l/ /MICHIGAN snr I ll I////II///I//////I///I/Il ill/limit ‘ 9195 " fflfc': 'This is to certify that the thesis entitled IN SITU LASER ABLATION DEPOSITION OF YBaZCu307_x THIN FILMS USING A MICROWAVE PLASMA DISK REACTOR OXYGEN SOURCE presented by Conrad Matthew Pawlowski has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for h7‘ S ‘ degree in E6 /£L ~ flab/x Major professor Datej’jZ?/C22/ 0-7639 MS U is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Institution LiBHARY Michigan State L University PLACE iN RETURN BOX to remove this checkout from your record. TO AVOID FINES return on or before date due. DATE DUE DATE DUE DATE DUE JUN 1 8m :9 ‘ MSU is An Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity institution «me“: IN SIT U LASER ABLATION DEPOSITION OF YBazCu3O7,x THIN FILMS USING A MICROWAVE PLASMA DISK REACTOR OXYGEN SOURCE By Conrad Matthew Pawlowski A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Electrical Engineering 1992 aflé / 70/ K 4/") IN SIT U LASER ABLATION DEPOSITION OF YBazCu3O7,x FILMS USING A MICROWAVE PLASMA DISK REACTOR OXYGEN SOURCE Conrad Matthew Pawlowski In situ laser ablation deposition of high-temperature superconductors (HTSC) has been employed to produce device-quality films for possible applications in microsensors, Josephson junctions, VLSI interconnects and vacuum microelectronics. Understanding the effects of lowered substrate temperatures (<650 °C) and lowered oxygen partial pressures (<40 mTorr) is important to improving film quality. Under these conditions, molecular oxygen is insufficient for the necessary formation of the orthorhombic-II superconducting phase (X=6.93) of YBazCu3Ox. This phase has recently been grown at lowered pressures by laser ablation with atomic oxygen. Utilizing electron cyclotron resonance (ECR) magnets, a microwave plasma disk reactor (MPDR) can produce high concentrations of atomic oxygen (>IO”/cm3) at low pressures (<10 mTorr). The goals of this research were to design a laser ablation system, optimize YBCO growth by laser ablation and to use atomic oxygen from an MPDR oxygen source for low-pressure (<10 mTorr) deposition. We successfully deposited YBCO films using the MPDR at low oxygen partial pressures (4 mTorr, 815 °C). Films exhibited zero resistance at temperatures as high as 79 K and the measured critical current was as high as 2.9 x 10’ A/cm2 at 77 K. Copyright by CONRAD MATTHEW PAWLOWSKI 1992 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to acknowledge and thank Dr. M. Aslam of Michigan State University and Dr. L. Rimai of the Ford Motor Company research staff for guidance, support, and communication throughout this project. Support from the Center for Fundamental Materials Research made this project possible. Support was also received from Ford Motor Company which provided equipment to accomplish these studies. At various stages of this project, support in the form of communication was also helpful from D. Kubinski, D. Hoffman, E. M. Logothetis, and R. Soltis. R. Ager generated X-ray diffraction patterns and R. Elder helped with SEM images. Thanks must also be extended to A. Srivastava and J. Asmussen for communication and assistance regarding the operation of the MPDR-610. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ............................................ vii LIST OF FIGURES .......................................... viii Introductuction ........................................... 1 Chapter 1 Basics of Superconductivity 1.1 Low-Temperature Superconductors and Superconducting Phenomena ...... 4 1.1.1 Zero-Resistance State ................................. 4 1.1.2 Meissner Effect ..................................... 4 1.1.3 Josephson Effect .................................... 7 1.1.4 Flux-quantization Effect .............................. 10 1.2 High-Temperature Superconductors ............................ 10 1.2.1 Physical Properties .................................. 11 1.2.2 Crystal Structure ................................... 12 1.3 Theories of Superconductivity ............................... 13 1.3.1 Electrical PrOperties ................................. 13 1.3.2 BCS Theory for Low-Temperature Superconductors ........... 14 1.3.3 RVB Theory and Goddard's Magnon Theory for HTSC ......... 16 Chapter 2 YBCO Thin-Film Deposition 2. 1 Introduction ............................................ l 7 2.2 Laser Ablation, Sputtering and Electron-Beam Evaporation ............ 17 2.3 Theoretical Model Laser Ablation ............................. 19 2.4 Novel YBCO Thin Film Deposition Techniques ................... 24 2.4.1 Novel Laser Ablation Techniques ....................... 24 2.4.2 Activated Oxygen Enriched Film Deposition ................ 25 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.1 4.2 4.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 6.1 6.2 Chapter 3 YBCO Laser Ablation Deposition Parameters Substrates ............................................. 27 Target Conditions ........................................ 29 Laser Types and Conditions ................................. 30 Oxygen Partial Pressure Effects .............................. 32 Chapter 4 Design and Construction of the YBCO Deposition System Introduction ............................................ 34 Design Considerations ..................................... 34 4.2.1 Chamber Design .................................... 34 4.2.2 Microwave Plasma Disk Reactor ........................ 35 4.2.3 Optics ........................................... 39 4.2.4 Target Port ....................................... 39 4.2.5 Vacuum Pump ..................................... 39 4.2.6 Substrate Heater ................................... 40 YBCO Growth Process Design Considerations .................... 42 4.3.1 Target—To-Substrate Distance ........................... 42 4.3.2 Length of Deposition ................................ 43 4.3.3 Cooling Procedure .................................. 43 Chapter 5 Results Introduction ............................................ 46 Experimental Procedure for YBCO Depositions ................... 47 Results of Growth Optimization .............................. 49 5.3.1 Heater Temperature ................................. 49 5.3.2 Target-to-Substrate Distance ............................ 50 5.3.3 MPDR-610 Oxygen Source ............................ 51 Deposition of YBCO Films in Molecular Oxygen .................. 53 Deposition of YBCO Films Using 3 Microwave Cavity .............. 63 Deposition of YBCO Films Using an MPDR ..................... 66 Chapter 6 Summary and Conclusions Conclusions and Suggestions ................................ 78 LIST OF REFERENCES ................................... 80 vi Table 3.1: Table 3.2: Table 5.1: Table 5.2: LIST OF TABLES Lattice mismatch for c-axis oriented YBCO on various substrates (after Norton, reference 34). .................... 27 Reflection and absorption coefficients for various lasers on YBCO (afier Wu, reference 49). ......................... 3O YBCO films with Tc(R=0) between 73 and 90 K. Films were deposited using molecular oxygen. ....................... 54 Comparison of films deposited in molecular oxygen and films deposited in activated oxygen from a tunable-stub microwave cavity. .......................................... 68 vii Figure 1.1: Figure 1.2: Figure 1.3: Figure 1.4: Figure 1.5: Figure 1.6: Figure 1.7: Figure 2.1: Figure 2.2: Figure 4.1: Figure 4.2: LIST OF FIGURES Meissner effect in bulk superconducting material. (after Kittel, Reference 6) ............................. 5 Magnetization vs. applied magnetic field for (a) Type I and (b) Type II superconductors. (afier Kittel, Reference 6) ......... 6 (a) An SIS Josephson junction tunnelling device and (b) the corresponding I-V characteristics at T=0. (after Decroux, Reference 14) ..................................... 7 Flux Quantization Effect (after Decroux, Reference 14) . . . ...... 9 Time-line showing the increase in critical temperature, TC(R=O). (after Robins, Reference 15) ........................... 11 Diagram of (a) the perovskite unit cell (b) the overall structure of YBCO and (c) the Cu-O conducting planes sandwiching a single Y- plane. (after Sleight, Reference 1) ........................ 12 Energy band diagram above and below the superconducting transition. (after Decroux, Reference 14) ................... 15 Schematic diagram of a laser ablation deposition system. ........ 18 Schematic diagram of the laser/plasma/target interaction: (A) unaffected target(B) evaporated target matter.(C)dense plasma absorbing laser radiation (D)expanding plasma transparent to the laser beam.(after Singh, Reference 23) ................ 24 Schematic of the laser ablation system incorporating the MPDR-610 oxygen source. ..................................... 36 (a) Photograph of the final laser ablation chamber design, incorporating the MPDR and (b) a schematic of the MPDR-610 ion/free radical source. ............................... 37 viii Figure 4.3 Figure 4.4 Figure 5.1: Figure 5.2: Figure 5.3: Figure 5.4: Figure 5.5: Figure 5.6: Figure 5.7: Figure 5.8: Figure 5.9: Figure 5.10: Figure 5.11: Figure 5.12: Figure 5.13: The influence of substrate temperature on TC(R=O) for SrTiO,, Mgo, and Si + ZrOz. (After Blank, Reference 66) ................. 41 Oxygen partial pressure vs. temperature plot showing critical stability limits for three phases of YBCO. (after Hammond, Reference 78) ......................... 44 Ratio of maximum forward power to reflected power of the MPDR-610 vs. oxygen partial pressure. The substrate heater is placed at various distances from the MPDR. The input power is 200 Watts of 2.45 GHz microwave radiation ............... 52 Resistance vs. Temperature for YBCO on (100) YSZ. The substrate temperature was 780 °C. .................... 55 Diagram of the patterned YBCO microbridge. The I, V designations represent the 4-point probe contacts .............. 56 Critical Current 0,) vs. Temperature for YBCO film sample #CLA-Z 58 Profilometer measurement of a 40 um wide YBCO bridge. ...... 59 Plume Geometry in the laser ablation deposition system. ........ 60 Relative stoichiometry vs. position for YBCO film deposited in molecular oxygen. .................................. 61 X-ray diffraction pattern of YBCO film on (100) YSZ. ......... 62 Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) images of the surface of a YBCO film on YSZ. ............................... 64 Resistance vs. Temperature of YBCO film on (100) YSZ deposited using a microwave cavity oxygen source. ........... 65 Critical Current (1,) vs. Temperature for YBCO sample #LLA-73. The IC value at 77 K is 1.1 x 10‘5 A/cmz. ........... 67 Normalized resistance vs. T (K) for two samples prepared in (a) 02 at 75 mTorr, Tc(0)=76K and (b) 75 mTorr activated oxygen, Tc(0)==8lK. ................................. 69 Resistance vs. temperature for YBCO on YSZ. The film was grown using the MPDR-610 oxygen source at 180 watts, 4mTorr, and Twm = 815°C. ................................. 70 ix Figure 5.14: Figure 5.15 Figure 5.16 Figure 5.17: Critical current density (I,) vs. temperature for sample #CLA—131 prepared using the MPDR-610. The IC value at 77 K is 2.9 x 105 A/cm2 .................................. 72 X-ray diffraction pattern showing c-axis orientation of YBCO on (100) YSZ. The sample number is CLA-l31, prepared using the MPDR-610 at 4 mTorr. ............................ 73 Scanning electron micrographs of film #CLA-131 at (a) 2 pm and (b) 1 um resolutions. .............................. 74 Resistance vs. Temperature curve for YBCO on YSZ deposited at 10 mTorr 02. The film exhibits semiconductive behavior. ..... 75 Introduction Since the discovery of the ceramic high-temperature superconductors (HTSC) in 1986, scientists and researchers have been striving to integrate HTSC materials with microelectronics. Before HTSC's, the study of superconducting materials took place at liquid helium temperatures (4.2 K) which is an expensive refrigerant. The discovery of YBaQCu307, BiSrCaCuO, and other HTSC ceramics have opened the door for the development of inexpensive, nitrogen-based refrigeration and possibly on chip refrigerators. Possible microelectronic applications exist in the form of sensitive magnetic field detectors or gradiometers, infrared detectors or bolometers, high-speed devices such as Josephson junctions, active and passive microwave devices, and superconducting interconnects for VLSI applications. Before these applications can be realized, several superconductor/semiconductor thin-film fabrication issues must be addressed. These issues include finding compatible substrates, etchants, photoresist materials, and passivation materials. Also important to HTSC microelectronic integration is improving overall film quality through the development and optimization of the thin film deposition techniques. Present YBCO deposition techniques include laser ablation, electron beam evaporation, sputtering, and metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD). Each deposition process has its own advantages and disadvantages which make it suitable for the particular HTSC thin film application. The laser ablation technique was used for our experiments and its advantages, disadvantages, theory, and details of the deposition conditions will be discussed. 2 The most promising HTSC ceramic for microelectronic application is YBaZCu3O7 or "123". It is a metastable compound which is often referred to as a solid solution since it can exist over a broad range of compositions [1]; therefore, we use the term "phase" instead of "compound," as in "123-phase." Most of the copper oxide superconductors are metastable, but 123 has emerged as the dominant material in thin-film research for a couple of reasons: (1) YBCO has been the easiest material to obtain single-phase films and (2) it has the highest measured critical current densities, J, [2]. Using current thin- film deposition techniques, most other HTSC ceramics form more than one stable phase. Some of these phases may be non-superconducting or superconducting at lower temperatures. This leads to poor overall film qualities such as reduced critical temperature, T,, or semiconducting behavior. Conversely, single-phase YBCO films have been quite easy to fabricate. High I, , which is important for device applications has been measured to be more than 5 x 10‘ Mom2 at 77 K for some YBCO thin films[3]. Other HTSC ceramics have J, values 1-3 orders of magnitude 1ess[4,5]. Conventional laser ablation processing conditions are 150-200 mTorr O2 partial pressure and the substrate temperature >650°C. Understanding the effects of lowered (<650°C) substrate temperatures and lowered oxygen partial pressures (<40 mTorr) is important for improving YBCO film quality. Under the conditions of lowered substrate temperatures and lowered oxygen partial pressures, molecular oxygen is insufficient for the necessary formation of the Orthorhombic-II superconducting phase (X=6.93) of YBaZCu3Ox. This phase has recently been grown at lowered pressures by laser ablation with atomic oxygen. Utilizing electron cyclotron resonance (ECR) magnets, a microwave plasma disk reactor (MPDR) can produce high concentrations of atomic oxygen 3 (>10“/cm3) at low pressures (<10 mTorr). The goals of this research were directed toward designing a laser ablation system, optimizing YBCO laser-ablation growth conditions at various molecular oxygen pressures and optimizing low-pressure (<10 mTorr) growth using atomic oxygen from an MPDR source. We successfully deposited YBCO films using the MPDR at low oxygen partial pressures (4 mTorr, 750 °C) and films exhibited zero resistance at temperatures as high as 79 K and the measured critical current was as high as 2.9 x 105 A/cm2 at 77 K. Chapter 1 Basics of Superconductivity 1.1 Low-Temperature Superconductors and Superconducting Phenomena 1 .1. 1 Zero-Resistance State The phenomenon of a material exhibiting zero electrical resistivity at a finite but sufficiently low temperature has intrigued scientists since the observation of superconductivity in mercury at 4.15 K by Kamerlingh Onnes in 1911. When a material achieves the superconducting state, the transfonnation is said to occur at the critical temperature, T,, At or below T,, a loop of superconducting material can carry the same electrical current for extremely long lengths of time[6]. Essentially, the material becomes a 'perfect' conductor. The decay of supercurrents is so slow, that File et a1. predicted they would last up to 100,000 years in a solenoid of Nb_,,Zr_25 [7]. The electrical properties are also characterized by a critical current, 1,. This value is the amount of current per unit area which can be passed through the superconductor before it goes into its normal state. 1.1.2 Meissner Effect Aside from their electrical properties, superconducting materials also have unique magnetic properties. Cooling a superconductor below its T,, any magnetic flux present before the transition is expelled from sample. This characterization of the superconducting state is called the Meissner effect and is illustrated in figure 1.1. As can be seen, the bulk superconducting material has zero magnetic induction in its interior, which is equivalent to a magnetic susceptibility, x, equal to -1 in the complete 4 superconducting state. In the presence of higher magnetic fields, the diamagnetic property (or Meissner effect) breaks down at a certain critical magnetic field, H,. Type-I and Type-II // s.-. W/ \V» liwiia \ a \\\ W/ T 4 g I 24/e o / (I) , ’ VOLTAGE (b) Figure 1.3: (a) An SIS Josephson junction tunnelling device and (b) the corresponding I-V characteristics at T=0. (after Decroux, Reference 14) 8 in figure 1.3(a). When the device is cooled below T, and no voltage is applied across the junction, Cooper pairs can tunnel across the insulating barrier, resulting in a junction current with no applied voltage. This effect is possible since Cooper pairs (the main mechanism for superconductivity in BCS theory) can travel a distance C without breaking the pair [8]. The tunneling probability for Cooper pairs is given by P(x) ~ e‘zx" where x is the tunneling distance and d is the thickness of the insulating barrier [9,10,] l]. Longer coherence lengths are important for high Cooper pair tunneling. However, the Cooper pair tunneling current is limited to the critical current of the junction, J,,. The junction critical current, J,,, is a smaller quantity than the critical current of the superconducting material, 1,. A generalized expression for this current is given as = nA (T) A (T) JCO 2e19,, can“ 21cc) where A is the bandgap of the superconducting material and RI, is the normal state resistance of the junction[ 12]. If we consider figure 1.3 (a), where the superconducting Cooper—pair wave functions of the materials on either side of the barrier, ‘i’, and ‘P2, are given by v1=ltr1 19“” v, = is, is“: where q», and (1’2 are the Josephson phase differences and AP, F and H’ZF are the densities of the C00per pairs on each electrode[13]. These densities can be assumed to be constant for not too large currents. The junction current can now be represented by J,=J,sin(0, the junction current is given by J,=i’£§ ivP (aw-23A) m ' C where m' is the effective mass of the electron, h is Plank's constant, and A is the area of the junction. If the magnitude of the applied voltage, N l, is greater than ZA/e (where 2A is the minimum energy to break a pair), quasi-particle tunneling dominates. This effect is shown by the hysteric I—V characteristics of figure 1.3(b). The junction now behaves similar to a normal-state tunnel-junction. These I-V characteristics make Josephson junctions usefirl for high-speed switching devices. B-noo Figure 1.4: Flux Quantization Effect (after Decroux, reference 14) 10 l. 1 .4 F lux-Quantization Effect The effect of flux quantization is useful in superconducting loop structures such as SQUIDs (Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices). By the flux-quantization effect, the magnetic flux, B, within a loop of superconducting material is forced to be a multiple of the flux quantum, 6D,. All the Cooper pairs in the ring of superconductor have the same superconducting wavefunction and are related to another point on the loop by phase. The flux-quantization effect is illustrated in figure 1.4, where the magnetic flux lines are shown to be trapped in the hole of the superconducting loop. Magnetometers made from SQUIDs have sensitivities several orders of magnitude higher than other commercial magnetic sensing devices [14]. 1.2 High-Temperature Superconductors Most of the research in the years after Onnes' discovery (1911 - 1964) was on the Niobium based alloys. The highest T, was 23 K, still well below the limit of conventional cryogenic technology, 77 K. Cryotechnology above 77 K is relatively inexpensive since it can be based on nitrogen gas. Oxide superconductors were discovered in 1964, but the major breakthrough did not come until 1986 with the discovery of the (La2_,,Ba,,)CuO4 or 2-1-4 ceramic superconductors which exhibited superconducting behavior at 35 K [1]. Then in 1987, Paul Chu of the University of Houston discovered the milestone superconductor, YBCO, with a T, of 94 K. This was extremely significant since it is the first material to break the 77 K barrier [15,16]. Other oxide superconductors were then developed with T,'s as high as 125 K as seen in the timeline of figure 1.5. YBaQCu307 (abbreviated: 1-2-3) is presently the most widely studied high- ll 160 . 140 - g TlBoCoCuO 32, 120 - D BiSrCaCuO E 100 _ YBCO LLJ % 80 I —77 K, Liquid Nitrogen —— P: 2" 60 _ LaSrCuO g E 40 -« Q N 20 _ NbN Nbssri Nb-Al-Ge $991.1 ”300W Hg Pb Nb ,__1—““ .4 - o r , I r 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 TIME (Years) Figure 1.5: Time-line showing the increase in critical temperature, T,(R=0).(after Robins, Reference 15) temperature superconductor (HTSC) for device applications. This is true because thin films of YBCO are easy to fabricate than other HTSC materials and have properties more promising for microelectronic device applications. The complex cuprate superconductors shown in figure 1.5 exhibit superconductivity at temperatures up to 125 K, but are much more difficult to fabricate because of the existence of multiple stable phases. 1.2.1 Physical Properties YBCO films have the highest critical currents, J,, to date up to 5 x 10‘ A/cm2 at 77 K[17]. Most of the research is directed toward YBCO films instead of bulk material because reported J, values for bulk YBCO are only 40 - 3000 A/cm2 at 77 K[S]. Upper 12 critical field values of YBCO films at 77 K range from 20 to 40 Tesla, which make them good for practical device applications. 123 has a coherence length of approximately 7 A perpendicular and 34 A parallel to the c-axis direction[16]. Because of the short coherence length as compared to low-temperature superconductors, grain boundaries and other lattice defects can act as weak links (Josephson junction with a larger barrier), reducing J, values. Effort is underway to fabricate a-axis oriented films for better Josephson junctions since the coherence length is longer parallel to the c-axis. 1.2.2 Crystal Structure The YBCO structure can be described as a triple unit perovskite cell with yttrium and barium ions in alternating layers and copper atoms on the intervening planes. A diagram of the general perovskite unit cell is shown in figure 1.6(a) and the YBazCu3O7 structure is shown in figure 1.6(b). This overall structure shown in figure 1.6 (b) is the orthorhombic-II superconducting phase (T,(R==0)==94 K) with lattice parameters of a=3.82 A, b==3.89 A, and c=l 1.68 A[13]. 123 also exists in a tetragonal, non-superconducting Figure 1.6: Diagram of (a) the perovskite unit cell (b) the overall structure of YBCO (c)the Cu-O conducting planes sandwiching a single Y-plane.(after Sleight,reference 1) 13 phase and an 'oxygen-deficient' orthorhombic-l phase which has a lowered T, of approximately 50 - 60 K[17]. The tetragonal structure is also referred to as 'oxygen deficient' and behaves as a semiconductor. Fabrication of films or bulk YBaZCu3O7 usually involves going through two phase transformations. The tetragonal phase, YBazCu3O7,X (X = 6.0 - 6.2), is the most stable phase. During cool down, the 123 sample is cooled slowly in oxygen to bring the oxygen content up to 7. The cooling times vary from one hour to several hours, and the resulting YBCO orthorhombic-II phase has a T, above 90 K. If the highly-stable tetragonal phase is formed and then cooled rapidly in oxygen, insufficient oxygen incorporation may result in formation of the orthorhombic-1 phase (X=6.2 to 6.5) which may have broad zero- resistance transitions, reduced T,'s, or non-superconducting properties. 1.3 Theories of Superconductivity 1.3.1 Electrical Properties The structure of YBa2Cu3O7 shown in figure 1.6(b) illustrates the two Cu—O planes which sandwich the yttrium plane. Conduction is believed to occur due to the motion of holes in the Cu-O sheets. Although there is some superconducting wave firnction (w) overlap in the c-axis direction, most conduction takes place in the a-b plane. It is believed that conduction occurs in the a-b plane for two reasons: (1) the oxygen atoms in the c-plane are too far apart or completely absent in the c-direction (Y-layer) and (2) the oxygen atoms in the c-axis direction are further away than the oxygen atoms in the a-b axis layers. This simplifies to a quasi-two-dimensional conduction model. The density of carriers (holes are believed to be the dominant caniers) in YBCO is approximately 102‘lcm3 which is low compared to conventional superconductors [l6]. l4 Substitution of yttrium with other elements in the YBCO lattice changes the superconducting properties by changing the lattice spacing between the Cu-O sheets. The properties of the material can change from varying superconducting properties to semiconducting properties. This substitution method is analogous to modulation doping in semiconductor superlattices. 1.3.2 BCS Theory for Low-Temperature Superconductors Early theories of superconductivity were posed by Gorter and Casimir (1934), London (1935), Ginsburg and Landau (1950), Frohlich (1950), and Pippard (1953). The major theory was posed in 1957 by Bardeen, Cooper, and Schrieffer which is known as the BCS theory of superconductivity. Previous models were unable to integrate the presence of an energy gap and the similar ground state of all superconducting electrons, the electron lattice interaction, large scale coherence, and the 'boson' theory of electron interaction. The electron-lattice interaction posed by BCS theory takes place as follows [6,8,13]: At T < T,, an electron with 8 z8, moves through the lattice and comes within 10" cm of an ion. The electron cloud of the ion is repelled by the electron and the ion is slightly polarized. The ion is then weakly attracted to the electron and the ion deforms the lattice. This slight deformation of the lattice is equivalent to the absorption of a phonon. These phonons are then emitted by the ions. We now let 1., and Mv) be the wave vectors of an electron interacting with the ion and of the emitted phonon respectively. A second electron with wave vector 11,, (with spin and momentum opposite of the first electron) comes along and repels other electrons while emitting a phonon with wave vector — 1(v). The magnitude of the phonon wave 15 vectors are equal but are in opposite directions. The emissions of phonons reduces the nominal energies of each electron to a value of 8 - 8f - 8J2, where *3, is the bonding energy of the Cooper pair. Essentially, the second electron adjusts itself to a lower energy to take advantage of the lattice deformation. The net result is a lower repulsion between the two electrons and the formation of paired states or Cooper pairs. This effect is illustrated in the energy band diagram of figure 1.7. In the figure, the value 2A is the energy gap and A = 8,. The electrons which interact with the filled electron shells of the ions are called quasi-particles and are shown in the conduction and valence bands of the energy band diagram. In this model, more than one electron can occupy the same energy state. Hence, the Cooper pairs are known as 'bosons' since their energies follow Bose-Einstein statistics. 2A 2 i i, OO COOPER PAIRS o . QUASIPARTICLES Figure 1.7: Energy band diagram above and below the superconducting transition.(afier Decroux, Reference 14) 16 All the electrons forming bosons have the same energy and momentum and can be represented by a single wave function, ‘1’ = pmele, where p is the charge density and O is the phase common to all electrons in the superconducting state. Another accomplishment of the BCS theory of superconductor electron-lattice interactions was that it helped to explain the isotope effect. It was found that H, and T, 0: 1/M “2, where M is the mass of the isotopes. The BCS theory was also used to predict T, in low-temperature superconductors: T, = 1.14(OD)exp[-1/(U o D(sf))] where OD is the Debye temperature, U is the electron-lattice interaction, and D(ef) is the density of states at the Fermi level. 1.3.2 RVB Theory and Goddard's Magnon Theory for HTSC The BCS theory did not hold up when attempting to predict the behavior of ceramic HTSC. It could not relate measured band-gap values to critical temperatures in HTSC. The 'Resonant Valence Bond' theory proposed by Philip Anderson attempts to explain ceramic superconductivity. He suggested that a resonating structure exists involving a 'superexchange' of electrons between copper ions. The idea of hole carriers was also proposed as channel by which the resonant exchange takes place. Another theory for ceramic superconductivity is proposed by William Goddard. It results in large scale ordering, based on 'Magnon-pairing'. The ordering is suggested to be a result of the interaction of electron pairs with pairs of copper ions, causing an alignment of their magnetic moments about the oxygen atoms. Chapter 2 YBCO Thin-Film Deposition 2. 1 Introduction A major portion of HTSC research has been directed toward their integration into microelectronics. To realize this integration, reproducible methods for fabricating HTSC thin films have to be developed. Furthermore, the film quality (crystal orientation, smoothness, J,, T,, etc.) should suit the particular application. For example, c-axis oriented films are desired for passive microwave striplines and filters where low-loss conduction is desired in the plane parallel to the substrate[l8]. C-axis oriented films are also useful for planar magnetometer applications because the magnetic penetration depth is shorter in the a-b plane[l9]. The a-b axis oriented films have possible applications in monolithic vertical Josephson junctions where longer coherence lengths are necessary. Each thin-film deposition process can produce films which have physical properties which are better or worse for the particular device application. Laser ablation (the process used in this research) is one of the three main YBCO thin-film deposition techniques. The other two main techniques are sputtering and electron beam co—evaporation. Descriptions, advantages and disadvantages of each deposition technique will be discussed, but most emphasis will be given to laser ablation. 2.2 Laser Ablation, Sputtering and Electron-Beam Evaporation Laser ablation has been established as a versatile, single-source, deposition technique, allowing one-step fabrication of thin-films and multilayered structures without breaking vacuum. This technique is not only promising for YBCO but also for thin-film l7 18 processing of other materials. Semiconductors, insulators and HTSC materials have been deposited onto various substrates using laser ablation. These materials include SiC, Si, Zr02, MgO, SrTiO3, YBCO and other HTSC materials. Laser ablation involves firing nano-second pulses from an excimer laser onto a stoichiometric target. A "plume" or plasma forms and deposits material normally onto the facing, heated substrate (see figure 2.1). Stoichiometry is preserved because the deposition of the target elements is not determined by vapor pressure of the emitted species, but instead by the speed with which the elements leave the target. In the case of YBCO deposition, film growth occurs atomic-layer by atomic-layer from the arriving metal oxides (YO, CuO, BaO)[2]. With the indiffusion of oxygen during YBCO cooling, the laser ablation technique can be an in situ process in which the original target stoichiometry is preserved. In addition to in situ processing, another advantage to laser ablation is the high 02 Laser :19 [I :3!) \ ; a Rotating Substrate YBaCuO target and heater Vacuum Plume port Figure 2.1: Schematic diagram of a laser ablation deposition system. l9 deposition rate as compared to other thin film processes. The laser ablation deposition rate for YBCO has been recorded to be as high as 145 A/sec[20]. This rate is orders of magnitude higher than sputtering (1-10 A/sec) and electron beam co-evaporation (1-5 A/sec). Disadvantages to this technique include the presence of micron-size surface particles and the high cost and inefficiency of a laser as an evaporating source. The single and multi-target sputtering techniques involve accelerating ions through a potential drop. Molecules and species are liberated from the target surface using a sputtering gun (100-150 V DC) or even an ECR beam[2l] in an argon/oxygen ambient. Typical pressures are 400 mTorr argon and 200 mTorr oxygen. Advantages to this method include reproducibility and J, values as high as 5 x 10‘ A/cm2[5]. The main disadvantage is the low deposition rate (1-10 A/sec). Electron beam co-evaporation is also a widely used technique for deposition of YBCO thin films. This method uses three metal vapor sources which are evaporated by electron guns. Stoichiometry and evaporation rates are carefully controlled using crystal monitors or other spectroscopic techniques. An oxygen ambient of approximately 10'3 to 10" Torr is introduced via a tube near the substrate. One advantage to this method is the ability to control stoichiometry. Disadvantages include compositional and rate changes in the metal vapor sources with exposure to high oxygen pressures (>1mTorr), reduced lifetime of the e-beam filaments with exposure to oxygen, low deposition rate (1-5 A/sec), and line-of-sight deposition leading to film non-unifonnity over larger areas[22]. 2.3 Theoretical Model of Laser Ablation Characterizing the laser ablation process has been a complicated undertaking with researchers using theoretical models and computer simulations. By studying the physical 20 deposition parameters of the laser ablation process, Singh and Narayan have developed a simplified physical model [23]. Their model simulates the laser/plasma/solid interaction and is summarized in the following paragraphs. Singh and Narayan break the ablation process down into three regimes: (i) interaction of the laser beam with the bulk target resulting in evaporation of the surface layers, (ii) interaction of the evaporated material with the incident laser beam, and (iii) anisotropic adiabatic expansion of the plasma. The last regime leads to the nature of the deposition process. In the first regime, the high-powered, nanosecond laser pulse (up to 800 mJ/pulse, .5 - 10 J/cmz, 8 - 20 ns pulse duration) is fired at the target. The result is the melting or evaporation of the target surface layers. Using heat balance, the amount of evaporated material per pulse is calculated as Ax, = (1 - R)(E - E,,,)/(AH + CAT) (eqn. 1) where Ax, R, AH, C,, and AT are the evaporated thickness, the reflection coefficient of the laser on YBCO, volume latent heat, volume heat capacity, and the maximum temperature rise respectively. E,,, represents the energy threshold or the minimum energy where appreciable evaporation is observed. For excimer laser irradiation, E,,, z .05 - .4 J/crn2 for YBCO targets and 3.5 - 4.0 J/cm2 for silicon. Equation (1) is valid for conditions where the thermal diffusion distance (2Dr)"2 is larger than the absorption length of the laser beam in the target material, 1/a,. In this equation, D is the thermal diffusivity, and t is the pulse duration. The second regime is the interaction of the evaporated material with the incident laser beam resulting in an isothermal plasma formation and expansion. They derive the initial expansion of the three orthogonal plasma edges formed during this regime. The 21 material evaporated from the target is heated further by the absorption of laser radiation. Neutral species, electrons and some positive ions are present in the initial evaporated ionized-vapor. The primary absorption mechanism for a plasma is the electron-ion collisions. Singh and Narayan represent the absorption by an inverse bremsstrahlung process, involving a free electron absorbing a photon. The absorption coefficient, (1,, of the plasma is expressed as a, = 3.69 x 10’ (Z3n,2 / TV’v’) [1 - exp(-hv/kT)] (eqn. 2) where Z, n,, and T, are the average charge, ion density, and temperature of the plasma, respectively. The terms h, k, and v are the Planck constant, the Boltzman constant, and the frequency of the laser light. This equation assumes that the plasma frequency is smaller than the frequency of the laser light. For an excimer laser with a wavelength of 308 nm, the laser frequency is 9.74 x 10”sec“. For the same plasma frequency, (up, the corresponding electron density is 1.2 x lOzz/cm3. Since this value of electron density is high, and it can be assumed that reflection losses by the plasma are insignificant for excirner-laser-generated plasmas. The [1 - exp(-hv/kT)] term represents the losses due to stimulated emission. The absolute value of the plasma absorption coefficient is quite difficult to compute since it depends on so many parameters. The plasma absorption decreases further away from the target, at the leading edge of plasma. The high expansion velocities (10S - 106 cm/sec) decrease the ion and electron densities, making it transparent to the laser beam in this region. Figure 2.2 diagrams the laser/plasma/target interaction and shows a thin region near the target which constantly absorbs laser radiation. The plasma which absorbs the laser radiation is simulated as a high-temperature, high-pressure gas, initially confined to small dimensions and then 22 allowed to expand in vacuum. The authors then give the density of the plasma at any point (n(x,y,z)) and at time t as NTt x2 I y2 22 .3 21/219”er Y(t)ztc) €pr Meg” ) . . .t = " " ' HIXYZ ) 2X(t:)2 21/(c)2 22m2 for t.<_r, where NT is the total number of evaporated particles at the end of the laser pulse (t=r). X(t), Y(t), and Z(t) represent the orthogonal directions of the expanding plasma and correspond to the distance at which the plasma density decreases to 60.65% of the maximum density. The authors assume that the plasma behaves as an ideal gas; thus, the pressure is related to the density by the equation (P = nkTo) and can be expressed as NTckT, 21/2n3/2rxt c) r( c) zt 1:) X2 .- yz _ 22 .4 2X(t)2 arm2 22(c12Heqn ) P(x,y,z, t) = expl- for 151:, where T0 is the isothermal temperature of the plasma. Based on a previous argument for gaussian density profiles[24], the velocity of the plume species should be proportional to the distance from the target. This can be represented by x (”“31+ 1 (”(9) z dz(t)k(eqn.5) W"""""'c)=.r(t) dc Y(t) dc 1+2”) dc where dX/dt, dY/dt, and dZ/dt refer to the expansion velocities of the plasma edges X, Y, 2, respectively. The continuity equation governs the expansion of the plasma and can be expressed as a mNTt --§Ejvpdv=isp (“r-m dA-a—t t (eqn. 6) where V denotes the volume, and the surface enclosing V is denoted by S. The differential area element is denoted by dA, and N is the unit normal vector. In equation 6, p corresponds to the density of the fluid and m to the mass of the atomic species. The 23 last term of equation 6 shows the injection of atomic species into the plasma. The equation of motion can be expressed as: 6‘7 —_§£ "‘. “ "‘ “‘. :— '_ = [V[p-6E+vdt+p(vV)v+v(vVP)+p(Vv)v+VPldV O(eqn.7) Substituting the equations 3, 4, and 5 into equations 6 and 7, the authors anive at a solution given by _1___d__Z d2=1r, where y is the ratio of specific heat capacities at constant pressure and volume. The terms X,, Y,, and Z, are the initial orthogonal edges of the plasma at the end of the laser pulse (t—=t). This equation is in good agreement with the actual, elliptical shape of the expanded plume. Our experiments indicate that the position of the expanded-plasma- edges relative to the substrate is directly related to film stoichiometry. 24 ll ll ll BULK TARGET PLASMA CLOUD Figure 2.2: Schematic diagram of the laser/plasma/target interaction:(A) unaffected target(B) evaporated target matter.(C)dense plasma absorbing laser radiation (D)expanding plasma transparent to the laser beam.(afier Singh, reference 23) 2.4 Novel YBCO Thin Film deposition Techniques 2.4.1 Novel Laser Ablation Techniques Several modifications to the laser ablation technique have been employed to achieve successful YBCO growth at lowered temperatures (<650 °C). A high-voltage accelerating ring has been used in conjunction with laser ablation to sustain the laser- induced plasma near the substrate[25]. This method has yielded films with T,(R=0) as high as 85 K at a substrate temperature of 400 °C. Substrate biasing has also been employed to lower the substrate temperature. Atomic species are attracted to the biased substrate and increase the amount of oxides necessary for YBCO growth. Films showed improvements in T, (with 1300, i500 V applied to the substrate) over the temperature range of 630 to 67‘ °C. Another technique uses a pulsed oxygen source to deposit films 25 in a low background pressure with (10“ - 10'3 Torr) a high oxygen pressure near the substrate[27]. 2.4.2 Activated Oxygen Enriched Film Deposition Kwo et a1. [28] have reported remarkable increases in T,(0) using molecular beam epitaxy, a differential pumping scheme and activated oxygen produced by a microwave cavity (2.45 GHz excitation frequency). The oxygen partial pressure near the substrate was in the mid 10" Torr range. Activated oxygen enhanced films on (100) MgO exhibited R=0 transitions at temperatures as high as 89 K. Greer conducted an investigation on reduced-oxygen partial pressure laser-ablation depositions [29]. He used laser ablation with a microwave cavity (non-ECR, 500 watts input power) to deposit YBCO films on (100) SrTiO3 and (100) sapphire at .5 mTorr using a quartz flow tube. Measurement of the atomic oxygen flux near the substrate was 5 x 10“ atoms/cmZ-sec at .5 mTorr. T, values were as high as 65 K on SrTiO3, and Greer notes that attempts to increase the atomic oxygen flux at the substrate were deleterious to the electrical properties of the films. Post annealing also failed to affect film quality. This result is supported by work on e-beam co-evaporation deposition of YBCO with ozone/oxygen mixtures. It was found that beyond a 2% mixture of ozone in molecular oxygen, no improvement in electrical properties was found [22]. Yamamoto et al. [30] have used the Wavemat MPDR-610 for post-deposition oxidation of 90° off-axis sputtered YBCO films. Their results showed a decrease in resistance by more than one order of magnitude (4000 ohms to 200 ohms at room temperature) in the presence of the ECR plasma, and no information on T,(R=0) values are given. Using-gtomic oxygen in conjunction with e-beam evaporation, Hurnphries et 26 a1. [31] have observed the formation of the orthorhombic phase of YBCO below the pressure-stability limit of YBCO in 02- Recently, O'Keefe et al. have devised their own ECR ion/free radical source and have used it in conjunction with the laser ablation process [32]. Measurements indicate ion densities are above 10‘°/cm3 [33] when the magnets were in place. Films produced using the ion source without the ECR magnets in place (Oz+ + 0' present) produced films exhibiting zero resistance as high as 56 K. The deposition conditions were: 193 nm laser, substrate and ECR source 5 cm from target, 10 mTorr oxygen partial pressure and a substrate temperature of 640°C. With the ECR magnets in place (high 0' concentration), T,(R=0) values are as high as 69 K under the same deposition conditions. At 690°C and 10 mTorr, T,(R=0) values are as high as 78 K for the ECR and non-ECR depositions, which seems to indicate no improvement using an ECR plasma at this temperature and pressure. One of our goals is also to use ECR oxygen plasma from an MPDR to deposit YBCO films at low-pressures (<10 mTorr). Chapter 3 YBCO Laser Ablation Deposition Parameters 3. l Substrates Choice of an appropriate substrate material is important for the growth of quality, c- or a-axis oriented YBCO films. Lattice matching, orientation, interfacial reactions, Table 3.1: Lattice mismatch for c-axis oriented YBCO on various substrates (after Norton, Reference 34). Material Lattice parameter f=lattice mismatch (nm) MgO ' .421 9.7% SrTiO3 .391 2.3% LaAlO3 .378 -l.l% YSZ[100] // YBCO[100] .516 <0.2% YSZ[110] // YBCO[100] 5.9% cost, and deposition technique must all be considered. The most commonly used substrates for YBCO thin film deposition are MgO, LaAlO3, SrTiO3, A1203, yttria- stabilized zirconia (Y 82) and several semiconductors with buffer layers of YSZ or SrTiO3. Table 3.1 illustrates the lattice mismatch for c-axis oriented YBCO films on various substrates[34]. In the third column, f = (a,-a,)/.5(a,+a,) where a, and a, are the lattice constants of the substrate and of the YBCO overgrowth respectively. Because the strain energy depends on the square of the lattice mismatch, epitaxial growth occurs in orientations that minimize the lattice mismatch and in orientations of the 27 28 minimum energy configuration[35]. The large lattice mismatch of MgO leads to misorientation of grains in the a-b plane. The YBCO lattice matches well with LaAlO3 and SrTiO3, but both are quite expensive and SrTiO3 has a poor dielectric loss tangent, making it unsuitable for microwave applications [5]. Sapphire is more suitable for microwave applications, but reacts with film and has a larger lattice-mismatch[36,37]. Substrate reactions are also a problem with the semiconductor substrates silicon and GaAs [38,39]. For these substrates, researchers have turned to depositing buffer layers such as YSZ, MgO or BaTiO3 [5,40]. In our earlier work, rapid thermal processing was also employed to suppress the substrate reactions [41]. Deposition techniques such as in situ laser ablation and sputtering allow a variety of compatible substrates, but when using other techniques such as MBE, reactions with MgO and YSZ can arise. For example, barium zirconiate has been found to form and consequently degrade films, while Mg substitutes for Cu in the YBCO lattice and reduces T, [42]. We utilized the laser ablation technique, and YSZ was chosen as the predominantly used substrate. YSZ has been proven to be a successful substrate in the fabrication of high-J, (>5 x 10‘ A/cm2 at 77 K) and has a low dielectric loss tangent, 6, at temperatures lower than 250 K (63.005)[43]. This makes it an excellent choice for microwave device applications. Although the lattice parameter for the cubic YSZ (a=.516 nm) is much larger than that of YBCO (a=.382 run), the YBCO/substrate mismatch for the (100) oxygen sublattice is <0.2%. Even in the YSZ[110] // YBCO[100] epitaxial relationship (which is equivalent to the a & b axes of the YBCO film rotated 45° about the c-axis) the mismatch is only 5.9%. With the laser ablation technique, temperature ranges of 700 to 810 °C have been found to produce quality c-axis oriented films on 29 YSZ, and below 650 °C for a- and c-axis mixed orientations[44]. 3.2 Target conditions Laser ablation is a simple technique which requires only one source for deposition of film material. A stoichiometric target of YBazCu3O7 is used in this case. The target is usually prepared by the sintering process or can be purchased. Targets are usually .5" or larger in diameter and a few mm thick. Target conditions can affect thin film properties and some of which include: porosity of the target, smoothness of the target surface, target rotation, and target-to—substrate distance. The first two, porosity and smoothness, are qualities of the target and have an affect on the surface particle size and density. Particulates are a common problem in laser ablated films with particle densities of our films commonly on the order of 104 - 10°/cm2. Their presence has been shown not to affect J, and T,, but they impede microelectronic device fabrication efforts. The best quality YBCO films have been achieved when the target is rotated. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the target surface after ablation (non- rotated) show yttrium-rich cones, clusters, and other rough features[45]. These unwanted clusters may be removed and deposited on the substrate during subsequent depositions. In addition, the change in target surface morphology has been shown to reduce deposition rates. If a low target porosity is used and the target is scraped with a razor blade or sanded after each deposition, particle density can be reduced, but not eliminated. The target-to-substrate distance also affects particle density, film thickness and film uniformity [46, 47]. Target-to-substrate distance must be optimized with oxygen partial pressure and laser fluence. 30 3.3 Laser Types and Conditions There are various laser types used for ablation today: multiple-mode excimer lasers (193, 248, 308, 351 nm), neodymium-yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd-YAG) lasers (1064, 533, 355 nm) and continuous wave (CW) CO2 lasers. Ablation efficiency and film quality are important for evaluation of the laser. The excimer lasers have been the most successful of the lasers for producing quality YBCO films. They can produce high energy pulsed output at up to 800 mJ/pulse. In addition, the higher the absorption coefficient of the laser on YBCO, the thinner the evaporated surface layer. The reflection coefficient should also be small for efficiency of optical energy transfer. For example, using an Nd- YAG laser (1.06 11m) at a fluence of .6 J/cmz, the melt front propagates to a maximum depth of .55 um and the surface temperature does not reach the ablation temperature [48]. Excimer lasers have a much higher absorption coefficient and can reach ablation temperatures at smaller melt depths. Table 3.2 summarizes the estimated reflection and Table 3.2: Reflection and absorption coefficients for various lasers incident on YBCO.(Afier Wu, Reference 49) - W V '_ _r_r_ 0. .5 u 1 Carbon Dioxide ~ 10 0.5 0.75 Nd:YAG 1.064 1.2 0.18 Nd:YAG (M2) 0.533 1.5 0.14 Nd:YAG (M3) 0.355 1.7 0.12 Excimer XeF 0.351 1.7 0.12 XeCl 0.308 1.9 0.12 KrF 0.248 2.3 0.13 ArF 0.193 2.4 0.15 31 absorption coefficients of YBCO for various lasers [49]. The absorption coefficient is denoted by a. The table shows that the excimer lasers are the optimum choice in terms of low-reflection of the YBCO target material. Laser deposition parameters such as laser wavelength, repetition rate, and fluence also affect film properties such as surface particle density, J,, and stoichiometry. It has been found that the longer wavelength CW--CO2 and Nd-YAG lasers are less effective than the shorter wavelength excimer lasers in producing quality laser ablated YBCO films. Shorter wavelength lasers have been found to reduce particle densities [50,51]. A typical laser ablated YBCO film deposited using a 193 nm excimer laser has less than 1% of the surface area covered with particulates. An SEM of a YBCO film prepared under the same conditions with a 1.064 um Nd-YAG laser shows 60% of the area covered with surface particles. The results for the frequency doubled (534 nm) and frequency tripled (355 um) Nd-YAG lasers are better with particle densities of 5% and 2% respectively. Variance of repetition rate from 2 to 15 Hz showed particle density decreases with decreasing repetition rate. A recent comparison of laser wavelength also shows the use of shorter wavelength lasers improves critical current density[52]. Particle density is also reduced with reduced laser fluence over the range of 3.5 to 1.7 J/cm2[47]. In addition to affecting particle density, laser fluence also has an impact on stoichiometry and deposition rate. Based upon experimental and theoretical results, there exists a threshold for appreciable evaporation of target material. Below this limit, there is no evidence of surface melting. This energy density threshold, Em, has been estimated using a quadrapole mass spectrometer [53]. E, for the excimer lasers was .279 J/cm2 for 351 nm, .141 J/cm2 308 nm, .050 J/cm2 for 248 nm, and .066 J/cm2 for 193 nm. For the 32 1.064 um Nd-YAG laser, the threshold energy density value was measured as .660 J/cmz. Under low fluence conditions (<.5 J/cmz), there is only one velocity component of the emitted species which has been measured to be $105 cm/sec[54]. Under increased irradiation (>1 J/cmz), the velocity distribution (measured by time- of-flight (TOF) mass spectroscopy) shows a twin-peak distribution containing a larger (>106 crn/sec, believed to be caused by scattering[44]) and a smaller velocity component (210’ cm/sec). For typical YBCO deposition pressures (150-200 mTorr) the velocities are unaffected by pressure initially, due to the formation of a shock wave in which the species are almost collision free[55]. Afier the shock wave disappears, the fragments/species approach the substrate and slow down due to the collisions with the residual oxygen. The velocity of the emitted species can affect the amount of material reaching the substrate in oxide form, a necessary condition for stoichiometric growth of YBCO. Furthermore, at lower oxygen partial pressures (<10 mTorr) there is no shock wave and the collisions due to residual oxygen are also reduced. The result is high species/fragment velocities for a longer distances away from the target. These experiments will be discussed in section 3.4 in greater detail since the velocity components are also related to the oxygen partial-pressure. These results also suggest that there may be a fluence limit, E, for optimal growth of YBCO films at a particular oxygen pressure[56]. An upper limit or E,WAX has not been defined because lengthening the target to substrate distance may compensate for increased velocities caused by high irradiation conditions. 3.4 Oxygen partial pressure effects Oxygen ambient pressure is critical for YBCO growth; it affects stoichiometry, T,, 33 J,, and film thickness. Many groups studying laser-ablation used spectroscopy to determine the velocity of the plume species and content of the plume [57,58,59,60,61]. Recently, Sakeek et al. used TROSP (time-resolved optical absorption spectroscopy) to study the expansion of the plume [57]. In 500 mTorr 02 the expansion velocities of the molecular fragments/species (YO, Ba“, Ba, Y, Y‘, Cu) were found to be approximately 2.5x10’ cm/s at distances 3 5mTorr). Best results were obtained at substrate temperatures of 750 to 820 °C with the luminous tip of the laser-induced plume at the substrate surface. For this 'luminous tip' condition, the target-to-substrate distancewas found to be 4 to 6 cm, depending on laser fluence and oxygen partial pressure. T,(R=0) values were as high as 89 K and the measured J, at 78.5 K was as high as 1.6 x 10‘ A/cmz. Extrapolating the J, curve, the value at 77 K was approximately 1.9 x 10‘ A/cmz. The surface morphology was rough; it contained particles and lenticular-shaped outgrowths. X-ray diffraction patterns showed a high degree of c—axis orientation. A tunable-stub microwave cavity (excited using 2.45 OHz microwave radiation) was used at high oxygen partial pressures (>35 mTorr) to deposit YBCO films. The T,(R=0) was found to be as high as 86.5 K and J, was as high as 1.1 x 10‘ A/cm2 at 77 K. Activated oxygen enhanced films did not exhibit markedly better properties than molecular oxygen films at these pressures. Atomic-oxygen-enhanced laser-ablation deposition at low-pressures (<_lOmTorr) was employed using an MPDR at an excitation frequency of 2.45 GHz. The ECR oxygen plasma from the MPDR created a high atomic-oxygen flux region (approx. 10” /cm2-sec) 77 78 and permitted successful deposition of YBCO on YSZ at 4 mTorr. The T,(R=0) was 79 K for the best film, and the J, for the same film measured 2.9 x 10‘ A/cm2 at 77 K. X- ray diffraction patterns revealed that the film was c-axis oriented. SEM images showed a much rougher surface morphology than films prepared at higher pressures (150-200 mTorr). 6.2 Conclusions and Suggestions A possible explanation for the broad R=0 transitions of some of our films may lie in the nature of the oxygen-indiffusion cool-down step. This deficiency may be due in part to rapid cooling (quenching) in conjunction with insufficient oxygen partial pressures. The burnout of the heater filament caused rapid cooling at approximately 2 Torr, well below the 200 Torr oxygen partial pressure used with the Si3N4 heater. With the difficulty in devising an adequate heating apparatus for use with the MPDR-610, inappropriate cool-down procedure may have been responsible for the low T,(R=0) of most of these films. Metal-oxide contamination may also have contributed to the poor quality of these films. Several modifications to the laser ablation apparatus may improve film quality at low pressures. With an external optical-heater, better control of the cooling procedure would be possible. An optical heater would be compatible with the MPDR and would not introduce contaminants into the ablation chamber. A larger diameter processing chamber may also help to optimize the target-to-substrate distance at low pressures. Further work necessary for optimizing laser ablated YBCO growth at lowered temperatures (<650°C) and at lowered oxygen partial pressures (<35 mTorr). One suggestion is to use an excitation frequency of 915 MHz to form the ECR plasma. 79 Recent measurements indicate the atomic species present in the oxygen plasma of the MPDR-610 are orders of magnitude higher for this excitation frequency [85]. LIST OF REFERENCES A. Sleight, "Synthesis of Oxide Superconductors," Physics Today, June 1991, pp.24-30. "An Interview with Venky Venkatesan," Supercurrents, July 1989, 49-58. [1] [21 [3] R. Singh, J. Narayan, A. Singh, and J. Krishnaswamy, "In Situ Processing of Epitaxial Y-Ba-Cu-O high T, Superconducting Films on (100) SrTiO3 and (100) YS-ZrO2 Substrates at SOD-650°C," Appl. Phys. Lett. 54 (22), May 29, 1989, pp.227l-3. Kamo, and S. Matsuda, "Properties of [4] T. Nabatame, Y. Saito, K. Aihara, T. leBa2CaQCu3O, Thin Films with a Critical Temperature of 122 K Prepared by Exicimer Laser Ablation," Jap. Jour. of App. Phys, V. 29, No. 10, Oct. 1990, L18 13-1815. [5] M. Dilorio, "Preparation of High-T, YBaQCu3O7,x Thin F ilms," Proc. of the SPIE Conf., Vol. 1287, San Diego, March 20-21, 1990. [6] Kittel, C., Introduction to Solid State Physics, Chapter 12, 1974. J. File and R. G. Mills, Physical Rev. Lett. 10, 93, 1963. l 71 [8] M. Aslam, Lecture Notes [9] B. D. Josephson, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1, 251(1962). [10] B. D. Josephson, Advan. Phys, 14, 419(1965). [11] B. D. Josephson, Rev. Mod. Phys. 46, 251(1974). [12] V. Ambegaokra and Baratoff, Phys. Rev. Lett, 10, 486,( 1963). PIE 1 8 onfer nce n A vance in i n uct r and " NeWport Beach, California, [13] 1 C. Vanneste, Supercgndugtors, ”Superconductor/Light Interaction, March 14, 1988, pp 50-65. [14] M. Decroux, "High T, Superconducting Based Sensors, " Sensors and Actuators, A21 -A23(1 990)9-14. 80 81 [15] Robins, D., Introduction to Superconductivig, Chapter 3, IBC Technical Services Ltd., London, 1989. M. Beasley, "High Temperature Superconductive Thin Films," Proceedings of the IEEE, V. 77, N.8, Aug.,l989, pp. 1155-1163. [17] R. Roas, B. Hensel, G. Endres, L.Schultz, S. Klaumunzer, and G. Saemann - Ischenko, "Superconducting Properties and Irradiation Induced Effects of Epitaxial YBaCuO Thin Films,"Physica C, 162-164,(1989),135-6. [16] [18] D. Miller, P. Richards, S. Etemad, A. Inam, T. Venkatesan, B. Dutta, and X. Wu "Residual Losses in Epitaxial Thin Films of YBa2Cu3O7 from Microwave to Submillimeter Wave F requencies," Appl. Phys. Lett. 59 (18), Oct. 28,1991 ,2326-8. [19] L. Lee, K. Char, M. Colclough, and G. Zaharchuk, "Monolithic 77 K DC SQUID Magnetometer," Appl. Phys. Lett. 59 (23), Dec. 2, 1991, 3051-3. [20] R. Muenchausen, X. D. Wu, S. Foltyn, R. Estler, R. Dye, A. Garcia, and N Nogar, "High Rate Growth of YBa2Cu307,x Thin Films Using Pulsed Excimer Laser Deposition," Mat. Res. Symp. Proc. V191, 177-181. [21] T. Goto, H. Masumoto, and T. Hirai, "Preparation of YBazCu3O,_x Films by ECR Plasma Sputtering," J.Journ. of Appl. Phys, V. 28, (1), 1989, pp.L88-90. [22] D. Kubinski and D. Hoffman, "Reactive Codeposition of In Situ Y-Ba-Cu-O Superconducting Films Using Dilute Mixtures of Ozone in Oxygen," J. Appl. Phys.,V 71(4), Feb. 1992. PP.1860-7. [23] R. Singh and J. Narayan, "Pulsed-Laser Evaporation Technique for Deposition of Thin Films: Physics and Theoretical Model," Physical Rev. B, VA], (13), Mayl, 1 990,8843-59. [24] J. Dawson, P. Kaw, and B. Green, Phys. Fluids 12, 875 (1969). [25] S. Witanachchi, H. Kwok, X. Wang, and D. Shaw, "Deposition of Superconducting Y-Ba-Cu-O Films at 400°C Without Post-annealing," Appl. Phys. Lett., 53 (3), July 18, 1988, pp. 234-6. [26] H. Izumi, K. Ohata, T. Hase, K. Suzuki, T. Morishita, and S. Tanaka, "Superconductivity and Crystallinity of BazYCu;,O7 x Thin Films Prepared by Pulsed Laser Deposition with Substrate Bias Voltage," J. Appl. Phys, 68( 12) Dec. 15, 1990, 6331-35. [27] A. Gupta and B. Hussey, "Laser Deposition of YBa2Cu3O.,,x Films Using a Pulsed Oxygen Source," Appl. Phys. Lett. 58 (11), Mr. 18, 1991, pp. 1211-3. 82 [28] J. Kwo, M. Hong, D. Trevor, R. Fleming, A. White, J. Mannaerts, R. Farrow, A. Kortan, and K. Short, "In Situ Growth of YBazCu3O7,x Films by Molecular Beam Epitaxy with an Activated Oxygen Source," Physica C 162- 164( l989),pp. 623-624. [29] J. Greer, "In-Situ Growth of YBaZCu3O7_x Thin Films on Three-Inch Wafers Using Laser-Ablation and an Atomic Oxygen Source," Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference on Superconductivity and Applications, Buffalo, N. Y., Sept. 1989. [30] K. Yamamoto, B. Lairson, C. Eom, R. Hammond, J. Bravman, and T. Geballe, "Role of Atomic Oxygen Produced by an Electron Cyclotron Resonance Plasma in the Oxidation of YBa2Cu3O7,x Thin Films Studied by In Situ Resistivity Measurement," Appl. Phys. Lett. 57 (18), Oct. 29, l990,pp. 1936-1938. [31] R. Humphreys, N. Chew, J. Edwards,J. Satchell, S. Goodyear, and S. Blenkinsop, "Oxygenation of YBaZCuJOx Thin Films and Multilayers," Supercond. Sci. Technol. 4 (1991), pp. 3172-174. [32] P. O’Keeffe, S. Komuro, S. Den, T. Morikawa, and Y. Aoyagi, "The Irradiation Effects of an Oxygen Radical Beam on the Preparation of Superconducting Thin Films," Jap. Jour. of Appl. Phys. V. 30 (5A), May, 1991, pp. L834-L837. [33] P. O'Keeffe, S. Komuro, S. Den, T. Moriwawa, and Y. Aoyagi, "Development and Applications of a Compact Electron Cyclotron Resonance Source," Jap. Jour. of Appl. Phys. v. 30 (1113), Nov., 1991, pp. 3164-3168. [34] M. Norton and C. Carter, "Effect of Substrate on the Early Stages of the Growth of YBaQCu307,x Thin-Films," Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. V. 191 ,1990,pp.165-l70. [3 5] R. Singh and Narayan, "Nature of Epitaxial Growth of High-T, laser-deposited Y- Ba-Cu-O Films on (100) Strontium Titanate Substrates," J. Appl. Phys. 67(8), Apr. 15, 1990, 3785-90. [36] H.0hlsen, J. Huddner, and L. Stolt, " Thin Films of Y-Ba-Cu-O on Sapphire Substrates," Proc. of ICMC'90 Top. Conf. on High Temperature Superconductor Material Aspects, May 9-11, 1990. [37] H. Ohlsen, J. Hudner, L. Stolt, and E. Johansson, "Y-Ba-Cu-O Thin Films on Sapphire Substrates," Physica C 162-164 (1989), pp. 621-622. [38] P. Tiwari, S. Sharan, and J. Narayan, "In Situ Single-Chamber Laser Processing of YBa1,Cu,O,,x Superconducting Thin F ilrns on Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia Buffered (100) GaAs," Appl. Phys. Lett., 59 (3), July 15, 1991, pp.357-9. [39] M. Rao, E. Tarsa, L. Samoska, J. English, A. Gossard, H. Kroemer, P. Petroff,E Hu, "Superconducting YBaCuO Thin F ilrns on GaAs/AlGaAs," Appl. Phys. Lett. [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] 83 56 (19), May 7, 1990, pp. 1905-7. X. Wu, R. Muenchausen, N. Nogar, A. Pique, R. Edwards, B. Wilkens, T. Ravi, D. Hwang, and C.Chen, "Epitaxial Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia on (1102) Sapphire for YBazCu307,x Thin Films," Appl. Phys. Lett. 58 (3), jan. 21, 1991, pp. 304-6. M. Aslam, R. Soltis, E. Logothetis, R. Ager, M. Mikkor, W. Win, J. Chen, and L. Wenger, "Rapid Thermal Annealing of YBaCuO Films on Si and SiO2 Substrates," App. Phys. Lett. 53 (2), July 11, 1988, pp. 153-155. A. Fartash, I. Schuller, and J. Pearson, "Solid-State Reactions in High- Temperature Superconductor-Ceramic Interfaces: Y-Ba-Cu-O on A1203 versus Yttria-Stabilized ZrOz, and MgO," J. Appl. Phys.,67(5), Mar. l,1990,pp.2524-2527. G. Samara, "Low-Temperature Dielectric Properties of Candidate Substrates for High-Temperature Superconductors: LaAlO3 and ZrOzz9.5 mol % YZO3," J. Appl. Phys, 68 (8), Oxt. 15, 1990, pp. 4214-4219. H.Izumi, K. Ohata, T. Sawada, t. Morishita,a nd S. Tanaka, "Deposition Pressure Effects on the Laser Plume of YBazCu3O,,x," Jap. Journ. of Appl. Phys, V. 30, No. 9A, Sept, 1991, pp. 1956-58. J. P. Zheng, Z. Huang, D. Shaw, H. Kwok, "Generation of High-Energy Atomic Beams in Laser-Superconducting Target Interactions," Appl. Phys. Lett. 54 (3), Jan. 16, 1989, pp. 280-2 K. Erington and N. Ianno, "Thin Films of Uniform Thickness by Pulsed Laser Deposition," Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., V. 191, 1990, pp. 115-20. D. Misra and S. Palmer, "Laser Ablated Thin Films of YBazCu3O,_x: the Nature and Origin of the Particles," Physica C, 176 (1991), 43-48. T. Nakarniya, K. Ebihara, P. John, and B. Tong, "Computer Simulation of Pulsed Laser Ablation for YBaCuO Superconducting F ilms," Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., V. 191, 1990, pp. 109-114. X. Wu, T. Venkatesan, A. Inam, X. Xi, Q. Li, W. McLean, C. Chang, D. Hwang, R. Ramesh, L. Nazar, B. Wilkens, S. Schwartz, R. Ravi, J. Martinez, P. England, J. Tarascon, RMuenchausen, S. Foltyn, R. Estler, R. Dye, A. Garcia, and N. Nogan, "Pulsed Laser Deposition of High T, Superconducting Thin Films: Present and Future," Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., V. 191, 1990, pp. 129-139._ 0. Eryu, K. Murakarni, K. Masuda, K. Shihoyama, and T. Mochizuki, "Strong Wavelength Dependence of Laser Ablation Fragments of Superconductor YBazCu307," Jap. J. Appl. Phys. V. 31, N. 2A, Feb. 1,1992, pp. L86-8. [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] 84 A. Cheenne, J. Perriere, F. Kerhereve, G. Hauchecome, E. Fogarassy, C. Fuchs, "Laser Assisted Depsition of Thin BiSrCaCuO F ilms," Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 191, 1990, pp. 229-234. G. Koren, A. Gupta, R. Baseman, M. Lutwyche,a nd R. Laibowitz, "Laser Wavelength Dependent Properties of YBazCu3O7,x Thin Films Deposited by Laser Ablation, Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 1989,pp. 2450-2. L. Wiedeman and H. Helvajian, "UV Tunable Laser Ablation of YBazCu3Ox,,: Changes in the Product POpulation and Kinetic Energy Distributions as a Function of the Laser Wavelength and Target Bulk Temperature," Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. V. 191, 1990, pp. l99-204. L. Wiedeman and H. Helvajian, "Threshold Level Laser Ablation of YBaZCu3O,,,,5 at 351 nm, 248 nm, and 193 nm: Ejected Product Population and Kinetic Energy Distributions," Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. V. 191, 1990, pp. 217-222. A. Gupta, B. Braren, K. Casey, B. Hussey, and R. Kelly, "Direct Imaging of the Fragments Produced During Excimer Laser Ablation of YBazCu,O7_x," Appl. Phys. Lett. 59 (l 1), Sept. 9, 1991, 1302-1304. T. Okada, N. Shibamaru, Y. Nakayama, and M. Maeda, "Investigations of Behavior of Particles Generated from Laser-Ablated YBa2Cu3O7,x Target Using Laser-Induced Fluorescence," Appl. Phys. Lett. 60 (8), Feb. 24, 1992, 941-943. H. Sakeek, T. Morrow, W. Graham, and D. Walmsley, "Optical Absorption Spectroscopy Study of the Role of Plasma Chemistry in YBaZCu3O7 Pulsed Laser Deposition, Appl. Phys. Lett., 59 (27), Dec. 30, 1991, pp 3631-3. W. Weimer, "Plasma Emission from Laser Ablation of the High-Temperature Superconductor YBa2Cu3O7," Appl. Phys. Lett. 52(25), June 20,1988,pp.2171-21 73. T. Venkatesan, X. D. Wu, A. Inam, and J. Wachtrnan, "Observation of Two Distinct Components During Pulsed Laser Deposition of High T, Superconducting Films," Appl. Phys. Lett. 52 (14), April 4, 1988, pp. 1193-1195. D. Goehegan and D. Mashbum, "Spectroscopic and Ion Probe Characterization of the Transport Process Following Laser Ablation of Y832Cu30x," Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. V. 191, 1990, pp.211-216. K. Saenger, "Time-Resolved Optical Emission During Laser Ablation of Cu, CuO, and High-T, Superconductors: BiHSrmCazCu30x and YBa,,,Cu2_7oy," J. Appl., Phys. 66 (9), Nov. 1, 1989,pp. 4435-4439. J. S. Blakemore, Solid State Physics, c. 1985, pp.251-6. [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] [74] . 175] 85 J. Asmussen, "Electron Cyclotron Resonance Microwave Discharges for Etching and Thin-Film Deposition," J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A 7 (3), May/Jun 1989. A. Srivastava, M. Dahimene, T. Grotjohn, J. Asmussen, "Oprational Performance of a Compact Coaxial ECR Plasma Source for MBE Applications," Wavemat Inc. internal publication, 1991 . V. Matijesevic, E. Garwin, and R. Hammond, "Atomic Oxygen Detection by Silver-Coated Quartz Depositon Monitor," submitted to Appl. Phys. Lett. D. Blank, D. Adelerhof, J. F lokstra, and H. Rogalla, "Parameter Study of In-Situ Grown Superconducting YBaCuO Thin Films Prepared by Laser Ablation," Physica C, 124-126, (1989), pp. 125-126. J. Frohlingsdorf, P. Leiderer, R. Feile, W. Zander, B. Stritzker, "Fast One Step Prepartion of High Quality YBazCu3O.,,x Thin Films by Laser Ablation," Physica C, 162-164, (1989), pp. 123-124. D. Fork, K. Char, F. Bridges, S. Tahara, B. Lairson, J. Boyce, G. Connell, T. Geballe, "YBCO Films on YSZ and A1203 by Pulsed Laser Deposition," Physica C, 162-164,(1989), pp. 121-122. H. U. Haberrneier and G. Mertens, Physica C, 162-164, (1989), pp. 601-2. D. Li, K. Wang, D. Q. Li, R. Chang, J. Ketterson, "Microstructure Studies of Epitaxial YBaQCu3O7.x Films," J. Appl. Phys. 66 (11), Dec. 1, 1989. T. Venkatesan, E. Chase, X. Wu, A. Inam, C. Chang, and F. Shokoohi, Appl. Phys. Lett., 53 (3), July 18, 1988, p.243. R. Russo, R. P. Reade, J. M. McMillan, and B. L. Olsen, "Metal Buffer Layers and Y-Ba-Cu-O Thin Films on PT and Stainless Steel Using Pulsed Laser Depostion," J. Appl. Phys, 68 (3), Aug. 1, 1990, p 1355. A. Carim, S. Basu, and R. Muenchausen, "Dependence of Crystalline Orientation on Film Thickness in Laser-Ablated YBazCu307,x on LaAlO3," Appl. Phys. Lett., 58 (8), Feb. 25 1991. F. Yang, E. Narumi, S. Patel, and D. T. Shaw, "Weak Link Dominated Anisotropy of Critical Current Density in Polycrystalline YBazCu307,x Thin Films," Appl. Phys. Lett., 60 (2), Jan. 13, 1992, pp. 249-251. M. Ohlcubo, T. Kachi, and T. Hioki, "Epitaxial YBazCu3Ox Thin Films with x=6-7 by Oxygen In-Diffusion following Laser Deposition, J. Appl. Phys. 68 (4), Aug. 15, 1990, pp. 1782-1786. ‘ 1761 [77] [781 [791 [80} [81] [82] [83] [84] 86 D. Shi, J. Krucpzak, M. Tang, N. Chen, and R. Bhadra, "Oxygen Diffusion and Phase Transformation in YBaZCu3O7,x," J. Appl. Phys. 66 (9), Nov. 1, 1989, pp. 4325-4328. T. B. Lindemer, F. Washbum, C. MacDougall, R. F eenstra, and O. Cavin, Physica C, 178, 93, (1991). R. Hammond and R. Bormann, "Correlation Between the In Situ Growth Conditions of YBCO Thin Films and the Thermodynamic Stability Criteria," Physica C, 162-164,(1989) 703-4. D. Chrisey, K. Grabowski, and M. Osofsky, "Pulsed Laser Deposition of YBazCu307,x in an Oxygen Background and Discharge," Physica C, 162- 164(1989), pp. 129-130. M. Itoh, H. Ishigaki, and K. Demizu, "Influence of Carbon on Critical Temperatures of Superconducting YBaZCu3O,_x, Jap. Jour. of Appl. Phys, V.28, N.9, Sept, 1989, pp. L1527-1530. Y. Zhao, W. Chu, D. Christen, E. Jones, M. Davis, J. Wolfe, S. Deshmukh, and D. Economou, "Linewidth Dependence of Critical Current Density in YBaQCu3O7 Thin-Film Microbn'dges," Appl. Phys. Lett. 59 (9), Aug. 26, 1991. C. Chang, X. Wu, R. Ramesh, X. Xi, T. Ravi, T. Venkatesan, D. Hwang, R Muenchausen, S. Foltyn, and N. Nogar, "Origin of Surface Roughness for C-Axis Oriented Y-Ba-Cu-O Superconducting F ilms," Appl. Phys. Lett. 57 (17), Oct. 22, 1990, pp. 1814-6. R. Ramesh, A. Inam, D. Hwang, T. Sands, C. Chang, D. Hart, "Surface Outgrowth Problem in C-Axis Oriented Y-Ba-Cu-O Superconducting Thin F ilrns," Appl. Phys. Lett. 58 (14), April 8, 1991, pp. 1557-1559. A. Berezin, S. Pan, E. Ogawa, R. Silver, and A. De Lozanne, "Thin Films of YBaCuO Grown In-Situ By Co-Evaporation and Plasma Oxidation, Physica C, 162-164 (1989), pp. 657-8. [85] J. Asmussen, Private communication. l’lIlCHI 1111111111111111111111111111111I111111 3008779195 \ 1| \ , I -. II II II .\ .5 II V ,, #00: II or . QM. - ell-Illllll w uIllllllIlIl-I HICHIGQN STQTE 11311 111111111111111 779195