximal work capacity. Contributions of basic informa— tion in the analysis of human biological individuality are eSsential if man is to gain: a. understanding of human difference, b. understanding of fitness and efficiency of performance, c. understanding of activity programs and procedures to increase the effectiveness thereof. Limitations of the Study Sample. 1. The number of subjects in the sample were limited to twenty-eight women. 2. All subjects were college women 18 to 22 years of age. 3. All subjects were volunteers. Techniques and procedures. l. The design of the study was limited in that each of the subjects participating could not follow a definite order and sequence in testing and re— testing. 2. The physical activity history recall questionnaire was based on the subjects individual record of activities for a limited period of five days. 3. Very little research evidence was available on ways to assess maximal work capacity of women or levels of performance. Definition of Terms Per cent of standard weight (relative body weight).5 Per cent of standard weight was calculated by dividing the ¥ 5Build and Blood Pressure Study, 1959, Vol. I (Chicago: Society of Actuaries, 1959). predicted weight into the actual weight. The predicted weights were obtained from the Build and Blood Pressure Study. Predicted specific gravity.6 Specific gravity was predicted by using the following formula: Specific gravity = 1.0884 — .ooou23le - .0003A01Xl3 Where X1 = skinfold on mid-abdominal line halfway between the umbilicus and the pubis. (in mm) X13 = percentage "standard" weight (average weight per height and age). Per cent of fat of body weight.7 Body fat content was calculated from densiometrically determined specific gravity using the Rathbun and Pace formula: 100 (5.5A8 - 5.0AA) Specific Gravity Per cent fat = Fat-Free body weight. Fat-free body weight was com- puted by subtracting the calculated fat content from theubody Weight. Ponderal index. Ponderal index was computed by dividing height by the cube root of weight. Height 3\/ Weight 6Charlotte Young, Elizabeth Martine, Rosalinda Tensuan, and Joan Blondin, "Predicting Specific Gravity and Body Fat— nGss in Young Women," Journal of the American Dietetic Association, Ao:105, February, 1962. 7E. N. Rathbun and N. Pace, "Body Composition I," Journal of Biological Chemistry, 158:675, l9A5. Physical activity. All subjects completed an activity history recall questionnaire in which they recorded their activity for a consecutive five day period. Energy expendi— ture; i.e., physical activity, was determined by the compu- tation of the subject record. Maximal work Capacity. Maximal oxygen consumption was determined during a ”run” on the treadmill at 6 mph with a one per cent grade increase each minute until the subject was unable to continue. The "run” was preceded by a ten minute warm up "walk" at 3.5 mph on zero grade. CHAPTER II REVIEW OF LITERATURE In order to develop a complete review of the litera— ture pertaining to this study, it was necessary to consider several aspects of investigation. The several topics involved will be treated as separate areas of review and will appear under separate headings. Studies Concerning_Methods for Determining Body Composition and Specific Gravity Young8 and her associates reported a pilot study designed to obtain normative data on the lean body mass and fatness of a representative sampling of 9A Cornell University women 17 to 30 years of age. The authors were interested in Studying the interrelationships existing between estimates 0f lean body mass and/or adiposity based on determinations in each of body density, total body water, skinfold measure- ments, fat-pat measurements from soft tissue x-rays, anthro- pometric measures, creatine excretion, and basal oxygen Consumption. 8C. M. Young, M. E. Martin, M. McCarthy, M. J. Marniello, E. Harmuth, and J. Feyer, "Body Composition of Young Women," iggrnal of the American Dietetic Association, 38:332-3AO, April, 1961. The authors findings9 on body weight, fat—free body weight, per cent body fat, and Specific gravity are presented in Table I. TABLE I WEIGHT, PER CENT BODY FAT, AND SPECIFIC GRAVITY AS DETERMINED IN YOUNG'S STUDY Characteristic Range Mean S.D. Weight (kg) AA.ll — 76.20 58.96 6.AA5 Fat-free body weight (kg) 31.9A - 61.11 A2.15 6.073 Per cent body fat (Rathbun-Pace) 15.81 - 38.62 28.69 A.856 Specific gravity l.0217—1.0665 1.0A08 0.009A * The authors further stated that the "pubis" measure- ment correlated best of all measurements with both total Skinfold thickness(r=.90) and density (r= —.66). Young10 and her associates in a more recent article pUblished a predictive equation for specific gravity. Intercorrelations between skinfolds, with total skinfold thickness and with density, were obtained. Using the 9Ibid., p. 335. 10Young, et al., op. cit., 102—107. skinfold measurements obtained in their earlier study,11 linear regression equations were formulated to predict specific gravity. After numerous computations the authors found that when a standard weight was included as a variable there was no significant difference in predicting specific gravity using only one skinfold. The pubis skinfold used in this formula had the best correlation with both total skinfold thickness (r = .90) and density (r = —.66) as reported in the previous study. The following equation was formulated for predicting specific gravity.12 Specific gravity = 1.088A - .oooA23le —.ooo3A01X 13 When X1 = skinfold on the mid-abdominal line halfway between the umbilicus and the pubis (in mm). Xl3 = percentage "standard" weight (average weight per height and age). The correlation between determined and predicted Specific gravity based on this equation was r = .70; Standard deviation of differences was 0.0068 units. This Was found to be approximately 3.A per cent body weight as fat. llIbid. 12Ibid., p. 105. 10 Studies Concerning Maximal Oxygen Consumption as Related to Body Composition Mahadeva, Passmore, and Woolfl3 investigated the rela- tionship between energy expenditure during standardized walking and stepping, and weight, height, race, and sex in 50 subjects. Energy expenditure was found to be closely correlated with body weight, but was not significantly correlated with height, age, race, or sex. The authors concluded that in any physical activity in which a large proportion of energy expenditure is used to move the body the metabolic cost will be directly proportional to the body weight. Seltzerlu measured the oxygen intake of 3A male students, aged 20 to 38 years, during a maximal two to five minute run on the treadmill. The mean maximal oxygen uptake was 3.35 liters per minute. A number of anthropometric measurements were correlated with energy expenditure. Maximal oxygen uptake per minute correlated with stature (r = .59 and with weight (T = .88). 13K. Mahadeva, R. Passmore, and s. Woolf, "Individual Variations in the Metabolic Cost of Standardized Exercises: The Effects of Food, Age, Sex, and Race," Journal of Physio- lggy, 121 225—231, 1953. 1”Carl C. Seltzer, "Body Build and Oxygen Metabolism at Rest and During Exercise," American Journal of Physiologp, 129 1—13, 1940. 11 Buskirk and Taylor15 studied the relationships be- tween maximal oxygen intake and components of body composi— tion.' Fifty—nine young college students and soldiers participated in the experiment. The following correlation coefficients were obtained: maximal oxygen intake with body weight r .63, maximal oxygen intake with fat—free .85, maximal oxygen intake with "active body weight r tissue" r = 91, and maximal oxygen intake with blood volume r = .78. They defined "active tissue" as body weight minus estimated body fat (densitometry), thiocyanate space and bone mineral (7 per cent of fat-free body weight). The subjects were also divided into three groups of nine relatively sedentary students classified according to the percentage of body fat (less than 10, 10-25, and 25 and above). Each group was compared with respect to the maximal amount of oxygen used per minute per kilogram of fat-free body weight. The authors found no observable difference existing between the groups. Von Dobelnl6 investigated the relationships between maximal oxygen intake, total hemoglobin, and (body weight minus adipose tissue) 2/3. In all, 33 male and 32 female Subjects participated in the study. For each subject, 15E. Buskirk and H. Taylor, ”Relationships Between Maximal Oxygen Intake and Components of Body Composition," Federation Proceedings, 13:21, March-December, 195A. 16Wilhelm Vonlkflxahi,"Maximal Oxygen Intake, Body Size and Total Hemoglobin in Normal Man," Acta Physiologica §gandinavica, 38:193-199, September, 1956. 12 r“? otal hemoglobin, per cent fat based on hydrostatic weighing, and maximal oxygen consumption per unit of time was obtained. Maximal oxygen intake values were plotted against the respective values for body weight minus adipose tissue. A correlation coefficient of r = .76 was reported between (weight minus adipose tissue) 2/3 and maximal oxygen intake. Von Dobelnl7 administered a maximal oxygen uptake test to 35 men and 35 women to determine the differences in maximal oxygen uptake as related to body composition. The mean maximal uptake for men was 3.91 liters per minute and for the women 3.06 liters per minute. The mean weight of the men was 69.3 kilograms and of the women 62.8 kilograms; how— ever, the men at a ten per cent higher body weight attained a twenty—eight per cent higher maximal oxygen uptake than the women. Von Dobeln concluded that there was not a linear relationship between body Size and maximal oxygen intake. The author suggested that the difference in maximal metabolic rate between the sexes was due to the difference in the. hemoglobin content of the blood. The mean hemoglobin con- tent of the men was 1A.95 g/100 ml. and in the women l3.A7 0P ten per cent less. 17Wilhelm Von Dobeln, "Human Standard and Maximal NEtabolic Rate in Relation to Fat—Free Body Mass," Acta Efiysiologica Scandinavica, Vol. 37, Supplementum 126:3-38, l956. l3 Welch, Riendeau, Crisp, and Isensteinl8 studied the relationship of maximal oxygen consumption to various com— ponents of body composition in 28 healthy young men. The authors stated that on the basis of previous studies con— 19 and Von Dobeln,2O the ducted by Taylor and Buskirk, assumption was that oxygen was more highly related to lean tissue than to any other description of body composition. ”One can infer from the correlations reported that maximum oxygen consumption is dependent mainly on the amount of lean tissue in the body."21 The subjects used in this study were tested on the treadmill at grades of 6, 8.5, and 11 per cent. The time Of the runs was 2 minutes and A5 seconds. Maximal oxygen Consumption was considered to be attained when running at the next higher grade did not increase the maximal oxygen cOnsumption by more than 150 cc. above the previous grade. Significant correlations (P < 0.01) between maximal oxygen COnsumption in liters per minute and body weight (r = .59); body weight minus fat (r = .65); and body weight minus bone (P = .6A) were obtained. The authors emphasized that the 18B. E. Welch, a. P. Riendeau, C. E. Crisp, and R. S. ISenstein, "Relationship of Maximal Oxygen Consumption to Various Components of Body Composition,” Journal of Applied Physiology, 12:395-398, May, 1958. 19Taylor and Buskirk, loc. cit. 2OVon Dobeln, 21Welch, et al., loc. cit. 1A correlations obtained by Taylor and Buskirk,22 and Von Dobeln23 can be interpreted in that from 53 to 83 per cent of the variability in maximal oxygen consumption may be attributed to variations in the percentage of lean body mass. Welch and his associates concluded that the percen~ tage of fat in the body had no significant influence on the maximal oxygen consumption when expressed as either liters per ndnute or cubic centimeters per minute per kilogram of fat-free body weight. Significant differences were found when maximum oxygen consumption was expressed as cubic centimeters per minute per kilogram of weight. The authors suggested that although fat may not have an effect on the ability of the tissues to extract oxygen, it did have a Significant effect on the circulatory capacity of the individual. This was due to the fact that fat increased Weight, and therefore, the energy requirement. However, there was not a corresponding increase in the maximum OX.Ygen intake. Studies ConcerninggMethods and Procedures for Determining Maximal Oxygen Consumption Johnson, Brouha, and Darling2u discussed methods and procedures uSed to determine an adequate test of fitness 22Taylor and Buskirk, loc. cit. 23Von Dobeln, 2”R. E. Johnson, L. Brouha, and R. C. Darling," A Test of Physical Fitness for Strenuous Exertion," Revue Canadienne De Bilogic, 1:A9l—503, June, 19A2. 15 for strenuous exertion. The same investigators concluded that hard work must be used to determine hard work if hard work is in question as differences between fit and unfit individ— uals during submaximal work are arithmetically smaller at lower metabolic rates. The authors stated that the type of exercise used is not important provided that it: a. stresses the cardio—vascular system by involving large muscle groups, b. is of such intensity that it exhausts one-third of all the subjects within five minutes, and c. does not demand any unusual Skill for successful performance. The authors further postulate that all subjects should work at a rate linearly prOportional to their body weight. The reactions of the fit and unfit individual of the same Weight to the same maximal work differ in that the fit individual will consume more oxygen, attain a lower maximal heart rate, and will endure longer before reaching exhaustion. Taylor, Buskirk, and Henschel25 examined maximal Oxygen consumption methods and procedures by running several \— 25H. L. Taylor, E. Buskirk, and A. Henschel, "Maximal‘ Oxygen Intake as an Objective Measure of Cardio-Respiratory Performance," Journal of Applied Physiology, 8:73-80, July, 1955 to May, 19563 l6 eXperiments on the motor driven treadmill. Data was collected on 27 soldiers and A6 student males between the ages of 18 and 35. The warm—up consisted of walking at 3.5 mph on a 10 per cent grade for ten minutes to one hour. Within five minutes or less of completing the walk, the subject started running at 7 mph for three minutes. The subject repeated the test procedure on three successive days with a grade increase of 2.5 per cent each day. The authors found that using a constant speed (7 mph) and_increasing the grade in steps of 2—1/2 per cent was more satisfactory than using a constant grade and increasing the speed. The increase in oxygen consumption, associated with an increase of 2-1/2 per cent grade (below maximal Oxygen intake), was approximately 300 cc/minute. If the Oxygen intake at two different grades differed by less than 150 cc/minute or 2.1 cc/kgm of body weight per minute, they assumed that a maximal oxygen intake had been obtained. Increasing the working muscle mass by simultaneous running and arm work increased the maximal oxygen intake. Therefore the same investigators concluded that maximal Oxygen intake was only maximal under Specific working Conditions. The authors further postulate that after maximal Oxygen had been reached changes in Speed or grade of the treadmill did not change the oxygen intake. It appeared to the authors that as long as changes in grade running skill 17 did not change the muscle mass used for this purpose that maximal oxygen intake must be independent of skill. The coefficient of reliability for these procedures was 0.95 in 69 test—retest determinations. Studies ConcerninggRepponses to Maximal Work Capacity of Men and Women Metheny and associates26 determined physiologic. responses of men and women to strenuous work on the motor driven treadmill. The subjects consisted of 17 women be- tween the ages of 19 and 27 and 30 men between the ages of 19 and 23. The exercise consisted of running at 7 mph on an 8.6 per cent grade for five minutes or until unable to continue. During maximal work the average run for the women was only half that of the men before becoming exhausted. The women attained a maximal oxygenconsumption of A0.9 CC/kg/min., a maximal R.Q. of 1.06, and a maximal heart rate Of l97/min. The men attained 51.3 cc/kg/min., 1.1A, and l9A/min. respectively. In a study by Astrand27 AA physically active female Subjects 20 to 65 years of age were examined three to seven 26E. Metheny, L. Brouha, R. E. Johnson, and W. H. Forbes, "Some Physiologic Responses of Men and Women to Moderate and Strenuous Exercise: A Comparative Study," American Journal of Phyeiology, 137:318—326, August—November, 19A2. ' 27Irma Astrand, "Aerobic Work Capacity in Men and Women with Special Reference to Age," Acta Physiologdca Scandinavica, Vol. A9, Supplementdm, 169:11-87, 1960. 18 different days when cycling at submaximal to maximal loads. Heart rate, pulmonary ventilation, and oxygen uptake were determined during work and blood lactate concentration was measured after each work load. I. Astrand and P. O. Astrand administered various maximal work capacity tests to women of many ages. Metabolic responses concerning the age ranges pertinent to the present study are presented in Table II. TABLE II METABOLIC RESPONSES Number Maximal Maximal Maximal Age of 02 l/ 02 ml/ Heart Oxygen Subjects Minute kg/min. Rate Pulse 20-29 8 2.23 i .09 39.9:1.66 187 i 3.A 11.9 i .A5 20-25 P.O. 32 2.88 : .OA A8.A: .A9 199 i 1.8 -- Astrand 20—25 P.0. Astrand AA 2.90 i .0A A8.A: .50 198 i 1.5 -- 1952 ; Maximal oxygen uptake was indicated by: (a) an oxygen Uptake which did not increase despite a rising work load, but reached a level and/or two liters and (b) a blood lactate concentration which was high, 90—100 mg per 100 ml after work of at least four minutes duration. Oxygen uptake at l9 certain loads was somewhat smaller for younger subjects. Women had a lower oxygen uptake than men at a fixed work load but calculated mechanical efficiency was identical. At lower loads (300 rpm/minute) the mechanical efficiency was Significantly lower for older than younger subjects. Mechanical efficiency decreased from about twenty—five to eleven per cent when decreasing the load from A50 to 50 rpm per minute. A rectilinear relationship between oxygen uptake per minute and pulmonary ventilation per minute and also an approximate rectilinear relationship between heart rate and oxygen uptake per minute was found in all age groups. Astrand classified aerobic work capacity into norms to evaluate work capacity. The figures used to evaluate women of normal body weight aged 20-29 are presented in Table 111.28 TABLE III AEROBIC WORK CAPACITY, OXYGEN 1; ml/kg Low Fair Average Good High ; 1.69 1.70-1.99 2.00—2.A9 2.50-2.79 2.80 ; g 28 29—3A 35-A3 AA-AB A9 ; 28Ibid., p. 83. 20 Studies Concerning Responses to Maximal Work Capacity of Men Taylor29 administered a submaximal and maximal tread- mill test twice to 31 male college students ranging in age from 19 to 26. The test consisted of a four minute walk on the treadmill; 108 meters per minute at a grade of 5 per cent, and a run to exhaustion; 162 meters per minute set at the initial grade of 5 per cent elevated one per cent each minute until time of subject exhaustion. The test and re- test were three days apart. The mean maximal values attained were heart rate; 198 per minute, and oxygen in liters per minute; 3.A8. The test-retest correlations were r = .81 and F = .70 respectively. During the submaximal test per cent oxygen correlated DOSitively with time run while body weight and carbon dioxide were insignificantly correlated. However, the responses (heart rate, respiratory rate, ventilation, and blood lactate) to the maximal test were insignificantly correlated with time run. Taylor stated that this evidence reVealed that each subject ran to his individual maximal Value which had little relation to his fitness; the length of the time he was able to run being the essential value. In submaximal exercise the oxygen consumption cor- related with body weight r = .71 and with weight partialled 29Craig Taylor, "Some PrOperties of Maximal and Sub— maximal Exercise with Reference to Physiological Variation and the Measurement of Exercise Tolerance,” American {ggynal of Physiology, 142:200-212, August to December, l9AA. 21 out r = .23. In maximal exercise the oxygen consumption correlation dropped to r = .A3 and with weight partialled out rose to r = -.A6. Taylor concluded that in submaximal exercise oxygen consumption is chiefly a function of body weight and only slightly related to fitness but that in maximal exercise the relation with weight drops and the fitness criterion increases considerably. Heart rate and blood lactate were found to be the most reliable submaximal measures but were approximated in maximal work by per cent oxygen and oxygen consumption. Ventilation was of low reliability in both submaximal and maximal work, while respiration became highly reliable in the maximal exercise. C. Taylor30 determined the circulatory, respiratory, and metabolic responses of four male subjects (three physical education students with athletic experience and one com- DIEtely untrained) to a periodically increasing work—load on a bicycle ergometer set at 70 rpm. All experiments were Continued without interruption until the subject was forced to quit from exhaustion. On the approach to maximal levels there was no mahifest Sign of circulatory failure accompanying exhaustion; hoWever, failure of an adequate blood supply to certain 3OCraig Taylor, "Studies in Exercise Physiology," Amgggcan Journal of Physiology, 135:27—42, December 19A1- February, 19A2. 22 tissues was thought to possibly affect the onset of exhaus— tion. Total ventilation displayed a linear increase with work-load tending toward excessive acceleration at maximal levels. The rate of increase varied considerably between subjects but was fairly constant for each individual. Final ventilations ranged from A0 to 115 liters per minute. The rate of oxygen consumption was considered to be a highly Significant physiological variable not only because it represented the physiological cost of the work, but be- cause it gave evidence of the transport capacity of the circulatory and respiratory mechanisms. The oxygen consump- tion curve as related to work load was found to be a good measure of the efficiency of the subject. The trend of oxygen consumption at maximal levels was considered to be of great Significance because of the prevailing View that the ability to absorb oxygen is a limiting factor in an individual's physical performance. In Taylor's study oxygen consumption was by no means always deficient at exhaustion levels. In fact, in 50 per cent of the cases no deviation in the linear increase of oxygen intake occurred and in the remaining cases the value accelerated rather than declined. In the cases where the curve turned upward approaching exhaustion it was the opinion of the author that the effec— tiveness of the muscles performing the work had to lower to necessitate the mobilization of additional motor units to be able to sustain the rate of work. 23 The alveolar p002 and per cent CO2 in expired air both increased in the transition from rest to work and remained on a fluctuating plateau throughout most of the work range and declined sharply at exhaustion. These variables as well as ventilation were considered to be the most reliable signals of exhaustion onset. Wyndham and associates31 tested four highly trained men at various levels of work on the bicycle ergometer to attempt to determine the level at which maximal oxygen intake is attained and to compare the results with previous studies. The subjects warmed up for ten minutes at 3000 ft. lb/min. followed by a training run on the cycle set at 70 rpm at 7500 ft. lb/min. for thirty minutes each day. After the training run they worked to exhaustion at various levels of work between 9000 and 11,000 ft. lb/min. Training covered a period of four months. The maximal oxygen level remained constant over a number of months. The average coefficient of variation of heart rate of the four men at the same three levels of work was 3.5 per cent indicating that in trained men maximal heart rate is constant. 310. H. Wyndham, N. B. Strydom, J. S. Maritz, J. F. Morrison, J. Peter, and Z. U. Potgieter, "Maximum Oxygen Intake and Maximum Heart Rate During Strenuous Work," Journal of Applied Physiology, 1A:927-936, 1959. 2A There was a significant difference between the maximal observed heart rate of some of the men. The mean of the~ asymptote values was 178.3 beats per minute as compared to Astrand's32 mean heart rate for young men which was 19A.6 beats per minute. The authors found that after the maximal heart rate, and presumed maximal cardiac output was reached, that the oxygen uptake continued to rise. The same investigators considered this evidence that a small additional quantity of oxygen could be obtained from the circulating minute—volume of blood after the maximal cardiac output was attained. The authors discussed criterion used by other authors in the determination of an absolute level of maximal oxygen Uptake attainment and rejected them due to their own study results and conclusions. Wyndham and associates felt that there was not sufficient knowledge of the relationships between oxygen uptake and rate of work to accept with cer— tainty criteria for determining maximal oxygen intake attain— ment. chhneider33 tested 6 sedentary men on a bicycle ergometer carrying loads of 2000, A000, 6000, 8000, and. 32P. Astrand, Experimental Studies of Physical Working Capaciyy in Relation to Sex and Age.(COpenhagen: Munksgaard, 1952). 33E. C. Schneider, "A Study of Responses to Work on a Bicycle Ergometer," American Journal of Physiology, 97:353— 36A, April to July, 1931. 25 10,000 foot pounds at a set rate of 70 rpm's/minute. Preceding the experiment and between each work period of six to eight minutes the subject completely rested for twenty minutes. A linear relationship between oxygen consumption and work load was maintained during submaximal work; however, as work load increased the linear relationship was broken for four out of the six cases. Heart rate also maintained an approximate linear relationship to work load; however, it was found to vary from man to man. Beyond this oxygen uptake and heart rate responded to the load to a lesser degree than at submaximal loads. An overload was found to fail to increase oxygen uptake. Schneider considered this to be sufficient evidence to conclude that a load of work may be undertaken in which heart rate will also be unable to increase. Oxygen pulse rose.steadily with an increase in work load except for the heaviest loads. Some of the subjects made only a slight addition to the oxygen pulse upon reach- ing their maximum load but a few were able to increase beyond expectation even atthe heaviest loads. I Mitchell, Sproule, and Chapman34 administered a tread- mill test to determine the physiological meaning of the 3“J. H. Mitchell, 3. J. Sproule, and C. s. Chapman, "The Physiological Meaning of the Maximal Oxygen Intake Test," Journal of Clinical Investigation, 37:538-5A7, 1958. 26 maximal oxygen intake to 65 normal men. Subjects warmed up for ten minutes at 3 mph on a 10 jper cent grade which was followed by a ten minute rest period. After the rest the subject ran at 6 mph at zero grade for 2—1/2 minutes. After another ten minute rest period the grade was raised 2-1/2 per cent (speed remaining at 6 mph) and the procedure was repeated. This procedure continued until oxygen intake per minute leveled off. Maximal intake was taken at the point at which the oxygen intake curve ceased to rise. In 72 per cent of the cases oxygen intake either remained the same or declined when work load was increased beyond this intake. Because of a relatively slight rise in some cases a final value of 5A ml or a rise of less than 1A2 minus 88 ml per minute was accepted as the criterion to determine at which point maximal oxygen intake was attained. The mean maximal oxygen intake was 3.22 liters : 0.A6 per minute and the mean maximal heart rate was 187 i 10 per minute. Robinson35 administered a treadmill test to 93 normal non-athletic males ranging in age from 6 to 91 years to study the interrelations of age, basal heart rate, and the adaptation of heart rate work to various levels of work. The subjects walked for fifteen minutes at 5.6 mph on an vBSSid-RObinson, "Experimental Studies of Physical Fitness in Relation to Age," Arbeitsphysiologie, 10:251- 323, 1938. 27 8.6 per cent grade. After a ten minute rest they ran at a rate which exhausted them in two to five minutes. Men aged 20 to 29 attained an average maximal heart rate of 189 beats per minute as compared to a mean of 19536 and ranges of 17A to 192 (men) and 168 to 192 (women)37 of comparable studies. The mean maximal oxygen consumption of subjects 18 years of age was 3.61 liters per minute and of subjects 25 years of age 3.56 liters per minute. Spudies Concerninngaximal Work Capacity pg Related to Physical Activity Knehr, Dill, and Neufield38 performed a study on 1A college men over a period of six months. Data were collected before and during the training period for subjects working to maximum on the motor driven treadmill. The subjects walked for eight minutes at 3.5 mph on an 8.6 per cent grade and then immediately ran on the same grade, or a higher grade, at 7 mph for five minutes or until exhausted. The same investigators found a mean increase of 60 Per cent in work done due to greater use of anaerobic mecha nisms for energy transformation as evidenced by an increased 36D. B. Dill and L. Brouha, Travail Humain, 5:1, 1937. 37E. H. Christensen, ArbeitSphgsiologiej‘ A:A53, 1931. 38C. A. Kneur, D. s. Dill, and w. Neufield, "Training and Its Effects on Man at Rest and at Work," American Journal of Physiology, 136:1A8-155, March-July, 19A2. maximal oxygen intake. This was indicated by increased lactate tolerance and an increased oxygen debt. The authors concluded that the capacity to accumulate lactate runs parallel with and furnishes an excellent index to cardiovascular fitness. There was also an increase in oxygen transport to the working tissues which represented a gain in aerobic work capacity. 39 , in a review of the literature, summarized Astrand the effects of training evident during maximal work. The effects of training are: a. An unchanged maximal heart rate, b. An increased aerobic capacity, c. An increased oxygen debt capacity, d. An increased capacity for supplying oxygen to the tissues, e. An increased utilization of anaerobic reserves, f. An increased lactic acid capacity, and g. An increased blood sugar level. 39Astrand, "Human Physical Fitness with . . . , loc. cit. 28 CHAPTER III METHODOLOGY To determine the relationship of body composition, strength, and habitual physical activity to maximal oxygen consumption in young college women the following methods and procedures were followed. Subjects The 28 women used in this experiment were under- graduate students at Michigan State University between the ages of 18 and 22. The majority of the women were fresh- men, 17 of which were physical education majors and 11 which were non—majors attending instructional classes in physical education. They did not represent a random Sample of young women Since they were selected on a Volunteer basis with an attempt to select subjects repre- sentative of different levels of habitual physical activity. All subjects were examined by the university hospital and were considered to be of good health. Tgst Procedures and Data Obtained Data collection covered a period of approximately five months. Measurements on each subject were completed in two testing periods of an approximate length of one hour each. Subjects were tested five days a week 30 beginning at 7:00 A.M. and ending at 5:00 P.M. All metabo- lic data were collected in the A.M. from 7:00 to 12:00 Noon. Anthropometric Measurements The procedures followed for these measurements were taken from the instructions issued by the Committee on Nutritional Anthropometry of the Food and Nutrition Board of the National Research Council.140 Height. The subject removed Shoes; stood with her back against the calibration on the stadiometer; heels, hips, shoulders, and head touching the backboard. The head was erect with the chin tucked in slightly. The subject stood as tall as possible. The square was placed against the calibration on the backboard above the head of the subject. It was brought down until it fitted firmly against the top Of the subject's head. The reading was taken at the lower Edge of the square. Height was recorded to the nearest one- half centimeter. Weight. The subjects were weighed without shoes in Standardized dress of bermudas, blouse, and socks. Weight was recorded to the nearest half—kilogram. uOCommittee on Nutritional Anthropometry of the Food and Nutrition Board, Nutritional Research Council, in dey Measurements and Human Nutrition, J. Brozek, editor (Detroit: Wayne University Press, 1956). 31 Per cent of standard weight (relative weight). Per cent standard weight was calculated by dividing the pre- dicted weight into the actual weight. The predicted weights were obtained from the Build and Blood Pressure Study.ul The standard weight figures in the Build and Blood Pressure Study included shoe heel height of about two inches and usual indoor clothing, which on women approxi— mates four to six pounds. In order to make the figures in this study comparable the average heel height of one inch was added to each height and two pounds added to the weight to cover the extra clothing. Pubic skinfold. The pubic skinfold site is located on the mid—abdominal line halfway between the umbilicus and the pubis. The skinfold was grasped between the thumb and index finger in the vertical plane of the body. The Size of the skinfold was enough to include two thicknesses Of skin and subcutaneous fat but no fascia. The application of the Lange* Calipers was about 1 cm. from the fingers and at a depth approximately equal to the thickness of the fold. Three successive measurements were ulBuild and Blood Pressure Study, pp. cit. *Werna-Gren Aeronautical Research Laboratory, Kentucky Research Foundation, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky. 32 taken on the right side of the body while the subject was in a supine position. The three measurements were averaged and recorded in mm. Predicted Specific gravity. Predicted specific gravity was obtained by the use of the prediction formulas devised by Young and her associates.”2 The pubis skinfold measurement and the per cent of standard weight were based on the predicted weight for age and height as determined by the Build and Body Structure Study. Per cent fat of body weight. Per cent fat of body A3 weight was derived from the Rathbun and Pace formula using specific gravity figures. Physical Activipy All subjects completed an activity history recall questionnaire in which they recorded their activity for a Consecutive five day period. Energy expenditure, i.e., physical activity, was determined by computing the activity in terms of calories per hour per body weight. The subjects Were listed in rank order according to the total energy eXpended in activity over the five day period. A QE‘_—i£5Young§uet al.,"Body Composition of Young Women,” -C.,p - A3 Rathbun and Pace, pp, cit., p. 675. 33 Metabolic and Heart Rate Techniques The maximal work capacity test. Subjects began walking on the Reeves motor driven treadmill at 3.5 mph on zero grade for ten minutes. During this ten minute "warm up" period oxygen was not collected nor heart rate recorded. .During , the last thirty seconds of the walk the subject was connected to a Collins plastic triple "J" high velocity valve by means of a rubber mouthpiece with the nose being completely closed with a nasal clamp. At the end of the tenth minute the treadmill speed was increased to 6 mph (without interrupting the experiment) to begin the "run." At the completion of each minute of the "run” the grade was raised one per cent until the subject was unable to continue. The speed remained constant at 6 mph throughout the "run." Subject dress. The subjects wore standardized dress Of bermuda shorts, blouse, athletic socks, and tennis shoes. Electrode placement. The chest—back type electrodes Were used to record heart rate during the "run." The three Sites of electrode placement were: a. On the chest: one inch above and to the center of the left breast, b. On the chest: one inch below and to the center of the left breast, and c. On the back: parallel with the lower chest 3A electrode and three inches to the left of the spinal column. Cramer Tuf—skin was applied to the skin site and then roughed with paper toweling to insure electrode placement. A small area (the size of the electrode) was scraped clear of tuf-skin at the exact spot of the electrode placement. The inner cap of the placement side of the electrode was thinly covered with Sanborn Redux Electrode paste before placing the electrode in the cleared area of the site. Johnson and Johnson one inch waterproof adhesive tape was then placed over the electrode to stabilize it. The center of the three inch strip of tape was placed on the electrode and held in place as one Side of the tape was stretched and secured to the side of the electrode and then the same pro— cedure was repeated to secure the other side of the tape. DUke elastoplast (a four inch square) was stretched and placed over the tape and electrode to prevent the tape from loosening or curling due to body perspiration during activity. The electrode lines were then brought toward the left ShOulder, straight but with slight slack, looped, and Secured to the Shoulder with adhesive tape. The cord eXtended through the collar of the blouse and was inserted into the Sanborn portable electrocardiograph recorder. Supject directions. The subject was directed to walk and run using her natural stride and to attempt to focus on a point directly ahead of her. It was emphasized that an 35 all out performance would be necessary for the experiment to be successful. The nose clip and mouthpiece were posi— tioned to give Iher the proper feel of the equipment. (The valve was adjusted to her height by raising or lowering the valve attached by a rubber hose clamped over an overhead ceiling bar.) All subjects were able to adjust to the treadmill during the ten minute warm up walk and had no difficulty adapting to the speed change of the run. Experimentyprocedures. Seven persons were necessary to administer the all out test on the treadmill. Each testor had a specific responsibility during the all out run. The jobs consisted of: a. Operating the Reeves motor driven treadmill: to regulate the speed at 3.5 mph for the ten minute walk on zero grade and at 6 mph during the run with a one per cent grade increase each minute; b. Operating the Sanborn portable electrocardiograph and twin visa recorder: recording heart rate and calling a 5 second count down at the end of each thirty seconds; c. Exchanging the Douglas gas bags each thirty seconds; d. Standing along side of, encouraging, and watching the subject for signs of impending exhaustion; e. Transporting the Douglas gas bags to the person 36 Operating the Fisher gas partioner and the Beckman infared 02 analyzer; Operating the Fisher gas partioner and the Beckman infared 02 analyzer: to analyze the expired air for carbon dioxide and oxygen content, and Operating the Kofranyi meter: to determine the temperature and volume of the gas metered. Calculated maximal work capacity data. The following data were calculated: 8.. b. Maximal oxygen uptake in liters per minute, Maximal oxygen uptake per kilogram of body weight in liters per minute, Maximal oxygen uptake per kilogram of fat—free body weight in liters per minute, Time (in minutes) of maximal oxygen uptake attainment, Heart rate simultaneous with the maximal oxygen uptake attainment, Heart rate of the last minute on the treadmill, Total treadmill time (in minutes), Exercise R.Q. simultaneous with maximal oxygen attainment, Maximal R.Q., Oxygen pulse, 37 Determination of maximal oxygen attainment. The thirty second gas bags (necessary due to the smallness of the bags available) were analyzed and the readings combined to determine one minute oxygen per kilogram of body weight calculations. The criteria for determining maximal oxygen consumption was the same as used by Taylor.uu Taylor stated that "if the oxygen intake at two different grades differs by less than 150 cc/min. or 2.1 cc/kg of body weight, it can be safely assumed that the maximal oxygen has been attained." In the present study maximal oxygen consumption did not Show in the same way for all subjects. In thirteen of the cases maximal oxygen rose to a peak followed by a decline and in the remaining fifteen cases it rose upward and then leveled off. In those cases where there was a peak followed by a decline maximal oxygen was taken at the peak minute. In those cases where the oxygen consumption leveled off and was relatively constant over the previous minute maximal oxygen Consumption was taken in the minute where there was no further increase over .00150 liters per minute. Cable Tension Strength Eleven strength measures were determined by use of the Cable tensiometer. The strength measures included: uuTaylor, et al., 0p. cit., p. 79. 38 a. Shoulder Extension b. Elbow Extension c. Ankle Extension d. Elbow Flexion e. Shoulder Horizontal Flexion f. Hip Flexion g. Hip Extension h. Shoulder Flexion i. Trunk Flexion j. Trunk Extension k. Knee Extension The measures were taken at least twice at each site according to instructions outlined by Clarke?5 If the second measure differed from the first by more than 2.0 points additional measures were made until two of the measures differed by not more than 2.0 kg when corrected. The first of the two measures differing by not more than 2.0 kg were averaged and recorded. Directions and diagrams for subject positioning and, Cable tensiometer attachments as taken from Clarke's)46 manual of cable tension strength tests are reprinted here With permission granted by personal communication with the author. ”5H. Harrison Clarke, A Manual: Cable Tension Strength Tests (Chicopee: Brown-Murphy Company, 1953). u6Ibid. 39 A7 Shoulder Extension. Starting Position a. Subject in supine lying position; hips and knees flexed, feet resting on table; free hand resting on chest. b. Upper arm on side tested adducted at Shoulder to 180 degrees; shoulder flexed to 90 degrees; elbow flexed with wrist in prone position. Attachments a. Regulation strap around humerus midway between shoulder and elbow joints. b. Pulling assembly attached to wall at subject's head. Precautions a. Prevent shoulder elevation by bracing with hand. b. Prevent humerus abduction by guiding elbow. Objectivity coefficients: 0.97 Figure l. Shoulder Extension ”71bid., pp. 17—18. A0 Elbow Extension. Starting Position a. Same as for Elbow Flexion, except elbow is in A0 degrees flexion. Attachments a. Regulation strap around forearm midway between wrist and elbow joints. b. Pulling assembly hooked to wall below subject's head. Precautions a. Prevent shoulder elevation by bracing. b. Prevent raising elbow and abudcting upper arm by bracing elbow to side. c. Require subject to keep head straight so as to reduce tendency to flex the Spine laterally. Objectivity coefficient: 0.9A — A? Figure 2. Elbow Extension u8Ibid., pp. 16 and 18. Al Ankle Plantar Flexion.)49 Starting Position a. Subject in supine position; hips in 180 degrees extension and adduction; knees in 180 degrees extensions; arms folded on chest. b. Ankle on Side tested is in 90 degrees plantar flexion. Attachments a. Regulation strap around food above metatarsa1~ phalangeal joint. b. Pulling assembly attached to wall at subject's head. Precautions a. Prevent: inversion or eversion at ankle joint, extension of metatarsal~phalangea1 joint; and raising of leg. b. Brace behind Shoulders to stabalize subject. Objectivity coefficient: 0.93 Q l_cQ? ”ML Figure 3. Ankle Plantar Flexion uglbid., pp. 30—31. A2 50 Elbow Flexion. Starting Position a. Subject in supine lying position, hips and knees flexed, feet resting on table, free hand resting on chest. b. Upper arm on side tested adducted and extended at shoulder to 180 degrees; elbow in 115 degrees flexion; forearm in mid-prone supine position. Attachments a. Regulation strap around forearm mid-way between wrist and elbow joints. b. Pulling assembly hooked at wall at subject's feet. Precautions a. Prevent raising elbow and abducting upper arm by bracing at elbow. Objectivity coefficient: 0.95 Figure A. Elbow Flexion 50Ibid., pp. 16 and 18. Shoulder Horizontal Flexion. A3 51 Starting Position Subject in supine lying position; hips in 180 a. degrees extension and adduction; knees fully extended; free hand on chest. b. Upper arm on side tested flexed at shoulder to 90 degrees; elbow flexed to 90 degrees; forearm directly across body in mid-prone-supine position. Attachments a. Regulation strap around humerus midway between Shoulder and elbow joints. b. Pulling assembly attached to wall away from body. Precautions a. Prevent trunk from lateral flexion and shoulders from lifting by bracing; require subject to keep head straight. b. Steady subject's arm in testing position by holding. Objectivity coefficient: 0.93 Figure 5. Shoulder Horizontal Flexion 51Ibid., pp. 17—19. AA 52 Hip Flexion. Starting Position a. Subject in supine lying position; hip and knee of free leg flexed with foot resting on table; arms folded on chest. b. Hip and knee of leg being tested extended and adducted to 180 degrees. Attachments a. Regulation strap around thigh, lower third between hip and knee joints. b. Pulling assembly attached beneath subject through slit in table. Precautions a. Prevent lifting of shoulders by bracing. Objectivity coefficient: 0.90 "I ‘K/ \\\ - / Figure 6. Hip Flexion 52Ibid., pp. 2A-25. A5 53 Hip Extension. Starting Position a. Subject in prone lying position; hip in 180 degrees extension and adduction; knees fully extended; arms along sides of body. Attachments a. Regulation strap around thigh, lower third between hip and knee joints. b. Pulling assembly attached beneath subject through Slit in table. Precautions a. Prevent lifting of hips by bracing. Objectivity coefficient: 0.9A Figure 7. Hip Extension -~_~_‘~_ S3Ibid., pp. 25—26. \ A6 Shoulder Flexion.Su Starting Position a. Subject in supine lying position, hips and knees flexed, feet resting on table; free hand resting on chest. b. Upper arm on side tested adducted at Shoulder to 180 degrees; shoulder flexed to 180 degrees; elbow in 90 degrees flexion. Attachments a. Regulation strap around humerus mid-way between shoulder and elbow joints. b. Pulling assembly hooked to cross piece below subject's arm. Precautions a. Prevent shoulder elevation by bracing with hand. b. Maintain right angle at elbow. Objectivity coefficient: 0.9A Figure 8. Shoulder Flexion 5L’Ibid., pp. 16—18. A7 Trunk Flexion.55 Starting Position a. Subject in supine lying position; hips in 180 degrees extension and adduction; knees fully extended; arms folded on chest. Attachments a. Trunk strap around chest, close under arm pits. b. Pulling assembly attached beneath subject through slit in table. Precautions a. Prevent lifting of hips by bracing. Objectivity coefficient: 0.90 Figure 9. Trunk Flexion \ 55Ibid., pp. 23 and 25. Trunk Extension.56 This test is performed in the same manner as trunk Flexion, except subject is in prone position with hands clasped behind back. Objectivity coefficient: 0.99 Figure 10. Trunk Extension Ibid., pp. 23 and 25. A8 A9 r7 3 A . 3 Ahee Exten31on.‘ Starting Position a. Subject in Sitting, backward-leaning position; arms extended to rear, hands grasping sides of table. b. Knee on side tested in 115 degrees extension. Attachments a. Regulation strap around leg midway between knee and ankle joints. b. Pulling assembly attached to hook at lower end of table. Precautions a. Prevent lifting buttocks. b. Prevent flexion of arms. Objectivity coefficient: 0.9A Figure 11. Knee Extension \ C‘ )7Ibid., pp. 28 and 31. CHAPTER IV ANALYSIS OF DATA Description of Subjects and Comparative Data A general description of the subjects is presented in Table IV. Comparative data of the present study and Young's58 study on body composition and Specific gravity are also Shown in Table IV. The mean values in Young's study for body weight (58.96 kg) and fat—free body weight (A2.15 kg) are almost identical to that of the present study; 58.A6 kg and A3.89 kg respectively. The other measures are also similar. Maximal work capacity. Maximal oxygen consumption was determined on 28 young women who ran on the treadmill at 6 mph with a one per cent grade increase each minute until unable to continue. The "run" was preceded by a ten Ininute warm—up "walk" at 3.5 mph on zero grade. Eight Subjects re—ran on the treadmill at maximal capacity to (ietermine the reliability. The metabolic responses 58Charlotte Young, "Body Composition of Young Women," Journal of the American Dietetic Association (April, 1961), 387332-3110. 51 :m.mHImo.HH somm. mm.ma apnea ngopeom m.msHI o.omH mm.m mm.:ma H.H@HI m.o:a oa.m 52.noa whopoeflpcoo ea unmade msaeeoem m.mm I o.mH m.H m.ma m.em I m.aa, Hma.fi em.om menace one names ea oma mm.mmHImm.zw ww.w mm.moa o.mmH I m.mm Hm.m mm.wm pcmfloz pempcmpm mo name How smo.HImmo.H omoo. :mo.a mwm0.H I wamo.a mmoo. wono.a mpfi>mhw owMHooam Umpowpoem N.Hm I m.om :w.m Hm.:m mm.mm I Hw.mH mmw.: mm.wm Amasseom oommnssocpmmv ppm moon mo home mom 0.0m I 0.5m om.m mm.m: HH.H@ I :m.am mwo.m ma.m: mEmeonflx CH pcwflos moon ooLMIpmm o.ae I o.we mm.e we.mm om.os I HH.ee mes.m ea.mm mamamoaas ea cameos aeom owcmm .Q.m :moz owcmm .Q.m cmoz mofipmfihopomhmco mpspm pcomoem absum m.mcsow MDDBm 92mmmmm mmB ZEH3 QmmH mamae 52 to the maximal test and. retest are presented in Table V. The reliability correlations are also Shown in Table V. Mean metabolic responses to maximal Work capacity as compared to the mean results of other studies on women by I. Astrand,59 P. O. Astrand,60 Metheny,61 and Von Dobelnsz’ are presented in Table VI. It is interesting to note the work of others as com- pared to the present study. Maximal work capacity as cor- related with different body composition measures compared similarly with four other studies even though the subjects Ilsed in the other studies were men. Table VII presents nuaximal oxygen consumption as correlated with body composi- txion measures of the present_study and those of Buskirk and CPayflor,63 Von Dobeln,“l Welch,65 and Seltzer.66' 59Astrand, "Aerobic Work Capacity . . ., " loc. cit. 6OIbid. 61Metheny, et al., 100. cit. R 62Von Dobeln, "Human Standard and Maximal Metabolic. ate . . .," loc. cit. 63Buskirk and Taylor, loc. cit. H 1 6“Von Dobeln, "Maximal Oxygen Intake, Body . . ., \Eflc. cit. 65 Welch, et al.,loc. cit. 66Seltzer, loc. cit. > mqm-—b.-~vu IIII. _> H._.~_r_/\.~. .mmmH quImnmmH SCuCoEoHQaCm “mm .Ho> amoH>mCHoCmom QOHmoHOHmmCm wuo< :.mmmz Hpom oohmIpmm on CoHpmHom CH oumm QHHonmpoz HmEmez UCm UCmCCmum Chasm: sCHmHHoQ Cob .3o .man .CoCEo>02IpmswC< .mNMImHmHNMH 6Nw0HonmCm no HCCCCOh CmoHCoE< :nmpzpm o>HmemQSoo < "omHoCoxm msosConm pCm ouwnocoz op Coaoz CCm Co: mo momCoamom OHononHCm oEom: ..Hm_uo .zCoCumz .mo . . .smmH .HHss .HmmeHmue .szHonanm CoHHQQ< mo HmCLCOb :axhoz HmaHNmEnCm wCHCCQ oumm omHzm Bonn AmmoCuHm HMonmcmv mpHomamo OHCOCo< mo COHumHCOHmo Com EMCwOCoz <= awCHSmnm .H CCw CCthwC .0 .mo MI 5 .emmH .HHBB .mmMIHomuem .scHsom HmonoHonaea zamwd USN Nmm Op mocmhmwmm HMHOGQW EHHZ mmmCuHm HMOHmhcm ACME—gm: «Ccmhumdw .0 .mn .oomH «wwIHHume ECHCCEoHQaCm am: .Ho> nmoH>mCHCCQO monOHonmCm muo< :.ow< ou ooCoComwm HmHooam Cqu CoEoz UCm Co: CH huHomamo xCoz OHCOCo<= «UCmCuwa MECHm mo.H mo.H .0 .m HmEmez m.HH m.HH omHCC Cowzxo me HmH mmH me HwH ones canon Hmstmz opCCHE Cog prHoz moon mo EMCwOHHx Cog HEm.mm .oo m.o: .HE :.w: HE :.mz HE m.mm CoHpaECmCoo Cowzxo Hmemez opsCHE Cod mCouHH CH mH.m mo.m ww.m om.m mm.m CoHuQECmCoo Cowzxo HmEmez mpzpm oCHoCom Co> UzConmz oUCmem< ppCmem< MUCmemd mOHpmHCooomCmCo pCommCm .o.m .o.m .H . zmzoz zo mMHQDBm mmmeo OB Ommdmzoo m< NQDBm Bzmmmmm mmB mo meB QCEdez OB mmmzommmm 0Hdom<9mz z mqm on COHHCECmCoo Cowmxo HmEmez mo QHCmCoHumHom: ..Hm no nCOHoz .m .mp .zmmH nCohEoooQICosz .HNHMH ameHpoooopm COHmeoUom =.COHpHmoqeoo zoom mo mpCoCoa IEoo pCm maanH Cowmxo HmEmez Comanom mCHCmCOHHMHom: .COHsz .m pCm xCmesm .mo .mmmH .CoCEopaom ammHImmHumm .MoH>MCHUCmom BOHmoHonmhm mpo< :.sz Hessoz eH canonoEcm Hmcoe one oNHm zoom .oemeeH sewage HeeHxsz=.eHonoo so> .3n .ozmH aMHIHnmmH sawOHOHmNCm mo HmCCCOb CmoHCoE< :.omHoCoxm wCHCCQ UCm pmom pm EmHHOCmpoz Cowzxo pCm UHHCm abom: ACoNHHom .o .o m mm. III III III am. oanos meHoemom mm. III III III III pmm soon mo pCmo Com no. mm. mm. mm. III mEdeOHHx CH prHoz >UOC ooCMIpmm no. mm. mm. III mm. mEmaOHHx CH prHoz mpom modem UCoHoz oCOHzme H CCHoboo Co> mCoNpHom .m> COHCQECmCoo Comzxo HmEmez pComoCm xCHXmCm mmHQDHm mmmeo 29H: nemaazoo ma Hanan Hzmmmma are so onHHmomzoo seem meHz omeaqmmmoo ma CBHoaaao smog gaszaz HH> mqmqa Strength. 56 Eleven cable tension strength measurements were taken in various areas of the body as outlined by Clarke67 in A Manuel: Cable Tension Strength Tests.. The Incans, standard deviations, and ranges found in the present study are presented in Table VIII. Ivomen were found in the literature. TABLE VIII CABLE TENSION STRENGTH IN KILOGRAMS No comparable data on Characteristics Range Mean S.D. Tkrtal strength 383.96 77.00 2A3 - 572 Hi}: flexion 57/1A 1A.55 36.00-9A.32 His: extension AA.O9' 10.35 26.35-65.50 Knee 'extension ‘6A.90 18.83 -39.25-ll7.61 ShIJulder extension 25.31 6.35 13.00—38.38 Ellbow extension 17.08 A.25 9.75-26.88 Ankle extension Al.78 13.29 22.00‘47AL‘A2 Elbow flexion ' 26.3A A.73 1A.75-35.75 ihx>ulder horizontal flexion 16.90 3.92 10.75-2A.65 Ilcnilder flexion 27.6A 7.00 15.25-A3.38 Trunk flexion 3-.03 10.72 1A.13-60.00 rWAnk extension 32.3A 12.10 lA.75-52.88 EEltfigrrelationships of Parameters Pearson Product—Moment correlations. The Pearson Pr'CDduct-Moment Coefficient of Correlation was employed to e'5’*‘b:1.mate the interrelationships of parameters. Table IX prVasents the matrix of intercorrelations of all the variables, \ 67Clarke, Op. cit. « (\I 20 CI.) 17 1A 11 10 LF~ uifiuadig uoysueixg nuns; ugiuaalg uchsIg tenuozydog daptnoug , oizu‘ag C uotxazg M391 I!) U) gv ._,‘ lhuaaig noisusixg hour; uifiuealg uoIsualxg aauy xapuI {adapuog SJaiawIlusw v UI luBIeh Buzpueas swcdhotty u; CBIBM Apog send-leg serBoIIy uI iurzeg Apcg adnnrpuadxz 0710193 JO aBeJany ABC aug leg fipog 30 dues Jag usinuih uI IIprEfiJL aux uo ow:l 1913; IIIWPBGJI aui uo ainugw iscq Buxdnp sing QJLuH quawuteli\ uaflfixc [QUEX'CY'I‘I [Alibi {INCA-‘3 -HESIHWIU “its lJth rainqujI;; iuumu1rzliv unmixg {BUIXDh JO [TI-'IIpILIJ; UO Bulgj, ainu;p/:Jag;1 “1'33 Apog jIIIIuLJJOL; I snug -Ihd n; chlqwnruCp Had/1U 1ELu}XFJL-II 'UIw/vdouIT UI 'IF Apca 3w gunsnci;y u; HUIIWMIUHOK marixL IEL;XLh ‘UII'I‘ JmI .1317: u: u:;qdmruunp uorhxg {EWIXLN {\mc’x: cm I—4(\ ‘1’.) f) H “I 0‘51 3 LIA“: :f r’nm:.m F'.‘ 1‘. 2 3 J 3 2 l —.O LflIch—d‘pr—I—z' (OFImmr—Ir—cr‘._ ('10: {'IrV"IO()I:‘. 'd C‘ruHOf-J . . . . . . . . . . . I I [\NcwI—qur—‘Iaz :3 C13x33 m: .I‘Irf; W3rxr~-I—qm.—q.;~, .J\(".J<"~IOC)r-4Clr—~I C I Q I C O l I I m CI “J f\ 14'1“} {'7‘ I‘M N M ’3‘. (‘J C- {M :1 Cl r“Ir—1 U’WII‘I (“a m .-—I c», Cs CI :7 O . o o . o o n or) I\ In In I1? r~~ 0 cm :3 H—I rv-Im m ::I 3 .I‘- re O‘CNMLW D rn lf‘Iu'.) c0 r—4 (3 ('3 . . . . Ilr-‘I m I—I :51 m N C: I,“ rr—‘o :1 1‘. I: 2 HI «r. 0: pl CI (‘1 m r—I If) :2 O o u . o u n I H -f "T- ’f. _: W ‘1 T'W j r— In r\ .—q I: :I .4 3i 1 t o u c n . I". " I! rl 7| _ ' r]" I _~ 1‘ I" ‘ I ‘ '7 f H‘ I o c . u H I ' L," ‘?I '3 , I“; ' I‘Ivl "| Ir, II ,‘_I . u - r—4 (‘1 C) l‘- "‘I I; ,1 :- ’; u - H V I I:- I ‘1) . r4 ufiozr—‘or—Ixo ’lfikcj‘ifr—iUDZQ ‘-QI)CF‘J2Hr—¢G LIAI-QHF‘WCDNCD . . . . I . . l I -1 CC‘ *‘I'V‘IKDHO .i". I." (1‘) “f t-— “(‘1‘ _ :~~I—m~hr~m 5330 (V‘IPJ O (MIC L."I_."=T ’J‘ LFI-‘JKO ID 0 a O a I I I l C I I I u I r-‘I Mn..lmx£Hmm:I\C-JI—Imo v—I-‘IIQDC‘:.I\.:‘I—II"",cr::r(\r.JQ coo n: NII.~*\:::\C~:oasr-«:I FCHCMNCJQI‘NfJNO O O I I I O I I I l c O O I l H MGJNOIQOQDOMONO I—I_"M:r TIHCDITJC‘PJD :MHM‘”JCI\JHCH\C3 :J‘Mr-ILT [\O‘N'ONNOO I O I l O 0 O l U 0 C o I I I—1 omc.m330.HGr-4I‘Il [\O'LFV‘Ix"I\—€I\CID ““I I—4 (‘3 .—4 a: r—( .“v I‘w. CD ‘I. I3 m H r—1 H‘ 5ch mu? \0 ‘0 I n I I I I O I 0 I o I I H 00: 0:: 031.20 D»f‘t"lr~?.‘J‘Im Weight in Kilograms Type I +———— Means a reciprocal pair ——-+ Means that the variable highest with the one at the head is not highest of variables. at the tail of the arrow is the head, but the one at With the one at the tail. Figure 12. Elementary Linkage Analysis: Type I 61 Maximal Oxygen in Total Time Liters per Minute on Treadmill Maximal Oxygen Maximal Oxygen in Time Maximal per Kilogram of+————— Fat—Free Kilograms+————— Oxygen Body Weight in of Body Weight in Attained Liters per Min. Liters per Minute Type II S Means a rec1procal pair of variables. Means that the variable at the tail of the arrow is highest with the one at the head, but the one at the head is not highest with the one at the tail. Figure 13. Elementary Linkage Analysis: Type II Knee Extension Strength Elbow Flexion——¥——+ Total Strength< Strength Shoulder Extension Strength 62 Shoulder Horizontal Flexion Strength Elbow Extension Strength Shoulder Flexion e Strength Hip Flexion +gStrength I Ankle Extension Strength Trunk Flexion Strength. Type III *‘-— Means a reciprocal pair of variables. N “‘*~—+Means that the variable at the tail of the arrow is highest with the one at the head, but the one at the head is not highest with the one at the tail. Figure 1A. Elementary Linkage Analysis: Type III 63 Heart Rate Simultaneous % . , with Maximal Oxygen gHeaPt Rate~Durinsf Last Minute on Attainment Treadmill Type IV +———— Means a reciprocal pair of variables. Means that the variable at the tail of the arrow is highest with the one at the head, but the one at the head is not highest with the one at the tail. Figure 15. Elementary Linkage Analysis: Type IV Standing Height < Ponderal Index- A r Type V +———— Means a reciprocal pair of variables. “—4- Means that the variable at the tail of the arrow is. highest with the one at the head, but the one at the head is not highest with the one at the tail. Figure 16. Elementary Linkage Analysis: Type V 64 Analysis of Variance One way analysis of variance using unequal subclasses was applied to determine if there were significant differ- ences between the sub—groups. All subjects completed an activity history recall questionnaire in which they recorded their activity for a consecutive five day period. The subjects were listed in rank order according to the average daily energy expended in activity over the five day period. Next subjects were classified into two groups with two cor— responding sub-groups based on rank order energy expenditure. The groups were: Group I: The upper 20 per cent or ”active" subjects as compared to the lower 20 per cent or "less active" subjects determined by a one day average of caloric expenditure, and Group II: The upper 10 per cent or "most active" subjects as compared to the lower 10 per cent or "least active" subjects determined by a one day average of caloric expenditure. Data on daily caloric expenditure is shown in Table X. The subJects were further classified into another group with two» Corresponding sub-groups. The group was: Group III: Physical education majors as compared to non-physical education majors. The null hypothesis states that there are no signifi- cantdifferences between the two groups. Variance ("F" ratio) ‘mas accepted at the .05 level of confidence. TABLE X DAILY CALORIC EXPENTITURE OF GROUP I, GROUP II, AND TOTAL SUBJECTS 65 Groups Mean S.D. Range Group I "Active" upper 20 per cent 2551 335 2201 - 2975 "Less Active" lower 20 per cent 664 A69 371 — 992 Group II "Most Active" upper 10 per cent 2812 1AA 2688 - 2975 "Least Active" lower 10 per cent 535 101 371 - 621 All subjects 1590 687 371 - 2975 * 66 Results of analysis of variance for the upper 20 per cent or "active" subjects as compared to the lower 20 per cent or "less active" subjects. Analysis of variance data of body composition are presented in Tables XI to XV. The significant differences found upon examination of these tables are: l. The "active" subjects were heavier than the "less active" subjects. (Significant at the .01 level of confidence.) 2. The "active'subjects possessed a greater fat— free body weight than the "less active" subjects. (Significant at the .01_level of confidence.) Analysis of variance data of physical activity are presented in Table XVI. The significant differences found upon examination of this table are: l. The "active" subjects expended more energy per day than the "less active" subjects. (Significant at the .01 level of confidence.) 8 Analysis of variance data of maximal work capacity are presented in Tables XVII to XXIII. The significant differ- ences found upon examination of these tables are: l. The "active" subjects possessed a greater maximal oxygen consumption in liters per minute than the "less active" subjects. (Significant at the .05 level of confidence.) 67 Analysis of variance data of strength are presented in Tables XXIV to XXXV. The significant differences found upon examination of these tables are: l. The "active" subjects were stronger in trunk extension strength than the "less active" sub- jects. (Significant at the .01 level of confidence.)' Results of analysis of variance for the upper 10 per cent or "most active" subjects as compared to the lower 10 per cent or "least active" subjects. Analysis of variance data of body composition are presented in Tables XXXVI to XL. The significant differences found upon examination of these tables are: l. The "most active" subjects possessed more body fat than the "least active" subjects. (Signifi- cant at the .01 level of confidence.) The "most active" subjects were heavier than the "least active" subjects. (Significant at the .01 level of confidence.) The "most active" subjects possessed a greater fat-free body weight than the "least active" subjects. (Significant at the .01 level of confidence.) The "most active" subjects had a lower ponderal index than the "least active" subjects. (Significant at the .05 level of confidence.) 68 Analysis of variance data of physical activity are presented in Table XLI. The significant differences found upon examination of this table are: l. The "most active" subjects expended more energy per day than the "least active" subjects. (Significant at the .01 level of confidence.) Analysis of variance data of maximal work capacity are presented in Tables XLII to XLVIII. The significant differences found upon examination of these tables are: l. The "most active" subjects possessed a greater maximal oxygen consumption in liters per minute than the "least active" subjects. (Significant at the .01 level of confidence.) 2. The "most active" subjects possessed a greater maximal oxygen consumption per kilogram of fat— free body weight in liters per minute than the "least active" subjects. (Significant at the .05 level of confidence.) Analysis of variance data of strength are presented in Tables XLIX to LX. The significant differences found upon examination of these tables are: l. The "most active" subjects possessed a greater total strength than the "least active" subjects. (Significant at the .05 level of confidence.) 2. The "most active" subjects were stronger in hip flexion strength, hip extension strength, knee 69 extension strength, elbow extension strength, and shoulder flexion strength than the "least active" subjects. (Significant at the .05 level of con— fidence.) The "most active" subjects were stronger in trunk extension strength than the "least active" subjects. (Significant at the .01 level of confidence.) Results of analysis of variance for the physical educa- tion majors as compared to the noniphysical education majors. Analysis of variance data of body composition are presented in Tables LXI to LXV. The significant differences found upon examination of these tables are: l. The physical education majors possessed a greater fat-free body weight than the non— physical education majors. (Significant at the .05 level of confidence.) Analysis of variance data of physical activity are presented in Table LXVI. The significant differences found upon examination of this table are: l. The physical education majors expended more energy per day than the non—physical education majors. (Significant at the .01 level of con- fidence.) Analysis of variance data of maximal work capacity are presented in Tables LXVII to LXXIII. The significant 70 differences found upon examination of these tables are: l. The physical education majors possessed a greater maximal oxygen consumption in liters per minute than the non-physical education majors. (Significant at the .01 level of confidence.) The physical education majors possessed a greater maximal oxygen consumption per kilogram of fat-free body weight in liters per minute than the non—physical education majors. (Significant at the .05 level of confidence.) Analysis of variance data of strength are presented in tables LXXIV to LXXXV. The significant differences found upon examination of these tables are: l” The physical education majors possessed a greater total strength than the non—physical education majors. (Significant at the .05 level of confidence.) The physical education majors were stronger in hip extension strength than the non-physical education majors. (Significant at the .05 level of confidence.) The physical education majors were stronger in trunk extension strength than the non-physical education majors. (Significant at the .01 level of confidence.) 71 In general then it was found that: l. The "active" subjects (upper 20 per cent), "most active" subjects (upper 10 per cent), and the physical education majors: a. possessed more fat-free body weight, b. were more active, 0. possessed a greater oxygen consumption, and. d. were stronger than the "less active" subjects (lower 20 per cent), "least active" subjects (lower 10 per cent), and the non—physical education majors respectively. 2. The physical education majors were most like the "most active" subjects (upper 10 per cent) except that the "most active" subjects displayed greater strength in more areas of the body as compared to the "least active" subjects (lower 10 per cent) than the physical education majors as compared to the non-physical education majors. The analysis of variance data are presented in Tables XI to LXXXV. .Umpomoom mmznmEmprHHx CH ucwHoz muon :H masopw on» coozpoo WhoocohmmgHU pcmoHMchHm mm: ohms» umcp .mHmozpoozn muMCLmuHm one .Uouoowom mm: mHmmzpoozc HHsc onu «opomohozu “Una mochHmcoo mo Ho>oH Ho. map um ooCMoHHchHm oozocm OHuma m 659 :o.oH n Ho. um m m H mm.: H mo. pm m .0H n no com H u no pom m oHoma Bomb mwom.mH 0H mmmm.mmH mQSOLw chsz mmmw.mm o>Huo< mmoq S. Hamming _ mmmm.mwm H mmmm.mmm masons cmmzpmm momH.mo m>apo< mocmo OHQmm opmdvm Eopoopm mopwdvm mocmem> cam: adopw IHHHcmHm :m: 2mm: mo wmopwmo mo Esm no oohsom H maomu ZH mz mo mHqu¢z< HHx mqmHuo< wmoq .m.z mmmm:.m oooo.mH H oooo.mH mdzohw comzuom mmwo.©m o>Hpo< moswo oHumm ohmsvm Eopooam mopmsvm mocmHLw> cmoz Qsopo :HuchHm :m: cwmz mo mmopwoo mo 83m mo condom H mbomu 2H B m0 mHmMH¢Z< Hx mqm<9 73 .Uouoooom mm: mHmoLQOsz HHsz onu “chomopmsp mpcmoHMchHm on o» pczom p02 was OHQmL m one :o.oH n Ho. pm m m H mm.: H mo. um m .OH u an pew H u no you m oHomB Eopm Hozo.>: 0H me:.omz masons :chH3 mmmo.o©H o>Huo< mmoq .m.z mammm.m mwow.:wH H mmom.:wH masonw coozuom mmmm.me o>Hpo< oocmo oHpmm mmamzdm Eowompm mohmzvm mocwHLm> cwoz ozomo IHchme :m: 2mm: no mooawoo mo Esm mo condom upoQMHU ucmonHcmHm mm: ohms» own» .mHmocpoomn opmcpouHm one H mbomo zH AmmmBmZHBsz zHV Emonm UZHQZ mo mHquHx mqm<8 .Uopoooow mm: .mEmeOHHx :H uanoz zoos mopmlumm :H mosomw on» :ooZuon mooco .pouoowop mm: meocuoomc HHS: map .opomopmsu “pom ooQoUHmcoo go Hm>mH Ho. on» up cosmoHMchHm Umzocm OHpmh m one no.0H u Ho. pm m m H mm.: H mo. um m .OH n no pom H u no how m oHomB anm mew.m OH wwwH.wm mosoaw :Hcsz mmmw.o: o>Huo< mmoq Ho. Hmzzo.om oomn.me H oomm.me mosoaw coozuom mmmm.wz o>Hpo< mocmo oHpmm moamsvm Eopoohm moamsvm mocmHLm> cam: ozone IHchme :m: saw: no mmohwmm mo Esm mo condom H mbomw zH mz mo mHme¢z< HHHx mqmm mmo ocov mLSpHoconm oHLOHMo CH mosopm on» cmmzpoo moocm ILoHMHU osmonHcmHm mm: mpmcp pmnp memogpoomn oumcnopHm one .pmuomhmp mm; mHmmspOan HHdc mcp .opouomogp .Ucm cocooncoo mo Hm>mH Ho. map um cosmonchHm pozocm OHpML m one :o.oH u Ho. pm m mm.: u mo. pm m .0H u was was H u Hos com a meme Sosa mmmm.Hmwow OH ommm.mHmwow chqu mmmo.mmm m>Hpo< mmoq Ho MAmam :MH masosu mmmo.:mOOHm0H H mmwo.:mQOHmOH coozuom ooom.~Hmm o>Huo< mocmo QHumm mopmsvm Eocmomm mmpwzvm oostLm> :moz dsopo IHMchHm :m: 2mm: mo moopwom mo 85m mo condom H mbomw zH Amw¢mm>¢ M mo mHmNHx mqm<8 .Uopaooow mm: mHmocpoomc HHSC osp .oaowopocu mpconMchHm on on ucsom no: mm; OHpmm b one . .JO.OHM Ho. um h mm.: H mo. um m .OH H who pom HHU hog m oHnt Eonm HoHn. 0H :HoH.: mQSOLw :HnuH3 omHm.mH o>Hpo¢ mmoq .m.z mewm. wozm. H wozm. masons somzpmm mHmm.mH m>Huo< mocmo OHumm mohmzvm Eopooam mmamsvm mocmHLw> cmoz _ ozohw IHchme :m: 2mm: mo mmomwom Ho 85m no condom H mbomw 2H NMQZH H mo WHWNH¢Z< >x mqmHpo< mmoq .m.z mmwmw. 0000. H 0000. masonw somzuom wwmo. o>Huo< mocwo oHpmm mohmsvm Eoomopm mmpwzdm mocthw> cwoz . asoau IHHchHm :m: cmmz mo mmoowom mo Esm mo condom H mbomw zH mBDzHS mmm mmmBHH ZH Bmemz Hoom mo E mo mHqux mqm<9 .Uopomoom mm: nopscHE Loo whouHH CH oxmuas cowhxo HmEHNME :H manomw on» cooZuon wmoco upoHMHU unmoHMchHm mm: camp» was» anmocpoomc oumcpouHm one .Uouoowop mm: mHmoQQOan HHzc mcp «whomoposp «pow ooCoUHmcoo mo Ho>oH mo. can no mocmonchHm oozosm OHump m 059 no.0H u Ho. um m om.: u mo. pm m .0H u was cam H u Hme too a mHnme Sosa mme. 0H mmmm.H wQSOLu :chHz ommm.H o>Huo< mmoq mo. mmmm:.m ommm. H ommm. masons :oozuom mwmm.m o>Huo< mocwo OHQmm mommsvm Eoommpm mohwsvm oocmth> ado: . adopo unchHm :m: cmoz mo mompwoa no 83m mo condom H mbomw zH mBDzHE mmm mmMBHH zH mm b0 mHquN mqmHuo¢ mmmq .m.z mmmmo. mmmo. H mmmo. masonw cooZuom oooo.mH m>Hpo< condo 0Humm moLMSUm Eopoohm mopmswm mocmHLm> :moz odopw IHMchHm :m: saw: no moomwoa mo 85m no oopsom H mbomu zH BzmzzH mo mHmWHHpo< mmmq .m.z wmmmH.H @000. H 0000. mucosa escapmm ammo. m>Hpo< oocmo OHpmm mopmsvm Eoomomm mmpmsvm mocmHLm> cam: ozone IHHHQme :m: cmoz mo mmopwoo Ho Edm mo oopsom H mbomo ZH MBDZHE mmm mmmBHH zH BmUHmz Hmom mmmmle mo mHmeHno< mmoq .m.z mmamm. . mmO0.0N ,H mmO0.0~ masonu :ooznom mmmm.mmH m>Hno< mo:mo OHnmm mmnmsvm godmonm mmnwsvm mo:MH:w> :mmz macaw IHMH:me :m: :moz no mmmpwmm no Esm no condom H mbomo zH HHH2Q mo mHmMHHno< mmoq .m.z ONNOO. mmmm.w H mmmm.w manomu :ooznom ooom.mOH m>Hno¢ mo:mo OHnmm mmpmzvm Eowmonm mopmsvm mo:mHnm> :moz ozonw IHMH:me :m: :moz no moomwmm no Ezm mo condom H mbomw zH BzmSzH¢BE¢ MM mo mHmHH¢Z¢ Hxx mqm¢B 78 .Uonooooo mo: mHmoLnoqm: HHs: o:n nonomohozn mn:oonH:mHm on on p:som no: mo; OHno: m one no.0H u Ho. n: m mm.: u mO. no m .OH H mm: o:o n Hno mom m oHnt Eon: OOOH.mmwN OH womm.Hmmmm masonw :chHz mmmw.Hmm o>Hno< mmoq .m.z mmwmm.H OOO0.0000H H OOO0.0000H mosopw :ooznom mmmw.HH: o>Hno¢ oo:oo oHnmm moLMSUm Eoooopm mopmsvw oo:mH:o> :moz Qsomo IHMH:mHm zm: :ooz no moopwoo no saw no oonsom H mbomo zH.mbzmmBm H¢BOB mo moz mo mHmHHHxx mqmHno¢ mmoq .m.z mmwOO. OONO. H OONO. masons :oo3nom mmOO.mH o>Hno< oo:oo oHnmm monoSOm Eoooonm monozvm oo:oH:o> :moz macaw lHMH:me =m: :ooz mo moomwoa mo 83w mo oonsom H mDOmU ZH AWMBDZHE ZHV MEHB HHHEQ mo mHmNHHno¢ moon .m.z ememm.H mmmz.mmH H Oom:.mmH masopw :ooznom mMHm.w: o>Hno< oo:oo OHnmm moamsvm Eoooonm monmzvm oo:oH:m> :moz ozonw uHmH:me :m: :moz no moommoo mo 83m no oopsom H mbomw zH mewzmmem ZOHmzmexm mHm mo woz¢Hm¢> mo mHmeH¢z< H>xx mqmHno< wmoq .m.z OOOOO. emee.mmm H emee.mmm mdsopu :oo3nom ommm.mw o>Hno¢ oo:oo OHnom wonmsvm Eoooonm monmsvm oo:wH:o> :ooz osopo IHHH:me zm: :moz mo moopwoo no Edm no oopsom H mbomw zH mewzmmem ZOHHMHm mHm mo moz.mO WHWMHxx mqmHno¢ mmoq .m.z OOONO. . emmm.: H ewmm.z masonc :ooznom me:.mm o>Hno< oo:wo OHnom monosvm Eoooohm mohozvm oo:lom> :ooz adomw IHmH:me :=m= :ooz no moonwoo Ho 55m no oohsom H mbomo 2H zeuzmmem ZOHmzmexm mmoqbomm mo moz mo.mHmeH¢z¢ HHH>HH mqmae .Oondooom mm; mHmosnoam: HHs: ocn .opomohocn mn:oonH:me on on c::om no: mo: OHnoh m one :0.0H Ho. n.m m .mm.: H mo. nw m .OH H NHU 6:: u HHU,LOHm oHnme Eonm oomm.me OH moom.meHm mQSOLU :chHB mmom.:m o>Hno¢lmon .m.z .NNHHH.: , mmmm.momH H mmmm.OOMH «Quote somzuom mmu~.mu m>Hnoa oo:mo OHnmm monosvm Eoooonm monmsvm oo:mHHm> :mo: Q5090 IHMH:me zmz :ooz mo moonmoo no 83m mo oonsom . H mbomu zH mewzmmem ZOHmzmeNm MMZM mo moz mo mHmMHNx mqm¢e 81 .Uonqooom mm: mHmonnoomn HHs: o:n no:ono:o:n mn:ooHMH:me on on 6::om no: mo: OHnm: m oce :0.0H n HO. no m om.: u mo. as m .OH ".mne cam H u Hoe won a meme Eon: OOHw.mmm OH mOOH.mmmm masons :chHz mmmm.m: o>Hno< moon .m.z mmOHO. emem.m H emem.m mQSOLO :ooznom mwmw.H= o>Hno¢ oo:oo OHnom monmswm Eopoomm mono5dm oo:oH:m> :ooz QSOLO IHMH:me :m: :woz no moopwoo no Sam no oondom H mbomo 2H mewzmmem ZOmeHm Bomqm mo moz mo mmeHHno< moon .m.z mHemz. mmw0.0H H mmw0.0H masonu :ooznom ,Ommm.wH o>Hno< oo:oo oHnmm moposvm Eoooopm monosom oo:onm> :moz adopo IHHH:me :m: :ooz no moonwoa no saw no oopsom H mbomu zH memzmmem ZOHmzmexm 3omqm mo mDZ¢Hm¢> mo mHmMH¢Z< xHxx mqm¢e 82 .6onoooom mo: mHmocnooH: HHz: o:n .opomoponn mn:ooHMH:me on on 6:zoo no: mo: oHnmn m oce :0.0H u HO. no o .m H em.: u mO. no o .OH H M6 6:Hw H u m6 pom o oHnoe Eomo mewm.mm OH mmew.mmm mozope :HnnHz ommw.eH o>Hno¢ mmoH .m.z OoezH. . oeem.m H Oeem.m monLe :ooznom OOww.eH o>Hno¢ oo:oo OHnmm mopmzem E06ooLo mopozem oo:oHpo> :ooz ozone IHoH:me =o: :ooz mo moopwoo mo Ezm mo oomzom H obome zH meezmmem ZOmeqm H mo mHmeH¢z< HHxxx mqmoe .6onooooo mo: mHmonnooxc HHz: o:n aohomopocn mn:oonH:me on on 6:zom no: mo: OHnmL m one :0.0H u HO. no m em.: n mO. no o .OH H NH6 6:: H u Ho6 mom o oHome Eopo HeHm.mH OH ew:m.:m mozone :HanH3 mwmm.m: o>Hno¢ moon .m.z OOHON.H , . . mmeH.Hm H :mem.m:m monLe :ooznom Ommm.em o>Hno< oo:oo OHnom monmzem EO6oono momozem oo:oH:o> :ooz. ozone IHmH:me zoz :moz mo moonwoo no Szm mo oopzom. H obome zH meezmmem onmzmexm quz< mo moz mo mHmMHHpo< mmmH .m.z mzmzH. mwmm.w H mwmm.w moSOQU :oo3nom mmmo.:m o>Hno< oo:mo OHnom monozem EO6oo:o monmzem .oo:oHpm> :ooz ozone uHoH:me zo: :ooz mo moopwoo mo Ezm no oopzom H obome zH meezmmem ZOmeqm MZDme mo moz mo mHmMH¢z< >Hxxx mqmee .6onoooom mm: mHmosnooxc HHz: o:n aomomopocn mn:m0HmH:mHm on on 6:zoo no: mo: OHno: m o:e no.0H u.Ho. pm a m H .Om.z u mo. pm a .OH u me was H u no co: m mHnma scam mem.mH OH mHmm.mmH masone :Hnqu ,oHMH.mm m>Huo< mmmH .m.z mmmmm. omnm.mm H omoe.mm masons cmmzsmm emhm.wm .m>Hpo« oo:mo OHnmm mopozem EO6oo:o monmzdw oo:oHLo> :ooz ozone IHHH:me =m= :ooz no moomwoo mo Ezm mo oonzom H obome 2H meezmmem onxmum meHDOmm m0 moz¢Hm¢> mo mHmMHoH HO. osn no oo:MoHnH:me 6ozo:m OHnmn o o:e ON.Hm u HO. no m He.~ n mO._no o .a u mn6 6:6 H u.Hn6 non o oHooe.EOnm . meom.H : mmmw.: mozone :HnnHB mmmw.Hm o>Hno< nmooH HO. O::MO.Hm . ooom.em H ,Ooom.em mozone :ooznom mmme.em o>Hno¢ nmoz oo:oo OHnmm monmzem EO6oono monmzem oo:oHno> :ooz ozone anH:me zo: :ooz no moonwoo no Ezm no oonzom HH obome zH eom woom ezmo mmo mo moz mo mHmeHxxx mqmoe .6onooooo mo: .cnw:onnm :onconxo x:znn :H,mozonw o:n :ooznon moo:o InonnH6 n:ooHnH:me mo: onocn no:n mmHmonnoom: ono:nonHo one .6onoonon mos meonnoox: HHz: o:n .ononononn n65m oo:o6Hn:oo no Ho>oH HO. onn no oo:ooHnH:me 6o30:m oHnmn o o:e . . 30.0H u HO. no o m H mm.: H mO. n.mw m .OH H H6 6:6 H u M6 now m oHnme Eonm mmHm.mm OH mwwH.mmm mozone :HQnH3 mwm:.HN o>Hno¢ mmod HO. Ozeee.em Heam.:m:H H Hezm.:m:H mozone :ooznom mwwh.m: o>Hno< oo:oo OHnmm monmzem EO6oono monozdm oo:oHno> :moz ozone IHnH:me :o: :moz mo moonwoo no Ezm no oonzom H obome zH meezmmem ZOHmzmexm xZDme mo moz mo mHmMHxxx mqm6oo oonnlnon :H mozonw ozn :ooznon moo:o mmomo:noom: onm:nonHo one HHz: o:n .onononocn a6:.o oo:o6Hn:oo no Ho>oH HO. .6onoonon mm3.mHmo:nooz: o:n no oo:ooHnH:me 6ozonm oHnmn m oce ON.HN n HO. no o N H He.» u mO. no m .2 u n6 6:o H u. n6 non m oHooe Eonn meee.m z. mee0.0H manna cHnnHz OOOO.mm m>Hno< ummmo HO. OOOO0.0: eeee.omH H OOO0.0MH mozone :ooznom OOO0.0: o>Hno< nmoz oo:@o OHnmm monozem EO6oono monozdm oo:oHno> :moz ozone InH:me =n: :ooz no moonwoo no.Ezm no oonzom HH mDOme zH mzomeOHHx zH emeHmB emom mmmmie mo mHmeH¢z< HHH>xxx mqm¢e .6onoooom mm: .mEmnwOHHx :H ncwHoz >609 :H mozonw ocn :ooznon moo:o inonnH6 n:m0HnH:mHm mm: ononn nmcn memocnoom: onm:nonHo one HHz: o:n .ononono:n n6:m oo:o6Hn:oo no Ho>oH HO. .6onoomon mw3 mHmoznoonc onn no oo:ooHnH:me 6ozonm.0Hnmn o one ON.HN n HO. nHw o N H He.» u mO. no o .3 u n6 6:o H n n6 non o oHnoe Bonn eeeH.e : OOOH.:N mozone :HnnHz OOO0.0m o>Hno<.nmmoq Ho. mOHmO.HO OOOH.OO2 H OOOH.OO2 mozone :ooznom OOOe.ee o>Hno< nmoz oo:mo OHnmm monozem 806oono monmzdm oocoHnm> :moz ozone IHnH:me zmz :ooz no moonwoo .no Ezm no oonzom HH obome zH mz mo.mHmeHxxx mqm¢e 6 . no _ .6onoooom mos axo6:H Hono6:oo :H mozonw onn :ooznoo moo:o InonnHe n:moHnH:me mo: onozn nmnn mmHmonnoom: ono:nonHm oze .6onoonon mo3 mHmocnoom: HHz: o:n .onononocn .6:o oo:o6Hn:oo no Ho>oH mo. o:n no oo:ooHnH:me 6ozo:m oHnmn m o:e ON.HN u HO. no m Hn.n u mo. oo o .H u mno ooo H u Hno non n oHoon Soon :NOH. . a moon. mozone :chH3 eem:.MH o>Hno< nmmoq mO. OONOm.MH ONmm.H H ONmm.H mozone :ooznom mmm:.NH o>Hno< nmoz oo:oo oHnmm onmzem EO6oono monmzem oo:anm> :moz ozone IHnH:me =o= :moz no moonwoo no Ezm no oonzom HH mDOme.ZH xmozH H mo mHmeHHno< nmwoq .m.z Oomem.H omH:.:H H omHz.:H mozone :oo3nom eeee.eeH o>Hno¢ nmoz oo:oo oHnom onmzem EO6oonn monozem oooonnm> :ooE ozone IHnH:mHm :o: :moz no moonwoo no Ezm no oonzom HH obome zH HemmemzHezme ZHV emeHmm ezHQz mo mHmMHoH HO. o:n no oo:o0HnH:wHw 6ozonm OHnmn m o:e ON.HN u HO. no n N H ._ He.e u mO. no n .z n n6 6:w H n n6 non n oHooe Eono memo. : .eeOH. mozone :HnnHz O:O~.H o>Hno< nmooq HO. m:n:m.mm mmmO.H H mmmm.H mozone :ooznom ONOO.N o>Hno¢ nmoz oo:mo OHnwm onozem oEO6oonn monmzem oo:oHno> :moz ozone IHnH:me zm: :moz no moonwoo no Ezm no oonzom ,HH oeome 2H meszz mun mmmeHH 2H mx mo mHmeHo no6 o:ov onan6:ooxo OHnOHoo :H mozonw onn :ooznon moo:o InonnH6.n:m0HnH:me mos ono:n nm:n mmHmocnoom: ono:nonHm o:e .6onoonon no: mHmonnoon: HHz: ocn «ononononn .6:m oo:o6Hn:oo no Ho>oH HO. o:n no oo:ooHnH:me 6ozocm OHnon n one ON.HN u HO. no n N H He.~ u mO. no n .a u n6 6:o H u n6 non n oHnoe Bonn mmmm.OHOHN : VNmmm.e~O:O mozone :H:nH3 mmmm.mmm o>Hno¢ nmmoH HO. mmown.mem , OOOH.O:mNeNe H OOOH.O=mNeee mozone :ooznom eeee.HHON o>Hno< nmoz oo:oo OHnom onmzem n806oonn monozem oo:mHnm> :ooz ozone tHnH:me =n= :ooz no moonwoo no Ezm no oonzom HH obome zH Amedmm>< M mo WHWMH¢Z¢ HHx mqm609 oonnunmn no EmnonHx noo oxonoz :ownxo HoEmeE :H mozonw o:n :oo3noo moo:o MW [nonnHe n:m0HnH:me mm: ono:n noon mmHmonnooH: onocnonHw one .6onoonon mm; mHmoznoom: HHz: ocn .ononononnn6:o o0:o6Hn:oo n0 Ho>oH mO. o:n no o0:m0HnH:me 6ozocw 0Hnmn o one ON.HN u HO. no m Hn.n u mO. oo o .H u mno oco H u Hno non n oHoon goon OOOO. : HOOO. mozone :Hanz omzo. o>Hno< nmooq mO. emHON.HH mOOO. H mOOO. mozone :ooznom Homo. o>Hno¢ nmoz oo:Mo 0Hnmm onmzem :EO6oonn monozem oo:oHno> :ooz ozone IHnH:me znz :moz no moonmoo no Ezm no oonzom HH obome ZH meDzHS mmm mmmeHH zH emeHmz Hoom mmmml enm mo Z mo mHmeHqu mHmHno< nmooq .m.z OONOO.m . OOOO. H OOOO. mozone :ooznom HNHO. o>Hno< nmoz o0:M0 0Hnwm onmzem .EO6oonn monmzem oo:mHnm> :ooz ozone IHnH:me :n: :moz no moonwoo no Ezm no oonzom HH obome ZH mmeDsz mmo mmmeHH zH emeHmz emom.mo zomeOHHx mmo mx mo mHmeH¢z< HHHHx mqmne 89 J6onooooo mo: mHmonnooos HHz: o:n .onononocn.mn:moHnH:mHm on on 6:z0n no: mo: 0Hnmn n oze ON.HN u HO. nM n 4 H5.» u mO. no n .z u Nn6 6:o H u rn6 non o oHome Eono OOOH.:OH : eeee.eme mozone :H:nH3 mmmm.mmH o>Hno< nmmoH .m.z amazo. OOOH.O H OOOH.O mozone :ooznom OOOO.HOH o>Hno¢ nmoz o0:M0 oHnmm onozem 806oonn monozem oo:oHnm> :ooz ozone IHnH:me zn: :moz no moonwoo no Ezm no oonzom HH obome zH ezmzzH mo mHmeHHx mqmHno< nmooq .m.z memme. - eeee.N H eeee.N mozone :ooznom eeee.mH o>Hn0< nmoz o0:do 0Hnom onmzem a806oono monmzem o0:mHno> _:mo2 ozone anH:mHm zoo :ooz n0 moonmoo no Ezm n0 oonzom HH obome zH ezm22H mo mmeH¢z< >Hx mqmHooa omoz oo:mo oHnmm onozem :E06oonn monozem oo:oHno> :ooz ozone IHnH:me zm: :ooz no moonwoo n0 Ezm no oonzom HH obome zH Ammeszz zHV mzHe HHHzodmme H no mHmeHHx mqmHno< nmooq .m.z nmmnm. . OOOO.N2 H OOOO.N2 mozone :ooznom mmmm.NmH o>Hn0¢ nmoz oo:m0 0Hnom onmzem 806oonn monozem o0:MHnm> :ooz ozone IHnH:me =n: :ooz no moonwoo no Ezm no oonzom HH mme zo meDzHS emdq mme mo obome 2H HHHEQ mo mHmeH¢z< HH>Hx mHm¢e 91 .6onooooo mm: .nnwnonnm.:onoHn oHn :H mozonw.onn.:oo3non.moo:o InonnH6 n:moHnH:me.mo3 ononn nmnn mmHmonnoonn ononnonHo one .6onoomonmm3.mHmonnoonn HHz: onn «ononononn .6nm oo:o6Hn:0o n0 Ho>oH mO..onn no oo:MOHnH:me 6o30nm 0Hnwn n one ON.HN u HO. no n . N - _ . H . . Hn.n u mO. no n , .2 u no.ooo H u no non n oHoon-sonm m2ON.HmN 2 meeH.mNm mozone :HnnHz mm2m.N2 o>Hno< nmooH mO. m2H2e.e . . . nmmm.OONH H nmmm.OONH mozone :ooznom .mmm2.nn o>Hno< noo: oocoo 0Hndmi.. onozvm 506oonn monozdm oo:mHnm> noo: ozone anH:me . :n: :moz no moonwoo no Ezm ‘ no oonzom A HH obome zH meezmmem ZOHxMHm on mo moanm¢> m0 mHmMHoH mO. onn no oo:ooHnH:me 6o30nm oHnmn n one ON.HN n HO. no n .N H .HN.» u mO. no n .2 u n6 6:m H.u. n6 non n oHnwe eonn OOOO.NOOH H OOOO.OOHOH mosono :Hoonz OOOO.HHm o>Hoo< noooH mO. mNeNm.OH . OOOO.eNmN2 H OOOO.eNme2 wozone :ooznom OOO0.002 . o>Hno< noo: oonmo 0Hnmm onmzvm eo6oonn monmzem - oonoHnm> . :moz . ozone anszHm =n= :moz n0 moonwoo no ezw n0 oonzOm HH obome zH meezmmem H mO_mHWMHoH_HO. onn no oo:MoHnH:me 6o30nm 0Hnmn n one ON.HN u HO. no n N H Hn.m u mo. no n .2 u n6 6nd H u n6 non n oHnoe Bonn emww.mmH 2 2mmm.mNe mozone :HnnH3 eeem.22 o>Hno< nmmon mO. NNNmm.mH OeOO.MHom H meme.mHom mozone :ooznom . OOON.OO o>Hno< noo: o0:@0 0Hnwm onmzem “B06oonn monozem oo:MHnm> :moz ozone IHnH:me =n= noo: no moonwoo no Bzm no oonzom HH nDome zH meezmmem ZOHmzmexm mmzx no moanm<> no mHmeqnzn HHH mHmne .6onooooo mo: .nnwnonnm :0Hmnonxo oHn :H wozonw onn :ooanon mo0:ono InonnH6 nnmoHanme mo: ononn nonn mmeonnoonn ononnonHo one .6onoofion mo: mHmonnoonn HHz: onn .ononononn .6nm oono6Hn:oo no Ho>oH mo. onn no oo:ooHnH:me 6ozonm 0Hnon n one ON.HN n HO. no n N H , Hn.n u me. no n .2 u n6 6nd H u n6 non n oHnwe Bonn 2200.mm 2 mumm.O2H mozne :HnnHz MM20.nm .o>Hno< nmoon. mO. FNomH.O . . . He2N.mON H HO2N.mON mozone :ooznom mmmw.om o>Hno< noo: o0:oo 0Hnmm onozem uB06oonn monozem o0:MHno> :ooz ozone InH:me zn: noo: no.moonmoo no Bzm .no oonzom HH noome 2H,meezmmem onmzmexm Afifln no moz no mHmeann HH mqmoH mo. .6onoonon mo: mHmonnoonn onn no o0:onnH:me 6o30nm oHnmn n one ON.HN n HO. no n N . H He.» u mo. no n .2 u n6 6:m H u n6 non n oHnme Bonn mNem.m 2 OomN.NN mozone :HnnHz .Oome.2H o>Hno< nmoon mO. eNmmm.HH . omem.me H omem.me mozone :ooznom OOmN.HN o>Hno< nmoz oonoo 0Hnon onmzem B06oonn monozem ooannm> noo: ozone IHanme =n: :moz no moonwoo no Bzm n0 oonzom HH noone zH meezmnem ZOHmzmexm zomHm no Moz¢Hm¢> no mHmeqnzn >HH mnmne .6onoooom mm; mHmonnoonn HHz: onn .ononononn mn:MoHnH:me on on 6:zon no: mo: 0Hnon n one ON.HN u HO. no n. N H Hm.n u mO. no n. .2 u n6 6:o H u n6 non n oHnme Bonn OO2m.2m . 2 eNem.emN mozone :HnnH3 OOM@.2N o>Hn0¢ nmmon .m.z eM2eO. NHOO.H> H NHme.Hn mozone :ooznom MM2m.Hm o>Hno< nmoz oo:M0 0Hnmn onmzem qBoooonn monmzem oonoHno> :ooz ozone IHnH:me =n= :moz no moonmoo no Bzm n0 oonzom HH nDome 2H meezmnem onmzmexm nmodoomm no moz no mHmeH¢z< HHHH mqmHno¢ nmoon .m.z Omnmmn . . , eH20.NHH H OH20.NHH mozone :ooznom eeHm.mN o>Hno< noo: oo:mo 0Hnom onozem B06oonn monmzem oo:oHnm> noo: ozone IHanme =n= :moz no moonwoo no Bzm no oonzom HH noone zH meezmnem onmzmexm quz< no moz.no,mmeH¢z< H>H mqmne .6onooooo mo: mHmonnoonn HHz: onn .ononononn mnnooHanme on on 6:zon no: mo: 0Hnmn n one . u . m ON HN HO n n N H Hn.n u mO. no n .2 u n6 6no H u n6 non n oHnoe Bonn O2NH.O2N 2 Neme.emm mozone :HnnHz ooe2.M2 o>Hno¢ nmoon .m.z ommem. , . OOOM.O2H H OOOm.O2H mozone :ooznom MMMH.mm o>Hno¢ noo: oo:¢o 0Hnmm onozem .B06oonn monozdm oo:mHno> noo: ozone anHanm =n= noo: no moonwoo no Bzm no oonzom .HH noomo 2H meezmnem onmen BomHm no moann¢> no mHmMHH mqmne 95 InonnH6 nnoOHnH:me mos ononn nonn mmHmonnoonn ononnonHo one HHz: onn nononononn .6:o oo:o6Hnnoo no Ho>oH mO. .6onoo00o mo: annw:onnm :OonHn no6Hzonm :H mozonw onn :ooznon woo:o .6onoowon mos mHmonnoonn onn no oonooHanmHm 6o30nm 0Hnon n one ON.HN u HO. no n N H . Hn.n u mO. no n .2 u n6 6:o H u n6 non n oHnoe Bonn mm22.mm 2 mnme.MMH mozone :HnnHz eeem.NN o>Hn0¢ nmoon mO. mmOO2.O , MNHH.NHm H MNHH.NHm mozone :ooZnom eeNH.nm o>Hno< nmoz oonoo 0Hnom onozem B06oonn monozem oo:oHno> noo: ozone IHanmHm =n= :ooz n0 moonwoo no Bzm no oonzom HH noone.zH meezmmem ZOHxMHn mmoqoomm no moann<> no mmeann HHH>H mnmne .6onooooo mo: mHmonnoonn HHz: onn nononononn .nnooHanme on on 6:z0n no: mo: 0Hnon n one ON.HN u HO. no n N H Hn.n n mO. no n .2 u n6 6:o H u n6 non n oHnoe Bonn meHH.mH 2 Nee2.0e mozone :HnnHz mmmn.mH o>Hno< nmoon .m.z mwmme.N ONOO.N2 H ONOO.N2 mozone :oo3nom oomO.HN o>Hno¢ nmoz oonoo 0Hnom onozem 1B06oonn monozem oonoHno> :ooz ozone anH:me =n= :ooz no moonmoo no Bzm no oonzom. HH noome 2H meezmmem onxmnn HnezoNHmon mmoneomm no meannn> no mHmnnnzn HH>H mqmde 96 .6onooooo mo: .nnwnonnw :0Hmnonxo xnznn SH mozonw onn :ooznon moo:o nnonnH6 nnoOHanme mo: ononn nonn MmHmonnoonn ononnonHo one .6onoomon mo: mHmonnoonn HHz: onn ononononn .6no oonoeHn:oo no Ho>oH HO. onn no oonooHnH:me.6o30nm 0Hnon n one ON.HN u HO. no n . Hn.n u me. no n .2 u Nn6 6:o H u Hn6 non n oHnoe Bonn mmem.wm 2 emnw.mmH mozone :HnnH3 OOmn.mH o>Hno< nmoon HO. ONOeO.mN mmeN.NOOH H mOON.NOOH mozone :ooznom eoem.m2 o>Hno< noo: oonoo 0Hnom .onozem “B06oonn monozem oonoHno> :ooz ozone IanmHm :n: :ooz . no moonmoo no Bzm no oonzom HH noone 2H meezmmem ZOHmzmexm xzone no moz no mHmNHHno< nmoon .m.z nnwmm. OOOe.mm H wome.mm mozone nooznom memm.om o>Hnon nmoz oonoo 0Hnom onozem 2B06oonn monozem oonoHno> :ooz- ozone yHanme :n: :ooz no moonmoo no Bzm no oonzow HH noone zH meezmmem ZOmenn xzome no moanm<> no mHmMH. noo: ozone anHanm =n= noo: no moonwoo n0 Bzm no oonzom HHH nbome zH mz no mHmeH¢z< HHxH mqm :ooz ozone anHanm =n= noo: n0 moonwoo no Bzm no oonzom HHH noone 2H e no meNH :ooz ozone IHanme :n: noo: n0 moonwoo no Bzm no oonzom HHH noome zH AmnmemzHezmo sz emeHmm ezHoznem no moz no mHmMHHxH mnmne .6onooooo mo: nmBonmoHHn :H.nano3 n6on.oonn|nonV:H.moz0nw onnrnooZnon.moono unonnH6 nnoOHnH:me mo: ononn nonn mmeonnoonn ononnonHo one .6onoonon mo: mHmonnoonn HHz: onn nononononn a6:o oono6Hnnoo no Ho>oH mo. onn no oonooHanmHm 6o30nm 0Hnon n one Nn.m u HO. no n N H NN.2 u mO. no n .eN u n6 6:o H u n6 non n oHnoe Bonn mmmn.NH em Hmme.Nmm mozone :HnnH3 HOHO.H2 mnomoBlnoz mO. nm2mO.e mmmm.nn H mmOO.nn mononO ooozoom mmmm.m2 onoHoz oonoo 0Hnom onozem .B06oonn monozem oonoHno> :ooz ozone IHanme :n: :ooz n0 moonmoo no Bzm no oonzom HHH noome zH mznneOHHx zH emeHmz Moom mmnnlenn no moann¢> no mHmeqnzn HHHxH mqmne 99 .6onooooo won aAowono>o no6 onov onan6nooxo oHn0Hoo :H mozonw onn :ooznon woono InonnH6 n:ooHnH:me mo: ononn nonn umHmonnoonn ononnonHo one .6onoomon mo: mHmonnoonn HHz: onn nononononn .6:o oono6Hn:oo no Ho>oH HO. onn no oonooHanme 6ozonm 0Hnon n one N5.» n HO. no n N H NN.2 mO. no n .eN u n6 6:o H u n6 non n oHnoe Bonn HmOO.mmOmmm ON ownm.NN20©em mozone :HnnH3 wHwH.mHHH wnoOoEIcoz HO. 2mmmN.NH OONm.MOmHOOH H ommm.mOmHOOH mooono oooznom HHHO.OOOH onoOoz oonoo oHnon onozem .B06oonn monozom oonoHno> noo: ozone IHnH:me =n: :ooz n0 moonmoo no Bzm no oonzom HHH noone ZH Amenmm>< eno mzov mnDeHozmnxm OHmoqno no moann<> no mHmeHxH mnm :ooz ozone IHanmHm =n: :ooz n0 moonwoo n0 Bzm no oonzom _HHH noone zH xmozH H no mHmMHxH nqmne lOO .6onooooo mo; mHmonnoonn HHz: onn .ononononn mnnooHanme on on 6:zon.n0: mo: 0Hnon n one Nn.u u HO. no n NN.2 n mO. no n .om u mno coo u Hno non n oHoon soon OOOO. ON mOOO. monono ononn; mmMO. onoOoEIBoz .m.z HOOmm.m OOOO. H OOOO. mooonO ooozoom OHMO. onoOoz oonoo oHnon onozom oB06oonn monozem oo:oHno> :ooz ozone :HnH:mHm :n: :ooz no moonwoo no Bzm no oonzom HHH noome ZH meozHE nmn mnneHH zH emeHmz woom no z no mHWNan< HHH>xH nnmne .6onooooo mo: «onanB noo mnonHH :H ononoz :ownxo HoBonB :H wozonw onn :oo3non moono unonnH6 nnooHanmHm mo: ononn nonn MmHmonnoonn ononnonHo one .6on0ohon mo: mHmonnoonn HHz: onn .ononononn .eno oono6Hnnoo no Ho>oH HO. onn no oonooHnH:me 6ozonm oHnon n one mn.n u HO. no n mm.: u mO. oo o .Om u mno ooo H u Hno non n oHoon soon eNmO. eN eOO2.N mozne :HnnHz 20mm.H mnOOoBlnoz HO. Hmnmm.NH ~22H.H H >22H.H wozone :oo3nom 2mmm.N mnOOoz oonoo oHnom onozem .B06oonn monozem oonoHno> :ooz ozone IHanme :n= :ooz no moonmoo n0 Bzm no oonzom HHH noome 2H meDzHS nmn mnmeHH 2H mxnenb zmewxo H<2Hx<2 no moanm<> no mHmexH mqmne lOl .6onooooo mo; mHmonnoonn HHz: onn .ononononn mnnooHanme on on 6:z0n no: mo: oHnon n one Nn.n u HO. no n N H NN.2 u mO. no n .Om u no ooo u no non n oHoon Sonn Hwnm.m om oOHm.Om monono onoan mnmn.2H onoHoSusoz .m.z HHHOO. mOOO. H mOOO. monono cooznom n2o~.2H onoHo: oo:o0 0Hnon onozem ”B06oonn monozem oonoHno> noo: ozone IHnH:me :n: :ooz no moonwoo n0 Bzm no oonzom HHH noome ZH ezm22H no mHqunzn xxH mqmoH HO. onn no oonoOHnH:me 6o30nm 0Hnon n one No.5 u HO. no n N H NN.2 u mO. no n .eN u n6 6:o H u n6 non n oHnoe Bonn OOOO. eN OOOO. mozone :HnnHB ee20. mnonoBu:oz mo. H20mm.m HOOO. H HOOO. monono soozoom OHmO. onoHoz oo:o0 oHnon onozem LB06oonn monozem oonoHno> :ooz ozone IHanme :n: :ooz no moonwoo n0 Bzm n0 oonzom (ll HHH noone zH meDsz nmn mmmeHH zH emeHmz noon mmnnuedn no SnneOHHx nmn mx no mHmeqnzn xHxH mqmde 102 .6onooooo mo: mHmonnoonn HHz: onn .ononononn mnnoOHanme on on 6:z0n no: mo: 0Hnon n one mn.n u HO. no n m H mm.: H mO. no n .Om n no oco H u no oon n oHoon Soon oHnn.HO om H2@O.HOOH mooooo oHonHz nonm.HmH mooOoS-ooz .m.z mmOHn.H wmmH.HHH H mmmH.HHH mooooo Soonnon Ommm.mOH mooHos oonoo 0Hnon onozem -B06oonn monozem oo:oHno> :ooz ozone IHnficwHw :n: Goo: no moonwoo no 83m no mondom HHH nbome no HHHzonmne mme zo mebZHz emnq mme no neon ennm: mme no moz no mHmnnnzn HHxxH mnmne .6onooooo moz mHmonnoonn HHz: onn aononononn mnnooHanme on on 6:z0n no: moz 0Hnon n one mn.n u HO. no n m H NN.2 u mO. no n .Om u no ooo H u no oon n oHoon Soon OOOH.OO om wnOH.HOmm mooooo cHnoon 2m:m.nOH mooOoSuooz .m.z anOH. nOmm.o: H nOmm.O2 mooooO Soonnom HonH.OOH moonon oonoo oHnon onozem _B06oonn monozom oonoHno> noo: ozone anHanm :n: :ooz no moonmoo no Bzm n0 oonzom HHH noome zH ezmzaneen mxneno zmewxo anHxnz one meHz mbomz no mennnzn HxxH mqmne 103 .oonooooo mm: .:nw:onnm Honon :H masonw o:n :ooznoo moo:o Inonnoo n:moonfi:mfim,mm3 onocn nm:n ”mamo:nomz: onm:honao one .oonoomou mm; mfimo:noqn: HHz: o:n .ononopocn .o:m mo:oofin:oo no Ho>oa mo. ocn no oo:doHnH:wfim oozonm oonmn n o:e me.n u Ho. no n mm.: u mo. no n .om.u Nno ooo H u Hno non n oHoon sonn . . nnom.=omm om OHo:.momomH masono oHonHz meH.mHm oncooEIooz mo ooooz : mmom.anmm H mmom.anmm masono soozoom oNHH.no: onoooz oo:do nonnom ohmsvm Eoooonn moLMSUm oo:monm> :moz ozonc IHnH:me =n: :ooz no moonmoo no Ezm no oopsom HHH nbomo zH meozmmem Q¢eoe no MOZ¢Hn<> no mHmeqHqu mqm¢e .oonoooom mm: mamocnoam: Has: o:n nonononocn mn:MoHnH:me on on o:son no: mo: ownmn n one mn.n u Ho. no n mm.= u mo. no n .om u Nno ooo H u Hno non n oHooa sonn :mem.m om e:mm.mm masonc :Hnnoz oooo.ma mn0nmau:oz .m.z mmooo. ammo. H ammo. mononw :ooznom wnaa.ma mLOnm: oo:oo oHnom ohmsvm Eoooonn monmdom oo:oohw> :ooz _ ozonm IHnH:me =n= :ooz no moonwom no Esm no monsom HHH nDomo 2H AmmeDzHE sz_mzHe AdHEQdmme A¢eoe mne no moz no mHqu¢z¢ HHHNXA mqmoa mo. o:n no oo:moHnH:me oozocm onnmn n o:e me.o u How no n m H mm.: H mo. no n .mm u no o:o u no non n oHome Eonn mwnm.mm om mmmo.mmzm moono ononn; om:m.mm onenoe-ooz mo. monnm.: ‘ nmmm.mo: H nomw.wo: masono oooznom onoH.n: oncooz mo:mo onnmm ohmsom Eoooonn monmoom oo:mnno> :moz moons IHnH:me :n: :ooz no moonwoa no Sow no oonzom HHH nDomo zH newzmmem onmzmexm new no moanm<> no mHm%Qqu mqm :moz moons IHnH:me =n: :ooz no moonwoa no 85m no monoom HHH nbomw 2H mewzmmem ZOmeqn nHm no noz no mHmMQqu mqm :ooz ozone IHnH:me =n= :moz no moonwom no 83m no oonsom HHH noono zH meozmmem onmzmexm nmodbomm no moz no mHmMQqu mqm: HHz: o:n .onononoon mn:o0HnH:me on on o::on no: mo: OHnmn n oce mw.n u Ho. no n m H mm.: H mo. no n .mm u no oco H u no non n mHnoe Eonn ammw.mmm mm eoom.wemm mnzno :chH3 mom:.em mLOnoElcoz .m.z mm0H0.m mmHm.mmm H mmHm.mmm madno :omznom mmww.mm mnohoz oo:oo OHnmm onmzom Eoooonn monmoom oo:anm> :ooz ozonu anH:me an: :moz no moonwoo no 53m no monsom HHH nbomo 2H meozmmem ZOHmzmexm mmzm no moz no mHquNNA mqmde 106 .oonaoooo mos mHmo:noan: HHz: o:n .onononocn mn:ooHnH:me on on o::on no: mo: OHnon n oce mm.> u Ho. no n N H No.3 u mo. no n .mm u no o:o H u no non n oHnme Eonn mmmm.me om womm.m:n= moono :HonHz omow.mz oncoos-ooz .m.z momHH. . nomo.om H nomo.om masono oooznom mmmO.HH mnoHo: oo:oo oHnom ohmsom Eoooonn monosom oo:oHno> :moz moons InwaHm :n: :ooz no moonmoo no Esm no monsow HHH nbomo ZH meozmmem ZOHmzmexm quz< no moz no WHWNH :ooz ozonw anH:me =n= :moz no moonwom no Sow no oonsom HHH nbomo zH meozmnem ZOHmzmexm 3omqm no noz no WHWMH u Ho. no n mm.o u mo. no n .om u Nno oco H u Hno non n oHooa aonn NQHm.:H om mmno.mwm masono :HnnHz nmom.mH mLOnoEI:oz .m.z mmmwo.m esz.om H eHzm.om masono :ooznom e::n.uH mucous oo:Mo OHnom onosom Eoooonn monosom oo:loo> :moz Q5096 IHnH:mHm =n: :moz no moomwoo no 83m no oonsom HHH noomo 2H meozmmem ZOmeqn HerONHmom nmoqbomm no moz no mHmNH :ooz ozonu IHnH:me =n= :moz no moonwom no Sow no monsom HHH nDomU ZH meozmnem ZOmeqn Bomqm no moz no mHmMH :ooz ozone [HnH:me :n: :moz no moonmoo no Ezm no oonzom HHH noone 2H.meezmmem onxmqn mzone no moz no mHWMQHxqu mqm :ooz ozone InH:me =n= :moz no moonwoo no Ezm no oonzom HHH nbome 2H meezmnem onxmqn mmoqbomm no moonn<> no mHmNHoH Ho. J.oonoowon mo: mHmonnoonn o:n no oo:ooHnH:wHw oozo:w OHnmn n one me.e u Ho. no n m H H mm.: H mo. nHw n .mm u no o:o H u no non n oHnme Eonn mmmH.mOH om :mmm.emwm mozone :HonHz omom.=m mnonosl:oz Ho. emmmH.OH . momm.mHHH H mzwm.mHHH mozone :ooznom mmHz.em nOon oo:oo OHnom onmzom Eoooonn monozom oo:oHno> :ooz ozone IHnH:me :n: :moz no moonwoo no Ezm no oonzom HHH nDome 2H meezmnem ZOHmzmeNm MZDne no MU24Hm<> no mHWMH¢Z< >NNXH mqmfie CHAPTER V SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS Summary This study was designed with the intent of determining the relationship of physical activity, strength, and body composition to the maximal work capacity of young women. In order to realize this purpose four main objectives were selected: 1. to determine maximal oxygen capacity of young women, to determine the effect of body composition on maximal oxygen consumption, to determine the relationship of strength and maximal oxygen consumption, and to determine the differences between active and less active individuals in relation to maXimal oxygen consumption. Data on twenty-eight college women was obtained in the following areas: a. Body Composition: The body fat and fat—free body weight was calculated from predicted specific gravity. Physical Activity: Habitual physical activity was measured by an activity history recall questionnaire. lll Strength: Cable tension strength was assessed in eleven sites throughout the body. Maximal Work Capacity: Maximal oxygen consump-' tion was determined while performing strenuous work which consisted of running at a constant speed of 6 mph on a motor driven treadmill with a grade increase of one per cent each minute 6 until the subject was unable to continue. The run was preceded by a ten minute warm up walk at 3.5 mph on zero grade. Conclusions From the statistical analysis of data the following conclusions were drawn: Pearson Product-Moment Correlation l. The two body composition measures indicating the highest relationship with maximal oxygen consump- tion were body weight (r = .64) and fat-free body weight (r = .64). Body weight and fat-free body weight indicated a higher relationship with daily caloric expenditure than other body composition parameters. The cor- relations were r = .69 and r = .62 respectively. Maximal oxygen consumption and trunk extension strength indicated a higher relationship with daily caloric expenditure than other metabolic and - 112 strength parameters. Maximal oxygen consumption and trunk extension strength each correlated with daily caloric expenditure r = .59. H. The two strength measurements indicating the highest relationship with maximal oxygen con- sumption were hip flexion (r = .51) and knee extension (r = .50). 5. The best indicators of total strength were hip flexion (r = .88), knee extension (r = .84), and elbow flexion (r = .83). Elementary linkage analysis. The results of the Elementary Linkage Analysis indicated: 1. inherent relationships in strength and metabolic responses, 2. that the subjects who possessed more body fat and a greater fat-free body weight were more active and were stronger in trunk extension strength, and 3. that the subjects who possessed a greater fat-free body weight were able to consume more oxygen and were able to run for a longer period of time before becoming exhausted. Analysis of Variance One way analysis of variance using unequal subclasses was applied to determine if there were significant differ— ences between the sub-groups. The groups.as classified into sub—groups were: 113 Group I: the upper 20 per cent or "active subjects as com— pared to the lower 20 per cent or "less active" subjects determined by a one day average of caloric expenditure, Group II: the upper 10 per cent or "most active" subjects as compared to the lower 10 per cent or "least active" subjects determined by a one day average of caloric expenditure, and Group III: physical education majors as compared to non- physical education majors. Results of analysis of variance for the upper 20 per cent or "active" subjects as compared to the lower 20 per cent or "less active” subjects. The significant differences were: Body composition. The "active" subjects were heavier and possessed a greater fat-free body weight than the "less active" subjects. (Significance = .01) Physical Activity. The "active" subjects expended more energy per day than the "less active" subjects. (Significance = .01) Maximal Work Capacit . The "active" subjects possessed a greater maximal oxygen consumption in liters per minute than the "less active" subjects. (Significance = .05) Strength. The "active" subjects were stronger in trunk flexion strength than the "less active" subjects. (Significance = .01) 114 Results of analysis of variance for the upper 10 per cent or "most active" subjects as compared to the lower 10 per cent or "least active" subjects. The significant differ— ences were: Body composition. The "most active" subjects possessed more body fat, were heavier, and possessed a greater fat—free body weight than the "least active" subjects. (Significance = .01) 6 The "most active" subjects had a lower ponderal index than the "least active" subjects. (Significance = .05) Physical activity. The "most active" subjects expended more energy per day than the "least active" subjects. (Significance = .01) Maximal work capacity. The "most active" subjects possessed a greater maximal oxygen consumption in liters per minute than the'least active" subjects. (Significance = .01) The "most active" subjects possessed a greater maximal oxygen consumption per kilogram of fat-free body weight in liters per minute than the "least active" subjects. (Significance = .05) Strength. The "most active" subjects possessed a greater total strength and were stronger in hip flexion strength, hip extension strength, knee exten- Sion strength, elbow extension strength, and shoulder flexion strength than the "least active" subjects. (Significance = .05) 115 The ”most active" subjects were stronger in trunk extension strength than the "least active" subjects. (Significance = .01) Results of analysis of variance for the physical education majors as compared to the non:physical education majors. The significant differences were: Body composition. The physical education majors were heavier and possessed a greater fat-free body weight than the non-physical education majors. (Significance = :05).: Physical activity. The physical education majors expended more energy per day than the non-physical education majors. (Significance = .01) Maximal work capacity. The physical education majors possessed a greater maximal oxygen consumption in liters per minute than the non—physical education majors. (Significance = .01) The physical education majors possessed a greater maximal oxygen consumption per kilogram of fat—free body weight in liters per minute than the non- physical education majors. (Significance = .05) Strength. The physical education majors possessed a greater total strength and were stronger in hip extension strength than the non—physical education majors. (Significance s .05) The physical education majors were stronger in trunk extension strength than the non-physical education majors. (Significance = .01) 116 In general then it was found that: l. The"active"subjects (upper 20 per cent), "most active" subjects (upper 10 per cent), and the physical education majors: a. possessed more fat-free body weight, b. were more active, 0. possessed a greater oxygen consumption, and d. were stronger than the "less active" subjects (lower 20 per cent), "least active" subjects (lower 10 per cent), and the non-physical education majors respectively. 2. The physical education majors were most like the "most active" subjects (upper 10 per cent) except that the "most active" subjects displayed greater strength in more areas of the body as compared to the "least active" subjects (lower 10 per cent) than the physical education majors as compared to the non—physical education majors. Recommendations l. A valid method to assess habitual physical activity which would classify subjects into activity groups is vitally needed. 2. A larger number of randomly selected subjects are necessary to establish norms and to determine inter- relationships of body composition, metabolic, and functional characteristics of women of various ages. BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY Books American Medical Association. Handbook of Nutrition. Second edition. New York: Country Life Press Corporation, 1951. . Astrand, P. Experimental Studies of Physical Working Capacity in Relation to Sex and Age. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1952. Bard, Phillip (ed.). Medical Physiology. St. Louis: The C. V. Mosby Company, 1961. Brozek, Josef (ed.). Body Measurements and Human Nutrition. Committee on National Anthropometry of the Food and Nutrition Board, National Research Council. -Detroit: Wayne University Press, 1956. Clarke, H. Harrison. A Manual: Cable Tension Strength Tests. Chic0pee: Brown-Murphy Company, 1953. Consolazio, C. F., R. E. Johnson, and L. J. Pecora. Physiological Measurements of Metabolic Functions in Man. New York: McGraw—Hill Book Company, 1963. Johnson, Warren R. (ed.). Science and Medicine of Exercise and Sports. New York: Harper and Brothers Puinshers,' 1960. . Society of Actuaries. Build and Blood Pressure Study. Chicago: Society of Actuaries, 1959. Periodicals Astrand, Irma. ,"Aerobic Work Capacity in Men and Women With Special Reference to Age," Acta Physiologica Scandinav- ica, Vol. 49, Supplementum 169:1—90, 1960. Astrand, P. 0. "Human Physical Fitness With Special Reference to Sex and Age, " Physiological ReViews, 36: 307- 335, July, 1956. Astrand, P. O. and I. Rhyming. "A Nonogram for Calculation of Aerobic Capacity (Physical Fitness) from Pulse Rate During Submaximal Work," Journal of ApplieduPhysiology, 7:218-221, July, 195N-May, 1955. 119 Billings, C. E., J. F. Tomashefski, E. T. Carter, and W. F. Ashe. ”Measurement of Human Capacity for Aerobic Muscular Work," Journal of Applied Physiology, 15:1001— 1006, January-November, 1960. Buskirk, E. and H. Taylor. "Relationships Between Maximal Oxygen Intake and Components of Body Composition," Federation Proceedings, 13:21, March -December, 1954. Darling, Robert C. "The Significance of Physical Fitness," Archives. of Physical Medicine, 28:140-145, 1947. Henderson, Y. and A. L. Prince. "The Oxygen Pulse and the Systolic Discharge," American Journal of Physiology, 35:106—115, 1914. Holger, Wahlund. "Determination of the Physical Working Capacity," Acta Medica Scandinavica, Supplementum 215:5-74, 194B. ‘ Johnson, R. E., L. Brouha, and R. C. Darling. "A Test of Physical Fitness for Strenuous Exertion," Revue Canadianne De Biologie, 1:491-503, June, 1942. Knehr, C. A., D. B. D111, and N. Neufield. "Training and Its Effects on Man at Rest and at Work," American Journal of Physiology, 136:148—155, March-July, 1942. LeBlanc, J. A. "Use of Heart Rate as an Index of Work Output," Journal of Applied Physiology, 10:275-280, January- March, 1957. Mahadeva, K., R. Passmore, and B. Woolf. "Individual Varia- tions in the Metabolic Cost of Standardized Exercises: The Effects of Food, Age, Sex, and Race," American Journal of Physiology, 121:225—231, July-September, 1953- McQuitty, Louis L. ”Elementary Linkage Analysis for Isolating Orthogonal and Oblique Types and Typal Revelancies," Journal of Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 17, No. 2, Summer, 1957. Metheny, E., L. Brouha, R. E. Johnson, and W. H. Forbes. "Some Physiologic Responses of Women and Men to Moderate and Strenuous Exercise: A Comparative Study," American Journal of Physiology, 137:318-326, August- November, 1942. Mitchell, J. H., B. J. Sproule, and C. B. Chapman. "The Physiological Meaning of the Maximal Oxy en Intake Test," Journal of Clinical Investigation, 37:53 —547, 1958. 120 and N. Pace. "Studies on Body Composition I: Rathbun, E. W. The Determination of Total Body Fat by Means of the Body Specific Gravity," Journal of Biological Chemistry, 158:667—691, 1945. Robinson, Sid. "Experimental Studies of Physical Fitness in Relation to Age," Arbeitsphysiologie, 10:251—321, July, 1938. "A Study of Responses to Work on a Bicycle Schneider, E. C. Ergometer," American Journal of Physiology, 97:353—364, April-July, 1931. Seltzer, Carl. "Body Build and Oxygen Metabolism at Rest and During Exercise," American Journal of Physiology, 129:1-13, April, 1940. Taylor, Craig. "Some Properties of Maximal and Submaximal Exercise With Reference to Physiological Variation and the Measurement of Exercise Tolerance," American Journal of Physiologyy_142:200—212, August—December, 1944. . "Studies in Exercise Physiology," American Journal of Physiology, 135:27-42, December 1941, February, 1942. Taylor, H. L., E. Buskirk, and A. Henschel. "Maximal Oxygen Intake as an Objective Measure of Cardio-Respiratory Performance," Journal of Applied Physiology, 8:73-80, July, 1955, May, 1956- Von Dobeln, Wilhelm. "Human Standard and Maximal Metabolic Rate in Relation to Fat-free Body‘Mass," Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, Vol. 37, Supplementum 126: 1—70, 1956. . "Maximal Oxygen Intake, Body Size, and Total Hemoglobin in Normal Man," Acta Physiologica Scan- dinavica, 38:193—199, September, 1957. Isenstein. Welch, B. E., R. P. Riendeau, C. E. Crisp, and R. S. "Relationship of Maximal Oxygen Consumption to Various Components of Body Composition." Journal of Applied Physiology, 12:395—398, May, 1958. Wyndham, C. H., N. B. Strydom, J. S. Maritz, J. E. Morrison, U. Potgieter. "Maximum Oxygen Intake J. Peter, and Z. and Maximum Heart Rate During Strenuous Work," Journal of Applied Physiologyyl4z927—936, 1959. 121 Young, C. M., M. E. Martin, M. McCarthy, M. J. Marniello, E. Harmuth, and Feyer, J. "Body Composition of Young Women," Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 38:332—340, April, 1961. Young, 0., M. E. Martin, R. Tensuan, and J. Blondin. "Predicting Specific Gravity and Body Fatness in Young Women," Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 40:102-107, February, 1962. APPENDICES APPENDIX A RAW DATA ON PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SUBJECTS, BODY COMPOSITION, PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, MAXIMAL WORK CAPACITY, AND STRENGTH 124 .cofipmosum HMOfimmzmucoz n .m.mu.z mQOHpmosom ducammcm u .m.m "QOnmza A.Ao m.m:H w.oma HA.HS cauma .m.mu.z mm :.mm m.HmH m.mma mm.wm oa-ma .m.mu.z am m.mm m.m=H m.m~a mm.mm w -ma .m.mu.z mm m.m: olooa m.mma o:.mm_ .m -ma .m.m-.z mm o.mm A.maa m.mma mm.am : -ma .m.mu.z am m.mm m.mHH m.mma az.zm Ha-ma .m.mu.z mm m.m: :.moa m.m©H :m.mo A -mH .m.mu.z mm o.m: m.~oa m.omH ma.mm m uma .m.m-.z Hm 0.0m H.0HH o.mmH oo.mm 0 -ma .m.m om m.am m.=ma m.mmH om.mm m uwH .m.mu.z ma m.wm 3.:ma o.omH ,mo.mm m -mH .m.m-.z ma 0.2m .o.o:H m.AmH ao.mm m «om .m.m AH m.mm m.:mH o.mma AA.mm oa-wa .m.m ma H.0m H.0HH w.mma mm.mm A -mH .m.mu.z ma o.Hw H.3MH o.mma Amm.:m 0 -ma .m.m :H m.mm 3.AMH m.mAH Hm.~m : -mH .m.m ma 3.5m m.m:a m.mma AH.mw m -mH .m.m NH m.mm H.HmH 0.0AH mm.©o 0 .ma .m.m HH 0.0m H.NMH m.mma mm.mm : -mH .m.m OH :.mm w.mza m.ASH om.mo o -om .m.m a m.mm m.mma o.moa mm.mo a -mm .m.m m m.o© w.mma o.wwa mm.mm m -mH .m.m A :.:m m.mHH m.HmH mm.mm 0 .mn .m.m m 0.0m w.mmH m.m©H mo.mm 0 1cm .m.m m m.m© m.osa m.mma mm.am m uma .m.m : o.mm w.wma m.omH mo.mm m -ma .m.a m m.mm .m.mHH m.mmH wA.mo : -ma .m.m m o.mw N.mMH m.moH om.mm m -mH .m.m H mEmeOHHM mUCSOm mflwpmfiflpcmo mMCOCH mnpcoz 62w *cHO hm: mpomfipsm en sgwfioz CH semfimz an scwflmm 2H sgmflmm spam» an mma mBomhmbm mo WQHEmHmmBoxqu mqm¢8 125 TABLE LXXXVII RAW DATA ON PUBIC SKINFOLD, PER CENT BODY FAT, FAT-FREE BODY WEIGHT, AND RELATIVE WEIGHT 'UU) ~+m % on) U CH4.) CH 0 9—4 ca) 0 m o wiE S w x.4 +>p G)H E +>U Subject Vic ecu m cu C54 c 01m :4» a 61m.» 0 m C) EMS &) CJTSQ -HL> % IbDO ctm ,Q S-c'd pHH Law-H :52 (DO CUCD'H (DJ—>0) Q—I'r-l mm [1.33:4 Dar/)3 1 5.7 24 o 47.1 166.6 2 4.0 21 5 41.2 93.1 3 17.0 28.5 45.1 111.7 4 6.3 27.0 46.6 120.9 5 5.7 23.0 45.4 99.8 6 6.0 22.5 42.1 95.7 7 14.3 25.0 45.2 101.9 8 15.3 24.5 42.5 95.1 9 14.0 26.5 48.1 108.9 10 10.7 24.0 45.7 98.5 11 18.7 28.0 49.4 112.7 12 9.3 26.0 49.9 114.0 13 5.0 23.0 48.1 99.6 14 8.0 26.5 46.0 105.6 15 7.0 23.5 39.9 84.7 16 36.0 25.0 39.8 99.4 17 5.0 23.5 48.9 103.4 18 11.0 28.0 40.7 121.9 19 9.0 27.0 44.7 119.1 20 5.0 21.5 39.3 91.7 21 9.7 22.5 38.0 93.0 22 5.0 20.5 39.2 85.3 23 5.0 22.5 41.8 98.8 24 16.7 26.5 39.0 107.0 25 12.0 23.5 36.9 93.8 26 11.0 25.0 50.0 105.6 27 3.0 21.5 43.5 95.9 28 21.6 31.7 46.3 128.4 RAW DATA ON PREDICTED SPECIFIC GRAVITY, PONDERAL INDEX. AND DAILY CALORIC TABLE LXXXVIII 126 EXPENDITURE Predicted Specific Ponderal Daily Calorid Subjects Gravity Index Expenditure 1 1.052 12.69 1649 2 1.055 13.12 2010 3 1.043 12.22 1429 4 1.044 11.80 2261 5 1.052 12.88 2095 6 1.053 12.94 1682 7 1.047 12.84 1960 8 1.049 13:15 1377 9 1.045 12.58 2975 10 1.050 13.29 2208 11 1.042 12.58 2772 12 1.046 12.32- 2688 13 1.052 13.17 1591 14 1.049 12.69 992 15 1.057 13.62 1196 16 1.039 12.81 1252 17 1.051 12.72 1735 18 1.042 11.86 733 19 1.044 12.17 2150 20 1.055 13.07 1572 21 1.053 13.30 614 22 1.057 13.94 371 23 1.053 13.13 621 24 1.045 12.57 651 25 1.051 13.22 1381 26 1.048 13.22 2201 27 1.055 13.50 1273 28 1.035 11.66 1076 00.:0 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.0: 00.00 00: 00 00.:0 ”00.00 00.00 00.:0 00.00 00.0: 00.00 00.00 0:.:0 00.00 00.00 000 00 00.:: 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.0: 00.00 00.00 0:.00 00.00 00.00 00: 00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.0 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.0: 000 00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 _00.00 00.0: 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.:0 00.:0 000 :0 00.00 00.:0 00.00 00.00 .00.00 00.0: 00.00 00.00 00.0: 00.00 00.0: 000 00 00.00 00.:0 00.00 00.00 00.:0 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.0: 00.:0 .00.00 0:0 00 00.:0 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00000 .00.00 00.00 00.0: 00.00 .00.00 000 00 00.0: 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.:: .00.00 00: 00 00.:0 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.0: 00.00 .00.00 000 00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.:: ,00.:0 00: 00 00.0: 00.00 00.00 00.00 .00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 .00.00 :00 00 00.00 _00.00 00.:0 00.00 00.00 00.0: 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.0: 00.00 000 00 00.00 00.:0 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.0 00.00 00.0: 00.0: 00.00 000 00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 .00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.:0 00.00 00: :0 00.:0 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.0: 00.00 000 00 00.0: 00.00 00.00 00.00 .00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.0: ,00.00 00: 00 00.00 00.0: 00.0: 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.000 00.00 00.:0 000 00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.:0 00.:0 00.00 00.00 00.0: 00.00 000 00 00.00 00.:0 00.00 00.:0 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.0: :0.00 00: 0 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.:0 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00: 0 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.0: 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.0: 00.00 00: 0 00.00 00.00 00.0: 00.00 00.00 00.0: 00.:0 00.00 00.:0 00.0: 00.00 00: 0 00.00 00.0: 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.0: 000 0 00.0: 00.:0 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 000 : 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 000 0 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 :0.00 00.00 00.00 00: 0 00.00 00.0: 00.00 00.00 00.00 0:.:0 00.00 00.00 00.000 00.00 00.00 000 0 SETH SHTm Snag SHHS 833 33V 833 338 SEX 83H SH HSI S n+X.a QTLJ qunw QTLOHH n+TLI fivxu n+X_L vau. vau q+XT: 30: quo n dawn Jen JGOJGJO Jeq JQN. J10. J30 J18 .4140 dd quq aqua avxnu avxn «cxtbnu evxo ava+L 9000 each” aqua ace 3 0009 P: HUM. MIX. UI.T_UI.ZTLUT_.M uua UUM UUI UU UU UHBUIG 008 030 0009000001000 008 008 0.080. 008 008 oaIdoa 0 1T: n+u qfluqo finuuld n+u 10k n+1. lTka 64T 10: n+9 nefl. 1 U.O U. U. J U. 1a U. U.O U.O HOJ U.O U.O U.X mu. u B u u u u u I. S I 0 m. mewzmmgm zo .p:m> 0 .ummm .0000 00.0 .0000 mac Hmconumx Hmcouuux mam . .0569 00 .p03 00 x .0000 .0000 00 wcfiomwm oo 00 0090 .00 .numx .asam HaHpHsH Haacdm ho was .puau u zoom 0 x - 00 u x Hzcopuax u + u «:09 n 0 wage x mpmonpgfim musmmmpm .m 0pfiofissm man go 6:09 0030 0:0063 0500 ucw0m: mpspmpmasme cuspwumaEmB undo 000200 :0LMMMD Eoom hpOumponmq Eoom 000Eommha .oz Amemcv vomnnsm 003nm no memz Emmmm