'AJ~k9"V"" mllllljflllllflllllllllll‘lSl LIBRARY38 1 Michigan State Unlvordtyfi This is to (:81 tify thal‘the thesis entitled Tritium Transport Through a Fractured Till in Michigan presented by John Maris Gobins has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for M.S. dpmvein Geological Sciences MAX; / Majo rofessox Date 12 Ma! 1989 0.7639 MS U is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Institution RETURNING MATERIALS: MSU Place in book drop to remove this ‘ checkout from your record. FINES LIBRARlF-b will be charged if book is returned after the date stamped below. TRITIUM TRANSPORT THROUGH A FRACI‘URED TILL IN MICHIGAN By John Maris Gobins A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Geological Sciences 1989 :w.L St. "I ABSTRACT TRITIUM TRANSPORT THROUGH A FRACTURED TILL IN MICHIGAN By John Maris Gobins The concentration of tritium in 40 ground-water samples collected from a fractured clay-rich till in southeastern Michigan was found tO range from 0 to 44 TU. Bomb tritium was identified in samples at depths of 1.5 to 42 m below the water table while pre-bomb tritium was identified in samples from depths of 5.0 to 54 In. The distribution of tritium in the ground-water reservoir was simulated using a one-dimensional solute transport model. Based on the shallowest occurrence of non-tritiated water, the dispersivity value of the matrix flow system in the upper till unit was found to be less than 0.025 m. Bomb tritium penetration tO depths beyond those predicted by the model can be explained by the presence of a fracture flow system. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Dr. Grahame Larson, thesis chairman, is thanked for suggesting the project and being actively involved until its completion. Drs. David Long and Roger Wallace are thanked for serving on the thesis committee and providing valuable suggestions during the course Of the study. Two adjunct committee members are thanked for their significant contributions. Robert Hayes at the Michigan Department of Natural Resources made available the hydrogeologic data and provided numerous insights. Richard Mandle at the US. Geological Survey provided most of the guidance during the computer simulations Of ground-water flow. Mitchell Adelman collected and delivered the water samples. Valuable insights were also provided by William Iversen and Roger Noyce at the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Norman Grannemann, Michael McDonald, and David Westjohn and at the US. Geological Survey, and colleagues William Monaghan, Michael Miller, John Gillespie, Manrico Delcore, David Regalbuto, Gregory FOOte, and Pierre Bruno. Dr. John Wilband and Karlis Kaugars provided computer assistance. The Environmental Isotope Laboratory at the University of Waterloo is thanked for its prompt and courteous service. Dr. James Hancock Of the Horticulture Department and Dr. James Tiedje Of the Crop and Soil Science Department at Michigan State iii University are thanked for permission to use the liquid scintillation counters. The Water Research Institute at Michigan State University is thanked for funding this study. MIlS paldies maniem vecakiem! iv TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES INTRODUCTION STUDY AREA GEOLOGY AGE AND ORIGIN OF THE DRIFT HYDROLOGY NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF GROUND-WATER FLOW SAMPLING METHODS STABLE ISOTOPE RESULTS TRITIUM RESULTS DISCUSSION CONCLUSION APPENDICES APPENDIX A - Regional Geologic and Hydrologic Analysis APPENDIX B - Cross Sections Through the Study Area APPENDIX C - Simulated Hydraulic Head Distributions APPENDIX D - Lateral Tritium Distribution APPENDIX E - Site Soil Types vii viii 9 9 15 17 20 22 26 27 35 39 41 43 APPENDIX F - Tritium Systematics APPENDIX G - Sample Preparation for Tritium Analysis Pre-distillation Electrolytic Enrichment Post-distillation APPENDIX H - Liquid Scintillation Analysis Introduction Theory Of Liquid Scintillation Counting Factors Affecting Counting Efficiency Quench Monitoring and Curve Generation Counting Window Generation APPENDIX I - Tritium Activity Calculations APPENDIX J - Two Sigma Error Determination APPENDIX K - Tritium Input Function BIBLIOGRAPHY 46 49 49 50 51 53 53 53‘ 55 58 60 62 65 67 69 Table 1. Stable isotope data. Table 2. Tritium data. LIST OF TABLES vii 18 21 Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 3. Figure 4. Figure 5. Figure 6. Figure 7. Figure 8. Figure 9. LIST OF FIGURES Geologic map showing location of study area and surficial deposits Of Genesee County (after Wiitala et al., 1963). Geologic cross section showing simulated head distribution along line X-X’ Of Figure 4 (contour interval = 0.5 m). All elevations in m.a.s.l. Elevation versus percentage Of soil borings indicating coarse material (asterisks- all borings, circles- western half Of site data). Observed potentiometric surface contour maps and location Of cross section X-X’ (all elevations in m.a.s.l.). A Upper Till (contour interval = 0.5 m) ‘B Middle Sand (contour interval = 0.25 m) C Bedrock (contour interval = 0.5 m) Elevation of screened interval tOp versus elevation Of static water level and geologic units sampled. Open circles- upper till, Open squares- middle sand, filled circles- lower till, filled squares- bedrock. Stable isotope composition of water sampled from drift wells in Michigan. Solid line- Lake Simcoe meteoric line (Desaulniers et al., 1981). Simulated and Observed tritium values in the upper till unit at the facility. Regional bedrock surface contour map (contour interval = 2 m). Regional bedrock surface lithology map (filled circles- shale, Open circles- sandstone). viii 10 16 19 24 30 31 Figure 10. Figure 11. Figure 12. Figure 13. Figure 14. Figure 15. Figure 16. Figure 17. Figure 18. Regional drift isopach map (contour interval = 2 m). Regional map showing height Of bedrock potentiometric surface above bedrock surface (contour interval = 2 m). Regional bedrock potentiometric surface map (contour interval = 2 m). Map showing location of wells sampled and location of cross sections in relation tO the Berlin & Farro site boundary. Cross sections A-A’ and B-B’. Cross sections CC and D—D’. Figure showing the effect Of varying lithologies on simulated head distribution along cross section X-X’ in Figure 4 (contour interval = 0.5 m). Lateral distribution Of tritium within the upper till unit (all values in TU). Tritium input function. 32 33 34 36 37 38 4O 42 68 INTRODUCTION The clay-rich tills which characterize much Of the Great Lakes basin have traditionally been viewed as low permeability deposits that have limited potential for water supply (Norris, 1963). For this reason, they have been commonly used for containment Of waste material and it has even been proposed that, in places, the tills may provide a suitable media for the disposal of hazardous waste (Desaulniers et al., 1981) Within the last several decades, however, researchers have increasingly noted the occurrence of fractures within till deposits Of the British Isles and Great Plains region of North America (Horberg, 1952; Fookes, 1965; Kazi and Knill, 1973; Grisak et al., 1976: Eyles and Sladen, 1981; Hendry, 1982; Keller et al., 1986; Cravens and Ruedisili. 1987). These fractures may have Openings as large as several centimeters and have been Observed to depths Of over 10 meters (Eyles and Sladen, 1981; Keller et al., 1986). The presence Of such fractures in tills Of the Great Lakes basin would be of considerable interest since a regional low-level radioactive waste disposal facility could be associated with till deposits within Michigan (MILLRWC, 1987). The purpose Of this study is to examine the ground-water flow system in a fractured clay-rich till in southeastern Michigan and to determine the effect Of the fractures on the movement Of "bomb" tritium through the till. After a ground-water flow model is developed for the till, a one-dimensional solute transport model is employed to simulate the distribution of bomb tritium with depth. STUDY AREA The study area for this investigation is the Berlin and Farro Liquid Incineration Facility (BFLIF) which is located approximately five and one-half kilometers south of the town Of Swartz Creek, Gaines Township, Genesee County, Michigan ('1‘. 6 N., R. 5 13., Sec. 23). The 0.14 kmz facility lies exclusively on till plain (Figure 1) and at one time included an incinerator, a sludge lagoon, and a landfill. As a result Of repeated improper handling Of toxic and hazardous wastes by the facility Operators during the 1970’s, the facility is currently included in the CERCLA (Superfund) National Priority List for remedial action and is presently under the control of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (D’ Appolonia, 1983). Since 1982, several hydrogeologic studies have been initiated at the BFLIF, mainly at the request of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, to provide the state h with information necessary to meet Environmental Protection Agency requirements for federal funding Of cleanup Operations. These studies include magnetometer, resistivity. and seismic surveys, fracture trace analysis, test drilling, and ground-water and soil sampling (Woodward and Clyde, 1989). TO date, 56 Observation wells and more than 100 test borings have been drilled on or near the facility. The majority of Observation wells are screened in glaCial drift, but some are completed in bedrock. Remedial action has included removal Of landfill and lagoonal contents and excavation Of buried drums. GEOLOGY The BFLIF is located on a gently rolling till plain, deposited by the Saginaw glacial lobe, which is bordered on the north by the Flint moraine and on the south by the XATIN End moraine Till plain E Outwash plain Lake plain Bar/ beach 10 km Figure 1. Geologic map showing location of study area and surficial deposits of Genesee County (after Wiitala et al., 1963). 4 Gaines moraine (Levrett and Taylor, 1915; Figure 1). Surface elevation ranges between 250 In in the northeast and central parts of the facility to 247.5 In in the western part. The Pennsylvanian Saginaw Formation is the uppermost bedrock formation beneath the facility. The elevation Of the bedrock surface ranges between 220 In along the eastern boundary Of the facility to less than 205 m in isolated low spots in the central and southwestern parts Of the facility. Boring logs show that it consists Of light gray to grayish-brown and brownish-gray very fine- to coarse-grained sandstone. Interbedded with the sandstone are thin layers Of shale and laminae of dark gray clays. Crossbeddin g in the sandstone is common and consists Of alternating bands of dark and light, fine- and coarse-grained quartz. Cements are usually non-calcareous. The interbedded shale is typically gray tO dark gray, firm to very hard, fissile, micaceous, and thinly bedded. Although the rock quality designation (RQD) for the Saginaw ranges from 0% to 98%. the average RQD value is 75% to 90% (Woodward and Clyde, 1989). The unconsolidated sediments which overlie the bedrock are glacial in origin and were deposited during the WOOdfordian stage Of the Wisconsinan glaciation (Farrand and Eschman, 1974). Based on monitor well and boring logs, two relatively distinct layers of till, separated by a 0-5 m thick, discontinuous and variable, water-bearing sand and gravel layer, underlie the facility (Figures 2, 14, and 15). The lower till is an 18 to 27 m thick, very stiff to hard, moist to dry, gray clayey silt tO silty clay with occasional sand lenses and trace amounts of gravel. Characteristic Of this till is its resistance tO penetration with blows per foot typically exceeding 50. The sand and gravel lenses within this till vary in composition from silty sand to fine-grained sand tO coarse-grained sand and gravel and are typically dense and wet. In areas 4.33: 3 80396—0 =< .AE nd n 3235 3988 v 253m .0 .x-x on: «no? caustic emu: econ—25a ”arson“ .5303 «.38 ammo—000 .N Ouswfi ICON 2003mm .3 I 03 M V Iowa u j.» 526.. O N loam \w) e oz 240- L'LJ .J __t UJ _ 235 I I r l r I l I 1 O 20 40 5'0 80 100 % COARSE Figure 3. Elevation versus percentage of soil borings indicating coarse material (asterisks- all borings, circles- western half Of site data). 8 (Figure 3). Individual borings typically encounter 1 to 3 m Of coarse sediment in the upper 12 m of the drift. The cumulative thickness of the coarse sediment in each boring may be represented by a single sand layer or by several layers separated by clay stringers. Since the thickness of the coarse zone and the thickness of the lenses is different, it can be inferred that some vertical ofi’set exists between the lenses. Laterally, almost 50% Of all wells and borings indicate coarse material at an elevation of 244 m and, when logs from only the western half Of the site are used, this value increases to nearly 65%. This indicates that, at this elevation, the majority of coarse- grained lenses occur in the western half of the study area. Lateral extent of individual lenses is more difficult to determine but in some instances, a lens encountered in one boring has not been encountered in another boring as little as 5 m away. Fractures within the upper till unit have been intersected by approximately one- third Of the soil borings at depths of l to 5 In. These fractures are typically vertical to sub-vertical and discontinuous and may be empty or filled with trace amounts of sand and/or root material. The fracture aperture is generally less than several millimeters and fracture spacing near the surface is approximately 5-10 cm based on Observations at a excavation 1 km north Of the facility. Walls of the fractures are typically smooth and contain a thin brown oxidation rind developed on the gray matrix material. Fractures with this type Of appearance in tills have also been described by other workers in North America (Williams and Farvolden, 1969; Grisak et al., 1976; Hendry, 1983a). Brown and gray mottles are often associated with the fractures within and just beneath the soil ZOI'IC. AGE AND ORIGIN OF THE DRIFT While an exact age has not been assigned to the drift beneath the facility, it is believed to be Late Wisconsinan. A similar drift stratigraphy has been described for Saginaw Lobe drift approximately 100 to 150 km southwest of the study area by Monaghan and Larson (1986) and has been correlated with drift sequences of the Lake Michigan Lobe in southwestern Michigan and the Huron-Erie Lobe in central Ohio. They describe two tills separated by an intervening variable sand and gravel unit. The lower and upper tills have been assigned ages of approximately 16,500 yr BF. and 14,780 yr B.P., respectively. They associated the sand and gravel unit which separates the two tills with the Erie Interstade (15,500 to 15,000 yr B.P.) which represents a major retreat of the ice from the region (Dreimanis and Goldthwait, 1973). As a result of its hardness and scarcity of sand and gravel lenses, the lower till at the facility is believed to represent lodgement till. The propensity Of sand lenses in the upper till and its lesser consolidation, on the other hand, would suggest that it formed as ' ablation till. HYDROLOGY The ground surface at the facility generally slopes westward and, accordingly, surface water is removed in that direction. Approximately 150 In west of the facility, Slocum Drain collects the runoff. Three "water-bearing" zones have been identified at the facility (Figure 4). The uppermost zone includes the sand lenses in the upper till unit between an elevation of approximately 240 m to 245 In. The middle zone includes the sand layer which 10 246.76 j I 247.93 0 \ \ \ B - / 244V q,“ 245.25 . 245.37 //////’ .24542 45.25 0// 245.33 . ”5.5 . 245.41 / . 245.67 '245.29 o 245.55 245.93 . \ . 244.98 0 244.52 / 245-0° . 245.40 / 245.50 .2‘5.‘ 7 / .245.“ / /246-00 0 100 200!!! 1 J r ° 246.10 Figure 4. Observed potentiometric surface contour maps and location of cross section X-X’ (all elevations in m.a.s.l.). A Upper Till (contour interval = 0.5 m) B Middle Sand (contour interval = 0.25 m) C Bedrock (contour interval = 0.5 m) 11 separates the upper and lower tills and whose elevation ranges from 230 m to 240 m. The lowermost water-bearing zone is represented by the bedrock. The potentiometric surfaces of all three water-bearing zones are shown in Figure 4. The potentiometric surface of the upper water-bearing zone slopes southwestward and northeastward from a northwest-southeast-oriented divide and has a horizontal hydraulic gradient of essentially zero in the central part of the facility to 0.01 in the southwestern and southeastern parts. The potentiometric surface of the middle water- bearing zone, on the other hand, slopes toward the northwest and has a horizontal hydraulic gradient of approximately 0.00125. The potentiometric surface of the lower water-bearing zone slopes to the north and has a horizontal hydraulic gradient of approximately 0.005. Vertical hydraulic gradients between the various water-bearing zones were calculated using water levels recorded in nested wells two weeks before sampling. The average vertical hydraulic gradient between the upper till unit and the middle sand unit is 0.22 and downward. Between the middle sand unit and the bedrock, the vertical hydraulic gradient in the northwest part of the facility is 0.013 and downward. However, in the eastern part and south Of the facility, the average vertical hydraulic gradient between the bedrock and middle sand unit is 0.01 and upward. Also, the similarity of water levels recorded in the upper till unit near the center of the facility suggests that some of the sand lenses may be hydraulically interconnected. Although some shallow wells did show annual water level fluctuations as great as 2 m, annual water level fluctuations for most of the monitor wells were generally less than 1 m. Slug and hail tests were performed in the bedrock and drift to Obtain hydraulic 12 conductivity values. In the bedrock wells, inflatable packers were used to isolate several zones for testing. In the drift wells, however, the interval tested was represented by the length of the screened interval. The Hvorslev (1951) method was used to calculate hydraulic conductivity. The average for 20 bedrock hydraulic conductivity measurements was found to be 9.9 x 10‘7 m/s and to range from 4.6 x 10'8 to 1.0 x 10'5 m/s. The average hydraulic conductivity of the lower till unit, based on one measurement, was found to be 6.7 x 10‘8 m/s. The average hydraulic conductivity for the middle sand unit, based on 11 measurements, was found to be 4.4 x 10'5 m/s and to range from 1.9 x 10‘6 to 2.0 x 10‘4 m/s. The average hydraulic conductivity of the sand lenses in the upper till unit, based on nineteen measurements, was found to be 5.1 x 10'5 m/s and to range from 7.1 x 10'7 to 2.1 x 10'4 m/s. NUMERICAL SIMUALTTON OF GROUND-WATER FLOW A three-dimensional finite-difference flow model (McDonald and Harbaugh, 1988) was applied in two dimensions along a northwest-southeast-Onented cross-section X-X’ through the central part of the facility area (Figures 2 and 4). The modeled section was divided into 336 rectilinear nodes, 21 in the horizontal direction (X) and 16 in the vertical direction (Z). The upper till unit was divided into eight layers, the middle sand unit into two layers, the lower till unit into five layers, and the bedka into one layer. The top layer was modeled as unconfined while the remaining layers were modeled as confined. A recharge well was used for the bedrock layer along the southeastern boundary of the cross section to account for flow across that boundary. No recharge wells, however, were used for the drift along the southeastern boundary of the cross 13 section because flow across that boundary was assumed to be negligible. Discharge wells were used for the bedrock and the drift along the northwestern boundary of the cross section to account for flow across that boundary. Recharge was applied evenly across the entire cross section at a rate of 0.10 m/yr. To Obtain this value, peak discharge rates for Swartz Creek, which drains the till plain containing the facility and has a gaging station approximately 12 km northeast of the facility, were subjected to baseflow separation (U.S.G.S, 1980). The horizontal hydraulic conductivity (Kb) values used in the simulation were those obtained from the slug and bail tests. For the bedrock and middle sand units, the highest field-measured Kb values were applied because most of the water in these areally relatively extensive geologic units would move through the zones of highest permeability. For the lower till unit, the Kt: value Obtained from the one field measurement was applied. For the clay-rich zones of the upper till unit, the Kh value applied was ten times greater than the value used for the lower till to account for the effects of weathering (Keller et al., 1986; Cravens and Ruedisili, 1987). For the sand lenses in the upper till unit, the average of their field-measured Kb values was applied. Vertical hydraulic conductivity (K,) values were estimated by assuming certain anisotropies: 1:1 for sand and gravel and 1:10 for clay, silt, and bedrock. The simulated head distribution beneath the study area is shown in Figure 2 and is in general agreement with observed heads. Slight adjustments were made to the recharge rate but the hydraulic conductivities, anisotropies, and recharge/discharge well flow rates were not adjusted. Equipotential data generated from the model indicate that between the land surface 14 and the middle sand unit, ground-water flow direction is predominantly near-vertical and downward. Along the modeled cross section, the sand lenses in the upper till unit have little effect on the ground-water flow direction. The simulated horizontal gradient in the middle sand unit is very small and is in agreement with gradients Obtained from measured water levels in the same unit. The use of a recharge well in the bedrock along the southeastern boundary of the model simulates the observed upward hydraulic gradients between the bedrock and middle sand unit along the southern part of the facility. However, further to the north, equipotential lines indicate mainly downward hydraulic gradients between the middle sand unit and the bedrock and are in agreement with observed heads. The northward decreasing head values simulated by the model are consistent with measured head values. I Since there was some uncertainty as to the composition of the upper till unit in the northern third of the simulated cross section, a sensitivity analysis was performed by treating the composition of that part of the cross section as either all clay, all sand, or a clay/sand mixture with a distribution similar to that beneath the facility. The results indicate that the composition of the upper till unit in the northern part of the cross section has little influence on the hydraulic head distribution beneath the facility (Figure 16). Ground-water velocity (V) can be calculated from the flow model using 15 where i is the simulated hydraulic gradient, K is the hydraulic conductivity, and n is the porosity. The vertical ground-water velocity for the upper till unit is 4.8 x 10'9 m/s when applying a K' of 6.7 x 10'9 m/s, an effective porosity of 0.35 (Hendry, 1988), and an average vertical hydraulic gradient Of 0.25 which was derived from the flow model. SAMPLING METHODS Ground-water samples from 40 monitoring wells were collected by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources field personnel during the second week of October, 1987. These wells, terminating in glacial deposits and bedrock, have, at their bases. screened intervals of 1.5 and 3 m, respectively, and are completely cased down to the tops of these intervals. The elevations and lengths of screened intervals, as well as the geologic units that they draw from, are shown in Figure 5. Before collecting water samples, each well was purged to insure that the sample obtained is representative of water from the screened interval. Samples for tritium analysis were delivered to 1 liter Nalgene plastic bottles, tightly capped, and labeled. In addition, 125 ml plastic bottles were filled with water from six selected wells and shipped to the University of Waterloo Environmental Isotope Laboratory (UWEIL) for 18O and 2H analysis by mass-spectrometry. The accuracy of the analyses is +/— 0.2 o/oo for 18O and +/- 2 o/OO for 2H. The tritium concentration of each sample was first analyzed by direct liquid scintillation counting in the tritium laboratory at Michigan State University (detection limit of approximately 12 TU and counting error of +/-10 TU). Samples which contained more than 12 TU were also analyzed by direct liquid scintillation counting at UWEIL (detection limit of 6 TU and counting error of +/- 8 TU). Samples which 16 2863 -8339. 35. .=: 530. $286 3:: .23 062E -8513. some .=: coma: 5.286 EEO .uoEEmm 2E: u_wo_oom see. .95. 5:; 3:5. .3 83:56 war“; no. EEBE 8528 Lo co_E>o_m .m oSmE A._.w.m.Ev hmmw mmmEMHamw mm Jm>m._ mm.—.<>> 0_._.<._.w no ZO_.F<>m._m ooeg oosvm ooevm oo.mv~ 8.4% g — h _ — — _ _ _ _ F — _ _ ~ _ 00F I . I rooN xooeuom - I I I 88 o I .5 $33 roam . .l romw 0 0 Bow 23:2 o e no no r o 0 room :2. Ban: 00 o W 00 m o o I romm ('I'S'e'w) dO.L 'IVAHBLNI GBNBEHOS :IO NOLLVAHTB 17 contained less than 12 TU were electrolytically enriched in the tritium laboratory at Michigan State University and counted at UWEIL (average detection limit of 1.5 TU and counting error of +/- 1.4 TU). STABLE ISOTOPE RESULTS The stable isotopes 18O and 2H (deuterium) are part of the water molecule and can therefore be used to trace the origin and history of a water mass. The mass differences of the various isotopic forms of water lead to slight differences in their vapor pressures. which in turn are responsible for the isotopic fractionation of water during evaporation and condensation stages of precipitation formation. The degree of fractionation depends on the rate of the reaction and the temperature, and increases with increasing rate of reaction and with decreasing temperature (Dansgaard, 1964). Unless high temperatures are encountered in the subsurface, exchange of 18O with oxygen-bearing minerals can be considered negligible. The isotopic content of precipitation is also influenced by geographic factors in that it becomes increasingly lighter as its parent air mass moves over continental areas and preferentially releases the heavier isotopes. It has been demonstrated by Craig (1961) that most precipitation, excluding that in tropical areas, falls on a meteoric water line which on a global basis is described by dc] 2H = 8 del 18o + 10. Thus, a ground-water sample whose isotopic composition falls on the meteoric line can be used as an indicator of the average isotopic content of precipitation in its respective recharge area. Water samples whose isotopic composition falls off of the meteoric line 18 can be said to have undergone evaporation, reaction with minerals, or mixing with water of non-meteoric origin. Del values, in parts per thousand or mil (o/oo), are used to report the deviation of the isotopic ratios of the sample from those in an international standard. The deviations are calculated using the equation Rsample del sample = ------ Rstandard -1 X1000 where R is the abundance ratio (180/160 and 2H/lH). The standard for reporting del 18O and del 2H is standard mean ocean water (SMOW). The results of the stable isotope analyses from the facility are shown in Table 1. Table 1. Stable isotope data. Sample # Sampled Interval del 18O del 2H Geologic Unit Elevation (masl) Sampled BF-14 244.48 - 242.96 —9.01 -67.2 Upper Till BF-15 238.81 - 237.29 -8.82 -67.0 Middle Sand BF—5 223.94 - 222.41 -8.73 -66.5 Lower Till BF—2 215.95 - 214.43 -8.90 -67.3 Lower Till BF-ll 205.86 - 202.81 -9.14 —67.2 Bedrock BF—10 195.19 - 192.15 -9.25 -67.8 Bedrock The isotopic composition of the four samples taken from drift wells is plotted in Figure 6 and is consistent with a trend observed in other samples taken from drift wells in Michigan (Regalbuto, 1987; Long et al., 1988; Long and Larson, 1988). These samples have been plotted against a meteoric line (del 2H = 7.5 del 18O + 12.6) for the Lake Simcoe, Ontario area which lies approximately 300 km east of the study area 19 —30~ AAAAAGenesee County (this study) ....- tnghom County (Long and Larson, 1988) *H'H' Leelonou County (Regalbuto, 1987) 00000 Bay County (Long et al., 1988) I T I I I I I I 1 -20 —18 —16 -14 —12 —1O —8 -6 del 18 O (o/oo) Figure 6. Stable isotope composition of water sampled from drift wells in Michigan. Solid line- Lake Simcoe meteoric line (Desaulniers et al., 1981). 20 (Desaulniers et al., 1981). The results indicate no significant isotopic trends with depth. Unlike 60 km to the north in Bay County (Long et al., 1988) and 150 km to the east in southwestern Ontario (Desaulniers et al., 1981) where very negative values in thick clay sequences have been used to suggest the presence of water recharged when the climate was cooler during the late Pleistocene and early Holocene, no such extremely negative values have been measured in ground-water samples from the facility. Therefore, the stable isotopic contents of the samples suggest that the ground water beneath the facility was recharged during a climate similar to that of present and during the relatively recent geologic past. TRITIUM RESULTS Large amounts of tritium (H), a radionuclide of hydrogen with a half-life of 12.43 years (Mann et al., 1982), were introduced into the hydrologic cycle from 1953 to 1962 as a result of atmospheric nuclear weapons testing. Prior to 1953, the natural tritium concentration Of precipitation was 3 TU, where 1 TU is equal to 1 tritium atom per 1018 hydrogen atoms (Robertson and Cherry, in press). Post-1953 precipitation is characterized by tritium concentrations which are several orders Of magnitude higher than in pre-1953 precipitation. Therefore, any water which entered the ground prior to 1953 cannot have tritium contents in excess of 0.45 TU. For a review of tritium systematics, refer to Appendix F. The results of the tritium analyses from the facility are shown in Table 2. Any sample whose tritium concentration is 0.45 TU above its counting error, expressed in TU, contains "bomb" tritium and can be considered to have recharged after 1953. 21 016606 60061166 6680115 566616 6 10 II- 10 510 66-12 6.66 6.60 66-13 16.61 6.00 66-15 (6 6.66 66-22 6.65 6.00 66-25 (6 6.06 66-21 16.60 6.00 66-26 (6 6.00 66-36 16.61 6.60 66-35 66.16 6.06 66-36 22.31 6.00 66-31 21.61 6.00 66-36 11.63 6.00 66610660 00661166 6656116 66068 666 866666 6 CPI 066 06 09 Is 191 668 066: 10 +/- 10 61-11 116.21 116.56 1.22 1.22 13.15 .66 3.66 551.35 5.65 66-6 3.10 .01 .26 .22 13.66 .66 .60 .35 1.26 66-16 3.65 .62 .26 .21 13.52 .66 .60 .10 1.26 66-16 3.16 .13 .26 .22 12.63 .66 .00 .62 1.22 66-20 6.21 .66 .21 .23 13.16 .66 .02 3.12 1.32 66-21 3.16 .11 .26 .22 13.62 .66 .00 .56 1.32 66-26 3.66 .06 .26 .21 13.65 .66 .60 .31 1.31 66-31 6.63 1.66 .26 .26 12.62 .66 .63 6.56 1.26 66-33 3.60 .21 .26 .22 13.26 .66 .01 1.33 1.26 66-66 6.21 .66 .21 .23 13.56 .66 .62 3.21 1.35 61-12 66.61 61.11 1.10 1.66 16.52 .66 6.60 562.62 6.10 66-3 3.65 .15 .26 .21 12.65 .62 .61 .16 1.26 66-6 3.66 .36 .26 .22 16.66 .63 .01 1.56 1.36 66-6 3.11 .21 .26 .22 13.60 .63 .01 1.16 1.33 66-11 3.56 .06 .25 .21 13.65 .63 .60 .66 1.26 66-16 6.51 1.61 .26 .26 15.16 .63 .06 5.61 1.51 66-23 3.10 .20 .26 .22 15.62 .66 .61 1.16 1.51 66-26 3.11 .21 .26 .22 16.35 .63 .01 1.61 1.36 66-32 3.11 .21 .26 .22 15.20 .66 .01 1.53 1.65 66-36 3.11 .21 .26 .22 16.26 '.63 .61 1.16 1.31 66-61 6.11 1.21 .26 .26 15.36 .66 .65 6.62 1.56 61-13 66.13 65.23 1.12 1.11 15.36 .62 3.66 556.22 6.66 66-1 3.11 .21 .26 .22 15.62 .62 .01 1.66 1.55 66-2 3.11 .21 .26 .22 16.56 .62 .61 1.51 1.63 66-5 6.65 1.15 .26 .26 15.16 .62 .05 6.65 1.61 66-1 3.16 .20 .26 .22 13.16 .62 .01 1.65 1.36 66-16 3.11 .21 .26 .22 15.11 .62 .01 1.22 1.61 66-11 3.12 .22 .26 .22 13.36 .61 .61 1.16 1.32 66-26 3.63 .13 .25 .21 16.61 .63 .61 .61 1.51 66-36 6.21 .11 .21 .23 13.65 .61 .03 6.02 1.36 66-62 6.36 .66 .21 .23 12.11 .61 .03 6.36 1.36 Table 2. Tritium data. 22 A plot of tritium concentration versus depth indicates that, with the exception of three samples from depths of 15, 26, and 45 m, bomb tritium has not penetrated deeper than 4 to 8 m below the ground surface and is therefore confined to the upper till unit (Figure 7). However, within the upper till unit, the concentration of tritium at any particular depth is not the Same and indicates that tritium is not moving downward along a front. For example, a plot of the lateral distribution Of tritium within the sand lenses of the upper till unit shows that in the central part Of the study area, where water level readings suggest that the sand lenses may be interconnected, tritium is not evenly distributed (Figure 17). Pre-bomb or bomb tritium is also probably present in the middle sand unit at a depth of 17.5 In, in the lower till unit at a depth of 33 In, and in the bedrock at a depth of 55 at. These seemingly anomalous values could be attributed to fracture flow, leakage down the annular space of the casing, or analytical error. DISCUSSION In order to evaluate the effect of hydrodynamic dispersion (D) on the movement Of bomb tritium through the upper till unit at the BFLIF, mathematical simulations were generated which take into account advection, dispersion, and diffusion. Implicit in these simulations is the assumption that ground-water flow through the upper till unit is vertical and downward. This is supported by the flow model already discussed. The middle sand, lower till, and bedrock were not included in the simulations because flow velocities and directions in those units are different from those in the upper till. The simulations are based on a computer code (Javandel et al., 1984) that generates analytical solutions to the following one-dimensional solute transport equation: dZC de dC D ........ - ---..-- - LC = dxz dx dt D = av + D. where x is the vertical and downward distance of travel over time t, v is the average linear ground-water velocity in the x direction, C is the concentration of tritium (solute), L is the radioactive decay constant for tritium, and a and D. are the coefficients of dispersivity of the aquifer material and effective molecular diffusion for tritium in the saturated porous medium, respectively. The method of superposition (Egboka et al., 1983) was applied to the simulations to account for the temporal variability of bomb tritium entering the till over a period of 34 years. The tritium input function used was generated from the tritium concentration in recharging precipitation for Chicago, Illinois (IAEA, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1973, 1975, 1979, 1983, 1986). Figure 7 shows the simulated and actual tritium concentrations for the upper till unit at the facility. The simulations were obtained by applying dispersivity values of 0.025, 0.25, and 2.5 m while maintaining a constant value of 2.1 x 10'9 m/s for velocity as calculated from laboratory permeability values for the till and vertical hydraulic gradients from the flow model. The radioactive decay constant value is 0.000153. A value of 5 x 10'11 mzls was used for the difl‘usion coefficient and is based on reported values for diffusion of conservative solutes in clayey materials (Freeze and Cherry, 1979; Grisak et al., 1980; Gillham et al., 1984). The results Of the simulations indicate that no single dispersivity value for the upper 24 0 30 60 90 120 O I 1 “1 I I 1 I I l I I l 1 \ \ \ 2 ‘~ 1 "l 1 \ t \ D ‘1 I 2 D .‘ ,’ —I '6 I ' A I, l”’ E '. o ’7'" 3“ I," v ./BB ”l I ,’ 1'— ], ,' a 0.. 4 I ,1 LIJ , r’ C) ,I o c f, 5 : . l,’ ‘6 '. ,I' ..... ENRICHED 9.5 +/- 1.4 TU) 6 '6 count: UNENRICHE (6 +/- 8 TD) , . ’6 O a 0.025 m I -- - a a 0.25 In '3. ..... (I E 265 m 7 -" I Figure 7. Simulated and observed tritium values in the upper till unit at the facility. 25 till unit can adequately account for the distribution of tritium. For example, when applying a dispersivity of 2.5 m, few measured concentrations correspond to predicted concentrations and most are significantly greater or less than predicted. Likewise, when a dispersivity of 0.25 In is applied, most measured concentrations are significantly greater or less than predicted. The simulation generated using a dispersivity value of 0.025 III also does not explain all the tritium data in Figure 7, but it does explain the presence of non-tritiated water at a depth of 3.8 m, especially since the solute transport model assumes matrix flow. The presence of tritiated water below depths predicted can likewise be explained by fracture flow. Such a system has been presented by Williams and Farvolden (1969), Grisak and Cherry (1975) and Hendry (1983a). Also, Grisak and Pickens (1980) have mathematically simulated solute transport in such a system and have demonstrated that diffusive transport is usually dominant in the unfractured matrix of till and advective- dispersive transport is dominant in the fractures. Although a one-dimensional solute transport model like the one applied in this study does not directly account for fracture flow, its application is justified by its usefulness as a preliminary indicator of the presence of a non-matrix flow system and by the minimum amount of data required. However, to accurately simulate the movement of solutes through deposits such as fractured tills, especially if tills are to be considered for containment of hazardous or low-level radioactive waste, solute transport models like the one developed by Grisak and Pickens (1980) should be applied. Such models normally require information about fracture aperture, spacing, and flow velocity, as well as diffusion and distribution coefficients, and porosity for the matrix material. It is 26 probable, however, that the acquisition of such information would be considerably less difficult than the callhration Of such models against field data. CONCLUSION The concentration of tritium in 40 ground-water samples collected from two till units and underlying bedrock in southeastern Michigan was found to range from 0 to 44 TU. Bomb tritium was identified in samples at depths of 1.5 to 42 m below the water table while pre-bomb tritium was identified in samples from depths of 5.0 to 54 m. The distribution of tritium in the ground-water reservoir of the upper till unit was simulated using a one-dimensional solute transport model which assumes matrix flow. Based on the shallowest occurrence of non-tritiated water, the dispersivity value of the matrix flow system in the upper till unit was found be less than 0.025 In. Bomb tritium penetration to depths beyond those predicted by the model is explained by the presence of a fracture flow system in the tills. The results of this study demonstrate that the tritium distribution observed in Michigan tills is similar to that observed in tills in the Great Plains region and that further study Of these deposits is required if they are to be used for containment of low- level radioactive or hazardous waste. APPENDICES APPENDIX A REGIONAL GEOLOGIC ANALYSIS More than 70 bedrock water well records within a 3.5 km radius of the study area were examined to define regional trends in the bedrock surface, bedrock potentiometric surface, drift thickness, bedrock surface composition, and height of potentiometric surface above bedrock surface. Local bedrock was found to lie between 200 and 220 m in elevation and contain . slopes of 12 to 20 m per km. However, no regional trends in bedrock surface are observed (Figure 8). Approximately 60% of the wells indicate shale as the uppermost bedrock unit while the remaining 40% of the wells encountered sandstone as the uppermost bedrock formation (Figure 9). Although sandstone is encountered more toward the eastern and southeastern parts of the study area, it would be speculative to draw a contact based on this data because the Paleozoic formations are rather variable in their composition and irregular bedrock topography could explain some of the apparent lateral variability. The possibility Of a contact in this area, however, should not be ruled out completely because regional maps indicate that a Saginaw-Marshall contact runs beneath southeastern Gaines Township. Apparently, the Michigan Formation is not represented in this area. 27 28 Local drift thickness ranges from more than 50 m in the southwest to less than 30 m in the northeast (Figure 10). Although drift thickness is largely a function of bedrock topography when dealing with a planar ground surface, a gradual increase in ground surface elevation to the south appears to account for the increasing drift thickness in that direction. The local drift consists predominantly of clay with subequal amounts Of silt, sand, and gravel. Most well records indicate the presence Of 3 to 5 m of brown clay at the surface underlain by thick gray clay with occasional sand and gravel lenses. The brown and gray clay probably represent zones of oxidized and unoxidized material, repsectively (Williams and Farvolden, 1969; Grisak et al., 1976; Desaulniers et al., 1981; Hendry, 1982; Keller et al., 1986; Cravens and Ruedisili, 1987). A north-south oriented surface water divide, located approximately 2 km southwest of the study area, separates the Flint River drainage basin to the east from the Shiawassee River drainage basin to the west. Locally, Kimball Drain removes any water east of the divide and Cargill Creek drains areas west of the divide. Drainage in the area is improved through extensive use of tile fields and drains. Local ground water supplies include thin, shallow (10-20 In deep) sand and gravel layers within the thick clay sequences. These sand and gravel bodies may be related to the middle sand unit in the study area. These aquifers are typically confined and produce less than 10'3 m3/s. The Saginaw Formation is the principal aquifer in the bedrock, producing water from fractured interbedded shale-sandstone sequences at the bedrock surface. The confined conditions of the Saginaw are attested to by the level Of the water above bedrock surface which ranges from 50 m in the south to less than 30 m 29 in the north (Figure 11). The bedrock potentiometric surface slopes to the north with a horizontal hydraulic gradient of 0.005 (Figure 12). Figure 8. Regional bedrock surface contour map (contour interval ===== 31 . 3 o 0.0 0 o c O . o o o co 0 o 0 c 0. 0.51m 41‘ 9 0° 0 o o ’ e O l- . ’ o o o o . o o O O 00 . O o . O O O '0 O 4 4 e e 0 c Figure 9. Regional bedrock surface lithology map (filled Circles- shale, open circles- sandstone). Study area Figure 12. Regional bedrock potentiometric surface map (contour interval = 2 m). APPENDIX B CROSS SECTIONS THROUGH THE STUDY AREA 35 36 53.53 can chew a. 5.5m on. o. cone—2 E 8289. 3.08 Lo .5330. can BEES £03 mo c0330. 9:30;» 32 .2 oSwE _ mam — q a SOON cow 0 e at; m mun \ .mo o8 _ o a. z“ .< 1111 9... :o On a. one A... o 7 one \ v ELEVATION (m.a.s.l.) 1> -SO27 250* SB 26 245‘ 240* 235T 230q 225J WW $826 \ Figure 14. Cross sections A-A’ and B-B’. ~8855 37 B Upper Till 5 Middle Sand Lower Till E] Till sand/gravei O 100 m L._.___.J Sand/gravel 252 - 250-! 3 2484 g 242- ELEVATION (ma to £1 250- 2457 240— .s.l.) a ? ELEVATION (m. N N