1J3 .. . 4.33.3... 3.33333” .n , . .. .... $3...“ . 33.3%; 3 33.... . £3.43... . . . . . s: . n3 . , 3 a 5m .0 1 . . 3n . 5 1 x 7. 3L . . .... n 1......” H 33:53:... 2. .3. : on .I ‘2. . z . . 35:... .351}! .. .. #2.? J. . m3... ..9..M {u} 3. 3.3.3.}... kw» v . I . . umma... wufimxhtnmvva 2. L331... .53.! 1.9.1.. .5123..- —" hr 3. . . . . u .l r! . . . 4%.”un {I}; figmrmumwm. 3:... .uhflAIYx )1: 3...... any... . k”... i 2.... 3.. z :5... 39.290“ x 9 to! .31. x a 3... a v3. _ 5...“... . 9: hurt». 1H::..... 3...... 5.5111931: 39 m1. ,3! 21:1: 1' a... 3 .1)... .3: I:I.1. ax} . (It 92:20.0113 :12: f. )9. u}.lzltl.a3$ xv- “ s 1“ IO... ura. xix .2..’t.ll.~\. :1. . .. \nn . v)|.\nt-f. Ill/i” I 7‘ Wm UBRARIES Jill lull/llill/uiii/Iii ' / 93 01046 5387 A? This is to certify that the dissertation entitled CULTURAL POLITICS OF DISEASE CONTROL: STATE-COMMUNITY RELATIONS IN THE STRUGGLES AGAINST MALARIA IN THE PHILIPPINES presented by Eufracio Cubacub Abaya has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for Ph ° D ° degree in Wgy Major professor 1)..er Oat. 1444 MS U is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Institution 0- 12771 LIBRARY Michigan State University PLACER RETURN BOXMMMWMMMWMM. TO AVOID FiNESMum worm-duo“. DATE DUE DATE DUE DATE DUE MSU isAnMimdivoAflion/EWOWIW mm: CULTURAL POLITICS OF DISEASE CONTROL: STATE-CONIMUNITY RELATIONS IN THE STRUGGLES AGAINST MALARIA IN THE PHILIPPINES By Eufracio Cubacub Abaya A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Anthropology 1 994 ABSTRACT CULTURAL POLITICS OF DISEASE CONTROL: STATE-COMMUNITY RELATIONS IN THE STRUGGLES AGAINST MALARIA IN THE PHILIPPINES By Eufracio Cubacub Abaya This dissertation addresses the dynamics of domination, conformity, and resistance in the struggles against malaria involving the state health functionaries and an Ilokano community in northeastern Luzon, Philippines, in the early 19905. It analyzes these dynamics in terms of the concept of cultural politics, defined as the encounters of power-laden cultural schemas taking place in contestations over definitions of and responses to social reality at a given time. Using historical records, this study describes the key features of the schema of malaria control espoused by the state. The analysis shows that the schema upholds a well-entrenched epidemiological orientation, adheres to a top-down health policy formulation and implementation, champions the rhetoric of ”malaria blocks economic development,” and depends heavily on financial and technical assistance from international health and development agencies. Using surveys, interviews, and participant observation, this inquiry analyzes the llokanos’ cultural understandings of the body, health, sickness, and healing. In practice, these understandings indicate the rootedness of the physical presentations of sickness such as malaria in the social and moral spheres of daily experience. Moreover, these understandings have resulted in the reconfiguration at the local level of the definitions of malaria, including the global antimalarial strategies such as spraying of houses with insecticides, treatment of bed nets with pesticides, environmental engineering, case finding and treatment, and community participation. Grounded in asymmetrical power relations, the encounters between the state health functionaries and the Ilokanos reflect the contradictions between the state schema of malaria control and the Ilokano ethnomedical knowledge and practices. These contradictions contribute to the persistence of local apathy, ambivalence, and resistance towards the official antimalarial strategies. This study of the cultural politics of the state-community relations in the arena of disease control aims to contribute to the current discourse on the inseparability of culture, power, and history. Copyright by EUFRACIO C. ABAYA 1994 To my late Tatang and Inang, for their enduring commitment to the education of their children ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The United Nations Development Program/World Bank/World Health Organization Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases provided financial support for both my graduate studies at Michigan State University (MSU) and field research in the Philippines. The Department of Anthropology, University of the Philippines, allowed me to take a leave of absence from teaching and concentrate on my graduate studies. The Department of Anthropology, MSU, also provided financial assistance for my graduate work. The Institute of International Health, MSU, allowed me to use their office facilities. I am most grateful for their generosity. To my guidance committee--Drs. Ann V. Millard (co-chair), Herbert Whittier (co—chair), Harry Raulet, and Judy Pugh-~thanks for being unstinting with your time and patient in your mentoring. I acknowledge Dr. Jeff Riedinger, Department of Political Science, MSU, for serving as the dean’s representative during my dissertation defense. I benefitted immensely from his thoughtful comments. I owe special gratitude to the people of Masipi and to many friends and acquaintances in various offices of the Philippine Department of Health for making field work an enriching and unforgettable experience. I am also grateful to Dr. Realidad S. Rolda, former chair of the Department of Anthropology, University of vi the Philippines, for her sustained support while I was conducting field work in the Philippines. I extend my special thanks to Michael C. Ennis-McMillan and Martin Manalansan IV for helping me Shape and sharpen my arguments. To Dr. Donna Chollett, Walter Russyk, Suparna Braskaran, Krishnakali Majumdar, and David Canales-Portalatin, I am grateful for their comments on earlier versions of this dissertation. Vandana Goswami and Min Chuan Yang joined me in confronting the challenges of dissertation writing. My efforts would not have come into fruition, however, without the unfailing support of my two field assistants (Jessie and Marlyn), my relatives (sister Gee and her husband, Alex; sister Faina; brother Lex; nephew Ernie; niece Gina; nephew Jonathan; grandniece Detdet; sister Fely and her husband, Ron; nephew Dan; brother Doti and his wife, Robin; niece Jo; and nephew Andre), my friends in the Philippines (Dr. Emma Porio, Che Cheng-Dominguez, Boy Dominguez, Ernie Acosta, Linda Bulong, Orly Turingan, Tess Guanzon, Mary-Ann Octaviano, Pearl Patacsil, and Dr. Edmond Dames), and my friends in the US. (Drs. Pat and Herb Whittier, Drs. Isidore Flores and Ann V. Millard, David Canales-Portalatin and Michael C. Ennis- McMillan, Sonia Padilla and Ron Dietz, Charito Bermejo and David Adrikovich, Martin Manalansan IV, Dr. Donna Chollett, Dr. Renato Linsangan, Dr. Cheribeth Tan, Sue Saguiguit, JoAnn Palma, Glenda Soriano, Dr. Rudie Altamirano and Let Carpio-Altamirano, Rene Cerdena, Zandro Martinez, Manny Viray, Lilian Gadrinab, and Rey Ebora). To all of them, I owe a lifelong debt. vii PREFACE My engagement with the anthropology of disease control began in 1985 when, as a member of the faculty of the Department of Anthropology at the University of the Philippines, I was invited to participate in a WHO-sponsored research project on malaria in my country. Focusing on the knowledge, attitudes, and practice (KAP) of communities with respect to malaria and its control in Cabagan, Isabela, the research examined the extent to which people’s KAP cohered with that of the state’s antimalarial program. The research was predicated on the assumption that the results would constitute a vital input to health policy formulation and implementation. In particular, the results of the research were considered to be useful in designing health education strategies to ”modify" people’s ”erroneous" KAP and, consequently, generate wider community acceptance of state-instituted antimalarial strategies borne of the knowledge claims of biomedicine and the biomedical sciences, as well as of the economic and political goals of national and international health and development programs. This dissertation radically departs from that previous investigation. It represents my effort to avoid a stance that privileges biomedical knowledge and practice over other culturally specific forms of knowledge and practice, a stance that elides the issue of power that inheres in the interactions between the so-called "health providers" and ”target beneficiaries,” and, finally, a stance that ignores the viii embeddedness of social dynamics in historical processes. In addressing these compelling issues, I drew inspiration from interpretive and critical perspectives in social anthropology as applied in the arena of health and suffering. I have, for instance, followed the lead to ”denaturalize" biomedicine by designating it as a social and cultural domain. This orientation made me more sensitive to the ways in which the culture of biomedicine interacted with the local cultural forms; and, by extension, to practices of domination, conformity, and resistance engendered by these interactions. 1 turned my attention to the ways in which the structure and orientation of the antimalarial program condition and, in turn, are themselves reproduced through, the encounters of the antimalarial program actors with the Ilokanos in malaria-endemic settlements in Cabagan, Isabela. Analytically, I viewed these activities as manifestations of cultural politics--that is, the dynamics of meaning and power in socially situated negotiations and renegotiations over definitions of reality. Having framed the workings of the antimalarial program in terms of the notion of cultural politics, the dissertation can be considered as falling under the rubric of studies that regard health and suffering as key loci for the investigation of the interplay of culture, power, and history. The process of writing this dissertation, I must admit, was punctuated by difficulties arising from the intellectual and personal experience of an author as a positioned observer. For instance, I had to confront the raging issue of objectivity versus subjectivity in social scientific writing by meshing survey data and historical accounts with transcripts of interviews and discourses obtained in actual encounters among the health workers and the villagers. ix The virtue of reflexivity in my study of the struggles against malaria lies in the fact that it led me to reexamine the extent to which ethical and moral orientations have influenced the course of this project, given the social milieu of my field work and academic pursuits. My being a member of academe, the empathy I have with people in subordinated groups, the financial support for my doctoral studies from the World Health Organization (a key participant in the arena of international health and development) and my being an Ilokano, all contributed to the dilemma of being deeply engaged with the politics of writing. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables xiii List of Figures xiv Chapter One: INTRODUCTION ............................................................... 1 The Problem and Theoretical Concerns ............................................... 1 Cultural Politics and Social Theory ........................................... 4 Notes on Malaria Studies in the Philippines ................................. 7 Chapter Two: METHODS AND RESEARCH SETTING .............................. 12 Data Gathering Strategies .............................................................. 12 Historical Research ............................................................. 12 Ethnographic Research ......................................................... 13 Representations of Masipi .............................................................. 26 Supralocal Representations .................................................... 26 Infralocal Representations ..................................................... 31 Chapter Three: THE PHILIPPINE ANTIMALARIAL PROGRAM THROUGH TIME .......................................................... 38 The American Colonial Administration (1898-1935): "Beginnings of the Battle Against Malaria" ................................ 39 The Commonwealth Period (1935-1945): "The Campaign Deteriorates" ................................................ 48 The Post-Colonial Period (1946-1990s): "Shifts from Control to Eradication to Control" .......................... 50 Concluding Remarks .................................................................... 69 Chapter Four: MALARYA IN OUR MIDST .............................................. 71 Ilokano Ethnomedical Knowledge and Practices ................................... 72 The Fate of Ligaya ............................................................. 73 Experiencing Mam .......................................................... 79 Concluding Remarks .................................................................... 95 xi Chapter Five: ENCOUNTERS OF CULTURAL SCHEMAS ......................... 96 Antimalarial Program-Community Dynamics ...................................... 97 Disseminating Official Knowledge: Voices from Above ............................................................ 98 Local Participation Needed ......................................... 106 Malaria Control and Economic Progress ......................... 107 Contracting Malaria and Everyday Routines .................... 109 Surveillance and Submission ....................................... 110 Dispelling "Local Misconceptions” ............................... 111 Mosquitoes as Culprit ............................................... 112 Which Mosquito? ..................................................... 113 Plasmodia-Mosquito Connection ................................... 114 Deciphering and Treating Malaria ................................. 114 Malaria ls Fatal and More: Scare Tactics ........................ 116 Reconstituting the Bed Nets ......................................... 117 Official Malaria Control Measures ................................ 119 Instilling a Sense of Community Responsibility ................. 121 Personal and Collective Obligation ................................ 122 Contesting Resistance to House Spraying ........................ 123 Undermining the Reserba Mentality ............................... 125 K-Othrine is Safe ..................................................... 127 Presuming People’s Acceptance ................................... 128 Concluding Remarks ................................................. 131 Responses to the Malaria Control Program: Voices from Below ............................................................ 133 House Spraying ....................................................... 133 Case Finding .......................................................... 139 Drug Distribution ..................................................... 141 Community Participation ............................................ 142 Concluding Remarks ................................................. 149 Chapter Six: CONCLUSIONS .............................................................. 151 Truth Claims and Malaria: The Limits of Cultural Domination and Resistance .................................................. 151 Appendix ......................................................................................... 159 Bibliography ..................................................................................... 161 xii Table 1. Table 2. Table 3. Table 4. Table 5. Table 6. Table 7. Table 8. Table 9. Table 10. Table 11. Table 12. Table 13. Table 14. Table 15. Table 16. Table 17. Table 18. Table 19. Table 20. Table 21. Table 22. Table 23. Table 24. Table 25. Table 26. Table 27. Table 28. Table 29. Table 30. Table 31. Table 32. Table 33. LIST OF TABLES Offices, hospitals, and clinics visited ............................................. 15 Sample population ................................................................... 22 Age of respondents .................................................................. 23 Birthplace of respondents ........................................................... 23 Educational attainment of respondents ........................................... 24 Principal occupation of respondents .............................................. 25 Health-related legislation promulgated during the early U.S. Occupation ............................................................................ 43 Malaria control and related activities during the rehabilitation period (1946-1950) .................................................................. 55 Bilateral and multilateral foreign aid agencies and private foundations ........................................................................... 57 Reasons that malaga is dreaded .................................................. 81 Reasons that malaga is not dreaded ............................................. 81 Cases of malaria reported in each household in the last year ............... 82 Causes of specific cases of mm in the household ........................ 84 Reasons that villagers are vulnerable to m .............................. 85 Reasons that nobody in the household has had m ...................... 87 How mam is transmitted ....................................................... 88 Measures to prevent malaga ...................................................... 89 Characteristics of tyempo iti malma ............................................ 90 Therapies for mam .............................................................. 91 Biomedical drugs .................................................................... 92 Plant medicines ...................................................................... 93 Purposes of spraying ............................................................... 134 Duration of the efficacy of the pesticide ....................................... 135 Reasons that households submit to house spraying ........................... 136 Reasons that households refuse house spraying ............................... 136 Reasons that the pesticide is washed off ....................................... 137 Reasons for collecting blood smears ............................................ 140 Whether the residents can control mama .................................... 143 Reasons why villagers cannot control mama ................................ 144 Activities that residents can do to control mam ........................... 145 Whether health personnel and residents should become partners .......... 146 Activities of residents and health workers to control malarya .............. 147 Reasons that partnership is not feasible ......................................... 148 xiii Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 3. Figure 4. Figure 5. Figure 6. Figure 7. Figure 8. Figure 9. Figure 10. Figure 11. LIST OF FIGURES Municipality of Cabagan in lsabela Province, Philippines ................... 14 Research Sites: Magallones, Compra, and Sagpat ............................ 16 Magallones ........................................................................... 17 Compra ............................................................................... 18 Sagpat ................................................................................. 19 Outdoor Economic Activities, Malaria Transmission, and Mosquito Density ............................................................................... 20 Forest Concessions in the Cagayan Valley .................................... 28 Distribution of Malaria in the Philippines ...................................... 32 Organizational Structure of the Philippine Public Health Rehabilitation Program .............................................................................. 52 Organizational Structure of the Philippine Malaria Eradication Program .............................................................................. 63 Organizational Structure of the Malaria Control Program ................... 68 xiv Chapter One INTRODUCTION The Problem and Theoretical Concerns In the Philippines today, malaria persists despite several decades of state-led, nationwide antimalarial efforts. The state attributes this failure partly to its difficulty in ensuring local participation in antimalarial activities. Through shifting approaches and strategies, the state continues to contend with people’s responses ranging from ambivalence to outright refusal to involve themselves in antimalarial activities. This study examines this problem in terms of the concept of cultural politics. By cultural politics1 I mean the encounters of power-laden cultural schemas2 in contestations over the definition and management of life circumstances. These contestations, by extension, engender practices of domination, conformity, and resistance. This study characterizes the historically grounded precepts that underlie the 1Ortner (1989az200) provides a complementary definition, that is, "the struggles over the official symbolic representations of reality that shall prevail in a given social order at a given time. " 2In espousing the notion of power-laden cultural schemas, I am following the position of Comaroff and Comaroff (1992:28) in regard to the prevailing criticism leveled against cultural analyses that fail to "add" power into the equation. This criticism contends that power "determines why some signs are dominant, others not; why some practices seem to be consensual, others disputed-even when they are backed by the technology of terror " (1992:28). While subscribing to this general point, both authors argue that "power is not above, nor outside of, culture and history, but it is directly implicated in their constitution and determination. It cannot, therefore, be ’added’ to them " (Ibidz28). They argue that power and culture are inseparable in that "power is an intrinsic quality of the social and the cultural; in short, their determining capacity" (Ibidz28). 2 divergent ways malaria is understood and dealt with by the state health functionaries and by the Ilokano-speaking farmers and wage laborers residing in a malaria-endemic area in northeastern Luzon. I examine how these precepts, situated and actualized within characteristic power relations, configure the social encounters between the Ilokanos and the state-paid health workers. My purpose is to show how the obstacles encountered by the state health apparatus in advancing its antimalarial activities in a given social setting are embedded in superordinate-subordinate relations between the government health functionaries and the Ilokanos. In casting the problems of the Philippine antimalarial program in terms of cultural politics, my analysis asserts that cultural forms and their expressions are socially contested or negotiated. This study, therefore, focuses on the processes of contestation over the official antimalarial program run by the state, under the auspices of international health and development agencies. Specifically, it examines the contested character of meaningful cultural forms such as the body, malaria, sickness, therapy, and disease control. This analytic stance, however, does not deny the shared nature of cultural forms. Yet, in recognizing culture as shared, it asks, following Dirks et al. (1994), "By whom?” and ”In what ways?” and "Under what conditions?" As a concept, cultural politics is useful for directing attention to superordinate- subordinate relations in a given social setting. In this study, I focus on the encounters between the Ilokanos and various state institutions and agencies, particularly the health care bureaucracy. I posit the following questions: In what ways and under what conditions has the state been addressing the problem of malaria among the Ilokanos? In what ways and under what conditions have the Ilokanos been responding to that state initiative? These questions speak to the workings of ideology3 and social control in the cultural politics of the antimalarial campaign. In broad terms, ideology comprises the doctrines and precepts espoused by a particular social group in terms of which the social world is interpreted. Social control refers to the ways of enforcing public conformity with socially prescribed modes of action (cf. Waitzkin 1991:7). In this study, I view the antimalarial program partly as a medium expressing an ideology of the state’s health bureaucracy. To achieve public conformity, the state creates and maintains structures and mechanisms for social control, notably, its organized health system that advances antimalarial strategies, which entail surveillance and control of "target” communities. This process is shaped by a system of power relations that interact with and sometimes subjugate precepts and practices of the community. In practice and through time, the state’s official modes of defining and dealing with malaria have to contend with the ethnomedical knowledge and practice of the target communities. One aim of this study is to examine the interplay between the state’s 3My conception of ideology is informed by that of Williams’s which regards ideology as "an articulated system of meanings, values, and beliefs of a kind that can be abstracted as [the] ’worldview’ any social grouping subscribes to..." (1977:109). Moreover, I subscribe to Comaroff and Comaroff’s (1992:29) assertion that [t]he regnant ideology of any period or place will be that of the dominant group, although the degree of its preeminence may vary a good deal; so also, will the extent to which it is empowered by the instrumental force of the state. But other, subordinate populations have ideologies. And, insofar as they try to assert themselves, to gain some control over the terms in which the world is ordered, they too will actively call upon them--even if only to clash their symbols. [italics added] 4 ideology and the ideology of the Ilokanos.4 Cultural Politim and Social Theory Until recently, issues of ”resistance to modern health care,” now redefined as "resistance to scientific medical bureaucracies” have been primarily explained in terms of "lack of fit” between biomedicine and ”folk" medicine (see Foster and Anderson 1978; Paul 1955). This approach to medical encounters, which is apparently informed by modernization theory, has been criticized for not only suspending epistemological scrutiny of biomedicine but also for its inattention to local and global power relations that produce and shape sickness (Morsy 1990). Arguing against analyses that regard biomedicine as a natural system, Kleinman (1978) views biomedicine as a cultural system in and of itself. He explains the problems arising from clinical encounters as resulting from the limitations of the physical reductionism inherent in biomedicine in dealing with the experiential underpinnings of other culturally constructed ethnomedicines. Kleinman’s concept of "explanatory model"5 has proved to be a useful analytic device to examine clinical 4This view relates to a point made by Comaroff and Comaroff (1992:29), stating that the ideologies of subordinated groups are kindled by contradictions, "contradictions that a prevailing culture no longer hides. " This stance resonates with that of Williams (19772109), who argued that [a] lived hegemony is always a process. It is not, except analytically, a system or a structure. It is a realized complex of experiences, relationships, and activities, with specific and changing pressures and limits. In practice, that is, hegemony can never be singular.... It has continually to be renewed, recreated, defended, and modified. It is also continually resisted, limited, altered, challenged by pressures not at all its own. We have then to add to the concept of hegemony the concepts of counter-hegemony and alternative hegemony, which are real and persistent elements of practice. 5He defines the notion of explanatory model as a set of beliefs which "contains any or all of five issues: etiology. onset of symptoms, pathophysiology, course of sickness and 5 encounters. It calls attention to the divergent definitions of reality that come into play in clinical encounters. The "explanatory model" approach, however, has been questioned for focusing on the individual as the object and locus of significant events, a feature of biomedicine that Kleinman and his followers criticize (e.g., Good 1977, 1986; Good and Del-Vecchio Good 1982). Young (1982) argues against the use of explanatory models of illness as the primary source of explanation for the surface meaning of an individual’s statements. In his view, individuals appropriate different kinds of socially determined and dialectically related knowledge. Additionally, he argues that ignorance of these socially embedded processes of knowledge construction contributes to the reproduction of conventional medical knowledge (Young 1978, 1980). Taking issue with the micro-level circumscription associated with the explanatory model approach, Frankenberg (1980) and Singer (1989) argue for the need to locate clinical events and encounters in the wider field of asymmetrical power relations. Drawing on dependency and world systems theories, critical medical anthropology analyzes social processes that bear upon the social distribution of sickness and access to health care in the context of asymmetrical relations, the role of the state, the commodification of health care, and the ideological nature of medical knowledge (e.g., Baer 1982; Singer 1986). Morgan (1987), however, argues that the application of dependency theory in the analysis of the political economy of health resulted in a capitalist-centered view of the world. This view is reflected in the attribution of the configurations of health and health care mainly to the determinative treatment.” [Kleinman 1978:87-88] 6 force of capitalism. Not only is the persistence of indigenous forms of healing in the midst of capitalism rarely explained but also the local initiative and the active role of subordinated social actors are ignored. Others (e. g., Comaroff 1982; Scheper-Hughes and Lock 1986, 1987; Taussig 1980; Young 1978, 1980) begin with the supposition that social life is fundamentally a negotiation of meanings. They reject the hegemony of positivist science by regarding Western scientific endeavors as arising from a historical and cultural milieu. Scheper-Hughes and Lock (1987:48) observe that this theoretical and methodological persuasion has shifted the focus of inquiry in medical anthropology from "alternative medical systems" to "the ways in which knowledge relating to the body, health, and illness is culturally constructed, negotiated, and renegotiated." The same authors suggest that a task for medical anthropology is to describe the variety of metaphorical conceptions (conscious and unconscious) about the body and associated narratives and then to show the social, political, and individual uses to which conceptions are applied in practice. [Scheper-Hughes and Lock 1987:49; italics added] In the same vein, Lindenbaum and Lock (1993:x) assert that the subject matter of medical anthropology is neither simply medicine as an institutional body of scientific knowledge nor the human body as an unproblematic product of nature, but rather the creation, representation, legitimization, and application of knowledge about the body in both health and illness. What is evident in these recent concerns in medical anthropology is the field’s active involvement in theorizing about the interrelationships among culture, power, human agency, and history. These are, of course, not isolated developments for they 7 resonate with theoretical musings about ”practice.” Acknowledging the immense contributions of Bourdieu (1977), de Certeu (1984), Sahlins (1976), Giddens (1979), and Williams (1977), Ortner (1989b: 199) characterizes practice theories as [t]heories of the production and transformation of the cultural order through a variety of forms of action and interaction.... In a practice analysis one examines the particular forms of human activity and human relationships prevalent in a society at a given moment, and attempts to see in them the sources of cultural reproduction and cultural change. [italics added] In effect, theories of practice emphasize the inseparability of structure and human agency, thus rejecting formulations that privilege structure over human agency or human agency over structure. As Ortner (1989b: 196) notes, Bourdieu’s notion of habitus refers to "a lived-in and in-lived structure”; Foucault’s idea of discourse designates "a symbolic order that is controlling yet manipulable"; and Williams’s concept of hegemony suggests ”a lived system of meaning and values-—constitutive and constituting. " This dissertation, thus, aims to contribute to the current discourse on the interconnectedness of culture, power, and history. It explores the ways in which power-laden cultural schemas and historical processes shape the struggles against malaria in the Philippines. Notes on Malaria Studies in the Philippines It should be noted, at the outset, that studies of malaria in the Philippines emphasize an epidemiological approach that leaves the sociocultural underpinnings of malaria relatively unexplored [see for example the bibliographies by Russell (1934), Walker (1953), and Rosal (1974)]. 8 Studies on the structure, organization, and management of the antimalarial program in the Philippines come from the field of public administration and, to date, two studies have been conducted. Doria (1964) examined the process of technical assistance surrounding malaria eradication in the Philippines. This study documented the relationship between the Philippine government and donor agencies evident in activities such as planning, organizing, staffing, directing, coordinating, recording, and budgeting. The study also described the donor-client relationship inherent in the program. Alfiler et al. (1990) examined the organization and management of disease control programs in the Philippines. Their discussion of malaria control focused on the shifts in administrative and management strategies in the antimalarial program. This study prescribed ways to overcome the organizational and administrative obstacles facing the program in the light of the tenets of public administration. It also provided useful information for the analysis of the role played by international donors in the decision-making process concerning the program. Unlike Doria’s study, this investigation alluded to the dominant role played by international health agencies in charting the course of the malaria control program in the Philippines. The studies by Lariosa (1986) and Abaya (1987) are case studies focusing on the social and cultural aspects of malaria and its control. Lariosa’s inquiry focused on knowledge, attitudes, and practice (KAP) concerning malaria and its control in Cabagan, Isabela. The study measured local knowledge about the epidemiology of malaria and concluded that local notions of malaria etiology, signs and symptoms, and treatment, in large measure, did not cohere with biomedical knowledge. The 9 investigation also measured the attitudes of the study population towards the health care delivery system and concluded that the study population held unfavorable attitudes, particularly in regard to the delivery of health services in the area. Conducted in the same locale, my inquiry focused on the ecological factors and ethnomedical knowledge and practices that account for the persistence of malaria. I characterized the people’s ”medical behavior" as pragmatic, as they used both "traditional” and "modern" healing practices to ameliorate malaria. Both studies were partly grounded on the modernity versus tradition paradigm. In my earlier work, however, I have alluded to the idea that global political and economic forces (e.g., international health agencies and pharmaceutical industries) influence the form and content of the local responses to malaria. In this present study, I am pursuing this point as it relates to the shifts in the orientation of the malaria program in the Philippines through time. The social and cultural dimensions of malaria and its control in the Philippines remain relatively unexplored. Research has been narrowly focused on either the communities affected by malaria or the state malaria control apparatus. The cultural politics surrounding the interactions between the state’s antimalarial program and the malaria-stricken communities has been left virtually unexamined. This study, thus, addresses these relationships. Chapter Two provides a description of the research strategies used to conduct this research. It also includes a discussion of the various representations of Masipi (the study site) as a social and physical setting. Chapter Three addresses the key features of the antimalarial program as they 10 unfolded through time. Attention is given to the history of malaria control in the Philippines. The discussion highlights the roots of the antimalarial campaign in US. colonial expansion, its grounding in biomedical knowledge and technology, the primacy it gives to top-down health planning and implementation, and its embeddedness in the economic and cultural dependency of the Philippines on foreign aid, notably from the United States. In Chapter Four, I examine the ways in which malaria assumes its configuration in the local discourse about the body-in-health and the body-in- suffering. I focus attention on the local precepts and practices concerning health, sickness, and healing. My purpose is to describe the ways in which malaria is configured in the experiential world of the Ilokanos. Chapter Five focuses attention on the structure and dynamics of the cultural politics of the antimalarial activities in Masipi. It demonstrates how certain features of the antimalarial campaign, such as its emphasis on medico-technological strategies for disease control and its top-down approach to health planning, invariably condition the cultural politics of the antimalarial interventions in the study area. The analysis also points to the processes of domination, conformity, and resistance created through the interactions among the state health functionaries, the state-supervised barangay 6 officials, and the local residents. These interactions reflect the power relations that shape the nature of negotiations among participants over the official definitions and strategies concerning malaria control writ large. These encounters illuminate the 6The term May is a designation for the smallest politico-geographic unit of the Philippine state. 11 ways in which the state, employing various strategies of persuasion, contends with community-based cultural constructions of malaria including the views of the local residents towards the antimalarial program. The final chapter underscores the historical and ethnographic grounding of the cultural politics of the struggles against malaria in the Philippines. It pays heed to the recent call in the field of medical anthropology for the linking of local to global processes, especially in regard to the politics of international health. It points out the processes responsible for the predicaments faced by the state and the Ilokanos in addressing the problem of malaria. In espousing a notion of power as productive and transformative, the discussion brings to light the limits of government authority in the face of locally situated cultural forms of apathy, ambivalence, and resistance. Chapter Two METHODS AND RESEARCH SETTING The first part of this chapter takes up the data gathering methods employed in this inquiry. The second part discusses the various representations of Masipi, the setting of the ethnographic investigation. D h ’ e ’ Historical Research I focused my historical research on the origin and development of the antimalarial program in the Philippines. Specifically, I paid attention to the goals that had guided the efforts to control malaria in the archipelago, efforts that began in the early 1920s under the US. colonial regime. Primary sources included reports and other writings by US. nationals who were directly involved in the colonial government, publications from the Philippine Bureau of Science, and documents such as memoranda, executive orders, and newsletters from the Philippine Department of Health and the Malaria Eradication Service (now the Malaria Control Service), and reports of the periodic external evaluations of the malaria program of the Philippines. Secondary sources included studies of the malaria program in the Philippines and works that characterized the nature of Philippine-US relationships from the colonial and postcolonial era. Library work was conducted in the both the Philippines and the 12 13 United States. In the Philippines, I used the library resources of WHO Western Pacific Region Office in Manila, the Philippine Department of Health in Manila, the University of the Philippines Library System in Quezon City, and the Thomas Jefferson Library in Makati. In the United States, I used the library resources of Michigan State University in East Lansing, Michigan, and the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, Michigan. Ethnographic Research I conducted fieldwork in Manila, in the provinces of Cagayan and Isabela in northeastern Luzon, and in the municipality of Cabagan, Isabela (see Figure 1) from November 1991 to April 1993. I collected data from health service professionals (e.g., medical doctors, nurses, midwives, microscopists, sanitary engineers, malaria workers, and pharmacists), who represented the state health care system, and the Ilokanos in Masipi, including Kleinman’s ”popular sector"--lay people--and the "folk sector”--local healers (Kleinman 1978:86). I carried out some of the research through interviews and observations in health offices, hospitals, and clinics (see Table 1). When permitted, I tape recorded the interviews and later transcribed them. Otherwise, I took notes in the process of interviewing and after leaving the setting. I spent considerable time with the Ilokanos of Masipi in Cabagan, Isabela. Masipi, the name of the settlement, means "in between” and characterizes the location on stretches of land between hills. Masipi’s total land area is 4,733 hectares, and the elevation ranges from 40 to 140 meters above sea level. Several small tributaries and intermittent creeks lead to the Masipi Creek, a tributary of the Pinacanauan River. l4 :wacaafi .858 mafia—Em .oocsocm 239% E smug—WU be baaegz. _ Bani e0 O=om Sauna-1.x .(xl .Ixe nGliSF T ......... _ ill. I: .lL... 35-0.. , O o a... .3qu 8.2..— m<> it. \\ 5mm: 952—5.... ./. hag-nu”: 3.1; new. ate—2 Scam 15 Table 1. Offices, hospitals, and clinics visited Central Office of the Department of Health in Sta. Cruz, Manila Regional Health Office (Region II) in Tuguegarao, Cagayan Provincial Health Office in Ilagan, Isabela Municipal Health Office in Cabagan, Isabela Milagros District Hospital in Cabagan, Isabela Rural Health Unit in Cabagan, Isabela 95".“.‘93‘91‘ Two barangays comprise Masipi, with a total population of some 3,000 individuals. Masipi West includes the settlements of Compra and Magallones while Masipi East includes the settlement of Sagpat. These settlements are separated by expanses of grasslands and agricultural lands, which are planted in rice, corn, tobacco, sugarcane, and legumes (see Figure 2). Figures 3, 4, and 5 reflect the physical features of the three settlements. Certain climatic and environmental features of the area, as well as aspects of the daily life in the village, tend to promote a condition conducive to the occurrence and transmission of malaria. There are abundant water sources (rivers, streams, and man- made irrigation canals), which are surrounded by thick foliage and undergrowth, making them suitable breeding places for mosquitoes. Most houses are made of bamboo and m (coarse grass) thatch and are elevated 3 to 5 feet above the ground on posts. This leaves no hindrance to mosquito-human contact. Moreover, as Figure 6 shows, outdoor economic activities take place when malaria transmission rates and mosquito density are high, at the onset and end of the rainy season. I6 Ea: :3... ”028m “an—mam 98 63:80 deco—Ema: 8.2% 5.380% .N 8:3..— vhomwy -\pf‘-\\. ‘- \\ I a"~wouuM'v\waM‘~\. y, 17 IAOALLNEC SETTLEMENT PROFILE Am“.lRIAI ..YIIO MAI. .m nous! E] CHAPEL EB NEAl YR C(NVER , a e‘ s‘ '4 IE] MIUI'ARV STATION ROAD WATER IOFFAlOES mm‘é‘ifiu Figure 3. Magallones 18 ’1 O" ‘ NT PROFLE CMRA m. use. 3.7m one can mus n! f. och-1;. warn mum '5 ii W’Q fr (2)” w SET .0) CS) ,0» “A F O ’0‘ 0‘. “a 3* sf? ,, Figure 4. Compra 19 .396 O :5. 5:; £1 1 :23 3:52.: 9 n8 835::- 5:3 1 3: ”has???” Sn: 3:. Ga 38:33-35 83G 23: illli 93¢ @ 29:; :25... H 8023 E 553153: e :25 U 330: 523:.- m. m m C. is. a... ¢1I:.l§ blo