A QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS
OF PARENTAL DECISION-MAKING
IN REGARDS TO HOMESCHOOLING
By
Pamela Lou Rogers Campbell

A DISSERTATION
Submitted to
Michigan State University
in partial fulfillment of the requirements
for the degree of
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
K-12 Educational Administration
2012

ABSTRACT
A QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF PARENTAL
DECISION-MAKING IN REGARDS TO HOMESCHOOLING
By
Pamela Lou Rogers Campbell
Researchers have spent a relatively small amount of time focusing on homeschooling.
The few studies which have been completed regarding homeschooling have skirted the question
of the decision-making process taken by parents as they choose to begin or discontinue
homeschooling. The void in the academic knowledge regarding this growing trend in education
has been filled with the data and analysis of this study. By using a qualitative methodology I
was not only able to gain insight into the thoughts and experiences of homeschool parents, I was
able to hear their passion for their children’s education and see their excitement as they described
their familiarity with the twists and turns and emotions of the pathway to their final decision.
This study addresses the questions: “What process do parents go through when making
the decision to begin or discontinue homeschooling their children?” And “What circumstances
precipitate a parent’s decision to move their children to homeschool or to end homeschooling?”
Fourteen families were interviewed and data was collected and analyzed to determine the answer
using a decision-making model made up of six different processes. Additionally, the
precipitating circumstances were collected and categorized into sub-groups to clearly view the
outcome of the evaluation of the data.
The results of this study indicate that two decision-making processes, convergence and
insightful, dominated the corridor to the final choice of the initial child’s educational placement.
All of the parents in the study had friends who homeschooled and regardless of their background,
were concerned about beginning to homeschool their own children.

Copyright by
PAMELA LOU ROGERS CAMPBELL
2012

DEDICATION

I dedicate this work to the following individuals:
To my past: My late father, Frank S. Rogers and mother, Alice E. Rogers
My present: My loving husband Harold Campbell
My future: My sons, Dr. Mark Campbell and First Lieutenant Jonathan Campbell

iv

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I am thankful to God for being my guiding light throughout this work as well as in life.
He gave me the insight and tenacity to see this project through to the end.
My undying gratitude and eternal thanksgiving goes to my husband Harold for
supporting, loving, and encouraging me during the long nights of researching and typing. Thank
you also to my wonderful sons, Mark and Jonathan, for accompanying me to the MSU Library to
do research and for never giving up on me. Thank you to my parents, Alice and Frank, who
helped me to develop into a life-long learner and supported me in any endeavor I attempted.
A very special thank you goes to my advisor and committee chair person, Dr. Kristy
Cooper. Her guidance, support, and confidence in my abilities have been especially appreciated.
Her willingness to become my advisor and committee chairperson in my final year of work has
won my eternal gratefulness and admiration.
I also wish to thank my committee members for their input and support. Thank you to
Dr. Susan Printy for working tirelessly to find a new advisor to help me finish my dissertation
and for her positive words of encouragement. Thank you to Dr. David Arsen for his guidance
through EAD 995 and helping me develop my ideas into a proposal. Thank you to Dr. Maria
Teresa Tatto for training me in the techniques of program evaluation and for all of her support
and encouragement all along the way. Thank you to my former advisor Dr. Phil Cusick for
continually asking me, “What do you want to know?” and for never giving up on me.
Appreciation and thank you to the fourteen families who opened up their doors and hearts
and let me learn about parental decision-making from those who had experienced the pathway to
their choice of learning environments. Their willingness to share their experiences and
understanding of the processes made a lasting impact on me.
v

PREFACE

As I evaluated options for my dissertation I contemplated various educational concerns.
While discussing the alternatives with Dr. Phil Cusick, a professor (ret.) at Michigan State
University, he asked what I knew about homeschooling. At the time I had several friends and
acquaintances who were homeschooling their children. I began to read about homeschooling and
talk to other educators and friends.
As a K-12 superintendent I had known families who had left their traditional school
setting to begin homeschooling, as well as many children who registered for school after having
been homeschooled for years. While spending time investigating children who were
homeschooled and working with my advisor, Dr. Kristy Cooper, I was able to focus on my
interest in the decision-making process as families follow a pathway to their final choice for the
education of their children. My personal network in the mid-Michigan Christian community
gave me an opportunity to continue to learn about homeschooling.
When parents choose to homeschool it is a critical life-changing decision. The decisionmaking pathway is filled with twists and turns, emotional ups and downs, and thoughtful
conversations. The drive of a parent to provide the ultimate in an educational learning
environment for their child is an integral part of the decision-making process. Throughout the
text I give a close look into the families who followed a thoughtful pathway to begin
homeschooling. Of special interest to many, I also include a depiction of the process families
take to discontinue homeschooling. As you read the quotes, you will become acquainted with
the families who spent many hours lovingly soul-searching and discussing their child’s future.
The support of my advisor, friends, and family made it possible for me to discover, analyze, and
produce this dissertation.
vi

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF TABLES………………………………………………………………………….….....ix
LIST OF FIGURES..……………………………………………………………………………..x
CHAPTER 1: HOMESCHOOLING: AN EDUCATIONAL CHOICE………………………… 1
1.1 Introduction…………………….…………………………………………………....1
CHAPTER 2: HOMESCHOOLING IN AMERICA.…………………………………………… 4
2.1 Purpose of the Study………….………………………………………………………4
2.2 What We Know About Homeschooling…………….……………………………..... 4
2.3 History and Growth of the Homeschooling Movement in the United States...........…8
2.4 Characteristics of Homeschooled Children……………….……………..........…….17
2.5 Decision-Making………………………………………………..…………………..18
2.6 Decision-Making Theories..............……………..………………………………….20
2.7 Research Questions……..………………….……………….…………….……….. 26
CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY……………………….…………………..………………….28
3.1 Sample Selection…………………………..……………………….………………28
3.2 Introduction to the Families.…………………………….…..……….……………..31
3.3 Data Collection…………….……………………………………………..................36
3.4 Data Analysis………..…………………..……….…….……………….…….…... .38
3.5 Validity and Reliability….……..…….………………………………….……….....40
CHAPTER 4: FINDINGS ON PARENTAL DECISION-MAKING PATHWAY…….……….44
4.1 Convergence Decision-Making……………………….………..….……………….46
4.2 Insightful Decision-Making…………..…………………..………….….………….57
4.3 Similarities Between Convergence and Insightful………………………..………...69
4.4 Additional Decision-Making Pathways……………..…………………….….……..73
4.5 Subsequent Children………….………………………….……………………….....79
4.6 Discontinuing Homeschooling……………..………………….……………….…...85
4.7 Summary………………………………..…………………………………….……92
CHAPTER 5: FINDINGS ON THE CIRCUMSTANCES THAT PRECIPITATED THE
ACTIVATION OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS ……..………………..94
5.1 Circumstances………..……………………………………………………...……..94
5.2 Specific Events…………..……………………………………………….…….…..96
5.3 Events that Precipitate the Discontinuance of Homeschooling …………..….........100
5.4 Condition of Schools and Families………………..……………………....….…...102
5.5 Conditions of Schools and Families that Precipitated Discontinuance of
Homeschooling…………………..……………………………….………….……106
5.6 Characteristics of Parents………..…………………………………….………….111
5.7 Characteristics of Parents who Discontinued Homeschooling ………..…………..116
vii

5.8 Characteristics of the Children…..……………………………………..……..…..118
5.9 Characteristics of the Children Influences Discontinuance of
Homeschooling…………………………………………….………………………122
5.10 Chapter Summary………………………………………………………….……..124
CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS…..…………………………………126
6.1 Introduction…………………………………………………….…………………126
6.2 Parental Decision-Making Process………………..…….……………..……….…130
6.3 Circumstances Precipitating the Decision-Making Process……………………….134
6.4 Implications……………..……………………………………………….………..141
6.5 Future Research….……………………..…….………………………….………..144
6.6 Conclusion…………………………………………………..…………….………147
APPENDICES…………….…………………………………………………………………..151
Appendix A Letter Requesting Interview……………………………………..............152
Appendix B Interview Consent Form…………………………………………………153
Appendix C Interview Protocol………………………………………………………..155
BIBLIOGRAPHY……………………………………………………………………………....158

viii

LIST OF TABLES
Table 3.1 Introduction to Families and the Grade Their Child Began Homeschooling …...……28
Table 3.2 Disclosure of Convenience and Snowball Sample Interviewees……..………………30
Table 3.3 Comparison Data for U.S. Population, NHES Homeschooling Survey (IESd, 2007)
and My Study........................................................................................………………43
Table 4.1 Characteristics of the Decision-Making Process for Families who Followed the
Convergence Model…………………………………………………………………..46
Table 4.2 Characteristics of the Decision-Making Process for Families that Followed the
Insightful Model………………………………….………………………………...…58
Table 4.3 Traits of Families who Discontinued Homeschooling………………………………..85
Table 5.1 Circumstances Precipitating the Decision-Making Process………………………..…95

ix

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2.1 Decision-Making Process Pictorial Representation..……………………….………..22
Figure 3.1 Frequency of Number of Children Homeschooled per Family….……..………….…31
Figure 3.2 Location of Interview……………………….……………………………………..…32
Figure 3.3 Presence of Children During the Interview…………………………………………..33
Figure 3.4 Frequency of Initial Grade for Homeschooling.……………………………………...34
Figure 3.5 Homeschool Educator’s Field of Expertise…………………………………………..35
Figure 3.6 Highest Degree Attained by the Predominate Homeschool Educator…….………….36
Figure 4.1 Decision-Making Process for Initial Child When Beginning to Homeschool……….45
Figure 4.2 Decision-Making Process for Subsequent Children When Beginning to
Homeschool……………………………………………………………………….…..83
Figure 4.3 Decision-Making Process for Discontinuing to Homeschool………………………..86
Figure 5.1 Percentage in Each of the Four Types of Precipitating Circumstances………………94
Figure 5.2 Percentages of Families that Disclosed Precipitating Circumstances in Various
Categories (Specific Events, Conditions of Schools and Families, Characteristics of
Parents and Characteristics of Child)………………………………………………....96
Figure 5.3 Percentage of Events that Precipitated the Decision-Making Process to Begin or
Discontinue Homeschooling……………………………………………………….…97
Figure 5.4 Percentages of Conditions of Schools and Families Precipitating the Decision-Making
Process to Begin or Discontinue Homeschooling…………………………...………103
Figure 5.5 Percentages of the Identified Characteristics of Parents who Precipitated the DecisionMaking Process………...……………………………………………………………112
Figure 5.6 Percentage of Circumstances Citied as Being Characteristics of a Child…………..119

x

CHAPTER 1: HOMESCHOOLING: AN EDUCATIONAL CHOICE

1.1 Introduction
Families today have five basic options for educating their children: Traditional public
school, public charter school including online charter schools, private religious school, private
independent school and homeschool, which is also termed “domestic instruction” or “home
education” (Gaither, 2008; Belfield, 2004). Of the five options, homeschooling is gaining in
popularity at the greatest rate, with a 74 percent increase from 1999 to 2007 (IESa, 2007; Ray,
2009). This increase is twelve times greater than the number of students who began attending
public school during that same time period (Kunzman, 2009).
Children are considered homeschooled when their instruction and learning primarily take
place at home (Van Galen & Pitman, 1991). The National Home Educational Survey Program
(NHES) defines homeschooled students as follows: students are “considered to be homeschooled
if their parents reported them being schooled at home instead of a public or private school, if
their enrollment in public or private schools did not exceed 25 hours per week, and if they were
not being homeschooled solely because of temporary illness” (IESc, 2001).
Collom and Mitchell (2005) argue “Homeschooling is both a means of educating children
according to parental standards and an alternative social movement embracing a unique set of
cultural norms and values.” This type of schooling is not defined by strangers working in a
bureaucratic educational organization; rather it is defined by the parents of the child, many times
in cooperation with other parents who form cooperative groups to educate their children together
one or two days a week. Families may educate their children independently, with the guidance
of a homeschool organization, or under a collaborative homeschool group.

1

Eighty-four percent of homeschoolers are homeschooled only, while sixteen percent of
homeschooled students also participate in a program at a local school (IESa, 2007). Over the
past ten years many families have embraced homeschooling. Under the auspices of the United
States Department of Education Center for Educational Statistics, the National Household
Education Survey Program (NHES) completed a telephone survey in 2007 concerning “Parent
and Family Involvement in Education.” The sample for the 2007 NHES survey was 10,681
students, 301 of which were homeschooled. Given that there are 53.2 million students in the
United States, this rate implies that there are about 1.5 million homeschooled children nationally,
which amounts to 2.9 percent of all school-aged children (IESa, 2007).
While homeschoolers are traditionally and predominately fundamentalist Christians who
cite religious motivations for homeschooling, parents who homeschool their children come from
a diverse mix of religious affiliations, political views, and value bases. (Bolick, 1987; Mayberry,
1987; Nemer, 2002; Van Galen, 1988; Welner & Welner, 1999; Lines 2000). From Christian
fundamentalists and left-wing radicals to celebrities and transient military families, the
nationwide acceptance of homeschooling has impacted the way that families homeschool and
who has chosen to homeschool their children (Gaither, 2008). One homeschooling mother, when
interviewed by a researcher, said, “Our decision is an individual decision. It’s not a decision to
change the world or change the system” (Welner, 2002, p11).
While we have solid information on the reasons parents choose to homeschool, we do not
currently understand how parents make those vitally important decisions either to start or stop
homeschooling their children. Such a decision is a potentially life-changing moment in the life of
a child and his or her family, and if made without a full understanding of the potential
implications and consequences, the decision to start or stop homeschooling could be harmful to a

2

child’s education and development. With a growing population of parents opting for
homeschooling, we must understand whether families are merely jumping on board with a
current trend or thoughtfully weighing their options and collecting information before taking the
leap. If it is the former, then there may be cause for concern regarding the long-term
consequences of an ill-informed trend. If it is the latter, then educators within traditional school
settings may need to rethink whether and how they are meeting the needs of individual children.
Regardless, the growing interest in homeschooling suggests that schools must do more to meet
the needs of these families. For all of these reasons, further insight into the decision-making
processes around homeschooling could help strengthen the knowledge base such that
homeschooling is either enhanced so as to be more effective, or reduced, so as to minimize the
burden on families as they contemplate the best educational environment for their child. A
secondary concern would focus on parents who went through a decision-making process to
choose homeschooling, then went through a process to choose to move to another option other
than homeschooling. Additional insight into a family’s decision-making process as they
investigate the pros and cons of discontinuing homeschooling will benefit parents who have
concerns with their child’s education. Parents may not have the background to teach advanced
classes, so they may need to rethink their decision to teach their children at home. Furthermore,
some children and their parents may not have the temperament it takes to homeschool. This
study reviewed the pertinent homeschooling research and incorporated in-depth interviews with
parents who have homeschooled their children. In this dissertation telling the stories of fourteen
families, I demonstrate the critical nature of the progression parents go through from the initial
contemplation of the idea to begin or discontinue homeschooling their child through the
decision-making process and ending with a definitive choice.

3

CHAPTER 2: HOMESCHOOLING IN AMERICA

2.1 Purpose of the Study
The purpose of this study was to examine the pathways families follow through the
decision-making process along the way to beginning or ending homeschooling their children.
This section begins with a review of the literature describing what is known about
homeschooling and why parents choose to homeschool their children. Next is a review of
literature and research on the characteristics of homeschooled children. The third section,
presents a discussion of the theoretical basis through which parental decision-making was
viewed and analyzed.

2.2 What We Know About Homeschooling
Beginning in the 1990’s the United States government began periodically surveying
homeschoolers to learn more about the reasons why parents were choosing homeschooling. The
data from the three National Household Education Surveys (1999, 2003, and 2007) has provided
information summarizing reasons why parents choose to homeschool their children. The 2007
study determined that the six reasons given the most in order of dominance were (1) religious
instruction, (2) a combination of safety, drugs or negative peer pressure, (3) dissatisfaction with
the instruction of the academic curriculum in traditional private and public schools, (4) a
combination of family time, finances, travel, and distance, (5) interest in educating their children
with a nontraditional approach, and (6) health problem or special needs (IESa, 2007).
The most common reason parents gave for homeschooling their child, given by thirty-six
percent of respondents, was “to provide moral or religious instruction” (IESd, 2007). Many
homeschool families intend for their children to learn specific beliefs, values, and skills and view
4

teaching their children at home to be a directive from God, which represents their obedience and
reliance on Biblical foundational ideology (Klicka, 2006). Some homeschoolers believe that
they will strengthen their relationship with their children through homeschooling and teach them
that their family is very important in our society (Van Galen & Pitman, 1991). Noted Christian
psychologist and author Dr. James Dobson (2000) said that, “Homeschooling is the most Biblical
form of education. God addresses parents, not government employees, as the educators of their
own children.” Religion was cited by Olsen (2008) as being one of the primary motivational
factors that initially spur parents to select homeschooling for their children.
Twenty-one percent of parents answering the NHES gave safety, drugs or negative peer
pressure as a reason to homeschool their children (IESd, 2007). In his dissertation for the
University of Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada, Olsen (2008) discussed eight motivating factors that
led parents to choose homeschooling. Two of the eight factors were the fact that the child was
involved in an incident at the school and the effects of negative peer pressure. Parents may
become concerned about their children’s safety in school after hearing about the Journal of
American Medicine (Anderson et al., 2001) report on school related violence incidents. The
study linked 253 deaths to 220 incidents. Eighteen of the incidents resulted in multiple
homicides. Parents’ concern about negative peer pressure is well documented in articles in print
and on the internet. For example, in her article on negative peer pressure, Sandeen (2012)
highlights several areas of parental concern including skipping school, smoking, sex, drugs,
gangs, and alcohol.
In the NHES seventeen percent of parents indicated that the most important reason they
homeschool is their dissatisfaction with “academic instruction” (IESd, 2007). Some
homeschool families who are Christian fundamentalists object to what is taught in schools

5

(Klicka, 2006; Welner, 2002). Parents who began working with and educating their children as
infants and toddlers to provide an academic advantage may be concerned that their children will
be held back while learning in a stifling school environment. Many parents who homeschool
believe that their children will pursue learning independently, inventing projects and working at
their own pace. The learning in this type of homeschooling situation is often “individualistic,
independent, and self-directed” (Van Galen & Pitman, 1991). One concern parents mention is
how schools teach, rather than what they teach (Welner, 2002). Welner (2002) found that some
homeschooling parents believe that if they leave their children in public schools, their children
will be left behind with the inadequately funded, poor quality education they perceive as
happening at some public schools. Some parents may believe that if their children attended a
traditional school, the effects of the home environment of “at risk” students may have a negative
effect on their children (Wise Bauer & Wise, 2009; Perkins, 1992). Additionally, lack of
administrative support and the negative effects of peer socialization were considered in the top
eight motivational factors in Olsen’s study (2008).
The results of the NHES revealed that family time, finances, travel, and distance
accounted for 14 percent of families who homeschool their children (IESd, 2007). Some
families find homeschooling their children is more appropriate because they work in jobs that
demand that they move often (VanGalen, 1988). Homeschooling in the military is common
enough that the Department of Defense issued a policy on homeschooling to advise military
families (2002). In her blogged book, Tossed by the Fates, Moon (2012) offers advice to
military families as they move about the country and to overseas assignments. Some military
families consider homeschooling to help provide a feeling of continuity as they transfer from one
assignment to another. Olsen (2008) indicated that families are motivated by aspects of their

6

lives, such that “unique environmental needs of the family” were considered in the top eight
factors. Dobson (2000) wrote about children who had to travel and had nontraditional schedules
because they were athletes, artists, musicians, and others who are able to pursue their passions
and achieve academic success through homeschooling.
Seven percent of parents indicated an interest in providing their children with
nontraditional approaches to schooling (IESd, 2007). Some homeschoolers use a nontraditional
“unschooling” approach to educate their children. “Unschooling” offers a child an opportunity
to follow their educational interests and needs. Families who chose “unschooling” wanted their
children to benefit from self-directed learning without the constraints imposed by adult
instructors. “Unschooling” specifically left out ideology that traditional educators take for
granted like testing, having a well defined curriculum, setting benchmarks, and giving grades to
students (Holt, 1979). Homeschooled students have had opportunities to use project based
learning and experiential learning to enrich their life experiences. Homeschoolers may take
advantage of opportunities to volunteer in veterinarian offices, non-profit organizations, or take
college classes (Klicka, 2006).
Six percent of parents who homeschool their children indicated that their child’s health
problems or special needs was the reason they chose homeschooling (IESd, 2007). Some
families have had to resort to homeschooling due to the child’s immune deficiencies, cancer,
muscular dystrophy, or other long-term debilitating illnesses. Families choosing homeschooling
for their special needs children have cited their frustration with the special education process in
schools and the sometimes harsh environment created for special needs children and their
families (HSLDA, 2008). The fact that a child has special learning needs or disabilities was
found to be one of the top eight motivating factors in a study by Olsen (2008). The Home

7

School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA) (2008) says that parents of struggling learners or
children with special needs find unexpected benefits when they begin homeschooling their
children, such as being able to vary activities and accommodate their child so as to provide a
positive learning environment (LifeTips, 2012).

2.3 History and Growth of the Homeschooling Movement in the United States
Education has been important in the growth of America. As our nation was formed the
majority of American children were taught at home by parents or tutors. Puritan settlers
established America’s first public school in 1635 in Massachusetts (Boston.gov, 2011).
Beginning in the late 1700’s there was an immense amount of change in American education and
educational philosophies. Christians interested in spreading their religion through the
educational environment used their influence and pushed for schools that would be available to
all children. Massachusetts enacted a provision in 1780 that legislated that communities must
provide schooling for children (Cremin, 1980). In 1795, New York enacted legislation to
encourage schools, and then in 1814, ratified an updated legislation that created a system of
schools (Cremin, 1980). Noted textbook author Noah Webster served in the Massachusetts
legislature from 1815 to 1819. Webster continually urged his fellow legislators to establish a
system of schools funded by the state (Richman, 1995). In 1837, Horace Mann, in his position
as the first secretary of the Massachusetts State Board of Education, followed in Webster’s
footsteps and focused his efforts on the establishment of a State-run system of schools (Richman,
1995).
In the 1850’s schools expanded to educate all ages and types of children who were
previously schooled at home. Kindergarten classes were initiated for children aged five or six

8

and school districts began to open schools for disabled children (Cremin, 1980). High schools
emerged in Boston for students who wished to continue to learn in English, rather than the
traditional Latin. The new American high schools focused on preparing students for the
university, which had previously only been available to the wealthy students who attended
private preparatory high schools. Even with the improvement in schooling most children were
homeschooled until 1852, when a compulsory school law was passed in Massachusetts.
Between 1840 and 1870, the percentage of Caucasian children enrolled in school
increased from 38.4 percent to 61.1 percent. Funding for education in 1870 varied from state to
state, Georgia spent $1,250,299 on schooling with only 9 percent coming from public funds,
while Iowa was spending $3,347,629 with 94 percent derived from public funding (Cremin,
1980).
In 1880, resistance to the State-run school system, initiated by parents who were
educating their children at home brought out the militia to enforce the compulsory schooling
legislation in Barnstable, Massachusetts (Richman, 1995). In the late 1880’s labor focused on
expanding the nations’ schools with the goal of keeping children out of the workforce and
increasing wages for men (Peterson, 1985, Gaither, 2008). A strong campaign by labor leaders,
between 1907 and 1911, produced legislation enabling San Francisco to enforce compulsory
education (Peterson, 1985). A bigger fight by labor was won in the south after middle-class
reform groups helped push for elimination of child labor and enacted compulsory schooling
legislation. In addition to advancing the spread of schools nationwide, labor’s influence helped
lengthen the school year to 144 days (Gaither, 2008).
Parents in the early 1900’s were prompted to move their children out of homeschooling
and into public or private schools due to new compulsory school laws. The parent’s ability to

9

educate their children in the traditional way by teaching them at home was being challenged by
updated views of parenting and childrearing, which were based upon a new theory of
specialization. In the theory of specialization, parents were told that each individual had a sphere
of competence in that they were qualified to work and if they were not teachers, they were not
qualified to teach their children (Mcalister-Kizzier, 2009). In addition to the theory of
specialization, parents were convinced by researchers that an individual’s income increases in
proportion to the years he or she completes in high school (Gaither, 2008).
The Catholic Church was the major opponent to the expansion of compulsory schooling
in defense of the Parochial school system, whose growth had been fueled by the influx of
immigrants in inner city neighborhoods (Peterson, 1985, Gaither, 2008). By the early 20th
century all states had passed measures legislating compulsory education, with the final
enactment coming from Oregon that passed the Compulsory Education Act on November 7,
1922 (Katz, 1976, Gathercole, 2007). The passage of the Act was fueled by anti-Catholicism
and the fear that private school attendance would create separatism, dissention, and discord
between children of different religions. The Compulsory Education Act required nearly every
child between the ages of eight and sixteen to attend public school (Gathercole, 2007, Pierce v
Society of Sisters, 1925). This final act was almost immediately contested by two schools. The
two established schools, one a private religious institution, the other a private for-profit school,
fought the legislation all the way to the Supreme Court. Their case was based upon their belief
that the legislation was contrary to the Fourteenth Amendment of the Unites States Constitution
(Pierce v Society of Sisters, 1925). Initially, the federal District Court decided that the Due
Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment was violated by the Compulsory Education Act.
Then upon appeal, the Supreme Court found that the parents’ right to bring up their children and

10

direct their education had been interfered with by the enactment of the Compulsory Education
Act. The court also found that the Compulsory Education Act interfered with the plaintiffs’
business and that it could cause the destruction of the business and property of the schools. The
Supreme Court decision included a provision that the state had the authority to require that
children attend some school and that schools educate students in a manner designed so that
“certain studies plainly essential to good citizenship … be taught … and that nothing be taught
that is manifestly inimical to the public welfare” (Yudolf, 1979, p. 869).
The shift to compulsory schooling was not without controversy; along with religious
private and for-profit schools fighting for their right to educate students, some parents went to
court to protect the right to educate their children at home. Some of the court cases that
coincided with the beginning of compulsory education decided that the state could not require
children to attend public school and explicitly allowed private schooling. Other court decisions
declared homeschooling illegal, while other decisions did not prohibit parents from educating
their children at home (Gaither, 2008, Klicka, 2006). The relatively few children who were
homeschooled during the late 19th through the mid 20th century were those students who were
very transient; whose families traveled extensively, were stationed abroad, or lived in remote
areas.
In the depression era of the 1930’s, American men had difficulty finding work, which
influenced youth to begin attending and staying in school longer (Gaither, 2008). Between 1930
and 1950, the percentage of children attending school rose from just under 50 percent to over 77
percemt, and the school year lengthened to 178 days (Gaither, 2008). In the mid 20th century, a
resurgence of homeschooling began because some families believed that the school environment
was too conservative and stifled their children’s learning opportunities (Lines, 2000). The

11

fledgling enthusiasm for educating children at home did not go unpunished. In 1958, a father in
California was convicted of truancy for educating his son at home, even though his son had
progressed from fourth grade to ninth grade curriculum in only 18 months (Somerville, 2003).
As more parents investigated home education in the 1960’s as part of the antiestablishment movement, some educators began to study the effects of keeping a child home to
be educated. After writing How Children Fail (1964) and helping to lead nationwide educational
reform in the 1960’s, John Holt became a proponent of “Unschooling,” a type of homeschooling
aimed at allowing a child freedom to learn. He believed that school was a good idea gone
wrong, and that meaningful school reform was impossible (Mother Earth News, 1980, Farenga,
2003, Lines, 2000). Due to the poor publicity schools were getting and in an attempt to provide
stronger educational opportunities for schools in low-income areas, Title I, Part A of the
Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) was ratified in 1965. In 1967, the term
“homeschooling” was first used to describe parents educating their children at home, and New
Jersey courts ruled that homeschooling satisfied the requirement for education of children under
the compulsory schooling legislation (Somerville, 2003). During the 1960’s and early 1970’s
homeschooling families were rare and did not have very much opportunity to collaborate with
other families (Somerville, 2003).
During the 1970’s politically charged climate, legislated school integration prompted
“white-flight” that had many families moving to the suburbs. Resistance to school district
bussing programs spawned racial unrest and youth violence (VTNA, 1971, McKeon, 2007).
Many families began reexamining their children’s attendance at the local public school.
Fundamentalist Christians were concerned about what their children were learning, believing that
school districts had made certain liberal curricular choices that did not align with their beliefs

12

(Isenberg, 2007, Gaither, 2008). Other families viewed school district curriculum as weak and
therefore opted for homeschooling as a way to raise the level of education for their children
(Isenberg, 2007). When families examined options other than traditional public schools, many
families began choosing homeschooling rather than magnet, private or parochial schools.
Families who had chosen homeschooling were encouraged when a United States Department of
Education employee and well-known educational author, Raymond Moore, wrote that children
should not begin school until they were 8 or 10 years old (Moore & Moore, 1975). He later
expanded on his views emphasizing that children schooled at home are successful. Even well
known 1970’s television talk show host, Phil Donahue, suggested that homeschooling was viable
choice for children (Gaither, 2008).
When homeschooling began to grow in the 1980’s, educators did not expect that numbers
would grow to more than one percent of the total United States population of school aged
children. In 1983, the National Commission on Excellence in Education issued A Nation at Risk
following an eighteen month study that focused on our nation’s secondary schools. The study
found that our nation’s schools were being eroded by a tide of mediocrity (Bell, 1983, Scherer,
2004). The findings of the study paralleled the dissatisfaction felt by many parents regarding
their children’s education. At the same time, many parents were becoming increasingly
concerned about the safety of their children in the school setting (Bielick, Chandler &
Broughman, 2001). Believing that public schools had become too liberal in the early 1980’s,
many Christian parents found themselves at odds with traditional public schools who in many
cases viewed homeschooled children as truants (Lines, 2000, Isenberg, 2007).
Several activists assisted the new and prospective homeschooling families in their search
for excellence in home education. Parents were encouraged by John Holt to keep their children

13

out of school and that “learning is living” in his book Teach Your Own: A Hopeful Path to
Education (1981). Raymond Moore expanded his advice to homeschoolers by writing more
books filled with tidbits on how to homeschool children, what to expect from your children as
you educate them at home, and legal advice for parents (1984, 1985).
Homeschooling families emerged as a special interest group and focused attention on
legislators through email alerts and good organizational skills. Families and high powered
business people overwhelmed the law makers who began to formulate homeschool friendly laws
(Gaither, 2008, Klicka, 2006). Such political efforts energized the fledgling homeschool
movement and gave it vitality and strength to move ahead.
The laws governing homeschooling changed quickly possibly due in part to the fact that
homeschoolers are interested in deregulation, as opposed to greater regulation (Klicka, 2006).
By the mid 1980’s, most states accepted homeschooling as a legitimate form of schooling and
revised their compulsory school laws. Much of the growth of homeschooling in the United
States is due to the fact that legislation regarding how children are schooled has changed over the
past forty years due to the political pressure from homeschooling parents (Klicka, 2006). At the
same time states have upped the requirements and outcomes in traditional schools and legislators
have given parents more choice in directing their children’s learning opportunities (Gaither,
2008). Many religious homeschoolers believed that they were successful in moving the
legislature to enact new laws and repeal laws that were against homeschooling through the grace
of God (Gaither, 2008, Klicka, 2006).
Since its inception in 1983, the Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA) has
been a major force in the legal struggles of homeschoolers and has continually lobbied the
legislature on the behalf of homeschoolers. The HSLDA is the brain child of homeschooling

14

lawyers, Michael Ferris and Michael Smith. The HSLDA called attention to the fact that while
most states required children to attend school through compulsory education laws, the laws did
not specify what type of school. Unequal enforcement of the regulations in some states prodded
homeschoolers to go to court to protect their right to teach their children at home ( Klicka, 2006).
Homeschool activist attorney and author, Christopher Klicka attributed the growth of
homeschooling to a resurgence of parents responding to God’s calling to educate their children
with a biblical worldview (in response to Deuteronomy 6:7, “You shall teach them [God’s
principles] diligently to your sons and shall talk of them when you sit in your house and when
you walk by the way and when you lie down and when you rise up”). In his work as an attorney
for the Home School Legal Defense Association, Klicka spent thousands of hours working with
parents, eager to follow what they understood as their Christian commitment, fighting together
with other homeschooling families against the anti-homeschooling legislation and local school
district policies (Klicka, 2006). Milton Gaither (2008), associate professor of education at
Messiah College and author of Homeschool: An American History, wrote that there was an
ideological shift in the 1990’s as homeschooling went from being underground and radical to
mainstream. By 1993, in response to pressure by homeschooling families, all 50 states had
legalized homeschooling (Ray, 2011).
Christian speaker and founder of “Focus on the Family,” James Dobson said, “The great
advantage of home schooling, in fact, is the protection it provides to vulnerable children from the
wrong kind of socialization.” He goes on to expound on the limitless options available for
children who are homeschooled (Dobson, 2000). Homeschoolers routinely belong to
cooperative groups which specialize in educational enhancements including art, music, poetry,
and Advanced Placement courses. They also have the opportunity to attend academic

15

competitions and participate in sports with other homeschoolers. Several of the past top
qualifiers in the National Geography Bee (five percent) and Scripps Spelling Bee (twelve
percent) have been homeschooled (HSDLA, May 30, 2003).
In response to concern regarding the nation’s schools, President Bush (1991) met with the
governors in Virginia for an Education Summit producing America 2000: An Education Strategy
and laying the foundation for Goals 2000. Goals 2000 was later passed under the Clinton
Administration in 1994 (Austin, 2004). One of the goals, often echoed by parents who have
chosen to homeschool their children, addressed the fact that only 50 percent of students felt safe
in their own high schools (Anderson, 2001).
Violence in schools has continued to increase the level of concern for many families.
From 1994 to 1999, the Journal of American Medicine reports there were 253 documented
school deaths related to 220 school violence incidents (Anderson, 2001). These statistics, along
with an increase of bullying in schools, have underscored the need for a safe environment for the
education of our nation’s children (Nansel, Overpeck, Pilla, Ruan, Simons-Morton, & Scheidt,
2001). While trust in America’s schools to take care of our children and provide a safe
environment has been eroded due to the violence, proponents of homeschooling have promoted
the safety and advantages of homeschooling (Kagan, 2008, Dobson, 2000).
Parents’ level of concern for their school-aged children is at an all time high in the United
States despite the well publicized documented improvement models including No Child Left
Behind 2001 (Public law 107-110, 2002), and Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA) 2004.
On January 8, 2002, President Bush signed legislation reauthorizing the Elementary and
Secondary Education Act (1965) as the No Child Left Behind Act, thereby forcing improvement
initiatives and increasing accountability for schools. Public schools have exhibited lack-luster

16

performance and have been slow to initiate government dictated school improvement (Bloom,
2011, Izumi, 2009). Failed attempts to improve schools and poor learning environments have
encouraged a move by many families to homeschooling (Bielick et al., 2001, Klicka, 2006).

2.4 Characteristics of Homeschooled Children
Much has been made about the characteristics of homeschooled students and their
families, including the most popular age to homeschool, the percentage of white students, the
socioecomic status of homeschool families, and the education of parents who homeschool
Proponents believe that effective homeschooling may take place at any age. The largest numbers
of homeschooled students are kindergarteners (Bielick, Chandler, & Broughman, 2001). The
percentage of students being homeschooled in the balance of the grades, first through twelfth, is
similar (Bielick et al., 2001). Based upon the National Home Education Research Institute
survey we know that the percentage of white students who participated in homeschooling was
higher than other races at 91.7 percent and has increased from 2 percent to 3.9 percent of the
total population of students in the U.S. since 1999 (Toppo, 2009). Researchers have reviewed
the socioeconomic status of families who homeschool and found that 66.8 percent of families
earn less than $75,000 and more than $25,001 a year (ICESd, 2007). In 1999, the NHES survey
program found that 17 percent of homeschool families had an income above $75,000. By 2007
the results rose to 33 percent (ICESd, 2007). The 2008 NHERI survey found on average,
families who homeschool have a higher level of education than the general population: 67.3
percent of fathers and 62.5 percent of mothers have a bachelor’s degree or higher (Ray, 2009).
Out of the total population that the NHES surveyed, the proportion of college educated parents

17

who homeschool their children is 6.8 percent, up from 4.9 percent in 1999 (Toppo, 2009, IESd,
2007).
When reviewing family structure, researchers have found that 89 percent of
homeschooled children are from two-parent households (IESa, 2007). Sixty-eight percent of
home school families have three or more children (Ray, 2003). Fifty-four percent of families
who homeschool their children have only one parent in the workforce. The highest numbers of
students who are homeschooled live in the Midwest: 61,900 students. The highest percentages
of students who are homeschooled in the United States live in the cities (IESc, 2001). The
biggest growth in homeschooling is in the southwest (Gaither, 2008).
Although there are numerous statistics on the characteristics of students and families who
do and do not opt to homeschool their children, we do not know the extent to that those
characteristics factor into the decision-making process of families who consider homeschooling.
It may be that many different types of families are more likely to consider homeschooling at all,
or it may be that many different types of families conclude that they will indeed follow through
once they begin to entertain the idea. Issues of unequal access to resources and information
could be critical turning points in the decision-making process, making homeschooling feasible
for some families and not others, despite equal interest in homeschooling across family types. If
this is the case, then failing to understand and address these critical points of inequality could
further propagate the divide between the haves and the have-nots in American society.

2.5 Decision-Making
The term decision-making indicates a cognitive process during which an individual or
group of individuals evaluate the present options by gathering possibilities and probabilities that

18

are before them, then choose a pathway from among several alternative scenarios and finally
make a definitive choice (Simon, 1960, Langley, Mintzberg, Pitcher, Posada, and Saint-Macary,
1995). Each individual or group of individuals incorporates various strategies and techniques
when they go through a decision-making process. Often a decision-making process is direct,
almost immediate seemingly without any conceptual framework; in other instances the process is
expanded and lengthy, incorporating identifiable tools such as critical thinking techniques while
including pressure from various societal, educational and intellectual considerations (Rest,
Narvaez, Bebeau, & Thoma, 1999, Simon, 1960).
When studying decision-making in families as it pertained to the life-changing choice of
the purchase of a home, Klepper and Gronhaug (2009) stated that organizational decisionmaking is not fundamentally different than decisions made by families and although families do
not usually have formal business meetings around their dining room table, they may assimilate
the traits, objectives, and characteristics of a small organization. Klepper and Gronhaug (2009)
applied decision-making philosophies from management to the families in their study. Some of
their philosophical basis was built on Langley et al. (1995) who argue that in an organizational
decision-making process it is difficult to ascertain the beginning and end of a decision, as well as
determine the logical basis and pathway of the decision. As Klepper and Gronhaug (2009)
incorporated Langley’s et al. (1995) organizational decision-making process by applying it to
families, they found that one area of a family’s decision-making process is essentially tied to
decisions in other areas. Due to the linkage and interconnections of the family’s life-style,
interests, and personal preferences, as the family is presented with a new period in their life and
the decisions that are nested within that period of responsibility, they move into an era of
deductive decision-making (Klepper & Gronhaug, 2009).

19

As the explosion of homeschooling has erupted, a number of questions have arisen about
this trend that takes families back to the educational roots of the country. Yet while the history
of homeschooling is well documented and there is plenty written about parental choice, there has
been very little research on the decision-making process that parents go through when they
choose to leave traditional neighborhood schools for homeschooling (Center for Educational
Reform, 2009; Gaither, 2008; McKeon, 2007). Decision-making regarding homeschooling has
primarily been addressed in two key contributions to the literature. First, while comparing
burnout in homeschooling mothers to schoolteacher burnout, Lois (2006) examined the timing of
the decision to homeschool. Lois found that some parents make the decision to homeschool
prior to having children, other parents reviewed options for their children approaching school
age, and still other parents decided to begin homeschooling while their children were attending
public or private schools. In a second study, Hall (2007) conducted research in DeKalb County
Georgia on factors that influence parents’ decision-making process. She found that “the goal of
homeschooling was to provide a successful education for children by applying a warm and
loving environment, which fostered closeness and parental participation.” While part of her
research focuses on and discusses decision-making, it ignores the process through which parents
traverse when deciding to begin or discontinue homeschooling.

2.6 Decision-Making Theories
“The essence of ultimate decision remains impenetrable to the observer – often indeed to
the decider himself… There will always be the dark and tangled stretches in the decision making
process – mysterious to those who may be most intimately involved” (John Fitzgerald Kennedy,
quoted in Allison, 1971, preface).
Early decision-making theory was introduced by Bernoulli in 1738, reintroduced by John
Dewey (1910), and placed at the center of executive function by Barnard in 1938. Simon (1960)
20

expounded on Barnard’s research by discussing the prolonged, multifaceted process which
precedes the final choice. Since then many researchers have studied the ways decisions are
made, and as President Kennedy mentioned, there are “mysterious”, interwoven, and “tangled”
pieces to many decisions (Allison, 1971). This study has reviewed and evaluated two models of
decision-making that are integrated to provide a holistic framework for the analysis of decisionmaking.
The initial model by Paton (2007) features three main time periods in the decisionmaking process: before the decision, the decision, and after the decision. In my study I have
intertwined Paton’s before the decision time-period with six multifaceted, complex, unique
choice processes that include various rational factors, logical steps, and pressures as presented by
Langley, Mintzberg, Pitcher, Posada, and Saint-Macary in 1995 (Davis, 1973; Lipham, 1981;
Dunstan, 1981; Rankin, 1981; Lipham & Rankin, 1982). The deductive empirical research on
family decision-making by Klepper and Gronhaug (2009) and their agreement with Langley’s et
al. (1995) model set the basis for my use of Langley’s et al. (1995) decision-making model. I
have taken the model a step further and used the totality of Langley’s et al. (1995) six decisionmaking processes as a scaffold for my study. The six pathways in the model included steps
during which evidence was gathered and interpreted through a lens made up of personal
perceptions, assumptions, and experiences and was labeled as sequential, anarchical, iterative
sequence, convergent, insightful, and linkages (Payne, 2003; Lipham & Rankin, 1982; Langley
et al., 1995). By using Langley’s et al. (1995) pathways I was able to discriminate on the
differences between the families’ decision-making process by focusing on the intricacies of their
pathways. In Figure 2.1 below, I present a graphic representation to illustrate the six decisionmaking processes.

21

Figure 2.1. Decision-Making Process Pictorial Representation

For interpretation of
the references to
color in this and all
other figures, the
reader is referred to
the electronic version
of this dissertation.

The sequential process [Figure 2.1, line A] is focused on “intelligence, design and
choice” (Langley et al., 1995, p263). Families who use the sequential model have a narrow,
research-based focused process made up of rational stages that may include the reduction of
various thoughts into identification and definition of their interest in homeschooling, the
suggestion of homeschool options, evaluation of the alternatives, the actual decision choice,

22

implementation of the decision to homeschool and the evaluation of the decision to homeschool
(Lipham & Hoeh, 1974, Langley et al., 1995).
The “anarchical” [Figure 2.1, line B] decision-making model embodies inconsistent
thoughts that provide the impetus to move the decision along various chaotic avenues and paths,
which eventually tumble randomly into a choice (Langley et al., 1995). The randomness and
true anarchy of thought in this model makes it difficult for the family to evaluate the alternatives
available. Some of the pressures that hamper and confuse their pathway to the end choice are
socio-economic, friends and family, gender, ethnicity, cultural ideology, values, habits, external
expectations, past learning and life experiences, along with religious beliefs (Paton, 2007;
Bloomer & Hodkinson, 1997; Kessler, 2000). As an individual moves through the decisionmaking process Payne (2003) commented that some decisions are made through a process whose
primary objective is avoiding negative outcomes. When the final decision is made it may seem
as though the actual decision is so understated, that it is difficult to identify when the decision is
completed (Lipham & Rankin, 1982).
The third model, “iterative sequence” begins similar to the first [Figure 2.1, line C] and is
designed to be a theoretical half-way point between sequential and anarchical decision-making
(Langley et al., 1995). Families go through some chaos and distractions similar to the anarchical
model as they move along the iterative sequence pathway, but rather than all of the twists and
turns incorporated in the anarchical process, this pathway, while filled with zigs and zags, is
smoother and somewhat more managed. This model is characterized by a somewhat organized,
but messy emotionally challenged process filled with divergence that slows the momentum to the
final choice (Langley et al., 1995).

23

Families who faced the process and found themselves at the mercy of an element of
chaos, integrated with sudden curves and turning points before focusing in on the decision point
were classified as working through the “convergence” model [Figure 2.1, line D] (Langley et al.,
1995). The convergence model unfolds from the initiation of the idea beginning with a family
thinking about homeschooling, with the families steadily little by little focusing on the final
decision. The convergence pathway, while similar to the iterative decision-making process in
some ways, differs in a foundational basis regarding the underlying positive emotional feeling
towards the idea of homeschooling. However, the families in the convergence process still found
themselves tightly bound by a model which holds areas of distinct, discrete and tangible concrete
phenomena that are considered in a responsive environment based upon culture, beliefs,
opinions, and experience as the options are narrowed towards the final choice (Langley et al.,
1995).
Families who move through the process with some elements of chaos, emotion and
indecision, integrated with researching, talking to others, reading information on the internet,
emailing current homeschoolers, thinking about the pros and cons of homeschooling and viewing
optional programs, may fit into the fifth model of decision-making that is termed “insightful”
[Figure 2.1, line E]. The “insightful” model is similar to the fourth model, with additional
specific points of “insight” when families hear something or read something that helps to narrow
their focus in an environment bounded by the view of possibilities and the determination of
personal costs and benefits when coming to a conclusion that results in a choice (Paton, 2007;
Langley et al., 1995).
Families who find themselves facing more than one decision as they consider
homeschooling their child may follow the “linkages” model [Figure 2.1, line F] (Langley et al.,

24

1995). The “linkages” model is representative of families who are making decisions regarding
the same concern that become interconnected over time (sequential linkages). As families
evaluate the educational status of their children, they may find that ramifications include the
need to make a decision regarding, for example, the status of their professional lives or their
socio-economic status. These ramifications were termed lateral linkages and were associated
with parallel decisions and precursive linkages that were decisions made on one topic that effects
potential decisions on other matters (e.g. in this case decision A alters the path of decision B)
(Langley et al., 1995). This decision-making process is depicted as being a multifaceted,
intertwined, complex, ever-changing process through which several decisions are made
concurrently, and the steps are interlaced together such that it may make it difficult, even
impossible, to determine that steps lead to that decision (Langley et al., 1995).
Due to the effort involved in gathering information and evaluating the pros and cons
during the before time period, moving through one of the six pathways, the actual decision may
not be exciting or memorable. After the decision is made to homeschool, the families involved
begin endeavoring to gather materials and make arrangements for their child’s learning
environment similar to the ones outlined by their thought process during the decision-making
process (Rankin, 1981). For parents who have discontinued homeschooling, the combined
model offers the time after the decision, along with the subsequent time period to be
reconsidered as the second before period, and the decision to stop homeschooling as a secondary
decision.
Decision-making is broken up into multiple stages, characterized by change, confusion
and anarchy of thought while focusing on logical and rational steps, along with pressure from
various stakeholders (Paton, 2007; Lipham, 1981; Langley et al., 1995). Parents have an

25

emotional connection with the ultimate decision (Aldous, Condon, Hill, Straus, & Tallman,
1971). Reiss & Oliveri (1980) found similarities between stressful decision-making in the
corporate organizational world and the family organization. They found that decisions were
sometimes made on a temporary basis (Reiss & Oliveri, 1971). In the case of this study, the
temporary decision to homeschool their children was revealed by the fact that all of the parents
indicated that they reviewed their decision on a yearly basis. By using an integrated approach
including points from both educational and organizational decision-making, the study benefited
from the availability of the blend of philosophies. As the study progressed, it was important to
keep various stages, steps, and strategies available from the two theories for the ultimate
deciphering of the parents’ processes as they move through their decision-making journey,
finalizing in the ultimate goal of deciding whether to begin or discontinue homeschooling their
children.

2.7 Research Questions
Homeschooling is not new to America. Most children were homeschooled until about
200 years ago, when compulsory schooling was initiated, and children began spending days
learning in school, rather than with their mothers (Gathercole, 2007). As the explosion of
homeschooling has erupted in recent years, a number of questions have arisen about this trend
back to the educational roots of the country. After a review of the literature, the following gaps
in the existing knowledge have been identified, such that this research was guided by two
overarching questions:


What process do parents go through when making the decision to begin or discontinue
homeschooling their children?

26



What circumstances precipitate a parent’s decision to move their children to homeschool
or to end homeschooling?

27

CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY
This study used interviews to investigate the process parents went through when making
the decision to begin or discontinue homeschooling their children. This research reviewed the
recollections of parents regarding the events and conversations leading up to and surrounding
their decision to begin homeschooling or discontinue homeschooling their children. When
studying family decisions memories make up the records of the process leading to the eventual
choice (Weick, 1971).

3.1 Sample Selection
1

I interviewed one or two parents from fourteen families [Table 3.1 ] who have
homeschooled their children in order to discover and describe the information regarding parents’
choices concerning homeschooling (Auerbach & Silverstein, 2003). I chose interviewees who
have experienced homeschooling (Rubin & Rubin, 2005).
Table 3.1 Introduction to Families and the Grade Their Child Began Homeschooling

Mom

Child (begin HS) Child (HS)

Katrina

Devon

Jonathan (K)

Allen (K)

Chrystal David
Hannah Justin

Camile (PK)
Larry (PK)

Lindy

Ken

Alexandra (1+)

Mindy

Jeremy

Brian (K)

Jessica

Evan

Ellen (PK)

Isaiah (K)
Jason (K)
Michelle
(PK)
Samantha
(K)
Lynette
(PK)

Connie
1

Dad

Josh

Amos (6)

Andrea (6)

Pseudonyms were used for all participants
28

Child (HS) Child (HS)
Gessica
Simon (K) (NA)
Georgia
(K)
Julia (K)

Child
(HS)

Brooklyn
(NA)

Tim (PK)

Alex (PK)
Jacob (6)

Marilyn
(8)

Fred (1+)

Table 3.1 (cont’d)

Connie
June
Debbie
Tina
Janice
Julica
Karis

Josh
Marcus
Don
Tom
Bradford
Steve
Herb

continued
Emma (PK)
Sally (3)
Liam (PK)
Kelly (6+)
Norah (K)
Holden (9)

Randie

Brice

Ronald (1)

Emily
(NA)

Isaiah (1)
Owen (K)
Grayson (K) Declan (1)
Noah (PK)
Aden (PK)
Jack (4)
Julia (K)
Caleb (K)
Anne (2)
Colton
Brielle (K)
(NA)

Grace (PK)
Blake (K)

The sample, a subset of the population of those in mid-Michigan who homeschool their
children, were not selected at random; rather I used convenience sampling and snowball
sampling approaches. Convenience sampling allowed me to use a sample that was easily
accessible. The snowball sampling approach, which has also been referred to as chain or referral
sampling, allowed me to access people who were in the close knit or hidden homeschooling
population, and capitalized on social knowledge gained from those within the homeschooling
population (Bowers, 2011; Auerbach & Silverstein, 2003).
I used an initial convenience sample of ten families combined with a snowball sampling
method to reach the full sample size of fourteen families. I targeted individuals for the initial
interviews by emailing and calling them (Auerbach & Silverstein, 2003). The families in the
convenience sample were people who were within my network of contacts within the midMichigan Christian community. During the research and interview process I was serving as the
superintendent of a well respected prekindergarten through twelfth grade Christian school in a
fairly large city in mid-Michigan. In addition to life-long contacts I have made in the Christian
community in mid-Michigan, my affiliation with the Christian school gave me an opportunity for
people to be confident in opening up and speaking about their experience from their hearts.

29

During the interview, I asked the interviewee if he or she could recommend other
homeschooling parents whom I could contact. I was able to obtain four homeschooling
interviews through the snowball referrals. The convenience sample represented thirty-three
children who were homeschooled by their parents. Nine additional children were represented by
the four families in the snowball group. Each family in the snowball group was recommended
by one family in the convenience sample [arrows indicate recommendation as shown in Figure
3.2]. Some of those in the convenience sample also recommended others for interviews, but the
referred individuals were unable or unwilling to participate in the study.
Table 3.2 Disclosure of Convenience and Snowball Sample Interviewees
Convenience Sample
Katrina
Chrystal
Hannah
Jessica
Connie & Josh
June & Marcus
Tina
Julica
Debbie
Janice

Related Snowball Sample
Lindy & Ken
Mindy

Karis
Randie

There were forty-two children from the fourteen families in the study who began
homeschooling. Of the forty-two children, there were twenty-one children from eight families
who discontinued homeschooling at a later point in time. Of those twenty-one children who
discontinued homeschooling, two children from two different families who were homeschooled
and switched to private Christian school, then left their school to return to homeschooling once
again. Out of those two children, one child subsequently left homeschooling to attend
community college during his senior year of high school. While the goal was to include at least
three families that have discontinued homeschooling for at least one child, I ended up

30

interviewing eight families who had at least one child discontinue homeschooling. While my
goal was to interview the parent (mother) who homeschooled the children, in three families the
fathers also participated in the interview. In Table 3.2, the interviews which included the fathers
are indicated by stating both the name of the father and the mother. No children were
interviewed.

3.2 Introduction to the Families
In this section I present a description of the families that includes family size, the type of
environment where the interview took place, whether the children were present during the
interview, the year of school when the child began homeschooling, the primary teacher’s area of
expertise, and the highest degree earned by the parent who conducts the home education of their
children.
The parents interviewed in the study had children aged two to twenty-four. Families in
the research study lived in various communities in mid-Michigan and consisted of between two
and seven children and had homeschooled between two and six children [as depicted in Figure
3.1].
Figure 3.1 Frequency of Number of Children Homeschooled per Family
Six Children
7%

Two Children
43%

Four Children
21%

Three Children
29%

31

I interviewed mothers who were the main home educator of their children. In two cases,
the fathers participated in the full-length of the interview and in one case the father arrived home
and participated for approximately ten minutes during the middle of the interview. The
interviews [Figure 3.2] took place in a restaurant, my office, during a homeschool outdoor
education camping experience, or the home of the family. The interviews that took place in the
families’ home were predominately at the dining room table. One home based interview took
place in the living room and one took place in the kitchen while the mother was baking cookies.
Figure 3.2 Location of Interview

My Office
15%

Restaurant
23%

Camp
16%
Home
46%

During the interview with the parents, some of the children were not present, some were
present part of the time, and some of the children were present during the full length of the
interview in the same general area in their home, but were not involved in the interview. Of the
children who were present part of the time during the interview, most of them were present
32

because the interview took place at their dining room table and they wanted a snack or other item
from their parent. One of the interviews took place in the kitchen of a home while the mother
prepared cookies for her family and one of the interviews took place in the living room of a
home. One of the interviews that took place at a restaurant began while the mother’s children
were eating with my husband in an adjacent booth and continued while he took them on the other
side of a glass wall to the play area. A visual description of the interview locations is available
in Figure 3.3.
Figure 3.3 Presence of Children During the Interview

Full-time
7%

Not-present
50%

Part-time
43%

The fourteen families interviewed in the research had a total number of forty-two
children who were involved in homeschooling. One of the children included in the study was an
eighteen month old preschooler who was currently involved in an intentional homeschooling
course and was classified by his mom as being homeschooled.

33

Figure 3.4 Frequency of Initial Grade for Homeschooling
Eighth-plus
2%

Fourth
2%

Ninth
2%

Sixth-plus
2%
Sixth
7%

PK
26%

Third
3%
Second
3%

First-plus
5%
First
7%

Kindergarten
41%

Four of the families had preschool children who were not considered as being home educated
because their parents were not intentionally homeschooling them. As I reviewed the initial grade
that parents began homeschooling [as seen in Figure 3.4], I considered the intentionality of the
parent. Some of the parents began unintentionally working with their children as toddlers, but
did not indicate that they were actually working through preschool curriculum. The largest
group of parents began intentionally homeschooling their children in kindergarten. Two of the
children who began homeschooling during first grade are labeled “First-plus” due to the
students’ exit from a traditional school setting and initially beginning homeschooling during their
first grade school year. A similar description, “Sixth-plus” and “Eighth-plus” was applied to
students who began homeschooling during their sixth and eighth grade school years.
When looking at the parent who does the greatest amount of the homeschooling, I found
that the mothers in this study were the home educator. While in the overall family, the father’s
34

field of expertise is important, I focused on the mothers’ field of expertise since they were
teaching their children day-in and day-out. I defined the field of expertise as the field in which
the mother received her college training. In each case, the mother’s original field of work was
also congruent with the field in which she received her college training. As I reviewed the area
of expertise or the field of their highest college degree of the mother I found that there were eight
different degree fields represented by those interviewed in the study. The largest field of
expertise is business, which includes accounting, marketing, and human resources [Figure 3.5].
Figure 3.5 Homeschool Educator’s Field of Expertise
Exercise Science
7%

Teacher
15%

Computer
Technology
14%
Business
29%
Sociology
7%

Social Work
14%

Engineer

Chemist
7%

7%

In the study it was obvious that education was extremely important to the families. All of
the parents from the families in the research study had attended college. In one family both
parents had earned a PhD and in another family, the mother was pursuing her PhD when she had
her first child and then remained at home with her new baby. At the time of the study, she was
not planning on finishing her PhD due to the time commitment of homeschooling. When
35

reviewing the highest degree attained by the homeschool educators I found that when I
considered only the parent who was the home educator, they all had earned a minimum of an
associate’s degree and one parent possessed a PhD [as depicted in Figure 3.6].
Figure 3.6 Highest Degree Attained by the Predominate Homeschool Educator
Ph.D.
7%

Associate's
Degree
14%

Master's Degree
29%
Bachelor's
Degree
50%

3.3 Data Collection
The convenience sample was made up of families who were in my network of contacts.
A couple of the interviewees were in my environment but not well known to me. The interviews
were arranged by phone calls, letters, and emails to the homeschooled families. The initial
phone call included a brief introduction of the project, a description of the way the interviewer
obtained the interviewee’s name and contact information, explanation of next steps, and
scheduling of a contact visit if desired by the interviewee (Seidman, 2006). Initial phone calls
were followed-up with an email, detailing the desire for an interview (see letter Appendix A).
Consent forms were included with the follow-up email (see consent form Appendix B). On
arrival to the interview I reviewed the consent form with the interviewee.
Regardless of how interviewees were identified for potential participation, I made all
contacts with the interviewees myself (Seidman, 2006). Following the initial email, I sent a

36

second follow-up email three or four days later. In the second follow-up email, I thanked the
interviewees for agreeing to an interview and suggested possible times, dates, and locations for
the interview. At that time the interview and location was scheduled. For a couple of the
interviews, I spoke to the wife on the phone or in person to schedule the interview. For a couple
of more hesitant potential interviewees, I offered to schedule a contact visit to help the
interviewees feel more comfortable with the interview process (Seidman, 2006). In the end it
was not necessary to schedule a contact visit. In three cases, I conducted an impromptu contact
visit when I saw the potential interviewee at their church.
Basic tenants of family decision-making led me to use interviews to uncover elements of
the processes because previous research studies had determined that “the best traces of…
(family) decision processes are therefore in the minds of the decision makers” (Klepper and
Gronhaug, 2009, p169). I carefully designed the questions to elicit the information that to
correlate with my research questions (Creswell, 1994). Purposeful questioning helped to elicit a
description of the decision-making process (see the interview protocol in Appendix C). I also
used follow up questions to further illuminate the decision-making process.
Due to the focused nature of the recruitment of interview subjects I asked follow up
questions to clarify the concepts that were unearthed in the interview. Concept clarification
helped to define terms that were specialized or shared among homeschooling parents (Rubin &
Rubin, 2005). I also used responsive interviewing to interact with the families. Responsive
interviewing is a descriptive phrase for the interviewing technique in that the interviewer
responds to the answers given, rather than only asking scripted questions (Rubin & Rubin, 2005).
The interview was made up of topical questions with clarifying questions and responsive
follow-up questions (Appendix C). The questions were open-ended, designed to determine the

37

process the families went through when they decided to begin or discontinue homeschooling
their children. I listened carefully to the participant and explored essential ideas, words, and
themes due to its essential nature to the research analysis (Rubin & Rubin, 2005). For parents
who had discontinued homeschooling their child or children I followed up the initial interview
questions with the final group of questions, along with responsive interview questions. This
section included open-ended questions with the goal of uncovering the process the family used to
decide to discontinue homeschooling. During the course of the interview I inquired to determine
demographic information regarding the age and grade of the children, which parent, or other
adult, conducted most of the homeschooling, the parent’s educational background, cooperative
schooling programs the children participate in, and the length of time the family had
homeschooled their children.
Following the interview, I filed the consent form and interview protocol, including any
additional notes, copied and labeled the digital recording of the interview, and transcribed
journal entries (Seidman, 2006). In between interviews, prior to beginning the formal data
analysis, I replayed and reviewed the interviews mentally, thinking about the meaning of
statements and the importance of antidotal facts (Seidman, 2006). The confidential interviews
were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed. Names and identifying characteristics of the
interviewees were not associated with the interview results. I kept a journal to record postinterview thoughts, impressions and considerations.

3.4 Data Analysis
The objective of data analysis was to produce findings by making sense of the data
gathered during the interview process (Patton, 1990). The data in this study allowed me to move

38

with the families through the decision-making pathway from the circumstances that precipitated
the process to the ultimate choice. I began analyzing the data through a continuous process when
I began preparing transcripts of the interviews. The interview was then input into
HyperResearch coding software, which enabled me to identify commonalities, concepts, and
themes (Rubin & Rubin, 2005). The coding software operated as a data organizer and helped to
organize, store, and manipulate the data that was in the form of text (Rudestam & Newton,
2007). Text data was the foundation of this phase and the analysis required that I read, reread,
and reflected on the data. Using my theoretical framework on decision-making processes
[graphically displayed in Figure 2.1], I, identified significant patterns in the processes the
respondents described in their interviews. During the data analysis process I used graphics to
provide an effective way to describe the findings. When graphics are skillfully planned and
designed, it helps to visualize, process, summarize and perceive the data (Miles & Huberman,
1994).
This process enabled me to construct my results (Patton, 1990; Miles & Huberman,
1994). The reduction of data into the concepts contained within the theoretical framework
helped me solidify the data into a format that is displayed [Figure 2.1] and shared (Seidman,
2006). While identifying significant patterns and repeating ideas, I worked to construct a
theoretical narrative on how parents decided to begin or discontinue homeschooling (Auerbach
& Silverstein, 2003).
When reviewing the circumstances that precipitated a parent to initiate the decisionmaking process, I began looking at elements that correlated across families. Commonalities
between families in the study were found by defining the circumstances into subgroups entitled
specific events, conditions of schools and families, characteristics of parents and characteristics

39

of children. Each subgroup was subsequently defined based on responses given by parents
through the interview process.

3.5 Validity and Reliability
Validity and reliability are important elements of the research that assure readers and
reviewers of this research that the researcher was objective during the evaluation and analysis
phase of the research (Auerbach & Silverstein, 2003). I worked to minimize threats to internal
validity by holding the interviews under conditions which were comfortable to the interviewee. I
interviewed homeschooling parents in their homes, at restaurants, in a quiet office during an
outdoor educational homeschooling camp, or in my office based on the preference and comfort
of the participants. The internal validity may be marginalized due to a lack of trust or concerned
attitude by the parents of homeschoolers. Throughout the process of communicating with the
interviewees, describing the level of confidentiality in the study, and interviewing the families,
they all appeared to have a level of trust in my ability to assimilate their decision-making
memories and represent their experience in a fair manner. My previous contact with many of the
convenience sample interviewees and my position in the mid-Michigan Christian community
also helped to raise their level of trust in me as a researcher, thereby raising the level of internal
validity in this study. Using the personal referrals through the snowball method, their level of
trust was elevated. I made three contact visits, by meeting the potential interviewees at their
church to help negate any concern they had about talking to me. After the contact visit, one of
the interviewees told me that she was very happy to speak with me because she really wanted to
have an opportunity to tell her story. The contact visits were integral in establishing a productive
relationship with the three homeschooling parents (Maxwell, 2005). The balance of the families

40

did not require a contact visit due to their familiarity and trust with their snowball referral contact
or with me.
During the data interpretation and coding phases of the research, the study developed a
level of reliability because the data was coded and interpreted into themes that could be
understood by anyone who reviews the data (Frankel & Wallen, 1993). The study could be
replicated in other states or across the country (Creswell, 1994). When answering the question,
“What process do parents go through when deciding to choose to homeschool their children,” the
area of external validity or trustworthiness was minimally addressed by determining that the
questions answered the focus of the research. However, the trustworthiness may have been
compromised by the fact that not everyone I contacted agreed to an interview. One may imagine
that those who were willing to speak with me regarding their experience deciding to begin or end
homeschooling represented the best case scenario. Many of the families (79 percent) who were
interviewed had at some point of time in the past forty years been affiliated with the same large
church, with over 2000 members, in mid-Michigan. Some of the families in my study had at one
time been affiliated with the school where I was serving as superintendent. Only one family had
a student enrolled in the school when I conducted the interview. This connection may have also
compromised the external validity or trustworthiness of my study. While an audit trail would
have augmented the validity of the study, I chose not to add an additional researcher to validate
the decisions made during the research (Creswell, 1994; Rudestam & Newton, 2007).
The study has addressed transparency by giving the reader an opportunity to view the
steps I take to collect and analyze the data (Rubin & Rubin, 2005). Each step of the analysis has
been explained. I have maintained careful records, including cataloging and filing all recordings,
transcripts, and journal entries (Auerbach & Silverstein, 2003).

41

Communicability and believability are important to this phase. The ability to effectively
and succinctly communicate and explain the research themes and theoretical framework has led
to the communicability of the project (Auerbach & Silverman, 2003). By demonstrating that the
interviewees have been straightforward and accurately represented during the analysis phase has
elevated the believability of the results of this study (Rubin & Rubin, 2005).
The population of my study [Table 3.3] is compared to the population of the United
States and of the NHES study (IESd, 2007). My study had a higher percentage of Christians due
to the network from which the convenience sample was taken. Although the study is not
generalizable due to the focused nature of the convenience and snowball samples, the
foundational analyses of the decision-making processes regarding homeschooling could inform
the design of larger scale and more generalizable research down the line. While the U.S.
population has a larger percentage of older children than kindergartners, both the NHES survey
and my study showed more parents began homeschooling their children in kindergarten (IESd,
2007). When reviewing my study, I found that the results included more families who were
white than the general U.S. population or the results from the NHES (IESd, 2007). The
population of my study included a higher percentage of mothers who had earned their bachelor’s
degrees, than did the U.S. population or the NHES (IESd, 2007). The large NHERI (2008)
study found that 62.5 percent of mothers who homeschooled had a bachelor’s degree. One of the
impacts of the increased percentage of bachelor’s degrees in the population of mothers in my
study is that there is an increased level of social capital. When they write about social capital,
Adler and Kwon (2002) refer to linkages, relations, and connections within a community. The
increased level of social capital may also help to support the academic goals and tasks within a

42

particular group of homeschoolers. Both the NHES and my study had a higher percentage of
married couples than does the general U.S. population (IESd, 2007).

Table 3.3 Comparison Data for U.S. Population, NHES Homeschooling Survey (IESd, 2007) and
My Study

The criteria of adequacy and appropriateness of data was informed by the population who
responded positively to the request for an interview, those who actually met with me and
interviewed, and the questions in the interview (Creswell, 1994). The issue of producing a
coherent analysis was addressed by organizing the data and fitting it into the theoretical
framework (Auerbach & Silverman, 2003).

43

CHAPTER 4: FINDINGS ON PARENTAL DECISION-MAKING PATHWAY

The analysis of the research revealed that the course of the decision-making process is
critical as parents contemplate a move to homeschooling or consider discontinuing teaching their
children at home. In this chapter I discuss the analysis of the progression parents go through as
they begin to contemplate homeschooling all the way through the decision-making process
culminating in a final choice to begin or discontinue teaching their children at home. The
analysis includes a description of the route or pathway parents follow when pursuing the final
decision regarding the appropriate learning environment for their child. The discussion of key
precipitating circumstances surrounding the events, conditions, and characteristics of the
decision-making process is the subject of chapter five.
The study of fourteen families found that in twelve cases the parents made the decision to
homeschool for their first child and in two of the families, the initial decision to homeschool was
made based around circumstances regarding the education of the second child. In both of the
cases where the initial decision to homeschool was made regarding the second child, the first
child had attended school with virtually no concerns. For the purposes of clarity, rather than
discussing the eldest or subsequent children based upon birth order, the results are discussed
regarding the initial and subsequent decision-making processes that a family makes. The initial
decision correlates to the initial child for whom homeschooling was seriously considered.
The findings of the study revealed that out of fourteen homeschooling decisions for the
initial child, the majority of the choices were determined to belong to one of two decisionmaking processes: convergence or insightful. The pie chart below [Figure 4.1] is a representation
of the percentage of parents who followed a defined decision-making process when deciding to

44

move their initial child to homeschooling. This decision-making process applied to young
children who had not yet started kindergarten as well as children who were attending a school
whether public, charter, or private.
Figure 4.1 Decision-Making Process for Initial Child When Beginning to Homeschool
Sequential
14%

Iterative
Sequence
7%

Insightful
36%
Anarchical
0%
Linkages
0%

Convergence
43%

During the analysis it became clear that in the two key decision-making models, the
schooling choice for the initial child was a critical and complex process filled with thoughtful
research, conversations with homeschooling friends, and contemplation regarding faith
implications. During the study it became evident that when the parents initiated the decisionmaking process and followed it through the twists and turns, while researching and spending
time talking to each other and with their friends, they made a life-changing realization. For both
the convergence and insightful decision-making processes, this first choice was not a simple
assessment of the pros and cons of homeschooling but rather a pathway where each family had to
overcome feelings of self-doubt and uneasiness, along with, in some cases, a fundamental
aversion to of the idea of homeschooling.

45

4.1 Convergence Decision-Making
The six families who followed the pathway entitled convergence decision-making [Table
4.1] made up the largest group in the study.
Table 4.1 Characteristics of the Decision-Making Process for Families who Followed the
Convergence Model
Chrystal

Parent is concerned with their
child’s safety
Child requested that they be
homeschooled
Parent is concerned about
homeschooling
Child is homeschooled in pK and
child is advanced
Parent has a general academic
concern
Parent has a specific academic
concern
Parent/child has negative interaction
with school
Child has disability or health
concern
Father had difficulty in school
Father encourages wife to
homeschool
Parent believes they can homeschool
child
Stay-at-home mom
Parents admire traits of
homeschooled children
Parent has homeschool friendly
friends
Faith concerns, church is
homeschool friendly, God influences
parents to homeschool
Parent researched homeschooling

46

June &
Marcus

Debbie

Tina

Karis

Randie

The convergence model was made up of families facing the decision-making process and
finding themselves at the mercy of an element of chaos, integrated with sudden curves and
turning points before focusing in on the final choice of homeschooling their children (Figure 2.1,
line D) (Langley et al., 1995). Families in the study who were classified as belonging to the
convergence model found themselves in a process that unfolded from the origination of the
initial idea of thinking about homeschooling. The process proceeded with the families steadily,
little by little focusing on the final decision. This decision-making pathway included areas of
distinct, discrete and tangible concrete phenomena that were considered in a responsive
environment based upon culture, beliefs, opinions and experience as the schooling options were
narrowed toward the final choice of homeschooling (Langley et al., 1995).
Taking a closer look at the six families who followed the convergence decision-making
process, it was evident that there were some critical observations that depicted the conditions
surrounding their choice. All of the families had academic concerns for their child’s learning
environment. The academic concerns of the parents included basic worries about available
curriculum, increased emphasis on testing, accommodations for gifted or struggling students, and
the belief that their child was more advanced than their peers. While interviewing June and
Marcus I asked why they homeschooled their children. Marcus, who is a certified teacher,
became animated as he explained,
I feel that schools are broken and driven by testing. Granted, I work in public
schools, so that's why I see that schools are [broken]. I don't think they function
very well especially as you move up; especially elementary [schools]. But then as
you move up they start to do this specialization thing that I feel is a lie. I think a
good teacher can teach about anything and they can help a student learn just about
anything, but they break off into this is a subject area and this is, that doesn't work
(pounding on the table). Sorry.

47

The families who followed the convergence pathway had a heightened level of concern
with academics. When her daughter Camille was three years old, Chrystal began intentionally
teaching her using a preschool curriculum. Camille enjoyed learning so much that she breezed
through the curriculum in a short time. The longer Chrystal worked with Camille, the more she
liked teaching. She said, “There is nothing like being there when your child learns something
new. The a-ha moments aren’t just for someone in a school building. It’s that you get to see
those little light bulbs go on.” Chrystal continued by telling me,
It felt logical – but you are used to teaching your own child and Camille was my
first child. She had a desire to learn, so that was coming all throughout her being
too. So just before she turned four she was already reading, so she was pushing
me. She was, but she made it easy. Like I said, I had to take curriculum away
from her so we had done preschool stuff when she was three and when she was
four she was officially reading (and) writing.
It was obvious that Chrystal was passionate about her child’s education. Similarly, the
other families in the convergence model had a heightened level of concern for their child’s
learning environment. Their concerns were focused on the lack of congruency of the school’s
pedagogy with their belief system, along with uneasiness due to their belief that the classroom in
a traditional school lacked rigor and mastery. Most of the families who followed the
convergence decision-making model explained that they had specific concerns with their child’s
ability to study in a traditional school setting. For Karis and her husband Herb, their eldest child,
Holden, was ahead of his classmates and was bored with the lack of academic stimulation. Karis
told me about her son Holden’s experience in elementary school. She said, “When he started
third grade he sat in class and said he was so bored because he knew how to do it. He would say,
I learned it a long time ago, I think in first grade.”
A majority of the families who followed the convergence decision-making pathway had
children who either suffered from health concerns or a disability including dyslexia or attention
48

deficit disorder. Chrystal, a mother of four children, found it easy to homeschool her eldest
child. But when she began teaching her second child to read, it was difficult and at times
frustrating. She described her experience with Isaiah by explaining,
Isaiah (seemed so intelligent, but with) his reading level he really had a hard time
(and) his writing (and) even phonics. We spent two years on phonics. One day
he could read the word cat, the next day we would sit down to work on it and it
was like he had never seen it before. Even in the same paragraph sometimes he
could read it and sometimes he would have to sound it out like he had never seen
it before. It was so frustrating. It turned out that he can read. It was like a switch
flipped and he could read fluently.
Karis and her husband Herb found that their daughter, Anne, struggled in class and was
not given much assistance. Karis described her daughter’s difficulty learning in her classroom.
She explained,
The one thing that really bothered us about her was the reading. She could
memorize the page just by hearing it and she wouldn't even know (what) the words
were. And there is such a big push to get all the state requirements done. As long
as she could sit down with a book and she would say, “What does this say?” and
then go over the same book again, she knew how to read it. But when I would take
a book and take it apart and move it around, she had no clue (and) that bothered
me. Oh my gosh my daughter doesn't read! Then they moved her on to first grade.
They said don't worry about the phonetically handwriting skills, don't worry about
the fact she can't spell, don't worry about that she can't read, it will all come
together.
Like many of the other families who followed the convergence decision-making pathway,
Karis had a negative interaction with their child’s school or potential school. When Karis found
that the school was basically taking a wait-and-see attitude rather than actively giving her
daughter assistance, she continued by saying,
But I am an impatient person so I said you know we need to do something on this,
because math she excels because she pictures everything. She processes. Her
processing skills are really strong in math. So we are like we have to do
something about this. So that was one reason we pulled her too was the reading.
And they put her in a reading lab and she said it was basically memorization. I
found out that she didn't learn any phonics at all. It really bothered me and I said
I have to get my daughter reading and to learn how to spell.
49

At that time she began reaching out for assistance. She searched the web and found a
curriculum company that specialized in homeschooling resources. When she talked to the
curriculum company the representatives had experience homeschooling and working with
children who had learning concerns. The representatives were able to answer her questions and
suggest appropriate information and an educational program to assist her with Anne’s
difficulties.
Karis was not the only parent in the study to have researched curriculum and programs to
assist their children to learn successfully. All of the parents who followed the convergence
process did in-depth research on homeschooling including reading books and pamphlets,
attending conferences, surfing through internet sites, calling curriculum companies, and most of
the interviewees consulted friends, who homeschooled their children. When Randie reflected on
her process of investigating homeschooling her children, it brought back memories of her
pathway to a final decision. She told me that, “Before we decided to homeschool somebody
gave that (The Well Trained Mind) book to me.” She continued talking about investigating
homeschooling by saying, “I investigated a couple curriculums. I went to the conference and
investigated them and saw some of them done. (I) visited co-ops to see how kids acted and are
they normal kids, (or) are they obnoxious kids?”
Chrystal, the mother of a three-year-old, had not yet contemplated homeschooling her
child, but had began working with her by teaching her the alphabet and other basic information.
She was working in the church nursery when she overheard a conversation regarding
homeschooling.
When Camille was three years old, I heard people in the nursery at church talking
about homeschooling and I mentioned that I was very interested; too bad I am not
qualified for it. I didn’t finish college. I thought it was interesting, but I couldn’t
do it.
50

Chrystal was interested in learning more about the idea so she attended a women’s retreat at her
church.
I went to this women’s retreat at my church and (the speaker) said she
homeschooled her child. She was going to send her to school, but she felt that
God was convicting her to homeschool. And she thought of all the stuff she could
do in her free time; she could go back to her career, that sort of thing. And she
said she didn’t feel qualified, but God provided everything she needed. And she
said you are just going to have to pray about it and see what God has for you.
At this point in her research, Chrystal began praying to God, asking Him to direct her as
she was working on investigating the best educational placement for her daughter Camille.
During the study, it was evident that Chrystal was in the majority of parents who followed the
convergence model of decision-making, by putting her faith in God to direct her educational
decisions regarding her child. Chrystal talked about how her faith in God directed her to
continue her research by attending the local conference on homeschooling.
Then God started to work on my heart and He said, ‘See, see, this is something I
have for you.’ God was just persistent and I prayed about it. Someone said there
was a convention in the city and I could go to it and find out more. So I told my
husband, and he thought that this was so strange and people who did it basically
hid their children. That was true, fifteen years ago. It’s different now; it’s
beginning to become normalized. And so we went to the conference and David
was very impressed and came away very convicted that this was something that
God had definitely (wanted) for us and He wanted us to… (homeschool). So we
did (homeschool our daughter).
In the same way Chrystal’s faith was central to her decision to begin homeschooling her
daughter Camille, another mother in the convergence decision-making group, Randie, also
expressed her interaction with God when praying for guidance as she struggled to decide where
she should place her children for their education. At the time she began praying for guidance her
son, Ronald was in kindergarten at a Christian school that was about twenty minutes away from
her home. Randie talked about her belief of God guiding her to begin homeschooling by telling

51

me that, “I do think part of it was God working. At the beginning, I think He was heading us in a
certain direction.” Similarly, Karis commented on her experience when searching for the best
options for her children. She talked about God’s influence. Karis said, “I think that honestly I
kept getting this head-beat from God that we need to do something different; this is just not
going to work.”
Debbie also commented on her feelings regarding God’s guidance and influence on her
choosing to homeschool her children. She explained,
Well, we had recently become friends with some (people) that we got to know.
And we became very good friends. And they homeschooled, and they were
affiliated with a lot of homeschoolers. And we kind of took that as yes this is
God's plan. That was kind of the confirmation because we had thought about it
before and no we (were)… not going to do it. And I would start thinking about it
again and then I became involved with these friends and that was what they were
doing and that was kind of a confirmation for us.
Parents not only prayed for God’s guidance when searching for answers regarding their
child’s learning options, many of the parents also valued the integration of faith into their child’s
learning environment. While interviewing June and Marcus they explained that not only were
they concerned about the academics in schools, but they believed that it was important to have a
focus on Christian values when educating children. Marcus commented,
Well it's a lot about that (pedagogy) but I also feel strongly that we have to have
fundamental Christian perspective. So when I see schools that, I work in a public
school and they are trying to do something different, but what is missing is they
don't have the core worldview piece. They are trying to build off of character,
and that's not going to work. Until they really put Christ in the center, they are
not going to get it. Yes, that's where we are different.
All of the parents who followed the convergence model of decision-making mentioned
that they had faith concerns including the belief that God was telling them to homeschool. They
were concerned that public schools had a lack of emphasis on faith or they believed their church

52

was homeschool friendly. As I was listening to Marcus and June talk about their experience with
homeschooling, June explained why she felt it was important to homeschool their children:
My reason to homeschool is that I love to know what my kids are doing
throughout the day and that we can talk about what's happening during the day
and how God is related to all that. For me, it is a passing on of a worldview and a
belief system. You can still do that if your kids are in school. It is just harder
because you don't know all the things they are taking in, that they are
experiencing. You don't get to be a part of all that. To me that's why I like to
homeschool that you are a part of their lives and you share all this life together
and you can talk about all of that.
At the time of our interview Chrystal had been homeschooling for over ten years. She
discussed her feelings regarding her teenage children and the importance of having a Christian
influence in their school environment. She commented on her philosophy, “In an age when you
don’t know yourself very well and you are willing to try a new identity, it is most important to
know who you are in Christ.” Tracy echoed similar sentiments when discussing her concerns
about her children and their learning environment. She said, “So sometimes it’s better to
homeschool, because you tell them what to learn. They don't get faith in their schooling in
public school.”
When looking at the families whose decision-making process followed the convergence
model, all of the parents revealed that they had concerns about their ability to teach their children
on a daily basis prior to deciding to homeschool. Debbie talked about her concerns with
homeschooling and how she felt some of her friends were “superwomen.” Her lack of
confidence in being able to homeschool was partially relieved when one of her friends provided
a model for homeschooling. Debbie told me about that realization and said,
As I got to know my one friend, I thought if she can do it, I can do it. She
basically said, if I can do it, anyone can do it. Some of the people at my church
seemed like superwomen, and I thought oh, my gosh, I, no way can I do this. I
am not a Sheri or a Lindy. They just got it going; I don't. It just seemed more

53

realistic seeing my girlfriend, yes, we are a lot alike and she is able to do it, I
guess I could do it.
Most of the families who followed the convergence decision-making pathway explained
that after moving through the decision-making process, they became convinced that they would
be able to teach their children, even if it was for only kindergarten or first grade. While
interviewing June, who has homeschooled for the past nine years, I asked her about being
reticent to begin homeschooling her children and what finally convinced her to begin teaching
Emma at home. She answered by saying, “Well in my mind, I was stuck on ‘I am only doing
this for one year’.”
In the convergence model all of the husbands encouraged their wives to homeschool their
children even if their wives were not initially receptive to the idea of homeschooling. June
talked about how even before they had children her teacher husband believed that
homeschooling would be the best educational placement for his future children. June said,
This is how it started for us. Marcus was teaching (in a public school) and his first
year he had 13 kids that ran the gamut of really, really smart to really struggling.
It was a long year working hard to meet the needs of all those kids. The next year
(Marcus) met a homeschooled kid when he came to pick up his sister and he had
all these conversations with him. The more he talked to him the more he said he
thought home schooling was a good idea. I think home schooling is a really good
idea. I think we should do that. My response was always that I will never do that.
If you want to do that you would have to do it yourself. He thought it was a good
idea.
Similarly, Tina’s husband, Tom, encouraged her to homeschool their children beginning
with their oldest son. Tina was teaching Chinese to children through a school and Tom believed
that if she could teach other children Chinese, she could homeschool their son. During our
interview Tina explained, “When my oldest was four we just started preschool and it was very
hard for me to decide. My husband said, ‘Sure you could do it (homeschool),’ because I was
teaching in the Chinese school.” Tina continued by saying, “At first he… wanted me to
54

homeschool. I (was) kind of half-and-half, I (wasn’t) sure about the language part; I should say
the English part. He (thought) that wouldn't be a problem.”
In addition to having husbands who encouraged and supported their wives, the group of
families who followed the convergence decision-making process also had a higher level of
concern regarding safety of their children in the traditional school setting as contrasted with the
other groups. When speaking with Karis regarding her son’s classroom, she said, “There are a lot
of discipline problems in the classroom and the teacher was so overwhelmed.” She explained
further about her son’s personal concern about the school environment, “He didn't like to be in
that bully-ish environment.” She further illuminated her concern about her children’s safety by
explaining, “I must admit, the safety in the public schools, even though we have a little school,
you never know what could happen in a little school.”
Other parents who followed the convergence decision-making process also mentioned
their concerns regarding the perceived inadequate safety for her children. Randie investigated
the local public school by visiting and meeting with Ronald’s potential teachers. While speaking
to the teachers, Randie was concerned not only for her son’s physical safety, but for his
emotional safety as well. Her biggest concern was that the teachers recommended that she put
her first-grade son in third grade. When speaking about her concerns, she explained, “I sure as
heck wasn't going to put him in third grade. He would not have survived. It would have been
horrid and for them to suggest it bothered me.” Randie continued talking about her concerns, “I
don't know, I had a hard time imagining Ronald dealing with that (beginning third grade when he
was only six). Back then one of his biggest struggles was dealing with … kids picking on him.
That's just how he is.”

55

The group of parents who followed the convergence process also showed a propensity to
notice the traits of children who were being homeschooled to a greater degree than those who
followed the other decision-making processes. As I interviewed Debbie, she talked about
knowing people who homeschooled their children. As a follow up question, I asked her if she
saw anything in her friends’ children that were traits she would like her own children to emulate.
She said, “Confidence.” Then Debbie continued and illuminated her answer by saying,
Many of the homeschooled kids that I would want my kids to be like, they were
confident and relate well and communicate well with adults and they weren't just
bashful and could only communicate with kids their age and that was it.
While interviewing Randie, she told me that before beginning to consider homeschooling
she had heard positives and negatives. When I asked her to elaborate on the positives and
negatives, she talked about the way some homeschooled children seemed so well-rounded and
personable. As she talked the positive impression she mentioned,
I witnessed many homeschool families … (and the well) roundedness of those
kids. They have an ability to interact with all ages. …It would be hard for (my
children) Ronald and Brielle not to come up and sit and join our conversation.
During the interviews several of the convergence mothers talked about their husband’s
negative experiences when they were in school and the way that influenced their encouragement
of homeschooling. Tina told me about her husband, “From his experience (in school) he thinks
the boys should be homeschooled.” Debbie echoed Tina’s sentiments by saying of her husband,
Don, “His experience (in school) was really bad.” While speaking with June and Marcus
regarding Marcus’ encouragement of homeschooling, Marcus commented,
Partly I went into teaching for spite. I was so annoyed with how things were
when I was in school and how much of a waste of time things felt like to me, that
I wanted to go change the world. I don't know that I changed the world.

56

Across all the twists and turns, the critical nature of convergence decision-making
provided parents with a pathway filled with importance, thoughtful research, conversations and
contemplation. As the families who pursued the convergence model followed the nuances of this
process, it was obvious that there were elements that were universal across all of the parents and
there were components that were specific to particular families.
As I have exhibited and discussed the critical elements of the parents’ views regarding
their children’s academic environment, the safety of the school setting and the propensity of the
families who experienced the convergence decision-making process to notice the traits of
homeschooled children, it was apparent that the pathway developed out of distinct, discrete and
tangible concrete phenomena considered in a responsive environment based upon culture,
beliefs, opinions, and experience as the options were narrowed towards the final choice. The
experiences that were considered in a responsive environment based upon culture, beliefs, and
opinions revealed a connection between the heightened level of concern for academics and
safety, combined with the parents’ increased level of perception of the traits of homeschooled
children that may have resulted from the fact that most of the fathers in this group of families had
experienced difficulty in school and actively encouraged their stay-at-home spouse to
homeschool their children.

4.2 Insightful Decision-Making
Five families in the study followed the pathway entitled insightful decision-making. The
families who followed the insightful decision-making process [Table 4.2] made up the second
largest group in the study.

57

Table 4.2 Characteristics of the Decision-Making Process for Families that Followed the
Insightful Model
Lindy &
Ken

Mindy

Jessica Janice Julica

Parent is concerned with their child’s
safety
Child requested that they be homeschooled
Parent is concerned about homeschooling
Child is homeschooled in pK & child is
advanced
Parent has a general academic concern
Parent has a specific academic concern
Parent/child has negative interaction with
school
Child has disability or health concern
Father had difficulty in school
Father encourages wife to homeschool
Parent believes they can homeschool child
Stay-at-home mom
Parents admire traits of homeschooled
children
Parent has homeschool friendly friends
Faith concerns, church homeschool
friendly, God
Parent researched homeschooling

The insightful decision-making model has specific points of insight that are evident when
families hear or read something that helps to narrow their focus in an environment bounded by
the view of possibilities and the determination of personal costs and benefits when coming to a

58

conclusion that results in a choice to homeschool their child (Paton, 2007; Langley et al., 1995).
In addition to the points of insight, the insightful (Figure 2.1, line E) decision-making process
featured elements of chaos similar to that experienced by the convergence families, and which
included emotion and indecision, research-filled activities, talking to others, reading information,
contacting current homeschoolers, tabulating pros and cons, and weighing optional programs.
Although both groups experienced chaos, the key distinction between the convergence
and insightful families is that families who followed the insightful decision-making pathway
experienced a clear flash of understanding, at certain points, that led to their final choice to
homeschool. For the families in the study these moments of insight included the diagnosis of an
illness that seemed to preclude a child from attending school, the realization that a child was in a
school situation that did not live up to the parents’ expectation, the mother’s perception of that
her child who could read at four years old may be bored in school, the experience of a parent
realizing that her daughter was detached from the classroom experience, and a father who was
influenced when he noticed that his six-year-old homeschooled niece had an excellent
understanding of geology. While these examples represented a small subset of the insights
encompassed in the study, it provides an illustration of the families “a-ha” moments. The
insightful model of decision-making shares some aspects with the convergence model, but
differs in the actual pathway. The insightful model put its focus on the moments of insight,
together with tabulation of personal costs and benefits and pros and cons of the aspects or the
decision pathway in contrast to those who followed the convergence model who actually began
with at least an inkling of the idea to homeschool and then proceeded with steady movement
narrowing the argument through zigs and zags to the final choice.

59

By contrast to those whose characteristics fit into the attributes of the convergence model
[Table 4.1], the majority of the families who followed the insightful decision-making process
[Table 4.2] did not comment on their admiration of the traits of homeschooled children. Rather
it appears as though they were propelled by positive conversations with homeschooling friends
and the impact of their research into homeschooling. Focusing on the families who followed the
insightful model of decision-making, it is clear that they were concerned about their child’s
academic achievement, but they did not mention concerns regarding the safety of their children.
The families who followed the insightful decision-making process showed a great
amount of love and care for their children, but appeared less concerned about the negative
aspects of raising children than did those in the convergence model. The group of insightful
families talked about teaching their children in a positive vein. They were impressed by the idea
of giving their children the ultimate educational opportunity and focused on a positive future.
Similar to the convergence model of decision-making, most of the families had stay-athome moms when they began homeschooling, but many of the insightful group of moms
intended to return to their careers when their children were in school. Mindy, a former career
woman with a Master’s degree in business told me that she planned to return to work. She
explained by saying, “I've always thought that once my kids got to a certain age, and we put
them into school, I would get my career going again because I went to school for many years and
got those degrees.”
As the families moved into the decision-making pathway, they found themselves with
various initial insights into the pros and cons of homeschooling their children. Some of the
families had initial insights regarding their child’s learning environment. Lindy and Ken wanted
their daughter, Alexandra, to have a stimulating, successful experience in kindergarten.

60

However, they found her in what they believed to be a lack-luster learning environment. While
discussing Alexandra’s kindergarten experience Lindy said, “It turned out to be kind of a bad
experience for her. The teacher, it was her last year before retiring so she was not really into it. I
don't know. My expectations were probably way too high.” Lindy continued by exclaiming, “I
kept in the back of my mind, I could do better.”
Excited for her daughter to begin first grade, Lindy found herself gaining her second
point of insight. She explained by saying, “That following fall she went to first grade. That was
just the turning point for us. It was kind of a disaster; there were just a lot of circumstances.”
Lindy, a certified elementary teacher, continued: “What I saw and observed was more just
classroom management than teaching. …At that point she was ready to move on and reading
was a big deal.” Elaborating further she said, “I thought this is not what I wanted for her. I just
kept thinking that I could do better.” It was at that point Lindy realized she had to find another
avenue through which to educate her daughter Alexandra.
Lindy and her husband, Ken, found themselves at their third point of insight, which was
realizing that they could not afford to send their daughter to Christian school and that they had to
find another alternative. Lindy described this realization by telling me, “We thought about
Christian School and it was just too expensive for us.” As a college student Lindy had written a
paper citing the negative aspects of homeschooling. Previously, she had not believed that
homeschooling would be appropriate for her children, but now faced with the alternatives she
felt that their next step was to investigate homeschooling. Lindy explained about her thoughts
and feelings that fall fourteen years earlier:
It was during that fall I started praying about it. I thought maybe I ought to give
homeschooling a chance. The more I thought about it, I started reading books;
tons of books about homeschooling and I talked to people I knew about
homeschooling. At that time it really wasn't accepted as much as it is now.
61

Lindy continued to talk about her investigation into homeschooling by telling me about
all of the books she read. She remembered,
I hadn't even started thinking about homeschooling until she had started first
grade and oh, this is a problem again. …I started mulling it over in my head, and
how do you even do homeschooling and I just started reading. There were books
in the church library that I checked out. There were a couple (of books) that were
really good. They really got me thinking: What is the purpose of education?
What was my philosophy of education? What did I want my kids to gain from
being educated? So all those things just started, I started thinking about it. The
more I read, the more that I talked about (homeschooling to) other people. Those
books were really helpful.
For Ken, the fourth point of insight was that Lindy was at home with the two younger
children. Ken commented on Lindy’s status as a stay-at-home mother and how it impacted his
view of the options. He told me, “She was home with our other two kids and she was a teacher
and passionate about education (and) literature. It seemed like a really good fit.”

Lindy

continued talking about their evaluation of the option to homeschool by saying, “There were
only a handful of people that I knew that were homeschooling and their kids were really little.”
She continued by telling me, “I started talking to them and asking them how do you do this?”
Regarding the final point of choice, Lindy said, “So we decided over Christmas vacation, right
before Christmas vacation (ended) that we would try it. So we decided to take her out of school
and not go back after the Christmas break and I would try the homeschooling.” Lindy added that
her initial decision to homeschool was for the immediate time, but may not have taken them into
the future. She said that because of the situation at school she told me, “This was just sort of a
let's just try it. I was so nervous; I thought I was going to wreck her for us. (It was) just first
grade.”
In much the same way that Lindy and Ken were passionate about their daughter’s
education, but were not enthusiastic about homeschooling, Julica did not want to homeschool her
62

daughter, but wanted her to have the best learning environment available. Julica began realizing
that her eldest daughter, Norah, who was four-years-old seemed ready to begin learning. The
first point of insight for Julica was when her husband, Steve told her that he thought they should
homeschool. She explained, “My husband was very impressed with my nieces (who were
homeschooled) and how much they knew and he said we should homeschool.” At that point in
the interview, Julica said she told her husband, “Yeah, right.”
Julica’s second point of insight was that her husband not only was impressed with her
niece, but that he did not want his daughter to attend a public school because of his negative
experience when he was in school. Julica explained his experience by telling me,
He was a military brat so he actually grew up in several schools and would come
back to his hometown if they couldn't follow his dad. When his dad retired (when
my husband was) in eighth grade they came back to his hometown so he could go
to high school. He was really smart. He was gifted in math and science and he can
remember being bored to tears and getting into trouble. She will cause problems
because that's what he did. I don't want her to be like that. They will hold her back
because she is ready to multiply fractions but the other twenty-nine students can't
multiply straight numbers so I can't teach you fractions. I don't want her to do that
so that was his motivation.
When Julica recounted her third point of insight she said, “When Norah reached about four and
she was starting to pick up things from Sesame Street, she was ready to go to school.” Julica
continued by saying, “When Nicole got that to the age when it was time to go school he decided
we should do it (homeschool). I told him I would research it.” Initially thinking she would find a
better option for Norah than homeschooling, Julica said that, “So I thought I would just find a
private school that won't hold her back. That's why I initially did the research.”
Julica’s fourth point of insight came during her research of schools in the area. Julica
described her research by telling me,
As I was looking at the different schools, (the closest) Christian (school) is
basically a public school that you pay for at a higher rate. They are not overtly
63

Christian even though it's in their name. I am not sure how familiar you are with
them. It used to be that you had to have a letter from your pastor to use the fitness
center and a statement of faith. It has changed a lot. It's a good education but …
my dentist has two boys that have graduated from there and we talk about things.
The world-view that is coming out of there is not necessary a strict Christian.
There is more piled into that and now that I know what I am looking for, I can see
that now. When I was looking earlier it was the fee that was the drawback. The
Montessori school was way too laid back. If they feel like doing that then it was
okay. She's never going to feel like doing things; what kid would? How is that
going to work! She did some preschool books and I would say let's go ahead and
finish this and she would say I don't want to. But you could push her without too
much effort. So we said ok that's not going to fit. (Another Christian school says)
you have to go to their church. They have very strict rules as to what they require
to dress codes to regulations. (It is) very legalistic. That's not going to fit us
either.
Julica summed up her findings by saying, “So I checked into all the private schools in the area
and homeschool was much cheaper than paying tuition.”
By that point, Julica had solidified what she found initially in her fourth point of insight
and began to echo her husband’s sentiment of thinking homeschooling would be a better choice.
She said, “We also thought it would better fit her. Nicole was and is a smart kid.” To complete
her research and solidify her thoughts about homeschooling, Julica put in a call to her sister who
at that time was homeschooling four children. Julica talked about her call by saying,
So I called my sister and told her we were thinking about it doing this
(homeschooling). (I asked her,) what do you think? So she gave me some
recommendations. (My sister told me) well I use this, and I do that. And (she)
told me not to worry about certain things.”
Julica continued by explaining that during her call to her sister she felt encouraged to try
homeschooling. Julica said her sister gave her insight into homeschooling by saying,
She said you can do this. It will be great. You need to get to convention, and you
need to get curriculum and just get phonics and math. Don't worry about history!
She's really young so you don't need much. It will be easy. You can get it done
during Jennifer's nap time. She was all excited.

64

The encouragement Julica received from both her husband and her sister buoyed her
confidence and gave her the point of insight, that as she told me, “We started with phonics and
math and I went into it with the idea I couldn't screw up kindergarten. After all what do they
really learn anyway? It was short-term and we would take it year by year.” Julica’s short-term
foray into homeschooling when Norah was four-years-old has since become a full-time job.
After ten years and homeschooling four children, Julica proudly told me that Norah is now
working her way through high school.
When thinking about the initial point of insight for the families in the insightful decisionmaking group, I found that the educational philosophy had an impact on the way parents viewed
their children’s learning environment. The educational philosophy of the families who followed
the insightful decision-making pathway focused on successful learning. When interviewing
Janice, I asked her about the way she and her husband, Bradford, thought about learning, she
said,
We are bigger on making our lives an educational experience. That sounds totally
dorky, but we want to continue to learn. Brian and I don't want to stagnate. We
are always doing something to teach us more; whatever interests us. We see that
in our kids too. Like in the summer time we always did stuff, we were always
very involved.
She continued by telling me, “In the summer we actually bought curriculum to keep
interesting stuff like science and whatever.” The fact that Janice and Bradford were so interested
in providing their children with excellent learning experiences contrasted with the moment when
Janice realized that her daughter, Kelly, was in a classroom with children that she characterized
as “rowdy,” she began to question whether Kelly was getting the best education.
Similar to Lindy and Julica’s initial thoughts regarding educating their children, Mindy
was not in favor of homeschooling. Mindy, a successful career woman who was a varsity

65

basketball player and varsity cheerleader at her high school and her husband, Jeremy, a former
pro football player, both believed that they would send their children to a traditional school.
Reviewing her decision-making experience, it was evident that the initial point of illumination
was the fact that her son seemed too ill to attend school. As she talked about her experience she
said, “It came time for him to go to kindergarten and I really didn't see that we had the option for
sending him to school.” She continued to explain her realization by telling me that she felt if
they sent him to school it “is going to mean more trips to doctors, he is not going to be in a
school if we were to put him in a school and he's not going to be able to function in a classroom
(because of his illness).” She explained further,
When he was so sick, if you got him out into a noise and all that, he couldn't
handle it. I mean he was very bright; there was no doubt in my mind that he
could learn. It was just going to take a special environment for him to learn well.
Mindy’s background in business led her to research alternative educational programs for
her son Brian. Mindy began her research by attending a seminar at her church. Talking about
that experience, she said, “They had a woman’s night with different tables for different interests
and they had a table of homeschooling.” As Mindy listened, she decided to continue researching
homeschooling. She told me, “I began to gather information, researching and looking and
figuring it out.” During her research, Mindy said she read, “The Heart of Homeschooling.” She
continued by telling me about her experience researching homeschooling for Brian. She said,
I looked at other families in our church, who had been homeschooling for years,
and I looked at a lot of them and they were all elementary teachers and I thought
well that must be easy for them. They already are teachers, and I am coming from
this isn't my love, I didn't choose teaching. I attended a conference too, just to go
look at curriculum and get ideas.
It was at that point Mindy experienced her second point of insight. She said, “And (I)
thought maybe this is what we do for now, until we can get him doing better health wise.”

66

Mindy’s case with Brian is different than some of the others in that because of the critical nature
of his illness, there were fewer points of insight. Similarly to other families who followed the
insightful decision-making pathway, Mindy and her husband Jeremy completed many hours of
research looking into the pros and cons of homeschooling. Mindy’s presence at the women’s
seminar at her church provided the basic information regarding homeschooling that she built
upon through conversations with homeschooling moms, books that she read and her attendance
at the annual statewide homeschooling conference featuring speakers, round-tables and a vendor
area.
The other family who followed the insightful decision-making pathway found insight in
various elements of their research. Much like Mindy, Julica, Janice and Lindy, Jessica focused
on the pros and cons of homeschooling, along with a tabulation of the personal costs and benefits
of teaching her children at home. Her move from not being in favor of homeschooling her
children to being a full-time homeschooling teacher has had far reaching consequences. While
interviewing Jessica, she described her intentional program of education for her eighteen-monthold son, Alex. Jessica told me that she is doing basic instruction with Alex based on her
experience with her girls. She said,
For him I have been doing "Your baby can read." I am not being ridiculous about
it, but he watches a video. It is actually pretty good. They will say a word, and
then say the word again. They will say a picture about what it is talking about. It
lasts about twenty-five to thirty minutes long. I keep him as part of the school
day until it gets to the point where I need to work one-on-one with the girls and
then I need him to not run away. I have that exer-saucer over there. He can't
quite climb out of it. He will watch his video and suck his thumb. To what extent
he is getting it, I am not entirely sure… He seems to understand more than I
expect him to understand at this point. He can sign, but he doesn't seem all that
interested in it. So basically with him it is language skills, signing and a little bit
with puzzles and shapes. He adores a book on shapes. He knows what a circle is;
he goes around everywhere and when he finds a circle, says "circle" because it is
the shape of a ball. He goes from one ball to another ball to another ball. He goes
after the trucks and the balls. We have had a hoop for two years and it is finally
67

getting used. He goes up and he knows how to shoot hoops and he will do it for a
half-hour straight.
Jessica’s experience moving through the insightful decision-making process towards her
ultimate decision to begin homeschooling her eldest daughter has made such an impression on
her family that, in much the same way as Julica learned about homeschooling from her sister,
Jessica’s brother is considering homeschooling his children and Jessica told me about her mom’s
feelings: “She actually wishes she had homeschooled us.”
Across all of the critical insights experienced during the decision-making process by this
group of families, the specific points were evident when the families heard or read something
that helped to narrow their focus in an environment bounded by the educational possibilities and
the determination of personal costs and benefits. (Paton, 2007; Langley et al., 1995). In this
section, I have delineated that in addition to the points of insight, the insightful have traversed
through a decision-making process that featured elements of chaos, emotion and indecision,
integrated with thoughtful research, conversations and contemplation of the pros and cons and
weighing optional programs. As the families followed the measures of this process, it was
evident that there were specific elements that were universal across all of the parents in the study
and there were components that were specific to particular families. In the insightful model, the
analysis found similarities among this population.
In this section I have demonstrated and discussed the critical ingredients of the parents’
pathways, noticeably undergirded by similar views of the link between faith and education.
Families who followed the insightful decision-making pathway were identified by their
perceptible inclusion of moments of a clear flash of understanding at certain points in their
corridor to their final choice. These insights of discrete and tangible phenomena, based upon the

68

culture, beliefs and opinions of a family served to propel the parents along the pathway,
narrowing their focus of the learning environment for their children towards their final choice.

4.3 Similarities Between Convergence and Insightful
The greatest similarities between the convergence and the insightful decision-making
processes were found in three areas where all of the parents showed the same characteristics. All
of the parents in both groups were concerned and hesitant prior to deciding to homeschool their
children, they had concerns related to their faith, and researched homeschooling by reading
books or pamphlets, contacting curriculum companies, surfing websites dedicated to
homeschooling and attending conferences. Most of the families in the two groups had
discussions with their friends who homeschooled their children. Many of the parents began
homeschooling their child in preschool, which increased the child’s academic ability and added
to the belief that the child was advanced enough so that he or she would be stifled or bored in a
traditional school setting.
All of the parents in the insightful and convergence pathways were concerned about
homeschooling. At the beginning of the process the parents in the dominant models either did
not believe in homeschooling or had initial concerns about their ability to teach their children.
During my interview with Mindy she talked about her initial thoughts regarding homeschooling.
She said, “Never in my wildest dreams had I thought that I would homeschool my kids, because
those were weirdoes. Those people were weird, totally weird.” Mindy continue to talk about her
initial concerns by telling me, “I think at first I had thoughts; ‘How are we going to teach this
subject?’ ‘How are we going to do that?’ ‘I really don't like language arts.’ ‘I really e-w-w,
don't want to do this’.” Mindy’s thoughts were echoed by other parents in the study who faced

69

the idea of homeschooling with concern and even sometimes with an element of fear, which over
time, gradually subsided as they researched the educational options for their children.
In virtually all of the families in the convergence and insightful decision-making groups,
the parents eventually became confident that they would be successful teaching their children,
even if it was only for a year. This confidence was gained after time spent talking to their
friends, reading books, skimming through homeschooling websites, attending conferences and
reviewing curriculum. Jessica never had desired to be a teacher. She was in the doctoral
program studying chemistry at a large university when she decided to stay home with her first
child. Jessica had been working with her daughter, teaching her the alphabet, basic math facts
and a smattering in each of several foreign languages. As she began to delineate the pros and
cons of different educational options for Ellen, she came to the realization that, "I can't screw up
kindergarten. I'll just keep going for kindergarten." Jessica’s belief that kindergarten was basic
enough for her to teach, was pervasive across the families in the study. Julica echoed the same
sentiment regarding kindergarten. During the interview she revealed her increased level of
confidence when she talked about finishing kindergarten with Norah, who was bright and learned
easily. She said that when she finished the first year, she realized,
She (Norah) breezed through it and started reading before her fifth birthday. She
had gone through a kindergarten math program. Her birthday is in August and she
turned five. I thought this is kind of easy; we could do another year of this.
Julica’s confidence did not only emanate from her daughter’s ability to learn. She, along
with the other families in the two largest decision-making groups saw a connection between
faith and education. All of the families in the two dominate decision-making groups, insightful
and convergence, had interests regarding their belief in God and the connection to the local
schools. The interviewees also mentioned that they felt optimistic about homeschooling their

70

children due to the belief that God was encouraging them to homeschool and that public schools
had a lack of emphasis on faith. Many of the families also revealed that they believed that their
church was homeschool friendly. In many instances the parent would tie their interests in their
child’s learning environment and academic success to their faith concerns. When discussing her
thoughts regarding the traditional school setting, Jessica told me that, “I would read books about
what's going on in the public schools right now and it wasn't good stuff. (It was) how they are
“dumbing-down” education a lot of times and how God has been rejected entirely.”
Julica also talked about her philosophy regarding the link between education and faith in
God. She had been attending a mother’s Bible study group and some of the moms did not
believe in homeschooling. As she searched the Bible to become grounded scripturally in her
belief that homeschooling really was what God wanted her to do for her children, she told me,
The whole thing was what does God tell you to do with your kids? How can you
make that mesh? The whole (study) program is to help you do biblical parenting
from a mother's perspective. How to be the best mom for your kids? What you
should do with your kids? God gave them to you and not somebody (else). They
are your kids and that's when I had the epiphany that I am responsible for their
education as well as their spiritual up bringing as well as their physical health. It's
not just the one little microcosm you are in, you are responsible for the whole
thing. God gave all of that and I have to answer to that. I don't think that I could
do that if I send her to public school.
Julica continued on by explaining,
So at that point it became this (homeschooling) is what we are doing and we are
in it for the long haul. We will graduate them and they will be what they will be
and God will help us every step of the way.
This strong tie between education and faith was seen in each family in the two dominate
decision-making groups. As they proceeded through their interview it became evident that the
longer a family had homeschooled their children, the greater they believed that homeschooling
their children was a directive from God. After homeschooling her son Brian for ten years, Mindy

71

talked about the relationship her faith had with homeschooling. She explained that in the
beginning she realized, “I think it was really where God was leading us. This is what you are
going to do Mindy.” She continued by telling me that initially she was, “Pure just trusting God
that I could (homeschool).” Later in the interview when she was telling me about the successes
she was seeing with her children, she revealed, “So it is just those moments when God is giving
you: ‘See it's worth it, its working.’ We are seeing them really get something (academic
connections).” Mindy continued by telling me that faith connections are not just something she
sees, but that her children are linking their personal faith to what they are learning. She
explained that sometimes the connections come when you are least expecting it,
Those are the days when God sends you the glimpse of one of them (who) comes
up with some spiritual insight and wow - where did that come from? Well that's
incredible and they're getting it through (the curriculum) we are using here.
These are only a few examples of the connections between faith and education that were
discovered during the research into the parental decision-making pathways. The families in the
two dominate decision-making processes, convergence and insightful, had both similarities and
differences that have been discussed in detail. In addition to the two dominate decision-making
processes of convergence and insightful, there were four other pathways that were applied to the
processes the families followed. Of the four additional pathways that were considered, two of
the pathways did not apply to any of the families in this study and two of those considered
applied to a small defined group of families. The discussion of sequential and iterative sequence
decision-making pathways is discussed in the next section.

72

4.4 Additional Decision-Making Pathways
Other decision-making processes followed by families in the study include in two cases,
sequential and in one case, iterative sequence. Families who used the sequential model followed
a narrow, research-based focused process made up of rational stages that included the reduction
of various thoughts into the identification and definition of their interest in homeschooling, the
suggestion of homeschool options, evaluation of the alternatives, the actual decision choice,
implementation of the decision to homeschool and the evaluation of the decision to homeschool
(Lipham & Hoeh, 1974, Langley et al., 1995).
Families who followed the sequential decision-making pathway (Figure 2.1, line A)
focused on fundamental steps based on their research. Considering all of the options for their
eldest child, Connie and her husband, Josh, both with earned PhD’s in electrical engineering,
evaluated the options and found that homeschooling would provide a learning environment they
believed would lead to greater academic success for their son, Amos. As the mother of seven
described the thought process that brought her to her ultimate decision, she began by saying,
“We didn't think about homeschooling.” She continued by saying,
We had a child who could not write, he was going to be in sixth grade. We were
going to send him to a special school and we talked to the school counselor about
it. This was a public school, and the public school counselor said, “Don't send
him to a public school, homeschool him.”
Connie continued by reiterating, “It had never occurred to us to homeschool.” As she and her
husband reviewed their concerns regarding their son, the counselor’s words echoed in their
thoughts. Connie explained,
He was in fifth grade and we got exercises for him from the public school teacher.
The public school was not willing to investigate his problem. We got them (the
exercises) from the public school teacher, who got them from the public school
physical therapist; and we homeschooled him for sixth grade.

73

Connie and Josh’s straight-forward march toward homeschooling was aided by the
comments by the school counselor. As I continued to speak with Connie who was mixing up
cookie batter in her kitchen, her husband who had just arrived home from work, joined the
conversation. When I asked him what steps brought him to the point of homeschooling Amos,
he said, “First when we sent Amos to school and he spelled a word wrong they didn't have him
correct it, they just said good job! You did something! They didn't correct him. I think that was
the first thing.” At that point I queried further and Connie responded by saying, “We were going
to send him to a special school because he couldn't write...” Without breaking a verbal stride,
Josh interjected, “He couldn't even hold a pencil correctly.” Then Connie continued by
reiterating, “And the school counselor said homeschool. Do the exercises and homeschool.” It
really was that simple and straight-forward. The counselor suggested that they homeschool their
son, so they did.
Similar to Connie who was confident in her academic ability and had taught college level
engineering classes, Katrina had a master’s degree in curriculum and had taught high school
English for nine years. Katrina, like Connie, had herself attended a large city public school
system all the way through high school. In much the same way as Connie made decisions about
educating her son, Katrina found herself having to make decisions regarding the learning
environment that would be the best fit for her eldest son, Jonathan. As I analyzed her decisionmaking pathway, I found that Katrina also fit into the sequential process. Her thoughtful stepby-step process, led her away from believing that a traditional school setting would match her
son’s learning needs to the belief that she should begin to homeschool him in kindergarten.
Katrina had registered Jonathan in a private kindergarten program taught in a home by a
qualified teacher. Satisfied with her decision, she shared her thought process with one of her

74

friends. Upon hearing that Jonathan would attend that particular program, Katrina’s friend,
discouraged her by telling her that as a four-year-old, Jonathan already knew more than did her
daughter Malia who was in that particular kindergarten program. At that point Katrina began to
evaluate her options: public school, Christian school or homeschool. Due to her experience
teaching in a public school, Katrina quickly ruled that option out. Katrina, a stay-at-home mom,
evaluated their family’s finances and decided that Christian school was not an appropriate choice
because her husband was a full-time college student and they could not afford that option. Her
careful, logical, step-by-step evaluation of the options left her at the thought of investigating
homeschooling.
To educate herself on homeschooling, Katrina said that, “I talked with parents who were
already homeschooling.” Katrina continued by saying that she read the book,
“The Well Trained Mind”, by Bauer; I used that as my base because there is so
much out there I had to choose something. So I went with “The Well Trained
Mind” because it came highly recommended. And I started that as the base and I
made decisions off of that.
As Katrina settled in on the idea that she would definitely homeschool Jonathan, she
focused on three qualifying questions:
The first thing was that I had to be in agreement with (my husband) Devon,
because homeschooling impacts your family. We are choosing a lifestyle; so that
was the first step. Are both parents on board? The second step was, what, if we
choose to do this, what is our home going to look like? The third thing I had to do
for me is why? Why am I doing this choice? And then once we could answer
that, and we felt comfortable, we just moved into okay we are going to do it:
Action.
While Katrina differed from Connie in the age that she began homeschooling her initial
child, the analysis found that their similarities were in the straightforward, elemental process
they followed. As they evaluated their options, both families began with alternatives and
focused in on their final choice through a step-by-step process in a logical fashion that eliminated
75

unattractive selections. In contrast, the family who followed the iterative sequence process
found that they were working to make logical choices in a rational manner, but discovered that
they had become immersed in a sometimes muddled, expressively contrasted process.
The iterative sequence process (Figure 2.1, line C) began similar to the sequential
decision-making pathway. This process was viewed in the study as a theoretical half-way point
between sequential and anarchical decision-making (Langley et al., 1995). The family who
followed the process went through some chaos and distractions similar to the anarchical model as
they moved along the iterative sequence pathway. This model is characterized by a somewhat
organized, but messy emotionally challenged process filled with divergence that slows the
momentum to the final choice (Langley et al., 1995). When comparing iterative sequence with
the convergence process, it is evident that one basic difference is that parents who follow the
iterative sequence decision-making corridor do not begin with an idea of homeschooling, while
the parents in the convergence pathway, have a favorable view of homeschooling which affects
the way they view educational options. Additionally, the families who followed the iterative
sequence process were not initially against homeschooling, unlike the insightful families, but
neither were they seriously considering homeschooling to fit their family’s educational needs.
Furthermore, the families who followed the insightful process had clear points of insight into
their child’s learning environment which was not represented in the iterative sequence model.
Hannah and her husband, Justin, moved into homeschooling through a pathway that
included a focus on basic decision-making steps with a bit of variance tied to emotions. As I
reviewed Hannah’s interview and applied the formats of the decision-making pathways, I found
that her family belonged in the iterative sequence decision-making group. Hannah was the
mother of two small children when she found herself with a four-year-old who was ready to

76

learn. She did not have a background in education, but knew she should be doing something to
give her son the academic stimulation he seemed to desire. One of her friends at church
homeschooled all five of her boys and seemed to have a good grasp on raising responsible polite
children. Hannah described her interaction with her friend, Alice by saying,
Larry was very advanced even at four-years-old. He was ready to read and do
stuff, so I started looking at programs and stuff, just to give him something to do
to keep him busy. That’s when I called Alice and said, “What did you use when
your kids were this age for reading, because I think Larry is ready to start
learning?” She told me about (the program she used). So I got that package and I
did it with Larry and decided wow, this is really fun, I like sitting down with him
and teaching him.
At that point Hannah did not consider herself as homeschooling Larry, since he was not even in
kindergarten. Her goal was just to work with him because he seemed interested. Hannah talked
about her experience working with her son during the year before kindergarten. She told me,
When I first started out, I didn’t thing about any cons at the beginning. I loved
being at home with the kids. I told Justin that as long as I could do as good a job
as they could get anywhere else, I didn’t want to them to go away, I love being
with them.
Concerned that she would not make the right decision regarding the education of her
children, she talked to her husband and prayed that she would give her children the best
opportunity to succeed in all areas of life. Like some of the other families in the study, her
husband was concerned that children who are homeschooled were weird. He was not interested
in having his children turn out to be weird. Hannah commented on her confusion during that
period of her decision-making process by saying,
I remember praying about it with Justin and he was like, “Aren’t homeschooled
kids…don’t they not get along with other kids? (Aren’t they) weird in social
situations. It was getting over that hurdle.

77

Hannah and Justin’s concerns did not end with their thoughts regarding having weird
children. They were concerned with the legality of homeschooling. Hannah recounted her
concern by telling me,
I went to some seminars about the legality about it (homeschooling). What
records you needed to keep as far as if a social worker came to your door and
wanted to know why they (the children) were home? I guess, just looking into
making sure we were complying with what we had to do.
Hannah’s interest in working with Larry and teaching him led her to read books about
homeschooling. She also made another call to Alice to inquire about how she should go about
extending Larry’s learning experiences into kindergarten. She explained,
And so then I talked to Alice a little bit more and (she) recommended that I go to
the statewide conference at the City Center. (They) sit in seminars. They have
thirty different topics you can sit in on and learn all about homeschooling and
they have a lot of vendors selling stuff. So I did that the first year and thought oh,
my goodness I could never do this it is so overwhelming there is so much stuff
here! But then when it actually came to the point I would have had to do
kindergarten round- up. I thought I am going to try this (homeschooling). Larry
was already reading lots of books. At five-years-old he was all gung-ho. I thought
I would get some curriculum and do kindergarten; it went great with him. He was
easy to teach and the curriculum seemed very easy. I spent about an hour the night
before getting ready for the next day.
The step-by-step process considering logical contemplations, when compromised by
emotional issues revealed the iterative sequence pathway for Hannah and Justin. Although in the
analysis of this study only one family was identified as having traversed through the iterative
sequence decision-making process, in a different sample there may have been a greater
population.
During the course of the analysis, it was determined that for the initial child, few families
ventured through the decision-making process of sequential (fourteen percent) or iterative
sequence (seven percent) and none of the families used the processes that were classified as
anarchical or linkages. The validity of what the parents have communicated regarding their
78

decision-making experience may be influenced by their need to organize and make sense of their
memories; however the interpretation of the precipitating circumstances through the decisionmaking pathway to the final choice must come through the recollections of the parents.
Interestingly, during the analysis of the decision-making process for the subsequent
children the resulting percentages changed. As I have discussed, there is critical life-changing
nature in the decision-making process for the initial child. Due to the contrast regarding the
initial child and subsequent children, I have found that there is a more logical decision-making
methodology for the subsequent children. It was evident through the analysis that a greater
percentage of parents moved in a more step-by-step, straight-forward decision-making process
for their subsequent children.

4.5 Subsequent Children
Following the critical decision-making process for the initial child, the next decision was
more direct. For the subsequent children, the majority of the families in the study followed the
straight-forward, logical pathway of sequential decision-making. Through this process families
honed in on their final selection of homeschooling through a thoughtful pathway that followed a
finely planned conduit made up of stages of research plateaus, defined moments assessing
alternatives and educational options and movement towards the final implementation of their
choice (Langley et al., 1995).
After choosing to homeschool their initial child, all but one family either immediately
began homeschooling their subsequent children or began homeschooling them when they
reached schooling age. Many of the parents spoke with confidence when talking about

79

beginning to homeschool their subsequent children as though it made sense because they were
homeschooling the initial child.
For example, after homeschooling their eldest child, Amos for one year in sixth grade,
Connie and Josh’s second child, Andrea asked if she could be homeschooled for sixth grade just
like her brother. Andrea was an easy-going child who was a quick learner and Connie said that it
was an easy decision to allow her to be educated at home. As they spoke about their decision,
they just added it into the conversation in a matter-of-fact way. Josh said, “Then when you
decided to homeschool Andrea; then we just homeschooled (our children) in sixth grade.” Their
comment also included the fact that they homeschooled their third child, Jacob for sixth grade.
At the point where their fourth child, Marilyn, was ready to go to sixth grade she told her parents
that she liked school and did not want to be homeschooled. Connie and Josh acquiesced to her
request and allowed her to attend school. When they found that their fifth child, Fred who was in
first grade, had been poisoned by a bug-bomb released in his classroom, they followed the
sequential decision-making pathway to choose to homeschool him. When discussing their level
of concern when focusing on Fred’s learning environment, they said that they began
homeschooling him in first grade and had continued homeschooling him and that now he was in
eighth grade. Connie remembered the events and said, “It never occurred to us to do it more than
one year until Fred was injured.” Their decision to bring Fred home for his education prepared
them to homeschool their next child beginning in first grade. A couple of years later their sixth
child, Isaiah, was in kindergarten at the local public school when they had a conversation with
his teacher. Connie commented on the discussion:
The public school teacher suggested that we not keep Isaiah in the school because
as the kids transition from kindergarten to first grade they go to a self-directed
kind of thing. Well you would know, they go from table to table and they have to
finish whatever is at the first table, and then move on to the second. And the
80

kindergarten teacher said that Amos, I mean Isaiah was her most outgoing
student, but really did not care to finish what was on the table, which was true. It
didn't matter to him what was on the table. So he has done music (in
homeschooling) that has helped him immensely. And we do physical therapy with
him because he has fine skill motor issues.
Connie continued with her recollection of the events by saying,
Oh, he loved it (kindergarten). He loves people. We have people come over, he
loves people. It was the teacher (who) said he would not flourish in their new
whatever it's called, their new structure (that) was (a) self-directed structure. And
Isaiah, as sweet as he was, is not self-directed; or that's what the teacher said.
Connie and Josh followed their comments regarding Isaiah by remembering their
conversation with the kindergarten teacher and by concluding that the teacher “did not ever use
the word homeschool, but she said that he would not do well in the self-directed (program).”
When I asked if she suggested that he repeat kindergarten, Connie said,
I don't believe that she would have the ability to, I think she was trying to say
send him, there is so many private schools around here and of course, Andrea
when she was homeschooled worked in the elementary, and we were
homeschooling Fred. She never mentioned the word homeschool, but she knew
we were homeschooling Fred and Andrea.
In much the same way as homeschooling became second nature to Connie and Josh; it
just made sense to Lindy and Ken to continue homeschooling after they found that
homeschooling worked for their eldest daughter, Alexandra. Ken said that Lindy had already
used Alexandra as the guinea pig for homeschooling and if it worked for her it would work for
their younger children, Michelle and Tim. Lindy commented that, “Allison was like the guinea
pig for everything. As we learned from her experiences, it was much easier as the other two
came through.”
When Julica was discussing her experience homeschooling she never really considered
doing anything else with her younger children. However, Julica did comment on the fact that her

81

eldest child Norah was easy to teach because she caught on to things so easily. As she talked
about her second daughter, Julia, she said,
By that time my second daughter had come up and she was not nearly as quick to
catch on to things. She definitely would have been lost in the classroom. She
would have been on that bottom tier that (was) just kind of high enough to be
pulled along but low enough to struggle.
Other interviewees explained their decision-making process regarding their subsequent
children. For example, Tina said that because she was homeschooling the two older boys, the
third boy just joined into the learning activities. She talked about them and drew a comparison to
them like they were a class. She told me,
They learned together I think. It’s pretty much like a little class. I didn't have to
teach my third son how to read. (He) listened to (his) two older brothers and they
learned all at the same time. (He was) always following along fine. He is very
sharp auditory learner, so he could hear everything and remember; which is an
advantage. Thank God for giving me a son like that. There are so close in age,
the first one and third one only two and a half years (apart). The first one and
second one are only one year (apart).
When discussing her experience homeschooling her children, Jessica talked about the fact
that by the time she began homeschooling her second daughter, Lynette, she already knew Latin
from listening to her mom teach her older sister Ellen. The transition from not being
homeschooled to being homeschooled was almost imperceptible because as Jessica commented,
“Lynette is a little more like me, she wants to know everything about everything. Why does it
work that way?” Since it seemed as though Lynette was ready to learn because she had absorbed
much of what Ellen was learning, Jessica said, “So Lynette just started kindergarten at four
because she was ready.”
The information resulting from the analysis of the subsequent children revealed that most
of the families were like Jessica’s where the children began homeschooling when they were
ready. Some began with preschool, some with kindergarten and some, as noted in the case of
82

Connie and Josh’s family, began when the parents believed that homeschooling was appropriate.
As is evident from the pie graph below [Figure 4.2], in ninety-six percent of the decisions to
homeschool subsequent children, the parents followed the sequential decision-making process.
This correlates to twenty-seven out of twenty-eight cases where the parents revealed that they
believed that because homeschooling was working or was the most appropriate choice for their
initial child it was the best choice for their other children.
Figure 4.2. Decision-Making Process for Subsequent Children When Beginning to Homeschool
Convergence
4%
Insightful
0%

Anarchical
0%
Iterative
Sequence
0%

Sequential
96%

Linkages
0%

Only one of the subsequent children in the study fit into the convergence decisionmaking process when she began to homeschool. Thinking about the lens that depicts the
convergence pathway, it was evident through the analysis that the model reveals that the process
unfolded from the origination of the initial idea of thinking about homeschooling. The process
proceeded with this family steadily, little by little focusing on the final decision. This decisionmaking pathway included areas of distinct, discrete and tangible concrete phenomena that were
considered in a responsive environment based upon culture, beliefs, opinions, and experience as

83

the schooling options were narrowed towards the final choice of homeschooling (Langley et al.,
1995).
Beginning with their son Amos, Connie and Josh had homeschooled their first three
children for one year when they were in sixth grade. When their fourth child, Marilyn reached
sixth grade she did not want to be homeschooled and asked her parents if she could continue
attending school. At that point Connie and Josh believed that she would never experience
homeschooling. When Marilyn was in eighth grade she contracted a debilitating inner ear
condition and lost her balance. Due to her condition, she was unable to move from class to class
or last all day in school. Her parents worked with the school so Marilyn could continue learning
through her regular classes. While they knew from the beginning that it was possible to
homeschool, they evaluated their options as they traversed through a chaotic environment.
Connie talked about her experience as she tried to work with the school. She said,
The school wanted her to be considered permanently disabled. We said we would
not sign that she was permanently disabled because… she wasn't. They did not
send homework home and we got a report card and she got straight D's, E's and
F's. So I went to the school and I said “I have no recourse (but) to homeschool.”
They were very nice. They said “We'll give you books.”
Connie and Josh homeschooled their daughter for the balance of her eighth grade school year.
Marilyn returned to school the following year after her health improved and never had to be
labeled disabled.
For the subsequent children, the majority of the families in the study followed the
straight-forward, logical pathway of sequential decision-making. Through this process families
honed in on their final selection of homeschooling through a thoughtful pathway that followed a
finely planned conduit made up of stages of research plateaus, defined moments assessing

84

alternatives and educational options and movement towards the final implementation of their
choice (Langley et al., 1995).

4.6 Discontinuing Homeschooling
During the analysis phase I found that 21 out of the 42 children in the study discontinued
homeschooling and moved or returned to a school setting after being homeschooled [Table 4.3].
Table 4.3. Traits of Families who Discontinued Homeschooling
Chrystal

Hannah

Lindy
& Ken

Child’s traits
caused an end to
homeschooling
(HS)
Child’s request to
end HS
HS worked for
initial child
Finances swayed
placement
Interaction with
school
Concerned about
academics
Hesitate end due to
knowledge
Kids want to be
with friends
Research/visited
schools
Finished HS &
began college
Child has faith &
will be okay
Planned return to
school
Reconsider HS
yearly
End due to parental
circumstances
85

Connie

Deb Tina

Janice

Karis

Out of the fourteen families, eight had at least one child who discontinued
homeschooling. The majority of the children in the study who discontinued homeschooling
came from families who followed the sequential decision-making process when they stopped
homeschooling their children [as depicted in figure 4.3].
Figure 4.3. Decision-Making Process for Discontinuing to Homeschool
Convergence
14%
Iterative
Sequence
0%

Anarchical
5%

Insightful
0%
Linkages
0%
Sequential
81%
The study indicated that as some of the families’ homeschooled their children, their daily
process and levels of academic success moved them little by little towards their decision to
discontinue homeschooling their children due to their child’s level of achievement or perceived
level of need for additional programming. Out of the twenty-one children who moved to a
school setting following their experience with homeschooling, there were two students who
completed their homeschooling curriculum at the end of their junior year of high school and one
who only took two homeschool classes during his senior year of high school. Considering the
two students who finished their homeschool curriculum at the end of their junior year of high
school, the parents considered them “dually enrolled” because they took college classes their
senior year of high school, but not through the local public school. Both of the students took
86

online classes from a Christian college and one of them also took courses at the local community
college. They finished high school early because of their progress and accelerated pace. Lindy
and Ken’s eldest daughter, Alexandra and second child, Michelle, both discontinued
homeschooling when they began taking college classes. Lindy talked about her second daughter
during her interview, “Michelle is a senior in high school, but she is not doing any classes at
home. She is attending the community college dually enrolled. She is taking almost all her
classes there.” Her husband chimed in and said, “Yes, she is going full time at the community
college.” Lindy calmly clarified Michelle’s status and said, “Yes, she is a full time student but
she does have two online classes through a Christian university.” Lindy continued to elaborate
by saying, “She is all college. Yes, basically she is doing her first year of college.” Making sure
I understood, Ken said, “She has finished all of the requirements for high school. But we
thought well, technically age-wise she is still a senior, so we would have her dual enrolled high
school-college.” Similarly, Janice’s son Jack, when he reached his senior year of high school
had finished most of his homeschool classes. Jack was able to convince his parents to allow him
to finish his last two homeschooling classes and to dual enroll at the local community college.
For the eight families who discontinued homeschooling, their decision was made up of
various thoughts, evaluations of schooling options, deliberation and reduction of thoughts. I
also observed that as children aged, they had a greater voice in their schooling choice. Isaiah
was the second of four children who were homeschooled by their mother, Chrystal. As he
approached high school his ability to learn in the homeschooling environment was not to his
liking. He believed that if he went to a school, he would be more successful due to the
predictability of the schedule. After discussing his concerns with his parents, they allowed him
to attend a Christian school. Another high school student, Larry, also asked his parents if he

87

could quit homeschooling and attend the local public school because of a specialized art
program. After discussion and some research, his parents agreed and moved him to the local
public school.
Three other children who discontinued homeschooling and followed the sequential model
of decision-making belonged to Debbie and Don’s family. Because their father fell terminally
ill, the children were forced to end homeschooling and begin attending the local public school.
Debbie’s husband, Don, began to fall ill in the spring. Initially she balanced homeschooling,
cleaning the house, and providing care for her ill husband. During the summer as Don’s needs
became greater, Debbie believed that she could not take care of her husband and provide quality
homeschooling for her children. As Debbie talked about discontinuing homeschooling her
children she said,
When I really stopped homeschooling was when Don got sick. He was diagnosed
with cancer at the end of May in '09. He had pretty much been bed-ridden the
month before he was diagnosed. He was healthy, or at least seemingly so before
that. During the spring of '09 his back started bothering him and within a couple
of months he was bedridden. So that summer he was in the hospital for five
weeks or so and he needed constant care. He could not be by himself. That
summer we realized that there was no option to homeschool; they would have to
go to school.
Similar to the other families who followed the sequential pathway when they
discontinued homeschooling their children, Debbie’s family followed a logical step by step
sequence, working through their options and narrowing their decision-making process to a final
choice.
Fourteen percent of the children who discontinued homeschooling followed the
convergence method of decision-making. Those who followed the convergence pathway
towards the discontinuance of homeschooling began with an inkling of interest in moving their
children to school. As they continued investigating and thinking about their child’s learning
88

environment, they moved through distinct, discrete and concrete reflections regarding their
homeschooling experience. Moving towards the families’ ultimate choice, their beliefs and
opinions narrowed the pathway towards their final choice to end homeschooling their child. Tina
and Tom followed the convergence method when they discontinued homeschooling two of their
three boys and their daughter. With each child, Tina, who had difficulties speaking English
because she was raised in another country began thinking about discontinuing homeschooling
her children, but hesitated as she found herself at the mercy of her thoughts and concerns
impinged by culture, beliefs and point of view as she and her husband narrowed their choice to
discontinue homeschooling for their child. Tina talked about her concerns for her children
during her interview. She explained her feelings about discontinuing to homeschool her children
and her anxiousness regarding their academic abilities, “I am going to have three boys to go to
college.” She continued by talking about her concerns,
I noticed my boys (were) very quiet and I think that it was part of my problem
because I did not really teach them discuss when they were doing reading. I
followed the book, the curriculum, and asked them questions, not like (a) normal
American family; they bring up more heavy discussion, they use deeper or bigger
words to let them hear it (and) use it. They (will) be able to (do) better in
language (and do) better in writing (at school).
Tina continued by talking about her experience discontinuing her children from
homeschooling. While deciding to discontinue homeschooling her fourth child, Grace, Tina and
Tom followed the convergence decision-making pathway. Grace was homeschooling alone
when her brothers moved to high school and college. Tina explained how important it was for
homeschooled children to be part of activities. She went on by saying,
There is another part of homeschool(ing). You have to drive a lot to different
places for their actual curriculum activities and so she (will) have friends and to
learn together and play together. That kind of interaction is very important.

89

As Tina continued explaining her thoughts regarding discontinuing homeschooling Grace, she
said,
At this age she loves friends; that is important. I love the atmosphere to do all the
things together. When I was that age especially in middle school it I had lots of
good friends and we do things together. I thought it would be a good time to send
her to school. She is outgoing and also it is hard for me.
Discontinuing homeschooling under the anarchical decision-making process applied to
only five percent of the children, which amounted to one child out of the twenty-one children
who discontinued homeschooling. The family whose pathway to discontinuing homeschooling
their child followed the anarchical process stumbled along an inconsistent, chaotic avenue.
While the family intended to avoid negative outcomes, the decision pathway was influenced by
friends, families, ideology, values and experience.
Following the anarchical pathway to decide to discontinue homeschooling their daughter
was difficult for Janice and Bradford. They had great concerns with their home environment
while homeschooling their eighth grade daughter, Kelly. She kept things fairly chaotic and
uneasy. Since she had already attended a Christian school from preschool to second grade and a
charter school from third grade until half way through sixth grade, they were unsure of where to
turn. As they went through ups and downs with Kelly, they made the decision to discontinue
homeschooling her at the end of eighth grade. During this process to discontinue homeschooling
their daughter, they found themselves in a twirling, up and down disconcerted extreme problem
and emotion filled process. Janice talked about the experience homeschooling her difficult
daughter by telling me,
Some days it is like from the minute you wake up to the time everybody goes to
bed, that (teaching Kelly) is all I've been doing all day. That's kind of Kelly’s
MO; she could do a little bit, and then take a breather, but I had to make sure she
was done with it and made that our goal. Sometimes it would be eight o'clock;
she was just testing me. That went on the whole time we homeschooled.
90

Janice continued to set the stage for their decision to discontinue homeschooling Kelly. She
explained,
I think that every day was a struggle. That was relational; it had nothing to do
with homeschooling. Except it affected homeschooling. I think I didn't give up
on her, but there has to be a place that she will not be miserable all day long.
Janice and Bradford’s decision after going through the anarchical process gave their daughter an
opportunity to attend high school with her friends. While things were not perfect after she
discontinued homeschooling, it led to a calmer home environment.
During the analysis phase of this study, it became apparent that the parents believed they
knew their children and were well keyed-in to the best learning environment for their child. It
was also evident that when children presented parents with requests to begin or discontinue
homeschooling, the parents did not always find that their child’s request matched with what they
believed was in their best interest. In one case, Chrystal allowed her son to attend school, but
talked about not allowing her daughters Camille and Georgia, to discontinue homeschooling and
attend the local school. She explained her thoughts,
Camille (wanted to discontinue homeschooling), but not for the right reasons. I
didn’t think it was going to help her education or her spiritual walk for the reasons
she wanted to go, and she was honest with me. I could kind of see where she was
going. If you go to school because you think it’s cool, it’s not where you should
go. Isaiah had reasons for going, logical reasons; they have the same schedule all
the time – that is going to help. Certain classes on certain days, if it is consistent
he will be more successful. His argument that he will be more successful was
convincing. David and I wanted nothing more than for him to be successful.
Camille had (wanted to discontinue homeschooling) for the wrong reasons; it was
social. It was so she could remove the homeschool nametag so that she could be
someone else. In an age when you don’t know yourself very well and you are
willing to try a new identity, it is most important to know who you are in Christ. I
said this isn’t going to help you; it is just going to continue your uncertainty.
Then Georgia is thirteen and she has friends and wants to go to school for the
same social reason. She wanted to join a swim team not because she’s good at
swimming, but because her friends swim and she would get to see her friends at
practice.
91

It was obvious by listening to Chrystal, much like the other mothers, that parents of
homeschoolers grew close to their children and could evaluate their requests on several levels
spiritual, social, and academic. By reviewing all of the occasions that led to discontinuing
homeschooling, it was evident that steps were followed and critical research was completed prior
to the final choice.

4.7 Summary
The data for this study was gained from interviews with parents from fourteen families
who either were homeschooling or had homeschooled their children. The analysis of the
decision-making process began with the primary motivating thought regarding the child’s
learning environment. The analysis continued to follow the parents along the decision-making
pathway all the way to the culminating final choice to begin or discontinue homeschooling their
children. This decision-making process applied to young children who had not yet started
kindergarten as well as children who were attending a school whether public, charter, or private.
Of the fourteen families the analysis found that in twelve cases parents made the decision to
homeschool for their first child and in two of the families, the initial decision to homeschool was
made based around circumstances regarding the education of the second child. In two of the
cases where the initial decision to homeschool was made regarding the second child, the first
child had attended school with virtually no concerns. During the analysis it became clear that in
the four decision-making models that were followed, the schooling choice for the initial child
was a critical and complex process filled with thoughtful research, conversations with
homeschooling friends and contemplation regarding faith implications. During the study it

92

became evident that when the parents initiated the decision-making process researching and
spending time talking to each other and with their friends they made a life-changing realization.
The analysis of the research revealed that the course of the decision-making process was
critical as parents contemplated a move to homeschooling or consider discontinuing teaching
their children at home. The analysis included a description of the route or pathway parents
followed when pursuing the final decision regarding the appropriate learning environment for
their child. Detailed data analysis revealed four decision-making pathways that were used by the
fourteen families: convergence, sequential, iterative sequence and insightful. The findings of the
study revealed that out of fourteen homeschooling decisions for the initial child, the majority of
the choices were determined to belong to one of two decision-making processes: convergence or
insightful. The analysis of the data also revealed some unexpected results that emerged from the
focused investigation into the decision-making pathways. As parents shared their recollections
of the pathway to the final choice to begin homeschooling their child, they revealed that the
decision-making processes did not fall into the anarchical or linkages groups.

93

CHAPTER 5: FINDINGS ON THE CIRCUMSTANCES THAT PRECIPITATED THE
ACTIVATION OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS

5.1 Circumstances
This chapter contains a discussion of key circumstances surrounding the specific events,
conditions, and characteristics that initiated the decision-making process. Regardless of the
progression that families followed, all families began the decision-making process with an initial
concern or thought that propelled them to investigate homeschooling as a possible educational
choice. The situation that precipitated a parent’s move toward the decision flowed from one or
more of the circumstances described in this chapter. The circumstances that precipitated [Figure
5.1] the family to begin the decision-making process are defined as belonging to four areas:
specific events, conditions of schools and families, characteristics of parents, and characteristics
of the children.
Figure 5.1 Percentage in Each of the Four Types of Precipitating Circumstances.
Events
14%

Characteristics
of Child
12%

Conditions of
Schools and
Families
22%

Characteristics
of Parent
52%

In general the circumstances do not exist alone, but rather appear in groups such as in the
case of Debbie and Don’s family [as seen in Table 5.1]. There are multiple circumstances
impacting the atmosphere that existed prior to the beginning of the decision-making process.
The situations that precipitated a parent’s decision to move their children to homeschool or to
94

discontinue homeschooling stream from one or more of the four defined circumstances. For
example, as depicted in Debbie’s row, she has a specific event (her child has a negative school
experience), three conditions (disability or health concern, mom stays home with her children,
and faith concerns) and seven parental characteristics (she was concerned to homeschool, she
had both a general and a specific academic concern, her husband had difficulties in school, she
grew to believe she could teach her children, and she had friends who homeschooled). She also
has a block in the child characteristics area (child illness/disability). These areas of
circumstances are fully discussed and analyzed in following sections.
Table 5.1. Circumstances Precipitating the Decision-Making Process

95

The type of circumstances that precipitated a family’s move to initiate the decisionmaking process to start or discontinue homeschooling reveals that thirteen families (ninety-three
percent) disclosed at least one precipitating circumstance in each of the categories and only one
family (seven percent) had precipitating circumstances in only three of the categories [as
depicted in Figure 5.2].
Figure 5.2. Percentages of Families that Disclosed Precipitating Circumstances in Various
Categories (Specific Events, Conditions of Schools and Families, Characteristics of Parents and
Characteristics of Child)
Three
Categories
7%

One Category
0%
Two Categories
0%

Four
Categories
93%

5.2 Specific Events
Specific events describe an occurrence or incident that influenced parents to consider
beginning or discontinuing homeschooling their child. The study determined that events
precipitating the movement toward homeschooling are comprised of conflicts with their child’s
school experience or with school personnel or an occasion when the child asks to be
homeschooled. The percentage of events that were revealed during the interviews and were
considered to be a circumstance that precipitated the decision-making process to begin or
discontinue homeschooling is illustrated in Figure 5.3.
96

Figure 5.3 Percentage of Events that Precipitated the Decision-Making Process to Begin or
Discontinue Homeschooling

Child's request
9%

Neg. School
Experience
36%

Parent
Researched HS
55%

An example of an event was when Jack, an eighth grade student in a private Christian
school, was assaulted during a school trip by some students who had bullied him previously. As
Janice began telling me the story of the assault, she prefaced her comments by saying,
He had a really good seventh grade experience, then in eighth grade, (he began) to
be bullied, (with) people picking on him. He wouldn't let us do anything about it.
We talked to his teachers, and he didn't want us to call other parents. It wasn't
that rough that we had to intervene.
Before they left on the trip, Jack had requested to be separated from the two students he
perceived as bullies for the overnight accommodations. Janice continued, with passion, to talk
about what happened on that trip.
Jack asked not to be put in a room with two certain boys, I don't know how they
heard this, but he and his friend were put in with these two boys. And they
wrapped him up in blankets and beat on him. I thought that something had
happened to him sexually because he was so broken hearted, but nobody stopped
it and the chaperones weren't really paying attention to what was going on. He
had so been looking forward to the trip and just was terrorized the whole time and
I just never could get beyond that. One of the kids did not come back (to school
in the fall), so they never did anything to him except tell his parents that he did
this. So we didn't feel like there was any vindication and justice. The other one
called and apologized, and we had to accept it.

97

After hearing about the incident, Jack’s parents Janice and Bradford contacted the school.
It took several weeks for a school representative to return their inquiry and there were no
consequences for the two boys. The school representative said that since this incident took place
at the end of the school year, it was not fair to punish the boys at the beginning of the next school
year. This event precipitated the parents to contemplate moving their son to homeschooling and
was influential in his parent’s eventual decision a year later when they chose to teach him at
home.
Another instance of a precipitating event was described with passion by the mother,
Connie. When her son, Fred, was in first grade he suddenly became ill and showed signs of
damage to his central nervous system. Fred also began exhibiting characteristics of epilepsy.
Connie sought immediate medical attention for her son and was told that Fred’s condition looked
as though it was brought about by chemical poisoning. She continued on and explained that,
He had the symptoms from the pesticides and he was damaged. We went to a
pediatric neurologist and did, you know those forty-eight- hour things where they
watched him and he (the doctor) said that he (Fred) had lesions in his brain and if
we were careful (the lesions) might heal and they seemed to have healed. We
don't know but he seemed to have awful reactions to pesticides.
When Connie contacted the school to inquire as to what chemicals they used in the
learning environment, she was told that they had not changed any cleaning solutions. She asked
her child’s teacher if she had any ideas and the teacher admitted that she was tired of having
insects in the classroom, so she had used a “bug bomb” over the vacation from school. Connie
told me that the teacher was very apologetic and said she wished she had wiped off the desks
after using the insecticide. At that point, Fred was already under the care of a physician and
Connie felt she had no other choice than to begin homeschooling her son. Although Connie was
terribly concerned about her son, it appeared as though it was a straightforward choice for

98

Connie and her husband, Josh, eased by their previous experience homeschooling three of their
older children - Fred’s brothers, Amos and Jacob and his sister, Andrea. Amos and Andrea had
spent their sixth grade school year being homeschooled and Jacob was at that time being
homeschooled for sixth grade.
The following is an instance where the event was the discovery of a poor learning climate
in the classroom, which gives the case an element of belonging to the circumstance defined as a
condition of the school. This is the case of Kelly who was in a classroom where the situation
was believed to be too disorganized for optimal learning. Kelly, a bright young sixth grade
student who had recently been diagnosed with Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD), was attending
a local charter school that had experienced a period of immense growth. Kelly’s mother Janice,
a social worker by training, was excited by the school’s curriculum and educational philosophy.
Janice was so enthusiastic about the school’s successful track record that she earned a position as
an instructional aide and substitute teacher. One day Janice was assigned to substitute in Kelly’s
classroom. As Janice explained the condition of Kelly’s classroom, she said, “One day I was
subbing in sixth grade and there was Kelly and all these rowdy people. She continued by
revealing that during the day she noticed that Kelly seemed lost and in her own world, seeming
not to learn anything. Even though Kelly had just been diagnosed with ADD, she was surprised
about Kelly’s lack of engagement in the classroom. Janice continued describing her feelings by
saying,
I wondered; how can she learn? Are we giving her the best that we can? And
sitting in there that day, I said this is not the best for her. And right about that
time we found out that she had ADD.
Janice seemed surprised at the condition of the classroom learning environment and the level of
misbehavior exhibited by Kelly’s classmates. “Their education is superior, but there are needy

99

kids. Just seeing the kids who got the attention and the good kids, who did their work, are they
getting what they need or are they just getting by?” said Janice. Her experience substituting in
Kelly’s classroom made Janice and her husband Bradford question their decision to send their
children to that particular charter school. Janice commented that she felt, “If there was another
place for them to be and I could come alongside of someone then that's okay, but then it got to
the point where that's not working.” As Janice investigated schooling options, she talked to
friends, perused websites, visited the local homeschooling group and even read a book about
homeschooling on their family’s Christmas vacation cruise.
When school started in January, Janice informed the charter school that she would leave
her position and stay home with her daughter. Even with her concerns regarding the situation
she found in Kelly’s classroom, she allowed her son to continue attending the charter school
through the end of the school year. During the interview it was obvious she still felt bad about
leaving the charter school. She explained her feelings by telling me,
It was a loss, I had to go in and explain what was going on. It turned into what
their vision was for education, it didn't stay at what we hoped it would stay. It
was not fulfilling their needs. They didn't fail us; they did what they said they
would do. They have a wonderful program, but it got too big.

5.3 Events that Precipitated Discontinuance of Homeschooling
Parents who discontinued homeschooling may have found themselves or their children
influenced by events that precipitate their investigation of alternative schooling options other
than homeschooling. Events that precipitated families discontinuing homeschooling for their
children included the child’s request to go to school or a positive interaction with educators
while researching or visiting schools. In a number of cases, the event was that the students
themselves requested that their parents enroll them in school because they had particular interests

100

that were not being met at home. For example, Larry was homeschooled from pre-kindergarten
through his junior year of high school. During the middle of his junior year, Larry told his
parents he was interested in attending a college that focused on graphic art. In Larry’s
homeschooling program he did not have an opportunity to explore and upgrade his skills in
graphic arts and he wanted to spend his senior year of high school focusing on his central
interest: art. After encouraging his parents to consider allowing him to investigate art programs
at area schools, he was able to find an appropriate school placement. His mother, Hannah talked
about Larry’s request by telling me, “He had the desire to go to school. He went to school with a
bunch of really good kids who went to local public school. He thought he wanted to try the high
school experience before he went to college.”
Another high school student in the study, Isaiah, was concerned that he was not achieving
like he should in his homeschooling curriculum. Many of his friends attended traditional school,
both public and private Christian. After spending time talking to them about his concerns, he
approached his parents and inquired about the chances of his attending school. He discussed his
concerns regarding his learning environment and explained that a traditional school placement
would give him more structure and, as he figured, a better opportunity to succeed. As Chrystal
talked about Isaiah, she said,
He wanted that routine, because in homeschool you don’t have the same schedule
every day. Well some people do, but we don’t have the same schedule every
single day because we go to different lessons. If you have lessons or tutors, that
makes that day different. But for Isaiah, it is difficult to have different schedules,
so he wanted that consistency. He wanted to try that.
Some of the events also have a relationship to the condition of a family or a school. In
the case of Debbie and Don, the specific event that precipitated their children returning to school
was Don’s diagnosis with terminal cancer. This specific event led to a condition in the family

101

where Debbie found she was unable to continue homeschooling her three children. Debbie
described the situation by explaining he originally became ill in the spring. When he worsened
during the summer they decided that she could not continue homeschooling their three children.
She ended by telling me,
Then we couldn't afford to send them to Christian school, I couldn't drive them
anywhere. God knew this was going to happen, so they are ready for school.
This event also could be extended into the next section: conditions of schools and
families. Due to the change in the health conditions in Debbie and Don’s family, the children
discontinued homeschooling and returned to school.

5.4 Conditions of Schools and Families
In the study, the conditions of schools and families included child health concerns, the
diagnosis of ADD or dyslexia, along with a particular criterion based upon a specific time line,
such as a planned return to a traditional school following a defined length of time spent
intentionally homeschooling a particular child. During the research and analysis of the data, the
findings revealed that twenty-two percent of the time, conditions of schools and families were
considered as precipitating circumstances for a parent to begin on the decision-making pathway
to start or stop homeschooling their children. Circumstances in this study, that were defined as
conditions of schools and families were disability or health of a member of the family, the
mother staying home to care for her children, and when the parent indicated that they were
concerned with faith in regard to schooling. Their faith concerns also included in some cases
that they prayed for guidance or that they felt God was urging or telling them to homeschool.
Percentages of the conditions cited as being circumstances that precipitated the decision-making
process to begin or discontinue homeschooling is depicted in Figure 5.4.
102

Figure 5.4 Percentages of Conditions of Schools and Families Precipitating the DecisionMaking Process to Begin or Discontinue Homeschooling
Disability or
Health
Concern
27%
Faith Concern
40%

Mom Stays
Home
33%
Precipitating conditions may include the fact that because the mother already was staying
home with the children homeschooling seemed intuitive. During my interview with Lindy and
her husband Ken they spoke about the precipitating conditions of the school and of their family.
They discussed the fact that a qualifying provision for homeschooling was that Lindy was at
home with her two younger children. Ken brought up the subject by saying, “She was home.
She was home with our other two kids and she was a teacher and passionate about education
(and) literature. It seemed like a really good fit.”
The study also revealed that the parents’ affiliation with a homeschool-friendly church or
their concern about the lack of faith in the public school were conditions that may have
precipitated the decision-making process. In some families conditions were present that included
the fact that the parents prayed for God’s guidance. Identified conditions also included the
parents’ belief that God was encouraging them to homeschool their children. When Jessica was
talking about her thoughts prior to homeschooling she remembered,
Mostly I just prayed about it. It was kind of one of those things that God can put
on your heart long enough that you can either accept it or reject it. So in the end,
I figured I could give them a better education, true or not.
103

Similarly, when Hannah and Justin were contemplating homeschooling she said, “I
remember praying about it with Justin.” Chrystal too prayed for God’s guidance in selecting the
appropriate learning environment for her daughter, Camille. As Chrystal talked about her
recollections of her initial thoughts while investigating whether she should begin homeschooling
her eldest daughter, she said, “Then God started to work on my heart and He said, ‘See, see this
is something I have for you.’ God was just persistent and I prayed about it.” One parent told me
that as she and her husband were looking for a different learning environment for their children
who were attending a Christian school, they seemed to have ignored God. Janice and Bradford
were searching for the best educational placement for their children. When they began thinking
about the optimal learning environment, she mentioned, “I don’t know if I listened to God
closely, I think some of it was I just didn't want to do that.” At that point she moved her children
from a Christian school to a charter school. It wasn’t until later that she acquiesced to what she
thought might have been God’s direction to homeschool her two children.
Some of the families in the study had beliefs that precipitated self-imposed conditions on
their child’s eventual learning environment. Several of the families were interested in integrating
faith instruction into their child’s learning environment but could not afford to send their children
to Christian school, so they chose to homeschool. Katrina talked about her experience looking
for the best educational placement for her son Jonathan. She said,
Jonathan must have been three or four and we were trying to decide what to do for
school. We had first considered sending him to a lady who does a preschool (and)
kindergarten out of her house and I had him enrolled. I was at a friend’s house,
and my friend had a daughter in it and she’s like, “Katrina don’t send him because
he knows more than Malia does. The teacher is wonderful, but he’s beyond that.”
Katrina said that before having children she earned a bachelor’s degree in secondary English
education, a master’s degree in curriculum, and had taught for eight years. As Katrina evaluated

104

her options, she decided that she did not want to send her son to a public school and her family
finances were not adequate to support Jonathan’s attendance at a private Christian school. For
Katrina and her husband Devon, the conditions that existed in their family were faith and
finances. After researching homeschooling, talking to friends who had experience educating
their children at home and discussing the idea with her husband, Devon, she chose to
homeschool her son. She continued to describe the situation by telling me,
I was well aware of what the local public school district does for kindergarten,
and I was like “I can do that.” …Having taught in the public schools I didn’t
want… (what existed in the public schools) for my kids and I can’t afford
Christian schools. So that became homeschooling.
Often parents found themselves subject of several conditions. During the analysis of the
data, I found examples where a family condition existed simultaneously with a school condition.
In the following case of Randie and her children, changes in family income paralleled with her
impression of the lack of enrichment at the local public school, which precipitated her launch
into a decision-making process regarding her children’s education. Randie’s son attended an
excellent but somewhat expensive Christian school about twenty minutes away from her home.
Her daughter Brielle was ready to begin kindergarten. As she talked about the situation she said,
I wasn't working and changes in my husband's employment made it so that it
really wasn't feasible to send two kids to private school… I had three options and
we lived way over here. (We could) send Ronald and Brielle to the local public
school, homeschool or actually I had four options, go back to work, or move. So
four options and … I had a summer to make that decision.
When Randie met with the first grade teachers at the local public school to discuss
sending her oldest child, Ronald to their school, she learned that the school did not have the
ability to offer enrichment classes. After reviewing the local public school’s curriculum, Randie
discussed the situation with the teachers and was informed that her first grader would be placed
by ability in third grade. Since Ronald was small and shy, Randie was concerned and asked if
105

they could differentiate the first grade curriculum to accommodate his learning needs. When the
teachers told her that they had no opportunity to give him the learning options he would need,
Randie began to evaluate her other options. Since she was moving him from the area Christian
school due to changes in her finances, she contemplated electing to send him via school of
choice to another public school or beginning teach him at home. Clearly, given the fact that this
study drew from a sample of Christian families, the prevalence of faith concerns was expected.
Yet, it is still interesting that this was a central factor in thirteen of the fourteen cases.

5.5 Conditions of Schools and Families that Precipitated Discontinuance of Homeschooling
The conditions of schools and families that precipitated the initiation of a decisionmaking process to discontinue homeschooling may have varied in order to approximate elements
of the situation. As parents continued teaching their children at home they experienced
conditions that provided the impetus to begin thinking about discontinuing homeschooling their
children. Conditions that spurred parents to begin contemplating discontinuing the education of
their children at home included concerns regarding a school placement, finances, and parental
circumstances.
Some of the circumstances discovered during the study regarding conditions that
prompted parents to consider discontinuing homeschooling included several instances where
children finished their high school homeschooling classes and wanted to move on to college as
dual-enrolled students. For example, when Alexandra finished her homeschooling curriculum at
the end of eleventh grade, she began to work with her mother Lindy to plan for her senior year of
school. Her parents had informed her that she was too young to go to off to the college she was
dreaming of attending in a state almost ten hours away. When Lindy and Ken researched the

106

opportunities for her senior year, they found that Alexandra could take online college classes less
expensively than she could participate in supplemental homeschooling programs. Ken
commented on the cost of college versus homeschooling classes. He told me,
For Alexandra, she was going to go to a particular college. That is where she
wanted to go and while we were investigating I found out that they had an online
program, so that gave me an idea. The classes for that were the same prices as the
homeschool classes. That’s what it was; they were discounted because she was a
high school student. So I had it figured out. Well, instead of paying for the
homeschool classes let's have her take these online classes and start toward her
education at her chosen college.
Ken continued by commenting on his younger daughter, Michelle who also discontinued
homeschooling by saying,
We realized that with the community college our kids could, all of a sudden, get
college credit and that would reduce the time they would be in college, which
would reduce our expense. I think it was economically driven the way I saw it.
Both Alexandra and Michelle earned college credit during their senior year of high school.
When I asked Lindy and Ken why Michelle took classes at the local community college, unlike
her sister who took online classes, they told me that,
For Michelle, what she wants to do, they don't offer that major at the Christian
college so I didn't want her to take something that wouldn't transfer to
somewhere. I thought that most of the basic classes at the community college
would transfer to somewhere else.
Because it worked so well for the two girls, Ken and Lindy talked about the fact that they were
contemplating allowing their son Tim to also take college classes during his senior year of high
school.
Similar to the situation with Michelle and Alexandra, Jack took college classes during his
senior year of high school. He still had a couple of homeschooling classes to finish, but the rest
of his time he spent taking classes at the local community college. Jack’s mother, Janice talked
about the positive effect college has had on Jack’s confidence. She said, “Going to college has
107

really helped him. He knows what a syllabus is and he is bigger now; he is six foot three. In
ninth grade he was so little. Jack is getting confidence by taking the college classes.” In the case
of Alexandra, Michelle, and Jack, the conditions that precipitated discontinuance of
homeschooling were focused on their academic progress. For other families, the family
conditions were focused on the parents.
In the study there were instances of parental conditions that influenced the precipitation
of the initiation of the decision-making process. When interviewing parents for affecting
conditions I found that some parents grew increasingly concerned regarding their child’s
educational readiness for college. One particularly poignant case was regarding a parent who
was raised in a foreign country. Tina was born in Taiwan and had four children. Tina was a
software developer who had earned an Associate’s degree and worked in a local utilities
company instructing coworkers in the use of job embedded software.
Even though Tina had taught her coworkers and had been instructing her children since
they began elementary school, she felt that she did not have adequate skills in teaching English
and writing once her children approached high school age. Tina was hesitant to discontinue
homeschooling her children and researched various options. She eventually came to the
realization that although her children participated in optional homeschooling groups and co-ops,
if she wanted to guarantee that her children would attain appropriate writing and English
language arts proficiency to succeed in college, she would need to move them to a traditional
school setting. Initially she moved her eldest child, Liam, to the nearby suburban school when
he was in eleventh grade. He was followed the next year by her second son, Noah, who also
began in public school as a junior. Seeing the success her two oldest children had in school, she
then moved her third son, Aden to school. With Aden, Tina and her husband Tom felt that he

108

would benefit from repeating ninth grade, so when he began at the school he started as a
freshman. During the interview, Tina commented on Aden’s current progress in high school.
She told me, “He is a junior; I pulled him back a year. He was ahead a year but I pulled him back
and he is just the right age. He’s got all his courses finished.” Her explanation regarding
holding him back a year was that he would be able to take more advanced placement courses in
high school by being ahead. She said,
He is taking three science classes in the same year; one is because the school he
wants to apply for required physics, so he needs to take physics the last year. And
the other two, the chemistry and biology if you take AP (Advanced Placement
courses) then you don't have to take it in college. That will save a lot of money.
And the school he applied to requires you to take an AP class.
For their youngest child, Grace, they had additional concerns. She was going through a
rebellious time in her life, so they researched additional schooling options and settled on sending
her to a local Christian school where she already had friends.
In other instances of family conditions, the parents found educational options that were
more attractive than homeschooling. This attraction to discontinue homeschooling is made up of
both financial conditions similar to Tina and Lindy’s families and, as in the case of Karis, the
concern regarding the immense amount of work preparing the curriculum and daily lessons for
their children. After homeschooling Holden his ninth grade year, Karis began thinking about
moving him from homeschooling to an online charter school due to a proliferation of signs
appearing in the community. She was still very concerned with safety and academics. After
researching the online charter, Karis believed that it provided better curriculum and instruction
for Holden than did homeschooling and it was free. By enrolling him in the online charter
school she would still be able to keep track of his academic progress because he would be

109

working on his school assignments at home. She explained her decision to also move her
daughter Anne to the online charter by telling me that,
The online charter school called us and asked if we wanted to put her in that
program. We started her in the beginning of March.
Karis and her husband believed that homeschooling provided an impetus for her children to learn
about mastery of a subject. While she had focused her children’s education on this critical
element, it took time and effort to provide all of her children’s education. Since they had only
been homeschooling for a short time, Karis and Herb believed that the online charter would
suffice.
Some parents in the study put conditions on homeschooling and were dedicated to
homeschool their child for a defined length of time or for a precise reason, such as increasing
their child’s ability to learn or do their schoolwork. If they did not experience any overwhelming
reasons to maintain homeschooling, they remained true to their plan and discontinued
homeschooling after one year. Connie and her husband Josh planned to homeschool their son
Amos for a year to help him improve his academic skills and his ability to write legibly. They
had become increasingly concerned with Amos’s unreadable handwriting and the fact his school
believed in inventive spelling and allowed the students to move to the next grade with mediocre
achievement. Connie spoke to me about the situation at school; she explained,
He was in fifth grade and we got exercises for him from the public school teacher.
The public school was not willing to investigate his problem. We got them from
the public school teacher who got them from the public school physical therapist.
She continued by saying, “We had a child who could not write, he was going to be in 6th
grade. We were going to send him to a special school.” After researching other options for
Amos, including a boarding school, Connie and Josh began contemplating homeschooling.
Connie was already staying home to care for her younger children and she was confident that her
110

PhD in engineering was adequate preparation for her to teach sixth grade to Amos. At the close
of the year of homeschooling, Amos had progressed to the extent that Connie and Josh believed
he would be successful back at the local public school. She described his amazing progress by
telling me, “It was amazing the difference it made. He went to nationals in the League of
Academic Games. He did a lot better in math and (he) started writing.” While Connie and Josh
valued homeschooling they believed in the public school system and felt that Amos would be
best served by resuming his education at the local school after the sixth grade.

5.6 Characteristics of Parents
Parental characteristics provide a basis of distinguishing qualities that make up the next
area of interest in this study. The characteristics of the parents may be described as substantial
and purposeful. While parents varied in their discussions during their interviews, the study
uncovered the following characteristics: the parent was very concerned with their child’s safety
at school, they noticed the positive traits exhibited by children who were homeschooled, they
were friends with other parents who homeschooled their children, and they did not immediately
dive into homeschooling, but rather had to allay their underlying apprehension of
homeschooling. Several of the parents not only showed the characteristic of having a general
academic concern about schooling options for their child, but had specific concerns about their
child’s learning environment. Several of the fathers in the study were reportedly the victims of
bullying or had been placed in special education programs although they were of above average
intelligence.
During the research and analysis of the data, the findings revealed that fifty-two percent
of the time, characteristics of the parents were considered as precipitating circumstances for a

111

parent to begin on the decision-making pathway to start or stop homeschooling their children.
Circumstances in this study, which were defined as characteristics of the parent were: a voiced
concern for their child’s safety, concerns related to homeschooling, academic concerns, specific
academic concerns, the fact that the father had difficulties when he attended school, the existence
of the father encouraging the mother to homeschool their children, the mother’s belief that she
could teach her children and the existence of friends who homeschool their children.
Percentages of the eight parental characteristics cited as being circumstances that precipitated the
decision-making process to begin or discontinue homeschooling are depicted in Figure 5.5.
Figure 5.5 Percentages of the Identified Characteristics of Parents who Precipitated the DecisionMaking Process.

Spouse
encourages
13%

Dad had
difficulties in
school
5%

Confidence to
teach
15%

HS Friends
17%
Child's Safety
5%

Concern to HS
17%

Academic
Concern
15%

Specific
Concern
13%

Don’s experience in school was not positive. Debbie mentioned that, “When he went to
school he was a very smart man but academically he did very badly. He was dyslexic and that
went undiagnosed.” She continued by saying,
So his experience was really bad. They did not have good resources in place, so
he was in with kids, some of them like were very mentally challenged and he
wasn't. …They didn't know what to do with him.

112

The previous experiences of some of the fathers may be the reason that many of them
encouraged their spouses to begin homeschooling their children. It is interesting to note that
none of the mothers indicated that they had negative experiences in school, in fact some of the
mothers commented on their positive experiences. The group of interviewees predominately
displayed the characteristic of moving from being unsure or doubtful of their ability to
homeschool to believing that they would be able to teach their children, even if only for
kindergarten or first grade. Jessica is representative of the group that believed that their teaching
abilities would suffice for kindergarten. She told me that, “I figured … I couldn't screw up
kindergarten.”
Karis and her husband Herb provide an example of parents who explained that they were
concerned with their children’s safety at school. When Karis’ son, Holden, was attending a
public middle school he experienced bouts of bullying and harassment. Holden, who had some
friends at school, became increasingly concerned with the antics of other students. Influenced by
news reports describing school shootings and brutal assaults, Karis became worried that her
children were not safe and would become victims of school violence. As Karis explained her
feelings to me about having too many special needs children in the classroom without additional
support for the teacher, you could tell it still brought goose bumps when she thought about it,
even today.
And also too, I must admit, the safety in the public schools, even though we have
a little school, you never know what could happen in a little school. Anne was in
a classroom that had two kids in the same classroom, poor teacher, in second
grade, she had two kids with Asperger’s Syndrome. One of the kids I knew
because I worked with him in a daycare one summer so I already had a clue. I
was kind of concerned about him too, about some of the things he could do.
Because one day at the daycare, he brought in a new knife his dad got for when
they went hunting. He brought it to show it to me. That's all it was. He was not
going to do anything with it, I didn't think. But he would get into rampages so I
was kind of worried about that too. I felt like we needed a difference.
113

She talked about the comparison between her school experience where everyone knew
each other to her children’s experience where they only had a few friends and school officials
and teachers seemed powerless to provide a safe environment for her children. After evaluating
the options for her children’s educational environment, she began reading information on
homeschooling, talking to friends, surfing the web, and even calling curriculum companies.
Ultimately, Karis and Herb chose to move their children to homeschooling.
During the interviews several parents commented about their admiration or appreciation
of the traits exhibited by homeschooled children. One especially interesting story gives us an
insight into the impact that the politeness displayed by five young boys had on a young couple.
When Hannah and Justin’s children were just toddlers they joined a group of people who met
weekly to learn Biblically-grounded parenting tips and strategies to successfully raise children.
The family who facilitated the weekly gatherings had five boys. During our interview Hannah
commented on meeting the children,
From the first time we went to their house, all five of their kids greeted us at the
door and said welcome to our home. And they were all so well behaved and such
wonderful kids. That was the first up close exposure to homeschooled kids. They
were aged three to thirteen at that time. And they were great kids.
Hannah continued by telling me that as she watched the family she admired the kids because
“They were such good kids; that’s what I wanted too.”
Janice commented on her husband’s first impression of children, who were
homeschooled by saying,
My six-year-old niece came up to… (my husband) at this pile of rocks that we
had and started telling him the kinds of rocks that were in the pile. He was
impressed and said that we needed to homeschool our kids, and we didn't have
any (children) then.

114

Janice continued on by saying, “They had done a unit on rocks and she remembered it, which is
good. That's more important that they remember what they are taught. That incident was
prominent in the decision (to homeschool) because he saw the fruit (of homeschooling).”
While interviewing, Randie mentioned that she had heard positives and negatives
regarding homeschooling. I asked her how she felt when she was thinking about the pros and
cons of teaching her children at home. She explained by saying that,
I noticed a definite quality of the homeschooled kids that I knew that they could
come up and converse with me, but yet, they could also converse with their peers
and relate and help me with my four year old and help him down off the swing.
They are multi-social. So, anyway that was a positive.
While listening to the interviewees, some of them told me that the fathers were
influenced by their negative experiences when they were in school. Some of the mothers
described their husbands as being identified as “bad boys” due to their inability to sit still in
class. One of the mothers mentioned that her husband, who successfully completed a college
degree and played pro football, spent many hours sitting in the hall because he was wiggly in
class. When interviewing one of the couples, the dad talked about how bored he was in school
and how it affected his confidence in the traditional school experience. Another father who
successful business man and owns a company talked about his children and their high levels of
academic achievement and said it didn’t come from him because he had to work hard his senior
year to graduate with a 1.9 grade point average. Still another mom talked about the difficulties
her husband had due to his undiagnosed dyslexia. As I spoke with Debbie she revealed the
following story about her college graduate husband, Don:
When he went to school he was a very smart man but academically he did very
badly. He was dyslexic and that went undiagnosed. Dyslexic kids and …
Grayson is too, they think very differently, their whole thought process is much
different… Traditional public school doesn't cater to that; they have to cater to
the mass. So Don’s… experience was really bad. They did not have good
115

resources in place so he was in with kids (who)… were very mentally challenged
and he wasn't. …They didn't know what to do with him. When we saw Grayson
at school… Don…didn't want Grayson to have the same experience he had. He
felt very strongly about homeschooling … Grayson. It could have been
somewhat an emotional decision for…(Don).
While speaking about her son, his dyslexia and the connection to his father, who later
died tragically from cancer, it was easy to see that Debbie had obviously moved through a
transformation going from not wanting to homeschool her child to realizing that she had to do
what was best for her kindergartener, Grayson. She said that she was concerned because she
never wanted to be a teacher; her degree was in exercise science. She continued by saying that
her concern was basically academic and that her biggest concern was, as she told me, “How am I
going to teach them what they need to know?” She concluded by telling me that she knew that
she had to begin homeschooling. As she said, “Well, this is what needs to be done, I better do
it.”

5.7 Characteristics of Parents who Discontinued Homeschooling
As I have discussed, there were many characteristics of parents that precipitated a move
to homeschooling and there were also some distinguishing characteristics of parents who began
doubting that homeschooling was the best learning environment for their children. All of the
students who discontinued homeschooling and moved to a school setting had parents who
initially became concerned about their child’s preparation for college, their ability to learn at
home, or their curriculum choices.
After Hannah’s eldest son discontinued homeschooling and began attending a local
public school, Hannah and Justin began thinking about whether their sixteen-year-old second
son, Jason, was being prepared for college. While she wanted the best for her son, Hannah

116

enjoyed having her children at home. She liked working with them and had initially resisted
allowing her eldest son to move to the public school. However she was concerned about Jason.
During our interview she characterized Jason’s homeschooling work ethic: “Jason is a totally
different story. He was never driven on his own; it was I am sitting next to him saying, what is
the answer to this?” The more she and her husband focused on the discovering the optimal
learning environment, the more she became concerned. She continued by telling me, “Jason
wanted a spoon to be fed to you constantly. He would rather I read a book to him than read
himself. I knew that he would probably never need an AP class. I knew he needed to go to
school too, because he needed out.” Justin and Hannah’s concern for Jason led them to search
through options for Jason’s education, give Jason an opportunity for a whole school year to
improve his work ethic, redouble their efforts to find an acceptable school placement, and,
against Jason’s will, make the decision to move Jason to a local Christian school.
Characteristics of parents are related to the characteristics of the children because in
many cases the parents believe that children have assumed features that are identical or similar to
their parents. In cases where the parent was academically advanced when they were a child, they
may believe that their child is also advanced and, correspondingly, if they struggled
academically, they may believe that their child will also struggle. During the analysis of the
characteristics of the parents which precipitated a move to homeschooling, I found that the
synergy in a home environment combined with the propensity of the parents in this study to look
at their friends’ children and identify with their friends’ perceived success at homeschooling,
while contemplating their concerns about their child’s academic learning environment, and their
past experiences in school, resulted in the families’ initial move to investigate homeschooling.

117

The resulting experience was not always the panacea that the parents anticipated, thereby
initiating a pathway leading to the discontinuance of homeschooling.

5.8 Characteristics of the Children
Characteristics of children have precipitated a move to homeschooling by parents. The
characteristics provided a foundation of the child’s distinguishing qualities. The characteristics
of the children may be described as significant and educationally altering.

Characteristics of

the children that precipitated the parental decision-making process included the belief that some
youngsters were academically advanced and would be bored if sent to a traditional school. The
characteristics also included attributes that may have held children back in school due to their
academic struggles or illnesses. Some of the characteristics of the child may also have been
categorized as conditions of the family due to their overwhelming effect on family synergy.
During the research and analysis of the data, the findings revealed that twelve percent of
the time, characteristics of the children were considered as precipitating circumstances for a
parent to begin on the decision-making pathway to start or stop homeschooling their children.
Circumstances in this study that were defined as characteristics of the child were: the belief that a
child is academically advanced for his or her age and grade level, the belief that the child has a
difficult personality, and the existence of a disability or illness from that the child suffers.
Percentages of the characteristics of the children cited as being circumstances that precipitated
the decision-making process to begin or discontinue homeschooling are depicted in Figure 5.6.

118

Figure 5.6 Percentage of Circumstances Cited as Being Characteristics of a Child.
Child illness or
disability
28%

Child is
advanced
55%

Child is
difficult
17%
The following example depicts the characteristics of a child who because she was
advanced, seemed to be more susceptible to the conditions that existed in the school classroom.
When Alexandra’s mother, Lindy, began working with her daughter teaching her the alphabet,
reading to her, and working through basic preschool education, she was doing what she thought
was best for her daughter. After all, Lindy was an elementary teacher who believed that children
who began learning as toddlers would do well in school and after all, it was easy and fun to teach
Alexandra. When Alexandra went to school as a kindergartener, Lindy was excited because this
should be the best year of her life. Lindy said,
When she started kindergarten, I had done preschool at home and she had a lot of
fun and she learned a lot. So by the time she got to school I was really excited for
her to experience kindergarten because for me it was the most fun grade ever.
Alexandra was more than ready for kindergarten; she was already learning to sound out words
and was ready to learn. Unfortunately her kindergarten teacher was ready to retire and was not
really excited to deal with a bunch of noisy five-year-olds. Lindy’s recollection of the
experience did not condemn the teacher, rather she said, “It turned out to be kind of a bad
experience for her. The teacher, it was her last year before retiring so she was not really into it. I
don't know. My expectations were probably way too high.” Her husband Ken continued, “Well

119

the teacher, while a nice person, and of course we didn't have a lot of experience with education,
it seemed as though she was kind of ready to not teach.” Lindy agreed and added,
She was kind of just putting in her time and I was really disappointed with that
because I was really looking forward for this for Alexandra. She ended up
knowing almost everything she needed to know for that year. So I kept in the
back of my mind, I could do better. Not that I am so great, but I felt like I know
we could have gotten further ahead with her. We stuck it out. She did that year
of kindergarten.
As they struggled to be positive, Lindy worked to strengthen her resolve to support the
public schools she loved. As first grade approached, Lindy encouraged Alexandra and grew
excited as school began. Regrettably Alexandra found herself in a classroom with several
difficult children who took up much of the teacher’s time. In addition, her teacher was a single
mother with a new baby who was continually ill and the teacher missed a day or two a week.
For Alexandra, a young girl who was ready to learn to read, the ever changing stream of
substitutes resulted in great disappointment. As Lindy described the situation, you could tell it
still was disconcerting that she forced her child to stay in a poor situation. She commented on
the experience,
That following fall she went to first grade. That was just the turning point for us.
It was kind of a disaster; there were just a lot of circumstances. It is not that the
school system was bad. The teacher was a single mom and she had a baby. She
was gone at least once a week. It was always different people. Her baby was
constantly sick. Alexandra was the type of person that she likes consistency. So
for her, having the sub in there, she didn't like that, it was stressful I guess for her
even at that age; she just hated it…She wasn't learning what I thought she could
be learning and it was a struggle to get her to go in the morning. I thought this is
not what I wanted for her. I just kept thinking that I could do better. Not that I
am so great or that I am so proud of myself, I just knew there was a better
solution.
It was at that time during the first semester Alexandra began to feel ill and started whining and
crying when she had to leave for school, it was at that point her parents began searching for
answers and other options. In addition to the child’s characteristic falling in to the category of
120

academically advanced, the characteristics in the findings also included children whose
disabilities or illnesses precipitated the parent’s decision-making process.
Mindy and her husband, Jeremy, both with college degrees, were hopeful for their son
Brian’s future. After all, Jeremy had been a pro football player and Mindy was a starter on her
school’s varsity basketball team. However, as Brian grew it became obvious that something was
very wrong with him. Mindy described the situation:
When it got time for my son to go to school, he had medical problems his entire
life and we were struggling to find out what was wrong. Basically he had a
terrible time functioning in the world. He was in pain much of the time and we
just weren't getting anywhere with the medical community, but we kept trying
with the medical community.
Mindy continued by telling me, “And it came time for him to go to kindergarten and I really
didn't see that we had the option for sending him to school.” This characteristic of the child,
Brian, may also be seen as a family condition because it affected the entire family due to all of
the medical bills and doctor’s appointments.
Also having a defined circumstance falling under characteristic of the child, Debbie’s
son, Grayson, was attending kindergarten at the local public school. When Debbie volunteered
in his classroom, she noticed that Grayson did not seem to know what to do and looked over at
his neighbor’s assignment. Debbie described her concern to me during the interview by saying,
Grayson was in…developmental kindergarten in the local public school and I
started thinking I don't think the school is a great environment for him as a
learner. I thought he would really get lost in the shuffle. I would observe him. I
would be in the classroom helping out and I would see him just kind of getting by,
just looking at his little neighbors and just kind of going along with what they
were doing. I could tell he was not getting it.
Debbie’s husband had mentioned homeschooling to her prior to their oldest child, Sally,
attending school. Sally was in third grade and doing well. Debbie was not in favor of
homeschooling in general and certainly did not want to homeschool her children. However after
121

seeing Grayson in the classroom, she believed that he may have been affected by dyslexia just
like his father. Debbie’s visit to Grayson’s classroom made her question their decision to send
him to school. She continued by telling me, “Things were just moving too quickly (in Grayson’s
classroom). So I thought I don't know if this is going to work.” While characteristics of the
child influence the precipitation of the pathway to begin homeschooling, they also may preempt
thoughts regarding the discontinuance of homeschooling.

5.9 Characteristics of the Children Influences Discontinuance of Homeschooling
When parents began thinking about discontinuing homeschooling their youngster, it was
sometimes due to the characteristics of their child. In several cases, the child’s personality
spurred their parents into thinking about discontinuing teaching their child at home. For
example, when Kelly was homeschooled in seventh and eighth grade she virtually took all day to
do her school work. Her mom told me that not only was Kelly very distractible, she would argue
and make everyone incredibly miserable. As they continued to work together through the
curriculum Janice became increasingly annoyed at her daughter’s antics and inability to gain
enthusiasm for learning. Janice explained, “We felt like there was no way we could have her
home, she was terrible.” After dealing with Kelly’s incessant begging for two years to go to
school like some of her friends and reassurance that she would work hard at school, Janice and
her husband began to investigate the alternatives for the education of their daughter.
Like Kelly and her desire to be with friends at school, some of the other children who
discontinued homeschooling encouraged their parents to let them go to school so they could join
friends. In several instances in the study, the child’s interest in joining friends at school was one
of the factors leading their parents to begin contemplating discontinuing homeschooling their

122

children. Along with the child’s desire to be with friends, some of the parents mentioned that as
they began to think about homeschooling, one of the factors they considered was the child’s
spiritual well-being. When Hannah was recounting her experience as she and her husband were
thinking about allowing their son Larry, who was in his junior year of high school, to quit
homeschooling, she mentioned that because Larry had a deep faith, he would be okay in public
school. She said, “He had the desire to go to school. He went to church with a bunch of really
good kids who went to the local public school. He thought he wanted to try the high school
experience before he went to college.”
While Larry had always been a stellar student and had high test scores, his brother Jason
was another story. Jason had been difficult for Hannah to homeschool. Larry arrived early in
the morning ready to do his school work; Jason by contrast, had to practically be dragged out of
bed midday. Hannah talked about her concern with Jason’s characteristic of wanting his mom to
lead him through his lessons by saying that he wanted to be helped with his assignments. As
Hannah continued talking about Jason’s characteristic of wanting to be spoon-fed his lessons and
her concern regarding his future, she said, “I knew that he would probably never need an AP
class. I knew he needed to go to school too because he needed out (of homeschooling).” In
addition to academically being difficult, he did not want to attend school. She explained, “He
just wanted to stay home and do like we were doing it before. He is getting close to college and
we saw the benefit it (going to school) had for Larry being more responsible and hardworking.”
She continued by saying, “We wanted him to have peer pressure, we wanted him to have more
responsibility for his own education, I thought for him. And he really needed to take that on to
step up.”

123

Chrystal’s son had the characteristic of being easily distracted by his siblings during
homeschooling and the emergence of a characteristic of wanting to be independent. She also
talked about how his character promoted his difficulty with the daily change in his
homeschooling schedule. Chrystal recounted her experience thinking about when she allowed
her fifteen-year-old son Isaiah, to stop homeschooling and attend school. She said that he
lobbied his parents by claiming that he found the relaxed structure of homeschooling to be
lacking. She continued telling me about her thought process by saying, “He was coming out of
eighth grade. And we thought you know what, maybe it will help our mother and son
relationship stay healthy.” As I have discussed, characteristics of the child influenced the
precipitation of the pathway to discontinue homeschooling. The circumstances of child
characteristics promoting a parent to begin thinking about discontinuing homeschooling include
the child’s inability to cope with the homeschooling schedule, a child’s disability or illness.

5.10 Chapter Summary
The data for this study took into consideration interviews from fourteen families
representing forty-two children ages eighteen months to twenty-four years of age who had been
homeschooled. The children began homeschooling at ages ranging from eighteen months to
eighth grade. Not considered in the study were four younger children who parents did not
consider as being homeschooled. Three of the children who were not included in the study were
four-year-olds and one was a three-year-old. Regardless of the decision-making process that
families followed, all families began the process with an initial concern or thought that propelled
them to investigate homeschooling as a possible educational choice. After analyzing the data, I
have found that the situation that precipitated a parent’s move toward the decision to begin or

124

end homeschooling their child flows from one or more of the circumstances described in this
chapter that fell into four areas: specific events, conditions of schools and families,
characteristics of parents, and characteristics of the children. The findings indicate that there
were one hundred fifty-three circumstances sited by the fourteen families in the study. The
greatest percentage of circumstances fell into the area defined as characteristics of parents, which
was made up of eight different circumstances. The least number of circumstances fell into the
area that was defined as characteristics of the child, which indicates that the parents’ decision
was more about their experiences and characteristics and less about the characteristics of the
child. This fact could have been impacted by the result that sixty-seven percent of the initial
homeschooling decisions were made for preschoolers or kindergartners.

125

CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

6.1 Introduction
The noticeable swelling of the numbers of homeschoolers over the past thirty years has
encouraged researchers to explore this prolific phenomenon. Contrary to parents in the midtwentieth century who were satisfied with the status quo of traditional public or private
schooling, the families of homeschoolers have exerted their collective political pressure, clarified
state laws dealing with compulsory schooling, and have chosen to educate their children at home.
If the fast paced growth has continued since the 2007 NHES survey, homeschooled students
outnumber students enrolled in charter schools and in the fall of 2009 they would have finally
succeeded in topping 1,500,000 (Center for Educational Reform, 2009). Homeschooling
proponents believe that number to be much higher due to hesitancy on the part of parents to
answer the survey. They believe the number of children (grades k through twelve) who are
homeschooled in the United States to be at least two and a half million (Ray, 2009). The
estimate from one expert on homeschooling is that the true number of homeschooled students’ is
twice the national survey results, somewhere between three and five million children (TFL,
2009).
As the number of homeschooling families increase, it is essential for educators to
discover the foundational aspects of the decision-making pathways and the circumstances that
precipitate a family’s decision to begin or discontinue homeschooling. This is critical
information because the very essence of our country is built on the education that is available to
our children. Simply ignoring an educational innovation or anomaly such as homeschooling will
not ensure the proliferation of our country’s learning foundation and cultural heritage. The

126

findings contained in this study will help to enlighten educators and parents who are interested in
learning more about the process that leads to homeschooling. The results of this research demand
our attention and provide an impetus for educators, parents, policy-makers and homeschooling
organizations to begin to think differently. Having scrutinized in detail the specific mechanisms
of the decision-making processes represented by the six possible pathways and the precipitating
circumstances, we are now in a position to evaluate the relevancy of the groundwork described in
the first chapter and develop a revised viewpoint.
Prior to the gathering and analysis of data in this study, we already were in possession of
solid information on the reasons parents choose to homeschool. What was not understood was
how parents make critically important decisions either to start or stop homeschooling their
children. I believed that this type of decision would be a potentially life-changing moment in the
life of a child and his or her family. The evidence reveals that the move both to and from
homeschooling has the ability to change the lives of a family forever. The research scrutinized
the question as to whether the parental decision-making process accounted for a full
understanding of the potential implications and consequences of a choice to homeschool their
children. I postulated that the disregard of potential implications and consequences during the
decision-making process to start or stop homeschooling could be harmful to a child’s education
and development. Considering the fact that a growing population of parents have opted for
homeschooling, I was concerned about our foundational understanding of whether families are
merely jumping on board with a current trend or thoughtfully weighing their options and
collecting information before taking the leap. I commented that if it is the former, then there
may be cause for concern regarding the long-term consequences of an ill-informed trend. If it is
the latter, then educators within traditional school settings may need to rethink whether and how

127

they are meeting the needs of individual children. The results of the research show that following
a precipitating circumstance a family does indeed follow a decision-making pathway. The
families in the study were very intentional regarding their opportunity of collecting information
from various sources and weighing their options as they moved through the decision-making
process prior to making the final choice. It was obvious as I moved through the data analysis
that the parents did not simply jump into homeschooling and make a snap decision. Rather, the
pathway was thoughtful and often involved a change in the parent’s perspective as they gave
credence to the stories they read and heard regarding homeschooling. For all of these reasons,
the research into the decision-making processes around homeschooling helps strengthen the
knowledge base by which homeschooling is either enhanced so as to be more effective or the
decision-making process leads to the reduction of effort so as to minimize the burden on an ever
growing number of families as they contemplate the best educational environment for their child.
Furthermore, learning about the decision-making process and the depth of understanding that
most families gain as they proceed through that process leading towards a choice to begin or
discontinue homeschooling, helps to answer questions regarding the growing population of
homeschooling families.
Due to the convenience and snowball sampling methods used in this research the
findings of this study are not fundamentally generalizable to all families who homeschool their
children. However, these findings are still informative because they provide a base knowledge to
compare future research and help give insight into a formerly hidden process through which
families move as they choose to begin or discontinue homeschooling. The findings of this
research will serve to illuminate an area of family performance that had previously not been
viewed, contemplated, dissected, and analyzed by researchers. The use of the six decision-

128

making processes gives structure to a formerly cloudy area of human behavior and gives
information into the intentionality by which the families think about information they receive,
how they weigh this information, and how emotions and culture impact their pathway to their
final choice of learning environments for their children.
The research included fourteen families, consisting of forty-two children ages eighteen
months to twenty-four years, who were intentionally homeschooled and two children who their
parents did not homeschool because they were four-years-old. Of the twenty contacts I made
with potential interviewees, I was able to schedule fourteen recorded interviews, which were
then transcribed, coded and analyzed. Some of the parents who were unavailable for an
interview operated on a tight time schedule due to homeschooling, work or volunteer
commitments. Many of the families were interested in telling their story, so the interviews were
fluid and cordial. Even those families who had discontinued homeschooling their children due to
age or other causes, were able to provide information regarding the circumstances that
precipitated their initial move to investigate homeschooling and the decision-making pathway
that the families followed through to their final choice to begin or end homeschooling. The
critical nature of the decision-making process indelibly inked the information into the memories
of the interviewees.
This final chapter summarizes the research findings regarding the circumstances
precipitating the initial thought about homeschooling and the parental decision-making processes
pertaining to the choice to begin or discontinue homeschooling. As a result of this study we
should be thinking differently about the way parents surf through the streams of the decisionmaking process. This chapter discusses how this study adds to the prior literature, examines the
implications for educators, and identifies directions for future research. The central research

129

questions guided this study, from the initiation of the research through to the data collection and
analysis.
This research was designed to answer two overarching questions:


What process do parents go through when making the decision to begin or discontinue
homeschooling their children?



What are the circumstances that precipitate a parent’s decision to move their children to
homeschool or to end homeschooling?

The research questions were answered successfully and discussed in great detail in chapters four
and five. Specific conclusions are described and discussed in the following sections.

6.2 Parental Decision-Making Process
The results of the study reveal that for parents going through the decision-making process
and choosing whether to begin or discontinue homeschooling their child, the outcome and many
times the pathway to the decision is life changing. The findings have indicated that the course of
the decision-making process is critical as parents contemplate a move to homeschooling or
consider discontinuing teaching their children at home. As I began conceptualizing the decisionmaking theory that would be applicable to parents who either followed a process to choose to
begin or discontinue homeschooling, I found that decision-making regarding homeschooling had
primarily been addressed in two key contributions to the literature. First, while comparing
burnout in homeschooling mothers to schoolteacher burnout, Lois (2006) examined the timing of
the decision to homeschool. Lois found that some parents make the decision to homeschool
prior to having children, other parents reviewed options for their children approaching school
age, and still other parents decided to begin homeschooling while their children were attending

130

public or private schools. However, she did not discuss the way in that they made the decision or
the decision-making process they followed. In a second study, Hall (2007) conducted research in
DeKalb County, Georgia on factors that influence parents’ decision-making process. She found
that “the goal of homeschooling was to provide a successful education for children by applying a
warm and loving environment, which fostered closeness and parental participation.” While part
of her research focuses on and discusses decision-making, it ignores the process through that
parents traverse when deciding to begin or discontinue homeschooling.
As a guide for my research into the decision-making process that families move through
when choosing to begin or discontinue homeschooling and the focus of the precipitating events
to the decision-making process I used two basic models of decision-making. The initial model
by Paton (2007) featured three main time periods in the decision-making process: before the
decision, the decision, and after the decision. In my study, I worked to intertwine Paton’s before
the decision time-period with six multifaceted, complex, unique choice processes that include
various rational factors, logical steps, and pressures as presented by Langley (et al.,1995, Davis,
1973; Lipham, 1981; Dunstan, 1981; Rankin, 1981; Lipham & Rankin, 1982). The six decisionmaking model pathways presented by Langley (et al., 1995) included steps during which
evidence was gathered and interpreted through a lens made up of personal perceptions,
assumptions, and experiences. The six pathways (as shown in Figure 2.1) were be labeled as
sequential, anarchical, iterative sequence, convergent, insightful, and linkages (Payne, 2003;
Lipham, 1982; Langley et al., 1995).
I began by using Langley’s (et al., 1995) six decision-making pathways to analyze the
decision-making pathways within the fourteen families in the study. During the analysis phase
of the research, I found that the families in the study followed one of four decision-making

131

processes when they began to homeschool their initial child. They followed the decision-making
pathways entitled sequential, convergence, insightful, or iterative sequence. All of the families
in the study chose to homeschool more than one child and many of them used a different
decision-making pathway when choosing to homeschool the subsequent children.
The two predominate decision-making processes when a family chose to begin
homeschooling were convergence and insightful. They accounted for seventy-nine percent of
the families’ decision-making pathways. During the analysis it became clear that in the two key
decision-making models, the schooling choice for the initial child was a critical and complex
process filled with thoughtful research, conversations with homeschooling friends, and
contemplation regarding faith implications. During the study it became evident that when the
parents initiated the decision-making process and followed it through the twists and turns,
researching and spending time talking to each other and with their friends they made a lifechanging realization. For both the convergence and insightful decision-making process, this first
choice was not a simple assessment of the pros and cons of homeschooling but rather a pathway
where each family had to overcome feelings of self-doubt and uneasiness, along with in some
cases a fundamental aversion to of the idea of homeschooling.
During the course of the analysis, it was determined that for the initial child, few families
ventured through the decision-making process of sequential (fourteen percent) or iterative
sequence (seven percent) and none of the families used the processes that were classified as
anarchical or linkages. Interestingly, during the analysis of the decision-making process for the
subsequent children the resulting percentages were substantially different. Due to the contrast of
the parents’ view of the critical nature of the initial process versus the more logical decisionmaking methodology for the subsequent children, it was evident through the analysis that a

132

greater percentage of the parents moved in a more step-by-step, straightforward vein for their
subsequent children. The data analysis found that the all of the families who homeschooled their
children were concerned with the academic development of their child and that they reconsidered
homeschooling their child on a yearly basis. Many of the families found that since
homeschooling worked for their initial child they followed a more simplified logical process to
choose to homeschool their subsequent children. For the subsequent children, the majority of the
families in the study followed the straight-forward, logical pathway of sequential decisionmaking. Through this process families honed in on their final selection of homeschooling
through a thoughtful pathway that followed a finely planned conduit made up of stages of
research plateaus, defined moments assessing alternatives, and educational options and
movement towards the final implementation of their choice (Langley et al., 1995).
Prior to this ground breaking study on the decision-making process followed by parents
to begin or discontinue homeschooling, there had been a couple of studies that touched on
reasons parents decide to begin homeschooling, but I was unable to detect any studies that
considered the decision-making process families follow when discontinuing homeschooling.
The outcomes of the study found that this simple question of the decision-making process
families follow when discontinuing homeschooling captures an interesting aspect of the
relationship between parents and children during their homeschooling years. During the analysis
phase I found that twenty-one out of the forty-two children in the study discontinued
homeschooling and moved or returned to a school setting after being homeschooled. I
discovered that the occasions that led to discontinuing homeschooling revealed evidence that
during the decision-making process steps were followed and critical research was completed
prior to the final choice. In eighty-one percent of the time, families followed the sequential

133

decision-making process when they discontinued homeschooling their child. In fourteen percent
of the decisions to discontinue homeschooling, families followed the convergence decisionmaking pathway and in five percent of the time parents followed the anarchical process. It was
evident that the initial decision to begin homeschooling carried a greater impact on the families’
philosophy and practical habits, than did any other decision unearthed during the research. Since
many of the mothers had never even contemplated homeschooling their child, they first had to
have precipitating circumstances arise and acknowledge the weight of those circumstances prior
to entering into the decision-making pathway. This situational aspect of the process resulted in
the critical nature of the initial decision-making pathway to begin homeschooling.

6.3 Circumstances Precipitating the Decision-Making Process
Providing a virtual corridor into the decision-making process, the descriptive analysis of
the data from fourteen families allowed us to see the pathway through their eyes and move with
the parents along the frequently emotional and occasionally straight-forward decision-making
process from the circumstances that precipitated the process to the ultimate choice. The
homeschooling parents interviewed in this study revealed that the precipitating circumstances
that initialized their decision-making pathways included specific events, conditions of schools
and families, characteristics of parents, and characteristics of children. Through an exhaustive
look at the data, the findings exhibit the results that reveal that while a precipitating circumstance
may stand on its own, the resulting parental decision-making pathway was a consequence of the
impact of multiple precipitating circumstances.
The findings of this study regarding the circumstances that precipitate the decisionmaking process show that the results in some instances correlate to previous studies. By

134

beginning with the existing studies, most notably the nationwide National Home Education
Survey (IESa,2007), I have discovered how a number of comparisons connect my findings to this
large study. My findings compare to the top three reasons for homeschooling children as found
by the families surveyed by the National Home Education Survey (NHES) that were:
dissatisfaction with the school environment, dissatisfaction with academic instruction at other
schools, and a desire to provide religious instruction (IESa, 2007). The findings in my study
indicate the top two reasons for families to begin looking into homeschooling to be academic
concern and faith. Like the national survey, families in my study did have concerns about the
school environment, including fifty-seven percent who had a negative interaction with a school
and twenty-nine percent who were concerned with school safety. When analyzing the
precipitating factors regarding the circumstances that may initialize a parent to embark on a
decision-making pathway leading to homeschool their child, ninety-three percent of the parents
voiced a concern regarding faith and their child’s educational environment during their
interviews. When I take into account the totality of the interviews, one-hundred percent of the
parents mentioned faith during their interview. Due to the nature of the convenience and
snowball sample, the results I obtained indicated that one-hundred percent of the families were
Christian. My lifelong affiliation with the mid-Michigan Christian community focused my
convenience sample and the subsequent snowball sample in the Christian community. This
result is also higher than the results determined by the Homeschool Legal Defense Association
(HSLDA) that found that over seventy percent of homeschoolers are Christian (2012).
When reviewing the circumstances that precipitated a parent to initiate the decisionmaking process, I began looking at elements that correlated across families. Commonalities
between families in the study were found by defining the precipitating circumstances into

135

subgroups entitled: specific events, conditions of schools and families, characteristics of parents,
and characteristics of children. Each subgroup was subsequently defined based upon responses
given by parents through the interview process. The largest subgroup was entitled characteristics
of parents. Circumstances that fell into the parental characteristics subgroup made up fifty-two
percent of the total number of identified circumstances and included parental concerns for
academics and school safety, spousal encouragement occasionally due to the father’s past
schooling experiences and positive characteristics defined as parental confidence regarding
homeschooling and their friendship with homeschoolers. The dominate category in this
subgroup was parental concern for academics with one hundred percent of the families declaring
that they were interested in their child’s academic learning environment. The strong showing of
academics in the results of my study was in part due to the fact that I was able to ask questions in
different ways to discover the passion that the parents in my research population had for
academics. The results also may be attributed to the fact that all of the parents had a minimum of
an associate’s degree. I found that fifty-seven percent of the families talked about a negative
school experience they had with their local educational institution and I was able to decipher that
parents had a specific concern with their child’s academics seventy-one percent of the time.
While the families did not all express dissatisfaction with the academic instruction in the
traditional schools in their area, the fact that all of the parents were concerned in one way or
another with their child’s education shows a stronger result than did the results from the NHES
where seventeen percent of parents indicated that the most important reason they homeschool is
their dissatisfaction with “academic instruction” (IESd, 2007).
Data gathered in a study by Olsen (2008), revealed that a parent’s perception of their own
experience guides their expectations for their child’s experience. He comments, “For some

136

parents, the decision to initiate a home school program was primarily motivated by their own
negative experiences in school (Olsen, p 180, 2008).” In fifty-seven percent of the fourteen
families in the study, I found that a precipitating circumstance for a family to begin
contemplating homeschooling was that the father had difficulties in school. None of the mothers
indicated that they had any difficulties in school, in fact in a couple instances; the mothers
indicated without prompting that their school experience was positive.
While my study on parental decision-making did not specifically ask for a primary
motivation, it is obvious that there is correlation between the data sets. The national study cited
the statistic of twenty-one percent of who parents answered the NHES gave safety, drugs or
negative peer pressure as a reason to homeschool their children (IESd, 2007). In my study
twenty-nine percent of the parents voiced concern regarding school safety. Only fourteen
percent of the parents in my study actually mentioned drugs being in schools and seven percent
of the parents were quite concerned regarding the presence of drugs in public schools. This
difference in results may be attributed to the fact that I was able to sit down with the parents
either in their homes, a restaurant or my office and listen and use follow-up queries for between
forty-five minutes and an hour and a half as they described their concerns, dreams, issues,
beliefs, and experiences that led to choosing to homeschool.
When reviewing the data set for the subgroup of the precipitating circumstances entitled
conditions of schools and families, three commonalities stood out. The conditions that were the
most common across families included: a faith concern that was defined in regard to the school’s
lack of a religious component, the families’ belief that God was encouraging them to
homeschool and the fact that the family was praying for God’s guidance. The conditions also
included a disability or illness that affected the family or the fact that the mother was in the home

137

taking care of the children. Various homeschooling researchers have delved in to the question of
faith and have determined that homeschoolers are traditionally and predominately fundamentalist
Christians who cite religious motivations for homeschooling (Bolick, 1987; Mayberry, 1987;
Nemer, 2002, Van Galen, 1988, Welner & Welner, 1999, Lines 2000). Klicka (2006) found that
many homeschool families intend for their children to learn specific beliefs, values, and skills
and view teaching their children at home to be a directive from God, which represents their
obedience and reliance on Biblical foundational ideology. This finding corresponds with the
number one concern found in the National Household Education Survey (2007) that determined
that thirty-six percent of respondents viewed providing moral or religious instruction as being the
dominate reason for homeschooling their children (IESa, 2007). In my study I found that forty
percent of the precipitating circumstances in the conditions of families and schools subgroup fell
into the faith concerns category. In total ninety-three percent of the families cited at least one of
the contributing factors leading them to be categorized as having concerns linked to their faith.
The subgroup defined as specific events accounted for fourteen percent of the
circumstances that were revealed through the interview process. The parents who were
interviewed spoke about being influenced by the following precipitating specific events: their
child requested permission to begin or discontinue homeschooling; it also included parents who
had a negative school experience and parents who focused on researching homeschooling. The
findings reviewed the information from the interviews of fourteen families. Each of these
families voiced a concern regarding their child’s education. They wanted to insure that their
child was treated and educated the way they would want him or her to be. During the interview
with Lindy and Ken as they were talking about their daughter Alexandra, although at the time
she was junior in college, they still expressed passion for her education and the placement that

138

benefited her the most. This element of academic concern was a prevalent thread throughout all
of the interviews.
In the subgroup entitled characteristics of a child, the commonalities included three
categories: the fact that the parents believe that their child was advanced compared to peers, the
child was difficult to homeschool due to personality traits and habits, and the fact that child had
an illness or disability that included attention deficit disorder. Parents who had a child with a
learning disability or illness that was not adequately addressed by the school or which the parents
believed was not adequately addressed by the school began to investigate teaching their children
at home. Some of the cases discussed in this study may have been preempted if additional care
had been exerted by the school’s administration. For example, regarding the specific event when
Janice happened to substitute in her daughter’s sixth grade classroom, and found that the
discipline was less than optimal, it may have been the result of a need for training for the teacher
or the substitute, or due to inadequate follow through by the administration in the form of student
discipline or teacher evaluation. Janice’s heighten concern was exacerbated by the fact that
Kelly had been recently diagnosed with ADD. Olsen (2008) found in his study that special
needs played a part in motivating parents to begin homeschooling their child. This result agrees
with the NHES research that found six percent of the parents reported homeschooling due to
health problem or special needs (IESa, 2007). In my study thirty-six percent of the parents
indicated that the child’s illness or disability prompted the parents to begin to embark on a
decision-making process to investigate homeschooling. The higher level of response in my study
may be an indication of the way in that I collected my responses. During my interview process I
gathered data that showed responses regarding the precipitating circumstances in more than one

139

category, where the NHES study indicated the one reason parents’ homeschooled. I discovered
that precipitating circumstances did not stand alone, but were predominately found in groups.
Discontinuing homeschooling began with a precipitating circumstance that initiated the
thought to change a child’s learning environment from the home to a school. With precipitating
circumstances ranging from students who wanted to discontinue homeschooling to take college
courses to the impact of a terminally ill husband on a homeschooling environment, again, there
was more than one circumstance that precipitated discontinuing homeschooling. In one hundred
percent of the families in the study, the parents’ concern regarding the academic situation of their
child’s learning environment was prevalent, along with a decision by the families to reconsider
homeschooling on a yearly basis. Prevalent circumstances that were identified by the parents as
having an impact on their embarking on a decision-making pathway to decide whether to
discontinue homeschooling also included the fact that an initial child ended homeschooling so
the parents felt the next child would be okay. It also considered a concern by parents regarding
finances. The financial concerns were influenced by the fact that a student could earn college
credit through the advanced placement program, the fact that it is less expensive to send a child
to school and for two families that their child’s participation in college courses was equal or less
expensive than their participation in the local homeschool educational co-operative program. By
participating in either the advanced placement program through a local public high school or
through the local community college the students could earn college credit and save their parents
money over having the children take the credits later at a four-year college or university.
Fourteen percent of the families had children who opted to take college classes during their
senior year of homeschooling rather than homeschooling full time. Financial concerns included
the fact that if it was necessary for the parent to hire a tutor for their child they could register

140

their child for a public school or online charter and receive free schooling. In Tina’s case her
inability to feel confident when teaching her children English and writing influenced her to
choose a public school for her three sons in high school rather than hiring a tutor. She also
considered the impact of advanced placement courses on her final college tuition bill for her
children. After moving through the decision-making pathway for her daughter, she believed that
financial concerns were outweighed by her concerns regarding faith, so she registered Grace at a
Christian school where she would benefit from both a supported environment for her faith and
receive advanced placement courses while in high school.
To a lesser extent a precipitating event was the child’s request to attend school whether a
college or high school. Positive responses were made in three families. Four families accounted
for six children who had requested moving to a school; three to a high school and three to take
college classes. The parents did not always greet requests to attend school with a positive
answer. In two cases that were revealed during the interview, requests to attend school were met
with a negative response after the parent proceeded through the decision-making process. There
were more casual requests that lasted for a day or so, but due to the child’s changing request, the
families did not pursue the decision-making pathway.

6.4 Implications
As the population and diversity of homeschooling continues to grow and impact
education, it is important that policy-makers and school leaders increase their understanding of
how families make the critical decisions to start or stop homeschooling. The implications of this
research on homeschooling will bring a deeper appraisal of the process of making-decisions and
circumstances that precipitate a family’s choice to homeschool. This research provides policy-

141

makers and school leaders with a more balanced assessment of homeschooling by
conceptualizing the inside story regarding a family’s pathway leading to choose to homeschool
their children. This research captures the voice of fourteen families who made a critical decision
to homeschool their children and it illuminates the circumstances that precipitate the decisionmaking process for policy-makers and school leaders. The policy-makers and school leaders
must become generally more informed about the true nature of homeschooling because theorists
believe that homeschoolers seek to influence politics and American culture (Kunzman, 2009).
Regarding the reasons educated professional parents choose homeschooling for their children
over furthering their careers, school leaders must assimilate the thought process and begin to
design programs and policies that will forge a link between established school communities and
current and potential homeschoolers.
In this study the results show that two students took classes while being homeschooled
from their local high school. In both cases the students took band. When thinking about
ramifications regarding administrators and administrative policy in a traditional school setting, it
is important to take note of the great academic concerns for homeschoolers. As school
administrators work to structure programs that may include homeschooled students, they will
want to focus on academic quality. It was obvious from the earlier research by the IES (2007)
that sixteen percent of children who homeschool participate in classes in a local school. In
addition, school administrators must continue to work with other school personnel to increase
safety and the reassurance of parents that there exists a safe school environment. The study’s
data revealed that twenty-nine percent of the parents were concerned about school safety. As
Karis commented when talking about school safety, “You never know what could happen in a
little school.” School leaders will want to pay close attention and reassure victims of violent act.

142

The parents of both victims and their classmates may be so influenced and concerned by the
event that they may begin looking into removing their children from the school.
This controversial topic of homeschooling has been discussed with all diligence and
deference and sheds a light on the circumstances that have been shown to precipitate a thought
regarding homeschooling. Parents considering homeschooling will benefit greatly by this
study’s addition to the body of knowledge regarding the critical reasons parents choose to
homeschool their children. In addition, for the parents who are currently homeschooling their
children, it is essential to determine the precipitating circumstances that could cause them to
begin a decision-making pathway that could end with a choice to discontinue homeschooling.
Along with the attention parents will give to the results of this study regarding the precipitating
circumstances, they will benefit from the descriptions and analyses of the decision-making
process. As parents begin to contemplate homeschooling, they will be interested in the cited
comments contained in this dissertation. Many of the parents who were interviewed for this
study found themselves doubting their ability to teach their children. It will be of interest to
potential homeschoolers and service providers to digest the data regarding the transformation
from a parent who had little confidence in their ability and were concerned as Jessica commented
that she would “screw up” her children. Additionally, potential parents and service providers
may encounter the concern of many of the interviewees regarding their concern about their belief
that homeschooling children are weird. When finding their way from the concern that
homeschooling children are weird, to their determination that homeschooled children are polite,
socially adept, and able to talk with other children as well as adults with poise and confidence.
The positional swing of their opinions will help to inform potential homeschoolers of their
child’s potential. Mindy confirmed her belief in the positive social aspects of homeschooling

143

when she revealed that her son has been involved in basketball, karate, racing, and the Young
Republicans’ Club. She went on to talk about the fact that her daughter, who has Attention
Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and aspergers, wheeled her electric wheel chair to assist
a five year old who was having difficulty during an archery lesson. She went on to explain that
this was not an anomaly; it is more the rule that older homeschooling children assist the younger
ones during cross-age activities.

6.5 Future Research
For researchers engaged in examining educational practices, it is important to learn more
about homeschooling and the interrelationships between decision-making and the pathways to
the future of education for our children. This study was an endeavor to develop an
understanding of the circumstances that precipitate a parent’s initial thought to begin or end
homeschooling and the subsequent decision-making process that follows. As the number of
parents who choose to homeschool their children increases and the ranks continue to swell, it
becomes more important to research and explore this prolific phenomenon. It is recommended
that future research studies be completed in the ensuing areas.
To assist school administrators future research should evaluate the following research
opportunities: further investigate precipitating circumstances and decision-making pathways
regarding their choice to discontinue homeschooling; expand the research into the effects and
impact of homeschooling on traditional schools – focusing on the financial aspects of externality
costs; investigate school district sponsored proactive cooperative programs that connect to
homeschoolers.

144

By completing further investigation of the precipitating circumstances and decisionmaking pathways, while looking specifically at determining the percentage of homeschoolers
who discontinue homeschooling and why they choose to leave homeschooling, may give school
administrators an opportunity to better market their schools to potential homeschoolers, by
highlighting the problematic areas for homeschoolers. This research would add important
information to the foundational base laid by my study and would provide information for
homeschooling families and companies who market to homeschoolers. With updated and a
greater breadth of information regarding precipitating circumstances that lead to a decision to
discontinue schooling, parents who homeschool could work to avoid those circumstances
through strategic planning exercises with their families. Companies who market curriculum,
basic information and seminars to homeschoolers may take into account the cutting edge
information regarding these problematic precipitating circumstances and work to strategize to
provide parents and families with information to counteract various situations that may lead to
families discontinuing homeschooling their children.
To assist families who may be interested in researching the decision-making process,
further research into the opportunity costs for parents and students will help to inform the
knowledge base. In regards to parents, the research into opportunity costs may be focused on the
economic concerns in relation to employment for only one parent rather than two parents in
order to homeschool their children. When focusing on students, the research into opportunity
costs may focus on whether the children have given up possible instruction in curricular areas
which could lead to a restriction of career choices due to homeschooling. Opportunity costs to
students may also include the lack of laboratory facilities for chemistry, physics, and biology.
Additionally, opportunity cost for students may include the lack of enhanced technology.

145

Future researchers may be interested in reviewing the intricacies and reasons why there
are more mothers who homeschool their children than fathers. The study could focus on power
relationships within the family unit related to decision-making. The researchers may also want
to delve into the consideration as to whether the decision to homeschool is truly a joint decision
or if the husband in a patriarchal relationship has a dominant amount of power in the decisionmaking process when choosing to homeschool. The study could also determine whether
homeschooling is an avenue through which mothers may remain home with their children rather
than joining the work-force, or by which husbands might influence that decision.
To assist school administrators, the expansion of research into the effects and impact of
homeschooling on traditional schools may illuminate the reasons why schools across the United
States are experiencing financial difficulties. When focusing on the financial aspects of
externality, where the researcher would pay specific attention to the ramifications to the local
educational agency in terms of bond issue and millage passage rates in comparison to the
homeschooling population as a percentage of the local population of children, the researcher may
find that homeschooling has a negative impact on the schools’ financial viability.
Future research that would investigate school district sponsored proactive cooperative
programs that connect homeschoolers to their local schools by offering programs in music, art,
physical education or athletics, may enlighten school administrators in terms of discovering
whether the programs are beneficial. The research could focus on the return rate of students who
left school for homeschooling as well as for students who never have attended a traditional
school. It would be interesting to determine whether the percentage of incoming full time
students who were previously homeschooled outweighed the percentage in districts that do not
provide support programs or liaisons that connect with homeschoolers. The research could also

146

delve into the costs and benefits ratio based upon the passage rates of bond issues and millage
passage in comparison with the programs that are offered to homeschoolers.
Future research could be called upon to investigate the existence and effects of peer
pressure in churches where many parents currently homeschool on the choice parents make when
moving along a decision-making pathway. In addition, research may determine the effects on
the degree that a church is supportive of homeschooling by providing space for programs and the
percentage of eligible parents in a congregation who choose to homeschool.
Conceptualizing decision-making theory regarding how a family’s ethnicity, culture, and
heritage affect the choice to homeschool may enlighten both companies who market to
homeschoolers and local school administrators. This opportunity for future research focusing on
the role of ethnicity, culture, and heritage could lead to an opportunity for school administrators
to use strategic planning techniques to thwart the decision-making process for certain
populations, thereby retaining them in their school systems. Companies who market to
homeschoolers may also benefit by this particular research study because they could begin to do
early marketing to those who are more likely to certain types of stimulus in regards to their
decision-making pathways.

6.6 Conclusion
A big take-a-way in this research illuminates the fact that the outcomes were not
predictable. The research may have predicted that the six decision-making pathways would have
been of an equal distribution, with two to three families falling into each process. In this case to
capture the relationship between the research interviews and the resulting pathways, I have
strived to draw correlations and found that two pathways were dominant. The most dominate of

147

the pathways, convergence, allowed parents who had an inkling of homeschooling to unfold and
narrow their thoughts and considerations to a final selection. The secondary pathway, insightful,
represents families whose big a-ha moments provided a striking realization as parents moved
towards their ultimate choice. This foundational aspect of my research, analyzing the pathways
through a revolutionary ideology gives us an opportunity to add to the body of knowledge
regarding the parent’s decision-making process.
As a result of this study we should be thinking differently regarding the ways parents
make a decision to begin or end homeschooling. Having conceptualized the decision-making
process and the circumstances that have precipitated the parents leap into the pathway moving
towards homeschooling, I have found that different decision-making pathways have been
generated to a great extent based upon a deep concern for academic opportunities, the impact of
friends and associates who homeschool their children, and a genuine concern regarding faith
decisions and foundational beliefs. These basic triggers for the parent’s move to homeschooling
become a foundational aspect of their homeschooling lifestyle. As Katrina explained in her
interview, “We are choosing a lifestyle.” She continued to discuss her feelings that while it is a
lifestyle that comes with its positive relaxed schedule and ability to integrate teachable moments
into the curriculum, Katrina commented in regards to homeschooling, “It’s not who they are, it’s
the mode we have chosen for education.” Bathed in opportunities to act on her expressed
concern regarding academics, Mindy’s comment further illuminated her love for her children and
interest in their ability to maintain proper health, when she commented on her positive feelings
about the flexible schooling schedule provided by learning in the home. Mindy explained her
feelings by saying, “He feels he learns well the way we are doing it, he does well, and he has
gotten healthier.” She continued by telling me, “I think over time you figure it out that's not how

148

our homeschool has to look like. It can be flexible and if the kids need to sleep in, they need to
sleep in today, that's their bodies telling them that they need more rest.” This realization that the
homeschooling lifestyle as exhibited by the fourteen families in my study may be more
beneficial to a child’s educational progress than attendance at a traditional school runs contrary
to the belief of the majority of educational theorists, but is groundbreaking for future families
who will become interested in homeschooling.
A huge concern regarding homeschooling for educational practitioners is socialization.
As I would explain the foundational aspects of my research to non-homeschoolers, many people
would comment on their great concern for socialization of homeschoolers and how
homeschooling would affect the rest of their lives due to lack of socialization. Similarly a large
concern for the families in my study was socialization of their children. As the parents followed
the decision-making process to their final choice, many indicated that they did not want to have
their children turn out to be weird. Through the analysis of the interviews I found that while
parents were initially concerned with socialization, their intense investigation into the various
aspects of homeschooling and their decision to provide intentional socialization opportunities for
their children, they were able to squelch their concerns. This research, incorporating stories about
real families who traversed through a thoughtful decision-making process, will help lay the
groundwork for parents who have experienced a precipitating circumstance to comfort them
regarding concerns about socialization.
Having examined in detail the specific triggers in the form of precipitating
circumstances that occur as points of influence for parents to begin the decision-making process,
I have found with true cogency that the fact that children have had a negative school experience
was a precipitating factor. As seen in the explanation earlier in chapter five, I found a link

149

between the father who has had a negative school experience and his propensity to propose and
encourage his wife with the idea of homeschooling. This fact is an important milestone in
homeschooling research.
The outcome of the research shows a major challenge for local school administrators in
the form of cooperating and supporting children with illness or disabilities. This simple fact
alone provided precipitating circumstances that call into question the agility and willingness to
adapt to the needs of students and to provide them with supports during a lengthy illness. In the
case of Janice and her daughter Kelly, we saw the fact that her attention deficit disorder limited
her ability to attend to the learning environment and her condition was exasperated by the lack of
discipline and order in the classroom. According to my research interview with Connie as she
replayed her differences and difficulties with her local school during the poisoning of her son,
Fred, and her daughter Marilyn’s illness, this scenario certainly calls into question that the
administrators could have acted in a more supportive way to assist Connie as she worked to
educate her children.
As the population and diversity of homeschooling continues to grow and impact
education, it is important that researchers and policy-makers evaluate and increase their
understanding of how families make the critical decisions to start or stop homeschooling. For
researchers engaged in examining educational practices it is important to learn more about
homeschooling and the interrelationships between decision-making and the pathways to the
future of education for our children.

150

APPENDICES

151

Appendix A: Homeschool Interview Request Letter

Dear _________________,
My name is Pam Campbell. I am very interested in learning more about homeschooling. Many
of my friends currently homeschool their children and have shared with me why they
homeschool their children, how they choose their curriculum, and their child’s school
experiences.
I am currently working on my PhD at Michigan State University and am doing a qualitative
interview based study about the decision-making process parents go through when choosing to
homeschool their children.
I have always been interested in educational experiences for children. I have worked in the field
of pre-K – 12 education for the past 25 years, both in public and Christian schools. In addition to
my experience in traditional education, I have worked in the area of experiential education in
cooperation with the Salvation Army and the YMCA.
Please be assured that your identity and any answers to the interview questions will be kept
anonymous and confidential.
If you have any questions or concerns, please email me at campb129@msu.edu or call me at
517-290-5747.
Sincerely,

Pam Campbell

152

Appendix B: Interview Consent Form
HOMESCHOOLING STUDY
PAMELA CAMPBELL, MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION
HOMESCHOOLING PARENT INTERVIEW CONSENT FORM
Please read the interview consent form prior to participating in the study.
Research focus:
The focus of my dissertation research is to explore the process that families go through when
deciding to begin or end homeschooling their children.
Your participation in the research:
Your agreement to participate in the homeschooling research would result in meeting with me
for a one hour interview. The interview would consist of questions designed to elicit responses
that will describe the process you used to decide to begin or end homeschooling your children. I
will not interview your children.
Benefits:
Your participation in the homeschooling research will allow you to share your decision making
process with prospective homeschoolers. As homeschooling becomes more popular, your
experiences will help inform others.
Confidentiality:
Your identity will be protected throughout the research process. Pseudonyms will be used to
protect and disguise you and your family in the summation of this research.
Voluntary participation:
Your participation in the research is completely voluntary. If you wish to withdraw prior to the
end of the study, I will not use any information gained from your interview, unless you give me
permission to use portions of your information. You may choose to discontinue participating in
the interview at anytime, and you may skip any particular questions
Data care and protection:
Interview transcripts will not contain your name. Transcripts of your interview will be stored at
my home in Michigan. Transcripts of your interview will be destroyed three years after the
completion of the research. Your interview will be downloaded and stored on my personal
computer until the completion of the research study. Following the conclusion of the study, all
recordings will be permanently erased.
153

Questions:
If you have questions regarding this research study, please call or email me (Pam Campbell) or
Kristy Cooper, my faculty advisor at Michigan State University Graduate School of Educational
Administration:
Pam Campbell
MSU Doctoral Candidate
4444 Long Lake Road
Reading, MI 49274
517-290-5747
campb129@msu.edu

Kristy S. Cooper, Ed.D
Assistant Professor
K-12 Educational Administration
Michigan State University College of Education
403 Erickson Hall
East Lansing, MI 48824
517-353-5461
kcooper@msu.edu

Questions regarding your rights in this research:
If you have questions or concerns about your role and rights as a research participant, would like
to obtain information or offer input, or would like to register a complaint about this study, you
may contact, anonymously if you wish, the Michigan State University's Human Research
Protection Program at 517-355-2180, Fax 517-432-4503, or e-mail irb@msu.edu or regular mail
at 207 Olds Hall, MSU, East Lansing, MI 48824.
Agreement to participate:
The nature and purpose of this research have been satisfactorily described to me, and I agree to
become a participant. I agree to have an audio recording made of my interview.

Signature: _____________________________________
Name (print): __________________________________

154

Date: ______________________

Appendix C: Homeschool Parental Interview Protocol

Campbell Homeschooling Decision Making Process Study
“Thank you for agreeing to meet with me to discuss your decision to homeschool your children.
Do you mind if I record the interview? By recording the interview, I will make sure I get all of
your comments.”
Homeschooling Participants


I know you homeschool your children, what are their names and ages?



Do you have children who you do not homeschool?



Who does most of the teaching?



How long have you been homeschooling?



Where were you educated? (home/traditional public/private independent/private
Christian/Charter)



If you send your child(ren) to a traditional public, private, or charter school for a
particular program, what is the percentage of time he or she is at the school?

Collecting Homeschool Information


Tell me about the time when you began thinking about homeschooling.



Who were the people you discussed homeschooling with as you began thinking about
homeschooling?



How many discussions would you say you had regarding homeschooling your child(ren)?



What positive supportive comments did you receive from those you consulted with as
you began to think about homeschooling?



What negative comments did you receive from those you consulted with as you began to
think about homeschooling?



What books or pamphlets did you read prior to deciding to homeschool your children?
155



Did you attend a homeschool conference, like INCH, while you were deciding to
homeschool?



Did you visit a homeschool group activity, program, or homeschool prior to deciding to
homeschool your children?



Were your children’s opinions important to you as you were going through the decision
making process?



How did your children let you know whether they liked or disliked the idea to
homeschool?



If they disliked the idea, what did you do or say to help them understand your decision?



What steps did you take to come to the decision to homeschool?



How long did you gather information on homeschooling?



What was your biggest concern about homeschooling?



Why was _____ your biggest concern about homeschooling?



** If a particular philosophy of childrearing emerges during the collection phase of the
interview, I will ask the interviewee to discuss their philosophy and how it impacted their
data collection and ultimately their decision to homeschool.

Making the Decision to Homeschool


When you realized you were leaning towards deciding to homeschool, how did you feel?



How did you express your feelings to those you had consulted with during your fact
gathering process?



How did you communicate your decision to those you had consulted with during your
fact gathering process?



What was the first thing you did when you finally made your decision to homeschool
your children?

156



Did any of your friends or children try to talk you out of homeschooling?



What was your children’s reaction to your decision to homeschool?



How do you think did your children felt?



Did all of your children seem to feel the same about your decision to begin
homeschooling?



Seeing the character of homeschool children as you did your research, did that help make
your decision?

Discontinuing Homeschooling


What prompted you to begin thinking about discontinuing homeschooling?



As you began to think about discontinuing homeschooling your child(ren), what was your
greatest concern?



How many discussions would you say you had regarding discontinuing homeschooling
your child(ren)?



With whom did you discuss discontinuing to homeschool your child(ren)?



Did you consult anyone else?



How do you think did your children felt?



Did all of your children seem to feel the same about your decision to discontinue
homeschooling?



Did any of your friends or children try to talk you out of discontinuing homeschooling?



What alternatives to homeschooling did you investigate?

Thank you!

157

BIBLIOGRAPHY

158

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Adler, P. S., and Kwon, S. (2002). 'Social Capital: Prospects For a New Concept.' Academy of
Management. The Academy of Management Review 27: 17-40.
Aldous, J., Condon, T., Hill, S., Straus, M. & Tallman, J. (Eds.). (1971). Family problem solving,
a symposium and theoretical, methodological, and substantive concerns. Hillsdale, IL:
The Dryden Press Inc.
Allison, G. T. (1971). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Boston: Little,
Brown.
American Association of School Librarians., & Association for Educational Communications
and Technology. (1998). Information power: Building partnerships for learning.
Chicago: American Library Association.
Anderson, K. J., & Minke, K. M. (2007). Parent involvement in education: Toward an
understanding of parents' decision making. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(5),
311-323,328. Retrieved on 12/15/11 from
http://ezproxy.msu.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/204203048?accoun
tid=12598
Anderson, M., Kaufman, J. Simon, T.R., Barrios, L. Paulozzi, G. Ryan, R. Hammond, W.
Modzeleski, Freucht, T & Potter, L. (2001). School-associated violent deaths in the
United States, 1994-1999. Journal of the American Medical Association 286Z(21):26952702. Retrieved on 9/27/09 from
http://ezproxy.msu.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/211397547?accoun
tid=12598
Auerbach, C. & Silverstein, L. (2003). Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and
Analysis. NY: NYU Press.
Austin, T. (2004). Goals 2000. Retrieved on 1/3/12 from
http://www.nd.edu/~rbarger/www7/goals200.html
Babbie, E. (1990). Survey research methods (2nd e.) Belmont: Wadsworth
Barfield, R. (2002). Real-Life Homeschooling: The stories of 21 families who teach their
children at home. NY: Fireside.
Barnard, C.I. (1982). The functions of the executive. Cambridge: Harvard UP. Print.
Barrett, W. B. (1950). The Home Education of a Boy: Being the True Account of a Father’s
Experiment in the Education of his Son at Home. NY: Updegraff Press. Retrieved on
12/30/11 from
159

http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015062960573;page=root;view=image;size=1
00;seq=7
Bauman, K. J. (2002, May 16). Home schooling in the United States: Trends and Characteristics.
Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(26). Retrieved 10/2/09 from
http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n26.html.
Belfield, C. (2004) Modeling School Choice: A Comparison of Public, Private-Independent,
Private-Religious And Home-Schooled Students Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12
(30) Retrieved 9/27/09 from http://epaa.asu.edu/v12n30.html
Bell, T. (April 1983). A Nation at Risk. Retrieved 11/12/09 from
http://www.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/risk.html
Bennett, H. (1972). No More Public School. NY: Random House. Retrieved 10/29/09 from
http://www.motherearthnews.com/Nature-Community/1972-07-01/No-More-PublicSchool.aspx
Bernoulli, D. (1954). Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk. Econometrica:
Journal of the Econometric Society. 22:1 (January 1954) pp.23-36. Retrieved on 1/8/12
from http://www.jstor.org.proxy1.cl.msu.edu/stable/pdfplus/1909829.pdf?acceptTC=true
Bielick, S., Chandler, K., & Broughman, S.P. (2001). Homeschooling in the United States:
1999 (NCES 2001- 033). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National
Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved on 10/3/09 from
http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2001/2001033.pdf
Bielick, S. (2008). 1.5 Million Homeschooled Students in the United States in 2007. Institute of
Educational Sciences: National Center for Educational Statistics. Retrieved on 1/6/12
from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2009030
Bloom, M. (2011). For the First Time Ohio Schools Face Closure for Poor Performance.
StateImpact: npr. Retrieved on 11/19/11 from
http://stateimpact.npr.org/ohio/2011/08/04/for-the-first-time-ohio-public-schools-faceclosure-for-poor-performance/.
Bloomer, M. & Hodkinson, P. (2000). Learning careers: continuity and change in young
people’s dispositions to learning. British Educational Research Journal. 26:5, 583-597.
Retrieved on 1/13/12 from
http://www.education.soton.ac.uk/files/projects/nphe/Working_Paper_6.pdf
Bolick, C. (1987). The home-schooling movement. The Freeman: Ideas on Liberty, 37(3), 84-89.
Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (1995). Leading with soul. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

160

Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (1997). Reframing organizations (2nd e.). San Francisco: JosseyBass.
Boston.gov (2012). First Public School Site. Content provided by The Freedom Trail
Foundation. Retrieved on 1/3/12 from
http://www.cityofboston.gov/freedomtrail/firstpublic.asp
Bowers, B. (2011). Sampling Techniques in Qualitative Research. eHow.com Retrieved on
10/28/11 from http://www.ehow.com/info_8071042_sampling-techniques-qualitativeresearch.html
Brandt, R. ed. (2000). Education in a New Era. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and
Curriculum Development.
Brumbaugh, M. (2010). Interview Techniques in Qualitative Research. eHow.com Retrieved on
10/30/11 from http://www.ehow.com/list_7491383_interview-techniques-qualitativeresearch.html
Bumgarner, M. (2007). A Conversation with John Holt. The Natural Child Project. Retrieved
12/17/2011 from http://www.naturalchild.org/guest/marlene_bumgarner.html
Bush, G. (1991). America 2000: An Education Strategy. Washington, D.C.: US Department of
Education.
Center for Educational Reform. (2009). The Charter Connection. Retrieved 11/12/09 from
http://www.edreform.com/Issues/Charter_Connection/?All_About_Charter_Schools
Clark, B. (1975). The Problems of American Education. NY: New York Times Company.
Clark, V. (July 2010). Homeschooling Guidelines and Statues: Analysis of Public School
Superintendents’ Perceptions in Ocean County, New Jersey. UMI 3412473. Ann Arbor,
MI: ProQuest Retrieved on 1/1/12 from
http://search.proquest.com.proxy1.cl.msu.edu/docview/743814744/fulltextPDF/134010F
33D33E206BF/2?accountid=12598
Cliffs Notes. (2012). The Decision-Making Process. Retrieved 10/6/12 from
http://www.cliffsnotes.com/study_guide/The-DecisionMaking-Process.topicArticleId8944,articleId-8863.html
Cohen, M., March, J. & Olsen, J. A Garbage can Model of Organizational Choice.
Administrative Science Quarterly 17.1 (1972): 1-25.
College Board, The. (2009). Apply to College: Homeschooled students and admissions
Retrieved 10/4/09 from http://www.collegeboard.com/student/apply/theapplication/56.html

161

Colfax, D. & Colfax, M. (1988). Homeschooling for Excellence: How to take charge of your
child’s education – and why you absolutely must. New York: Warner Books
Collom, E. & Mitchell, D. (2005). Home Schooling as a Social Movement: Identifying the
Determinants of Homeschoolers’ Perceptions. Sociological Spectrum 25, 3 (May-June
2005): 273-305 Retrieved 10/30/09 from
http://www.usm.maine.edu/soc/collom/collom&mitchell.pdf
Cremin, L. (1980). American Education: The National Experience 1783-1876. NY: Harper &
Row Publishers.
Creswell, J. (1994). Research Design: Qualitative & Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks:
Sage Publications.
Dake, L. (2009, September 7). Making it Through Tough Economic Times: Working from Home
on eBay. A to Z Home’s Cool Retrieved 10/4/09 from
http://homeschooling.gomilpitas.com/articles/090706.htm
Daresh, J.C. (1978). Facilitative environments in senior high schools that individualized
instruction. Technical Report No. 457. Madison: Wisconsin Research and Development
Center for Individualized Schooling.
Davis, J. H. (1973). "Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision
schemes": Errata. Psychological Review, 80(4), 302-302. Retrieved on 9/27/11 from
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0020065
Dayton Christian Homeschool (2009). Dayton Christian Homeschool…Educating for Eternity.
Retrieved 11/12/09 from http://daytonchristian.com/dch/
Department of Defense. (2002). Department of Defense Education Activity Policy
Memorandum. Arlington, VA. Retrieved on 2/18/12 from
http://www.dodea.edu/foia/iod/pdf/02OD002.pdf
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. NY: D.C. Heath & Co.
Dobson, J. (2000). Complete Marriage and Family Home Reference Guide. Carol Stream, IL:
Tyndale.
Dunstan, J.F. (1981). An ethnography study of the decision-making process and leadership
behavior at the school-wide level in selected secondary schools. No. 572. Madison:
Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Individualized Schooling.
Ed.gov (2001). Elementary and Secondary Education Act: No Child Left Behind. Retrieved on
1/2/12 from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/index.html
Ed.gov (2010). Elementary and Secondary Education Act Reauthorization: A Blueprint for
162

Reform. Retrieved on 1/2/12 from
http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/blueprint/index.html
Education Commission for the States (2009). Homeschooling. Retrieved 10/4/09 from
http://www.ecs.org/ecsmain.asp?page=/html/meetings.asp,
Edweek.org; EPE Research Center. (2004, September 21) Home Schooling. Retrieved 10/4/09
from http://www.edweek.org/rc/issues/home-schooling/#
Education Week (2011). Home Schooling. July 13, 2011. Retrieved on 1/6/12 from
http://www.edweek.org/ew/issues/home-schooling
Exploring Homeschooling. (2009). Are you considering homeschooling? Retrieved 11/12/09
from http://www.exploringhomeschooling.com/
Farenga, P. (2003). Teach Your Own: The John Holt Book of Homeschooling. Jackson, TN:
Perseus
Farris, M. & Woodruff, S. (2000). The Future of Homeschooling. Peabody Journal of Education
75(1,2), 233-255.
Focus on the Family Action Incorporated. (2009). Focus on the Family Policy Statement on
Homeschooling. Retrieved on 11/12/09 from
http://www.citizenlink.org/FOSI/education/A000001399.cfm.
Folger, R. & Skarlicki, D. P. (1999). Unfairness and resistance to change: Hardship as
mistreatment. MCB Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12(1) [On-line].
Available: http://ww.emerald-library.com/brev/02312ac1.htm
Fraenkel, J. & Wallen, N. (1993). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education 2ed. NY:
McGraw-Hill Inc.
Fullan, M.G. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. N Y: Teachers’ College Press.
Gaither, M. (2008). Homeschool: An American History. NY: Palgrave and Macmillan.
Gall, M, Borg, W. & Gall, J. (1996). Educational research: An introduction. White Plains:
Longman.
Gathercole, R. (2007). The Well-Adjusted Child: The social benefits of homeschooling.
Denver: Mapletree Publishing Company.
Glasser, W. (1990). The quality school: Managing students without coercion. New York:
Perennial Library
Hall, S. (February 2007). Choosing the Substitute: A Profile of Homeschooling in DeKalb
163

County “Premier School District” within Georgia. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest UMI
3258303. Retrieved on 1/1/12 from
http://search.proquest.com.proxy1.cl.msu.edu/docview/304722775/fulltextPDF/13401B4
3966449E4AA4/5?accountid=12598
Hart, B. & Risley, T. (2000). Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experiences of Young
American Children. Baltimore: Paul Brookes Publishing Company.
Heath, C. & Heath, D. (2010). Switch: How to Change Things When Change is Hard. NY:
Broadway Books.
Hermitt, A. (2008). Making the Decision to Homeschool: The decision to homeschool was not
one we made lightly. January 24, 2008. Retrieved on 1/1/12 from
http://voices.yahoo.com/making-decision-homeschool-823451.html
Hernandez, B. (2012). What made you decide to homeschool? About.com: Homeschooling.
Retrieved on 1/1/12 from
http://homeschooling.about.com/od/gettingstarted/a/whyhomeschool.htm
Holt, J. C. (1964). How Children Fail. New York: Dell Pub.Co.
Holt, J. (1979), Growing Without Schooling, Volume One Issues 1 – 12; August, 1977 –
December, 1979. Cambridge: Holt Associates Inc.
Holt, J.C. (1981). Teach Your Own: A Hopeful Path to Education. New York, N.Y: Delacorte
Press/Seymour Lawrence.
Home School Foundation. (2009). Helping Families Homeschool through Hard Times. Home
School Foundation website. Retrieved 10/3/09 from
http://www.homeschoolfoundation.org
Home School Legal Defense Association. (2003, May 30). Homeschoolers shine at national
competitions. Homeschool Legal Defense Association website. Retrieved 10/3/09 from
http://www.hslda.org/docs/news/hslda/200305/200305300.asp
Home School Legal Defense Association. (2006, August 15). New Personnel, New Problems
Home School Legal Defense Association website. Retrieved 10/3/09 from
http://www.hslda.org/hs/state/ma/200608150.asp
Home School Legal Defense Association (2006, October 26). Special Education Students
Assisted Home School Legal Defense Association website. Retrieved 10/3/09 from
http://www.hslda.org/hs/state/ma/200610250.asp
Home School Legal Defense Association (January 4, 2012). @home e.vents E-lert Service:
Purcellville, VA: Home School Legal Defense Association. Retrieved on 1/4/12 from
http://www.hslda.org/athome
164

Home School Legal Defense Association. (2008). Homeschooling Your Struggling Learner.
Retrieved on 2/18/12 from
http://www.hslda.org/strugglinglearner/Struggling_Learner_Brochure.pdf
Hoover-Dempsey, K.V., & Sandler, H.M. (1995). Parental involvement in children’s education:
Why does it make a difference? Teachers College Record, 97, 310-331.
Hover-Dempsey, K.V. & Sandler, H.M. (1997). Why do parents become involved in their
children’s education? Review of Educational Research, 67, 3-42.
Howden, L. & Meyer, J. (May, 2011). Age and sex composition: 2010. US Census Briefs. United
States Department of Commerce: Washington, D.C. Retrieved on 11/22/12 from
http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-03.pdf
Institute of Educational Sciences (IESa): National Center for Statistics (2007). Issue Brief
December 2008. Retrieved on 9/30/09 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009030.pdf
Institute of Educational Sciences (IESb): National Center for Statistics. (2003). 1.1 Million
Homeschooled Students in the United States 2003. Retrieved 10/5/09 from
http://nces.ed.gov/nhes/homeschool/
Institute of Educational Sciences (IESc): National Center for Educational Statistics. (2001).
Characteristics of Homeschooled Students and their Families retrieved on 11/1/09 from
http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2001/HomeSchool/chara.asp
Institute of Educational Sciences (IESd): National Center for Educational Statistics. (2007).
Table S61. Retrieved on 11/12/09 from
http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/2009/section1/table-s-hsc-1.asp
Isenberg, E. (2007). What Have We Learned About Homeschooling? Peabody Journal of
Education, 82:2-3, 387-409. Retrieved on 12/17/11 from
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/01619560701312996
Ishizuka, K. (2000). The Unofficial Guide to Home-Schooling. Foster City: IDG Books
Worldwide.
Izumi, L. (2009). Public Schools Mask Poor Performance; Students Suffer. The Washington
Examiner; 12/18/2009. Retrieved 11/18/11 from http://findarticles.com/p/newsarticles/examiner-the-washington-dc/mi_8118/is_20091218/public-schools-mask-poorperformance/ai_n52043421/.
Jeub, C. (1995). Why parents choose home schooling. Retrieved on 12/18/11from
http://ezproxy.msu.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62626119?account
id=12598
Kagan, D. (2008). School Safety-How safe are our schools? Berman & Simmons Professional
165

Organization Retrieved 11/12/09 from
http://www.bermansimmons.com/article_detail.php?id=58
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Kapitulik, B. (September 2011). Resisting Schools, Reproducing Families: Gender and the
Politics of Homeschooling. UMI 3482634. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest Retrieved on 1/1/12
from
http://search.proquest.com.proxy1.cl.msu.edu/docview/910886998/fulltextPDF/134010F
33D33E206BF/4?accountid=12598
Katz, Michael. (1976). A History of Compulsory Education Laws. Fastback Series,
No. 75. Bicentennial Series Phi Delta Kappa: Bloomington. Retrieved 11/12/09 from
http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/3
2/d2/1b.pdf
Kessler, R. (2000). The Soul of Education: Helping Students Find Connection, Compassion, and
Character at School. Alexandria: ASCD.
Kiesling, A. (8/16/2004). Why Johnny Learns at Home: Homeschoolers are an enthusiastic and
growing market for books and study guides. Retrieved 10/29/09 from
http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA444653.html
Kingston, S., & Medlin, R. (2006). Empathy, Altruism, and Moral Development in
Homeschooled Children. Home School Researcher 16(4). Retrieved 10/4/09 from
http://www.nheri.org/Volume-16-Issue-4/
Kleppe, I.A., & Gronhaug, K. (December 2009). Issue streams and open solutions: A new
approach to family-home decisions. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal,
Vol.38. No 2, pp. 168-185.
Klicka, C. (2006). Home School Heroes: the Struggle & Triumph of Home Schooling in
America. Nashville: B&H Publishing Group
Kunzman, R. (2009). Write these laws on your children: Inside the world of conservative
Christian homeschooling. Boston: Beacon Press
Langley, A., Mintzberg, H., Pitcher, P., Posada, E. & Saint-Macary. J. (May-June, 1995).
Opening up Decision Making: The View from the Black Stool. Organization Science ,
Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 260-279. Hanover: Institute for Operations Research and the
Management Sciences (INFORMS). Retrieved on 1/8/12 from
http://www.jstor.org/stable/2635251
Latham, A.S. (May, 1998). Home schooling. Educational Leadership, 55, 85-86.

166

Laughlin, L. (2011). Maternity leave and employment patterns: 2006-2008. Current population
report. 70-128. U.S. Census Bureau: Washington, D.C. Retrieved on 11/212/12 from
http://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/p70-128.pdf
Lechtreck, R. (1994, January) The Case for Homeschooling The Freeman: Ideas on Liberty,
44(1) retrieved 10/3/09 from http://www.thefreemanonline.org/columns/the-case-forhomeschooling/
Leedy, P. (1997). Practical Research: Planning and Design, sixth edition. Upper Saddle River:
Merrill Publishers.
Leichman, A. (1-7-09). Gov’t Survey Reveals Homeschool Growth. The Christian Post
Retrieved 11/1/09 from http://www.christianpost.com/article/20090107/gov-t-surveyreveals-homeschooling-growth/index.html
Leslie, L. (1972). Are high response rates essential to valid surveys? Social Science Research, 1
323-334.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science; selected theoretical papers (ed. D. Cartwright).
New York: Harper & Row.
LifeTips. (2012). Home School Tips. Retrieved on 11/22/12 from
http://homeschool.lifetips.com/cat/55371/special-needs-gifted/index.html
Lines, P. (Summer 2000). Homeschooling Comes of Age. The Public Interest; 140; ProQuest
p74 Retrieved on 1/1/12 from
http://search.proquest.com.proxy1.cl.msu.edu/docview/222061562/fulltextPDF/134018D
0C1B7CB79E70/15?accountid=12598
Lipham, J.M. (1981).Effective Principal, Effective School. Reston, VA: National Association of
Secondary Principals.
Lipham, J.M. & Hoeh, J.A. (1974). The principalship: Foundations and functions. NY: Harper
& Row.
Lipham, J.M. & Rankin, R.E. (1982). Change, Leadership, and Decision Making in Improving
Secondary Schools. Wisconsin Center for Educational Research. Retrieved on 1/5/12
from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED223004.pdf
Lips, D. & Fineberg, E. (April 3, 2008). Homeschooling: A Growing Option in America.
Backgrounder (2122). Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation Retrieved 11/12/09
from
http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/3
d/d6/66.pdf
Lois, J. (2006). Role Strain, Emotion Management, and Burnout: Homeschooling Mothers’
167

Adjustment to the Teacher Role. Symbolic Interaction, 29:4, 507-530. Retrieved on
12/27/11 from
http://www.jstor.org.proxy2.cl.msu.edu/stable/pdfplus/10.1525/si.2006.29.4.507.pdf?
acceptTC=true . Stable URL: http://jstor.org/stable/10.1525/si.2006.29.4.507
Lyons, L. and G. Gordon. (May 2002). Homeschooling: Expanding its ranks and reputation.
The Gallup Poll Briefing (May 2002): 21-22. Retrieved on 11/15/2011 from
http://search.proquest.com.proxy2.cl.msu.edu.proxy1.cl.msu.edu.proxy2.cl.msu.edu.prox
y1.cl.msu.edu/docview/200062519?accountid=12598
Marris, P. H. (1975). Loss and Change. New York: Doubleday.
Marsh, D. D. (1999). Preparing our schools for the 21st century. 1999 ASCD yearbook
Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
Marshner, C. C. (1984). A Blueprint for education reform. Chicago: Regnery/Gateway
Martin-Chang, S., Gould, O. & Meuse, R.. (2011). Impact of Schooling on Academic
Achievement: Evidence from Homeschooled and Traditionally Schooled Students.
Canadian Journal of Behavioual Science, 43:3, 195-202. Retrieved on 12/17/11 from
http://www.home-ed.vic.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Martin-Chang-Gould-etMeuse-2011.pdf
Maxwell, J. (2005). Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach, Second Edition. LA:
Sage Publications, Inc.
Mayberry, M. (1987). The 1987-1988 Oregon home school survey: And overview of findings.
Home School Researcher, 4(1), 1-9.
Mcalister-Kizzier, D. (2009). Division of Labor. Retrieved on 11/12/09 from
http://www.answers.com/topic/division-of-labour
McKeon, C. (2007). A Mixed Methods Nested Analysis of Homeschooling Styles, Instructional
Practices, and Reading Methodologies. Doctoral Dissertation. Capella University,
Minneapolis, MN
Mead, S. (June 27, 2006). The truth about boys and girls. Retrieved on 11/12/09 from
http://www.educationsector.org/research/research_show.htm?doc_id=378705
Meighan, R. (1997). The Next Learning System: and why homeschoolers are trailblazers.
Nottingham: Educational Heretics Press.
Merriam, S. (1988). Case Study Research in Education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Michigan Homeschool Support Groups website. (2009). Retrieved 10/31/09 from
168

http://www.homeschoolingmichigan.com/supportgroups.html
Miles, M. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks:Sage
Publication.
Millman, G. & M. (2008). Homeschooling: A Families’ Journey. NY: Penguin Group.
Monroe, P. (1971). Founding of the American Public School System: A History of Education in
the United States from the Early Settlements to the Close of the Civil War Period. NY:
Hafner Publishing Company.
Montgomery, L. (1989). The effect of homeschooling on the leadership skills of home schooled
students. Doctoral dissertation. Seattle University, Seattle, WA.
Moon, V.B. (Feb. 9, 2011). Tossed By The Fates. Retrieved 2/18/2012 from
http://militaryhomeschooling.wordpress.com
Moore, R.S. (1973). Let’s Keep the Little Kids at Home. Compact, 7:5, pp. 22 11/1/73.
Moore, R.S. & D. N. (1975). Better Late Than Early: A New Approach to Your Child’s
Education. New York: Reader’s Digest Press.
Moore, R.S. (1979). School Can Wait. Utah: Brigham Young University Press.
Moore, R.S. (1979). American’s Greatest Educational System. ERIC Clearinghouse.
Moore, R.S. (1984). The Cradle and the Gap. Marshner, Connaught, Ed. A Blueprint for
Education Reform. p231-250
Moore, R.S. (1985). It Depends on Your Aim. Phi Delta Kappan 67:1 (Sep 1985): 62-64.
Mother Earth News.com eds. (1980). The Plowboy Interview: John Holt. Mother Earth News
July August 1980. Retrieved 11/12/09 from http://www.motherearthnews.com/NatureCommunity/1980-07-01/Plowboy-Interview-John-Holt.aspx
Mugo, F. W. (2003). Sampling In Research. Retrieved 12/2/09 from
http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/tutorial/Mugo/tutorial.htm
Mur, C. ed. (2003). Home Schooling. Farmington Hills: Greenhaven Press.
Muslim Homeschool Central (2003, March) Starting Out. Retrieved 10.4.09 from
http://ourseeds.tripod.com/homeschool.html
Naisbitt, J. (1982). Megatrends. New York: Warner Books, Inc.

169

Nansel, T., Overpeck, Pilla, M.R., Ruan,W.J., Simons-Morton, S., & Scheidt, S. (2001) Bullying
behaviors among US youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment.
Journal of the American Medical Association 285: 2094-2131.
Nemer, K. M. (2002). Understudied education: Toward building a homeschooling research
agenda. occasional paper Teachers College, Columbia University, Box 181, 230
Thompson Hall, 525 West 120th Street, New York, NY Tel: 212-678-3259; Fax: 212678-3474; e-mail: ncspe@columbia.edu; Web site: http://www.ncspe.org. For full text:
http://www.ncspe.(TRUNCATED). Retrieved on 12/11/11 from
http://ezproxy.msu.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/62165236?account
id=12598
Newport, F. (December 24, 2009). This Christmas, over 78% Identify as Christians. Gallup
Wellbeing. Retrieved on 11/22/12 from http://www.gallup.com/poll/124793/ThisChristmas-78-Americans-Identify-Christian.aspx
Olsen, N.B. (2008). Understanding parental motivation to homeschool: A qualitative case study.
Doctoral Dissertation. The University of Montana, Missoula, Montana. Retrieved
09/12/12 from http://www.docstoc.com/docs/47000455/Understanding-parentalmotivation-to-home-school-A-qualitative-case-study
Orazova, G. (2010). Parental Autonomy in Support of Children’s Decision-Making upon their
Education and Opportunities for Diverse Interaction: A Case Study of Homeschooling
Groups in Dekalb, IL Northern Illinois University. Retrieved on 1/5/12 from
http://search.proquest.com.proxy2.cl.msu.edu.proxy1.cl.msu.edu/docview/520404575/ful
ltextPDF/134165C67B64047D3EA/7?accountid=12598
Paris, K (1994). A leadership model for planning and implementing change for school-to-work
transition (pp. 22-25). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Center on
Education and Work. Retrieved 11/12/09 from
http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/envrnmnt/stw/sw0goals.htm.
Paton, K. (2007). Models of Educational Decision Making. University of South Hampton:
Teaching and Learning Research Programme and Economic and Social Research Council
(UK). Retrieved on 1/13/12 from
http://www.education.soton.ac.uk/files/projects/nphe/Working_Paper_6.pdf
Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Method. Newbury Park: Sage
Publications.
Payne, J. (2003). Choice at the end of compulsory schooling: A research review. DfES Research
Report London: DfES. Retrieved on 1/13/12 from
https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/RR414.pdf
Perkins, D. (1992). Smart Schools. NY: The Free Press.

170

Peterson, P. (1985). The Politics of School Reform: 1870-1940. Chicago: The University of
Chicago Press.
Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 Supreme Court (1925). Retrieved 12/23/2011 from
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6094501649208458004&q=major+trends+i
n+compulsory+schooling&hl=en&as_sdt=2,3
Public Law. (2002). No Child Left Behind. PUBLIC LAW 107–110—JAN. 8, 2002. Retrieved
11/12/09 from http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/107-110.pdf
Rakestraw, J. (1988). An Analysis of home schooling for elementary school age children in
Alabama. Doctoral dissertation. University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Al.
Rankin, R.E. (1981). A qualitative study of the decision-making processes and leadership
behavior at the teaching-advising level in selected secondary schools. Technical Report
No. 576. Madison: Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Individualized
Schooling.
Ray, B. (2011). 2.04 Million Homeschool Students in the US in 2010. National Home
Education Research Institute. Retrieved on 1/6/12 from
http://www.nheri.org/HomeschoolPopulationReport2010.pdf
Ray, B. (2009, August 10). Homeschooling Across America: Academic Achievement and
Demographic Characteristics. Retrieved 10/4/09 from National Home Education
Research Institute http://www.nheri.org/Latest/Homeschooling-Across-AmericaAcademic-Achievement-and-Demographic-Characteristics.html
Ray B. (2009, August 10). Research Facts on Homeschooling. Retrieved 10/4/09 from National
Home Education Research Institute http://www.nheri.org/Research-Facts-onHomeschooling.html
Ray, B. (2009). Homeschooling: The Ameliorator of Negative Influences on Learning. Peabody
Journal of Education 75(1&2) pp71 – 106.
Ray, B. (2003). Homeschooling Grows Up: HSLDA’s synopsis of a new research study on
adults who were homeschooled. National Home Education Research Institute, Home
School Legal Defense Association. Retrieved on 1/6/12 from
http://www.hslda.org/research/ray2003/default.asp
Ray, B. (1990). A nationwide study of home education: Family characteristics, legal matters,
and student achievement. Salem, OR: National Home Education Research Institute.
Ray, B. & Wartes, J. (1987). The Academic Achievement and Affective Development of Homeschooled Children. Published in VanGalen, J. (1991) Home Schooling. Norwood, NJ:
Ablex Publishing Company.

171

Reed, D. (1986). The First Home-School Catalogue, Second Edition, Revised. Lyndon: Brook
Farm Books.
Reed, L. (February, 1997). Homeschool Heroes. Freeman Ideas on Liberty. 47(2). Retrieved on
11/12/09 from http://www.thefreemanonline.org/columns/homeschool-heroes/#
Reeves, D. (2006). The Learning Leader: How to Focus School Improvement for Better Results.
Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Reiss, D. & Oliveri, M.E. (1980). Family paradigm and family coping: A proposal for linking the
family’s intrinsic adaptive capacities to its responses to stress. Family Relations,
29(October), 431-444.
Rest, J.R., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M. & Thoma, S. (1999). Postconventional Moral Thinking: A
Neo-Kohlbergian Approach. Mahweh: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Ricci, C. (2007). Are important and authentic Teachers members of our family? The Journal of
Unschooling and Alternative Learning. 1:2 Journal Retrieved on 1/4/12 from
http://jual.nipissingu.ca/Archives/v122/v1221.pdf
Richman, H. (2009). PA Homeschoolers’ Newsletter. Retrieved 10/30/09 from
http://www.pahomeschoolers.com/
Richman, S. (1995). Separation of School & State: How to Liberate America’s Families.
Fairfax, VA: Future of Freedom Foundation.
Rubin, H. & Rubin, I. (2005). Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data, second
edition. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Rudestam, K. & Newton, R. (2007). Surviving Your Dissertation: A Comprehensive Guide to
Content and Process, third edition. LA: SAGE Publications.
Rudner, L (1999, March 23) Scholastic Achievement and Demographic Characteristics of Home
School Students in 1998. Education Analysis Policy Archives, 7(8). Retrieved 10/4/09
from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v7n8/
Sandeen, D. (2012). Negative Peer Pressure. Retrieved 2/18/12 from
http://teens.lovetoknow.com/Negative_Peer_Pressure .
Scherer, M. (2004). A Nation At Risk Retrieved on 1/3/12 from
http://www.nd.edu/~rbarger/www7/nationrs.html
Scogin, L. (1986). Home school survey. Great Falls: Home School Legal Defense Association
Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A guide for Researchers in Education
and the Social Sciences, Third Edition. Teachers College Press: NY.
172

Sheffer, S. (1995). A Sense of Self: Listening to Homeschooled Adolescent Girls. Portsmouth,
NH: Boynton/Cook Publishers
Shyers, L.E. (1992). Comparison of social adjustment between home and traditionally schooled
students. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. ProQuest.
Siegal, M. (2008). Marvelous minds: The discovery of what children know. Oxford: Oxford
University Press
Simon, H.A. (1960). The new science of management decision. NY: Harper & Brothers
Publishing.
Somerville, S. (2003). Together for Freedom: Passing Liberty to the Next Generation. The
Homeschool Report. 19:2 Retrieved on 1/5/12 from
http://www.hslda.org/courtreport/V19N2/V19N201.asp
Supreme Court of the United States. (1954). Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka. 347 U.S.
483 (1954). Retrieved on 1/8/12 from
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12120372216939101759&q=major+trends
+in+compulsory+schooling&hl=en&as_sdt=2,3
Swadener, B & Lubeck, S. Eds. (1995). Children and Families “At Promise.” Albany: State
University of NY Press.
Swindoll, C.R. (1989). Living Above the Level of Mediocrity. Dallas, TX: Word Publishing.
Taylor, J. (1986). Doctoral Dissertation Taylor's thesis, Self-Concept in Home-Schooling
Children, Andrews University: UMI, DA8624219.)
Time For Learning (TFL). (2009). Homeschool Statistics: Data on Homeschooling. Retrieved
10.5.09 from http://www.time4learning.com/homeschool/homeschoolstatistics.shtml
Toppo, G. (2009, May 28). Profound shift in kind of families who are homeschooling their
children. USA Today. Retrieved on 10/4/09 from
http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2009-05-28-homeschooling_N.htm
U.S. Department of Education. (2004). Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004. Retrieved 11/12/09
from http://idea.ed.gov/
Van Galen, J. (1987). Explaining home education: Parents accounts of their decisions to teach
their own children. The Urban Review, 19(3), 161-177.
Van Galen, J. (1988). Ideology, curriculum, pedagogy in home education. Education and Urban
Society, 21(1), 52- 68.

173

Van Galen, J. & Pitman, M. (1991). Home Schooling: Political, Historical, and Pedagogical
Perspectives. Norwood. Ablex Publishing Co.
Vanderbilt Television News Archives (VTNA). (October 24, 1971). Headline:
Desegregation/Busing/Michigan. Retrieved on 1/9/12 from
http://tvnews.vanderbilt.edu/program.pl?ID=454443
Wallman, K. (2012). American’s children in brief: Key indicators of well-being. Federal
Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics. U.S. Government Printing Office:
Washington, D.C. Retrieved on 11/22/12 from
http://www.childstats.gov/pdf/ac2012/ac_12.pdf
Wartes, J. (1990). Recent results from the Washington Homeschool Research Project. Home
School Researcher, 6, 1–7.
Weick, K. (1971). Group processes, family processes, and problem solving. In Aldous, J.
(1971). Family problem solving: A symposium on theoretical, methodological, and
substantive concerns. p.3-38 Hinsdale, Ill: Dryden Press.
Welch, S. & Short, C. eds. (2001). The Teaching Home: Questions & Answers Concerning Home
Schooling. Portland: The Teaching Home Magazine. Retrieved 10/5/09 from
http://www.teachinghome.com/started/q&a/qanda.pdf
Welner, K. & Welner, K. (1999, April 11). Contextualizing Homeschooling Data: A Response
to Rudner. Education Analysis Policy Archives, 7(13). Retrieved 10/4/09 from
http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v7n13.html
Welner, K. (2002, March). Exploring the Democratic Tensions within Parent’s Decisions To
Homeschool: Occasional Paper #45. NY: Columbia University National Center for the
Privatization in Education. Retrieved 10/4/09 from
http://www.ncspe.org/publications_files/690_OP45.pdf
Wenders, J. & Clements, A. (2007). An Analysis of Economic Impact of Home and Private
Schooling in Nevada. Home School Researcher 17(2) p.13-35 Retrieved 10/4/09 from
http://www.nheri.org/Volume-17-Issue-2/
White, S., Moore, M. & Squires, J. Examination of Previously Homeschooled College Students
with the Big Five Model of Personality. Home School Researcher 25(1) p. 1-7 Retrieved
10/4/09 from http://www.nheri.org/Volume-25-Issue-1/
Wise Bauer, S & Wise, J. (2009). The Well-Trained Mind. NY: W.W. Norton & Co.
Yudof, M.G. (1979) When Governments Speak: Toward a Theory of Government Expression
and the First Amendment, Texas Law Review57: 863–918

174