u- an nuJ un-r» 3:24: ; . 153$, I? ,_ g}: fA,L1 .4.- £ 35;. s H .. k. .=. r . . 4 .n wk? u mfimfifiwv 4 . 1.354% . 9.. .... .m . . . 4.....«nka. ... in... $52? 'JK . 2‘1‘4 3 ‘ . V . .« . . ‘ . fia......v.u._..... .1 _ Marx“... n .75... . 3... if“... ... . «an. ‘3: in... .395 a 3; 33%: P 3. 4.... . » {$.35 :2; ‘ .. a ram». .53...“ uh. :39: . . x s .wmlnvsvnnn r mu}? tidburdu r... 3.9.; 7.... .r; , . )1 P1153; 2...: .53... a .1. M as oval. 2?; “$-33“ » ‘pa‘Vz—fil) q .. ’95“??? 1.5.15 ” a... f... .0). .39) a; . I). . l. 9...}... if: 4.. .t‘ ‘ ’12 l‘ ES :23 .. .. “a . .2 . . : . 20.3.1... , 3.3.3.. .33.. . 5.9,. .65.: . I355;- a:.l‘x..lc s~nzlu§xr .31. xi.) Z. ’23.; i F; ’htm V DD! 1. I... %?S.f~£\)£ta Iv ‘Yuul ~§?X.‘.r.\n$s ‘ \ 9|‘\.§\I~sw ’1‘ ll .x...ya).k~ n s 0 .I:.. . ns’txi: 1...!) .ss‘. 1 1.1... ? )1. 1o. .‘z.‘~lt~bsa‘)}1~is 54!}: {.fivbtvtt. i '1. tr..£\r.:\s:vk ‘\§‘VI)L\ a: 333.1}: ~fl.‘.59..b ) ‘ ‘9 :§‘ 1.2: “It 2... ‘ r Adv...“ nun. 2 s .rfiulafl. .2 y . . y . .2. . cl!.\%\.o‘x It..|..!bdl| x....l.:>lxulr....il§u €-X.E-,..l..tt.l\~ W..- i... x : 95.5 I .filssull .ttlsz‘l. luv." 3 “1“?)le . I .. 5.1“ {1.11% 15.15». Mtg-21.1.53... $th 31.! 1:3 f at .. TA BEAR Iiilii'x‘ii'iilnlifiimmlIi Ilium 3 1293 01021 9768 This is to certify that the dissertation entitled MECHANISTIC STUDIES OF Klebsiella aerogenes UREASE AND ITS NICKEL METALLOCENTER ASSEMBLY PROCESS presented by IL-SEON PARK has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for Ph. D degree in my .’/ If / 71’; / \ ,’ . .r’ / (fl " /(Vf/ , 7 m/zuuuvfrb‘l V _ ,1 ROBERT P. HASINGER Major professor Date—mg...— MSUi: an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Institution 0-12771 LIBRARY Michigan State Universlty PLACE ll RETURN BOXtonmavothb checkout“! yum TO AVOID FINES Mum on or baton data duo. DATE DUE DATE DUE DATE DUE MSU loAn mmmw Opponmuy lthon W1 MECHANISTIC STUDIES OF Klebsiella aerogenes UREASE AND ITS NICKEL METALLOCENTER ASSEMBLY PROCESS BY lL-SEON PARK A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Microbiology 1994 ABSTRACT MECHANISTIC STUDIES OF Klebsiella aerogenes UREASE AND ITS NICKEL METALLOCENTER ASSEMBLY PROCESS By lL-SEON PARK Chemical modification and site-directed mutagenesis methods were used to examine the mechanism of Klebsiella aerogenes urease. The enzyme is inactivated by diethylpyrocarbonate (DEP) in a manner consistent with the presence of at least one essential histidine per catalytic unit. Each of ten conserved histidine residues (H96 in the 7 subunit, H39 and H41 in B, and H134, H136, H219, H246, H312, H320 and H321 in the a subunit) was substituted with alanine. The yH96A, BH39A, BH41A, aH312A and aH321A mutant proteins possess activities and nickel contents similar to wild-type. The aH134A, aH136A and aH246A proteins exhibit no detectable activity and possess 550% of the nickel content of wild-type enzyme. The aH219A protein is active and has nickel (~1.9% and ~80%, respectively, when compared to wild-type protein), but exhibits a very high Km value (1100:40 mM compared to 23:02 mM for the wild-type enzyme). Finally, the aH320A protein (Km=8.3:0.2 mM) only displays ~0.003% of the wild-type enzyme activity, and has a normal nickel content. This mutant protein is not inactivated by DEP. These results are consistent with aH134, aH136 and aH246 functioning as nickel ligands, aH219 having some role in facilitating substrate binding, and aH320 being the DEF-reactive general base that facilitates catalysis. I In vivo assembly of the urease metallocenter is known to require four accessory proteins: UreD, UreE, UreF and UreG. In vitro activation of purified K. aerogenes urease apoprotein has now been accomplished by simply providing CO; (half-maximal activation at ~0.2% C02) in addition to nickel ion. Activation requires that CO; be incorporated into urease in a pH- dependent reaction “K. 2 9). I propose that CO; binding to urease apoprotein generates a ligand that facilitates productive nickel binding. Site- directed mutagenesis methods were used to overexpress ureD in the presence of the other urease genes, and UreD was found to co-purify with urease. The UreD-urease apoprotein complexes are activated in a C02- dependent manner. And, as for urease apoprotein, the activation is accompanied by non-productive nickel-binding. The presence of UreD, however, appears to reduce the rate of this inactivation step. To my family, with respect and love. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First of all, I would like to thank Dr. Hausinger for his intelectual guidance, encouragenment and care with so much patience. I would also like to thank my commettee members: Dr. Tom Deits, Dr. Lee Kroos, Dr. John Breznak, and Dr. Mickel Bagdasarian. In addition, I would like to thank my collaborators: Mathew Todd, Mann-hyung Lee, Rick Martin, Fumiyasu Fukumori, Vladimir Romanov, Mary Beth Carr, Ruth Walace, Tim, Taha, and Linda. I thank the Microbiology department, its office members and Dr. Ron Patterson for guiding me to complete my degree. Special thanks also go to Dr. Sang-Dai Park for being my first professor and letting me have firm basis as a biologist. I am also indebted to Dr. Kyung-Ja Ryu for her care and encouragement, and Dr. Yoo-Hun Suh for teaching me molecular biology. Finally, I thank my parents who always give me all support they can do at any cost and my brothers and relatives for their encouragement and support as always. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables“ Vii List of Figures Viii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Medical significance """""" 3 Agricultural significance 4 Urease structural properties 5 Urease active site 6 Urease hydrolysis mechanism 8 In vivo activation of urease apoprotein 9 Accessory genes for urease activation 10 In vitro activation of urease apoprotein and the probable role of UreD 12 Eukaryotic ureases 12 Outline of this thesis 14 References 16 Chapter 2. Diethylpyrocarbonate reactivity of Klebsiella aerogenes urease: effect of pH and active site ligands on the rate of inactivation "1°25 Abstract 26 Introduction 27 Materials and methods 28 Materials 28 Enzyme purification 28 Kinetics of urease inactivation 28 Spectroscopy 28 Recovery of enzyme activity by NH20H treatment """"""""""" 29 Results and Discussion 29 Chapter 3. Inactivation of urease by DEP 29 Effect of ligands on the rate of urease inactivation by DEF 32 Effect of pH on the rate of urease inactivation 34 Reactivation of DEF-modified urease 37 Spectrophotometric analysis of urease reactivity with DEF 37 References 42 Site-directed mutagenesis of Klebsiella aerogenes urease: Identification of histidine residues that appear to function in nickel ligation, substrate binding, and catalysis 43 Abstract 44 Introduction 45 ‘ Materials and methods 47 Materials 47 Site-directed mutagenesis 47 Enzyme purification 48 Assay of enzyme activity 49 Nickel quantitation 49 Thermal stability 49 Inactivation by DEF 50 Inactivation by IAM 50 Results 50 Initial characterization of mutant proteins 50 Thermal stabilities of mutant ureases 54 pH dependence of mutant urease activities 54 Inactivation of mutant ureases by DEF 57 Inactivation of mutant proteins by IAM 60 iv Chapter 4. Chapter 5. Chapter 6. Discussion 63 References 65 In vitro activation of urease apoprotein and role of UreD as a chaperone required for nickel metallocenter assembly """""""""" 69 Abstract 70 Introduction 71 Materials and methods 72 Site-directed mutagenesis of the ureD ribosome binding site 72 Cell growth and disruption 73 Purification of UreD-urease apoprotein complex """""""""""" 73 Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis 74 Urease activity assays 74 Results 74 In vitro activation of urease apoprotein 74 Purification of UreD-urease apoprotein complex """""""""""" 75 Activation of UreD-urease apoprotein complexes """""""""" 81 Discussion 83 References 87 Carbon dioxide is required for in vitro assembly of the urease nickel metallocenter I 89 Abstract 90 References and notes 98 Related studies, and prospects for further research 100 Characterization of aHis-219 and aHis-312 mutant proteins """"" 101 V Function of UreD in urease apoprotein activation 104 Characterization of UreD 108 Possible role of UreF 114 Presence of a complex containing UreD, urease apoprotein, UreF, and UreG 1 17 Urease apoprotein activation: possible scheme 121 References 125 126 Appendix vi LIST OF TABLES Chapter 3. 1. Characteristics of wild-type and mutant Klebsiella aerogenes ureases 53 2. Thermal stabilites of wild-type and mutant ureases """"""""""""""" 55 Chapter 6. 1. Characteristics of wild-type and selected mutant Klebsiella aerogenes ureases 102 vii Chapter 2. Chapter 3. Chapter 4. 51.0.01? LIST OF FIGURES . Pseudo-first—order urease activity loss in the presence of DEF 30 Effect of DEP concentration on pseudo-first-order rate of inactivation 31 Effect of competitive inhibitors on the rate of urease inactivation by DEF 33 Effect of urea on the rate of urease inactivation by DEP """""""" 35 The pH dependence of DEP inactivation of urease 36 Reactivation of DEF-inactivated urease by hydroxylamine """"" 39 Spectroscopic analysis of urease modification by DEF 40 Kinetic comparison of activity and absorbance changes during modification by DEF 41 . Denaturing gel electrophoretic analysis of partially purified urease proteins 52 The pH dependence of urease activity 56 Kinetics of urease inactivation by DEP 58 The pH dependence of DEP inactivation of wild-type and aH219A ureases 59 Kinetics of urease inactivation by IAM o1 The pH dependence of IAM inactivation of wild-type and aH219A ureases 62 viii Chapter 5. Chapter 6. . In vitro activation kinetics of urease apoprotein 76 . SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoretic analysis of UreD and urease fractions 77 . Phenyl-Superose resolution of UreD-urease complexes """""""" 79 . Native polyacrylamide gel electrophoretic analysis of urease fractions 80 . Activation kinetics of the UreD-urease complexes 82 6. Western blot comparison of cell extracts before and after nickel activation 84 . Simplified model illustrating the functional role for UreD in urease apoprotein activation 85 1. In vitro activation of urease apoprotein 94 . In vitro activation of UreD-urease apoprotein complex """"""""""" 96 . The pH dependence of wild-type and mutant urease activity of cell extracts 103 . In vitro activation of the three partially purified UreD-urease apoprotein complexes 106 . Inactivation of the three UreD-urease apoprotein complexes by incubation with nickel prior addition of NaHCOa 109 . Initial activation rates of UreD-urease apoprotein complexes 1 10 . Characterization of UreD 112 . Site-Directed Mutagenesis of the ureF Ribosome Binding Site 115 . Western blot comparison of fractions from Sepharose 6 column chromatography of selected cell extracts 116 ix 8. Western blot comparison of cell extracts 118 9. Partial purification and characterization of the urease-containing 8 complexes 1 19 10. Activation of urease apoprotein associated with the B complexes 122 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 2 A large amount of urea is biologically produced. For example, urea is a product of biodegradation of nitrogenous compounds such as purines, arginine, agmatine, allantoin, and allantoic acid (1). Mammals excrete urea in urine as a detoxification product (2). Although urea is very stable in solution (its half-life is 3.6 years in aqueous solutions at 38°C (3)), it is rapidly hydrolyzed to ammonia and carbamate in the environment through the action of the enzyme urease (urea amidohydrolase, EC 3.5.1.5) (4). Carbamate spontaneously decomposes to form a second molecule of ammonia and carbon dioxide which hydrates to carbonic acid. At normal physiological pH, carbonic acid dissociates into a proton and bicarbonate and ammonia is protonated to yield ammonium ion. Since two moles of ammonium ion and one mole of bicarbonate are produced from the decomposition of one mole of urea, the hydrolysis results in a pH increase (Scheme 1). I"'20 H O NHZCONHZ :9 NHZCOOH v4 co2 \__>\ H2003 # Hco3 Urease 4' + 4’ NH3 NH3 H” 2NH3+2H* Eéié 2NH: Scheme 1 Ureases have been found in a wide range of bacteria, several fungi, a few invertebrates, and a variety of plants (reviewed by Mobley and Hausinger, 5). Until recently, the best-studied urease was that from jack bean. This urease was the first enzyme to be crystallized (6) and also the first shown to contain nickel (7). More recently, urease studies have focused 3 on the bacterial enzymes because of the ease of their genetic manipulation and due to their medical importance. Microbial ureases are important in human health, rumen ecology, and soil nitrogen management. This chapter will present brief overviews of the significance, enzymology and metallocenter biosynthesis of ureases. I will focus this introduction on the ureases of bacteria, although examples from plant and other sources will be mentioned where appropriate. Medical significance. Pathogenic ureolytic microorganisms have been isolated from humans and other animals where they can colonize the urinary tract, the colon, or the stomach. Human urine consists of 0.4 to 0.5 M urea (8) and the urinary tract provides a favorable environment for many ureolytic microorganisms. The hydrolysis of urea by urease from these organisms causes a rise in urine pH leading to supersaturation and precipitation of magnesium and calcium salts (8) to form stones. Approximately 15-20% of all kidney stones are associated with infections by ureolytic microorganisms (9). Proteus mirabilis is the major urease-producing uropathogen in humans (10). Other urease-producing species associated with infection stones have been recognized, including Pseudomonas, Klebsiella, and Staphylococcus spp. (9). Urease has also been shown to be a virulence factor in urinary tract infections that result in pyelonephritis, an inflammation of the kidney (reviewed in 5). Ureolytic microorganisms in the colon or the urinary tract can produce a large amount of ammonia, a toxic compound (11). Under normal conditions, the ammonia can be removed by the liver. However, when the amount of ammonia produced is too excessive or the liver is damaged, the elevated level can cause hyperammonemia (12), ammonia encephalopathy (13), and hepatic coma (14). 4 The urease-producing microbe Helicobacter pylori (formerly Campy/obecter pyloridis) has been implicated in another type of infection. This bacterium has been reported to colonize at intercellular junctions of the mucosal lining of the mammalian stomach (15, 16). The urease of H. pylori rapidly hydrolyzes urea from serum to form large amounts of ammonia. The elevated level of ammonia causes a rise of pH in the immediate region of the stomach and allow the bacteria to grow in a relatively neutral pH range. This organism is associated with development of 8 gastritis (16, 17) and peptic ulcers (18). Agricultural significance. A major limitation to plant growth is the lack of fixed nitrogen in the soil. Urea can be a good nitrogen source because of its ease of application and its high nitrogen content (19). Hydrolysis of urea by soil ureases is necessary before it can be used in the plant. However, uncontrolled hydrolysis can result in the rise of soil pH and ammonia toxicity. Urea hydrolysis may be able to be controlled by using urease inhibitors (20, 21). Although the urease inhibitor phenylphosphorodiamidate appears not to be effective for an increase in production of corn (22), this approach has the potential to solve the problems mentioned above . Microbial ureases are also important in the nitrogen metabolism of ruminant livestocks that contain a forestomach (23). Urea produced from metabolism in liver or other tissues is recycled to the rumen through saliva or the bloodstream. Several ureolytic strains of bacteria including Staphylococcus, Klebsiella, Selenomonas, Succinovibrio, Bifidobacterium, and Ruminococcus spp. (24, 25) hydrolyze urea to produce ammonia, an important nitrogen source for the ruminal bacteria (26). The biomass of the bacteria can be then utilized as a nutrient by the ruminant (reviewed in 5). Urease structural properties. Bacterial ureases are heteropolymeric proteins. For example, the ureases of Klebsiella aerogenes (27), Proteus mirabilis (28, 29), Providencia stuartii (30), Selenomonas ruminantium (27, 31), Morgana/Ia morganii (32), Ureaplasma ureolyticum (33), Lactobacillus reuten’ (34), Lactobacillus fermentum (35), and Bacillus sp. strain TB-90 (36) consist of one large (a; M, = 60,000 to 75,000) and two distinct small subunits (B and y; M, = 8,000 to 11,000). In contrast, the bacterial strain, H. pylori possesses a urease of two subunits; one large subunit (M, = 66,000) is homologous to the a subunit of the other bacterial ureases, whereas the other subunit (8; M, = 29,500) looks like a fusion of the B and 7 subunits of others (37). The stoichiometry of the subunits for bacterial ureases may not be consistent in the different sources. K. aerogenes urease was reported to possess a (043272); structure as deduced by native size and denaturing gel scanning methods; however, a (aBy)3 structure has been established in preliminary X-ray crystallographic analysis. Stoichiometries reported for those of L. reuteri (34) and L. fermentum (35) were 0432)! and (0432”); for P. stuartii (30), am for H. pylori (37), (123472 for Streptococcus mitior (38); however, these enzymes are also likely to be trimers of dimers or trimers. The urease structural genes have been cloned and sequenced from K. aerogenes (39), Proteus vulgaris (40), P. mirabilis (29), U. ureolyticum (41), Bacillus sp. strain TB-90 (36), H. pylori (42), Yersinia enterocolitica (43), Rhizobium meliloti (44), Helicobacter felis (45), Bacillus pasteurii (46), Staphylococcus xylosus (47), Lactobacillus fermentum (48) and jack bean (49). In contrast to the bacterial enzyme, jack bean urease is homohexameric (subunit Mr = 90,770; 73). Comparison of the amino acids and DNA sequences of jack bean (49, 50) and bacterial ureases indicates the genes are highly conserved through evolution. It is likely that the single plant gene 6 of the plant urease was formed via the gene fusion of the multiple structural genes from bacteria. Urease active site. Urease is the first enzyme shown to have nickel (7). All ureases examined possess nickel as a cofactor (5, 51). K. aerogenes urease apoprotein has been prepared from a nickel-deficient culture. In spite of lacking enzyme activity, the apoprotein showed characteristics similar to holoprotein in terms of the composition of urease subunits (52). Furthermore, preliminary X-ray crystallographic analysis showed no difference between the structures of apoprotein and holoprotein except the absence of nickel in the former protein. These results are consistent with the nickel cofactor playing an important role in enzyme catalysis rather than participating in a structural role. Bacterial and plant ureases have been shown to possess 0.8-2.1 mol nickel/mol large subunit (reviewed in 5). In combination with the analysis of slow-binding inhibitors, the K. aerogenes (27, 53) and jack bean (7, 54) ureases have 2 mol nickel/mol catalytic unit. In spectroscopic studies, the interaction of the plant urease with B-mercaptoethanol was shown to produce an increase in absorbance at ~320, ~380, and 425 nm due to a thiolated anion->Ni(ll) charge transfer interaction. The change is associated with a K, of 0.95 mM which is compatible with the K. value of 0.72 mM determined for the competitive inhibitor (55). K. aerogenes urease also interacts with B- mercaptoethanol to result in increased absorbance at 322, 374, and 432 nm with a K, of 0.38 mM (53). This value is again consistent with the K. of 0.55 mM determined kinetically. The close relationship of spectroscopically measured thiol binding to nickel of urease and the inhibitory effect of the thiol on urea hydrolysis supports the assumption that urea binds to nickel during the catalysis. These results again suggest that nickel ions are located proximal to the active site and play a catalytic role (3, 55). 7 X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) of jack bean urease (56, 57, 58) has demonstrated that the nickel is coordinated by a mixture of nitrogen and oxygen ligands, implying the involvement of amino acids containing those atoms in their side chains. In a study involving photooxidation of jack bean urease, it was demonstrated that histidine residues are destroyed when the enzyme is illuminated by intense light in the presence of methylene blue. The photooxidation was found to be suppressed in the presence of the tight- binding urease inhibitor, acetohydroxamic acid (59). This early chemical modification study suggests the presence of one or more histidine residue located proximal to the active site. K. aerogenes urease apoprotein showed reactivity with diethylpyrocarbonate (DEP), a histidine-selective modifier (52). In the following site-directed mutagenesis studies (Chapter 3, 60), H134, H136, and H246 residues of the a subunit of K. aerogenes urease were substituted with alanine. The aH134A, aH136A and aH246A mutant proteins have no detectable activities and possess one or fewer nickel ion bound per active site (60). These results strongly suggest the ligation of nickel by these histidine residues. The presence of two ionizable groups essential for urease activity was proposed from the pH dependence studies with the K. aerogenes urease enzyme (29). One group (pK,=6.5) must be deprotonated and a second group (pK.=8.9) must be protonated for catalysis. Although the identity of these residues was unknown at the time, the former residue was proposed to act as a general base and the latter one as a general acid. In succeeding experiments with the same urease it was found that the histidine-selective reagent DEP rapidly inactivates the enzyme (Chapter 2, 61) in a modification reaction that is associated with a pK. of 6.5, consistent with modification and inactivation of the residue which acts as the general base. Substitution of aH320 with alanine by site-directed mutagenesis resulted in a mutant protein 8 with very low activity (~0.003% of wild-type protein) that was apparently resistant to DEP (Chapter 3, 60), consistent with this being the residue acting as a general base in urea hydrolysis. K. aerogenes urease is also susceptible to disulfide and alkylating agents. The pH dependence of the inactivation kinetics is compatible with the presence of a single essential thiol interacting with a second ionizable residue together yielding macroscopic pK. values of <5 and 12 (62). Active site labeling studies have identified the cysteine as residue 319 in the a subunit of the urease protein (63). Three site-directed mutant proteins (C319A, C3198, and C319D) showed a shift in pH optimum compared to wild-type enzyme. Based on all these results, the authors proposed that the cysteine residue ionically interacts with a second residue, together acting as a proton donor (general acid) during catalysis (64). Inhibitor studies and inactivator with the same enzyme indicate the presence of a negatively charged residue at the active site. Uncharged or positively charged thiolates were found to have lower Ki values than inhibitors possessing a negatively charged carboxyl group (53). Similarly, negatively-charged chemical reagents inactivate the enzyme more slowly than uncharged or positively charged compounds (62). It is suggested that a negative charge in the active site may repel the carboxylated inhibitors and inactivators. Urea hydrolysis reaction mechanism. A mechanism for the hydrolysis of urea has been proposed for the jack bean urease (65) and the mechanism is retained here (Scheme 2) with some elaboration. One nickel ion in the active site is supposed to bind to the carbonyl oxygen of urease. A general base (His-320) is thought to activate a hydroxide bound to the other nickel ion and it nucleophilically attacks the urea carbon. A molecule of 9 ammonia is released with the action of a general acid (comprising Cys-319 and another unidentified residue) to leave a carbamate. As a final step of catalysis, the carbamate dissociates from the active site and spontaneously decomposes to ammonia and carbon dioxide. Nl—o—c :u—‘o- -NI fondant” 2H9} Ni —o-c\ I—o Nl—o—c _°2 SchemeZ In vivo activation of urease apoprotein. Even in the absence of nickel, urease apoprotein is synthesized in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes (66, 67). Thus, nickel ion appears not to be involved in transcriptional regulation of urease. The addition of nickel to intact K. aerogenes cells was shown to activate urease apoprotein. This slow and partial activation process was found to be independent of protein synthesis, but sensitive to a proton uncoupler, dinitrophenol, or an ATP synthase inhibitor, DCCD (52), indicating that in vivo activation is an energy-dependent process. In vivo activation of urease apoprotein also has been reported for several other bacteria including P. mirabilis (68), a purple sulfur bacterium (69), and a 10 cyanobacterium (70), as well as eukaryotes such as several algae (71) and soybean (67). Accessory genes for urease activation in bacteria. Formation of the nickel-containing urease holoprotein in vivo has been shown to require several genes in addition to the structural genes encoding the urease subunits. For example, the K. aerogenes urease operon has four additional reading frames (ORF’s) which were classified as accessory genes by the authors (39, 72). The ureD gene is located upstream of the ureA, ureB, and ureC genes encoding the urease subunits, and the ureE, ureF, and ureG genes follow the three structural urease genes. The same arrangement of genes has been found in several other microorganisms including P. mirabilis (73, 74), and a ureolytic strain of E.coli (75). The urease operon of Bacillus sp. strain TB-90 has a slightly altered organization of its urease gene cluster, where the location of ureD is downstream of ureG and additional genes, ureH and ureI, are present (36). The urease gene cluster from Helicobacter pylori was shown to have nine genes in three blocks (76). Among them, two may have a regulatory role, two genes encode urease subunits and four genes appear to encode accessory proteins analogous to the counterparts of K. aerogenes. Transposon mutagenesis of the H. pylori urease gene cluster allowed the authors to identify ureF, ureG and ureH (homologous to ureD in K.aerogenes) as the essential accessory genes (76). A similar observation was made in studies with deletion mutants of the urease gene cluster of Bacillus sp. strain TB-90. The deletion of ureE caused somewhat impaired urease activity, whereas, deletions in ureF, ureG, and ureD abolished the enzyme activity (36). The importance of the accessory genes also has been shown in K. aerogenes urease formation (72). Inactive urease protein was synthesized in E.coli carrying the K. aerogenes urease gene cluster with 11 deletions in ureD, ureF, or ureG. The ureases from each deletion mutant turned out to have little or no amount of nickel. The defects of the deletion mutants, however, can be partially or fully repaired by complementation with the plasmid possessing each deleted gene. Furthermore, the ureE deletion mutant synthesizes urease enzyme with reduced activity which roughly corresponds to the reduced nickel content of the purified urease enzyme. All these results indicate that the accessory gene products are trans-acting factors essential for the incorporation of a functional nickel metallocenter into urease protein. It is evident that elucidation of the functions of each accessory protein is essential for understanding the mechanism and control of nickel metallocenter formation. Although not fully understood, several roles of the proteins have been speculated. UreE purified from K. aerogenes has been shown to bind approximately six nickel ions per dimer with a K. of ~10 uM (77). The authors suggested that UreE may bind nickel ion and act as the nickel donor to the urease apoprotein. UreF is expressed in very low amounts in E. coli containing K. aerogenes urease gene cluster. This protein has not been identified or purified except as a part of a protein complex (Chapter 6), which appears to have urease apoprotein, UreD, UreF and UreG. It is possible that UreF may play its unknown role only as a part of the complex. The function of UreG has not been determined, either. However, it is intriguing that the protein was revealed to have a P-loop motif (78) that is found in a variety of ATP- and GTP-binding proteins. This feature and the energy dependence for in vivo nickel ion incorporation suggest that UreG may bind ATP or GTP and couple its hydrolysis to the nickel incorporation event 12 In vitro activation of urease apoprotein and the probable role of UreD. In vitro activation of purified K. aerogenes urease apoprotein has been accomplished by simply providing 002 (half-maximal activation at ~0.2% C02) as well as nickel ion (Chapter 5). Based on the pH-dependent activation (pKa 2 9) and the precedent example of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylaseloxygenase (reviewed by Hartman and Harpel, 79), it is proposed that C02 binds to apoprotein to form a ligand for nickel. Prior to the successful activation of purified urease apoenzyme, in vitro activation of a UreD-urease complex was reported (80, Chapter 4). Since the poor expression of ureD in E. coli harboring the K.aerogenes urease gene cluster was suspected to be due to the weak ribosome-binding site, site- directed mutagenesis methods were used to overexpress the gene. UreD was found to co-purify with urease apoprotein in ion-exchange, size exclusion, and hydrophobic column chromatographies. The UreD-urease apoprotein complexes are able to be activated alone (Chapter 4), but also were shown to be activated in a C02 concentration-dependent manner (Chapter 5). In both the apoprotein and the UreD-apoprotein complex, activation appears to be accompanied by a non-productive reaction that results in enzyme inactivation. However, the presence of UreD evidently reduces the rate of this inactivation step (Chapter 5, Chapter 6). Thus, it was proposed that the UreD protein appears to function, at least in part, to prevent apoprotein from binding nickel non-productively in the absence of C02. Eukaryotic ureases. Urease activities are present in many eukaryotes, including yeast (81), other fungi (82, 83), and plants. Urease from soybean (glycine max) is a well studied eukaryotic enzyme genetically. Four urease-related genes are identified. The Eu1 locus encodes a urease structural gene that is expressed at very high levels in 13 the developing embryo (84, 85, 86). The partial amino acid sequences deduced from cloned genes apparently match those of the purified jack bean urease (87). An isozyme was found to be encoded by the EM locus and is constitutively expressed at low levels in all soybean tissues (88). In addition to the urease structural genes, accessory genes appear to be required for the functional plant enzymes. The defect in Eu2 or Eu3 gene loci result in deficient ureases (89). These loci appear to encode gene products that are required for a maturation of functional urease; for example, nickel ion incorporation. Four complementation groups were identified for the formation of active urease in Aspergillus nidulans (83). It has been found that ureA encodes a urea transport protein, ureB is the single subunit urease enzyme, and ureC is essential for the formation of active urease, but the function is not known. The suppression of a ureD mutation by culture of this organism in the presence of 0.1 mM nickel sulfate (82) indicates that the gene product may play a role in the incorporation of the nickel cofactor. Four loci are also reported to be required for functional urease activity in Neurospora crassa (90) and in Schizosaccharomyces pombe (83). 14 Outline of this thesis The following chapters describe my studies on characterization of Klebsiella aerogenes urease and in vitro activation of urease apoprotein. In Chapter 2, I present evidence that urease possesses at least one essential histidine residue per catalytic unit which may act as a general base [published in J. Protein Chem. 12, 51 -56 (1993) (61)]. In Chapter 3, I describe the generation of and characterization of ten histidine—+alanine mutants by using site- directed mutagenesis. I identify histidine residues that appear to function in nickel ligation, substrate binding, and catalysis [published in Protein Science. 2:1034-1041 (1993) (62)]. In Chapter 4, I describe studies related to in vitro activation of UreD-urease apoprotein complexes. One, two, or three UreD molecules are present per enzyme in different complexes and the UreD protein dissociates from the enzyme during activation (published in PNAS 91:3233-3237 (1994) (80) with results related to the in vitro reconstitution of urease apoprotein in cell extracts by Mary Beth Carr]. In Chapter 5, l characterize apoprotein activation in the presence of 002 and nickel and compare the properties of this process with that for UreD-urease apoprotein complexes [submitted to Science]. Chapter 6 contains several sections. In section A, I describe the characterization of H219NIQ and H320NIQ mutant proteins. In section B, I present studies that further explore the possible role of UreD in the in vitro activation of urease. In section C, partial purification and characterization of UreD are described. In section D, I show evidence consistent with the existence of at least two different forms of UreD-urease protein complex containing the same number of UreD molecules bound per urease apoprotein. In section E, I show the presence of protein complexes containing urease apoprotein, UreD, UreF and UreG and describe its partial 1 5 characterization. In the last section, I suggest speculative models of urease apoprotein activation. Additional studies that l have not included here involve several protein preparations for X-ray crystallographic analysis (urease holoprotein, H134A, H219A, H320A, UreE, and the three, enriched UreD-urease apoprotein complexes), variable temperature magnetic circular dichroism spectroscopy (urease holoprotein, H134A), and X-ray absorption spectroscopy (urease holoprotein, H134A). Finally, the construction of several plasmids that I have made is appended. 10. 11. 12. 16 REFERENCES Vogels, G., and C. van der Drift. 1976. Degradation of purines and pyrimidines by microorganisms. Bacteriol. Rev. 40:403-468. Visek, W. J. 1972. Effects of urea hydrolysis on cell life-span and metabolism. Fed. Proc. 31:1178-1191. Blakeley, R. L., N. E. Dixon and B. Zemer. 1983. Jack bean urease. VII. Light scattering and nickel (II) spectrum. Tiolate->nickel(ll) charge transfer peaks in the spectrum of the B-mercaptoethanol-urease complex. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 744:219-229. Blakeley, R. L., and B. Zemer. 1984. Jack bean urease: The first nickel enzyme. J. Mol. Catalysis. 23:263-292. Mobley, H. L. T., and R. P. Hausinger. 1989. Microbial urease: significance, regulation, and molecular characterization. Microbiol. Rev. 53:85-108. Sumner, J. B. 1926. The isolation and crystallization of the enzyme urease. J. Biol. Chem. 69:435-441. Dixon, N. E., C. Gazzola, R. L. Blakeley, and B. Zemer. 1975. Jack bean urease (EC 3.5.1.5). A metalloenzyme. A simple biological role for nickel? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 97:4131-4233. Griffith, D. P., D. M. Musher, and C. Hin. 1976. Urease: the primary cause of infection-induced urinary stones. Invest. Urol. 13:346-356. Griffith, D. P. 1978. Struvite stones. Kidney Int. 13:372-382. Rubin, R. H., N. E. Tolkoff-Rubin, and R. S. Cotran. 1986. Urinary tract infection, pyelonephritis, and reflux nephropathy. p. 1085-1141. In B. M. Brenner, and F. C. Recor, (ed.), The Kidney. The W. B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia. Cooper, A. J., and F. Plum. 1987. Biochemistry and physiology and brain ammonia. Phys. Rev. 67:440-519. Summerskill, J., F. Thorsell, J. H. Feinberg, and J. S. Aldrete. 1967. Effects of urease inhibition in hyperammonemia: clinical and experimental studies with acetohydroxamic acid. Gastroent. 54:20-26. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 17 Samtoy, B., and M. M. DeBeukeIar. 1980. Ammonia encephalopathy secondary to urinary tract infection with Proteus mirabilis. Pediatrics. 65:294-297. Sabbaj, J., V. L. Sutter, and S. M. Finegold. 1970. Urease and deaminase activities of fecal bacteria in hepatic coma. p. 181 -1 85. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1969. Chen, X. G., P. Corea, J. Offerhaus, E. Rodriguez, F. Janney, E. Hoffmann, J. Fox, F. Hunter, and S. Diavolitsis. 1986. Ultrastructure of the gastric mucosa harboring campylobacter-like organisms. Am. J. Clin. Path. 86:575-582. Dooley, C. P., and H. Cohen. 1988. The clinical significance of Campylobacter pyloridis. Annals Int. Med. 108:70-79. Graham, D. Y., and P. D. Klein. 1987. Campy/obacter pylon'dis gastritis: the past, the present, and speculations about the future. Am. J. Gastroent. 82:283-286. Hazell, S. L., and A. Lee. 1986. Campy/obacter pylon’dis, urease, hydrogen ion back diffusion, and gastric ulcers. Lancet. ii:15-17. Beaton, J. D. 1978. Urea: its popularity grows as a dry source of nitrogen. Crops Soils 30:11-14. Bremner, J. M., and M. J. Krogmeier. 1988. Elimination of the adverse effects of urea fertilizer on seed germination, seeding growth, and early plant growth in soil. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 85:4601-4604. Bymes, B. H., N. K. Savant, and E. T. Craswell. 1983. Effect of a urease inhibitor, phenylphosphorodiamide, on the efficiency of urea applied to rice. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 47:270-274. Tomar, J.S., P.C. Kirby, and A. F. MacKenzie. 1985. Field evaluation of the effects of an urease inhibitor and crop residues on urease hydrolysis, ammonia volatilization, and yield of corn. Can. J. Soil Sci. 65:777-787. Huntington, G. B. 1986. Uptake and transport of nonprotein nitrogen by the ruminant gut. Fed. Proc. 45:2272-2276. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 18 Jones, G. A., R. A. Macleod, and A. C. Blackwood. 1964. Ureolytic rumen bacteria. l. Characterics of the microflora from a urea-fed sheep. Can. J. Microbiol. 10:371-378. Wozney, M. A., M. P. Bryant, L. V. Holdeman, and W. E. C. Moore. 1977. Urease assay and urease-producing species of anaerobes in the bovine rumen and human feces. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 33:1097-1104. Bryant, M. P. 1959. Bacterial species of the rumen. Bacteriol. Rev. 23:125—153. Todd, M. J., and R. P. Hausinger. 1987. Purification and characterization of the nickel-containing multicomponent urease from Klebsiella aerogenes. J. Biol. Chem. 262:5963-5967. Breitenbach, J. M., and R. P. Hausinger. 1988. Proteus mirabilis urease. Partial purification and inhibition by boric acid and boronic acid. Biochemical J. 250:917-920. Jones, B. D., and H. L. T. Mobley. 1988. Proteus mirabilis urease: genetic organization, regulation, and expression of structural genes. J. Bacteriol. 170:3342-3349. Mulrooney, S. B., M. J. Lynch, H. L. T. Mobley, and R. P. Hausinger. 1988. Purification, characterization, and genetic organization of recombinant Providencia stuartii urease expressed by Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 170:2202-2207. Hausinger, R. P. 1986. Purification of nickel-containing urease from the rumen anaerobe Selenomonas ruminantium. J. Biol. Chem. 261 :7866-7870. I-lu, L. T., E. B. Nicholson, B. D. Jones, M. J. Lynch, and H. L. T. Mobley. 1990. Morgana/la morganii urease: purification, characterization, and isolation of gene sequences. J. Bacteriol. 172:3073-3080. Thirkell, D., A. D. Myles, B. L. Precious, J. 8. Frost, J. C. Woodal, M. G. Burdon, and W. C. Russell. 1989. The urease of Ureaplasma ureolyticum. J. Gen. Microbiol. 135:315-323. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 19 Kakimoto, 8., Y. Sumino, 8. Akiyama, and I. Nakatsui. 1989. Purification and characterization of acid urease from Lactobacillus reuteri. Agric. Biol. Chem. 53:1119-1125. Kakimoto, 8., Y. Sumino, K. Kawahara, E. Yamazaki, and I. Nakatsui. 1990. Purification and characterization of an acid urease from Lactobacillus fermentum. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 32:538-543. Maeda, M., M. Hidaka, A. Nakamura, H. Masaki, and T. Uozumi. 1994. cloning, sequencing, and expression of thermophilic Bacillus sp. strain TB-90 urease gene complex in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 1762432- 442. ‘ Hu, L. T., and H. L. T. Mobley. 1990. Purification and N-terminal analysis of urease from Helicobacter pylori. Infect. Immun. 58:992-998. Yamazaki, E., T. Kurasawa, 8. Kakimoto, and I., Nakatsui. 1990. Characteristics of acid urease from Streptociccus mitior. Agric. Biol. Chem. 54:2433-2435. Mulrooney, S. B., and R. P. Hausinger. 1990. Sequence of the Klebsiella aerogenes urease genes and evidence for accessory proteins facilitating nickel incorporation. J. Bacteriol. 172:5837-5843. Mdrsdorf, G., and H. Kaltwasser. 1990. Cloning of the genes encoding urease from Proteus vulgaris and sequencing of the structural genes. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 66:67-74. Blanchard, A. 1990. Ureaplasma ureolyticum urease genes: use of a UGA tryptophan codon. Mol. Microbiol. 4:669—676. Labigne, A., V. Cussac, and P. Courcous. 1991. Shuttle cloning and nucleotide sequences of Helicobacter pylori genes responsible for urease activity. J. Bacteriol. 173:1920-1931. Skumik, M., 8. Batsford, A. Mertz, E. Schiltz, and P. Toivanen. 1993. The putative arthritogenic cationic 19-kilodalton antigen of Yersinia enterocolitica is a urease ji-subunit. Infect. Immun. 61 :2498-2504. Miksch, G., W. Arnold, P. Lentzsch, U. B. Priefer, and A. Pilhler. 1994. A 4.6 kb DNA region of Rhizobium meliloti involved in determining urease and hydrogenase activities carries the structural genes for urease (ureaA, ureB, ureC) interrupted by other open reading frames. Mol. Gen. Genet. 242:539-550. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 55. 20 Ferrero, R. L. and A. Labigne. 1993. Cloning, expression and sequencing of Helicobacter felis urease genes. Mol. Microbiol. 9:323- 333. Moersdorf, G., P. Weinmann, and H. Kaltwasser. GenBank X78411. Jose, J., U. -K. Schafer, and H. Kaltwasser. 1994. Threonine is present instead of cysteine at the active site of urease from Staphylococcus xylosus. Arch. Microbiol. 161:384-392. Suzuki, K., M. Takahashi, S. lmamura, and T. lshikawa. GenBank 010605. Riddles, P. W., V. Whan, R. L. Blakeley, and B. Zemer. 1991. Cloning and Sequencing of jack bean urease-encoding cDNA, Gene 1082265- 267. Takishima, K., T. Suga, and G. Mamiya. 1983. The structure of jack bean urease. The complete amino acid sequence, limited proteolysis and reactive cysteine residues. Eur. J. Biochem. 175:151-165. Hausinger, R. P. 1987. Nickel utilization by microorganisms. Microbiol. Rev. 51:22-42. Lee, M. H., S. B. Mulrooney, and R. P. Hausinger. 1990. Purification, characterization, and in vivo reconstitution of Klebsiella aerogenes urease apoenzyme. J. Bacteriol. 172:4427-4431. Todd, M. J., and R. P. Hausinger. 1989. Competitive inhibitors of Klebsiella aerogenes urease: mechanisms of interaction with the nickel active site. J. Biol. Chem. 264:15835-15842. Dixon, N. E., C. Gazzola, R. L. Blakeley, and B. Zemer. 1975. Inhibition of jack bean urease (EC 3.5.1.5) by acetohydroxamic acid and by phosphoramidate. An equivalent weight for urease. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 97:4130-4131. Dixon, N. E., R. L. Blakeley and B. Zemer. 1980. Jack bean urease (EC 3.5.1.5). Ill. The involvement of active site nickel ion in inhibition of B-mercaptoethanol, phosphoramidate, and fluoride. Can. J. Biochem. 58:481-488. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 65. 66. 21 Alagna, L., 8. S. Hasnain, B. Piggott, and D. J. Williams. 1984. The nickel ion environment in jack bean urease. Biochem. J. 220:591-595. Clark, P. K., D. E. Wilcox, and R. A. Scott. 1990. X-ray absorption spectroscopic evidence for binding of the competitive inhibitor 2-mercaptoethanol to the nickel sites of jack bean urease. A new Ni-Ni interaction in the inhibited enzyme. Inorg. Chem. 29:579-581. Hasnain, S. 8., and B. Piggott. 1983. An EXAFS study of jack bean urease, a nickel metalloenzyme. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 112:279-283. Sakaguchi, K., K. Mitsui, K. Kobashi, and J. Hase. 1983. Photo- oxidation of jack bean urease in the presence of methylene blue. J. Biochem. 93:681-686. Park, l.-S. and RP. Hausinger. 1993. Site-directed mutagenesis of Klebsiella aerogenes urease: identification of histidine residues that appear to function in nickel ligation, substrate binding, and catalysis. Protein Sci., 2:1034-1041. Park, I. -S., and R. P. Hausinger. 1993. Diethylpyrocarbonate reactivity of Klebsiella aerogenes urease: effect of pH and active-site ligands on rate of enzyme inactivation. J. Prot. Chem.12:51-56. Todd, M. J., and R. P. Hausinger. 1991. Reactivity of the essential thiol of Klebsiella aerogenes urease. Effect of pH and ligands on thiol modification. J. Biol. Chem. 266:10260-10267. Todd, M. J., and R. P. Hausinger. 1991. Identification of essential cysteine residue in Klebsiella aerogenes urease. J. Biol. Chem. 266:24327-24331 . Martin P. R., and R. P. Hausinger. 1992. Site-directed mutagenesis of the active site cysteine in Klebsiella aerogenes urease. J. Biol. Chem. 267:20024-20027. Dixon, N. E., P. W. Riddles, C. Gazzola, R. L. Blakeley, and B. Zemer. 1980. Jack bean urease (EC 3.5.1.5). V. On the mechanism of action of urease on urea, formamide, acetamide, N-methylurea, and related compounds. Can. J. Biochem. 58:1335-1344. Mulrooney, S. B., H. S. Pankratz, and R. P. Hausinger. 1989. Regulation of gene expression and cellular localization of cloned 67. 68. 69. 70. 71. 72. 73. 74. 75. 76. 77. 22 Klebsiella aerogenes (K. pneumoniae) urease. J. Gen. Microbiol. 135:1769-1776. Winkler, R. G., J. C. Polacco, D. L. Eskew, and R. M. Welch. 1983. Nickel is not required for apourease synthesis in soybean seeds. Plant Physiol. 72:262-263. Rando, D., U. Steglitz, G. Mdrsdorf, and H. Kaltwasser. 1991. Nickel availability and urease expression in Proteus mirabilis. Arch. Microbiol. 154:428-432. Bast, E. 1988. Nickel requirement for the formation of active urease in purple sulfur bacteria (Chromatiaceae). Arch. Microbiol. 150:6-10. Mackerras, A. H., and G. D. Smith. 1986. Urease activity of the cyanobacterium Anabaena cylindrica. J. Gen. Microbiol. 132:2749- 2752. Rees, T. A. V., and I. A. Bekheet. 1982. The role of nickel in urea assimilation by algae. Planta 156:385-387. Lee, M. H., S. B. Mulrooney, M. J. Renner, Y. Markowicz, and R. P. Hausinger. 1992. Klebsiella aerogenes urease gene cluster: sequence of ureD and demonstration that four accessory genes (ureD, ureE, ureF, and ureG) are involved in nickel metallocenter biosynthesis. J. Bacteriol. 174:4324-4330. Jones, B. D., and H. L. T. Mobley. 1989. Proteus mirabilis urease: nucleotide sequence determination and comparison with jack bean urease. J. Bacteriol. 171:6414-6422. Sriwanthan, B., M. D. Island, and H. I..T. Mobley. 1993. Sequence of the Proteus mirabilis urease accessory gene ureG. Gene 129:103-106. Collins, C. M., and D. M. Gutman. 1992. lnsertional inactivation of an Escherichia coli urease gene by IS3411. J. Bacteriol. 174:883-888. Cussac, V., R. I. Ferrero, and A. Labigne. 1992. Expression of Helicobacter pylori urease genes in Escherichia coli grown under nitrogen-limiting conditions. J. Bacteriol. 174:2466-2473. Lee, M.H., H. S. Pankratz, S. Wang, R.A. Scott, M.G. Finnegan, M.K. Johnson, J.A. lppolito, D.W. Christianson, and R.P. Hausinger. 78. 79. 80. 81. 82. 83. 84. 85. 86. 87. 23 1993. Purification and characterization of Klebsiella aerogenes UreE protein: A nickel binding protein that functions in urease metallocenter assembly. Protein Sci. 221042-1052. Saraste, M., P.T. Sibbald and A. Wittinghofer. 1990. The P-Ioop: A common motif in ATP- and GTP-binding proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 15:430-434. Hartman, F. C. and M. R. Harpel. 1994. Structure, function, regulation, and assembly of D-ribulose—1,5-bisphosphate carboxylaseloxygenase. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 63:197-234. Park, I. -S., M. B. Carr, and R. P. Hausinger. 1994. In vitro activation of urease apoprotein and role of UreD as a chaperone required for nickel metallocenter assembly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91:3233-3237. Kinghom, J. E., and R. Fluri. 1984. Genetic studies of purine breakdown in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Curr. Genet. 8:99-105. Mackay, E. M., and J. A. Pateman. 1980. Nickel requirement of a urease-deficient mutant in Aspergillus nidulans. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1 1 6:249-251. Mackay, E. M., and J. A. Pateman. 1982. The regulation of urease activity in Aspergillus nidulans. Genet. 20:763-776. Holland, M. A., J. D. Griffin, L. E. Meyer-Bothling, and J. C. Polacco. 1987. Developmental genetics of the soybean urease isozymes. Dev. Genet. 8:375-387. Meyer-Bothling, L. E., and J. C. Polacco. 1987. Mutational analysis of the embryo-specific urease locus of soybean. Mol. Gen. Genet. 209:439-444. Polacco, J. C., and E. A. Havir. 1979. Comparison of soybean urease isolated from seed and tissue culture. J. Biol. Chem. 254:1707-1715. Krueger, R. W., M. A. Holland, D. Chisholm, and J. C. Polacco. 1987. Recovery of a soybean urease genomic clone by sequential library screening with two synthetic oligodeoxynucleotides. Gene 54:41-50. 88. 89. 90. 24 Polacco, J. C., A. K. Judd, J. K. Dybing, and S. R. Cianzio. 1989. A new mutant class of soybean lacks urease in leaves but not leaf-derived callus or in roots. Mol. Gen. Genet. 217:257-262. Meyer-Bothling, L. E., J. C. Polacco, and S. R. Cianzio. 1987. Pleiotropic soybean mutants defective in both urease isozymes. Molec. Gen. Genet. 209:432-438. Benson, E. W., and H. B. Howe, Jr. 1978. Reversion and interallelic complementation at four urease loci in Neurospora crassa. Molec. Gen. Genet. 165:277-282. CHAPTER 2 Diethylpyrocarbonate Reactivity of Klebsiella aerogenes Urease: Effect of pH and Active Site Ligands on the Rate of Inactivation These studies were published in J. Protein Chem. 12, 51 -56, 1993. 25 26 ABSTRACT Reaction of Klebsiella aerogenes urease with diethylpyrocarbonate (DEP) led to a pseudo-first-order loss of enzyme activity by a reaction that exhibited saturation kinetics. The rate of urease inactivation by DEP decreased in the presence of active site ligands (urea, phosphate, and boric acid), consistent with the essential reactive residue being located proximal to the catalytic center. The pH dependence for the rate of inactivation indicated that the reactive residue possessed a pKa of 6.5, identical to that of a group that must be deprotonated for catalysis. Full activity was restored when the inactivated enzyme was treated with hydroxylamine, compatible with histidinyl or tyrosinyl reactivity. Spectrophotometric studies were consistent with DEP derivatization of 12 mol of histidine/mol of native enzyme. In the presence of active site ligands, however, approximately 4 mol of histidine/mol of protein were protected from reaction. Each protein molecule is known to possess two catalytic units; hence, I propose that urease possesses at least one essential histidine per catalytic unit. 27 INTRODUCTION Urease is a nickel-containing enzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of urea to form ammonia and carbamate; the carbamate spontaneously decomposes to form a second molecule of ammonia and carbonic acid (Andrews et al., 1988; Mobley and Hausinger, 1989). The best studied bacterial urease is that from Klebsiella aerogenes: the native enzyme consists of three subunits (M = 60,304, 11,695, 11,086; Mulrooney and Hausinger, 1990) in apparent 098474 stoichiometry and contains two active sites, each of which possesses two tightly bound nickel ions (Todd and Hausinger, 1989). In addition to the requisite bi-Ni metallocenter, an essential cysteine residue has been suggested to be located proximal to the K. aerogenes active site (Todd and Hausinger, 1991a). The pH dependence of urease inactivation by disulfide and alkylating agents is consistent with a single essential thiol interacting with a second ionizable residue together yielding macroscopic pKa values of <5 and 12. Active site labeling studies have identified the cysteine as residue 319 in the large subunit (Todd and Hausinger, 1991b), but the identity of the second ionizable residue is unknown. The pH dependence of urease catalysis is compatible with the presence of two additional ionizable groups participating in the hydrolytic reaction (Todd and Hausinger, 1987); one group (pKa a 6.55) must be deprotonated and a second group (pKa a 8.85) must be protonated for catalysis. Although the identity of these catalytic residues is unknown, histidine is a reasonable possibility for the group of lower pKa. Furthermore, in a study comparing properties of urease holoenzyme and apoprotein Lee et al. (1990) noted that urease was inactivated by diethylpyrocarbonate (DEP). This result is also consistent with the presence of an essential histidine residue. Here, I follow up this observation to more carefully detail the DEP reactivity of urease and assess whether a histidine residue may be present at the active site. 28 MATERIALS AND METHODS Materials. DEP, obtained from Sigma Chemical Co., was dissolved in ethanol immediately before use. DEP concentration was measured by reacting an aliquot with 10 mM imidazole (pH 7.0) and monitoring the absorbance at 230 nm using an extinction coefficient of 3,000 M'1cm'1 (Miles, 1977). Enzyme Purification. Urease was purified to a specific activity of >2500 units/mg from K. aerogenes carrying plasmid pKAU19 (Mulrooney et al., 1989) by procedures described previously (Todd and Hausinger, 1989). One unit of enzyme activity is defined as the amount of enzyme required to degrade 1 umol of urea per min in the standard assay mixture which contained 50 mM urea, 0.5 mM EDTA, and 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.75, at 37°C. Linear regression analysis of the released ammonia, determined by conversion to indophenol, versus time yielded the initial rates. Protein was assayed by the method of Lowry et al. (1951) Kinetics of Urease Inactivation. Inactivation reactions contained 0.5 mM EDTA, 80 mM HEPES, pH 7.0 buffer (or other buffers and pH values as indicated for the pH dependence studies) plus the indicated concentrations of reagent and inhibitor (if present). All reactions were performed at 37°C. Aliquots were removed at the indicated time points and diluted 200-fold into assay buffer. The stability of DEP in the various enzyme inactivation buffers was assessed in control experiments, and enzyme inactivation reactions were carried out over a sufficiently short period of time to minimize concerns over DEP hydrolysis. Spectroscopy. All spectra were obtained by using a Gilford Response spectrophotometer. Spectral data were transferred to an IBM PC for calculation of difference spectra. 29 Recovery of Enzyme Activity by NHZOH Treatment. Urease (140 nM) was inactivated with DEP (50 pM) for 1 min in 0.5 mM EDTA, 80 mM HEPES, pH 7.0 at 37°C. Excess DEP was reacted with imidazole (final concentration of 0.5 mM), and hydroxylamine was added to a concentration of 0.5 mM. The enzyme mixture was incubated at 37°C and aliquots were assayed for recovery of activity. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Inactivation of Urease by DEP. The effect of DEP concentration on urease inactivation at pH 7 is shown in Figure 1. At each inhibitor concentration, a pseudo-first-order loss of activity was observed; i.e., In VtNo (where Vt is the velocity at time t and V0 is the initial velocity) is linear with time until less than 5% of the starting activity remains. Analogous studies were carried out at pH 6, and the observed rate constants for both experiments were plotted versus DEP concentration to yield the lines shown in Figure 2. At pH 6, high concentrations of DEP clearly demonstrated partial saturation of the inactivation rate. Saturation kinetics is expected for a reagent which reacts as illustrated in Scheme 1. g k . . E+ l ‘— El -1-> inactive enzyme Scheme 1 For inactivators which follow this scheme (where k1 is much slower that the rate of El dissociation), the apparent rate of urease inactivation (kapp) obeys Equation 1. 30 O \\. I I i -1 — \I ' . . — ’5 -2 — ‘ - - é. ’ . . .>, , . 5 '3 L . fl 9 o ‘ <> -4 - o O _5 1 I I 1 1 I 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 Time (min) Figure. 1. Pseudo-first-order urease activity loss in the presence of DEP. The fraction of activity remaining is shown as a function of time for urease (140 nM) reacting with DEP at 5 (0), 10 (O), 20 (V), 30 (V), 40 (U), 50 (I), 60 (A), 70 (A) 80 (0), and 100 (9) (AM. All reactions were in 0.5 mM EDTA, 80 mM HEPES buffer at pH 7.0 and 37°C. 31 L l l 4 J 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 DEP (,uM) Figure. 2. Effect of DEP concentration on pseudo-first-order rate of inactivation. The pseudo-first order rate constants calculated from Figure. 1 (e) and analogous constants determined at pH 6.0 (0) were plotted as a function of DEP concentration. 32 it,” = km (1) [11+K. At pH 6, Kd and k1 were estimated to be 327 1 36 uM and 8.3 1 0.6 min-1, yielding a second-order rate constant (k1le) of 25,400 M‘1 min'1. Non- linearity in the pH 7.0 data suggest that saturation also occurs here, however, the extremely rapid inactivation rate precluded estimation of the individual constants. Nevertheless, a value of 60,000 1 2,000 M'1 min'1 was calculated for the second-order rate constant. These second-order rate constants surpass all other DEP-dependent second-order inactivation rates tabulated for diverse enzymes (Lundblad and Noyes, 1984), with the nearest similar rate being 10,380 M'1 min'1 at pH 7.2 for lactate dehydrogenase (Bloxham, 1981). Effect of Ligands on the Rate of Urease Inactivation by DEP. Ligands which bind to the active site of urease were examined for their effect on the rate of inactivation by DEP. At 40 uM DEP, increasing concentrations of both borate and phosphate (competitive inhibitors of urease) were found to reduce the rate of inactivation (Figure. 3). At elevated phosphate concentrations, kapp was less than 20% that of the control; whereas, saturating levels of borate decreased kapp only by approximately 40%. These results can be accomodated by the model shown in Scheme 2 (where the ligands are represented by L). E+ l Ké El £19 inactive enzyme + L II KL (XKd 2 EL+| v——‘ ELI -> inactive enzyme Scheme 2 33 12 // // 0 I I/[T T T T fl I// I 1.0 0.8F 0.6 F 0.4 - 0.2 - an M65 0.0 1 1 7/// 1 1 1 1 1 1//// 1 0.0 0.2 0.4 4.06.0 8111 4 8 12 200 300 400 kapp (fraction of control) Boric acid (mM) Phosphate (mM) Figure. 3. Effect of competitive inhibitors on the rate of urease inactivation by DEP. The second-order rate constants for urease inactivation by DEP (40 pM) at pH 7.0 were determined in the presence of boric acid (panel A) or phosphate (panel B) at the indicated concentrations. The values shown are expressed as fraction of the inactivation rate in the absence of inhibitors. 34 . The rate of inactivation for a reaction that follows Scheme 2 is shown in Equation 2 (Carrillo et al., 1981 ). = (k,KLaK, + k,iLiK.)iIi + K [WK ‘“’ aK.K. 0.4 0.2 A 0.0 Q. E 0.08- "an... «6 U N o (D R’. 006 °' 5:3: § ' ‘4 3 - 22 g 0.04 ‘ .. ‘ ‘ . . ‘ :1: a A A A A A ‘ ‘ (2 “5 3 0.02- =14: < 0.00 1 1 1 1 1 O 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 Time (min) Figure. 8. Kinetic comparison of activity and absorbance changes during modification by DEP. Urease (4.2 uM) was incubated with DEP (100 nM) in 25 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7.0 at 25°C in the absence (0) or presence (0) of 400 mM phosphate. Changes in activity (A) and absorbance at 242 nm (8) were monitored, and differences between the phosphate-free and phosphate- containing samples were calculated (A). 42 REFERENCES Andrews, R. K., Blakeley, R. L., and Zemer, B. (1988). In The Biainorganic Chemistry of Nickel (Lancaster, J. R., ed) pp. 141 -165, VCH Publishers, Inc., New York. Bloxham, D. P. (1981). Biochem. J. 193, 93-97. Carrillo, N., Arana, J. L., and Vallejos, R. H. (1981). J. Biol. Chem. 256, 6823- 6828. Lee, M. H., Mulrooney, S. B., and Hausinger, R. P. (1990). J. Bacterial. 172, 4427-4431. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. J. (1951). J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265-275. Lundblad, R. L.,and Noyes, C. M. (1984). Chemical reagents for protein modification, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 105-125. Miles, E. W. (1977). Math. Enzymol. 47, 431-442. Mobley, H. L. T., and Hausinger, R. P. (1989). Microbiol. Rev. 53, 85-108. Mulhrad, A., Hegyi, G., and Toth, G. (1967). Acta Biochim. Biophys. Acad. Sci. Hung. 2, 19-29. Mulrooney, S. B., and Hausinger, R. P. (1990). J. Bacterial. 172, 5837-5843. Mulrooney, 8. B., Pankratz, H. 8., and Hausinger, R. P. (1989). J. Gen. Microbial. 135, 1769-1776. Todd, M. J., and Hausinger, R. P. (1987). J. Biol. Chem. 262,5963-5967. Todd, M. J., and Hausinger, R. P. (1989). J. Biol. Chem. 264, 15835-15842. Todd, M. J., and Hausinger, R. P. (1991 a). J. Biol. Chem. 266, 10260-10267. Todd, M. J., and Hausinger, R. P. (1991b). J. Biol. Chem. 266, 24327-24331. CHAPTER 3 Site-directed mutagenesis of Klebsiella aerogenes urease: Identification of histidine residues that appear to function in nickel ligation, substrate binding, and catalysis These studies were published in Protein Science 21034-1041, 1993. 43 44 ABSTRACT Comparison of six urease sequences revealed the presence of ten conserved histidine residues (H96 in the 7 subunit, H39 and H41 in [3, and H134, H136, H219, H246, H312, H320 and H321 in the ct subunit of the Klebsiella aerogenes enzyme). Each of these residues in K. aerogenes urease was substituted with alanine by site-directed mutagenesis and the mutant proteins were purified and characterized in order to identify essential histidine residues and assign their roles. The yH96A, BH39A, BH41A, otH312A and 0t H321A mutant proteins possess activities and nickel contents similar to wild- type enzyme, suggesting that these residues are not essential for substrate binding, catalysis, or metal binding. In contrast, the otH134A, 0tH136A and 0t H246A proteins exhibit no detectable activity and possess 53%, 6%, and 21% of the nickel content of wild-type enzyme. These results are consistent with aH134, 0tH136 and 01H246 functioning as nickel ligands. The otH219A protein is active and has nickel (~1.9% and ~80%, respectively, when compared to wild-type protein), but exhibits a very high Km value (1100:40 mM compared to 23:02 mM for the wild-type enzyme). These results are compatible with 0tH219 having some role in facilitating substrate binding. Finally, the aH320A protein (Km=8.3:0.2 mM) only displays ~0.003% of the wild-type enzyme activity, despite having a normal nickel content. Unlike the wild-type and 0tH219A ureases this mutant protein was not inactivated by diethylpyrocarbonate (DEP), consistent with 0tH320 being the DEP-reactive general base that facilitates catalysis. 45 INTRODUCTION Urease (EC 3.5.1.5), found in a variety of plants and a broad range of bacterial species, is a nickel-containing enzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of urea to form carbonic acid and two molecules of ammonia (Mobley 8. Hausinger, 1989). The best studied microbial urease is that from the enteric bacterium, Klebsiella aerogenes. The enzyme is comprised of three subunits [Mrs=60,304 (a), 11,695 (B), and 11,086 (7) (Mulrooney & Hausinger, 1990)] and possesses two nickel ions per 043272 catalytic unit (Todd & Hausinger, 1987, 1989). Although K. aerogenes urease has been crystallized and the crystals shown to diffract to less than 2 A (Jabri et al., 1992), the three-dimensional structure of the enzyme has not yet been elucidated. Nevertheless, several structural features of the bacterial urease active site have been characterized and multiple essential roles for histidine residues have been implicated. For example, the pH dependence of enzyme activity is consistent with the presence of two chemical groups at the active site that participate in catalysis as a general base (pKa=6.55) and a general acid (pKa=8.85) (Todd & Hausinger, 1987). Chemical modification studies with the histidine-selective reagent DEP were compatible with a histidine residue serving as the general base (Park & Hausinger, 1993). Additional chemical modification and site-directed mutagenesis studies demonstrated the presence of an active site cysteine residue (C319 in the ct subunit) in the K. aerogenes enzyme (Todd & Hausinger, 1991 b; Martin & Hausinger, 1992). The pH dependence of urease inactivation by disulfide and alkylating reagents (Todd & Hausinger, 1991 a) and the shift in pH optimum observed for C319A, C3198, _ and C319D mutant proteins compared to wild-type enzyme (Martin & Hausinger, 1992) were interpreted in terms of the cysteine residue ionically interacting with a second residue (X), together acting as a proton donor during catalysis. 46 Although the identity of X is unknown, the pH-dependent behavior of urease inactivation by thiol-specific chemical reagents is reminiscent of studies involving papain where a Cys-His ion pair has been characterized (Brocklehurst, 1987). Finally, Lee et al. (1990) compared the chemical reactivity of K. aerogenes holoenzyme and apoprotein toward DEP and found that more histidines are accessible to the reagent in the nickel-free protein. The enhanced DEP-reactivity of apoprotein is consistent with histidine residues participating as nickel metallocenter ligands in urease. This study combines site-directed mutagenesis and enzyme characterization methods to identify several essential histidine residues in K. aerogenes urease and to define their roles. Comparison of the urease amino acid sequences from jack bean (Takishima et al, 1988), Helicobacter pylori (Clayton et al., 1990; Labigne et al., 1991), Ureaplasma urea/yticum (Blanchard, 1990), Proteus vulgaris (Morsdorf & Kaltwasser, 1990), Proteus mirabilis (Jones 8 Mobley, 1989) and K. aerogenes (Mulrooney & Hausinger, 1990) revealed the presence of ten conserved histidines: H96 in the y subunit, H39 and H41 in B, and H134, H136, H219, H246, H312, H320 and H321 in the ct subunit of the K. aerogenes enzyme. I substituted each of the conserved histidine residues in the K. aerogenes enzyme with alanine (a residue that contains a side chain which can not function as a metallocenter ligand or general base or general acid, can not participate in hydrogen bond interactions, and is smaller than the wild-type residue so that it will not cause steric disruption of the structure), purified the mutant proteins, and characterized their enzyme activities, nickel contents, and reactivities with DEP and iodoacetamide (IAM). The results suggest that histidine residues in the ct subunit may play key roles with H134, H136, and H246 participating in the ligation of nickel, H219 facilitating the binding of substrate, and H320 acting as a general base in catalysis. 47 MATERIALS AND METHODS Materials. DEP, obtained from Sigma Chemical Co., was dissolved in ethanol immediately before use. DEP concentration was measured by reacting an aliquot with 10 mM imidazole (pH 7.0) and monitoring the absorbance at 230 nm using an extinction coefficient of 3,000 M‘Icm‘1 (Miles, 1977). IAM (Aldrich Chemical Co.) was prepared in distilled water. Site-directed mutagenesis. For yH96A, BH39A and BH41A, a 1.4-kbp SacI-Smal fragment of the pKAU17 (Mulrooney et al., 1989) was subcloned into M13 mp18, and mutagenized by the method of Kunkel et al. (1983). For 0t H134A, otH136A, aH219A, aH246A, aH312A, otH320A and 0tH321A, a 1.1-kbp BamH1-Sall fragment of the same plasmid was used. Uracil-containing, single- stranded template DNA was prepared from E. coli CJ236 (dut1 ung1 thi-1 relA1/pCJ105[camr F']). Mutagenized phage were isolated in E. coli MV1193 (A [lacI-praAB] rpsL thi endA spcB15 hst4 A[er-recA]306::Tn10[teI‘] F'[traD36 praAB+ lac/QIaCZAM15]). The following oligonucleotides were synthesized by using an Applied Biosystems Model 394 DNA synthesizer at the Michigan State University Macromolecular Structural Facility: AATCGGGTTGGCAACGGTGAC, GAAATGGTAGGCCGAACCGAC, CTCGGCGAAAGCGTAGTGCG, CTGAAGATCGCTGAGGACTGG, GGTCGCCCTGGCCAGCGACACC, GGATCGATACCGCTATTCACTG, ACCCATATTGCCTGGATCTGT, CCATCGATGAAGCTCTCGATATG, ATGGTCTGCGCCCATCTGGAC, GTCTGCCACGCTCTGGACCCG. These primers were used to alter the ten conserved histidine codons to encode alanine at each position. Site-directed mutants were identified by DNA sequencing, and subcloned back into pKAU17 48 on a 1.1-kbp SacI-Mlul fragment for yH96A, BH39A, and BH41A and a 0.8-kbp MluI-Bsml fragment for the other mutations. These regions were completely sequenced by using Sequenase 2.0 (United States Biochemicals) and the single-strand DNA method of Sanger et al. (1977) to ensure that no other mutations had been introduced into M13. In one case, sequence analysis demonstrated that a recombination event had occurred and an alternate clone that possessed the desired muation was chosen for further studies. After subcloning, the mutated sequences were again confirmed by double-strand DNA sequencing methods (Sambrook et al., 1989). Enzyme purification. Ureases were purified from E. coli DH5 carrying pKAU17 or the site-directed mutants of pKAU17 by procedures described previously (Todd & Hausinger, 1989), except that cells were grown in LB medium containing 1 mM NiCI2. As noted by Lee et al. (1992) and Martin and Hausinger (1992), the wild-type enzyme isolated from cells grown under these conditions does not exhibit the maximum specific activity observed for enzyme isolated from K. aerogenes [pKAU19] cells (2,500 units mg‘1, Todd & Hausinger, 1989). This decreased activity does not result from a difference in nickel content, but rather may be related to problems arising from the high levels of urease biosynthesis or to unknown host-dependent effects (Lee et al, 1992). Because urease synthesis in cells containing the mutated plasmids is similar to that in cells producing wild-type enzyme, it is reasonable to directly compare their relative specific activities and nickel contents. Purification of inactive mutant proteins (aH134A, aH136A, a219A, aH246A, and otH320A) was monitored for urease-containing fractions by sodium dodecyl sulfate- polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis using 10-15% polyacrylamide gradient gels and the buffers described by Laemmli (1970). Sample purities were determined 49 by using a gel scanner (AMBIS Inc.) and the measured values were used for correction of enzyme activities and nickel contents. Assay of enzyme activity. The urease activities for wild-type and mutant proteins except otH219A and aH320A were assayed in 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.75, 0.5 mM EDTA, and 50 mM urea. The aH219A protein activity routinely was measured by using 1 M urea; however, for monitoring activity loss during thermal stability and chemical modification studies a Concentration of 100 mM urea was used. The aH320A activity was assayed in 25 mM HEPES, pH 6.75 buffer containing 0.5 mM EDTA and 50 mM urea. One unit of enzyme activity is defined as the amount of enzyme required to degrade 1 mol of urea per min at 37°C. Linear regression analysis of the released ammonia, determined by conversion to indophenol (Weatherbum, 1967), versus time yielded the initial rates. Calculation of kinetic constants made use of the method of Wilkinson (1961 ). Protein was assayed by the method of Lowry et al. (1951 ). Nickel quantitation. The nickel content of purified urease was assayed by using a computer-controlled Varian Spectra AA-400Z graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrophotometer with Zeeman background correction as previously described (Lee et al., 1992). For calculation of the number of nickel ions per catalytic unit, a M of 105,866 for the 043sz unit was used. Thermal stability. Cell extracts containing wild-type and mutant urease proteins were incubated in 20 mM phosphate, pH 7.0 buffer containing 1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM B-mercaptoethanol at 50°C, 60°C, and 70°C. At the indicated times, aliquots were removed and the remaining activities were assayed. 50 Inactivation by DEP. Inactivation reactions were performed at 37°C in 1 mM EDTA, 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.0 buffer (or other buffers and pH values as described) plus the indicated concentrations of DEP. For wild-type and 0tH219A proteins, aliquots were removed at the indicated time points and diluted at least 100-fold into assay buffer. For the otH320A protein, aliquots (100 til) were quenched with imidazole (final concentration of 5 mM) and incubated for 5 min on ice prior to measuring enzyme activity. The stability of DEP in the various enzyme inactivation buffers was assessed in control experiments, and enzyme inactivation reactions were carried out over a sufficiently short period of time to minimize concerns over DEP hydrolysis. The pKa values for inactivation of wild- type and aH219A proteins were calculated by fitting data sets to the following equation (Cousineau & Meighen, 1976) by using linear-least-squares methods: 1=1+[H*] kapp (kapp )max (kapp )max Ks Inactivation by IAM. Purified urease was incubated in 1 mM EDTA, 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.75 buffer (or other buffers and pH values as described) plus the indicated concentrations of IAM at 37°C. Aliquots were taken at 30-min intervals and assayed for urease activity as previously described (Todd & Hausinger, 1991 a). RESULTS Initial characterization of mutant proteins. Escherichia coli cells containing the K. aerogenes urease genes on plasmid pKAU17 or derivative 51 plasmids with His—>Ala substitutions were grown under culture conditions that led to high level synthesis of the wild-type and mutant ureases. The wild-type and mutant proteins were highly purified (Figure 1) and the specific activities, Km values, and nickel contents were determined (Table 1). The yH96A, BH39A, BH41A, 0tH312A and 0tH321A proteins have Km values, specific activities, and nickel contents that are similar to the wild-type enzyme, indicating that these histidine residues are not likely to be important for substrate binding, catalysis, or nickel ligation. In contrast, the other five mutant proteins exhibit significant changes in their properties, consistent with important roles for the aH134, 0: H136, aH219, otH246, and otH320 residues. These mutant proteins fall into three classes, each of which is described separately below. The 0tH134A, 0tH136A and aH246A proteins are inactive and possess approximately 50% of the normal metal content (aH134A) or the near absence of nickel (aH136A and aH246A). These results are compatible with aH134, aH136 and aH246 functioning as nickel ligands in the enzyme. It remains unclear whether the latter two residues may bridge the two metal atoms at the active site so that neither nickel can bind in the absence of these double ligands, or if the increased lability of one active site nickel atom by loss of a ligand leads to lability of the second metal ion. Similarly, it is unknown whether the 50% nickel content of the 0tH134A protein represents a case where one nickel is incorporated into each catalytic unit randomly between the two nickel sites or whether one of the two nickel sites is filled while the other remains unoccupied due to the loss of an essential ligand. The otH219A protein exhibits a very high Km value for urea coupled with a large decrease in specific activity (although the enzyme activity could not be assayed under saturating conditions, the calculated Vmax value was about 3% of that found in the wild-type protein). The altered properties of the aH219A protein apparently are not due to changes in nickel content because, at most, 20% of the nickel was lost in this mutant protein compared to wild-type enzyme. 52 1234 56 789101112 * ' L" 5.00.09...- ‘hff - Figure. 1. Denaturing gel electrophoretic analysis of partially purified urease proteins. Samples were run on a 10-15% polyacrylamide gradient gel and stained with Coomassie brilliant blue. The percent purity for each sample was assessed by using an AMBIS gel scanner. Lane 1: molecular weight markers (phosphorylase b, M, of 92,500; bovine serum albumine, M, of 66,200; ovalumin, M, of 45,000; carbonic anhydrase, M, of 31,000; soybean trypsin inhibitor, M, of 21 ,500; and lysozyme, M, of 14,400). The protein designations and percent purities for the samples are indicated for lane 2: yH96A (72%), lane 3: BH39A (96%), lane 4: B H41A (90%), lane 5: 0tH134A (70%), lane 6: aH136A (80%), lane 7: 0tH219A (93%). lane 8: aH246A (52%), lane 9: aH312A (>98%), lane 10: aH320A (>98%), lane 11: 0tH321A (98%), and lane 12: Wild-type (88%). 53 Table 1. Characteristics of wild-type and mutant Klebsiella aerogenes ureasesa Km Specific activity Nickel content Urease (mM) (U/mg) (%) (tit/catalytic unit) (%) Wild-type 23:02 1900 100 2.1 100 yH96A 19:02 1700 90 2 95 BH39A 1.5102 1500 - 79 2.1 100 8H41A 14:02 1300 68 2.5 120 aH‘I34A - <0001 - 1.1 53 0H136A - <0001 - 0.13 5 0H219A 1 1001-4019 3512.0 1.9 1.7 80 01H246A - <0001 - 0.44 21 aH312A 16:02 1800 95 2.2 105 cH320A 8.3:0.2d 0051‘»? 0.0027 2.3 110 0H321A 20:02 1700 90 2.4 114 a Determined for enzyme purified by DEAE-Sepharose and Mono-Q column chromatographies as illustrated in Fig. 1, except where indicated. b Determined by using enzyme purified only with DEAE-Sepharose column chromatography. . C Determined by using 1 M urea instead of the standard assay. d Determined for cell extract. 9 Determined by using pH 6.75 buffer instead of the normal 7.75 buffer. 54 Rather, the high Km value of the 0H219A protein suggests that the aH219 residue is somehow important to substrate binding. For example, the histidine residue may facilitate urea binding by forming a hydrogen-bond with the substrate. Alternatively, however, the results are compatible with a model in which the imidazole group simply props open the substrate binding site and maintains its accessibility. The otH320A protein was found to have a very significant decrease in specific activity and a moderate increase in Km value compared to wild-type enzyme. The observed kinetic changes were not correlated to the protein's nickel content, consistent with 0H320 having a role in urease activity other than in substrate binding or nickel ligation. Thermal stabilities of mutant ureases. Of those mutant ureases that possess activity, all but the 0H312A protein exhibited significant reductions in thermal stability compared to the wild-type enzyme (Table 2). These results are consistent with the yH96, BH41, BH39, aH219, aH320, and 0H321 residues participating in ion-pair or hydrogen-bond interactions in the native protein. Loss of these interactions leads to protein destabilization at temperatures 2 50°C but not at the growth temperature of 37°C. The reason for the enhanced stability of the 0H312A mutant protein over wild-type enzyme is unclear. pH dependence of mutant urease activities. The pH optimum of the wild-type enzyme (Figure 2A) at around pH 7.75 is retained in the active mutant proteins yH96A, BH39A, BH41A, aH219A, 0H312A, and 0H321A, as illustrated for the 0H219A protein (Figure 28). The results are consistent with the wild-type general base and general acid groups being retained in these mutant proteins. In contrast, the 0H320A protein exhibited a significantly shifted pH optimum at 55 Table 2. Thermal stabilites of wild-type and mutant ureasesa Incubafion 50°C 60°C 70°C Urease 1 hr 2 hr 1 hr 2 hr 1 hr 2 hr VVild-type 79 70 57 45 13 3 yH96A 74 61 33 12 <1 <1 BH39A 66 53 9 <1 <1 <1 BH41A 64 51 45 21 <1 <1 0tH219A° 83 72 43 18 <1 <1 0H312A 80 76 85 70 42 22 0H320A° 85 74 8 <2 <3 <3 0tH321A 65 58 30 12 <1 <1 a Values are expressed as percent of that for control samples that were not subjected to high temperature incubation. In each case, cell extracts were incubated in 20 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) containing 1 mM EDTA and 1 mM B-mercaptoethanal at the indicated temperatures for up to 2 hr and the activities were measured by using the standard assay conditions, except where indicated. b Activities for the 0H219A protein were measured by using a concentration of 100 mM urea. ‘3 Assays for the 0H320A protein were carried out at pH 6.75. 56 400 I l I A 300 - WT — O 200 - ' - A 100 - V 4 O E O I I I 51 B _ aH219A g 9 _ o 1 .3 5 - . V 4 it .9 3 " ‘ fig 0 I I I m C aH320A 0.002 - — 0.001 — - 0.000 4 8 8 10 12 Figure 2. The pH dependence of urease activity. Analysis using A: Cell extracts of E. coli DH5[pKAU17], B: Purified 0H219A enzyme, C: Cell extracts containing the 0H320A mutant protein. The reaction mixtures contained urea (50 mM for wild-type enzyme and H320A protein or 1 M for the 0H219A protein), 0.5 mM EDTA and the following buffers at a concentration of 25 mM: ME8(O), HEPES (O), CHES (V), and CAPS (V). 57 around 6.75 (Figure 2C). Hence, one of the residues serving as a general base or general acid may have been mutated in the 0H320A protein or the mutation may have indirectly shifted one of these pKa values. Inactivation of mutant ureases by DEP. The properties of the 0H219A and aH320A mutant proteins were consistent with these two histidine residues playing important roles in the enzyme other than metallocenter ligation. Because chemical modification studies of urease using DEP had provided evidence for an essential histidine residue acting as a general base in the native enzyme (Park & Hausinger, 1993), the DEP reactivities of these two mutant proteins were assessed. While the wild-type enzyme was rapidly inactivated by 50 11M DEP (Figure 3), both the aH219A and 0H320A proteins appeared to retain full enzyme activity after the same treatment (data not shown). At 1 mM DEP, however, the aH219A protein was inactivated in a pseudo-first-order process, whereas the 0H320A protein continued to be resistant to inactivation by DEP. Further characterization of DEP inactivation of the 0H219A protein demonstrated that the rate was pH-dependent (Figure 4) with the pattern for inactivation of the 0H219A (pKa=6.8) and wild-type (pKa=6.5) proteins being nearly identical. These data are inconsistent with 0H219 serving as the general base for catalysis in the wild-type enzyme. Rather, the reduced level of DEP reactivity observed for the aH219A protein may be due to the same features that account for the high Km value of this enzyme. The structure of DEP shares some similarity to that of urea, hence, the binding of this reagent to the active site correspondingly may be reduced in affinity. Alternatively, if aH219 is important for maintaining access to the catalytic site the reduced reactivity in the mutant protein may derive from partial closure of this region. In contrast to the DEP reactivity of the 0H219A protein, the resistance to inactivation by DEP 58 0.5 1 I r Ln vt/vo —2.0 ‘ 1 0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 Time (min) Figure 3. Kinetics of urease inactivation by DEP. Purified wild-type (0), 0t H219A (V), and aH320A (0) proteins were treated with DEP (50 11M, 1 mM, and 1 mM, respectively) in 1 mM EDTA and 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.0) buffer. The natural logarithm of Vt/Vo (where Vt is the velocity at time tand V0 is the initial velocity) is shown as a function of time. 59 1600 40 1200 4— -_ 30 ’3 s ’-.: 5 800 ~~ -- 20 g 5 e: .2 400 —~ -— 10 0 0 4 6 8 10 log kapp Figure 4. The pH dependence of DEP inactivation of wild-type and 0H219A ureases. A: Apparent second-order rate constants (M’1SBC'1) for urease inactivation with DEP (left axis for wild-type enzyme and right axis for the aH219A enzyme) are plotted as a function of pH. 8: The same data plotted as log kapp versus pH. The reactions were carried out in 1 mM EDTA and 50 mM concentrations of the following buffers: MES (O), MOPS (O), HEPES (A), Tricine (D) or TAPS (A) for wild-type and MOPS (I) for H219A urease. 60 displayed by the 0H320A protein is compatible with 0H320 serving as the target of DEP in the native enzyme; i.e., the general base that facilitates catalysis. Inactivation of mutant proteins by IAM. To further explore the roles of the 01H21 9 and 0H320 residues, the chemical reactivities of the mutant proteins towards IAM were assessed. This reagent had been used previously (Todd & Hausinger, 1991 a) to provide evidence that a thiol group is ionically coupled to another residue, X, together acting as the proton donor in catalysis. Both the a H219A and aH320A proteins were inactivated by incubation with IAM (Figure 5). A much higher concentration of the alkylating reagent is required for inactivation of the 0H219A urease than for wild-type enzyme or the 0H320A protein. Because IAM structurally resembles urea, part of this effect may arise from decreased affinity of the reagent for the active site (prior to reaction with the cysteine residue) due to the same features that lead to the high Km value in this protein. Again, however, the results are compatible with a model in which the active site is simply less accessible in the aH320A protein. The pH dependence of otH320A inactivation by IAM could not be examined because of the low activity of the protein. In contrast, the pH dependence for aH219A protein was measured and shown to be similar to that in the wild-type enzyme (Figure 6). This result would not be expected if the aH219 residue was equivalent to X in the Cys-X ion pair that has been proposed to occur in this protein (Todd & Hausinger, 1991 a). 61 _4 1 1 1 T 0 30 6O 90 120 Time (min) Figure 5. Kinetics of urease inactivation by IAM. Purified wild type (C), 0H219A (V), and aH320A (0) proteins were treated with 40 mM IAM and purified or H219A (V) protein was treated with 400 mM IAM in 1 mM EDTA and 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.75) buffer. The natural logarithm of thV0 (where Vt is the velocity at time tand V0 is the initial velocity) is shown as a function of time. 62 3 T I T I 2_ 00 _ 8 1- _ a. 8 o- - .14 m_1_ _ 2 1:1 A _2- I _ _3_ _ _4 1 1 1 1 4 6 8 10 12 14 pH Figure 6. The pH dependence of IAM inactivation of wild-type and aH219A ureases. Apparent second-order rate constants (M-1sec-1) for urease inactivation with IAM (20 mM for wild type enzyme and 120 mM for the aH219A enzyme) are plotted as a function of pH. The reactions were carried out either in 1 mM EDTA and 80 mM of acetate (1:1), MES (I), HEPES (A), CHES (A), CAPS (<>), and phosphate (0) buffers for wild-type enzyme or in 1 mM EDTA and 50 mM HEPES (O) and CHES (O) buffers for the 0H219A urease. 63 DISCUSSION Dixon et al. (1980) proposed an elegant model for the hydrolysis of urea by the bi-nickel active site of jack bean (Canavalia ensifarmis) urease that serves as an excellent framework for discussion of K. aerogenes urease site-directed mutagenesis. In their model, one nickel ion is suggested to coordinate a water molecule and a second nickel ion coordinates hydroxide ion. Urea is proposed to displace the water molecule and bind in O-coordination to nickel as the Ni--'O- C(-NH2)=NH2EB resonance structure with electrostatic stabilization by a nearby carboxyl group. A general base is hypothesized to activate the nickel- coordinated hydroxyl group that carries out a nucleophilic attack on the urea carbon. The resulting tetrahedral intermediate is thought to decompose to form carbamate and ammonia with the participation of a nearby thiol group acting as a general acid. Subsequently, carbamate dissociates and spontaneously is converted to carbon dioxide and a second molecule of ammonia. According to the Dixon model, two nickel ions, a carboxyl group, a general base and a general acid are required for the jack bean enzyme activity. In independent studies with jack bean urease, Sakaguchi et al. (1983) provided evidence from photo-oxidation studies of the enzyme in the presence of methylene blue and active site-directed inhibitors that histidine residues play essential roles at the catalytic site. Furthermore, Takishima et al. (1988) identified the reactive cysteine residue in the enzyme and found it to be located in a region that was rich in histidine residues. In studies with K. aerogenes urease, known to be ~60% identical in sequence to the jack bean enzyme (Mulrooney & Hausinger, 1990), the Dixon model has undergone further elaboration. The chemical reactivity of the general base (pKaES.5) that appears to facilitate catalysis (Todd & Hausinger, 1987) was 64 shown to be compatible with that of a histidyl group (Park & Hausinger, 1993). The thiol group that participates in proton donation was identified (Todd & Hausinger, 1991b; Martin & Hausinger, 1992) and shown to function as an ion pair with another residue (X) that could reasonably be accounted for by a histidine group (Todd & Hausinger, 1991 a). Finally, the enhanced DEP reactivity of apoprotein over holoenzyme (Lee et al., 1990) is consistent with at least partial metallocenter ligation by histidyl residues. The multiple potential roles for histidine groups in the protein led to'the experiments described above. My results are consistent with the participation of three histidyl residues (aH134, aH136, and otH246) in nickel coordination, one histidine residue (0 H320) serving as the general base in catalysis, and one residue (aH219) somehow facilitating substrate binding. The latter residue may stabilize urea binding by hydrogen—bond formation [similar to the ionic stabilization of bound urea by a postulated carboxyl group in the model of Dixon et al. (1980)], or perhaps 0H219 may act by maintaining accessibility to the catalytic site. No evidence was obtained for the presence of a conserved histidine acting as residue X in a Cys-X pair that functions as a general acid. Further efforts toward elucidating the three—dimensional structure of K. aerogenes urease by x-ray crystallographic methods (of, Jabri et al., 1992) will establish the validity of several of the roles for histidine residues that have been proposed here. 65 References Blanchard, A. (1990). Ureaplasma urea/yticum urease genes; use of a UGA tryptophan codon. Molec. Microbial. 4, 669-679. Brockelhurst, K (1987). Acyl group transfer-cysteine proteinases. In Enzyme Mechanisms (Page, M. l. 8 Williams, A., Eds), pp. 140-158. Royal Society of Chemistry, Burlington House, London. Clayton, C. L., Pallen, M. J., Kleanthous, J., Wren, B. W. & Tabaqchali, S. (1990). Nucleotide sequence of two genes from Helicobacter pylori encoding for urease subunits. Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 362. Cousineau, J. & Meighen, E. (1976). Chemical modification of bacterial luciferase with ethoxyfomiic anhydride: evidence for an essential histidyl residue. Biochemistry 15, 4992-5000. Dixon, N. E., Riddles, P. W., Gazzola, C., Blakeley, R. L. & Zemer, B. (1980). Jack bean urease (EC 3.5.1.5). V. On the mechanism of action of urease on urea, formamide, acetamide, N-methylurea, and related compounds. Can. J. Biochem. 58, 1335-1344. Jabri, E., Lee, M. H., Hausinger, R. P. & Karplus, P. A. (1992). Preliminary crystallographic studies of urease from jack bean and from Klebsiella aerogenes urease. J. Mol. Biol. 227, 934-937. Jones, 8. D., & Mobley, H. L. T. (1989). Proteus mirabilis urease: Nucleotide sequence determination and comparison with jack bean urease. J. Bacteriol. 171, 6414—6422. Kunkel, T. A., Roberts, J. D. 8. Zakour, R. A. (1987). Rapid and efficient site- specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. Methods Enzymol. 154, 367-382. 66 Labigne. A., Cussac, V., 8. Courcovx, P. (1991). Shuttle cloning and nucleotide sequences of Helicobacter pylori genes responsible for urease activity. J. Bacteriol. 173, 1920-1931. Laemmli, U. K (1970). Cleavage of structural proteins during assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227, 680-685. Lee, M. H., Mulrooney, S. B., & Hausinger, R. P. (1990). Purification, characterization, and in viva reconstitution of Klebsiella aerogenes urease apoenzyme. J. Bacteriol. 172, 4427-4431. Lee, M. H., Mulrooney, S. B., Renner, M. J., Markowicz, Y., & Hausinger, R. P. (1992). Klebsiella aerogenes urease gene cluster: sequence of ureD and demonstration that four accessory genes (ureD, ureE, ureF, and ureG) are involved in nickel metallocenter biosynthesis. J. Bacterial. 1 74, 4324-4330. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., & Randall, R. J. (1951). Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265- 275. Martin, P. R. & Hausinger, R. P. (1992). Site-directed mutagenesis of the active site cysteine in Klebsiella aerogenes urease. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 20024-20027. Miles, E. W. (1977). Modification of histidinyl residues in proteins by diethylpyrocarbonate. Methods Enzymol. 47, 431-442. Mobley, H.L.T., 8. Hausinger, R. P. (1989). Microbial urease: significance, regulation, and molecular characterization. Microbial. Rev. 53, 85-108. M0rsdorf, G, & Kaltwasser, H. (1990). Cloning of the genes encoding urease from Proteus vulgaris and sequencing of the structural genes. FEMS Microbial. Lett. 66, 67-74. 67 Mulrooney, S. B., 8 Hausinger, R. P. (1990) Sequence of the Klebsiella aerogenes urease genes and evidence for accessory proteins facilitating nickel incorporation. J. Bacteriol. 172, 5837-5843. Mulrooney, S. B., Pankratz, H. 8., 8 Hausinger, R. P. (1989). Regulation of gene expression and cellular localization of cloned Klebsiella aerogenes (K. pneuminae) urease. J. Gen. Microbiol. 135, 1769-1776. Park, IS, 8 Hausinger, R. P. (1993). Diethylpyrocarbonate reactivity of Klebsiella aerogenes urease: effect of pH and active site ligands on rate of enzyme inactivation. J. Prat. Chem. 12, 51-56. Sakaguchi, K, Mitsui, K, Kubashi, K. 8 Hase, J. (1983). Photo-oxidation of jack bean urease in the presence of methylene blue. J. Biochem. 93, 681- 686. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F ., and Maniatis, T. (1989). Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. Sanger, F ., Mickie, S. 8 Coulson, A. R. (1977). DNA sequencing with chain- terminating inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. SA. 80, 3963-3965. Takishima, K, Suga, T., 8 Mamiya, G. (1988). The structure of jack bean urease. The complete amino acid sequence, limited proteolysis and reactive cysteine residues. Eur. J. Biochem. 175, 151-165. Todd, M. J. 8 Hausinger, R. P. (1987). Purification and characterization of the nickel-containing multicomponent urease from Klebsiella aerogenes. J. Biol. Chem. 262, 5963-5967. Todd, M. J. 8 Hausinger, R. P. (1989). Competitive inhibitors of Klebsiella aerogenes urease: mechanisms of interaction with the nickel active site. J. Biol. Chem. 264, 15835-15842. 68 Todd, M. J. 8 Hausinger, R. P. (1991 a). Reactivity the essential thiol of Klebsiella aerogenes urease. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 10260-10267. Todd, M. J. 8 Hausinger, R. P. (1991b). Identification of the essential cysteine residue in Klebsiella aerogenes urease. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 24327- 24331. Weatherbum, M. W. (1967). Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Anal. Chem. 39, 971-974. Vlfilkinson (1961). Statistical estimations in enzyme kinetics. Biochem. J. 80, 324-332. CHAPTER 4 In Vitro Activation of Urease Apoprotein and Role of UreD as a Chaperone Required for Nickel Metallocenter Assembly These studies, less those shown in Fig. 1 and combined with urease activation studies of cell extracts by Mary Beth Carr, were published in Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80, 396-3965, 1994. 69 70 ABSTRACT The formation of active urease in Klebsiella aerogenes requires the presence of three structural genes for the apoprotein (ureA, ureB, and ureC), as well as four accessory genes (ureD, ureE, ureF, and ureG) that are involved in functional assembly of the metallocenter in this nickel-containing enzyme. Partial activation of urease apoprotein was observed after adding nickel ion to extracts of Escherichia coli cells bearing a plasmid containing the K. aerogenes urease gene cluster or derivatives of this plasmid with deletions in ureE, ureF, and ureG. In contrast, extracts of cells containing a ureD deletion derivative failed to generate active urease, thus highlighting a key role for UreD in the metallocenter assembly process. Site-directed mutagenesis methods were used to overexpress ureD in the presence of the other urease genes, and UreD was found to co-purify with urease. A molecule of native urease apoprotein is capable of binding 0, 1, 2, or 3 molecules of UreD, consistent with a trimeric structure of urease catalytic units. The UreD-urease apoprotein complexes are competent for activation by nickel, with the level of activity obtained being directly related to the number of UreD bound per urease molecule. Activation of the UreD-urease complexes is rapid and accompanied by UreD dissociation. I propose that UreD is a chaperone protein which stabilizes a urease apoprotein conformation that is competent for nickel incorporation. 71 INTRODUCTION Urease (EC 3.5.1.5) is a nickel-containing enzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of urea to form carbonic acid and two molecules of ammonia. Until recently, the best characterized urease was that from jack bean (1 ). This enzyme was the first ever crystallized (2) and the first shown to possess nickel (3). However, because of the ease of cell growth and genetic manipulation in bacteria compared to plants and the medical importance of bacterial urease, our understanding of the procaryotic enzyme has outpaced knowledge of the plant enzyme (4). lmportantly, the active site residues of plant and bacterial ureases are highly conserved and both enzymes possess a novel bi-nickel metallocenter. Assembly of the urease bi-nickel metallocenter appears to be a complex process requiring the action of several accessory gene products. For example, deletion analysis of the Klebsiella aerogenes urease gene cluster revealed that one gene (ureD) located directly upstream and three genes (ureE, ureF, and ureG) found directly downstream of the three genes (ureA, ureB, and ureC) encoding the subunits of the bacterial urease are involved in the functional assembly of the urease metallocenter (5, 6). Homologs of the accessory genes have been found in several bacterial species (39., 7-9) and an essential role for auxiliary genes in forming active urease has been confirmed in these and many other bacteria. Genetic studies are consistent with a similar requirement for urease accessory genes in the fungi Neurospora crassa (10), Schizosaccharomyces pombe (11), and Aspergillus nidulans (12, 13). Finally, two loci (Eu2 and Eu3) that appear to encode genes associated with urease maturation factors such as nickel emplacement have been identified in soybean plants (14). Thus, accessory genes involved in metallocenter'assembly may be a universal component of urease activation. The detailed roles for the urease accessory genes are unknown. The histidine- rich K. aerogenes UreE protein has been purified and shown to reversibly bind six nickel ions per dimer (15); hence, it is reasonable to suggest that UreE 72 . serves as the nickel donor to urease apoprotein. UreG contains a P-loop motif that is found in many nucleotide-binding proteins (16); thus, this protein may be involved in coupling nucleotide hydrolysis to the assembly process. In this regard, in viva evidence is consistent with an energy-dependence for urease activation (17). Furthermore, the sequence of K. aerogenes UreG was shown (18) to be approximately 25% identical to that of the Escherichia coli hypB gene product (19). The hyp operon encodes a hydrogenase pleiotropic operon that is required for functional activation of hydrogenase. A mutation in hypB was shown to be complemented, in part, by the addition of high levels of nickel (20), consistent with a role for this protein in nickel processing. Of potential significance to the function of UreG, purified HypB protein has been shown to bind guanine nucleotides and to hydrolyze GTP (21). In contrast to UreE and UreG, the sequences for UreD or UreF offer no insight into their function and these proteins have not been purified or characterized. Here I demonstrate the ability to activate urease apoprotein in vitro and present evidence supporting a model in which UreD serves as a urease-specific chaperone during this process. MATERIALS AND METHODS Site-Directed Mutagenesis of the ureD Ribosome Binding Site. In order to enhance expression of ureD, the ribosome binding site and initiation codon of this gene were changed from QAQGGCACCQTG to QAQGGCACCATG by two rounds of site-directed mutagenesis. A 0.82—kb EcoRl-Sacl fragment of plasmid pKAU17 containing a urease gene cluster from K. aerogenes (22) was subcloned into M13 mp18 and mutagenized by the method of Kunkel et al. (23). Uracil-containing single-stranded template DNA was prepared from Escherichia coli CJ236 (dut1 ungi thi-1 relA1IpCJ105[cam'F']). Using a CACGGTGCCQTQCAATGTTGC oligonucleotide primer, the phage DNA was 73 . mutagenized and mutant phage were isolated in E. coli MV1193([IacI-proAB] rpsL thi endA spcB15 hst4 [srl-recA]306::Tn10[tet'] F'[traD36 praAB+ laclqlacZM15l). Uracil-containing single-stranded DNA was again prepared and similarly mutagenized with the primer GTGGTAACAIGGTGCCCTC. The site- directed mutants were identified by sequence analysis using Sequenase 2.0 (US. Biochemical Corp, Cleveland OH) and the single-strand DNA sequence method of Sanger et al. (24). The region was completely sequenced to ensure that no other mutations had been introduced into M13. The mutated EcaRl-Sacl region was subcloned back into pKAU17 to generate pKAUDZ and the sequence was confirmed by double-stranded DNA sequencing methods (25). Cell Growth and Disruption. E. coli DH5 carrying pKAUDZ, pKAU17, pKAU22AD-1 (ureD deletion derivative of pKAUZ2, ref. 6) or pKAUDABC (ureEFG deletion derivatives of pKAU17, see appendix) were grown in LB medium to stationary phase. The harvested cultures were resuspended in 20 mM phosphate (pH 7.0), 0.1 mM EDTA, and 0.1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol buffer and disrupted by three passages through a French pressure cell (American Instrument Co., Silver Spring MD) at 18,000 Ib/inz. Cell extracts were obtained after centrifugation (100,000 x g for 60 min) at 4°C. The ability to activate urease apoenzyme in E. coli [pKAUD2] extracts was stable for over 1 month when samples were stored on ice and adjusted to 20% glycerol and 0.8 mM dithiothreitol. Purification of UreD-Urease Apoprotein Complex. E. coli DH5[pKAUD2] cell extracts from a 2 L culture were chromatographed on a column (2.5 x 20 cm) of DEAE-Sepharose at 4°C in PEG buffer [16 mM phosphate (pH 7.0), 0.8 mM EDTA, 20% glycerol, 0.8 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.8 mM dithiothreitol]. The proteins were eluted in PEG buffer with a linear salt gradient to 1.0 M KCI, and UreD was found to co-elute with urease apoprotein at ~0.45 M KCI. UreD- containing fractions were pooled, dialyzed against PEG buffer, and applied to a Mono-Q HR 10/10 column equilibrated in the same buffer. A linear salt gradient to 1 M KCl in PEG buffer again eluted the UreD in the same fractions as urease. 74 - A portion of the pooled fractions containing UreD was adjusted to 1 M KCI by addition of PEG buffer containing 2 M KCI and applied to a phenyl-Superose HR 515 column equilibrated in this buffer. A linear gradient to 0 M KCI in PEG buffer was used for elution. Samples were monitored for the presence of UreD and urease apoprotein by using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis. SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was carried out by using the buffers of Laemmli (26) and included a 13.5% polyacrylamide running gel and a 4.5% polyacrylamide stacking gel. Nondenaturing gels utilized the same buffers without SDS and used 7.5% and 3% acrylamide running and stacking gels. Gels were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue or, in the case of selected native gels, blotted onto nitrocellulose, probed with anti-K. aerogenes urease antibodies (22), and developed by using anti-rabbit lgG-alkaline phosphatase conjugates (27). Band intensities were measured by using a gel scanner (Ambis, Inc.). For calculation of the ratio of UreD to UreC, M, values of 30,000 and 60,300 were used for these pepfides. Urease Activity Assays. Urease activities were assayed in 25 mM Hepes (pH 7.75) and 0.5 mM EDTA buffer containing 50 mM urea. Linear regression analysis of the released ammonia, determined by conversion to indophenol (28), versus time yielded initial rates. One unit of activity is defined as the amount of enzyme required to degrade 1 mmol urea per min at 37°C. Protein concentrations were assessed by the Spectrophotometric assay of Lowry et al. (29) or, in the case of samples containing Hepes buffer, the Bio-Rad protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond CA). RESULTS In Vitro Activation of Urease Apoprotein. E. coli [pKAU17] carries the wild- type K. aerogenes urease gene cluster. The urease apoprotein in extracts from 75 . these cells (grown in the presence of nickel-free medium) is partially activated by incubation with NiCIz at 20~500 11M (Fig. 1). Although in viva activation of urease apoprotein has been described [e.g., (17)], data obtained by Mary Beth Carr of this lab (not shown) and that shown in Fig. 1 represent the first evidence for in vitro activation of this enzyme. The highest specific activity values observed in these studies (40 U/mg protein) account for activation of only about 10% of the urease that is present [i.e., when grown in the presence of 1 mM NICI2 E. coli [pKAU17] cell extracts typically possess specific activity values of 300-400 U/mg (17, 30)]. The leveling off of activity is not due to simultaneous formation and inactivation of active enzyme because purified urease holoprotein is completely stable under the incubation conditions used for activation of the cell extracts. Alteration of the activation conditions (varying the pH, buffer composition, ionic strength, and NICI2 concentration) failed to further improve the extent of activation and the process is hindered by elevated nickel concentrations (4 mM) and high (> 8.0) or low (< 7.0) pH. Analogous urease apoprotein activation experiments were carried out using extracts from cells that were defective in ureD or ureEFG (Fig. 1). Surprisingly, deletion of ureEFG (Fig. 1) has no significant effect on the in vitro activation process. This finding is intriguing because AureF or AureG cultures possess no detectable urease activity even when provided with 1 mM nickel ion in the growth medium (6). Of greatest significance, urease apoprotein in cell extracts from a AureD mutant was not competent for activation under these activation conditions. These results highlight a key role for UreD in the urease activation 1 process. Purification of UreD-Urease Apoprotein Complex. Characterization of UreD fiom E. coli [pKAU17] is hampered by very low level expression of the ureD gene (6). We circumvented this problem by using site-directed mutagenesis to improve the ribosome binding site and to provide an ATG initiation codon for this , gene in plasmid pKAUD2. An intense band of UreD is observed on SDS- polyacrylamide gels for extracts of E. coli [pKAUDZ] (Fig. 2, lane 2) that is not 76 A 60 —— , a) . . E 50 --. . a . . 2: 40 -— . IE ° *5 30 -— < , ‘ .2 20 — . 9:. 8 A Q 10 - , _ (D , v .._I-————’ 0 i=5" ' ~ t 3F 0 30 60 90 120 Time (min) Fig. 1. In vitro activation kinetics of urease apoprotein. Cell extracts (2 mglml) from E. coli [pKAU17] (closed symbols) or AureD (x), AureEFG (open symbols) deletion derivatives were incubated in 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.9)10.08 mM EDTA! 0.08 mM 2-mercaptoethanol containing 20 (square), 50 (triangle), 100 (diamond), or 500 (circle, x) uM NiClz at 37°C. Aliquots were withdrawn and assayed for urease activity and protein. AM mu. m. m Nm 0 OI... ‘0 1' 1'0“. I'll" Icemo ICED ' ' III-Iv I I I Icemm Icemm 77 I . “II" u U "HIIIHc8>.w 3c. M. mom-oo_co~.. w. Om>m-mmo:m8mm coo: 8. 2.26-0 coo: m-m. creasmcomamo 48963 3. man .-w Ammo .na. 8. m. Somme. 78 . present in extracts of E. coli [pKAU17] (not shown). Using extracts from E. coli [pKAUD2] cells that were grown in the absence of nickel, UreD was found to co- elute with urease during two steps of ion exchange chromatography and during hydrophobic interaction chromatography on phenyl-Superose HR 5/5. The latter step resolves the UreD/urease species into four pools that were termed flow- through (FT) and fractions 1, 2, and 3 (Fig. 3). UreD and urease apoprotein are unlikely to be present as a complex in the FT fraction because these proteins are resolved using phenyI-Sepharose CL-4B chromatography (not shown). In contrast, fractions 1, 2, and 3 do appear to represent distinct UreD-urease apoprotein complexes. The ratio of UreD to urease apoprotein in the phenyI-Superose fractions is not uniform as demonstrated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel analysis (Fig. 2, lanes 6-8). Given that urease is a trimer of catalytic units (P. A. Karplus, personal communication), our gel scanning results are consistent with the presence of 1.0-1.3, 2.2-2.5, and 3-3.2 molecules of UreD per molecule of native urease in fractions 1, 2, and 3. Native gel electrophoresis of the four phenyl-Superose pools (Fig. 4, lanes 4-7) clearly demonstrates that four distinct urease apoprotein species are present. The FT fraction is comprised almost entirely of form I, a species that migrates identically with urease apoprotein or urease holoprotein (Fig. 4, lane 8). Fractions 1, 2, and 3, in contrast, are comprised predominantly of urease apoprotein species of decreasing mobilities that are labeled forms II, III, and IV (Fig. 4, lanes 5-7). Form Ill appears to predominate in the DEAE-Sepharose and Mono—Q pools (Fig. 4, lanes 2 and 3), and is the major fraction found on the phenyl-Superose column (Fig. 3). Mobility differences among the four urease species on native gels are likely to arise primarily from differences in native size. Gel filtration chromatography results are consistent with this hypothesis; when the Mono-Q pool was chromatographed on a Superose 6 column and the fractions analyzed by native gel electrophoresis, the overlapping order of elution was form IV, form III, form II, and form I (data not shown). Thus, we conclude that the four species observed upon phenyl- 79 0.5 . . . . 1.5 E :04 H .L .2. .55. 303 -_---——-\ .10 ,. m ' g 3 a E 0'2 _ ~05 5‘ 8 I,01- < .9 o 1111\00 510152025 Volume (ml) 0 Fig. 3. Phenyl-Superose resolution of UreD-urease complexes. Starting with extracts from E. coli [pKAUD2] cells that overexpress ureD, UreD was found to co-elute with urease apoprotein during chromatography on DEAE-Sepharose and Mono-Q resins. The latter pool was resolved into four fractions by chromatography on phenyl-Superose. Elution was monitored by absorbance at 280 nm, and the pooled samples are denoted flow-through (FT) and fractions 1, 2, and 3. 80 0,30 0 4 m 08...» 0| [.7 3. ._. new. Illlll w III-I. I‘ll 0' m6. 8. 2030 002.002.03.00 n0. 0.00.8220? 02020.0 0.. 20000 20022.0. .0300“ .-m 020 00:20.03 8 .0300 m0 2 In. N 0-.» 20 30 0030 .62 0303.79.08.00 2002030 00 3 .0300 82. 0:. 022 30:00:03 0.. 30 0030.00 22 .oo 3.: 0. 01.0 3 30 2000300 0.. 0.. 32. 2.0.». 81 . Superose chromatography and resolved by native gel electrophoresis arise from the presence of different numbers of UreD (0, 1, 2, or 3) complexed to the native urease enzyme. Activation of UreD-Urease Apoprotein Complexes. When adjusted to 0.1 mM NICIz, urease apoprotein is activated to different extents in each of the four phenyI-Superose pools (Fig. 5). Importantly, the greater the ratio of UreD to urease apoprotein, the greater is the final specific activity of the preparation. The small amounts of activation observed in the FT fraction are likely to arise from trace contamination with the form Il species that contain UreD. The activation process for the UreD-urease complexes is rapid. The highest level of activity reached (~550 Ulmg protein) accounts for approximately 30% of full activation for the urease apoprotein that is present in the predominantly form IV species [assuming one UreD per catalytic unit (M, of 113,000) and a specific activity of 2,500 Ulmg protein for fully active urease (6)]. This level of activation is even more impressive when one considers that full activation of urease is not observed in E. coli [pKAU17] cells grown in the presence of 1 mM NICI2 [with typical specific activity values of 1,500-1,900 Ulmg (6, 30)]. These results are consistent with the presence of a UreD-urease complex playing a central role in urease activation. Upon treatment with nickel ion, the form II, III, and IV species observed in native gels collapse to the form I species for each of the phenyl-Superose pools (Fig. 4, lanes 9-12). These results are consistent with dissociation of UreD during the activation process. A band corresponding to UreD is not observed in the native polyacrylamide gels, perhaps due to the inability of the highly insoluble protein to enter the gel. Rapid and high level in vitro urease apoprotein activation (to ~200 Ulmg total protein) similarly was observed in cell extracts of the E. coli [pKAUD2] cells upon addition of nickel ion. If urease is estimated to account for approximately 20% of the protein in these cell extracts (see Fig. 2, lane 1), this result allows me to calculate a specific activity for urease of about 1,000 Ulmg in this sample. 82 600 . . i . a a g 500- , 3 @400" A '1 > :3 300- ~ < J 5% 200: 8 $100 a ~ 0 1 0 20 40 60 80 100 Time (min) Fig. 5. Activation kinetics of the UreD-urease complexes. The four phenyl- Superose pools [FT (O) and fractions 1 (I), 2 (A), and 3 (7)] from Fig. 3 were incubated at 37°C in the presence of 0.1 mM NICIz in 25 mM Hepes (pH 7.9), 0.15 M KCI and aliquots were removed and assayed for urease activity over time. 83 . Optimal activity was observed from pH 7.6 to 8.2 and using 0.5 mM NICIz. Phosphate strongly inhibits the activation process at concentrations greater than 20 mM. Surprisingly, growth of E. coli [pKAUD2] in the presence of 1 mM NiCIz yields cell extract activities that are very low (3-15 Ulmg), equivalent to 1-5% of the activity found in E. coli [pKAU17] cell extracts. It is possible that this result may relate, at least in part, to the low level expression of ureG that is observed in these cells compared to cells containing pKAU17. Addition of nickel to these low activity cell extracts results in rapid and high level activation, similar to the extracts from cells obtained by nickel-free conditions. Using anti-urease antibodies and Western blot analysis of cell extracts electrphoresed through a native gel, the three UreD-urease complexes from E. coli [pKAUD2] were shown to collapse almost entirely to the form I (UreD-free apoprotein or holoprotein) species (Fig. 6, lanes 4-5) after incubation with 0.3 mM nickel. More significantly, the presence of at least two UreD-urease complexes (forms II and III) was established in E. coli [pKAU17] cells that do not overexpress ureD. Furthermore, nickel addition to these cell extracts also was shown to lead to diminishment of the bands corresponding to these complexes (Fig. 6, lane 2-3). DISCUSSION I propose that urease apoprotein activation occurs by the mechanism illustrated in Fig. 7. [This simplified model does not indicate that two nickel are incorporated per catalytic unit or that three catalytic units are present per native enzyme]. UreD is proposed to be a chaperone protein that stabilizes a conformation of urease that is competent for nickel incorporation. This role is reminiscent of that suggested for MW in activation of apodinitrogenase by the iron-molybdenum cofactor (31, 32) and for MelC1 in incorporating copper into tyrosinase (33, 34). The in vitro source of nickel in the proposed urease 84 IV- I— “N...- .1» Fig. 6. Western blot comparison of cell extracts before and after nickel activation. Samples were activated by incubation for 100 min in 0.3 mM NICIz, 25 mM Hepes (pH 7.9). Lanes: 1, purified urease; 2, cell extracts of E. coli [pKAU17]; 3, same as 2 after activation; 4, E. coli [pKAUD2] cell extracts; 5, same as 4 after activation. 85 n- see-m Fig. 7. Simplified model illustrating the functional role for UreD in urease 4 x 2 apoprotein activation. 86 . metallocenter assembly mechanism is NiClz, whereas, nickel bound to UreE may fill this role in viva (15). The roles of UreF and UreG in the activation process remain unclear, however, it is reasonable to speculate that they may function in assembly of the UreD-urease complex (step 1), in facilitating interactions between the complex and UreE (step 2), by enhancing the level of activation during UreD release (step 3), or in recycling of UreD (step 4). The energy- dependence of activation that was observed in vivo (17), but not in vitro (above), and the low level of activation observed in E. coli [pKAU17] cell extracts can be interpreted in terms of this model. For example, it is possible that UreD recycling requires energy, whereas single turnover of the UreD-urease complex does not. The levels of in vitro activation that we observe are consistent with generation of active enzyme only from the UreD-urease complexes, with no recycling of UreD. It is possible that, in the absence of sufficient UreD, partially folded urease that is newly released from the ribosome undergoes a final conformational change to bury the nickel binding site. Our in vitro conditions are inadequate to allow the folded apoprotein to revert to the partially unfolded state that binds UreD and is capable of activation; however, this species does appear to be slowly activated in viva (17). This working model may help to focus future efforts to understand urease metallocenter assembly. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 87 REFERENCES Zemer, B. (1991) Bioorg. Chem. 19, 116-131. Sumner, J. B. (1926) J. Biol. Chem. 69, 435-441. Dixon, N. E., Gazzola, C., Blakeley, R. L. 8 Zemer, B. (1975) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 97, 4131 -4133. Mobley, H. L. T. 8 Hausinger, R. P. (1989) Microbial. Rev. 53, 85-108. Mulrooney, 8. B. 8 Hausinger, R. P. (1990) J. Bacterial. 172, 5837-5843. Lee, M. H., Mulrooney, S. B., Renner, M. J., Markowicz, Y. 8 Hausinger, R. P. (1992) J. Bacteriol. 174, 4324-4330. Cussac, V., Ferrero, R. L. 8 Labigne, A. (1992) J. Bacterial. 174, 2466- 2473. Jones, 8. D. 8 Mobley, H. O. T. (1989) J. Bacterial. 171, 6414-6422. Collins, C. M. 8 Gutman, D. M. (1992) J. Bacterial. 174, 883-888. Benson, E. W. 8 Howe, H. B., Jr. (1978) Molec. Gen. Genet. 165, 277- 282. Kinghom, J. R. 8 Fluri, R. (1984) Curr. Genet. 8, 99-105. Mackay, E. M. 8 Pateman, J. A. (1982) Biochem. Genet. 20, 763-776. Mackay, E. M. 8 Pateman, J. A. (1980) J. Gen. Microbial. 116, 249-251. Meyer-Bothling, L. E., Polacco, J. C. 8 Cianzio, 8. R. (1987) Molec. Gen. Genet. 209, 432-438. Lee, M. H., Pankratz, H. 8., Wang, 8., Scott, R. A., Finnegan, M. G., Johnson, M. K., lppolito, J. A., Christianson, D. W. 8 Hausinger, R. P. (1 993) Protein Sci. 2, 1042-1052. Saraste, M., Sibbald, P. R. 8 Wittinghofer, A. (1990) Trends Biochem. Sci. 15, 430-434. Lee, M. H., Mulrooney, S. B. 8 Hausinger, R. P. (1990) J. Bacterial. 172, 4427-4431. Wu, L.-F. (1992) Res. Microbial. 143, 347-351. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31 . 32. 33. 88 . Lutz, A., Jacobi, A., Schlensog, V., Bdhm, R., Sawers, G. 8 Book, A. (1 991 ) Mal. Microbial. 5, 123-1 35. Waugh, R. 8 Boxer, D. H. (1986) Biochimie 68, 157-166. Maier, T., Jacobi, A., Sauter, M. 8 Beck, A. (1993) J. Bacteriol. 175, 630- 635. Mulrooney, S. B., Pankratz, H. 8. 8 Hausinger, R. P. (1989) J. Gen. Microbial. 135, 1769-1776. Kunkel, T. A., Roberts, J. D. 8 Zakour, R. A. (1987) Meth. Enzymalogy 154, 387-382. ' Sanger, F., Mickle, S. 8 Coulson, A. R. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80, 3963-3965. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. 8 Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY), 2nd Ed. Laemmli, U. K (1970) Nature (London) 227, 680-685. Blake, M. 8., Johnston, K. H., Russel-Jones, G. L. 8 Gotschlich, E. C. (1984) Anal. Biochem. 136, 175-179. Weatherbum, M. W. (1967) Anal. Chem. 39, 971-974. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. J. 8 Randall, R. J. (1951) J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265-275. Park, IS. 8 Hausinger, R. P. (1993) Protein Sci. 2, 1034-1041. White, T. C., Harris, G. S. 8 Orme-Johnson, W. H. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 24007-24016. Homer, M. J., Paustian, T. D., Shah, V. K. 8 Roberts, G. P. (1993) J. Bacterial. 175, 4907-4910. Chen, L.-Y., Chen, M.-Y., Leu, W.-M., Tsai, T.-Y. 8 Lee, Y.-H. W. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 1 8710-1 8716. Chen, L.-Y., Leu, W.-M., Wang, K.-T. 8 Lee, Y.-H. W. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 20100-20207. CHAPTER 5 Carbon Dioxide is Required for in vitro Assembly of the Urease Nickel Metallocenter These studies were submitted to Science. 89 90 ABSTRACT In vivo assembly of the urease metallocenter is known to require four accessory proteins: UreD, postulated to be a urease-specific molecular chaperone, UreE, a Ni(ll)—binding protein, and UreF and UreG whose functions remain obscure. In vitro activation of purified Klebsiella aerogenes urease apoprotein has now been accomplished by simply providing CO; (half-maximal activation at ~0.2% C02) in addition to nickel ion. Activation requires that CO; be incorporated into urease in a pH-dependent reaction (PK. 2 9). CO; concentration also affects the level of activation for UreD-urease apoprotein complexes. I propose that CO; binding to urease apoprotein generates a ligand that facilitates productive nickel binding. 91 , Urease, the first enzyme ever crystallized (1) or shown to possess nickel (2), is found in selected plants, fungi, and bacteria where it plays important roles in environmental nitrogen transformations and as a virulence factor in certain pathogenic microbes (3). The protein contains a dinuclear Ni(ll) active site (4) where each metal atom has a Ni(imidazole),(N,O),-,,, (x = 2 or 3) coordination environment according to X-ray absorption spectroscopic analysis (5). In viva assembly of this novel metallocenter in Klebsiella aerogenes (6) involves the participation of four accessory gene products: UreD, UreE, UreF, and UreG (7). UreD has been postulated to function as a molecular chaperone that stabilizes a urease apoprotein conformation which is competent for nickel incorporation (8). Evidence consistent with this hypothesis includes the ability to purify several forms of a UreD-urease apoprotein complex [(urease)3UreDN, where N = 1, 2, or 3], the demonstration that the complexes can be partially activated by addition of nickel ions (increasing levels of activation correlate to increasing N), and the finding that UreD dissociates from urease during activation. UreE has been proposed to serve as a nickel donor for urease activation (9). This suggestion was based on the ability of the protein to bind approximately six nickel ions per dimer (Kd ~10 M) with rather high specificity. The roles for UreF and UreG in urease activation are unknown, but they are absolutely essential for activation in viva. Of related interest, UreG is homologous in sequence to HypB, a GTP-binding protein that is required for incorporation of nickel into hydrogenase (10, 11). Here, I demonstrate that mrbon dioxide is required for in vitro activation of urease apoprotein. l detail several properties of this system, propose a mechanism for the in vitro process, and discuss how UreD may assist in urease activation. Purified K. aerogenes urease apoprotein can be activated in the absence of any accessory protein by incubation with nickel ion in the presence of bicarbonate- containing buffers (Fig. 1A). Bewuse bicarbonate is in equilibrium with dissolved mrbon dioxide in solution, it becomes imperative to determine which species is the actual activating factor. By using NaHCOa from stock solutions that were adjusted to 92 . pH 4.2 or pH 8.5 [the dissolved CO; concentration is much greater in the former (12)], urease activation was demonstrated to be carbon dioxide-dependent (Fig. 18). Additional support for this conclusion was obtained from experiments in which carbonic anhydrase was included in the activation mixture. The initial rapid activation (complete by ~5 min) observed for sample amended with the low pH NaHCOa stock solution is eliminated in the presence of carbonic anhydrase due to immediate hydration of dissolved CO; at the pH of the assay (Fig. 1B). The bicarbonate/C02 concentration affects the extent of activation (Fig. 1A); the maximal specific activity (~310 Ulmg) in this illustratration accounts for activation of approximately 12.5% of the urease apoprotein that was present, but activation of up to 30% was observed in another apoprotein preparation. Half-rnaximal activation of urease apoprotein at pH 8.3 occurs at approximately 10 mM bicarbonate concentration, corresponding to about 0.063 mM or 0.2% CO; (13) [for comparison, the CO; concentration in the atmosphere is approximately 0.03% (12)]. The activating C02 molecule becomes part of the enzyme as shown by measuring incorporation of 1“C-NaHCOt ( 14). The labeling accounted for incorporation of 0.48 bicarbonate wrbon atoms per protein molecule. The specific activity generated in this experiment (241 Ulmg) is much less than 48% of that expected for fully active enzyme (~2500 Ulmg, 15); thus, CO; incorporation does not equate to enzyme activation and other factors are important. The nickel ion concentration dependence for urease apoprotein activation was assessed using buffer containing 100 mM NaHCOa (Fig. 1C). The activation rate appears to saturate at approximately 60 11M nickel ion. This value is only ~six-fold higher than the protein concentration or only 3-fold higher than that needed to load the bi-nickel site of the protein. lmportantly, prior incubation of urease apoprotein with nickel ion followed by addition of bicarbonate failed to yield active enzyme. This non-productive interaction between apoprotein and nickel ion may account for the low extent of activation described above. Activation of urease apoprotein under an atmosphere of 0.3% C02 exhibited 93 Fig. 1. In vitro activation of urease apoprotein. Urease apoprotein was purified from Escherichia coli DH5 cells bearing plasmid pKA022ureD—1, containing the K. aerogenes gene cluster deleted in ureD, as previously described (7). Enzyme activity was assayed in 25 mM HEPES, 0.5 mM EDTA, 50 mM urea (pH 7.75). The specific activity of urease was calculated based on linear regression analysis of the rate of released ammonia, determined by conversion to indophenol (21 ), and protein concentration determination (22). One unit of urease activity is defined as the amount of enzyme required to degrade 1 mmol of urea per min at 37°C. (A) Apoprotein (0.8 mglml or 9.6 uM final concentration) was added to activation buffer [100 mM Hepes (pH 8.3), 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA] containing 100 pM MCI; and 0 (O), 1 (I), 3 (A), 10 (O), 30 (A), 100 (El) and 200(0) mM NaHCOs at 35°C. Aliquots were removed overtime to monitor for urease activity. The results are representative of four independent experiments. (B) Apoprotein (as above) was placed in activation buffer containing 200 M NICIz at 0°C. NaHC03 was immediately added (final concentration of 1 mM) from 4 mM stock solutions that were prepared at pH 4.2 (O) or 8.5 (A) and timed aliquots were removed for assay. An identical low pH NaHC03 stock solution experiment was carried out in the added presence of mrbonic anhydrase (0.2 mglml) (O). The figure represents the combined results of three separate experiments. (C) Apoprotein (as above) was incubated at 35°C in activation buffer containing 100 mM NaHCO;. and mm; was added to a concentration of 10 (O), 20 (I), 30 (A), 40 (O), 60, (A), or 100 (El) 11M. Aliquots were removed and assayed at the indicated timepoints. The results are representative of four independent experiments. (D) Activation buffers containing 100 mM Hepes (O or O) or Ches (A or A), 100 M NiClz, and 0.2 mglml mrbonic anhydrase (added to speed up the rate of equilibration) were incubated at 35°C in the presence of 0.3% CO; atmosphere. After a 30 min incubation, apoprotein (as above) was added and aliquots were removed for assay at 45 (open symbols) and 120 (closed symbols) min. The indicated pH values were measured at the conclusion of the experiment. The results are representative of two independent experiments. 8.A.(Ulmg) i§ 8.A.(U/mg) i§ I 60 120 180 240 300 Time(min) l 1 J r I 1 fi 120 180 240 300 Time(min) 8.A.(Ulmg) B 0.03 ,_ .. . Q . O O . O 0 0m - ' 8.. O :' O 0.01 " .0 0.0 O 419.908 0.00 °’° i 1 t 0 3 6 12 Time(n'in) 200 -— D 150 - a E a 100 - <2 a) 50 .l 0 4 i t t 1 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 95 . a clear pH dependence (Fig. 1D) with buffers of increasing pH leading to greater rates of activation. The pK. of the activation process is 9 or greater, higher pH values could not be examined because of the excessive amounts of bicarbonate that would be present in the reaction mixture. Urease activation kinetics, in which the extent of reaction is governed by the CO; concentration and the rate is controlled by the nickel ion concentration, can be accomodated by either an interaction of CO; with apoprotein prior to metal ion binding or formation of a metal ion/CO; complex that binds to the apoprotein. There exists a well characterized biologiwl precedent for the former mechanism involving ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylaseloxygenase (Rubisco). This magnesium- dependent enzyme has been shown to be activated by reaction of a lysine residue with 002, where the resulting carbamate serves as a metal ligand (reviewed in 16). A similar activation step may occur in 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) oxidase, a ferrous ion-dependent enzyme (17). As we observe for urease, the activation rates for these enzymes are enhanced at higher pH (18, 19). I propose that metallocenter assembly into urease apoprotein occurs by a pH-dependent reaction between a protein sidechain and an activating C02 molecule to generate a ligand that facilitates productive nickel binding. Unlike Rubisco and ACC oxidase, however, urease activation is not reversed by addition of metal ion chelators. We speculate that urease activation may include a protein conformational change that serves to trap the metallocenter. The ability to partially activate urease apoprotein in the absence of any accessory protein compelled me to re-evaluate the previous suggestion that UreD functions as a molecular chaperone (8); thus, we examined the effect of CO; on activation of a mixture of UreD-urease apoprotein complexes [(urease)3UreDN, where N = 0, 1, 2, and 3; a 1.6]. The extent of activation was shown to depend on the bicarbonate concentration (Fig. 2A) and the rate was found to depend on nickel ion concentration (Fig. 28) with concentration dependences and kinetics that closely resemble data obtained for urease apoprotein alone (Fig. 1A and 1C). 600-- A i 500-- .:/ -400“ / A U) D 5 f s 2300*-/ 2 < < "’ 200, a: i ioo-i' 0 t i i i i O T . 3 . fi 060120180240300 060120180240300 Time (min) Time (min) 71' C 5! 05‘- 43. (D4- “6 :23 (U cr 2 + _, 1 O o. 0 50 100 150 200 [NaHC 03] (mM) Fig. 2. In vitro activation of UreD-urease apoprotein complex. A mixture of the UreD- urease apoprotein complexes was enriched through the Mono 0 HR 10/10 step of purification as previously described (8). The (A) bicarbonate dependence of activation and (B) nickel dependence of activation for the protein complex (0.8 mglml) was carried out as described for the apoprotein alone (Fig. 1A and Fig. 1C, respectively). The ratio of the specific activities that are generated during activation of the UreD-urease apoprotein and the urease apoprotein are compared as a function of bicarbonate concentration for 4 min (0) and 300 min (O) of activation. 97 . Furthermore, 0.51 carbon molecules were incorporated into urease from 1‘C- NaHCOe treatment of the ureD-urease apoprotein complex mixture, again in close agreement with the urease apoprotein studies. However, the final level of activation for the UreD-urease complex mixture is higher than for the urease apoprotein alone, with the effect most pronounced at the lowest bicarbonate concentrations (Fig. 20). Indeed, the indiwted ratios for activation are underestimated by a factor of 1.19 if one converts Ulmg total protein to Ulmg urease protein for the experiments that include UreD (20). In order to compare the effect of UreD on initial activation rates, the activities at 4 min were compared for the UreD-urease apoprotein complex and the apoprotein (Fig. 2C). The presence of UreD appears to accelerate the rate at low bicarbonate concentrations, but at concentrations above ~50 mM the rate is reduced in the presence of UreD. Like apoprotein, the UreD-urease apoprotein complex was shown to form a non-productive nickel-urease species; however, the presence of UreD appears to reduce the rate of this inactivation step. For example, 10 min incubation of urease apoprotein with 100 [M nickel ion prior to adding bicarbonate reduces its ability to be activated to 8.8% of that in which nickel ion and bicarbonate are provided simultaneously, whereas, UreD-urease apoprotein complex that is treated in a similar manner retains 25% of its ability to be activated. These results confirm the importance of UreD to urease activation at low concentrations of CO; and suggest a mechanism for this protein. I propose that UreD functions, at least in part, to minimize non-productive binding of nickel to apoprotein that lacks bound C02; i.e., the protein species that is expected to predominate at low C02 concentrations. This function, if verified by further studies, may still be considered that of a molecular chaperone in which UreD controls the proper sequence of activation steps so that CO; binds prior to nickel ion. :PSPN.‘ .01 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 98 REFERENCES AND NOTES J. B. Sumner, J. Biol. Chem. 69, 435 (1926). N. E. Dixon et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 97, 4131 (1975). H. L. T. Mobley and R. P. Hausinger, Microbial. Rev. 53, 85 (1989). R. P. Hausinger, in Biochemistry of Nickel (Plenum Publishing Corp., New York, 1993), pp. 23-57. S. Wang et al., Inorg. Chem. 33, 1589 (1994). K. aerogenes urease is comprised of three subunits (M, 11,086, 11,695, and 60,304) arranged in a (0437):, structure containing three active sites (4). Protein or urease concentrations indicated here refer to the (1.87 catalytic unit. M. H. Lee et al., J. Bacteriol. 174, 4324 (1992). IS Park, M. B. Carr, R. P. Hausinger, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 3233 (1994). M. H. Lee et al., Protein Sci. 2, 1042 (1993). A Lutz et al., Mol. Microbiol. 5, 123 (1991). T. Maier et al., J. Bacteriol. 175, 630 (1993). J. N. Butler, Carbon Dioxide Equilibria and their Applications (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA, 1982). Calculation of the dissolved CO; concentration was based on the equation [00,] = CT[H‘]2/(K.1K.2 + K.,[H‘] + [H‘]:), where cT is 10 mM, [H‘] is 5.01 x 10" (for pH = 8.3), and values for pK.t and W.,; were 6.0 and 9.74 (interpolated from Tables 2.1 and 2.2 of ref. 12), respectively. Conversion from mM to % concentrations used Henry's law with pKH estimated to be 1.61 (interpolated from the same source). Urease apoprotein (0.5 mglml final concentration) was incubated in the standard activation buffer containing 100 M NICIz and 50 mM NaHCOa (1.44 mCi/mmole) for 9 h, quenched with EDTA (5 mM final concentration), and 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 99 . chromatographed using a Mono Q 10l10 column as previously described (15). Following chromatography, the enzyme specific activity was measured and the specific radioactivity was determined using a scintillation counter with measurement of the stock Nal-lCOa radioactivity used as a control. Analogous experiments were carried out with a mixture of the UreD-urease apoprotein complexes at 0.79 mglml. M. J. Todd and R. P. Hausinger, J. Biol. Chem. 264, 15835 (1989). F. C. Hartman and M. R. Harpel, Annu. Rev. Biochem. 63, 197 (1994). J. G. Dong, J. C. Femandez-Maculet, S.‘ F. Yang, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 9789 (1992). G. H. Lorimer, M. R. Badger, T. J. Andrews, Biochemistry 15, 529 (1976). J. C. Femandez-Maculet, J. G. Dong, S. F. Yang, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 193, 1 168 (1993). For converting Ulmg total protein to Ulmg urease protein for the UreD-urease complexes, the measured specific activity was multiplied by M, (urease)3UreDN and divided by M2 (urease)3, where (urease): has M, 249,300 and UreD has M, 29,807. M. W. Weatherbum, Anal. Chem. 39, 971 (1967). O. H. Lowry et al., J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265 (1951). CHAPTER 6 RELATED STUDIES, AND PROSPECTS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH 100 1 01 A. Characterization of aHis-219 and otHis-312 mutant proteins The 0His-219 residue was suggested to be important for substrate binding, based on the high Km value of the 0H219A mutant protein (1 ). Two possible mechanisms to account for this result include (i) stabilization of urea binding by hydrogen-bond formation and (ii) maintenance of catalytic site accessibility by protein configurational support involving the imidazole group. Reductions in the rates of urease inactivation by alkylating agents and diethylpyrocarbonate (DEP) are consistent with diminished active site accessibility of the 0H219A mutant protein. To further examine the function of this residue, l constructed and partially characterized glutamine (0H219Q) and asparagine (0H219N) mutant proteins. Unlike the alanine mutant, these changes may still enable hydrogen-bonding to take place, and these residues have more of a resemblance to histidine in terms of shape and size. Both mutant proteins have lower K.,. values (~ 175 mM for 0H219N or ~227 mM for 0H2190) compared to the alanine mutant protein (~ 2100 mM) (Table 1); however, the values are still higher than that of the wild-type protein (~ 2.25 mM). The aH219N protein, like orH219A, had 10~20-fold effects on the rate, whereas the 0H219Q protein possessed a rate that was only ~1/2 that of the wild-type enzyme. The optimal pH for catalysis was found to be ~6.2 in the 0H219N protein and ~6.5 in the 0H2190 protein (Fig. 1A and 8), compared to a value of 7.75 in the wild-type and H219A samples. The role of the aHis-219 residue remains unclear. Further characterization, e.g. selected chemical inactivation studies of these mutant proteins, may be useful to allow us to further define the function of this amino acid. Furthermore, additional synthesis of mutant proteins with bigger amino acids, such as tryptophan, in place of the aHis-219 residue may be necessary to confirm theeffect of amino acid side chain size on substrate binding. 0His-320 was proposed to act as a general base in catalysis (1 ). Evidence consistent with this hypothesis includes the rapid inactivation of the 102 Table 1. Characteristics of wild-type and selected mutant Klebsiella aerogenes ureases'. Km° kcat° Assay‘ Urease” (mM) Ulmg %wr pH, buffer Wild-type 2.25:0.04 296:4 100% 7.75, HEPES H219A 2092:634 14:3 5% 7.75, HEPES H219N 175:8 11.6:0.2 4% 6.2,MES H2190 227:21 134:6 45% 6.5,MES H320A 10.9:0.6 0.0049:0.0002 0.0017% 6.2,MES H320N 7.4:0.5 0.0043:0.0001 0.0015% 6.2,MES H3200 10.6:1 .0 0.0024:0.0001 0,0008% 6.2,MES ‘ Determined for cell extracts. SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoretic analysis revealed that the urease expression levels were nearly identical in all constructs except H219N, that appears to have approximately half the urease protein of the others. ” For site—directed mutagenesis, a 1.1-kbp BamH1-Sell fragment of the pKAU17 was used as described previously (Chapter 3). The following oligonucleotides were used: GAAGATCCAAGAGGACTGG (H2190), CTGAAGATCAATGAGGACTGG (H219N), GGTCTGCCAQCATCTGGAC (H3200). GATGGTCTGCAACCATCTGG (H320N). ° Measured by using 50, 100, 130, 170, 250, and 1000 mM urea for the His-219 mutant proteins or 2, 2.5, 3.5, 5, 10, and 50 mM for other proteins. ‘ Assays were carried out in 25 mM buffer containing 0.5 mM EDTA. 103 12 1- i A T B ”8'”. 300‘ (PO 9“ .0. ~11. o - . a 200 - E’- 5 °oc88 ‘5 o 4 0° 0 a) o to 100 -~ 3-~ at“. q. 60 o 8. OO .0. o 0 g .‘0 . 0 ° . 5 7 9 11 5 7 9 11 pH pH 0.006 T 000 C o o O a 0004 0. ‘50 E . c a E c.o < O Omo 0 0002» AA AA 454 ~£°° A O F 4164“ o o A o 0 1 .2! 0—1 5 7 9 11 pH Fig. 1. The pH dependence of wild-type and mutant urease activity of cell extracts. The activities were measured for extracts of E. coli DH5 cells canying pKAU17 or mutant plasmids that encode the following proteins: (A) wild-type (Q) and the aH219Q mutant (0); (B) orH219A (Q) and 0H219N (O); (C) 0H320A (O), 0H32OQ (A), and aH320N (Q). The reaction mixtures contained urea (50 mM for wild-type enzyme and H320A, Q, and N proteins or 1 M for the 0H219A, Q, and N proteins), 0.5 mM EDTA, and the following buffers at a concentration of 25 mM: MES (pH 5.1~6.19), HEPES (6.0~9.1), and CAPS (9.4~104). 104 . wild-type enzyme by DEP (2), a histidine-selective modifier, and the resistance of 0LH320A mutant protein to inactivation by DEP (1 ). Two additional mutant proteins, aH320N and 0H320Cl, were synthesized to further examine this proposal. All three mutant proteins (0H320A, 0tH32OQ, 0H320N) have similar Km values, specific activities, and pH dependencies in catalysis (Table 1, Fig. 1C). These results indicate that the histidine residue is probably not important for steric or hydrogen bonding interactions, rather these results are indirectly consistent with the role of aHis-320 as a general base for catalysis, as suggested previously (1 ). B. Function of UreD in urease apoprotein activation Activation of urease apoprotein requires CD: as well as nickel (3). UreD was previously shown to form three protein complexes with urease apoprotein (4), and a mixture of these complexes is also competent for activation in a C02- dependent manner (3). In both cases, the activation is apparently accompanied by a non-productive inactivation process; however, the presence of UreD appears to reduce the rate of this inactivation step. Based on this finding, the UreD protein was proposed to function, at least in part, to keep apoprotein from binding nickel non-productively in the absence of C02, as illustrated in Scheme 1, where k; is reduced compared to k1. This hypothesis was further tested by characterizing the activation process for the partially resolved complex species. A molecule of urease apoprotein can associate with 1, 2, or 3 molecules of UreD (4). Each of the forms of UreD-urease apoprotein complex was enriched by chromatography of the mixture on a phenyl-Sepharose column. The urease activation kinetics look similar in all three pools (Fig. 2). At low concentrations (1 mM) of H00; (therefore, low concentrations of C02) the extent of activation for each complex was limited even in the presence of saturating concentrations (100 nM) of nickel ion (Fig. 2). Importantly, the presence of increasing numbers of UreD per urease apoprotein leads to higher activation levels in the low 105 Inactivation Inactivation Urease L) UreDt-. apoprotein ap0pro 9'" complex Ni Y C02 Ni i C02 Holoprotein Holoprotein + UreD (precipitated) bicarbonate studies. In contrast, the level of activation reached near its maximum in the presence of high concentration (100 mM) of H00; regardless of concentration (20 vs. 100 nM) of nickel ion, and the effect of UreD number was less pronounced. The results are consistent with CO; being the limiting factor in 106 _ Fig. 2. In vitro activation of the three partially purified UreD-urease apoprotein complexes. The protein complexes were purified as previously described, with minor modifications (4). E. coli DH5[pKAUD2] cell extracts from a 2 L culture were chromatographed on a column (2.5 x 20 cm) of DEAE-Sepharose at 4°C in PEDG buffer [18 mM phosphate (pH 7.0), 0.09 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 0.09 mM dithiothreitol]. The proteins were eluted in the same buffer with a linear salt gradient to 1.0 M KCI. The protein complex-containing fractions were pooled, dialyzed against PEDG buffer, and applied to a Mono-Q HR 10/10 column equilibrated in the same buffer. The protein was eluted with a linear salt gradient to 1 M KCI in PEDG buffer. The pooled fractions containing the mixture of protein complexes was adjusted to 1 M KCI by addition of PEDG buffer containing 2 M KCI and applied to a phenyl-Sepharose HP (Pharmacia) column (2.6 x 10 cm) equilibrated in this buffer. A linear gradient to 0 M KCI in PEDG buffer was used to partially resolve the protein complexes into three pools. Samples were monitored for the presence of the UreD-urease apoprotein complexes by using native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Pool 1 (eluted at 0.23~0.19 M KCI) contains apoprotein (19% of total protein), 1UreD-apoprotein (47%), 2UreD-apoprotein, (27%), and 3UreD-apoprotein (7%) (averaging to 1.00 UreD per apoprotein molecule). Apoprotein was undetectable in pool 2 ( eluted at 0.11~0.08 M KCI) which possesses 1UreD-apoprotein (16% of total protein), 2UreD-apoprotein (58%), and 3UreD-apoprotein (26%) (averaging to 2.00 UreD per apoprotein molecule). In pool 3 (eluted at 0 M KCI) only 2UreD-apoprotein and 3UreD-apoprotein were detectable (14% and 86% of total protein, respectively. averaging to 2.83 UreD per apoprotein molecule). Each pool was again chromatographed on a Mono-Q HR 10/10 column, as described above. The three species of UreD-apoprotein complex (0.2 mglml or 2.4 pM final concentration; circle: pool 1, square: pool 2, triangle: pool 3) were added to activation buffer [100 mM Hepes (pH 8.3), 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA] containing 20 (open symbols) or 100 (closed symbols) uM NiClz and 1 or 100 mM NaHCOa at 35°C. Aliquots were removed over time to monitor for urease 107 1200 ~— / /\e 100"“ 900 -— _ ”am ’5 i _. é a, 600 -- , < l T _ 05 I?" 300 *1” mm / m jg Nat-CO; O '2‘" ‘/z i T— 0 60 120 180 240 300 Time (min) activity. Enzyme activity was assayed as described elsewhere (1 ). In order to convert the specific activity values based on total protein (urease plus UreD) into values of urease specific activity, the rates were multiplied by factors of 1.12 for pool1, 1.24 for pool 2, and 1.34 for pool 3. 1 08 urease apoprotein activation and with the presence of UreD serving a more important role at low C02 levels. Each of the UreD-urease apoprotein complexes lost their ability to be activated by incubation in the presence of 100 pM NiClz prior to addition of bicarbonate. For example, an 80 min incubation with nickel almost completely abolished the ability of these proteins to be activated (Fig. 3). A 10 min incubation reduced the level of final activation to only 25~30% of the control samples (Fig. 3). lmportantly, the number of UreD bound per apoprotein affected the extent of inactivation with increasing protection observed with increasing UreD molecules bound per apoprotein. The initial activation rates of each complex were examined under four different conditions. When the activation was carried out at saturated concentrations of HCOa' (100 mM) and NiCl2 (100 nM), the rate in the pool 1 sample was the fastest (Fig. 4A). This suggests that an increasing number of UreD per urease apoprotein may hinder the rate of activation under these conditions. However, the rate of pool 3 activation becomes the fastest and that of pool 1 the slowest (Fig. 4B) when high concentrations of NiClz (100 (M) are used in the presence of low concentrations of CO; (no addition of NaHCOa). The difference apparently increases (Fig. 40) when the concentration of NiClz is even higher (200 nM). From these results it can be hypothesized that either (i) the complex is better at incorporating C02 than the apoprotein alone under low concentration of CO; or (ii) the presence of UreD may protect the urease apoprotein from undergoing nickel-induced inactivation. A low concentration of MCI: (20 nM) results in pool 1 exhibiting the fastest activation among the three pools even in the presence of low CO; (Fig. 4D). This result is compatible with hypothesis (ii); i.e., UreD may somehow prevent the nonproductive inactivation of urease apoprotein. C. Characterization of UreD 109 1500 «- Preincubation ~ ' 0 min 1200 ~— / ’6: g 900~~ 3 < 600 -— , (I) _ l’=" ‘ . 300 __ /{_ . _o 10 min JL ‘ " ”:- I 80 min 0 ' l l J.— 0 60 120 180 Time (min) Fig. 3. Inactivation of the three UreD-urease apoprotein complexes by incubation with nickel prior addition of NaHCOa. The UreD-urease apoprotein complexes (0.2 mglml; circle: pool 1, square: pool 2, triangle: pool 3, see Fig. 2 for details) were incubated with the activation buffer containing 100 (M NiClz for 0, 10, or 80 min. NaHCOa (100 mM, final concentration) was added at time 0 and aliquots were removed over time to monitor for urease activity. Calculation of Urease specific activities was done as described in Fig. 2. 110 120 '1 1 S.A(U/mg) S.A.(UImg) Time (min) 1 100 a S.A.(UImg) S.A.(UImg) Time (min) Time (min) Fig. 4. Initial activation rates of UreD-urease apoprotein complexes. The UreD- Urease apoprotein complexs (0.2 mglml; O, pool1, I, pool 2, A, pool 3, see Fig. 2 for details) were added to the activation buffer containing (A) 100 (M NiCIz and 1 00 mM NaHCO:, (8)100 uM NiC'z and no added NaHCOa, (C) 200 pM NiClz and no added NaH003, or (D) 20 uM NiC'z and no added NaHCOa, all at 35°C. Aliquots were removed over time to monitor for urease activity. Specific activity Corrections were done as described in Fig. 2. 1 1 1 . UreD has been purified only as one of three UreD-urease apoprotein complexes (4). Further characterization of UreD is required to test the validity of its suggested function as a molecular chaperone in apoprotein activation (3, 4). In this section, I describe the partial characterization of UreD and my efforts to examine the formation of the UreD-urease apoprotein complex. pKAUDG (see Appendix) was constructed to contain only the ureD gene without the urease structural genes or other accessory genes. Samples prepared from Eco/i DH5 containing this plasmid possess large amounts of UreD, which, however, was found only in the insoluble fraction (Fig. 5A, lane 3). The presence of other accessory gene products (UreE, UreF, and UreG) does not appear to be helpful for maintaining solubility of UreD (Fig. 5A). Several detergents tested (such as NP-40, Tween-20, and Triton X-100) at up to 3% concentration do not solubilize the protein. The protein was found to be capable of solubilization in the presence of urea (~6 M) or guanidine-HCI (~4 M) (Fig. 5B). This result suggests that UreD forms an inclusion body when synthesized in large amounts. It is unclear whether low level synthesis of UreD may result in a soluble protein. The denaturant (8 M urea or 4 M guanidine HCl)-solubilized protein was diluted into buffer alone or into buffer containing 1% detergent and found to be insoluble under these conditions (data not shown) To test whether another accessory gene (ureE, ureF or ureG) is required for formation of the UreD-urease apoprotein complex, plasmid pKAUDABC containing only ureD, ureA, ureB and ureC (see Appendix) was constructed. Eco/i containing this plasmid was shown to possess UreD-urease species (Fig. SC), indicating that formation of the UreD-urease apoprotein complexes does not require other accessory genes. The cell extracts prepared from E. coli [pKAUDABC] appear to have a similar level of ability to be activated in vitro as that from wild-type extracts (Chapter 4, Fig. 1). This result suggests that other accessory proteins (UreE, UreF, and UreG) are not essential for forming a urease apoprotein species that is capable of activation in vitro. 112 Fig. 5. Characterization of UreD. (A) Samples were prepared from Eco/i cells containing pKAUD6 (lane 2, 3), pKAUG1 (lane 4, 5), pKAUDG1 (lane 6, 7), or pKADEFG (lane 8, 9) (see Appendix for maps). Whole disrupted cells (lane 3, 5, 7, 9) or the supematants (lane 2, 4, 6, 8) of the cell extracts after centrifugation at 15,000 g for one hour were analyzed on SDS- polyacrylamide (12%) gel electrophoresis. Lane 1 is molecular weight markers (phosphorylase b, Mr 92,500; bovine serum albumin, Mr 66,200; ovalbumin, Mr 45,000; carbonic anhydrase, Mr 31 ,000; soybean trypsin inhibitor, Mr 21,500; and lysozyme, M, 14,400). (B) UreD present in E. coIIIpKAUD6] cells was tested for solublization in buffer containing 25 mM Hepes (pH 7.9), 150 mM NaCI, 1 mM EDTA, and 10% glycerol supplemented with 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 M urea (lane 2~7), or 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 M guanidine HCl (lane 8~13). After incubation at 0°C for 30 min, the cell extracts were centrifuged for 5 min at 15,0009. The supematants were analyzed on SDS- polyacrylamide (13.5%) gel electrophoresis. Lane 1 is molecular weight markers. Disrupted cells are shown in lane 14. (C) Western blot comparison of cell extracts of E. coli [pKAU17] (lane 1), E. coli [pKAUDABC] (lane 2) and cell extracts of E. coli [pKAUD2] (lane 3). Cell extracts were run on 6% native gel and probed with anti-urease antibody (5). 113 -3D- Apo --ZD -Apo -1D- -Apo -Apo 1 14 D. Possible role of UreF The ureF gene is absolutely essential for the formation of active urease in vivo (6). This gene is expressed at very low levels, apparently due to a weak Shine-Dalgamo (SD)-sequence (ribosome-binding site) in front of the structural gene (7). I made two site-directed mutants (pKAUF1 and pKAUF2, Fig. 6) which have changes in their ribosome binding site regions leading to matches with 3 or 5 positions compared to the consensus SD-sequences. However, the desired high level expression of UreF was not observed in cell extracts from these mutants. Although the reason for continued low level expression of ureF is not clear, there is still a prospect for the high level synthesis of UreF if the environment around the ureF gene is altered, e.g., if the other genes are deleted. While comparing UreD-urease complex samples from cells containing the intact gene cluster and various deletion mutants, a difference was observed that provides evidence for a role of UreF in complex formation. The major UreD- urease apoprotein complex in cell extracts prepared from E. coli [pKAU17] elutes earlier from a Sepharose 6 column than does the apoprotein, consistent with a larger hydrodynamic radius for UreD-urease than for urease alone (data not shown). Similar elution patterns are observed for extracts from cells canying pKAUAE-1 (Fig. 7A) or pKAUAG-1 (Fig. 7C) (i.e., ureE and ureG deletion mutants). Surprisingly, the UreD-apoprotein complex in extracts from cells carrying pKAUAF, a ureF deletion mutant, elutes at the same position as the apoprotein (Fig. 7B). This result suggests that the UreF protein may be involved in conversion of a highly compact form of UreD-urease apoprotein complex to a less compact structure where these forms are not resolved by native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. It is possible that such a conformational I change is related to the decreased level of in vitro urease activation observed in E. coli (pKAUAF) cell extracts compared to a control sample or to samples possessing ureD or ureG deletions (4). 115 pKAU1 7 CAGCCACTAGCATGTC‘" pKAUF1 CAGAQACTAGCATGTC'" pKAUF2 CAGGAGCTAGCATGTC‘" Fig. 6. Site-Directed Mutagenesis of the ureF Ribosome Binding Site. In order to enhance expression of ureF, the ribosome binding site of this gene was changed as shown above (underlined sequences) by site-directed mutagenesis methods. A 1.8-kb BamH1-Avril fragment of plasmid pKAU17 containing the urease gene cluster from K. aerogenes was subcloned into M13 mp18 and mutagenized by the method of Kunkel et al. (8). Uracil-containing single-stranded template DNA was prepared from Escherichia coli CJ236 (dut1 ung1 thi-1 relA1IpCJ105[cam'F']). Using GACATGCTAGTQICTGTGAGCGTG (pKAUF1) or GTCGACATGCTAGC_TQCTGTGAGCGTGGTG (pKAUF2) oligonucleotide primers, the phage DNA was mutagenized and mutant phage were isolated in E. coli MV1 193([IacI-proAB] rpsL thi endA spcB15 hst4 [sfl-recA]306::Tn10[tet‘] F'[traD36 proAB‘ Iacf'lacZM15]). The site-directed mutants were identified by sequence analysis using Sequenase 2.0 (US. Biochemical Corp., Cleveland OH) and the single-strand DNA sequence method of Sanger et al. (9). The region was completely sequenced to ensure that no other mutations had been introduced into M13. The mutated BamH1-Aatll region was subcloned back into pKAU17 to generate pKAUF1 and pKAUF2 and the sequence was confirmed by double-stranded DNA sequencing methods. Putative ribosome-binding sites and the start codon are highlighted. 116 Volume(m|) 28 36 44 52 60 68 76 Fig. 7. Western blot comparison of fractions from Sepharose 6 (Pharmacia) column chromatography of selected cell extracts. Cell extracts were prepared from (A) Eco/i [pKAU17AE-1], (B) [pKAU17AF], and (C) [pKAU17AG-1] and applied to a Sepharose 6 column (2.6 x 50 cm). Fractions (4 ml) were collected and aliquots were analyzed on a 6% native gel, transferred to nitrocellulose membrane, and detected by using anti-urease antibody and an alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit-lgG. 117 E. Presence of a complex containing UreD, urease apoprotein, UreF, and UreG In addition to the three UreD-urease apoprotein complexes described earlier (4), faint bands of much lower mobility that contain anti-urease antibody cross-reactive material are detected in cell extracts from E. coli DH5 containing pKAU17 (wild-type), pKAU17AE-1 and pKAU02 (abbreviated as 0*, leading to high level synthesis of UreD) in western blotting studies using anti-urease antibody (lane 1 and 3 of Fig. 5C, and lane 1 and 3 of Fig. 8). The bands are designated B in the figures because they comprise a second or B series of complexes that are distinct from the faster migrating UreD-urease complexes already discussed. lmportantly, analogous bands were not detected in the ureEFG deletion mutant (lane 2, Fig. 5C) or in ureD, ureF, or ureG deletion mutants (lane 2, 4, 5 of Fig. 8). It is very intriguing that cells found to be activation-competent in vivo possess the B complexes, whereas ureD, ureF, or ureG deletion mutants, which are not competent for in vivo activation, do not. The B complexes were enriched from extracts of cells containing pKAU17 and pKAUD2 by using DEAE-Sepharose and Mono-Q F PLC column chromatographies. The species do not separate from the UreD-urease apoprotein complexes when using Sepharose 6 size-exclusion column chromatography. This was unexpected because the B complexes migrate much more slowly than the UreD-urease apoprotein complexes during the native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Although overlapping, the peak fractions of the UreD-urease complexes elute before the peak fractions of the B complexes (Fig. 9A). When the same fractions are examined by denaturing gel electrophoresis (Fig. 9B), it is clear that the fractions containing the B complexes possess several bands in addition to those corresponding to urease and UreD. One of these additional bands was demonstrated to be UreG by a western blotting experiment using anti-UreG antibody (not shown). The other band below 118 .. ~~ -- -B - 2D-Apo .' “I «In - - 1D-Apo h ‘ - M O. ‘ - Apo ML —- Fig. 8. Western blot comparison of cell extracts. Lane 1, E. coli [pKAU17]; Lane 2, E. coli [pKAU22AD-1 ]; Lane 3, E. coli [pKAU17AE-1]; Lane 4, E. coli [pKAU17AF]; Lane 5, E. coli [pKAU17AG-1]; Lane 6, E. coli [pKAUF1] (see Fig. 6). The cell extracts were analyzed on a 5% native gel, transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane, and probed with anti-urease antibody. 119 Fig. 9. Partial purification and characterization of the urease-containing B complexes. Cell extracts from E. coli DH5 containing pKAU17 or pKAUD2 were chromatographed on a column of DEAE-Sepharose at 4°C in PEDG buffer. The proteins were eluted in the same buffer with a linear salt gradient to 1.0 M KCI. The B protein complex-containing fractions were pooled, dialyzed against PEDG buffer, and applied to a Mono-Q HR 10l10 column equilibrated in the same buffer. The proteins were eluted with a linear salt gradient to 1 M KCI in PEDG buffer with the 8 complexes eluting at ~05 M KCI. (A) Native polyacrylamide gel electrophoretic analysis of Mono-Q fractions eluting from 0.43 to 0.51 M KCI from D+ cells possessing elevated levels of UreD. (B) SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoretic analysis of the same Mono-Q fractions. M represents molecular weight markers (see Fig. 5). (C) Nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoretic analyses of Mono-Q pool of B-complex-containing fractions from E. coli DH5 [pKAUD2] (lane 1) or E. coli DH5 [pKAU17] (lane 2). (D) SDS- polyacrylamide gel electrophoretic analysis of selected pools containing B complexes. Lane 1, molecular weight markers. Lane 2, 3, and 4: cell extracts, DEAE-Sepharose pool, and Mono-Q pool of E. coli DH5 [pKAU17], respectively. Lane 5, 6, and 7: cell extracts, DEAE-Sepharose pool, and Mono-Q pool of E. coli DH5 [pKAUD2]. (E) 2D gel electrophoretic analysis of the B complex. The native gel portion containing the B complexes of the Mono-Q pool of E. coli DH5 [pKAU02] was excised, denatured, and eletrophoresed using an SDS- polyacrylamide gel. A- c. 1 2 y-r1 . ) .— -7 i}? B rt )8 Lao-Apo- —2D-Apo- -1D-Apo— —- - Apo - .- —- M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8‘ B l I -—.‘.u.—dv—-Urec ’ = UreA, B 121 UreG on the gel was excised and shown to have an N-terminal amino acid sequence that agrees with that deduced for UreF from the DNA sequence (7). As found for extracts of cells carrying pKAUD2, the pooled fractions from cells containing pKAU17 exhibit bands corresponding to the B complexes (Fig. 9C) and these fractions also appear to possess the UreF and UreG peptides (Fig. 9D). When the bands corresponding to the B complexes were excised from a native gel and re—electrophoresed on a denaturing gel, both the UreG and UreF bands were present as well as the urease subunits and UreD (Fig. 9E). Thus, I suggest that the B complexes are composed cf UreD, urease apoprotein, UreF, and UreG. Urease apoprotein that is associated with the B complexes is apparently capable of activation (Fig. 10). Upon incubation of the D+ Mono-Q fraction with 100 uM NiCIz (when this experiment was carried out, the involvement of CO; in the activation process was not known), the protein was found to undergo a change such that when analyzed by native gel electrophoresis the mutiple B complex bands collapsed (Fig. 10A) in a manner which is reminiscent of UreD- urease apoprotein activation (Chapter 4, Fig. 4). Enzyme activity was measured in individual gel slices (Fig. 10B). As expected, significant levels of activity were associated with the region associated with the UreD-urease apoprotein complexes (region 1, 2, 3, and 4 in Fig. 10A) (Fig. 10B). Significant activity was also detected in region 6 containing the B complex (Fig. 108). Enzyme activation in the region appears to be complete at 30 min (Fig. 100). The K... value determined for the enzyme in the slice of gel was ~10 mM which is a little higher than that of urease (~3 mM, measured in the same way, or ~2.25 mM, measured by using urease in solution). ATP, GTP, or high salt (up to 1 M KCl) does not dissociate the B complex into its components (data not shown). Purification of the complex will be essential for its further characterization. F. Urease apoprotein activation: possible scheme 122 Activity (U/ml) Activity (U/ml) .. O l i l 123456789 0 50100150 Region Time (min) Fig. 10. Activation of urease apoprotein associated with the B complexes. (A) The Mono-Q pool of E. coli DH5 [pKAU02] was incubated for 0 or 100 min (lane 1 and lane 2, respectively) at 37°C in the presence of 0.1 mM NiCIz and analyzed by native gel electrophoresis. (B) The same sample was incubated as described in (A) for 30 min and the urease activities were measured for 9 gel slices, cut as shown in A. (C) The effect of incubation time on the level of activity was measured in the gel slice corresponding to region 6. 123 . Urease apoprotein alone can be activated in vitro by providing nickel in the presence of C02. UreD-urease apoprotein is also activation-competent in vitro, but the presence of UreD and urease subunits is not sufficient for forming active enzyme in the cell. The activation of urease in vivo absolutely requires UreF and UreG, as well as UreD (6). It is reasonable that conditions in vivo should be different from that found in vitro; for instance, the concentration of nickel or CO; may be limited in vivo. The accessory gene products may serve to provide these activating factors. For example, UreE is known to bind nickel ion with high specificity suggesting that the protein may be the nickel donor. The B complexes are composed of UreD, UreF, UreG and urease apoprotein. It is intriguing that the 8 complexes have been found only in the activation-competent wild-type, UreD-overexpressor (D’), and UreE deletion mutant cells. From these results, I propose that the B complexes are required for in vivo activation of urease, as illustrated in Scheme 2. Inactivation Urease apoprotein Ni f 002 Holoprotein In vitro Ni$k1 UreD 124 Inactivation Mal” UreF, UreG UreD- 5 B complex apoprotein (UreD-apoprotein- complex UreF-UreG) Ni k C02 UreE-Ni i 002 Holoprotein Holoprotein + + UreD UreD, UreE, (precipitated) UreF, UreG In vitro In vivo? 125 REFERENCES . Park, I. -S. and R. P. Hausinger. 1993. Site-directed mutagenesis of Klebsiella aerogenes urease: identification of histidine residues that appear to function in nickel ligation, substrate binding, and catalysis. Protein Sci. 2:1034-1041. . Park, I. -S., and R. P. Hausinger. 1993. Diethylpyrocarbonate reactivity of Klebsiella aerogenes urease: effect of pH and active-site ligands on rate of enzyme inactivation. J. Prot. Chem.12:51-56. . Park I. -S and R. P. Hausinger. 1994. Carbon dioxide is required for in vitro assembly of the urease nickel metallocenter. Submitted to Science . Park, I. -S., M .B. Carr, and R. P. Hausinger. 1994. In vitro activation of urease apoprotein and role of UreD as a chaperone required for nickel metallocenter assembly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91:3233-3237. . Mulrooney, S. B., H. S. Pankratz, and R. P. Hausinger. 1989. Regulation of gene expression and cellular localization of cloned Klebsiella aerogenes (K. pneumoniae) urease. J. Gen. Microbiol. 135:1769-1776. . Lee, M. H., S. B. Mulrooney, M. J. Renner, Y. Markowicz, and R. P. Hausinger. 1992. Klebsiella aerogenes urease gene cluster: sequence of ureD and demonstration that four accessory genes (ureD, ureE, ureF, and ureG) are involved in nickel metallocenter biosynthesis. J. Bacteriol. 174:4324-4330. . Mulrooney, S. B., and R. P. Hausinger. 1990. Sequence of the Klebsiella aerogenes urease genes and evidence for accessory proteins facilitating nickel incorporation. J. Bacteriol. 172:5837-5843. . Kunkel, T. A., J. D. Roberts, and R. A. Zakour. 1987. Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. Methods Enzymol. 154: 367-382. . Sanger, F., S. Mickle, and A. R. Coulson. 1977. DNA sequencing with chain- terminating inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 80: 3963-3965. Appendix pKAU17, pKAUD2 and their deletion mutants Eco R1 AfI ll Bam H l Ksp l Nru I Ksp l Bsm l Ksp l Rsr Il Hind lll Inc—imma- 03* l .1 D ** L 1. D5“ L —} L DE“ I .k 1' G1* I: L DG1ttl . L DEFG‘I‘l . L A 02* B EFG* E} L BRH“ G fil—lll; 'L DZABC’L fi- i DABC‘ I -L 1' 02¢":M [ H uouJJJJuJJJUU 02:16” 1 fl * Derived from pKAU17 ** Derived from pKAUD2 : Deletion -: pUCB l:| : Urease gene 126