‘ v LJ‘If. .A a. ‘9; ‘ VN W9 41!: 00:.) e 5533‘ H“. v.40- » . .- 4' ,; VH-OEW‘ " ¢ in“ “In" -174“ ( “V .Véthf ‘ 2??” """11v‘m ‘: , '- I .. ‘ ', I- I t 0" My}: . " '~ 1. « ‘6‘”3‘r‘4‘fi‘. , :.\.tv 4 ‘I‘ N L 1"” “4/.- ~' Ark. “fix; ‘1‘». “gag“; 12*} x1???" ,.>/.; 1‘" '1' ”5. ‘ ‘ "l I“ r)": -.; ., ‘ ‘, .335. 5,15%?! .. ' >1"‘x‘(#tav n l k ' D ' V?“ “N v ~\ 352:3, A“) V l a v - +- _ A _ Jfifi'm‘fizj." Mans - v‘ ’V. ' I 1» ., ””‘X: ‘ ,‘él‘l‘73«".1‘~, I . .1 ‘ I (/13 .J K fa}! '- 44'; “'4: .‘t ‘L vdqy: ?.‘_ 5“ "Y‘F' un‘ 4 f4 ‘.2 1 zoo Eaa mm a 6:80 88:82 a . .9580 e. 2 _U 1.. (Iw/bn)° LE501 6| 24 restricted and ad lib controls from wk 4 to wk 12 (p<0.05). Serum IgG was also significantly decreased (p<0.01) in the 25 restricted group when it is compared to the ad lib control from wk 4 to wk 12. This indicates that depressed IgG and IgM levels could result from decreased feed intake whereas the elevated IgA was a specific DON-related effect. The potent effect of 25 ppm DON on serum immunoglobulin was replicated in a later experiment (Table 4). This experiment (exp 5) contained a greater number of replicates for statistical power than the previous 25 ppm experiment. These animals also served as sources of spleens for the in m experiments which will be discussed later. Here the 25 ppm DON group was significantly elevated (p<0.01) when compared to the restricted and ad lib control groups at weeks 4 through 12. The DON treatment group after 12 weeks had a serum IgA concentration that was elevated over 4-fold relative to the ad lib control. A fourth study (Exp 6) was initiated that measured the long term effects of exposure to 25 ppm DON. Table 8 presents the serum IgA concentrations following 6 months of 25 ppm DON exposure. The 25 ppm DON and ad lib control groups were present as controls for the cholera toxin experiments which will be discussed in the antigen specific section. The 25 ppm DON group was significantly elevated (p<0.01) from week 4 to week 24. Serum IgA concentrations steadily increased over time (Fig 3). After 24 weeks the 25 ppm DON group was elevated over 17-fold relative to the ad 1 ib control. 25 Table 4. Serum IgA concentration in mice following dietary exposure to 25 ppm DON b ISA Losmws/ml) Treatment wk 0 wk 4 wk 8 wk 12 25 ppm 0011 2.80 z 0.15 3.00 z 0.13“ 3.22 : 0.57.d 3.38 : 0.23.5d 25 Restricted 2.75 s 0.07 2.72 s 0.08 2.69 s 0.04 2.89 z 0.09 ad lib control 2.78 s 0.11 2.76 s 0.09 2.68 s 0.08 2.77 s 0.09 aNice were fed 25 ppm DON in AlN-76A diet for 8 weeks. (Exp 5) bData shown are geometric mean 2 standard deviation for groups of 11 ad lib control, 12 treated, and 11 restricted control mice. Difference between treatment and ad lib control determined by Dunnett's t test, and difference between treatment and restricted controls determined by the improved Bonferroni t test. cSignificantly different than restricted control (p<0.01). dSignificantly different than ad lib control (ps0.01). 26 Figure 3. Serum IgA following long term dietary DON exposure. Mice were fed 25 ppm DON in AIN-76A diet for 24 weeks. Data shown are geometric means (ug/ml) : S.D. for groups of 13 mice. Difference between treatment and ad lib control group determined.by Dunnettfls t test. Treatment and control groups are significantly different from week 4 to week 24 (p<0.01). 27 em ON m? 9.33 NP m e al. zoo 5% mm .1... 6.5.50 olllo (um/5n) 015.. WI 28 Salivary IgA concentrations in mice following dietary deoxynivalenol exposure. Since IgA serves a critical role as a mucosal immunoglobulin, it was of interest to know the salivary IgA concentrations following exposure to this dietary antigen. The immunoglobulin concentrations were measured in the saliva of Exp. 1 animals following 2 and 10 ppm dietary DON and are presented in Table 5. The 2 ppm DON group was significantly elevated (p<0.05) compared to its restricted control after 6 weeks of feeding. The 2 and 10 ppm DON groups were elevated relative to their restricted and ad lib controls at weeks 2, and 8 but were not significant due to the large amount of variation. The effect of dietary DON on total and antigen-specific serum immunoglobulin response. Two studies were performed to determine if dietary DON could increase the antigen-specific IgA concentrations using cholera toxin and casein. Cholera toxin has been found to be an extremely potent immunogen for mucosal IgA responses when administered orally (Elson and Ealding, 1984). Casein was the protein source in the AIN-76A diet that the animals received for the duration of the study. In the first antigen challenge study (Exp 3), mice were fed 10 ppm DON for 14 days and then orally challenged with 10 ug of cholera toxin. Animals were continued on the DON diet and boosted with 10 ug cholera toxin on days 28 and 41. At day 48, animals were sacrificed and serum and intestinal contents were collected. Table 6 presents the serum IgA concentrations in mice following 10 ppm DON and cholera toxin 29 Table 5. Salivary IgA concentration in mice following dietary exposure to 2 and 10 ppm DON.a b IgA L09 (US/ml) 10 Treatment wk 2 wk 4 wk 6 wk 8 2 ppm DON 1.09 s 0.36 (182) 0.77 s 0.35 (105) 1.05 s 0.326(195) 1.15 s 0.43 (129) 2 Restricted 0.86 s 0.37 (107) 0.64 a 0.40 (78) 0.75 s 0.30c(98) 0.91 s 0.25 (74) 10 ppm DON 0.95 s 0.36 (132) 0.74 s 0.32 (98) 0.79 s 0.32 (107) 1.09 s 0.21 (112) 10 Restricted _ 0.77 s 0.32 (87) 0.52 s 0.15 (59) 0.74 s 0.34 (95) 0.94 s 0.31 (79) ad lib control 0.83 z 0.24 0.75 a 0.27 0.76 s 0.30 1.04 s 0.36 aD6C3F1 treatment mice were fed 2 or 10 ppm DON in AlN-76A diet. (Exp 1) bData shown are geometric mean 2 standard deviation for groups of 22 control and 10 treated mice. Numbers in parentheses are (ratio of means of treatment to ad lib) x 100. Difference between treatment groups and ad lib control determined by Dunnett's t test. Difference between treatment groups and their restricted controls determined by the improved Bonferroni t test. - cGroups with identical letters are significantly different (p<0.05). 30 Table 6. Serum IgA in mice following exposure to 10 ppm DON and oral cholera toxin challenge. b 1911 1.0910 (us/ml) —v Treatment Day 0 Day 14 Day 35 Day 41 Day 48 ad lib control 2.72 s 0.07 2.71 s 0.10 2.68 s 0.05 2.68 z 0.11 2.74 s 0.08 10 ppm 0011 2.69 a 0.08 2.79 : 0.10° 2.79 : 0.15c 2.77 s 0.12 2.77 z 0.05 cholera control 2.68 e 0.09 2.68 s 0.05 2.75 s 0.06 2.70 a 0.09 2.85 s 0.15 cholera-10 ppm DON 2.74 s 0.08 2.82 s 0.89d 2.81 s 0.14 2.70 s 0.12 2.89 s 0.15 w 'Nice were fed 10 ppm DON DON in ATN-76A diet for 48 days. Cholera toxin treatment animals were gavaged with 10 ug cholera toxin at day 14, and boosted on days 28, and 41. (Exp 3) bData shown are geometric mean values a standard deviation for groups of 13 control, 12 10 ppm, 10 cholera control, and 15 cholera-10 ppm DON mice. Difference between treatment and control groups determined by Dunnett's t test. Difference between treatment groups and their matched controls determined by the Bonferronit test. cSignificantly different than ad lib control (p<0.05). d Significantly different than matched cholera toxin control (p<0.05). 31 challenge. Unfortunately the DON effect on serum IgA was minimal in this experiment. The 10 ppm DON group was significantly increased (p<0.05) relative to the ad lib control at days 14 and 35. IgA concentrations in the cholera- 10 ppm DON group were higher (p<0.01) than the ad lib control at days 14,35, and 48 and higher than the cholera control at day 14 (p<0.05). Table 7 presents the intestinal IgA concentrations ‘following 10 ppm DON and cholera toxin challenge. Intestinal IgA concentrations were higher in the cholera-10 ppm DON group than the cholera control however this increase was not significant due to the large amount of variation. Serum.IgA concentrations were measured in mice that were fed 25 ppm DON and challenged with cholera toxin (Exp 6). Mice were fed DON for 5 weeks and then challenged with cholera toxin at wk 5, and boosted at weeks 7, and 21. Table 8 reveals that serum IgA was elevated (p<0.01) in the cholera-DON group relative to the cholera control and to the ad lib control at weeks 4, 8, and 12. Cholera challenge alone did not significantly alter the total serum IgA concentration, nor did it act synergistically with DON to increase the serum IgA concentration. Cholera toxin and casein-specific serum IgA were measured in the 25 ppm DON-cholera toxin experiment (Exp 6). Table 9 and Fig. 4 present the ELISA titers for cholera toxin -specific IgA at weeks 8 and 21. Cholera toxin-specific antibody was measured at week 20 for the ad lib control and 25 ppm DON group, and at week 22 for the cholera toxin and 32 Table 7. Total intestinal 19A of mice following dietary DON and oral cholera toxin challenge. b IgA Log1otug/ml) Treatment control 10 ppm DON cholera control cholera-10 ppm DON 4— Day 48 1.29 s 0.48 1.22 s 0.39 1.13 s 0.53 1.39 s 0.44 ___V_ .Mice were fed 10 ppm DON in AlN-76 diet for 48 days. Cholera toxin treatment animals were gavaged with 10 ug cholera toxin on day 14, and boosted on days 28, and 41. (Exp 3) b Data shown are geometric mean a standard deviation for groups of 13 control, 12 10 ppm, 10 cholera control, and 15 cholera-10 ppm DON mice. Difference between groups determined by Student's t test. 33 .n_o.ovov LOLDCOu c_xou oco.o:u vacuums cog» ucocoe~_p >.ucmu_~_cm_mp .Apo.ovov .ocucoo am. pm cozy ucoeoemmp xducnu_e_cu_mo .umou u mecccuecom one >9 poc_scouop n.0cucou vacuums emery use museum ucosuaocu coosuoo oucococemo .umou u mtuuoccso >o poc_scouop «ocean docucou pea ucosumecu cassava eucocoewmo .ou_s on we poum_mcou quota zoo sod mm neodogu .oume n— so museum Lee comua_>op pumUCmum « Coos umcuosoou ace czocm sumo o no oxmv..- can .5 axes: um poumooo pea .m xoos us c_x6u mco_ogu m: 0. sum: pmmm>mm «to: admsmca ucosumocu c.xo« aco_o;u .mxooz «w cow uo_p cmuo_p sad m~ cu ocamooxo acmxoddo» oo_E c. .ucau_~_co_m m 48.98 .828 a: .8 5.: 2...on 328.5838 1 umflu u mCOLLOVCOm zn poczscouop .ocucoo vacuums pea acosuoocu zoo cassava eococoew_o .umou u.m.uuocc:o Sb poc_ecouop .ocucoo o__ no use acosuoocu coozuon oucecom~.o .pocommma «to: mosda> acoda>_:oo use cocoa oucocemec oases coco moocmocomoa a» panacea «to: >p0o_uca u_e_ooom <2 .2 828.82 .33 3 85.83% 832, .ou_e 9— to: ocean zoo soc m~ acodozu .oo.e n— we unseen Lew co_ua_>op penucauu « case u_cuoeooa can cause aueo o «o oxmv .—~ use .5 exam: ua poumooo pea .m x003 an c_xou acooogo a: or gums poom>mm ecu: e.as_ca unusuaocu c_xou acouogu .axoos - to» uo_p cauo_p oc_3o..ov (a. sauce o_c_ooou-c_omau use cmxou aco.ozu .o 0.96» 35 Figure 4. Cholera toxin -specific equivalent IgA and IgG concentrations following dietary DON and cholera toxin challenge. Mice were fed 25 ppm DON for 24 weeks and challenged with 10 ug cholera toxin/mouse at wk 5, and boosted at wks 7 and 21. Values determined by ELISA. Absorbances for immunoglobulin specific antibody were equated to absorbances from dilutions of mouse reference serum run concurrently and equivalent concentration values were assigned. Data shown are geometric mean (ng/ml) _-I_- S.D. for groups of 13 mice. The cholera-25 ppm DON group had 14 mice. Difference between treatment and ad lib control determined by Dunnett's t test. Difference between DON treatment and matched control determined by Bonferroni t test. Bars with identical letters are significantly different (p<0.01). 36 m 4 - 1 "u“ , P N "M“ 1 .4. .4. .4. w .4. .4. .4. .4. .4. .4. .4. .4. x x H N 4 .4 x a a .1... .4. c .4. .n. .u. . . .4. r... 1 .M. .4. u o m n . . .4. V.‘ V b .M. m o. o m .4. . m a L.’ § r1 .V 1 m o m _ 1 .1 lllll .. 0 11.0.91. 11 1 N. 200 E on . Amwwummmoo. 9.6.0 2%... 820m0 g 0 as .w 8 .888 M (101/60) 0L6o sad '1 61 01p s 13 O 37 cholera toxin-25 ppm DON group. The means of these groups were statistically analyzed by Dunnett's t test and grouped together as week 21 in figure 5. Cholera toxin specific IgA levels in the immunized DON treated animals were elevated (p<0.01) 5 fold at week 21 when compared to the ad lib control. Interestingly, cholera toxin specific IgA at this time was not elevated in the DON group that was challenged with cholera toxin when compared to the cholera control. Both cholera toxin groups were elevated (p<0.01) relative to the ad lib control at weeks 8 and 21. The cholera toxin- specific IgA titer in the unimmunized control fed 25 ppm DON was significantly elevated relative to the ad lib control. Casein-specific IgA data were pooled at weeks 20 and 22 in the same manner as the cholera toxin specific IgA (Fig.5). Following 21 weeks of dietary DON, casein-specific IgA was significantly elevated (p<0.01) in the 25 ppm DON treatment groups relative to their ad lib controls for both cholera toxin immunized and unimmunized groups (Table 9 and Fig. 5). A 32-fold difference in DON-treated animals was observed in immunized animals relative to the ad lib control. This same profile was seen at week 8 in the immunized groups. The antigen-specific equivalent IgA level and total IgA concentration in the intestine are presented in Table 11. The casein-specific equivalent IgA level and the total IgA concentration were increased (p<0.05) in the cholera toxin-25 ppm DON group, however the latter was not significant. Cholera toxin-specific equivalent IgA level was decreased in mice fed 25 ppm DON and challenged with cholera toxin 38 Figure 5. Casein -specific equivalent IgA and IgG concentrations following dietary DON and cholera toxin challenge. Mice were fed 25 ppm DON for 24 weeks and challenged with 10 ug cholera toxin/mouse at wk 5, and boosted at wks 7 and 21. Values determined by ELISA. Absorbances for immunoglobulin specific antibody were equated to absorbances from dilutions of mouse reference serum run concurrently and equivalent concentration values were assigned. Data shown are geometric mean (ng/ml) : S.D. for groups of 13 mice. The cholera-25 ppm DON group had 14 mice. Difference between treatment and ad lib control determined by Dunnetts't test. Difference between DON treatment and matched control determined by Bonferroni t test. Bars with identical letters are significantly different (p<0.01). 39 9.602, a? (lw/6u)°L60'| 6| omoeds ugesog zoo 5% 81:98 8295 8 Coo £on 2225 a zoo 8%. mm a 68:8 flu 40 Table 10. Cholera and Casein-specific serua 196 following 8 weeks of dietary DON and oral cholera toxin challenge. \ . . b Antigen specific 19!) Logmms/ml) 7w— Treatment Cholera toxin Casein ad lib control 3.65 s 0.18 6.11 s 0.62 25 ppm 0011 3.48 s 0.08 4.92 s 0.94° cholera control 5.43 s 1.09° 5.93 s 0.86 d 85", cholera-25 ppa DON 3.59 s 0.20 5.26 s 0. .Mice were fed 25 ppm 0011 in AlN-76A diet for 8 weeks. Cholera toxin treatment animals were gavaged with 10 ug cholera toxin at week 5, and boosted at week 7. (Exp 6) bData shown are geometric mean a standard deviation for grows of 13 mice. The cholera-25 ppm DON groq: had 14 mice. Values determined by ELISA. Absorbances for igG specific antibody were equated to absorbances from mouse reference serua and equivalent values were assigned. Difference between treatment and ad lib control determined by Dmtt' s t test. Difference between DON treatment and matched control determined by Bonferroni t test. cSignificantly different than ad lib control (p<0.01). d Significantly different than matched cholera toxin control (p<0.01). 41 Table 11. Total and antigen-specific intestinal lgA following 22 weeks of dietary DON and oral cholera toxin challenge. b Antigen specific lgA-Log1o(ng/ml) Treatment Cholera toxin Casein ‘ Total TgA cholera control 3.68 s 1.18 1.70 s 0.00c 2.51 3 0.22 cholera-25 ppm pm 2.45 s 0.71 1.99 a 033° 2.66 3 0.21. ~ r—v .aNice were fed 25 ppm DON in AlN-76A diet for 8 weeks. Cholera toxin treatment animals were gavaged with 10 ug cholera toxin at week 5, and boosted at week 7 and 21. (Exp 6) bData shown for antigen specific lgA are geometric mean a standard deviation for groups of 13 mice. The cholera-25 ppm DON group had 14 mice. Values determined by ELISA. Absorbances for lgG specific antibody were equated to absorbances from mouse reference serum and equivalent values were assigned. Values for total lgA were determined by ELTSA with concentrations determined from mouse reference serua. Difference between treatments determined by Students t test cValues with identical letters are significantly different (p<0.05) 42 relative to the cholera toxin control but this was not significant due to the large amount of variation. Cholera toxin and casein-specific IgA responses correspond to the total IgA profile generated upon chronic dietary DON exposure. Serum was analyzed for cholera toxin and casein specific IgG at week 8 to see if this immunoglobulin also mimics the decrease in total levels found following DON exposure (Table 10, Fig.4,5). Cholera toxin challenge elevates cholera toxin specific IgG (p<0.01) as has been described previously (Elson and Balding, 1984). This effect was suppressed when animals were fed 25 ppm DON and challenged with cholera toxin (p<0.01). Casein-specific IgG concentrations were also significantly decreased (p<0.05) in animals that received dietary DON regardless of cholera toxin challenge. Casein specific IgG levels were the same in the cholera toxin control and in the ad lib control. These results suggest that the dietary DON is responsible for the decrease in casein specific IgG and not due to the co- administration of DON and cholera toxin. To validate the specificity of the antigenic-specific ELISA's, fractions of serum were pooled from mice at week 22 that were treated with 25 ppm DON and challenged with cholera toxin. Absorbance decreased 67% with 100 ug/ml free cholera toxin in the assay. Fractions of serum were likewise pooled after 20 weeks of 25 ppm DON and tested for casein specific IgA. Absorbance was decreased 59% with 500 ug/ml free casein. I}; vitro immunoglobulin production by isolated 43 splenocytes following dietary DON exposure. In M immunoglobulin production by isolated splenocytes was evaluated to assess the contribution of the systemic compartment to elevated serum IgA following DON exposure The objective of these _i_n li_t_rg studies were to demonstrate that the spleen was involved with the elevated serum IgA presented in earlier in 2139 studies. Mitogens are commonly used to induce lymphocyte activation. LPS and Con A are B and T cell lymphocyte mitogens respectively and were employed to stimulate the lymphocytes and induce immunoglobulin secretion. Table 12 indicates that IgA production by isolated splenocytes was markedly affected by DON exposure. Of 5 trials performed to demonstrate the _i_n E1319 immunoglobulin production, trial 2 was selected as most representative of the Q y_i_trg studies and is presented in figure 6. Here LPS stimulated lymphocytes from DON -treated animals exhibited a 400% increase in IgA production relative to the restricted and ad lib control lymphocytes. This same profile was seen in the Con A and Con A-LPS stimulated lymphocytes. Interestingly, there was an even greater total increase in IgA production from DON treated animals compared to the restricted and ad lib control in spontaneous (non-mitogen stimulated) lymphocytes. This is shown by the stimulation index in table 12 which describes the IgA produced by the combined effect of mitogen and/or treatment relative to the spontaneous ad lib control. Table 13 shows in vitro IgG production by isolated 411 .mc.ovcc .ococoo o.. oo coooa_c.ococ_ c... acoco.._o sooooo_._ca_mo soda) am. on «neocoucoomxoa.o> «coeuoocu u a._.mv woos. co_ua.:e_umo .mco_uac_ecouop e .6 case «neonates. undo) .ouoo_oo:p c. po>ammo aces .amcu zone soc. ozooz m soc. «accusatooam .m use .4 .n m.o_cu :— .aco_uoc_5copop a so come mucomocooc o:.a> ..a_cu some so.» m..os e co. ounu_.o:p c_ postsccoo oo co. coco: co .oexo: o~ no. ope mc3-< coo ...e\u: ope < coo ...e\m: o~a me. o. oooooxo uco 84o.-_za¢-mo. uo~ c. cocoooco oco: .ooo:\_c\o..oo o. x m..aco_acooooa .ooo «oo_om ..m.o.n _m_co. coco: - co .~.. .oaca. oooo: —~ co. ao_o coo_o co zoo coo mm no. cap: ._o_co\~c oo_a .mooo Am~.o-v Aep.~v Ase.o—v .~—.pv ahc.ne A—o.ov Apn.onv -.o « -.~ pm—.o « a~.n no.o « o—.n pop.o « os.n w—.o « ~o.~ pmo.o « ’n.n pp.o « ~h.n poo.o « mn.e m anm.mv A—c.pv A-.¢v amp.—v Aoo.nv Aoo.nv “om.hv up.o « up.» poo.o « po.n mo.o « nn.n p~o.o « —Q.n p~.o « n~.n no.o « s~.n -.o « o~.n -.o « oo.e e «~m.ov “No.-v Ae~.hv n~o.~—. “05.0. “~—.ov Aoo.pov op.o « —m.~ po-.o « n¢.n o—.o « om.n up.o « sn.n oe.o « om.m n—.o « on.n up.o « ~¢.n poo.o « on.¢ n An—.opv Amm.ov zoo.nv Aon.ov n¢~.nv zoo.~v Awo.opv o~.o « mm.n pop.o « n¢.¢ n~.o « so.m pm—.o « ~o.n e—.o w po.~ pmo.o « «o.n on.o « '5.n poo.o « oo.¢ ~ . Ao~.m~v ahn.o~ aco.o—v n—n.oO n—e.hv Ano.~v. awe.n~v ua._.mv em.o « oo.~ poo.o « on.¢ s..o « be.~ pop.o « no.n o—.o « on.~ opp.o « p~.n oo.o «.pn.n p~p.o « o~.¢ — am. on zoo o_. no zoo o.. no zoo n_. on zoo .a_cp 11111mseocoucoom111111 mo41< cou1111111. 11111111< sou 1 moo 338.28. 8:22.88 s: o amouxoocos>d u_co.oo pouadom_ zo co_uu:p6co (a. ocu_> c_ co zoo >couozp co uuowmm .NF o.oop C... 1 4 . .9. 45 Figure 6. Effect of dietary DON on in vitro IgA production by isolated splenocytes. B6C3F1 mice (2/trial) were fed 25 ppm DON for 21 weeks. Restricted groups were fed AIN—76A diet at level equivalent to mean intake of 25 ppm DON group. Spleen cell suspensions (51: 105 cells/well) were prepared in 20% RPMI-1640 and exposed to LPS (20 ug/ml), Con A (10 ug/ml), Con A- LPS (10 and 20 ug/ml) or water for seven days at 37°C-5% C02. Supernatants were analyzed for IgA by ELISA. Data shown are mean (ug/ml) : S.E.. Groups with identical letters are significantly different (p<0.01). Data for figure from trial 2 of table 12. 46 mnj maoocoucoom L... :00 < :00 . ma: e... 1.3a: we: to o o .988 so .9560 popotbmoc mm a zoo Eoo mm D m .9 .8 .mm on on -9. en. -OP (lw/6n) v6] 47 lymphocytes. Three experiments were analyzed for IgG with trial 2 being most representative and presented in figure 7. As expected, LPS- activated lymphocytes produced the largest amount of immunoglobulin. With all the mitogens and the spontaneous control, no significant difference was seen between lymphocytes from DON treated animals and the ad lib control. Contrary to the IgA profile, spontaneous IgG production was very small. In gInng IgM production by isolated lymphocytes is presented in table 14. Three experiments were measured for IgM with trial 2 shown in figure 8. IgM production was significantly decreased in single mitogen stimulated cultures from DON treated animals relative to the ad lib control (p<0.05). .Again, very little IgM was produced in the spontaneous cultures. 48 Amo.ovov .ocucou o_. to comou_e-acucm coca «cocommmp >.ucao_~_co_mp 03d.) Dmd U0 §u§m\gd0> ucguflflhu 1|. Ao—amv KO‘: Smuadgwumu .mco_uoc_scouoo n we case as» uc_ucomocaoc oa.o> ecu :u_z poaaco>o ecu: mouoo_.a:o .m..os n co» ouuu.oa:o c. ooscoccoo >amoa .n use ~ u_o_cu c. .acomuac_eceuop n .6 cans «accustom. o:.o> .m..o3 e to. ouau_.a:p c. ooscowcoa zooms .- .a_cu c~ ..o.m « “owned. cane u.cuosoou ace cacao conga ~ .3 um~ cow po~>.ncn aces «accusatooam . 8 smock so or... coaoo co. coco: .3 333: 8 as. o: 2.-.. :8 .359 o: < :8 .253 2.... m... 3 B893 2.. o3.-§s..8. en E 8.82.. 22. 3.2.2328 2 x .8 8388a... :8 «8.8 .8 it: foo: - co 3.. it: 9.8.. 2.. co. 8...... c8... co :8 8.. mm no. 82. 3:35 8:. .83.. “eh.ov “Fo.—u Awn.—v “No.pv Apn.ov An~.0v Amn.m—v ~F.o « mh.~ «n.o « ~o.~ co.o « no.n ¢~.o « Fo.n s—.o « po.n c—.o « oo.~ mo.o « oh.~ Np.o « mo.n n Aoo.wv goo.nv a—n.nv aho.pv Aop.—v “oh.vpv A0¢.mpv op.o « ce.~ mo.o « ve.~ -.o « no.~ mo.o « oa.~ op.o « s¢.~ oo.o « ce.~ ~o.o w po.n o~.o « no.n ~ Aom.ov A...oe .~..oe «mo.ne Apo.nv 6....mv ~m.o « so.n —o.o « eo.~ 11111 11111 n~.o « -.~ oo.o « oe.~ oo.o « mo.n no.o « bu.n p o_. no zoo a_. on zoo o_. no zoo o_. no zOo .o_cp maoocmucoom 11 ma.-< coo < coo 1mm. AALexocvo—ooa co.uocucoucou on. amou>665os>. o_co.om pouaooam zn co_uu:poco on. ocu_> cm co zoo zcoue_p we nooccm .n— o.oap 49 Figure 7. Effect of dietary DON on In vitro IgG production by isolated splenocytes. B6C3F1 mice (2/trial) were fed 25 ppm DON or 21 weeks. Spleen cell suspensions (5 x 10 cells/well) were prepared in 20% RPMI-1640 and exposed to LPS (20 ug/ml), Con A (10 ug/ml), Con A-LPS (10 and 20 ug/ml) or water for seven days at 37°C-5% CO . Supernatants were analyzed for IgG by ELISA. Data shown are mean (ug/ml) : S.E.. Groups with identical letters are significantly different (p<0.01). Data for figure from trial 2 of table 13. 50 '90 (119/ ml) .1974. 3% 11.2. rt m/ 00: > oo: >l mooofioomocm Cum 51. Amo.ovav dagucou n_. an caucuma-oguc_ cusu acogow*_u >ducnumwmcmmmu 03;) nm— E §u§m\gdfl> HEUOOBU l Aonomv Rug: Smufldgmumu .mco_uac_agouuu n *0 came 0:» oc_ucomogaog o:.u> as» :u_3 vomago>a «Lo: monoumdaso .m.do: n Lo. ouaumdaju cm vaEgo*goa >ammo .n was ~ m.a_gu :— .mco_uac_agouou o vo came uucomogaou o:.a> .m..az ¢ go» ouau__a:u c. uoELo*Loa >omma .— domgu c. ..o.m « Ac—nodv cane u_guosoou ago csozm ganja m .3 to. go» no~>.aco one: mucauQCguaam . cu am-uo~n an axon co>au Lo. Luau: Lo ..a\ua o~ ac. °.. mad-< cog ...e\ma o.. < cog ...e\u: o~v mm; 0» nomoaxo new oeo.-.:¢x-mu. aom c. uoLmaaga «.03 ...a:\.e\u..ou o. x m. aco_acoamau ..uu «no.am .Am.o.n .amguv axouz - no Aw.— domguv «goo: p~ no. uomv ecu.u go 200 sun mm nay ego: a.n_gu\~v cums “muons a—m.0v Aon.o~v aom.~pv akm.~v AnF.—v Anm.p~v AnN.N—v c—.o « o~.~ pp.o « cm.~ No.0 « FP.¢ 09.: « no.n 0°.o « o~.n o—.o « mo.~ ca.o « ~—.¢ ~o.o « «c.¢ m Ano.ov A—o.-v Am~.F—v Ao~.ov n—o.—v a¢n.~nv A—m.ov p..o « uo.~ no.9 « so.~ mo.c « no.q uno.o « an.n o~.o « om.n uno.o « mo.~ oo.o « n—.c unp.o « oo.n ~ A.~.cv .oo.o. Aw—.ov o~.¢v Aq~.n. ua._.m. om.o « ~o.n o~.o « se.n III». .0511. Fn.o « mm.~ No.0 « o~.~ oo.o « on.¢ oc.c « mp.e p a_. u. zoo n_. u. :09 n_. no zoo 3.. no zoa .._g» Illllmaoocnucoam 'r, wa4-< con «¢ < coul14 mag- o, A.e\ucv no. co_uagucoucou aa— a amouxuogasx. u_co.aa touadoom xn cowuunuOQQ zu— Ogum> cm :0 20° >gauo.v we uuom*w .e— 0.50» 52 Figure 8. Effect of dietary DON on _i_p_ vitrg IgM production by isolated splenocytes. B€C3F mice (2/trial) were fed 25 ppm DON or 21 weeks. Spleen cell suspensions (5 x 10 cells/well) were prepared in 20% RPMI-164O and exposed to LPS (20 ug/ml), Con A (10 ug/ml), Con A-LPS (10 and 20 ug/ml) or water for seven days at 37°C-5% CO . Supernatants were analyzed for IgM by ELISA. ata shown are mean (ug/ml) : S.E.. Groups with identical letters are significantly different (p<0.01). Data for figure from trial 2 of table 14. 53 mm Con A- Spontaneous LPS ppm DON . ”WA ”*l Control [:125 m g Con A ”C ~—"’f’///////////////////////// “H lllllllrl (DCDV'NOCDCOV'NO (lw/bn) W5l LPS DISCUSSION Immunoglobulin is a major weapon of the immune response to infection. Immunoglobulin responses involve binding and neutralization of infectious agents as well as interaction with other cell types that initiate various immune reactions. Since the greatest exposure the host has to foreign antigens occurs in the gut, specialized lymphoid tissues and cell networks are located here to respond to antigens thus preventing harm to the host. Figure 9 demonstrates the major organs involved in an immune response, and the route of circulation of lymphocytes between the tissues (Male, 1986). Peyer's patches are specialized pools of lymphocytes that line the small intestine. Here specialized M cells within the Peyer's patches function to sample antigen absorbed through the intestine. This antigen, still fully immunogenic, is exposed to the underlying B and T cells of the Peyer's patch. A significant percentage of B cells in the Peyer's patch are committed to IgA production. The antigen-stimulated B cells migrate from the Peyer's patch through the mesenteric lymph nodes to the thoracic duct and ultimately into circulation. During this time, the B cells mature to IgA producing plasma cells or memory cells which eventually will "home" to distant mucosal tissues. Here they produce IgA specific for the antigen that caused stimulation in the Peyer's patch. 54 55 Figure 9.Major organs involved in an immune response and the route of circulation of lymphocytes between the tissues (Male, 1986). 56 Q o ' ' cl > “u“ .--§y d. a, a ”I ,' '. . ‘ _ . . . ,. -"-"T.'." . 49:33....3 ;*;;§€$e.condary lymphoud organs. lymph Waldeyer's nodes. ring tonsils and adenoids thymus lymph nodes bone marrow spleen mesenteric lymph nodes Peyefs patch lymph nodes tp/ 57 Immunoglobulin A (IgA) is the major immunoglobulin at mucosal surfaces where it functions as a first line of defense. Here it binds and neutralizes antigen before it can be absorbed and cause harm. The function of IgA in serum is however unclear relative to its critical role in secretions. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) are the major serum immunoglobulins whereas IgA accounts for only 15-20% of total immunoglobulin (Roit et al., 1985). In humans the majority of serum IgA does not enter external secretions in significant amounts. It has been hypothesized that IgA in serum exists only to bind absorbed antigen that wasnfit cleared at the mucosal surfaces. The work.presented here provides strong evidence that DON exerts a specific effect on IgA. The decrease in serum IgG and IgM observed here and previously (Forsell et al., 1986) upon dietary DON exposure is consistent with a potent protein synthesis inhibitor. The inclusion of restricted controls demonstrated that the decrease in serum IgG can be partially explained by decreased feed intake caused by DON. Work performed by Forsell et alu.(1986) demonstrated that 8-week dietary DON causes a dose-dependent increase in serum IgA. The threshold DON level for this increase was 2 ppm, whereas maximum IgA was found at 10 ppm. IgA at 25 ppm was significantly greater than the control but less than at 10 ppm. The purpose of this thesis was to develop a model that could be used to study mechanisms by which dietary DON alters serum immunoglobulin levels. The first experiment did not show elevated IgA following 8 weeks of 2 ppm dietary DON 58 although 10 ppm DON did significantly elevate serum IgA in experiment 2 from weeks 4 through 8. This verified the work of Forsell et al. (1986) and demonstrated that the increase in IgA can be seen as early as 4 weeks of dietary DON. Subsequent experiments demonstrated an even greater increase (17 fold at 24 weeks) in serum IgA at 25 ppm DON which expands upon the previous study. There is a possible explanation for the difference between DON levels where maximum serum IgA were found in the earlier work (10 ppm) by Forsell and that (25 ppm) reported here. The treatment animals in the Forsel study were less robust and appeared "more sickly" than animals in these studies (MQF. Witt, personal communication). A prior or ongoing mucosal infection in the animals of the Forsell study could have conceivably caused a much larger IgA response thus making the animals more sensitive to DON effects. IgA levels in the control mice from the Forsell study were 2-fold higher than an average of the control mice reported in this thesis. Although serum IgA from the previous study was quantitated by the ELISA method, these levels were again verified in frozen serum samples by the RID procedure performed for this thesis. In a preliminary experiment not reported in this thesis, animals were challenged with sheep red blood cells and keyhole limpet hemocyanin concurrently with dietary DON in an attempt to increase the control levels of serum IgA. ‘Ehis protocol was unsuccessful in elevating the control levels of serum IgA to those reported in the Forsell study. To better assess the affect of DON on the antigen- 59 specific IgA response, cholera toxin and dietary casein were used as model antigens. Cholera toxin has been found to be an extremely potent immunogen for mucosal IgA responses when administered orally. When fed 10 ug cholera toxin, mice exhibit cholera toxin-specific IgA in intestinal secretions and substantial increases in cholera toxin-specific plasma IgG and IgA levels (Elson and Ealding, 1984). When the mice in this thesis were fed DON for 21 weeks and simultaneously challenged with cholera toxin, there was similar elevation in cholera toxin-specific serum IgA, but no difference was detectable between the cholera toxin or cholera toxin-25 ppm DON groups. It is thus apparent that the ability of cholera toxin to elicit a serum IgA response was not effected by DON. However cholera toxin-specific IgG concentrations were dramatically decreased in animals receiving dietary DON. This is likely a reflection of DON induced reduction of total IgG. Total IgA concentrations and antigen-specific equivalent IgA levels in the intestine correspond to those reported in the serum. There was a trend toward higher casein-specific as well as total IgA in the cholera toxin-DON treated mice than in mice treated with cholera toxin only. However this was not significant due to the large amount of variation. Nevertheless the results do suggest that DON treatment does not decrease gut IgA. Caseinrspecific serum IgA concentrations were sharply increased in animals receiving DON. 'The opposite profile was observed with casein specific IgG. Casein is normally 60 digested in the gastrointestinal tract and absorbed as small peptides. These small peptides are then further metabolized to carbon and nitrogen sources for metabolic activities in the cell. Forsell et al., (1987) showed that acute doses of DON resulted.in.extensive necrosis of thelgastrointestinal tract. It is possible that increased.absorption of casein due to DON induced increased intestinal permeation is responsible for an increased IgA response. This is consistent with the total IgA profile generated upon dietary DON exposure. The decrease in casein-specific serum IgG also parallels the total IgG profile, and like cholera toxin may be explained as a reflection of the DON induced decrease in total IgG concentration. Tryphonas et al. (1986) showed that certain blood proteins were non-specifically decreased in animals consuming DON, and one could speculate that IgG was similarly reduced. .Again these observations may also beta secondary effect of DON-induced feed refusal. The observation that DON feeding increased in yitgg IgA production by splenocytes was important because it favors the possibility that DON affected synthesis of IgA rather than catabolism. A large amount of IgA produced is catabilized by the liver. Vaerman et al., (1978) proposed that in rodents, the liver functions as an "IgA pump" that regulates serum levels of IgA by transporting circulating polymeric IgA into the bile. Thus blockage of catabolism might be explained to cause elevated serum IgA. However the observation that spleen cell cultures from DON treated mice produced elevated IgA favors the possibility that DON was affecting the 61 regulation of IgA synthesis. Mitogen stimulated splenic lymphocytes from mice fed dietary DON produced much larger amounts of IgA in yitgg than their respective restricted and ad lib controls (Fig. 6). The total IgA produced in the DON groups relative to its controls was larger in the spontaneous than in the LPS stimulated group. LPS is a polyclonal B cell mitogen. One would expect LPS-stimulated B cells to produce larger amounts of immunoglobulin than in non-mitogen stimulated (spontaneous) controls. It is possible splenic IgA lymphocytes from DON treated animals were already stimulated and did not require mitogen to stimulate B cells to produce immunoglobulin. This could be argued by observations in the Con A and Con A-LPS mitogen stimulated IgA cultures. Elson et al., (1979) demonstrated that Con A-pulsed spleen T cells added to fresh LPS-stimulated B cell cultures induced the suppression of IgA, IgG, and IgM synthesis. The authors point out that this suppression is mediated by T cells. Fig. 6 shows that IgA produced in Con A—LPS stimulated cultures from DON treated animals were similarly less than that produced in LPS-stimulated cultures from these same animals. The suppression exhibited by Con A alone in these cultures further argues for prior stimulation of lymphocytes in DON treated animals. Although the preparation of spleen cell cultures in this thesis did not involve the separation of B and T cells as was done by Elson et al., the results of the in 31359 studies using crude splenocyte cultures support the observation of Elson et al. and suggests prior stimulation of 62 splenic lymphocytes from DON treated animals. A further argument for lymphocyte stimulation by DON can be made with the antigen-specific response data. Non-immunized mice fed dietary DON exhibited an increased cholera toxin-specific equivalent IgA level (Fig 4). This suggests that dietary DON by causing an increased IgA response in a non-immunized host might be acting as a polyclonal stimulator of IgA production. There was no significant difference in IgG production in cultures between DON-treated or control mice. In contrast to IgA, there is very little IgG produced in the non-mitogen stimulated cultures from DON treated animals. This was also true for IgM production from spontaneous cultures of DON treated animals. There was a trend toward decreased IgM production in mitogen stimulated cultures from DON treated animals but these results were significant in only one of three experimental trials (table 13). In general these results support the concept of isotype-specific dysregulation of immunoglobulin production caused by DON. The major success of the research in this thesis was the development of a model for studying trichothecene-induced dysregulation of IgA synthesis. Since much of the information is preliminary it is not possible to make specific conculusions on the mechanistic basis for this effect. However it is possible to speculate as to possible causes for the observations and suggest further experiments. First, the possibility of increased permeation of the dietary protein casein eliciting an IgA immune response was addressed earlier in this thesis. Future experiments should further 63 investigate antigen-specific IgA production in isolated splenic lymphocytes from the spleen and Peyer‘s patches. This would help to determine if the DON effect represents an antigen specific response rather than a polyclonal effect. A second potential explanation for the increase in serum IgA would be an increase in the number of IgA producing cells. There are many potential ways that this could occur. One would be through a direct effect of DON; IRecently Miller and Atkinson (1986) demonstrated that low DON concentrations induced the release of the lymphokine interleukin 1 (IL-1) from peritoneal macrophage. IL-l release from antigen presenting cells such as macrophage could initiate a cascade of T cell activity involving the further release of lymphokines to mediate immune activity. Murray et al., (1987) demonstrated that the lymphokine IL-S produced by T cells causes secretion of IgA by B cells and that this secretion is magnified two to threefold in combination with IL-4. IL-4 and IL-5 are produced by the T helper 2 (Th2) subset of T cells. Gamma interferon is produced by the Th1 subset of T cells and has been shown to down-regulate IL-S stimulation of IgA secretion. The authors suggest that a higher proportion of Th2 relative to Th1 cells reside in the Peyem"s patches. The effects of trichothecenes on lymphocyte stimulation suggest that DON may be affecting T cells and accessory cells such as macrophage. This could ultimately involve interleukins at the Peyer's patch level which could theoretically alter IgA regulation. Future experiments should examine spleen and Peyer"s patch cultures from DON 64 treated animals for an increase in interleukin activity, specifically IL-4 and IL-5. In summary, the data presented here demonstrate that exposure to dietary DON increases serum IgA and concurrently decreases IgG and IgM. The antigen-specific immunoglobulin response to cholera toxin and casein reflects the total immunoglobulin profile generated upon dietary DON exposure. Splenocytes from mice fed dietary DON produced increased IgA in mitogen stimulated and spontaneous cultures. These results suggest that dietary DON alters the regulation of IgA production. The dysregulation of IgA production has been associated with a common form of glomerulonephritis known as IgA nephropathy. This nephropathy is characterized by accumulation of IgA in the mesangial region of the kidney glomerulus. IgA has also been shown to inhibit in yitrg natural killer cell activity which attack tumor, virus- infected, and undifferentiated normal cells. This research demonstrated a dysregulation of IgA production in the systemic compartment be dietary DON and provides a model for further study of the effects of mycotoxins on the immune system. LITERATURE CITED 65 LITERATURE CITED Bunner, D.L., R.W. Wannemacher, H.A. Neufeld, C.R. Hassler, G.W. Parker, T.M. Cosgniff, and R.E. Dinterman. 1985. Pathophysiology of acute T-2 intoxication in the cynomolgus monkey and rat models. in: Trichothecenes and other mycotoxins. edited by J. Lacey. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, N.Y. chapter 37: 411-421. Challacombe, SJ. and T.B. Tomasi,Jr. 1980. Systemic tolerance and secretory immunity after oral immunization. J. Exp. Med. 152: 1459-1472. Cote, D.M., J.D. Reynolds, R.F. Vesonder, W.B. Buck, S.P. Swanson, R.T. Coffey, and D.C. Brown. 1984. Survey of vomitoxin— contaminated feed grains in midwestern United States, and associated health problems in swine. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 184(2): 189-192. Cooray,R. 1984. Effects of some mycotoxins on mitogen-induced blastogenesis and SCE in human lymphocytes. Fd. Chem. Toxic. 22(7): 529-534. Cooray, R. and K. Lindahl-Kiessling. 1987. Effect of T-2 toxin on the spontaneous antibody -secreting cells and other non-lymphoid cells in the murine spleen. Fd. Chem. Toxic. 25(1): 25-29. Council for agricultural science and technology. Report No. 80. December 1979. Davis, N.D. and U.L. Diener. 1987. Mycotoxins. Chapter 15. in: Food and beverage mycology. 2nd edition. L. Beuchat. Elson, C.O. and W. Ealding. 1984. Generalized systemic and mucosal immunity in mice after mucosal stimulation with cholera toxin. J. Immunol. 132(6): 2736-2741. Elson, C.O., J.A. Heck, and W. Strober. 1979. T cell regulation of murine IgA synthesis. J. Exp. Med. 149: 632-643. Floss, H.G. and J.A. Anderson. Biosynthesis of ergot toxins. chapter 2. Pages 18-67. 1980. in: The biosynthesis of mycotoxins. edited by P.S. Steyn. Academic Press. Forsell, J.H. and J.J. Pestka. 1985. Relation of 8- ketotrichothecene and zearalenone analog structure to inhibition of mitogen-induced lymphocyte blastogenesis. App. Environ. Microbiol. 50(5): 1304-1307. 66 Forsell, J.H., J.R. Kately, T. Yoshizawa, and J.J. Pestka. 1985. Inhibition of mitogen-induced blastogenesis in human lymphocytes by T-2 toxin and its metabolites. App. Environ. Microbiol. 49(6): 1523-1526. Forsell, J.H., M.F. Witt, J.-H. Tai, R.. Jensen, and J.J. Pestka. 1986. Effects of 8-week exposure of the B6C3F1 mouse ot dietary deoxynivalenol (vomitoxin) and zearlaenone. Fd. Chem. Toxic. 24(3): 213-219. Forsell, J.H., R. Jensen, J.-H. Tai, M. Witt, W.S. Lin, and J.J. Pestka. 1987. Comparison of acute toxicities of deoxynivalenol (vomitoxin) and 15 -acetyldeoxynivalenol in the B6C3F1 mouse. Fd Chem. Toxic. 25(2): 155-162. Forsyth, D.M., T. Yoshizawa, N. Morooka, and J. Tuite. 1977. Emetic and refusal activity of deoxynivalenol to swine. App. Environ. Microbiol. 34(5): 547-552. Luster, M.I., J.H. Dean, and J.A. Moore. 1982. Evaluation of immune functions in toxicology. chapter 18. in: Hayes principal and methods of toxicology. edited by A. Wallace Hayes. Raven Press, New York New York. Greenhalgh, R., J. Gilbert, R.R. King, B.A. Blackwell, J.R. Startin, and M.J. Shepherd. 1984. Synthesis, characterization, and occurence in bread and cereal products of an isomer of 4- deoxynivalenol (vomitoxin). J. Agric. Food Chem. 32: 1416-1420. Hagler, W.M.Jr., K. Tyczkowska, and P.B. Hamilton. 1984. Simultaneous occurence of deoxynivalenol, zearalenone, and aflatoxin in 1982 scabby wheat from midwestern United States. App. Environ. Microbiol. 47(1): 151-154. Lafarge-Frayssinet, C., G. Lespinats, P. Lafont, F. Loisillier, S. Mousset, Y. Rosenstein, and C. Frayssinet. 1979. Immunosuppressive effects of Fusarium extracts and trichothecenes: blastogenic response of murine splenic and thymic cells to mitogens. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 160: 302-311. Male,D. 1986. in: Immunology. An illustrated outline. Gover Medical Publishing Ltd.s. p.13. Miller, K. and H.A.C. Atkinson. 1986. The in-vitro effects of trichothecenes on the immune system. Fd. Chem. Toxic. 24(6/7): 545-549. Miller, K. and H.A.C. Atkinson. 1987. The in-vitro effects of trichothecenes on the immune system. Mechanisms and models in toxicology. Arch. Toxicol. Suppl. 11: 321-324. 67 Mirocha, C.J., S.V. Pathre, B. Schauerhamer, and C.M. Christensen. 1976. Natural occurence of Fusarium toxins in feedstuff. App:. Env. Microbiol. 32 (4): 553-556. Murray, P.D., D.T. Mckenzie, S.L. Swain, and M.T. Kagnoff. 1987. Interleukin 5 and interleukin 4 produced by peyer's patch T cells selectively enhance immunoglobulin A expression. J. Immuno. 139(8): 2669-2674. National Research Council. 1983. The trichothecene mycotoxins: their structure, natural production, and levels of occurence. chapter 2. in: Protection against trichothecene mycotoxins. National Academy Press. Washington D.C. Otakawa, M., Y. Shibaha, and Y. Egashira. 1979. The inhibitory effect of T-2 toxin on tolerance induction of delayed type hypersensitivity in mice. Jap J. Med. Sci Biol. 32,37. Pestka, J.J., J.-H. Tai, M.F. Witt, D.E. Dixon, and J.H. Forsell. 1987. Suppression of immune response in the B6C3F1 mouse after dietary exposure to the Fusarium mycotoxins deoxynivalenol (vomitoxin) and zearalenone. Fd. Chem. Toxic. 25(4): 297-304. Pier, A.C., J.L. Richard, and SJ. Cysewski. 1980. Implications of mycotoxins in animal disease. J. Am. Vet. Med. Ass. 176(8): 719-724. Robbana-Barnat, S., C. Lafarge-frayssinet, H. Cohen, G.A. Neish, and C. Frayssinet. 1988. Immuno -suppressive properties of deoxynivalenol. Toxicology. 48: 155-166. Snider, D.P. and B.J. Underdown. 1986. Quantitative and temporal analyses of murine antibody response in serum and gut secretions to infection with Giardia muris. Infect. Immun. 52: 271-278. Tomar, R.S., B.R. Blakley, and W.B. DeCoteau. 1988. In vitro effects of T-2 toxin on the mitogen responsiveness and antibody- producing ability of human lymphocytes. Toxicol. Lett. 40: 109- 117. Trucksess, M.W., M.J. Flood, and S. W. Page. 1986. Thin layer chromatographic determination of deoxynivalenol in processed grain products. J. Assoc. Aff. Anal. Chem. 69(1): 35-36. Tryphonas, H., F. Iverson, Ying So, E.A. Nera, P.F. McGuire, L. O'Grady, D.B. Clayson, and P.M. Scott. 1986. Effects of deoxynivalenol (vomitoxin) on the humoral and cellular immunity of mice. Toxicol. Lett. 30: 137-150. 68 Tryphonas, H., L. O'Grady, D.L. Arnold, P.F. McGuire, K. Karpinski, and R.E. Vesonder. 1984. Effect of deoxynivalenol (vomitoxin) on the humoral immunity of mice. Toxicol. Lett. 23: 17-24. Ueno, Y. 1983. Historical background of trichothecene problems. chapter 1.in: Trichothecenes chemical, biological, and toxicological aspects. Elsevier. Amsterdam, Oxford, New-York. Witt, M.F. L.P.Hart, and J.J. Pestka 1985. Purification of deoxynivalenol (vomitoxin) by water-saturated silica gel chromatography. J. Agric. Food Chem. 33: 745-748. "I111111111111ES