l. 2.. n. ..... a. Z n . .5: .2 a.- . .13, 155.3“, m I? 13 684M“! 8 I MICHIGAN ST’ATE UIVN I II IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 31293I 00570 9047 LIBRARY Michigan State University This is to certify that the thesis entitled Synthesis and Hydrolysis Studies of APS Modified Imogolite presented by Leighta Maureen Johnson has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for Mdegree in Chemistry Q¢QH8142?:222i:?2¢ayzbcauv #rofessor Date—MIME.— O—7639 MS U is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Institution PLACE ll RETURN BOX to move this checkout from your mood. TO AVOID FINES mun on or bdoro 6‘. duo. DATE DUE DATE DUE DATE DUE MSU Is An Affirmative Action/Equal Opponunlty Institution SYNTHESIS AND HYDROLYSIS STUDIES OF APS MODIFIED IMOGOLITE BY Leighta Maureen Johnson A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Chemistry 1988 00544—1 ABSTRACT SYNTHESIS AND HYDROLYSIS STUDIES OF APS MODIFIED IMOGOLITE by Leighta Maureen Johnson The silylation of the tubular aluminosilicate imogolite, was undertaken in an attempt to synthesize a new phase transfer catalyst. The Al-OH outer surface of imogolite may be rendered more hydrophobic through treatment with the organosilane gamma-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APS). The solubility properties of the tubular particles are modified without altering their desirable characteristics, such as a large surface area and the capability of accommodating small ions in the inner cavity of the tube. Synthesis of APS modified imogolite was accomplished, but the material was found to be unstable toward hydrolysis. A time dependent dialysis experiment was conducted to compare the rate of hydrolysis of APS from the surface of imogolite with that of the hydrolysis rate from gamma-alumina, an amorphous material possessing planar surface Al-OH sites. The results showed that APS modified imogolite was more stable toward hydrolysis than APS modified gamma-alumina. Future work will utilize surfactants for the surface modification of imogolite. To my family and Phil ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am deeply grateful for the guidance and support of Dr. T.J. Pinnavaia in the pursuance of this work. Through his insightful direction, he shaped the results that were obtained and helped me to follow the path that became the focus of this thesis. May he continue to broaden my perspective in science throughout work on my dissertation. In addition to his contagious optimism and invaluable insight, the financial support which he was able to provide was greatly appreciated. My fiance, Philip Lyman, who has endured untold hardships as a result of my decision to undertake this endeavor, has nonetheless assisted me unfailingly in the technical aspects of developing this thesis into its final form. In addition to his technical assistance, I would like to express my sincere gratitude for his support and undying faith in me. Tribute must also be given to Dr. Ahmad Moini. Through his efforts, many potential crises were thwarted and many seemingly unsolvable problems were surmounted. I would like to express my thanks for those efforts and for the many words of wisdom that enabled me to successfully "deal with" the situations at hand. iii I would also like to thank my friends and family for their patience and encouragement. The Chemistry department staff, especially Kermit Johnson for his assistance with the NMR and the library personnel, are greatly appreciated for their efforts. iv LIST OF LIST OF Chapter Chapter A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. Chapter E. F. Table of Contents TABLES FIGURES 1 Introduction Research Objectives Imogolite Coupling Agents 2 Experimental Methods Imogolite Synthesis APS-imogolite Synthesis APS-alumina Synthesis Sodium Lauryl Sulfate-imogolite Synthesis Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy MAS 2951 NMR Time Dependent Dialysis Experiment Elemental Analysis 3 Results and Discussion Imogolite Synthesis Characterization of Imogolite APS-imogolite Synthesis Characterization of APS-imogolite Time Dependent Dialysis Experiment Conclusions Page vii viii 14 22 23 23 24 24 25 25 26 27 28 31 33 52 64 Chapter 4 Future Studies Imogolite Synthesis APS-imogolite Synthesis SLS-imogolite Synthesis and Catalysis Analytical Techniques vi 65 66 66 67 LIST OF TABLES Iéhls Page 1 IR active vibrations and their frequencies 36 2 Si-O-Si stretching frequency vs. APS concentration 45 vii Figure 10 LIST OF FIGURES Structure of Imogolite (a) Mode in which the orthosilicate group is attached to the face of a gibbsite sheet. (b) Cross sectional view of the imogolite structure. Sequence of events leading to a coupling reaction. IR spectra of a) Dialyzed imogolite. b) Non-dialyzed imogolite. IR spectra of a) Air-dried APS. b) Air-dried imogolite. IR spectra of APS-imogolite samples containing the following APS to A1 mole ratios: a) 0.5 to 1.0 b) 1.0 to 1.0. IR spectra of APS-imogolite samples containing the following APS to Al mole ratios: a) 2.0 to 1.0 b) 2.5 to 1.0. IR spectra resulting from the subtraction of a pure imogolite spectrum from the spectra in figure 5. APS to Al mole ratios a) 0.5 to 1.0 b) 1.0 to 1.0. IR spectra resulting from the subtraction of a pure imogolite spectrum from the spectra in figure 6. APS to Al mole ratios a) 2.0 to 1.0 b) 2.5 to 1.0. 2951 MAS NMR of a) Air-dried dialyzed imogolite and b) Air-dried APS, with chemical shifts reported with respect to TMS. Structural models illustrating the molecular bonding at the silane/silica3interface. a) Q site b) Q site c) Q site. viii 16 30 35 41 42 43 44 48 49 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 29Si MAS NMR of air-dried APS-imogolite with mole ratio 0.5APS to 1.0A1. IR Spectra of a) Gamma-alumina b) air-dried imogolite. IR spectra of initial Time Dependent Dialysis Experiment samples, 1.0 to 1.0 mole ratio APS to A1, a) APS-alumina b) APS-imogolite. IR spectra of Time Dependent Dialysis Experiment samples after twelve hours, a) APS-alumina b) APS-imogolite. IR spectra of Time Dependent Dialysis Experiment samples after fifty hours, a) APS-alumina b) APS-Imogolite. Plot of percent APS versus dialysis time. Plot of the log(%APS) versus dialysis time. ix 53 55 56 58 59 61 Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION A. Research Objectives The family of aluminosilicate minerals is comprised of a wide variety of structurally dissimilar materials. A three dimensional porous network system is adopted in zeolites. Clay minerals generally take the form of layered compounds containing accessible space between the layers. Halloysite is composed of a single sheet which has been wound into a roll. Hollow spherical particles constitute the structure of allophane. Imogolite, as a member of this diverse group also possesses its own fundamental features. Its structure is that of a hollow tube. The outer surface of imogolite consists of an aluminum hydroxide layer and silanols are exposed on the inner surface. These unique structural characteristics give rise to the particular behavior exhibited by imogolite in solution. The multitude of surface hydroxyls provide a wealth of potential reactive sites. These hydroxyls also give imogolite a small but significant cation exchange capacity (CEC). Because of the nature of the CEC, its magnitude varies with the type of cation and the pH of the solution. The tubular structure is also responsible for imogolite’s unusually high surface area. 1 The combination of its shape, CEC, accessible cavity within the tube, high surface area and water solubility characteristics make imogolite an attractive candidate for applications in catalysis and other areas of materials chemistry. The purpose of the present investigation is both to improve the reliability of the synthesis of imogolite and to modify the surface of imogolite. Surface modification of these inorganic tubes may prove to be useful in various catalytic applications. Toward this end, the first goal is to find a way to render the surface hydrophobic. This was to be accomplished by attaching long chain hydrocarbon moieties to the outside surface of the tubes through the use of organosilane coupling agents. In this way, an inorganic compound could be made to behave very much like an organic compound. The imogolite would subsequently be extractable by organic solvents. If the functionalized imogolite retains a significant affinity for water on its inner surfaces, a phase transfer catalyst with very unique activity in an organic-aqueous system would be expected. The long chain organic functionalities will be too large to fit into the cavity and thus interact with the silanols on the inside of the tubes. Therefore the inner surface of the tube can be used to adsorb small organic or inorganic cations, making the imogolite a sort of "ion shuttle" between the organic and inorganic phases of a phase transfer system. Imogolite also has an extensive surface area on which a reaction may occur. This leads to another possible application for the successfully surface modified tubes. Chelating agents coupled to reactive silane functionalities are readily available. Affixing compounds of this nature to the imogolite surface would allow metal cations to be complexed by the Chelating functionality. A system complexed with a specific metal may be useful catalytically, or the system may be used to concentrate metal ions from solutions for subsequent quantitative analysis of their composition. In order to synthesize functionalized imogolite, a reproducible synthesis and suitable purification techniques must be found. To accomplish this, concentration and pH limits were explored, and purification techniques were developed. Thus, a method for reliably obtaining well dispersed, well-formed imogolite tubes was documented. Surface modification efforts centered around the coupling agent gamma-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APS). APS was chosen because of the large quantity of information available documenting its reactivity and application to a wide variety of surfaces. It is also readily hydrolyzable and well behaved in solution. Developing an understanding of this system would provide the groundwork necessary for the pursuit of more poorly understood coupling agents that might impart the desired characteristics to imogolite for use in the aforementioned applications. Preliminary experiments to achieve coupling of APS to imogolite proved inconclusive. Through further study, it was determined that under the silylation conditions utilized, bonding is achieved between APS and imogolite. It was also found that the Si-O-Al bond is hydrolytically unstable. In fact, all of the coupling agent can be removed from imogolite by dialyzing the solution for two to three days. Although this discovery was a temporary setback to the goal of surface modification, it also revealed a way in which the relative stabilities of the Si-O-Al bond could be compared in different systems. A time dependent dialysis experiment was conducted to compare the stability of APS on imogolite with that of APS on alumina. The relative stabilities of the two systems were easily determined from the data collected in this experiment. Further efforts continue to focus on the modification of the imogolite surface in a less reversible manner. Preliminary success has resulted from the treatment of imogolite with the surfactant sodium lauryl sulfate. Future studies will be directed toward understanding and controlling the interaction between imogolite and sodium lauryl sulfate and the behavior of this new system. B. Imogolite The empirical formula for the tubular aluminosilicate imogolite is (HO)3A1203SiOH. The formula is written so that it corresponds to the ordering of atoms along a path from the outside to the inside of the tube. The inner wall of the tube is made up of orthosilicate units which have been condensed to one side of a single gibbsite sheet which defines the outer wall. (See figure 1).1 The strain introduced by the coupling of tetrahedrally coordinated silicate units to the octahedrally coordinated aluminum hydroxide sheet gives rise to curvature, allowing the edges to be conjoined, resulting in tube formation. Evidence for the strain is provided by the shortening of the O-O distance around the vacant site in the gibbsite sheet to which the SiO4 tetrahedron is condensed. This shortening of oxygen contacts reduces the repeat distance along the tube to 8.4A compared with the gibbsite repeat distance of 8.6A. Electron diffraction patterns of non-oriented tube samples give reflections at 1.4, 2.1, 2.3 (broad), 3.3 (broad), 3.7, 4.1, 5.7 (broad), 7.8 (broad), 11.8 (broad) and 21-23A.2 The 11.8, 7.8 and 5.7A reflections indicate the 8.4A repeat unit along the tube unit axis. The 4.1, 3.7, 3.3, 3.1 and 2.3A reflections arise from the lateral arrangement of the tube unit with interaxial separations of 21 to 23A.3 Other supporting evidence for this structure include transmission electron microscopy, which shows the tubular morphology, infrared spectroscopy, which indicates the presence of 1 1 orthosilicate units (peaks at 930cm- and 995cm- ), x-ray diffraction patterns, which corroborate the electron Ibl Gfibbsito 2 imogolite 217/0 e- ."1 r 1r : 02 I (0102’! 0 C "3’ I I e g e . e g e I..- .. . -_..I .JL 0 ' SI 00 AI 00 O .0 on Figure 1 Structure of Imogolite (a) Mode in which the orthosilicate group is attached to the face of a gibbsite sheet. (b) Cross sectional view of the imogolite structure. diffraction patterns, and thermal analysis, which shows the loss of water associated with the tubes. Natural imogolite can be found as a component of weathered volcanic ash and pumice beds. It was first identified in soil samples of this type by Yoshinaga and Aomine4 in 1962. Structural determination was slow because of difficulties encountered in the separation of imogolite from the spherically shaped, amorphous aluminosilicate allophane, with which it is found. An unequivocal structure of imogolite was presented in 1972 by Cradwick3 et a1. using electron and x-ray diffraction data. In addition, a chemical procedure for differentiating between silicate anions of different degrees of polymerization was applied to imogolite. This procedure involves converting the silicate anion present in the sample to its corresponding trimethylsilyl ether and 5’6 For identifying the ether or ethers by gas chromatography. imogolite, it was found that 95% of the silicate anions are derived from orthosilicate units and only 5% are from pyrosilicate units. The ratio of ortho to pyrosilicate obtained for imogolite was higher than that obtained for other orthosilicates by this method. These results required that the structure of imogolite contain only orthosilicate units. The chain structure proposed by Wada and Yoshinaga2 in 1969 was no longer acceptable because of its 2.80A repeat distance and the fact that it contained linked SiO 4 tetrahedra. Once the structure of imogolite was known, a synthetic route to its synthesis could be sought. The preparation of 7 et al. in 1977. Imogolite imogolite was described by Farmer was synthesized through the growth of a proto-imogolite structure, made by the reaction of orthosilicic acid and hydroxyaluminium ions in aqueous solution. Once the product imogolite begins to form, a decrease in pH is observed. This is believed to be due to the release of H+ during imogolite formation according to the following scheme:8 Si St on I ass/'2 \. /' x a"\ 49 A1 + , Al 4 A1 A . a é \on2 uzo’ ‘ \ If 1‘ When the proper conditions have not been met, nucleation and growth is inhibited and the pH of the solution either stays the same or increases slightly. A comparison of synthetic and natural imogolite reveals some fundamental differences. Natural imogolite has an outer diameter of 20A, whereas the outer diameter of synthetic imogolite is 23A. The internal diameter is 9-11A. This requires that natural imogolite form tubes with 12 gibbsite unit cells and synthetic imogolite form tubes with 14 units. The lengths of the tubes vary from hundreds of angstroms to several microns in both natural and synthetic materialsg. Natural imogolite gives several higher order reflections that are unobtainable in electron diffraction patterns of the' synthetic material. This is due to the fact that naturally formed tubes tend toward more regular packing in the solid state than the synthetic imogolite, which arrange themselves in a more disordered fashion. Natural and synthetic imogolite, being formed in aqueous solution, have very distinct colloid behavior depending upon the pH and imogolite concentration. At very low concentrations, 30mM Al or less, in acidic aqueous solution imogolite is completely soluble and forms a crystal clear solution. At a pH of about 7, aggregation of the tubes begins, turning the solution slightly cloudy. As the pH continues to increase, gelation begins. This behavior can be attributed to the change in surface charge on the imogolite tubes with changing pH. Below pH 5.5 the surface aluminum hydroxides are all protonated, according to a study by Inoue 1° The study was based on the premise that the and Wada. titration of imogolite gave a near neutral reaction at the equivalence point. The like charged tubes remain separated by their electrostatic repulsions. Above pH 8 the surface aluminum hydroxides are completely deprotonated and the inner silicon hydroxide sites begin to deprotonate. In the absence of electrostatic repulsions, the tubes are able to interact and therefore flocculation begins. Aggregation of the tubes begins to occur at pH 7, so the aggregation process itself can be expected to interfere with the ability to determine the state of ionization on the surface at these pH values. 10 Electrophoretic mobility measurements on imogolite were 11 These measurements measured in 0.001M NaCl by Horikawa. determine that the pH at which the surface of imogolite becomes neutral is about 9. It is best to view the results involving basic solutions as guidelines to flocculation behavior, rather than absolute descriptions of the imogolite surface charge. The other factor influencing the degree of aggregation is imogolite concentration. Imogolite suspensions corresponding to aluminum concentrations greater than 30mM, will begin to flocculate, even in acidic solution. As more and more water is removed from the solution, a gel begins to form. Aggregation of imogolite particles by either means (by pH or by concentration variation) is never completely reversible. Aggregated tubes may be partially redispersed by sonification in acidic aqueous solution. The most effective redispersion is achieved when freeze dried imogolite is used. Even then, a cloudy mixture is obtained. In addition to the unique solution and flocculation behavior of imogolite, its tubular nature lends itself to several distinct physical properties. One of these is microporosity. Microporosity was first invoked to explain the discrepancy in density measurements between two methods used by Wade and Yoshinaga.2 One set of density measurements on imogolite was collected with a pycnometer using water as the displacement liquid. A secOnd data set was obtained using a float-sink test involving incremental addition of 11 acetylene tetrabromide (CZH Br4) to a sample. The results 2 from the liquid displacement method gave values of 2.53-2.70 g/cm3. Those from the float-sink method gave consistently lower values of 1.70-1.97g/cm3. This discrepancy cannot be explained simply by the fact that water may be adsorbing onto the imogolite surface in the liquid displacement method. The different results are obtained because water molecules can penetrate into the small micropores in imogolite, but the larger CszBr4 molecules cannot. The porosity in imogolite is due to both the spaces inside the tubes and to those formed between the tubes in their solid state packing arrangement. The porosity was estimated at 55% of the total volume of air-dried imogolite. As might be expected from its porous nature, imogolite has been found to have a very large 2 These values were surface area, from 1100-1200m2/g.1 obtained using the EGME (ethylene glycol monoethylether) method, the lower value being a sample dried over P205 in a vacuum, the higher value being an air dried sample. It is believed that drying under vacuum may cause the tubes to collapse, reducing their surface area. The properties of the imogolite surface are determined in part by the presence of hydroxyl groups. The availability of these surface hydroxyls gives rise to surface acidity. This acidity has been measured by observing the color change of Hammett indicators 13 of known pKa adsorbed on the surface. Each indicator pKa is matched with the weight percent of sulfuric acid necessary 12 to establish the pH at its equivalence point for reference. The acidity of imogolite was measured for samples equilibrated in atmospheres at different relative humidities. It was found that under very dry conditions, <5% relative humidity, imogolite is very acidic, corresponding to the acidity of 71% H2804. Below 20% relative humidity its acidity is reduced to that of 2X10-2% HZSO Above 20% 4. relative humidity the acidity is reduced to an equivalent HZSO4 concentration of 8X10-8%. This latter value is comparable to that of gibbsite at any moisture level. A representation of the structure of the acid sites under changes in relative humidity is as follows:13 ./9” '°\.#” 9 m:s‘ \°\T Q + ”:0 O/SK "co/H20 or/ I.“ " ‘—_—H,o o'H’otfmo Al/ Al’ (0') (6') -H,o I —H’I In? G I-D\ OH Ho\ /0 /5'< ’s'\o I0 on o o>Al' ’0 0H: |'