2,: V1.2? .: .1 , 55.0.5. 1.: (.52.: 2.3.2... xiii .1. i 1.... 1,22: 2... z. 4 5|}. 3.1 r\)~...$.:..u§ii..... 1:: ‘ :k‘uaxrlx. (C(91)). .1: x) 2.. 1.44:. .5. 1 .. .1td...f:5z nah-- 3h :11 L 3: .1. I. .Z .1 a :r. 3 1.3:. 2. 3.. . 3.2.1.3.. 7 1.; MS 985 AND Posrawemocwcg CONTROL. 0/: p it'llilllillllillgllillllll 3129301 r. This is to certify that the thesis entitled ea. arm Ma IN Tum: WIW ETHOr’u/Wc’sflfc' presented by / .7 / {damn-5 M Coir/So V) has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for / . ( £1— degree in L5.— (34/04.; /:/l/(L1’1A// c 24/\ Major professor Date /O*/Y‘ 71 0—7639 MSU is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Institution LHBRARY Michigan State University PLACE IN RETURN BOX to remove this checkout from your record. TO AVOID FINES return on or before date due. DATE DUE DATE DUE DATE DUE MSU Is An Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Institution MMMMA PRE AND POSTEMERGENCE CONTROL OF Poa annua IN TURF WITH ETHOFUNIESATE By Thomas Mark Carlson A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Crop and Soil Sciences 1994 ABSTRACT PRE AND POSTEMERGENCE CONTROL OF Poa annua IN TURF WITH ETHOFUMESATE By Thomas Mark Carlson Ethofumesate is an unique herbicide in that it has both pre and postemergence activity to selectively remove P. annua from desirable turfgrass. This research used various field studies to evaluate postemergence application timings on the reduction of P. annua, injury to desirable turfgrasses, and during renovation. Additional studies compared ethofumesate with other standard preemergence herbicides for P. annua control. Greenhouse studies were utilized to determine the effect of temperatures on ethofumesate efficacy. All combination of rates and timings tested were found to be effective at controlling P. annua. Multiple applications of ethofumesate showed safety on Kentucky bluegrass and creeping bentgrass and the more applications, the greater the reduction in P. annua. Preemergence herbicides provided good control in the fall with ethofumesate being the only exception. Studies indicated freezing temperatures prior to an ethofumesate application are more effective in P. annua reduction than when not subjected to freezing temperatures. ACKNOWLEDGNIENTS I would like to express my sincere thanks for the guidance and support Dr. Bruce Branham gave during my graduate studies. Thanks also to my committee members whose advice and corrections made this thesis possible. Finally, thanks to my family and the guys in the office who made the tough times a little more enjoyable. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LISTOFTABLES..................... vi LISTOFFIGURES.....................viii CHAPTER 1: Abstract.......................1 Introduction......................2 MaterialandMethods.................4 Results........................7 Discussion......................10 LiteratureCited....................20 CHAPTER 2: Abstract.......................22 Introduction......................24 MaterialandMethods.................27 Results........................3O Discussion......................34 LiteratureCited....................44 iv CHAPTER 3: Abstract . Introduction . Material and Methods Results . Discussion . Literature Cited . CHAPTER 4: Abstract . Introduction . Material and Methods Results and Discussion . Literature Cited . 46 .47 49 S3 56 65 66 .67 68 71 84 CHAPTER 1 Table 1. 1 Table 1.2 Table 1.3 Table 1.4 Table 1.5 CHAPTER 2 Table 2.1 Table 2 .2 Table 2.3 Table 2.4 Table 2.5 LIST OF TABLES Ethofumesate treatments for renovation studies Effect of ethofumesate on turf injury and Poa annua control during fairway renovation during 1990 Effect of ethofumesate on turf injury and Poa annua control during fairway renovation during 1991 Effect of ethofumesate on turf injury and Poa annua control during fairway renovation during 1992 Percent Poa annua averaged across-all ethofumesate treatments within each seeding date 1990 Fall ethofumesate application for control of Poa annua 1990 Fall preemergence application for control of Poa annua 1991 Spring preemergence application for control of Poa annua 1991 Fall preemergence application for control of Poa annua 1992 Spring preemergence application for control of Poa annua vi CHAPTER 3 Table 3.1 1990 Multiple ethofumesate applications for safety and Poa annua control Table 3.2 1991 ethofumesate safety on Kentucky bluegrass at fairway height Table 3.3 Ethofumesate safety on bentgrass varieties at greens height Table 3.4 Walnut hills multiple ethofumesate applications CHAPTER 4 Table 4.1 Comparison of summer and fall applications of ethofumesate Table 4.2 Freezing temperatures prior to an application of ethofumesate Table 4.3 Freezing temperatures prior to an application of ethofumesate vii LIST OF FIGURES CHAPTER 2 Figure 2.1 1990—1991 Poa annua germination in response to soil temperature Figure 2.2 1991—1992 Poa annua germination in response to soil temperature CHAPTER 4 Figure 4.1 Study one— clipping weights from Poa annua plants treated with ethofumesate (first mowing) Figure 4.2 Study one— clipping weights from Poa annua plants treated with ethofumesate (final mowing) Figure 4.3 Study two- clipping weights from Poa annua plants treated with ethofumesate (first mowing) Figure 4.4 Study two- clipping weights from Poa annua plants treated with ethofumesate (final mowing) viii Chapter 1 RENOVATION USING ETHOFUMESATE ABSTRACT Most renovations on golf course fairways are done to eliminate Poa annua infested areas. One major objective of a renovation program is to prevent reinvasion of P. annua. Studies were conducted over three years to determine if the application of ethofumesate [2-ethoxy-2, 3-dihydro-3, 3— dimethyl—S—benzofuranyl methanesulfonate] at various rates and times could prevent the reinvasion of P. annua. All combination of rates and timings tested were found to be effective at controlling P. annua. In general, rates of 0.8 kg a.i. ha'l or less applied either two or four weeks after emergence of the bentgrass provided acceptable turf quality with little injury. Turf density was good for most treatment combinations except the ethofumesate applications at seeding and the 1.7 kg a.i. ha‘l rate in 1991. In 1992 percent coverage was weak for most treatments over all seeding dates due to the early, cool fall temperatures resulting in poor growing conditions. Ethofumesate appears to be beneficial in preventing P. annua from reestablishing in a newly seeded bentgrass fairway. 2 INTRODUCTION On most golf courses Poa annua (annual bluegrass) is considered an undesirable weed. Two subspecies of P. annua exist; one is an annual, P. annua var annua (L.) Timm, and the other is a perennial, P. annua var reptans (Hausskn.) Timm. The annual has an upright growth habit, no or few secondary tillers per culm, prolific seedhead production, little rooting on the culm/tiller, six nodes or less per culm/tiller and the seed has a dormancy period (Beard 1973; Gibeault 1974). The perennial has a creeping growth habit, numerous secondary tillers per culm, less seedhead production, several adventitious roots on a prostrate culm/tiller, greater than six nodes per culm/tiller and no seed dormancy (Beard 1973; Gibeault 1974). Many golf course superintendents and golfers have had to learn to live with P. annua. If a golf course has predominantly P. annua, the cultural management of the course will be designed to benefit the P. annua. Many drawbacks are associated with P. annua such as the need for high fertility, disease and insect susceptibility, and high moisture requirement. These drawbacks are causing turf managers to attempt to remove P. annua. Cultural and chemical techniques exist to selectively remove P. annua but progress can be slow (Kageyama and Widell 1989). Another option is to renovate the existing turf stand. 3 The renovation process typically results in the closure of the course for at least 3-4 weeks. The majority of renovations are primarily done to remove P. annua from the tees, fairways and/or greens. While the purpose of renovation is to remove existing P. annua, one would also like to prevent the reinvasion of P. annua. In Michigan the recommendation has been to begin renovation in mid- August and have a well established stand of bentgrass prior to the fall germination of P. annua. This procedure can result in interference with play during the peak of the season, increased demands on personnel in the peak of the maintenance season, and P. annua may germinate all season long (Chapter 2) contrary to what was previously thought (Beard 1973). It would be highly desirable to delay renovation into the late summer, prevent some of the inconveniences, and prevent reestablishment of P. annua in the newly established bentgrass. The purpose of this research was to develop a renovation procedure for fairways that would minimize the re—encroachment of P. annua into the newly established turf. Ethofumesate was chosen because of its selectivity for P. annua (Ball and Roberts 1974; Demoeden and Turner 1988; Dickens 1981; Shearman 1986) and safety on creeping bentgrass (Demoeden and Turner 1986; Johnson et al. 1989). 4 MATERIAL AND METHODS Field studies were conducted for three years and evaluations were conducted from the initiation of the study through the following spring. The first study began in the fall of 1989 and two additional studies were begun in the fall of 1990 and 1991. The research site was located at the Hancock Turfgrass Research Center, East Lansing, Michigan. The site consisted of 70- 80% P. annua since 1981 ensuring a large seed bank. Prior to seeding, plots were sprayed with glyphosate [Tsopropylamine salt of N—(phosphonomethyl) glycine] at 1.7 kg a.i. ha“. One week after the glyphosate application the area was verticut with a vertical mower (Ryan Ren- o—Thinll ) in three directions to remove much of the dead plant material and break up the soil surface. This dead plant material was removed from the plot area before seeding. Three seeding times were used in each study. Seeding dates for 1989 were August 18, September 1, and September 15; August 16, August 31, and September 13 for 1990; and August 15, August 29, and September 12 for 1991. Penncross creeping bentgrass was seeded at 49 kg ha". The area was fertilized at seeding with 49 kg N ha‘1 as 12—12—12 and then 24 kg N ha'1 ‘ Cushman Inc., 9036 Ryan, PO. Box 82409, Lincoln, NE 68501 5 applied as urea every two weeks for a total of three applications. Plots were mowed three times weekly during the growing season and as needed during late fall and early spring, at a height of 1.3 cm. Mowing did not begin after seeding until seedlings were well established. Each seeding date was watered daily until seed germinated and then only as needed. A split plot design was used with three replications. Main plots were seeding dates with ethofumesate treatments as subplots. Each subplot was 1.2 x 1.8 In and received ethofumesate treatments at various rates and weeks after emergence (WAE) of the bentgrass (Table 1.1). No additional pesticides were applied to the research area for the duration of the experiment. Treatments were applied with a four nozzle boom—C02 backpack sprayer delivering 514 L/ha at 0.28 Mpa. Visual evaluations were used to determine the control of P. annua achieved with the ethofumesate applications and quality of the bentgrass. Control was determined by rating percent P. annua on a 0—100% scale. Quality ratings were taken on a 1—9 scale with a rating higher then 6.5 being acceptable for a golf course fairway. A rating of 1 was worst quality and 9 was best quality. Percent turf cover was evaluated on the last two studies. This was done to see if the application of ethofumesate inhibited germination 6 or rate of cover of the bentgrass. Cover ratings were on 3 0—100% scale. A rating less than 97% would be considered unacceptable in a fairway situation. 7 RESULTS 1989—1990 Field Study Turf treated with ethofumesate did not show evidence of injury over the early and late seeding dates (Table 1.2). The 0.8 kg a.i. ha‘1 4, 6, + 8 weeks after emergence (WAE) along with 0.8 kg a.i. ha‘l 4 WAE + 1.4 kg a.i. ha‘1 6 WAE treatments did cause some unacceptable quality on the 9/1 seeding date. Most treatments provided significant control of P. annua on all seeding dates. The only exception was 0.8 kg a.i. ha" 4 WAE + 1.4 kg a.i. ha’1 6 WAE on the first seeding date. Quality, even though two treatments dropped slightly below unacceptable, recovered nicely during the spring (data not shown). 1990—1991 Field Study Ethofumesate injury to the turf was not observed at any seeding date (Table 1.3). Even though there were significant differences in quality between several treatments, this quality would be judged acceptable under fairway conditions. Again as in the previous year, all treatments having lower quality recovered during the spring (data not shown). P. annua populations were significantly reduced by most treatments over all seeding dates, the only exception being 0.4 kg a.i. ha'1 2 WAE + 0.8 kg a.i. ha'1 5 WAE on the first seeding date. During this field study, the effect of ethofumesate on turfgrass establishment was evaluated. The 0.8 kg a.i. ha‘l at seeding + 30 DAT resulted in poor turfgrass cover on the mid— and late seeding dates, and 1.7 kg a.i. ha'1 2 + 5 WAE had unacceptable cover on all seeding dates. Treatments 10 yielded unacceptable cover only on the latest seeding date 1991—1992 Field Study Treatments on the first seeding date generally exhibited acceptable quality, however, treatments 5, 7, 9, 12, 13, 14, and 18 had unacceptable quality (Table 1.4). On the mid seeding date treatments 9 - 18 gave unacceptable quality. On the last seeding date quality was unacceptable in all plots, including the control plot. Most treatments significantly controlled Poa annua. Two exceptions were treatments 16 and 17 at the early seeding date. Turfgrass cover was generally acceptable on the early seeding date. Only treatments 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, and 18 gave unacceptable percent cover. On the mid-seeding date only the two treatments, with two applications of 0.8 kg a.i. ha'l at four week intervals, resulted in acceptable turf cover. The last 9 seeding date had unacceptable percent cover for all treatments including the control. An unexpected result from all studies was the highly significant effect of seeding date and ethofumesate treatment on the level of P. annua establishment (Table 1.5). The early seeding dates had a higher percentage of P. annua than the later seeding dates. 10 DISCUSSION Most treatments applied at or below the label rate of 0.8 kg a.i. ha" at two or four WAE with various application intervals had acceptable quality. The only exception was that the late seeding date in 1992 did exhibit undesirable injury. With the combination of cold temperatures and herbicide applications, seedlings never really developed and poor quality resulted. With the exception of the 1991—1992 study even treatments above 0.8 kg a.i. ha" did not cause poor quality. Treatments applied at seeding in the last two studies had unacceptable quality only in the 1991-1992 study. Ethofumesate in all studies provided excellent control of P. annua. The 0.8 kg a.i. ha'l at 4 WAE followed by two additional applications at either two or four week intervals consistently resulted in excellent P. annua control. The 0.8 kg a.i. ha" at 4 and 8 WAE had more P. annua when compared to the 0.8 kg a.i. ha'l with three applications. Treatments with 0.4 and 1.4 kg a.i. ha'l applied to the first seeding dates of all studies had a higher percentage of P. annua. Turfgrass cover was not evaluated until the 1991 study. In the 1991 study all of the treatments had acceptable turf cover with the exception of treatments applied at seeding. All treatments (except those applied at seeding) 11 applied in the 1992 study had acceptable coverage for the first seeding date but only treatments with two applications in the mid-seeding date had acceptable percent cover and the last seeding showed poor percent cover in all treatments. This poor percent cover in the 1992 study was a result of cold temperatures resulting in winter kill of the bentgrass seedlings and reduced establishment but not winter kill of P. annua. An example is the control treatment on the last seeding date of 1992 had 75% cover of which 52% was P. annua and therefore only 23% bentgrass. The poor percent cover observed where treatments were applied at seeding in 1991 and in tilled and untilled treatment in 1992 is not totally expected. Ethofumesate has shown some preemergence activity (Adams 1989) therefore likely preventing the germination of creeping bentgrass especially where organic matter has been removed through tilling (Carlson and Branham 1991). There was a greater reduction in turf cover in 1992 where treatments were tilled versus untilled. There are several possible reasons why the percentage of P. annua was lower for the later seeding dates: 1) maximum activity from ethofumesate comes when the herbicide is not watered in after application; 2) ethofumesate was not acting as a preemergence herbicide (Chapter 3); 3) applications of ethofumesate could be temperature dependent; or 4) P. annua germination 12 levels off or decreases during late summer and fall (Figure 2.1 and 2.2). As the later seeding dates were irrigated to initiate germination of the bentgrass the earlier seeding dates were receiving ethofumesate applications and also being watered due to the layout of the experimental area, leading to reduced ethofumesate activity in the early seeding dates. After the early seeding dates had received all their treatments P. annua germination may have continued with little preemergence control from ethofumesate. During later seeding dates conditions were less conducive for P. annua germination. With less germination and some control from the ethofumesate treatments, less P. annua was observed with the late seedings. The preemergence activity of ethofumesate can be better observed if a comparison of tilled versus untilled plots from the 1992 study is made. There was significantly less establishment of both P. annua and bentgrass in the tilled plots when compared to the untilled plots. Most renovation projects would not till but leave the dead, existing turf stand to provide better stability and moisture for the new, establishing seedlings. The tilled plots do not have a layer of organic matter to bind the ethofumesate but the untilled plots still have an organic matter layer present, binding ethofumesate and making the application less effective. On the early seeding dates temperatures were mild, but on the later seeding dates temperatures were colder possibly causing increased P. annua control (Chapter l3 3 and 4) from an ethofumesate application. As an example, in 1991 the average low/high temperature was 14/28 for the early seeding date and 7/20 on the late seeding date. 13 3 and 4) from an ethofumesate application. As an example, in 1991 the average low/high temperature was 14/28 for the early seeding date and 7/20 on the late seeding date. 14 Table 1.1. ETHOFUMESATE TREATMENTS FOR RENOVATION STUDIES RATES (kg ai ha") AND TIMINGS 19894990 Study 1) Control 2) 0.8- 4 WAE+ + 0.8- 8 WAE 3) 0.8- 6 WAE + 0.8- 10 WAE 4) 0.8— 4 WAE + 0.8— 8 WAE + 0.8— 12 WAE 5) 0.8- 4 WAE + 0.8- 6 WAE + 0.8- 8 WAE 6) 0.6 4 WAE + 0.6 6 WAE + 0.6 8 WAE 7) 0.8- 4 WAE + 1.4 6 WAE 8) 0.4 2 WAE + 0.8— 5 WAE 1990—1991 Study 1—8) Same treatments as used in the previous study plus 9) 1.7— 2 WAE + 1.7- 5 WAE 10) 0.8- 2 WAE + 0.8- 5 WAE + 0.8— 8 WAE 11) 0.6 at Seeding + 30 DAT: 12) 0.8- at Seeding + 30 DAT 1991—1992 Study 1—12) Same treatments as used in the previous study plus 13) 0.6 at Seeding + 30 DAT (plots tilled) 14) 0.8— at Seeding + 30 DAT (plots tilled) 15) 0.6 at Seeding 16) 0.8— at Seeding 17) 1.1- at Seeding 18) 1.7— at Seeding -1. - WAE — weeks after emergence of bentgrass - DAT - days after treatment mmSwEB no 85%on 3% £83 - m<>> - H 32:5 858 tow a ho... 658382: Dov 5:35 :8 Ha 49:95 :53 H2 638 or. 9:50 - ..4 15 a. h b 2 ~._ 3 me... fl: :3 a m m m 3 mm 33 m -wd + mi» N as a o o m I no 3 m3: -3 + E55. as s _ _ o 3 2 3 ”.23 w -90 + 5;» o -90 + ms,» 4 -90 6 o _ _ I No 3 E; w -wd + ms,» 0 -wd + ms,» 4 -wd a o _ m 3 3 3 m5» a .g + m<>> w -3 + m5» 4 -wd a, N 2 m 2 3w 3 m<>> 2 a3 + m2; a .MS a o m : 3 E SW ms,» w -wc + ES; 4 -wd a 3 mm R 3 3 3 6:80 : 23 :0 mi 23 :o w; 8.5 9:38 83% $3: 65:3 .m ezmuzma g ozEF nz< in. a we may; EOZ§ ><>>~=~_D_.Z_ Hump—t ZO WkE~Pm 3-33 .NA 225. 05:08: 00:0 0090 - .55 - 0 0099000 00 8009200 00:0 0083 - m<>> - H 0:03:00 0058 :00 0 08 0.0900895 00V 5:95 0000 Ha 49:95 00003 H: ”208 0-: 5:95 - 04 0 0 0 9 9 2 .0 0.0 00 A000 ".0 000 W 010 a 0 N m 3 0w 0i0 EB 00 + 05080 a -00 AN: 8 N0 00 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 020 00 + 05080 a -00 E N0 00 00 0 _ 0. 0 0.0 E 0.35 0 -00 + m3,» 0 -00 + 023 N -00 :2 N0 00 00 0 0 00 0.0 0 0.0 035 0 -2 + 023 N -2 a 00 00_ 00_ 0 0_ 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 ms,» 0 -00 + 0.43 N 4.0 A0 00 00_ 00 N 0 0_ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.350 -3 + 023 4 -00 s N0 000 00 N 4 NN 0.0 2 0.0 035 0 -00 + 023 0 -00 + ”-23 0 -00 :0 w N0 00 00 0 _ 0 0N 0.0 0N ms,» 0 -00 + 023 0 -00 + 9;» 0 -00 $- 00 00_ 00 N 0 2 E 0.0 E 035 N_ -00 + 0.35 0 -00 + 023 0 -00 0. 00 00 00 0 _ 0_ 0.0 0N 0N ms,» 00 -00 + 0.35 0 -00 a 00 00. 00_ 0 N. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ms; 0 -00 + #23 0. -00 AN 00_ 00_ 00_ 00 00 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 .2200 2 0:0 :0 0:0 0:0 50 0:0 0:0 50 0:0 3.5 955% SE0 5% 0000: _ a 353 .4 0209:: 5-: $5050 .09: ”07:2; nz< 0.2. a 00 00:5. 050020550 ZOF<>OZ§ ><>>~=QDHw 3.8% .mA 030% 17 0 mm mm o o : m: 0.0. 0.0 m<>> w 0.0 + m<>> m .06 + m<>> N 0.0 8: m c. we 0 o N 0.. N... Nam m<>> m -2 + m<3 N -6: 8 00 mm no 0 _ D oN 0.0 0.0 m<>> m 0.0 + m<>> N .06 8 00 Q. 00 : o 0 Wm 0.0 00 0735 0 -00.: + m<>> :0 .06 :0 mm 8 oo. o : 0 Wm 0.0 0.0 m<>> w 0.0 + m<>> 0 -o.o + m<>> v 40.0 3 M: N0 00 o o _ :0 0.0 0.0 m<>> w 0.0 + m<>> 0 0.0 + m<>> v .0.0 8 mm 00 oo— o o _ Wm 0.0 0.0 m<>> N: .0.0 + m<>> w 0.0 + m<>> :0 .00 G 0.0 8 co: 0 m 0 me 0.0 :- m<>> 0: .0d + m<3 o .06 Am mm 8 oo: o : 0 Om 0.0 0.0 m<>> w 0.0 + 335 v 0.0 AN Q. 8. oo: Nm mm mm :0 o0 :- 60000 : 23 080 0:0 23 afiw 0:0 25 080 0:0 80D aficoom. NQNNR NQNNR 210:: 550-9 hzmummn— 3:53 .m thUy—mm .- 0; 5.505 “ED-r 02:2:- QZ< :0: E 3: mug-<1 whOZ§ ><>>~=OU Q72 .w—Ow—PZOU S055 3% .>P—A§Pm $-33 .VA 030,—. 18 00.5000 .000 0.000 - ..-2 - .40 00030.00 00:50 :00 .0 .00 059000000: 0.0V 5:9... .000 No 00.300 .0003 H. ”0.000 0-. 00:95 - 04 0— 0. 0. 0 0 0 0.. 9.. .m— 600 "A: D04 N. m 00 0 0 m. 0.. 0.. 0.0 00.0000 .0 -0. .0. 0 v 00. 0 0 00 0.. 0.. 0.0 00.0000 .0 -... .0. 0. m 00. . 0 50 0.. 0.. 0.0 00.0000 .0 -00 6. N 0. 00 0 0 N 0.. 0.. 0.0 00.0000 .0 -00 .0. 0 N v. 0 0 0 0.. 0.. m. .00.... 0.0.0. 55 00 + 00.0000 .0 -00 .0. N . N0 0 0 . 0.. 0.. 0.0 .00.... 0.0.0. .35 Om + 00.0000 .0 0.0 .m. 0. . N0 0 0 m 0.. 0.. 0.0 005 00 + 00.0000 .0 0.0 .N. 0. N 00. 0 0 0. 0.. 0.. 0.0 0.35 00 + 00.0000 .0 0.0 :. N.\o 0N0 0:0 N.\0 0N0 0:0 N.\0 0N0 0:0 0.00. 050000 NQNNR NQNNR .922. 4304' g 333.1 02.2:- oz< 0.00 .0 9.. 000$. E<0mzamozhm A9250. .0; 030.0 19 Table 1.5. PERCENT Poa annua AVERAGED ACROSS-ALL ETHOFUMESATE TREATMENTS WITHIN EACH SEEDING DATE YEAR OF STU DY SEEDING DATE 1989-90 1990—91 1991-92 Early 9.1 14.2 10.7 Mid 3.4 3.9 0.7 Late 0.4 2.2 0.1 LSD (P = 0.05) 0.3 4.4 2.7 20 LITERATURE CITED Adams, J.C. 1989. Control of Poa annua in cool—season turf with ethofumesate. Proceedings Canadian T urfgrass Conference and Show. 1920. Ball, A.P., and AR. Roberts. 1974. The use of ethofumesate for weed control in ryegrass seed crops. Proceedings of the 12th British Weed Control Conference. 727—732. Beard, J .B. 1973. Turfgrass: Science and Culture. 67—70. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs. NJ. Carlson, TC, and BE. Branham. 1991. Pre and post emergence control of annual bluegrass. 6lst Annual Michigan Turfgrass Conference Proceedings. 20: 108—113. Demoeden, P.H., and TR. Turner. 1988. Annual bluegrass control and tolerance of Kentucky bluegrass and perennial ryegrass to ethofumesate. HortScience. 23: 565-567. Demoeden, P.H., and TR. Turner. 1986. Selective control of Poa annua in perennial ryegrass and creeping bentgrass with ethofumesate. Proceedings Northeast Weed Science Society. 40: 276—277. Dickens, R. 1981. Rates and timing of ethofumesate applications for annual bluegrass control. Agronomy Abstracts. 124-125. Gibeault, VA. 1974. Poa annua. California Turfgrass Culture. 24: 13-16. Johnson, B.J., G.W. Landry Jr., and K. Kamok. 1989. Tolerance of bentgrass to amount, frequency, and timing of ethofumesate applications. HortScience. 24: 102—104. Kageyama, M.E., and LR. Widell. 1989. Annual bluegrass to bentgrass conversion with turf growth retardants (TGRs). 307—311. In A.R. Leslie and R.L. Metcalf (ed.). Integrated Pest Management for T urfgrass and Ornamentals. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. 21 Shearman, RC. 1986. Kentucky bluegrass and annual bluegrass response to ethofumesate. HortScience. 21: 1157-1159. Chapter 2 PREEMERGENCE CONTROL OF Poa annua ABSTRACT One chemical method for P. annua control would be the use of a preemergence herbicide. A two year study was initiated to evaluate the potential of preemergence herbicides for control of P. annua. P. annua control was determined by counting the number of seedlings within observation circles. The observation circles provided a means to evaluate the effectiveness of the preemergence herbicides for P. annua control. P. annua seedlings were counted every two to three weeks in the observation circles as a way to determine the control achieved. Most preemergence herbicides provided consistent control over both years. Products provided good control in the fall with ethofumesate being the only exception. Products giving good control in the fall had good control the following spring. All spring applications provided fair control for almost 8-10 weeks. Oxadiazon [2-tert—butyl-4—(2,4 dichloro—5—isopropoxyphenyl)-A2 1,3,4—oxadiazolin—5—one], dithiopyr [3,5- pyridinedicarbothioic acid, 2-(difluoromethyl)—4—(2—methylpropyl)-6- (trifluoromethyl)-S, S—dimethyl ester], and prodiamine [N3, N3-Di—n-propyl—2, 4-dinitro—6-(trifluoromethyl)—m-phenylenediamine] provided the highest level of 22 23 control throughout the study with values ranging from 100 to 75% control. Preemergence herbicides appear to be successful in preventing P. annua from germination. This could be beneficial in preventing P. annua from entering a newly established or renovated fairway. 24 INTRODUCTION Controlling P. annua is a difficult task. If acceptable control cannot be achieved with postemergence strategies, complete renovation of P. annua infested tees, fairways, and greens is an option (Chapter 1). However even with complete renovation, the problem is not solved. During the years an area has been infested with P. annua, prolific production of viable P. annua seed occurs (Lush 1988b; Grime 1981). With postemergence control of P. annua possible and even in the case of complete renovation, there is still a large seed bank remaining in the soil (Grime 1981). Each P. annua inflorescence can produce between 2 to 3 viable seeds (Lush 1988a). On a golf course green this could lead to production of 150,000 - 675,000 seeds m‘2 y'1 (Lush 19883) with 30,000 seeds rn‘2 persisting till next season or for later years (Lush 1988b). Of the total seeds produced there is a potential of 100,000 — 265,000 seeds germinating (Lush 19883) with little or no dormancy needed for the seed (Warwick and Briggs 1978). Koshy(1969) has stated the versatility of seed formation for P. annua contributes to its conspicuous success as a weed. In addition to a postemergence control program or following renovation, a preemergence 25 strategy should play an important role in preventing P. annua from reestablishing. The variability that exists within P. annua (Koshy 1969; Wu, Till- Bottraud and Torres 1987; McNeilly 1984; Naylor and Abdalla 1982) could pose a challenge in the use of a preemergence control plan for P. annua. Germination of P. annua will vary from one golf course to the next (Wu, Till- Bottraud and Torres 1987) and even from one part of a course to another (Lush 1989). In addition to the variability due to location, germination will vary depending on the requirements needed to initiate germination. P. annua germination is most successful at temperatures between 10 and 15°C (Beard 1980; Standifer 1988; Eggens and Ormrod 1982; Naylor and Abdalla 1982), but will germinate over a large temperature range. Most germination will occur between 2 to 40°C and decline above and below this range (Koch 1968). Success in germination is also dependent upon sufficient light (Naylor and Abdalla 1982) and promoted by adequate nitrate (Williams 1983). With the success of P. annua and the variability within the species, the use of a preemergence herbicide to control P. annua germination could be challenging. Development of a control strategy using a preemergence herbicide could be beneficial in preventing P. annua from establishing. The objective of this research was to attempt to determine which herbicides provide 26 good preemergence P. annua control at fairway height. Some research has been done on preemergence control of P. annua (Juska and Hanson 1962; Engel 1976) but is limited and has not looked at preemergence control on fairway height cut and the potential to develop a P. annua management strategy. Other objectives were to determine the longevity of the preemergence applications and the need for multiple applications. Evaluation of preemergence control of P. annua becomes difficult in a densely populated turf stand. Counting the number of seedlings within observation circles was a way to overcome this problem. 27 MATERIAL AND METHODS Two field studies were conducted during the fall of 1990 through the spring of 1991 and one study in the fall of 1991 through the spring of 1992 to evaluate ethofumesate and other preemergence herbicides for preemergence P. annua control. The research site consisted of a predominately P. annua turf at the Hancock Turfgrass Research Center, East Lansing, Michigan. The area was fertilized with 46-0—0 totaling 146 kg N ha" in 1990, 98 kg N ha'I in 1991 and 76 kg N ha"1 in 1992. Pesticides applied were fenarimol [01-(2- chlorophenyl)—or—(4—chlorophenyl)—5—pyrimidinemethanol] at 5 kg ha“ and a combination product of 2,4-D [dimethylamine salt of 2,4— dichlorophenoxyacetic acid]; mecoprop [dimethylamine salt of 2-(2—methyl—4- chlorophenoxy) propionic acid]; and dicamba [dimethylamine salt of dicamba (3,6-dichloro—o—anisic acid)] at 21 L ha'1 in 1990, two applications of triadimefon [1—(4-chlorophenoxy)-3, 3—dimethyl-1—(1H—1, 2, 4-triazol—1—yl)—2— butanone] at 6 kg ha‘1 and an application of chlorothalonil [tetrachloroisophthalonitrile] at 18 kg ha'l in 1991, and sethoxydim [2-[1— (ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-one] at 25 kg ha‘l were made in 1992. The plots were mowed three times weekly 28 during the growing season and as needed during late fall and early spring, at a height of 1.3 cm. The area was irrigated as needed. The 1990 and 1991 general preemergence studies used a randomized complete block design with three replications. Individual plots measured 1.2 m x 3.0 m. The ethofumesate [2—ethoxy—2, 3—dihydro-3, 3—dimethyl—5- benzofuranyl methanesulfonate] study in 1990 used a factorial design to evaluate ethofumesate control in the fall and spring. Factor one was a fall application and factor two was a spring application. Each factor had five rates of ethofumesate 0.0, 0.6, 1.1, 1.7, and 2.2 kg a.i. ha“. Plot size was 1.2 m x 1.8 m. The plots in the 1990 and 1991 studies were split in half with one half receiving both fall and spring applications. This allowed evaluation of preemergence control of the spring and fall application. For both studies liquid treatments were applied with a four nozzle boom—C02 backpack sprayer delivering 514 L ha'l at 0.28 MPa for the fall applications and 538 L ha'l at 0.28 MPa for the spring applications. Granular treatments were weighed and applied with a shaker bottle. All treatments were applied on 9/6/90 for the ethofumesate study. The general preemergence studies were initiated on 9/ 11/90 and 9/11/91. Spring applications were applied on 4/12/91 and 3/31/92. All treatments were watered in with approximately 0.6 cm of water. 29 Observation circles measuring 11.4 cm2 were sprayed with glyphosate [N—(phosphonomethyl) glycine] in each plot area. The observation circles provided a means to maintain a microclirnate (temperature, moisture, organic matter, cover, etc.) similar to an established fairway turf. Counting the seedlings within the circles provided an estimate of P. annua control. Seedlings were counted every two to three weeks in three of the six observation circles in 1990-91 and four of eight circles in 1991-92. The circles were then sprayed again with glyphosate. On the next evaluation the remaining circles were used for evaluation and then sprayed with glyphosate. This procedure of alternating between half of the observation circles continued throughout the study. The average seedlings per treatment were determined and data are reported as percent control. Experimental design was a randomized complete block with three replications; all data were subjected to an analysis of variance. 30 RESULTS 1990—1991 Field Studies Ethofumesate treatments applied in the fall gave little to no control of P. annua (Table 2.1), and the study was discontinued after the fall data was collected. The general preemergence study gave excellent control of P. annua (Table 2.2). The two evaluations taken in October showed more than 90% control with a preemergence herbicide. The last evaluation taken on 11/5 (data not shown) indicated that germination of P. annua had ceased. Control from the fall application was still evident in the evaluation taken at the time of the spring application. Both rates of pendimethalin [N—(l- ethylpropyl)—3,4-dimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzamine], dithiopyr (EC), benefm [N— butyl-N—ethyl-(x,01,01-trifluoro-2,6—dinitro—p—toluidine], and DCPA [dimethyl tetrachloroterephthalate]; and the low rate of dithiopyr (G) had less than 75% control. All other treatments provided greater than 75% control of P. annua. By the 6/17 evaluation all fall applied treatments provided 0% control. Spring treatments were applied on 4/12/91 when germination of P. annua had already occurred. Treatments gave excellent control (Table 2.3) on the 5/30 evaluation with the low rates of dithiopyr (G) and benefm, and 31 bensulide [S—(0,0-diisopropy1 phosphorodithioate) ester of N-(2-mercaptoethyl) benzenesulfonaminde] having less than 75% control (Table 2.3). On the 6/ 17 evaluation, almost ten weeks after application only bensulide, the low rates of oxadiazon and prodiamine; and the high rate of dithiopyr (G) had better than 75% control. The 7/1 evaluation showed all treatments provided less than 75% control. The spring treatments were applied on 4/12 and controlled P. annua germination for approximately 12 weeks. The first evaluation after the spring application taken on 5/10 showed no germination in any of the treatments including the control plots. Research has shown that when soil is dry and temperatures are high, emergence of P. annua may be delayed and when temperatures are low, emergence is delayed or reduced (Wells 1974). This may explain the rating on 5/ 10 with no germination, since prior to the evaluation the environmental conditions were cool and dry and not conducive to P. annua germination. 1991-1992 Field Studies Fall treatments provided greater than 75% control of P. annua germination on the 10/22 evaluation date with the exception of both rates of ethofumesate and the low rate of benefm(Table 2.4). All treatments on the 32 11/8 evaluation had better than 75% control except the low rate of ethofumesate. The first spring evaluation on 4/23 showed that the low rates of oxadiazon and pendimethalin; both rates of benefin, bensulide and ethofumesate; the high rate of dithiopyr (EC); and benefm + trifluralin [N- butyl-N-ethyl-(x,0t,(x—triflu0ro—2,6-dinitro—p—toluidine + a,(x,01—trifluoro-2,6- dinitro-N,N-dipropyl~p—toluidine] had less than 75% control. The 5/ 13 evaluation showed that benefin + trifluralin; the low rates of oxadiazon [2— tert-butyl-4—(2,4 dichloro—5—isopropoxyphenyl)—A2 1,3,4—oxadiazolin-5—one], dithiopyr(EC), prodiamine, bensulide; the high rate of DCPA [Dimethyl tetrachloroterephthalate]; and both rates of benefin and ethofumesate gave less than 75% control. On 6/1 the low rate of prodiamine; the high rates of dithiopyr (G) and bensulide; and both rates of pendimethalin and DCPA gave better than 75% control. The final evaluation taken on 6/22 showed no treatments giving better than 75% control. Spring applications were applied on 3/31/92 and unlike the previous year P. annua had not yet germinated. Spring applied treatments gave excellent control until 6/22 with most treatments giving greater than 75% control of P. annua compared to the check plot (Table 2.5). On the 6/22 evaluation treatments began to show reduced control. The only treatments 33 giving better than 75% control were the high rates of oxadiazon, pendimethalin, and prodiamine. 34 DISCUSSION As cited in the literature, P. annua produces prolific amounts of seed and the viability of that seed is high; the need to prevent germination is very important. These results show the potential preemergence herbicides could play in the overall control strategy of P. annua. Preemergence herbicides can prevent P. annua seed from reestablishing. Preemergence herbicides gave significant control except ethofumesate. Ethofumesate has been shown to have both post and preemergence properties for P. annua control (Adams 1989). In a preemergence study done at Michigan State University in 1987 (Carlson and Branham 1991), ethofumesate gave excellent preemergence control of P. annua. The 1987 study was conducted on bare soil with all rates of ethofumesate providing good control of P. annua. Why was ethofumesate effective in the bare soil study but gave little to no control in these preemergence studies? In the bare soil study, there was little organic matter on the soil surface. Thus, the organic matter inherently present with turf, approximately 0.6—1.3 cm of thatch in these studies, may bind ethofumesate making it ineffective as a preemergence control. Most herbicides provided consistent control over both years. Preemergence herbicides provided good control in the fall with ethofumesate 35 being the only exception. In the evaluations, oxadiazon, pendimethalin, dithiopyr (G), prodiamine, and DCPA provided good control. Benefin, dithiopyr (EC), and bensulide had fair control with ethofumesate and benefin + trifluralin having poor control. In 1992 control was observed approximately one month longer than 1991 and was probably the result of the unseasonably cool fall in 1991 giving little reduction of the herbicide activity. Spring herbicide applications provided control for about 8-10 weeks before they began to have reduction in preemergence control. Benefm, dithiopyr (EC) bensulide, DCPA, and ethofumesate provide the weakest control. These conclusions drawn from both years may not be totally representative of what is occurring. The observation circles were small in size and few in number making variability high. In addition the circles were lacking plant cover so were not totally representative of a turf stand. This may account for some of the variability with a product over both years. The next logical step in controlling P. annua is to determine the optimum timing to apply the preemergence herbicide for the most effective results. Germination of P. annua occurs much earlier in the spring than expected. The average number of seedlings in the control plots was plotted against time for both 1991 and 1992. The results show that P. annua 36 germinates early and all season long (Figure 2.1 and 2.2). There are several times at which no germination occurred and this is probably related to conditions not conducive to germination. Previous investigators (Beard et al.1978) thought that P. annua germinated in the spring and fall and stopped during the summer. These results suggest that two or more preemergence applications may be needed to achieve season long control. A fall application is beneficial for fall germination and gives some control the following spring. With the early germination of P. annua it is important to get a spring application out as early in the spring as possible. With these studies giving approximately eight good weeks of control before germination started, an additional one or two applications would be needed to prevent germination and give season long control. 37 Table 2.1. 1990 FALL ETHOFUlVIESATE APPLICATION FOR CONTROL OF Poa annua ETHOFUMESATE‘F PERCENT CONTROL: kg a.i. ha'I 9/29/90 10/22/90 11/5/90 2.2 l3 l7 3 1.7 7 13 0 1.] l 1 9 14 0.6 9 30 5 0.0 9 9 9 LSD (P: 0.05) NS 16 NS t — Treated 9/1 1/90 0053 00.0000- - + 38 00 NN 0. .000“... 00-. 00 00. 00. 0.0. 03 0N $.00 .0. .0 00. 00. 0.: 03 00 $.00 0.. MN 00. 00. 0.: 00 0. 00.3050 .0. 00 00. 00. 0.0 003 00 2.0.0.020 .N. N0 00. 00. 0.0 003 00 00.50020 0. 00 00. 00. 0.0 o 0.N 00050 .0. 0.0 00 00 N.N o N 000000 .0 N0 00. 00. 0.0 00 . 0000005 .0 00 00 00. .0 00 . 0.00005 .N 00 S 00 0.0 0 0N0 00.0.0.5 .0 N0 00 00 0.0 00N0 0006.000 .0 00 00. 00. 0.0 003 00 000005.050 0. .N .0 00. N.N 003 00 009.000.0000 .0 00 00. 00_ 0... o N 080005 .N 00 00. .0 N.N o N 080.090 0 53:0 003KB. 0035— 4000200 PZmUMmE 1.00.00 V. m-.-<~. ZOE-0015.200”. 3:50 00% .mO AOm-HZOU m0...— ZOE.> we go 003 me «an 0 WM N.N 0 Wm 06 Um _ Yo Um _ 0.0 D wmd Yo O mmd md O mmd «6 OD? ow N.N 003 8 me O m N.N 0 m 20,0; 0.0 v— mké 20:24:50“. 3: to 02$; - + EREECL + 5.35% BSoEEOEm BfioEEOEm $50. $50 033:8 02.305 05:02.09; 2:50:09; ccocom caucum 0.3255 0.8255 30255 582.20 0.8255 £25565; 53508650 08.06200 .5500wa .oN .9 .M: E .2 .2 .3 .9 .N. .: .2 a .w .n 6 .m .v .m .N 0 3:50 00% m0 AOMFZOD Kora ZOEZUEAE< HUZm—Gmnflzmmmm 4‘33 33 .V.N wish. 41 N0..0.0 00.8; - 0 00 3. 8 00 0N 0. .0003: 000 0. ml. 0N 0'0 .001. 0.. 0.. 0 N 5.050.; + 002.00 .0N .0 00 0N 00 00. .0 0.. 0m. 0.. 0.88.0000 .0. ..N 00 .0 00 00 00. 0.0 00 0.. 232500.00 .0. 00 0. N0 00 00. 00 0.0. 03 00 $.00 .0. 0. 0N 0N 00. 00. 00 0... 03 00 $.00 .0. 0N 0. 0. 00. 0.. 00 N... 00 0 00.0080 .0. 0N 0. 00 0.. 00. 00. 0..; 00 0 00.0050 .0. 00 00 00 00. 00. 00. 0.0 003 00 8.0.0.00... .0. 00 0.. .0 00. 00. 00 0.0 003 00 2.0.0.090 .N. .0 .0 0 00. 00. .0 0.0 0 0.N 002.00 0. N0 0. 0N 00 00 N0 N.N 0 0.N 002.00 .0. 0. 0N 0 00. 00. 00. 0.0 00 . L0.00.00 .0 N NN .N 00 00. 00. 0.0 00 . 0.00.0.0 .0 00 00 0.. 00. 00. 00. 0.0 00N.0 .3250 .0 N0 N0 00 00. 00. 00. 0.0 00N.0 0.00.0.0 .0 0 0. 0 00. N0 00. 0.0 00N.0 00000.0 .0 00 00 R 00. 00. 00. 0.0 003 00 5.2.2.050 .0 0 .0 0 00. 00. 00. N.N 003 00 5.260.080 .0 00 N0 .0 00. 00. 00. 0.0 0 N 080.005 .N N0 N. 00 00 00. 00. N.N 0 N 080.030 .. N00... N005 N0.NN.0 N020 N050 N03; JOMFZOU ,erUmmN— 2.0; .00 mg. mpg 20:24:33.0“. 355» 00K mO AOKHZOD mOm ZOEEU—AAEAN MUZmUmH—memm Ozamm N03 .m.~ 030,—. 42 0030.00.00. :00 0. 80008. E 00:0EESw 0:000 000 $3.08. ...N 000E”. 05:02 .0-—3. 3-5:. H0090. 09.00 oodom :: :EEC: 2:2: .::E::: :55... EELS: :ErFCZS. EEC::E:LE:CEEZE.: :m::CLr:E.::Eb.:K. ,.:r::.:: .EL::.:.:_:::.:FFEY O N W, 0 S 0 w P , m . w .3 s _ w A: .0 N. ‘ 3 ZOHPANZ—Ewum—U 02 2 s35 @333 we a 8 N N8 N N.N 3 >02 2 8:5 2 asaam Nd a 8 m. 8 o N.N 3 >02 @350 2 £an 2 K 8_. N 8 m. 3 3 so E 8.5% we 6 8_ NN 8 t 3 S 5< @350 25.5% M3 8 8 N 8 m 2 we .3 38.82 @325 woaaom we a. 82 2 9: w mm 3 >02 £350 385% we a 8_ a. 8 N 3 3 so woaaum ME AN 9: No 02 8 3w 0.8 .228 2 550 am. 8; «R B>oU 05 mom em. #0.: 2.:— chzgfi 92 ENE 85% 3:3 8%: $2.? 9.555. mimmziozem .N.—DECO 355» 3k D72 Kauai mOm mZO—PaNU—w—NEAN E5hOEm mam—HAD: 3-33 Ad flash. 33:8 858 row c8 038382: Dov SS? 0: Ho .32. 3223.8 HE ”28m «1 Egg - m 5: :v 28 9:9: do: :2 6923 828; -M 8.5 :00 :8qu a @883 beam - + 59 3 NA N.N. we 3.. 2. A8... u.c am; a _| a .l m 013 :2 23.82 S sfoo 333m 2 :N mm N 8 o E 3 5< 3552 E MN60 2 818m 2 SN 8 3 cm _ N.N 3 >02 2 ago woaaom Z 5 8 m g N N.N 3 5< @3300 E swaom Z a“ 8 _ Nw o N.N 3 5< M2382 M23300 2 828m 2 E 8 N 5 N 3 3 >02 5 8:00 2 838m 2 a: 8 m 8 3 3 3 >02 M23590 5 818m 2 E 8 2 8 m 9m 3 so 5 858w E a; 330 x «cm my 850 am. «on “N. lbflfil 57:2: nz< 58m 85?. 55». SE: :2 .2 9: mar—.5. E57: - 33:: 2a 552: .Séma c028; - ... . 4. . .1 m. _ _ a a R w. 8 mm a 8 8 8 Nate 85:. 8.58 .258: m2 >6 Nd Gad “A: Gm; Wm 3 Wm 6:50 0.0 N.N Cd 5; + b; + N; w.w 50 m8 wd + wd + wd 0.0 0.0 0.0 w; + N..— od w.» m8 wd + wd NQm—E Nahum? 33;:— fimlv OZEt~5§Z_ tea; ._.m we: mmrrg mk<>>~=v—UDFZMM ZO Kali E mmgwr—me ZO >Hmym022 50.2 Emm a 8 mm 8 Q 3 3 E . >02 .2 +00 ,2 ram 8 33 Q m 8 3 3. 3 2 >02 .. >00 .2 ram 8 8 S NN R 3. 3 3 . >02 .. >00 2 km; 8 R 2 a 33. S 3 3 2 50 .. >00 .2 Ema 8. 8 mm 3 3. 3 3 3 2 >02 .. >02 8. 8 N. cm 8 3 3 3 2 >022 >00 8. mm 2 Q m 3 3 3 . >022 +00 8. 8 mm 8 m 3 3 3 2 >02 .. >00 8. a a 3 mm. 3 3 3 . >02 .. >00 8 2w 5. S R 3 3 3 2 50 ._ >00 8. 8 5. mm 8 3 3 3 2 >02 .2 5% 8. 3 mm mm 8 3 3 3 _ >02 .2 Ema 8. a 9. mm. 8 3 3 3 2 50 .2 E3 8. 3 8 mm. NW 3 3 3 . +00 .2 km; 8. 00. mm 3 mm. 3 3 3 22 >02 8. 8 mm a a. 3 3 3 .5. >02 8. 8 m 2 mm. 3 3 3 .2 +00 8. 8 8 2 8 3 3 3 2 >00 8. 8. mm N3 8 o... E 3 ”.2 Em... 8. 8. S 33 B 3 3 3 00E200 a «2...... g $.th § 8.3% 82:... mam m2: ZO_FOU Fzmoxmn— 35:: ,1 thUmma $20533“:ng E~5_.Z_ 00:00:00.“ 00.0.. 020.03 >3. 8:: 05.20050. .5. EzEEE. U .._. 00:00:00: 00 >5. 0.5.0.0050. :0 EzEEE. U 00 ...0_...0.._00.. 0.000.. 03.05. >3. 00...: 0.22.00.20. :0 805.5... U N.N: 3 00:30:00.” 00.0.. 03.02. >3. 8:: 20.8.00E0. 0... E0025... U 0.0. 0005.300 00 >5. 0.3...00E0. .E E::..EE U 9m ...0..00:00a 0.000... 03.03 >3. 00.5 0.525050. 0... 525.50. U v.0. .5. 00:00:00.. 00.00 0mu00>m >3. 09:: 25.20050. E. EEEEE U 0.0- 00:00:03 00 >80 0.8.50.5. .0. 555.55 U m.m. 00:00:00.3 0.0000 02.202. >3. 00...: 0.0.5.0005. .5. 0.250.... U 0.0: .0 20:00:03 00.0.. 0w§0>m >5. 00...: 05.0.0050. .5. 5355:. U w... 00:00:00.. 00 >5. 005.00.00.20. :0 E=:.E.E U m6.— .E._.r.0:00.. 0.5000 03.05 >5. 00E. 0.2....0050. :0 825:. U 9m. r 00:30:00.. .0....“ 03.03 >5. 8...: 0.0.0.0008. .2. E:....EE U .0 20:50:00.. 00 >3. 05.2.0005. .5. 5:02.22. U 3.. . 00082000 0.502. 03.0; >3. 00.... 0.350080. E. 05:22.... U mi. a >555 03.5... :cm .0 000 03500000.... meV >03... 0: no .0000 >_0.0_0E00 H. .2003 o.— >.:.E_ . H 2....U >.:.:.0U 2:: .0555 .0 00.203 >0Em . + 64 a 3 mm mm wZ E. e; a... 8:. NE amu— : mu mm on mZ _.N a; A: 6...: um. amu— 00. av m 2 mm. Nm w. 5m 2 >02 ._ >02 .2 EUO ._ FOO .2 00mm 5 Q om ow 3 5m mam WV 5 >02 ._ >02 .5 PUG ._ PUG No K NN wv N0 wé o.~ 5m m. >02 ._ >02 .2 HUG .2 00mm 3 me hm hm wv m0 m.~ 5m 2 >02 ._ >02 ._ FUO .m_ (Emm 0w mm mm NM mm W.“ 0.». Wm 2 >02 .2 HUG ._ FUO .2 00mm mm mm mm 3 mo ma N.N 5m _ >02 .2 PUG ,_ FUD .2 00mm oo_ 3 NV ov me >0 Wm ob 2 >02 .. >02 .2 FUO 02 mm we mu mo m. 0 WV m0 2 >OZ ._ >OZ ._ HUG 3 mm mm NM we Wm w. m6 2 >02 .2 FUD ._ FUO mm mm m mm mm m0 Wm wé . >02 .3 FUO ._ FUD o2 mm. mm mm mm m.w >.v N.N 2 >02 ._ >02 .5 Sum «QR—R «QB—E NQa—fi NQEm 32;}: 3:35. ~33? 33R— mEE. ZOFOU ,er—Ummm 3.5.0 .& ,erUmmE >~5_.Z_ .20....00. 48m 030E 65 LITERATURE CITED Ball, A.P., and AR. Roberts. 1974. The use of ethofumesate for weed control in ryegrass seed crops. Proceedings of the 12th British Weed Control Conference. 727-732. Coats, GE, and J .V. Krans. 1986. Evaluation of ethofumesate for annual bluegrass (Poa annua) and turfgrass tolerance. Weed Science. 34: 930-935. Demoeden, P.H., and TR. Turner. 1988. Annual bluegrass control and tolerance of kentucky bluegrass and perennial ryegrass to ethofumesate. HortScience. 23: 565—567. Demoeden, P.H., and TR. Turner. 1986. Selective control of poa annua in perennial ryegrass and creeping bentgrass with ethofumesate. Proceedings Northeast Weed Science Society. 40: 276-277. Dickens, R. 1981. Rates and timing of ethofumesate applications for annual bluegrass control. Agronomy Abstracts. 124-125. Johnson, B.J., G.W. Landry Jr., and K. Kamok. 1989. Tolerance of bentgrass to amount, frequency, and timing of ethofumesate applications. HortScience. 24: 102—104. Kageyama, M..,E and LR. Widell. 1989. Annual bluegrass to bentgrass conversion with turf growth retardants (TGRs). 307—311. In A.R. Leslie and R.L. Metcalf (ed.). Integrated Pest Management for T utfgrass and Ornamentals. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. Shearman, RC. 1986. Kentucky bluegrass and annual bluegrass response to ethofumesate. HortScience. 21: 1157-1159. Chapter 4 GREENHOUSE STUDIES ON THE EFFECT OF COLD TEMPERATURE ON ETHOFUMESATE EFFICACY. ABSTRACT Ethofumesate [2-ethoxy—2, 3—dihydro—3, 3-dimethyl—5—benzofuranyl methanesulfonate] provides little reduction of P. annua populations when applied in the summer but fall applications give a greater reduction. Temperature appears to have an effect on ethofumesate efficacy. Greenhouse studies indicated freezing temperatures prior to an ethofumesate application is more effective in P. annua reduction than when not subjected to freezing temperatures. Two different studies were used to evaluate this hypothesis. Studies involved the use of visual and regrowth measurements to evaluate the relationship of freezing temperatures and ethofumesate applications. Plants exposed to freezing temperatures prior to an application of ethofumesate consistently were injured more and had less growth than those plants not exposed to freezing temperatures. Field application of ethofumesate could be more effective is applied after freezing temperatures. 66 67 INTRODUCTION Selective control of P. annua has become a possibility only in the last eight years. Ethofumesate is a unique herbicide which provides selective P. annua control (Ball and Roberts 1974, Demoeden and Turner 1988, Dickens 1981, Shearman 1986). One unique characteristic of ethofumesate is the application timing. According to the label the first application of ethofumesate is not to be applied until after the first of September. Another characteristic of ethofumesate is the need for multiple applications to achieve acceptable control of P. annua (Coats and Krans 1986, Shearman 1986). Some inconsistent results have been seen with this application schedule. Some years turf managers may see acceptable results and in other years they may see little if any control of P. annua. The hypothesis developed was that the temperature around the time of application influences the efficacy of ethofumesate on P. annua. Growth chamber studies were designed with the objective of determining the relationship between temperature and ethofumesate. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of freezing temperatures prior to an application of ethofumesate on P. annua growth and dry matter production. 68 MATERIAL AND METHODS P. annua was taken from the Hancock Turfgrass Research Center, East Lansing, Michigan and transplanted into 355 ml Styrofoam cups containing Baccto (Michigan Peat Company) potting media. Plant material was approximately 7.6 cm thick (soil and thatch) when placed into the cups. The cups were placed in the greenhouse and watered as needed to prevent desiccation of plant material. Supplemental lighting from fluorescent lights provided a 16 hour day length. Greenhouse temperatures were maintained at 20/18°C day/night cycle and relative humidity at 40—75%. Plants were fertilized with Peters Professional Water Soluble Fertilizer Source 20—0-20 at 237 ppm N 9.3 m ’2 every two weeks. Plant material remained in the greenhouse for approximately two weeks to allow for recovery from transplanting. Plant material was then placed in a growth chamber at 21/ 10°C with a 9/15 hours day/night cycle to begin acclimation. This continued for five days with an additional five days at 4/4°C under the same day/night cycle before plants were subjected to freezing temperatures. Plant material was subjected to freezing temperatures in a freezer prior to ethofumesate application. Temperatures were —6°C during the night cycle 69 and 3°C during the day. Duration of the freeze cycles before chemical application were 0, 1, 2, 4, and 8 days for the first two experiments; 0, 5, and 10 days for the third experiment; 0 and 5 days for the fourth. After ethofumesate was applied, plants were again placed in a growth chamber at 21/10°C with a 9/15 hours day/night cycle. Prior to plant material being placed in the 4/4°C acclimation temperatures, plants were mowed weekly at a height of 2.5 cm. Plants were again mowed weekly after the application of ethofumesate at 0.6 cm. In studies one and two, visual evaluations were used to make observations of differences among treatments. The results from the two studies were inconclusive and a more quantitative measurement was needed which would possibly show significant differences. In the third and fourth studies regrowth was mowed off above the lip of the cup at 0.6 cm using scissors. Clippings were collected with a vacuum cleaner, placed in a tared beaker and fresh weights determined. Then data was converted and reported as percent control. This continued for a total of four collection dates. A randomized complete block design with four replications was used for experiments one and two. For experiments one and two, plant material was subjected to a freezing duration of 0, 1, 2, 4, and 8 days before treatment with 0.8 kg a.i. ha" of ethofumesate. Studies three and four used a factorial design 70 with four replications. Freezing duration of 0, 5, and 10 days in study three or 0 and 5 days in study four were one factor and ethofumesate rates of 0.0, 0.2, 0.6 and 0.8 kg a.i. ha'l were a second factor. Freezing duration was prior to the application of ethofumesate. Ethofumesate treatments were applied using a track sprayer delivering 187 L ha‘1 at .22 MPa. 71 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Comparing summer versus fall applications (Table 4.1) shows that little injury resulted from summer applications but the same applications in the fall displayed a marked increase in injury. This led to the idea that temperatures at the time ethofumesate is applied are related to P. annua reduction. The control plants in study one showed little injury with only the plants in freezing temperatures 8 days significantly injured (Table 4.2). The treated plants even without freezing temperatures prior to treatment showed some injury. This injury was not as severe as those plants having a freezing duration prior to an ethofumesate treatment. The treated plants not exposed to freezing temperatures began to show some recovery, but the treated plants exposed to freezing temperatures did not. This same trend was evident in study two (Table 4.3), but there were no significant differences among freezing intervals. A more quantitative measurement was used to evaluate significant differences. Clippings collected from plant material were used to evaluate percent control when ethofumesate was applied after freezing temperatures. This technique was modified into a rate study with plant material subjected to freezing temperatures for 0, 5 or 10 days before treatment. 72 One week after treatment (Table 4.4) the three rates of ethofumesate applied to the plants in freezing temperatures 10 days were giving almost 75 percent reduction or better along with the high rate on the plants in freezing temperatures 5 days. The plants in freezing temperatures 5 days at the low rate and all rates on all plants receiving no freezing temperatures had less than 50 percent reduction. The only exception being the high rate on the plants in freezing temperatures 0 days. The second and third mowing had near 100 percent reduction from the two highest rates of the plants in freezing temperatures 5 and 10 days. The fourth mowing had 100 percent reduction with the two high rates on plants in freezing temperatures 5 and 10 days and the high rate on the plants receiving no freezing temperatures. This may be better observed graphically (Figure 4.1 and 4.2) showing percent reduction at various rates for different freezing durations. These results were consistent with a fourth study (Table 4.5). Because of limitations of plant material only 0 and 5 day freezing duration was possible. Percent reduction for treated plants in freezing temperatures were consistently higher than treated plants never exposed to freezing temperatures (Figure 4.3 and 4.4). This study did show good significant results on the final mowing. Plants receiving a freezing duration prior to an application of ethofumesate 73 resulted in greater P. annua reduction than if no freezing duration was encountered. This same trend has been observed in the field (Chapter 3). Before data was converted to percent reduction the fresh weights revealed that the frozen controls consistently had less clippings than the unfrozen controls. This was not totally unexpected due to the susceptibility of P. annua to cold temperatures (Beard 1973). Some of the injury and reduction are possibly a result of cold temperatures. This may explain why freezing temperatures prior to an application of ethofumesate has an effect on the P. annua. Some of the plants may have been killed or injured because of the cold temperatures. Making the application of ethofumesate on less P. annua and/or injured plants makes the end result appear as greater reduction. In comparison ethofumesate applications made to plants receiving no freezing temperatures prior to being treated have to work on non-injured P. annua. Ethofumesate may also be more effective in the fall because of the germination cycle of P. annua (Chapter 2). During the warmer months of summer P. annua is still germinating. Injured turf could recover by new seedlings filling in bare ground. During the fall P. annua germination declines. Turf that has been injured from ethofumesate has less of a potential for new seedlings filling in injured turf areas when germination rates are lower. 74 a... 3 E o.” MES “Sw— «C— :. 3 2 old. H mm o.» E 2 ed 3.. 3.. 8d med g E3528 8-: 022.: >~5_.Z_ Ame... "A: amu— n; + h; wd + wd 0.0 9.2 .2 we EMDHZ_ Wm m o.” 3 3w 0.x mm —.N ole o.” S ow 3w elm a.— ob Qw o.w 0.x o.w a Qmimn—< EzEz_ ozEEE 5-: 02:3 552 ACE Crap—.9 E 0,]. 7‘ Number in parenthesis is LSD value at 0.05 probability level. 78 Table 4.5. PERCENT REDUCTION OF POA ANNUA CLIPPING WEIGHTS IN FREEZING TEMPERATURES PRIOR TO AN ETHOFUMESATE TREATMENT (Study Four) First Mowing Final Mowing 0 Freezing Day Duration 0.0 kg a.i. ha‘1 0 0 0.3 kg a.i. ha'1 21 37 0.6 kg a.i. ha" 50 37 0.8 kg a.i. ha’I 32 69 5 Freezing Day Duration 0.0 kg a.i. ha’I O 0 0.3 kg a.i. hal 37 49 0.6 kg a.i. hal 37 83 0.8 kg a.i. ha" 69 98 ANOVA Table Freezing Duration (F) ** *** Ethofumesate Rate (E) *** *** F x E NS * (23)? *. **. *** Significant at the 0.05, 0.01. and 0.001 level of probability. respectively; NS. not significant at P > 0.1. + Number in parenthesis is LSD value at 0.05 probability level. 79 .AmanE 35 830E305“. 53, 688: $33 3:53 .m Set $363 wEmEC -085 38m .33 oEwE 35% we: 8mm EamoEEOEm 3.0 ed 3 0 ON ow on uouonpeu lueoiad ow oo. 55 BLT >5 will 55 oil gal Fl 80 AwEBoE EEb 830E338 5:» e88: 333 6:55 .m Soc 8363 mEQEC -025 beam .~.v 223m 355 we: 3mm 8305335 3.0 ed m.o o om d 9 m. w H 9 p n 8 m m. U om 02 55 2+ 3 will 53 0+ 81 AmEBoE H25 830E328 5:» 3:85 833 353 .m :8: meBB wEQEC -58 beam 35% we: 2mm EmmoEEoEm w.o 0.0 md :5 will >5 0+ .3. 23E o o 8 d 9 .J 3 9 w ow H 9 D: n w m. U 8 03 82 AmEBoE 6:5 830E323 5:» @835 $33 355 .m Eoc WEE?» wEaEC -58 35m A933 we: 9mm 0388335 3 3 00 b5 will 55 oil 3...:sz o o om d m 2. m m. “a 9 D. n co m m. U cm 02 83 LITERATURE CITED Ball, A.P., and AR. Roberts. 1974. The use of ethofumesate for weed control in ryegrass seed crops. Proceedings of the 12th British Weed Control Conference. 727—732. Beard, J.B. 1973. Turfgrass: Science and Culture. 67-70. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs. NJ. Coats, GE, and J.V. Krans. 1986. Evaluation of ethofumesate for annual bluegrass (Poa annua) and turfgrass tolerance. Weed Science. 34: 930—935. Demoeden, P.H., and TR. Turner. 1988. Annual bluegrass control and tolerance of kentucky bluegrass and perennial ryegrass to ethofumesate. HortScience. 23: 565—567. Dickens, R. 1981. Rates and timing of ethofumesate applications for annual bluegrass control. Agronomy Abstracts. 124—125. Shearman, RC. 1986. Kentucky bluegrass and annual bluegrass response to ethofumesate. HortScience. 21: 1157—1159. v./Jt¢.:.l....4. ..t, t. l l $3,... llll lll lllll llll Ill ll 04 5154 ll 31293010 l l .2; (a: It: 1.. 4......42r.) 1»... I l l u... . £12.}: 13;. J}. 2.3.... ..,...l. 133:... ; 5.3.: e .3151: . i... ....