V m x M N" C “.C.“ 21"‘31 gay . _ . CC . F55”: Wm}. M. 1" t ‘ . ' , . .1. ' ,3. C._C .1‘” u: v w «W x 7 1;. “4.2mm: f ‘ :‘uw 3%} 3“ my; d"‘~ fiifi‘} l J ’31- 335:” \n .. ‘ $.}'3'C5";C m :. afi" Cc; “C C . ,. L": ‘6 .C..“ “$2.4. V QUEE‘W , C". “39:“. aim; ,xdi’guigC 1’17"?"“1rfu «a #3?” 5133112.; ' "M v V “‘1‘. g z' n. - ' fl 7 fig? 3. " ‘\ 11,-.“ y 33% ' C y fl“ . C . . m .‘ “7 " 53"“ '1 ‘ ’31- ‘fiV'fif‘ H= (Li-3 ' “It?“ a: "3'; vii: , _ ,, .C.. _ . , C.- .u x é“? .C ‘ 3.615"?- ,”““‘x*.,. 3:. C” -‘J-' , “795 1-4?“ . u‘é 535: .- . iff-22531§$ ‘ : A...~.‘C’“"‘{”31 "" '7‘ 1‘" ~ ’1‘ ‘ 7' ‘ -~ ' 42.1.2. .. 'P; C C . C - < ,. .. .. _ ‘ gem.‘-::~. .ww Ho'vv *7' J.“ C C ' «Jena; M «g... :x‘gvgu . ”x . . 33:3. ‘ “ 1‘ w ,. ':.“ . 7*..12‘“ A ECL‘E‘Z‘I‘QCQ. :31». y‘“"' ’ “ C ', .3513? '- W . ‘7 "a; , Camgnfia ' ' ‘7‘” \'?~‘,:.’¥3~”g ””3323; ..3.'** . 'Luxk- I.» . C ’ 1' "V” *3 ,‘ n ' ' " ‘ w "‘ {4a m “1‘? ?:“" "19:55“! v 77::- Ci: «:3: xl‘wlxpu'c‘uv U “ ' ’ qr" "."M' ,ILE‘ \f :anéi'wt: 513‘?“ - "ii-k 3W5 "§2¥xgE-E~Z-.‘:‘ ”ZR ‘ ‘ “ 811% Lu- 1 5%; 3‘3}: } girxfu'f . L». '. “ {T’s-‘1‘ 1.. 315%.?" 7. u Neda-4:” . .- “4r”? ., . 1 3M;- 3*" U.“ .{ti‘fi‘a ...~. . W" 1 ,C“ Jha J C 3 unh ; .mr “7 'w' ’f 'i ‘ ‘2; ,, x.- etfig' $5,: . EU 3 3"- 'l 1 h I? 3" .2 2: ~ 2. ’. ) 7.‘ ':. '... C 4 '9'“ i; 1 1 ‘y ‘ § V ‘f I . '. . Mg; 1 P i J ‘V‘ . I ' ’7 ’v 1‘ .I f I , ..' a ‘ lllllltllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllhllllllllll 3 1293 0087648 This is to certify that the dissertation entitled Ecology of Pseudomonas syringag pv. phaseolicola in northern Tanzania presented by Robert B. Mabagala has been accepted towards fulfillment . of the requirements for Ph.D. degreein Botany & Plant Path. (Mg/,AiJ (/M/ 124% )k Major professor Date [fl/Jj/79/ MS U is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Institution 0- 12771 LIBRARY Michigan State University PLACE IN RETURN BOX to remove thie checkout from your record. TO AVOID FINES return on or before due due. DATEDUE DATE DUE DATE DUE H— i ll W I! MSU In An Affirmative ActioniEquel Opportunity Institution chS—p.‘ ECOLOGY OF PSEUDOMONAS SYRINGAE PV. PHASEOLICOLA IN NORTHERN TANZANIA By Robert B. Mabagala . A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Botany and Plant Pathology 1991 , c. I 53 (1;; . ." ' s v v i Z5 -— 9 ABSTRACT ECOLOGY OF PSEUDOMONAS SYRINGAE PV. PHASEOLICOLA IN NORTHERN TANZANIA By Robert B. Mabagala This study was undertaken to investigate the ecology of Pseudomonas m pv. phaseolicola, the causal agent of halo blight of beans, in the Arusha and Kilimanjaro regions, northern Tanzania. A total of 118 isolates were collected from November 1988 to February 1990, and examined for pathogenic variability using four differential bean cultivars. Three races were found; race 2 occurred at a higher frequency (52.5%) than race 1 (44.9%) and race 3 (2.5%). Some isolates of race 2, designated race 2P, produced a brown diffusible pigment on agar media. Some race 2P isolates grew at a higher temperature (34 i 2°C) than the non-pigment-producing race 2 isolates or race 1 and 3 isolates. Race 2 isolates obtained from bean debris in Monduli, Arusha region, were more virulent than those isolated from growing bean plants. They induced systemic chlorosis and stunting on the usually resistant differential bean cultivar, Edmund. The ability of fig. pv. phaseolicola to survive in bean debris and in dead standing bean plants varied depending on race, geographical location, depth of placement in the soil and the bean genotype used. Volunteer bean plants also provided an alternative survival site for halo blight bacteria. Of the 17 weed species belonging to 10 families, only Neonotonia mgi_i_ti_i served as a perennial reservoir of 2s. pv. phaseolicola. The weed survived the dry periods on fences, hedge rows, by roadsides, on ditch banks near bean fields and in comers of farmers’ fields. Only race 1 of the bacterium was recovered from 1:1. wightii. However, under artificial inoculation the weed was susceptible to all three races. Since race 1 of 13.5. pv. phaseolicola was not seed-borne in 1:1, mm this precludes the weed spreading the halo blight pathogen into new areas through seed. Intercropping beans with maize favored multiplication of halo blight bacteria on and in bean leaves, and resulted in more severe disease on pods and in a higher percentage of seed infection, than occurred in beans grown in pure stands. Maize leaves did not support high populations of halo blight bacteria, and thus do not seem to provide additional inoculum for the bean crop when the two are grown in association. In memory of my advisor Dr. A.W. Saettler and my uncle, Muhindi Musiba. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I express my sincere gratefulness to Dr. 11.. Lockwood for his encouragement and guidance throughout the writing phase of this study. My sincere appreciations are also extended to other members of my committee, Dr. Jim Kelly, Dr. C. Stephens, and Dr. P. Hart for their suggestions and criticisms during the course of the study. I am also grateful to Dr. MJ. Silbemagel, Mr. D.L. Kessy, Ms. B. Gondwe, Dr. DJ. Allen, Dr. J.D. 'Iaylor, Prof. J.M. Teri, and Joseph Matata for support and encouragement during the course of this study. Moral support given by my brother, Augustine and his family during the research phase is highly acknowledged. Financial support provided by Washington State University/Tanzania Bean/Cowpea CRSP Program and the Rockefeller Foundation African Dissertation Internship Award is gratefully acknowledged. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables vii List of Figures ix CHAPTER 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1 LITERATURE REVIEW 2 Occurrence and severity 3 Synonyms of the pathogen 4 Morphological and physiological characteristics 4 Host range 5 Survival 5 Epiphytic phase 7 Penetration and population dynamics 7 Dissemination 8 Symptoms 8 Pathogenic variation 10 Synergism 13 Cultural control 14 Chemical control 14 Plant resistance— 15 LITERATURE CITED 17 CHAPTER 2 PATHOGENIC VARIATION OF PSEUDOMONAS W PV. PHASEOLICOLA IN NORTHERN TANZANIA 24 INTRODUCTION 25 MATERIALS AND METHODS 26 Sampling and isolation 26 Bacteriophage tests 28 Serology 29 Reference strains '29 Storage of isolates 79 Soil sterilization 30 Growing of plants 30 Inoculum preparation 30 Race identification iv Temperature studies 31 Survival studies 32 Soil pH measurements 33 Volunteer bean plants 34 Weather data 34 RESULTS 34 Prevailing races 34 Tbmperature studies 35 Survival studies 42 pH values 44 Volunteer plants 45 Weather data 45 DISCUSSION 50 LITERATURE CITED 54 CHAPTER 3 THE ROLE OF WEEDS IN SURVIVAL OF PSEUDOMONAS SYRINGAE PVI PHASEOLICOLA IN NORTHERN TANZANIA 57 INTRODUCTION 58 MATERIALS AND METHODS 60 Sampling and isolation procedures 60 Storage of isolates 61 Sterilization and grinding of samples 62 Identification of bacterial isolates 62 Pathogenicity tests 64 Ice nucleation activity 64 Carbon source utilization 65 Bacteriophage tests 65 Serology 66 Race identification 66 Assay of Neonotonia wightii reproductive parts for Lg. pv. phaseolicola infection 66 Neonotonia wightii seed infection and transmission assay 67 Reaction of Neonotonia wightii to races 1, 2 and 3 of 24;. pv. phaseolicola 68 Insects as pests of beans and Neonotonia wightii 70 RESULTS 71 Identification of bacterial isolates 76 Pathogenicity tests 76 Race identification 77 Assay of N. wightii reproductive parts for infection by Ls. pv. phaseolicola ......... 77 N. wightii seed infection and transmission assay Reaction of _N. wightii to races 1, 2 and 3 of 2s. pv. phaseolicola Susceptibility of three bean cultivars to insect pests of N. wightii DISCUSSION 79 81 81 84 LITERATURE CITED CHAPTER4 88 POPULATION DYNAMICS OF PSEUDOMONAS SYRINGAE PVI PHASEOLICOLA IN TWO BEAN CROPPING SYSTEMS IN NORTHERN TANZANIA 91 INTRODUCTION 92 MATERIALS AND METHODS 95 Location 95 Experimental design 95 Bacterial isolates 96 Inoculation of plants 96 Sampling of leaves 97 Bacterial population trends 97 Evaluation of disease reaction 98 Leaf wetness studies 98 Bean seed infection assay 98 Weather data 99 Data analysis 99 RESULTS 99 Population dynamies at Lambn 99 Population dynamics at Lyarnnngn 100 Populations of Ls. pv. phaseolicola on and in maize 105 Leaf and pod disease ratings 110 Retention of moisture on leaves 112 Climatological data 112 Bean seed infection 118 DISCUSSION .118 LITERATURE CITED 123 TABLE LIST OF TABLES CHAPTERZ Distribution of races of Pseudomonas m’ngae pv. phaseolicola in Arusha and Kilimanjaro regions, northern Tanzania Influence of temperature on growth of representative PAGE 39 isolates of races of Pseudomonas m pv. phaseolicola ....... 41 Survival of Pseudomonas sm'ngae pv. phaseolicola races 1 and 2 in infected bean debris buried for 6 months at two depths under field conditions at Ngarash, Monduli, Arusha region and at Lyamungu, Kilimanjaro region northern Tanzania CHAPTER3 Weed families and species assayed for presence of Pseudomonas sm'ngae pv. phaseolicola in northern Tanzania Race identification of Pseudomonas m’ngae pv. phaseolicola strains isolated from Neonotonia wightii in northern Tanzania ~ Percentage of Neonotonia wigl_1tii seed infected with Pseudomonas m’ngae pv. phaseolicola and other bacteria in northern Tanzania Reaction of Neonotonia wightii to races 1, 2 and 3 of Pseudomonas gig'ngae pv. phaseolicola from northern Tanzania Susceptibility of seed of three bean cultivars grown in 43 72 78 82 northern Tanzania, and _N. wightii seed to bruchid weevils ....... 83 TABLE CHAPTER 4 PAGE Halo blight disease severity ratings for foliage and pods of Canadian Wonder bean in two bean cropping systems in northern Tanzania 111 Time required for visible moisture on bean and maize leaves to dry following cessation of rain at Lyamungu, Kilimanjaro region, northern Tanzania 113 Percentage of Canadian Wonder bean seed infected with Pseudomonas m’ngae pv. phaseolicola in two bean cropping systems in northern Tanzania 119 FIGURE LIST OF FIGURES CHAPTER 2 PAGE Map of Tanzania showing location of Arusha and Kilimanjaro regions 27 Origin of Pseudomonas _svg'ngae pv. phaseolicola isolates in northern Tanzania. 1 = Lambo, 2 = Lyamungu, 3 = Kilema, 4 = Milwaleni, 5 = Sanya J uu, 6 = Thugeru, 7 = Selian, 8 = Monduli 36 Relative frequency of races 1, 2 and 3 of Pseudomonas sm'ngae pv. phaseolicola in collections made in Arusha and Kilimanjaro regions, northern Tanzania from November, 1988 to February, 1990. Frequencies are expressed as percentages of the total number of isolates collected. 2P represents race 2 isolates producing brown diffusible pigment 38 Stunting and systemic chlorosis symptoms produced by race 2 isolates obtained from bean debris in Monduli, Arusha region northern Tanzania on a resistant differential bean cultivar, Edmund 40 Monthly rainfall from June to December at Monduli for 1989 and mean monthly rainfall for 3 years (1986-1988). Numbers above each bar represent number of rain days during the indicated month 46 Monthly rainfall and mean monthly maximum and minimum temperatures from June to December at Lyamungu for 1989 and for 53 years (1935-1988). Numbers aboveeach bar represent numbers of rain days during the indicated month 48 FIGURE CHAPTER 3 PAGE Typical halo blight symptoms on Neonotonia wightii leaves 74 Halo blight-infected Neonotonia wightii plants surviving the dry season on a fence at Lyamungu Agricultural Research Station, Tanzania 75 CHAPTER4 Surface and internal population dynamies of Pseudomonas m pv. phaseolicola race 1 on and in bean foliage in two bean cropping systems at Lambo, Kilimanjaro region, northern Tanzania. Bars indicate standard errors of the means 101 Surface and internal population dynamics of Pseudomonas m’ngae pv. phaseolicola race 1 on and in bean foliage in two bean cropping systems at Lyamungu, Kilimanjaro region, northern Tanzania. Bars indicate standard errors of the means 103 Surface and internal population dynamies of Pseudomonas _syg’ggag pv. phaseolicola race 1 on and in maize foliage in monocrop and intercrop systems at Lambo, Kilimanjaro region, northern Tanzania. Bars indicate standard errors of the means 106 FIGURE CHAPTER 4 PAGE Surface and internal population dynamics of Pseudomonas gm’ngae pv. phaseolicola race 1 on and in maize foliage in monocrop and intercrop systems at Lyamungu, Kilimanjaro region, northern Tanzania. Bars indicate standard errors of the means 108 Monthly rainfall and mean monthly maximum and minimum temperatures from March to July at Lambo for 1989 and for 53 years (1935-1988). Numbers above each bar represent number of rain days during the indicated month 114 Monthly rainfall and mean monthly maximum and minimum temperatures from March to July at Lyamungu for 1989 and for 53 years (1935-1988). Numbers above each bar represent number of rain days during the indicated month ....... 116 Chapter 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION Beans (Phaseolus m L.) are an important source of dietary protein in many parts of the world, including Tanzania. Production occurs in a wide range of cropping systems and environments (Allen gt a_l., 1989; CIAT; 1986). In Tanzania, beans are mainly grown in the highlands of northern, southern and western parts of the country where rainfall is adequate for bean production. However, yields have remained relatively low with an average yield of 600 kg/ha in farmers’ fields (CRSP, 1990). Like many other tropical bean production regions, diseases, insect pests, and low fertility are the most important production constraints in the country. Halo blight incited by Pseudomonas m pv. phaseolicola (Burk) Young, Dye and Mlkie is one of the most important diseases of beans in Tanzania. The disease is very prevalent in high, cool, wet areas where beans are mainly grown, and losses due to halo blight can be severe (Silbemagel and Mills, 1987). Because of the widespread occurrence and the severity of halo blight in areas where the disease occurs in the country, it is assumed that the disease causes considerable yield reduction. However, the precise extent of losses has not been well established. Recently, in field trials conducted at Lyamungu, northern Tanzania, yield losses of up to 42% in susceptible cultivars were reported (CIAT; 1989). Breeding for halo blight resistance is generally considered the best method of 1 2 controlling the disease in small holder production systems in 'Ihnzania, and efforts are being made to produce halo blight resistant varieties (Thri e_t 91., 1990). However, the development of resistant varieties must take into account variability of both the pathogen and the genetic resistance in the host. In addition, successful halo blight control measures require a thorough understanding of the ecology of halo blight bacteria in the country. While much information on Ls. pv. phaseolicola is readily available in other countries, little is known about the ecology of this bacterial pathogen in Tanzania. The objective of this dissertation was, therefore, to examine the ecology of fig. pv. phaseolicola in northern Tanzania. The study was divided into three parts: pathogenic variation and survival in the soil of halo blight bacteria in northern Tanzania are covered in Chapter 2. Chapter 3 examines the role of weeds in survival of halo blight bacteria. In northern Tanzania, as in many other parts of the country, the majority of the bean crop is grown in association with maize and other crops. Chapter 4 is, therefore, devoted to population dynamics of fig. pv. phaseolicola in beans when grown in pure stands and in association with maize. LITERATURE REVIEW Halo blight of beans is caused by the bacterium Pseudomonas m pv. phaseolicola (Burk) Young, Dye & Wilkie (Young 9; a_l., 1978). The disease was first reported and described from the state of New York by Burkholder in 1926. Since then, the disease has been reported in many countries of Central and South America, U.S.A., Africa, Europe and Australia (Buruchara, 1983; Johnson, 1969; Msuku, 1984; Schwartz, 1980; Schwartz and Pastor-Corrales, 1989). In Thnzania and other tropical countries, halo 3 blight is more prevalent in high, cool, wet areas where beans are produced. In such areas, the disease can cause severe crop losses (CIA‘I; 1981; Karel e_t _al., 1981; Silbemagel and Mills, 1987). Occurrence and severity Yield losses of 23-43 percent have occurred in research fields in Michigan (Saettler and Potter, 1970), and the disease has caused serious losses in Colorado (Schwartz and Legard, 1986). In eastern Africa, the disease can be of economic important in Malawi and Kenya, but rarely in Uganda, except at the highest altitudes of cultivation (Allen, 1983). Halo blight disease has generally been considered of minor importance in Tanzania, especially in some areas of the Kilimanjaro region. However, in recent years severe outbreaks of the disease have been reported in some parts of this region and in other regions such as Arusha, Mbeya and West Lake. These outbreaks have been suggested to be due to the occurrence of a new virulent race, probably race 3 of the pathogen (Gondwe, 1987). Although it is well known that plant diseases constitute a major constraint to bean production in Tanzania and elsewhere in Africa, there are very few reliable data quantifying crop losses. In addition, it is difficult to extrapolate yield losses made under experimental conditions to those likely to be incurred in agricultural practice, where crop yields are limited by a complex of stress factors, of which diseases are but a part (Allen, 1983). Research geared toward estimating yield losses due to halo blight and other bacterial diseases in Tanzania is generally lacking. Such a situation has resulted in underestimating yield losses caused by halo blight disease. Smonms of the pathogen Other names of Pseudomonas m pv. phaseolicola found in literature include: Phflomonas medicaginis (Sackett) Bergey gt a_l., var. phaseolicola Burkholder; Bacterium medicaginis (Sackett) E.F. Smith var. phaseolicola (Burkholder) Link & Hull; Pseudomonas medicaginis Sackett var. phaseolicola (Burkholder) Stapp and Kotte; Bacterium puerariae Hedges; and Pseudomonas medicaginis Sackett f.sp. phaseolicola (Burkholder) Dowson (Bradbury, 1986; CMI, 1965). Morphological and phfiiological characteristics Pseudomonas Mag pv. phaseolicola exhibits very distinct morphological, physiological and nutritional characteristics. Cells appear as single straight rods (Sands e1 a_l., 1970), and are motile with peritrichous flagella. Cells are gram-negative, strictly aerobic and do not require growth factors. Poly-B-hydroxybutyrate is not accumulated as an intracellular carbon reserve. In artificial media, especially those deficient in iron, cultures produce a diffusible fluorescent pigment. Arginine dihydrolase activity is absent (Doudoroff and Pallerozin, 1974), and it is oxidase negative (Kovacs, 1956). The bacteria are capable of utilizing D-gluconate, L (+) arabinose, sucrose, succinate, DL-B-hydroxybutyrate, transconitate, L-serine, L-alanine and p-hydroxy benzoate, but glutarate, mesotartrate, DL-glycerate, iso-ascorbate, erythritol, sorbitol, meso-inositol and N-caproate are not utilized. The optimum temperature for growth is 20-23°C. White to creamy colonies with a bluish hue are produced which may be either smooth or rough (Adam and Pugsley, 1934; Zaumeyer and Thomas, 1957). It has been observed that the rough and smooth colony forms of _P_.§_. pv. phaseolicola are different from one another serologically and in their reaction to 5 bacteriophages. The rough forms were later shown to produce less extracellular polysaccharides and to be less virulent than the smooth forms (Carey and Starr, 1957). Extracellular polysaccharides produced by Psp have been associated with pathogenicity on susceptible bean leaves (Buruchara, 1983; Epton e_t g, 1977). Host range Halo blight bacteria can infect various plant species. Moffett (1983), Schwartz, (1989) and Zaumeyer and Thomas (1957) included the following as hosts: common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L), lima bean (P. lunatus L), tepary bean (2. acutifolius A. Gray var. acutifolius), Marcrogtilium bracteatum (Nees ex Mart) Maréchal et Baudet, scarlet runner bean (E. coccineus L), B. pglyanthus Greenman, P. must—arm (L), pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L) Millsp.), hyacinth bean (Lablab purpureus (L) Sweet), soybean (Glycine 1.7133 (L) Merrill), Vigga angularis (Willd.) Ohwi et Ohasi, mung bean (X. radiata (L) Wilczek var. radiata), Pueraria lobata (Mlld) Ohwi, glycine (Neonotonia wightii (Arn.) Lackey) and siratro (Macroptilium atropugpureum (DC) Urb. (CIAT; 1987). M Knowledge as to how a pathogen survives and is disseminated is very important for developing successful control strategies. Halo blight bacterium survives in infected seeds and plant residue on the soil surface, and has been found on volunteer beans in the field early in the growing season (Legard and Schwartz, 1987; Schuster and Coyne, 1975b, Schwartz, 1989). The bacterium survives in these habitats until environmental conditions become favorable for infection. Ls. pv. phaseolicola has also been reported to survive for nine months after passage through sheep which consumed infested plant debris (Starr and Kercher, 1969). 6 It has been observed that survival in bean plant debris buried under dry condition is often longer than when soil is saturated (Allen, 1983). Buddenhagen (1965) suggested that bacterial pathogens evolving away from the requirements of soil saprophytic existence have tended to develop sustained plant to plant infection cycles often through insect transmission. Coupled with survival in seed, they have thus lost the more complex requirements of survival in the soil. Thus, the halo blight pathogen has essentially been liberated from the requirements of soil phase through seed transmission or through association with a perennial host (Allen, 1983). Schuster and Coyne (1975b) observed that the more virulent strains of fig. pv. phaseolicola were better adapted for survival than the less virulent strains. This may be due to the fact that more virulent strains tend to multiply to higher numbers in the host than the less virulent strains. I_n m P_. pv. phaseolicola cells survived in liquid nitrogen at - 172°C for 30 months or on silica gel at -20°C for 60 months (Leben and Sleesman, 1982; Moore and Carlson, 1975). The bacterium has a tremendous potential to cause disease. As few as 0.1 percent of halo blight infected seed can, under conducive environmental conditions, lead to severe crop losses in susceptible bean cultivars (Patel 91 _a_l., 1964, Schwartz, 1980, 1989). Under Wisconsin conditions, as few as 12 infected seeds per hectare may lead to an epidemic of halo blight disease (Walker and Patel, 1964). Zero tolerance of infected seed appears to be a necessity where rates of disease spread are likely to be high. Under British conditions a tolerance level of 1 infected seed per 5 kg has been estimated as the maximum allowable for the halo blight bacterium (Taylor e_t £11., 1979). In tests of disease transmission from seed to seedlings, it has been found that heavily infected seeds usually failed to produce seedlings. Most infections developed from seeds with slight or no symptoms at all (Allen, 1983). 7 Since the halo blight bacteria survive and are transmissible by seed, in Tanzania it is more severe for farmers who do not purchase high quality seed but rather maintain a portion of their harvest for the next planting (Gondwe, 1987). Programs to produce pathogen-free seed by growing the crop under furrow irrigation are lacking. Epiphflic phase of Rs. pv. phgseolicolg The epiphytic phase of fig. pv. phaseolicola was first reported by Ercolani e_t £11., (1974). Their studies indicated that halo blight bacteria multiplied to some extent on hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth, Leguminoseae) near bean fields, especially in field corners under Wisconsin conditions. Using a rifampicin-resistant mutant of 2.5. pv. phaseolicola, Stadt and Saettler (1981) observed that the pathogen was capable of establishing an epiphytic phase on bean leaves in Michigan. Under Colorado conditions, Legard and Schwartz (1987) demonstrated that gs. pv. phaseolicola can occur as an epiphyte on dry beans. They further observed that the bacterium became a predominant epiphyte late in the season when bean plants matured. Penetration and pppulation dypamics Ls. pv. phaseolicola enters plants through wounds or stomata during periods of high relative humidity or free moisture (Saettler and Potter, 1970;, Zaumeyer and Thomas, 1957). Maino (1972) reported that the bacterium produces hemicellulases which degrade host cell wall material during pathogenesis. The pathogen multiplies epiphytically on blossoms, pods and stem internodes under experimental conditions. 24;». pv. phaseolicola also multiplies rapidly on or near the surface of foliage with or without lesions in the presence of dew (Saettler and Potter, 1970; Stadt and Saettler, 1981). We Dissemination of fig. pv. phaseolicola between plants occurs by water splash and winds during periods of rainfall. Insects, animals and people moving through the crop when the foliage is wet can also spread the pathogen (Walker and Patel, 1964). Pod infection with halo blight bacteria, especially of the dorsal vascular tissues can lead to internal seed contamination which is the primary means of dissemination. Contaminated seed is important for both local and long distance transport of Ls. pv. phaseolicla (Saettler and Potter, 1970; Stadt and Saettler, 1981). Smiptoms The disease affects all parts of the plant above ground (Burkholder, 1926; Zaumeyer and Thomas, 1957). Characteristic leaf symptoms initially appear as small, brown, watersoaked spots on the abaxial surface of the leaves 3-5 days after infection (Omer and Wood, 1969). Later, a halo-like zone of greenish yellow tissue develops around the water- soaked areas. Patel and Walker (1965) observed that halos and pronounced systemic chlorosis develop more commonly at 16-20°C than at 24-28°C. They also noted that age and nutritional status of the host greatly influenced disease development. Older leaves were more tolerant than young leaves, while extreme low and high levels of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium retarded the development of halo blight. Systemic chlorosis may occur. Both the halo and systemic chlorosis are due to a non-host specific toxin called phaseolotoxin produced by the bacterium during infection (Coyne and Schuster, 1974; Coyne e_t a_l., 1971; Schuster and Coyne, 1975a; Schwartz, 1989; Zaumeyer and Thomas, 1957). Phaseolotoxin has been purified and characterized as an ornithine-alanine-arginine tripeptide carrying a phosphosulfamyl group (Ferguson and 9 Johnston, 1980; Mitchell, 1976; Mitchell and Bieleski, 1977; Patil e_t a_l., 1972; Turner and Mitchell, 1985). The molecular genetics of phaseolotoxin production and immunity in fig. pv. phaseolicola have been investigated by Tn; mutagenesis and cosmid cloning procedures (Peet pt 91., 1985). These procedures indicate that soon after the tripeptide is secreted by bacteria into the plant, plant enzymes (peptidases) cleave the peptide bonds and release alanine, arginine and phosphosulfamylornithine. The latter is the biologically functional moeity of phaseolotoxin (Mitchell and Bieleski, 1977; Patil gt a_l., 1972). The toxin affects cells by binding to the active site of, and inactivating, the enzyme ornithine carbamoyltransferase (OCIhse) which normally converts ornithine to citrulline, a precursor of arginine. By its action on the enzyme, the toxin thus causes accumulation or ornithine and depleted levels of arginine (Mitchell and Bieleski, 1977; Patil _e_t_ pl, 1972; Turner and Mitchell, 1985). Studies by Peet gt a_l. (1985) indicate that a toxin insensitive OClhse activity found in toxigenic strains of the bacterium may be involved in the organism’s natural immunity to its own toxin. These researchers also suggest that at least some of the genes involved in phaseolotoxin production, as well as structural gene(s) for OCIhse may be clustered. Further research is, however, needed to determine whether the loci affecting phaseolotoxin production are structural genes involved in phaseolotoxin biosynthesis or in other pathways indirectly related to phaseolotoxin production. There is evidence that phaseolotoxin production may be suppressed in infected bean plants possessing hypersensitive resistance but not in susceptible bean plants (Allen, 1983). However, it has also been reported that pretreatment of resistant cultivars with the toxin can suppress the hypersensitive response and phytoalexin accumulation. Thus, it is likely 10 that the factor which determines hypersensitive resistance to halo blight disease is associated with suppression of phaseolotoxin production (Gnanamanickam and Patil, 1976). Stern and pod symptoms include typical greasy spots. On pods, lesions appear as green water-soaked spots which may enlarge and coalasce. Pod lesions in highly susceptible cultivars are water-soaked and may be colorless, while resistant cultivars may show less water soaking and reddish brown edges of restricted lesions (Schwartz, 1989; Stadt and Saettler, 1981; Zaumeyer and Thomas, 1957). Under humid conditions, a cream white exudate may be present in the center of the lesion and older lesions often have a shiny surface appearance indicating the presence of dried bacteria (Zaumeyer, 1932; Zaumeyer and Thomas, 1957). Infected developing pods may rot or become shrivelled and discolored. Stem girdling or joint rot occurs at nodes above the cotyledons when infection originates from contaminated seed (Schwartz, 1989; Zaumeyer and Thomas, 1957). Very small spots may appear on the seed, or the entire seed may be destroyed. In pigmented seed, it is difficult to distinguish spots caused by halo blight bacteria from those caused by other bean pathogens. Such pathogens include Colletotrichum lindemuthianum (Sacc. et Magn.) Briosi et Cav., the causal agent of bean anthracnose, and Xanthomonas camp_e§tris pv. p_h_as_eofl (EB Smith) Dowson, the causative organism of bean common bacterial blight (Msuku, 1984). A greater proportion of infected seed occurs when infection occurs earlier in plant development (Schwartz, 1989). Pathogenic variation Pathogenic variation among populations of Ls. pv. phaseolicola is well known. Using 13 isolates, Jensen and Livingstone (1944) were the first to demonstrate pathogenic variation in _P_.s. pv. phaseolicola. However, no differences were observed in physiological 11 tests except for slight differences in growth rate. Both qualitative (Patel and Walker, 1965) and quantitative (Schroth 91 a_l., 1971) variation in the pathogenicity of 11.9. pv. mm to beans have been reported. Qualitative differences (pathogenicity) have conventionally depended on the reaction of the bean cultivar Red Mexican UI-3 inoculated artificially. Patel and Walker (1965) reported the occurrence of race 1 and 2 in the U.S.A. These races were characterized based on the reaction of the inoculated bean cultivar, Red Mexican IU-3, which is resistant to race 1 but susceptible to race 2. On the same basis, the occurrence of these two races has been reported again in the U.S.A. (Schuster 91 91., 1965); South America (Buruchara and Pastor-Corrales, 1981; Schuster and Coyne, 19753; Schwartz, 1989); Great Britain (Epton and Deverall, 1965; Wharton, 1967); New Zealand (Hale and Taylor, 1973); Bulgaria (Poryazov, 1975); Kenya (Kinyua and Mukunya, 1981); Malawi (Msuku, 1984; Silbernagel and Mills, 1987); Tanzania (Taylor 91 91., 1987) and South Africa (Edington, 1990). The existence of another race of 2.9. pv. phaseolicola in the U.S.A. was first suggested by Schuster _e_t 91. (1979) and Coyne e_t 91. (1979). Recently, Taylor e_t 91. (1987) reported the existence in Africa of race 3, which was virulent toward bean cultivars with a single gene for resistance derived from the cultivar Red Mexican UI-3. Race 3 caused a hypersensitive reaction in the cultivar Rndergreen. Resistance to race 3 has subsequently been found to be governed by a single dominant gene, which is also present in several cultivars of U.S.A. origin, such as Seafarer and TEndercrop (Harper e_t 91, 1987). Experiments examining the effect of bacterial numbers on lesion production have shown that fewer cells of race 3 than race 1 and 2 were required for symptom development following inoculation of pods. Antagonism between these isolates was not observed i_n_ Litpq (Harper 91 91., 1987). D. J. Allen (personal communication) has indicated that race 3 of 2.9. pv. phaseolicola occurs in Colombia. 12 Characterization of halo blight bacteria isolates into race groups has been based on leaf and/or pod reactions (Buruchara, 1983; Hale and Taylor, 1973; Patel and Walker, 1965) following inoculation with bacteria, and on bacteriophage tests (Hale and Taylor, 1973; Thylor, 1970). Schroth 91 91. (1971) indicated that possibly, there are many strains of 2.9. pv. phaseolicola which vary in virulence. Neither race 1 nor race 2 were homogeneous with respect to virulence when tested on leaves of certain bean cultivars. They considered that the practice of separating isolates of 2.9. pv. phaseolicola into race 1 and 2 on the basis of their reaction to Red Mexican UT-3 only distinguished strains of bacteria with ditIerent degrees of virulence. Similar observations were reported by Szarka and Velich (1979). Some workers argue that the establishment of pathotypes on a host differential basis is subject to variation in inoculation techniques, environmental growth conditions, and the subjectivity of scoring for the disease (Coddington 91 91., 1987). Others feel that race designation is not valid because serological tests show that 2.9. pv. phaseolicola antiserum is not race specific (Guthrie, 1968). A 32P-labelled DNA probe carrying a gene(s) involved in phaseolotoxin production by 2.9. pv. phaseolicola has been used to detect and identify the bacterium in pure and mixed cultures. Hybridization tests were highly reliable and no race specificity was reported (Schaad e_t 91., 1989). Quantitative differences (virulence) have been related to variation in toxin production and in motility (Patel e_t a_l., 1964; Russell, 1975; Saettler e_t 91., 1981). Jensen and Livingstone (1944) and Johnson (1969) reported that halo-less 2.9. pv. phaseolicola isolates were less virulent than those that produced halos. Studies by Mulrean and Schroth (1979) indicated that motility in this pathogen may be regulated by chemicals produced by plant tissues in potential infection sites on leaves. Some researchers have attributed the variation in virulence of strains of halo blight bacteria to differences in motility. 13 Panopoulos and Schroth (1974) observed that motile strains caused up to twelve times as many lesions as non-motile stains. However, Msuku (1984) found no relationship between motility and virulence in a study of four pathotype groups in Malawian isolates of halo blight bacteria. This study also indicated that most of the group 1 isolates were obtained from warmer areas as opposed to the more virulent isolates in groups 2, 3, and 4, which were obtained from cooler areas of Malawian bean growing regions. The author noted that with an exception of one isolate in pathotype 4, all Malawian isolates serologically shared the same antigenic characteristies. Appearance of new virulent strains has been attributed to a number of factors. These include genetic changes in the pathogen that has long occupied a given area, introduction of an organism into a new area, and changes in the cropping systems which affect the ecological niche of the pathogen (Buruchara, 1983; Schuster and Coyne, 19753). Studies have also indicated that the virulence of a bacterial population was increased through mutation and selection during passage through a resistant host (Buruchara, 1983). In other host-pathogen systems variation in pathogenicity may also evolve with the host genotype. Correa (1987), using isozyme studies, suggested that each pathogen population is subject to a selection pressure in favor of one allele or another, probably depending on the genotypes serving as hosts. Sypergism Synergism between 2.9. pv. phaseolicola and Uromyces M (Reben) Wint., the bean rust pathogen, has been reported (Schwartz, 1989). Yarwood (1969) observed that lesion size became larger when plants were infected with a bean rust pathogen followed by infection with halo blight bacteria. Lesion numbers may also be increased by inoculating 2.9. pv. phaseolicola mixed with Achromobacter sp. (Maino, 1972). 14 Cultural control Halo blight bacteria are known to survive between growing seasons in bean debris on the soil surface and on volunteer beans (Schuster and Coyne, 1975b). Deep plowing and crop rotation are thus recommended to reduce initial inoculum. The pathogen is also seed-borne. In order to reduce initial inoculum density, the use of pathogen-free seed produced under conditions unfavorable to the bacterium is highly recommended (Schwartz, 1989; Zaumeyer and Thomas, 1957). Clean seed production is a major method for controlling halo blight and other bean bacterial diseases in the U.S.A., where clean seeds are produced in the arid west under irrigation. The production of clean seed in the arid west (Idaho) depends on field inspection for visible evidence of plant infection, laboratory inoculation of susceptible pods with suspensions from seed lots, serological tests and quarantine to prevent importation of bean seed from areas where the pathogen exists (Schwartz, 1989). Seeds should also be thoroughly cleaned of dust after threshing because they can be contaminated by halo blight bacteria present in powdered plant tissue. Contaminated seed can also be treated with chemicals, including antibiotics to kill bacteria present on the surface (Grogan and Kimble, 1967; Russell, 1975; Saettler _e_t 9]., 1981). While field inspection and roguing of diseased plants may help to ensure that seeds are pathogen free, contamination of seed may still occur, even when halo blight incidence is negligible,even in certain resistant cultivars (Allen, 1983; Katherman g1 91., 1980; Stadt and Saettler, 1981). Chemical control Various researchers have indicated that halo blight can be controlled chemically by foliar applications of Bordeaux mixture, copper oxychloride, copper sulfate, copper oxide, 15 streptomycin sulfate, or dihydro-streptomycin sulfate. These chemicals may be applied at 7 to 10 day intervals at rates of 200-400 g per 1000 square meters. Application may also be done at first flower and pod-set at the rate of 0.1 percent a.i. per 675 liters per hectare, to prevent spread and development of halo blight on leaves and pods (Hagedorn e_t 91., 1969; Ralph, ‘1976; Saettler and Potter, 1970; Taylor and Dudley, 1977, Zaumeyer and Thomas, 1957). Russell (1975) and Schwartz (1989) suggest that application of antibiotics to the foliage may induce the development of resistant mutants, and their use should therefore be avoided. Moreover, control of halo blight disease by use of chemicals may not always be practical in tropical areas (Allen, 1983). In addition, chemicals are relatively expensive for small holder growers in Tanzania and other developing countries, and may also be difficult to obtain (Saettler e_t 91., 1981), or to apply appropriately. Plant resistance The use of resistant varieties as a means to control halo blight has been successful in some areas of the world (Baggett and Frazier, 1967; Coyne _e_t_ a_l., 1967; Schwartz, 1989; Zaumeyer and Meiners, 1975). However, development of resistant varieties must take into account variability of both the pathogen and genetic resistance in the host. Independent genes separately govern leaf resistance, pod resistance and plant systemic chlorotic reactions (Baggett and Frazier, 1967; Coyne and Schuster, 1974; Coyne e_t 91., 1971). For example, pod susceptibility frequently occurs in plants which possess leaf resistance. However, linkage has been observed between the different genes that control leaf and plant systemic chlorotic reactions (Hill _e_t_ a_l., 1972). Breeding programs should, therefore, select germplasm which provides resistant reactions against leaf and pod infection, and in which the pathogen is non-systemic (Coyne and Schuster, 1974). 16 Plant resistance to 2.9. pv. p11£00_lic_ol_a has been reported to involve suppression of toxin production and inhibition of bacterial growth (Russell, 1977). Bean germplasm resistant to race 1 and 2 has been identified in field and greenhouse tests (Schwartz, 1989) and is under the control of both dominant and recessive genes. Dominant resistance to race 1 was reported in Red Mexican UI-3 by Patel and Walker (1966). Varieties Wisconsin HBR40 and 72 developed by Hagedorn 91 91,. (1974) are reported to be resistant to both races 1 and 2 of Psp, Xanthomonas plla9epli (common bacterial blight); 2.9. pv. 9vg'pga_e (bacterial brown spot), and various fungal pathogens. However, for successful long term control of halo blight disease, integrated control programs should be adopted (Schwartz, 1989). In an integrated control program, several disease control methods are employed, including regulatory inspections for healthy seed production, quarantine measures, cultural practices (rotation, sanitation), biological control (resistant varieties) and chemical control (seed treatment and foliage sprays). The optimum use of each of these control measures makes the others relatively more effective. However, such integrated disease control measures are most successful and economical when all relevant information regarding the crop, its pathogen, the environmental conditions expected to prevail, locality, availability of materials, and costs are taken into account. LITERATURE CITED Adam, DB. and AT Pugsley. 1934. Smooth-rough variation in Phytomonas medicaginis phaseolicola Burk. Austr. J. Expt. Biol. Med. Sci. 12:193-202. Allen, DJ. 1983. The Pathology of Tropical Food Legumes: Disease Resistance in Crop Improvement. John Wiley and Sons. Chichester. 413pp. Allen, DJ., M. Dessert, P. Ti'utmann, and J. Voss. 1989. Common beans in Africa and their constraints. pp. 9-31. I_n: Schwartz, HE and MA. Pastor-Corrales (Eds). Bean Production Problems in the Ti'opies. CIA'I; Cali, Colombia. 726pp. Baggett, J .R. and WA. Frazier. 1967. Sources of resistance to halo blight in Phaseolus vulgaris. Plant Dis. Reptr. 51:661-665. Bradbury, J.F. 1986. Guide to Plant Pathogenic Bacteria. CAB. International Mycological Institute. Kew. 332pp. Buddenhagen, I.W. 1965. The relation of plant pathogenic bacteria to the soil. pp. 269- 282. I_n: Baker, KB and WC. Snyder (Eds). Ecology of Soil-Borne Plant Pathogens, Prelude to Biological Control. John Murray, London. 571 pp. Burkholder, WH. 1926. A new disease of bean. Phytopathology 16:915-927. Buruchara, RA. 1983. Determination of Pathogenic Variation in Isariomis gr_1_s' cola Sacc. and Pseudomonas sm'ngae pv. phaseolicola (Burk.) Young, Dye & Wilkie. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Nairobi, Kenya. 188pp. Buruchara, RA. and MA. Pastor-Corrales. 1981. Variation, virulence of Psepcflnonas sm'ngae pv. phaseolicola on bean in Colombia. 19: Lozano, J.C. (Ed). Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Plant Pathogenic Bacteria. August 16-23. CIAT Cali, Colombia. pp. 341-351. CIAT 1981. Potential for field beans in eastern Africa. Proceedings of a Regional Workshop held in Lilongwe, Malawi. March 9-14. 1980. 226pp. CIA'II 1987. Annual Report. Bean Program. Working document No. 14, 1986, Cali, Colombia. 352pp. CIAT 1986. Bean Production Systems in Africa. CIAT Cali, Colombia. 16pp. CMI. 1965. Pseudomonas phaseolicola. Description of plant pathogenic fungi and bacteria. No. 45. 2pp. Coddington, A., P.M. Mathews, C. Cullis, and KH. Smith. 1987. Restriction digest pattern of total DNA from different races of Fusarium ommrum f.sp. p131, an improved method for race classification. J. Phytopathol. 118:9-20. 17 18 Corey, RR. and M.P. Starr. 1957. Colony types of Xanthomonas phaseoli. J. Bacteriol. 74:137-140. Correa, FJ. 1987. Pathogenic Variation, Production of Tbxin Metabolites, and Isozyme Analysis in Phaeoisariopsis gr_r_s' eola (Sacc.) Ferr. Ph.D. Dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing. 154pp. Coyne, DP. and M.L Schuster. 1974. Breeding and genetic studies of tolerance to several bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) bacterial pathogens. Euphytica 23:651-656. Coyne, D.P., M.L Schuster, and CC. Gallegos. 1971. Inheritance and linkage of the halo blight systemic chlorosis and leaf watersoaked lesions in Phaseolus vulgaris L variety crosses. Plant Dis. Reptr. 55:203-207. Coyne, D.P., M.L Schuster, and C. Erwin. 1979. Reaction of Phaseolus vulgaris germplasm to a new virulent strain of Pseudomonas phaseolicola Ann. Rept. Bean Improv. Coop. 22:20-21. Coyne, D.P., M.L Schuster, and R. Fast. 1967. Sources of tolerance and reaction of bean to races of halo blight bacteria. Plant Dis. Reptr. 51:20-24. CRSP. 1990. Summary Report for Sokoine University of Agriculture. Presented at the Bean/Cowpea Collaborative Research Support Program Research Meeting. University Place Holiday Inn, East Lansing. April 30—May 3 (Abstr.). Doudoroff, M. and NJ. Pallerozin. 1974. Genus I: Pseudomonas Migula 1894. pp. 217- 243. 19: Buchanan, RE. and NE. Gibbons (Eds). Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 8th Edition, Bailliéré, London. Edington, BR. 1990. The identification of race 1 of Pseudomonas m’ngae pv. phaseolicola in South Africa. Ann. Rept. Bean Improv. Coop. 33:171. Epton, H.A.S. and BJ. Deverall. 1965. Physiological races of Pseudomonas m’ngae pv. phaseolicola causing halo blight of beans. Plant Path. 14:53-54. Epton, H.S.A., D.C. Sigee, and M. Passmoore. 1977. The influence on pathogenicity of ultrastructural changes in Pseudomonas phaseolicola during lesion development. pp. 301-303. I_n: Kiraly, Z. (Ed). Current prics in Plant Pathology. Academial Kiado, Budapest. Ercolani, G.L, D.J. Hagedorn, and RE. Rand. 1974. Epiphytic survival of Pseudomonas m‘ngae on hairy vetch in relation to epidemiology of bacterial brown spot of bean in Wisconsin. Phytopathology 64:1330-1339. Ferguson, AR. and J.S. Johnston. 1980. Phaseolotoxin, chlorosis, ornithine accumulation and inhibition of ornithine carbamoyltransferase in different plants. Physiol. Plant Path. 16:269-275. 19 Gnanamanickam, SS. and SS. Patil. 1976. Bacterial growth, toxin production, and levels of ornithine carbamoyltransferase in resistant and susceptible cultivars of bean inoculated with Pseudomonas phaseolicola. Phytopathology 66:290-294. Gondwe, B. 1987. Halo blight of Phaseolus beans. pp. 70-74. 19: Salema, MP. and Minjas, A.N. (Eds). Bean Research 1. Proceedings of the Fifth Bean Research Workshop held at Sokaine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania, September 9-12, 1986. Benedictine Publications, Ndanda, Peramiho. 167pp. Grogan, RG. and KA. Kimble. 1967. The role of seed contamination in the transmission of Pseudomonas phaseolicola in Phaseolus vulgaris. Phytopathology 57:28-31. Guthrie, J.W. 1968. The selorogical relationship of races of Pseudomonas phaseolicola. Phytopathology 58:716-717. Hagedorn, D.J., E.K. Wade, and G. Weis. 1969. Chemical control of bean bacterial diseases in Wisconsin. Plant Dis. Reptr. 53:178-181. Hagedorn, D.J., J.C. Walker, and RE. Rand. 1974. Wis. HBR40 and Wis. HBR 72 bean germplasm. Hort. Sci. 9:402. Hale, C.N. and JD. Thylor. 1973. Races of Pseudomonas phaseolicola causing halo blight of beans in New Zealand. New Zealand J. Agric. Res. 167:147-149. Harper, 8., N. Zewdie, I.R. Brown, and J.W. Mansfield. 1987. Histological, physiological, and genetical studies of the responses of Pseudomonas gri_r_1g99 pv. phaseolicola and Pseudomonas m’ngae pv. coronafaciens. Physiol. Mol. Plant Path. 31:153-172. Hill K., D.P. Coyne, and M.L Schuster. 1972. Leaf, pod, and systemic chlorosis reactions in Phaseolus vulgaris to halo blight controlled by different genes. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 97:494-498. Jensen, J.H. and J .E. Livingstone. 1944. Variation in symptoms produced by isolates of Phy10monas medicaginis var. phaseolicola. Phytopathology 34:471-480. Johnson, J.C. 1969. Halo-less halo blight of French bean in Queensland. Queensland J. Agric. and Anim. Sci. 26:293-302. Karel, A.K., B.J. Ndunguru, M. Price, S.H. Semuguruka, and BB. Singh. 1981. Bean production in Thnzania. _I_r_1_: CIAT (Ed.). Potential of FiCId Beans in Eastern Africa. Proceedings of a Regional Workshop held in Lilongwe, Malawi, March 9-14, 1980. Cali, Colombia. 226p. Katherman, M.J., R.E. Wilkinson, and S.V. Beer. 1980. Resistance and seed infection in three dry bean cultivars exposed to a halo blight epidemic. Plant Dis. 64:857-859. 20 Kinyua, GK. and D. Mukunya. 1981. Variability in isolates of Pseudomonas phaseolicola (Burk.) Young, Dye and Wilkie in Kenya and genetic studies on resistance in dry food beans. pp. 352-357. I_p: Lozano, J.C. (Ed) Proc. Fifth Int. Conf. on Plant Pathogenic Bacteria, August 16-23, CIAT Cali, Colombia. Kovacs, N. 1956. Identification of Pseudomonas pyocyanin by the oxidase reaction. Nature 178:703. Leben, C. and J .P. Sleesman. 1982 Preservation of plant pathogenic bacteria on silica gel. Plant Dis. 66:327. Legard, DE. and HF Schwartz. 1987. Sources and management of Pseudomonas sm'ngae pv. phaseolicola and Pseudomonas m’ngae pv. m’ngae epiphytes on dry beans in Colorado. Phytopathology 77:15-3-1509. Maino, AL 1972. Degradation of bean cell walls during early stages of halo blight infections caused by Pseudomonas phaseolicola and interactions with Achromobzlcter sp. Phytopathology 62:775 (Abstr.) Mitchell, R.E. 1976. Isolation and structure of a chlorosis inducing toxin of Pseudomonas phaseolicola. Phytochem. 15:1941-1947. Mitchell, R.E. and R.L Bieleski. 1977. Involvement of phaseolotoxin in halo blight of beans. Transport and conversion to functional toxin. Plant Physiol. 60:723-729. Moffett, M.L 1983. Bacterial plant pathogens recorded in Australia. pp. 317-336. I_n: Fahy, PC. and GJ. Persley (Eds). Plant Bacterial Diseases, A Diagnostic Guide. Academic Press. Sydney New York London, 393pp. Moore, LW. and RV. Carlson. 1975. Liquid nitrogen storage of phytopathogenic bacteria. Phytopathology 65:246-250. Msuku, W.A.B. 1984. Pathogenic Variation in Malawian Isolates of Pseudomonas syg'ngae pv. phaseolicola (Burk.) Young, Dye and Wilkie and Implication for Breeding Disease Resistant Beans. Ph.D. Dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, 90pp. Mulrean, E.N. and M.N. Schroth. 1979. 19 vitro and 19 M chemotaxis by Pseudomonas phaseolicola. Phytopathology 69:1039 (Abstr.) Omer, M.E.H. and R.K.S. Wood. 1969. Growth of Pseudomonas phaseolicola in susceptible and in resistant bean plants. Ann. Appl. Biol. 63:103-116. Panopoulos, NJ. and M.N. Schroth. 1974. Role of flagela motility in the inversion of bean leaves by Pseudomonas syg'ngac pv. phaseolicola. Phytopathology 64:1389-1397. 21 Patel, RN. and J.C. Walker. 1965. Resistance in Phaseolus to halo blight. Phytopathology 55:889-894. Patel, RN. and J .C. Walker. 1966. Inheritance of tolerance to halo blight in beans. Phytopathology 56:681-682. Patel, P.N., J.C. Walker, D.J. Hagedorn, C. Deleon-Garcia, and M. Tbliz-Ortiz. 1964. Bacterial brown spot of beans in central Wisconsin. Plant Dis. Reptr. 48:335-337. Patil, S.S., LO. Pam, and WS. Sakai. 1972. Mode of action of the toxin from Pseudomonas phaseolicola part 1. Plant Physiol. 49:803-812. Peet, R.C., R.B. Lindgren, and NJ. Panopoulos. 1985. Molecular genetics of phaseolotoxin production and immunity of Pseudomonas m‘ngae pv. phaseolicola. pp. 487-497. I_n: Civerolo, E.L, A. Collmer, R.E. Davis, and AG. Gillaspie (Eds), Plant Pathogenic Bacteria. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Plant Pathogenic Bacteria, Maryland, June 2-7, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht. 1050pp. Poryazov, I. 1975. Physiological races of Pseudomonas 9m'ngae pv. phaseolicola (Burk.) Young, Dye & Wilkie in Bulgaria. Ann. Rept. Bean Improv. Coop. 18:57-58. Ralph, W. 1976. Pelleting seed with bacteriocides: The effect of streptomycin on seed- borne halo blight of French bean. Seed Sci. Technol. 4:325-332. Russell, RE. 1975. Variation in virulence of some streptomycin resistant mutants of Pseudomonas phaseolicola. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 39:175-180. Russell, RE. 1977. Observation on the i9 vitro growth and symptom production of Pseudomonas phaseolicola on Phaseolus vulgaris. J. Appl. Bacterial. 43:167-170. Saettler, AW. and HS. Potter. 1970. Chemical control of halo blight in field beans. Research Report No. 98. MSU Agric. Expt. Sta. Extension Bull. 8pp. Saettler, A.W., SJ. Stadt, and LT Pontius. 1981. Effect of inoculation time and cultivar on internal infection of bean seed by Pseudomonas phaseolicola. J. Seed Tbchnol. 6:23-30. Sands, D.C., M.N. Schroth, and DC. Hildebrand. 1970. Taxonomy of phytopathogenic pseudomonads. J. Bacteriol. 101:9-23. Schaad, N .W., H. Azaad, R.C. Peet and NJ. Panopoulos. 1989. Identification of Pseudomonas m’ngae pv. phaseolicola by a DNA hybridization probe. Phytopathology 79:903-907. 22 Schroth, M.N., V.B. Vitanza, and DC Hildebrand. 1971. Pathogenic and nutritional variation in the halo blight group of fluorescent pseudomonads of bean. Phytopathology 61:852-857. Schuster, M.L and DR Coyne. 1975a. Genetic variation in bean bacterial pathogens. Euphytica 24:143-147. Schuster, M.L and DP Coyne. 1975b. Survival factors of plant pathogenic bacteria. Research Bull. No. 268, Agric. Expt. Sta., University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA. 53pp. Schuster, M.L, D.P. Coyne, and ED. Kerr. 1965. New virulent strain of halo blight bacterium overwinters in the field. Phytopathology 55:1075 (Abstr.). Schuster, M.L, D.P. Coyne, and C. Smith. 1979. New strain of halo blight bacterium in Nebraska. Ann. Rept. Bean. Improv. Coop. 22:19-20. Schwartz, HF. 1980. Halo blight. pp. 175-182. 19: Schwartz, HP. and EG. Guillerno (Eds). Bean Production Problems. Disease, Insect, Soil and Climatic Constraints of Phaseolus vulgaris. CIAT Cali, Colombia, 424pp. Schwartz, HP. 1989. Halo blight. pp. 285-301. I_n_: Schwartz, H.E and MA. Pastor- Corrales (Eds). Bean Production Problems in the 'B'opics. 2nd Edition. CIAT Cali, Colombia, 726pp. Schwartz, HF. and DE. Legard. 1986. Bacterial Diseases of Beans. Colorado State University Serv. Act. Bull. 2941, 4pp. Schwartz, HP. and MA. Pastor-Corrales. 1989. Bean Production Problems in the Ti'0pics. 2nd Edition. CIAT; Cali, Colombia, 726pp. Silbernagel, MJ. and MJ. Mills. 1987. Halo blight of Phaseolus vulgaris. pp. 81-83. 19: Salema, MP. and Minjas, A.N. (Eds). Bean Research 3. Papers presented at a workshop held at Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania, September 9-12, 1986. Benedictine Publications, Ndanda, Peramiho, 167pp. Stadt, SJ. and AW. Saettler. 1981. Effect of host genotype on multiplication of Pseudomonas phaseolicola. Phytopathology 71:1307-1310. Starr, G.H. and CJ. Kercher. 1969. Passage of Pseudomonas phaseolicola in bean plants through sheep. Phytopathology 59:1976. Szarka, J. and I. Velich. 1979. A study of the aggressivity of isolates belonging to Pseudomonas sm'ngae pv. phaseolicola (Burkh.) Dowson. Ann. Rept. Bean Improv. Coop. 22:64-65. 23 Taylor, JD. 1970. Bacteriophage and serological methods for the identification of Pseudomonas phaseolicola (Burkh.) Dowson. Ann. Appl. Biol. 66:387-395. Taylor, J. D. and C. L Dudley. 1977. Effectiveness of late copper and streptomycin sprays for the control of halo blight of beans (Pseudomonas phaseolicola ). Ann. Appl. Biol. 85: 217-221. Taylor, J.D., C.L Dudley, and L Presly. 1979. Studies of halo blight seed infection and disease transmission in dwarf beans. Ann. Appl. Biol. 93:267-277. Taylor, J.D., D.M. Tbverson and J.H.C. Davis. 1987. Diseases of Phaseolus beans - biology, resistance and control (RO 007035; RO 032055). pp 63-64. 19: Inst. Hort. Res. Ann. Rept. Wellsborne, Warwick, England, 1986/87. Teri, J.M., M.J. Silbernagel and S. Nchirnbi. 1990. The SUA/WSU CRSP: A review of the progress in disease resistance. Paper Presented at the Bean Workshop Held at Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania. September 17-19. (Abstr.) Turner, J.G. and R.E. Mitchell. 1985. Association between symptom development and inhibition of ornithine carbamoyltransferase in bean leaves treated with phaseolotoxin. Plant Physiol. 79:468-473. Walker, J .C. and RN. Patel. 1964. Splash dispersal and wind as factors in epidemiology of halo blight of beans. Phytopathology 54:140-141. Wharton, AL 1967. Sources of infection by physiological races of Pseudomonas gm'ngae pv. phaseolicola in dwarf beans. Plant Path. 16:27-31. Yarwood, CE. 1969. Association of rust and halo blight on beans. Phytopathology 59:1302- 1305. Young, J.M., D.W. Dye, J.E Bradbury, C.G. Panagopoulos, and CE Robbs. 1978. A proposed nomenclature and classification for plant pathogenic bacteria. N.Z.J. Agric. Res. 21:153-177. Zaumeyer, WJ. 1932. Comparative pathological, histology of three bacterial diseases of bean. J. Agric. Res. 44:605-632. Zaumeyer, WJ. and J.P. Meiners. 1975. Disease resistance in beans. Ann. Rev. Phytopath. 13:313-334. Zaumeyer, WJ. and HR. Thomas. 1957. A Monographic Study of Bean Diseases and Methods of their Control. U.S.D.A. Agric. Techn. Bull. No. 868. 255pp. Chapter 2 PATHOGENTC VARIATION OF PSEUDOMONAS SYRINGAE PVI PHASEOLICOLA IN NORTHERN TANZANIA INTRODUCTION Pathogenic variation among populations of Pseudomonas m pv. phaseolicola is well known. Using 13 isolates Jensen and Livingstone ( 1944) were the first to demonstrate pathogenic variation in 2.9. pv. phaseolicola. Patel and Walker (1965) reported the occurrence of races 1 and 2 in the U.S.A. These races were characterized based on the reaction of inoculated bean cultivar Red Mexican UI-3, which is resistant to race 1 but susceptible to race 2. On the same basis, the occurrence of these two races has been reported in Tanzania and many other countries (Buruchara and Pastor-Corrales, 1981; Hale and Taylor, 1973; Kinyua and Mukunya, 1981; Silbernagel and Mills, 1987; Taylor _t _1., 1987). The existence of a new race in Nebraska, U.S.A. was first suggested by Schuster 91 91., ( 1979) and Coyne 91 91., (1979), who recovered new strains of halo blight bacteria which were virulent to the usually resistant Great Northern bean cultivars such as Great Northern 111-59 and California Pink. Recently, Taylor 91 a_l., (1987) confirmed the erdstence in Africa, of race 3 of 2.9. pv. phaseolicola, which was virulent on bean cultivars with a single gene for resistance derived from cultivar Red Mexican UI-3. Race 3 caused a hypersensitive reaction in the cultivar Tendergreen, which is susceptible to races 1 and 2. Resistance to race 3 has been found to be governed by a single dominant gene, which is also present in several cultivars of U.S.A. origin such. as Seafarer and Thadercrop (Harper 91 91., 1987). DJ. Allen (personal communication) indicated that race 3 occurs in Colombia. 26 Breeding for halo blight resistance is generally considered the best method of control, and the use of resistant varieties as a means to control halo blight has been successful in some areas of the world (Baggett and Frazier, 1967; Coyne 91 a_l., 1967; Hagedorn 91 91., 1974; Schwartz, 1989). However, the development of resistant varieties must take into account variability of both the pathogen and the genetic resistance in the host. Therefore, a knowledge of the distribution of races of halo blight bacteria is important in relation to programs of breeding resistant bean varieties, including those in Tanzania. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to investigate races of 2.9. pv. phaseolicola prevailing in northern Tanzania and their survival ability under different field conditions. Information generated from this study will be very useful for bean breeding programs for disease resistance, and their development will also provide an alternative management tool for halo blight disease in the country. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sampling and isolation To determine the relative prevalence of races of 2.9. pv. phaseolicola in Arusha and Kilimanjaro regions, northern Tanzania (Fig. 1) where halo blight is one of the important diseases of beans, a survey was conducted during the period of November 1988 to February, 1990. Samples were collected periodically at random from several farmers’ bean fields. A total of 118 isolates were collected. Isolations were made from diseased plant material with halo blight-like symptoms. Pieces of diseased tissue including small areas of surrounding healthy tissue were excised and surface-sterilized for 1 minute in 2.6% NaOCl and rinsed in sterile distilled water. The pieces were crushed on flame-sterilized glass slides containing one or 2 drops of sterile distilled water. Using a sterile wire loop, the resulting suspensions 27 g g J g‘ 28 were streaked onto medium B of King 91 91. (1954) (KMB). F1uorescing colonies were purified by a series of single colony transfers and their identity confirmed by biochemical and physiological tests using procedures of Lelliot 91 91. (1966); pathogenicity tests on Canadian Wonder bean seedlings; carbon source utilization tests (Schaad, 1988) using mannitol, sorbitol and inositol; ice nucleation activity using the single temperature droplet method of Lindow (1988) and Lindow 91 91. (1978, 1982) at -5°C; sensitivity to bacteriophage and serology. Bacteriophage tests Sensitivity to bacteriophage was tested using the method described by J .D. Taylor and D.M. Thverson (personal communication), as follows. Three bacteriophages (11P, 12P, 48P), specific to 2.9. pv. phaseolicola, were used. Log phase cultures of each isolate grown on KMB and nutrient agar were used. Thick bacterial suspensions were prepared by adding 4 ml nutrient broth to each slant culture. Two to 3 drops of the resulting bacterial suspension of each isolate were added to glass vials containing 2.5 ml of sterile soft glycerol agar (SGA) (g/l:proteose peptone (Sigma), 5.0; yeast extract (Difco), 3.0; glycerol, 20 ml; Bacto-agar, 7.0) maintained molten in a water bath at 45-50°C. Suspensions were thoroughly mixed and poured on cool, solidified nutrient agar plates, followed by swirling gently to allow a thin layer of SGA with bacterial suspension to form over the plate. Plates were dried in a laminar flow chamber. One 5-ul drop of each bacteriophage was applied to the surface of the medium at designated spots and the drops were allowed to dry on a laboratory bench. Plates were then incubated upside down for 24-48 hours after which results were recorded. Each isolate was replicated three times. Clear zones (plaques) due to lysis of bacterial cells by phages indicated a positive 2.9. pv. phaseolicola identity. Three 29 tests were conducted for each bacterial isolate, and reference strains 1299A and 1375A were included as positive controls. Serology 2.9. pv. phaseolicola antisera was provided by Dr. J.D. Taylor. The agglutination method of J .D. Taylor and D.M. Thverson (personal communication) was used. One 0.07- ml drop of the antiserum was placed on a clean glass microscope slide, and a small amount of 24-48 hour bacterial growth picked up with a platinum wire loop was mixed into the drop of the antiserum, which was stained pink. Agglutination was observed against a light colored background. Occurrence of agglutination was recorded as positive. Three tests were conducted for each isolate. Reference strains Reference strains of 2.9. pv. phaseolicola (882, 1281A, 1299A, 1301A, 1302A and 1375A) were included in this investigation. Bacteriophage, antisera, and reference strains were provided by Dr. J .D. Taylor (Institute of Horticultural Research, Wellsborne, Warwick, England). Storage of Isolates Bacterial isolates were maintained as very thick suspensions in glycerol:0.1M phosphate buffer (50:50, v/V) and on nutrient agar slants at 0°C in an incubator (A. Gallenkamp and Co., London). Isolates were also stored in bean leaf powder in sterile vials at room temperature (22 9; 2°C) in darkness. The three storage methods were used to reduce the chances of loss of viability. 30 Soil sterilization Soil used for screen house experiments was heat-sterilized by exposing soil to a high temperature kerosene flame (198°C) using a Tbrra Force Tarralizer (Kent Horticultural Engineers, Kent, England). A forest soil/sand mixture (2/1, v/v) was used. The two soil components were mixed and sieved to remove gravel and debris before the sterilization process. Growing of plants All plants used in this study were grown in the screen house in 16 cm-diameter sterile plastic pots or in 7 x 8 x 22 cm3 sterile plastic flats containing a sterile mixture of forest soil/sand. Plants were maintained at temperatures ranging from 19 to 27°C and a natural 12 i 0.5 hour day-length, and watered as required with tap water. The halo blight susceptible cultivar, Canadian Wonder, was used as a control throughout the study. Inoculum preparation Each 2.9. pv. phaseolicola isolate was grown on KMB for 24-48 hours at 24 i 2°C. Suspensions were made by adding 0.01 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, to each culture and dislodging the bacteria. Concentrations of bacterial suspensions were adjusted turbidimetrically to contain about 107 -10° colony forming units (CFU) per ml. Race identification Races were determined from pod and foliage reactions of four differential bean cultivars. These were Canadian Wonder (universal susceptible), Edmund (universal resistant), Red Mexican UI-3 (resistant to race 1) and Tandergreen (resistant to race 3). 31 Pathogen-free seeds of these differential bean cultivars were provided by Dr. M.J. Silbernagel (USDA/ARS, Prosser, WA) and were then multiplied at Lyamungu Agricultural Research Station, Moshi, Tanzania. For leaf reaction, 7-10 day old seedlings containing fully expanded primary leaves were injected with bacterial suspensions at the first node using a sterile 25 gauge needle attached to a sterile 100C hypodermic syringe. Following needle inoculation, bean seedlings were also spray-inoculated abaxially with bacterial suspensions without water-soaking, using a half-liter plastic hand-operated atomizer. After inoculation, plants were covered with a plastic bag for 24 hours in the screen house and observed for halo blight symptom development during the following 10 days. Each single plant was considered a replicate and six plants were used for each isolate; two experiments were conducted. Pod reactions were determined using procedures of Ekpo (1975). Pods at the flat stage were harvested, surface-sterilized, rinsed and dried aseptically on sterile filter papers. Three pods from each differential bean cultivar were inoculated by placing a S-ul drop of inoculum at three sites per pod, followed by pricking the pod five times through the inoculum drop to a depth of about 1.0 m using a 25-gauge sterile disposable needle. Inoculated pods were placed side by side in 7 x 8 x 22 cm3 plastic flats containing moist filter papers with the inoculated side up and incubated for 7-10 days. Data were compiled from two repeated experiments. Isolates of known 2.9. pv. phaseolicola races and sterile phosphate buffer were included as positive and negative controls, respectively. Temxrature studies Tb determine the efl‘ect of temperature on growth of 2.9. pv. phaseolicola races, growth studies were conducted on Km agar plates. Plates were inoculated in quadruplicate 32 with different serial dilutions of each race. After inoculation, plates were placed upside down in an incubator (Fi-totron 600H, Fisons Environmental Equipment, Loughborough, England) without light, at 24, 28 and 34°C with a temperature variation of _-_l-_ 2°C. At 28 and 34°C, humidity in the incubator was adjusted at 70% to avoid excessive drying of agar plates. Colony diameter was measured after 4-5 days. The ability to produce a brown diffusible pigment at different temperatures on KMB and NA was also examined by growing the isolates producing the pigment at the above mentioned temperatures. Subjective pigment production determinations were recorded during the following 5 days. Surviv91 studies Survival of races 1 and 2 of halo blight bacteria was studied following the procedures of Saettler 91 91. (1986) and Groth and Braun (1989). Three sites were chosen representing different ecological environments in which beans are grown in Arusha and Kilimanjaro regions. The coffee/banana intercrop environment was also included. Three cultivars, Canadian Wonder (susceptible), Masai Red (slightly susceptible) and GO 7928 (resistant) were grown in 10 m rows in the field at Lyamungu and Monduli in March, 1989. Plants were inoculated twice with race 1 (isolate #2) or race 2 (isolate #4) 18 and 30 days after planting. Control plants grown 25 m away were left uninoculated. Severely halo blight diseased plants were collected in early June, air-dried at room temperature and separated into leaves and stems. Some plants were left standing in the field. Stems with typical halo blight symptoms were cut into pieces 2-3 cm long. Samples of leaves (0.5g) and stems (10 pieces) were placed in fine-mesh nylon bags and tied with nylon threads. A different color of nylon-mesh was used for each race to avoid mixing the two races, and within a race threads of different colors were used to distinguish cultivars. Samples were then taken to 33 the field at the end of June, the end of the main bean growing season. Half of the samples were placed 2-5 cm beneath the soil surface and the remaining half placed at 25 cm depth. Samples of each race were separated by a distance of 10 m. Healthy control samples were placed 5 m away from diseased samples. Diseased samples were also stored in the laboratory at 22 i 2°C for a similar period. At monthly intervals starting in July, when beans are usually harvested, three samples for each race and for each plant part, including samples from standing plants, were retrieved. Samples for standing plants included stem tissue and fallen leaves. After removing the nylon mesh, samples were ground in sterile mortars and pestles and 10 ml of sterile phosphate buffer added. The resulting suspensions were left to stand for 15 minutes followed by a 2-minute centrifugation at 20,000xg using a Marusan centrifuge (Sekuma Seisakusho Ltd., Tbkyo, Japan) to sediment the plant debris. The supernatants were diluted serially and plated in triplicate on KMB agar containing cycloheximide (100 ug/ml). Plates were observed under UV light after 4-5 days of incubation. For each sampling period, 5 presumed 2.9. pv. phaseolicola colonies were purified by single colony transfers and tested for sensitivity to bacteriophage and for pathogenicity on 7-10 day-old Canadian Wonder been seedlings, by injecting stems and by infiltrating leaves with suspensions of approximately 107 cfu/ml. Plants were incubated in the screen house and observed for halo blight symptom development for up to 14 days. Soil pH measurements Soil pH for each placement site at each geographical location was measured electrometrically using a pH meter (BIL-7015, Kent Industrial Measurements Ltd., England) at the time of sample placement in the field and at monthly intervals when samples were retrieved. Three soil samples were taken for each placement depth. 34 Volunteer bean plants During the bean growing season, farmers’ fields with severe halo blight symptoms were identified. Volunteer bean plants from such fields and around farmers’ backyards in Monduli (November-December) and at Lyamungu (September-October) were observed for the presence of halo blight symptoms. Isolation attempts were made from suspect plants as described earlier. Presumed 2.9. pv. phaseolicola colonies which were fluorescent were subject to biochemical, pathogenicity and bacteriophage tests for species identification. Confirmed 2.9. pv. phaseolicola colonies were tested on the four bean differential cultivars for race identification. Weather data Rainfall and temperatures for Lyamungu and Monduli were obtained from the agrometeorology section at the Agricultural Research Institute, Lyamungu, Moshi, and from the Monduli District Agricultural Development office, respectively. RESULTS Prevailing races Within the two regions surveyed in northern Tanzania (Fig. 2), three pathogenic races of halo blight bacteria were distinguished based on the reaction of the four differential bean cultivars used. The distribution of these races in the surveyed area is shown in Table 1. Race 2 was the most prevalent of the three races in the area, followed by race 1; race 3 occurred at a very low frequency (Fig. 3). Besides producing the usual blue-green diffusible pigment, some race 2 isolates also produced a brown diffusible 35 pigment, which was more pronounced on nutrient agar than on KMB. Such isolates were designated as race 2P (Table 1 and Fig. 3). Race 2P isolates occurred infrequently, and were restricted to Lambo, Kilimanjaro region and Monduli and Selian in Arusha regions. The bean cultivars from which race 2P isolates were obtained included Canadian Wonder, the breeding line FB-GP307-2 and other local varieties. Brown diffusible pigment production could be detected as early as 48 hours on nutrient agar and after 4-5 days on KMB. The delayed appearance of the pigment on KMB might be due to the masking effect by the blue-green diffusible pigment which is produced in large quantities on this medium. The brown diffusible pigment-producing isolates were not distinguishable from other race 2 isolates that did not produce the pigment, based on biochemical and physiological tests. Race 2P isolates induced a reaction similar to that of race 2 on foliage and on pods of the four differential bean cultivars used. All race 2 isolates obtained from bean debris collected from farmers’ fields in Monduli in November, 1988 and September, 1989 were highly virulent and produced very large water-soaked lesions on the cultivar Tandergreen. They also induced stunting and extensive systemic chlorosis in the resistant differential cultivar Edmund. However, no water- soaked lesions were produced in Edmund and inoculated leaves produced a hypersensitive reaction (Fig. 4). By contrast, race 2 isolates obtained from halo blight-infected bean plants produced only a hypersensitive reaction on Edmund. Temperature studies The growth responses of different isolates of the three races of halo blight bacteria are shown in Table 2. Growth of all races did not differ much at 24 i 2 and 28 i 2°C. However, 2 out of 3 race 2P isolates were able to grow at 34 :1; 2°C. These isolates also 36 Fig. 2. Origin of Pseudomonas yfingae pv. phaseolicola isolates in northern Tanzania. 1 = Lambo, 2 = Lyamungu, 3 = Kilema, 4 = Miwaleni, 5 = Sanya Juu, 6 = Tangeru, 7 = Selian, 8 = Monduli. 37 38 1; 50- w ; 32) 4o~— g m / a / 8 % E 30‘" Z fllIIIHIZP g é E 20—~ g - / “J / ‘I —— ¢ 10 ¢ / . , // , r1 , ‘ 1 2 3 RACE Fig. 3. Relative frequency of races 1, 2 and 3 of Pseudomonas mingae pv. phaseolicola in collections made in Arusha and Kilimanjaro regions, northern Tanzania from November, 1988 to February, 1990. Frequencies are expressed as percentages of the total number of isolates collected. 2P represents race 2 isolates producing brown-diffusible pigment. 39 Table 1. Distribution of races of Pseudomonas m‘ngae pv. phaseolicola in Arusha and Kilimanjaro regions, northern Tanzania. Altitude Tbtal No. Number of isolates of race Location (m) of isolates 1 2 2P 3 Arusha Monduli 1630 39 8 26 3 2 Selian 1387 45 27 16 1 1 Tengeru ? 2 2 -° - - Kilimanjaro Lambo 1020 13 3 8 2 — Lyamungu 1268 13 12 1 - - Kilema 1422 4 — 4 — — Miwaleni 765 - - - - — N arumu 1268 1 - 1 - - Sanya J uu 1400 1 1 - - - Total 118 53 56 6 3 ? Information on altitude lacking. ‘- Represents absence of indicated race among 2.9. pv. phaseolicola isolates. Fig. 4. Stunting and systemic chlorosis symptoms produced by race 2 isolates obtained from bean debris in Monduli, Arusha region northern Tanzania on a resistant differential bean cultivar, Edmund. 41 Table 2. Influence of temperature on growth of representative isolates of races of Pseudomonas m’ngae pv. phaseolicola on KMB. Mean colony diameter (mm) at temgrature (°C)“' Race Isolate No. 24 _+_- 2 28 i 2 34 i 2 1 50 3.6 _+_- 0.2 2.7 i 0.2 -" 1 70 2.5 :1; 0.2 2.4 i 0.1 - 2 12 2.7 i 0.2 2.6 :l_- 0.1 - 2 882’ 22:20.4 2.1 i 0.2 — 2 1299A" 2.6 i 0.0 2.4 i 0.1 - 2P2 5 2.3 _+_ 0.1 2.5 i 0.1 3.0 _-l_-_ 0.2 2Pz 19 2.5 i 0.1 2.4 5; 0.0 2.3 i 0.1 2Pz 44 2.5 i 0.2 2.4 i 0.0 - 3 46 2.6 i 0.1 2.4 i 0.1 - 3 1302Ay 2.6 i 0.1 2.3 i 0.2 - ”Values are means of four replications :1; standard errors. "- = No growth was observed. YIsolates were kindly supplied by Dr. J .D. Taylor, Institute of Horticultural Research, Wellsborne, Warwick, England. z2P = Race 2 brown-diffusible pigment producing isolates. 42 produced the brown diffusible pigment at all three temperatures. The pigment was easily seen on nutrient agar plates due to the absence of the blue-green diffusible pigment which occurs on KMB. Survival studies The ability of 2.9. pv. phaseolicola to survive in bean debris buried in the soil and in standing bean plants left in the field varied depending upon the race, geographical location, depth of debris placement and the bean genotype used. Mthin the same bean genotype 2.9. pv. phaseolicola survived for a longer period in stems than in leaf debris. For example, at Ngarash, Monduli, Arusha region, race 1 survived for 5 months in Canadian Wonder stem debris and only 4 months in foliage debris (Table 3). This race also survived well for 5 months at Monduli in standing bean plants and in bean debris placed in soil at a depth of 2-5 cm, while it survived for only 3 months when debris was placed 25 cm deep. On the other hand, at the same location race 2 survived in stems of cultivar Canadian Wonder one month longer than race 1 (Table 3). Race 2 was readily recovered from bean stem tissue samples of plants left standing in the field and those buried at 2-5 cm throughout the 6 month period (July to December). In all cases, the susceptible cultivar, Canadian Wonder, supported longer survival of halo blight bacteria, probably due to more inoculum present, than the other bean genotypes used. Pathogenicity tests and sensitivity to bacteriophages 11P, 12F and 48P confirmed the identity of recovered isolates as 2.9. pv. phaseolicola. . In the coffee/banana intercrop environment at Lyamungu survival of halo blight bacteria declined rapidly in bean plants left standing after the harvest season and in bean debris buried in the soil. Race 1 was recovered after only 1 month in leaves and 2 months 43 Table 3. Survival of Pseudomonas mingae pv. phaseolicola races 1 and 2 in infected bean debris represented by standing plants and debris buried for 6 months at two depths under field conditions at Ngarash, Monduli, Arusha region and at Lyamungu, Kilimanjaro region, northern Tanzania. S9rvival duration (mom) Standing plants 2-5 cm deep 25 cm deep Location Race Genotype" Leaves Stems Leaves Stems Leaves Stems Monduli" 1 CW 4 5 4 5 2 3 MR 2 3 2 2 1 1 607928 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 CW 5 6 5 6 2 4 MR 2 3 2 2 1 1 G07928 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lyamunguy 1 CW 1 2 0 0 0 0 MR 0 2 0 0 0 0 G07928 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 CW 2 3 0 0 0 0 MR 1 2 0 0 0 0 607928 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lyamunguz 1 CW 2 3 1 1 0 0 MR 1 2 0 0 0 0 G07928 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 CW 2 3 1 1 0 0 MR 2 2 0 1 0 0 G07928 0 0 0 0 0 0 "CW = Canadian Wonder (susceptible), MR = Masai Red (slightly susceptible), G07928 = breeding line (resistant). xField used for the study was cultivated to maize the previous year. yThe field was under coffee/banana association, and no bean crop had been grown in the field. 2The field used was under fallow the previous 3 years. 44 in stems of standing plants of cultivars Canadian Wonder and Masai Red, whereas race 2 remained viable for 2 and 3 months in foliage and stems of standing plants, respectively. The two races (1 and 2) were not recovered from debris of either bean genotype after 1 month burial at 2-5 cm and at 25 cm deep (Table 3). In the field left fallow the previous 3 years at Lyamungu, races 1 and 2 of 2.9. pv. phaseolicola were recovered after 2 and 3 months in leaves and stems, respectively, of cultivar Canadian Wonder left standing in the field. In samples placed at 2-5 cm depth, race 1 was viable for 1 month (July) only in Canadian Wonder, while race 2 survived for the same duration in Canadian Wonder and in stem pieces of Masai Red (Table 3). As in the coffee/banana intercrop environment, halo blight bacteria were not detected after 1 month in samples buried at 25 cm beneath the soil surface, the normal plowing depth. At both geographical locations (Monduli and Lyamungu), the pathogen remained viable for a longer period in plants left standing in the field than in buried debris (Table 3). Comparing the two locations, however, 2.9. pv. phaseolicola survived for a longer period at Ngarash, Monduli than at Lyamungu. In dry infected debris stored in the laboratory at 22 i 2°C, the bacterium remained viable for more than 8 months in cultivars Canadian Wonder and Masai Red. However, in the resistant line, 607928, both races were detected at very low numbers only at the beginning of the experiment in June; thereafter the pathogen was not detected. pH values During the period of the survival study, the soil pH values at N garash, Monduli ranged from 6.8-6.9 at both placement depths. In the field under the coffee/banana intercrop at Lyamungu, pH values ranged from 4.6 in July to 6.2 in September for the 45 topsoil, and from 4.7 in July to 6.3 in September for the 25 cm depth. The field left fallow the previous 3 years had pH values ranging from 4.9 to 5.0 for the two placement depth for July and September, respectively. At Lyamungu the low pH in July may be attributed to ammonium sulfate which is applied as a nitrogen fertilizer for coffee. Volunteer plants 2.9. pv. phaseolicola was recovered from infected foliage of volunteer bean plants in two farmers’ fields in Monduli and around several backyards at Lyamungu. Due to high moisture content in the soil, shatter loss bean seeds germinated almost immediately after harvest (July/August) at Lyamungu. However at Monduli, where the soil moisture was very low due to lack of rain, most of the shatter loss bean seeds remained dormant in the field until October/November when soil moisture conditions allowed germination. Volunteer bean plants around farmers’ backyards arose from seeds dropped or discarded during threshing. Weather data Rainfall and temperature changes at Monduli and at Lyamungu from June to December are shown in Fig. 5 and Fig. 6, respectively. Lyamungu received rain throughout the survival study period (J une-December, 1989). On the Other hand, Monduli remained dry for most of this period and received little or no rain until November and December (Fig. 5). The monthly mean maximum temperature at Lyamungu ranged from 20.5 to 26.5°C and the monthly mean minimum temperature ranged from 12.5 to 15°C. Figure 5. Monthly rainfall from June to December at Monduli for 1989 and mean monthly rainfall for 3 years (1986-1988). Numbers above each bar represent number of rain days during the indicated month. RAINFALL (MM) R50 1 woo 1 N00 .. Loo- D Ammo E >0m Om w _z_u>_._. amznmmficmm D 58 ll. :92 z>x§c§ 68 g §m>z Om mm z _<=Z=<_C_<_ homo I §m>z _<_>x=<_CZ_ mm z Z:Z=<_C_<_ mm rt IIIII . z_ozoofio.U wcmmpom 2.020032v O b I O O m w m m a.» «m O>._._OZ 3 N LOG CFU/G FRESH WEIGHT (INTERNAL) 102 103 Figure 2. Surface and internal p0pulation dynamics of Pseudomonas sy9'ngae pv. phaseolicola race 1 on and in bean foliage in two bean cropping systems at Lyamungu, Kilimanjaro region, northern Tanzania. Bars indicate standard errors of the means. LOG CPU/0M2 LEAF AREA (SURFACE) 8 3 m: ,m a. -m a. L. m . _zammomgU _zqmmomQu - m sin...» mcmfiom oil... .. _zammzz. gOZOOmQu 7820030“. .. T 5 O O o d a d u 4 d o o a m o a a O>m._.mm _ZOOCCKZOZ LOG CFU/G FRESH WEIGHT (INTERNAL) 104 105 monocrop and bean/maize intercrop systems, respectively. Thereafter, surface populations declined sharply; monocrop populations reached a level significantly lower than intercrop populations at 12 days, and then suddenly increased to a level not significantly different (2 = 0.05) from that of the intercrop system at 15 days after inoculation. While internal population patterns were similar in both systems, maximum bacterial populations generally tended to be lower in the bean monocrop than in the bean/maize intercrop system. At 15 days after inoculation the difference was about 100-fold and was significantly different (9 = 0.05). Internal populations reached a maximum of 8.3 log10 units/g fresh weight at 12 days after inoculation in the bean monocropping system, then declined at 15 days. Bacterial populations in bean leaves in the intercrop system increased to 9 log1o units at 15 days. In both cropping systems internal Ls. pv. phaseolicola populations increased steadily except at 15 days after inoculation. Populations of Rs. pv. phaseolicola on and in maize In contrast to behavior on and in bean leaves, internal populations of Ls. pv. phaseolicola in maize plants grown alone or in association with bean, decreased throughout the sampling period both at Lambo and at Lyamungu (Figs. 3 and 4). At Lambo, practically no internal bacteria were detected in maize leaves 6 days after inoculation in both cropping systems. In the maize monocropping system surface Ls. pv. phaseolicola populations also declined rapidly and were not detected 6 days after inoculation. However, in the bean/maize intercrop system, surface populations on maize leaves increased slightly 3 days after inoculation, then maintained a fairly constant population of 2.8 log1o units/cm2 leaf area until 9 days and then declined to undetectable concentrations at 15 days. 106 Figure 3. Surface and internal population dynamics of Pseudomonas _svg'ngae pv. phaseolicola race 1 on and in maize foliage in monocrop and intercrop systems at Lambo, Kilimanjaro region,northern Tanzania. Bars indicate standard errors of the means. LOG CFU/CM2 LEAF AREA (SURFACE) a 8 . _zammomom. . Ell-I" _zqmmz>r m 2.058% n .P I rm _zammomQu - mcmm>om oil... I 26200an a. o s .m L w a. L v \mnniimiin / N- Ill W rm I i I 1 I I / o . J I o o w m o E a O>_u._.mm _ZOOCFPdOZ LOG CFU/G FRESH WEIGHT (INTERNAL) 107 108 Figure 4. Surface and internal population dynamics of Pseudomonas m'ngae pv. phaseolicola race 1 on and in maize foliage in monocrop and intercrop systems at Lyamungu, Kilimanjaro region, northern Tanzania. Bars indicate standard errors of the means. LOG CFU/CM2 LEAF AREA (SURFACE) do do Edd—£030."v Till} m .. _zammzz. szozoowon . m L _ZHMDODOU u ' | | I . mcmfi>0m a . £028an .. m o) 6 o w m o S.» a o>3mm _zooc_.>:oz LOG CFU/G FRESH WEIGHT (INTERNAL) 109 110 At Lyamungu, population dynamies of fig. pv. phaseolicola were similar to those at Lambo. Internal populations in the maize monocrop decreased rapidly and were not detected after 6 days (Fig. 4). Internal populations in the bean/maize intercropping system declined more slowly, but were not detected after 9 days. On the other hand, surface p0pulations increased to a maximum of about 3.4 log1o units/cmz at 3 days after inoculation and then declined (Fig. 4). The bacterium was not detected on maize after 9 days in the maize monocrop but remained at ca. 2 log10 units/cm2 through day 12 in the bean/maize intercrop system. In all cases colony samples of Rs. pv. phaseolicola which were taken randomly and tested for pathogenicity on Canadian Wonder bean seedlings were pathogenic and produced typical halo blight symptoms within 8-10 days after inoculation. Leaf and M disease ratings Foliage disease severity was evaluatedtwice, at 10 and 25 days after inoculation, and pod disease severity was rated once at pod physiological maturity. The mean disease severity ratings plus/minus their standard errors for the two locations are shown in Table 1. Halo blight severity at Lambo was similar for the two cropping systems. However, at Lyamungu, halo blight was slightly, but not significantly, more severe (_13 = 0.05) in the bean monocrop system than in the bean/maize intercrop system. In contrast, however, pod disease severity at both locations was more severe in the bean/maize association than in the monocropping system, although differences were not significant. At Lambo, the proportion 111 Table 1. Halo blight disease severity ratings for foliage and pods of Canadian Wonder bean in two bean cropping systems in northern Tanzania. Mean disease severig ratings" Location Plant part _D_aEZ Monocrop Intercrop Lambo Leaves 10 4.3 i 0.2 4.2 t 0.2 25 6.8 :t 0.4 6.8 i 0.4 Podsz 3.8 t 0.2 5.0 i 0.3 Lyamungu Leaves 10 4.0 i 0.0 3.8 i 0.3 25 7.2 i 0.2 6.2 :L- 0.2 Podsz 4.8 t. 0.3 6.0 i- 0.3 xValues are means of three replicates : standard errors of the means. Disease severity indices ranged from 1 = no disease to 9 = very severe disease, with 50% or more of leaf area covered with lesions. YDays after inoculation. zDisease severity rating on pods was done at pod physiological maturity with a scale of 1- 9 where 1 = no disease and 9 = very severe disease, with 50% or more of pod area covered with lesions. 112 of pod area covered with lesions in the intercropping system exceeded that in the monocrop system by 24% while at Lyamungu the difference was 20%. Retention of moisture on leaves Leaves of beans growing in the intercrop system required 2.8 hours to dry after rain as compared with 2.0 hours for the bean monocrop, a difference of 40% (Table 2). Such differences were not observed for maize in the two cropping systems. Maize leaves required about 2 hours longer to dry than bean leaves. Climatological data Rainfall totals for April and May at Lambo were 242.1 and 201.2 mm, respectively (Fig. 5). However, the 53 year rainfall averages were 209.0 mm for April and 161.7 mm for May. Temperatures at the same location in April ranged from 17.1 to 27.4°C, which almost agreed with the range of 53 years, which was 18.1 to 27.1°C. In May however, temperatures ranged from 17.4 to 27.7°C as compared to 17.6 to 249°C, the average range of 53 years. On the other hand, Lyamungu received 303.1 and 810.6 mm of rain for April and May, rCSpectively (Fig. 6). The means of 53 year rainfalls for the same months were 502.3 and 414.1 mm, respectively. TCmperatures at Lyamungu were cooler than those at Lambo and ranged from 15.2 to 23.9°C for April and 15.1 to 222°C for May. The 53 year average ranged from 15.8 to 246°C for April and 13.0 to 222°C for May. Rainfall and temperatures at both locations decreased progressively towards the end of the growing season. Population dynamics studies of Ls, pv. phaseolicola were conducted during the period of April and May. 113 Table 2. Time required for visible moisture on bean and maize leaves to dry following cessation of rain at Lyamungu, Kilimanjaro region, northern Tanzania. Cropping sgtem Qrgp Time (hours)z MonocrOp Bean 2.0 t 0.2 Maize 4.3 t 0.3 Intercrop Bean 2.8 :1: 0.2 Maize 4.3 d: 0.2 zFor 10 rain instances in a field with 3 replications (= 30 readings per value) plus/minus standard errors of the means. 114 Figure 5. Monthly rainfall and mean monthly maximum and minimum temperatures from March to July at Lambo for 1989 and for 53 years (1935-1988). Numbers above each bar represent number of rain days during the indicated month. RAINFALL (MM) 600 :- 500 ~- 400 ~- I 300 . 200 ~- 100 ‘- "30 «25 8 ‘3... LL! ”-20 n: ,...-_ a k”.—O——"'.\\\ < ‘x T‘ “15 Ibl-J \ 17 ‘ 5. 7 IE 2‘ «~10 18 9 -5 lfi§l 8 F8 0 MAR APR 'MAY JUN ‘JUL MONTHS RAINFALL [3 1939 MEAN OF 53 YRS. TEMPERATURE °—-° MEAN MAXIMUM 1989 '- -° MEAN MINIMUM 1989 .—-. MEAN MAXIMUM OF 53 YRS. - -‘ MEAN MINIMUM OF 53 YRS. 115 116 Figure 6. Monthly rainfall and mean monthly maximum and minimum temperatures from March to July at Lyamungu for 1989 and for 53 years (1935-1988). Numbers above each bar represent number of rain days during the indicated month. RAINFALL (MM) 28 800 -- ... 700 +- 2—35 600 «L 2-30 500 ~- \23 2-25 \ 4oo -- N 2—20 A A 22 A 3002- r:: § 9 (~15 .— § \ A A 200 )_ Q S ~10 A A 2 A A 100» \ § - 5 A \ “is 2 A A (A \ . MART APR‘ MAW JUN ‘ JUL ' MONTHS RAINFALL El 1939 MEAN OF 53 YRS. TEMPERATURE -—-- MEAN MAXIMUM 1989 °—-° MEAN MINIMUM 1989 a- -A MEAN MAXIMUM OF 53 YRS. ‘- -‘ MEAN MINIMUM OF 53 YRS. 117 TEMPERATURE (°C) 118 . Egan seed infection The percentage of bean seed infected with Ls. pv. phaseolicola was lower for bean grown in pure stands than when grown in association with maize, but the differences were not statistically significant (2 = 0.05) except for experiment 2 at Lambo (Table 3). In general, experiments at Lambo and at Lyamungu showed similar trends of seed infection. High levels of seed infected with halo blight bacteria in the bean/maize intercrop system were consistent with the high disease severity ratings on pods at both locations. Randomly selected pure cultures of fig. pv. phaseolicola colonies from infected bean seed were all pathogenic when tested on Canadian Wonder bean seedlings. DISCUSSION When considered together, the data from this study suggest that intercropping beans with maize ecologically favors multiplication of fig. pv. phaseolicola in bean leaves. Although there were no significant differences in foliage disease severity between the two cropping systems, the increased inoculum density in the bean/maize intercrop system resulted in more severe disease on pods and in a higher percentage of seed infection than when beans were grown in a pure stand. Results of this study further suggest that disease severity on foliage may not always be adequate to assess the advantage of intercrop systems in reducing disease because high numbers of infected seed may be produced in such systems. The mechanism for increased _P_.s. pv. phaseolicola multiplication in the intercrop system seems to involve increased moisture retention in the canopy as indicated by the fact that maize leaves took longer time to dry after cessation of rain than bean leaves. In addition, bean in association with maize retained moisture longer than bean grown alone. 119 Table 3. Percentage of Canadian Wonder bean seed infected with Pseudomonas sy9'ngae pv. phaseolicola in two bean cropping systems in northern Tanzania. Seed infection (%)Y Location Expgriment Monocro Intercrop Lambo 1 16.8 t 82 a 28.3 :I: 7 a 2 11.8:8a 38.11-5b Lyamungu 1 12.3 1- 2 a 20.6 i 10 a 2 12.4:8a 32.2:9a YValues are means of three replicates : standard errors of the means. 2Within each experiment, means followed by the same letter are not significantly different (2 = 0.05) by Student’s t-test. Data were arcsine transformed before analysis. 120 This effect may be magnified when beans are planted late in the maize crop as is sometimes the case in northern Tanzania and in other areas of the country because of the greater canopy development. Bacterial populations, especially epiphytic populations, have been reported to increase when plants are wet (Leben and Daft, 1967; Mulrean and Schroth, .1982; Smitley and McCarter, 1982). Increased moisture retention in the intercrop system may also result in a lowered temperature in the canopy. Therefore, in areas where high temperature and reduced moisture are limiting factors for halo blight development, such as at Lambo, intercropping bean with maize may increase halo blight severity, especially on pods. This is of practical significance in countries such as Tanzania, where programs to produce pathogen-free seed are lacking. Data from this work also indicate that maize leaves do not support high populations of halo blight bacteria. This reduces the risk of the maize canopy providing additional inoculum for the bean crop when the two are grown in association. Comparison of data obtained from the two sites indicate that Ls. pv. phaseolicola multiplied to higher numbers at Lambo than at Lyamungu (Figs. 1 and 2). It is likely that differences in population dynamics were caused by differences in temperature. Temperatures were about 4 C lower at Lyamungu than at Lambo during the assay period. When combined with canopy effects, temperature differences between the two locations could even be increased beyond 4 C. Differences in the amount of rainfall may also account for differences in population dynamics between the two locations. Although multiplication of phytOpathogenic bacteria on plant surfaces has been reported to increase after rain (Hirano and Upper, 1983), when excessive rainfall, such as was the case at Lyamungu, is combined with low temperature, a net negative effect on population size may occur. We can therefore hypothesize that when initial inoculum is not a limiting factor, 121 temperature and moisture availability in the associated crops become key elements in determining the balance between increasing and reducing disease severity in such cropping systems. However, when initial inoculum comes from outside the cropping system, the maize crop would act as a barrier and therefore, reduce the amount of initial inoculum available for the bean crop (Burdon, 1978; Msuku and Edje, 1982). But this may not be the case for seed-borne pathogens such as halo blight bacteria. The original source of initial inoculum, therefore, is another factor governing the balance between increased and reduced disease severity in intercrop systems. Earlier studies (Msuku and Edje, 1982; van Rheenen, pt 91., 1981; Vermeulen, 1982) have indicated that halo blight is generally less severe when beans are grown in association with maize than in pure stands. Some of these studies, however, have involved only observations in agronomy experiments (Msuku and Edje, 1982; Stoetzer and Waite, 1984; van Rheenen, e_t 91., 1981), depending therefore, on natural infection which does not insure uniform initial inoculum in the two bean cropping systems. Moreover, population dynamics, percentage seed infection and moisture retention difierences have not been considered in previous studies as quantitative factors to measure ecological fitness of the pathogen in such systems. By using these parameters to quantify disease and introducing a uniform amount of initial inoculum in the two bean cropping systems, results of the current study generally do not agree with previous reports, because the environment in the bean/maize intercrop system ecologically favored increased multiplication of halo blight bacteria as well as increased seed infection. Contradictory results of the effect of intercropping beans with maize on disease severity have also been reported for bean anthracnose (CIAT; 1986b; CIAT; 1989; Msuku and Edje, 1982) and on bean rust (Msuku and Edje, 1982). As van Rheenen e_t, 91. (1981) 122 suggested, the environmental differences between monocropping and intercropping, and their influence on disease are far too complex for generalization and are not well understood. In order to understand better the interaction of plant pathogens and crops grown in association, we need to quantify the interacting parts of the systems. This will involve simultaneous measurement of parameters related to the pathogen, which include population size, disease incidence and severity, and weather variables such as moisture and temperature (Hirano and Upper, 1983). LITERATURE CITED Altieri, M.A., C.A. Francis, A. van Schoonhoven and J .D. Doll. 1978. A review of insect prevalence in maize (299 may L.) and bean (ghaseolus vulgaris L.) in polycultural systems. Field Crops Res. 1:33-49. Borlaug, M.P.. 1958. The use of multiline or composite varieties to control airborne epidemic disease of self pollinated crop plants. pp. 12-26. 91: Proceedings of the First International Wheat Genetics Held at the University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. August 11-15. The Public Press Ltd., Winnipeg. 268pp. Browning, LA. 1957. Studies of the effect of yield blends of oat varieties on stem rust losses. Phytopathology 47:4-5 (Abstr.). Browning, IA. and KJ. Frey. 1969. Multiline cultivars as means of disease control. Ann. Rev. Phytopath. 7:355-382. Burdon, J.H. 1978. Mechanisms of plant disease control in heterogeneous plant populations - an ecologists view. pp. 193-200. I_n: Scott, RR. and A. Bambridge (Eds) Plant Disease Epidemiology. Blackwell Scientific Publications. Oxford. 329pp. CIAT 1986a. Bean Production Systems in Africa. CIAT; Cali, Colombia. 16pp. CIAT 1986b. Principles of Intercropping with Beans. CIAT; Cali, Colombia. 40pp. CIAT 1987. Standard Systems for the Evaluation of Bean Germplasm. CIAT; Cali, Colombia. 54pp. CIAT 1989. Annual Report. Bean Program. Working Document No. 68. CIAT; Cali, Colombia. 397pp. Delp, B.R., L.J. Stowell and J .J . Marois. 1986. Evaluation of field sampling techniques for estimation of disease incidence. Phytopathology 76:1299-1305. Hirano, SS. and CD. Upper. 1983. Ecology and epidemiology of foliar bacterial plant pathogens. Ann. Rev. Phytopath. 21:243-269. Katunzi, A.L., J.M. Thri, KP. Sibuga and RN. Misangu. 1987. The efl'ect of intercropping and fertilizer application on bean diseases and yield. pp. 66-73. E: Salema, M.P. and AN. Minjas (Eds). Bean Research. Vol. 2. Papers Presented at a Workshop Held at Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania, October 1-3. Benedictine Publications, Ndanda, Peramiho. 261pp. Kikoka, LP. and J.M. Tbri. 1988. Efl‘ect of cropping systems on bean disease and yield. pp. 40-44. 19: Salema, M.P. and AN. Minjas (Eds). Bean Research. Vol. 3 Papers Presented at a Workshop Held at Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania, September 28-30. Benedictine Publications, Ndanda, Peramiho. 173pp. 123 124 King, E.O., M.K. Ward and DE. Raney. 1954. Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescin. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 44:301-307. Leakey, C.L.A. 1970. Crop Improvement in East Africa. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux. Farnham Royal, England. 280pp. Leben, C. and G. C. Daft. 1967. P0pulation variation of epiphytic bacteria. Can. J. Microbiol. 13:1151-1156. Little, TM. and FJ. Hills. 1978. Agricultural Experimentation: Design and Analysis. John Wiley and Sons. New York. 350pp. Manners, J.G. 1982. Principles of Plant Pathology. Cambridge University Press. London. 264pp. Martin, GB. 1984. Genetic Diversity of Bean Landraces in Northern Malawi. MS. Thesis. Michigan State University, East Lansing. 152pp. Moreno, R. and L. Mora. 1984. Effect of cropping pattern and soil management of plant diseases. 11. Bean rust epidemiology. Turrialba 34:41-45. Msuku, W.A.B. and O.TI Edje. 1982. Effect of mixed cropping of maize and bean on bean diseases. Ann. Rept. Bean Improv. Coop. 25:16-18. Mukiibi, J. 1976. Possible relationship between intercropping and plant disease problems in Uganda. pp. 116-117. I_n: Monyo, J.H., A.D.R. Ker and M.Marilyn (Eds). Intercropping in Semi Arid Areas. Proc. First Symp. Intercrop. Semi Arid Areas Held at Morogoro, Tanzania. May 10-12, 1976. 45pp. Mulrean, EN. and M.N. Schroth. 1982. Ecology of Xanthomonas camgtris pv. juglandis on Persian (English) walnuts. Phytopathology 72:434-438. National Academy of Sciences. 1972. Genetic Vulnerability of Major Crops. National Academy of Science. Washington, DC. 307pp. Norman, D.W. and EFT. Baker. 1975. Cropping systems in northern Nigeria. pp 334-361. I_n: IRRI (Ed). Proc. Cr0pping Systems Workshop. Los Bar'ios, Philippines. March, 1975. O’Brien, RD. and SE. Lindow. 1988. Effect of plant species and environmental conditions on epiphytic population size of Pseudomonas sm'ngae and other bacteria. Phytopathology 79:619-627. Smidt, M. and AK. Vidaver. 1986. Population dynamics of Clavibacter michiganense subsp. nebraskense in field-grown dent corn and pop-corn. Plant Dis. 70:1031-1036. 125 Smitley, DR. and SM. McCarter. 1982. Spread of Pseudomonas m’ngae pv. tomato and role of epiphytic populations and environmental conditions in disease development. Plant Dis. 66:713-717. Steiner, KG. 1984. Intercropping in Tropical Small-holder Agriculture with Special Reference to West Africa. Second Edition. Deutsche Gesellschaft fiir Technische Zusammenarbeit. Eschborn. Germany. 304pp. Stoetzer, H.A.I. and B.H. Waite. 1984. Evaluation of bean diseases in the grain legume project trials, Katumani Research Station. East African Agric. and Forestry Journal 44:333-353 (Special issue). van Rheenen, H.A., O.E. Hasselbach and S.G.S. Muigai. 1981. The effect of growing beans together with maize on the incidence of bean diseases and pests. Neth. J. Plant Path. 7:193-199. Vermeulen, J. 1982. Screening Thn Bean Cultivars (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to Halo Blight Under Six Different Planting systems. MS. Thesis (Plant Breeding). Dutch Agricultural University, Wageningen and CIAT; Cali, Colombia (Abstr.). TATE UNIV. RRRIES LIB IIIIIII IIIIHIIII I 443 300876 17 ICHISRN s IHIIIIIIIII 3129