.. ..., :21 .4.\_.Q. . 1. ‘ . .. . .1: a .4“. I? .. 1.. ....,..v.... . ‘ 9....» Degree 5 far} >i mt. 1h i. \..5...c. 3....;..,.a......:x.v>:.t ; . i A .. V . ‘ ..r v 0’ . .. r ‘ .. . c . . 4 . . 7 . . .V a ‘ .. M . .. . ,3 .. x. . ‘7 , . . , 1 ‘ . a. A A 0.5.5914... ... . .751: ‘1 r2.) . . . l ‘A..lll‘ .‘s‘;. c. C‘, a»... .z, . v I... «1.2.1: b.a.4 7:4 . .i...zr.:.xx.ofi Lbkfiiwsv. , fiéfiwgfi? u IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII WWW WWW WWWWWW WW ‘ WWWWW 319 300 0069 6611 This is to certify that the thesis entitled Transport Phenomena in Porous Media With Enphaais on Water W in Soils presented by Laurence Thomas Novak has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for Chemicalw Ph'D‘ degree in f % e a /LW 618110: professor Date August 9, 1972 0-7 639 h‘ n. .‘m-'-€—Tam3"ml:! - $.- LIB I? 141 I“ Y I Michigan I" u. Univ crsicy ' I Uh}; a“. 5 ’ : 3“ ' { 3M 3! H290 .H .t" med” [“1 "V. ‘7; Mr «.2 7a 1m 34.9.: g 10} mo . (:1 4 I). ABSTRACT TRANSPORT PHENOMENA IN POROUS MEDIA WITH EMPHASIS ON WATER MOVEMENT IN SOILS BY Lawrence Thomas Novak Unrestricted dumping of domestic and industrial waste water into the waterways will be a thing of the past in the United States. Stringent federal standards will require that waste water be treated before being returned to the waterways. One method of treating this waste water is by spray irrigation of the soil mantle. In order to successfully design and manage a spray irrigation facility, mathematical models are required which will predict the movement of water and chemical compounds in the soil. This work addresses itself to modeling the water movement in soils. One objective of this work is to develOp a general model for water movement in soils. This model is then compared to less general models which have previously been proposed to describe water movement in soils. Another objective is to test the models by comparing the simulation results with the experimental results. -Lawrence Thomas Novak The general model was derived by making material balances on water in the liquid and vapor form, and by making an energy balance on the soil. This resulted in a set of transport equations which describe the movement of water and energy in the soils. The novel feature of this model is that the condition of interphase vapor-liquid equilibrium is not assumed. This equilibrium assumption was the basis of an earlier model for water movement in soils which was developed by Philip and DeVries. The unsteady state numerical solution was develoPed for the general model, Philip and DeVries model, and the isothermal equation. An explicit finite difference technique was used in the numerical solutions. The unsteady state solution to the Philip and DeVries model has not been obtained prior to this work. With the numerical solution to the above models, soil drying simulations were run and the results were compared to experimental results. It was found that even with dry soils the inter- phase vapor-liquid assumption is valid. Furthermore, the isothermal equation and Philip and DeVries model give essentially the same drying saturation profiles when identical irreducible saturations are used in the models. Good agreement was obtained between calculated and experimental drying saturation profiles. Lawrence Thomas Novak The solution to the Philip and DeVries model developed in this work should be useful in problems involving drying of soils or porous media where a predictive capability is needed. The general model will also be useful in these types of problems to evaluate the interphase vapor-liquid equilibrium assumption upon which the Philip and DeVries model is based. For soils which are above the irreducible saturation, the isothermal equation for water movement would be the most expedient model to use if soil temperature informa- tion was not desired. In particular, the isothermal equation would be a good base for structuring models to describe the movement of chemical compounds in soils subjected to spray irrigation with liquid wastes. TRANSPORT PHENOMENA IN POROUS MEDIA WITH EMPHASIS ON WATER MOVEMENT IN SOILS BY Lawrence Thomas Novak A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Chemical Engineering 1972 \Jf‘x , DEDICATION In memory of my father, John A. Novak ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author would like to express his appreciation to his major professor, Dr. George Coulman, for his interest and guidance in this work. Appreciation is also extended to Drs. Myron Chetrick, Carl CooPer, and William COOper for their participation in this work. The author is greatly indebted to the Diamond Shamrock Foundation and the National Science Foundation (Grant GI-20) for financial support. Special thanks are due to my wife Donna for her moral support throughout this work and for her help in preparation of this thesis. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION '. . . . . . . . . . . . . ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. . . . . . . . . . . . LIST OF TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . LIST OF FIGURES. . . . . . . . . . . . NOMENCLATURE. . . . . . . . . . . . . Chapter I INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . II THEORY . . . . . . . . . . . . III IV Derivation of the Macrosc0pic Equation of Continuity for Liquid Phase Water in the SOil. O O O I O I O I O O O O Derivation of the Macrosc0pic Equation of Continuity for Water Vapor in the Soil . Derivation of the Macrosc0pic Equation of Energy for the Soil. . . . . . . . Model Parameters. . . . . . . . . General Model for Water Movement in Soils under the Condition of Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium . . . . . . . . . . NUMERICAL SIMULATION . . . . . . . RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. . . . . . . CONCLUSIONS 0 I O O O O O O O 0 iv Page ii iii vi vii ix 13 15 l6 I9 38 41 51 108 REFERENCES I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX A CAPILLARY POTENTIAL AS A FUNCTION OF SATURATION, TEMPERATURE, HISTORY, AND COMPOSITION. . . . . . . . . ANALOGY BETWEEN THE ISOTHERMAL EQUATION OF GARDNER AND THE UNSTEADY STATE DIFFUSION EQUAT ION I I I I I I I I I I THREE DIMENSIONAL EQUATIONS OF CHANGE FOR POROUS MEDIA . . . . . . . . LIQUID WATER VAPOR PRESSURE AS A FUNCTION OF TEMPERATURE, SATURATION, AND COMPOSITIONI I I I I I I I I INTERFACIAL AREA MODEL (SIMPLE CUBIC PACKING OF RODS) AND COMPUTER PROGRAM. . . COMPUTER PROGRAM SUBROUTINES CONTAINING PHYSICAL PROPERTY DATA . . . . . COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR NUMERICAL SOLUTION THE GENERAL MODEL. . . . . . . COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR NUMERICAL SOLUTION THE PHILIP AND DE VRIES MODEL. . . COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR NUMERICAL SOLUTION THE ISOTHERMAL EQUATION. . . . . OVER ALL WALL HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT CALCULATION. . . . . . . . . SURFACE FILM COEFFICIENTS. . . . . CALCULATION OF PART OF THE CAPILLARY POTENTIAL-SATURATION FUNCTION FOR VALENTINE SAND. . . . . . . . COMPARISON OF CONDUCTIVE ENERGY FLUX AND CONVECTIVE ENERGY FLUXES . . . . COMPUTER PROGRAM SUBROUTINES CONTAINING NATURAL WEATHER TIME VARYING BOUNDARY CONDITIONS I I I I I I I I I V T0 T0 TO Page 112 116 119 121 123 127 142 154 165 176 184 188 191 193 196 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. LIST OF TABLES Page Legend for figure 12 . . . . . . . . 44 Simulation problems. . . . . . . . . 52 Simulation parameters for simulation number 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 56 Simulation parameters for simulation number 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 57 Simulation parameters for simulation numbers 3'4, and 6 I I I I I I I I I I I 63 Simulation parameters for simulation number 5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 7i Material and energy fluxes during drying (simulation number 5) . . . . . . . 78 Simulation parameters for simulation number 7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 81 Simulation parameters for simulation number 8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 85 Simulation number 8 results . . . . . . 86 Simulation parameters for simulation number 9 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 87 Simulation parameters for simulation number lOI I I I I I I I I I I I I I 89 Simulation parameters for simulation number llI I I I I I I I I I I I I I 94 Maximum daily soil temperature changes over an annual cycle at Argonne, Ill.. . . . 107 vi Figure 12. 13. 14. 15. 16 17. 18. LIST OF FIGURES Differential element in a soil column . . . . Interfacial area model . . . . . . . . . Interfacial area per volume versus soil satura- tion I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Hydraulic conductivity versus soil saturation . Hydraulic conductivity versus soil saturation . Hydraulic conductivity versus sOil saturation . Capillary potential versus soil saturation . . Capillary potential versus soil saturation . . Capillary potential versus soil saturation . . Capillary potential versus soil saturation . . Effective thermal conductivity and volumetric heat capacity versus soil saturation. . . . Diagram of sand column for drying problems . . Soil saturation versus depth of soil (simulation numbers 1 and 2) . . . . . . . . . Soil temperature versus depth of soil (simula- tion number 2) . . . . . . . . . . . Equilibrium mole fraction of soil water vapor versus depth of soil (simulation number 2). . Soil saturation versus depth of soil (simulation nulrlber 3) I I I I I I I I I I I I I Soil saturation versus depth of soil (simulation number 6). . . . . . . . . . . . . Cumulative evaporation versus time (simulation numbers 3,4, and 6) . . . . . . . . . vii Page 25 27 29 3O 31 34 35 36 39 58 59 6O 64 66 67 Figure. 19I 2()I 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27I 28. 29. 30,31 32,33 34,35 36. 37. Soil saturation versus depth of soil (simula— tion numbers 4 and 5). . . . . . . . . Soil temperature versus depth of soil (simula- tion number 5) . . . . . . . . . . . Equilibrium mole fraction of soil water versus depth of soil (simulation number 5) . . . . Surface vapor flux versus time (simulation number 5) I I I I I I I I I I I I I Surface mole fraction of soil water vapor versus time (simulation number 7) . . . . . . . Surface mole fraction of soil water vapor versus time (simulation number 9) . . . . . . . Surface mole fraction of soil water vapor versus time (simulation number 10). . . . . . . Boundary conditions for simulation number ll (solar radiation flux versus time) . . . . Boundary conditions for simulation number 11 (ambient temperature versus time). . . . . Boundary conditions for simulation number 11 (ambient relative humidity versus time). . . Boundary conditions for simulation number 11 (wind speed versus time). . . . . . . . Soil temperature versus time, z=0 (simulation number 11) . . . . . . . . . . . . Soil temperature versus time, z=9 cm. (simula- tion nurrlber 11) I I I I I I I I I I I Soil temperature versus time, 2:18 cm. (simula— tion number 11). . . . . . . . . . . Soil saturation versus depth of soil (simula- tion number 11) I I I I I I I I I I I Interfacial area model (simple cubic packing of rods) . . . . . . . . . . . viii Page 68 73 74 77 83 92 93 95 96 97 98 100-101 102-103 104-105 106 129 02 C191 3’ O! £=*£ NOMENCLATURE Cross sectional area of soil column (cmz) Interfacial area per volume (cm-l) Molar concentration of gas phase (gm.mole/cm3) Molar concentration of water vapor (gm.mole/cm3) Equilibrium molar concentration of water vapor (gm.mole/cm3) Volumetric heat capacity of soil (cal./cm3-OK) Heat capacity (cal./gm.—OK) Diffusion coefficient for water vapor in soil (cmZ/day) Ordinary diffusion coefficient for water vapor in air (cmZ/day) Inside column diameter (cm) Outside column diameter (cm) Particle or droplet diameter (cm) Outside column wall diameter (cm) Parameters in the equations of Philip and De Vries Interphase evaporation rate (gm./cm3-day) Enthalpy of vaporization for water (cal./gm.) Film coefficient for heat transfer (cal/cmz—day—OK) ix WWW m,s N 7’. W 28 2 £3 1:" 28 w,c Surface film coefficient for heat transfer (cal./cm2-day-0K) Thermal conductivity (cal./cm-day9K) Effective thermal conductivity (cal./cm—day-°K) Film coefficient for mass transfer (cm/day) Surface film coefficient for mass transfer (cm/day) Hydraulic conductivity (cmz/day) Over all interphase mass transfer coefficient (cm/day) Column length (cm) Molecular weight of water (gm./gm.mole)_ Molar flux of water vapor with respect to fixed coordinates (gm.mole/cmZ—day) Convective molar flux of water vapor at the soil-atmosphere interface (gm.mole/cmZ-day) Partial pressure of water in the gas phase (atm.) Total pressure (atm.) Total gas phase pressure (atm.) Capillary pressure (cm) 1 Vapor pressure of liquid water (atm.) Total energy flux (cal./cm2-day) Convective energy flux (cal./cm2-day) Radiative energy flux (cal./cm2-day) Volumetric flow rate (cm3/day) Radius of capillary (cm) Gas law constant (atm.cm3/gm.mole—°K) Saturation = volume of liquid water per volume of gas and liquid in soil (dimensionless) X (0| 0 <: <2 2"“;sz 2 <: <: <6 NC" A Nu= Nu = Pr= Saturation = volume of water per volume of gas and liquid in soil (dim.) Time variable (day) Temperature (OK) Ambient temperature (OK) Internal energy (ca1./gm.) Over all column wall heat transfer coefficient (cal./cm2-day-0K) Molar volume (cm3/gm.mole) Volumetric flux of liquid water (cm/day) Volumetric flux of water (cm/day) Molar average velocity (cm/day) Velocity of component i with respect to fixed coordinates (cm/day) Width of soil column (cm) Mole fraction of water in the gas phase (dim.) Equilibrium mole fraction of water in the gas phase (dim.) Ambient mole fraction of water in the gas phase (dim.) Spatial variable (cm) Dimensionles Number Particle Nusselt number Nusselt number Prandtl number ——EE—- Particle Reynolds number xi Re SC VL aw = Reynolds number = Schmidt number -—-11J3 Particle Sherwood number Sherwood number Greek Symbols Porosity or void fraction (dim.) Total potential (cm) Capillary potential (cm) Water content soil (dim.) liquid water volume per volume of Water content = water volume per volume of soil (dim.) Concentration of component i (gm. mole/cm3) Viscosity (gm./cm—day) Density (gm./cm3) Effective conductivity and part of the distillation effect--see the equations of Philip and De Vries Surface tension (or free energy) (dyne/cm) Shape factor (dim.) Channeling factor (dim.) Conversion factor (1.01324 x 106 dyne/cmZ—atm.) Subscript Vapor-liquid liquid air-water gas xii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION There is a growing desire today to achieve a cleaner aquatic environment by cleaning up domestic and industrial waste water. One method of treating waste water is by spray irrigation of the soil mantle. This method is gaining popularity in areas where inexpensive land is available. The soil mantle can act as a living filter. As waste water trickles down through the soil, some chemical compounds are adsorbed onto soil particles. Others are absorbed by the roots of surface vegatation. Also, microbial life in the soil feed on suspended solids and soluble chemical compounds in the water and convert them into microbial biomass and other chemical compounds which are excreted. Chemical compounds which are not accumulated into the biomass of surface vegetation or soil organisms, will accumulate in the soil. As this accumulation continues, the soil becomes saturated and these chemical compounds eventually wash downward into the water table. A manage? ment goal of a spray irrigation facility would be to minimize the amount of chemical compounds entering the water table. It can be seen from the above discussion, that the water acts as a carrier of chemical compounds in the soil. In order to successfully design and manage a soil mantle Spray irrigation facility, one would like to be able to predict the outcome of various spraying policies. To do this a model is required which could accurately predict water movement in soils over a range of operating conditions. The water model would be the foundation upon which other models could be built. For example, a model to describe phosphorous movement in soils would recognize that soluble phosphorous compounds move with the soil water and are adsorbed or desorbed from the soil particles and also taken up by the roots of terrestrial vegetation. The objectives of this work are to develOp a general model for water movement in soils and to compare this model to less general models which have been prOposed to descibe water movement in soils. Another objective is to test the models by comparing the simulation results with experimental results. The first model to describe water movement in soils was prOposed by Darcy in 1856. Darcy studied the flow of water through the sand filters of Dijon, France and con- cluded that the volumetric flow rate of water could be predicted by the following empirical equation [1]. (1.1) Q = VOA = - KA(A—IP:—) Equation (1.1) is called Darcy's law and states that the volumetric flow rate of water is prOportional to the pressure drOp (AP) across a sand column of length L. The prOportionality constant is the product of the hydraulic conductivity (K) and the column cross sectional area (A). Hydraulic conductivity is a function of the water viscosity, the particle sizes, and the particle size distribution of the porous media. Darcy's law has been found valid for low flow rates in porous media. DQD = ___B (1.2) Rep Au <1 This is because at low flow rates, the frictional forces outweigh the inertial forces [2]. The type of flow problem studied by Darcy is described by the terms saturated, isothermal, and steady state flow. A saturated porous media or soil consists of two phases: liquid and solid. When the volumetric flux (V0) of water through a constant temperature soil does not change with time, the flow is said to be steady state and isothermal. Water flow in soils also occurs when a gas phase is present in the soil. This type of flow is called unsaturated. Collis-George experimentally verified that Darcy's law holds for unsaturated flow if the driving force is changed from a pressure gradient to a potential gradient [3]. O (1.3) V = -KV® where, (1.4) Q = W - z The potential (¢) includes a capillary potential (9) and a gravitational potential (-z). The capillary potential is equivalent to the other literature terms soil potential, suction, and tension. The potential (a) has been shown to be the free energy per weight of water of the soil water at a given depth 2 [4]. Appendix A illustrates the dependence of capillary potential on saturation, temperature, history, and composition. A practical problem of interest is the distribution of water in the soil during and following irrigation [5,6]. The water flow in this type of problem is called unsteady state. That is, the volumetric flux of water (V0) changes with time. To handle this type of problem, Gardner pr0posed the following model[7]. (1.5) where, (1.6) (1.7) in soils is a material balance Equation (1.5) states that the water (volume) per bulk volume 0) Q) r1. 0 CD1 | A “3172 82 Se E i 1.0 Gardner's equation for isothermal water movement on water in the soil. rate of accumulation of of soil is equal to the rate of gain of water (volume) per bulk volume of soil due to convective flow. The amount of water per bulk volume of soil is called the water content (5) and is defined in Equation (1.6) as the product of saturation (S) and porosity (e). the drying of a soil flow in soils during A phenomenon and unsteady state. phase by water vapor capillary movement. were by engineers. which would predict the drying rates of porous media. which is more difficult to model is or other porous media. The water drying is unsaturated, non-isothermal, Water movement can occur in the gas diffusion and in the liquid phase by The first attempts to handle the drying phenomenon Their main concern was to develOp models They did not concern themselves with models based on the detailed i mechanisms of water movement in porous media during drying. As a result, their models were a blend of theory and empiricism. The engineering drying literature has been reviewed in references 8 and 9. To describe the saturation profiles in‘a drying porous media, a diffusion equation was used with a constant diffusivity [10]. This approach did not fit the experimental data. In Appendix B, it is shown that Gardner's equation and Darcy's law can be combined to yield a diffusion equation with a variable diffusivity. A new model to describe the drying phenomenon was pr0posed by Philip and De Vries [11]. They assumed that the water vapor was in equilibrium with soil water. In this situation, the soil air is saturated with water vapor. The main point is that for the first time a model was proposed which mathematically described water movement occuring in two phases: gas and liquid. The model of Philip and De Vries is given below. A reader interested in a detailed derivation is referred to Reference 11. as _ . . - 3K (1.8) 5-1:- - V (DTVT) + V (Dave) + —3Z (1 9) c LT = V°(>\VT) - H mm v6) ' t vap 8 Equations (1.8) and (1.9) neglect the effect of soil water composition on the capillary potential and hence no composition variable appears in these equations. The energy balance (1.9) contains a conductivity (1) which includes the thermal distillation effect [11]. At a later date, Taylor and Cary used the thermo- dynamics of irreversible processes to develOp a model for unsaturated, nonisothermal, and unsteady state flow [12]. Their model also assumes vapor-liquid equilibrium and the equations are of the same form as the equations of Philip and De Vries. To solve practical problems using models for water movement in soils, the model equations must be solved. For unsteady state problems, the equations are nonlinear partial differential equations. Gardner's equation has been solved numerically for infiltration, redistribution, and some drying problems. A literature survey on numerical solutions to these unsteady state problems has been given in Reference 13. The drying of soils like many porous media consists of a constant drying rate and falling drying rate period. Covey studied the constant drying rate period using Gardner's equation. The model parameters were varied and saturation profiles were calculated [14]. Later, Klute gt_al. studied the falling rate period using Gardner's equation [15]. Neither of these studies compared the numerical results with experimental results. A study by Fritton et al. used Gardner's equation to simulate the drying of soil and compared computed results with experimental results [16]. Gardner's equation fits the cumulative evaporation versus time data but did not fit the saturation profiles. The experimental saturation profiles had an inflection point whereas the numerical results did not. The equations of Philip and De Vries have not previously been used to simulate unsteady state water movement in soils or other porous media. Their usage has been in calculating the water vapor, liquid, and energy fluxes from experimental saturation and temperature profiles at some instant of time. CHAPTER II THEORY This chapter will be concerned with the development of a general model for water movement in soils. Although develOped specifically for soils, it is general enough to apply to other porous media such as crystalline catalysts, wood, fibers, and paper. Before developing this theory, some important concepts and terminology will be discussed. The general model for water movement in soils will be a set of equations which describe the transport of fluids and energy through the soil. One fluid will be the liquid phase and the other fluid will be the gas phase. Both phases are fluid mixtures because the fluids contain more than one component. A theory of fluids is conveniently divided into equilibrium and nonequilibrium properties of fluids. The equilibrium properties are the thermal equation of state (P = P(T,Vl,...,Vn)] and caloric equation of state (U = U(T,Vl,...,Vn)). These equations relate the local pressure and internal energy of the fluid to the local temperature and volume occupied by the components of the fluid. The equations of state along with the equations 10 of change and apprOpriate boundary conditions describe the transport pehnomena of the fluid. Transport phenomena is concerned with the fluxes of mass, momentum, and energy which occur in fluids not at equilibrium. The equations of change are the equation of continuity, theequation of motion, and the equation of energy. In their most general form, they are written in terms of fluxes of mass, momentum, and energy. These equations have been derived for transport phenomena in fluids by Bird et_al. [17]. The equations of continuity and energy are mathe- matical statements of the conservation laws of science applied to a fluid: conservation of mass and conservation of energy. An early statement of the conservation of mass principle was given by the Roman poet Lucretius (ca. 96-55 BC), contemporary of Julius Caesar: "Things cannot be born from nothing, cannot when begotten be brought back to nothing" [18]. The conservation of mass principle was modified much later by Albert Einstein in his theory of relativity. For systems in which the velocity of mass approaches the speed of light, the conservation of mass principle is obeyed if relativistic mass is used. The principle of conservation of energy says that energy may be transformed from one kind to another, but it cannot be destroyed. This principle and the principle of conservation of mass are generaliza- tions of man's experience, so far not contradicted by observation of nature. 11 The equation of motion is a statement of Newton's second law of motiOn applied to a local fluid element. Newton's second law says the unbalanced force acting on a body is equal to the time rate of change of motion (or momentum) of the body. There are three levels of analysis which can be applied to develop the theory of transport phenomena in soils: molecular, microscopic, and macroscopic. The molecular level of analysis develops theories of transport based on the movement of molecules [19]. The movement of molecules is caused by intermolecular forces. On this level of analysis even a fluid is discontinuous as there are voids between molecules. This difficulty is overcome by using statistical distribution functions, and the equations of change derived by molecular considerations are partial differential equations with continuous functions [19]. The microscopic level views a fluid as a continuum and is not concerned with the individual movement of molecules. It is concerned with the microscopic prOperties of fluids such as local temperature, pressure, and velocity. Transport in soils is then described by applying the microsc0pic equations of change to the regions of the soil where fluids are present such as the macrOpores and micro- pores. The difficulty of this approach is the complexity of the boundary cdhditions between the phases present. 12 This difficulty is circumvented in the macroscopic analysis as the complex microscopic boundary conditions are incorporated into the macrosc0pic equations of change. Furthermore, the macroscopic approach is concerned with macroscopic properties of soils which are directly measure- able such as temperature and saturation. The general model for water movement in soils will be the macrosc0pic equations of change. The macrosc0pic equations of change for soils can be derived by two methods. The first method involves volume averaging the microsc0pic equations of change over a small macrosc0pic volume of soil. Bird et al. have used this method to develop the macrosc0pic equations of change for a general nondistributive flow system [20]. The second method involves definition of macroscopic quantities and derivation of the macroscopic equations of change in terms of these quantities. The following derivation of the macroscopic equations of change will utilize the second method since it is more simple and straightforward. The nomenclature is defined on pages ix-xii and Appendix C contains the three dimensional form of the macroscopic equations of change. 13 Derivation of the Macroscopic Equation of Continuity for Liquid Phase Water in the Soil A mass balance on liquid phase water in a differ- ential element of soil (see Figure 1) yields the macro- sc0pic equation of continuity for liquid water. Liquid water enters the differential element at position 2 with a volumetric flux V0 and leaves the element at position 2 + dz with a volumetric flux V0. Liquid water may evaporate or water vapor may condense in the element also. The mass rate of water evaporation per bulk volume of soil will be represented by the letter E. The rate of accumulation of liquid water mass in the differential element is equal to the rate of gain of liquid water mass by convective flow plus the rate of gain of liquid water mass by condensation of water vapor. That is, So 8Adz o o _ w (2.1) pwV A12 - pwV Alz+dz - EAdz — ——-——3t . where, ow mass density of liquid phase water 6 = liquid water content S = saturation (liquid water volume per volume of voids) and, 8 = 86 Since the cross sectional area is a constant, we can divide by Adz and then take the limit as dz approaches zero. Equation (2.1) becomes 14 / z ‘ z+dz volume of soil particles in the differential clement W“--- Vanna(fiflflnddIHWQrinAUmrdflflcnumidladammm volume of soil air in.thc differential element A = soil column cross sectional area. 6 i soil porosity (or void fraction) S '1nmunufion ' (1-5)“! ' SeAdz - (1-S)elds Figure l.--Differential element in a soil column. 15 (2.2) - Macroscopic Equation of Continuity for Liquid Phase Water The rate of evaporation (E) will be defined mathe- matically later in this chapter. Derivation of the Macroscopic Equation of—Continuity for Water Vapor in the Soil A molar balance on water vapor in a differential element of soil (Figure 1) results in the macroscopic equation of continuity for water vapor. Water vapor enters the differential element at z with a molar flux NW and leaves the element at z + dz with a molar flux NW. The flux NW is with respect to a fixed coordinate system and contains convective and diffusional flow contributions. Water vapor may also enter or leave the vapor state by liquid evaporation or vapor condensation. The molar rate of accumulation of water vapor in the differential element is equal to the molar rate of gain of water vapor by convective flow and diffusion plus the molar rate of gain of water vapor due to liquid water evaporation. That is, ~ ~ 3(C e(l-S)Adz) (2.3) NwA] - N A EAdz "‘ w z w lz+dz M _' at w Where, Mw = molecular weight of water 16 and (2.4) C = —— = ——— Dividing by Adz and taking the limit as dz approaches zero, Equation (2.3) becomes 3(Cw€(l-S)) 3t 8N w E _ W 82 MacroscoPic Equation of Continuity for Water Vapor In Equation (2.4), the molar concentration of water vapor is given by the ideal gas law. The partial pressure of water, the total gas pressure, and the mole fraction of water vapor present in the gas phase has been represented by the symbols, pw, p, and Xw respectively. Derivation of the Macroscopic Equation of Energy for the Soil By making an energy balance on the differential element of soil (see Figure 1) we obtain the macroscopic equation of energy for the soil column. Energy enters the differential element at z with a conductive energy flux q and leaves the element at z + dz with a conductive energy flux q. Sensible heat transferred by the fluxes of liquid water and water vapor also contribute to an energy flux. This flux has been assumed negligible compared to the conductive energy flux and will be justified by the t l7 simulation calculations later in this work. A cooling or heating effect is also present in the element due to evaporation or condensation of water. The rate of accumulation of enthalpy in the differ— ential element is equal to the rate of gain of conductive energy plus the rate of gain of enthalpy due to condensation of water vapor. That is, _ CBT Adz (2.6) quz quz+dz - AHvapEAdz — (_§E) where, C = volumetric heat capacity of the soil AHvap = enthalpy of vaporization of water Dividing by Adz and taking the limit as dz approaches zero, Equation (2.6) becomes .99. = E. (2.7) 32 AHvapE C at Macrosc0pic Equation of Energy for the Soil Thus far we have derived the macrosc0pic equations of change in one dimensional form. An implicit assumption in these derivations has been that fluxes, concentrations, and temperature are constant over the cross sectional column area (A). 18 The macroscopic equation of motion has been derived by Raats for a soil. He has shown that if inertia is negligible, the equation of motion yields Darcy's law [21]. Darcy's law can be used to describe the volumetric flux of liquid water in the soil (see Equations (1.3) and (1.4)). Darcy's law is written in terms of a potential driving force (¢). Appendix A indicates the dependence of capillary potential (W) on saturation, temperature, history, and composition. The expression for the flux of water vapor in soils is dependent on the number of components diffusing and the convective flux of the gas phase. In general, “' ~ de ~ 2... (2.8) NW = “ CDaW€(l-S)-E_ + XW 1 Ni where, (2.9) cv* = Z c.v. = Z N. l i 1 l 1 ~ — 2 ~ — P (2.10) C - i Ci — if and, V* = molar average velocity with respect to fixed coordinates Vi = average velocity of molecules i with respect to fixed coordinates D = diffusion coefficient of water in soil air aw 19 When water is the only component moving and it is moving by diffusion, Equation (2.8) reduces to ~ ~ €(l-S)de (2.11) Nw = - CDaw (l-Ew)dz The energy flux is written in terms of an effective conductivity. (2.12) q = - k —— Model Parameters Rate of Evaporation (E): Interphase Mass Transfer Evaporation and condensation of water in soils involves the transfer of water molecules across the gas- liquid interface present in the soil. This phenomenon is referred to as interphase mass transfer. The theory of interphase mass transfer is developed in a textbook by Treybal [22]. In summary, the rate of water mass transfer per unit area of gas-liquid interface is equal to the product of an over—all mass transfer coefficient (K0) and ~ * ~ a concentration driving force (Cw - Cw). The evaporation rate (E) can now be written as ~ ”-1: (2.13) E = Koa(Cw — cw)Mw Where , 20 ~* 2 4 ~* Pvap wa and a = gas-liquid interfacial area per bulk volume of soil (Adz). Pvap = water vapor pressure It should be noted that the water vapor pressure (Pvap) is dependent on saturation, temperature, and water phase composition. This mathematical dependence is indicated in Appendix D. When the liquid phase contains only trace amounts of components other than water, the main resistance to water mass transfer is in the gas phase. An exception to this statement would be if a trace component is a surface active agent which creates a small film of resistance at the interface. When the gas phase is the main resistance, (2.15) KO ; km where, km = gas phase film coefficient for mass transfer %— = gas phase resistance to mass transfer m For concentrated water solutions, the liquid phase resistance may become significant and must be included in calculating' the over all mass transfer coefficient (see Treybal Reference 22). 21 To allow mass transfer calculations using Equation (2.13), the mass transfer coefficient and interfacial area need to be quantified. The gas-liquid operations such as humidification, absorbtion, and stripping also require knowledge of the volumetric mass transfer coefficient (Koa). This coefficient is determined experimentally. Since no one has previously considered a general water movement in soils model of the form presented here, the volumetric mass transfer coefficient has not been measured. The model presented here could be used to determine the volumetric mass transfer coefficient from a drying experiment. In addition to the model physical parameters, the data required are the saturation (8), temperature (T), and the gas phase water mole fraction (2w). No one has measured all of these quantities together. As a result, this work will theoretically estimate the volumetric mass transfer coefficient. Soils (porous media) are packed beds of small particles, so earlier work on heat and mass transfer in packed beds will be useful for determining the film mass transfer coefficient (km). Since packed beds are composed of particles, some early investigations of mass transfer from single particles are pertinent. Fréssling studied evaporation from liquid drops and proposed the following dimensionless correlation [23]. \ ) 22 (2.16) Sh = 2.0 + 0.55 Reg/ZScl/3 where, k D (2.17) Sh = EE—E- aWi D V p (2.18) Re = —E—E— P u ' _ u (2.19) Sc — DD . aWi and, Sh = Sherwood number Rep = Particle Reynolds number So = Scmidt number km = gas phase film coefficient for mass transfer Dp = liquid droplet diameter Dawi = ordinary diffusion coefficient of component wi in air u = air viscosity p = air density Vg = air velocity Later, Ranz and Marshall also studied evaporation from liquid drops and proposed the following correlation [24]. 1/2 1/3 (2.20) Sh = 2.0 + 0.60 Rep Sc 23 It can be seen that Equations (2.16) and (2.20) predict Sherwood numbers of 2.0 when the air is stagnant. This number is a theoretical value for a sphere in an infinite stagnant medium. However, a recent mass transfer study using the collapsing bubble method verified the theoretical value of the Sherwood number (Sh = 2.0) for an oxygen bubble in stagnant water (Rep = 0.0) [25]. At low Reynolds numbers (Rep<10), most of the experimental data in packed beds are from heat transfer studies. Kunii and Suzuki predict values of Sherwood numbers much less than 2.0 at low Reynolds numbers. Their experimental data substantiates their model [26]. (J _ s (2.21) Nu -- m (RepPr) 0 S (2.22) Sh = m (RepSc) where, hD (2.23) Nu =TE C u (2.24) Pr = {— (2.25) 05 = 1.0 (shape factor) 5 = 0.4 (porosity or void fraction) C = 10.0 (ratio of average channeling length to particle diameter) >24 and, Nu = Nusselt number Pr = Prandtl number h = gas phase film coefficient for heat transfer k = gas phase thermal conductivity Cp = gas phase heat capacity Later, Littman gt_al. used frequency response techniques to study heat transfer from packed beds of small particles (porous media). They have claimed Kunii's method for calculating the film heat transfer coefficient from experimental data is incorrect. They have presented their own data and data of others at low Reynolds numbers to show that the Nusselt number asymptotes to a value of two [27]. The conclusions of Littman gt_al, will be used to calculate the film mass transfer coefficient (km). In order to determine the gas-liquid interfacial area per volume of soil (a), the model illustrated in Figure 2 was used. The soil is viewed as a packed bed of cylindrical rods arranged in simple cubic packing. This model predicts a porosity of 0.22 and a drainage saturation of 0.37. To calculate interfacial area per volume of soil (a) from the model, something must be said about the manner in which the water distributes itself at a given saturation. In this model, the water interface is assumed to have a constant radius of curvature. Also, for saturations up to 25 simple cubic packing of rods front View porosity drainage saturation Figure 2.--Interfacial area model. 26 the drainage point the interface is tangent to the rod at the point of intersection. When surface tension measure— ments are made with capillary tubes, it is also common to assume that the gas-liquid interface is tangent to the tube surface at the point of contact. The drainage point is reached during wetting when adjacent interfaces first touch one another. This occurs where the square diagonals intersect the rods (see front view, Figure 2). The saturation at the drainage point is calculated to be 0.37. Beyond the drainage point, it is assumed that drainage is slow enough so that the water will distribute itself as shown in the front View of Figure 2. The radius of curvature beyond drainage is taken to be the radius of curvature of a capillary tube which has the same capillary potential as experimental capillary potential data on a soil. The mathematical development and computer program for this model are given in Appendix E. Figure 3 contains the calculated relationship between interfacial area and saturation. At the irreducible saturation of the soil, the interfacial area must be zero. In Figure 3 the irreducible saturation is zero. i 27 1000. V Data from simulation of simple cubic rod packing model: Program Area 3, Run No. 2/1/72. 10. 03. 03. I 500. ‘_ Interfacial Area Per Volume (cm 0.5 1.0 Soil saturation (dimensionless) Figure 3.--Interfacial area per volume versus soil saturation. 28 Other models for interfacial area were considered. A model consisting of a simple cubic packing of spheres arrangement resulted in a porosity of 0.48 and a drainage saturation of 0.18. With a body centered packing of spheres arrangement, the porosity is 0.32. At a saturation of 0.12, the body centered packing of spheres was near drainage. Both of these models predict drainage saturations much lower than actually occur for sandy soils. For example, a sandy soil on the south campus swine waste disposal site had a drainage saturation of 0.35. For this reason and the computational difficulties involved with the sphere models, the simple cubic packing of rods model was chosen for this work. The over all mass transfer coefficient and inter- facial area are two physical parameters which have just been discussed. Other physical parameters in the general soil water model are hydraulic conductivity, capillary potential, water vapor diffusion coefficient, liquid water vapor pressure, liquid water enthalpy of vaporization, effective thermal conductivity, and volumetric heat capacity. Hydraulic Conductivity» Experimental data on hydraulic conductivity on Uplands sand is given in Figures 4-6. For high saturations, hydraulic conductivity is determined by steady flow experi- ments and Darcy's law. For lower saturations, hydraulic conductivity is determined from unsteady state flow 29 Data reference: W.J. Staple, Soil Sci. Proc., 33 (840) 1969. Uplands sand (78% 30-100 mesh) 0 Experimental data points . Least squares data points Hydraulic Conductivity (cm./day) 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Soil saturation (dim.) Figure 4.--Hydraulic conductivity versus soil saturation. 30 Data reference: W.J. Staple, Soil Sci. Proc., 33 (840) 1969. Uplands sand (78% 30-100 mesh) 0 Experimental data points . Least squares data points Hydraulic Conductivity (cm./day) 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Soil saturation (dimensionless) Figure 5.--Hydrau1ic conductivity versus soil saturation. 31 Data reference: W.J. Staple, Soil Sci. Proc., 33 (840) 1969. Uplands sand (78% 30-100 mesh) 0 Experimental data points . Least squares data points Hydraulic Conductivity (cm./day) 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1. Soil saturation (dim.) Figure 6.--Hydraulic conductivity versus soil saturation. 32 experiments and the equations of Gardner and Darcy (i.e., Equations (1.5) and (1.3)). The data contained in Figures 4-6 was curve fitted using a least squares technique so that the data could be used in computer calculations. Appendix F contains the documented subroutine for this data. Capillary Potential Figures 7-8 contain the capillary potential data on Uplands sand. At high saturations the capillary potential is determined by making measurements with a manometer. For lower saturations vapor pressure measurements are used to determine capillary potential (see Appendix A) [2] . Appendix F contains the documented subroutine which is a capillary potential curve fit modified to correct for temperature. Comparison of literature data on hydraulic conductivity and capillary potential demonstrates that these parameters are strongly dependent on particle size and particle size distribution. Figures 9-10 contain the capillary potential data for the Valentine sand used by Hanks et;al,[30]. The calculation of some of the data points is explained in Appendix L. Appendix F contains the documented subroutine which is the Valentine sand capillary potential curve fit modified to correct for temperature. 33 Data reference: W.J. Staple, Soil Sci. Proc., 33 (840) 1969. o Drying curve for Uplands sand (78% 30-100 mesh) x Least Square fit of the experimental points (0 ). -103 -102 Capillary Potential +w -101 -10 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Soil saturation (dim.) FiIJLIre 7.—-Capillary potential versus soil saturation. 34 Data reference: W.J. Staple, Soil Sci. Proc., 33 (840) 1969. (D Drying curve for uplands sand (78% 30—100 mesh) -- Experimental X Least squares fit of the experimental points ( G) ). -107 -106 Capillary Potential (CM.) [1): -10 -10 _ 0.2 0.4 . . 0.6 0.8 1.0 Soil saturation (dim.) Figure 8.--Capillary potential versus soil saturation. 35 Data reference: R.J. Hanks, et.a1., Soil Sci. Proc., 31 (594) 1967 C) Drying curve for Valentine sand (experimental values) £3 Drying curve for Valentine sand (calculated from saturation profile at the start of Hanks drying experiment-—see appendix L) ——— Least squares computer curve fit -104 -103 2' .9 H .3 u -102 C (D u 0 0.: >~ H (U H H '6.‘ l {3 -10 ll 9. + -100 0.2 0.4 V 0.6 0.8 1.0 Soil saturation (dimensionless) Figure 9.--Capillary potential versus soil saturation. 36 Data reference: R.J. Hanks, et.a1., Soil Sci. Proc., 31 (594) 1967 C) Drying curve for Valentine sand (experimental values) Least squares computer curve fit + w = Capillary Potential (cm.) 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Soil saturation (dimensionless) Figure 10.--Capillary potential versus soil saturation. 37 Water Vapor Diffusion Coefficient In this study the water vapor diffusion coefficient in soil has been assumed equal to the ordinary diffusion coefficient of water vapor in air. Philip and De Vries have suggested a value of two thirds of the ordinary diffusion coefficient [11]. Clearly the ratio of water vapor diffusion coefficient in soil to the ordinary diffusion coefficient will be a function of saturation and not constant. It has been shown that the assumption just made is an upper bound on the water vapor diffusion coefficient (Daw) in soil [28]. The ordinary diffusion coefficient for water vapor in air has been fitted as a function of temperature using an empirical equation from the International Critical Tables. T(°K) 1.75 (2.26) .5 (27 .15) aw IT(°K) = ”flaw '0 (0C) Liquid Water Vapor Pressure and Enthalpy of Varpofiiation Data on liquid water vapor pressure and enthalpy of vaporization was obtained from the Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. Vapor pressure and enthalpy of vaporization were curve fit as functions of temperature and vapor pressure was corrected for the effect of saturation described in Appendix D. The documented subroutines for these parameters are contained in Appendix F. 38 Thermal Parameters: Effective ThermaILConductivity and Vqumetric Heat Capacity The thermal parameters of effective thermal conductivity and heat capacity were obtained on Ottawa sand from Moench [29]. This data is presented in Figure 11, and Appendix F contains the documented subroutines which are curve fits of this data. The method of thermal con- ductivity measurement and volumetric heat capacity calcula- tion is contained in Moench's thesis [29]. In summary, the thermal probe method was used to measure the apparent thermal conductivity. The theory of Philip and De Vries was used to estimate the energy flux due to the distillation effect. The effective thermal conductivity is then obtained by subtracting the energy flux due to the distillation effect from the apparent thermal conductivity. General Model for Water Movement in Soils Under the Condition of Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium Thus far the general model for water movement in soils has been presented along with the physical parameters contained in the model. If vapor-liquid equilibrium exists, the general model reduces to the equations of Philip and De Vries. The equations of continuity for the liquid phase water (2.2) and water vapor (2.5) are added to give 3p 8 w _ _ §_ 0 ~ (2'27) '_§E—'- 32 (pwV + Nwa) 39 Effective Bulk Thermal Conductivity X 104 (cal./cm. sec. deg. C.)-ke Data reference: A.F. Moench, Ph.D. thesis, 69-12533, pp. 74—80, Univ. Microfilms, ' Inc., Ann Arbor, Mich. 70,-~ Thermal conductivity measurement ‘” by the cylindrical thermal probe method. 600 -_ .0- 50. *- + 40. “ 3‘ I 30. a" t 20. .1— “(- 10. 3: “ 1 l 1 : p 0.2 0.4 . 0.6 0.8 1.0 Figure ll.-—Effective thermal conductivity and volumetric Soil saturation (dimensionles heat capacity versus soil saturation. S) Volumetric Heat Capacity (cal./cm.3 deg. C.) 40 The energy balance (2.7) is modified to include the dis- tillation effect. (2.28) c—=-——-(—-"1AH M In the next chapter, the general model for water movement in soils will be tested. A drying problem will be described and the numerical solution of the general model and earlier models will be developed. Using the numerical methods, some drying problems will be run using the new general model developed in this work, the theory of Philip and De Vries, and the isothermal equation of Gardner. CHAPTER III NUMERICAL SIMULATION In this chapter, a general drying problem will be stated mathematically followed by the development of the numerical methods for simulation of the drying problem. The theory develOped in Chapter II, the theory of Philip and De Vries, and the isothermal water movement equation will be used to simulate some drying problems. In Chapter IV, a number of drying problems will be defined and the simulation results will be presented and discussed. Hanks eg_al. have published experimental data obtained from drying of Valentine sand by radiation [30]. The saturation and temperature profiles published are I averages of two replicate eXperiments. Attempts by this author to obtain their original data were unsuccessful because they no longer had this data. The complete set of boundary conditions for their drying experiments on Valentine sand were not published. In their experiments, ambient temperature was controlled at 2522 0C. but there was no control on humidity. Radiant energy was supplied by heat lamps and they attempted to minimize surface turbulence. / 41 42 The following general drying problem is for a sand column of the same type and dimensions as the columns used by Hanks gt_al. Figure 12 is a diagram of the sand column with boundary conditions illustrated. Table 1 contains the legend for Figure 12. In order to simulate a drying problem, the initial conditions and boundary conditions for the problem must be stated. The surface boundary conditions say that water can only be transported across the top surface of the column in the vapor state. Furthermore, the water flux is given by the product of a surface film mass transfer coefficient (km,s) and a concentration driving force. The driving force is the difference in water concentration between the atmosphere and soil surface. The film coefficient is a function of wind velocity and is calculated in Appendix K- The energy boundary condition contains a radiative flux (qr) and a convective flux (qc). The convective energy flux is given by a surface film heat transfer coefficient (hs) and a temperature driving force. The temperature driving force is the temperature difference between the atmosphere and soil surface. Again, the film coefficient is a function of wind velocity and is calculated in Appendix K. 43 Anuhuw,mxmdthnm _ Q1 1"” 2"" T“ 2 2T I . 1 § * \ R x qwm- UO(TA-T) L ‘ “—91 k .\ D k (I .5: ll -1 See Table l for the legend to Figure 12. Figure 12.—-Diagram of sand column for drying problems. 44 TABLE l.-—Legend for Figure 12. Materials L\\\\‘ UIUJIH [:1 E Column Dimensions Styrofoam insulation Plexiglass column wall Valentine sand Column bottom; composed of a layer of plexiglass and wood top column surface = convective flux of energy at the column walls (radial direction) tOp column surface LI = 45 cm. (Column length) Di = 10 cm. (Column inside diameter) Dw = 11 cm. (Outside diameter of column wall) D0 = 27 cm. (Outside diameter of column) Definitions of Variables qr = radiant flux of energy from heat lamps qC = convective flux of energy at the qwall Nw’c = molar flux of water vapor at the TA = ambient temperature ~w,A = ambient mole fraction of water vapor Initial Conditions (3.1) S(z,t) = 8(2) 2 e[O,L] (3.2) T(z,t) = T(z) ' ~ ~ t = 0 (3.3) Xw(z,t)= Xw(Z) Boundary7Conditions At the tOp column surface, (3.4) v°(o,t) = (3.5) Nw(O,t) = w,c = km,sP (Xw,A_Xw(O’t)) t Z 0 RT (3.6) q(O,t) = qr + qC = qr + hS(TA-T(O,t)) At the bottom column surface, (3.7) v°(L,t) = 0 ~ t 3 o (3.8) Nw(L,t) = o (3.9) q(Lot) = 0 45 The bottom boundary conditions say the column bottom is impervious to water flow and is a perfect insulator. Due to a lack of published information by Hanks gt_al., a column bottom heat transfer coefficient cannot be estimated. The validity of the perfect insulator assumption will have to be demonstrated by computer simulation. The general model for water movement in soils (Equations (2.2), (2.5), (2.7)) is the set of equations of change written in terms of fluxes of mass and energy. These fluxes of mass and energy can be written in terms of macrosc0pic prOperties of the soil (Equations (1.3), (2.11), (2.12), (2.13)). The equations of change will now be written in terms of the macrosc0pic properties of the soil. When the soil porosity and liquid water density are constant for the drying problems considered, Equations (2.2), (1.3, (1.4), (2.13) can be comined to give ~* ~ 0 Koa PMw (Xw Xw) (3'10) 3t — e 32 p eRT W 0 — _ fl _ When the gas phase pressure changes with time and position are negligible in comparison with other terms in the equation of continuity for the water vapor, Equations (2.5), (2.11), (2.13) combine to give 46 — ~* ~ (3 12) 29 = _ BEE.+ 52:,(XW-xw) ' 3t 32 eT _ Xw(l-S) (3.13) C = -—T__—_' _. D (l-S) 3x (3.14) N = — aw W w 32 T(l-Xw) The energy balance equation with a term to include radial losses through the soil column becomes (see Appendix J for calculation of U0) K a 4Do 3_T__9_<1_ _9_ .._9_ (3.15) C at — az AHvap RT PMw(Xw- Xw) D 2 (T- -TA )UO 1 __ AT. (2.12) q — ke 32 It can be seen that the three coupled partial differential equations are highly nonlinear. This fact precludes the use of successive linearization and implicit numerical techniques. Based on these considerations and the nature of the boundary conditions, it was decided to use the following explicit technique. A first order forward difference formula on time was used. Si.j+1' 1.1 (3.15) at 47 c. . - . . - 1.3+1 1.3 z 39 (3'17) 0t ‘ atl . 1,] T. . -T. . (3 18) lIJ+l 1!] 2'. El ' 6t 3t . 1,] On the spatial derivatives of the fluxes, a first order forward difference formula was used. A first order back- ward difference formula was then used on the spatial partial derivatives in the flux terms. O 0 v 0 I-V I I O _ 1+1 J 1!) 2 _ 3V (3.19) ( dz ) - FE—l. ll W1 j‘Wi-igj o _ I I _ g (3.20) Ki’j( 52 1) v Ii,j fi -fi - w. . w. . 8N (3.21) —( 1+1'3 l'3) ” - 53!). OZ 1!] x -x _ Daw‘l'si.1( ‘ W1,j wi-1.j’ ~ - (3.22) ( ~ dz ) Nwl Tl .(1-x ) l.j .3 W- - 1:3 q. .-q. . _ 1+l,j _1 j 3 _ fig (3.23) ( 52 ' ) — azl 48 T. .-T._1 . (3.24) ‘ke ( 1’3 1 '3) E ql- . 1,3' 62 1'3 If Equation (3.20) were substituted into Equation (3.19) and the hydraulic conductivity were constant, the following second order difference formula would result. 2 Q) *6 W. .-2W. .+W. . (3.25) K( 1+111. 2111 l'lIJ) = K 52 33 ilj The first order difference formulas on space were so chosen to obtain this type of a result. Equation (3.25) can be recognized as the second order difference formula for the second partial derivative of W with respect to z. The numerical approximation to Equations (2.12), (3.lO)-(3.15) is obtained by combining these equations with Equations (3.16)-(3.24). The resultant set of algebraic equations can then be solved on the digital computer. Appendix G contains the documented computer program which uses the above numerical techniques to solve the general model equations. If vapor-liquid equilibrium exists, the general water model reduces to the equations of Philip and De Vries ((2.27), (2.28)). These equations subject to the constraints of constant porosity, liquid water density, and gas phase ' pressure reduce to l 49 ~ - N M as _ _ l 3 o w w ”-2“ a)? ' E I)?” + pw’ ' N~ 4 D 8T _ _ Bq _ 3 w _ o _ (3°27) C "E - 82 (_32)AHvapr 7 Uo(T TA) i ~ where, gas phase pressure (P) appearing in Nw is treated as a constant. The initial conditions for the Philip and De Vries equations are: (3.28) §(z,t) §(z) (3.29) T(z,t) T(z). The boundary conditions are the same as those given by Equations (3.4)-(3.9). The explicit numerical techniques used for the general problem (Equations (3.16), (3.17)-(3.24)) were used to transform the equations of Philip and De Vries into a set of algebraic equations which could be solved on the digital computer. The computer program which solves the equations of Philip and De Vries is listed in Appendix H. The simplest water model for unsteady state flow in soils is the isothermal equation of Gardner. For a constant porosity Gardner's equation and Darcy's law combine to give 50 as 1 W0 (3.30) "E- " E- 32 -0 _ _ 3! - (3.31) V - K(82 1) These equations cannot predict the constant drying rate during the constant rate period, and so to run a simulation experimental data must be available to determine the constant rate. If the boundary conditions at the soil surface were known, the constant drying rate could be cal- culated from the controlling transfer process: that is heat transfer or mass transfer. The initial conditions for the drying problem using the isothermal equation are (3.28) §(z,t) = §(z) t = o The boundary conditions are (3.32) VG = constant, during the constant rate drying period. When the surface saturation reaches the irreducible satur— ation, the drying rate begins to decrease and the boundary condition becomes (3.33) S(O't) = SIrreducible Appendix I contains a listing of the documented computer program which solves the isothermal equation for a drying problem. CHAPTER IV RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Using the numerical method outlined in Chapter III, [ a number of drying problems were simulated. Table 2 con- _ 1 ‘5' ”4'“;- 1 ( tains a listing of the simulated drying problems. It can be seen from Table 2 that a number of simulations were run for each of the models: (1) isothermal Equation (3.30), (2) Philip and De Vries model (3.26, 3.27), and (3) general model (3.10, 3.12, 3.15). For simplicity, in the future the above models will be denoted as: (1) IE, (2) P&DVM, and (3) GM respectively. All of the simulations are for the soil column described in Figure 12 and Table l. A A numerical solution to any of these models brings up questions of stability and convergence. A numerical solution is stable if the difference between the real solution and numerical solution does not have large oscillations or grow large with time. A convergent solution is one where the difference between the real solution and numerical solution is very small. In this work the experimental drying data of Hanks gt_§1. gives an indication about the general shape of the solution. ‘This information is useful for a stability 51 52 case OHIO Amsmwv was» coflumasefim xmpm.Eo\.Hmo chmnnq u usmcfl cofiumflpwm .un\meHE v u hufloon> pcflz mUMwnsm . 3x :ofluomum mace ucmHnE¢ if Ho.on< .o0mm n .mEmu ucmflns< mcofluflpcou xumpcsom Awammumv pcmm mpcmama x Ho.o Amammumv pcmm mpcmHmD x H.o Awammumv Ucmm mpcmHmD mumo >ua>fiuospcoo oflasmup>m Amxcmmv pcmm mcfiucwam> Amammumv pcmm mpcmHmD mumo Hmflucmuom sumaaflamo pcmm m3muuo Acocmozv sump muflommmu ummn a wufl>fluospcoo HmEumnB Ammflu> mo q meaflcmv Esflunflaflsqm I HmEMm£u0choz Aumcpumov HmfiumnuomH mampoz wumum mpmwumca quESZ coHumasEHm .mEmHnoum coHustEHmln.m mammb 53 I o.m Noo.o o.m Noo.o Army umnEsz poo3umzm um; I I I I msoHUHpcoo HmHuHcH u now No.o 0mm o.m 0mm m.o 0mm o.m Amxmpv mEHu coflumaseflm x maa>um> weds x x x x ucmumcou mcofluapcoo humpcsom x x . x Amflmmumv pawn mocmHQD x H.o x x Awammumv pawn mpcmamb mump >uH>Huospcoo UHHsmup>m x x x Amxcmmv pawn mcwucmam> x x Amammumv pcmm mommHmD mump Hmflucmuom xumaaflmmu x x x x x pcmm m3muuo Azocmozv mump huflommmo ummn w >ua>fluospcoo Assumne x x x x Axm>ozv Edflunfiaflsqwcoz .HmEHoQuOmflcoz x Ammnn> wo a aflaflsmv Esflunflaflsqm .HmEHmzuOmficoz mampoz mumum xpmmumca Ha 0H m m h Hmnfidz coflumHDEHm .UmSCfluCOUII.N mqmdh 54 criterion. If a solution deviates largely from the general solution shape it can be judged unstable. The real solution will be the solution converged to by adjustment of the finite difference sizes used in the numerical solutions. In this work, the procedure used to arrive at stable, convergent solutions was the following. A space increment of 9 cm. was chosen and 5 space increments were used for the 45 cm. column. The time increment was then changed until a stable solution was obtained. Using the stable time increment as a base value, the time incre- ment was decreased until the solutions converged. By changing the time increments while holding the space increment fixed the ratio of time increment to space increment was changed. It was found that time increments differing by a couple orders of magnitude gave solutions which agreed out to 7-10 significant figures. For the long simulation runs, the larger time increments which gave convergent solutions were used to minimize computation cost. It was felt that 7-10 significant figure agreement was sufficient. The Michigan State University CDC-6500 computer was used to simulate the drying problems. A number of compiler options were available and the FTN compiler was chosen since it is guaranteed against system errors by CDC and has about 13 significant figures in single precision. In contrast the RUNT compiler which generates a poorer code matched only 9 significant figures of some sample FTN calculations and overlooked a fortran program syntax error. 55 A drying eXperiment was chosen to be an "acid test" for the different models. This is because water movement would occur in two phases and there would be temperature gradients to affect the water movement. The porous media chosen was a sand. A literature search did not turn up any references which contained the saturation and temperature profiles for a drying experiment and a complete set of physical prOperties data. However, the drying data on Valentine sand by Hanks et_§1. [30] did contain the saturation and temperature profiles and some capillary potential data. Since the data needed on Valentine sand could not be found in the litera- ture, data on other sands was found to supplement the information provided by Hanks gt_al. Hydraulic conductivity and capillary potential for Uplands sand was published by Staple [6]. Effective thermal conductivity and volumetric heat capacity was published by Moench for Ottawa sand [29]. With this data simulation numbers 1 and 2 were run. Table 2, 3, and 4 and Figures l3-15 contain the simulation parameters and results [33]. The unsteady state solution of the P&DVM has not previously been obtained. However, the constant and falling .rate drying periods have been studied numerically for the IE [14,15]. In the P&DVM it was found that the material lmalance on water determined the maximum allowable time increment. During simulation numbers 1 and 2 it was found 56 mmp\Eo 50 o. Eonuom cESHoo suns mumm mmmcflmun Houmooooma. mumm mqflHHmm manage qoflnmusumm mommusm Ho+mmamnv.l poflnmm mumm unapmcou mGsta mumm mcflhun oo+mooomom. mufimouom No+moooomv. summon cadaou “Spawn Hfiomv .80 on u n oo+mamowamm. 5N H N mH H N m H N o H N oo+mmnovmmm. oo+msmomamm. oo+mmmmsmos. oo+mmmm~mnm. mu< mcofluflwcoo HmwpflcH was «BWRI «cummmewommm. name on pawn mo oflumm m musmsmnosH wommm mo Hmnfisz Ho+mooooooom. A.sov ucmsmuonH mommm mo mNHm ~o+moooooom¢. A.aov numnmq cannon , vamHH mflCGEmHUGH mEflB H0 Hwflfiflz USE monmmmmmmmsm. mama. unmEmHocH made no muflm Ho+mooooooom. Amsmov mafia :oflumassflm aseflxmz :oflumEMOMQH Havaumfisz .H.uwnesc cowumasfiflm.u0m mnmumsmumm coflumaseflmII.m mqmda HOIMmmHhHHm. mo+mooooomm. oo+MHmovam. No+Mwm. m Helmmmahaam. mo+mooooomm. oo+anm¢Nmm. No+mhm. ¢ Helmmwdhaam. No+mooooomm. oo+M>momHmm. No+MmH. m Helmmmahaam. No+mooooomm. oo+Mmmmnmmh. Ho+mom. N HelmmmHhHHm. No+mOoooomN. oo+mmmmmmhw. o. H A.Ewov A.o.mmov A.Eflov A.EUV Homm> “mums mo cofiuumum 0H0: musumquEmB coflumuspmm cowuwmom ucmamuosH mcofluwpcou aneuHcH mnu mo mcfluwwq m ma mcfi3oaaom one ~o+moooooaam. A.omoummoum.so\.amov refine A.s.mmousmoI~eU\Hmov oo+mooooomvm. .mmoo Mommamne new: Had um>o Ham: mo+moooooosm. lama- so\Hmov xsas coflumflcmm HOImoooooooa. Homm> umumz mm coauomum maoz unmfinfid N0+M0ooooomm. A.U.mmov muzumummee ucmflnfid mcofluflpcoo Numpcsom mo umfiq a ma mcflzoaaom one 57 ~o+mooosmomm. A.x.mmoumaos.ew\sua.oov ucmumcoo moo ~o+mooooooma. umumz mo .uz amasomaoz Ho+moooooooa. A.Eudv whammmum mo+moooooomm. sawismn\dc .mmoo ummmcmua mum: Haa Hm>o mo+mooooooma. lmwv Hmusznfld .mwoo coflmsmmao mumcflouo oo+Mooooomom. m A.EHQV huflmouom No+MOOOooooH. A.EUV OH cfiaaoo N0+M000000om. A.EUV no :EsHoo Emumhm map MOM mumumamumm Havamwzm mo umflq m we mcflonHom one «OImmoemommm. mama on name we oflumm m mucmamuosH mommm mo umnfidz Ho+MOQOoooom. A.EUV ucmEmuocH mommm mo wuflm ~o+moooooomv. A.Eov sumcmq cEsHoo mmvmaa mucmEmuocH case no HmQESZ ch nonmNNNwavm. Amwmov ucmsmuocH mafia mo muflm Ho+mOoooooom. Amwmov mEflB GOquHDEHm ESEMxmz coflumEHOmcH HMUflumEdz .N Hones: GoflumasEHm MOM mumumamumm COfluMHSEHmII.v mqmde 58 .AN Ucm H mumnfis: cofiumasfiflmv HHom mo zummp msmum> GOOUmusumm HHomII.ma musmwmv A.Eov Hwom mo spawn. ov om ON 2 Ill) . j q _ .maowpflpcoo GOMHMHSEflm Mow O can m .m mmanma mum mama OH mafia I .m mama O mafia I .O m>0© N u mEflu I .m saw a u was» I .m a o coflufleaou HmHuHcH I . m6 (ssetuorsuemrp) uorqeanes IIOS .AN quESQ coflumasfiflmv HHOm mo abmmo msmuw> musummmmEmb HfiomII.vH.musmflm “.50. H30. 60 spawn 59 ov on OM OH I!“ q a a )4 mW ON Illllllmv om mm @ Ov .mcofluflocoo coaumaseflm How v cam m moanma mom mv mama OH I was“ I .O mmmp m u mafia I .m hop H u mEHu I .N. coflufipcoo HmauHcH I .H m>mDU (3°) eanexedme; 1:03 60 .AN Hogan: coflumasEHmv HHom wo champ msmuw> Homw> kumB HHOm wo COHHUMHM mHoE EsaunwaflvaII.mH muzmflm A.Eov Hflom mo spawn fl mcofluflocoo coaumasawm How v cam m mmHQmB mom mama OH maHH I .m mama O I 62H» I .m aoHuHucoo HMHuHcH I .H m>mso Ho. No. mo. vo. mo. bo. no. (ssetuorsuemrp) IOdPA 1839M ITOS go uorqoexg stow mnrxqrtrnba 61 that the time increment could be increased with time. For example the time increment used between 0 and 1 day was 1 sec. After 1 day a 30 sec. time increment was used. Simulation numbers 1 and 2 used the hydraulic conductivity and capillary potential (drying curve) for Uplands sand. From Figure 13 it is obvious that the simulation results do not fit the experimental drying data (Figure 16) on valentine sand. This gives an idea of how sensitive the hydraulic parameters are to the specific soil or porous media type. Uplands sand is a soil in which liquid water has a high capillary conductivity. This type of soil has a very slight S-shape saturation profile during drying because the liquid water movement is so rapid. The IE gives only the saturation profiles whereas the P&DVM gives the saturation, temperature, and equilibrium mole fraction of water vapor profiles. The saturation profiles calculated by both models were found to be the same and these results are contained in Figure 13. The equilibrium mole fraction of water vapor profile contains a peak (Figure 15). This is because the temperature is monotonically decreasing with depth and the saturation is monotonically increasing with depth. The result is that although the surface temperature is the largest and hence would yield the largest free water vapor pressure, the surface saturation is low enough to depress the vapor pressure far enough 7. 62 below the free water vapor pressure to give the profile peak (see Appendix D). Since the Uplands sand data did not fit the experimental drying data, the capillary potential function for Valentine sand was obtained. The capillary potential was measured by Hanks at low saturations and as discussed in Appendix L, the capillary potential could be calculated at the higher saturations from data published by Hanks et al. [30]. Simulation number 3 was run with the IE to illustrate the effect of the capillary potential function on the drying :saturation profiles. Tables 2 and 5 show that simulation rnxmber 3 contains slightly different initial conditions Also, the Valentine sand capillary than simulation 1 . Figure 16 potential function is used in simulation number 3. demonstrates that the Valentine capillary potential function results in a less water conductive soil and a more pronounced S-shape saturation profile. It also takes less real time in ssiJnulation number 3 to reach the irreducible saturation. Ever: vvith the Valentine sand capillary potential function, the simulation did not fit the experimental drying data on Valentine sand. Since the hydraulic conductivity of Uplands sand aPPEared to be too large, simulation numbers 4 and 6 were run I1 1 . I IIIIIIIIIII )1III‘ v1O$HO¢IO$HO:IH$IH*lmslm$IO$IHva¢lH$HH$~OnlmmlelmslsalvalasHO$OH$1mmi.nlv$lvswwnlv$lntlmnmss L.O$IO$IHnHH*HH$OO*IO$.Mei.n1»$ivn u .c n SOPPQI ZTEJDU DIIH mbmo oo+wooooooooomom. u >h~momoa EU No+moooooooooom¢. n Ibozwg 222400 *1“.*finm*.¥$*$#*$***$*$$$*#*#$$#*$*#¢$#¢**$*¢$333$¢$$$$$¢$¢¢¢$¢$$¢*$#$#fi##*$##*¢#*#¢#$$¢### .Eo mnN Rum w—IN muu ,ouN 3.58 flavgmmpwbpmm. 0053033. gmowzwmom. 0952.316. QUEER—km. Iamymzq OZOHHHOZOO HquHzH OI» m .$$sassas:$$$$$$$$*****saaaaanaatta*#¢$¢¢##¢######¢##a#¢¢#¢#¢¢##¢¢¢#t##¢##¢*¢$*¢######¢# golwtogoemhho NJmo Oh pJMO LO Omhdm m mhzmzumozm m0 coaumusumm HHomII.wH wusmflm A.Eov Hflom mo spawn ov om ON OH > . H H m -L «I- .mcoHUH©soo qoflumHsawm I How m can N moanms mom . cofiumHsEHm Hmusmaookl mump mcamup Hmucwsflnmmxm$v ow )1. I ( 1(4 1 (ssetuorsuamrp) uorqexnaes ITOS 65 to investigate decreasing the hydraulic conductivity by 0.1 and 0.01 respectively. Tables 2 and 5 contain the simulation parameters and Figures 17-19 contain the simulation results compared with the experimental data. Simulation number 4 fits the experimental drying saturation profiles the best and also fits the cumulative evaporation data the best. By decreasing the hydraulic conductivity of Staple, the over all drying rate is decreased and the S-shape of the saturation profile becomes more pronounced and skewed. The S-shape saturation profiles obtained during the drying simulations are very similar in shape to the drying saturation profiles for sands and clays that are presented by Larian [8]. The data presented by Larian is experimental data taken by engineers concerned with the drying phenomenon back in the 1930's. Unfortunately no capillary potential or hydraulic conductivity data was taken on these porous media. The Blake-Kozeny equation for saturated flow in porous media at low particle Reynolds numbers indicates that the saturated hydraulic conductivity is proportional to the effective particle diameter squared. This implies that by cutting the hydraulic conductivity by 0.1, the effective particle diameter of the porous media is cut by 1//I—1 Since sands range in particle sizes from 2.0 mm. through 0.10 mm. in diameter and Staple's saturated hydraulic conductivity of 188 cm/day corresponds to an 66 .Am Hones: cofluwaseflmv HHOm mo swamp mamum> GoHumuspwm HHomII.>H musmflm H.501 HHom Ho spawn ov om \ h p A] H H .mQOHqucoo GOHHMHSEHm How m paw m mmHnms mom :oflumHSEHm amusmfioo IX. mpmn mcflmuo Hmucmfiwuwmxm.r. msmu OOuu WKAMNU OHM“. om OH i I O (ssetuorsuamrp) uorqeanes ITOS 67 .Ao was .6 .m msofias: :oHHwHJEHmV QEHH momHo> zoflumuomm>m T mumuwemumm cofiumaseflm How m can m moanma 00m 9 .OZ fiflm v .02 cam m .oz cum coflumasfiflm Housmfioo mump mcfiwup Hmucmfiwummxm Ammmpv mEOB cm L — m>HHmHoESUII.mH musmfim ('mo) uorqexodEAg eAraeInmna 68 .Am tam w mumnasc coHpmHSEHmv HHom mo spawn msmum> :oHumusumm HHomII.mH musmwm H.501 HHom mo gamma OH Om ON [ F q _ p q A mGOHqucoo coaumasafim How O can m .~.menme mmm m .02 :smIOT 6 .oz cam cowflmasfiflm HmpsmEOUIXI sumo madman HmuamEHHmQxMITI msmO OOIH o m \ Ow. 0H fih (ssetuorsuemrp) uorqeanes ITOS 69 effective particle diameter of .62 mm. we have the following: By cutting Staple's hydraulic conductivity by 0.1, the effective particle diameter turns out to be 0.20 mm. which is still in the sand classification. Then, the hydraulic conductivity in simulation number 4 does correspond in magnitude to a sand. The data reported by Hanks et_al. on drying of Valentine sand [30] are an "average" of two replicate drying runs. The saturation measurements were by y-ray transmission. The work of Fritton et_al, indicates that the accuracy of the saturation profiles measured by this technique is not too good. There are differences between gravimetric and y-ray measurements which are probably due to slight inhomo- geneities in the soil column compared to the soil used to standardize the y-ray measurements [16]. Considering the scatter in the saturation profiles of Fritton et_al., Hanks §E_al. have probably published an eyeball curve fit of the actual data. Attempts by this author to obtain more experimental data on Valentine sand were unsuccessful [because the original data had been lost. With the accuracy of the y-ray measurements, simulation 4 is considered to be a good fit. 1 As in simulation numbers 1 and 2, it was found in‘ simulation numbers 3-6 that the time increment could be increased as the simulation proceeded. In simulation numbers 70 3, 4, and 6, a time increment of 6 secs. was used to 1 day and after 1 day a 60 sec. time increment was used. Using the capillary potential and hydraulic con- ductivity data which gave a good fit of the experimental data in simulation number 4, simulation number 5 was run to compare the IE and P&DVM. In addition to the hydraulic parameters required for the IE, the P&DVM requires the effective thermal conductivity and volumetric heat capacity data. The data on Ottawa sand by Moench [29] was used. It was assumed that this thermal data would not vary much from one sand type to another. Tables 2 and 6 contain the simulation parameters for simulation number 5. The size increment between 0 and 1 day was 6 sec. and the time increment after 1 day was 240 sec. The saturation, temperature, and equilibrium mole fraction of water vapor profiles from simulation number 5 can be found in Figures 19, 20, and 21 respectfully. After ' 5 days of drying there is good agreement between the IE and P&DVM. However, after 40 days of drying, there are some differences between the IE (No. 4) and P&DVM (No. 5) (refer to Figure 19). The irreducible saturation in simula- tion number 4 was set at S=0.015 which is the value reported by Hanks gt_al. for the drying of Valentine sand. The P&DVM calculates an irreducible saturation of S=0.00977 at 40 days of drying time. If the P&DVM is restrained to S=0.015, the \ ”TI 'L-Ih‘ H" 71 HOImOooooooothHm. mo+mooooooooooomm. oo+mooommwaawwamm. No+mOooooooooooom. m Holmomvammahmhaam. No+mooooooooooomm. oo+mommmommmoommm. mo+Mooooooooooo>N. w HOImOmOBBHHmNbHHm. No+mOoooooooooomN. oo+MoaomNmmHv>mom. mo+MooooooooooomH. m HoImommmNmoathHm. No+mooooooooooomm. oo+momooommmavmvm. Ho+moooooooooooom. N HOImOOOOmOOHmOHHm. mo+mOOOOOOOOOOOOm. OO+mOOmOOHHmOOHOO. .O H “musk.¥¥¥«¥¥%¥¥¥*%%¥¥«¥¥*¥¥¥*¥¥¥.¢¥¥ikfi¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥t£¥¥¥¥¥k¥¥¥fi¥¥um¥k¥¥%¥¥¥¥%¥¥¥¥¥%¥¥¥%«%¥%k¥%**¥¥¥¥ H.2Hov H.o.omov H.2Hov H.201 mom¢> mmemz mmoaammmzms onemmoao HH43 mo+mOOOOOOOO. HHHQIm**zo\H mmemz mo onOUHmm mHoz szmHmz¢ No+moooooomm. A.U.Um0v mmbfidmmmEMB BZmHm24 mZOHBHQZOU NMfiQZDOm ho BmHA.<.mH wZHBOAAOh HEB ¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥*ynumvm¥¥¥xn¥anyn¥an¥¥¥¥¥¥%*%%¥*%¥¥¥¥¥an¥anus¥¥¥anumyn¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥*¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥fi¥¥¥ mo+mOOOOOONO. H.o.omaImHoz.2w\ze¢I.oov Bz¢smzoo m¢o mo+mOOOOOOOH. mmsmz mo .93 mmHoomHoz Ho+mOOOOOOOH. H.zeo mo+mOOOOOOOH. Hw£Q mo pmHH m ma mcflzoaaom mgB 11'" 3’1]! ’1] I] I .Am Hogans :oHumHSEHmv HHom mo zumwo msmHo> musuwuwmawu HfiomII.0N ousmflm 723 How we 5me ov on ON 0.... IA 4 u 73 msmu ovnp .wcofluflpcoo GOHudeEHm Hem m can N menms mom coaumHSEHm kusmEoo.lrl dump mcfihuo HmucmEHmemeth mN om mm ov mv (3°) eznqexedmeq ITOS 74 .Hm Hogan: cofiumaseflmv Hflom Mo znmmp msmum> Hops? Hflom mo coflaomuw macs ESHHQHHODvMII.HN musmwh. H.501 HHom mo gamma ov om oN 0H A .r i + .1 O H .b . n .mcofluflpqoo soflpmasaam Ho n“ How m can N moanme mmm mu 1 GOH»MH:Ewm Hmu5m800.mYI L.No. m. 7w p O WWNQ on“. m.” > I) o In. mo. I S mfimc Mflu. v0...” u u. 1... V0. “.0 .au 80 H (T: O I mo. 3 ov o O O D .To - .T / M .n p. c 100. 1 m mhmv muu A - a. m>m© ovu u m 75 saturation profiles obtained are in good agreement with those obtained in simulation number 4 using the IE. And so the differences at 40 days in Figure 19 between the IE and P&DVM are due mainly to the differences in the irreducible saturation used in the IE and calculated in the P&DVM. Since the irreducible saturation appears in the surface evaporation rate Equation (3.5), there is the following explanation for why the P&DVM results in a lower irreducible saturation and greater overall drying rate. First, the ambient humidity used by Hanks et_al. is not known. If a higher humidity was used in simulation number 5, the higher irreducible saturation would have been calculated in the P&DVM. Second, if the capillary potential function for Valentine sand is on the low side at S=0.015, the irreducible saturation calculated would turn out to be lower than S=0.015. The temperature profiles calculated in simulation number 5 have shapes similar to the experimental temperature profiles. However, the calculated temperatures are larger than the experimental temperatures. For example, at a drying time of 40 days the surface temperature calculated is 5 deg.C. larger than the eXperimental value. The cal- culated values are larger because the zero heat flux boundary condition at the column bottom apparently was not met during the drying experiment. As mentioned earlier, the temperature profiles have very little influence on the calculated satura— tion profiles. This was demonstrated by comparison of the 76 calculated saturation profiles using the IE and P&DVM with identical irreducible saturations. Since the calculated temperature profile was similar in shape to the experimental temperature profile, the equilibrium mole fraction of water vapor profile in Figure 21 is expected to be correct in shape. As a result the water vapor flux by diffusion as calculated in the P&DVM should be correct. Figure 22 contains the surface evaporation rate as a function of time. It is interesting to note that the P&DVM predicts the sartup until the "constant rate" period is reached and then it predicts the falling rate period. Table 7 contains a tabulation of the material and energy fluxes during drying (simulation number 5). This data illustrates what is happening during the drying of porous media. During the first hour of drying, the evapora- tion-rate increases to the so called constant rate. During the constant rate period the liquid and vapor fluxes in the tOp 18 cm. of the column increase. The energy flux at the surface decreases due to convective losses to a lower temperature environment. The energy fluxes into the greater depths begin to increase. Between the third and fourth day, the falling rate period begins and the evaporation rate drOps rapidly during the next day, as shown in Figure 22. It can be seen from 77 A .Am HOQESC GOHumHnEflmv wEHu mDch> Nsaw Homm> OOMwusm II.NN Guzman Twhomv szHb ON OH H q I; .4. O V O (P '1'- m .mGOHqucoo coflumasfiam How 9 cam N menma mom coHumasfiflm HousmEouIbl rm.o ro.H Im.H - (1319M) xnI; IOdQA aoejlns (Kep-gmo/‘m6) 78 TABLE 7.--Material and energy fluxes during drying (simulation number 5). Tine days) Liquid Flux Profile Vapor Flux Profile Energy Flux Profile (gm/cmZ-day) (gm/cmZ-day) (cal/cmZ-day) 1/24 = 1 hour 0 -.l4129E+01 .85801E+03 2:0 cm. -.46369E+00 .63111E-04 .23667E+02 z=9 cm. -.25982E+00 .15354E-04 .101883+02 z=18cm. —.l39lSE+OO .18587E-05 .31995E+Ol 2=27cm. -.65285E-02 .93506E-07 .75314E+00 z=3ocm. l -.l4388E+Ol .85335E+03 2:0 cm —.88040E+OO .72146E-04 .118858+02 z=9 cm. -.3OOZlE+OO .18900E-04 .85283E+01 2=chm. —.l9946E+00 .66912E-05 .55225E+Ol 2:27cm. —.11651E+00 .58193E—06 .27264E+01 z=36cm. 2 -.l4409E+Ol .85289E+03 — 10207E+Ol .ll7OOE-O3 .lOl4OE+02 etc. —.42355£+00 .22522E—04 .70477E+Ol —.l9684E+00 .795253-05 .44487E+01 -.99388E-01 .18328E-05 .21548E+01 3 —.12793E+01 .82407E+O3 —.11182E+Ol -.l3005E-02 .45391E+02 -.70782E+00 .l779OE-03 .24730E+02 -.l8273E+00 .30663E—O4 .12806E+02 -.79696E-Ol .71885E-05 .53402E+Ol 4 0 -.4l64lE+00 .56079E+03 —.38723E+00 -.l6920E-Ol .23402E+03 -.3lll4E+00 .237lOE-02 .lS406E+O3 -.99323E-01 .386768-03 .99201E+02 -.348l9E-Ol .lOZlOE-O3 .47797E+02 3 0 - -.21450E+00 .46602E+O3 -.18575E+00 ‘.25756E-01 .25299E+03 -.l7023E+00 .34746E-02 .16180E+03 -.67437E-Ol .554688—03 .1039lE+03 -.18150E-Ol .l4136E—03 .50424E+02 4O -.36044E-01 .37104E+03 -.lO89ZE-02 -.34923E-Ol .24895E+03 -.35984E-Ol .49758E-02 .15033E+03 —.23704E-01 .l7778E-02 .93742E+02 ~.62395E-02 .22893E-03 .45435E+02 See Tables 2 and 6 for simulation conditions. 79 Table 7 that during this period the liquid flux in the tOp 18 cm. drOps rapidly. This is accompanied by a sharp decrease in the surface vapor flux. However, the vapor fluxes at the z=9 and 18 cm. levels begin to increase rapidly. The energy fluxes at depths of z=9 cm. or more begin to increase at a rate faster than before the start of the falling rate period. It should be noted that the difference in magnitude between the liquid and vapor fluxes is usually an order of magnitude or more throughout the simulation (Table 7). This coupled with the fact that the effect of temperatures on capillary potential is small explains why good agreement is obtained between the IE and P&DVM. The IE is a one phase model and the P&DVM demonstrates that it is the liquid flux which is controlling the drying process in simulation number 5. In Chapter II it was assumed that the convective flow energy fluxes were negligible in comparison to the conductive energy flux. The data in Table 7 was used in calculations contained in Appendix M to justify this assumption. The assumption was found valid. Simulation numbers 7-10 contain the results of simulations using the general model (GM) developed in Chapter II. These simulations were run to investigate the interphase vapor-liquid equilibrium assumption which is the basis for the P&DVM. As mentioned in Chapter II, there 80 is some disagreement in the literature about the value of the particle Sherwood number at very low particle Reynolds numbers. Since the interphase mass transfer coefficient is contained in the dimensionless particle Sherwood number and will have an affect on the calculated value of the gas phase mole fraction of water vapor, it was decided to investigate how sensitive the gas phase humidity (2w/2;) was to the particle Sherwood number. Simulations 7-10 used initial conditions for a dry soil. The drying simulation results from the P&DVM supplied the saturation and temperature profile initial conditions for the general model (GM). The GM initial condition for the gas phase mole fraction of water vapor was taken to be the equilibrium mole fraction of water vapor calculated by the P&DVM. Simulations 7-10 then show the unsteady state response of the gas phase mole fraction of water vapor from the initial conditions. A larger deviation from the interphase vapor-liquid equilibrium assumption would be found in a dry soil as opposed to a wet soil. Tables 2 and 8 contain the simulation parameters for simulation number 7. A particle Sherwood number of 0.002 was used as opposed to the generally accepted value of 2.0. A lower value of the particle Sherwood number would result in a lower gas phase humidity. Figure 23 shows the simulation number 7 results. It can be seen that the surface mole fraction of water vapor in the gas HOIMNOmemmmHmmHm. No+mmmmmmmnmmmmmm. oo+flmmommmmommomm. No+mooooooooooomm. Helmvmmooamvhvmvm. N0+M¢Hmwammmammvm. oo+mmmmHmHmFmHNNN. No+MOOooooooooonm. HOIMmmmowwNHONoow. No+MwbHOH©Nvammm. oo+MmmmNmmmmNmowH. No+mOoooooooooomH. Helmhmammwavmahmm. No+mmmmovhmmmmmov. HelmvmmwaHmBONmm. Ho+mOooooooooooom. HOImMmONommmvmoaa. No+m@omommwmmmmhv. Helmammmmvmhoamam. . H‘Vfllfiln o a««saa««x«aas««««x«««««*¥*««¥«*«««aaaa*«««««*¥*«***«***««ass«ak««««as««««s««««sa««a«««a««a« H.2Hov mom¢> mmaaz H.o.omov H.2Hov . H.20O mo onaoamm mHoz mmssmmmmzma onBHODBHO onaHmom azmzmmozH .¥¥¥¥¥**¥%¥ ¥*¥¥«¥¥ tkfl ** %*¥¥¥%¥ % ¥i ¥¥%«¥¥¥¥¥ ifit m OonaHozoo HHHeHzH mms mo oszmHH 4 OH wzHBOHHom may *¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥%¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥fi¥¥¥£¥¥*¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥i¥¥¥¥*¥¥%¥¥¥%¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥%¥¥%¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥*¥¥¥¥¥¥¥%¥¥¥*¥¥ moIMmOOOOONH. mHma os sHmo mo oHso HHHB mo+mOOOOOOOO. menIm««zo\H4ov stm onBHHaam HoImOOOOOOOH. H.2Hov mom<> mmaaz mo onBUHmm mHoz szmHmz< mo+mOOOOOOON. H.o.omov mmosMo mo+mOOOOOOOH. Hw¢o\mx.zov mmeHzImHm .mmoo onmommHo HmHZHnmo oo+mOOOOOOOm. H.2Ho. weHmomom mo+mOOOOOOOH. . H.2ov as zzDHoo mo+mOOOOOOOm. H.201 no zsoHoo mo+mOOOOOOOO. H.2ov meozmH ZSDHoo .Embm>m map How mummemumm Hmofimmgm mo umOH m ma mQOBOHHOM one 83 *>< mEHu msmum> Homm> Hmum3 HHom mo coHuomum mHoE ovumusmII.MN musmwm )1 .H5 Hones: coflumaseflmv A.mommv mafia O.H b « .msofluflpcoo noflumasfiflm How m can N moanwa 0mm Noo.o n Hogans ©003Hm£m maofluumm Homm> Houm3 mo :ofiuomum maoz x l Homm> Hmumz wo soflpomum QHOE Edflunwaflsqm 3x *2 coquHDEHm HousmEou ‘P b 1‘ owoaao.o IImvoaao.o Iromoaao.o Irmmoaao.o O ('mrp) IOdPA 1849M Iros go uorqoelg stow eoegxns 84 phase quickly approaches a pseudo steady state value close to 100% humidity. At lower column depths, the gas phase humidity is even closer to 100%. This means that even under dry soil conditions, the interphase vapor-liquid equilibrium assumption is valid. ‘Also, the dynamics of the gas phase mole fraction of water vapor are very fast. Simulation number 8 was run with the generally accepted value for the particle Sherwood number of 2.0. Tables 2 and 9 contain the simulation parameters and Table 10 contains the results. These results show that at all .column depths the gas phase humidity is very close to 100%. Also the gas phase equilibrium mole fraction dynamics are much faster than in simulation number 7. Evaporation is taking place near the surface and condensation is taking place near the column bottom. This is to be expected from the profiles in Figures 15 and 21. These figures indicate that water vapor diffuses away from the peak, toward the surface, and toward the column bottom. This type of result has not previously been obtained either by eXperiment or theory. Simulation numbers 9 and 10 are analagous to numbers 7 and 8 and were run to investigate what affect the soil hydraulic properties might have on the interphase vapor-. liquid equilibrium assumption. Tables 2, 11, and 12 contain the simulation parameters for simulation number 9 and 10. 85 HOImvammam. Helmmvhmmvm. HOIMMHomwom. HOIMvaHhmm. No+mhmmmmmm. oo+mmommomN. No+mwm. No+mmmammvm. oo+mmhmHNNN. No+th. No+mmmwvmmm. oo+mmmmmwoa. No+mma. No+mMmmwmov. Helmamhommm. Ho+mom. HNMQ‘U‘ HOImOOvaHH. mo+mOOOmOOO. HOImOOOHOHN. O. H.5Hoc H.o.mmov H.5Hoc 1.501 uomo> uouo3 mo coHuomum oaoz ousumuomfioa cofiumudumm :oHuHmom unoEoHocH mcoHUchou HmHuHcH on» no mcflumflq m ma OGO3OHHom one mo+mOOOOOHH~. H.mmaIsmoI~.so\.HmoO :sHHm 1.x.mmoIsmoImso\HmoO oo+mOOOOOOOO. .Omoo HmOmcmue ummm HH< Hm>o HHmz OO+mOOOOOOOO. AsmoImeomeoO stm :oHumHOmm HOImOOOOOOOH. Hoam> swam: Ho coHuomum mHoz HcmHnsa NO+mOOOOOOO~. H.o.mmoc musumummsms ucmHns< wcoHuHocou Numocsom mo umHH m ma mcHSOHHom one mo+mOOOOOO~O. H.s.mmoImHoz.so\5u<.ooO ucmumcoo mmo No+mOooooomH. uoumz mo unmfloz Hmasooaoz Ho+mOooooooa. H.Euo mo+mOOOOOOOH. ismm\meoc HmuszuHa .Omou consOOHo sumcHOuo oo+mooooomom. H.6HQV anamouom No+moooooooa. H.801 OH cEdHoo No+moooooomN. H.501 oo cEdHou Eoumwm onu new muouoEoumm HMUHmmnm mo umHH m ma mGHBOHHom one moImNmooomNH. NHoQ ou uHoQ mo ofluom Ho+mooooooom. H.601 ucoeouocH ooodm mo oNHm N0+MOgoooomv. H.501 camcoq cEsHOU melmvnoqanH. Hm>oov unoEouocH oEHB mo ouHm mOImmvavaN. Hmmmov oeHe coHumHsEHm EdEmez coOpoEHowcH HmoHHoEdz .m Hones: coHUMHsEHm HOw muouoEmumm coHumHQEHmII.m mqmde 86 TABLE lO.-—Simulation number 8 results. Mole Fraction of Soil Water Vapor vs. Time Particle Sherwood Number = 2.0 Time = 0.0 Secs. Mole Fraction of Equilibrium Mole Fraction POSltlon Soil Water Vapor of Soil Water Vapor 0. .llOS4655E-Ol .llOS4655E-Ol .900E+Ol .65715938E-Ol .65715938E-Ol .180E+02 .60620075E-01 .60620075E-Ol .270E+02 .54257406E-Ol .54257406E-01 .360E+02 .51391514E-01 .51391514E-01 Time = 0.002 Secs. 0. .11054643E-Ol .11054655E-01 .9OOE+01 .65715919E-01 .65715938E-01 .180E+02 .60620075E-01 .60620075E-01 .270E+02 .54257407E-Ol .54257406E-01 .360E+02 .51391515E-01 .51391514E-01 Time = 0.196 Secs. 0. .11054642E-01 .llOS4655E-Ol .900E+01 .65715916E-01 .65715935E-01 .180E+02 .60620075E-01 .60620075E-Ol .270E+02 .54257407E-01 .54257405E-Ol .360E+02 .51391515E-01 .51391514E-01 See Tables 2 and 9 for simulation conditions. HOIMvvhmmmeHNNvm. No+mmmmhmomaommmm. oo+mhmmwwmthNNom. No+mooooooooooomm. Helmmoomomamomamm. No+MmeHmemmmonN. oo+flahmnmmmmmhwmm. No+mOoooooooooonN. HOImOmmmommaovmhm. No+mmmmmwvammnmmm. oo+mmmvvvommmmvvm. No+moooooooooooma. Helmmmovmv>mmm0N¢. No+mmmmmammmmNHom. oo+MmmmmhawmmvaN. Ho+moooooooooooom. Helmwmmmmahmmmmam. No+mHmmmmthmvam. HOImOvamNmmHm>>H. . rimrnvin o ¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥*¥¥*¥¥¥*¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥%¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥%¥%¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥*¥¥*¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥*¥¥*¥¥¥¥¥¥¥ H.2Hov mom<> mmsos H.o.omov A.2Hov H.2ov mo oneoamm mHos mmssmmmmzms onBHmseam oneHmom szmzmmozH a«*«**«a*« *««*«*« ¥«« *3 ««««*** a «« ¥*«**«««« ««* mZOHBHQZOU fidHBHZH mmB ho wZHBqu m mH UZHBOAAOM mmB 87 ¥*¥¥%%¥¥%¥%¥¥**¥¥¥¥*¥%¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥*¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥**¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥**¥¥¥**fi¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥**¥*¥¥¥ OOImmOOOOONH. NHmo os sHmo mo oHsmm m mszmzmmozH monmm mo momsoz Ho+mOOOOOOOO. H.2ov szmzmmozH monm mo mNHm mo+mOOOOOOOO. H.201 meozmH zzDHoo OOOOOOOOO mszmzmmozH mzHa mo mmmzoz was OOImOOOOOOHH. Hmw0 AAdE mo+Moooooobm. Holfloooooooa. No+mOooooomN. 88 N0+M000hmomm. No+MQOoooomH. Ho+moooooooa. mo+moooooomm. mo+MoooooomH. oo+Mooooomom. No+moooooooa. No+moooooowN. No+mOooooomv. HwaoImezo\H¢ov stm one mmemz mo oneoamm mHoz ezmHmz¢ H.o.omoO mmDBHmmmzme ezmHmzm mZOHBHQZOU deaZDom m0 BmHA d mH UZHBOQHOM mmB **a*««a*«*«sax«a««««a««*a«*«««*«***¥***««aa«aax««««««aa«ae«a««3*«¥****««*««*«¥¥«a««aa H.m.omoImHoz.zo\ze¢I.oov azaemzoo méo asses mo .93 mHHaomHoz H.zeo Hwaa\m««2ov mme mmeaz H.o.omov H.2Hov H.201 mo oneommm mHoz mmaemmmmzme onemmoeam oneHmom azmzmmozH «fi¥¥*¥¥¥«* **¥*«¥* «13% a; *«iazcmfi an ”2.. ¥¥¥*¥¥¥¥¥ «fix. w. moneHozoo HaHeHzH mme mo ozHemHH H OH ozHZOHHom mme ««««¥*****¥«¥««ax«««ax«sx«ae«*¥****«*a*«««ass««x««a«r«a«a«aaaaa«a««*a*¥axa«*«xaaxxaxaaa«««* OHIHNOOOOONH. NHmo oe eHmo mo oHeam m mezmzmmUzH mudmm mo mmmzsz Ho+mOOOOOOOO. H.20O ezmzmmozH mommm mo mNHm mo+mOOOOOOOO. H.2ov meozmH zonoo omOOOOOOOOO mezm2mmozH mzHe so mmmsoz mme OOImOOOOOmHH. HOHHQV ezmzmmozH mzHe mo mNHm mo+mOOOOOOOH. Hmso HHHB HwaoINIIsoxHaoO stm oneéHomm mom4> omens mo onBUHmm mHoz ezmHm24 A.U.0mav mmbefimmmzme BZMHmEQ mZOHBHQZOU mm¢QZDom m0 BmHA 4 mH OZHSOAQOW mmB aaaaaaaaxaa«xx«aa«aa«««a«as«aaaa«*«*««Han««*««**%*«««¥a*««¥**««%*«««¥aaa««««««*¥«*«*« No+MOOOBmONm. No+mooooooma. Ho+mOooooooa. mo+Moooooomm. mo+mooooooma. oo+Mooooomom. No+MOOoooooa. No+mOooooomN. No+moooooomv. l I 1 I h A%£Q\N««SUV H.m.omoImHoz.zo\zOo mme<3ImH¢ .LMOU ZOHmDmmHQ wm¢ZHQmo H.2Hov weHmomom H.20O OH zonoo H.201 no zonoo H.2ov meuzmH zonoo .Eopmww onp How muopoEmuom Hmoemegm wo pmea m we mcHBOHHom one 91 The results of these simulations are contained in Fig- ures 24 and 25. Again, as in simulation numbers 7 and 8, the gas phase humidity is close to 100% and the interphase vapor-liquid assumtion is valid. The factor controlling the allowable time incre- ment in simulation numbers 7-10 is the mass transfer coefficient. For lower particle Sherwood numbers the interphase mass transfer coefficient is smaller, and a larger time increment can be used. Although it is not economical to run the GM for long periods of real time, it can be run for a few seconds to check out the inter- phase vapor-liquid equilibrium assumption. If the assumption is valid, then the P&DVM is valid and can be run for long periods of real time. If the assumption is not valid, the P&DVM is only an approximation and the GM shOuld be run. It may be possible to develop a numerical procedure for the GM which would be more economical than the existing numerical procedure. With the interphase equilibrium assumption validated, it was decided to use the P&DVM to simulate the response of the soil column to time varying boundary conditions. This type of simulation also has not been run previous to this work. The simulation parameters are listed in Table 13 and the time varying boundary conditions are given in Figures 26-29. Natural weather conditions existing in l.j.4- .Am HoQED: COepoHSEemv oEew msmpo> HOQo> HopoB Heom m0 SOHuoon oHOE ooowtrfizl. Houo3 mo soapomum oaoz Homo> Houo3 mo :oHuomuw oHOE Edemnflaesvm 3x k: coflwoasfiflm HouSQEoo ONNo.o (°mrp) IOdPA 1319M 1103 go uorqoexg stow eoegxns 93 .Hoa Hogans GoHuoHdEHmv oEHO msmuo> Homo> Houo3 Heom mo :onoon oHOE ooomHSmII.mN oHsmHm A.moomv oEHe No.0 Ho.o » oomHNo.o A u» 4mom-o.o 1' o.N fl Honfisc UOOBHocm oaoeuumm 0 )l D I! 0 1K 2 l .mconflocoo cofiuoHoEHm How NH Ocm N menme mom .oamHNo.o Homm> Houm3 mo cofluoouw oaoz X ' Homo> Hopo3 mo coHuoon oHOE ESHHQHHHSqm 3x *l coeuoaoeflm Housmaou (°mrp) IOdEA legem 1105 go uopqoexg stow eoegxns 94 TABLE 13.--Simulation parameters for simulation number 11. Numerical Information Size of Time Increment Column Length Size of Space Increment Number of Space Increments .69444444E-04 for 0-1 day real time .27777777E-02 for greater than 1 day .45000000E+02 .90000000E+Ol .50000000E+Ol The Following is a List of Physical Parameters for the System Column OD (Cm.) Column ID (Cm.) Porosity (dim.) .26000000E+02 .10000000E+02 .30500000E+00 Ordinary Diffusion Coef. Air—Water (cmZ/day) .19ooooooz+os Over All Mass Transfer Coef. Pressure (Atm.) Molecular Weight Gas Constant (CC. (l/day) .38000000E+06 .10000000E+01 of Water .18000000E+02 —Atm/Gm.Mole-Deg.K.) .82057000E+02 The Following is a Listing of the Initial Conditions Increment Position Saturation Temperature Mole Fraction of Water Vapor (Cm.) (dim.) (Deg.C.) (dim.) O .90E+01 .5715511E+00 .2500000E+02 .3117211E-01 2 .18E+02 .8424127E+00 .2500000E+02 .3ll7231E-Ol 3 .27E+02 .9057420E+00 .2500000E+02 .3117271E-Ol 4 .36E+02 .9916412E+00 .2500000E+02 .3117300E—Ol 95 .AoEHp msmHo> xoam soHuoHooH HoHomv Ha HoQED: coHuoHDEHm HOw mcoepeocoo muomcsomII.mN ousmflm Amuse wsHe oovN OONH /\ ‘(F‘ b 4 «(h- _ fi nr HHOHOOHE NH coo: NH .mun oowm .mu£ OONH IOOOH l uHm o>Hso Housmeoo.? HOOH .HH mean .mumc OmanHnsmco euemuo>flco oumum smmH:OOz ..Hm:m .Hmd .Hoooex .moum ”oocouomom oumo IIOOON (Asp-amo/Ieo) XHIJ uorgerpeu IPIOS 96 .AoEep msmno> ouopouomfiob ucoenEov HH HoQED: coHuoHDEHm How mcowgepcoo humwcsomll.eN ousmem Amuse osHe oovN OONH A i i i H I I x i I H I l om .om HHOHcOHa OH I .mun OOON coo: NH u .mnn OQNH I.oe Hem o>uso Housmaou.9 .Hema .HH oasn .smmezoez racemamq .ooe>uom moon Housoesoufl>cm .ddoz IIom .oouoseou mo .umoo .m.D mama amoemoHOmeHHu Hmooq "mooaouowom moon 4 ('3 'bep) exngexedmem quarqmv .AoEHu momuo> muflpwads o>eymHoH HcoHQEov HH Hogans coHuoHsEHm How mcoeuflocoo humpssomII.mN ouomflm $9: 95H. OOON OONH _ . H . I\ / 7 pamflcpefi NH u .mnz oowN 9 coon NH u .mus OONH 3-0m new o>Hso HouseeoulI .HemH .HH ocsb .qmmenowz .mcwmamn .ooe>nom moon Hopsoesonfl>cm .4402 .ooHoEEou mo usofiuummoo .m.D .mumn HmowmoHoumfieHU Hoooq “monouomom ouoo fooa / f 'M V x x oor = OPmIp) finrptmnH 9AI1PISH querqmv __.’L':. ’M V x .Aofiflu momuo> poomm ocfl3v HH Hones: :oHuoHoEOm How mnoeueocoo muopcsomII.mN.oH5mHm 3H5 95H. OOON OONH \ / n H 98 HHOHOOHE NH :00: NH .mufl oovN .mnn OONH new o>Hdo HousmEOUI? .HBOH .HH mash rammenowz .mnemamq ooH>Hom opmo Hmucoecone>cm .Hmoz .moumasoo Oo .ummo .m.p mung HMUHmOHoumEHHU Hmooq "ooconomom mumo ./ l 0H ma (Inoq 18d setrm) peeds purM 99 Lansing, Michigan on June 11, 1971 were used to construct a daily weather cycle which was repeated day after day for the duration of the simulation. The temperatures at the soil surface, 9 cm., and 18 cm. soil depths were plotted as functions of time in Figures 30-35. The saturation profiles are given in Figure 36. From Figures 30-36 it can be seen that between the second and third day the falling rate period begins and the surface saturation is near the irreducible satura- tion. The amplitude of the temperature oscillations increases with time at all depths. For example, before the falling rate period, the magnitude of the surface varia- tion is about 15 deg. C., whereas during the falling rate period the magnitude increases to about 30 deg.C. At lower depths the magnitude of the temperature variation decreases. Also, there is a lag between temperature peaks in comparison to the surface temperature peak. The temperature peak at the surface occurs at about 1300 hrs., whereas the temperature peak for z=9 cm. occurs at about 1330 hrs. At a depth of z=18 cm., the temperature peak occurs at about 1500 hrs. Simulation number 11 illustrates the moderating affect that soil water has on the soil temperature variations and magnitude of the soil temperature. During the nighttime 100 .AHH HoQEdG :oHumHoEHmv ouN .oEHu msmuo> ouopouomfioa HeomII.om ousmem oEee 996 w memo m meow N hop H OONH oovN OONH oovN OONH OOVN OONH AI + w w +1 1 000° 090° 0° 0 0 oo o o O o o o o o O O 0 O O 0 o I o o 0 O 0 o O O O o o o o o o O 0 o 00000 00000 .mGOOHHocoo coeuoHSEHm How ma paw N moanme oom QOHHOHDEHm Hopsmeoonu AV T 0H ma on mN om mm ('30) exngexedmeg Igos 101 .AHH Hones: coeumasfiflmv onN .oEHu msmuo> oHsuoHodfiou HHOmII.Hm ousmem memo e OONH oovN L e /% O mcoHuHosoo coHuoHDEHm How OH Ocm m mmHnOe mom coHumHoEHm Housmeooiu oEHe memo w memo m memo v coma oovN OONH oovN coma H F r OLD 5 MH (3°) exngezedmeg frog 102 memo v oomH \ h .AHH Hogans COHumHsEHmV .Eo mun..oEHu momHo> ouououomfiow HHomII.Nm onsmHm OOVN woo H oomH — oovN OONH 4+ .mcoHuHocoo coHumHoeHm H0O OH Ocm m mmHnOs mom coHpoHsEHm Hopsmeoonu msHs memo m memo N oovm oomH oovN oomH 1 i H II 000 o o 0000 o o o o o o o o o o o oo o o o O O o c O o 0000 o o o o 0- 4 0H mH oN (3°) singezedmeq Igos 103 .AHH Honssc :oHpoHsEHmv .Eo mun .oEHu momHo> oHsuoHoQEou HHOmII.mm opomHm oEHe meow e memo w want m mmoo v OONH OOVN oomH oovN OONH OOVN ooNH A H 1 H + + +1 mH 0 000 000 o oo 0 0 o oo o o 0 II ON 0 O o O O o O O O O O o o o o I ON 0 o o o o o O O O O O O o o o o 0: OO O O O O O O o o o 000 O O O a. O 00 . i.mm .mcoHuHUcoo :oHuMHDEHm How MH Ugo N moHQoe oom COHHMHoeHm HoHSQEOOHO I? ov /< (3°) eanexedMeq 1:03 104 .HHH Hones: :oHuoHDEHmv .Eo mHuN .oEHu m5muo> ousuouomeop HHomII.vm ousmHm mafia.» mxmo v mmmp m memo N Sop H OONH oovm OONH oovN OONH oovN OONH oovN OONH I I O v O O O I _ mH 000 one o o o o oo oo o o o o o o o oo o o o o o oo o o o o o o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 LION o o o 0o o o o o o o oo oo oo oo o 0 0 0 0000 000000 0 o oo o o O O 00 000 oooooooCmN ITom . mCOHanUGOU £0H#MHDEHm How OH Ocm m mmHnme mom GOHHMHDEHm Hopsmsounu .Imm .Iov < (3°) exnaexedmeq ITOS 105 .HHH HoQESQ QOHonDEHmV .EO wHHN .oEHu mSmHo> ousvouomaou HHomII.mm oHomHm OEHB memo e whom m memo m memo v ooNH oovN ooNH ooeN OONH oo¢N OONH \ .1 F p _ c H / 00 00 000 O 00 I... o o o O O O O O O O O O C o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o I O O 0 O 0 4 o o o o 0 0 0 00 0 o 0 0 00° 0 o o o 00000 0000 .mGOHuHosoo :oHpoHsEHm MOM MH can N moHnme oom coHuoHsEHm Housmeounu mH 0N mm on mm ov (3°) eanezedmeg Igos 106 .HHH Hogan: :oHuMHSEHmV HHom mo snoop mzmuo> coHumusumm HHomII.mm ousmHm A.Eov HHom mo umoo ov om ON 0H \4 u i H H O O . mmmo nun .msoHqunoo :oHuoHsEHm How mH poo N moHnoe oom IIm.o aoHumHsEHm HouomsooIOI ('mrp) uorqeanes IIOS 107 hours the soil temperature dropped below the ambient temperature when the soil surface saturation was high. This was because evaporation was taking place at night with the subsequent cooling of the surface. Although the bottom column boundary condition and radial column energy loss do not represent exactly the boundary conditions in an open field of soil, simulation number 11 does give a reasonable estimate of the tempera- ture variations. Cary has reported data on maximum daily variations in soil temperatures at various depths for Argonne, Illinois [32]. Table 14 shows these variations. If the soil is wet, these simulation results are close to those reported for Argonne daily maximums. TABLE l4.-—Maximum daily soil temperature changes over an annual cycle at Argonne, Ill. Maximum daily soil temperature Depth (cm.) variation (deg.C.) l 12 10 9 20 3 50 0.5 If the soil is very dry the simulation results are off by a factor of two on the large side. CHAPTER V CONCLUSIONS The objectives of this work, outlined in Chapter I, have been met. A general model to describe water movement in soils has been deve10ped. This new model and earlier models for water movement in soils have been used in digital computer simulations. The different models have been compared with one another and with experimental drying data. Using the general model developed in Chapter II, it was shown that even under dry soil conditions, the inter- phase vapor-liquid equilibrium assumption was valid. This assumption is the foundation for the Philip and De Vries model and has not previously been justified by soil air humidity measurements, or by theoretical analysis. The general model can indicate the validity of the assumption for a given situation defined by the following information: (1) saturation profile, (2) temperature profile, and (3) boundary conditions. The unsteady state solution of the Philip and De Vries equations has been obtained for both constant and 108 109 time varying boundary conditions. Previous to this work, the Philip and De Vries equations have not been solved for unsteady state problems. Simulations on identical drying problems using the Philip and De Vries model and the isothermal equation has shown the following. When the irreducible saturations (during the drying falling rate period) used in both models are the same, there is good agreement between the saturation profiles calculated by each model. An advantage of the Philip and De Vries model is that it can be used to calculate saturation, temperature, and equilibrium mole fraction of water vapor profiles during the drying of soil or porous media. With the hydraulic and thermal prOperties of the porous media, the irreducible saturation can be calculated for a given set of boundary conditions. The isothermal equation cannot predict the irreducible saturation. This is because the surface temperature is not known since this model does not predict temperature. Current use of the isothermal equation for drying has mainly been in fitting experimental cumulative evapora- tion data. Experimental information on the values of irreducible saturation is used in the simulations. Now for the first time the Philip and De Vries model has been solved in this work to yield a predictive model. 110 A time varying boundary condition problem was run with the Philip and De Vries model. Natural weather conditions were used as the surface boundary conditions. The temperature variations in the soil which were calculated were reasonably close to the experimental data. The simulations also showed that soil water acts to minimize the maximum soil temperature reached in a daily cycle. Also a dry soil has a daily temperature variation almost double that of a wet soil under the weather conditions studied. Literature physical property data was used with the isothermal equation and the Philip and De Vries model in an attempt to fit experimental drying data. The saturation profiles calculated fitted the experimental saturation. profiles. Although the calculated temperature profiles were similar in shape to the experimental temperature profiles, the calculated temperatures were larger than the experimental temperatures. This is because the column bottom boundary condition on energy flux was not a close enough approximation to the drying experiment boundary condition. The solution to the Philip and De Vries model developed in this work should be useful in problems involving drying of soils or porous media where a predictive capability is needed. The general model will also be useful in these. types of problems to evaluate the interphase vapor-liquid equilibrium assumption upon which the Philip and De Vries model is based. The following is a brief listing of some 111 problems where the Philip and De Vries model and the general model would be useful. (1) Drying of a porous media where a certain temperature or dryness must not be exceeded in the porous media. (2) Management strategies for irrigation practices. (3) Management strategies for insect pest control (example, cereal leaf beetle) where the insect hatching is strongly dependent on soil moisture and temperature. (4) Meteorological studies. For soils which are above the irreducible saturation, the isothermal equation for water movement would be the most expedient model to use if soil temperature information was not desired. In particular, the isothermal equation would be a good base for structuring models to describe the movement of chemical compounds in soils subjected to spray irrigation with liquid wastes. REFERENCES 112 10. 11. REFERENCES Darcy, H. "Les Fontainer Publiques de la ville de Dijon," Dalmont, Paris, (1856). Collins, R.E. Flow of Fluids Through Porous Materials. New York: Reinhold Publishing Corp., 1961, 47. Collis-George, N., Childs. E.C. "The Permeability of Porous Materials." Proc. Royal Soc. (London), Vol. 210A (1950), 392. Irmay, S. "A Model of Flow of Liquid-Gas Mixtures in Porous Media and Hysteresis of Capillary Potential." Paper 23c, 68th National Meeting of the AIChE, Houston, Texas, 1971. Philip, J.R. "The Theory of Infiltration: l. The Infiltration equation and Its Solution." Soil Sci., 83:345(1957). ' Staple, W.J. "Comparison of Computed and Measured Moisture Redistribution Following Infiltration." Soil Sci. Proc., 33:84o(l969). Gardner, W., Widtsoe, J.A. "The Movement of Soil Moisture." Soil Sci., 11:215(l921). Larian, M.G. FundamentalsJof Chemical Engineering Operations. EngleWood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice- Hall, Inc., 1958, Chapter 8. Treybal, R.E. Mass—Transfer Operations, 2nd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1968, Chapter 12. Ceaglske, N.H., Hougen, O.A. "Drying Granular Solids." Ind. & Eng. Chem., 29:805(1937). Philip, J.R., De Vries, D.A. "Moisture Movement in Porous Materials under Temperature Gradients." Trans. Amer. Geophysical Union, 38:222(l957). 113 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 114 Taylor, S.A., Cary, J.W. "Thermally Driven Liquid and Vapor Phase Transfer of Water and Energy in Soil." Soil Sci. Proc., 26:413(1962). Irrigation of Agricultural Lands, ed., Hagan, R. M., Haise, H.R., Edminster, T.W. Series of Agronomy No. 11. MadiSon, Wisconsin: Amer. Soc. of Agronomy, 1967, 200. Covey, W. "Mathematical Study of the First Stage of Drying of Moist Soil." Soil Sci. Proc., 27:130(1963). Klute, A., Whisler, F.D., Scott, E.J. "Numerical Solution to the Nonlinear Diffusion Equation for Water Flow in a Horizontal Soil Column of Finite Length." Soil Sci. Proc., 29:353(l965). Fritton, D.D., Kirkham, D., Shaw, R.H. "Soil Water Evaporation, Isothermal Diffusion, and Heat and Water Transfer." Soil Sci. Proc., 34:183(1970). Bird, R.B., Stewart, W.E., Lightfoot, E.N. Transport Phenomena. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1960, Chapters 3, 10, 18. Lucretius. "De Rerum Natura," Classics of Western Thoughts, ed. Nulle, S.H., Vol. 1. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc., 1964. Hirschfelder, J.O., Curtiss, C.F., Bird, R.B. Molecular Theory of Gases and Liquids. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1964. Bird, R.B. "The Equations of Change and the Macrosc0pic Mass, Momentum, and Energy Balances." Chem. Eng. Sci., 6:123(1957). Raats, P.A.C., Klute, A. "Transport in Soils: The Balance of Momentum." Soil Sci. Proc., 32:452(1968). Treybal. Mass-Transfer Operations, Chapter 5. Frossling, N. Ger. Beitr. Geophys., 52:170(l938). Ranz, W.E., Marshall, W.R. "Evaporation from DrOps: Part 1." Chem. Eng. Progr., 48(3):l4l(1952). 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 115 Wise, D.L., Wang, D.I.C., Matelles, R.I. "Increased 02 Mass Transfer Rates from Single Bubbles at Low Reynolds Numbers." Biotech. & Bioeng., 11:647(l969). Kunii, D., Suzuki, M. "Particle to Fluid Heat and Mass Transfer in Packed Beds of Fine Particles." Int. J. Heat & Mass Transfer, 10:845(l967). Littman, H., Barile, R. G., Pulsifier, A.H. "Gas— Particle Heat Transfer Coefficients in Packed Beds at Low Reynolds Numbers." Ind. & Eng. Chem. Fund., 7:554(1968). Schechter, R.S. The Variational Method in Engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1967, 213. Moench, A.F. "An Evaluation of Heat Transfer Coefficients in Moist Porous Media." Ph.D. Dissertation. University Microfilms Order No. 69-12533, (1969). Hanks, R.J., Gardner, H.R., Fairbourn, M.L. "Evaporation of Water from Soils as Influenced by Drying with Wind or Radiation." Soil Sci. Proc., 31:593(l967). Weber, H.C., Meissner, H.P. Thermodynamics fgr Chemical Engineers. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1959. Cary, J.W. "Soil Moisture Transport Due to Thermal Gradients: Practical Aspects." Soil Sci. Proc., 30:428(l966). Novak, L. T., Coulman, G. A. "A Simulation of Two Phase Water Movement in Soil." Proc. 1972 Summer Simulation Conf., San Diego, California, p. 940. APPENDIX A CAPILLARY POTENTIAL AS A FUNCTION OF SATURATION, TEMPERATURE, HISTORY, AND COMPOSITION 116 117 =0 = +w (called capillary potential) I l porous plate The free energy of water per weight of water in soil is a function of saturation, temperature, and composition. It can be calculated as follows: (A.l) d? = —)dS + (3T)dT (3 as T.¢i s ¢i ()dcbi ig—d’ISJ where, W = free energy per weight of water = dyne-cm/dyne Y°= standard state (S = 0, T,¢l,¢2,...,¢n) = 0 An analogy has been made between the soil drawing water as shown above, and a capillary tube drawing water. 9L. 118 The capillary tube analogy appears to be the source for calling W the capillary potential. When the capillary potential (V) is due to surface phenomenon such as curved gas-liquid interfaces in soil capillaries, the effect of temperature can be calculated from the surface tension (or free energy) as follows: (A.3) Integration of Equation (A.3) gives capillary potential as a function of temperature. This integration is contained in the physical property subroutine for capillary potential (see Appendix F). It was mentioned that capillary potential is also a function of history. This is because there is a hysteresis in the capillary potential—-saturation function which is dependent on the drying--wetting history of the soil. From the discussion in Appendix E on the interfacial area model, it is evident that the way in which the water distributes itself beyond the drainage point will affect the interfacial area--saturation function. The water distribution phenomenon likewise affects the capillary potential-~saturation function, and hence the hysteresis. For a drying process, there is no hysteresis as long as the soil saturation is monotonically decreasing. In this case a unique curve exists for the capillary potential--saturation function. APPENDIX B ANALOGY BETWEEN THE ISOTHERMAL EQUATION OF GARDNER AND THE UNSTEADY STATE DIFFUSION EQUATION 119 The isothermal equation of Gardner and Darcy's law can be combined to give an equation of a form similar to the unsteady state diffusion equation. Assuming capillary potential (V) is only a function of saturation, Darcy's law can be written Ull 0 av a§ a (13.1) v =-K(§§-§E—-1)=—D +K. O) N Substituting Equation (D.l) into Gardner's equation for constant porosity (e), 3?. __ (B.2) € 'a-E' - '3‘;(D 52‘) 5'; In the absence of gravity Equation (B.2) is analogous in form to the unsteady state diffusion equation written with a variable diffusivity. 120 APPENDIX C THREE DIMENSIONAL EQUATIONS OF CHANGE FOR POROUS MEDIA 121 The three dimensional equations of change can be obtained by making material and energy balances which include the directions. possibility for variation in three spatial The equations of continuity (Equations (2.2), (2.5), (2.7) in three dimensional form are: 3pw6 0 (Col) T = -V°pwV - E (C.2) at w M w (C.3) Cél=-V°q-VH E at vap where, .. a a 9.. (C.4) V — (5;, 5?: 32) In the above are vectors. equations the flux quantities (V0, NW, q) 122 APPENDIX D LIQUID WATER VAPOR PRESSURE AS A FUNCTION OF TEMPERATURE, SATURATION, AND COMPOSITION 123 The vapor pressure of water in soil is dependent on temperature, saturation, and water phase composition. Based on free energy considerations, it can be shown that the vapor pressure--temperature relationship should obey the Clapeyron equation [31]. d In Pva AHva (13.1) B = " T—E (1%) This equation can be intergrated to give (D 2) ln/PvaP(T2) = .. £52134; _ .1__) ° (P (T 7 R T T ' vap 2 l where, AHvap = constant over [T1,T2] This equation is not accurate over a wide range of temperatures because the enthalpy of vaporization is a function of temperature. For purposes of this study a quadratic relationship between ln PV and (%) was used 3P to obtain a good fit of vapor pressure over a range of Saturation is another variable which affects the vapor pressure of water in soils. If a wet soil is dried under isothermal conditions, the vapor pressure is reduced 124 125 as the soil dries out. This is due to capillary and adsorption forces. The adsorption forces predominate in very dry soil. The phenomenon can be quantified based on free energy considerations. Consider the following states for soil water. State 1 - pure water in soil at 25°C., saturation :8 =1.0 State 2 — pure water in soil at 25°C., saturation =S The change of free energy of soil water between states one and two is P (82) _ _ va (D.3) AG — RT ln F_—BT—_T" vap S1 The free energy change can also be written as (D.4) AG = VAP = V é’W) where, AP = -Y The combination of Equations (D.3) and (D.4) give the relationship between capillary potential (and saturation) and water vapor pressure. This equation is used to determine capillary potential under low moisture conditions in the soil by making water vapor pressure measurements. 126 Vpgw (0.5) P (82) = P RTY vap ap(sl) EXP( V ), wio When the water in soil is not pure, the soluble compounds affect the water vapor pressure. Methods for handling this situation will not be covered here as they are covered in standard thermodynamics textbooks [31]. APPENDIX E INTERFACIAL AREA MODEL (SIMPLE CUBIC PACKING OF RODS) AND COMPUTER PROGRAM 127 Figure 37 on the next page defines the terms in the following equations which are not defined in the nomenclature. The solid and void fractions are calculated as follows for the simple cubic packing of rods. 2 (E01) 1-8 =1TDL=1 4D§L 4 (B.2) e = 1 - % = 0.21460 Before drainage is reached: x* x* (E.3) Se = §%_ f (y*-§) dx = §§ f (y*-§) dx D L o D o x* * x* _ (3.4) a = 3%E-+ §%— f \/:+ (§§.)2 dx - §%—J 1 + (gfioz dx D L D L o D L 0. _ The equation of a rod cross section: (3.5) (x-R)2 + y2 = R2 The equation of the gas-liquid interface: 2 2 (E.6) x + (y-k)2 = r 128 129 simple cubic packing of rods y axis front vie Rod diameter = D = 2R Rod length = L r = radius of curvature of liquid-gas interface * y = y distance from x axis to the gas-liquid interface § = y distance from x axis to the rod surface Figure 37.--Interfacial area model (simple cubic packing of rods). so, (3.7) § (3.8) Y* +R 130 2 _ (x-R)2 - rZ-x2+k Before drainage the liquid interface is tangent to the solid interface at the gas—liquid-solid contact point (x=x*). so, (E.9) x* (E.10) r (E.ll) k R(1-cose) 2 1 R(-l + V1 + tan 6 ) 03034 R tane Combining Equations (E.3)-(E.8) and integrating we get (3.12) s (E.l3) a * g . [kx* _ 15[x*\/r2-X*2 + r2 sin ICES—)3 D e * —k [(x*-R)\/R2-(x*-R)2 + 32 sin—1(x ”R)J R +5 32 sin-l(-l) ] * % + ;% [r[sinfl(¥—)-sin-l(0)] -R[sin—l(x;-R)-sin_l(-l)J] 131 After drainage the following water distribution is assumed: Drainage occurs at 6 =45° or xl=x2=§:: 2 _w=P_.2_O_ r corresponds to exptl. capillary potential The equations for saturation and interfacial area after drainage are given below. x 8L 1*- 2 *_ (3.14) S = —§— f (y -y) dx + (y*-y) dx DL 0 I1 _8L .1 d*2 (E.15) a — —§— 7°‘dh + (a§—) dx D L where, (3.16) (y*-y) = k - \Irz-x2 - \[RZ-(x-R)2 (3.17) (fit-5;) = -(x-R) - fiZ-(x-R)2 (3.18) y = -(x-R) 132 Substitution of Equations (E.l6)-(E.18) into Equations (E.l4) and (E.lS) and integration give the following equations which apply after drainage. x (E.l9) S_= 2:3[kxl-%(Xfl/r2—xi + rzsin—l(fi))-%(x§—x§—2(x2-xl)R) x -R -%[(x2—Rh/2x2R-x§ + R2(sin_l( 2R )-sin_l(-l))]] x (3.20) a = E; [sin'1(—-l—)-sin‘l(0)] D r To find x1, consider the intersection of the line (y=-(x-R)) with the circle (x2+(y-k)2=r2). Then, (E.21) x1 = -%(k-R)iv;r2-k(k-R)2 , where r = 35(k—R)2 The location of the radius of the radius of curvature (r) on the y axis will be at y = k. The following conditions must be satisfied by this location. 1. The saturation calculated for a given k must be equal to the experimental saturation associated with the experimental capillary potential represented by the radius of curvature (r). 2. A solution must exist for a given k. That is the radius of curvature must intersect the rod or the line y = -(x-R). 133 The existence of a solution is also dependent on the rod radius. The following is the documented computer program which calculates the interfacial area versus saturation curve over the entire saturation range. Beyond drainage, logic statements are used to insure a solution exists and a Newton-Raphson interation is used to locate the radius of curvature at y = k. 134 FM NN OOHNM¢M~O Nmmmmmmm HNm¢m01~aoa~oamm~tm~o HHHHHHHHHNNNNNNN HNMQ’U‘ONQO‘Q .4 Mdmmd mmm\h_mOmOd IN~.\.oxu Im.oo¢~w. u «whwtdmo mac—hxmIm-. I~o\. am m4dd< mzomh mwéa: th oz< .>h~moacd .xmhmz<~o mam—hmqa 2— 04mm m¢¢44~dd «ma xmz we zoz o».4 m¢< m¢<44~d\m Owh<4304 «we wm Io-.\. oawoot szamm< m1» mwoz: tzm N m4mhmm zo_h~w Ium3u mo m3~omm zomb<¢Dha<44_d1444—d4u .w1340> mmd mdwx< m<44_ax\0~m4mx4 0» m¥0qu Umooa m¢4 mthxmhznu m0 m0~04m th mh440044u mo~m4mm4 ¢0~m4mm4 , .um.—m.0dd4u 4440 m0~m4wm4 N0~m4w¢4 .mmammmmd >m444~a4u I u 44~hzwpom >mwm .4. mo m4mm4 4mm4 44—04m10p2- 024 .m. 20~h4a0hu thINo.OI~.P4mem 00H 00 m4wm4 0 .00~.~o.wh~mz mm m4wm4 ..0.N.hmOm + o.~I.\..uva\hwomm¢~.0*0.N. u 0 ¢m m4wm4 .um.ONMoo.0dd4u 4440 mm m4mm4 Nw m4wm4oowh440044u mm 4mm4 44~u4umwhz_ wzp ZO—h4tdomzu mark Ib—J .wm044> Hm m4wm4 44hzwzmdmdxw mi: 024 20~4m3h11444—a40 10¢ mmDJ4> ow M4014 4000: th meZHmn w0200zoamwxxou 4 w>~o 44m; 20—h040m m—Ih .wz—a ow m4wm4 o0w0 m¢ th m0 xw0z—4>u mxh xwzh_m Ihux wu4umwhz_ 0—00—4 wzh 10 mm m4wm4 zonhuwmmmhzu th 10¢ ZOthz wz—hDDmmnw 2— ZD—PDJOm 4 0Z—m w>4344 hh m4wm4240 w: 024 .um.h0.x .mm.0 ohm. m «Du Zth aux u a h4xh 0m mmoo u m ow M4014 F4 .0. awhwz4~0 A4uua0z_4>u th wh443044u 30> um o20~h4m0h4m mh m4w¢4 mmoo #4 mxauuo w942—4N0 h4zh IUDw mmhwz<~0 44u~102~a>u wh440044u #5 m4w¢4 MF m4w¢4 2-.0.0~m .h4zaou mm UUUU UUUU UUU (JUL) UUUUUUUUUU 137 ¢¢Hm.x¢.m-.moa.Nx.~m.0.m.x0wru.Nmoox.moox .NoH.~o.m»_mz N¢Hm4mx<*********3*«****34##*********§§**«*******«*******nuua******************u ~¢~m4wm< .gx.>.Nx.~m.o.m.xumru.Nmoox.moox.zohxwz 444v o¢~m4w¢< o om~m4w¢< .ANxo I x.I u > w>m3u wzh 024 mum u m >N~m4mm< .m.0Nwm.oom~p4omz ma mmop<>xoo 10 m:_o.~o.wp_x3 ¢H~m4wm< ¢N oh 0o .o.o.mo.a.m_ m-m4ma< .m.onm._omN.~m u m m-m4mm4 .x*x I x»0.hm0m + .x*x I ¢3¢0ha0m n x 0N N-m.xN.m.m~m. n xI¢.xN.m.m~m. u 01¢. .xN o-m00m4wm4 .m_. u w00¥r~.XN.m.m~m. u xr¢.xN.w.m~m. u m:¢. .xN oofimqwmq 241p mmma m— m .20hzwz mzuhzoanow 20 mamxm mom x000:¢m.or00h.~o.wh_¢3 ¢o~m.Nx.0m.0.a.xumru.N000x.000x .mo~.~o.mhmmz Ho0m<0m4*******************#**u*******#**«*************************************0 oo~m4mm< .x.>.Nx.dm.0.¢.xumru.Nm0ox.w002.20»302 0040 om0m4mm< u wmqumm4 .¢\0*0u N**> + N**.N\0Ix. zofipuwwImmomu «4000m00 «woz_0>o mrp 024 o >m~m.~o.wh~¢3 m¢~m4wm4 NN 0h 0m .Mxomwox.u— 139 HONm4wm4 02w 00Nm4mm4 0020h200 00 oo~m4mm4 .c.¢~w.xm.o.¢~w.x-.o.¢0w.x-.¢.pm.xm.m.01. 100h4zmoc mm mo~m4wa4 200.0m.4.m.>.mm.fio.mhuaz woam4mm4 u cadm4mm4 .- 00 m=z_h200 024 whanmmx p00 ~z0ma u mo~m4wm4 o ¢o~m4mm4 ¢\.o.N\0. n 200 04 mo~m4mm4 ..o.o.z_m4 I .mxux020m4.*.0*0.\m«o.m u 4 o: No~m4mm4 ~¢ 0h 00 Hodm4wm4 ....HI.z_m4 I N oo~m4mm4..~ I 0\x*.N.z_m4.*.N\0 I .xxx020w4 *¢.«.0«00\.m + 0xpNomH¢~om u 4 om ow~m4mm4 mN.NN.—N .am I m.m~ ww~m4mm4 .m.m~wm.¢0a4u 0000010“. I~0h42201 «cu ~m~m4ma4 m.x.x .4og.~o.mh_xz om0m4ma4************»**§*************#****************************************no mm~m4mm4 ....o.~I.z~m4 m ¢w~m4wm4 I .ood I 0\x*.N.z_w4.§o¢\0*0 + .x*x I 0*x0hmomfi..N\0 I x..*moo I N mm~m4wm4..¢\x.zum4*a*m + .x#x I «*10h20mfix0fimoo I x»x.*.0*0.\0mmthohm u m Nm~m4wm4 20.0Nw¢.h0¢4u OmeDqu. I~0h4meu boa Hm~m4wm4 0.2.x.x gho~.~o.wh~¢3 140 F‘Nm¢MON®OOHNM¢LA~ON®®OHNM¢LD~O HH—‘HHHHHHNNNNNNNNNNMMMMMMM r-INm‘anONmO‘O H thwz thmz thwz thwz thwz thm2 thm2 thmz thwz thmz thwz thwz thwz thwz ZthZ thwz thmz thwz thwz thwz thwz thwz thwz thmz thmz thwz thwz thwz thmz 0002.2x.~ .om.~o.mh_az 04 0h 00 .0.0won00¥.m~ w I x u.zx 00\m u w u + — u — NA NA 0h 00 2.x*x I x*0.px0m m *.N.\.x*.N I 0.»..4x0 + x*m.o. + ..N**..~ I 0\x*.N. I .~.haom N \..N\0. I .x*x I x*0.hmom + 4\.m*m I xux. I 40*m.o u m0 wmmth.~mxo*0*0m I ...~I.z_m4 I 2.0 I 0\x*.N.z_m4.*.¢\0*0*m.o I N .mxx020m4*m*m*m.o I ..¢\0 + x*m.o.*.x*x I x*0.hmom + 4*x*m.o u Ax*x I «*mvhmOm u 4 ON . N0 0» 00 x I .4\.¢*m + x3x. I 4.3m.o u 10 mmmmwm.~m\0*0*~m I 2...~I.z_m4 I ..~ I 0\Nx*.N.z_m4.* m .¢\0*0 + .Nx*Nx I Nx*0.hmom*.oN\0 I Nx..*m.o I 0.x I Nx.*0 I xnx N I quNx.*m.o I .2mxx020m4*¢*x + 4*x.*m.o I .4+ .N\0 + xI.*x u m .xax I «*20hm0m u 4 0N 0N 0p 00 .~.p0.woox.u_ go 0.0 u x 00 0h 00 .mohaox.m~ o u 0 0.N\Nx u x .20000 #02 00 hmOw 20 wh2020004 m>~h4wwz h4Ih 100w x 200 wmmeQ 44—hmzH Z4 mx4z .Amm. 0004) 0w~mmuwdw th 0h .100100 100020 wmoau mm .m. 20~h420h4m m0 0004> Imz th amhzn mwaznhzou 20—h4mwhu zezwz********.¢\N**0 u Nfi§> + N**.N\0Ix. .am0z_0>u wrh 10 zo_»ommImmoxu thw2 thw2 thw2 thwz thwz szwz «40002—0 th mu w>200 wxb .N n 0002 200 o.N\0 I x0I u > m>100 th mm m>100 mi: .H n 0001 20m .mw>200 m00~m4> Ih—z mu4u¢mhz~ 0000—4 th m0 zothwmmwhzm wxh mwzutawhw0 20hzwz wz~h00200m Nb 243 am x4>02 ohoa .x.>.Nx.~m.0.2.¥UmIU.Nw00¥.w002.ZDthz wz~h00200m UUUUUUUUUUUU 141 00 mo 40 me No do 00 mm mm #m om mm 4m mm Nm #0 0m 04 m¢ #¢ 04 m4 44 m4 N4 H4 04 @m mm #m Z#3wz Z#zmz Z#xwz Z#xmz I~.\.w.m~m. 020 220#m¢ .\\\\.0.0Nm¢ Z#xwz . u mI¢.xm..0w#wJQIOU mmwz m20~#4wJIOm.OI~.#4meu Nm 2#sz Z#xwz Z#xwz . I~.\.m_. u w00¥z#.XN.m.m~w. m._.m001.>.x .Nmaac.w#_¢z gm 20.0Nwo u m1¢m x0x¢wIQ.XN.m.m~w. u x .mwzwz4 0# N Z#xwz 0mwmw>200 #02 m>4z 0Z4 mz0_#4aw#m om 0m#040200 w>4IIho.01H.#42101 Am Z#3wz Z#zmz Z#zmz Z#3mz Z#3wz Z#xwz Z#xwz Z#3mz Z#zwz Z#3wz Z#Zmz Z#xmz Z#zmz Z#xwz Z#zwz Z#3wz Z#zwz Z#zwz Z#zwz Z#3m20 w004> #ZmdeUINN.XoH.m~. u 20~#4mm#— m.w002.>ox .Hm.~ovw#_xz Ad 0# 00 ON 0# 00 .200I0.#0o>.u~ .m.#~mo.N#xwz 00000I-. IH.#4zm0m 10.0.x.>.~m.m .~o~.~o.w#umz .Am I m0m04 u > am + .0*0.\0mmw#N.#m*u u m HA 0# 00 ~N 0# 00 .20010o#0.>.m~ .mo#~wo.~#zmz 00000I-. I~.#4210¢ m0.m.x.>.am.m .00a.~c.m#023 .Hm I m0m04 u > am + .0fi0vxmmmw#Nohm*m u m MN 0# 00 .~.#oow0ox.m~ 0.0 u x 4N 0# 00 .¢.#0ox_mm 00 0# 00 .0mo#0o~.¢~ 2x u x .m_. u 000XI#.x0~.0~o0Nw. u 2x u .20#zwz .mDmon. I~.#42¢00 Ca god MN 000 4N 04 N 0m APPENDIX F COMPUTER PROGRAM SUBROUTINES CONTAINING PHYSICAL PROPERTY DATA 142 HNm¢m~OI~®OOHNm¢mONmOOHNm¢m~O .-I.-Iu-I.-I.—I.-Ia-dH—INNNNNNNNNNMMMMMMM dNMd’LfiOF‘DO‘O o-l >0040 02w >0040 210#wa >da40 wDZ_#200 OH >da40 2.x.0004*mmH~00.0 I o.~.\..x00004*0m-00.0 + 0.~.*.~.—m u .—.—m >0040 0#0.~#\..—. #*O~MNO~.0 I NON0.c#. u x >aa4u 0g 0# 00 .0.m.wa..0.mN I Am. #0mm4.u~ 0N >0040 .20.m*.~.m*.—.m*.—.m*.—0m*.~.m*0#m.~N¢ + .~.m*._.w*.~.wm >dd40 *.~0m*.~0m*~0.oom~ I 2~.m*.~0m*.~.m*—~.m*¢~.0~mN + .—.m*._.m*._.MN >0040*m¢.N¢#~ I .~.m*._.m*mN0.m0# + 2—0mfiNmo.c¢~ I ooo¢.o~.0xml u .00—m Na >da40 ON 0# 00 >0040 .200000.~ I A—vwvimmm#o¢.m#NI.0wa u A~0~m ¢~ >0040 0000.H u ._.m >0040 ¢~ 0# 00 2~0000.~.#0..~0m.m~ >da40 Na 0# 00 .000.0.#0.._0m.u_ Ma >0040 ON 0# 00 >0040 .~m#~m#m¢~.¢ + A~0miN¢mo~N~00moI00me u .—.—m >dd40 Mn 0# 00 .0000.0.w0..—0w00~ >da40 Na 0# 00 .0004.0.w0..—0m00_ ad >0d40 NH 0# 00 >dd40 .302 {410020 N >dd4uwI# 00#m 00001m >0040 2~I#m.xm.N~.0Nm. u 20_#420#4m1m~. I~.#42100 0m >da40 .~.m .0m.~o.w#~«3 >da40 Ad 0# 00 20.0.00..~0m.¢_ >0040 2.~ u — Cu 00 >dd40 >0040 o.~I~¢.0 waz#m0 .#00 .040 #00 0# 00m: m4: 0n# #4 wamuOMQ .024m >0040 wz~#2004> $0 02~>¢0 10¢ mm 4#40 44—#zw#00 >1400~040 wI# .0w##_m >da40 w>200 m4: #co~.m0m0~m..0020 .uum 400m .04.#w m224z 10 4#40 wI# >da40 .0.0w0 .00 0# .ON mm # Z0 m024m mI# .# mmD#4mmdzw# >00400Z4 m 20~#420#4m u0 w044> Zw>~0 4 20¢ aw#43 00 >dd40 >2400~040 wI# m210#mm 0Z4 mw#<400040 >0040 >0040 >0040 >0040 >0d40 .10 20 um 04_#20#00 .mm.#.m.20>dd40 mZ—#00200m >0040 mz_#00200w Nh >4: m0 24>02 .#.4 .00~.—m..00~.#..00~.w z0—m2wz—0 .mm.#.m.z.>da(0 wz~#00¢00m UUUUUUUUUU 143 144 HNm¢mmmo#mo~0—aa40 020 >0240 220#02 >aa40 002.#200 0. >aa40 ..x.0004*mm..00.0 I 0...\..x.0004*0m~.00.0 + 0...».000m u .000m >ca40 o#o..#\.... #uc.mNo..0 I NON0.o#. u x >aa40 0. 0# 00 .0.m.00..0.mN I .0. #0m04020 >aa40 .m**._. m*mmoo.om I N >aa40 N**.0. m§0N00.N# + .0. mum000.0m I 00m..0..ax0I u ._._m N. >aa40 0000.. u ...m >aa40 N. 0# 00 ..0000...#0....w00_ .. >aa40 N. 0# 00 >2240 .302 2420020 N >aa400r# 20#m 00001m >ca40 z.r#m.xm.N..0N0. u 20.#420#4wrm.. r..#41200 0m >aa40 ...m .0m..o.0#023 >ca40 .. 0# 00 .0.o.00.._.m00. >ca40 2.. u 0 0. 00 >2240 >aa40 ..rw02 00. I on #200202 w#. 024m >aa40 m024020 00 020>20 200 m. 4#40 04.#20#02 >24000240 02# .00##~0 >aa40 0>200 m4: ooo..0¢m.mm..0022 .000 0.0m .00¢4#m .0.) 00 4#40 0:# >2040 .0.000 .00 0# .0N mu # 20 00242 0I# .# 020#420220# >00400Z4 m 20.#420#4m 00 0004> 20>.0 4 200 20#43 00 .20 z— .m 04.#20#00 >dd40 >2400—040 0I# 0220#02 0Z4 m0#4000040 .uw.#.m.zv>0040 0z.#00200m >0040 >0240 >da40 >2040 02~#00200m N# 000 on 24>02 .#.0 >0240 .00~0.m..00~0#..00~.m 20.0202—0 >0040 .um.#.w.2.>da<0 0z_#00200m UUUUUUUUUU 145 HNMQ'mOI‘wO‘OHNMd'mOh HHHHHHHMMNNNNNNNN ANMQ'IAOI‘QO‘O .-I 22240 020 22240 220#02 22240 002.#200 0N 22240 ...0m*..umn...m*..0m*..0w*..0w«0#m..N¢ + ...m*...m*...mm 22240 *..0m*...m*.0.oom. I ...m*...m#...0&...m»¢..o.m~ + ...m*..0m*...mN 22240§m¢.N¢#. I ...m*.._a*0Nm.m0# + ...m*Nmo.o¢. I 0004.0..2x0I u ..0.m N. 22240 0N 0# 00 22240 ..00000.. I ..0m.*0mm#o¢.m#NI.2me u ....m 4. 22240 0000.. u ...m 22240 4. 0# 00 ..0000...#....0m.2. 22240 N. 0# 00 .0oo.0.#....0m02. m. 22240 ON 0# 00 22240 ..m#.m#m¢..¢ + ..0m*N¢mo.N.0om.I.2x0I u .0..m 22240 m. 0# 00 .0000.0.00....m.2. 22240 N. 0# 00 .000¢.0.0....0m02. .. 22240 N. 0# 00 22240 m.0.0 u :00 22240 .. 0# 00 .m.0.0.00....m02. 22240 2.. u . cm 00 22240 0Z4mIIIII0 22240 0z.#20.4> 00 0z.>20 202 m. 4#40 .4.#20#02 >2400.240 02# .00##.2IIIII0 22240 0>200 m4: #00..mom0.m..0022..0m ..0m...4.#0 m2242 20 4#40 0:#IIIII0 22240 .m 20.#420#4m 2o 00.4> 20>.0 4 202 20#43 20 .20 z. .m .4.#20#02IIIII0 22240 >24...240 0:# m220#02 024 m0#4.00040 ..m.m.z.22240 02.#002m0mIIIII0 22240 ******22240 mz.#002000****** N# >42 m0 x4>02 .#..IIIII0 22240 .0m ..m..0m .m 20.m202.0 22240 ..m.m.2022240 02.#00200m 146 HNm¢m~Oh®OOHNM¢m~OI~®©O HHHHHHHHHNNNNNNNNNNM "(NM‘TLDOI‘QO‘O o-i 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>I ..0*..N**... m*.m¢o.mN I ..0*..N.0N I 020 220#02 002.#200 NNmmhmom. u ..0200I 0000.. u ..0m 0. 0# 00 ..0000...#0..~.m.0. ON 0# 00 .002001 m..¢..¢. .00.0 I .00000. ON 0# 00 .0. muN.¢¢02x00u ..0200I 0.0.0 .0.¢.0 I .u0000. 200>101# 20#m 000010 200>I Z.I#m.xm.N..0N0. u 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>I 200): 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>I 4.0 0000002 0. 0.24#w 00 >#.>.#000200 0.00420>I ..Iw02 00. I 002402: 20 0z.>20 200 m. 4#40 >#.>.#000200 0.00420>I 0I# m>200 m4: moo..o¢m.mm..0022 .00m 4.0m 00.342o>x 0:. mz2zhm2 224 mmp4000440 200>I 0z.#00200m ..0 m*~¢¢m.o¢ + m40..#—I02x00u .302 2420022 N ON 0. 0. ¢. 0 0 0. 20.#420#4mIm.. I.0#4Z200 Om .000 0. 0# 00 .0.24#m .0m..000#.23 .0.0.00..~0m02. 2.. Nh 000 ON u . 0N 0m #200202 ah. x4>02 024m .00##.0 .0.3 20 4#40 0I# 20.#420#4m 00 0004> 20>.0 4 200 >40\.£0 2. >#.>.#000200 .200I.m.z0200>I 0Z.#002m:m C.F.I- .00.0200I..00~vm 20.0202.0 .200I.m.20200>I 0z—#002000 00 UUUQUUUUUUU 147 HNm¢m~or~000~Nm¢m~0I~00 HHHHHHo—OHHNNNNNNNNNN HNM~TLD~ON®OO .4 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>I 200): 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>IOI# 20#m 000010 200>I 200>I 200>I Z00>I 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>I 200>I rhafil$.&.. 0. .N*%... 0*.040.MN I .N.0N I 200>I Z.I#m.xm.N..0N0. n ..Iw02 0>200 043 000..0¢0.mm..0022 ..00 0.00 20.#420#<0 20 0004> 203.0 4 0..D420>I 0I# mz20#02 0Z4 m0#4000040 200>I 02.#00200m .00 m*~¢¢m.o¢ + m4m..#.I.2x0 020 220#02 002.#z00 NNmm>.00. u ..0200I 0000.. H .000 0# 00 ..0000...#0..—0m02. ON 0# 00 u ..0200I m..¢..¢. .00.0 I ..0002. ON 0# 00 ..0 mfiN.¢¢02X0 u ..0200I 0.0.0 .0.¢.0 I ...m.2. 0.0.0 .0.¢.0 I ..0002. .302 2420022 N ON 0. m. ¢. 0 0 0. 0. 20.#420#4WIM.. I.0#42202 00 ..0m .00..000#.23 0. 0# 00 .0.0.00..~0m.2. u . ON 00 2.. 00. I .0.24#m Nh 002 om om #200202 00. 0024.20 20 0z.>20 202 w. 4#40 >#.>.#000200 0..0420>I 0I# 24>02 024m .00##.2 .0.3 20 4#40 0I# 202 >40\.20 Z. >#.>.#000200 .200I.m.20200>I 0Z.#00200m CPO]- .00.0200I..00.0m 20.020200 .200I.w.z0200>1 02.#00200m UUUUUUUUU 148 HNMNTmOI‘mO‘Ov-INm‘anOI‘CD HHHHHHHHHNNNNNNNNN HNM¢m~OI~mOO .—I 2001# 2001# 2001# 2001# 2001# 2001# 2001# 2001# 2001# 2001# 2001# 2001# 2001# .N**.0N.0 I 2001#01# 20#0 0.0010 2001# 2001# 2001# 2001# 2001# 2001# 2001# 2001# 2001# 2001# 2001# 2001# 2001# 2001# 434##0 1002 .>.ZD .00I4h 20.#420#40 .42201# 01# .000. 020 220#02 002.#200 0o~.N.m + ..00*400.mmm u ..00200 0000.. u ...0 4. 0# 00 ..0000...#....00.2. o. 0# 00 I 00N.0*00N.00#200*00.Nm4 + 004.00N u ..00200 m..N..N. .mm..0 I ..0002. o. 0# 00 44omh + ..00*00.N40N u ..00200 ......0. .000.0 I ...0.2. .302 2420022 N 2001# 2.INm.xm.N..0N0. u 20.#420#401m.. 1..#42202 00 00I0N .22 4 .mmmN.I0o 20 0D.4> 20>.0 4 202 0220#02 024 00#4000.40 202 0. 4#40 01# .0.001# 012 2001# 02.#002000 ...0 .00..o.0#.23 h. 0# 00 .0.0.00...0002. 2.. u . o. 00 .0240 .#.2 0>2D0 043 020.2020.2 .102002 Nh 002 On x4>02 .2.< 2o «.42 2:. .o.>._>_pooozoouuunu .ozoo.m.z.zoo:. mz_.:o2m:m CPO-d .00.00200..00.00 20.0202.0 .0200.0.20200:# 0z.#002000 o. 4. m. N. .. 0. N. UUUUUUUUU 149 Hde’mOI‘moo—‘Nm Hu—OHHHHHHHNNNN -Nm4000000 H 240#1 020 240#1 220#02 240#1 002.#200 N. 240#1 ..00*00004m.0 + o0.000.0 u ..020 0. 240#1 0000.. u ..00 240#1 0. 0# 00 ..0000...#....0002. m. 240#1 0. 0# 00 240#1 .302 2420022 N 240#101# 20#0 0.0010 240#1 z.1>m.xm.N..0N0. u 20.#420#4010.. 1.0#42202 00 240#1 ...0 .00..000#.23 240#1 m. 0# 00 .0.0.00...0002. 240#1 2.. u . N. 00 240#1 240#1 .0240 240#1 434##0 1002 00I0N 4 202 0. 4#40 01# .#.2 0>200 043 02..2020.2 240#1 .>.20 .00I4h .22 .mmmm.l0o .0.001# 012 .102002 .2.4 20 4#40 01# 240#1 .0 20.#420#40 20 00.4) 20>.0 4 202 .0.000m**20\.40 z. 240#1>#.04240 #401 01# 0220#02 024 00#4000040 .20.0.20240#1 02.#002000 240#1 240#1 240#1 0z.#002000 Nb 002 om 24>02 .#.. 240#1 240#1 .00.020..00..0 20.0202.0 240#1 .20.0.20240#1 02.#002000 UUUUUUUUU 150 HNm4m00-00‘OHNM4In00000Hmm4m~0 I—Ia-Io-IHHHHH—INNNNNNNNNNMMMMMMM HNMQ'LAONCDO‘O v-I 3x00 3x00 3x00 3x00 3x00 3x00 3x00 3x00 3x00 3x00 3x00 3x00 3x00 3x00 3x00 3x00 3x00 00z.#200 ON ....0# + 0..MNN0\..0.0*40I0000#0m4..N02X0*...03x u ..003x ..0.#.0.2.>2240 .040 .20#43 02000 202 0z.#002200 202 I 20.#4000 0z.#z>02 01# .00I00.004N.N\......0# + m..mwN.\..0 N #00I0Nmo004.m I 00I0...0000.4.0.#2000 + .000400N.Nhl.2X0 u ..003x .. ON 0# 00 .0.m.0N. uN # .0 .#200 2. #2020024 0>.#400z .3x00 0Z.#002000 2.140.01..#42202 N0 ..0#...00 .N0..000#.23 .. 0# 00 .....0#+m..0#N0\..0*00I0N00004.m.#0.00I0...0000.4.002. m. 0000.. u ..00 m. 0# 00 ..0000...#0....002. N. m. 0# 00 .302 2420022 N 3x0001# 20#0 0.0010 3K00 Z.1#m.xm.N..0N0. u 20.#420#4010.. 1.0#42202 00 3x00 3x00 3x00 3x00 3x00 3x00 3x00 3x00 3x00 3x00 3x00 ..00 .00..0.0#.23 N. 0# 00 .0.0.00...0002. 2.. u . ON 00 .20.#4000 202>02400 00.2.002 01# .01 .22 00> 20 .2#4 . 0. 00412 040 01# 2. 02000022 .4#0# 01# .0.000 ONION 00242 01# 20>0 #.2 043 4#40 0.1# ..N**#\.00 + .#\.00 + 4 u .00h\2.z. 04 #.2 0>200 043 00Ih0 00042 ..00 1#04 .00.0>12 024 .2010 20 .2001 01# 2022 4#40 02000022 2024? .020#420220# 0Z4 20.#420#40 20 20.#0202 4 0. 3x0020.#0422 0002 20.20.0.000 01# .00412 040 01# z. 20#43 20 20.#0422 3x00 3x00 3x00 3x00 3x00 3x00 0002 10.20...000 01# 0220#02 024 00#4000040 3x00 0z.#002000 3x00 02.#002000 N0 002 cm 24>02 .#.. .00.0.0..00.003x..00.0#..00.00 20.0202.0 .03x.#.0.z.3x00 02.#002000 UUUUUUUUUUUUU 151 0m 20 3x00 3x00 020 220#02 152 HNfoLnOI‘mO‘OF-‘NMd'LnOI‘m HHv-Iv-Ir-II-OI-IHHNNNNNNNNN HNMd’LflOI‘mO‘O H 4024 4024 4024 4024 4024 4024 4024 4024 4024 4024 4024 4024 4024 4024 402401# 20#0 000010 4024 4024 4024 4024 4024 4024 4024 4024 4024 4024 4024 4024 4024 J F. lhfilgwlfiu *00+00000.0.. .000.. u 20.#420#40 020 220#02 002.#200 0. 03*... 0*40+0mNN00#.N + m**... 0 m N0+0000004.0 H 0. 0000.0 000.. M I 4#*... 0*00+00000N4.. + mufi... 0*40+00.mm00.0 I N**... 0*40+00#0000.m + ... 0*00+00000N0.0 I ...4 0# 00 ..04 ..00 #4 20#0 00.3 20.#42024>0 #41# 00 .20.#420#40 024 4024 04.04220#2. 2003#00 20.#4002 040.#02001# 02.>2.002 4 04 4024 N. 4024 Z.1#m.xm.N..0N0. n 4024 0z.#002000 0. 0# 00 .000...#0....0.2. 0# 00 N N. .. .302 2420022 N 20.#420#4010.. 1..#42202 00 ..00 .00..0.0#.23 .. 0# 00 2.. u .0.0.00....0.2. . 0. 00 .#.2 0>200 043 10.13 4#40 01# 00.02200 04024 2420022 2. 00002 01# 20 20.#4002.0 01# 043 00002 02.2042 002 0.000 0022.0 01# .0000 .20.#420#40 20 20.#0202 04.04220#z. 01# 0z20#02 024 00#4000040 4024 0z.#002000 N0 002 cm 24>02 CHOI— .00..4..00..0 20.0202.0 .4.0.z.4024 02.#002000 UUUUUUUU 153 -Nm4m HH—d—Iu—I HNm¢mON®OO ..4 2>000 2>000 2>000 2>000 2>000 2>000 2>000 2>000 2>000 2>000 2>000 2>000 2>000 2>000 2>000 020 220#02 00z.#200 N**..0#*000..m0000.0 I ...#*000h000.0 I >.0N.000 u ...>000 2.. u . 0. 00 .00IP0 00042 ..00 1#04 .00.0>12 024 .2010 20 .2001 01# 0. 002000 .0.000 0#I0N 20.#4N.2024> 4#40 01# 00242 20 .0000 0. # 00020) >000 20 #.2 0.#420400 4 01# 202 020#4202t0# 20 20.#0z02 4 04 20#43 20 #401 01# 0220#02 0Z4 00#4000040 2>000 0z.#002000 2>000 0z.#002000 N0 002 0N 24>02 .#.0 .00..>000..00..# 20.0202.0 .>000.#.2.2>000 02.#002000 0. 00000000 APPENDIX G COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR NUMERICAL SOLUTION TO THE GENERAL MODEL 154 ~Nm¢m~OI~mO~OHNm4m~OI~mO~OHNm4m0 H.4—4du...A.4—4NCUAHVBUNCVOJNCuflfimrfiU\mtn“) HCVfi14Ln1 02.#002000 ..0.#.0.Z.>2240 02.#002000 2420022 01# 202 0# >2400000z 024 00z.#002000 00#2020000 02.300002 01# .220000 040 4 2. 0240 20 02.>20 20.#4.042 01# 0. 00#4002.0 02.00 2000022 040#04 01# .4.002 000202 2. 20#43 20 #2020>02 00412 03# 202 00002 040.#4201#42 4 024 020.#4000 0>004 01# s. 3211.-.. .22.. .1. JV 0 hl'Xfiflfmlml_v}.QDclH \(0 P. \ffigx 10> L.\nm-.0.w. um v 'u :I” a. 31.0.3.4: A...» 3.0.2\.m....3§. .. 0M. u «.0... mil... 4.0.4.0le + MINI um. .113... .. . - A.HwIafikxzxn. nun—0| .xhnl. .. .. fin .00202022.0 0#.2.2 20 001#02 01# >0 2000022 040.#4201#42 02.300002 01# 00>000 2420022 0.1# Qt)LDULJLDULJLJULJL20LJLQULJLJULJLJUCJLQUQJLJU£JLJU 2000022 20.p00>200 000202IIIII0 020.p4000 024>0z 00>000 2420022IIIII0 «******.02.20 2420022*****«* N# 10242 0N 24>02 .#.0IIIII0 0 .#02#00u.0024#.#022.u00024#.#02#00.#022...02.20 2420022 155 156 N0 .0 Ch 00 00 he 00 mo ¢o me No .0 00 om 00 pm 00 mm ¢m mm N0 .m 00 o¢ 0¢ w¢ o¢ m4 ¢¢ m¢ N¢ .4 04 cm 00 pm 02.20 02.20 0. 0000 0. .2020.4.0 0402 020000 02. 02.200. 0000 0. 02.20 02.20 02.20 02.20 02 H do*%*********#******##*#***#*****#*******************#*******#*§********* 02.20 02.20 02.20 .20. 1.0200 220000 000IIII0 .20..422022. 0.1. .00 .2.22 .0N022..t 0004.24) 01. ..42202 44cm 01. Z. 20..422022. 04020) 2. 0402 0. 2000 0:. 0000420 .2020.4.0 0402 .02.2 02. 20..<22022. .022. .>000...2.2>000 02..002000 .0200.0.2.2001. 02..002000 02.20 ..0.000I>40n20\040. 0 02.20 4.002 000202 0:. 20 >..>..000z00 042202. 0>..00220 2.00200unnlt0 02.20 ..0.\22.00 I ..2...3x u 2x2 >0 000.>.0 20..42.200200 ..00slllu0 02.20 .20\.. 000422 0.00.0 024 040 2002.00 4024 04.04220.z. ..04nnulu0 02.20 0 02.20 IItIIIIIInInuIInIIIII lullaunlunuuulnnt 0 02.20 20...z.200 0004.24> 20.02200 0 02.20 0 02.20 lullanllnlllcnlluIllullalnuunnusnlauu 0 02.20 00004.24> 20.02200 20 020...z.200 0 02.20 0 02.20*********************************«***«**********************»**********0 02.20 0 02.20 .20.0 00.3 02.. 0 02.20 20 20..420.. 02. 10.13 .4 200202 20..420.. 02. 00.2.0020 20.02 0 02.20 .020..420.. 02.. 0 02.200>.2 >20>0 .00 00.2.22 00 00.3 000.2022 02. .0 u ~0002 2. .00224x0 0 02.20202 ..00 00.2.22 00 0. 024 000.2022 01. 20.20 302 00.2.0020 00002 0 02.20 .0 04 .0002 2. 0402 .N000 0. .000 0 02.20 20 0..42 0:. >2.0020 0. 002.000 0. .. 2. .020...0200 04...z. 0 02.20 024 .20..42202z. 040.20202 .020...0200 >2402000 .020.024242 0 02.20 040.0.22 0:. 2. 02.0402 202 0000 0.42202 01. >2.0020 0. 2000 0:. 0 02.20 000420 0. 0000 024 0.42202 0004.24> 0:. .¢..2 .m..2 .m..2 ....2 0 02.20 024 0.42202 0004.24> 0:. .20..42202z. .42202 0004.24> 0:. .022. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02.20 .20.0.2.240h1 02.#002000 157 .0>40. 02.. 20..4002.0 202.x42 .20. 04..Z0.02 >2400.240 .0.00 20. 4.002 000202 20 20..420.40 .2.0. N000\.000 u 0..42 .o2p000I0002I20\m*#20l2.4. .24.0200 340 040 .>40IN**20\040. x002 >02020 0>..4.042 .0.00 20. 4.002 000202 2. x002 >02020 0>..000200 .2.4. 00422 040 2. 02000022 .>40IN#*20\20. 00422 040 2. x002 20.43 2\2 >0 000.>.0 00422 040 2. x002 20.43 0.2020202. 00420 20 200202 .00002320\20. 20.43 20 .20.03 240000002 0.2020202. 02.. 20 200202 202.x42 02. .>40\20. 020.420220. 20 20..0z02 4 04 4.002 000202 02. 2. 000422 0.00.0 024 040 02. 200.00 .20.0.22000 2020242. 0042 004 20>0 .>40\20. .0 mm .4 4.002 000202 02. 2. 000422 0.00.0 024 040 02. 200.00 .20.0.22000 2020242. 0042 004 20>0 200202 .2020202. 02.. 02. 02..20002202 2000.2. 2000 00 200202 .2020202. 00420 02. 0Z..20002202 2000.2. 2000 00 .>40\20. >..>..000200 0.00420>2 .>40\20. 4.002 000202 024 02022002.4 02. 2003.00 004220.z. 02. .4 .20.0.22000 2020242. 0042 20.2 02.20.0.000I>40IN**20\040. 4.002 000202 024 02022002.4 02. 2003.00 004220.z. 0:. .4 .20.0.22000 2020242. .40: 20.2 ....3x I ..003x. 00202 02.>.20 20..42024>0 .2.0. 4.002 000202 20 >..00202 ..40\~**20. 020.420220. 20 20..0z02 4 04 2.4 2. 20.43 202 .20.0.22000 20.0022.0 >242.020 .>40\~**20. 02.20.200 0 .4 2.4 2. 20.43 202 .20.0.22000 20.0022.0 >24z.020 00.02.20 .0.02.20 00.02.20 00.02.20 40.02.20 00.02.20 N0.02.20 .0.02.20 00.02.20 00 02.20 00 02.20 .0 02.20 00 02.20 00 02.20 40 02.20 mo 02.20 No 02.20 .0 02.20 00 02.20 00 02.20 00 02.20 .0 02.20 00 02.20 00 40 02.20 00 02.20 N0 02.20 .0 02.20 00 02.20 0. 02.20 0. .. 02.20 0. 02.20 m. 02.20 4. 02.20 m. 02.20 .20. 20.024.0 220000 00.0.00 .20. 20.024.0 220000 00.02. .20. 0N.0 .2020202. 00420 .20\040. 20.43 20 20..4~.2024> 20 .402 .0>40. 0N.0 .2020202. 02.. .muuu-uu 2.0.0:---uu ..00unnuuu o..<2nuuuuu 2-----0 20-----0 ..02uuuanu aunuunu zzuuunnu ...oznuuunu zusuunu .zznnuauu zuuanau u /u 20>oxuuanuu u 0>oxuuuauu annu-uu .uuauuu ...zouznuuunu u 220.2-auuuu u 0:0.2uuuauu 02<>0uauunu m20u-nuuu u oaooaun-uu u 2oouuuunu oouuauuu .onuuuuu ~000uuuuuu ..0>0wosuuuau .0moununnu 158 44.02.20402 20..422022. .42202 0004.24) 02. 0. 02.300002 02.200.02...42202 000. 04.02.20 N4.02.20 .4.02.20 04.02.20 00.02.20 00.02.20 .m.02.20 00.02.20 00.02.20 40.02.20 mm.0z.20 mm.02.20 .m.02.20 0m.02.20 0N.02.20 0N.02.20 .N.02.20 0N.02.20 0N.02.20 4N.02.20 4..2.m..2.~..2....2 .000...0.0..23 .440N..42202 N00. 4..2.m..2.~..2....2 .Noo..o0.04w2 0 20..422022. .42202 0004.24> .2.22 024 2. 0402Illll0 . 0 .440N..42202 .00. 22..2 ..00...0.0..23 0N 22..2 ..00..00.0402 ... u 2.0 ON 00 0 20..422022. 0420200 .2.22 024 2. 0402IIII|0 0 004.0004.2X0..200 04220.X0 .0N.22..2..0N.4..2..0N.m..t..o~.m..2..0N....2 20.0202.0 .00 .20..om .03x..00.3x..00 .>..00 ....om ..0..00 .0..00 .0 N ..00 .02..om .2002..00 .>000..om .0200..om .0..00 .4 20.0202.0 3Z.02..32.20)02.0>02 0402 0 0 mm.0z.20*******************«***u*u*****************************§***************0 00.02.20*******************#*u**************************u***********«**********0 .0.02.20******************»****************u***********************************0 0N.02.20 0 o..02.20 .20. 0004.24> 00420 Nlllllu 0..02.20 .2.0. 4.002 000202 0 ...02.20 20 00422 040 02. 2. 20.43 20 20..0422 0002 20.20.0.000 ...03xlllll0 0..02.20. 4.002 000202 20 00422 040 02. 2. 20.43 20 20..0422 0002 ...3xlllll0 0..02.20 .2.0. 20.43 20 20..0422 0002 .20.024 43XIIIII0 4..02.20 .>40IN**20\20. 4.002 000202 2. x002 20.43 0.00.0 0200>lllll0 m..02.20.0.00 20. 4.002 000202 2. 20.43 0.00.0 20 x002 0.2.02000) ...>IIIII0 N..02.20 ..0.000t>40l~**20\040. 0 ...02.20 0043 220000 02. .4 .20.0.22000 2020242. .402 004 20>0 20>00I1III0 0..02.20 .0.00 20. 4.002 000202 20 020.420220. ....Illll0 00.02.20 .o0o000. 020.420220. .20.024 4.IIIII0 159 00.02.20 0. 05 00 .0.00..000¥.0. 05.02.20 50.2.2.0.542.N0002..000¥ .0.52.00.0402 05.02.20 .0.0542200 ..0. 55.02.20 00502 ...o..00.o<02 05.02.20 0 05.02.20 20.5422002. 040.20202 52.20 024 z. 0402IIIII0 ¢5.oz.20 0 05.02.20 .\.****0 05.02.20*******************#**************#***************************«***N .5.02.20**************************************************10~..01.0 542200 000. 05.02.20 .000...0.05.23 00.02.20 .0.0¢0...000!>40IN**.20\.040. 120.020N.01.\.0.5.0...0.000I0 00.02.20>40IN**20\040. .0000 20002425 540: 004 20>0 0043100.01.\.0.0¢0..>4¢ 50.02.200IN**20\0400 x000 20.54.042100.01.\.0.000...2.0. 2004> 20543 00 200 00.02.20.50420 0002 520.02410¢.01.\.0.0¢0...0.000. 02054200205 520.02410N.N 00.02.2001.\\.020.5.0200 52402000 00 50.0 4 0. 02.300000 0I5I0¢.OI.0542200 ¢00. ¢0.0z.20 120.0.20>00.20.43x.45 .#00...0005.23 00.02.20 120.0.20>00.20.43x.45 .N.52.00.0402 N0.02.20 0 .0.0z.20 020.5.0200 >240z000 52.20 024 2. 0402IIIII0 00.02.20 0 00.02.20 .000...0005.23 00.02.20 .\\\\\\.0.0N0...x.000l0002.20\i54l.00. 52450200 040150.01.\5 50.02.20.0.0¢0.20543 00 .53 240000002INN.01.\.0.5¢0...254. 0200002010..01.0 00.02.20\.0.5N0..>40\.0.0000 20002425 0042 004 20>0100.02.\.0.0.0..>40\N**0 00.02.2020. 20543!2.4 .0000 20.0000.0 >24z.02010¢.01.\.0.0.0.XNO...2.0. >5¢ ¢0.02.20.0020010..01.\.0.0.0.XNO...20. 0. 22000010..02.\.0.0.0.XNO...200 00 00.02.200 22000010..01.\.0.0.0.x0N...20. 050200 22000010..01.\\..2050>0 0IN N0.0z.205 200 0205024240 040.0>I0 00 50.0 4 0. 02.300000 0I5INO..I.0542200 000. .0.0z.20 2.532.0.0>0¥.200.000..0.00.00 .000...0.05.23 00.02.20 2.532.0.0>02.200.000..0.00.00 ...52.0000402 0¢.02.20 0 0¢.02.20 2050>0 200 0205024240 040.0520 52.20 024 2. 0402IIIII0 5¢.0z.20 0 0¢.02.20 .040N. u ¢.5215.01.\ 0 0¢.02.20 .¢40N. u 0.5225.01.\.¢40N. u N.5225.0I.\.¢40N. u ..5215.01.\.0~ 160 0.N02.20 0.N02.20 ¢.NOZ.20 0.N02.20 N.N02.20 ..N0z.20 0.N02.20 00N02.20 00N02.20 5o~oz_mo ...z_o.xo.x¢....zu.zm.xm~. .0..0N00.x¢.0..0~0.x0.0..0542200 000. .0..3x..0..5..0..0.N.0. .ooo0.0¢.w.0mz om ~*~0mo u N 0 u o_ u N ..0.05 + 0..05N.\..0..0 I 0000...*.0..3x u .0.00 ...t.0.I0.x0.. I.\.2004> 20543 00 20.50420 000210N.x0¢ 2.. u 0. 0m 00 .000...0.05.23 ..0.000.I0.x..0 00N02.20.02054200205I...xo..20.542054020..xm..20.5.000I0.x...5202020Z.I0.00 momoz.201.\\.********** **»**** *§* ** ******* u ** ********* ***I~m. I.\.~ ¢0N02.20020.5.0200 04.5.2. 0:5 00 02.50.0 4 0. 00N02.20 NON02.20 .0N0z.20 00N02.20 00.02.20 00.02.20 50.02.20 .2..u.....zx...z..u....05...z..u....000 020.5.0200 04.5.2. 500 52.20 024 z. 02.300000 0I5INO..I.0542200 000. .000...0.05.23 .¢.52.0000402 .000...0.05.23 .0.0N0.N000 05 5000 00 0.5420.N.01.\.¢N..052020202. 004000 00.02.20 00 20020ZION.01.\.0..N0...20. 52020202. 00400 00 0N.0ION.OI.\.0..¢ 00.02.2000...20. 250200 22000020..01.\..N..052020202. 02.5 00 200202 015100 ¢0.02.20N.01.\.0..N0..0>40. 52020202. 02.5 00 0N.0ION.02.\.0.0N0..0540. 020 00.02.20.5 20.54002.0 202.X42100.01.\\.20.5422002. 040.2020ZI.N..I..542200 500. N0.02.20 .0.0z.20 00.02.20 00.02.20 00.02.20 50.02.20 00.02.20 00.02.20 ¢0.0Z.20 00.02.20 N0.0z.20 .0.02.20 0.542.2.N000.00.z.5000.50 .500...0.05.23 .. xx u 2 5000\50 u 2x 0.542%w000 n 5000 2X\00 u N000 z n 2x 0. .. 05 00 ~000\5000 H 0.542 2X\50 n 5000 2X\00 N000 u xx u 2x 0 0 o000.5.z. 0>000 0040 0¢~oz.20 .ozou.0.z. 20015 0040 m¢~oz.2o 020.0.20 0405: 0040 ¢4~oz.20 .4.0.2. 4024 0040 m¢~oz.20 .mzx.5.m.z. 3x00 0040 ~¢Noz.20 02002.0.20 200>I 0040 .¢~oz.20 0.0.5.0.20 >0040 0040 o¢~oz.20 0000 05 00 .005mz.50.a00. omm02020 2.. u a 0m 00 mmmoz.20 mmoox u mwoox 5m~oz.20 0 omwoz.20 02.5 zo 4002200 00202000.0|III30 mmmoz.20 0242200 20020 502.0 02.0: 020.54000040 00202000.o 05.2.0 2.00mnllnnu ¢m~oz.20 0 mmmoz.20 ..o*.o.\20>00*00*o.¢ u ¢4 mmwoz.2o m00x0>02 u mm4 .mmoz.20 o.0.*2\000*0 u N4 omwoz.20 02*0000\5zz*2*0>02 u ..4 ommoz.20 0 0-oz.20*********************************«*************************************0 5N~oz.20 020.54000040 2.0mmulnllu 0-oz.20****************§****************«*************************************0x 0-02.20 0 ¢N~oz.20 .xx..>4oam**20\040.xm..xm..>4QI~**:0\20.I¢..xm.0>4oum**20\zw.m 0NN02.20I¢..x0..2.0.Im.x0...2.0010.x0...0.000010.x0..2.00I0.x0...20.I¢.xm.¢ NNN02.20. I.\.2004> 20543:...x0¢.520z.10. z.\.x000 >02020I...x0.x000 2004>0 .NN02.2010..x¢.x000 0.00.01...x0.0420 000: 000010..XN.00 0420 00021~..xm.0~ 0NN02.202054200205I...x¢.20.542054010..x0.20.5.00010.x0. 02.520..I..542200 000. 0.N0z.20 .000...0.05.23 0.N0z.20 0 5.N0z.20 020.54000040 00202000.0 05.2.0.200 0040 005.5 500 52.20IIIII0 162 mmNozmmw mm Oh 00 th02020 oo+woooooo u .~+_.> ammozumw Nm Oh ow .oo+mOOOOo~oh0.A~+_0m.0~ 4H mmmozmmo ma Oh Do ¢mNQZ~20 N0wo\.A—I~.h I .~.h.*.~.OZOUI u ._00 mmmoz~2o N0wo\..~lu.zx I 0—03x.*...~03x I N mmwozmaw oo+wcoo.~.*.0_0h # No+mm~m~omv.\..~.m I oo+wooo.~.*omool u ._.oz ammozmdo oo+mmwo~*§.mo+wm~m>om\..u0h + No+wm~mhom..*doo N 0200 mm ommoz—mw .oo+wo00on I N0m0\..ulm.~m I ._.~m..*m0w\.~.ZOUII u .~.> 4m ohmozumw mm Oh ow mhmozumo oo+woooo.o u ._.> hpmozumo 4m DH 00 .oo+wOOOOodoh0oA—0m00_ 0H o~N02_20 mu Oh ow mhmozmmo oo+mooco.o u .H+~0o ¢>Nozmmw oo+moooc.o u A~+~002 mpmozamo oo+woooooo u aH+~0> thozmmw u ~>NQZ~2G 223000 00 Zth30 h< mzouhmozou >m4aznom >0~0w0mIIIIIu Ohmozumo u oomozumw 4m Oh ow .z.mz.~.0~ mH moN02~20 mg Op 00 homozumw ~0w0\..~0h I .u+~.h.*.~+—.QZOUI u .~+_.O oomozumw N0w0\..~.1x I .u+~.zx.*...a+_.zx I oo+m N 00N02~20000o~0*.ad+~0h + No+wm~m>om_.\..n+~.w I oo+w000o~.*omool u AH+~002 Hm ¢o~ozumw .oo+mooo.~ I N0mo\a.—.~m I .d+~.~m..*maw\.~+~.zDUII u .~+_.> om mowozmxw Hm Oh Do NON02~20 oo+wooco.o u 0H+00> Homozumw on OF 00 .OOOOoHoh0o.H+~.m.0— oomozmmw ..—_h I om.*m0w.\xz0~0 u .uvwz mmmazumw oo+wcooooo u .~.> thoz~2w oo+wmh.~#*.mo+wmum>ow\~A~+—.h + No+wm~mhom..*moo n 0200 omNozumw It0~0fimo+woccno¢ u XIO~0 mmmozumm u ¢mNoszw wu<0¢3m pd ZO_h_onu >¢4DZDO® >0~0w0mIIIIIu mmNQzumw 0 163 FREE! . .m- ¢Nm0zum0 .¢~.¢Nwm.x¢m. I~\.¢~.¢Nw¢.0.m~w.om. Id0h42200 cued MNm02020 .000.zz.wamm>..~003x.._03x..~.h..00m.~.fi .0H0~.~o.wh023 NNm02020 0 HNm02020 00004) 0wh40000<0 #00 ~2000IIIII0 0Nm0zmmo 0 o~m02000 m~§~0w0 u N 0Hm02020 g I n u mN >~m0z~20 .0.0Z*N< u 32 camoznmo .~.>*mam u mawm> 0H mam02020 0 + N000x u mw00x ¢Hm02000 ma 0h 00 .Zomzo000m m~m02~20 NH 0h 00 .OowZomm00x I 0000 N~m02020 o~ 0h 00 .#.OwoN000x000 04 H~m02020 .0000 I 00+00000.~0\.._.p + N0+wm~m>oN0*.~.0 u Anvzx 0¢ 0~m02020 04 0h 00 oom02~20 .m0mzx u .mvzx 00m02020 0¢ 0h 00 000+00000o~oh0o.—0m00u >0m02020 .00<>w*.._.h + N0+wm~m0.N0\m4*._.<*.~0>0m0 + N oom02—20 Am*..~0h + N 40m02~20 No+wm~m~oN0\._0<*m< I N000\..—00z I .~+—.0200*h0w0 I .000 u A~00 mom02020 .004>m*..~0h N Nom02020 + No+mm~m0.N0\._.8*H< + N000\..—0> I 0~+~.>.0*h0w0 I A—0m u .00m dom0z020 mam*~< u m4 00m02~m0 00400*mm< u m4 ©0N02020 00400§~H< u ~< momozmmo 00+mmhoa*#ANo+mm~m>.N\..00h + No+wmdmhoN00 u 00400 ~0NOZ~20 .mvzx I 0—0m3x u 00<>w 0H ooN02020 0 mON02~20 hzwzwm0Z~ wx—h hxwz 01# #4 mm00<~¢<> wh<0000<0IIIII0 ¢0NOZ~20 0 m0N02020 N0w0\..~0h I .~+—0h0*.~+_00200l u .~+~.O NON02~20 ~000\..~03x I .~+—.zx.*...~+—03x I 00+000N ~0N0202000.~0*..~+_0h + No+meMPoN00\..~+_0m I 00+00000o~0§0200l u 0H+~002 00NOZ~20 00+wm>.~#*.~0+mm~m~oN\..~+—.h + N0+wmam>ovaumo0 n 0000 mm 00N02020 000+00000.~ I N0w0\..u.~m I .~+~—~m..*maw\.H+—.ZD0II u .~+—.> Nm 164 Amm02020 020 ommozmmo ..wzouh42wh~10~.0~. u 3 .zo—pqz—tmmh 04220210N.OIH.h1 wZ—000000m 0 :m 200:0 ..m.0.m.20>2040 0200002000 0 mm 000:0 . 0 mm 000:2 .0002020000 00 0200002000 0 0m 000:2 :040 .2420020 202 00 024000002 024 00200002000 020200000 0:0 0 cm 00020 0 ON QA—IQ*****#***fl********§*§******************************%**§***************U 0m 200:2 0 0m 000:0 .220000 040 4 20 0240 00 020020 20.040042 0:0 00 000400200 0 cm 200:2 02000 2000020 040004 0:0 .4000: 000200 20 2004: 00 02020>02 0 mm 200:0 004:0 0:0 200 00002 04000420:042 4 024 020004000 0>004 0:0 0 ¢~ 000:2 0 m0 000:2 0 mm 200:0 0 HN 01:10 MIN LI 0 ON 00:00 .1 II 0 00 00010 AMICanstII). +1 .0 0 00 200:2 0 00 000:2 0 00 20:0 sumo K MW. WW ..I. WWI U 0 .1 20:0 2 c 3: .sxxo BRO... H Fl Ffl 0 .2 20:0 fibula; 3 In? 0 NH 20”}. $.fl W 6. HQ.“ w .3 00 :0 a. 3. 4 IIIIIHI 2 00:2 A: a\.<$.>\leN . Mfl 0 o 200:2 .0020200000 000200 00 00:002 0 0 000:0 0:0 >0 2000020 04000420:042 020300000 0:0 00>000 2420020 00:0 0 0 200:0 0 o 200:2 0 m2: 00~0 00 00200002200 020~ 0200..2000020 20.0.0200 02402000 02.»24> 0200ununn0 m 000:0 2000022 200000>200 000200uuunu0 ¢ 000:0 000 .02 00200000 200020 2420020 2020 0000.002 02020IIIII0 m 200:2 0002> 00 024 2000:0 00 020004000 0:0 00>000 2420022Iannn0 N 00020 N0 20242 0N 24>0z .0.0uuanu0 0 200:2 .002000u000040.00020uoo0240.000000.0022..000—:2 2420020 166 167 ah 0h 00 00 we 00 mo ¢0 no No 00 00 on mm 50 00 mm ¢m mm Nm am 00 o¢ 0¢ >¢ 0¢ m¢ ¢¢ m¢ N¢ ~¢ 0¢ 0m 0m hm om 00020 40002 000200 020 00 >00>00000200 0422020 0>0000000 0000200IIIII0 000:0 0000\00000 I 00*0003x u 2x0 >0 0000>00 2000420200200 .000IIIII0 00020 .20x00 000420 000000 024 040 2002000 4024 04004020020 .004IIIII0 00020 I 0 00020 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 0 00020 2000020000 0004024) 20000200 0 00020 0 00010 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 0 00010 00004.24> 20000200 00 02000—20000 0 00020 0 000I0*********§***********»*************«******u****************************0 00020 0 00010 .0000 000: 0200 0 00020 20 200042000 0:0 200:: 04 200202 200042000 010 000000000 00002 0 00020 .0200042000 0200 0 000200>00 >20>0 000 0002—20 00 0002 00000020 020 .0 n 0000: 00 .00024x0 0 00020200 .000 0002020 00 00 024 00000020 020 20000 20: 000000000 00002 0 00020 .0 04 00002 20 0402 .0000 00 0000 0 00020 00 00042 020 >0~0000 00 002—000 00 00 00 .0200000200 0400020 0 00010 024 .20004220020 040020202 .0200000200 >2402000 .0200024240 0 00020 04000>I0 0:0 20 0200402 200 0000 0042200 010 >000000 00 2000 020 0 00020 000420 00 0000 024 0042200 0004024> 0:0 .¢~02 .0002 .0002 .0002 0 00010 024 0042200 0004024> 020 .20004220020 042200 0004024> 0:0 00020 0 00020 00 0000 00 020200400 0402 020000 020 .20004220020 0020 000 02.20 0 0002000 0000 00 .00002002 0004024> 020 .042200 ¢40~ 0:0 2— 20004220020 0 00010 04020> 20 0402 00 2000 020 0000420 020200400 0402 00200 020 0 00010 0 00020 20004220020 0002. 0 00020 0 000:0******************##*«**********************************u**************0 00020 0 00020 .>000.0.z.0>000 0200002000 0 00.20 20200.0.2020020 0200002000 0 00020 000.0.2004002 0200002000 0 00020 04.0.2.4024 0200002000 0 00020 .03x.0.0.203x00 0200002000 0 168 .0000 20. 40002 000200 00 2000420040 .1000 N000\0000 u 0—042 A.22000l0001l20\m**10l2040 02400200 340 040 A>4QIN**20\0400 x000 >02020 0>004—042 .0000 20. 40002 000200 20 x000 >02020 0>~0000200 .2040 00410 040 20 02000020 .>40IN#*20\200 00410 040 20 x000 20042 2\0 >0 owe—>00 00410 040 20 x000 20043 002010202— 00400 00 200202 .00002I20\200 20043 00 010—03 240000002 0020202020 0100 00 200202 202—x42 010 .>40\t00 02004200200 00 20000200 4 04 40002 000200 010 20 000410 0000—0 024 040 010 200000 02000000000 20002420 0042 004 20>0 A>40\200 o0 0N 04 40002 000200 010 20 000420 0000—0 024 040 010 200000 020~0~00000 20002420 0042 004 20>0 200202 020202020 0200 010 020020002002 200002_ 0000 00 200202 0202020z~ 00400 010 020020002002 20000Z~ 0000 00 .>40\20. >0—>—0000200 0~00420>1 .>40\20. 40002 000200 024 0201000204 010 2002000 00402002— 010 04 02000000000 20002420 0042 2000 00010.0.000l>40lm**20\04u. 40002 000200 024 0201000204 010 2003000 0040200z~ 010 04 02000000000 20002420 0401 2000 A.H.xx I 20002x. 00200 020>m20 200042004>0 .2000 40001 000200 00 >0—00200 .>40\N**200 02004200200 00 20~00200 4 04 204 20 20043 200 02000000000 20—000000 >24Z—020 .>40\N**20. 000100200 0 04 204 Zn 20043 200 02000—00000 20_0000~0 >24z—020 00000010 00000010 moH00~10 40000010 00000010 N0000010 00000010 00000010 00 00010 00 00010 00 00010 00 00010 00 00010 40 00010 mo 00010 No 00010 Ho 00010 00 00010 00 00010 00 00010 00 00010 00 mm 00010 40 00~I0 mm 00—10 mm 00010 00 00010 00 00010 00 00 00010 00 00010 00 00010 00 00010 ¢0 00010 m0 00010 N0 00010 .20. 20002400 220000 0000000 .20. 20002400 220000 000020 .20. w-0 020202020 00400 220\040. 20043 00 20—04~_2004> 00 0401 .0>40. 0-0 020202020 0200 .20. 100200 220000 ..0.000l>40l20\0400 .0.0uuuuu0 00042uuauuu 2uuansu 2oaauuuu ._.ounnuuu 0asunuu xzaununu ._.oznuuuau zunuusu 0:2uuauuu znnuusu u u 20>oxuzuuuu u 0>oxuuunuu sunnuuo Huanusu ._.zooxuusuuu 0 220.0nunuuu u 22000auuun0 004>0ununnu 000uuuuuu u o2oonnuuuu u 2oouuunuu oounnsnu mouuuauu ~00ouuuanu ._.>00ouuunnu 0000uuuauu 0unuuuuu 0 169 m¢~a4HIa N¢~QJ_IQ H¢~aamxa O¢Ha4~1a omfiaamIa mmaagfixa hmHaana omdaamxa mmHQAHIQ ¢m~a4~Ia mmHa4~Ia deaafixa Hmaaaura omdaamra omaaaura mmdaamxa NNHQAHIQ 0N~QA_IQ mmdaamza ¢~ht.M—ht.~—hi.-pt .OOOH.Ho.wh~mz .¢ hzuma 024 z— 34mmlllllu u uzupz AaooH.~o.wp—13 0N .¢..om .h..om vum..om .m..om .0 N ..om .oz..om .ZOUI..om .>4mo..om .ozou..om .u zo~m2wz~o zz.oz.h3z.¢w>0x.m>ox 44mm 0 ¢m~a4~Ia***************************************u*******************************u mmaa4HIa******************»«*****************«****«********************a*****u*u -~aa~Ia#******************u******************u*******************************uu awaaauxa u omdaamxa Azu. m4m<~m<> wulllllu ¢-Q4~IQ.A_OW do. <~owz mnoxoa Zn mm~<3 Gaza—4 mo xaau u—mhw2240> ._.>lllllu mgaaauza ..U.0w9l>o am>03lllllu HAHQAHIQ .auom do. (new: mzoxoa mo mmzh<¢mQth .mvhlllllu Oadaaura .ou.0wo. wxnh<¢ma2mh h2m—Qtd (hllullu OOHQJHIA .m>m<44~a~a4~xa u mNHaJHIa zo~h~a4_1a .\.****m ~>~a4~Ia§***************u*************************«******n****************N Hh~¢4~Ia*****************«u*************************§*****:oNn.OIH. hquOm coca OhaaauIa .ooo~.~o.wh_m3 ooaaauIa .®.m¢m..oowcl>o 44<¢ h0~Q4~IQQIN**zu\A dwh<3 mo 20m codaamzamhumozuao.<3x.oaumo.m hmaaquraom.o¢w.awhNw..>DImm.OI~\.moc~w..>m<2~oa©Io¢.OI~\.w.m~w.xmm.A.2—0. >h¢ ¢m~a4HIQ~mO¢OQImH.OI~\.m.m~w.xmm...tu. OH ztaaouzmd.OI~\.wome.xmm.Aazu. om mm~a4~1ao ZXDJOUImH.OI~\.w.m~w.me...ZU. Ihwzwa ZIDJOUIOH.OIa\\.oZmbm>m mIN deagmzah xom mdmhwz1a mo hm~4 < m— oz—IDJAOm thINo.HIH.hog.moc.mam.”9.00.4u .mooH.Ho.w»_az cm~a4~xa m.pzz.a.m>ox.moa.maw.Ho.oo.4u .-pz.oo.om mow mxwpmzxa hzmaa 924 z_ oqwaanauuu >¢Ha4_za u o¢~a4~xa .¢.o1~\.o~ ¢¢~a4~1a th mu wz~3044om thIMm.OI~.h mmhdz .MHomem.x¢.m~.ONw.xo.oH—vh¢~a4_za u o¢~a4_xa .>4mo.p.z. a>4mo 44z 44aao:*oo*o.¢ u ¢< Ammaamza mAmxm>ox u mm< om~a4_za o.m~*a\maw*a u ~< o-a4_xa .mumam.\h32«a*m>ox u Aaq mmmaauza u -~a4~Ia*********a******§**#******u**§*****************************************u om~a4~za mzo_h<4:uJ mmh<31-.xm¢.hmuz_zo. IH\.x24m >omw2m1-.xm.x34m moa<>m ONNQA~IQIO~.X¢.x34m QHDO~4I-.xm.u mmNaamxa Nm Oh ow .oo+wooooo~oh4..d+~.m.mu ¢~ ¢mNaa_Iq ma 0» Do mmNa4~Ia NAwD\..~I~.h I .~.h.*.~.QZOUI n ._.O N®NQ4~IQ Ngwo\..~lmvzx I .~_3x.*...~.xx I N HmNQAHIQ oo+wooo.~.*..~_h + No+mm~m>oN..\.._.m I oo+wooo.~_*omool u ._.oz omNaauxa oo+wmhodfifiANo+mem~.N\..—.h + No+wm~mhoN..*moo u omoo mm OhNagmxa .oo+mooo.~ I ~4m0\..~lu.~m I ._.—m..*maw\._.zooII u ._.> ¢m QNNQAHIQ mm Oh ow NNNQJ~IQ oo+wcooooo u g_.> ONNQAHIQ ¢m 0» Do .oo+m0000o~.h4o.~.m.m~ ca thaamxa m~ Oh Do thQ4_Ia oo+woooooo u .~+_.O ##NQJHIa oo+moooooo u AH+—.QZ mwNQJNIQ oo+woooooo u .H+~.> NhNaaura U HNNQA_IQ zzDAOu mo iohbom h< m20-~ozou >mm~owamIIIIIu OhNaamza u GONaauxa ¢~ op 00 Azowz.~.m— MA QONadmIa mg Oh Do NONadmxa Nam0\..—.h I .~+~.hvfiad+_.QZOUI u A~+~.O ooNQAHIa ~4w0\..~.3x I .~+—.zx.*...~+~.3x I oo+w N mONaguzaooo.~.*..d+—.h + No+wm~m>.N..\..~+—.m I oo+wooo.~.*omOOI u A~+~vwz Hm ¢0Na4~1a Aoo+moooou I Ngwo\..~.~m I .~+_.~m..#mam\.~+_.ZOUII u .~+_.> om McNaauIa am Oh Do NONQAHIQ oo+moooooo u .H+~.> a0NQ4—Ia om Oh ow .ooooouohgo.~+~.m.mu OONQA~IQ .._.h I thaguIa oo+mm>.~**.No+wm~m>oN\..~+—.h + No+wmum>oN.vixoo u omoo omNaamla Izdmmfimo+wooofio¢ u xIJ—m mmNa4~Ia u ¢mNaamxa mu¢m~umamIIIIIu mmNa4~Ia u NmNaguza m— Oh O0 .~owz.—.m— 174 0Nma3~1a 02w OHMQAHIQ ..m200h4me~I~A.O—. u 3 .200h42011wh 3..~0m3x.._.3x..~0h.._.muw.fi .0~0~.~o.wh~mx fiamaamza 0 OHMQAHIQ mw33<> Dmh<3304<0 #30 h2—«QIIIII0 oomanga 0 momma~ra m~*~300 u N homaquza d I u u mN OOMQAHIQ .~.02*N< u 32 momaamla A~0>fimam u mawm> OH ¢0ma3~Ia 3 + Nwoox u mwoox momaaaza an 0» 00 .z.wz.~.¢~ NOMQAHIQ NH 0» 00 .OowZomwoox I fi.¢_ HOMQA—Ia mu 0h 00 .~.Owon00x0mH comma—Ia .N024w0%._.>3w0*N< + N owNaamra A I .~+—.>00*h3m0 I ._.m u .mvm NGNaqua . ~300\..~002 I .~+_.02. u ~02300 ma OONa3_IQ 0 mONaauIa hszmmuzm wzuh hxwz th #4 mmq©<~¢<> wb<3303<0IIIII0 «0Na301a 0 NONQ3~IQ N400\AA—_h I .~+_.h.*.~+~.0200I u .H+_.O ~0NQ3~IQ N3w0\..~03x I A~+uvzx.#...~+—.3x I 00+w00N OONQJHIa00.~.*..~+_.h + N0+mmam>.N..\..~+~.m I 00+00000.~0*0d00I u .~+_00z owNaagla 00+mm>.=§*.~0+wm~m>oN\.A~+~0h + N0+wmfim~oN..*100 u 0&00 mm mmmaa—1a I .00+w0000.~ I N3w0\.._.~m I .~+~._m..#maw\.~+~.ZDUII u .H+_.> Nm tha3~Ia mm or 00 175 ¢HMQ3~IQ ¢HMQAHIQ ¢dma301a 0¢NQ3~IQ 0¢NQ3~IQ 0¢NQ3~IQ 0¢NQ3~IQ 0¢N¢3~IQ 0¢NQ3~IQ 0¢NQ3~IQ 0¢NQ3~IQ 0¢NQ3~IQ 0¢NQ3~IQ 0¢NQ3~IQ NMNaauza ‘ Ir ti- .1 3 .\.N~.0Nm. u .XN.N~.0Nw. u «o amzzo oONm. u «hIm .XN.NHo0Nw.v n .m20uh—0200 >a<02300IoN 43x10 .01~.hm<02300 01m>x<> mt—h Ihmz Q—J—Ia mom w0m<0***#*# amz*mw~.m u Izgmm oo.¢~\z_h u z_h .amz.z_». amozuz 43m0 20~h<~002 mmh<3 mm00< mIH wUZwmw¢u_0 mhfizmm m0 001#02 mIH >m 2m300a§ 3<0~H30m 2 UUUUUUQUUUUUUUUQU m200h<3303m mo mHZmzmamaxm 20am 2302: mm >mxm ZOHPDJOw .moo_xma wpxo oz~3330m zqaooma mHIhIIIIIu u ******xa_EZH zoz .p.4IIIIIu u “PDQhDQflvowa0 00 mo ¢o mo No Ho 00 am mm hm cm mm ¢m mm mm Hm 0m o¢ m¢ >¢ o¢ m¢ ¢¢ m¢ N¢ H¢ 0¢ om mm hm ZQZZH 0 zazz_ A><0\.200 whm PzIIIII0 zazza .><0\.20. mhIIIII0 zazzm A><0\20. amh >IIIII0 zazzH ..ZHQ. 20—h413hqm wAm_03ommd~ md3mmIIIII0 zazzfi ..20. 3m<43_Q<0 HmIIIIIU zazzfi .ozm0. 20~p >££30 mZHPZIIIIIU ZQZZH .><0\.20. >h~>~h030230 00331 Z0UIIIIII0 zazz~ A.ZHQ. >hum0¢0Q 40002 m30m0a m0 300m QOIIIIIU ZQEZH ..20. FZmemUZH m0<00 thZwauzm wz—h th #300IIIII0 zazzm ..zu. mhw w>~h<33230 a<>230IIIII0 ZQZZH A.200 Ihwzwa 223300 10 Ihamo 300m 30IIIII0 ZQZZH IIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ZQZZH zompmzumwo . m3m<~a<> awh3a200 zazzH zazzH InnunuuquauIaanu nnnnn unuusuuunan ZQZZH mw30<~m<> mmh3Q200 m0 ZOHkHZHuwo Zazzfi za23_****«*************#«*»***********«************************************u zazzu ZQZZH .ZOUI.m.20200>I mz~h30m03m zazzm .Hm.m.zvmaa<0 wth30xm3m zazxm zazzfiwoma wI» 23x Op >xw zazxm hzb~m0m0Q 300m 024 UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU zazzm Ibawo 300m th mh3az— hZMthd01N¢.01~0h<2d0¢ m00~ meazazzm £0h00>.m¢3mm.um3m> .moo~.~o.wh_m37 ¢0Hzazzu A0.0Num0h.mm3m> .¢00~.oo.om mom m20~h~0200 >m<0230m Hzmma 024 z— 0b~m0N mo zazszOaIHH. IH.\\.20 I¢.N~.0Nm. n 1#0203 22330010~.OI~.\\\.OIHOhm d0¢ mmmhmzIa Hzmma 024 2— 04mm IIIII 0 No zazzu 0 do zazzfi A\\.****m co zmzzm*******************«*****************u****u***********************N ow 2&2:H******************»**«***************«************Iowa.o:~0 #42101 oooH mm ZQZZH .000~.Ho.mh~m3 hm £a23~ mzmhz .n00~.~00wh~az 00H 00 zazz~ A¢<0N0h..0m 0m 20~m2mz_0 N» zazzm 0 Oh Zazzu 0 mp zazz_**»***************««*u*************u*«**********************4**********u ¢> zazz~******************«******************u****»****************************u mp zaz3_«*«*«*************##*u***********u***«********u****»*******************u 180 ¢¢Hza23~ m¢~zazz~ N¢Hzazzm .0003.~o.mhmm3 30.0Nm.N3w0 0h H300 10 0~h<00 pzwzwmuzm wZ~h m0 w-mION.OIH\.0.0Nm.3m><00 wZN mm~2a23-~ ZOHP<33£mm Z3zmx<210m.01~\\.20~p<2¢0mz_ 3<0~mwXDZI—N.~Ifivh00~ >m~2a23~ o~pmm>w mam haahso 24 mwm3~p mzp wzh omwN o» 34:0m be: m_ Hwoox mmnunanu m33zazzH .owm: m“ z— om3 03m_03omm§_ th #4 mm Z0~h4¢3h4m w04um3m m~ wmm 0h x0wI0IIIII0 hwfizazzm I 0 chdzazzu m~ 0h 00 .Homzomvmm mhfizazzfi z.hm4hm_ u 0 N3 00 ¢~Hia23~ .200I.m.20200>x 3340 mwfizazzfi .Hm.m.zvmaa40 3340 Nhazazzm 0 ahfizazzmh030200 00334mQ>I 024 wm3wmwma >m433~¢40 10 m>4mm4 wa Z— mmmm24mhIIIII0 ONHzazzm 0 oofizazzu @000 0b 00 AQOhmzohwohfi0mn modzazxu 2.3 u #3 mg 00 Nodzazz~ Nmoox u mwoox oodzazzu H u hm4hmn moazazzm 0 ¢o~za23~ .m20~h4330340 w0mewmmuo mbmzmm zuowmIIIII0 moazazzm 0 Nonazzu 0.000003 u wink Hoazaizm 0.0 u I0mzmh oonazzm 0.0 u a4>z30 omfizazzfi A***************»#***ICN.xHH.**************I¢~.x~.**************¢ mmazaz3_*1mfi.x~3.**********:o~.on.******#*Im.xm.**«***********I¢H. I~.\..m pmdza230200oa4>m m>~p433z30ION.x-..>40\z00 .~.>z¢~.x~..>40\z00 AH+~0>Im~N cmdzazzm mmazazzm ¢m~£a£3~ mmdzazzm Nmazazz_ amazazzm Omazazzm o¢dzazzm m4~zazz~ N¢Hzazzn o¢azazzm m¢~zazz~ .XN~.20_h4m3h4mIOH.xod.zouhmmDQIO.XN.HZwtwm0z~ wzmhI¢~.~I~0H4zm0m HHOH .wfiofiuao0whmmz 0 004a m3h~h P30 hzmmaIIIII0 0 .000~.Ho0wh_az ..NH.0Nwm0.\\.***#wm4 m20~p~0200 34Hhmzm mIpIOm.OI~.\\.OIHOh4szm ©00~ .Z.Hu~.._0m0 .0003.~o.mh_m3 .0.0Nm40h42m01 mood .z.~u_..~0m. .000~.00004mm 0 ozmhm>m mom m20~h~0200 34~h~2~ hzmma 024 Z— 04wmIIIII0 182 OHNEQZKH mHNzaZZH ¢~Nzazzm mfiNzazzm Nszazzm HuNiazzu OHNzazzm GONzazzm 00N£azzm NONZQZIH GONzazzm mONzazzm ¢0Nza23~ mONZQ23~ NONZQEZH HONzazzm 00Nzazzm oodzazzm 00~zazz~ hodzazzm oonazzm monazzm ¢o~zazzm MOHZQZZM NOH2a23~ #032023“ Conazzn omazazzm mmdzazxm hwazazzm ad oh so 1w21p.m3.:umzap.11 mozmhzou NH .ooofi.fio.mp_mz N3 Oh so .z.wz._.111 .NH.on.x¢.NH.omm.x¢.NH.o~m.x¢.~H.ONm.x¢.o.oHI.xm.o-. IH.hz:u..1.>..d+_.>..”.m.~.pa .ofiofi.fio.wh_¢3 >3 pa + mmoox u mmoox #3 Oh so .z.wz._.1_ NH ch ow .o.mz.mmoox I pa.1_ NH oh ow ._.0m.~woox.1_ p3wo*pa u zomzmh _x*~3wo u N 3 I _ I 1x ~3ma\.._.> I .~+H.>.*p3mo I ._.m u ._.m 01 .oooo.3 I ~3mo\..~I_._m I.H._m..*mam\._.zouxI ._.> .oooo.~ I ~3mo\.._.~m I .H+_._m..umaw\.fi+_.zouxI u .~+_.> I1 01 ab ow zo~om> u .H+_.> 0 20~hm0200 >m402300 SOPHOm hwmIIIII0 0 ¢~ 0h 00 Azowzou0m~ ma 0H 0h 00 .0000.~ I N300\..00~m I AH+~.Hm..#maw\AH+00200II u .H+~0> .~.>%h300 + Q4>z30 Q4>230 mm3m> u “—0> OH 0 .200h00200 >m402300 w04mm3m hmeIIII0 0 .\\\.20~h4mmh~ mink hxwz 2m omazazzmo 200mm m20—w4330340 wh4m 02~334uz¢m .OIH\..m>4QIm.xm.0H.m~wu u mZN mmazazzmmh ¢032a23~ mmazazzm Nwdzazzm Hmaiazzm .0010401 2000 m4: .mm3mm0 20~h4m3h%h3m0 + a4>z30 Q4>z30 ¢Ho~ 0000 mH APPENDIX J OVER ALL WALL HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT CALCULATION 184 Radial energy losses from the soil column (see Figure 10) involves heat conduction through the soil, the column wall, and the insulation. An energy balance on the column wall or insulation gives the following equation. 3T __ 3 (J.l) pCp '—t-- 32(k 3T 1 8 82 r 3r (rk 3;) when Equation (J.l) can be written as Equation (J.2), 3 3T _ (J.2) fika 5; - 0 the over all heat transfer coefficient can be calculated in the following manner. The radial heat flows are: (J.3) qfiDOdz = UonDOdz(TA-T) = hnDodz(TA-T3) / I I-I . I :/ Insulation‘—' . : /// Wall — T , _ _ / A 8011 i /I_/L / H In” lé—Dw‘“) o ’l TTT T 12 3 185 186 ( 4) Do (T3‘T2) (Tz’Tl) J. q2n—— dz = -k.2wdz = -k 2ndz 2 l ln(Do/Dw w ln(Dw/Di) (T -‘I‘) _ l _ _ fQE _ keZNdzln(Di7D*7 - kiZNdz IQE r Equation (J.3) and (J.4) can be combined to give (J 5) U = 1 ° 0 D 1n(D./D*) ln(D /D.7 ln(D /D ) _g E 1 + w i + o w + 2 2 k k k. hD e w i o The diameters and materials of construction for the soil column in Figure 12 have been given in Table 1. The thermal conductivities for these materials are: ke = 8.5 x 10 4 cal/cm-sec-OC(for saturation = 0, data of Moench) 4 cal/cm-sec-°C(for p1exig1ass--acrylic resin, data from Polymer Handbook, eds., J. Brandrup, E. Immergut, Interscience, N.Y., 1966). k = 5 x 10' W k. = 8.26 x 10'5 l cal/cm-sec-OC(for styrofoam, data from Principles of Polymer Systems, F. Rodriquez, McGraw Hill, NoYo’ 1970). 2 4 for 9* = 9.2 cm and h = 1 btu/hr-ft -OF (1.355 x 10’ cal/cmzvsec-OC), the over all heat transfer coefficient is 6 U0 = 6.35 x 10- cal/cm-sec-OC = 0.548 cal/cmZ-day-OC 187 The value of the film coefficient (h) is reasonable for low wind velocities and the over all coefficient is not that sensitive to the film coefficient. The resistance controlling the over all coefficient is the insulation as is shown below. (J.5*) U0 = 4 41 4 4 = 6.35 x 10'6 1 .13x10 + .257x10 + 14.62x10 + .74x10 i. soil wall insulation film coeff. APPENDIX K SURFACE FILM COEFFICIENTS 188 The wind velocity at the soil surface has an effect on the surface film mass transfer and heat transfer coefficients. To estimate these coefficients for the soil column in Figure 12, some heat and mass transfer correlations for laminar flow past a flat plate will be used. * i; (K.1) Nu = 0.664 ReLJ’EPrl/3 Reference: Bennett, C.O. Myers, E J.E.,Momentum, Heat, and Mass -~ 8 1/3 Transfer, McGraw—Hill, N.Y., (K.2) Sh = 0.664 ReL Sc 1962, p. 302, 476. where, km SL (K.3) Sh = ’ .an hsL (K.4) Nu = —k—- V Lp (K.5) ReL = —3—— 0 Using the properties of air at room temperature and a wind velocity of four miles per hour and a dimension of L = 27 cm, the surface film heat transfer coefficient is calculated to be hS = 1.8 btu/hr-ftZ-OF = 21.1 cal/cmz- day-0C. By combining Equations (K.1) and (K.2) the surface film mass transfer coefficient can be calculated to be 189 190 (K.6) k Nu S 1/3 m,s Pr 4100' hS (cm/day). 86510 cm/day APPENDIX L CALCULATION OF PART OF THE CAPILLARY POTENTIAL--SATURATION FUNCTION FOR VALENTINE SAND 191 It can be seen from Equation (1.5) that at steady state the volumetric flux of water is constant. Before the actual drying of valentine sand, Hanks, et al. wet the sand covered it, and allowed it to redistribute for a week. The resultant distribution was a saturation profile corresponding to the initial conditions for simulation numbers 3-6 (see Figures 16,17). Assuming that during the week an equilibrium saturation distribution was reached, the capillary potential-—saturation function can be cal- culated over the range of saturations in the initial condition saturation profiles (Figures 16,17). (L.l) v° = —K(§§ - 1) = o, w=w then, (L.2) ‘y(5)|z -‘¥(S)Iz == (z-zo) O The data points in Figure 9 identified as being calculated were calculated from Equation (L.2) and the initial condition data of Hanks et al. The capillary potential at saturation was taken to be (L.3) 4(5 = 1)]zO= 45 = —1 cm. It is not uncommon for air bubbles to cause capillary potentials of this magnitude when the saturation is essentially one. 192 APPENDIX M COMPARISON OF CONDUCTIVE ENERGY FLUX AND CONVECTIVE ENERGY FLUXES 193 From data obtained from simulation number 5 and contained in Table 7, the conductive energy flux can be compared with the convective energy fluxes which represent the energy transfer by the movement of liquid and vapor water. When time = 40 days, we have the following: at z=0 (M.1) q = +37l.04 cal/cmz-day _ _ 0: _ _ 2 _ (M.2) qL — OLCpL(T Tref)v 1.0(48.5 25.0)0 — 0.0 cal/cm day _ ~ _ —_ _ —-_ 2— (M.3) qV — Nwapr(T Tref)‘ .0360(48.5 25.)— .845 cal/cm day where, q,qL, and qV are the conductive, liquid convective, and vapor convective energy fluxes respectively. at z=9 (M.4) q = +248.95 (M.5) qL = 1.0(39.8—25.)(-.10892E-02)=-.01615 (M.6) = -.34923E-01(39.8—25.)=-.516 qv From looking at the fluxes in Table 7 at 40 days it can be seen that the energy fluxes due to convective flow at lower depths are also negligible compared to the conductive energy fluxs. 194 195 At t = 3 days, the convective flow energy terms in comparison to the conductive energy term seems to be about the largest. This is the start of the falling rate period. at z=0 (M.7) q = 824.07 (M.8) qL = 1.0(26.8-25.)(0) = 0.0 (M.9) qv = -.14409E+01(26.8—25.) = —2.45 at z=9 (M.lO) q = 45.391 (M.ll) qL = l.0(26.0+25.)(-.11182E+Ol)=—l.1182 (M.lZ) = -.13005E—02(26.0-25.)=-.013005 qv comparison between q and qL and qv: qL+qV (M.13) % = x 100 = -113.1/45.391 = 2.49 At other depths for t=3 days, the ratio of convective flow to conductive energy flux will be smaller than 2.49%. At the beginning of the falling rate period the convective energy fluxes can be as high as 2%% of the conductive flux at z=9 cm. At other depths this per cent falls to about %%. Also after the falling rate period is underway the maximum % convective to conductive flux occurs at z=9 cm. and the % is about %. As an example see Equations (M.l-M.6). APPENDIX N COMPUTER PROGRAM SUBROUTINES CONTAINING NATURAL WEATHER TIME VARYING BOUNDARY CONDITIONS 196 HNM¢MONQOOHNM¢M~ON®OOF'NMQ’IAO r-Iv-OI-IH—I—I—II-I—INNNNNNNNNNMMMMMMM HNMQ’U‘OI‘QO‘O .4 «430m 03.m~.m~ .o.m3Iwz_».1~ 4H m43om zmzhmm x430m o.moo~ + .o.-Imz_h.*.¢~ u 04mg ma m430m 4H.m~.m~ .o.~HImx_h.u~ Na m430m zmohmm m43om o.~m- + .o.oHImt_h.*.oHN u Q4ao “a «430m NH.-.- .o.-Imz_h0u_ od m43om zmzpmm ¢43om m.me + .o.0Iwz_h0*w.mnm u o4ao o m43om o~.o.o .o.o~Iwz_h.u~ m «430m zmohwm x43om QILN + .o.mImz_h0#N.mm~ u Q4mo h m430m m.~.h .0.0I030h010 o a430m zmopwm m430m .o.¢Iwz_h.*o.HN u Q4¢o m «430m o.m.m .o.mez~h.uH 4 «430m zxohwm m43ow oo.o u o4mo m «430m ¢.m.m .o.¢Imz_h.u_ N «430m zmahmm a430m ..x4m00ma 02—3340 0» oz_zm3hmm .omwooam «430mm #240 .mmaor ommN 24:» mmw3 mz_p .4m430m .m:m***zoo .o:~0p4xm0¢ om a43om .Om.»30_.mh_m3 H «430m ~.N.~ .m10h.m_ «430m m u #:0— m430m o.¢N*mx0h u 05—h m430m......................wm301 oh hmw>zou 0m .m>4o z_ wz_h 20 oz~o4wmIIIII0 m430m 0 «430m ..mmoor. mt—h m0 p4rh Immoor z_ m¢4IIIII0 «430m m»_23 mz_h ml» ..>4oIN**10\3400 Q4mo m3m4~m4> wrp >m awPZwmmzawmIllllu m430m m0 mp4m zo_h4_o4m m43om wrp .monIQ4 .meQLx .10ga muzwmmumaIIIIIo x43om Aw wzoo fig 20 m34>¢whz~ «30: m #4 uzum243 hm4m 20 zmx4~ 4h4oIIIII0 a43om 200p4~o4m «430m mrp do zo_p43oa¢mhz_ 1402—3 4 m. wz—poommom m~IPIIIII0 a430m ****»*4m430m wzuh30amow******mw >4: ad x4>oz .h.3IIIII0 «430m 0 «430m .04xo.wz-0 4m430m wZ—pDOmmam uncapfivaoo 197 198 mm #m cm mm 4m mm Nm Hm 0m 04 m4 #4 04 m4 44 m4 N4 H4 04 om mm #m 0430m «430m ~430m “430m 0430m 0430m 0430m 0430m 0430m 0430m 0430m 0430m 0430m 0430m 0430m 0430m 0430m 0430m 0430m 0430m 0430m 0430m #240 .o2400000 02~3340 0# 02~Z03#m0 .0030: 4N Z4I# 0w#4m00 mz~# .40430m 020 203#w0 .0000000N .m:m***roo .ord.#42000 .dm.#:o_.m#_0z 203#w0 00.0 0400 bNamN.mN .0.¢NIm:_#0mH 203#w0 4.0m + .0.0NImz_#0*¢.bNI 4N.MN.MN .0.~NImt~#00~ 0.00u + .oooHIwZ~#0*oomm~I NN.~N.~N .0.0lez—#.¢~ 203#w0 ¢.0m- + .0.m~lw£—#.*oo#0ml 0N.o~.o~ .ooodlwz—#00_ 203#00 moNMON + .0.m~lw£~#.*~.~mdl m~.#~.#~ .0.m~lmt~#0u_ Z03#m0 0oNoo~ + .0.N~th_#.*0o0¢ 203#m0 0400 0400 0400 0400 0400 fin 0N mN 4N MN NN ~N 0N mg mg #0 om ma 199 HNM¢M~ON®OOHNM¢m~ON®OOHNm¢lfi~0 FIHHH—IP-I—IHHNNNNNNNNNNMMMMMMM HNMQ‘U‘OI‘CDO‘O a-I 2#024 200#m0 2#024 0.00 n # m0 2#024 4L.m~.m~ .0.03I02_#000 NH 2#m24 200#w0 2#024 .o.o~Imz_#.*LOIm¢mmmm.o + m.mm u # La 2#024 NH.H~.~H .o.mHI02_#00_ ofi 2#m24 20:#w0 2#024 .o.>Im2_#.*#ooo.~ + 4.40 n # o 2#m24 03.0.0 .o.o~Imx_#00~ m 2#024 200#m0 2#024 .o.¢Iwz_#.*HOIw¢mmmmIm + m.- u # # 2#024 m.>.# .o.>I02_#.00 o 2#m24 200#w0 2#024 .0.~I02_#.*30Im>booo.m I o.m~ n # m 2#m24 o.m.m lo.¢Im2_#.0_ 4 2#m24 200#00 2#024 02_#*¢mmm.w I 4mm~.o~ u # m 2#024 ¢.m.m .o.HImx_#.0_ N 2#m24 200#w0 2#024 2.2400000 02_3340 0# 020200#m0 .000000N 2#m240 #240 .m0301 00m~ 24z# mmw3 02~# .:m#024 .m:m***rom .oIH.#42000 0m 2#m24 .om.#00~.w#_03 d 2#024 N.N.~ .02_#.0_ 2#024 m u #00— 2#m24 oo¢~*m2~# u 02_# 2#024......................m0001 0# #0w>200 0m .m>4o 20 020# z_ 0200400IIIII0 2#024 2#024 .m0002 00 m#_23 zHIIIIIQ 2#m24 m0 020# .004000#200 .000 00 m#_zo 2. m0 .#0 w0:#400020# #Zm_mz4IIIII0 2#024 m0:#400020# 0330 >00 01# .~>o~ 0203 000 4#40 340_0030#42_30IIIII0 2#024 34003 00002200 00 .#anIm.3 .000 .~# 0203 "a 20 m34>0m#z_IIIII0 2#024 000: 0001# #4 20.#4#m 001#401 #000004 020m243 m:# #4 wa4# 4#40IIIII0 2#m24 .0002m# 03:0 >00 02# 00 20_#43000w#z_ 0402—3 4 m_ mz_#000mam m_r#IIIII0 2#024 ******2w#024 wz~#000mow******N# >42 o0 x4>0z .#.3IIIII0 2#024 2#m24 2#.m20#. 20#024 mz~#000m:m 200 0m 04 04 #4 04 04 44 m4 N4 H4 04 om mm #m 2#024 2#024 2#024 2#024 2#024 2#024 2#024 2#024 2#024 2#024 2#024 2#024 2#024 2#024 #240 020 203#w0 ..2400000 0203340 0# 02~203#w0 90000000N .m0301 4N 24I# 0w#4m00 02_# .tw#024 o03mfifiuxoo .01~0#42000 2~m.#30~0w#_03 Z03#00 .ooNNIw2_#0*4MMNoN I bo0N u # 0N.0~.0~ .0.4NI02~#00_ Z03#m0 20o0~I02—#0*#ooco4o~ I oomN u # 0H.#~.#H .0.NNI02~#00~ Z03#w0 .0.0~I02~#0*~0Iw#00000m I ~¢0N u # odpma.mfi .0.o~lwz_#00~ am 0N ad 0d ha 00 md 4H J 201 HNm4m~OI~0®OHNM4m~OI~®O~OHNm4m~o HH—I—IH—IH—IHNNNNNNNNNNmmmmmmm HNMQ’MCN‘DO‘O ,4 02024 203#00 02024 .o.m~I02~#.*4OI0#on40.0 + mN04N#00.o u 43x 03 02024 40.00.00 .0.00I02_#30_ N0 02024 20:#00 02024 .0.00I020#0*4OI000004#.0 + 000N0030.o u 43x NH 02024 N3.~3.- loom~I02~#.00 00 02024 203#00 02024 20.#I02_#.»00I0#Om~0om.H + 0#omm-o.o u 43x 0 02024 03.0.0 .o.oHI02_#.0~ 0 02024 203#00 02024 20.4I02~#.*40I00NNN.4 + 4ooo3o.o u 41x # 02024 0.#.# 20.#I02_#.0_ 0 02024 203#00 02024 .o.~I02_#3*4oI0oo~.~ + o~>ooo.o u 43x 0 02024 0.0.0 20.4I02_#.0~ 4 02024 203#00 02024 00030.0 + .02_#.*00I04om.mI u 43x 0 02024 4.0.0 20.3I02_#00~ N 02024 203#00 02024 ..2400000 02_3340 0# 020203#00 .000000N 020240 #240 .0030: 000N 24:# 0003 02~# .302024 .03m#**zom .01~0#42000 00 02024 .0m.#30~00#_03 3 02024 N.N.~ .02_#.0_ 02024 m u #300 02024 0.4N*020# n 020# 02024......................m0001 0# #00>200 00 .m>40 20 02_# 20 0200400IIIII0 02024 02024 00302 20 00 02_# 024 .0003200020200IIIII0 02024 .43x. 20_#0400 0302 #200024 02# “#03 0233 000 4#40IIIII0 02024 34000030#42_30 34003 00002200 00 .#000.m.3 .000 .~# 0203 ~3 02024 20 034>00#z_ 0:02 0002# #4 Z0x4# 4#40 001#403 #0000—4 0200243IIIII0 02024 01# 2000 00#4330340 m4 00020002#4 01# 20 00#4x 00 20_#0400 0302IIIII0 02024 #200024 02# 00 20~#430000#z_ 0402—3 4 4 m0 0z_#300000 m_r#IIIII0 02024 ******302024 0z_#3000:w*****»N# >42 03 x4>02 .#.3IIIII0 02024 02024 243x.020#0302024 020#300030 IIIIIo 202 0m 04 04 #4 04 m4 44 m4 N4 a4 04 0m mm #m 02024 02024 02024 02024 02024 02024 02024 02024 02024 02024 02024 02024 02024 02024 #240 020 Z03#00 2.2400000 0203340 0# 02~Z03#00 .m0302 4N Z4I# 00#4000 02~# .302024 o03m***100 .OIHO#42000 .nm.#30_00#_03 Z03#00 .0.NNI02~#.*M0I000400#.~ I 04mm4momaooo u 42x 0N.o~.o~ .0.4NI02~#00~ 203#00 20.00I02—#0*MOI00m00mmo~ I #4N000~0.0 u 41x 0~.#~.#~ .0.NNI02—#00~ Z03#00 .0.0~I02~#0*m0I0#¢0#0.0 I m0~000~0.0 u 42x o~.m~.m~ .0.0~I02—#.m~ .000000QN Hm 0N 0H 00 #~ 0‘ mg 40 203 HNM~TID~OI~mOOHNM¢mOF®OOHNM¢m~O H'd—‘F‘v-Iv-IFIMHNNNNNNNNNNMMMMMMM I-INm‘TLnOI‘CDO‘O p4 m0203 m02~3 m02~3 m02~3 m02~3 m0zmz 00203 00203 m02—3 m02~3 m02~3 mozuz m02~3 m0z~z m02~3 m02~3 m02~3 m02~3 m02~3 m0Z~3 m02~3 002030 #240 0~.m~.m~ .0.NNI02~#00_ 4d 203#00 .0.00I02—#0*~0I04mmmm0.# I 0.03 n dm> Md 4~.m~.m~ .0.0~I02~#00~ NH Z03#00 .0.0~I02—#0*~0I04mmmm0.# + m.0~ u dm> ad N~.H~.- .0.0~I02—#00_ 0H Z03#00 .0.#I02~#0*4mmmm~.u + 0.0 u Qm> o 0H.o.o .0.0~I02~#00_ 0 Z03#00 .0.4I02~#.#4mmmm~.~ I m.0~ u 00> # 0.#.# .0.#I02~#00_ o Z03#00 .0.~I02_#0*~0I0#0000.m + N.o u 00> m o.m.m .0.4I02_#.0~ 4 Z03#00 .02—#.*m~.~ + 00.0 n dm> m 4.m.m .0.~I02_#00~ N 203#00 .000000N .dm02~z .03m***100 .OI~0#42000 0m 2.2400000 02—3340 0# 02H203#00 .m0301 000N 24I# mm03 02—# 00203 .om.#00~.0#_03 3 00203 N.N.3 .02_#.0~ 0023: m n #300 00203 0.4N*02~# u 02~# 00203......................m0:02 0# #00>200 00 .m>40 23 02_# 20 0200400IIIII0 00203 0 0020: 00002 00 m#320 20 00 02_# .0002\m03_2 00 m#_zaIIIII0 00203 .041 2003. 00000 0203 02# .~#od 02:3 000 4#40 340_0030#42_30IIIII0 00233 34003 00002200 00 .#00o.m.: .000 .~# 0204 #3 20 m34>00#z.IIIII0 00203 0:02 0002# #4 20~#4#0 00I#40z #000004 02.0243 02# #4 20x4# 4#40IIIII0 00203 00000 0203 02# 00 20_#430000#z_ 0402—3 4 m0 0z_#000000 m_r#IIIII0 00203 **»»**amoz_z 0z~#0000:m****«*N# >42 00 x4>02 .#.3IIIII0 00203 0 00203 .0m>.02_#. 0002—3 0z_#000000 204 04 m4 44 m4 N4 a4 04 am mm #m 002—3 m02~3 m0Z~3 m02~3 00203 00203 m02~3 00203 w02~3 002~3 .0000000N .OIH.#42000 .um.#30~00#_03 ..2400000 0203340 0# 020203#00 .0030: 4N Z4I# 00#4000 02—# .0002—3 .03m***100 .0.NNI02~#.#000~.H + m#.m 0~.#~.#~ .0.4NI02_#00~ .0.0nl02~#0*00.N I mo.N~ 00 0a #d 00 mg "111111114111"11W“