EFFECT OF SIZE AREA OPEN. TO COLONIZATION 0N. SPECIES COMPOSITION III EARLY OLD-FIELD SUCCESSION ' Thesis for the Degree of M. S. MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY ROGER M. DAVIS 1968 an-.u..;stsw.;q.;¢.\ 0.. “nu-X - ‘ ”xi a ..‘- I .9 1 I‘ Lis‘ ;'1$~1 IIIIIIILIIIIIIIIIIIII * BINDING BY ' IIIIAB & SDIIS' ~ BOOK BINDERY INC. LIBRARY BINDERS WU E53 I V" W WFé" 9% (193169361 A :‘f “th . .' Wm -AML." . I [i \ I ABSTRACT EFFECT OF SIZE AREA OPEN TO COLONIZATION ON SPECIES COMPOSITION IN EARLY OLD-FIELD SUCCESSION {5 by Roger Mlfigavis This study deals with the effect of size of an area open to colonization in early old—field succession in south- western Michigan. The prime questions of the study are what effect does Opening size (or size of the area available for colonization) have in determining the Species present in the Openings and how does the existing undisturbed vegeta- tion affect future stages in the succession? The study was carried out in a newly abandoned field on the Gull Lake Biological Laboratory property in Kalamazoo County, Michigan. The field had been planted to corn in 1964 and abandoned after the fall harvest. In June 1965 Openings ranging in size from .Olmz-lOOm2 were dug or plowedt into the existing undisturbed fallow vegetation. The open- ings were then sampled in August 1965, June and August 1966, and June 1967. Per cent cover values by species for each 1 Roger M. Davis opening were obtained. In addition 0.5m x 2m quadrats of the undisturbed fallow vegetation were sampled in the same manner. The course of succession was found to be slightly different in the Openings as compared with the undisturbed vegetation. Smaller openings were more like the undis- turbed vegetation than the larger Openings in the first year, but this difference gradually declined in succeeding seasons. The per cent cover of 14 of the 77 species found appeared to be correlated with the size of the opening. The most striking effect was noted in Amaranthus retro- flexus which was significantly positively correlated with increasing opening size. The size of Amaranthus plants also showed an increase with increasing opening size. The majority of the 14 species showing correlations with open- ing size were positively correlated with increasing opening size though several negative correlations occurred. These studies suggest that opening sizes smaller than 100 cm2 would be best for examining various mechanisms Operating in producing the organization that develOps with the successional process. Roger M. Davis For the range of sizes used, evidence indicates that the Opening does not affect the later pattern of suc- cession by altering Species composition, nor does it seem that the initial dominant annuals have a determining in- fluence on the later pattern of succession, at least for the dominants found here. EFFECT OF SIZE AREA OPEN TO COLONIZATION ON SPECIES COMPOSITION IN EARLY OLD-FIELD SUCCESSION BY .I .Lyxa‘b' Roger MJ Davis A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Botany and Plant Pathology 1968 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank my major professor, Dr. John E. Cantlon, for his generous aid and supervision in both my scholastic and research program. I wish to thank the other members of my committee, namely Dr. John Beaman and Dr. Clifford Pollard, for their critical review of this manuscript. I am grateful to Dr. George Lauf, Director of the W. K. Kellogg Gull Lake Biological Station, and Mr. Harold Webster, farm manager, for providing the area for this study and for their aid in the actual mechanics of the study. I wish to thank my colleague Mr. Buford Holt for his constant aid during this study and also Mrs. Carol Thomas, computor programmer, without whose aid the statis- tical analyses would have been a great burden. This study was supported by funds made available by the National Science Foundation (Grant GB 1220). ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . o . . . . ii LIST OF FIGURES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V LIST OF TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vi Chapter I. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II. LITERATURE REVIEW. . . o . . . . . . . . . . 5 A. General Trends in Succession . . . . . . 5 B. Factors Involved in Succession . . . . . 7 C. Michigan Studies . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 III. DESCRIPTION OF AREA. . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 IV. METHODS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 V. RESULTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 A. Pattern of Succession. . . . . . . . . . 25 B. Opening Size . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 C. Opening Size and Community Composition . 38 D. Effect of Initial Species. . . . . . . . 40 iii Table of Contents-~Continued Chapter Page VI. DISCUSSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 VII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS. . . . . . . . . . . 53 LITERATURE CITED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 APPENDICES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 APPENDIX A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 APPENDIX B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 APPENDIX C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 iv LIST OF FIGURES Page Photograph of study area in July 1965 . . . . l9 Plot map of study area and weed treatments. . 21 Change in average per cent cover of several species with time for undisturbed fallow plots. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Change in average per cent cover of several species with time for undisturbed fallow plots. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 Average per cent cover vs. Opening size for several Species in August 1965 . . . . . . 33 Average per cent cover vs. Opening size for several species in June 1966 . . . . . . . 34 Average per cent cover vs. Opening size for several Species in June 1966 . . . . . . . 35 Average per cent cover vs. Opening Size for several species in August 1966 . . . . . . 36 Average per cent cover VS. opening Size for several Species in June 1967 . . . . . . . 37 LIST OF TABLES Table Page I. List of opening sizes and numbers . . . . . . 23 II. Presence list of species found in study area in 1966 or 1967. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 III. Species appearing in 1965 but not in 1966 or 1967 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 IV. Coefficients of Similarity between vegetation develOping in openings of various Sizes. . 39 vi EFFECT OF SIZE AREA OPEN TO COLONIZATION ON SPECIES COMPOSITION IN EARLY OLD-FIELD SUCCESSION I. INTRODUCTION Succession as described by Margalef (1963) is the process of the community's becoming more precisely adjusted to its environment. Viewed from another perspective, it is the process by which the species of a regional biota colo- nize and hold their niches against their competitors. Sev- eral generation times of the later, long-lived, species populations are necessary to stabilize the system. This process is one of fundamental importance in ecology in par- ticular, and in biology in general. On any particular Site if the biological properties of the ecosystem are disturbed (e.g. by clearing, fire, etc.), the process of succession is represented by the sequence of pOpulations that succes- sively occupy the site before the biological array returns to approximately the predisturbance composition. This tend— ency for complex species arrays to return to a relatively predictable composition is an expression of homeostasis. l Not only does a displaced stable biological array tend to return to its original composition but, large enough sub- samples of the array examined at the same time on the same homogenous Site tend to follow Similar paths at similar rates. The principle of predictable successional sequences is unique to ecology and of fundamental importance to bi- ology. AS such it warrants study. What are the mechanisms involved in the gradual change of terrestrial plant communities from one array of Species to another, for example, the change of an abandoned cornfield from its initial array of the crop plus a few weed Species to the different arrays found one, two, five, or ten years later? Change comes about as the result of the successful invasion of new species, the inability of species already present to persist, and changes in the pro— portion of the total universe that each established Species pOpulation occupies. Does, and if so how does, the Species array present at a given time influence or to some measure control the order of future arrays? What effect does the initial vegetation in a succession have on determining the future couse of that succession? Knowledge about the es- tablishment and survival of new species is crucial to an- swering these questions. Clements as early as 1916 recognized the importance of bare areas in the process of succession. He states that "Seres originate only in bare areas or in areas in which the original pOpulation is destroyed" (Clements, 1916). Milthorpe (1961) more Specifically states that "establish- ment of plants from seed in vegetation occurs only in 'bare areas' arising from the death of previous occupants or from incomplete coverage." Harper §t_al, (1965) have shown that for many species, germination success is highly sensitive to microsite. Cavers and Harper (1967) have Shown that even for Species whose seeds germinate freely in almost any situation, seedling survivorship is quite microsite—related. Studies carried out by Caruso (1963) suggested the size of an Opening created in an established vegetation had an ef- fect on the survival and reproduction of certain species. He cut holes ranging from 0.5 to 3cm in diameter in old- field grown bluegrass sod transferred to pots in the green- house. Seeds of various plants were then sown in the Open- ings. Caruso found that survival but not germination of Melilotus sp. seeds was significantly positively correlated with the Size of the Opening. Positive correlations with other Species could not be established but indications were that germination of Solidagp canadensis, Aster pilosus, and Monarda fistulosa was affected by the size of the Opening. Thus a number of workers have indicated that the existing vegetation influences the probability of establishment of later immigrating species, and Caruso has shown that the Opening sizes in an existing vegetation can also influence establishment probabilities of later immigrants. The present study was made in an attempt to inves- tigate the effect of Opening size under field conditions using larger openings than Caruso. The prime question of the study then is what effect does Opening size (or the size of the area available for colonization) have on de— termining the species present in the area and does the existing vegetation affect future stages in the succession? II. LITERATURE REVIEW A. General Trends in Succession Succession has long been recognized as a funda- mental process in the history of ecology. As early as 1916 Clements had written a large volume on the subject in which he reviewed earlier work, some of which was written nearly two hundred years ago (Clements 1916). Though recognized as a process fairly early, detailed population studies of particular successions and succes— sion in general are quite recent. At present our under- standing of the successional process is quite limited. Margalef (1963) states a number of axioms which summarize our knowledge of the trends in succession. Some of the axioms are accepted as eXperimentally confirmed while the validity of others remains untested. In succession there seems to be an increase in species having the ability to accumulate and hold biogenetic elements (biological ma- terials and genetic information) and an increase in total standingstock in productivity terms. In addition it seems 5 that the ratio of photosynthetic pigment weight (chloro- phyl) to total weight drops steadily as succession proceeds. There is an increase then a leveling of biological diver- sity. There is an increase in order (predictability). Suc- cession seems to progress toward conservation of maximum biomass with minimum relative energy dissipation and toward increased stability. There is an increase of overall in- formation stored chiefly in a level where its preservation is thermodynamically most efficient, and an increase in ef— ficiency of basic processes. Lastly there is an increase in heterogeneity, and a progress from unorganized to orga- nized heterogeneity. From an evolutionary point of view Woodwell (1965) adds the following nuances to the above trends. Evolution and succession tend to proceed toward the reduction of com— petition; toward the greater utilization of space and other resources. This is associated with increasing variability and greater diversity in form and function resulting in the filling of more niches. Similar environments tend to sup- port organisms which are Similar in form and function if not in species. There is an increase in stability. There is an increase in total photosynthesis and respiration and an increase in total water use. The trends outlined in the preceeding paragraphs, by no means all experimentally confirmed, are the result of fairly recent investigation. Until recently descriptive work on succession has been the predominant type of study of the process. Limnologists and marine biologists have taken the lead in detailed investigations of succession as seen in the studies cited by Margalef (1963). Within the last decade, ecologists concerned with vascular plant have begun to delve,in a more rigorous manner, into the causes or mechanisms Operative in the process of succession. Succession is seen as a directional change in the dominance hierarchy of species present in a given area through time (Whittaker, 1963, Numata and Yamai, 1955). What causes changes in the hierarchy, or more fundamentally, what factors influence the change in a plant's importance in a given area over a given time? B. Factors Involved in Succession There seems to be three major factors affecting the presence of a plant at any particular point in a succession: the availability of propagules; the availability of an occupiable microenvironment; and the effect of other organ- isms. Changes in, and interactions among, these factors produce the particular series of events the aggregate of which we witness as succession. The available propagules represent the basic infor- mation out of which the process of succession molds the changing arrays. These propagules may be visualized as be- ing in two categories: those already present on the Site at the initiation of succession (initial inocculum) and those immigrating to the Site after succession has begun (Egler, 1954). The available propagule factor has been the subject of a fair amount of study. Its Species make-up de- pends on what plants are within seed dispersal distances, the cultivation practices prior to abandonment of land, the last crop, seed content of the soil at abandonment, and the viability of the seeds in the soil. The soil acts as a seed bank maintaining a supply of seeds available for germination under the proper conditions (the concept of initial floristics of Egler, 1954). The composition of this soil seed bank determines to a great extent the Species composition of the initial stages of succession and to a lesser extent affects later stages. Early studies such as those of Beal (1905, 1911), Darlington (1951), and Goss (1924) investigated the via— bility of seeds buried for various periods of time. These studies showed that some weed seeds have long viability. Many were still viable after being buried for the twenty years in the Goss study while Darlington found several Species buried by Beal germinated after seventy years. Brenchley and Warington (1930, 1936) have studied the weed seed pOpulations of some British soils and discovered that most seeds have a natural period of dormancy which may last up to nine years. There also appeared to be a relation be- tween the type of manuring and the weed flora as a result of the seed content of the manure. Costing (1940) studied the viability of seeds in forest and field soils of various ages. The highest num- ber of individual plants germinating from soil samples placed in the greenhouse were in fields abandoned one year while the highest number of species occurred in.samples o t) .p ' 1 n 5 I I j I ‘3 .01 .10 1.0 10 100 .01 .10 1.0 10 100 S... 6‘3 Opening size (m2) 0 u) (3 a 0 as d 5 4 “ LA 5 __ 2 -- 9 1 -— ‘ I I I II“ .01 .10 1.0 10 100 .01 101 1.0 10 100 Opening size (m2) F180 5- Average per cent eover plotted against opening size for species showing trends in August of 1965. Solid lines are significant (5% level) regressions. Specie are: AmR, Amaranthus retroflexus; Amfi, Amaranthus albus; AR, Agropyron repens; AA, Ambrosia artemisiifolia; EC, Eragrostis reptans; LA, Lychnis albus; and RT. Rhus typhina. 34 Spa x\ Spa 1 1 TR L l J ‘1 I I ' I ' .1 1.0 10 100 . .1 1.0 10 100 Opening Size (m2) 35 *- Average Per Cent Cover ' . .1 1.0 10 100 .1 1.0 10 100 2) Opening Size (m Fig. 6. Average per cent cover plotted against opening size for species showing trends in June of 1966. Solid lines are significant (5% level) regressions. Species are: AR, Agropyron repens; ErA, Erigeron annuus; ErC, Erigeron canadensis; LB, Lactuca biennis; Spa, Specularia perfoliata; T3, Trifolium repens; and V, Veronica sp. 35 ‘ Arenaria sp. n . IArenaria sp. xi 1.0 10 100 h E Opening size (m2) ‘y 4: 3-- G o t) s W o 0* \ :3 2*’ \ 1g \ g 3%-. I \‘IK . I \ \’,. PCB-pratensis .. / 9’». "‘ Poa pratensis 1 ’0’ \ C, ’0’ ’ \ V i...»x\ 3‘ P08 compressa \ . \I‘""'X Poa compressa l l l I I l .1 1.0 10 100 Opening size (m2) Fig. 7. Average per cent cover plotted against opening size for species showing trends in June of 1966. Solid lines are significant (5% level) regressions. 36 3"" 2-.. / ,3 PP / / / 1"- ’./ / A / . A I )... x c K I . I‘jPC p ' l I I 1 I I g .1 1.0 10 1‘00 .1 1.0 10 100 :3 9 Opening size (m2) .‘3 O u) I v -- 3 so -- <: 6 __ 45 T A 51"\\ 4O ‘- // \ \ \ \ 55 ‘IP I 4 —. I ‘ EI'A . \ \ // 50-"1/ \ 31“ \ / 25V " \\-rc \ \ 20 J-,”“~V_——o .I‘ \ \ / , I' are 2"" \ I / LA 15 1 ' \ \J ’ \ 1 ___ o— .—...I>/ 10 'tr\ M 5'", \“~~-~:.::>N<;mA I I I I I I“ .1 1.0 10 100 .1 1.0 10 100 Opening size (m2) Fig. 8. Average per cent cover plotted against opening size for species showing trends in August of 1966. Solid lines are significant (5% level) regressions. Species are: AR. Agropyron repens; ErC, Erigeron canadensis; LA. Lychnis alba; LB, Lactuca biennis; PP, Poa pratensis; and P0, P08 compressa. ' 30” 37 20 ‘F 16 j; /\ / \ \ 12 v \ / \ \./ \ 8 .. /.A\\~ \ \ 'PR .’ \ -P \ g 4 //.\‘~o \ > \\\PR 8 f I I \I “A 4;: .1 1.0 10 100 0 ‘3 Opening size (m2) 3 . a. o 3 ‘ u) m h 8 .¢ 23> 1 1 I l I I l I .1 1.0 10 100 :1 1.0 10 100 Opening size (m2) Fig. 9. Average per cent cover plotted against opening size for species showing trends in June of 1967. Solid lines are significant (5% level) regressions. Species are: AR, Agropyron repens; Ere, Erigeron canadensis; PC, Poa compressa; PP. Poa pratensis; PR. Potentilla recta; RA, Rumex acetosella. 38 openings (0.01m2) to a meter and a half in the largest (lOOmz). Flowering and seed production occurred through- out the range of sizes but the number of flowers and Seeds appeared to be very much larger in the larger openings. C. Opening Size and Community Composition If the existing vegetation has an effect on incom- ing species, and if Size Opening affects establishment and survival of species, then the species composition (species hierarchies) of the different sized openings would very likely be different. A comparison of the different Sized Openings with respect to species composition was made using the coefficient C = of Bray and Curtis (Austin & Or- A + B loci, 1966), where W is the sum of the lesser values of species scores in common in two stands and A + B is the sum of species scores in each stand. Random samples of equal total area (13m2) were chosen from the 1-100m2 size classes while all of the 0.1m2 plots were used, these being the determinant of the 13m2 total area. The species scores were the average percent cover values. The coefficients obtained are presented in Table IV. 39 Table 1V.--Coefficients of Similarity between vegetation developing in openings of various Sizes cut into newly fallowed corn field. Opening Sizes August June August June compared 1965 1966 1966 1967 0.1 — 1.0 .500 .820 .724 .710 1.0 - 10 .800 .740 .705 .645 10 - 100 .555 .680 .725 .715 0.1 - 100 .361 .640 .805 .770 It can be seen that the smallest similarity coef- ficient (i.e. the greatest vegetation difference) occurs between the 0.1m2 and the 100m2 openings in the first grow- ing season. Since the coefficients do not show a clear trend with increasing opening Size, even in the first year, the strong trends with opening size shown in the cover of particular Species are probably obscured by the normal high variance in the bulk of the other species which is unrelated to Size opening. 40 D. Effect of Initial Species In the light of several earlier studies (e.g. Keever 1950, Rice 1967) it would be useful to know whether the species present at the initial stages of succession have a determining influence on the Species composition of later stages.. For the 128 0.1m2 openings plots were made of the per cent cover of Lactuca biennis, Erigeron annuus, Erigeron canadensis, Lychnis alba, Poa pratensis, Poa com- pressa, Ramex acetosella, and Potentilla recta in August 1966 versus the cover of Amaranthus retroflexus in the pre- ceding August of 1965, the initial dominant that year in the Openings and the species most sensitive to size or Opening (see Appendix C for graphs). For none of these species was their cover in 1966 directly correlated with the amount of Amaranthus cover in 1965 as determined through observation of the regression graphs, Appendix C. VI . DISCUSSION The complicated process of succession is a quasi- predictable (and therefore quasi—orderly) sequence of di- rectional changes in the species makeup and dominance hier- archy among the biota on a Site. These directional changes are wrought by the germination or expansion of species al— ready present on the site together with immigration, estab- lishment, reduction and local extinction of these various Species populations. There seems little question but that the Species already established on a site would exert some influence on the probabilities of success of species ap- pearing subsequently. The Species already present might influence germination, seedling survivorship, size of plant, and reproduction and longevity of adults. Modifications of this older vegetation by breaks or Openings in the plant cover is one way to study two questions experimentally: over what range of opening size are the effects of such interference by established species detectable? And, do the various Species respond similarly to such Openings? 41 42 In the corn crop annual weeds such as Amaranthus retroflexus, A. alba, Chenopodium album, Ambrosia artem- isiifolia, Setaria viridis, etc. occur, but the corn it- self is the clear dominant. Weed control and other manage- ment Operations influence both the amount and kinds of weeds that occur with the crop. In the field studied, fal- lowing without disturbance after the October 1964 corn harvest gave rise by the subsequent late summer (August 1965) to a vegetation having a major component of non- annual Species. These were Lyghnis alba, Rhus typhina, Potentilla recta, and Erigeron annuus. Although definitely secondary some annuals were still present such as Ambrosia artemisiifolia, Oxalis stricta, and Amaranthus Sp. By the following summer (August 1966) Poa pgatensis had achieved first place, and although a biennial (Erigeron canadensis) occupied second place, the characteristic grassy old-field vegetation of southern Michigan was clearly emerging. The June 1967 dominance hierarchy Shows the grassy nature even more clearly. The presence of so much Rhus typhina (staghorn sumac) in this field is a Special circumstance owing to its persist- ence following planting as a cover plant in an abortive 43 attempt to establish a walnut orchard many years earlier (personal communication from Mr. Harold Webster). On the Openings made in the fallow corn field in June 1965, a pronounced dominance by annual weeds occurred. The vegetation in these Openings was developmentally the same age as the corn-weed mixture that preceded the fallow. Amaranthus retroflexus is clearly the Species favored when the soil of a fallow corn field is turned over in early June in Michigan. Lychnis alba, though not an annual, is also high but such other annuals as Mollugo verticillata and Ambrosia artemisiifolia tend to be among the top five species in total cover except in the very smallest open— ings (0.01m2). The perennial grasses are well down the dominance hierarchy in the first growing season. By the subsequent late summer (August 1966) biennials, especially Erigeron spp. and Lactuca spp., took over the most promi— nent role. The perennials Lychnis alba, Agropyron repens, and Rhus typhina were definitely present but secondary. This greater importance of biennials and lower importance of the perennials is a major difference between the undis- turbed corn fallow and the openings made in it when they are compared after the same length of development (i.e. 44 matrix August 1965 compared with openings August 1966). In particular, Erigeron canadensis was much less impor— tant in the undisturbed fallow than in the Openings. This could largely be a matter of seed source buildup, the weeds in the corn crop providing a very low inocculum of this Species. Other differences were the greater importance of Agropyron repens and lower cover of Lychnis alba, Poten- tilla recta and Oxalis stricta in Openings than in the un- disturbed fallow. It is not possible to demonstrate whether these particular differences are significant due to the high variance inherent in this vegetation. However, as noted earlier, Agropyron repens does exhibit a positive correla- tion with increasing opening size which tends to support the notion that something about the undisturbed fallow sit- uation is less favorable for the Species. Some, but not all, Species that had higher cover in the undisturbed corn fallow than in the openings (e.g. Oxalis stricta, Poa com- pressa and Potentilla recta) tend to exhibit negative re- gressions with size of Opening in the fallow vegetation. All these Species are likely candidates for future studies on mechanisms in old-field succession. 45 The data presented in Figs. 5 through 9 show that the per cent cover of some species tends to increase sig- nificantly with increasing Size of Opening while other Species show a significant decrease. Of the species signi- ficantly positively correlated with Opening size Amaranthus retroflexus was the most pronounced. It was the dominant in all openings except the smallest (0.01m2), in their first growing season. Amaranthus retroflexus has a large capacity for plastic response and its greater per cent cover in the bigger Openings appears to be more a reflection of increased size of individuals than increased numbers per unit area. Viewed in reverse this would suggest that increased fre— quency of establishment of individual plants is inadequate to compensate for the dwarfing effects of the interference by surrounding one year older follow vegetation. The re- lationship suggests that Amaranthus is very sensitive to interference from established species or from its own de- composition products Of the preceding generation. The vegetation surrounding the Openings at this time was domi- nated by Lychnis alba, Rhus typhina, Ambrosia artemisiifo- lia, Oxalis stricta, and Erigeron annuus. Amaranthus either requires a large area essentially free of effects of these 46 species or of some other characteristic of the one year older vegetation in order to achieve maximum growth. While it is tempting to Speculate here that herbi— cides used with the corn crop might also be involved, the presence of vigorous Amaranthus plants with the corn crop itself argue against such an effect. Unquestionably Amaranthus requires some minimum area free of Significant interference for establishment. This minimal area is smaller than 0.01m2 since the species had about 3%.average cover in these smallest openings and reached a maximum of 90% on some. Occasional individuals or clusters of individuals were also present in the undis— turbed one year old fallow vegetation where this species ranked seventh from the top in total cover contribution. However, the minimal interference-free area probably has a very low frequency after this first full year of fallow, since Amaranthus disappeared from the samples after then. It has been suggested (oral communication Rice, 1967; Gregg and McCormick, 1966) that Amaranthus, like other first year old—field annuals (Keever, 1950), may be inhibited by its own decomposition products as well as those of other old— field species. 47 The direct correlation between per cent cover of Amaranthus and area of opening may reflect allelOpathic or other kinds of interference by surrounding one year older vegetation. The zone of major interference can hardly ex— tend all the way to the centers of the largest 100m2 open— ing size. Possibly this is simply a reflection of a de— creasing ratio of the area of the inhibited zone to the total area of the Opening, i.e., if we were to assume the interference to be restricted to a band one meter inward from the older vegetation, in the 1m2 Opening the entire area would be subject to interference, in the 10m2 open- ing only about 92% of the area, and in the lOOmzopeningS only about 36%‘wou1d be influenced. A comparison of per cent cover of Amaranthus retroflexus in 36 central versus 36 perimeter 1m2 plots in the 100m2 blocks Showed that for the 100m2 blocks Amaranthus cover was consistently less in the perimeter plots. This difference was significant . 2 at the 5% level (t test) in two of the four 100m blocks. This tends to substantiate the idea of interference as a cause for decreased cover of Amaranthus. No attempt has been made as yet to characterize the nature of the mechanisms responsible for the dwarfing of Amaranthus. 48 The positive trends of more cover with increasing Opening Size found for other Species, especially in the second and third growing seasons, may be a result of simi- lar interference phenomena. It would seem that there might be a positive correlation between per cent of the area bare of vegetation and Opening size since invasion by the older peripheral vegetation, especially the grasses, would reach the whole Opening in the smaller ones more rapidly. This in turn would permit species which require bare area for establishment or persistence to remain longer and in greater abundance in larger openings. Thus some of the positive trends found may be due to the varying rapidity with which different sized Openings are occupied by perennial vegeta- tion. Or stating it another way, they may be due to the variation in amount of bare or competition-free area in the different sized Openings. Some of the negative trends with increasing opening size may simply reflect the slower rate of invasion from the surrounding one year older undisturbed fallow. g g Egg- tensis, for example, eXpands vegetatively in addition to new colonizations by seed. However, as noted above, this species increased its per cent cover in the undisturbed 49 fallow vegetation more rapidly than in the openings cut into this vegetation. This could be an interference phe— nomenon in the Openings from the greater impact of Amagag— Ehgg there. Also, it could simply be a more successful re- tention of fertilizer residues missed by the corn crop by 393 plants established slightly earlier in the succession and subject to less bare ground leaching. Potentilla recta also exhibits higher cover in the original fallow array and less cover in the larger opening sizes. The possibility exists that some of the species ex- hibiting significant positive correlations with opening size may simply reflect a greater interference effect from the species noted above which are more important in the smaller openings. Erigeron canadensis, for example, might be adversely affected by higher Poa compressa cover. Cor— relation studies of the percent cover of these two Species in the various individual quadrats did not reveal any such trend. The number of samples available was far too small for identifying any but the most spectacular correlations so the lack of significant correlations can hardly be given great weight. 50 The positive relationships of cover with Opening size for species such as Rhus typhina, Agropyron repens, Lychnis alba, and Poa pratensis may be related to their large vegetative reproductive organs which survive plowing well. This gives these species a distinct advantage in the initial re-vegetation of the large Openings where most of the other species must start from the seedling stage. All four species appear to be able to contend with the higher cover of Amaranthus retroflexus that becomes established in these large Openings. The most convincing negative regressions between species cover and size of opening are those of Poa compressa and Potentilla recta. Three other species (Rumex acetosella, Trifolium repens, and Veronica sp.) exhibit significant neg— ative relationships but they are species of small total coven and it is very possible that underestimations of per cent cover, or the possibility of being overlooked, is much greater for such small or less common individuals on the larger sample units. Of these, however, it is to be noted that legumes such as Trifolium repens are said to be adversely affected by decomposition products of first year dominant annuals 51 (Rice §t_§l,, 1967). It is possible that the greater masses of decomposing Amaranthus on the larger Openings produced a greater suppression of these legumes there as the hierarchies indicate a trend of decreasing legume cover with increasing opening Size in June of 1966. The particular weather sequence that precedes and accompanies the initial establishment of a vegetation on agricultural land is undoubtedly an important variable. No effects are directly relateable in the present study but June and July of 1965 had some droughty periods in the study area. The rhizomatous perennials in the larger open- ings may have been favored by this more than seed—started species. The dominance hierarchy was suggested (Whittaker, 1965) as a useful method of portraying both the biomass and the site's resource allocation among the species in an eco- system. With large representative samples of a vegetation on a homogeneous area these curves tend to approximate the log—normal curve discussed by Preston (1948, 1960) and Clark gt_§1,(1964). Numata and Yamai (1955) have Shown that in annual weed vegetation the hierarchical order changes among the species with the season. Also, their curves were 52 characterized by flat plateaus which indicated that several Species tended to share the same relative dominance position. In the June 1966 hierarchy of total cover for species for this study similar plateaus occur (Appendix B, Figs. i, j, and k). It is suggested that these reflect interim values and as interaction between the species becomes fully de- velOped the log-normal hierarchy tends to be the final out- come. Ogawa and Kira (1953) and more recently Harper (1967) have pointed out the tendency for the log-normal relation— ship to develop in competition. Interacting plants with- drawing resources from the same pools tend to bring posi- tive feedback into play wherein the individuals getting the slightest advantages in withdrawing resources utilize these resources to build bigger resource trapping machines (roots or tops) which in turn enlarge the advantage. It is pos- sible that under more controlled experimental conditions with more uniform Species arrays, careful study of the shifting hierarchical positions among the Species may give clues to when and between what species such interactions might be anticipated. In the present study, however, there was far too much variation and the observations too widely spaced in time to draw much from these hierarchical changes. VI I . SUMMARY AND CONCLUS I ONS The course of succession is slightly different in Open- ings created in a fallow vegetation as compared to the succession in the undisturbed fallow itself, even when the openings are made the early June following the corn crop. The agricultural manipulations made for the corn crop, such as herbicides, high fertilizer, and cultivation, as well as effects from the corn plants themselves are missing in the Openings. The corn-annual weed first year vegetation of the corn field is represented by the Amaranthus retroflexus- dominated vegetation in the openings. In the second year the fallow corn field becomes domi- nated largely by perennials, although the biennial, Erigeron canadensis, is prominent. The Openings on the other hand are dominated in the second year by biennials. This difference may be due 53 54 to several causes: greater biennial seed inocculum in the openings, smaller fertilizer residues, or possibly a greater resistance to decomposition products of Ama- ranthus retroflexus. None of these possible causes was experimentally evaluated. By the onset of the third growing season, the differ- ences between the Openings and the fallow corn land become less but Poa compressa and Poa pratensis are generally more prominent in the fallow than in the Open- ings. Smaller openings are very much more like the fallow corn than are the larger openings, but this difference which is great the first year wanes by the third grow- ing season. The per cent cover of 14 of the 77 species appears to be correlated with the Size of the opening. Of these 14, the most dramatic effects were observed in Amaran- thus retroflexus which is significantly positively cor- related with increasing opening Size across the range of 0.01m2, 0.1m2, 1.0m2, and 100m2 areas. 10. 11. 12. 55 This increasing per cent cover of Amaranthus in the larger openings is accompanied by an increase in size of the Amaranthus plants. The mechanisms responsible for the dwarfing in the smaller Openings have not been determined in this study. Positive correlations between per cent cover and in- creasing opening size were also observed for other Species, several (Agropyron repens, Lychinis alba, Rhus typhina, and Poa p;atensis).being populations largely derived from vigorous vegetative propagules which survive plowing in the Openings. Some Species appear to produce greater per cent cover in the smaller openings than in the larger ones. In general these are species that also show greater per cent cover in the undisturbed fallow vegetation. No attempt has been made in this study to investigate the mechanisms that might produce such effects. . 2 Results from this study suggest that the 10m and the 100m2 opening sizes are not apt to yield important in- sights into germination and establishment processes in 13. 14. 56 old-field vegetation. This study together with that of Caruso (1963) leads to the recommendation that smaller Openings, perhaps 1cm2 to 100 m2, will be most likely to give clues to processes Operating in early old—field succession. While some clear vegetation differences are observed in the Openings made in first-year fallow vegetation, this study also indicates that older vegetation some— where between this young age and the 30—year old grassy field of Caruso (1963) may yield the best study medium. For the range of sizes used, it seems that the size Opening does not affect the pattern of succession by altering Species composition, nor does it seem that the initial dominant annuals have a major determining in- fluence on the pattern of succession. This latter is suggested by the lack of correlation of any dominants in the second year with per cent cover of Amaranthus retroflexus, the first year dominant. At least Ama- ranthus retroflexus does not seem to strongly control future community organization. 15° 16. 57 In the long run it might be the initial perennial spe— cies composition which may be a greater determinant in early stages of Old—field succession. Through their ability to invade and hold space, the early perennials may be the controlling factor in determining the pat- tern a given succession takes and also the vegetational patterning in Space seen in the field at later stages. Dominance hierarchies (Whittaker, 19657 Numata, 1955) based on total cover are not a great deal more useful than conventional summaries for visualizing the make-up of old—field vegetation or the changes in it, either within the same growing season or in comparing years. However the hierarchies show up some things worth in- vestigating further, e.g. the close spacing of the tOp two dominants at times and the plateaus such as occurred in the June 1966 samples. This "close Spacing" or pla— teauing of the tendency for a more log—normal hier— archial arrangement may have merit for identifying po— tentially interesting species combinations. LITERATURE CITED Austin, M. P. and L. Orloci. 1966. Geometric models in ecology II. An evaluation of some ordination tech- niques. J. Ecol. 54:217-227. Bard G. 1952. Secondary succession on the Piedmont of New Jersey. Ecol. Monogr. 22:195—215. Beal, W. J. 1905. The viability of seeds. Bot. Gaz. 40: 140-143. Beal, W. J. 1911. The viability of seeds buried in the soil. Proc. Soc. Promotion Agric. Sci. 31:21-23. Beckwith, S. L. 1954. Ecological succession on abandoned farm lands and its relation to wildlife management. Ecol. Monogr. 24:349-376. Billings, D. W. 1938. The structure and development of old-field shortleaf pine stands and certain asso- ciated physical properties of the soil. Ecol. Monogr. 82437-499. Bormann, F. H. 1953. Factors determining the role of lob- 1olly pine and sweet-gum in early old-field suc- cession in the Piedmont of North Carolina. Ecol. Monogr. 23:339-358. Brenchley, W. E. and K. Warington. 1930. The weed seed population of arable soil. I. Numerical estimation of viable seeds and observations on their dormancy. Journ. Ecol. 18:235-272. Brenchley, W. E. and K. Warington. 1936. The weed seed pOpulation of arable soil. III. The re-establish- ment of weed Species after reduction by fallowing. Journ. Ecol. 24:479-501. 58 59 Cain, S. A. and F. C. Evans. 1952. The distribution pat- terns of three plant species in an old—field com- munity in southeastern Michigan. Contr. Lab. Vert. Bio. 5221-11. University of Michigan. Caruso, J. 1963. Interspecific pattern in an old—field community in southwest Michigan. Unpub. MS thesis Michigan State University. Cavers, P. B. and J. L. Harper. 1967. Studies in the dy— namics of plant populations. I. The fate of seed and transplants introduced into various habitats. J. Ecol. 55:59-71. Clark, P. J. and F. C. Evans. 1954. Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecol. 35:445-453. Clark, P. J., P. T. Eckstrom and L. C. Linden. 1964. On the number of individuals per occupation in a human society. Ecol. 45:367—372. Clements, F. E. 1928. Plant Succession and Indicators. H. W.‘Wilson Co. New York. 453 p. Clements, F. E. 1916. Plant succession: an analysis of the development of vegetation. Carn. Inst. Wash. Publ. No. 242. 512 pp. Curtis, J. T. 1959. The Vegetation of Wisconsin. Univ. of Wisc. Press, Madison. 657 pp. Darlington, H. T. 1951. The seventy-year period for Dr. Beal's seed viability experiment. Amer. Jour. Bot. 38:379-381. Dice, L. R. 1931. A preliminary classification of the major terrestrial ecologic communities of Michigan, exclusive of Isle Royale. Papers Mich. Acad. Sci., Arts and Letters. 16:217-239. Egler, F. E. 1954. Vegetation science concepts. I. Ini— tial floristic composition, a factor in old-field vegetation development. Vegetatio 42412-417. 6O Evans, F. C. and S. A. Cain. 1952. Preliminary studies on the vegetation of an old-field community in southeastern Michigan. Contr. Lab. Vert. Bio. University of Michigan 51:1—19. Evans, F. C. and E. Dahl. 1955. The vegetational struc- ture of an abandoned field in souteastern Michigan and its relation to environmental factors. Ecol. 36:685-706. Fernald, M. L. 1950. Gray's Manual of Botany. Eighth ed. American Book Co. N.Y. 1632 pp. Getz, L. L. 1960. Standing crop of herbaceous vegetation in southern Michigan. Ecol. 41:393—395. Golley, F. B. 1960. Energy dynamics of a food chain of an old-field community. Ecol. Monogr. 30:187-206. Golley, F. B. 1965. Structure and function of an old- field broomsedge community. Ecol. Monogr. 35: 113-137. Goss, W. L. 1924. Viability of buried seeds. Jour. Ag. Res. 29:349-362. Gregg, W. P. Jr. and J. McCormick. 1966. Stunting of an- nuals in second-year old-field vegetation. Paper presented AIBS annual meetings College Pk., Md. August 1966. Harper, J. L., J. T. Williams and G. R. Sagar. 1965. The behavior of seeds in soil. I. The heterogeneity of soil surfaces and its role in determining the establishment of plants from seed. Jour. Ecol. 53:273—286. Harper, J. L. and R. A. Benton. 1966. The behavior of seeds in soil. II. The germination of seeds on the surface of a water supplying substrate. Jour. Ecol. 54:151-166. Harper, J. L. 1967. A Darwinian approach to plant ecology. J. Ecol. 55:247-270. 61 Keever, C. 1950. Causes of succession on old—fields of the Piedmont, North Carolina. Ecol. Monogr. 20: 229—250. Kershaw, K. A. 1963. Pattern in vegetation and its cau— sality. Ecol. 44:377—388. Kira, T., H. Ogawa, and N. Sagazaki. 1953. Intraspecific competition among higher plants. I. Competition- density—yield interrelationship in regularly dis- persed populations. J. Inst. Polytech. Osaka Cy. Univ. Ser D, 4:1-16. Margalef, R. 1963. Succession in marine populations. Adv. Frontiers Plant Sci. 22137-188. Milthorpe, F. L., editor. 1961. Mechanisms in Biological Competition. Synposia of the Society for EXperi- mental Biology No. 15. Academic Press. 365 pp. Numata, M. and H. Yamai. 1955. The developmental process of weed communities; Experimental studies on early stages of a secondary succession, 1 Jap. J. Ecol. 42166-171. Odum, E. P. 1960. Organic production and turnover in old- field succession. Ecol. 41:34—49. Odum, E. P., C. E. Connell and L. B. Davenport. 1962. POpulation energy flow of three primary consumer components of old-field ecosystems. Ecol. 43:88-96. Odum, Soren. 1965. Germination of ancient seeds. Dansk Botanisk Arkiv 2427-70. Oosting, H. J. and M. E. Humphreys. 1940. Buried viable seeds in a successional series of old-field and forest soils. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 67:253-273. Oosting, H. J. 1942. An ecological analysis of the plant communities of Piedmont of North Carolina. Amer. Midl. Nat. 2821-126. 62 Preston, F. W. 1948. The commoness and rarity of species. Ecol. 293254-283. Preston, F. W. 1960. Time and space and the variation of species. Ecol. 412611-627. Rice, E. L., W. T. Penfound and L. M. Rohrbaugh. 1960. Seed dispersal and mineral nutrition in succession in abandoned fields in central Oklahoma. Ecol. 41:224-228. Rice, E. L. and R. L. Parenti. 1967. Inhibition of nitrogen- fixing and nitrifying bacteria by seed plants. V. Inhibitors produced by Bromus japonicus Thunb. S. W. Nat. 12397—103. Robinson, E. L. and C. A. Kust. 1962. Distribution of Witchweed seed in soil. Weeds 102335. Salisbury, E. J. 1942. Reproductive Capacity of Plants; Studies in Quantitative Biology. G. Bell and Sons. London. 244 pp. Whittaker, R. H. 1965. Dominance and diversity in land plant communities. Science 147:250-260. Wiegert, R. G. and F. C. Evans. 1964. Primary production and the disappearance of dead vegetation on an old- field in southeastern Michigan. Ecol. 45:49-63. Woodford, E. K. and S. A. Evans. 1965. Weed Control Hand- book. Blackwell Sci. Publ., Oxford. 434 p. Woodwell, G. M. 1965. Radiation and the Patterns of Nature. Brookhaven Lecture Series No. 45. March 24 p. 1-15. APPENDIX A LIST OF SPECIES OCCURRING IN SAMPLES APPENDIX A LIST OF SPECIES OCCURRING IN SAMPLES Achillea Millefolium L. Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv. Amaranthus albus L. Amaranthus retroflexus L. Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. Anthemis arvensis L. Arenaria sp. Arabis glabra (L.) Bernh. Aribidopsis Thaliana (L.) Heynh. Asclepias syriaca L. Aster sp. Barbarea vulgaris L. Bromus tectorum L. Capsella Bursa-pastoris (L.) Medic. Carex sp. Chenopodium album L. Chenopodium sp. 64 Chrysonthemum Leucanthemum L. Cirsium vulgare (Savi) Tenore Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. Eragrostis reptans (Michx.) Nees Erigeron annuus (L.) Pers. Erigeron canadensis L. Fragaria sp. Galium Aparine L. Geranium sp. Hypericum sp. Lactuca biennis (Moench) Fern. Lactuca canadensis var. longifolia (Michx.) Farw. Lepidium canpestre (L.) R. Br. . [I ‘1! ,- i' 65 Lepidium virginicum L. Lychnis alba Mill. Malva neglecta Wallr. Medicago lupulina L. Medicago sativa L. Medicago sp. Melilotus alba Desv. Melilotus sp. Mollugo verticillata L. Nepeta Cataria L. Oenothera sp. Oxalis stricta L. Panicum capillare L. Phleum pratense L. Physalis pubescens L. Plantago lanceolata L. Plantago Rugelli Dcne. Plantago virginica L. Poa compressa L. Poa pratensis L. Polygonum Convolvulus L. Polygonum Persicaria L. Portulaca sp. Potentilla argentea L. Potentilla norvegica L. Potentilla recta L. Rhus typhina L. Rumex Acetosella L. Rumex crispus L. Rumex obtusifolius L. Setaria viridis—glauca Silene antirrhina L. Sisymbrium altissimum L. Sisymbrium officinale (L.) SCOp. Solanum nigrum L. Solidago sp. Specularia perfoliata (L.) A.D.C. Stellaria sp. Taraxacum officinale Weber Tragopogon major Jacq. Trifolium hybridum L. Trifolium pratense L. Trifolium repens L. 66 Trifolium sp. Ulmus sp. Verbascum Thapsus L. Verbena sp. Veronica sp. Unknown grass seedlings Unknown rosette PVL Unknown rosette Unknown seedlings Unknown L APPENDIX B GRAPHS OF TOTAL PER CENT COVER OF SPECIES VERSUS SPECIES RANK (BASED ON TOTAL COVER) FOR ALL SAMPLING TIMES AND OPENING SIZES 68 103000 1' .lb 1000 ‘0- 100 . snafiouoaafla aoaaanoa; a .Qm Esacomosono . sapwofimnog EssowhHom . , azaaomwmsnno Noesr .I. . onQAOAMMo Esoaxapme . mwswaccom nsodx:D . ammonmfioo mom .6» mspofiaficz omnoucpa Estouwa mwswaomom macho. wHHomouoom Nessa 55pm“: Enamaom .dm «Hhqumfia . mdmcccanmo sonowwpw acacHwIchwpw> mwpxpom maanoL mwumopwmpm mwmcopwpg mom masco«n monuoaq 65H5>Ho>coo Somewhaom anodes cophm0pw< Eznaw SSwUOQosono wsflfifidafl owwowcoz . mSKcHLOApop mflQpCcpaE< mssncw nopowfipw sunflppm mfiHwKo. «poop afifiauscpom anaouaamasmppm wamopned wcfinahp mafia, M «paw ”assess - a —b o. . 1. 1. po>oo 9600 new Hana? mamawnp ESOmwQLo>. I I II I II I l' I II I 'I II I 'l I II I II'I I, p . lb 4 I la Ranked Species abundance hierarchy f0 " undisturbed nked by total A Species rs Species fallow plots in August 1965. cover found in 150 plots. Fig. a. 69 mfipwwan> monmnawm msoomonsm mwammhnm moawo>poa mHHHpcmpom .Qm mpogpocoo manam manucamed mbfipwm omwowcoz. wflpaumo mpcmoz. scams cowomomwne upwflooosmfi omwucmwm opamfisb Enampfio cpwaawoaphob omsHHOE Hbm Gsocxab monsompw mHHHpcouom .dm ESAHOMHpB - _ 109000 1000 100 4" 1r- db - I n» 1. 1. po>oo uaoo you H1309 0 ‘L I II I 'l I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II 'Ranked Species Continued Fig. 30 70 I .1- 109000 1000 ‘II' 100 o Sande afifiponosono onwflafiawo Baowcwm. aostwImeanfi> «weapom snag» 25m epoch waafipnouom mwaflaooom mango waaomopoom Nessa mwcaacoom soqup. ands macAOSQW msxoamonpop manpcmme<. «newspm mwamxo mwnwacoom nsocxnb cpwaawoappo> owsaaoz, anodes coshnopw<. banana nonowwpfi. P _ I d .« nu. 1. 1 ‘F .1 no>ou ucoo pom Hana? Ranked Species .01m2 opening ranked by total per cent ’1 Q ndance hierarchy f0 Species Species abu cover found in 592 plots. plots in August 1965. F18. be 71 ‘- 103000 1000 qu- 100 o . enemas Benson... o Banana SHcOQOsQSI . mosanIuHch: 393$ I o assume.“ mwpmocwmpm I. o manganese momI o 0.3.5.360 Esoflcmm I o mfiHOMHHmflEcppw $30,584 I 0 .mm wflhwunHQI e _ mwpmmflg mopmnpem I. nfisccc copewwLWI a mmcflflcoeh weasel o . «HHomOpoom KefismI magmas ammoacesl magnum manudanwsd I. 332603 £30255 I. gauge?» "3er unease, mwamxo I epoch eHHHucopom I anodes defiance? I «Spam owwoweez I macadaowppeb owgaoz I . gnaw mafiflohfil uaofiuonn on manucesméw I . _ . fl ,1 q 0. 1. 1 p260 9600 new Hence . d . .JL 0 Ranked Species 'Specics abundance hierarchy for 0.1m2 opening plots in August 1965. Species ranked by total per cent cover found in 128 plots. Fig. 00 72 ‘- 109000 . mwcHHcoom mango o I. mosmeIchHpr «Heepcm a I Ssan: Escwaom o I h .mm «Hammdhmm a I mHmfiepwhm mom. a I .Qm eonnomhm o I. omcopanm_SsHHomee a I mHmsocncao nonmenL. o I msHHOHHmnpno Kefisr o I . a. okaHHHmdo ESOHcam I a mHmamnp Enomepgo> I. o _ .Qm «HamprHnI a m9Hs>Ho>fico Esnowhaom.. I. mpoanm mHHexo I . mHHonOpcoa Kcfisr I o . nuance dopoanw.l o 539?. achoaocmno I e muooflwec m>HeEI e . mamas maanapwE<_I a unmade.“ memccmepr o . mpprm owwOHcoz I. 0 $33323 owsflos I a name?» Gogmopwxa I a emmmpdfioo com I o aanES 9.55 I a meonmpom Epsothom.l o mHHOHHHnHEopnm mHmopne<.I e _ epoch eHHHpceuom.I _ . n H p H . . ‘ nu. 1. 1. - .1 db ‘1 1000 100 po>oo pace nom.aeaoe wanna m Hanohn I q @338 0.5 on manganese/e. I L d 0_ Ranked Species Species ranked by total per cent Species abundance hierarchy for 1.0m2 opening plots in August 1965. cover found in 50 plots. Fig. do 73 10 9000 ' 1000 4L— qu- 100 "1" a . annoyance domI e _ .mm «Hanson eHampemI. woprhn deQcHeQHo>coo Escomhaom.I manm msmpcmpwfie I Eznaw ESHcouocono I enemas cogdoame I «noon mHHHucouom.. epaHHHOHpnob owSHHo:.l c5393 3:? I eHHoyHHnHEopae mHmcapE¢.. 38 3503 .. ezkcamonpcp mssucenwEd.I _ P b — . i H J _ Ranked Species Species ranked by total per cent Species abundance hierarchy for 10mg opening plots in August 1955. H q 0 . 1 0 1 ao>oo uceo pom deuce coverfound in 18 plots (182 subdivision plots). F180 60 74 ‘- 10,000 “- 1000 fir 100 ..osHHouHmspno Keeam. mpdnoeocea ommpseHm oncogene SJHHoanB censowpm.wHHHpnoadm o, C‘- 9 69H9>Ho>coo ezsowaom 300 III! a annecwseo doaoprmI a OHcGHOHcmo SSOHKmme I. o «HacmOpcoe KcEnmuI 9 - memes> weacphwm.I a mHGCCHp nonpomn I o EshmHn Esfianom.r a muoHLpe nHHaKo.l a . spoon eHHHerpom I o mwGHHUcem :aocxsbr. 9 . 33333? omsflos... .mm theunHQ Esnas echomoccno assume coccprE onsHHHnwo Eoncwm aoflmfiwIchHLH> mewaom mwsHHccem macho msanao Kcesm anodes nephaopw< aHHouHHmHEcuaw choppfid accused mHumOLwepw mamas manpcspce< mania» 2.5 spam nHacoeq esonMompos msnuceams¢ I _ , b _ L , _ d _ J «L- 0 . 1.. O 1 L¢>oo ucco Low H6909 Ranked Species Species ranked by total per cent cover 8 t O 1 D. 2 m 0 O 1 P O f V". h o c S r .C a 0 P 1 e n: i h \l S e t C 0 n 1 a P d n n u 0 b .1 a S .1. 8 V 6.1 15.0 06.0 69H p18 S .30 SO ou4 0181‘ u 0A4 8 inn F11 75 ‘- 10 9000 .1- 1000 100 4+- «I. o canvpema 853nm .I o ESHHOHcHHHE eoHHH£o¢ I o :3 Eonnoahm I e henmfi cowaowepe I o mammHno Meant I a onecHOHmuo BSOHKeae9.l a . eppcfiw anwL¢ I o enumeaEmo ESHpHdeH.. o mSHHomHmspno Keesr.. esHOHHHmHEcppm mHmoan<.. Essence» msanm.l wungpm 9:95 I nHmmmMp Esomepno>.. asoHaokE ESHHOHHLE I omficpmpg ESHHoanE.. epwHHchcm eHLmfisccom.l «HHomOpooa xcesrr. mHscoHn. moflpomq I mHmcccmcwo copoanW.. anodes ESHHomeB.. anodes coshmoam¢.l ammopmfioo com I Am .3332? e559? 35w I ecHHzQDH owechesn. .Qm ercneLa. I. mHmceumaQ com I 3558 coaomem. I spoon «HHHpGepom.. spam chnpcuI 1 l o. 1 0 1 . p . H H «— L¢>oo pace Lem Hence Ranked Species Species abundance hierarchy for undisturbed fallow plots in June 1966. Species ranked by total per cent cover found in 150 plots. Fig. g. 76 ‘- 103000 1000 H»- 100 BE 5383:. , mHmno>aw mHEonuG¢ . eumHooocmH omwustm wcHnapHpce chHHm. «OHwe>aos «HHHpcopom .Qn EflHGmAec concomae wHHHpcopom L _ . p _ d H Au. 1. .l. . p¢>oo uceo Lem Hence 01 Ranked Species F 1g . 8 continued . 77 . «macaw mHnmn¢ ecHnnaHpcm cacHHw. EsaHmmHuHe EsHpQShmHm. wpmaooocmd omepcmHm .pm> nHmcececwo weapowa, O o o p _ a o . 1 «+ Hr— «r- 10,000 7- 1000 100 mammHno Meant I . mm anm new I hOwdE nowomoweae I one mnpoaHHoz I. omaeuwsn EsHHouHaB I .eHHOHHHmHEepnw «HmOpQE< I Essence» msaoam I ammopmsoo com I «HaowOpeow NoEsr I. anodes ccphmoaw¢.I eanmhp mnnm I .Qm mOHsono> I e>Hpmm owoncoE.I mHmcepeaa won I. _epeHHompom wHamHserm I daemon EsHHOMHpe I spoon wHHHpaopom I wnHasapH owoncozmI mHacoHn mospomn I. epr mHsnohq I .Qn preseAd I aHucccaamo concMHpE.I masses GoncprE I L I a d A 1.. 0 ae>eo uceo Lem Hence 0 I I II I II Ranked Species Species ranked by total per cent Species abundance hierarchy for 0.1m2 opening plots in June 1966. cover found in 128 plots. Fig. he 78 ‘- 10 3000 ‘— «r- 1000 I. «OHusaH>nowsaneHm gfiHemeHe EsHpnfihmHm mHmmmnp Enemappo> oncogene. ESHHOMHLB o 100 ‘1” .1- 9 O o 9 3 II I II I I! aches nowavwmnaI 93.3% mHnendI wanna"; ammo H862! .dm EsoHaoahmI 0 333338.“. 3335... eanaaHpsw cacHHwI used?“ ESHHOMHE. I eHmcccmceo ConcchE. I A? EBOHHHoEI ammopQEoo com! euwHHom pen preasoeam I H r d H nv 1. ae>oo peso sea :3 doHccae> I 35:93 mnfimI. mHmCepepa mom I oppmcmeo £36309 I epoch wHHHucepomx. anodes sophnoam<.. «Haemouooc Keenan! gnaw mHHEES I chsoHp cospomqru .mm sHLecop¢CI menace :oacanv.I I 1 l 1. .0 as» 09 Ranked Species Species ranked by total per cent Spedies abundance hierarchy for 1.0m2 opening plots in June 1966. cover found in 50 plots. F180 10 79 10 9000 1000 J.- 100 ‘k eopnomaa.eaaencopoa. o. EsEHe 35 He EsHathmHm . Cli- a £3. Eonaoahm I s seesaw meape I 0 .dm menoaHHez I e nHQOnp Esomepne>.l. o . ocHnmmw ESHHmo.I . Aches GowoaowepegI msHHOHHmsnno Nessa I .EHEOpoop 268.5 I oncogene EsHaaHnB II . msmmHLo Madam I ecHQLAHpsm cceHHm I doathm mmHmoHome I .Qm 80Hcopo> I anodes SSHHOMHLE I. senescence mom I mHmSopeaQ mom I «GHSES mg? I ecHHsmzH owwOHpczI wHHomOpeoe K0836! ansoomcwo noncmHaE.. ecumemEmo EsHpHdcn I eveHHOHaoQ praHnocmm;I anode.» GOESOLM¢ I snoop mHHHnsepomTI .Qm «HenceedvI an? chEobH I mHGGOHn mogomu I nuance noaoanfi I b q «I- p n b a q A O 1.. 0 1 hobo". pace mom Heaon. Ranked Species ndance hierarchy for 10mg opening Species ranked by total per cent Species abu cover found in 18(162 subdivision plots) plots. plots in June 1966. 10.000 T 80 1000 -- 10° 4*" . ' I . I-I :5 p di- I] mw-l :2 8 do > 0'6 8 €35. .- (U . .2 10 Inggz 0 345:3 ° - m”?! g P £326 0 «DOV-I 0. Sam ' ‘t'I-th 3 . g dr— Q 1 o 0 “ I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II Ranked Species Fig 0 5 con tinned e 81 ‘F' 109000 ~- 1000 .nm 5:0Hacahm o ouccuwhn_snoanm ..o echHoHHmo Bsonehee EsSHnnHu He EsprshmHm o I a .mu EaneaowI o .90 09003ch I c 89.009000 msanm I e enpwaw 25004 I. s 053093390 Keenr I e . gages» Enomcppo> I a. mHmao>pm mHEecScd I I . waaomgoom x0530. I 9 000398.. ESHHOHHLB II a eHHOMHHmHEoupw eHmoaQE<.. o macaeh.E9HHo.HHpB I e .372: nomenomepe I I 0.3ng mopennmm I o eaHHsanH owoncoz II I .. 0.5000500 EchHmeq I 9 :3 00.30.03, I senescence com I _ «noes wHHHpccuom I . msamHLo Refinm I. 03:30.5 com I came precop¢ I SEES 3ng epmHHoupon eHaeHsoodm.. mHnCececmo coacwHfiu II cacao; confines“? I 52 3:53 I 00530. mospemq I 652.50 nepomHaE I P .- . 1 d J 0 . 1 0 1.. D 'l b 1 qr- .- «p . 100 nebco pace pom H.309 Ranked Species Fig. k0 plots. Species ranked by total per cent Species abundance hierarchy for 100m2 opening cover found in 4(400 subdivision plots) plots in June 1966. 82 I d‘ 10 3000 an. 1000 ‘- HHHomsn owauaaam M omconapm Eseanm a woSanImwuapn> maawpowq a muwaooocwfi owapcwflm a . opmmHsa wogwppwm. s mwmownu adomwppo> e «cocoonsn mHHamham a dowmobpoc «Hawucouom - a . n>m agocxcp a nsmmwao Kossr. e .mm Esownonhm 9 .dm mspoafifioz 0 .nm EnHHoane 9 .mm omacHHom 100 “1" d- unomoa.ssuaohwhe o condemns aHHHucoaom o .ESHHO%mflHHE mHHw£oHo>coo abnowhaom . «0335323 mapmuom o I anwannpa:owaowooz ammonnfioo com n>m neonxnb nomenonnn mHHmmhsm a «HHOMHHmeopnw mamoaosd ‘r- “b p . u a o . 1 1000 '1- 100 "‘ mamaon :ophmopw< minnows wosuomqo aHHomOpoow meant mnflnnhu msnr mfimceumpn mom 2:3 Eases masque nonowaam naunocmcwo conowfipfi - p a q 1 pupae 9500 new Adan? 4L. 0 Ranked Species Species abundance hierarchy for 0.1m2 opening plots in August 1966. Fig. me Species ranked by total per cent cover found in 128 plots. 84 .9» anaaouwpa o gamma cowonowwhe o 3.8ng aohwpnwm : Rummage sweat a I acuasnsa owmewooz a . Abm neonxcp o aHHomOpooa Nofisr o , momohnfioo wow. 0 mwaouaamfiSepaw «Hmonns< o spoon aHpraopom o . mansopwpa mom a .Qm mSQOfifiaoz o anodes nophmopw< . macnown wosuown 9 an? 3583 I scannhp m:£m_I a _ unasca Gopowunfi .' .wfiococmcwo nonomfinm_I ‘- 10:000 up ‘- up- 0 p p - p L A d 1 d u _ .u nu nu. 1. nu nu 1i nu 1. 1 po>oo anon nom.ddaoe Ranked Species Species abundance hierarchy for 1.0m2 opening Fig. no Species ranked by total per cent plots in August 1966. cover found in 50 plots. 85 ‘- 10.9000 1000 -1- ‘- 4r- 100 encoumpa Esafiomuha aopnowna wHHapaopom opme5>AEsHmnwo usasbao>noo Escowhaom .gm mspoafiaoz a 035.0 Ego :50 Vegan. o b .. .mn .goanoohm I . manage omwoavoz I a Banana Koszm I Hi gamma: .I o uncomonsa mHHmmh£m_I a manna£p_esommnho>.I o «dachwamfisoppw «Hmonnfi¢ I , . ammoamsoo mom I womanhm damoflomsq I.. 633303 K053» I See.» aaawpcopom I .mwmnopmpm mom I owncowp wozpowq.u endear? 25E I. manage nonowapw I made mugged?" I uneasy nopsnoaM¢.I aamnocwcwo aoaowwhw I ‘- P p 1 a 1 10 4- .3.30 ”:00 you .7909 L A 0 Ranked Species F180 0.. hierarchy for 10m2 opening Species ranked b total per cent § plots. (162 subdivision plots f. O. gust 196 Species abundance din 18 plots in Au cover foun 86 ‘- 109000 J- 1000 1 r- apoanpu uwHaKo a moawoppon «Haunnonom asazbaopnoo Escowhaom .pwb mwmnocmnwo monsowg o . nousownm «Haaunopom o noanwImonnfip wuamuom o .. o agaouamgno Kasai I a enemas 55.28.29 I q .. mapwwazp «0.39:5 I. o casewoCmo 890.28an I 0 .am sawfiomape I o . 253.3 xofizm I O ..H>m Euoggp . s 02.8995 Esfifiomdfle II a A? mspoazez. I a _ enemas» Esomwnno> I a cannon.” owmowuoz I o . ammopQEoo mom I. I. “Hfiomgood KQESM» 'I o spoon waawpnepom I o waaofiaaawfionnw wwmopoa<.u mwmcopmna com I mags «apnoea I an? mgohn I.. define»? mg? I ensues dophgonw¢.I mange Gonomwhw I uflanecmcmo nonmwdpw I F b L a d a 0 0 . 1 1.. 1P- - 1 qt— 100 9250 ”:00 some .7909 Ranked Species Species abundance hierarchy for 1001112 opening plots in August 1966. Fig. p. Species ranked by total per cent cover found in 4(400 subdivision plots) plots. 87 .. .Qm aconnc> . neboo 0:00 pom Adan? apowapm anwKo o anawaomaon aaaefisocnm o . manuaw mwowp< c cascaded Esoaflm o eaamH5>AESHspHo e monsomOLw wHprcOpom o “HHowsa ommpcwam o .Qm mwawcmp< . o .Leb mannecwcmo monsomg a wbwpwm owmowccE o OHwGHOflmwo Esowxapwa o esflaowwmsnpo sweat a . . a>m Gaonxnb o omdouwao esfiHOhfine a .mfimuwao Kefiar o mascoan sonuowq o Momma cowomowwne o . acaasmsfi owwowoez o . mwflomwwmflfiepam “Hmonpfi< o gopouocp mafiopm o wHHcmouoem Knead o mfimnocmaeo nonewfiafi o mszccm Goaowflpw mamas; :opzmosm< . aDHw mwcnohq o memondfioo mom scwnahu mzflr spoon waawucouom mwmneuwpa mom - - P p p . p P p . a 1 . . q q q . q m m m m 1 .. m 0 1 0 " I II I 'I I II I II I II I II I 'l I II ' II I I. Ranked Species Species abundance hierarchy for undisturbed fallow Fig. q. Species ranked by total per cent cover .0 73 6t 90 11 p m um J1 nun .11 A. 8a tan kw pr. 88 ‘- 10:000 1000 db 100 onfihamw Snaawa .Qm seasone> camnfiaammoufivw998%nflm .Qm Spacepow o mpwHooocaH owwpnwam o ESHH000HdHE mcHHw£o¢ a eflammfiz> measnnmm o oppchEmo_E:ficHnoq .9 mamannp Enomwnac> . .mm acpm¢ . quasapapce ccefiam a asasbaoinoo as: omhaom . L . . . u q a db 0 I 1 1 LO>OD ufioo how fldaofi 0 “L I II I.II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II Ranked Species Fig. q continued. ofiscwouhho Esowanme osfiamms ESwHec cmccuwpa Esaaomwpe mousewam waawpnopom mSHs>Ho>coo sssowhaom wfiwflaaapnm eGeHHm cam ESwHOQwLB o Esaflmmprm ESHLQE%mam o mamas msuoawficzy o wuwwaomaoa magmasomam . mwcwficeem :socxsa. a . mflccown wosuoag 89 ‘- 10,000 .1- 1000 4L- .4»- 100 ud- «p O . 1 AOwQE nomomowwae sppmflm mwnwn¢ apowapm ansHo wwaowawwwEepaw meOLQE¢ mGoomeDSQ mHHamhnm a>m dsoqup .mm mowcoae> Sna0uoou masonm mHHomouooe smear mannaoscmo coacmflpfi wzwflamu want mucosa coh%aoaw< waHSQSH omQOHUoE ammoaasoo mom mssccm Goacmflpm snoop wHkucepom gnaw mangoes wamSoprm com _ . 0 — oi 1 pe>oo ucmo new ”duos Ranked Species bundance hierarchy for 0.1m2 opening Species ranked by total per cent Species a er found in 128 plots lots in June 1967. Fig. r. P cov 90 “r 10,000 db 1000 .mm Escaaoahm .Qu oweufiaom msHS>Ho>coo endowmaom wanmfiw mwnwnd magmmas> woawpamm .Qm awpsnca< mswfioufimSpno Nessa pmeE Gomoaowsae .mwAOpmwmImmpsn sfiHemmwo mammwao Nessa 9aw> mwmcepwnmo scanned a 0 9 m 9 0 I a 9 0‘90 1r 100 ‘10,«- ‘- Oeso Q>m csonxcb mammm£p_fizomwppo> mascowp moppowg emceumpa Sawaomaae epOfinpm mflflmxo .mm mafisopo> wHHOkmewEopaw wflwoape< manam mapoawaez macacp Ezaaom«aa Enhance» msfioam mcfiHSQna owQOHpeE mfimcepwcwo soaowwaw wHHomOpoom KeEsm eaflfiahp mast spoon safiapsepom ammoamEoo aom msomea nonmmoam< snag magnoaq mfimCGpaam mom. b p a a 1 no>oo aceo pom fiance O ‘L . .. I'II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II Ranked Species Species abundance hierarchy for 1.0m2 plots in Species ranked by total per cent cover found June 1967. . in 50 pIOtS. Fig. 3. 91 onwaamw Snufiso onnwowmmo Esowxeawe Ranked Species Enownamaflb owwuawfim.. .Qm asflcwaom . .Qm Romeo a wnwnpawpcm onoflww . T t. w n a . w w . + n no nu nu Au. 1. O 0 no 1; m m 1 A 0 no>oo useo so.“ «upon. 1. . 0 " I II I-II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II Fig. 3 continued. 92 ‘- 10,000 .m- 1000 4|- 100 mnomwao Kossm a onwawnw Enanew a .Qn soanoao> o awaewfis> moasnawm . ‘— p A O . 1 o oasQwOAMMo Ezowxmasa . A>m agonxcp . oppsoaseo Ezaewaoq moaflahm meflacfloe< nasceflp eozuoeq wpwflaomaem «Hpcflzoomm mspfie appoHWHez wanaaw massed homes nomenommaa omcoumpa EsaaomHae sandman Ezomsnhc> anOMHHmeouaw wwmoapsd .am mwpmcoa¢ savanna efiflxxo Essencep masonm mceaoa_E9fiHomfiae eCHHSQSH omeofipcz mHmGeGQCmo :oaewflnfi «Haemopoow,xefisr czanamu wank manage coaemflafi emmcaQEoo mom mwmfiepwam mom snoop maaapCCpom anHe nwcnohq mamas; coahaoam< — d1 a ‘r- y. 1 a¢>oo usco pom Hence “ I II I'II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II J 0 Ranked Species Species abundance hierarchy for 10mg plots in June 1967. Opening Species ranked by total per cent . plots) plots. subdivision cover found in 18(162 Fig. t. 93 .1- 103000 .Qm nopm¢ EonsncmoncH Enfionnnemhnflo easemensm mwammhxm msHs>Ho>qoo Escommfiom wcpcewae efiaaasopom sawxnawpne encawm .Qm Escapeahm .ne> mamceoeceo sosuoeq .Qm Ezwcwhow .Qm cfiamnHpr eneman> Esfiwafic mafiaomfimspno Hefisr omneunaa Snoanm . --.._:,+--.... n L. ,1 ‘F' -‘r- O 1 1 1000 L¢>oo nice new ~d909 Au nv 1i 0 —b I II I‘Il I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II Ranked Species Fig. t continued. | .1- 10.000 1000 4+- mopcowam «fiaaunopom BE £39..an . .aa> mamderCco sosueeq a Sawaoucaflwe ecHHfl£o< a 0 .nm wowcoao> a mammeflp Esomsnao> . aches nomonommne . enumeoseo Enflpaaeq e .Qm unexposeo . sanwfim manead o usamwao Nessa . .an wwpecea< o spewfiouaca wwawH30eQm o Essence» eSanm a cmccpman Esarouaae c mfiaouwwmflsepaw mwmoanfid . unseen Enwfloafiae o mapfim szOHHHez 9 sandman moppowg o mpowaum mfiasxo o saaemoueom Keesm . emmeaqfioo com mwncepecwo :Daewflpw swoon eHHHpCcpom ecwflsmza cascapez enafiahp mafia mwmccpeam mom manque coacwwpw eDHm maCflbhA anode; coahmoaw< 4r «L- . u p q d - n? 1. 1. 0 “L I II I’Il I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II 100 ao>oo 9600 new Haas? Ranked Species Species abundance hierarchy for 100m2 opening plots in June 1967. Species ranked by total per cent found in 4(400 subdivision plots) plots. Fig. u. cover 95 109000 ecfinaaque ocoawm mascumwmIemasn manommeo Snowcfimaab omwucSHm wflaepwo encmez mowwobaos mHHflpnepom Hfiaemsa omspcwam mflmn0>aw mflEenucd caecflowpmo EgaanEhmwm .Qm wflpeHHOpm eczeawumaewafi> aflaepew mwawwfis> sensppmm .Qm Epofiaeahm afiesfiowamo Esowxmawe — b d a d and- ‘0- 0 . 1 1000 100 ao>oo psoo new 990. «p- H1909 q- 0 ‘L I II I-II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II Ranked Species Fig. u continued. APPENDIX C PLOTS OF REGRESSIONS OF PER CENT COVER OF MAJOR SPECIES OCCURRING IN AUGUST 1966 ON THE PER CENT COVER OF AMARANTHUS RETRO- FLEXUS THAT HAD OCCURRED IN THE SAME PLOTS IN AUGUST OF 1965 97 1004- 904.- :3 a 30" H + £0 70.. 32 a g 60"” 0 E31 g 50‘? O as g 40-- ‘4 g 5 .4- O 0 O .p 5 ac» . 0 ' . S m 10» . . . i0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1 Per Cent Cover of Amaranthps retroflexus in AuEfiat‘TSES. Fig. a. Regression of per cent cover of Pea compressa in Aug. 1965 on per cent cover of Amaranthus retroflexus in Aug. 1965 on 128 0.1m2 openings out in a first year Tallow field. . . 98 1004- “, 90~~ (O O) H . 80‘- 2? L a: G5 70...- H H 3 o 60‘- .p 0 O ‘< ‘50‘* N O 5 a, 40-- L. 3 a- O 30 0 U 'S o 20" O . $4 .3 1o- 9 .. .0 o '. . ° . O l l L l ' I W T , I r I H I io 20 so 40 so so 70 so so 100 Per Cent Cover of Amaranthus retroflexus in August 1965 Fig. b. Regression of per cent cover of Rumeg acetosella in Aug. 1966 on per cent cover of Amaranthus retrofiexus_1n Aug. 1965 on 128 0.1m2 openings cut‘in a first year fallow field. 99 I 1004 90...... 70‘... Per Cent Cover Potentilla recta Aug. 1966 :Ie 4H. i0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1 0 Per Cent Cover of Amaranthus retroflexus in August Iggo Fig. 0. Regression of per cent cover of Potentilla recta in Aug. 1966 on per cent cover of Amaranthus retroflexus in Aug. 1965 on 128 0.1m2 openings Efit in a first year fillow field. 100 1004- 90‘- 80-~° S 20 “on. Per Cent Cover Erigeron annuus Aug. 1966 : § 5 i. i '% ¢—-{ io 20 so 40 so so 70 so so 100 Per Cent Cover of Amaranthus retroflexus in August 1965— F18. d. Regression of per cent cover of Erigeron annuus in .Aug. 1966 on per cent9 cover of Amaranthus retroflexus in Aug. 1965 on 128 0.1m2 openings out in a _f1rst year Iallow fiCld. lOl 100+. 90*? :8 o: 80" H £25070" ‘¢ :3 60-L 03 c o :50” o a 9. Si 40-- n. p C :3 50-- o c) .9 fig 20 0' c» ‘4 0 g: 10 0° , . 02° . ° ... \ I. I I I I I «ac—W a r .. . r 1. i0 20 4o 50 60 70 80 90 100 Per Cent Cover of Amaranthus retroflexus in August ISSST Fig. e. Regression of per cent cover of Poa_p3atensis in Aug. 1966 on per cent cover of Amaranthus retroflexus in Aug. 1965 on 128 0.1m2 openings out in a‘fTFst year‘rallow field. 102 1004 '4 m 0 O O O I I I I I ‘ $ 53 ES 1 I I r ‘ 8. {)0 O o o O 0 o 0 1L choc o 9 . Itweae’fises¢ c8; . I I I I ' U I I I. i 10 20 so 40 so so 70 so so 100 Per Cent Cover Lactuca biennis Aug. 1966 as <3 I l H O I 0 GO Per Cent Cover of Amaranthus retroflexus in August 1965— Fig. f. Regression of per cent cover of Lactuca biennis in Aug. 1966 on per cent cover of Amaranthus retroflexus in Aug. 1965 on 128 0.1m2 openings cut in a first year fallow field. 1004- 904-- CD to 80‘- O5 H a; 70-1.- <13. . g 50..- H (S a so» ,2! 0 g 40". 3 . 3 sodL 0 ‘3 8 2°" . ‘ . 8 o (L 10'“? 0 Q90 9 (:00 9°? 0 :38060390 0° 10 20 so A A l l l ' I _uj 103 40 50 6O 70 80 1'5 90 10 Per Cent Cover of Amaranthus retroflexus in August 1965— Fig. g. Regression of per cent cover of'Lychnis EASE in Aug. 1966 on per cent cover of Amaranthus retroflexus in Aug. 1965 on 128 0.1m2 field . openings cut—in 5 first year fallow 104 :8 1001; a . H . 90.1-. to :3 4 . u m 80"“0 9 o '0'. 4' :1) . I. .5, 70%- IS 53 60.1- . g: 0 O s 1’ w 504-- *1 $4 a: p 40“» O O 9 . 0 g 00090.9 9 O 43 $3 0 O , h- 0 0.. I l 1 l . l I I I. I I I l I II 20 so 40 so so so. so so 100 Per Cent Cover of Amaranthus retroflexus in August 1960 Fig. h. Regression of per cent cover of‘Erigeron canadensis in Aug. 1966 on per cent cover of Amaranthus retroflexus in~ AUS- 1955 on 128 0.1m2 openings cut in a first year fallow field. HICHIGQN STRTE UNIV. LIBRQRIES my I Iflill |||1| “H | Ill fill I“ 1| H1! "WI 2 3 068 7536