c4 0 231 2 cm 2]: 3‘5 :3 TE‘HE DESIGN OF A STEEL TAENTOR GATE FOR MOORE’S PARK DAM L“ NSENG. MECHICAN Tiesis for the Degree of B. S?- \iOHN 3. HARTMAN 1929 THE DESIGN OF A STEEL TAINTOR GATE FOR MOORE'S PARK DAM LANSING, MICHIGAN A thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Michigan State College of Agriculture and Applied Science '. a! l _,- bytm" John S? figgtman Candidate for the Degree of Bachelor of Science June 1929 THESIS A—vb" - MOORE'S PARK DAM - Moore's Park Dam was constructed in 1906. Its purpose is to furnish water to the condensers of the steam power plant near by, however, some power is developed by the turbines and generators at the dam when water is abundant. Below is a picture of the dam, showing the power plant. overflow dam nith splash-boards, and the spillway proper. The steam po;er plant is at the right, but cannot be seen in the picture. The picture below is a more distinct view of the spillway. The wooden Taintor gates can easily be distinguished. An "I! beam can be seen on top of the axis of the gate to the left. The reinforcement was placed there after the gate had been installed. as it was necessary to keep that portion of the gate from failins -REEARKS- This thesis is a design of a steel Taintor gate to take the place of the wooden one now in use. The wooden gates have proven satisfactory except for their axis, which is of steel and is designed of insufficient strength. In studying the subject of this thesis, one great fault that can be found with the present design of the dam is the fact that there is no means of keeping the ice melted away from the spillway gates. By experience, it has been found that although the gates are only open about once a year, this time always occurs in the spring while the ice is still solid. Before the gates can be raised it is necessary to cut the ice away from them, which often takes three or four days. This is both expensive and dangerous. It is not only expensive due to the amount of work required to remove the ice, but also due to the damage often done to the gates. The last time the ice was removed, one gate was so badly damaged that it had to be replaced. The danger factor due to the great length of time required to get the gates open is of no less importance. If the water should rise very rapidly in the spring before it was expected to, it might even become necessary to dynamite the gates in order to save the power plant. It is therefore essential that some means of keeping the ice melted away from the gates be installed, whether wooden or steel gates are used. After a careful study of the situation it has been decided that of the three possible methods of heating Taintor gates, steam, electricity, and compressed air, the latter would be the most satisfactory. An air compressor could be installed in the power house and pipes laid to the spillway, the discharge pipe being laid slightly above the gates in the bottom of the river. Although this steel Taintor gate is designed to be placed in the buttments as they are now, there are two suggestions which could be made if the buttments were to be designed new. (1) Embedded in the wall of the buttment for the belting of the gate to fit against is a wooden member. This piece is not satisfactory due to the fact that it is out of water part of the time causing it to rot. A good grade of concrete would be Just as watertight and would be more lasting than this inlaid timber. (2) As the gate now stands, the wooden sill of the gate rests on the concrete base of the buttment, to form a watertight Joint. If a steel gate is used, wood against steel gives the most satisfactory Joint. In such a design a treated oak timber embedded in the concrete at the base of the gate, for the steel beam of the gate to rest upon, would prove satisfactory as this would be watertight and the timber, always being under water, would last a long time. - PROCEDURE - In undertaking this design the first step was to scale the dimentions of the spillway. A sketch of the piers as . found is one of the blueprints. The taintor gate was designed to fit the piers as they are in this sketch. All dimentions would necessarily have to be checked before the actual building of the gate. Welded Joints were selected not because they are more satisfactory than riveted Joints, but because of the desire of the author to become more familiar with them. In the investigation it has become appearant that until more is known about such welding, it would be advisable to continue with the old reliable method of riveted Joints. In this design the unit allowable stress for welded Joints in tension and shear is used as 5,000 Lbs. per Sq. In. giving a factor of safty of six which is recommended by most authorities on structual welding. C OPIPUTAT IONS 5. 51110.7 2 I7 0 0 I 24 - 20' M o = 48°— 40' ABC = 48.67 (2) 3.1416 (17) = 14.451 “336“” Total pressure against gate: 14.45 x 62.5 x %g a 6,320#/' width of gate Use six channels. Uniform load on each channel: 6 320 . 1,053fll' _.I.6___ 1,053e/v 11311131112 A-A A l, A ,0 :5 :C J I llllzn 4 - /3.8:? gfi Ma = Mb 3 1,055 x £3 a 1,053 x (6.915)2 - 1,053 x 6.91d 2 (6.915 - Y) = 0 Y2 4 13.83Y - 47.6 . 0 Y = - 13.83 tiZ/(13.83)2 -+ 4 x 47.6 = - 6.915 t 7191.191 2 "“z““' Y = - 6.915 e 9.8 = 2.885' mg g 1,053 x (2.885)2 3 4,350 #' 2 Mb = 1,053 x2(6.9l5)2 - 6.915 x 1,053 x 4.03 = 25.100 - 29,450 = 4,350 #' z = 6.915 - 2.885 = 4.03! 3:4.03' I:2.88' 4,350 #' : 52,200 #" M'- I : 52 200 = 3.27 'S 0' I0,000 Try a 5", 9 # channel I z 808 = 3052 (001(0) 573,9 # 0 2.5 channel MEMBER B - B Total pressure against gate - 6,320 #/' width. 6,520 x 6.915 = 45,700 # on half the gate. Davide two ways the center beam taking half the load. 43 700 : 21,850 #, eccentric loading. ___é____ Try 6" x 6" x 5" angle '0 L a 16' z 192" r : 1.17" L 3 192 a 164 ( allowable stress 3 4,800 #lsq. ") I‘ e 21 850 a 3,080 #/sq." (compression for axial loading) Tin“ x a 1.73 - .625 = 1.105" M a 1.105 x 21,850 a 24,100 a" MD 3 IS 24,100 x 1.73 = 24.2 x S S : 1,720 #/sq." (compression due to bending moment) Total compressive stress = 1,720 e 3,080 - 4,800 #lsq." Total allowable compressive stress a 4,800 #lsq." TELEBER C - C Compression load = 1,053 x 6.915 I 7,500 # Unsupported length not over 24" Assume a 3" x 3" x g? angle A : 2.11 sq." r : .58" p a 24 - 41.4 #lsq." (allowable stress - 13,000 #/sq.") r .50 7,500 : 3,550 #lsq." (compression for axial loading) '1 E X = .89"— M : 7500 x .89 : 6,680 #" M C : I S 6,680 x .89 = 1.8 x S S a 3,300 #lsq." (compression due to bending moment) Total compressive stress : 3,550 6 3,300 = 6,850 #lsq." Total allowable compressive stress - 13,000 #Isq." 10. 3"13"x3" Angle 0.K. ll. SPACIHG 0F CHnKKEL “y Uniform load of 1,053 #l' of each.beam. wag 3 1,053 n? = 1 053 x 2 x 2 . 33.7 a - n: q 5.81' a-5.81' hfi - 1,053 x 2 x 2 . 67.4 62.5 ‘ h2 a 8.22‘ b = 8.22'- 5.81' U 2.41' b-2.4l' = 1053 x2 x 3 n 101' 62.5 h...3 a 10.07 0 = 10.07 " 8.22 8 1085‘ 031.85' a 1053 x 2 x a . 135' 62.5 d. . 11062' " 10.07' g 1.55, d31e55' l 053 x 2 I 5 : 168.4’ 5 ““"62.5 h5 3 13.00' 608 h 111.11.11.11 .__.1 “>80 D‘ M II = 13.00 " 11062 = 1038' 631.38. 053 x 2 x 6 g 202 62.5 Q 65; H P” f = 14.22 " 13000 = 1022' £81.22. MEMBER D * D .1 /?. l l J N ‘\!‘\11 00 (pg . <0 k3 My SR "3 s e; ,3 W ‘\ “r N QiK & I F k. l l H, Hg: 5217500 61.1117500 :6 Q I - 7,500 ( .377 0 .119 ) R, 3 3.720 # ”i a 3,720.: 5.81.: 12 : 259,000 #" uc:I'8 I : 259looo x.5 . 81m.4 0 Use a 10"., 25 1% channel. 12. 37E 351131311 - AXIS ~ A3.83’ nu” ‘ \ -¢1m344~2 7r . 13. P , whz x 13.83 = 2.5 x (14)2 x 13.83 . 42,400 a 2 2 2 4 M : 42,400 x 2.885 x 12 : 1,470,000 #" Try a 12" steel pipe 1" thick. I = %_(3.l416)( 64 - 54) = .785 (1296 - 625) - 525 In.4 MC=IS 1,470,000 x 6 : 525 x S s = 16,010 #lsq." (O.K. ) 10" pipe 1" thick R. A / wag . 62.5 x (5.5)2 . 945 # / 2 2 / I / .3 R, z 315 # / R2 : 630 # / . tub? _ _ whz =‘315 2 / / ,’ ' h? = 10.08 L__uzé_-ag__né? 2 h: = 3.18 M = 315 x 3.18 x 12 a 315 x 1.06 x 12 a 315 x 12 ( 3.18 - 1.06 ) a 8,000 #" hement taken up by the g? plate: MC=IS M’x .1875 : 12 x (.375)3 x 16,000 12 M = .0527 x 16,000' = 4,500 #" 71875 8,000 - 4,500 = 3,500 #" to be taken up by angles per foot width of gate. Try 3" x 3" x 1" angles a (per angle) a 1.2 x 16,000 . 8,900 #" 2.16 8,900 a 2.57 (space angles 2.5' or less) 9 14. 3"X3 "x1" 4' angles spaced 2.5' or less TIE ROD (axis to pier) P a 42,400 # 2’ Area : 42 000 = 2.62 sq." 11:11:00 2.62 x 1.5 = 3.94 sq." (use) 2.25" rod = 3.976 sq." 15. 1188 2%" rd VELDED COHHECTIONS (all welds are %" bead) (allowable strength of weld is 5,000 #lsq." which gives a factor of safty of six.) Plate to Member E - B At ends and in center 1" on each side of E - E. members A—A to 0-0 and 0-0 to D-D Shearing load : 7,500 # 7 500 a 1.5 sq. In. weld 11550 Members D—D to B-B Shearing load: 21,850 # ‘31'0‘50' 16. N075 - Tf/[SE D/ME/VS/O/VS Wf/‘PE HOUG/fl)’ SCAZED 0/7: //V TH! / CHECK AAA /MPO/?7A/VT D/ME/Vfi/O/VS BEFOfi’f USI/VG 771/5 0.55/6” 3"x #470,“, 7/4/50? 3145,5050 //V WALL AND FLUSH WITH /7'. Is --_-......J 4—2-lou~n| 7‘9 4‘4, ,' 3.3 ,, I [I I I ll /‘0*~— .3 ‘3 ————>— 1 /.9-'/o " PLAN H56"... I56 "4. /-'6 L 4 I _1__. 0x II I +3-3—— 510” 3-51 .556 T/O/V A v4 SKETCH 0F 5P/LLWAY P/ERaS A5 /.3 M 0019223 PAH/1’ DAM ZA/VJ/NG M/CH/GA/V MAy, ”25 SCALE ~ 2 /- -’o ' 5541.527 87 - Job/7 Hartman DRAW/v .37 ~ Jo/m Hart/non 75 4 X/4-’4 X5” PLATE L‘B‘1 .5 Z'IFFENEHB 3'x3 xi’ {VI/61.55 BEA/7' WITH I7 RAD/U5 AND CHIMPfD ’47— 0/VEf/VD 70 F/T CMN/VELS- .1 W520 STIFFE/VERS / ON EACH 5/05 70 7H5 PLATE AT ONE [IVD AND AT THE (ENTfR AND 70 THE (HAN/VII AT 7H5 07/15}? [ND .’ "[‘T'I/ / " [7 DRIIII-‘O #0155 6‘-’ , ig’ 5‘3" I I ‘I I ll PLATE ' : II II I II 1' I I' I: I I aurr JoI/vrfi . :' ' ‘ I: l i: I — --- ----‘|-4-’— -! -:_-_--._-:“--"-=-_.-_=-.- - -- - ..I __________ 41.}. ....... 11C..___:::.:'.. . l' , n : l' . II ' II | [I ' II I II ' ‘ i' ' " 1 I I: ' l1 l I! I g , z " I I ' '1 ‘ _, J _ II _ II . _ II, IN ' I: l :l '. :: 3‘ :1 I 5 I i' "‘5 ii 4“- J! L " ' =::_-...--.--_-:.-_- : == ==:=E-_-.-_ - :.-_.—-=:=.===_-u' ‘ _--.-___ “:51?“ __---.. “TI- ---- ---- -1. “V \ i! ' " i :l ’\ CENTER' u I :' , I. Q» 1m: " : ll . i :1 l 1' | I' N I I |l |l N .I "I |I .. l I: I' : (I ' :19- 'l I. I " ' I '—- ---.a-.-a=-.—.-_—_:- -_—_.-_.- --—- -£:—-:L-l———-— ' _ - _ _ ___.%'i‘__ ._:::_ f::.I:I:::;—_‘_‘:':’ff ‘ ll '1 _ Ev . 'l -_-..- 3;.- :51-i: _________ 4...,— .._-_-_.._- _ L I II I .l' I I. , I' ' I' ' J. 1 : - -._._--.._,_,=__J_L -—-I—-'—I"hf S ‘ 8 IL---.. -.....- $ —— h-qh-——:’-—-”- D—II—fl-f- -— -, ----- ._ I. 6 x 4 x ' l * 000.815 A/va . 'i “we are VII-773.; . : 21/0" I I I g - = =- 8-...“A JL'iss-JI-t.‘ Pusan-1' I .2 /2j "57,532 P/Ff /’ TH/ CK ‘ \ \ W515 race car 1.4;: m / '2 .7 " (214.425 wanw Ill/1542455 IN 50515. 6"xs"xg’ 4s. wszo AT 45/7- :wo fuzz DISTANCE oxv 607H 5/0155 J Npfl _______, ._—-—-, 7UP VIEW OFAX/S ‘ P/PE EMBEDED //V C 0N6Rf TE 25 7/5 800 (5N TEE l/IVF 0F P/fl"? / 5 3' 9 ”CHAN/V515 I3 5M "MA/,6 / WILD 7'0 PLATE /' EYt‘R)’ 8 cc. 04/ [AC/1 5/05 0/” (HA IVA/[L ' —* ELAAI «Ion-9*— /'3 -——>1-t-—— 1:8 ——-)L—— 113"“ ' d l‘-—-/"o f "say/435 limo 301.7 ‘0” ‘ m”, 25"CHA/wi/n /35/a"/.o/V6 ‘ CUT BACK AT [N05 cw ,4/v ANGLE ——“ —- 4 '5 ’- .. _..-‘ -— .‘fl ,——‘ —" ’.. \ ”arc” A/VGII / "x 5” 3 X3 X39 (3. W540 F041. D/JTA/VCI 0N [ACH END 0F 1. / WITH 2' x {' WAS/{FR s ’j: pzr 80681-7? an 7//ve 7/0 - 7H 1' ’l 12" x 6 7/754 750 mm TIMEIR nrrro w P4,ACE m 7H5 FIELD H£LD 5y f 80175 CONT/#05005 WILD ZKQZ'E' .41.; 5267.05 ms: 55.410 4 36 é/Qé fiLEl/fi 7’/0/V 70 ANCHOR I/V PIER SOL/D STEEL COLLAR. MAC’I-g/IVED Hat /2 g .0/AME7EA I l n WELD ALL CON/VICT/A/G SURFACES THE DESIGN '0; A STEEL TA/NTOR GATE FOR MOURES PARK DAM LANSING, M/(‘H/GA/V MA Y H /.92.7 5011.5 4 .- / ’ DfS/G'NI'D BY ' John Hartman ORA W/V BY ‘ Jo/yfl Hart/7100 / $7" I, ' "'clfii'fiu‘LMILTlflfl'lflTuflfiflflfflufiiflwllafl'l‘lfim‘s