' Ni |-“J _',¢ 6 . 3. -' ,..-‘ . ‘-":?3‘:3g;:3’_}.§§§’?‘;c}'s 'y _. :- .- a. oA 'J . f; . . _ n. . “,wfirn asuea-N'vx‘uwv‘fv‘flv'movdflnqwm POPULATEON CHANGE IN CENTRAL SOUTH-MAMPRUSI, NORTHERN GHANA ~ Thesis for the Degree of M. A. MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY JOHN SEBIYAM NABILA ‘ ' 1970 \IUIHWH“\||H\|l\\“|\“\|\|\\HHHIHHIJINMHW ,1“wa g;— 3 1293 10437 ABSTRACT POPULATION CHANGE IN CENTRAL SOUTH- MAMPRUSI, NORTHERN GHANA by John S. Nabila Population change is a dynamic equilibrium between forces of increment and forces of decrement. Thus, change in the population of any country or place can only happen in two possible ways; through repro— ductive change (natural increase) and/or net migration. One of the most important demographic facts about a population is its rate of change. How the population of a locality, a region or a state changed to be what it is today in comparison with those of other areas and how its population may be at some future date is one of the major concerns of geographic analysis. The present study focuses its attention on population change in Central South—Mamprusi, Northern Ghana, during the twentieth century. The analysis centers on the components of population change with emphasis on the mechanisms by which the change took place. For the early period population change was accounted for at the local council aggregate level, that is, considering Central South-Mamprusi together. For the period between 1948 and 1960 the enumeration areas of the 1960 Ghana census were utilized in an attempt to account for differential population growth patterns. Simple and multiple regression analyses were the basic statistical techniques employed in estimating the relationships between pOpulation growth and thirteen selected independent variables which John S. Nabila are directly or indirectly related to population change. Central South-Mamprusi forms part of the Voltaic family and lin- quistically belongs to the Mole-Dagbani association which covers a major part of Northern Ghana and Upper Volta. The study area is known to have been settled for a very long time, perhaps before the neolithic period. One of the major aspects of the area's human geography is its peopling by small groups from further North, beginning about the 15th century. These immigrants from the North developed a system of traditional authority and today there is a hierarchy of chiefdoms. This system of authority has been of paramount importance in considerations of the general develop- ment of the area, including trends in population growth and distribution. Though earlier censuses were not very accurate, they do indicate that population has been increasing in South-Mamprusi since 1900. At the turn of this century both birth rates and death rates were very high. The occurrences of epidemics, such as the influenza epidemic in 1918, cerebro spinal menengitis in 1921 and sleeping sickness in the 1930s, raised death rates. However, the establishment of health centers coupled with the control and eradication of the epidemics has helped in considerably reducing mortality rates, especially infant mortality. There has been a general desire for children to help in the sub— sistence economy, hence until quite recently children were regarded as an economic asset. This factor, for a very long time, tended to raise fertility levels. Indeed, the customs and religion of the people do favor high fertility. Thus, though the death rates were high, the population continued to increase considerably. Between 1911 and 1921 it increased by 54.3 per cent while between 1931 and 1948 it increased by 34 per cent. The reduced John S. Nabila growth rate in this latter period was caused by the sleeping sickness epidemic. Between 1948 and 1960 there was an increase in population of. about 54 per cent, thus giving an intercensal growth rate of about 3 per cent per year. In an attempt to understand the factors that account for population change, it was hypothesized that traditional authority, density of population, education and urbanization, have direct relationships with population change while distance from main roads and urban centers have inverse relation- ships with population change. The results of the multiple regression model supported the hypotheses formulated at the beginning of the study. Cultural considerations, namely traditional authority and related subjects are the most important factors directly associated with population change. Den- sity of population, urbanization, internal migration, and immigration from neighboring African countries were also found to be important factors affecting population growth. Long distance emigration from SoutheMamprusi was found to be insignificant. It was, however, difficult to explain from the results of the multiple regression model or the data available to the author, the specific contributions of the major components of population change, namely, reproductive change and net migration. This was largely due to lack of any relevant data on the vital statistics of SouthéMamprusi. POPULATION CHANGE IN CENTRAL SOUTH- MAMPRUSI, NORTHERN GHANA By John Sebiyam Nabila A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Department of Geography 1970 PREFACE The author takes this opportunity to express his gratitude to the Paramount Chief, Divisional Chiefs —- his father being one of them —- and people of Central South—Mamprusi for their cooperation during his field work. Appreciation is also expressed to Dr. K. B. Dickson, Dr. George Benneh and Mr. S. K. Gaisie, all of the University of Ghana for the initial help they gave in directing the author's field research. He is especially grateful to Dr. John M. Hunter, Department of Geography, Michigan State University, for his encouragement and suggestions in the writing of this thesis. In addition, the author is grateful to Dr. Robert N. Thomas and Dr. Stanley Brunn all of Michigan State University, Department of Geography, for their helpful suggestions. The writer is especially indebted to his father, Wulugunaba— Sebiyam, for his good understanding in helping the author to purchase a Japanese Honda 125cc. (motor cycle) for his field work. Finally,the author is grateful to the Scholarship Committee of the University of Ghana for awarding him a post—graduate scholarship to do further studies in the Department of Geography, Michigan State University. ii PREFACE. LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES. CHAPTER I II III INTRODUCTION: TABLE OF CONTENTS Definition of Population Change . . . Theories of Population Gorwth . . . . Content of Population Geography . . . Purpose and Scope of the Study. . . . The Study Area. . . . . . . . Content of the Study. . . . . A REVIEW OF LITERATURE. . . . . . UOUU> E. F. THE PROBLEM AND STUDY AREA . General Concepts of Population Growth Population Growth in Ghana. . Components of Population Change . . . A Consideration of Variables. 1. GJNChUIbLON Basic Assumptions about the Study: Dependent and Independent Variables . Fertility Ratio . . . . . Density of Population . . Migration and Sex Ratio . Place of Birth. . . . . . Education . . . . . . . . Traditional Authority . . Urbanization and Distance The Dependency Ratio. . . DATA AND METHODOLOGY. . . . . . . A. Sources of Data . . . . . . . 1. 2. 3. National Censuses . . . . National Archives . . . . Sample Survey . . . . . . Ho Ho H. Factor Hypotheses. Page ii vi 27 27 27 28 28 CHAPTER Page B. Methods for Analysis of Problem . . . . . . . . . . 30 1. 1900- 1948 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 2. 1948—1960 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 3. The Multiple Regression Analytic Method . . . . 31 4 Residuals from the Regression Model . . . . . . 35 IV POPULATION GROWTH 1900-1948. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 A. PeOpling of the Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 B. Population Growth 1900—1948 . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 1. Population Growth 190091921 . . . . . . . . . 43 2. Population Change Between 1921 and 1948 . . . . 49 V POPUIAATION GIANGE "‘ 1948—1969. 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o o 59 A. Population Change 1948-1960 . . . . . . . . . . . 59 1. Results of the Multiple Regession Analysis. . . 64 2. Factors Accounting for Population Growth.. . . . 65 (a) Traditional Authority. . . . . . . . . . 68 (b) Urbanization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 (c) Education. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 (d) Another Locality . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 (e) Density of Population. . . . . . . . . . 78 (f) Foreign Born . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 (g) Sex Ratio. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 (h) The Distance Variables . . . . . . . . . 81 (i) Born in this Locality. . . . . . . . . . 82 (j) Dependency and Fertility Ratios. . . . . 85 (k) Born in Another Region . . . . . . . . . 86 3. A Consideration of the Residuals. . . . . . . . 86 Post-Censal Period - 1960—1969. . . . . . . . . . . 92 1. Fertility and Mortality . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 2. Internal Migration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 3. Immigration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 4. Out-migration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 VI SW AND CONCLUS IONS 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I O O 102 GLOSSARY O O O O O O O O O C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 110 APPENDICES . O O O O O C I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I O 111 A(l) Dependent and Independent Variables . . . . . . . 111 A(2) Matrix of Simple Correlations . . . . . . . . . . 112 B. Enumeration Areas with Per Cent Population Change and Residuals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113 C. Questionnaires for Field Survey . . . . . . . . . . 114 BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 iv TABLE 10. ll. 12. l3. 14. 15. 16. 17. LIST OF TABLES Hierarchy of Traditional Authority . . . . . . . . . . . Composition of Population by End of 19th Century . . . . Population Growth — 1900-1921. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ethnic Composition of Population in Gambaga 1921 . . . . Population Growth 1921—1948. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Incidence of Sleeping Sickness in Ghana 1932-1939. . . . Immigrants from North—Mamprusi and Upper Volta . . . . . Number of People Enumerated from Northern Territories in the Colony and Ashanti, 1948 . . . . . . . . . . . . . Population in Mamprusi, 1960 by Divisions. . . . . . . . Composition of Population by Ethnic Groups, 1960 . . . . Analysis of Variance Test for Significance of the Simple Correlations and (b) the Standard Partial Regression coeffiC1ents O I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 Summary Table for the Stepwise Regression Model (LSADD and LSDEL) O O O O O O O O O O C O O I O O O I C O C C O 0 Ghana, Total Fertility by Ethnic Group and Urban/Rural . Short and Long Range Mobility by Ethnic Group and Sex, Northern Ghana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mean Number of Children Ever Born to WOmen by Age Group. Total Fertility and the Number of Deaths for the Past NO Years 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 Long Distance Migration in SouthuMamprusi. . . . . . . . Page 42 43 44 48 51 55 57 58 61 62 66 67 70 71 93 94 100 FIGURE 10. ll. 12. 13. 14. 15. LIST OF FIGURES Central South-Mamprusi-Location. . . . . . . . . . . . . Central South-Mamprusi-Relief. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Central South-Mamprusi-Cross-Section . . . . . . . . . . Central South-Mamprusi 1960 Census Enumeration Areas . Boundaries of 1960 Census and Author's 1969 Field Survey Enumeration Areas for the Multiple Regression Analysis . Evolution and Distribution of Settlements. . . . . . . . Ghana, Density of Population - 1921. . . . . . . . . . . Incidence of Sleeping Sickness in Ghana 1919-1939. . . . Northern Ghana, Density of Population, 1960. . . . . . Population Change 1948-1960. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Population Pyramid - 1960. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Distribution of Population - 1948. . . . . . . . . . . . Distribution of Population - 1960. . . . . . . . . . . Residuals from the Step-wise Deletion Program. . . . . Page 29 32 33 40 47 53 6O 63 80 83 84 88 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION: THE PROBLEM AND STUDY AREA Definition of Population Change Population change is a dynamic equilibrium between forces of increment and forces of decrement. Thus, change in the population of any country or place can only happen in two possible ways: through reproductive change (often called natural increase)1 and net migration. Reproductive change is the balance between births and deaths while net migration is the balance between in-migration and outdmigration. AccOrding to Bogue, if we know the population count as of a particular date and keep track of the number of occurrences of each of these four components of growth, we can calculate the population of any later date. By using the demographic book-keeping equation, this can easily be worked out, for example: Pt - Po + (B-D) - (MieMo) Where Pt is the later population count, P0 is the earlier popu- lation count; B= births during interval between Pt and Po; D - deaths 1Reproductive change is not a more "natural" source of change in comparison with births and deaths. Besides the net effect of fertility and mortality is not always to increase population. Hence, the term, "natural increase," is a complete misnomer: Bogue, Donald J., Components of Population Change, 1940-50; Estimates of Net Migrations and Natural Increase for Each Standard Metropolitan Area and State Economic Area. Scripps Foundation, 1957, p. 1. 2 deaths between the two periods; Mi and Mo = in-migration and out-migration respectively, for the interval between Pt and Po. Theories of Population Growth Theories of population have been suggested by many people in an attempt to explain the main influences, especially with respect to fer- tility, of population growth. Coontz has classified these theories into three categories: biological, cultural and economic.3 Biological theories stress that the law regulating human popu- lation growth is basically the same as that regulating the growth of plants and animals. This view which relates fertility to nutrition and density has found different exponents in the last two centuries. De Castro, for instance, hypothesized that there is an inverse relationship between protein intake and human fertility. In his analysis, he associated low productivity and high productivity to hunger, especially specific hunger of proteins, minerals or vitamins. Cultural theories of population growth emphasize the role of man's character and culture in influencing his fertility. Declining fertilities in advanced countries is said to be due to the influence of desires for higher social and economic status and for more luxuries and pleasures in life. More often than not, many people have suggested increased education 2Bogue, Donald J., Principles of Demography. John Wiley and Sons, 1969. 3Coontz, S. E., Population Theories and their Economic Interpreta- tion, Routledge and Paul, London 1957. 4de Castro, Josu, Geografia da fome, (Geography of Hunger). Livraria - Editora da Casa do Estudiante to Brazil, Rio de Janeiro, 1953. 3 and urbanization as determinants of fertility decline in some parts of the world, especially in the advanced nations. Economic theories of population growth emphasize the significance of economic relations in social change. It has often been suggested that there is an inverse relationship between social status and fertility. Con- ditions of fertility, migration and geographical distribution of population are regarded as being essentially responses to economic conditions. Stress ing the role of economic factors, Zelinsky suggests that the economic char- acteristics of an area exert a much more direct effect upon its population than do its physical characteristics.5 Content of Population Geography Population geography has been described as the empirical, spatial and mathematical study of human populations. It focuses its attention areally on three readily observable human phenomena: (1) change in popu- lation size (growth or decline) (2) the composition of the population and (3) the distribution of population in space. It is interested in how the size, composition and distribution of population vary throughout space, whether at present or through time. Thus, population geography is con- cerned with demonstrating how spatial variations in change, composition and distribution of populations are related to spatial variations in the nature of places. A place in this context, may be a territory of any extent from a minute area to the entire surface of the earth.6 5Zelinsky, Wilbur, A Prologue to Population Geography, Prentice- Hall, Inc., New Jersey (1966), p. 34. 6Thomas, Robert N., Seminar notes on population geography, Geo. 804. 4 Therefore, the study of population change is a legitimate field for geographers. How the population of a locality, a region, a state, or even a continent, changed to be what it is today in comparison with those of other areas, and how its population may be at some future date, is one of the major concerns of geographic analysis. Trewartha has remarked that, "....any comprehensive geographical analysis of a region should take into consideration, factors of differential population growth rates, both as it applies to areas beyond, and outside the re- gion in question, and likewise, to the several localities which comprise the region. Both inter-regional and intra-regional contrasts in differential rates of growth carry in their train economic and political and social consequences which the student of social and cultural phenomena may not ignore."7 Purpose and Scope This is a study of the change of population in Central South- Mamprusi, Northern Ghana. The study focuses on the changing patterns of population growth, especially in the 20th Century. An attempt is made to account for the factors which affect population change (growth or decline) in South-Mamprusi. In this way, the author gives an account of differential growth rates in the various Census Enumeration Areas which constitute the study area. In the analysis, the study will try to answer the following questions: 1. What are the major components which are responsible for population change? 2. Which are the areas with high population growth rates and why? 7Trewartha, Glen T., "A Case for Population Geography," Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 43, No. 2, 1953, pp. 71-790 5 3. Which are the areas with declining population change rates and why? 4. What is the role of the traditional system of authority in population change? 5. What relationship exists between population changes in the various enumeration areas and the major economic activities carried out by the people? 6. What have been the conditions in population change during the post-1960 population census period? The StudypArea Central South-Mamprusi has an area of 1,692 square miles and is 56 per cent of the whole of South-Mamprusi, which has an area of 2,996 square miles (Figure 1). Central South-Maprusi lies approximately between 100 North and 100 40' North. Its boundaries are clearly defined by the White Volta-River Morago, River Nasia and the former Anglo-German boundary. For the most part, the area lies between 400 ft. and 1,000 ft. above sea level, but rises to about 1,500 ft. in the eastern part of the area. Indeed, it is the dip slope of the Gambaga escarpment (Figures 2 and 3). Apart from a small area around Kpasenkpe, which overlies granite, the whole district lies on the Voltaian geological systems consisting of sandstones and shales. Light sandy soils are common and there are some silts and clay in the valleys. The climate is Sudanese-type with a pronounced dry season, i.e., when there are In) rains, during the period from November to March and a wet season which begins in March-April, and continues to October with a peak in August-September. In the dry season,from November to February, the "Harmattan" - a dry desiccating wind - blows more or less continuously from the north-east. The mean annual rainfall for the area is 45 inches. The natural vegetation is tree-savannah i.e., with.ta11 grass and rather 6 LOCATION CENTRAL SOUTH “MAMPRUSI (SHADE?) Ho). -- AAZO “'1 . —-.M~ |° o T I T Inwku I " U P p E R oBol~oton~t _ % R E G l O N | 0W0 ——IO° "J V ’TT- T3 ’ > .— g R O 9.__ Damongo —‘9° .- / ”T \~ _ s°— F80 a R o N A H A F o ‘ \ (9 4 r~ ’ Sonyani 0 \\“"’ €429. \_\ \ c: 1 I ’ 79 'fi—- ’a- It 55 '4 4A TD" I ‘1 -—‘7° \\ I/ .Kumasi I ( / 3.40 19— \‘Ir [EASTERN ' J l R s c I o N,’ 0 6‘ 7x J ‘5‘ x \ -—1 be ~50 1 1 1 {azurer 3° 2° l° 0° |° Figure l .H .m .woma .commA «wmsumwmzlnusom Hmuusuo mo >nmmwmomu Hmuwuoumwm a< .m snow .maflnmz umuw< N shaman 2.0 . bro I 9.0 N/ ._ 890. , . l JOOoo. poo. .90... :20 5v . .30. 3.0! :93 In 690. .20.. 39.0 2N woo. 3.0! so? 2. .90 9.0 9.0 ._ mOuom vamfim m.uo:u:< cum momsou coma 0:050 "muuoom m ousmfim >.’h’* ‘—.“ ’h.‘." 'I'-‘ I’Cc.u o..P I P .a:! 5“ MW m. m “w i shoaso son a. / .5010! 03:3; / >u>l3n 6:: 000- u..03h3¢ 02‘ nanZnU 60.— 5° «n.8(0230- 34 coefficients (R) which measure the estimated and observed value for Y by the individual independent variables. In this way the research is in a position to show the kind of relationship existing within the frame- work of an established hypothesis or hypotheses i.e., the relationship X between Y and X X etc. respectively. 1’ 2’ 3 It is usually assumed that a correlation which is greater than :_0.50 is significant and anything greater than :_0.70 is considered to be high. However, this depends on the sample size. These limits are arbitrary, and merely provide a convenient guide to making use of the coefficients as descriptive statistics. In general terms coefficients between -0.50 and -1.00 (perfect negative relationship) and between +0.50 and +1.00 (perfect positive) are fairly significant; while of the values lying between -0.50 and +0.50, little significant correlation is to be expected. If a value of zero is obtained, this indicates that the two sets of data fluctuate completely independently of each other and no correlation exists at all. In measuring up the relationship between the independent variables and population change, the object is to explain why some enumeration areas had higher population growth rates than others between 1948 and 1960. An advantage of the regression model is that apart from indicating the type of relationship existing between the dependent and independent variables it can help the research know how much of the variance in the problem being studied (in this case population change) through the use of the multiple coefficient of determination (R2) has been explained, and how much remains unexplained. The multiple regression model is often expressed algebraically as: Y = a-i-b1 Xl-i-b2 X2 + b3X3 + b4X4 etc. 35 where Y is the dependent variable (population change) X1 " independent variable No. 1 X2 " " " NO. 2 X3 " " " No. 3 X4 " " " No. 4 a and b1, b2 etc. are constants. 4. Residuals from the Regression Model: The kinds of measures of associations given above are only summary values: they apply to the entire area under study and they cannot be used for mapping internal variation of the degree of association. Their role is merely to describe the degree of spatial correspondence among the areal variations of the variables as measures of the validity of‘ the hypotheses for the area as a whole. The multiple regression model has an additional advantage of providing residuals. A residual from regression for a particular observation is the difference in magnitude between the observed value whose numerical value is determined by factors included and omitted from the investigation, and an estimated value, determined only by variables included in the study.5 In this study a residual will be that part of the magnitude which population change reaches in an enumeration area which is independent of the areal association between population change and other independent variables considered. The map has been described as the fundamental instrument of geographic research.6 It is possible to map residuals in an attempt to answer the 5Thomas, Edwin H., Maps of Residuals from Regression in Brian, J. L. Berry and Duane F. Marble (eds). Spatial Analysis A Reader In Statisitcal Geography. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1968, p. 330. 6James, P. E. and C. F. Jones, American Geography: Inventoryyand Prospect, Syracuse University Press, 1954, p. 9. 36 following questions: 1. Where are the large residuals found? 2. Where are the areas in which the regression equation performs with reasonable accuracy? 3. Is there any recognizable pattern in the distribution of the residuals that might suggest the effect of other possibly unknown variables? (Hopefully, the locational arrangement of the residual values will suggest other variables which might be important in accounting for the remaining variation in the dependent variable, i.e., the formulation of new hypotheses.) Residuals have either a negative sign (in cases where the equation over-estimates the value of Y) or a positive sign (in cases where the equiation underestimates the value of Y). Thus a residual map will show areas of over-estimation and areas of under—estimation and thereby depict graphically the spatial variations in the performance of the equation in accounting for differential population change. CHAPTER IV POPULATION GROWTH 1900-1948 A. Peopling of the Area For a better understanding of the pattern in population change, both at the aggregative and the distributive levels it has been considered necessary to devote this section to giving an annount of the peopling of the area before the turn of this century. The greatest event to take place in the area was the peopling of it by groups of people from different cultural reas. This factor of differential cultural background has through- out the years affected many aspects of the human geography of Central South- Mamprusi. The area forms part of the Voltaic family and linquistically belongs to the Mole-Dagbani association which covers a major part of Northern Ghana and Upper Volta. It is known to have been settled for a very long time perhaps before the neolithic period. The social organization of the people was the same and leadership was vested in the divine representatives of the Earth God (Tendana)*. Oral tradition does not help in telling us how populous the region was but it can be inferred from the widespread notion of the "tendana" that there was no vast areas unoccupied by man. Descendants of these original people in South-Mamprusi are called "Dagbansabilisi."* Upon these autochthonus people migrated small bands of people from further north who were better armed, familiar with the idea of territorial acquisition, and, in some cases, familiar with the rudiments of Mohammedianism. 37 38 The first group of 'invaders' to arrive were the Moshi-Dagomba who claim to have migrated from Zanfara.1 The exact date of the arrival of this group who later established the Moshi-Dagomba group of states comprising Moshi, Mamprusi, Dagomba and Nanumba, has not yet been fixed, but many suggestions have been made. It is most likely that they arrived in the 15th century.2 According to oral tradition the leader of this group of migrants from the North was Gbewa who after settling in Pusiga near Bawku encouraged the movement of more men from further North. Due to succession disputes after the death of Gbewa, Tohogu one of his sons, moved with.some of his followers including Gruma to Mamprugu3 which later gave the group its name. Gambaga was later on established as the traditional headquarters of the Mamprusi. There is no evidence that the invaders received any serious opposition from the original people apart from the Komkomba who opposed them and that explains why there are no real Mamprusi in Komkomba. Mercenaires and merchants have played a major role in the peopling of the area. The oral tradition of the area has it that the first group of mercenary-immigrants were some Mande-Dyulas who were invited by the lThe Mamprusi, Moshi and Dagomba all claim to have come originally from Zanfara, one of the Hausa Bakoi States. Tribal marks of the Zanfara people who remained behind are similar to Mamprusi, Moshi and Dagomba tribal marks. The Moshi-Dagomba group recognize the Zanfara people as their "abokin wasa" (Hausa) meaning play mates. 2Nabila, John S., An Historical Geography of Central South-Mamprusi. B.A. thesis submitted to the University of Ghana, Legon, March, 1968. Mamprugu, now in ruins, was a village east of present Bunkprugu i.e. North East of Nalerigu. The 1901 Census Report shows that it had only 78 people. Mamprugu refers also to the Kingdom. (See the Glossary) 39 10th ruler of the Mamprusi Kingdom, Na Zibrim, in order to strengthen his power. They were horsemen armed with spears and today their decendants are to found in the royal towns of Nalerigu and Gambaga where they still play the role of Spear bearers to the chiefs. Na Atabia (1692-1752) went to Kong in the Ivory Coast by way of Walewale, Daboya, Bole and Mango-Taro; and returned with a number of mercenaries in 1751. These later on settled at a place they named Sansane- Mango but some of them remained in Central South-Mamprusi and gave birth to the Kanbonsi warriors of the chiefs. Their decendants are the chakosi who speak a tongue understood by the Akans in the South. The Tampolensi are Sisalas who arrived in Central South4Mamprusi in the 1750's. Being mainly farmers they chose a fertile section north- east of Walewale and established their own villages -- (1) Langbinsi, (2) Singbini, (3) Ka-sape, (4) Boyene, (5) Zangua, (6) Nabilboka, (7) Tang- bini, (8) Pinaba, and (9) Boku. (Figure 7) The Mande merchants are known to have operated in the Gold Coast for a long time, for the Portuguese met them at the coast in the 15th Century. Their kinsmen, the spear bearers, invited them into Central South- Mamprusi and they founded the following settlements: Nabari, Bulbia, Guabuliga, Mushio and Zangu. A few of them settled in already existing villages and built their own sections (Zongo), such as those in Gambaga, Nalerigu and Wungu. The Jihad of Uthman Dan Fodio coupled with the‘WarS 0f the Fulani against the Hausa in Northern Nigeria in the early part of the 19th Century forced many Hausa to migrate Southwards. Some of them settled in Central South-Mamprusi and Binger saw them in Walewale and Gambaga.4 4Binger, L. G., Du Niger au Golf de Guinee, Vol. 2, Paris, 1892, p. 37. 40 .HH .a .mpma ..uau .mo ..m snow .maapmz pmuu< n whoafim 0.1.: m. I M mI. . _ m A 1.11,“ . . =5. ‘50» .1--- i . 77,131.03 Q .uclotohltfvoiauuo 3.2 III... . .32 :10 2» 0.. .. $8.8 £O~ c.3233 .todlré Ill-l .Bocanzuln o...8€.8flilgngzun _ Il....::l.o..8.u= .. .. 009.133.1108...» _ >ux .000 .90 u . n _ l \ \ u I. _ \ . .. N \v... _ \ —\§§ —Il .\. x .. 23% . . a a Q I I IIII . I r ILI . . IIIIAflo l \ .1 \ a \ . ’1 ‘ s a _ \ I I I ‘ OhgtlUW " ...q\\ Ohio \ - . \ X \ I a I 53.03» \ s \\ $3. Jygfid 0.. . . AI. II |||||||||| car H. w III II, 0... a at . .i If . \\ . a ’4 I .P‘ \\ o4 .......... . fl \“ ~\\ ’ ax . I .o I ....... . . .X. _. x 3.5). 7.2225: - .,,., . . 2.23 1 .. .. \I .. . I. . 3.3.05 - \ \\ 1‘ — ll \\ \ 'I. g u. s\\ \‘ III .1... II \ \ \ \ A a. h. “ .mu;. 4 . ,, fl ,4.- _ m . 1-..: . I.-. i a / 2.1.35: . :93; R. I: as...» A]; \\ teal. w V .i/ .x/uuuu I ugh—mad. . I ’1 I \l A 90cc! all: ‘ \\. / x I. I K I\\. \s I a a 1 I\\ r . .5.» o 333; a //z I” . z ‘5 /.. I; K .. IIIII III III I I no r OER . ‘ , x X 30:20 N I I I ’ . can ’. 4; aJJSN O'OJQOW ”‘31.“? l I I 52" a . I ~ ‘ I . r r .. x K“-.- ..\ . .I _:s oval-aha I t. \ Ill I \ \‘ g .\ .. uzlaamFII 339dHVII 0'03 . m .o...&- . .. V. .622... . 3x 0'30 _ I a 0.0 . ' fi/ . L 9.0 .I 9.0 - .90 I - I 00.. mFZmeotwm “.0 ZOEDmg—flo OZ< 20:30.3 Azsozm 03. 55; 20.3255 41 Through gradual acquisition of land, either by conquest or settlement, mostly the latter, the Mamprusi Kingdom by the 19th Century extended from present Chakosi in the East to about 1 40' Longitude West. It had common boundaries with Sisala (Tumu) and Moshi in the North; Gonja and Dagomba in the South; and W3 in the West.5 Political status accounted for the growth of the population of certain settlements which became the seats of important chieftaincies. A hierarchy of chieftaincies was developed with Nalerigu as the.seat of the Paramount Chief, and Kpasenkpe, Wungu, Janga and Kurugu6 were divisional headquarters. These became centers of attraction for social, political and religious reasons for the people. (Table 1) Before the turn of the century some Moshi men migrated from Upper Volta in South-Mamprusi, most of whom were cloth dyers and weavers and therefore settled in existing villages with markets such as Walewale, Nalerigu, Gambaga, Langbinsi and Wungu. A few Moshi farmers are also known to have migrated into the area at that time. Thus before 1900 the population was made up of people from different places as shown in the table below. (Table 2) 5Binger, op. cit. In 1888 he said that "Mamprugu controlled Sesanimango and all the Grumshi up to the Red Volta," p. 38. Kurugu was the divisional headquarters of the Talensi and Bolatanga area. The 1931 Census shows a population of 1,427 for the settlement. In 1933 Tongo and Bolgatanga were made separate divisional capitals. As a result Kurugu lost its political function hence its popu- lation reduced considerably. In 1948 for instance, the population was only 70 and in 1960, 55; indeed by then it has completely declined. 42 TABLE 1 HIERARCHY OF TRADITIONAL AUTHORITY Paramount Chief (Nayiri or Mamprugunaba) Resident at Nalerigu Divisional Chiefs I Wungu Kpasbnkpe Jahga Kurbgu (No longer a di- y vision headquarters after 1933) Sub-chiefs or Village Chiefs I I Tendana and sectional leaders of Village B. Population Growth 1900-1948 Between 1887 and 1901, the British, Germans and French engaged in political manoeuvre in Northern Ghana. On 24th December 1896, the British flag was hoisted in Gambaga and in 1901 the Northern Territories Protectorate was created directly under the British Crown with Gambaga as headquarters -- Gamabaga lost this position to Tamale in 1907.7 With the establishment of 'Pax Britannica' the Slave trading ac- tivities of Samori and Bakatu in Northern Ghana ceased. In like manner 7Metcalfe, G. E., Great Britain and Ghana, Documents of Ghana History 1806-1957, Thomas Nelson 1964, pp. 452—468 and 487-508. 43 TABLE 2 COMPOSITION OF POPULATION BY END OF 19th CENTURY - A RECAPITULATION a, Group Remarks l. Autochthonus pe0p1e The indigenous people and main stock of population today. 2. Those of Mande Origin These included Traouri, Diabakhate and Kamara. Some of them formed the chieftaincy group while others were either merchants or spear bearers. 3. Hausa Immigrants Came to area after the Wars of Uthman Dan Fodio. 4. Chakosi The Warrior group. 5. Tampolensi Settled in North-east of Walewale. 6. Moshi Immigrants Settled in area as traders and farmers. intervillage or inter-stage conflicts were stopped and all these gave an impetus to free movement of people. Indeed there was a redistribution of population in many parts of the North and adjoining Upper Volta. 1. Population Growth 1900—1921: The methods used for counting people in the 1901, 1911 and 1921 censuses were very inaccurate, owing particularly to lack of qualified personnel. As a result many villages were not enumerated and even in villages where counting took place the response from the people was poor. Even with the 1948 Census which was better organized than the previous 44 ones, the Chief Census Officer suggested that there was about 10% under- estimation of that particular census.8 Even though one cannot rely wholly on these figures they do serve as an approximation and as a guide to what the trend was in population growth between 1900-1921. As the table below shows, there was a steady increase in population. TABLE 3 POPULATION GROWTH 1900-1921 Population Population 1901 1911 Change 1921 Change Male 5,064 7,250 43.2% 10,200 40.7% Female 3,920 6,609 68.6% 9,454 43.0% Total 8,984 13,895 54.3% 19,654 41.8% (After Census Reports) Conditions of population growth during this period are not very clear from the Census Reports. There was a population growth of 54.3 per cent between 1901 and 1911 while there was a change of 41,8 per cent be— tween 1911 and 1921. Though it is difficult to distinguish reproductive change from net migration rate, it was the former which accounted for much of the growth. This was during the early stages of the districts contact with innovations introduced by Europeans and consequently birth rates were quite high, thus conforming to the demographic transition theory. In view of the population increases during the period, though this was a time health 8Gil, B. Z., 1963, op. cit., p. 68 45 conditions were very poor, it can be inferred that the fertility rate might have been much higher than present rates. The family system to a very large extent was based on the extended family system. Commenting on the marriage in Northern Ghana as a whole, the 1911 Census Report has this to say: "All females after they arrive at puberty may be looked upon as married, and males from an early age until they are old take upon themselves as many wives as they can afford."9 Mortality rates were equally high in the society especially within the young and old age group. Infant mortality was very high owing to very poor health conditions and diseases like malaria, convulsions and small pox took many lives from this young age group. Among the adult popu- lation deaths were also common and it is known that the Influenza Epidemic of 1918 raised the mortality rate especially within the age group 16 to 30 years. Cerebro Spinal Menengitis also caused many deaths especially among females and the 1921 Census Report attributes the high sex ratio to the deaths of many females as a result of this disease.10 The living conditions at the time made many diseases endemic as well as highly epidemic in a few places. There was a general desire for many children especially males to help on the farm, to tender livestock and to take part in other activities associated with the subsistence economy. The people were mostly farmers and in many places the wealth and prestige of a family was measured in terms of the number of cattle, the extent of acreage under cultivation, and above all, the size of the family. According to Caldwell, trepical African customs 9Gold Coast (Ghana) Census Report, 1911. 10Gold Coast (Ghana) Census Report, 1921. 46 and religions have always favored high fertility.11 The creation of Gambaga as the first headquarters of the Northern Territories Protectorate enhanced the position of Central South-Mamprusi. Even though this was short-lived, an inertia in terms of attracting migrants into the area was created. When the British first took over the Northern Territories, they found that whatever trade did exist was almost entirely in the hands of the Hausa from Nigeria. The indigenous people were mostly farmers and not interested in trade. More often than not these traders took cattle to Southern Ghana in caravans and on the return trip brought back kola nuts from the forest to the North. This helped markets in a few places, like Walewale, Nabari and Gambaga, to increase in importance and consequently they attracted immigrants. Even Walewale and Gambaga were important centers for the trade traffic before the turn of the century. Commenting on the importantce of Walewale in 1888 Binger said "Walewale :n; a sort of entrepdi for Central Moshi, Sensanimango and North-Mamprusi."12 Thus the creation of Gambaga as the headquarters along with the efforts of the British adminis— tration to encourage trade resulted in the migration of some more Hausa, Moshi and Mande traders into Central South-Mamprusi. The administrative role of Gambaga also brought a few people from Southern Ghana into the area. Table 4 shows the composition of the population of Gambaga by ethnic groups in 1921. This table gives us an idea about the origin of most of the migrants in South-Mamprusi. The density of population of South-Mamprusi was 11 persons per square mile in 1921 (Figure 8). As this map shows there llCaldwell, C., op. cit., 1967, pp. 39-40. 12Binger, L. G., op. cit., p. 52. II. U 4 4 4 0-1 >1 D<> ”to: I"'I b 4* >04 t1 4 'r> r4} V > H>y4 I1 TY oven :00 p. 38-5931“ 100 -200 ’ FPP ATIN—Il. 4 as -so pc_n so MILE IO’ZS SO - I00 O‘lO After Hilton, T. E.; Figure 8 Ghana Population Atlas. Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd. London. k960, p. 12. ETHNIC COMPOSITION OF POPULATION IN GAMBAGA, 1921 48 TABLE 4 Ethnic Group Male Female Total Mamprusi 375 438 813 Dagomba 7 15 22 Frafra 10 6 16 Grunshi 79 73 152 Builsa 6 8 14 Konkomba 5 29 34 Ashanti 9 0 9 Fante 12 3 15 Kusasi 3 4 7 Krobo 1 0 l Kwitta 1 0 l Dagarti 1 0 l Bazaberimi 2 4 6 Hausa 64 86 150 Fulani 7 0 7 Lobi l 0 1 Kotokoli l 0 1 Yoruba 7 7 14 Moshis 32 28 60 Wangara 1 l 2 Total 617 702 l 319 3 (After 1921 Census Report) was relatively a dense population in NorthrMamprusi. The fact of South-Mamprusi being adjacent to a populous region was one of the causes for the migration of some Grunshi, Frafra, Builsa, Kusasi and Busansi into SouthrMamprusi. Besides this, there was the fact that South and NortheMamprusi formed one Administrative Unit - the North Eastern Province — and the British officers encouraged people from these areas to migrate into South—Mamprusi where land was abundant. Even as late as 1950 John R. Raeburn estimated that in South-Mamprusi "only about 49 8 per cent of the total surface is cropped in any one year."13 Even though this was the policy of the administrators only a few did move because of the high attachment of farmers to their "fathers' land". By 1920 there were already Yoruba from Nigeria in the area and were definitely engaged in commercial activities. In Gambaga for instance there were 14 Yoruba in 1921. (Table 4) The above has been a consideration of conditions from 1901 to 1921 and the rest of this section will be devoted to analyzing conditions of population growth from 1921 to 1948. It is hoped that the above analysis will serve as the basis for the understanding of conditions in the rela- tively contemporary period. 2. Population Change Between 1921 and 1948 This period is of paramount importance in the analysis of the human geography of Northern Ghana as a whole and, indeed, in many other parts of Ghana. Education was well established in the country and South- Mamprusi boasted of a major Primary Boarding School in Gambaga (opened in 1912) and Primary Day Schools in Kpasenkpe, Janga and Wungu (all were opened in 1947; the author was one of the pioneer students of the Kpasenkpe School). Health conditions were improving with the building of dispensaries in Gambaga, Walewale, Janga, Kpasenkpe and Wungu to cater for the schools as well as the local population. There existed roads which served as 14 arteries for the important settlements, and there was even a proposal 3Raeburn, John R., Report on a Preliminary Economic Survey of the Northern Territories of the Gold Coast, Colonial office, 1950, p. 18. 14Nabila, John S., op. cit., pp. 41-42. 50 to build a railway line to the North.15 With the existence of motor transport, movements became very common and this was an impetus for the attraction of more migrants into sparsely populated South-Mamprusi. Of more importance still during the period was the Spatial relationships of South-Mamprusi, firstly with other parts of Northern Ghana and secondly with Southern Ghana. Whereas it gained immigrants from the former, it lost quite a few young men who migrated to the latter to seek employment. 0n the whole, living conditions were improving at quite a satisfactory rate.16 All these developments during the period under consideration had far reaching repercussions on population growth. Between 1921 and 1931 there was a population change of 55.3 per cent while a change of 34 per cent took place between 1931 and 1948. Both Caldwell17 and Gaisie18 have indicated that birth rates have been very high throughout the regions of Ghana for a very long time now. They have suggested that fertility rates in Ghana have not changed very much from what they were years ago. From this generalization, it is assumed for this study that fertility rates in the various sub-divisions of Mamprusi by 1948 were almost the same as they were between 1911 and 1921. The inadequacy of the Census Reports has made it difficult for any definite calculations on fertility to be worked out. According to Caldwell, given reasonably 5Sessional Papers XXIV, Papers Relating to the Construction of a Railway to the North from Kumasi, 1928-1929. The plan initiated by Governor Guggisburg was scrapped by his successor because of the uncertainty that the line could be Operated at a profit. 16Census Reports - 1931 and 1948 and Report on the Northern Territories of the Gold Coast, 1937, Colonial Office, London (1937). 17Caldwell, John C., op. cit., 1967, p. 24. l8Gaisie, S. K., op. cit., p. 39. 51 TABLE 5 POPULATION GROWTH 1921-1948 Per Cent Per Cent Population Population 1921 1931 Change Change Male 10,200 16,520 +62.0% 21,877 +32% Female 9,454 14,003 48.0 19,104 36 Total 19,654 30,523 55.3 40,981 34 (After Census Reports) good information on the age structure of a population and the distribution of births by age of mother, it is possible to estimate the level of fer- tility. Unfortunately, such information is not available on Central South- Mamprusi for any estimations on fertility to be made. By the 19305 the health conditions of the people had improved. The building of dispensaries coupled with the existence of a relatively satisfactory transport system made it possible for the rural areas to receive medical care from Urban Centers. Though this was a factor that helped in reducing the number of deaths in villages, the period between 1921 and 1939 was a very difficult time for the people because of the occurrence of sleeping sickness. Sleeping sickness, a protozoal disease, is caused by the genus trypanosomiasis. African trypanosomiasis is a specific febrile infection often characterized by weakness, wasting, and a protracted lethargy — a condition which has given the disease its name, sleeping sickness. Unless 52 treated, the disease usually ends fatally.19 The prevalence of the disease depends on three major factors, namely (1) the parasite or trypanosomes (2) the tsetse fly vector to transport the trypanosomes and (3) a host (susceptible human or animal population). Though the disease is known to be endemic in West Africa it was never a serious disease until the 19205 and 308. It is known that the first outbreak of sleeping sickness took place around Ouadougou in Upper Volta but it was restricted to this area until the Colonial period when it spread to other places.20 Lack of movement among the people during the pre-colonial period was a major factor in curtailing the disease. Studies have shown that the appearance of some epidemics followed directly the need among the people for trade, employment or the occupation of new land. By the 1930s Southern Ghana had already become a receiving area of labor migrants from Northern Ghana, Upper Volta and other neighboring countries. The influx of migrants from the North to the South did not only introduce the disease in Ghana but also raised the incidence rate of sleeping sickness. Checks at the Yeji ferry revealed that most of the migrants to Southern Ghana were infected with sleeping sickness.21 As Figure 9 shows, SouthéMamprusi was one of the areas which suffer— ed from sleeping sickness in Ghana. The development of the focus was largely due to the permanent settlement of Moshi in SoutheMamprusi and of 9Strong, Richard, Diagnosis, Prevention and Treatment of Tropical Diseases, New York, 1945, p. 164. 20Morris, R. S., "The Ecology of Epidemic Sleeping Sickness, The Significance of Location." Part I and II Bulletin of Entomological Research, Vol. 43, 1951. 21Scott, David, "The Epidemiology of Sleeping Sickness in Ashanti (in three parts) Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. Vol. 60, 1957. 53 INCIDENCE OF SLEEPING SICKNESS IN GHANA 1919-1939 —_— 4- .—. 3° 1°, WW 1%; H°‘ I l '1... I N .. E R oBOloton } ........ ' . . ..:.:1:: __4 Ni I I N ——|0° ’J E ” 5" ”‘9. § __ \u 5 R a: i - t z _90 9o... Damongo \ I, __ \\ .. Z \.. 80,... 0 ._...8° 8 R o N A H A F o \ 0 \ rs I’4‘-’"_"\\ \\ In _ Sunyani o ‘\“'l 63459, '~\ 4 (I '10—— Ir’ASHATl/ /( __70 ‘b \‘ 9‘ r’ l , .— \ / oKumosi I ( 3H0 19 \\ I l y _ \ f Jl REGION/’EASTERN O I s 7‘ I x s ‘ A > ——1 be .__1 -—:5° ‘1’ 3°“ '6 Foci of sleepifl Sickness L Figure 9 After David Scott; "The Epidemiology of Sleeping Sickness in Ashanti" (in three parts) Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Vol. 60, 1957. 54 course,a favorable environment for the development of the disease; the existence of the Tsetse fly vector and a susceptible human population. what was absent was the parasite, trypanosome which the Moshi immigrants supplied. Since the 16th century the Moshi, Mamprusi, Dagomba and Namumba regarded themselves as sister kingdoms. With the development of free movement of people.coup1ed with the existence of abundant land in South- Mamprusi,tfiuaMoshi felt well accommodated to settle in the area. At times they established their own villages, for example, Sayo, Nagbo, Banawa, Manga and Guabuliga. Indeed, the authors field work has revealed that there are Moshi immigrants in almost all the settlements in Central-South Mamprusi. Records in Gambaga and Tamale reveal that the disease was unknown until many Moshi made the area their home. Though it is difficult to tell the exact number of people who died from this disease, Table 6 clearly shows South-Mamprusi with the highest incidence rate in Ghana as a whole between 1932 and 1939. Through the efforts of the Colonial Adminis- tration the disease was eradicated and today the Rural Health Department, with a head office in Gambaga, has the duty of making sure that the people are free from the disease. Apart from the incidence of Sleeping Sickness during this period, the area faced periods of famine owing to the invasions of locusts. The first invasion took place in 1929—30 and it has been recorded that 545 farms were destroyed by the locusts.22 There was a second invasion of the locusts in 1933/34 and a final one in 1939. During the author's field work, the people gave vivid accounts of the hard times they experienced due to these 2 2District Dailnyiaries, Gambaga Administrative Office, Gambaga. INCIDENCE 0F SLEEPING SICKNESS (Trypanosomiasis) in Ghana 1932-1939 55 TABLE 6 All Kumasi Year Ghana Hospital Sunyani Mamprusi /Tumu 1932/33 685 93 * * * 1933/34 1.179 363 73 250 1 1934/35 1,973 252 96 1,012 150 1935/36 3,885 249 95 1,683 1,161 1936/37 4,820 411 119 2,323 944 1937/38 5,594 306 155 2,148 1,242 1938/39 5,611 258 36 1,415 1,107 1939/40 6,826 * * * * South Mamprusi and Lawra/Tumu were endemic areas with incidence rates of 6% and 3.5% respectively. *Figures unrecorded. After David Scott, "The Epidemiology of Sleeping Sickness in Ashanti," (in three parts) Journal Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Vol. 60, 1957. invasions and, of course, the sleeping sickness epidemic. With the foregoing, it is quite evident that death rates between 1921 and 1948 might have been higher than they were in the previous years. After 1921, immigration mainly accounted for the increase in popu- lation in northeastern and northwestern areas of Northern Ghana. These immigrants who were seeking land for cultivation or were desirous of escaping the stringent political and administrative (tax) systems in their 56 respective countries were mainly from Upper Volta, northern Togo, Mali and the Ivory Coast. About 50 per cent of them settled in north Mamprusi, therefore, by the 19305 there was already a problem of over— p0pu1ation.23 There was a steady influx of immigrants from North-Mamprusi into South-Mamprusi. These immigrants were mainly agricultural settlers. In addition to the immigrants from the north, there were some Fulani who are noted for rearing cattle very well in some West African countries, e.g., Nigeria, Senegal and Guinea. The British administration, at the time also in charge of Nigerian affairs, encouraged the Fulani to migrate to Northern Ghana to help farmers keep their cattle. This, they hoped, would produce better cattle as well as allow Northern Ghanaian farmers to con— centrate on food production. In 1945, the Gold Coast (Ghana) Department of Agriculture held a survey in South—Mamprusi and as a corollary to the survey, four villages were visited where immigrants were interviewed. The results of the interviews, as shown in Table 7, indicate quite clearly the role which inter-regional immigration from North-Mamprusi played in the population growth of the area. Fishing in rivers, streams and ponds has been well established in the area. However, the Mamprusi usually engaged in fishing during only the dry season when the water was low, especially between the months of September and May. Kpasenkpe, Arigu, Janga, Mushio, Bukpere and Nasia have long been associated with fishing, but in none of these areas, was it a serious profession. In 1929-30 some Battor immigrant fishermen from Tongu villages on the lower Volta, where they faced problems of over-population 23Dickson, K. B., op. cit., p. 280. 57 TABLE 7 IMMIGRANTS FROM NORTH—MAMPRUSI AND UPPER VOLTA, 1945 Average No. Yrs. Village Frafra Moshi Grunshi Busanga Total Settled Langbinsi 9 17 20 2 48 12 Sameni 12 l 7 - 20 15 Nayoko 4 9 11 6 30 8 Gbimsi 13 26 25 - 64 10 Total 38 53 63 8 162 — *The number of years settled varied from 2 to 25 but for the most part corresponded nearly to the average figures given above. Grunshi, here, refers to Builsa and Kasena. Moshi and Busanga were mostly from Upper Volta. After Smith, R., Agriculture in South Mamprusi, Agriculture Department (1945), p. 9. and increasing proverty in the home area, arrived. They settled in almost all the fishing villages mentioned above and in one instance they found their own settlement -- Mafanga. Since then, the fishermen continue to immigrate into South-Mamprusi and they carry out fishing on commercial basis along the White Volta. The increasing importance of commercial activities in the district brought more Yoruba, Hausa and quite a few traders from Southern Ghana. Some Dagomba traders and farmers also immigrated to settle in the district. Another source of immigrants was the eastern section of the district where live the Bimoba and Komkomba. A few of these immigrated to some of the settle— 58 TABLE 8 NUMBER OF PEOPLE ENUMERATED FROM NORTHERN TERRITORIES IN THE COLONY AND ASHANTI, 1948 Kusasi 2 Sisala 4 Nankani 1 Dagarti ll Mamprusi 2 Lobi 7 Bimoba 0 Wala 14 Kassena 2 Gonja 3 Builsa 3 Dagomba 7 Konkomba 2 (After 1948 Census Report) ments in eastern Mamprusi for example Gambage, Nalerigu, Sakogu and Langbinsi. Data from the Census Reports for the major ethnic divisions from Northern Ghana but enumerated in Southern Ghana in 1948, gives some in- dication of the long distance mobility of the various groups. Though it is most likely that there was some under-estimation of the actual number of people, the figures do suggest that there was a small movement of labor to the South from Mamprusi. In like manner out- migration from the area to other parts of the North was very insignificant. The only out-movement of any sort to other parts of the North was through a few marriages of Mamprusi women outside the district. CHAPTER V POPULATION CHANGE - 1948-1969 A. Population Change — 1948-1960 The 1948 and 1960 census figures are more reliable than those of earlier periods. In 1960 the total population was 61,372 giving an overall population increase of about 54 per cent, i.e. between 1948 and 1960. This gives an intercensal growth rate of about 3 per cent per year. Table 9 gives the population for the four traditional-administrative divisions. In it, the per cent change in population and population densi- ties for each division has been given as a basis for comparative analysis at the divisional aggregate level. Birth rates continued to be the same while the death rate was reduced very considerably with the opening of a modern hospital at Nalerigu in 1957 by the American Baptist Mission. Immigrants continued to settle in Central South-Mamprusi so that by 1960 almost all the major ethnic groups of Ghana were represented (Table 10). As Figure 10 shows, in 1960, South—Mamprusi was one of the intermediate zones lying between the sparsely populated middle belt and densely populated north—east and north-west. The analysis of population change between 1948 and 1960 is based on the thirty-three population unit areas (Enumeration Areas) which were derived from the Ghana 1960 Census and the author's field research. (Figure 6) 59 6O DENSITY OF POPULATION-NORTHERN GHANA (1960) I A. I 2. 11. E E . 00 mo --- -;-—-—_---~_....._._...J:‘ - - ...:: ..... fiE 11“ — — _ ................ \. __ _ __ ‘. P103; P . . . — — — —(. 101‘ K. J'. J; 7 _ _ _ _! ‘ “Y j__ _ _¢.J (' ' ' ' ' V 1 ._ _ .._'.‘.’.’.‘_1_ . . . . 1 ‘. . — "" _ '— ‘i ./. . . . , _ _ _ _‘ .’. ,' . . -— — —l "'9. k} . . . . -— -— -— - '\ 9°- '\. . . . — — _ _ _ \ 1 \\ 5‘. ‘— --—— —— —— __ J~_’ \ 1 \x. 1"; \‘_ 7-- s — ) ~r‘ I" j \“v’ ‘ _’/ \\_‘ Q!" ’ f' |‘_( 5.: ' K s8° k...) g ‘ 83- L'. ' ' 10 0 10 50 0 1O 25 50 75 100 200 300 MILE S f-‘rom1960 Population Census of Ghana. Figure 10 61 Amuuoamm msmcoo Houwaa «excommmx can mmoww .swcsz osu mo muuwm .muswfim mufimomw mfinu cmuomwwm manmaum>aw w>m£ Aomm.av =wc=3 can Amwc.qv mam3oam3 Mom mouswfim aofiumasmoms om mm Am>finnn=m cowumasaom oosfl msafl mmu< coma 92¢ w¢ma mZOHmH>HQImDm rm ZOHH owcmsu cowmmouwom mo Ho>oq moamoamwcwfim .mom on“: oHomem> Hmfiuumm oumocmum nowumamuuoc HO. MH " HQPGH HOG. : : z = .. : : AMV Gm. h u H0>QH HO. : : : : : .. ANV mc.¢ u Ho>oH no. on» on woomofiwwawfim wow osam> .m Hmowufiuo AHV .mmou< coaumuoascm mm ommo was» as .moowum>uomno mo Hones: onu wH z can aooooum mo ooumoo on» ma m oumnz u u H Assn .a ..uso .ao ..z.m scoumsm Imuu mo mHqu¢z< HA mamde 67 TABLE 12 SUMMARY TABLE FOR THE STEPWISE REGRESSION MODEL (LSADD AND LSDEL) Posi— 2 Increase or tion Variable R R Contribution 1 Traditional Authority .8207* .6736 .6736 2 Urbanization .8628* .7445 .0709 3 Education .9055* .8199 .0754 4 another Locality .9184* .8436 .0237 5 Density .9261* .8577 .0141 6 Foreign Born .9306* .8661 .0084 7 Sex Ratio .9340 .8723 .0062 8 Distance from Roads .9361 .8764 .0041 9 Born in this locality .9389 .8816 .0052 10 Dependency Ratio .9397 .8830 .0014 11 Distance — Urban .9400 .8836 .0006 12 Fertility Ratio .9403 .8841 .0005 13 Born Another Region .9403 .8842 .0001 *Significant at the .05 level. foreign born contributed more toward explaining the total variation than the other variables. As an aid to understanding the individual contributions of the variables both step-wise deletion and addition ("Least Squares Deltion" and "Least Squares Addition") programmes were carried out with the logrithmi- cally transformed data. The results have been combined and shown in Table 12 in order of importance. In Chapter II, it was envisaged that the simple 68 correlation matrix should help in bringing out meaningful demographic patterns in South-Mamprusi. Indeed, there are more higher inter-correlations than those between the independent variables and the dependent variable, and these will be utilized for the analysis. With the foregoing, a con- sideration of the independent variables individually will be given in order of their magnitude in an attempt to account for population change as well as test the hypotheses formulated at the beginning of the study. (a) Traditional Authority; This has a simple correlation coefficient (r) of .82 with population change and is significant at the .001 level. It is the most important variable related to population change. It has an R of .8207 and R2 .6736. Thus, it "explains: by itself 67% of population change, and points to the importance of cultural considerations on popu- lation growth. The hierarchy of traditional authority has already been noted and the role of chieftaincies in attacting local and outside immigrants has also been noted earlier. It was hypothesized that there should be a direct relationship between traditional authority and population change, and the results support this assumption. In considering fertility levels in Ghana as a whole, Caldwell has pointed out that Ashanti has the highest fertility rates because of the traditional system, apparently derived from the former Ashanti Kingdom.5 Both Gaisie and Caldwell attribute the low levels of fertility among the ethnic groups in Northern Ghana to sex imbalance and seasonal and long term migrations which tend to separate couples for short and/or long periods.6 5Caldwell, op. cit., January 1967, p. 222. 61bid., p. 222; Gaisie, S. K., op. cit., 1969, p. 47. 69 (Table 13) Though this is the case at national level, there is evidence to show that the Mamprusi engage in very little long-distance migration. (Table 14) Though there are no sociological, ethnographic and demographic studies on the major Ghanaian ethnic groups, there are some basic considera- tions which the author found during his research within the traditional system to be of relevance to population change. The Mamprusi just as the Dagomba, Nanumba, and Gonja and Wala in Northern Ghana has a centralized political system with rotational succession to political offices. In contrast, the other ethnic groups in the north have long standing of acephalous societies. It has been pointed out in Chapter IV that the "royals" are descendants of immigrant conquerors, while commoners are the autochthones. In Mhmprusi, the royals constitute about one-third of the total population. Socially and economically, the people are differentiated into groups of royals, warriors, Muslims, musicians, craftsmen, and commoners. Fortes noted that these centralized societies have "centralized authority, administrative machinery, and judicial institutions, and in which cleavages in wealth, privileges and status correspond to the distribution of power and authority.7 Status in the traditional society implies, more often than not, the acquisition of many wives and children. On the whole, polygamy is wide- spread in South-Mamprisi, and children are regarded as an economic asset. The perpetuation of the line of descent is of paramount importance to any family. Among the Talensi, Fortes said "there is something wrong by custom 7Fortes, M. and Evans-Pritchard, E. E., African Political Systems, London, Oxford University Press, 1940, p. 7. 70 TABLE 13 GHANA, TOTAL FERTILITY BY ETHNIC GROUP AND URBAN/RURAL Ethnic Group Total Fertility** Urban Rural 1. Akan 6.6 5.5 7.1 2. Asante and Ahafo 7.3 5.5 7.7 3. Fante 6.5 5.3 7.3 4. Nzema 5.2 5.2 5.2 5. Akyem 5.9 6.2 5.7 6. Akauapem 5.2 3.7 5.8 7. Kwahu 7.3 7.2 7.5 8. wasa 5.3 ---* 5.5 9. Boron (including Buda) 7.2 5.8 7.4 10. Ga-Adangbe 5.8 5.5 7.4 11. Ga 5.6 5.7 4.7 12. Adangbe 5.8 4.2 6.1 13. Guan 6.3 5.4 6.9 14. Ewe 6.6 5. 6.8 15. Gurma 5.6 ---* 5.4 16. Konkomba 4.4 ---* 4.7 17. Lobi 6.2 ---* 6.2 18. Grusi 5.0 ---* 5.0 19. Central Togolese 6.4 ---* 5.4 20. Mole-Dagbani 5.3 5.2 5.4 21. Dagomba 4.8 5.0 5.0 22. Mamprusi 6.3 ---* 6.2 23. Dagarti 6.6 7:6 7:2 24. Builsa 5.1 ---* 5.1 25. Frafra 4.0 3.0 4.1 26. Kusasi 5.2 -—-* 4.8 27. Moshi 5.9 6.5 4.9 28. Yoruba 6.1 4.9 6.4 Source: Gaisie, S. K., Dynamics of Population Growth in Ghana, University of Ghana, Legon. 1969, pp. 39 and 43. *Insufficient information for the computation of total fertility rates. **Total fertility is the estimate of the number of children a cohort of 1,000 women would bear if they all went through their reproductive years. 71 TABLE 14 SHORT AND LONG RANGE MOBILITY BY ETHNIC GROUP AND SEX, NORTHERN GHANA: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS Per cent of people Enumerated In Another In Another Locality, Region of Ethnic Group Same Region Ghana Abroad M F M F M F Group A: Centralized States Mamprusi* 12.9 24.7 8.0 3.0 0.3 0.1 Gonja 17.8 22.0 7.3 8.3 0.1 0.1 Dagomba & Nanumba 20.8 31.7 11.5 9.3 0.1 0.1 Wala 12.3 26.5 14.1 10.6 1.0 0.8 Groupr: Acephalous Igpcieties Komkomba 26.0 31.7 12.8 12.4 4.8 4.9 Dagati 11.1 37.3 20.4 8.6 5.5 5.0 Builsa 4.2 29.5 15.8 7.3 0.2 0.1 Grunshi 3.6 43.2 0.5 0.1 0.1 2.2 Frafra 9.0 38.5 26.3 10.8 0.8 2.0 Talensi 4.8 37.3 1.7 0.6 0.1 0.1 Kusasi 7.2 16.0 15.6 6.8 1.3 1.1 Sisala 8.3 47.6 15.0 7.5 9.0 1.6 Kasena 5.6 47.2 2.2 0.9 1.6 7.5 Moshi and Vagala 11.4 20.4 37.7 23.7 19.3 14.8 Lobi 4.7 8.5 2.8 2.1 44.4 40.4 *The figures include the Eastern and Western South-Mamprusi. (Source: 1960 Population Census of Ghana Special Report E., 1964, Accra. Table 4, pp. 25-26. 72 with men and women who never marry, and they are few."8 This is very true of the Mamprusi, especially among the royals who are made up of chiefs and their sons, elders, courtiers, and others associated with authority. These are noted for the possession of very large families. Moslem populations usually depict higher fertility rates than other major religions. Kirk has attributed this to characteristics of Muslim institutions which favor high fertility.9 At the time of their migration into Northern Ghana from further north, the royals already knew some rudiments of Mohammedanism. Since about the 16th century, the centers of chieftaincies and commercial centers have often attracted Muslim immigrants. Since Muslims are an integral part of a Chief's court in Mamprusi, the traditional authority capitals must show a high level of fertility--higher, say, than the villages with or without Muslims. An examination of Table 14 reveals that there are some differences in the mobility of the people between the groups based on traditional authority--centralized and acephalous. The movement of males intra— regionally is significantly greater than that of males in the acephalous societies; the average per cent of males enumerated in a locality other than their natal one is double that of group B societies. The men in the centralized societies migrate more locally than they do outside the region. In contrast, men in group B move very little locally and when they move they do so outside the region (inter-regional migration). 8Fortes, M., The Web of Kinship Among the Tallensi, London, 1949, p. 83. 9Kirk, D., "Factors Affecting Moslem Natality," in Bernard Berelson (ed) Family Planning and ngulation Programs, Chicago, 1966, pp. 561 ff. 73 Regarding female local mobility, census figures show that in every locality more women than men are living in localities of the region other than their birth place. On the whole, in the acepalous societies, lineage and clan exogamy and virilocal marriage are the rule. In contrast, in the centralized states there are no prohibitions about wives to be chosen from distance places. The states are characterized by a complexity of many ethnic groups and do not therefore cater for exagamous socieities. From the above, the role of traditional authority in controlling the movement of people is quite obvious. The hierarchy of chieftaincies do generally generate intra-local migration. The successor to the paramountcy is usually chosen from among the chiefs of the "skin-villages" in Mamprusi. At the lower level, in the traditional system, smaller chieftaincies are stepping-stones to higher political office. Others, like the divisional chiefs of Kpasenkpe, Wungu, and Janga are termini at which.the chief reaches the limit of his ascent in traditional authority.10 Customarily sons cannot reach higher positions in traditional authority than fathers. In pursuit of a higher chieftaincy, an ambitious chief's son goes from office to office of increasing rank until he reaches the limit of his line. The ascent of this ladder of political office often involves frequent movement from village to village over considerable dis- tances. Such a movement does not affect the chief and his immediate family alone, but also many others, including patri- and matri-kin, personal members of the court, clients, specialists like musicians or craft-specialists. Nalerigu, the seat of the paramountcy, is noted for having people from 10The Mamprusi have a saying that "The Prince has no home village," indicating the high incidence of mobility among the royals. 74 more than one-third of the villages in the east. There is a case of Na Wafu of the Mamprusi State who is said to have moved six times, i.e. to six different villages, before becoming the paramount chief in Nalerigu. The traditional political system serves as a check on the migration of people to other regions. With such a system, many men are bound to be involved in the whole set-up. Besides, there is the fact that the system calls for very close kinship ties, such that only a few people can really get away from home for long distances, especially with the purpose of settling there permanently. Perhaps this partially explains why the Mamprusi engage very little in long-distance migration. (b) Urbanization: At the national level, urbanization is unimportant in Central South-Mamprusi. However, within the area itself some settlements like Walewale, Langbinsi, Gambaga, Nalerigu, Wungu, and Sakogu do have quite sizeable populations. It was hypothesized that urban centers are areas of rapid population growth. Urbanization has a simple correlation value of r=.67 with population change thus showing that it is significant at the .001 level for the study. It contributes about 7% of the total variation in the stepdwise regression model. A few studies in Ghana and elsewhere have revealed that there are fertility differentials between the rural and urban populations. Fertility is usually fouhd to be higher among rural residents than among the residents of towns. The rural fertility exceeds the urban fertility by 15% in Ghana.11 From TablejL3,the role of urban centers in reducing fertility among Ghanaian societies is clearly shown. However, the table also reveals the low level llGaisie, S. K., op. cit., 1969, p. 29. 75 of the degree of urbanization in Northern Ghana. Caldwell found that Northern Ghana, Volta Region, and Brong Ahafo are the least urbanized regions in Ghana.12 A further consideration of Table 13 still indicates the absence of this phenomenon in many Local Councils, SouthéMamprusi being one of them. What is happening is that Urbanization is still developing in the few villages mentioned above. As a result, urbanization is rather playing a reverse role here, i.e. instead of reducing fertility, it is raising it. A few of the urban centers are also traditional authority capitals eg. Nalerigu, Wungu, and Gambaga. There is a simple correlation value of r=.55 between Urbanization and traditional authority, and what has been said about the latter is very true of the former in terms of the roles they play in increasing the population. The few urban centers have either medical facilities (a hospital in Nalerigu, a health center in Walewale and dispensaries in the others) or easy access to hospitals outside Mamprusi. This has been a contributory factor towards the lowering of mortality rates, especially infant mortality. On the whole, living conditions in the urban centers are far better than what it is in rural areas and they continue to serve as attractive centers for the local populace or immigrans from other regions. (c) Education: It has been noted that a survey in Ghana revealed that,of the males and females who had never been to school, 27% and 16% respectively migrated at some time to an urban area; but 67% and 61% of those who had high school or university education had done so. This being the case, education should be a significant factor for population growth. Most of the 12Caldwell, "Population Change," op. cit., 1967, p. 132. 76 immigrants from other regions and are engaged in administration, commerce, education (teaching in schools and a college) working in the hospital and the like have all received some sort of education. Urban dwellers have a higher proportion of literates than what exists in rural areas. The variable, number of people with present or past education, has a correlation of .46 (r) with population change and this is significant at the .01 level. A few of the urban centers and traditional authority capitals have schools and educated people, therefore, it is not surprising that there are correlations of .72 and .62 between education and traditional authority respectively, and both correlations are significant. Later age marriages in the urban areas and the use of contraceptives to a greater degree by women in the large towns are some of the factors for urban-rural differentials in fertility in Ghana. The use of contraceptives has been found to be more prevalent among the educated and urban dwellers. The use of contraceptives is not a common phenomenon in SouthéMamprusi. As one of the medical doctors in Nalerigu pointed out, it is even not an accepted practice to the people who see no need for it. The only people who have ever tried or used contraceptives are those who have received an education. Extended formal education is also one reason for postponement of marriage by some women in Ghana. In South-Mamprusi, education has not yet made any marked impact on fertility in terms of reducing it. For instance, the 1960 census shows that only 1% and 2% of the population has past education and present education respectively. (d) Another Locality: Among the migration variables only this one is of any importance. It has already been noted that local mobility is more important than inter—regional migration. Apart from traditional authority 77 as explained from Table 4, being an initiator of local mobility there are other considerations such as a few families in search of new land and migration of families to areas where relatives do live. The extended family system has some measure of "social security" for members of the society, such that it is not uncommon for young men or girls to be sent by parents to relatives to live with them. A relative at any place and facing economic or social hardships can migrate locally to any relative who is likely to provide him with some sort of support. There are weak correlations between the variable born in another locality and the other variables, the highest being with foreign-born (r=.30). A few of the foreigners, especially the Moshi, Busanga, Yoruba, Fulani, and Songhai, engage in step-internal migration. Most of these groups are very mobile in any region or between regions of Ghana. In South-Mamprusi they do indulge in both intra and inter-local migration. What does not stand out clearly and which is difficult to explain is the weak association between the variables traditional authority and per cent born in another locality. An examination of the raw data shows that apart from Nasia, a bridge town which has 58.8 per cent born in another locality, some of the high figures for the variable percent born in another locality are to be found found at the traditional authority capitals--eg. Nalerigu 41.9%, Gambaga 26.2%, Nagbo 34.7%, and Kpasenkpe 33.3%. What might have happened here was the existence of a threshold since both traditional and non-traditional capitals have high figures. This suggests, as mentioned above, that traditional authority alone cannot account for local population mobility. Part of the explanation lies with other factors, such as the building of roads, the search for new land, and the establishment of urban centers. 78 Even though the raw data shows urban centers with high figures for the variable, per cent born in another locality, there is a weak correlation between urbanization and born in another locality. The development of a possible threshold is suggested again, for this result since some rural areas also have high figures. (e) Densityiof Population: It was assumed that there is a close rela- tionship between density of population and growth of population. The rationale behind this assumption was that where the people are many the higher rates of population increase take place there. Even though density of population has a simple correlation coefficient of .72 and is significant at the .001 level, with population change it only explains about 1% of the total variation in the stepwise regression model. As has always been the short—coming of density analysis, the pockets of high population concentra- tions, which in a few cases happen to be the urban centers, might have dis— torted the importanceof this variable. Perhaps its relative unimportant role can be explained by its close association with the other important variables, namely traditional authority, urbanization,Education, with which it has inter—correlations of .64, .79 and .54 respectively-—they are all significant at the .01 level. (f) Foreign Born: This is the last of the most significant variables. Although it explains about 1% of the total variation it has .52 simple correlation with population change. For a long time now there are quite a few foreigners in South-Mamprusi as revealed by Table 10; namely, Yoruba, Moshi, Mande, Songhai, Fulani, Hausa, other Africans and people from out- side Africa. These,of,course have contributed towards population growth 79 in South—Mamprusi, especially if one takes into consideration the long standing relationship between the area and other groups outside Ghana. Most of the foreigners stay in the commercial and traditional authority centers. Hence, between foreign born, and traditional authority and urbanization there are correlation coefficients of .34 and .49 respectively, which are significant at the .05 level. (g) Sex Ratio: This has turned out to be one of the insignificant variables and has a simple correlation r=.23 with population change. This variable was included with the hope that it will serve as an indicator of migration patterns, a component of population change. Sex ratio for the population aged 15-44 years has a maximum value of 176 men per 100 women (Nalerigu) and a minimum value of 99 (Zangu). It has often been argued that since men are more migratory for long distances than women a low sex ratio of the 15-44 years age group is indicative of out—migration and a high one is indicative of in-migration. With.these high sex ratio figures, South Mamprusi is unlikely to fall into any of these categories for as discussed previously little outwmigration is carried out and therefore men stay at home. In like manner, the area has no significant economic attractions for only male immigrants. The only exception is Nalerigu, with the highest sex ratio, which had construction workers putting up the hospital in 1960. The existence of a hospital, in addition to the fact that it is the capital of the paramountcy, encourages young men to migrate to it. The areas with low sex ratios, e.g., Zangu, which had —4% decrease of population between 1948 and 1960 suffered greatly from the sleeping sickness which had a high incidence among men. Other enumeration areas with low sex ratios are Fio, Soo Saboya, Du, Nabari, and Buzulungu, the 80 uuoamm msmaoc coma msmzc “oopsom NH magmas '1 ll 223.551 .5 33:5 ' “C‘ m‘ - .- ~*M- ,..~ v. —-—~— “w.- -NmanuNPIoa—mmemmsm .1 -1411“. m. Mm J... I. I c. L. -2 HS 1 L cm... W 1w. mm,” mwcan ma musmam .nciu .nvgu _ _ .090. on} u. . . on“ u. o o 0. OO—ufl_o Au. 0 O 0 ”ca a \\.II o O o VFIII'linl‘ol‘ o o \ . o o . o o s o . o I. 00 O O \‘O o o O o O — . o o o Ira—00 O I 00. O O o O \‘ O o o o m 0 O . O o o o 0 o o 000 0 o o 00 o I . do; . ,2... .. .o o o o o . 3m. _ _ _ _ .900 .0m00 .nvoo .00 o— mxoam2>an aaa «a enamam .926 .930 .090. _ o8.— u. _ o? n 0 8. u . . w 2.0. I l huncnzfill Coo. _ _ a _ .900 .0n00 .nV00 .000. monmH>Hn Amue lusm Na umoa um o: moo a umsz amuaumz waoa How mnm\o£ owmaaa> Iauua3 ooauumz ow< xom uwuam amoammnm Annmac umoawamc you no .oz mo Hoaso oaon coaooooom condom .oz twosomv mamz Aoaooomooo soc no.2moa mosaozzoaammoo no Naflmem< ooum mxumamm mo whom soumonc ucoom oommooon muonz \omaa comma so «mono «mao on cam muonB echo on oao zoos xom mm< mamz AoaO£mwnom hm mhmww N umma mnumwa mo .ozv NHHAuouaa onuooz nuuam annoy z Amvumow Na lam mo ow< ou case no owouo>¢ Na unma aaaum mamaom soaumonooo coaumosom Icoaumaom Amvoamz Susan nouoaaeb mo osmz awaAaHmmm no zmcm mmmHozoneomoo U xaozmmm< BIBLIOGRAPHY Barclay, G. Techniques of Population Analysis. London and New York, 1958. Berry, Brian J. L. and Duane F. Marble Spatial Analysis: A Reader in Statistical Geography. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1968. Blalock, Hubert M. Social Statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1960. Binger, L. G. Du Niger au Golf de Guinee. Vol. 2, Paris, 1892. Boateng, E. A. A Geography of Ghana. Cambridge, 1966. Bogue, Donald J. Principles of Demography. John Wiley and Sons, 1969. . and James Palmore "Some Empirical and Analytical Relations Among Demographic Fertility Measures with Regression Models for Fertility Estimation," Demography, Vol. 1, 1964. . and Dorothy L. Harris Comparative Population and Urban Research Via Multiple Regression and Covariance Analysis. Scripps Foundation, 1954. Busia, K. A. "Some Aspects of the Relation of Social Conditions to Human Fertility in the Gold Coast," in Lorimer, Culture and Human Fertility, Paris, 1954. Caldwell, J. C. "Population Change" in Walter Birmingham, 1. Neustadt and E. N. Omaboe (eds.) A Study ovaontemporary Ghana, Vol. II. Some Aspects of Social Structure. London, 1967. . "Fertility Differentials as Evidence of Incipient Fertility Decline in a Developing Country — The Case of Ghana," Population Studies. Vol. XXI, No. 1, July, 1957. . Fertility Attitudes in Three Economically Contrasting Rural Regions of Ghana," Economic Development and Cultural Chang_. Vol. XV, pp. 217-38. . African Rural-Urban Migration: The Movements to Ghana's Towns. Canberra, 1969. Clarke, John 1. Population Geography, Pergamon Press, London, 1965. 116 117 Coale, Ansley J. "How a Population Ages or Grows Younger," in Ronald Freedman, (ed.) Populatiop: The Vital Revolutipn, New York: Doubleday and Co., Inc., 1964. Coontz, S. E. Population Theories and Their Economic Interpretation. 1957. Demko, George J., Harold M. Rose and George A. Schnell. Papulation Geo- graphy: A Reader. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1970. Dickson, K. B. A Historical Gepgraphy of Ghana. Cambridge, 1969. District Diaries, Gambaga Administrative Office, Gambaga. Fortes, M. and Evans Pritchard. African Political Systems. Oxford Univer- sity Press, London, 1940, p. 7. Fortes, M. The Web of Kinship Among the Tallensi. London, 1949, p. 83. Forde, Enid R. The Population of Ghana: A Study of the Spatial Relation- ships of its Socio-Cultural and Economic Characteristics Studies in Geography No.15. Northewestern University Press, Evanston, Illinois, 1968. - Gaisie, S. K. Dynamics of Population Growth.in Ghana. Legon, 1969. Grabill, Wilson H. and Lee Jay Cho. "Methodology for the Measurement of Current Fertility from Population Data on Young Children," Demography. Vol. II, 1965, pp. 50—68. ' Hagget, Peter. Locational Analysis in Human Gepgraphy. St. Martin's Press, New York, 1966. Hilton, T. E. Population Atlas of Ghana. Legon, 1960. Hunter, John M. "Regional Patterns of Population Growth in Ghana 1948- 60," Essays in Geography for Austin Miller. J. B. Whittow and P. D. Wood (eds), 1965, pp. 272-90. Johoda, Gustew. "The Social Background of a West African Student Popula— tion I and II," British Journal of Sociology. Vol. V, pp. 355-69; V010 V1, ppo 71-9, 19540 King, Leslie J. Statistical Analysis in Geography. Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey, 1969. Kirk, D. "Factors Affecting Moslem Natality," in Bernard Berelson (ed.), Family Planning and Population Programs. Chicago, 1966, pp. 561ff. Kuczynski. The Measurement of Pppulation Growth. New York, 1936. Lee, Everett S. "A Theory of Migration," Demography. Vol. 3, 1966, pp. 47-57. 118 Malthus, Thomas. Essays on the Principle of Population. London, 1789. Metcalfe, G. E. Great Britain and Ghana: Documents of Ghana History 1806—1957. Thomas Nelson (ed.), 1964, pp. 452—468; 487-508. Monkhouse, F. J. and H. R. Willanson. Maps and Diagrams. University Paper Backs, London, 1951, p. 260. Morris, R. S. "The Ecology of Epidemic Sleeping Sickness: The Signifi- cance of Location," Bulletin of Entomological Research, Part I and 11, Vol. 43, 1951. Musham, H. V. "Fertility of Polygamous Marriages," Population Studies, Vol. 10, Part I, July, 1956, pp. 3-16. Nabila, John S. An Historical Geography of Central South-Mamprusi. Thesesis presented to University of Ghana, Legon, for the B.A. Degree. Omari, T. Peter. "Changing Attitudes of Students in West African Society Towards Marriage and Family Relationships," British Journal of Sociology, Vol. XI, pp. 1970210, 1960. Pool, D. I. The Ghana Fertility Survey. Paper presented to the first African Population Conference, Ibadan, Jan., 1966. Ravenstein, E. G. "The Laws of Migration," Journal of the Royal Statis- tical Society, Vol. 48, 1885, pp. 167—235; Vol. 52, 1889, pp. 241-305. Raeburn, John R. Report on a Preliminaty Economic Survey of the Northern Territories of the Gold Coast. Colonial Office, 1950, p. 18. Ryder, Norman B. "Fertility," in Philip M. Hansen and O. D. Duncan (eds.) The Study of Population: An Inventory and Appraisal. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1959. Report on the Northern Territories of the Gold Coast. Colonial Office, London, 1937. Sessional Papers XXIV, Ropers Relating to the Construction of the Railway to the North from Kumasi, 1928-1929. Colonial Office. Scott, David. "The Epidemiology of Sleeping Sickness in Ashanti," (in three parts) Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. Vol. 60, 1957. Smith, R. T. Agriculture in South—Mamprusi. Agriculture Department, 1945. Smillie, K. W. An Introduction to Regression and Correlation. The Ryerson Press, Toronto, 1966. Spengler, Joseph J. and Otis Dudley Duncan, (eds.). Population Theory and Policy. The Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois, 1956. 119 Strong, Richard. Diagnosis, Prevention and Treatment of Tropical Diseases. New York, 1945, p. 164. Thomas, Edwin H. "Areal Associations Between Population Growth and Selected Factors in the Chicago Urbanized Area," Economic Geogpaphy, Vol. 36, 1960, pp. 158-1970. Trewartha, Glen T., "A Case for Population Geography," Annals of the Association of American Geoggaphers, Vol. 43, No. 2, 1953, pp. 71-79. "A Geography of Population Characteristics," in Geography of Population. Paul F. Griffin (ed.), Fedron Publisher 1970, pp. 39-640 Wrong, Dennis. Population and Society. New York, Random House, 1962. Zelinsky, Wilbur. A Bibliographic Guide to Population Geogpaphy. Depart- ment of Geography Research Paper No. 80. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, 1962. "mummy"!!! mum 111qu "W ITIHITII ES 2408