THESiS This is to certify that the thesis entitled THE lrlASATCHIAN-BRIDGERIAN LAND MAMMAL AGE BOUNDARY (EARLY T0 MIDDLE EOCENE) IN THE DESERTION POINT-LITTLE MUDDY AREA, SOUTHWESTERN GREEN RIVER BASIN, WYOMING presented by JOHN-PAUL ZONNEVELD has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for MJSC. degree in GEOLOGY //%Z// MaJO}’6§B5/ or Date 1/7/99 / / I 0-7639 MS U is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Institution SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL IllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllIlllllllllllllllllll 3 1293 01043 27 LIBRARY Michigan State University SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL PLACE IN RETURN BOX to move this checkout tram your ncord. To AVOID FINES Mum on or baton data duo. DATE DUE DATE DUE DATE DUE I:I_I- i WELJ WWW SUI IcoAnAi'flrmntiv Action/EMOppommity instituion THE WASATCHIAN-BRIDGERIAN LAND MAMMAL AGE BOUNDARY (EARLY TO MIDDLE EOCENE) IN THE DESERTION POINT- LITTLE MUDDY AREA, SOUTHWESTERN GREEN RIVER BASIN, WYOMING BY John-Paul Zonneveld A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Geological Sciences 1994 ABSTRACT THE WASATCHIAN-BRIDGERIAN LAND MAMMAL AGE BOUNDARY (EARLY TO MIDDLE EOCENE) IN THE DESERTION POINT- LITTLE MUDDY AREA, SOUTHWESTERN GREEN RIVER BASIN, WYOMING BY John-Paul Zonneveld A relatively diverse vertebrate assemblage is described from a continuous sedimentary sequence spanning the boundary between the Wasatchian and Bridgerian North American Land- Mammal Ages (early—middle Eocene). Two distinct faunas are separated by approximately eighty meters of unfossiliferous lacustrine sediments. The Little Muddy local fauna is assigned to the Lostcabinian (Wa7) based primarily on the presence of ngbfiogherium.nonoagagium and the co-occurrence of Egthonxg agggigggg,ygggg;gggg cf. Q. australotutug and.ggg;;g§ cf. Q. fgggivorggg. For the first time, Igggciug grayyglligggg and Aggggggxgiglwortmani are identified from the Lostcabinian of the Green River Basin. The Desertion Point local fauna is assigned to the earliest Bridgerian (Brl), based on the co- occurrence of Palagosxops cf. g. fontinalig, Bxgachygg, fig;ggg;g§g§, gmilggegtes mcgrewi, gotharctus robinggni, gaggxg gartgri, and Whghakigs ingiggig. This is the first time the Wasatchian—Bridgerian boundary has been delineated within the type area of these North American Land Mammal Ages. To my parents, Jacob and Nellie Zonneveld, for their continued support (and patience). iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are many people who deserve thanks for their part in this thesis. First and foremost I wish to thank Dr. J. Alan Holman. His guidance and friendship helped immeasurably in the completion of this study. I wish to thank the members of my committee, Drs. William S. Bartels, Richard Seltin, and Ralph Taggart, whose council and assistance have been invaluable in the preparation of this thesis. This study is part of an ongoing project investigating the vertebrate paleontology of the earliest Bridgerian in southwestern Wyoming. Drs. Gregg F. Gunnell and William S. Bartels deserve special recognition for allowing me to be a part of this project, for their advice on matters geological and paleontological, and for their years of friendship. I am grateful to Dr. William Sanders for his expert preparation of many of the fossils, to Dr. Gregg Gunnell for access to fossil vertebrates at the University of Michigan, to Ms. Paula Lomnicki, and Ms Teresa Petersen for the illustrations included in this manuscript, to Mr. John Williams, my field assistant during the 1992 field season, and to the many collectors who survived fossil collecting in the "abiotic zone". Drs. Beth Strasser, Con Childress, and iv George Junne provided invaluable insight during our many field seasons together. Drs. Holman, Gunnell, Bartels, Seltin, and Taggart reviewed and greatly improved this manuscript. Elizabeth Rachman and Ken Ford are thanked for proofreading large portions of this thesis. Peter and Ria Bulthuis are thanked for their constant encouragement in pursuing my interests in geology and paleontology. This project was supported by Geological Society of America grant 5097-92 and the Lucille Drake Pringle Endowed Fellowship (Department of Geology, Michigan State University) to John-Paul Zonneveld, by National Geographic Society and University of Michigan, Museum of Paleontology to Gregg F. Gunnell, and several Pew Foundation and Hewlett— Mellon Foundation Grants to William S. Bartels. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES ........................................... x LIST OF FIGURES ........................................ xii LIST OF PLATES ......................................... xiv ABBREVIATIONS USED ...................................... XV INTRODUCTION ............................................. 1 Location and Description ............................ 2 Materials and Methods ............................... 3 Previous Investigations ............................. 4 LITHOSTRATIGRAPHY ........................................ 8 Bridger Formation ................................... 8 Wasatch Formation .................................. 11 Green River Formation .............................. l4 FOSSIL VERTEBRATE LOCALITIES ............................ l6 FAUNAL LIST ............................................. 25 SYSTEMATIC PALEONTOLOGY ................................. 29 Kingdom Monera Phylum Cyanophyta Stromatolites ............................ 31 Kingdom.Animalia Phylum Arthropoda Class Crustacea Subclass Ostracoda ......................... 33 vi Phylum Mollusca Class Gastropoda Order Mesogastropoda Family Viviparidae .................. 34 Family Pleuroceridae ................ 35 Order Pulmonata Family Physidae ..................... 37 Family Planorbidae .................. 38 Order Stylommatophora Family Urocoptidae .................. 39 Family Bulimulidae .................. 40 Class Pelecypoda .............................. 4O Phylum Chordata Class Osteichthyes Order Lepisosteiformes Family Lepisosteidae ................ 41 Order Amiiformes Family Amiidae ...................... 44 Order Siluriformes Family Ictaluridae .................. 45 Class Reptilia Order Chelonia (Testudines) Family Baenidae ..................... 46 Family Emydidae ..................... 48 Family Trionychidae ................. 53 Family Dermatemydidae ............... 54 Family Carettochelyidae ............. 56 Order Squamata Suborder Sauria (Lacertilia) Family Iguanidae .................... 58 Family Anguiidae .................... 59 Suborder Serpentes Family Boidae ....................... 63 vii Suborder Amphisbaenia .................. 65 Order Crocodilia Family Alligatoridae ................ 67 Family Crocodylidae ................. 69 Family Pristichampsidae ............. 71 Class Mammalia Infraclass Metatheria Order Marsupialia Family Didelphidae .................. 74 Infraclass Eutheria Order Insectivora Family Apatemyidae .................. 77 Family Pantolestidae ................ 77 Family Lepticidae ................... 78 Family Dormaaliidae ................. 81 Order Proprimates Family Paromomyidae ................. 85 Family Microsyopidae ................ 86 Order Primates Family Adapidae ..................... 93 Family Omomyidae ................... 104 Order Creodontidae Family Hyaenodontidae .............. 111 Order Carnivora Family Miacidae .................... 112 Family Viverravidae ................ 115 Order Condylartha Family Meniscotheriidae ............ 118 Family Hyopsodontidae .............. 120 Order Taeniodonta Family Stylinodontidae ............. 123 viii Order Tillodonta Family Esthonychidae ............... 125 Order Artiodactyla Family Dichobunidae ................ 127 Order Perissodactyla Family Equidae ..................... 130 Family Brontotheriidae ............. 135 Family Helaletidae ................. 139 Order Rodentia Family Sciuravidae ................. 146 Family Paramyidae .................. 151 Order Incertae sedis Family Metcheiromyidae ............. 156 Family Epoicotheriidae ............. 157 EOCENE BIOSTRATIGRAPHY ................................. 159 Wasatchian Land Mammal Age ........................ 160 Bridgerian Land Mammal Age ........................ 160 AGE AND CORRELATION OF THE LITTLE MUDDY-DESERTION POINT FAUNAS ........................................... 163 Little Muddy Local Fauna .......................... 165 Desertion Point Local Fauna ....................... 170 STRUCTURAL AND SEDIMENTARY HISTORY ..................... 178 PALEOENVIRONMENTS AND PALEOECOLOGY ..................... 186 Paleobotany and General Paleoecology .............. 187 Paleoecology of the Little Muddy local fauna ...... 188 Paleoecology of the Desertion Point local fauna...191 DISCUSSION AND SUMMARY ................................. 194 CONCLUSION ............................................. 203 APPENDIX ............................................... 205 LITERATURE CITED ............. I ......................... 233 1X Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Table 4a. 4b. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. - the Little Muddy-Desertion Point area. LIST OF TABLES Measurements (in mm.) of Marsupialia .......... 76 Measurements (in mm.) of Insectivora .......... 83 Measurements (in mm.) of Proprimates .......... 92 Measurements (in mm.) of Adapid Primates ..... 103 Measurements (in mm.) of Omomyid Primates....110 Measurements (in mm.) of Carnivora ........... 117 Measurements (in mm.) of Condylartha ......... 124 Measurements (in mm.) of Tillodontia ......... 127 Measurements (in mm.) of Artiodactyla ........ 129 Measurements (in mm.) of Perrisodactyla ...... 147 Measurements (in mm.) of Rodentia ............ 155 North American Early to Middle Eocene Continental Biostratigraphy. Ma indicates millions of years before present and is approximate .................................. 162 Chronologic ranges of mammalian taxa within The lines indicate the known stratigraphic range of each taxon, X's indicate the horizons within the study area from which species have been recovered, and ?'s denote questionable occurrences .................................. 163 Faunal list of the Little Muddy local fauna..165 Faunal List of the Desertion Point local fauna ........................................ 171 Table 15. Table 16. Percent composition of the Little Muddy local fauna. The minimum number of individuals is used in calculating the ordinal percentages. The number in parentheses indicates the total number of specimens .......................... 198 Percent composition of the Desertion Point local fauna. The minimum number of individuals is used in calculating the ordinal percentages. The number in parentheses indicates the total number of specimens .................................... 199 xi Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure 10. LIST OF FIGURES Map showing the Green River Basin of southwestern Wyoming and surrounding mountains ................................. 6 Location Map of study area ................ 7 Generalized stratigraphic column of the Desertion Point-Little Muddy area ......... 9 Map of study area showing localities and biostratigraphic zonations ............... 18 Epiplastra of Echmatggxs species from the study area. A. g. yxomingensis (UM 98717), B. E. sentaria (UM 101024) C. E. gigollensis (UM 101153). Bars are one millimeter in length ................. 52 Trunk vertebra of Calamagras primns (UM 101211). Bars are one millimeter in length ................................... 66 Crocodilian teeth. A. Allogggthgggghug (UM 100892). B. Diglocxgodon (UM 98577m). C. Qrocodzlus affinis (UM 101012m). D. ggiggiggggpggg vgrax (UM 98577m). Bars are one millimeter in length ............. 73 Palagictgps bigusnig. A. Occlusal View of /M2 (UM 101166) B. Buccal View of /M2 (UM 101166). Bars are one millimeter in length ................................... 8O Igggciug graybullianus. Occlusal view of M2/ (UM 101154). Bar is one millimeter in length ................................ 87 gaggius cf. Q. frugivorous. Occlusal view of /M3 (UM 101166). Bar is one millimeter in length ................................ 96 xii Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure 11. 12. l3. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. Notharctus robinsoni. Occlusal view of /M3 (UM 98576). Bar is one millimeter in length ................................... 96 Conelemur cf. g. australotutus. Occlusal view of /M2 (UM 101009). Bar is one millimeter in length ..................... 99 Omogxs carteri. Occlusal view of right dentary with /M2 and /M3 (UM 101038). Bar is one millimeter in length ......... 106 Anemornxsis near ;. wortmani. Occlusal View of /M1 (UM 101159). Bar is one millimeter in length .................... 106 Migcis latidens. Occlusal view of M1/ (UM 100028). Bar is one millimeter in length .................................. 113 Lambdotherigg,nopoggacium. A. Occlusal View of /P4 (UM 100891). B. Buccal View of /P4 (UM 100891). Bar is one millimeter in length .................... 137 §§1eneletes sp. indet. A. Occlusal view of left dentary with /M2 and /M3 (UM 94913). B. Buccal view of left dentary with /M2 and M/3 (UM 94913). Bars are one millimeter in length ....... 142 Correlation chart of lithostratigraphy, fossil vertebrate localities, faunal levels, and biostratigraphy. DPLF denotes Desertion Point local fauna, LMLF denotes Little Muddy local fauna...18l xiii LIST OF PLATES Plate I. Geologic map of Desertion Point—Little Muddy area, southwestern Green River Basin, Wyoming. Plate II. Correlation of measured stratigraphic sections within the Eocene Wastch, Green River and Bridger formations, Lincoln and Uinta counties, Wyoming. xiv USGS- USNM- YPM- AP- Tra- LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS Institutions: Pratt Museum, Amherst College American Museum of Natural History University of Michigan, Museum of paleontology United States Geological Survey United States National Museum University of Wyoming Yale Peabody Museum Measurements, Specimens and Localities: anteroposterior Tr- transverse transverse, anterior Trp— transverse, posterior lower tooth X/— upper tooth molar P— premolar canine I- incisor Bridger Basin *— measurement approximate specimen included in miscellaneous box INTRODUCTION Hundreds of early and middle Eocene vertebrate fossil localities have been reported from the Tertiary basins of Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico and Utah. In several of these, continuous depositional sequences spanning the early— middle Eocene boundary (Wasatchian—Bridgerian boundary) are known. Extensive faunas from these sequences have been reported in the Wind River and Huerfano basins (Guthrie, 1967; 1971; Robinson, 1966; Stucky, 1984a; 1984b) and less comprehensive faunas are known from the Washakie and Bighorn basins, (Gunnell g; al., 1992; Turnbull, 1978) and the northeastern Green River Basin (West, 1969; 1970; 1973). Although extensive faunas are known from southwestern wyoming where the type areas of both the Wasatchian and Bridgerian Land Mammal Ages are known (e.g. Gazin, 1952; 1962; Wood, 1966; Pledge, 1969; McGrew and Sullivan, 1970; Gunnell and Bartels, in press), faunas spanning the Wasatchian-Bridgerian (Lostcabinian-Gardnerbuttean subage) boundary in this area have not been extensively reported. A field research project was initiated by G.F. Gunnell in 1989 to investigate early Bridgerian vertebrate paleontology in the southwestern Green River Basin (Bridger 2 Basin). This field work not only tripled the previous collection of early Bridgerian fossils from the Bridger Basin (Gunnell and Bartels, in press), but, in 1992 a locality was discovered at the extreme western margin of this area, containing a small, but diagnostic, Wasatchian assemblage in the La Barge Member of the Wasatch Formation. Subsequent field work has shown that an essentially continuous transitional depositional sequence exists between the La Barge Member to the west through the lower Bridger Formation to the east. This study documents the vertebrate paleontology across the Wasatchian-Bridgerian boundary in this sequence, and delineates for the first time the Wasatchian-Bridgerian boundary within the vicinity of the type areas of these North American Land-Mammal Ages. The boundary is located considerably lower in the Wasatch Formation than previously reported (i.e. Grande, 1984, Sullivan, 1980). LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The study area is located in the southwestern corner of the Green River Basin, wyoming (Figure 1). It lies equidistant between the towns of Opal and Carter, spanning the Lincoln\Uinta county line (figure 2). The study area is on the eastern limb of a large, gently dipping, north to south-trending anticline. Many of the localities are therefore on the western faces of small buttes and long 3 escarpments. The localities are typically separated by broad, shallow, alluvium-filled valleys. In parts of the study area, especially the northern portion, outcrops are uncommon, the best ones being found along its eastern, western and southern margins. MATERIALS AND METHODS The fossils of this study were collected during the summers of 1989 through 1993 by joint University of Michigan/Albion College/California State University at Sacramento field parties. All fossils are accessioned at the University of Michigan Museum of Paleontology (UM). Most specimens were obtained by surface collecting. Although a large quantity of excellent specimens have been recovered over five seasons, most localities are actually unfossiliferous compared to the classic higher Bridger beds. Attempted screening for microvertebrates at several localities did not produce a significant number of vertebrate elements. A single locality, BB110, proved ideal for screening and produced many microvertebrates, including several taxa never before reported from the early Eocene of the Green River Basin. Fossils were identified by comparison with existing collections, and from descriptions in the literature. Detailed stratigraphic sections were measured in the study area to determine the precise relationships of the fossil 4 localities. These sections are presented as Plate 2, and along with aerial photos, were used in the construction of the detailed geologic map presented as Plate 1, and to reconstruct the depositional environments of the various units. PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS The Bridger Basin of southwestern Wyoming has been the focus of paleontological field investigation since the first fossils were discovered in the early 18503 (West, 1976, 1990). Most of these studies have focused on either the fishes of the predominantly lacustrine Green River Formation or the mammals of the predominantly fluvial Bridger Formation. Field investigations in the Bridger Formation have concentrated on the highly fossiliferous middle Bridger Beds in the southern part of the basin and have largely ignored the comparatively fossil—poor lower and upper parts of the Bridger Formation (Bridger A and E). West and Hutchinson (1981) were the first to describe mammalian fossils from the uppermost beds of the Bridger Formation (Bridger E), confirming that these strata are Bridgerian in age and that no rocks of Uintan age crop out in the southern part of the Green River Basin. Field workers from the University of Wyoming (Wood, 1966; Pledge, 1969; McGrew and Sullivan, 1970) were the first to report vertebrate fossils from the Bridgerian A Figure 1. Map showing the Green River Basin of southwestern Wyoming and surrounding mountains. 3.32.08 3-... In lulol.lu I lul.ll¢|. 0". ui||.IIl-II.|I|¢I|-lullu . I c 2}! 2.3.... 3.:- 8-2.: 33- .3333 «:1: 3::- 33. :3... .35 :3: 32- 23.3 1.00. 0236 an... 0 m>£ Figure 3 . Generalized stratigraphic column of the Desertion Point-Little Muddy area. 10 include beds in northeastern Utah and northwestern Colorado (Koenig, 1960). The formation reaches thicknesses exceeding 650 meters in the south-central part of the Bridger Basin (Sullivan, 1980). As noted above, Matthew (1909) separated the Bridger Formation into five units, Bridger A through E using a series of calcareous tuffs or "White Layers". Wood (1934), utilizing Matthew's marker beds, divided the formation into two members, the Blacks Fork Member (Bridger A and B), and the Twin Buttes Member (Bridger C and D). Although these terms are still in use by some authors as informal biostratigraphic units (i.e. West, 1973; McGrew and Sullivan, 1970), they have never received wide acceptance as lithostratigraphic units. Koenig (1960), using solely lithologic characteristics, suggested redividing the formation into lower, middle, and upper Bridger Formation. Koenig (1960) also subdivided the Lower Bridger into two units. The lowermost of these, the lower Bridger A, crops out within the study area. WHISKEY BUTTE BED Sullivan (1980), recognizing the need for revision of the lithostratigraphy of the Bridger Formation proposed the name Whiskey Butte Bed for a unit separated from the main body of the Bridger Formation by the Craven Creek Bed of the Laney Member of the Green River Formation. Within the field area, the Whiskey Butte Bed consists of light gray 11 mudstones, siltstones and litharenites. The Whiskey Butte Bed is a fluvial interval representing a regression of Lake Gosiute. It separates two tongues of the lacustrine Laney Member of the Green River Formation. The tongue of Bridger Formation present at the eastern end of the study area represents a more terrestrial interlude between two major transgressions of ancient Lake Gosiute. The Whiskey Butte Bed produces fossil vertebrates characteristic of the early Bridgerian (Bridgerian "A", Br1.2). WASATCH FORMATION The Wasatch Formation was described by F.V. Hayden (1873) for a sequence of brightly coloured fluviatile sandstones, conglomerates, and mudstones in Echo and Weber Canyons in northeastern Utah. Although the name Wasatch has been used for the early Eocene sediments of many of the intermontane basins of wyoming, Utah, and Colorado, it should be restricted to the greater Green River Basin (including the Washakie Basin and the type area in Utah; West, 1973). The formation crops out extensively within the study area, intertonguing with various units of the comparatively drab Green River Formation. LA BARGE MEMBER The La Barge Member conformably underlies the Fontanelle Tongue of the Green River Formation both in the type area (Oriel, 1962) and within the study area. It is comprised of brightly coloured mudstones, gray 12 sublitharenites, and thin, tan, micrite lenses. The La Barge Member is approximately 150 meters thick in the type area and up to 500 meters thick in the more central portions of the basin. The La Barge Member rests unconformably on the Lower Cretaceous Gannet Group. Extensive faulting immediately west of the study area makes the precise thickness of the unit difficult to ascertain. The La Barge Member produces vertebrate fossils indicative of a Lostcabinian subage (Wa7, latest early Eocene). NEW FORK TONGUE The New Fork Tongue was described by Donovan (1950) for a series of variegated mudstones and poorly sorted conglomerates and sandstones near the confluence of the Green and New Fork Rivers. Bradley (1964) extended the geographic range of the unit south to include most of the upper layers of the Wasatch Formation along the western margin of the Green River Formation. The term is used here to designate several thick, cross-bedded, litharenites and sublitharenites that intertongue with the Fontanelle Tongue of the Green River Formation. Vertebrate fossils have not been collected from the New Fork Tongue within the study area. UPPER MEMBER This paper follows M'Gonigle and Dover (1992) in referring to the upper strata of the Wasatch Formation as the Upper Member. Within the study area the Upper Member 13 consists of series of bright red, white, purple and gray mudstones with occasional, thick channel sandstones and several minor sheet sandstones. Sullivan (1980) named these layers the Desertion Point Member replacing the term "upper tongue of the Wasatch Formation" used by Oriel (1962, p. 2162—2164) and other previous workers. The type locality, as designated by Sullivan (1980, p.13) is "near Desertion Point (sec. 26, T. 19 N., R. 115 W.) and eastward to Little Muddy Creek in the Mulkay Spring Quadrangle. In this locality the member is about 250 feet (76 meters) in thickness". This is somewhat confusing since less than one meter of the Wasatch Formation crops out at the base of Desertion Point (see measured section 6, Plate 2). The strata exposed at Desertion Point are the lignites, shales, limestones and sandstones of the Laney Member of the Green River Formation (approximately 25 meters thick). The closest substantial outcrop of Wasatch Formation is approximately 3 kilometres southwest of Desertion Point. Within the study area the Upper Member of the Wasatch Formation consists of two units. The upper unit is marked by cycles of red, white, purple and gray mudstones and siltstones with occasional litharenitic channel sandstones. The lower unit consists of thick rust red mudstones and siltstones, with thin limestone and sandstone interbeds. The Upper Member produces vertebrate fossils indicative of the earliest Bridgerian (Gardnerbuttean, Br1.l). 14 GREEN RIVER FORMATION The Green River Formation was named by F.V. Hayden (1869) for a thick sequence of lacustrine sediments of early to middle Eocene age west of Rock Springs, Wyoming. The formation consists of light gray, tan, and brown oil shales, oolitic limestones, mudstones and litharenites. The thickness of the formation varies from only a few meters thick at the edges to up to 600 meters thick in the centre of the Green River Basin. Within the study area and throughout the Green River Basin, units of the Green River Formation intertongue with both the Wasatch and Bridger formations. The three units which crop out within the study area are the Fontanelle Tongue, the Wilkins Peak Member, and the Laney Member. FONTANELLE TONGUE The Fontanelle Tongue of the Green River Formation was named by Donovan (1950, p. 63-64) to designate a series of "alternating buff—brown sandstones and green and gray mudstones that conformably overlie the Knight Member of the Wasatch". The base of the Fontanelle Tongue is marked by a thick, yellow, ostracod and gastropod-rich micrite that fonms the cap of the prominent ridge that runs north-south along the western side of the study area. A thick series of poorly sorted, cross-bedded litharenites interpreted by M'Gonigle and Dover (1992) as part of the Wasatch Formation intertongues with the Fontanelle Tongue. The Fontanelle 15 Tongue conformably underlies the Wilkins Peak Member of the Green River Formation. WILKINS PEAK MEMBER Bradley (1959) introduced the name Wilkins Peak Member for strata in the Green River Basin that represent intermittent lacustrine beds deposited during a period of frequent vacillations in the level of Eocene Lake Gosiute. This regression gave rise to a greater abundance of evaporite minerals and carbonate rocks. Within the study area the Wilkins Peak Member consists of gray-green mudstones, thin, poorly sorted litharenites, and abundant, thin, algal limestones. This unit is conformably overlain by the Upper Member of the Wasatch Formation and conformably overlies the Fontanelle Tongue of the Green River Formation. A single specimen of Byzachygg collected near the base of this unit is indicative of earliest Bridgerian deposition (Gardnerbuttean, Br1.1). LANEY MEMBER The Laney Member was designated by Schultz (1920) for a thick sequence of tan marlstones, brown oil shales, gray mudstones and thin algal limestones in the Washakie Basin. Bradley (1959) extended the unit to include beds formally assigned to the Morrow Creek Member in the Green River Basin. The Laney Member is the thickest unit of the Green River Formation marking a major incursion of Eocene Lake Gosiute throughout the area (Sullivan, 1980, Roehler, 1992). 16 Sullivan (1980) separated the basal portion of the Laney Member into two distinct, laterally persistent tongues, the lower, which outcrops within the study area, he named the Craven Creek Bed. The upper unit which he named the Cow Hollow Bed outcrops east of the study area. These tongues are separated from each other by the more fluviatile strata of the Whiskey Butte Bed of the Bridger Formation, but merge basinward where Eocene Lake Gosiute attained greater depths (Sullivan, 1980). CRAVEN CREEK BED The boundary between the Craven Creek Bed and the Upper Member of the Wasatch Formation within the study area is marked by a thin, although laterally persistent, lignitic, tuffaceous mudstone. This bed contains abundant plant debris in the form of broken leaves, stems and carbonized wood. Above this the Craven Creek Bed consists of brown oil-shales, gray to tan calcareous silty mudstones, gray litharenites, occasional dark brown lignites and a few interbedded algal limestones. FOSSIL VERTEBRATE LOCALITIES Fossil vertebrates have been recovered from 31 localities within the study area. These localities are distributed throughout the Wasatch, Green River, and Bridger formations. There are four localities in the Whiskey Butte Bed of the Bridger Formation, twelve in the Craven Creek Bed 17 of the Laney Member of the Green River Formation, one in the Wilkens Peak Member of the Green River Formation, nine in the Upper Member of the Wasatch Formation, and five in the La Barge Member of the Wasatch Formation. Fossil vertebrates have not been collected from the Fontanelle Tongue of the Green River Formation and the New Fork Tongue of the Wasatch Formation within the study area. The geographic distribution of the fossil localities is shown in Figure 4. There is a general progression of older localities on the west to younger on the east. A brief description of each locality is provided below. The topographic quadrangles are all from the United States Geological Survey 7.5 minute series. LOCALITIES WASATCH FORMATION UPPER MEMBER B8013: Red, white, gray, and pink beds beneath the dark brown lignitic layer, at the base of Desertion Ridge, the low escarpment extending north from Desertion Point. Wl/2, SW1/4, Section 23, and NW1/4 NW1/4 Section 26, T. 19 N., R. 115 W., Lincoln County, Mulkay Springs Quadrangle. BBOl4: Low red buttes and flats northeast of large, red hill known as Big Dutch Butte. NE1/4, SW1/4, Section 18 RJIGW. ILIISW. 1220K 1119M. Bridget-Ian l l I I E33103 - : “WWI Wasatchian l (“.330 33037 I 33013 I ,3 I f l (7 “3°“ o33033 Lostcabinian . mm ‘ mm [nus : Gardnerbu1:tean \ ”3%: I 33075 fl‘em £331.16 I ”0'” v A '1" “’37 i Ell/5T3 1 2 33114 r 3 mm. "m i 3'1'1 I i run. I ””7 : @3117 33014- [1533013 ‘ ' | I m“ I Bridlgerian A : 310: l nos'v I l I Figure 4. Map of study area showing localities and biostratigraphic zonations. 19 4, T. 18 N., R. 115 W., Uinta County, Mulkay Springs Quadrangle. 88051: Three prominent red and white variegated buttes, 400m north of Dry Muddy Creek and 3.3km west of Little Round Mountain. SW1/4, SE1/4, Section 28 and NW1/4 NEl/4 Section 33 T. 20 N. R. 115 W., Lincoln County, Little Round Mountain Quadrangle. 88068: Red, white, gray, and pink beds beneath the dark brown lignitic layer, at base of Desertion Ridge. SEl/4, NW1/4, Section 23, T. 19 N., R. 115 W., Lincoln County, Mulkay Springs Quadrangle. BBO75: White, gray, and tan beds beneath the dark brown lignitic layer, at base of Desertion Point. SE1/4, SW1/4, Section 26, T. 19 N., R. 115 W., Lincoln County, Mulkay Springs Quadrangle. 88096: White flats and low buttes at the base of the northeast end of the long, low, multi-coloured hill known locally as Wasatch Butte, 2km north of Little Muddy Creek. SEl/4, Section 4, T.18 N., R. 115 W., Uinta County, Mulkay Springs Quadrangle. 88097: SWl/4, NE1/4, Section 9, T. 18 N., R. 115 W., Uinta County. Red, white, gray, and purple beds below prominent white layer, bottom half of the southeastern end of Wasatch Butte, 500m north of Little Muddy Creek, Uinta County, Mulkay Springs Quadrangle. 20 88103: White, gray, and pink beds outcropping along a small dry-wash, 2km west of northern end of Desertion Ridge. NEl/4, NW1/4, Section 22, T. 19. N., R. 115 W., Lincoln County, Mulkay Springs Quadrangle. 88104: Red, white, gray, and purple beds above the prominent white layer, top half of Wasatch Butte, 900m north of Little Muddy Creek. NW1/4, NEl/4, Section 9, T. 18 N., R. 115 W., Uinta County, Mulkay Springs Quadrangle. LA BARGE MEMBER 88110: White, gray, purple, and red flats, 900m west of Cumberland Ridge, 1.75km north of Little Muddy Creek. NEl/4, SW1/4, Section 34, T. 19 N., R. 116 W., Lincoln County, Cumberland Gap Quadrangle. 88114: White and purple mudstones, and gray litharenite at small exposure, 100m south of the long escarpment near the western margin of the study area known locally as Cumberland Ridge, 1.75km north of Little Muddy Creek. Centre of eastern boundary of Section 34, T. 19 N., R. 116 W., Lincoln County, Cumberland Gap Quadrangle. 88115: White, red, and orange mudstones at the base of the north face of Cumberland Ridge. SW1/4, SWl/4, Section 26, T.19 N., R. 116 W., Lincoln County, Mulkay Springs Quadrangle. 21 88116: Lowest units along prominent variegated ridge. Includes all units beneath the orange mudstone at the south western corner of the western extension of Cumberland Ridge. SW1/4, NEl/4, Section 34, T. 19 N., R. 116 W., Lincoln County, Cumberland Gap Quadrangle. 88118: Orange and yellow mudstones along the lower part of the western extension of Cumberland Ridge. SW1/4, NEl/4, Section 34, T .19 N., R. 116 W., Lincoln County, Cumberland Gap Quadrangle. BRIDGER FORMATION WHISKEY BUTTE BED 88035: Gray and white mudstones and litharenites of Top Hat Butte, a small hat-shaped hill on Desertion Ridge. NWl/4, SEl/4, Section 23, T. 19 N., R. 115 W., Lincoln County, Hampton Quadrangle. 88037: Gray and white beds on northeastern side of the long, low butte east of Top Hat Butte, top of Desertion Ridge. NEl/4, SE1/4, Section 23, T. 19 N., R. 115 W., Lincoln County, Hampton Quadrangle. 88038: Gray and white beds on southeastern side of the long, low butte east of Top Hat Butte, top of Desertion Ridge. NEl/4, SEl/4, Section 23, T. 19 N., R. 115 W., Lincoln County, Hampton Quadrangle. 22 88044: Gray and white beds on southwestern side of the long, low butte east of Top Hat Butte, top of Desertion Ridge. NW1/4, SEl/4, Section 23, T. 19 N., R. 115 W., Lincoln County, Hampton Quadrangle. GREEN RIVER FORMATION LANEY MEMBER, CRAVEN CREEK BED 88012: White, gray, and tan beds above the dark brown lignitic ash layer, top half of Desertion Point. SEl/4, SW1/4, Section 26, T. 19 N., R. 115 W., Lincoln County, Mulkay Springs Quadrangle. 88013w: Low gray, green, and white butte 300m west of base of Desertion Ridge. SEl/4, SEl/4, Section 22, and NEl/4, NEl/4, Section 27, T. 19 N., R. 115 W., Lincoln County, Mulkay Springs Quadrangle. 88019: Gray and white beds south of the broad dry wash at the south end of Desertion Ridge. NEl/4, NW1/4, Section 2, T. 18 N., R. 115 W., Uinta County, Hampton and Mulkay Springs Quadrangles. 88036: Tan, green, and gray beds above the dark brown lignitic layer, top half of Desertion Ridge. W1/2, SW1/4, Section 23, and NW1/4, NW1/4, Section 26, T. 19 N., R. 115 W., Lincoln County, Mulkay Springs Quadrangle. 23 88069: White, gray, and tan beds above the dark brown lignitic layer, top half of Desertion Ridge. SEl/4, NW1/4, Section 23, T. 19 N., R. 115 W., Lincoln County, Mulkay Springs Quadrangle. 88070: White, gray, and tan beds along Desertion Ridge. SEl/4, SW1/4, Section 26, T. 19 N., R. 115 W., Lincoln County, Mulkay Springs Quadrangle. 88072: White, gray, and tan beds 900m south of Little Muddy Creek. NEl/4, NW1/4, Section 14, T. 18 N., R. 115 W., Uinta County, Hampton and Mulkay Springs Quadrangles. 88074: Brown, tan, gray, and white beds at southeastern end of Desertion Ridge. SEl/4, SEl/14, Section 26, and NEl/4, NEl/4, Section 35, T. 19 N., R. 115 W., Lincoln County, Hampton Quadrangle. 88076: White, gray, and tan beds along Desertion Ridge. SEl/4, NWl/4, Section 26, T. 19 N., R. 115 W., Lincoln County, Mulkay Springs Quadrangle. 88077: Tan, gray, and white beds along northern face of butte south of the broad wash at the southern end of Desertion Ridge. SW1/4, SEl/4, Section 35, T. 19 N., R. 115 W., Lincoln County, and NE1/4, NW1/4, Section 2, T. 18 N., R. 115 W., Uinta County, Hampton and Mulkay Springs Quadrangles. 24 88098: Brown, tan, gray, and white beds at southwestern end of Desertion Ridge. SW1/4, NEl/4, Section 35, T. 19 N., R. 115 W., Lincoln County, Mulkay Springs Quadrangle. 88109: Tan, gray, and white beds along cliff 3.6km south of Little Muddy Creek. SW1/4, NW1/4, Section 23, T. 18 N., R. 115 W., Uinta County, Mulkay Springs Quadrangle. WILKENS PEAK MEMBER 88117: Gray mudstone immediately above the poorly sorted litharenite on the western side of prominent point. SEl/4, NEl/4, Section 1, T. 19 N., R. 116. W., Uinta County, Mulkay Springs Quadrangle. 25 FAUNAL LIST Kingdom Monera Division Cyanophyta stromatolitic cyanophytes Kingdom Animalia Phylum Arthropoda Class Crustacea Subclass Ostracoda Phylum Mollusca Class Gastropoda Order Mesogastropoda Family Viviparidae Vivingrug trochiformig Family Pleuroceridae Wm Order Basommatophora Family Physidae Physa bridgerensis Family Planorbidae Biggphlaria sp. Order Stylomatophora Family Uropcoptidae met 8. mi Family Bulimulidae Orggcgnug cf. 9. nlggisnirg Class Pelecypoda Ord., Fam., gen. et sp. indet. Phylum Chordata Class Osteichthyes Order Lepisosteiformes Family Lepisosteidae Lgnisosteus cunegtus Lepisogggug sp. indet. Order Amiiformes Family Amiidae Amie sp. indet. Order Siluriformes Family Ictaluridae genus and species indet. Class Reptilia Order Testudines Family Baenidae gaggg ergngsa 26 Family Emydidae Echmategys yxomingensis g. septaria Eghmategys cf. g. cibollensis Echmategys sp. indet. Family Trionychidae cf. Platxneltis sp. indet. Family Dermatemydidae Bantemys fluviatalig Bantemys sp. indet. Family Carettochelyidae Anogteira radulina Order Squamata Family Iguanidae Parasaurgmalus olseni Family Anguidae WW Xestops cf. 3. vagans Xestops sp. indet. Family Boidae Calamagras primug Indeterminate amphisbaenid Order Crocodilia Family Alligatoridae Alloggathosgghng sp. indet. Dinlocxnodon sp. indet. Family Crocodylidae Mamie new genus (?) and species Family Pristichampsidae Priggicgggpgug vorex Class Mammalia Infraclass Metatheria Order Marsupialia Family Didelphidae Pergghgrium inngmiggggg g. ggggtgcki Infraclass Eutheria Order Insectivora Family Apatemyidae cf. Apggggyg sp. indet. Family Pantolestidae Palaeosinong cf. g. 1353;911 Family Lepticidae galaeictopg bigugnig Family Dormaalidae WM 5. nrigcgg 27 Order Proprimates Family Paromomyidae Iggacius graxbullianns Family Microsyopidae Microsyops elegggg Microsxons cf. M. scogtianus Microsxons sp. indet. Order Primates Family Adapidae - Cantius cf. Q. frugivorous Notharctug ggbiggggi Conelemur cf g. ausgraloguggg gmilodecteg mcgrewi Smilodectes sp. indet. Family Omomyidae Queers 9111211 Omomys cf. 9. cgrtgri washakius insignia Anemorhxsis near 5. wortmani Order Creodontidae Family Hyaenodontidae genus and species indet. Order Carnivora Family Miacidae 811218 12111222 vulnavus profectus Family Viverravidae ‘viverrevus gracilis Viverravug sp. indet. Order Condylartha Family Meniscotheriidae Mgniscotherium chéggnse Meniscotherigg sp. indet. Family Hyopsodontidae Hyopsodus cf. g. minisgulug Hyopsodus cf. g. migiculus Hyopsodug cf. g. wortgégi Order Taeniodonta Family Stylinodontidae genus et sp. indet. Order Tillodontia Family Esthonychidae Egthonyg ggutidens Order Artiodactyla Family Dichobunidae 2112292115 gasses 211221211; sp. indet. 28 Order Perrisodactyla Family Equidae MM Orohippus sp. indet eracotherium vasacciense Family Brontotheriidae Lambdotherium.popoagacium Paleosyops cf. 2. fontinalis Family Helaletidae Hyrachygs modestus 22122212222 sp. indet. Order Rodentia Family Sciuravidae gciuravus nitidus Knightogys depregsus Family Paramyidae Parggys cf. g. excavatus Leptotomns narvug Lentotomus sp. indet. Order Incertae sedis Family Metacheiromyidae Metacheirogxs sp. indet. Pelaeanodon sp. indet. Family Epoicotheriidae Tgtrenagsalus sp. indet. 3“ 29 SYSTEMATIC PALEONTOLOGY The following is a discussion of the fossils found within the thesis study area. While all fossils recovered are described, special attention is given to the vertebrates, and in particular to the mammals. In all cases the locality is given along with the specimen description. A box labled "miscellaneous" has been retained for each locality containing invertebrates and isolated vertebrate bones and bone fragments not identifiable to the family level. The intention is to document the changes in the composition of the vertebrate community within the study area during the early middle Eocene. Measurements made with dial callipers calibrated to 0.1mm are presented where appropriate. Basic invertebrate classification follows the Treatise on Inyertebrate Paleontology (Moore, 1961). Gastropod classification follows that of Henderson (1935), Taylor and Sohl, (1962), and Hanley (1974). Non-mammalian vertebrates were classified according to Carroll (1988) and King and Burke (1989). Mammalian classification on the ordinal and familial levels follows Simpson (1945) and McKenna (1975). Mammalian classification, particularly that of extinct taxa, has undergone considerable revision in the last several decades however, so a variety of sources were used for more 3O jprecise classification of the mammals from the study area. These are referenced in the discussion of each individual taxon. The known chronological ranges of the mammals discussed below were obtained from Woodburne (1987), and if necessary, were updated from newer sources referenced in the discussion. North American Eocene biostratigraphy is discussed briefly in the section following systematic paleontology. (I) T (I: A- ‘h ‘ I §e4 I“- '§ ’4 I]: ‘L L' v.‘ 31 Kingdom Monera Linnaeus, 1758 Remarks: Kingdom Monera contains the earliest and simplest forms of life on earth. All members of this group, the bacteria and the cyanobacteria, are single—celled, prokaryotic organisms. Phylum Cyanophyta Steinke, 1931 Class indet. Remarks: Colonial algal structures known as stromatolites are ubiquitous in the limestone layers of the Laney and Wilkens Peak members of the Green River Formation. Although many authors use the term stromatolite to indicate strictly marine organisms, others use it in reference to any colonial algal structure (Awramik, 1990). The term as used here follows the usage of Surdam and Wray (1976) and indicates an organosedimentary structure formed by sediment trapping within microbial communities in either a marine or lacustrine setting. Fresh water stromatolites have long been known from the Green River Formation (Bradley, 1928; Surdam and Wray, 1976). Wood (1966) and Pledge (1969) reported large ellipsoidal algal pods, likely fresh water stromatolites from the low Bridger (Bridger A) beds northeast of the study area. Pledge (1969) reports that these algal pods developed on inundated stumps and fallen trees in the shallow water at the edge of Eocene Lake Gosiute. Grande (1984) reported algal pods (oncolites) that developed on the fossil ~a. r. .O~ vi 5‘ who 5. .‘l ‘h a flu 32 gastropod Gonigbasis tenera. Stromatolites have not been reported from the Wasatch Formation which consists primarily of terrigenous fluvial deposits. As indicated above Stromatolites are particularly well developed in the Laney Member along the Desertion Point escarpment, especially in two thin micritic limestones. Abundant intermittent stromatolite layers differentiates the Wilkens Peak Member from the underlying Fontanelle Tongue. In most cases the algal pods in the Laney Member form in concentric ellipsoidal structures that range in size from a few centimetres to a meter or more. Consistent with the observations of Pledge (1969), and Grande (1984) several of the smaller algal pods formed around gastropods, particularly gggigbggig, and many of the larger pods formed as encrustations around submerged logs. Unlike most of the stromatolites in the Laney Member, algal structures in the Wilkens Peak Member tend to be more stratiform constructions than concentric ellipsoids. Stromatolites and other related algal structures are useful indicators of environment. Stromatolites indicate the presence of photosynthesizing microbes which require abundant light, suggesting shallow water and the proximity of the shore (Bradley, 1928). Awramik (1990) argues that not only do stromatolites form in shallow water, they can actually form under intermittent conditions of submersion. 33 Stromatolites are also indicative of quiet, perhaps stagnant water and the absence of aquatic grazers (Awramik, 1990). Kingdom Animalia Linneaus, 1758 Phylum Arthropoda Siebold and Stannius, 1845 Subphylum Mandibulata Clairville, 1798 Class Crustacea Pennant, 1777 Subclass Ostracoda, Latrielle, 1806 Family indet. Remarks: Ostracods are common in limestone lenses in the Laney Member and Fontanelle Tongue of the Green River Formation, particularly in a thick gastropodal limestone on the western side of the study area. Swain (1964), Baer (1969), and Oriel and Tracey (1970) reported a large variety of ostracods from the lacustrine beds of the Green River Formation in both the Bridger and Fossil basins. The ostracods from the study area have not been studied in detail. Phylum Mollusca Linneaus, 1758 Snails and bivalve fragments are common within the study area. These taxa have not been studied in detail, however several taxa have been identified. Grande (1984) gives a brief synopsis of the Green River molluscan fauna. Although the overall diversity reported by Grande (1984) is ~a.. ‘v- Q.‘ .v we. 3., ~.. 5. L e \A‘ 34 lrbgher, the molluscs from the study area do not differ (greatly from those reported by Grande. Class Gastropoda Cuvier, 1797 Order Mesogastropoda Theile, 1925 Family Viviparidae Montfort, 1810 Genus Viviparus Montfort, 1810 Aga,aag Distribution: Cretaceous to recent of North .America, Africa, Europe, and Asia. Remarks: Extant members of the genus Viviparus have been found in a wide variety of environmental conditions. They are found in both lakes and rivers and in depths ranging from a few centimetres to nearly three meters. La Rocque (1960) felt that the presence of Viviparug is indicative only of an abundant food supply in the form of lower plants and decaying animal matter rather than a particular ecological niche. Viviparus requires clean, oxygenated water (Richardson, 1928), and is able to aestivate during drought (Hanley, 1974). Vivipagga Ergghifgrmis Meek and Hayden, 1856 Matarial: UM 98713m- complete shell, collected at 88073, June 28, 1991. UM 101101m- damaged shell, collected at 88110, August 5, 1993. Ramarka: UM 98713m is a large individual of 211122£2§ grgghifgrmis measuring 39mm in length and 35mm in width, UM 101101m is approximately half the size. Both shells are dextral and rather thin with abundant fine, closely spaced 35 growth lines. UM 98713m is somewhat ovaline in cross- section due to post-depositional deformation. Family Pleuroceridae Genus Goniobasis Lea, 1862 Aga aag Distribution: Cretaceous to recent of North America, Africa, Europe, and Asia. Remarks: Gastropods of the genus Goniobasis are one of the most common molluscan fossils found in the Eocene of western wyoming. Extant species of goniobasia are common throughout North America in a broad range of aquatic ecological niches. They are typically only found in permanent water situations (Hanley, 1974). Notably, some extant species show remarkable tolerance to fluctuations in environmental conditions such as salinity and turbidity (Goodrich, 1944). This is an important consideration in Eocene Lake Gosiute which fluctuated from fresh to very saline water at various times in its history (Surdam and Wolfbauer, 1975). aniggagia tanara Hall, 1845 Magarial: UM 95670m- shells of two individuals, collected at 88051, June 15, 1990. UM 98577m- four shells, collected at 88037, June 20, 1991. UM 98579m— three shells, collected at 88044, June 20, 1991. UM 100896m— two shells, collected at 88114, July 25, 1993. UM 101101m- 14 shells, collected at 88110, August 5, 1993. 36 Remarks: Goniobasis tenera is the most common gastropod collected within the study area, particularly within the Green River Formation Several layers in the thick basal limestone of the Fontanelle Tongue at the western edge of the field area are comprised predominantly of Q. tenera. Q. tagera specimens recovered from the study area display considerable morphological variation. La Rocque (1960), studying Q. tenera from the Flagstaff Formation (Late Palaeocene to Early Eocene) of central Utah, established that there were four main morphotypes (labled forms A-D) of Q. ganera that were for the most part, separated from each other stratigraphically. Although specimen UM 95670m.from the upper Wasatch Formation most closely resembles Form C of La Rocque (1960) there are some significant differences. The specimen has the well developed plications and prominent nodes on the centre of each whorl that Form C has but also possesses carinae over the entire body of each whorl similar to Form 8, rather than only on the base as in Form C. The specimens from the La Barge Member of the Wasatch Formation and the Fontanelle Tongue of the Green River Formation are smooth, without any type of plications or nodes, and with only subtle carinae. This is most similar to Form D of La Rocque (1960). The specimens from the Bridger Formation (UM 98577m, UM 98579m), do not have nodes, possess strong plications, and have carinae that cover the entire whorl, similar to Form B. 37 Similar to the specimens studied by La Rocque (1960) the three morphotypes come from stratigraphically distinct horizons and may indicate separate invasions of the species into the study area. Alternatively, the variance in morphotypes between the three formations may reflect the different habitats in which the units were deposited (Bartels, pers. comm.). Order Pulmonata Family Physidae Draparnaud, 1801 Genus £2122 Draparnaud, 1801 Aga aag Distribution: Pennsylvanian to Recent of North America, Europe, Asia, and Africa. Ramarka: Modern members of the genus ggzaa are considered among the "hardiest" of the freshwater molluscs (La Rocque, 1960). They are generally found in very shallow water. Phgaa in association with other pulmonate gastropods such as Bionhlaria may be indicative of the poorly drained marshy wetlands adjacent to Lake Gosiute (Hanley, 1977). Surdam and Wolfbauer (1975) note that the presence of ggxaa, a lung breathing gastropod indicates very shallow water and emergent vegetation. A single species of ggyaa has been found within the study area. £2222 briagerensig Meek 1872 Magerial: UM 98577m- single shell, collected at 88037, June 20, 1991. UM 98713m- complete shell, collected at 38 88073, June 28, 1991. UM 101103m— single shell, collected at 88118, August 5, 1993. Remarks: Consistent with specimens figured in Grande (1984), ggzaa bridgerensis from the study area are small, sinistral, pulmonate gastropods. They are smooth shelled with very fine, closely spaced growth lines. They are slightly oval in outline and have regularly increasing whorls. Family Planoribidae Hubendick, 1955 Genus Biogphlaria White, 1876 Aga aag Distribution: Cretaceous to recent of Europe, North America, Asia, and Africa. Biogphlaria sp. indet. Matarial: UM 95602m- two shells, collected at 88036, June 5, 1990. UM 98577m- single shell, collected at 88037, June 20, 1991. UM98688- single shell, collected at 88070, June 28, 1991. UM 98713m- six shells, collected at 88073, June 28, 1991. UM 101026m- two shells, collected at 88038, August 1, 1993. Remarks: Biogphlaria is a small, low-spired, thin- shelled pulmonate gastropod. As mentioned above Biggphlaria in association with 22122 is considered indicative of the lowlands contiguous to Lake Gosiute (Hanley, 1974). Order Stylommatophora Ramarka: Two genera of stylommatophoran gastropods, Bolggpira and Oragggnus, have been recovered from the 39 lowermost beds of the Wasatch Formation within the study area. Hanley (1976) attributed these molluscs to the hot, humid, forested, calcium-rich lowlands adjacent to Lake Gosiute. Family Urocoptidae Pilsbry, 1902 Genus Bolggpira Martens, 1860 Aga aag Distribution: Palaeocene to Recent of western North America. Bgloapira cf. Q. granaeri Cockerell, 1914 Material: UM 101101m— Single shell, collected at 88110, August 5, 1993. Remarks: Cockerell (1914) described the species from an incomplete shell approximately 10mm in length from the Palaeocene Torrejon Formation of New Mexico but did not designate a catalogue number for the type. Similar to the type, the solitary specimen referred to Bgloapira cf. Q. agaagaga is damaged and does not retain the aperture. UM 101101m.is identical to the photographs in Mckenna et a1 (1962) and Cockerell (1914). It consists of ten whorls increasing in width. The specimen is approximately the size and shape of a blowfly larva and was initially mistaken for one. The whorls are a single continuous ribbon, not the individual lamellae characteristic of fly larvae. Abundant minute growth lines are apparent under high magnification. 4O Extant Bolospira are found in hot, arid, calcium rich environments (Pilsbry, 1946). Gingerich (1989) considered Boloanira indicative of high, well-drained floodplains. Family Bulimulidae Zilch, 1959 Subfamily Oreohelcinae Pilsbry, 1946 Genus Oreoconus Taylor, 1962 Aga aag Distribution: Lower Eocene through lower Oligocene of western and central Wyoming. Type Specias: Oreocgnaa planispira Taylor, 1962 Oregconua cf. Q. planianire Hglgtype: USNM 647848- single shell, collected from the Bridger Formation at Tabernacle Butte, Wyoming (Br2). Magarial: UM 101101m- Single shell, collected at 88110, August 5, 1993. Remarks: Oreoconus planignira is a medium sized, conical shelled, terrestrial gastrOpod. The species is poorly known. It is considered diagnostic of a terrestrial habitat since most specimens have been collected in association with other terrestrial gastropods (McKenna a; a;., 1962; Hanley, 1974). Class Pelycepoda Goldfuss, 1820 Ord., Fam., Gen. et sp. indet. Magarial: UM 98733m- single valve, collected at 88012, June 29, 1991. Ramarka: Fragments of pelecypod valves are common at most localities along Desertion Point Ridge. A single 41 complete valve of an indeterminate pelecypod was collected within the study area. This specimen does not match the description of any pelecypod described by Grande (1984), La Rocque (1960) or Hanley (1976, 1977). Phylum Chordata Haeckal, 1874 Subphylum Vertebrata Linnaeus, 1758 Class Osteichthyes Muller, 1846 Fish remains in the form of isolated skeletal elements are ubiquitous in the upper beds of the study area, particularly in the Laney Member of the Green River Formation. The lower, more terrigenous beds rarely contain fish material. Most of these fish remains are indeterminate fragments of teleosts and the scales and vertebrae of Leniaoggeus and.Amia. Superorder Holostei Muller, 1846 Order LEPISOSTEIFORMES Hay, 1929 Family Lepisosteidae Cuvier, 1825 Genus Lepisosteus Lacepede, 1803 Aga agg Disgripugion: Lepisostega is known from the Late Cretaceous to Present. During the Cretaceous they were world—wide in distribution but today they are limited to North and Central America and Cuba. Using track analysis of the biogeographic distribution of the gar, Wiley (1976) gave a minimum age for the genus as middle Jurassic. 42 Type Species: Lepisosteus gavialis Jordan and Evermann, 1896. Lepispsteus cuneatus (Cope, 1878) Holotypa: AMNH P.2517- Complete fish with crushed skull, from an unknown locality in the Manti Beds of the Green River Formation, Utah. Material: UM 95602m- two parietals, collected at 88036, June 5, 1990. UM 98775m- four parietals and two dermopterotics, collected at 88069, June 30, 1991. UM 99659m- crushed skull including cleithra, basioccipital, part of the pterygoid, and a fragment of the opercular, collected at 88070, June 23, 1993. Remarka: 22212222222 cunaapas is present in most of the lacustrine and fluviatile deposits in the Eocene of North America. The various bones of the skull are covered by elongate enameloid tubercles. It differs from all extinct and extant species of Lapisogtepa with the exception of L. ppapppfi in having wide interconnecting enameloid ridges rather than thin discontinuous ridges on the parietals and dermopterotics (Wiley, 1976). L. cun a differs from.;. ppapppa in having a reduced number of thicker interconnecting ridges (Wiley, 1976). Lapigpppapa sp. indet. Maparial: Abundant vertebrae and scales have been recovered from the following localities: 88012, 88013, 88019, 88035, 88036, 88037, 88038, 88044, 88068, 88069, 43 88070, 88072, 88074, 88075, 88076, 88077, 88098, and 88109. A few isolated scales have been recovered from 88110, 88114, and 88118. Remarks: Lepisosteus, the gar, is known from three species in the Green River Formation (Grande, 1984). Lepispstaua cuneatus (see above) is the only species known from Green River deposits outside of Fossil Basin and has been recovered from the study area (see below). Modern gars prefer swamps, bayous, shallow sluggish pools, backwaters of rivers and streams, and occasionally brackish lagoons (Page and Burr, 1991). They are primitive fish, and along with the bowfin (see below) are the only non-tropical air- breathing fish (Moyle and Cech, 1982). Lapiapgpaaa is known from isolated vertebrae and scales from most localities on the eastern side of the study area, and from jaw fragments from several of these localities. Lepispsteps vertebrae are unique among fish in being procoelous rather than amphicoelous. This is thought to be related to the weight of the scaled armour the fish possess (Moyle and Cech, 1982). This armour protected gars from predation by everything except crocodilians (Grande, 1984). The thick ganoid scales that comprise this armour are easily identified by their elongate trapezoidal shape. The teeth are acrodont and needle-like. 44 Order Amioidea Huxley, 1861 Family Amiidae Cuvier, 1825 Genus Apia Linnaeus, 1766 Aga apg Distribution: Late Cretaceous to Present of North America and Europe. Type Species: Ania calva Linneaus, 1766. Apia sp. indet. Material: Abundant vertebrae and scales have been recovered from the following localities: 88012, 88013, 88019, 88035, 88036, 88037, 88038, 88044, 88068, 88069, 88070, 88072, 88074, 88075, 88076, BB077, 88098, and 88109. Remarks: Apia, the bowfin, is represented in the Green River Formation by two species, Amie ainpaansia and A. fragpaa. Both species are common throughout the formation. Along with the gar, bowfins are the only non-tropical air- breathing fish (Moyle and Cech, 1982). Modern bowfins are found in swamps, sloughs and shallow pools, usually near vegetation. The cycloid scales that comprise the armour of this primitive fish are easily identified by their rounded- off rectangular shape. The scales are usually slightly concave and are much thinner than those of the gar. Superorder Teleostei Owen, 1847 Order indet. Maparial: Abundant vertebrae, spines, ribs, and skull fragments have been recovered from the following localities: 45 88012, 88013, 88019, 88035, 88036, 88037, 88038, 88044, 88068, 88069, 88070, 88072, 88074, 88075, 88076, 88077, 88098, and 88109. Remarks: Although abundant teleost fossils have been recovered from the study area, they are, with the exception of the catfish spines described below, extremely fragmentary in nature. Most studies of the Green River fish fauna have been conducted in the richer strata of the Fossil and Uinta Basins. Grande (1984) reviewed the fish fauna of the Green River Formation. No new information on the teleosts of the Green River Formation can be added here. Order SILURIFORMES Family Ictaluridae Genus and species indet. Aga app Distripution: Palaeocene to Recent, North America. Maperial: UM 95600m- Base of dorsal spine, collected at 88013, June 29,1990. UM 98735m- Base of dorsal spine, collected at 88077, June 29, 1991. Remarka: Two genera and three species of ictalurid catfish have been reported from the Green River Formation (Grande, 1984). The only easily identified elements are the long serrated dorsal and pectoral spines. Ictalurids are probably more common than the identified fossils might 46 suggest since most other isolated skeletal elements of catfish look similar to those of other teleostean fish. Class Reptilia Laurenti, 1768 Subclass Anapsida Osborn, 1918 Order TESTUDINES Batsch, 1788 Suborder Cryptodira Cope, 1869 Ramarks: The remains of turtles are the most abundant tetrapod fossils within the study area. The majority of the specimens are fragmented carapaces and plastrons and are of limited use. Several excellent specimens have been recovered, however, largely consisting of complete carapaces and plastra. Few of these have any associated skeletal material and only a single fragmentary skull has been found. Superfamily Baenoidea Williams, 1950 Family Baenidae Cope, 1869 Subfamily Baeninae Williams, 1950 Genus Qaapa Leidy, 1870 Aga app Distribution: Early to late Eocene (Wasatchian to Uintan) of Wyoming and Utah. Typa Qpeciea: Baena aranpaa Leidy, 1870 22222 2292222 Leidy, 1870 leopypa: USNM 103- partial carapace, collected near the junction of the Big Sandy and Green Rivers, lowermost Bridger Formation (Brl). 47 Material: UM 98663-fragmentary skull, complete mandibles, fore and hind limb elements, carapace and plastron fragments, collected at 88013, June 28, 1991. UM 98690- Complete plastron and partial carapace of large adult, collected at 88069, June 28, 1991. UM 98714— carapace and plastron fragments with associated limb elements, collected at 88036, June 28, 1991. UM 98718- carapace and plastron fragments, collected at 88013, June 29, 1991. Ramarks: UM 98690 is a specimen of a relatively old turtle. All traces of the sutures between the various bones of the plastron are obliterated through co—ossification. No traces of the pattern of the epidermal covering remain. The other three specimens were much younger and smaller individuals and retain obscure suture lines. The plastron of Qaapa aranpse is comparatively blunt at both ends. The posterior margins of the xiphiplastra are rounded and only slightly concave. The vertebral scutes are wide and rectangular. The carapace fragments are moderately thick. The skull is short and wide. The mandibles are robust, and possess a deep groove on the medial surface. The condylus mandibularis is rectangular and concave unlike the tear drop shaped bone in the closely related Chiaparnpn (Gaffney, 1972). 48 Superfamily Testudinoidea Baur, 1893 Family Emydidae Lydekker, 1889 Genus Echmatepys Hay, 1906 Aga apg Distribution: Eocene (WaO—Ui2) of North America. H22 21022122: 2M2 222221212 Cope, 1873 Echmatepys septaria Cope, 1873 Holotype: The type is in the United States National Museum, and consists of carapace fragments and a complete plastron, collected in the Washakie Basin near South Bitter Creek, Wyoming. Matarial: UM 95598— Nearly complete plastron, most of the carapace, some postcrania including a large claw, collected at 88013 on June 4, 1990. UM 98717— complete plastron and nearly complete carapace, collected at 88076, June 29, 1991. UM 98693— Complete plastron, carapace fragments, collected at 88013w, June 28, 1991. UM 98722- partial plastron including right epiplastron, collected at 88074, June 29, 1991. UM 101024- right epiplastron, collected at 88037, August 1, 1993. UM 101028- right epiplastron, collected at 88036, August 1, 1993. Ramarka: Eghmapepya aepparie is the most common emydid turtle found within the field area. It differs from Q. pyppipgapaia (see below) in having a narrow epiplastron with distinct tubercles set near the medial suture, a thick margin, and a deep epiplastral trough (figure 5) and ’1 49 massive, medial bridge extensions on the hypoplastron. This turtle is indicative of lacustrine or near—lake fluvial environments (Bartels, 1993). Echmatapys pyomingensis Leidy, 1869 Holotype: The type is in the collection of the Academy of Natural Science, Philadeplhia, and consists of an isolated left epiplastron, collected in the Bridger Basin, near Fort Bridger, Wyoming. Material: UM 95602m- right xiphiplastron, collected at 88036, June 4, 1990. UM 98717— Complete carapace and plastron, collected at 88076, June 29, 1991. Remarks: Echmatapys pyominganais differs from.§. aaptaria above in having a wider epiplastron with indistinct tubercles more distant from the medial suture, a thin margin, and a comparatively wide, short, and shallow epiplastral trough (figure 5). Q. pyominganaia is considerably less common than E- saptaria within the field area. The turtle is restricted to fluvial environments (Bartels, 1993). Apppapapya cf. a. pipollanais (Cope, 1902) Holotype: USNM 2576- fragments of the plastron, collected from the Wasatch beds of New Mexico in the vicinity of the Gallinas River. Mapariai: UM 101153- carapace and plastron fragments including the epiplastron, collected by at 88097, August 5, 1993. 50 Remarks: This interesting species of Echmatepys is known from a single specimen within the study area. It is significantly different from the other two species of Qappapapya found within the study area. The tubercles on the epiplastra (Figure 5) are large, distinct and pointed, and set near the medial suture. The tubercle is much more pointed and elongate than in either A. saptaria or Q. pypminganaia. The ventral surface is indented beneath the tubercles unlike either of these species. The margin, although thin like in Q. septaria, extends the entire length of the short medial suture. Like many modern terrestrial forms, the carapace and plastron are thick. Echmatapys sp. indet. Maperial: UM 98668m- carapace and plastron fragments, collected at 88013, June 25, 1991. UM 98704m— carapace and plastron fragments, collected at 88072, June 28, 1991. UM 98714- Fragments of the carapace and plastron, some limb elements, collected at 88036, June 28, 1991. UM 98715- complete entoplastron, fragments of hyoplastron, and epiplastron, collected at 88070, June 29, 1991. UM 99635m— carapace and plastron fragments, collected at 88037, June 17, 1992. Ramarka: These specimens unfortunately do not retain any of the diagnostic characters which differentiate between Apppapapya pygmingangia and Q. aappapia. The thinner shell 51 Figure 5. Epiplastra of Echmatepys species from the study area. A. Q. pyomingenais (UM 98717), 8. Q. sepparia (UM 101024) C. Q. pibpllanaia (UM 101153). Bars are one millimeter in length. A. Emmm IN 98711: me E . C . Figure 5 53 eazil‘I "“‘lillulfl‘k NUWHWHW' «“0". ' llll Crocodilian teeth. A. Allpgpathoauchua (UM 100892). 8. Diplpcypodon (UM 98577m). C. Crocodylus effinis (UM 101012m). D. Bars are Pristicpappaus vprax (UM 98577m). one millimeter in length. 74 Class Mammalia Linneaus, 1758 Infraclass Metatheria Huxley, 1880 Order DIDELPHIMORPHIA Illiger, 1811 Superfamily Didelphoidea Gray, 1821 Family Didelphidae Gray, 1821 Subfamily Didelphinae Gray, 1821 Tribe Didelphini Crochet, 1979 Genus Peretherium, Aymard, 1850 Aga apa Distribution: Early Eocene (Wal) to late Oligocene (Arl) of western North America. Typa Spacies: Q. comstocki Cope, 1884 Peretherium comstpcki Cope, 1884 leotype: AMNH 4252- left dentary fragment with M/2- 1‘II’3, from an unreported locality in the "badlands of the Wind River, Wyoming" . I Maparial: UM 95611- left dentary fragment with /M1 IDJETeserved, collected at 88037, June 5, 1990. Ramarka: Parethariap mestpcki is by far the largest bIcarth American species of Parapherium. UM 95611 is ecauivalent in size to specimens of Q. conspogki from the Vtind River Formation measured by Krishtalka and Stucky (1983). Measurements of UM 95611 are provided in Table l. Consistent with their description, the tooth has a strong, although rather short, precingulum at the base of the protoconid, the largest of the cusps. The paraconid, the lowest of the trigonid cusps, is deflected anterodorsally. - 75 CPIleE: entoconid is large and conical and separated from the flat tabular hypoconulid by the entoconid notch, a gap in the postcristid. Peretherium innominetum Simpson, 1928 Holotype: AMNH 11493— Partial left dentary containing /Ml-/M3, collected at Millersville from the Lower Bridger E?c3c:nmation (Brl) in the Bridger Basin, Wyoming. Material: UM 95610- fragment of left dentary containing /1![]. and alveoli of /M2, collected at 88037, June 5, 1990. till. 99919- talonid of right Mx/, collected at 88109, July 21, 19 92. UM 101102- right M2/, collected at 88118, August 5, 3.5!93. Ramarks: Three specimens have been referred to a9 rethapium innominetum. UM 95610 comes from one of the hli1ghest localities in the section, while UM 101102 comes 153:?om.one of the lowest. UM 99919 was recovered from.one of t11:1e intermediate beds in the section. The teeth fall well below the size range of most EEEQQaQQapiap species including Q. cometocki, also known from IT—I‘ie study area (Table 1). The two exceptions are Q. kn_ighpi, and Q. innominetum. Similar to described specimens Of Q, innominapap and unlike those of Q. knighti (Krishtalka and Stucky, 1983), UM 95610 possesses a low, posteriorly projecting hypoconulid. The hypoconulid is separated by a deep groove from a large entoconid. The entoconid and hypoconid are tall and pointed resulting in a very deep 76 t:azJLonid basin, deeper than that exhibited in Q. knighti. E>j.sssindlar to the condition in Q. knighti (Krishtalka and Stucky, 1983), UM 101102 has a very distinct ectoflexus. UM 99919, although rather incomplete, is very similar to UM ].()214102. Previously Bown (1982) and Setoguchi (1973) allocated Pgrepharium innominetum to the genus Peredectes, a didelphid Qgeeraus well known from higher Bridger Beds. Krishtalka and £3t:11cky (1983) returned Q. innominatap to the genus Pgrapherium on the basis of the size of the entoconid of /M2 £11121 [M3, and the presence of a deep, wide notch between the entoconid and the hypoconulid (Krishtalka and Stucky, 1984) . TABLE 1 Measurements (in mm.) of Marsupialia Paraphariap Q. o ms cki Q. innpminatap . UM 95611 UM 99919 /M1 AP 2.7 1.9 Tra 1.3 0.8 Trp 1.5 0.7 UM 101102 M2/ AP 1.8 Tr 1.7 77 Infraclass Eutheria Huxley, 1880 Order INSECTIVORA Illiger, 1811 Suborder Proteutheria Romer, 1966 Superfamily Apatemyoidea Matthew, 1909 Family Apatemyidae Matthew, 1909 Apetapys Marsh, 1872 Aga apg Distribution: Late Palaeocene (Cfl) through ]_aat:e Eocene (Du) of North America Typa Species: Apapapya paiiaiaa Marsh, 1872 cf. Apetapys sp. indet. Material: UM 101022- right /I1, collected by at 88037, ZXngust 1, 1993. Remarka: Apatemyids, and Apetapys in particular are Ciklaracterized by enlarged lower incisors (Marsh, 1872; I”resetthew, 1915). Apapapya is the only apatemyid insectivore 13<52ported from the study area or adjacent strata. UM 101022 5‘53; somewhat smaller than the type of A. bellus measured by DIiEirsh (1872), and may belong to A” bellulua. Measurements C>1E specimen UM 101022 are provided in Table 2. Family Pantolestidae Cope, 1884 Genus Qaiaapaipppa Matthew, 1901 Aga apg Diapripation: Late Palaeocene (Ti4) to middle Eocene (Brl) of North America, and possibly the early Eocene of eastern Asia. Type Species: Palaeoainppa veterrime Matthew, 1901. 78 Peleeoainopa cf. Q. lutreola Matthew, 1918 Holotype: AMNH 15100- fragment of right dentary with ,/WJM2 and /M3, from the lower beds of the Willwood Formation 253.1t Elk Creek, Bighorn Basin, Wyoming. Material: UM 101155— right M2/ with abraded metastyle arid postcingulum, collected at 88110, August 5, 1993. Remarks: UM 101155 is characterized by its prominent 1;»2aarastyle wing, extending far out from the paracone. The precingulum is slight, and only extends from the lingual sstciie of the protocone to the paraconule. The metaconule is rueazaerly imperceptible. Although morphologically similar, the tooth is cc>xtesiderably smaller than specimens of Peleapsinope W and Q. inperpa figured in Bown and Schankler (1.5?132). The specimen is possibly referable to Q. iappapia luivaeaver this species is known from the lower dentition only (‘76111 valen, 1967). Measurements of specimen UM 101155 are Provided in Table 2. Family Lepticidae Gill, 1872 Subfamily Lepticinae Gill, 1872 Peleaiptopa Matthew, 1899 Aga apQ Dispribution: Early to late Eocene (Wa3-Ui2) of Wes tern North America . Type Qpecies: Peleeicpppa bigaapis (Cope, 1880) 79 Peleeictops bicuspis (Cope, 1880) Holotype: AMNH 4802- crushed skull and mandibles with nearly complete dentition, collected from the Lost Cabin beds (Wa7) of the Wind River Basin, Wyoming. Material: UM 101166— left /M2, collected at 88110, August 5, 1993. Remarks: UM 101166 (Figure 8) is the only leptictid identified from within the study area. Although the trigonid is wider than the talonid, the talonid basin is much larger and deeper than the trigonid basin. The hypoconulid extends posteriorly from the postcristid. The paraconid is centrally placed and projects farther anteriorly than in the closely related Peleaicpppg brngari. The paralophid descends quite low between the paraconid and the protoconid unlike the even ridge present in Q. bridgari. The tooth is considerably larger than specimens of Q. paapi-Qinarai reported by Jepsen (1930), and specimens of Q. pineyanaia reported by Gazin (1962) and Guthrie (1967). It is smaller than the few known specimens of Q. pulpipaspia reported by Guthrie (1971), and slightly smaller than the type of Q. prngari described by Simpson (1959). UM 101155 is similar in size and morphology to the smallest specimens of Q, pigaapia reported by Guthrie (1967). Measurements of specimen UM 101155 are provided in Table 2. 80 A. 8. Figure 8. Palaaictops bicuspis. A. Occlusal view of /M2 (UM 101166) B. Labial view of /M2 (UM 101166). Bar is one millimeter in length. 81 Suborder Erinaceota Van Valen, 1967 Superfamily Erinaceoidea Fischer von Waldheim, 1817 Family Dormaliidae Genus chnopagas McKenna and Simpson, 1959 Typa Species: Scenopegas edenensis (McGrew, 1959) Aga apQ Dispribution: Early to late Eocene (Wal—Uil) of North America. 2222212212! 222m; (McGrew, 1959) Holotype: AMNH 55685- fragment right mandible with /M1— /M3, collected from the Morrow Creek Member (Brl) of the Green River Formation, Eden Valley, Wyoming. Material: UM 101019- fragment of left dentary with /M2, collected at 88037, August 1, 1993. Remarks: McGrew (1959) originally referred Q. agapapaia to the genus Diacpaon. Later that same year and with material from the same area McKenna and Simpson (1959) described a new genus, Q. mcgrewi. In 1962, McKenna et a1 referred Q. aQanansis to the genus Qcanppegas recognizing the priority of Q. edenenais over Q. mcgrewi. Judging from the amount of wear, UM 101019 is a specimen of relatively old individual of Q. edenanaia. Consistent with the description of McGrew (1959), the trigonid is inclined forward and is slightly wider than the talonid. The trigonid basin is tiny compared to the large talonid. The ridge between the hypoconid and the base of the protoconid is quite prominent. The tooth is much larger 82 than specimens of Q. priscus measured by Robinson (1966). It is similar in size to the type of Q. edenensis (McGrew, 1959) and with specimens reported by Robinson (1966) and West (1973). Measurements of specimen UM 101019 are provided in Table 2. Qgenopegas priscus (Marsh, 1872) Holotype: YPM 15309- left dentary with /M2 and alveoli of /P4, /M1, and /M3, from the middle Eocene Bridger Formation (8r2) near the Henry's Fork River, Wyoming. Material: UM 95608- fragment of right dentary with /Ml—/M2, collected at 88037, June 5, 1990. UM 95609- fragment of left dentary with /P1-/P3, and both dental foramina, collected at 88037, June 5, 1990. Remarka: Robinson (1966) reassigned chpipharium priagua to the genus chnppegas based on its similarities to Q. agapapaia and its dissimilarity to Q. yaipp. Two specimens from the study area have been referred to 22222222222—2211'1 11- The two molars of UM 95608 are very nearly equal in size. On both teeth, the hypoconulid extends posteriorly from the postcristid. The trigonid and talonid of /M1 are approximately equal in size, while the trigonid is slightly narrower than the talonid in /M2. The trigonid is directed slightly anteriorly. Anterior premolars in Qaapppagaa have not been described for some species and are difficult to refer to a /P1 /P2 /P3 /M1 /M2 83 Table 2 Measurements (in mm.) of Insectivora Apetepys sp. indet. UM 101022 /I1 AP 1.6 Tr 1.2 Peleeosinope cf. Q. lutreole UM 101155 M2/ AP 2.4 Tr 4.6 Pelaeictops biguspis UM 101166 /M2 AP 2.8 Tra 1.9 Trp 1.7 cnoes Q. adenansis Q. prisgus UM 101019 UM 95609 AP - 0.7 Tr - 0.3 AP - 1.2 Tr — 0.4 AP - 1.1 Tr - 0.5 UM 95608 AP - 1.8 Tra - 1.5 Trp — 1.3 AP 2.1 1.6 Tra 1.7 1.2 Trp 1.4 1.1 84 particular form. UM 95609 falls well below the expected size range of Q. edenensis and is close to that of Q. priagas. The two specimens are consistent with specimens of Q. ppiaaaa and much smaller than specimens of Q. adenensis described by Robinson (1966) and West (1973). Measurements of specimens UM 95608 and UM 95609 are provided in Table 2. Insectivore indet. ' Material: UM 101014- left astragalus, collected at 88116, July 28, 1993. UM 101160— fragment of edentulous right dentary with alveoli of /P4-/M1, collected at 88110, August 5, 1993. UM 101161- fragment of right dentary with roots of /M1, collected at 88110, August 5, 1993. UM 101164- fragment of upper molar, collected at 88110, August 5, 1993. Order PROPRIMATES Gingerich, 1989 Suborder Plesiadapiformes Simons and Tattersall, 1972 Remarka: The plesiadapiforms are the earliest group of primate-like animals known. Although plesiadapiforms have traditionally been included in the Order Primates, the relationship of the plesiadapiform primates to early Eocene primates of modern aspect has always been somewhat conjectural. Gunnell (1989) established that plesiadapiforms are more closely related to plagiomenids (archaic denmopterans) than to true primates. Gingerich A. w. b.‘_' 85 (1989) proposed the name Proprimates to include two Superfamilies (Microsyopidae and Plesiadapoidea), separating them from the more advanced primates and recognizing that this is likely a paraphyletic grouping. Superfamily Plesiadapoidea Trouessart, 1879 Family Paromomyidae (Simpson, 1940) Tribe Paromomyini Simpson, 1940 Genus Igpecius Matthew and Granger, 1921 Aga apQ Distribution: Middle Palaeocene (T03) to late. Eocene (Ui2) of the Rocky Mountain Region of North America. Typa Qpapiaa: 12822182 fpagivorpas Matthew and Granger, 1921. Tapapiaa greybullienus Bown and Rose, 1976 Holotype: YPM 26004— fragment of right maxilla containing P4/ to M2/, lower Willwood formation, Big Horn County, wyoming. Maparial: UM 101154- right M2/, collected at 88110, August 5, 1993. Ramarka: UM 101154 (Figure 9) is identical in size to the type of Igpaciua greypallienus described and figured in Bown and Rose (1976). Similar to all of the specimens studied by Bown and Rose (1976) the posterolingual corner of the tooth is much less rounded than in T, giggiypppaa. Although the tip of the parastyle wing has been sheared off, it appears to have been larger than in the type of T. greybullienpa. In addition, the tooth possesses a more 86 developed lingual precingulum than the type. The tooth is slightly wider labially than lingually, giving it a less squared appearance than in the type. Although there are some minor morphological differences, they are not considered substantive enough to warrant allocation to a new species without the study of additional material. Measurements of specimen UM 101154 are provided in Table 3. Superfamily Microsyopoidea Osborn and Wortman, 1892 Family Microsyopidae Osborn and Wortman, 1892 Subfamily Microsyopinae Osborn and Wortman, 1892 Remarks: The upper cheek teeth of early microsyopines are characterized by the complete lack of a stylar shelf. The cusps of the cheek teeth are low, the talonid basin is comparatively deep. They typically have a single pair of enlarged upper and at least one pair of enlarged lower incisors. A small diastema, usually not exceeding the first cheek tooth in length, exists between the enlarged incisors and the cheek teeth. The incisors often display considerable wear on the medial surface, a product of a rather unique method of mastication (Gunnell, 1989) (see below). A single microsyopine incisor is generally considered sufficient for identification to the subfamily level. 87 F igure 9 . Igpacius graybullianus. Occlusal view of M2/ (UM 101154). ' length. Bar is one millimeter in Genus Microsyops Leidy, 1872 Age and Distribution: Known primarily from the early exnd middle Eocene of Wyoming, Colorado, and New Mexico. The sgenus is first known from the latest Palaeocene (Cf2) of the Bighorn Basin (Woodburne, 1987) and last known from a single specimen from the middle Eocene (Ui2) Friars Formation in California. Type Species: Microsyops elegans Marsh, 1871 Microsyops elegans Marsh, 1871 Holotype: YPM 11794- left dentary containing /P4-/M2, collected from lower Bridger beds, Bridger Basin, Wyoming. Specific locality data is unavailable. Material: UM 99843- Cranial material including a skull roof with parietals, frontals, the occipital complex, and i I ve Ea 3“ ~x~ 88 the right petrosal; a right maxilla including P4/, M1/, and the labial half of M2/; a right dentary including /P3 through /M1, sheared /I3, intermandibular suture, masseteric ft:se;.eesta, and mandibular condyle; fragments of a left dentary ir1<:::1_‘uding labial half of /P4, mental foramen, and the mandibular condyle. Several rib fragments fit the expected size range for microsyopids and may belong to the same lirlditi_cvidual as the cranium, collected at 88036, July 16, 1992 . UM 101032— left /M1, collected at 88013, August 1, 3.S>S>:3.. Remarks: Most specimens of pigpgaygpa aiagapa are from ltrlei lower Bridger beds (8r1-Br2) of southwestern wyoming (E353ialay, 1969). The /P4 of UM 99843 has a broad talonid has in and a centrally placed hypoconulid similar to W agoppianas, a. alagens, a. knightoagig, and to :LEitzer specimens of Q. lapidana, however, the measurements of /F*4 and /M1 fall considerably above the size range of Q. lfiksigapg. Additionally, the protoconid of both /P4 and /M1 ifloes not extend as high above the talonid as those of Specimens of Q. lepigana studied by Szalay (1969). The cheek teeth of UM 99843, particularly /M1, /M2, and /P3 fall well below the size range of Qigpgayppa agpppiapaa but are within the size range of both Q. elegana and Q. knighpansia. Gunnell (1989) indicates that these two species could be considered conspecific since only a few minor differences are present. Most importantly, UM 99843 appears 89 to have the more strongly dilambdodont upper molars of M. w, and has more slender mandibles than M. knightenais. The skull of Microsxons is known from three described specimens, two skulls and a skull fragment (Szalay, 1969, Gunnell, pers. com, 1992). Of these three specimens, only one , AMNH 55286 has the otic region intact. UM 99843 therefore comprises the most complete cranial material of M. eleggg known. Microsyopid postcranial osteology is even less well known. The only definite postcranial element of a microsyopid is a proximal tibia associated with upper teeth Of g. ESL-EM from the lower Bridger beds. UM 99843 includes several rib fragments that were found in close association with the teeth and skull fragments and fit the expected size range of microsyopids. Two metatarsals and a calcaneum were catalogued with the specimen but are not included here since they are much too large to have come from a microsyopid. Measurements of specimens UM 99843 and UM 101032 are provided in Table 3. Migrgsxons scattianus Cope, 1881 m: AMNH 4748- left mandible with /P4 and part of /M2 , Collected from the Lost Cabin Member of the Wind River FOrmation, Wind River Basin, Wyoming. W cf. M. scotgianaa Cope, 1881 Magarial: UM 100888— left dP4/, collected at BB114, July 25, 1993. 9O Remarks: UM 100888 is larger than P4/ in Microsygps knighaensig and Microsyops latidens and is slightly smaller than M. M described in Gunnell (1989) . This specimen is; tzentatively referred to M. scottianus, primarily on the 135155.jLs of size, since morphological variation in deciduous Ipxrealnmolars is not considered diagnostic. Measurements of UM 100888 are provided in Table 3. Microsxpps sp. indet. Material: UM 99636- Edentulous left mandible C>C)rlsisting of the ramus of the dentary from /I3 socket to /TE>ES socket; intermandibular symphysis present, collected at BBO74, June 18, 1992. UM 99720- Fragment of upper left <2]:Leeek.tooth.(probably P3/), collected at BBO74, June 29, 21:5’591. Ramarka: Although all of the teeth are broken off of tnfll 99636, enough of the socket and root exist to indicate the presence of an enlarged lower incisor, an important Ckléinracter in microsyopines. As is also characteristic of mit:harctini and established the tribe Copelemurini (see below) to distinguish the two monophyletic groups within the No tharctinae . Genus Cantius Simons, 1962 Aga ang Distribution: Early Eocene (WaO to Wa4, Neustrian) of Europe and North America. ,Iypa figagiaa: gantiag angalatus Cope, 1875 Ramarks: The early Eocene notharctine Qantius is the earliest known lemuriform primate (Rose, 1981, Rose and VW31J4 I ‘1. 98 of Notharctus robinsoni from the field area are presented in Table 4a. Tribe Copelemurini Beard, 1988 Genus Cogelemur Gingerich and Simons, 1977 Age and Distribution: Early Eocene (WaO-Wa7) of the Rocky Mountain region of North America. Type Species: Copelemur tutus (Cope, 1877) anelemnr australotutus Beard, 1988 Hglotypa: USNM 22261- left dentary with alveoli for P/l, fragment of P/2, and P/3-M/1, from the Wasatch Formation on the slopes of Fossil Butte, Fossil Basin, wyoming. Qgpalaga; cf. Q. australotutug Beard, 1988 Matarial: UM 100895- talonid of left /M3, collected at BB114, July 25, 1993. UM 101009- fragment of left dentary with alveoli for /M1, and associated left /M2, collected at BB116, July 29, 1993. Remarks: Qopalemur australotutug was only known from the type specimen. Beard (1988) provisionally referred USNM 411883, an isolated left M/2 to the species since it is of the appropriate size and is intermediate in morphology between Q, tgtga and Q. praetutgs. Similar to this tooth, UM 101009 (Figure 12) has a tiny mesoinferiorly displaced paraconid, and a distally placed entoconid. UM 101009 is less worn than the specimen described by Beard, preserving QO 4- A. E. Figure 12. Copelemur cf. Q. australotutus. A. Occlusal view of /M2 (UM 101009). B. Lingual view of /M2 (UM 101009). Bars are one millimeter in length. 100 the well developed paracristid and the labial cingulid. The tooth is significantly larger than the type of Q. praetutus described by Gingerich and Haskin (1977) and additional specimens reported by Beard (1988). It is much smaller than the neotype of Q. tutus figured in Beard (1988). Measurements of Copelemur cf. Q. australotutus from the study area are presented in Table 4a. Genus Smilodectes Wortman, 1903 5gp app Distribution: Middle Eocene (Brl—Br3) of North America. Iypa Species: gmilodectes gracilis Marsh, 1871 §milodecte§ mcgrewi Gingerich, 1979 Holptype: UW 5021- left mandible with /P3 to /M3, lower part of the Bridger Formation (Brl), near the junction of the Big Sandy and Green Rivers, Sweetwater County, Wyoming. Matarial: UM 95506, left dentary with /Ml-/M2, right dentary with posterior root of /M1 and base of /M2, collected at BBO37, June 5, 1990. Remarks: gmilogectes mcgrewi is the earliest species of gmilodacteg known. Although UM 95506 is close in size to other early and middle Bridgerian notharctines, it differs in dental morphology. The paraconids of both molars are reduced, unlike the large cuspule found in Qaptaag and flotharctpg. /M1 is more elongate, thinner, and less robust than in the specimen of Qppalapp; from the field area and in measurements in Beard (1988). q.‘ ..:s :u 101 The primary difference between Q. mcgrewi and the middle Bridgerian (Br2) Q. gracilis is the larger size of Q. mcgrgwi. Gingerich (1979) noted that the observed size range of the type sample of Q. mcgrewi is more than three standard deviations larger than the observed range of a sample of Q. gracilis from its type locality. UM 95506 fits well within the expected size range of Q. mcgrewi. UM 95506 was recovered well below the type locality of Q. mpgrewi and represents one of the oldest records of Qmilodectas yet identified. Measurements of specimen UM 95506 are presented in Table 4a. Qmilodectag sp. indet. Matarial: UM 98723— fragment of right dentary with broken P/4, sheared off M/l and P/3, and alveoli for P/l, P/2, and /C, intermandibular symphysis complete, collected at BB074, June 29, 1991. Remarks: Although the only tooth preserved with UM 98723 is damaged, enough remains of the specimen is to confidently assign it to Qmilodactea. The alveoli between the sheared /P3 and the alveolus for the enlarged canine indicate that both /P1 and /P2 were single rooted, whereas in uptpapptpg /P2 is double rooted (Gingerich, 1979; Robinson, 1957). In addition, while the mandibular rami of all species of upthargtua are at least partially fused, those of Qpalpgagtag are unfused (Gingerich, 1979). The mandibular symphysis of UM 98723 is unfused. Although UM 102 98723 is not identifiable to the specific level, the presence of Q. mcgrewi at the same stratigraphic interval (see below) makes it probable that the specimen belongs to this taxon. Notharctinae Indet. Material: UM 99631, right distal tibia, collected at B8014, June 20, 1992. UM 101025- left pisiform, collected at BB038, August 1, 1993. UM 101093- distal phalanx, collected at BB110, August 4, 1993. Remarks: The postcranial anatomy of notharctines is well-known, largely because of nearly complete specimens of the middle Eocene genera gothargtgs and Smilodectes. The postcranial anatomy of Notharctug and Qmilodectes do not differ greatly (Szalay and Delson, 1979). Rose and Walker (1984) found that the skeleton of the early Eocene Cantips is very similar to its descendant flothargtus. Only fragmentary postcranial remains are known of the early Eocene genera Palxppdps and Copelapar, however, enough has been found to suggest that they do not differ markedly from the other notharctines (Szalay and Delson, 1979). The skeleton of notharctine primates bears close resemblance to extant lemuriform genera such as Lemur and Lepilappr (Szalay and Delson, 1979; Rose, 1985). UM 99631 comes from an area and stratigraphic horizon where very few other fossils and no other notharctines have been found. The specimen fits the size range of all of the 103 TABLE 4a Measurements (in mm.) of Adapid Primates Qantius frugivorous Copelemnr australotutas UM 100021 UM 101009 M2/ AP 4.3 /M2 AP 4.6 Tr 6.7 Tra 3.6 UM 100026 Trp 3.8 M3/ AP 4.0 UM 100895 Tr 6.1 Ap - UM 100025 Tra 4.6 /Ml AP 4.8 Trp - Tra 3.4 Trp 3.5 Smilodectas mcgrewi UM 101162 /M2 AP 4.8* UM 95606 Tra 3.4* /M2 AP 4.4 Trp 3.7 Tra 3.3 UM 101096 Trp 3.6 /M3 AP 5.5 /M3 AP 5.4 Tra 3.0 Tra 3.8 Trp 2.4 Trp 4.1 gotharttus rabinaoni UM 95607 UM 95634 UM 99917 /P3 AP 4.1 - - Tr 3.2 - — /P4 AP — 5.1 5.2 Tr - 3.7 3.8 /M1 AP 5.5-5.9 5.6 - Tra 3.7-3.8 3.7 — Trp 4.2-4.3 4.1 - /M2 AP — 5.8 - Tra - 3.8 - Trp - 4.2 — UM 98576 /M3 AP 6.4 Tra 3.3 Trp 3 0 104 notharctine taxa identified from the study area. UM 101025 comes from one of the stratigraphically highest localities in the field area. Other faunal elements from this horizon indicate an early Bridgerian age making it likely that the specimen is representative of either Qmilodactes or HQELEEEEEE- UM 101093 comes from the lowest locality within the study area. Although only Cantius has been identified from this locality, both Copelemnr and Cantius have been found at this level. The small size of the specimen suggests that it may be referable to Cantius, but it could represent a small individual of Copelemnr. Infraorder Tarsiiformes Gregory, 1915 Family Omomyidae Gazin, 1958 Subfamily Omomyinae Trouesseart, 1879 Tribe Omomyini Trouesseart, 1879 Subtribe Omomyina Trousseart, 1879 Genus papaya Leidy, 1869 Iypa Qpagies: papaya cartari Leidy, 1869. 5gp aad Distribution: Early to middle Eocene (Brl—Ui2) of wyoming and Utah. papaya garteri Leidy, 1869 leptype: ANS 10335- ramus of right dentary with P3, P4, and M2 from the lower Bridger Beds (BR2), near Fort Bridger, Wyoming. 105 Material: UM 99658, fragment of right maxilla containing complete P3/ and M2/, lingual half of P4/, and labial half of M2/, Collected at BB070, June 23, 1992. Remarks: Although two of the teeth in UM 99658 have been damaged, the specimen is complete enough to assign it to p. carteri. Consistent with the diagnosis of Szalay (1976), the cingulum forms a continuous ridge around the molars and is particularly heavy on the lingual side. The hypocone of M1/ is less pronounced than in the diagram of Szalay (1976), probably due to the high degree of wear of UM 99658. P3/ has a very tall, robust paracone consistent with Szalay's diagnosis. Omoays aarteri is the largest species of papaya and the only one that matches the size of UM 99658. Measurements of specimen UM 99658 are presented in Table 4b. Omoaya cf. p. carteri Matarial: UM 101037- fragment of right mandible with /M2, /M3, and posterior root of /M1. Remarka: UM 101037 (Figure 13) is too large to be either papaya minutus or p. lloypi. Although it is similar in size and general morphology to p. carteri, there are several important differences. The most visible way in which it differs from p. cartari is in the smoother enamel of the talonid basins of /M2 and /M3, and the much shallower trigonid basin on /M2. UM 101037 was collected at the contact between the Wasatch and Bridger Formations (early 106 Figure 13. Omoays cf. p. carteri. Occlusal view of right dentary with /M2 and /M3 (UM 101038). Bar is one millimeter in length. Figure 14. Anemorhysis near a. wortmani. Occlusal view of /M1 (UM 101159). Bar is one millimeter in length. 107 Brl) and is one of the oldest identified specimen of papaya, possibly accounting for its less complex appearance. Measurements of Omoays carteri from the study area are presented in Table 4b. Tribe Washakini Szalay, 1976 Genus washakius Leidy, 1873 Typa Species: flaapataaa,iaaigaaa Leidy, 1873. App app Distribution: Middle to late Eocene (Brl—Uil) of North America. WBahakiua insigais Leidy, 1873 Holptype: ANS 10332— right dentary with M2 and M3, from the lower Bridger Formation (Bridger B), Bridger Basin, wyoming, Matarial: UM 98575— fragment of the right dentary containing /P3, roots of /P4, alveoli of /C and /P2, and mandibular symphysis, collected at BBO37, June 20, 1991. Raaarka: Consistent with Szalay's (1976) diagnosis of washakiaa inaiaais, /P3 of UM 98575 has a prominent parastyle. The anterior portion of the mandible is anteroposteriorly compressed with a vertically emplaced /C and /P2, not elongated with an anteriorly projecting /C and /P2 as in the omomyines. The mandibular symphysis is more vertical than in Omoaya parteri. The two alveoli anterior to /P3 are equal in size indicating similarly sized /C and /P2. Measurements of specimen UM 98575 are provided in Table 4b. 108 Subfamily Anaptomorphinae Cope, 1883 Tribe Trogolemurini Szalay, 1976 Genus Anemornysis Gazin, 1958 App app Distribution: Early to middle Eocene (Wa3—Br1) of North America. Typa Species: Anemornysis sublettensis Gazin, 1952 Anemorhysis wortmani Bown and Rose, 1984 Holotype: USGS 6554- right dentary with P/3-M/2, roots of I/l and M/3, and alveoli of I/2 and C, from Upper Willwood Formation (Wa6), Washakie County, Wyoming. Anaaprnysis near a. wortmani Bown and Rose, 1984 Matarial: UM 101159- right /Ml, collected at BB110, August 5, 1993. Ramarks: UM 101159 (Figure 14) differs from ABQEQELMEifi paarcei described by Gazin (1962) in being longer and thinner. It is longer and much more slender than A. applettanaia. Although similar in length to specimens of a. pattaaapai and a. aprtmani described by Bown and Rose (1987) and.Q. natronanais described by Beard et al. (1992), it is much thinner. The specimen has a better-developed buccal cingulum than the type of A- patteraoni figured in Bown and Rose (1984). The hypoconulid is better—developed and more posterior in position than in any of the described species of Anemoruyais. The talonid is much narrower than the trigonid and is more triangular in outline than in a” sab1ettanais (Szalay, 1976), A. paarpei (Gazin, 1962), A. 109 pattersoni (Bown and Rose, 1984) or a. natronensis (Beard et al., 1992). Although UM 101159 is similar in most respects to Q. aprtmani there are some critical differences and it is not definitely assignable to this taxon. Although this specimen may represent a new species of Anemorhysis, more material is needed before this can be established. Measurements of specimen UM 101159 are provided in Figure 4b. Omomyidae indet. Material: UM 101036- left /C, collected at BB074, August 1, 1993. UM 101110- fragment of right mandible with talonid of /M3, collected at BBO37, August 1, 1993. Ramarks: The canines of omomyids tend to be slightly reduced and have a slight cingulum. This tooth is similar in most omomyid genera and is therefore of little use in generic identification. While /M3 is generally a useful tooth in omomyid identification, the trigonid of UM 101110 has been sheared off and the talonid is very worn. Despite the fact that washakiua has been recovered from the same locality, the specimen fits the size range of several omomyid taxa and is not identifiable past the family level. washakius insigais P/3 P3/ P4/ M1/ M2/ UM 98575 AP 1.6 Tr 1.4 UM 99658 AP Tr AP Tr AP Tr AP Tr wNNNNNNN Measurements Omoays parteri (in mm.) 110 TABLE 4b of Omomyid Primates Anemorhysis sublettensis /M2 /M3 UM 101159 /M2 AP 1.9 Tra 1.1 Trp 1.4 UM 101037 AP 2.2 Tra 1.9 Trp 2.0 AP 2.4 Tra -l.8 Trp 1.5 111 Order CREODONTA Family Hyaenadontidae Genus et sp. indet. Material: UM 98991— left astragalus, collected at BB013W, June 28, 1991. UM 100022— left astragalus, collected at BB110, July 27, 1992. Remarks: UM 98991 is the astragalus of a very large hyaenadontid. It has a narrow trochlear tibial facet with a shallow groove, a narrow neck, and a robust, rounded capitulum. The fibular facet is long, pronounced, and prominent, and protrudes laterally from the body of the astragalus. The groove beneath and behind the trochlea containing the ventral astragalar foramen is rather narrow, and very deep. The specimen is considerably larger and the trochlear groove is not as deep as in Maaonya. The neck is somewhat more slender than that in figures of Sinppa in Matthew (1909), but is very similar in size. UM 100022 is the astragalus of a much smaller individual. Although part of the trochlear tibial facet is broken off, it appears that it was narrow with a very shallow groove. The neck is exceedingly short and the capitulum is unpronounced. The fibular facet is prominent but short and rectangular, and does not extend laterally from the main body of the astragalus. The groove beneath and behind the trochlea is shallow. There does not appear .- u- '0- Ln I (N 'U (U -.a 112 to have been a ventral astragalar foramen. The specimen is smaller than any described by Matthew (1909). Order CARNIVORA Vicq d'Azyr, 1792 Suborder Fissipedia von Waldheim, 1813 Family Miacidae Genus Miacis Cope, 1872 app app Distribution: Early Eocene (Wal) through early Oligocene (Chl) of North America. Eocene (Neustrian- Headonian) of Europe, and upper Eocene of Asia. Typa Species: Miacis parvivorus Cope, 1872. Miacis latidens Matthew, 1915 leotype: AMNH 14766— right dentary with /M2-/M3, and alveoli of /Pl-/M1, and part of left maxilla with M1/-M2/, collected from the Lost Cabin beds of the Wind River Basin. Material: UM 100028- right M1/, collected at BB110, July 27, 1992. Remarks: As is common of fossils from BB110, the lowest locality in the section, UM 100028 (Figure 15) shows signs of considerable abrasion and wear. The irregular pattern of nicks and scrapes, both on the sides and on the crown of the tooth indicate that most of this wear is due to transport. UM 100028 fits the size range of three early to middle Eocene species of Miaaia described in Matthew (1909, 1915), Gazin (1962) and Gingerich (1983), M. exigaaa, M. 113 parvivoroua, and M. latidens. The small cuspule on the lingual cingulum found on the molars of M. parvivorpus is absent on UM 100028. The lingual side of the tooth is wider and blunter, and the parastyle wing is blunter and does not extend as far posteriorly as that in M. exigaus, and.M. parvivorous. While UM 100028 has a slightly thicker lingual cingulum than the type specimen of M. latidena, it is identical in all other ways. Measurements of specimen UM 100028 are provided in Table 5. Figure 15. Miapia latidans. Occlusal view of M1/ (UM 100028). Bar is one millimeter in length. 114 Genus vulpavus Marsh, 1871 5gp app Distribution: Early to middle Eocene (Wa2-Br1) of North America. Iypa Species: vulpayas palustris Marsh, 1871 Malpavua prpfectus Matthew, 1909 Holotype: AMNH 12626- complete skull, both lower mandibles, complete fore and hind limbs, collected from the middle Bridger (Br2) at Grizzly Buttes, Wyoming. Material: UM 101100- upper left Ml/ with broken metastyle wing, collected at BB110, August 6, 1993. Remarks: Similar to the type specimen of MMLpayaa EélEELELE (Matthew, 1909), the metastyle wing of UM 101100 has been broken off. The specimen is approximately thirty percent smaller than the type of M: paluatris and twenty percent smaller than the type of 13 bargeri figured in Wortman (1901). In addition to being slightly larger than specimens of 11 Qanavus figured by Guthrie (1971), the specimen has a broader lingual cingulum on the parastyle wing, and a more prominent paraconule. Although the type consists of lower dentition, Gazin (1952) described.yz aaiaa as having teeth significantly smaller than those of M: papayaa and of the same approximate size as 13 australia. The specimen is larger and more slender anteroposteriorly than the type of y: ovataa described by Matthew (1909) The specimen is only slightly smaller than the type of Malpavua profaptua described and figured in Matthew (1909) 115 and has been referred to this species. Morphologically it is very similar to the type. The hypocone is large and located in a more posterior position than in other members of the genus. It continues into cingular ridges along the posterior side and the anterolingual portion of the tooth. The protocone is connected to a minuscule paraconule and an indistinct metaconule. Measurements of specimen UM 101100 are provided in Table 5. Family Viverravidae Genus Viverravus Marsh, 1872 Map app Distribution: Late Palaeocene (T15) through middle Eocene (Ui2) of North America. Problematic specimens from the upper Eocene (Headonian) of Europe, and lower Oligocene of Asia. Eypa Qpecias: Vivarravus gracilis Marsh, 1872 Vivarravua grapilia Marsh, 1872 leotype: Complete set of lower jaws, and a single upper molar. Collected from the lower Bridger beds (Br2) at Grizzly Buttes, Uinta County, Wyoming. Material: UM 101017- left Ml/, collected at BBO37, August 1, 1993. Remarks: In addition to being slightly larger, the lingual side of UM 101017 is thinner and less blunt, and the parastyle wing is less pronounced than in specimens of Vivarraypa minytus figured in Matthew (1909). It is less than half the size of the type of the lower Bridger 116 Viverravus sicarius figured in Matthew (1909) and reported by Robinson (1966). The specimen fits Robinson's (1966) description of Viverravus gracilis in having a well developed hypocone forming a broad cingular shelf, and in having a heavy anterior lingual cingulum. The anterior lingual cingulum is less developed and the hypocone is absent in Viverravus apataa. The specimen is slightly smaller than the closely allied'viverravus dawkinsianns. Measurements of specimen UM 101017 are provided in Table 5. Viverravus sp. indet. Material: UM 100023- anterior half of left P3/, collected at BB110, July 27, 1992. Remarks: UM 100023 is unfortunately not complete enough to assign specifically. The cusps are extremely high and sharp, with a ridge running down the medial section of the paracone towards the anterior cuspule. The anterior accessory cuspule is better developed than in the lower Bridgerian Viverravus sicarius. The tooth is too large to be M. araailia or y: dawkinsianus, and too small to be M: sicariua or M: acutus. It is most similar in size to M: minutaa described by Matthew (1909) or y; latpaus described by Gazin (1952) however the upper dentition of both these species is poorly known. Measurements of specimen UM 100023 are provided in Table 5. 117 Fissipedia indet. Material: UM 98775m, claw, collected at BB069, June 30, 1991. Remarks: Carnivores are rare in the higher beds within the study area. The two exceptions to this are UM 98775, a single claw, and UM 101017, a single viverravid tooth (see below). TABLE 5 Measurements (in mm.) of Carnivora _i_¢_§n a i ___latidens Vin—meme Deaf—aegis UM 100028 UM 101100 Ml/ AP 4.8 Ml/ AP 6.2 Tr 7.9 Tr 8.1 Vivarravus sp. indet. Vivarrayaa gracilis UM 100023 UM 101017 P3/ AP 4.8* Ml/ AP 4.8 Tr 2.2 tr 3.5 Order CONDYLARTHA Cope, 1881 Family Meniscotheriidae Cope 1882 Remarks: The Meniscotheriidae were highly specialized condylarths with precociously advanced dentitions. The cheek teeth are lophodont, and the molars are highly molariform (Gazin, 1965). Although the selenodont pattern of their cheek teeth resembles that of artiodactyls they are not implicated in the ancestry of any modern ungulate groups (Carroll, 1988). Found in various locations throughout the 118 North American west and in Europe, they are most abundant in the early Eocene of the San Juan and Green River Basins and adjacent areas. Subfamily Meniscotheriinae Cope, 1882 Genus Meniscotherium Cope, 1874 5gp app Distribution: Late Palaeocene to Early Eocene (Cf3-Wa7) of western North America, particularly the Rocky Mountain interior. Iypa Spacies: Meniscptherium chamense Cope, 1874 Remarks: The premolars of Meniscotheriaa are relatively molariform resulting in a tooth row comparatively homogenous in both size and shape. Both the upper and lower cheek teeth of Maniscotherium are characterized by a more selenodont occlusal surface than the molars of contemporaneous condylarths. Meniscotherium is the most distinctly herbivorous condylarth (Gazin, 1965). Gazin (1965) was the first to study Maniappthariaa in depth since Cope described the family in 1882. Gazin (1965) felt that of the five described species only three were valid. Gazin (1965) considered Meniscotherium aaaipingalatum.undefinable since it was based on a single deciduous lower premolar. Meniapothariaa.priscum.was synonomyzed with M. tapiactis since the development of the metastylid is variable, and this was the sole basis for the species. The three accepted species are M. ahampnaa, M. tapiactia, and M. appaataa. Although the types of the three 119 species of Maniscotherium come from widely separated areas, they are all known from the middle to late Wasatchian of the Green River Basin. Meniscotherium chamense Cope, 1874 Holotypa: AMNH 4425- portions of both lower mandibles with /P3—/M3 intact, San Jose Formation (Wa3—6) in the San Juan Basin, New Mexico. Material: UM 100027- right Ml/, right I3/, and right proximal radius, collected at BB110, July 27, 1992. Remarks: The incisor included with UM 100027 is a typical condylarthan incisor and of little help in identification. The proximal radius included with UM 100027 has a broken, slender shaft and a highly expanded, rather rectangular articular surface, consistent with the description of Gazin (1965). This is typical of all three species of Maniapptharium and is of little help in specific identification. The M1/ included with UM 100027 retains the characteristic unworn, high crescentic cusps associated with a younger individual. The tooth is longitudinally more slender than figures of M. appaataa.but similar to figures of M. tapiacitia and M. Qaaaaaaa in Gazin (1962, 1965). The tooth also has an anteroposteriorly compressed lingual portion similar to specimens of M. paaapaaa described by Gazin (1962). The tooth is much more slender transversely, and much less lophodont than Ml/ of M. ropaatum.illustrated by Gazin 120 (1965) and West (1973). Consistent with the condition of illustrated specimens of M. chamense in Gazin (1965) and by West (1973) the protoloph and metaloph of M1/ differ only slightly in size whereas the protoloph is a much smaller cusp than the metaloph in M1/ of Meniscotherium robustum. Although morphologically similar, UM 100027 is approximately 25% larger than M. tapiactia. The specimen is most similar in size and morphology to Meniscotharium ppaapaaa illustrated by Gazin (1965). Measurements of specimen UM 100027 are provided in Table 6. Maniscotherium sp. indet. Matarial: UM 100894- several fragmentary teeth, collected at BB114, July 25, 1993. Remarks: The teeth of specimen UM 100894 display the high degree of selenodonty characteristic of Meniappthariaa, however none of the fragments are complete enough to make a specific assignation. Family Hyopsodontidae Trouessart, 1879 Subfamily Hyopsodontinae Trouessart, 1879 Genus Hyppaodus Leidy, 1870 gap app Diatribution: Early to late Eocene (Cf3-Du) of western North America. ,Iypa Qpepies: Qyppappaa paulaa Leidy, 1870. Remarks: Although Hyopsodpa is one of the most common mammalian genera in the Eocene deposits of Wyoming, and while it is particularly common in the higher Bridger beds, 121 it is represented by only five specimens from within the study area. Although four of these were collected at a single locality, BB110, the lowest locality within the study area, differences in size (Table 6) indicate that two species are present. The fifth comes from considerably higher up in the section, but still from within the Wasatch Formation. McGrew and Sullivan (1970), working in slightly younger units adjacent to the study area, reported only a single specimen of Hyopsodus. The phylogenetic relationships of Hyopapdua species have proven difficult to define. Gazin (1968) was the first to study Hyopspdus in depth. He found that, although known from abundant specimens, the various species are difficult to separate on the basis of dental morphology. There is very little difference in tooth structure between early specimens of Hyppspdus and later ones. Matthew (1909) noted that while the teeth of the various Bridger species show little advance over the Wasatch or Wind River species, there is a trend towards more complex premolar crowns and more crowded tooth roots. Gazin (1968) did not observe this increasing complexity, noting only that the P2/ of the Bridger specimens looks more like the P3/ of the Wasatchian specimens, and the P3/ of the Bridger looks like the P4/ of the Wasatchian. He did find that later Eocene (Uintan) specimens trend towards more lophodont molars. This trend, however, is not observed in early or middle Eocene 122 specimens. As a result, the various species of Wasatchian and Bridgerian Hyopsodus are virtually indistinguishable from each other except for size. (West, 1973, 1979, Gazin, 1968). Hyopsodus minisculus Cope, 1874 Holotype: ANS 10259- left maxilla with M1/ to M3/, collected from the Blacks Fork Member of the Bridger Formation (Br2), near Fort Bridger, Wyoming. ayppaoaus cf. Q. minisculus Cope, 1874 Material: UM 98665- fragment of left dentary containing /M2 and the roots of /M1, collected at BB013, June 25, 1991. Remarka: As mentioned above size is considered the best criterion for differentiating species of Qyppappaa. The specimen was compared to five early to middle Eocene species of Hyppsppua in Gazin (1952; 1962; 1968), Matthew (1909, 1915) and West (1973). Based on size the specimens are referred to Byppsopaa minisculus. Measurements of specimen UM 98665 are provided in Table 6. Qyppappaa mitipalaa Cope, 1874 Holotype: USNM- left ramus of mandible with /M1 to /M3, type missing since before 1907, "Wasatchian early Eocene, San Jose Formation, San Juan Basin, New Mexico." Qyppappaa cf. Q. miticulus Matarial: UM 100020- right /P4, collected at BB110, July 27, 1992. UM 100030- left /M1, collected at BB110, July 27, 1992. e . I, " TIM ‘ m 123 Remarks: Two specimens fell well under the size range of Hyppspdua‘wortmani and best fit the size range of the Wasatchian species Q. miticulus. Measurements of specimens UM 100020 and UM 100030 are provided in Table 6. Hyopaodua wortmani Osborn, 1902 Holotype: AM 4716- portions of both maxillae, premaxillae, and both rami of mandible with I2/, P3/-M3/, and /P3-/M3 represented, collected from the late Wasatchian of the Wind River Basin, wyoming. Hyopsppas cf. Q.wortmani Osborn, 1902 Material: UM 101150- labial half of right M2/, collected at BBll4 (wash), August 5, 1993. UM 101156- right M2/, collected at BB110 (wash), August 19, 1993. UM 101157- right /M1 collected at BB110 (wash), August 19, 1993. Remarks: Three specimens of Qyppappaa from the lowest two localities within the field area fell well below the size range of Q. miniapulus and best fit the size range of Q. apataaaa. Measurements of specimens UM 101156 and UM 101157 are provided in Table 6. Order TAENIODONTIA Cope, 1876 Family Stylinodontidae Marsh, 1875 Ramarka: Stylinodonts were among the most highly specialized mammals of the Early Cenozoic. Features such as rootless, ever-growing teeth, and large well—developed claws Mpniapptherium chamense I3/ Ml/ /P4 Measurements UM 100027 AP 2.7 Tr 3.9 AP 11.5 Tr 6.3 UM 100020 AP 3.9 Tr 2.5 124 TABLE 6 (in mm.) of Condylartha UM 101156 M2/ AP 3.2 Tr 4.3 UM 101157 /Ml AP 3.1 Tra 2.0 Trp 2.3 Hyopsodus miticulus UM 100030 /M1 AP 3.4 Tra 2.5 Trp 2.7 Hyopsodus minisculus /M2 UM 98665 AP 3.5 Tra 2.6 Trp 2.8 Hyopsodus wortmani 125 suggest the animals dug their food, probably roots, from the ground. The phylogenetic relationships of stylinodonts remain somewhat conjectural. Stylinodontidae, gen. et sp. indet. Material: UM 99844m- Right terminal phalanx, probably from the pes, tip broken off, collected at BB036, July 16, 1992. Remarks: UM 99844m is the only record of a stylinodont from within the study area. The specimen is a large, robust claw 30.3mm in length, and 12.5mm in width at the proximal end, and is similar to the description and photograph of the undetermined stylinodont described by Gazin (1952). It tapers towards the distal end of which approximately 5mm is broken off. The articular surface is broad and deep, within only a slight keel. Although Qtylinodon is the only known genus of stylinodont known from the middle Eocene of the Green River Basin, not enough material is present to definitively assign the specimen past the level of family. Order TILLODONTIA Marsh, 1875 Family Esthonychidae Cope, 1883 Subfamily Esthonychinae Zittel and Schossler, 1911 Remarks: Subfamily Esthonychinae differs from other esthonychids by its large second lower incisor with enamel only on the anterior, labial, and lingual sides. 126 Genus Esthonya Cope, 1874 Iypa Species: Esthonya bisulcatus Cope, 1874 gap app Distribution: Late Palaeocene (Cfl) through early middle Eocene (Brl) of North America and Asia, and early Eocene of Europe (Sparnacian or Cuisan). Esthonya acatidens Cope, 1881 Holotype: AMNH 4807- left /M1 and /M2, collected from the Lost Cabin beds (Wa7) of the Wind River Basin, Wyoming. Material: UM 100896- bone and tooth fragments including lower right /Il, posterior half of lower left /P4, lingual half of lower left /M2, collected at BB115, July 25, 1993. Remarks: UM 100896 represents an older individual of Eathpnyg. All three teeth are worn down. Although the specimen is similar in size to three species of Esthpnyg, only one species, Eathonya acutidens, has been reported from the Green River Basin. Fragments of the lower mandibles associated with the teeth indicate that the mandibular rami were likely fused, consistent with the diagnosis of the Esthpnya apatularia - Q. piaulcatus — p.5cutidens lineage given by Gingerich and Gunnell (1979). The /M2 of UM 100896 is approximately 30% larger than the type of Esthonya apatulaaia. The /Il of UM 100896, although well worn, is much thicker than that of Eathonya pisulcatua figured in Gazin (1953). Although the anterior half of /P4 is missing, the tooth is complete enough to show that it is much larger than either Qatapaya apatularia or a. piaulpatia, and 127 slightly larger than the type of Q. acutidens. All three teeth are similar in size to specimens of Esthonyy acutidens measured by Stucky and Krishtalka (1983). Measurements of specimen UM 100896 are provided in Table 7. TABLE 7 Measurements (in mm.) of Tillodontia Esthonya acutidens. UM 100896 /Il AP 3.2 Tr 3.6 /P4 Ap - Tr 6.3 /M2 AP 8.8 Tra 6.8 Trp - Order ARTIODACTYLA Owen, 1848 Suborder Bunodonta Kowalevsky, 1873 Family Diacodexeidae (Gazin, 1955) Subfamily Diacodexeinae Gazin, 1955 Genus Diacodexis Cope, 1882 Map app Distribution: Early to middle Eocene (Wal-Br3) of western North America, early Eocene of Europe. Iypa Species: Diacpdaaia secana Cope, 1881 Diacodexia secana Cope, 1881 Map app Diatribution: Early to middle Eocene (WaO-Br2) of western North America. 128 Material: UM 100024— left /P4, collected at BB110, July 27, 1992. UM 101092- left /P3, collected at BB110, August 4, 1993. Remarks: The premolars of lower Eocene artiodactyls are not highly distinctive teeth. UM 100024 and UM 101092 are relatively low cusped and rather worn teeth. The specimens agree well in both size and morphology with specimens of Diacodexis secans described by Krishtalka and Stucky (1985, 1986), and Robinson (1966). The paraconid of both teeth is a small, but distinct, cuspule on the anterior side of the protoconid. In both cases the protoconid is the major cusp and is well separated from the hypoconid. Both UM 100024 and UM 101092 fall well below the size range of Baapphoaas (Stucky and Krishtalka, 1990) and well above that of Diacodaais chacensis (Robinson, 1966; Sinclair 1914). Although both teeth are similar in size to specimens of Antiappdpn pygaaaaa measured by West (1973, 1984) and Robinson (1966), they differ in other aspects. Most significantly, both specimens lack the distinct metaconid seen in specimens of a. pygaaaaa from the Bridger Basin (West, 1984). Measurements of specimens UM 100024 and UM 101092 are provided in Table 8. Diacodexia sp. indet. Matarial: UM 101099 left astragalus, collected at BBllO, August 5, 1993. 129 Remarks: All artiodactyls recovered from the study area have been referred to the genus Diacodexis, the most primitive known artiodactyl. Diacodexis is considered to be ancestral to all other artiodactyls and many of the features that characterize modern artiodactyls are already present (Krishtalka and Stucky, 1985; Carroll, 1988). The most important of these features is the unique double—trochleated arrangement of the astragalus. While the general pattern of the astragalus of Diacodexis is reminiscent of primitive condylarths there are some large morphological and functional differences (Schaeffer, 1947). The astragalus of Diapodexis is more slender and less robust than those of contemporaneous artiodactyls of similar size (Rose, 1982, 1985). Specimen UM 101099 was compared to specimens and diagrams of all comparably-sized lower and middle Eocene artiodactyls and fits the description of Rose (1982, 1985). TABLE 8 Measurements (in mm.) of Artiodactyla Diapodexis aecana UM 100024 UM 101092 /P4 AP 4.9 /P3 AP 5.3 Tr 2.5 Tr 2.8 130 Order PERISSODACTYLA Owen, 1848 Suborder Hippomorpha Wood, 1937 Superfamily Equoidea Gray, 1821 Family Equidae Gray, 1821 Genus Orohippus Marsh, 1872 App app Distribution: Middle Eocene (Brl-Br2) of western north America, primarily the Green River Basin Eypp Species: Orohippus pumilas Marsh, 1871 Orphippua paailus Marsh, 1871 Holotype: YPM 11336— fragment of the right maxilla with P3/ to M2/ and roots of P1/ and P2/, from the Bridger Formation at Marsh's Fork Wyoming (Br2). cf. Orphippua paailua Marsh, 1871 Matprial: UM 94980- left dentary with /P3 and /M1, roots of /P2, /M2, and /M3, collected at BB019, June 29, 1989. Remarks: Of the five species of Orohippaa, only two, p. paailus and p. aaipa have been found in the early Bridgerian (Brl). UM 94980 fits well within the size range of papaippaa paaiApa and is much smaller than p. majpr (Kitts, 1957). Although the specimen is of comparable size with Hyaacpthariaa'vasaccianae, known from the lower units of the study area, /P3 appears to have a minuscule entoconid, a feature not found in anapptpaaiaa. The tooth is slightly abraded in the area around the entoconid making this feature difficult to discern. Kitts (1957) considered p. paaAAaa to 131 be the direct descendant of Hyracotherium vasacciense and the progenitor of all other species of Orohippus. Measurements of specimen UM 94980 are provided in Table 9. Orohippus sp. indet. Material: UM 98727— right astragalus, collected at BB075, June 29, 1991. Remarks: The astragali of Orohippas and all subsequent equids are differentiated from Hyracotherium by having trochlear crests inclined at an angle, rather than parallel to the long axis of the foot (Kitts, 1957). In addition, the medial trochlear crest extends to the navicular facet. In Hyaappthprium.the neck is slightly longer and the medial trochlear crest does not touch the navicular facet (Gunnell, pers. comm.). The navicular facet of UM 98727 is central in position beneath the main body of the astragalus rather than medially emplaced as in diagrams of Eyaapptheriaa.in Radinsky (1966a) and Kitts (1956). Genus Hyaacpthpriaa.0wen, 1840 App app Diatributipn: Early to middle Eocene (WaO—Wa7) of Europe and North America. Iypp Species: Hyaacotheriaa leporinpa Owen, 1840 Rpmarka: Early Eocene equid systematics have undergone substantial revision since the first specimen of anapptMpaiaa.was found in 1838. Granger (1908) revised the genus Hyaapptheriaa, recognizing eleven species. Kitts (1956), with substantially more material, recognized three 132 North American species. Although he did not formally study any European specimens, he felt that specific separation of these from North American specimens would be difficult. Wortman (1896) synonymized Hyaacotherium.vasaccienap, Q.;apaa, Q. cuspidataa, Q. venticolaa and Q. anpastidpns. Kitts (1956) revised this, separating Q. vasacciensp and Q. papa; into one species (Q. vasacciense), and the remainder into a second (Q. anpastidpns), largely on the basis of stratigraphic position. The types of the Q. vaaappipnaa group are all from the late Wasatchian of southwestern Wyoming, those of the Q. aapastidens group are from various early Wasatchian localities in Wyoming and adjacent states. Rather than separate these animals into a larger number of formal species, Kitts used the term."subspecies" to distinguish groups of specimens with overlapping morphological characters. This thesis follows the classification of Kitts (1956). Hyaapptharium.vaaappienaa (Cope, 1872) leotypp: AMNH 4658- left M/2, from the lower Eocene Knight Formation, near Evanston, Wyoming. Material: UM 100890— right /M3, left /M3, right M2/, and associated tooth fragments, collected at BB114, July 25, 1993. UM 101158- upper Mx/, collected at BB110 (wash), August 5, 1993. Remarks: All of the teeth that comprise specimen UM 100890, with the exception the left /M3, are damaged to some 133 extent. The diagnosis of the specimen therefore is based primarily on this tooth. The heel is slender and elongate, unlike the short structure found in Drohippus. The tooth is broader than in Q. anpastidens and its synonyms reported by Kitts (1956). Hyracotherium vasacciense is most easily differentiated from.Q. craspedotum by its much smaller size. The specimen is substantially smaller than specimens of Q. craspedotaa.reported by Kitts (1956) and Guthrie (1971), and figured by Gazin (1962). Contrary to Kitts (1956), Guthrie (1971) recognized Q. index as a valid species, independent from.Q. vasacpipnae. Specimen UM 100890 is substantially larger than the single specimen of Q. iappa reported by Guthrie (1971). Specimen UM 100890 is closest in size to specimens of Hyaacotherium.y. vasappiense from the La Barge sample described by Kitts (1956). Measurements of specimen UM 100890 are provided in Table 9. Equidae, gen. et sp. indet. Material: UM 98666- fragment of right Mx/, possibly M2, collected at BB013, June 25, 1991. UM 98656- postcranial material including a left distal femur, left and right distal tibiae, a right humeral head, seven caudal vertebrae, three distal metacarpals, and a left calcaneum, collected at BB013, June 25, 1991. Remarks: Two closely related genera of equids are known from the early and middle Eocene of Wyoming. Kitts (1956, 1957) studied both Orphippaa and Hypnpptharium in 134 depth and observed that, in many respects, the postcranial anatomy of the two genera is similar. Certain bones, particularly those of the pes, have proven useful for identification (see above). With additional study it may become apparent that it is easier to separate early specimens of Orohippus from late specimens of Hyaacptheriaa using the shape and orientation of certain of the hind limb elements than with the dentition. The most commonly used criterion in separating the two is morphology of the teeth. Orohippas is considered to be the Bridgerian successor to Hyaacpthpriaa (Kitts, 1956; 1957) As the two genera are considered to be members of an evolutionary continuum, the critical dental characteristics may vary considerably. UM 98666 is a portion of an upper right cheek tooth, probably an M2/. The criteria used by Kitts (1956, 1957) to differentiate the two genera are absent on this specimen. UM 98656 fits the size range of both early Eocene equids, Hyaacothpriaa and prohippus, and likely belongs to one of these two genera. The distal tibiae fit perfectly with both Hyraaotheriaa and Orohippus astragali in the University of Michigan collection. Although the specimen falls within the size range of QaApaaAptpa there are several morphological differences. The astragalar groove of the tibia is deeper than that of a distal tibia found associated with Qalanplptea material from the same locality. In addition the 135 bone is more rounded in cross section than the homologous bone in Selenaletps. Superfamily Brontotherioidea Hay, 1902 Family Brontotheriidae Marsh, 1873 Subfamily Lambdotheriinae Osborn Genus Lambdothprium Cope, 1889 App app distribution: Early Eocene (Wa4-Wa7) of North America. ,gypp Specips: Lambdotherium.popoapacium (Cope, 1880) Lambdotherium.popoapacium (Cope, 1880) Holotype: Right P/4-M/3, from the Lostcabinian of the Wind River Basin, wyoming. Material: UM 100891— associated teeth including left /P2, left /P4, right /M1, left P4/, and left M1/, collected at BB114, July 25, 1993. Remarka: Bonillas (1936) synonymized all other described species with Lambdotherium.popoapacium. Prior to this the main criterion for specific separation was the degree of molarization of the premolars. All described species occurred within a narrow stratigraphic interval and most graded one into another without any clear divisions. Previous to this revision, a complete dentition belonging to a single individual had never been described, and it became clear that the upper and lower dentition of the specimen Bonillas studied (CIT 1743) had characters of several different species. 136 UM 100891 (Figure 16) is similar in all aspects to the specimen described by Bonillas (1936) and specimens figured by Osborn (1929). The /P2 is a rather simple tooth, and is very worn making the cusp pattern difficult to discern. The /P4 is a high-cusped tooth and is almost completely molariform. While a true entoconid is absent, the posterior cingulum is thick and pronounced. Osborn (1929) using progressive molarization of the lower premolars, considered Laappotherium.popoapacium to be the intermediate species in an evolutionary continuum. Based on the lower premolars, UM 100891 fits the description of Lambdotherium popapacium of both Osborn (1929), and Bonillas (1936). Although the ectoloph has been damaged, M1/ is easily identified as a molar of Laappotherium.popoapacium. A thin low cingulum encircles the crown. The four main cusps are approximately equal in height. The protoconule, although smaller than the other cusps, is rather large, and consistent with Bonillas' description, is crescentic, its base curling slightly around the base of the enlarged paracone. Measurements of specimen UM 100891 are provided in Table 9. Subfamily Palaeosyopinae Steinman and Doderlein, 1890 Genus Palaeosyoas Leidy, 1870 App app Distribution: Middle Eocene (Brl—Br3) of North America. Early Eocene of Asia. Figure 16. Lambdotherium popoagacium. A. Occlusal view of /P4 (UM 100891). B. Labial view of /P4 (UM 100891). Bar is one millimeter in length. 138 ,gypp Species: Palaeosyops paludosus Leidy, 1870. Palaeosyops fontinalis Leidy, 1870 Holotype: AMNH 5107- fragmentary skull including the left nasal, both squamosals, both parietals and right maxilla containing dP4/, M1/ and M/2, collected from the lower Bridger formation (Brl), near the confluence of the Big Sandy and Green Rivers, central Green River basin, Wyoming. Palaeosyops cf. g. fontinalis Leidy, 1870 Matprial: UM 98732— trigonid of left /dP4, collected at BB012, June 29, 1991. UM 99815- fragments of Mx/, collected at BBO96, July 15, 1992. Remarks: Palaeosypps fontinalia and Eotitanpps poraalis are the only two large brontotheres known from the Early and Middle Eocene of the Green River Basin. QaAaapayppa is likely derived from Eotitanops (West, 1973). Gazin (1952) considered Palaeosyops and Eptitanppa congeneric. Although their teeth are morphologically similar, West (1973) and Robinson (1966) consider them two distinct genera, based primarily on their substantial difference in size. Based on size, UM 98732 is referred to gaAappayppa QpatiaaAia rather than the smaller EQELEQQQEE bpraalia. Gazin (1952) noted that the deciduous teeth of paappatpaaiaa, a taxon closely related to Palaepsyppa, are identical except for size to their permanent counterparts. 139 The trigonid of UM 98732, a deciduous premolar is preserved in its entirety, and is slightly larger than any permanent /P4 of Q. fpntiaalia measured by Robinson (1966), and is far larger than /P4 of Eotitanops borealis. Although the specimen is fragmentary, the size of UM 98732 is also indicative of Palaeoayops cf. 2. fontiaalia. Measurements of QaAappayppa cf. a. fontinalis from the study area are provided in Table 9. Suborder Ceratomorpha Wood, 1937 Superfamily Tapiroidea Gill, 1872 Family Helaletidae Osborn, 1892 Genus QpAaaaAataa Radinsky, 1966 App app Distribution: Middle Eocene (Gardnerbuttean, early Brl) of wyoming. Few specimens of QplaaaAatpa have been described. To date, all described specimens have been lower cheek teeth. Locality and stratigraphy data is poor for the holotype and the hypodigm described by Radinsky (1966b). The holotype and two other specimens were found in a drawer of Bighorn Basin specimens in a box containing Qpptpppa palpipaAaa, a species known only from the Lysitean and Lostcabinian (Wa6-7) (Radinsky, 1966b). Guthrie (1971) reported QpAaaaAptpa from the Lost Cabin Member of the Wind River Formation but did not indicate which horizon his specimens came from. Stucky (1984a) restricted QalpaaAataa apppapaa to the gaAappayppa ppraalis zone (Gardnerbuttean, early Brl) within the Wind River Basin. Specimens of 140 Qplenalptps from the study area are the first specimens reported from outside of the Wind River Basin. gypp Qpecies: Selenaletes scppaeus Radinsky, 1966. Selenaletes sp. indet. Material: UM 94877- edentulous left mandible, collected at BB013, June 25, 1989. UM 94913— left dentary with /M2 and /M3, fragments of right dentary containing roots of /P2 through /M3, right distal tibia, collected at BB013, June 25, 1989. UM 95597— right dentary with /M2, collected at BB013, June 4, 1990. UM 98661- left M3/, collected at BB013, June 25, 1991. Remarks: Selanaletes scopaeua, the only described species of Qelpna1etpa, is one of the smallest known helaletid ceratomorphs. Morphologically it is very similar to many other helaletids known from the late Wasatchian and early Bridgerian of the Bridger Basin. Aside from minor differences in individual tooth shape, the most important distinguishing characteristic between the forms is size. Teeth of Selenaletea are approximately 30% smaller than those of prtodpn palcicalaa, the smallest species of prtopon, and 20% smaller than Dilophoppn Apptaa_a, the smallest species of Dilpphpppn (Radinsky, 1963, 1966b). Emry (1989, 1990) recently described a tiny helaletid ceratomorph from the Bridgerian of the Elderberry Canyon Local Fauna in Nevada. Teeth of this animal, Ppuphia pAypaaaa, are approximately 10% smaller than those of |In I... 141 Selenaletas scopaeus. Fouchia elyensis is the smallest known ceratomorph. The teeth of Selenaletes have slightly higher crowns, and more advanced bilophodonty than those of Fpachia (Emry, 1990). In Selenaletes the anteroposterior length of /M3 is less than that of /M2 yielding a /M2:/M3 ratio of 1.0 (Radinsky, 1966b). In Fouchia the length of /M3 is longer than that of /M2 yielding a /M2:/M3 ratio of 0.85 (Emry, 1990). The Bridger specimens, and in particular UM 94913 (Figure 17) follow the trend in Fouphia rather than that in Qaleaaletes with a /M2:/M3 ratio of 0.80 in specimen UM 94913 and 0.89 in UM 95597 (/M3 alveolar length). These specimens may well occupy an intermediate position between Fpuchia and Qelenalptes since the relative smaller size of /M3 is considered a diagnostic character in Qelenalatea apppapaa (Radinsky, 1966b). The specimens from the study area are likely representative of a new species of this poorly known genus. Measurements of specimens of QpAaaaAptpa from the study area are presented in Table 9. Subfamily Hyrachyinae Osborn, 1892 Remarks: This study follows the classification of Radinsky (1967). Radinsky removed the family Hyrachyidae from Superfamily Rhinocerotoidea, and placed it as a subfamily in Superfamily Tapiroidea, Family Helaletidae. Genus anachyas Leidy, 1871 App app Diatribution: Middle Eocene (Brl—Ui2) of North America and Europe. 142 Figure 17. Qalenplatas sp. indet. A. Occlusal View of left dentary with /M2 and /M3 (UM 94913). B. Labial view of left dentary with /M2 and M/3 (UM 94913). bar is one millimeter in length. 143 Iypp Species: Hyrachyas modestus Leidy, 1871. Remarks: Myaapayaa is one of the most common mammalian genera in the middle Eocene of western North America. Radinsky (1967) was the first to study the hyrachyids in depth since Wood's monograph in 1934, where 12 species in four genera of hyrachyids were recognized. Seven of these species (four from the Bridger Formation) were placed in the genus Hyaachyas. Wood (1934) separated these into three lineages or evolutionary grades, primarily on the basis of size. Radinsky (1967), utilizing a much larger sample reduced the number of genera to one and the number of species to two. Radinsky (1967) concurred with Wood (1934) that size is the only useful criterion for separating Bridgerian species of anappypa. Measurements of specimens of anapayaa from the study area are presented in Table 9. minis. 101133133 (Leidy, 1871) Holotype: USNM 661- isolated dP3/ or dP4/ from the lower Bridger Formation (Br2) of the Bridger Basin of wyoming. There is some dispute about the type specimen since Leidy (1871) originally designated this specimen as the type of Lpphiodpn modestaa and described the genus anapaypa the same year, based on another specimen. Wood (1934) and Radinsky (1967) concur that USNM 661 is the proper type specimen. 144 Material: UM 95635- cheek tooth fragments, collected at BB044, June 9, 1990. UM 98734- fragments of right maxilla containing P2/-P3/, M2/, fragments of M3/, and the roots of Il/ to I3/, collected at BB077, June 29, 1991. UM 101023- associated postcranial elements including left astragalus, left calcaneum, and left patella, collected at BBO37, August 1, 1993. UM 101035— associated postcranial elements including left navicular, left ectocuneiform, and the distal end of the left second metatarsal, collected at BB074, August 1, 1993. UM 101075— fragmentary left dentary including part of the descending ramus, and /M3, isolated /P3, left astragalus, collected at BB117, August 3, 1993. Remarks: UM 95635 is assigned to Hyaachyps on the basis of the large folded lophs of enamel characteristic of the species. The only other animal of the similar size is the brontothere Palaeosyops. The enamel folds of UM 95635 are considerably higher, sharper and tighter than are those of Palaapayops. As mentioned above, size is considered the only valid criterion for separating species of Hyaachyas. Consistent with Wood's (1934) diagnosis of Hyaaphyps, the protoloph of P2/ and P3/ of UM 98734 is considerably more robust and prominent than is the metaloph. The ectoloph and metaloph are connected by a ridge that is only slightly lower than the cusps themselves, whereas the protoloph is separated from the metaloph and the ectoloph by a deep depression. 145 Although UM 98734 is larger than most specimens of Q. modestus described by Radinsky (1967). Radinsky did report three exceptionally large B. modestus specimens from lower Bridger beds, and West (1973) reported a comparably large specimen of Q. modestus from the New Fork Tongue of the Wasatch Formation. Radinsky felt that size difference does not warrant the recognition of two species of early Bridgerian Hyaachyas. As more specimens of Hyrachyas are discovered from late Wasatchian and early Bridgerian deposits it may become apparent a second species is present. Specimen UM 101075 is a very large specimen of anapayaa mopestus, It is larger than any specimens reported by Robinson (1966) from the upper Huerfano Formation (Brl), by Radinsky (1967) from the Bridger B through D beds (Br2- Br3), or the single specimen from the Lost Cabin Member reported by Guthrie (1971). Measurements of specimens UM 98734 and UM 101075 are reported in Table 9. Fam., gen. et sp. indet. Material: UM 98578- postcranial material including left humeral head, left femoral head, terminal phalanx, distal metacarpal, proximal metatarsal, distal fibula, left proximal radius, left lateral cuneiform and five vertebral fragments, collected at BB044, June 20, 1991. UM 99661mr two terminal phalanx, one distal metacarpal, one proximal metacarpal, collected at BB103, June 23, 1992. UM 101101m- 146 trochlea of right astragalus, collected at BB110, July 27, 1992. Remarks: UM 98578 is the remains of a very small perissodactyl. The terminal phalange is only 8mm long. The specimen may be either a small equid species, or possibly represents some of the first postcranial remains known from the diminutive hyrachyid Seleneletes. UM 99661m is too large to belong to any of the early or middle Eocene equid taxa and too small to belong to Palaeoayppa fpntiaalia. It is unlikely representative of Lambdothpriaa, an important Lostcabinian (Wa7) taxon, since a specimen of the Bridgerian taxa anappyaa was identified from a lower level. It is most likely representative of either anapayaa, or gaiaapayppa ppaaaAAa. UM 101101m likely belongs to either a large specimen of Hyaapptharium or a small specimen of Lambdotheriumw It is too incomplete for further identification. Order RODENTIA Vicq d'Azyr, 1792 Suborder Protrogomorpha Zittel, 1893 Superfamily Ischromyoidea Wood, 1937 Family Sciuravidae Miller and Gidley, 1918 Genus Qaiaaayaa Marsh, 1871 App app Distribution: Early Eocene (Wa4) to late Eocene (Uil) of North America. Iypp Spepies: Qataaayaa aitidaa Marsh, 1871. 147 TABLE 9 Measurements (in mm.) of Perrisodactyla cf. Orohippus pumilus Hyaacotheriua sp. indet. UM 94890 UM 101158 /P3 AP 6.5 M2/ AP 7.2* Tr 4.1 Tr 8.9* /M1 AP 7.1 Hyaacotherium vasacciense Tra 4.9 UM 100890 Trp 5.1 M2/ AP 6.9 Tr 8.8* /M3 AP 9.7-10.4 Tra 5.8- 6.1 Trp 5.2- 5.8 Lambdotherium popapacium. Palaeosyops Um 100891 cf. 3. fontinalia /P2 AP 7.7 UM 98732 Tr 4.9 /dP4 AP 22.6* /P4 AP 9.7 Tr 15.1 Tr 6.6 P4/ AP 9.0 Tr - Ml/ AP 12.7 Tr 15.0 Qeleneletes sp. nov. UM 94913 UM 95597 /M2 AP 7.2 /M2 AP 8.1 Tra 5.6 Tra 5.5 Trp 5.9 Trp 5.7 /M3 AP 8.9 UM 98661 Tra 5.8 M3/ AP 3-5 Trp 5.7 Tr 9-1 UM 101029 /P3 AP 4.7 Tr 3.9 /P4 AP - Tr 4.4 Hyaachyas modestus UM 98734 UM 101075 P2/ AP 10.7 P/3 AP 14.0 Tr 13.7 Tr. 8.8 P3/ AP 13.7 M/3 AP 23.8 Tr 16.5 Tra 15.9 M2/ AP 18.4 Trp 14.1 Tr 20.6 M3/ AP 19.0* Tr 23.0* 148 Qpiaaayaa,aitipaa Marsh, 1871 Holotype: YPM 13333- fragment of left maxillary with M1/-M3/, collected from the lower Bridger Formation (Br2) at Grizzly Buttes, wyoming. Material: UM 98659, Fragment of left maxilla containing chipped /P4 and complete /M1, collected at BB013, June 25, 1991. UM 98662, Fragment of left maxilla containing /P3 through /M1, collected at BB013, June 25, 1991. UM 99637- fragment of right dentary containing /M1 through /M3, collected at BBO74, June 18, 1992. UM 99918- right Mx/ and associated postcrania, collected at BB109, July 20, 1992. UM 101018— left M2/, collected at BBO37, August 1, 1993. UM 101031- fragment of left maxilla with P4/ and Ml/, collected at BB013, August 1, 1993. UM 101033- left /Ml, collected at BB013, August 1, 1993. Remarks: The specimens agree quite closely with the illustrations and descriptions of Qciuravua nitipaa given by Wilson (1938) and West (1973). The anterior cingula are well-defined and rather cuspate, a tiny cusp, the metastylid is present near the base of the internal surface of the metaconid. The entoconid of /P4 is less pronounced than the other cusps on the tooth. The posterior cingulum of /M3 is heavier than in the other molars. Tooth measurements of all Qataaayaa teeth recovered from the study area are presented in Table 10. The specimens are all well within the size ranges for Qciaravus nitidua reported by West (1973). Korth 149 (1984) feels that West may have included specimens of the smaller Q. wilsoni in his sample since West included specimens collected from the Cathedral Bluffs Tongue of the Wasatch formation. All three specimens exceed the sizes for Q. wilapni reported by Gazin (1962). Genus Knightoays Gazin, 1961 .Iypp Species: Knightomys sanior (Gazin, 1952) App app Distribution: Early to middle Eocene (Wal-Brl) of Wyoming, Colorado, and New Mexico. Knightpays depreasus (Loomis, 1907) Holptype: ACM 432- partial skull with right M1/ to M3/ from the Lysite Member (Wa6) of the Wind River Formation, wyoming. Material: UM 101095- right M2/, collected at BB110, August 4, 1993. UM 101098— right /M3, collected at BB110, August 4, 1993. UM 101163- left /M3, collected at BB110, August 20, 1993. Rpmarka: Loomis (1907), using several isolated teeth, originally included the species in the genus Qpiaaayaa. Wood (1965) recognized that the skull of the animal was identical to that of the closely related genus Mappatpaya described by Gazin (1961). Although both genera are found within the study area, their ranges are distinct. Three isolated teeth, one M2/ and two /M3s have been referred to Knightoaya daprasaua. Although all three were collected from the same locality, the variance in tooth wear . or“ .Oli‘ - .on - vb. a!“ Vfifit V... -n‘. "‘v bi ‘ 55-; I- '04. O Nye: wlr F “403 “VA. t 'v ('J\ 'n _I (7 Ff m 150 makes it likely that they are from three different individuals. The metaconid of /M3 is the largest cusp, the other cusps are all relatively the same height, the anterior cingulum is separated from the protoconid and the metaconid. Consistent with the description of Korth (1984) the posterolingual lophid of the mesoconid of /M3 is elongate, and extends back to the posterolophid. A prominent metalophid extends labially from the protoconid, almost to the base of the metaconid. The hypolophid is a slight, barely perceptible ridge on the base of the talonid basin. The M1/ is essentially square in outline. Consistent with diagrams in Korth (1984), a prominent anterior cingulum runs in an arc from the paracone to the protocone. The protocone is the largest cusp. The other cusps are equal in size, and approximately half as large as the protocone. The mesocone is an independent cuspule rising from the posterior flank of the metacone. The metaconule extends anteriorly from the hypocone towards the centre of the tooth before cutting sharply back to the base of the paracone. The posterior cingulum is reduced in size and is almost worn away. Measurements of specimens UM 101095, UM 101098 and UM 101163 are presented in Figure 10. 151 Family Ischyromyidae Alston, 1876 Subfamily Paramyinae Simpson, 1945 Tribe Paramyini Korth, 1984 Genus Paraays Leidy, 1871 App app Distribution: Late Palaeocene (Ti6) to Late Eocene of North America, early Eocene (Neustrian) of Belgium and France. Eype Species: Paraaya delicatas Leidy, 1871 Paraaya excavatus Loomis, 1907 Holotype: ACM 327- fragment of right dentary with /P4- /M3, collected from the Lysite beds (Wa6)-of the Wind River Formation, near Bridger Creek, Wyoming. Paraaya cf. 2. pacavatus Loomis, 1907 Material: UM 100889- right /Ml, collected at BB114, July 25, 1993. Rpaarka: The metaconid is the largest cusp on the tooth, towering over a tiny trigonid basin and a deep, broad talonid basin. The other cusps are much lower, the entoconid barely higher than the posterior cingulum. A tiny cuspule, the mesoconid, rises from the labial side of the talonid basin. The enamel of the talonid basin is slightly crenulated. Wood (1962) split Paraays pMQavatus into four subspecies. Korth (1984) revised this diagnosis restricting the species to g, p. expavatas of Wood (1962). Two of the other subspecies, 2. p taaaaa and a. p. pplipaipena were 9. 152 incorporated into a new species, Paramys taurus. The fourth subspecies Paraays p. pardneri was incorporated into Thiabpaya pprpitas Wood, 1962. UM 100889 agrees well with the type description of Loomis (1907) and the emended diagnosis of Wood (1962) of Paraays excavatus. Although the specimen is closer in size to Paraaya pacavatua pardneri than any of the other subspecies of a. aapavatus described by Wood (1962), morphologically it is closer to a. p, excavatus. The slight crenulations on the surface of the tooth are not considered important enough to warrant inclusion in Thisppaya plipatua. Measurements of this specimen are presented in Table 10. Genus Leptotoapa Matthew, 1910 App app Distribution: Early middle Eocene (Brl) to early Oligocene (Chl) of western North America. Iypp Qpecies: Laptotomua leptodus Cope, 1873 Remarks: ppptptpaaa and Paraays are very closely related forms with many characters in common. Matthew (1910) originally established Leptotpmua as a subgenus of gaaaaya. Subsequent workers however have largely ignored this classification. Burke (1934) using specimens obtained from the Duchesne River in Utah, and Wilson (1940) using specimens from the Eocene of California, were the first to accept Laptptomus as a valid genus. Despite the striking similarities between ppptptpapa and Paraays, paptptpapa is the most easily differentiated of the paramyid rodents. The 153 lower incisors are oval in cross-section, the apex pointing anteriorly. The enamel, therefore, is on the narrowest side of the tooth, extending onto the lateral Surface, almost to the posterior side. This is the reverse of the situation in Paraaya and the other paramyid rodents, where the enamelled anterior side of the incisor is considerably wider than the posterior side. The cheek teeth of ppptptpaaa are rounder, simpler and have fewer irregularities than those of the other paramyid rodents. The crenulations characteristic of molars of Paraaya are absent in Leptotpmus and a ridge, absent in other paramyids, runs from the entoconid across the talonid basin. Leptotpmus parvus Wood, 1959 Matptial: UM 98710- fragment of the right dentary containing /M2 and /M3, incisor groove present, collected at BB073, June 28, 1990. UM 101030- fragment of left dentary extending from midway through /M1 to the middle of the ramus including the massentaric fossa, contains /M2-/M3 and the posterior half of /M1, collected at BBOl3, August 1, 1993. Remarks: UM 101030 agrees quite closely in size and morphology with the type of Leptptomus parvua described in Wood (1959) and additional specimens reported by Wood (1962). Laptotomus parvus is one of the smaller species of Leptotpmua, being only slightly larger than the diminutive Q. apairpidas and p. huerfanansia. UM 98710 is closest in size to this Leptotpmua parvua than any of the other species 154 of Leptotomus measured by Wood (1966). Measurements of specimens UM 98710 and UM 101030 are presented in Table 10. Leptotomus sp. indet. Material: UM 99660- fragment of left maxilla with /P3 and most of /P4, collected at BB103, June 23, 1992. Remarks: Wood (1962) proposed three informal species groups within Leptotomus. The specimens collected from the study area fall into the smallest species group, consisting of ppptptpaaa huarfanensis, p. parvus, p. bridppransia, Q. aytpnenais, and A, Maya. Wood (1962) felt that with the possible exception of p. huerfanensis this sequence represented a continuous evolutionary series. Based on geography and chronology it is likely that UM 99660 is either Leptotpmua huprfanensis or p. parvuaI however the specimen is not complete enough to identify to the species level. Measurements of specimen UM 99660 are presented in Table 10. Fam. gen. et sp. indet. Material: UM 98577m- isolated incisor, collected at BB037, June 20, 1991. UM 98726- two isolated incisors, collected at BB074, June 29, 1991. UM 101031- two isolated incisors, collected at BB110, July 27, 1992. UM 101101— isolated incisor, collected at BB110, August 5, 1993. UM 101015- isolated incisor, collected at BB116, July 31, 1993. UM 101164— /Mx, collected at BB110, August 5, 1993. 155 Table 10 Measurements (in mm.) of Rodentia Sciuravus nitidus UM 98662 UM 98659 P3/ AP 0.9 /P4 AP 1.8 Tr 1.1 Tr 2.0 P4/ AP 1.5 /Ml AP 2.0 Tr 2.1 Tr 2.1 Ml/ AP 1.7 UM 99637 Tr 2.2 /M1 AP 2.1 UM 99918 Tr 2.0 M2/ AP 2.1 /M2 AP 2.2 Tr 2.3 Tr 2.2 UM 101018 /M3 AP 2.7 M2/ AP 2.1 Tr 2.2 Tr 2.3 UM 101031 UM 101033 P4/ AP 1.7 /M1 AP 2.0 Tr 2.0 Tr 2.3 Ml/ AP 2.1 Tr 2.3 Maipatpaya papressus Leptotomus sp. indet. UM 101095 UM 99660 M2/ AP 2.0 P3/ AP 2.2 Tr 2.1 Tr 2.1 UM 101098 P4/ AP 3.7 /M3 AP 2.2 Tr 3.9 Tr 1.8 UM 101163 A. cf. p. huerfaapnaia /M3 AP 2.5 Tr 1.9 UM 98710 /M2 AP 3.5 gaaaaya cf. 2. aacavatus Tr 3.3 /M3 AP 4.1 UM 100889 Tr 3.3 /M1 Ap 3.2 Tra 2.7 Q. Papyas Trp 3.1 UM 101030 /Ml AP 3.9* Tr 3.6 /M2 AP 3.8 Tr 3.6 /M3 AP 4.6 Tr 3.6 .1d 5» h 7 ‘40V 2. «\u C .... a g N.» u OF "k ‘1 an)“. 156 Order Incertae Sedis Suborder Palaeanodonta Matthew, 1918 Remarks: Palaeanodonts are an early Tertiary group of "edentates" of uncertain origin and affinity. Matthew (1918) contended that the Suborder Palaeanodonta was ancestral to living xenarthrans. Simpson (1931) also argued for a close relationship with both the Xenarthra and the Pholidota, but recognized that they are too highly specialized to be directly ancestral. Additional evidence is needed before the precise relationships of the various edentate groups is sorted out. Family Metacheiromyidae Wortman, 1903 Genus Metacheiroays Wortman, 1903 App app Distripation: Middle Eocene (Brl-3) of North America, particularly the Bridger Basin of Wyoming. ,Eypp Qppcips: Metachairoaya marshi Wortman, 1903 Matapheiroaya sp. indet. Material: UM 98573- third metacarpal, collected at BBO37, June 20, 1991. UM 101037- ramus and caudal portion of mandibular body of left dentary, collected at BB074, August 1, 1993. Remarks: As is typical of the posterior portion of jaws of Matapppiapaya, specimen UM 101037 does not contain any teeth or alveoli. UM 98573 is typical of the metacarpals of metacheiromyids. Metacarpal III is stouter and longer than the other metacarpals. It is not notched .oev .— .d' .3 q 5A "r‘- ‘4 A\~ ‘.R 1,]: 157 ventrally like the other metacarpals. Based on size, both specimens are most likely referable to Metacheiromys Qaaypaa, however not enough material is present for a definitive identification. Genus Palaeanopon Matthew, 1918 App app Distribution: Late Palaeocene (Cf2) to early Eocene (Wa7) of North America and Asia. Type Species: Palaaanoppn ipaavus Matthew, 1918. Palaeanoppn sp. indet. Material: UM 100019- left third metacarpal, collected at BB110, July 27, 1992. UM 101094— left third metacarpal, collected at BB110, August 4, 1993. Rpmarks: The genus Palaeanodon is represented in the study area by two left third metacarpals. Based on size alone, the specimens are most likely referable to gaAaaaapppa Apaayaa, however, the material is insufficient for a specific identification. Family Epoicotheriidae Simpson, 1927 Rpmarka: Like palaeanodonts, epoicotheres are uniquely adapted to a digging lifestyle. Specializations of the skull and skeleton indicate they were probably subterranean burrowers (Rose and Emry, 1983). Genus QataapaaaaAaa Simpson, 1959 App app Diatripution: Middle Eocene (Brl-Br3) of North America. Logs §p___secie : 1355M: when; simpson. 1959 158 Tetrapassalus sp. Material: UM 99920- right partial humerus and ulna, collected at BB109, July 21, 1992. Remarks: The humerus of palaeanodonts is one of the most important diagnostic elements. The humerus of UM 99920 is shorter and squatter than the humerus of metacheiromyid palaeanodonts. The specimen is smaller than most other epoicotheres, and best fits the size range of Tetrapaasalua. 159 EOCENE BIOSTRATIGRAPHY Wood pt _A. (1941) proposed a standardized set of Provincial Land Mammal Ages to subdivide the Cenozoic of North America using characteristic groups of fossil mammals. Eighteen ages defined by characteristic suites of mammals were established, spanning the length of the Cenozoic. These units have served as standards in the attempt to correlate various faunas of similar age scattered across North America. Unfortunately the provincial ages of Wood et al. (1941) were named after lithostratigraphic units. As the faunas of the various ages have become better known, it has become apparent that the land mammal ages are rarely precisely contemporaneous with the lithostratigraphic unit for which the ages were named. Presently the Eocene Epoch consists of four ages and part of a fifth as defined by Gunnell et al. (1993): Wasatchian, Bridgerian, Uintan, Duchesnean and the early Chadronian. The present paper deals with the strata and faunas spanning the Wasatchian-Bridgerian boundary of southwestern Wyoming, and details two boundaries; the biochronologic Wasatchian—Bridgerian (=Lostcabinian- Gardnerbuttean) boundary, and the lithostratigraphic Wasatch-Green River-Bridger formational bOundary. As is shown in Figure 12, the two are not correlative within the study area. F I; 160 The Wasatchian and Bridgerian Land Mammal Ages have been further subdivided into a series of zones ("subages"). Table 11 presents the Eocene biostratigraphic terminology used in this thesis. As more and larger Palaeogene fossil mammal assemblages are discovered, the relationships between the various subages in the Tertiary Basins of the Rocky Mountain area shall become better understood. In recent years Eocene faunas have become better known and correspondingly the Land—Mammal Age system particularly the Bridgerian has undergone substantial revision. WASATCHIAN LAND MAMMAL AGE Hayden (1869) first used the name Wasatch as an informal reference to a series of formations in northeastern Utah and southwestern wyoming. Granger (1914) subdivided the Wasatchian of the Big Horn Basin into four units: Sand Couleean, Graybullian, Lysitean, and Lostcabinian. This paper utilizes the terminology of Gingerich (1989), who redivided the Wasatchian into eight biostratigraphic zones (WaO-Wa7). These zones correspond for the most part to Granger's units. This study is concerned primarily with Lysitean (Wa6) and the Lostcabinian (Wa7). BRIDGERIAN LAND MAMMAL AGE Matthew (1909) subdivided the Bridger Formation into five units (Bridger A through E). The units were separated lithologically by a series of "white layers", comparatively thick and widespread calcareous ash layers. Although these 161 were technically lithostratigraphic zonations, Matthew (1909) and many subsequent authors utilized these units as informal biostratigraphic zonations. Wood (1934) felt that while fossil abundance differed greatly between Bridger A and Bridger B deposits, the fauna was basically the same. He combined Bridger A and B into a single unit, the Black's Fork Member, and combined Bridger C and D into the Twin Buttes Member. He did not recognize the Bridger E as a distinct unit. To alleviate confusion, this paper distinguishes between Bridger A, a lithostratigraphic unit and Bridgerian A, a biostratigraphic unit. Robinson (1966) discovered a new fauna in the Huerfano Valley of Colorado, intermediate in age between Lostcabinian and Bridger A and proposed a new Wasatchian subage, the Gardnerbuttean. Stucky (1984a) reported a similar assemblage from the Wind River Basin. Stucky (1984a) and Krishtalka _t _A. (1987) included it in the Bridgerian Land- Mammal Age since the fauna has a stronger similarity to Bridgerian than to Lostcabinian faunas. Most recently, Gunnell et al. (1992) proposed revision of the Bridgerian Land-Mammal Age into three subages. These are Brl (Gardnerbuttean and "Bridgerian A"), Br2 ("Bridgerian B") and Br3 ("Bridgerian C", "Bridgerian D" and "Bridgerian E"). To alleviate confusion and to distinguish between upper and lower Brl, two zones are established. These are Br1.1, (Gardnerbuttean), and Br1.2, (Bridgerian A). 162 Table 11. North American Early to Middle Eocene Continental Biostratigraphy. Ma indicates millions of years before present and is approximate. NORTH AMERICAN LAND Alternate Zone EPOCH MA MAMMAL AGE ZONE Terminology Uintan Uil Early Uintan 47. 48. Br3 Late Bridgerian 48. Bridgerian Br2 Middle Bridgerian 49. E 49. Early Bridgerian O Brl (Brl.2) 50. Gardnerbuttean C (Br1.l) 50. E 51. Wasatchian N 51. Wa7 Lostcabinian E 52. 53. Wa6 Lysitean 54. 54. Wa5 Late Graybullian 55. 55. Wa4 Middle Graybullian 56. Wa3 Early Graybullian 56. Wal Late Sandcouleean 57. WaO Early Sandcouleean 57. P A 58. Clarkforkian Cf3 Late Clarkforkian L E 58. Cf2 Middle Clarkforkian O C 59. Cfl Early Clarkforkian E N E 163 AGE AND CORRELATION OF THE LITTLE MUDDY-DESERTION POINT FAUNAS Most of the vertebrate fossils collected within the study area come from two distinct faunas. The lower assemblage, the Little Muddy local fauna is vertically separated from the upper assemblage, the Desertion Point local fauna by approximately eighty meters of lacustrine sediments. The complete interval above contains, from oldest to youngest, the upper part of the La Barge Member of the Wasatch Formation, the Fontanelle Tongue and lower part of the Wilkins Peak Member of the Green River Formation, and the New Fork Tongue of the Wasatch Formation which bisects the Fontanelle Tongue. Table 12 provides a synopsis of the Chronologic ranges of the mammalian taxa from the Desertion Point-Little Muddy area. Table 12. Chronologic ranges of mammalian taxa within the Little Muddy-Desertion Point area. The lines indicate the known stratigraphic range of each taxon, X's indicate the horizons within the study area from which species have been recovered and ?'s denote questionable occurrences. WASATCHIAN BRIDGERIAN Wa6 Wa7 Br1.1 Br1.2 Perathariaa ——————————— x _________________ x-- g. comstpcki _____________________________ x-- g. innominatum ——————————— x _________________ X—- Palaapsinopa ——————————— x ____________________ p.1utreola ? ?-X-< Palaeictops ___________ x ___________________ g.bicuspia ——————————— x_< Qcanppapas ----------------------------- X—- Q. edenpnsia > .......... x__ g. priapus > __________ x- AEQEEEEE ----------- X -------------------- 1M ----------- X -------------------- 1- prayballiaaua X Micrpaypps ale ans acottianus F £335.12: .faapivoroas auatralotutus Anaaprhysis a. wortmani amilodectes Q. mcprewi W Bahia-19111 partari K) H Kim I5 H Mani Eotherium M. chamenaa Hyppapdu . m inisc 1n iticul rtmani E i n In g. F Di 9 secan Eyaap thorium, vasa ci n e prphippus umilus Laapp thorium O 08 Palaaosyops g. fonti 11 Hyaephyas E» gadgets: Qaleneletes Knightoaya Q. d r as s M p. T F T i F um F F v t F 164 Table 12 (cont'd). WASATCHIAN BRIDGERIAN Wa6 Wa7 Br1.l Br1.2 _ __________ x _________________ x-- 9-x__ >—X—9 ----------- X—< ----------- X—< ----------- X-< ----------- X-< ----------- X--------—-< -——-< X > ---------- X-- > —————————— x-- > ---------- X-- > ---------- X-- >-X-- >-X-- > ---------- X-- >-X-- ___________ x____-_______-______- > ---------- X-< ........... x__---_-_________-___ ___________ x__-__________-___--_ - __________ x _________________ X-- >.__.' ________________ X__ ----------- X—< ___________ x_< _ __________ X _________________ x__ X > —————————— X-- >-X-< ----------- X-< ______________________ < >-X ---------- < ___________ x----_____-____-__-__ ___________ x____-_________-_____. ----------- X--—? ___________ X_< > ——————————————————— x-— > ---------- X-- >-X-< >-X-< >-X -------- X—— >—X -------- X-- >-X -------- X—- >-X -------- X-- >-X-- ----------- X—< > ---------- X—< ___________ x-______-__________-_ ___________ x_-________________-_ i r vus Q. nitidus Laptotomus p. parvus Palaeanodon Matacheiroays Tetrapaasalus 165 Table 12 (cont'd). WASATCHIAN BRIDGERIAN Wa6 Wa7 Br1.1 Brl.2 LITTLE MUDDY LOCAL FAUNA The little Muddy Local fauna is contained by the La Barge Member of the Wasatch Formation, the lowest stratigraphic interval within the study area. Table 13 presents the vertebrate taxa collected from this level. The stratigraphic relationship of the localities are presented along with the measured sections as Plate 1 TABLE 13 Faunal List of the Little Muddy Local Fauna. Level Locality III 115, 118 II 114, 116 Taxon Lepisoateus sp. indet. Glyptosaurini indet. Peratharium.innpmiaataa Esthonya apatippns Lepisoateus sp. indet. Allopaathoaaphus sp. indet. Trionychidae indet. Glyptosaurini indet. Microsypps cf. M. scottiaaua Cantius cf. Q. ftapivoroua Copelemur of. Q. australptataa W sp. Hyopsodus cf. 3. wortmani Hyracotheriaa vasaccienae Lambdotheriaa.popoapaciaa Paraays of. g. excavatua 166 Table 13 (cont'd). Level Locality Taxon I 110 Lepisosteus sp. indet. Trionychidae indet. Glyptosaurini indet. Xestops of. M. vegans Amphisbaenia indet. Palaeosinopa cf. Q. latreola Palaeictops bicuspis Ipaacius praybullianus Cantius of. Q. frupivproas Anemorhysis cf. A aaplattensis Miacis latidans vulpavus profeptus Viverravus sp. Meniscotheriaa,ppaapaap Hyopsodus, cf. Q. minispulaa Hyopsodus cf. Q. wortmani Diacodexis cf. 2. secana Hyracotherium.vasacpiansa WW Palaeanodpn sp. LITTLE MUDDY LOCAL FAUNA, LEVEL I The lowest horizon containing the Little Muddy local fauna has been designated level I. Fifteen mammalian taxa have been identified from the locality at this level making it the most diverse locality within the study area. Several of the taxa from level I (Vivarravus, vulpavua prpfpptus, and Diacodpais) are characteristic of both the Wasatchian and the Bridgerian (Stucky, 1984a). The remaining are Wasatchian taxa. Mpniscptherium.ppaapaap is known primarily from the upper Lysitean of the Piceance Creek and San Juan basins of Colorado, and the Lostcabinian of the Wind River and Green River basins of Wyoming (Gazin, 1965). Knipptoays depressus is known from the Lysitean 167 through the Lostcabinian (Korth, 1984) and possibly the middle Bridgerian (Gunnell et al., 1992). Miacia latidens is with a few exceptions, limited to the Lostcabinian. Guthrie (1967) reported three specimens of M. latidans from the Lysitean of the Wind River Formation, and Matthew (1915) reported a single tooth from the Graybullian of the Bighorn Basin. M. latidpna is only known from the Lostcabinian (Wa7) within the Green River Basin (i.e. West, 1973; Gazin, 1952; 1962). Two species of Hyopsodus were identified from this level. Hyppapdus wortmani is limited to the Lysitean (Wa6) and Lostcabinian (Wa7) (Gazin, 1968; West, 1973; 1979). Hyopsodus miticulus is known only from the Wasatchian (West, 1973; 1979). Palaeanopon and Hyaacotherium are known throughout the Wasatchian (Stucky, 1984a). Several isolated teeth referred to Cantius frupivorpaa were identified from this horizon. This notharctine primate is known primarily from the middle Wasatchian (Graybullian) of western North America (Beard, 1988). Palaaiptops bicuspia is known throughout the Wasatchian, and is a particularly common insectivore in the Wind River Lostcabinian (Guthrie, 1971). Palaeosinppa latraola is known primarily from the Graybullian (Wa3-5) of the Bighorn Basin (Bown and Schankler, 1982). Specimens previously referred to this species by Guthrie (1971) fall out of the size range of this taxon and are likely referable to Q. inperta or Q, 168 dipplphoides (Bown and Schankler, 1982). Anemorhysia apataaai is unknown outside of the Graybullian of the Bighorn Basin (Bown and Rose, 1984) possibly due to its extreme rarity. Ipaacius praybullianus, the only early Eocene member of the genus, is also known only from the Graybullian of the Bighorn Basin (Bown and Rose, 1976). Based primarily on the presence of Miacia latipena and Mpniscptheriaa phamense, the Little Muddy local fauna, level I is tentatively referred to the Lostcabinian. While it is recognized that these taxa are known from older deposits elsewhere, within the Green River Basin they are known only from Lostcabinian strata. Additional field work may reveal that this level is actually Lysitean in age. The age and geographic range of Palaaoainppa cf. Q. lutraola, Anaaprnysia aprtmani and Ipaacius praybullianpa are extended to include the Lostcabinian (or possibly Lysitean) of the southwestern Green River Basin. LITTLE MUDDY LOCAL FAUNA, LEVEL II The only common elements between levels I and II (see below) are Qantiaa cf. Q. faapivprous, Maniscothpriaa, and Hyaappthprium vaaacciense, taxa previously known from the middle to late Wasatchian (Beard, 1988; Kitts, 1956; Stucky, 1984b). The most diagnostic taxon in level II is Melting W. a species long considered the index fossil for the Lostcabinian (Granger, 1914; Stucky, 1984a; 1984b). Paraaya excavatua is known only from the 169 Lysitean (Wa6) and Lostcabinian (Korth, 1992). Two specimens of Copelemur cf. Q. australotutus have been identified from this level. Beard (1988) erected this species on two specimens collected in the vicinity of Fossil Butte in southwestern Wyoming. There is some conjecture as to the precise age of these strata, although they are considered Wasatchian (Gazin, 1962; Beard, 1988). A single /M3 of Qaataaa cf. Q. frupivorpua, a Graybullian (Wa3—5) taxon (see above), was collected from locality BB114. Fragments of Meniscotherium teeth were scattered over a large portion of Locality BB114. Meniacotherium is common from the Late Palaeocene (Cf2) of the Bighorn Basin and Alberta, to the Lostcabinian of the Washakie, Wind River, and Green River basins (Gazin, 1965; Stucky, 1984b). MApapayppa appttianus is known from the Lostcabinian (Wa7) and possibly, the Gardnerbuttean (Br1.1; Gunnell, 1989). Level II is similar in most respects to the La Barge fauna of Gazin (1952, 1962). It correlates with the LEEDQQEEEELEE Range Zone of Stucky (1984a), the Wapiti II fauna of Gunnell pt al. (1992), the Lost Cabin beds of the Bighorn Basin of Schankler (1980), and the lower Huerfano of Robinson (1966). The occurrence of Cantiua cf. Q. faapivprpua with Laappptperium suggests that this taxon survived longer in the Green River Basin than elsewhere in western North America. Level II is clearly Lostcabinian (Wa7) in age. 170 LITTLE MUDDY LOCAL FAUNA, LEVEL III Two mammalian taxa have been identified from Little Muddy level III. Peratherium innominatum is known from the early Wasatchian through the Duchesnean of the Rocky Mountain region (Krishtalka and Stucky, 1983). Eathonya acutippna is, with the exception of a single specimen from the Gardnerbuttean of the Huerfano Basin (Mckenna, 1976), known only from the Lostcabinian (Gingerich and Gunnell, 1979). All Q. acutidens identified within the Green River Basin has been reported from Lostcabinian localities (West, 1973; Gazin, 1962). Based on this, Little Muddy local fauna level III is tentatively referred to the Lostcabinian. DESERTION POINT LOCAL FAUNA The Desertion Point local fauna was collected from the Whiskey Butte Bed of the Bridger Formation, the Craven Creek Bed of the Laney Member of the Green River Formation, and the upper portion of the Upper Member of the Wasatch Formation. Table 14 presents the vertebrate taxa collected from this level. The stratigraphic relationship of the localities is presented along with the measured sections as Plate 1. DESERTION POINT LOCAL FAUNA LEVEL I Similar to the Wapiti IV local fauna of Gunnell et al. (1992), level I is comprised of a single species, anapayaa Level 171 TABLE 14 Faunal List of the Desertion Point Local Fauna. Locality 35, 37, 38, 44 Taxon Lepisosteus sp. indet. Amia sp. indet. Echmateays sp. indet. Echmatemys septaria Merges; Alligatoridae indet. Allopaathosuchus sp. indet. Diplocyaodon sp. indet. Crocodylus affinia W Glyptosaurini indet. Xestops sp. indet. glen-119mm Peratherium coaatocki Q. innominatum cf. Apateays sp. indet. chnopapas openensis 3m Notharctus appiaapa; Smilodectes mcprewi washakius insipais Viverravus pracilis Hyrachyas modestus Sciuravus nitidua Metacheirpays 172 Table 14 (cont'd). Level Locality Taxon IV 12, 19, 36 Lapiaosteas puneatua 69, 70, 74 Lapisosteas sp. indet. 76, 77, 109 Amie sp. indet. Ictaluridae sp. indet. Baena arenosa __emLBchmat 8 m Echmateays ayominpensis Ephmateays sp. indet. cf. Platypeltis sp. indet. Baptaays fluviatalis Bapteays sp. indet. Alligatoridae indet. Allopaathosuchus sp. indet. Diplocyaodon sp. indet. WM Pristichaapsua Glyptosaurini indet. Glyptosaurus aylvestris Qpatppa sp. indet. Peratherium innominataa Microsyops slogans Smilodectes sp. Motharctus robinaoni paomys carteri Omoays cf. p. carteri cf. Orohippus pumilaa Palaeosyops cf. Q. QpatiaaAia Hyaachyas modestua Qciuravus nitidus; Metacheiroaya sp. Tetrapassalua sp. 173 Table 14 (cont'd). Level Locality Taxon III 13, 13w, 68 Lepisosteus cuneatus 75 Lepisosteus sp. indet. Ania sp. indet. Ictaluridae indet. Baena arenosa Echmateays septaria Echmatemys sp. indet. Bapteays fluviatalis Bapteays sp. indet. Allopaathosuchus sp. indet. Crocodylidae indet. Magi—Ilia Parasauromalus plseni Glyptosaurini indet. Xestops. sp. indet. Microsyops elegans Hyopsodus cf. Q. minispulaa prohippus sp. Qeleneletes sp. Sciuravus nitidus Leptotomus parvus II 14, 51, 96 Lepisostpus sp. indet. 97, 103, 104 Echmateays of. Q. cibpllensia Bapteays sp. indet. Glyptosaurini indet. Palaeosyops cf. Q, fontiaalia Leptotpmua sp. I 117 Hyraphyaa modestas 174 modeatas. Hyrachyas is known from the earliest Bridgerian to well into the Uintan (Radinsky, 1967; Stucky, 1984b; Woodburne, 1987). West (1973) reported both Hyaachyas and Lambdothpriaa.from a single locality that spans over sixty meters of stratigraphic section. It is uncertain if the two taxa came from the same horizon. Until conclusive evidence of overlap in the ranges of Qaappptppaaaa and anappyaa is provided, Hyrachyas can be retained as a diagnostic Bridgerian taxon. Level I is interpreted as Gardnerbuttean based on the presence of Hyaachyas modestas, and its stratigraphic position (see Level III below). DESERTION POINT LOCAL FAUNA, LEVEL II Two mammalian taxa have been identified from Level II, Laptptpmua sp., and Palaeosyops cf. Q. fontinalis. Q. fpntiaalia is indicative of an early Bridgerian (Brl) designation (Gunnell and Bartels, in press; Gunnell et al., 1992). Laptotamua is first recognized from the Gardnerbuttean (Korth, 1984; Stucky, 1984b). Echmataaya is a common element in Desertion Point local fauna levels III through V. The two species known from these levels, Q. septaria, and.Q, ayominpenais are unknown from.the lower levels, including II. A single specimen of the poorly known emydid Ephmatpaya cf. Q. cibpllanaia was collected from level II. This taxon is not present however in the substantial collection of lower vertebrates collected from higher levels within the study area. Further study may 175 confirm that the presence of Q. cibollensis is indicative of pre—Bridgerian A deposition. Level II is interpreted as early Gardnerbuttean based on the fauna of the overlying level III (see below). DESERTION POINT LOCAL FAUNA, LEVEL III Six mammalian taxa have identified from level III. All are indicative of the early Bridgerian. Sciuravus nitidus first appears in the Gardnerbuttean and is common throughout the Bridgerian (West, 1973). Microsyops slogans is known from.the middle Bridgerian of southwestern Wyoming (Gunnell, 1989). A single specimen from the Gardnerbuttean of the Willwood Formation of Wapiti Valley (Gunnell et al., 1992) and several specimens from the Bridger A and B of the Aycross Formation of Hot Springs and Park County (Bown, 1982; Gunnell, 1989; Gunnell et al. 1992) have been referred to M. plepana. The taxa from this level are indicative of the early Bridgerian (Brl). It is difficult to assign this level to either the Bridgerian A or to the Gardnerbuttean with the available information. Qelenaletpa is poorly known, the only specimens of known provenance outside the study area were collected from the Gardnerbuttean (Brl.l) QaAappayppa ppapaaaa Zone of Stucky (1984a; 1984b). Qyppappaa minispulas and Orohippus are common Bridgerian taxa. prohippaa is also known from the late Wasatchian (Korth and Evander, 1982; Stucky, 1984a; 1984b). Laptotpmus parvua is 176 known from the upper Huerfano Formation (Gardnerbuttean; Robinson, 1966) and is common throughout the middle Bridgerian of the Green River Basin. Based primarily on the presence of Seleneletes, Level III is interpreted as Gardnerbuttean (Br1.1). The A geographic range of Qeleneletes is extended to include the southwestern Green River Basin. DESERTION POINT LOCAL FAUNA, LEVEL IV papaya carteri and.Washakius insipais are first known from the Bridger A of the southwestern Green River Basin (Gunnell, pers. comm.), and range through the end of the Bridgerian in this area. Notharctus rpbinspni is known only from the early Bridgerian of the Green River, Huerfano, and possibly the Bighorn basins (Gingerich, 1979). Orphippas pumilaa is known from the lower (McGrew and Sullivan, 1970) and middle Bridgerian (Gazin, 1976) of the Bridger Basin, and from the Gardnerbuttean Aycross Formation of the Wind River Basin (Stucky, 1984b). Tetrapassalas is known from the middle Bridgerian of the Bridger Basin (Stucky, 1984a). Qmilppectea is known throughout the Bridgerian of North America. Based primarily on the co-occurrence of Nptharctaa robinapni and Omoaya carteri, level IV is interpreted as Bridger A (Brl.2). The known range of Tatrapassalus is extended to include the early Bridgerian. 177 DESERTION POINT LOCAL FAUNA, LEVEL V Level V is the highest interval within the study area. Seven mammalian taxa not found in any of the lower intervals have been identified from level V. Two species of Qpaappapaa, Q. prisons, and Q. edenansis are found at this level. Both of these species are known from the Bridgerian A (Br1.1) of the northeastern Green River Basin (West, i 1973), the Gardnerbuttean (Brl.2) of the Huerfano Basin (Robinson, 1966), and the middle Bridgerian (Br2) of the southern and eastern Green River Basin (McGrew, 1959). Viverravua pracilis is a common taxon in the early and middle Eocene of the Rocky Mountain region (West, 1973). Parathprium comatocki is common throughout the early and middle Eocene of wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico, and Texas (Krishtalka and Stucky, 1983). Qmilodectes mcprewi is known from the Gardnerbuttean of the Huerfano Basin and the Bridgerian A of the Green River Basin (Gingerich, 1979). Metachairpaya is known from the early and middle Bridgerian (Brl-Br2) of the southwestern Green River Basin (Gunnell and Bartels, in press; Stucky, 1984a). washakius insipaia is known primarily from Bridgerian A (Brl.2) and Bridgerian B (Br2) within the Green River Basin (Gunnell, in prep.). Based primarily on the co-occurrence of Qmilodactas appaapi, waapakius insipais, and chnopapas, Level V is referred to Bridgerian A (Brl.2). 178 STRUCTURAL AND SEDIMENTARY HISTORY The Green River Basin (Figure 1) is bounded by Laramide uplifts and mountain systems to the south east and north. The basin is filled with approximately 3,000 meters of Tertiary strata (Blackstone, 1955; Sullivan, 1980). Laramide tectonism commenced in the Late Cretaceous, and although some movement continued through the end of the Eocene (Chadronean), it was effectively completed in the Early Eocene (Wasatchian, Lillegraven, 1992). The west margin of the study area is formed by the Wyoming Overthrust Belt, a complex of thrust fault mountains. Initial movement began in the early Mesozoic (Rubey, 1955) with major deformation continuing (locally) into the early middle Eocene (Andermann, 1955). Formation of the Green River Basin commenced in the Late Cretaceous with initial downwarping initiated by Laramide tectonism and augmented by sedimentary loading from the Overthrust Belt (Shuster and Steidtmann, 1988). Subsidence continued well into the Tertiary (West, 1976). The sedimentary history of the early to late Eocene of the Green River Basin centres around the multiple regressions and transgressions of Eocene Lake Gosiute, a large shallow lake that occupied the centre of the basin. The deposits of this lake, now represented by the Green River Formation, is one of the largest accumulations of lacustrine sedimentary rocks in the world (Grande, 1984). 179 Lake Gosiute is currently thought to have been a playa lake complex (Surdam and Wolfbauer, 1975). Lake Gosiute was set in the centre of a large, relatively flat intermontane plain. The abundance of fine-grained material extending from the center to the periphery of the basin indicates that fl "the original dip (gradient) probably did not exceed 1 or 2 F feet per mile except in a rather narrow belt adjacent to the mountains" (Bradley, 1964 p. A16). Minor fluctuations in water depth would therefore have resulted in the extensive inundation of the lowlands adjacent to the lake. In periods of drought the lake became quite restricted and likely very saline (Surdam and Wolfbauer, 1975; Grande, 1984). The lake was eutrophic ( characterized by abundant organic material and a seasonal oxygen deficiency in the lowest layers, usually shallow) as is evidenced by the abundant organic mudstones, oilshales and periodically extensive algal limestones produced at different stages in its history (Surdam and Wolfbauer 1975). Lake Gosiute likely began as a system of small lakes, swamps and ponds on the subsiding Wasatch Plain (Surdam and Wolfbauer, 1975). Expansion of the lake throughout most of the Bridger Basin is signified by the Luman Tongue of the Green River Formation, which does not crop out within the study area. A major regression of the lake is represented by the fluviatile red-bed deposits of the La Barge Member of the Wasatch Formation. Figure 18 shows the relationship of Figure 18. 180 Correlation chart of lithostratigraphy, fossil vertebrate localities, faunal levels, and biostratigraphy. DPLF denotes Desertion Point local fauna, LMLF denotes Little Muddy local fauna. 181 namnnuau ummarmnruv Locumr mm. mm.xflcu"y no was"! um: I!» - - . DPLF v u ‘ um: FOIIATION 1.1.? uoas.m.onm ' , cum: cam no I macaw: a , mm lam "I! Iv n _ _- - (um) . emu mu Ion-Anon (I 1 F t . untm ' J {333:3 uom ' 3w 1"? 1'1“: . 4' . um lam Elm: 4 mm 4 numnu untn . mum summon mu W g:§§umm”, ummmwnuu . wuxfll‘fin E on.» . W m m E m | ' . ‘ - I ”k v .‘. Imam Iron-men ~««‘ ,1- ‘ mum nu lulu m..." '1 ‘33—— :— . ummnwnwmmumu . _r'm val __j_________ *Immmwunmwt ‘ mu um summon m mu mm: '0" m m Ion-moo . mummu ramus um um mumou a p- - - ------ - - — ‘ 1484.0! mm ‘ .-.-.-‘- u as»: um I: . mum: FOIIA‘IIOI w A - 3 sum: " um " g loam 1 «un .--- A 51':- nm um I L Figure 18 182 the lithostratigraphy, biostratigraphy, and fossil vertebrate localities within the study area. The sediment that comprises the La Barge Member is derived from active faulting in the Overthrust Belt west of the study area (Lawrence, 1965) . The Little Muddy local fauna (see above, Table 13) is found entirely within the La Barge Member. The thick gastropodal limestone at the base of the Fontanelle Tongue represents another major transgression of Lake Gosiute. The absence of stromatolites in this unit may indicate that the transgression was rapid (Lawrence, 1965) . The abundance of Goniobasis tenera in this layer may indicate that much of unit was deposited in the littoral zone (Hanley, 1976) . Fragmented elements of fish are also COmrnon in this layer. Surdam and Wolfbauer (1975) consider the Fontanelle Tongue representative of a maximum stand of Lake Gosiute. The overlying Wilkins Peak Member is characterized by organic rich mudstones interbedded with algal limestones. At this time the lake vacillated from freshwater to hYPersaline conditions as is indicated by the abundant interbedded stromatolitic limestones and organic shales (Surdam and Wolfbauer, 1975) . Hypersaline water and the absence of aquatic grazers are essential for the p"-'eServation of cryptalgal structures (Logan et al., 1974; Surdam and Wolfbauer, 1975) . Chemically enriched water may 183 explain the absence of fossil vertebrates, even fish, within most of this layer. Periodically, during the deposition of the Wilkins Peak Member, the lake retreated far enough for the study area to be eJ-cposed. This is evidenced by mudcracks in many of the shales overlying the stromatolitic layers (Surdam and Wolfbauer, 1975) . The presence of Qmppm W, a tapiroid perissodactyl, at locality BB117 near the base of the vvilkins Peak Member is additional evidence that the study area was exposed at this time. Qmpama is also indicative of Bridgerian deposition. The presence of a Bridgerian index taxon in strata immediately above, and Wasatchian taxa below the lacustrine beCis of the Fontanelle Tongue indicates that the Wasatchian- Bridgerian boundary is obscured within the Bridger Basin by a major transgression of Lake Gosiute. This single specimen 0f afiachfla along with several unidentifiable turtle fragments constitutes Desertion Point local fauna level I. The presence of diagnostic Bridgerian taxa over 200 meters bEJ-Ow the base of the Bridger Formation clearly shows that the Wasatchian-Bridgerian biostratigraphic boundary is not correlative with the Wasatch-Bridger lithostartigraphic boundary in the southwestern Green River Basin, the type area of both of these Land Mammal Ages. Major tectonic activity in both the Overthrust Belt to the West and in the Wind River Mountains to the northeast 184 supplied the sediment for the litharenites of the New Fork Tongue which interbed with the lacustrine strata of the Wilkens Peak Member (Lawrence, 1965) . The intertongueing of the fluvial beds of the New Fork Tongue and the lacustrine beds of the Wilkens Peak Member may indicate that the New Fork Tongue represents a delta (Lawrence, 1965) . Renewed tectonic activity of the Uinta Mountains to the south resulted in the deposition of the fluviatile beds of the Upper Member of the Wasatch Formation (Lawrence, 1965) . The interbedded red-gray fluviatile deposits of the Wasatch Formation may indicate periodic inundation followed by desiccation and an interval of non-deposition, allowing for E M oxidation of the iron-rich sediments (Braunagel and Stanley, 1977; Roehler, 1965). Shorter periods of deSiccation and non-deposition resulted in the predominance 0f mottled red mudstones with thin, discontinuous algal limestones and thick channel sandstones in the lower part of the Upper Member indicating a terrigenous environment more Proximal to the shore of Lake Gosiute than in the upper Part . Only a few vertebrate fossils have been recovered from the lower part of the Upper Member of the Wasatch Formation. Of these fossils, only a single specimen of W cf. Q. pibollpnsia has been identified. All Other fossils, mammals and reptiles alike, are characterized by a high degree of post-depositional corrosion. Desertion 185 Point local fauna level II was collected from the lower 11alf of the Upper Member of the Wasatch Formation. The less mottled, more colourful mudstones of the upper part of the Upper Member were deposited in a better drained jfluvial environment. While few fossils have been identified from most of these layers, they are typically much better 1;:reserved than specimens from the lower part of this unit. The mudstones at the top of the Upper Member of the Wasatch Formation have produced a small but diverse and diagnostic assemblage of fossil vertebrates designated Desertion Point local fauna level III (Table 14) . The upper boundary of the Upper Member of the Wasatch Formation signals another transgression of Lake Gosiute. These deposits have been termed the Craven Creek Bed of the Laney Member of the Green River Formation (Sullivan, 1980) . Within the study area, this transgression coincides with a major deposit of ash, likely from the Absaroka volcanic field in the northwest corner of Wyoming. This ash deposit buried large amounts of organic material preventing rotting, and resulting in the tuffaceous lignitic mudstone which marks the upper boundary of the Wasatch Formation within the field area. Many of the specimens incorporated into Desertion Point local fauna level IV were collected at the top of this tuffaceous lignite. The interbedded lignites, gray —green mudstones, discontinuous algal limestones, low- grade oil shales and cross—bedded channel sandstones 186 indicate that the Craven Creek Bed is a mixture of lacustrine, paludal, and fluviatile deposition (Roehler, 21965) . The presence of both fluvial taxa such as glyptosaurine lizards, Anosteira, Allogn_athosuchua, and perhaps Bapteays fluviatalis and lake to lake-margin taxa such as Crpcodylus, Baena arenoaa, and possibly A_myda. from tzhis layer also suggest frequent environmental turnover. The last major event in the study area was the regression of Lake Gosiute, resulting in deposition of the fluviatile deposits of the Whiskey Butte Bed of the Bridger Formation. JFas is indicated by the light gray to gray-green mudstones and siltstones, the Whiskey Butte Bed was deposited in the lowlands adjacent to the lake. The greenish tinge in most of the mudstones is indicative of the reduction of iron in poorly drained conditions (Roehler, 1965) . Desertion Point local fauna level V was collected from the Whiskey Butte bed. PALEOENVIRONMENTS AND PALEOECOLOGY The following comprises a brief interpretation of the paleocology and paleoenvironments of the various lithologies wi thin the study area. Interpretations of paleogene paleoenvironments generally utilize floral remains rather that: terrestrial vertebrates since many plant genera and f - . . . . amllles present in the Paleogene are still alive today 187 while vertebrate (particularly mammalian) generic and familial turnover rates are comparatively rapid. PALEOBOTANY AND GENERAL PALEOECOLOGY Although the paleobotany of the Green River Formation (Df Utah and Colorado is well known, collections from the Green River Basin (ex. Hayden, 1871; Lesquereaux, 1878; 1898, and Knowlton, 1923) have little 1883; Newberry, 1883; stratigraphic or geographic control. These collections do not appear markedly different in composition than collections from the Uinta Basin (MacGinite, 1969) . Plant macrofossils from the study area are limited to fragments of permineralized wood, carbonized root traces in many of the mudstones, fragmented plant debris in the lignitic ash layer at the base of the Craven Creek Bed of the Laney Member of the Green River Formation, and a single hackberry seed (Genus Cpltia) from the La Barge Member of the Wasatch Formation. Based on floral analysis of the Green River Formation in the Uinta Basin of northeastern Utah and northwestern Colorado, MacGinite (1969) suggested a warm temperate to Subtropical environment with savannah type vegetation Conditions proximal to the lake and subhumid shrub to open forest conditions at slightly higher altitudes. Precipitation was highly seasonal with abundant rainfall in t . . . . . . he spring and drought conditions in the fall (MacGinite, l . . . . 9 6 S) . Annual preCipltation was 24—34 inches (60—85cm) at 188 Zlake level, and 38 inches (95cm) in the surrounding uplands (Bradley, 1963). Based primarily on the distribution of IEocene volcanic ash deposits, prevalent wind direction is t:hought to have been from the north (Clark et a1, 1967). The size of Eocene Lake Gosiute would have had a strong Geffect on the climate of the Green River Basin. During high .sstands of the lake, it is probable that the local climate 1uvas comparatively equitable, with more moderate high and low t:emperatures, and higher humidity. When the lake was more :zrestricted in size, annual temperatures reached greater «eaxtremes and humidity was lower. It is uncertain to what «eaxtent this climatic variance affected faunal composition. PALEOECOLOGY- LITTLE MUDDY LOCAL FAUNA The La Barge Member of the Wasatch Formation was deposited in drier times than the overlying strata within t:131e study area. Lake Gosiute was restricted to the centre 1E the Green River Basin, far to the east of the study area. 'Jfir1ea Little Muddy local fauna, derived exclusively from this J—Eizywar, was dominated by adapid primates and condylarths. While adapid primates are comparably common throughout tiklfia study area, condylarths are almost nonexistent in the C)“"‘EE-'Zl::‘lying Wasatch and Green River formations. Two czc>l:lsz the Bridger Formation represent frequent vacillation be tween terrigenous and lacustrine dominated conditions. The abundance of aquatic and amphibious taxa from the upper laYers of the Upper Member of the Wasatch Formation and the CIITEixaen Creek Bed of the Laney Member of the Green River F03|:“I:1-1ation indicates the close proximity of the shoreline of Lake Gosiute. Turtles and crocodiles are represented by I1“airlmr'large, diverse forms. Fish are common and also reached large sizes. Although only three taxa have been identified, 192 it is possible, indeed likely, that many forms existed since teleosts are difficult to identify with only fragmentary remains. Most of the turtle specimens collected within the study area were comprised solely of carapace and plastron even those with articulated elements. Few specimens, shells, possessed any associated limb or cranial material. :Most likely, with subsidence of rigor mortis and the relaxation of striated skeletal muscle, the head and the limbs were extended out from the body. As decomposition «continued, small scavengers were attracted and initiated Imechanical destruction of the corpse. Birds and most other <2arrion-eaters were limited to portions that could be zremoved.through.the front or back openings of the shell. jéglthough bird fossils have not yet been identified from the sstzudy area, Grande (1984) reported several fine specimens 15t:rom.fossil quarries in the Green River Formation elsewhere and indicated that footprints of jL1:L the Green River Basin, Scavenging arthropods aquatic waterfowl are not uncommon. LLii.Jcely completed the removal of soft tissue, in most cases VV:i.t:hout seriously damaging the carapace or plastron. ESCZEafivengers turning dead individuals on their backs for eaéiésaier access to shell openings may explain why most turtles VVEEJE‘GE found lying plastron up. The presence of abundant pulmonate gastropods such as lilEEIEEEQJ and Biggphlgria, are indicative of poorly drained 193 Imarshy wetlands (Hanley, 1977). Fossorial taxa such as the «edentates Metacheirogxs and Eggggngggglgg and arboreal taxa :such as the primates Omogxs, Notharctus, and Smilgdectgg, 'the proprimate Microszogs, and the marsupial Peratherium salong with abundant specimens of the anguid lizard (Slxntgsguggs combined with the plethora of large aquatic and aamphibious taxa indicate well-developed forests in close Iproximity to Lake Gosiute. Abundant localized lignitic and (organic mudstone deposits interspersed with a plethora of :small channel sandstones indicates a frequently flooded, Itaeavily forested environment, with abundant swamps, ponds, sand streams on the lowlands at the edge of Lake Gosiute. The lower Bridger Formation represents a return to 1;xredominantly terrigenous conditions, This is confirmed by t:11e abundance of terrestrial taxa such as edentates ( Metacheiroys) , insectivores (Sgenonaggs and M) , marsupials (Peragherium), primates (Notgrcgus, W, and Waggkiug) , and squamates (Xegtons and the boid W) . Comparatively short lake incursions allowed for tir1wlands adjacent to the lake. DISCUSSION AND SUMMARY The Wasatchian-Bridgerian boundary is best known from the Huerfano Basin (Robinson, 1966) , the Wind River Basin ( Stucky, 1984a; 1984b), the Bighorn Basin (Bown, 1982; Gsillinell et al. 1992) and the northeastern Green River Basin (IOTGest, 1973; West and Dawson, 1973). In most cases, the boundary is marked by a transition zone, combining 195 characteristic taxa of both the latest Wasatchian (Wa7) and the earliest Bridgerian (Brl). The present study has shown that within the southwestern Green River Basin the Wasatchian—Bridgerian boundary is represented by about eighty meters of essentially unfossiliferous lacustrine sediments that reflect the intrusion and recession of Eocene Lake Gosiute. This interval saw considerable change in the vertebrate fauna of the area. The following paragraphs incorporate these new data with previous studies of the region. established two distinct faunal zones The lowest, the Lflgghgrium The upper he termed the Stucky (1984b) above and below the boundary. range zone is Lostcabinian in age. Pglaeosxons (=Eotitanops) borealis range zone (also marked by the appearance of Enachms) . In the Wind River and Huerfano basins these two faunas do not overlap. West ( 1973) reported Enachms and Lambdotherigg from one and Palaeogxops borealis and Lmdgghgrim from locality, another locality in the northwestern Green River Basin. Both localities represent approximately 60 meters of S tratigraphic section however and it is not known where in the section any of the fossils were collected. Additional e‘7‘idence is needed before Hyrachmg and Palaeosxong can be considered contemporaneous taxa of mm. The Wapiti II local fauna of Gunnell §_t_ a], (1992) contains both W and Eotitanops borgglis and is the only place 196 where these two animals are known to co-exist. This may indicate that either the Wapiti II local fauna is slightly Blounger than Lostcabinian localities elsewhere or that basin tnargin faunas differ from central basin faunas (Gunnell gt al., 1992) . Within the field area, specimens of lambdggherium and Enachms were collected from localities separated by more than 100 meters of stratigraphic section. Palaeogxons is first known from approximately 120 meters above Mm. Unlike the classic Gardnerbuttean (Brl.1) and the Palaeosxons boreglig 1984b), in the I-Iuerfano Basin (Robinson, 1966) assemblage zone of the Wind River Basin (Stucky, :strata assigned to the Gardnerbuttean within the study area eare characterized by an absence of Wasatchian forms. Analogous to the Gardnerbuttean fauna described by West ( 1973) , the Desertion Point Gardnerbuttean resembles a depauperate Bridgerian fauna rather than a mix of Wasatchian and Bridgerian forms. The difference between the (3:21rdnerbuttean of the Green River Basin and that of the IBLi.ghorn, Wind River and Huerfano Basins is largely due to i ts depositional history. The early Tertiary sedimentary history of the Bighorn, Wind River and Huerfano basins is dominated by floodplain, s'Zl‘eam, alluvial fan, and occasionally volcaniclastic deposits (Gingerich, 1989; Gunnell et al. 1992; Robinson, 1 9 6 6; Stucky, 1984b). The Palaeogene of the Green River 197 Basin was dominated by transgressions and regressions of an extensive lake system known as Lake Gosiute. This lake System periodically inundated most of the available terrestrial habit within the basin. The Green River Basin, therefore, frequently needed to be repopulated by terrestrial plants and animals. Rather than a transitional fauna, the Wasatchian- :Bridgerian boundary is marked by a 80 meter hiatus representing a major transgression of fossil Lake Gosiute. 'I‘his transgression is marked by the thick lacustrine deposits of the Fontanelle Tongue of the Green River Formation. The subsidence of the lake is marked by the <fleposition of the Wilkins Peak Member. By the time the lake had subsided to the minimum represented by the terrigenous beds of the Upper Member of the Wasatch Formation, most Wasatchian forms had become extinct, and the area was repopulated by early Bridgerian animals. The Wasatchian-Bridgerian boundary is a time of significant faunal change, particularly among mammals, at both the generic and ordinal level. Out of a total of 34 mammalian genera represented within the study area, only 5 o1:er Pergtherium, Microgxgng, Viverravus, and Hgonsodus are Shared in common between the Little Muddy and the Desertion PO int local faunas. Table 15 presents a breakdown of the Inallfl'unals within the study area and their relative abundance 198 Table 15 IPercent composition of the Little Muddy local Fauna. The ruinimum number of individuals is used in calculating ordinal 19ercentages. number of specimens. Minimum number of individuals :Marsupalia Perathgrigg innominatum Insectivora Palaeosinona cf. g. lutreola Palaeictops bicuspis :Proprimates Iggggigg graxbullianus Microsyops sp. indet. Primates antiug cf. Q. frugivorous Copelemur cf. Q. australotutus Anemorhzgis cf. A” sublettensis (Zreodonta Carnivora Miacig latidens yglnavus profectus Viverravus sp. indet. C2c>ndylartha Meniscotherium chamense Meniscotherium sp. indet. Hzopsodus miticulus Hzopsodus wortmani T i llodontia Bethany; acutidens Ar tiodac tyla Diacodexis cf. 9. secans Perrisodactyla Hyracotherium vasacciense ngpdothgrium.nonoagacium R0 dentia Knightggxs depressus Parggxs cf. 2. excavatug In C ertae sedis Palaeanodon sp. indet. Totals LA) (9) U1 FJHFARJHPJFJW+4F*H£UF*HtQk)mr4F‘NFJFHflPAH The number in parentheses indicates the total Per cent of total fauna 2.9 14.7 14.8 11.9 100.0 199 Table 16. IPercent composition of the Desertion Point local Fauna. The ruinimum number of individuals is used in calculating ordinal 19ercentages. The number in parentheses indicates the total number of specimens. Minimum number Per cent of of individuals total fauna :Marsupalia 3 6.1 Pergtherium,gggg§gg§i l g. innomigggum 2 Insectivora 3(4) 6.1 Agategxs 1 ggenonaggg gdenensig 1 g. prisons 1(2) .Proprimates 3(4) 6.1 Microgxgng glegans 2 Microsyops sp. indet. 1(2) jPrimates 8(11) 16.3 flotharctgg robinsoni 3(4) gmilodectes mcgrgwi l Omogys carteri 2 washakigs insignia 1 Creodonta 1 2 . O (Searnivora 2 4.1 ‘Vivgrraggg grggilis l C2<3ndylartha l 2.0 Hyopsgdgs miticulus 1 'I?eaeniodontia 1 2.0 I?earrisodactyla 14(20) 28.7 Qrohinnus gumilus l Orohinpus sp. indet. l Palaeoszops of. g. fontinalig 2 Hzrachygs mgdestus 4 ggleneleteg sp. nov. 3(5) Rodentia 10(12) 20.5 ggiuraggs nitidus 5(7) Lentotomus cf. L. Huerfgnengis l L. parvug l Incertae Sedis 3 6.1 Mggachgirogxs sp. indet. 2 Tetragasgalug sp. indet. 1 Totals 49 (61) 99.9 200 iri the two faunal zones. The total sample is too small for a: statistically significant analysis, but some interesting t:rends are apparent. While no primate genera are shared between the VNasatchian and Bridgerian within the study area, generic diversity and overall abundance remain relatively constant. Perissodactyls comprise almost one third of the Desertion Point local fauna, and less than a tenth of the Little Muddy local fauna. Conversely, only a single condylarth has been identified from the Desertion Point local fauna, while they comprise approximately 15% of the Little Muddy local fauna. The most noticeable difference between the two faunas is the larger number of reptilian taxa in the Desertion lasint local fauna. The predominance of lower vertebrates in tihe Desertion Point local fauna may well have stronger eeczologic than biostratigraphic implications. The abundant meandering streams and minor incursions of Lake Gosiute czlnaracteristic of the Laney Member of the Green River .E?<:rmation and the lower Bridger Formation provided a variety <:>1f environments conducive to a large, diverse, reptilian iféaxuua. Reptiles and amphibians are usually not considered in ea-rly Tertiary biostratigraphic studies. While the InElnlflmalian faunas of the Huerfano, Wind River, Bighorn, and C335‘eeen River Basins have undergone almost continuous study if<:”1? the last century, the lower vertebrates have rarely been 201 Cliscussed. Many localities throughout the Green River Basin syuch as Desertion Point local fauna levels III and IV (zontain abundant reptile remains and only a few mammals. EStudies of both lower vertebrates and mammals will be essential if the biostratigraphy of the Green River Basin is to be completely understood. Most of the reptilian taxa found within the study area are found through much of the Palaeogene. Nevertheless, a single species of emydid, absent from higher levels was collected from Desertion Point local fauna level II. Eghmagegxs cf. g. cibollgngig noted above may be indicative of pre-Bridger A deposition. While the study area has yielded two distinct, Zbiostratigraphically diagnostic assemblages, the diversity (of both faunas is low compared to those of the Wind River and Huerfano Basins. Additional field work needs to be done t:<3 augment the sample of fossil vertebrates from the late IEEarly and early Middle Eocene of the southwestern Green Irztiver Basin. In addition, areas need to be sought where 't:3:ansitional faunas are preserved. Sedimentological earxridence indicates that if these faunas are preserved, they Should be sought along the margins of the basin, in regions ‘5711JLch escaped inundation by Eocene lake Gosiute. The palaeobotany of the Wasatch, Bridger and Green 12¢i:\rer Formations needs to be studied. This information may 'E>3:W:rvide important information about the paleoecology of the Gr‘een River Basin that is not available from other sources. 202 Iirvestigation of the stable isotope geochemistry of czarbonate nodules and organic material within paleosols sacross the boundary may shed light on paleoclimatic trends ifrom the early to the middle Eocene. Taphonomic studies ‘would clarify many of the differences between the Little iMuddy and Desertion Point local faunas. The collection of fossil vertebrates derived from the various stratigraphic units within the study area shows that preservation is not only in the quality of individual highly variable, fossils, but also in taxonomic diversity between horizons, the type of individual skeletal elements preserved, and in the proportions of large, medium and small taxa present Many of the differences between the two (Zonneveld, 1994). :faunas are based on taphonomic and paleoecologic factors Isather than community succession. From the study area to the northwest to Twin Buttes in an t:lne foothills of the Uinta Mountains to the southeast, .51Z1most continuous stratigraphic sequence is now known in the IE3nridger Basin temporally extending from the late early lEScacene (Wa7) to the late middle Eocene (Br3). Magneto— £3t:ratigraphic dating correlated with biostratigraphic information would help calibrate North American ‘3fl112:onostratigraphy with European and Asian. An impetus for future work in the area is that most eeéadtrly Tertiary biostratigraphic studies ignore the potential The fact that lower JTDUUE>ortance of amphibians and reptiles. 203 vertebrates are much more common from the upper levels than from the lower levels likely has stronger ecologic than biostratigraphic implications. As noted above however, there are differences in the reptilian taxa present at di :fferent levels. Additional study of the lower vertebrates is needed before their biostratigraphic significance can be a s certained . CONCLUSION For the first time, the Wasatchian—Bridgerian Land Mammal Age boundary has been identified within the vicinity Of their type areas. This boundary is represented by approximately 80 meters of stratigraphic section between two distinct faunas within the Desertion Point-Little Muddy area in the southwestern Bridger Basin, southwestern Wyoming. As the Early Eocene drew to a close, Lake Gosiute expanded, inundating most of the Green River Basin. This transgression deposited the thick sequence of lacustrine Sediments that comprises the Fontanelle Tongue of the Green River Formation and separates the Desertion Point and Little Muddy local faunas. As the waters receded, the valley was repopulated with a fauna markedly different from that which preceded the invasion of the lake. The biostratigraphic Wasatchian—Bridgerian boundary does not coincide with the lithostratigraphic Wasatch-Bridger boundary in southwestern Wyoming (see Figure 18) , the type area of both of these 204 Land—Mammal Ages. The Wasatchian—Bridgerian boundary is located approximately 200 meters below the base of the Bridger formation within the study area. Elements within the Little Muddy local fauna are indicative of late Wasatchian deposition, particularly the Lostcabinian index fossil Lambdotherium popoaggcig, but also Meniscotherium chamense, Miacis latidens, and Hyopsogus cf. _H_. worgmani. The time range of antius cf. Q. frugivorgus is extended to include the Lostcabinian; that of QM cf. Q. australotutus is confirmed as latest Wasatchian. The Chronologic and geographic ranges of Anflqrhxsig worgmani and m graxbulligug are extended to include the Lostcabinian of the Green River Basin. Elements from the Desertion Point local fauna are indicative of the early Bridgerian. Desertion Point local fauna level I through III are interpreted as earliest Bridgerian (Gardnerbuttean) based on the co-occurrence of W, W, and W. Desertion Point local fauna levels IV and V are interpreted as late Early Bridgerian based on the presence of Smilodggteg mcgrewi, .Notharctug robinsoni, Washakius insignia, Onions cartgri, and §cengpgggs along with Palaeggxons fontgngllis and W modggtgs. The known time range of W is extended to the early Bridgerian. APPENDIX 205 APPENDIX MEASURED STRATIGRAPHIC SECTIONS Stratigraphic sections were measured using Jacob Staff, 1E3czrunton Compass, and metric tape-measure. Brief <51riel, 8.5., 1962, Main body of Wasatch Formation Near La Barge, Wyoming, Bull. Amer. Assoc. Petr. Geol., 46(12): 2161-2173. (Ctriel, 8.5., and Tracy, J.I., 1970, Uppermost Cretaceous and Tertiary Stratigraphy of Fossil Basin, Southwestern wyoming. U.S.G.S. Prof. Paper 635: 1-53. ()53kmmnq H.F., 1929, The Titanotheres of Ancient Wyoming, Dakota, and Nebraska. U.S. Geol. Surv. Monograph 55: 953p. I?eagge, M.L., and Burr, M.B., 1991, Freshwater Fishes. Peterson Field Guide Series vol. 42, Houghton-Mifflin Co. Boston, p.29—32. F’jtlsbry, H.A., 1946, Land Mollusca of North America (North of Mexico). Acad. Nat. Sci. Philedelphia Mon. 3, II(1): 1—520. I>Iledge, N.S., 1969, Paleoenvironments and Paleoecology of part of the Lower Bridger Formation, South of Opal, wyoming [M.S. Thesis], Laramie, Wyoming, University of Wyoming, 74p. Radinsky, L.B. , 1963, Origin and Early Evolution of North American Tapiroidea. Bull. Peabody Mus. Nat Hist. 17: 1-115. IRadinsky, L.B., 1966a, The Adaptive Radiation of the Phenacodontid Condylarths and the Origin of the Perissodactyla. Evolution 20: 408—417. IRadinsky, L.B., 1966b, A New Genus of Early Eocene Tapiroid (Mammalia, Perissodactyla). J. Paleo., 40: 740-742. lRadinsky, L.B., 1967, Byzachxps, Chagpptherium, and the Early Evolution of Helaletid Tapiroids. Amer. Mus. Nov. 2313: 1-23. ?Rage, J.C., 1977, An Erycinine Snake (Boidae) of the Genus Calamagras from the French lower Eocene, with Comments on the Phylogeny of the Erycinae. Herpetologica 33(4): 459-463. 243 Richardson, R.E., 1928, The Bottom Fauna of the Illinois River, Illinois, 1919-1925. Illinois Nat. Hist. Surv., Bull., 17(12): 387-475. Robinson, P., 1957., The Species of Notharctus from the Middle Eocene. Yale Peabody Mus. Postilla, 28: 1-27. Robinson, P., 1966, Fossil Mammalia of the Huerfano Formation, Eocene, of Colorado. Bull. Yale Peabody Mus. flW-i Nat. Hist. 21:1-95. Roehler, H.W., 1965, Early Tertiary Depositional Environmen ts in the Rock Springs ' u Uplift Area, ip: Devoto, R.H., and Bitter, R.K., eds., Sedimentat ion of Late Cretaceous and Tertiary Outcrops. Rock Springs Uplift: Wyoming Geol. Assoc. Guidebook, 19th Field Conference , Casper, Wyoming: 140-150. Roehler, H.W., 1992, Correlation, Composition, Areal Distribution, and Thickness of Eocene Stratigraphic Units, Greater Green River Basin, Wyoming, Utah and Colorado, United States Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 1506-E: 1-49. Rose, K.D., 1981, The Clarkforkian Land-Mammal Age and Diversity across the Palaeocene-Eocene Boundary. Univ. Mich, Pap. Paleo., 26: 1-197. 244 Rose, K.D., 1982, Skeleton of Diacodexis, Oldest Known Artiodactyl. Science, 216: 621-623. Rose, K.D., 1985, Comparative Osteology of North American Dichobunid Artiodactyls. Jour. Paleontology 59(5): 1203-1206. Rose, K.D., and Emry, R.J., 1983, Extraordinary Fossorial Adaptations in the Oligocene Palaeanodonts Epoicotherium and Xgnocranium (Mammalia). Jour. Morph. 175: 33-56. Rose, K.D., and Walker, A., 1985, The Skeleton of Early Eocene Cantius, Oldest Lemuriform Primate. Am. Jour. Phys. Anthro., 66: 73-89. Rubey, W.W., 1955, Early Structural History of the Overthrust Belt of Western Wyoming and Adjacent States: Wyoming Geological Association Guidebook, 15th Annual Field Conference: 125-126. Schaeffer, B., 1947, Notes on the Origin and Function of the Artiodactyl Tarsus. 1356: 1-24. h 245 Schankler, D.M., 1980, Faunal Zonation of the Central Bighorn Basin, Wyoming. Univ. Mich. Pap. Paleo., 24:99- 114. Schultz, A.R., 1920, Oil Possibilities In and Around Baxter Basin, in the Rock Springs Uplift, Sweetwater County, Wyoming, United States Geol. Surv. Bull., 702: 24-29. Setoguchi, T., 1975, Paleontology and Geology of the Badwater Creek Area, Central Wyoming. Part 11. Late Eocene Marsupials. Ann. Carnegie Mus., 45: 263-275. Shuster, M.W., and Steidtmann, J.R., 1988, Tectonic and Sedimentary Evolution of the northern Green River Basin, Western wyoming, Geological Survey of America Memoir 171: 515-529. Simons E.L., 1962, A New Eocene Primate Genus Cantius and a Revision of some Allied European Lemuroids. Bull. Brit. Mus. Nat. Hist. Geol., 7:1-36 Simpson, G.G., 1930, Allogppthosuphus mooki, a new crocodile from the Puerco Formation. Amer. Mus. Nov. 445: 1-16. Simpson, G.G., 1931, Metacheirogzs and the Edentata. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 59: 295-381. Simpson, G.G., 1945, The Principles of Classification and a Classification of Mammals. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 85: 1-350. Simpson, G.G., 1948, The Eocene of the San Juan Basin, New Mexico. Amer. Jour. Sci., vol. 246: 257-282; 363-385. Simpson, G.G., 1959, two New Records from the Bridger Middle Eocene of Tabernacle Butte, Wyoming. Amer. Mus. Nov. 1966: 5p. Sinclair, W.J., 1914, A Revision of the Bunodont Artiodactyla of the Middle and Lower Eocene of North America. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 33: 267-295. Stucky, R.K., 1984a, Revision of the Wind River Faunas. Early Eocene of Central Wyoming. Part 5. Geology and Biostratigraphy of the Upper Part of the Wind River Formation. Northeastern Wind River Basin. Ann. Carnegie Mus. 53(9): 231-294. Stucky, R.K., 1984b, The Wasatchian-Bridgerian Land Mammal Age Boundary (Early to Middle Eocene) in Western North America. Ann. Carnegie Mus. 53(12): 347-382. I. U'L'W-Iflww . "- 1 a 246 Stucky, R.K., and Krishtalka, L., 1983, Revision of the Wind River Faunas, Early Eocene of Central Wyoming. Part 4. The Tillodontia. Ann. Carnegie Mus. 52(17): 375-391. Stucky, R.K., and Krishtalka, L., 1990, Revision of the Wind River Faunas, Early Eocene of Central Wyoming. Part 10. Bunpphorous (Mammalia, Artiodactyla) Ann. Carnegie Mus. 59(2): 149-171. Sullivan, R.M., 1979, Revision of the Palaeogene genus Glyptosaurus (Reptilia, Anguidae), Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 163(1): 1-72. Sullivan, R., 1980, A Stratigraphic Evaluation of the Eocene Rocks of Southwestern Wyoming: Geological Survey of Wyoming, Report of Investigations 20: 1-50. Surdam, R.C., and Wolfbauer, C.A., 1975, Green River Formation, Wyoming: playa-lake complex. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., 86: 335-345. Surdam, R.C., and Wray, J.L., 1976, Lacustrine Stromatolites, Eocene Green River Formation, Wyoming (Lake Gosiute only), ip Stromatolites (M.R. Walter ed.), Elsevier, p.535-541. Swain, F.M., 1964, Early Tertiary Freshwater Ostracoda from Colorado, Nevada, and Utah, and their stratigraphic distribution. Jour. Paleo., 38(2): 256-280. Szalay, F.S., 1969, Mixodectidae, Microsyopidae, and the Insectivore-Primate Transition. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 140(4): 194-330. Szalay, F.S., 1976, Systematics of the Omomyidae (Tarsiiformes, Primates) Taxonomy, Phylogeny, and Adaptations. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 156(3): 157- 450. Szalay, F.S., and Delson, E., 1979, Evolutionary History of the Primates. Academic Press, 580p. Taylor, D.W., and Sohl, N., 1962, An Outline of Gastropod Classification. Macalogia, 1(1): 7-33. Troxell, E.L., 1925, The Bridger Crocodilians, Amer. Jour. Sci., ser. 5, 9: 29-72. Turnbull, W.D., 1978, The Mammalian Faunas of the Washakie Formation, Eocene Age, of Southern wyoming. Pt. 1: Introduction: The Geology, History, and Setting. Fieldiana: Geol. 33: 569-601. 247 Van Valen, L. 1967, New Palaeocene Insectivores and West, West, West, West, West, West, West, West, West, Insectivore Classification. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 135(5): 218—284. R.M., 1969, Biostratigraphy of Fluvial Sediments of the Upper Wasatch formation in the Northern Green River Basin, Wyoming. Univ. Wyoming. Contrib. Geol. 8: 184- 196. R.M., 1970, Sequence of Mammalian Faunas of Eocene Age in the Northern Green River Basin, wyoming. Jour. Paleo., 14: 142-147. ' R.M., 1973, Geology and Mammalian Paleontology of the New Fork- Big Sandy Area, Sublette County, wyoming. Fieldiana: Geology 29: 1-193. R.M., 1976, Paleontology and Geology of the Bridger Formation, Southern Green River Basin, southwestern Wyoming. Part 1. History of Field Work and geological setting, Milwaukee Public Museum, Contrib. Biol. Geol. 7: 1-12. R.M., 1979, Paleontology and Geology of the Bridger Formation, Southern green River Basin, Southwestern wyoming. Part 3. Notes on Hyopsodus. Contrib. Biol. Geol. Milwaukee Public Mus., 25: 1-52. R.M., 1984, Paleontology and Geology of the Bridger Formation, Southern Green River Basin, Wyoming. Part 7. Survey of Bridgerian Artiodactyla, Including Description of a Skull and Partial Skeleton of Antiacodpn gxgppppg. Contrib. Biol. Geol., Milwaukee Public Mus., 56:1-47. . R.M., 1990, Vertebrate Paleontology of the Green river Basin, wyoming, 1840-1910: Earth Science History, 9(1): 45—56. R.M., and Dawson, M.R., 1973, Fossil Mammals from the Upper Part of he Cathedral Bluffs Tongue of the Wasatch Formation (Early Bridgerian), Northern Green River Basin, wyoming. Univ. Wyoming Contrib. Geol., 12:33-41. R.M., and Hutchinson, J.H., 1981, Geology and Paleontology of the Bridger Formation, Southern Green River Basin, Southwestern Wyoming. Pt 6: The fauna and Correlation of Bridger E. Milwaukee Pub. Mus. Contrib. Biol. Geol., 46: 1-8. . I}, 248 Wiley, E.O., 1976, The Phylogeny and Biogeography of Fossil and Recent Gars (Actinopterygii, Lepisosteidae). Univ Kansas Mus. Nat Hist. Misc. Publ., 64: 1-111. Wilson, R.W., 1938, Review of some Rodent Genera from the Bridger Eocene. Amer. Jour. Sci., ser.5, 35: 123-137 Wilson, R.W., 1940, Californian Paramyid Rodents. Carn. Inst. Washington Publ., 514: 59-83. Wood, A.E., 1959, Rodentia. IQ The Geology and Paleontology of the Elk Mountain and Tabernacle Butte Area, Wyoming, (P.O McGrew ed.). Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 117: 157-169. Wood, A.E., 1962, The Early Tertiary Rodents of the Family Paramyidae, Trans. Amer. Phil. Soc. 52(1): 1:261. Wood, A.E., 1965, Small Rodents from the early Eocene Lysite Member, Wind River Formation of Wyoming. Jour. Paleo. 39: 124-134. Wood, C.B., 1966, Stratigraphy and Paleontology of the Bridger Formation Northeast of Opal, Lincoln County, Wyoming [M.S. Thesis]: Laramie, Wyoming, University of Wyoming, 112p. Wood, H.E., 1934, Revision of the Hyrachyidae. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 67(5): 181-295. Wood, H.E., Chaney, R.W., Clark, J., Colbert, E.H., Jepsen, G.L., Reeside, J.B. Jr., and Stock, C., 1941, Nomenclature and Correlation of the North American Continental Tertiary. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer. 52: 1-48. Woodburne, M.O., editor, 1987, Cenozoic Mammals of North America: Geochronology and Biostratigraphy, Berkeley and Los Angeles, Univ Calif Press, 336p. Wortman, J.L., 1896, Species of szapotherium and allied Perissodactyl from the Wahsatch and Wind River Beds of North America. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 8: 81-110. Wortman, J.L., 1901, Studies of Eocene Mammalia in the Marsh Collection, Peabody Museum. Am. Jour. Sci. 6: 333—348, 437-450, 7: 193-206, 281-296, 377-382, 421-432. Zonneveld, J-P., 1994, Differential Preservation of Fossil Vertebrates in the Eocene Wasatch, Bridger, and Green River Formations of Southwestern Wyoming, Geol. Soc. Amer., Abs. with Prog. (in press). (9%] Z onneOCH 350— {”3 300 I -.' I]I .I‘ x l r . " ’«4 1:» ’..'—s-. _.-\' ."‘_u I h I”; I I I [I \‘l llltllilX II [I 250 (I) ., m in: Whiskey Butte Bed Bridger Fm. Craven Creek Bed Laney Member Green River Fm. Upper Member Wasatch Fm. 200— Upper Member Wasatch Fm. 50* an- ........ “ New Fork Tongue '1‘ Wasatch Fm. -L--'xi'- .. .v .... Wilkins Peak Miember Green River Fm. 40m “buried ........ Fontenelle Tongue Green River Fm. New Fork Tongue Wasatch Fm. Fontenelle Tongue Green River Fm. La Barge Member Wasatch Fm. PLATE 2. CORRELATION OF MEASURED STRATIGRAPHIC SECTIONS WITHIN THE EOCENE WASATCH, GREEN RIVER AND BRIDGER FORMATIONS, LINCOLN AND UINTA COUNTIES, WYOMING. Section ‘A' from Bartels, l989-I992, unpublish field notes. In part after M'Gonigle and Dover, 1992. MN 16° PLATE 1. GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE DESERTION 1'36 820 POINT-LITTLE MUDDY AREA,SOUTHWESTERN T-ZON- 11 — o 1 2 I 3 4 “5 GREEN RIVER BASIN, WYOMING. Tgw “9" Kilometers CENOZOIC Twu Bridger Formation -Whiskey Butte Bed R.ll6w. R.|l5w. Green River Formation -Craven Creek Bed, Laney Member K -Wilkins Peak Member . e R Tsrwn .. Ai‘ i — A e . a e. e g c |Tgf iFontenelle Tongue FL Tap Hat Butte - , Wasatch Formation -Upper Member 9‘3 wa -New Fork Tongue 6 Desertion Point -La large member MESOZOIC Tglc -Undifferentiated Cretaceous Lincoln CO men. u Uinta CO . TW“ Measured Section I2 Big ”m" " ~c .9 _‘ Cont ct IA Butte I0\/ gm; - a I '° Tglc H s we I .U\ 8 ”WCJQI m .01 fl WNI 0 Z “IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII