3 1293 000819320 ; , ~ 3 ll'c’lelllllllllllllllll This is to certify that the thesis entitled INFLUENCE OF AMMONIA TREATMENT AND TIME ENSILING ON PROTEOLYSIS AND FEEDING VALUE OF CORN SILAGE FOR DAIRY CATTLE presented by Colin O.L.E. Johnson has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for Masters degreein Animal Science My [KW /é M /7f/ / Date 0-7639 RETURNING MATERIALS: IV1£31_] Place in book drop to LIBRARIES ‘ remove this checkout from 4...!,...._ your record. FINES will be charged if book is returned after the date stamped below. gr?! 1 r $ 1’" a» U j} .l. INFLUENCE OF AMMONIA TREATMENT AND TIME OF ENSILING ON PROTEOLYSIS AND FEEDING VALUE OF CORN SILAGE FOR DAIRY CATTLE By Colin O.L.E. Johnson A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Animal Science 1981 ll 1’ '.' I ’ x... / .x z « ABSTRACT INFLUENCE OF AMMONIA TREATMENT AND TIME OF ENSILING ON PROTEOLYSIS AND FEEDING VALUE OF CORN SILAGE FOR DAIRY CATTLE By Colin O.L.E. Johnson Whole-chopped corn plants (32-3496 DM) were treated with O, .25, .52, or 1.08% added N as ammonia. About 3 kg of material were placed in 5 mil polythene bags which were then evacuated and served as experimental silos. Silage samples were taken on days 0, l, 2, 6, 12 and 51+ and analyzed for dry matter, PH, lactic acid, total and water insoluble nitrogen, and free amino acids in the water phase. Added ammonia increased initial pH of silages, but delayed increases in lactic acid. Increasing levels of ammonia decreased proteolysis. Large increases in alanine were observed in the water phase of high ammonia-treated silages, increases which were apparently not related to proteolytic effects (Experiment 1). In Experiment 2, 2# lactating cows were utilized to determine the relative feeding value of corn silages treated with Cold-flo (.3696 NH 82% N) or Pro-Sil 3’ (2.4% ammonium solution, 13.6% N). Dry matter and lactic acid were higher for the Pro-Sil treated silage. Apart from a slightly higher intake of NPN by the Pro- Sil group, milk yields, intakes, and body weight changes were similar for both groups. DEDICATION To the memory of my beloved mother. Edna W. Johnson. 1922-1980. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my sincere appreciation to Dr. J. T. Huber, my major Professor, for accepting me as one of his graduate students and providing me with invaluable assistance and guidance throughout my graduate studies. Also. special thanks are due to the members of my committee. Dr. W. G. Bergen and Dr. D. Hillman. for their patience and understanding of my cause. My thanks also go to all those who aided the cause. par- ticularly the Department of Dairy Science for financial assistance during the course of my graduate studies. Special thanks also go to the Dairy Nutrition Secretary. Elaine Kibbey, for her generous help throughout the graduate program. Finally. I must thank my loving and devoted wife. Paulette, not only for her remarkable ability to turn none- too-legible manuscript into beautiful typescript. but also for her encouragement and patience throughout the graduate study period. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES . . . . . . . . . . INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . LITERATURE REVIEW . . . . . . . . . Brief History of Ensiling . Silage Fermentation . . . Carbohydrate Fermentation . Protein Degradation . . . . Non-Protein-Nitrogen Treatment of Corn Silages . . . . . . . . . Effect of Ammonia Addition on Silage Fermentation . . . . . . . . Feeding Trials . . . . . . . . MATERIALS AND METHODS . . . . . . . Experiment 1. Silage Fermentation Study Experiment 2. Feeding Trial . . . . RESULTS AND DISCUSSION . . . . . . . Experiment 1. . . . . . . . . . Experiment 2. . . . . . . . . . SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . iv Page Cantu m H N 1 15 19 19 22 2# 2h as 50 53 LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 1. Summary of dairy cow performance on corn silage treated with ammonia at ensiling . . . . 17 2. Silage parameters under investigation . . . 20 3. Analysis of Variance for Split-Plot Analysis............ 21 h. Ration composition of eXperimental diets. . . 23 5. Effect of ammonia concentration and time of ensiling on 5 dry matter in corn silage . . 25 6. Effect of ammonia concentration and time of ensiling on pH in corn silage . . . . . 27 7. Effect of ammonia concentration and time of ensiling on lactic acid in corn silage . . 28 8. Effect of ammonia concentration and time of ensiling on total nitrogen in corn silage . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 9. Effect of ammonia concentration and time of ensiling on water insoluble nitrogen in corn Silage o o o o o o o o o o o 32 10. Effect of ammonia concentration and time of ensiling on water soluble nitrogen in corn Silage o o e o o o o o o o o 33 11.1 Effect of ammonia concentration and time of ensiling on free amino acids in corn silage water phase . . . . . . . . . 36 11.1 Continued 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o 37 11.1 continu3d o o o o e o o o o o o o o 38 TABLE PAGE 11.2 Effect of ammonia concentration and time of ensiling on free amino acids in corn silage water phase . . . . . . . . #0 11.3 Main effect means, standard errors, and significant differences for free amino acids in corn silage water phase . . . #1 11.4 Effect of ammonia addition and time of ensil- ing on free amino acid N in corn silage water phase . . . . . . . . . . 43 11.5 Effect of ammonia addition and time of ensiling on total free amino acid N in corn silage water phase . . . . . . on 12. Dry matter. pH, lactic acid and crude protein of corn silage composites . . . #6 13. Influence of non protein nitrogen source on dry matter and protein intakes of dairy #6 cows 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 1h. Influence of non protein nitrogen source on milk yield: of dairy cows . . . . . 48 15. Influence of non protein nitrogen source on milk composition, weight change and feed . efficiency of dairy cows . . . . . #8 vi Introduction It is widely accepted that normal corn silage that is well eared and preserved is a high-energy source of forage for cattle, sheep and other ruminants. In addition, it has the potential of substantially reducing feed costs and in- creasing beef and milk production per acre of crops fed. However, these advantages are partially offset by an insuf- ficiency of protein. a factor which appears to limit volun- tary intake. Moreover, degradation of protein (or proteoly- sis) in the resultant silage may influence the quantity of protein (as Opposed to NPN) which is absorbed and available for metabolism in the animal's body.' In addition to ammonia treatment being the preferred method for making up the protein deficit in corn silage, ammonia treatment of the whole chapped corn plant at ensiling has consistently resulted in increased insoluble nitrogen (Henderson and Bergen. 1972; Huber gt §;.. 1973) and possibly decreased proteolysis of plant protein in the resultant silage (Huber gt al.. 1979c). The importance of reduced proteolysis during ensiling cannot be overemphasized, since reduced degradation of protein to NPN may increase the supply of undegraded plant protein to the abomasum and intestines, and this may enhance intake (Egan and Meir, 1965). The forms of ammonia most available for silage treatment are Cold-flo (concentrated anhydrous, 82% nitrogen) and Pro- Sil ( an ammonium solution containing 13.6% nitrogen). Earlier studies showed depressed intakes in dairy and beef cattle fed silage treated with concentrated anhydrous ammonia com- pared to silage treated with more dilute solutions. More studies with Cold-flo and ammonia solutions have not directly compared the forms of treatment in lactating cows. Many dairymen contemplating ammonia treatment question the relative value of the different forms of ammonia, but little infor- mation is available. Therefore, the objective of this study were two-fold: 1. To characterize the nature of the protein breakdown in corn silage ensiled with or without ammonia. 2. To determine the relative feeding value of corn silage treated with two forms of ammonia (Cold-flo vs. Pro-Sil). Literature Review Brief History of Ensiling The process of ensiling is old and has been intensively studied during the last century (Watson and Nash, 1960). The object of storing green craps as silage is to preserve the material with a minimum loss of nutrients. Various ensiling practices have been used to achieve this end. In 18h3, Johnston recommended a German method for harvesting and storing green fodder: the direct cut material was packed into trenches which were then covered with boards and earth to facilitate the exclusion cf air. Also. as pointed out by Jenkins, 188“, the practice of storing grain in pits or under- ground trenches dates back to the Greeks and Egyptians. Goffart's work in France had an important influence on the popularization of the practice in the late 19th century. He recognized the rapidity with which crop maize ferments within the silo. He also stressed the importance of reducing the length of chop so as to facilitate better packing and exclusion of air from the silage mass. Miles (1918) gave Reihlen, a German, credit for being the first to preserve the whole corn plant utilizing a silo. Corn silage is a basic ingredient in both dairy and beef cattle rations in many regions of North America and Europe. Corn harvested for silage in North America has increased from #7.? million tons in 195h (Waldo and Jorgensen. 1981) to 111.1 million tons in 1980 (U.S. D.A., 1981). Although the 3 ensiling of forage maize as a winter feed for livestock has been practiced in Europe for at least 100 years (Wilkinson, 1978) the quantity of maize harvested for silage remained low during the first fifty years of the this century due to inadequate harvesting machinary. The introduction of the forage harvester into Europe during the 1960's revolutionized the technology of the harvesting and ensiling operation (Wilkinson. 1978). The current energy crisis and world food shortage with the resulting emphasis on animal production from forage has created the proper climate for reevaluating silage production. Si gge Fermegtation Once a producer has grown a good, high-yielding crop, his next objective is to preserve the crap for livestock feeding. As Barnett (195A) pointed out, the aim of silage making is ”to achieve within the ensiled mass sufficient concentration of lactic acid, produced as a result of the presence of microorganisms within the cut crap, to inhibit other forms of microbial activity and thus preserve the material until such time as it is required". Research has conclusively shown that the process of ensiling green crops is the most effective and efficient method of storing and preserving the nutritive value of the whole corn plant. How- ever, it must be borne in mind, that the feeding value of silage is largely affected by microbiological, chemical. and physical factors. The ensiling process is not 100% efficient and energy losses during the process in the form of heat and carbon dioxide evolution can be extensive. There- fore, it becomes extremely important to understand the silage fermentation process in order to consistently produce high quality silage. Although there is no clear-cut division for the various phases of the fermentation process, Barnett (1954) originally desribed the process as consisting basically of four phases and possibly a fifth phase depending on the course of fermen- tation. These phases are: Phase 1. Plant cells continue to respire, utilizing available intermediary metabolites and simple sugars, result- ing in the production of 002 and heat. Phase 2. A relatively short phase of acetic acid production by coliform bacteria (and others). Phase 3. The conversion of soluble carbohydrates to lactic acid by lactobacilli and streptococci, with most silages reaching this stage two to three days after filling. Phase 4. Stage of quiescence of silage mass. In the absence of buffer additions, lactic acid production contin- ues and reaches a peak at 1 to 3 percent of the fresh weight for corn silage. The pH of the ensiled material declines to below 4.0 when the lactic acid producing bacteria cease fermentative activity. The ensiled material, if undistured, is now quite stable for prolonged storage. Phase 5. Proliferation of butyric acid producers. This normally occurs in silages where the acidity is not high enough to prevent the conversion of residual carbohydrates and lactic acid to butyric acid by clostridial bacteria. Ammonia from deamination of protein, carbon dioxide and heat often accompany this phase, particularly when air is introduced into the silo mass (Huber, 1979a). As mentioned before, losses due to the ensiling process can be very extensive, and a large share of these losses can be attributed to the action of plant and microbial cell respira- tion (Barnett, 1954; Kempton, 1958; Watson and Nash, 1960). When the plant material is ensiled, the living cells continue to reSpire until all the oxygen is used up. The production of lactic acid is an anaerobic process, and therefore it is essential that anearobic conditions become established as soon as possible within the ensiled mass. Previous research has shown that delays in establishing anaerobic conditions can be detrimental to the silage fermentation (Miller 23 gl.. 1961; Langston gt a;., 1962: Ohyama gt g;., 1970). Obligate anaerobes. such as clostridia and yeasts have been known to compete with facultative lactic acid microbes for available water soluble carbohydrates under aerobic conditions (Takahashi. 1970). Utilizing sterilized corn inoculated with bacteria.to make silage, Peterson gt gl..(1925), demonstrated that plant cell respiration was nonessential and that bacteria are mainly reSponsible for the production of acids from sugar and starches. Two major compositional changes occur in the corn plant during ensiling: namely, the conversion of water-soluble carbohydrates to short-chain organic acids and the degrada- tion of plant protein to non-protein nitrogenous compounds (Johnson.gt,gl., 1967, Demarquilly and Andrieu, 1973; Bergen 23 g;.. 1974). ' Carbohydrate Fermentation In silage making. the green chop is preserved by lactic acid formed in the fermentation process. The production of lactic acid requires comparatively large amounts of ferment- able carbohydrates in the ensiled material. Thus, the amount of fermentable carbohydrates in the green chop becomes of prime importance in producing the desired type of fermenta- tion (Melvin, 1965, 0hyama.gt gl., 1973; Ohyama and Masaki, 1974). The carbohydrates available for fermentation are primarily those within the water soluble carbohydrate frac- tion (Zimmer, 1971). It is generally accepted that as the corn plant matures. soluble carbohydrates contained in the leaves and stems are converted to insoluble starch in the kernels: thus, the total level of soluble carbohydrates decreases, and in turn reduces fermentation as well as the level of lactic acid produced. However, McCullough (1973) summarized the soluble carbohydrate content of nine creps (including maize), and reported that under most ensiling conditions, the crops contained a suffi- cient amount of available carbohydrate (about 6 to 8% of the dry matter content). Ensiling the whole maize plant at 30 to 35% of dry matter has also been shown to supply adequate sol- uble carbohydrates for fermentation (Hillman, 1977). Prolonged cell respiration under aerobic conditions can significantly decrease the quantity of available carbohy- drates remaining for the anaerobic fermentation phase (Zimmer, 1971: McCllough, 1973). However, the soluble carbohydrates surviving aerobic metabolism are fermentable by a variety of micro-organisms, of which lactic acid bacteria are the most important (Whittenbury 23 g;., 1967). Since the desired fermentation is a rapid production of lactic acid, the desired changes would be a low pH with a minimum loss of carbohydrates. Johnson 33 gl., (1966) reported decreases in corn plant soluble carbohydrate ranging from 39 to 83%, and concurrent conversion to lactic acid. Both lactic and acetic acids contribute towards avoiding undesirable fermentations. However. lactic acid is the more important, it being present in larger amounts than acetic acid and exerting a greater effect on pH (Greenhill, 1964). In summary, the most striking feature of carbohydrate fermentation is the production of organic acids of which lactic acid is the most important. Although there are many factors that can influence the extent of lactic acid produc- tion, the chief determining factor will be the amount of water soluble carbohydrates available for fermentation. Protein Degradation The degradation of plant protein to non-protein nitrogenous compounds during ensiling has long been a subject of discussion. It is noteworthy that even in well-preserved silages about 50% net breakdown of the protein may take place (McDonald and Whittenbury. 1973). Various factors have been known to affect the course and extent of the breakdown. Some of those implicated are. dry matter or moisture content of the crap at the time of ensiling, pH of the silage mass, lactic acid content. level of oxygen. temperature, and most of all enzymatic activity. The importance of dry matter content of the whole plant material at the time of ensiling cannot be overemphasized. it being the most decisive factor influencing the extent of protein degradation (Bergen 23 g;., 1974). Geasler (1970). working with corn silage material, found that material ensiled at 48 and 60% dry matter contained 30 and 26% of total nitrogen in water soluble form. reSpectively. A similar phenomenon was observed by Bergen gt g;.. (1974) using corn silage material ranging from 32 to 85% dry matter. and by Hawkins (1969) using alfalfa silage material. Immature silage (low dry matter) tend to be higher in protein content, but a larger portion is degraded to non-protein nitrogen during fermentation (Hillman and Fox. 1977). According to Andrieu and Demarquilly (1974), protein degradation is inversely related to the dry matter content at ensiling. The pH value is the most universal measure used in assessing silage quality. In general, pH values associated with well-preserved silages are between the ranges of 3.8 to 10 4.2 (Greenhill. 1964; Bergen. 1980). while that of poor quality silages are above 4.2 (Greenhill. 1964). McCullough (1961), is of the opinion that the high pH usually associated with undesirable silage fermentation is a result of the apparent protein breakdown with the resulting effect of increased buffering capacity. Later. McDonald and Henderson (1962) suggested that the contribution from the protein fraction resulted from protein degradation to decarboxylated amino acid bases. De Vuyst gt gl.. (1971) have made a comprehensive study of the changes in amino acid composition of grass and alfalfa during ensilage. They found that in silages ranging in pH from 4.9 to 5.7. considerable degrada- tion of amino acids occurred. eSpecially the basic amino acids (lysine. histidine and arginine). In the same experi- ment, these workers also observed that the amount of alanine almost doubled in some silages. Hughes (1971) in a study of high pH silages observed a decline in amino acid nitrogen with a concomitant increase in volatile nitrogen which was mostly ammonia. The preservation of plant material as silage is depend- ent on the accumulation of lactic acid and a correSponding decrease in pH. However. even if a rapid drOp in pH is achieved and the growth of proteolytic bacteria is inhibited. some ammonia is still formed in the silo (Mo and Fyrileiv. 1979). Some lactic acid producing bacteria are also capable of both deaminating and decarboxylating amino acids (Whittenbury gt g;.. 1967). Brady(1966) isolated lactic 11 acid bacteria from farm silages and showed that Lactobacil- lus plantarum and Pediococcus gp. deaminated serine to pyruvate and arginine to ornithine. Ammonia nitrogen levels in high lactate silages are frequently of the order of less than 10% of total nitrogen (McDonald and Edwards, 1976). In addition to deterioration of silage during the utilization period, high amounts of oxygen during ensiling have been shown to result in the formation of large quanti- ties of volatile nitrogen from the deamination of amino acids (Ruxton and McDonald, 1974). Temperature is one of the factors affecting the success of silage making. since the lactic acid bacteria have an optimum temperature for growth. However. according to Nilsson 33 §;.. (1956), the Optimum temperature of 80 to 100°F for lactic acid producing bacteria is also within the tempera- ture range of proteolytic bacteria. Thus, it was not surprising when Wieringa, (1960) reported that the ammonia fraction in silages stored at 68°F was almost as high as at 95°F. Nilsson.gt,gl.. (1956) further stressed that tempera- ture becomes an important factor in silage fermentation when the crop is of high-protein and low-sugar content. Both plant and microbial enzymes have also been impli- cated as affecting the course and extent of protein degrada- tion during the ensiling process. The general consensus is that protein degradation is a two phase process; the first involving the rapid breakdown of plant protein into peptides and amino acids, primarily by endogenous plant proteases 12 (Barnett, 1954; Kemble. 1956: Watson and Nash, 1960: McDonald and Whittenbury, 1973: Bergen g3,gl.. 1974), and the second involving the subsequent degradation of amino acids to volatile nitrogen and other nitrogenous compounds by clostridial activity (McDonald and Whittenbury, 1973; Oshima and McDonald, 1978). Non-Protein-Nitrogen Treatment of Corn Silgges In periods of high cost of oilseed meals. simple nitrogen-containing substances such as urea. ammonia or ammonium salts are added to cattle rations to replace plant protein supplements. These compounds are referred to as a group as non-protein nitrogen (NPN). The notable advantages of corn silage are partially off- set by its well known nutritional insufficiency with reSpect to protein. Nevertheless. being high in energy and organic acids, fermented silage make an ideal carrier of NPN in ruminant rations. Urea has traditionally been the most widely utilized from of NPN for treating silages. However. since anhydrous ammonia is a cheaper source of NPN. researchers became interested in its application to corn silage at ensiling. This program was initiated at the Michigan State University in the years 1967 and 1968. Evolving from the original use of anhydrous ammonia mixed with water (aqueous ammonia) were aqua ammonia (21-23%N), ammonia-molasses mineral-solution (now bearing the trade name Pro-Sil) and Cold-flo ammonia. These three sources of ammonia have been hound to give results superior to urea, and allow for higher 13 intakes of NPN without decreasing milk production (Huber gt g;.. 1980). This section of the paper will consider data available on the effects of using ammonia as an additive to the chopped corn plant material at ensiling. and subsequent effects in feeding trials. Effectg of Ammonia Addition on Silage Fermentation Although ammonia is added principally as a nutritive supplement to furnish crude protein to cattle. it also exerts a profound effect on silage fermentation. It was noted earlier. that under natural ensiling conditions energy losses in the form of heat and carbon dioxide evolution can be extensive. Treating the chopped corn plant at ensiling with ammonia has shown to reduce such losses when compared to the untreated material (Juengst gt gt.. 1975: Huber gt g;., 1979b). Juengst gt g;.. (1975) reported that the untreated silage produced more carbon dioxide during the first 24 hours than the ammonia (Pro-Sil) treated silage produced during the entire 11 days of fermentation. Initial increases in pH and higher lactic acid concen- trations have also been reported for ammonia-treated corn silages (Cash 1972: Henderson and Bergen 1972; Huber gt g;.. 1973: Juengst gt g;.. 1975). This phenomenon has been attributed to the increased buffering capacity resulting from ammonia treatment. thus enabling the lactic acid- producing bacteria to survive longer (Britt and Huber. 1975). However, this phenomenon has not been found to be operative 14 at all levels of ammonia additions. Levels of ammonia addition above 1% of silage dry matter have been found to decrease lactic acid production (Huber gt g;.. 1979), and total inhibition is achieved at 2.5% of the dry matter (Britt and Huber. 1975). Also worthy of note. is the increased water insoluble nitrogen concentrations resulting from ammonia treatment (Henderson and Bergen. 1972: Huber gt g;.. 1973). Bergen gt g;.. (1974). suggested that this increased water insoluble nitrogen fraction might be related to decreased proteolysis of the original plant protein. More recent studies (Huber gt g;.. 1979c. 1980a) revealed that 40% of the added ammonia was recovered as ammonia in the water insoluble nitrogen fraction in unfermented silage. In the fermented silage. 28% of the added ammonia was recovered in the insoluble nitrogen fraction. as revealed by 15N analyses (Huber gt g;.. 1979c): this accounted for only 59% of the total increase in the insoluble nitrogen fraction. The remainder was presumably due to decresed breakdown of original plant protein as suggested by Bergen gt g;.. (1974). Apart from its influence on the silage fermentation process, ammonia treated silages have also been shown to be more stable during the utilization period (Britt and Huber. 1975: Soper and Owen. 1977; Buchanan-Smith. 1980). Britt (1973). has attributed this increased stability to the antifungal action of ammonia and ammonium salts. 15 Feedigg Trials The ability of the ruminant to utilize NPN as a partial replacement for the preformed protein in the ration is well documented. However. it must be borne in mind that with increasing levels of dietary nitrogen, rumen ammonia increases more rapidly with NPN than with natural protein (National Research Council, 1976). The ammonia nitrogen released from NPN compounds as the result of rumen microbial enzyme action may be utilized in the synthesis of microbial protein (Reid, 1953), but the extent to which this can be done will depend on the energy concentration in the ration (Satter and Roffler 1975: Chalupa. 1978). A deficiency in intake of metabolize energy may result in decreased animal performance (Wilkinson. 1978). However. as pointed out by Huber and Hung (1981). inclusion of NPN‘in dairy cattle rations is profitable as long as production is not diminished and utilization for microbial protein synthesis is assured. For the past 13 years, several investigations have been made by workers at the Michigan State University to determine the relative feeding value of corn silage treated with the various forms of nitrogen-containing compounds at ensiling. Many of the studies have revealed that milk production (Huber and Santana, 1972; Huber et al., 1973; Boman, 1980; Huber gt g;.. 1980b) and body weight gains (Henderson and Bergen. 1972: Cook and Fox. 1976) in cattle fed silages treated with ammonia solutions prior to ensiling. were comparable or higher than those fed untreated or urea-treated 16 silages. Other workers (Honig and Zimmer. 1975: Buchanan- Smith, 1980) have reported similar results in beef cattle studies. However. a closer look at the relative feeding value. particularly in dairy cows. of corn silage treated at ensiling with the different forms of anhydrous ammonia (gaseous. aqueous, and ammonia-molasses-mineral solution) reveals that the apparent differences are within the realm of experimental error. A look at the summary in Table 1. of some data on dairy cow performance on ammonia treated corn silage will tend to support this view. Nevertheless. the data in Table 1 reveals that the forms of ammonia can be safely added at ensiling to corn silages varying in dry matter content from 30 to 42% without depressing milk yields; ammonia (Pro-Sil) addition to 53% dry matter depressed milk yields as shown in experiment 2 on Table 1. Urea addition to high dry matter silages (above 42%) have consistently resulted in lower milk yields of lactating dairy cows than addition to lower dry matter silages (Huber gt g;.. 1968: Van Horn gt g;.. 1968). Also worthy of note in Table 1, experiment 3, is the significant (P<,05) depression in intake of dry matter with the more concentrated ammonia (gaseous NH3 - 82%N). According to the reported literature. silage protein was lower for the gaseous ammonia than for the Pro-Sil treatment (12.1 vs. 14.2% of dry matter). but the total dietary protein for the gaseous ammonia treatment was 13.9% which 17 .oo .so .cN .w: .m .a .so msoa .Noc: Nm.m .mmmwsooe NN.mm .Amzz mac 2 Ne.MN waoeamocou monoxae < .naNmN use MNmN ..Ns no page: "mucmcmcam .z Nam uoawmu:00s .H mom .2 NNN emcoaoeocm m~.H oq.~ mo.H m.mm q.o~ o.q~ o.q ¢.Nm NN.H oq.m om.H ~.m Poomoumou mosas> amaopmmtm om.om mN.Nm s«.~m N~.~m om.mm mm.mm oases sac om.Nm mn.on ms.Nm s~.mm oo.~m ~m.~m mm.~m mo.” om.Nm Nw.om aa.am mo.mm o~.~m ~m.mm m .N« mm.o om.am m¢.om ms.on mo.~m m:.~m om.fim om.~m mm.o eacoes< nam.am ma.m~ No.0m mo.Nm N~.Nm mm.~m om.mn o Hoopeoo I so m some on NH 0 m m I o mmz mm psoSpmomm NMQMAAMQMIHMINHMHWH z oooo< psoSPMowm shoe :N Novena hum R :o ommHNm wcaaamso mo mafia use sowpmppcoocoo macossm mo voommm .m mnmm vsommuama mooam> nuances u Dove’s-I easel sma.s ewa.= omm.: mm.o oN.N so.s scams sac am.m ow.e mm.: mm.m mm.m ma.m mm.m mo.N mo.e eso.s woe.s wme.m osm.s wo~.m Mae.m mm.o no.3 woo.= c:o.: ems. mo~.: som.m omN.N m~.o «Noose< mmo.m emm.m som.m ms.m m~.6 md.m Nms.m o Noupnoo . Bel memos an «N o N a o mmz as a osvmoufi I; z @6004 usesvmomm emsaum choc ca :n so wcwaamce no asap and soapmuvcoosoo macosss mo poogwm .0 mqmm snowshoes mosam> umasnmmln . oom.n oma.o omo.e 0:.N we. no. cases see am.N so.m 62.: Nm.N no. No. no. mo.N NN.m amm~.N wem.e ewes. we“. no. o. mm.o sN.m comm.o oms.e sou. on~.~ oN.N o. m~.o «Noose< omo.n om~.e omm.o can.s omm.~ me. one. o Noopcoo --------uw----------umpmss sue.melm.-- ........ --- 2min came an NH m m N o «:2 ma Mmmswmoual, m, m 6 we an 2 oouc< psoavmwmm owmadm :Noo ca macs cavoma so wcaawmso mo made use coupon»:oocoo swcossm no voommm .u mqmo ucomeuaou meoam> seasons m 0 3 NA.N oo.N mN.N mN.N mN.N mo.N «case see oms.~ aw.~ an.~ as.~ a:.~ Hm.~ nm.~ mo.N mm.“ ~o.~ no.“ mm.« 5.“ mm.“ mm.” ~n.o sm.« am.N um.u am.« m.H on.“ as.” m~.o manosS< owm.H «m.a on.” on.” mm.a an.d mu.a o Houpsoo -------n-----------uoppas sue «0.x, ............. =o.s asses . HM NH N H o mmz mm a osvmommr mquaquM=M¢2mewi z covo< psoawmwmm ommdam caoo ma somehow: Hope» :0 wcaaamce me made and coapmhpsoocoo sacosss mo poommm .m mamm vsomoumoh mesam> usasnmaww so. oo.N so. so.N so.N oo.N scams sac omH.N Amsvss.a AneV3N.N “meand.e_ Amsvom.a Ammvnm.a No Vac.” mo.N mo.a mongoo.a Ammvmo.a fiancee. Ammvfio.a Lemons." Am Vao.N ~m.o so. Romano. Amwvom. Asovmm. Amovao.N Nemcao.a Awmvsm. m~.o macossa saw. fiancee. .movmm. Asovnm. Aesvms. Income. masavmm. o Hopscoo -i--------.-:--------ca»pas sec «min--- ...... a ........ spin modes on «a N a o m=z mm » sapwomb mrm, «m o o m on z.ceoo< asoapsowm ommawm shoe :N cowouads eaosaomcw News: :0 wcaaamco me saw» one sodaoNoSoosoo eacossm no woeumm .m mqm seduces u no'omfi-IbDS-a cmo.a com. com. NA. on. as. cases sea son. Newcom.a Ammvoe.N Namvam.a Aamv «.N Naacmo.o Newcom.a mo.N one. Now No.N Am one. Lemons. Ammw a. Aoavos. Am See. ~m.o om. Non mm. As can. as com. Am an. Asmcam. A: can. m~.o ancoss< was. Iowans. Ammvmm. Ammvms. Aomvmn. Ammvms. Nammvsm. o Hoopeoo ---------------------noppae see colmun-------- ....... -- an N . cams Mm «N. a N o mmz as PmoSpseum .mcw . c o m owl z oooo< pcoEpmomm emsawm choc a“ sewage“: mansaom News; :0 wcwaamso we saw» one soaemupseocoo dwsosas no vacuum .oH mam<9 . 34 Water soluble nitrogen (% of dry matter) increased with added ammonia (P<.01) and time of ensiling. Both intermediate and highest level of added ammonia resulted in higher (P<.05 and .01. reSpectively) mean values than controls (Table 10). Means for days 6. 12. and 54 were higher (P<.05 and .01) than day 0. A strong negative correlation (-.85) between day means for pH (Table 6) and water soluble nitrogen (Table 10) suggests that the apparent increase in water soluble nitrogen over time was inversely related to the rate of pH fall. There- fore. it would appear that the more rapid the decline in pH. the less protein breakdown. Evidence of this has been obtained where crop material was acidified with formic acid during harvesting (McDonald and Edwards. 1976). From the percentage values for water soluble nitrogen (% of total nitrogen) given in Table 10 for day 0 samples. it would appear that extensive proteolysis occurs from the time the crop is harvested. and is accentuated during the ensiling process. Although higher mean values were recorded for ammonia treated silages. it is apparent that increases are higher for controls than treated silages. Pyge amtgg-acids in water phase: Aggregate concentrations of non essential amino acids (Table 11.1) contributed to a greater preportion of the total free amino acids than essen- tial amino acids (Tables 11.2 and 11.3). Of particular import- ance. was the increase noted for alanine (Table 11.1) on high ammonia treatment between days 0 and 54: alanine concentra— tion increased approximately eight-fold above initial values. 35 In terms of % distribution this value would account for 70% of total free non essential amino acids (Table 11.1) and 49% of total free amino acids in the water phase (Table 11.2). The decrease in aSpartic acid (Table 11.1) suggests some conversion to alanine. since aspartic acid can be decarboxy- lated by aSpartate-l-decarboxylase to alanine (Kemble. 1956). However. the relatively small loss in aspartic acid compared to the large increase in alanine discounts aspartic acid as the major contributor (Table 11.1). A more plausable explana- tion for the increased alanine seems through pyruvate. since pyruvate can be reduced to lactic acid. or transaminated to alanine. From the low lactic acid levels (Table 7) recorded for the high ammonia treatment, it seems possible that some of the pyruvate produced was diverted to alanine. Similar observations have been made in continuous culture studies (Erfle gt g;.. 1977) where it was shown that alanine concen- tration rises rapidly when the ammonia concentration is high in the rumen. These workers suggested that the alanine in the rumen was probably acting as a reservoir for ammonia. 36 oomo.mmm oma.:m~ omN.osN oaa.:o~ am ems. o Hm.mm ama.esa cmn.n:N N mm.mN No.ms m«.os oo.oa mo.mm o acacaa< mm.~m mm.- mm.an mo.Ns em sose.m scam.a .ms.NH mme.as H mm.~ so.m c~.m mm. ca.o o maaosau mo.mo mo.NN ea.aoa N~.omN an scam.~m oomm.mm eoa:.N omm.mm N NE.@ w~.mn mm.a~ mo.N Nm.~m o meadows os.sm :N.ea as.mm No.mm an moa.s~ ons~.s~ was.~c can.sm a em.s mm.Nm om.m~ mm.a~ ea.mm o ocaemm Na.om s~.~s as.“ so.mN am eN~.NN sous.m~ soam.o mao.ss a mo.n mo.- =2.N~ mm.o~ an.om o acacomone am.mm NH.N~N mo.aaa so.NNN am eH~.ms pas.NN onm.ss omm.aa a no.~« N~.ma nm.os mo.mm am.es 0 case :oavamam< :::::::::::::ommnnlbmr.Hs\w:::uw:::::::: exam mo.H mm. Tl, mm. o mcaaamno menus kfivmz 3 2 e83 - .3 was 2:5 2H space omega News: ommaam shoe Ofidfim OOH.“ GO wfidfldmfiw H0 05%». USN SOHPdHPQQOSOO “H3055 MO POOMMH Hofid mgm<9 37 enso.mn comm.om oon. cs ooa.n~N an fim one. N ems. Nu mm.mm N an.: N no. N ems. mN No. mm o chcaNm -Nscoam «N.NN «.mn one. N: as. an em am.nN o.~N new. NN as. o: N o~.m m~.e~ mm.mN ma. Nu me. an o acNmousa moos.es ooam.aNN scam. NNN 0mm. mmm .sm a~.mm mN.om NN. an osmfi N as.~N :m.a Nm.m~ me. ea c ocNossN m mm 0 .mm Saw. as can. on an some. .mN momm.mN Boa. oN Mom. an N n~.a ma.mN ma. :N omo. AN 0 acNosaNuomN as. Nu am.n~ N6.N~ can. an an mooo. c oooo.o eooo.o coo. o N N~.N oo. o oo.o oo.o oo. o o ochoNaNos Bee. mm Ema. we so. No mm. mNN am Sun. Nu Ema. Nn use. an cam. as N 66.6 :T om mn.o~ on. em NN. mm o ocNNa> Illlllltlllllltmmdnn ON: HE\&3IIII:III:IIIIII exam mouN o chacho moNos L I we mamml enas< Neoschcoov N.NN mqm sacs op mccommouaom m us.am omw.amm www.mmc oma.umu mm.mmm .mm.mn mum.amma co.oam $0.:«m Hmpoa em.om woo.mm~ mma.mo~ onm.mmm u~.aam mo.:w eea.umm ao.a- Ho.m- < m:.m ~m.n ow.~ a .m a~.H mm.“ ms.~ o .m ~m.~ on.“ e.” mm.a ea< an. as. an. «5. am. as. mm. m . as. ma. cu. «m. use ma. co. _:~.a no.“ as. am. am. am. as. as. me. 0:. cum on. em. an. mo.” mm. a . ma. :m. m . me. a. No. gem an. as. am. am. am. am. on. an. a . am. am. .as. use am. mm.” as.“ so.“ om. mm. ma. mo.” aa. «a. we. «a. nm< -----------------w------------mm.Have» me m------------------------------- . nmz o Podw mm. mm. 0 mo.“ mm. .mu. c me 2 eeee< « o mmmm omega have; owmadm shoe :4 2 ages cause «can so msaaauso_mo cad» c:s.:ouaacum «access no Poomhm :.HH mqm.10). Aging; Respogge: Response of lactating dairy cows to the two NPN treated silages is summarized in Tables 13 through 15. ‘Dry matter intakes from silage (based on a fixed % of total ration as shown in Table h) as Kg/day or % of live #6 TABLE 12. Dry matter. pH, lactic acid and crude protein of corn silage compositesa r b ggem Cold-flo Pro-Sil ssm Effggt Dry matter (fl) 3n.61 36.na .33 P<.05 pH u.uu n.37 .12 NSC Lactic acid ($0M) 6.30 7.67 .15 P<.02 Crude protein ($0M) 13.03 13.20 .16 NS E"Mean values represent averages for 3-four week composites b of the silages fed during the 12 weeks treatment period. SEM 3 standard error of mean difference. ° NS = non significant (P;.10). TABLE 13. Influence of non protein nitrogen source on dry matter and protein intakes of dairy cowsa ‘NBN source Itgm Cold—f;0 Pro-Sil SEMb Effect Silage dry matter (Kg/day) 8. 56 8.75 .3“ NSc (% BW) 1. he 1.u9 .05 NS Total dry matter (Kg/day) 17.39 17.47 .68 NS (5 BW) 3.01 2.95 .10 NS Total crude protein (Kg/day) 2.51 2.57 .11 NS Crude protein from NPN (% of total GP) 16.05 16.75 .08 P<.001 a’Me'an values represent 12 cows per treatment for 12 weeks. SEM a standard error of mean difference. ° NS a non significant (P>.10). a? weight were similar for both groups (Table 13). Previous work (Huber 23 §;.. 1979b) showed depressed intakes by dairy cattle of silage treated at ensiling with .375% gaseous ammonia (82% N). However. this effect was not found to be consistent (Huber 23 g;.. 1979b). Intakes of total dry matter as Kg/day or % of live weight were also similar for both silages (Table 13). Intakes of total crude protein tended to be higher for the Pro-Sil group. but differences were not significant. However, intakes of crude protein from NPN (% of total crude protein) were higher (P‘.001) for the Pro-Sil than Cold-flo group (Table 13). A higher intake of silage dry matter by the Pro-Sil group. though not significant might explain the higher NPN intake (Table 13). Milk yields of cows averaged about 28 Kg/day during pre- treatment (Table lh). The decrease in milk yields from pre- treatment to the end of the trial was probably due to cows being put on trial in mid lactation, averaging about 125 days postpartum when treatment commenced. Milk yields and persis- tencies during treatment were slightly higher for cows on Cold-flo, whereas fat-corrected and solids-corrected milk were slightly higher for those on Pro-Sil, but differences were not significant. Milk components were all within the normal range, and did not differ significantly between groups (Table 15). Both groups gained .29 kg body weight during treatment, typical of cows after peak lactation. Efficiency of conversion of feed to milk was also similar for both groups (Table 15). #8 TABLE 1n. Influence of non protein nitrogen source on milk yields of dairy cowsa NPN source . b tem Cold-flo Pro-Si; SEM Effect Pretreatment (Kg/day) 28.07 28.32 Treatment (Kg/day) 29.88 2h.25 1.32 NSC Persistencyif)d I 88.96 85.40 2.9h NS Fat corrected milk (Kg/day) 21.89 22.15 1.22 NS Solid corrected milk (Kg/day) 22.21 22.27 1.20 NS fMean values other than pretreatment represent 12 cows per b treatment. SEM = standard error of mean difference. ° NS = non significant (P>.10). d Persistency (%) = (treatment milk/pretreatment milk) x 100. TABLE 15. Influence of non protein nitrogen source on milk composition, weight change and‘feed effeciency of dairy cows Itgm_ - Cold-flo Pro-Sil SEEP Effect Milk composition c Protein (fi) 3.20 3.06 .11 NS Fat (%) 3.20 3.ua .13 NS Solids not fat ($) 8.76 8.75 .13 NS Weight change (Kg/day) .29 .29 .08 NS Feed efficiencyd 1.u3 1.u1 .08 NS a'iiVIean values represent 12 cows per treatment for 12 weeks. b SEM I standard error of mean difference. 3 NS a non significant (P>.10). Feed efficiency a treatment milk yield/total dry matter intake. “9 Although there have been no previous comparisons between the feeding value of corn silages treated with Cold-flo and Pro-Sil for dairy cattle. these results compare favorably with those of Donaldson and Thomas, (1978) for Cold-flo treated corn silage, and of Huber 23 al.. (1979b) for Pro- Sil treated corn silage. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS This study consisted of two experiments. Experiment 1 determined the nature of the protein break-down occuring in corn silages treated with or without ammonia. Whole chopped corn plants (32-34% DM) were treated with 0. .25. .52. or 1.08% added N as ammonia (of silage dry matter). Immediately after treatment. about 3 kg material were placed in 5 mil polythene bags which were then evacuated and served as experimental silos. Silage samples were taken on days 0. 1. 2, 6, 12 and Sh and analyzed for dry matter. pH, lactic acid, total and water-insoluble nitrogen, and free amino acids in the water phase. The fermentation patterns for dry matter. pH. lactic acid, total and water insoluble nitrogen were similar to those reported by other researchers (Britt and Huber. 1975: Huber gt_gl.. 1980b) for ammonia treated corn silage. Alanine concentrations increased substantially over time in the water phase of high ammonia treated silages, a phenomenon which is.apparently not related to proteolytic effects. It was suggested that the increased alanine was probably through pyruvate. Increased total amino acid N between days 0 and 5h on high ammonia treatment would account for 2.h% of total basal (original) nitrogen if alanine increase assumed equal to controls. Apart from the large 50 51 increases in alanine. these data support earlier studies that suggest that ammonia inhibits plant protein breakdown. Further eXperimentation is needed to more clearly define the nature of alanine increases in ammonia-treated silages. and possible nutritional significance in ruminant nutrition. In Experiment 2, 29 lactating Holstein cows were employed to determine the relative feeding value of corn silages treated with Pro-Sil or anhydrous ammonia (by Cold-flo process). Prior to going on trial, cows received a standard- ization ration (1h% crude protein) for 1h days. Thereafter. cows were paired based for milk yields. stage of lactation. breeding group and age. Within each pair. experimental diets (49 to 50% of either treated silage) were randomly assigned. The feeding period lasted for 12 weeks. during which time silage samples were collected and analyzed for dry matter. pH. lactic acid and crude protein. Daily dry matter intakes and milk weights were recorded, and biweekly milk samples analyzed for milk fat, protein and total solids. Cows were weighed on two consecutive days, seven days after beginning and at the end of treatment. Dry matter content of silages was higher for the Pro-Sil than Cold-flo treated, which was apparently due to a higher dry matter of corn plant material entering the Pro-Sil silo, or the added minerals and molasses in Pro-Sil. Lactic acid was also higher for the Pro-Sil silage. but differences in pH and crude protein were negligible. Dry matter and total crude protein intakes were similar for 52 both silages. However, the slightly higher intake of silage (based on a fixed % of total ration) by the Pro-Sil group was reflected in a higher intake of crude protein from NPN. No major differences in milk yields, persistencies. milk components or feed efficiencies were observed between groups during treatment. Both groups showed similar weight gains. These data suggest that Cold-flo treated corn silages can be used as efficienty as Pro-Sil treated silages in rations for lactating dairy cows. However. rations containing Cold-flo treated corn silage would need greater mineral supplementation than those with Pro-Sil silage. Bibliography Andrieu. J. and C. Demarquilly. 1974. Feeding value of maize forage 111. Influence of composition and fermentation characteristics on digestibility and voluntary intake of maize silage. Ann. Zootech. 23:27. AOAC. 1965. Official Methods of Analysis (10th Ed.) Associa- tion of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington. D.C. Balch. C. C. 1967. Problems in predicting the value of non- protein nitrogen as a substitute for protein in rations for farm ruminants. World Review of Animal Production. 3:84. Barker. S. B. and W. H. Summerson. 1941. The colorimetric determination of lactic acid in biological material. Jo B1010 Chemo 13835350 Barnett. A. J. G. 1954. Silage Fermentation. Academic Press. Inc. New York. Bentley. 0. 6.. E. W. Klosterman and P. Engle. 1955. The use of urea to increase the crude protein content of corn silage ior fattening steers. Ohio Agr. Expt. Sta. Res. 3111. 77 e Bergen. W. G. 1975. The influence of silage fermentation on nitrogen utilisation. Proc. 2nd Annu. Silage Symp.. Ann Arbor. MI. Bergen. W. G. 1980. The ensiling process of corn silage. In. Peed Management. A Watt Publn. Dec. p.22. Bergen. W. G.. E.M. Cash and H. E. Henderson. 1974. Changes in nitrogenous compounds of the whole corn plant during ensiling and subsequent effects on dry matter intake by sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 39:629. Boman. R. L. 1980. Influence of source and level of non- protein nitrogen additions on the nutritive value of corn silage. Ph.D. Thesis. Mich. State Univ.. E. Lansing. 53 54 Bothast. R. J.. E. B. Lancaster and C. W. Hesseltine. 1973. Agmogia kills Spoilage molds in corn. J. Dairy Sci. 5 :2 1. . Brady. C. J. 1966. The redistribution of nitrogen in silage by lactic-acid-producing bacteria. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 1931230 Britt. D. G. 1973. Effect of organic acids and non-protein nitrogen on fungal growth. nutritive value. fermenta- tion and refermentation of corn silage and high moisture corn. Ph.D. Thesis. Mich. State Univ.. E. Lansing. Britt. D. G. and J. T. Huber. 1975. Fungal growth during fermentation and refermentation of non-protein nitrogen treated corn silage. J. Dairy Sci. 58:1666. Buchanan-Smith. J. G. 1980. cold-flo ammonia treatment on corn for silage at two dry matter levels and its preservation and feeding value for yearling steers. 72nd Ann. Mtg. Am. Soc. Anim. Sci. p.349 (Abstr.). Chalupa. W. V. 1978. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. Production of animal protein from non-protein nitrogen chemicals. Mendel Friedman ed.. Plenum Press. NeYe 1058h730 Cook. R. J. and D. a. Fox. 1976. Anhydrous ammonia addition to corn silage. J. Anim. Sci. 43:317 (Abstr.). Coppock. C. E. and J. B. Stone. 1968. Corn silage in the ration of dairy cattle: A review. New York State Collegg of Agriculture-Cornell University Misc: B1111 e‘ 9 e Demarquilly. C. and J. Andrieu. 1973. Nutritive value and utilisation by cattle of green. ensiled and dehydrated whole maize plant. Proc. 24th Annu. Meeting Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod.. Vienna. Austria. Sept. 1973. DeVuyst. A.. W. Vervack. M. Vanbelle. and V. Jadin. 1971. Z. fur Tierphysiol. Tierernahr. und Futtermittelk. 27:82. Donaldson. B. M. and J. W. Thomas. 1978. Personal communica- tion. Egan. A. R. and R. J. Moir. 1965. Nutritional status and intake regulation in sheep 1. Effects of duodenally infused single doses of casein. urea and propionate upon voluntary intake of low protein roughage by sheep. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 16:437. 55 Erfle. J. D.. F. D. Sauer. and S. Mahadevan. 1977. Effect of ammonia concentration on activity of enzymes of ammonia assimilation and on synthesis of amino acids by mixed gumenéBacteria in continuous culture. J. Dairy Sci. 0310 0 Fox. D. G. and R. J. Cook. 1977. Performance of steer calves fed corn silage treated with three sources of anhydrous amgogia. Mich. State Univ.. Agr. Expt. Sta.. Res. Rep. 32 : 9. Geasler. M. R. 1970. The effect of corn silage maturity. harvesting techniques and storage factors on fermenta- tion parameters and cattle performance. Ph.D. Thesis. Mich. State Univ.. E. Lansing. Gill. J. L. 1978. Design and analysis of experiments in the animal and medical sciences: Vol. 1. Iowa State Univ. Press. Ames. Goffart. M. A. 1877. The Ensiling of Maize and Other Green Fodder Crops. Trans. and Publ.. by J. B. Brown. Greenhill. W. L. 1964. The buffering capacity of pasture ’plants with special reference to ensilage. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 15:511. Hawkins. D. R. 1969. The effect of dry matter levels of alfalfa silage on intake and metabolism in the rumi- nant. Ph.D. Thesis. Mich. State Univ.. E. Lansing. Henderson. H. E. and W. G. Bergen. 1972. Treating corn silage with gaseous ammonia for feed lot cattle. Mich. State Univ.. Agr. Expt., Sta. R68. Rep. 17u'180 Hillman. D. and D. G. Fox. 1977. Nutrient content of corn silage. In. Corn Silage. Mich. State Univ. Ext. Bull. E-1139 o Honig. H. and E. Zimmer. 1975. Experiments on use of Pro-Sil as a NPN additive for maize silages. Proc. 2nd Ann. Silage Symp. Ann Arbor. MI. Huber. J. T. 1975. Protein and non-protein nitrogen utilisa- tion in practical dairy rations. J. Anim. Sci. 41:954. Huber. J. T. 1979a. Making good silage is an art and a science. In. Hoards Dairyman. August Publication. p. 1059. 56 Huber. J. T.. H. F. Bucholtz and R. L. Boman. 1980a. Ammonia versus urea-treated silages with varying urea in concentrates. J. Dairy Sci. 63:76. Huber. J. T.. J. Foldager and N. E. Smith. 1979c. Nitrogen distribution in corn silage treated with varying levels of ammonia. J. Anim. Sci. 48:1509. Huber. J. T. and L. Kung Jr. 1981. Protein and non protein gitrogen utilisation in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. :1170. Huber. J. T.. R. E. Lichtenwalner. R. E. Ledebuhr and C. M. Hansen. 1979b. Gaseous ammonia treatment of corn silage for dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 62:965. Huber. J. T.. R. E. Lichtenwalner and J. W. Thomas. 1973. Factors affecting response of lactating cows to ammonia- treated corn silages. J. Dairy Sci. 56:1283. Huber. J. T. and 0. P. Santana. 1972. Ammonia treated corn silage for dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 55:489. Huber. J. T. N. E. Smith and J. Stiles. 1980b. Influence of time after ensiling on distribution of nitrogen in corn silage treated with ammonia. J. Anim.Sci. 51:1387. Huber. J. T. and J. W. Thomas. 1971. Urea-treated corn silage in low protein rations for lactating cows J. Dairy 8310 54:224. Huber. J. T.. J. W. Thomas and R. S. Emery. 1968. Response of lactating cows fed urea-treated corn silage harvgsged at varying stages of maturity. J. Dairy Sci. 5131 0 0 Hughes. A. D. 1970. The non-protein nitrogen composition of grass silages 11. The changes occurring during the storage of silage. J. Agric Sci.‘Camb. 75:421. Hughes. A. D. 1971. The non-protein nitrogen composition of grass silage 111. The composition of spoilt silages. J. Agric. SCiep Cambe 76.329. Jenkins. H. M. 1884. Report on the practise of ensilage at home and abroad. Royal Agr. Soc. J. 20:126. Johnson. R. R.. K. E. McClure. L. J. Johnson. E. W. Klosterman and G. B. Triplett. 1966. Corn plant maturity. I. Changes in dry matter and protein distribution in corn plants. Agron. J. 58:151. ' 57 Johnson. R. R.. K. E. McClure. E. W. Klosterman and L. J. Johnson. 1967. Corn plant maturity. 3. Distribution of nitrogen in corn silage treated with limestone. urea and diammonium phosphate. J. Anim. Sci. 26:394. Johnston. J. F. W. 1843. The feeding qualities of the natural and artificial grasses in different States of dryness. Agr. Soc. Scotland. 1:57(Trans.). Juengst. F.. H. E. Henderson. J. Walters. J. Pieper. K. Kramer and J. Dika. 1975. Effect of Pro-Sil treatment on the microbiologiCal and chemical characteristics of corn silage during primary and secondary fermentation. Proc. 2nd Ann. Silage Symp. Ann Arbor. MI. Kemble. A. R. 1956. Studies on the nitrogen metabolism of the ensilage process. J. Sci. Food Agric. 7:125. Kempton. A. G. 1958. Bacterial. biochemical and environmental interrelations in fresh and ensiled forages. Ph.D. Thesis. Mich. State Univ.. E. Lansing. Langston. C. W.. C. Bouma and R. M. Conner. 1962b. Chemical and bacteriological changes in grass silage during the early stages of fermentation. 11. Bacteriological changes. J. Dairy Sci. 45:618. Langston. C. W.. H. G. Wiseman. C. H. Gordon. W. C. Jacobson. C. G. Melin. L. A. Moore and J. R. McCalmont. 1962a. Chemical and bacteriological changes in grass silage during the early stages of fermentation. I. Chemical , changes. J. Dairy Sci. 45:396. Lomas. L. W.. D. G. Fox. W. G. Bergen and J. R. Black. 1978. The effect of anhydrous ammonia treated corn silage and protein supplementation strategy on the performance of growing and finishing steers Mich. State Univ.. Agr. Expt. Sta.. Res. Rep. 353:143. Mabbit. L. A. 1951. The role of plant cells in the ensilage process: an approach to the problem. Proc. Soc. appl. Bact. 14:147. Mac Pherson. H. T. and P. Violante. 1966. Ornithine putrescine and cadaverine in farm silage. J. Sci. Fd. Agric. 17:124. Mc Cullough. M. E. 1961. A study of factors associated with silage fermentation and dry matter intake by dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci. 20:288. Mc Cullough. M. E. 1973. Optimum feeding of dairy animals for meat and milk. Univ. of Georgia Press. Athens. 58 McDonald. P. and R. A. Edwards. 1976. The influence of conservation methods on digestion and utilisation of forages by ruminants. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 35:201. McDonald. P. J. and A. R. Henderson. 1962. Buffering capacity of herbage samples as a factor in ensilage. J. Sci. FOOd Agric. 1333950 McDonald. P. and R. Whittenbury. 1973. The ensilage process. In. Chemistry and Biochemistry of Herbage. Vol. 3. (G. W. Butler and R. W. Bailey eds.) Academic Press: New York and London. “ Melvin. J. F. 1965. Variations in the carbohydrate content of lucerene and the effect on ensilage. Aus. J. Agric. Res. 1639510 Miles. M. 1918. Silos. ensilage and silage. A practical treatise on the ensilage of fodder corn. Orange Judd. Co. N.Y. Miller. W. J.. H. L. Dalton and J. K. Miller. 1961. Sudan grass silage at two stages of maturity versus ryegrass and crimson clover with two filling procedures. J. Dairy Sci. 44:1921. Mo. M. and E. Fyrileiv. 1979. Methods of estimating ensiling losses. Acta Agriculturea Scandinavica 29:49. NRC. 1976. Urea and other non protein nitrogen compounds in animal nutrition. Nat. Acad. Sci. Washington. D.C. Nilsson. R.. L. Toth and C. Rydin. 1956. Studies on fermenta- tion processes in silage. The role of temperature. Arch. fur Mikrobiologic. 23:366. Ohshima. M. 1970. Studies on the fate of free amino acids in silage 1. The fate of monoamino dicarboxylic acids in reg clover juice during incubation. Jap. J. Zootech $01. 1397. Ohshima. M. and P. McDonald. 1978. A review of the changes in nitrogenous compounds of herbage during ensilage. J. Sci. Fd. Agric. 29:497. Ohyama. Y. and S. Masaki. 1974. Effects of ensilage tempera- ture on silage fermentation with Special reference to the stage of the temperature treatment and soluble carbohydrate content of the material. Jap. J. Zootech. SCis u58h190 59 Ohyama. Y.. S. Masaki and T. Morichi. 1970 Studies on various factors affecting silage fermentation§V111. Changes in microflora and organic acid composition during ensilage as affected by the introduction of air after ensiling. Jap. J. Zootech. Sci. 41:625. Ohyama. T.. S. Masaki and T. Morichi. 1973. Effects of temper- ature and glucose addition on the process of silage fermentation. Jap. J. Zootech Sci. 44:59. Reid. J. T. 1953. Urea as protein replacement for ruminants. ' A review. J. Dairy Sci. 36:955. Ruxton. I. B. and P. J. McDonald. 1974. The influence of oxygen on ensilage 1. Laboratory studies. J. Sci. Food Agric. 253107. Satter. L. D. and R. E. Roffler. 1975. Nitrogen requirement and utilisation in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 58:1219. Smith. R. H.. D. N. Salter and K. Daneshvar. 1977. Utilisa- tion of nitrogenous nutrients and particularly NPN by the bovine. J. Nuclear agric. biol. 6:8. Soper. I. G. and F. G. Owen. 1977. Improving silage preserva- tion and stability with an ammonia-molasses-mineral solution. J. Dairy Sci. 60:1077. Takahashi. M. 1970. Influence of level of initial air inclu- sion in ensiling on.quality of silage. 7. Relation of the level of initial air inclusion and the seepage cf piang juice to the quality. J. Jap. Soc. Grassland Sci. 1 :9 . U.S.D.A. 1981. Crop production-Annual Summary. p. A-3. Van Horn. H. H.. C. F. Foreman and J. E. Rodriguez. 1968. Effect of high-urea supplementation on feed intake and milk production of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 50:709. Voss. N. 1966. Amines and ammonia as products of protein decomposition in silage. Proc. 10th Int. Grassland Congress (Helsinki). p. 540. Waldo. D. R. 1968. Symposium. Nitrogen utilisation by the ruminant. Nitrogen metabolism in the ruminant. J. Dairy Sci. 51:2 5. Waldo. D. R. and N. A. Jorgensen. 1981. Forages for high animal production: Nutritional factors and effects of conservation. J. Dairy Sci. 64:1207. 60 Watson. S. J. and M. J. Nash. 1960. The Conservation of Grass and Forage Crops. Oliver and Boyd. London. Whittenbury. R.. P. McDonald and D. G. Bryan Jones. 1967. A short review of some biochemical and microbiological aSpects of ensilage. J. Sci. Fd-Agric. 18:441. Wieringa. G. W. 1960. Some factors affecting silage fermenta- tion. Proc. 8th Inter. Grassland Congress. p.497. Wilkinson. J. M. 1978. The ensiling of forage maize: effects on composition and nutritive value. In. Forage Maize: Production and Utilisation. E. S. Bunting g: §;(eds.). London . ARC . Zimmer. E. 1969. Biochemische Grundlagen der Einsauerung. Proc. 3rd Gen. Meet. Grassld. Fed. Braunschweig. p.113. Zimmer. L. 1971. Factors affecting silage fermentation in silo. Inter. Silage and Res. Conf.