NEW NETHERLANDS: A STUDY IN THE FAILURE OF THE DUTCH WEST INDIA COMPANY AS A COLONIZER Thesis for the Dam of M. A. MIG-{16AM STATE UNNERSITY Frederick P. Brakora 1956 umm}flurunflujmuwguynn MSU RETURNING MATERIALS: Place in book drop to LIBRARIES remove this checkout from —_ your record. FINES will be charged if book is returned after the date \ stamped below. ”p. SJ “ *nt' w .f .1. ‘ FM ‘3 lié? v" NOV 1 1 2912 New Netherlands: A Study in the Failure of the Dutch West India Company as a Colonizer by Frederick P. Eakora An Abstract of a Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Michigan State University East Lan sing, Michigan 1956 Approved ”EM [gm i,9;,,k~¢. partnent of Hfstéry I} (1/ £23.90 New Netherlands: A Study in the Failure of the Dutch West India Company as a Colonizer In the year 1609 the Dutch discovered what is now New York State. History records little of the activity in that area, which the hitch called New Netherlands, until 1624, and very little after that until 1629. In this brief work an attenpt is made to throw a little light on the period from 1609 to 1629 and show that there were indeed sig- nificant events that history has largely passed over. The events of this period go a long way toward explaining why the Dutch created the Patroonships which are such a prominent part of the history of the Hudson River Valley. Hmry Hudson discovered the river which bears his name and gave the Dutch claim to New York State while he was sailing in search of the Northwest Passage for the Dutch East India Company. His discovery, however, failed to stir the innginations of the Dutch. After a lapse of some five years the Dutch realized that England and France would soon lay claim to the whole of the North American Continent if they did not hasten to make their claim secure with a population. In the year 1611+ the area was rediscovered. The discoverers were given a monOpoly in trade to last for three years until the md of 1617 as a reward. A small but valuable trade in furs was maintained. The trade and activity were kept small by design of the States General. They desired to maintain complete dominence over the area so that when the Dutch West India became a reality, New Netherlands could be turned over to it. It was the intention of the States for some years prior to the first settlement in l62h to allow only a few persons to search for wealth in New Netherlands. The development of the whole of Dutch possessions in the western Hemisphere was to be the function of the powerful Nest India Company. This Company, chartered in 1621, was primarily a trading organi- zation. This fact had unfortunate consequences for New Netherlands because it had little in the way of easily obtained wealth to offer except fer the fur trade. As a result the West India Company lost interest. So much so that by 1629 the colony could be considered a substantial failure. In 1624.the first settlement was made. Fbr'a year or more the prospects for success looked bright. An involvement with the Indians in 1625 forced all the settlers to retreat to Manhattan Island. On Manhattan the colonists were not permitted to own land fur the Island was the property of the Company. This, together with the hardships endured, discouraged new immigration and, in fact, caused a certain number of colonists to return to the Old werld. With almost everything confined.to the Island of Manhattan and the fur trade reduced to'a mere triCkle, the Company decided to devote its energies elsewhere in the New WOrld. But in order to retain control of New Netherlands, it was imperative'Uhatzmore peOple be induced to settle there. As a consequence the Dutch established a system.known as Patroonships in 1629. The Patroonships were huge grants of land.together with virtual feudal rights made to persons who would settle at least 50 peOple on.the grant. This was an adaptation of the Captaincies which the Portuguese found successful in settling the Mederia Islands. The Patroonships were an expedient employed to stave off complete failure in the colonization of New Netherlands. New Netherlands: A Study in the Failure of the Dutch West India Company as a Colonizer by Frederick P. Brakora A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan 1956 Approved Department of History Table of Contents Introduction Chapter I ............................................... 1 Chapter II ...............................................13 Chapter III ........................ ...... .................33 Chapter IV ...............................................58 Chapter V .............................. ..... ............70 Conclusion ................... ...... ......................8h Bibliographical n'oteOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ..... O ....... .88 INTRODUCTION With the exceptim of one, all the colonies that made up America in 1776 can trace their histories back to their founding with a certain degree of precision. In almost all cases except that of New Netherlands, there are memoirs or records that more or less clearly establish the history of the early settlements. In no case are the first years of settlement as confused and neglected as in New Netherlands. Details of what happened in New Netherlands prior to 1629 are difficult to find. There is even a question of the exact date on which the first settlers arrived. Most historians writing about early New York pass over the years from 1609 to 1629 in a paragraph or two in which they point out that there was sane trade carried on between 1615 and 1620 and that in 1621 the West India Company was chartered to take over the responsibility for colonizing the New World in the Dutch intereSt. The event of Manhattan Island's purchase from the Indians is discussed without providing an exact date. A statement to the effect that it took place in the Spring of 1626 is made and from there the discussion moves cm to the Patroonships. The reasm for such a sketchy treatment, it must be pointed out, is understandable. Material covering the period has come to light only in the relatively recent years. Many of the most important sources, of course, have been buried in the National Archives of the Netherlands. And what is more important, a goodly part of the Dutch West India Company papers covering its activities in these years were destroyed by a short-sighted Minister of Colonies in 1821. This work is intended to show the importance of these early years and indicate to some degree at least why the Dutch colony adopted the curious institution known as the Patroonships. These neglected years in a large sense helped determine the destiny of the colony. ‘He are interested in.what happened before 1629 and why. It is interesting to speculate on.what the fate of the Dutch West India Company night have been.had the New Netherlands settle- ment more closely net expectations. But more interesting is the speculation on the fate of New Netherlands had the story that is to be told not been true. New Netherlands: A Study in the Failure of the Dutch West India Company as a Colonizer CHAPTER I From the year of discovery, 1609, until 1621+ the area claimed by the Dutch in North America remained unsettled. During this approximate interval of time the English had planted colonies at Jamestown and Plymouth. The Dutch territory, reported to be of excellent quality for farming, renained uninhabited for fifteen years except for a handful of traders interested only in furs and easily-obtained wealth. At home, a group of refugees petitioned in vain to be transported to the New World to settle under the rule of the Dutch. But the rulers of the Netherlands were not ready to take such decisive action. They were awaiting the outcane of far-reaching plans. The plans involved the creation of a Dutch West India Company. Even before its creation, the specter of the Dutch West India Company hovered over the Dutch claims discouraging constructive activity. While the plans were being developed, the Dutch Government refused to permit free access to New Netherlands, to either traders or colonists, except on specified conditions. Under careful restric- tion a small amount of trade was allowed. The reason for the close control was that from the time of discovery there was agitation for the formation of a commercial monopoly vested with complete juris~ diction over the Western Hemisphere. It was to be modeled after the Dutch East India Company which held sole rights to all trade in the last Indies. Until such time as the new company was formed restric- tions were placed on all activities in the New world in a manner that precluded the formation of everything resembling a colony. The Dutch during this period relied on comercial enterprises to expand their colonial holdings. Ii‘hey had been exceedingly success- ful in the Far last where the East India Company had carved out an empire and at the same time returned huge profits to its stockholders. Why not apply such a successful method to the Western Hemisphere? this they intended to do even 1: development of mm was delayed. It seemed that the colony of low lethsrlands was always secondary to some cc-arcial consideration. The Dutch slain to New Netherlands was based on the voyage of Henry Hudson who sailed for the Dutch East India Company. The East India Company was chartered in 1602 for the purpose of trading to the last Indies and the Orient. After a few very rewarding years the directors, seeking to shorten the route to the source of their wealth, sent out a free-lance Inglis]: sailor in search of the illusive northwest passage. The Inglishnn, Henry Hudson, with a mixed crew of hglish and Dutch seamen set out in the year 1609. Is failed to find the sought-after passage, but instead he gave the Dutch their claim to the Hudson River valley and what later became known as low Netherlands . Colonization could have begun shortly after 1609 because the Dutch considered Hudson's voyage as the basis of their claim. This claim was not disputed for some years to come. That they did consider ‘ I .g: - e , _ ‘ ‘ . . . ‘ . this voyage as giving title to the lands is substantiated by many references in the records of the States General. In 1631l- the West India Company referred to it in one of its many petitions and requests to that body. 011 this occasion the records declared ”that the said river and adjacent countries had been discovered in the year 1609, at the cost of the East India Company, before any Christian had ever been up the said river as Hudson testifies, who was then in the service of the said Company for the purpose of discovering the northwest passage to China."1 Other references placed this fertile land between #0 and 50 degrees latitude, thus nking it unmistakably the location of New Netherlands or New York . Upon his return Hudson revealed that he had indeed found a bountiful land. As was custo-ry for a skipper returning from a voyage of discovery, Hudson presented his report, first to his sponsors and then, at the appointed tine, to the States General. His report left no mistake but that he had discovered an excellent country for colon- isation. "i‘he land is the finest for cultivation that I ever in w 11:. set foot upon, (a 13333 schoonste _la_nd;t_ g 33 m 2.1:. 33.5 915 in £522 £3 12333 33393)." In 1621:, the sane Dutch historian who quoted Hudson wrote this in addition to Hudson's description: "He found there also vines and yapes, pumpkins and other fruits; from all of which there is sufficient reason to conclude, that it is a pleasant and fruitful country."2 But the directors of the East India Company 1"Acts of the States General", in Docunents Relative to the Colonial Hist of State of New York, WWE,E vols. mm: 35%)??an “rennin-ween n. 2. Col. Docs. 2John De Last A Description of the Nest 13:11:? (fe-yden 1621;), in .1. Franklin Janeson: ed., Narratives of New Netherlands, 1609-1661} , (New York 1909), p. 19. Hereafter oifid De Last, Narr, New Neth. Also found in New York Historical Society Collections ml)7§econd Series I, 282-31'6'.‘ “'- did not seem impressed, nor did the Dutch governnent. As a result the North American discovery remained a dead issue for five years. The reason for the lapse of five'years is not known. It cannot be said that the reason for lapsed time was due to the bad relations between the Dutch and the Spanish. The two nations had been at war since the middle of the 16th Century, it is true, but following 1609 they were, technically at least, at peace, having concluded a, twelve year truce in that year. There was another reason. What it was no one knows. Five years after the discovery, in lélh, the area about the Hudson River was "rediscovered”, but only after the Dutch government offered a substantial reward to‘discoverers of new lands. It must have been amply clear to the Netherlanders that if they did not stake out claim in North America, soon there would be nothing left to claim. They were aware of the Inglish in Virginia, for Hudson had reported their presence. Others also, such as the Dutch historian Yon Hetern, and even the records of the States General, indicated that there was concern over the Inglish occupation of the continent. As early as 1611 Von letern wrote concerning the detention of Hudson in England on his return from America, that ”it was thought probable that the Inglish theuelves would send ships to explore further the said river.” Von Hetern said that the English .had attempted to press Hudson into their service since he was, after all, an Englishmn.3 Such indications must have weighed heavily on the statesmen of the Netherlands as they plotted the destinies of their country in the New World. 3amnne1 Von notern, nigger. and Dutch Wars 91; Events, (1611), In Narr. 1e! Neth., pp. 8-9. Hereafter cited Von Hetern, Narr. 1e! Neth. To get claim established in America it was imperative that some sort of incentive be provided to encourage investment in projected trips to America. (tents of monopoly rights to trade in any newly discovered areas seemed to be the best solution. The precedent for such grants had been well and profitably established prior to this date by the last India Company. The amount of wealth that accrued to the United Provinces as a result of that Company's exploits is well known. It was logical, then, to presume that a similar arrange- nent would be advantageous in the New World . In this age of mercantilism the enphasis seemed to be in favor of permitting private enterprise and the profit motive to direct the energies of nations as well as men. If the state could provide the climate within which these factors worked themselves out the most satisfactorily, than it was performing its functions in the ideal unner. The Dutch believed that the promise of nonopoly in trade provided the most conducive atmosphere for such activity as was required by these circumstances . Accordingly, on the 28th of lurch, 161‘!L , the' statesmen of the Netherlands fulfilled their function by passing an act which provided that: "Whosoever any new passages, havens, countries or places shall nowand henceforth discover, shall alone resort to the same, or cause them to be frequented for four voyages . " The discoverers were protected from interlepers by a provision that decreed: ”Confiscation of the goods and ships where- with the contrary attempt'be made, am a fine of fifty thousand Netherlands Ducats, to the profit of the aforesaid finder and discoverer."5 his lo 993;. DOCB., I, so 5Ibid., p. 8. Encouraged by such effective protection, the merchants did not hesi- tate to assume the risk of sending out their ships, perhaps dreaming of discoveries equal in wealth to those of the East India Company, or even those of Spain. Before the year l6lh ended, an assooation of Amsterdam merchants was able to seize upon the tempting rights granted by the law. In the same year, two ships returned simultaneously, one named the rortune, ended by Hendrick Christiansen of Cleef, the other , the Tiger with Adrian Block as captain, both of which were in the employ of a New Netherlands company. The reports of the two skippers to the States General revealed that they had revisited the place to which Hudson had been only five years before. Yet these voyages were considered the basis for claim of discovery as required by the law of 1611+. No reason was ever given as to why the original discovery of Hudson was not honored in this case . It does seem probable though that there was opposition to the expansion of the East India Company‘s territory. As early as 1602 there was agitation for a new ouspany to control the Western Huisphere. It had many strong advocates. Be that as it my, the lands christiansen and Block visited "in America betwoen New France and Yirginia...in the latitude of to degrees to 145 degrees" were unmis- takably the lands discovered by Hudson. In spite of that, ”on the llth of October, 1611;, the States General granted those associated ship- owners the extensive privileges of trading to the 'New Netherlands ' . . . for three years more consencing on January 1, 1615 ," or until four voyages had been capleted.7 ' 61bid., p. 10. 7NFL-3301a“ Wassenaer, Historiche Verhael (Auterdam, 1621-1632) , in _N_. 1. Hist. Collections (1819?, New Series , II, 358-9. Not found in Narr. 1!! Hath. Hereafter cited Wassenaer, N. Z° Hist. Collections. This little company proved to be a more stop-gap measure while more grandiose plans involving the future of the Dutch in America were brought to fruition. As early as August of 1611;, two months before the charter of the New Netherlands Company was granted, plans were under consideration for the formtion of a second great commer- cial monopoly to be called the West India Company. It alone was to have the authority to trade and colonize in the Western Hemisphere. Although the idea for a second company had been conceived by William Hssolinx as early as 1602 nothing was done about it. The idea was revived in l6lh and proposed to the States General. Deliberations on the proposal spread over the next seven years . The charter was completed in mid-year, 1621. But the Company did not commence operations for another two seasons due to difficulty in raising the necessary capital. During this time the New Nether- lands Company carried on its activities and mintained a tenuous sort of hold on the North American possession. Its exclusive privileges lasted three years after which the trade there was opened to all. Of the activities of the New Netherlands Company very little is known. The Dutch have always been very meticulous about record- keeping and the New Netherlands Company was no exception. Careful accounts had been kept of all its transactions and activities during its brief existence, but unfortunately the documents relating to it as well as those pertaining to the Amterdam Chamber of the West India Company for the first seven years of its existence were sold as waste paper by the Minister of Colonies in 1821. Consequently, all that remains are a few references in the Acts of the States General and some of the proceedings of the provincial governments of Holland and West Friesland. With these scanty primary sources only a few facts can be established. The most significant fact about this organization, for our purposes, was that it was exclusively a trading company operating on a limited monopoly charter. The exclusive rights lasted from January 1, 1615, to the last day of 1617 after which it had to face the hazards of competition. During that brief period no permanent colony or installation was attempted. Colonization was to be a function of the proposed West India COW, then in the planning stage. The participants in the New Netherlands Company later indicated a willingness to promote colonization if the States General would assist them, but that was not until after their exclusive rights had expired. It was obvious that to attempt a colony at the New Netherlands Company's expense would be to no avail during the short period of three years. The cost of such an under- taking spread over such a short space of time would. not be feasible, even if the States General would permit it. From a business point of view it did not make sense. The Cellpany, therefore, devoted its energies toward extracting as large a return as possible, which meant keeping fixed costs to a bare minimum. What other course could be expected from a business organization? New Netherlands Company was nde up of 17th Century businessmen who certainly were not altruists; rather they had a keen eye for profits. The scope of the New Netherlands Company activities, as a result, was confined to the fur trade. For this purpose trading posts were located.where contact could be made with the natives. No time was wasted in this respect. De Last noted that "in the year 1615, a redoubt or fort was erected on the river and occupied by a small garrison." The location of this installation.was in the heart of the thioan Country, which Hudson had reported to be fertile and which was inhabited by friendly Indians, at the approximate location of the present city of Albany. The fort was later reconstructed and called Hort Orange. It was the mnst promising settlement in all of New Netherlands. At the Fort, there was what De Last called "a great traffic in the skins of beavers, otters, foxes, bears, minke...and the like.”9 Other centers of trade were also established at Manhattan Island and on the Delaware River, as well as several other locations that were visited periodically by sailing vessels, but none was the equal of Fort Orange. After three years the company‘s monopoly came to an end. Although the New Netherlands Company continued to operate in the area they soon had competitors. Two other groups of Amsterdam merchants were attracted by the profits realized from the fur trade. But the combined operation of all the companies remained very small. 'When the States General ordered the area cleared they brought all equip- ment and people home in three ships. This trading operation.mdght have been greater had there been 8De Last, Narr. New Neth., ppo38-9. 9Ibid., p. 1&8. lO colonists in the area. At no time during the period from 1613+ to 1620 can it be said that there were not available colonists to be sent to the New world. Since about 1607 there had been residing at Leyden a group of Brownist exiles from England who had repeatedly petitioned for transportation to New Netherlands. When the pleas of the group to the Lords went unheeded their cause was espoused by the merchants of Amterdam who besought the Prince of Orange to inter- cede in their behalf before the Lords at The Hague. The merchants, participants in the New Netherlands Company, sent the following petition to the Prince in 1620: low it happens, that there is residing at Leyden a certain English Preacher, versed in the hitch language, who is well-inclined to proceed thither to live, assuring the petitioners that he has the means of inducing over four hundred families to accompany him hither, both out of this country and England, provided they would be guarded and preserved from all violence on the part of other potentates , by authority and under the protection of your Princely Excellency and the High and Mighty Lords States General in propagation of the true and Christian religion, in instruction of the Indians in that country in true teaching, in converting them to the Christian Faith, and thus, through the mercy of the Lord, to the greater glory of this country's government to plant there a comonwealth, all under the order and sound. of your grincely Excellency and the High and Mighty Lords States General.1 The House of Orange apparently looked with favor upon the idea, but the States General would have none of it. The petition was forwarded to the Lords for immediate action. The disposition made of it there reflects in part the relationship between the House of Orange and the States General who were fearful of the rising influence of the former. The proposition was postponed on several occasions and was finally rejected in smy language on April 12, 1620, one month to the day from the time it was sent to the Prince of Orange. 011 this 1°"Petition to the Prince of Orange", 35. I- 93;. Docs" 1. 22-27- 11 Saturday their High mghtinesses decreed that the ”petition of the Directors of the New Netherlands Company, that they, for the peopling of the said Island my be assisted by two ships of war is again 11 rejected.” From this day forward nothing is heard of the Drownists in the Acts of the States General. The Lords never formally declared the reason for their rejection. An explanation of the action is suggested, however, by one of the historians of the time. During the decade of the 1620's he wrote: Nor did the States General look with more favor upon the application which the Amsterdam Company made to them on the 12th of February, 1620 in behalf of the Brownists at Leyden. The Statemen of Holland by this time entertained too large and ambitious design to listen to the modest petition of the Amsterdam. Company. They had in view the establishment of a great commercial monopoly, whose concentration of capital and energy would not only direct the colonization of the Dutch discoveries in America, but also assist the States in crushing the pride of Spain. They, therefore, finally resolved on the 11th of April, 1620 to reject the prayers of the memerialists, and thus rejected the Puritans soon afterwards left their home at Leyden 1Band embarked in the Mayflower under the banner of St. George. The seriousness of this error on the part of the States General was lPPreoiated later in the history of the Dutch Colony in North America. The refusal to transport any of the four hundred families denied the colony what it was to need most-~populaticn. These four hundred families amounted to more than the total population in 1630. They might have altered the course of history in the Dutch colony. Had they been transported to New Netherlands the patroonships might never have come into existence. There would have been no need for them. If there had been a large and loyal population in New Netherlands llIbid., I, ah. assenaer, N. !. Hist. Collections, Second Series, II, 359. there would have been no need to grant huge tracts of land to masters who would promise, as a condition of‘the grant, to bring fifty peeple to settle. Lack of population plagued New Netherlands all through its history. In 1650 the governor of the colony would have welcomed with open arms such a stalwart group as the Brownists. At that time "the governor, Peter Stuyvesant, welcomed refugees from New Haven, whether 'noble or ignoble, freeman or slave, debtor or creditor, yea to the lowest criminal includedl"13 About what might have been one can only speculate. However, without the consent of the States General nothing could be done. Their refusal spelled the end of’the idea. The States had no intention of allowing anyone to interfere with what they intended to be the Nest India Company's function. As a consequence, in 1620, twelve years after the discovery of New Netherlands, not a single Dutch citizen resided there. And what is more, no one would live there until 1621+ when the West India Company was finally able to deliver a small group of thirty families. This groupzmight have made the total population in 162h.in New Nether- lands in the neighborhood of LOO families instead of a meager thirty, had the Dutch been willing toqact. However, they favored waiting upon the west India Company. 133. G. Fisher, Men, Women and Manners g3 gglonia; Times, 2 vols. (Philadelphia, 1898), Vol. II, Chapter 8. As quoted in Curtis Nettels, Roots 2; American Qiyilization (New Ybrk, 19h7), p. 201. 13 CHAPTER II Before the story of New Netherlands colonization begins an analysis should be made 'of the organization that was to carry it out. The new company which the States General provided with a charter in 1621 was outwardly similar to other. Joint stock companies of the Seventeenth Century. In the beginning it was intended to be primarily a conercial trading company like the others, but into its structure, either wittingly or unwittingly, the States General incorporated a feature which enabled it to deviate in later days fron its primary intent and begin a vigorous buccaneering of the Spanish Rain. The Conpany conenced its activities in the peaceful pursuit of coloniz- ing New Netherlands. Shortly after this modest enterprise was launched it became apparent that it would not yield sufficient wealth to Justify a place of prime importance among West India Conpany ventures. Consequently, the Company turned to freebooting. It was for buses.- neering,not trade,that the Company became noted. In this chapter evidence will be offered in an attenpt to show that the West India Company was intended to be principally a comercial and colonizing organization. The decision to abandon colonization was forced on the directors of the. company by two things, the lack of inediate profits from its newly founded settlements in the New World and pressure fro: the States General to assist in a more direct campaign against the hated nations of the Iberian Peninsula. Presently, the Company was persuaded to attack the Portuguese in Brazil from whence a campaign could be conducted against the lucrative Spanish trade. This 1h they did by their own admission in response to the pressures of profit and governmental persuasion. In analyzing the Company's charter and the documents concerning the deliberations that led up to it, we shall see that the stated objectives were trade and colonization. When negotiations for the fonnation of the Company first began there was already an expressed fear along the Dutch of their complete exclusion from the North Alerican continent by the British and French. By 1620 it was clear that if territory was to be held in the New world the Company which was to govern it must be completed. There was also the important consideration of the expiration of the truce with Spain which had been signed in 1609. It was due to expire in 1621. The Twolve Year Truce was a brief respite in the conflict that had raged betwun the Dutch and their Spanish overlords since 1566. Attempts by Philip II to centralize the adninistration of the Nether- lands threatened to deprive the cities and the nobles of their tra- ditional privileges. Increases in taxes, enforcement of Catholicism upon an unwilling population, and objections to the person of Philip hinelf led to a revolt which ultimtely resulted in the unification of the seven northern provinces of the Netherlands under the House of Orange. Although the House of Orange had been the rallying force and had largely led the revolt, the resulting government was not a monarchy, but a republic. The seven provinces declared their independence of Spain in 1581. From that time the United Provinces found themselves on the defensive against Philip II and his son who succeeded him, 15 Philip III, both of whom.refused to recognize the independence of their ferler vassals. After Philip II died in 1598 the war continued until 1609, when both sides, weary of the long struggle, consented to a. truce of twelve years duration. Now it was to expire in 1621. By that time the Thirty Years war had broken out and the Dutch antagonism toward Spain was merged with that devastating conflict. Thus, as 1621 approached the States General needed to organize its affairs in the New World to allow more time for themselves to deal with the European situation. The States General had found that their East India interests had been well taken care of by the East India Company. Consequently, they hurried to form a second similar organization for the western half of the world. In these two great organizations diplomacy was linked with trade in the exPectation that the interests of the trading companies and the policies of the States General for colonies would coincide. This was in keeping with the Dutch political philosophy which a recent writer has characterized in the following way: Capitalistic it certainly was and its imperialism was by no means confined to America, Asia, or Africa, but sought to penetrate and meter Europe as well as distant lands. Everywhere and always the sole concern of Seventeenth Century Dutch capitalism was ' profit mking' , whether under the Netherlands flag or that of some other nation or even under the black flag of piracy.... Gold was their sole aim and many did not hesitate to sell Spain amunition and war equipment that, a few days later, might be used against Netherlands' towns and troops. A popular story is told of a sea captain who said that 'he would sail into hell and trade with the devil were it not that his sails might catch fire.'1 The organization constructed to carry out Dutch policies was certainly given the wherewithal to accomplish the objectives for which it was intended. It was given a commercial monopoly over half the 1Bernard H. M. Vlekke, Evolution 91 the Dutch Nation. (New York, l9h5), pp. 179-180. Hereafter cited Vlekke, Dutch Nation. 16 earth, power to make treaties and alliances, administer justice, form and maintain governments, keep armies and fortifications, but above all else it was charged with increasing trade and commerce. In the event that the Company became embroiled in international difficulties, or if the nation required the services of its land and sea forces the charter provided the necessary machinery for carrying out the national will. But the West India Company was first and foremost a conmercial organization. Wassenaer suggested this when he declared that the States General "had in view the establishmmt of a grand commercial monopoly, whose concentration of capital and energy would not only direct the coloniza- tion of the Dutch discoveries in America, but would also assist the States in crushing the pride of Spain."2 This statement indicates the dual natives of the organization. Most writers dwell on "crushing the pride of Spain" to the utter disregard of the primary motive as stated by Wassenaer and the documents relating to the company. From the above statement it is impossible to say how the "crushing" was to take place. It nay be that commercial competiticm was the means. It is fairly obvious that further documentation is needed. However, the above indicates a point worth making and that is that no matter what the source, the motive of the Dutch West India Company was not solely to "crush the pride of Spain." And it is significant here, as well as in what is to follow, that commerce and trade are always emphasized far more than the other. In fact, the other untive is often only implied. 2Wessenaer, fl. 3;. Hist. Collections (Second Series), II, 359. 17 The absence of any declaration against the Spanish monarch in the deliberations prior to the grant of the charter seems to be conspicuous. On July 21, l6lh,when the Lords consented to consider the proposal for such a company, the following resolution was read into the records : Read a remonstrance of diverse traders of these provinces in substance for the formation and erection in this country of a General Company for the Vest Indies, the Coast of Africa, and the Straits of Magellan, without prejudice to the East India Company.... Resolved, that the deputies present do advise with the principals on the aforesaid remonstrance, in order that they may on this day four weeks hence send some of their merchants hither, with when their High lightinesses may thoroughly examine the matters contained in the aforesaid petitions....3 The merchants presented their arguments as called upon from tin to time during the next seven years . They had pointed out on a number of occasions that such a company was the best means "for promotion of commerce and interests of the country...being laudable and advan- tageous for the country and its inhabitants." The charter itself is the most convincing evidence of why the Company was originally established. The tenor of the document If is indicated by its preamble: Be it known that we, noticing that the prosperity of this country and the welfare of its inhabitants consists principally in navigation and trade, which from time imemorial has been carried on by this country with good fortune and blessing with all countries and king- dom: and desiring the aforesaid inhabitants not only be maintained in their fonser navigation, comerce and trade, but also that their conerce may be increased as much as possible, especially in con- formity with the treaties, alliances, conventions and covenants concerning commerce and navigation formerly made with other princes, republics and nations, which we intend shall be punctually kept and observed in all their parts and finding by experience that without the canon help, and means of a general company no profitable business can be carried on protected and maintained in parts hereafter designated on account of the great risk from pirates, extortion and the like, which 31'. z. 993;. Docs., I, 7. “‘Resglutions of the States of Holland and West Friesland", Ibid., p. . 18 are incurred on such long and distant voyages: we therefore, for many other and different pregnant reasons and considerations also thereunto moving, after mature deliberation of council, and for very pressing causes have resolved that the navigation and commerce in the West Indies, Africa, and other countries hereafter designated, shall henceforth not be carried on otherwise than with the common in the West Indies, Africa, and other countries hereafter designated, shall henceforth not be carried on otherwise than with the common united strength of the merchants and inhabitants of this country and that to this end there shall be established a general company which on account of our great love for the commonweal and in order to conserve the trade and welfare of the inhabitants of this country, we will maintain and strengthen with out help, favor and assistance, so far as the present state and condition of this country will in any way admit, and for that purpose furnish with a proper charter and endow with the privileges and exemptions hereafter enumerated....5 The question of the Company's original purpose must be considered somewhat further. There are a great many historians who contend that the West India Company was created solely to make war against Spain. The directors of the Company never indicated such a motive either in the charter or correspondence relating to it. The charter's preamble dispels such a belief as do the documents that follow. Although what follows is, in a sense, ahead of the story and brings in events that properly belong in a later chronological period it is necessary that the point be made in spite of the violence to the chronology. There are two documents that must be explained at this time which relate to the opposition of the west India Company to a proposed truce with Spain in the year 1629 and again at a later date. The first document was dated OctOber 23, 1629,and was addressed by the Assembly of the XIX, the Directors of the west India Company, to the States General. The document elaborates in detail why the Company's financial position required the war to be continued so that the plunder of Spain's ships and possessions might continue. This is 5"Cherter granted by the High and Mighty Lords the States General to the west India Company," Ren. Bow. MSS. p. 89. Hereafter cited "Charter". For some reason the WeSt India Company Charter does appear in _N_. I. 993... Docs. 19 not the part that is important to us at this time. What is important is a paragraph inserted in the document reviewing the organization of the Company and its purpose. It is largely self-explanatory and reads as follows: Your High Nightinesses are aware, and it is not unknown to us, that this Company was in the comsncement, designed principally to increase trade and con-arcs, without which the great multitude of season bestowed by God on this country cannot be employed, and all occupations mintained in continual action and prosperity; that also, those who supposed themselves most conversant with this trade, were of the opinion that the West India Countries were not so exposed to the attacks of our enemies the Spaniards and Portuguese, but that trade could be carried on with sundry nations and people; colonists transported, and plantations of various products promoted, from which advantages could be derived equal to those our aforesaid enemies have realized since many years, to the strengthening con- siderably of the King of Spain's finances. And in case of delay or ill success, it was expected to make good a portion of the loss, by going to Punta del Rey for salt; but in consequence of the tedious negotiations with the Northern Quarter, we are entirely out off by the enemy from the salt trade at the Punta ; and as regards the general trade, experience has now made us wiser, and shown that the trade with those nations and people, who still remin indepen- dent of the King of Spain, is very meager and trifling; and that the countries, yet uninvaded, are for the most part of little consequence and unproductive, or if good and fruitful, are very difficult of cultivation, especially for our people, who being unaccustomed to so hot a clients can with great difficulty betake themselves to agriculture; and being unprovided with slaves, and not used to the employment of then, cannot, like the Spaniards and Portuguese, supply through others , their own insufficiency. Moreover, the colonizing such wild and uncultivated countries, demands more inhabitants than we can well supply; not so much through lack of population, in which our provinces abound, as from the fact, that all who are inclined to do any sort of work here, procure enough to eat without any trouble: and are therefore, unwilling to go far from home on an uncertainty: to this my be added, the doubt of being able to protect it, unless a greater and heavier expense than the returns are worth that my be derived from thence. But in order that you, High and Mighty, my be correctly informed herein, and understand the situation of the countries yet uninvaded by our enemies , we shall explain to you more particularily the entent and condition th eof, from one end of our boundries in the West India to the other. 6"Asseubly of m to States General", 001:. 23: 1529, E- I- 99.1.- DO0.0, I, 39"1‘00 . 20 The document then goes on to elaborate on the theme of the last statement. The second document is similar to the first; in fact, it repeats verbatim much of the preceding document, but it has a significant addition. The document is dated June 10, 1633,and is addressed to the provincial government of Holland. After reciting what has been previously noted, the document includes the following: Thus, your Great Mightinesses see what remains, within such great limits, in the West Indies, open to the Company for trade or cultivation; whereof, from the commencement of our administration, we preferred to proceed in a warlike manner against the common enemy.... But this prosecution of war, instead of commerce, has not been undertaken by us, on our own mere motion, but principally by the advice of the High and Mighty Lords States General, and the concurrence of his Serene Grace, the Prince of Orange, for your Great Mightinesses will well remember, that from the very inception of the Company, we have all been solicited.by their High Mightinesses' Commissioners, not only to undertake some hostile expedition against the enemy, but even to dispatch our fleet to reinforce that which a short time before had been ordered out under the command of Admiral L'Hermite, and to send the ships we had then by us ready equipped in the Zuyder Zee, which from good motives and with their High.Mightinesses' concurrence, were dispatched to Bahia de Todos los Sanctos. From these beginnings have we proceeded farther and farther into war; and undertake, with their High Mightinesses' advice and the approbation of his Serene Grace, divers expeditions which, to the astonishment of the universe, have been crowned, from time to time, with such success; and neglected to plant colonies and to settle the countries, from which as great trade might have followed as we at present possess, or in all prdba- bility, could speedily establish.7 The above citations indicating the nature of the Company, as originally intended by the Directors and coincides with what has been said about the nature of the Dutch philosophy. Merchants do not ordinarily engage in enterprises for purposes other than to make profits, especially 17th Century Dutch merchants. Privateering was certainly outside the scope of commerce with which the merchants of the Netherlands were so familiar. Persuasions and assurances of profit were necessary 7"Remonstrance of the West India Company to the States of Holland", June 10, 1633, Ibid., I, 6h-7. 21 to induce than to embark on such a hazardous course. The merchants protested that "from.the very inception of the Company, we have been solicited by their'High.Mightinesi Commissioners, not only to under- take some hostile expedition against the enemy, but even to dispatch our fleet to reinforce that which a short time before had been ordered out under the comnd of Admiral L'Hermite." The capital necessary to launch this enterprise was obtained from sale of shares to the general public and by a contribution from the Lords of The Hague. ...all the inhabitants of this country, and also of other countries, shall be notified by public posting of notices written ‘within the month after the date hereof that they may be admitted into this company during five months from.the first of July of this year, 1621, and that they may pay the money they wish to inrest in three payments: to wit, one third at the expiration of the aforesaid five months and the other two thirds within the next three years, unless the aforesaid general assembly shall find it necessary to extend the time.... To establish confidence in the venture, and indicate the good will of the States General toward it, the Lords committed themselves and the national treasury to "assist the Company with a sum.of ten hundred thousand guilders ’to be paid in five years...provided... that with half the aforesaid sum.shall receive and bear profit and risk in the same manner as the other participants in the Company." The one million guilders represented roughly one seventh of the total stock in the Company, and was a very substantial vote of confidence. Investors were protected, at least in part, from.bad management and poor Judgment on the part of the company's directors. Any losses 8"Charter", Ron. Bow. 1583., p. 103. 91b1de, PP. 109-1].le 22 sustained by a given chamber placed the directors' investment in Jeopardy. The hazards and uncertainty of trade in the 17th Century trade required such a provision if sufficient stockholders were to be found. The organizers of the company, therefore, found it advis- able to insert the following in the charter: And if it should happen that in one chamber or another any of the directors should get into such a situation that he could not mks good what was entrusted to him for his administration and in consequence thereof any loss should occur, said loss shall be charged against the money which such directors have in the Company, which (investment) is also especially pledged for his administration.lo Such protection was imperative as a protection against unforseen losses, especially those resulting from piracy and shipwreck. The stockholders were protected by this provision from bad manage- ment but they were not given an opportunity to accept or reject the administration of the Company. They had to accept the appointment of directors nde by the large stockholders who formed the organization. Also the decisions made by the heads of the Company could not be pro- tested by the stockholders. They participated in the organization financially and that was all. They bore the burden of financial risk without a voice in policy.» for purposes of administering the Company and obtaining directors and stockholders the country was divided into five districts called chambers. Each chamber had a number of directors determined by the amount of capital subscribed in that chamber. The Amsterdam chamber being the largest and most wealthy was awarded twonty directors . 0f the other four districts three were penitted fourteen directors, and the smallest had twelve. From the five chambers a board of 101hid., p. 107. 23 directors or general assembly was selected. It consisted of nineteen directors who guided the overall policy of the Company. This group became known in history as "The Nineteen” or the Assembly of the III, or simply "The In" . They played an important role in Dutch history, and exerted a life or death influence on New Netherlands . The number of delegates to this body was determined by the amount of capital furnished by the respective chambers, and one additional one represent- ing the States General. Here again, the Amsterdam chamber was in the preponderance, having eight members as against the next largest dele- gation of four from Zeeland. All of the directorships were by appoint- ment from among the chief stockholders, and investment of from four to six thousand guilders being necessary to qualify. The smll investors were left at the mercy of an organization which they could not direct or advise, nor could they withdraw their funds for a period of twenty four years . The 111 ruled absolutely over Dutch affairs on two entire contin- ents and a part of a third. To all intents and purposes the Assembly of the m was the government and high court for all the territory not covered by the East India Company, with the exception of the area i-ediately surrounding the continent of Europe. The globe was divided into two spheres of influence, one for each of the two huge companies . The West India Company was to dominate the entire area enclosed between the meridians of the Cape of Good Hope and the western extremity of the island of New Guinea.ll Within these confines the III were empowered to act on a wide 11929;. , p. 89. 2h range of activities without fear of interference in government or trade matters. Governments, of course, could be established only in those areas not already occupied by other nations. But the restrictions on trade covered all commerce whether with Dutch territories or with those of foreign powers. Any Dutch trader attempting to encroach upon this area would be compelled to forfeit the ships and goods used or obtained in the attempt, and in case the goods or ships were taken to a foreign port and sold before they could be confiscated, the owners were liable for the full value of the ships and goods thus sold. As the Company dominated the commercial affairs so it dominated all other activities, both among its own people and those of other nations with whom.they came in contact. In dealing with independent nations in the area, as well as the natives, the XIX were given a free hand. In this respect they acted in place of the States General. On this score the Charter speaks for itself: The aforesaid Company, in our name and by our authority, within the limits herein.before set forth, shall have power to make such contracts, leagues and alliances with the princes and natives herein comprised, also to build fortresses and strongholds there; to appoint the transfer, discharge and replace governors, troops and officers of Justice and for other necessary services, for the preservation of the places, the maintenance of good order, police and Justice, in general for furtherance of trade, as according to the circumstances they shall see fit; moreover they may promote the settlement of fertile and uninhabited districts, and do all that the service of this country and the profit and increase of trade shall require.12 The admonition to "do all that the service of this country and the profit and increase of trade shall require", again emphasises the nature of the thing. This clause, together with the remainder of 12mm, p. 91. 25 the above instructions provided the basis for a tyrannical rule over the New Netherlands Colony. The desire to squeeze out of it every guilder of profit resulted in the stagnation and strangulation of the colony as long as it was directly under the control of the XIX and later under the Amsterdam Chamber to which its control was delegated after 1624. This lasted until 1629 when the Company attempted to shift part of the burden of control over to individuals known as patroons. Another provision, like that above, had significant influence on the conduct of affairs in the New Netherlands, and in a large measure led to the misrepresentation of the purpose for which the Nest India Company was formed. It was the Company's authority to wage war when the need arose. In the decades of 1620 and 1640, and for some tine after that, on the basis of this stipulation, the Company engaged in attacks on the Spanish treasure fleets and carried on a harrassing sea war against the Spanish possessions in the New werld. As suggested in earlier citations, the Company embarked upon these attacks when it was seen that the uninvaded portions of the West Indies were "of little consequence". They sought to accomplish by conquest what they had failed to do by discovery~——build an empire in the West. What is important fbr our purposes is the wording of the Charter as it regards the establishment of military and naval power within the Company, by means of which it decided to embark on hostile action against Spain. If at some later date, after the Company had commenced operations, the powers granted by this section of the Charter were used for war- 26 making purposes, it does not necessarily mean.that this was its sole or primary purpose. Earlier a citation was included which put the Company on record as saying "that this Company was in the conmaicement, designed principally to increase trade and commerce"13and that "we have all been solicited by their High Mightinesses' Commissioners, not only to undertake some hostile expedition against the enemy, but even to dispatch our fleet".lh As will be seen shortly, the contingency of war was prepared for, and why would it not be? The West India Company was sovereign over Dutch possessions in half the world. Furthermore, this company's ships represented a considerable portion of the nation's naval strength. It would have to be utilized in a.national emergency in any case, whether under the Company or under the direction of the States General. The basis for the company's military and naval strength was fbund in the preamble and in a special section devoted Specifically to such matters. These two references established the intent of the States as regarded the use of that power. The preamble states that "no profitable business can be carried on, protected and maintained...on account of the great risk from pirates, extortions and the like, which are incurred on such long and distant voyages",15 and therefore, the Charter gpes on to state: As it vill.be necessary for the establishment and security and defence of this trade to take sane troops along, we will, according to the condition of the country and the situation of affairs, fhrnish the said Company with such troops for field and garrison duty as igall be necessary, prov1ded they be paid and supported by the Company. 13See quote p. 19 l“See quote p. 20 15"Charter", Hen. BOW. M.S.S., p. 89 161bid., p. 93 2? Piracy was an important occupation in the period under consideration; in fact, along the channel coast pirates possessed such a stronghold and took such a toll of Dutch shipping that in 1631 Prince F‘rederich Henry led a full scale expedition against their citidal at Dunkirk. Although formed as a protection against pirates, in order to obtain the use of the Company's ships and armament for national defence, the Charter offered the following benefits to the Company if it engaged in the function of privateering: In case of war all prizes which may be taken from memies or pirates within the limits of this charter shall be seized by virtue of our proclamations...after deducting all necessary damages which the Company may have suffered in taking each prize, together with the dues His Excellency as Admiral in Chief... and the tenth part for the officers, sailors and soldiers who have taken the prize shall remain at the disposal of the directors of the aforesaid Company; provided that the account of them shall be kept separate and distinct from the account of trade and commerce, that the net proceeds of the said prize shall be employed in fitting out ships, paying troops, fortifications and garrisons and like matters of war and defence, by sea and land, and that there shall be no dis- tribution unless the said proceeds shall amount to so much that a notable share may be distributed without weakening the said defences and after paying the expenses of war, which distribution shall be made separately and apart from that account of trade: and the distribution shall be made one tenth part for the use of the United Netherlands and the remainder for the participants of this Company in exact proportion to their invested capital. In the war with Spain during the decade of the 1620's this prize-taking function was instrumental in bringing about the deci- sion on the part of the directors to give up part of the control of New Netherlands to the Patroons. A recent evaluation of the West India Company very frankly charges that during this period the Company resorted to privateering against Spain for their major source of revenue. The author of this particular work declared that the Dutch 17Ibid. , pp. 111-113. (.0 "wanted both to plunder the Spaniards and to create an empire... The directors in Amsterdam.fbndly believed they could continue to play the role of buccaneers on a large scale." But, he went on, "privateering on a.large scale called for large sums for equipment and manning of ships, which in this particular case had to be full- sized.men-ofhwar. To be profitable enormous booty had to be taken year after year, a thing hardly to be expected fbr the Spaniards and Portuguese were by no means defenseless, and quickly learned to counteract the ways of the Dutch privateers."18 The plunder and attempted conquest of Spain's possessions required all the energies of the organization, and consequently, little was left to the colony in the north. It is evidmt that the States General were seeking every means of assuring the profits of the Company. The quest for profits, it was felt, would serve as a policy guide fbr the affairs of the Dutch empire, a sort of invisible hand, as suggested later~by Adam Smith in his W <_)_i_' Naticns. Not only did the States invest a large sum; they also provided a substantial incentive to see the organi- zation off to a good start. Of the one million guilders provided by the national treasury, one half was to bear risk and profit, while the other part was donated outright. And from time to time the States found it necessary to make additional contributions. Ftrther, the gpvernment promised to protect the Company against "every person.in free navigation and trade," and.thus again help to assure profits. When the subscription was not filled rapidly 18Vlekk e, Dutch Nation, pp. 211-212. 29 enough, rather than invest more of the nation's funds, the States decided to add the final incemtive to investors. That incentive was the addition of the salt trade of Punta del Rey to the Company's privileges. It had been specifically excluded in the original draft of the Charter. This trade was especially important as an adjunct to the herring fisheries conducted out of the ports of Hoorn and Enkhuizen in the Northern Quarter. Bylnid-year of 1622 it was clear that steps had to be taken to stimulate the rate of investmait. In the original charter, the length of time subscriptions would be accepted was five months after July 1, 1621 or until the end of November. By by the next summer sufficient capital.was not yet in to commence operations; therefore, the following amendment was added: ...in our former proclamation of the ninth of June, in the year 1621, with a.prohibition that none of the natives or inhabitants of this country for the term of 24 years from the first of July next following should sail.or trade within the said limit, except only those who under the Charter granted to the aforesaid Company are perndtted to carry on the salt trade to Punta del Rey under the regulation therefore adOpted by us: whereas upon reconsidering that matter we find that it is useful.and necessary for the service of this country and for promoting the aforesaid Chartered Company to vest the aforesaid salt trade to Punta del Rey also in the said Company". 9 But even with this last concession, a rather substantial one, the stock of the Company was not mthusiastically received by investors. "Every sort of publicity and pressure was exerted to induce subscrip- tions. The East India Company, upon the request of the States General, which it was unable to refuse, and from whom it was then seeking a renewal of its charter, was compelled to subscribe one million guilders. The total subscription was seven million guilders of which three million...was subscribed in the Amsterdam department.2O 19"Amplification of the Charter of the West India Company", £1.92. BOW. M03030, pp. 117-118. 2USamuel G. Nissensen, Patroon's Domain (New York, 1937), p. 10. Hereafter cited Nissensen, Patroon's Domain. 30 In Spite of the need for inducements to invest in the venture, buccaneering was never offered as a future policy. If freebooting at the expense of Spain appeared as a lucrative possibility it was not used by either the directors or the States General to encourage investment in the Company. Much as the Dutch hated the Kings of Spain and in spite of the fact that the two nations were technically at war again open attack on his ships was never suggested. Even outside the Company the idea was never openly published. In 1622 and 1623 a lively pamphleteering was carried on in behalf of the West India Company. One of the appeals of the writers was to the patriotic spirit. A whole battery of leaflets pointed out that it was the duty of every patriotic Netherlander to subscribe to the Company's stock because the West India trade along with the East India trade, was vital to the national welfare. This, of course, is typical mercantilist doctrine. However, it was also pointed out that at the same time considerable damage could be done to the King of Spain's finances. A typical example is presented here: Third discourse in the fom of a letter in which it is briefly and concisely proved, the necessity of the East and West India commerce, and also demonstrated by good and fundamental reasons that by no means can a secure and solid peace be hoped for or expected. Wherefore, all true patriots in the country, firstly and mlers and then all wealthy inhabitants, are admonished to contribute largely to this now newly Chartered West India Company in order to insure its better success in annoying the Castilian traffic. First written to a certain friend, and now printed for the service of all true patriots by the lovers of Dutch Liberty.21 21G. M. Asher, _A_ Bibliographical and Historical Essay 9;; _th_e Dutch Books gn_<_i_ Pamphlets Relating tg New Netherlands a_n_d_ :9 the Dutch West India_ Company and its Possessions it; Brazil and Angola, etc. (Amsterdam, 1854-673—fpp. 103-111.. Unfortunately this volume contains only the title and a brief statement from each of the works cited. 31 One might argue that the author of this leaflet was suggesting conflict with Spain. However, that need not be true. In the absence of such a suggestion elsewhere in records and papers relating to the West India Company one can assume that, as a mercantilist doctrine, the above statement could be construed to mean.that whatever trade was taken by the Dutch would be denied the Spaniards. If a war fever were desired the patriots would surely have used stronger language than this. The statement can be immobilized by attributing it to mercantile philosophy. In spite of all the appeals to patriotic as well as financial motives the termination.date for acceptance of investments was moved forward almost two years. Initially, all funds were supposed to be pledged before the end of November, 1621. But under the circumstances the final date was extended to the last day of August, 1623, and for for- eigners to the last day of October, 1623. By the fall of 1623 the capital stock amounted to 7,108,106.5 guilders, which was the full subscription. Now, at last, the Company was ready to commence operations, but it was not until the following spring that any concrete action was taken. Thus after a delay of fourteen years, the Dutch were at last ready to begin developing their claims in the New'Horld. At least the machinery was there: what they did with it remains to be seen. Having settled upon a general company, armed and.with wide discretion in all colonial.matters, the States General turned to consider other _problens. The Western.Hemisphere was the domain of the XIX. Some time later the XIX delegated the affairs of New Netherlands to a special commission.made up of members of the Amsterdam.Chamber. 32 They retained the overall control, but specific tasks were delegated in this manner. It remains to be told how the Company treated its charges in the‘Hestern.Hamisphere, specifically in.New Netherlands, which a half century later came to be called New York. 33 CHAPTER III Up to this point little has been said directly relating to the principle topic of this work-”New Netherlands. The matters dealt with have been, for the most part, geographically far removed from the Colony--but nevertheless important. The history of New Nether- lands was greatly influenced by what has preceded this chapter. The aim of this chapter is to begin the story of New Netherlands and follow it up to midyear 1626. The year 1626 is readily recognized as the historic year Peter Minuit purchased Manhattan Island from the Indians for a handful of trinkets. It is with this event that most historians begin the history of the Dutch in America. This is unfortunate because the course of events for some years was largely influenced by what took place before that historic transaction. From the founding of the colony of New Netherlands to the purchase of Manhattan Island condi- tions in the colony made an almost complete turnabout. All the progress that had been made during the two years from 162h to 1626 was reduced to nothing by an event that took place before the island was acquired. In fact, the event which took place at Fort Orange may have geatly influmced the Dutch in the decision to make the Island their headquarters in the New World. The events during the years 1621+ to 1626 are sanewhat confused. No significant events have inaccurate dates assigned to them. To make the chronology of this portion of Dutch history in New York accurate it will be necessary to clear up some of the confusion 3h surrounding the dates. The first was the arrival of the colonists in New Netherlands and the second the purchase of Manhattan. These events are significant mough to justify the effort. The best evidence seems to indicate that the original colony of settlers was sent out to New Netherlands in the spring of 1624. There are sane accounts that place the date at 1623, but there is some doubt as to whether they are correct. Many of the accounts that favor the year 1623 are based on the writings of Nicolaes von Wassenaer. In an article dated December 1, 1621. he noted that "the West India Company being chartered to navigate these rivers did not neglect to do so, but equipped in the spring (1623) a vessel of 130 lasts, called the 'Niew Nederlandt' , whereof Cornelius Jacobsen May of Hoorn was skipper, with a company of thirty families, mostly of Walloons, to plant a colony there....They sailed in the beginning of March...and in the beginning of May sailed into the river now called the Mauritius.“l There is a question of whether the date in parentheses was Wassenaer's or that of his translators. His article was dated in the last month of 1621.. and he states that the Company equipped a ship "in the spring". Another source seems to support the earlier date until a close look is taken at its wording. It reads as follows: "In the years 1622 and 1623, the West India Company took possession by virtue of their Charter, of the said country, and voyaged thither in their ship New Netherland, divers colonists under the direction of Cornelius Jacobsen May...."2 The statement is not clearly made and it is not 1Wassenaer, Narr. New Neth., pp. 7144-5. The river later became known as the Hudson River. 25. 1. Q_o_1_. Docs., I, 11.9. 35 clear whether it meant that possession was taken in 1623 or whether possession was taken and the trip made at the same time. Actually the Company officially took possession in 1623 when the stock sub- scription was completed. It seem that that is what is referred to. A set of documents translated in 1921‘ by A. J . 1'. Von Laer answers the doubts concerning whether it was 1623 or 1621!». One of the documents in this set deals specifically with the sailing of the vessel, !_e_w_ Netherland. It contains instructions by which the colony was to .be ruled during the first few months. Before the first colonists boarded the ship they were compelled to swear to obey rules set down inthe document. It was dated March 30, 162k and is a trans- cript of official West India Company papers. Based on the date of this document the first settlement in New Netherlands took place in the spring of 162k rather than in 1623. There is agreement among all authors that the ship which delivered the first colonists was named after the colonyuthe New Hetherland. The document which sets the date at 162} for the sailing also identifies the ship. It reads as follows: ”The foregoing articles have been read to the colonists going over in “the ship New Netherland, they took the oath of allegiance this 30th day of March anno 16%...."3 This statement leaves little doubt about which date is correct. . The colonists who went over on the New Fatherland were refugees who, like the Brownists of Leyden in 1620, had requested the Dutch to transport them to mama. under Dutch rule in the New world. These refugees had previously petitioned the King of England for 3Documents Relative to New Netherlands, 162h-1626, A. J. 1'. Von Leer ed. {Ban Marine, California, 19210, p. 18. Hereafter cited Docs. Rel. Le! Neth. 36 permission to settle in Virginia. They were French-speaking Walloons, "Protestant exiles from the Southern Netherlands which had remained Spanish and Catholic."h Through the King's ambassador at The Hague they requested the right to go to Virginia and begged that they be protected in their religion and be given free lands.5 When assistance was not ibrthcoming from the English, however, the French Walloons prevailed upon the Dutch to tranSport them. The Directors of the Company, having failed to accept the offer of the Brownists to peOple their lands did not fail in this Opportunity and delivered the Walloons to America to strengthen their trading posts. Upon arrival in the New World the group was divided to settle in several widely-separated locations. The exact dispositim made of the thirty families who came over is not known. One secondary account, without stating its source of information, made the division as follows: eight families were left on Manhattan Island to take possessicn for the Company (the Island was to be reserved exclusively for the Company's use); four couples who had married at sea and eight men were sent to form a settlement on the South River, now the Delaware, and selected a spot on the east bank, near the present tom of Gloucester, New Jersey; two families and six men were sent to the great Fresh River, now the Connecticut, to build Fort Good Hope on the present site of the City of Hartford; eighteen families proceeded up the Hudson to settle at Fort Orange, at what is now Albany.6 Wassenaer recorded only the disposition of the last group, what- ever its size. He said that "the ship sailed up to the Mohicans, 1.1+ ANettels, R_Lots _o_f American Civilization, p. 196. 5N. Y. Col. Docs., III, 9. 6Henry_ G. Bayer, The Belgians First Settlers _i_n_ New York and the Middle States (New York, 1925), pp. 159-60. The statement was not foot- noted and could not be verified. 37 7 leagues, and they built a fort named 'Orange' ." This was on the site of the fort originally built in l61h by the New Netherlands Company traders. A close examination of the above division will reveal that the total number of families divided among the four settlements exceeds thirty which is the accepted number given by Wassenaer. Be that as it may, the dispersal indicates that there were four small, weak colonies created. The exact number of colonists is not vital at this time. The account that placed it at thirty families may have used only an approximation. The group sent to the South River located the seat of government. Contrary to may popular beliefs, the original colonial government was located on the South River (Delaware River) opposite what is now Philadelphia. The governors of the colony from 1621!» to 1626 resided here rather than at Manhattan Island, or Fort Amsterdam (Fort Amsterdam was not begun until 1626) . Cornelius Jacobsen May, the skipper of the 'New Netherland' which delivered the Valloons and the first governor set up his headguarters there. "His administration continued during the year 162R." Neither he nor-his successor resided at Manhattan. This is made clear by an order sent with Verhulst, his successor. It stated that "he, Willem Verhulst, is to have his usual place of residence on the South’River," from whence he "shall also from time to time, as the occasion may require, betake himself to the North River to regulate utters there." The statement, "the usual place", is construed to mean the usual residence of the governor. There is no evidence of 7Wessenaer, Narr. New Neth., p. 75. cs. Rel. New Neth., p. 61+. 911315., p. 61}. 38 Verhulst having been present in the colony prior to the time of his assignment as governor; therefore, "the usual place" did not refer to his personal residence, but to that of the governor. The govern- ment, such as it was, remained on the South River until 1626. During what might be called the first phase of the settlement's history, there were tw° governors. The first was the skipper who brought the colonists over, one Cornelius Jacobsen May. He was succeeded by a much more important individual sent out by the West India Company as a permanent officer. May had been merely a temporary appointee, as his main occupation was that of ship's captain. Verhulst was sent out some time in late 162k or very early 1625. The governor was assisted by a council and a second in command known as the Conissary. The Commissary was instructed to keep the minutes of the meetings. He also acted as clerk of the court, when the council sat in its Judicial capacity. These duties were but part of this man's Job. He was also the keeper of the Company records, such as the books of account for the warehouses where an account was kept for every colonist who drew goods. These the colonists were to pay for at a later date either from.wages received in.the employ of the Company or from.sale of merchandise to the agents of the Company. The colonists were denied the right to sell to anyone else but the Company. This, as a utter of fact, was still another part of the Comissary's function-~- to see that the settlers sold their furs and goods only to the Company and that at prescribed prices. He was also supposed to see that the prices were not bid up unduly. Along the line of trade, as keeper of 39 the warehouse, he issued trading goods to the agent-traders who met with the Indians. It was his duty to keep them stocked with the proper trading articles and receive the furs they turned in and prepare them for shipment. All in all he was a very important figure. In his administration the governor was assisted by a council. The council had a mxmber of functions. The counselors acted as advisors to the governor, or director as he was sometimes called, rather than as legislators. Perhaps more important was their Judicial function. The council tried all cases civil and criminal according to the laws of Holland and Zeeland and instructions sent out by the West India Company. In addition the council assigned land grants to eligible colonists, inspected tools which were to be discarded as worn out, and informed the directors of the Company of all matters pertain- ing to the welfare of the settlements. This unusual body was made up of Company appointees. In met cases the tenure of a councilor was very short. Except for the Comissary there were no permanent councilors at this time. The majority of the council was made of ships' captains present in the colony at the time of the meeting. The value of such an arrangement is certainly open to question as far as intelligent administration of local matters is concerned. The skippers were not apt to be well informed on local problems . The law by which the Colony was ruled was made up of a series of instructions prepared by the West India Company directors. These instructions contained little in the way of civil and criminal law; rather they contained rules and regulations the Company felt were appropriate for the local conditions and suited their interests. Ordinary civil and criminal matters not covered by Specific instruc- tions from the Company were presumed to be handled by the legal code of Holland and Zeeland as they were a few years later. The original set of instructions for the administrators of the colony was made up by the board of directors of the West India Company, the Assembly of the XIX. The Assembly at that time was heavily mgaged in other matters, sane of then dealing with other portions of the New World. As a result a set of hastily drawn regu- lations was made up two days before the departure of the first group of colonists. This document was appropriately titled "Pro- visional Regulations for the Colonists." They were adopted by the Assembly on March 28, 1621.. The ship carrying the Walloons left Amsterdam March 30, 1621.. The haste with which the rules were made did not obscure the intention of the Company with regard to the administration of the new territory. Rather than risk losing some of the import of the document it is reproduced here in full. 1+1 Provisional Regulations for the Colonists Adopted by the Assembly of the m of the West India Company March 28, 1621.10 Provisional conditions upon which the respective colonists have been engaged in the service of the West India Company and sent out to New Netherlands, to take up their abode on the river of Prince Mauritius, or at such other places as shall be assigned to them by the Commander and his council. 1. The colonists shall, in addition to observing the respective articles and instructions, during the voyage and their residence, and in changing their location, be bound to obey and carry out 'without any contradiction the orders of the Company already given them.or still to be given, as well as all regulations received from the said Company in regard to matters of administration and Justice. 2. They shall within their territory practice no other form of divine worship than that of the Reformed Religion as at present practiced in this country and thus by their Christian life and conduct seek to draw the Indians and other blind people to the knowledge of God and His word without however persecuting any one on account of his faith, but leaving to everyone the freedom of his conscience. But if anyone among them or within their Jurisdiction should wantzonly revile or blaspheme the name of God or of our Savior Jesus Christ, he shall according to the circumstances be punished by the coriander and his council. 3. The sounder and other officers already appointed or still to be appointed over them shall, in conformity with the instructions given by the Company, have power to mks alliances and treaties with foreign princes and potentates in that country residing near their colonies, upon the conditions as shall be deemed most advan- tageous to the service of the Company, without paying heed in such treaties to anyone's private interests. Which conditions the colonists collectively, and each of them individually, shall be holden to observe, although by so doing they should be involved in war with others, their neighbors, and even be obliged to take the field. 101311., PP. 2‘18e h2 it. They shall take up their permanent residence at the place to be assigned to them.by the commander and his council and use all diligence to fortify the same by common effort, likewise erecting in common the necessary public buildings and establish trade rela- tions as far as possible. And if anyone should be remis herein, and the Company or the settlement through his neglect should suffer damage, he shall be corrected and punished according to the cir- cumstances of the case. 5. In all public business, be it civil, military, or Judicial, they shall use Nether-Dutch language only, the penalty for not doing so being that all public dispatches and proceedings drawn up in other languages shall be null and void and of no effect. 6. The colonists shall without paying any recognition therefore receive from.the Company the costs of transportation, as well as the place and lands to be cultivated by thegbwhich, according to the size of their families and their industry, shall be allotted to them.by the Commander and his council. 7. Further, whereas in the beginning all necessaries will have to be transported thither from this country, the Company shall arrange to have the colonists during the first two years provided with the necessary supplies and clothes from.its storehouses, and that at a reasonable price, which the colonists who receive the supplies, if they cannot pay the amount at once, shall be holden to pay and satisfy in installments, being debited‘with the goods received on the Company‘s books, and giving receipts thereof under their hand to the receiver of the Company. In regard to which the Commander and the Commissary are ordered to take good care that nothing be neglected; also they are to give out no goods on credit, except to those who are in.need, letting no prodigals or those who neglect their property enJoy this privilege, but leaving them to bear the inconvenience resulting from.their own carelessness. 8. The colonists shall be free to carry on and prosecute the inland trade without obJection on the part of anyone, on the express condition that they shall sell the goods they have purchased or collected to no one but the Company's agents, and this provisionally until other regulations, as necessity may'require, shall have been made herein. “3 9. They shall be free to engage in all sorts of sport of fowling, hunting, and fishing, and this provisionally as above. 10. All minerals, newly discovered or still to be discovered mines of gold, silver, copper or any other metals, as well as precious stones such as diamonds, rubies, and the like, together with the pearl fishery, shall be allowed to be worked by the Company's men only. ll. But if anyone of the colonists during his sojourn there should discover anything of the kind aforementioned, he and his heirs shall receive as a reward l/lO part of the net proceeds of the aforesaid mines or pearl fishery, and that for the period of the first six successive years, to be reckoned from the day on which the Company took over and commenced to exploit the same. 12. With the understanding that all costs of exploitation and of the necessary tools pertaining thereto shall first be subtracted and deducted, and that as the first discoverer shall be as he who. first reveals the same to the Commander there, or the general company here. And if any such discovery be made by anyone and de- liberately concealed, such person shall if the fact becomes known, be arbitrarily punished according to the circumstances of the case-- yea, even corporally. 13. They shall not be permitted to exercise themselves or to teach others any handicraft to which trade attaches, especially dyeing, except by special consent of the Company or its agents, upon pain, should anyone act contrarywise, of being expelled as a perjurer and arbitrarily punished according to the circumstances of the case. 1h. They shall not permit any stranger (whereby are understood all persons who are outside the Jurisdiction of the Company or its commissaries) coming to their shores to do any trading, nor hold any intercourse with them.whereby they in any way may learn the profits, needs or situation of the place, on pain of being punished therefore according to the circumstances of the case. uh 15. Furthermore, the colonists shall solemnly promise upon oath to keep secret all transactions and affairs of the Company which may in any way come to their knowledge, and they shall not be at liberty to divulge the same after they have withdrawn.themselves from.the authority of the Company; (likewise, they promise that they shall at no time hereafter associate themselves with any but those of the Company) to come within the limits of the charter, whatever it may be. 16. They shall also be bound to remain at the place of their destination with their families for the space of six consecutive years, unless a change be made herein by order of the Company, but at the expiration of their bounden.time, or sooner, in the case of removal by order of the Director or their honorable agents, they shall be permitted to trade or to sell their houses, planted fields, and cattle to someone else among the remaining colonists. 17. They shall at first plant and sew on the lands alloted to them.such products and crops as the Commander and his Council shall order, without making any change therein for any private reason, on pain of being punished by the Council for any contra- vention thereof, according to the circumstances. 18. They shall take especial care, whether in trading or in other matters, faithfully to fulfill their promises to the Indiana or other neighbors and not to give them.any offense without cause as regards their persons, wives, or property on pain of being punished rigorously therefore. 19. The directors shall at all times have the right to transport thither as many people as they shall deem.expedient. 20. Finally, they shall take the oath of allegiance and obedience to the High and Mighty Lords the States General and to the Company, and shall in all things comport themselves as good and loyal sub- Jects ought to do. #5 21. The forgoing articles having been read to the colonists going over in the ship "Niew Nederlandt", they took the oath of allegiance this 30th day of March anno 162%. Under was written: Before Dr. Claes Petersz and Gharrard Schaep. Was signed D. Mostaert. Though the South River settlement constituted the seat of govern- ment, Fort Orange was the center of activity both in trade and agriculture. Fort Orange, from the earliest days of Dutch activity in the New World, was the heart of the whole territory. It was the central trading post where the Indians of the Hudson and,MOhawk River valleys came to exchange their furs for Dutch hardware and trinkets. Here in the Hudson valley was also found the most fertile farmland yet discovered in New Netherlands. Furs and agriculture were the life4blood of the colony as well as the source of profits to the west India Company. As far as the directors were concerned the fur trade was the most important because from it came the most abundant profits. .Agriculture would realize little profit, but it would be important in defraying expenses of the colony. What was grown in the colony would not have to be shipped from the old Country. For a brief period the colonists were permitted to carry on‘both activities; that is, they were allowed to trade directly with the Indians. The only qualification to this privilege was that they could sell the acquired furs to no one but company agents. It was presumed that fur trading would not detract from the primary function for which the Amsterdam directors had trans- ported them to America---agriculture. It was the intention of the Company to populate New Netherlands 146 with farmers for the purpose of maintaining possession of the outposts of trade.‘ Killian van.Rensselaer, a prominent director, and later the only successful patroon, outlined the Company policy in this regard. "From the very commencement of the Company...in order to continue the possession of those quarters, and to maintain the trade in peltries, several colonies were set up."ll Of the settlements thus established one was particularly success- ful in both the fur trade and agriculture for a time. For the settlers at Fort Orange, the prospects for farming were excellent, far superior to either of the other settlements. Here the walloons found large tracts that had already been cleared by the Mohican.Tribe. The ‘Walloons' friendship with the Mohicans was also a considerable aid to them.in farming. From.them.they learned much, for the Mohicans were good farmers, as their large stocks of grain would testify. With the knowledge gained from.the Indians plus Old'World experience it was not long before reports reached the homeland of the excellent prospect for farmers. DeLaet reported in l62h that "the land is excellent and agreeable to the eye, full of noble forest trees and grapevines, and nothing is wanting but the labor and industry of man to render it one of the finest and.most fruitful lands in this part of the world."12 The'Walloons were willing and able to supply that labor and industry and before the season was finished the trading ship Macheral, leaving in the autumn of 162%, was able to report that "the corn was as high as a man."13 ‘With a few seasons of hard labor the Fort Orange settlement might have become highly productive and prosperous. The introduction of farm.animals would have been llBen. Bow. MSS., p. 235. lafieiaet, Narr. N3! Neth., p. #9. 13weaeenee“r, g‘ . ;. fie—t: g_o__1_. (18kg), II, 136. 1+7 the fulfillment of the farmers' dreams. Great optimism surrounded the Fort Orange settlement in the first year. That Joy and hope spilled over into the letters of the Walloons to their friends at home. After their first successful season their letters bore out what DeLaet had observed. Most of the letters and commications of the Valleons have been lost like so many papers concerning the colony, but excerpts remain in the pages of Willem Daudart's Manor 1: Ofte Cort Verhael (Memorial 2}: Brief Record), published in 1621+. A secondary work of relatively recent origin and edited by a well-known author declares that the tenor of most of the letters is illustrated by the following: We were much gratified on arriving in this country: Here we found beautiful rivers, bubbling fountains flowing down into the valleys; basins of running waters in the flat lands, agreeable fruits in the woods, such as strawberries, walnuts, and also... wild grapes. The woods abound with acorns for feeding hogs, and with venison. There is considerable fish in the rivers; good tillage land: here is, especially free coming and going, without fear of the naked natives of the country. Had we cows, hogs, and other cattle fit for food (which we daily expect in the first ships) we would not wish to return to Holland, for whatever we desire in the paradise of Holland, is here to be found. If you come hither with your family, you will not regret it..1 he so often happens, this pleasant dream of the future was shattered. Three events took place in rapid succession to end for all time any idea that New Netherlands would ever be the 'equal of the "paradise of Holland". The one incident involved relations with the Indians, a second had to do with the cattle that the colonists anxiously awaited, am the third involved Yerhulst, the governor. It would be difficult indeed to establish which incident was the most significant. 11"I. l. P. Stokes, ed., The Iconoggphy 9; Manhattan Island, 6 vols. (New York 1895-1928), IV, 60. 1+8 Early in 1625 the ship loads of farm animals arrived at the lower end of the Hudson. Along with the animals came direct orders as to how and under what conditions the animals were to be distributed. Four ships carried the cargo including some ”one hundred and three stallions, mares, bulls and cows for breeding and multiplying."15 If the Colonists presumed that the arrival of the animals was the answer to their prayers, they must have been terribly disillusioned. Apparently they had not known what the terms of ownership would be. At the same time the animals arrived a group of farmer-managers or head farmers, as they came to be called, arrived also. They were to operate farms owned by the Company. To these farms were appor- tioned the lion's share of the best horses and cattle. hch of the five head farmers was entrusted with four cows and four horses and a large share of the sheep and hogs. What remained was to be dis- tributed among the Colonists. Under the system of distribution, the five head farmers received their share, then the remining animls were given over to the Colonists without cost, but on condition that "the first calf shall be kept by them for one year and then belong to, and be turned over to, the Company. The second shall be for themselves, the third for the Company, the fourth for themselves, and so on successively, it being understood that when the calves belonging to the Colonists shall themselves have calves, one half of the increase shall be for the Company. . .provided always that they are to keep them for one year as aforesaid."‘16 Two other restrictions were also attached to the raising of the l5Wassenaer, Harr. New Neth., p. 79. 1 cos. Rel. New Neth., p. 151. ”(9 cattle and animals. First, no one was permitted to slaughter any animals without the express permission of the Council. For the first offense the violator would be compelled to pay four times the value of the animal: for a second offense he would be deprived of all wages due him, be imprisoned, and be shipped back to the fatherland. Second, if, on the advice of the Council it "shall be permissible to slaughter the yearlings...that are in excess... one tenth shall be kept by the person who raised them or the head farmer...and the remaining nine-tenths shall be for the benefit of the Company to be disposed of at reasonable prices, to be fixed.by the Council, to those who desire any part thereof."17 And if this were not enough to discourage the settlers there was added a more serious difficulty the following spring, 1626. The area in and around Fort Orange was frequented'by two tribes, the Mohawks and the MOhicans. The latter had always gotten on well with the whites, exchanging fUrs and knowledge of farming. The former had little liking for either the whites or the MOhicans. A dispute developed.between the two tribes. Creeckenbeeck, the commander of Fort Orange, out of friendship toward the Mbhicans, allowed himself and his men to antagonize the war-like MOhawks even though Company directors had clearly indicated that the colonists should not engage in Indian disputes. The friendly tribe had "requested to be assisted by the Commander...and six others. Commander Creeckenbeeck went with them: a league from.the fort they met with the Mbhawks who fell so boldly upon them with a 17Ibid., p. 98. 5O discharge of arrows, that they were forced to fly, and many were killed, among them were the Commander and three of his men...."18 The account goes on to relate the consequence of the Comander's error. The Mohawks displayed their contempt for the white men by holding a cannibalistic banquet at which the Dutchmen were roasted and eaten! Survivors related the tale of horror of the settlers at Hort Orange. It must have struck terror into the hearts of the farmers outside the confines of the Fort. with this incident it was painfully clear that the Mohawks could not be treated with the same cordiallity as the Hohicans. The war between the tribes continued intermittently for several years. During this period the safety of the Fort Orange colonists as well as those of the other outposts was in Jeopardy. There was ever the possibility of an attack by the fierce Mohawks against the relatively unprotected farmers. The council of the colony decided that the danger was too great, and therefore everyone was compelled to move to the safety of Manhattan Island. Throughout the years after the disaster involving Creeckenbeeck, Port Orange became a military outpost. From 1626 to the end of the period under consideration, it was occupied, at first, by sixteen men, a number later increased to twenty-five or twenty-six. They remined in that precarious situation to maintain the Fort and to carry on whatever trade they could. This was done on the apron orders of the Amterdem Directors . The Fort remained in the state of preparedness and under military rule virtually independent of 18'Cvlassenaer, Narr. 1°23. Neth., pp. 814-5 51 the Council. The virtual independence'was the result of two factors- distance and the fact that the council was occupied with other matters of equally grave importance. At about the same time or shortly before the incident at Fort Orange, the Council took the unprecedented step of arresting the governor. In their judicial capacity they arrested him.fbr his misconduct, as they called it. Issack de Rasiere, who became commissary somewhat later described the plight of the colonists under Verhulst's rule as fellows: "they have...been harshly ruled by Verhulst and that without any legal formality, but merely upon his own authority."19 For his misconduct in office Verhulst was detained in custody until the Arms of Amsterdam carried him and his wife home to stand trial again before the directors of the West India Company; The office vacated by Verhulst was filled by Peter Minuit, who took command at the request of the Council upon his arrival in New Netherlands. Minuit had been in America earlier but had returned to the Netherlands, and.now on his second voyage he was made governor. This was in the Spring of 1626. By the time the next vessel arrived that year, Minuit had already begun his official duties. On July 28, 1626, the firms of Amsterdam anchored off Manhattan Island. Minuit's secretary who was then just arriving commented that "On our arrival here we did not find Minuit, he having gone to Fort Orange to inquire into the disaster caused by fine reckless adventure of Creeckenbeeck.... On Minuit's arrival here he was placed in command on account of the bad conduct of Verhulst."20 Verhulst had already been tried and was await- ing deportation, while Minuit began energetic pursuit of his immediate 19Docs. Rel. New Neth., p. 187. 201bid., pp. 175-6. 52 problems, namely, of preserving Fort Orange. The incident at the Port was a major crisis for the Colony as well. as for the West India Company. It required Minuit's immediate attention for two reasons; the interference of Creeckenbeeck in the ' quarrel had violated the specific instruction given by the Company to keep free of Indisntroubles , and if the Fort had to be abandoned, the trade there would be lost. The directors of the Company had foreseen the possibility of the Colony becoming involved in quarrels among the Indians, and they therefore cautioned the governor to "be very careful not lightly to enbroil himself in their quarrels or war, or to take sides, but to remain neutral and to pacify and recon- cile the parties by the most suitable means."21 But by the time Minuit had arrived the damage had been done, and the trade there was in grave danger. Isaack de Rasiere reported to Amterdan later that year: "trade at Fort Orange has been very bad because of the war between ‘Creeckenbeeck and the Mohawks ."22 Fortunately, the trade was not completely lost. I The most serious consequence was that the colonists were forced to retreat to Manhattan Island. Prior to the outbreak of hostilities Wassenaer reported that there "had been 8 families, plus ten or twelve sailors" at Fort Orange .23 Those on the South River, the seat of the government, were also sent to Manhattan. Fort lassau on the South River remained unoccupied during the next few years. The trade there was carried on by sailing vessels. By the middle of the year the entire population of the Colony was Sift—I: 3223:5' assenaer, larr. New Neth., p. 81*. Note that this seems to contradict a statement made earlier that 18 families were sent to Port me e 53 located safely on the Island. Only Fort Orange remained as an occupied trading outpost. l‘rom this time on Manhattan Island. was the focal point of all Dutch activities in North America. Among the first acts performed by Minuit in his official capacity as governor was the historic purchase of the Island from the Indians. By direction of the Company no lands were to be appropriated from the natives without giving them satisfactory compensation. Under no circum- stances were the settlers to forgo the Indians into a sale or take ”possession by craft or fraud."2 Under such instructions this simple, unadorned transaction took place to the everlasting credit of the Dutch nation. The exact facts relative to the purchase are somewhat confused and obscured. Accurate data are scarce. From two accounts it is found that the purchase was made for a price of either 36 or 60 guilders some time early in 1626. An interpreter of Nassenaer's work, and indeed, many secondary accounts hold for the 36-guilder price. But on the other hand the official documents of the States General reveal, in a letter from Peter Schogen, that the price was 60 guilders. The latter seen more reliable since it was nearer to the scene in time and place. Peter Schogen was in New Nether- lands at the time of the transaction. He returned to Europe on the im— 93 Amsterdam in the autumn of 1626. None of the accounts state the exact date of the purchase. Schogen wrote that it took place in the spring, for, he declared, 2"raid” p. 106. 5h "They have purchased the Island of Manhattan from the Indians for. the value of 60 guilders,..They had their grain in by the middle ' of May and reaped'by the Middle ofAugust."25 wassenaer, who often included in his accounts the arrival and departure of ships, reported the date on which Minuit arrived in the New World. He spoke of "Adrian Jbris...skipper, who went out there on the 19th of December of the year 1625 with the ship the §§a_ygw_and conveyed Peter Minuit.... The §EELEEE arrived there on the hth of May, 1626."26 This more or less coincides with the date given by Schogen relative to the plant- ing of the grain. It seems very likely that the purchase must have been made very shortly after the arrival of Minuit, within the period between may h and the middle of the month. The Company had intended to purchase a large tract of land for a permanent installation for some time. Orders had been given to select a suitable place for a major fortification and settlement as early as April, 1625. Up until that time no permanent installations had been erected. The forts on the Hudson and the Delaware were only small structures suitable for a small garrison. Now the directors urged the construction of a major fort to accommodate large quantities of goods and many colonists as well as the garrison. Accordingly, they sent the following order to the Colony: In case there cannot immediately be found a suitable place abandoned by the Indians or unoccupied, at least 800 to 1,000 morgans in extent, fit for sowing and pasture, we do not consider it advisable to construct so strong a fortification...as called for by the specifi- cations which the surveyor has with him, but advise that only a tempo- rary settlement be made....Verhulst, assisted'by the surveyor Cyrn Fredericksz...shall investigate which is the most suitable place abandoned 25"Peter Schogen to the States General", 1626, N. X. 92$: 2233., I: 37. 26Wassenaer, g. :. Hist. 99;. (1819), New Series, II, 363. 55 or unoccupied, on either river, and then settle there with all the cattle and build the necessary fortifications.27 Manhattan Island more than filled the requirements and accord- ingly was purchased by Minuit. It was said to measure 11,000 morgens in size and was suitably located to cover the entrance to the river. The island also provided the pasture required for the cattle and horses arriving at about the same time. The directors were at last preparing to form a permanent settlement in the New World. Everything was to be centered in Fort Amsterdam.as the structure and colony were to be called. It is not altogether clear what the primary motivation was behind the order to build Fort Amsterdam. In the original plans the structure was to be of considerable size, rectangular in shape and open on the water side.28 If it was the primary aim.to protect the colony against attack from the Spanish and Portuguese, it was not stated in the instructions as to location or dimensions of the structure. It will be recalled that orders were for the fort to be situated on ”suitable place abandoned by the Indians or unoccupied, at least 800 to 1,000 morgens in extent, fit for sowing and pasture.... on either river." Certainly such instructions would not be given if there was danger of attack from the sea by a European power or pirates. That the fort was proposed for purposes of local protection seems to be further indicated by the preamble to the instructions sent with the man designated to supervise the construction. It reads: Special Instructions for the Engineer and Surveyor, Cyrn Fredericksz, and for the Commissary and Councilors, according to which they are to regulate themselves in regard to the fortification and the building of houses when the Council, pursuant to our instructions, shall have found a suitable place in which to establish a settlement with all the cattle.29 27Docs. Rel. New'Neth., p. 105-6. id., p. 133. 29Ibid., p. 132. 56 The directors had given no indication that they had intended to concentrate the entire effort on the Island of Manhattan. After the "recklessness of Creeckenbeeck" had caused the retreat from Fort Orange the attractiveness of Manhattan with its 11,000 morgens of land was greatly increased. The Walloons had found that the area at Fort Orange was highly desirable and much of it had been clear so that it might have been considered if the incident had not occurred. After the attack it was necessary to concentrate the effort and strength in a place suitable for keeping the animals and that could be easily defended. The island suited the situation admirably. A recent critic of the Company's policy took a rather more disparaging view of the move to the island. “Only commercial consideration made them (the Company) planters of overseas settlements. They realized that in North America they needed a fortified center for their fur trade, where the peltry could be stored until an opportunity was offered for shipment to Holland. The island at the mouth of the Hudson was found to be the most suitable location for the Company's trading post and storehouse."3O This, of course, is true only in part for it does not take into consid- eration the Indian menace. What is important is that the whole popula- tion was forced to seek shelter on the island. This move was the turning point in the history of New Netherlands. We know that up to this time at least part of the colonists were enthusiastic about their situation. This was true for those who were at a distance from.Verhulst. After his arrest, prospects must have brightened for all the settlers. But with the commencement of the 30Adrian Barnouw, The Pageant 93 Netherlands History (New York, 1952), p. 195. difficulties at Fort Orange many things changed. What those changes were is the subject matter for succeeding pages. 57 CHAPTERN The purchase of Mhnhattan.which begins most histories of New Netherlands was of great significance not as the beginning of the Colony's history, but as an.important turning point in its fortunes. what had begun with vigor and promise two years previous to the historic purchase was, in the following years, to undergo a signif- icant transformation---a transformation.which greatly influenced the decision to establish Patroonships as a method of populating the land. As the move began toward Manhattan there seemed to be little cause to be discouraged for the Company had already formulated plans for the formation of a permanent colony fully equipped and protected. But as the plans become known, it developed that one item.was over- looked, the most valuable asset the'Vest India Company had in America, the colonists. .All the elaborate planning had one thing in mind--- the convenience of the Company. The neglect of the settlers beget the change of fortune that occurred during the three years after the purchase and made the patroonships appear to be the answer to the Dutch colonial problem. By the time the Council and the other officials had decided on the location of the new Fort Amsterdam which the directors had ordered to be built it was already the middle of 1626. The orders to build the installation had been issued in April of 1625 and probably arrived in the Colony by mid-summer. The selection of Manhattan, as we have seen, was influenced by the affair between 59 Creeckenbeeck and the Mohawks at Fort Orange. The plans sent to the Engineer and Surveyor, Cyrn Fredericksz, were much more than plans for a fort. They included a complete layout for farm.lands, homes inside the fort, public buildings and everything necessary for a compact community sheltered from.possible enemy attack. Every detail.was taken care of with an eye to the convenience of the Company. The scope and detail for the plan indicate that the‘west India Company felt that the colony had real promise as a business venture, for they were contemplating a sub- stantial investment in it. In their plans, though, the directors evidenced the short term.nature of their thinking for they singularly failed to accomodate the colonists who in the long run would have nude their investment profitable and secure. At the time the instructions were made up there was evidence of real enthusiasm.for the project. That the directors intended the work to go forward rapidly is indicated by the instruction for beginning the work and hiring labor. Nothing was to be spared to attain this objective. While the surveyor is staking out the aforesaid place, the farmers shall take good care of the cattle, and the smith Jacob Lourensz, with his helpers, shall commence to make the most necessary iron work. The wheelwright shall also take in hand what is necessary, while the carpenters shall.meanwhile cut and saw lumber, and first of all make an enclosure in which the cattle are to be kept at night, they to be guarded night and day by some boys. And in order that the work may progress more speedily, the Council shall summon from.all other places as many people in the employ of the Company as they can.muster, making the sailors, too, do such work as they are fitted for, be it digging, felling trees, sawing lumber, or other things. And if the sailors should demand special pay for this (which, however were unreasonable, since the crews of vessels going for salt must also wheel it on board), and refuse their services without it, it shall be permissible for the Commissary and Council to allow them some increase and, if even then they are not satisfied, in order that somehow they may get to work and not remain idle, to promise them.that the Directors here will compensate and satisfy than as in their discretion they see fit. 60 When the "Orangen Boom? returns hither, care shall be taken by the Council to keep there as many men as possible out of those who are best able and most willing to work, provided always that the vessel remain fit for the homeward voyage and can be properly defended. Furthermore, the Commissary and Council shall summon free persons, such as colonists and others who are not in the service of the Company, only if they are willing to work as aforementioned, when they shall be given proper wages, tO‘Vit, as a strong, healthy man 8 stivers a day and his beard, and‘women and childred in proportion. And should the Indians also be willing to work, they shall be paid half as much, in the same manner as the colonists and others, being given for their work some trading goods reckoned at about what they cost here in this country, and then at the rate of 2 stivers a day; for example, for a hatchet that costs 1% stivers here, a man will have to work 7 days. But herein.the Commissary and Council.may exercise their discretion, acting according to the circumstances with an eye to the least expense and to the best interests of the Company.1 The fort on which all the available labor was to be expended was to be an imposing structure. The outside wall was to be 3,150 feet in circumference, and enclosed by a moat measuring 2000 feet on the long side and 1600 on the two sides running to the open end of the fort which faced the water's edge. This enclosure was to be large enough to house all the inhabitants of the Colony. The settlers were to live inside the fort and go out daily to work on the Company farms, for on Manhattan the Company owned all the land. The houses within the stockade were to be of uniform.size and designed to be of maximum.utility to the Company. The houses, to be occupied by a farmer and his family, were to "adjoin one another, each 25 feet square....The second story of all the adjoining houses, nine feet high and 25 feet square, shall throughout be reserved for the use of the Company to store therein at first all provisions belonging to the Company.abut the garrets above the second story shall be for the use of the respective houses....From.his own house lDOCBo 3.02:0 10-! Rothe, PP. 136-9. 61 the Conissary must be able to go into all the lofts...along the entire street, doors to be made from one into the other."2 All the other structures surrounding as well as inside the fort were to be of similar design and usefulness. The public build- ings were to be designed in a like mnner, but not of the same size. They were to include a church, a school, and a market place. The interiors of the buildings were to be left incomplete, to be finished by the tenants. The work thus saved could be applied to the sizable task of completing the outer works. It seems that the structure of the dimension prescribed was a monumental task for the population of the colony to execute. The ’ mimem free population was reported to be no more than 270 persons at any time during the years prior to 1630. In fact the figures given by Vassenaer for the year 1625 indicate that the population amounted to a mere two hundred souls.3 It is not likely that there were more than one or two hundred Company employees present. Then, when considering the number of exemptions from work, the number of available construction workers was diminished notably. The total might have been.around 150 to 200 workers who were not overly enthusiastic about working for the Company. The Company officials in low letherlands intended to build this fortress with the avail- able labor other than farmers. At the same time that the fort was to be begun, twelve farms were supposed to be laid out so as to give selected farmers plots containing 151:» acres according to the measurement of the time which was given in "morgens". Two special 2Docs. Rel. New Neth., pp. 136-9. 371—assenaer, Barr. New Neth., p. 82. 62 farms were to be set aside, one for each succeeding commander or governor, and one for each succeeding Commissary. These two farms were to contain 225 acres each. In all only twelve farms were laid out at this time. With the remaining ten farms, the following disposition was to be made. Two farms of 15h acres were reserved for each succeeding Pastor and Subcommissary, five were assigned to "Head Farmers”, who operated the farms for the Company, and were paid on shares, and the remaining three farms were to be disposed of in an undetermined fashion. Nothing in the instructions indicates what was to become of thom.ezcept that they were to be held open until additional farmers arrived. Presumably, this meant head farmers from.the old country, for there were more than enough colonists to take up that land. There were at least 30 families of Walloons plus some other families that came on the ships arriving in 1625. There was a singular lack of provisions made for the benefit of the colonists. They were provided for only after all the Company personnel were taken.care of, both as regards housing and land. Only a few, if any, colonists received any land to work. ‘Vith regard to the housing, the Company personnel were to receive the best avail- able, and the colonists what was left. "With regard to the dwellings of the farmers, we deem it advisable that ten.houses be taken in hand first, according with the specifications of model D, and that for each house, including the court yard and garden back to the surrounding ditch, there shall be allowed 200 feet, and also 200 feet frontage on the esplanade of the castle, in all 200 square feet. (This obviously 63 was intended to be 200 feet square). The first five of these houses shall be drawn for by the five head-farmers, and the remaining houses may beuused by the Foreman of the Commissary and the Comforter of the sick.” It was the intention of the‘Hest India Company to house the remainder of the Colonists and population inside the fort with a very small plot of ground about their dwelling. As already pointed out the houses were to be 25 feet square and be situated on a lot 25 feet wide and 30 to 50 feet in depth. These were intended to accomr modate the Colonists until such time as they might be able to return to their homesteads. The set of plans which envisioned an installation of such magnitude must be regarded as a mere expression of the Company intentions as of 1625 rather than as something that would eventually be realized. Once the colonists were confined to this narrow strip of land, there was little the Company could have done to stimulate their ambition but give them.grants of land here on the island. But this the Company was unwilling to do. Hence with a reluctant labor force the proposed project was far from a reality. Construc- ton of the fort on the scale proposed.was never accomplished. Some authorities claim.that the outer ramparts were actually begun, but were abandoned in favor of a smaller version of the original. We do know for certain, however, that the smaller version of the fort was not completed in 1629. In the Charter of Freedoms and Exemptions for the Patroons it is clearly stated that the Company “noes. R01. New Neth., pp. lie-u. 6h would complete the fort on Manhattan Island. There was a rather marked contrast between what the Directors must have envisioned and what actually resulted from their careful planning. In this period after the move to the island the whole colonial effort seemed to bog down. In Spite of the elaborate plans and the vigor with which they were to have been pursued, the colonists and the colony in general suffered from want of basic necessities. This, in addition to bad management seems to have led to a general condition of lawlessness and contempt for regulations. Both food and shelter were in short supply as late as 1628. The huts of bark and branches which the colonists hastily erected when they were first forced onto the island still remained as late as the and of the summer, 1628. At that time the first minister of religion reported that "they are beginning to build new houses in place of the hovels and holes in which heretofore they had 5 huddled rather than dwelt." Food production was equally insufficient for the needs of the populace. Of the twelve farms which had been contemplated only six were in production in 1627. Issack de Rasiere, the Commissary described the farm situation at that time as follows: The six farms...four of which lie along the River Hellgate, stretching to the south side of the island have at least 60 morgms (lh8 acres) of land ready to be sown with winter seed, which at most will have been ploughed eight times. But as the greater part must have some manure, in as much as it is exhausted by the wild herbage, I am afraid that all will not be sown: and the more so, as the cultivators are hired." 5"Jonas Michaelius to Jan Foreest" August 8, 1628, Manhattan _i_n_ 1628, Dingman Versteeg, ed. (New York, 1901;), p. 69. Hereafter cited "Jonas Michaelius to Jan Foreest". "Issack de Rasiere to Samuel Blonnnaert", 1628, l_\I_. _Y_. {ii—st. 92;. (1849), New Series, II, p. 345. Also found in Narr. New Neth., p. 104. 65 The inability to get farms into production, as de Rasiere suggeststas at least partially due to Company ownership. There were also other reasons given, namely that the workers were too poorly fed to be ambitious, and that they were unconcerned and lazy. It is difficult to say which was the most important factor. The three together, however, made for a dismal farm.outlook. Conditions seemed favorable for good farmdng yet the colony was unable to produce its own needs. "The ground is fertile enough to reward labor, but they must clear it well....Until now there has been distress because many people were not very industrious, and also did not obtain proper sustenance for want of bread and 7 other necessaries", thus reported Jonas Hichaelius. Yet we know from.the enthusiastic reports of the'Valloons at Port Orange that they were able enough to produce if they were working on their own lands. The six farms mentioned by de Rasiere were owned by the Company and operated by hired superintendents, or head farmers. In general they were reported to be an inept lot. Both de Rasiere and Jonas Michaelius complained about the way they carried on.their duties and the farming picture in general. ‘Vith regard to the lands, they will be all right in time, but greater diligence will have to be applied than has hitherto been done, under the superintendence and management of sober, industrious persons, of whom, may God better it, there are a great lack here. At times I cannot sufficiently wonder at the lazy unconcern of many persons, both farmers and others, who are willing enough to draw their rations and pay in return for doing almost nothing, without examining their consciences or considering their bounden duty and what they promised to do upon their engagement. And whereas this should be communicated in more detail, I refer your Honors to the letter of Minuit, who 7Jonas Michaelius, Narr. New Neth., p. 132. 66 tells me that he is writing your Honors privately about these matters, as touching his office, which I have often enough urged him to do , in order that your Honors might for once be thoroughly informed on the subject.8 The Reverand Michaelius confirmed the condition described above in a letter he wrote in August of 1628 but with some hope for the future. Everything begins to succeed now better than before, for much labor and expense have been in vain....Some Directors and Heads, by bad management, have rather kept back than helped the people and the country, and many among the comon people would have liked to make a living, and even to get rich in idleness rather than by hard work, saying they had not come to work 3 that as far as working is concerned they might have stayed at home, and that it was all one whether they did much or little, if only in the service of the Company. Such expressions were the burden of the song one heard all day long. And this sort of people are all, in the course of time, shipped home as useless ballast.9 This unfortunate condition on the farms led to a shortage of food. Instead of the colony becoming self-sufficient it continued to rely on shipments from home, and in some cases, on what could be purchased from friendly Indians. The need for farmers was described by Reverand Michaelius: "We need nothing so much as horses and cows and industrious workers.. .in order that we may produce sufficient dairy products and crops....Ten or twelve farmers, with cattle and land in proportion, would be'sufficient to help us out of all 10 difficulty.” But until such time, he complained: The rations which were given out here, and charged for high enough, are all hard stale food, such as men are used to aboard ship, and frequently not very good, and even so one cannot obtain as much as he desires, (even) of this hard fare of beans and gray peas, which are hard enough, barley, stock fish....I have now ordered from Holland almost all necessaries; and I has to pass through the winter (1628) with hard and scanty food. 8Docs. Rel. New Neth., pp. 207-8. 9Jona's Michaelius to Jan Foreest, pp. 71-2. l°Ibid., p. 65. ”Jonas Michaelius, Narr. New Neth., p. 130. 67 The foregoing statements are surprising, not so much for what they said but for something that was not said. The need for twelve farmers comes as a shock when one realizes that there were present on the island some thirty families of Walloons who had demonstrated their ability to farm while they were in the outpost settlements from 162: to 1626. Yet the Commissary and the Minister petitioned the directors in Amsterdam for additional farmers. The colonists who might have provided the necessary farm product if they had been given land were thus forced to use their resourcefulness to maintain a bare existence until they could once again resume work on their farms at the outposts, if they were willing to wait on the uncertain day. The greatest assets that the Company had in the New world were thus converted into liabilities, for the Company was obliged to feed them from their inadequate supplies of hard rations. Some of the colonists, who were better acquainted with frontier life, found it necessary to procure food from friendly Indians. To do this they obtained strings of coral beads which as the Dutch . discovered made excellent trading goods . The colonists purchased the beads from the Comissary and exchanged them for corn, fish and other things . DeRasiere noted that there was a substantial demand for the beads for this purpose. Thus, the ingenious frontiersmen probably fared better than did the Company servants and the ministers . The hard life led by the people on huhattan, the bad manage- ment that was said to exist, and the natural atmosphere of freedom that is characteristic of the frontier led to a disregard and contempt for the Company and its regulations. An independent attitude had developed during the administration of Verhulst when some of the settlers were far removed from the administrator and even among those who were in the vicinity of Verhulst and the Council. Accord- ing to the charges against him, Verhulst was interested in enforcing only those rules which pleased him. As a result a certain feeling described as "free coming and going" developed. This condition plagued the succeeding administration. De Rasiere reported the state of affairs to Amsterdam in September, 1626: Your Honors will kindly have Advocate Homel draw some disposi- tions according to the style and usage in such utters in the city of Amsterdam, in order that we may regulate ourselves accordingly when the occasion presents itself. As the people here have become quite lawless, owing to the bad government hitherto prevailing, it is necessary to administer some punishment with kindness in order to keep them in check, to break them of their bad habits, and to make them learn to understand their bounden duty and respect they owe your Honors both in writing and speaking, which cannot easily be done unless you Honors provide some fine or penalty in the utter. As they have heretofore been very harshly ruled by Verhulst, and that without any legal formality, but merely upon his own authority, they deem it very strange that we now begin to inquire into their affairs and that they are summoned before the court to defend their cause. They consider that great injustice is done to them if they are ordered to speak of your Honors with reverence and without using such profane words as they have heretofore been accus- tomed to use and as have been listened to with deaf ears and been allowed to pass without their being punished therefor. Only that was punished which offended Verhulst or his dignity, not according to law but according to his pleasure .12 The net result of the Company's hopes for the new Fort Amsterdam was that instead of establishing a thriving colony that would induce new settlers to come over, it had the effect of discouraging some of the original group who braved the wilderness in the outposts in 1621:. Of the original group of thirty families of Walloons an undisclosed 12Docs. Rel. New Neth., pp. 187-8. 69 number were returning home for one reason or another during the summer of 1628.13 The decision to leave must have been carefully weighed against the prospect of staying on in.New Netherland, for the return trip was an eight-week voyage under favorable conditions. Very often passengers on these voyages suffered severe discomfort as well as contracting beri-beri and scurvy. It must have been no light cause that brought about such a decision. This decision ‘without doubt indicates that the state of progress in New Netherlands as far as the colonists who originally case were concerned. It was not a case of ignorance of what a successful colonial venture needed, for‘Uassenaer had pointed out that for the pros- perity and advancement of the settlement "it is highly necessary that those sent out be first provided with.means of support and defense, and that being freeman, they be settled there on a free tenure; and that all they work for and gain.be thzirs to dispose of and to transfer according to their pleasure."l In the first mentioned requirement the Company did well under the circumstances, but in the others it was seriously lacking. Success depended upon all, not Just one of the requirements so ably stated. It is evident that the venerable directors did not heed‘Wassenaer's admonition. 13JonasIMichaelius, Narr. New Neth., p. 125. assenaer, Narr. New. Neth., p. 76. 70 CHAPTER V The preceding chapter indicated that, after 1626, the settlers in New Netherlands had little cause to be encouraged. The confine- ment to mnhattan virtually stifled their desire to continue the struggle for existence on the frontier. For them New Netherlands held little promise, except for a few of the more courageous. Perhaps the next question ought to be, what did the colony promise the investors in the Dutch West India Company stock? what were the prospects as far as the business enterprise was concerned? This can be most readily discovered by investigating the possible areas of profit opened to the Company, or the possible trade that might be developed. That will be the proposition this chapter will attempt to answer. Under the control of a commercial trading company, it is reas- onable to assume that the item of trade would rank high on the scale of importance in any colony or settlement. Since the West India Company was a Joint stock company it had to concern itself with returning profits to the stockholders. Since the Directors were the large holders of equity, they would press as hard as possible to increase profits. The attitude of the directors of the Company in this respect is indicated by the following admonition to their colonists and officers in New Netherlands: ...one and all,...sha11 promise the Council upon their solemn oath that they shall, each in matters entrusted to his care, look after the Company's interests, manage their farms, exercise trade and perform their labors with the greatest profit to the Company and least expense, warn the Council of all loss reported to them or to be feared, and conduct themselves in all things as good and faithful subjects are bound to do.1 lDocs. Rel. New Neth., p. 129. 71 In New Netherlands there were two possible sources of wealth that would measure up to the'West India Company's standards. They were minerals and the fur trade. But in that part of America occupied by the Dutch there were no known minerals in quantities sufficient to make their extraction worth while. The only sources of wealth then.was the fur trade and a small revenue from.forest products. The latter, of course, was never very remunerative, but was essential in Company shipbuilding. The hope of discovering deposits of minerals or precious stones was given up only after considerable study and effort had been expended upon it in New Netherlands. The Directors offered induce- ments to any discoverer of minerals or marketable products. They offered a one-tenth share to the discoverer of a saleable goods ”for the period of the first six consecutive years, to be reckoned from.the day on.which the Company took over and commenced to exploit the same."2 This small payment was intended as a reward for discovery. The Company reserved to itself all rights to such wealth: "All minerals, newly discovered or still to be discovered.mdnes of gold, silver, copper or any other metal, as well as of precious stones, such as diamonds, rubies, and the like, together with the pearl fishery, shall be allowed to be worked by the Company's men only."3 Generosity was never a mark of the Dutch commercial.men of the Seventeenth Century. In the event that their inducements were not sufficient to stimulate search for minerals, the Company sent out its own agents to carry on the search. And even in this respect, the venerable 2Ibid., p. 13. 31bid., p. 10. 72 directors sent detailed instructions as to how the search was to be carried on. In the orders to verhulst we find the following 1 directions: He shall have Peter Minuit and other whom he shall deem.fit investigate what minerals and crystals there may be both on the North River and the South River, and to that end have the mountains in which such are supposed to be inspected all around, causing holes to be dug, first at the foot, then half way up, and finally at the top of the mountains, in order to see what they contain, sending us several samples of each.mineral that looks promising, and ike- wise of dyes, drugs, gums, herbs, plants, trees, and flowers. He shall cause diligent inquiry to be made among the Indians whether there are no sulphur or salt mines, or whether any of the Indians have anything that looks like metal, such as, gold, silver, copper, iron, lead, etc., asking them.where they got it.5 They left nothing to chance or individual discretion. All their solicitude, however, was for naught for New Netherlands contained no such products. However, the dauntless directors were not to be denied with- out having given everything a consideration. They were determined to find some product that would place the Colony on a paying basis. They therefore turned their attention to other commodities in which the Dutch had long been the leaders, namely fishing and salt trade. In the latter, the Dutch seamen had been traveling to Punto del Rey under considerable risk from Spanish ships of war. The trade to Punto del Rey was shortly cut off completely. Regarding the possibility of profitable fisheries they were requested to find out if there were any "suitable fish to be caught that could be dried or salted...and send over some of each sort, dried or salted." Also he was to see if there were any oysters...there in which pearl might be found, and whether there are no suitable places for “Ibid” p. 75. SIbid., p. 75. 73 6 making salt pans." However, all of these alternatives were also to be denied theme They could never hope to compete with the cod fishing which was already being exploited by Europeans off the Grand Banks. There was one resource in.which the New World abounded - timber of all sorts. The directors did not fail to recognize this. They therefore sent ordersto the colony to the effect that He (the governor) is especially to look out for the elm.trees, from which to saw lumber for gun rests and gun carriages, five inches thick and ten to thirteen feet long, and if it cannot be sewn so quickly, to send over the logs, and further to load the vessels as far as possible with all kinds of lumber in order not to have them.return empty, even if they should, for want of better, be laden with axe-handles and firewood. Nor shall he omit, if there be plenty of hazelnuts to send some over, if there be wal- nuts, to see whether some oil cannot be pressed out of thems7 In order to comply with this order all that was required was to set up the mill and hire the labor to carry and to cut lumber. This was beginning to be done in 1628 at the expense of such vitally important projects as building homes and shelter for the colonists. The minister of religion reported that year that "They are also cutting wood and erecting another mill for the purpose of exporting to the Fatherland whole cargoes of timber fit for building houses and ships." But at the same time he pointed out the need for the colony in respect to labor. "For building purposes there is a greater lack of laborers than materials...Ve need nothing so much as...industrious workers for the building of houses and fortresses, 8 who later could be employed in farmdng...." But nevertheless the work for export went forward. 61bid., p. 76. 71bid., p. 71. Jonas MHchaelius to Jan.Foreest", pp. 65, 69. 71» When all these possible sources of revenue failed to produce profits, the Directors turned in another direction - toward some sort of a cash crop. This was a logical alternative for the Netherlands imported a great share of her food stuffs, especially grain which she received from Prussia and Poland. If such creps would be raised in New Netherlands and exchanged for manufactured goods, the Dutch would have improved their position considerably. If not cereals, then perhaps they might develop a trading commodity, or at least something for home consumption to defray part of the costs of buying from foreign nations. To this end, they sent over samples of all sorts of food products, in the hope that one of them might be profitable. Each kind was to be planted in its proper season and in different conditions, and the results studied to see where and how the plants grew best. At the same time they ordered colonial officials to see if the wild grapes growing there might not be suitable for making brandywine, vinegar or verjuice, and if not, procure some vines from Spain or the Canary Islands. The degree of the disappointment in this last attempt was expressed by the Assembly of the XIX themselves. In a rqmrt to the States General of the Netherlands they complained that "this district, which we have named New Netherlands, although it ought to be, in point of climate, as warm and as well adapted for the cultivation of fruits at least, as the farthest frontiers of France toward Spain: yet it has been found much colder, and as much subject to frost and other inconveniences as these; nay, as 75 more northern countries. The people conveyed by us thither, have therefore, found but scanty means of livelihood up to the present time 3 and have not been of any profit, but a draw back, to this 9 Company. " The scanty means of livelihood mentioned here was the result of the move to Fort Amsterdam. In the days prior to the incident at Fort Orange the Colonists fared well, for they possessed their own land. and some enthusiasm for working it, as the Halloons testified in their letters. However, once the entire population moved to lanhattan onto Company land that enthusiasm were off rapidly. In fact numerous of the Walloon families requested to be sent house. The prospects of working for the Company and not being free to trade with the Indians on an equal basis with Company agents reduced the prospects of prosperity considerably. Hence, even the farms on the island were not adequately productive to supply the needs of the settlers . There remained but one source of profit to the Company, the fur trade. This is the element of the New Netherlands trade most often talked about by historians. Usually they point out that the trade was brisk and that there were large returns on furs due to the ready demand for furs in Europe. The Dutch marketed their furs at the Leipzig and Frankfurt fairs. What is not common know- ledge is that the fur trade was restricted as far as the colonists were concerned. It was not until 1638 that it became free to all. The fur trade was the West India Company's only source of revenue, with the exception of some lumber which was shipped home. As its 9"XII to States General," October 23, 1629, _lg. _Y_. g_o_l_. Docs., p. 39. 76 source of revenue the Company protected it as best it could, but even at that it barely balanced the hmports into the colony when averaged over the six year period for which statistics are avail- able. In endeavoring to restrict the trade for itself the Company encountered.many problems. Under the Provisional Regulations governing the first contingent the colonists were permitted to carry on the fur trade with no restrictions. They were free "to carry on and prosecute the inland trade without obJection on the part of anyone, on the express condi- tion that they...sell the goods they have purchased or collected to no one but the Company's agents."10 This provisional arrangement was made until other arrangements were made as dictated by necessity. The necessity was not long in coming. The following year the original instruction.was amended to the disfavor of the colonist traders. The new rule attempted to reduce the colonists to the level of trappers and hunters, for they would be unable to benefit from.dealings with the Indians. Since they were to be compelled to "deliver up the said skins and goods to the Company at the price for which we obtain them.at the trading-places from.the Indians, and...shall not permit them, by selling the skins (to others), to make the Company pay a higher price for them."11 Under such conditions all trading matters were to be handled by the Co-issary and the Governor. The whole program was under their direction. And as indicated earlier this was to be one of their primary duties. The two highest officials were favored with an lopoca. Rel. New Neth., p. 10. llIbid., p. 67. 77 incentive to increase the trade in pelts. Whichever of the two arranged a particular transaction received a commission of an unspecified amount depending on the type of pelt. As a result of such a system, diligent effort would be made to see that peltry was not obtained by outsiders, who once they gained an inroad into the trade, might bid up the price. Some difficulty, however, was encountered along these lines as well as with the colonists them- selves who worked at getting higher prices. From the very beginning of his term of office as the Company representative de Rasiere encountered difficulties. The "rough and unrestrained" colonists described by Rev. Michaelius knew how to handle such affairs. De Rasiere wrote to the Directors of his plight, and theirs. With great trouble and.many threats I obtained for cash from the colonists at Fort Orange 305 beaver and he otter. I had to pay for each merchantable beaver two guilders and for a good otter two guilders and five stivers....They were much discontented even then, having been stirred up, they said they wished to send the skins to the honorable Directors, who would give them three guilders for each skin good or bad....In order not to have the skins go to strangers, I was therefore Obliged to pay them.two guilders for each good merchantable skin, after consultation with Minuit, who for the sake of all concerned advised me to do so. It was never made clear who the strangers were who were offering the high prices to the colonists. De Rasiere reported another incident which occurred, as near as can be ascertained, at Fort Amsterdam. This incident involved the wife of one of the blacksmiths in the service of the Company. De Rasiere recounted it as follows: "It happened one day that the wife of Wolfert Gerritsz came to me with two otters, for which I l2Ibid., pp. 215-6. The mention of the "colonists at Fort Orange” probably means ”colonists from Fort Orange." This letter was written September 25, 1626. The colonists left the Fort in the spring of that year 0 78 offered her three guilders, ten stivers. She refused and asked five guilders, whereupon I let her go, this being too much. The wife of Jacob Lourissz, the smith, knowing this, went to her and offered five guilders, which Wolfert's wife again told me. There- upon, to prevent the otters from.being purloined, I was obliged to give her the five guilders."l3 This incident together with the other compelled de Rasiere to ask for help from.the Directors. In order to prevent further occurrence of similar nature, he asked "should your Honors desire to remedy such and other similar practices, it will be necessary to send me and the Shout (sheriff)hother instructions and to order the Council to assist us better."1 This suggests that the practice of bidding up the price of pelts was a common practice, at least for a time. The Company was well aware that the valuable furs would attract outsiders and that a clandestine trade might easily develop. They therefore made provisions to forestall the possibility. In so doing they gave the colonists the lever they needed to open the Company purse. If the interloper had a permit to travel in.New Netherlands and engaged in the forbidden trade, his permit was to be immediately suspended. If the interloper was outside the Jurisdiction of the Company, then the Commissary was ordered to bid up the price to destroy the market for him, As soon as the colonists discovered another buyer, de Rasiere was in difficulty, as indeed, he was most of the time in.natters of trade. 13Ibid., pp. 216-9. luIbid., pp. 216-19. 79 However, there are indications that De Rasiere was finally able to bring the fur trade under control. Governor Bradford of the Plymouth Colony felt that the Dutch had done a good job in this matter. He remarked that "the Dutch have reduced their trade to some order, and confined it only to the Company, which heretofore was spoiled.by their seamen and interlepers."1 . The fur trade remained the exclusive privilege of the West India Company until 1638. But even in the hands of the Company the fur trade remained a source or difficulty. At one point it caused some friction between the colony of Plymouth and New Netherlands. In the years after the incident at Fort Orange the Dutch continued to send their agents into the Connecticut River region. It was here that Dutch- English conflicts had their beginnings. They later culminated in the conquest of New Netherlands by the Duke of Ybrk. The English made known their complaints in the course of negotiations conducted between de Rasiere and Governor Bradford of Plymouth relative to inter-colonial trade. There was an exchange of letters and even a personal visit by de Rasiere to Governor Bradford at Plymouth in 1627. In March of that year de Rasiere had written inquiring about the possibility of setting some sort of trade in metion. Bradford was amenable to the suggestion but under the circumstances wrote the following: "...this year we are fully supplied with all necessaries, both for clothing and other things; but that it may so fall out, that hereafter we shall deal with you, if your rates are reasonable.... -We desire to know how you will take beaver by the pound, and otter 15"Governor Bradford to Sir Ferdinando Gorges," June 15, 1627, Vignaud Pamphlets (University of Michigan Library), p. 366. These are not published pamphlets. 80 by the skin, and how you will deal percent for other commodities, and what you can furnish us with; as likewise what commodities fron.us may be acceptable with you, as tobacco, fish, corn, or other things and what price you will give." But in the same communication.we find the following also: "...we desire that you would forebear to trade with the natives in this bay, and river of Narraganset and Sawanes, which is as it were at our doors. The which if you do, we think no other English will go about any way to trouble you or hinder you; which otherwise are resolved to solicit his Majesty for redress, if otherwise they cannothelp themselves.'16 Later that same y...- the friction between the two settlements appeared to be getting worse. De Rasiere had visited Plymouth in October. It seems that Bradford's grievance had not been satis- fied nor had trade relations improved. Under the date of October ' 5, 1627,3radford wrote to the Lords of the‘west India Company that they would be unable to conclude any agreement for this year for supplies as they had sent their factors to England and Holland to procure supplies and therefore would not know until their return what would be needed. At the same time they expressed doubt as to any future possibility of an agreement, and so they informed the Lords of the west India Company: "We desire your Honors, that you would take into your wise and honorable considerations, that which we conceive may he a hindrance to this accomodation (trade agreement), and may be a means of future evil if it be not prevented, namely that you clear the title of your planting in these parts, which his Majesty hath, by patent, granted to divers of his nobles l6"VilliamBradford to the Directors and Council of New Nether- lands”, March 19, 1627, Ibid., p. 361. and subjects of quality; lest it be a bone of division in these stirring evil thnes."l7 The parts referred to in this instance were the area about the Connecticut River. Later the dispute deve10ped into an English claim to other regions and resulted in the conquest of the whole of New Netherlands in 166A by the Duke of York. It was the Dutch pursuit of the fur trade that began the rumblings which ultimately would cause the downfall of the Dutch effort in North America. It is doubtful if the value of the fur trade obtained at the expense of good relations with Plymouth was worth the ultimate cost. The entire fur trade, which was practically the only source of revenue, failed to excite the directors of the'West India Company. The value of the goods imported into the colony and of the furs exported were recorded by John de Last, eminent historian and also director of Amsterdam.0hamber of the West India Company; The following table indicates the values in question as recorded by 18 de Last. Year Beaver Otter Exports Imports Balance of l62h 4,000 700 27,125 25,569 Exports 1625 5 .295 #63 35,828 8,772 .13.! 1626 7,258 857 h5,050 20,384 Guilders 1627 7.250 370 12,730 56.170 1628 6,951 73h 61,075 none 1629 5,913 681 62,185 55,228 3h3s993 166,673 177,320 While the net balance of exports seems to be a rather sizeable sum it represents an average annual balance of approximately 29,53h guilders per year. This the directors did not regard as particularly encouraging. The XIX reported to the States General that "the trade 17"William Bradford to the Lords of the West India Company", October 5, 1627, Ibid., p. 365. 18John de Laet, History 9;; the West India Company, Ibid., p. 385. 82 carried on there in peltries has been right advantageous; but one year against another we can, at most, bring home only 50,000 guilders."19 This amount seems slight Justification for the application of such a large quantity of resources as the Company had tied up in New Netherlands. Following 1629, the Company inaugurated a new policy designed to offset much of the cost of the colony without losing the profits of the fur trade. A select group of directors in.the Amsterdam Chamber petitioned the States General to grant them.a charter of privileges that would.make any enterprising directors who met the terms of the agreement a feudal lord over a huge domain in the New ‘world. The grants became known as patroonships and the document liming them.possible was the Charter of Freedom.and Exemptions to Patroons. It took effect June 6, 1629. Its significant provisions were the following: All such shall be acknowledged patroons of New Netherlands who shall undertake, within the space of four years next after they have given notice to any Chamber of the Company here, or to the Commander of the Council there, to plant a colony there of fifty souls, upward of 15 years old; one-fourth part within one year and the remainder within three years after sending the first, making together four years, to the full number of 50 persons.... They shall, from the time they make known the situation of the places where they propose to settle colonies, have the preference over all others of the absolute property of such lands as they shall have chosen.... The Patroons, by their agents, shall and may be permitted, at such places as they shall settle their colonies, to extend their lumits four leagues along the shore on one side of a navigable river or two leagues on each side of the river, and so far into the country as the situation of the occupiers shall permdt.... 19"Assembly of XIX to States General," October 23, 1629, E. I. 991:. DOCBc, I’ppe 39")‘1‘00 83 They shall forever possess and enjoy all the lands lying within the aforesaid limits, together with the fruits, crops, Idneral, rivers and fountains thereof, and the high, middle and low Jurisdiction, fisheries, fowling and grinding to the exclus- ion of all others, to be holden from.the Company as a perpetual inheritance, without its over devolving again to the Company.... And in case any one prosper so mmch as to found one or more towns, he shall have power and authority to establish officers and magis- trates there, and to make use of such title in his Colony as he sees fit according to the quality of the persons. Whosoever shall settle any colony outside of the limits of Nhnhattan.Island, shall be obliged to satisfy the Indians for the land they shall settle upon, and they may extend or enlarge the limits of their colony if they settle a proportionate number of colonists thereon. The Company'will endeavour to supply the colonists with as many blacks as it possibly can, on the condition hereafter to be made, without however being bound to do so to a greater extent or for a longer time than it shall see fit. The Company promises to finish the fort on the island of E lanhattan, and to put it in a posture of defense without delay....20 The Company, much like the colonists, did not make signifi- cant progress in New Netherlands. The Company's welfare in this venture was inextricably bound to that of the colonists. If the colonists did not prosper, neither would the Company. This was especially true asalong run consideration. Unfortunately for the Dutch the directors were not aware of the nearness of this rela- tionship, for they failed to ease the burden of the colonist, and thereby denied themselves the loyal services of a large portion of the population. As a result the enterprise faltered and some expedient such as that granted in the Charter of Freedom.and lxemption for the Patroons became necessary. 20"Charter of Freedoms and.Bzemptions for the Patroons," in Rene DOV. BS, PP. 137-1530 A180 found. in “me New Hath.) Ppe 90’96. 8h CONCLUSION In conclusion we can appraise the difficulties in which New Netherlands found itself in the period from 1609 to 1629 as the end product of the economic philosophy of the age. The partici- pation of the Dutch Vest India Company in the affairs of the colony was merely as the instrument of national policy. The States General used the two great trading companies, the East and West India Companies as instruments for carrying out national policy. They vested them with vast powers because the States General felt the colonial problems of the Dutch Empire would be most adequately handled by these huge trading monopolies. The Directors of the West India Company, in turn, used the 4 government of New Netherlands, which they instituted under the grants in their charter, as a means of attaining their objectives-“that of developing as lucrative a trade as possible, regardless of the effects it might have on the settlement or settlers. Any benefits which accrued to the Company and its stockholders were looked upon as highly desirable by the States General of the Netherlands for that was helping them achieve national economic objectives. The inter- locking welfare of these two bodies was in accord with the economic philosophy of mercantilism which developed in Europe at the close of the Middle Ages, and which permeated the policy of most European governments at this time. The doctrine of the mercantile system, stated in its most extreme form, made wealth and money identical and regarded it there- fore as the object of a comnity to so conduct its dealings with other nations as to attract to itself the largest possible share of 85 precious metals. Each country's interest was to export the utmost possible quantities of its own manufactures and to import as little as possible of those of other countries, receiving the difference of the two values in gold and silver. This difference is called the balance of trade, and the governments might resort to all avail- able axpedients...for the purpose of receiving such a balance.1 The use of a commercial trading company for the attainment of the goals of mercantilism in colonial empires is logical. The aim of the private companies could be counted upon to be simdlar to the national aims. The point is that both the mercantilist nation and the business enterprise are interested in as great a quantity of r wealth as Feasible. The system.as applied to a colony required.that the Company attompt to acquire raw materials for manufacture, or other products from.New Netherlands at prices as low as possible so that these goods ‘4 might be resold in the markets of Europe at a profit and thereby result in a favorable balance of payments for the Dutch‘west India Company and the Dutch nation. Therefore, as the Company Directors understood the situation, it would be most prudent to regulate matters in America so as to keep the cost of furs, lumber, and any other product that might be found or developed as low as possible. Such a policy, as we have seen, had a stifling effect on New Netherlands. As a consequence of the mercantilist doctrine, mismanagement, and an unfortunate Indian affair, by far the greater part of the population'was concentrated on.Manhattan Island with very dim prospectefor the future. The colonists were held there under unbear- able restrictions at the convenience of the West India Company and at the expense of the colony as a whole. The entire population did not exceed 270 people. 1Encyclopedia Britannica, Zh'vols. (Chicago, l9h7) XV, p. 261-2. 86 This can be regarded as a rather poor snowing. But for reasons already discussed very few Dutch were willing to risk the uncertainty of an eight-week ocean voyage to face the prOSpect New Netherlands had to offer in 1629. All types of peOple were needed, farmers, smiths, wheelwrights, millers, laborers and what not, but none would come. In the face of this dearth of p0pulation the Dutch West India Company devised a.p1an modified from.the Portuguese system.which had been successfully applied to Madeira, the Azores and Brazil, which was to give hereditary grants or captaincies to courtiers who would settle or improve them. The plan was adopted in 1629 by the Dutch West India Company with the sanction of the States General to make up the deficiencies in population that existed in the New World settlements. The beneficiaries were the members of the Company, more particularly the members of the Amsterdam Chamber. The West India Company Directors did not attempt to conceal the failure of their colonial enterprise in North America. In one of'their communications to the States General dated Octdber, 1629, they admitted that the colony had failed both financially and in population growth.2 Without a population of some size it was easy for the directors to see that prospects for the future were not bright because agriculture and the fur trade were the only available sources of income. And vhat is more, agriculture was not cnly not profitable, it was not feeding the population. This, they pointed out, was a result of the bad climate there. According to their calculations it should have been as warm and mild as southern France, but it was not. All in all, the venture had been an unfortunate mistake. The time was at hand to dispose of the burden if possible. 2See footnote P. 75. 87 The necessary steps to overcome these deficiencies, the States General believed, had been taken earlier that year (1629). On June 7, the "Charter of Freedoms and Exemptions" for the patroons had been granted.3 History has proven how wrong they were. Lack of population continued to plague New Netherlands all through its history. 3"Charter of Freedoms and Exemptions", A. J. F. van Laer, ed. Ren. Bow. MSSJ, pp. 137-153. BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTE Although material on the history of early America abounds, there is a notable scarcity in the one segment that dealt with the Dutch settlement in New York. This is particularily true of the brief period on New Netherland's history from 1609 to 1630. General works dealing with the period of colonization usually pass over these years in a page or two mentioning that the island of Manhattan was purchased in 1626 and begin the story with the founding of the patroonships. The reason for this condition became apparent as soon as research was begun. Meet of the materials that are now available were taken from the Dutch National Archives and from certain other private sources located in Europe. A wealth of’material from the most pertinent sources, records of the Amsterdam Chamber of the West India Company, was destroyed in 1821. The remainder has been hunted out at widely scattered times, and collected in volumes. There is no denying that the sum total of all that is available today does not allow a very comprehensive study of this important period. The sources can be roughly divided into those covering the period from the discovery to 1623, the year the West India Company commenced operations. The other period spanned the years from the first settlement in New Netherlands, l62h to 1629. 89 1609 - 1623 The fragments of information relative to the New Netherlands Company are found in the first pages of Documents Relative t3 t_h_e 15 vols. (Albany, 1856-87), I. While other of the collected sources to be mentioned referred to the New Netherland Company the basic facts are in this volume. The Dutch West India Company, on the other hand, is treated piecemeal in s everal places. However, the most significant pieces, in most respects, are the Documents Relative _t2 the Colonial History 9; _t_h_e_ M 9}; Egg! 33313. For some unknown reason that volume does not contain the charter of the West India Company. The Van Rensselaer Bowier Manuscripts, A. J. F. van Laer, ed. (Albany, 1908) supplied this essential document. The Van Rensselaer papers are an excellent source for the period after 1629. They deal with the Patroonship of Rensselaerswyk. A very unusual volume which proved to be of more interest than practical value because it dealt with materials that are not avail- able on the activities of the West India Company was G. M. Asher, _A_ Bibliographical and Historical Essay 9_n_ Dutch Books and Pamphlets Relating E1 the Dutch West India Company and its Possessions i_n_ Brazil and Angola, etc. (Amsterdam, 1854-67). A critical history of the West India Company would most certainly have to take this volume into account. Hundreds of titles are given along with a brief sketch of each. 90 The works of two historians contemporary with the Company were Nicholaes van Wessenaer, Historisch Verhael, (Amsterdam, l62h-30) and Johan De Laet, 1533 World (Amsterdam, 1625, 1630, 1633, 1611.0). Both are compiled and translated in a very useful volume of the Original Narratives of Early American History Series, Narratives 2; New Netherlands, 1609-166M, J. Franklin Jameson, ed. (New'York, 1908). The works of van wassenaer and De Laet are also published in a rougher translation in Collections of the New York Historical Society, Second Series, 8 vols. (18hl-59), I and II. There are a few passages of Wassenaers WOrks found in the Collections of the New York Historical Society that are not found in Narratives of New Netherlands. .A rare collection of pamphlets containing letters written by William.Bradford of Plymouth Colony and Issack de Rasiere of New Netherlands in which an attempt was made to establish trade relations between the two colonies in 1627, as well as some statistics compiled by De Last on the Nest India Company's trade were discovered in the Vignaud Pamphlets (University of Michigan library). 91 162A - 1630 Without the volume Document§_Relative to New Netherlands, ggggrgg§§§,.a. J. F. van Laer, ed. (San Marino, California, 192M) the sections of this work dealing with New Netherlands woud have been impossible. There is no other single source which provides as much information on these formerly obscure years as do the documents in this collection. There are only fifty copies of the book in existence. With these documents as basic information the following letters were utilized to fill the story. "Issack De Rasiere to Sammuel Blommaert" (1628 2) and "Jonas Michaelius to Adrianius Smoutius" (August 11, 1628) both found in Narratives gf New Netherlands, J. Franklin Jameson, ed. One other letter not included in the Narratives and published by itself has the distinc- tion of being the earliest known letter written from.New Netherlands: "Jonas Michaelius to Jan Foreest", (August 8, 1628) published along with the original Dutch in Manhattan 13.;6gg, Dingham Versteeg, ed. (New YOrk, 19Gb). Both De Last and Nassenaer in their two works provided some references that were used in addition to their treatment of the period prior to 1623. 92 Secondary Sources To the extent that secondary works could be utilized the most valuable were Cambridge Modern History, A. W. Ward, G. W. Prothero, Stanley Leathes, ed., 13 vols. (Cambridge, 1931;), IV: also Samuel G. Nissensen, Patroon's m (New York, 1937). The latter deals with the period that immediately followed that covered here but much of the background material was useful since the book is well documented both as to Rensselaerwyk and the West India Company. Other general works which provided background material were Adrian Barnouw, The Pageant of Netherlands History (New York, 1952): Bernard H. M. Vlekke, Evolutions 93 the Dutch Nation (New York, 19h5); Curtis P. Nettels, Roots 9; American Civilization (New York, 19h7); Iconography _o_f Manhattan Island, I. N. P. Stokes ed., 6 vols. (New York, 1895-28), vol. IV; S. G. Fisher, lien, Women and Mapners in. Colonial Times, 2 vols. (Philadelphia, 1898), Henry G. Bayer, Thg_ Belgians First Settlers in New York and the Middle States (New York, 1925). R3833 USE GNU Demco-293 ”ICH " All Wei/fly (:7 III/1111mm