.1 ' . 1:15: 4:. : - «I ....‘-'v; .. .. :E .2923? .7. WI '- '.I [I '1‘ II I IN I’? : ‘ " ‘I‘Izi KIWI” “It: .. I . . .I I . If”! ”mu } 7 ‘2". ‘3. -.._,.5 "I“' . . .» mm 2.3:»: III‘IIIA III I". U " : “t"l-IIIII _III§‘I"». ' ‘ISIIIQI'I‘IF'I 0' .I - 1. . .1. A, u'. "oL‘fi 3”. {III' III. I' IIIIIII é?“ .“ IfI',‘ 1' :33:- “I I1; “EL“: an ; I 39:) q‘ . 2r.” I III 1'1. 5-0 '5, b:.'.’II"'I'I"I .. I III‘I" I'III‘III'. ‘ “l; I,.;IIII l‘.‘ 'I II In ‘. 'l ‘ ‘ .‘1:‘En‘l‘ftri‘wII.-F;:t .3sz H . ,4 III;<5;I??r'-' 'aYI'Ii: ”22'" .r"'-*;¢'-.'-_"'" IL! 3. :_.‘:I:I’:.; {I ’ . mu” I! 'v ‘1l‘I'IIIh' ' II I115???" "I! ' IFS! 51.: .IV: I _V.K‘I ”‘5'3‘ " WE'III , 9!}? [QIIII-II‘ I,‘ I ,‘I' 'gI' II"! III1 I‘IIfi.’ l.. ‘ ’ - I: I . Ibiwvrl'vfffif IVL-IHIwfiI I I I .Ip“ ‘I “5 “II: 24 :III III"'II' IftIIJ I.ITII1IIII.'II" II '1‘": ‘I’EII »'. III I. - I I' ' fIIIII‘IIr '-'.-,:'I 'II L AWN" I‘IJ’IIII II EEI' 43?" I ”‘Ii'. :IIIII pII IICLZ‘. IIII.’ I, tIIIIIII III ' . "1'11- I} II; .3” "I ."""'I I I . 3 .IrIi- 'I.-.III " If!) in "i l I ‘t'ergI I. . ‘5 _ 1H; ' 5a 2* ) ”Hi. 1, ‘g . 1351*. $32.???“ .III»! H I f. fl I . , ‘wr vhf—33 . :" ”.I .. ”'- . .-,.-:II‘ II 5V1: _’ 9‘ h: I. ~ .7 : I‘R' : - .4? 57¢. I " II IIIIIII :IrII.“ 4ng '3. ‘ VIII“; 1,. 3.3%.?) :‘IJ‘IIfiI-I -. ‘éfi‘.‘:§_..' . I III III:I, L .II I\III~:U$IIIE‘II II. Siffl II I .hv.'IL:l‘rJ“ ’I:;IhI I I . o . ‘ . I I 'éf;V£-;?:..£?:I3.t;§7§, I H.) 'HI‘T. .. I " .3: ‘ . I I p ‘I j» '.'.,..A ' I 4. ‘5‘. . ‘ I . _ f]. I . f .I 4. I - _ 5 . . I '. . . I l I, . .- .P " ' | I I ’ NIP] W" :y‘: I ”3J3 I I I " S“ u ‘ -‘ ' ' I I I I . V. .1 I I I I ' b I I,” III“. I I II . .5 . I _ u _ ‘ II II TI I I I I: :H" 'e‘!‘ '5'"? fir-H 9"“ .‘II' I' 'I ' ' ' - ‘ I I "I' (( I . o; I“. . I l ‘ II . f; .5 . - v1 7‘. . _ 3..I\:\I " u —v- an .I. .921" _ "2,..- .7, . :II-u|l .(II 1‘} IIIII_I3II;" I . .~ . i g . 1 91“: ,- 3 ,. EI m' . I‘ "I“? "I :I“ ' I I': ‘!;II I .‘ I: I“ :I on I I . . .' Inn "IIIII: 1% 3 g; 3. III-II; :1”, III I; '1 1120‘ III II" II‘ .IjI.’ '.I. _, -'Iif'I7.I i ' II x - ‘5 I Ii . I! 5 ' II I’I- ~- I I}- IEIII-I h- t ~m M A an» ~ .. . ' n -v~.— - www—wv--w q-“ ' 3.5-. 'm—-. 1‘ . luv-r mam-m. un— ? Cumu— In. a F. . . $.2- Arv-v- . 13%HHQ70 ’ 111111111 NH ‘. .111qu l; 1 1293 00606 049 LIBRARY "Michigan State University This is to certify that the dissertation entitled Observations on B-Mannosidosis in Goats presented by Julia Isabelle Frei has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for Ph.D. degree in Pathology d/ 'Vz/MC a jor professor Date May 19, 1989 MS U is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Institution O~1277 1 PLACE IN RETURN BOX to remove this checkout from your record. TO AVOID FINES return on or before an. duo. DATE DUE DATE DUE DATE DUE MSU Is An Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Initiation OBSERVATIONS ON fl-MANNOSIDOSIS IN GOATS By Julia Isabelle Frei A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Pathology 1989 @03077’ ABSTRACT OBSERVATIONS ON B-MANNOSIDOSIS IN GOATS BY JULIA ISABELLE FREI fi-Mannosidosis is an autosomal recessive lysosomal storage disease of glycoprotein catabolism in goats which is attributed to a deficiency in the activity of lysosomal fi-mannosidase. Affected goats are characterized by the accumulation of the disaccharide, Manfi1-4GlcNAc (DS) and the trisaccharide, Manfil-4GlcNAcfi1-4GlcNAc (TS) in brain and kidney. Two tetrasaccharides, Manfl1-4GlcNAcfi1-4Manfi1- 4GlcNAc (C1) and Mana1-6Man31-4GlcNAcfi1-4GlcNAc (C2) and the pentasaccharide, ManBl-4GlcNAcfi1-4Manfi1-4GlcNAcfi1- 4GlcNAc (C) have also been identified in the kidney. The objectives of this study were to purify and characterize lysosomal B—mannosidase and the stored oligo- saccharides. A morphometric examination of selected peripheral nerves was also conducted to determine if myelinated axon diameter differed significantly between a fi-mannosidosis goat and an age- and sex-matched control. Goat kidney fi-mannosidase was partially purified, using a protocol incorporating FPLC, 11,500-fold, to a Julia Isabelle Frei specific activity of 80,500 units/mg protein, and with a 3% yield. Several isozymes of B-mannosidase were detected between pH 5.5-6.5 after isoelectric focusing. This is the first documentation of a highly purified lysosomal fi- mannosidase from goat tissue. Peripheral nerve and thyroid oligosaccharides were purified by Bio Gel P-4 and P-2 chromatographies, respectively. 08 and TS were identified, in peripheral nerve, on the basis of TLC mobility and GC-MS of their permethylated intact alditol derivatives. Five oligosaccharides were purified from the thyroid and subjected to sugar composition analyses and direct inlet-MS of the reduced and permethylated alditol derivatives. 08, TS, C and a 01/02 mixture were identified. The partial characterization data on the fifth compound provides evidence for a possible novel oligosaccharide in the thyroid. Oligosaccharides C1 and C represent previously undescribed compounds. In the morphometric study, the diameter of myelinated axons in cross-sections of sciatic, peroneal and tibial nerves were measured using a semi-automatic image analyzer. The individual data points were transformed to yield a Gaussian distribution of axon diameters. The statistical model used for the analysis of the data is a factorial arrangement of the treatments (genotypes and peripheral Julia Isabelle Frei nerve) in a randomized complete block. The data provides preliminary evidence that B-mannosidosis in goats is associated with a statistically significant (p < 0.005) reduction in the mean myelinated axon diameter of all nerves analyzed. COPYRIGHT BY JULIA ISABELLE FREI 1989 To my father Frank Frederick Frei (1924- ) His Dedication, Love and Support made this possible. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I thank my committee members Drs. Kathryn Lovell, Adalbert Koestner, Justin McCormick, Robert Hausinger and William Wells without whose guidance and patience this dissertation would not have been accomplished. I am especially grateful to Drs. Kathryn Lovell, Adalbert Koestner and Justin McCormick for their understanding, support and "words of wisdom". I also acknowledge the financial assistance of the College of Osteopathic Medicine's Medical Scientist Training Program (MSTP). Specifically crucial was the contribution of the Department of Pathology which provided an academic home and climate for growth and development. I am indebted to Patty Healey, Jane Benke and Beth Heinlen for their excellent clerical assistance and support. Patty Healey was especially dedicated and spent extended hours typing when needed. We became close friends and both of us felt a sense of loss when the work was completed. Beth Heinlen, the MSTP's administrative assistant, made it possible to communicate long distance with my committee members. I am especially grateful and indepted to Ralph Common for his excellent photographical skills. His perfectionism contributed significantly to the oral and written presentation of the data. I thank Dr. Frank Verley who has served as my continuous mentor, role model, supporter and evaluator. Both Drs. Frank Verley and Allan Olson have encouraged me, throughout my undergraduate, medical school and Ph.D. training, to maintain my individuality, independence, values and principles which at times have created significant obstacles. In retrospect, however, I am proud that I have never compromised my values and principles to obtain the D.0. or Ph.D. degrees. I also thank Devchand Paul, Liz Smith, Kay Butcher and Drs. Arlene Smith, Celia Guro, Shirley Siew and Mary McConnel for their moral support. Kay Butcher was especially generous with her time and her "listening ear". Finally, I acknowledge the continuous support, at all levels, of my parents, grandmother and brother. Everything I have accomplished depended heavily upon their willing sacrifices and support. CHAPTER 2: PARTIAL PURIFICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF LESOSOHALlfirflANNOSIDASE FROM NORMAL GOAT KIDNEY This work was conducted in Dr. Margaret Jones' laboratory (Department of Pathology) and Dr. Robert Hausinger's laboratory (Department of Microbiology). The purification protocol I developed was implemented by Chris Chic and Mike DuPuis to make available samples of the enzyme. Dr. Keiji Marushige's advise and cooperation were very helpful in solving the numerous technical problems encountered in the conduct of this work. Dr. Robert Hausinger's guidance was crucial in my use of the FPLC in the purification protocol. His contributions resulted in a significant improvement in the purification of the enzyme. A part of the purification protocol and the isoelectric focusing results are published in Frei, J.I. gt a; (1988) Biochem. J. 252, 871-875. The support of Drs. Margaret Jones, Kevin Cavanagh and Rachel Fisher was responsible for my initiation of this study. They also provided numerous comments related to the enzyme purification. CHAPTER 3: PURIFICATION AND PARTIAL CHARACTERIZATION OF PERIPHERAL NERVE AND THYROID OLIGOSACCHARIDES This project was done with guidance of Drs. Fumito Matsuura and Margaret Jones. Work was conducted in Dr. Charles Sweeley's laboratory (Department of Biochemistry) and Dr. Margaret Jones' laboratory (Department of Pathology). The methylsulfonyl carbanion, used for the peripheral nerve methylation studies, was prepared by Dr. Fumito Matsuura. Drs. Margaret Jones and Eileen Rathke were responsible for the extraction and preliminary purification of the thyroid oligosaccharides. Dr. Rathke determined the yield of thyroid DS and TS. Dry, redistilled DMSO and acetic anhydride were obtained from Dr. Kimihiro Kanemitsu (Department of Biochemistry). Betty Baltzer (Department of Biochemistry, Mass Spectrometry Facility) performed all the GC-MS and MS analyses. All other procedures were performed by this investigator. CHAPTER 4: HORPHOHETRIC EVALUATION OF PERIPHERAL NERVE This project was conducted under the direction of Dr. Kathyrn Lovell, my major professor, in the Department of Pathology. Ralph Common took the photomicrographs of the sciatic, peroneal and tibial nerves. The embedding and sectioning of these nerves was done by Ralph Common and/or other personnel in the Department of Pathology's electron microscopy laboratory. The expertise of Dr. Frank Verley (Department of Biology, Northern Michigan University) was crucial to my development of the statistical model needed to analyse the morphometric data. Numerous graduate iv students, specifically Dubear Kroening, in the Statistics Laboratory at Northern Michigan University provided technical assistance. All other procedures were conducted by this investigator. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE LIST OF FIGURES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xi LIST OF TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xiv LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . XVI CHAPTER 1: LITERATURE REVIEW I. Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II. Investigation of Lysosomal Storage Diseases . 3 III. Biosynthesis of Lysosomal Enzymes . . . . . . 7 IV. fi-Mannosidosis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 V. Human B-Mannosidase Deficiency . . . . . . . 25 VI. Lysosomal B-Mannosidase . . . . . . . . . . . 27 VII. List of References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 CHAPTER 2: PARTIAL PURIFICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF GOAT KIDNEY LXSOSOHAL fi‘HANNOSIDASE ABSTRACT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 I. Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 II. Statement of the Problem. . . . . . . . . . . 56 III. Materials and Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 A. Materials. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 B. Methods. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 1. Enzyme Assay. . . . . . . . . . . . 59 2. Protein Determination . . . . . . . 59 vi CHAPTERB: I. II. 3. Electrophoresis . . . . . . . . 4. Fast Protein Liquid Chromatography. . . . . . . . . 5. High Speed Supernatant Preparation . . . . . . . . . . 6. Concentration . . . . . . . . . Results 0 O O O O O O C I I O O O O I O O A. Recovery and Stability of Lysosomal p-Mannosidase. . . . . . . . . . . . B. Lysosomal p-Mannosidase Purification C. Isoelectric Point. . . . . . . . . . Dj-SC‘ISSion O O O O O O C O O O O O O O O 0 Appendix: Conventional Hydrophobic Chromatography. . . . . . . . . . . . . List of References. . . . . . . . . . . . OF PERIPHERAL NERVE AND THYROID OLIGOSACCHARIDES mm“. 0 C O O O 0 O O O O O O O O 0 Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Structural Characterization of N-Linked Oligosaccharides. . . . . . . . . . . . . A. Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . B. Fractionation. . . . . . . . . . . C. Carbohydrate Composition . . . . . . D. Glycosidase Digestion. . . . . . . E. Methylation Analysis . . . . . . . . vii PURIFICATION AND PARTIAL CHARACTERIZATION PAGE 59 60 60 61 62 62 62 72 74 77 82 85 87 91 91 91 94 95 96 F. Mass Spectrometry and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Analyses . . . . . . . . . . III. The Structures of Accumulated N-Linked Oligosaccharides in the Glycoproteinoses. . IV. Statement of the Problem. . . . . . . . . . V. Materials and Methods . . . . . . . . . . . A. Materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. Tissues. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. Chromatography Supplies, Chemicals and Solvents . . . . . . . . . . . B. Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. Gel Permeation Chromatography. . . 2. Thin-Layer Chromatography. . . . . 3. Analytical Methods . . . . . . . . 4. Isolation and Purification of Oligosaccharides . . . . . . . . . a. Peripheral Nerve Oligosaccharides. . . . . . . b. Thyroid Oligosaccharides. . . 5. Sugar Composition Analyses . . . . 6. Preparation of the Methylsulfonyl Carbanion. . . . . . . . . . . . . 7. Methylation Studies. . . . . . . . 8. Gas Chromatography . . . . . . . . 9. Gas Chromatography- Mass Spectrometry. . . . . . . . . 10. Mass Spectrometry. . . . . . . . viii PAGE 97 99 101 102 102 102 102 103 103 103 104 105 105 106 108 109 110 112 112 113 PAGE VI. Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 A. Peripheral Nerve Oligosaccharides. . . . 114 1. Isolation of Oligosaccharides . . . 114 2. Partial Characterization Studies. . 117 a. Structure of DS. . . . . . . . 117 b. Structure of TS. . . . . . . . 117 B. Thyroid Oligosaccharides . . . . . . . . 122 1. Isolation of Oligosaccharides . . . 122 2. Partial Characterization Studies. . 127 a. Structure of DS. . . . . . . . 127 b. Structure of TS. . . . . . . . 132 c. Structure of Oligosaccharide A. . . . . . . 132 d. Structure of Oligosaccharide B. . . . . . . 133 e. Structure of Oligosaccharide C. . . . . . . 134 VII. Discussion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138 VIII. List of References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149 CHAPTER 4: HORPHOHETRIC EVALUATION OF PERIPHERAL NERVE ABSTRACT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159 I. Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161 II. Basic Pathological Mechanisms . . . . . . . . 164 III. Methods Used in the Study of Peripheral Nerve. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166 A. Biopsy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167 ix VII. VIII. B. Biochemical Studies. . . . . . . . . . . c I Horphometry O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Pathology of the Peripheral Nervous System in the Lysosomal Storage Diseases . . . . . . . Statement of the Problem . . . . . . . . . Materials and Methods. . . . . . . . . . . A. Animals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B. Tissue Collection. . . . . . . . . . . C. Fixation, Staining and Sectioning. . D. Collection of Data . . . . . . . . . . E. Statistical Method . . . . . . . . . . 1. Experimental Design . . . . . . . 2. Analysis of the Data (Computation of the Sum of Squares). . . . . . 3. Hypotheses to be Tested . . . . . 4. Test of Significance. . . . . . . Results and Discussion. . . . . . . . . . . A. Sciatic Nerve. . . . . . . . . . . . . B. Peroneal Nerve . . . . . . . . . . . . C. Tibial Nerve . . . . . . . . . . . . . D. Cranial Nerves V and VIII. . . . . . . . E. The Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) . . . . List of References . . . . . . . . . . . . PAGE 168 169 172 177 178 178 178 179 179 180 184 186 186 190 191 191 197 201 208 216 220 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1. Pathway of Asparagine-Linked Oligosaccharide Synthesis in the Rough Endoplasmic Reticulum. . . . . . . . . . . Structures of the Major Types of Asparagine-Linked Oligosaccharides. . . Reactions Involved in the Processing of N-Linked Oligosaccharides, of Newly Synthesized Glycoproteins, to High Mannose- and Complex-Types . . . . . . . . Synthesis of Hybrid- and Bisected Complex-Type N-Linked Oligosaccharides of Newly Synthesized Glycoproteins . . . . Pathway for the Lysosomal Catabolism of a Typical Biantennary Asparagine-Linked Sugar Chain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Con A-Sepharose Chromatography of fi-Mannosidase . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gel Filtration of fl-Mannosidase. . . . . . FPLC Cation Exchange Chromatography of fi-Mannosidase. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FPLC Anion Exchange Chromatography of B-Mannosidase. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Phenyl—Sepharose Chromatography of fi-Mannosidase . . . . . . . . . . . . xi Page 11 13 18 23 29 65 67 69 71 81 Figure 3-1. The Two Major Carbohydrate Peptide Linkages in Various Glycoproteins. . . . . . . . . . . The Structure of the Core Common to Asparagine-Linked Oligosaccharides. . . . . . Thin-Layer-Chromatogram of Peripheral Nerve Oligosaccharides. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gas Chromatogram of the Intact Permethylated Oligosaccharide Alcohol from Disaccharide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mass Spectrum of the Intact Permethylated Oligosaccharide Alcohol from Disaccharide and the Proposed Structure. . . . . . . . . . Gas Chromatogram of the Intact Permethylated Oligosaccharide Alcohol from Trisaccharide. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mass Spectrum of the Intact Permethylated Oligosaccharide Alcohol from Trisaccharide and the Proposed Structure. . . . . . . . . . Thin-Layer Chromatogram of Partially Purified Thyroid Oligosaccharides . . . . . . Thin-Layer Chromatogram of Purified Thyroid Oligosaccharides. . . . . . . . . . . Mass Spectrum of the Deuterium-Labeled Permethylated Oligosaccharide Alditol from C and the Proposed Structure . . . . . . The Oligosaccharides Stored in B-Mannosidosis Goat Tissues. . . . . . . . . . . .7. . . . . Distribution of the Mean Axon Diameters for Sciatic Nerve Type 1 Fascicles from a 4-Day-01d Control and Affected Goat . . . . . Distribution of the Mean Axon Diameters for Peroneal Nerve Type 2 Fascicles from a 4-Day-01d Control and Affected Goat . . . . . Distribution of the Mean Axon Diameters for Peroneal Nerve Type 3 Fascicles from a 4-Day-01d Control and Affected Goat . . . . . xii Page 90 93 116 119 121 124 126 129 131 137 142 196 203 205 Figure Page 4-4. Distribution of the Mean Axon Diameters for Tibial Nerve Type 1 Fascicles from a 4-Day-01d Control and Affected Goat . . . . . . 211 4-5. Distribution of the Mean Axon Diameters for Tibial Nerve Type 2 Fascicles from a 4-Day-Old Control and Affected Goat . . . . . . 213 4-6. Distribution of the Mean Axon Diameters for Tibial Nerve Type 3 Fascicles from a 4-Day-01d Control and Affected Goat.. . . . . . 215 xiii LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1-1. Disorders of Glycoprotein Degradation . . 30 1-2. Selected Physical Properties of Mammalian Lysosomal fl-Mannosidases. . . . . . . . . 33 1-3. Kinetic Properties of Mammalian Lysosomal B-Mannosidases. . . . . . . . 36 2~1. Purification of Goat kidney Lysosomal fi-Mannosidase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 2-2. Purification of Goat kidney Lysosomal fi-Mannosidase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 3-1. Di- and Tri-Saccharide Concentrations in Samples from fi-Mannosidosis Goats. . . 147 4-1. Experimental Layout . . . . . . . . . . . 185 4-2. Weighted Mean Axon Diameter (um) Totals . 187 4-3. Treatment Weighted Mean Axon Diameter (um) Totals. . . . . . . . . . . 188 4-4. Calculations for the ANOVA. . . . . . . . 189 4-5. The Mean Axon Diameters of Sciatic Nerve from a 4-Day-Old Control Goat . . . . . . 192 4-6. The Mean Axon Diameters of Sciatic Nerve from a 4-Day-01d Control Goat . . . . . . 193 4-7. The Means of the Pooled Axon Diameters of Left and Right Sciatic Nerve from 4'DaY'Old Goats o o o o o o o o o o o o o 194 xiv 4-11. 4-12. 4-13. 4-14. The Mean Axon Diameters of Peroneal Nerve from a 4-Day-01d Control Goat . . . . . . The Mean Axon Diameters of Peroneal Nerve from a 4-Day-01d Affected Goat. . . . . . The Means of the Pooled Axon Diameters of Left and Right Peroneal Nerve from 4—Day-01d Goats O O O O O O O O O O O O O The Mean Axon Diameters of Tibial Nerve from a 4-Day-Old Control Goat . . . . . . The Mean Axon Diameters of Tibial Nerve from a 4-Day-01d Affected Goat. . . . . . The Means of the Pooled Axon Diameters of Left and Right Tibial Nerve from 4-Day-01d Goats . . . . . . . . . . . . . Summary of the ANOVA. . . . . . . . . . . Page 198 199 200 206 207 209 217 A AC Asn fi-ME BSA cDNA CHC13 CM-Sephadex 1 C-NMR CNS Con A DMSO DS ER FAB-MS FPLC Fuc Gal GalNAc GC GC-MS GDP-Man Glc GlcNAc GlcNAc-P Glc-P-Dol GUI G142 H2 304 'H-NMR HPLC-MS ABBREVIATIONS Acetyl Asparagine fi-Mercaptoethanol Bovine serum albumin Complementary deoxyribonucleic acid Chloroform Carboxymethyl-Sephadex Carbon 13-nuclear magnetic resonance Central nervous system Concanavalin A Dimethylsulfoxide Man31-4GlcNAc Endoplasmic reticulum Fast atom bombardment-mass spectrometry Fast protein liquid chromatography Fucose Galactose N-Acetylgalactosamine Gas chromatography Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry Guanidine diphosphate—mannose Glucose 2-Acetamido-2-deoxyglucose (N- acetylglucosamine) 2-Acetamido-2-deoxyglucose-phosphate Glucose-phosphate-dolichol Galfil-BGalNAcfil-4Gal(3-20NANA)fil-4Glcfil- 1'Cer GalNAcfil-4Gal(3-2aNANA)fi-1Glcfi1-1'Cer Sulfuric acid Proton-nuclear magnetic resonance High performance liquid chromatography- mass spectronmetry xvi Man Man-6-P Man-P-Dol MeOH MNP-fi-D-Man mRNA MS Na2804 NaBH4 NANA NaB[2H]4 NaOH NaB[3H]4 NeuNAc NaN3 (NH4)2$O4 ONP-B-D-Man PMAA PMSF PNP-a-Xyl PNP-B-D-Gal PNP-B-D-Man PNP-fi-Xyl PNS RER SDS SDS-PAGE Ser SRP Thr TS UDP-GlcNAc Mannose Mannose-6-phosphate Mannose-phosphate-dolichol Methanol Metanitrophenol-fi-D-mannopyranoside Messenger ribonucleic acid Mass spectrometry Sodium sulfate Sodium borohydride N-Acetylneuraminic acid Sodium borodeuteride Sodium hydroxide Tritiated sodium borohydride N-acetylneuraminic acid Sodium azide Ammonium sulfate Orthonitrophenol~5-D-mannopyranoside Partially methylated alditol acetate Phenylmethysulfonylfluoride Paranitrophenol-a-xyloside Paranitrophenol-B-D-galactoside Paranitrophenol-B-D-mannopyranoside Paranitrophenol-fi-xyloside Peripheral nervous system Rough endoplasmic reticulum Sodium dodecyl sulfate Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis Serine Signal recognition particle Threonine Manfi1-4GlcNAcfil-4GlcNAc Uridine diphosphate-2-acetamido-2- deoxyglucose xvii CHAPTER 1: LITERATURE REVIEW I. INTRODUCTION All metabolic diseases are attributable to abnormalities in the genome (1). It is now possible to identify specifically the chromosomal region(s) of DNA causing the genetic disorder(s). In humans, examples are fi-thalassemia, the short arm of chromosome eleven (11p), Tay-Sachs, the long arm of chromosome fifteen (15q), galactosemia, the short arm of chromosome nine (9p) and many others (1). This level of achievement drew heavily on the insightful and ingenious studies of Sir Archibald Garrod (2) who first postulated the inborn error concept. The experiments of Beatle and Tatum (3) established later that genes control the presence of enzymes. Pauling and Ingram (4,5), however, provided the first direct evidence, in humans, that mutations actually produce an alteration in the primary structure of proteins. These observations, collectively, are overwhelming evidence that inborn errors of metabolism are caused by mutant genes some producing abnormal proteins with altered functional activities. 2 Lysosomal storage diseases, first described by Hers (6) in 1965, are inborn errors of metabolism due to deficiencies of lysosomal enzyme activities. In general, these disorders result in the intralysosomal accumulation of a compound which normally is the substrate for the deficient enzyme. Lysosomal enzymes function in the catabolism of complex macromolecules such as sphingolipids, mucopolysaccharides, mucolipids, glycogen and glycoproteins (7,8). These substrates are delivered to the lysosome for catabolism by receptor-mediated endocytosis or are endogenous to the cell. The latter process, autophagy, is a normal part of the turnover and replacement of cell constituents. Well described lysosomal storage diseases in humans include Fabrys (a-galactosidase A deficiency) (9), Tay-Sachs (fl-hexosaminidase A deficiency) (10), Pompes (a- glucosidase deficiency) (11) and Gauchers (fi-glucocere- brosidase deficiency) (12). Lysosomal enzymes or acid hydrolases (pH optima 3.5- 5.5) function normally within the lysosome. This subcellular organelle was first described by deDuve (13) in 1955. The lysosome is bounded by a single lipoprotein membrane and maintains an acidic environment (pH 5.0-5.5) by use of a proton pump (7). Macrophages and cells of the mononuclear phagocytic system are especially rich in lysosomes. A few of the hydrolases function as membrane- bound enzymes (e.g., fi-glucocerebrosidase and acid 3 phosphatase), however, most others (e.g., B-glucuronidase, a-L-fucosidase, a-mannosidase and a-galactosidases A and B) are water soluble enzymes in the matrix of the lysosome and/or are in loose association with the membrane (7). All acid hydrolases are glycoproteins, containing N-asparagine— linked oligosaccharide chains, and most are exolytic enzymes which cleave sugars (glycosidases), sulfate (sulfatases) or fatty acids (esterases and amidases) one at a time from the ends of larger molecules (7). II. INVESTIGATION OF LYSOSOHAL STORAGE DISEASES Inborn errors of metabolism, including the lysosomal storage diseases, were described first by physicians in terms of their clinical phenotypes, patterns of inheritance and histopathology. In 1881, Dr. Tay (14), a British ophthalmologist, described the clinical features of Tay- Sachs disease, a model lysosomal storage disease. He reported a cherry-red macular degeneration in the fundus of an infant with marked weakness of the trunk and limbs. Subsequently, Dr. Tay described two additional patients in the same family and four in another family. Dr. Bernard Sachs (14), an American neurologist, independently reported clinical and pathological observations on an infant with blindness and dementia. From the observations of Drs. Tay and Sachs, it was concluded that this disease, given the name Tay-Sachs, was inherited as an autosomal recessive. 4 It was recognized quite early, however, that a single lysosomal storage disease represented not one but several phenotypes differing in clinical signs and symptoms. The disorders were generally designated according to the time of onset (e.g., infantile through adult), clinical features and sites of pathology (e.g., neuronopathic or nonneurono- pathic). Later, the disorders were regrouped according to the chemical identification of the uncatabolized substrate(s) (e.g., galactocerebroside in Krabbes disease) and the amount of residual, tissue and/or plasma enzyme activity (total versus partial). Thus, the documented clinical heterogeneity was also confirmed by the significant biochemical heterogeneity. The biochemical investigation of lysosomal storage diseases progresses through several phases (7). First, there is identification of the enzymatic defect responsible for the disease. More than thirty lysosomal enzyme deficiencies have been described in humans (7,8). Effective and reliable diagnosis of homozygotes and heterozygotes entails specifying substrates (natural or synthetic) and optimum assay conditions necessary for the detection of the deficient enzyme. Identification of the natural substrates(s) involves purification and structural characterization of the uncatabolized, accumulated compound(s). 5 In the second phase, the purified enzymes' physical- chemical and kinetic properties are characterized. It is also advantageous to determine the primary, secondary and tertiary structures of the enzyme, however, this information is often difficult to obtain because lysosomal enzymes are generally present in low absolute concentrations in mammalian tissues (7,15). These properties are important, not only to characterize the nature of the enzyme defect(s) but also, to elucidate the biochemical polymorphism of a particular disease. In one variant of Pompes disease (a-glucosidase deficiency), for example, no precursor enzyme is formed. In the other five variants, however, the precursors are detected but the mature enzyme is either not formed or is catalytically inactive (16). Various lysosomal hydrolases have been purified to homogeneity from human tissues (17-34). In addition, physical-chemical properties including amino acid composition (20-24,26,30,32,34,35,37), carbohydrate composition (38,39), structure of the N-linked oligosaccharide moieties (40-43) and partial amino acid or cDNA sequences (26,34,44-60) have been described. The identification of the role of low molecular weight activator proteins, associated with the lysosomal hydrolases, establishes stage three in the investigative process (61-68). The pathophysiological significance of the activator proteins was first documented in 1978. 6 Conzelman and Sandhoff (63) reported that the activator protein, necessary for the degradation of GMZ and GA2 by 8- hexosaminidase A, was absent in the AB variant of GMZ- gangliosidosis. The use of recombinant DNA technology ushers in phase four which entails cloning of the appropriate gene(s) coding for the lysosomal enzyme (26,34,44-60). To fully understand the molecular nature of the variety of gene mutations, it is essential to elucidate the function and structure of the normal gene. Genetic studies, including complementation analyses and biosynthesis, compartmental- ization and maturation of the lysosomal enzyme(s), will provide information on the molecular basis of the disorder(s). In addition, knowledge of how the gene(s) is(are) organized provides information on the structural and functional domains of the polypeptide(s). There are now many examples of exons corresponding to the structural and functional domains of proteins (60,68). It is reasonable to anticipate that stage five will be the description of the regulatory mechanism(s) for the gene(s) encoding the enzyme(s). Phase six will likely involve enzyme and/or gene replacement therapy. It is important to recognize that before replacement therapy can be permanently successful an understanding of how the gene(s) is(are) organized, regulated and expressed is needed. Since the mid 1960's, research has been directed 7 toward the development of therapeutic strategies for the enzyme deficiencies. These strategies have been focused, until recently, at the level of the primary metabolic defect, the specific enzymatic lesion. Two methods have been used for enzyme replacement therapy. The first involves direct administration of the missing enzyme (9,70- 79) and the second consists of transplanting cells (e.g., bone marrow) (9,70-72,80-96) capable of continually synthesizing the missing enzyme. Although enzyme therapy is feasible it may be impractical, at this point, due to the number of criteria that must be satisfied. Ideally, the definitive "cure" for inherited diseases in affected organisms would be the direct placement, in somatic cells, of the piece of DNA coding for the synthesis of the normal gene product. Recently, retroviral-mediated gene transfer completely corrected the enzymatic defect in Gaucher's disease type I fibroblasts (97) and in adenosine deaminase deficient fibroblasts (98). It may be possible, therefore, to treat various genetic diseases, including some of the lysosomal storage diseases, with genetically modified fibroblasts. III. BIOSYNTHESIS OF LISOSOMAL ENZYMES The biosynthesis of lysosomal enzymes (reviewed in 99-104) is a complex process involving (1) synthesis, glycosylation and carbohydrate trimming reactions in the ER: (2) transport to the Golgi; (3) vectorial transport in 8 the Golgi, which is coupled to a variety of carbohydrate processing reactions, and; (4) sorting of the enzymes to either lysosomes or secretory vesicles. Lysosomal hydrolases and other proteins, destined for multiple compartments, are synthesized in the cytoplasm on membrane-bound ribosomes. The mRNA's, coding for the pre- pro-form of the lysosomal enzymes, are translated until a signal sequence or peptide is produced. The signal peptide is a stretch of 15-30 largely hydrophobic amino acids residing at the N-terminus. Those proteins containing signal peptides are imported from the cytosol into the nucleus, mitochondria or ER depending on the type of signal sequence they contain. Proteins lacking the signal peptide become components of the cytosolic compartment. When the lysosomal enzyme's signal peptide protrudes from the ribosome it forms a complex with the SRP, a cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein. Subsequently, further translation is inhibited and the complex binds to the SRP receptor at the surface of the RER. The SRP is then released, the nascent protein is transferred into the lumen of the RER and translation resumes. The signal sequence of most proteins is released by a protease before polypeptide synthesis is completed. The signal peptide-directed translocation into the ER gives rise to the ribosome-studded regions known as the RER. Proteins imported into the ER include those enroute to lysosomes, nuclear or plasma membranes, 9 secretory vesicles as well as those proteins of the ER and Golgi. The initial stages of glycosylation in the RER occur during translation and involve a precursor oligosaccharide containing 3 Glc, 9 Man and 2 GlcNAc residues. The precursor is assembled by the stepwise addition of single sugar residues to the lipid carrier, dolichol (Dol). The first seven residues are added directly from the nucleotide sugars, UDP-GlcNAc and GDP-Man, while the final seven are added from Man-P-Dol and Glc-P-Dol (Figure 1-1). The Dol- pyrophosphate-linked oligosaccharide is then transferred, by an oligosaccharyltransferase, to an Asn residue in the polypeptide chain (Figure 1-1). The Asn residue must be in the sequence, -Asn-X-Ser(Thr)-, which makes it sterically available to the oligosaccharyltransferase. Most N- glycosylated Asn's are located in peptide segments forming fl-turns or loops. All Asn residues, in such tripeptide sequences, are not glycosylated which is probably due to steric hindrance caused by the rapid three-dimensional folding of the polypeptide chain. Efficient glycosylation is also dependent on a sufficient pool of preassembled lipid-linked oligosaccharide donors. Once glycosylation of specific Asn residues occurs, the oligosaccahrides are processed to high Man-, complex- and hybrid-forms (Figure 1-2). All three forms have been detected in lysosomal hydrolases (42,43). Processing 10 FIGURE 1-1. PATHWAY OF ASPARAGINE-LINKED OLIGOSACCHARIDE SYNTHESIS IN THE ROUGH ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM. See text for explanation. Adapted in part from (102). 11 Dol-P GIcNAc-PP-Dol UDP-GlcNAc l- J GlcNAcz-PP-Dol $9 GDP—Man GDP—Man MansGlcNAcz-PP-Dol DoI-P—Mar. a; DoI-P ManQGIcNAcz-PP-Dol 1 Dol-P-Glc % 1 UDP—Glc GlcsMangGlcNAcz-PP—Dol —Asn—X—Ser(Thr) fDDol-PP I Glc3MangGlcNAc2—Asn 12 FIGURE 1-2. STRUCTURES OF THE MAJOR TYPES OF ASPARAGINE- LINKED OLIGOSACCHARIDES. A: High Mannose, B: Hybrid and C: Complex. Most hybrid molecules contain a "bisecting" GlcNAc which is 81-4 linked to the B-linked Man of the inner core. The complex-type has from 2-5 outer branches ending with the sialyllactosamine sequence (NANA-GAL). Other common substituents, of the complex-type structures, are Fuc in a1-6 linkage to the innermost GlcNAc residue and a bisecting GlcNAc. All of the structures have the common pentasaccharide core, Mana1-3(Mana1-6)Manfil-4GlcNAcBl- 4GlcNAc-Asn, because they all arise from the same precursor lipid-linked oligosaccharide which is processed to these forms after transfer to Asn residues of the polypeptide. Adapted in part from (100). 13 o .. “2.: a \niucusun56.420.675.380 a.“ u Man {—7-— Man—GlcNAcz-Asn UDP -GlcNAc GlcNAc Transferase ll IT Man—GlcNAcz-Asn GDP-Fuc Fucosyltransferase TIT- Man—GIcNAc—GIcNAc—Asn I Fuc UDP-Gal CMP-NANA WT- Man-GIcNAc—GlcNAc—Asn I Fuc 19 FIGURE 1-3 CON'T. See text for explanation. Adapted in part from reference (100). 20 Glc3MangGIcNAc2-Asn a-Glucosidases I and II l Glc MangGlcNAz—Asn a—Mannosidase I Man ManBGIcNAcz-Asn iP I Man—Man\ Man\ $ \ Man/ Man—GIcNacz-Asn High Mannose ‘ Structures Man-Man—Man/ I j . I iP a-Mannosidase II L. Man Man \ 1 Man\ 1 Man / Man-GlcNAcz—Asn Man/ GlcNAc Transferase I UDP-GmNAc \/ / Man Man—GlcNAcz—Asn GlcNAc—Man 21 Control of oligosaccharide processing is achieved by the specific localization of the processing glycosidases and glycosyltransferases in the RER or the cis-, medial- or trans-Golgi. The type of oligosaccharide assembled, therefore, is largely dependent upon the order in which the newly synthesized N-linked glycoprotein encounters the processsing enzymes and their relative activities and specificities. Control over oligosaccharide processing is also exerted by conformation of the polypeptide(s). After processing of the N-linked oligosaccharide moieties, the lysosomal enzymes are converted, by a series of proteolytic reactions, into mature forms which are usually the forms isolated from tissues. Subunits of the enzymes are assembled as precursor polypeptides after most or all of the carbohydrate processing reactions have occurred and before the final proteolytic cleavage(s). Maturation and subunit assembly is coupled to transport of the enzymes to lysosomes. Lysosomal enzymes are transported to lysosomes by two processes: Man-6-P-dependent and Man-6-P-independent. Lysosomal hydrolases with Man-6-P residues bind to one of two Man-6-P receptors in the medial- to trans-Golgi. The bulk of these receptor-ligand complexes leave from the trans-Golgi in transport vesicles which eventually fuse with endosomes. As the endosomes convert to lysosomes, the receptor-bound enzymes are released in these acidic 22 FIGURE 1-4. SYNTHESIS OF HYBRID- AND BISECTED COMPLEX- TYPE N-LINKED OLIGOSACCHARIDES OF NEWLI SYNTHESIZED GLYCOPROTEINS. The enzyme, GlcNAc transferase III acts on both GlcNAcMan GlcNAcz and GlcNAczMan3GlcNAc2 to introduce a "bisecting" GlcNAc in 81-4 linkage to the fi-linked Man of the inner core. Processing of the hybrid and bisected complex oligosaccharides is then completed in the trans-Golgi by the action of galactosyl- and sialyl-transferases. 23 n .. chéugzso , a .. {5213226 cm: 24 compartments and the Man-6-P receptors cycle back to either the Golgi or plasma membrane. The Man-6-P receptors at the cell surface mediate intercellular exchange of those lysosomal enzymes that are secreted and/or mis-sorted. The Man-6-P-dependent transport mechanism is firmly established for fibroblasts but is not universally present or operable in all tissues. Several lines of evidence support the premise that Man-6-P-independent transport mechanisms are also involved in sorting lysosomal enzymes to lysosomes. In liver, spleen, kidney and brain from persons with I-cell disease, for example, the activities of many lysosomal enzymes are within the control range, although these tissues are deficient in GlcNAc-phospho- transferase activity. Furthermore, in I-cell fibroblasts, there are variable residual activities of some lysosomal hydrolases within lysosomes. Evidence has also been presented that proteins of the lysosomal membrane, including fi-glucocerebrosidase, are transported to lysosomes independent of Man-6-P residues. IV. fl-MANNOSIDOSIS The discovery and identification, of a lethal, autosomal recessive, lysosomal storage disease, 8- mannosidosis, in goats (105-107), has provided a unique opportunity to study and characterize the disorder at all investigative levels. p-Mannosidosis is attributed to a detectable deficiency in the activity of the lysosomal 25 enzyme fi-mannosidase in tissues (105,106,108-110), plasma (106,109,111) and skin fibroblasts (109,111,112). Goats affected with B-mannosidosis manifest severe neonatal neurological deficits (113-115) which are associated with widespread CNS dysmyelinogenesis and axonal dystrophy (106,113-117). Phenotypic features include the inability to stand, an intention tremor, pendular nystagmus, bilateral Horners syndrome, clinical deafness, narrowed palpebral fissures, thickened skin and a dome-shaped skull (113-115,118,119). The affected goats are also charac- terized by the accumulation of the disaccharide, Manfil- 4GlcNAc and the trisaccharide, Manfil-4GlcNAcfil-4GlcNAc in tissues (107,109,112,120-123), allantoic fluid (124) and urine (125). Higher molecular weight oligosaccharides also accumulate to a lower concentration in the kidney of affected goats (123). Lysosomal storage of these oligosaccharides is presumably represented by ubiquitous and diffuse cytoplasmic vacuolation in all tissues examined by use of light and electron microscopy (106,109,113- 117,126). V. HUMAN LISOSOMAL fl-MANNOSIDASE DEFICIENCY Deficient lysosomal p-mannosidase activity has been reported in humans (127-130). In a 46-month-old boy, the absence of fi-mannosidase activity, in plasma, leukocytes and skin fibroblasts, was documented (127). The parents had intermediate levels of fi-mannosidase activity 26 compatible with the heterozygote genotype. The disorder is, therefore, inherited as an autosomal recessive trait. The boy's skin fibroblasts were also devoid of heparin sulfamidase activity. This enzyme is deficient in Sanfilippos Type A syndrome (mucopolysaccharidosis III A). The relationship between these two enzymatic activities is unclear and anyone with Sanfilippos type A syndrome should be checked for fi-mannosidase activity. Mucopolysaccharid- uria and oligosacchariduria were detected and the major excretion product was identified as Man1-4GlcNAc, presumably the same disaccharide that accumulates in B- mannosidosis goats (107,109,112,120-125). Phenotypic characteristics included coarse facial features, mild bone disease, delayed speech development, hyperactivity and mental retardation. Deficiency of lysosomal fi-mannosidase activity, in plasma, leukocytes, urine and skin fibro- blasts, of an Indian man has also been described (128- 130). An autosomal recessive pattern of inheritance is proposed. Clinical assesSment, at 44 years of age, detected only mental retardation and angiokeratoma of the skin. A disaccharide was purified from the urine and it co-chromatographed with authentic Manfil-4GlcNAc on TLC. The man's 19-year-old brother was also mentally retarded, had similar skin lesions and a deficiency of fi-mannosidase activity in plasma and leukocytes. 2 7 The main similarities between the disorders in humans and goats are the mode of inheritance and excretion of the disaccharide, Man31-4GlcNAc, in urine. The absence of the trisaccharide, Manfll-4GlcNAcfil-4GlcNAc, in humans is attributed to differences in the degradative pathways for N-linked oligosaccharides in humans and goats (112). The milder clinical presentation and less severe phenotypic features of lysosomal B-mannosidase deficiency in humans may be the effects of this difference. VI . LYSOSOMAL B-MANNOSIDASE Lysosomal B-mannosidase acts at the last step in the catabolism of N-linked oligosaccharides of glycoproteins (Figure 1-5). Within lysosomes, the sequential action of a-L-fucosidase, neuraminidase, B-galactosidase, fi-N- acetylhexosaminidases A and B, a-mannosidase and finally 8- mannosidase, complemented by the action of endo-fi-N- acetylglucosaminidase, effects the degradation of glyco- proteins (7,131,132). In addition, the enzyme, asparaginyl-N-acetylglucosamine amidohydrolase, hydrolyzes the glycosasparagine linkage (7,131,132). Consequently, the storage materials in the inborn errors of glycoprotein catabolism are predominantly oligosaccharides, not glyco- peptides (Table 1-1). Inherited deficiencies have been described, in both humans and animals, for all the 28 FIGURE 1-5. PATHWAY FOR THE LYSOSOMAL CATABOLISM OF A TYPICAL BIANTENNARY ASPARAGINE-LINKED SUGAR CHAIN. The sequential action of a-L-fucosidase, neuraminidase, B- galactosidase, fl-N-acetylhexosaminidases A and B, a- mannosidase and finally fi-mannosidase, complemented by the action of endo-fi-N-acetylglucosaminidase, effects the degradation of N-linked glycoproteins. The enzyme, asparaginyl-N-acetylglucosamine amidohydrolase hydrolyses the glycosasparagine linkage. Adapted from reference (131). 29 0(220 + :0: ex $8a€§2£ N @8982ng— 3226?: £52 8.1282528 W @moo.mozzJG 6662556362 \ fimagfidfi 1256233 6 \pccosui 5632306153061: «663.62 c31£3226 3226?: £52 a a IEcaswt £3226ct£3661 «63.82 campwc‘EmmogfiiEoTzflopcm _ a \Scasat £320 .63: £.a6oI «63:2 6 I852": £32o .69: £366.: «6332 632862.16 V 746096003“: \j x n .\ rBCQSNI wfiO‘ZO-GQI wQ-QCOI «50‘s.: 3.2.3.53: £32231 £32331 £52 a K o c I 85.2“: £32263: £366... «6332 2 . 82E £3226 «I £5: :3.:£3226..I 8.42263: £5: E .86 3.86 5 3m 63636“ 3 6368066 3 a 63666669 5 63666666 3986322 63606366582£ 636663;". agavdng 9863838366 383828835 6360036005."— 38336 BE 31 exoglycolytic enzymes involved in N-linked glycoprotein catabolism (7,105,106,108-112,127-146). Lysosomal B-mannosidase is widely distributed in eukaryotic systems. Partially purified enzyme has been described for snail (147), marine gastropod (148), fungi (149), barley (150) and pineapple (151). Electrophore- tically pure preparations have been obtained from the fungi, Aspergillus niger (152,153) and Polyporus sulfureus (154) and the snail, Helix promatia (155). In vertebrates, lysosomal fl-mannosidase has been partially purified from hen oviduct (156), rat liver (157), goat liver (158) and human placenta (159), liver (163), serum and urine (161). The enzyme was purified to electrophoretic homogeneity from guinea pig liver (162). Purification and characterization of mammalian lysosomal fi-mannosidase has been hindered by many factors. Foremost is the absence of effective purification conditions that maximize enzyme stability and minimize loss and contaminating glycosidases (e.g., a-mannosidase, a- fucosidase and fi-N-acetylhexosaminidase). Therefore, optimum purification conditions have not been described and the reported yield, stability and activity of the enzyme are low in sources other than guinea pig liver. For these reasons, data on the physical and kinetic properties are limited (105,108,110,157-164). Tables 1-2 and 1-3 32 summarize the partial characterization of mammalian lysosomal fi-mannosidases. In control adult and neonatal goat tissues, lysosomal fi-mannosidase activity is characterized by a hierarchy as follows: thyroid > liver > kidney > brain (110). By contrast, enzymatic activity in mouse tissues displays the following pattern: kidney > spleen > lung > liver > brain > muscle (163). In humans, the hierarchy of fi-mannosidase activity is: plasma > leukocytes > skin fibroblasts (127). It is evident from Table 1-2, that goat liver, kidney, thyroid and brain have multiple forms of lysosomal B- mannosidase. All of these isozymes are deficient in caprine fi-mannosidosis (110). Evidence for two distinct forms of fi-mannosidase in goat liver was first presented by Dawson (108). Fractionation of supernatant solutions, on columns of Con A-Sepharose, resolved p-mannosidase activity into a bound form (pH optimum 5.0-5.5)-and an unbound form (pH optimum 7.0). From this observation, it was concluded that the lysosomal (bound) form was a mannose-rich N-linked glycoprotein whereas the unbound form was either a non- glycoprotein or contained sialic acid-rich or O-linked oligosaccharide units. Both forms of the enzyme were heat labile, inhibited by 0.1% sodium taurocholate and insensitive to inactivation by divalent cations such as zinc and cobalt. Only the acidic, lysosomal form was able .89. 2 Na 3.33:8 as 26 .3931 2 SS :3 83.536 86 652 gm: 866562 e .mfi 26 on 6626:6362 gm: 6863666 0 82:2 3.6 a 862 2 3.0 965828 6.6 26 .8263“. 2.. mm 5 53336 86 65.»... 8665622 2 .EUHAXHGH HQ.— umz m 33 «ms m... omé 686.3 a 686: 65.5 :65: «62 m... me... 68.0.3 6 866m 3566 :65: 6332 63 3th 22 22 36:26 582 R: 6.4- 22 . 22 .853 :83 668.6» mm: NJ 3...“ 968.2. 626036 2852 SH 6... mz 622 .832 32 £5.56 Eon HEM! 34 6.6 26 46265.2. 2 66.6 5 2568056 566 6566 66665666 2 5.6 =6 3653696626 .568 2 8.6 5 83.556 86 659. 8695.66 6 5 88.5556 n6 656: 865662 6 6666369229le no flow 3956063125: 6:» 3263962 8.6 HQ um 6256063 65. n 686068681226 6666.655 668.65 .832 665 o3. 22 686.6: 56 858 565 22 8.78.... 068.5 a 86.65 .655 686 6.6 3.365 2: 6.6 .36. 88E 8.6 22 .6655 636 6.6 $265 65 6.6 66.6 . .8065 8.6 22 .6632 286 «5 6.66.6 22 622 .655 686 g .286 .2666! 26 as 222662! H6286 35 68.868 no: 222 6 86:66.6 «5 6.6 2.8365 66.6 .666 5325. 6666 66.6666 665 6.6 2.8.686 66.6 .666 5662 668 266.665 66666.6 665 6.6 .666 .66.6 26.6.2 686 66 6.6 22 26:52 686 5566 .586 E 6668535 222662! 29256 68.56665 no: .22 6 .33366 0306556656 .50 20333523 won A 356565666 6 36 665 22 226 «.mufi: 6626:6626 22 22 65.56 6952 665 £6 6.6an 63:652.... .665 22 is 26165 6626:6626 22 22 .5566 665.52 26 66V 668856.533 6565.6 665 22 26 16:66: 6626:6455 22 in 8 5666:6626 55>me 6622 as. 6. V 2576:5136 665 22 E: 6.6:. v 6626:6626 22 22 .5635 :65: in 6: 230654536626 56 6: 555652698626 5: 65v .6626 366.8 222 56 .162 N65 22 in ~ . muss: 6276:6626 22:6 22 56 18 6650656 2952 $66 6626:5652 265.2 662759356552 6.... 8 1+6: 665 66 A 65. a... 6:26: 5666:6666 622 .26 8 +66 595.5 662 55.565.258.66 66555866 .5525! 26....-. 3... 26656556562 «26.55.55.556: 29266 .gfiggaénfig JUL—"g 37 .35558 6558.268 60 556.9586 562:6 .5 m 6 555566 05622.26 66 8555525 666 :65 A 2556.856 6 356.8 665:2 8.65.5.5. 22: 33 5.565656 622 666 5.852 22: 33 5962698566266 625 6.556 366566.626 £6 6.66 6506 658566.565: 52:66:66 £6 652 5652:6656 6626:6652 6.6 5.6V 5226.626 625 652 +62 .5635 665 22 6626:6626 £6 652 16.6 E: 65. +62 656 66566 665 22 Estate 22 22 56.525. 586 35 2626:6121. 56.56 65 £65.66 22 6656:6626 22 22 28652 536 2656 66535606053565: 2666 0585665652 66056526766505.6153 565 6676:6624 $5 .66 .3785 66 A 65. 66.. 6.61.626 $6.65 022 36596995. .5586 5.25.5 5.86 26.55.525.36 6.6.533 626655525525 29266 snag nIH HE 38 to hydrolyze the NaB[3H]4 reduced trisaccharide substrate, Manfil-4GlcNAcfl[3H]GlcNAc. Both forms of the enzyme, however, were able to hydrolyze the synthetic, non- physiological substrate, PNP-B-D-Man. Comparable fractionation of liver from fi-mannosidosis goats had normal levels of the neutral form but no detectable amount of the acidic form. This is interpretated as evidence for the presence, in control goat liver, of both lysosomal (acidic) and cytosolic (neutral) B-mannosidases. Pearce gt a; (110) also reported that both the adult and neonatal livers, from controls and goats with B-mannosidosis, contained the neutral isozyme which is absent in non-hepatic tissues such as kidney and brain. Neutral, non-lysosomal enzymes, capable of hydrolyzing the non-physiological aryl a-D- or fi-D-glycosides, have been detected in mammalian tissues (e.g., liver, spleen and kidney) (108,110,141,165-181) as well as in liver from humans with a-mannosidosis (141,165), Gaucher's disease (166,168,170,180) and GMl-gangliosidosis (169,181). The biochemical role(s) of these neutral glycosidases is(are) unknown. It is postulated that a broad specificity, neutral B-glucosidase, purified from guinea pig liver, may be involved in the metabolism of xenobiotic compounds (172). The two forms of goat liver fi-mannosidase have been partially purified using (NH4)2804 fractionation and anion exchange and Sephadex G-150 chromatographies (158). The 39 lysosomal form was unstable and purified only 5-fold with a 3% yield. The enzyme had a molecular weight of 127,000 2 10,000 Da, as determined by gel filtration, and an isoelectric point of pH 6-7. When assayed using 4-MU-B-D- Man, B-mannosidase activity was unchanged by the inclusion of Triton X-100 (0.1%) or cysteine (20 mM) in the assay medium. The enzyme hydrolyzed the presumed di- and tri- saccharide substrates purified from fi-mannosidosis goat tissues. Lysosomal fi-mannosidase has also been partially purified from normal goat kidney (K.T. Cavanagh, unpublished data). Purification techniques included heat fractionation and Con A-Sepharose, Sephadex G-150 and CM- Sephadex chromatographies. Use of this protocol resulted in a 118-fold purification of the enzyme with a yield of 42%. A gene controlling B-mannosidase activity in the house mouse (Mug Musculus) has been localized to the distal arm of chromosome 3 (182). The gene has a major effect on fi-mannosidase activity, in kidney and liver, when assayed with the synthetic substrate, PNP-B-D-Man. The gene was mapped to chromosome 3 by demonstration of linkage to several genes, including one for cadmium resistance, in recombinant inbred strains. The mouse is the only mammal to date where the gene coding for B-mannosidase activity has been localized. LIST OF REFERENCES 10. VII. LIST OF REFERENCES Stanbury, J.B., Wyngaarden, J.B., Fredrickson, D.S., Goldstein, J.L. and Brown, M.S. (1983) in The Metabolic Basis of Inherited Disease (Stanbury, J.B., Wyngaarden, J.B., Fredrickson, D.S., Goldstein, J.L. and Brown, M.S., eds) pp. 3-59, McGraw Hill, New York. Garrod, A.E. (1908) Lancet 2, 1-7, 73-84, 142- 148, 214-220. Beadle, G. W. and Tatum, E.L. (1941) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 21, 499-506. Pauling, L., Itano. H.A., Singer, S.J. and Wells, I.C. (1949) Science 110, 543-548. Ingram, V.M. (1956) Nature 17g, 792-794. Hers, H.G. (1965) Gastroenterology 48, 625-633. Glew, R.H., Basu, A., Prence, E. M. and Ramaley, A.T. (1985) Lab. Invest. 52, 250-269. Kornfeld, S. and Sly, W.S. (1985) Hospital Practice 29, 71-82. Desnick, R.J. and Sweeley, C.C. (1983) in The Metabolic Basis of Inherited Disease (Stanbury, J.B., Wyngaarden, J.B., Fredrickson, D.S., Goldstein, J.L. and Brown, M.S., eds) pp. 906- .944, McGraw Hill, New York. O'Brien, J.S. (1983) in The Metabolic Basis of Inherited Disease (Stanbury, J.B., Wyngaarden, J.B., Fredrickson, D.S., Goldstein, J.L. and Brown, M.S., eds) pp. 957-962, McGraw Hill, New York. 40 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 41 Williams, J.C. and Howell, R.R. (1983) in The Metabolic Basis of Inherited Disease (Stanbury, J.B., Wyngaarden, J.B., Fredrickson, D.S., Goldstein, J.L. and Brown, M.S., eds) pp. 141- 166, McGraw Hill, New York. Brady, R.O. and Barranger, J.A. (1983) in The Metabolic Basis of Inherited Disease (Stanbury, J.B., Wyngaarden, J.B., Fredrickson, D.S., Goldstein, J.L. and Brown, M.S., eds) pp. 842- 856, McGraw Hill, New York. deDuve, C., Pressman, B.C., Giametto, R., Wattiaux, R. and Appelmans, F. (1955) Biochem. J. go, 604-617. Srivastava, S.K. (1977) in Practical Enzymology of the Sphingolipidoses (Glew, R.H. and Peters, S.B., eds) pp. 217-246, Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York. O'Brien, J.S., deWet, J., Fukushima, H., Wilcox, E., Dewji, N., McGee, J., Warner, T., Yoshida, A., Fluharty, A., Hill, F. and Helinski, D. (1984) in Molecular Basis of Lysosomal Storage Disorders (Barranger, J.A. and Brady, R.O., eds) pp. 387-403, Academic Press, Inc., New York. Nora, J.J. and Fraser, F.C. (1989) Medical Genetics: Principles and Practice, Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia. Glossl, J., Truppe, W. and Kresse, J. (1979) Biochem. J. 181, 37-46. von Figura, K. (1977) Eur. J. Biochem. 80, 525- 533. Warner, T.G., Dambach, L.M., Shin, J.H. and O'Brien, J.S. (1980) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 3;, 869-879. ’ Draper, R.R., Fiskum, G.M. and Edmond, J. (1976) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 177, 525-538. McGovern, M.M., Vine, D.T., Haskins, M.E. and Desnick, R.J. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 12605- 12610. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 42 McGovern, M.M., Aula, P. and Desnick, R.J. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 10743-10747. Contractor, S.F., Mason, R.M. and Oakey, M. (1982) Placenta 3, 45-56. Alhadeff, J.A., Miller, A.L., Wenass, H., Vedick, T. and O'Brien, J.S. (1975) J. Biol. Chem. 250, 7106-7113. Bishop, D.F. and Desnick, R.J. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256, 1307-1316. Calhoun, D.H., Bishop, D.F., Bernstein, H.S., Quinn, M., Hantzopoulous, P. and Desnick, R.J. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82, 7364- 7368. Kusiak, J.W., Quirk, J.H., Brady, R.O. and Mook, G.E. (1978) J. Biol. Chem. 253, 184-190. Lo, J.T., Mukerji, K., Awasthi, Y.C., Hanada, E., Suzaki, K. and Srivastava, S.K. (1979) J. Biol. Chem. 254 6710-6715. Strasberg, P.M., Lowden, J.A. and Mahuran, D. (1982) Can. J. Biochem. 60, 1025-1031. Brot, F.E., Bell, G.E. and Sly, W.S. (1978) Biochem. 11, 385-391. deBarsey, T., Jacquemin, P., Devos, P. and Hers, H.-G. (1972) Eur. J. Biochem. 31, 156- 165. Jones, C.S., Shankaran, P., Davidson, D.J., Poulos, A. and Callahan, J. W. (1983) Biochem. J. 229, 291-297. Geiger, B. and Arnon, R. (1976) Biochem. 15, 3484-3493. O'Dowd, B.F., Quan, F., Willard, H.F., Lamhonwah, A-M, Korneluk, R.G., Lowden, J.A., Gravel, R.A. and Mahuran, D.J. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82, 1184-1188. Frost, R.G., Holmes, E.W., Norden, A.G.W. and O'Brien, J.S. (1978) Biochem. J. 175, 181-188. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 43 Dale, G.L., Beutler, E., Fournier, P., Blanc, P. and Liautaud, J. (1980) in Enzyme Therapy in Genetic Diseases, Vol. 2 (Desnick, R.J., ed), pp. 33-34, Alan R. Liss, New York. Dinur, T., Osiecki, K.M., Legler, G., Gatt, S., Desnick, R.J. and Grabowski, G.A. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. SCi.‘U.S.A. 81, 1660-1664. Alhadeff, J.A. and Freeze, H. (1977) Mol. Cell. Biochem. 18, 33-37. Bohrborn, W. and von Figura, K. (1978) J. Physiol. Chem. 888, 1353-1362. Sweeley, C.C., LeDonne, N.C. and Robbins, P.W. (1983) Arch. Biochem. Biochys. 223, 158-165. LeDonne, N.C., Fairley, J.L. and Sweeley, C.C. (1983) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 824, 186-195. Takahashi, T., Schmidt, P.G. and Tang, J. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 2819-2830. Takahashi, S., Murray, G.S., Furbish, F.S., Brady, R.O., Barranger, J.A. and Kobata, A. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 252, 10112-10117. Fukushima, H., deWet, J.R. and O'Brien, J.S. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82, 1262- 1265. Sorge, J., West, C., Westwood, B. and Beutler, E. (1985) Proc. Natl} Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 88, 7289-7293. Correction of: Sorge, J., West, C., Westwood, B. and Beutler, E. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 3567. Ginns, E.I., Choudary, P.V., Martin, B.M., Winfield, S., Stubblefield, 8., Mayor, J., Merkle-Lehman, D., Murray, G.J., Bowers, L.A. and Barranger, J.A. (1984) Biophys. Res. Commun. 188, 574-580. Sorge, J., Gelbart, T., West, C., Westwood, B. and Beutler, E. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82, 5442-5445. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 44 Tsuji, S., Choudary, P.V., Martin, B.M., Winfield, S., Barranger, J.A. and Ginns, E.I. (1986) J. 3161. Chem. 261. 50-53. Ginns, E.I., Choudary, P.V., Tsuji, S., gt 8; (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 7101- 7105. Tsuji, S., Choudary, P.V., Martin, B.M. gt 31 (1987) N. Engl. J. Med. 386, 570-575. Proia, R.L. and Soravia, E. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 888, 5677-5681. Graves, P.N., Grabowski, G.A., Ludman, M.D., Palese, P. and Smith, F.I. (1986) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 88, 763-774. Segundo, B.S., Chan, S.J. and Steiner, D.F. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 2320- 2324. Myerowitz, R. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 88, 3955-3959. Arpaia, E., Dumbrille-Ross, A., Maler, T., Neote, K., Tropak, M. and Troxel, C. (1988) Nature 888, 85-86. Joseph, L.J., Chang, L.C., Stamenkovich, D. and Sukatme, P. (1988) J. Clin. Invest. 8;, 1621- 1629. ‘ Grahm, T.R., Zassenhaus, H.P. and Kaplan, A. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 888, 16823-16829. Wigderson, M., Firon, N., Horowitz, 2., Wilder, S., Frishberg, Y., Reiner, O. and Horowitz, M. (1989) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 88, 365-377. Bishop, D.F., Kornreich, R. and Desnick, R.J. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 88, 3903-3907. Wenger, D.A., Sattler, M. and Roth, S. (1982) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 118, 639-649. Li, S.-C. and Li, Y.-T. (1976) J. Biol. Chem. 281, 1159-1163. Conzelman, E. and Sandhoff, K. (1978) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 18, 3979-3983. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71. 72. 73. 74. 75. 76. 77. 45 Li, S.-C., Kihara, H., Serizawa, S., Li, Y.-T., Fluharty, A.L., Mayes, J.S. and Shapiro, L.J. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 1867-1871. Jatzkewitz, H. and Stinshoff, K. (1973) Febs. Lett. 82, 129-131. Ho, M.W. and O'Brien, J.S. (1971) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 2810-2813. Peters, S.P., Coyle, P., Coffee, C.J., Glew, R.H., Kuhlenschmidt, M.S., Rosenfeld, L. and Lee, Y.C. (1976) J. Biol. Chem. 85 , 563-573. Basu, A., Glew, R.H., Daniels, L.B. and Clark, L.S. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 1714-1719. Gilbert, W. (1985) Science 288, 823-824. Brady, R. O. (1984) in Molecular Basis of Lysosomal Storage Disorders (Barranger, J.A. and Brady, R.O., eds) pp. 461-478, Academic Press, Inc, New York. Desnick, R.J., McGovern, M.M., Schuchman, E.H. and Haskins, M.E. (1982) in Animal Models of Inherited Metabolic Diseases (Desnick, R.J., Patterson, T.D.F. and Scarpelli D.G., eds) pp. 27-65, Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York. Brady, R.O. and Barranger, J.A. in Molecular Basis of Lysosomal Storage Disorders (Barranger, J.A. and Brady, R.O. eds) pp. 481- 493, Academic Press, Inc., New York. Desnick, J.R., Thorpe, S.R. and Fiddler, M.E. (1976) Physiolo. Rev. 88, 57-99. Beutler, E., Dale, G.L., Guinto, E. and Kuhl W. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 18, 4620- 4630. Belchetz, P.E., Braidman, I.P., Crawley, J.C.W. and Gregoriadis, G. (1979) Lancet 8, 116-117. Desnick, R.J., Dean, K.J., Grabowski, G., Bishop, D.F. and Sweeley, C.C. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 18, 5326-5330. Brady, R.O., Pentchev, P.G., Gal, A.E., Hibbert, S.R. and Dekaban, A.S. (1974) N. Engl. J. Med. 291, 989-905. 78. 79. 80. 81. 82. 83. 84. 85. 86. 87. 88. 89. 46 von Specht, B.U., Geiger, B., Armon, R., Passell, J., Keren, G., Goldman B. and Padeh, B. (1979) Neurol. 28, 849-856. Rattazzi, M.C., Appel, A.M. and Baker, H.J. (1980) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 32. 51A. Gasper, P.W., Thrall, M.A., Wenger, D.A., Macy, D.W., Ham, L., Dornsife, R.E., MeBiles, K., Quakenbush, S.L., Kesee, M.L., Gillette, E.L. and Hoover, R.A. (1984) Nature 888, 467-469. Schull, R.M., Hastings, N.E., Selcer, R.R., Jones, J.B., Smith, G.R., Cullen, W.C., and Constantopoulos, G. (1987) J. Clin. Inves. 88, 435-443. Rappeport, J.M. and E.I. Ginns (1984) N. Engl. J. Med. 38;, 84-88. Bayever, E., Ladiseh, M., Philippart, M., Brill, N., Newer, M., Sparkes, R. and Feig, S. (1985) Lancet g, 471-473. Krivit, W., Pierpont, M.E., Ayaz, K., Tsai, M., Ranpey, K.C., Kersey, J.H., Weisdorf, S., Sibley, R., Snover, D., McGovern, M., Schwartz, M.F. and Desnick, R.J. (1984) N. Engl. J. Med. 811, 1606-1611. Hobbs, J.R., Hugh-Jones, K., Barrett, A.J., Byrom, N., Chambers, D., Henry, K., James, D.C.O., Lucas, C.F., Rogers, T.R., Benson, D.R., Tansley, L.R., Patrick, A.D., Mossman, J. and Young, E.P. (1981) Lancet 8, 709-712. Taylor, R.M., Farrow, B.R.H., Stewart, G.J., Healy, P.J. and Tiver, K. (1987) Transplant. Proc. 818, 2730-2734. Yeager, A.M., Brennan, S., Tiffany, C., Moser, H.W. and Santos, G.W. (1984) Science 225, 1052- 1054. ~ Seller, M.J., Perkins, K.J. and Fensom, A.H. (1986) J. Inher. Metab. Dis. 8, 234-238. Sakiyama, T., Tsuda, M., Owada, M., Joh, K., Miyawaki, S. and Kitagawa (1983) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1;8, 605-610. 90. 91. 92. 93. 94. 95. 96. 97. 98. 99. 100. 101. 102. 47 Sakigama, T., Tsuda, M., Owada, M., Kitagawa, T., Miyawaki, S., Shinagawa, T. and Tadokoro, M. (1986) J. Inher. Metab. Dis. 8, 305-308. Taylor, R.M., Stewart, G.J., Farrow, B.R.H. and Healy, P.J. (1986) Lancet 8, 772-773. Pyeritz, R.E. (1984) Nature 888, 405-406. Taylor, R.M., Farrow, B.R.H. and Stewart, G.J. (1986) Transplant. Proc. 88, 326-329. Hugh-Jones, K., Hobbs, J., Chambers, D., White, S., Byrom, N., Williamson, S., Barrett, J. and Henry, K. (1984) in Molecular Basis of Lysosomal Storage Disorders (Barranger, J.A. and Brady, R.O. eds) pp. 412-428, Academic Press, Inc., New York. Ginns, E.I., Caplan, D.B., Rappeport, J.M. and Barranger, J.A. (1984) in Molecular Basis of Lysosomal Storage Disorders (Barranger, J.A. and Brady, R.O. eds) pp. 429-440, Academic Press, Inc., New York. Svennerholm, L., Mansson, J.-E., Nilsson, O. and Tibblin, E. (1984) in Molecular Basis of Lysosomal Storage Disorders (Barranger, J.A. and Brady, R.O., eds) pp. 441-439, Academic Press, Inc., New York. Sorge, J., Kuhl, W., West, C. and Beutler, E. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 88, 906- 909. Palmer, T.D., Hock, R.A., Osborne, W.R.A. and Miller, A.D. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 88, 1055-1059. Snider, M.D. (1984) in Biology of Carbohydrates, Volume 2 (Ginsburg, V. and Robbins, P.W., eds), pp. 163-198, John Wileys & Sons, New York. Kornfeld, R. and Kornfeld, S. (1985) Ann. Rev. Biochem. 88, 631-664. von Figura, K. and Hasilik, A. (1986) Ann. Rev. Biochem. 88, 167-193. Hirschberg, C.B. and Snider, M.D. (1987) Ann. Rev. Biochem, 88, 63-87. 103. 104. 105. 106. 107. 108. 109. 110. 111. 112. 113. 114. 115. 116. 48 Pfeffer, S.R. and Rothmann, J.E. (1987) Ann. Rev. Biochem. 88, 829-852. Elbein, A.D. (1987) Ann. Rev. Biochem. 88, 497- 534. Jones, M.Z. and Dawson, G. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 5181-5188. I.A. and 504-507. P.J., Seaman, J.T., Gardner, (1981) Aust. Vet. J. 81, Healy, Sewell, C.A. Jones, M.Z. and Laine, R.A. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 5181-5184. Dawson, G. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 3369- 3371. - Jones, M.Z., Rathke, E.J.S., Cavanagh, K. and Hancock, L.W. (1984) J. Inher. Metab. Dis. 1, 80-95. Pearce, R.D., Callahan, J.W., Little, P.B., Armstrong, D.K. and Clarke, J.T.R. (1987) Biochem. J. 118, 603-609. Cavanagh, K., Dunstan, R.W. and Jones, M.Z. (1982) Am. J. Vet. Res. 38, 1058-1059. Hancock, L.W., Jones, M.Z. and Dawson, G. (1986) Biochem. J. 23 , 175-183. Jones, M.Z., Cunningham, J.G., Dade, A.W., Alessi, D.M., Mostosky, U.V., Vorro, J.R., Benitez, J.T. and Lovell, R.L. (1983) J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 31, 268-285. Jones, M.Z., Cunningham, J.G., Dade, A.W., Dawson, G., Laine, R.A., Williams, C.S.F., Alessi, D.M., Mostosky, U.V. and Vorro, J.R. (1982) in Animal Models of Inherited Diseases (Desnick, R.J., Patterson, D.F. and Scarpelli, D.G., eds) pp. 165-176, Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York. ‘ Hartley, W.J. and Blakemore, W.F. Neuropathol. (Berl) 28, 325-333. (1973) Acta Lovell, R.L. and Jones, M.Z. (1983) Acta Neuropathol. (Berl) 82, 121-126. 117. 118. 119. 120. 121. 122. 123. 124. 125. 126. 127. 128. 129. 130. 131. 49 Lovell, R.L. and Jones, M.Z. (1985) Acta Neuropathol. (Berl) 88, 293-299. Kumar, K., Jones, M.Z., Cunningham, J.G., Kelley, J.A. and Lovell, K.L. (1986) Vet. Record 888, 325-327. Lynn, G.E., Benitez, J.T., Jones, M.Z. and Lovell, R.L. (1985) J. Neuropathol. & Exp. Neurol. 45, 352- Frei, J.I., Matsuura, F. and Jones, M.Z. Fed. Proc. 88, 1553. Frei, J.I., Matsuura, F., Rathke, E.J.S. and Jones, M.Z. (1986) Fed. Proc. 88, 1815. (1984) Matsuura, F., Laine, R.A. and Jones, M.Z. (1981) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 888, 485-493. Matsuura, F. and Jones, M.Z. Biol. Chem. 28 , 15239-15245. Dahl, D.L., Warren, Jones, M.Z. (1986) J. 98. (1985) J. C.D., Rathke, E.J.S. and Matsuura, P., Jones, M.Z. and Frazier, S.E. (1983) Biochem. Biophys. Acta 782, 67-73. Malachowski, J.A. and Jones, M.Z. Neuropathol. (Berl) 88, 95-100. (1983) Acta Wenger, D.A., Sujanski, E., Fennessey, P.V. and Thompson, J.N. (1986) N. Engl. J. Med. 888, 1201-1205. Cooper, A., Sardharwalla, I.B. and Roberts, M.M. (1986) N. Engl. J. Med. 888, 1231. Cooper, A., Hatton, C. and Sardharwalla, 1.8. (1987) J. Inher. Metab. Dis. 88, 229-233. Cooper, A., Hatton, C., Thornley, M. and Sardharwalla, I;B. (1988) J. Inher. Metab. Dis. 81, 17-29. Kobata, A. (1984) in Biology of Carbohydrates, Volume 2 (Ginsburg, V. and Robbins, P.W., eds) pp. 87-161, John Wiley & Sons, New York. 132. 133. 134. 135. 136. 137. 138. 139. 140. 141. 142. 143. 144. .so Beaudet, A.L. (1983) in The Metabolic Basis of Inherited Disease (Stanbury, J.B., Wyngaarden, W.B., Fredrickson, D.S., Goldstein, J.L. and Brown, M.S., eds) pp. 788-802, McGraw Hill, New York. O'Brien, J.S. (1983) in The Metabolic Basis of Inherited Disease (Stanbury, J.B., Wyngaarden, J.B., Fredrickson, D.S., Goldstein, J.L. and Brown, M.S., eds) pp. 945-969, McGraw Hill, New York. Warner, T.G. and O'Brien, J.S. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 224-232. Burditt, L.T., Chotai, K., Hirani, S., Nugent, P.G., Winchester, B. and Blakemore, W.F. (1980) Biochem. J. 888, 467-473. Abraham, D., Blakemore, W.F., Jolly, R.D., Sidebotham, R. and Winchester, B. (1983) Biochem. J. 288, 573-579. Cantz, M., Gehler, J. and Spranger, J. (1977) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 11, 732-738. Durand, P., Borrone, C. and Della Cella, G. (1969) J. Pediat. 18, 665-674. Okada, S. and O'Brien, J.S. (1968) Science 160, 1002-1004. Sandhoff, K., Harzer, K., Wassle, W. and Jatzkewitz, H. (1971) J. Neurochem. 88, 2469- 2489. Autio, S., Norden, N.E., Ockerman, P.-A., Riekkinen, P., Rapola, J. and Louheimo, T. (1973) Acta Pediat. Scand. 82, 555-565. Palo, J., Riekkinen, P., Arstila, A.U., Autio, S. and Kivimaki, T. (1972) Acta Neuropath. 28, 217-224. Baker, H.J., Lindsey, J.R., McKhann, G.M. and Farrell, D.F. (1971) Science 873, 838-839. Cork, L.C., Munnell, J.F., Lorenz, M.D., Murphy, J.V., Baker, H.J. and Rattazzi, M.C. (1977) Science 888, 1014-1017. 145. 146. 147. 148. 149. 150. 151. 152. 153. 154. 155. 156. 157. 158. 159. 51 Phillips, N.C., Robinson, D., Winchester, B.G. and Jolly, R.D. (1974) Biochem. J. 131, 363- 371. ' Raghavan, S., Stuer, G., Riviere, L., Alroy, J. and Kolodny, E.H. (1988) J. Inher. Metab. Dis. 88, 3-16. Sugahara, K., Okumura, T. and Yamashina, I. (1972) Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 268, 488-496. Muramatsu, T. and Egami, F. (1967) J. Biochem. 82, 700-709. Reese, E.T. and Shibata, Y. (1965) Can. J. Microbiol. 88, 167-183. Houston, C.W., Latimer, 8.3. and Mitchel, E.D. (1974) Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 268, 488-496. Li, Y.-T. and Lee, Y.-C. (1972) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 3677-3683. Bouquelet, S., Spik, G. and Montreuil, J. (1978) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 822, 521-530. Elbein, A.D., Adya, S. and Lee, Y.C. (1977) J. Biol. Chem. 282,'2026-2031. Wan, C.C., Muldrey, J.E., Li, S.-C. and Li, Y.- T. (1976) J. Biol. Chem. 288, 4384-4388. McCleary, B.V. (1983) Carbohydrate Res. 811, 297-310. Sukeno, T., Tarentino, A.L., Plummer, T.H. and Haley, F. (1972) Biochem. 88, 1493-1501. Labadie, J.H. and Aronson, N.N. (1973) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 828, 603-614. Cavanagh, K.T., Fischer, R.A., Legler, G., Herrchen, M., Jones, M.Z., Julich, E., Sewell- Alger, R.P., Sinnott, M.L. and Wilkinson, F.E. (1985) Enzyme 31. 75-82. Noeske, C. and Mersmann, G. (1983) Hoppe- Seyler's Z. Physiol. Chem. 881, 1645-1651. 160. 161. 162. 163. 164. 165. 166. 167. 168. 169. 170. 171. 172. 173. 174. 52 Chester, M.A. and Ockerman, P.-A. (1981) in Proc. 6th Int. Sympos. on Glycoconjugates (Yamakawa, T., Osawa, T. and Honda, S., eds) p. 208, Japan Sci. Soc. Press, Tokyo. Bernard, M., Sioud, M., Percheron, F. and Foglietti, M.J. (1986) Int. J. Biochem. 88, 1065-1068. Kyosaka, S., Murata, S., Nakamura, F. and Tanaka, M. (1985) Chem. Pharm. Bull. Toyoko 88, 256-263. Bartholomew, B.A. and Perry, A.L. (1973) Biochim. Biphys. Acta 885, 123-127. Panday, R.S., Van Diggelen, 0.P., Klujer, W.J. and Niermeijer, M.F. (1984) J. Inher. Metab. Dis. 1, 155-156. Phillips, N.C., Robinson, D. and Winchester, B.G. (1976) Biochem. J. 853, 579-587. Carrol, M., Dance, N., Masson, P.K., Robinson, D. and Winchester, B. (1972) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 88, 579-583. Glew, R.H., Peters, S.P. and Christopher, A.R. (1976) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 422, 179-199. Peters, S.P., Coyle, P. and Glew, R.H. (1976) Arch. Biochem. BiOphys. 875, 569-582. Singer, H.S. and Schafer, I.A. (1972) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 28, 454-463. Daniels, L.B., Coyle, P.J., Chiao, Y.-B., Glew, R.H. and Labow, R.S. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256, 13004-13013.~ LaMarco, R.L. and Glew, R.H. (1985) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 288, 669-676. LaMarco, R.L. and Glew, R.H. (1986) Biochem. J. 287, 469-476. Robinson, D., Price, R.G. and Dance, N. (1967) Biochem. J. 882,,525-532. Abrahams, H.E. and Robinson, D. (1969) Biochem. J. 888, 749-755. 175. 176. 177. 178. 179. 180. 181. 182. 53 Llanillo, M., Perez, N. and Cabezas, J.A. (1977) Int. J. Biochem, 8, 557-564. Mellor, J.D. and Layne, D.S. (1974) J. Biol. Chem. 242, 361-365. Dance, N., Price, R.G., Robinson, D. and Stirling, J.L. (1969) Clin. Chim. Acta 28, 189- 197. Chester, M.A., Hultberg, B. and Ockerman, P.-A. (1976) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 429, 517-526. Ben-Yoseph, Y., Shapira, E., Edelman, D., Burton, B.K. and Nadler, H.L. (1977) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 184, 373-379. Owada, M., Sakiyama, T. and Kitagawa, T. (1977) Pediat. ReS. 88, 641-646. Norden, A.G.W. and O'Brien, J.S. (1974) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 88, 193-198. Ludin, G. (1987) Biochem. Genet. 28, 603-610. ABSTRACT PARTIAL PURIFICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF GOAT KIDNEY LXSOSOHAL fl-HANNOSIDASE CHAPTER 2 Conditions for stabilizing caprine lysosomal fi- mannosidase were determined and the enzyme was isolated from normal goat kidney and partially purified 11,500-fold, to a specific activity of 80,500 units/mg protein, and with a 3% yield. The 38,000 x g supernatant, of the homogenized tissue, was heat denatured (50°C) and then fractionated with (NH4)2802 (0-50%). Chromatographic steps included Con A-Sepharose, Sephadex G-150 and FPLC cation and anion exchange and gel filtration. The 11,500-fold pure sample was analysed by silver-stained SDS-PAGE and approximately ten bands were observed. After slab gel isoelectric focusing, a broad band of fi-mannosidase activity was detected between pH 5.5-6.5. This is the first report of a highly purified lysosomal B-mannosidase from goat tissue. 54 55 I. INTRODUCTION Lysosomal B-D-mannosidase (EC 3.2.1.25) hydrolyzes fi- mannopyranoside-N-acetylglucosamine linkages in the core structure of the N-linked oligosaccharides of glycopeptides and glycoproteins. Genetic disorders associated with deficient activity of lysosomal fi-mannosidase have been described in goats (1-4) and recently in humans (5,6). Caprine B-mannosidosis is a well documented, lethal, lysosomal storage disorder (1,3,7-12). Affected goats are characterized by severe neurological deficits associated with myelin abnormalities and accumulation of the disaccharide, Manfil-4G1cNAc, and trisaccharide, Manfil- 4GlcNAcBl-4G1cNAc, in tissues and urine (3,7,9,10). A mixture of two tetrasaccharides and the pentasaccharide, ManBl-4G1cNAcB1-4ManBl-4G1cNAcfi1-4GlcNAc accumulate to a lesser extent (12). fi-Mannosidase has been partially purified and incompletely characterized from several mammalian sources (13-19) and the reported yield, stability and activity are low in sources other than guinea pig liver, from which the enzyme was purified to electrophoretic homogeneity (20). D 56 II. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM The major objectives of this study were to purify lysosomal fl-mannosidase from normal goat kidney and to characterize the purified enzyme.) The purification of lysosomal fi-mannosidase was undertaken to make possible reliable biochemical and immunological studies of the defective enzyme in the disease state. The characterization of caprine lysosomal fi-mannosidase is critical not only to provide information on its role in the regulation of glycoprotein catabolism but also to determine the specific nature of the enzyme defect, especially in humans. Homogeneous or highly purified enzyme is crucial and necessary for characterization studies, amino acid and carbohydrate analyses, peptide sequencing and monoclonal and/or polyclonal antibody production. These antibodies could be used to further purify the enzyme and aid in the study of the biosynthesis of fi-mannosidase. Furthermore, monoclonal and/or polyclonal antibodies and oligonucleotide probes can be used to identify and isolate the gene(s) encoding lysosomal B-mannosidase. A purification scheme for goat kidney lysosomal fi- mannosidase, incorporating FPLC, is described. Kidney tissue was chosen for study because it is free of a separate, non-lysosomal fi-mannosidase activity (4,14). Selected physical and kinetic properties are also 57 presented. This is the first report of a procedure yielding highly purified lysosomal fi-mannosidase from goat tissue Preliminary results were presented (18,19). III. 58 IHATERIALS AND METHODS A. MATERIALS Goat kidney tissue was stored at -20°C. Con A- Sepharose, Sephadex G-150, phenyl-Sepharose CL—4B, methyl-a-D-mannopyranoside (Grade III), 4-MU-fi-D-Man, ammonium persulfate, NaN3, Coomassie blue, BSA (Fraction V, 96-99% albumin) and molecular weight standards for SDS-PAGE (MW-SDS-200) were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo. Acrylamide, N,N-methylenebisacrylamide and SDS were from Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Richmond, CA. Leupeptin and pepstatin were obtained from Boehringer Mannheim Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN. Ultrafiltration membranes were purchased from Amicon, Danvers, MA. Ampholines were obtained from LKB Instruments, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD. The Gelcode Silver Staining System was purchased from Pierce Chemical Company, Rockford, IL. The Mono S HR 10/10, Mono Q HR 5/5 and Superose 12 HR 10/30 columns were from Pharmacia Inc., Piscataway, NJ. Other reagents and chemicals were analytical grade. 59 METHODS 1. Enzyme Assay fi-Mannosidase activity was determined at pH 5.0 using 4-MU-fi-D-Man as previously described (3), except that the substrate solution contained 0.2 mg BSA (fraction V, 96-99%)/m1. One unit of enzyme activity was defined as that amount of enzyme which hydrolyzed 1 nmol of substrate/h at 37°C. 2. Protein Determination Protein concentration was estimated according to the method of Bradford (21) with BSA (Fraction V, 96-99%) as the standard. Protein eluting from columns was monitored by absorbance at 280 nm. 3. Electrophoresis The method of O'Farrell (22) was used for the SDS-PAGE analyses. The stacking and separating gels (1.5 mm) had polyacrylamide concentrations of 4% and 10%, respectively. The gels were run at 40 V for 14-16 h and stained using the Gelcode Silver Staining System. Flat bed isoelectric focusing was performed for 4800 V h at 4'C over pH ranges of either 4-7 or 5-7 in 5% polyacrylamide gels. Immediately after 60 focusing, the pH across the gel was determined with a surface electrode. Bands of enzyme activity were visualized after incubation at 42°C for 30—60 min, as described previously (16). 4. Fast Protein Liquid Chromatography A system including Pharmacia's gradient programmer GP-250, two P-500 pumps, a UV-l single path monitor and Mono S HR 10/10 (cation exchange) and Mono Q HR 5/5 (anion exchange) columns were used for FPLC. The solutions were prepared with triple deionized water, filtered with a 0.22 um-pore-size filter and degassed under vacuum before use. 5. High Speed Supernatant Preparation Thawed goat kidney tissue (80-100 g) was minced and homogenized with a Waring blender (30 sec x 3) in 1 volume of buffer A (50 mM NaCl/l mM MnC12/1 mM MgC12/10% (v/v) glycerol/ 10 mM sodium citrate, pH 5.5) containing 0.2 mg leupeptin/L and 0.7 mg pepstatin/L. The crude homogenate was centrifuged (38,000 g x 30 min) and the supernatant saved. The pellet was then resuspended twice in buffer A containing protease inhibitors and centrifuged as described above, and the three supernatant pools were 61 combined. All procedures were carried out at 4°C except for the ultrafiltration, Con A- Sepharose chromatography and FPLC, which were conducted at room temperature. All buffers contained 0.02% NaN3 except those used for FPLC. 6. Concentration Selected column fractions were concentrated by ultrafiltration in an Amicon stirred cell using either a PM-10 or PM-30 membrane. 62 RESULTS A. RECOVERY AND STABILITY OF LMSOSOMAL B-MANNOSIDASE Good recovery and storage stability for goat kidney fi-mannosidase was obtained at pH 5.5 with 10% glycerol. For example, 90% recovery was obtained after 2 months storage at 4°C in 50 mM NaCl/10% (v/v) glycerol/10 mM sodium citrate buffer, pH 5.5. Thus, the reported B-mannosidase instability (15,16) that has hampered enzyme purification was significantly reduced. B. LESOSOMAL fl-MANNOSIDASE PURIFICATION The high speed supernatant was heated at 50°C for 10 min and occasionally stirred. The suspension was centrifuged (38,000 g x 30 min) and (NH4)ZSO4 was slowly added to the supernatant to a concentration of 50%. The suspension was centrifuged (38,000 g x 20 min) after stirring on ice for 1 h. The pellets were resuspended in buffer A containing protease inhibitors, pooled and stored at -20°C. Several tissue preparations, after (NH4)ZSO4 fractionation, were pooled to ensure sufficient enzyme activity at later stages. The dissolved (NH4)ZSO4-precipitated pellets were centrifuged (38,000 g x 20 min) and the supernatant was mixed with Con A-Sepharose (10-15 mg protein/ml gel) previously equilibrated in buffer A. After 2 h, the suspension was poured into a column 63 and washed with buffer A until the absorbance of the eluate at 280 nm was less than 0.05. The bound glycoproteins, including lysosomal fi-mannosidase, were then eluted (Figure 2-1) with 1.0 M methyl-a-D- mannopyranoside in buffer A containing 0.55 M NaCl. Fractions (5.8 ml) with the majority of enzyme activity were pooled, concentrated to about 10 ml and applied to a Sephadex G-150 column (120 cm x 4.5 cm) equilibrated with buffer B (50 mM NaCl/10% (v/v) glycerol/10 mM sodium citrate buffer, pH 5.5). Enzyme was eluted (Figure 2-2) at a flow rate of 20 ml/hr. Peak fractions (5.6 ml) were pooled, concentrated to about 8 ml and then chromatographed on a Mono S HR 10/10 column equilibrated with buffer B. Using a multi-step NaCl gradient, at a flow rate of 4.0 ml/min, B-mannosidase activity was eluted at 0.25 M NaCl, as a broad non-symmetrical peak (Figure 2-3). Peak fractions (3.0 ml) were pooled, dialyzed for 12-14 h against buffer C (20 mM Tris/HCl/20% (v/v) glycerol, pH 7.5) and then chromatographed on a Mono Q HR 5/5 column equilibrated with buffer C. Using a linear NaCl gradient, at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min, B-mannosidase activity was eluted at 80 mM NaCl as a single peak (Figure 2-4). The peak fractions (0.5 ml), from the Mono Q anion exchange step, were pooled, concentrated to less than 0.5 ml 64 FIGURE 2-1. CON A-SEPHAROSE CHROMATOGRAPHY OF 5- MANNOSIDASE. The dissolved (NH4)2SO4-precipitated pellets were centrifuged and then mixed with Con A-Sepharose (10-15 mg protein/ml gel) equilibrated in buffer A. After 2 h, the suspension was poured into a column and washed with buffer A until the absorbance of the eluate was less than 0.05 nm. The enzyme was then eluted with 1.0 M methyl-a-D-mannopyranoside in buffer A containing 0.55M NaCl. Fractions (5.8 ml) were monitored for absorbance at 280 nm (nun) and aliquots were assayed for fi-mannosidase activity (Ari). Pooled fractions are indicated by a bar. 65 2.0 12000- ~1.5 2 A 4 . t:\_OE$ >.—._>.PU< Q.._.<¢¢>N2w 1000- 100 FRACTION NUMBER 66 FIGURE 2-2. GEL FILTRATION OF B-MANNOSIDASE. Fractions from Con A-Sepharose chromatography, after concentration to 10 ml, were applied to a Sephadex G-150 column (120 cm x 4.5 cm) equilibrated with buffer B. Fractions (5.6 ml) were monitored for absorbance at 280 nm (Ono) and aliquots were assayed for fi-mannosidase activity (A——A). Pooled fractions are indicated by a bar. 67 2.0 >nmo :3 .0. 2000 1500'- _ m 1 1 $325.. >.:>Fo< o.»<2>~zm _ m 160 110 FRACTION NUMBER 68 FIGURE 2-3. FPLC CATION EXCHANGE CHROMATOGRAPHY OF 8- MANNOSIDASE. Concentrated fractions from Sephadex G-150 gel filtration were chromatographed on a Mono 8 HR 10/10 column equilibrated in buffer B. Enzyme (t—‘) was eluted with a multi-step NaCl gradient 0—0-9. The flow rate was 4 ml/min. Fractions (3 ml) were monitored for absorbance at 280 nm (---). Pooled fractions areindicated by a bar. 69 PERCENT IM NaCI I-°-) -1 so so 40 —« 20 ‘-_== ............................. g 2. o 8 N .- ( V) (MI/ION“) A.LIMIOV OIIVWAZNB ‘20 25 30 35 FRACTION NUMBER 15 IO 70 FIGURE 2-4. FPLC ANION EXCHANGE CHROMATOGRAPHY OF 8- MANNOSIDASE. Peak fractions from the FPLC cation exchange chromato- graphy were dialyzed against buffer C and then applied to a Mono Q HR 5/5 column equilibrated with the same buffer. B-Mannosidase activity (H) was eluted with a linear NaCl gradient (—-—) . The flow rate was 0.5 ml/min. Fractions (0.5 ml) were monitored for absorb- ance at 280 nm (---). Pooled fractions are indicated by a bar. 71 vmnomzd. :5 Zoo. Ti. "80 6 4 -20 1000- 6 ul" 'UU.'.'.-W"“"-' 5'11. ' o w A d . 3:355 >.—..>_._.U< U..—.<2>N2m I-..m“‘ ‘ "'--"-"||""""---‘ I 30 L 25 FRACTION NUMBER 1 20 72 and then 200 uL samples were chromatographed, at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min, on a Superose 12 HR 10/30 column. The elution buffer was 0.05 M sodium citrate-phosphate, pH 5.5, containing 0.1 M KCl and 20% (v/v) glycerol. Approximately eight protein peaks were resolved and only the first peak contained B-mannosidase activity. The peak fractions (0.5 ml), from this final chromatographic step, were pooled prior to further analyses. Approximately 10 bands were detected in samples of the pooled fraction after silver-stained SDS-PAGE (M. DuPuis, personal communication). The final preparation was, therefore, not homogeneous but was highly purified. Lysosomal B-mannosidase was purified 11,500-fold, to a specific activity of 80,500 units/mg protein, and with a 3% yield (Table 2-1). C. ISOELECTRIC POINT A broad band of fi-mannosidase activity, between pH 5.5-6.5, was observed after isoelectric focusing, with the most prominent activity at pH 5.5 and 6.1 (results not shown). 73 defined 5 9:336 can 916..” E 5.538 H33 «5 9:335 3 3:...qu mg imam 83556 85 OE... 5 55 .33» 8. 5 88865 .5505 2 gm 3.: min: 8328 H833 m8. :2 oi H89 a 98: m5 «0 E m; n .9: mi guanine .mpgmnsm m5 5.“: 3586 no 68ng mm: 3532 .88» 93 wow mfidumc E898 :3 mom a 3.2 m 398 866 om~.~ 395808.85 we mmpgm 69E mafie m «8.2. and as}: nafiflmoug o 08: GE «on; mm 8%: Tn 26...; 5E5 m 08: "8% new am on} R 138.8 5355 9:8 835m «.8 3 8n m3 2b.? 555 mmouflnwmuc :8 e; 3 92 63:. $18 Seugfig 482:3 womne Ede 3 x 0.08 he 8 93 25.2 ENS: 535355 5.3 E? on x m 8668 o; 2: o4. 63.8 amines 59595 55:52 E 35?. A». .6 USES. a! Eric 55% a g .5 E E fi.§§§§8§§ .HINNE 74 V. DISCUSSION A protocol including sequential Con A-Sepharose, Sephadex G-150 and FPLC cation and anion exchange and gel filtration chromatographies was used to prepare a highly purified goat kidney lysosomal B-mannosidase. Use of this protocol produced a specific activity of 80,500 units/mg of protein with a 3% yield and a 11,500-fold purification. Despite this high degree of purity, the enzyme was not homogenous as assessed by silver-stained SDS-PAGE. Some of the observed bands may arise from multiple forms of the enzyme that are associated with different stages of enzyme processing or degrees of proteolysis, since isoelectric focusing showed a broad band of B-mannosidase activity in the pH range 5.5 - 6.5. Pearce gt a; (4) also found multiple isoelectric points for goat B-mannosidase. Likewise, the broad, skewed peak of fi-mannosidase activity from FPLC cation exchange suggests that multiple enzyme forms are present in the enzyme preparations. Other bands in the SDS-PAGE gel may be caused by a variation in charge because of an uneven uptake of SDS by the enzyme as is often seen with glycoproteins (23). Nevertheless, other bands were derived from contaminants which did not possess fi-mannosidase activity. The partially purified enzyme hydrolyzed the accumulated di-, tri- and penta-saccharides (the presumed natural substrates) previously isolated from fi-mannosidosis 75 goat tissues (3,7,9,10,18,19). Interpretation of the substrate specificity studies suggests that goat kidney 3- mannosidase is more reactive towards the larger oligo- saccharides (e.g., penta- and tri-saccharides) than to the disaccharide, Manfil-4GlcNAc (19). Rat, human, and goat liver lysosomal fi-mannosidase give similar results (13,16,24). B-Mannosidase was unreactive towards a fi1-3 linked disaccharide as well as to an internal fil-4 linkage but the enzyme did hydrolyze a Bl-G linked disaccharide. These substrate specificity characteristics are consistent with the criteria for an "inverting" glycosidase (16,25). The apparent km, of partially purified goat kidney B- mannosidase, was 0.8 mm with the synthetic substrate 4-MU- fi-D-Man and 9.0 mM for PNP-fl-D-Man (19). In comparison, the km for the human serum enzyme using the p-nitrophenyl substrate was 2.2 mM (17) and the guinea pig liver enzyme demonstrated non—Michaelis-Menten kinetics (20). Recently, fi-mannosidase was purified from guinea pig liver using Con A—Sepharose, Sephadex G-200, GlcNAc-agarose and conventional anion and cation exchange chromatographies (20). An 8,000-fold purification with a 28% yield was obtained and it was judged to be homogeneous on the basis of SDS-PAGE results. When compared, the guinea pig liver and goat kidney enzymes appear to differ in their properties. For example, rabbit antibody to guinea pig liver B-mannosidase is unreactive towards human and goat 76 fi-mannosidases in immunoinhibition studies, indicating immunological non-identity between guinea pig liver and the goat kidney enzymes (26). Therefore, the present protocol, using FPLC cation and anion exchange and gel filtration chromatographies, to prepare fi-mannosidase is unique and it is the first report of a highly purified lysosomal fi-mannosidase from goat tissue. APPENDIX APPENDIX VI. CONVENTIONAL HYDROPHOBIC CHROMATOGRAPHY Preliminary purification of fi-mannosidase included a number of procedures such as hydrophobic chromatography using octyl- and phenyl-Sepharose. Octyl-Sepharose was not successful. In contrast, phenyl-Sepharose chromatography, incorporated into the purification scheme after the CM- Sephadex step, resulted in a 345-fold purification and an approximate 3% yield of the enzyme (Table 2-2). Lysosomal fi-mannosidase was eluted from the phenyl- Sepharose resin in buffer containing 40% ethylene glycol (Figure 2-5). Enzymatic activity corresponded to two protein peaks which were pooled separately. An SDS- polyacrylamide gel electrophoretic analysis of the major phenyl-Sepharose pool (pool A, fractions 39-42) showed 15 bands. The most intensely Coomassie blue stained band was at approximately 67 Rd. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that lysosomal fl-mannosidase is a homodimer since the native molecular weight of the enzyme from liver is estimated at 127 i 10 Rd (16). The phenyl-Sepharose chromatographic step was associated with a loss of p- mannosidase activity (74%) and a corresponding decrease in 77 78 total protein (81%). It is likely that the considerable time it took to elute the enzyme (”8 h) contributed to the substantial loss of activity. FPLC, using phenyl- Sepharose, was, therefore, discussed as a viable option because of the short separation time (“20-30 min). The incorporation of FPLC phenyl-Sepharose, following the FPLC Mono Q step, resulted in purification of fi-mannosidase 47,000-fold, to a specific activity of 341,800, and with a 7% yield (27). 79 . a8 8.: 5.3.3:... .3888 m5 5.? 88829. mm3.>ua>auu¢ .olm musmam oa ucwmoa on» mom mooauflucoo oasnmumoumsouno omoumcnwmnaxcuzn on» no cowunwuummo a you w 2 89: men 2.. nnom $5 5&6 88588.85 ésag «mm d 82 a...“ 86.8 8885 83:5 mm 3 mm... 5.9” «3.8 8885 87o 8888 mm 3. m3 662 onm.mm 8885 388$ :8 Eu: 3 x obfl 84 8 Tom «ma... 6863 535$ £8: £8. 2 x m 8.3 o4 8H 5.: 36.» 31.3 839888 688.55 E .597. A». .8 Emma: a! $53 555E..— E E .8 E E E 80 FIGURE 2-5. PHENYL-SEPHAROSE CHROMATOGRAPHY OF H- HANNOSIDASE. Lysosomal B-mannosidase (purified to a specific activity of 3,706 units/mg protein) was mixed, at 25°C, with 20 ml of phenyl-Sepharose pre-equili- brated in buffer 1 (0.01 M sodium citrate/1.0 M NaCl/0.8 M (NH4)2804/0.02% NaN3/10% (v/v) glycerol, pH 5.5). After 1 h, the column was poured, at 4°C, and washed sequentially with buffer 1, buffer 2 (0.01 M sodium citrate/0.6 M NaCl/0.02% NaN3/1O% (v/v) glycerol, pH 6.5) and then buffer 3 (0.01 M sodium citrate/0.05 M NaCl/0.02% NaN3/10% (v/v) glycerol, pH 6.5). fi-Mannosidase activity was finally eluted with buffer 4 (buffer 3 containing 40% ethylene glycol). The fractions containing 3- mannosidase activity were pooled into two separate samples; pool A (fractions 39-42) and pool B (fractions 43-47). 81 a: a: N1— fi-Mannosi ase Actnntv 5:6: 5:96 come-co [Total Units) (H) a O IN Baa—.2 .523: fie m...“ Pm Me fie mm a.” mu cw mp c— m (Va—u —D 5.: u: G. c: (-----l (082v) Mama 9 F C O 3.: LIST OF REFERENCES 10. 11. 12. VI. LIST OF REFERENCES Jones, M.Z. & Dawson, G. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256, 5185-5188. Healy, P.J., Seaman, J.T., Gardner, I.A. and Sewell, C.A. (1981) Aust. Vet. J. fil, 504-507. Jones, M.Z., Rathke, E.J.S., Cavanagh, K. and Hancock, L.W. (1984) J. Inher. Metab. Dis. 1, 80-85. Pearce, R.D., Callahan, J.W., Little, P.B., Armstrong, D.R., Clarke, J.T.R. (1987) Biochem. J. 253, 603-609. Wenger, D.A., Sujansky, E., Fennessey, P Thompson, J.N. (1986) N. Engl. J. Med. 3 1201-1205. .V. and .15. Cooper, A., Sardharwalla, I.B. and Roberts, M.M. (1986) N. Engl. J. Med. 315, 1231. Jones, M.Z. and Laine, R.A. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256, 5181-5184. Jones, M.Z., Cunningham, J.G., Dade, A.W., Alessi, D.M., Mostosky, U.V., Vorro, J.R., Benitez, J.T. and Lovell, K.L. (1983) J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 32, 268-285. Matsuura, F., Laine, R.A. and Jones, M.Z. (1981) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 211, 485-493. Matsuura, P., Jones, M.Z. and Frazier, S.E. (1983) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 752, 67-73. Lovell, K.L. and Jones, M.Z. (1985) Acta Neuropathol. §§, 293-299. Matsuura, F and Jones, M.Z. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. zgg, 15239-15245. ' 82 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 83 LaBadie, J.H. and Aronson, N.N. (1973) Biochim. Biophys. Acta. ggl, 603-614. Dawson, G. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 3369-3371. Noeske, C. and Mersmann, G. (1983) Hoppe- Seyler's z. Physiol. Chem. 364, 1645-1651. Cavanagh, K.T., Fisher, R.A., Legler, G., Herrchen, M., Jones, M.Z., Julich, E., Sewell- Alger, R.P., Sinnott, M.L. and Wilkinson, F.E. (1985) Enzyme g5, 75-82. Bernard, M., Sioud, M., PercherOn, F., and Foglietti, M.J. (1986) Int. J.Biochem. lg, 1065— 1068. Frei, J.I., Cavanagh, K., Chio, C., DuPuis, M., Fisher, R.A., Hausinger, R., Jones, M.Z., Rathke, E.J.S. and Truscott, N. (1987) Fed. Proc. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 56, 2149. Frei, J.I., Cavanagh, K.T., Fisher, R.A., Hausinger, R.A., DuPuis, M., Rathke, E.J.S. and Jones, M.Z. (1988) Biochem. J. 249, 871-875. Kyosaka, S., Murata, S., Nakamura, F. and Tanaka, M. (1985) Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1;, 256- 263. - ' Bradford, M.M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 1;, 248- 254. O'Farrell, P.H. (1975) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 4007- 4021. Suelter, C. H. (1985) A Practical Guide to Enzymology, pp. 160, John Wiley and Sons, New York. Chester, M.A. and Ockerman, P.-A. (1981) in Proc. 6th Int. Sympos. on Glycoconjugates (Yamakawa, T., Osawa, T. and Honda, S., eds) pp. 208, Japan Sci. Soc. Press, Tokyo. Reese, E.T. (1977) Recent Adv. Phytochem. 1;, 311-367. 84 McCabe, N.R., Horowitz, A.L., Tanaka, M., Jones, M.Z. and Dawson, G. (1987) J. Neurochem. Ag (Suppl.), 35 C. 27. Cavanagh, K.T., Chio, C., DuPuis, M., Fisher, R.A., Frei, J.I., Hausinger, R., Jones, M.Z., Rathke, E.J.S. and Truscott, N. (1987) in Proc. IX Int. Sympos. on Glycoconjugates. 26. ABSTRACT PURIFICATION AND PARTIAL CHARACTERIZATION OF PERIPHERAL NERVE AND THYROID OLIGOSACCHARIDES CHAPTER 3 fi-Mannosidosis goats are characterized by the tissue accumulation of oligosaccharides including the disaccharide Manfil-4GlcNAc (DS), the trisaccharide ManBl-4GlcNAcfil- 4GlcNAc (TS), the tetrasaccharides Manfil-4GlcNAcBl-4Manfil- 4GlcNAc (C1) and Manal-6Manfil-4GlcNAcfi1-4GlcNAc (C2) and the pentasaccharide Manfi1-4GlcNAcB1-4Manfil-4GlcNAcfi1- 4GlcNAc (C). In this study, peripheral nerve and thyroid oligosaccharides were isolated from fi-mannosidosis goat tissues and purified by Bio Gel P-4 and Bio Gel P—2 chromatographies, respectively. DS and T8 were identified, in peripheral nerve, on the basis of mobility on TLC and GC-MS of the permethylated intact oligosaccharide alcohol derivatives. Five oligosaccharides were purified from the thyroid and analysed by TLC. Each oligosaccharide was subjected to structural characterization studies which included sugar composition analyses and direct inlet-MS of the reduced and permethylated intact alditol derivatives. DS, TS, C and a 85 86 C1/C2 mixture were identified. The fifth compound migrated in the tetra- to penta- saccharide region on thin—layer chromatograms and sugar composition analyses produced a one:one ratio of mannitol to N-acetylglucosaminitol. The direct inlet-mass spectrum, of the reduced and permethylated alditol, had ions representing a methylated hexose unit and a N-acetylhexos- aminitolon at the non-reducing and reducing ends, respectively. These data are considered evidence for the accumulation of a possible novel oligosaccharide in the thyroid of a fi-mannosidosis goat. 87 I. INTRODUCTION Complex carbohydrates are a diverse group of biopolymers composed of one or more oligosaccharide chains covalently linked to polypeptides (glycoproteins) or lipids (glycolipids). Glycoproteins include immunoglobulins, all lysosomal enzymes, some hormones, toxins, carrier and membrane proteins (1-4). In fact, nearly all secretory, extracellular matrix and cell surface proteins are glycosylated (3,5). It has been postulated that the carbohydrates of some glycoproteins are involved in non- primary functions. In this category are non-specific interactions with other carbohydrates, macromolecular stabilization of protein conformation and protection from proteolysis (1-4). Although the removal of carbohydrate rarely affects the biological activities of proteins as catalysts (1,3,4), there is growing evidence that the carbohydrate portion of glycoconjugates perform other important and specific biological functions. These include signaling of various cellular recognition phenomena, including the Man-6-P-dependent transport of lysosomal enzymes to lysosomes, regulation of the immune response, specification of blood groups and regulation of 88 differentiation and growth of organisms (1-11). The carbohydrate chains of glycoproteins are classified according to the linkage between sugar and amino acid (1,2,4). The most common type in mammalian glycoproteins is an N-glycosidic linkage between an Asn residue in the polypeptide and a GlcNAc residue in the oligosaccharide (Figure 3-1, A). Such N- or Asn-linked oligosaccharides occur in many proteins. Included are lysosomal enzymes, immunoglobulins, hormones, membrane and transport proteins and receptors for viruses, toxins and other biomolecules. Other linkages, of the 0-glycosidic type, also occur in mammalian glycoproteins (Figure 3-1, B). 0-Linked oligosaccharides, with a GalNAc residue linked to either a Ser or Thr residue in the polypeptide, have been detected primarily in mucins lining the epithelia of the respiratory, genitourinary and gastrointestinal systems (1,2,4). Mucins are generally rich in sialic acid or sulfated sugars and form viscoelastic gels which protect the mucous epithelia from bacterial invasion and proteolytic degradation. The removal of sialic acid results in decreased viscosity of mucin (4). Oligosaccharides that are 0- or N-linked also occur together in immunoglobulins, glycophorin and other molecules (2,4). All N-linked oligosaccharides share a common core containing 3 Man and 2 GlcNAc residues (Figure 3-2, A). 89 FIGURE 3-1. THE TWO MAJOR CARBOHYDRATE PEPTIDE LINKAGES IN VARIOUS GLMCOPROTEINS. A. Asparagine- or N-linked sugar chain. B. Mucin- or 0-linked sugar chain. 90 A_ O O H II ‘sz NH H0 I H— c — COOH | AC NH2 R = HorCH3 ’ NH l HOV I _. H— (I: — COOH AC NH2 91 This core is common to high Man-, complex- and hybrid- types. In addition, the hybrid and bisected complex oligosaccharides have a bisecting GlcNAc 31-4 linked to the B-Man of the inner core (Figure 3-2, B). The following discussion will be limited to N-linked oligosaccharides. II. STRUCTURAL CHARACTERIZATION OF N-LINKED OLIGO- SACCHARIDES A. OVERVIEW The determination of the primary structure of a purified oligosaccharide is based on several charac- teristics including the glycosyl residue composition and the linkage, anomeric configuration and sequence of the glycosyl residues (4,23). Methods have been described to determine accurately all of these characteristics on less than 100 ug of purified sample (4,23-55). Using one micro-procedure, however, subnanomole quantities (50-500 pmole) of N- linked glycoprotein oligosaccharides can be analyzed by GC-MS (40). The technology used to chemically characterize completely the structures of oligosac- charides is relatively recent and usually includes using a combination of techniques involving GC, GC- MS, HPLC, HPLC-MS, selective glycosidase digestions, direct inlet-MS or FAB-MS and 1H- or 13c-NMR. B. FRACTIONATION Oligosaccharide mixtures can be fractionated by paper electrophoresis (12) or by ion exchange (13), 92 FIGURE 3-2. THE STRUCTURE OF THE CORE COMMON TO ASPARAGINE-LINKED OLIGOSACCHARIDES. Structure A is common to high Man, hybrid and complex oligosaccharides. Hybrid- and bisected complex-types have a bisecting GlcNAc fil-4 linked to the fi-Man of the inner core as shown in B. 93 A. Manw_6 Man[31 —4GlcNAcB1 —4GlcNAc—Asn Man a1_6 GIcNAcJ’Jf—Manm -4 GlcNAcB1 —4GIcNAc—Asn 94 paper (14), gel filtration (Bio-Gel P-2 or P-4) (15),lectin-Sepharose (16), preparative thin-layer (17,18) or high performance liquid chromatographies (15,19-22). C. CARBOHYDRATE COMPOSITION GC of carbohydrates, after total acid hydrolysis and derivatization, allows determination of the monosaccharides comprising an oligo- or poly- saccharide. GC can also be used to analyze oligosaccharides after selective or partial hydrolysis, followed by derivatization, to give information about the original structure. Carbo— hydrates are generally nonvolatile because of highly polar hydroxyl groups which must be converted to volatile derivatives such as ethers (e.g., silyl, methyl, ethyl) and esters (e.g., acetyl, trifluro- acetyl) before GC (23-26,28-38,40,42,45-49,52,55). Sweeley gt a; , for example, reported excellent separation of various trimethylsilyl derivatives of sugars by GC (26). The alditol acetate derivatiz- ation procedure is also a popular method for determination of sugar composition by GC (24,46). Alditol acetates are prepared by acid hydrolysis of the oligosaccharide, conversion of the monosaccharide products to their alditols by sodium borohydride reduction and then peracetylation of the resulting 95 alditols. Carbohydrate composition can also be determined by reducing the C-1 position of monosacc- harides with NaB[3H]4 and then separating the products using a radioelectrophoretic method (4,24). By using this method, the reducing termini of oligosaccharides are also ascertained. D. GLYCOSIDASE DIGESTIONS Sequential exo- and endo-glycosidase digestions of oligosaccharides are used to determine the sequence, as well as the anomeric configuration, of each sugar residue in the structure (4,39,43,44). Exoglycosidases hydrolytically cleave monosaccharide residues from the non-reducing terminus and are very specific for the sugar to be released and its anomerity. For example, B-mannosidase can hydrolyze only terminal fi-mannosyl residues at the non- reducing end of oligosaccharides. Exoglycosidases also have specificities for the structure of the sugar chain in the region where the monosaccharide is to be cleaved. Jack bean a-mannosidase, for example, cleaves Mana1-2Man and Mana1-6Man linkages faster than the Mana1-3Man linkage (4,56). Similarly, a- mannosidase, purified from an Aspergillus species, can cleave the Manal-ZMan linkage but not Mana1-3Man or Mana1-6Man linkages (57). Endoglycosidases split the chitobiose linkage between the two GLcNAc 96 residues within the core region of N-linked oligo- saccharides. Enzymes that_have been used for sequential digestions include neuraminidase, B- galactosidase, a-fucosidase, fi-N-acetylhexos- aminidase, a-mannosidase, B-mannosidase, endo-fi-N- acetylglucosaminidase and peptidezN-glycosidase F. These enzymes have been purified from a variety of bacterial, plant, vertebrate and non-vertebrate sources (4,39,44,56-67). The products of enzymatic digestions are identified by use of thin-layer, gel filtration, paper or gas chromatographies. Labeling the reducing termini of oligosaccharides with tritium, prior to exoglycosidase digestions, aids in detecting the reducing ends as well as the sequential digestion products (4). Alternatively, preparing uv-absorbing derivatives of oligosaccharides, using the reductive amination procedure, allows detection and separation of the derivatives and their enzymatic digestion products by HPLC (39). E. METHYLATION ANALYSIS Methylation analysis is a widely used method for determining the position of the glycosidic linkages in oligosaccharides (32,33,40,49). A convenient method for methylation of carbohydrates, giving high yields of the permethylated derivatives, has been 97 developed by Hakomori (32). Complete methylation of accessible functional groups, such as all free hydroxyls and N-acetamido groups, is accomplished in one step. GC and GC-MS analyses of the intact permethylated derivatives are very useful for deter- mination of the molecular weights of the monosacc- haride units, the sequence of monosaccharides, if they have different masses, and for the assignment of the position of the glycosidic linkages (36-38). Peralkylated intact oligosaccharide alditols have been analyzed by BPLC-MS (23). Subsequent acid-hydrolysis of the permethylated oligosaccharides, followed by acetylation of the reduced alditols, yields the partially methylated alditol acetates. Separation of these derivatives by GC, using a Gas Chrom Q column coated with ECNSS-M, 0V-225, 08-138 or 0V-17 and mass spectrometric analyses of the eluted components allows determin- ation of the carbohydrate composition and position of the glycosidic linkages in the original oligo- or poly-saccharide (28,29,49). Partially ethylated alditol acetates are also analyzed using GC and GC-MS (23). F. MASS SPECTROMETRY AND NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANALYSES Conclusive information on the number of sugar residues, sugar sequence, branching of the 98 carbohydrate chain, molecular weight, and position of the linkages can be obtained by subjecting the intact oligosaccharide derivatives to direct probe-MS in either the electron impact or chemical ionization mode (50). FAB-MS is useful in this regard because it is a relatively simple technique and can be applied to either native or derivatized oligosacc- harides (51). 1H-NMR or 13C-NMR analyses of intact oligosaccharides also provides information on the anomerity of the linkages as well as the sequence of sugars and their linkage positions (53,54). In principle, it might eventually be possible to determine the complete structure of a complex oligosaccharide by NMR. So far this goal has not been achieved, however, it is likely that when a large dictionary of NMR and FAB-MS spectra of oligosaccharides is cbmpiled, other characterization methods, more time consuming and difficult to perform, will become obsolete. Currently, FAB-MS and NMR analyses fit conveniently into pre-existing analytical schemes and complement traditional chemical and enzymological approaches to structure elucidation. All of these powerful methods combined have led to the chemical characterization of many Asn-linked oligosaccharides (1,2,4). 99 III. THE STRUCTURES OF ACCUMULATED N-LINKED OLIGO- SACCHARIDES IN THE GLNCOPROTEINOSES. In many lysosomal storage diseases, specifically the glycoproteinoses, oligosaccharides accumulate in tissues and are excreted in the urine due to the deficient activity of a specific exoglycosidase (Table 1-2) (68-70). The exoglycosidases, functioning in the catabolism of the carbohydrate portion of N-linked glycoproteins, hydrolyze monosaccharide residues from the non-reducing termini of the oligosaccharide chains (Figure 1-5). Consequently, the oligosaccharides stored in each disease usually contain the monosaccharide at the non-reducing terminus which should have been cleaved by the deficient exoglycosidase. Oligo- saccharides rather than glycopeptides accumulate because the enzyme asparaginyl-N-acetylglucosamine amidohydrolase cleaves the glycosasparagine linkage (Figure 1-5). Inher- ited deficiences have been described for all of these exoglycosidases in humans and animals and the resulting accumulated oligosaccharides, detected in tissues and/or urine, have been characterized (68-111). In a-manno- sidosis, for example, up to 17 high Man oligosaccharides have been purified from human urine and characterized (103,104). These characterization studies provide useful information about the structures of Asn—linked oligosacc- harides of glycoproteins as well as about processing and degradation events which are related to species- and/or organ-specific differences. 100 Caprine fl-mannosidosis is characterized by the accumulation in brain (105), kidney (108,109), allantoic fluid (110), urine (111) and skin fibroblasts (74,77) of primarily the disaccharide, Manfil-4GlcNAc and the tri- saccharide, Manfll-4GlcNAcfil-4GlcNAc, due to a deficiency in the activity of lysosomal B-mannosidase (71,77). Oligo- saccharide storage in the CNS is associated with widespread dysmyelinogenesis and axonal dystrophy (72,112-116). In contrast, the myelin in the PNS of fi-mannosidosis goats is generally interpretated as normal. Recently, higher molecular weight oligosaccharides, accumulating to a lower concentration in the kidney of affected goats, have been purified and characterized (109). They are the tetra- saccharides, Manfil-4GlcNAcfil-4Manfi1-4GlcNAc (C1) and Manal- 6Manfil-4GlcNAcfil-4GlcNAc (C2) and the pentasaccharide, Manfi1-4GlcNACBl-4Manfi1-4G1CNACfil-4GlcNAo (PS). The oligosaccharides C1 and PS have not been previously identified in any organism. 101 IV. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM Oligosaccharides were purified, from the peripheral nerve and thyroid of fi-mannosidosis goats, and partially characterized to identify the accumulation of tissue- specific and/or other higher molecular weight oligosacc- harides. It was hypothesized that the differences in myelination between the CNS and PNS are associated with quantitative and/or qualitative differences in the stored oligosaccharides. In order to test this hypothesis, oligosaccharides from peripheral nerve had to be purified and characterized. Preliminary results were presented (106,107). V. 102 MATERIALS AND METHODS A. MATERIALS 1. Tissues Samples of peripheral nerve and thyroid were obtained from affected and normal goats main- tained at the Michigan State University Nubian goat fi-mannosidosis breeding colony. The tissues were removed from euthanized animals and stored either at -20°C or -80‘C until use. 2. Chromatography Supplies, Chemicals and Solvents Bio-Gel P-2 (200-400 mesh), P-4 (-400 mesh), AG3-X4A (200-400 mesh) andDowex 50W-X8 were from Bio-Rad Labs., Richmond, CA. Whatman LHP-K TLC plates (10 X 10 cm), coated with 200 pm of silica gel G, were purchased from Fisher Scientific Co., Fairlawn, N.J. TLC plates (Uniplates, 20 X 20 cm), coated with 250 pm of silica gel G, were obtained from Analtech Inc., Newark, DE. High performance TLC plates (10 X 10 cm), coated with 0.25 mm of silica gel 60, were from E. Merck, Cincinnati, Ohio. GC columns (2 mm X 1.8 m), packed with 2% 0V-17 on Gas Chrom Q (100-120 mesh), 3% 0V-210 on Gas Chrom Q (80-100 mesh) or 3% 0V-225 on Gas Chrom Q (80-100 mesh), were purchased from Supelco, 103 Bellefonte, PA. Dexil-300 (1%), on Gas Chrom Q (60-80 mesh), was also from Supelco. Glc, Gal, Man, GlcNAc, GalNAc, NaN3, NaBH4 and NaB[2H]4 were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo. Glucose oligomers were prepared by partial acid hydrolysis of dextran (117). Unisil (200-325 mesh) was from Clarkson Chemical Company, Inc., Williamsport, PA. Glacial acetic acid (gold label), H2804 (gold label), CHC13 (HPLC grade) and MeOH (HPLC grade) were purchased from Aldrich Chemical Co., Inc. Milwaukee, WI. All other chemicals and organic solvents were reagent grade or better. B. METHODS 1. Gel Permeation Chromatography Bio Gel P-4 column chromatography was performed on a column (1.5 X 109 cm) of -400 mesh beads. Repeated Bio-Gel P-2 column chromatography was performed on columns (1.0 X 101 cm or 1.5 X 149 cm) of 200-400 mesh beads. All columns were run at ambient temperature and with distilled water containing 0.02% NaN3. 2. Thin-Layer Chromatography Peripheral nerve oligosaccharides, purified by Bio-Gel P-4 chromatography, were analyzed using Whatman LHP-K TLC plates developed once in 104 acetonitrile:water (4:1, v/v) (solvent 1) (105,108). The oligosaccharides were also applied to Analtech silica gel G Uniplates and developed once in n-butanolzacetic acid:water (3:3:2, v/v/v) (solvent 2) (104,108). Thyroid oligosaccharides, purified by repeated Bio-Gel P-2 chromatography, were analyzed using either Analtech Uniplates or Whatman LHP-K plates developed once in solvent 2. After development, the hexoses were visualized by spraying the plates with 5% orcinol-HZSO4 and heating at 100°C for approximately 10 min. TLC of the permethylated peripheral nerve oligosaccharide alcohols was performed on Merck silica gel 60 thin-layer plates which were developed twice in benzene:methanol (5:1, v/v) with drying between developments (108,118).. Permethylated thyroid oligosaccharide alcohols were analyzed on Whatman LHP-K TLC plates which were developed twice in benzene:methanol (4:1, v/v) with drying between developments (108,118). After develop- ment, the permethylated compounds were visualized using orcinol-sto4 spray and heating as described above. 3. Analytical Methods Hexose content of the saccharide fractions 105 and/or pools was determined by the phenol-H2S04 assay (119). Assays were conducted in tripli- cate and in thick-walled, glass pyrex test tubes. A linear standard curve for glucose was constructed. The standards contained 1.0 ml of each glucose solution, 1.0 ml of 5% phenol and 5.0 ml of concentrated H2S04. Immediately after the addition of acid, each sample was rapidly vortexed, cooled to room temperature and the absorbance read at 490 nm. The blanks contained 1.0 ml water, 1.0 ml 5% phenol and 5.0 ml H2804. The unknowns contained 0.05-0.15 ml sample, 0.85-0.95 ml water, 1.0 ml 5% phenol and 5.0 ml concentrated H2804. The hexose content of the experimental samples was then determined by reference to the standard curve. 4. Isolation and Purification of Oligosaccharides a. Peripheral Nerve Oligosaccharides One gram of frozen brachial plexus from an affected 4-week-old female kid and an age- and sex-matched control were each minced on dry ice and then sonicated (1 min, setting 3) (Sonicator Cell Disrupter Model W 185 F Heat Systems, Ultrasonics Inc.) in 2.0 ml of distilled water. The suspension was centrifuged (12,000 g x 10 min) and the 106 supernatant was saved. The pellet was then resonicated (1 min, setting 3) in 1.0 ml of water and centrifuged as described above. The supernatants were combined, frozen at -80'C and then lyophilized overnight. The residue was dissolved in 1.0 ml of water and applied to a Bio-Gel P-4 column. Fractions of 50 drops were collected. The column fractions were monitored for hexose by TLC in either solvent 1 or 2. The fractions were pooled into two samples, on the basis of TLC mobility, and designated as the disaccharide and trisaccharide samples, respectively. The hexose content in 100 uL aliquots was estimated by the phenol-H2804 method. The two pooled samples were lyophilized and subjected to structural characterization. b. Thyroid Oligosaccharides Oligosaccharides, from 20 g of thyroid tissue, were extracted with distilled water, deproteinized with glacial acetic acid and then partially purified, by repeated Bio-Gel P-2 and/or P-4 chromatographies, according to previously described methods (108,111). Column fractions were monitored for hexose 107 by TLC (Analtech Uniplates) in solvent 2 and similar fractions from different columns were pooled. Three pooled samples were obtained and analyzed using TLC (Analtech Uniplates) after development in solvent 2. Orcinol-positive spots in the disaccharide (sample I), trisaccharide (sample II) and tri- to hexa-saccharide (sample III) regions of the thin-layer Chromatogram were identified. Sample III was lyophilized overnight and resuspended in 2.0 ml of distilled water. Aliquots of 0.5 ml were applied to Bio-Gel P-2 columns and fractions of 35 drops were collected. The columns were monitored by TLC (Analtech Uniplates) in solvent 2. Similar fractions were pooled, concentrated to a small volume by lyophilization and then further purified by repeated (2-7 times) Bio-Gel P-2 chroma- tography. Elution fractions (35 drops/tube) were analyzed by TLC (Whatman LHP-K plates) in solvent 2 and the appropriate fractions were pooled and lyophilized. Five purified fractions (disaccharide, trisaccharide, A, B and C) were obtained and partially characterized. 108 5. Sugar Composition AnalySes The purified thyroid oligosaccharides were hydrolyzed, reduced and acetylated according to the method of Endo gt a; (120) except that the oligosaccharides (“300-400 pg) were hydrolyzed in sealed test tubes, with 0.3 ml of 90% acetic acid containing 0.5 N H2804, for 4 hrs at 80’C (121). Small columns (0.5 X 5 cm) of Bio-Rad AG3 anion-exchange resin (acetate form) were used to absorb the sulfate from the hydro- lyzates. The hydrolyzed sugars were each eluted with water and then reduced overnight with NaBH4 (8 mg/ml). The reactions were stopped by the dropwise addition of glacial acetic acid until hydrogen gas no longer evolved from the solutions. The acidified solutions were then taken to dryness under-a stream of nitrogen, at 50-60’C, after the successive additions of MeOH (total volume ~25 ml). In this manner, borate was removed as the volatile trimethylborate ester. The residues were dried overnight, under vacuum, in a dessicator containing phosphorus pentoxide. The samples were acetylated with 0.5 ml of acetic anhydride for 4 h at 100'C. After drying under nitrogen, with the aid of suc- cessive additions of toluene (total volume 20-30 109 ml), the samples were dissolved in 3.0 ml of CHCl3, washed three times with distilled water (3 ml) and then dehydrated by passage over anhydrous NaZSO4. The resulting alditol acetates were separated and quantified using GC. Identification was made by comparing retention times with those of reference standards (glucitol acetate, galactitol acetate, mannitol acetate, N-acetylglucosaminitol acetate and N- acetylgalactosaminitol acetate) reduced to their alditols according to the procedure described above. 6. Preparation of the Methylsulfonyl Carbanion The methylsulfonyl carbanion was prepared according to the procedure of Hakomori (32). A sample of sodium hydride (0.64 g of an 80% oil emulsion), in a round bottom flask, was washed 5-7 times with petroleum ether (total volume ~100 ml) and then dried under nitrogen gas. Dry, redistilled DMSO (10 ml) was added and the flask was lowered into a water bath/sonicator maintained at 50-60’C. The reaction was allowed to proceed for 60-90 min or until the bubbling of hydrogen ceaSed. The carbanion was trans- ferred in 1.ml aliquots to screw cap test tubes which were then flushed with nitrogen and stored 110 at 4'C. 7. Methylation studies Purified peripheral nerve oligosaccharides (“300- 400 ug) were reduced, at ambient temperature for 2 h, with 0.5 m1 of NaBH4 (8 mg/ml 0.01 N NaOH). Purified thyroid oligo- saccharides (“300-400 ug) were reduced at ambient temperature overnight, with 0.5 m1 of NaB[2Hj4 (20 mg/ml H20). The solutions were acidified and borate removed as described above. Acetate was removed from each sample by passage over small columns (0.5 X 5.0 cm) of Bio-Rad Dowex-SO (H+). The resulting oligosaccharide alcohols were lyophilized overnight, dried 24-48 h under vacuum in a dessicator containing phosphorus pentoxide, and then permethylated by use of the Hakomori method (32) as modified by Stellner gt g; (122).. The dried samples were solubilized under nitrogen, in 0.3 ml of DMSO, with the aid of a small stir bar and by im- mersion in a sonicator/water bath for 30-40 min. Then, 0.3 ml of the methylsulfonyl carbanion, brought to room temperature, was added and the tubes were flushed with nitrogen. After stirring for 2 hrs, 0.3 ml of methyl iodide was added dropwise to the sample tubes which were 111 immersed in an ice bath. The reaction mixtures were stirred at room temperature for 3 hrs and then mixed with 5.0 ml of CHCl3 and washed 5 times with distilled water, once with 5.0 ml of sodium thiosulfate (20% solution) and 5 more times with distilled water. The organic phases were evaporated to dryness under nitrogen and resuspended in 1.0 ml of CHCl3. For further purification, the methylated oligosaccharides were each applied to a column (0.5 X 5.0 cm) of Unisil silicic acid equilibrated in CHC13. The columns were washed with 10 ml of CHC13 and then the methylated samples were eluted with 6 ml of CHCl3:MeOH (4:1, v/v). The completeness of permethylation was assessed by TLC. The per- methylated intact peripheral nerve and thyroid oligosaccharide alcohols were each analyzed directly by use of GC-MS and direct probe-MS, respectively. Aliquots of the purified, per- methylated thyroid oligosaccharide samples were each hydrolyzed, reduced and acetylated according to the procedures described above for the sugar composition analyses. The resulting PMAA's were analyzed by use of GC. Identifi- fication was made by comparison of the retention times with those of known standards 112 (104,108,109). 8. Gas Chromatography GC was performed on a Hewlett-Packard 5840 A gas chromatograph, equipped with flame ionization detectors, using packed glass columns. Permethylated peripheral nerve oligo- saccharide alditols were analyzed on a column (45 cm X 2 mm) of 1% Dexil-300 with temperature programming from 140’-320°C at 5°C/min. Alditol acetates, of each thyroid oligosaccharide frac- tion, were analyzed on a column of 3% OV-225. The column temperature was programmed from 190°- 260°C at 3’C/min. The PMAA's, of each thyroid oligosaccharide fraction, were analyzed on a column containing 2% OV-17. The temperature was programmed from 140°-270’C at 3°C/min. PMAA's of the neutral sugars were analyzed on a column of 3% OV-210 with temperature programming from 150’-270°C at 3°C/min. 9. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry GC-MS, of peripheral nerve oligosaccharide alcohols, was performed on a Hewlett-Packard 5985 gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer. Gas chromatographic conditions were the same as described above. The mass spectra were recorded at 70 eV and the ion source was at 200’C. 113 10. Mass Spectrometry Permethylated thyroid oligosaccharide alditols were analyzed using direct inlet-MS. A Hewlett-Packard 5985 quadrapole mass spectrometer was used and the spectra were recorded at either 40 or 70 eV with the ion source at 200'C. Ion fragments of all mass spectra were assigned according to Kochetkov gt g1 (123,124), Karkkainen (36-38) and by comparison to previously published mass spectra of permethylated oligosaccharide alditols (108,109,111). Symbols A-J indicate the fragmentation pattern, a-d the monosaccharide units from the non-reducing terminus and ald, alditol. 114 VI. RESULTS A. PERIPHERAL NERVE OLIGOSACCHARIDES 1. Isolation of Oligosaccharides The water extract of brachial plexus from a fi-mannosidosis goat, when analyzed by TLC using solvent 1, yielded major orcinol-positive spots in the di- and tri-saccharide regions. Minor spots in the tri- to penta-saccharide regions were also observed supporting earlier observa- tions (M.Z. Jones, personal communication) that higher molecular weight oligosaccharides are present in peripheral nerve extracts from affected goats. No hexoses were detected in an extract of brachial plexus from a control age- and sex-matched goat when analyzed by use of TLC in solvent 1. The extract of peripheral nerve from the affected goat was subjected to Bio-Gel P-4 chromatography. Two oligosaccharides were purified and each gave a single orcinol-positive spot on thin-layer chromatograms developed in solvents 1 and 2 (Figure 3-3). These purified oligosaccharides also co-migrated on TLC with authentic DS and TS previously purified and characterized from fi-mannosidosis goat tissues. The di- and tri-saccharide fractions each contained 0.2 nmol hexose/g of wet tissue, 115 FIGURE 3-3. THIN-LAYER CHROMATOGRAM OF PERIPHERAL NERVE OLIGOSACCHARIDES. The thin-layer plate was developed in n-butanol: acetic acid:water (3:3:2, v/v/v) and the hexoses were visualized with orcinol-H2804 reagent. Lane 1: Glucose oligomers obtained by partial acid hydrolysis of dextran. Lane 2: DS purified by Bio-Gel P-4 chromatography. Lane 3: TS purified by Bio-Gel P-4 chromatography. -v O Coco; TS 117 respectively. 2. Partial Characterization Studies a. Structure of 08 GO of the permethylated intact oligosaccharide alditol from DS resulted in a single peak (Figure 3-4). The other peaks in the chromatogram are unidentified, non- carbohydrate containing compounds. The mass spectrum of DS (Figure 3-5) was assigned as follows: The ions at m/z 219 (aAl), M/z 187 (aAz), m/z 155 (aA3), m/z 88 (H1) and m/z 101 (F1) indicate a methylated hexose unit at the non-reducing end. 'The ions at m/z 276 and m/z 130 indicate the presence of N- acetylhexosaminitol at the reducing end. These ions, in addition to those at m/z 466 (M-45), m/z 424 (M-45-42), m/z 381 (M-l30) and m/z 349 (M-130-32), provide evidence that DS is hexosyl --> N-acetylhexosamin- itol. The ions at m/z 175, m/z 142 and m/z 89, and lack of ions at m/z 133, indicate that the hexose is linked to C-4 of N- acetylhexosaminitol. From these results, it is concluded that DS is Man1-4GlcNAc. b. structure of TS GC of the permethylated intact 118 FIGURE 3-4. GAS CHROMATOGRAM OF THE INTACT PERMETHYLATED OLIGOSACCHARIDE ALCOHOL FROM DISACCHARIDE. Chromatography was accomplished on a column (2 mm X 45 cm) packed with 1% Dexil-300 on Gas Chrom Q (60-80 mesh). The temperature was programmed from 140°-320°C at 5'C/min. 119 ow on 3335:: 0.5... .5355: ON a m0 osuodsaa 10109190 120 FIGURE 3-5. MASS SPECTRUM OF THE INTACT PERMETHYLATED OLIGOSACCHARIDE ALCOHOL FROM DISACCHARIDE AND THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE. The spectrum was recorded at 70 eV on a Hewlett-Packard 5985 gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer. Gas chromatog- raphy was performed on a column (2 mm X 45 cm) packed with 1% Dexil-300 on Gas Chrom Q (60-80 mesh). The temperature was programmed from 140°-320°C at 5°C/min. 121 3:6 .28. own F . _Om.v Dev 0mm ova 0mm Se . means {on .05 Q0 8.. roo. m. 4. 0mm OQN 00w O»: OO 0Q “ , ova pp. . as. means 5. row .2 8 on. 0““ V oz . a . 4 6. 0:0 IO — 0Q FOOP had an 220 _ _ . oos. llllill o o2. m2 022 2.3 -Iwwu.....un " o . owe . «so .6 220.10 .63 122 oligosaccharide alditol from TS resulted ina single peak (Figure 3-6). The other peaks in the chromatogram are non-carbohydrate containing contaminants. The mass spectrum of TS (Figure 3-7) the ions at m/z 219 (aAl), m/z 187 (aAz), m/z 464 (baAl) and m/z 432 (baAz) indicate the presence of a permethylated hexosyl --> N-acetylhexos- aminyl group. The ions at m/z 521 (bcAl), m/z 276(c) and m/z 130 indicate a N-acetyl- hexosaminyl-->N-acetylhexosaminitol sequence. The ion at m/z 626 (M-130) provides further evidence that this per- methylated oligosaccharide alcohol is hexosyl--> N-acetylhexosaminyl --> N- acetylhexosaminitol. The ion at m/z 175 and the absence of an ion at m/z 133 provide evidence that the linkage between N-acetyl- hexosamine and N-acetylhexosaminitol is 1-4. The presence of ions at m/z 129 and m/z 182 indicate that the hexose is linked to N- acetylhexosamine by a 1-4 linkage. These results provide evidence that TS is Manl- 4GlcNACl-4GlcNAc. B. THYROID OLIGOSACCHARIDES 1. Isolation of Oligosaccharides 123 FIGURE 3-6. GAS CHROMATOGRAM OF THE INTACT PERMETHYLATED OLIGOSACCHARIDE ALCOHOL FROM TRISACCHARIDE. Chromatography was accomplished on a column (2 mm X 45 cm) packed with 1% Dexil-300 on Gas Chrom Q (60-80 mesh). The temperature was programmed from 140'-320’C at 5°C/min. 124 cc om $0558.08: cozcouoc ON 0.. asuodsau 10138330 125 FIGURE 3-7. MASS SPECTRUM OF THE INTACT PERMETHYLATED OLIGOSACCHARIDE ALCOHOL FROM TRISACCHARIDE AND THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE. GC-MS conditions were previously described (legend to Figure 3-5). 126 :6: .35. 03 00..» DVD 00¢ 03 - b d D h n n n b n b b h b P P n W _ can 5... . on mean. 3v .2 5.. .8. O: 000 0V0 8N OQN fl—PILAuI-IALILJ . q . 4— . .. . _ - , mean- «9. . tom .25.. T I. o: co— m. 4. OQN 2a .. oaoazo “ 3 an“ 6. 8 3MB... . ..... . ulll .o .30 o 0.: 0.: 0ND Oh? IOU:— _ 0’0 14.44.52 - u o . . o . wfilllll . «so .6 u .30 :o 23.5 . v3 .2“ 127 Oligosaccharides, extracted from the thyroid of a fi-mannosidosis goat, were partially purified by repeated Bio-Gel P-2 chromatography. Three fractions, designated I, II and III, were iden- tified according to behavior on Bio-Gel P-2 chromatography and TLC using solvent 2. Frac- tions I and II each gave a single orcinol- positive spot in the di- and tri-saccharide regions of the thin-layer chromatograms, respec- tively. TLC of fraction III produced orcinol- positive spots in the tri- to hexa-saccharide regions of the chromatogram (Figure 3-8). A water extract of control goat thyroid did not have any of these saccharides as assessed by TLC in solvent 2. In order to further purify the oligosaccharides, fraction III was subjected to repeated Bio-Gel P-2 chromatography. Each oligo- saccharide fraction obtained (TS, A, B and C) gave a single orcinol-positive spot on thin- layer chromatograms developed in solvent 2 (Figure 3-9). The yields of DS and TS were 3.0 and 15.6 umole hexose/g of wet tissue, respec- tively. 2. Partial Characterization Studies a. Structure of DS The mobility on TLC (Figure 3-9), sugar 128 FIGURE 3-8. THIN-LAYER CHROMATOGRAM OF PARTIALLY PURIFIED THYROID OLIGOSACCHARIDES. The thin-layer plate was developed in n-butanol:acetic acid:water (3:2:2, v/v/v) and the sugars were visualized with orcinol-HZSO4 reagent. Lane 1: Glucose oligomer obtained by partial acid hydrolysis of dextran. Lane 2: Standard Man. Lane 3: Thyroid Oligosaccharide III (1 pl). Lane 4: Thyroid Oligosaccharide III (2 pl). Lane 5: Thyroid Oligosaccharide III (5 pl). FIGURE 3-9. 130 THIN-LAYER CHROMATOGRAM OF PURIFIED THYROID OLIGOSACCHARIDES. The chromatogram was developed and the hexoses visualized as described (legend to Figure 3-8). Lane Lane Lane Lane Lane Lane Lane 1: Glucose oligomers obtained by partial acid hydrolysis of dextran. Saccharide standards: Man and DS and TS purified Purified Purified Purified Purified Purified from fi-mannosidosis goat kidney. thyroid DS. thyroid TS. thyroid oligosaccharide A. thyroid oligosaccharide B. thyroid oligosaccharide C. .OGCOC 8 SDS TS A B 0 132 composition analyses and mass spectrum of the permethylated alditol, provided evidence that DS is MAN1-4GlcNAc. The mass spectrum (not shown) was identical to the mass spectra of DS from peripheral nerve (Figure 3-5) and kidney (108,109) of affected goats. Sugar composition analyses yielded a one:one mannitol to N-acetylglucosaminitol ratio. Data obtained from the gas chromatographic analyses of all the PMAA's from DS, TS, A, B and C were not interpretable. b. Structure of TS T8 was determined to be Man1-4GlcNAc1- 4GlcNAc on the basis of TLC mobility (Figures 3-8 and 3-9), sugar composition analyses and MS of the permethylated alditol. The mass spectrum (not shown) was identical to the mass spectra of TS from both peripheral nerve (Figure 3-7) and kidney (108,109) of affected goats. Sugar composition analyses gave mannitol and N- acetylglucosaminitol in a ratio of one:two. c. Structure of Oligosaccharide A This oligosaccharide co-chromatographed, on TLC in solvent 2, with oligosaccharides 133 C1 and C2 previously isolated and charac- terized from the kidney of a B-mannosidosis goat (109). C1 and C2 are incompletely separated from each other on Bio-Gel P-2 and thin-layer chromatographies. Their structures are Manfil-4GlcNAcfil-4Manfil- 4GlcNAc (C1) and Mana1-6Manfil-4G1cNAcfil- 4GlcNAc (C2). Sugar composition analyses, indicated a one:one ratio of mannitol to N- acetylglucosaminitol. The direct inlet-mass spectrum had all ions corresponding to Cl as the reduced and permethylated oligosacc- saccharide alcohol (109). Several fragmen- tation ions were characteristic of C2 and one ion represented a small amount of Fuc, possibly due to contamination. d. Structure of Oligosaccharide B Oligosaccharide B was detected, on TLC in solvent 2, in the tetra- to penta- saccharide region between oligosaccharides A and C (Figure 3-9). Sugar composition analyses gave a one:one ratio of mannitol to N-acetylglucosaminitol. The direct inlet- mass spectrum, of the NaB[2H]4 reduced and permethylated alditol derivative, had ions representing a methylated hexose unit and a 134 N-acetylhexosaminitolon at the non-reducing and reducing ends, respectively. e. Structure of Oligosaccharide C Sugar composition analyses resulted in a two:three ratio of mannitol to N-acetyl- glucosaminitol. The mass spectrum of C, as the NaB[2H]4 reduced and permethylated alcohol, and the proposed structure are shown (Figure 3-10). The presence of ions at m/z 219 (aAl), m/z 187 (aAz), m/z 155 (aA3), m/z 464 (baAl), m/z 432 (baAZ), m/z 668 (cabAl), m/z 636 (cabAz) and m/z 913 (dabcAl) suggest a hexose-N-acetylhexos- amine-hexose-N-acetylhexosamine-->sequence. In addition, the presence of ions at m/z 277 (ald), m/z 522 (dald), m/z 726 (cdald) and m/z 971 (bcdald) suggest a <-- N-acetyl- hexosamine-hexose-N-acetylhexosamine-N- acetylhexosaminitolOD sequence. The ions at m/z 175 indicate that there is a 1-4 linkage between GlcNAc and N-acetylhexosaminitolOD. The ions at m/z 129 and m/z 182 suggest a hexosyl 1-4 N-acetylhexosamine structure in the cOmpound (109). These data, and the results of the sugar composition analyses, provide evidence that oligosaccharide C is 135 the pentasaccharide,,Man1-4GlcNAc-Man1- 4GlcNAc1-4GlcNAc. This pentasaccharide has been purified and characterized from the kidney of a fi-mannosidosis goat (109). Purified oligosaccharide C also co-chroma- tographed on TLC, in solvent 2, with the kidney pentasaccharide. 136 FIGURE 3-10. MASS SPECTRUM OF THE DEUTERIUM-LABELED PERMETHYLATED OLIGOSACCHARIDE ALDITOL FROM C AND THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE. Oligosaccharide C was reduced with NaB[2H]4 followed by permethylation as described in "Methods". The spectrum was recorded on a Hewlett- Packard quadrapole mass spectrometer at 40 eV. 137 N}... 000" Ow On 050 000 000 Oflo Odfl ORB OMB ODD ODD Oufl Oh“ «an I Man I w I... own I .. n mm x I it 2: Ohm DMD 001 00' 0“! Ohm OHM ODN on“ On“ 05% 00¢ 00 _ _ out own on ' «an vow canon . o x «o« I on« bum . as? 0 to x _ NWm ow. .“a b: _ . . . . - . . . . . . . Lquocwsamooa.m.3mu.oomI 2 1.3.9232 3.3.3565. In k k n .S\:ms. cm.ooml 2 In Ioocm 23.220 9.633.. 143 the core structure of N-linked sugar chains, are excreted in the urine (69,70). Since asparaginyl N-acetylglycos- amine amidohydrolase is deficient, it is expected that these patients would excrete large quantities of GlcNAc- Asn. A plausible explanation, therefore, is that these Asn-linked oligosaccharides arise from the accumulating GlcNAc-Asn by the action of glycosyltransferases. Although DS and TS are excreted in the urine of B-mannosidosis goats, the higher molecular weight oligosaccharides have not been detected in urine presumably because they accumulate at a much lower concentration in tissues. A series of complex oligosaccharides, migrating in the tetra- to hepta-saccharide region on thin-layer chromato- grams, have also been partially purified and characterized from affected goat liver (125). It is well documented that the structures of N-linked oligosaccharides of glyco- proteins are not only species-specific but also organ- specific (69,126). For example, the structures of the Asn- 1inked sugar chains of gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases, purified from the kidney and liver of various mammals, are dissimilar (69,126). A striking difference is that the sugar chains of liver gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase from all species do not have a bisecting GlcNAc. This probably means that GlcNAc transferase III, which is responsible for the addition of the bisecting GlcNAc to the core region of N-linked oligosaccharides, is not expressed in mammalian 144 liver. Identification of an organ-specific distribution of the higher molecular weight oligosaccharides (e.g., B, C1 and C) in goats must await complete structural character- ization of these compounds in liver and thyroid. It is possible that B, detected so far only in the thyroid of affected goats, represents an organ-specific oligosacc- haride. It is also plausible that the higher molecular weight oligosaccharides each accumulate at different concentrations, in various tissues, because of the differential expression and specificities of the processing and degradative enzymes. Therefore, those oligosacc- harides, accumulating at very low concentrations, may elude detection by present methods. In affected goat fibroblasts, DS and TS arise inde- pendently due to the action of endo-fi-N-acetylglucos- aminidase and asparaginyl-N-acetylglucosamine amido- hydrolase, respectively (Figure 3-11) (77). Of the two enzymes, asparaginyl-N-acetylglucosamine amidohydrolase has the greatest activity. This may account for the obser- vation that TS is the major storage oligosaccharide in 8- mannosidosis goat tissues and urine. However, the metabolic processes in fibroblasts may not be represen- tative of all tissues. The organ-specific expression of enzymatic activities and the possibility of metabolic interconversion of TS and D8 are also plausible explanations. 145 Endo-p-N-acetylglucosaminidase cleaves the chitobiose linkage in the core structure of N-linked oligosaccharides. The absence of this enzymatic activity in the kidneys of sheep, cattle and pig was recently documented (127). This presumably explains why a-mannosidosis cattle (96) and locoweed-intoxicated sheep (97) and pig (98) accumulate and excrete oligosaccharides with two GlcNAc residues at the reducing termini. Humans afflicted with disorders of glycoprotein catabolism (e.g., a-mannosidosis, fi- mannosidosis, a-fucosidosis and sialidosis) accumulate and excrete oligosaccharides with only one GlcNAc residue at the reducing terminui (69,70,78-82,103,104). This is because all human tissues contain both endo-B-N-acetyl- glucosaminidase and asparaginyl-N-acetylglucosamine amidohydrolase activities (77,127). The novel oligosaccharides Cl and C may be unique to the goat, secondary to the deficiency of fi-mannosidase, or they may represent previously undescribed N-linked oligo- saccharides. The detection of oligosaccharide C2 with an a- linked Man at the non-reducing end, in kidney (109), cannot be explained secondary to the fi-mannosidase deficiency (Figure 3-11). However, in other glycoproteinoses (e.g., a-mannosidosis, a-fucosidosis and aspartylglycosaminuria), many oligosaccharides also accumulate which are not expected on the basis of the enzymatic deficiencies (69,70,103,104). From these observations it is clear that 146 our knowledge of the catabolism of N-linked sugar chains of glycoproteins is incomplete. The concentrations of DS and TS are summarized by tissue, age and sex of fi-mannosidosis goats (Table 3-1). Both age and sex affect plasma B-mannosidase activity in mature control goats (128). However, B-mannosidase activity remains constant from birth to four weeks of age and sex has no effect on enzymatic activity in neonatal goats (128). Therefore, apparent unbiased comparisons can be made between the kidney and thyroid of a four-day-old female, the CNS and kidney of a three-week-old male and the CNS and PNS of a male and female, three and four weeks of age, respectively. In the four-day-old female goat, the thyroid accumulates approximately twice as much TS as the kidney. There is no apparent explanation for this difference. Perhaps, the activity of endo-fi-N-acetyl- glucosaminidase is lower in the thyroid than the kidney of affected goats. In normal adult and neonatal goat tissues, lysosomal fi-mannosidase activity is characterized by a hierarchy where thyroid > liver > kidney > brain (129). This may account for the greater concentration of TS in the thyroid. The kidney of the three-week-old male goat accumulates approximately three times more TS and DS as the CNS. The relative accumulation of TS and DS, when rank ordered, is conspicuously related to the normal routes for biological excretion. The CNS accumulates about eleven 147 .886 688%... So >3... 88w mfi no .3955 new 855. «5 e8... .8858. 8.2. me new 8 s .586 6888.. So .5...” 88 .93 .8 .855. use 80 mfi .85 .8882. mums me new 8 8 8.388898 85.8 858:8 83.8 85:8 8552.8... new .82 n .gfiumouo me. Showcase: 39.: no 603898 who .055 can 33..“ 33:3? Eu .9. one 8 no“ 853., .380 couuouuo Bpuu 9.53» um: no 0588... 395. mm oomudumxo was $515 05. .0053. 3.0m ofiggm -385 2» no mm: 3 8885.6 88.8.. 85 as. FEE“. I .8an a... 86.05 E .8882. Em: me use 8 s 3.83 £885 393 .58... eflud e.n 6.3 8385:. SH 38. 3.3.3 eflmd oém o5. 85.5 3.8. .833 35.8 e: .8765}... 6454 6.8 6.8 38:32 5.382350 Hg .95.». 6.3. 38.8 $8... eéuns e...” me .6855. we. was Jere 642.... 6.. mg 0855. x53 #885 .63 38.8 £31.. oéuoé To me m5 m3 was as...” 643.6 m6 sum 0sz Eu Hume 2 mum on: 8 m—. g 8.6.ggglfiggagEH—Eglggla Alma 148 times more TS, and the ratio of TS:DS is higher than the PNS. The pathophysiological and pathobiochemical significance of these differences are unknown. It is likely, however, that the greater accumulation of TS in the CNS contributes to the significant dysmyelinogensis in B- mannosidosis goats. The lower concentration of TS in the PNS may also be associated with the relative paucity of peripheral nerve abnormalities in affected goats. LIST OF REFERENCES 10. 11. 12. 13. VIII. REFERENCES Sharon, N. and Lis, H. (1981) Chemical and Engineering News fig, 21-44. Schachter, H (1984) Clin. Biochem. ll, 3-14. West, C.M. (1986) Mol. Cell. Biochem. 1;, 3- 20. Kobata, A. (1984) in Biology of Carbohydrates, Vol. 2 (Ginsburg, V. and Robbins, P.W., eds) pp. 88—161, John Wiley 8 Sons, New York. Baenziger, J.U. (1985) Am. J. Path. ;21, 382- 391. Aplin, J.D. and Hughes, R.G. (1982) Biochim. Biophys. Acta QQQ, 375-418. Mescher, M.F. (1981) TIBS April, 97-99. Reading, C.L. (1984) in The Biology of Glycoproteins (Ivatt, R.J., ed) pp. 235-321, Plenum Press, New York. Armant, D.R., Kaplan, H.A. and Lennarz, W.J. (1986) Devel. Biol. 1;;, 228-237. Nose, u. and Wigzell, H. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. fig, 6632-6636. Sairam, M.R. and Bhargavi, G.N. (1985) Science 222, 65-67. Kobata, A. (1972) Methods Enzymol. gg, 262— 271. Smith, D.F., Zoph, D.A. and Ginsburg, V. (1978) Methods Enzymol. 59, 221-228. 149 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 150 Kowkabany, G.N. in Advances in Carbohydrate Chemistry, Vol. 9 (Wolfrom, M.L. and Tipson, R.S., eds) pp. 303-339, Academic Press, New York. Yamashita, K., Mizuochi, T. and Kobata, A. (1982) Methods Enzymol. g1, 105-126. Blake, D.A. and Goldstein, I.J. (1982) Methods Enzymol. Q3, 127-132. Holmes, R.W. and O'Brien, J.S. (1979) Anal. Biochem. 2;, 167-170. Wing, R.E. and BeMiller, J.N. (1972) in Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry, Vol. 6 (Whistler, R.L. and BeMiller, J.N., eds) pp. 60-95 Acadmic Press, New York. Wells, G.B., Kontoyiannidou, V., Turco, S.J. and Lester, R.L. (1982) Methods Enzymol. g1, 132-137. Honda, S. (1984) Anal. Biochem. 140, 1-7. Kakehi, K. and Honda, S. (1986) J. Chromatogr. 212, 27-34. . McGinnis, C.D., Laver, M.L. and Biermann, C.J. (1989) in Analysis of Carbohydrates by GLC and MS (Biermann, C.J. and (McGinnis, C.D., eds) pp. 19-26, CRC Press, Inc., Florida. McNeil, M., Darvill, A.S., Oman, P., Franzin, L.-E. and Albersheim, P. (1982) Methods Enzymol. 51, 3-45. Sawardeker, J.S., Sloneker, J.H. and Jeanes, A.R. (1965) Anal. Chem. 31, 1602-1604. Albersheim, P., Nevins, D.J., English, P.D. and Karr, A. (1967) Carbohydr. Res. g, 340- 345. Sweeley, C.C., Bentley R., Makita, M. and Wells, W.W. (1963) J. Am. Chem. Soc. §§, 2497- 2507. Takasaki, S. and Kobata, A. (1974) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 1g, 783-788. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 151 Lennartson, G., Lundblad, A., Lundsten, J., Svensson, S. and Hager, A. (1978) Eur. J. Biochem. g1, 325-329. Lundblad, A., Svensson, S., Low, B., Messeter, L. and Cedergren, B. (1980) Eur. J. Biochem. 101,0323-327. Nilsson, B. and Zoph, D. (1982) Methods Enzymol. 83, 46-58. Biermann, C.J. (1989) in Analysis of Carbohydrates by GLC and MS (Biermann, C.J. and McGinnis, C.D., eds) pp. 1-17, CRC Press, Inc., Florida. - Hakomori, S.-I. (1964) J. Biochem. (Tokyo), 55, 205-208. Finne, J., Krusius, T. and Rauvala, H. (1980) Carbohydr. Res. 50, 336-339. Wang, W.-T., Matsuura, F. and Sweeley, C.C. (1983) 135, 398-405. Stellner, K., Saito, H. and Hakomori, S.-I. (1973) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1§ , 464-472. Karkkainen, J. (1970) Carbohydr. Res. _A, 27- 33. Karkkainen, J. (1971) Carbohydr. Res. _1, 1- 10. Karkkainen, J. (1971) Carbohydr. Res. _1, 11- 18. Wang, W.-T., LeDonne, N.C., Ackerman, B. and Sweeley, C.C. (1984) Anal. Biochem. 15;, 366- 381. Geyer, R., Geyer, H., Kuhnhardt, S., Mink, W. and Stirm, S. (1983) Anal. Biochem. 133, 197- 207. . Yamashita, K., Tachibana, Y., Takada, S., Matsuda, I., Arashima, S. and Kobata, A. (1979) J. Biol. Chem. 2§5,4820-4827. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. so. 51. 52. 152 Wong, C.G., Sung, S-S. J. and Sweeley, C.C. (1980) in Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry, Vol. VIII (Whistler, R.L. and BeMiller, J.N., eds) pp. 133-143, Academic Press, Inc., New York. Biermann, C.J. (1989) in Analysis of Carbohydrates by GLC and MS Biermann, C.J. and McGinnis, G.D., eds) pp. 27-41, CRC Press, Inc., Florida.. McCleary, B.V. and Matheson, N.K. (1986) Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 44, 147-154. Kakehi, K. and Honda, S. (1989) in Analysis of Carbohydrates by GLC and MS (Biermann, C.J. and McGinnis, G.D., eds.) pp. 43-85, CRC Press, Inc., Florida. Fox, A., Morgan, S.L. and Gilbert J. (1989) in Analysis of Carbohydrates by GLC and MS (Biermann, C.J. and McGinnis, G.D., eds) pp. 87-117, CRC Press, Inc., Florida. McGinnis, G.D. and Biermann, C.J. (1989) in Analysis of Carbohydrates by GLC and MS (Biermann, C.J. and McGinnis, G.D., eds) pp. 119-141, CRC Press, Inc., Florida. Neeser, J.-R. and Schweizer, T.F. (1989) in Analysis of Carbohydrates by GLC and MS (Biermann, C.J. and McGinnis, G.D., eds) pp. 143-155, CRC Press, Inc., Florida. Carpita, N.C. and Shea, B.M. (1989) in Analysis of Carbohydrates by GLC and MS (Biermann, C.J. and McGinnis, G.D., eds) pp. 157-216, CRC Press, Inc., Florida. Reinhold, V.N. and Carr, S.A. (1983) Mass Spectrometry Reviews 2, 153-221. Dell, A. and Thomas-Oates, J.E. (1989) in Analysis of Carbohydrates by GLC and MS (Biermann, C.J. and McGinnis, G.D., eds) pp. 217-235, CRC Press, Inc., Florida. Englmaier, P., Honda, S. and Biermann, C.J. (1989) in Analysis of Carbohydrates by GLC and MS (Biermann, C.J. and McGinnis, G.D., eds) pp. 257-273, CRC Press, Inc., Florida. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. 153 Barker, R., Nunez, M.A., Rosevear, P. and Serianni,A.S. (1982) Methods Enzymol. 3;, 58- 69. Dabrowski, J., Hanfland, P. and Egge, H. (1982) Methods Enzymol. 5;, 69-86. Englmaier, P. (1989) in Analysis of Carbohydrates by GLC and MS (Biermann, C.J. and McGinnis, G.D., eds) pp. 127-141, CRC Press, Inc., Florida. Tai, T., Yamashita, K., Ogata-Arakawa, M., Koide, N., Muramatsu, T., Iwashita, S., Inove, Y. and Kobata, A. (1975) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 8569-8575. Yamashita, K., Ichishima, E., Arai, M. and Kobata, A. (1980) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 26, 1335-1342. Yamashita, K., Ohkura, T., Yoshima, H. and Kobata, A. (1981) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 129, 226-232. Trimble, R.B., Tarentino, A.L., Aumick, G.E. and Maley, F. (1982) Methods Enzymol. fig, 603- 610. Kobata, A. (1982) Methods Enzymol. §;, 625- 631. . Elder, J.H. and Alexander, S. (1982) Proc. “3111. AcadoSCio U.S.A. 12, 4540-45440 Tarentino, A.L., Gomez, G.M. and Plummer, T.H. (1985) Biochem. 24, 4665-4671. Plummer, T.H., Elder, J.H., Alexander, S., Phelan, A.W. and Tarentino, A.L. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 252, 10700-10704. Ginsburg, V. (1972) Methods Enzymol gfi, 699- 897. ‘ Kobata, A. (1979) Anal. Biochem. 109, 1-14. Plummer, T.H. and Tarentino, A.L. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256, 10243-10246. Tarentino, A.L., Gomez, G.M. and Plummer, T.H. (1985) BIOChem. 24 4665-4671. 68. 69. 70. 71. 72. 73. 74. 75. 76. 77. 78. 79. 80. 81. 154 Glew, R.H., Basu, A., Prence, B.M. and Ramaley, A.T. (1985) Lab. Invest. 52, 250-269. Kobata, A. (1984) in Biology of Carbohydrates, Volume 2 (Ginsburg, V. and Robbins, P.W., eds) pp. 87-161, John Wiley & Sons, New York. Beaudet, A.L. (1983) in The Metabolic Basis of Inherited Disease (Stanbury, J.B., Wyngaarden, W.B., Fredrickson, D.S., Goldstein, J.L. and Brown, M.S., eds) pp. 788-802, McGraw Hill, New York. 4 Jones, M.Z. and Dawson, G. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256, 5181-5188. Healey, P.J., Seaman, J.T., Gardner, I.A. and Sewell, C.A. (1981) Aust. Vet. J. 51, 504-507. Dawson, G. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 3369- 3371. Jones, M.Z., Rathke, E.J.S., Cavanagh, K. and Hancock, L.W. (1984) J. Inher. Metab. Dis. 1, 80-95 0 Pearce, R.D., Callahan, J.W., Little, P.B., Armstrong, D.K. and Clarke, J.T.R. (1987) Biochem. J. 211, 603-609. Cavanagh, K., Dunstan, R.W. and Jones, M.Z. (1982) Am. J. Vet. Res. 13, 1058-1059. Hancock, L.W., Jones, M.Z. and Dawson, G. (1986) Biochem. J. 234, 175-183. Wenger, D.A., Sujanski, E., Fennessey, P.V. and Thompson, J.N. (1986) N. Engl. J. Med. :15, 1201-1205. Cooper, A., Sardharwalla, I.B. and Roberts, M.M. (1986) N. Engl. J. Med. 315, 1231. Cooper, A., Hatton, C. and Sardharwalla, I.B. (1987) J. Inher. Metab. Dis. 10, 229-233. Cooper, A., Hatton, C., Thornley, M. and Sardharwalla, I.B. (1988) J. Inher. Metab. Dis. 11, 17-29.‘ 82. 83. 84. 85. 86. 87. 88. 89. 90. 91. 92. 93. 94. 95. 155 O'Brien, J.S. (1983) in The Metabolic Basis of Inherited Disease (Stanbury, J.B., Wyngaarden, J.B., Fredrickson, D.S., Goldstein, J.L. and Brown, M.S., eds) pp. 945-969, McGraw Hill, New York. Warner, T.G. and O'Brien, J.S. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 224-232. Burditt, L.T., Chotai, K., Hirani, S., Nugent, P.G., Winchester, B. and Blakemore, W.F. (1980) Biochem. J. 182. 467-473. Abraham, D., Blakemore, W.F., Jolly, R.D., Sidebotham, R. and Winchester, B. (1983) Biochem. J. 215, 573-579. Cantz, M., Gehler, J. and Spranger, J. (1977) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 14, 732-738. Durand, P., Borrone, C. and Della Cella, G. (1969) J. Pediat. 15, 665-674. Okada, S. and O'Brien, J.S. (1968) Science 1§Q, 1002-1004. Sandhoff, K., Harzer, K., Wassle, W. and Jatzkewitz, H. (1971) J. Neurochem. 18, 2469- 2489. Autio, S., Norden, N.E., Ockerman, P.-A., Riekkinen, P., Rapola, J. and Louheimo, T. (1973) Acta Pediat. Scand. 62, 555-565. Palo, J., Riekkinen, P., Arstila, A.U., Autio, S. and Kivimaki, T. (1972) Acta Neuropath. 20, 217-224. Baker, H.J., Lindsey, J.R., McKhann, G.M. and Farrell, D.F. (1971) Science 174, 838-839. Cork, L.C., Munnell, J.F., Lorenz, M.D., Murphy, J.V., Baker, H.J. and Rattazzi, M.C. (1977) Science 196, 1014-1017. Phillips, N.C., Robinson, D., Winchester, B.G. and Jolly, R.D. (1974) Biochem. J. 137. 363- 371. Raghavan, S., Stuer, G., Riviere, L., Alroy, J. and Kolodny, E.H. (1988) J. Inher. Metab. Dis. 1;, 3-16. 96. 97. 98. 99. 100. 101. 102. 103. 104. 105. 106. 107. 108. 109. 110. 156 Lundblad, A., Nilsson, B., Norden, N.E., Svensson, S., Ockerman, P.-A. and Jolly, R.D. (1975) Eur. J. Biochem. 22, 601-605. Daniel, P.F., Warren, C.D. and James, L.F. (1984) Biochem. J. 221, 601-607. Tulsiani, D.R.P., Broquist, H.P., James, L.F. and Touster, O. (1984) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 212, 76-85. Michalski, J.C., Strecker, G., Fournet, B., Cantz, M. and Spranger, J. (1977) FEBS Lett. 12, 101-112. Tsay, G.C., Dawson, G. and Sung, S.-S.J. (1976) J. Biol. Chem. 221, 5852-5859. Wolfe, L.S., Senior, R.G. and Ng Ying Kin, N.K.K. (1974) J. Biol. Chem. 25 , 1828-1838. Warren, C.D., Sadeh, 8., Daniel, P.F., Bergge, B., James, L.F. and Jeanloz, R.W. (1983) FEBS Lett 122, 99-103. Yamashita, K., Tachibana, Y., Mihara, K., Okada, S., Yabuuchi, H. and Kobata, A. (1980) J. Biol. Chem 2§§, 5126-5133. Matsuura, F., Nunez, H.A., Grabowski, G.A. and Sweeley, C.C. (1981) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 207, 337-352. Jones, M.Z. and Laine, R.A. Biol. Chem 2§§, 5181-5184. Frei, J.I., Matsuura, F. and Jones, M.Z. (1984) Fed. Proc. 22, 1553. (1981) J. Frei, J.I., Matsuura, F., Rathke, E.J.S. and Jones, M.Z. (1986) Fed. Proc. 22, 1955. Matsuura, F., Laine, R.A. and Jones, M.Z. (1981) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 221, 485-493. Matsuura, F. and Jones, M.Z. Biol. Chem. 2§Q, 15239-15245. (1985) J. Dahl, D.L., Warren, C.D., Rathke, E.J.S. and Jones, M.Z. (1986) J. Inher. Metab. Dis. 2, 93-98. 111. 112. 113. 114. 115. 116. 117. 118. 119. 120. 121. 122. 123. 157 Matsuura, F., Jones, M.Z. and Frazier, S.E. (1983) Biochem. Biophys. Acta 759, 67-73. Jones, M.Z., Cunningham, J.G., Dade, A.W., Alessi, D.M., Mostosky, U.V., Vorro, J.R., Benitez, J.T. and Lovell, K.L. (1983) J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 22, 268-285. Jones, M.Z., Cunningham, J.G., Dade, A.W., Dawson, G., Laine, R.A., Williams, C.S.F., Alessi, D.M., Mostosky, U.V. and Vorro, J.R. (1982) in Animal Models of Inherited Diseases (Desnick, R.J., Patterson, D.F. and Scarpelli, D.G., eds) pp. 165-176, Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York. Hartley, W.J. and Blakemore, W.F. Neuropathol. (Berl) 22, 325-333. and Jones, (Berl) 52. and Jones, (Berl) 55. Nishigaki, M., Yamashita, K., Matsuda, I., Arashima, S. and Kobata, A. (1978) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 25, 823-834. Kobata, A. and Ginsburg, V. Chem. 247, 1525-1529. (1973) Acta Lovell, K.L. Neuropathol. M.Z. (1983) Acta 121-126. Lovell, K.L. Neuropathol. M.Z. (1985) Acta 293-299. (1972) J. Biol. Dubois, M., Gilles, R.A., Hamilton, J.R., Rebers, P.A. and Smith, F. (1956) Anal. Chem. 22, 350-356. Endo, Y., Yamashita, K., Tachibana, Y., Tojo, S. and Kobata, A. (1979) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 22, 669-679. Yamashita, K., Tachibana, Y., Shichi, H. and Kobata, A., (1973) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 22, 135-147. Stellner, K., Saito, H. and Hakomori, S. (1973) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 152, 464-472. Kochetkov, N.K. and Chizhov, O.S. Carbohydr. Chem. 21, 39-93. (1966) Adv. 124. 125. 126. 127. 128. 129. 158 Kochetkov, N.K. and Chizhov, 0.8. (1972) in Methods in CarbOhydrate Chemistry (Whistler, R.L. and BeMiller, J.N., eds) Vol VI, pp. 540- 554, Academic Press, New York. Jones, M.Z., Matsuura, F., Rathke, E.J.S. and DeLahunta, A. (1986) Fed. Proc. 22, 1956. Yamashita, K., Hitoi, A., Tateishi, N., Higashi, T., sakamoto, Y. and Kobata, A. (1983) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 225, 993-996. Song, 2, Li, s.-c. and Li, Y.-T. (1988) Biochem. J. 223, 145-149. Dunstan, R.W. (1982) MA Thesis, Dept. of Pathology, Michigan State University. Pearce, R.D., Callahan, J.W., Little, P.B., Armstrong, D.K. and Clarke, J.T.R. (1987) Biochem. J. 232, 603-609. ABSTRACT HORPHOHETRIC EVALUATION OF PERIPHERAL NERVE CHAPTER 4 Samples of right and left sciatic, peroneal and tibial nerves were obtained at necropsy from a fi- mannosidosis goat and an age- and sex-matched control goat. The samples were fixed in 4% glutaraldehyde embedded in Epon-Araldite. The blocks were sectioned (2 pm) and stained with toluidine blue. Cross-sections of each nerve were examined by light microscopy and three fascicle types in each nerve, designated types 1, 2 and 3, were qualitatively identified. Measurements of myelinated axon diameter were taken from randomly selected fascicle types, in each nerve, using a Joyce/Loebl Magiscan 2a image analyzer. The individual data points were transformed and the resulting distribution of axon diameters was approximately normal. The statistical model used for the analysis of the data is a factorial arrangement of the treatments (genotypes and peripheral nerve) in a randomized complete block. 159 160 In the B-mannosidosis in goat, there was a statistically significant (p < 0.005) reduction in the mean myelinated axon diameter of the peripheral nerves analysed. This provides preliminary evidence that the phenotypic expression of B-mannosidosis may include alterations in peripheral nerve axonal size. The presence of a statistically significant (p < 0.001) heterogeneity between the mean myelinated axon diameters of sciatic, peroneal and tibial nerves is characteristic of both control and affected goats. The model presented is effective in conducting tests of significance when the inherent variability in the data is extensive. 161 I. INTRODUCTION The PNS is conceptualized as including primary sensory neurons, lower motor neurons and autonomic neurons that lie outside of the CNS (1). Many neurons with peripheral projections, however, lie partly within both the PNS and CNS and are vulnerable to disease processes that affect either. The cell body of a large sensory neuron in a lumbar dorsal root ganglion, for example, has a peripheral projection that ends distally in the foot and a central process that synapses in the gracile nucleus in the brainstem (1). This cell and its processes, with an extensive linear extent (170 cm), are associated with thousands of supporting cells in the PNS and CNS. The perikaryon of the nerve cell body, however, is the main source of metabolic support. The perikaryon is a mini protein factory and its products are transported to the rest of the neuron by a process known as axoplasmic transport. Nerve cells require this highly developed protein delivery system to maintain structural, biochemical and physiological competence which facilitates their functions in the periphery. These functions include the 162 conduction of nerve impulses, neurotransmitter release and the uptake and turnover of constituents in the axonal membrane (2). Stages that have been identified in rapid axoplasmic transport are: (a) entry of newly synthesized proteins and organelles into the proximal axon, (b) distally directed or anterograde transport, (c) arrival at the destination or incorporation into some local structure, (d) turnaround, (e) rapid saltatory retrograde transport and (f) lysosomal digestion (3). Defects in each stage have been documented in a variety of acquired, hereditary and toxic neuropathies (3). Peripheral nerves are made up of single nerve fibers or axons that are arranged into bundles or fasciculi which are covered with a loose connective tissue known as the perineurium. Many fasciculi (twenty or more), depending on the site and size of the nerve, comprise a peripheral nerve trunk which is surrounded by epineurium. Individual axons have a delicate connective tissue covering called the endoneurium. Each fascicle has both myelinated and unmyelinated axons which vary in outside diameter from 2 to 22 um and 0.2 to 2.0 um, respectively (1). Axon diameter can be used for classifying nerve fiber populations and, in some observations, has been correlated with functional characteristics (4). Myelin is a specialized infolding of the fused Schwann cell plasma membrane and is anatomically distinct 163 from the axon. Schwann cells are ubiquitious in the PNS and ensheath both myelinated and unmyelinated axons. There is one Schwann cell per myelin segment in the PNS. By contrast, in the CNS there is a relative paucity of oligodendroglia, the myelin-forming cells. This may partially explain why the CNS is particularly vulnerable to defects in myelination (4). The node of Ranvier represents the junction between the myelin sheaths of two adjacent Schwann cells. Internodal length (the segment of myelin between two consecutive nodes of Ranvier) and myelin sheath thickness are both proportional to axon size (1). Myelin sheath thickness is proportional to the conduction velocity of the axon and is decreased in a variety of demyelinating and dysmyelinating diseases (5-9). Unmyelinated axons have much slower conduction velocities than myelinated axons and, in human cutaneous nerves, subserve modalities of sensation, pain, temperature and autonomic functions (1). Myelination in the PNS begins prenatally when axons are approximately 1.0 pm in diameter (5). The initiation of myelinogenesis involves both neuronal size and other axonal signals, as yet undefined, since many axons remain unmyelinated (5,6). It is now known that normal axons influence the multiplication and differentiation of Schwann cells and the thickness and length of the myelin internode (10). Schwann cells also exert significant effects on axons. They supply nutrients and trophic factors and 164 influence ionic exchange, transmitter action and axon caliber (10). Peripheral nerve fibers are also influenced by their immediate environment. The connective tissue surrounding the nerves provides mechanical support and protection and may regulate the entry of ions and other molecules (10). In addition the extracellular matrix is necessary for the ensheathment of axons by Schwann cells and helps to regulate intraneural pressure (10). The maturation of peripheral nerve fibers, therefore, involves processes whereby axons, Schwann cells and the extracellular matrix increase in size and influence each other in a complex series of interdependent events. II. BASIC PATHOLOGICALINECHANISHS Three basic pathological processes by which peripheral nerve fibers are affected have been described (11). These are Wallerian degeneration, segmental demyelination and axonal degeneration. Wallerian degeneration results from transection of an axon whereby both the myelin sheath and axon degenerate distal to the site of transection. Chromatolysis of the nerve cell body may be evident, especially with proximal lesions. If motor axons are transected, then the muscles they serve undergo denervation atrophy. Schwann cells also proliferate distally to the transection. Regeneration begins almost immediately although it is a slow process and may be incomplete. The extent of recovery depends on age, 165 distance between the severed ends and location of the lesion. Generally, distal transections are associated with a better outcome. Segmental demyelination implies destruction of the myelin sheath leaving the axon intact. Demyelination often begins at the nodes of Ranvier and results in a marked slowing or block of nerve conduction. If motor nerves are involved, the muscles undergo disuse atrophy. Chromato- lysis of the nerve cell body does not occur and Schwann cell proliferation is not as brisk as in Wallerian degeneration. Categories of CNS and PNS demyelinating diseases, in humans and animals, include toxic (e.g., hexachlorophene and diphtheritic neuropathies), immunological and infectious (e.g., multiple sclerosis and coonhound paralysis), metabolic (e.g., vitamin 812 deficiency, vitamin B5 neuropathy and generalized malnutrition), traumatic (e.g., edema and compression) and genetic (e.g., metachromatic leukodystrophy and Krabbes disease) (12). In some of the acquired disorders, remyelination is possible and recovery is rapid and usually complete once the offending agent (e.g., toxin) is removed or neutralized. In the genetic disorders recovery does not occur to any appreciable extent, even though Schwann cells proliferate, because decreased myelin formation results from dysmyelinogenesis (abnormal development of myelin). In various lysosomal storage diseases, Schwann cells also 166 accumulate abnormal cytoplasmic deposits (1). Proposed mechanisms operative in dysmyelinogenesis, in both the PNS and CNS, include biochemical damage to the axon and/or parent Schwann cell or oligodendrocyte, damage to the myelin sheath or simultaneous damage to the myelin sheath and myelin-forming cells (12,13). Axonal degeneration results from a metabolic impairment of the whole neuron and is associated with breakdown of the myelin sheath (secondary demyelination). Chromatolysis may be present in severe cases and conduction is blocked completely. Schwann cell proliferation is more indolent and prolonged than in Wallerian degeneration. Recovery may occur by regeneration of axons that reinnervate denervated structures in the periphery. Monomeric acrylamide, for example, produces a distal axonal degeneration in both humans and laboratory animals (11). III. METHODS USED IN THE STUDY OF PERIPHERAL NERVE Because peripheral neurons are extremely diverse in shape, relatively dispersed in their distribution (both in the PNS and CNS) and associated with a variety of cell types, specialized sampling procedures and methods are needed to characterize the abnormalities. It is also impossible to perform a complete examination of the PNS because it has many extensions throughout the body. In addition, the interpretation of pathological alterations is problematic because the functional properties of a nerve 167 fiber cannot be reliably inferred from its morphological characteristics. It is generally impossible to distinguish, for example, motor from sensory fibers or unmyelinated dorsal root fibers from post-ganglionic sympathetic unmyelinated fibers (14). Interpreting pathological change is also difficult because not all alterations can be attributed to injury at the site of sampling. The initial pathological process may arise from a more proximal site of injury. For accurate and reliable interpretations, it is necessary to concurrently evaluate nerves, taken at the same level, from age- and, when possible, sex-matched controls since there are marked species, age and fiber-to-fiber variations (14). A. BIOPSY Biopsy of peripheral nerves is invaluable for the diagnosis and categorization of peripheral neuropathies. Biopsy material is used for histopathological, biochemical and morphometric studies. A nerve selected for biopsy should ideally be a motor or cutaneous nerve affected by the neuropathic process, constant in location, easily accessible and available to neurophysiological study in 2119 prior to biopsy (14). Sural, peroneal, saphenous and sciatic nerves are commonly biopsied. Interpretation of peripheral nerve biopsies allows a specific tissue diagnosis in leprosy, sarcoidosis, 168 amyloidosis, myxedema neuropathy, metachromatic leukodystrophy and Krabbes, Fabrys and Tangier diseases (14). B. BIOCHEMICAL STUDIES. Biochemical studies of peripheral nerve have been limited by a number of technical difficulties encountered in sample preparation and neurochemical detection. Whole nerve is approximately two-thirds perineurium and epineurium and only one-third neural tissue. This large quantity of fibrous connective tissue makes it difficult to process samples and contributes significantly to contamination. A microdissection method has been developed to separate endoneurium (axons, myelin, Schwann cells and stroma) from the epineurium and perineurium (5). Neurochemical detection techniques are, in many instances, inadequate for analyzing small biopsy samples. Because there are many constituents in nerve tissue, samples must be analyzed using sensitive and specific procedures to detect subtle changes in molecular composition. The PNS has received increasing attention in regard to lipid and glycoprotein composition and metabolism. Knowledge concerning the structure and function of these macromolecules in the PNS, however, is at a rudimentary level. Interpretation of current 169 evidence indicates that peripheral nerves contain enzymes that synthesize, modify and degrade fatty acids and complex lipids by the generally established pathways of lipid metabolism. Lipid biosynthesis is pronounced during early development and remyelina- tion, whereas mature nerve has only limited biosynthetic activity except for the rapid turnover of the inositol phospholipids (15). Most studies of glycoproteins in the PNS have focused on the ones isolated from peripheral nerve myelin (16). A significant number of these glyco- proteins are directly involved in the synthesis and maintenance of myelin. It is now known, however, that most structural proteins and those associated with the axon and Schwann cell are glycosylated (16). Given the significant functional and biochemical properties of glycoproteins, it is likely that alterations in their expression and/or regulation are primary causes for both acquired and inherited neuropathies (5-9,15-20). C. MORPHOHETRY Traditionally, the analysis of the changes characteristic of a disease or progression of a disease entailed mainly a description of the morphological alterations. This technique is relatively accurate if the structural alterations 170 effect only qualitative differences. In reality, however, most diseases will cause both qualitative and quantitative variations and, therefore, may not be effectively diagnosed using only qualitative methods. To identify, distinguish and differentiate between the normal and diseased states, morphometric techniques can be used to evaluate both qualitative and quantitative changes. The qualitative changes, for example, can often be arranged in a frequency table and analyzed by statistical methods such as the Chi-square test. The quantitative changes prior to statistical analyses must, however, satisfy conditions relating to their distribution, independence and variance. In the application of morphometric methods to define and interpret diseases, variables including axon diameter and density (number per unit area),- shape, nuclear area and nuclear diameter of cells have been useful (21,22). The morphometric analyses of peripheral nerve, however, is based on a number of variables including: (a) the size frequency distribution of neuronal cell bodies and unmyelinated and myelinated axons, (b) nuclear and ganglion volume, (c) thickness of the myelin sheath, (d) the ratio of axon diameter to total fiber diameter for 171 myelinated axons (9 ratio), (e) the ratio of the number of myelin lamellae to axonal circumference and (f) the density of cell bodies, myelinated and unmyelinated axons and Schwann cells (4,14,23-33). Measurements are usually taken from selected areas of photo- or electron-micrographs using automatic or semi-automatic image analyzers. Although unmyelinated fibers and Schwann cells can be identified with a light microscope, electron micrographs are needed for accurate and reliable measurements. The objective of morphometric analyses in PNS is, therefore, to determine the number, size distribution and shape of defined populations of cell bodies and/or their axons at predetermined levels. Such quantitative data is used to characterize morphological alterations with respect to development and differentiation, disease processes and various environmental and toxic exposures. The collection of morphometric data is accompanied by the problem of statistical analyses. If the frequency distributions are unimodal then routine analyses (e.g., parametric methods) are adequate. However, if the frequency distributions are multimodal then it is often necessary to find other methods (e.g., non-parametric tests) or develop specific mathematical models to describe the IV. 172 frequency distributions of the data. The problems inherent in morphometry are summarized in the following quote. fiMorphological interpretation based on morphometry is liable to several faults. It can be wrong or ungrounded if the statistical analysis of data is not performed properly. Conversely, worthy pieces of information may remain unrecognized if adequate statistical methods are not employed. These considerations suggest that good research design is essential to morphometry; in particular, the procedure used to record and work out data should be chosen carefully. Unfortunately, pathologists are often unaware of the many pitfalls of statistics which may weaken the value of results of accurate and tedious morphometric counts" (22). PATHOLOGY OF THE PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM IN THE LESOSOHAL STORAGE DISEASES The PNS pathology identified in the lysosomal storage diseases are associated with involvement of the CNS or as part of a multi-system disorder. In several of the Sphingolipidoses, the PNS abnormalities have been well documented. In Fabrys disease, an X-linked recessive disorder in humans characterized by a deficiency in the activity of a-galactosidase A, there is a discrete loss of primarily large unmyelinated and small myelinated axons in all nerves biopsied (9,19,33). One morphometric study, however, documented the loss of large myelinated fibers and 173 a decrease in the average diameter of unmyelinated axons (34). The excruciating pain in the lower extremity and loss of sweating, which are clinical characteristics of this disorder, may result from the selective loss of these fiber categories. Pleomorphic lipid inclusions, presumably representing the uncatabolized substrate, are seen in the cytoplasm of perineurial, endothelial and Schwann cells and unmyelinated and myelinated axons. Segmental demyelination is mild and may be secondary to a primary perikaryal lesion (e.g., storage of lipid) (9). Neurons in the CNS are only slightly involved which may account for the relatively fewer cases of mental retardation in Fabrys disease. Metachromatic leukodystrophy and Krabbes disease comprise a group of disorders characterized by extensive myelin degeneration in both the CNS and PNS. The morphological findings in each of these two disorders are very characteristic, therefore, peripheral nerve biopsy is an accepted and reliable means of diagnosis. Metachromatic leukodystrophy results from the deficiency of arylsulfatase A with the subsequent tissue accumulation of sulfatide. In the PNS, there is a reduction in myelinated fibers, decreased myelin sheath thickness of the remaining myelinated fibers and areas of segmental demyelination and remyelination. Small onion bulbs (concentric Schwann cell proliferation) and metachromatic membrane-bound inclusion bodies, in the cytoplasm of Schwann cells, are also 174 observed (9,20). The metachromatic granules represent lysosomes packed with the uncatabolized sulfatide (9). Depressed deep-tendon reflexes and decreased nerve conduction are detected clinically (20). In Krabbes disease, the PNS pathology includes a reduction in myelinated fiber density and areas of segmental demyelination and remyelination (9,20). The remaining myelin sheaths are abnormally thin and small onion bulb formations are present. The cytoplasm of Schwann cells, associated with both myelinated and unmyelinated axons, also contain straight, prismatic or tubular inclusions (20). Motor nerve conduction is decreased in about 50% of cases (20). Krabbes disease results from the deficiency of galactocerebroside-fi- galactosidase which is responsible for the accumulation of galactocerebroside (19,20). The mutant mouse twitcher is an animal model for Krabbes disease in humans and has similar PNS pathology (20,36). Morphological abnormalities of the PNS in the other sphingolipidoses (Gauchers, Tay-Sachs, and Niemann Picks diseases) are confined to Schwann cell inclusion bodies and occasional segmental demyelination (20,37,38). Schwann cell inclusion bodies and some axonal degeneration are also observed in the mucopolysaccharidoses (Hurlers, Hunters and Sanfilippos syndromes) (20). In Pompes disease (a-gluco- sidase deficiency), there is extensive accumulation of 175 glycogen in peripheral nerve axons and Schwann cells which is associated with either axonal loss or segmental demyelination (20). A description of the pathological abnormalities of the PNS in the glycoproteinoses, represented by a-manno- sidosis, a-fucosidosis, sialidosis, aspartylglycosaminuria and fi-mannosidosis, is generally lacking. Each disease, in humans and animals, is characterized pathologically by the tissue storage of uncatabolized oligosaccharides and clinically by mental and growth retardation, skeletal dysplasia and fascial dysmorphia (39,40). In sialidosis type 1, clinical findings also include a painful neuropathy similar to Fabrys disease, increased deep-tendon reflexes and delayed nerve conduction (39). Caprine fi-mannosidosis is associated with profound neurological dysfunction and CNS dysmyelinogenesis present at birth (40,42). The lesions in the CNS of fi-mannosidosis goats are well documented (20,40-42), however, the PNS defects are less defined (43). The PNS abnormalities detected so far are the formation of axonal spheroids and cytoplasmic vacuolation of Schwann cells (40,43). Axonal spheroids have been reported only in the distal sensory PNS (gingiva) and are associated with the accumulation of dense bodies, in both unmyelinated and myelinated axons, and myelin loss. Unlike the CNS myelin paucity, loss of peripheral nerve myelin is most prominently associated with 176 the presence of axonal spheroids. The occurrence of Schwann and anterior horn cell vacuolation and muscle weakness, however, justifies further investigation of PNS axonal and/or myelin deficits in caprine fi-mannosidosis. 177 V. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM It was hypothesized that the extensive Schwann cell vacuolation and/or factors producing the CNS dysmyelino- gensis may effect axonal diameter in the PNS. The objective of this study was, therefore, to develop a model to determine if the diameter and/or density of myelinated axons in selected peripheral nerves are different between control and B-mannosidosis goats. The diameter and density (number of axons/mmz) of myelinated axons were analyzed to determine if these parameters are altered in B-manno- sidosis. If there are significant differences between affected and control nerves, this work may provide a method for further study of the size, density, distribution and regional variation of both myelinated and unmyelinated axons in the PNS. In this study, the approach entails the statistical comparison of the mean axon diameters in selected peripheral nerves from a control and a 8- mannosidosis goat. 178 MATERIALS AND METHODS A. ANIMALS Tissues were obtained at necropsy from affected goats in the MSU fi-mannosidosis breeding colony. The fi-mannosidosis goats were identified by neurological deficits and absence of plasma fi-mannosidase activity (44). Control tissues were also obtained at necropsy from age-matched and, when possible, sex-matched goats. Four-day-old male (V 95) and 4-week-old female (V 72) affected goats and their controls, 4- day-old male (V 94) and 4-week-old male (V 80) goats, respectively, were anesthetized with Surital (i.v.). The tissues were then fixed by intracardiac perfusion and processed as described previously (42). A four- day-old female (V 204) affected goat and the age-sex- matched control (Z 26) were each given a lethal injection of T-6l (i.v.) before removal of tissues. B. TISSUE COLLECTION Samples of cranial nerves V and VIII were obtained from all animals except V 204 and z 26 prior to this study. Samples of right and left sciatic, peroneal and tibial nerves were collected from V 204 and z 26. The nerves were exposed in each thigh and dissected free of perineural fat and connective tissue. A segment (2.0-2.5 cm) of sciatic nerve was removed first followed by segments (1.5-2.0 cm) of 179 peroneal and tibial nerves. Right and left segments from each nerve were removed from approximately the same level. The proximal and distal ends of each segment were ligated in 2122 with nylon thread before excision. C. FIXATION, STAINING AND SECTIONING A small weight was hung on the distal end of each nerve to ensure proper tension during fixation. The samples were hung in vials containing 4% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 for 2 h at 4°C. The nerve segments were then trimmed, fixed an additional 2 h in the glutaraldehyde solution, post-fixed in osmium tetroxide, stained en bloc with uranyl acetate, dehydrated through a series of alcohols and embedded in Epon-Araldite. The blocks were sectioned (2 pm) and stained with toluidine blue. D. COLLECTION OF DATA The sections of each cranial nerve were examined by light microscopy and kodachromes (slides) of selected areas were taken (magnification x 160). The slides were projected onto a screen (final magnifi- cation x 1000) and the minimum diameter of each axon was traced with a black felt tip pen. Measurements were taken directly from the tracings. The cross-sections of sciatic, peroneal and 180 tibial nerves were examined by use of light microscopy. A series of photographs were taken of each (magnification x 16, 50 and 25 for sciatic, peroneal and tibial cross-sections, respectively) and montages were made from the prints of each cross- section. Three fascicle types in each nerve, designated types 1, 2 and 3, were qualitatively identified. Fascicle type 1 contained large (”90%) and small (”10%) diameter myelinated axons. Fascicle type 2 had approximately equal percentages of the large and small diameter axons. Fascicle type 3 contained large (‘10%) and small (”90%) diameter myelinated axons. Measurements were taken, from each randomly selected fascicle type, directly from the microscope slide . The minimum diameter was chosen as the best estimate of axonal diameter (14,23). All measurements were taken using a Joyce/Loebl Magiscan 2a image analyzer. Frequency histograms were plotted using the Joyce/Loebl or the Asyst graphics programs. E. STATISTICAL METHOD The individual data points were subjected to the transformation, Zi =(xi_;_2_), where Xi is the 8x observed value, 8 the sample mean and Sx the standard deviation. This results in an approximately normal distribution for the random variable. The Chi-square test (goodness of fit to the normal) was not 181 statistically significant (probability > 0.10) for the transformed values. From this observation, it was concluded that parametric statistical procedures could be validly applied to the transformed values of the data collected. The linear mathematical model appropriate for describing the inherent variation in the data collected is: Yijklm = u [Population mean] + Gi + Nj + Hk + F1 [Main Effects] + GNij + GHik + GFll + Nij +.NF31 + HFkl [Two-way Interaction + GNHijk + GNFigl + NHFIkl [Th ee-way nteraction] + GNHFijkl [Four-Way Interaction] + eijklm [Random Error] The population mean is represented by u. The main effect comparisons are represented by: G1, the two genotypes (control and affected); N3, the three kinds of peripheral nerve (sciatic, tibial and peroneal); Hk, the two possible locations of each nerve (right and left) and F1, the classification of fascicles into three categories (types 1,2 and 3). The other components include the two-, three- and four-way interactions and eijklmr the random error associated with each observation where the number of replications (each measurement) recorded equals m. 182 The number of replications in each subgroup is unequal. This is the standard linear mathematical model for the representation of a factorial arrangement of four variables and all their interactons. The three- and four-way interactions generally cannot be interpreted biologically, therefore, the analysis of the inherent variability in the data calls for unjustifiably complex calculations. It is apparent, however, that a number of justifiable and reasonable asumptions can be made to simplify the initial model for the calculations. The assumptions include: (a) The primary objective(s) of the study is to determine if differences in myelinated axon diameter are associated with the variables (treatments), genotypes and peripheral nerve. Statistically significant differences detected between the genotypes can appropriately be attributed to the gene(s) that differ between the groups. Similarly, statistically significant differences detected between the kinds of peripheral nerve are attributable to several factors including their histology, physiology, biochemistry, neurochemistry and neurophysiology. It is unquestionably well documented that genetic and/or neurophysiological- neuropathological factors can explain differences 183 associated with any of these two treatments. (b) The difference associated with the two main effects, H and F and the two-, three- and four-way interactions in which they are involved, have no biological, pathological and biochemical basis relevant to the objectives of the current experiment. It is expected, for example, that the mean axon diameter, of each peripheral nerve, will not differ significantly between right and left of the animal. If sampling, however, resulted in a true difference, this model allows for its detection. In addition, the sum of squares attributable to the difference is substracted form the error sum of squares and this allows an unbiased and more sensitive test of the hypotheses. (c) Each combination of the two variables, H x F (2 x 3), represents a uniform or homogeneous experimental location (Block). If, for example, all samples were taken at the same location and all fascicle types were identical then there would be a single homogeneous experimental unit or block. The comparison within any of the treatments would, therefore, be affected only by treatment differences and the random error. Since this is not the case, it is possible to use the two controlled variables, location and fascicle type, to subdivide the experimental conditions into six distinguishable 184 homogeneous units or blocks. Additionally, the model allows for the removal of the sum of squares due to heterogeneity between the blocks.The appropriate linear mathematical model for the data collected, with the assumptions, is now: Yijkm = u [Population Mean] + Gi + Nj + Bk [Main-Effects] + GNij + GBik + NBjk [Two-way Interaction] . + GNBijk ‘ [Three-way Interaction] I + eijkm [Random Error] The new component, B, represents blocks. There are six blocks derived from two locations (right and left) times three fascicle categories (types 1, 2 and 3). 1. Experimental Design The appropriate design is a "factorial arrangement of treatments in a randomized complete block". The rationale, development and analyses of these designs are well documented (45-49). The layout is now conveniently presented in a 6 x 6 matrix (Table 4-1). This is not just a two-way analysis of variance, it is a 2 x 3 x 2 x 3 (genotype x peripheral nerve x location x fascicle) factorial arrangement. However, in this design 2 x 3 (location x fascicle) represents blocks and 2 x 3 (genotype 185 TABLE 4-1. EXPERIMENTAL LAYOUT B L O C K 8 Location Left Right Fascicle Types Treatments 1 2 3 1 2 Sciatic Control Sciatic Affected Tibial Control Tibial Affected Peroneal Control Peroneal Affected 186 x peripheral nerve) represents treatments. This factorial arrangement of treatments can also be presented as a 22 x 32 design. 2. Analysis of the Data (Computation of the Sum of Squares) a. Assign the weighted group means (ni) to their appropriate location in the 6 x 6 matrix (Table 4-2). Sum the rows and columns. b. Assign the row totals to their appropriate location in the 2 x 3 matrix (Table 4-3). Sum the rows and columns. c. Calculate the corresponding corrected sums of squares (Table 4-4) and arrange in the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) format. Hypotheses to be Tested a. The mean axon diameter is the same for control and affected goats. b. The mean axon diameter is the same for all three kinds of peripheral nerve (sciatic, peroneal and tibial). c. The difference between the mean axon diameter for control and affected goats is uniform across all three kinds of peripheral nerves. Alternatively, the hypothesis is that any difference between the mean axon diameter for the three kinds of peripheral 187 8.86.8 8.8....” 8.68... 8.88.» 8.48; 888... 8...8... .5... 5.38 8.33.4 8.68 8.86 8.8.. 8.86 8.8.. 8.98 8.835.. 38:83 3.86..” 8.3.. 8.8... 8.8.. 8.3.. 2.88 8.8.. 88.50 88.63 882.... 8.96 8.48 8.88 8.8.. 8.8.. 8.68.. 8.5684 333... 838.6 3.8.. 3.83.. 888.. 848 8.88 8.8.”; 8.850 333... 3.8»... oo...om 8.8.. 3.38... 3.8... 8.2.6 868.3 68635. 6338 $38.6 3.8.. 3.86 8.88.3 8.8.. 8.8.. 8.86.3 85:8 0338 Em 39. n m H n 8 H . 85563... 808.. .358. .3: E 52 28! 5.5.8.. .81. 5.2... 188 H~.m~m.u vm.m~H.HH mm.mmm.aa sum casaoo oa.~mo.na ¢>.mHH.¢ mm.na>.v m¢.m~m.v nopomuu¢. vm.omm.ma m¢.pom.m am.aav.o om.amn.m Honucuo sum sum Hmocaumm Hmfinaa owuwfiom mmmuocwo Maguaamgsmumuuawm .mgsapa e51.“nmuaasnu.nug..saa..uunnwnas.=aaaaaamu .mu¢ mumznr 189 £95m «0 sum mam: u zn g «0 5m «@3956 H Um 3m.m8 mm 2 x w m zxou $mu+mm£ ummzum mmmfimo nmm z a cannon 85.8.8 8+8; 8+8; 238 @268 «mm w H Bug 8+8; 8:38 msom 88.88; mm 3m m 698% owo.¢mm.wfi ¢>h.mm¢.ea omo.mmm.- em~.~HH.Hv moa.mm~.mm who.nam.m¢ mznm mm 88.8.3.8 55.8 m “Mum—6m 8863.8 8n.~R.8 3543.8 3938.8 3.3.8.8 moikndm £2.38 8:8; mm 3.8. mm 8.18868 u .md d6 .ggggg .Y¢§ 190 nerve is uniform between the genotypes. Statistically, this means there is no interaction between genotype and peripheral nerve. 4. Test of Significance The appropriate statistic to test the hypotheses is the F test. The F values and their degrees of freedom are respectively for: Hypothesis a: MS (Mean Square) for Genotype/Error MS = F(1’25) Hypothesis b: MS for Peripheral Nerve/Error MS - F(2.25) Hypothesis c: MS Interaction/Error M8 = F(2'25) The F value is a statistic determined by the ratio of two variances (mean squares) each with a unique degree of freedom. The F is a statistic with a probability value determined by the two degrees of freedom associated with each variance (mean square). VII. 191 RESULES AND DISCUSSION A. SCIATIC NERVE In order to determine if the axon diameters differed between the right and left sciatic nerves from each genotype, the confidence intervals (95%) were computed for the means of fascicle types 1, 2 and 3 (Tables 4-5 and 4-6). For right and left sciatic nerves, the confidence intervals for all fascicle types overlapped. Therefore, for each genotype, the mean axon diameters from the right and left sciatic nerve are not significantly different. Statistically it is appropriate to pool the values for right and left sciatic nerve for each genotype to estimate the mean axon diameters for fascicle types 1, 2 and 3. The pooled values are presented in Table 4-7. The only statistically significant difference in the mean axon diameters is for fascicle type 1, of control and affected, where the confidence intervals (95%) failed to overlap. In the affected, there is a decrease (10%) in mean axon diameter in fascicle type 1. The histogram of axon diameters of sciatic nerve type 1 fascicles for control and affected is presented in Figure 4-1. The distribution has a distinct and describable pattern. There are equal percentages, forcontrol and affected animals, of 192 ~§\m..oH x msoxo mo .39520 E gfimfia NmmU 833.3 £23m“. gguoggwggcg mufim magma omm . m nmw . H mom . o 25 . m mom . H mom . o $.3me mH...H mmn.~ mam... woman ...no.~ mm~.m Imwmé IH¢H.~ Ibmvé Imooé I..Hm.m $8.4 UHU wmm eo...o omaé H88 mm...o hmvé nm~.~ om shod mood road mnoé mbod @310 Hmmoé H.b~.~ fluke... Hmmpé “rain Humofi nanmm H mm M.M.. mmm wmm one mbm .bm a: on? m m H m m H 338». E HUHK BE .5 NE Ag 95:2!“ fl 3 Eogsggzfiig .még 193 ~§.\~10H x 9.98 no 3520 Hg ~98ng «map 83330 can; :88 on» no Hound pawn—Bum H “woman? 99% cum—E oNHm 298mm new . a H...” . H 00H .0 «we . m m: . H «mm . 0 {cannon 00...H 80.8 «00.0 304 02.8 «no... I000.H I288 memo... Inové I308 I086 18 wmm ..n...0 ~34 0004 005.0 NRA one; om 03.0 80.0 ..0H.0 30.0 30.0 000.0 H0004 Hn0¢.~ H08... Hmhmé H088 H034 ofimm H m 0mm 3.8 Rm 000 now Eh a: oaks m m H n m H 3388 E EH 5353 .5 E E QHOIEIfi d g E CHE b0 (.22: .2. g E E .64. a 194 H5000 .00 3H§0§§000 00 3Hg0 mm 00080930 EH 09.800.00.80 0000 8.3330 2002300 gmfimouggHgmggchf 000.0 398.00 woflnm 0.0 0.0 0.0 0000000 000.0 000.0 000.0 000.0 000.0 000.0 000.0 000.0 [000.0 000.0 -0004 -0000 000000 000.0 000.0 000.0 000.0 000.0 000.0 00 000.0 000.0 000.0 08.0 000.0 000.0 H0004 H0004 020.0 H0000 H0000 H0004 050 H m 000 000 000 000 000 000 0: 00000000. .0200000 00000000. .0200000 00000000. .0200000 00000000 n N H Egg .gggalvggog EagfiggggghOE-E .h.¢§ 195 FIGURE 4-1. DISTRIBUTION OF THE MEAN AXON DIAHETERS FOR SCIATIC NERVE TYPE 1 FASCICLES FROH A 4-DAY- OLD CONTROL AND AFFECTED GOAT. AFFECTED 47' ' CONTROL _ 196 25 l l 1 0 l0 0 N (%)Xouengau Axon Diameter(um) 197 small diameter axons (< 3.2 pm). The affected animal has a larger percentage of intermediate diameter size axons (4.2-6.02 um) while the control has a much higher percentage of large diameter axons (> 6.9 pm). The significance of this pattern is unclear. The values of the density ratios are presented in Table 4-7. In fascicle type 1, there is an increase (10%) in density for the affected animal. In fascicle types 2 and 3, there is a decrease (20%) in densities for the affected animal. The biological significance of this pattern is unclear. B. PERONEAL NERVE In each genotype, the pattern of mean axon diameter differences, between the right and left peroneal nerve of each fascicle type, is similar to that of sciatic nerve (Tables 4-8 and 4-9). The confidence intervals overlap between right and left peroneal nerve for each fascicle type except for types 1 and 3 in the affected animal. The means of the pooled axon diameters for control and affected goats are shown in Table 4-10. Fascicle types 2 and 3, of the control and affected goats, are each statistically different as evidenced by the non- overlapping confidence intervals. In the affected animal, there is a decrease (13% and 10%) in the mean axon diameters of fascicle types 2 and 3, 198 0000\0I00 00 0:98 00 009520 E 8:003:00 0000 533200 008.30%v :09: 05 00 00.000 0000:50H 0.30.0000 :98 .0095 00H...“ 398mm 000.0 000.0 000.4 000.0 400.0 000.0 00000000 000.4 000.0 000.0 000.0 000.0 000.0 :000.0 -004.0 .000.0 :400.0 .000.0 .000.0 .000 000. 000.0 000.0 000.4 000.0 000.0 000.0 00 000.0 000.0 000.0 000.0 000.0 000.0 H0004 H0000 H0004 H0004 H0000 H0004 £000 H m 000 000 000 000 000 000 0: «ma. 0 0 H m 0 4 00000000 00000 000000 .nzuauon .nggggl0‘g 199 0.030100 00 9.900 00 008506 003005 0080000050 0000 80000200 000000000 00000 0000 00 00000 00000090 0 03000000 0.900 500.5 0000 00900.00 000.0 000.0 000.0 000.0 000.0 000.0 0.0000000 000.0 000.0 000.0 000.0 000.0 000.0 000.0 ..000.0 400.0 -0000 000.0 000.0 000 000 000.0 000.0 000.0 000.0 000.0 2.0.0 00 000.0 00.0.0 000.0 000.0 000.0 000.0 0000.0 0000.0 H000.0 0000.0 H000.0 H000.0 00000 H m 000 000 000 000 000 000 0: 09¢. 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000 .0000 .0500 50.0.63 agggglfidg 200 35:00 no fiwgguum no ~33:me mm 6898:“wa agar: mop—03980 wmmc 833363ng gguouggflggcmflf 3am 395mm 003mm 3. m5 NA 53:8 mmhé owmé mNN.N owm.m Nmm.n v2.6 Iamw..n Iwmw.H Immo.m Iwmn..m Ime.n Ifimm.m UHmem mmmé momd mad...” mantn mama" com...” um .305 $55 35.0 .305 $8.0 mmod finds...“ Hvomé “NMH.N Hmmv.m an¢.m vam.n nunwm H mm mmm Hmv vmm va ¢Nm mmv m: @0000“: HOHEOU 8&8“: HOHEQU EDEN: H550 $93.98 n N H E.H. ”Hug ogggath—Eg gaggsggggsggocdovg 201 respectively. The histograms of the mean axon diameters of peroneal nerve fascicle types 2 and 3 for control and affected are presented in Figures 4-2 and 4-3, respectively. The affected animal has a higher percentage of the small diameter axons (< 1.0 pm) in fascicle types 2 and 3. The control animal has a higher percentage of the intermediate (1.4-3.0 um) and large (> 3.7 pm) axon diameters in fascicles types 2 and 3, respectively. These patterns have no documented biological significance. The values for the density ratios are shown in Table 4-10. In fascicle type 1, there is a increase (20%) in the density for the affected animal. There is a decrease (10% and 20%) of the densities in fascicle types 2 and 3, respectively for the affected goat. The significance of this pattern is unclear. C. TIBIAL NERVE In each genotype, the pattern for the mean axon diameter differences, between right and left tibial nerve of each fascicle type, is similar to that observed for both sciatic and peroneal nerve (Tables 4-11 and 4-12). The confidence intervals overlap between right and left, for each fascicle type, except for type 1 from the control. The means of the pooled axon diameters for tibial nerve, from control and affected goats, are presented in Table 4-13. 202 FIGURE 4-2. DISTRIBUTION OF THE MEAN AXON DIAMETERS FOR PERONEAL NERVE TYPE 2 FASCICLES FROM A 4-DAY- OLD CONTROL AND AFFECTED GOAT. T a AFFECTED 47' CONTROL _ 203 40 1 O m l O O (%)Kouanbal :1 7.7 5.0 5.7 6.3 7.0 Axon Diameter(um) FIGURE 4-3. 204 DISTRIBUTION OF THE MEAN AXON DIANETERS FOR PERONEAL NERVE TYPE 3 FASCICLES FROH A 4-DAY- OLD CONTROL AND AFFECTED GOAT. AFFECTED flfiflfi CONTROL _ 205 35 l L l J I!) 0 LO Q (\l (\l '— "' (%)Aouenbel=| Axon Diameter(um) 206 ~21\m...oa x 898 no Hon—52w Hmpamucfl mocmuamcao wmmc :ofiuma>mu_cnmu:mumo gflflmoggmwggsmozn «Nam 398mm mna.~ -o.a oe>.o mmm.~ mum.H Hoo.H msufimcmo nmo.~ mo¢.~ 39¢ moo.~ wvmé nmoé Iceman |~n~.~ Imnvé $34 |8~.~ Immbé UHU wmm nmaé owaé mmn.~ mend 8~.N .304 om mmoé $0.0 mmad mnoé owed ~86 Hflwmé “Down ”7.354 Hummé Hwoc.m “mood nwamm H m Hmv mmm mmm mum wow now a: R.E. m N H m N H 33093 E B.UHM ZOE .Egggglcflg Egg 1.21: 5: SEE .Hdov g 207 ms:\NIoH x mcoxo mo nonepzu Hm>umucH mocmowucoo «moo cOHuMH>mo_chocoumo cums may no sound camosmuw H anMEMHUicoxo :mmzn mNHm oHnammo on: 3.; ~36 mmmé an»; as; wfifimfio Hob.H th.~ bno.e omh.H mmo.~ Hnm.m Imw¢.H IHhmH IHOh.n IOBH Iahwé Ibmmé UHU wmm mon.H mom.o «Hm.H wmb.o mNo.H eow.H om 3.90 ~mo.o «mod 03.0 mmoé HOH.o Hmmwé Hm~b.~ Hmwmé HommH HammH HmNh.N E H... m mam own mmm 0mm 35 omm m: mama n N H m N H mHUHOmNm E SE 6% .Eg a E QHOIEIfi d E E E MO 2.2.9 .2. g E an. .Ndov a 208 Fascicle types 1, 2 and 3, of control and affected, are each statistically different as evidenced by the non-overlapping confidence intervals. In the affected animal, there is a decrease (11%, 15% and 16%) in the mean axon diameters for fascicle types 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The histograms of the mean axon diameters of fascicles types 1, 2 and 3 are shown in Figures 4-4, 4-5 and 4-6, respectively. The affected animal has an increased percentage of the small (< 1.4 pm) and intermediate (2.3-6.0 pm) and a decreased percentage of the large (> 6.9 pm) axon diameters in fascicle type 1. The affected goat has an increased percentage of the small (< 1.1 pm) and a decreased percentage of the large (> 4.1 pm) axon diameters in fascicle type 2. In fascicle type 3, the affected has an increased percentage of the small (< 0.8 pm) and a decreased percentage of the intermediate (1.3- 2.8 pm) axon diameters. The significance of these patterns have no documented biological explanation. The values for the density ratios are presented in Table 4-13. In both fascicle types 2 and 3, of the affected animal, there is a decrease (20%) in density. D. CRANIAL NERVES V AND VIII Data collected did not permit an unbiased 209 HoHEoo no 33.303830 «0 33:00 no 039333 Hugh 8:0ng womb , 53350; ggmouggwgggcmflf 83.. 35 mowumm as To . oé 33:8 h.VNH...H mN0.N 00H.N mweN mnmé 0004 [www.H Immm.H Iwmm.H IomN.N Imhw.m 1000.0 UHmem N34 000.0 500.0 ¢NN.H emmé mmoN Om 03.0 mn0.0 mm0.0 000.0 m00.0 2.0.0 H¢¢0.H Hmmmé HNmoN HammN H0005 waNé nfiwm H m 2.0 max. #00 man. mum 000 m: @3834 3380 88“.? 35.80 8833 H8 8398 n N H g ”Hug oggggl¢gfl>~nmz§ sagas (.272 .2. EEEBEE J.H.VE FIGURE 4-4. 210 DISTRIBUTION OF THE MEAN AXON DIANETERS FOR TIBIAL NERVE TYPE 1 FASCICLES FROM A 4-DAY- OLD CONTROL AND AFFECTED GOAT. 211 AesrfimeE :83 09 Mo mm 3. \k 0.0 0.0 .\ . on. 2 mm mm \ v; m0 $2 mMouanbaJd O N §§§$ owhomum< I JOmhzOO LO N 212 FIGURE 4-5. DISTRIBUTION OF THE MEAN AXON DIANETERS FOR TIBIAL NERVE TYPE 2 FASCICLES FROM A 4-DAY- OLD CONTROL AND AFFECTED GOAT. 213 EnroEEmE :82. mm on 3 3 mm mm 3 8 3 ma m. \oq 8 <2 mMouanbeH O CO 0 V § I 85mm“? .5528 O to -\! FIGURE 4-6. 214 DISTRIBUTION OF THE MEAN AXON DIAMETERS FOR TIBIAL NERVE TYPE 3 FASCICLES FROM A 4-DAY- OLD CONTROL AND AFFECTED GOAT. AFFECTED flflflfi CONTROL - 215 .\\ §\\\\i\§\\§\i\i\\x\\\\\\a\\i v. .\\\V 1.0 0.2 0.6 l l l i 1 m o Lo 0 Ln 0 N N ‘- - mMouanbaJd Axon Diameter(um) 216 comparison between control and affected goats because they were not age- and sex-matched. E. THE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA) The results of the ANOVA are summarized in Table 4-14. The F value associated with the effect, genotype, has a probability less than 0.005. This is evidence that the mean myelinated axon diameter is significantly decreased in the fi-mannosidosis goat. The P value for the effect, nerve, has a probability less than 0.001. It was expected that the mean axon diameter would not be equal in all three types of peripheral nerve. In the data, the mean axon diameter of peroneal nerve was significantly lower than the values for both sciatic and tibial nerves. The F value for the interaction MS has a probability less than 0.025. This significant interaction between genotype and nerve is attributable to the observation that the mean axon diameter, for sciatic and tibial nerves, is larger for the control than for the affected goat. However, the mean axon diameter, for peroneal nerve, is smaller for the control than for the affected. This study presents a method to detect, by a statistical comparison of myelinated axon diameter, differences in the peripheral nerves of goats with fi-mannosidosis. The statistical analysis of the 217 mm0.0V H00.0v m00.0v an: an? 0m.m ¢M.¢H NH.MH vm.0H mm.HN H00.NN mms.¢~a swa.m~m m~¢.oon mm~.H¢~ ¢e¢.ome m2 msn.oo~.¢ ms~.~sm 0am.m¢m mnn.omo m~e.oon ms~.mo~.H v-.~mv.~ mm mm .M.U HOE Acaauomumoch gum—axon? AQQQEHQNHBV mznm .mxuoamv casaoo .mSDZE.m=B.&uMflflaafiflw . 17v THQNH. 218 morphometric data collected is complicated by the inherent variability, the heterogeneity of the three fascicles types and the skewed and/or bimodal distribution of the axon diameters. In order to conduct the tests of significance, however, the individual data points were transformed to yield an approximate Gaussian distribution (p > 0.10 for the Chi-square goodness of fit). The data provides preliminary evidence that B- mannosidosis in goats is associated with a statistically significant (p < 0.005) reduction in the mean myelinated axon diameter for the peripheral nerves analysed. The pathogenesis of this observation is unknown. Factors involved could include changes in axonal-Schwann cell communication and/or axonal growth possibly related to metabolic perturbations in anterior horn and/or Schwann cells. The cytoplasm of these cell types is extensively vacuolated in fi-mannosidosis. The presence of significant heterogeneity between the axon diameters of sciatic, tibial and peroneal nerves and the occurrence of subpopulations of fascicles types, in each nerve, were characteristic of both the control and affected goat. It is important to remember that all the measurements from control and affected nerves were 219 taken on only one animal in each group. This introduces both a bias and confounding. The statistically significant difference attributable to genotype in this study, for example, is also due to the effect of animal-to-animal variation. The interpretation and eXtrapolation of the data, therefore, must be done with caution. With the appropriate data (e.g., sample size of each genotype > 5), however, this model will detect statistically significant differences between axonal diameter in peripheral nerves from goats affected with 3- mannosidosis and their age- and sex-matched controls. The model presented is particularly effective in conducting the test of significance when the inherent variability in the data is complex and extensive. LIST OF REFERENCES 10. VII. LIST OF REFERENCES Dyck, P.J. (1984) in Peripheral Neuropathy (Dyck, P.J., Thomas, P.K., Lambert, E.H. and Bunge, R., eds) pp. 2-42, W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia. Ochs, S. (1984) in Peripheral Neuropathy (Dyck, P.J., Thomas, P.K., Lambert, E.H. and Bunge, R., eds) pp. 453-476, W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia. Brimijoin, S. (1984) in Peripheral Neuropathy (Dyck, P.J., Thomas, P.K., Lambert, E.H. and Bunge, R., eds) pp. 477-493, W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia. Holland, S.R. (1982) J. Anat. 115, 183-190. Aguayo, A.J. and Bray, G.M. (1984) in Peripheral Neuropathy (Dyck, P.J., Thomas, P.K., Lambert, E.H. and Bunge, R., eds) pp. 360-376, W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia. Weinberg, H.J. and Spencer, P.S. (1976) Brain Res. 11;, 363-378. Bunge, R.P. (1981) TINS July, 175-177. Bardosi, A., Friede, R.L., Ropte, S. and Goeble, R.H. (1987) Brain 119, 683-694. Lake, E.D. (1984) in Greenfield's Neuropathology (Adams, J.H., Corsellis, J.A.N. and Duchen, L.W., eds) pp. 491-572, John Wiley & Sons, New York. Aguayo, A., Bray, G., Perkins, S. and Duncan, I. (1980) in Neurological Mutations Affecting Myelination (Baumann, N., ed) pp. 87-98, Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, New York. 220 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 221 Thomas, P.K., Landon, D.N. and King, R.H.M. in Greenfield's Neuropathology (Adams, J.H., Corsellis, J.A.N. and Duchen, L.W., eds) pp. 807- 920, John Wiley 8 Sons, New York. Raine, C.B. and Schaumberg, R.H. (1977) in Myelin (Morell, P., ed) pp. 271-308, Plenum Press, New York. Duchen, L.W. in Greenfield's Neuropathology (Adams, J.H., Corsellis, J.A.N. and Duchen, L.W., eds) pp. 1-52, John Wiley & Sons, New York. Dyck, P.J., Karnes, J., Lais, A., Lofgren, E.P. and Stevens, J.C. (1984) in Peripheral Neuropathy (Dyck, P.J., Thomas, P.K., Lambert, E.H. and Bunge, R., eds) pp. 760-870, W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia. ‘ Natarajan, V. and Schmid, R.H.O. (1984) in Peripheral Neuropathy (Dyck, P.J., Thomas, P.K., Lambert, E.H. and Bunge, R., eds) pp. 531-561, W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia. Poduslo, J.F. (1984) in Peripheral Neuropathy (Dyck, P.J., Thomas, P.K., Lambert, E.H. and Bunge, R., eds) pp. 494-509, W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia. Hauw, J.-J. and Escourolle, R. (1980) in Neurological Mutations Affecting Myelination (Baumann, N., ed) pp. 47-68, Plenum Press, New York. Bunge, R.P., Bunge, M.B., Okada, E. and Cornbrooks, C.J. (1980) in Neurological Mutations Affecting Myelination (Baumann, N., ed) pp. 433- 446, Plenum Press, New York. Brady, R.G. (1984) in Peripheral Neuropathy (Dyck, P.J., Thomas, P.K., Lambert, E.H. and Bunge, R., eds) pp. 1717-1727, W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia. ' Thomas, P.K. (1984) in Peripheral Neuropathy (Dyck, P.J., Thomas, P.K., Lambert, E.H. and Bunge, R., eds) pp. 1745-1772, W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia. Lovell, K.L. and Boyer, P.J. (1987) Int. J. Devl. Neuroscience 5, 243-253. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 3o. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 222 Pesce, G.M. (1987) Lab. Invest. 56, 568-575. Thomas, P.K. and Ochoa, J. (1984) in Peripheral Neuropathy (Dyck, P.J., Thomas, P.K., Lambert, E.H. and Bunge, R., eds) pp. 39-96, W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia. Dyck, P.J., Jedrzejowska, H., Kaines, J., Kawamura, Y., Low, P.A., O'Brien, P.C., Offord, K., Ohnishi, A., Ohta, M., Pollock, M. and Stevens, J.C. (1979) 2, 399-405. Bradley, W.S., Good, P., Rasool, C.G. and Adelman, L.S. (1983) Ann. Neurol. 14, 267-277. Friede, R.L. and Beuche, W. (1985) J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 11, 60-72. Usson, Y., Torch, S. and d'Aubigny, G.D. (1987) J. Neurosci. Meth. 20, 237-248. Ouvrier, R.A., McLeod, J.G. and Conchin, T. (1937) 19, 47-53. Zimmerman, I.R., Karnes, J.L., O'Brien, P.C. and Dyck, P.J. (1980) J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 3g, 409-419. Arbuthnott, E.R;, Boyd, I.A. and Kalu, K.U. (1980) J. Physiol. 398, 125-157. Arbuthnott, E.P., Ballard, K.J., Boyd, I.A. and Kalu, K.U. (1980) J. Physiol. 108, 99-123. Friede, R.L. (1986) Exp. Neurol. g2, 234-247. Goebel, M.M., Bardosi, A., Friede, R.L., Kohlschutter, A., Albani, M. and Siemes, H. (1986) Muscle Nerve 2, 165-173. Sima, A.A.F. and Robertson, D.M. (1978) Arch. Neurol. g5, 291-301. Pellissier, J.F., Van Hoof, F., Bourdet- Bonerandi, D., Monier-Faugere, M.C. and Toga, M. (1981) Muscle Nerve 4, 381-387. Jacobs, J.M., Scaravilli, F. and DeAranda, F.T. (1982) J. Neurol. Sci. 3, 285-304. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 223 Abe, T., Ogawa, K., Kuziwara, H., Urayama, K. and Nagashima, K. (1985) Acta Neuropathol. fig, 239- 2440 ' Landrieu, P. and Said, G. (1984) Acta Neuropathol. 91, 66-71. Beaudet, A.L. (1983) in The Metabolic Basis of Inherited Disease (Stanbury, J.B., Wyngaarden, J.B., Fredrickson, D.S., Goldstein, J.L. and Brown, M.S., eds) pp. 788-802, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York. Jones, M.Z., Cunningham, J.G., Dade, A.W., Alessi, D.M., Mostosky, U.V., Vorro, J.R., Benitez, J.T. and Lovell, K.L. (1983) J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 52, 268-285. Lovell, K.L. and Jones, M.Z. (1983) Acta Neuropathol (Berl) g2, 121-126. Lovell, K.L. and Jones, M.Z. (1985) Acta Neuropathol (Berl) §§, 293-299. Malachowski, J.A. and Jones, M.Z. (1983) Acta Neuropathol (Berl) g1, 95-100. Cavanagh, K., Dunstan, R.W. and Jones, M.Z. (1982) Am. J. Vet. Res. 1;, 1058-1059. Fisher, R.A. (1945) The Design of Experiments, 5th ed., Oliver and Boyd, London. Yates, F. (1935) Complex Experiments, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Suppl. 2. Federer, W.T. (1955) Experimental Design, The Macmillian Company, New York. Cochran, W.S. and Cox. G.M. (1957) Experimental Designs 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, F.J. (1981) Biometry 2nd ed., W.B. Freeman and Company, San Francisco. ‘II II! ll'l...|:|. I. III 'll | VII.