_ .1 '1: 1' 44.4.1... . ‘1‘, 1. "' W 11,111.14? géflu... :5“; 14‘1", 13-”; . L31; W‘ffi ' 15'5"; .'1; an" ' . '1; . 111 ":11 h?” .- 1 1'1 ., .. f‘ .1111 X11311.r F61”? ”no. 7,17: l a": . -41 "ml" 1.14:1.11'1 .. "11.11141310111'111'a1‘ . 111 .1 ._1.. ... -44: . 4 '1. - : 1.: .111 1r -; 1 1 111"”, J11“) “'1‘. .- I 111’.‘ I ‘ "I _ {17134 .2:14 1n. '4 157. .1" 44 1}? 1111,1111, 11111" ' 1 1‘ .113 1 \1' A '11» 1, w" $101.1 .1 ‘R‘1‘1’J1‘P‘1112-1 “fl-R1115» ' -« a 11-111 d313,: VII! .111145)-.1 41" 1“. 1fl1-1 1 'I 1" . 1', . . 4 1. ‘1 c“ c— 41114444.... 311-311711141- Ja‘a;m1.:k$r‘:H pl .0- ~36“. Q1331; 1 CJ v.- 1‘- .1 1 1111 ll. ‘U‘—1' ()15' I 111 “I ' 1 1 . . 4, 1'1. 1 41 .. (111” 11‘ 4| ' . . 1 , 1‘ ~1- ' 1. 1 .111; 11 1.11111 4 L'I ‘ 1.1‘1111 'i‘ ‘1 1 1, 1 ‘ 4 ‘ '-4 11‘ $1.441. 13114-1 4114.11: ,1 1. 1.1 1 1 I, 111‘ ' .11 .' 1 ‘1'. l1. [4:111 ..' _ "'10. '1 1‘ 1 1 11 ‘ '1 1 "1:01" 1” '1' .1 ’ -. ~ '~ 1‘ -' .411,» .11. 11f?“ ' ”114‘.- * .11»; 1 1 4 914 1 ‘ 1“ - 1 4'. .1 1,...” 1, I '1 1; 11:. '1' ' ' 1" ,44-4114111111411'1 {‘11‘311‘141111’ . '. "1 '1: 1 ‘.1,,I .1 1 I: ‘ .1, 1:11 11 1| ".0 #:111,‘I 1:11 (11:11 1‘" {#14 1_ ,, “$1. 1" . kn“ .- 1 ' "-1 ' 1‘ ' . | | I ' 111.111 ’11. 11.1 ‘1 1'. '1 I {IVE-fri- H" 1.11 1‘; ~;."1«'.L:’:_ wk‘# 4. “J. J&( J d'fi“. 1".“ THESIS LIB KAI! 1’ Michigan State l University This is to certify that the dissertation entitled PROTOPLAST DEVELOPMENT, REGENERATION AND FUSION IN Brevibacterium lactofermentum presented by Susanne E. Keller has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for Ph.D. degree in EQQd Science JW ‘1pr Major professor James J. Pestka Date 7'22”“:- MS U i: an Affirmatiw Action/Equal Opportunity Institution 0- 12771 MSU LIBRARIES m RETURNING MATERIALS: Place in book drop to remove this checkout from your record. FINES will be charged if book is returned after the date stamped below. PROTOPLAST DEVELOPMENT, REGENERATION AND FUSION IN Brevibacterium lactofermentum By Susanne E. Keller A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition I985 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thanks to my major professor, James Pestka, for his continued support throughout this experience. My sincere appreciation to Harold Sadoff without whose advice and help I surely would have failed. Thanks also to the rest of my committee members, Robert Brubaker, J.R. Brunner, and Mark Uebersax, who have put up with me all this time. Last but not least, thanks to H. Momose whose initial guidance led me to this research. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES. LIST OF FIGURES INTRODUCTION. LITERATURE REVIEW Uses and Economic Importance of Brevibacterium. Classification and Taxonomy of Brevibacterium Protoplast Development and Fusion MATERIALS AND METHODS Strains . . Media Protoplast Formation. . Microsc0pic Observation of. Prot0plasts. Protoplast Fusion . . Radiolabeling of Cell Wall. RESULTS Prot0plast Formation. . . . Regeneration of Prot0plasts Variation in Mutants. Determination of Remaining Cell Wall and. Relationships to Regeneration Protoplast Fusion DISCUSSION. CONCLUSION. APPENDIX. . . Introduction and Literature Review. Methods Results Discussion. Conclusion. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Page iv vi LIST OF TABLES Table I ID Development of osmotic sensitivity in Brevi- bacterium lactofermentum and appearance of protoplasts. Effect of media on the development and regenera- tion of protoplasts. . . Effect of sucrose concentration of protoplast development and regeneration . . . . . Effect of bovine serum albumin on the regenera- tion of prot0plasts. Distribution of counts in each peak of hydrolyzed cell chromatograms. Comparison of two methods for protoplast fusion. Effect of temperature on fusion and recombina- tion frequency Effect of different molecular weight PEG on the fusion and recombination frequency . . . . Effect of length of PEG treatment on fusion and recombination frequency. . . . . . . Effect of protoplast development on fusion and recombination frequency. Appendix Table l Effect of NTG concentration on mutation frequency and cell viability in the membrane filter rotation method iv Page 29 34 35 41 49 52 53 55 56 57 75 Appendix Table 2 Induction of his+ reverse mutation in his'l6l using membrane filters and NTG containing plates. 3 Inactivation of residual NTG by placing membrane filters on pH 9 plate after NTG treatment 4 Effect of pH 9 treatment on cell viability. Page 76 78 8O LIST OF FIGURES Figure I 2 ID Development of protoplasts. Appearance of osmotic sensitivity during lyso- zyme treatment. . . . . . . . . Regeneration of protoplasts Regeneration of wild type and his’ mutant protoplasts vs depth of agar. % Osmotically insensitive cells remaining vs length of lysozyme treatment. % 3H in protoplasts vs % regeneration of protoplasts . . . . . . . . % 3H in protoplasts vs % whole cells remaining. Chromatograms of (3H) DAP heated with and without killed cells. . . . . . . . Chromatograms of hydrolysed cells labelled with (3H)DAP.................... Changes occurring over time during development of protoplast from (3H) DAP labelled cells. Appendix Figure 1 2 Effect of NAL on the growth of strain 2256. Increase in viable cells of strain 2256 after NAL treatment Effect of NTG concentration on mutation frequency and cell viability in the membrane filter rotation method. . . vi Page 3l 33 36 39 42 44 45 46 48 50 73 74 77 Appendix Figure Page 4 Variation in frequency of streptomycin resistant (A) and histidine reversion (8) mutations. . 81 5 Replication map of StrR and his+ loci in hisl6l.................... 82 vii INTRODUCTION Although microorganisms are currently known to produce hundreds of substances of commercial value, relatively few are produced for sale (Eucheigh, 198l). This is due primarily to the lower cost and higher yield of chemical synthesis as compared to biological fermentation. In microorganisms, biological pathways to the production of various industrial chemicals are often subject to strict control mechanisms which prevent their overproduction in the wild type. Production, therefore, depends upon the ability to overcome these controls either by often costly chemical manipulations or the development of such mutants lacking such control mechanisms. Traditionally, the devel0pment of mutants was dependent of the screening of enormous numbers of artificially created mutants, a tech- nique that was at best slow and laborious. With the advent of new genetic methods such as recombinant-DNA techniques, direct manipulation of biological pathways within micro- organisms becomes a possibility. The creation of such new microorganisms makes fermentation of various economically important substances a very attractive proposition. However, the creation of new industrially useful strains of microorganisms requires that basic research provide us with the knowledge necessary to take advantage of new genetic methods. For example, in both E. coll and g. subtilis, various methods of genetic transfer are well established. A genetic map and various methods of mapping of the genomes of these organisms is also readily available. This information is vital to the success of newer methods of genetic engineering. Unfortunately, this is not the case with all industrially important microorganisms. One such genus of industrial importance for which these methods have not been well established is Brevibacterium. It was the purpose of this work to establish a reliable method of genetic transfer and a genetic map of Brevibacterium, using g. lactofermentum as the model strain. The uses and economic importance of the genus Brevi- bacterium are wide and varied. Expansion of its use and improvement of strains for commercial use would be of considerable economic interest. As mentioned such develop- ment currently depends on traditional development and screening of enormous numbers of mutants. Reliable methods for genetic transfer and genetic mapping of this species would enhance genetic improvement of these industrially important strains of Brevibacterium. LITERATURE REVIEW Uses and Economic Importance of Brevibacterium One bacterial genus of considerable industrial impor- tance is Brevibacterium. For example, D. flavum is one organism used commercially to produce glutamic acid or monosodium glutamate (MSG) for use as a flavoring agent. Approximately 300,000 tons of MSG are produced per year. This represents sales of l,O8O million dollars per year (Eucleigh, l98l). A number of other species of Brevi- bacterium are also considered glutamic acid producers. These species include a. divaricatum, D. aminogenes, g. lactofermentum, D. saccharolyticum, D. roseum, D. ammonia- gens, D. alamicum, and D. thiogentitalis (Abe and Takayama, 1972). In addition to the more traditional approach used to produce MSG by g. flavum, a novel method using temperature- sensitive mutants of D. lactofermentum was developed by Momose and Takagi (1978). Normally, glutamate production by Brevibacterium requires that the media be biotin deficient or that penicillin or surface active agents such as Tween 60 are added to the media. The mutant developed by Momose and Takagi (I978) was found to produce glutamic acid in biotin-rich media without the presence of peni- cillin or surface active agents when the temperature was raised from permissive (30°) to non-permissive (37°). Along with glutamic acid, 8. flavum can be manipulated to produce lysine, an essential amino acid. Currently 8 % of lysine is produced by fermentation (Eucleigh, I981). Other amino acids which have been reported to be produced by various members of the genus Brevibacterium include alanine, valine, homoserine, o-ethylhomoserine, o-propyl- homoserine, phenylalanine, threonine, proline, tyrosine, aspartate, histidine, serine, isoleucine, and Ieucine (Abe and Takayama, I972; Ikeda et al., I976; Nakamori and Isamu, I970; Shiio et al., I982; Tsuchidu et al., l975a; Tsuchidu et al., I975b; Yoshinaga, I969). Although not all these are economically viable fermentations, the variety serves to illustrate the point that, with new genetic techniques, the industrial fermentation of any amino acid by Brevi- bacterium may be possible in the near future. In addition to the production of amino acids, this genus is important in the production of nucleotides and nucleotide-related products such as 5'-inosinic acid (Nara et al., I969; Sato and Furuya, I977; Teshiba and Furuya, I982). Inosinic acid is an important flavor- enhancing agent of foods and of considerable economic significance. The species used in its production is 8. ammoniagenes. Coenzyme A is also produced via biological fermentation utilizing 8. ammoniagenes (Asada et al., I982; Shimizu et al., I979). Another important use of Brevibacterium in the food industry is the production of various cheeses (Rose, l98l). 8. linens in mixed cultures usually with Streptococcus lactis and S. cremoris is involved in the production of limburger, brick, muenster, trappist, port and duSalut cheeses (Rose, l98l; Schmidt et al., I976). Its primary role appears to be in flavor deveIOpment. Uses of Brevibacterium discussed to this point have centered on those already of considerable economic impor- tance. A survey of literature involving Brevibacterium indicates other possible roles for this genus, including biodegradation of herbicides (Horvath, l97l; Rott et al., I979). Some aid the metabolism of hydrocarbons (Atlas and Bartha, I972; Pirnik et al., I979). This latter ability may make them important in biodegradation of hazardous pollutants. Another possible use of Brevibacterium, the production of feed protein from mesquite wood, has been investigated by Fu and Thayer (I975). Mesquite wood itself is not useful as feed and its conversion to protein would render those areas where only mesquite wood grows as economically productive. One final use for Brevibacterium may be in the isolation and use of novel endonucleases for use in characterization of DNA or in recombinant DNA work. A few such nucleases have already been characterized (Basnak'yan et al., I98I; Gerlinas et al., I977). Classification and Taxonomy of Brevibacterium Brevibacterium as a group is rather complex and hetero- genous. In the 8th edition of Bergey's Manual it is placed within the coryneform group of bacteria Genera incertae sedis. Attempts to clarify the position of Brevibacterium have been made by numerous methods using different criteria (Bergey & Manual, 8th Ed., I974; Collins et al., I979; Crombach, I97I; Jones, I975; Keddie and Cure, I979; Komagata et al., I969; Stackebrandt and Fiedler, I975; Seiler, I983; Yamada et al., I976; Yamada and Komagatu, I970) and with variable success. No attempt will be made here to reclassify or clarify the taxonomy of Brevibacterium. However, certain characteristics examined by researchers and unique to this group will be discussed. General characteristics of Brevibacterium are similar to those of Corynebacterium and Arthrobacter. They have considerable morphological diversity but typically appear as short, aerobic, non-sporulating, gram-positive rods (Bergey's Manual, 8th Ed., I974). Yamada and Komagata (I970)attempted to characterize Brevibacterium as well as the other related groups of coryneform bacteria on the basis of type of cell division, cell wall amino acid content and DNA base composition. None of the factors discussed could be utilized to distinguish Brevibacterium from other coryneform bacteria. GC content was found to vary con- siderably (46.6-70.5). This is supported by latter studies done by Pitcher (I983). Cell wall content varied but remained consistent with variation found in Corynebacterium and Arthrobacter. It is interesting to note that glutamic acid producers, regardless of genus, had a narrow range of GC content, similar cell wall amino acid content, and a single mode of division. Examinations by Keddie and Cure (I979) of cell wall composition of coryneform bacteria also found wide diversity in Brevibacterium in general. However, glutamic acid producers, regardless of genus, appeared similar. Such strains all contained DL-DAP along with the sugars, arabinose and galactose. Thus these glutamic acid producing strains among different genera would seem, there- fore, to be more related to each other than individual strains within the grouping Brevibacterium. Other researchers have attempted to use the unusual menaquinones found in coryneform bacteria as a classification method (Collins et al., I979; Yamada et al., I976). Cory- neform bacteria were found to contain the same type of menaquinone, referred to as MK-9 (H2). Because this is the same type found in Corynebacterium bovis and also on the basis of similar mycolic acids within glutamic acid producers and true corynebacteria, Collins et aI. (I979) recommended the transfer of all glutamic acid-producing strains they tested to Corynebacterium-sensu stricto. These researchers also point out that their data support the hypothesis that glutamic acid producers should in fact be reduced to synonymy with C. glutamicum. This hypothesis is further SUPported by the numerical taxonomic studies of Seiler (I983). One method to resolve the difficulty in classifi- cation of Brevibacterium within Corynebacterium may be found in DNA-DNA or DNA-RNA homology studies. Such studies could provide more conclusive evidence on the relationship of the various genus and species to each other. Stackebrant and Fiedler (I975) have done one such study. Since, the number of organisms used within corynebacteria in general and specifically Brevibacterium are very small and of little use in classification, additional work in this area would be beneficial. Protoplast Development and Fusion Transformation, transduction, or conjugation have never been reported for Brevibacterium. However, protoplast fusion has been reported for 8. flavus, 8. lactofermentum and g. glutamicum, and therefore, holds promise as a method of genetic exchange (Ajinomoto Co., I983a, l9836). Optimal conditions have not yet been well established. Protoplast fusion has been used for genetic studies in a large number of organisms (Ferenezy, I98l; Hopwood, l98l). With the advent of the use of PEG as a fusogen by Koa and co-workers with plant protoplasts, various procedures for fusion have been deveIOped for both procaryotes and eucaryotes (Baltz, I978; Fodor and Alfold, I979; Hales, I977; Kao and Michayluk, I969; Kao et al., I974; Ponte- corvo, I975; Schaeffer et al., I976). Proper use of prot0plast fusion as a genetic technique depends upon the ability to develop and revert protoplasts. The method used depends upon the type of organism in question. Within the gram-positive procaryotes such as 8. subtilus, 8. lichen- formis, and 8. megaterium, which have been extensively studied, a simple lysozyme treatment was sufficient to produce protoplasts (Bugaichuk et al., I98l; Fodor and Alfoldi, I976; Schaeffer et al., I976; Wyrick and Rogers, I973). In the case of 8. brevis, achromopeptidase was used successfully to produce protoplasts. Resistence to lysozyme of this 8. brevis strain was attributed to a thick protein layer on the cell surface (Nimi et al., I983). Other gram-positive organisms such as Mycobacterium, Brevibacterium, Streptgmyces and Streptococcus are also resistant to treat- ment with lysozyme. In the case of Mycobacterium and Streptomyces, protoplasts have been obtained by first treating the cells with glycine in growth medium (Baltz, I978; Hopwood, I98l; Udou et al., I982). The glycine is believed to replace alanine in the peptidoglycan, thereby interfering with crosslinking. Cells treated in this manner become more sensitive to lysozyme. Lysozyme and a amylase were used together to obtain protoplasts of Streptococcus IO lactis (Okamoto et al., I983). Prot0plasts have been obtained in lysozyme-resistant Brevibacterium and Coryne- bacterium by treating with penicillin in combination with lysozyme either in a sequential manner or simultaneously (Kaneko and Sakeguchi, I979; Shtannikov et al., I98l; Rytir et al., I982). Most gram-negative bacteria peptido- glycan is sensitive to lysozyme (Schaitman, l98l). However, the peptidoglycan is surrounded by a lysozyme-impermeable outer membrane, which must first be destroyed before the lysozyme can act. Digestion of the peptidoglycan does not result in the removal of this outer membrane. Therefore, such osmoticalIy-sensitive structures are more appropriately termed spheroplasts. Removal of the outer membrane to produce true protoplasts is an important and probably essential step if fusion is to occur. In gram-negative bacteria such as 8. £911, a procedure has been developed involving lysozyme treatment and EDTA that will produce true protoplasts (Weiss, I976). Spheroplasts with about l5% of exposed cytoplasmic membrane of Providence alcali- faciens were produced using a combined glycine and lysozyme EDTA treatment (Cortzec et al., I979). These were success- fully utilized in subsequent fusion experiments. Conditions forregeneration of prot0plasts appear to be far more complex than for their development and may vary even in closely related species (Hopwood, l98l). Results of Fodor and Alfoldi (I979) emphasize that various II physiological factors can greatly affect regeneration rates. They claim complete distortion of genetic information derived from their fused phenotypes due to variable regenera- tion of the parental mutant types. Gabor and Hotchkiss (I982) also noted physiological factors such as crowding on plates played an important role in regeneration of fused protoplasts, thus supporting observations of Fodor and Alfoldi. In an earlier study by Landman et al. (I968) crowding was found to delay reversion markedly. In studies with Streptomyces by Baltz and Mutsushima (l98l), both the temperature of cell growth prior to protoplast development and the temperature during regeneration were found to effect regeneration rates. The optimum growth temperatures required for good regeneration varied from species to species and was not necessarily the same as that temperature optimum required during regeneration. In addition dehydration of regeneration plates and plating by using a soft agar overlay was said to result in a more rapid, synchronous and efficient regeneration. As a result auto-inhibition exhibited by some species was overcome. Using optimal conditions for strains tested nearly IOO% regeneration was achieved. Careful examination of parameters for the genera- tion of Bacillus subtilus have resulted in improvements to the established hypertonic media that can obtain up to IOO% regeneration rates (Gabor and Hotchkiss, I979). The primary factor responsible for this high rate was the I2 addition of I% bovine serum albumin (BSA) to the growth and dilution media. Unfortunately regeneration did drop to ID to 75% after treatment with PEG. BSA was also reported to enhance regeneration of Staphylococci. However, the use of BSA in the regeneration media precludes the direct selection of recombinants. Akamatsu and Sekiguchi (I984) developed a method of regeneration of Bacillus species protoplasts using a preincubation with 3% polyvinylpyrollidone. No appreciable growth of auxotrophs was obtained whereas regeneration frequencies increased SOD-fold in some cases. In addition, a 20 fold increase in regeneration rates was obtained when an agar overlay method was used as opposed to spread plates. Lower agar concentrations also resulted in increased regeneration frequencies. Another interesting observation made by Akamatsu and Sekiguchi (I984) was that regenerating protoplasts increased in size first then underwent a non-oriented division. In regenerant colonies which had been plated using an overlay method, cells were in the bacillary form in 3 or 4 days. When the protoplasts were plated using a spread plate method the majority stopped growing after a few divisions. Akamatsu and Sekiguchi (I984) hypothesized that the newly synthesized cell wall components at high concentrations around the protoplasts might be an important factor for their regeneration. I3 Past studies also indicate a possible role of cell wall components in the regeneration of protoplasts. Differences in the envelope structure of three different L-forms of Proteus mirabilis were examined by Demonty et al. (I973). An incomplete cell wall about 8 mm thick outside the plasma membrane was observed in two unstable L-forms whereas the stable L-form was enveloped only by the plasma membrane. The remaining cell wall of the unstable L-forms was believed to be made up largely of Iipopolysaccharides. Peptidoglycan content did not correlate to the unstability of the various L-forms. Reversion of Bacillus subtilis was stimulated by the presence of cell wall extractions and a variety of autoclaved intact microorganisms (Landman and Forman, 2+ + . . . and K 1ons were requ1red for revers1on. I969). Mg Prot0plasts were said to enlarge but not divide in liquid medium and reversion was stimulated with gelatin or hard agar. Reversion was studied via the use of various antibiotics blocking DNA, RNA, protein, and cell wall synthesis in order to determine if and when these events were required. Reversion was broken down into three steps. It was speculated that the first step involved an alteration of the membrane, the second step, the depression of DAP and mucopeptide wall synthesis, and the last step, teichoic acid synthesis. The physical immobilization of excreted cell products at the protOpIast surface early in I4 step two was also believed to be important. Conditions for regeneration of Brevibacterium have been examined. Best reversion rates when succinate is used as to osmotic stabilizer (as opposed to sucrose) and when the protoplasts are imbedded in the top of a semisoft 0.8% agar layer (Shtannikov et al., l98l). Enrichment with casein hydrolysate or amino acids and nitrogen bases also increased reversion with reported reversion rates being 20 to 70%. The results correspond fairly well to those in an earlier work by Kaneko and Sakaguchi (I979) where a 30% regeneration rate was reported under similar conditions of regeneration. No other variables that might affect regeneration of Brevibacterium protoplasts were investigated. As mentioned earlier, fusion of protoplasts have been accomplished with both procaryotes and eucaryotes. Fusion has not been limited to fusion of protoplasts of the same species, but can be made to occur with different species and genus (Cocking et al., I98l; Ferenzy, l98l; Hales, I977; Hopwood, I98l; Shepard et al., I983). Interspecific protoplast fusion has been reported more often for eucary- otes than for procaryotes. Presumably, this does not stem from the inability to achieve interspecific protoplast fusion but rather simply that few have tried it. Hopwood (I98l) reports attempts at interspecific fusion with Streptomyces and concludes that although such recombinants [rm—r-.-sx I5 occur, they occur at very low frequency and are not very stable. Shtannikov et al. (l98l) report that fusion does occur between Corynebacterium glutamicum and Brevibacterium flavum. However, it should be noted that these two genus are so closely related that some researchers indicate they are in fact the same. Interspecific fusion has also been reported for Bacillus species (Akamatsu and Sekiguchi, I983). Numerous examples of intraspecies fusion occur in the literature and have been reviewed in some detail (Ferenezy, l98l; Hopwood, l98l; Pebery, I980). Fusion itself is thought to occur in distinct phases LIT”? fiffimic -..-.- at- .|.=. E (Ahkong et al., I975; Frehel et al., I979; Gumpert, I980; Knutton and Pasternak, I979). The model proposed by Gumpert (I980), which also encompassed those proposed by others, specifies five steps. The first is the formation of a contact zone. Presumably, this is promoted by fusogens such as polyethylene glycol (PEG). PEG is said to promote aggregation of the protoplasts (Tilcock and Fisher, I982). The second step is the establishment of molecular contacts and alteration of membrane structures. Changes in the bilayer phase of membrane lipids have been reported by Cullis and Hope (I978 and l98l) using 3IP-NMR techniques. This alteration of the membrane includes increased fluidity of the phospholipids and lateral diffusion of intrinsic proteins which may be promoted by the action of both PEG and Ca2+ (Tilcock and Fisher, I979). PEG has been shown to I6 cause changes in phospholipid hydration and polarity which may account for these alterations (Arnold et al., I983). In particular, it may be the removal of water associated with the bilayer that is the principle destabilizing effect which results in fusion (Gibson and Strauss, I984). The third step is the formation of a fusion membrane and the fourth the formation of a separation layer by membrane material. The final step is the migration of lipid vesicles and intermixing of cell contents. Sucess of fusion may depend in part on the partial removal of the PEG (Ferenezy, I98l; Wojcieszyn et EH ., I983). Some controversy does exist on the ability of PEG by itself to cause fusion. Honda et al. (l98la) reported that purified PEG mw 6000 was unable to cause cell fusion. They concluded that the commercial grade PEG contained at least two components, one which caused aggregation and one which resulted in the perturbation of the phospholipid bilayer. Honda et al. (l98lb) later identified the components removed during PEG purification as antioxidants like a-toc0pherol or other phenolic derivatives which are often added to commercial PEG. Fusion activity could be restored to the purified PEG when such components were added. These results were supported by the work of Wojcieszyn et al. (I983). In contrast, Smith et al. (I982) reported that four out of five commercial preparations of PEG retained fusogenic activity I7 upon purification. Although the addition of small quan- tities of compounds of the type utilized by Honda et al. (l98lb) was observed to enhance cell fusion up to 5 %. PEG is now used almost exclusively to facilitate fusion. Factors investigated included pH, concentration of Ca2+, molecular weight of the PEG, time and temperature of treat- ment. Generally speaking, more concentrated solutions of 50% PEG (wt/vol) are more effective than dilute solutions. For fusion of mammalian cells, PEG mw 6000 have been used (Pontecorvo, I975). In later procedures, DMSO was added to enhance fusion by 4l.7% (wt/vol) PEGat mw HEM (Hales, I977). For fusion of various Streptomyces, PEG from IOOO to 6000 has been used with and without the addition of DMSO. PEG was generally in the range of 36 to 50% (Akamatsu and Sekiguchi, I983; Hopwood and Wright, I978; Hopwood and Wright, l98l; Ochi et al., I979; Rose, l98l). In fusion experiments with Bacillus species, PEG 6000 is most often used (Fodor and Alfoldi, I976; Fodor and Alfoldi, I979; Frehel et al., I979; Horvath, l97l; Schaeffer et al., I976). With Brevibacterium, PEG 6000 was also used at 33% by Kaneko and Sakaguchi (I979) and at 40% by Shtannikov et al. (l98l). Fusion by Shtannikov et al. (l98l) was done at room temperature, whereas Kaneko and Sakaguchi (I979) used 30°C. The possible effect of different temperatures was not investigated by either group. Kaneko and Sakaguchi (l98l) report that pH did not much effect the fusion I8 mixture. The range that they tested is not given. Shtannikov et al. (I98l) did not vary pH conditions. Kaneko and Sakaguchi (I979) did test exposure time to PEG and report no effect on fusion frequency over a l to 5 minute period. Neither group investigated the possible 2+ influence of Ca on the fusion of Brevibacterium. Controls utilizing DNase to assure that genetic transfer was indeed due to protoplast fusion as opposed to DNA uptake are not mentioned. A requirement for Ca2+ has been noted by groups working with fungi, but it has not been well investigated in fusion with bacteria (Ferenezy, I98l; Peberdy, I980). Ca2+ has been shown to be involved with the fusion of artificial membranes in a number of studies (Ingolia and Koshland, I978; Ito and Ohnishi, I974; Papahadiopoulos et al., I974; Papahadiopoulos et al., I976; Sun et al., I979). The mechanism of action of the Ca2+ is thought to be by causing phase separation or disturbances in the lipid molecules. This could result in the formation of small bridges when cells come into contact, which then enlarge for fusion. It should be pointed out at this time that fusion does not by itself ensure genetic exchange. Recombination is a separate event. Frehel et al. (I979) placed emphasis on an optimal post-PEG incubation period. The method of selection of recombinants may exert a strong influence on recombinant genotypes recovered. Generally, both direct and indirect I9 screening methods have been used. Fodor and Alfoldi (I979) used a direct method, screening on the basis of nutritional requirements. As mentioned previously, this led to con- siderable bias in the recovery of the recombinants. Under the circumstances, an indirect method might produce better results. With Brevibacterium, direct selection for antibiotic markers has been utilized (Kaneko and Sakaguchi, I979; Shtannikou et al., l98l). Recombinants are selected on the basis of rifampsin and streptomycin-resistance markers obtained from each parental type, then classified on the basis of a non-selected auxotrophic marker. Presumably, this could avoid physiological bias introduced by variable nutrient content in the regeneration media as utilized by Fodor and Alfoldi (I979). In the literature, there are a few notable novel approaches to selection of recombinants. These involve the selection of one or both the parental protoplasts so that only the resulting recombinant progeny will grow. One method by Hopwood and Wright (I98l) involves the use of ultraviolet irradiated protoplasts. The ultraviolet radiation presumably leaves the protoplast intact but nonviable unless fused with another protoplast not carrying the same defect. This is the same reasoning used by Wright (I978). Here cells were given lethal doses of a specific reagent or inhibitor, which selectively damages a specific 20 molecule. The two parental types are then fused and only those recombinants receiving a full set of undamaged mole- cules can survive, thus eliminating the need for selectable markers. The fusion of nonviable parental organisms gives rise to another method of genetic transfer involving the fusion of protoplasts with phospholipid vesicles containing genetic information. Such a method has been developed by Fraley 2 et al. (I979). In this study liposomes containing pBR322 DNA were fused with 8. coli. Such a procedure could be adapted for use with other microorganisms. In addition to fusion of whole protoplasts and of liposomes with protoplasts, a great deal of success has been achieved with the transformation of protoplasts with DNA (Akamatsu and Sekiguchi, I982; McDonald and Burke, I984; Kondo and McKay, I982). The procedures used are generally similar to those used for protoplast fusions. Protoplast fusion and transformation have become increasingly important as a means to improve strains of organisms for which no other genetic exchange system exists. There are presently numerous examples in the literature where these methods are now being applied to improve or enhance various properties of organisms with no other exchange system. A second purpose for the development of such systems is to develop a functional map of the bacterial chromosome. One notable effort has been made in this 21 direction by Stahl and Pattee (I983a, I983b). Location of various markers was first done using protoplast fusion. Calculation of frequencies of recombinants and possible linkages of markers was done directly by entering results of 9 and ID factor crosses into a computer. Results were then confirmed by transformation of competent cells of Staphylococcus aureus. In summary, protoplast fusion has been utilized for the exchange of genes and the mapping of the chromosome in a variety of organisms. Because other avenues of genetic exchange do not appear to exist for Brevibacterium lacto- fermentum, protoplast fusion could fill this void. In addition, protoplast fusion can provide a method of mapping for Brevibacterium lactofermentum. As such protoplast fusion could provide a convenient method for strain improve- ment via the genetic manipulation of this microorganism. MATERIALS AND METHODS Strains Brevibacterium lactofermentum strain 2256 was kindly _..€-n.iI supplied by Dr. H. Momose, Central Research Laboratories, Ajinomoto Co., Japan. Mutants derived from this strain were obtained by N—methyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoquanidine (NTG) R fgfialfi‘fl mutagenesis. Str strains were resistant to lOO pg/ml streptomycin. RifR strains were resistant to IO ug/ml rifampsin. Media Complex media (CM) was that used by Momose and Takagi (I978) and had the following composition per liter: yeast extract, l0.0 9; glucose, 5.0 9; NaCl, 5.0 g; and poly- peptone, I0.0 g at pH 7.0. Minimal media (MM) per liter composition was: glucose, 20.0 g; (NH4)ZSO4, I0.0 g; urea, 2.5 g; KH2P04, l.0 g; MgSO4°7H20, 0.4 g; biotin, 50.0 pg; thiamin-HCI, 200 pg; NaCl, 50.0 mg; FeSO4-7H20, l0.0 mg; at pH 7.0. Plates of CM or MM media contained 2% agar. Amino acids were added to a final concentration of 0.0I% as required by the particular aurotrophic strain. Selective plates for selection of recombinants were CM with l00 ug/ml 22 23 streptomycin and ID pg/ml rifampsin or MM with I00 pg/ml streptomycin and I0 ug/ml rifampsin and appropriate amino acid(s) at a final concentration of 0.0l%. Buffer for the dilution of protoplasts was a modification of sucrose- maleate (SMM) buffer used by Wyrick and Rogers (I973). It contained 0.4l M sucrose, 20 mM maleate and 0.2M M9504 at pH 6.5. All other dilutions were carried out using 0.I M potassium phosphate buffer at pH 7.0. Lysozyme treatment solutions were either MM with ID mg/ml lysozyme, 0.2 u/ml penicillin and 0.4I M sucrose or a modification of that used by Chang and Cohen (I979) which consisted of SMM plus 35 g/l Difco pennassay media (SMMP) with ID mg/ml lysozyme, 0.3 u/ml penicillin, and 0.4l M sucrose. Filter sterilized BSA, O.I% (w/v) final concentration was added to stabilize protoplasts. Lysozyme solutions were made fresh prior to each use and filter sterilized. Two types of regeneration media were used. Minimal regeneration media was MM with l35 g/l Na succinate. Complex regeneration media (CR) was a modification of that utilized by Wyrick and Rogers (I973) with a per liter composition as follows: Tris, l2.0 g; KCl, 0.5 9; glucose, I0.0 g; MgCI2°6H20, 8.I g; CaCl2-2H20, 2.2 9; (group A), Naz succinate, I35 9; (group B), peptone, 4.0 g; yeast extract 4.0 g; casamino acid, l.O g; K2PO4, 0.2 9; (group C). Agar, 0.45% final concentration, was added to group A. Each group was brought to pH 7.0 and autoclaved separately, group A and B at ll5°C and group C 24 at l200C. Once again, BSA at 0.I% final concentration was added to stabilize protoplasts. Protgplast Formation Development of protonlast procedure was modified from those utilized by Kaneko and Sakaguchi (I979) and Shtannikov et al. (I98l). An overnight culture grown in either MM or CM was inoculated into the same type media to an initial 00(575) of 0.150 - 0.200 and incubated on a shaker at 3200 until an 00(575) of approximately 0.600 was reached. This 00 corresponds to about IO8 cells/ml. Fresh filter sterilized penicillin was added to give a final concentration of 0.3 u/ml. Cells were cultivated for one more generation period (l.5 - 2.0 hrs), then washed one time with SMM buffer, resuspended in one of the lysozyme solutions and incubated without shaking at 320C overnight. Rate of protoplast development was determined by taking samples from lysozyme solution at various intervals and diluting with potassium phosphate buffer to lyse all osmotically sensitive cells. Samples were then plated on CM to deter- mine the number of osmotically insensitive cells remaining. Reversion of Prot0plasts To revert protoplasts, lysozyme treated cells were washed one time with SMM plus BSA and resuspended in a volume of SMM equal to the starting volume. The sample was then diluted appropriately in SMM plus BSA and plated in ID mls 25 of regeneration media plus BSA. Plates were incubated upright at 320C for up to 2 weeks to ensure all prot0plasts capable of reversion had grown. This number represented regenerated protoplasts plus any remaining osmotically insensitive cells. To obtain % regeneration, this total was corrected for the number of cells remaining osmotically insensitive as was the initial number prior to lysozyme treatment. % regeneration = (ggg) x IOO where “ a = p0pulation from regeneration plates {A b = population from "whole cell“ plates "' c = initial population The number of reverted protoplasts was then divided by the corrected initial number, and multiplied by lOO to give the % regeneration. Microsc0pic Observation of Prot0plasts Protoplast development was monitored on a phase micro- scope. Direct cell and protoplast counts were done with a Petrof—Hauser counting chamber. Protoplast reversion was observed by taking samples at various time intervals from the soft agar regeneration media plates, placing on a slide and covering with a cover slip. Protoplast Fusion Prot0plasts of two strains, Met'rifR and Arg’strR, R or Thr'rifR and Arg'str were mixed (I ml each type) and 26 centrifuged. They were then resuspended in one-tenth the volume of SMMP at 37°C. Two mls of polyethylene glycol (PEG mw 6000, MCB, 33% w/v in SMM without MgCl) and filter sterilized) prewarmed to 37°C was added and rapidly mixed with the protoplasts. The solution was then incubated 30 mins at 370C. After incubation, 8 mls of SMMP was added to the PEG - protoplast suspension. Prot0plasts were then centrifuged and resuspended in 2 mls of SMMP. The fused protoplasts were then plated for nonselective regeneration by plating l ml per plate of IO mls regeneration media. These plates were incubated 3 days at 32°C. After 3 days, IO mls phosphate buffer (0.I M, pH 7.0) was added to each plate and homogenized with the agar by quickly drawing the suspension up and down a l0 ml pipet. Once homogenized, the sample was diluted appropriately and spread plated on CM plates to determine the population of regenerated cells and on selective media to determine fusion and recombination. Controls were run in exactly the same manner except 2 mls of only one type mutant was used per fusion. To determine if protoplasts were transformed as well as fused, DNase I (Sigma) was added to the prot0plast mixture at a final concentration of IO mg/ml prior to and during PEG treatment in some experiments. Radiolabeling of Cell Wall Cells were grown overnight in MM plus 0.0l% lysine and transferred to fresh MM plus 0.0l% lysine plus IOO pI of 27 of 3H—DL-mesodiaminopimelic acid (Research Products Inter- national Corp., Mt. Prospect, Illinois, 2 pCi/ul 32 pCi/mMol) at a starting 00(575) of .2. Cells were then cultivated and protoplasted as before. One ml samples were taken prior to lysozyme treatment and at various time intervals during lysozyme treatment. Controls were treated in exactly the same manner except lysozyme was left out of the lysozyme solution. Samples were centrifuged and washed 2 times with SMM and resuspended in l N HCl. 0.5 mls of each sample (duplicates) were placed in Iypholyzation vials, flushed with N2, and sealed. The sealed vials were heated at IIOOC overnight. Ten pl of each hydrolysed sample was counted directly in a 20 ml glass vial with IS mls of aqueous scintillation cocktail (RPI Safety solve). Fifty pl of each hydrolysed sample was chromatogramed on thin layer cellulose plates. The solvent system used was methanol: H20:pyridine:l2NHCl (l00:35:20:5). Each chromatogram was cut into 0.5 x l.0 inch fractions. The cellulose was scraped off each fraction and placed into a 20 ml glass vial with IS mls of nonaqueous scintillation cocktail (RPI 3a20). These samples were left overnight in the dark at room temperature prior to counting. Amino acid standards were run with the same solvent system and sprayed with % ninhydrin in acetone and heated briefly to visualize their locations. DAP was identified by its characteristic green spot. RESULTS Protoplast Formation Logarithmically growing wild type cells of 8. lacto- fermentum were subjected to variable concentrations of penicillin pretreatment and lysozyme-penicillin treatment in order to determine optimal conditions for the deveIOp— ment of protoplasts (Table I). When treated with lysozyme only, osmotic sensitivity increased with increasing amounts of lysozyme. However, microscopic examination indicated poor (<25%) protoplast development at all concentrations of lysozyme used. When penicillin was added to the procedure, the proportion of protoplasts increased with increasing amount of penicillin used. Penicillin at concentrations $0.3 units/IO8 cells did not inhibit growth. Attempts to replace penicillin treatment with 2% glycine gave the same results as treatment with lysozyme only, regardless of the length of preincubation in media with 2% glycine. Attempts to use stationary phase cells grown overnight in penicillin resulted in greater than 99% of the population sensitive to osmotic shock but only approximately 50% appeared to be free protoplasts under microscopic observation. Utilizing 0.3 units/ml penicillin and ID mg/ml lysozyme at a starting population of IO8 cells/ml, protoplast 28 29 .3mkx n +++ .xmm-mm u ++ .3mmv u + “xmx .cowpm>cmmno owaoumocuwe >3 cmcwsempmv mm3 “cmanpm>mv ammFgouoeau .ZU co mewmeQ new ewmmzn mpmcqmo;a >3 umcwecmpmu mm3 newsmemL mFqu epocza o— uzonm mm3 uemsummcw mexNomxp mo pcmam mcu pm cowumngoa Frmu .pcmsummcu wexNOmzp w uzocozocgu um::_peoo use ucmsgmmcp mEANOmxp op Lowcn meson N gamma mm3 gemEpmmcp cwppwuwcma .meso; om cow 822m aw mexNomzr spw3 umummcu ecu :2 :3 :3ocm wcm3 mppmum ._E\ +++ o_o.o ++ 030.0 ++ 030.0 + m—o.o or +++ F_o.o ++ «30.0 ++ mmo.o + ow.o m ++ mm.o + No.0 + F.N + mm F acme mew pews mew upcme mew ugcws mew -mo_m>we -cmemc Imopw>mc -evesmc Iaopw>mn -cwmemc -QoPm>mu -cmemc ummpu mppmu “more mprmu pmmpa mPqu ummpa mFqu A \m V .0 egg m o 3 a .0 can 6 o 3 o .0 038 m o 3 w .0 one u o 3 a PE E u a F c \ u a P g a p a P g \ p n F g \ msx~omxp a m.o N.O ~.O O cowumchmucou APE\mpw::V :TFFeuwcma mo cowumcucmucoo m.mumm_a0poca mo mocmcmmaqm use EzpcmEcmmopump Ezwcmuumnw>mem cw 3u_>wuwmcmm uwuoEmo mo pewsao~m>mo .F mpnee 30 development appeared nearly complete in 3-4 hours (Figure l). Osmotic sensitivity showed greatest increases in the first few hours and at 4 hours only approximately 0.I% of the starting population remained osmotically insensitive (Figure 2). A decrease in 00(575) paralleled development of protoplasts (Figure 2 inset). The effects of growth media (CM vs MM) and lysozyme treatment medium on the protoplast development were examined (Table 2). MM resulted in substantially fewer cells (l0 times) remaining osmotically insensitive than did CM. However, the media used during lysozyme treatment did not appear to have a marked effect on protoplast devel0pment. Sucrose concentration has been reported to have an effect on protoplast development (Kaneko and Sakaguchi, I979). Two different concentrations were used in this study to determine the optimal one (Table 3). No difference in the development of protoplasts was detected regardless of the media used to cultivate the cells. However, a slight advantage was detected in the regeneration when 0.4l M sucrose was used as opposed to .5 M sucrose. Regeneration of Prot0plasts Prot0plasts were plated in CR and examined microsc0pi- cally after 48 hours of incubation. Two types of patterns were detected (Figure 3). The first was a large swollen protoplast-like form with few protrusions that appeared to be regenerated cells. The second was smaller more numerous 3I Figure l. Development of prot0plasts. A. Normal cells of Brevibacterium lactofermentum; B. After 3 hours in lysozyme solution; C. After l6 hours in lysozyme solution. The bar represents l0 um. 33 Q. ".52 Colony Forming Units/ ml Hours Figure 2. Appearance of osmotic sensitivity during lysozyme treatment. Population of Whole cells remaining was determined by dilution in phosphate buffer and plating on CM. Inset: change in 00(570) during lysozyme treatment. 34 Table 2. Effect of media on the development and regeneration of prot0plastsa Growth Lysozyme Regeneration % Whole % Regeneration Media Treatment Media Cells Media Remaining CM SMP CR 1.5x10-I 1.2 CM SMP MM 1.5x10"1 O.6I CM MM CR 3.3x10'1 0.6l CM MM MM 3.3xio‘1 0 MM SMP CR 5.2x10'2 12 MM SMP MM 5.2x10'2 13 MM MM CR 4.0x10-2 7.5 MM MM MM 4.0x10‘2 9.1 aCells grown and penicillin treated in growth media indicated. Lysozyme treatment and regeneration were in media indicated. Abbreviations as indicated previously. % whole cells remaining and % regeneration determined as before. 35 Table 3. Effect of sucrose concentration on protoplast development and regeneration. Media % whole cellsc % regenerationC remaining Experiment la .5 M sucrose 3.0xlO’2 0.4 .4I M sucrose 4.0xl0'2 I.5 Experiment 2a 2 .5 M sucrose l.6xl0' I.l .41 M sucrose 5.9x10-3 1.2 Experiment 3b _3 .5 M sucrose 6.3xl0 3 3.2 .4l M sucrose 9.4xl0’ 5.7 aCells were grown and penicillin treated in CM and trans- ferred to lysozyme in SMP for development of protOpIasts. b Cells were grown and penicillin treated in MM and trans- ferred to lysozyme in SMP for deveI0pment of protoplasts. CWhole cells remaining was determined by dilution in phosphate buffer and plating on CM. determined by dilution in SM and plating on CR. % regeneration was Figure 3. 36 Regeneration process of protoplasts. Prot0plasts were plated in CR. After 48 hours of incubation (32°C) samples were withdrawn and inspected. (A) Large type prot0plast that often developed. (B) Small protoplast with larger amounts of regeneration. The bar represents lO pm. 37 38 protoplast-like forms with many pleomorphic cells in Close proximity in addition to what appeared to be regenerated cells. Colonies on CR plates usually appeared in 3 to 5 days. However, plates were kept incubated two weeks to ensure that any reverting protoplasts had sufficient time to develop. Microscopic examination of colonies on CR plates revealed a variety of pleomorphic forms in addition to normal rods and some remaining coccoid shapes. Agar depth appeared to effect regeneration rates of the protoplasts (Figure 4). Maximal regeneration rates appeared to be at l0 mls of agar per petri dish. Rates dropped sharply with increasing agar depth after l0 mls. The addition of catalase (.02% final concentration) or peni- cillinase (l unit/ml final concentration) to CR had no effect on regeneration. Effect of growth media on the development of proto- plasts was previously pointed out as quite dramatic (Table 3). There was also a noticable effect of this parameter on regeneration. Regeneration rates ranged from l3-7.5% when MM was used as the growth media as opposed to 1.2-0% when CM was used as growth media. In addition, although lysozyme treatment, as stated previously, did not appear to effect protoplast development, it did appear to affect regeneration. Regeneration rates were approximately 2 fold higher when SMMP was used for lysozyme treatment than when MM was used. 39 3.8 3.6 9” n: Wild Typo Colony Forming Units x107 .09 CD 2.6 ' Figure 4. ~6.4 O E 16.0 ° 3 a; a1 3" <5.6 3§ 5'8 19 a .52 E S x d413 E; m .44 «14.0 s 10 1‘5 20 ml agar Regeneration of wild type and His-mutant proto- plasts vs depth of agar: Prot0plasts were pour plated with various agar amounts into petri plates. Wild type H , His-mutant 40 Regeneration media (CR vs MM) itself had a slight effect on regeneration rates. CR appeared to have a slight advantage when CM was used as the growth media. When MM was used as the growth media the tendency was reversed. Finally, the effect of bovine serum albumin (BSA) on the regeneration of protoplasts was tested (Table 4). In II. x _ .’ h '. p each of three separate experiments where BSA was added at a final concentration of 0.I% w/v to both the lysozyme treat- 3 ment and regeneration media, approximately a 3 fold increase . in regeneration rates was observed. 6 Variation in Mutants All investigations of conditions for the development and regeneration of protoplasts were done using the wild type strain as a model. Optimized conditions were then applied to mutants developed for fusion. Figure 5 shows the rate of protoplast deveI0pment measured as % osmotically insensitive cells remaining vs time for 3 different mutants plus the wild type. For each different mutant a different rate was observed. Regeneration rates of mutants appeared to be related to the completeness of prot0plast development. This effect was further investigated by labeling studies with the wild type strain. Determination of Remaining Cell Wall and Relationships to Regeneration The relationship between fraction of cell wall remaining and regeneration was examined. Prot0plasts were developed 4I Table 4. Effect of bovine serum albumin on the regeneration of prot0plastsa % whole cell % regeneration remaining Experiment I -2 w BSA 7.2xl0 2 3.9 w/o BSA 4.8xl0' 1.2 ,3? Experiment 2 1 w BSA 1.3x10" 1.2 w/o BSA 3.0xl0'2 .39 Experiment 3 1 w BSA 2.1x10'1 11 y w/o BSA 2.2x10' 3,4 .ee aCells were cultivated and penicillin treated in CM, lysozyme treated in SMP and regenerated on CR. BSA was added to lysozyme solution and CR at a final concentration of 0.I% w/v. % whole cells remaining and % regeneration was determined as before. 42 %Whole Cells Remaining 20 Figure 5. b A I b b ‘ t F a . A A j I ._A 2 4 t I % Osmotically insensitive cells remaining vs length of lysozyme treatment. Cells were treated for the deveI0pment of protoplasts as described in the materials and met ods. “Wild ty e. HLys'. O-OHis-Str. D—Dmet'Rif . 43 as stated in Materials and Methods. Concentrations of lysozyme and penicillin were varied in order to obtain intervals in which protoplast formation was still incomplete. Initial cell concentration was always I08/ml. In Figure 6 the results of 5 separate experiments with variable treatments as stated in the legend are plotted. It can be seen from these results that as total 3H decreases, Im“ the % regeneration also decreases. The correlation coefficient was 0.9 (P<.005). Figure 7 illustrates the relationship between osmotic sensitivity and 3H remaining. Osmotic sensitivity appears to drop sharply 3! 3 after more than 4 % of the H has been removed. To determine that the total counts in samples were due to (3H) DAP, hydrolyzed samples from experiments using 5 mg/ml lysozyme with 0.2 units/ml penicillin were chromato- gramed and counted. To determine if any (3H) DAP was lost during the hydrolysis procedure and to determine location of (3H) DAP two controls were run as described in the legion of Figure 8. Both controls showed a Single major peak at fractions 4-5 corresponding to an Rf of 0.24. DAP standard (unlabeled) were sprayed with ninhydrin and gave an Rf of 0.24. The Rf for lysine was found to be 0.45. The Rf'S of other amino acids were not determined Since it has been previously reported that 8. lactofermentum will only convert DAP to lysine and will not break down lysine (Tosaka and Takinami, I978). In addition to the single major peak, a 44 %’H Figure 6. A L A g A J A 20 40 5| I0 p p % Regeneration % 3H in protoplasts vs % regeneration of proto- plasts. Data was obtained from 5 separate experiments; 2 experiments where I mg/ml lyso- zyme and 0.2 units/ml penicillin was utilized,C]; 2 experiments where 5 mg/ml lysozyme and 0.2 units/ml penicillin was utilized,.; and l experiment where IO mg/ml lysozyme and 0.3 units/ ml penicillin was utilizedfi) Initial cell concentration was always I08/ml. Procedure for development and regeneration of protoplasts as described in materials and methods. Slope of the line calculated to be 0.8l using linear regression. Calculated correlation was 0.9. %"H 45 ‘m_n MIL-“'45:"! agl-E' ‘ 7 A A 1 n l A L b Figure 7. 20 40 3| ll llfl %Whole Cells Remaining % 3H in protoplasts vs % whole cells remaining. Data was obtained from 4 separate experiments. I experiment utilized l mg/ml lysozyme and 0.2 units/ml penicillin,.; 2 experiments utilized 5 mg/ml lysozyme and 0.2 units/ml penicillin, l experiment utilized IO mg/ml lysozyme and 0.3 units/ml penicillinKl Initial cell concentra— tion was always l0 /ml. Procedure for devel0pment and regeneration of protoplasts as described in materials and methods. 46 .FUI z e :3 eeeeeee>o ee333¥ .38: z e e? .eeee see; ooope we emeeee eemeeseso uocfip em eeeeee aqc Azmv we Emcooumsoccu .mw weaned a3n 0:0 3000 0:0 :3 magnoo mewcum >0 00:3530300 003 3000 £000 :3 030200 .353wo3 003 coppmsucmucou 3300 30333:3 30330 2333303300 353033;: 3.0 new 05330033 ~E\mE m 5333 vapmmeu m3m3 .000 30 0 0033 00330003 03300 among 003 3.03 0.03 330. 30.3 3.03 0.03 .0e0000 e; 03 3.03 3.03 330. 33.0 3.03 0.03 30e0000 e0 0 0.03 3.33 330. 03.0 3.03 0.33 30e0000 e; 3 0.00 0.00 330. 00.0 3.0 0.03 0E3~0m33 e0 03 0.33 0.03 000. 30.3 0.33 3.33 02330033 e; 0 0.03 3.33 030. 30.0 0.03 3.33 0E3~0m33ee 3 0.03 0.00 030. 33.0 3.33 0.33 3030303 axe ucm axm 303 0x0 0:3 0x0 amp qu vcm axm amp 030:302 033 aqo .mEmsmoumsocgu 3300 003330303; 30 300a 3000 :3 030300 mo cowpsnwspmwo .m w3003 50 0 .000. $00 34% .3208 330: :3 30.0338 03003 30.0 420003003 we: 3... wumfaouoen mo :ozmcmcmmmc a: 33 Army 3414 .23:on 30.30.: :m a 0.0 3:03.300: 3.3303805 3:332:03 03:8 30:3 30.0 500.5005 oEANomapumc newest we?» em>o chLesuuo mmmcazu 30:0: 00:0: 2 2 2 2 a o 0 ~ 2 2 2 2 . o o I 1‘ l R 4 ‘ R I I ‘ R R 4 I Q .op mcsmwm °/o SI Protoplast Fusion The procedure for fusion of 8. lactofermentum was as stated in Materials and Methods. A nonselective regenera- tion method was utilized because direct selection with antibiotic markers resulted in high background rates. Frequency was determined by dividing the number of colonies that appeared on selective plates by the population added If to each plate. Population was determined by plating various I dilutions on CM plates. Initially, two different fusion procedures were compared. The first was based on that described by Kaneko and L: Sakaguchi (I979) and the second was based on that presented in a patent by Ajinomoto Co., Japan (I983) (Table 6). For the first procedure, 33% PEG at an average m.w. of 6000 plus 5 mM EDTA at pH 7.0 was used. For the second proce- dure, 33% PEG at an average mw of 6000 plus l0 mM CaClZ at pH 8.0 was used. The data indicated a much higher frequency of recombination for the first procedure than for the second. In fact, the frequency of recombination in the crosses for the second procedure are not substantially different from the control values. The effect of temperature on fusion and recombination was determined in three separate experiments (Table 7). From these three experiments a trend toward higher frequency rates can be detected with increasing temperature. The highest frequency was obtained at 37°C in Experiment 2. 52 Table 6. Comparison of two methods for prot0plast fusion. Frequency of StrRRifR PEG+EDTA PEG+CaCl2 Arg'StrR x Arg'StrR 4.lxl0'7 I.3xlO-8 Met-RifR x Met'RifR “. g E a a, .2 u. D o Q 3 3 0 < C 0 8 E. g 10"I . 10“ 8 U. 0 540 100 NTG lug/m1) Appendix Figure 3. Effect of NTG concentration on mutation frequency and cell viability in the membrane filter rotation method. 78 Appendix Table 3. Inactivation of residual NTG by placing membrane filters on pH 9 plate after NTG treatment. NTG treatmenta Condition for NTG Number of inactivation surviving pH Period (min) cells per membraBe filters - - - 257 1 l3 + 7.2 3 25 i 6 + 9.0 2 I99 i II + 9.0 3 228 i 6 + 9.0 5 209 i 9 aMembrane filters were placed for l min at 25°C on a NTG-soft agar plate containing 200 ug/ml NTG, 0.05 M Tris-maleate buffer (pH 5.5) and 0.45% Difco agar, then transferred on to pH 9 or pH 7.4 soft agar plate containing 0.I M phosphate buffer and 0.45% agar. bMean (in duplicate) 1 standard error. 79 iS shown in Table 4. After determination of optimal conditions of treatment, a few Short experiments were run to attempt mapping with this method. The results are Shown in Figure 4. The time required for replication of the chromosome appears to be approximately 90 minutes. A possible replication map from these experiments is shown in Figure 5. Discussion Nalidixic acid provided a convenient method to produce synchronously growing cultures of 8. lactofermentum. Figure l demonstrates the effect of concentration of Nal on the growth of 8. lactofermentum. Because Nal treatment is to be used for a relatively short period of time only to provide synchrony, it was decided that 250 ug/ml Nal would be better than less repressive doses. Figure 2 illustrates the synchrony achieved when growing cells were treated for 4 hours at this concentration of nalidixic acid. Traditional methods of NTG treatment are somewhat cumbersome and slow. Therefore, a new method was deveI0ped to facilitate more rapid and accurate NTG treatment of synchronous cultures. This method involved placing the synchronous cells on filter disks, treating cells with NTG by placing these disks on agar containing NTG and allowing the NTG to diffuse up into the disks. Residual NTG was then denatured by placing the filters plus treated cells on agar 80 Appendix Table 4. Effect of pH 9 treatment on cell viability. Period of treatment Number of viable cells (min) after treatment 0 2ll 3 223 5 214 IS 235 90 2l8 I35 2l0 50 ul of his I6I cell suspension was applied to each membrane filter, which were then placed on pH 9 plates. At intervals, filters were transferred onto CM-ZG plates, followed by incubating them at 30°C for viable cell counting. 8I A l9> 3' $1111» U a» . 1 # A A A 211» B ISM Appendix Figure 4. Variation in frequency of streptomycin resistant (A) and histidine reversion (B) mutations. 82 hisiGi-i str' Iflsisi-Z I 30 0 . ‘1‘ 3' l I l I I I I fl . 21 11 11 Appendix Figure 5. Replication map of strR in his I6I. " ' m (°/o) and his+ loci 83 at a very high pH for a short period of time. The effective NTG treatment parameters were determined as Shown in Tables I, 2 and 4. Higher concentration of NTG for shorter time periods seemed most effective. The optimal NTG concentra- tion is described using the parameters as shown in Figure 3. This provides the highest amount of reversion for a particular surviving fraction. In this case the most appropriate i concentration is approximately 60 ug/ml NTG. The final A treatment for inactivation of NTG was determined as described in Table 2. pH 9.0 for at least 3 minutes was required to ‘3. denature the NTG as shown by the number of surviving cells. Treatment at this pH was found not to effect cell viability for up to l35 minutes (Table 3). Figure 4 gives the results from one experiment using NTG treatment on synchronously growing cells. The mutant used was a his” mutant of 8. lactofermentum. The generation time under the conditions used was estimated to be 90-l00 minutes. Within this generation period, one peak was obtained for streptomycin resistence and 2 peaks were found for reversion to the WT his+. A tentative map of these markers is shown in Figure 5. The second his+ peak may represent a suppression mutation. Unfortunately, all data using this method was not as straightforward as that depicted. For the most part, the number of colonies obtained for any particular peak was low and difficult to distinguish from background counts. Initial cell counts 84 were hard to standardize and may provide a source of error. In addition, standardization of NTG treatment is essential to reproducing results from experiment to experiment and was difficult with the membrane filters. Conclusion The method developed here for NTG treatment of synchronous cultures is faster and more efficient than those described previously. Treatment of membrane filters on agar at pH 9.0 for a period of time to denature the residual NTG is essential to obtaining consistent results. Preliminary data has shown some inconsistency and some problems with low frequency of mutation over background. However, the results are promising. A tentative placement of some markers has been proposed. At this point in time the method may be as useful as protoplast fusion for chromosome mapping. a"? T BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY Abe, S. and Takayama, K. I972. Amino acid-producing microorganisms, variety and classification. In 188 Microbial Production of Amino Acids. K. Yamada, S. Kinoshitu, T. Tounodu and K. Aida, eds. Halsted Press Publishers, 605 Third Ave., N.Y., N.Y. lOOl6. 73913:” '7 Ahkong, Q.F., Fisher, 0., Tampion, W. and Lucy, J.A. I975. Mechanism of cell fusion. Nature 253:l94-I95. Ajinomoto Co., Inc. l983a. Method for fusion of microbial * protoplast. Jpn. Kokai Tokkyo Koho JP 58 l58, l8l 83,l58,l8l) (Original not seen. Cited from Chem. , Abstracts 100 352 (1984)). Er Ajinomoto Co., Inc. l983b. Fusion of microbial protoplasts. Jpn. Kokai Tokkyo Koho JP 58, l58, I86). (Ori inal not seen. Cited from Chem. Abstracts l00:350 Il984)). Akamatsu, T., and Sekiguchi, J. I982. Transformation of Bacillus protoplasts by plasmid p TP4 DNA. Agric. Biol. Chem. 46:l6l7-l62l. Akamatsu, T., and Sekiguchi, J. I983. Selection methods in bacilli for recombinants and transformants of intro- and interspecific fused protoplasts. Arch. Microbiol. l34: 303-308. Akamatsu, T., and Sekiguchi, J. I984. An improved method of protoplast regeneration for Bacillus species and its application to protoplast fusion and transformation. Agric. Biol. Chem. 48:65l-655. Arnold, K., Pratsch, L., and Gawrisch, K. I983. Effect of poly(ethylene glycol) on phospholipid hydration and polarity of the external phase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 728:l2l-l28. Asada, M., Nakanishi, K., Matsuno, R. and Kamikubo, T. I982. Continuous CoA production with immobilized Brevibacterium ammoniagenes cells. Agric. Biol. Chem. 85 86 Atlas, R.M. and Bartha, R. I972. Degradation and minerali- zation of petroleum by two bacteria isolated from coastal waters. Biotech. Bioeng. l4:297-307. Baltz, R.H. I978. Genetic recombination in Streptomyces fradiae by prot0plast fusion and cell regeneration. J. Gen. Microb. l07:93-l02. Baltz, R.H. and Matsushima, P. l98l. Protoplast fusion in Streptomyces: Conditions for efficient genetic recombina- tion and cell regeneration. J. Gen. Microbiol. l27: l37-I46. Basnak'yan, I., Votrin, I. and Bebow, S.S. I98l. Study of T} the peculiarities of the action of Brevibacterium i' ammoniagenes endonucleases on DNA. Biochemistry (Engl. trans. Biokimiya) 46:l054-l06l. Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 8th Ed. Williams & Wilkins Publ. Co., Buchanan, R.E. et al., f eds. I974. Part l7, pg. 559, Actinomycetes and Related 8; Organisms. Bugaichuk, Y.D., Zuonigorodski, and Zhdanov, V.G. l98l. Conditions for the formation of and reversion to bacillary form of Bacillus lichenoformis protoplasts. Microbiol. 50:494-497. Cerda-Olmedo, E., Hanawalt, P.C. and Guerola, N. I968. Mutagenesis of the replication point by nitrosoquanidine: Map and pattern of replication of the Escherichia coli chromosome. J. Mol. Biol. 33:705-7l9. Chang, S. and Cohen, S. I979. High frequency transforma- tion of Bacillus subtilis protoplasts by plasmid DNA. Molec. Gen. Genet. l68:lll-ll5. Cocking, E.C., Davey, M.R., Pental, D. and Power, J.B. l98l. Aspects of plant genetic manipulation. Nature 293:265-270. Cortzee, J.N., Sirgel, F.A. and Lecatsas, G. I979. Genetic recombination in fused spheroplasts of Providence alcalifaciens. J. Gen. Microbiol. ll4:3l3-322. Collins, M.D., Goodfellow, M. and Minnikin, D.E. I979. Isoprenoid quinone in the classification of Corneform and related bacteria. J. Gen. Microbiol. IIO:l27-l36. 87 Crombach, W.H.J. l97l. DNA base composition and DNA homology of Coryneform bacteria isolated from soil, Cheese and sea fish. J. of Gen. Microbiol. 69:xii. Cullis, P.R., and Hope, M.J. I978. Effects of fusogenic agent on membrane structure of erythrocyte ghosts and the mechanism of membrane fusion. Nature 27l:672-674. Cutler, R.G., and Evans, J.E. I966. Synchronization of bacteria by a stationary-phase method. J. Bacteriol. 9l: 469-476. Demain, A.L. and Soloman, N.A. l98l. Industrial micro- biology. Scientific American 245:67-75. Demonty, J.A., Robaye, B., and Calberg—Bacq, C.M. I973. Envelope structure in three different L-forms of Proteus mirabilis. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 39:2l7-228. Eucleigh, D.E. l98l. The microbial production of industrial chemicals. Scientific American 245:l55-l78. Ferenczy, L. l98l. Microbial prot0plast fusion, in Genetics as a Tool in Microbiology. S.W. Glover and D.A. Hopwood, eds. pp.7l-34, Cambridge University Press. Flowers, R.S., Martin, S.E., Brewer, 0.0. and Ordal, Z.J. I979. Catalase and enumeration of stressed Staphylo- coccus aureus cells. Appl. Environ. Micro. 33:lll2- lll7. Fodor, K. and Alfoldi, L. I976. Fusion of protoplasts of Bacillus megaterium. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 73:2l47-2l50. Fodor, K. and Alfoldi, L. I979. Polyethylene glycol- induced fusion of bacterial protoplasts: direct selection of recombinants. Molec. Genet. l68:55-59. Fraley, R.T., Fornairi, C., and Kaplan, S. I979. Entrapment of a bacterial plasmid in phospholipid vesicles: potential for gene transfer. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 76: 3348-3352. Frehel, C., Lheritier, A., Sanchez-Rivas, C., and Schaeffer, P. I979. Electron microscope study of Bacillus subtilis. Protoplast Fusion I37zl354-l36l. Fu, T.T. and Thayer, D.W. I975. Comparison of batch and semicontinuous cultures for production of protein from mesquite wood by Brevibacterium. SPJM 98A Biotechnol. Bioeng. l7:l749-l760. 88 Gabor, M.H. and Hotchkiss, R.D. l979. Parameters governing bacterial regeneration and genetic recombination after fusion of Bacillus subtilus protoplasts. J. Bacteriol. l37:l346-l353. Gabor, M.H. and Hotchkiss, R.D. I982. Analysis of randomly picked genetic recombinants from Bacillus subtilus. Protoplast Fusion. In Genetic and CeTlular Technology I. U.N. Streips, S.H. Goodgal, W.R. Guild'and G.A. WiTSon, eds. Marcel Dekker Inc., Publ. Gerlinas, R.E., Meyers, D.A., Weiss, G.A., Roberts, R.J. and Murray, K. I977. A specific endonuclease from Brevibacterium albidum. J. Mol. Biol. ll4:433-440. Gibson, S.M., and Strauss, G. I984. Reaction characteristics and mechanisms of lipid bilayer vesicle fusion. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 769:53l-542. Gotz, F., Ahrne, S. and Lindberg, M. l98l. Plasmid transfer and genetic recombination by protoplast fusion by Staphylococci. J. Bacteriol. l45:74-8l. Guerda, N., Ingraham, J.L. and Cenda-Olmeda, E. l97l. Induction of closely linked multiple mutation by nitrosoquanidine. Nature New Biol. 230:l22-l25. Gumpert, J. I980. Electron microscopy analysis of proto- plast fusion in Streptomyces hydroscgpicus and considera- tion of structural alteration in fusing membranes. Arch. Microbiol. I26:263-269. Hales, A. I977. A procedure for the fusion of cells in suspension by means of polyethylene glycol. Somatic Cell Genetics 3:227-230. Honda, K., Maeda, Y., Sasakawa, S., Ohno, H., and Tsuchida, E. I98la. The components contained in polyethylene glycol of commercial grade (PEG-6,000) as cell fusogen. Biochem. Biophys. Research Commun. l0l:l65-I7l. Honda, K., Maeda, Y., Sasakawa, S., Ohno, H., and Tsuchida, E. l981b. Activities of cell fusion and lysis of the hybrid type of chemical fusogens (1) Structure and function of the promoter of cell fusion. Biochem. Biophys. Research Commun. l00:442-448. Hopwood, D.A. l98l. Genetic studies with bacterial proto- plasts. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 35:237-272. '1 I" Io':‘s w: 89 Hopwood, D.A. and Wright, H.M. 1978. Bacterial protoplast fusion: recombination in fused protoplasts of Strepto- myces caelicolor. Molec. Gen. Genet. l62:307-3l7. Hopwood, D.A. and Wright, H.M. 1981. Protoplast fusion in Streptomyces: fusions involving ultraviolet irradiated protoplasts. J. Gen. Microbiol. 126:21-27. Horvath, R.S. l97l. Cometabolism of the herbicide 2,3,6-trichlorobenzoate. J. Agric. Food Chem. l9:29l. I'keda, 1., Fujita, I. and Yoshinaga, F. 1976. Screening of L-isoleucine producers among ethionine-resistant mutants of L-threonine-producing bacteria. Agric. Biol. Chem. 40:511-516. Ingolia, T.D. and Koshland Jr., D.E. 1978. The role of calcium in fusion of artificial vesicles. J. Biol. Chem. 253:3821-3829. Ito, T. and Ohnishi, S. 1974. Ca2+-induced lateral phase separations in phosphatidic acid-phosphatidyl choline membranes. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 352:29-37. Jones, D. 1975. A numerical taxonomic study of Coryneform and related bacteria. J. Gen. Microbiol. 87:52-96. Kaneko, H. and Sakaguchi, K. 1979. Fusion of protoplasts and genetic recombination of Brevibacterium flavum. Agric. Biol. Chem. 43:1007-1013. Kao, K.N. and Michayluk, M.R. 1969. A method for high- frequency intergenetic fusion of plant protoplasts. Planta. 115:355-367. Kao, K.N., Constabel, F., Michayluk, M.R. and Gamborg, 0.C. 1974. Plant protoplast fusion and growth of inter- genetic hybrid cells. Planta 120:215-227. Keddie, R.M. and Cure, G.L. 1979. The cell wall compo- sition of distribution of free mycolic acid in named strains of Coryneform bacteria and in isolated from various natural sources. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 42:229- 252. Kepes, F. and Kepes, A. 1981. Long-lasting synchrony of the division of enteric bacteria. Biochem. Biophsy. Research Rommun. 99:761-767. 9O Knutton, S. and Pasternak, C.A. 1979. The mechanism of cell-cell fusion. Trends Biochem. Science 220-223. Komagata, K., Yamada, K., and Ogawa, H. 1969. Taxonomic studies on Coryneform bacteria l: Division of bacteria cells. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 15:243-259. Kondo, J.K., and McKay, L.L. 1982. Transformation of Streptococcus lactis protoplasts by plasmid DNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 43:1213-1215. Landman, O.E., and Forman, A. 1969. Gelatin-induced reversion of protoplasts of Bacillus subtilis to the bacillary form: Biosynthesis of macromolecules and wall during successive steps. J. Bacteriol. 99:576-589. m I; 1——‘—‘- C? W5 Landman, O.E., Ryter, A., and Frehel, C. 1968. Gelatin- induced reversion of protoplasts of Bacillus subtilis to the bacillary form: Electron-microscopic and physical study. J. Bacteriol. 96:2154-2170. um .14.." - Tali irhaib“ McDonald, K.0., and Burke, W.F. Jr. 1984. Plasmid trans- formation of Bacillus sphaericus 1593. J. Gen. Microbiol. 130:203-208. Minton, N.P., and Morris, J.G. 1983. Regeneration of Clostridium pasteurianuin ATCC 6013. J. Bacteriol. 155:432-434. Momose, H. and Takagi, K. 1978. Glutamic acid production in biotin-rich media by temperature-sensitive mutants of Brevibacterium lactofermentum, a novel fermentation process. Agric. Biol. Chem. 42:1911-1917. Nakamori, S. and Isamu, S. 1970. Microbial production of L-threonine. Part 11. Production by alpha-amino-beta- hydroxyvaleric acid-resistant mutants of glutamate— producing bacteria. Agric. Biol. Chem. 34:448-456. Nara, T., Misawa, M., Komuro, T. and Kinoshita, S. 1969. Production of nucleic-acid related substances by fermen- tative processes. Part 21: Biosynthetic mechanisms involved in 5 purine ribonucleotide production by Brevibacterium ammoniagenes. Agric. Biol. Chem. 33: 358-369. Nimi, 0., Kubo, M., and Sugiyama, M. 1983. Protoplast formation and the regeneration of Bacillus brevis ATCC 9999 and its mutants. Biotech. Lett. 5:709-714. 91 Ochi, K., Hitchcock, M.J.M. and Katz, E. 1979. High- frequency fusion of Streptomyces parvulus or Strepto- myces antibioticus protoplasts induced by polyethylene glycol. J. Bacteriol. 139:984-992. Okamoto, T., Fujita, Y., and Irie, R. 1983. Protoplast formation and regeneration of Streptococcus lactis cells. Agric. Biol. Chem. 47:259-263. Papahadjopoulos, D., Poste, G., Schaeffer, B.E. and Vail, W.J. 1974. Membrane fusion and molecular segregation in phospholipid vesicles. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 352: 10-28. F: PapahadjOpoulos, 0., Vail, W.J., Pangborn, W.A. and Poste, G. 1976. Studies of membrane fusion 11. Induction of fusion in pure phospholipid membranes by calcium ions and other divalent metals. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 448: 265-283. F12 Peberdy, J.R. 1980. Protoplast fusion - a tool for genetic manipulation and breeding in industrial microorganisms. Enzyme Microbiol. Technol. 2:23-27. Pirnik, M.P., Atlas, R.M. and Bartha, R. 1979. Hydrocarbon metabolism by Brevibacterium erythrogenes: normal and branched alkanes. J. Bacteriol. 119:868-878. Pitcher, 0.6. 1983. Deoxyribonucleic acid base composition of Corynebacterium dipheriae and other corynebacteria with cell wall type IV FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 16:291-295. Pontocorvo, G. 1975. Production of mammalian somatic cell hybrids by means of polyethylene glycol treatment. Somatic Cell Genetics 1:397-400. Rose, A.H. 1981. The microbiological production of food and drink. Scientific American 245(3), pp. 127-138. Rott, B., Nitz, S. and Freidhelm, K. 1979. Microbial decomposition of sodium pentachlorophenolate. J. Agric. Food Chem. 27:306. Rytir, V., Caslavska, J., Konickova-Radochova, M., and Konicek, J. 1982. Modification of the cell wall in Brevibacterium sp. M27. Folia Microbiol. 27:267-268. Ryu, D.D.Y., Kim, K.S., Cho, N.Y. and Pai, H.S. 1983. Genetic recombination in Micromonospora rosaria by protoplast fusion. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 45: 1854-1858. 92 Sato, A., and Furuya, A. 1977. Accumulation of guanosine- poly-phosphates by Brevibacterium ammoniagenes; conditions for the accumulation. Agric. Biol. Chem. 41:641-646. Schaeffer, P., Cami, B. and Hotchkiss, R.D. 1976. Fusion of bacterial protoplasts. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 73: 2151-2155. Schaitman, C.H. 1981. Cell fractionation. In Manual of Methods for General Bacteriology. pp. 52-61, P. Gerhardt, R.G.E. Murray, R.N. Costilow, E.W. Nester, N.A. Wood, N.R. Krieg and G.B. Phillips, eds. American Society for Microb., pub. Washington, 0.C. Schmidt, R.H., Morris, H.A., Castberg, H.B. and McKay, L.L. 1976. Hydrolysis of milk proteins by bacteria used in cheese making. J. Agric. Food Chem. 24:1106-1113. Seiler, H. 1983. Identification key for coryneform bacteria derived by numerical taxonomic studies. J. Gen. Microb. 129:1433-1471. Shehata, T.E. and Marr, A.G. 1970. Synchronous growth of enteric bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 103:789-792. Shepard, J.F., Bidney, D., Barsby, T. and Kemble, R. 1983. Genetic transfer in plants through interspecific protoplast fusion. Science 219:683-688. Shiio, I., Sugimoto, S., and Kawamura, K. 1982. Production of L-tryptophan by azaserine-resistant mutants of Brevibacterium flavum. Agric. Biol. Chem. 46:1849-1854. Shimizu, S., Tani, Y., and Ogata, K. 1979. Synthesis of CoA and its biosynthetic intermediates by microbial processes. In Methods in Enzymology. McCormic, D.B., and Wright, L.D. eds. Academic Press, N.Y. 62:236-245. Shtannikov, A.V., Livshits, V.A. and Zhdanova, N.I. 1981. Fusion of protoplasts and genetic recombination in Coryneform bacteria and in Brevibacterium flavum. Sov. Genet. (Engl. transl. Genetika) 17:924-931. Smith, C.L., Ahkong, Q.F., Fisher, 0. and Lucy, J.A. 1982. Is purified polyethylene glycol able to induce cell fusion? Biochim. Biophys. Acta 692:109-114. Stackebrandt, E. and Fiedler, F. 1975. DNA-DNA homology studies among strains of Arthrobacterium and Brevi- bacterium. Arch. Microbiol. 120:289-295. 93 Stahl, M.L. and Pattee, P.A. 1983a. Computer-assisted chromosome mapping by protoplast fusion in Staphylo- coccus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 154:395-405. Stahl, M.L. and Pattee, P.A. 1983b. Confirmation of protoplast fusion - derived linkages in Staphylococcus aureus by transformation with protoplast DNA. J. Bacteriol. 154:406-412. Sun, S.T., Hsand, C.C., Day, E.P. and Ho, H.T. 1979. Fusion of phosphatidylserine and mixed phosphatidyl- serine-phosphotadylcholine vesicles: Dependence on calcium concentration and temperature. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 557:45-52. Teshiba, S., and Furuya, A. 1982. Mechanism of 5'-Inosinic acid accumulation by permeability mutants of Brevibacterium ammoniagenes. I. Genetical improvement of 5'IMP productivity of a permeability mutant of B. ammonia- genes. Agric. Biol. Chem. 46:2257-2263. Tilcock, C.P.S. and Fisher, D. 1979. Interaction of phospholipid membranes with poly(ethylene glycol)s. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 557:53-61. Tilcock, C.P.S., and Fisher, 0. 1982. The integration of phospholipid membranes with poly(ethylene glycol) vesicle aggregation and lipid exchange. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 688:645-652. Tosaka, 0., and Takinami, K. 1978. Pathway and regulation of lysine biosynthesis in Brevibacterium lactofermentum. Agric. Biol. Chem. 42:95-100. Tsuchida, T., Yoshinaga, F., Kubota, K. and Momose, H. 1975a. Production of L-valine by 2-thiazolea1anine- resistant mutants derived from glutamic acid-producing bacteria. Agric. Biol. Chem. 39:1319-1322. Tsuchida, T., Yoshinaga, F., Kubota, K., Momose, H. and Okumura, S. 1975b. Cultural conditions for L-leucine production by strain no. 218, a mutant of Brevibacterium lactofermentum 2256. Agric. Biol. Chem. 39:1149-1153. Udou, T., Ogawa, M. and Mizuguchi, Y. 1982. Spheroplast formation of Mycobacterium smegmatis and morphological aspects of their reversion to the bacillary forms. J. Bacteriol. 151:1035-1039. 94 Ward, G.B., Hang, M.W. and Glazer, D.A. 197D. Synchronous reinitiation of chromosome replication in E. coli B/r after Nalidixic acid treatment. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 66:365-369. Weiss, R.L. 1976. Protoplast formation in E. coli. J. Bacteriol. 128:668-670. Wojcieszyn, J.W., Schlegal, R.A., Lumley-Sapanski, K., and Jacobson, K.A. 1983. Studies on the mechanism of polyethylele glycol-mediated cell fusion using fluores- cent membrane and cytoplasmic probes. J. Cell Biol. 96: 151-159. Woodley, C.L., Baldwin, J.N. and Greenberg, J. 1981. Nitrosoguanidine sequential mutagenesis mapping of Mycobacterium tuberculosis genes. J. Bacteriol. 197: 176-180. Wright, W.E. 1978. The isolation of heterkaryous and hybrids by a selective system using irreversible biochemical inhibitors. Exper. Cell Research 112:395- 406. Wyrick, P.B. and Rogers, H.J. 1973. Isolation and characterization of cell wall defective variants of Bacillus subtilus and Bacillus lichenformis. J. Bacteriol. 116:456-465. Yamada, Y., Inouye, G., Tahara, Y. and Kondo, K. 1976. The menaquinone system in the classification of Coryneform and Nocardioform bacteria and related organisms. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 22:203-214. Yamada, K. and Komagatu, K. 1970a. Taxonomic studies on Coryneform bacteria, II. Principal amino acids in the cell wall and their taxonic significance. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 16:103-113. Yamada, K. and Komagatu, K. 1970b. Taxonomic studies on Coryneform bacteria, III. DNA base composition of Coryneform bacteria. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 16: 215-224. Yoshinaga, F. 1969. Studies on the fermentation production of L-proline. IV. Mechanism of L-proline production by Brevibacterium flavum. 2247 no. 14-5. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 15:387-398. M 11111111111111 “1111111111111 1111111111 E 3 1293 03083 2699