IIHHHUJIHINUMHHINHIHIWHHIHHIHHHHHHHI (ONO) lllllllllllWllllllWlHlflllWllll(Ml/Ill”lllllllllllll 93 01046 8555 This is to certify that the thesis entitled Studies on Cold-Regulated Gene Expression in Rhizobium meliloti presented by Marcia Deane Lehmann has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirementS‘for M. S . degree in Microbiology I ajor professor Date NOV. 4, 1994 0-7639 MS U is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Institution LIBRARY Michigan State University v PLACE N RETURN BOX to remove this checkout from your record. TO AVOID FINES return on or bdore date due. DATE DUE DATE DUE DATE DUE ~ MSU Is An Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Institution Warts-oi STUDIES ON COLD-REGULATED GENE EXPRESSION IN IUILZOBUIHIJKELJIKITI BY Marcia Deane Lehmann A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Microbiology and Center for Microbial Ecology 1994 ABSTRACT STUDIES ON COLD-REGULATED GENE EXPRESSION IN RHIZOBIUM MELILOTI BY Marcia Deane Lehmann Rhizobium.meliloti strain 1021 (Rm 1021) was grown at various temperatures; growth rate decreased with a decrease in temperature. SDS—PAGE analysis of protein synthesis showed 8 up-regulated and 8 down-regulated proteins after a shift from 300C to 150C. Rm 1021 was mutagenized using Tn5-luxAB to identify cold-induced genes. Temperature shift from 300C to 100C revealed two mutants, Rm 5—5-6 and Rm 3—16-6, which exhibited an increase in light emission. Timing and degree of induction was characterized at various temperatures. Both Rm 5—5—6 and Rm 3—16—6 were induced by a shift from 300C to 200C or 150C, but not 250C. A shift to 100C resulted in delayed induction. Cloning and sequencing of genomic regions flanking the TnS—luxAB insertion in Rm 3—16—6 identified the cold—regulated gene as a 16S rRNA gene. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It is impossible to thank everyone who has helped me during my graduate work. This is, at best, an attempt to thank the major contributors. I would like to thank Pyung Ok Lim, who started the project. Frans de Bruijn, Sylvia Rossbach, and Maria Schneider answered questions concerning Rhizobium meliloti and protocols. Peter Wolk and members of his lab, especially Todd Black, Yuping Cai, and Jeff Elhai, answered my many questions about luxAB and the photonic camera. Mike and my labmates, Sarah Gilmour, Todd Black, Julia Bell, Nancy Artus, Dave Horvath, Brett McLarney, Kathy Wilhelm, Ann Gustafson, Eric Stockinger, Kevin O'Connell, Stokes Baker and Lenny Bloksberg, as well as Sue Hammar in the Grumet lab, have answered questions about almost everything else. As my major professor, Mike Thomashow kept me on track and pulled me through in the end. My committee members, Frans de Bruijn, Dennis Fulbright, and Wendy Champness, were helpful, tough, honest and fair. I also want to thank the Department of Microbiology and the Center for Microbial Ecology. And of course a big thanks to my family, my friends, and Bill. Thanks again, everyone. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Content Page List of tables V List of figures vi Chapter One Introduction 1 Bibliography 7 Chapter Two Studies (n1 Cold—Regulated Gene Expression le Rhizobium meliloti 10 Bibliography 50 iv LIST OF TABLES Table Page Chapter Two 1 Strains and plasmids used 16 2 Generation times of Rm 1021 in TY and GT8 media at various temperatures 21 3 Light emission at 300C and 100C in mutant carrying Tn5—luxAB insert 30 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page Chapter Two 1 Growth after shift of Rm 1021 from 300C to lower temperature 22 2 Arrhenius plot of Rm 1021 steady state growth rates at decreasing temperatures 23 3 1D gel analysis of Rm 1021 35S—labeled proteins at 300C and 150C 25 4 Map of the suicide vector, pRLlO62a 26 5 Stability of V. fischeri and V; harveyi luxAB 27 6 Light emission from cold—regulated mutants at 300C and 100C 29 7 Detection of Tn—luxAB insertions in Rm 5—5—6 and Rm 3-16-6 32 8 Induction of luxAB insertion in Rm 5—5-6 and Rm 3—16—6 upon shift from 300C to lower temperatures 33 9 Fold induction after shift from 300C to 370C 35 10 Sequence comparison between Tn5-luxAB insertion site in Rm 3-16-6 and R. meliloti l6S rRNA 36 ll Detection of 168 rRNA copies 37 12 Sequence identity between E. coli rrnB and Rm 3—16—6 rRNA operons 39 13 Steady state growth rates of Rm 1021 and Rm 3—16-6 at decreasing temperatures 41 Vi INTRODUCTION Prokaryotes experience Imnur environmental stresses, including extremes in temperature, pH, osmolarity, and nutrient—limitation. Bacteria are often able to adapt to harsh conditions and the mechanism can involve changes in gene expression. The general subject of this thesis regards microbial acclimation to low temperature. Cold shock response in Escherichia coli. E. coli exhibits an ability to rapidly adjust to shifts up or down in temperature between 370C and 200C. Cultures shifted within this range assume a new steady state growth rate almost immediately with reported periods of adjustment varying from zero to ten minutes (10, 15, 17). Total protein synthesis reaches its new rate almost immediately; however, synthesis rates of individual proteins exhibit a transient increase or decrease then reach a steady state synthesis rate after approximately 20 minutes (15). Temperature downshifts outside the 370C to 200C range require a much longer period of adjustment before resuming growth. For example, E.coli experiencing a shift from 370C to 100C generally exhibits a 4 hour lag before assuming the steady state growth rate for 100C (12). An earlier study 2 (17) reported a slightly more complex situation in which the 4 hour lag was followed by a period of rapid growth which gradually declined to the new steady state rate of growth. After a shift from 370C to 50C, the bacteria are unable to initiate protein synthesis and the culture no longer doubles (2, 4, 6). Cold shock proteins in E. coli. Overall, the rate of protein synthesis decreases when a culture is cold shocked, but some proteins are produced, at least transiently, at.ea higher level. These upregulated proteins are known as cold shock proteins (CSPs). CSPs were first identified by comparing the quantitative levels of proteins at different temperatures using 2—D gel electrophoresis (9). Thirteen CSPs were identified, 12 of which were found to be upregulated 2— to 10—fold (12). Nine of the 12 have been identified as polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNP), NusA, initiation factor 2a, initiation factor 23, RecA, dihydrolipoamide acetyltransferase, pyruvate dehydrogenase (lipoamide), H-NS, and DNA gyrase subunit A (11, 12, 13). Together these proteins have a wide range of activity, such as formation of acetyl CoA for the tricarboxylic acid cycle (dihydrolipoamide acetyltransferase and pyruvate dehydrogenase), recombination and induction of the SOS response (RecA), DNA supercoiling (GyrA), degradation of single stranded RNA (PNP) thermoregulation of transcriptbma of the pilin genes (H—NS), termination of transcription (NusA), and binding tRNAfmet to the 305 3 ribosomal subunit for initiation of translation (initiation factors a and B) (8, 11, 12, 13). CspA and CspA-like proteins. The major CSP in E. coli, CspA (CS7.4), is induced 100— fold in response to cold shock; it is undectable at 370C, but is the most abundantly synthesized protein at 100C (7, 11, 12). Within 30 minutes of temperature shift, CspA is detectable (7). CspA levels increase during the cold shock— induced lag period (11), then decrease to a level approximately 20% of the maximum level (7). No temperature has been determined as the threshold for induction. Fourteen degree temperature shifts from 420C to 280C, 370C to 230C, and 240C to 100C all resulted in the induction of CspA (10), but shifting from 240C to 100C resulted in the strongest induction. Shifting from 370C to 100C resulted in even higher levels of CspA than the shift from 240C to 100C (10). Together these results indicate that the level of induction is a factor of both the magnitude of the temperature shift and the final temperature itself. CspA appears to be a DNA-binding protein based on sequence identity to the human protein YB-l; YB—l binds to the CCAAT—containing "Y box" (5, 23). Binding of a Y box factor to the cis—acting Y box in a promoter has been shown to activate transcription (20). CspA has been shown to bind to the CCAAT sequence and hns, cspA, recA, nusA, pup, and gyrA contain at least one ATTGG sequence (11, 13). Thus, it 4 is possible that CspA is a transcriptional activator which is auto-regulated (11, 13, 19). Recently, three other genes have been identified in E. coli that encode proteins with 79, 70, and 45% amino acid identity to CspA (14). These proteins have been designated CspB, CspC, and CspD, respectively. Curiously, while CspB is induced by cold shock, CspC exhibits no response to cold and CspD is actually inhibited by cold shock (14). CspA-like proteins exist in other prokaryotes as well. For example, Bacillus subtilus contains 21 protein, CspB, which is induced by a cold shock (22). CspB protein demonstrates 61% amino acid identity to CspA, while the DNA sequences show 60% identity (22). CspB demonstrates 43% identity to the human Y—box factor binding site (22, 23). The Gram positive bacterium Streptomyces clavuligerus has a 7.0 kDa protein which is 56% identical and 80% similar to CspA (1). Cold shock proteins in Rhizobium spp. Three arctic strains of Rhizobium spp. were isolated from arctic legumes and compared to three temperate strains, (one being R. meliloti A2), in regard to their heat and cold shock responses (3). After a shift from 250C to -20C for arctic strains and 300C to —20C for temperate strains, 17—24 cold shock proteins were present in arctic strains, while temperate strains had 18—22 cold shock proteins. Quantification was not reported. An 11.1 kDa protein was found tx> be abundant after temperature downshifts, with 5 levels increasing with decreasing temperature, similar to CspA. Whether this protein is a CspA—like protein is not yet known. Regulation of the cold shock response in E. coli. The mechanism(s) responsible for regulating the cold shock response has yet to be defined. There is evidence, however, that the cold shock response may involve the action of (p)PpGpp. (p)ppGpp levels have been shown to decrease with a decrease in temperature (10, 16, 18). The fact that induction of the stringent response prior to temperature downshift resulted in the repression of CspA, NusA, RecA, PNP, dihydrolipoamide acetyltransferase and pyruvate dehydrogenase (10), suggests that (p)ppGpp may negatively regulate CspA, which in turn regulates the other ppGpp— repressed cold shock proteins. A mutant unable to synthesize detectable levels of ppGpp (relA spoT), had a much higher steady state level of CspA at 240C than the wild type (12). At 300C, however, CspA levels in the mutant did not differ from the wild type (21) . Thus, CspA is not regulated by (p)ppGpp alone. Ribosomes have been proposed to act as sensors of heat and cold shock based on the upregulation of heat shock or cold shock proteins after addition of antibiotics which target the ribosome (21). In particular, heat shock proteins were found to be induced by kanamycin, puromycin and streptomycin. Ten of the fourteen CSPs, including CspA, were induced by a second set of antibiotics which target the A 6 site of the ribosome, including chloramphenicol, erythromycin, fusidic acid, spiramycin, and tetracycline (21). Although (p)ppGpp and/or ribosomes may be involved in regulation of the cold shock response, the mechanism(s) remains to be elucidated. BIBLIOGRAPHY Sci. B IBLIOGRAPHY Ay-Gay, Y., Y. Aharonowitz, and G. Cohen. 1992. Streptomyces contain a 7.0 kDa cold shock like protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 20:5478. Broeze, R.L., C.J. Solomon, and D.H. Pope. 1978. Effects of low temperature on in vivo and in Vitro protein synthesis in Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas fluorescens. J. Bacteriol. 134:861—874. Cloutier, J., D. Prevost, P. Nadeau, and H. Antoun. 1992. Heat and cold shock protein synthesis in arctic and temperate strains of rhizobia. App. Env. Micro. 58:2846—2853. Das, H.K., and A. Goldstein. 1968. Limited capacity for protein synthesis at zero degrees centigrade in Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 31:209—226. Didier, D.K., J. Schiffenbauer, S.L. WOulfe, M. Zacheis, and B.D. Schwartz. 1988. Characterization of the cDNA encoding a protein binding to the major histocompatibility complex class II Y box. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 85:7322—7326. Friedman, M., P. Lu, and A. Rich. 1969. Ribosomal subunits produced by cold sensitive initiation of protein synthesis. Nature. 223:909—913. Goldstein, J., N.S. Pollitt, and M. Inouye. 1990. Major cold shock protein of EScherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. USA. 87:283—287. Goransson, M., B. Sonden, P. Nilsson, B. Dagberg, K. Forsman, K. Emanuelsson, and 8.3. Uhlin. Transcriptional silencing and thermoregulation of gene expression in Escherichia coli. Nature. 344:682—685. Herendeen, S.L., R. van Bogelen, and F.C. Neidhardt. 1979. Levels of major proteins of Escherichia coli during growth at different temperatures. J. Bacteriol. 139:185—194. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. l6. 17. 18. 19. 20. 8 Jpnes, P.G., M. Cashel, G. Glaser, and P.G. Meidhardt. 1992. Function of a relaxed—like state following temperature downshifts in EScherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 174:3903—3914. Jpnes, P.G., R. Krah, S.R. Tafuri, and A.P. WOlffe. 1992. DNA gyrase, CS7.4, and the cold shock response in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 174:5798-5802. Jones, P.G., R.A. Van Bogelen, and F.C. Neidhardt. 1987. Induction of proteins in response to low temperature in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 169:2092-2095. La Teana, A., A. Brandi, M. Falconi, R. Spurio, C.L. Pon, and C.O. Gualerzi. 1991. Identification of a cold shock transcriptional enhancer of the EScherichia coli gene encoding nucleoid protein H—NS. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 88:10907—10911. Lee, S.J., A. xie, W. Jiang, J.-P. Etchegaray, P.G. Jones, and M.Inouye. 1994. Family of the major cold—shock protein, CspA (CS7.4), of Escherichia coli, whose members show a high sequence similarity with the eukaryotic Y-box binding proteins. Mol. Micro. 11:833— 839. Lemaux, P.G., S.L. Herendeen, P.L. Bloch, and F.C. Neidhardt. 1978. Transient rates of synthesis of individual polypeptides in E. coli following temperature shifts. Cell. 13:427—434. Mackow, E.R., and F.N. Chang. 1983. Correlation between RNA synthesis and ppGpp content in Escherichia coli during temperature shifts. Mol. Gen. Genet. 192:5-9. Ng, H., J.L. Ingraham, and A.G. Marr. 1962. Damage and derepression in Escherichia coli resulting from.growth at low temperatures. J. Bacteriol. 84:331—339. Pao, C.C., and B.T. Dyess. 1981. Stringent control of RNA synthesis in the absence of guanosine 5'— diphosphate-3'-diphosphate. J. Biol. Chem. 256:2252—2257. Tanabe, H., J. Goldstein, M. Yang, and M. Inouye. 1992. Identification of the promoter region of the Escherichia coli major cold shock gene, CspA. J. Bacteriol. 174:3867—3873. Tafuri, S.R., and A.P. Wolffe. 1990 Xenopus Y—box transcription factors: molecular cloning, functional analysis, and developmental regulation. 1990. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 87:9028—9032. 21. 22. 23. 9 van Bogelen, R., and P.G. Meidhardt. 1990. Ribosomes as sensors of heat and cold shock in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 87:5589—5593. Willimsky, G., H. Bang, G. Fischer, and M.A. Marahiel. 1992. Characterization of cspB, a Bacillus subtilus inducible cold shock gene affecting cell viability at low temperatures. J. Bacteriol. 174:6326-6335. Wistow. G. 1990. Cold shock and DNA binding. Nature. 344:823—824. CHAPTER 2 Studies on cold-regulated gene expression in Rhizobium.meliloti lO ABSTRACT Rhizobium meliloti strain 1021 (Rm 1021) was grown at various temperatures to determine generation time. Growth rate was found to be a linear function of temperature between 15 and 300C. Above 300C and below 150C, however, growth was "restricted". Protein synthesis at 300C and 15°C was evaluated by SDS—PAGE. Analysis indicated that 8 proteins were up—regulated and another 8 down—regulated in response to a temperature downshift of 300C to 150C. To identify genes induced by low temperature, Rm 1021 was mutagenized using a Tn5-luxAB reporter transposon containing a kanamycin resistance gene for selection of mutants. The luxAB gene cassette encodes the light—producing luciferase enzyme of Vibrio harveyi. Mutants were shifted from 300C to 100C for six hours and screened for increased light emission. Two mutants, designated Rm 5—5—6 and Rm 3—16—6, exhibited 20— and 100-fold increase in light emission at low temperature and were selected for further study. The timing and degree of induction was characterized at various temperatures between 300C and 100C. Overall patterns of induction were the same; both Rm 5—5-6 and Rm 3—16—6 were induced by a shift from 300C to 200C or 150C, but not 250C. A shift to 100C resulted in 11 12 delayed induction. Cloning and sequencing of the genomic regions flanking the Tn5—luxAB insertion in Rm 3—16-6 identified the cold—regulated gene as a 16S rRNA gene. INTRODUCTION When E. coli experiences a change in temperature within a range in which growth is not restricted (370C to 200C), the culture immediately assumes the steady-state growth rate of the post—shift temperature (17). In contrast, cold shocks from 370C to 100C exibit a four hour lag before assuming the new growth rate, implying a change in cellular composition when growing outside the "normal" range (21, 22). At 50C, E. (fllLi is unable to initiate protein synthesis, ribosomal subunits accumulate, and cellular growth stops (5, 9, 14). The proteins involved in response to cold shock have been best characterized in E. coli. The major cold shock protein, CspA, demonstrates loo—fold induction after a thirteen degree temperature downshift. (15). CspA shows sequence identity to known transcriptional activators which bind to a CCAAT-containing "Y box" within a promoter (12, 38). CspA also has CCAAT binding activity (21). Thus, CspA may be a transcriptional activator. CspA-like proteins have been identified in Ikufillus subtilus and Streptomyces clavuligerus (2, 37). 2D gel analysis of the cold shock response has shown the presence of an additional twelve proteins that are induced some 2— to 10—fold in response to low temperature (15, 24). Ten of these proteins have been 13 14 identified (23, 24, 26), some of which are involved in either transcription or translation. Little is known about the cold shock response in Rhizobium spp. A study of three arctic and three temperate strains of Rhizobium spp. revealed the presence of 17—24 and 18-22 cold shock proteins, respectively (6). The identity of the genes and the mechanism for the regulation is unknown. The overall goals of my research project were to describe more fully R. meliloti growth at low temperature and to isolate, identify, and characterize the expression of one or more cold—regulated genes using R. meliloti strain 1021 (Rm 1021). The data indicate that the growth rate of Rm 1021 is a linear function of temperature between 15 and 300C, but that below 150C, growth is "restricted." The upregulation of 8 polypeptides, and downregulation of 8 polypeptides, was found to occur when Rm 1021 cells were shifted from 300C to 150C. 'Dmo genes that were cold-regulated were tagged by transposon mutagenesis and the patterns of induction were examined. Both Rm 3—16—6 and Rm 5—5—6 were induced by temperature shifts from 300C to 20, 15, or 100C, although induction at 100C was delayed. The identity of one was determined to be a 16S rRNA gene. This appears to be the first description of a cold—regulated rrn gene in bacteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS Bacteria and plasmids. Table I describes the bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study. Media and Culture Conditions. R. meliloti strains, (Rm 1021, Rm 3-16—6, Rm 5—5—6 and Rm C-30) were grown at 300C in either TY (4) medium adapted to 0.5 g/l CaC12—2H20, or GTS (25) medium, generally supplemented with 50 ug/ml streptomycin. E. coli strains were grown at 370C in LB medium (34). Strains containing plasmids were generally supplemented with 50 ug/ml kanamycin. (Tryptone and yeast extract were purchased from Difco, St. Louis, MO.) Tri-Parental Matings. Transposon :mutagenesis was accomplished via tri-parental matings, adapted from the method of De Bruijn and Rossbach (10). Rm 1021, E. coli containing pRL1062a and E. coli containing pRK2013 were grown to late log phase. 100 ul of each culture was placed in the center of a TY plate, allowed to dry, and incubated at 300C overnight. The resulting cell mass was scraped off with a loop and resuspended in 1 ml of TY medium and the dilutions plated on TY plates containing 200 ug/ml kanamycin and 250 ug/ml streptomycin. Plates were incubated at 300C for 3—4 days and screened for light emission. 15 16 Table 1 Strains and plasmids used. Strain or plasmid Description Sourc E. coli DHSa R. meliloti 1021 R. meliloti 3—16-6 R. meliloti 5—5—6 R. meliloti C—30 pRL1063a pRL1062a pRK2013 pAGla supE44 AlacUl69 ($801acZAM15) hst17 recAl endAl gyrA96thi—1 relAl SmR, Mos”, Moc‘ derivative of SU47 Rm 1021 mutagenized with pRL1062a Rm 1021 mutagenized with pRL1062a Rm 1021 mutagenized with pRL1062a Suicide vector carrying Tn5 with promoterless luxAB from Vibrio fischeri Suicide vector carrying Tn5 with promoterless luxAB from Vibrio harveyi ColEl KmR tra(RK2) Tn5—luxAB and flanking DNA from Rm 3-16-6 (Apa I digest) e or reference 34 29 This study This study This study 40 C.P. Wolk 13 A.M. Gustafson 17 Screening of Mutants. Mutants obtained by triparental mating were screened for light emission at 300C and 100C. After exposure to n-decanal for two minutes, light emission was quantitated for one minute with a Hamamatsu photonic camera (model c1966—20, Photonic microscopy, Oak Brook, IL). Light emission was measured at 300C, the aldehyde allowed to dissipate in a sterile environment, and the plates incubated at 100C for 6 hours before being screened again. Mutants that emitted light at 100C, but not 300C, were picked and rescreened using the same method. Stability of V; fischeri and V; harveyi luxAijroteins. 2 ul of overnight cultures were pipetted onto filter squares on TY plates. Plates were incubated at 300C overnight and filters were transferred to fresh plates and incubated at 100C for 6 hours. Filters were then transferred to fresh plates at room temperature for O, 15, 30, and 45 minutes. The plates were exposed to aldehyde for 2 minutes then screened for light emission for 1 minute using a Hamamatsu photonic camera. Genomic DNA Analysis. Total DNA from Rm 1021, Rm 5-5—6 and Rm 3-16—6 was isolated by a method adapted from Rossbach (32). One and a half ml of an overnight culture was centrifuged for 3 min. The pellet was washed with 1 volume 1M NaCl, 25mM potassium phosphate and centrifuged 3 minutes. The pellet was resuspended in 350 ul TE, 25 ul 20% SDS, 25 ul pronase (10 mg/ml) and 100 ul sterile distilled H20. After incubating for 1 hour at 370C, the DNA was passed three times 18 through a sterile syringe with an 18 gauge needle. DNA was purified by 2 phenol extractions with a ten minute centrifugation, followed by 2 phenol/chloroform extractions with five minute centrifugations and 1 chloroform extraction followed by a 2 minute centrifugation. Two volumes of 100% ethanol were added and mixed by careful shaking. The DNA was spooled out with a pasteur pipette and dissolved overnight in 100 ul sterile distilled water. Kpn I and Sma I (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) were used separately to digest Rm 1021, Rm 5—5-6 and Rm 3—16—6. Digests were incubated according to manufacturer's specifications. DNA fragments were separated on a 0.7% agarose gel. DNA was transferred to a nylon filter (nytran) using a posiblotter (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). Hybridization was accomplished using 32P—radiolabeled luxAB fragments from pRL1062 or the 5' 16S DNA flanking genomic fragment from pAGla as a probe for quantitating to number of Tn5-luxAB insertions or confirming the 16S copy number, respectively. Protein synthesis. Rm 1021 was grown at 300C to an OD500 of ~0.3. Before shifting to 150C, 1 ml of culture was added to a disposable 15 ml culture tube and labeled with 353 methionine (5 ul/ml) for 10 minutes at 300C. 500 ul of 10 mg/ml l—methionine was added to stop labeling. Cells were centrifuged for 15 minutes, washed with 1 ml of 25 mM Tris/ 1 M NaCl, centrifuged for 5 minutes and resuspended in 100 ul 25 mM Tris/10 mM MgClg, 5 ul 6 mg/ml lysozyme, 5 ul 1 mg/ml l9 DNase I. Cells were incubated at 300C for 30 minutes, 110 ul of a cracking buffer containing 100 mM NaOH, 1% SDS and 10 mM EDTA was added, cells were boiled for 2 minutes then centrifuged for 30 minutes. To precipitate proteins, 1.3 ml of acetone was added to the supernatant, placed at —200C for 2 hours then centrifuged for 30 minutes. The resulting pellet was resuspended in SDS sample buffer. After the remaining culture was incubated at 150C for one hour, 1 ml was removed, labeled with 358 methionine for 30 minutes at 150C and labeled proteins were purified as above. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE (27). Induction in TY medium. Idght emission was measured using a Berthold luminometer (Lumat LB9501, Wallac Inc., Gaithersburg, MD). 0.1% n—decyl aldehyde (D—7384, Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was buffered with 2% BSA (initial fractionation by heat shock, 98—99%, A3803, Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and 50 ul was added to 5 ul of culture. Light emission was measured in triplicate and the values for each set were averaged and adjusted for background and O.D. Fold induction was defined as light emission at low temperature divided by light emission at 300C. Growth rates. Culture growth rates were determined for wild type and mutant strains Rm 3—16-6 and Rm C—30 in triplicate. Twenty—four hour old cultures grown at 300C were diluted into fresh medium to give a final O.D.6oo of 0.1 before incubation at lower temperatures. Growth rates were established by measurement of increased O.D. over time. RESULTS Growth rates of Rm 1021 at low temperatures. Steady state growth rates at various temperatures were determined for the R. meliloti wild type, Rm 1021, in TY and GT8 media (Table 2). As expected, growth rate decreased with a decrease in temperature. Interestingly, when compared to growth in TY medium, Rm 1021 in GT8 medium exhibited a slower growth rate at 300C, but a faster growth rate at 100C. Growth lags were not observed upon shift of Rm 1021 cultures from 300C to 100C, or any of the higher temperatures tested in either TY (Figure 1) or GTS media (not shown). An Arrhenius plot is often used to show the relationship between the specific growth rate constant (k) and temperature (19). Prokaryotes typically have a "normal" range in which the growth rate decreases linearly with a decrease in temperature. Growth outside this range is "restricted" (17, 19). An Arrhenius plot of Rm 1021 from 370C to 100C indicated a linear relationship between 300C and 150C with a calculated temperature characteristic (u) of about 102,800 J/mol (~24,600 cal/mol) (Figure 2). Outside of the 30 to 150C range, growth became restricted; i.e., the k value fell 20 21 Table 2. Generation times of Rm 1021 in TY and GT8 media at various temperatures. Temperature TY medium GTS medium 370C 2.0 hr i 0.7 hr 300C 2.4 hr i 0.1 hr 3.6 hr 1 0.6 hr 250C 5.5 hr i 0.6 hr 200C 9.5 hr 1 0.7 hr 8.0 hr i 0.4 hr 150C 21.5 hr i 0.9 hr 100C 80.3 hr i 10.5 hr 32.3 hr i 2.4 hr Flasks of media were inoculated with overnight cultures of Rm 1021 to an O.D.600 of ~ 0.1. In each case, three replicate cultures were used. Generation times were calculated from growth rate during exponential phase. 22 1 I I I I I r I I r r I I T j . 25o+ . - 200 . g 150 - ‘° 1oc - =2 0 1 1 n I n l l 1 u l l 1 l L j —6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 HOURS Figure 1. Growth after shift of Rm 1021 from 30°C to lower temperature. Overnight cultures of Rm 1021 grown in TY medium at 300C were diluted into fresh TY medium to an O.D.5oo of ~0.1 and incubated at 30°C until the cultures reached an optical density of ~0.3. The cultures were transferred to either 25, 20, 15, or 100C and O.D.5oo measurements were taken at the indicated times. Plus, 300C. Diamond, 250C. Circle, 200C. Triangle, 150C. Square, 100C. 23 10 ’ ' I I ' I r a e a z .. < 1 E! 1 1 to q 2: i C> I L) 4 :1 E: .01 a O : m 1 w I 001 . I .4 l . 1 . 112 33 3A 35 36 1000/ ABSOLUTE TEMPERATURE Figure 2. Arrhenius plot of Rm 1021 steady state growth rates at decreasing temperatures. Steady state growth rates at each temperature were measured and used to calculate the growth rate constant, k (h’l), which is the inverse of the generation time. Each data point is labeled with the growth temperature, in Celsius. Dashed line indicates the expected growth rate constant if growth was not restricted. 24 below that predicted by extrapolation from the linear region of the Arrhenius plot. Protein synthesis. Changes in gene expression were found to occur in Rm 1021 upon ea shift from 300C t1) 150C (Figure 3). In particular, the synthesis of at least 8 rmflypeptides was upregulated in response to the temperature shift and the synthesis of at least another 8 proteins was downregulated by temperature downshift. Comparison of V; fisheri luxAB and V3 harveyi luxAB as reporter genes to "tag" cold-regulated genes. Rm 1021 was mutagenized with Tn5 derivatives carrying luxAB genes from either V. fischeri or V. harveyi (Figure 4) (39). Mutants were screened at 300C and 100C and any that appeared to be upregulated in response to low temperature were isolated and rescreened. Initially Rm1021 was mutagenized using luxAB from VA fischeri. Unexpectedly, the majority of the mutants demonstrated a dramatic increase in light emission upon shift from 300C to 100C. Five such isolates are shown in Figure 5 (spots 1-5); light emission of cells grown at 300C (panel B) was much less than that of cells incubated at 100C for 15 minutes (panel C). This result, however, was in apparent conflict with the protein synthesis study indicating only modest changes in gene expression in response to low temperature (Figure 3). Thus, it was suspected that the increase in light emission might be due to an increase in 25 Rm 1021 30°C 15°C Figure 3. 1D gel analysis of Rm 1021 358-1abe1ed proteins at 30°C and 15°C. An Rm 1021 culture was grown in TY medium at 30°C. At an O.D.5oo of ~0.3, half the culture was 35S— labeled at 30°C. The other half was transferred to 15°C for 2 hours, then 35S-labeled. 35S-labeled proteins were extracted from the cells and run on a polyacrylamide gel. Exposure of the 15°C lanes was increased to allow comparison of overall protein expression. Long arrows indicate upregulated proteins. Short arrows indicate downregulated proteins. 26 pRL1062a Smol Figure 4. Map of the suicide vector, pRL1062a. pRL1062a carries the luxAB genes from V. harveyi. pRL1063a (not shown), which carries luxAB from V. fischeri, varies only in the luxAB region. Enzyme sites of interest are indicated. 27 Figure 5. Stability of V. fischeri and V. harveyi luxAB. Mutants containing luxAB from V. fischeri or V. harveyi were compared to determine the relative stability of luxAB. (A) 1, 2, and 3 are V. fischeri mutants with putative constitutive expression; 4 and 5 are V; fischeri mutants which were apparently induced by a shift to 10°C; 6 and 7 are V; harveyi mutants which demonstrated no change in light emission upon temperature shift. Plates were incubated overnight at 30°C (B), shifted to 10°C, then placed at room temperature for 0 min (C), 15 min (D), 30 min (E), or 45 min (F). 28 LuxAB protein stability at low temperature as opposed to cold—induced expression of the genes. The V. harveyi LuxAB protein is known to be considerably more stable than the V. fischeri LuxAB protein (30). Indeed, the half life of the V. fischeri protein in Rm 1021 at 30°C must be less than 3 minutes as the light emission decreased more than 10 fold within 15 minutes of returning cold—treated cells to 30°C (Figure 5d). If jprotein. instability' accounted. for tflna results obtained with the V. fischeri luxAB transposon, then it was possible that the transposon carrying the luxAB gene from V. harveyi might alleviate the problem. Indeed, when the V. harveyi luxAB transposon was used, most of the inserts gave constitutive light emission at 30°C and 15°C. An example of such a mutant is shown in Figure 5 (spot 6). Transposon tagging of cold-regulated genes. The Tn5 derivative carrying the luxAB from V; harveyi was used for transposon mutagenesis. Mutants were grown at 30°C, then transferred t1) 10°C for 5 tx>'7 hours. The screening of approximately 17,000 mutants resulted in the isolation of two mutants, designated Rm 5-5—6 and Rm 3—16—6, carrying a transposon insert that displayed cold regulation (Figure 6). Rm 3—16—6 and Rm 5—5—6 exhibited an approximate 100- and 20-fold induction, respectively, upon a temperature shift from 30°C to 10°C for 6 hours (Table 3). Rm C—30 was selected as a control due to its constitutive expression. Approximately 4,500 mutants were shifted from 30°C to 15°C 29 30°C 10°C Rm 5—5—6 30°C 10°C Rm 3-16-6 Figure 6. Light emission from cold-regulated mutants at 30°C and 10°C. Overnight cultures of Rm 5—5—6 (A) and Rm 3—16—6 (B) were spotted in replicate onto TY plates and incubated overnight. The following day plates were split in half with one half placed at 10°C and the other half returned to 30°C. After 6 hours the halves were placed together, exposed to n— decanal and screened for light emission. 30 Table 3. Light emission at 30°C and 10°C in mutant carrying Tn5-luxAB insert. Mutant Average Light Emitted Fold (relative counts) Increase 300c 100c at 10°C Rm 3-16-6 245 i 74 (4) 29620 i 9525 (4) ~ 120 Rm 5-5—6 265 i 75 (4) 5340 i 145 (4) ~ 20 Rm C—30 1640 i 265 (2) 1880 i 190 (2) ~ 1 Overnight cultures were spotted in replicate onto TY plates and incubated overnight at 30°C. Plates were split, one half was placed at 10°C, the other half placed at 30°C, then placed together after 6 hours and exposed to n-decanal. Relative light emission was measured from each culture spot. Reported relative light emission from Rm 5—5—6 and Rm 3—16-6 is the average from four replicate spots; relative light emission reported for Rm C-30 is the average of two replicate spots. 31 for 24 hours but screening did not yield any additional cold— regulated mutants. number of Tn5—luxAB inserts. Southern analysis was used to determine the number of Tn5—luxAB insertions into the chromosome in Rm 5—5-6 and Rm 3—16—6. DNA from the mutants and wild type, Rm 1021, was digested with either Kpn I, which has no sites within the transposon, or Sma I, which cuts twice within the transposon (see Figure 4). After separation of the DNA fragments by agarose gel electrophoresis and transfer to nitrocellulose, a 32P—labeled Xba I fragment containing luxAB from pRL1062a (see Figure 4) was used to probe for the Tn5—luxAB insertion(s). As expected for a single insert, the probe hybridized to only one band in each of the digests for each mutant, (Figure 7). No hybridization was detected with the wild type strain, Rm 1021. Low temperature induction in TY medium. Rm 3—16—6, Rm 5—5—6, and Rm C—30 were grown in TY liquid culture to further examine the level of low temperature induction. Light emission upon shifts from 30°C to various lower temperatures was measured (Figure 8). Little to no induction was evident after a shift to 25°C. Both Rm 3—16—6 and Rm 5—5-5 were induced by a shift to 20°C, 15°C or 10°C, but the level of induction at 20°C and 15°C was much greater over the time course of the experiment than at 10°C. 32 Rm 1021 Rm 5-5-6 Rm 3-16-6 Kpn I Sma I Kpn I Sma I Kpn I Sma I Figure 7. Detection of Tn-luxAB insertions in Rm 5-5-6 and Rm 3-16-6. DNA from Rm 1021, Rm 5—5—6, and Rm 3—16—6 was digested with Kpn I or Sma I and separated on an agarose gel. DNA was transferred to nitrocellulose and probed with 32P— labeled luxAB from pRL1062a. FOLD INDUCTION FOLD INDUCTION 33 50 ..... . ..... ....r A 25 c z 40- - 9 - - [-1 30- - B - c: 20- - E 10- - 5 remu- a 0 III II 0 5 10 15 1 15 HOURS AT 25 C HOURS AT 20 C 50 ..... ,..r g D I 10 C H 40 - H . 8 30- - o . . E 20- - S 10.' ' 2 1.5.44 1 . ....1.... _ O 5 10 15 0 5 10 15 HOURS AT 15 c HOURS AT 10 C Figure 8. Induction of luxAB insertion in Rm 5—5—6 and Rm 3- 16-6 upon shift from 30°C to lower temperatures. TY medium was inoculated from overnight cultures grown at 30°C to an O.D.600 of ~0.1, incubated at 30°C until an O.D.5oo of ~0.3 was reached, then shifted to 25°C, 20°C, 15°C, or 10°C. Relative light emission was measured and adjusted for optical density. Results are the average from one experiment run in triplicate. (A) 25°C. (B) 20°C. (C) 15°C. (D) 10°C. Squares, Rm C—30. Triangles, Rm 3—16—6. Circles, Rm 5—5—6. 34 Expression in response to heat shock. To determine if Rm 3—16—6 was also responsive to a temperature upshift, light emission after heat shock was examined. Rm 3—16—6 and Rm C—30 were grown at 30°C in TY medium to an optical density (O.D.) of ~0.3 then shifted to 37°C. When light emission was measured at 37°C, then adjusted for O.D., a decrease in light emission was seen (Figure 9). Identification of cold-regulated gene. The gene into which the Tn5—luxAB inserted in Rm 3—16-6 was identified by cloning and sequencing. Total DNA from Rm 3—16—6 was digested with restriction enzymes that have no sites in the transposon. The fragments were recircularized using T4 ligase and the molecules were transformed into E. coli. An Apa I digest yielded a 9 Kb clone, designated pAGla, which was used for sequencing the R. meliloti genomic DNA flanking the transposon. A BLAST search of Genbank (1) indicated that the cloned gene had 99% sequence identity to R. meliloti 16S rRNA (accession number D12783) (Figure 10). Southern blots used to quantitate the number of Tn5— luxAB insertions (see Figure 7) were used to determine the number of 16S rRNA genes present in Rm 1021. The luxAB probe was removed from the blot and the blot was re—probed with 32P—labeled fragment of genomic DNA flanking the transposon in pAGla. Three bands were revealed in the Sma I digest of Rm 1021 (Figure 11) which is consistent with the conclusions of Honeycutt, et al. that R. meliloti has three rrn operons 35 lA-' j L) ' . 53 12 f j 9‘ . ‘< . z I O _ i-i E—t 1 U n D u a 1 z u u cl a q A q o - I“ I 00 i l L’ I ‘ 0 1 2 3 HOURSAT37C Figure 9. Fold induction after shift from 30°C to 37°C. Rm 3-16-6 and Rm C—30 overnight cultures grown at 30°C were used to inoculate TY medium to an O.D.6oo of ~0.1. After incubation at 30°C until an O.D.6oo of ~0.3 was reached, cultures were shifted to 37°C. Light emission was measured at 0, 0.5, 1, and 2 hours and adjusted for optical density. Adjusted light emission at 37°C was divided by adjusted light emission at 30°C to give relative light emission. Results shown are the average of three replicates in one experiment. Squares, Rm C-30. Circles, Rm.3—16-6. 36 V H GGGCCGCACAAGCGGTGGAGCATGTGGTTTAATTCGAAGCAACGCGCAGAACCTTA 56 l|illl||||||||Il||||||||||||lll||l||ll||||||||||||||l||| B: 842 GGCCCGCACAAGCGGTGGAGCATGTGGTTTAATTCGAAGCAACGCGCAGAACCTTA 897 A: 57 CCAGCCCTTGACATCCCGATCGCGGATACGAGAGATCGTATCCTTCAGTTCGGCTG 112 ll|llllllillllllll|IIIIl||||||||||||l||lllllllllllllllll B: 898 CCAGCCCTTGACATCCCGATCGCGGATACGAGAGATCGTATCCTTCAGTTCGGCTG 9S3 * A: 113 GATCGGAGACAGGTGCTGCATGGCTGTCGTCAGCTCGTGTCGTGAGATGTTGGGTT 168 illlllllll|||l||||||||||l|lll|i||||||||l||||||||||||l||| B: 954 GATCGGAGACAGGTGCTGCATGGCTGTCGTCAGCTCGTGTCGTGAGATGTTGGGTT 1009 A: 169 AAGTCCCGCAACGAGCGCAACCCTCGCCCTTAGTTGCCAGCATTCAGTTGGGCACT 224 |l||l||l|||l||||lllllllllllllll|li|||||||l||||||l|||l||| B: 1010 AAGTCCCGCAACGAGCGCAACCCTCGCCCTTAGTTGCCAGCATTCAGTTGGGCACT 1065 A: 225 CTAAGGGGACTGCCGGTGATAAGCCGAGAGGAAGGTGGGGATGACGTCAAGTCCTC 280 l|||||||||||||l||||Ill|||||||||||||||||llIllllllllllllll B: 1066 CTA “CCFCACTCCPCGTGATAAGPP ‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ Am"TGGGGA‘I‘GACGTCAAGTCC’I‘C 1121 A: 281 ATGGCCCTTACGGGCTGGGCTACACACGTGCTACA TGGTGGTGACAGTGGGCAGC 335 Ill||||||i|||||l|l|||||||||||||||l| llllllllllllllllllll B: 1122 ATGGCCCTTACGGGCTGGGCTACACACGTGCTACAATGGTGGTGACAGTGGGCAGC 1177 A: 336 GAGACCGCGAGGTCGACTGAATCTCCAAAAGCCATCTCAGTTCGGATTGCACTCTG 391 Illillllllilllll |||||||l|||||l|l||||l|||||||i|||||l|| B: 1178 GAGACCGCGAGGTCGAGCTAATCTCCAAAAGCCATCTCAGTTCGGATTGCACTCTG 1233 A: 392 CAACTCGAGTGCATGAAGTTGGAATCGCTAGTAATCGCAGATCAGCATGCTGCG 447 llllllllll |l|||||||ll|llllllllllllll|l|||||||||||l||| B: 1234 CAACTCGAGTNCATGAAGTTGGAATCGCTAGTAATCGCAGATCAGCATGCTGCG 1287 Figure 10. Sequence comparison between Tn5-luxAB insertion site in Rm 3-16—6 and R. meliloti 16$ rRNA. Regions flanking the Tn-luxAB insertion in Rm 3—16—6 were sequenced. A BLAST search (1) revealed 99% identity to R. meliloti 16S rRNA. Line A indicates sequence from pAGla. Line B indicates sequence from R. meliloti 16S rRNA (accession number D12783). Asterick indicates site of Tn—luxAB insertion. 37 Rm 1021 Rm 3-16-6 Kpn I Sma I Kpn I Sma I Figure 11. Detection of 16S rRNA copies. DNA from Rm 1021 and Rm 3—16—6 was digested with either Kpn I or Sma I and fragments were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis. DNA fragments were transferred to nitrocellulose and probed with 32P-labeled genomic DNA from pAGla. Astericks indicate bands which hybridized to the luxAB probe (see Figure 7). One of the three 16S rRNA fragments present in Rm 1021 was shifted in Rm 3—16—6, due to the Tn5—luxAB insertion. 38 (18). One of the three 16S rRNA fragments present in Rm 1021 was shifted in Rm 3—16—6, due to the Tn5—luxAB insertion. rRNA operon structure in Rm 1021. There have been no reports on the structure of rRNA operons in R. meliloti. It was therefore of interest to determine whether the 16S gene in Rm 1021 was followed by tRNA, 23S and SS genes as is found in the rRNA operons of E. coli and other prokaryotes such as Bacillus subtilus and Halobacterium thermophilus (for review, see ref. 35). Cla I, which has a restriction site within luxAB (Figure 4), was used tr) clone a fragment containing 9 Kb (of sequence downstream of Tn5—luxAB. This clone was then subcloned and sections of it were sequenced. Comparison of DNA sequence (11) indicated that the Rm 1021 16S rRNA gene was upstream of a 23S rRNA gene, separated by approximately 1.2 Kb of spacer region containing an alanine tRNA gene (Figure 12) (41). Sequence obtained from regions further downstream did not conclusively demonstrate whether there was or was not a SS rRNA gene. Comparison of growth rates. Rm 3—16—6 growth rates were compared to Rm 1021 to determine whether the presumed change in the number of functional rRNA operons affected the growth rate at either high or low temperature. Since Rm 3—16—6 contained a Tn5- luxAB insertion into a cold—regulated gene, it was possible that growth at lower temperatures might have been compromised. No significant difference in growth rate was 39 E. coli rrnB glu P1P2 16S _ tRNA 233 SS T1T2 JJitfrr' ' h thi ala l6S tRNA 23S 23S Rm 3—16—6 t1 Figure 12. Sequence identity between E. coli rrnB and Rm 3- 16-6 rRNA operons. Rm 3-16—6 fragments were cloned, subcloned and sequenced 5' and 3' of the Tn—luxAB insertion site. The resulting sequences were compared to E. coli rrnB by GenBank searches and manual searches. Rm 3—16—6 boxed regions indicate identity to E. coli rrnB. 4O seen between Rm 1021 and Rm 3—16—6 at 30°C, 25°C, 20°C, or 10°C when grown in TY medium (Figure 13). However, repetition of the experiment demonstrated a reproducible, albeit slight, difference in growth rates at 15°C. 41 1 . . ,. ., .. A 1 B E .3. g: '1 '= :51 s o : d I .01 1 l l l 1 I .01 nnnnn n 0 4 6 8 10 5 10 15 hours at 30 C hours at 25 C 1' l ' I 1 ' ' I I I D c O \C a q-1 g "a O l n l l I .01 L ' 0 10 20 30 20 4O 60 80 hours at 20 C hours at 15 C 1 - I I I I I E O.D. 600 l . I . l I l . l 01 . . 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 hours at 10 C Figure 13. Steady state growth rates of Rm 1021 and Rm 3-16- 6 at decreasing temperatures. Rm 1021 and Rm 3—16—6 cultures grown at 30°C were used to inoculate TY medium to an O.D.6oo of ~0.1. Growth rate was determined during exponential growth. Results shown are the average from triplicate cultures in one experiment. (A), 30°C. (B), 25°C. (C), 20°C. (D), 15°C. (E), 10°C. Squares, Rm 1021. Circles, Rm 3—16—6 . DISCUSSION Temperate strains of R. meliloti, such as Ihn 1021, exhibit optimal growth between 28°C and 30°C. In the northern regions of the U.S., however, soil bacteria are exposed to temperature ranges from 10 to —5°C nearly half the year. How bacteria survive and adapt to low temperatures is largely unknown. To address this question, several aspects of response to low temperature were examined in Rm 1021 and two mutants containing Tn5—luxAB inserts in cold—regulated genes. Growth in Rm 1021 between 15°C and 30°C is a linear function (Figure 2). At temperatures lower than 15°C or higher than 30°C, growth is restricted. In E. coli, an Arrhenius plot shows a linear relationship between 37°C and 21°C (17). The molecular basis for restricted growth at low temperature is not well understood. It is known that E. coli can not initiate protein synthesis after a shift from 37°C to 5°C (5, 9, 14). However, it is unknown whether problems in translation are responsible for restricted growth at higher temperatures. As has been shown with other organisms, R. meliloti alters gene expression in response to low temperature. Previous reports have shown the presence 18—22 cold shock 42 43 proteins 111 Rhizobiunl meliloti A2 and other temperate rhizobia (6). Similarly, our SDS—PAGE analysis indicated 8 proteins are upregulated by a shift to a lower temperature (Figure 3). Additionally, certain proteins were downregulated. The upregulation of only eight proteins on first consideration seems like a small number but only the most abundant proteins are visible by SDS—PAGE analysis. The total number' of upregulated proteins in R. meliloti, therefore, may be much higher. Presumably the changes in gene expression that occur in R. meliloti in response to low temperature are involved in cold acclimation. The identity and functions of cold— regulated genes in Rhizobia, and their relationship to cold— regulated genes in E. coli are unknown. Towards an understanding of the roles of R. meliloti cold—regulated genes in low temperature growth and survival, we used the Tn— luxAB transposon from V; harveyi to tag cold—regulated genes. In screening > 17,000 colonies, two mutants with insertions into cold—regulated genes were obtained. Although Rm 5—5—6 was not induced as strongly as Rm 3— 16—6, the overall induction patterns are similar. Both Rm 3— 16—6 and Rm 5—5—6 were induced by a shift from 30°C to 20, 15, or 10°C, but not 25°C. Interestingly, induction after a shift to 10°C was weak and delayed compared to induction after a shift to 20 or 15°C. The delay may be related to restricted growth at 10°C (Figure 2). 44 The cold—regulated gene tagged in Rm 3-16—6 was identified as a 16S rRNA gene (Figure 10). This result is somewhat surprising. Indeed, upregulation of an rRNA promoter at low temperature seems counter—intuitive since the promoter of rrn genes are subject to growth rate control. In nutritional growth rate control, rRNA promoter activity decreases with a decrease in growth rate (16). In our studies, however, fusion of the promoter region to luxAB showed increased promoter activity with a decrease in growth (data not shown). Although promoter activity was not directly measured, a previous study demonstrated a lack of correlation between stable rRNA and temperature—controlled growth rate (33). Currently, two models for growth rate control of rrn gene promoters exist. One is the ppGpp—dependent RNA polymerase partitioning model in which 670—RNA polymerase has two forms. rrn promoter strength depends on the ratio of form I, which maintains full activity, to form II, which has greatly decreased activity due to ppGpp (3). The feedback regulation model states that an excess in ribosomes increases translation which is then responsible for feedback control (7, 16, 20, 36). Control is believed to be at both the level of rrn transcript initiation and the elongation rate of RNA polymerase (7, 8). The partitioning model requires ppGpp to regulate synthesis. The feedback regulation model does not necessarily involve ppGpp, but proponents of the feedback regulation model agree that ppGpp may be the signal molecule 45 produced by excess translation (31). After temperature downshift, ppGpp levels decrease and RNA synthesis increases, suggesting ppGpp may be responsible, to some degree, for control of rRNA synthesis after cold shock (28). Overall, comparison of growth rates revealed little difference between Rm 1021 and Rm 3—16-6 despite the interruption of an rRNA operon in Rm 3—16-6 (Figure 13). This is not surprising since previous studies in E. coli have shown that the addition or deletion of rRNA operons does not change the number of ribosomes present (7, 8, 20). Rm 3—16— 6, with 67% functional operons, is comparable to an E. coli strain which has 5 out of 7, or 71%, functional operons. This E. coli strain demonstrated little to no change in growth rates after deletion of two of its rRNA operons (8). Interestingly, we did see a slight difference between Rm 1021 and Rm 3—16—6 growth rates at 15°C. The difference does not appear to be due to the effects of the reporter gene, since we see induction at 20°C without a difference in growth rate. At this time, the significant of this observation is unknown. There is a discrepancy in our reported light emission from Rm 3—16—6 and Rm 5—5—6 between solid and liquid media after 6 hours at 10°C (Figure 6 vs. Figure 8). Initially mutants were screened for changes in light emission after a temperature downshift while growing on solid medium. When light emission was measured from mutants growing in liquid medium, the measured fold induction was dramatically reduced 46 for both Rm 3—16—6 and Rm 5—5—6. This reduction may be due to physiological differences between bacteria growing in liquid or on solid medium. In addition, the assay conditions vary between cells grown in liquid and on solid medium. For example, aldehyde is delivered as a vapor to colonies on plates but liquid culture samples are vortexed with a solution of aldehyde dissolved in 2% BSA. Although the BSA acts as a stabilizer, the aldehyde is not easily suspended in water, thus the amount of aldehyde immediately available to the cell may be limited. Attempts to simulate solid medium conditions, either by using agar plugs or liquid culture spotted onto filter paper, did not result in a higher fold induction (not shown). It is possible that either of these methods may have interfered with light detection. Given the fact that 1D gel analysis indicated eight cold-regulated proteins, isolation of only two mutants seems low. There are a number of possible explanations. Some cold—regulated genes may be essential for survival at low temperature. Thus, an insertion into these genes would be lethal. Additionally, changes in light emission were visually detected, therefore, I may have overlooked mutants that weren't strongly induced. In E. coli, for example, most cold shock proteins are only upregulated 2— to 10—fold (15, 24). It is likely that I would have missed a 2— to 5—fold induction. Perhaps the most likely reason for obtaining only two mutants was due to the time and temperature used in the screen. Induction of Rm 3—16—6 and Rm 5—5—6 at 10°C is much 47 slower and less pronounced than at 15°C. Indeed, K. O'Connell (unpublished data), has screened for mutants using a shift from 30°C to 15°C for 4—6 hours and has obtained 8 cold—regulated mutants in screening a total of 4,000 mutants. Whether the Tn5—luxAB in the mutants inserted into new cold— regulated genes remains to be determined. FUTURE DIRECTIONS The data presented suggest many directions for future work. Induction after a temperature downshift was examined using 30°C as the preshift temperature. It is unknown, therefore, if induction after a shift to 20°C was a function of the absolute post—shift temperature (20°C), the change in temperature (10°C), or both. Use of lower preshift temperatures, such as 25°C and 20°C, would be a first step in addressing this question. Rm 5—5—6 and Rm 3—16—6 displayed similar patterns of induction. It is unknown, however, if the similarity is due to control by the same regulatory mechanisms. Secondary transposon mutagenesis could be used to tag the regulatory elements, followed by cloning and sequencing of the tagged gene to reveal the identity of the regulatory gene. Studies to date have been limited to TY or GTS media. We have not characterized response to low temperature in the soil. Also, we have not evaluated the effect of insertion upon survivability in the soil. Long term soil studies need to be done. At this time it is not known if the response to low temperature is cold-specific or a general stress response. Response to other environmental stresses has not been 48 49 characterized in either Rm 3—16-6 or Rm 5—5—6. Measuring light emission before and after other stresses, such as osmotic shock or carbon limitation, will evaluate the specificity of the cold-regulated genes. BIBLIOGRAPHY 10. BIBLIOGRAPHY Altschul, A.F., W. Gish, w. Miller, E.W. Myers, and D.J. Lipman. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403—410. Ay—Gay, Y., Y. Aharonowitz, and G. Cohen. 1992. Streptomyces contain a 7.0 kDa cold shock like protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 20:5478. Baracchini, E., and H. Bremer. 1991. Control of rRNA synthesis in Escherichia coli at increased rrn gene dosage. J. Biol. Chem. 266:11753—11760. Beringer, J.E. 1974. R factor transfer in Rhizobium leguminosarum. J. Gen. Microbiol. 84:188—198. Broeze, R.J., C.J. Solomon, and D.H. Pope. 1978. Effects of low temperature on in Vivo and in vitro protein synthesis in Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas fluorescens. J. Bacteriol. 134:861—874. Cloutier, J., D. Prevost, P. Nadeau, and H. Antoun. 1992. Heat and cold shock protein synthesis in arctic and temperate strains of rhizobia. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 58:2846—2853. Cole, J.R., C.L. Olsson, J.W.B. Hershey, M. Grunberg— Manago, and M. Nomura. 1987. Feedback regulation of rRNA synthesis in Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 198:383— 392. Condon, C., S. French, C. Squires, and C.L. Squires. 1993. Depletion of functional ribosomal RNA operons in Escherichia coli causes increased expression of the remaining intact copies. EMBO J. 12:4305—4315. Das, H.K., and A. Goldstein. 1968. Limited capacity for protein synthesis at zero degrees centigrade in Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 31:209—226. De Bruijn, F.J., and S. Rossbach. 1994. Transposon mutagenesis. In P. Gerhardt, R.G.E. Murray, W.A. Wood, and N.R. Krieg (ed.), Methods for general and molecular 50 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 51 biology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington D.C. Devereux, J., P. Haeberli, and o. Smithies. 1984. A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX. Nucleic Acids Res. 12:387—395. Didier, D.R., J. Schiffenbauer, S.L. Woulfe, M. Zacheis, and B.D. Schwartz. 1988. Characterization of the cDNA encoding a protein binding to the major histocompatibility complex class II Y box. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 85:7322-7326. Figurski, D., and D. Helinski. 1979. Replication of an origin containing derivative of plasmid RK2 dependent on a plasmid function provided in trans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 76:1648-1652. Friedman, H., P. Lu, and A. Rich. 1969. Ribosomal subunits produced by cold sensitive initiation of protein synthesis. Nature. 223:909—913. Goldstein, J., N.S. Pollitt, and M. Inouye. 1990. Major cold shock protein of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 87:283—287. Gourse, R.L., H.A. de Boer, and M. Inouye. 1986. DNA determinants of rRNA synthesis in E. coli: growth rate dependent regulation, feedback inhibition, upstream activation, antitermination. Cell. 44:197—205. Herendeen, S.L., R.A. VanBogelen, and F.C. Neidhardt. 1979. Levels of major proteins of Escherichia coli during growth at different temperatures. J. Bacteriol. 139:185-194. Honeycutt, R. J., M. McClelland and, B.W.S. Sobral. 1993. Physical map of the genome of Rhizobium meliloti 1021. J. Bacteriol. 175:6945—6952. Ingraham, J. 1987. Effect of temperature, pH, water activity, and pressure on growth, p. 1543—1554. In F.C. Neidhardt, J.L. Ingraham, K.B. Low, B. Magasanik, M. Schaechter, and H.E. Umbarger (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: cellular and molecular biology, vol. 2. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. Jinks-Robertson, S., R.L. Gourse, and M. Nomura. 1983. Expression of rRNA and tRNA genes in Escherichia coli: evidence for feedback regulation by products of rRNA operons. Cell. 33:865—876. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 52 Jones, P.G., M. Cashel, G. Glaser, and F.C. Neidhardt. 1992. Function of a relaxed—like state following temperature downshifts in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 174:3903—3914. Jones, P.G., and M. Inouye. 1994. The cold—shock response a hot topic. Mol. Microbiol. 11:811—818. Jones, P.G., R. Krah, S.R. Tafuri, and A.P. Wolffe. 1992. DNA gyrase, CS7.4, and the cold shock response in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 174:5798—5802. Jones, P.G., R.A. VanBogelen, and F.C. Neidhardt. 1987. Induction of proteins in response to low temperature in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 169:2092—2095. Kiss, G.B., B. Vincze, Z. Kalman, T. Forrai, and A. Kondorosi. 1979. Genetic and biochemical analysis of mutants affected in nitrate reduction in Rhizobium meliloti. J. Gen. Microbiol. 113:105—118. La Teana, A., A. Brandi, M. Falconi, R. Spurio, C.L. Pon, and C.O. Gualerzi. 1991. Identification of a cold shock transcriptional enhancer of the Escherichia coli gene encoding nucleoid protein H—NS. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 88:10907—10911. Laemmli, U.K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 227:680—685. Mackow, E.R., and F.N. Chang. 1983. Correlation between RNA synthesis and ppGpp content in Escherichia coli during temperature shifts. Mol. Gen. Genet. 192:5—9. Meade, H.M., S.R. Long, G.B. Ruvkun, S.R. Brown, and F.M. Ausubel. 1982. Physical and genetic characterization of symbiotic and auxotrophic mutants of Rhizobium meliloti induced by transposon Tn5 mutagenesis. J. Bacteriol. 149:114—122. Meighen, R.A. 1991. Molecular biology of bacterial bioluminescence. Microbiol Rev. 55:123—142. Nomura, M. 1990. History of ribosome research: a personal account, p. 3—55. In W.E. Hill, A. Dahlberg, R.A. Garrett, P.B. Moore, D. Schlessinger, and J.R. Warner (ed.), The ribosome: structure, function, and evolution. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. Rossbach, S. Personal communication. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 53 Ryals, J., R. Little, and H. Bremer. 1982. Temperature dependence of RNA synthesis parameters in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 151:879—887. Sambrook, J., E.F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. second ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. Srivastava, A.K., and D. Schlessinger. 1990. Mechanism and regulation of bacterial ribosomal RNA processing. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 44:105—129. Takebe, Y., A. Miura, D.M. Bedwell, M. Tam, and M. meura. 1985. Increased expression of ribosomal genes during inhibition of ribosome assembly in Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 184:23—30. willimsky, G., H. Bang, G. Fischer, and M.A. Marahiel. 1992. Characterization of cspB, a Bacillus subtilis inducible cold shock gene affecting cell viability at low temperatures. J. Bacteriol. 174:6326—6335. Wistcw, G. 1990. Cold shock and DNA binding. Nature. 344:823-824. Wolk, C.P. personal communication. Wolk, C.P., Y. Cai, and J.-M. Panoff. Use of a transposon with luciferase as a reporter to identify environmentally responsive genes in a cyanobacterium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 88:5355—5359. Young, R.A., R. Macklis, and J.A. Steitz. 1979. Sequence of the 16 S—23 S spacer region in two ribosomal RNA operons of Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 254:3264— 3271. l l 555 i ll 1.. 41 0 3 g 2 1 3 S E I R AH R B I L 8 V I N U E T AH T S