L91" Q‘An A—v. vv' ”xx: u... ml.“ v nun; I n ,m'. -:n .‘o .v p ‘v. 3““: . .r‘ ;,;.f.:-. . . .- «s; . a w . "'15. 5‘ ‘. ‘5 31%;; u 3': . 1x1. “ . M ““31 .1135.‘ .33 :_‘~9‘;§A;S§:$}: A" . 1%:2“ "' - fiawsma "s yes-gums. ‘r-zl‘": mm L; an- agar: n'w' "w a" 3‘ a. - :«N‘r‘ 9‘. ' w.,..—,>,-.~m;:,~. "urn:- ’ ‘- "Efififi ‘* may g A v ‘ ”xii" "1 . - 4, I agfi; V. “L :33” ‘ - .§”h“;‘j"‘5‘3‘sfiy~fisg'~-w, fl. ~‘ ~ - . . ‘WV‘: 7" _ 313% 30 .~ 2‘3“} a “1;“ ‘2‘: ‘7‘; 1%“ ‘ it‘l‘ ‘ 1 9. _ 55-2» _ V q, t c, .' _ ‘E I. ‘ b "5 ’ _ ‘rrI-nargéq' . u 1.; r i . 4- 6 W: . I: , . - - r“—I’=«:£r.,, negr-‘f' ,214.’ H. 354‘ #35335; . " 35$}. J)! M14. 3&2; w. ' ' .2 :.r v- y n ~ " 1‘4 l a» :gisnmnzir, :~ . , .m". I87 *fl‘ -. _ 3...“.4'.L3..' "’ m. ’ «4,. ”wary; .33; ‘ . Fm 14'.‘£"!‘.';..;,.’ ‘ » '74-L.w .. "flaw’xratr‘ug ‘3‘ .- ”an, -- “N a- .... x. .132- . £52.1- ~" :3. n2: ' "5’5”:ng u m.‘."..',...ms N'WW-‘c— ~ . N u “.I ‘D' ' r. ’31 I. «3.9 L',‘é.' ” ‘ ‘I’é' r! ‘ 4"":"1fi’. !" g; _ I ' WOI‘Q-‘ . ‘7‘ "V"‘J:' “V. a 5". 4;) 38'" ' ..... 7155.4,- "- ' -‘ WY] -&-. ' ‘0' I o? W/o? 8574?; SITY Illillll'illlfili‘llllrtlrlllflmll‘lll 3 1293 00786 4931 LIBRARY Michigan State University l K _r This is to certify that the dissertation entitled Pillaring of Layered Double Hydroxide with Polyoxometalates presented by Taehyun Kwon has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for Ph . D degree in Chemistry / WM 7 Manama; M ajo ofessor Date September 22, 1988 MSU is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Institution 0-12771 PLACE IN RETURN BOX to remove this checkout from your record. TO AVOID FINES return on or before due due. DATE DUE DATE DUE DATE DUE CE: I IZZY—fl L_]l::ll__ I! EC? . usu Is An Aflirmdive Action/Equal Opportunity Institution cumulus-e: PILLARING OF LAYERED DOUBLE HYDROXIDE WITH POLYOXOMETALATES By TAEHYUN KWON A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partiaL fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Chemistry 1988 6, ABSTRACT PILLARING OF LAYERED DOUBLE HYDROXIDE WITH POLYOXOMETALATES Taehygg Kwon Pure Zn/Al layered double hydroxides (LDHS) of the type Zn2Al(OH)6-A, where A = C1-, N03“, have been prepared by an induced hydrolysis method. Several polyoxometalates (POMS) have been intercalated in the Zn/Al LDH gallery by controlled ion-exchange reactions to form new classes of two-dimensional microporous solids. The following POMS have been successfully intercalated to yield pure phases as the sole reaction products : H2W120406-, a-SiV3W9O407', PM02W9O397‘, BV(IV)W1104o7-. BCo(II)W110397-. BCu(II)W1 10397-. SiFe(III)(SO3)W110397-. SiW110393-. BW110399-. PW9O349-. PV140429-. H2W1204210-. NaP5W30011014‘. The following POMS undergo partial exchange and yield incompletely exchanged reaction products : PCu(II)W110395-, BV(V)W110406', BCo(III)W110396-, PV3W9O4o6-, Bl-SiW110398', [32-SiW110398', B- SiV3W9O407-. The intercalation reaction exhibits novel ion exchange selectivities. A complete exchange reaction takes place only under acidic reaction conditions. The a isomer of Keggin-type POM (eg. a-SiV3W9O40 ') is more favorably intercalated than other stereo isomers. Such favorable ion exchange behavior for a-Keggin POM can be explained in terms of the commensurate relationship of oxygen layers in the POM and the LDH hydroxyl lattice. The rhombohedral stacking pattern of the hydroxyl layer, which is more thermodynamically favorable than the hexagonal stacking polytype, is retained when the a-isomer is intercalated. The minimum charge carried by the Keggin- type POM for complete exchange is observed to be 6-. The POMs intercalated in LDH galleries are hydrolytically more stable than POM in the homogeneous solution. In the solid state, the POM-pillared LDH (LDH-POM) is generally stable up to about 200°C. An amorphous phase is formed around 300°C, and new crystalline inorganic phases are formed around 500°C. Fl‘IR studies indicate that the POMS in LDH galleries experience two major types of interactions : anion-anion repulsions and hydrogen bonding interaction with the LDH layer. These two competing interactions determine the direction of the v(M=O) band shift compared to normal potassium or ammonium salts. It has been observed that hydrogen bonding dominates, resulting in a red shift for the v(M=O) band. LDH-POMS have been found to swell in water, the extent of swelling ranging from one to two mono layers. Non-pillared LDH intercalate are not swell in water. LDH-POMS exhibit high surface areas, compared to a non-pillared LDH derivatives. This result indicates that extra space in the gallery has been introduced by pillars. The surface area of the LDH-POM depends on the charge of POM in the gallery. The highest surface area has been found for the Keggin-type POM with an 8- charge. The nonrigidity of the host layer could lead to low surface areas in the case of LDH-POMS in which the POMS carry higher charges than 8-. LDH-POMS are photochemically reacitve. They oxidize iso-propanol to acetone under irradiation by a Hg(Xe) lamp. The reactivity of the LDH-POM is different from that for POM in homogeneous solution. The higher the charge of POM in the gallery, the more space in the gallery, and the higher the photoreactivity of LDH-POM. The diffusivity of both the reactant and the products in the LDH gallery appears to determine the efficiency of the photoreaction. TO MY FAMILY ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Dr. T]. Pinnavaia for patience, encouragement, and guidance offered tluought the years of graduate school. I am also grateful to Dr. H.A. Eick for his editorial assistance in improving my writing. I would like to express my gratitude to all past and present group members with whom I have come in contact with. Finally, I would like to thank my parent and my wife for their financial support as well as encouragement. iii Chapter LIST OF TABLES CHAPTER I. A. B. CHAPTERII. F1905”? TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Pillaring of Lamellar Solids Layered Double Hydroxide (LDH) 1. Structure 2. Synthesis of LDH 3. Ion-exchange Property of LDHS 4. Comparison of LDH and Smectite Swelling Properties - 5. Thermal Stability of LDHS 6. Application of LDHS Polyoxometalate 1. Structure and Property of Polyoxometalate mm» 2. Charge Distribution of POMS 3. Photochemistry of POMS Adsorption onto Porous Materials Experimental Materials Preparation of LDH-Cl and LDH-N03 Preparation of Guest Anions POMS Synthesis of LDH-POMS Physical Measurements 1. X-ray Powder Diffraction 2. Gas Adsorption Measurement 3. Thermal Stability Study of LDH-POMS -..---------- 4. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Studies iv Page xii F. G. H. CHAPTER III. RESULT AND DISCUSSION A. F9371?“ H O Photocatalytic Reaction Elemental Analysis Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) ............ Synthesis of LDH-Cl, N03 Synthesis of LDH-POMS Characterization of LDH-POMS 1. Electron Microscope Studies 2. X-ray Powder Diffraction (XRD) Studies ----------- 3. Elemental Analysis 4. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Studies ------ 5. Infared Spectroscopy Study a) Vibrations of Host Layer b) Vibrations of Guest POM Anion ------------ c) Vibrations of LDH-POMS Selectivities of Ion-Exchange Reaction and Orientation of the Intercalated POMS 1. Charge Selectivity 2. Streo Selectivities 3. Orientation of POMS in the Gallery Thermal Stabilities of LDH-POMS Adsorption Study of LDH-POMS Theoretical Calculation of Surface Area Pore Volume Photoreactivity of LDH-POMS Swelling Properties of LDH-POMS PTOPOSCd Mechanism of Ion-Exchange Reactio ------ Appendix A: XRD pattern of LDH-N03 and LDH-POMS. ............ V 54 54 55 56 56 58 61 61 66 66 66 82 82 84 90 111 111 116 121 123 208 219 224 228 228 223 Appendix B: T-plots and DR or D-A plots of LDH-POMS. ---------- 242 References 251 vi Table 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 LIST OF TABLES Some Natural Minerals of the Pyroaurite—Sjogrenite --------- pH values for Synthesis by the Induced Hydrolysis Method Classification of 2:1 Minerals according to the Swelling in Water and the Exchangeable Cation (after Suquet)39 Swelling of [anCr(OH)6)][C12H25804‘-nH20] in n-Alcohol Thcnnal Stability of [M(II)1-xM(III)(OH)2][An-] ............ Heteropoly Tungstate and Molybdates with a-Keggin Structure Polarographic Half-Wave Potentials of Lacunary Tungstosilicate Anions Lacunary 1:11 and 2:17 Polyanion Ligands Heteroatoms and Terminal Ligands observed in (XM11)ZL and (X2M17)ZL Heteroatoms of Z(XM11)2 and Z(X2M17)2 Complexes ---- Elemental Analysis Data for LDH-POM Vibrational Frequency of X04 Infrared Spectral Data of Free-POMS and LDH-POMS LDH-POM Intercalates for N2 Adsorption Studies ----------- N2 Gas Adsorption Data and Calculated Values ------------- Photochemical Reactivities of LDH-POMS vii Page 13 13 14 19 23 26 28 29 69 86 91 217 223 226 Figure LIST OF FIGURES Page Layer sequence in pyroaurite and sjogrenite. The brucite-like layers are Shaded. 4 \O Basal Spacings(A) of Na-saturated bcidllite at different p/po-- Change of approximate mean spacing between layers of montrnorillonite with reciprocal of square root of concentration for N a-saturated clay (after Norrish). x in N aCl solutions, 0 in N a2804 solution. 11 Two types of M06 octahedra. a) Type I and b) Type ---------- 16 The five Baker-Figgis isomers of the Keggin structure (a). In [3-, 7-, 8, and e—structures one, two, three and four M3013 groups (shown unshaded) have been rotated by 1t/3. 17 a and [5 Structure of heteropolyanions of the 12-series -------- 20 Polyhedral models and relationships between the different known tungstosilicates. This scheme is based partly on structural determination by single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies and partly on proposed structures. Hydrolysis of the [3-8insz ‘ anion only gives B2-SiW110398‘ and, then, the y—SiW100368' anion. 21 Polyhedral representation of a) a-SiV3W9O407' and b) B—SiV3W90406'. 3o viii Figure 10 11 12 13 14 15 Page XRD pattern of LDH-Cl prepared at different pH. * represents a Zn5(OH)8C12 phase. 57 It spectrum of LDH-N03. 59 XRD pattern of LDH-NaP5W3oO110, prepared at pH = 7 .4.- 60 XRD pattern of a) LDH-SiFe(SO3)W11039 and b) LDH-PW9034. * represents an extra phase. 62 Transmission electron microscope picture of LDH-POMS.--- 64 (top, left), LDH-N03; (top, right), LDH-BCuW11039; (below, left), LDH-PM02W9039; (below, right), LDH-PW9034. Polyhedral representation of H2W1204210-. 65 (top, left), An ORTEP view of [NaP5W3001 10114» looking approximately along the virtual C5 symmetry axis. Oxygen and tungsten atoms are represented as large and small open circules, respecrively, and the sodium ion by the central closed circle. The phophorus atoms are shown as closed circles. (top, right), an idealized view along C5 axis showing the W06 octahedra in the upper half of the anion. (below), The PW6022 unit perpendicular to the anion’s virtual Cs axis. The phosphorus atom is represented by the closed circle. 68 ix Figure 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page Solution 51V NMR spectra for a) LDH-SiV3W904o at pH = 2.0 1.10104 solution and b) a-K6HSiV3W9O40 at pH = 1.7. 71 Solid state 295i MAS NMR for a) LDH-SiV3W904 and b) a-K6HSiV3W9O40. 72 Solid state 51v MAS NMR for LDH-SiV3W904o. ---------- 73 Solid State 31P MAS NMR for a) LDH-PM02W9039 and b) K7PM02W9O39. 75 Solid state 31p MAS NMR for a) LDH-PW9034 and b) NagHPW9034. 77 Solid state 31p MAS NMR for a) LDH-PV14042 and b) (NH4)9PV14O4. 78 Solid state 113 MAS NMR for a) LDH-BW11039 and b) KgBW11O39. 80 Solid state 23Na MAS NMR for a) LDH-NaP5W3oO110 and b) (NH4)14NaP5W300110. 81 Solid state 31? MAS NMR for a) LDH-NaP5W3oO110 and b)(NH4)14NaP5W300110. 83 Idealized Structure of or-XM12 (Keggin structure) (a) and a-XMll (defect Keggin structure) (b) (central X04tetrahedron is not Shown). (0a = oxygen shared by 3 M06 octahedra and X04 tetlahedron. Ob and 0c = oxygen linked to two different M atokms. 0d = terminal unshared oxygen.- 85 Figure 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 41 42 43 The polyhedral model of the PV140429' anion. Ir spectra of l) (NH4)6W12040 and 2) LDH-H2W12042.-- Ir spectra of l) K6BVW11040 and 2) LDH-BVW1104o.---- Ir spectra of 1) K6HSiV3W9040 and 2) LDH-SiV3W9040. Ir spectra of 1) K381W11039 and 2) LDH-SiW11039. ----- Ir spectra of 1) K7PM02W9039 and 2) LDH-PM02W9039. Ir spectra of l) K9BW11039 and 2) LDH-BW11039.------- Ir Spectra of 1) K7BCuW11039 and 2) LDH-BCuW11039. Ir spectra of 1) K7BCoW11O39 2) LDH-BCoW11039. ----- Ir spectra of 1) K7SiFe(SO3)W11039 and 2) LDH-SiFe(SO3)W1103. Ir spectra of 1) B-NagHPW9034 and 2) LDH-PW9034.--- Ir Spectra of 1) (NH4)3C02W12042 and 2) LDH-Con12042. Ir spectra of 1) (NH4)9PV 14042 and 2) LDH-PV14O42.--- Ir Specua of 1) (NH4)10H2W12042 2) LDH-H2W12042.-- Ir Spectra of 1) (NH4)14NaP5W300110 and 2) LDH-NaP5W3oO11. XRD pattern of LDH-PCuW11039. XRD pattern of a) LDH-BCo(III)W11039. b) LDH-BV(V)W11040 and C) LDH-PV3W9040.----------- XRD pattern of a) LDH-B1-SiW11039, b) IDH-BZ'SiW11039. c) LDH-B3-SiW11039, d) LDH-a-SiW11039, e) LDH-B—SiV3W9O4. xi Page 89 93 95 96 97 99 100 101 103 104 113 107 108 109 110 112 114 118 Figure 45 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 XRD pattern of LDH-H2W12040 at different temperatures.- a) 25°C, b) 120°C, c) 180°C: dotted line for the rehydrated sample, solid line for dehydrated sample, d) 225°C, e) 320°C, and 1) 470°C. Ir spectra of LDH-H2W1204o at different temperatures.---- DSC and TGA of IDH-H2W1204o. XRD pattern of LDH-SiV3W9040 at different temperatures. a) 25°C, b) 165°C, c) 220°C: dotted line for the rehydrated sample, solid line for the dehydrated sample, d) 250°C, e) 360°C, and f) 500°C. Ir Spectra of LDH-SiV3W9040 at different temperatures-«- DSC and TGA of LDH-SiV3W9O4o. 127 130 131 133 136 138 XRD pattern of LDH-BV(IV)W11039 at different temperatures.- 140 a) 25°C, b) 150°C, c) 225°C: dotted line for the rehydrated sample, solid line for the dehydrated sample, d) 255°C, e) 360°C, and 1) 470°C. Ir Spectra of LDH-BV(IV)W11040 at different temperatures. DSC and TGA of LDH-BV(IV)W11040. XRD pattern of LDH-BCo(II)W11039 at different temperatures. a) 25°C. b) 185°C: dotted line for the rehydrated sample, solid line for the dehydrated sample, c) 200°C: dotted line for the rehydrated sample, solid line for the dehydrated sample, d) 250°C, e) 360°C, and f) 500°C. Ir spectra of LDH-BCo(II)W11039 at different temperatures.- xii 143 144 146 149 Figure 55 56 57 58 59 61 62 63 65 DSC and TGA of LDH-BCo(H)W11039. XRD pattern of LDH-BCu(II)W11039 at different temperatures. a) 25°C, b) 125°C, c) 160°C, d) 190°C: dotted line for the rehydrated sample , solid line for the dehydrated sample, e) 230°C, and 0 500°C. Ir spectra of LDH-BCu(II)W11039 at different temperatures. DSC and TGA of LDH-BCu(II)W11039. XRD pattern of LDH-PM02W9039 at different temperatures. a) 25°C, b) 150°C, 0) 205°C: dotted line for the rehydrated sample, solid line for the dehydrated sample, d) 340°C, and e) 500°C. Ir spectra of LDH-PM02W9039 at different temperatures.--- DSC and TGA of LDH-PM02W9039. XRD pattern of LDH-SiFe(III)(SO3)W11039 at different temperatures. a) 25°C, b) 150°C, c) 185°C, d) 200°C: dotted line for the rehydrated sample, solid line for the dehydrated sample, C) 303°C, and 1) 500°C. Ir spectra of LDH-SiFe(SO3)W11039 at different temperatures. DSC and TGA of LDH-SiFe(SO3)W11039. XRD pattern of LDH-SiW11039 at different temperatures.- a) 25°C, b) 160°C. c) 180°C: dotted line for the rehydrated sample, solid line for the dehydrated sample, (1) 230°C, e) 300°C, and 1) 500°C. xiii Page 151 153 156 157 159 162 164 166 169 170 172 Figure 66 67 68 69 7O 71 72 73 74 75 76 Ir Spectra of LDH-SiW11039 at different temperatures. ------ DSC and TGA of LDH-SiW1 1039. XRD pattern of LDH-BW11039 at different temperatureS.--- a) 25°C, b) 150°C, c) 180°C: dotted line for the rehydrated sample, solid line for the dehydrated sample, (1) 210°C, e) 260°C, and f) 500°0C. Ir spectra of LDH-BW11039 at different temperatures. ------ DSC and TGA of LDH-BW11039. XRD pattern of LDH-Co2W12042 at different temperatures. a) 25°C, b) 120°C, c) 180°C: dotted line for the rehydrated sample, solid line for the dehydrated sample, d) 225°C, e) 320°oc, and t) 500°0C. Ir spectra of LDH-Co2W12042 at different temperatureS.--— DSC and TGA of LDH-C02W12042. XRD pattern of LDH-PW9034 at different temperatures-«- a) 25°C, b) 110°C: dotted line for the rehydrated sample, solid line for the dehydrated sample, c) 175°C, d) 215°C, e) 320°C, and f) 500°0C. Ir spectra of LDH-PW9034 at different temperatures.-------- DSC and TGA of LDH-PW9O34. xiv Page 175 176 178 181 183 185 188 189 191 194 196 Figure 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 Ir Spectra 0f LDH-PV14042 at different temperatures. ------ XRD pattern of LDH-PV14042 at differrent temperatureS.--- a) 25°C, b) 125°C, c) 185°C, (1) 320°C, and e) 500°C. DSC and TGA of LDH-PV14042. XRD pattern of LDH-NaP5W300110 at different temperatures. a) 25°C, b) 120°C: dotted line for the rehydrated sample, solid line for the dehydrated sample, c) 180°C: dotted line for the rehydrated sample, solid line for the dehydrated sample, d) 250°C, and e) 500°C. Ir spectra of LDH-NaP5W300110 at different temperatures.- DSC and TGA of LDH-NaP5W300110. XRD pattern of LDH-H2W12042 at different temperatures.- a) 25°C, b) 120°C, c) 180°C, d) 230°C, e) 320°C and f) 500°C. 1r spectra of LDH-H2W12042 at different temperatures.---- DSC and TGA of LDH-H2W12042. N2 adsorption isotherm of LDH-POMS. T-curve of LDH-C1. XRD pattern for wet samples of l) LDH-PV14042 and 2) LDH-NaP5W300110, wet sample. XV Page 194 199 202 204 207 209 21 1 214 215 216 218 229 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION A. Pillaring of Lamellar Solids The concept of pillaring lamellar solids was first introduced by Barrer and Mcleod in 19551 by showing that permanent porosity could be induced in smectite clay (e.g., montrnorillonite) by replacing the interlayer N 3+ ions with alkylammonium ions. The alkylammonium ions functioned as molecular props or pillars between the silicates and provided the intracrystalline free spaces between the pillars. The pillaring agents range from thermally unstable organic or organometallic cations, e.g., bicyclic amine cationszs3 and tris metal chelates4:5 to thermally stable polyoxo cations,6-11 e.g., A11304(0H)24(HzO)127+, and related chromium- and zirconium-polyoxocations. In fact, the term ‘pillaring clay’ is being used frequently in reference to clays interlayered with thermally stable polyoxy aggregates. Since the charge density of smectite clays is relatively low, the lateral distance between pillars is sufficiently large and the layers are sufficiently rigid to allow for the existence of free void volume between the pillars. Such pore volume then becomes available for adsorption and possible catalytic reaction of substrates sufficiently small to reach the intracrystalline pores. The adsorption study provides the insight of such porous materials. A few pillarable host lattices other than smectite clay have been reported. a.- Zirconium phosphate, in which the layers are cross-linked by bis-alkyl phosphonic group,12- 14 are another example of a pillared lamellar solid. But, in general, pillared 2'- lamellar solids are still quite rare. The major reason for such rarity is that there has not been found suitable host lattices which meets the basic requirements for a pillarable lattice, that is, 1) a reasonably low layer charge density, and 2) a reasonably rigid lattice layer. In this work, the first pillared oxide structure other than smectite clays will be presented. The host lattice is a layered double hydroxide (LDH), which has about three to four times higher surface charge density (about 25-35 A2/e) than smectite clay. Therefore, the guest anion Should have high charge density to compensate the high surface charge density of the host layer. Polyoxometalates, which have a wide range of charge density and a variety of Sizes, would be a suitable class of guest anions which meet this requirement. B. Layered Double Hydroxide (LDH) 1. Structure There are many natural minerals and synthetic compounds having compositions of the type: [M(II)l-xM(III)x(0H)2]+X[A“‘x/n-YH201 where M(II) = Mg, Fe, Ni, Zn, Cu M(III) = A1, Fe, Cr An- = 0032-, 8042-, N033 x = halides, Fe(CN)53-, 0042—, ClO4-, etc 0.2 < x < 0.33 They are referred to as pyroaurite-sjogrenite mineral groups,15 hydrotalcite-like minerals,16 mixed metal hydroxides,17 and layered double hydroxides. 13 The latter term, abbreviated LDH, will be used in the present work. They can be derived by the substitution of trivalent ion, M(III) into brucite-like layers, M(II)(OH)2. This introduction imparts a net positive charge on the sheet which is balanced by hydrated anions intercalated between the brucite-like layers. 3 The most common natural LDHS are hydrotalcite and manasseite polymorphs with composition [Mg6A12(OH)16][CO3.4H20]. They are actually stacking polymorphs that have the same basic layer structure. Mg and A1 are randomly distributed among the octahedral sites. In hydrotalcite, the layers are stacked with rhombohedral symmetry (BC-«CAmABu-BC for the brucite-like mainlayers), and three brucite-like layers are present per unit cell (c = 3c’ = 23.4 A). In manasseite, they are stacked with hexagonal symmetry (BC---CB«-BC---) and two brucite layers are present per unit cell (c = 20’ = 15.6 A).19s20 In nature the polymorphs are commonly intergrown. Manasseite generally forms the core and hydrotalcite the outer part of the grain. Thus, hydrotalcite appears to form later than the coexisting manasseite, and presumably, at lower temperature. To date, synthetic hydrotalcite has been prepared, but manasseite has never been synthesized. The crystal structures of the Mg(II)/Fc(III) pyroaurite and sjogrenite polymorphs are the most extensively studied natural LDH’S.20-23 They possess the same morphology as the Mg(II)/Al(III), hydrotalcite and manasseite polymorphs. In both compounds, brucite-like layers carrying a net positive charge alternate with layers in which the oxygen atoms of carbonate groups and water molecules are Statistically distributed on a single set of sites. Adjacent brucite-like layers are stacked so that the hexagonal groups on the lower surface of one layer are directly above those on the upper surface of the layer below, as in gibbsite, and not as in brucite. The 2H (hexagonal) and 3R (rhombohedral) subgroups represent the two simplest sequences satisfying this condition. The sequence of the OH layers in pyrourite and sjogrenite are the same as with those of hydrotalcite and manasseite, respectively. The distance between two metal layers in pyroaurite equals c/3 = 7.80 A. Because the brucite layers are only about 4.8 A thick, a Space of 3.0 A is left between them. This space is occupied by a disordered interlayer, [1/8003-1/2H2O]0-25'. The distances parallel to the z-axis between layers are the same in both polymorphs: Mg + Fe layer to OH layer, 1.02 A; between 0H layers in the brucite layer, 2.04 A; OH layer to interlayer, 2.88 A. Fig. 1 shows the layer sequences in O 7'8A 0-125 cog' + ()5 H20 OH 075 Mp2° + 025 1303' OH- 0125 cog' + 05 H20 OH 0-75 Mgz°+ 0:25 Fe” 014' Fig. 1. Layer sequences in pyroaurite and sjogrenite. The brucite-like layers are shaded. 5 pyroaurite and sjogrenite. Some natural minerals with the relevant crystal symmetries are given in Table 1. Table 1. Some Natural Minerals of the Pyroaurite-Sjogrenite Group22 Name Approximate Composition 3R-Typ 2H-Type Hydroxide Interlayer '— Sheet Sheet Pymam‘itc sjogrenite [Mg6F62(OH)16]°[(C03)(HzO)4l Hydrotalcite Manasseite [Mg6A12(OH)16]-[(CO3)(H20)4] Stichtite Barbertonite [Mg6Cr2(0H)16]-[(CO3)(H20)4] Reevestite ------ [Ni6Fe2(OH)16]-[(C03)(H20)4] TakOVitc ------ [Ni6A12(OH)16]:[(C03)0120)4l 2. Synthesis of LDHS Feitchnecht24 has Shown that a large number of synthetic LDHS can be prepared by titrating the solution containing divalent and trivalent cations with NaOH. Other workers have been involved in the modification and refinement of Feitchnecht’s coprecipitation method. Mortland and GastuschZS prepared the mixed Mg/Al hydroxides from the corresponding chlorides aged in a dialyzed medium, achieving in this way a much better crystallization and a high purity. They found that two mixed Mg/Al hydroxides having Mg/Al ratios of about 5:1 and 2:1 were formed from solution with Mg/Mg-I-Al molar ratios of 0.8 and 0.7, respectively. They have layer dimensions a = 3.048 A, layer thickness 7.6 A for the Al-rich compound and a = 3.072 A, layer thickness 7.92 A for the Al-poor compound. 6 Coprecipitation, followed by hydrothermal treatment, has been used by Miyata.26 The hydrothermal treatment of freshly coprecipitatcd products results in highly crystalline LDHS in a relatively short period of time. The hydrothermal and high temperature ‘dry’ technique was introduced by Roy et al.27 Solid MgO and A1203, which were the source of cations, were heated in the presence of H20 and C02 or N205, which were the source of C032- and N03- anions, respectively. The products were LDH-C032- and LDH-NO3- respectively, where LDH stands for the positively charged Mg/Al brucite layer. This dry technique is useful when carbonate-free LDH is required. Recently, R.M. T aylor23 reported a new method, called "induced hydrolysis", which involves the hydrolysis of a cation in solution by a fully hydrolyzed and precipitated hydroxide of a second metach cation. The term induced hydrolysis was coined because the fully hydrolyzed cation, that is, the hydroxide, caused complete hydrolysis of the second cation at a pH below that at which this reaction would normally occur. This technique utilized one cation typically M(III) as a hydroxide, formed from a solution of its chloride or nitrate salt. The advantage of this method is that crystalline compounds with reasonably sharp x-ray powder diffraction (XRD) patterns are formed within a few hours at room temperature. The pH values for precipitation of some typical LDH systems are listed in Table 2. 3. Ion-exchange Property of LDHS Since the exchangeability of the interlayer C032' of takovite [Ni3Al(0H)8]2-C03-4H20 was first found by Bish,29 a variety of anion exchanged LDHS have been prepared. Miyata30 has reported quantitative Studies of ion exchange properties of LDHS. The ion selectivities of monovalent anions are in the order of OH- > F- > C1- > Br- > N03- > I-. Ion selectivity of bivalent anions, which are higher than those of mono- valent anions, order as 0032- > 8042-. Such anion-exchanged forms of LDHS provide better XRD patterns than freshly precipitated LDHS. Table 2. pH Values for Synthesis of LDHS by the Induced Hydrolysis Method LDH pH N i-Al-CO32- 6.9 Co-Al-Cl- 7.4 Mn-Al-Cl- 7.5 Mg-Al CI- 8.4 Co-Fe-Cl- 7,4 Co-Si(IV) 7.4 Fe-V(IV) 4.0 8 4. Comparison of LDH and Smectite Swelling Pr0perties The unidimensional swelling of smectite clays is their most interesting and important property. A number of polar molecules can be intercalated in multilayer form and thereby expand the galleries to substantial heights. The molecules may enter in stages, that is, one mono layer at a time.31 The adsorption of water on sodium beidellite is shown in Fig. 2.32 One mono layer is formed in the interlayer gallery at H20 partial pressures between approximately 0.1 to 0.6, and one more mono layer is built up to yield two mono-layers at partial pressures between 0.6 and 0.9. With sodium montrnorillonite and hectorite the water layers can be built up infinitely and the clay layers are essentially exfoliated. Bradley et al-33 showed that water molecules could be sorbed in monomolecular sheets in montrnorillonite, and that one, two, three, or four water layers were possible. The occurrence of "Steps" in the basal spacing of swelling minerals as a function of water content is now a generally accepted phenomenon. The first water to enter the interlayer positions is the result of hydration of the ions34 after which the water forms distinct layers which increase in number. The water molecules of, at least, the first layers, are probably arranged in a hexagonal network35 whose order is determined by hydrogen bonding to oxygens of the clay. This type of swelling is commonly referred to as Type 1,36 Short range swelling,37 or crystalline swelling.38 In this range, the adsorbed water increases to about 0.5g H20/g clay while the interlayer Spacing increases from 9.5 A for the dry material to about 20 A, corresponding to four layers of water. The mechanism of this Type 1, Short range, or crystalline swelling has been explained in terms of the hydration energy of both interlayer cations and silicate layers.37 When the interlayer cations in montrnorillonite become hydrated, and the layer energy involved is able to overcome the attractive forces between layers, Type 1 swelling takes place. Since in the prototype minerals interlayer cations are absent, there is no cation hydration energy available to separate the layers and no swelling occurs in these types of minerals. 85.28 3838-2 Lo 3 mecca... 33 .N .mE om\n a rod ed so me cm a... L H H N H 1 CO H I fl‘ H In H I to H (v) (100)p 10 There is another type of swelling. Vermiculites and smectites when saturated with certain ions are capable of swelling to give much larger spacings between the layers than those normally observed with interlamellar complexes (Type 1). This type of swelling is called osmotic or type 2 swelling.36 Its essential features are not only the large spacings observed but also the different nature of the forces between the layers. It is due to the diffuse double-layer repulsion by which the particles or the layers may be pushed further apart. In smectite the net negative layer charge is compensated by cations which are located on the layer surface in the dried clay. In the presence of water, these compensating cations have a tendency to diffuse away from the layer surface since their concentration will be smaller in the bulk solution. On the other hand, they are attracted electrostatically to the charged layers. The result of opposing trends is creation of an atmospheric distribution of compensating cations in a diffuse electrical double layer on the exterior layer surface of a clay particle. The compensating cations between the layers of the stack are confined to the narrow space between opposite layer surfaces. These forces are osmotic and result from a balance of electrostatic forces, van der Waals forces and the osmotic pressure of the interlamellar ions. The distance between the layers is not even approximately constant but shows a distribution covering a considerable range of distances. The transition from normal or Type 1 interlamellar swelling to Type 2 swelling is sharp. The swelling in the Type 2 is dependent on the concentration of electrolyte in the solution. The silicate-layer separation normally increases linearly as function of the reciprocal of the square root of the salt concentration}2 Normal electrical double layers are presumably developed between the layers. As shown in Fig. 3, N orrish32 demonstrated that in N a-montrnorillonite the individual layers dissociate completely as the water content is increased. The spacing first increases in steps corresponding to various organized structures of water molecules until 20 A is reached and then jumps to 40 A, after which it increases linearly.In the zone of large spacing ( i.e. > 40 A), single spacing is replaced by a statistical distribution. Osmotic swelling in the swellable ll Eons—om vOmmaz E o .2328 5.2 E x .chomm— £9502 has .86 eBEBem-mz e8 cocebeoocoo .8 58 use?“ Mo 36838: 53, cameo—$88258 Lo €0.8— 5223 memos“: :38 Baggage Lo owSEU .m .wE 310 mmacmemme a q E q q A _4 —4 _ 1 tom 1 O 0‘) l o IN (1?) fiugoeds JEUBIOJGIUI l O P p 10m— 12 minerals depends largely on the surface charge density and charge localization as well as the nature of the exchangeable cation. Table 3 shows the swelling property of expandable 2:1 minerals.39 There have been two reported cases of LDHS that swell. One of these is [Ca2A1(OH)6][OH-2H2O]40 with a basal spacing of 7.4 A. When it takes up water to produce [Ca2Al(OH)6][OH.6H20], the basal spacing increases up to 10.7 A indicative that one mono layer of water has been built up in the gallery. The other case is [Zn2Cr(OH)6][org.]4l in which org. represents organic anions, for example, alkyl sulfates. Table 4 shows the swelling of [Zn2Cr(OH)6][org.] with polar organic solvents. The behavior is analogous to that of alkylammonium layer silicate.42 The basal Spacing after swelling of dodecyl sulfate with dodecyl alcohol corresponds to the value calculated for alkyl double layer (41.3 A). 5. Thermal Stability of LDHS The thermal stability of LDHS are very important in their application for heterogeneous catalysts at elevated temperature. A thermal study of the hydrotalcite was done by G.W. Brindley and S. Kikkwa.43 They reported that the XRD pattern showed little or no change up to 240°C, but at 260-2800C there was an abrupt decrease of basal spacing to 6.2-6.4 A which was followed by a continued decrease until complete decomposition occurred at around 370°C. Following the abrupt basal spacing decrease to 6.4 A at 260°C, and further decrease to 6.2 A at 280°C, the mineral could be rehydrated to give the initial basal spacing. This initial collapse was due to decomposition of the CO3 groups, CO32- ---—> C02 + 02'; the oxygen anions remained between the hydroxide layers. The hydroxide layers were more closely packed than the bulky CO3 groups. At this state, the layers were sufficiently separated to permit water molecule penetration and reexpansion to the original spacing. The continued decrease in basal Spacing to about 5.5 A at higher temperature was attributed to hydroxide layer 13 Table 3. Classification of 2:1 Minerals according to the Swelling in Water and the Exchangeable Cation (after Suquet)39 Hydratign state Exchangeable Cation Li Na K CL Mg Bg Infinite MBSV MB M 3 water layers MB(S) MBS MBS 2 water layers V BSV M (B)SV (S)V (S)V 1 water layer BSV 0 water layer V M = Montmorillonite, B = Beidellite, S = Saponite, V = Vermiculite Table 4. Swelling of [Zn2Cr(OH)6][C12H25804'-nH20] in n-Alcohol swelling agent d(A) swelling agent d(A) C3H7OH 28.3 C10H21OH 38.2 C4H90H 29.2 C12H250H 41.1 C6H13OH 30.8 C14H290H 42.4 C3H17OH 33.7 C16H33OH 44.9 l4 decomposition and accommodation of 02' anions more or less within these layers. The minimum spacing of 5.5 A approached that of brucite. Generally speaking, the thermal Stability of LDHS depends on both interlayer anions and the compositions of brucite-like layers. Table 5. shows the dehydroxylation temperature. Table 5. Thermal stability of [M(ll)1-xM(III)(OH)2][An-] M(II) M(III) x An- Dehydroxylation ref. temperathC) Mg Al 0.25 8042- 455 44 Mg Al 0.25 Cr042- 460 44 Mg Al 0.25 CO32‘ 440 44 Ni Al 0.26 Cl- 300 45 Zn Al 0.25 Cl- 280 45 Mg Al 0.25 N03- 455 45 Mg Al 0.33 Cl- 430 45 Mg Al 0.25 CI’ 415 45 Mg Al 0.24 CI' 400 45 Mg Fe 0.25 CO32' 250 46 6. Application of LDHS Synthetic LDHS, particularly carbonate derivatives, are utilized as acid adsorbents,47 antipeptins,48 Ziegler-Nana type catalyst supports,49 in combination with a polyolefins as nontoxic and non smoke flame retardants,50 catalyst precursors of syn gas-to-methanol production,51 and catalyst precursors for the aldol condensation.52 The pristine LDHS, e.g., [Zn2Cr(OH)6]XonH20 have been tested for the triphase catalyst.53 Thin films of LDHS deposited on electrodes have also been tested for the modification of electrode.54 15 B. Polyoxometalate 1. Structure and Properties of Polyoxometalates Polyoxomelates are represented by the general f0rmula55 [MmOylp' (isopolyanions) and [XmeOyN‘ (x < m) (heteropolyanions), where M is usually molybdenum or tungsten, and less frequently vanadium, niobium 0r tantalum, or mixture of these elements in their highest oxidation states. Such polyoxometalates form a structurally distinct class of complexes based predominantly, although not exclusively, upon quasi-octahedral-coordinated metal atoms (M06). There are two types of polyoxometalates formed by two different M06 units. Type I has only one terminal oxygen as shown in Fig. 4 a). On the other hand, Type II has two terminal oxygens as shown Fig. 4 b). Many WW I) and M0(VI) polyoxoanions are seen to be on larger, neutral MnO3n cages that encapsulate anionic subunits and are linked to them only by weak ( > 2.2 A) b0nds.56 For example, among the Type I class of polyoxoanions, W60192' contains a W6013 cage encapsulating 02’. Thus, W60192- can be expressed by (W6018)(02-). PM0120403- by (M012036)(PO43-). W100324* by (W 10030)(02')2. P2M0180626' by (M018054)(P043')2. and so on. In the limit an infinitely large cage is formed by the linking of Type I M06. Precisely such a compound is found in the M003-2H2O structure.57 There is another type of polyoxoanions formed by the linking of Type II octahedra. For examples, consider M04012(O2)24- in which the M04012 ring is encapsulating (022-)2, expressed by (M04012)(022')2, 82M050244r by (M05015)(SO32-). P4W804012' by (W 8024)(PO43-)4. and so on. In the limit of a large ring of Type H polyanion one obtains an infinite chain structure of the composition M03. Precisely such chains are found in the M003 st11.lcture.58 The most extensively studied polyoxometalate compounds are those with Keggin structures, XM1204on-. There are five possible isomers as shown in Fig. 5. Since Keggin reported the structure of 12-tungst0ph0sph0ric acid in 1933,59 it has customarily 16 O u “i l— W\:{ g '''''''''' Mo:5 8:)? A; a) b) Fig. 4. Two types of M06 octahedra a) Type I and b) Type II. Fig. 5. The five Baker-Figgis isomers of the Keggin Structure (a). In B—, y—, 8- and 8- two, three and four M3013 groups (Shown unshaded) have been rotated SUUCIUI'CS one, by 1t/3. 18 been referred to as the a-form. This structure is based on a cenual X04 tetrahedron surrounded by twelve M06 octahedra arranged in four groups of three edge shared octahedra, M3013 (M3 triplet). These groups are linked by shared comers to each other and to the central X04 tetrahedron. The majority of heteropoly tungstates adopt either the Keggin structure or structures derived from fragments of that structure. Table 6 shows numerous heteropoly molybdates and tungstates with the tit-Keggin Structure. An isomer of the Keggin structure is known for several tungstates (X = B, Si, Ge, H2) and molybdates; these appear to contain the B-Keggin Structure. Fig. 6 shows the 0t- and B-Keggin Structures. The B-Keggin structure has one of the three edge-shared M3013 triplets of the a-structure rotated by 600 around the C3 axis (designated by R), thereby reducing the overall symmetry of the anion from Td to C3v. The new comer- shared W-O-W linkage between the rotated group (R) and the rest of the anion involves a shorter W--W separation (3.65 vs 3.72 A) and a more acute W-O-W angle(-145° vs 155°) than the a-Structure. Both of these features may account for the lower stability of B vs at i.e., increased coulombic repulsion6O and less favorable pn-dn interactions,61 respectively. The B-structure is one of several proposed by Baker and Figgis;55 the others involve the 60° rotation of two, three, and all four M3013 as shown in Fig. 5. All oxidized B—forms spontaneously isomerize to 01-forms at rates which vary from seconds for B—PM012 at room temperature62 to hours for B—SiW12 at 150°C.63 The polarographic reduction waves for B-isomers parallel those for tit-isomers, but they exhibit slightly more positive potentials. It follows that the reduced B-structure is more stable than the a-structurc. The optical absorption Spectra of reduced B—isomers are similar and are unlike those of the corresponding reduced a-isomers. When solutions of XW 12040 are treated with base (pH > ca 5) a complex series of hydrolysis reactions ensues, leading to a variety of lacunary anions. Fig. 7 Shows the reaction pathway as well as the species involved in each step. 19 Table 6. Heteropoly Tungstates and Molybdates with tit-Keggin Structure 4 Md X [XW12040]n- H. H2. B. A1. 030103. Si. Ge(IV). P(V). AS(V). V(V)b. Cr(III). Mn(IV)C. Fe(III). C0(III), Cu(II), Cu(I), Zn, Se(IV)c, Te(IV), Sb(III)C, Bi(III)C [XM012040]"' Si. Ge(IV). P(V). AS(V). V(V)b. WWW. Zr(IV)C, ln(nl)c, sz, Mod a Known as lacunary (GeW11) anion only. b In mixed addenda (V + W, V + Mo) anions only. c Confirmation desirable. d Existence questionable. 20 a (7;) Fig. 6. a and B structures of heteropolyanions of the 12-series 21 2- 2- A 51013 +1NO4 ] Fig. 7. Polyhedral models and relationships between the different known tungstosilicatas. This scheme is base partry on structural determination by single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies and partly on proposed structures. Hydrolysis of the B—SiW120404‘ anion only gives B2-SiW110393' and , then, the y-SinoO368‘ anion. 22 Since each of the above polyanions is electrochemically reducible, the interconversions and isomerizations can be followed by polarography. The half-wave potentials of each tungstosilicate species are given in Table 7. All of the lacunary anions, except a-XW 11 and, perhaps, Siwlo appear to be metastable in solution. But conditions of pH, temperature, etc., can be arranged so that decomposition and isomerization reactions are slow, and intermediate salts can be crystallized. The B-XW12 structure can give rise to three isomeric KW 11 anions shown in Fig. 7. For X = Si and Ge all three isomers have been observed and isolated. Historically, the isomers were named to corresponding to the spontaneous direction of isomerization B1 --—> B3. The structure were assigned on the basis of electrostatic arguments.60 The structures Show a diminution of the number of short W---W separations between rotated and unrotated W3 groups in the sequence B1 —> B2 —9 B3 -) 0.. The properties of the B-Sinl isomers parallel those of a-Sinl except that irreversible isomerization occurs in solution. Estimates of the half-lives of the SiW11 isomers at pH = 5 and 25°C are 01, 11hr; 02, 7.5hr; 03, 4.5hr.64 Alkaline degradation of a-XW11 and B-XW11 at pH > 8 leads to a-XW9 and B-XW9 anions, respectively, as shown in Fig. 7. There are no stable B-isomers of or- [XW12O4013- and a-[XW11039]7‘ (X = P, As). In aqueous solutions PW12 has a limited stability range. At pH = 1.5 - 2, PW12 is rapidly (and reversibly) converted to the lacunary PW11 anion. The properties of further degradated species XW9 (X = P, As) seem to parallel those of SiW9 and GeW9 in many, but not all aspects. The following scheme Shows the presently known interconversions. 23 Table 7. Polarographic Half-Wave Potentialsa of Lacunary Tun gstosilicate Anions55 Anion E 1Q}; Ma of electrons) a-SiW9 -0.78 (4) B-SiW9 -0.80 (2) -0.90 (2) a—Sinl -0.65 (2) -091 (2) B1-SiW11 -0.63 (2) -0.83 (2) B2-SiW11 -O.63 (2) -0.77 (2) B3-SiW11 -0.69 (2) -0.89 (2) b Dropping mercury electrode; 1.0 M sodium acetate/acetic acid pH 4.7. vs. SCE liXW9 X043-,WO42- \ 24 l l rapid ot-xw9 .-.=== [x2w19068114-e==2 a-XWll OH“ l [X2W2107116- a-XW12 Besides the instability of B-[XW11039J7’ and the non-existence (to date) of B-XW12, the above scheme differs from that of the tungstosilicates by the inclusion of X2W19 (X = P) and X2W21 (X = P, As) complexes.66 The only authenticated heteropolyanions containing boron are the tungstoborates. The interconversion of isomers is shown below.67 25 H+, W042' _\ _—’ 8033-, w042- F==$ h-BWll ........=: h’-BW12 e===e h-BW12 I a-BW12 Unlike other or-XWIZ species, or-BW12 decomposes above pH = 6.5 directly to borate and tungstate; no a-BWll or BW9 species is known. The 13er species is readily isolated as a potassium salt, K8HBW11033-17H2O,67 from mixture of borate and tungstate at pH = 6.5, and has been shown to belong to the h-series by its reversible interconversion with h-BW12. The isomerization h --—> (1, occurs in solution at pH < 5, but it becomes very slow in acidic solution. At pH = 5.5, where h-BW12 has been converted to h’-BW12, no isomerization occurs even on boiling. Complexes are known in which the ‘ligand’ is a polyanion structure that is deficient in single M06 octahedron. Metal ion binding occurs at the vacant site. Mono vacant Keggin derivatives form by far the largest and versatile class of lacunary polyanions, and their complexes have been intensively Studied since the first examples were recognized in 1966.68 A list of polyanion ligands that have been observed in such complexes is given in Table 8. Two global Stochiometries are observed for the complexes, metalz‘ligand’ = 1:1 and 1:2. The 1:1 complexes are formed predominantly with ‘octahedral’ metal ions, with the polyanion ligand functioning in a dentate manner. In the 1:2 complexes the metal ion 26 Table 8. Lacunary 1:11 and 2:17 Polyanion Ligandsa.55 90mm X Isomer [XW12039]n- P, AS 01 Si. Ge (1.131. 132. B3 B hb Al, Ga, Fe(III), Co(III) 010 Co(II), Zn, H2 ad Sb(III), Bi(lII) -e [XL/[011039]n- P. As, Si, Ge 01 [x2w17061110- P a1. a2 AS a a Species of which complexes have been isolated. b The free ligand has the currently unknown ‘h’ Structure. Complexes appear to contain the or form. c a-structure not proved in every case, but considered very probable. d Free ligand not known. e True structure not known. 27 Table 9. Heteroatoms and Terminal Ligands observed in (XMl 1)ZL and (Z2M17)ZL Complexesa. 55 M.L Heteroatom. Z Refs. 02- w6+/5+, Mo6+/S+, v5+/4+ Ti4+, Sn4+, Nb5+, Rh3+, 69, 70, 71, 72 Ge4+, Re7+/6+, Sb5+ 73, 74 H20b v3+, Cr3+, Mn2+/3+, Ni2+ 68, 74, 75, 76 Fe2+/3+, C02+/3+, Cu2+, 77, 78, 79, 80 Zn2+, A13+, Ga3+, In3+, 81, 82, Rh3+ Ru3+/4+ 83 N3' 086+ 84 NO Ru2+l3+ 85 N113, NCS-, N02-, N33 CN', pyridine, C02+/3+, Fe3+, Ni2+, 75, 86 pyrazine, thiourea Zn2+d Fe(CN)54-, 5032- Fe2+ 74 a This table excludes complexes where ZL represents an organometallic moiety. b In several cases the sz are such that stable hydroxometal derivatives are isoable. c Unsubstituted, 2- and 4-methyl, 3-cyano. d Not all metal-ligand combinations. 28 Table 10. Heteroatoms of Z(XM11)2 and Z(X2M17)2 Complexesas55 mm Refs. cc4+l3+, pr3+, Nd3+, 3313+, 5113+, 1103+ 90 Th4+, U5+/4+ 91, 92, 93, 94 P144“, Tb4+/3+, Pu4+/3+, Np4+, Am4+/3+, 95, 96, 97 Cm4+/3+, Cf4+/3+ 1n3+b 98 La3+ 99 Sr2_+,_B_a2_t 100 a All tungstates. b Note that two types of complex, with six- and eight coordinate In3+, appear to be formed. 29 can be viewed as 8—coordinate. The Sixth coordination site on the metal in the 1:1 complexes may be occupied by a variety of ligands L, as shown in Table 9. Although the lacunary anions Spontaneously isomerize (B1 --—> "-9 0t; a1 -—9 (12), the substituted species appear to be quite stable in this respect. The substituted complexes are generally Stable at pH ca. 4-8 although most of the molybdate complexes are much less stable than the tungstate complexes. In acidic solution, the complexes lose the 211+ cations and the lacunary ligands are converted to XM12 0r X2M18. In neutral or basic solution, the water molecules coordinated to 211+ may be deprotonated before the heteropolyanion is hydrolyzed. Replacement of coordinated water on Zn+ by a number of ligands has been studied by Weakley36 and Baker et al.-75:33. Since the molybdenum and tungsten atoms in the Keggin and XM11 Structure are reducible (to form heteropoly blues), certain complexes have intense low energy charge transfer bands that correspond to (Zn+,M5+)---(Z(n-1),M5+) transitions. Such bands are observed when Z is V4+, V34", Mn2+, Fe2+, M05+, Re6+, Re5+. In some cases, reduction potentials of Z and M are so evenly balanced that valence isomers can exist, e.g., B1-[SiW1 1Vm(1120)039]5‘ (at pH < 6) and B1-[SiW10WVV1VO4OJ7’ (at pH > 10).39 A second type of complex shown in Table 10 is formed by the lacunary ligands XM11 and X2M17 with lanthanide and actinide cations. These complexes have the stoichiometry metal(ligand)2 and the first examples were reported by Peacock and Weakley.100 The high charge carried by the bis-ligand complexes enables the stabilization of ‘unusual’ oxidation states for the heteroatom, e.g., tetravalent Pr, Tb, Am, Cm, and Cf and pentavalent U. 2. Charge Distribution of Polyoxometalates It is commonly asserted that heteropoly anions, particularly those with the almost Spherical Keggin structure, are unsolvated in aqueous solution and do not participate in hydrogen bonding in the crystalline state. Various lines of experimental evidence, including viscosity102 and diffusion studies,102 and crystal structure determination,104 30 A\ ;;\\\\\\\\‘vA\\\v “(WNQA T “\\\\v ‘ “V— \\ " A/ ._,t\\\ I], Fig. 8. Polyhedral representation of a) a-SiV3W9O407' and b) B—SiV3W9O4O6'. 31 tend to support that assertion. l2-molybdosilicate and 12-molybdophophate anions are less susceptible to hydrogen bonding than is the perchlorate ion.104 Since there is no apparent Steric hindrance to heteroconjugation, these results confirm the very low surface charge density of such polyanions. It has been known that the negative charge on the surface of the polyoxoanion is concentrated on specific oxygen atoms. Klemperer et al.106 determined the protonated oxygen site of HV2W40193- by 170 NMR. They observed an upfield Shift of only the 0V2 (bridging oxygen) resonance upon protonation of V2W40194-. This change in chemical shift identified the 0V2 oxygen in the V2W40194- cluster as the protonation site. All resonances except the 0V2 resonance in V2W40194- shifted downfield upon protonation of the cluster. This downfield shift reflects a strengthening of metal-oxygen bonds and concomitant reduction of negative charge on the oxygen atoms in HV2W40193'. More recently, Klemperer et al.107 reported the most basic site of oxygen atoms of cis-Nb2W4O194- by its alkylation reaction pattern. They concluded that the bridging oxygen (Nb-O-Nb) was the most basic site, i.e., site with most nucleophilicity. Also they found that charge delocalization substantially occurred in the anion when the product distribution was considered. The enhanced reactivity of Nb2W40194‘ compared to tha of W60192- is additional supporting evidence for the idea of a charge delocalization. The 0W2 oxygen in W60192- were not alkylated by dimethyl sulfate in acetonitrile even after 2 days at ambient temperature. In contrast, the 0W2 oxygens in Nb2W40194' were alkylated under the same condition in less than 5 minutes. It has been reported“)8 that the protonation site of SiV3W9O407- was assigned to the 0V2 oxygen (bridging oxygen) by 51V NMR, as shown in Fig. 8. 3. Photochemistry of POMS The photocatalytic process of polyoxoanions was first examined in detail by Papaconstantinou et al.,109 who subsequently demonstrated that reduced polyoxoanions 32 could be reoxydized by air, thereby completing a catalytic cycle. They suggested the following mechanism for the photooxidation of isopropanol by the polyoxoanion PW1204031110 hv PW123' + MeZCHOH ------------- —9 PW124' + Me2C0H + H2“ hv PW124" + M62C0H =- PW125‘ + Me2CO + H+ PW125- + PW123- EA 2PW124' 2PW124- + 1/202 + 2H+ ------- -) zpw123- + H20 PW125- + 1/202 + 2H+ --------- —> PW123' + H20 Me2CI-IOH + 1/202 => Me2CO + H20 In the absence of 02, PW124’ can react with H+ according to PW124- + H+ => PW123‘ + 1/2H2 Therefore, the total reaction in the absence of 02 will be dehydrogenation : hv R1R2CHOH => RleCO + H2 33 Recently, Hill and Bouchard111 reported that polyoxometalates (POMS) could be classified according to their photocatalytic reactivities: Type I : Nb, Ta oxometalates, for example, M60198- can not be photoreduced by any organic material even with u.v. light ( < 290 nm) Type II : These are readily photoreduced by a wide variety of organic substrates, but the reduced species are relatively and thermodynamically incapable of evolving hydrogen. Nearly all heteropoly and isopolymolybdates as well as polyvanadates are in this category. Thermal reoxidation of the reduced form of this type POM with O2 is usually kinetically slow and sometimes thermodynamically unfavorable. Type III : Nearly all heteropoly- and isopoly-tungstates undergo both facile photoreduction at 25°C by a variety of organic substrates, and the reduced forms undergo facile hydrogen evolution or air (02) oxidation. He suggested the following mechanism for the photooxidation of organic substrate by POMS. Pn- + 8H2 =5 (P—H)“' + SH- PIT- + 8H2 :wfi PH'.SH2 hv Pn'°SH2 ‘___. __.s__ p(n+l)-. SH2+° P(n+1)‘SI-I2+. ----------- —) P(n+1)' + 31-124"- 34 p(n+1)-.SH2+. S. p(n+2)- + S + 2H+ SH2+~ -----------——> HS- + W“ Pn' + HS. ----------- -> p(n+l)- + S + H+ P(n+2)~ + Pn- -------- -+ 2p(n+1)- They emphasized that the two most likely mechanisms for the key substrate oxidation steps were radical hydrogen abstraction and electron transfer : Pn- + R2CHOH -----_, P-H(“‘1)' + RZCOH Pn- + R2CHOH --------- —> P secondary alcohol >> tertiary alcohol When V5+ is substituted for W6+ as in P2V5W15062, the compound will bear three extra negative charges so that the electron density shifts toward the vanadium oxide terminal oxygen (-O4V!O’). The oppositely charged terminal oxygen will interfere electrostatically with the necessary complexation at the terminal VO site. Since negative charge is delocalized in the polyoxoanions by the bond alternation mechanism,56 the tungsten sites should also exhibit diminished reactivity. The reactivity also depends on the heteroatom in the same type of POM. The order of decreasing reactivity is H > Fe >> Co, Si. The diminished reactivity has an electronic basis that allows for more efficient back electron transfer to the adsorbed oxidized species. Papaconstantinou reported114 that the rate of electron donation from alkyl radical to POM depended on the charge of the POMs and their reduction potentials. Increasing the negative charge on the complex and increasing the negative reduction potentials of the POM leads to a decrease in the electron transfer rate. 36 Fox finally proposed Scheme 1 for the photooxidation of 2-butanol by PW1204o3-(1).113 She suggested that path a, the two electron, two proton route, was more likely on the basis of several evidences. For example, the order of reactivity of substrate paralleled that of substrate ionization potential. C. Adsorption onto Porous Materials Since the pillared LDHS to be discussed in this work contain micropores, it is appropriate to review briefly the method used to measure micropore volume and size. The pore-types of porous materials are classified into three categories according to their sizes :115 Macropores : widths > 500 A Mesopores : 20 A < widths < 500 A Micropores : widths < 20 A Their adsorption mechanisms are different. The mesopore surface is the scene of monomolecular and polymolecular adsorption of vapors, i.e., layer-by-layer coverage ending in the volume filling of this pore type by the capillary condensation mechanism. The specific surface areas of mesopore structures vary within the range 10 to 400 m2/g. Adsorption on a microporous adsorbent involves not only the successive formation of adsorption layers on the surface of the micropores, but also the filling of their adsorption spaces. The concept of a surface area of microporous adsorbents loses its physical significance. A characteristic feature of adsorption on microporous adsorbents is the substantial increase in the adsorption energy and, consequently, the adsorption potentials in micropores, as compared to the corresponding values for mesopores or nonporous adsorbents of a similar chemical nature. An increase in adsorption energy in micropores 37 .8538. .5 .o as. :8. a .25 3.8.3 25.0 s chlé 8 22 358a: .. .I 2. n\ {fwd . @9wa We . from? A x. roam“... from: . W0 i§~ z an.“ 3: ..._ from: 2W... frown“... .qu v 5%: . Wu isms W. L .é/ a i.e.... 7 are; than deV a“. .3 ,2... i... .. . L... We \............, tigid 4 reward oi .flNU 4”" .Wzv. . for“: . L .3 .o:2:m.n .3 52350 wax—58225 2: 3.. Exes—002 v0.89... ._ 8.39m 38 leads to a considerable increase in the value of vapor adsorption in the region of low equilibrium pressures. There have been two equations extensively used to describe the adsorption of vapors onto microporous materials to determine the micropore volume. One of them is an empirical equation proposed by Dubinin and Radushkevich.115 Their equation (D-R equation) is expressed as a = ao cxPl-k(A/B)2], where a/ao is a fraction of adsorption space filled at relative pressure p/po. A = RTln(p/po) and k and B are constants. The micropore volume (a0) is determined by plotting log a against log2(po/p) (so called D-R plot). Marsh and Rand117 demonstrated that this D-R plot extrapolation must be carried out with care, since, although the plot might show linear regions, it is very rarely linear over a wide pressure range. These deviations can be linearized by using a more generalized equation proposed by Dubinin and Astakhov.118 It is expressed by an equation (D-A equation), a = ao cxvl-(A/B)"] where a/ao is the degree of pore filling, A is a differential molar work of adsorption, which is the negative value of Gibb’s free energy of adsorption and is expressed by RTln(po/p), B is a constant parameter which is a characteristic free energy of adsorption, and n is a constant. This D-A equation can also be expressed in another form, log[d(log a)/dA] = log(-nD) — (n-1)log A where D = 1/(2.3OBBn) 39 By plotting log A against log[d(log a)/dA], n can be determined and then by plotting log a against A a0 can be determined. Brunauer et al. have proposed a method (so called MP method, micropore analysis method) for calculating,119 on the basis of an experimental isotherm for vapor adsorption on a microporous adsorbent, the specific surface area, the pore volume and the volume distribution of the micropores according to their sizes. It is based on the so-called t-curve, which is a plot of the statistical thickness of the adsorbed film against p/po for nonporous adsorbents. The statistical thickness t, which is the ordinate of the t-curve, is obtained by dividing the volume of nitrogen adsorbed as liquid at a given p/po by the BET surface area. The isotherm of microporous material is converted into a V1(volume of liquid nitrogen adsorbed)-thickness plot (t—plot) in which the t values are read from a t- curve for standard nonporous material. By analyzing the t-curve, the surface area, pore volume and pore size distribution can be determined. If the t-plot is a linear, then the system consists of a nonporous material. If the t-plot is a non-linear, then the material is porous. CHAPTER II EXPERIMENTAL A. Materials Zinc nitrate hexahydrate, zinc chloride, aluminum nitrate nonahydrate, ammonium chloride, and sodium hydroxide were obtained from Fisher Scientific Company. Aluminum chloride hexahydrate, nitric acid, acetic acid, sodium molybdate dihydrate, ammonium acetate, and methanol were purchased from Mallinckrodt. Cobalt acetate tetrahydrate, tungstic acid (HzWO4), vanadyl sulfate trihydrate, and gold label iso-propyl alcohol were purchased from Aldrich Chemical Company. Ammonium hydroxide, potassium chloride, sodium metasilicate nonahydrate (NazSiO3), and potassium bisulfite from IT Baker Chemical Company were used. Boric acid and hydrochloric acid were obtained from Columbus Chemical Company. Sodium meta- vanadate was purchased from Alfa-Products-Ventron. Sodium tungstate dihydrate was a gift from GTE Sylvania Company. B. Preparation of LDH-Cl and LDH-N03 Pristine layered double hydroxides of the type Zn2Al(OH)6-Cl or -NO3 (LDH- NO3, or -Cl) were prepared by a modification of the induced hydrolysis method of Taylor.28 Deionized water, pre-boiled for 2 hours under N2, was used for the preparation of all solution. All manipulations were carried out under a N2 atmosphere to avoid contact with C02. 1+0 41 To 200 ml of 0.1M Al3+ solution containing the desired anion in a 2-liter three neck round bottom flask was added 1M NaOH solution from a dropping funnel with vigorous stirring. The delivery of the NaOH solution was completed at pH = 7. The white slurry was stirred for one hour. Then, 200 ml of 0.3M Zn2+ solution was added dropwise from a dropping funnel. As the Zn2+ solution was added to the slurry, the pH of the reaction mixture dropped. The pH of the reaction mixture was adjusted to 6.2 by adding N aOH during the delivery of the Zn2+ solution. After the complete delivery of the Zn2+ solution, the slurry was boiled for one week under a N2 atmosphere. The product was washed several times with water by centrifugation. After the final washing, the stock slurry was prepared by redispersing the product well into 800 ml of water. Even this latter operation was carried out under nitrogen. An oriented film sample of the Zn2Al LDH was prepared on a glass slide for x- ray examination. About 50 mg of solid product was dissolved into 100 ml of 20% (VA!) HNO3 for elemental analysis by atomic absorption. C. Preparation of Guest Anions POMs All the guest anions were prepared according to literature methods. The details of syntheses are summarized below. B-NasHPW9O34-24H20120 : Sodium tungstate Na2W04-2H20 (120 g, 0.36 mole) was dissolved in water (150 ml). Orthophosphoric acid, H3PO4 (3 ml, 14.7M), and concentrated acetic acid (22 ml, 17.4M) were successively added to the solution. The desired white salt precipitated. a-K7PW9M02039mH20120 : B—NagI-IPW9034'24HZO (11 g, 3.9 mmole) was dissolved in an aqueous mixture of sodium molybdate, Na2MoO4.2H20 (20 ml, 1M) and HCl (16 ml, 1M). Then HCl (about 12 ml, 1M) was added dropwise until the pH was between 6 and 6.5. The desired product was precipitated by addition of solid KCl. 42 K7BCo(II)W11039-nH20121 : NaZWO4-2HZO (36.3 g, 0.11 mole) was dissolved in 150 ml water and the pH adjusted to 6.3 with acetic acid. H3BO3 (2 - 3 g, 0.03 - 0.05 mole) was added and the mixture was heated to 80 - 90°C. A solution containing 0.01 mole Co(II) was added dropwise, followed by the addition of KC] (15 - 20 g). Recrystallization from hot 2% KCl resulted in the formation of the desired product. K7BCu(II)W110390~nH2032 : This compound was prepared in exactly the same way as K7BCoW11040H2, except that Cu(II) replaced Co(II). Fibrous, clear green crystals separated from the hot solution, followed on cooling by the separation of pale green cubic crystals. q-KSSiWuO39-12H20122 : Na2WO4-2HZO (182 g, 0.55 mole) and 14.7 g of metasilicate, NaSiO3~9H20 were dissolved in 300 ml of cold water, HCl (195 ml, 4M) was added slowly, then the solution was boiled for an hour. The potassium salt was precipitated by addition of 75 g of solid KCl. 0t-l,2,3,-K6HSiV3W9O40123 : NaVO3 (5.5 g, 45 mole) and 40 g of a- NaloSiW9034o12H2O (15 mole)73 were mixed as dry powders and added to 400 ml of water at room temperature. The solution was stirred vigorously and 6M HCl was added dropwise to bring the pH to 1.5. A clear wine-colored solution developed. Solid KCl (50 g) was stirred into the solution to leave a clear solution. Methanol (1.5 L) was then added and the solution was allowed to age 60 hours, after which an orange precipitate was collected. The solid was dissolved in water at 65°C and filtered. The filtrate was cooled to 00C to form 2.3 g of an orange-brown powdered product. Purity was checked by 51V NMR. 43 K7SiFe(III)(SO3)W1 1039-91120124 : To a warm (60°C) solution of K58iFe(III)(H2O)W11O39-14H20124 (10.0 g, 3.1 mmole) in 100 ml of water was added KHSO3 (15.0 g, 0.125 mole). The solution was stirred at 60°C for 10 minutes and then cooled rapidly to 2°C. The sought salt separated upon adding 10 ml of methanol to the cold solution. It was not recrystallized. (NH4)8C02W12042o20H20126 : Na2WO4-2H2O (180 g, 0.55 mole) was dissolved in 400 ml of water. The pH of the solution was adjusted to a value between 6.5 and 7.5 by addition of glacial acetic acid. A separate solution was prepared by dissolving cobaltous acetate tetrahydrate (24.9 g, 0.1 mole) in 125 ml of warm water to which a few drops of glacial acetic acid had been added. The sodium tungstate solution was brought to boil and the cobaltous acetate solution was added to it slowly with stirring. After all of the cobaltous acetate had been added, the solution was boiled for 10 minutes and then filtered hot to remove traces of insoluble matter. The solution was heated to boiling again and 135 g of ammonium acetate dissolved in a small amount of boiling water was added to it. Upon cooling, an 85% yield of dark emerald green cubic crystals separated. The product was recrystallized from hot acetic acid (0.5 ml of glacial acetic acid per 100 ml of water). Five recrystallizations gave a product which dissolved without leaving a solid residue. (NH4)6H2W12040-14H20127 : A slurry of tungstic acid, H2WO4 (90.8 g, 0.36 mole) in 240 ml of deionized water was stirred and heated to 80 - 90°C. While maintaining temperature, 10.5 ml of NH40H (28%) was added during a period of 1 hour. Digestion was continued for 2 hours, and the mother liquor was separated from the ammonium metatungstate solution by filtration. 44 Nalonzwlzonozonzom : A solution of Na2WO4-2HZO (50 g, 0.15 mole) and Al(NO3)3-9H2O (5.16 g, 14 mole) in 20 ml water was adjusted to pH = 7.0 with 6M HNO3. A clear solution was formed after 10 - 15 minutes at the boiling temperature. The solution was filterd and evaporated on a steam bath to obtain crystals. The product was twice recrystallized and dried in air. (NH4)14NaP5W300110.3lH20129 : Na2WO4.2H20 (250 g, 0.76 mole) was dissolved in 300 ml of boiling water. 85% H3PO4 (400 g) was slowly added to it. The solution was transferred to a Pyrex glass-lined high pressure reactor, and heated to 120°C for 5 hours. After cooling, the ammonium salt was precipitated by the addition, with stirring, of 250 g of solid NH4C1. The precipitate was separated by filtration, then redissolved into 400-500 ml of warm water (60°C). The salt was reprecipitated by addition of 200 g of solid NH4Cl, then redissolved into 700 ml of water. In general, in this step, a white insoluble deposit which formed was filtered out. The clear filtrate was then slowly cooled. The white crystals which formed first were the desired product. _ K7BV(V)W11040~7H20130 : The pH of a solution containing Na2WO4-2H2O (36.6 g, 0.11 mole) was adjusted to 6.3 with acetic acid and boric acid (2.47 g, 0.04 mole) was added. The solution was heated to 80-90°C and vanadyl(lV)sulfate trihydrate (2.17 g, 0.01 mole) was added, whereupon the color changed to dark red-brown. Solid KCl was added to the hot solution and the product was crystallized upon cooling. The salt was recrystallized from a 0.5M potassium acetate-acetic acid buffer (pH = 5). (K,H)9[PV14O42]-nH20131 : NaVO3 (4.5 g, 37 mmole) was dissolved in 250 ml of hot water and 6.2 ml of 1.5M H3PO4 was added. The pH of the deep red solution was adjusted to 2—3 by 3M HNO3. The solution was warmed to 50°C, and an aqueous 45 solution at 50°C containing 10 g KCl was added slowly. After stirring, the solution was left standing overnight at room temperature to form fine black crystals. B-K6HSiW9V3O4o-3H20132 : Sodium metavanadate, NaVO3 (6.4 g, 52 mole) was dissolved in 900 ml of hor water and cooled to room temperature. To this colorless, homogeneous solution was added 8.4 ml (101 mole) of 12M HCl. This resulted in a pale yellow, homogeneous solution (pH about 1.5). This was followed by the addition of solid A-B—NagHSinO34-23HZO (48 g, 16.9 mmole) to the vigorously stirred solution. This solution rapidly developed a deep, cherry-red color as the SiW9O3410' dissolved. The resulting homogeneous solution was reacdified with 2.8 ml (33.6 mmole) of 12M HCl, bringing the total H+ added to 134.6 mmole (8.0 equiv.). Next, solid KCl (60 g, 0.8 mole) was added and the solution was stirred until homogeneous. Methanol was added until the total volume was approximately 2 L. The resulting precipitate was separated by filtration and recrystallized overnight from a hot, saturated water/methanol solution at pH = 1.5. Filtration followed by air drying at 60°C yielded 37 g of the product. The solution 51v NMR contained a single peak at -570 ppm (1 g/4 ml of D20, pH = 2.3). a—l,2,3,-K6PV3W9O40-4H20123 : NaVO3 (6.1 g, 50 mole) was added to 200 ml of 1.0M sodium acetate/acetic acid buffered at pH = 4.8. N a3HPW9034 (40 g, 15 mole) was added and the solution was stirred at 25°C for 48 hours. The potassium salt was precipitated by the addition of 30 g of solid KCl. After the solution had been stirred for 30 min., methanol (500 ml) was added to produce a precipitate which was filtered. The product was examined by NMR. NMR (31P) -13.41 ppm. NMR(51V) -566.1 ppm at pH = 1.8, 30°C. KsBW1103gan2067 : A mixture of Na2WO4.2H2O (36.3 g, 0.11 mole) and H3303 (3 g, 0.05 mole) was acidified by acetic acid to pH = 6.5. The potassium salt was 46 precipitated by addition of solid KCl. The product was filtered, washed with 100 ml of 50:50 water/methanol solution, and air dried. Bl-NagsiWnO39-nH20122 : A suspension of NagHSiW9034°23HzO (5.8 g, 2.04 mole) was added to 40 ml of 0.1M N a2WO4 solution. Slow addition of 5 ml of 1M HCl reduced the solution pH to about 6.0. This was then followed by addition of 50 ml ethanol. The oily portion was decanted and the desired product was precipitated as a white powder by addition of ethanol. Bz-K881W11039-12H20122 : Na2WO4°2HZO (182 g, 0.55 mole) was dissolved in 300 ml of water. The solution was cooled to 50C and 165 ml of 4M HCl was added Slowly. Then a solution containing 14.7 g of Na2$iO3-9H2O dissolved in 100 ml of water was added. The pH of solution was adjusted to 5.5 by adding 4M HCl. This value was maintained for about 1 hour (about 30 ml acid was needed). The potassium salt, contaminated with B-paratungstate, was precipitated by adding solid KCl. The precipitate was redissolved into water in an amount equal to 10 times the weight of salt. The insoluble salt was discarded and solid KCl was added to precipitate the desired product. The precipitate was filtered and washed with dilute KCl solution. B3-K38iW11039-12H20122 : This salt was obtained by the isomerization of B2- SiW11039-12H20. B2-K38iW11039-12H20 (30 g, 9.4 mmole) was dissolved into 300 ml of water. The pH of the solution was adjusted to 5.0 by adding HCl. After allowing the solution to age 4.5 hour at room temperature, the product, which was contaminated with (at-SiW11, was placed into water. The insoluble a-isomer was discarded. The desired product was precipitated by adding solid KCl to the clear solution. The solution was filtered and washed with dilute KCl solution. 47 D. Synthesis of LDH-POM’S The general method employed for the preparation of Zn1-xAl(OH)2 (=LDH)-POM was an ion exchange reaction. The pristine LDH-N03 was used as a starting material. The extent of the ion-exchange reaction was checked by infrared spectroscopy, which provided the characteristic bands of NO3 at 1380 cm-1 in case of incomplete reaction. All of the manipulations were carried out under a nitrogen atmosphere to prevent carbonate contamination. LDH-BW11039 : A 50 ml (5.03 mequiv.) portion of boiling LDH-N03 suspension was added dropwise to 100 ml (8.56 mequiv.) of K9BW11039 solution at pH = 7.2. The pH of the reaction mixture was maintained at 6.2 by addition of dilute HN O3. After an hour of stirring at room temperature, the product was treated as usual way, in which the product was washed with deionized water by several cenuifugations. The product was examined by ir spectroscopy and XRD. LDH-PM02W9039 : This was prepared in the same way as LDH-BW11039 except that 10.6 milliequivalents of PMo2W9039 were used. LDH-BV(IV)W11040 : A 50 ml (5.03 mequiv.) portion of LDH-N03 suspension was diluted to 110 ml and the pH was brought to 6 by addition of dilute HNO3. The boiling LDH-N03 suspension was added dropwise to 50 ml (7.5 mequiv.) of K7BVW11040 solution at pH = 5.0. The pH of the reaction mixture after 90 minutes of stirring at room temperature was adjusted to 6.0 by addition of dilute HNO3. The product was treated as above. LDH-NaP5W300110 : A boiling 100 ml (2.6 mequiv.) portion of LDH-N03 suspension at pH = 6.0 was added dropwise to 200 ml (4.08 mequiv.) of (NH4)14NaP5W300110 48 solution. The pH of the reaction mixture after two hours of stirring was adjusted to 6.2 by adding dilute HNO3 during the reaction. The product was treated as above. LDH-PV14042 : A 100 ml (2.6 mequiv.) portion of boiling LDH-N03 suspension at pH = 6.0 was added dropwise to 100 ml (2.6 mequiv.) of (NH4)9PV14042 501116011 at PH = 4.0. After an hour of stirring at room temperature, the product was treated as above. LDH-PW9034 : A 100 ml solution (7 mequiv.) of B-NagHPWgO34 at pH = 7.6 was added dropwise to 60 ml (4.1 mequiv.) of LDH-N03 suspension at room temperature. After complete delivery of PW9034 solution, the pH of reaction mixture was 7.1. Dilute HNO3 was then added to the reaction mixture to bring its pH to 6. The final pH of the reaction mixture was 5.9. The product was treated as in the other cases. LDH-SiFe(III)(SO3)W11040 : A 100 ml (3.55 mequiv.) of Fe(III)(SO3)W11039 solution at pH = 7.5 was added to 50 ml (2.51 mequiv.) of LDH-N03 suspension at room temperature. After 20 minutes of stirring, the pH of the reaction mixture was brought to 6.1 by adding dilute HNO3. The final pH of the reaction mixture after an additional 35 minutes of Stirring was 6.2. The product was treated in the usual way. LDH-a-SiV3W9O40 : A boiling 150 ml (5 mequiv.) portion of LDH-N03 suspension at pH = 6.0 was added dropwise to 100 ml (7.1 mequiv.) of K5HSiV3W9040 solution at pH = 3.0. After an hour stirring, the product was washed twice with deionized water by centrifugation. The product was redispersed into 50 ml of water and then was added dropwise to 20 ml of solution containing 0.53 milliequivalents of K6HSiV3W904o at pH = 3.0. After an hour stirring , the pH of reaction mixture was 5.7. The product was treated as usual. 49 LDH-H2W12040: A boiling 80 ml portion (8.04 mequiv.) of LDH-N03 suspensiom at pH = 6.2 was added dropwise to 160 ml (10 mequiv.) of (NH4)6H2W12040 solution at pH = 4.6. After 90 minutes of stirring, the product was washed twice with water by centrifugation. The product was redispersed into 50 ml of water and was added dropwise to 70 ml (4.5 mequiv.) of (NH4)6H2W12040 solution at pH = 4.2. After an hour of stirring the product was treated as usual. LDH-BCO(II)W11040 : A boiling 50 ml portion (5 mequiv.) of LDH-N03 suspension at pH = 6.0 was added dropwise to 100 ml (7.5 mequiv.) of K7BCoW11040 solution at pH = 6.0. After 90 minutes stirring, the pH of the reaction mixture was 6.7. The product was washed twice with water by centrifugation. The product was redispersed into 50 ml of water and was added to 100 ml (3.16 mequiv.) of BCoW11040 solution at pH = 6.2. After an hour Stirring, the product was treated as usual. LDH-SiW11039 : A boiling 100 ml (5 mequiv.) portion of LDH-N03 suspension at pH = 6.2 was added dropwise to 100 ml (7.6 mequiv.) of KgsiW11039 solution at pH = 6.3. The pH of the reaction mixture was monitored by adding dilute HNO3 during the reaction so that after 90 minutes of stirring, the pH was 6. The product was washed twice with water by centrifugation. The product was redispersed into 50 ml of boiling water and was added dropwise to 80 ml (7 mequiv.) of SiW1lO39 solution at pH = 6.3. The reaction condition was monitored by the addition of dilute HNO3 so that after an hour of stirring, the pH of the reaction mixture was 6.0. The final product was treated as usual. LDH-BCu(II)W11039 : An 80 ml (8 mequiv) portion of boiling LDH-N03 suspension at pH = 6.1 was added dropwise to 160 ml (10 mequiv.) of K3Na4BCuW11040H2 solution at pH = 5.5. After 80 minutes of stirring, the pH of the reaction mixture was 5.5. The product was washed twice with water by centrifugation. It was redispersed into 50 50 ml of boiling water and was added dropwise to an 80 ml (4.3 mequiv.) solution of BCuW11039 at pH = 5.5. After another 80 minutes of stirring, the pH was 5.8. The product was treated as usual. LDH-H2W12042 : A 50 ml (5 mequiv.) portion of boiling LDH-N03 suspension at pH = 6.3 was added dropwise to 150 ml (7.6 mequiv.) of Na10H2W12042 solution at pH = 6.2. After complete delivery of the LDH-N03 slurry to the POM solution, the pH of the reaction mixture was brought to 6.0 by addition of dilute HNO3. After an hour stirring, the product was washed twice with water by centrifugation. The product was redispersed into 50 ml of water and was again added to 100 ml (3.9 mequiv.) of H2W12042 solution at pH = 6.2. After 80 minutes of stirring, the pH of the reaction mixture was adjusted to 6.1 by addition of dilute HNO3 during Stirring. The product was washed twice with water by centrifugation. The product was redispersed into 100 ml of water and was added dropwise to 150 ml (1.1 mequiv.) of H2W12042 solution at pH = 6.2. The pH of the reaction mixture was adjusted to 5.9 by addition of dilute HNO3 with Stirring. Finally, the Slurry was treated as usual. Reaction of LDH-N03 with B-SiV3W9O4o : A 5 ml of (0.5 mequiv.) portion of boiling LDH-N03 slurry at pH = 6.1 was added dropwise to 20 ml (0.75 mequiv.) of B- K6HSiV3W904o solution at pH = 2.3. After 80 minutes of Stirring, the product was washed throughly with water by centrifugation. The exchange reaction was incomplete, as judged by XRD. Thus, the product was redispersed into 20 ml of water and was added again dropwise to 20 ml of the solution containing 0.75 milliequivalents of B- SiV3W904o at pH = 3.6. After an hour Stirring, the product was treated as usual. Reaction of LDH-N03 with a-PV3W9O40 ' : A 10 ml (0.5 mequiv.) portion boiling LDH-N03 suspension at pH = 6.1 was added dropwise to 20 ml (1.73 mequiv.) of or- 51 K6PV3W9O4O solution at pH = 3.6. After 75 minutes of stirring, the pH of the reaction mixture was 5.3. The excess of PV3W9040 was washed throughly with water by centrifugation. The reaction was incomplete, as verified by XRD. The incompletely exchanged product was redispersed into 20 ml of boiling water and was added dropwise to 20 ml of solution containing 1.3 milliequivalents of PV3W9040 at pH = 3.4. After an hour of stirring at room temperature, the product was routinely treated as usual. Reaction of LDH-N03 with BV(V)W110406' : A 15 ml (0.5 mequiv.) portion of boiling LDH-N03 suspension at pH = 6 was added dropwise to 20 ml (0.75 mequiv) of K6BV(V)W11040 solution at pH = 5. After an hour, the pH of the mixture was 5.6. The product was treated as above. The reaction was incomplete, as verified by XRD and ir. The incompletely exchanged product was redispersed into boiling 20 ml of water and was added dropwise to 20 ml of solution containing 1.2 milliequivalents of BV(V)W11040 at pH = 5.3. After an hour of stirring, the excess BVW11040 was throughly washed out with water by centrifugation. The product was examined by XRD, ir and 51V NMR. A sample for N MR experiment was prepared by dissolving the product in LiClO4 solution at pH = 2.0 Reaction of LDH-N03 with BCo(IIDW110396- : A boiling 20 ml suspension containing 0.5 mequiv. of LDH-N03 was added to a 20 ml solution containing 0.75 milliequivalents of K6BCo(III)W11039 at pH = 5.5 and at ambient temperature. After 90 minutes of stirring, the product was washed in a routine way. The excess of BCo(III)W11039 was contained in the supernatant. The pH of the reaction mixture at the end of the reaction was 6.1. The product was examined by XRD and ir Spectroscopy. Reaction of LDH-N03 with Bl-NagsiW11039 : A boiling 20 ml (0.39 mequiv.) portion of LDH-N03 suspension at pH = 6.2 was added to 20 ml (0.61 mequiv.) of 52 SiW11039 solution at pH = 6.4. After an hour of stirring, the reaction product was treated as described previously. Reaction of LDH-N03 with Bz-KSSiW11039 : A boiling 20 ml (0.5 mequiv.) portion of LDH-N03 suspension was added dropwise to SiW11039 solution containing 0.75 milliequivalents at pH = 7.6. After 30 minutes of Stirring, the pH of the reaction mixture was lowered to 6.1 by addition of dilute HNO3. After an additional 15 minutes of stirring, the product was washed with water by centrifugation. The product was redispersed into 20 ml of water and added to a 20 ml solution containing 0.63 milliequivalents of SiW11039 at pH = 6.4. After 35 rrrinutes of stirring, the pH of the reaction mixture was adjusted to 6 by adding dilute HNO3. After 50 minutes of Stirring, the final product was collected and washed in the usual way. Reaction of LDH-N03 with B3-K8SiW11039 : This reaction was carried out exactly in the same way as described for the 131-SiW1 1039 intercalate. During reaction, the pH was adjusted to 6.1 by adding dilute HNO3. E. Physical Measurements l. X-Ray Powder Diffraction X-ray diffractograms were recorded using a Philips model APD 3720 diffractometer. Ni—filtered Cu K; radiation was used as the X-ray source. Typically, thin film sample was prepared by dropping a water slurry onto either a glass Slide or a quartz sample holder, followed by air drying. For the swelling experiments, samples were prepared on ceramic plates and kept wet to maintain the spacing characteristic of the most product. 53 2. Gas Adsorption Measurement N2 gas adsorption at 77K was measured using either a Quantasorb Jr. Surface Area Analer or a Cahn electrical balance. Samples were outgassed under vacuum at the desired temperature, usually in the range 120°C to 135°C. He and N2 gas were passed through a trap maintained at dry ice temperature. Measurement performed in the Cahn balance provided data points at low p/po, which are useful especially for the micropore analysis of the material. The BET N2 surface areas were determined by the multiple point method in a p/po region where the data conformed to a linear BET plot. 3. Thermal Stability Study of LDH-POMS Oriented film samples supported on either a glass Slide or a quartz plate were heated at a given temperature for 5 hours in a Fisher Model 497 Isotemp Programmable Ashing Furnace in the open air. The heated samples were examined by X-ray diffiaction and FTIR spectroscopy. The rehydration properties were studied by soaking the heated samples in water for one day, followed by air drying. Then, these rehydrated samples were reexamined by X-ray powder diffraction. Fourier transform infrared spectra of all samples were taken using an IBM model IR 40S. All sample were prepared by the Standard KBr technique. Differential scanning calorimeu'y and thermal gravimetric analysis were carried out on a Dupont 9900 thermal analyzer under N2 purge. Temperature was ramped at a rate of 5°C/min from room temperature to 500°C. 4. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Studies A Bruker WH-180 Spectrometer was used to obtain 29Si, 51V, 31P, 11B, and 23Na at 35.77 MHz, 47.32 MHz, 72.88 MHz, 57.77 MHz, and 47.62 MHz, respectively. The WH-180 spectrometer was equipped with Nicolet NTCFT-180 computer software and a Doty solid State probe operated at the magic angle of 55°44’. In the case of solid samples, the sample spinning frequency was between 3.5 KHz and 5 KHz. TMS, VOCl3, 85% H3PO4, saturated H3BO3, and NaCl were used as references for Si, V, P, B, and 54 Na, respectively. The Na chemical Shift of NaCl was taken to be 7.7 ppm relative to the infinitely dilute aqueous NaCl solution. The chemical shifts of other references were taken to be 0.0 ppm. The solution sample derived from LDH-SiV3W904o were prepared by dissolving the intercalate in acidic (pH = 1.5 - 2) LiClO4 aqueous solution. F. Photocatalytic Reaction The pre-dispersed LDH-POM in H2O was transferred to a 45 ml of centrifuge tube and washed several times with isopropanol by centrifugation. The sample was redispersed in iSOpropanol and transferred to one of the chambers of an H-type photoreactor. The LDH-POM slurry was outgassed by pumping and refilled with Ar or 02. Photolysis was carried out with an Oriel le Hg(Xe) ozone-free lamp equipped with a 295 nm long pass filter and a water filter. The radiation was focused on the photoreactor by use of a secondary focussing lens. After 24 hours irradiation, the liquid reactant and products were separated from the solid LDH-POM by dipping the empty chamber of the H-type reactor into liquid nitrogen. After completely transferring the liquid, it was analyzed using a Varian aerograph model 920 gas chromatograph equipped with a 3 m carbopack B/3% Sp-1500 column purchased from Supelco. Helium was used as a carrier gas with a flow rate of 0.25 ml/sec. The column-, detector- and injection- temperatures were 90°C, 180°C and 90°C, respectively. A thermocouple detector was used at a filament current of 200 mA. The solid LDH-POM used in the reaction was weighed after being dried under vacuum. G. Elemental analysis Zinc and aluminum analyses of LDH-N03 or -Cl were done at the inorganic chemistry laboratory of the Department of Toxicology at Michigan State University. The analysis of the other samples was done by Galbraith Laboratories 55 H. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) Specimens for TEM were obtained by dropping a dilute slurry of the sample in water on copper grids. TEM was carried out a Jeol 100cx at the Center for Electron Optics at Michigan State University. CHAPTER III RESULT AND DISCUSSION A. Synthesis of LDH-Cl, N03 When a solution containing Zn2+ and Al3+ and C1- or NO3- counter anions with Zn/Al = 3 is precipitated at pH = 10 by the addition of OH: a LDH phase Zn2Al(OH)6A and a secondary phase are formed upon hydrothermal treatment of the gel. The second phase is either Zn5(OH)3C12 or Zn5(OH)3(NO3)2, as verified by their XRD patterns presented in Fig. 9. The ratio Zn/Al in the mixed solid product was 3. When the mixed product was redispersed in water and H+ was added to bring the pH to about 6, the second phase disappeared. That is, the second phase dissolved at this acidic condition. The excess Zn2+ resulting from the dissolution of second phase could be reprecipitated by adding OH-. When a solution containing Zn2+, Al3+ and Cl- with Zn/Al = 3 was precipitated at pH = 6, no secondary phase was formed. The Zn/Al ratio in the solid precipitate was 2. When a solution containing Zn/Al = 5 was precipitated at pH = 10 the second phase was observed again. Even a solution containing Zn/Al = 2 upon precipitation at pH = 10 exhibited the second phase. Therefore, the second phase is not due to excess Zn, but due to the coprecipitation of Zn5(OH)3A2 at a too high pH. 56 57 .mn Ensure 3 “Samoa 5-391— .8 E033 max d .mE am No v mm v 06 an omega 6.363 so “304:3 Elma Ill No A mm 3 omonn 6.568 do ca; 51394 Ill 58 B Synthesis of LDH-POMS Ion-exchange was the general method employed for the preparation of LDH- POMS. The pristine LDH-N03 was used as a Starting material. This derivative is a high crystalline material, providing a highly crystalline exchange product. Because of the low ion exchange selectivity toward NO3', the exchange reaction takes place easily. It is easy to check the extent of reaction, because the unexchanged NO3- can be detected easily by ir spectroscopy due to its characteristic N-O Stretching absorption band at 1380 cm'l, as shown in Fig. 10. When an exchange reaction is carried out, two major parameters should be considered in order to get high purity, crystalline products : l) the pH of reaction mixture 2) the reaction temperature Because LDH-N03 is amphoteric, it is stable only within a limited pH range, i.e., 5.8 < pH < 10, otherwise it will dissolve. AS discussed in the previous chapter, POMs are also generally hydrolytically unstable. However, they are quite stable within a certain pH range. The hydrolytic instabilities of both LDHS and POMs impose a restricted pH range on exchange reaction conditions. In addition to the hydrolytic instability problem, the product crystallinity can be affected by pH. In the case of LDH-NaP5W300110, in which N aP5W3oO1 1o, unlike most POMS, is hydrolytically stable even under basic conditions at elevated temperature, the crystallinity of the product obtained at neutral pH is very much ' lower than that obtained under acidic condition, as is shown in Fig. 11. Furthermore, under basic conditions, the exchange reaction of POMS does not produce a completely exchanged crystalline product. Therefore, it is necessary to keep the reaction pH acidic. The exchange reaction also depends on temperature. Exchange carried out at low temperature is always incomplete. When exchange is executed at elevated temperature, reaction occurs rapidly and completely. Therefore, it is desirable to carry out the 59 o.oov com mozin: .8 838% a .2 mm wmwmzazw>3 eoesom .2 mm @151 2mm oovl com... 1 — u 1 I - 1 d 1 I - 1 d d 1 q I and c3... ._::_::_::7 d — 1.] — q q . 3V 3 829$... 72 .oeooamammoxe 3 e5 Somamamin: a .8 «22 32 8% 28... Bow .2 mm pawmw. . 2mm 6 @Nl 2mm 0 A q d 1 a 1 ~11. . u — — q u q q —lllt Ease 8&3: 3v Sodom: 3 73 GOO—t DOV—1 geek/mania: do. «22 3.: >3 28. Bow .3 mm DON—I coo—I GOO! O00! cowl OONI O OON 001 74 the o-bond between a P atom and an oxygen atom is formed with Sp3 hybrid orbitals on the phosphorus atom. In addition to the o-bond, 1t bonding forms through participation of the p orbitals of the oxygen atoms. This rt-bond formation substantially reduces the positive charge on the P atom. Increasing the degree of 1t-interaction leads to deshielding of the P nucleus, and its resonance absorption is observed at lower field. Consequently, any interaction of the oxygen atoms with the external surroundings will influence the electron density around the P atom. This idea can be applied to the Keggin anion, PM12040, in which each oxygen atom of P04 is bounded to three metal atoms of the coordination sphere. The interaction of those atoms with phosphorus is influenced by the ability of the metal to remove electron density. Thus, oxygen atoms will Shield the phosphorus atom to different degrees. In all cases except that of M = V, the 31P NMR line is shifted to higher field, reflecting a reduction of the n-interaction in the POM. The increase of 8 values according to the sequence PW12 < PM012 < PV12 is easily understood because the electron-accepter properties increase in the series V < Mo < W. It is also known that the greater the shielding, the higher the v(P-O) frequency.64 With defect Keggin-type compounds, for example, PM11039, occurrence of a hole (defect) leads to a weakening of the PO bond and thus induces an increase in the 8 value. When the hole is filled by a cation that forms Strong ionic bonding with the defect POM, for example, Zn2+, the oxygen atoms of the hole Site are not substantially affected. Thus, the chemical Shifts are similar to those of the parent "defect Structure". On the other hand, if the hole is filled by a metal covalently bonded to the POM, the defect character is greatly attenuated, and the chemical shift approaches that of saturated Keggin-type compounds. The solid state 31P MAS NMR spectra for LDH-PMo2W9039 and K7PMo2W9039 are provided in Fig. 19. Only one peak is observed at -10.8 ppm for LDH-PM02W9039 and at - 10.0 ppm for the potassium salt of anion. The reported value for the potassium salt is -9.4 ppm.64 The chemical Shift for the LDH-PMo2W9039 is slightly lower than that of the potassium salt. The P tit-electron density in the P04 75 65959216“ 3 e8 $035828qu look. a d u it?) .o. .28.. lead. 333) Emacs: l A3 8.33:1 A. do. ”:22 a: 28. Bow .2 ma . a... ‘1‘ 76 tetrahedron has been reduced upon intercalation of the anion in the LDH gallery. Hydrogen bonding between the POM anion and the hydroxyl layer may be a source of such electronic perturbation around the P nucleus. On the basis of these NMR data, it is certain that the structures of the PMo2W9039 anions in the LDH intercalate and in the potassium salt are identical. LDH-PW9034 : The solid state 31P MAS NMR Spectra for the LDH-PW9034 and the potassium salt are Shown in Fig. 20. In the case of LDH-PW9034, there are two peaks at -13.3 ppm and at 0.4 ppm. The latter peak is due to an impurity and cannot be assigned to a POM containing a P atom. It has been observed that the size of impurity peak increases with aging. POMS containing phosphorus have not been observed to evidence such 31P chemical Shifts. The major peak at —l3.3 ppm for the LDH-PW9034 is observed at lower 8 region (higher field) than that of the corresponding potassium salt (97 ppm). The hydrogen bonding between the anion and the hydroxyl layer in the LDH gallery may be responsible for the lower 5 value, as in the LDH—PMo2W9O34 case. However, an alternative explanation is that the PW9034 anion is transformed to a phosphorus containing POM which has the same size as the parent PW9034. In this case the major peak at -13.3 ppm and the impurity peak at 0.4 ppm could arise from the POM containing a phosphorus atom and the phosphate anion, respectively. The hydrolysis of the PW9034 anion in the gallery proceeds to some extent by aging. The latter argument is more plausible than the former. On the basis of the LDH-PW9034 ir data, which will be discussed in the next section, the LDH product formed from the PW9034 anion resembles that formed from PW9+xO34+y (0 < x < 3). LDH-PV14042 : The solid state 31P MAS NMR spectra for both LDH-PV14042 and (NH4)9PV14042 are given in Fig. 21. Both spectra exhibit only one peak at -1.25 ppm for the LDH-PV14042 and at -1.38 ppm for the ammonium salt. The Similarity of these spectra suggests that the anion under the two different circumstances is identical. 77 8363.582 3 .88 enemies: 6.. 822 3.2 E m 2.8 Bow .8 mm ham“... . . ml .JWW. oofil G 3mm . 1 . . l _ . .14 593.6 Ended... 3V Eanm.3 .. any 78 -1.3 - . (a) PPm (b) l 1 4PPm L) . J . .21 2 PPM ° -20 PPM 0 --20 Fig. 21. Solid state 31P MAS NMR for a) LDH-PV14O42 and b) (NH4)9PV14042. 79 LDH-BW11039 : Boron atom has a spin 3/2. Thus, it has an electric quadruple moment which will lead to line broadening. The 11B solid state MAS NMR for both LDH- BW11039 and K9BW11039 are provided in Fig. 22. The spectrum for the potassium salt of the BW11039 anion shows a typical powder pattern containing a peak doublet. In this case, the quadruple interaction Still contributes to the line broadening due to the asymmetric environment around the central B atom (Cs symmeu'y). Therefore, even though the Spectrum was obtained by the MAS technique, its Shape still shows appreciable line broadening. On the other hand, in the case of LDH-BW11039, the spectrum contains a much more narrow single line at ~17.3 ppm. The reported chemical Shift value for the BW120405' anion in solution is -17.6 ppm relative to a saturated solution of boric acid.134 Such a narrow single line indicates a highly symmetric environment around the B central atom in the BW11039 anion. Consequently, line broadening due to the quadruple interaction will vanish. The highly symmetric environment around the central B atom upon intercalation was indicated in the ir spectrum. Split bands assigned as v(B-O) due the low symmetry environment around the B atom in the potassium salt merged into one single band at 985 cm"1 for the intercalated anion in LDH. The number of ir absorption bands for the potassium salt (Cs symmetry) has been found to be greater than that for the intercalated anion, as given in Fig. 32. The increased symmetry of the anion may be due to the filling of the vacancy in the defect Keggin structure with a group which may come from the hydroxyl layer (e.g., OH) LDH-NaP5W300110 : The solid state 23Na MAS NMR spectra of both LDH- NaP5W300110 and the ammonium salt are given in Fig. 23. These Spectra also Show a typical powder pattern. The similarity of the two spectra suggests an identical anion structure under the two different circumstances. The Slight line broadening that occurs upon intercalation may be due to a less symmetrical surrounding around the Na nucleus due to shift of the Na atom out of the central position in the POM. The shift in Na+ 80 - 17.3ppm M —22.2ppm - 19.2ppm (a) (b) g l l I l L l 4 l l L I L 10 25 10 25 Fig. 22. Solid state 118 MAS NMR for a) LDH-BW11039 and b) K9BW11039. 81 2.: cm: A: AgmamhzzAamzv A. 8. A: Aeomamhzioq A. a. «22 3.2 .23 a... Bow .3 mm 2... 2mm Li . d 1 - d H N J 1 [— J u T J 82 position may arise because of interaction of the POM with the hydroxyl layer in the gallery. For instance, H-bonding may result in an increase in the electric field gradient around Na nucleus. Thus, the quadruple interaction will be increased and the line will be broadened. The solid state 31P MAS NMR spectra of both LDH-NaP5W300110 and the ammonium salt of the POM are provided in Fig. 24. Since both Spectra Show a Single peak at -9.8 ppm for LDH-NaP5W300110 and at -9.7 ppm for the ammonium salt, it is obvious that the POMS in the different environments are identical. 5. Infrared Spectroscopic Studies The ir Spectra of LDH-POMS should consist two main components. One should be the contribution of the host layer, which is a layered octahedral metal hydroxide lattice. The other should be the contribution of the guest POM anion. a) Vibrations of the host layer Information on the octahedral layers can be obtained from lattice vibrations. In principle, these vibrations can be assigned to the translational motions of the oxygen layers. A vibrational study of layers having the composition M(II)2M(III)(OH)6 was done by Sema et 31.135 They assumed that the layer had ideal D3d symmetry. Under this assumption, seven it active modes, namely, 3A2u + 4B“, are possible. Only five vibrations (2A2u + 3Eu) can be observed above 250 cmrl. Within the frequency range accessible with our IBM-40 FI‘IR instrument, that is, above 400 cm-1, only three bands are observable. The most distinctive band, a M(II)-O-M(III) stretch, occurring in the range 460-410 cm-1 is dependent on the metals occupying the octahedral interstices. For example, a Strong band is observed at 435 cm-1 for Ni2Al(OH)6.l/2CO3, 455 cm-1 for Mg2Al(OH)6-1/2CO3 and 430 cm-1 for Fe2Al(OH)6-1/2CO3. For our Zn2Al(OH)6-NO3 system, the band is observed at 427 cm-1. The other two bands for Zn-O-Al stretching occur at 678 and 558 cm-1 as shown in Fig. 10. The other type of layer contribution is a 6(OH) vibration at about 620 cm'l. 83 -9.8pprn ‘9-7PPm (a) (b) gawk. - J O -; PPM O 20 PPM 20 Fig. 24. Solid state 31p MAS NMR for a) LDH-NaP5W3OOl 10 and b) (NH4)14NaP5W300110. 84 b) Vibrations of guest POM anion Ir spectroscopy is extensively used in polyoxometalate chemistry for structural elucidation. Especially, the vibrational spectra of Keggin structured POMS (XM12040) have been extensively studied by Rocchiccioli-Deltcheff et al..135 As discussed in the introduction chapter, the (rt-Keggin structure consists of one X04 tetrahedron surrounded by four M3013 (M3 triplet) sets formed by three edge-sharing octahedra. These structural features are illustrated in Fig. 25. Theoretically, there are 22 it active modes.135f) These modes belong to vibrations of the T2 type. In view of the complexity of this anion, many vibrations may not be observed on account of either random degeneracy, low intensity of the bands, or occurrence beyond the measurable range limit. Three major groups contribute to the POM spectrum, namely, the 12 terminal M=Od bonds, the 24 bridging M-O-M bonds and one central XOa4 tetrahedron. In the bridging M-O—M groups, there are two types of bonding in the bridging M-O-M groups: 12 almost linear M-Oc-M "intra" bridging bonds135b) contained within four M3 triplets : 12 bent M-Ob-M "inter" bridging bonds connecting the four M3 triplets to each other. The band due to the M=Od group occurs in the 1100-900 cm-1 range. For example, the band v(W=O) is observed at 935 cm‘1 for H2W120406', 960 cm'1 for BW120405', 982 cm-1 for SiW12O404- and 985 cm-1 for PW12O403’.136 d) The valence vibrations of the second M-O-M group (symmetry C2v) are observed in the range of 900 - 200 cm“ 1. Three bands can be observed, namely, the symmetric and asymmetric valence vibrations vasy and vsy and one deformational vibration 8 when vasy > vsy.137 In general, two bands at 920 - 850 cm-1 and 800 - 750 cm-1 are assigned to the antisymmetric valence vibrations of M-Ob-M and M-Oc-M, respectively. The latter band is usually Strong. The vibrations of the tetrahedral X04 group in the anion appear in the region of 1100 - 800 cm-1 (A1 and T2) and 600 - 400 cm-1 (E and T2). Only three with T2 symmetry are ir active modes. They include two vibrational modes v3 and V4 which 85 O. 0. ‘- O... . ob “XM12 0, (X141. b Fig. 25. Idealized structures of (rt-XM12 (Keggin structure) (a) and or-XMll (defect Keggin Structure) (b) (the central XO4 tetrahedron is not shown). (Oa = oxygen Shared by 3 M06 octahedra and the x04 tetrahedron, ob and 06 = oxygen linked to two different M atoms, Od = terminal unshared oxygen). 86 represent a stretching and a deformation morion, respectively. In general, v3 > v4. Table 12 provides the vibrational frequencies of the most frequently occurring XO4. Table 12. Vibrational Frequency of XO4.135 d) X B Si Ge P As M W W Mo W Mo W Mo W Mo v(cm'l) 920 930 910 815 802 1080 1070 915 900 x x x 460 460 598 598 472 472 x: Complicated bands in the region of 500—530 cm-l. Except for X = P, the X-Oa band assigned as vasy(X-Oa) often has a discussed shape. It is rather broad because of band mixing with v(M-Ob-M). In the case of X=P, vasy(P- 03) is well resolved from other bands, thereby providing an accurate assignment. In the case of a lacunary Keggin structure, XM11039, the symmetry will decrease from Td to Cs. The decrease in symmetry will result in band broadening and the splitting of degeneracies, thereby increasing the number of bands. However, such splittings do not take place as much as expected.135 CLC) A general decrease of Stretching frequencies is observed on account of a weakening of the anion cohesion. In particular, the strong band around 800 cm-1 attributed to vasy(M-Ob-M) is split into two bands at 797 and 725 cm-1 for SiW11039 and into two bands at 810 and 725 cm-1 for PW11039. For the PM11039 anion, vs(P-Oa), which is well separated from the other bands of the spectra for PM12040 as explained above, is split into two components. The two bands occur at 1060 and 1040 cm-1 for PM011O39 and at 1085 and 1040 cm-1 for PW11039. This splitting is also due to the symmetry decrease of the P04 tetrahedron. When a lacunary POM XM11039 forms complexes of the type XM11M’O39, in which M’ are the 3d series ions, A1111, SnIV or BIII , the ir Spectra of these complexes Show that the ligands retain a structure related to the Keggin structure.135 6) Complexation always induces an increase in stretching frequencies, but the shifted 87 frequencies remain lower than the frequencies observed for XM12040. This increase shows a strengthening of the anion cohesion and an opening of bridge angles relative to those of the free ligand, because the du-p,t interaction of the M-O-M bond is enhanced by increasing the bridge angle M-O—M. In the case of PM11039, the v3 P04 splitting value, Av, is always lower than that of the free ligand. Therefore the filling of the vacant site by an M’ atom restores to some extent the symmetry of the central tetrahedron, owing to the interaction between the M’ and 0a atoms.1356) When a XM11039 degradates further to XM9034, the symmetry changes from Cs to C3v. The general decrease of stretching frequencies is also observed when XMle4o changes to XM11039. For example, v(W=Od)s are observed at 985 cm’1 for PW12040,135 d) 950 cm-1 for PW11039135 C) and 931 cm-1 for PW9034.137 Furthermore, v(P—Oa) decreases in the same way ; 1080 cm'1 for PW12040,135 d) 1085 and 1040 em-1 for PW11039,135 c) and 1056 and 1002 em-1 for a-PW9034.138 When some of the tungstens in the XW12040 Keggin Structure are substituted by M0 or V, for example, SiW12-xMoxO40 (x = 1 - 3), their ir spectra are intermediate between that of SiW12040 and that of SiM01204o, without the appearance of new bands due to the decrease of the molecular symmetry.135 d) The band around 800 cm-1 attributed to v(M-Ob-M) still remains discussed without Splitting as is observed for SiW1204o and SiM012040. The detailed description of the ir spectroscopic features of each LDH-POM will be presented below (cf. Table 13). However, a few general conclusions will be provided first. Generally Speaking, when POMs are intercalated into the gallery of the LDH, their ir bands shift either to higher or lower frequencies. Rocchiccioli-Deltcheff has disscussed the influence of counterions on the vibrational spectra of POMS in the solid State.135 b) He defined two opposing effects, labelled effect A and effect B. The former leads to an increase in the Stretching frequencies, for example, v(M=Od), with respect to the reference spectra (effect AS) and a decrease in the vibrational frequency for the bending 88 motion of the bridging M—O-M (effect Ab), whereas the latter leads to an decrease in the the stretching frequencies. For example, the anion-anion interaction belongs to effect A and hydrogen bonding belongs to effect B. Therefore, the band shifts will be determined by these two competing effects. When effect A is predominant, a blue shift will result in v(M=Od). When they contribute equally, there will be no band shifts. Generally speaking, in this work, red Shift of vagy(M=Od) for the POMS in the gallery were observed most commonly due to the predomination of hydrogen bonding between M=O in POMS and the hydroxyl group in the host layer. The size of the POMS in the gallery can be calculated by subtracting the thickness of the hydroxyl layer (4.8 A) from the basal spacings of the LDH-POMS determined from the XRD data. The size of the intercalated Keggin type POM is about 9.6 A to 9.8 A, which is smaller than that obtained for POMs (10.4 A) in crystallographic Studies.135b) This observation strongly suggests that the interaction between the guest POM and the host hydroxyl layer is strong. Such a Strong interaction causes d-spacing contraction, with resulting stabilization of POMS in the gallery. Most POMS except PV14042 are Stable in the gallery even in boiling water. In this latter case, a blue shift of the v(V=Od) band was observed when the compound was in the gallery. This blue Shift arises from the predomination of the anion-anion interactions in the gallery. These interactions cause an increase in the potential energy of POM network, thereby increasing the vibrational frequency. In fact, PV14042 is not a keggin structure but is a derivative, having two more V=Od units located on opposite Sides of the C3 axis of the original Keggin Structure as Shown in Fig. 26. The distance between these two V=Od is about 13.4 A.139 The resulting shape resembles a football. The long axis is about 13.4 A and the Short axis 10.4 A. The PV14042 ion is oriented in the gallery so that the long axis is parallel to the hydroxyl layer. Such orientation will result in a decrease of the distance between POMS, thereby enhancing the anion-anion interaction. 89 "Q i‘ Fig. 26. The polyhedral model of the PV140429‘ anion. 90 In order to explain the anon-anion interaction in the gallery, we define a new quantity, the average distance between the POMS in the gallery. This quantity is obtained on the basis of the hexagonal array of the POM in the gallery. Its detail will be discussed in the other section. In the case of PV14042, which has a football like shape, the average distance is 13.2 A, which is smaller than the longest axis (13.4 A) and larger than the shortest axis (10.4 A). Thus, two neighboring POMs can be oriented so that they can contact each other. Rocchiccioli-Deltcheff et a1135 b) reported that the interaction would be effective if the distance between POMS is less than 6 A. Therefore, the perturbation will Spread over the POM framework. This anion-anion interaction results in unusual behavior, such as the instability of POMS in the gallery at high temperature in water, its thermal instability in the solid state, and a blue shift of the v(V=Od) band on intercalation. c) Vibrational Study of LDH-POMS The details of each system are discussed below. All band positions with their assignments except those for NaP5W3oO110 and LDH-NaP5W300110 are listed in Table. 13. LDH-H2W12O4o6- : When H2W12040 is intercalated into the LDH, it experiences two opposing effects, that is, effect A and effect B as discussed above. In this case, effect B is predominant, inducing a red Shift (about 11 cm-l) for the band assigned as v(W=Od), even though the average distance between the POMS in the gallery is Short enough (10.7 A) to promote a effect A. The ir Spectra of POMs under the two different surroundings are shown in Fig. 27. There is also a red shift of v(W-Oc-W) from 760 cm‘1 for the NH4+ salt to 757 cm:1 for H2W1204o in the intercalated State. The red Shift of this band is due to the effect Ab and effect B, as was pointed out by Rocchiccioli-Deltcheff.135 b) The unlisted bands are 8(OH) at 620 cm‘1 and v(Zn-O-Al) at 427 cm‘l. LDH-BVW110407- : In this complex there is almost no observable Shift for v(W=Od) even though the average distance between the POMS in the gallery is 11.6 A. Therefore, 91 Table 13 Infrared Spectral Data of Free-POMS and LDH-POMS Compounda Assignmentfi vas(X-Oa)9 vas(M=Od) v(M-O-M) (NH4)6H2W12042 - " 936 ‘ 901, 871, 760 LDH-H2W1204o - 925 895, 7 57 11 K7BVW11040 990, 908 947 885, 811. - 693. 673 LDH-BVW11040 998, 905 949 807, 695 -2 668 K5HSiV3W904o 1007 915, 965 782, 634 - LDH-SiV3W9O4o 1003 913, 959 780 e a-KSSiW11039 995 960 891, 799 - 728 LDH-SiW11039 1001 955 791, 762 5 7 15 K7PM02W9O39 1082, 1046 945 897, 855 - 1033 811, 734 LDH-PMo2W9039 1081, 1050 946 803, 745 -1 KgBW11039 995, 917 954 884, 870 - 836, 811 788, 751 7 19 LDH-BW11039 985 939 896, 786 5 783, 716 K7BCuW11O39 987, 907 940 875, 810 - 711 LDH-BCuW11039 986 937 897 , 807 3 7 10 K7BCoW11O39 984, 912 940 885, 820 - 775 LDH-BCoW11039 984 937 897, 815 3 782 K7SiFe(SO3)W11039 996 953 885, 797 - 727 LDH-SiFe(SO3)W11039 1000 952 903, 784 1 7 16 B-NagHPW9034 1055, 1014 936 882. 819 - 748 LDH-PW9034 1083, 1057 947 809, 685 -11 92 Table 13 continued (NH4)3C02W12042 - 937' 885, 790 - 75 , LDH-C02W12042 - 917 872, 787 20 735, (NH4)9PV14042 1060 938 867, 810 - 810, 770 LDH-PV14042 1057 943 805, 757 -5 (NH4)10H2W12042 - 950, 934 871, 861 - 765, 699 LDH-H2W12042 932 863, 798, e 702 DJ Hydrated waters were omitted for simplicity and the data for (NH4)14NaP5W300110 and LDH-NaP5W300110 are not listed because of the ambiguity of band assignments. Their band positions are in the text. b Band assignments were done only for three characteristic vibrations modes of POMs. 0 Frequency unit is cm'l. d Avis obtained by substracting v(M=Od) of free POM from that of LDH-POM. e Details are in the text. 93 .ovofiaamiaa Ea 802%chsz 2 co 808... a .R .5 mammzzzw><: oov com com cco« coma l Nvm.o llov.o Flom.o l I lich.o l omh.o Iv'lllnl' .91 ll SONVllINSNVHl 96 cow .ovoaamzmin: a Ea 9.083536%: 2 co «58% a «a .3”. mammzazm>>Hum in: a e: emo2 £6212 2 ca 88% 2 .mm mm mmwmznzw> v(XM11039) > v(XMgO34).135°)»c) From consideration of the band positions, it is plausible to suggest that the anion in the gallery is stabilized by forming a XM11M’O39-like surrounding. The band broadening in the 1000 - 650 cm'1 region, which corresponds to the v(M-O—M) range, may be attributed to such an unusual surrounding of PW9034 in the gallery. As shown in Fig. 36 the differences in the ir spectra of the anion under the two different circumstances are easily recognizable. The unlisted remaining bands are 8(OH) at 620 cm‘1 and v(Zn-O-Al) at 565 and 428 cm‘l. LDH-C02W120423' : In this case, the B effect is remarkably predominant so that v(w=od) shifts from 937 cm-1 in the NH4+ salt to 917 cm-1 in the intercalated anion. There are also red shifts in v(W-Oc-W) bands as in the other cases. Remaining bands include unassigned bands at 520 and 488 cm-1, 5(OH) at 625 cm’1 and v(Zn-O—Al) at 103 oov .802 2389222 a 8a 302 568$. 22 .8 88% a .8 .mm mmwmxnzm>_mtntmoo oo omx o 0.9. 0.0.. 0.00 0.00 1P P by P * r P «moo .m.oo .moo e2.oo 8881331831883; DVQNW—‘OOOO 0.00 0.0— 0.0a 0.0 1P 0 + 0 I 1. tr hmoo no.0. ‘IOVMNN-OOQOO amen no.8. «moo mo.— $8889888988 — 0 0 0 I 0 I 0 121 layers contained within the double parentheses correspond to the t0p and bottom oxygen sheets of the POM in contact with the oxygen sheets of the brucite layers. Each oxygen sheet consists of eight oxygen atoms. With B—POM, either of the oxygen sheets from the POM consists of only six oxygen atoms. This six oxygen atom sheet is not commensurate with the hydroxyl group of the brucite-like layer, resulting in higher d—spacings, e.g., d(LDH-a-SiV3W9O40), 14.4 A; d(LDH-B~SiV3W9O40), 14.8 A. The reduced contact area between the POM and the LDH layer also makes the B-isomers’ ion exchange tendencies less favorable. When one of the six oxygen atoms, which initially define the top or bottom faces of the POM, is removed from the B-lZ-Keggin structure, it results in the same sequence with LDH-B3-SiW11039. The mismatching of the oxygen layers is vanished, so a favorable stacking is resulted as in the LDH-a-POM. The ion exchange behavior of B3-SiW11039 is similar to that of a-isomer. Therefore, complete exchange occurs with the b3 isomer. Its d-spacing also changes to a lower value (14.4 A) as in the a-isomer intercalates. However, the other two B-l l-isomer intercalates result in the same sequence with the B-SiV3W9O40 intercalate. Thus, only partial exchange occurs with these isomers. 3. Orientation of Keggin-Type POMs in the Gallery As seen in Fig. 8, the structure of the a- and B- isomer of SiV3W9O40 contain three vanadium atoms located adjacent to each other. Rotated M3 triplet unit is located on the opposite side. The ion exchange behavior difference between a- and B-isomers described in the previous section indicates that the orientation of the Keggin-type POM in the gallery must be such that the a- and B—isomers can be differentiated. There are two possible orientations, i.e., either C3 or C2 axis is orthogonal to the LDH layer. As discussed previously, the most possible orientation is one in which C2 axis is perpendicular to the LDH-layer. Therefore, in LDH-SiV3W904o C3 axis is tilt along 0 direction. Such an orientation will be extended to other systems such as a- and B- 122 isomers of ll-Keggin structures. These have been already discussed in the previous section. In para-tungstate, H2W12042, there are two M3 triplets on opposite sides connected by two other types of units, as shown in Fig. 14. On the basis of the XRD study (d001 = 14.1 A) these two M3 triplet must directly contact the brucite layer. The oxygen layer stacking arrangement of the whole system approximates rhombohedral symmetry even though two M3 triplets are not exactly superimposed, but are shifted by about half an oxygen perpendicular to the direction connecting two M3 triplets. In the case of PV14042, whose structure is shown in Fig. 26, there are two more V=O units than in Keggin-type POMs. These V=O units are located along the C2 axis of the PV12040 ion. On the basis of both commensuration of the oxygen sheets of PV14042 in the brucite layer and d-spacing consideration ((1 = 14.4 A) the orientation of this ion must be different from those of the other Keggin-type POMs. Therefore, the C2 axis connecting the two extra V=O units is parallel to the brucite layer lattice. The compound NaP5W300110, whose structure is shown in Fig. 15, is oriented in the gallery so that the C5 axis of molecule is perpendicular to the brucite layer, as judged from the observed d-spacing (d001 = 21.3 A). This orientation provides the maximum contact between the brucite layer and NaPsW300110 and the minimum d- spacing. With PW9034, whose structure is shown in Fig. 7, there is only one way to explain the observed d-spacing (d001 = 14.5 A), a value almost the same as those of the other Keggin-type POMs. The face, which is formed by removing three W02 units, and the M3 triplet face located on the opposite side of this face are not contacting the brucite layer. In other cases in which one W=O was replaced by Mn+(O, H20, or 803), where M is Cu(II), Co(II), V(IV), or Fe(III), their gallery orientations are uncertain. But with BCo(II)(I-I20)W11039, there was a color change from pinkish to greenish during the 123 heating of the sample under vacuum. This phenomenon is reversible. There is no d- spacing change during the dehydration process. This color change indicates the coordination number of Co(II) has changed from six to live. This type of color change in related molecules has been observed during removal of coordinated water in homogeneous solution by azeotropic boiling or by blowing hot nitrogen tluough their solid samples. 141 From the above observations made on LDH-BCo(II)W11039, the side of the ion containing such coordinated water in the POM frame must not be contacting the brucite layer but must be positioned in the middle of the gallery. E. Thermal stabilities of LDH-POMs Generally speaking, LDH-POMs are stable up to 200°C even though their thermal Stabilities are dependent on the POMs in the gallery. Both LDH-H2W12042 and LDH-PV14042 are exceptional cases, because neither is thermally stable even at low temperature. They undergo degradation of POMs in the gallery, resulting in unassignable XRD patterns. When samples are heated at certain temperatures, water molecules occupying the free space between POMs in the gallery are removed from LDH-POMs. As the water molecules are removed, their XRD patterns are also changed. Both the relative intensities of peaks and their peak positions are affected by dehydration. In general, the relative intensity of the 001 reflection increases, while the other 001 reflections decrease in intensity as the heating temperature increases. Specially, the relative intensity of 002 reflection decreases much more than those of the others. Peak broadenings are also observed as temperature increases. The higher the charge on the POM in the gallery, the greater the changes in the XRD patterns upon heating. When samples are dehydrated at temperatures where they are stable and then rehydrated by soaking in water, XRD peak positions and relative intensities are reestablished, even though absolute intensities are not regained. A slight decrease in d-spacing of the dehydrated sample is generally 124 observed. Such changes result only from the change water content in the gallery. The dehydration and rehydration process are reversible even though the rate of rehydration is dependent on the POMs in the system. Differences in scattering contributions of water molecules is the source of changes in XRD intensities. When water molecules are removed, there is no water contribution to peak intensity. When the system is rehydrated, the water contribution is restored. In order for the water molecules to contribute to the XRD pattern of system, they should be positioned regularly in the gallery. In the rehydrated system the water molecules reoccupy gallery positions equivalent to those for an unheated sample. Therefore, the same type of XRD pattern as that observed for an unheated sample is obtained. The following noteworthy observations for LDH-POMs are summarized : 1) the higher the charge of the POM in the gallery, the more the XRD peaks are broadened, 2) the XRD pattern upon dehydration and rehydration processes is reversible, 3) upon dehydration the d-spacin g decreases, 4) the calculated surface areas and pore volumes for systems containing POMs with more than 9- charge are much larger than the observed values. Layer nonrigidity will result in layer sagging when LDH-POMs are dehydrated. The higher the charge of POMs in the gallery, the greater distance between the POM pillars and the more the layer will sag. When systems with sagged layers are rehydrated, the layer will reswell much like the swelling of a sponge. The decrease in the absolute intensities of the XRD peaks comes from the decrease in the regularity of the lattice array, which arises partially from layer sagging. Severe layer sagging may result in bond breaking in the layer network. Such partial bond breakings will also give rise to a decrease in the crystal size, which, in turn, will result in both peak broadening and a decrease in peak intensity. When such fractured crystals are rehydrated, bond reformation does not occur. Therefore, complete recovery of absolute peak intensities is not observed. 125 When LDH-POMs are heated at about 500°C, new inorganic phases appears. The only assignable major phase is a ZnWO4 type phase which appears for all complexes except LDH-PV14042, in which the only a Zn2V207-type phase can be identified. The thermal stability of LDH-POMs is discussed below. LDH-H2W12040 : This complex is stable to 180°C, and samples heated below this temperature can be rehydrated. XRDs at different temperatures are shown in Fig. 44. By 225°C, the decomposition of H2W12040 has occurred. The ir spectra in Fig. 45 and the XRD study shown in Fig. 45 verify the decomposition temperature. Only one unidentified peak at 26 = 6.9 remains in the sample heated to 225°C. The ir pattern of this sample becomes simpler below 1000 cm-1 and structure due to POM frequencies is no longer observed. The peak at 426 cm-1, which is attributed to an Al-O-Zn stretching motion, disappears after heating this temperature. An amorphous phase is observed up to 450°C. At 470°C, crystalline inorganic phases appear. TGA and DSC data indicative of phase changes upon heating are shown in Fig. 46. The dehydration processes occur up to 216°C, followed by layer dehydroxylation up to 354°C. An exothermic peak starting at 446°C corresponds to the formation of new inorganic crystalline phases. LDH-SiV3W9040 : This complex is stable up to 220°C. As shown in Fig. 47 rehydration of the heated sample is possible. The POM SiV3W9040 decomposes at 250°C, as verified by it spectroscopy and XRD data. The ir spectrum, presented in Fig. 48, shows a reduction in the number of bands below 1000 cm-1 and disappearance of the 428 cm-1 band due to the degradation and disappearance of both the POM and the hydroxyl layer upon heating. Therefore, the Zn-OH-Al lattice network is absence. There are only two detectable XRD peaks at 29 = 6.560 and 19.03° in the 220°C specimen, but these peaks cannot be related each other. Therefore, more than one unidentifiable phases must exist. An amorphous phase is observed below 450°C. The shape of ir 126 Fig. 44. XRD pattern of LDH-H2W12040 at different temperatures. a) 25°C, b) 120°C, c) 180°C: dotted line for the rehydrated sample, solid line for the dehydrated sample, d) 225°C, e) 320°C and f) 470°C 127 18.25 Dogs 12800 Cnts 18.14 009: 4547 On ts a4 '59 0’” 25.0 37.14 0093 2433 Cat: 30.78 Dogs 713 Cnts ‘34 L i.ee' 0.81‘ 0.64* 049‘ c.3s‘ 0.25‘ 0.16‘ 039* 0.04‘ 0.1m 3) XRD of LDH—HZWRO“ at 25°C m 1.001 0.01‘ 0.641 0.491 0.361 0.25‘ 0.16‘ 0.091 0.04 0.011 30.0 45.0 b) XRD or LDH-H.150, at 12% 33.0 128 rehydrated — rvv fimn 30 ' 35 4o 45 50 C) XRD of LDH-Htwuo. at IBO'C and rehydrated. ”3 L 1.001 0.31‘ 0.044 0.491 6"" “9‘ 0.361 0.25‘ 0.16‘ 0.091 0.041 0.0r* LN‘ 0.81‘ 0.641 0.49 0.3 0.231 0.161 0.091 0.0M 0.01‘ 1 v I T 1 V V 23.0 30.0 38.0 40.0 d) XRD of LDH—3,1! 0 at zzs-c 1040 129 19’ ‘ 1.001 0.81‘ 0.641 9-‘9‘ 7.28 Doss 0.36‘ 0.25" 0.161 0.09‘ 0.04‘ 0.011 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 1.00 0.81 0.641 0.49‘ 0.36‘ 0.251 0.161 0.091 0.04‘ 0.011 T Y Y Y Y T Y 1' 1' 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 e) XRD or LDH-HJuo“ at 320‘C t0" 1 - 3.00‘ 1.62‘ 1.201 0.981 0.72‘ 0.50‘ 0.32‘ 0.18‘ 0.08‘ 0.021 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 2.001 1.621 1.201 0.90 0.724 0.501 0.321 0.:01 0.00‘ 0.024 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 60.0 65.0 70.0 1') XRD of LDH-mluoa at 47o-c 130 $8882“an 828:0 um 9.02 gaming .8 2.8% a .9. .wE mammzzzm>_m-me .«o 880%. h .3 .wE mmmmxnzm>>oum+~a mo «58% .: .% .wE 149 mammxazm><3 0cm com ocw« N ./ 0.3m ” v 063 u m 0.93 n m 9mm u H Fich.o mvn.o BONVLLIHSNVHL 182 only one absorption band centered at 855 cm'1 without the band around 427 cm‘l, which is attributed to the Zn-OH-Al lattice vibration. Thus, species in an amorphous region do not contain an Al-O-Zn network. The DSC and TGA of LDH-BW11039 are provided in Fig. 70. The dehydration process occurs up to 208°C, followed by dehydroxylation of the hydroxyl layer up to 342°C. At 450°C new crystalline inorganic phases appear. LDH-C02W12042 : This system is stable to 180°C. Rehydration of sample heated to 180°C is possible as shown by their XRD pattern in Fig. 71. At 225°C, The ir spectrum provided in Fig. 72 shows that LDH-C02W12042 decomposes at 225°C. There is only one absorption band centered at 841 cm-1 as in the other cases. Its XRD pattern shows only one unidentified peak at 20 = 6.90. At 320°C It becomes completely amorphous, as shown in its XRD pattern. The ir spectrum of this amorphous material below 1000 cm-1 shows only one absorption band centered at 856 cm'l. At 500°C new crystalline inorganic phases appear. The DSC and TGA of LDH-C02W12042 are provided in Fig. 73. Dehydration occurs up to 223°C, followed by dehydroxylation of the hydroxyl layer up to 356°C. At 450°C new crystalline inorganic phases appear. LDH-PW9034 : When this complex is heated even at 110°C, its XRD pattern shows remarkable peak broadening , as shown in Fig. 74. However, there is no substantial difference in its ir spectrum from that of an unheated samples shown in Fig. 75. Thus, it is obvious that heating causes no structural change in PW9034 in the gallery by heating. The XRD peak broadening mainly originates from the layer sagging as discussed in a previous section in this chapter. Such a broadened XRD pattern is observed for the 215°C heated specimen; peak broadening is so severe that it is difficult to locate peaks. Rehydration is possible even though recovery of XRD pattern is very slow. Heating at 320°C causes it completely to an amorphous phase. As in the other cases, the ir spectrum below 1000 cm-1 shows a typical single band centered at 852 cm-1 below 1000 183 .22 gain: 8 <09 Ea 0mm .2 .5 AOL 0539—2—38. com 03.. 8a SN 2: c b h b P b D p P *oOII on A r we 1 T ndl r .4 an L h. W. . r Nd! m 8 1 r 1 . _ 23:.“ 3.23.334 Ill? 0025 I r «6... 035m 20 1. 2: L 030305 a. :3 r 03 (I/‘) no” 1003 Fig b)1. 8311‘ 184 Fig. 71. XRD pattern of LDH-C02W12042 at different temperatures. a) 25°C, b) 120°C, c) 180°C: dotted line for the rehydrated sample, solid line for the dehydrated sample, (1) 225°C, e) 320°C and 1) 500°C. .1371 1.00‘ 0.91‘ 0.64‘ 0.49‘ 0.36 0.251 18.33 0095 4516 Cnts 12.13 Dog: 1704 Ont: 0.16‘ 0.09‘ 0.04‘ 0.01 24.58 Doss 1004 Cnts 5.0 10.0 15.0 1.001 0.011 0.641 0.491 0.301 0.251 0.161 0.091 0.041 0.011 37.25 0095 38.83 0090 785 Cnts 288 Cnts 25.0 I if 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 3) XRD of LDH—CoJuO. at we ‘ '1...) A 5.001 4.051 3.201 2.451 1.001 1.251 0.001 0.451 0.201 0.051 I 5.001 4.051 3.201 2.451 1.88‘ 1.251 0.001 0.451 0.201 0.051 18.39 009: 3768 Ont: 5.0 10.0 15.0 37.33 0090 586 Ont: 38.97 0095 191 Cnts 45.0 b) XRD of LDH—Coyuoa at 120°C 186 rehydrated T5 2' “0 25 cm pa 0 ‘ 30 35 46 is C) XRD of LDH-COW O at 180°C 01:. 1L xlB' 1.00‘ 0.81‘ 0.64+ 6.90 0.93 0.49‘ 9.3.1 W 0.25‘ . 0.16‘ 0.09‘ 0.04‘ 0.01* 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 1.00‘ 0.81‘ 0.64 0.49‘ 0.36‘ 0.251 0.161 0.091 0.041 0.011 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 d) XRD of LDH-CoJuO. at 225’C 203 l .001 .81‘ .64‘ .49‘ .36‘ .25‘ 0.16‘ 0.09‘ 0.04‘ 0.01‘ 00000“' 187 7.46 009: 1.08‘ 0.81‘ 0.64 0.49 0.25‘ 0.16‘ 0.09‘ 0.04‘ 0.01‘ 5.0 15.0 9.36% v v v 5 v V V " 25.0 35.0 e) XRD 01 LDH-CoJuO. at. :3sz 2.00‘ 0.90‘ 0.721 0.50‘ 0.32‘ 0.18‘ 8.881 0.021 10.0 41.38 0093 40.0 f 65.0 I I 45.0 55.0 60.0 W I 10 0 XRD of LDH—Co 0, at 50% 188 oov 3580983 82850 “a NvONH 390-33 mo «88% A .Nh .wE mammzszm>>nn—az-mn: .«o «beam u— .5 .wE coma BONVLLINSNVHL 208 two peaks at 20 = 5.20 and 10.40 remain. These may be assigned as the first and second order peak , respectively. At 250°C, this specimen turns into an almost amorphous phase even though a trace of the LDH-NaP5W3oO110 phase remain apparent in its XRD pattern. Its ir spectrum shows evidence of structural change in the NaP5W300110 in the gallery. New crystalline inorganic phases appear at 500°C. The DSC and TGA of LDH-NaP5W300110 are given in Fig. 82. The dehydration process occurs up to 176°C, followed by dehydroxylaton of the hydroxyl layer up to 322°C. An exothermic peak starting at 466°C corresponds to the onset of new crystalline inorganic phase formation. LDH-H2W12042 : This compound is moderately thermally unstable even at low temperature. The XRD pattern of this complex heated at 120°C shows a decomposed phase, as evidenced in Fig. 83. The decomposition of this complex is also easily verified by ir spectroscopy, as illustrated in Fig. 84. A decomposed phase is observed even at 120°C, and the complex turns to an almost amorphous material at 230°C. At 320°C the material is completely amorphous. Its ir spectrum shows one typical simplified absorption band centered at 856 cm"1 as do other complexes. At 500°C new crystalline inorganic phases appears. The DSC and TGA of LDH-H2W12042 are provided in Fig. 85. The dehydration process occurs up to 230°C, folloWed by dehydroxylation of the brucite-like layer to 355°C. At 500°C new crystalline inorganic phase appears. F. Adsorption Study of LDH-POMs The LDH-POMs can be classified according to the charges of POMs in the gallery. The N2 adsorption isotherms of the representative LDH-POMs are shown in Table 14. Fig. 86 shows the N2 adsorption isotherms, providing the isotherm type and the BET (N2) surface area. The shape for the first four LDH-POMs, type 1, indicates that 209 .2 Somanaazia .8 <09 us. own .3 .5 AOL 3332—38. com. 8.. can 8m 2: OD b p p p — 8M - P . on" at no 8. fl . M. J «an a» w. 8 .. m 8.5.. 0338.35 8 1 on. E 83... T .5 .52. on: I.— 297:3 are. oo— N I O (3/1) mu wan 210 Fig. 83. XRD pattern of LDH-H2W12042 at different temperatures. a)25°C, b) 120°C, c) 180°C, (1) 230°C, e) 320°C and 500°C. 211 12.56 Doss 18.92 Deg: 25.33 Deg O A O A A A O A 3858383333 OOOOOOOPO‘N A A 5.0 ' 10.9 15.9 20.0 25.9 x103 L 5.00‘ 4.05‘ 3.20‘ 2.43‘ 1.00‘ 1.25‘ 0.00‘ 0.45‘ 0.20‘ 0.05‘ 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 a) XRD of LDH-Hyuoa at 25°C 18.14 0033 8.52 0093 5.001 4.05 3.20‘ 2.45‘ 1.00‘ 1.25‘ 0.00‘ 0.45‘ 0.20‘ 0.05‘ .0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 b) XRD of LDH-Hyuo, at. izo-c .1 5.88‘ 4.051 3.291 2.45‘ 1.881 1.25‘ 9.991 9.451 9.291 9.95‘ 1212 18.51 Dogs 9.13 009: 5.99* 4.95‘ 3.29‘ 2.45‘ 1.99* 1.251 0.804hhIflIdIflUUflIUI‘*""-th~.h-I~'l~.~F- 00‘5‘ A‘-———vvv~, 9.29‘ 9.951 5.0 10.0 15.0 37.57 0098 30.0 x103 L 1.00‘ 0.011 0.64‘ 8.491 0.361 8.251 0.161 0.091 0.04‘ 0.01‘ V f V 35.0 C) XRD of LDH-H.Wu0‘ at IBO‘C 40.0 50.0 1.00‘ 0.011 0.64 0.49‘ 0.361 0.25‘ 0.161 0.09‘ 0.04‘ 0.01‘ 45.0 50.0 (1) XRD of LDH-HJuO‘. at. zao-c .193 l 2.991 1.62‘ 1.281 8.98‘ 8.72‘ 8.581 8.32‘ 8.181 8.88‘ 9.921 2123 2.00‘ 1.621 1.281 0.50‘ 0.321 0.181 0.001 0.02 312W 9.191 80.38‘ 9.9.21 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 e) XRD of LDH-Hfiuo.’ at azo-c 23.66 0093 24.38 0093 18.75 0095 38.49 0093 .90‘ 0"~N no 3 .991 19.721 9.591 9.321 9.191 9.991 9.921 3.9 19.9 15.9 36.34 0093 37.82 003: 41.21 0093 ”5.0 1) XRD of LDH—Hfluoa at soc-c 214 oov .mouafioafie 820% 3 $03 397:3 .«o «88% h .vw .mE mmmgdzm><3 cow GOD coca Damn _ h F _ — P _ . — 1113.“.0 «.2 /. m T .\ Tlom 0 r1 “Io-YO T . .18 o T UoONm u .v H. 0.2: u m 12.... v.93 u m n UomN u .n T «no.6 BONVLLIHSNVHJ. 215 80233;: “o <0... Ba 08 .2 .5 AOL . 83.-3A3: 8m 8.. 8» 8m 2: a WP — K n p n r - *oo.‘ . 0.3“ . 0.3 u t on 1 r. fl.°.| . 0.0mm nol . I . I N . 1 N61 m a. co L . 19 MW . L 0.00m 92% "Yvon 1 “6! no 1 . Tl 32$ 323.354 I+III cad—E. can 1 03m woaomaoeoa r ed . 25.933 P r 03 «d (I/‘) no“ “on 216 .mZOmiS .«0 8850mm conga? NZ .3 .wE '3 A23 .. o Em, om\a 0.. ad L who . no . who one WED? ..1 11.1 .11.” z: o 1 $8 1.6.: om \ gaunuoalumu ... . :88 11°55 _ 9. T 9119111191 1 u H .. om . Gm: 16.-9% w 1 11111111111 9 I? r8 roe. 1Naaaosov do 5/0001 x W 217 Table 14. LDH-POM Intercalates for N2 Adsorption Studies. POM Isotherm Type Surface Area BET N2(m2/g) H2W1204o6- I . 63 SiV3W9O4o7- I 155 SiW110398- I 211 BW1 10399- I 96 PW90349- II 26 H2W12042“). II 15 NaP5W3001 1014‘ II 3 218 (ssawonm 11131151111191!) 1 P/Po Fig. 87. T-curvc of LDH-Cl. 219 these systems are microporous materials in which the pores are nearly filled at low p/po. These have relatively high surface areas compared to the other three LDH-POMs whose adsorption isotherm shapes are type II. The latter type II isotherms are typical for nonporous materials. One of lowest adsorptions capacities was observed for LDH-Cl, which is a reference nonporous material used for the t-curve analysis, which is provided in Fig. 87. The pore volumes of the porous LDH-POMs were obtained from either a DA or D-R plot and a t-plot. These are shown in Appendix B. All t-plots have the same shape. Such sharp transitions in the t-plot curves indicate that each system has a unique pore size. It can be said that POMs are uniformly distributed in the gallery, thereby providing an unique pore size. G. Theoretical Calculation of Surface Area and Pore Volume Certain POMs can be intercalated in LDH galleries, thereby providing free space in the gallery. The available extra space or area can be estimated in the following way. Here only LDH-POM in which POMs have the Keggin structure are considered. The general chemical formula of LDH-POMs is [Zn2A1(OH)6]nPOMn-, where n is1th‘e negative charge carried by POM. The following quantities are defined : 81 = area of anA1(OH)6 surface in the absence of'any gallery ion Sc = maximum cross area of POM The free area created by the intercalation of one molecule of POM in the gallery is equal to nS1 - Sc. The molecular weight of [Zn2A1(OH)6]nPOMn' is equal to 260n + MpoM, where MPOM is the molecular weight of the POM. Assuming that l) the host layer is perfectly rigid, 2) the repulsive interaction between POMs in the gallery is free and 3) the POM is spherical with 2r = d(gallery height) = 9.6 A. Then, 220 S(m2/g) = 6.0 x 103 x {n81 - (ud2/4) }/(260n + MPOM) --(1) The calculated values for selective systems including observed ones are tabulated in Table 15. Here, the equation (1) should be greater than zero, Therefore, n81 - 1td2/4 > o n > 4.4 Since the area occupied by the POM in the gallery should be less than that provided by the LDH layer (n81), the above result implies that the minimum charge of a POM with Keggin structure to be intercalated is 4.4. Because of the integrality of molecular charge, the minimum must be 5. However, in this calculation the free area includes all the area available regardless of the size and shape of the free area. For more precise calculation, the assignment of the POMs in the gallery should be taken into account. The most efficient array of the POMs in the given area is a hexagonal one. When the POMs are closely packed hexagonally, the line connecting the nearest three POMs will make an equilateral triangle with an interstice in the center. The area of this equilateral triangle is equal to 0.433 d2, corresponding to one half of the area given to one POM. Thus, the area given to one POM is 79.8 A2 for d = 9.6 A, This area consists of the area occupied by one POM as well asthe area of the interstice. When the area n81 given by the LDH layer is equal to that given to one POM (2 x 0.433 d2), the POM molecules in the gallery are most efficiently arranged, so maximum POM number is accommodated by the host layer. Thus, n81 = 2 x 0.433 d2 For (1 = 9.6 A and 81 = 16.5 A2, 11 is equal to 4.8. In reality, the POMs with 5- charge have not been completely exchanged into the gallery, but only partial exchange has been observed. The observed minimum charge for the complete exchange reaction is 6-. This discrepancy arises from the oversimplification 221 of the above model. If the repulsive interaction between POMs is considered, the van der Waals radius would increased, and the calculated minimum charge would be greater than 5. From the above derivation of the minimum charge carried by POM, the average distance between the POMs in the gallery can be also obtained. For the simplicity, let’s take the minimum charge is 5-, which corresponds to a value obtained using (1 = 9.8 A and the area given to a POM 83.2 A2. As n increases from 5- to 6-, the given area to the POM also increases proportionally. Thus, the resulted area is 99.8 A2. Now, the quantity (1 corresponds to the distance between the POM. Therefore, 2 x 0.433 d2 = 99.8 d is equal to 10.7 A. In the same way, the following distances can be obtained for the othernvalues : n =7, d= 11.6 A; n = 8, d =12.4A;n =9,13.2A;n=10,13.9A. The free volume can also be estimated in a following manner. The free space generated by the intercalation of one molecule of POM is V, expressed as below, where the symbols and definitions have the same meaning, except that dis again a d-spacing. V = (d x n81) - volume occupied by a POM ----- (2) If the shape of POM in the gallery is assumed to be spherical and if the pore volume (Vsp)is expressed as a ml/g unit, then v = vSp = 0.6{16.5nd -( rtd3/6)}/(26On + MPOM) ----- (3) If the shape of POM in the gallery is cylindrical with height = d(gallery height) and cross area = So, then v = vcy = 0.6[16.5nd - (M3/4) }/(260n + MpoM) ----- (4) 222 All calculated pore volumes are tabulated along with observed values in Table 15. As the charge, 11, on the POM increases, the calculated pore volume and surface area also increase, because the lateral distance between POMs in the gallery increases. However, the denominators in both equation (3) and (4) also increase with increasing charge. The contribution of the weight term does not change the trend of calculated values : the higher the charges of POMs in the gallery, the larger the surface areas and pore volumes. The observed values of surface area and pore volume increase as the charge on the POM increases only in the range of n = 6 - 8. When n reaches 9, all the values abruptly decrease. Therefore, the maximum value of surface area and pore volume is observed at n = 8. The largest difference in the absolute value between the observed and calculated ones occurs at n = 8. The structure of the POM at n = 8 is no longer a Keggin structure, because one out of 12 W required in the original Keggin structure is missing. The reduction of the lateral diameter of the pillaring POM will contribute extra space in the gallery and result in larger observed than calculated values of both surface area and pore volume. The big drop in observed surface area and pore volume at n > 8 probably results because one of the assumptions made in the calculation does not hold. The assumption of perfect layer rigidity is not realized in these systems. Imperfect layer rigidity results in layer sagging after the zeolitic water in free space is removed prior to the gas adsorption. Such layer sagging will result in a reduction of the free space, thereby blocking the adsorbate from reaching the gallery space. The dependence of layer sagging on the POM charge densities also is observed in the case of POMs having the same total charge but different size. For the n = 9 case, the 9- charges are delocalized on 39 oxygens in BW11039 and on 34 oxygens in PW9034. Therefore, the charge density of the former is lower than that of the latter. The higher charge density and small size of the latter will cause greater layer sagging than the lower charge density POM. The dependence of layer 223 mg 38 o o em room Saw. a 3.3.: 25 ed: New 2:. - 8 «.2: Saw a sofa «.2. m2: at. 95 :m :3 SE m sodzm Ch 98 98 36 3“ ~83 8mm N. 3395 3a «.8 «.8 31m 8 max. 2.3 m seat: 88 x :9 ..> 1> _ €> Swahmua; BEE 2233 _..> _ ..> 1m 3m 3.: e .. 2cm ”83> 8.285 as. 93 88983 80 N2 .2 23¢ 224 sagging on charge density is also observed in the XRD data for both systems heated at temperatures employed for the adsorption studies. These XRD patterns are in Fig. 68 (c) and Fig. 74 (b). As the charges of POMs increased further, observed values decreased. The details of layer sagging will be discussed in the other section. The pore volumes calculated on the basis of a cylindrical model are closer to the observed values than those based on a spherical model. Since nitrogen used as an adsorbate in the adsorption study has a finite size, there are dead spaces that nitrogen molecules can not reach. Thus, a cylindrical model, in which the volume occupied by POMs will include some of such dead spaces, will be more realistic than a spherical model, in which the dead spaces are not taken into account. G. Photoreactivity of LDH-POMs Following the scheme of Hill for classifying POM photoreactivity in homogeneous solution, we can classify LDH-POMs by the visual changes which occur during the photoreaction. Class I : This category of LDH-POMs neither develops any color change even under Ar nor yields any significant photoproduct. The yields are so low even under 02 that in some cases product production is below reasonable limits of detection. The LDH-POMs containing transition metals are in this category. For example, LDH-SiFe(SO3)W11039, LDH-BCuW11O39, LDH-BCoW11039 and LDH-Con12042 belong to this class. Class II : This category of LDH-POMs changes its color to mostly blue under Ar. The original colors are not completely recovered when the reduced LDH-POMs are exposed to air. Even after several days there is still slow recovery of the original color, but complete recovery is not achieved. The LDH-POMs containing V(V) and Mo(IV) belong to this category. Thus, when photoreactions are carried out even under Oz, color changes are developed. In the catalytic cycle, the rates of reoxidation of the reduced LDH-POMs 225 are very slow compared to those of Class III. LDH-PV14042, LDH-SiV3W9O40 and LDH-PM02W9039 belong to this category. Class III : This category of LDH-POMs changes its color from mostly white to blue under an argon atmosphere. When these blue-colored forms are exposed to the air, their colors change back to the original white color. When photoreactions are carried out under O_2_, no color change develops. Therefore, the catalytic cycle, which involves reduction of LDH-POM by organic substrates, formation of a blue colored LDH-POM and reoxidation of the LDH-POM by Oz, is completed without appearance of a color change. For example, LDH-NaP5W300110, LDH-H2W12042, LDH-SiW11039, LDH- PW9034, LDH-H2W1204o and LDH-BW11O39 are in this category. The photoreactivities of LDH-POMs for the oxidation of isopropyl alcohol are summarized in Table 16. The general trend of photoreactivity in Class III complexes is that the higher the charge on the POMs in the gallery, the greater the reactivity. As discussed in the previous section, the higher the charge on the POM in the gallery, the more free space available between POMs. Therefore, it can be said that the more spaceous the gallery, the more reactive is the system. In the case of LDH-NaP5W300110, the increase in gallery height provides more space compared to LDH-POMs of the Keggin-type. Therefore, for the Class III systems, the greater the free space within the gallery, the higher the photoreactivity. This observation is contradictory to Fox’s result in which the higher the charges or the larger the sizes of POMs, the lower the reactivities. The photoreactivities of LDH-POMs have been observed to be very much different from those of homogeneous POM solutions. It has been claimed that a pre-association complex formation between the organic substrate and POM should precede photoactivation and that the photoreactivities depend on the Stabilities of these complexes. The rate of formation of the pre-association complex in the LDH-POM will be dependent upon the mobility of the organic substrate within the free space in the gallery. It is certain that the 226 .. .. 1 p .6me .. 1 .. a seaflou I 3 1 a. 3°...»on 1 a." 1 s acasqomvoam 1 m.“ .. a sea: 3 an ed A. so..>>m me as m.“ N. scion.“ 3. 9o 3 x. 6.39% 1 2: 1 e 9.333.: 3 an ad 8 Jim ca 98 am a aesfim 3 h: 5. a sea?— . ed at 3 3 most... 3 «.3 9.5 3 sedan—92 . 2\.o am .2 0328 :8 non—8:: 325:2 ”Semis do 32383. 3828.2.— .2 2.3. 227 more spaceous the gallery is, the faster the organic substrate will travel through it. Therefore, higher reactivity will be observed in the high charged system containing a large POM rather than in a low charged system with small sized POM. The increased space also facilitates diffusion of products from the reaction site out of the gallery. The ability of product to leave easily minimizes back electron transfer from the reduced POM to product or other transient species. Therefore, both easy access of reactant and easy leaving of product in the gallery make the system well suited for high photoreactivities. Fox has also claimed that the photoreactivities of POM depend on the heteroatom of the POMs, as well as on their reduction potentials. The same observation has been made for the LDH-POMs. For example, the following order of photoreactivity was observed : PW9034 > H2W1204o > SiV3W9O4o > C02W12042.. Therefore, the photoreactivities of LDH-POMs depend on the electrochemical properties of POMs, as in the homogeneous solution. When the photoreactivities of LDH-POMs under Ar are compared with those under Oz, the highest ratio of (turnover # under Oyturnover # under Ar) is observed in LDH-H2W12040. A trace of product was produced under Ar, while under 02 a large quantity of product was obtained as shown in Table. 16. The behavior of this system shows that reoxidation of reduced POM in the gallery by 02 is highly efficient even though the total yield is lower than that in other systems which have more free space in the gallery due to the high charge of POM, e.g., LDH-H2W12042. Therefore, this system illustrates that the photoreactivities of LDH-POMs associate strongly with the electrochemical properties of POMs. The LDH-POMs in which boron is a heteroatom are very photochemically unreactive compared to those in which P is the heteroatom. Class I system shows almost no photoreactivity, perhaps because insufficient number of photons is available to carry out photoreaction on the W-O centers due to the high absorption of photons by the transition metals. 228 H. Swelling Properties of LDH-POMs It is known that LDH-A intercalation compounds, in which A is a general inorganic anion, do not swell in any solvent. However, LDH-Or derivatives, in which Or is an organic anion, for example, alkyl sulfate, can be swelled by polar organic solvents, as was mentioned in the introduction. The LDH-POM derivatives show unique, but limited swelling by water, in contrast to the conventional LDH-A. Wet samples of LDH-PV14042 and LDH- NaP5W300110 were examined by XRD as shown in Fig. 88. There were two phases present in each sample. One phase gives a high d spacing corresponding to the swelled phase, the other exhibits a low d-spacing, corresponding to the non-swelled phase. The differences in d-spacings of the two hydrated phases in LDH-PV14042 and LDH- NaP5W300110 are 1.5 A and 2.3 A, respectively. These values correspond to one and two monolayers of water, respectively. This unusual swelling property of LDH-POMs can provide insights into the ion exchange mechanism for LDH-A with POMs and will be discussed later. 1. Proposed Mechanism of Ion Exchange Reaction. Three important observations can be used to support a mechanism for the ion exchange reaction of LDH-N03 with POMs. First of all, the ion exchange reaction takes places only in neutral or acidic solution. Secondly, the LDH layer is not strictly rigid. Finally, LDH-POMs can be swelled over a limited range, for example, 1 - 2 monolayers of water, whereas LDH-N03 is not swellable. ’ LDH layers have broken edge sites in which the aluminums are coordinatively unsaturated. Such edges may have chemical property similar to those of aluminum hydroxide whose colloidal particles carry positive charge at acidic and neutral condition and negative charge at basic condition.37 Therefore, negatively charged POMs will electrostatically interact with positively charged edges of LDH layer at acidic and neutral 229 Fig. 88. XRD pattern for wet samples of 1) LDH-PV14042 and 2) LDH-NaP5W300110. —___...-— m...“ 4 _ mafia... So: .eo..>n_1:3 do omx 2 230 ‘l 41 1r o- q an 3 3‘———=: ON - 12 VN J cu 231 vacuum 33 1“ O N p .6: osfimmzéfi do omx a @N c— ON VN 0N «.3 a... «a. q 232 conditions. It is obvious that the interaction will be stronger with highly charged POMs than with lower charged POMs. POMs will consequently bind to the edge of the layer. Exchange of N03 with edge-bound POMs will take place. Once POMs replace NO3 at the edge of the layer, two phases coexist. One is a LDH-POM phase and the other is a LDH-N03 phase. The LDH-POM is the only swellable phase and thereby only it can provide sufficient space for easy access of incoming POMs into the gallery to replace N03. The flexibility of the LDH layer helps the whole system accommodate two different phases in the same gallery. As the reaction proceeds, the LDH-POM phase extends toward the center of the particles and the exchange reaction becomes more favorable because the preformed LDH-POM phase will help the exchange reaction to proceed due to the swellability of this phase. Consequently, the LDH-POM phase plays the role of a catalyst by facilitating the exchange reaction. 233 Appendix A: XRD pattern of LDH-N03 and LDH-POMs at 25°C. -a) LDH-N03, b) LDH-H2W12040, c) LDH-BV(IV)W11040, d) LDH-BCoW11039, e) LDH-BCuW11039, f) LDH-SiFe(SO3)W11039, g) LDH-SiV3W9O4o, h) LDH- PM02W9039, i) LDH-SiW11039, j) LDH-BW11039, k) LDH-PW9034, l) LDH- Con12042, m) LDH-PV14042, n) LDH-NaP5W300110 and o) LDH-H2W12042. 234 «moo oo.om 621%: do omx a 0.00 o.nm 0.0n 0.0m «moo oo.~o nooo n..om «moo oo.o_ TO~.O rnv.0 vow-O .nm.— .00." .Dv.~ .ON.M .00.? .Oo.n .no.o .o~.o .nv.o .00.0 .nm.— .3.— .nv.m .o~.o fino.r roo.n d VO—x 235 1| .JO‘ 18.25 0093 “63‘ 12809 cm: ;.ae* ‘3-93‘ 12.14 begs 2:22, 4547 cm: 3450 Does 0.32‘ 0.18‘ 0.02‘ 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 0.50l 0.18l 713 Cnts 0.08‘ Oooal 264 L‘* c.90‘ 1.62‘ 18.44 0095 1.88‘ 10646 Cnts 0 98 12.19 0095 2.00‘ 1.28‘ 0.98i 0.?2‘ 0.50. 37.44 0093 0.32‘ 30.97 009: 2345 Cut: 0.181 0.08‘ 0.02 c) XRD of LDH—BV(IV)W“O” at 25°C 8 62‘ C «0‘ l 2.06‘ 1.62‘ 1.88‘ 0.981 8.721 0.581 0.32‘ 6.184 0.08‘ 0.02 236 17105 Cnts 8.44 0093 24.67 Dogs 2998 Cats 6.19 009: 149 Cnts 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 37.44 0093 3623 Cnts 31.03 0093 762 Ont: 30.0 35.0 45.0 50.0 (1) XRD or LDH-BCo(II)W“O‘. at. 25'C 18.44 0093 10184 Cnts 2.00‘ 1.62‘ 1.28‘ 0.981 0.72‘ 0.501 0.32‘ e) XRD or LDH—BCu(II)Wuo, at 25'C 237 5.00' 18.31 Doss 4.851 35415 Cats 3-80‘ 12.14 0.9. 2"5 16959 Cnts 34-56 0093 11674 Cats 0.451 6.03 0.93 °°3°l 431 Cnts 5.9 19.9 I 15.9 . 29.9 25.9 "8°‘ 37.19 0.9. 030. 38.86 0.9, 6889 Cuts 01‘5‘ 2230 Cnts 0.20 9.951: “‘ r ,-A’“L—, . ‘A‘ggj=ncnnpnA=xatyuhnun;¥L-‘:aq_____~. 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 1) XRD of LDH—Sirearrxsogwno, at 25'C x104 P 1.80‘ 18.44 009: 9-91‘ 12.19 0.9: 006‘T 0.491 24.61 Dogs 8.36‘ 8.23‘ 8.16‘ 3.991 6.88 0093 0.04‘ "-212 - : 0.01 ' 5.9 19.9 15.9 29.9 25.9 1.991 9.911 9.641 9.491 . 8.36‘ 9.251 9.161 9.991 9.941 “:—~;:‘“*‘ "‘1“" 0.01‘ 30.0 35.0 40.0 43.0 50.0 9) XRD of LDH-Sivawpw at 25°C 238 1-63‘ 12999 Cnts 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 h) XRD or LDH-PMon. at 25°C 2.08‘ 18.25 0095 1162l 12993 Cnts 95°. 37.880095 9.321 3°16? 0'9” 2173 Cuts 0°19‘ 939 Ont: 9.991 9.921 39.9 35.9 49.9 45.9 59.9 i) XRD or LDH—Siwno. at. 25'C 23S) <10 Som‘ 3'23: 18.50 009: 2:45. 21727 cm. 1.991 1.251 9.991 9.451 9.291 9.951 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 5.00‘ 4.05‘ 3.20‘ 2.451 1.80‘ 1 :2:1 37.44 0095 9.451 31.93 0.9. 3195 ents 0.20‘ 62? Cats 0.05 30.0 35.0 40.0 43.0 50.0 j) XRD of LDH-ewuo, at 25-c 1.00‘ 10.33 009! 9.251 12-19 0059 24.53 0.9. 1.36‘ 37.15 0093 3.25 ‘ 33082 0.16‘ 0.09 ‘ __:‘_¥ 3': “ {Aw - Wr- 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 k) XRD of LDH-P119“ at 25-c 240 .19 1.901 0.91‘ 10.33 0093 0.64‘ 4516 Cnts 0.491 0.36‘ 0.25‘ 0.16‘ 0.09‘ 0.041 0.01‘ 5.9 19.9 15.9 29.9 25.0 1.001 0.81‘ 9.641 9.491 0.361 9.251 0.16‘ 9.991 0.041 0.011 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 1) XRD of LDH—Co W O at 25‘C . I 10 4| __l l l I l L l l L l L 1 L _. 3O 26 22 18 14 10 6 29W m) XRD of LDH—PV 0 at 25°C 14 42 ~10 00 .81 49 36 16 .09 04 .01 QDOOQQ-XJQO” 0.81‘ 0.64 0.49 0.36 0.25 0.16 241 25.99 0.9. 12.44 Dog. 16-58 005: 6922 this 5001 cm. 5092 CMS 20.81 0993 3318 Ont: 8.33 Dogs 4. 19 °°9s 1194 Cnts . 689 Cnts 29.36 Dogs 33.69 Dogs 38.03 s 867 Ch 1: DOS 9-09‘ 473 Cnts 473 Cnts 0.04 0.01 x104 2.00 1.62 1.28 0.98‘ .9.72 0.32 0.18 0.08 0.02 2.00‘ 1.62‘ 1.28 0.90 0.72 0.50 0.32 0.18 0.08' 0.02 .u_dhAuz3qHFF-V~JNA20JNA41fiv¥fi¥~VV‘ ' v v 1% 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 n) XRD of LDH—Nainnom at 25'C 1* 12.56 begs 18.92 [>er 25.33 023 6.28 0935 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 31.75 Dogs 38.33 Dogs 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 0) XRD of LDH—H3120“ at 25°C 242 Appendix B: T-plots and D-R or D-A plots of LDH-POMs. a) t-plot of LDH-H2W1204o. b) D-A plot of LDH-H2W1204o. c) t-plot of LDH-SiV3W904o. (1) DA plot of LDH-SiV3W904o. e) t-plot of LDH-SiW11039. 1) DR plot of LDH-SiW11039. g) t-plot of LDH-BW11039. h) D-A plot of LDH-BW11039. 243 O— scaafiéa 26 33613 A. 3825.5 ..A]60'I 24S Jazmin; no 33¢ a $825.5 20.5.25 .3 a o m n N o L L p — . - p h o .. [up 1 [em 1 1mm r r 0 19 r r .. row T 91: odmnaaoopmfi: 1.. b r L . P FNN .LNBEHOSCIV :10 5/OOOL x M 246 3.5/5&3 no 83 «In a 3% w n m P - . _ p Fawnvgguaoopfis _ . P p b p b F [Iw OOOL x (M1501 247 odp soaémuma Ho “can. .0 5825.5 20.5.25 é . own one _ ow ca P h b P T a mfihnummoumas _ b b I b! b P row 00— lNBBHOSGV 50 5/OOOL x M 248 «6:35:34 no 83 mun c -<- «Afixvuw m I-N III-q— as??? ”3808:. on.— Tom.— 16¢.— 10m.— Immé 1mm.— CON [Iw OOOL x (M1601 249 o— aofimlma no 030.... a 55025:: 20.5.25 .3 0 0 0 . ¢ 0 0 - F - P b b h b o \‘il‘ thnaamoumfi: maaaosov .40 5/OOOL X It» 250 30:31:00 3 83 <10 A. . 3..» m . P o -n _ _ . 0: [1w 0001 x <'>A]60'1 8.001.031.3083“: «0.. P D P b D I 99°F? 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. References Barrer, R.M.; Mcleod, D.M., Trans. Faraday Soc., 1955, 5_l_, 1290. Mortland, M.M.; Berkheiser, V.E., Clays Clay Miner., 1976, _2_4, 60. Shabtai, T.; Frydman, N.; Lazar, R., "Preceeding of the 6th International Congress on Catalysis" (1976) London, The Chemical Society, London, 1977, 660. Knudson, M.I.; McAtee, J.L., Clays Clay Miner., 1973 21, 19. Trynor, M.F.; Mortland, M.M.; Pinnavaia, T.J., Clays Clay Miner., 1978, _2_§, 319. Brindley, G.W.; Sempels, R.E., Clay Miner., 1977, 1;, 229. Yamanaka, S.; Brindley, G.W., Clays Clay Miner., 1978, 26, 107. Lahav, N.; Shani, U.; Shabtai, J., Clays Clay Miner., 1978, 2Q, 107. Vaughan, D.E.W.; Lussier, R.J., "Preprints, 5th, International Conference on Zeolitesz, Naples, Italy, 1980, June 2-6. Brindley, G.W.; Yamanaka, S., Clays Clay Miner., 1979 Q, 830. Ocelli, M.L.; Tindwa, R.M., Clays Clay Miner., 1983, 3_1, 22. Cheng, S.; Peng, G:W.; Clearfield, A., Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev., 1984, 23, 219. Dines, M.B.; Griffith, P.C., J. Phy. Chem., 1982, §§, 571, Dines, M.G.; DiGiacomo, P.M.; Callahan, K.P.; Griffith, P.C.; Lane, R.H.; Cooksey, R.E., in "Catalytically Modified Surface in Catalysis and Electrocatalysis", J.S. Miller, 1982, ACS Symposium Series 192, Washington, DC.. Taylor, H.F.W., Miner. Mag., 1973 22, 376. Miyata, S.; Kumura, T., Chem. Lett., 1973, 843. Brown, 6.; Gastuche, M.C., Clay Miner., 1967, Z, 193. Kwon, T.; Tsigdinos, G.A.; Pinnavaia, T.J., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1988, 119, 3653. 251 19. 20. 21 . 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 252 Fordel, C., Amer. Min., 1941, 26, 295. Allmann, R.; Lohse, H., Neues Jb. Miner. Monatsh, 1966 161. Ingram, L.; Taylor, H.F.W., Min. Mag., 1967, 26, 465. Taylor, H.F.W., Min. Mag., 1973,. 22, 377. Allman, R., Acta Cryst., 1968. B_2_4_, 972. Feitchnecht, W., Helv. Chem. Acta, 1942, 25, 555. Gastuche, M.C.; Brown, G.; Mortland, M.M., Clay Miner., 1967, Z, 177. a) Miyata, S.; Ikada, A., Clays Clay Miner., 1977, 25, 14. b) Miyata, S., Clays Clay Miner., 1980, 22, 50. c) Miyata, S, Clays Clay Miner., 1975, 22, 369. Roy, D.M.; Roy, R.; Osborn, E.F., Am. J. Sci., 1951211, 337. Taylor, R.M., Clay Miner., 1984, 12, 591. . Bish, D.L., Bull. BRGM. (2), 1978, 298. Miyata, S., Clays Clay Miner., 1983, 11, 305. Glaeser, R.; Mering, J ., CR. Hebd. Seanc. Acad. Sci., Paris, 1968, 261, 436. Norrish, K., Trans. Faraday Soc., 1954, E, 120. Bradley, W.F.; Grim, R.E.; Clark, G.F., Z. Kristallogr. Kristallgeom., 1937, 22, 260. a) Hendicks, S.B.; Nelson,R.A.; Alexander, L.T. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1940, 62, 1457. b) Mcakenzie, R.M, Clay Miner. Bull., 1950, 1, 115. Hendicks, S.B.; Jefferson, M.E., Amer. Miner., 1960.23, 863. MacEwan, D.M.C., Clays Clay Miner., 1960, 9, 431. van Olphen, H., " An Introduction to Clay Colloid Chemisu’y" 2nd Ed., Wiley, New York, 1977. Norrish, K., Discuss. Faraday Soc., 1954, g, 120. Squet, H.; De LA Callie, C.; Pezerat, H., Clays Clay Miner., 1975, 22, 1'. 40. 41. 42. 43. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 5 1. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58 59. 61. 253 Dosch, W.; zur Strassen, H., Zement—Kalk-Gips, 1967,29, 392. Boehm, H.B.; Steinle, J.; Vieweger, C., Angew. Chem. Intd. Ed. Eng, 1977, _1_§, 265. a) Weiss, A., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 1963, 2, 134. b) Lagaly, G., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 1976, 15, 575. Brindley, G.W.; Kikkwa, S., Clays Clay Miner., 1980,28, 87 Miyata, S.; Okada, A., Clays Clay Miner., 1977, 25, 14. Miyata, S., Clays Clay Miner., 1975, 28, 369. Rouxhet, P.G.; Taylor, H.F., Chimia, 1969, 23, 480. Miyata, S.; Kumura, T., Japan, 7,329,478 ; Chem. Abst., l9xx, 8Q; 85257p. Miyata, S.; Takada, M.; Okada, A., Ger. Offen., 2,222,473 ; Chem. Abst., 19xx, 81, 54438q. Miyata, S.; Kuroda, M, Ger. Offen., 2,950,489 ; Chem. Abst., 1920:, 28, 96250a. Miyata, S., Clays Clay Miner., 1980, 28, 50. Herman, R.G.; Klier, K.; Simons, G.W.; Finn, B.P.; Bulko, J.B.; Kobylinski, T.P., J. Catal., 1979, 16, 407. Reichle, W.T., J. Catal., 1985, %, 547. Martin, K.J.; Pinnavaia, T.J., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1986, m, 541. Itaya, K.; Chang, H.C.; Uchida, I., Inorg. Chem., 1987, 26, 24. Pope, M.P.,"Heteropoly and Isopoly Oxometalates", Springer, New York, 1983. Day, V.W.; Klemoerer, W.G., Nature, 1985, _2_28, 533. Krebs, B., Acta Crystallogr., Sec. B, 1972, 28, 2222 Kihlborg, L., Ark. Kemi., 1963, A, 3 Keggin, J.F., Nature, 1933, _l_3’_1_,_908. Teze, A.; Herve, G., J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem, 1977, 22, 2151. Kerpet, D.L.," The early Transition Elements", Academic Press, New York, 1972, pp.54. 62. 63. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71 . 72. 73. 74. 75. 76. 77. 78. 79. 80. 81 . 254 Kazansky, L.P.; Potapovaand, I.V.; Spitsyn, V.I., Proc. 3rd Internat. Conf. Chemistry and Uses of Molybdenum, Ann Arbor, MI, 1979, pp.67. Copaux, H., Bull. Soc. Chim. France, 1908, 2, 101 Teze, A.; Herve, G., J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem, 1977, 32, 999. Massart, R.; Contant, R.; Fruchart, M.I.; Ciabrini, J.P.; Foumier, M., Inorg. Chem, 1980, 16, 2916. a) Kehrmann, A., Z. Anorg. Chem, 1892, 1, 423. b) Souchay, P., Ann. Chim., 1947, 2, 203. c) Contant, R.; Fruchart, J.M.; Teze, A., C. R. Acad. Sci. Ser.C, 1974, 218, 199. Herve, G.; Teze, A., C. R. Acad. Sci., Ser.C, 1974,278, 1417. Baker, L.C.W.; Baker, V.E.S.; Eriks, K.; Pope, M.T.; Shibata, M.; Rollins, G.W., Fang, J.H.; Koh, L.L., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 2329. Bradley, A.J.; Illigworth, J.W., Pro. Roy. Soc., A, 1936, lfl, 113. Foumier, M.,Doctoral Thesis, Universite Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, 1976. Fuchs, 1.; Jahr, K.F., z. Natwforsch., 1974, 23.0. 1380 Meikleijohn, P.T.; Pope, M.T.; Prados, R.A., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1974, 26, 6779. Salamonn-Bertho, G.; chebvre, 1., CR. Acad. Sci., Ser. C, 1975, 280, 1199. Zonnevijlle, F.; Toume, C.M.; Toume, G.F., Inorg. Chem, 1982, 22, 2742, 2751. Baker, L.C.W.; Figgis, J.S.,*J. Am. Chem. Soc., 197022, 3794. Beltyukova, S.V.; Poluektov, N.S.; Kravchenko, T.B.; Kononenko, L.I., Dokl. Phys. Chem, 1978, 2L8, 165[1369] Malik, S.A.; Weakley, T.J.R., J. Chem. Soc., A, 1968, 2647. Rippan, R.; Puscasu, M., Z. Anorg. Chem, 1968, 258, 83. Teze, A.; Herve, G., J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem, 1977, 22, 2151. Teze, A.; Souchy, P., CR. Acad. Sci., Ser. C, 1973,216, 1525. Toume, C.; Toume, 6., Bull. Soc. Chim. F r., 1969, 1124, 82. 83. 84. 85. 86. 87. 88. 89. 91. 92. 93. 94. 95. 96. 97. 98. 100. 101. 102. 255 Toume, C.M.; Toume, G.; Malik, S.A.; Weakley, T.J.R., J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem, 1970, 32, 3875. Hoof, D.L.; Pope, M.T., unpublished work. Bushey, P.A., MS. Thesis, Georgetown University, 1974. Wendel, C.H.; Pope, M.T., unpublished work. Brown, D.H., J. Chem. Soc., 1962, 4408. Weakley, T.J.R., J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1973.341. a) Baker, L.C.W.; Figis, J.S., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1970, 2, 3794. b) Landis, A.L., ph D. Thesis, Georgetown University, 1977; Diss. Abst., 38B, 4225. Herve, G.; Teze, A., Inorg. Chem, 1977, 16, 2115. Peacock, R.D.; Weakley, T.J.R., J. Chem. Soc. A, 1971, 1836. Botar, A.V.; Weakley, T.J.R., Rev. Roum. Chim., 1973,28, 1155. Marcu, 0.; Rusu, M.; Botar, A.V., Rev. Roum. Chim., 1974, 12, 827. Termes, S.C.; Pope, M.T., Transit. Met. Chem, 1978, 3, 103. Toume, C.; Toume, 6., Rev. Chim. Mineral, 1977, E, 83. Kosyakov, Y.N.; Timofeev, G.A.; Erin, E.A.; Andreev, V.I.; Kopytov, V.V.; Simakin, G.A., Sov. Radiochem., 1977, 12, 418[511]. Saprykin, A.S.; Spitsyn, V.I.; Krot, N.N., Dokl. Chem, 1976, £6, 114(853]. Saprykin, A.S.; Spitsyn, V.I.; Orlova, M.M.; Zhuravleva, O.P.; Krot, N.N., Sov. Radiochem., 1978,20, 207[247]. Marcu, G.; Botar, A.; Rusu, M., Roum Chem. 1977, 24, 1465. Itzal, S.M.; Malik, S.A., Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1977, 22, L29. Spitsyn, V.I.; Orlova, M.M; Saprykina, O.P.; Saprykin, A.S.; Krot, N.N, Russ. J. Inorg. Chem, 1977, _2_2, 1355[2508]. Peacock, R.D.; Weakley, T.J.R., J. Chem. Soc. 1971, A, 1836. Kuruscev, T.; Sargeson, A.M.; West, B.O., J. Phys. Chem, 1957, 62, 1559. 103. 104. 105. 106. 107. 108. 109. 110. 111. 112. 113. 114. 115. 116. 117. 118. 119. 120. 121. 122. 123. 256 Baker, L.C.W.; Pope, M.T., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1960, 82, 4176. Evans. H.T.Jr., Perspect. Struct. Chem, 1971, 51, l. Barcza, L.; Pope, M.T., J. Phys. Chem, 1973, 7 , 1795. Klemperer, W.G.; Shum, W., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1978.229, 4891. Day, V.W.; Klemperer, W.G.; Schwartz, C., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1987, M, 6030. Finke, R.G.; Rapko, B.; Saxton, R.J.; Domaille, P.J.; J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1986, 128, 2947. Papaconstantinou, E.; Dimotikali, D.; Politou, A. Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1980, 16, 155. Papaconstantinou, B., J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun., 1982, 12 Hill, C.L.; Bouchard, D.A., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1985.201, 5148. Prosser-McCartha, C.M.; Kadkhodayan, M.; Williamston, M.M.; Bouchard, D.A.; Hill, C.L., J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun., 1986, 1747. Fox, M.A.; Cardona, R.; Gaillard, B., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1987, Q2, 6347. Papaconstantinou, B., J. Chem. Soc, Faraday Trans., 1982, 1, 18, 2769. Dubinin, M.M., Prog. Surf. Membr. Sc., 1975, 1. a) Dubinin, M.M.; Zaverina, R.D.; Radushkevich, L.V., Zh. F iz. Khim., 1947, 21., 1351. b) Radushkevich, L.V., Zh. F iz. Khim., 1949, 28, 1410. Marsh, H.; Rand, B., J. Colloid Interface Sci., 1969,28, 101. Dubinin, M.M.; Astakhov, V.A., Adv. Chem. Ser., 1970.222, 69. Mikhail, R.S.; Brunauer, S.; Bodor, E.E, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 1968, 26, 45. Massart, R.; Contant, R.; Fruchart, J.M., Ciabrini, J.P.; Foumier, M., Inorg. Chem, 1977, 16, 2916. Weakley, T.J.R., J. Chem. Soc., Dalton, 1973, 343. 1 Teze, A.; Herve, G., J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem, 1977, 32, 999. Dommaille, P.J., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1984, 206, 7677. 124. 125. 126. 127. 128. 129. 130. 131. 132. 133. 1 34. 135. 136. 257 Zonnevijlle, F.; Toume, C.M.; Toume, G.F., Inorg. Chem, 1983, 2_2, 1198. Zonnevijlle, F.; Toume, C.M.; Toume, G.F., Inorg. Chem, 1983, 2_1, 1198. Baker, L.C.W.; McCutcheon, T.P., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1956, 18, 4503. Mooney, R.W.; Chiola, V.; .Hoffman, C.W.W.; Vandertpool, C.D., J. Electrochem. Soc., 1962, 1179. Evans Jr., H.T.; Rollins, G.W., Acta Cryst. 1976, 222, 1565. a) Preyssler, C., Bull. Soc. Chim. F r., 1970, 30. b) Alizadeh, M.H.; Hamalker, S.P.; Jeannin, Y.; Martin-Prere, 1.; Pope, M.P., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1985, 1_Ol, 2662. Altenau, J .J .; Pope, M.T.; Prados, R.A.; So, H., Inorg. Chem, 1975, Li, 417. Nomiya, K.; Kato, K.; Miwa, M., Polyhedron, 1986, 5, 811. Finke, R.G.; Rapko, B.; Saxton, R.J.; Domaille, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1986, 108, 2947 . a) Howarth, G.W.; Jarrold, M., J. Chem. Soc., Dalton, 1978, 503. b) Kazanskii, L.P.; Spitsyn, V.I., Dokl. Acad. Nauk SSSR, 1975, 25, 721[381]. Kazanskii, L.P.; Fedotov, M.A.; Spitsyn, V.P., Dokl. Phys. Chem, 1977, 235, '6l7[l376]. Hernandez-Moreno, J.; Ulibarri, M.A.; Rendon, J.L.; Sema, 1., Phys. Chem. Miner., 1985, 12, 34. a) Thouvent, R.; Foumier, M.; Franck, R.;Rocchiccioli-Deltcheff, C., Inorg. Chem, 1984, 25, 598. b) Rocchiccioli-Deltcheff, C.; Fournier, M.; Franck,R.; Thouvenot, R., Inorg. Chem. 1983, 22, 207. c) Rocchiccioli-Deltcheff, C.; Thouvenot, R, J. Chem. Research (s), 1977 , 46. d) Rocchiccioli-Deltcheff, C.; Thouvenot, R.; Franck, R., Spectra Chim. Acta, 1976, 22A, 587. 137. 138. 139. 140. 141. 258 e) Rocchiccioli-Deltcheff, C.; Thouvenot, R., C. R. Acad. Sc. Paris, Ser. C, 1974, 218, 857. f) Thouvenot, R.; Rocchiccioli-Deltcheff, C.;Souchay, P., C. R. Acad. Sc. Paris, Ser. C, 1974, 2_7_8, 455. Kazanskii, L.P., Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR, Div. Chem. Sci., 1975, M., 432[502]. Contant, R., Can. J. Chem. 1987, 65, 568. Kato, R.; Kobayashi, A.; Sasaki, Y., Inorg. Chem, 1982, 21, 240. Kiss, B.A., Acta Chim. Acad. Sc. Hungaricae, T omus, 1973, 15(4), 351. Katsoulis, D.E.; Pope, M.T., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1984, 1%, 2737.