TIIE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HIGH SCHOOL SELF - CONCEPT OF ACADEMIC ABILITY AND SUBSEQUENT ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AT THE COMMUNITY COLLEGE TITesIs‘fOT the Degree of PIT. D. MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY ' KENNETH H.58PROULL ‘ ‘1959‘ ‘ " ‘ 7‘ WWW—p—uw'w‘ul - .w 3‘ ‘1 n._ 5 L 1;;- sum THFQIS . l l‘t/llCIII"5 “'13. 1 StdtC Unitu f3IC)’ 1.... I “mm—mm This is to certify that the thesis entitled JTHE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HIGH SCHOOL SELF CONCEPT OF ACADEMIC ABILITY. AND SUBSEQUENT ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AT THE COMMUNITY COLLEGE presented by ~Kenneth H. Sproull has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for —12h—.-D.—— degree in Education Z/éf ;e%/WL_. Major/ ofessor Date fflZ/é? 0-169 I , , W ~ I903 I L [W JIULM .39 "’ r .. 4 her I i \ ., ‘ ‘ if I N , I I . i I’ l r l ABSTRACT THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HIGH SCHOOL SELF-CONCEPT OF ACADEMIC ABILITY AND SUBSEQUENT ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AT THE COMMUNITY COLLEGE By Kenneth H. Sproull The primary objective of this study was to investi- gate the relationship between self-concept of academic ability, as measured in high school, and subsequent aca— demic achievement and behavior at the local community college. The Problem The "open door" policy of the public community college fosters a heterogeneous student body which, in_ _most instances, includes individuals from every social and economic level. The resulting wide range of student characteristics has brought about a major problem in. developing community college programs and services geared to accommodate diverse personalities, perceptions and abilities. Finding a positive relationship between self- concept of academic ability and academic achievement might suggest academic programs, procedures and services to enable students with low self—concepts of academic ability to successfully complete education or training beyond high Kenneth H. Sproull school. This could lead to a more appropriate and fuller use of this nation's human resources, including the average student, the disadvantaged, and students from minority groups. Procedures The population for this study included 196 students (105 males, 91 females), who were subjects of a longitudi- nal high school study conducted by Brookover and others and subsequently enrolled at the local community college. Eighth and twelfth grade self-concept of academic ability scores, as measured by the Michigan State Univer- sity General Self-Concept of Academic Ability Scale, were available for all students. Additional data collected included grade point averages, choice of curriculum and full-time, part-time attendance for both the first term and the sixth term at the local community college. Correlation coefficients, analysis of variance, t tests and chi square techniques were employed to investi- gate the relationship between self-concept of academic ability and: (1) academic achievement, (2) choice of curriculum, (3) full-time, part-time attendance, and (A) other variables. All data were analyzed separately for males and females. Kenneth H. Sproull Malor Findings was. Analyses of the data indicate that the higher the eighth grade SCAA of males, the more likely they are to: 1. Have a higher grade point average in the first term at the college. 2. Enroll as a full time student for the first term in college. 3. Complete a full time program at the end of two years at the college. A. Enroll in the Arts and Sciences Division rather than the Business Division. The higher the twelfth grade male SCAA, the more likely they are to: 1. Have a higher grade point average in the first term at the college. 2. Enroll as a full time student for the first term at the college. 3. Enroll in the Arts and Sciences Division rather than the Business or Technical Division. The data also reveal that full time males are more likely to have higher grade point averages than part time males in both the first term and the sixth term at the college. Kenneth H. Sproull Females Analyses of the data indicate that for females, the higher the eighth grade SCAA, the more likely they are to enroll in other curricula of the Arts and Sciences Division rather than the teaching curriculum or Business Division. The higher the twelfth grade SCAA, the more likely females are to: 1. Have a higher grade point average in the first term of college. 2. Have a higher grade point average at.the end of two years at the community college. 3. Enroll in the Arts and Sciences Division rather than the Business Division. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HIGH SCHOOL SELF-CONCEPT OF ACADEMIC ABILITY AND SUBSEQUENT ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AT THE COMMUNITY COLLEGE By lrl Kenneth Hf Sproull A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Counseling, Personnel Services, and Educational Psychology 1969 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. To those people who gave generously of their time, experience and support, the author wishes to express his appreciation. Dr. Walter F. Johnson, Chairman, gave direction in the planning and reporting of this study despite his many commitments at home and abroad. His guidance and under- standing were essential to the project. Dr. Paul Dressel, under whom I both studied and worked, helped to bring about a better understanding of the techniques and value of institutional research. His advice and counsel have not only been invaluable for this study, but for activities of this author over the past years. Drs. Bill Kell and Willa Norris were understanding, encouraging and patient over the period of time needed to complete this study. I am indebted to Dr. Wilbur Brookover, whose research was the basis for this study, for his cOOperation, his consultation and his friendship. In addition, I am grateful for the long hours dedi- cated to discussion, criticism, suggestions and final preparation provided by the following people: Dr. Jack Thorsen, a confidant whose support and encouragement helped in many ways. 11 Ruth Ann Hamlin, whose competent assistance in preparing the manuscript was greatly appreciated. My wife, Natalie Sproull, whose patience and understanding when coupled with her knowledge of research proved invaluable in the completion of this project. I am deeply grateful to all those people mentioned above for their time, assistance and advice. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . ii LIST OF TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . vi Chapter I. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . 1 Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Problem . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II. RELATED LITERATURE . . . . . . . . 11 Specific Hypotheses and Questions . . 18 III. PROCEDURE . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Population and Site . . . . . 22 Major Variables and Instrumentation. . 23 Definitions. . . . . . . . . . 26 Data Collection . . . . . . . 28 Data Analysis Procedures . . . . . 29 IV. DATA ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . 30 Males. . . . . . . . . . . . 30 Females . . . 32 The Relationship between 8th and. 12th SCAA and Achievement . . . . . . 33 SCAA and Counseling . . . . . . 39 SCAA and Transfers. . . . . 39 SCAA and Choice of Curriculum . . . A0 SCAA.and Academic Achievement for "Others". . . . . . . . . . AA V. DISCUSSION . . . . . . . . . . . A7 The Relationship Between SCAA and Academic Achievement . . . . . A8 The Relationship Between SCAA and Withdrawals . . 52 The Relationship Between Full- Time and Part- time Attendance and SCAA . . . 55 The Relationship Between Full Time-- Part Time Attendance and GPA . . . 59 iv Chapter The Relationship Between SCAA and Counseling . The Relationship Between SCAA and Transfers. . The Relationship Between SCAA and Division Entered . . Summary . . Suggestions. BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . APPENDIX Page 60 61 62 6’4 66 7O 75 Table l. 10. LIST OF TABLES Page Correlations between seventh grade grade point average, measured intelligence, and self concept of ability for males and females . . 8 Hoyt's analysis of variance reliability coeffi- cients for general self-concept of academic ability scale; grades 7-12 longitudinal study . 26 Correlations between 8th and 12th grade SCAA and grade point in the fall of 1966 and the spring of 1968 for both longitudinal and "other" stu- dents by males and females . . . . . . . 31 Comparison of means of 8th grade SCAA between full-time and part-time students at end of first and sixth terms at community college . . 36 Comparison of means of 12th grade SCAA between full time and part time students at end of first and sixth terms at community college . . 37 Comparison of means of grade point averages between full-time and part time students at end of first term at community college . . . 38 Comparison of means of grade point averages between full time and part time students at end of sixth term at community college . . . 38 Association between 8th grade SCAA and three divisions entered at community college by male students . . . . . . . . . . . Al Association between 8th grade SCAA and two divisions entered at the community college by male students . . . . . . . . . . . Al Association between 12th grade SCAA and divisions entered at the community college by male students . . . . . . . . . . A2 vi Table ll. l2. 13. Page Association between 8th grade SCAA and Cur- riculums entered at the community college by female students . . . . . . . . . . . A3 Association between 12th grade SCAA and division entered at the community college by female Students 0 o o o o o o a o c 0‘ I43 Pearson Product Moment Correlations of 12th grade SCAA with community college grade point average for fall term 1966 and spring term 1968 for longitudinal and "other" subjects . . A5 vii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between students' self-concept of academic ability as measured in high school and their subsequent achievement in the local community college. Problem Two important educational movements taking place in our present society require our attention and concern. The first is the concept of providing education and training beyond high school to a greater proportion of our popula- tion with particular emphasis on minority and disadvantaged groups. The second is the unprecedented growth in the development of the public junior community college which is attempting to provide educational opportunities for millions of our youth who would not normally continue their educa- tion or training beyond high school. It appears that one of the most significant develop- ments in education in the 20th century will be the creation and diffusion of two year public colleges, presently growing faster than any other segment of American higher education.1 Fields2 calls the two year college movement part of a revolution which, though long underway, has only recently been understood to have accomplished profound changes in education. The two year college claims an unique place in Ameri- can higher education by meeting student needs not adequately served by secondary schools, four year colleges or univer- sities. The public community college, in particular, has opened its doors to all high school graduates who meet minimal educational requirements. Such a policy fosters a heterogeneous student body which, in most instances, includes individuals from almost every social and economic level.3 This wide range of student characteristics has brought about the major problem of developing community college services and_programs geared to accommodate diverse person- alities, perceptions and abilities.“ lClyde E. Blocker, Robert H. Plummer and Richard-C. Richardson, Jr., The Two Year College: A Social Synthesis (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 19657. 2Ralph R. Fields, The Community College Movement (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 1962). 3Blocker, Plummer and Richardson, op. cit. “Ibid. Past research makes it possible to make broad observations about the characteristics of community college students. Generally speaking, compared with the university student, the community college student is more likely to: 1. Be older (5:2). (The comparison here concerns entering freshmen.) 2. Aspire to a higher career goal than can be supported by his financial or academic ability (5:7). 3. Have a lower evaluation of himself (5:16). A. Have preferred another institution (5:5). . Live with his family at home (6:338). . See himself as not fully prepared for college work (6:335). 7. Be concerned with social mobility (7:13). 8. Be satisfied with short range gains rather than long range possibilities (7:13-lA). 9. Be uncertain about his occupational goals (8:8). 5Robert J. Panos, "Some Characteristics of Junior College Students," ACE Research Reports, Vol. I, No. 2, Washington, D. C.: American Council on Education, 1966. 6Alice Thurston, "Now That We Are Nine Feet Tall: A Look At Junior College Students," Junior College Journal, 32 (February, 1962), pp. 33A-339. 7James M. Richards and Tracy A. Braskamp, "Who Goes Where to Junior College," ACT Research Reports, 20 (July, 1967), American College Testing Program, Iowa City, Iowa. 8Leland F. Medsker, "The Junior College Student," Junior College Student Personnel Programs: Appraisal and Developmegg, National Committee for Appraisal and Develop- ment of Junior College Student Personnel Programs, Carnegie Corporation, November, 1965, Part III, pp. 1-30. 10. Be conventional and authoritarian (8:15—16). 11. Be employed part time or full time (8:13). 12. Be enrolled on a part time basis (8:2). 13. Have a middle range high school grade point average (8:7). 1A. Select an applied science or voc-technical program rather than a liberal arts prograMI(8:16). 15. Have a mechanical or technical aptitude (8:16). 16. Be in need of remedial instruction (8:16). 17. Lack independence, social maturity, self- assurance, sophistication and intellectual disposition (9:9). 18. Be the first member of his family to attend college (9:9). 19. Be in a lower socio—economic class (10). 20. Rely more on his own earnings rather than financial resources (10). 21. Have a father who is a worker rather than an employer or professional man (10). 22. Be more practical in college selection (low cost, nearness to home, employment) (10). 23. Be less committed to education (in the academic sense) (11:13). 2A. Interrupt or terminate his program before earning a degree (11:13). 9Dorothy M. Knoell, "Focus on the Transfer Program," Junior College Journal, 35 (May, 1965), pp. 5-9. lORobert J. Panos, Alexander w. Astin and John A. Creager, "National Norms for Entering College Freshmen," ACT Research Reports, Vol. 2, No. 7, Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education, 1967. 11"Variation by Institutional Level," College Student Profiles: Norms for the ACT Assessment, Iowa City, Iowa, ACT Research and DeveIOpment Division, American College Testing Program, 1966. There is certainly a need to know the characteris- tics of community college students and their impact on the institution. However, most of the previous research has been limited to identifying characteristics and traits rather than providing data which could suggest programs and services enabling students with these characteristics to successfully complete education and training beyond high school. Other limitations of previous research bear noting., Most of these studies compare community college students with university students. However, research conducted by the American College Testing Program indicates that there is as much student variation within community colleges as between two year and four year colleges.l2 Therefore, additional research on student variation within the com— munity college would appear most appropriate. Most of the previous studies have been descriptive or comparative. Data collection generally has been on a "one shot" cross sectional basis. Almost no studies are based upon sequential data gathered over a long period of time from the same subjects to answer questions about developmental phenomena. Furthermore, very little research has been based upon a theoretical formulation from which hypotheses, l2Ibid. which may indicate in advance student behavior (achievement) in the community college, are derived and tested. Studies in the "Sociology of Learning" recently reviewed by Boocockl3 reflect an emerging concern for col- lecting information on the social context within which the student learns rather than the characteristics or traits of the student as has been the case in educational psychology. One theory which does provide a socio-psychological conception of student behavior is that of Brookover.lLl His research was based on the theoretical framework commonly identified as the symbolic interaction theory of behavior. The basic postulate is that academic behavior or school learning is limited by the student's self concept of his ability. He further postulates that self concept results from the expectations and evaluations held by significant others as perceived by the student. 15 The research of Brookover and others represented a six year study of the relation of self concept of academic l3Sarane S. Boocock, "Toward a Sociology of Learning: A Selective Review of Existing Research," Sociology of Education, XXXIX (Winter, 1966). l“Wilbur B. Brookover, "A Social Psychological Con- ception of Classroom Learning," School and Society (February, 1959)- 15Wilbur B. Brookover, Ann Patterson and Shailer Thomas, Self-Concept of Ability and School Achievement, Final Report of Cooperative Research Project No. 8A5, Office of Education (East Lansing: Bureau of Research and Publications, College of Education, Michigan State ability to school achievement in one school class while in the 7th through the 12th grades. Brookover'sl6 investigations have clearly indicated that many students are impeded in their academic perfor- mance by low self concept of academic ability to achieve in academic tasks. 17 Davis, in his review of Brookover's investigations, noted that the study was carefully designed and executed and adds significantly to the knowledge that we have about students and their achievement in schools. It should be noted that in Brookover's study correla- tion between 7th grade GPA and general self concept scores was obtained with the effect of IQ partialled out for both the boys and girls. The relevant coefficients of correla- . tion are shown in Table 1 with and without the effect of the third variable partialled. Even when the effect of the University, 1962). Wilbur B..Brookover, Jean D. LePere, Don Hamachek, Shailer Thomas and Edsel L. Erickson, Self Concept of Ability and School Achievement II, U. S. Office of Education Cooperative Research Project No. 1636 (East Lansing: Bureau of Educational Research Services, Michigan State University, 1965). Wilbur B. Brookover, Edsel L. Erickson and Lee M. Joiner, Self Concept of Ability and School Achievement, III, U. S. Office of Educational Cooperative Research Project No. 2831 (East Lansing: Educational Publication Services, Michigan State Univer- sity, 1967). l61b1d. 17Donald A. Davis, "A Review of Self Concept of Ability and School Achievement," The Personnel and Guidance Journal, Vol. XLII, No. 5 (January, 196A). .mmHMEom now we. can moame now me. mfi pamocooueamm use ..e.H .amo macaw Amm.a mo cofipmampnoo maaapasz «29* AH. AH. «me we. we. aHIpamocoouonm am. ma. .o.H pm. pm. OIm I «ma ape mm. we. onm me. He. 0H I emu new Ammuz mamuz emaaoppcoo Ammuz mamnz onEom mam: mammahm> monEom moans oopmamhpoo emafioppcoo mammapm> usage emaaoaScoo magmapm> oz mmapmflnm> mpsmflofimmooo sofipmammmoo *.mmame6m one mmame mom mpaaanm mo pooocoolmaom new .mosowflaaopcfi ompdmmme .mwmno>m pQHOQ oompw mompmlnuco>om comzpmn mGOfipmHmLLOOII.H mqm6H mo. one swap mmoa pm mocmoHMchHm mmuMOHocH * Ha. mauz *Am. mmuz *Az. mmuz 30.- mm uz we mpa\epmH aaom *Hm. mmuz *ma. mmuz *mz. mzuz *om. mm "2 we mpa\3pma aaom Hm. amuz NH. mm uz mm mpa\npm