.1 I - __ _ ..,.. .........4.. ... .. .v. ..._,.. . .. - ...... .. . .. a. .. _. o... S . . . _ . _ . .. . 'ou.o.o.v ... . .... o .. . .. ... . . v. . . . . . . ... . .. ... 1. . ..- . . . ... .. .. so. .. .. .. c. ... ‘ .. , .o _ . .1 .1. . . 1. . L _ . ..... . o . o. o D g . . . b 1 .. .. > . .. .. . .. . . v. . . o . . 1 .. . u. 1 ... . . .. .. woo... E . _. . . . . . . . . . . . . o o . . .. ... ....o .9 . ' ... .. . . .... . o . . . . o _ . v . . . n. . . o s.. . \ _. .. 1 . . . .. . . . o ...v . .v . ... .. . .1 . ~ . . . . . . _ . - . s .. . . . _ .. . . ... . .. . .. t. . . ... .1 .. . _ . . 1 . . u g. s. .. o . . 1 ... _. . a... . .. ... .. . .o o. . S . o . . . . . . . . . .. c \. . .. . o .. .1 o . . . . . .‘ . . . . . . _ .. . A . . . _ .. - .. .Q .. _- o . . . . . . . .. c . . _~ . . a . . . .~ . .. . .. .‘ . . .. 1 . . . _ _. . . . . .. . . . . . . . o . . t. _ . . . . . . . . . c . o _ . . . . . _ . . . o . _ . . u . S n . . ... . _ o. . . . a U- I Q, _ . . . a v . .. . o _ n . a . . o . . . _. .. c...... ......I.. ....r . . . . .. 2...1.-. o... ... . ... . s.- . . . .C . . . . . . . . . ‘ 1 . .. ... 1a.. a... ..o ’1 o .... . , . . . . . . ..1 .. .c .....a. . . . o. _ . ... .... ...: .... ......71. .s.la..o. . .. .. ,1... r . . . . ~...V _ o. ul..'a . . . . . _ . .1 . .. . .oal...v.o“.~’... . . . . I v.1 . /.. 40.! .4.)1_o. _ . . . .. .p no.0, r ,l.l.._. . 1 ....o,.1.l..: ...A.D .. . ., . . ... u . . . . .. c. o o ._ . . . .. . .. _ . n . . . . N 0' D. I a .4 . . . _. . .. .. . an... . . _ . .... o . _. .. ...... . 1 o . ..r c . . 1 . . ... . . ..I. . v . . . ... . ...... .1; . . .. 1 _ . a or . . 4. L EUGENE 'KINDIN- 1971 u MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY. PA. Thesis for the Degree of MS. SPECIALISTS--A MARKETING ’ APPROACH AND TECHNOLOGY FOR STATE EXTENSION . . .. o. .l . . . . . . ... ... o . . . _. .r . .. .00. a r . ¢ . o. ’. z n O . . .1. 5‘ I. . . . ,v.. . . v . a c t . . g y . o . ....r o r. a 4 v. . o. . .. . ... ., t -c . - .. a . v . . . . _ .. l . . . . . AN ANALYSIS OF COMMUNICATIONS P --....” ow-.. v I a l I I mun! “no...” -5. ”7"“??- - o O . . 1 . I 1 c I I I . . . . , . . O .n _ I . . .. q _ . . . . . . . . D.‘ .o . V r ‘ I Q . v I . 1. _ . a. .. ... I . . v c . \Q I. l .. v- o .. ....k'o .0. t . .. . ._ . 1 ... . . ...: ... ...u . v. . ... . ... o . , . . . . . ..L ...- ... .....; m. .1: ..d: ...x‘uo.u OJ . . . ..2...._.. . ... ... . .. . . .. . .....a}..$ar:.r. O l . . . . 5 . . .. ‘. . .... 7;: .37k fixfwtowfl h...) . . . o . . ...... _. . c or. . ......w. 1.. . a. L r .. L ...; . . ' . L. . o l ... ... u , .. . . o . . . .. . . . . . . Z 3.... 1 . to. . . . .. .1 .3... ...... . 1. I u o. . o . ,.. .. o . .o t . L n p o . 1.090 VOCE....-.. o .. ..O... ... (f - ... .g .Q. . u . . .. . . - I II II. I. II l'inlr WWMWIHull“WINHHHHHHZIMZHHI 3 1293 10424 622 ,{f ‘ 2 [JUL 10386; " ABSTRACT Cooperative Extension must adapt to the modern society in which it exists. No longer is agriculture and the rural way of life the most prominent feature in society. Millions of farm families have migrated to new occupations and geographic areas. They still look upon extension however, as being a vital source of useful, current infor- mation. These people, as well as those still on farms, seek out information not only about farming, but also con- cerning community develOpment, responsible government' environmental quality and in general improving the quality of their lives. Extension, to remain viable, must develop programs congruent with the needs of its' clientele. This is not an easy task. Added programs call for additional funds and trained personnel. Certain forces in society are making the acquisition of these resources increasingly difficult to obtain. The purpose of this study has been to examine the adaptability of modern communication technology to meet the increasing demand for information while averting the problems of finding additional men and money. Clientele needs were assessed via a mail questionnaire. As suspected their needs were diverse. Needs were segmented to provide fewer categories for purposes of analysis. A second questionnaire was mailed to State Extension Specialists. This survey was concerned with obtaining a breakdown of time spent for job related activities and their opinion toward possible use of modern communication tech- nology. Primary data compiled from the two questionnaires, plus selected Secondary data derived from literature and personal interviews, were then utilized to examine the adaptability of modern communication equipment. This equipment was viewed primarily with respect to its appli- cability in developing a technological sub-system for use in communicating with large and small clientele groups. Several forms of technology are available. Feasible alter- natives include tele-writer, conference call, tele-lecture and several visual transmission technologies. The feasi- bility of any one or a combination, will depend not only on the funds available, but also the size and location of audience, frequency of use and the amount of existing equipment available. The data indicate that although face-to-face contact is important to clientele and S.E.S.,* modern technology could be successfully applied. S.E.S. efficiency would be *State Extension Specialists enhanced by reducing the amount of time spent for travel, meetings and repetition of meetings. More time could be devoted to other aspects of the S.E.S.'s appointment. Additional resource personnel could be utilized, thus offering the Opportunity for more information and a wider variety of information to be transmitted. Recommendations in this study, call for the imple- mentation of a total communication system as soon as possible. Emphasis in this study is directed to the deve- lopment of one part or a sub-system to the total. Specific recommendations are pointed toward the sub-system dealing with group meetings. ' Preceding implementation of this sub-system, further~ study is recommended concerning the precise costs and ‘ benefits of the system. Further study is also necessary to formulate policy decisions. Post-implementation studies should be conducted to assess the change in clientele attitudes toward use of technology and toward extension programs. AN ANALYSIS OF COMMUNICATIONS PATTERNS AND TECHNOLOGY- FOR STATE EXTENSION SPECIALISTS--A MARKETING APPROACH BY Paul Eugene Kindinger A Thesis submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Agricultural Economics 1971 ACKDUVIHXI'HI'I‘S The author wishes to express his sincere appreciation and heart-F felt thanks to*Dr.'-Da'v1d L. Cole who has spent countless hours rewing manuscripts, formulating new ideas, and providing the proper guidance. His continued interest during this project has made possible the suc- cessful carpleticn of this research. The author wishes to thank Dr. John W. Allen, Dr. Fred J- Rabody and Dr. Ralph Hepp for serving on the oral exanfinatim armittee. The author also wishes to express sincere appreciation to all those providing valuable assistance either through interviews, helpful criticism or the questionnaires. ‘ Further admcx-zledgn'ents are expressed: To my wife Lynn, for her ready help and understanding throughout my college career. To my typist Mrs. Mary Hamiltm for her patience and expediency in preparing the final manuscript. ii TABLE OF (1333133738 Chapter Page I. INIRJDIJCI'IOK. o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 Background and Problems ObjectiveS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . HypotheseS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Procedures and Methods. . . . . . . . . . . . . Sampling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . co O‘UlU‘l-bl-d H II. m:mAI-l W“: SEW: o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 ‘met concent o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 8 Market Secmntaticn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Camumications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.3: Information Exchange ‘ 14 Source . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Channel. . . ”. . . . . . . . . . . .- . . l7 FEedlack . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Opinion Leadership . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 III.LI‘I'ERA'IUREANDPESH\ICH............. 21 Philoscohy and Purpose of Dctension 21 Extension Svstems . . . . . . Z I : I : I Z I 22 Wiscxmsin' 5 Experience. . . . . . . . . . . 26 Studies by Michigan Legislature. . . . . . . . . . 28 N. am rm. I O O O O O O O, O I O O O O O 32 The Questionnaire . . . ‘ - 32 Damranhic Factors. . I : I . Z : I : I . I I 32 Demand for Information. . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 SW 0 o 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 48 V. SEATEIDCI‘ENSIONSPEL’IAIJSTS, ', , , , , , , , . . . 49 The Questionnaire . . . , , , , , 49 State Specialists- Background Information . . . . . , 49 Methods and Purpose. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 Table Page VI. CTITTLTIICATIOZJS TEXIIIDIEKY 66 In Light of Needs 55 Toda‘r'sr-‘ethcds . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 Present Technolm’ . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 Te1e<~riter.............. 71 Conference Call . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 Tele-lectnm.............. 74 SCA-EH Multiplexing . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 Visual Cmicaticms . . . . . . . . . . . 78 . Future Technolocw 80 Picture-phone . 80 The Advantages of Technology. 82 VII . SUI-MARY AND RECO‘ 1’ EDATIONS . 0 85 Sumnary 85 O O O O O O O I O O O O O O 88 Review of Iivootheses Remdations....IIIIIIIIfI 88 mmuctim o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 90 Organizational Structure ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ' ° 91 SWSVSteP‘ m‘felmmt o o o o o o o o o o o 91 Policy and Imlementation ° ' ' ° ° ° ° ° ' ° 92 Post-Imalementation Effects ' ° ‘ ° ' ' ° ° ' 92 BIBLIQ‘RAPHY. . . . . . O . . . . . . . . . 93 ”mm A o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 95 mmm B O O O . . . . . . . . O . . . . 96 ”mm C O . . . . . . . . . . . . C . . 97 ”Pame D O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 10 4 APPENDIX E 111 APPmYDIx F O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O l 1 3 APPHDIX G O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 11 4 APPENDIX H . . 115 iv Table i Page awn-mm II. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115 APPS DIX J. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 ADPE'ITDIX K. . . . . . . . . . . . '. . . . . . .119 ADPEDIX L o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 122 Table 4—A. Educational Levels of Clientele Sampled, , , 4-8 Clientele Satisfaction with the Qualitv of Infonrnticn Presently Provided by Extension per-$033131 . o o o o o o O O 0 0 O 4-C Clientele Felt Feeds . , , , , , , , , 4-D Nunber of Tires Clientele Feel it is Necessary to Pth with S.E.S. (Under Present System) , 4-E Present ”ethoés of Presentation Clientele Find Most Educational, , , , , , , , , , 4-F Clientele Opinion of Proposed.Nedia Forms . . S—A. Age Groups of State Extension Soecialists , , 5-B Number of Years lxtension Specialists have Spent in Extension.?tmk, , , , . _ S-C .Academic Pank of State Extension Specialists . 5-D Number of Hours Worked by S.E.S. in Various ACtj'w'tieS. O O O I O O O O O O O 5-}: Opinion of S.E.S. Toward Job Related Activities S-F Number of Times S.E.S. pepeat Speeches or Wbrkshcos Per year . . . . . . . . , S-Gv Number of Hours S.E.S. Spend for Background Travel and.Contact . . . .. . . . . . 5-H State Extension Specialists Purpose of r'eeting with Clientele. . . . . . . . S-I Average Number of People Contacted by State LIST 0? TABLE State Extension Specialists . . . . . . Page 34 37 39 45 46 50 51 52 54 55 57 59 61 62 LIST OF FIGJRFS Figure Page 2-1 Scheratic du-mnstratinc the conmotual difference between production and marketing approaches. . . . . 9 2-2 . Schematic deronstrating various camications net.~.ork svstems (as per research by Gletzkow - and SILVER) 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o ‘ o 18 5-1 S.E.S. feeling toward the educational capabilities of audio and visual forms of crmmication with two-wavchanncl.............. 65 5-2 S.E.S. feeling toward their satisfaction (expected) when using audio vs. visual forms of cormunication ‘vith. USO-“"7837 (3:1li 0 o o o o o o o O o o o 65 CHAPTER I ~ DTTIIDDIIZTIOL‘I Backgrotmd and Problems ‘ It has been the philosonhy and policy of Cooperative Ebctensicn to be a problem—oriented organization. Established by the Smith- A Lever Act of 1914, Cooperative Ebctension attempts to cmduct research and encourage "a free, direct flow of communication between its people ' and the public. In its educational role, COOperative Extensim Service mst interpret, disseminate and encourage practical use of lmcwledge. \ Originally rost of this lmct-Jledge was directed toward the cxmtinuing education of famers, farm wives and their families. Since the early days of extension" 8 inception, our society has transcended our agri- cultural heritage to becane a modern, boaning, bustling, urban- suburban couplex. Today fewer than 1,000,000 comercial farms make up the core of agriculture as camared to 1914 when approximately one-third of the 32,000,000 population was still involved in agriculture.1 Thus, I a vital need for information and continuing educaticn exists not ally with rural families but, also with urban and suburban residents. Today, J‘Wittwer, S. H., Ccnmmicationnfxtension's Lifeline, A talk Presented at the Public Information Awards Banquet of the National Association of Countv Agricultural Agents, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, Sept. 10, 1971. Also unpublished journal article No. 5654 of the - Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station. the problems involved are more carplex in nature and effect a diverse cross-section of individuals, groups and organizations within our society. With the inclusion of many new programs to meet the needs of these additional clientele , present methods of commmications becane rapidly antiquated. The Extension Specialist is called upm frequently to prepare and deliver speeches, workshoos, seminars, etc. about research and information at his disposal regarding problems of concern to the various groups in society. The cost (i.e., salaries and travel expenses) of this method of informatim dissemination is becoming prohibitive in light of changing appropriations (revenue) to extension. There are several forces in our society today that add a sense of urgency to the need for research and inplementatim of more effective uethods of commmication. This sense of urgency arises fran such factors as: (1) an increasing need for extension program and personnel (under the present system) ,2 (2) already rising staff and budget requirements,3 (3) increased threat of unionization at the university level which muld lead "to restricted new programming by limiting the nunher of personnel available, and (4) the threat of reduced or restricted budgets from legislators. . One purpose of this study is thus, to examine and develop al- ternative cmmmications methods for use by extension personnel in an effort to avert the problem's mentioned above. If such problems are not fl; 2See Appendix A. 3See Appendix B. researched and planned for in advance, a serious curtailment of extension's role could result. A second problem being dealt with in this study is that of effectively meeting or fulfilling pecples' (extension clienteles) felt needs for information and services which extension is capable of pro- viding. It should be realized however, that felt needs crmprise only a portion of the total needs which clientele may possess. Total needs may include needs that are not recognized or cmsidered important. By takingwhatmaybe ternedamarketing approach, this studyhcpes to assess clientele needs for various extension programs and determine if significant market segments exist for such program. It is felt that _ by linking pecples' needs to new mmniicatim technology Extensim Specialist will be better able to plan and meet these needs. Adoption of a maflceting approach will also allow for flexibility and planned 1 change in extension programs by introducing the dynamic human element into decisim—noking. This study will not ha-Jever, suggest that any one final system is "the“ best one for extension. The primary purpose of this research is to lay the groundwork and furnish the necessary review and background to the problems. This study cannot deal effectively with the entire extension cammmication system. It attempts to look at one portion of the extension network, that cmcerned with State Eatension Specialist. It is ruled that an improved system of commmicating with clientele, can eliminate unncessary travel and contact time for the Specialist. Hooefillly this research can be extended to a broader application in the develcp'tent of a total feasible ccnmmication system which can be used in conjunction with other agencies (i.e., state departments, educational institutions, hospitals, police agencies, etc. ). . The primary purpose of this study is to examine how the present mmication system used by Extension Specialists might be improved. To accamlish this, a study will be made first of the clientele for extension programs to determine what types of information are most needed from extension. Secondly, evaluation will be made of the methods presently used by State Specialists in preparing and providing infor- maticn to the peeple. Then, an examinatim of present and future mication technology will be made. Finally, and most importantly , an attempt will be made to discuss the cammmicatims tedmology avail- able for meeting the needs of clientele. Objectives Very little if any prior research has been conducted concerning the problems mentioned earlier. Such neglect could have disasterous results in terms of the prestige of Michigan's extension programs. The dajectives are relatively broad and general in scope. They can be stated as follows: ’ (1) To determine the purpose(s) and methods of oommmication used by State Extension Specialists. (2) To delineate and segment clientele needs for extension programs. (3) Tc Study present and future cammmication technology for improving the ability of extension to fulfill the needs of its' clientele. (4) To consider possible, feasible methods of communication for use by Extension Specialists combining present and future communication technology. Hypotheses It would be extremely difficult to customize extensicn‘s offerings to meet everyone's individual needs. However, it is believed that where enough similar categories of camon interest exist, extension can segment the market for extension services. This would allow exten- sion to focus more directly on consumers felt needs. Total needs cauld be defined. and categorized in a carprehensive study. Hovever, it is hypothesized: H1 - Clientele felt needs can be defined and categorized. This study was initiated, in part, with the belief that Exten- sicm Specialists spend a good deal of unnecessary time for preparation and travel in conjunction with clientele meetings. Thus, a second hypothesis is: H2 - Improved communication technology will increase the Extension Specialists efficiency by reducing travel time thus increasing time available for other extension activities. Finally, it was believed that improved camunicaticn technology could fulfill file necessary informatim exchange function as well or better than personal cmtact for certain subject areas. This is especially true when the specialist is meeting with groups of individuals concerning areas of policy or cammmity interest. Therefore the third hypothesis is: ' H3 - Improved communications technology will allow State Extension Specialists to participate as effectively with clientele groups with respect to information exchange as would face-to-fact contact. Procedures and Methods (1) Basic communication purpose (5) and methods used by State Extension Specialists in the total learning environment were identified from semndary and primary informatim. (a) A survey of prcmdures used by Extension Specialist was made. This survey focused on typesof programs held; time necessary for preparation, travel and presentation: number of program duplications in various areas. Primary information was gathered via a mail questionnaire. » (2) Clientele program breakdown or segmentatim were viewed to determine the adaptability of various ccmmmicaticn system (equipment) . Particular interest was given to the potential for expanding areas of extension involvement. (a) Attempts were made to identify the clientele meds through a mail survey. (3) Present and future availability of cammmlicatim technologies were studied to determine their applicability to fulfilling the needs of . the clientele. (a) The degree of carplementarity between extensim advocates and those of other public and private agencies was viewed with respect to establishing complementary facilities for cost sharing benefits. Salmling Primary information for this research was derived from adminis- tering 11-70 separate questionnaires. Questionnaire number one was directed to State Extension Specialists. The second questionnaire was sent to New Horizons and Kellogg Farmer participants.4 The purpose of questionnaire number one was to determine pro- wdures med by Specialists when ccmmmicating with clientele. This 4Kellogg Farmers Study Program is a leadership program designed to help farm people make decisions on public issues. New Horizons is also a program to help develop rural community leadership. It is de- signed to help rural pepple make decisions on public issues. survey focused on types of program held,'tire necessary for preparation, 5 It was distributed travel. and presentation plus program duplicaticn. _ to 160 Specialists, part-time, and full-time with, all but two of them located on the Michigan State University Camus. A wide variety of disciplines mere represented in the total population. _ A secmd guesticmnaire was mailed to extension clientele.6 Its '- primary purpose was todiscern the types of information or'services desired or needed by them. Approximately 250 questionnaires were mailed. DIE to the nature of New Horizons and Kellogg Farmers groups, the sample was biased and a test of statistical significance could not be made. Theségroupsweredxosenbecausetheyvere felttcrepresent the leadership of a cross-section of. trelrrespectlveccrmmltles and the general tribulation. ‘ Both groups mfa‘n‘liliar with- extension and are unmity leaders (Opinion leamrs) who represent the opinions of more than just personal preferences. See Appendix C. See Appendix D. mile-y focused on types of program held,‘tire necessary for preparation, 5 It was distributed travel and presentation plus program duplication. to 160 Specialists, part-time, and full-time with all but two of them located on the Michigan State University Campus. A wide variety of disciplines were represented in the total population. , A second questionnaire was mailed to extension clientele.6 Its 'I primary purpose was todiscern the types of informetim or'services chsired or needed by them. Approximately 250 questionnaires were mailed. Due tothenature ofNevHorizms aldKelloggFarmers groups, the sample was biased and a test of statistical significance could not be made. These groupswere chosen because they were felt to represent the leadership of a cross—section of. theirrespectiye cc'xmmmities and the general tribulation. - Both mattresses: with extension and are amnity leaders (Opinion leamrs) who represent the opinions of more than just personal preferences. See Appendix C. See Appendix D. Gm II (IXICEPIUAL FPMET‘DPK Market mncept "Under the market ccncept, the customer is at the tap of the 1 "A market oriented approach involves going into organization chart. " the market place to determine what the consmer needs, waits or desires. Then a may must translate these cmsumer needs or desires into pro- "2 "Men the marketing concept is accepted as a matter of corporate philosophy, marketing becomes the ducts andmarketing program. . . . basis for designing total system of action. fimdalental strategies of the business are conceived and implemented on the basis of market needs; forces and opportunities."3 "Marketing is, therefore, not merely a limited specialized activity of the business, but rather a perspective for the total malagement team."4 1Kelly, Eugene J. and Lazer, William, Managerial Marketing - Perspectives and Viewpoints, Richard D. Irwin, Inc. , 3rd edition, 1967. 2Eickhoff, William D. , Marketing vs. R a D Orientation Among Agribusiness Firrm -- Survival by Proper Direction, A paper presented at American Marketing Association Agribusiness Conference, St. Iouis, Missouri, Nov. 6 & 7,1969. 3Kelly and Lazer, co cit. 4Lazer, William, Marketing Management - A Systems Perspective, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1971. CHAPTER II CIXICEPIUAL FPAI‘ET'DPK Market Concept "Under the market concept, the custmer is at the mp of the 1 organization diart. " "A market oriented approach involves going into the market place to determine what the ccnsuner needs, wants or desires. Then a company must translate these cmsuner needs or desires into pro- ducts a1d marketing progrars. . . ."2 ”When the mrketing concept is accepted as a matter of corporate philosophy, marketing becoues the basis for designing total systems of acticn. Pimdarental strategies of the business are conceived and inplenented on the basis of market needs, forces and opportunities."3 "Marketing is, therefore, not merely a limited specialized activity of the business, but rather a perspective for the total maiagenent team."4 1'Kelly, Eugene J. and Lazer, Willian, Managerial Marketing - Perspectives and Viewpoints, Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 3126 edition, I937. 2Eid_r;e_._ times whereas, 55.1 percent met S.E.S. 6 times or less. People when asked how often (mder present conditions) they felt it necessary to have face-to-face contact with S.E.S. , expressed a desire for more personal visits. Table 4-D shows the feelings of clientele concerning the number of times they would like to rest with S.E.S. Extension presently uses a variety of media to reach clientele and disseminate information. A number of these were evaluated to assess which ones clientele found most educational. This can be important when designing a system utilizing mdern tech- nology. Some of the fours presently used could be incorporated into the new system. Others could be continued as supplenentary information services to help relieve overloading the main channel. The methods of clientele found most educational are shown in Table 4-13. 45 Table 4-D Nutter of Times Clientele Feel It Is Necessary to ”eat With S.E.S. (Under Present System) m.::': .-- g in: m.- ‘3', .asa. “-- Nunber of Time Clientele Percent of Total Clientele. feel it is Necessary Sampled for Each to Feet S.E.S. Category Once Per Year 13.9 Every Six Months 28.5 Eyery Three Months 25.9 more Per Month , 13.3 Nbre Than Once Per I'cnth 3.8 'Ibtal 100 .0 Table 4-13 Present Methods of Presentation Clientele Find Mest qucational (in Order of Indicated Preference) Wfifi'z-xz-m-g'trz-x—r'tm ~:mm . - - -~:-&-.-‘—-33— -.z t..— - (1) Iecture With Slides (2) Pamphlets or Brochures (3) Panel Dismrssicns (4) Radio Procrams (5) Other* (6) Magazine fir'ticles (7) Lecture (8) Television E *Usually newsoaoer articles 46 Many of these methods could be directly inmr'porated into a system using rrxiern technology. This would facilitate clientele ad- justment to such a system. Clientele would find the informatim more valuable if the rethod of presentation was familiar and was one which they felt provided educational material. To test the convictions of the respondents with regard to the importance of face-to-fam contact, they were asked to indicate their satisfaction or dissatisfaction with certain prooosed media forms offering tap-wav cormmications .9 Table 4-? offers a smrnary of the results. Table 4-? Clientele Opinion of Proposed - Media Poms Clientele Opinion , Percent of Total Clientele of Prooosed Clientele Samled Holding Media Poms That Opinion ‘ Audio Visual Very Satisfied 7.0 9.5 Satisfied-about as happy as face-to-face 31,0 37.3 No Opinion 13.0 13.9 Dissatisfied-would prefer face-to—face 43.0 35.4 Very dissatisfied-would not like it at all _c_1_._1_l_ __1_._9_ No Answer ? _1: .r ' 2.0 o. - --'—-' ...—3.3: Total 100 . 0 100.0 *Both the proposed Audio and Visual would provide imediate feedback _ response. —_‘ 9 . See questions 12 and 13 in Appendix D. 47 These results are of a consisfxnt nature with those indicated by Tia-jerk and Riser. 10 They found people when asked beforehand were mre favorably disposed to personal contact or live11 situations but x-ten tested after using other media forms (i.e. , tele-lecture) they found very little difference in satisfaction between live lecture and tele-lecture. It is suspected that the sane would hold true here. This belief is based on the respomse to a question asking if they felt face-to—face contact would be as necessary with S.E.S. when scrre form of two-way ommication (radio or w, was used. Only 12.7 percent. I said yes it would be necessary; 36.7 percent said I don't know; while 50.6 percent indicated No, it would not be necessary. It is important to note the proportion of clientele (38 percent for audio and 46 . 8 percent for visual) who indicated that alternative methods of corrtmnicating may be acceptable and which would reduce the necessity for frequent face-to—face contact. These results hold tre- mendous implication for extension. Despite the evidence suggesting the inportance of face-to—face contact, a large portion of clientele sampled are willing to try alternative forms of canmmication. Imple- mentation of such nedia forms would allow the S.E.S. to reduce the amount of travel and repeat performances necessary to fleet clientele needs. It would, at the sane titre, reduce the time spent in meetings 101—3wa and Baker, on cit. Illecture-type situations . 48 This vould enable the $337.57.. to E‘Te‘gii more tire with other aspects of his appoin ent while train“ “ring a close contact with clientele and ' I . «a so --- -~ ~ their new .. . Surmarv Clientele needs can be broken dam into identifiable market segments. Their demand for information- services can be identified and classed under broad headings. The segments for information needs are relatively isolated by subject areas from one another thus allowing S.E.S. to approach problems in a more specific manner. Smaller areas of demand can be separated readin from the other major areas. Each area can be considered separately for informaticn develognent. A problem arising in segmenting the clientele market is that of determining how consistent these indicators are over tine. Clientele needs will change thus, creating some difficulty in assessing consistency. Giorll. ..I . ’\ ‘7 STATE DIVISION SPIIZLMJIST The Questionnaire Each of the 160 State Extension Specialistsl received a cover letter and a guestionnaire.2 Ninety of these, or 56 percent, were returned. The results of this questionnaire offer data concerning the anount of tire spent by S.E.S. for various job related activities, the type of cor'munication and instructional technology now being utilized, and their opinion concerning the use of different Hedia forms . State Specialists - Background Information Age is often linked by researchers to a person's values, - beliefs and attitudes thus, affecting his perception and willingness to change or innovate. Therefore, age was viewed as a possible explana- tory variable in this study. There was however, no apparent relation between age and the variables against which it was tested. It was tested against such variables as the number of hours spent for adminis— trative matters, research, travel, meetings, etc., satisfaction with 1This figure includes thirty-tam administrators. 2See Appendix C . 49 50 other nedia for-rs, educational ability of otherredia and whether they vould racer-mind tieir job to cti-nets. The age of specialists ranged from twenty-five to sixty-six years. A bimodal tendency exists with slightly larger groups at ages 25-35 and 46—55. Table S-A gives the complete breakdown by age groups. Table S-A Age Groups of State Extension Specialist -n-S ‘ ‘—. Ace Percent of Total S.E.S. in Group that Age Group 36-45 19.0 46-55 27-4 56 and above 14.4 No Answer _ 1.. Number of years in extension was ascertained in an effort to determine what effect this might have on influencing adoration of change. It was felt that persons associated with extension for a shorter period of time may be less resistant to the adoption of new methods of conumni- cations as compared to those associated for longer periods who might hold rigid traditional values. When tested against feelings concerning used and happiness with different media forms providing two-way channels, no apparent relationship was found. 51 The rance for nurter of "ears in extension was one to thirty- eicht years. Thirtv-eicht percent, the largest single group, had.been‘ ‘with extension one through five wears. Table S-B gives a.more detailed analysis of years in extensi . Table S-B Number of Years State Extension Specialists Have Spent in FXtension work -"——. ..r ~— :- NINjer of Years S.E.S. in Percent of Total S.E.S. Extension (by Groups) in Each Group 1-5 38.0 6-10 13.2 11-15 17.7 16-20 7.8 21-25 14.4 26-30 . 3.3 Over 30 "4151 98.8 No Answer _;Léa Total 100.0 The respondents were representative of 31 different disciplines or specialized areas.3 3See Appendix F. 52 The distribution of academic rank showed only a slight tendency toward the upper rams. Table S-C lists the distribution of academic rank among S.E.S. Table S-C Academic Pank of State EbctensicnSpecialists ”a Categories of Percent of Total S.E.S. Academic Rank in Each Category Professor 32.2 Associate Professor 23.3 Assistant Professor 18.9 Instructor , 11.1 Other" 13.3. No Answer 1.2 '1le 100 . 0 *‘I‘hese were mostly people who hold entirelv specialists appointments. Extension Specialists are appointed on a variety of arrangements from a few hours per week to full-time (which means that the persons total effort is deovted to extension activities). This is usually acccrplished on a percentage basis. Using 40 hours per week as a standard, 20 hours per week would be considered a 50 percent extension appointment. It is necessary in this study to discount for those S.E.S. Spending only a few hours each week in extension. This does not man 53 hat their angers h." id no rearing, it irrlies how-fever, that they cannot be considers"? of the . are irportance when Viet-Jing feelings con- cerning travel and ratings as those devoting 50 percent or more of their time to extension. The people who indicated spending 6 through 12 hours per week in extension comprised only 8.8 percent of the total. Most of their extension time was spent for either research or adminis- trative matters. The overall mean number of hours devoted to extension was 34.9. The range wasG to 63 hours per week, with the three largest groups devoting 20 (12.2 percent), 30 (12.2 percent) or 40 (31.1 percent) hours per week. Using this information as a base, a breakdown of time was made to determine how many hours per week are spent for administrative matters, research, travel, meetings with extension clientele and others. The results are depicted in Table S-D. Of those specialists who indicated spending only one hour per week in travel 3.3 percent of the S.E.S. out of a possible 4.4 percent, came from the group spending less than 50 percent of their tine in extension. The same trend was evident for meetings. Those under 20 hours per week in extension account for all of those spending one hour per week in meetings and 3.3 percent of those spending only two hours per week. Specialists were also asked to express their Opinion concerning the amunt of time spent for administrative matterns, research, etc. It was thought that specialists who‘indicated that too much time was Spent in background, travel or meetings would be more willing to accept the use of modern commmication technology. This relationship did not 54 Table 5-0 Number of Hours Worked by S.E.S. in Various Activities ~Z": Activity intage of S.E.S.) mas: (pe Number of Hours Worked Per Week Per Job Activity B-‘eetings Other“ Travel Research Admin. —17mr0836222143291 1L5m33222143281 1668nU062014 4. 291 lSS—IflwSlOlA. 4 281 119121111 llBlLlll—l a 4.].361410 311 12. 374473 6 212 1 O 364L61 212 1 o 01 o 114 “136042J18‘3114 65041617 3 in 012 3456 1.234567891111111 1131 2 O... O 1131 2 4 l O O 4 1 90457058 12222333 78 ll *Evidence suggests these matters to be primarily administrative by nature . ..~ ' U'I Ul exist. Also, it as belieed that a majority of the soecialists would feel too much tire is oresently being spent in these areas, especially travel and ratings. Table S-E deronstrates the feelings of S.E.S. toorard their job related activities. Table S-E Feelings of State Fxtensicn Specialists Toward Job Related Activities Opinion of S.E.S. Toward Each by Percent of Total Major Job . Related ActiVitieS Too Much About Right Not Enough No Answer 'lbtal Ad":1inistrative - Matters 28.9 68.9 ---- 2.2 100 Pesearch . 5.6 32.2 34.4 27.8 100 Travel ‘ 22.2 60.0 6.7 11.1 100 Meetings 13.3 63.3 15.6 7.8 100 Other _ 5.6 41.1 , 16.7 _ 36.7 100 Snecialists, with the exception of research, felt that the amount of tire being scent on job activities is about right. This finding does imnly that more tine could be devoted to research. The pro- posed use of mdern communication technology to eliminate some travel and also eliminate the necessity for reoeat performances at different tines and in different areas, could provide the opportunity for more research activity. At the same tine (all other things constant) this muld increase efficiency. Efficiency would be increased by reducing 56 the tote l necessar' tire for accr‘rr'nlishino the same basic purpose which previously required more travel and presentation time. Additional infomtion cmcerning the amount of travel, when it occurs, hot-J often srxdves are repeated etc., was included to: (I). obtain a more accurate estimate of the amount of time and number of miles driven in connection with group neetinos. This was important from the standpoint of err-raining efficiency and determining the feasibility of updern technology. (2) Help in the examination of various pieces of corm- unication technology with respect to the size of group and frequency of use expected. And (3) offer insight as to the ability of various tech- nology to facilitate information exchange. This is especially useful later when considered in conjunction with the purpose of S.E.S.!‘t'eetings. "The majority of S.E.S. meetings occurs during normal working hours.4 However, 21.1 percent said meetings occur primarily at night or on weekends. Seventy percent said that workshops or speeches are re- peated to different areas of the state. The number of tines they are nomally repeated is indicated by Table S-F. flue data indicate that speeches are repeated three to five times. If instead, S.E.S. were able to prepare one presentation, meet with all groups at once5 and react to a majority of their questions, this would eliminate duplication of materials, travel time and presen- tation time. This could be especially valuable for those who are often 4Eight a.m. to five p.m. 5It is realized that this is not always possible due to situa- tions where problems arise a presentation is given and may call for further clarification. 57 Table S-V Number of Tires State Fbitensicn Specialists Pepeat Speed-es or Foe-1531033 Per Year “» » T:_ a “a“ Number of Times Percent of Total S .E.S. Rapeating Repeated that Number of Times 1 5.5 ' 2 7.8 3 ._' 21.1 .4 . ,. ‘ 8.9 5 i 12.2 6 2.2- 8 2.2 10 , , 5.5, 12 _ 2.2 15 1.1 18 ~ .- _1_'_._1 No Answer 30 , 0 Total 100 . 0 called upon tofitravel and meet after normal working hours. The overall objective of utilizing modern technology is not to eliminate all travel and face-to—face contact by S.E.S., but is to create the means whereby extension can better utilize existing specialists, call upon specialists in mre fields and reduce the need for the sharp increase in manpower 58 prairies:- 1:1 t.‘.:; Verge said. Three additional ("".Z:‘:E-‘~‘;iCI‘£ contained in the survey were also designed to solicit information concerning travel. Two of the questions concern the arount of travel, and the number of hours spent for travel, per week, during both the academic year7 and the sumer Iront.hs..8 It' was believed that sore differences between the periods would exist due to the vacations, slmfdovn in program schedules, etc.“ Data suggests however, that this is not the case. The node for each period was 200 miles and four hours, indicating a year-round demand for S.E.S. contact and travel. 4 Specialists were then asked to supply a breakdown for bad s o I. ..U so. 42+ . oz. . u. 2.0-0 ”WW1..- Wm... -0. Jim... .. - x... ... . - - --. . . ”wing... .... 000.2 ...1 ooodu at. 0-..}: + i .. J 30.3 Rmo+ m¢ Z<<< 000. m02m~ Hmm.mmv.~ mmm.meo.m ,a.oov me-mmma eNm.Heo.m oma.mmm.~ vmm.mmm.m «mm me-neoa Ham.mmm.m Ame.nmm.m 4om.mea.m m.vmm hm-emmfl emm.mge.v cmm.aefi.m ooo.vmm.m m.«~m me-mema eem.:me.e neo.moo.~ mem.vmm.~ hoe me-eeoa mec.mim.v eoq.mao.~ Hmv.eo~.m mow we-mmoa com.eem.q mam.coo.a mam.~em.m how mo-~eoa cme.gca.e oom.ceA.H mvv.Hmm.m. oHv No-HemH mee.~mo.vw omo.coe.flm mve.amm.mm nae Hm-cemH moss; .ncLCUCL1mumum mpg nzm mpg mpg mmfim sauce Hmuotma macaw Hanna 'w 0" .. "lynfluH ,h h h rtan" "I.”“wol' 0."I" fluvflunlfluau RH ”Rubin III 'I NI”. HBIOBoH B lecmoH mtg #0595 Cam mmmflm 1|! ’.flvull|’ “tun.“ APPEMIX C 97 COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY - EAST LANSING - MICHIGAN 48823 Agricultural Economics Agriculture Hall AND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE COOPERATING Dear Extension Specialist: This questionnaire will serve as a basis for comparison in designing a new communications system utilizing newer, more advanced technology to communicate with extension‘s clientele. Since extension operates to communicate and educate its clientele, some measure of the effectiveness in these areas is needed. Your copperation by filling out and returning the enclosed qbestionnaire will contribute a great deal to this research effort. This questionnaire, along with one being sent to selected extension clientele, will ‘ constitute the primary source of data for this research. The questionnaire attempts to determine how the time of the extension specialist can be better utilized when dealing with clientele. It also tries to assess some of the basic methods utilized in . communicating with clientele. Your time and cooperation are appreciated. Any comments, criticisms, or suggestions are welcomed. - Si merely . l 6 ,%W—' Paul E. Kindinger /;;7/ Graduate Assistant Alt/zit 1c 5‘5"- David L. Cole Assistant Professor .‘Extension Specialist Agricultural Economics Thank you. PEKIDLC/cm Enclosure Return to: 98 CONFIDENTIAL Mr. Paul Kindinrer Department of A:ricu;tural Economics Michigan State I'ni‘.~=:‘:~:itv East Lansing, Micnigan 45523 Most of the items.in this questionnaire are designed so that all you.need to do is place a check beside the nest apprOpriate answer or answers. Only a.few questions ask for short responses. 5. Age: Number of years in Extension: What is your specialized area or discipline? What is your rank or title? (a) Professor (b) Associate Professor (c) Assistant Professor (d) Instructor (e) Other (Please specify): How many hours per week are devoted to Extension? hours per week Of the time devoted to Extension, how many hours per week are spent for: ' (a) Administrative matters (b) Research (c) Travel (d) Meetings with Extension clientele (e) Other (please specify): T. (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) 9. 10. ll. 99 Do you feel the time devoted to the above activities is: (l) (2) (3) Too nuch About right Not enough Administrative Research Travel Meetings ' Other When do the majority of your meetings with clientele occur? (a) During the normal working day (8 a.m. through 5 p.m.) (b) At night (c) On weekends During the academic year (Sept. 15 to June 15) approximately how much driving (or travel) per week do you do in connection with meeting with Extension clientele? ' (a) Number of miles (b) Number of hours During the summer (June 16 to Sept. 1h) how much driving (or travel) do you do in connection with meeting with Extension clientele per week? (a) Number of miles (b) Number of hours For what purposes do you most often travel to meet with Extension clientele? Please indicate in order of importance; e.g., l, 2, 3. (a) Committee meetings (b) Informational talks (c) Luncheon or dinner speeches (d) To meet with an individual (e) To meet with business executives concerning corporate problems (f) To meet only with community leaders or government officials (g) Other (please specify): 12. 13. lh. 15. 16. 100 When you have a meeting with Extension clientele, how many hours (approximate average) do you spend in: (a) Background and preparation (b) Travel (c) Actual delivery or contact Approximately how many pepple (on the average) are reached per meeting or contact? (a) l - 5 (b) 6 - 10 (c) 11 - 25 (d) 26 - 50 (e) 51 - 75 (r) 76 - 100 (3) over 100 . Do you often repeat a speech or workshoP in different areas of the state? (a) Yes (b) No If you do repeat a speech or workshOp, how often is it normally repeated? How often do you use instructional aids? (a) All of the time (b) Frequently (c) Sometimes (d) Very seldom (e) Never 101 17. If you use instructional aids, what kinds of instructional aids do you use? (a) Transparencies (b) Slides (c) Charts, graphs, etc. (d) Films (d)Fflms (e) Tape recordings (f) Programmed texts (g) Other (please specify): 18. Have you ever used any kind of telephone lecture system with twoaway communications to several areas at once? (a) Yes (b) No 19. Have you ever used a television or video tape system with two-way communications with Extension clientele in several areas at once? (a) Yes (b) No 20. If you.have used any of the systems mentioned in question 18 or 19. please comment on whether or not you like such systems and whether or not you feel they are as good or as effective as personal contact. 21. WOuld you feel as happy or satisfied with a Radio or taped presentation that provided immediate feedback as you would with face to face contact? (a) Yes (b) Don't know (c) No 102 22. Would you feel as harry or satisfied with a television or video tape presentation that provided immediate feedback as you would with face to face contact? (a) Yes (b) Don't know (c) No 23. Would you feel that a Radio or taped presentation that provided immediate feedback could be as informative or educational as a personal, face to face presentation? ' (a) Yes (b) Don't know (c) No 2h. Would you feel a television or video tape presentation that provided immediate feedback could be as informative or educational as a personal face to face presentation? (a) Yes (b) Don't know (c) No 25. With what type of person do you most often communicate when meeting with groups of Extension clientele? (a) County extension personnel (b) Community leaders (c) Farmers (d) Others (please specify): 26. What do you feel could be done to improve upon or to facilitate the method of communicating with groups of Extension clientele? (please comment) 103 27. Would you recommend your Job to a friend or colleague? (a) Yes (b) No Why? APPENDIX D 104 COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY ° EAST LANSING ' MICHIGAN 48823 Agricultural Economics Agriculture H.111 AND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE COOPERATING August 6, 1971 Dear Kellogg Farmer Study Program Participant: This questionnaire is part of a research effort currently underway at Michigan State University. Its nain purpose is to find out what types of information ygp_uould like to have or feel is necessary that can be provided by the Cooperative Extension Service. A main source bf information for this research is this questionnaire. Your cooperation in filling out this questionnaire and returning it will be greatly appreciated. Most of the questions are designed so that all you need to do is check beside the most appropriate answer or answers. There are no right or wrong answers. Respond in the manner you feel is most appropriate. The information will be handled in a strictly confidential manner. Thank you. Sincerely,- M/(k (ts/(“(- /[:n/k /’j:fl//T_Cf"‘ Paul E. Kindinger ///4% David L. Cole Graduate Assistant Assistant Professor ' Extension Specialist Agricultural Economics 105 COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY ° EAST LANSING ° MICHIGAN 48823 Agricultural Economics ‘ Agriculture Hall AND [5.8. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE COOPERATING August 6, 1971 Dear new Horizon Participant: This questionnaire is part of a research effort currently underway at Michigan State University. Its main purpose is to find out what types of information ygg_v.ould like to have or feel is necessary that can be provided by the Cooperative Extension Service. A main source of information for this research is this questionnaire. Your cooperation in filling out this questionnaire and returning it will be greatly appreciated. Most of the questions are designed so that all you need to do is check beside the most appropriate answer or answers. There are no right or wrong ans1.ers. Respond in the manner you feel is most appropriate. The information will be handled in a strictly confidential manner. Thank you. Sincerely, 6‘ ///Z: //// 4%> //¢¢: C/ //“1'Cr' (A /,/q.'C f(" Paul E. Kindinger David L. ’Cole Graduate Assistant ./ Assistant Professor Extension Specialist Agricultural Economics 106 CONFIDENTIAL Return to: Mr. Paul Kindinger Department of Agricultural Economics 203 Cook hall H.S.b. East Lansing, Michigan 48023 host of the questions are designed so that all you need to do is place a check beside the most apprcpriate answer or answers. Respond in the manner you feel is most appropriate. ' 1. In what county do you reside? . Do you live inz’" N (a) The country (b) A village (less than 2,500 people) (c) Town (2,500 to 9,999) Illl (d) City (10,000 to 49,999) (e) Large City (Over 50,000) 3. What is your highest level of education? A (a) Grade 8 or less (b) Attended High school but didn't complete (c) High school graduate (d) Attended college but didn't graduate (e) Short course graduate; specify type Specify length (f) College graduate (4 Yr.) (9) Professional (please specify): How long have you been associated with people in Cooperative Extension? (Indicate years or fractions of years) b o l 107 Hhat is your opinion of the people you have been associated with from Cooperative Extension? (a) Very satisfied (b) 83 i fied (c ) No opinion (d) Dissatisfied ) llll (e Very dissatisfied What is your opinion of the quality of information provided by those persons? (a) Very satisfied (b) Satisfied (c) :0 opinion llll (d) Dissatisfied (e) Very dissatisfied What type of person in extension have you dealt with primarily? (a) County extension personnel (b) District extension personnel (c) State extension personnel from Lansing (d) Other (please Specifyz) Illl Please lista _gy_kind of information, material or subject matter that ygg. feel would be most beneficial to you or the people in your community. Feel free to list as many as you want. (Some examples would be - material on zoning, child care, tax laws, environmental quality, farming methods, _m3rketing livestock or crops, gardening, consumer information, etc., etc. . Please list any and all areas that you feel would be beneficial or informational whether or not 1t is presently provided by Extension. " 108 9. Hhat methods of presentation that extension pepple have used do you find most educaticral? (a) Lecture (b) Lecture with slides (c) amphlets or brochures (d) Radio Programs (e) Television programs (f) Panel discussions lllllll (9) magazine articles (h) Other (please specify): l0. Can you think of some method or combination of methods fbr communicating ideas and information that you feel might be better than the ones presently being used? (please comment); . ' ll. How important to you is it to have face-to-face or personal contact with State Extension Personnel? Very important (b) Important (c) No opinion (d) Not important (e) Not needed at all 12. l3. I4. 15. 109 Would you fee a: s tisf :d or raspy if you could listen to a Speaker over 1,;13 3r T;‘-:v:he .. :ture and were able to communicate and ask cuestiC"s a: ti: rr22e t- ion \as being given as CO? pared to a live cr fa:3-:c-face lecture tyne situation where the speaker is in the room with you? (a) Very satisfied (b) about as happy as if the Speaker were face-to-face (c) No opinion (d) Dissatisfied - would prefer face-to-face contact (e) 'ery dissatisfied - would not like it at all would you feel as satisfied or happy if you could listen to and watch a Speaker over Television or Video Tape and were able to communicate and ask questions as the presentation was being given as.compared to a live or face-to-face lecture type situation where the speaker is in the room with you? (a) Very satisfied About as happy as if the Speaker were face-to-face (c) No opinion (d) Dissatisfied - would prefer face-to-face contact ...... (b) (e) Very dissatisfied - would not like it at all How often do you presently meet with State Extension Personnel from Lansipg during a twelve month period? (please indicate the number of times . How often do you feel personal contact with State Extension Personnel is desirable? (a) Once a year (b) Once every 6 months (c) Once every 3 months (d) Once per month (e) More frequently than once per month‘ l6. If information were presented to you by State Extension Personnel over Radio or Televisirn with provisions for two-way communications, do you feel that it would be necessary to meet as often with them on a personal basis? (a) Yes (b) Don't know -(c) No 'll. 00 you have any further recommendations for making improvements in the Cooperative Extension Service? (please comment): ---r‘ —-1rr 1- fl.ciilxlt Egt ..2IJ.‘..‘~' STATE L'. .... ‘_:|.__\ ‘ u «u m; .1“ .‘L.\,‘-‘ has: 27, :Tlp‘flm .‘ "dds... \ *9," ,- r "“"erSIIT; l .15: to re “‘0” 4. . .1“sz ‘ f V‘\ '4- N I F. ' e21 tril‘ l I In 3“it 1 “a H In g.:riC\Lz 110 COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY ° EAST LANSING ° MICHIGAN 48823 Agricultural Economics Agriculture H.111 AND 1.7.5. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE COOPERATING August 27, 1971 REMINDER Recently you received a questionnaire concerning the Michigan State . University Cooperative Extension communication system. This note is- Just to remind you of the importance of this questionnaire and your information input. If you have not already returned it, we would like to urge you to do so. Again, thank you for your time and cooperation with this study. Very truly yours, y-pizae David L. Cole Extension Specialist in Agricultural Economics APPEIDIX F. 111 . B ' uwlveasrrr EXTENSIONJHE UNIVERSITY O . 0 - 1 Au. ~ I 94’ or vnscc .-‘:.-..‘-l. EDUCATIONAL TELEPHONE :79?) NE TIC-72K (ET-ii) i‘ESB-l970 Superior *SGYQELO'D if (\A d 1 05' um HSDO'l DOUGLAS _/5 laser»; 1\‘.. lift'.‘ I Hurley VILAS WASP“ an awv'R Hebsiet ab 5 t Eagle River BURNETT $50067 QHoyword 0 pm“ r‘l FOREST FLORENCE ONE'DA Florence Rhineleesler POLK . Grandma MARINETTE BARRON RUSK ‘ ‘ . . Ladysrnilh Phillips 885°“ L“ O 0 LINCOLN l 3060" LANGLAoEl . D TAYLOR OCONTO CHIPPEWA Merrill Anl' ' CROIX DUNN ' O O '90 . c . . Mediord , Marine” Bogwin O J MARATHON MENOMINEE Menomonie Chippeléa F0"! CLARK Wousou Kesheno 0“,an lCE _‘ 0 e O E"sworih EAU CLAIRE-E (Neillsville OShawono DOOR Sturgeon 0 Cam, Clare 0 ‘ SHAWANO . BOY Peem wooo . . PORTAGE WAUPACA I :' Morsnfneid OUTAGAMIE ( LEAU l U 5,0 BROWN Q Kewounoe O Jacxspw W' O . Fist.” ngaco Green Bay Whitehall 3mg River 0113 fig??? 119981011 ‘JUNEAU ADAMS wauswana MONROE Waouioma Monitowoc LA CROSSE Cross 0 OSpono riondshipMARQUET EEEEEN Y Moaslon Montello groan F 22:80 VERNON 0 Lo 0 FondDuLac O G Sheboygon Siroqua SAUK COLUMBIA DODGE Plymouth RICHLANO ‘ wasw- 02w— 3°’°b°° Pam” J INGTON KEE Richlond uneou , CRAWFORD OCenier O W 1128 Pt. Washington /oa~e .. l pram, 5mm '0“ JEFFERSON WAUKESHA MIL. . Du Chien Dodgeville Nodison Jegerson Woulza’sho 0 Milwaukee 0 Lancaster GR N RACINE ' LA FAYETTE EE ROCK “Al-WORTH 97mm“ 0 O Dorlingion (5400708 Jonesville Elkhorfl KENOSHA° Kenosha l 1 0 ETN UW CENTER LOCATIONS OETN COUNTY LOCATIONS 112 UNIVERSITY EXTENSION, THE UNIVERSITY or: ::c ECUCATIONAL TELEPNCNE Superc' m— ...»w; ;--— I aha '3, PODCGLAS ‘ IVLT'H'VI.I< \CIH) IUDJ" I910 ASHLANO IRON VILAS WASHBORN SAWYER BURNETT Spooner 99'“ 1.1—I FOREST FLORENCE O O ' ONEIOA r Park FOIIS U Woodruff POLK c I MARINETTE BARRON <3 RUSK ' Shell Lake ‘ 1 OR. k LINCOLN I '°° L° ’ LANGLADE D TAYLOR l OCONTO —— CHIPPEWA Merril A . . s all a .1. CROIX DUNN gMedfoI-d O . g ' Stanley 0 . O [MARATHON MENOMINEE Baldwin Menomonie . ' ‘ CLARK Oconto ERCE WOUSOU EAU CLAIRE . River Falls I2) F‘" '3 P Eau Claire ~ SH‘WMIO I ' EPIN (2) $000!, Id PORTAGE WAUPACA ] f ‘35” 1° 5,8,8“ OUTAGAMIE C . BROWN 0 POInI JACKSON . , 5'00" 3°! . Blaclgliver Falls - ‘ ‘JUNEAU ADAMS WAUSHARA LaCrosseI gm” mover Ext-{$11 Berlinw VERNON .Viroquo SAU K H COLUMBIA DODGE RICHLAND WASH- onu- P°"°°° B D INGTON KEE Po" CRAWFORD Richlond eaver am . OCenIer K Q We: Washunqlon ,0“ JEFFERSON AUKESHA MIL. GRANT Wauwalosa 0 Milwaukee Madlm For, (2) (2) OAikinson LA FAYETTE GREEN ROCK WALWORTH RACINE Ruin. . Elkhorn (2) Cuba CIly . KENOSHA Kepoisha 2 Hazel Green I O ETN HOSPITAL LOCATIONS . = APPENDIX P S.“ 9 “cu-“w” 7“???“ 1. Vegetable Frans 2. Coils 3. Crcns 4. Dairy 5 . .Z‘ni‘ual Husban dry 6. fag. Ihgireoring 7. Horticulture 8. Food Processing and Nutrition 9. Poultrv 10. Home Economics 11. Eactension R search Editor 12. Fruit Cross 13. Marketing 14. Ceneral Agriculture 15. Vet Medicine 16 . Adult Education 17. Manoower Training 18. Family Housing 19. “Public Polio; 20. Farm Management 21. l-Iematology 22. Landscape Architecture 23. Plant Pathology Adm'nistratim 11 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. Puntimloav Forestry Agricultural Eoonanics 4-H Youth Fur Bearing Animals Fami. 1y Living Tourism and Recreation APP END. .IX G R I...“ A 5 '.~ C ' " «,3 " § ' an not .-*~ 0 t 9 cost -or Y‘I‘Tfl ang anoitiomal e.vt. enSion ‘. w‘xu..~. snooialists under t‘e recs-renditions o‘. "A Pemle and a Soirit" based on past hudcet flare“ and estimates. '- Trmml Trainees For "er—fiv‘i‘nt 9.17.5. (T‘iscal Year 19711-71) Instate Travel” $244,289.76 *Figure includes only S.E.S. It includes lodging, meals and mileage. Excluded are figures for travel in hcme community, outstate, and transportation only. These categories are minimal and are not in line with the major thrust of this study. Average cost of instate travel per State Extensim Specialist. (based on 135 snecialists as of 1 July 1971) is: $1823.05. Salary licenses for S.E.S. (Fiscal Year 1970-71) Specialists on1y* $1,788,000.00 *‘Ihis figure is the budgeted amount actual spending may be slightly less. ‘ I Average Salary for Specialists (based (:1 135 specialists as of 1 July 1971) is: $12,503. This mans that the average expenditure for salary and travel per year/per specialist is $14,326.05. The USDA-NAM report "A People and a Spirit" estimate that an average increase of 95 percent in personnel to meet remanded program requirements by 1975. For Michigan this means approxinately 15 new specialists must be added each year to meet this prediction. This would require an additional $214,891.00 per year for salaries and travel alone, based on nresent figures. s v. _ ' E 1" nfi‘Ju I APPENDIX H 115 . 3 sabotaged 634383.41on ooo.Hm\uauuaEmcmNe .2 .8; m3 8. 8:5,: .8: Nahum man .9: .89 86mm . Acmmumcw can: we >9: uoxmoam S .oomm mafia: cunts/N .ocoJm emerged.» 83> 58:8 HBuHEmcmuu 83> flung-MI: ; $396036. 8 .mcfi “EEC Imamu 535.00% 3396 I030. my :83 80:889.. . “some mwaoao ..ng 3 89.: $55933 03H. . on: 955933 HmSUHcrm cm mgflg sfimm .nEmceup. 8Hc> mscecmuHSEHm .>c31C:C >Hamu..fimoa £03ch ICHQOH .mOm xcfl ccfimbo Beacon «Em Mecca fifimcoc Hmwowim a new: ”in: ugwwoe 9F .HOuUCrCMC cocaine/0 5.. H96 Mme/db?“ Hcflocam can unbuwfimqwb ctr >358 83> .923 mac um moose H5750m Cu HwMHCuQE,rCCu kc: .wccrceficu >ucc~cuo cw Cu >HHCU Iwumzcoom rocccccco mx~.¢»:.um>wabcb rec nouuflEmcguu eHwEwmcmL .CCCH> Mom 0:0 .28 $.35... MOM 08 60:05:33 Sago 03» Cu 31.6 Ifluadcoom cabooccco 8 >59 {on Hmwontm cc c9533 acetone:— m0 558 cQw>..nUcu an 9.3%? 83> .mcoUwUOH xem we keep— mm Cu 3GB I03“: “550qu 0.592 5339500 uwugpcbc 830.3 x8 0x Beau—vows can usages amt—made Clucc 7.195.7— “.17:er UwCCLpCC~¥ LCiUA> «rnuczcm: 8H3 is EQUEMHG H«wOU fivgcmm 5392082 Hgflvwmscmz 0:82 pppnmrx I 116 Conference call basically, implies the cost of a long distance telephone call. 'I‘Ee charne is determined by the length of the call plus the distance (in airline miles) from the originator. Fach location is figured. as a separate call. (the table below demonstrates the rate schedule used by Bell Telephone (*) in camting the charge for each separate call: Number of Miles Cost Per Minute 0 - 20 5¢ 21 - 25 10¢ 26 - 30 15¢ 31 - 50 20¢ 51 - 100 25¢ 101 - 200 30¢ over 200 35¢ For instance, the distance to Grand Rapids (in airline miles) from East Lansing, is 59 miles. The rate per minute would thus be 25¢. For a one-hour conference call the diarge would be $14.75. All wnference calls must be handled through an operator allowing the lines to be interconnected. Portable Conference Unit When commication to groups of two or more people is desired at any one location, it is necessary to rent a unit such- as the Bell SO-A portable conference set be plugged directly into existing loudspeaker systems. There are charges in addition to the actual call associated with this equipment. The following table lists some of the possible costs: 117 Charge Description $10.00/oer rent“. Pental fee for each SO-A unit. $50.00 Installation charge for each unit (Usually a one tire charge if a unit is kept in operation) $8.80/per jack Wall-jack installation (this allows the conference unit to be moved from rocm—to—room etc. thus allowing individuals and agencies to share a unit). The rates in this appendix are typical for Michigan. They can be used to price a typical svstem under varying time, distance and equipment re- quirements . The conference set is not designed to Operate back-to-back. This sinply means that the originator must use an ordinary #500 i (or its' eguivalent) telephone. This is necessary to avoid unwanted distortim in the voice transmission. APPENDIX J 118 Tele—lecoxe involves the installation of a dedicamd or private line from or e mint dire'xlv to anoter. Once this line is in operation I I I ‘ it 3.5 aaili re f') n a 24' .c .11“ per 61. v has is. No additional long-distance charge is raffle outside the monthly rental fees. 'lhe following table lists and describes the costs involved: Cost Description $35,00/per mnth Rental fee for each unit (one unit = a handset and speakers) $35.00-S40.00/per unit Installation diarge (one-time fee) $8.80/per jack . Installation charge for wall jadc (only when desired) 55.00-56.00/per month Rental fee for Business line (a line between offices - only when needed) $4.25/per mile Rental fee for use of transmis$ion line (figured on airline mileage)“ MThe rental of the necessary private line between Fast Lansing and Grand Rapids is calculated: 59 miles x $4.25 per mile = $250.75 per Honda. As a means of cozparison, the conference call for one hour to Grand Rapids was approxirately $15.00. The freguency of use between East Lansing and Grand Rapids can be figured by dividing $15.00 into $250.00 for the tele-lecture line. I‘mroxiraately 17 hours of conference call could be trade for the price of one nonthly rental charge for the tele-lecture line. APPFNDIX K SCA-ETN Schedule - 119 University Extension March 15‘20’ 1971 The University of Wisconsi. * ;;_c Slipntele Coordinator (1) (2) (3) 3‘- .1: “;t" Ere r rs Ce-ccaity IAudrey Sponem EZN . no no : 3.an ;3c:l I -urma io“ Programs Faculty or Pat Cantrell SCA l 9:00- :Comrunity Progress Cormunity Bob Dick ETN no no 13:00:" lStaEf Conference Programs Faculty SCA 1:30- ITeleconference Directors, Co- Dorothy ETN. yes yes 3:80pm lop Staff Develoo- oriinators, & Hutchison SCA ’ment a Nursing In-Staff Devel- Inservice Education opnent Directors 4:30- Learning Students Jack Ferver ETN yes yes 1:00pm Environments for David Davis Inital Education 7:00- Poison Information Health Profes- Ann Johnston ETN yes yes 5:30pm sionals and SCA Others 8:00- Great Decisions Public Helen Wenberg ETN yes yes o'3Opm 1971 SCA. 7-30- General Medical Hospital Staff Ann Johnston ETN yes yes 8'3Qam Seminar SCA 8:30- Community Programs Community Audrey Sponem ETN no no 8'SOam Daily Information Programs Faculty or Pat Cantrell SCA 10:00- 12:00am Introduction to Librarians ' Muriel Fuller ETN yes yei Library Science Employed in (A50) Small Public Libraries 12:00- General Medical Hospital Staff Ann Johnston ETN yes yefi 1:00pm Seminar SCA ' 1:00- Medical Library Medical Ann Johnston ETN yes yes 3:00pm Seminar Librarians ' SCA 4:30- Science & the N Elementary Walter Wheeler ETN yes ye 5:30pm Elementary School School Teachers Teacher 6:30- Interaction of Health Ann Johnston ETN yes ye 8:00pm Health Professionals Professionals SCA SCA-ETN Schedul Librarians & Media Specialists ists in Public & Private Ele- mentary & Sec- ondary Schools 120 University Extension Page 2. - The Linkwrsity of l’isrtr‘sin L -:—: T011: 1 . Clientele ' Coordinator (1) (2)01 'c-Jo- clan-ins ;;w '1::crested Arnon Allen. ETN yes yes 9:309n [Probate Code and yublic ‘"°:ate Plannir' [ 8:30- ‘Comxunity 3:01: ms 'Community Audrey Sponem ETN» no no 8:50am Daily Information Programs Faculty or Pat Cantrell SCA 9:00- Hospital Hospital Ann Johnston_ ETN 'yes yes 10:00am Administration Administrators SCA 12:00- Hospital Hospital Ann Johnston ETN yes yes 1:00pm Administration Administrators SCA 1:30- Nursing Seminar Registered- May Hornback ETN yes yes 2:30pm Nurses SCA 7:00- Medical Technology Medical Ann Johnston ETN yes yes 8:00pm Technologists SCA 7:30- General Medical Hospital Staff Ann Johnston ETN .yes yes 8:30am Seminar SCA 8:30- Community Programs Community Audrey Sponem ETN no no 8:503m Daily Information Programs Faculty or Pat Cantrell SCA 9:50- Continuing Educa- Public Muriel Fuller ETN yes yes 12:00am tion for Public librarians Librarians 12:00- General Medical Hospital Staff Ann Johnston ETN 'yes yes 1:00pm Seminar SCA 1:00- Workshop for Clerical Doris Baker ETN yes no 3:00pm Clerical Personnel Personnel in SCA' in Departments of County Depts. of Social Service Soc. Service 3:30- Nursing Seminar Registered May Hornback ETN yes yes 4:30pm Nurses SCA 6:50- Continuing Educa- Librarians & Muriel Fuller ETN yes yes 9:00pm tion for School Media Special- 121 SCA-ETN Schedule University Extension _ Page 3. The Univanity o: LlsccnSLn L; “ ' I 2!? Clientele Coordinator (1) (2) 413) 35 CJ- iComr.1ity Programs Co“nunity Audrey Sponem ETN no no {8:50am ;Dail Information Programs Faculty or Pat Cantrell SCA i i 19:00- SYouth Emphasis 4-H Youth Agents Norm Everson ETN no no EllzCOam i :l?:30- Pediatrics Pediatricians Ann Johnston ETN yes yes il’BSpm Follow-Up SCA 1:30- Seminar in Hospital Hospital Ann Johnston ETN yes yes Z-BGpn Housekeeping Housekeepers ' SCA " 4:00- Communicative Health and Ann Johnston ETN yes‘ yes :5:00pm Impairment of the Health Related SCA , Brain Damaged Personnel Adult 9:45- Nursing Seminar Registered May Hornback ETN yes yes 10:45pm Nurses SCA ‘ APPENDIX L 122 n q n ‘ , o n ..I n a o ' a FK‘cA-wvvv “.....na...,.....g "Alanna-nan ‘l-at‘fi‘“? ‘r‘ "‘r-rwrvfi“. u .- ...4 - ----- _- - -- ,- - _ a. \. ... ... .... .. Educational abrasion in rdiciucan is now represented by three full tire staticrrz and. a fourth tire—shared station. The existing tele- vision stations are: (1) Bay City won-Iv Channel 19 ()ruerated by Delta College (2) Detroit VIEWS-“IV Channel 56 (berated. by the Detroit Educational TV Fomdation (3) Mt. Pleasant RUM-“IV Channel 14 (berated by Central Michigan University (4) Onondaga t-r'SB—Iv Channel 10 Operated by the Board of Trustees of Michigan State University. (Soon to be converted to UHF Channel 23) . The Capital cost plus the annual transmitting Operation cost based on a sixty hour per seek operation for each of these stations, is given below: Annual Transmitting Station Caoital Cost __Operatimal Cost Bay City Channel 19 $612,500.00 $49,600.00 Mt. Pleasant Channel 14 610,200.00 49,600.00 Detroit Channel 56 . 62,100.00 Lansing Channel 23* , 612,500.00 49,600.00 *Proposed These figures show the limitations of extension trying to establish an educational TV network of its' own. However, there does exist a strong possibility of utilizing such existing facilities on a cooperating basis Cost-sharing for the annual oncrational costs is not irmrcbable. The figures were taken from the Janskv and Bailey Report supplement to the McBride Educational Television Feasibility Study, July 1967. The Bigineerino Feasibility Study was conducted under the auspices of Atlantic Research Corporation, T'.’a.shingtcn D.C. 1 set 1 1,100 ft. Misc. 1 set 123 T... .Wq.‘—r~r C‘w~"— I- F‘ .7 - . rst; .-ai C..;-al Cc to for If? Station "' \ firn Va...”- rrvn "- I‘."‘ "1 33(1"J\J(} lLln-LJ 1.». ' ‘ l'kl‘J‘) T1to rlokgxg H ' a N‘ ‘. \ “WY-3‘1 *- i .\ .\‘.|4. .--—4 ‘- . q JD-kilcwatt transmitter, including sideband filter, diplexer and harmonic filters Spare Tubes Transritter Control Console, including picture and waveform monitors and local slide equipment Transmitter input and monitoring equipment (Md, 1,000 foot antenna smaporting tower Antenna, 30-gain with lightning protector RF load and wattmeter 6-1/8 inch transmission line (in- cluding hangers, elbc‘ms, etc.) Line pressurizing equipment Fixed hangers, adaptors, inside fittings, hardware kits, clams, conn- ectors, valves and gassing accessories. Test equipnent Land (40 acres) Building, site irprovem‘ent and roadway Furniture and fixtures Installation, legal and engineering, freight Contingencies Tbtal Cost $210,000. 15,000. 13,000. 18,500. 150,000. 35,000. 3,700. 34,000. 1,500. 2,500. 7,800. 40,000. 40,000. 2,500. 19,000. 20,000. 612,500. 124 Trans"; itter “re-rating Costs 1. (fimical 30 71717?) Annual Cost 60 hours per reek 100 heurs per week AC Poker (200 inc/h at .03 h-Ph) $18,700.. $31,000. Tubes and parts 9 $2.75 per hour 8,600. 14,300. Building and property maintenance 2,500. 2,500. Toner maintenance and painting 800. 800. Technicians 9 ,000 . 18 ,000 . Supervision 10 ,000 . mg. Total $49,600. $76,600. 2. (Typical so It! or) Annual Cost 60 hours per week . 100 hours per week AC Power (300 kw/h at .03 kwh) $28,100. $46,800. Tubes and parts @ $3.75 per hour 11,700. 19,500. Building and property maintenance 2 ,500. 2,500. Tower maintenance and painting 800. 800. Technicians 9,000. 18,000. Supervision - 124099.. w. Total $62,100. $97,600. *‘Ihese appendices are provided to deronstrate the very high capital outlay required to establish an individual television station. HICHIGRN STQTE UNIV. LIBRRRIES lllllll |||| llllllIIl 4H HHIIIIHI “NH 0 312931 jZ46222