42.2.41...‘ .r. A 5 or}: ”My :1 ,4u»..a ... p. A." ‘ ’fgy‘l3i. .. .. y‘ !. )\. . f 2!; i x}: . Elm. an.» . 2....» ,7,v».5 x“: x 391‘.» o . -.-. u" -. nu‘ :w “up.” ‘1' " “ I'o-;-)WO( '1' g a .. 15w. ;......a..a......_,..;f Em?" .. E . fifétfl? a: 2.5.? f SETLZ; V I. . , . . a . .-.L THES'S ”W sTATE WW5 3m \ ll Ill/IIHHHUII/l/IMIIIHill/ill!!! iii“ ‘ I l I '4 3' 3129301050U¢I588 LIBRARY Michigan State University z , This is to certify that the dissertation entitled FACTORS CONTROLLING THE TEMPORAL PATTERN OF FEMALE REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR IN RATS presented by LIANG—YO YANG has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for PH. D. degree in NEUROSCIENCE/ ZOOLOGY I / I [I‘ll/1,}, _, 1/ / ajorprofessor DaMmfiqé MS U is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Institution 0- 12771 *mH-h 5*!!! Fa; _ ' PLACE IN RETURN BOX to remove thie checkout from your teoord. TO AVOID FINES return on or betore date due. AIL €517.32 mar JR 4- | l fi—T . J J1 J i i A u L___JL_.l:._l ”TV—Wm MSU to An Affirmative Aztlan/Emu Opportunity lnetitution m1 FACTORS CONTROLLING THE TEMPORAL PATTERN OF FEMALE REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR IN RATS By Liang-Yo Yang A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Zoology and Neuroscience Program 1996 ABSTRACT FACTORS CONTROLLING THE TEMPORAL PATTERN OF FEMALE REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR IN RATS By Liang-Yo Yang When given the opportunity, the female rat regulates the copulatory speed. The female’s return latencies and percentage exits following sexual contacts provide robust measures of her temporal copulatory behavior. One possible function of the female’s pacing behavior is to facilitate successful reproduction. When the female controls the copulatory speed, the interintromission intervals are longer and fewer intromissions are sufficient to induce the progestational state of pregnancy. The female’s postejaculatory refractory period (PER) is important to facilitate or allow sperm transport. If the female receives intromissions shortly following ejaculation, sperm transport will be stopped until the next ejaculation. The objectives of the experiments in this dissertation were to investigate (1) the relation of copulatory stimuli to the female’s PER, (2) the relation among vaginocervical stimulation, uterine electromyographic (EMG) activity and female temporal copulatory behavior, and (3) whether the medial preoptic area (MPOA) of hypothalamus is involved in regulating female pacing behavior. Female sexual behavior was tested in a two-compartment pacing chamber. Results indicated that the ejaculation duration and preejaculatory intromission frequency were positively correlated with the female’s PER. Different hormone replacements also influenced the female’s PER. No evidence was found to support the idea that the penile cup formation, the presence of a seminal plug, prostate secretions, or the number of pelvic thrusts during ejaculation contributed to the f emale’s PER. Consistent with previous reports, copulation had an immediate effect on uterine EMG activity. Moreover, the duration of uterine EMG activity associated with ejaculation was significantly longer than that associated with intromission or mount. This finding coincides with the fact that the female’s return latency following ejaculation is significantly longer than that following intromission or mount. Possibly the longer duration of uterine activity associated with ejaculation contributes to the f emale’s PER. The MPOA plays an important role in facilitating female sexual motivation in rats. MPOA lesions significantly increased the female’s latency to return to the male’s chamber following intromission and ejaculation. This finding suggests that MPOA lesions decrease female sexual motivation. Moreover, the significant increase of the female’s return latencies following MPOA lesions parallels the change seen in male sexual behavior following MPOA lesions. It is suggested that the MPOA plays a similar role in regulating the temporal copulatory behavior of male and female rats. To my wife Fu-Mei Chen my daughter Rena Yang my parents Chin-Nan Yang and Dwei Lin and my parents-in-law Tsen-Ken Chen and Jui-Wun l-Isiao iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my major professor Dr. Lynwood G. Clemens, who always inspired me, encouraged me, and challenged me intellectually during the past five years. Without his constant support and full trust in my ability, I would not have completed this project. I would also like to thank my committee members Dr. Kay E. Holekamp, Dr. Antonio A. Nunez, and Dr. Ralph A. Pax for their guidance and suggestions on various aspects of my dissertation. I gratefully acknowledge Dr. Kevin E. McKenna at Northwestern University for teaching me the electromyographic recording technique and Dr. Ralph A. Pax for giving me additional advice on this technique. I am grateful for my colleagues Dr. Anthony E. Ackerman, Mr. Gary M. Lange and Dr. Kevin L. Sinchak for teaching me a variety of techniques used in the course of these experiments. I also wish to thank Mr. Alan S. Eliott for teaching me how to use Computer Statistics and Drawing Programs. In addition, I appreciate Miss Yu-Wen Chung and Dr. Jimmy Fang for their special help and friendship. Moreover, I would like to thank my parents (Chin-Nan and Dwei) for providing me with the opportunity and the financial support to complete my dissertation. Further, I deeply thank my parents-in-law for their constant support. I am also indebted to my daughter Rena, who is seven months old, for her cooperation in the past seven months. Finally and most importantly, I would like to give my special thanks and love to my wife Fu-Mei Chen, who gave me one hundred percent support through both the good and the bad. Without her thoughtfulness and full support, I would have not been able to complete my dissertation. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................ ix LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................... xv INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 1 General Description of Female Rat’s Sexual Behavior ................................ 2 Significance of the Study of Temporal Pattern of Female Sexual Behavior ......... 4 Diversity of Testing Chambers in Studying Female Pacing Behavior .............. 6 Factors Influencing the Temporal Patterns of Female Sexual Behavior ............ 7 Sensory Innervation of Genitalia in Female Rats ....................................... 9 Vaginocervical Stimulation, Uterine Activity and Female Sexual Behavior ....... 10 Relation of MPOA to Female Sexual Behavior ..................................... 1 1 Summary ................................................................................... 1 3 EXPERIMENT 1: RELATION OF INTROMISSIONS TO THE FEMALE’S POST EJACULATORY REFRACTORY PERIOD IN RATS ....................... 15 ABSTRACT ................................................................................ 1 5 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................... 16 GENERAL METHODS .................................................................. 18 EXPERIMENT 1A: THE TEMPORAL PATTERN OF FEMALE SEXUAL BEHAVIOR TESTED IN OUR MODIFIED PACING CHAMBER ............... 20 METHOD ................................................................................... 20 RESULTS ................................................................................... 2 1 EXPERIMENT lB: EFFECT OF DIFFERENT NUMBERS OF INTROMISSIONS ON THE FEMALE TEMPORAL COPULATORY BEHAVIOR ................................................................................ 28 METHOD .................................................................................. 29 RESULTS .................................................................................. 3 0 DISCUSSION ................................................................................. 3 5 EXPERIMENT 2: FUNCTION OF INT ROMISSIONS IN REIATIONTO THE INTROMISSION RETURN LATENCY OF FEMALE RATS DURING PACED SEXUAL BEHAVIOR ............................................ 41 ABSTRACT ............................................................................... 41 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................... 42 GENERAL METHODS .............................................................. 44 EXPERIMENT 2A: RELATION OF MULTIPLE INTROMISSIONS '10 THE FEMALE’S INDIVIDUAL INTROMISSION RETURN LATENCY ............................................................................. 46 METHOD .................................................................................. 46 RESULTS ............................................................................... 48 EXPERIMENT 2B: INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT HORMONE REPLACEMENTS ON THE FEMALE PACING BEHAVIOR ................ 54 METHOD ................................................................................ 55 RESULTS ................................................................................ 56 DISCUSSION ............................................................................... 56 EXPERIMENT 3: INFLUENCE OF MALE RELATED STIMULI ON FEMALE POST EJACULATORY PERIOD IN RATS .............................. 62 ABSTRACT ............................................................................. 62 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................... 63 GENERAL METHODS ............................................................... 66 EXPERIMENT 3A: EFFECT OF STIMULUS FACTORS ON FEMALE POSTEJACULATORY REFRACTORY PERIOD ................................... 68 MATERIALS AND METHODS ........................................................ 69 RESULTS ................................................................................ 72 EXPERIMENT 3B: RELATION OF THE EJACULATION DURATION AND PREEJACULATORY INT ROMISSIONS TO THE FEMALE’S POSTEJACULATORY REFRACTORY PERI OD .................................... 72 MATERIALS AND METHODS ......................................................... 73 RESULTS ................................................................................... 75 DISCUSSION .................................................................................. 87 EXPERIMENT 4: CORRELATION OF UTERINE ACTIVITY WITH THE TEMPORAL PATTERN OF FEMALE SEXUAL BEHAVIOR IN RATS ....... 91 ABSTRACT ................................................................................ 91 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................... 92 METHOD ................................................................................... 92 RESULTS ................................................................................... 96 DISCUSSION . ........................................................................... 103 EXPERIMENT 5: SEXUAL MOTIVATION AND THE MEDIAL PREOP'TIC AREA IN FEMALE RATS ............................................................ 105 ABSTRACT ............................................................................. 1 05 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................... 106 GENERAL METHODS .................................................................. 109 EXPERIMENT 5A: INFLUENCE OF ELECTROLYTIC MPOA LESIONS ON THE FEMALE PACING BEHAVIOR ........................................ 11 1 METHOD ................................................................................ 1 1 1 RESULTS ................................................................................ 1 13 vii EXPERIMENT 5B: EFFECT OF CHEMICAL MPOA LESIONS ON THE FEMALE TEMPORAL COPULATORY BEHAVIOR ...................... 12 1 METHOD ............................................................................. 1 2 1 RESULTS ................................................................................ 1 23 DISCUSSION ......................................................................... 13 1 GENERAL DISCUSSION ..................................................................... 135 Si gnifrcance of Female Temporal Sexual Behavior ................................. 13 5 Stimulus Factors that Affect Female Temporal Copulatory Behavior .............. 136 Relation of Uterine Activity to Female Pacing Behavior ............................ 140 Cenual Neural Correlates of Female Temporal Copulatory Behavior ............. 141 Comparison of MPOA Lesions in Male and Female Rats ............................ 143 Future Directions .......................................................................... 143 Summary and Conclusions ............................................................. 144 LIST OF REFERENCES ....................................................................... 147 viii Figure l . Figure 2 . Figure 3 . LIST OF FIGURES Return latency following mounts, intromissions, and ejaculations for three ejaculatory series (N=67). The female's return latency following an ejaculation (PER) was significantly longer than her return latency following an intromission (IRL) and mount (MRL) for three ejaculatory series. The IRL was significantly longer than the MRL in the second and third ejaculatory series. The female's PER increased significantly as the ejaculatory series increased. The f emale's IRL increased slightly over three ejaculatory series but there was no significant increase between two continuous ejaculatory series. There was no significant increase in the female's MRL for three ejaculatory series. Data were analyzed by ANOVA for repeated measures. Bar represents mean i SEM. ** p<0.01 ........................................ 22 The percentage exits following mounts, intromissions, and ejaculations for three ejaculatory series. The percentage exit after ejaculation was significantly higher than that following intromissions which was higher than that following mounts. There was no significant difference among three ejaculatory series for the percentage exit after mounts, intromissions, and ejaculations. Data were analyzed by ANOVA for repeated measures. Bar represents mean i SEM. ** p<0.01. N=67 ................................................................ 24 Relation of the number of intromissions prior to ejaculation and the f emale's return latency following an ejaculation (PER) for three ejaculatory series. There was a positive correlation between the number of intromissions received by the female before ejaculation over three ejaculatory series and the female's PER. Data were analyzed by Correlation analysis (r=0.425, p<0.0001). N 2201 ........................................ 26 ix Figure 4 . Figure 5 . Figure 6 . Effect of intromissions on f emale's latency to return to the male following an ejaculation (PER, open bar, N211) and following an intromission without ejaculation (I RL, solid bar, N=8). ** Return latency after an ejaculation was significantly shorter for 0-1 intromission group than the other groups (p<0.01). * Return latency after an ejaculation was significantly longer for the 24-31 intromission group than the 5-15 intromission group (p<0.05). # The PER of females receiving 24-31 intromissions was significantly longer than those receiving 0-1 or 2-4 intromissions (p<0.01). $ The female’s IRL was significantly shorter than her PER in 2-4, 5-15 and 24—31 intromission groups (p<0.01, paired t test). There was no significant difference between the f emale’s return latencies following an ejaculation of 2-4 and 5-15 intromission groups. There was no significant difference among the female's mean return latencies following an intromission of the different intromission groups. All data except comparison of IRL and PER within the same group were analyzed by ANOVA for repeated measures followed by SNK post-hoe tests. Bar represents mean 1 SEM .......................................................... 31 The relation between the number of intromissions preceding ejaculation and the female's return latency following an ejaculation (PER). The number of intromissions received by the female prior to ejaculation in four groups was positively correlated with her PER. Data were analyzed by Correlation analysis (120.613, p<0.0001). N=44 .......................................... 33 Four representative portions of individual intromission return latencies (IRLs) and three PERs of females receiving three ejaculations are illustrated: (i) the first 4 IRLs (1, 2, 3 , 4), (ii) 4 IRLs right before and 3 IRLs right after the lst ejaculation (L-3, L-2, L-l, L, E1, 1, 2, 3), (iii) 3 IRLs right before and 2 IRLs right after the 2nd ejaculation (L—2, L- 1, L, E2, 1, 2), and (iv) 3 IRLs right before the 3rd ejaculation (L-2, L-l, L, E3). Dataare mean _-+_- SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Fisher's PLSD post-hoc tests. L: the intromission right before ejaculation. El, E2, and E3 stand for the lst, 2nd and 3rd ejaculation, respectively. ** p<0.01, each individual IRL compared with PER in the same ejaculatory series; #p<0.05, comparison between adjacent PERs. The number of animals for each intromission or ejaculation is indicated in the same sequential order as in Figure 6: S, 9, 7, 7, 8, 8, 7, 9, 11 (E1), 6, 5, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11 (E2), 2, 5, 8, 9, 11, 11 (E3). // indicates separation of 4 sets of continuous IRLs ........................... 50 Figure 7. Figure 8. Figure 9 . Figure 10. Figure l 1. Figure l 2 . Three representative portions of individual intromission return latencies (IRLs) of females receiving a large number of intromissions before ejaculation. These include 3 portions of consecutive IRLs: (i) the first 3 IRLs (1, 2, 3), (ii) 21RLs right before and 2 IRLs right after the first prolonged IRL (N-2, N-l, N, N+1, N+2), and (iii)3 IRLs right before ejaculation (L-2, L—l, L, E). Data are mean :t SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Fisher's PLSD post-hoc tests. N: the intromission inducing the first prolonged IRL. L: the intromission right before ejaculation. E: ejaculation. ** p<0.01, * p<0.05 compared with the first prolonged IRL. The number of animals for each intromission or ejaculation is indicated in the same sequential order as in Figure 7: 6, 6, 8, 8, 8, 10 (N), 6, 6, 6, 7, 10, 9 (E). // indicates separation of 3 sets of continuous IRLs ....... 52 Comparison of the PER of females receiving two different hormone treatments. In the first week, the females received injections of 0.5 pg EB for three consecutive days 24 hours later followed by an injection of 0.5 mg progesterone. In the second week, the females were given an injection of 50 pg EB 48 hours later followed by an injection of 0.5 mg progesterone. Bar represents mean -_i-_ SEM. Data were analyzed by paired t test. ** P = 0.0007. N = 14 ............................. 57 compares the ejaculation duration of males between the 4— 18 and the 0-1 intromission Groups (4-18 I and 0-1 I Groups). The male’s ejaculation duration in the 4— 18 I Group is significantly longer than that in the 0-1 I Group (t = 4.065, p = 0.0097, N = 6). Dataare expressed as mean i SEM and analyzed by paired t-test. ** p<0.01 ............................................ 77 compares the postejaculatory refractory period (PER) of females between the 4-18 and the 0-1 intromission Groups (4-18 I and 0-1 I Groups). The PER of females in the 4» 18 I Group is significantly longer than that in the 0-1 I Group (t = 4.155, p = 0.0089, N = 6). Dataare expressed as mean i SEM and analyzed by paired t-test. ** p<0.01 .......................................................................... 79 shows the relation of the male’s ejaculation duration (ED) to the female’s postejaculatory refractory period (PER). There is a significantly positive correlation between the male’s E) and the female’s PER (r = 0.814, p<0.0001, N=22) ......................... 81 shows the relation of the number of intromissions prior to ejaculation to the male’s ejaculation duration. The preejaculatory intromission frequency is positively correlated with the male’s ejaculation duration (r = 0.771 , p < 0.0001 , N = 22) ............................................................................. 83 Figure 13. Figure l 4. Figure l 5. Figure l 6 . Figure 1 7 . The relation of preejaculatory intromission frequency to the female’s postejaculatory refractory period (PER). The preejaculatory intromission frequency is significantly correlated with the female’s PER (r = 0.611, p = 0.002, N = 22) ................................................................................... 85 shows the typical uterine EMG activity associated with a mount, intromission, and ejaculation. The duration of uterine EMG activity associated with an ejaculation seemed longer than that associated with an intromission or a mount. E ejaculation;I: intromission; M: mount. Amplitude: 1 cm = 1 mV. Time scale (paper speed): 1 cm = 2 seconds. Arrows indicate the approximate time for dismount .................................... 97 Comparison of the durations of uterine EMG activity associated with a mount, intromission, and ejaculation. The duration of uterine EMG activity associated with an ejaculation was significantly longer than that associated with a mount or an intromission (** p<0.01). There was no significant difference found between durations of uterine EMG activity associated with a mount and an intromission. Dataare expressed as mean i SEM in seconds and analyzed by one way ANOVA followed by Fisher’s PLSD post-hoc tests ...................................................................... 99 Comparison of the female’s return latencies following a mount (MRL), intromission (IRL), and ejaculation (PER). The female’s PER was significantly longer than her IRL or MRL (* p<0.05). Data are expressed as mean -_+_ SEM in seconds and analyzed by one way ANOVA followed by Fisher’s PLSD post-hoc tests .................................................. 101 Composite diagrams of largest (shaded area) electrolytic MPOA lesions. Figures and nomenclature from Paxinos and Watson (1986). The Bregma coordinates for each figure on top row from left to right are + 0.20 mm, - 0.30 mm, and - 0.80 mm. The Bregma coordinates for each figure on bottom row from left to right are - 0.92 mm, and - 1.30 mm. 3V: 3rd ventricle;ac: anterior commissure; aca: anterior commissure, anterior; AHA: anterior hypothalamic area, anterior; BSTMPL: bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, medial division, posterolateral part; BST V: bed nucleus of stria terminalis, ventral division; f: fornix; HDB: nucleus of the horizontal limb of the diagonal band of Broca; IA: lateroanterior hypothalamic nucleus; LH: lateral hypothalamic area; LPO: lateral preoptic area; MPA: medial preoptic area; MPO: medial preoptic nucleus; ox: optic chiasm; PaAP: paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus, anterior parvocellular part; Pe: peri ventricular hypothalamic nucleus; PS: parastrial nucleus; SCh: suprachiasmatic nucleus; SHy: septohypothalarnic nucleus; StHy: striohypothalarnic nucleus; SO: supraoptic nucleus; VDB: nucleus of the vertical limb of the diagonal band of Broca .................. 1 15 xii Figure l 8 . Figure 19. Figure 20. summarizes the f emale’s return latencies following an intromission (intromission return latency, IRL) before surgery and two weeks after surgery in the MPOA electrolytic lesioned group (N = 8) and the MPOA sham- lesioned group (N = 11). Two Way Repeated Measures ANOVA revealed a significant group effect [ F( 1, 17) = 19.481, p = 0.0004], surgery effect [F(1, 17) = 16.652, p = 0.0008], as well as group x surgery interaction [F(1, 17) = 22.033, p = 0.0002] for the female’s IRL. The SNK post- hoc tests revealed that the postsurgical IRL of females with MPOA electrolytic lesions was significantly longer than the other IRLs (p<0.01). ** p<0.01 .............................................. 117 shows the female’s return latencies following an ejaculation (postejaculatory refractory period, PER) before surgery and two weeks after surgery in the MPOA electrolytic lesioned group (N = 7) and the MPOA sham-lesioned group (N = 11). Two Way Repeated Measures ANOVA revealed a significant group effect [ F(1, 16) = 9.828, p = 0.0064], surgery effect [F(1, 16) = 7.868, p = 0.0127], as well as group x surgery interaction [F( 1, 16) = 11.094, p = 0.0042] for the female’s PER. The SNK post—hoc tests revealed that the postsurgical PER of females with MPOA lesions was significantly longer than the other PERs (p<0.01). ** p