.7. .A‘L ttttttt . o 1 s {E .... n . {Itglsfi .... 3. . . y .. it. S \ 5.. .\\:\\ u . .. . ..v ... I a . .... . ...flvwktvi . h. 3.1%.. ~ a .... , o . §W§7sllshfiflx \B‘isxbbu; sssss (335% I). . I I .. ttbtvocttu‘": . ‘8 \lfiié; .933... ”it .1 . . x . g}... wwlfiun ” O g ... ...“ \4. ...)... . EQIJNW ...J‘ ii 335 s zzgé kiosk. 1 I 5.003.525! III... Hut/Wis". \l .1. 31125.. .21.! . S’hnufln. 1V . {v.17}: -1. . ~ 5\.(V)1§ iIIt‘zlxullislni gig §IIIII\\ 1-8432»... .... I a I): Ian... .35.. ..x%‘..§d.év§\bfii ixgs...‘ 15.2.: . ... . 1 ...):IORII‘CIIV I\\ ..‘1 . . \\ 2.5 V \l‘SSIIzAiII. )1“ -9.) , H331...“ I ..\ I . names; .5- III)..K\ .13}; I . . $.23! )n 531.1. 2:. x... )1: 33.2.... I 13.x. 53))... i )1 III‘IL. 1 . . . \ 557.71%..38 .. 11:13)}. «4.1.21.5..5... 3\).2%\$$..12§) . 4 . I . \ £3133!!!sz .... -... Iza~x \SI..)II1\23.I..I 57" 313...! VI‘II’II“... . . 5... In. . . ... . 113).).(4;\\1\)..l..v ..v..\.1.w\.2\.. ‘5- J. .11.. 1 3é\§\5% 5))...(\ z) .33. .. \zluxx)!‘ (... ...thi2\n.\v\\.3\51\.. .13.. . .Is\$\u. .\\2\ 31.). )1...\....)s\ 15!“ I . . . .. . . -.. .1137! ..{1‘2531 ....)1111/.\2..1- -.....‘g 3.259. )2... Vi?.\5.(\l. .... .3. S. .éz?\{§ {.../1.394. I».-5A(.1fl.\\\ \II|\.1\\\...}h-.Sl\. \IIYII‘)‘ 5311‘ 2.5),: I . 5)..)gfiu. )1 25; .\I§\2¢. iyjsi.1\dcmgpi1\§2v \flwgi 5‘ $0....“ \. sci/2&1)?» \V\\\.)I}.\1\5\> 52.31...) ...:ng I it .53).. ‘21.! i§\:g1)$v§é%:$v II {1.3).}. 3:08.59 1.2.5:).3. yigbzsvgz’! ’13... §I It‘)! It..- 1.3.3.41 i§i321i§§I§i g)! b.- JVSZI..II:R£C(.! 512.211). I>.%i\.$lg g I: I» 31 .3. 1(5):}... .3131. $311515 Ill...‘\)sl.v .\\$\|)2.¢0u¢. st. {243. i 1%.»\5§)§1121\i5\\i\IziticiZQQCQ-z; , x 231.33. ...:Iqiil‘...‘ 1:21:23...“ 3.). g is}! ...1.‘ I§C\ ¥§i.§ .. II; {3.5 )III‘ ..IIQHI‘IEI Iii-i . .01. . S)... . 1.1.1.)“, x§i.§:¥‘vifls .i .. in . l x i‘si ix)‘§>\s 1:13,};91‘; 11““ A l g I .II. 4..)I..7. III-II... 13%! 312.212.)..\ \ ...... 132.0!!! 19.}! $11.29.. | I))$)$ 11%)?» 34.25 $33511?» 3!; 7.? «2.11.... 2.: ; LIlfix..Z 33“23.\581.I‘>.z\.tz25§3§3 a, ...)... ..2.\J.}.I11151.flv\.’.~x.tas)\l..\l\z\)k 513.....2. $1..)IlssngSssII) 15112). (... \u‘..3$\§)~l 7 \Idulza}.§\5.7.1‘>v ....Q.) . )vgwl... )1 iii? V}3§‘I\Ifi\ .I\1r51¥§\\\1.i§ .. é)... ngz\z,)I$I..s.l.\xl. 31153.5513I )Y\\.$II\)I)1I$I..\ V)-fiss\3v.i\2\nfizfi$§sfi\fiué o‘clvtvfivi. 0.!- . 3:3, 711 Lw$rfi\\\\§‘4fiz{.z).ix,l.i\§} 3451521.... .V)711I\$‘.~V\\¢¢iz\.lwwx\“s lay; Eggii. . ..Q . . )1. .I I 24:)...hlhlIIhhn. - I .-IL‘SI ..\\1\S\JP..11 x}.\3)fi\2\\5}\3‘\357~\\5231.2.21)!» \luflx.-.{§\ ... 11...} . . I I {1799! ix. ‘1‘)... ... PI 61 .1917). .4...) I.\\f\).(.ll.1 .... gigl. ....I...\\.z (.I)..\5\5\I {...-.13...) 1 11.6%; .. . 1v... . III! 00!! it}. ....IS‘NWBP... .Jfihc?..h.x4h.1$\.dnh.~$.. v..\.mnflw\x.s\vmh.n{ 3‘»); {\Ddlsfiklvg\\fluvzaabiv\b5\ifi\%(5\ I\\ \)\\\H.\)I)C.I7$I04! . it .3. 54...... \314. -351... I...)\ x... ....) ..\...$!|1$)>\I . 53211.34 5“) 25.1.88 \.. .5 E ... 19>) 5355.511): . In.» 0. \5.§\5.53.12§25 v‘.\\\515..1.\ 1.1.5155 ... 111s»... S.)1\.s..\\.\ 1\\I\§\1I~$3$\5hvv.lu\!)fix\n ..., bl... 31-3335“... {I ‘t \5 Eight; .7311..\.(.}.3....\.3121\..7l. 2.55%.4SI\\..I$.IV 1..S‘..I\».)I\..S..\ $12. 15? x13§33z2151 ~31 I 1.22.3. \7I\\.~fi5\\12§\w)5\.1¢. I71... 31.51! vii t0 Zigé E .... {1171.53.51.3W...» ..I‘m gflfivikIzifi‘I .zqsfls.wzs\51\»ztfitiiufi\‘3\\$a Isl. L. ... I) . 1).... 1 .. .8111. .. 22 ...- 2.31.1.1... .. 3:21.325 32...! \sgxlai-.. 2.... 25.... 51:5? .... \. ... g}. .9 Oil! [$01.03.]. III-Dbl 0 i211: i.l\\I.¢.\I$I¢.I£I.I§I I ..IIsl ziiz'ig I}...I7I))VSI{I\3:}.13‘. 1...)... III...) I. .... )v’)?.|§.)l.>l»€))\\’l¢l.n\llpl)2\ .vvfiw {11.12.1315 )2.) 'l.‘ 31: 4.13.3) 13.5.3); )2... ... .../III.I.I.\\..I .14‘«.\5\\11.5\)\1 gygagg $1.1 §s§§i .1.1)1\\I\<4}‘\\I.6~5112i$§ .iaxzuszxxiggvni I l. 3\ 091”“ iiégi: {$111!}.x‘111.‘ \1\ iV}!\P/J. y’aiflzig I. ...)... 5 \ 1.1.2; 5’1!) I)..\\¢..II....I~I.JI.1. 3‘)‘3§1\i§%\9\1§5\3 513. 5112.21»... \\(I§\<. 1’1}... .I («i-1:53; 3153...)..51‘? .5...)..\\.IJJI|$VV3~I.§‘ .a§\311§;~$i1 51:41.93; .1... E‘IIIIII$)$1¢¢$2.JIISI§I§I.} ziziisz§3€\i$I 131.3). 3‘ i1; glik§11§N§£§Y\3/.3 I ...51‘.1I \r 1].; 1\V gig.» II .‘I EIIIrJIunl" SI§§ III)! Ll. §§EI)I)IS\2IS .1. ¥I§§KI§¥§§I )1 \llv\.l.lt1.\.v..¢l )1}. l...‘\ [5.33.53.52.33 )zzxcpi ‘51}..1‘13138r )1 (Ii‘ig \ 5|\lvt“\\$§‘1 It... ((1:15? 53.53)»). 111%)! 221.131. 3134\1 \\I|\ $31....gilxiig in. 0““? .1524. §J$£§13~31II.2)1§ 3.2535... 3.531.. 5. I is).il(s..§ 131$ i fi1..1§\31£.$3 23.32531... 55.... §$§\§§5353)1§§II§I§111 ..\ $i§§§2\wlsgiflvalfillflwll§ig . filugz§ifis5vivggzis1 3Y1 \Ijg iiiifigdwifig.‘ 1.1.3331 1331‘ §1§$§ §§§I§I¥i I ii}. .I\ \\1\\1§21.1\.1\I.Z\\41J3EI isisz‘; izgiziIiIlg)Jiiiz I):I15\§‘IS)I§JII$§$Z} I1... .11 igliii; I§1m11£)§53 .le‘I 1I\!\}1.((..11\.7\1,.SII\ g;\\.¥~§§\\§§ ...w... 111.! ziigig ii.zfil(u§13§ IQ..2);{N§§§T.2§;I? III. 6. gflzUIIIN )1}. 7]) Igg‘wz.§$l§.gii‘zl\%~z 1...... 1......) 35.132! {121315- -2...I.}!22$. 1.1422111223311132... .. g... :4: .2... 3...; (‘31:)... I ..1 x. zgxig§§~vfigifii $334533}; 5! if...“ 131,51}... $11I5¥113 igizgtij5I . {igfih ..7\ I01: t.{ r 11.4.2.1 11..) \1 1.. .‘III...J. 4.11.. siIII.‘\.7)x\ax\.I1;I\SV}«\ III I 3132.215 1.111113% IIIIAI .. xiiiiswligglepu ...; i113141\}115355§p‘2¥1§ . 3173...; $32.37;}; \\.7)1I\.III.is‘}$9i¥l\§..2\z‘§z§§\) .\ 211-13 it! . , .52.13.3112311131..§§K\\‘8IV$\\\L.\ \{1‘51 35137.1. .9; a . . g: 5:11.1173111‘.‘I\.\I)I\(5\\.3‘1.<$I51253)\).l..$9§25fi\ \‘g 1.533. ale-«lit! (Virgin ..tn’lt , 1530‘s... Ignitit... I121}..J:.\..1l)§1)1 vgilaIl’vxlaJ izulizfiiifisgi I)? . ...... ”I. ...!l‘lti? . ...... .gggvijixfid 1.1112(1)... 355.11.11.51... \i!)l.!\~.§1\\ 1.. .... ... “1‘1531181131’; I . .IPtLFDII. . {\er It . {4.5.4.151 \IIII)...‘ {1.1.1}. \‘zlul.,1-.§§§§§)v\fl .l. gig; I ...I . ... .... .-.... ...»: (.... ggis- $%1§)11{1¢4)i-2¢)1 . 3}}3535. 71.45.. 51.52.1331! 3. «ii? 343%.;5- (Ill- -..?iz‘ll.’ .1 ((1-1%...)1 iiiwflgiiii. I??? tilt; ;Z§?\\‘I§I)“1§§ \s...1\.§1.~3 $51213... 12.3.1.1)? ‘It‘giuglnll ... giggligswzfifilg} I . zl’iis }1§.A4I1I\11I1§Izimil§ 5......"IIuI... )1 I! ....liii ... 53-1. filvf’l’l.“ 33.43.40): .31 ... 1%., -7313 3'. iiIiigig airingslé £ . 31...... . .II.‘\.I)\IV\.\I\\.V}1.1\\\..SIIII)\§\ 7 . .11..- . r25}... «I. .. (NEE {33.23% J. 3)... ... its. 1.4.1.1111!!! .7 3. iiiiswwlfvll. \ {$2341.}; . -44....“ 1.. 31.35! .il..411l.2.1l13 i§\sufi4\2.lzi€>1§§ .5133... Ex... I; )%?l.\1§5gg)a ......I 3...... 11.211331: §1\ 1“}; {I} I: 0.98. §§5§§§§3I§izz§3 J... i‘ 1.3311233: ...-bar lt .... .31 3v3111‘§\ I213i§7tlzix 12.1% . {in kit... 11‘“: iiiwiiiihgizgfi‘i :31 ii .1... .... 5153).... i411)... giiiia..i\fiiifi¥fi\§ \I‘l Ilia... sissifiili . \iVIEIIiRI; . «Exits; :31“? iii; IS).I.4.§‘)351. luv..- 1.1.3. 1.5113555 . 1.1.117 It... g; . iiigz}I\§ Ill: §§i§xi§§1£§§§3 iiiI¥izlivsg§w . . . .. . ......Ilb igliIiiigzl‘éi“! I I. §§4i§zi§¥jiigzgili Ilia-..il. . 391:... . 1...; .‘Ifié‘zfiggli 50.1.5...‘ 5.3.5. Iii}; 5.1.51.1 ,{i§31..\lllviiI\ 3.1.; ii thKP. .... I .It .3511... . I 1.122. if; ...L... ... . 53%;).15Ijii.» I! 3.115%}; .441. .....rllbLCIL 5A . it...) £.¥g%¥§‘igsflfi\\§ii%§ . .. . u . .. . . n IllI . )3! 11311171351). ’11). giliii" 11.11;]. ...-......LLIAIU. II.JLL.L..II..\\.\’~IAL|. 11.2.2 ) .3 {iiilt‘g’ . 7i§\it§§§i\ filial-l IIPuIi isgulvzifiiigiiiii‘ 117V . Kl. I . .. iii 1 . L- I 5 $1145.51; iiqgfiié j i‘ght . 11.011119; 1%; ...CIIJI. . I all... . . . . .15).“: .iv'.1yj§l.5§.§>§xs§ll1.13.1131. . III... £l§tl..i... L I §.Ix.%uflfl‘uiiiil.§?{§izgfz (154.1... II ...: .1131. 133...... \ \i‘i§\3\1§\ Tinghrltgafli 11.3.13.“ . ... h"- «EVE. 31.1%;3311‘21‘331‘41; I1 §§I.!Px . .(. x . Iii. s1\§2§4ill.171151 . 53.! . it Pf §.i\{11 .1321 t . -.. L t3§§.§.§ . . .. I}!!! . an. '— _ Lfig'flA IIY Michigan State Graven“? FHESlI This is to certify that the dissertation entitled CHOLINERGIC REGULATION OF FEMALE SEXUAL BEHAVIOR presented by GAR Y PETER D OHAN I CH has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for PhoDo degree in ZOOlogy / Major professor /" \ 4 Date #5} uéuc/a/i/l, W/g/ MS U is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Institution 0-12771 OVERDUE FINES: 25¢ per day per item RETURNING LIBRARY MATERIALS: Place in book neturn to remove charge from circulation records CHOLINERGIC REGULATION OF FEMALE SEXUAL BEHAVIOR By Gary Peter Dohanich A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Zoology 1981 G- I /S‘ ‘75“ 3 ABSTRACT CHOLINERGIC REGULATION OF FEMALE SEXUAL BEHAVIOR By Gary Peter Dohanich The role of cholinergic activity in the regulation of hormone-dependent sexual behavior in female rats was examined. In two experiments, stimulation of cholinergic receptors in specific areas of the brain facilitated the occurrence of sexual behavior. Specifically, carbachol, a cholinergic receptor agonist, increased the incidence of lordosis in estrogen-primed female rats following bilateral microinfusion (0.5 ug/side) into the medial preoptic area or ventromedial hypothalamus. The behavioral response was normally highest 15 min after carbachol infusion and had returned to control levels by 90 min. Intracerebral carb- achol facilitated lordosis at lower levels of estrogen priming than did systemic progesterone which may indicate that carbachol and progesterone achieve their effects by different mechanisms. The ineffectiveness of exogenous progesterone at these low levels of estrogen priming also suggests that carbachol infusion did not facilitate lordosis by inducing the release of adrenal progestins. Carbachol failed to activate lordosis following infusion into the mesencephalic reticular formation or frontal cortex. It appears that the potential of a brain area to respond to cholinergic stimulation may be related to the sensitivity Gary Peter Dohanich of that area to estrogen. In two other experiments, an agent which interferes with central cholinergic activity was found to inhibit sexual behavior displayed by female rats. Bilateral fore- brain infusion of hemicholinium-3 (HO-3, 1.25, 5, or 7.5 ug/side), an acetylcholine synthesis blocker, reduced the incidence of lordosis in females receiving behaviorally- active combinations of estrogen and progesterone. The inhibition of lordosis by HC-3 was prevented when choline chloride (120 ug/side) or carbachol (0.5 ug/side) was simultaneously infused with HC-3. There was no evidence of behavioral inhibition following infusion of HC—3 into the frontal cortex of sexually receptive females. In the final experiment, the ability of estrogen to alter in X2332 binding of a radioactive cholinergic mus- carinic antagonist within certain areas of the brain was demonstrated. However, these data did not consistently support behavioral findings since an expected increase in muscarinic binding was not detected at the estrogen-priming dose (0.125 ug) utilized in behavioral experiments. Furthermore, higher doses of estrogen (1 or 10 ug) increased the number of muscarinic binding sites in the medial basal hypothalamus but decreased the number of muscarinic bindig sites in the medial preoptic area. These experiments suggest that lordosis in female rats is influenced by an estrogen-dependent cholinergic Gary Peter Dohanich mechanism within the brain. The facilitation of lordosis by cholinergic stimulation of specific brain regions does not appear to be correlated with an estrogen—induced increase in cholinergic binding as measured by in vitro uptake of a muscarinic antagonist. "I never been nobody's idol But at least I got a title." - Merle Haggard ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The contributions of various individuals were indis- pensable to the completion of this work. The result is dedicated to those individuals: Dr. Lynwood Clemens for his insight, enthusiasm, and confidence; Jeffrey Witcher for his invaluable collaboration; David Brigham for his capable technical assistance; Cheryl Rapp for her skillful histology and illustrations; and Jo Ann Dohanich for her proficient typing and patience. The advice and guidance of Drs. Edward Convey, Richard Rech, and John King are gratefully acknowledged. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vi LIST OF FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 GENERAL METHOD (Experiments 1-4) . . . . . . . . . . . 21 EXPERIMENT 1. Facilitation of Lordosis in Hormone- treated Female Rats Following Intra- cerebral Infusion of Carbachol . . . . 25 MTHOD I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 26 RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 SUMMARY I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 32 EXPERIMENT 2. Brain Regions Implicated in Cho- linergic Mediation of Lordosis . . . . 33 METHOD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 RESULTS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 314’ SUNHVIARY I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 36 EXPERIMENT 3. Inhibition of Lordosis in Hormone- treated Female Rats Following Intracerebral Infusion of Hemicholinium-3 . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 EXPER INENT 38- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I LPO METHOD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 RESULTS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 41 EXPER INENT 3b I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Li’s NETH OD I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 45 RESULTS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 46 EXPER INENT 3 C I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 48 NETHOD I I I I I I I I I I I I I I O I I I I L"9 RESULTS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 50 SUNHVIARY I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 50 iv Table of Contents cont'd Page EXPERIMENT 4. Reversal of Hemicholinium-3 In- hibition of Lordosis by Carbachol . . . 53 NETHOD e o o e e e e e e o e o o o o o e e e o o 53 RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 SUNHVIARY o o e o o e o e o e e o e o e o e e o e o 58 EXPERIMENT 5. Alterations in Cholinergic Binding Sites within Specific Brain Areas Following Estrogen Treatment . . . . . 59 NETHOD o e o e e e e e e e e e e o e e e o e o 60 RESULTS 0 e e e o e e e e o o e o e e o 61 SUNHVIARY a o I o 0 o o o o o o o o e e e e e e 0 64 DISCUSSION 0 e e o e e e e e e o o e e e o e o e e o e 68 LIST OF REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 Table LIST OF TABLES Page Proportion of Female Rats Responding Following Intracerebral Infusion of Carb— achol or Artificial Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Vehicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 Mean Lordosis Quotients Recorded from Female Rats Following Bilateral Infusion of Hemicholinium—3 into the Frontal Cortex . . . 52 Musoarinic Binding in the Parietal Cortex and Caudate Putamen Following Estradiol Benzoate (EB) Treatment . . . . . . . . . . . 63 Vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Distribution of cannula tips as verified histo- logically in female rats from Experiment 1 . . . Mean lordosis quotients recorded from female rats followin bilateral infusion of carb- achol (0.5 u cannula) or artificial cerebro- spinal fluid (CSF) vehicle into the medial preoptic area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mean lordosis quotients recorded from female rats following bilateral infusion of carbachol (0.5 ug/cannula) or artificial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) vehicle into various brain areas . . Carbachol infusion sites in the medial preoptic area (upper left), ventromedial hypothalamus (upper right), frontal cortex (lower left), and mesencephalic reticular formation (lower right) . Distribution of cannula tips as verified histo- logically in female rats from Experiments 3 . . Mean lordosis quotients (LQ) recorded from female rats following bilateral infusion of hemicholinium-3 (HG-3, 5 or 7.5 ug/cannula) or artificial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) vehicle into the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis . . Mean lordosis quotients (LQ) recorded from female rats following bilateral infusion of hemicholinium-3 (HG-3, 5 ug/cannula) or artificial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) vehicle into the medial preoptic area . . . . . . . . Mean lordosis quotients (LQ) recorded from female rats following bilateral infusion of hemicholinium—3 (HO-3, 5 ug/cannula) or HC—3 (5 ug/cannula) plus choline chloride (120 ug/ cannula) into the medial preoptic area . . . . . Distribution of cannula tips as verified histo- logically in female rats from Experiment 4 . . . vii Page 27 30 35 38 43 A4 47 51 54 List of Figures cont'd Figure Page 10 Upper panel. Mean lordosis quotients recorded from female rats following bilateral infusion of hemicholinium-3 (HO-3, 1.25 ug/cannula) or HC-3 (1.25 ug/cannula) plus carbachol (0.5 ug/ cannula) into the medial preoptic area. Lower panel. Linear regression lines of lordosis quo- tient on log1o transformed EB doses for pretests and 45 min tests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 11 Specific binding of 3H quinuclidinyl benzilate (QNB) in synaptosomal preparations of tissue from the medial basal hypothalamus (MBH; left) and medial preoptic area (POA: right) of female rats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 12 Scatchard plot of specific 3H quinuclidinyl benzilate (QNB) binding in the medial basal hypothalamus (MBH; upper) and medial preoptic area (POA; lower) of female rats treated with estradiol benzoate (EB, 10 ug) or 0.1 ml sesame seed oil 72, 48, and 24 hr before sacrifice . . . 66 viii INTRODUCTION Various behaviors which increase the probability of successful mating have evolved in vertebrates. Lordosis is a distinctive posture assumed by females of several mammalian species during the period of sexual receptivity. It is characterized by flexion of the epaxial muscles which causes a ventral arching of the spine and elevation of the perineum (Pfaff, 1980). In species such as the rat, in which the male achieves multiple intromissions before ejaculating, lordosis promotes genital stimulation of both sexes and facilitates sperm deposition during ejaculation. The lordosis reSponse is elicited in the female rat by the mount of a male and is dependent on somatosensory stimu- lation to the flanks, rump,and tail base (Pfaff, 1980). Steroid hormones secreted by the ovary are clearly the principle hormonal factors controlling lordosis (Young, 1961). Accordingly, removal of the ovaries abolishes the capacity for sexual behavior in female rats. Sexual behavior is restored in ovariectomized females by systemic administration of estrogen (estradiol) followed by progesterone (Boling and Blandau, 1939). This treatment regimen mimics the natural hormonal profile of the intact cyclic female such that maximum receptivity is preceded by several days of rising estrogen titers followed by a 1 2 brief increase in progesterone levels (Clemens and Christensen, 1975). However, when given in sufficient quantities, estradiol alone will activate a high incidence of lordosis in ovariectomized female rats (Pfaff, 1970). Although lordosis has been described as a stereotyped reflex (Pfaff, 1980), the neuroendocrine mechanisms which regulate the occurrence of this behavior are complex. The selective uptake of estradiol from the circulation by specific areas of the brain appears to be prerequisite. Visualization of tritiated estradiol uptake by autoradio- graphy has identified the medial preoptic area (POA) and the ventromedial hypothalamus (VMH) as two forebrain areas with dense distributions of neurons which concentrate estradiol (Pfaff and Keiner, 1973). The ability of preoptic and hypothalamic neurons to take up estradiol suggests that these particular cells may direct the perfor- mance of an estrogen-dependent behavior such as lordosis. Appropriately, results obtained with a variety of techniques have implicated both the POA and the VMH in the control of estrogen-activated lordosis. For example, estradiol benzoate (EB) has been reported to activate sexual receptivity in ovariectomized rats within several days after direct implantation in either the POA or the VMH (Lisk, 1962; Lisk and Barfield, 1975; Yanase and Gorski, 1976; Barfield and Chen, 1977). The VMH appears to be particularly sensitive to estrogen stimulation since a higher incidence of lordosis was observed in female rats 3 following implantation of EB in the VMH than was observed following implantation of EB in the POA (Barfield and Chen, 1977). Furthermore, dilute estradiol implants confined to the VMH activated lordosis in female rats when combined with systemic administration of progesterone (Rubin and Barfield, 1980). However, this same treatment was ineffec- tive when dilute estradiol implants were placed in other brain areas including the POA. In addition to displaying different sensitivities to estrogen, evidence suggests that the POA and VMH may exert different actions in mediating female sexual behavior. Although lesions of the VMH have been demonstrated to inhibit lordosis in female rats treated with estrogen (Mathews and Edwards, 1977), lesions of the POA increased the potential of estrogen—treated females to display lor- dosis (Powers and Valenstein, 1972)o Further, electrical stimulation of the VMH facilitated lordosis (Pfaff and Sakuma, 1979) while stimulation of the POA has been found to inhibit lordosis (Malsbury and Pfaff, 1973). Finally, EB has been shown to increase the number of cells in the VMH displaying detectable spontaneous activity while decreasing their number in the POA (Bueno and Pfaff, 1976). These results seem to suggest that the VMH exerts an excitatory influence over estrogen—activated lordosis and the POA exerts a tonic inhibitory influence. In contrast to the POA and VMH, implantation of BB in the mesencephalic reticular formation (MRF) failed to Ll, facilitate lordosis in female rats (Yanase and Gorski, 1976). However, combinations of EB implants in the MRF with systemically injected progesterone or progesterone implants in the MRF with systemically injected EB activated a high incidence of lordosis (Ross, Claybaugh, Clemens, and Gorski, 1971; Yanase and Gorski, 1976). Furthermore, local exposure to estrogen was necessary for MRF implants of progesterone to be effective (Yanase and Gorski, 1976). Although the MRF does not concentrate tritiated estradiol as proficiently as basal forebrain areas (Pfaff and Keiner, 1973) mesencephalic control of female sexual behavior nevertheless may be mediated by an interaction between estrogen and progesterone. The sequence of events initiated by intracellular uptake of estradiol and culminating in the lordosis response is presently speculative. However, evidence (O'Malley and Means, 1974; Woo and O'Malley, 1975) that ovarian hormones regulate the synthesis of specific proteins within the chick oviduct by interaction with the cellular genome may have important implications for the hormonal control of sexual behavior. A hormone, such as estrogen, is believed to diffuse passively into the cyto- plasm of a target cell from the general circulation and bind to high-affinity receptor proteins. These hormone- receptor complexes are subsequently translocated into the cell nucleus where they interact with nonhistone chromo- somal proteins. This interaction facilitates transcription 5 of new messenger RNA, with the location of the nonhistone protein on the DNA molecule determining the code sequence of the messenger RNA synthesized. Consequently, these events may result in ribosomal formation of various proteins which regulate cellular function and composition. The process by which ovarian hormones influence syn— thesis of proteins in the chick oviduct is clearly applic- able to estrogen target cells in the brain. It has been suggested that exposure of appropriate brain areas to estrogen may alter the activity of various putative neuro- transmitter systems, thereby activating the neural circui— try which mediates female sexual behavior (McEwen, Davis, Parsons, and Pfaff, 1979). Conceivably, the synthesis of a wide variety of transmitter-related proteins may be influenced by the presence of estrogen within a cell. For instance, estrogen might effect an alteration in neuro- transmitter activity by regulating the production of enzymes which are responsible for the synthesis or degradation of a particular neurotransmitter. Alterna- tively, estrogen might control the synthesis or degra- dation of membrane-bound neurotransmitter receptor proteins, modify the formation of enzymes involved in secondary cyclase systems, or determine the level of various intra- cellular transport proteins. Although the specific mechanism or mechanisms have yet to be identified, evidence supports the conclusion that the activation of lordosis by estrogen is dependent 6 upon protein synthesis. Actinomycin D, an inhibitor of DNA-dependent RNA synthesis, blocked estrogen- progesterone-induced lordosis in female rats when applied to the POA, VMH, or third ventricle within 12 hr after estrogen treatment (Quadagno, Shryne, and Gorski, 1971; Terkel, Shryne, and Gorski, 1973; Ho, Quadagno, Cooke, and Gorski, 1973). Cyclohexamide, an inhibitor of protein synthesis, produced an identical effect on lordosis following infusion into the POA or third ventricle (Quadagno and Ho, 1975). More recently, systemic admini— stration of anisomycin, a protein synthesis inhibitor with low toxicity, was reported to block estrogen-progesterone— activated lordosis, as well as induction of a specific protein, the progestin receptor, in the POA and VMH (Rainbow, Davis, and McEwen, 1980). These results indicate that some form of estrogen—induced protein synthesis within preoptic and hypothalamic neurons is critical to the occurrence of lordosis. If estrogen activates lordosis in female rats by altering the activity of certain neurotransmitters within the brain, then pharmacological manipulations which produce similar alterations in neurotransmitter activity should also activate lordosis. Meyerson (1964) first demonstrated that systemic administration of agents which depleted the level of whole brain serotonin facilitated lordosis in female rats. However, these antiserotonergic compounds were only effective in ovariectomized females that had been 7 pretreated with low doses of estrogen. Since the original work of Meyerson, every known major neurotransmitter system has been shown to influence the display of sexual behavior in female rodents in some manner. Consistently, the ability of any pharmacological agent to increase the inci- dence of lordosis in female rodents has been contingent upon estrogen pretreatment. The importance of neuro— transmitter functions to sexual behavior now appears certain and the potential of estrogen to regulate the activity of these neurotransmitter systems is a logical mechanism of hormone action. However, at present, it is > not possible to completely circumvent the role of estrogen by pharmacologically altering the activity of neuro- transmitters which mediate lordosis. This observation suggests that estrogen probably influences a number of cellular functions which are critical to lordosis. The initial finding that pharmacological depletion of brain serotonin facilitated lordosis in female rats primed with estrogen (Meyerson, 1964) was later confirmed and extended by several investigators. Increases in the frequency of lordosis were reported in estrogen—treated female rats following administration of a serotonin syn- thesis inhibitor, parachlorophenylalanine (PCPA); serotonin receptor blockers, methysergide and cinanserin; or serotonin release and reuptake blockers, reserpine and tetrabenazine (Meyerson and Lewander, 1970; Zemlan, Ward, Crowley, and Margules, 1973; Everitt, Fuxe, and Hokfelt, 8 1974; Everitt, Fuxe, Hokfelt, and Jonsson, 1975; Ward, Crowley, Zemlan, and Margules, 1975; Eliasson and Meyerson, 1977; Foreman and Moss, 1978a). In addition, reductions in the incidence of lordosis were observed in sexually receptive female rats following treatment with agents which enhance central serotonin activity such as monoamine oxidase inhibitors, lysergic acid diethylamide, 5-hydroxytryptophan, fenfluramine, or serotonin (Meyerson, 1966; Eliasson, Michanek, and Meyerson, 1972; Everitt et al., 1974, 1975; Meyerson, Carrer, and Eliasson, 1974; Eliasson, 1976; Eliasson and Meyerson, 1976, 1977; Foreman and Moss, 1978a). Furthermore, the POA, VMH, anterior hypothalamus, posterior hypothalamus, and medial forebrain bundle have been identified as active sites in this inhibitory serotonergic system (Ward et al., 1975; Foreman and Moss, 1978a). Despite this impressive body of evidence, reservations have been raised concerning the validity of serotonergic inhibition of lordosis. It has been suggested that increases in the incidence of lordosis following treatment with antiserotonergic agents may be due to a drug-induced release of adrenal steroids, particularly progesterone (reviewed by Clemens, 1978). In support of this con- tention, PCPA failed to facilitate lordosis in adrenalec- tomized, estrogen-primed rats (Eriksson and Sodersten, 1973). Reserpine was similarly ineffective in adrenalec- tomized, estrogen-primed mice (Uphouse, Wilson, and 9 Schlesinger, 1970). Furthermore, an increased concen- tration of plasma progesterone was detected in female rats following reserpine treatment (Paris, Resko, and Goy, 1971). When the rise in plasma progesterone was prevented by pretreatment with a corticotropin suppressor, reserpine failed to facilitate lordosis in estrogen-primed females. In contrast, other reports have demonstrated that the acti- vation of lordosis by PCPA or methysergide treatment per- sisted in absence of the adrenal glands (Zemlan et al., 1973) although the magnitude of response may be reduced (Everitt et al., 1975). Since PCPA was found to deplete brain catecholamines, as well as brain serotonin, the roles of dopamine and norepinephrine in the mediation of lordosis have also received considerable attention. Indeed, the increase in the frequency of lordosis observed following PCPA treatment was reported to be temporally correlated with a reduction in brain catecholamine content rather than with a reduction in brain serotonin level (Ahlenius, Engel, Eriksson, Modigh, and Sodersten, 1972). However, much of the subsequent research on the effects of the catecholamines on female sexual behavior has proven to be ambiguous and contra- dictory. Some of this confusion appears to stem from the multiple receptor types which are believed to mediate catecholamine transmission. Support for an inhibitory dopaminergic system was provided by a series of pharmacological experiments. 10 Systemic administration of alpha methylparatyrosine, a catecholamine synthesis inhibitor, or pimozide, a dopamine receptor blocker, facilitated lordosis in female rats primed with estrogen (Ahlenius et al., 1972; Everitt et al., 1974, 1975; Davis and Kohl, 1977; Fuxe, Everitt, and Hokfelt, 1977). Adrenalectomy failed to reduce this response to dopamine antagonists (Everitt et al., 1974, 1975). In addition, dopamine receptor agonists, such as apomorphine and ET 495, were found to reduce the frequency of lordosis in females brought into receptivity by administration of estrogen and progesterone (Everitt et al., 1974, 1975; Eliasson, 1976). Pretreatment with pimozide prevented the reduction in lordosis induced by apomorphine, further implicating a dopaminergic system (Meyerson, Carrer, and Eliasson, 1974; Eliasson and Meyerson, 1976). An inhib- ition of lordosis following d-amphetamine treatment was also reported to be blocked by pimozide pretreatment (Michanek and Meyerson, 1977). Furthermore, selective depletion of brain catecholamines by intraventricular administration of a neurotoxin, 6-hydroxydopamine, increased the incidence and duration of lordosis in female rats primed with estrogen (Herndon, Caggiula, Sharp, Ellis, and Redgate, 1978; Caggiula, Herndon, Scanlon, Greenstone, Bradshaw, and Sharp, 1979). Although these results suggest a significant inhib- itory role for a central dopamine system, several exper- iments directly contradict this conclusion. For example, 11 in contrast to the purported inhibitory effects of dopa— mine receptor agonists, a facilitation of lordosis has also been reported in hormone-primed female rats following systemic administration of apomorphine or ET 495 (Hamburger-Bar and Rigter, 1975; Everitt and Fuxe, 1977). This facilitation was not mediated by release of adrenal steroids (Hamburger—Bar and Rigter, 1975). These contra- dictory effects of dopamine receptor agonists on lordosis may be related to drug dose. While high doses of agonists inhibit lordosis in estrogen-progesterone-treated females, low doses appear to facilitate lordosis in estrogen-primed females. Everitt and Fuxe (1977) have attempted to recon- cile these effects with the concept of an inhibitory dopa— minergic system. They suggest that, at high doses, dopa- mine agonists act at postsynaptic receptors to inhibit lordosis; whereas, at low doses, these agonists act at presynaptic receptors to reduce endogenous dopamine release and thereby facilitate lordosis. Although appealing, this hypothesis has yet to be substantiated. A facilitative role for dopamine has also been indi- cated by infusion of dopaminergic agents into various brain areas. Microinfusion of dopamine or apomorphine into the POA or VMH was found to increase the incidence of lordosis in hormone—primed female rats (Foreman and Moss, 1979; Dohanich and Clemens, 1980). Conversely, the fre- quency of lordosis was reduced in females treated with high doses of estrogen following preoptic or hypothalamic 12 infusion of dopamine receptor blockers, haloperidol and alpha flupenthixol (Foreman and Moss, 1979). However, since the maximum behavioral reSponse to dopamine infusion usually was observed 1-2 hr after infusion, it is difficult to interpret this effect as a direct neurotransmitter action. The contribution of adrenal steroids, although not assessed, may represent a significant factor in these intracerebral infusion experiments. ,As in the case of dopamine, the role of norepinephrine in the control of hormone-dependent lordosis has not been well defined. A facilitative influence of the noradrener- gic system was initially indicated by the observation that d-amphetamine potentiated the stimulatory effect of a dopamine receptor blocker, pimozide, on lordosis (Everitt et al., 1975). It was suggested that this enhancement was due to an amphetamine-induced release of norepinephrine. More recently, infusion of norepinephrine into the POA or VMH was reported to increase the incidence of lordosis in estrogen-primed female rats (Foreman and Moss, 1978b). Selective stimulation of beta noradrenergic receptors in the POA or VMH by infusion of isoproterenol similarly facilitated lordosis while blocking beta receptors by infusion of propranolol inhibited lordosis (Foreman and Moss, 1978bL However, the possible dependence of noradrenergic facilitation of lordosis on adrenal steroid release has not been determined. Several experiments have also indicated an inhibitory 13 role for norepinephrine. Generally, systemic or intra- cerebral administration of alpha noradrenergic receptor blockers such as piperoxane, yohimbine, phentolamine, or phenoxybenzamine has been found to increase the frequency of lordosis in estrogen-primed females (Everitt et al., 1975; Foreman and Moss, 1978b%. In addition, lordosis was inhibited in receptive females following treatment with alpha noradrenergic receptor agonists, clonidine and methoxamine (Davis and Kohl, 1977; Foreman and Moss, 1978b). The inhibition of lordosis by clonidine was prevented by pretreatment with the alpha receptor antagonist, yohimbine, but not by the alpha receptor antagonist, phenoxybenzamine. Davis and Kohl (1977) suggested, therefore, that noradre- nergic alpha receptors may be present in two forms with unequal potential to inhibit lordosis. Consequently, in the rat, available data seem to indi- cate a facilitative role for beta noradrenergic receptors and an inhibitory role for alpha noradrenergic receptors in the mediation of hormone-induced lordosis. Alterna- tively, norepinephrine appears to exert a major facili- tative action on lordosis in the guinea pig based on observations that agents which promote noradrenergic activity, such as clonidine, increased lordosis duration while agents which reduce noradrenergic activity, such as phenoxybenzamine or a norepinephrine synthesis blocker, inhibited the display of lordosis (Crowley, Feder, and Morin, 1976; Crowley, Neck, and Feder, 1978; Neck and 14 Feder, 1979). Only one report presently available documents the role of the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) system in the control of lordosis (McGinnis, Gordon, and Gorski, 1980). Picro- toxin, a GABA receptor blocker, was found to decrease the incidence of lordosis in estrogen-progesterone—treated female rats following bilateral infusion into the sub- stantia nigra. In addition, the frequency of lordosis was increased in estrogen-primed females by bilateral nigral infusion of hydrazinopropionic acid (HPA), an agent which reduces GABA degradation. The maximum behavioral reSponse occurred 2 hr after HPA infusion. The authors suggest that increased nigral GABA facilitated lordosis by inhibiting dopamine activity in the striatum and nucleus accumbens. However, the delayed onset of an HPA effect and the failure to control for HPA-induced release of adrenal steroids weaken their conclusion. Furthermore, although evidence is presented that dopamine activity was modified in the striatum and nucleus accumbens following nigral infusion of GABAminergic agents, a proposed inhibitory effect of dopa- mine on lordosis is itself tenuous. The role of each of the major neurotransmitter systems reviewed thus far may be summarized. A substantial amount of evidence strongly indicates that serotonin exerts an inhibitory action on lordosis. The facilitation of lordosis following treatment with certain agents which reduce serotonergic activity may be the result of adrenal 15 steroid secretion. However, the ability of several anti- serotonergic compounds to activate lordosis in adrenalec- tomized females clearly implies a central action of sero- tonin. The contribution of other neurotransmitter systems to the control of lordosis is not as well characterized. Dopamine activity has been reported to exert either facili- tative or inhibitory actions on lordosis depending on the experimental contingency. Agonists, as well as antago- nists, increased the incidence of lordosis in estrogen- primed female rats even following adrenalectomy. The suggestion that these contradictory effects may be mediated by two types of dopamine receptors, presynaptic and post- synaptic, has yet to be confirmed experimentally. Similarly, both facilitative and inhibitory actions have been described for the norepinephrine system.. It has been hypothesized that stimulation of beta receptors activates lordosis, whereas, stimulation of alpha receptors inhibits lordosis. However, the available evidence is weak, parti- cularly since a facilitation of lordosis by beta agonists has not been demonstrated in adrenalectomized females. Finally, recent data indicate a facilitative role of brain GABA in the control of lordosis. Again, the possible contribution of adrenal steroids has not been determined. Furthermore, the proposed mediation of the facilitative effect of GABA by the dopamine system must be regarded as speculative. The remaining major neurotransmitter, acetylcholine, 16 may represent another central influence on hormone- activated lordosis. Lindstrom and Meyerson (1967) reported that systemic administration of cholinergic receptor agonists such as pilocarpine, oxotremorine, or arecoline reduced the incidence of lordosis in female rats primed with estrogen and progesterone. This inhibition was observed within 30 min after injection and was prevented by pretreatment with atropine, a cholinergic receptor blocker. Systemic pretreatment with methylatropine, an agent which only blocks cholinergic receptors in the periphery, failed to prevent the reduction in lordosis by cholinergic ago- nists, implying a central action of these compounds. Lindstrom (1970) later found that the inhibition of lordosis following pilocarpine treatment was magnified when females were pretreated with monoamine oxidase inhibitors, pargyline or nialamide. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors were previously shown to inhibit lordosis in receptive females, presumably by increasing central monoaminergic, princi— pally serotonergic activity (Meyerson, 1964). Lindstrom suggested, therefore, that elevations in cholinergic and monoaminergic activity may inhibit lordosis by related mechanisms. Subsequently, it was demonstrated that pre- treatment with the monoamine synthesis inhibitor PCPA prevented the inhibition of lordosis by pilocarpine (Lindstrom, 1971). Furthermore, pretreatment with a catecholamine synthesis inhibitor failed to block the inhibitory effects of pilocarpine. Lindstrom concluded 17 that pilocarpine inhibited lordosis in estrogen-progester— one—treated females via a serotonergic mechanism. Pilocarpine and oxotremorine were also reported to increase the incidence of lordosis in female rats primed with estrogen (Lindstrom, 1973). In contrast to the short latency of the inhibitory effects previously observed (30 min), the facilitation of lordosis by cholinergic agonists occurred 4 hrs after systemic injection. The increase was blocked by atropine pretreatment, reinforcing a cholinergic interpretation. However, cholinergic agonists failed to facilitate lordosis in estrogen-primed females that had been adrenalectomized, hypophysectomized, or pretreated with a corticotropin suppressor. Consequently, it appears that the enhancement of lordosis following pilocarpine or oxotremorine treatment was dependent on a drug—induced release of adrenal steroids. The work of Lindstrom suggests that the inhibitory effect of cholinergic agonists is mediated by a sero— tonergic mechanism while the facilitative effect of cho— linergic agonists is mediated by adrenal steroids. The cholinergic compounds used by Lindstrom act primarily at cholinergic muscarinic receptors. A more recent study (Fuxe et al., 1977), indicated that stimulation of cho~ linergic nicotinic receptors following systemic admini— stration of nicotine increased the incidence of lordosis in estrogen—primed female rats. This facilitation was observed within 5 min after injection and was blocked by 18 pretreatment with a nicotinic receptor blocker but not by pretreatment with catecholaminergic agents. Although the effect of nicotine treatment on lordosis was not evaluated in adrenalectomized females, it is doubtful that adrenal steroids would activate lordosis within 5 min after release. Rodgers and Law (1968) implanted a muscarinic receptor agonist, carbachol, or a muscarinic receptor blocker, atropine, in various brain areas and reported a facili- tation of lordosis in ovariectomized female rats. The failure to prime females with estrogen and the negligible level of reSponse to intracerebral treatments make the significance of their results difficult to interpret. However, evidence has recently been presented which strongly suggests that stimulation of central cholinergic muscarinic receptors facilitates lordosis independently of adrenal secretions, contradicting the early reports of Lindstrom. Implantation of muscarinic receptor agonists carbachol and bethanechol in the POA or MRF consistently activated lordosis in female rats primed with estrogen (Clemens, Humphrys, and Dohanich, 1980). This facilitation was usually observed within 30 min of intracerebral treat- ment, persisted in the absence of the adrenal glands, and was blocked by pretreatment with the muscarinic receptor blocker atropine. In support of a facilitative role of muscarinic receptors, Singer (1968) earlier reported that systemic administration of a high dose of atropine alone 19 reduced the incidence of lordosis in female rats treated with estrogen and progesterone. The experiments comprising this dissertation were designed to extend the analysis of cholinergic facili- tation of sexual receptivity in female rats. Several design features were introduced in order to more fully characterize this phenomenon. The contradictory behavioral effects often observed following treatment with various pharmacological agents may arise partly from the mode of administration. The systemic injection technique often exposes the entire brain, if not the entire body of an organism, to the drug. Nonphysiological reSponses under these experimental conditions may be expected. Conse- quently, in order to limit drug actions to specific areas of the brain, cholinergic agents were applied directly to brain sites implicated in the control of female sexual behavior. In addition, compounds were administered in solution form via a microinfusion technique which delivers low doses of a drug and provides transient stimulation of specific brain areas not possible with traditional intra- cerebral implants of crystalline compounds. The effects of a cholinergic agonist, carbachol, as well as a cholinergic antagonist, hemicholinium-3, were investigated. Since cholinergic mediation of lordosis appears to be a hormone- dependent phenomenon, the behavioral responses of female rats following intracerebral cholinergic treatment were examined under a variety of estrogen and estrogen- 20 progesterone regimens. Finally, the ability of manipu- lations of the cholinergic system to influence sexual behavior may indicate that ovarian homones alter cho— linergic processes within the brain. In the last experi- ment, the effect of estrogen treatment on a cholinergic parameter, specifically muscarinic receptor binding, was evaluated in specific areas of the female rat brain. GENERAL METHOD (Experiments 1-4) Sherman female rats, 60—70 days of age, were obtained from Camm Research Company, Wayne, New Jersey. The animals were housed singly with free access to food and water. A reversed light-dark cycle was maintained in the Vivarium (14 hr light: 10 hr dark, light off at 1100 hr). Females were placed under ether anesthesia '(Mallinckrodt, Inc.) or Ketamine anesthesia (Parke, Davis, and Co.) and bilaterally ovariectomized at 75-85 days of age. To verify a normal behavioral response to exogenous hormone treatment, all ovariectomized females were pretested for lordosis prior to stereotaxic surgery. Females were injected intramuscularly with 0.5 ug estra— diol benzoate (EB, Schering Corp.) 72, 48, and 24 hr before behavioral testing. Approximately 5 hr before testing 0.5 mg progesterone (Sigma Chemical Co.) was injected intramuscularly. EB and progesterone were administered in 0.1 ml volumes of sesame seed oil (Sigma Chemical 00.). Hormone doses always represent the total dose administered to each animal per day. Behavioral tests were conducted in a Plexiglas arena (45 x 50 x 58 cm) occupied by a Long-Evans stimulus male (Charles River Laboratories). Each female was mounted a 21 22 total of 10 times during a single test. Any female failing to receive 10 mounts within 10 min was transferred to another arena with a different male where the test was completed. The number of lordosis responses observed per 10 mounts was recorded and a lordosis quotient was computed for each female: L0 = (number of lordoses/10 mounts) x 100. Females displaying an LQ of 70 or higher on the pretest underwent stereotaxic surgery under ether or Ketamine anesthesia approximately 1 wk later. Cho— linergic drugs were infused intracerebrally via a double- barrel cannula assembly constructed from stainless—steel hypodermic tubing (Small Parts, Inc.). Each assembly consisted of a chronic 23 gauge outer barrel (guide) and a removable 27 gauge inner barrel (insert). Guides were implanted bilaterally 1 mm dorsal to the target brain sites and anchored to the skull with machine screws and dental acrylic. Each insert extended 1 mm beyond the end of the guide into the brain site. Stereotaxic coordinates were provided by Albe-Fessard, Stutinsky, and Libouban (1966) for five different sites as follows: POA (anterior 7.9, lateral 1.0, horizontal 4.0); VMH (anterior 5.8, lateral 0.8, horizontal 2.0); MRF (anterior 3.2, lateral 1.0, horizontal 2.0); stria terminalis (anterior 7.9, lateral 1.0, horizontal 5.5); frontal cortex (anterior 10.0, lateral 1.0, horizontal 9.0). 23 One wk after stereotaxic surgery all females were injected with EB 72, 48, and 24 hr before behavioral testing. The dose of EB administered varied with experi- ment. In some experiments, 0.5 mg progesterone or 0.1 ml sesame seed oil was injected intramuscularly 4-5 hr before behavioral testing. Prior to intracerebral infusion, the insert was removed and replaced by a 28 gauge infusion insert which extended into the target site. The infusion insert was connected by PE—20 polyethylene tubing to a syringe mounted on a reciprocal microinfusion pump (Harvard Apparatus). A 0.5 ul volume of solution was delivered over 30 sec sequentially through each cannula (1 ul/animal). Following infusion, the infusion insert was replaced by the original insert. For intracerebral infusions, cholinergic compounds were dissolved in an artificial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) containing 130 mM NaCl, 25 mM Na H003, 5 mM NaZH P04, 30 mM KCL, 8 mM Mg 012, and 13 mM CaCl2 (pH 6.8). The agents administered included carbamylcholine chloride (carbachol, Sigma Chemical 00.), hemicholinium—3 (HG-3, Aldrich Chemical 00.), and choline chloride (Sigma Chemical 00.). During the test session each female was pretested for lordosis and, immediately after, was bilaterally infused with the appropriate drug or vehicle solution. The effects of intracerebral treatment on lordosis were tested at various times after infusion during 1—3 weekly sessions. After the final behavioral test, all females were 24 anesthetized with ether or phenobarbital and perfused intracardially with 0.9% saline followed by 10% buffered formalin. Brains were removed and frozed coronal brain sections (50 u) were taken. Implant locations were verified following neutral red staining. Data were analyzed with parametric analyses of variance usually followed by Newman-Keuls range tests (Winer, 1971) or with nonparametric Kruskall-Wallis analyses of variance, Mann-Whitney U—tests, Wilcoxon matched pairs T tests, or Fisher exact probability tests (Siegel, 1956). Log transformations were made where appropriate. EXPERIMENT 1. Facilitation of Lordosis in Hormone—treated Female Rats Following Intracerebral Infusion of Carbachol Intracerebral implants of cholinergic agonists in crystalline form have been found to increase the inci- dence of lordosis in female rats primed for 3 days with 1 ug EB (Clemens et al., 1980). The facilitation of lordosis occurred 30-60 min after intracerebral treatment and persisted up to 120 min. Unfortunately, the crys- talline implant technique delivers a high, and often inexact, dose of a drug (approximately 10 ug) to the brain site, activating a behavioral response which may be sus- tained for hours. Under these conditions, the effects of repeated behavioral tests and adrenal steroid release may contribute to the prolonged behavioral response often observed. In Experiment 1, the ability of carbachol, a cholinergic receptor agonist, to facilitate lordosis in female rats was investigated using a microinfusion tech— nique which provides precise control of drug dose and limits the duration of drug stimulation. This procedure should elicit a reliable, prompt, and transient facili- tation of behavior. The effect of carbachol on lordosis was evaluated under a variety of hormone priming conditions. Systemic administration of progesterone is known to activate 25 26 lordosis in female rats treated with EB (Boling and Blandau, 1939). Since progesterone, as well as cho- linergic agonists, facilitate lordosis in estrogen-primed females, a common mechanism may underlie their actions. In Experiment 1, the behavioral effects of progesterone, administered by systemic injection, and carbachol, admin- istered by intracerebral infusion, were compared. Female rats were treated with either EB and progesterone, EB and carbachol, or EB, progesterone, and carbachol. The various doses of EB selected (0.13, 0.17, and 0.25 ug for 3 days) activate only a low to moderate incidence of lordosis, even when combined with progesterone treatment. The doses of progesterone (0.5 mg) and carbachol (0.5 ug/cannula) activate a high incidence of lordosis when combined with adequate amounts of estrogen. Utilizing a series of low EB doses, in combination with optimum doses of progesterone and/or carbachol, allowed comparison of the behavioral effects of progesterone and carbachol, as well as assessing the summation of their actions. METHOD Ovariectomized female rats were bilaterally implanted with cannulae in the POA according to the procedure out- lined in the General Method section (See Figure 1). Implanted females received 3 weekly tests beginning 1 wk after stereotaxic surgery. All females were primed with 0.13 ug EB at 72, 48, and 24 hr prior to the first weekly arm 0...}... ...-5. . , Figure 1. 27 DOR Distribution of cannula tips as verified histologically in female rats from Experiment 1. Only animals with implants in the areas indi— cated were included in data analysis. The plate represents a sagittal section takem 1.0 mm lateral to the midline. Adapted from Albe— Fessard et al. (1966). Abbreviations: ANT, anterior; DOR, dorsal; ac, anterior commissure; aha, anterior hypothalamic area; cc, corpus callosum; poa, preoptic area; st, stria termin— alis; v, ventricle; vmh, ventromedial hypo- thalamus. 28 test. The priming dose of EB was increased to 0.17 ug for the second weekly test and 0.25 ug for the third weekly test. Approximately 4-5 hr before each test females were injected with either 0.5 mg progesterone or 0.1 ml sesame oil. During a test session, each female was pretested for lordosis and afterward bilaterally infused with either carbachol (0.5 ug/cannula) or CSF vehicle. The effects of intracerebral treatments on lordosis were tested 15, 45, and 90 min after infusion. Each female received the same combination of carbachol or CSF with progesterone or oil over the 3 wks of testing. RESULTS Significant increases in L0 were observed following preoptic infusion of carbachol (0.5 ug/cannula) under all hormone regimens (Figure 2). At the 0.13 ug dose of EB, analysis of variance revealed significant main effects of intracerebral treatment (p<<.001) and time after infu- sion (p <.001), as well as a significant treatment x time interaction (p <.001). Females primed with EB and oil displayed a higher incidence of lordosis 15 min (p< .05, Newman—Keuls test) and 45 min (p <.05) after carbachol infusion than after CSF infusion. Equivalent increases in L0 were observed 15 min (p.<.05) and 45 min (p<:.05) after carbachol infusion in females primed with EB and progesterone. The incidence of lordosis in both groups receiving carbachol returned to CSF levels by 90 min Figue 2. 29 Mean lordosis quotients recorded from female rats following bilateral infusion of carbachol (0.5 ug/cannula) or artificial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) vehicle into the medial preoptic area. Estradiol benzoate (EB) was injected intramuscularly 72, 48, and 24 hr before behavioral testing and the dose was increased each wk for all females. Oil (0.1 ml, upper panel) or progesterone (0.5 mg, lower panel) was injected intramuscularly -5 hr before testing. Each female received the same com— bination of carbachol or CSF with progesterone or oil over the 3 wk of testing. Intra- cerebral treatment was administered immedi— ately following the preinfusion test (PT). The effect of intracerebral treatment on lordosis was tested 15, 45, and 90 min after infusion. For each treatment combination, n = 10—14. *p <.05 (carbachol vs. CSF, Newman—Keuls). 3O o 0 W. . . 9 l..|. . 9 \\\\\ ‘ s~s \ * \ I g I... . .u M. l l .u . \ \e 5 \\\ 5 \\ .x. . \\ 2 \s 2 \\ . * \\ . |I1111 IA . H. 0 [I111 A .. :1. 0 I'll! — I!!! '11., I'll, 'I'll'll .III I T [I'll], vl P IA 1 P n I. o .- \ A I 9 \ I W \\\\ E \\\ E \ * \\\\\ 5 g S * \\\\ 5 g S |\\0 A ..4u0 m \l.\ A ..4uO \\ I 7 D m \\\ / 7 D \ \ * \\ m. a * \\\ MW. lle11 A . 5 lei IA . 5 [III .I .m F ll!!! ‘I B I'll! B a S II!!! E ' ' II III E c C II III I IIIIA I" + + 11 ... 1H 0 e e h n n C 0 .... ... m F e m S do A w a .s. lo. IA .. m c C \s e e .\ + + \\\ g g \\\ I .III * \\\ 5 g m m * \\\ 5 g .m o \n 4 h D D s.. IA . 4 u \ \ 3 \ \ \ 1 \ w A * \\\ _ 0. w A * .\\ / 1. I - I'll. ”a - I 1", IA I H o ' “ 'l'."' n """"' 'I I. h A 111111 T h A 11111 50 II T P 1 P -‘ . u . . u u - - . 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 6 4 2 o 8 6 4 2 l .l ...Zm:.ODO w_wODmO.._ Z_ hzw:.ODO w_wOQmO.. Zmcon whomon as :m ens .m: .Nm opdoaCop Howemupmo m: m.o Spas oopoomcfl one; moadSow HH<* m H mm m H mm a H om m m + mm m + om : + mm m Amasscmo\w: mv mussflcflaocofiEom CHE or Gas om Pmopohm : CHE om SHE om Pmopopm c N mmmg H MMMS *Ezmze<.05, ** p< .01; EB VS. oil, two-tailed Mann-Whitney U). 63 .moCdHhm> Ho mflmhawcm mHHnglaammeHm hp Umpdoawsfi mm mm Mo mmoc ham PM Umpowpww ego; wsflvcfln CH mmwsmso PSMOHMHQmHm oz .Pxop mnp CH anfipommv ohm hdmmd map Mo mHHumQ .EMm H sflopohg we 9mm UCZoQ mHHmOHMHoQO mPMHHNCwQ HhQHUHH05QHSd mm HoEw mm Ummmmhgxo opd mosaw>m .APCmEmehP 9mm Halo n Qv moaMHHowm whomwn p: :m 6cm .m: .Nm UomemHCHEUw mm; HHo ho mm H HmH H mmmH mmH H moom wmm H mowH mom H wmmH sweepzm mpdbsmO HNH H mmsH 90H H HHoH NNH H momH Nomm H osmH waHoo HapmHHmm m: 0H m: H ms mmH.o HHHo