n... . .. '9«~~- "Hug-u". ...,..-..... . > ‘ ’ r r > ‘ . . I A. ‘ . ; ‘ ‘1 ' -' ‘) .‘ . .r l «111111:WT?mm'I will ”/19 0‘! g7 9‘7 31293 00574 4515 LIBRARY Michigan State ”Mum This is to certify that the dissertation entitled BIOCHEMICAL AND MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF GLUCOSE ISOMERASE FROM THERMOANAEROBES presented by Chanyong LEE has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for ph .D . degree in Biochemistry Date October 31, 1989 MS U is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Institution 0-12771 PLACE IN RETURN BOX to remove this checkout from your record. TO AVOID FINES return on or boron one due. DATE DUE DATE DUE DATE DUE ll MSU Is An Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Institution BIOCHEMICAL AND MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF GLUCOSE ISOMERASE FROM THERMOANAEROBES By Chan yong Lee A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Biochemistry 1989 l 4 ~— (00545 ABSTRACT BIOCHEMICAL AND MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF GLUCOSE ISOMERASE FROM THERMOANAEROBES By Chanyon g Lee Biochemical and molecular structural properties of glucose isomerase were investigated in Clostridium thermosulfurogenes and Thermanaerobacter strain 86A. Both organisms produced intracellular thermostable glucose isomerase, and synthesis of the enzyme was induced by xylose. In addition, Thermoanaerobacter produced intracellular glucogenic amylase and B-galactosidase activities constitutively, which were environmentally compatible with glucose isomerase activity (i.e. active at the same pH and temperature). The xylose grown Thermoanaerobacter cells produced these three enzymes simultaneously, and converted starch or lactose directly into a fructose syrup mixture in a single step process. Glucose isomerases were purified to homogeneity from C. thermosulfurogenes and Thermoanaerobacter, and both enzymes displayed very similar physicochemical and enzymatic properties. Long and flat crystals were formed from glucose isomerase purified from C. thermosulfurogenes. The gene (xyIA) encoding therrnostable glucose isomerase of C. thermosulfurogenes was cloned and expressed constitutively in both Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. The recombinant glucose isomerase produced in these mesophilic hosts retained the To My parents, wife, and sons with love iii ACKNOWLEDGMENT I have been extremely fortunate to meet the right people at the right place and time that have made the completion of this dissertation possible. I would like to thank all of those and only a few are named here due to the limited space. I would like to express my sincere appreciation to Professor J. Gregory Zeikus, my scientific advisor, philosophical mentor, and competitive racket ball partner, for his guidance, encouragement, and patience through my graduate school years. I would also like to thank all of the members of my guidance committee, Drs. John Wilson, Arnold Revzin, Robert Hausinger, and Michael Bagdasarian, who taught me molecular genetic techniques, for their advice and invaluable time. I would like to acknowledge the support of my co-workers and scientists who shared techniques, ideas, and friendship; Drs. R. Lamed, S. Lowe, B. Saha, V. Morales, Mr. J. Kemner, S. Mathupala, Y. Lee, W. Wu, M. Meng, and former and all present lab members from the time in Madison, Wisconsin till now. I would like to thank Michigan Biotechnology Institute for providing me with nice facilities, scientific equipment, and financial support. Finally, I am most grateful to my parents, brother, and sister for their dedication and encouragement, and to Eunha, Maximilian, and Edmond who shared the happiness and frustration, and strengthened me with love and smile. I owe this dissertation to all of them, "My Big Family". iv TABLE OF CONTENTS page LIST OF TABLES .................................... iix LIST OF FIGURES .................................... x ABBREVIATIONS ................................... xiii INTRODUCI ION ..................................... 1 CHAPTER 1. LITERATURE REVIEW ...................... 5 Literature Review .............................. 6 References .................................. 27 CHAPTER II. REGULATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF Thermoanaerobacter GLUCOSE ISOMERASE IN RELATIONSHIP TO THERMOSTABLE SACCHARIDASE SYNTHESIS AND DEVELOPMENT OF A SINGLE STEP PROCESS FOR SWEETENER PRODUCTION ........................ 33 Abstract ................................... 34 Introduction ................................. 35 Materials and Methods .......................... 37 Results .................................... 41 Discussion .................................. 59 Literature Cited ............................... 62 CHAPTER III. PURIFICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF THERMOSTABLE GLUCOSE ISOMERASE FROM Clostridium thermosulfurogenes and Thermaanaerabacter ................ 65 Abstract ................................... 66 Introduction ................................. 67 Materials and Methods .......................... 69 Results .................................... 74 Discussion .................................. 95 Literature Cited ............................... 98 CHAPTER IV. CLONING AND EXPRESSION OF THE Clostridium thermosulfurogenes GLUCOSE ISOMERASE GENE IN Escherichia cali and Bacillus subtilis ............................ 102 Abstract ................................... 103 Introduction ................................. 104 Materials and Methods .......................... 106 Results .................................... 114 Discussion .................................. 129 Literature Cited ............................... 132 CHAPTER V. MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF THE XY LOSE (GLUCOSE) ISOMERASE GENE FROM Clostridium thermosulfurogenes. ROLE OF HIS101 IN ENZYMATIC vi CATALYSIS ................................... 135 Abstract ................................... 136 Introduction ................................. 138 Material and Methods ........................... 140 Results and Discussion .......................... 151 References .................................. 177 CHAPTER VI. CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES .......... 180 vii LIST OF TABLES page Chapter I 1. Some properties of glucose isomerase ................ 8 Chapter II 1. Cellular location of saccharidase activities in Thermoanaerobacter strain B6A .................... 42 2. Effect of growth substrate on saccharidase synthesis in Thermoanaerobacter strain B6A ................... 43 3. Effect of reaction conditions on the final monosaccharide product ratio during a starch or lactose conversion process with a Thermanaerobacter enzyme preparation ..... 57 Chapter [H 1. Biochemical properties of glucose isomerase acrivity in crude cell extracts of therrnoanaerobes ................. 75 2. Summary of glucose isomerase purification steps ......... 76 3. Amino acid composition of thermostable glucose isomerase from C. thernwsulfurogenes and Thermoanaerobacter ....... 80 4. Comparison of thermostable glucose isomerase kinetic properties of therrnoanaerobes ..................... 90 5. Effect of metals on activity and thermal stability of EDTA-treated glucose isomerase from C. thermosulfurogenes . . . 93 viii Chapter IV 1. Comparison of glucose/xylose isomerase activities in E. coli xyIA mutant strains carrying the recombinant plasmid pCGI38 .............................. 117 2. Expression of cloned glucose isomerase by recombinant shuttle plasmid pMLGl in E. coli and B. subtilis ......... 118 3. Effect of D-xylose and D-glucose on synthesis of recombinant thennostable glucose isomerase in E. coli and B. subtilis . . . . 119 4. Purification scheme of cloned thermostable glucose isomerase from E. coli and B. subtilis ....................... 126 Chapter V 1. Expression of C. thermosulfurogenes xylA gene by recombinant plasmid in E. coli. ............................. 152 2. Comparison of site-directed mutant glucose isomerase activities in E. coli carrying different alleles of C. thermasulfurogenes xylA gene .................................. 169 3. Effect of diethylpyrocarbonate (DEPC) on glucose isomerase activity of the wild type and site-directed mutant enzymes . . . 171 4. Comparison of kinetic properties of site-directed mutant and wild type xylose isomerases ........ . ............... 172 ix LIST OF FIGURES page Chapter I 1. Schematic illustration of the proposed catalytic mechanism of glucose isomerase ........................... ll 2. Schematic diagram of the three dimensional structure of the active site in Streptomyces rubiginosus xylose isomerase ...... 14 3. Schematic process biochemistry of enzymatic fructose production from starch .................................. 16 Chapter II 1. Effect of glucose addition on glucose isomerase synthesis during xylan fermentation ........................ 45 2. Effect of pH control on saccharidase production during xylose fermentation ................................. 47 3. Comparison of temperature optima for activity (A) and thermostability (B) of glucose isomerase, amylase, and B—galactosidase activities ......................... 50 4. Comparison of pH optima for activity (A) and pH stability (B) of glucose isomerase, amylase, and B—galactosidase activities ......................... 52 5. Single step conversion of starch (A) and lactose (B) into a fructose mixture by a T hermaanaerobacrer enzyme preparation ................................. 55 Chapter III 1. Electrophoretic analysis of glucose isomerases purified from Thermoanaerobacter (A) and C. thermosulfurogenes (B) ..... Comparison of N-tenninal amino acid sequence of purified glucose isomerases ........................... Effect of temperature on glucose isomerase activity ........ Effect of pH on thermostable glucose isomerase activity (A) and stability (B) .............................. Thermostability of EDTA-treated glucose isomerase from C. thernwsulfurogenes in the presence or absence of metal ions .................................. Crystals of glucose isomerase from C. thernwsulfurogenes Chapter IV 1. 2. Indicator plate for thermostable glucose isomerase activity . . . Physical and genetic maps of plasmids pCGIBS and pMLGl, which carry the C. thermosulfurogenes DNA insert expressing thermostable glucose isomerase .................... Comparison of native versus recombinant glucose isomerase thermal stabilities ............................ SDS-PAGE analysis of glucose isomerase activity fractions . . Time course of glucose conversion into fructose using heat-treated glucose isomerase obtained from recombinant B. subtilis ................................. xi 77 83 85 88 .91 108 115 Chapter V Deletion mapping of the xylose isomerase gene (xylA) of C. rhermosulfurogenes ........................ 142 Sequencing strategy for DNA encoding C. thermasulfurogenes glucose isomerase ............................ 144 Synthetic oligonucleotide primers for site-directed mutagenesis ................................ 147 Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequence of C. thermosulfurogenes xyIA gene .................. 153 Comparison of the amino acid sequences of different xylose isomerases ............................ 158 Summary of amino acid sequence homology between different xylose isomerases ............................ 160 Comparison of hydropathy profiles of xylose isomerases from C. thermosulfurogenes, B. subtilis, and S. violaceoniger . . . . 163 SDS-PAGE comparison of xylose isomerases expressed by different alleles of C. thermosulfurogenes xylA gene ...... 167 Plot of relative log of apparent Vmax versus pH for Gln1m mutant and wild type xylose isomerases .......... 174 xii EDTA SDS PAGE MOPS DEPC PEG KDa D.E. O.D. FPLC HPLC ABBREVIATIONS base pair ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis isopropyl-B-D-thiogalactopyranoside 3-[N-morpholino]propanesulfonic acid diethylpyrocarbonate polyethyleneglycol molecular weight kilo-dalton dextrose equivalence optical density fast performance liquid chromatography high pressure liquid chromatography xiii INTRODUCTION Use of microbial enzymes in human life is an ancient art. By experience and empirical methods, it has developed to a highly sophisticated state; wine processing, cheese manufacture, and preparation of fermented oriental food are good examples. Recently, microbial and biochemical science with modern technology has made it possible to develop the enzyme industry at a larger scale. At present, the two major industrial enzymes are saccharidases and proteases which are used in starch processing and detergent manufacturing industries, respectively. Glucose isomerase is the most important commercial saccharidase and it is utilized in conversion of glucose into fructose to produce high fructose corn syrup as a food sweetener. The industrial process for sweetener production requires a glucose isomerase that is stable at high temperature and low pH, and available at low cost. Many studies have been made on glucose isomerase from meSOphilic microbial sources for enzyme production, its physicochemical and enzymatic properties, and three dimensional structure. Essentially, very little is known about the physiological, biochemical, and molecular genetic features of glucose isomerases from thermophilic bacteria that are known to produce intrinsically thermostable and therrnoactive enzymes (e.g., amylase, cellulase, protease, or alcohol dehydrogenase). Therefore, an interest was generated from the concept that certain thermoanaerobes may possess enzymatic features unique for glucose isomerase activity. Furthermore, the molecular mechanism for high thermostability of glucose isomerase remains to be identified and understood. The research presented in this thesis was initiated to understand the biochemical 2 and physiological properties of glucose isomerase from thermoanaerobic bacteria; to investigate the molecular mechanisms that account for enzymatic catalysis and high thermostability of the enzyme in comparison with thennolabile glucose isomerases; and to assess the biotechnological potential of the thermostable glucose isomerase from therrnoanaerobes for novel sweetener production processes. This thesis is composed of six chapters including a literature review, two manuscripts that were submitted for publication in Applied and Environmental Microbiology, a manuscript which was submitted for publication in the Journal of Bacteriology, a paper which was submitted for publication in the Journal of Biological Chemistry, and a final chapter that deals with concluding remarks and direction of future research. The literature review in Chapter 1 describes previous and present knowledge about glucose isomerase in relation to: general biochemical properties, genetic organization, structure-function relationships and the industrial process for fructose production. In addition, the general properties and molecular mechanisms employed by thermophilic enzymes; and, the general biochemical features of other microbial saccharidases that are involved in industrial sweetener production are described. This ‘ chapter provides the rationale for detailed studies on both fundamental and applied aspects of thermophilic glucose isomerase from thermoanaerobic bacteria. Chapter 11, "Regulation and characterization of Thermoanaerobacter glucose isomerase in relation to thermostable saccharidase synthesis and development of a single step process for sweetener production", describes the general physicochemical properties and regulation of glucose isomerase from Thermoanaerobacter strain B6A. 3 Furthermore, these studies represent the first demonstration that a saccharidase mixture produced by a single microorganism can be used to directly process starch or lactose into a fructose sweetener. Chapter III, "Purification and characterization of thermostable glucose isomerase from Clostridium thermosulfurogenes and Thermoanaerobacter", compares the biochemical and physicochemical properties of glucose isomerases purified from two different thermoanaerobic bacteria in detail. The results indicate that these microorganisms produce highly thermophilic glucose isomerases which display very similar enzymatic and physicochemical properties. Crystals were formed from C. thermosulfurogenes glucose isomerase which can be used for future X—ray crystallographic studies to identify the three dimensional structure of this enzyme. These findings advance fundamental understanding of the biochemical properties of thermostable glucose isomerases and of the evolutionary relationship between these two different Species of thermoanaerobic bacteria. Chapter IV, "Cloning and expression of the Clostridium thermosulfurogenes glucose isomerase gene in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis", demonsuates cloning of the gene encoding thermophilic glucose isomerase from C. thermosulfurogenes. This is the first glucose isomerase gene from a thermophilic bacterium that was cloned and over-expressed in E. coli and B. subtilis. This chapter also describes a new screening method for thermostable glucose isomerase, based on a specific assay that detects conversion of ' fructose to glucose on agar plates. The recombinant glucose isomerase expressed in the mesophilic hosts displayed identical physicochemical (i.e., thermophilicity and molecular weight) and enzymatic properties 4 to those of the native enzyme of C. thermosulfurogenes, and this unique feature made it possible to use a simple heat treatment of crude cell extract as one of the most efficient purification steps when the thermophilic glucose isomerase was produced in B. subtilis a mesophilic and food-safe host. Finally, the potential of the recombinant glucose isomerase for industrial application was assessed. Chapter V, "Molecular characterization of the xylose (glucose) isomerase gene from Clostridium thermosulfurogenes: Role of His101 in enzymatic catalysis", determined the nucleotide sequence of C. thermosulfurogenes xylA gene and compared the deduced amino acid sequence with those of other thermostable and thermolabile glucose isomerases. To understand the molecular mechanism of enzymatic catalysis and thennophilicity of the enzyme, several key amino acids were changed by site directed mutagenesis. The experimental results indicated that His101 is the catalytic residue and functions as a base catalyst during glucose (xylose) isomerization; and that cystine disulfide bonds are not used in the protein molecule to achieve enzyme thermostability. In the final chapter the utility of these findings are discussed in relation to future research aimed at understanding structure function relationships of glucose isomerase, and at protein engineering to redesign the molecule in order to 'achieve desired properties (i.e., higher acid stability, turnover number, and substrate specificity). Chapter 1. LITERATURE REVIEW LITERATURE REVIEW A. Glucose Isomerase Xylose isomerase (D-xylose ketol isomerase, EC 5.3.1.5) is an intracellular enzyme that catalyzes the isomerization reaction between D-xylose and D-xylulose during the xylose metabolism in various microorganisms. Because this enzyme can also convert D-glucose to D-fructose, the enzyme is often referred to as glucose isomerase (1). [1] Physiological and Biochemical Properties Production of glucose isomerase has been reported from a large number of bacteria and actinomycetes that can grow on xylose as an energy source. Among these, Streptomyces species have been studied most extensively and used as a source of industrial enzymes (1-5). Production and properties of glucose isomerases from Actinoplanes missouriensis, Bacillus coagulans, Lactobacillus (an anaerobic species), Norcardia, and Arthrobacter species are also well characterized and some of them are used in the sweetener industry (6-9). However, due to the commercial importance of this enzyme, most of the industrial strains used as glucose isomerase producers have not been disclosed or the information available is brief and concentrated in the patent literature. The regulation of glucose isomerase synthesis and the final yield of enzyme depends on the selected microorganism and its chosen growth conditions (i.e. temperature, pH, mineral salts, and nutrients) (9). Most microorganisms require xylose to induce glucose isomerase production and enzyme synthesis is catabolite 7 repressed by the presence of glucose in the fermentation medium. However, because of the relatively high cost of xylose in industrial fermentation processes, isolation of constitutive mutants have been attempted and culture conditions which allow glucose isomerase production on cheaper xylan or hemicellulose substrates have been investigated (11,12). Most glucose isomerase producing organisms characterized are mesophiles except for reports on two aerobic, moderate thermophilic, Bacillus stearothermophilus and B. coagulans (2,90). Therefore, by further screening. of thermophilic organisms more thermostable glucose isomerases may be identified. In the last few years many new species of extremely thermophilic bacteria, predominately anaerobic species have been isolated (65). General biochemical properties of glucose isomerase from representative microbial sources are summarized in Table 1. Although numerous glucose isomerases have been characterized for their enzymatic properties, very few of them have been purified to homogeneity. Most purified glucose isomerases have molecular weights ranging from 80,000 to 190,000 and are composed of 2 or 4 identical subunits (10,13). The pH optima for different glucose isomerases reported lie in the range of 6.5 to 9.5 (10). Temperature optima for enzyme activity and stability vary greatly depending on the source of glucose isomerase. Glucose isomerase is a metalloenzyme, and it requires a divalent cation such as Mn“, Co”, or Mg++ for both catalytic activity and enzyme stability. Su'uctural and catalytic roles of metal ions have been proposed for enzymatic activity of various glucose isomerases (14-16). The reaction catalyzed by glucose isomerase follows Michelis-Menten kinetic mechanism over a wide range of substrate concentrations. This enzyme Table 1. Some PrOpcrties of Glucose Isomerase Temp. pH Metal Ion Molecular No. Reference Microorganism Optimum Optimum Requirement Weight of C C) Sub- .. units Escherichia coli 45 6.0 -- 96.000 2 23,91 Bacillus subtilis ~50 7.5 --- --- -- This study Lacrobacillus brevis 50 6.0-7.0 Mn“,Co” 195,000 --- 15 Arthrobacter strain B3728 =80 8.0 Mg“ 180,000 4 29 Ampullariella Sp. strain 3876 ~75 170.000 4 V 28 Streptomyces violaceoniger >70 7.5 Mg“ 160.000 4 26 Streptomyces Strain YT-S 8O 8.0-8.5 Mg“,Co“ 157,000 4 l Streptomyces olivochromogenes 80 8.0-10.0 Mg”,Co“ 120.000 2 2,37 Streptomyces flavogriseus 70 7.5 Mg“,Co°‘ 171.000 4 12 Strcptomyces griseofuscus 85 8.5 Mg”,Co” 180.000 4 93,94 Streptomyces violaceruber 80 7.5-9.5 Mg“,Co“ --- ——- 5 Bacillus coagulans 75 7.0 Co“ 160.000 4 9O Bacillus stearothermopillus 80 7.5-8.0 Co“ 130.000 --— 2 Actinoplanes missouriensis 90 7.0-7.5 Mg“,Co“ 80,000 2 6.38.92 9 displays a lower Km and higher V“ for xylose than for glucose indicating that the physiological function for this enzyme is in xylose isomerization. The concentration that between D-glucose and D—fructose is about 50:50 at 60°C. The equilibrium ratio is more favorable towards fructose at temperatures higher than 60°C (13). [2] Genetic organization and Primary Structure of xylA gene In spite of the industrial importance of the enzyme, few glucose isomerase genes have been cloned and characterized for their primary structure and genetic organization. Regulation of xylose catabolism in Salmonella typhimurium and E. coli involves an operon consisting of three structural genes; xyfI‘, xle, xylA, responsible for xylose transport, xylulose kinase, and xylose isomerase, respectively (17-19). Expression of these structural genes are under the positive control of a regulatory gene, xle. The structural gene coding for xylose isomerase from E. coli and B. subtilis have been cloned and sequenced (20,21); and, a comparison of their nucleotide sequence showed about 50% homology (22). Overexpression of E. “coli xylose isomerase by using tac or lac promoters in E. coli strains has been reported (23-25). The glucose isomerase gene of Streptomyces violaceoniger and Ampullariella species has been cloned in a Streptomyces host and in E. coli, respectively, and their deduced amino acid sequences have been reported (26-28). Although nucleotide sequences are not available, the amino acid sequences of Arthrobacter species have been published (29). 10 [3] Catalytic Mechanism and Three Dimensional Structure The proposed catalytic mechanism for glucose isomerization involves formation of a cis—enediol intermediate via an intramolecular hydrogen transfer without proton exchange with water (30,31). A schematic diagram of the proposed mechanism is illustrated in Figure 1 (32). In the first step a base group of the enzyme initiates ring opening of the a-pyranose form of glucose which is known to be the preferred substrate to the B—anomer (33,34). This process may be assisted by a neighboring acidic group. In the second step, another basic group in the active site abstracts the proton from the Q atom of the substrate to facilitate the formation of a cis-enediol intermediate. In the final step, the proton is transferred back to the Cl atom of the substrate , and the first base and acidic groups again cooperate in the ring closing of the intermediate to form the furanose product. Although the exact amino acid residues which take part in catalysis at the active site are not proven, inhibition studies on Streptomyces glucose isomerase activity by chemical modification suggested the involvement of a histidine residue for catalytic activity of the enzyme (35). The three dimensional structure of xylose isomerases have been derived from general enzyme sources including Streptomyces rubiginosus, S. olivochromogenes, Actinoplanes missouriensis, S. violaceoniger, S. albus, and Arthrobacter by X-ray crystallographic studies at different range of resolutions (3639,29). Structure analysis of S. rubiginosus enzyme crystals at 4A resolution indicated that the polypeptide chain consists of two structural domains containing an eight stranded B-sheet and Ot-helix configuration for the larger domain and a loop structure for the smaller domain which overlaps with a larger domain in another subunit to form a tightly bound enzyme 11 Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the proposed catalytic mechanism of glucose isomerase (32). 12 I O l3 dimer. The final tetrameric structure of native enzyme consists of two such dimers (36). Recent determination of the fine three dimensional structure of this enzyme complex with substrate (xylose) or designed-inactivator at 1.9A (40) suggested specific amino acid residues for the putative active site and metal ion binding site (Figure 2). The histidine residue at position 54 was suggested as the catalytic residue and base catalyst, and this histidine is correctly placed to abstract a proton from the C1 or Q atom of the subsu'ate. The predicted structure of the active site in Arthrobacter xylose isomerase also indicated that the histidine residue at the same position 54 of the enzyme may be the catalytic residue (29). However, no biological or functional evidence for the proposed mechanism has been established nor have site directed mutants been used to provide proof that a specific histidine is involved in catalysis. [4] Industrial applications Currently, glucose isomerase is one of the most important industrial enzymes used in the food industry, as it is employed to convert glucose to fructose for the production of high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) as a nutritive sweetener (41). In 1982, more than 200 tons of glucose isomerase were used in the sweetener business ' and 8 billion pounds of HFCS were produced in the United States alone (42). The overall process for HFCS production starts with starch processing steps, including liquefaction and saccharification, and ends with the isomerization step (43) (Figure 3). In the first stage, (rt-amylase converts raw starch into malto dexuin (DE. 1015) by catalyzing a random hydrolysis of the oc-1,4 glycosidic linkages in starch. Then these D.E. 10-15 oligo-saccharides are hydrolyzed to produce glucose with 90% 14 Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the three dimensional structure of the the active site in Streptomyces rubiginosus xylose isomerse (40). 15 / Asp 245 HN ASp 255 O \-N / _ O _/ I C\ \\ I, I G|u181 o / o---Mn:+.—o \ IO Glu217 I, \O A3925? \ \ /0~ \ I H O C \\ \ l '2 \ Mn++ 16 Figure 3. Schematic process biochemistry of enzymatic fructose production from starch. l7 Process Stage Enzyme pH Temperature Metal ions Liquefaction Bacterial 6.0 - 80 - 1 20°C Ca+ + Alpha-Amylase 7.0 Malto Dextrln (D.E. 10 -15) (pH Adjustment with Acid) Sacchari- Glucoamylase 4.0 _ 55-so°c iication 5.0 (Filter, pH Adjustment Addition oi Metal Cotactor) Isomerization Glucose 7.0 53-50%; Mg + + isomerase Mn" + C0 + 4- Glucose and Fructose Mixture (58:42) 18 conversion from starch by glucoamylase. which liberates B-glucose consecutively from the non-reducing ends of the oligo-saccharides. Prior to the saccharification step, pH and temperature are adjusted to optimize the activity and stability of glucoamylase. Glucose syrup produced in the second stage is filtered and refined to remove Ca“ ions and other by-products which are inhibitory to glucose isomerase activity. Isomerization of glucose syrup by glucose isomerase produces a fructose/glucose mixture (42:58%), and this final step also requires a re-adjustment of pH and the addition of metal cofactors. To generate the final sweetener product containing 55% fructose, which was judged to be acceptable to replace the sucrose used in food and beverage industry, the 42% fructose syrup is separated by large- scale chromatographic columns, and then blended with an appropriate amount of original feedstock (44). Industrial glucose isomerases are the most expensive starch processing enzymes and they are used in the immobilized form to both prolong enzyme half-life by enhancing thermostability and to allow use of a continuous flow reactor system (45,46). Thus, the high process cost for glucose isomerase might be lowered by using a new source of enzyme with high temperature stability and activity. The current indusuial process is limited to 60°C because of undesirable by-products ‘ and color formation during the glucose isomerization reaction at high temperature and the alkaline pH required for enzymatic stability. If the pH optimum of the enzyme activity could be lowered below 6.5 and temperature optimum raised to 70°C, while enzyme stability is retained, faster reaction rates during isomerization and higher final fructose concenu'ations at equilibrium could be attained. Furthermore, these novel enzymatic process improvements could reduce the viscosity of the glucose feedstock 19 and eliminate pH re-adjustments made after the saccharification step. B. Other saccharidases used in food industry An extensive variety of microbial enzymes are used in the food industry, and the principal enzymes include amylase for starch processing, glucose isomerase for sweetener production, B-galactosidase for milk produCIs and whey processing, pectinase for wine or fruit juice clarification, and protease for meat processing and cheese manufacturing (47). Saccharidases are the mosr important food-indusuial enzymes employed to degrade polysaccharide to oligosaccharides or monosugars, and to convert these sugars into the final desirable form of saccharides in food products. This section will review only the enzymatic aspect of microbial amylases and B- galactosidase. [1] Amylase Amylases are starch degrading enzymes that are widespread in microorganisms, plants, and animals. The term amylase was used to designate enzymes that catalyze the hydrolysis of a-l,4 glucosidic linkages of polysaccharides such as starch or glycogen (48). Starch is the principal storage carbohydrate of plants and its major commercial source in the US. is com. Starch consists of two high molecular weight components: amylose, a linear glucose polymer which contains (rt-1,4 glucosidic linkages; and, amylopectin, a branched polymer which contains a-l,6 glucosidic 20 linkages between linear (rt-1,4 glucose chains (49). Microbial amylases such as or- amylase, glucoamylase, and starch debranching pullulanase have been widely used in starch processing indusuies. (a) (rt-amylase: a-amylases catalyze a random hydrolysis of the (rt-1,4 glucosidic linkages in amylose, amylopectin, and glycogen in an endo-fashion. The end products of enzymatic hydrolysis are oligosaccharides of varying chain lengths with or without branched points with the (rt-configuration. at the reducing glucose unit. or-amylases are able to by-pass 0t-1,6 branch points in starch and the enzyme action results in a rapid decrease in viscosity of starch solution and in the iodine staining power (50). tat-amylases are generally stable in the pH range 5.5-8.0, and optimal activity of the enzymes occurs between pH 5.5 and 6.5 (51). These enzymes have been classified as metalloenzymes and they are stabilized by the presence of calcium ions (48). There are two different types of enzymes, saccharifying or-amylase and liquefying or-amylase which differ in their hydrolysis limits on soluble starch (52,53). Thermostable liquefying (rt—amylases isolated from Bacillus species are used in the first liquefaction step during starch processing for sweetener production (Figure 2). (b) Glucoamylase: Glucoamylase is an exo-acting enzyme that yields B-D- glucose from the non-reducing ends of amylose, amylopectin, and glycogen by hydrolysis of (rt-1,4 glycosidic linkages in a consecutive manner. It also hydrolyzes 0t-l,6 and (1-1,3 linkages at a much slower rate than Ot-l,4 linkages. Glucoamylases are found in fungi and the enzymes used commercially originate from either 21 Aspergillus niger or Rhizopus species (54), where they are used for the conversion of malto-oligosaccharides into D-glucose (Figure 2). The pH and temperature optima of most glucoamylases are in the range of 4.5-5.0 and 40-60°C, respectively (55). All fungal glucoamylases are glycoproteins containing 5-20% carbohydrate in the enzyme molecule. Glucoamylases differ from a—glucosidases in their subsuate specificity and the stereo configuration of the glucose product (56). Ot-glucosidase catalyzes the hydrolysis of or-l,4 linked or-D-glucose residues from the non-reducing ends in short chain oligosaccharides or maltose to release ct-D-glucose as a final product. (c) Pullulanase: Pullulanase is a starch debranching enzyme that hydrolyzes 0t-1,6 glucosidic linkages in pullulan, amylopectin or glycogen (57). The enzyme converts pullulan into maltotriose in an endo-fashion (58), and isomaltose, panose, or amylose are not degraded by pullulanase (59). The pH optima for pullulanases were reported to be 5.9-7.0, and the temperature optima of the enzyme ranges between 45- 60°C (55). When starch is hydrolyzed with or—amylase, the branch points of amylopectin are resistant to attack, and the prolonged action of (rt-amylase on starch ' results in the formation of or-limit dextrin. Glucoamylases, on the other hand, are able to hydrolyze the (rt-1,6 linkages of starch, but the reaction proceeds relatively slowly due to their low affinity for the branch points. Therefore, pullulanases are generally used in combination with the saccharifying or-amylase, or glucoamylase to improve the saccharification and glucose yields from starch. It is interesting to note that recent studies on new pullulanases purified from thermoanaerobic bacteria 22 indicated that both or-1,6 linkages in pullulan and (rt-1,4 linkages in amylose could be cleaved by a new enzyme type, amylopullulanase (60). [2] B-galactosidase B-galactosidase hydrolyzes the B-D-galactosidic linkage of lactose to generate an equimolar mixture of glucose and galactose. In practice, depending on the conditions, the equimolar pattern is sometimes not followed because B-galactosidase displays reversion activity and can form allolactose and other oligosaccharide from galactose (61). Temperature and pH optima for this enzyme activity differs according to the enzyme source. In general, fungal B-galactosidases have pH optima in the acid range (2.5-4.5) and bacterial enzymes are in the neutral region (6.5-7.5) (62). Although the temperature optima of most B—galactosidases examined range between 50-60°C, one thermostable enzyme from Thermus aquaticus, an aerobic species, was reported to have an optimal temperature at 80°C (63). Lactose is a disaccharide found in milk products and by-products (whey), and is an important dietary carbohydrate. Hydrolysis of lactose during the processing of milk based products can potentially solve the digestion problems of lactase deficient adults, ’ improve the solubility and decrease the tendency of crystallization during ice cream and yogurt production, and if further converted to fructose by other enzymes require less additive sugars in these dairy products (64). 23 C. Thermostable Biocatalysts The recent interest in biotechnology coupled with the discovery of new, novel therrnophiles has prompted studies on the general properties of their enzymes, understanding molecular mechanisms of enzyme thennophilicity, and the utilization of them for indusuial purposes (65). As thermostable biocatalysts, thermophilic bacteria and/or their enzymes have potential for industrial applications due to their unique kinetic and stability properties, and because operation at high temperature often minimizes the risk of microbial contamination and lowers capital cost for large scale production with improved mass transfer rates for certain substrates and products (66,67). In this section, the microbial and enzymatic aspects of thermophilicity will be reviewed as it relates to the research presented in this thesis. [1] Thermophilic bacteria Extremely thermophilic bacteria display temperature optima for growth at 60°C to above 100°C, but do not proliferate at temperature below 40°C. Extreme therm0philes often possess faster metabolic rates and produce more active and stable enzymes than those found in either mesophilic bacteria, yeasts, fungi, plants, or animals (66). A variety of thermophilic saccharolytic anaerobes have been isolated from self-heating (manure piles and wet soils) or volcanic features in nature (68,69,70,71). These thermoanaerobic species display diverse properties in terms of growth characteristics, substrates utilized, metabolic pathways, enzymes, and fermentation products. 24 Clostridium thermosulfitrogenes is a Gram-negative, spore forming rod that has a double-layered wall without an outer membrane layer (72). This novel species can utilize pectin as an energy source and transforms thiosulfate into elemental sulfur which deposits in the culture medium and on the cells. The organism ferments a variety of carbohydrates at 60°C such as xylose, galactose, glucose, starch, maltose, cellobiose, and sucrose; and it forms ethanol, acetate, lactate, and H,/CO2 as fermentation products. It also produces a highly thermostable and active B—amylase when grown on starch (73). Thermoanaerobacter strain B6A is a Gram-negative, non-spore forming rod that utilizes a very wide range of carbohydrates as a carbon source including xylan, xylose, starch, and glucose, but not cellulose (74). It can grow in a chemically defined medium at pH 3.5 and 60°C. Fermentation products from either glucose or xylan include ethanol, acetate, lactate, and HJCOZ. Clostridium thermohydrosulfuricum is a spore forming rod and its endospore displays extreme heat resistance (75). This species grows optimally at temperature of 65°C, and utilizes a broad range of subsu'ates as energy sources including xylose, starch, galactose, and cellobiose. Starch grown cells produce an amylopullulanase ' that can cleave both or-l,4 and a—l,6 glucosidic linkages of amylose and pullulan, respectively (60). [2] Thermophilic enzymes There has been increasing research interest in enzymes from thermophilic microorganisms during the last decade. Thermophilic enzymes are very active and 25 diSplay long half-life at elevated temperature ( > 60°C), and are less active but more resistant to most common protein denaturants than their counterparts from mesophilic sources at lowered (< 40°C) temperatures (76,77). A variety of thermostable enzymes have been studied and characterized for their physicochemical and catalytic properties, and many of them are now used extensively in industrial processes (78-80). In general, high thermostability of enzyme from extreme thermophiles is an inuinsic property, specified by the amino acid sequence and certain key amino acid residues in the protein secondary and tertiary structure (81-84). A major molecular mechanism proposed for thennophilicity of enzymes is explained on the basis of higher free energy of stabilization (A G) within the protein molecule, which represents a delicate balance between the stabilizing forces and the conformational enu'opy of the protein required to maintain the tertiary structure of the enzyme (85,86). Small percentage changes in either the stabilizing or destabilizing forces can result in large changes in the net free energy of stabilization, which explains how high thermostability of a protein can be conferred by small differences in the amino acid sequence that give rise to a few additional intramolecular interactions without any "obvious" su'uctural alterations (82,87). Recently, protein engineering approaches ' have used site directed mutagenesis techniques to insert amino acid changes into enzymes in order to demonstrate the effect of protein chemical structure on enzyme thermostability (88,89). However, a limitation to the successful design of a thennophilic-thennostable protein by engineering techniques is that the effects of amino acid replacements are not easy to predict and thus it is difficult to decide which amino acid substitutions should be made. Therefore, an understanding of the 26 exact structure-function mechanisms that account for activity and stability relationships in thermophilic enzymes could be essential for engineering high thermostability and activity in proteins. Unfortunately, no specific explanations on the molecular mechanism of enzyme thennophilicity can be made at this time because only a handful of reports exist on understanding how to make a thermolabile enzyme stable at high temperature or why a thermophilic enzyme is active and stable at high temperature. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. REFERENCES Takasaki, Y., Kosugi, Y., and Kanbayashi, A. (1969) Agric. Biol. Chem. 33, 1527-1534 Suekane, M., Tamura, M., and Tomimura, C. (1978) Agric. Biol. Chem. 42, 909-917 Chen, W.P., and Anderson, A.W. (1979) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 38, 1111- 1119 Kasumi, T., Hayashi, K., and Tsumura, N. (1981) Agric. Biol. Chem. 45, 619- 627 Callens, M., Kersters-Hilderson, H., Opstal, O.V., and De Bruyne, CK. (1986) Enzyme Micro. Technol. 8, 696—700 Scallet, B.L., Shieh, K.,Ehrenthal, I., and Slapshak, L. (1974) Die Starke 26, 405-444 Danno, G. (1970) Agric. Biol. Chem. 34, 1795-1804 Yamanaka, K., and Takahara, N. (1977) Agric. Biol. Chem. 41, 1909-1915 Chen, W. (1980) Process Biochem. 15, 30-35 Chen, W. (1980) Process Biochem. 15, 36-41 Srinivasan, M.C., Vartak, H.G., Powar, V.K., and Khire, J.M. (1983) Biotech. Lett. 5, 611-614 Chen, W.P., Anderson, A.W., and Han, Y.W. (1979) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 37, 324-331 Anuim, R.L., Collila, W., and Schnyder, BJ. (1979) in Applied Biochemistry and Bioengineering (Wingard, L.B., ed) vol. 2, pp. 97, Academic Press, New York Dano, G. (1971) Agric. Biol. Chem. 35, 997-1006 Yamanaka, K. (1969) Archiv. Biochem. Biophys. 131, 502-506 Young. J.M., Schray, KL, and Mildvan, A.S. (1975) J. Biol. Chem. 250, 9021- 9027 27 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 28 Lawlis, V.B., Dennis, M.S., Chen, E.Y., Smith, DH, and Henner, DJ. (1984) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 47, 15-21 Shamanna, D.K., and Sanderson, KB. (1979) J. Bacteriol. 139, 71-79 Ghangas, GS, and Wilson, DB. (1984) J. Bacteriol. 157, 158-164 Schellenberg, G.D., Sarthy, A., Larson, A.E., Backer, M.P., Crabb, J.W., Lidstrom, M., Hall, B.D., and Furlong, CE. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 6826- 6832 Wilhelm, M., and Hollenberg, GP. (1984) EMBO Journal 3, 2555-2560 Wilhelm, M., and Hollenberg, GP. (1985) Nucleic Acids Res. 13, 5717-5723 Batt, C.A., O’Neil, E., Novak, S.R., Ko, J., and Sinskey, A. (1986) Biotechnology Progress. 2, 140-144 Panagiotis, ES, and Ho, N.W.Y. (1985) Enzyme Micro. Technol. 7, 592-596 Wovcha, M.G., Steuerwald, D.L., and Brooks, K.F. (1983) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 45, 1402-1404 Marcel, T., Drocourt, D., and Tiraby, G. (1987) Mol. Gen. Genet. 208, 121- 126 Drocourt, D., Bejar, S., Calmels, T., Reynes, J.P., and Tiraby, G. (1988) Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 9337 Saari, G.C., Kumar, A.A., Kawasaki, G.H., Insley, M.Y., and O’Hara, RI. (1987) J. Bacteriol. 169, 612-618 Henrick, K., Collyer, C.A., and Blow, D.M. (1989) J. Mol. Biol. 208, 129-157 Rose, I.A., O’Connell, EL, and Mortlock, RP. (1969) Biochem. Biophysic. Acta 178, 376-379 Ramchander, S., and Feather, MS. (1977) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 178, 576- 580 Suckling, K.E. (1985) in Comprehensive Biotechnology (Moo-Young, M., Bull, A., and Dalton, H. ed) vol.l, pp. 539-551, Pergarmon Press, Oxford Schray, K.J., and Rose, LA. (1971) Biochemistry 10, 1058-1062 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 29 Makkee, M., Kieboom, A.P.G., and van Bekkum, H. (1984) Reel.: J. R. Neth. Chem. Soc. 103, 361-164 Gaikwas, S.M., More, M.W., Vartak, H.G., and Deshpande, V.V. (1988) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 155, 270-277 Carrell, H.L., Rubin, B.H., Hurley, T.J., and Glusker, LP. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 3230-3236 Farber, G.K., Petsko, GA, and Ringe, D. (1987) Protein Engineering 1, 459- 466 Rey, F., Jenkins, J., Janin, J., Lasters, 1., Alard, P., Claessens, M., Matthyssens, G., and Wodak, S. (1988) Proteins 4, 165-172 Dauter, Z., Dauter, M., Hemker, J., Witzel, H., and Wilson, KS. (1989) FEBS Letters 7, 1-8 Carrell, H.L., Glusker, J.P., Burger, V., Manfre, F., Tritsch, D., and Biellmann, J.-F. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, 4440-4444 Lambert, P.W., and Meers, LL. (1983) Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 300, 263-282 Coker, L.B., and Venkatasubramanian, K. (1985) in Biotechnology Applications and Research (Cheremisinoff, RN, and Ovellette, R.P., eds) pp. 165-171, , Technorrric Publishing Co., Lancaster, Basel Reichelt, JR. (1983) in Industrial Enzymology (Godfrey, T., and Reichelt, J., eds) pp. 375-396, The Nature Press Bucke, C. (1983) Trends in Biotechnol. 1, 67-69 Verhoff, F.H., Boguslawski, G., Lantero, O.J., Schlager, S.T., and Jao, Y.C. (1985) in Comprehensive Biotechnology (Moo-Young, M., ed), vol.3, pp. 837- 859, Pergamon Press. Oxford, New York Schnyder, 3.]. (1974) Die Starke 26, 409-412 Peppler, H.J., and Reed, G. (1987) in Biotechnology (Kennedy, J.F. ed), vol. 7a, pp. 547-603, VCH Publishers, NY Fischer, E.H., and Stein, EA. (1960) in The Enzymes (Boyer, P.D., Lardy, L., and Myrback, K. eds), vol. 4, pp.3l3-343, Academic Press, NY French, D. (1975) in Biochemistry of Carbohydrates (Kornberg, H.L., Phillips, 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 61. 62. 63. 65. 66. 67. 30 D.C., and Whelan, W.J. eds), vol. 5. PP. 267-335 Fogarty, W.M., and Kelly, CT. (1980) in Microbial Enzymes and Bioconversions (Rose, A.H. ed), pp. 116-158, Academic Press Manning, G.B., and Campbell, LL. (1961) J.Biol. Chem. 236, 2952-2957 Fukumoto, J., and Okada, S. (1963) J. Ferment. Technol. 41, 427-434 Pazur, J.H., and Okada, S. (1966) J. Biochem. 241, 4146-4151 Underkofler, L.A., Denault, L.J., and Hon, E.F. (1965) Die Starke 17, 179-184 Fogarty, W.M. (1982) in Microbial Enzymes and Biorechnology (Fogarty, W.M. ed), pp. 1-92, Applied Sciece Publishers, NY Reese, E.T., Maguire, A.H., and Parrish, F.W. (1968) Can. J. Biochem. 46, 25- 34 Lee, E.Y.C., and Whelan, W.J. (1971) in The Enzymes (Boyer, P.D. ed), vol. 5, pp. 191-234, Academic Press, NY Drummond, G.S., Smith, E.E., and Whelan, W.J. (1969) FEBS Lett. 5, 85-88 Bender, H., and Wallenfels, K. (1966) Methods in Enzymology 8,555-559 Saha, B.C., Mathupala, SR, and Zeikus, JG. (1988) Biochem. J. 252, 343- 348 Shukla, T. (1975) CRC Critical Reviews in Food Technology 1, 325-347 Gekas, V., and Lopez-Leiva, M. (1985) Process Biochem. February, 2-12 Ulrich, J.T., McFeters, G.A., and Temple, KL. (1972) J. Bacteriol. 110, 691- 698 Pedersen, S., and Norman, BE. (1986) in Chemical Aspecs of Food Enzymes (Andrews, A.T. ed), pp.156-187, Royal Society of Chemistry Brock, TD. (1986) in Therrnophiles; General, Molecular, and Applied Microbiology. (Brock, T.D. ed), pp. 1-16, John Wiley and Sons, New York Zeikus, JG. (1979) Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1, 243-252 Zeikus, JG. (1980) Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 34, 423-464 68. 69. 70. 71. 72. 73. 74. 75. 76. 77. 78. 79. 80. 81. 82. 83. 31 Ben-Bassat, A., and Zeikus, J.G. (1981) Arch. Microbiol. 128, 365-370 Weimer, P.J., Wagner, L.W., Knowlton, S., and Ng, T.K. (1984) Arch. Microbiol. 138, 31-36 Ljungdahl, L.G., Bryant, F., Carreira, L., Saiki, T., and Weigel, T. (1981) in Trends in the Biology of Fermentation for Fuels and Chemicals. (Lollaender ed.), pp. 397, Plenum Press. New York Zeikus, J.G., Ben-Bassat, A., and Hegge, P.W. ( 1980) J. Bacteriol. 143, 432-440 Schink, B., and Zeikus, J.G. (1983) J. Gen. Microbiol. 129, 1149-1158 Hyun, H.H., and Zeikus, J.G. (1985) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 49, 1162- 1167 Weimer, RI. (1985) Arch. Microbiol. 143, 130-136 Hyun, H.H., Zeikus, J.G., Longin, R., Millet, J., and Ryten, A. (1983) J. Bacteriol. 156, 1332-1337 Zuber, H. (1978) in Biochemistry of Thennophily (Friedman, S.M. ed), pp. 267-285, Academic Press, New York. Amelunxen, RE, and Murdock, AL. (1978) in Microbial Life in Extreme Environments (Kushner, D.J. ed), pp. 215-278, Academic Press, London. Ng. T.K., Kenealy, W.R. (1986) in Thermophiles; General, Molecular, and Applied Microbiology. (Brock, T.D. ed), pp. 197-215, John Wiley and Sons, New York Klibanov, A.M. (1983) in Applied Microbiology (Laskin, A.I. ed), vol.29, pp. 1-28, Academic Press, New York. Schmid, RD. (1979) in Advances in Biochemical Engineering (Fiechter, A. et al. eds), vol.12, pp. 41-118, Spring-Verlag, Berlin. Frank, G., and Tratschin, JD. (1979) Biochemistry 18, 5698-5703 Daniel, RM. (1986) in Protein Structure, Folding, and Design (Oxender, D.L. ed), pp. 291-296, Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York. Fontana, A. (1988) Biophys. Chem. 29, 181-193 84. 85. 86. 87. 88. 89. 90. 91. 92. 93. 94. 32 Vihinen, M. (1987) Protein Engineering 1, 477-480 Creighton, TE. (1984) in Protein; Su'ucture and Molecular Properties, pp. 133-158, W.H. Freeman and Co., New York. Dill, K.A. (1987) in Protein Engineering (Oxender, D.L., Fos, C.F. eds), pp. 187-192, Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York. Holmes, M.A., and Matthews, B.W. (1982) J. Mol. Biol. 160, 623-639 Fersht, A.R., Leatherbarrow, R.J., and Wells, TN. (1986) Nature 322, 284-286 Beasty, A.M., Hurle, M., Manz, J.T., Stackhouse, T., and Matthews, CR. (1987) in Protein Engineering (Oxender, D.L., Fox, C.F. eds), pp. 91- 102, Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York. Danno, G., Yoshimura, S., and Natake, M. (1967) Agric. Biol. Chem. 3, 284-292 Tucker, M.Y., Tucker, M.P., Himmel, M.E., Grohmann, K., and Lastick, SM. (1988) Biotechnol. Lett. 10, 79-84 Gong, C.S., Chen, L., and Tsao, GT. (1980) Biotechnol. Bioeng. 22, 833-845 Kasumi, T., Hayashi, K., and Tsumura, N. (1981) Agric. Biol. Chem. 45, 619-627 Kasumi, T., Hayashi, K., Tsumura, N., and Takagi, T. (1981) Agric. Biol. Chem. 45, 1087-1095 Chapter II Regulation and Characterization of Thermoanaerobacter Glucose Isomerase in Relation to Thermostable Saccharidase Synthesis and Development of a Single Step Process for Sweetener Production 33 ABSTRACT Regulation of glucose isomerase synthesis was studied in Thermoanaerobacter strain B6A which fermented a wide variety of carbohydrates including glucose, xylose, lactose, starch, and xylan. Glucogenic amylase activities and B-galactosidase were produced constitutively, whereas the synthesis of glucose isomerase was induced by either xylose or xylan. Production of saccharidase was not significantly repressed by the presence of glucose or 2-deoxy-glucose in the growth media. In order to maximize glucose isomerase production, the culture pH was controlled at 5.5 during xylose fermentation. The apparent temperature and pH optima for these cell-bound saccharidase activities were: glucose isomerase 80°C, 7.0-7.5; glucogenic amylases 70°C, 5.0-5.5; and B-galactosidase 60°C, 6.0-6.5. Glucose isomerase, glucogenic amylases, and B-galactosidase activities were produced in xylose grown cells that were active and stable at 60°C and pH 6.0-6.5. Under single step process conditions, these enzyme activities in whole cells or cell extracts converted starch or lactose directly into fructose mixtures. Starch was 96% converted into a 49:51 mixture of glucose and fructose; whereas lactose was 85% converted into a 40:31:29 mixture of ' galactose, glucose, and fructose. 34 INTRODUCTION The production of sweetener from corn starch by microbial saccharidases is an important application of enzyme technology in the food industry (7). The current process for high fructose corn syrup production involves several separate enzymatic steps including liquefaction by (rt-amylase, saccharification by glucoamylase, and isomerization by glucose isomerase. These steps require different reaction conditions (i.e. temperature, pH, and metal cofactors) (1,3). Most industrial saccharidases used in sweetener production require high thermostability and low production costs, and they are produced by mesophilic microbes. Many studies have been made on searching for more thermostable saccharidases and on immobilization of glucose isomerase to prolong enzyme half-life in the reactor (14,19,28). Also, many efforts have been made on strain improvement for hyper-producers of saccharidases and on selection for the use of catabolite resistant or constitutive mutants to lower enzyme production costs (12,24). Recently, our laboratory reported Clostridium thermohydrosulfuricum produce highly thermostable amylolytic enzymes including glucogenic amylase, pullulanase, and glucosidase activities (14-16). When purified to homogeneity, this pullulanase was shown to cleave both a-1,6 bonds in pullulan and tit-1,4 bonds in amylose and has been named amylopullulanase (23), and Thermoanaerobacter strain B6A has the same enzyme activities (B.C. Saha, R. Lamed, C. Lee, S.P. Mathupala, J.G. Zeikus, manuscript submitted to Appl. Environ. Microbiol.). Although glucose isomerase and B-galactosidase have been detected in thermophilic microorganisms (6,11,20), little 35 36 is known about the biochemical properties and regulation of these enzymes in thermoanaerobic bacteria. In this paper, we report on the regulation and general biochemical properties of glucose isomerase in relation to other saccharidase activities from T hermoanaerobacter strain B6A. Notably, growth conditions were discovered that enabled glucose isomerase to be produced in conjunction with glucogenic amylases and B-galactosidase activities. Thus, a single step process was developed to produce fructose mixtures from starch or lactose with Thermoanaerobacter saccharidases. MATERIALS AND METHODS Chemicals and Gases Medium components and all chemicals were reagent grade. Larchwood xylan (Lot 113F-0003) was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, Mo.). The N,,/CO2 (95:5) gas was obtained from Linde, Union Carbide Corporation (East Lansing, MI) and passed through heated copper columns to remove 02 prior to use. Organism Thermoanaerobacter strain B6A isolated from a volcanic hot spring in Themopolis, Wyoming (27) was obtained from Dr. Paul Weimer (USDA Dairy Forage Lab, Madison, WI) and was maintained by stringent anaerobic culture techniques (29) in CM5 medium containing 0.5% xylan. Culture Conditions, and Growth Measurement Experimental cultures were grown at 60°C without shaking in either 125 ml serum bottles or in 26 ml anaerobic pressure tubes that contained 50 ml or 10 ml of TYE medium (29) supplemented with 1% carbon source and with a N,/CO2 (95:5) gas headspace. Enzyme production time course studies during xylose fermentation were conducted in a New Brunswick (Edison, NJ.) Multigen fermentor that contained 500 ml of TYE medium. The ferrnentor cultures were incubated at 60°C and gassed continuously with N2/CO2 (95:5) gas and mixed at 100 rpm. For the constant pH experiments, 0.5N NH.,OH was added during the fermentation by a feeding pump 37 38 which was connected to a pH controller. Cells used for crude enzyme extract preparations were cultured in a 14 liter New Brunswick fermentor containing 10 L of TYE medium at pH 6.8 with 1% xylose that was stirred at 60°C under a NleO2 (95:5) gas stream. Cell growth in media containing soluble substrates was determined by measuring the optical density of the culture broth at 660 nm. When xylan was present in culture medium, ethanol concentration in culture supernatant was used to measure growth. Ethanol was measured in acidified samples by gas chromatography using a flame ionization detector with N2 as the carrier gas and methods described elsewhere (16). Experimental ethanol production was related to growth by standard optical density (O.D.) versus ethanol plots determined with xylose medium. Enzyme Preparations and Assays For the preparation of the washed cells and culture supernatants, cultures were harvested during late exponential growth phase by cenuifugation at 8,000 x g for 15 min. The supernatant was decanted, and the cells were washed with double distilled water and suspended in the appropriate amount of double distilled water. Cell extract was prepared using fermentation grown cells recovered at the exponential phase (11 h) with a Millipore pellicon cell harvester (Bedford, MA.) and washed with double distilled water. Wet cell paste (1 g) was suspended in either 50 ml of 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) containing 10 mM MgCl2 for glucose isomerase preparation, in 50 ml of 100 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.5) for glucogenic amylase, or in 50 ml of 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) 39 for B—galactosidase. The cells were disrupted by passage through a French pressure cell (American Instrument Co. Inc., Silver Spring, MD) at 20,000 lbfrn2 and the supernatant was collected after centrifugation at 15,000 x g for 30 min at 4°C. Protein concentration was detennined by the Lowry assay method (18). The crude saccharidase preparation was stable upon incubation indicating the lack of significant protease activity. Xylanase activities were assayed by measuring the rate of reducing sugar formation from xylan; whereas, amylase is reported as glucose or reducing sugars produced from starch or pullulan (when indicated). The reaction mixture contained 1% subsuate in 0.1 M sodium acetate buffer at pH 6.0, 5.5 or 5.0 with pullulan, soluble starch or xylan as respective substrates. After 30 min incubation at 65°C, the reaction mixtures were boiled in a steam bath for 5 min to stop the reaction. The samples were cenuifuged and the amount of reducing sugars were quantified by the diniu'osalicylic acid method (21). Alternatively, glucose in the supernatant was determined by using either a glucose analyzer (Yellow Stone Instrument, model 27) or by a Sigma enzymatic glucose diagnostic kit. One unit of activity is defined as the amount of enzyme which released 1 moi of reducing sugar per min under the assay conditions described above, with glucose as standard for amylase activity and with xylose as standard for xylanase activity. Glucose isomerase activity was measured by incubating a reaction mixture that contained 0.8 M glucose in 0.1 M sodium phosphate or 0.1 M MOPS buffer (pH 7.0) and 10 mM MgSO., 1 mM C00,, and the enzyme. After incubation at 65°C for 30 min, the amount of fructose formed was estimated by the cysteine carbazole sulfuric acid method (8). B-galactosidase activity was assayed by measuring the 4O amount of phenoxide ion liberated from ortho-nitrophenol-B-D-galactopyranoside (ONPG) at 420 nm after 20 min incubation at 60°C. The reaction mixture contained 10 mM KCl, 1 mM MgSO., 5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 2.7 mM ONPG with the enzyme in 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) (22). One unit of amylase, glucose isomerase, and B—galactosidase activity is defined as the amount of enzyme required to produce 1 umol of glucose, fructose, and phenoxide ion, respectively, per min under the assay conditions described above. All the enzyme activities were determined at points where product formation was linear with time. One Step Conversion of Starch or Lactose to Fructose Starch (i.e., maltodextrin DE 10 and soluble starch) or lactose in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer containing 10 mM MgSO4 and 1 mM CoCl, was incubated with cell extracts prepared from xylose grown cells at various temperatures (60-70°C) and pH’s (6.0-6.8). Samples were taken during time course experiments performed in 50 ml serum vials containing 5 ml reaction mixtures that were sealed with rubber bungs, and were shaken at 100 rpm in a New Brunswick water bath shaker. Samples withdrawn from the reaCtion mixture were boiled in a steam bath for 5 min and centrifuged before sugar analysis. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed by high pressure liquid chromatography with saccharide analysis columns heated to 85°C. An Aminex HPX-87C and HPX-87P column (Bio-Rad Laboratories; Richmond, CA) were used for analysis of starch and lactose conversion, respectively. RESULTS Location and Types of Saccharidase Activities Thermoanaerobacter strain B6A ferments starch and hemicellulose but not cellulose(27). In preliminary experiments, halos appeared around colonies grown on either Remazol Brilliant Blue-xylan agar plates or on starch agar plates stained with iodine indicating that the organism produced amylase and xylanase activities. Experiments were initiated to determine the kinds of saccharidases and their cellular location when Thermoanaerobacter was grown on different saccharides as carbon and energy sources for growth. Table 1 shows that Thermoanaerobacter produces glucose isomerase, B-galactosidase as well as glucogenic amylase and xylanase activities. Glucogenic amylase activity was extracellular and cell bound when starch or pullulan was used as subsuate. It was not possible to discern whether the glucogenic amylase represented a mixture of a-amylase and glucoamylase or amylopullulanase and or-glucosidase by the assays used. However, About 70- 80% of xylanase activity was excreted into the medium and the remaining activity was cell associated in xylan grown cultures. On the other hand, glucose isomerase, and B-galactosidase activities were t0tally cell bound. Regulation of Glucose Isomerase Production Experiments were conducted to determine the regulation of glucose isomerase synthesis in relation to amylase and B-galactosidase producrion. The results presented in Table 2 illustrate that glucose isomerase was only produced when either xylose or 41 42 Table l. Cellularglocation of saccharidase activities in Thermoanaerobacter strain B6A.‘I Activity (unit/ml) Carbon Final Growth Saccharidase Substrate (OD. 660 nm) Supernatant Washed Cell" Glucose Isomerase xylose l. 15 0.00 0.21 B-galacto- sidase lactose 0.98 0.00 0. 14 Amylase starch 1.07 0.04 0.19 pullulan 1.07 0.73 0.43 Xylanasec xylan 0.80 0.47 0. 18 ‘Cultures were grown in TYE medium with 1.0% carbon substrate at 60°C. ”Cells were resuspended in 1/10 culture volume of double distilled water and activity was converted to the original culture volume. cDue to the interference of xylan optical absorbance, cell growth was converted from ethanol production in relation to a standard growth curve. 43 Table 2. Effect of growth substrate on saccharidase synthesis in Thermoanaerobacter strain B6A. Specific Activity (U/mg cell protein) ' Final Growth" Glucose Glucogenic B—galactosidase Growth Substrate‘ (O.D.6«,) Isomerase Amylase Starch 1.36 0.00 0.61 0.41 Lactose 0.83 0.00 0.54 0.46 Maltose 0.75 0.00 0.43 0.38 Cellobiose 1.23 0.00 0.59 0.44 Glucose 1.60 0.00 0.42 0.31 Xylose 1.47 0.62 0.60 0.47 Xylan 0.68 0.39 0.58 0.33 Xylose + Glucose 1.46 0.36 0.48 0.34 Starch + Glucose 1.24 0.00 0.46 0.35 Lactose + Glucose 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.40 Xylose + 2-Deoxy-Glc 0.80 0.40 0.38 0.33 Starch + 2-Deoxy-Glc 0.95 0.00 0.48 0.42 Lactose + 2-Deoxy-Glc 0.46 0.00 0.30 0.33 Glucose + 2-Deoxy-Glc 0.98 0.00 0.33 0.25 2-Deoxy-Glc 0.1 1 n.d. n.d. n.d. None 0. 10 n.d n.d. n.d. * n.d. = Not Determined. 'Cultures were grown on TYE medium containing 0.5% main substrate and with or without 0.3% supplementing glucose or 0.1% 2-deoxy-glucose (2-Deoxy-Glc). bOptical density was measured at the early stationary growth phase. 44 xylan was present as an inducer in the culture medium. Notably, glucogenic amylase and B-galactosidase were produced constitutively on the wide range of growth substrates tested. The specific activities of glucogenic amylases from starch grown cultures and B-galactosidase from lactose grown cultures were equal to those obtained from xylose grown culture. The presence of 0.1% 2-deoxy-glucose in culture media containing either 0.5% starch, xylose, or lactose did not repress synthesis of either glucogenic amylase, glucose isomerase, or [Ll-galactosidase. respectively. In order to assess the mechanism of glucose isomerase synthesis, experiments were performed where glucose was added during xylan fermentation time courses and glucose isomerase activity was periodically assayed. Due to the turbidity of xylan, cell growth was monitored by measuring the concentration of ethanol in the culture broth. Ethanol was one of the major end products of Thermoanaerobacter fermentations (27) and its exponential production during growth is proportional to cell density measured by absorbance at 660 nm during xylose fermentation. These results shown in Figure 1 indicate that synthesis of glucose isomerase during exponential growth was not catabolite repressed by glucose, while xylanase production ceased after glucose addition during exponential growth on xylan (data not shown). Figure 2 compares glucose isomerase and amylase aetivity levels during xylose fermentations in the absence (A) and presence (B) of pH control at 5.5. Synthesis of both enzyme activities were tightly growth coupled under either condition. Glucose isomerase activity, however, decreased rapidly in the stationary phase cultures that were not maintained at pH 5.5. Amylase and B-galactosidase (data not shown) were quite stable throughout the stationary phase. Consequently, pH control at 5.5 45 Figure 1. Effect of glucose addition on glucose isomerase synthesis during xylan fermentation. Cultures were grown on CM5 medium with 0.5% xylan at 60°C, and 0.3% glucose was added during the middle of exponential growth phase (8.). Ethanol concentration in culture broth was measured as a growth indicator and 25 mM ethanol represents CD. 1.0 at 660 nm in a standard growth curve. The closed symbols represent the culture growth whereas open symbols represent enzyme activity. The culture conditions indicated by symbols are: triangles, glucose only (control); circles, without glucose addition; squares, with glucose addition. 46 N 01 N 0 GROWTH (mM,Ethanol produced) 5 Growth (control) N _ 7 Growth (+Glcl Growth Glc I-Glcl .. " (Lil-(31c): G.Ht-Glc) G.HCOMtOll A A A A A 1 A 4 6 8 IO 12 l4 IS 20 Time ( hours) .0 N 0.15 .0 .0 O or '( 1mm) Aigxiiov asoratuosl asoonig 47 Figure 2. Effect of pH control on saccharidase production during xylose fermentation. Cultures were grown in 500 ml TYE medium containing 2% xylose in a Multigen fermentor at 60°C. A: without pH control; B: pH was controlled at 5.5 by feeding 0.5 N NI-LOH. Symbols represent glucose isomerase (G.I.) and amylase (A.). 48 maize >923. 2:3: maize >35: 2:3: 0000 7.6. 4.321. 7.54. 0050 0.0 20 1 16 14 J. «(5.1. r 12 20 8 10 12 14 16 Timelhoursl 6 m U m l O I‘ v I e m .. 8 T .. 6 i 4 2 B __ _ . _ _ A _ _ _ 1O 0 O. 0. 7654rc4. w m m m6.5.4 4. 3.. 2 l Amnesia AEcommddv £265 3:: 31a 250309 5380 47 Figure 2. Effect of pH control on saccharidase production during xylose fermentation. Cultures were grown in 500 ml TYE medium containing 2% xylose in a Multigen fermentor at 60°C. A: without pH control; B: pH was controlled at 5.5 by feeding 0.5 N NI-LOH. Symbols represent glucose isomerase (G.I.) and amylase (A.). 48 (Iw/m Kiww owizua 0.4 ' Time (hours) A 35 7. 77.0 55 .0 r: so 50 a 4 40 E 4. - § ‘00 0.7 ‘0. 10- 0.6 3 K A. 05 3 <— 6.1. 03 65 tq- 0.2 0.1 1 1 l 1 l 2 4 6 8 IO 12 I4 16 20 Time (hours) B 23: 7.0 g e. I 5. £14. ... 4.0 ,1 T E40— 8 0.7 g 3.0— 0.6 9' 0.5 £ 20- E» 03 0 “1— 0.2 0.1 1 1 1 1 4 1 J _ 2 4 6 e 10 12 I4 16 20 49 was used in xylose fermentations to obtain Thermoanaerobacter enzyme preparations that contained active levels of amylase, glucose isomerase, and B-galactosidase. Physicochemical Properties of Saccharidases The temperature and pH activity and stability profiles for glucose isomerase and B-galactosidase were compared to the amylase activities in Thermoanaerobacter exuacts prepared from washed whole cells grown on xylose. Glucose isomerase, amylase, and B-galactosidase displayed an apparent temperature optimum for activity between 75-80°C, 70°C, and 65°C, respectively (Figure 3A). The effect of temperature on the stability of these enzyme activities is shown in Figure 3B. Cell exu'acts for enzyme assays were pre-incubated prior to measuring the residual a activities in 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) containing 10 mM MgSO, and 1 mM CoCl2 for glucose isomerase, in 100 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.5) for amylase, and in 100 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 6.0) for B-galactosidase. Under these conditions, glucose isomerase, amylase, and B-galactosidase were stable up to 60 min at 85°C, 70°C, and 60°C, respectively. Figure 4 illustrates the dependence of saccharidase activities on pH. Glucose isomerase displayed a broad pH range for activity from 5.5 to 9.0 with an apparent pH optimum of 7.0-7.5. During the enzyme assay at alkaline pH, chemical isomerization of glucose to fructose by alkali caused a high background reading and the amount of product formed by enzymatic isomerization was calculated by subtracting the control value from the total experimental value. The amylase and B- galactosidase activities displayed a narrower pH range for activity than that of glucose 50 Figure 3. Comparison of temperature optima for activities (A) and stabilities (B) of glucose isomerase, amylase, and B-galactosidase. Enzymes were assayed with cell extract from xylose grown cells. 100% activity corresponds to 0.60 U/mg; 0.58 U/mg, 0.46 U/mg for glucose isomerase, amylase, B- galactosidase, respectively. Cell extracts in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) for glucose isomerase, in 100 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.5) for amylase, and in 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) for B-galactosidase were preincubated at the indicated temperatures prior to the assay for residual enzyme activities. 51 2;»: us: a; EDGEEE O m CM 0% Din O.N O._ 00 _ 0.0 0.0 0.x. 0.0 0.0 0.? 0pm 0 0.2. . MN? .1 i cm 0 o 1 O». 0.8 e e e o e. . .4 0m . .. u 8 O.\\1111O o o o o o o 0.3 Sov_mo.uo_oo-m o omenfiozgooi 1 oo_ 1 ON 1 0*» 4 Om 1 Om 30:64 30164 r 00. . u I m s a h a o 1 ON l 04 l Om J Om 0.3 39060.: 30020 3.89:3. 3320 109 .m .< 1%) AIIAIIOV BAIIV '138 52 Figure 4. Comparison of pH optima for activity (A) and stability (B) of glucose isomerase, amylase, and B-galactosidase. Enzyme activities were assayed with cell extracts in 100 mM glycylglycine hydrochloride (H), sodium acetate (El—Cl), and sodium phosphate (O-O) buffers. Residual activity was measured (B) after treatment at 60°C for l h. 53 :23 In ox ow 0.0 or Own ON. O..O_ O.m p 1 :23 :e ow owe 0d Qv Oem b - 30336200 -Q omolE< h d omon_no.uo_oo-m P 301:3 h .- 10m 100_ ON Ov Ow Om OO_ $03602 3320 380602 .3820 1 OO_ . < (°/e)AJ_1/\I_LDV BAIIVWBU 54 isomerase and the apparent pH optima were between 5.0-5.5 and 6.0-6.5, respectively. The stability of these enzymes in relation to pH was examined by measuring residual activities after incubation for 1 h at 60°C at different pH values (Figure 4B). Under these assay conditions, glucose isomerase, amylase, and B-galactosidase activities were stable at pH 6.0-7.5, pH 5.5-7.0, and pH 5.5-7.0, respectively. All the saccharidase activities were stable and displayed at least 60% of maximal activity at pH 6.0. Single Step Conversion of Starch or Lactose into Fructose Syrups The feasibility of using Thermoanaerobacter saccharidases in a single step enzymatic process for producing fructose syrups from liquefied starch or whey-lactose was examined using a crude extract of xylose grown Thermoanaerobacter cells which contained environmentally compatible saccharidases. Figure 5 depicts a typical time course for production of monosaccharides from starch or lactose using a single step process with Thermoanaerobacter saccharidases at 60°C. More than 90% of the starch or lactose was hydrolyzed into glucose mixtures within 4 h while the isomerization of glucose into fructose approached equilibrium by the end of incubation ' period (20-48 h). An unknown oligosaccharide, putatively allolactose, was produced at the early stages of lactose conversion and was slowly degraded into monomers. Allolactose is a reversion product formed by B-galactosidase activity. Table 3 compares the influences of specific reaction condition changes on the final saccharide product ratio achieved during single step conversion of starch and lactose by Thermoanaerobacter saccharidases. During enzymatic starch conversion, 55 Figure 5. Single step conversion of starch (A) and lactose (B) into a fructose mixture by a Thermoanaerobacter enzyme preparation. 5% maltodexuin (A) and 5% lactose (B) were incubated with cell extract at 60°C in 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer at pH 6.0 and 6.5, respectively. Socchoride Conversion (°/e) Soccnoride Conversion (°/e) 56 A. STARCH 100 80 o-Storch 1 GI 60‘: o . . '/ ”cf-3.: '. ' V T" l . I ' . 4O . . a ‘ \Fructose 20", . . \ Oligomers IO 20 30 4O 50 Time (hrs) 8. LACTOSE logr rL 501‘; ,1 ‘,-—Loctose 40‘— \ Goloctosc 3. / \ Q 30~ \ ‘ / Glucose ~ G; 20 ‘ ‘ Fructose / Allolactose i0 ‘~~~\-.T‘W - Ks. _____ ‘T‘N. ~~~~~~~~~~~ _. o--- - 1— i 4 - - ---——t-~‘ IO 20 3O 4O 50 Time ( hrs ) 57 Table 3. Effect of reaction conditions on the final monosaccharide product ratio during a starch or lactose conversion process with a Thermoanaerobacter enzyme preparation.‘ Substrate Concenuation pH Temperature Conversion Final Product (w/v) % (°C) Yield (%)" Ratio‘ (Glc:Frc) Liquefied starch 5 6.0 60 92 53:47 6.0 65 93 5 1:49 6.0 70 96 49:5 1 20 6.0 60 . 84 58:42 20 6.0 70 9 1 5 1:49 (GalzGlczFrc) Lactose 5 6.4 60 85 40:3 1 :29 6.8 60 81 40:31:29 6.8 65 76 35:33:32 20 6.4 60 75 36:33:31 ‘Cell extract (5 mg and 10 mg/ml of reaction vol.) prepared from xylose grown cells was added into the reaction mixture containing 5% and 20% substrate, respectively. Maltodextlin (DE 10) was used as a liquefied starch. ”Total amount of monosaccharides hydrolyzed from the substrate. cRelative ratio between monosaccharides was measured after 48 hours incubation under the given reaction conditions. 58 a higher sweetener concentration ratio for fructose to glucose and a higher yield of starch conversion into monosaccharides were achieved at 70°C than at 60°C. Liquefied starch was used here but equivalent results were obtained with soluble starch and the saccharidase preparation also hydrolyzed raw starch (data not shown). The highest sweetener conversion (fructose-51 to glucose-49) was achieved at pH 6.0 and 70°C from 5% (w/v) maltodextrin with a final conversion yield of 96%. Enzymatic hydrolysis of 5% lactose at pH 6.8 versus 6.4 lowered the total conversion yield of lactose, but did not affect the final product ratio between galactose, glucose, and fructose. Enzymatic hydrolysis of 20% lactose at 65°C versus 60°C lowered both the lactose conversion yield and the galactose concentration in the final products. DISCUSSION To our best knowledge, these findings represent the first reported studies on the general physicochemical properties and regulation of glucose isomerase from a thermophilic microorganism. Although thermophilicity is required in industrial glucose isomerase, thermostable enzymes produced by mesophilic bacteria have been examined as principal indusuial sources (4). Furthermore, these studies represent the first demonstration that a saccharidase mixture produced by a single microorganism can be used to directly process starch or lactose into a fructose sweetener. Several previous studies have demonstrated that glucoamylase and glucose isomerase mixtures from different microbes can process oligodexuins into fructose syrups with marginal success because of enzyme pH and thermal incompatibilities (10, 13). Regulation of amylase and xylanase activities in Thermoanaerobacter strain B6A is different from the inducible and glucose catabolite repressed synthesis of amylase activities reported in C. thermosulfltrogenes and C. thermohydrosulfuricum (14-16). Thermostable B-galactosidase has been previously reported in aerobic Thermus species; however, enzyme synthesis is regulated by induction and glucose catabolite repression. On the other hand, the B-galactosidase of Thermoanaerobacter strain B6A is constitutive and non-catabolite repressible. As expected of enzymes from thermophiles, the apparent optimum temperatures for glucose isomerase (75-80°C), glucogenic amylases (70°C), and B—galactosidase (65°C) in crude extracts were relatively high. The reported temperature optima of glucose isomerases from other microorganisms vary with enzyme source, they range 59 60 from 45°C to 90°C (5). The temperature optima of glucogenic amylase activities reported in Clostridium thermohydrosulfuricum (13) was similar to those in Thermoanaerobacter. The temperature optima of B-galactosidases range from 35°C to the high of 80°C reported in Thermus strains (6,9). Analysis of Thermoanaerobacter saccharidase therrnostabilities showed that more than 95% of glucose isomerase, glucogenic amylases, and B-galactosidase were retained after 60 min incubation at 85°C, 70°C, and 60°C. The pH optima for glucose isomerase, glucoamylase, and B-galactosidase are generally between 7.0 to 8.5, 4.5 to 5.5, and 4.5 to 7.5, respectively (5,14,9). Although the apparent pH optima for Thermoanaerobacter glucose isomerase, B- galactosidase, and glucogenic amylase activities fall in this range, all three enzymes were stable and active at pH 6.0-6.5 and 60°C. The glucose isomerase displayed the least acid stability and activity of the saccharidases studied. In a separate report (manuscript submitted) we purified the Thermoanaerobacter glucose isomerase to homogeneity and showed that the 200,000 MW tetrarner has pH and thermal properties identical to those reported here. Thus, we conclude here that the rapid destruction of glucose isomerase activity in non-pH controlled xylose fermentation is due to enzyme instability at the low pH values and high temperature of stationary phase cultures. The difference in pH optima or temperature stability of these saccharidases has been a major problem in demonstrating the feasibility of a single step process for conversion of starch or lactose to fructose mixtures. The present study indicates that saccharidases simultaneously produced by Thermoanaerobacter are environmentally 61 compatible at pH 6.0 and 60°C and can be used coordinately in a single step conversion process for production of fructose sweetener from starch or milk derived subsuates. The final ratios between glucose and fructose during the single step conversion process from starch at various temperatures were very similar to the theoretical values at equilibrium of the glucose isomerization reaction (1,17). The maximum percent of starch conversion from liquefied starch during this process was also very similar to the values (94-96% of dextrose) after starch saccharification in the multistep commercial processes (1). The Thermoanaerobacter saccharidase preparation could be operated at 70°C to achieve the higher equilibrium concenu'ations of fructose and faster reaction rates than those practiced in indusuial processes. If reduced to practice, a single step starch hydrolysis process at high temperature (>60°C) and acid pH (-— 68% —-J A mpullariella 162 isomerase contains two cysteine residues, at positions of 99 and 158, whereas the thermolabile enzyme of B. subtilis type contains only one cysteine residue at amino acid position 158 of the enzyme (Figure 5). The Cys,9 of C. thermosulfurogenes enzyme was, therefore, changed, by site-directed mutagenesis, to alanine which is present in at the corresponding site in the B. subtilis enzyme. This substitution, however, did not affect either the thermostability or specific activity of the C. thermosulfurogenes enzyme. Moreover, treatment with a reducing agent (25 mM dithiothreitol) did not affect the specific activity of the wild-type enzyme (Table 2, and results not shown). If we consider, in addition, the fact that thermoresistant enzymes from ' S. violaceoniger and Arthrobacter each contain only one cysteine residue and the Ampullariella enzyme contains no cysteine we have to conclude that, in these xylose isomerase molecules, disulfide bonds do not contribute significantly to the compactness of the molecule which is generally considered to be a requirement for protein thermostability. Another feature believed to contribute significantly to thermostability of proteins is the number and distribution of hydrophobic regions in the molecule (40). We have, therefore, compared the predicted hydrophobicity profiles of the Clostridium, B. subtilis and S. violaceoniger enzymes using the method of Kyte and Doolittle (39). The results, presented in Figure 7, indicated that the thermostable enzyme from S. violaceoniger contained fewer hydrophobic regions than did the thermostable enzyme from Clostridium, which in turn, exhibited a very similar hydrophobicity profile to that of the thermolabile enzyme from B. subtilis. These results argue against the general idea that enzyme thermostability relates to the compactness of the native 163 Figure 7. Comparison of hydropathy profiles of xylose isomerases from C. thermosulfurogenes (C.t.), B. subtilis (B.S.), and S. violaceoniger (S.v.). The deduced amino acid sequences were analyzed by the method of Kyte and Doolittle (39) with a computer program MSEQ, University of Michigan (42) using a window size of 7-residues. The hydrophobic regions have a positive hydropathy index score and appear above the central dotted line. Amino acid numbers refer to the sequence of C. thermosulfurogenes enzyme. Asterisks indicate the regions where the hydropathy profile is significantly different between C. thermosulfurogenes and S. violaceoniger enzymes. 164 $253: Eon oEE< ovv oov omn oon omu cow om? cop om 4 9? \, ., 22,. ... s I. _ lflfibflbk§§$WWfi7>Pg>%.J/Ipf:w>/\\52Glnm; wt, wild-type; Ctr, E.coli HB101 carrying the vector plasmid without inserts; Mr, molecular weight standards (97,400, phosphorylase; 66,200, bovine serum albumin; 42,700, ovalbumin; 31,000, carbonic anhydrase; 21,500, soybean trypsin inhibitor). The arrow indicates the polypeptide band corresponding to the wild-type xylose isomerase. (B) (A) 5 Mr wt 4 3 5Mr 2 wt Ctr 1 97.000 — 168 \ 112,700-— — 51 000\ - 21.500 \_ / ”ill t- at "Ill'l' .1 ‘ Jame: HUI-ea: I ; WWII: 4 118.18! 4 169 Table 2. Comparison of site-directed mutant glucose isomerase activities in E. coli carrying different alleles of C. thermosulfurogenes xylA gene. Preparation of cell extracts, enzyme purification, and glucose isomerase assay for each mutant and wild-type enzyme was performed as described in Materials and Methods. Specific Activity (unit/mg)' Enzyme Cell Extract Purified Enzyme Wild-type 0.32 (1.00) 3.7 (1.00) His - Phe41 0.33 (1.03) 3.6 (0.97) His - Phe“ 0.36 (1.12) 4.0 (1.08) His - Phe,,2 0.31 (0.97) 3.2 (0.86) His - Phew, 0.00 (0.00) ' 0.0 (0.00) His - Glnw, 0.03 (0.09) 0.4 (0.11) Cys - Ala,9 0.34 (1.06) 3.7 (1.00) ‘ Fraction of specific activity relative to wild-type is given in parenthesis. 170 glucose isomerase, although only a fraction of specific activity of the wild-type enzyme was retained (Table 2 and 4). In the second experiment, the effect of diethylpyrocarbonate, known to inhibit enzymes containing histidine as a catalytic residue by covalent modification of the imidazole moiety (19), on specific activities of wild-type and mutant enzymes was determined. As shown in Table 3, the enzymes containing histidine at the position 101 were strongly inhibited by 1 mM DEPC, whereas the Gln1m mutant enzyme was not inhibited even by 10 mM DEPC. The results of these experiments indicate that His1m is essential for the catalytic activity of C. thermosulfurogenes xylose isomerase. Moreover, they are consistent with the proposed catalytic mechanism of the isomerization reaction that involves a general base catalysis mediated by imidazole moiety of a specific histidine of xylose isomerase (Hisml in this enzyme). Kinetic properties of the wild-type and mutant enzymes are compared in Table 4. The apparent K. values for glucose did not change significantly upon substitution of His1m by glutamine. This indicated that this histidine residue is not essential for substrate binding. The apparent V“, of the Gln101 mutant enzyme was changed to a different extent for xylose, glucose, and fructose. However, the Phe“n mutant ' enzyme showed no activity with either of these substrates (Table 4). We conclude, therefore, that the same amino acid residue (Hism) is involved in the catalytic reaction for each of these three substrates. It should be noted that the ratio of apparent maximal velocities for the fructose to glucose conversion was 2.4-fold higher than that obtained with the wild-type enzyme. It is possible that the position of the functional group of glutamine, in the folded molecule of the enzyme, is closer to the Cl atom 171 Table 3. Effect of diethylpyrocarbonate (DEPC) on glucose isomerase activity of the wild-type and site-directed mutant enzymes. Purified enzymes (80 11g for wild-type and His-Phe” mutant enzyme and 800 11g for His-Gln101 mutant enzyme) in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) were incubated with DEPC at room temperature for 30 min. The residual glucose isomerase activity was assayed as described in Materials and Methods and expressed as percentage of specific activity found in the control without DEPC. Residual Activity (%) Enzyme 0 mM DEPC 1 mM DEPC 10 mM DEPC Wild-type 100 8 1 His - Phe“ 100 10 3 His - Gln1m 100 100 100 172 Table 4. Comparison of kinetic properties of site-directed mutant and wild-type xylose isomerases Enzyme activities with each substrate were determined with purified enzymes at various substrate concentrations as described under Materials and Methods. Apparent Km and V“ values were obtained from Lineweaver-Burk plot. K,I (mM) Vmax (unigmg) Ratio of Vm Enzyme Glucose Xylose Glucose Fructose (Frc/Glc) Wild-type 142 14.0 5.3 2.9 0.55 His - Phen 130 14.9 5.5 3.3 0.60 His - Phe”.2 152 16.2 5.2 2.9 0.56 His - Pheml n.d. 0.0 0.0 0.0 n.d. His - Gln101 138 1.6 0.6 0.8 1.33 n.d. Not Deterrninable 173 of the substrate than the imidazole residue of the Hism. This assumption may be verified when the information on three-dimensional structure of the Gln1m enzyme becomes available. Dependence of kinetic parameters on pH for glucose isomerization of the wild- type and Gln101 mutant enzymes were determined over the pH range of 5.0 to 10.0. The plot of log Vmax“, versus pH indicated that the apparent pKa values of the catalytic residues in the wild-type enzyme were approximately 6.0 and 9.4, whereas the Gln,“ mutant enzyme displayed only one detectible pKa value at 9.4 (Figure 9). Although the apparent pKa value of an amino acid residue in an enzyme may be affected by its micro-environment (e.g. neighboring amino acid residues or ions), the estimated pKa value of 6.0 may represent the apparent pKa of the imidazole moiety of the His1m of the wild-type enzyme. Therefore, the observed changes of the enzyme activity at pH below 7.0 may be due to the different status of protonation of the imidazole moiety in the Hism, which would affect the nucleophilicity of this functional group. On the other hand, the amino and carbonyl groups of the glutamine side chain are not protonable over the physiological pH range, and the potential nucleophilic property of these groups is not expected to be altered by the change of pH from 8.0 to 5.0. We have not yet definitely ruled out the possibility that the changes in enzymatic activity, reported in this paper, might be due to structural changes in the catalytic site, resulting from the introduction of strongly hydrophobic residue, phenylalanine, in place of Hislol and that glutamine simply played a role of a more hydrophilic substitution than phenylalanine. However, based on the existing 174 , Figure 9. Plot of relative log of apparent Vm versus pH for Glnm mutant (H) and wild type (O—-0) xylose isomerases. Apparent V“, values at different pH were determined from Lineweaver-Burk plots. The scale of relative log Vmax“. indicates the fraction of each experimental value at different pH relative to the maximal value. 175 I 10.0 8.0 6.0 5.0 1 O. ‘0. O ‘ddOXDulA 50'] engtolaa 0. O 176 crystallographic data and on results on comparing the amino acid sequence and properties of sixmutant xylose isomerases including their inhibition by DEPC and the change of activity at different pH values, we favor the interpretation forwarded in this paper that Hism, is the amino acid that acts as a general base catalysts in the active site of the C. thermosulfurogenes xylose isomerase. Further studies are required to understand the mechanism of isomerase activity at acidic pH values including additional site specific amino acid changes and three-dimensional structure analysis of the modified molecules. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. REFERENCES Takasaki, Y., Kosugi, Y., and Kanbayashi, A. (1969) Arg. Biol. Chem. 33, 1527-1534 Antrim, R.L., Colliala, W., and Schnyder, B. (1979) in Applied Biochemistry and Bioengineering (Wingard, L.B., ed) pp. 97-155, Academic Press, New York Bucke, C. (1980) in Enzymes and Food Processing (Birch, G.G., Blackebrough, N., and Parker, J.K., ed) pp. 51-72, Applied Science Publishers, London Chen, W. (1980) Process Biochem. 15, 30-35 Chen, W. (1980) Process Biochem. 15, 36—41 Carrell, H.L., Rubin, B.H., Hurley, T.J., and Glusker, JP. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 3230-3236 Farber, G.K., Petsko, G.A., and Ringe, D. (1987) Protein Engineering 1, 459-466 Rey, F., Jenkins, J., Janin, J., Lasters, I., Alard, P., Claessens, M., Matthyssens, G., Wodak, S. (1988) Proteins 4, 165-172 Dauter, Z., Dauter, M., Hemker, J., Witzel, H., and Wilson, K. (1989) FEBS Letters 7, 1-8 Batt, C.A., Claps, M.C., Bodis, M.S., Jamas, S., and Sinskey, AJ. (1985) Can. J. Microbiol. 31, 930-933 Wilhelm, M., and Hollenberg, GP. (1984) EMBO Journal 3, 2555-2560 Shamanna, D.K., and Sanderson, KB. (1979) J. Bacteriol. 139, 71-79 Schellenberg, G.D., Sarthy, A., Larson, A.E., Backer, M.P., Crabb, J .W., Lidstrom, M., Hall, B.D., and Furlong, CE. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 6826-6832 Wilhelm, M., and Hollenberg, GP. (1985) Nucleic Acids Res. 13, 5717- 5723 Saari, G.C., Kumar, A.A., Kawasaki, G.H., Insley, M.Y., and O’Hara, 177 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 178 R]. (1987) J. Bacteriol. 169, 612-618 Drocourt, D., Bejar, S., Calmels, T., Reynes, J.P., and Tiraby, G. (1988) Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 9337 Rose, I.A., O’Connell, E.L., and Mortlock, RP. (1969) Biochem. Biophys. Acta 178, 376-379 Suckling, KB. (1985) in Comprehensive Biotechnology (Moo-Young, M., Bull, A., and Dalton, H. ed) vol.1, pp. 539-551, Pergamon Press, Oxford Gaikwad, S.M., More, M.W., Vartak, H.G., and Deshpande, V.V. (1988) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 155, 270-277 Carrell, H.L., Glusker, J.P., Burger, V., Manfre, F., Tritsch, D., and Biellmann, J.-F. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, 4440-4444 Henrick, K., Collyer, C.A., and Blow D.M. (1989) J. Mol. Biol. 208, 129-157 Boyer, H.W., and Roulland-Dussoix, D. (1969) J. Mol. Biol. 41, 459- 472 Yanisch-Perron, C., Vieira, J., and Messing, J. (1985) Gene 33, 103- 119. Marinus, M.G., and Konrad, EB. (1976) Mol. Gen. Genet. 149, 273-277 Marinus, M.G., and Konrad, EB. (1976) Mol. Gen. Genet. 149, 273- 277 Fiirste, J.P., Pansegrau, W., Frank, R., Blocker, H., Scholz, P., Bagdasarian, M., and Lanka E. (1986) Gene 48, 119-131 Poncs, M., Solowiejczyk, D., Ballantine, M., Schwartz, E., and Surry, S. (1982) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79 4298-4302 Birnboim, H.C., and Doly, J. (1979) Nucleic Acids Res. 7, 1513-1523 Maniatis, T., Fritsch, E.E., and Sambrook, J. (1982) in Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. Sanger, F., Nicklen, S., and Coulson, AR. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74, 5463-5467 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 179 Devereux, I., Haeberli, P., and Smithies, O. (1984) Nucleic Acids Res. 12, 387-395 Sayers, J.R., Schmidt, W., and Eckstein, F., (1988) Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 791-802 Dishe, Z., and Borenfreund, E. (1951) J. Biol. Chem. 192, 583-587 Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N.J., Farr, A.I., and Randall, R.J. (1951) J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265-275 Stormo, G.D., Schneider, T.D., and Gold, L. (1982) Nucleic Acids Res. 10, 2971-2996 McLaughlin, J.R., Murray, C.L., and Rabinowitz, J.C. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256, 11283-11291 Harley, CB, and Reynolds, RP. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 2343- 2361 Moran, C.P., Lang, N., LeGrice, S.F., Lee, G., Stephens, M., Sonenshein, A.L., Pero, J., and Losick, R. (1982) Mol. Gen. Genet. 186, 339-346 Huang, J.J., and Ho, W..Y (1985) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 126, 1154- 1160 Kyte, J., and Doolittle, R.F. (1982) J. Mol. Biol. 157, 105-132 Kitamoto, N., Yamagata, H., Kato, T., Tsukagoshi, N., and Udaka, S. (1988) J. Bacteriol. 170, 5848-5854 Brady, G., Jantzen, H.M., Bernard, H.U., Brown, R., Hashimoto-Gotoh, T., and Schlitz, G. (1984) Gene 27, 223-232 Black, S.D., and Glorioso, J.C. (1986) Biotechniques 4, 448-460 Laemmli, U.K. (1970) Nature (London) 227, 680-685 Chapter VI CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES 180 CONCLUSIONS The studies described in this thesis on thermostable glucose isomerases of the thermoanaerobes Thermoanaerobacter strain B6A and Clostridium thermosulfurogenes broaden knowledge and information on the following topics: physicochemical properties and regulation of glucose isomerase in thermoanaerobes; potential applications of these thermostable glucose isomerases in novel sweetener production processes; molecular and genetic features of the glucose isomerase gene from thermoanaerobic bacteria; catalytic function of histidine in the active site during glucose isomerization; and site directed alteration of kinetic and catalytic properties of glucose isomerase by protein engineering. Most investigations on the production and biochemical characterization of glucose isomerase have concentrated on mesophilic, aerobic microorganisms. Glucose isomerase is the most expensive commercial saccharidase used in sweetener production from starch, and the current industrial process can be improved with an enzyme that possess higher thermostability and higher activity at acidic pH. Therefore, the present studies were initiated to advance fundamental understanding about the - biochemical and physiological properties of glucose isomerase of thermoanaerobic bacteria and the molecular mechanisms that account for enzymatic catalysis and thermostability. ‘ Initially, two different types of glucose isomerase activities were identified in diverse thermoanaerobic species based on differences in their apparent pH Optima. Thermoanaerobacter and C. thermosulfurogenes which produced cell-bound, 181 182 thermostable glucose isomerases with neutral pH optima for activity were selected as model microorganisms for further studies. Thermoanaerobacter constitutively produced glucogenic amylase and B-galactosidase activities which were environmentally compatible (i.e. active and stable at low pH and high temperature) with glucose isomerase activity. These findings made it possible to design a new sweetener production process that directly converted starch or lactose into a fructose sweetener by using a saccharidase mixture produced simultaneously by Thermoanaerobacter. This novel single step process represents a very efficient sweetener production system because it can eliminate the need for multiple steps and enzymes in the conventional starch process, and solve the digestion problems of lactase deficient individuals by hydrolysis of lactose into sweetener when used in dairy products. The utility of this single step process for industrial sweetener production requires further investigation on enzyme immobilization, continuous reaction system development, improvement of enzyme activity and stability at low pH, and other studies on enzyme production cost and safety. Biochemical properties of glucose isomerases purified from Thermoanaerobacter and C. thermosulfurogenes were characterized in detail. The two distinct thermoanaerobic bacterial species produced highly thermostable glucose isomerases with close similarity in physicochemical and catalytic properties. These findings suggest that glucose isomerases from species with a common phylogenic origin have not diversified dramatically during their evolution under the similar conditions in thermal hot spring ecosystems. At present, the molecular mechanism of thermophilicity in their glucose isomerase is not clear and remains to be solved. 183 However, further studies on three dimensional structure of the enzyme and protein modification via site directed mutagenesis may be able to answer the questions. The gene coding for thermostable glucose isomerase of C. thermosulfurogenes was cloned and overproduced in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis using its original promoter. It is worth noting that a hyper-expression vector system by using the promoter of the C. thermosulfurogenes was deve10ped in mesophilic B. subtilis or E. coli hosts. Production of thermostable glucose isomerase in a meSOphilic host was of particular interest in simplifying large scale purification of the enzyme by a simple heat treatment procedure. Thus, these findings suggest the potential of utilizing the recombinant thermostable glucose isomerase over-expressed in a food microorganism B. subtilis as an industrial enzyme for sweetener production. Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequence analysis of the cloned glucose isomerase gene advanced insights on the primary structure of thermophilic glucose isomerases. Comparison of amino acid composition of glucose isomerases and substitution of several amino acid residues in the C. thermosulfurogenes enzyme molecule indicated that the factors which determine protein thermostability are the three dimensional coordination of key amino acids involved in the formation and ~ maintenance of the protein structure; and, not simply the presence of disulfide bonds or the number of hydrophobic bonds which can be predicted from the primary structure of the native molecule. Glucose isomerases that share extensive homology, but differ significantly in thermostability, such as those from B. subtilis and C. thermosulfurogenes seem to be excellent models for further investigation in determining the molecular mechanisms of protein thermophilicity. 184 Moreover, the catalytic residue in the active site of C. thermosulfurogenes glucose isomerase was identified by homology analysis with other glucose isomerase amino acid sequences in relation to their three dimensional structure predicted from X-ray crystallographic studies. Histidine was demonstrated to function in catalysis by site directed mutagenesis, and by redesigning the catalytic site of the enzyme molecule to contain glutamine in lieu of histidine, a thermostable glucose isomerase with acid stable activity was obtained. Further studies including additional site specific amino acid changes and three-dimensional structure analysis of the modified molecules are required to understand the exact chemical mechanism of isomerase activity at acidic pH values or to further improve enzyme substrate specificity and activity. In ending, the results on biochemical and molecular characterization of glucose isomerase completed in this thesis will serve as a basis to start assessing the industrial applications of both the native and site-specifically engineered glucose isomerases developed here. In addition, the glucose isomerase gene and the engineered enzyme production system can serve as a model system for future research aiming at understanding the molecular mechanism of glucose isomerase catalysis and thermostability, and also for providing a rationale basis to redesign the molecule for property improvements by protein engineering. Hopefully, the present report on cloning, crystallization, and determination of the primary structure of a thermostable glucose isomerase will also be useful for the continuation of basic studies on understanding enzyme therrnophilicity in relation to its three dimensional structure.