fII'II 6’26“” III I II55II‘“‘.‘.I ‘IIIII ‘ III ‘55 '||‘:' I 'IrIufi. 6' 666666 I 5 ‘5'5. .555I‘55555I5I‘5 6 .-’ 53M 6 III 566666556666 II "““5 ‘5 ‘I 5‘5I ‘5‘5‘ ”Ila; 1515 III III—5555' 5555‘ III I" “II I" 5. I " III“ I‘I‘I‘ I ‘I IIWIII‘I ‘In‘! 6.565. III}, ,5; “'5‘ IJ 666M III‘II‘ 61615 IIIII I 5 I‘fl‘ “wwwq 55‘ h‘ W.” ._ III".%"H'KLJfiuVI. ” . 5 II II '55 I“ 555 IIIII"“‘II :‘55555‘5‘ .-5 I6 .6555 I :6 “I55 I‘I‘IW 5-5555 III" IIIIM :.$51 3:25?- ..-£;.,.£_ .,. - “. 4“ =33" m3 525;?“ a, - ......:..>.m:. 1': 2‘. Q! 6 ‘.o-. ‘ ‘- — vlgv '. ”.2. . “1-3:. .-'-"- ' 5 .".-.':-°~":__~'~x.-." :: 2‘ _ -":? 4.21:: 5 WM... .....-... u-- 4- . ¢'- 1‘ o 4- . - n - . I- 6» h Hm '55_16I 5555555;- x‘: I ' : o 'v :3 ' 'Z I. . I I’ 9 6§IIIEEJ§6£ - : a, t ' '5' I : 5 T .m _.'¢ I if .. . x ‘5 '5 ' I .J n? ‘. I: h. I. U u . .. .: 15$ -............- W . .M by. 5 5‘26“, IIm5 ”6 55555 I, 6‘65 6655 III 6::I5 655I I‘IIII III!» 5‘6 fiflfij fi#‘ 6 “$5“ I J 55' II‘I‘III III II .II‘ ‘ “ I‘III‘ III 55 ’5“ ‘.55I‘I5I5~“‘”~*5‘53'i5" II III III ‘III “ E.E?5"-II‘IIII ‘I‘I‘I‘III‘I 6I5I5IIII5‘III5‘5 3“ “' II55 ;,-. ' ‘5 55 III “III ”51.165555 5255' Iflsz' “”535 . :.I5555I 5'55555IIII" ' ~- I .' -- vir RI 56I3HIIII1“ IJIIIIIII‘ “"‘II In“ I‘I‘I’IIII‘I ‘ ‘. "'I «I I ISIIII‘HI ‘Isu066 MHI .3 ' "ir.‘ {5166 ‘III‘ 1,5‘5‘II,IIIII‘II 555IIII6II _ .1513? " f 565i . I‘IIIIII'I5IITIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII‘II‘IIIIII‘IIIIEI‘II-v.F ‘5“ ‘MI‘IIEIEI 5.5655515 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 5II’5I5‘I5I... 55555I I5 1‘5 5 5 ‘ 5 555‘ II'h‘IIIIIIII III“ IIIIII'I I366 5'II‘5 II‘I‘IIHI‘III ‘s‘I, I I. I 55555 II‘II‘I‘II‘ III I‘IIII‘56 II 5‘55 I I 6II‘66 dIIII? IIIIII‘ I‘I'IIIIIJ‘II‘I II IIIIIII‘J I :II“! I; I? II‘ ' 5 ‘ 5'II III "“I‘ 55; WEB-:5 'g‘ - ' III-III“? I'II _ I‘IjIIIe. IIIJIIII III . I. I 5Q6I6,W‘&u mI I‘II‘I ‘ III III“ 555 "I III" 5 - =I " I'II‘I‘I IIIIIII.“ ,,,, 66‘ .‘ "‘IV‘III‘I ' ‘I ‘II 2.5.: .,‘I. : I '2; . I gpl‘f‘é‘lflifi “£16.? IIIII IIBIIIIiIITI‘II 6661 III}! :6 :65? 56.5.6 ,, I A " III i. Y| ‘ 5 5 5 III-III III 5‘55“ I’I‘II‘ I5 M .A:.x THESlS g I 2?. #1; I it? ,‘ii '6' 3- Q3 ETV' y q“ ’3' 33 w, . 3" AIL'J' 5.1 V4113? i'i'iate Unfiverséty This is to certify that the thesis entitled A MULTIPLE FORECASTING SYSTEM FOR THE TELECOMMUNICATION INDUSTRY presented by Charles M. Holmes has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for M.A. degree in Telecommunication @l/Mw Major professo{/ D Qty/CA 22] ”7ij RObert E. Yadon ate ' U U / 0-7539 MS U is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Institution MSU LIBRARIES .—_—L RETURNING MATERIALS: Place in book drop to remove this checkout from your record. FINES will be charged if book is returned after the date stamped below. 33-4 R04 ‘5 ‘V L. 4| 1‘ 1‘ '4' ‘ ‘5 I}?! 3? LaL: a :t- :4:- :2: USE Chili I 41- A——'- FPO-4‘ (qr-nfl-V r- —-"-"' 6 . .1 L A MULTIPLE FORECASTING SYSTEM FOR THE TELECOMMUNICATION INDUSTRY By /7/—- 5759/ Charles M. Holmes A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Department of Telecommunication 1983 Accepted by the faculty of the Department of Telecommunication, College of Communication Arts and Sciences, Michigan State University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Masters of Arts @Mww Director of The51s degree. Coo right by CHA LES N. HOLMES 1983 ABSTRACT A MULTIPLE FORECASTING SYSTEM FOR THE TELECOMMUNICATION INDUSTRY By Charles w. Holmes The purpose of this study is to develop a computerized multiple forecasting system for use in the telecommunication industry. This quantitative tool is designed for both managers and potential investors who must prepare realistic projections of business activity. Several different methods of time-series analysis are used in the program, each having strengths and weaknesses in handling various data sets. Any data set introduced into the system will follow a pattern or trend. The individual forecasting routines attempt to match the pattern and project it into the future. The forecasting method which comes closest in matching the pattern will provide the most accurate forecasts. The system evaluates itself with built-in measures of accuracy for each method including variance, standard error and the number of residuals exceeding two standard deviations. The system then provides a method analysis using the mean square error for each routine in order to identify the method which provides the best set of forecasts. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not have been completed without the encouragement and guidance of Dr. Robert E. Yadon. I would like to thank him for his support and most of all for his patience. I must also thank Linda Yadon for her hospitality and inspiring good nature. Without her graciousness, this task would certainly have been unbearable. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES ........................ vi LIST OF FIGURES ooooooooooooooooooooooo v1. .i CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION AND STATEMENT OF PURPOSE ....... 1 Introduction ................... 1 Statement of Purpose ............... 3 Scope of Study ................... 5 NOTES ....................... 8 11. REVIEW OF LITERATURE ................ 10 Forecasting Simulation ............... 11 Telecommunication Acquisition Models ........ l4 NOTES ....................... 21 III. FORECASTING METHODOLOGY .............. 23 Introduction .................... 23 Forecasting Defined ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 23 Forecasting Components ............... 24 Forecasting Methods ................ 27 NOTES ...................... 46 IV. THE MULTIPLE FORECASTING PROGRAM .......... 50 Introduction ................... 50 The Data Set ................... 51 Forecasting Routines ................ 52 iv CHAPTER Page IV. (continued) The Program ..................... 58 Sample Run ...................... 6O NOTES ........................ 74 V. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....... 75 Introduction ..................... 75 Summary of Results .................. 75 Limitations ..................... 77 Conclusions ..................... 79 Recommendations ................... 79 BIBLIOGRAPHY ............. , ............. 82 APPENDIX ............................ 84 Table LIST OF TABLES Page Buffalo Viewership Trends ............... 4 Forecasting Possibilities ............... 11 Listing and Ranking of Radio Stations in Hypothetical Market ...................... 17 Comparison Between Audience Shares and Theoretical Shares ...................... 18 Monthly Revenues for a Midwest Radio Station . . . . 51 Control Cards and Data Deck ............. 58 Contrgl Card Specifications for the Sample Computer 60 un ........................ vi Figure 3-1. 3-2. 3-3. 3-4. LIST OF FIGURES Page Horizontal Data Pattern ............... 26 Seasonal Data Pattern ................ 26 Cyclical Data Pattern ................ 26 Trend Data Pattern .................. 26 vii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION AND STATEMENT OF PURPOSE Introduction Broadcast station acquisition involves many steps; the most critical entails the process of investment analysis. Because first time investors are generally inexperienced in the businesses of broadcasting, lack of specific skills and knowledge pertinent to the industry can severely compound their investment risk.1 These potential station owners suffer the most from the absence of a comprehensive industry tool for evaluating purchase criteria. Without proper financial insights, the neophyte buyer is at the mercy of the seller who has at least three years broadcast experience. In addition, the seller receives a differential advantage from media brokers who get a commission based on the selling price.2 Successful buying, therefore, lies in the preparation of a sound financial plan. Ideally, the plan will serve two purposes. First, future benefits of the purchase can be determined; investors need to assess both risk and earning potential when contemplating an acquisition. Second, financial forecasts are part of the prospectus used to obtain external capital. A thoughtfully prepared, concise proposal often makes the difference between securing a loan or being rejected. While broadcasting has become a lucrative venture that doesn't always require a great deal of starting capital, it is nevertheless, a volatile and high-risk business. The complexity associated with broadcast acqusition is emphasized by the National Association of Broadcasters, who maintain that a broadcast station "is far from a traditional franchise type business."5 Yet, the trade in radio stations, the IJsual outlet for the first time investor, is steadily increasing. In 1979, 546 commercial stations changed hands for an average station price of $6l4,000. In l975, only 363 stations were sold for an average price of $361,063.6 Although small station investors have relied on banks and seller financing as a way of obtaining external capital, the increase in station trade combined with the increase in station price has strained the availability of traditional equity sources. Financing options for broadcasters are further limited because of two other supply factors. l. Accelerating inflationary factors, coupled with heightened uncertainty with respect to long-term funds markets have reduced availability of fixed rate seller-note financing. 2. Accelerating cost of funds coupled with record loan losses have substantially reduced regional bank availability of fixed rate term loan packages.7 The odds of obtaining suitable financing are greatly increased by having a complete, realistic, and professional presentation. Two major factors are considered by a lender in determining the degree of risk involved with a loan. First, a potential lender evaluates the borrower's ability to generate cash flow for repayment of principal and interest. Second, the potential lender appraises its own ability to recover principal in the event of default. Lenders, therefore, are primarily interested in operational results, both historical and projected, especially cash flow, after debt service.8 Thorough financial planning entails the anticipation of as many of the lender's objections as possible and resolving them in the proposal before they are raised.9 The astute investor will spend considerable time supporting the projections with realistic assumptions. These accurate forecasts aare essential; a borrower has nothing to gain by being overly conservative. At the same time, a borrower, by being 10 too optimistic, will endanger loan opportunities. Statement of Purpose This study attempts to develop and construct a forecasting tool for broadcast investors who, on their own, may not be able to prepare realistic projections of business activity. Radio and television sales, for example, are influenced by supply and demand factors which will cause revenues to fluctuate by seasonal or cyclical trends.11 These trends occur, not only because of limited inventory and seasonal demand, but also because of audience levels which are rarely constant throughout the year. For example, in Buffalo, New York the prime time TV viewing levels peak in February and drop to their lowest level in July.12 Since the determining factor in station profitability is manage- ment,13 forecasting becomes a necessary tool because of the increased operational costs and the fact that the profit margin can be very susceptible to "variations in an increasing sales pattern."14 Table 1. Buffalo Viewership Trends Households Using Television (HUT) July 1982 November 1982 February 1983 May 1983 Monday-Friday 43% 62% 66% 58% 8—11 p.m. SOURCE: Nielsen Station Index, "Buffalo, New York," Viewers in Profile, (Northbrook, IL, A.C. Nielsen Company, May 1983), p. 4. Forecasting models must be able to provide management with realistic projections in the fact of uncertainty. This is especially important, and becomes complicated, because of the various trends associated with the financial elements in broadcasting. Therefore, determining a station's financial value and its earnings ability forces an investor to rethink the basic soundness of an acquisition while supplying valuable financial material for potential lenders. Both prospective owners and financiers need a complete finan- cial package used to make the requisite determination that a project has merit. As an ancillary use, students studying the art of broadcast acquisition will have the opportunity to apply acquisition theories normally covered in formal "lecture" type instruction. Although this thesis will be geared to professionals, the student proficient in elementary managerial finance will find the concepts and principles easy to understand and follow. The tool developed as part of this study, is a computer-based financial planning forecasting model. The program will strive to describe the dynamic behavior of a broadcast station in terms of its future financial health. It can then be used to test financial hypotheses about the property in question. The power of simulation forecasting lies in its ability to predict the behavior of a system without disturbing normal operations. Through the use of forecasting, the prospective station owner is able to prepare projections of property performance, The validity of such an analysis is, of course, directly related to the accuracy of the fore- casting model. Scope of the Study Although the basic financial principles used apply to all areas of the telecommunication industry, this study will focus on, and use as examples, only broadcast station properties. There are several reasons for this: first, the greatest number of transactions occur with radio.15 Second, the Federal Communication Commission's attempt to add more radio stations to the spectrum, combined with the push for low-power television, will create a greater supply of affordable broadcast outlets. There are also some inherent limitations associated with this study. Due to the complex nature of broadcast acquisition, the model cannot be all inclusive. A station's financial forecast does not give an accurate indication of a market's (or station's) complete potential. Investors must also prepare a comprehensive market analysis. In some situations the market analysis should be prepared before the station financial analysis.16 A potential investor must consider market variables such as: total advertising dollars, total retail sales, consumer spendable dollars, media competition and industrial stability. The inability of the proposed study to accommodate a subjective station analysis is another limitation of this study. The prospective owner must decide if a format needs changing or if personnel should be replaced. Affiliation and other contracts have to be evaluated along with the physical station property. Major replacement costs may be incurred causing a disruption in the financial plan. Although no program can take the place of thorough acquisition planning, this simulation model will alleviate some of the financial uncertainties. It will help investors answer questions about a station's earning potential and give them help in determining the proper structure for financing. Reviewing a station's present standing is only part of the invest- ment analysis. Prudent investors need to develop long-range financial plans and goals. Many troubles associated with financing and profit- ability reflect poor and/or inappropriate preparation. The blame, however, cannot lie solely with the investor inexperienced in station acquisition. Without a tool for broadcast investment analysis, they may not be able to avoid the financial pitfalls encountered when buying 17 a station. CHAPTER I--NOTES 1 Ward L. Quaal and James A. Brown, Broadcast Management, 2nd ed. (New York: Hastings House Publishers, l976), p. 281. 2 Stephen J. Sansweet, "How to Buy Your Own Radio Station," The Green Pages (l978), pp. 54-55. 3 National Association of Broadcasters, Purchasing a Broadcast Station: A Buyer's Guide (Washington: National Association of Broadcasters, 1978), p. 12. 4 Kay D. Ingle, "Radio Entrepreneurs Fill the Airways," Venture (l979), pp. 62-63. 5 National Association of Broadcasters, Purchasing a Broadcast Station: A Buyer's Guide, (May 1978), p. 2. 6 Barry J. Dickstein, "'True' Station Value is Key Ingredient in Broadcast Financing," roadcast Financial Journal 10 (March l98l), p. 16. 7 Ibid. 8 National Association of Broadcasters, Purchasing a Broadcast Station: A Buyer's Guide, (May l978), p. 12. 9 Lee Hague, "Acquisition Financing: An Overview Update," Broadcast Financial Journal, 8 (March 1979), p. 2l. 10 Ibid. 11 Robert E. Yadon, "Application of Forecasting Techniques to the Telecommunication Industry," (Department of Telecommunication, College of Communication Arts and Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 1980), p. 7. 12 Nielsen Station Index, "Buffalo, New York," Viewers in Profile, (Northbrook, IL, A.C. Nielsen Company, May l983), p. 4. 13 Ward L. Quaal and James A. Brown, Broadcast Management, p. 293. 14 Ibid., p. 304. l5 C. David Ungruhe, "A Comparative Analysis of the Communications Media," Valuation Reporter (First Quarter, 1979). 16 National Association of Broadcasters, Purchasing a Broadcast Station: A Bgyer's Guide, p. 36. l7 Harold Poole, "What's Your Station Worth?" Broadcast Financial Journal, 8 (March l979), pp. 10—12. CHAPTER II REVIEW OF LITERATURE The massive amount of work done in corporate modeling concerns the ongoing dynamics of the firm, not acquisition financing. It should be noted that there is a long history of both simulation model- ing in general and forecasting simulation in particular, especially since the advent and widespread use of the digital computer. An examination of corporate and financial models as well as articles relating to telecommunication acquisition suggest that the application of simulation technology to telecommunication investment analysis is appropriate and desirable, yet often lacks a comprehensive method of accurately projecting such items as revenues, which are an integral part of acquisition financing. This chapter begins with a review of various discussions relating to the role and application of forecasting simulation in business. The chapter concludes with a broader discussion of telecommunication acquisition models which provide insight into the decision making process involved in acquisition financing. After reviewing these models it becomes evident that what they lack is a quantitative fore- casting component which reflects the ongoing dynamics of various financial elements. 10 11 ForecastinggSimulation Makridakis and Wheelwright suggest that the major role of fore- casting "is to aid in assessing various future alternatives and the levels of risk and return that are associated with each of them, so that managers can effectively address this dilemma."2 The authors also stress that forecasting is not just a statistical technique, but an integral part of sociology, politics, economics and psychology. A simple framework has been proposed to categorize forecasting possibilities to help managers develop guidelines and act as a reference point for planning applications.3 Table 2. Forecasting Possibilities Implicit Explicit Estimating the sales of Using a monthly meeting of Intuitive Product A for the coming senior management to develop month in an intuitive, ad forecasts for Product A for hoc manner. the next month. Predicting the sales of Obtaining monthly forecasts Formal Product A for the coming for each major product group month using a statistical on a specified date for use forecasting method. in production planning. SOURCE: Spyros Makridakis and Steven C. Wheelwright, The Handbook of Forecasting: A Manager's Guide (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1982), p. 5. "Intuitive" forecasting consists of internal processes to planners with regard to subjective and judgemental estimating procedures. "Formal" methods, on the other hand, may be slightly more accurate than intuitive procedures. Formal methods can be written down and provide 12 similar results regardless of the user. The "implicit" column refers to forecasts which are not part of plans or decisions being made. This is true even for formal procedures which would not be part of specific plans or actions. Conversely, "explicit" forecasting methods attempt to clearly define the value of the forecast and use it in the decision making process.4 Makridakis and Wheelwright emphasize that forecasting procedures usually begin on the intuitive and implicit level then move toward formal explicit techniques. This systematic approach often leads to "significant improvement in forecasting performance" which allows decision makers to better understand future uncertainties and evaluate the 5 associated levels of risk. Forecastigg Procedures A discussion of the selection of proper forecasting procedures is provided by Fildes who proposes that forecasting choices are based on a broad range of considerations: 1. Prior Beliefs of the Forecaster--The forecaster is likely to be influenced by past experiences and related research with which the forecaster feels comfortable. 2. How the Forecast is to be Used-~The methods employed will be directed toward an expected goal. 3. Complexity and Comprehensiveness--When the model is too complicated it probably won't be used because it won't be understood. However, the model must include all pertinent elements or the forecast will not accomplish required goals. 4. Cqmprehensive Testing--Several parallel models ought to be 13 6 developed and used to test the primary model's performance. Fildes breaks down the methods of forecasting into three broad classes: The judgmental-~where individual Opinions are processed, perhaps in a complicated fashion. The extrapolative--where forecasts are made for a particular variable using only that variable's past history. The patterns identified in the past are assumed to hold over to the future. The causal (or structural)--where an attempt is made to identify relationships between variables that have held in the past, for example, volume of brand sales and that product's relative price. The relationships are then assumed to hold into the future.7 Most techniques use more than just one of the above approaches, while most models tend to include parts of all these methods. More specifically, Hanke and Reitsch list four basic steps in developing a forecasting procedure: Data collection Data reduction or condensation Model building Model extrapolation (the actual forecast) #(JONH Although these steps are geared to statistical methods of forecasting, Hanke and Reitsch do not diminish the importance of intuitive methods for predicting the future in an attempt to reduce risk and uncertainty. They propose that quantitative techniques should supplement the "gut" feelings, common sense, and management ability of decision makers. Forecasting, then, is useful if it reduces uncertainty while resulting in informed decisions that have increased value over and 9 above the cost required to produce the forecast. 14 Sullivan and Claycombe sum up forecasting as: "A blend of science and art that defies precise definition for a successful application. Preparation of a forecast entails more than just using historical data and mathematical formulas to project into the future. The key to realistic forecasting is the inclusion of informed judgement and intuition into the methodological framework being employed in order to minimize uncertainty associated with the future development, or event, in question." Telecommunication Acquisition Models Chapman and Associates, a national media brokerage firm, currently uses a computer program for broadcast station investment analysis. The program is lauded by Chapman as a time saving device giving the brokers and investors pertinent financial data along with projections of financial activity.11 The program utilizes nine financial variables in the calculations. They are: income, expense, profit or loss, loan principal payment, loan interest payment, leverage factors, the depreciation schedule, covenants not to compete, and the appreciation factor. The program makes financial assumptions about each variable and takes into account the variable's effect on each other. The naive financial assumptions used are based on static percentages. For example, the fixed expenses may be set to increase by six percent over a ten-year pro forma period, while the sales figure automatically increases by nine percent. This shows growth occurring in an exponential manner year to year when, in fact, this growth should be linear. Month to month or quarter to quarter variables, on the other hand, usually change exponentially. 15 The output from the program includes a pro forma profit and loss statement, a ten-year cash flow analysis, a return on investment analysis which incorporates an analysis of return on down payment, return on total payments, and a return on purchase price. The broker or analyst takes the outputs and evaluates them with the client to determine if the results fall into line with the goals and needs of the investor. There are several advantages to the Chapman model. The most obvious is the freedom to utilize the buyer's preference for a certain type of investment analysis. For example, the program can accommodate the buyer who wants to consider the purchase “in terms of a multiple of cash flow, a "time-gross" formula, or a return on investment analysis. Like the "TEEM" model to be discussed, the Chapman program relies on the insights and experience of the broker to evaluate the results of the financial analysts. A significant problem with the program is its reliance on a set percentage rate to estimate growth. There is no allowance for seasonal trends or more cyclical variations such as the quadrennial effect associated with the broadcast industry (a jump in revenue every four years due to the national elections and Olympics). The article does not discuss. the basis of the financial assumptions. How were they derived? How reliable are they? How are the changes and shifts in the marketplace evaluated? Additional methods, like risk and ratio analysis are also missing from the Chapman program. Another non-computerized method for valuing a station is used by analyst David Schutz. Schutz emphasizes profitability as the key factor in station valuation.12 The prices paid for a station, according to Schutz reflect the future earnings that they will likely generate. 16 The difficulty for the buyer is in the determination of the future earnings. An extensive market analysis is used to aid in the determination of station value. The variables which are part of the market analysis include the total market advertising revenues, disposable income, total retail sales, and advertising competition. The buyer is advised to ascertain the vitality of the market which should reflect the potential of the station in question. The most interesting component of the Schutz analysis is the subjective evaluation of the station and a comparison of theoretical versus actual audience share. The variables used in this mathematical evaluation of theoretical (or potential) share are based on such factors as power, frequency, and hours of operation. Schutz uses a hypothetical market to illustrate the method of obtaining the theoretical share (Table 3). A comparison can then be made between actual and theoretical shares to see if the station is performing "better" or "worse" than technical conditions suggest it "should" (Table 4). Schutz estimates that if a station is within 20 percent of its theoretical share, it is considered normal."14 This kind of analysis is beneficial to a potential owner who is then able to look at a station with a poor actual share (compared to the theoretical share) and determine if the problem is indicative of poor management. Likewise a station might be doing better than it should indicating that little can be done in the way of improvement. This idea of earning potential and sound management is discussed by Schutz in the close of the article. 17 . . .ew .a .Am~m_ »_=qv 6H .ocagwmcwo:M\acmEmowcoz ammoumocm =.:wmocmm m xppmwm :owpmum wasp m~= .Npasom .m cw>ma "mumzom .mcwcczoc on one pcmucwa ooH Page“ “on ou mmcmgm .o.H m>_momc mesa; umumswpca sow: meowumum mp_;3 m. m>mmuoc meowamum mswuxmo .o.H m>wmomc mcomumum z; .A~:¥ cm .cmcw ccwumpm\omofiv\ mwmmn wzp co apco mcowamum z< ou umw_nn< .Lmasac m_o;z ummcmm: op umuczoc use Aooo.fl\cmzon :owumumyx mo mwmmn on» :o emuaasoum .mmmmmpo m>wpumnmmc any we meowumom com zpmscoc= uwcmcwmcoo mm: “L mocmm ucmsummcu mumcwnmm cm>wa coma we: we: “Lava; mccmucm mcowumum 2; mo mmmo on» cm MQ'LD H mnmm mucaoa Peach GAS .mqm. a,“ o.H N coo.m coo.m ~.mm m wmfi 0.6 o.H o.~ N coo.m ooo.m m.¢m o Nfim o.m o.H o.~ m ooo.- ooo.m~ n.mo~ u §NH m.~ o.~ a. fi omm ooo.~ ommfi mug: &om w.¢ o.H w. m ooo.~ ooo.o~ oomH m xmfi m.~ m. m.H H -o- ooo.~ owe < mgmsm mucwoa cowumcmqo Xucmscmcd cmzoa ugmwz xmo A~:z\~:¥v cowumum m _muoh a mo mesa: m Amuumzv cmzom xocmaamcd _ Boxes: Pmawuaeuoasz cw meowpmpm owuam Lo esteem“ gem accomws .m 6_nac mH 18 Table 4. Comparison Between Audience Shares and Theoretical Shares 2 Net Weekly 1 Audience Theoretical Circulation Share Share A 31,300 13% 12% B 60,100 25% 20% WDES 26,500 11% 12% D 45,700 19% 21% E 38,400 16% 17% F 38,500 16% 17% Total 240,500 100% 1 In place of Net Weekly Circulation, Average Quarter Hour Audience (6:00 a.m.-midnight, Mon.-Sun.) could be used. 2 From Table 3. SOURCE: David E. Schutz, "Is That Station Really a Bargain," Broadcast Management/Engineering, 14 (July 1978), p. 84. 19 Your success as a station owner will not be determined solely by your ability to acquire a station at a low price. Instead it will be determined by your ability to run your station efficiently and effectively.15 The final telecommunication acquisition model considered here was developed by Wagner, Akutagawa, and Cuneo (1969). The Telecommunica- tions Earning Estimation Model (TEEM) was designed for the Security Analysts of Wells Fargo Bank. TEEM is a probabilistic model used to derive an earnings estimate for a company by means of simulation. The model was built to assist an operating analyst in simulating the expected financial behavior of one company at a time, one year at a time.16 The operating income statement and the funds flow statement provide the framework over which TEEM operates. The analyst, not the model, is responsible for the accuracy of the financial estimates used in the calculations. The analyst has the option of accepting a system- generated estimate of earnings, or the analyst can replace it with one he or she has generated. In other words, the estimates used in the model are only advisory to the analyst. The output of the program includes standard financial statements with a built-in probability distribution expressed as "Pessimistic," "Most Likely," and "Optimistic." The range is arbitrarily set at two standard deviations from the "Most Likely" parameter. TEEM is not applicable to this Taaper because it cannot be used as a training tool for inexperienced investors. It relies too heavily on the implicit knowledge of a seasoned analyst who makes similar investment decisions as part of everyday business. What TEEM did was to speed-up the process of investment analysis. The program did not give the analyst any new information and was weak in the sense that the 20 analyst had the option of overriding most variable assumptions. These shortcomings were so prevalent, that the authors considered TEEM some- what of a failure. Although it was introduced to over 100 analysts, no one elected to use it.'7 To investigate the reasons for its failure, the authors studied the reliability of the model. Their study showed that the model did not outperform the estimates of the analysts, the very people it was designed to help. 21 CHAPTER II--NOTES 1 Robert C . Meier, William T. Newell, and Harold L. Pazer, Simulation in Business and Economics (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1969), p. 1. 2 Spyros Makridakis and Steven C. Wheelwright, The Handbook of Forecasting: A Manager's Guide (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1982), p. 7. 3 Ibid., p. 5 4 Ibid. 5 Ibid. 6 Robert Fildes, "Forecasting: The Issues," The Handbook of Forecasting: A Manager's Guide, ed. Spyros Makridakis and Steven C. Wheelwright (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1982), pp. 89-90. 7 Ibid., p. 92. 8 John E. Hanke and Arthur G. Reitsch, Business Forecasting (Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, Inc., 1981), p. 4. 9 William G. Sullivan and W. Wayne Claycombe, Fundamentals of Forecasting (Reston, VA: Reston Publishing Company, Inc., 1977), p. 2. 10 Ibid., PP. 1-2. 22 11 Chapman & Associates, "Using a Computer for Investment Analysis," Broadcast Financial Journal 7 (January 1978). 12 David E. Schutz, "Is That Station Really a Bargain?," Broadcast Management/Engineering, 14 (July 1978), p. 82. 13 Ibid., p. 87. 14 David E. Schutz, "Is That Station Really a Bargain?, Part II." Broadcast Management/Engineering 14 (August 1978), p. 86. 15 Ibid., p. 38. 16 Albert N. Schrieber, ed., Corporate Simulation Models(Seattle, WA: University of Washington, 1970), pp. 396—399. 17 Ibid., p. 416. CHAPTER III FORECASTING METHODOLOGY Introduction Successful buying of telecommunication properties, as stated in Chapter 1, lies in the preparation of a sound financial plan. The plan will determine possible future benefits of the purchase and secondly, financial forecasts are used in the prospectus required by lending institutions. This chapter will explore methods of financial forecasting which, when used by potential investors, should provide projections of earning ability. These predictions of future events can be obtained by discovering patterns of events in the past.1 Forecasting Defined Having the ability to make decisions based on information which predicts uncontrollable business events should give management an improved choice of options while attempting to reduce risk. Fore- casting is the prediction of future events with the intent of reducing the risk involved in decision making. While usually wrong, the infor- mation from the forecasting process is used to improve the decision making process.2 23 24 There are basically two types Of forecasting. The first involves "qualitative" estimations Of future events. This subjective method relies on the Opinions Of experts who use various tools such as marketing tests, customer surveys, sales force estimates and historical data. Decisions are based on "Opinions."3 The second basic type Of forecasting revolves around "quantitative" methods which use procedures that explicitly define how the forecast is determined. The Operations are mathematical in nature with the logic clearly stated. Quantitative forecasting examines historical data to determine the underlying process generating the values Of each variable and, assuming this process follows some stable pattern, using the information to extrapolate the process into the future.4 Although business decisions must be based on both qualitative and quantitative information, this study is the formulation Of an analytical tool for potential investors through the use Of a computer which relies on quantitative data. Therefore, only statistical fore- casting procedures will be explored. Forecasting Components Patterns Operational variables such as revenues and expenses change over time and follow some sort Of pattern. All forecasting methods assume that a pattern or relationship exists which can be uncovered, identified and used as the basis for preparing a forecast. An effective forecasting procedure depends on matching a pattern with 25 a particular technique that can handle and project that pattern into the future.5 There are four common patterns that are considered the most important. These patterns can be found alone or in combination. The first basic pattern is "horizontal" or "stationary" in nature and does not increase or decrease in any systematic way (Figure 3-1). The average mean value Of the data remains constant. On the other hand, a "seasonal" pattern exists where a series Of values fluctuate according to some seasonal factor or factors (Figure 3-2). Lawn mower sales is an example of a seasonal series. A "cyclical" pattern is very similar to a seasonal pattern but the length Of the cycle is generally longer than one year (Figure 3-3). This particular type Of fluctuation is Often the most difficult to predict because it doesn't repeat itself at constant invervals Of time. Finally, when there is a general increase or decrease in a value over time, the fluctuation follows a "trend" 6 pattern (Figure 3-4). Time Elements Forecasting patterns involve the mapping Of some variable over time. When used in forecasting, the variable time consists Of three separate elements. The first is the basic unit Of time for which the forecasts are made called the forecast "period." The period can be a week, month, quarter, year, or whatever length of time makes sense to the problem at hand. The forecasting "horizon" is the length of time (or "lead-time") in the future for which the forecast is made. The forecast could be done for a year broken down by months. In this case, the period is a month and the horizon is a year. Finally, 26 :cmuuma name came» .vum mczmwd as. k 2.: ___1« assasooosznONo-o .H — q _ H fl _ W ccmupma mama FmOPFOxu .m-m wcamwd «Err A1 033.2. 3880“. ccwuuma mama _mcomwmm .~-m mgamwd «B. :2 22 $2 seamsmmmiummzumm 8.:q____q______q__q .325, 80980... cgmppma mums FouconLo: .Flm mczawd 0:... h A :32 0335 > 3380 m 27 the period over which each new forecast is prepared, is called the forecast "interval." The forecast interval is Often the same as the period which means the forecast is revised each period using the most current data point to update the forecast.7 When the forecast is revised each period and the horizon or lead- time remains constant, the forecast is Operating on a "moving horizon" basis. For example, if the problem involves forecasting monthly sales for the next year on a continual basis, the period and interval would be a month and the moving horizon would be a year. SO as each month's data is received, the lead-time is moved ahead by 12 months. The fore- cast usually becomes less accurate when the forecast lead-time is increased. In other words, the shorter the lead-time, the quicker 8 the forecast model can react to error. Forecasting Methods Forecasting systems use both quantitative and qualitative methods Of analysis. The statistical methods lend Objectivity to the system and quantify historical trends. Forecasts done by statistical methods become another piece Of information used by financial managers prior to 9 making decisions. Montgomery and Johnson list eight factors which contribute to the selection Of appropriate forecasting methods: Form of forecast required. Forecast horizon, period, and interval. Data availability. Accuracy required. Behavior Of process being forecast (demand pattern). Cost Of development, installation, and operation. ONU‘I-DwN-d 28 7. Ease Of operation. 10 8. Management comprehension and cooperation. Since this study concentrates on the quantitative methods Of forecasting, qualitative considerations will not be discussed. First, a brief description Of general forecasting models will be presented followed by a discussion of several common interactive forecasting methods which range from the basic regression methods through the more complex exponential smoothing methods including Winters' Method which takes into account seasonal trends. Forecasting Models There are two basic models used in forecasting: "time-series" and "causal" models. Very simply, a time-series is a time ordered sequence Of Observations Of a variable. A time-series analysis uses values Of a variable over time in order to develop a model for pre- dicting the future such as revenues over months Of a year.11 Causal models examine the relationship Of the primary variable and other time-series. An example Of a causal model would be the correlation Of revenues with share of audience. There are two limitations to the use Of causal models. First, the independent variable, in this case share Of audience, must be known at the time Of forecasting revenues. Since the share Of audience cannot be explicitly known in advance, the entire projection for revenue is tainted. The second. drawback to the use Of causal models involves the complex nature Of 12 the forecast in terms of the amount Of computation and data handling. Therefore, this study will concentrate on the various methods Of time- series analysis that have a direct application to broadcasting. 29 Regression Simple regression utilizes the "line of best fit" by plotting the dependent variable, say revenues, over the independent variable time and drawing a straight line through the middle Of the data points.13 The Object Of regression is to arrive at an equation for the line through the data which minimizes the squared differences between the line and the actual data.14 In this method the key variable (revenue) is directly dependent upon the independent variable (time). Simply put, the variable revenues increases or decreases at the same rate every period. 15 The equation for simple regression is: Y = A + B * Y (1) Where: A--is the "Y intercept" which is the value Of the line when X = O. B--is the regression coefficient and indicates how much the value Of Y changes when the value Of X changes one unit. B is also called the "slope" of the line. Y--is the dependent variable for which the equation is being solved. X-—is the independent variable (time). 30 A and B are the "parameters" Of the equation and must be solved for by using the method Of least squares in such a way that the sum Of squared errors is minimized. In other words, the deviations above the "line" will exactly Offset the deviations below the "line."16 B = N*2XY - X*2Y ( ) 2 N*2X2 - (2X)2 A = ZY - B*£X '_N_ N (3) Where: N--is the number Of data points. The most Obvious disadvantage to the use Of regression analysis in forecasting is the fact that not all data points fall on the regression line and the data points may take the form Of a cyclical or seasonal pattern which is not accounted for by using linear regression methods.17 Another disadvantage to the use Of regression forecasts is that the forecast cannot be updated when new data points become available. If new estimates for the parmeters are needed, an entire new set Of data points must be used.18 Simple Moving Averages In general, moving average techniques attempt to eliminate randomness in a time-series. The goal is to distinguish between the random fluctuations and the basic underlying pattern in the historical data. This Objective is achieved by averaging ("smoothing") the historical values in order to eliminate the extreme values in the sequence. The forecast is then based on the smoothed value.19 31 The technique Of "simple (or single) moving averages" takes a set Of historical values, finding their average and then using that average as the forecast for the upcoming period. The number of data points used in the averaging procedure (N) is determined by the Operator 20 Since the key variable tO be forecast can change and remains constant. slowly over time, it would make sense that the more recent Observations in the historical trend should hold more weight than observations in the distant past. ‘Because Of this, only the most current data points might be used allowing the model tO react to data shifts. This is where the "moving" concept comes into play. As each new data point becomes available, the Oldest is discarded. The formula for an N-period simple moving average is:21 St = Xt-l I Xt-Z 1 °°' 1 Xt-N N (4) Where: St—-is the forecast for period t. Xt--is the actual value at period t. N--is the number Of values used in the average. Since the formula averages only the last N values, if N is increased the model is less sensitive to variations and takes longer to adjust to data shifts. Conversely, a small N reacts quickly to change but may force the model tO react to random variations which are not part Of the underlying data pattern.22 32 Double Moving Averages For data with a linear or quadratic trend the single moving average procedure would produce misleading forecasts because the projection would "lag" behind the data shifts. TO correct for this 23 The double moving average lag; a; "double moving average" is used. is simply the average of the single moving average. The double moving average treats the single moving average as a single data point. The formula for an N-period double moving average is:24 . III III III Mt|2l Mt + Mt_1 + ... + Mt N (5) N Note: The [2| refers to double moving average, not the squared value. Likewise the III is the single moving average. The forecast equation is then: Yt+x = At + Bt*X (This is the regression equation) ' (6) 1 2 _ ZMtl I - Mtl I (7) > I Where: B ='(_N'E_1—)*(Mt'l' ' Mt'z') (8) The primary advantage Of moving average techniques over regression is that the forecast can be quickly revised with a smaller number Of calculations as each new data point is received“ Secondly, this procedure allows the forecaster to place more weight on current data rather than treating all data with equal importance. This also minimizes data storage since only the most recent N values are used in the averaging.25 33 There are, however, disadvantages to moving average forecasting procedures. These have to do with the basic premise Of the techniques, which assumes that the trends and patterns will continue into the future. An erratic data point which breaks the norm could be the start Of a new shift in the data or it could be a "freak" value that would throw the entire forecast Off balance. Another limitation to moving averages is that the technique gives equal weight to each of the last N Observations. NO weight is given to the discarded values. While it is preferable to weight the current values more heavily, it may not be advantageous tO completely disregard past Observations.26 The next section addresses this problem by describing techniques which focus attention on recent values without ignoring past data points. Single Exponential Smoothing Developed within the past 25 years, exponential smoothing techniques have become popular due tO their simplicity, computational efficiency, reasonable accurateness, and the fact that they require only a few data points to produce forecasts.27 Like averaging techniques, smoothing procedures can be used for simple linear trends with more random or seasonal trends. "Single exponential smoothing" is based on averaging (smoothing) past data points in a decreasing (exponential) manner.28 The new estimate is Obtained by modifying the Old estimate by some fraction Of the fore- cast error which results from the previous estimate. In other words, the error between the actual and the forecasted value for the current 34 period is used for correcting the forecast for the upcoming period. The fraction used in the correction is generally denoted by the Greek letter Alpha (a), called the "smoothing constant." The general formula for single exponential smoothing is:29 S = OXt + (l-O)S t+1 t Where: St--is the exponentially smoothed value in period t. a--is the smoothing contant. Xt--is the actual value at period t. If the equation for St is expanded by substituting the equation for St’ the equation then becomes: S OX + (l-O) (OX t+1 t (10) 1 + (l-O) S t- t-l) )2 OX 'tO(1-O) Xt-l + (l-O S t t-l When the new equation includes the formula for St-l the above equation becomes: 2 x + 6(1-6)3 xt_ + S = (xx + (1-0.) X 3 t+1 t + O(1-O) t-l t-Z and so on ... (11) The above equation shows that decreasing weights are given to Older Observations. Another form Of the equation is: S = S + O X -S (12) t+1 t ( t t) This formula is simply the Old forecast St plus 6 times the error (Xt - S Montgomery and Johnson refer to this equation in their t)° 35 definition Of moving averages which is: "a procedure that adjusts the smoothed statistic by an amount that is proportional tO the most recent forecast error."3O Double Exponential Smoothing In the same way that the single moving average technique showed signs Of "lag," the single exponential smoothing model also lags behind 31 The double exponential the true value when forecasting a linear trend. smoothing model is completely analogous to double moving averages in that we can add to the single exponential smoothing value the difference between this value and the double exponential smoothing value and then adjust for the trend:32 A) s (1): x +(1-)s|1| (13) t a t “ t-l lg) [1| 121 B) St = OSt + (l-O) St-l (14) Like double moving averages, the forecast for double exponential smoothing is: st+x = At + Bt x (15) At = zsill- 512' (16) B: = 'fi3;‘ (s11:ll - 512') (17) Note: |2| refers to second order exponential smoothing, not the squared value. 36 Where: a--is the smoothing constant. X--is the number Of periods ahead to be forecasted. Double exponential smoothing can handle a trend pattern better than single exponential smoothing because it reacts more quickly to the shift in the data values. The forecast follows the trend more closely and eliminates the problems with lag. Triple Exponential Smoothing If the underlying pattern Of the data is curved rather than linear, the double exponential smoothing technique becomes inadequate.33 Exponential smoothing can be expanded to estimate coefficients in polynomials Of any degree. Triple exponential smoothing techniques carry the general formulas into the next higher polynomial. The formula for triple exponential smoothing and the resulting forecast are:34 131. l2! I3] St - OSt + (l-a) St-l (18) v = A + B x = c x2 (19) t+X t t t - Ill I21 I31 At — 35t - 3st + st (20) B = 01‘ ((6-56)S 1' l - 2 (5-4,)5 '2 1+ (4-3,)sl3l) (21) t 2 t t t 2(l-O) 2 ct = a (st)1| - 2542' + 543' ) (22) (1-a12 Note: I2] and |3| refer to the second and third order exponential smoothing not squared or cubed values. 37 As mentioned, the exponential smoothing procedures are Often more desirable than moving averages because they only require a few data points to generate a forecast while the moving averages require the storage and handling Of N data points. Secondly, the exponential smoothing models do not "discard" Older values, they just give less weight to Observations in the past. Before moving to more advanced forecasting models, two concepts should be addressed which are integral parts Of exponential smoothing procedures. They are model initialization and the choice Of an appropriate smoothing constant. Model Initialization Initial values are needed for all types Of exponential smoothing. The number and type Of initial values depends on the type Of smoothing employed. The need for initialization arises only when smoothing is used for the first time. Even then, the problem is more theoretical than real.35 The reason for initialization can be seen by examining the smoothing formula: St+1 = OXt + (fl-(1)51; (23) Where: Xt--is the most recent value. St--is the latest forecast. St+1--is the forecast for the next period. 38 When T = 1: $2 = 6X1 + (l-a)S1 In order to solve for 52, S1 must be known. The value Of S1 should have been S1 = 6X0 + (1-6)SO. It can be seen that XO does not exist and SO cannot be found. In other words, 51 must be supplied in order to solve for $2. The problem arises in that 51 cannot be found in the data.36 Makridakis and Wheelwright suggest three approaches to arrive at initialized values, assuming past data exists. First, the fore- caster could separate the data into two parts using the first to estimate the initial values and the second to estimate and check optimal parameter values. A second approach involves the technique of back forecasting. This approach inverts the data and starts the estimating procedure from the most recent value and ending with the Oldest value. What this does is provide parameter values and/or forecasts for the beginning Of the data. These are then used as the initialized values when the data is forecast in a normal (beginning to end) sequence. Finally, the least squares method can be used. For instance, in single exponential smoothing, 51 can be found by averaging the past N observations. For linear forms Of exponential smoothing, A1 and B1 can be found by using the straight line equation to Obtain Al (the intercept) and B1 (the slope) and using these as the starting parameter values.37 When there are no past values, the forecaster can either wait for data points or arbitrarily specify the initial values based on 39 common sense. Another arbitrary way Of assigning a value to S1 is to make it equal to X1 and then start the forecasting.38 Choice Of a Smoothing Constant The selection Of the appropriate smoothing constant along with the choice Of the proper smoothing technique are the two most critical decisions made by the forecaster. These decisions will determine whether the forecasting process is a success or failure. The smoothing constant (a) is critical because it is the control factor in determining the number Of past Observations that influence the forecast. Small values result in a slow response to data shifts because significant weight is given tO many past Observations. Conversely, the larger constant gives weight only to the most recent values which causes the system to react more rapidly to shifts in the data.39 A rule Of thumb is to have the constant fall between 0.01 and 0.30.40 In general, if the underlying data pattern seems to remain fairly constant, a small a should be used. Likewise, frequent and dramatic shifts in the data ought tO be handled by using a larger smoothing constant so the model can react quickly to the changes. This, however, is precisely why the forecaster should proceed with caution in choosing the constant. A tOO small valuefbr'the smoothing constant prevents the model from responding quickly to a shift in the underlying pattern. Yet, a constant that reacts very quickly could respond to a random Observation which is not indicative Of the basic pattern.41 Although there is really nO explicit rule for arriving at an apprOpriate constant, several approaches can aid the forecaster in 40 making an educated choice. One such approach is to arrive at a smoothing constant which will give similar results found in moving averages. The formula is:42 O= 2 N+l Where: N--is the same number Of data points used in moving averages. Another technique would be to go through several iterations using different constants in the exponential smoothing formula and making a measure of effectiveness such as minimum sum Of squared errors. Alternatively, if there are 36 data points available, a forecast could be done using a particular constant on the first 24 Observations and comparing the results tO the actual values in periods 25 through 36. Winters' Method Of Exponential Smoothing Many data sets, such as beer sales, broadcast revenues, or toy sales can exhibit seasonal influences in addition to linear trends. The previously mentioned exponential smoothing procedures control for randomness and adjust for trends but they do not take into account seasonality. Winters' Method is similar to double or triple exponential smoothing but includeserladditional parameter which adjusts for seasonal shifts in the data.43 There are four basic equations needed to arrive at a forecast using Winters' Method:44 41 1. Estimate the current intercept: X A,c = 6(Ft_ ) + (1-6) (At-1+ Bt-l) t-n 2. Estimate the lepe: Bt = em, - Am) + u-s) 3H (25) 3. Solve for the updated seasonal factor: X _ t Ft - 6(AZ) + (l—o) Ft-N (26) 4. Forecast for T periods ahead: Yt+T = (At + BtT) F (27) Where: Xt-—is the observation at period t. At--is the estimate Of the intercept Of the trend line at t. Bt--is the estimate Of the slope Of the trend line at t. N -- is the number Of Observations comprising periodicity Of the data. Ft--is the estimate of the multiplicative seasonal factor at period t. Ft_N--is the estimate Of the seasonal factor N periods in the past. F -- is used to denote the best estimate Of the seasonal factor in period t+T. 6,6,o--are the smoothing constants. 42 The values for the smoothing constants in Winters' Method are arrived at in the same general manner as a was in exponential smoothing. However, with three constants, which can be used in many different combinations, the task Of arriving at Optimum values is far more difficult. The iterative process Of forming different combinations of a, 8 and 0 would be computationally exhausting and near impossible tO dO without the aid Of an Optimizing routine in a computer forecasting model. Without such an aid the forecaster is forced to arbitrarily assign values that lie between 0.01 and 0.30 as was done in exponential smoothing. Box-Jenkins There are other forecasting models beside the ones previously mentioned which are useful in particular situations. One such method is the Box-Jenkins approach tO time-series analysis which is a powerful tool for providing accurate short-range forecasts. The methods and formulas which are part Of the Box-Jenkins procedure are far tOO complicated to be included in this study. More importantly this method, which combines the strengths of autoregressive models with moving average techniques, has several drawbacks. First, a large amount Of data is required to complete the computa- tions. For instance, at least 72 data points are needed tO forecast seasonal data in a 12-month horizon. The model works best with many Observations over a short period such as daily stock prices. Secondly, there is nO easy way tO update the model with new data, which is a strength Of smoothing methods. The model must be completely refitted with the new data in order to update the forecast. This makes the cost Of Operating the model prohibitive. Finally, the methodology is more 43 difficult to understand and the results are more difficult to comprehend than in other methods.45 Evaluation of Forecasts Referring back to the basic definition Of forecasting, one finds the ideas Of uncertainty and randomness prevalent throughout the discussion. Because this uncertainty exists in an uncontrollable situation, randomness will always be present. Forecasting attempts to minimize the uncertainty by minimizing the difference between the forecasted value and the actual value.46 This difference, called "forecast error" should not, however, be considered a negative aspect Of the forecasting situation. It should be considered a given and used for its advantages. Because Of the wide range Of forecasting procedures, performance evaluation is essential. Forecast error is used to measure this performance.47 The first step in model evaluation is to define error, which is simply the difference between the actual value and the predicted value. This error is then statistically manipulated to provide different measures Of reliability. One of the most basic is the measure Of error dispersion around the mean, called the "standard deviation" and the squared value called "variance." The formula for standard deviation 48 (Y-Y )2 s =\/———————2 R (28) N --1 is: 44 Where: Y--is the actual value. YR--is the forecasted value. N--is the number Of conservations. If there are several residuals which differ greatly from the mean (usually two standard deviations), the forecasting procedure can be considered suspect in closely following the trends.49 Another measure Of error is to take the absolute value Of the error value and compute the average (mean) error. This technique is called the "mean absolute deviation" (MAD). A similar alternative is to compute the "mean square error" (MSE). The MSE is Obtained by squaring each error and finding the mean Of the squared values. An advantage to using the MSE criterion is its ability to penalize the forecast more for large deviations than small ones. For instance, an error Of 2.00 is squared and then counts for four times as much error as an error Of 1.00. By attempting tO minimize the mean square error in the forecasting routine, it is assumed that several small errors are more desirable than a few large deviations.50 When several different forecasting techniques are used simultaneously, the Operator must know which procedure handles the data most efficiently. By computing the mean square error for each technique, the Operator can then choose forecasts generated by the procedure which produces the smaller MSE. In this way a multiple forecasting technique can be developed which analyzes different types Of data sets. The Operator then has several techniques ready to use for any data set and does not have tO redesign the entire forecasting system to fit particular variables. In this way the MSE is not just used tO judge how 45 well a forecasting procedure works, but it also allows evaluation between forecasting techniques. 46 CHAPTER III--NOTES 1Spyros Makridakis and Steven Wheelwright, Interactive Forecasting (San Francisco: Holden-Day, Inc., 1978), p. 13. 2Douglas Montgomery and LynwOOd Johnson, Forecasting and Time Series Analysis (New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1976), p. 2. 31bid., p. 7. 4Ibid. 5Steven C. Wheelwright and Spyros Makridakis, Forecasting Methods for Management (New York: John Wiley 8 Sons, 1973), p. 19. 61bid., pp. 19-21. 7Montgomery and Johnson, Forecasting and Time Series Analysis, p. 4. 8Ibid., p. 5. 91bid., p. 8. loIbid., p. 9. 111bid., p. 7. 121bid., p. 8. 13Makridakis and Wheelwright, Interactive Forecasting, p. 120. 14 William G. Sullivan and W. Wayne Claycombe, Fundamentals Of Forecasting (Reston, VA: Reston Publishing Company, Inc., 1977), p. 60. lslbid. 47 16Wheelwright and Makridakis, Forecasting Methods for Management, p. 107. 17Ibid., p. 137. 18Makridakis and Wheelwright, Interactive ForeCasting, p. 121. 19Wheelwright and Makridakis, Forecasting Methods for Management, p. 55. 201616. 211616. 221bid., p. 88. 23Sullivan and Claycombe, Fundamentals Of Forecasting, p. 88. 24Ibid. 251bid., p. 83. 26Wheelwright and Makridakis, Forecastipg Methods for Management, p. 62. 27Makridakis and Wheelwright, Interactive Forecasting, p. 58. 28Ibid. 29Wheelwright and Makridakis, Forecasting Methods for Management, p. 62. 30Montgomery and Johnson, Forecasting and Time Series Analysis, p. 49. 31Ibid., p. 57. 32Wheelwright and Makridakis, Forecasting Methods for Management, pp. 71-72. 48 33Sullivan and Claycombe, Fundamentals of Forecasting, p. 95. 34Ibid., pp. 95—96. 35Wheelwright and Makridakis, Forecasting Methods for Management, p. 80. 36Ibid., p. 79. 37Ibid. 38Ibid. 39 Spyros Makridakis and Steven C. Wheelwright, The Handbook Of Forecasting: A Manager's Guide (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1982), p. 122. 40Montgomery and Johnson, Forecasting and Time Series Analysis, p. 67. 411616. 42Sullivan and Claycombe, Fundamentals of Forecasting, p. 93. 43Wheelwright and Makridakis, Forecasting Methods for Management, p. 73. 44Sullivan and Claycombe, Fundamentals Of ForeCasting, pp. 101-102. 45John E. Hanke and Arthur G. Reitsch, Business Forecasting (Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, Inc., 1981), pp. 306-307. 46Wheelwright and Makridakis, Forecasting Methods for Management, p. 22. 49 47Makridakis and Wheelwright, The Handbook of Forecasting: A Manager's Guide, p. 457. 48Hanke and Reitsch, Business Forecasting, p. 7. 49Wheelwright and Makridakis, Forecasting Methods for Management, p. 112. 501bid., p. 23. CHAPTER IV THE MULTIPLE FORECASTING PROGRAM Introduction This chapter presents a computer program developed to generate multiple forecasts using the following methods Of time-series analysis: 1. Simple Regression Single Moving Average Double Moving Average Single Exponential Smoothing Double Exponential Smoothing Triple Exponential Smoothing \IO‘U'IDOON Winters' Method In addition, the program provides checks Of accuracy using calculations Of variance, standard error and the number Of residuals exceeding two standard deviations. The program also provides a "method analysis" based on the comparison Of mean square error (MSE) generated for each forecasting routine. This method analysis indicates which of the above methods provides the "best" forecast for a particular data set. A data set and manually generated forecasts will be used to validate the methods employed. A computer program using and evaluating the forecasting methods is then introduced which will expand and 50 51 expedite the manual calculations. Finally, resultsobtained by using the computer program with the data set are presented at the end of the chapter. The Data Set In order tO test the application Of time-series techniques to broadcast properties, monthly revenue figures from a Midwest radio station, in a medium-sized market are used. The station is in a market that contains at least five other commercial radio stations which compete for available advertising revenue. Thus, the value Of a program such as this, to forecast future revenues is apparent. Table 5. Monthly Revenues for a Midwest Radio Station. Month Period Revenue Month Period Revenue January 1 $106,794 July 19 $139,617 February 2 116,734 August 20 153,507 March 3 126,114 September 21 148,409 April 4 113,021 October 22 183,845 May 5 119,626 November 23 171,785 June 6 117,485 December 24 176,756 July 7 119,626 January 25 127,109 August 8 112,130 February 26 130,440 September 9 111,678 March 27 140,694 October 10 139,704 April 28 159,302 November 11 135,321 May 29 162,168 December 12 152,337 June 30 158,753 January 13 86,111 July 31 152,182 February 14 105,933 August 32 168,858 March 15 116,682 September 33 157,313 April 16 129,772 October 34 207,745 May 17 157,178 November 35 194,117 June 18 148,367 December 36 180,291 52 Forecasting Routines A sample forecast is manually generated from the data set for each method in order tO validate the forecasting equations used in the computer program. Each method uses the variables "X" to denote the period and "Y" for the observation. The number Of periods used in moving averages (N) has been set at 6. The exponential smoothing constant (a) has been set at 0.15. Simple Regression 1. Calculate the slope (B): £(X*Y) - (X*ZY) 2X2 = (X*zx) 2,024.99 2. Calculate the intercept (A): A = Y - (B*X) 104,976.61 3. Generate the forecast for 12 periods ahead (period 48): YEST A + B * X 104,976.61 + 2,024.99 * 48 $202,175.52 53 Single Moving Average 1. Generate the forecast for the last period (36) and any future period. zY (30 to 35) SMA (36) = N 1,038,968 6 $173,161.33 Double Moving Average 1. Calculate the double moving average using the last N single moving averages (periods 31 to 36): 2. Calculate the intercept (A) at period 36: A(I) A(36) (SMA(I)*2) = DMA(I) (173,161.33 * 2) - 159,125.69 187,136.97 3. Calculate the slope (B) at period 36: (SMA(I) - DMA(I))*2 B(I) = (173,161.33 - 159,125.69)*2 B(36) = 5 5,614.16 54 4. Generate the forecast for 12 periods ahead: FDMA A(36) + B(36) * 12 187,136.97 + 5,614.26 * 12 $254,508.09 Single Exponential Smoothing l. Initialize the model using the first Observation: SES(I) Y(1) 106,794 2. Generate subsequent forecasts using a: SES(I) a*(Y(I) - SES(I-1))+ SES(I-I) SES(2) .15 * (116,734 - 106,794) + 106,794 $108,285 Double Exponential Smoothing 1. Initialize the model using the first Observation: DES(I) Y(1) 106,794 2. Generate subsequent forecasts using a: DES(I) = ( a * SES(I)) + ((1 - a) * DES(I-1)) DES(36) (.15 * 168,949.54) + (.85 * 151,598.34) 154,201.02 55 3. Calculate the intercept at period 36: A(I) = (2 * SES(I)) = DES(I) A(36) (2 * 168,949.54) - 154,201.02 183,698.06 4. Calculate the slope at period 36: = (SES(I) - DES(I)) * a (l-oT) B(I) (168,949.54 - 154,202.02) * .15 B(36) = .85 2,602.68 5. Generate the forecast for 12 periods ahead: FDES A(I) + B(I) * X 183,698.06 + 2,602,68 * 12 $214,930.22 Triple Exponential Smoothing 1. Initialize the model using the first Observation: TES(1) Y(1) 106,794 2. Generate subsequent TES values using a: TES(I) (O * DES(I)) + ((1 - a) * TES(I-I)) TES(36) (.15 * 154,201.02) + (.85 * 141,424.62) 14,334.08 3. 4. 5. 6. 56 Calculate the intercept (A) at period 36: A(I) = (3 * SES(I)) - ( 3 * DES(I)) + TES(I-I) A(36) (3 * 168,949.54) - (3 * 154,201.02) + 141,424.62 185,670.18 Calculate the slope (B) at period 36: B(I) =( °' 2 * (1 - a * ((6 - 5 * a) * SES(I)) - )2) ((10 — 8 * O) * DES(I)) + ((4 - 3 * O) * TES (I)) B(36) .1 * (886,982.25 - 1,356,968.98 + 508,860.84) 3,887.70 Calculate the third polynomial coefficient at period 36: 2 C(1) = (1 f a ) * (353(1) - ( 2 * DES(I)) + TES(1)) C(36) .03 * (168,949.54 - 2 * 154,201.02 + 143,341.08) 116.66 Generate the forecast for 12 periods ahead: C 2 * X FTES(I) A(I) + B(I) * X + ( 2 ) FTES(36) 185,670.18 + (3,887.70 * 12) + .40 $232,322.98 57 Winters' Method In this example, the equations needed tO solve for each component of the Winters' equation are listed in Chapter III. The basic forecast for 12 periods ahead is: FFP(I) (A + B * X) * S FFP(36) (169,993.58 + 1,592.20 * 12) * 1.16 $219,355 Method Analysis The above methods Of time-series analysis produce unique forecasts for any given data set. A manager must choose the forecast generated by the procedure that handles the data set most efficiently. TO measure this "efficiency,” the "mean square error" (MSE) is computed for each method: 1 =___* MSE N 2E 2 (29) Where: N--is the number Of residuals. 2E2--is the sum Of squared residuals. The forecasting routine generating the smallest MSE is considered the "best" method for a particular data set. This measure Of accuracy lets management use several forecasting methods simultaneously and then decide which method provides the most accurate forecasts Of future activity. 58 The Program Written in Fortran IV, the program is listed in its entirety in the Appendix. The concept Of a multiple forecasting program is derived from two sources. Sullivan and Claycombe designed a system which fundamentally combined various forecasting methods into a single program.1 Montgomery and Johnson developed a routine to find the Optimum smoothing constants for use in Winters' Method Of exponential smoothing.2 Neither program contained extensive checks Of accuracy such as variance, standard deviation or number Of residuals exceeding two standard deviations. In addition, neither program included a comparative analysis based on each method's mean square error. Thus, this program is an extension Of and improvement on other programs commercially available. Control Cards and Data Deck Aside from the data set, several control cards must be input by the user. The control card and data deck set-up are listed in Table 6. Table 6. Control Cards and Data Deck Card Variable Name Format Description 1 N I3 Number Of data points. X, Y 12, F8.0 Period and corresponding data. NUM 13 Number Of data points used for moving averages. NUM must be an even multiple Of N. Table 6. (continued) 59 Card Variable Name Format Description ALPHA F5.3 Exponential smoothing constant. T 12 Number Of periods ahead that 6 NW, N1, KS, KN, LN, LT 7 (If KS = 0) WALPHA, WBETA, WGAMMA 7 (If KS =1) AL, AD, AU, BL, 30, BU, GL, GD, DU 8 (If KN = 0) 9 (If KN = 0) BO 10 (If KN = 0) 5(1) through (L + 5) 2I3, 211, 213 3F4.0 9F4.0 the forecasts will be made. These variables are all used in Winters' Method: NW--is the number Of data points and must equal N. N1--is the length Of the time series used in model calcu- lations. KS--is set at 0 if the smoothing constants are specified; or set at 1 if smoothing constant optimization is desired. KN--is set at 0 if initial values are specified; or set at 1 if the initial values are to be developed from the data. LW--is the length Of season. LT--is the forecast lead time. Specified smoothing constants. Lower limit, step size, and upper limit Of smoothing constants for the Optimization routine. The upper limit must be set one step size higher than the desired upper limit. Specified value Of permanent component. Specified value Of the trend component. Initial seasonal factors for each Of L periods. NOTE: Cards 8 through (L + 5) are needed only when KN = 0 (initial values specified) 60 Sample Run Using the data set listed in Table 5 and the control card specifications listed below in Table 7 (as formatted in Table 6), a sample computer run was made using the facilities Of the Michigan State University Computer Center. on pages 61-73. Table 7. The results (output) are included Control Card Specifications for the Sample Computer Run Card Variable User Specification Notes l N 2-37 X, Y 38 NUM 39 ALPHA 40 T 41 NW N1 KS KN LW LT 42 AL, AD, AU BL, BD, BU GL, GD, GU 036 (See data set listed 006 0.15 12 36 24 For 36 periods Of data. in Table 5) 6 months Of data used for averaging. Forecasts will be generated for the next 12 months. Length Of time series (36 periods). 24 months will be used in model calculations. Requesting Optimization of the smoothing constants. Initial values will be dev- eloped from the data. Length Of 1 season is 12 months. The lead time is set at 1 period. The lower limit for smoothing constant Optimization is set at 0.05 for each constant, the steps will increase at rate Of 0.05 and the upper limit will stop the Optimizing routine at 0.30. 61 ,. 'S .. SERI MULTIPLE FORECASTING OF A TIME tOOSIMPLC REGRESSIONOfi. ERROR ERROR-SO FORECAST 579980Q56965539535581635910601909036 248702599164189351531537303167807275 cocooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 90199955893531356972.0409388312550783 9590.2688401830043967860266983529R651 0015040235152306643058673389470Q1003 3461:..8502664“5153039305.“..03471871.409;, 0.47 722099138052070n_2699208356.nw.1733 98 21287517145801.7487325136360890.68 05b 3 .fiz9fiitfue7ingh..I976339fi1552 OKEDS 52 2 8306345451016 703135 94 053 2 1.2 5073 3 105873 2 213 1 1 2 00192336656633219001123366‘.“ ~33219°O 6““5“‘QSS~..55.:5‘55555554‘QRQ~000566 I......OOCOOOOOOOOOOOCOO0.00.0000... 77n¢r00806379r003906000-783926?0339888—3“ 0065257027669960741~30137D..8R..737(P181561 270. . 81y.354fl0013667§.efl.9321419359‘.9.92‘ - 75 Q 9108357877638 “0387821165. 0382 1 o “.1. Zflqccl . 1. . 322444-1- - . 1... «mo-D1. 3.099577665443321100o.n.8776654¢3321100 6bSSSSSSSSS—DSSSSSSSQQQOQQQQQQQOQQQQQ oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 1.51.61.615161615151516161.61.6161.31. 5161.6 025702570257025702570257025702570257 0.135.11112222103334499555....666677779898 7911.570.135.191357911.57913579135791357 fi31111122222333334QR4455550666557??? 1119.11.11.11111111111111111.1111¢A11111 000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000E000 oonocoo-00000000000009oooooooooooooo ‘0.016560841.7132287779556904283253571 9312AL821~7BJOL1513877610n.4F.50“O.fiL6.3851419 77109461671.1.1.96711.654877106317151.712 56639792195255697991.93167009282970740 0.1211111133590125.3.3487723056556509? 111.111.111.111 11111111111111111111211 16:50.56?89011920456789? 32305678901234.56 111.1.1111.11226‘?.222222333331 ..J 5127804.00 SUM OF ERRORS: .00 SUM OF FORECASTS 11208116385.86 AVERAGE Y SUM OF ERROR SOUARED= = 192439.00 18.50 A OF SIMPLE REGPESSION AVERAGE X: 2024.99 8 OF SIMPLE REGRESSION 109976.61 17487.07 STANDARD OEVIATION 365797677.01 NUMBER OF RESIDUALS EXCEEDING THO STANDARD DEVIATIONS VARIANCE 1 SIMPLE REGRCSSION FORECASTS FORECAST PERIOD 90. R 77 6554933 33331.33331.33 0000000000.. 1516151o31£.16 025702:..70.257 9.9990 0.1.. 011.11. 913580246502 788889999950 111111.1«11.12fis 780 . .....134:.L.Tr. 1.1.1.440 RQAARR 62 .00MCVIHG eVEPAGEScoc SI“PLE MOVING AVERAGE RESIDUAL RESIDUAL SO FORECAST ACTUAL PERIOD 11111041154034806996494399315069158 . - a c g . 0912.00.703‘63.69060012036127 00000000..00000000000000.0000. 95200350839369}. 9.396950215196206 083671256500950.400859082910418. 086—366046511955374793226495361 996772b607735501.39215593052992 820638408760628499058106020063 675698926296660553973642371368 840810376..E112371C797674733 25.3 .973BaPfiLsrt.Qh¢‘.27$.3801a2833 09‘. 529.7?— 352‘ 023282 1 3 36 1 1 1 1 2 11111107370707.3707377377377770077307 ......063656013601811316816165011356 .....OOOOOOOOO00.00.000.000... 772999575028925317056731180209 00752754 b9590850‘.5199954762882 963025391C166557 6127 6113723921 9.664592657635977695954195.“ 767 . . 212flcfl. 3212 311duafld. 1 1 Q2 .1I79$31071§:£JO71{X§J73t§193379i250011£r03 . c . . n . 06335301330919: 6935155135009 .053 0.000.000.0000oooooooooooooooo R7C411. ......U? 1.58743138950441102261 715495.084 5363?.345 513:5 1118: 6.. .6 680606488606098115323104459781 (585026212144206572065196CE973 111122222222234455665554455567 111111111111111111111111111111 DD0000030000000000000000000000000000 r.0000000000000.000.900000000000000.00.10 coo-0.000.000.0000.-000.00.000.00... QQ41656084167133.2287779.356909283283571 931228a3702313877 b1.-.0485049065851a19 77109461673310.6713654377146317183712 6561.97921952656975935316700923297740 0.12111111335801254354.677234565565098 111111111111 1111111111111111111211 12.545678901933056780.01234 567890.123956 1111 .1.J1s11.12222aAaco‘aczz‘.33333‘.. = 228320.00 OF RESIDUALS SUM 4199410.00 14616452799.06 FORECASTS SUM OF RESIDUAL SOUARED= OF SUM 21734.65 OF RESIDUALS EXCEEDING THO STANDARD DEVIATIONS= STANDARD 0EVIATION= FORECAST FOR ANY PERIOD AHEAD IS 472395047.55 VARIANCE= NUHPER 1 173161.33 63 DCUPLE MOVIES AVERAGE M(P) FORECAST RESIDUAL RESIDUAL-SO ACTUAL PERIOD IQ¢IT.IIYJIIIv.va579676310000u42752933r47‘fie . o n . c o u . - — . .34713:.6314Q62632637912357 OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO gecgeezdrdessn‘Qf“92315638“: nspUg4515011357Ac1682775782 803nm.3R.527238Q982Q6Q‘280~2 8‘5309OQOR62378105358‘72 807790628-98912999‘695090 3376137‘859SRC98737RQ6979 63CQ1597337129177‘513Q57 Tagalog-329.710.21.222 16316672 11 2917 6 £58 1210 85 11 1 22 1 1 11111111111133.362723831319599182“.76 - . o . . o o u . u . .27F93173$929Q37260802572 oooooooooooooooooooooooo 7.221.88Q2560‘3881‘18‘9‘52 ‘11‘86‘5269 0196931307899 ISB‘rtmb.‘8752.226152689192 23885c373Q-33108206117335 A3 . 3312 2 .552 1.113 42. . c . . . 1117.7.111111133148387270.310.8219286636 . . . . . - . . . . . .2790.68263078Q37739197.22 coco-cocoooooooooooooooo 89..3992.39Q3282031333013 54939 01728796236130.453627 2437931662R137353Q553515 99512765496559?612879Rr45 23222122956878.65544.34678 11111111111.1111111111111 IIIYAIIIIIIIOAV81‘9~1272°’82‘2866839999 . c c - a u a . - - o6121960350,676A¢7‘°.7809.03636 ......................... Solarl‘uCJ‘lt.31.!‘835‘886‘77315 ‘3‘043 USO—Dncgfioqlvl b109flu~90¢866n¢ E£~29.1o‘59.556211737170.5311 8C113332‘71754593577531.1259 126‘3‘22222233"555555‘.555‘. 1111111111111111111111111 nZUDnXUCnKEJOnZUOnXUOnIUOnXUDfiXUOnXQOOZEUOnXEUO n52U0nX20052U0rzzbOnBEUODBKUCDEXEUOnKECOnfiEUO o0.0000000000000000‘OOOOOOI....000... 44Q16553841713228777955b904283283571 9312292370.23138776100485049065951419 77199A61673319671365A877146317183712 6653979219525569799383167009289.8774”. n.1211111133580125635487723A5655655G 8 1;141¢q.1¢1.....1.1¢1¢1; 1;1¢1;1¢1‘1;1;1;141¢1;1‘1.1;1A1‘1;1¢1;q;nch14 19.1.4567895 1951u“56789n Eln‘SR—uu6789fl-.123~56 1c .1111.1111229.2n¢n¢flt6 .fisz-J‘vasizxvis 74060.33 OF RESIDUALS SUM = 3592869o67 16853618988010 SUM OF FORECASTS SUM OF RESIDUAL SQUARED VARIANCE 28119.03 STANDARD DEVIATION 79C£79955o17 0 NUMBER OF RESIDUALS EICEEDING THO STANDARD DEVIATIONS DOUBLE MOVING AVERAGE FORECASTS FORECAST PERIODS AHEAD 39.Q9=.15273R.4 247925702570 000000.00... 159389.515939. 123558912356 BROEZBRITBQZD 28.95062735‘ 9900122334Q5 11222222222? 1.21.Q.:.L7 9 011,12 1Q.94 64 fi**EXPONENTIAL SHOOTHING*‘* SHOOTHINB SINGLE EXPONENTIAL FORECAST RESIDUAL RESIDUAL-SO E ACTUAL PERIOD 11002:.85850297259§.529533‘137515.16311 . . 0970389268.9926469665611931551180327 .0OOOOOIOOOOOOOOOOOOOO0.0.0.0000... 01.089901‘5215‘2431536352817293309783 CROITO’293227997C92520363R93£R725273 69.465531.43{.9n.331576.5599292323699128 33.0». “675.2r417‘54314cug75909486nu27376292 «51553539254675036299613274231.951253 8829195061682238‘549696989909‘62960 8744‘9R§.1~l325 068831305R813§1a¢cOO61e 91 79.3 8131.7 65.325213360021259 21727 3 63051 IRS-55238863 22 3 801 11. 1. 2 21 1100509259011067898035230139210473519 . .0°69710597R62320815565729601Q12§9Q8 ooo.coco-coco.ooooooooooooooooooaoo 0917-7136783ng1817690525‘Q6989P0632 42651225005930663329027978298717364 98059312181q2K~61635818O5566n¢8v¢907€93 9728.52267293 . 28313‘R8947QQ59183313 . .2133“. 132.121.4222”.- 11 1 531. u . 7.10050 1859099967 212075810139890637591 . . UG:5280512.§5237919QO3‘329598687‘051 coo...coco-00.000000000000000.no... Q599 703R6236260959C9QQ3RR8590292838 9P:.660539180781037EDQSEOITTEEG3Q054 72925329551011107059KST927C3£8162¥3119 680123Q33705977999.93527185469003426 n.01111111122111122233RQ5QR444555566 1111111111111111111111111111111111... 0005018590990672120758701398906375914 3D935390.512:7......37919993.32969968749515 ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 445987Q346236260959D9Q93R485942928389 99856:.05391507810378C45801776633AC5§4 7729253295KS110111072957927036816851199 65991239337C5977948935271859 69 90.342325 D09111111112211.1122233A9544Q4Q5555666 111111111111.1111111111.111111111111111 00000000000000COOCCDODOCDOCDOOCCUODOD 00080090000000CDOCDOOODDCOCODDOODDDOU coo...goo-000.09.000.00.oooooooono... 0904165608A17132287779556934293283571. 93122923702313?7761004850A9065851419 77109ASIA-7331967136548771A6317183712 5563979219526569789383167009282877Q0 01211111133580125A35487721.9565565098 111111111111. 11111111111111111111211 ‘33:,15456799 011053 ‘5 5789C1.23Q56189n.9 oars-3‘56 111111.1111222204222223333333 A1Q370026 RESIDUALS= SUM OF 460663907Q SUM OF FORECASTS: 17277075784o62 SUM OF RESIDUAL SOUARED 19429.50 STANDARD DEVIATION= 211311349.25 or RESIDUALS cxcscoruc THO STANDARD ozvxatxows FORECAST FOR ANY PERIOD VARIANCE: NUHPER 3 1689A905Q AHEAD IS DOUBLE EXPONENTIAL SHOOTHING RESIDUAL'SO RESIDUAL FORECAST ‘ U ACTUAL DES PLPIOD 65 HHOO OC‘NHHONOONNNOOOQFHOCNQnU‘QOOFFNU‘F I A coOutta!-ChlthflC-mfinfina‘c‘OflOO‘FNONCJOEQO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO0.000.000.0000. acmmcmcuocomnawcmnwhcmmeAQNFknhcwt tarmac-omho-«uoc0mmmn~a.~mnonor~ma.nonm\nh~osnw ~0rana¢1cwucmo¢~mncunm oceaamm~~v~ct~ucv~~0h¢¢ nochccrma‘mooflnmoasa‘cnhmmnmocncnnconnh ummm-osnncownnomwnwnmo DCOQO‘FA ~‘DONC9OH .na‘mwnnnmwmuwo‘hnnomcmofiumnoo ”HIHOON duo"). nhtnc-o—OHMJO‘FINV‘IQ. omhnnaonnm Mn JNNN 0MB N Cn¢n¢:fl@ men ‘0 WHO‘ONOIOC ODnOON N urn-ammo: "000‘ H NF! “ON N v-a d No. N an:rmacawncunnwmmonohathOcomN@omwwna IIuorhcmommmmoncahmchwmoumnmhcunmwhoo OOOOOOOOOIOOOOOOOOOO0.......0000... oachmmnchomfikctnhhmunonhdo¢nouuonan cnmmomma smock-ampmnmmnmmoncnommohwcnn wnummomomcannmcmoxennwomomnh ¢mohnh anon: noumnncohnunm Nounoaunwocho FGHDOOC «I llN-«lenlunn a nu. Thu-c I Ito-cl I II HHOOU‘U‘00‘Dnamhdflsflflchv”NCQNOCOu-Oflh-CDKMDOWO I luuomncmo‘hthawnnunmm cmwnawmaur «~0an oooooooooooooooo00000000000000.0000 toammonmocmmooncomcI-ncNeo-onmc'mnoona‘n whowr-mnawnmwnwo—cmmnfisoar-camnmmcmnona FF ooops»;cmmwwwumohoconownc‘nnwuunor-o \DU‘QOQFWFOIOC0n®GHNmO~JQHFNNONfl€DOOthfl wouunua—oumwnwdumnntCcouhoflmflmmmoohw mnudnnuuundddnn«dud—HaunuudnunHM—Q uommeocmmnmnmcowomonncnommnonoocanon IOwwmcSnumnhmwonwocunomcnmucwmfimnmfihc 000000.00....OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOQOOOO. rumuwcoommwuwhmoommhommcmmhmnmomoww NocmhdmNOGC“thwhmwnmmxmnthnmmnCHO (“munghufithdh-JCJHONU‘U a,7~!~m~~c—ow:c~cnnr~m an nronuHNNnCJHHuHHo-a—OHNNN Hanocnmmmdwmucoamnncnuwhwuomocunammowmochuo Icnnmnuocwuuomcooomunmmnnmnohnmcuomooo coo-0.000000000000000...too.00.00000 0N0 aw home-«memnwnmncmcmmhmbomcov~t~ha annoy-uncroommnntnr-mummmwommumoonnb‘nnmm hmnmnumuomoowcuomucuscuhmma‘utm—mmocwo mmOtun-Nbowhcflmmn—oha-¢0m000r)oc'~mr~~ummn uonunnnanmwnwnawnnnccmwowmmmmw mocha": MfiHflHHHv-io-oflMHHfiflddfidHNflflHHde-‘dflfifldfl onan-«awocomwmcmnwhhnonmm—our-wmmnmmoonow on 00' nN—ommocu-oto«mucuhhmmr-Nachdnnnmmcnno 00.000.00.00oooooooooooOooooooooooooo CCFQFU‘NwUIOmvltw‘DfiHOOO-‘flCOONCDIOOI'INNFMHCGO‘EH 00~Om~¢oowmcGomochccmutmcfinwnomcficmmo FFUL-‘fitNP—dnn or-m—ouwhnomthumnn ..IOCNNIDQU‘IN \D\DFP'QJLUACJOVAKJPHDIDIDWVDFD‘C «ct-unmhnomnwnmomac unoc-ouoanddn«unnundwmwwnnnnnnt0?!ttnn HHNflfiMHocfldHHfiWHHNHNHnO-fiNHNHHv-QHHHHHH'Ofl ")uc ”)rumn floor; nonoooovzao "OLnoOOO-Jca-‘Jogoooo O963000000C‘OOOOC‘OOC’DOOOOOODDOOOOOOOOOO O0.000000000000000...0.00.00.00.00... ccctnwnwowtflh—o'flfiflwhhbU‘anO‘ocNmnwmnnho-o a-ndrgr.‘ [H “GP-l . ‘Jnfin¢.7~h \DF‘QCJ 31-2170 C‘.’~3VDU"LWHCNO‘ hh—onmcm—nwh dm-«mms—cnu‘nfloarhhdconn‘s—omnh—ON QO'OMO-hmmdwDOJQWOU‘FFSO‘WGJIOHQFOCO‘NWNQOF-FCU oraanHdn—nvcnnnmov-cwncnnncor-h(ancmomnomamw duo-odowrcnvnu-u-cfi HHuHrcnnrnHHnHHMo-oudnnfiNHv-O ;‘ '0! .V'CWOFI‘U‘C‘ nmncmwhmmc fiNDCWQFflJO‘L‘rfl‘JnCIOO HHH‘4rOr-0HHHHNC‘JOH'IN(¢t.\uCuanP)nF)F3nn : 115679-69 SUI OF RESIDUALS = Q935335o31 13133939022093 SUM OF FORECASTS SUM OF RESIDUAL SOUARED= VARIANCE: 20908.69 STANDARD DEVIATION A165145Q0002 3 NUMBER OF RESIDUALS EXCEEDING THO STANDARD DEVIATIONS= DOUBLE EXPONENTTAL SHOOTHING FORECASTS FORECAST PERIODS AHEAD cmnmmrnuot-mn hcuhonmmdumw 00.0.0000... nnmm—ocmmwtho OOOOfidv-OHNCJCJIO no .n—osntmnnr-nth dHflHv-‘HNNNCJNN «Nl'ydmwh-ma-l o-ON H'AH TRIPLE EXPONENTIAL SHODTHING FORECAST RESIDUAL RESIDUAL-SO TC TES TA ACTUAL PERIOD 66 HnouhflonfimemQU‘kWNv-dmthfimflFCNU‘CGMU‘NQO I I owonhnm cmxmnmunamwm«fiddmnwonmhumcwo .0..0O0.0.0.0.........COOOOOOOOOOOO onmenmntdomdnomumtccmwummnmwnmndon OO‘NFQFHJ‘K‘awOnNo-IFEFCIDTIHOU‘O‘ non-«ahwmnwc 00010-00 .memmmnmwmnmnhmhcnmmrrcummmwnom ncomnomhmcmmwunconmcmmhuhmmnhmohoto anomwnmtmhwhmHOchupducamoomawotmno acommtmmnmmmmhdmnnoomcdmhnc~onmcnoo anumn novmonOcmuhmnmmnuoonwnHtonmnu mun acmomoo nonuh n nncmnumonono N In I'III'MV Nnfl 0" 0° v-IH o-I (VI-Id n .4 NH N Ho—nmfi 0N co mwmmhummmhmmnmomnnnomnhnooom IIummnmaom090ho¢o«¢«mononaowmwhownhnn no...oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Duo «an oponmnwnmncw‘h«nonunhmnhwnoa~m comnncnocgdhwhnwnacnmmbnmwn3H6mnmmm mmcntenannwcn—nmhcmonm0ahuwmnonwmca manNImoncmfinummncanOAncHonnncnnhNo HI I IIN find find. In ant—a Inleud II II I HwfinOONCOCOthunmmnOflnflOOnndNnOFFOOOO I I OCOHDU‘ monnmmhonmmouncooowawnhwmnan-n cococoon...00.00000000000000000000 cnucoohmmmnhonmmwowuncconununownnnn $n¢wn00FmwwmmunmmnmwommcnwconOhCuop FNUMDO" MUCHU‘CmOfltIVwOU‘ONU‘VDNNWCQOHNNF‘OIO \o-«nP-tr OdwcmNH-ncc owocuno-mnma‘momhunono oduuawuudmncflunwnctnnormo¢cnmnnm00¢ Hudnuudnunufl«Hauuduuunnnunuununnnnu homoewcdtmdamcmNmOFOFOhouoononmNuhmma IcmohmcocuNmmmcommanDmdnohcmmodnmwud 000.00.000.00.0.00000000000000000000 nncdwmhnuhwnonnwoccooumonomoanNOOAH murmur 0mm COF‘NhF-(‘JU‘IOHQ nwnuchnonnnnnwow HHIOII HannNNN I?IIIIIIHuu wonmdaomwchdwowficwocnnfionmowummOchNF Inaancmmmmn¢no~n¢o>~n¢mccocom~o¢nou~o O...OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO00.0.0.0. fi-«nmwa‘rm-d? “”101-0an FfiNd‘Onha I'M: O‘NU‘no-obmou‘. madaunooammnoomomwmoccmwomcoowwodnn omnmct‘nca-chnhgunnmntthwemucc‘conwmoc Hudnn awn II «nwnnnmnw n a not Homohomncccnoonncnuccncnon¢oosn¢mcNhO Ioomwwwhmcmooanoonm«mammwwwnnwhnowwnn 0000000000000000000.0000000000000000 comwomhommhcmhmc‘ko (MONOCCC ¢Om¢nFnFOO O0FFfinnmwoaflnm0¢oaomnfiaNfl¢0mmfiFNOQPF mewnmwroowhnnnnmhmhhnmNnNOHouomuhow ~901Mb mmmhuw mc‘unwocoud-mcmmwc macocomh run ounuduuunuunwnnwnc«cooohmccnnnnnnkou HdfldwddddfifldflfiddnfidHHHHHflHHdNHfiflHHfiH oomnwowcccnohmwnacmwchonnmhmcoonuo0N0 OOmhhonetncnnmcmmwctaumxcmdonmnuoomoo coco00000000000000.0000...00000000000 CChCQOFnththONNdQ¢FONMmFNmOQNDnnOOd mmmcuamhhahmmw¢cdmmohhowohnhcmmcmmwwv hpmm«moocmnmhcnhnmhhhmtommhcuhnmcmoon monophhmmoomauwwnncnONonNcoOGuntohOwn ooooooOOOOCIqufidH-nndH—IHHNNNwnnnnnnct HHddfiHdqudrfi-«fifino—Iddfifidnum“dandy-Inna" nonnnomononoaonooonooanoacnooooonoooo coo cancoupoooc‘ooooocnooaoo t -ooocoooooo coocoo000.00.000.00...00000000000000. 00¢ CH1) {IwOmOv-Oh unwwmmhm IDIDOU‘OONGI'INQ "Who-I a-n HC‘INtNFIF uNanWFF ‘ouootmmocmoomamncnc‘ FFdamCOdwhnnflmmhunwmcwhhuconnhnmnhum «no QM'J‘FmNI-Ia‘nnm omomh 110‘ naruaflhoomuamnhhcc nnmnuddudnnnwcnwmcnmtmkhmnomwnnwnoom HHfiM¢ovI¢Ir~H MFA HHHH—IHn-«Hudd—cudchndHNu—I -..-u antln mkmm u-«Nncnmhmmu-cmnc mahwmowwmcno v-I—r-IHCIIH'I v-IHv-INNNNNCUNNOJC‘HODI'IWIODFJ 70511098 OF RESIDUALS= SUH A950Q98.52 SUM OF FORECASTS: 1A991839352000 SUM OF RESIDUAL SOUARED= VARIANCE: 21503.76 STANDARD DEVIATION: NUMBER OF RESIDUALS EXCEEDING THO STANDARD OEVIATIONS= A62A1161Ao91 3 TRIPLE EXPONENTIAL SHOOTHING FORECASTS FORECAST PERIODS AHEAD flnm05$mooauo chuONOhhhcon 000000000000 OMNI-INnmCId‘v-Ia‘h wmwwawmna tum” hwnhnommmonm mnemhmodmmhw QC‘G‘OOHHNNIOP‘I C HuuNNNNNNNNN "mmcmu‘ hwchHN way-ova 67 mama.» n Na cenmua mom copu~z~ ooohhwwuu uhzuzoazou hzu24zmua Acupuzn cum: um 44a) mzowqmm u o» ozouwummou tour: (pdo no woommma tn hmmmu Hi» «#40 urh team oup Athnzm ..coorpu: mxupznzcca 68 SMOOTHING CONSTANT OPTIMIZATION ROUTINE RESIDUAL SUM OF SQUARES PETA GAMMA ALPHA a.CDDOD0000DOODDOODDODOCOODOODDDDDD00000000000000.00000000COCOCDCODDDDCDCCCCn: _ 11.1111.11.11.11111111111111111.111.11.111.111.11111111111111111111111111111111111111...I Q¢¢++QOOQQOQ+++OOOOOQOOO09Q‘OQOOOOOOQQOOOO99¢¢§O¢§¢9+OOOQ++Q+OOQQO9994000999 ErLEEEE.LEEEr:LF.EEEEEEEEF.P.EEEEEEEEEEEE[EEC—....EEEEF.EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEC.EEEEFCF35.72.... 6891.359023570246993579IDS-(91‘6802Q79780135023568357802780245513579 2468026110.... 22233321.333333333Q33334Q333AQRDRQR442233333333333333QRDDQRRRQQRARRRRRQE52221, oooooooooo0000000000000000000000000...coo.oooooooooooooooooooo...-o...oooooo 59595050505050505058535050505050505050505050.30505050950505059.395050509505953:.q 0.19.6521.C11a¢fl::01«12nc3nu116zéi.0116ufic1u011.221.O1.lfic6‘1u011223c112«(Rucllfisné‘vflallnunéssCllnsfigtt .112 . coo-0.000000000000000000.0000.cocooooooooooooooooooooooooocoo...ooooooooooo. r. 55.55.:ODDIOUOSSSSRJDODDEC00.R4555:.Sgoocccfi_5555.500900055.:5‘35009ODIOK.SSC..5500.n.Cn.PEEZHF ODDDCC1.11111111111222229.?2222233333300000511.11111111111122222222222231.331.1:UP. n. .- o.oooocoo.coo.00.00000oooocoo.000.00.00.00cocoooooaooooooooooooooo000.0...o. c..=¢::.5fi.r£ 55555555555... 5555:-.55555555555 DCDDDODDDUDDDDUODUDDCDDODDODCDCCDninn... 3...: .. GOODnan-.90:.03009900000CDGOODOUODDDDD9011111111111111111111111111111111.1111s.11.. 00....0.00..........OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO0.00.0000...O. 69 00053DOCDOODOCOUDDO000000008DDCOCDDODOOCODOO000000ODDODODDCOUCUDCDCCCDOG.UDCDCCCC 111.1111.1.111111.1111.111111111111111.11111111111111.111111.11111111111111111111111111111 ooooo00oISOQO¢¢6¢¢§o¢9,900.¢§¢§OQOOO§++¢¢6¢¢¢OOOQQ¢++§¢¢++¢¢¢4+o¢+§+¢Soooooooooooo Er.r.r.rEFri....EF.EF:LEE915—5..EEEEEEEEEF.P.EEEF.EFLEEEEF=LCCEEEEEF.E€.EEEEEEF.EF.r.EEEE—LCCF.EEE.Lf.r.r.....r.t.r.rFLE 139123562356895680.12783135902Q5756789078012301235623‘67935639157902434567955730.1.7 332333333333333333R433A, QR QDRQRRQ2222232233333333333193333133333.3313A.RR2222222222232 oooooo.ono...coo-cocooooooooooooococo-00.00.000.-coco-0.000.000.0000...cococoa... 505.0505059505053505050505059505050505050505050.30505050505050950505050505C59:.0....95CS 7.1.0311. a: garu11fi¢n¢3011n£9~36.11:59.301.153.305»110521.0L11nénc30ulink/.30»1.19.9530112n5301126s1~nu112n.11Lllfisnsian.. ooooo00000000000000.0000.0.000000000000000...coco00000000000000.0000...o.oooooooo 55...n5..DOC5555....5000.00955555SOCCCOCSS:.555000CCOS555550CDCOUSS-355500900955:“SSRhVODCCCS 9911.1. 11.111111122222222???233333.13.»COCOC11111111111122222222222233331....DD CDCnhh.111111I coo-opoo-0.000000000000000...coo.oooooooooooocoo.oouooooooooooodooooooooooooooooo SSSErSREEJRR 55....5555555:.555555555553903C39DC0390300n.30390000309D0099309555: ,c-.r~;.:5r..5c.c .5 11.11111.111111111111111111111111112222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222 ooooocoo.oooooooooooooooooooooooocoo-00.00.00.000oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 70 Ca.0009000000000000900DD00COOOOODDDDDUDDDDCOOOODDO0000000000 1.111.1.1.1.11.11111111111111111111111.111111111111111111111111111. 0o0+6.9906.009¢94¢¢o+¢¢¢+¢¢+6§++¢¢¢o¢¢9¢¢ooo¢¢¢¢§¢++¢¢O¢¢¢§o Eff???.EFFEEEF.EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEF.EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE 0.6.1.239013.51653568245790233‘56R55678567990789013831234012356 2233323333333331.3333339222222222222222223222333233333333333 0.0.0.0....0.00.00.00.00......OOOOIOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO0.00.... 053505050505359505950505053505050505050505050.3350:.050505050 11221.6.1.1223C11223C11223011n.23311223C111223911223011223C11223 ...coo-o...coo-o.coon.ooooooooooooooooooooo00.000.000.00... 5555:.3900.CCSSSESSDDODCD555555000090555555000090555555000090 111.119.229.2222n¢2221.3‘.3330cacn.01111111111112222222222223333.33 00.00.0000.00.00.000.000.oooooooooooooooooococo-000000.000. ... .55...5c.....555555:..:9.55555555305.9903330C03030003h.00.909090003100003 22222222222222222222222333333333333.333333333333333333333333 cocoon-.00.0000000000000000000000000000000000000.0000000000 THE OPTIMUM SMOOTHING CDNSTANTS ARE: .05 GAMMA .05 .30 BETA: ALPHA INITIALIZATION PHASE OUTPUT OF THE RESIDUAL L In TREND SEASONAL FACTOR FITTED MOD psnnnuznt COMPONENT OBSERVATION PERIOD 71 omcmmmnanmhumchwnmmnmhtw o«ca-Chocmoooor~o~onma~mmmmcm 00.000.00.00000000000000 CM€mQ¢aHCHF~ONDHFODO~NNFDn~DCh «marsh-mommcmmmcwmwnnbcwm ommflouxnmmndhcwhcwcma‘m I C unmomuann humwnnummoc O ITII—III ?II—¢~—4 H I I ocommmnonmnmmch—cmmwh—onco amatehucmomnmhommnonccncm 000.00.00.00000000000000 Chic ooahcmnnomomamcmoannm «dcmmr-hwhnmonwmmchwnodd «mmmnmwowumcwoomamcmww owwowawhnmmwucom~m~mumum «Nantunudcnccauuumnnnchhm HHHHHHHF‘HHHNF‘HF‘H Hv-Iv-Iv-Oo-‘HH hmmahhmm mmoosmuouhmmmmm mmoomwmnoncc monommm—tan cocooooooooooooooooooo NH HOMO-I "H "F." 00 mo 0 o nfl‘oomwor-mnnmcm—owmmOOva-tw I."CLOT‘QF'OFOH‘DF'IFADOCU‘IDOJCNU‘F ooooooooooooooooooooo.oo \DU'NInhuno-«r.mmhmmcdmmmhmmown «mmmmu-mohmmdoammOh-«Nnomm «...—a. hgmcr:nn¢ra¢.o\fimmv~munr ax NNNUH—ouvaHHHHM-n Mono-«HHNNNH hmmmmoonsoumhnomwommhbmoco «Hutmcwmncmmnmnnhmwnwwoho 0.000.000.00000000000000 (FF wcwuc-Qummcwmfim(.wnchmmw. amoHchauumr-‘O‘NOIDmmmmnhmhm ONcmmwdcdcmmnc'honomhwumn °¢P~u1nCJCOJNCanN~HF~ tmdhnmhh NNNI‘JNNCJNNNNNNNNNHF)?‘IDU‘HDID H. I .4. IH. IvI'IHHfifi'IcIrIflrIquvIHflv-I'I oooooo cocoooonooooocoooo GOODODGUOCoQOCI00000000000 ......OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO C? 3.444;) ODI‘DO—dfi HnNOH-Dh-BFO‘IDIDO ONO—INNQ NmFONnHMBFm—domwm hhnomc wdohnnnc‘whmmm'afih mo~0anmNHmmemwmhaa‘nmm—om 0..ruuo-tuv-«Hnnnmmcwoouncnmtwhh fi'IHHHfier-Io-Io-Ov-IH HHo-Iflflu-AHFOHHH «arm n wr‘u‘o-c ammo wwhmwvv‘Nn‘I HflHfi—IHHHHPInfllIvhHu 79.58 AVERAGE RESIDUAL= STANDARD DEVIATION 1909.82 OF RESIDUALS= SUM 9718.70 90453063.9O MEAN ABSOLUTE DEVIATION VARIANCE 7620.78 1 NUMBER OF RESIDUALS EXCEEDING THO STANDARD DEVIATIONS OUTPUT OF FORECASTING PHASE FORECAST LEAD TIME IS I PERIODS = 12 PERIODS SEASON IS LENGTH OF TH SEASONAL FACTOR TRE pERMANENT COMPONENT DHSERVATION PERIOD 90~nwuhomhom lwwwonmeHnu 0..00...00.0 H01 "000-. wmnhnmmwmdwo momnmcwoonow 000000000000 ocowcomnmnmm ocmnreowsnno Ohmhomcaommm "doIv-Ors—Io00-0H0-Ar0—I 0 COFOrIan-«Dw In WOOD—oonh‘DU) 00000000000. ”NF-OJINNWNO-Iznrn DmdMJNflNO‘FQO‘ nmuncnmnuor‘m O-OOO mochcouom nmmmnmmwohhw Hfifimcd.1NH04HH 000000000000 ooooooaaonao 00000..000.0 00¢ Na!" “Omar—c ocmOmmmmnc-«h «comhumnhdu saoomzrvapco Nrocmw-nnmne‘c a. Huuunnunamuu IDVDFCLO‘UMCJI'OCIOAD (‘JNNNN'OIOI'N' Inf". TRACKING SIGNALS ERROR ERROR FORECAST PERIOD OTHED ERROR SMD CUM. 72 chownnpoowwo oun«~w~~«onn ..0...0000.0 IIIIIIII I 04) cunnmmc 0‘ on Owwwwnanwmnc 0.0.0.000... «wnwnnNnIIN IIIIIIII I thmwmhwmmnh OHOOF NutU‘nOIDm 0000000000.0 0-«1 mmunwmruoaa nnhwwmnwmnco nnumcwnn I OOH-A nunmwcn "fit 7"". I Io-I 0n (:1 I «umnnohtmwmh Unowhmnonmnn 0000.....0oo haomeOOQmoo OOFFNHHMONQ hnwhunnmnnmc omnhunOthmc NCDCBJDmnmnc fiddflHHHfi—H—IN WOFwO\C-HCMCIDJI NNIVNCOF’N’IFN'IF. nn -2256.70 AVERAGE FORECAST ERROR '27?PU.AI SUM OF FORECAST ERRORS VARIANCE: 1153A.AR STANDARD DEVIATION: I33OAAZ9P.81 HINTERS METHOD FORECASTS USING FORECAST PERIODS AHEAD NCNmnn0h¢wm¢ NFOJMDIDQO0HFOI- 00..000.0000 onumcnwnunmm whnoflcthmwuo @homwmouthoc wanQOQOCOWQ nmwwflmphhnOn nunununuwwwm HNmtmwbuaUHN an" 73 METHOD ANALYSIS METHOD MEAN SQUARE ERROR SIMPLE REGRESSION 335797677.41 SIMPLE MOVING AVERAGE 087215093.27 DOUBLE MOVING AVERAGE 702234124.SC SINGLE EXPCNENTIAL SMOOTHING 493630736.70 DOUBLE EXPONENTIAL SMOOTHING 392398257.83 TRIPLE EXPONENTIAL SMOOTHING ' 427980981.49- HINTERS METHOD 127049974.27 USING GIVEN PARAMETERS. THE BEST FORECASTING METHOD IS: ** HINTERS METHOD ** 74 CHAPTER IV--NOTES 1William G. Sullivan and w. Wayne Calycombe, Fundamentals of Forecasting (Reston, VA: Reston Publishing Company, Inc., 1977), pp. 113-120. 2Douglas Montgomery and Lynwood Johnson, Forecasting and Time Series Analysis (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1973), pp. 278-282. CHAPTER V SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Introduction This paper attempted to create a multiple forecasting tool that has the ability to handle various data sets associated with telecommunication properties. The multiple forecasting system is intended for use by both professionals and students, especially those interested in acquisition finance. The forecasts generated might be used as part of the financial analysis required by both investors and lenders in their determination of property's potential. The forecasts can also be used as part of managements ongoing financial analysis for an established property. The chapter begins with a summary of results and a discussion of the model's limitations followed by conclusions and recommendations for further study. Summary of Results The data set used in this study consisted of monthly radio station revenues over a three-year period. The radio station, located in the Midwest, is in the top 100 markets and has more than five other 75 76 stations competing for advertising revenues in the market. Using established forecasting theories, discussed in Chapter III, projections of future revenues were generated. Initial calculations were validated manually. Then, using a computerized multiple forecasting routine, developed in Chapter IV, monthly revenue forecasts were generated for the next year. Seven common methods of time-series analysis were used to generate multiple forecasts. These methods were used because each has strengths and weaknesses in handling various data sets common to broadcasting. In addition, the mean square error for each method was calculated as part of the "Method Analysis." This method analysis, on page 73, shows Winters' Method as having the lowest mean square error and therefore providing the best forecasts for the given data set. This is evident earlier in the results which showed an average forecast error for Winters' Method of only -2,256.40. Compared to the average observation of 142,439.00, the average fore- cast error is fairly insignificant. Other checks of forecast accuracy included a standard deviation of 9,7l8.7, a variance of 94,453,063 and calculation showing that there was only one residual which exceeded two standard deviations. The variance measure provides the operator with a mathematical index of the degree to which the individual observations (revenues) deviate from the mean. The standard deviation represents the given distance of the observations from the mean, and is useful in the examination of residuals. The fact that only one residual exceeds two standard deviations in the Winters' example indicates this particular method 77 does a reasonable job in tracking the observations. Since Winters' Method appears to be the best time-series analysis for this particular data set, one would conclude that the monthly revenue observations follow a seasonal trend. The strength of Winters' Method lies in its ability to track seasonal variations and formulate projections which also follow similar seasonal trends. Like other exponential smoothing methods, Winters' Method averages historical observations in a decreasing (exponential) manner. However, Winters' Method adds a third smoothing constant to the forecasting equation to account for seasonality. A second look at the method analysis shows simple regression with the next lowest mean square error. While the data set follows seasonal fluctuations, as indicated by Winters' Method, these changes do not appear extreme and the data seems to be increasing in somewhat of a linear manner. Linear data is best handled by regression methods of forecasting. Limitations Results indicated that, for this particular data set and using given parameters, Winters' Method provided the best forecasts. This is important, not because of the particular forecasts generated, but because it demonstrates the progranfs ability to project data using various forecasting methods. There are, however, several limitations to the program which need to be discussed. First, the user must supply several parameters such as the number of periods used in moving averages or the exponential smoothing 78 constants. Changes in these parameters will effect forecast accuracy. Likewise, the user supplied boundries for Winters' optimizing routine can be changed so the resulting smoothing constants alter the fore- casts. Therefore, some level of expertise is required to operate the program. The second major limitation involves the data set used in this paper. This data consisted of monthly revenue figures from a single Midwest radio station. Not all data sets have monthly observations, some consist of quarterly or yearly observations which would change the results. Monthly data tend to exhibit a seasonal pattern and yearly data will most likely be linear. Similarly, only one station in one market was tested. Different market sizes, conditions, and character- istics might also alter the results. Since time-series analysis is based on the continuation of previous market and station patterns, changes in program strategy, not an underlying trend, could cause severe fluctuations in this historical pattern. Likewise, changes in the market, such as new competition being introduced or stations going off- the-air, will affect the outcome. Finally, only "revenues" from a radio station were used to test the program. Other financial variables such as cash flow and expenses may have their own unique forecasting needs and limitations. Likewise, forecasts of non-financial Variables such as ratings and shares, should be tested to see if the program can accommodate these data over time. Other media also need to be tested in the model. Observations from television or cable properties may contain characteristics not explored in this paper. 79 Conclusions Despite its limitations, the program developed in this paper is a powerful and unique forecasting tool. Unlike standard fore- casting routines, this program combines several methods of time-series analysis in order to handle various types of data sets without having the operator develop a forecasting system for each type of data that needs to be analyzed. This multiple forecasting system also provides the operator with various methods for analyzing each individual routine. In addition to the mean square error calculations used to identify the best routine, each method is evaluated using measures of variance, standard error and the number of residuals exceeding two standard deviations. A key advantage of this forecasting program is the ability to analyze the accuracy of each routine. This self-analysis adds strength to the multiple forecasting program, and increases the comprehensiveness of the program without sacrificing the ease of operation which is another of its strengths. The computerized multiple forecasting routine developed in this paper, serves as an adequate base upon which management can develop a budget which accommodates previous performance and future expectations. Recommendations The limitations discussed in previous sections highlight the need for further testing of the model. Likewise, the limitations might be reduced as the model is expanded and refined. 80 First, the model needs testing using numerous data sets from a wide range of media, markets, and properties. This must be done to insure the model's comprehensiveness and utility. As unique data sets are introduced, the model should react accordingly and generate unique forecasts which must also be as accurate as possible. This accuracy can be further enhanced by proper selection of model parameters. Iterations using various smoothing constants and moving average numbers need to be done in an attempt to find the optimum parameters. However, this process could be tedious and diminish the usefulness of the model. To alleviate this problem, it might be possible to expand the model to include optimizing routines to generate smoothing constants in a similar way the Winters' optimizing routine provides the Alpha, Beta and Gamma. Further optimizing routines would help the model react to many different data sets. They would also strengthen the individual forecasting methods contained in the model. Currently, the optimizing procedure in Winters' Method gives this forecasting routine an advantage over the other methods in the system which suffer without the optimizing. The time-series techniques used in this program are essentially "short term" in nature. They provide optimum forecasts for periods of one year or less. Therefore, they should be updated on a monthly or quarterly basis. This ongoing process should be part of a station's budgeting procedure. The information provided will let management examine previous performance, continually update the forecasts and modify them in light of new information. 81 To further enhance the program's usefulness, the language needs to be converted from Fortran IV to Basic so it is compatible with smaller computer systems. This would make the program more attractive to owners of smaller broadcast stations. There are other options that may be included in the program to make it more appealing to these smaller station owners. One addition would be a scattergram option. The data in question would be plotted so managers can graphically see existing trends. This visual plot of data over time may be helpful in the identification and selection of the proper number of periods to employ in a moving average, or what constants to employ in exponential smoothing. Intuitive decisions can then be made regarding which forecasting method generates projections that seem to fit the data set in question. The program might also be rewritten to make it part of an interactive operation thus eliminating the need for computer cards BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY Chapman & Associates. "Using a Computer for Investment Analysis." Broadcast Financial Journal, 7 (January 1978): 24-35. Dickstein, Barry J. "'True' Station Value is Key Ingredient in Broadcast Financing." Broadcast Financial Journal l0 (March 1981): 16-20. Fildes, Robert. "Forecasting: The Issues." In The Handbook of Forecasting: A Manager's Guide, pp. 89-95. Edited by Spyros Makridakis and Steven C. WheéTWright. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1982. Granof, Michael H. Financial Accounting. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1980. Hague, Lee. "Acquisition Financing: An Overview Update." Broadcast Financial Journal, 8 (March 1979): 19-23. Hanke, John E. and Arthur G. Reitsch. Business Forecasting. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc., 1981. Ingle, Kay 0. "Radio Entrepreneurs Fill the Airways." Venture, (1979): 62-64. ~ Makridakis, Spyros and Steven C. Wheelwright. The Handbook of Fore- casting: A Manager's Guide. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1982. . Interactive Forecasting. San Francisco: Holden-Day, Inc., 1978. Meier, Robert C., William T. Newell and Harold Pazer. Simulation in Business and Economics. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1969. Montgomery, Douglas and Lynwood Johnson. Forecasting and Time Series Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1976. National Association of Broadcasters. PurchasinggA Broadcast Station: A Buyer's Guide. Washington: National Association of Broad- casters, 1978. 82 83 Nielsen Station Index. "Buffalo, New York." Viewers in Profile. Northbrook, Illinois: A.C. Nielsen Company, May 1983. PK Services Corp. The Primer on Radio Station Investment. Carmel, California: PK Services Corp., 1979. Poole, Harold. "What's Your Station Worth?" Broadcast Financial Journal, 8 (March 1979): 10-12. Quaal, Ward L. and James A. Brown. Broadcast Management. New York: Hastings House Publishers, 1976. Sansweet, Steven J. "How to Buy Your Own Radio Station." The Green Pages. (1978): 54-55. Schall, Lawrence D. and Charles W. Haley. Introduction to Financial Management. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1980. Schrieber, Albert N., ed. Corporate Simulation Models. Seattle: University of Washington, 1970. Spiro, Herbert T. Finance for the Nonfinancial Manager. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1977. Schutz, David E. “Is That Station Really A Bargain?, Part II." Broadcast Management/Engineering. 14 (August 1978): 86-88. Still, Richard R., Edward W. Cundiff and Norman A.P. Govoni. Sales Management: Decisions, Policies and Cases. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: *Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1076. Sullivan, William G. and Wayne W. Claycombe. Fundamentals of Forecasting. Reston, Virginia: Reston Publishing Company, Inc., 1977. Ungruhe, C. David. "A Comparative Analysis of the Communications Media." Valvation Reporter (First Quarter 1979). Wheelwright, Steven C. and Spyros Makridakis. FOrecastinq Methods for Management. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1973. Weston, J. Fred and Eugene F. Brigham. Essentials of Managerial Finance. Hinsdale, Illinois: The Dreyden Press, 1979. Yadon, Robert E. "Application of Forecasting Techniques to the Telecommunication Industry." East Lansing, Michigan: Department of Telecommunication, College of Communication Arts and Sciences, Michigan State University, 1980. Zwass, Vladimir. Programming in Fortran. New York: Barnes & Nobel Books, 1981. APPENDIX 84 PMDMF =1 CPT 7II175 PROGRAM DELUI 1.6" 6:1. I ot‘DIolIb, ...R ...-at Tau EF2H21U I 9.0066 I) ,D‘F“)o 1.2. 620?.» 66MIT ICS ‘IDO. I).:l. [Brit—EIII‘ I". IIZESI I. IIGL...‘ IR OUTPUT) :S‘u‘, 9‘ )2EIA2)F 1.... Inn-.150 I 61.00.05 I100, (Afl.¢u)s.:o 0U. 6.5.53.5...” SDIDGSAS X IAEIFHI DIM. IS I Is ISIFIIS ..ZE ’6E62721. I 5 IS 1!. I5 I66, TE ET’IIIIQ T1 - SIMSEDESIMSETESIMSEHIONEMAAIONE I E I p T F 0 I INPUTITAPE 6 UN...» .tltFnE. III P05 II. Ire-5.))... T I" Irv)- I210 U... I 0520.16.60 UNA TOS2II5 IBM ISISEORI TIS IEBEISOP U2: .bY [SOSFF FMS A. I O'CSESF NS" 7)... 131E I I I I IEOXILFD) .IIoR 016620 I '0 NE IIIGF’ID ASS GSA... Izlt. U I" IEESISEI LT I ‘0 IEZIIR E I85 IISESA I IM026 IDTDR 0 0 0 .0 JD HRAEIGISERZ .D 0005: 0 0 0 0 AEPNSISZS IO IC:O: : :0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 00000 RG DNA—L DEIFD: 7 ..C075 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 .OOCODDDDOCDDOCDD: : .. : GEL ICE. to ($2 IIYU’SSXAOQW:ID...C~.0: : : .. : : : : : : : = : : : ...- 13.3. D UTA—5M5 I1. I5)(u MM TIMI... .... : : .... :=0123955121.“557991.111z.. RNEBI I)SI(1FUUUDDUU123I§675911111115555555555555XY PIRMDIZAn‘S bFSSSSSSSSSSSS55$R.S$sssssss5555555555583 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 20 25 so 35 49 .5 0 DATA POINTS READ IN NUMbER DF CCCCC 7ccc AND CORRESPONDING DATA READ IN PERIOD E G A Q \I E J V I A A... = G 1. N I T. I V T. 0 I) H 70 I 0 R )Ru 0' 0 IF 1 F A. I 9 xx 71 R (INS E ) IVY N... $5.1... H 01.1... IE U I I‘IIU N 0050! (N 1....(A1AT. 0| OIIDNQTT U 0111.03. AV 9 :IIEOODO N JITP FmJUC 1. a» 1. 1. ....CCC K. 1. 6 7 FIN “05.569 85 1 PHOHP OPT 74/175 PFOGRAM DELUX 0 0 I 0 0 I 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 I . 0 0 I R 0 0 E I 0 A I I U I R T 0 0 L I R A 0 0 A I E D 0 0 V 0 0 0 0 S I .L 0 0 L F. X N H 0 0 A I e o T 0 0 U R I I I 0 0 0 T E 0 2 S H 0 0 I C S R 0 S S 0 U 0 0 I A D I E N R G 0 0 I F. R I R 0 F I 0 0 X D M R F 5 I00 D 0 0 B N I E I E TEE D G 0 0 A T 0 M R All E I 0 0 I, I 2 LFI P L 0 0 I E. A X I .L UIHH.U R Au 0 O .Ax U I ?r I9..L CCIDL H I 0 0 .. H L F I I I 0 P LETEE M U 0 0 IU A 0 0 0 IO M APPIV A B O Q Is V 0 cl 01 I CSOFE S I 0 0 I0 6 0 S SF S D ID I D 0 0 TM I7 N N A EI A LEE...» I a O O 0 6 I 0 c Ira N E ERREE A I 0 O N V [D T. I E )9. I Hr. DAAPR T L 0 0 05A HE S s R I I A3 0 SA E B 0 0 III TO! A S 0 I2 5 A M55 3 I 0 0 S . STA C E F E. L SM TTES U U 0 0 SEO L M E R 0 ID A D NNNRE I A 0 0 ENS ATI R G.I II U 0: IAAAU T A I 0 0 RIM URI 0 E R IF 0 I8 TT L L H D 0 0 GLM D S F R 9 II I R SSSSSA I P A 0 0 E U IEE I TX S p10 ritNNEV U L I I 0 RNS SU E E I $3 E PL IIOOU I. A I. 0 0 I 01. ...—L" L L V .L I R U RRCCLL I H A 0 0 I EI/ RAE P P 0 V2 F0 EE AA N I I 0 0 I2 LSI VE I M I I. F OH SSGGVIN K O 08 0 0 I0 PS) D H 2 T I X )0 O S NN TO II 8 83 0 0 I IV. MET N77 0 L S 7 II R. LEIILIS $3 I II. 0 0 I I0 I IR" A .L 0 U 0 I IF 5 ET MMHHANA KI 5 5 0N0 I I III SGU DB I) M 0 0 VI E 9.5 TITTII'L I2 I I0 0 00 I 20201.... [S SE III I 0 X In» R MA TTODT S II 0 OT 0I0 YIX050SII FR.) ETE III I 0 0 )2 A UC ODIE NI A A I 050 I) GYG0Y0XXI O XX UAC ITT2 X I I II U NE FFMMNHFE II [IE0 I 050 II VDVIDIDID RGG LMN X550 3 A A I2 0 I R ODSSITOM H2 RORGOOI 0E0 II A0AI9I00S SAVV AIE .EE0 I5 8 3 II S 3 E0 T I NI I0IIABS 0R0 YMNN .7.IOIOYI TEAA VTR 377) 9IISII II . HF I) HHFFFFHT I3 OAIIIII .G. doolldIDIYSXSXM NNI. SE J.:.I 91205IJ6X F 5 T 92 TTIIIIT 3I .F..OOD 0E0 IYMVMIIMIDYDXMU EI.B DEFI IAIII 9HI/1/II2 0 F E II 65 60 R2 090080.85 0R0 2MMMM2IUI:D:DUS ILYI EzF 2:IIEEII II 012 I9... I NH II NNII II ”A II ..LIEF. IIIU 0 0 :UUUU:YSMISISS: C x. III—L :III:UEI6I.DI:6IUH 7 IT 57 EECIDIEE 5TTOT00555N 050 ISSSSI:::I:I:=O IEMT AIDM IIOTINITITITIITNU A (A LLIIIILL (ALSASNIIII 0L0 :::: IYIIOIOYS FLUG MI:I (SzIIFAEAEA CAIS M DT DM DM:KHKKDDDT 0P0 ZTXYXSIDIOSOSXX FPSV ITIT ATTIITTMTMTMFTuT: R AA AR .. .. : : .. : : : ARTIRIIAAAN 0 M 0 Mn 35 IMISYSIMM [MIA TSI SSIJNIRIRIR IRV... 0 EH E0 HISSNNHT EOLFOFFEEEO 0I0 OUUVVOYUXYDXDUU 0.1:: SEIT DEEISORDP OR 00000.... F RT RF NNKKKKLL RFXIF IIRRRC 050 DSSAADDSDDSDSSS CSBA EVER DTTEECUFUFUFDUFCS 8 9 3 0 3 O CCCC 1.Cccccccccc O. .5 Iccccc 2 ..JCCC CCCCCC Q 999 2 6 1. 1. ..c rurb 80 as so 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 153 86 “069590 FTN PMDHP =1 OFT 74/175 FROG: M’ DELL‘I R N o. o .b C I 0 ... I . . I R I T t O 2 A O 0 : E o I Q o S L c V t o R F I E o I 0 N F D a t R I I o a R I S a n. n o E 2 R 9 I O F = A t i F I 0 N 3 a I O I O N a I F B I A O O H I I T T a a U I I A S o o S X I O a n I : 5 V 0 0 a I 2 v. I E H a o X o 2 D T I o O 5 I E o I t a I .... G 2 D G S n o 2 F A I R N T a 0 o I R F A I S .5. 9 X ..L I 0 1. D A I on... S I 2 V I N o E C I II. E F I A A R E E I CHI 5 I I I : T T C R 0 0T. A X I N S K X 0 T .0. R 2 .. X D I : E F S .0. . E I D 5 I I R A 0". V a F. I S X T s N C Is. A R 2 S I K L 0 E o n : A o E I I A I R 0L. 5 S U S R 2 H U S 0 0A. N T 0 F G o D D S F OI. I S S I E A T I F. I 0T. V A I R I S S R I oNo 0 I C R F o E G X I .E. SSH c E O = E I .l R E 0 I IN. E o R R X L L R I I to. 567. I O R P = d F I RI .P. AAL - F F. E H E I o ..L n 02 OX. RRB J G I C I L D F 0 0E. EEO I F FYA S N I R P 0 62 o o VVD I O 05R. DA E E H I E1. ID. AA I VE 7. TI I .h I I R RF ON. H 2 5H PAV 0 SR R H S I E II cA. GGT . IIU U IA I IA 0 U I I P IX a . LNI I o SSS SXn AQPV I 0 RN I Z n IE .5. I19 I I E S In In 6 I8. 0A9 0 D T. X X a IX I I at... VV II I VIOII OJIVXIIUVI 0 TI KI Ce 8 9.. X8 [2 .6. OUT IOII ARISX SXAQAXIIX 2 JS IX I5 I OI? I II tAc HHS ISIQ 0 A~I9 I9I3I9F39 .0 I 0 Q9 0 I Y ASSV. o I OR. A JTTIS JVI73I538 I63 I03 IT2T 01.. II B = 5 IB 5X 9E. EEC ISSFE J . (SI I23 III... I. 3 I 0 5:5 3 I 5’ .. I5I : 50 0V . LLE 2...»: O 97.! IT 0 II 0 II II II II 0 0T. IE III II I I III I6: 0A 0 PUR :YYSIUESRIGIDGIéTéI:EIOTD IUéIIEI I6I 6IU I a HUD IooISNlSOIITIITIAITNIT.SoOINITIITNICIRITOIITN .5. IOF 10.5...ISIS:r.AFEAEHEAOEAU..23IIEA IEAO Av2..nuEAI:EAI 0N. SD: ($5....T:: :RTH ITMTP.TMITM :H:3ETTMITHTN5IFTHSITHT oIo ....A ::5IVE?3§IRXIRI3IRSIRR33 INIR IR:: I3IR IIRN oVo AAH . AIZISOVATSROZD ORFR OSFOTTTDFORO..ROXYOIEPOOIROO n0. HHD 355:.5CAVSM HF IHFU HF“.HFKSSDICUFSUFBBDZRUFDZUFC an... SD... 9 O 3 r. A. S a. 6 PC 7 5 h. E P. 3 fl 1. 2 5 5A 6 I 1. I 3 ..J 3 3 .3 5 c. SSCCCCCCCCCCC & O : 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 rd 5 6 .t 7 1 8 e 9 9 o 0 I I I I I I I I I I 2 2 2 2 t 2 o H I I 1. S I I P P I HII N N II UJA ... I I H... NI" 9 H 2 H 59 IAS 2 U 0 U z" IIMH: o N HI IN HIEo¢SSIEI 1.: 2U" H: TUI2::IUH HI ONU UICn ONFNIAINU U C N:N1.N oSHISQ~IH0INI.rH5 I :1... : 38.36.00'! .. : ISST : = :4) INN...» : :NISARANVI? : PUUNM 00. OMOM NHCHOUVHOH NNNSSDSDSCSSSFSCNDDOD . u 5 4 CJ 215 223 2 231‘ 9b 87 FIN 9.8.56Q 0PT=1 PHDHP 741175 PRGBRAH DLLUX 2/INUH1-l) ) o . =DHIODM2 A(HOIONUHI) O D ) H C9 NH"): ..ION 6H 1001).)‘51 QDT .. .. (7415A? .. V1.¢Q(CHHV 0M OHHHABDDO E L B U 0 R D O F R O N F o 665 I NNNN T 11.1.0 ‘ HHHI U vl'lvlol a 000‘ E DOOU HHHG 5 SSS—L N 65 I NN LLLG T. 11 All" 3 NH 1111 I T1 TTTT C 00 NNNS E 30 r..Lr.A R "H NNNC 0 SS COCE F PPPR LL XXXD E II EEF H II T TT [Eff NN LLLH N E: GBP'I 1. UN NUT. 0° RRRS [I 000.! VAN—LE FF'N CTLL E CCCI FOUI IIICGFHOR TYIVIINLSDQI SSSFIO IIFHCLHH ololT—LT I'lvl AA‘OOEIII TTTCOH'IUU SSS HTN [5 ET? DDDH [~55 EEEVLRO“ HHH “APCC olvl'l—IY. XE: OOORTC£RR OOOANT 00 "NH EOEFF SSSPNBL: .. ._ .. ._ EOvIPSS 55$ 9? 091...... EEE‘XARDQI DDCDDDNHFFC 537?..LololFF G. .b 5 4 QCCCCCCCCCCCCC .. c .... 0 5 3 § Q 5 5 2 2 2 2 2 P L I o o 8 . o o 1. I. . t. \r I .l ( Y. s ‘ E S S .l a 1 ) O ‘ ‘l H I P 1‘ L S ‘ E o 0 o a ‘l ‘1 5 o 1.. \l 1 o O \l o I c O 2 1 I H I 6 - o 1‘ P n! I. .1 I s L s,‘ 1 1| E ‘ E1. - 2 S D . T.,)s I ..L O O 0"”: \l S ‘1 1 ’(215 1 9 I 1- Ans.“ . ) H I HE'S. I ) P I 97,52 ( 1 L H LQATO C c ‘ P ‘IJHOI 'I Y. o L .IP’) 0 ..I o I .1 OCLI) \a S 1.). 1. 151.". 1 E ‘1, . «Pb-PH . S 0‘) 12 oDoLP 12 . 2 ’81 ‘0 ’01‘L ‘0 \l . IE‘ 8. 10‘0‘ a. I 0 ‘05 E) (300. T) I. ‘1, sop... 97. S. 030 01 Us 11 [)0 \ll‘ E’O...‘ \l‘ I. on. ST.- 15 DI‘ 0‘ «is o 1.5 \a 0" ..L ol‘IQI ..L A JCE J AS! JID ISAC! JIT DJ” .55 ()JHEC OCF )JHEHOH OCF 20F 35.? $2 OPSS 3A.. ZQPSP)P 3‘: (2L :5: ECZLOE :E) C2LnLIL :T) '- ...-5512).!5'2‘ 05:121-057..“ OA“—LI :IE =I:U )IU::1:2IU ’IU:I=3IS(U )(U ‘0 )NOXCNR’ ).. ..NUION) .1: ..E..N0!0N 16707.1(010151))12‘51111)’0)13(SI (0(TQSSTF(5(IIT§SST(5(IIoITQSST S S“ 7.5MSS 5“" —..-..VS S‘()(‘ EDD-v EDCOOSEOEECEABOODDOEOEABACOOTYO SDSCDFSCSDDDEECDFFCTDTTYmTCDFFC D .U 5.. 6 1 5 2 1. 3 U . E. U 5 “ccccccc o 5 o 5 a £6 0 6 6 7 7 a a 9 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E U LL ‘A '1. T f. LN L IE P UN .1 To R C? cl “x F. N O I N... ‘L ..L B U DU L E0 ‘ To U ‘ "E L IL A 7.5 U SN .l ET. C S A N ED D EN N HI I ol [5 D 8...... E 5 7! E. A CR N NC I ..L' cl R. s F. E F5 F” N I! E 0V [5 :0 UN 5" TI. E [H Dr. 8.... EL O 08 [0 SU CH [0 NS 50 ..L .5. RL 9 O [A ‘EGFI ”LNFT DPIIN 2 ,2 ‘51.)9. \l. I. 1.140 I. (I ‘0 ‘0 ‘, A’ 5.15, A»! "1 7.7.7.1 H! 0!. 5(0( 5‘ F‘ FSFS J . H J . In . F. . .L "s 2 0,0 ,5)“. "IE 9H1: JIEIE 2U(.. 2U‘: OI... 0.: ONV’ 0 NY.) 3'3Y) 1....IE1....IE: :T...1. HI’(UMI’I‘UI")‘ U IONU ION 101n- NII‘SINsrCSIS‘SCS ..1AAY..Q8ATQS\.SS q HHVU. ”i” ......L... UOSSOUODDOOSSDD NDEECNDEECDEECE 1. 7 b 295 360 305 FTN 4.89569 88 PHDMP OPT:1 71’175 PROGPIH DELUX S D E T : R s s I E L 1 R I X I U I 1 D 0 II T I 6 T s T L O 2 E 2 I I I R I U T I. 0 D s 1 F 1. T I TF 0 F. S C T. T O E r. I! I” l R T R” 09. T U .1 I 2 0 .30 2 c. O T 9 I F .I2 I I I I I 4 I H I I. 9 S 5 1 T 1. T 02 1. T 1. I s T T o TF 0 O an E1. F n. 9 5 T S I T I 1. O I R 6 9F T I R 9 I D I T .IX 1 T 1 .33 I 1. T .4 D a» I I S 02 . K T I 1.2 2 c K I I E T I I S I T .. I T I O T T .. a ..L R .... I C I9. 1. R I 2 L2 I 1. P 1 H O I 1 E H I . T 1 1. H I . T F I F C I 1. R 59. T K I H 09. .. T K 1 E I I: 0 .El H T E I E1. nu H T «A D r. R I I F 1F U H G O 1F E U H 2 O G 0 I I I T O N 0 I In T O R N D 9 I. I F S I 1 .LI . T R nu TX I . T. I .K R I E r. X 1:4 J S E 1. (2 U .u S E r. 1 G G 9 I 0 1| 0 V O I O 0 l. I .. P V X I I I H). I. T I I "2 5 1| T S I 6 R R L S I 1| T L L D I I. T l— T T O E r. I .Lz I .1 I .b I .r2 L 11 9 I c. N no I V V U 01. T S T N U 91. I T s T I I N D I I T TF 2 S 1. 1. T TF U T S .... C 11 I TT c T. T I I 1| v c T. T D 9. I l. E R v E If. 0 no I .TI 1 I I fly I .1! 1. I I I R .U n. fl .|( N “N I I9. r. T H I" I.. I9. c. I 1. H O .r I" I .lA I 1. 1 I"! V I. S 1I In. r..L T c. F TM 2 V V X 52 I T E .... I O 02 R V T E T E 5 ID I 0 Au 4 1. 1 .1 I L I; to I a. I F c..L n. TR To In H 1 1:0 T . R .b 10 .10 F. I . R 0 .I n. 0 .00 IT I I T1 T 1 MD 0 U IS 11 OTT H0 0 C U T (F I... I E D ‘F 1. . UT I 0 D . 11F 1.1. UT I H E 0 R 8 T S... I L 0 T. T .6 T NS 0 TT I 0 0L TO 3 H.. NS 0 U R 0 E MT ES I P I 1! ITTT H C! T I! H I II OX 1 UTH ‘9 T S 0 I P .1 Tr. O H R" T3 .TTCYII: U .IL.JIJS .TCCPé. 1 RU.1§..§ SH“. .R 1. 5 RI .r I I T( FT X I E To TIOGUQZN JI 0 1. TOOTR I ED T1 QQIUN JI 0 J1 TO I I 1 J1 . E 3 S P .12 J (1.50.535 . TCV I HT JT1|SSKO 5 FT (2 IS ON . TCV I T KI I Q X (T T: .3 I I T XI TTIIIS . SSJRIT 2 U5 2 TIIITF 5 I S XI 55X . JRIT 2 MG T9 ITSTST IT IT T1T1T1IJT1 HIHHHIJTTIIOB .DN. OHCHHHQTTOTOEJTO TT9J¢I03 .OU. Q3T901151 HO ‘1 OIZXSXOOIX 2UCSSSH‘54CVIO (TzT 2UIDDDO9910XROOX 503((VID 1.INT O1236I311 :5 TI. 2Hn.° 2a I 221. ONIEEESTZB . ‘13 Is It INHEEF‘.51.H32I 2‘9 23 T1|.1|1.3 I2..T. 3’ I I‘d/...I: T5 ..QE '1. 1:.1140..0QE1..M 9 o o OI 1 1...T.| 9 DII‘EI..00 o 9 10 91 13 1:13.». 1 OIIQTT 1 DIT‘E Ola-I OI CI... 1. O TSU61|61|6ISTGTUMISGQZ-J9665R ..GOTO IUHIFSIS666‘GTIISCU66‘35R .. GOTD IU61|11|61161| ITS ISNTTITTT 1..TNU 01.1.531I(50II IS IIHNU OISSITCTI‘TS CTNC‘TISOIC IST9HNCTFTTTCT3..IC (ETEIEICILSEIIN33SSSSSEE‘SHEO..GLAJSINQTQSSSE—LEIEI 09—..ITEEIS‘SHEO ..SB SIEI TIEIEIT.THE STTTHTHTHI9THT :15 .. .. : : ..TT .. : ST .. M .. SET ..QS: ._ ..TTTHTHI TTHTTTH : .. ...UT .. H : BETTPXNTFTMSIUT ....LNIQID‘TRU Ta‘NH ..5‘23...ITR9...TR33 .INH ..BQSTTRIRL IRVTIQERDEIQDD (“1.12.11.51.19 (3.1. T ORORORODOROOUO3IISSVRRITSRTTTOFOUOQISSRRROROIOROORROVITSRTTTOFOROOOROPOOIOR E C HFHF HFIDUFCNDSSSSSIUHVSH HKSSDICNDSSSSUUUFUF UDUFCHUFIVSHUKSSDICUFI FHFHFDTFH I 1 1 1 9 p. 1 8 a. 2 3 48 3 C 9 9 O 99 Q 3 5 9 6 3 4 2 2 2 29 1. 3 Q 3 3 Q7 3 1. 5. 5 .... 5 .3 31C 1 320 325 33C 335 310 315 350 355 360 365 37“ 375 380 8 1. E39 FTN IIB’SEI PHDHP =1 09? 141175 PROGRAM DELUX EXPONENTIAL SHOOTHING'II) D'ISXI'ICTUIL'ISXI'SES'I9II'FORECAST'I6XI'RESIDUA SIXI'OOOEXPONENTIIL SHOOTHING‘Ofi'IIIT O'IIT SXI'SXNGLE ESSOI!) ES F1 2.2.2‘.F1.02T x I T ITIJT IJT I 617 OBIS O9X 2H2, 9.5.5129 E 7 a.» A. 573 393 B a... 395 9‘ 55¢. T TSIT9 TITYISOTIS TTIYII OSI .651 2T 1.! .OF 1‘ I2T UH 0F RESIDUAL SOUIRED= ) )-1IIAVEI-2) ITOIOTSOSSI . 3 TTTTIISOSIESSS OT . TV l(¢(J-3)-1)-1.O)I BEEEEEEESESIJFIJI. OI . I3 5 O1 OI 35R: 15.....SDTSI I I I IEII I IIléT O UEISISII 19°C.UTFFFE01678T5966IISR6 HITITIT 0 ‘..TM...‘ KTRII GTISTDIORIEDESIITILTISTDHTKTR T n O 2 OIIJ-ZTTOISS6T J I I51:T TD 3 ) To: SQXI'DOUBLE EXPONENTTIL SHOOTHING'IIT DES“ 13XI'EI'912XI'E8'IIIXI'FOR '. Lisa-.1; 7 I OU I 0 IT. ITT 9T 9 OJ, OT C9Q16XX O8X2 3....7H787179 I DI (TIE O O O1. O1 O: 91‘... OI 81C IUH OF FORECASTS: 'IFIZIZISXI'SUH OF RESIDUILS= 'IFl GI ea 0 TI 09 93 3 O SUGSGIEII TGIIUSI O O I IIISSSESSIIT9SGI IS ISOENIIITITT ITFNIT IEIEICIXIEITBESPO.$$$SS: :SCFISISEAJ:2EEDTEEEIEISTEI OTEI TTMTVTH:.1THT3S$S$::.... :23:TTH: :..T:H:SSETTTTHTHITTPXTTHTT:= :T:M:hE.LTTTPTr..IFTTM.T ”IRI‘IR 0 1.1V 09: CROROI 09000568911555555RROVITRTTTSOFORRROROEORO TORO IR VITRTTTSOFORROPOTEPPOR CUFHFUFLDUFCDSSSSSSSSSSSSUUFIVSHKSSHDICUHUFUFRDUF I I : : : .. 01.570.11.31 .TR...9 31.103... Q00 405 410 391 Q15 923 C 8 E 425 q 7 6 7 430 a 7 “IT-IVEOOZTIII(J-3T'1T-1.0T P -1) ) ST...- .3... . TV KTRol GTISTDIORIEDESIITILTOSTDHTKTR T a S S I I T T 2 T . 0 J I I 2 IJ .DOOI IT IIDT I51.:T. OXI'OOUbLC EIPONENTIIL SHOOTHI~6 FORECASTS“) DIIIIEII/ 91.. To .- SQII'TRIPLE EXPONENTIAL SHOOTHING'I) EDT OT ...:1112 T51.H3 T. O OT O SU66(6 I(6b(6 I13 OI IS ISTENIITI? .. RIITI ESTSEG: 2EBUIEFIF3T0§FLE INITIRTQC TRZNIRZI..5\DIR)O.L INTI-1.11. (STIR x 2CUF2UIVSHKSSNDICUHFHDTAJUUF U Q35 7 1‘ 390 no aas 453 987 D. 5 5 I69 90 FTN IIBOSbI PHDHP =1 OPT TQIITS DELUI FROGRLM C S I I I T C 9. I I I T 1. I I O E F I I X O O I I 1. T X I I 1 I 3 I I O I O I I I S 2 I I R E I I I T T 2 T I I I E 1. I I I O O F s I I X T O T I I 1 1. X S I I 1. I 1. I I I O S O c I I I T E 2 E O I II T I R I I T O F 2 O I I I I O 1. 1. F 2 I I O0 T F O I I I XS I O R G I I I C. I X T T N T I I 1.L C 1. a K ... 1. I I OI T O I 3 H I I I I U O 2 1. R T 1 I I 1. 50 T I c T o T I I [I z 2 T K o I I I 0 TS I 1. 1. T H 0 I I 1.0 IL 9 F . H S I I I 1 OR T O T D 2 I I DR II O N 3 T L I I I OF. 9 O T 1 o S I T I I TF OI I O J I I J I I R I 5 I 2 I T T I I I ER L O I I I L N c I I Po II T 2 I I E T I I F UL O 1. I T N I. I I N TI T F T 1. 0 TT I I TC CU 1. O 2 I P 1.1. I I 0 I0 I x I T s I II I I [I IT 5 2 I 2 C E TR I I OH OS C O C 1 T TO I I I XE T 2 V S .... F. IF I I "T IR O I I S I L T5 I I S OI T UT I I R P JE I I TI I O 1. 12 T D I 0 1. IT I I SCT DI I F. 1 I T T I R BO I I ACT 06 T OI 1. T o S T D T TT I I CRI TO O X1 $21T O 2 T I Q! I I {op RI T 3F O1. . 3 R T . S R O TI I I FFF ET I OO EST. I O J I T I J1 IDI 0 F PS I 2X c.53JTV O I T K 0. IT I0. FC- I I X 1.2 TTcIRT 2 IJG TTSTT IT IHI HT OICJT O O OTJII‘. . on O I I.) O1. O To I TI [TI IL O3 X2 99I . V0 IT I3T 05/31. :5 IE. H I 3R1...) 9 I 1.3I2I3 .5121 3.3/5: T5 I" I TST 1C:O TZEOOITTO DIITIEOOIOI TO I I T IFIS (1U6615R6 T0: $U6£I6 1.I6 ISI 5 5 TI I TFNIIISOI Is ISI.CNIITI3 ..RI IR I IT: I OTCTI TEESISCO:2CCTTCFIC3T 0C ICI 1. MX9T1.HITTT:::T:M:T9ETTTHT51.FT ITI TIT R5 EIRZNITERDIRJDE INIIRI (51 IN. IF] 0OOROUOORRVITRTTTSOFORROROIER III IFI FI DUSFZCNHIVSHKSSH.DICIUFNDTTU IUI FFR I I I C 3 3 2 3 7 .J 5 3 .3 3 9 9 5 5CCCCCCCCCC E. pl -\ nu I U K. c 6 T 7 8 8 9 9 0 I I I I I I. I 5 0 1. 0 C F L T O I L I N D I 0 N N .o s o 0 I I F S I E S I X S C C 1. R S O o R T 3 N 0 D I T. I c N O O I 2 I D R I T N C D 2 I D C 1. N 1. O 0 R H E F 2 T. T U R O I R T I 2 F. O I 1. P TT T O : F NI I T T T O R 5 o I N N I o N O I E E F II F I N N : RI 0 I I 0 T R RT O H P N 0 CI 5 I R M. .L T PD 0 I C O N C O I P C O I CC 1. I P F NH RT 0 E T H TT CI 0 N N O L F O H T r. C I FR I I T N N 00 O3 F. F I D 0 R XE H O H N 5 SF 15 R C I F. OU S S C R E U0 3 R E F T 5 LC 1.: E U IT O8 T LT L L L VI I N II I I I H L 1. U, 1. 1. 1. L1. TL H O T T T IT 51 I1. LI 1. 1. 1. 1.5 RU I8 IO N N N T... 1. I IE 1. T. T1. 1. Fs I 0 T1. I I 1.- NL K N OT IF O O I O 1.8 Kalo X N1. X X SX I OHS T T I0 TC 0000 OC O0 1.TI 2J T. TSGTI ENTIZBZUTZ XT NI F— R JIL NO 5 OTo OFLTT OT OLT O T. T OS K OTR OI ITTSXS OIIJQIO O60 71.5 EXI O 19’ 1. 1T SHISI TSEHBHIBH 8(T POO 1 JTT . : IC O10 O15: : O1. O1... O1 6 OTNH O1.X ..ru..1.1. HF. IDUSICGITITGISITSI 96IEL6I1 TIJIIILU UNIT IITN IITIT ITT IMNIIT O 1 O VVI IN 9 ..IEINCIFZIEICISFIIOEROTEISH H9 :0. = : 21.1. 9TTTMKTHN€CTMTMPTM TTOPNTPIL1L0.T9TTJJT TNTRIIRO VTRIR IRI TC..:1.RO::: Y. 1.1...:N OTOROFROPOIROROOROIOR OKROILIZOIOIIIFO DTCUFIUFHDSUFUFDUFUGU CKUF RJJDVDVVJJC I I I I 9 9 SOS 350 23 PE PI 5 6 1 7 B 0 9 I. 505 510 515 520 525 530 535 91 FTN QIUOS£O FPDHP =1 OPT 74/175 PhLGFAP DELUI SXI'SHOOTHING CONSTANT OPTIMIZATION ROUTINE'OIIT ILPHI.O1°xO.eETI'O1UXO'GIMHI'O10II'RESIDUIL SUM OF SOU YIJT)/IVIIT-IIIRL’IIOTIZIOT-RJTOPOT : :I = [0 J :IMN OO:J: O0 91O3T 1J1 T1UI OIHUUSSJIT6C6I6I/ J JINOKOI USSII SJIIITITO ...VI 236 O11...KIOIS::EEI...IESEI.III h...V..99JJIJTS:I:9..TSTT9)ETKTHTHS .. : .. : : :I:VI K I. HJI 1:... JVTIIRTD‘... R001OOTJF1OUKOUOUIURROIIRFROROR R8IJDDJRFJCSRDSDSSSHUDSSUIHFUFI I c T c R s 1 R H T ’0 U JO Thu T 5 IT TI J T I 5 1I H O J00 L OD I2 K” L KIKIIBHRTJGTRTI VI KL O KIRSTTLIJTT1O2O .L OOH 1 OFRISQOIISOOIOX TP 11L : 1F/5881T55I1H1: HR. LKT . I1 0 I 2 3 .2 I. Q .35 0 c 9 9 9 1 99 1 1 I 5 O. s a 5 o I I 5 .3 .b 6 1 5 5 S 5 5 5 5 SEARCH FOR" OPTIMUM VALUES C T ) 1 o T 1 2 I I B 5 RT 1 I1 E T. O III. In T .I E 0 I18 O B IUT 2 I IIL I 0 T H81 2 I OI IrDI 1. IOIT INS T 'I IHST IEI T O IIIL ING L X I850 "06 L 2 NPG1 [0” H1 O EMHI NTE LI U2 HEES OTN .5 [IS ONNI I10 TIZOZO IOOT T.I LTIGll TIIT TIT LTIGF TTT12 LIT 11TOOO 1OTII 1‘1 ..ITUXT II18I IHI THIbS OnXu S..IU|. c..A .LUPIUOO III ’TIIT HIT“ LIROfl‘G 111 T1UTI LTT/ TT.HIT III I“ BU GUT 1I’LH =1IT TLTIZT DOD EKI Kb KLLGIITXX1 LII1 HITITS I86 BOA O8 OITGYH10.NT1YUI LILTFE I], I1. 1. 11I.IIIT)OUTII' ITIOOe TTT [:0 :0 ==EOIIY1T2L0IIITTTT1XCI DD LLL ODOCII JI KLVIIHIIL:OIHUILGIIZZIIHG HA IRG IIII11 T1 TTIIABIAIIIOAHOIIIYozileHDII . . . 0001 : : S:IBGB1. (CIBGLTHIéIG:B:EG HH UUUL: .. .. ..SILOB 56: G: : GIITD I: : ......LI I IT II : I : I BI IBGITTTTBIBCBLFOTSTT::YOOLTT):L:HEAUHAHTGBA III:SSSS1Hz1HG11LH11TTI1H111LT1TETHEDTMc5:: :::JEEEE £4 E: TEIIIA: :(IITLTI:I?(LEAE:JI AHGABBBBONBONGOOINABIHHOLFAEILFHHRUFABGBbBA KKKIIBGEDOBDOGOOSOUHSIEDTIHHSTIIEUFIHUHEGBA 10 ‘2‘} Q .A..Al~ 6 8 o c 1 1 lTol 137 575 583 585 590 595 60C 0 blu 615 92 FTN ‘06’56Q PMDMP =1 OPT TQIITS PROGRAN DELUX '!F120295XO'GANHA= '9F12.2) N6 CDNSYANTS ARE SPECIFIED AS3'QI) HUM SHOOYHING COVSTANTS ‘RE:'Q’, UFIFUFI .‘fdr‘ 3 lord... 1 ‘oll 'o 62 FORECAST HIT" OPTIHUH SHOOTHING CONSTANYS 625 , ’ 1 . I ‘ a U 0’ )1; 1. ) .1 o .11) B (BL I 1 ANY; 0 1 HI- R 1‘ ‘Bs 1 (a OBI IOI RHG R85 REG A .5, MN" ‘0 HEM... [0... T [PEI NON L NHNT 010 L OEOL I). H1 ONO- ’1’ LI. .1015 1 .1 . S )I)I L11 .II 111) 1“ L) (0‘) (AA L) 2 5AA... ‘1 SH” 11 ) I /.U‘ 1 l.’ :l‘ 1 1I ’iila ‘ .l": Thu ‘ I!) I ‘11)” F 1195 Lu- F 11 HINT-3.1. . H‘C‘ LI . In; FTHYACT ) LYAY 1T 1 RR HirLEAl-HYL \: T 2) :‘U‘ ’L)?! ‘9 LLABGII‘I‘N 1 L I)... LI‘I ”NIL so... 1UHUII I I I. I I1N11AIA LICI)BSL 1C . . . HAI’ F 1 1.! 0U1HAH) I1F11IH O ..LOOOPTH1I... C 1R2LOPTPLTTI:_I(IU1 LVoooLEHC1) Y ((:OoLEAILGl)YRDS: o 0 IA111AHARCT ..‘IRSIIOABG‘Q OAT... 0‘51 5 0 o S: .. :HUGUSL 011:8 (EHHHSLTHL1HM .. o: .0 5.. ‘85.. ..H‘: 90.!10‘60 0.. = .. ..1L‘ITUX080)1°: 11APG),::11:LRS:1.OL)))):L=ILS:51:19 :2 1LHHH11)’1() I : u. 01H111L1711l I : 0H1111—LE 1r...:..((11.|P11qUR : (((1(L(IPII RU 1? NH H O(NNNABCCSF((USHOLFAH(SLFCFCUMSO(F:UU DSOOOHUSFSFRRSUXDXIHUSSIIFFRSIUDRFJSS . 5 7 6 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 5 U 5 0 5 0 3 3 R Q 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 START THE FORECASTING PHASE 665 O, 2 F I, 1 9 'l O t I NI 0 [L X : NA 5 L DU 9 A D D 2 U M1 I 0 DC. 2 1 CE 1 S \a R F E I .II 0 R I V I I '.LI 7 E I N9 I. G 1 E R O 2 A I- S ”I I P 1 an RL ’2 E . H EC 11 V I P PO ‘3. A ..I I 0 R Q I B N I" 0x I H 0 I ,7 X I, I 90 1 O ,6 )1. 1 IL (09 I I... N I 9' P O .2. .1 7. Nvl F2 I 1‘) 1 01 F1 2 ‘.8:- L IF 0.? 1 )‘HI ‘ TI \1 O F LuIl‘ I ‘ 0 1x O 1‘85 II VI CQ I ‘IBI 1 R“ s 9 1 SANG N E 0 52 c : IAEG 1 SI 0 I I S )HNH BR )2 1 L ’50.... E C0 11 . A .ININ H I 'l (r- T U L010 T 9C B I H D - 0’. NA ”x 1| 1 1,11 F 5...: 91. I S '1 o I! o 9 ’1 \I E 8L1... I L I O 2 R HICC T 0‘ (2 I I‘ll U 0N R I I F TSHU P 10 H2 ..L r20 Ll . I 2 9| RS 91 V V X1), I U ER 1.? A An. 0111 I 0 Fr... 1 I. U HU “H"!l‘ \l ‘1 I I s ‘N I 95 LT'RY I I 9 OI '5 T) MI :LI‘HI. I." X X. 0. UR U. U L.I(I P18 0 0x113 .A S! N111! IA Fl. o)5)17N)1 OVT)9 OH)(H|H)FR220390050 TSUU63 JLCAPTHL.¢E2120-1ZI “MC/29 : O IULEAI’EH1H1HD:1E IUT01/ IIECABGIIHU9191N101 MSRAOI 1L:HUUS‘U56‘6(E 6‘ UHOH b- 00 I): : : : VS : ‘T(TRQ(II S‘SX‘Y 20L1))))::2EAEAT2EA 1::::£A IHICIILI)ESTMTH-1TH NCPDDYM _. (D ((I‘Ilv "1‘1; 9 13": ““T‘Ia OLFFAB(S(UUROROXOR02TAVSH90 DIIFHHSSRSSHFHFéDIFoHHHHIhF I I 1 «J 2 3 ‘5 F 2 2 2 2 22 s 1 1 1A 1 11A 1 610 675 683 685 :9" 93 FT" .IB‘SE. PPDFP =1 OPT 74/175 PROGPAM DLLUX S I 5 S I I 1 I C X S C r. 6 E R I G R O I N 0 F, T 1 F I N K I F. C E I N A 6 5 O R I I P T R I H I E c. 0 I V D C I I 0 1 T 1 I 1. T 2 ca 2 I 1 1 R N I I I x I I r. E 2 I 2 5 1 I I P. N .1 R 1 I I 2 .I I I r. 0 1 F 2 n I I I H I R I I I O 2 I I I” I R I I 2 H 1 F. 1 .L T E I T 1 T F 1 cu I P I I R I F E I I I 1. I 9. I 0 2 I H I R H 1 I I X R I I T P I X 2 8 R 2 S 1 : K I 9 .1 1. E 1 : P T N : 5 : I I I F S E . D R N 1 I I.I I h. I R T I I T 1 5’ N 1! T E I D N I T K T 151 0 (5 c. H 5 R I U I 1 S I 1 (II I .I cuI R N N 1 H I NI T 52 C 0 T2 1 E I V D C 05 I I I F. O N I o G S E T P. SD '1 12 R N I2 I T N S D S .K I0 n3: 1;; O Q. C1. .5 S 1 I U 0 r?;.LI Ir..r I TF . I S 1 E o r..2K S- D nu! I o D “I. N a» U ) T T .L BR A “IX .I I A II In E H U L F EP 00 N I1 I e H 11 I! R 1 s N L I 0 HI I7. I s:1 8 I I 131 .I 0 0 T. ‘1 O 1 T I IC I T. I I I I I. I 1 F. 1 s 81 S T. T I II 9 I2 I R 9 R2 2 s I H1 D B C U F1 5F I I. D O I I. I 5F 0 S C c? T A R P.nuI I .9 H2 nu R o ‘5‘ I '0 T. C r. 1F 5 I T 3 I L I I1 1 R I 11 ... I s I R 1.? U N R U H1 DI Z1 1.? R E Z1 If v N” N 1 1 o a! I I I 1 O OTT I 0“ U1 1 I E “1 P I I IU1 I 1 1 F 11 .PnFL 0 I I.LGI .10 IT. (in P I .1. .PX H r§§2R 1 .2 a‘ 1 I T1. AAM o D I" II" Rh. 91 III I N 9( :30 01MB 25 1 I .u N o. 0‘ VMI 2 1T T INF—s .LI IR I I I U IR I I NRU 2' I1 I s o X 11 “X I . CNS K CLLT. PE H 0‘ 13 I c N at. 1‘. XISX1N "9.11 “IN N 5 C NT 11! (TIN 1151I 1IS N IS 1115 1I N IS 11 N.V19F1 NFCI NF N15) IT N11 .219 0:71. I0.{.ll2oi I 1nfiK35991..30, I 1Bnfi¥aI I297i915 IFPI. 2L IQ.i.nuI_¢09 023 ON T 0313XH3X I J11III3X5 I 3X J11III5X IEC3 II 0 1 2 J . FR JO 1.5/30 :1 ISI 31 I T I : G 31H16115X ..IaII ""1611, 10 =11 I ""15 EHT1I 3 o 2 . 3:1... .. :0 One/.... I1: “I50. I II Sn...‘ IF. I 1 1T 19 1(R1II I1 I, I? 1‘R1XI I11MUR II: I HUTNPIII 12:11.}. I II 5T1 I I I 66( Ho 1U56¢6C 6(0 Raul/6(6I 6( RIo/ISCNUSGé‘RélLLLLL IZIU SU16(6:. 1:66 ICT :281N((T‘TU(TI0°.I10TZCT¢T1CT002I10TZIT.SIS‘TO‘IIIIIIOT1IN1SNI‘TI115:1(( 1EEI0M : 2115?.IEIIEID I ISV. I: WHEIEII [I I IST I :UHEIH: .. ..EIR—LN21315 :5015:1:EIE1¢511EE 2TTM..DOIPTTTMTFETHNCDIHDD:..TNTHSTNCG1HCD: ..THNGPDTHRTL..: .... ..11..$Tq.r.THTHT (H¢.I(TT 01.1RRTT (‘11.! 1.11.1.1... : : : .. A. .51: In. LIR : : : .. A351? : VAT..52L1 : 121.35 IZIV INEID 1.: N (D 1.1 «SHROTéibOCAYhRCRn..KORY5EV-ZMTéJKORdifu0Y5§UTZMT§A§UNAUEERU RUPTBCIPOIififOO:X§2HORF}1U1FPRP .JHHrLRIIDI:EIHFUBEKHFTL!HDUH:3IHUKLEPNHELEUDUH33IHIFLEIUHHEBLILIF???LDR¢§ECDQF§TUFHFnglrUH I I I I I T In a 1. 2 5 .Q6 Iv 3 21. T o .1 I 5 2 2 tucé I. 3 33 £4 3 Rad 3 5 la 5 5 1. 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 11 1 1 1 5 c . 695 700 7C5 710 715 729 725 739 735 TIC 745 750 755 760 76‘ 770 94 FTN “I595EQ PHDHP =1 OFT 74/175 PF CGF AP DELUX D .U H T E R G N I T S I 1 1 1 C $— 2 2 E I I I R I I I 0 1 I. 1 F 1 F ..r F I 1 1 I I I T R 2 2 In K I S C I I I. Q I r. R 1 I. I I I I a R 3. 1 1 I I I L I F .I G G G E I I I N N N H —.. 1 x X I III III 1 T R F 1 1 H H H 2 I I 1 1 T T T I I U X I I 0 0 O I. S C ... I I O C O 1 R S 1 E E H H H ..r E I G G s S S I T 1 M» I I I X f. I I N R R l. L I. 8 H S r. o E r. I I I 1 I 1 H 1 V V 1 1 1 I R C. I s ‘ I T T T I A T I S N N N D P L I r. G G r. .... f. 0 I I. R N N N N N H N N 1 G 1 1 O 0 O T ..L I I r. V V P P P E V I R o o I I I H 1 D D H H E E E G 0 0 E S .H H .L E r..t E r..K G T In P .L L .L L I..L N E E HAPIBSGSBSR T 1 M. H 1HMRUF.NEUE1 N S I IPSSIDCS150TRH1 U I It; ESEnJC.anhLET—Lnl I x XeeISISI SI SI SI SI I 1 INXNIM IRIHIHIHI X 1...].3 13R:.I.345Q5Q54r4 I H9/9/9 I9 I9 I9 I9 I9 I61 1 I, I, I, I, I, I, I’ I, I, I6I6I6I6I6I6I6I6I6I 9 .. 1 ... 3 I 5 6 7 .J I I. ... c: 5 5 5 ... .3 5 c a. 9 9 9 O. u; 9 9 .t C. (L f. T b e T 7 7 793 5935 n 35 35 5 63... 75 8 15 2 I 0111 111 11 1 011 01 I. 11 1 06666116650266036OIO 666055°6n666c60760890 1:1 p0 0f. AU K. .‘ . 1. 0. .fi. .JGEALF. 600006.9000660°6606665000600606600606606F.66 TTTT TTT TT T 2TTT TT T TT T T 0 00 00 00 0006 0 0 00 0 00 0000 TOOOOTTOOOTTOOTTOTTT OOOTOOTOTTCOTOTTOTTTT 5556 555 55 G 0556 56 5 GB 5 G 01111 U01110011001000T11101101.U011010010000 GISSSGGSSSGGSSGGSBGG SSSGSSGSGGSSGSGGSGGGG 1NEEE11EEE11EE11E111OEEE1EE1E11EE1E11E1111 IDSDTUISDTHSOTHSTLSHGSDTHDTUTUUDTUTUNTHNU" REEEEERLELEEEEELEEEL1EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESE SSCLC.SSDSI.SSCISSSDCISTC.HCISQ.IIC.SSc.cu$c.ss.bssssscus EHHHHHEHHHHEHHHEHHEHEHHHHMHMHHHHHHHHHHHHH" SIIIIISIIIIQLIIISIISICUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 9'0! U1NTERS METHOD "'1 HTTTTTRTTTTHTTTMTTHTHTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT1X 1X ILLLLL ILLLL ILLL ILL Il. ILLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLIIO 13 TIIIIITIIIITIIITIITITIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIu‘. .35 LIISSSLISSSLSSSLSSLSLISSSISSASIISSISISSSSSB I86 I85. I86 I36 I8 IMMErF. IHEEE IECC ICE or. IM_._EEM...FMEMHEEPEHEEEEE II... II... II... II... II... RSDSDTRDSDTRSDTRDTRTRSSDTSDTSTSDDTDTDSTSDT6I6EI66I66I66I6 TITITITITITITITITIT1EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEPLEEEEEEEEEEEIT IT IT IT IT IEAr.IEIEIEIEIEI—LAEII SSSSC.SSSSSC¢SSSSSc.c..$$$<.<.sssss(ISSSSSSCVSSSSSSEAOEIOEIOEIOEIO MTPTHTMTHTMTMTMTHTW..MPMMM MHMMIHHI PMHHFHMMPMHRMRMHMVHNNMNPPMMMMTPTTMTTFTTM TTHT R13.IRIRTRIRTRIRIRTRSIIIIIIIII. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIR IR 13. 13‘ 13‘ OFOROROROROROROROROIFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFRODROORUOROOROO F HF HF IFUF IF HF IF HF IF 111111111111111111111111111111.11111111111UFGUFGUFGHFGUF G 0 1 2 1. I... .t 7 an. 1 23 I... 2 0 0 0 fish. 0 a 51 1 11 11 6 6 6 b 66 .t E 6‘. 6 66 6:. K. II .5. o .3 0 cw. p. 9 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 T H. 8 8 8 8 8 8 1 97 ... CR. ..c 66 to 0". TRIPLE EXPONENTIAL SHOUTHING II.) I... SIMPLE REGRESSIDN 00‘) 1X 28 55 ‘7‘ bi. 25 2.. 66 .LE .U I. .5 1R 36 5:: I... SIMPLE MOVING AVERAGES 00') be"' DOUBLE MOVING IVERAGES 'I'1 I1 5 5 T“ «be EIS I"‘ DOUBLE EXPDNENTIAL SROOTHING 0") I"' SINGLE EXPONENTIIL SHOOTHING I0'1 1 III'THIS IS THE LAST PAGE SO THROI 1T ABAV'1 1‘ 1x 6 I66 IE9H DIE. III. .1 6|66I66I IT IT IT [ACEIOEI Tu: TTM, TTM-P To“ 1" 1‘7. 3 RCOROOROTN HFGUFGUFSE I... 96 BI E‘. LEE 109 USC 855 llllll\\|H\\|\||lH|lNIH"H 1293 03085 4 N||I||| U“ E“ Tllll A“ I" I“ H ll'lll 594 3