y - , a..." 3.3 3 I}: J . a; 3 w... ,..aw.w..n.w.ua:.. £31 x... . {$.va v.05. . . b3 _ t....€...1su.wunu .flnmnunkéfim. . II .cki—uJfl. . at! .: 2.6.2.: 31%? fiaflnfi : ‘ - 4 ‘ S 11.!!- « u All ll. 5. l3! V19. ., . a v 35...: P3... .. quarwnu. i .. u! {an 5W {It 2. 3... 5..Y“.Iu .1296.“ a :3 4’- 1:?! :41, V '1 a», (1.3.... 7...... Jo" . .55.»... {.5 kahunrl . . 51.1.... . ‘1. . .. . 1.. .. ‘ . y... 5.... 2:92.33: 1.1.3. ‘ 4 .3: . . .55.... 3.....1! 2 . m». .5mw.....3 it... ,. 51... a»... t f f .32 IfltflVh.) ..........:.1.1.., A: . THES!S MICHIGAN STATE UNIV l \llllllllllll \ ll\\\\\\\\\‘.\\\\\\\\\ll 3 1293 01566 3739 I This is to certify that the dissertation entitled ELECTRORHEOLOGY 0F FLUID FOODS presented by Christopher R. Daubert has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for Ph . D . degree in Agricultural Engineering and Food Science and Human Nutrition 4“» x? £4244, Major professor Date May 16, 1996 MS U is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Institution 0-12771 LIBRARY Michigan State Unlverslty PLACE m RETURN BOX to remove We checkout trom your record. TO AVOID FINES return on or before date due. DATE DUE DATE DUE DATE DUE [i MSU IeAnNfirmettve ActIoNEqueI Opportunlty InetIMIon ELECTRORHEOLOGY OF FLUID FOODS By Christopher R. Daubert A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fitlfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Agricultural Engineering Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition 1996 W ELECTRORHEOLOGY OF FLUID FOODS By Christopher R Daubert Electrorheology is the study of the effects of electric fields on the flow properties of certain fluids. These fluids generally exhibit an increase in apparent viscosity and a greater yield stress over an unelectrified sample. The phenomenon requires an electric field and polar particles suspended in an insulating oil A standard concentric cylinder viscometer, fitted with custom made electrical attachments, was converted into an electrorheometer. This system allowed for control of the applied DC voltage, fluid temperature, and shear rate while observing the resulting effects on the shear stress. Two electrorheological fluids, milk chocolate and suspensions of wheat flour in oil, were the materials examined in this study. An experimental design was applied to the flour and oil systems to test for significant effects and interactions among six important electrorheological variables: voltage, temperature, concentration, flour type, oil type, and moisture content. One of the variables, flour type, had no efl‘ect on the electrorheological response. At constant temperature, the shear stress increases as the voltage increases for all fluid systems studied. Also, shear stresses increase as temperature increases when fluids are subjected to a constant shear rate and voltage. Although this response may have been predicted for flour and oil suspensions, these results were tmexpected for a typical shear-thinning food, milk chocolate. Because a single mechanism explaining the electrorheological phenomenon has yet been identified, dimensional analysis was applied to each electrorheological system in attempts to model the response. Ten dimensionless groups were collected and manipulated to create meaningful terms, like the Mason number - a ratio of polar and viscous forces. Multiple regression was applied to the dimensionless groups, and equations were developed to predict flow behavior for each fluid system The effects of an applied voltage on the thermal conductivity of molten milk chocolate was also studied. An applied electric field of up to 450 V mm'1 at 60 Hz was found to have no significant effect on the heat transfer properties of milk chocolate. The thermal conductivity was found to have an average value ofO. 163 W m1 K'1 over a temperature range varying from 30 to 60 °C. Cepyn'ght by CHRISTOPHER RALPH DAUBERT 1996 W T o my parents Harlan A. and Jeanne B. Daubert for their unconditional love, guidance, and support. T o my grandmother Alice H. Beaver for her infinite wisdom and steadfast faith in my abilities. To my brothers and sisters Suzanne, Nancy, Harlan, Alison, Elizabeth, and Aaron for playing, fighting, laughing, and crying with me. “When you steal from one author, it’s plagiarism; if you steal from many, it’s researc ” Wilson Mizner ( 1876-1933) “There is only one proved method of assisting the advancement of science - that of picking men of genius, backing them heavily, and leaving them to direct themselves.” James Bryant Conant (1893- 1978) W I thank Professor James F. Stefl‘e for his support, guidance, and encouragement throughout this experience. Dr. Steffe has been much more than a mentor. I am proud to call him my fiiend. I extend sincere appreciation to my committee members for their instruction and time dedicated to this project: Dr. K Berghmd (Department of Chemical Engineering), Dr. D. Smith (Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition), Dr. A Srivastava (Department of Agricultural Engineering), and Dr. G. Strasburg (Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition). In addition, special acknowledgement is made for Dr. D. Gilliland (Department of Statistics and Probability) and Dr. J. Lloyd (Department of Mechanical Engineering) for their assistance and advice during data interpretation. I thank Hershey Foods Corporation for materials and technical support. I acknowledge the use of facilities at Michigan State University: Food Engineering and Rheology Laboratory, Engineering Research Complex, Department of Agricultural Engineering, and Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition. A very warm thanks is reserved for my special fiiends fiom Michigan: J. Briggs, D. Campos, W. Chamberlain, J. Chick, R Fick, A Fogiel, M. Montross, S. Morris, J. Nuss, L. Rayas, P. Rettew, G. Salthouse, E. Schluentz, S. Smith, J. Snook, R. Stowell, and A Wedel. Special mention is made for the support and affection from Charles and Betty Downs. Finally, thanks to God. page LIST OF TABLES xi LIST OF FIGURES xii NOMENCLATURE xiv 1. INTRODUCTION 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 5 2.1. ORIGIN ................................................................................................................................. 5 2.2. THEORIES ............................................................................................................................. 8 2.2.1. Polarization Mechanisms .................................................................................... 9 2.2.1.1.Molecular Dipole Alignment and Interaction ..................................... 11 2.2.1.2.Water Glue ........................................................................................ 12 2.2.1.3. Interfacial Polarization (Maxwell-Wagner) ....................................... 14 2.2.2. Point Dipole Approximation (Electrostatic Polarization Model) ......................... 19 2.3. RIIEOLOGY ......................................................................................................................... 23 2.3.1. Yield Stress and Structure Development ............................................................ 27 2.3.2. Viscoelasticity ................................................................................................... 29 2.3.3. Dimensional Analysis ........................................................................................ 34 2.3.3.1.Mason Number (Mn) ......................................................................... 35 2.3.3.2. 11 Number (A) .................................................................................... 40 2.3.3.3.Peclet Number (Pe) ............................................................................ 42 2.3.4. Theoretical Models and Simulations .................................................................. 42 2.3.5. ER Rheometers .................................................................................................. 47 2.4. CHOCOLATE RHEOLOGY ...................................................................................................... 48 2.5. VARIABLES INFLUENCING ER BEHAVIOR ............................................................................. 50 2.5.1. Temperature (T) ................................................................................................ 51 2.5.2. Moisture Content (me) ...................................................................................... 53 2.5.3. Electrical Frequency (f) ..................................................................................... 55 2.5.4. Volume Ratio (ob) ............................................................................................... 57 2.5.5. Dielectric Properties (5) ..................................................................................... 58 2.5.6. Particle Size and Shape ..................................................................................... 60 2.5.7. Electric Field (E) ............................................................................................... 61 2.5.8. Shear Eaten") ................................................................................................ 62 2.5.9. Characteristics of Ideal ER Fluids for Mechanical Devices ................................ 63 2.6. ENGINEERING ER FLUID DEVICES AND APPIJCATIONS ......................................................... I. 64 2.6.1. Valves ............................................................................................................... 68 2.6.2. Clutches ............................................................................................................ 70 2.6.3. Interfacing ........................................................................................................ 70 2.6.4. Patents .............................................................................................................. 72 2.6.5. Miscellaneous Applications ............................................................................... 72 2. 7. THERMAL ENHANCEMENT FROM THE EIEC’I'RORHEOIDGICAL PHENOMENON ......................... 74 3. MATERIALS AND METHODS 77 3.1. EQUIPMENT ........................................................................................................................ 77 3.2. MATERIALS ........................................................................................................................ 80 3.2.1. Milk Chocolate and Cocoa Butter ...................................................................... 81 3.2.2. Wheat Flour ...................................................................................................... 81 3.2.3. Vegetable Oils ...... 82 3.3. PREPARATION OF ER SAMPLES ............................................................................................ 83 3.3.1. Milk Chocolate .................................................................................................. 83 3.3.2. Flour and Oil ..................................................................................................... 84 3 .4. DATA COLLECTION FOR ER FLUIDS ..................................................................................... 84 3.4.1. Shear Rate Ramp ............................................................................................... 85 3.4.2. Voltage Ramp ................................................................................................... 86 3.4.3. Temperature Ramp ............................................................................................ 86 3.5. CALCULATIONS ................................................................................................................... 87 3.5.1. Shear Rate ......................................................................................................... 87 3.5.2. End Effects ........................................................................................................ 87 3.5.3. Casson Model Parameters for Milk Chocolate ................................................... 91 3.6. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS ....................................................................................................... 91 3.6.1 Experimental Design .......................................................................................... 92 3.6.2. Fractional Factorial Design ............................................................................... 96 3.7. DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................... 96 3.7.1. Description Of Physical System .......................................................................... 98 3.7.2. FLTQB System .................................................................................................. 99 ix 4.l 5.5 APPE BIBL‘ 3.7.3. [I Group and Prediction Equation Development ............................................... 100 3.8. THERMALPIIOIERTESOFMHKCHOCOIATENANEIECIMCFED .................................... 101 3.8.1. Heat Transfer Mathematical Model .................................................................. 102 3.8.2. Mirror Image Method (MIM) Plates ................................................................. 104 3.8.3. Overall Apparatus ............................................................................................ 104 3.8.4. MIM Testing Procedure .................................................................................... 106 3.8.5. Data Analysis ................................................................................................... 108 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 109 4.1. EIECTRORHEOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR OF MILK CHOCOLATE .................................................... 109 4.2. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF FLOUR/OIL ............................................................................... 1 18 4. 3. II GROUPS RESULTING FROM DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS ........................................................ 130 4.3.1. Prediction Equations ........................................................................................ 134 4.3.2. Dimensionless Rheograrn ................................................................................. 138 4.3.3. 11 Group Analysis ........................................................................................... 144 4.4. THERMAL ENHANCEMENT OF MILK CHOCOLATE ................................................................. 157 5. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 163 5.1. ELECTRORHEOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR OF MILK CHOCOLATE .................................................... 163 5.2. INVESTIGATION OF VARIABLES INFLUENCING ER BEHAVIOR ................................................ 164 5.3. DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE ER PHENOMENON ............................................................. 165 5.4. THERMAL PROPERTIES OF MILK CHOCOLATE ...................................................................... 166 5.5. FUTURERESEARCH ............................................................................................................ 166 APPENDIX A 169 BIBLIOGRAPHY 179 Table Page 2.1. COMMON ER FLUID COMPOSITIONS. 6 2.2. DIMENSIONLESS TERMS OF ER. 36 2.3. COMMON CHARACTERISTICS OF ER FLUIDS. 52 3.1. END EFFECT DATA GIVING PERCENT TORQUE AT DIFFERENT BOB SPEEDS AND HEIGHTS FOR SILICONE OH. 89 3.2. STATISTICAL LEVELS FOR ER VARIABLES. 93 3.3. PERCENT MOISTURE CONTENT FOR SOFT AND HARD RED FLOUR ACCORDING TO AACC METHOD 44-15A. 95 3.4. 16 STATISTICAL TREATMENTS FOR FLOUR/OIL DATA. 97 4.1. CASSON MODEL PARAMETERS AND APPARENT VISCOSITIES FOR Mn.x CHOCOLATE DATA. ........ 110 4.2. ALIASED SETS FOR A 2“2 FRACTIONAL FACTORIAL DESIGN. 120 4.3. SS VALUES FOR COMPLETE FRACTIONAL DESIGN OF FLOUR/OIL DATA 121 4.4. SS PERCENTAGES FOR DESIGN EFFECTS AND ALIASES OF FLOUR/On. DATA. 122 4.5. OVERALL RANKING OF EFFECTS AND ALIASES OF FLOUR/OIL DATA. 123 4.6. ANOVA TABLE FOR FIVE MAIN EFFECTS AND LOWER ORDER INTERACTIONS OF FLOUR/OIL DATA. 125 4.7. COMPARISON OF ER MATERIAL CONSTANTS FOR MILK CHOCOLATE AND FLOUR/OIL DATA. ..... 148 4.8. THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY (W M" K“) OF MILK CHOCOLATE EXPOSED TO VARYING ELECTRIC FIELDS 160 43. 4.4. ‘ 4.6. l 4.7. I 4.8, I 4.9, I Figure Page 2.1. POLARIZABLE PARTICLE EXPOSED TO SHEAR AND ELECTRIC FIELDS 10 2.2. INTERFACIAL POLARILATION PATHWAYS 16 2.3. PARTICLE POLARIZATION GEOMETRY. 2.4. ELECTRORHEOLOGICAL MICROSTRUCTURES. 22 25 2.5. ER VALVE. 69 2.6. ER CLUTCH. 71 3.1. GENERAL CONFIGURATION FOR ER EXPERIMENTAL EQUIPMENT. 78 3.2. CROSSSECTIONAL SCHEMATTC OF THE ER BOB AND CUP. 79 3.3. END EFFECT DATA OF ER BOB IMMERSED TO VARIOUS HEIGHTS IN SILICONE OIL AT DIFFERENT SPEEDS. 90 3.4. “MIRROR IMAGE” APPARATUS PLATE SERIES FOR DETERMINATION OF HEAT TRANSFER PROPERTIES OF MILK CHOCOLATE 3.5. GENERAL CONFIGURATION FOR MIM EXPERIMENTAL EQUIPNIENT. 4.1. ELECTRORHEOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF AVERAGED MILK CHOCOLATE DATA AT T = 35.0 °C. 4.2. ELECTRORHEOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF AVERAGED MILK CHOCOLATE DATA AT T = 37.8 °C. 4.3. ELECTRORHEOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF AVERAGED MILK CHOCOLATE DATA AT T = 40.6 °C. 4.4. THERMORBEOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF AVERAGED MILK CHOCOLATE DATA AT 300 VOLTS MM". 4.5. MILK CHOCOLATE FLOW BEHAVIOR DEPENDENCE ON TEMPERATURE IN THE PRESENCE OF CONSTANT ELECTRIC FIELD AND SHEAR RATE. 4.6. FIVE-DIMENSIONAL STATISTICAL CUBE SHOWING MAIN VARIABLE AND INTERACTION EFFECTS ON 7] AT 0.08 RPM OF FLOUR/OIL DATA. 4.7. FIVE-DIMENSIONAL STATISTICAL CUBE SHOWING MAIN VARIABLE AND INTERACTION EFFECTS ON 27 AT 2.0 RPM OF FLOUR/OIL DATA 4.8. DIMENSIONLESS PLOT COMPARING ACTUAL AND MODEL VALUES OF 71/71, Vs Mn ' FOR FLOUR/On. DATA. 4.9. DIMENSIONLESS PLOT COMPARING ACTUAL AND MODEL VALUES or 17/17. VS Mn ' FOR MILK CHOCOLATE DATA. 105 107 111 113 114 115 116 128 129 136 139 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.10. DIMENSIONLESS SHEAR STRESS Vs DIMENSIONLESS SHEAR RATE AT DIFFERENT FLOUR/OIL VOLUME RATIOS. 140 4.11. DIMENSIONLESS SHEAR STRESS Vs DIMENSIONLESS SHEAR RATE AT DIFFERENT FLOUR/OIL TEMPERATURES. 141 4.12. DIMENSIONLESS SHEAR STRESS Vs DIMENSIONLESS SHEAR RATE AT DIFFERENT FLOUR/OIL MOISTURE CONTENTS. 142 4.13. DIMENSIONLESS PLOT SHOWING BEST FIT LINE OF 17/1), Vs Mn' FOR FLOUR/OIL DATA. .......... 145 4.14. DIMENSIONLESS PLOT OF 17/17, Vs Mn ’ FOR MILK CHOCOLATE DATA IN COMPARISON WITH THE BEST FIT LINE FROM FLOUR/OIL DATA. 146 4.15. DIMENSIONLESS PLOT SHOWING BEST FIT LINE OF ”/0. Vs Pe' FOR FLOUR/OIL DATA. ........... 150 4.16. DIMENSIONLESS PLOT OF q/n, VS Pe' FOR MILK CHOCOLATE DATA IN COMPARISON WITH THE BEST FIT LINE FROM FLOUR/OIL DATA. 151 4.17. DIMENSIONLESS PLOT SHOWING BEST FIT LINE OF 17/17, Vs Re’ FOR FLOUR/OIL DATA. ........... 152 4.18. DIMENSIONLESS PLOT OF rI/q, Vs Re' FOR MILK CHOCOLATE DATA IN COMPARISON WITH THE BEST FIT LINE FROM FLOUR/OIL DATA. 154 4.19. DIMENSIONLESS PLOT SHOWING BEST FIT LINE OF Re' Vs Pe' FOR FLOUR/OIL DATA. ........... 155 4.20. DIMENSIONLESS PLOT OF Re' Vs Pe' FOR MILK CHOCOLATE DATA IN COMPARISON WITH THE BEST FIT LINE FROM FLOUR/On. DATA. 156 4.21. TRANSIENT BOUNDARY TEMPERATURES OF MILK CHOCOLATE: COMPARISON OF ACTUAL AND THEORETICAL TEMPERATURES 158 4.22. MILK CHOCOLATE BOUNDARY TEMPERATURE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ACTUAL AND THEORETICAL VALUES 159 GO 0: In 2% K K1 k .11 area, m2 Hamaker constant (kBT), J proportionality constant proportionality constant proportionality constant specific heat, J kg'l K'l dipole moment, C m electric field intensity, v m-1 unit vector in r direction unit vector in 0 direction electric frequency, Hz polarization force, N complex modulus, Pa shear storage modulus, Pa shear loss modulus, Pa gravitational acceleration, 9.81 m s'2 bob height, m effective bob height, m ER material constant, dimensionless consistency coefficient, Pa sn thermal conductivity, W m’1 K’1 Boltzmann constant, 1.381 x 10'23 J K'1 chocolate layer thickness, In torque, N m D. As. double layer thickness, m permittivity, CZN”l rn'2 dielectric constant of continuum, dimensionless dielectric constant of particle, dimensionless permittivity ofa material in vacuum, 8.854 x 10'12 CZN'l m"2 dielectric constant of suspension, dimensionless complex permittivity, C2 N' m'2 relative permittivity, CZN'1m'2 dielectric loss, C2 N‘1 111'2 volume fraction, dimensionless shear rate, 5.1 shear rate at the bob, s'l apparent viscosity, Pa 5 apparent viscosity of continuum, Pa 5 plastic viscosity, Pa 5 apparent viscosity of suspension at infinite shear rate, Pa 5 it number, dimesionless Modified 7. number, dimesionless dimensionless group modified dimensionless group density of suspension, g cm'3 density of continuum, g cm'3 density of particles, g cm'3 Shear stress, Pa shear stress at the bob, Pa yield stress, Pa angle between the line of centers of two adjacent particles and the electric field vector, deg. angular velocity, rad s'l ‘I‘ electric potential, V SUE H162 SIN qua] elecl an e] fluid: ER e Word fluidil fiEld p Shear I W Rheology is the science of deformation and flow of matter (Stefl‘e, 1992). Rheology is important to food science because it characterizes how materials respond to stresses and strains applied during processing. Common properties determined during fluid rheological measurements include viscosity and yield stress. Viscosity is a term that reflects the tendency for a fluid to resist flow. The yield stress is a value corresponding to a minimum stress required to initiate flow. Rheological measurements are useful for determining quality, processing, and handling of food materials (Boume, 1982). Electrorheology (ER), a discipline of rheology, is concerned With the efl‘ects of electric fields on the flow properties of specific liquid suspensions that, upon application of an electric field, show an increase in apparent viscosity and a greater yield stress. These fluids require polarizable particles suspended in an insulating (non-conducting) oil. The ER efi'ects result from formation of microstructures of the dispersed solid phase. In other words, the field-induced microstructures attempt to span the fluid gap and cause reduced ER suspensions generally respond as shear-thinning fluids regardless of an electric field presence (Jordan and Shaw, 1989). That is, the apparent Viscosity diminishes as the shear rate increases. Further investigation reveals that the major forces responsible for ER mil chai coin €pr Nun 111111 the 1 ER] with" mec'. med inter C0111 WI: “101: 2 activity are polar, viscous, inertial, and hydrodynamic in nature. The field induced particle chains are sensitive to shearing, and ER activity diminishes with high shear rates, coinciding with viscous forces dominating polar forces. A dimensionless group devoted to expressing the relationship between viscous and polar forces is known as the Mason Number (Marshall et al., 1989). This term and others exist to describe competitive effects in the ER phenomenon. According to Block and Kelly (1988), there is little agreement about what induces the ER phenomenon, and much experimentation needs to be pursued to research the many ER parameters. Quoting Zukoski (1993 ), “Characterization of ER fluids requires an understanding of the colloidal and rheological properties of suspensions, polarization mechanisms in weakly conducting solids and liquids, and electrochemistry ill nonpolar media. In addition, linking microstructures to flow properties involves study of the interplay of viscous, thermal, and polarization forces as well as the strength of adhesion of conducting particles held at small separations in a large field.” Among the numerous variables known to impact ER activity are: volume fraction, temperature, voltage, moisture content, dispersed and dispersant phases, electrical properties, and shear rate. Electrorheological literature abounds with proposed ER devices, including shock absorbers, engine dampers, and variable speed drives. Presently, there exists strong efforts in the automotive industry to design ideal ER fluids for specific applications (Duclos et al. 1988; Hartsock et aL, 1991; Korane, 1991; Morishita and Mitsui, 1992; Stanway et al., 1992). evolve andpr ERflu ekcui respo possil chocr prep. capa‘ linkil (EHO. dire: tTans ER: r1160. min. prim 3 1992). With the development of more ideal ER fluids, ER applications and devices could evolve into an annual multi-billion dollar industry (Jordan and Shaw, 1989). For the food industry, ER technology may offer new potential in process design and product development of foods responding to an applied electric field. Unlike designed ER fluids for mechanical applications, fluid foods are not prepared to respond to an electric field. However, certain materials of biological origin, such as milk chocolate, respond naturally to an applied voltage. Through application of this technology, it may be possible for the confectionery industry to externally control the flow properties of milk chocolate by using a simple ER valve with no moveable parts. ER materials have not only been studied for the ability to change rheological properties, but reports have surfaced of ER fluids being able to improve heat transfer capabilities (Zhang and Lloyd, 1993 ). The ER microstructures are believed to be particles linking together and forming chains, which in turn orient parallel to the electric field (Block et a1, 1990; Halsey, 1992). It is the microstructures that potentially increase the directional thermal conductivity of ER materials, providing a particle pathway for heat transfer. The objectives for this dissertation cover four general aspects of the behavior of ER food systems: 1) To evaluate the literature in electrorheology and milk chocolate rheology; and to study the efl‘ects of shear fields and temperature on the flow behavior of milk chocolate in the presence of an electric field. 2) To investigate the importance of six primary ER variables and their interactions with each other by studying model ER fluids molI mlh 4 composed of different suspensions of wheat flour and vegetable Oil. 3) To employ dimensional analysis to develop prediction equations for describing the ER phenomenon, linking interactions between electrical, thermal, Viscous, and hydrodynamic forces in food systems. 4) To describe the ‘Mirror-Image-Method” for measuring thermal properties of molten milk chocolate; and to evaluate the thermal conductivity of molten milk chocolate with and Without electric field effects. C011 pol: fluj aut the of 2. “‘3 E1. W An electrorheological fluid consists of a polarizable, particulate phase dispersed in a continuous, insulating medium In the presence of an electric field, the solid phase polarizes and initiates structures attempting to span the electrode gap. The induced structures result in increases in the fluid viscosity and yield stress. The potential of ER fluids for flow control has been studied extensively, especially in respect to their use in automotive mechanisms. However, the literature does not indicate any previous studies of the potential for applying the ER phenomena to food processing techniques. Applications of ER technology to the food industry may introduce new techniques for process design and product development. Table 2.1 lists components, solids, liquids, and additives comprising a variety of ER fluids. Numerous review articles have been written addressing in great detail the ER phenomenon: Stangroom (1983), Deinega and Vinogradov (1984), Block and Kelly (1988), Gast and Zukoski (1989), Jordan and Shaw (1989), Bares and Carlson (1989), Pool (1990), Block et al. (1990), Halsey (1992), and Zukoski (1993 ). 2.1. Origin The fibrillation of particles ill a fluid liquid suspension induced by an electric field was first annormced by Willis M. Winslow in 1947. The Winslow Efl‘ect or Electrorheology (ER) was accidentally Observed by Winslow while he was experimenting Ca. 6 TABLE 2.1. (Block and Kelly, 1988) COMMON ER FLUID CODIPOSITIONS. Particulate Phase Continuum Additive Alginic Acid Polychlorinated biphenyls, Water poly(tri-flurovinyl chloride), 0- dichlorobenzene, p- chlorotoluene, xylene, plus mixtures of above Carboxymethyl dextran Polychlorinated biphenyls, Water and sorbitan mono- poly(tri-flurovinyl chloride), 0- oleate or sorbitan mono- dichlorobenzene, p- sesquioleate chlorotoluene, xylene, plus mixtures of above Cellulose Chlorinated insulator oil Water Liquid paraffin or hydraulic oil Aqueous ammonium or dibutyl sebacate or oleic acid chloride and other or chlorotoluene or silicone oil electrolytes Gelatine Transformer oil or olive oil or mineral oil Gypsum Transformer Oil or olive oil or mineral oil Poly(vinyl alcohol) Hydrocarbons Water Starch (flour) Petroleum spirit or transformer Water and sorbitan oleate Oil or laureate Mineral or transformer oil or olive oil Hydrocarbons Water Vaseline Oil Water with ‘ bod}: (JohI desig serve bras: torsi “he elect to th attra obse cred Fibn' Wills 7 with the Johnsen-Rahbeck efiea. The Johnsen-Rahbeck efl‘ect may occur when two bodies in contact with a voltage potential between them experience considerable adhesion (Johnsen and Rahbek, 1923). Winslow, an electrical engineer, used this technology to design a photoelectric switch. To accomplish this task, he constructed a special clutch to serve as a relay. This clutch consisted of a semi-conductive electrode rigidly held in a brass cup by a shaft connected to a motor. The opposing electrode was suspended by a torsion wire. The gap between the electrodes was filled with a powdered dielectric. When a voltage was applied, attractive forces between the moving and suspended electrode caused the latter electrode to rotate with the motored electrode. Oil was added to the mechanism for lubrication. When an electric field was applied, the Oil enhanced the attractive forces of the powder (Winslow, 1989). This was the earliest recorded observance of the electrorheological phenomenon. In his introductory ER publication, Winslow discussed many pertinent topics, including applications and theories, as well as the role played by surfactants and water. He credited voltage induced fibrillation as the mechanism responsible for the effect. Fibrillation is the creation of particle chains, or fibril-like Structures, across the fluid gap. Winslow also described an increase in bulk viscosity measured by a rotational electro- viscometer. Later, Winslow established a company dedicated to researching ER fluids and applications; he would go on to patent and demonstrate many ER devices (Winslow, 1949; Zukoski, 1993 ). However, lack of practical applications of this technology caused a drought of ER research until the late 19605 (Stangroom, 1983). Within the past ten years, ER has received renewed attention due to the rapid response time Of the fluids to an clean potell 1990; deslgi .Q I .9 o no 511 1988 also I flow _ 8 electric field. Applications, such as shock absorbers and high speed robotics, could potentially take advantage of the processing speed of present day microcomputers (Pool, 1990). A fluid which may easily be converted between a fluid and a solid may lead to design improvements in many mechanical devices. 2.2. Theories There have been numerous attempts to explain the ER response; however, there is no single quantifying theory agreed upon by all that explains the effect (Block and Kelly, 1988; Jordan et al., 1988; Jaggi et aL, 1989; Pool, 1990; Block et al., 1990). BR fluids, also referred to as smart fluids, present a complex physical Situation involving electric and flow fields within a concentrated particulate suspension, complicating the development of models and theories (Block and Kelly, 1988). However, there is general agreement that: 1) ER fluids consist of micron-sized polarizable particulates suspended in an insulating medium; and 2) coulombic interactions existing between polarized particles lead to aggregation and clusters acting as entities within the flow field, but may not extend through the bulk. It is generally accepted that the primary step for the ER response involves polarization of the solid phase invoked by an electric field, leading to the formation of microstructures within the continuum The initial polarization is followed by particle- particle interaction, resulting in the ER phenomenon (Block and Kelly, 1988). The polarization concept explains many features associated with ER fluids (Stangroom, 1983; Zukoski, 1993). 771 actixit randor throug partich interac and rec referrer 10131101 Particle Change pr OdUCe interacu' field im- flujd mic (Block E bipolar A 2.2.1. Polarization Mechanisms Most theories associate electrostatic forces between particles with the origin of ER activity, and are attributable to polarization alone. All ER fluids are composed of randomly dispersed particles, polarized by an electric field. Polarization may be achieved through two mechanisms, classified as interfacial or dipolar (Block et a1, 1990). Once particle polarization is established, fibrillated structures follow from coulombic interactions between particles. In shear flow, these structures are continuously destroyed and recreated (Deinega and Vinogradov, 1984; Gast and Zukoski, 1989). Polarization is influenced by the spinning of the particles in a shear field, commonly referred to as flow modified permittivity (FMP). In rotational viscometry of ER fluids, rotation and polarization of the particles occur simultaneously. Figure 2.1 shows a typical particle exposed to shear and electric fields. Too fast a spin, and the field direction may change too rapidly for effective polarization. At lower shear rates, the slower field produces an enhancement of particle polarization. At large shear rates, the polar interactions weaken and the ER structures deplete. However, fast polarization ill a shear field involves a continuing tendency for ER structures to rearrange. Little permanence of fluid microstructures exists under such circumstances (Block et al., 1990). Presently, there is no evidence that ER involves a singular form of polarization (Block et a1, 1990). Interfacial polarization involves the migration and movement of charges and charge carriers about a partially or totally charged boundary. Molecular Dipolar Alignment supports the rotation of dipoles, but not the migration of charges 10 FIG. 2.1. POLARIZABLE PARTICLE EXPOSED TO SHEAR AND ELECTRIC FIELDS. .4 he PE M de 3p] i1111 1 1 (Block et a1, 1990). Three main theories of electrorheology have received much attention and support, they include: 1) Molecular Dipolar Alignment and Interaction, 2) Interfacial Polarization, and 3) Water Glue. The following sections explore these three polarization mechanisms. Other works addressing the role of polarization include: Usyarov et al. (1965), Bezruk et a1 (1972; 1972b). 2.2.1.1.Molecular Dipole Alignment and Interaction When Winslow first observed electrorheology, he attributed the special response to particle polarization and fibrillation (Block and Kelly, 1988; Jordan and Shaw, 1989). According to this theory, it is the strength of the interacting dipolar particles (the bridges) which determines the magnitude of the ER response (Jordan and Shaw, 1989; Zukoski, 1993) Dipolar polarization involves dipole rotation, not the dlifi of mobile charges. Molecular polarization is based upon the concept that, due to a dielectric mismatch between phases, particles polarize in an electric field and apply forces to surrounding particles (Gamayunov and Murtsovkin, 1982; Jordan and Shaw, 1989; Zukoski, 1993). Most molecules carry no net charge, but many do possess a dipole. Dipolar molecules depend upon their environments and can change when transferred fiom one medium to another (Gamayunov and Murtsovkin, I982; Israelachvili, 1992). In the case ofER, the applied electric field induces the dipole and ultimately leads to polarization and interactions. Dipole moment interactions in molecules induced by an electric field is a unique electrostatic interaction known as molecular polarization (Israelachvili, 1992). IN) : . IIlU not is. l the P101 198 10115 . IHole the f( 1 2 It has since been reported by Hill and Steenkiste (1991) that the ER phenomenon occurs in the millisecond time fiame. A major criticism of dipole alignment and fibrillation is that the response occurs too rapidly for extensive particle interaction and microstructure formation which develops when an ER fluid is ill the presence of an electric field. (Block and Kelly, 1988; Jordan and Shaw, 1989). 2.2.1.2.Water Glue According to Stangroom (1983 ), certain requirements must exist for a fluid to Show ER activity: 1) The base liquid must be hydrophobic; and 2) The particulate phase must be hydrophilic and porous, allowing the solids to absorb water. These criteria serve as the basis for the Water Ghle Theory, which incorporates the notion that water absorbed by a solid particle is essential to elicit the ER response. That is, the amount of water greatly influences the performance of the final fluid. Other theories assume that the effect results from polarization alone; water and other additives provide a mode for inducing charge mobility and interfacial polarization (Block and Kelly, 1988) According to the Water Glue Theory, mobile ions exist in pores of the solid phase, and these ions associate with water molecules. When an electric field is applied, mobile ions move toward the oppositely charged polar end of the solid particle carrying the water molecules. This action results in an uneven distribution of water ill the particle, leading to the formation of "water bridges" between particles. Once the voltage is removed from the 1e 1 3 fluid, the water retreats into the pores of the solid, and the dipole is lost (Stangroom, 1983) Uejirna (1972) showed results suggesting the adsorbed water essentially afl‘ects particle surface charge density and the electric double layers, ultimately increasing the solid phase dielectric constant. The Winslow efi’ect was enhanced with water adsorption and was saturated at a constant amount. The adsorbed water was considered to be one of two types: (1) adsorbed to the particle surface forming double layers, and (2) absorbed within the particle. At lower amounts Of moisture, when the ER system was comprised of the second type of water absorption, no electric double layers formed and no ER activity occurred, indicating a requirement for water by the system for invoking an ER response. Xu and Liang (1991) measured the rheological properties of a semiconducting polymer-based ER suspension in transient, steady, and oscillatory flows. In these suspensions, water was not necessary for polarization; although water still improved ER performance. Considering the polarization mechanisms (interfacial or dipolar), it appeared the overall degree of polarization afleaed ER fluid performance. At higher temperatures, the anhydrous ER material had improved performances over water activated dispersions. These results support the pursuit and development of dry ER fluids. Kuramoto et a1 (1995) studied a suspension ofpolyanaline-coated copolystyrene particles in silicone OiL This mixture was found to have a greater ER ability at higher temperatures without the requirement of water when compared to other ER fluids. ER 1 4 data were nearly identical at 25 and 150 °C indicating ER activity Without water since the physically absorbed water would desorb at higher temperatures. The Water Glue Theory implies water is a necessity for the ER response. However, recent development of anhydrous ER fluids clearly dictates that water-bridging is not necessary. As an alternative mechanism, interfacial polarization may be a potential candidate to explain the response in aqueous systems, and in particular, those systems incorporating surfactants (Block and Kelly, 1988). 2.2.1.3. Interfacial Polarization (Maxwell-Wagner) Interfacial polarization involves ionic migration through particle pores or along a particle surface, as well as within the double layer. ER suspensions generally contain sources for charge carriers, such as electrons, ions, or pores (Block and Kelly, 1988). According to Block and Kelly (1988), ER fluids are based upon some type of charge migration rather than dipolar orientation. The precise mechanisms for charge migration may vary fi'om system to system There are various pathways that charge carriers may follow: 1) bulk transport through the particle; 2) surface migration of carriers; and 3) movement of charges ill a particle’s double layer (Block and Kelly, 1988; Block et al., 1990) When a potential is applied across the ER system without the passage of current, the potential drop cannot exist in the electrodes or the dispersant, it must occur at the interface according to Newman (1991) and Jordan and Shaw (1989). In other words, with application of an electric field, free and bound charges accumulate at the interface h 1 5 (Deinega and Vinogradov, 1984). Figure 2.2 depicts three potential interfacial polarization pathways. Double Layer. Double layer polarization is an example of numerous charge migratory theories involving interfacial regions. It involves charges residing within the oil region surrounding the solid phase, and is a likely source for the ER response particularly when surfactants are present. Whenever surface reducing agents are in the ER solution, the presence of a charged double layer is possible. In colloidal systems, interfaces between solids and liquids almost always acquire charges that may disturb the random distribution of charges in solution. In general, one phase tends to achieve a positive and the other phase a negative charge. For example, in the presence of an electric field, a positively charged particle will be surrounded by negatively charged counter ions, culminating in a few negative ions bound tightly to the particle surface. This monolayer of charges is called the compact layer. Concentration of remaining charges falls ofl‘ gradually from the particle until the bulk concentration of charges is attained. The outer region of freely moving ions, influenced by electrical and thermal forces, is known as the diffuse layer. The total charged arrangement is commonly referred to as the diffuse electrical double layer (Hunter, 1989; Jordan and Shaw, 1989; Russel et a1, 1989;1sraelchivili, 1992). Application of an electric field causes movement of the double layer toward the electrode having an opposite charge (Jordan and Shaw, 1939; Uejima, 1972). 1 7 The thickness of the electrical double layer is much less than the particle size (Dukhin and Shilov, 1974). When two interfaces approach one another so that the double layers overlap, the resulting force is usually repulsive (Hunter, 1989). However, with the addition of an electric field, the charge on a particle and that in the diffuse layer have different signs, and the charge cloud and the particle tend to move in opposing direction (Russel et al., 1989). Double layer processes involve the charges extending into the liquid phase of the interface. According to Newman (1991) and Russel et aL (1989), a double layer is present at an interface because: 1) some materials in solution sinme prefer positioning near the solid; 2) application of an electric field causes a potential drop at the solid-liquid interface; 3) ionization of surface moieties; and 4) entrapment of ions. Proponents Of the double layer theory believe that the electric field causes movement and distortion of the diffuse double layer toward the oppositely charged electrode. The problem with this theory is that double layer interactions and overlap may not be strong enough to support the development of a yield stress (Jordan and Shaw, 1989). A classical paper in ER by Klass and Martinek (1967) explained the primary ER mechanism by induced interfacial polarization on and near the solid surface, resulting in polarization of the electrical double layer. Electric field application, they contended, caused a movement of the particle double layer towards the oppositely charged electrode. Overlap of the double layers enhanced electrostatic interactions between particles, causing 1 8 ER structure formation. They reasoned that mass movement of particles through a continuum would not be expected to follow an AC field; however, induced double layer polarization would follow the alternating field since highly mobile charges are involved. In this work, the ER behavior was found to be inversely proportional to the square of the distance separating double layers. In addition, the viscosity of an electrified ER sample was approximately proportional to the reciprocal of the shear rate and the square of the field strength for a particular volume fraction. Similar rheological results were obtained for 60 HZ AC and DC electric fields; yet, the ER efl‘ect decreased with electric frequency of the field at constant voltage. The induced polarization of the double layer was found to be more pronounced at higher temperatures. This work led Klass and Martinek (1967b) to examine electrical properties involved with the double layer polarization mechanism They theorized that shear stresses in the transverse direction of the applied electric field, such as those for couette measurements, perturb the induced structure formation. In the presence of electrical and shear fields, a dynamic equilibrium is achieved between the rheological and electrical properties of the fluid. Application of an AC field generates low-frequency interfacial polarization between components in any system when the phases have difl‘erent dielectric properties and conductivities. Higher temperatures, that do not cause destruction of the double layer, enhance polarization due to a decrease in viscosity of the insulating continuum and increased charge mobility. As concentration of the dispersed phase is increased, distance between electric double layers shortens. In the presence of an electric 1 9 field, the polarized double layers are closer together, perhaps even overlapping, resulting in a larger ER response. In summation, in any system with an interface, a distribution of ions surround the solid, dispersed phase in an attempt to gain stabilization. This distribution is represented as an electrical double layer comprised of: 1) a monolayer, 1 ion thick, closely adhered to the solid surface; and 2) a diflirse layer of ions extending into the continuum (Jordan and Shaw, 1989). Bulk Transport. In many types of particulate dispersions within an insulating continuum, the possibility exists that the particles themselves serve as the charge carriers. In this case, charges residing within the particle are induced to migrate towards the oppositely charged polar end of the particle (Block and Kelly, 1988). Surface Migration. Charges existing on the particle surface are influenced by an electric field to drift along the surface toward the oppositely charged polar end of the solid. 2.2.2. Point Dipole Approximation (Electrostatic Polarization Model) Electrostatic Polarization Models of the ER response are based on the concept that dielectric constant mismatch between ER system phases (5,, at 3,) causes the solid phase to polarize upon exposure to an electric field and apply a force to surrounding particles. Many electrostatic polarization models consider the ER fluid as hard, dielectric spheres suspended in a viscous, dielectric continuum, which is usually low in polarity and conductivity (Adriani and Gast, 1988; Klingenberg et al., 1989; Gast and Zukoski, I989; 20 Zukoski, 1993). The spheres are treated with a “point-dipole” approximation - each sphere interacts with a neighboring sphere and is replaced with a dipole at the center (Klingenberg et al., 199 lb). The electric field polarizes the particles and leads to induced charge at the particle surface. The charged particle may be modeled as a dipole moment, d: d = ,6 r: E [ 2.1] with rp as the particle radius and E is the electric field intensity. ,6 is the particle dipole coeflicient, representing the ability for a particle suspended in a dielectric continuum to polarize ill the presence of an electric field. The dipole moment is enhanced by a large difference in dielectric constants, reflected by new values for ,B (Adriani and Gast, 1988). fl" P ° [2-2] 6,, and 6. represent dielectric constants for the particulate and continuum phases, respectively. The energy, u, between 2 polarized point-dipoles is d2 u(r,t9) = —,—(3cos2 6 — l) [2.3] r where r is the distance between particles and 0is the angle between the electric field vector and the alignment of particle centers (Halsey, 1992). 21 Zukoski ( 1993) provides a detailed explanation of the electrostatic polarization model and reviews simulations where this model serves as the foundation. When two solid spheres, denoted as i and j, with radii rP are at a distance rij apart, and their lines of center are at an angle 6;,- fi'om the electric field, E, each particle feels a force from the polarization of the other sphere. Figure 2.3 shows the geometrical configuration for polarization of a two-sphere system Equation 2.3 (the electrostatic energy) is differentiated and manipulated to obtain the polarization force (Fp) between two spheres: Fp(r ij’ “2‘“ 2611 '20 24 oij)x808crp fl E {(I) [(3005 ij— )8; +8111 ijegl} [ . ] '1 where e' and e, are unit vectors pointing in the r and 9 directions of the cylindrical coordinate system (Zukoski, 1993 ). Equation 2.4 indicates that FF) is attractive when the sphere centers are aligned with the applied field. In contrast, Fp is repulsive when the lines of centers are perpendicular to the electric field (Zukoski, 1993; Halsey, I992). Electrostatic polarization interactions between particle pairs provides the angular dependence associated with the ER columns (Klingenberg et al., 1991c). The electrostatic polarization models can account for much of the ER response. However, it does not account for the effects caused by adding surfactants or water and the efieas of electrical frequency. Incorporating these factors, a Maxwell-Wagner model may ”G- 2.3. FIG. 2.3. PARTICLE POLARIZATION GEOMETRY. way—cu 23 serve as the initial source for simulation development, since it involves the presence of free charge carriers about the solid phase (Zukoski, 1993 ). 2.3. Rheology In the absence of an electric field, the rheological behavior of an ER suspension is similar to the flow behavior of any typical colloidal suspension (Marshall et al., 1989; Zukoski, 1993). In the presence of an electric field, E, the increase in suspension viscosity is rapid and reversible, typically occurring within 1 millisecond (Stangroom, 1983; Block and Kelly, 1988; Klingenberg and Zukoski, 1990). BR fluids tend to be shear-thinning; the apparent viscosity, 7], decreases as the shear rate, 7 , is increased (Jordan and Shaw, 1989; Otsubo et al., 1992). This behavior explains why ER suspensions usually have a greatly enhanced viscosity at low shear rates. In addition, ER fluids exhibit a field induced increase in shear stress, a, usually leading to a yield stress, 00 (Block and Kelly, 1988; Block et aL, 1990). With an electric field, an ER fluid displays characteristics of a Bingham plastic with the yield stress proportional to the square of the field, and has been modeled as such (Uejima, 1972; Block and Kelly, 1988;1(raynik, 1989; Block et a1, 1990; Halsey, 1992; Conrad, 1993): O- : 00 + npl).I [2'5] where 1],. refers to the plastic Viscosity. The unique rheological response of ER fluids is directly related to microstructures that form along lines parallel to an electric field. The ability of ER bridges to withstand 24 certain applied stresses supports the yield Stress notion, validating the application of the Bingham model to describe ER properties (Jordan and Shaw, 1989). By definition, the yield stress is a minimum force required to initiate flow. Below the yield stress, the ER suspension is solid-like. Figure 2.4 shows the electric field induced structure formation across the gap. When a shear stress is applied, the ER structure causes opposition to fluid flow. In Klingenberg et al (1991b), the Casson constitutive equation was found to best represent the ER data: [a(r'.1~:,¢)]yz = [00(E,¢)]% +[n..(¢)7']% [2.6] This relationship showed improved performance over a Bingham relationship since it considered shear rate, volume fraction (¢), and electric field intensity (B). When an ER fluid is subjected to shear and electrical fields, an equih'brium must be established between rheological and electrical properties to establish stability within the fluid (Klass and Martinek, 1967b). Gamayunov and Murtsovkin (1982) observed that when charged particles move through a dielectric continuum driven by an electric field, the particles interact via polar and hydrodynamic forces. The polar interactions result from induced dipole moments in the particles. The hydrodynamic interactions are caused by particle motion through the liquid continuum, adding additional forces on the particle. According to Gamayunov and Murtsovkin (1982), ER structure prediction must consider A) 3) FIG. 2.4. ELECTRORHEOLOGICAL MICROSTRUCTURES. A) PARTICLES IN SUSPENSION WITHOUT A VOLTAGE; B) PARTICLE CHAININ G WITH A VOLTAGE. 26 hydrodynamic interaction and interparticle polarization of the suspended solids ill shear and electric fields. With traditional parallel plate rheology, two plates are separated by a finite distance with the sample fluid filling the space between the plates. One plate is set ill motion relative to the opposing plate, placing a shear stress across the fluid. This force, at a particular angular velocity is measured and related to fluid viscosity. For ER measurement, the plates are two parallel electrodes separated by a gap filled with an ER fluid. One electrode plate is stationary while the other is set in motion producing a shear field (Jordan and Shaw, 1989; Halsey, 1992). It may be necessary to overcome a yield stress for the plates to move at low angular velocities. Results from Conrad (1993) estimated a maximum attainable shear strength in ER fluids to be in the order of 49 kPa. Yang (1993) studied ER fluids comprised of a porous solid aluminosilicate fine particulate as the dispersed phase. Results from this Study found maximum shear strengths of 58 kPa when exposed to 2 MV In1 and a current density of 210 mA m'z. This same fluid demonstrated a rapid loss of ER activity under very high shear rates. Arp and Mason (1977) studied the simple shear behavior of electrically induced linear chains of monodispersed spheres suspended ill a Newtonian dielectric fluid in uniform electric fields. At low shear rates the chains rotated as single axisymmetric particles; while at larger shear rates, the chains collapsed into smaller fragments. When exposed to electric and shear fields, the chains responded as either rigid or flexible 27 particles depending on the interparticle gaps. Particle spacing strongly influenced the orientation of the ER structures when exposed to electric and shear fields. Particle behavior ill Shear and electric fields has been further discussed by Chafl‘ey and Mason (1965), Chafi‘ey and Mason (1968), Okagawa et al. (1974), Okagawa and Mason (1974), Arp and Mason (1977b), Seed et a1 (1989), Ceccio and Wineman (1993), and Filisko and Gamota (1993 ). 2.3.1. Yield Stress and Structure Development When the shear stress is less than the field induced yield stress, the ER materials become solid-like. When the shear stress is equal to or greater than the yield stress, flow is initiated. According to Jordan and Shaw (1989), the simple presence of a yield Stress in an ER suspension indicates the presence of structure development. A threshold voltage may be necessary to invoke ER activity, since a certain amount of polarization may be necessary to overcome the forces separating the particles. Once the threshold voltage is attained, the yield stress often increases in proportion to the square of the applied electric field (Jordan and Shaw, 1989). According to Block et al. (1990), the yield stress is not always a function of the square of the electric field. Otsubo et al. (l992b) agrees that, for an ER fluid composed of silica suspensions in silicone oil, the yield stress scales with the square of the applied field for a volume ratio less than 0.3. However, with greater volume ratios the yield stress varies with (¢E)2-4. 28 At a given electric field strength and temperature, the yield stress increases with the volume fraction of the solid phase. The length of the particle bridges is a function of the electric field strength and the particle concentrations (Usyarov et al., 1965). With more suspended solids, the greater the potential for significant structure development. The greater the integrity of ER structures, the greater the yield stress. Not all ER fluids demonstrate a common response and stability with time, field, and shear rate, but all fluids do exhibit the microstructures commonly alfiliated with ER (Jordan et al., 1992). An understanding of field induced microstructures can allow one to investigate rheological properties giving ER fluids their practicality (Halsey, 1992). On applying the electric field, accompanying increases ill stress result from large changes in the suspension, where randomly dispersed particles move to form cohlmns bridging the electrode gap. Applying a shear field to an ER suspension degrades the structures, and the additional work required to overcome the induced interactions is observed as an increase ill apparent viscosity (Klingenberg et al., 1991c). Other investigations have examined ER structure development (Jordan and Shaw, 1989b). Tao and Sun (1991 and 1991b) descn'be the 3 dimensional form of an ER structure. The ground state of induced columns is proposed to be a body-centered tetragonal lattice. Vorobeva et al. (1969) conducted a study of the change in time of the ER structure size with the application of an AC field. The rate of structure formation increased with concentration of the solid phase, and slightly decreased with increases to AC frequency. Jordan et al. (1988) performed an investigation using turbidity measurements to monitor the rate microstructure development in ER fluids undergoing 29 steady Shear. More turbid suspensions were found to have a lesser degree of particle chaining. 2.3.2. Viscoelasticity Progress has occurred in understanding the ER phenomenon under steady shear conditions. Knowledge of the response is poor under dynamic or oscillatory conditions (Klingenberg, 1993). Experimental investigation of the oscillatory response of ER has produced various results. General conclusions agree that the storage modulus (G') increases with electric field intensity, indicating a Stronger elastic component. Increasing the solid phase concentration with a constant electric field strengthens the ER response, evidenced by an increase in the storage modulus (Jordan and Shaw, 1989). Under periodic deformation, ER fluid elasticity diminished as the amplitude of deformation increased (Korobko and Shulman, 1989). When a sinusoidal Strain is placed upon an elastic material, the resulting stress is in phase with the applied strain. Should a similar strain be put on a purely viscous materiaL the resulting stress is 90° out of phase with the oscillatory strain. A Viscoelastic material produces a stress with components in and out-of phase with the loading. A complex dynamic modulus, 6', considers both stress phases (Stefl‘e, 1992). In the linear Viscoelastic region, the complex modulus is independent of oscillatory frequency, and at high electric fields, the storage modulus achieves a plateau value (Zukoski, 1993 ). The complex modulus is defined as: G‘ = 0' +10" [2.7] 30 where G' and G" represent the storage (in phase) and loss (out of phase) moduli, respectively. Measurements of the complex dynamic modulus generally use sinusoidal, oscillatory flow (Jordan and Shaw, 1989). As solid concentration of an ER fluid increases, G ' and G" are likely to diverge as the electric field increases. In other words, the elastic contribution to the Viscoelastic response becomes more important with higher fields (Jordan et al., 1992). Viscoelastic measurements have shown that the shear rate dependence of the viscous and elastic properties vary with electric field strength (Thurston and Gaertner, 1991). When the electric field is removed, the ER structures weaken and are quickly destroyed, even at small strain amplitudes (Korobko et a1, 1994). Klingenberg expanded an earlier model based on the point-dipole approximation, to study a dynamic, oscillatory shear response for ER fluids (Klingenberg, 1993). Most experimental oscillatory data showed a broad dispersion with storage and loss moduli reported to be insensitive to a large, oscillatory frequency range. Common attributes of an ER fluid may be responsible for a broad dispersion of oscillatory data and must be considered to improve mathematical models. These attributes include particle size and shape, particle distribution, and nonlinear efiects. A significant result from this experiment was that a relaxation mechanism was found from competition between polar and viscous forces, resulting in a transition of the dynamic structure and rheological response as the frequency was varied between small and large limits (Klingenberg, 1993). 31 Parthasarathy and Klingenberg, ( 1995 and 1995b) co-authored a series of papers examining the transition from linear to non-linear rheological behavior for ER suspensions under steady and oscillatory shear flow. The electrostatic polarization model served as the foundation to describe various features of each of the shear mode responses. In each case, the nonlinear deformation occurred from slight rearrangements of the ER structures, not the rupturing of ER cohlmns. Model sirmrlations at low frequency found the rearrangements to occur for strains above a limiting, critical strain, defined as the strain when structures start to show an instability in the limit of zero deformation rate. For oscillatory shear, the non-linear behavior was found to be induced by increasing strain amplitude, or by decreasing deformation frequency or increasing electric field strength (given the strain is higher than the critical strain value). A limitation of this model is that it does not consider Brownian motion, buoyancy, particle sizes and shapes, dielectric properties, and current. Shulman et a1 (1989) studied oscillatory behavior of ER suspensions. The viscous component of the complex modulus was seen to exceed the elastic component for weak electric fields as the volume fraction was increased. Similar to other research, as the electric field was strengthened, G’ increased to the point where it exceeded G" . With volume fraction increases, G' increased in strength. As the strain amplitude was increased, non-linear strain conditions were achieved, and the complex modulus became a function of the strain amplitude. Studying the transition of linear tonon-linear behavior, a threshold strain was achieved, accompanying the destruction of the ER structures. 32 McLeish et al. (1991) calculated a linear fi'equency-dependent modulus of an ER system at low and intermediate concentrations using a particle string model The loss modulus was afi‘ected by broken ER strings, while the storage modulus was dominated by intact ER structures spanning the electrode gap. Results from this study showed that the particle string model adequately accounted for general features of an ER dynamic response. Jordan et al. (1992) accompanied work from McLeish et al. (1991) and compared Viscoelastic data for a mineral type ER fluid with concentrations varying between 0.02 - 0.10, electric fields between 0.1 and 5.0 kV mm'l, and strains of 0.2 - 15% with that of a particle string model Broken and free ER strings contributed to viscoelasticity. As concentration increased, G' and G" were more likely to diverge in the high electric field limit. In other words, the elastic component of the complex modulus became increasingly important with stronger electric fields. The particle string model failed at large strains, with the loss and storage moduli becoming essentially equivalent. At larger strains, the rheological behavior was clearly in the non-linear region, corresponding to a breaking of ER structures beyond elastic limits and may be considered as a yield point for ER materials under certain experimental conditions. A parallel plate rotational rheometer was used to study the ER behavior of a nematic poly n-hexyl isocyanate (PHIC) solution (Yang and Shine, 1992; Shine et al., 1993). Storage and loss moduli at 5% strain were measured. The storage modulus was observed to increase to a maximum, and then decrease. The G' maximum was a function of oscillation frequency. Enhancement of the storage modulus for an electrified 33 suspension was seen to be greater at higher oscillatory fiequencies. At low electric field strengths, the loss modulus was larger for higher frequencies. At larger field strengths, this behavior was reversed. The PHIC is a helical polymer which forms a liquid crystal at high concentrations in non-polar solvents. The molecules have a large permanent dipole and rapidly orient ill the direction of an applied electric field. As a result, the mechanism of polarization was understood to be from dipolar orientation, not interfacial effects. This was a critical finding, since it demonstrated that polarization may occur through difi‘erent mechanisms. An aluminosilicate particle/parafin oil ER fluid was examined by Gamota and Filisko (1991) for dynamic response to sinusoidal strains while exposed to an electric field in the oscillatory frequency range of 300—400 Hz. The rheological response of the material was in the linear Viscoelastic range for electric fields of 0.0 - 3 kV mm". Upon exposure to an electric field, both the storage and loss moduli increased with increasing electric field; i.e., the material showed greater Viscous and elastic behavior, where G' = f(E“) and G” = f(E"l ). Additionally, the moduli showed a dynamic frequency dependence, increasing as the electric field was strengthened. Thurston and Gaertner (1991) described a method for measuring Viscoelastic properties of an ER fluid consisting of corn starch in mineral Oil using oscillatory flow through a thin rectangular tube. Results fi'om this study indicated that, at low field strengths the microstructures degraded at strains less than 0.1, but with higher fields the 34 structures degraded at a strain near 1.0, essentially proving what other research has shown - there is a much greater elastic contribution to the fluid ill the presence of an electric field. Yen and Achom (1991) measured dynamic behavior of an ER fluid consisting of hydrated lithium salt ofpoly(methylacrylate) dispersed in parafin 011. With an electric field, the suspension displayed elastic behavior at low strains and plastic deformation at larger strains accompanied by an electric field dependent yield stress. At low strains, the elastic modulus exhibited an oscillatory fiequency independent behavior, confirming that ER fluids behave elastically at low strains. The authors also studied the dynamic stress- strain relationship of an ER fluid. The dynamic rheological properties were studied as filnctions of an electric field, shear rate, vohrme fiaction, and oscillatory frequency. With the application of an electric field, the ER suspension behaved elastically at low shear fields and underwent plastic deformation, characterized by a field dependent yield stress, as straining increased. Other studies addressing the Viscoelastic response of ER fluids include: Korobko and Shulman (1989), Gamota et al. (1993), and Korobko et al. (1994). 2.3.3. Dimensional Analysis Dimensional analysis involves the identification of important variables affecting a particular phenomenon. These variables are manipulated to form meaningful, dimensionless groups, which are then compared and adjusted to properly describe an observed quantity. Choosing dimensionless groups as ratios of physical quantities provides a means for comparison of different forces (Russel et al., 1989). Gast and 35 Zukoski (1989) presented a review of dimensionless parameters and lists groups relevant to ER, shown as Table 2.2. Recent work has shown that the basic forces underlying the ER phenomenon are electrical, viscous, and thermal in nature (Xu and Liang, 1991; Klingenberg et al., 1991c). Electrostatic forces arise fiom a dielectric mismatch between the two ER phases. Without an electric field, van der Waal's, electrostatic, and steric interaction forces are important for stabilizing the suspension. In addition, thermal motion provides continual interaction. With an electric field, the solid phase polarizes and interacts with surrounding particles through dipolar-like forces causing the formation of chaining structures (Klingenberg et a1, 1991c). In other words, polar forces dominate over colloidal and thermal forces (repulsive electrostatic and attractive Van der Waals) and dictate the fluid behavior (Klingenberg et a1, 1989). The stability of the fluid will be a direct reflection ofhow Well the suspension balances all the competitive forces (Gast and Zukoski, 1989; Otsubo et al., 1992b) 2.3.3.1.Mason Number (Mn) A dimensionless group known as the Mason number (Mn) descrlhes the Viscous and polar interaction of ER fluids. The Mn is the characteristic parameter representing competition between dipolar forces and flow (Gast and Zukoski, 1989; Marshall et al., 1989; Halsey, 1992). The viscous forces are associated with flow and tend to disrupt ER microstructures developed fiom polar interactions. According to Jordan and Shaw 36 TABLE 2.2. (Gast and Zukoski, 1989) DIIVIENSIONLESS TERMS OF ER. Ratio Dimensionless Group van der Waals Arp Thermal 246193]: Electrostatic 4 as g r W2 . o c p Thermal kBT Pollinzatron _ ”3.5.1.3 (Mi): ermal _ kBT Viscous 67777 r 3); “mm“ P6 = k '1: B V'sco s ' 1. u. Mn.._27_cr_2_ Polarization 50 3c (p5) A: Hamaker Constant, J 6: Electric Double Layer Thickness, nm [/11 Electric Potential, mV 37 (1989), the Mn is a major factor ill ER since it incorporates shear rate (7 ), electric field (E), and dielectric properties (,6). = Viscous Forces [2.8] Polanmtlon Forces or __'LZ.___ [2,] ' 2503,1329 The product of ( £05, ) is the dielectric permittivity of the continuous phase, where so is the constant value for the permittivity in a vacuum and a. is the dielectric constant for the continuous phase. Marshall et al. (1989) established much of the preliminary groundwork associated with the Mn and made comparisons of this dimensionless group with the Bingham plastic model, based on the concept that structures within a suspension can withstand a certain degree of stress. The Bingham model represents ER results well at low and high shear rates (large and small Mn). The model was rearranged by dividing the expression with the C shear rate and continuum viscosity ( 77,}? ) to incorporate the Mn: Ac ”G? ”c [ ° ] allowing 1],, = r],,( ngis the suspension viscosity at large shear rates) and 0'0 to scale as Mn'l since 00 at E2; substitution gives 38 %°=I§/Mn+"~ 77. [2.11] with K being a material constant. Dividing through by "/7, gives %Q=MnyMn+l [2.12] with Mn’“ , the critical value of Mn, equal to K 7% . Numerous authors have considered Equation [2.12]: Marshall et a1 (1989), Jordan and Shaw (1989), Klingenberg et al (1991c), and Zukoski (1993). The relative viscosity ratio of the of the electrified suspension viscosity to that of the continuous phase viscosity ( % ) is a filnction only of Mn (Otsubo et al, 1992b). Marshall et al. (1989) found that for a given volume ratio, the relationship between the Viscosity ratio and the drear rate, electric field, and temperature can be expressed as a single filnction of the Mn. Typical plots of yr; as a function of Mn show a decaying curve, with the C dependence diminishing at a large Mn, corresponding to the critical Mn. Mn'“ is a material property, also referred to as a dimensionless yield stress, of the ER fluid dependent upon dielectric properties and particle concentration (Marshall et a1, 1989; Zukoski, 1993), yet independent of the electric field and shear rate (Klingenberg et a1, 1991c). Mn‘“ 39 corresponds with the transition from a Newtonian limit to a yield limit (Klingenberg and Zukoski, 1990). For field values where Mn << 1, the relative viscosity is observed to change in proportion to MD"; while at larger Mn (Mn >> 1), the relative viscosity is independent of the electric field. Temperature efi‘ects are incorporated through values of the continuum viscosity, because no is strongly dependent upon temperature. (Marshall et a1, 1989). Analysis of interparticle forces suggest, at high electric fields and low shear rates, the Mn will be less than unity; therefore, the polar forces dominate. a = 00(E); when Wm .., << 1 [2.13] In the low shear rate range (Mn <<1) the stress transfer is purely electrostatic (Klingenberg et al., I991c). At large Mn, the viscous forces completely dominate the response and the fluid behaves like it would in the absence of an electric field. According to Klingenberg et al. (1991c) , when Mn >> 1, the electric field has no effect on the system viscosity, and As Mn approaches unity, the polar forces become rivaled by viscous forces, and the ER microstmctures are disrupted. When the Mn is approximately 1.0, the Bingham model was expanded: 4o a(E,;>) = a,(E) + 17,0}? + 0,,(E,;>) [2.15] with ou(E,7) representing the intermediate Mn range, where hydrodynamic forces are coupled with electrostatic forces (Klingenberg et al., 1991c). Marshall et a1 (1989), Gast and Zukoski (1989), Klingenberg et aL (19910), Otsubo et al. (1992b), and Zukoski (1993) further discuss importance and contributions of the Mn to ER. 2.3.3.2. A Number (A) When electric fields are considerably small, the ER effect may not be seen because Brownian motion of the particles (random particle motion due to temperature) is so great it overcomes the polar and viscous interactions. A dimensionless number, 21, has been developed by Adriani and Gast (1988), relating forces arising from polar and thermal interactions. 2. reflects the relative magnitude of dipolar forces to thermal (or Brownian) forces: _ Polarization Forces xi -— [2.16] Thermal Forces 127[£ a r3 2E2 ,1 = ”(It/3 [2.17] B where kBT is the product of the Boltzmann constant and temperature. 41 Electrically induced microstructures are likely to be encountered when A is large (2 >> 1), meaning the polar forces are dominating the response over the thermal forces (Halsey, 1992). As the dielectric constant ratio approaches one (Hp/8091), the polarization forces become negligible compared to thermal forces and A is small To invoke ER activity, the dielectric constant ratio must be greater than 1, indicating that the particulates polarize more easily than the continuum Generally, in all but the very weakest of ER fluids, 2. will be much greater than unity; meaning that polar forces dominate thermal forces when establishing the rheological behavior of a suspension (Gast and Zukoski, 1989; Zukoski, 1993). ER effects are not Observed for small electric fields due to Brownian motion of the colloids. This ceaseless motion is caused by temperatures of the surrounding medium The ordered microstructures are constantly being disrupted by the thermal motion of the fluid. ER structures are likely to occur if the electrical forces can overcome the thermal effects. For large xi, the particles are expected to form highly elongated structures (Adriani and Gast, 1988). When A approaches unity, a transition occurs between the two force regimes (Halsey, 1992). Toor (1993) modeled ER microstructures using a multidimensional model based on the point-dipole approximation, and observed a rapid increase of the characteristic time scale with 2. of a model ER fluid. The characteristic time is a measure of the period required for a particle, placed on the surface of a stable droplet, to move one particle diameter. Above a critical 201,), ER structures formed and the column width increased. 42 Below 21., ER columns were not seen. At larger values of 2., the ER columns form rapidly with the fibrillation time scale much shorter than the relaxation time scale (Toor, 1993 ). 2.3.3.3.Peclet Number (Pe) The Peclet Number (Pe) is the ratio between Viscous and thermal forces: _ Viscous Forces Pe - Thermal Forces [2.18] Pe = (mm) [2.19] or 6 3 ‘ Pe = ——m’°r‘°7 [2.20] kBT Zukoski (1993) observed for Pe << 10, increasing the strength of the electric field caused a transition fiom a liquid-like to a crystal-like packing, accompanying the transition fiom thermal force to polar force dominance of the ER microstructures. At high Pe and low A, a sliding string phase occurred, where the particles were oriented along lines of constant velocity within the shear field. The phase was destroyed by increasing 7.. Few publications dedicated to studying the effects of Pe on the ER response were located. 2.3.4. Theoretical Models and Simulations Successfirl ER models rely on the understanding ofinterparticle interactions that occur when fluids are exposed to shear and electric fields. A good model for predicting 43 ER behavior will be capable of considering how the response varies with other factors as well: volume fiaction, particle Size, physical and chemical properties of particles, solvent and solid-liquid interface (Gast and Zukoski, 1989). Adriani and Gast (1988) modeled ER fluids as concentrated suspensions of hard spherical particles, with dipoles induced by an electric field according to the point-dipole approximation with the intent of investigating dipolar interactions in ER fluid rheology. High frequency, small amplitude, oscillatory flow disrupted particle structures and permitted calculation of the elastic shear modulus and the dynamic viscosity. The elastic shear modulus and the dynamic viscosity each increased with particulate concentration. The dynamic viscosity was insensitive to dipole strength, however, the elastic modulus increased with dipole strength. This model ofiered a quantitative prediction of elastic shear modulus and the dynamic viscosity, and was an important step towards modeling ER fluids from a fundamental basis. Klingenberg et al. (1989) also modeled the ER response as polarizable, spherical particles in a nonconducting medium based on the point-dipole approximation. The model incorporated particles exposed to polar forces from the electric field and to hydrodynamic forces from movement through a viscous medium The continuous phase provided hydrodynamic resistance to the particle moving through it. The modeled ER microstructures were found to be independent of the electric field Strength and the continuum viscosity. This model agreed well with experimental data for time scale and appearance of structure formation. The work was aimed at gaining an understanding of conditions required to simulate essential phenomena occurring ill ER fluids. 44 In the first of a series of papers, Klingenberg et a1 (1991) developed a molecular dynamics-like simulation to investigate the ER response at small shear rates. The model was extended from an earlier Simulation (Klingenberg et al., 1989), derived to mimic ER suspensions and focus on small shear rates and the yield stress. Qualitative results from the model predicted a dynamic yield stress dependent upon particle concentration. Predictions agreed well with experimental data. Next in the Klingenberg series, the model was extended to incorporate multipole and multibody contributions to electrostatic interactions in attempts to predicting a yield stress. The extra considerations produced larger magnitudes of yield stress values, indicating that accurate predictions for yield stress could be made (Klingenberg et al, 1991b). Whittle (1990) developed a Brownian dynamics computer simulation, also based ' on dipolar interactions, to model ER fluid behavior for viscosity, yield stress, and shear modulus as a fimction of field strength. Actual rheological data were qualitatively similar to simulation trends. Magnitudes of yield stress were comparatively low and indicated that interparticle forces alone may not be able to account for the magnitude of the yield stress. Experimental results indicated that G' and G" were comparable and both increased with field strength at low fiequency. The simulation, however, showed G" < G' for low field strengths. Thus, the simulation was not successful at low field strengths due to the neglect of hydrodynamic forces by the model. Bonnecaze and Brady (1992) developed a microstructural model to investigate static and dynamic yield stresses of ER fluids. This model incorporated interparticle energy to determine both yield stresses. The dynamic yield stress was correlated to energy 45 jumps occurring during the repetitious reformation and destruction ofER structures. From this theory, a model was developed to predict the dynamic yield stress as a filnction of concentration and dielectric properties. This model found that the dynamic yield stress increases with the dielectric constant ratio, and a maximum yield stress occurred at a 40% volume fraction. A rapid technique for predicting a maximum yield stress in an ER fluid is provided by this research. Klingenberg and Zukoski (1990) developed a model for yield stress and continuous-shear response for ER suspensions. For steady shear conditions, the ER suspension separated into two regions. One region behaved and flowed as a fluid, while the other region contained ER structures aligned with the electric field, but slightly tilted in the direction of the shear flow. The model was based on the concept that ER structure regions degrade with increasing shear rates, and the stress transfer properties of ER fluids are due to the destruction of induced ER bridges. Observations from this study suggested that a critical stress exists and when surpassed, the structures continuously yield. Below the critical stress, the structures deformed elastically. The primary goal of this investigation was to explain the general features by considering only viscous and polarization forces. See and Doi (1992) developed a computer simulation to predict the response of an ER fluid exposed to AC and pulsed DC electric fields. This work investigated the effects of field frequency and the kinetics of ER structure development. It showed that ER stress transfer passes through a minimum as the frequency is increased. Two reasons were provided to explain the minimum fiequency. First, the dielectric properties were 45 frequency dependent and the real part of the complex permittivity was reported to decrease with frequency. The second explanation was that ill an alternating field, the ER structures were continuously being formed and destroyed, since the ER structure strength stems fiom the altemating electric field. The coupling of this destructive mechanism with a damaging shear field may be responsible for the decreased ER response at a minimum frequency. The simulation produced results agreeing qualitatively with experimental results. Chen et a1 (1991) developed a model for particle-particle interactions in an ER fluid, based on electric potential and ER chains extending across the electrode gap. The electrostatic force between two spherical particles ill an infinite chain aligned with an electric field was determined by considering dielectric properties of the ER phases. This model gave interparticle forces in general agreement with experimentally measured values. It was considerably more accurate than a point-dipole approximation. Hill and Steenkiste (1991) studied the speed of an ER fluid response, with the response time defined as the period of time between field application and the formation of the first ER fibril. Response times for an ER suspension ranged from milliseconds to seconds. The response time was observed to vary with volume fraction under AC and DC electric fields. For AC conditions, the response time may be an order of magnitude longer than DC response times. This was a valuable finding since response times for practical applications should be within one millisecond. 47 Atkin et a1 (1991) analyzed and solved traditional constitutive equations for ER fluids in concentric cylinder geometries. This included an ER rheometer composed of concentric cylindrical electrodes, with radial distributions of velocity and potential existing within the fluid gap. The model for this study considered the material as a dielectric continuum based on a modified Bingham plastic constitutive equation with an electric field dependent yield stress. The fluid was assumed a perfect dielectric with shear and current flow considered fully developed, such that end efi‘ects were neglected. The effect of radial field (electric and shear) distributions may be a considerable factor for yield stress-electric field relationships determined in annular film shear and flow rheometers. Bonnecaze and Brady (1989), Wang et al (1989), Lemaire et al. (1992), Lequeux et al. (1992), Mokeev et a1 (1992), Lou et al (1993), Rajagopal et al. (1993), and Lee et al. (1993) also proposed models to explain ER observations. 2.3.5. ER Rheometers Janocha and Rech (1993) described requirements for ER measuring equipment. The most important unit for measuring ER activity is the viscometer, which must be subjected to an electric field. For cylindrical geometry, the field exists between the inner and outer cylinders. It is essential to shield the torque sensors fiom the electric field, preventing interference from stray voltage. Flow curves for ER materials may be obtained using rotational viscometers, geometries include concentric cylinder, cone and plate, parallel plate, cone and cone, and double cone and plate. Brooks (1992) presents a review Of difi‘erent techniques for measuring ER behavior. 48 Voltage requirements of ER suspensions complicate viscometer design. Bailey et al. (1991) provided instruction for the design and construction of an electroviscometer. . This particular ER rheometer design was proven useful for studying stress transfer, response time, and shear field efleas. ER rheometers require a uniform gap without sharp edges, reducing electric field edge efi‘ects. Practical designs generally include rounded edges with concentric cylinder or parallel plate viscometers (Jordan and Shaw, 1989). Practically all viscometers used for measuring an ER response Show a variation in the shear stress across the fluid filled working gap (Stangroom, 1983). Lou et a1 (1993) and Atkin et a1 (1991) used couette viscometers to characterize the response of ER fluids. Lou et a1. (1993) revealed that ER fluids exposed to AC excitation will yield accurate results only if the electric field fiequency is less than 0.1 times the natural frequency of the viscometer torque sensor. Atkin et al. (1991) found a uniform shear rate profile was achieved at large rotational speeds for large electric fields. 2.4. Chocolate Rheology Milk chocolate is a suspension of particles consisting of sugar, cocoa, and milk solids in a continuous fat phase of cocoa butter (Chevalley, 1974). Chocolate processing occurs with the product in the molten state. Understanding the rheology of this material is crucial as the confectionery industry moves to more highly automated molding and enrobing machinery (Minifie, 1980). Knowledge of rheology also provides the industry 49 with measurable properties to assess product quality and processing efliciency (Riedel, 1980) Liquid cocoa butter behaves as a Newtonian fluid; however, with the addition of the suspended particles, milk chocolate deviates from Newtonian behavior (Chevalley, 1974; Beckett, 1988). To accormt for the yield stress inherent to milk chocolate, early attempts to model the chocolate flow behavior used the Bingham expression. The model was inadequate in expressing the viscous behavior of milk chocolate and Steiner (1958) proposed an alternative equation, known as the Casson equation, to model the non-Newtonian flow properties of milk chocolate: 0°" = 03‘ + Kl(}-,)o.s [2.21] where 00 and K1 are arbitrary constants determined from experimental data. In 1973, The International Office of Cocoa and Chocolate (IOCC) adopted the Casson model as the oficial equation for describing steady shear behavior of fluid chocolate (Beckett, 1988; Steiner, 1972). The Casson equation has not been universally accepted and alternative equations have been proposed (Chevalley, 1974). In a paper by Ofoli et al. (1987), a general model (applicable to chocolate) was described for the rheological characterization of inelastic foods: 0‘“ = 03' + K,(;'/)'12 [2.22] Equation [2.22] permits additional flexibility by incorporating two flow behavior indices, m and n;. For the Casson model, a, = n; = 0.5. The indices may vary with 50 temperature and chocolate composition. For example, Chevalley (1991) suggested using a flow behavior index of 0.6 rather than 0.5 to better describe the behavior of milk chocolate. Beckett (1988) states that the Casson equation has always given good agreement with practical results. In attempts to develop equipment and techniques to quickly and accurately measure the Casson parameters, many reports fiom the confectionery industry have emerged over the years (Martin and Smullen, 1981; Pieper, 1986; Robbins, 1979; Bouzas and Brown, 1995). Various factors may influence the flow properties of milk chocolate: fat content, lecithin content, water content, conching time, particle size, temperature, degree of temper, and thixotropy (Chevalley, 1974; Minifie, 1980; Beckett, 1988). The amount of water has a great effect on chocolate rheology. Chocolate normally contains between 0.5 and 1.5% moisture, and if further minute amounts of water are added, the viscosity greatly increases (Minifie, 1980). An explanation for the viscosity increase is that water may form a layer of "syrup" about the surface of a sugar particle, increasing the friction between the particles (Beckett, 1988). The presence of the emulsifier, lecithin, causes the hydrophilic groups of the molecule to attach to the water on the sugar surface and the hydrophobic groups to attach to the cocoa butter (Minifie, 1980) which lowers viscosity by neutralizing the presence of water on the surface of the sugar. 2.5. Variables Influencing ER Behavior The dependent variable, shear stress (a), is a function of numerous, multidimensional variables: 51 a = function(E, f, T, me, (2, 77., 5,, 8p, )3) [2.23] where f is electrical fiequency and me is moisture content. Table 2.3 provides a listing of common ER fluid characteristics for each individual phase and the complete suspension. The following subsections will address each variable and discuss the impact made on ER activity. 2.5.1. Temperature (T) The influence of temperature on ER is complicated. Typical ER fluids demonstrate large increases to shear stress and apparent viscosity with temperature to a certain point, followed by a sharp decline (Deinega and Vinogradov, 1984; Jordan and Shaw, 1989). According to Nelson and Suydam (1993 ), the viscosity depends on temperature for the complete measurement range between 5 and 75 °C. This response may reflect dielectric properties, inasmuch as polarization tends to increase with temperature (Klass and Martinek, 1967b; Uejima, 1972; Jordan and Shaw, 1989). The increased polarization coupled with the lowered continuum viscosity leads to increased charge mobility and a greater ER effect at higher temperatures (Klass and Martinek, 1967; Jordan and Shaw, 1989). At high temperatures, water evaporates and the ER response is lost for moisture- based ER systems (Block and Kelly, 1988; Jordan and Shaw, 1989; Wong and Shaw, 1989; Halsey, 1992). Another factor that may lead to the loss of ER activity at greater temperatures is that thermal forces resulting from Brownian motion become too strong and overpower polar forces responsible for the particle chaining. The dimensionless 52 TABLE 2.3. (Gast and Zukoski, 1989) COMMON CHARACTERISTICS OF ER FLUIDS. Continuum Properties Relative Dielectric Constant gc = 2 .. 15 Low Field Strength Conductivity 10-7 , 10-13 mho m" Viscosity ”c = 0.01 - 10 Pa 5 BMW pc = 0.6 - 2 g cm'3 Particle Properties Shape approximately spherical Size rp = 0.1 - 100 um Relative Dielectric Constant gp = 2 - 40 Suspension Properties Zero Field Viscosity 775 = 0.1 - 10 Pa 5 Volume Fraction ¢ = 0.05 - 0.50 conduCfiVIOl 10-6 _ 10-13 1111“) m-l Typical Field Strengths E = 0.5 - 2 kV mm'l 53 parameter, A, is used to monitor these competitive forces (see Sec. 2.3.3.2). At low temperatures (-20 °C), the ER response is diminished, because ice inhibits the response (Block and Kelly, 1988). Most ER fluids are limited within a temperature range of-20 to 70 °C (Block et al., 1990). Conrad et a1 (1991) determined electrical and rheological properties for an ER fluid (zeolite/silicone oil) between 25 and 160 °C. They formd shear stress increased substantially as the electric field and temperature increased. The fluid strength generally increased with increasing temperature for the fields and temperature range investigated. The fluid dielectric constant and DC conductivity were also found to increase with temperature. Results showed an upper temperature limit, occurring between 120 and 150 °C. Once past this limit, the response no longer increased with temperature (Conrad et al., 1991) 2.5.2. Moisture Content (mc) Most ER fluids require water to respond to an electric field. With these fluids, the absence of water may completely diminish the phenomenon. Nevertheless, too much water leads to ER failure, i.e., the conductivity becomes too large to sustain the electric potential across the electrode gap, eventually leading to electrical breakdown (Gast and Zukoski, 1989; Block et al., 1990). The optimum moisture content for ER behavior is between 5 and 10% by weight (Block and Kelly, 1988; Zukoski, 1993). As mentioned in section 2.5.1., the presence of water ill ER systems limits the temperature range where the phenomenon will exhlhit measurable results. 54 Except for a small class of anhydrous ER fluids, moisture content plays a critical role ill producing ER activity (Wong and Shaw, 1989; Block et a1, 1990). Shaw (1993) describes an approach for making anhydrous particulate phases with low [conductivities while remaining highly polar. Jordan and Shaw (1989) report that the largest ER response occurs in the range when water is strongly absorbed by the particles. Absorbed water consists of two types. The first type is adsorbed to the solid surface, forming electric double layers; while the other type is found at the inner part of the particle (Uejima, 1972). It has been suggested that water absorbed by the solid phase affects the surface charge density of the electric double layers, increasing the permittivity and leading to stronger particle-particle interactions (Uejima, 1972; Jordan and Shaw, 1989). BR behavior is strongly affected by adsorbed substances at the solid-liquid interface and the understanding of polar forces due to surface agents may be a key to additional understanding of the phenomenon. With the recent development of anhydrous ER fluids, the contribution of moisture to the ER phenomenon is not yet clear (Kordonsky et al., 1991). Otsubo et al (1992; 1992b) studied the effects of adsorbed water on an ER fluid consisting of silica particles suspended in silicone oil. Both reports concluded that the physically adsorbed water enabled the ER response. Large amounts of water did not yield excellent ER behavior. When this ER fluid was exposed to heat treatment, desorption of the water followed, and subsequently a loss of ER activity. Otsubo et al. (1992) improved the ER response by modifying the surface charge of the silica particles with the addition of 55 silanol groups. Similarly, Kordonsky et al. (1991) observed that water sorbed by a filler and salt formation enhanced the ER efi‘ect. 2.5.3. Electrical Frequency (1) Frequency has a large impact on ER behavior. The ER phenomenon occurs under AC or DC conditions. For low fiequencies (50-60 Hz), practically DC, the shear stress does not vary with frequency. However, as the frequency range increases to the range of 100 to 10,000 Hz, the rate ofmicrostructure formation diminishes (Vorobeva et al., 1969; Block and Kelly, 1988; Jordan and Shaw, 1989; Jones, 1989; Block et al., 1990). Also, as the frequency is increased, there is a decrease in ER material permittivity because the dispersant does not have sufficient time to adjust and polarize in a large alternating field (Jordan and Shaw, 1989; Yang and Shine, 1992). In support of this statement, Bezruk et al. (1972b) observed a diminishing of the aggregate size with increases in the electric frequency. According to Hill and Steenkiste (1991), particle movement is linear under DC excitation. However, with an AC field, the particles oscillate and delay formation of the microstructures generating a greater response time. As the fiequency approaches zero, corresponding to DC excitation, more time is available for the particles to polarize, maximizing ER activity (Thurston and Gaertner, 1991). It is generally believed the ER response is not present at larger frequencies because the particle fibrils cannot follow the rapidly changing field direction. Hill and Steenkiste (1991) observed macroscopic particle motion in a fluid consisting of water coated glass beads in silicone oil at fiequencies 56 approaching 10 kHz. This particular fluid displayed no loss of response as a fimction of frequency. Uejima (1972) also observed ER activity at a large frequency (2000 kHz) and concluded that the response time for the phenomenon was extremely fast. Thurston and Gaertner (1991) compared viscoelastic measurements of a corn starch in mineral oil mixture exposed to DC excitation and a 1 kHz AC field. Conclusions showed the viscoelastic response of ER materials was similar for AC and DC fields. See and Doi (1992 and 1992b) used computer simulations to observe frequency effects on ER fluids. As the frequency was increased, the stress transfer was observed to pass through a minimum. For this study, an electric field was applied as a pulsed on/ofl‘ response. The pulses were controlled and set to varying frequencies. Results from this paper indicated that at low frequency pulses, the particles were able to follow the field and the shear stress tended to increase. At higher fiequencies, the electric field was removed before the clusters could completely form, leading to a shear stress decrease. Finally, at very high frequencies, the electric field was reapplied before the clusters completely collapsed and the shear stress again increased. Jones (1989) further explained these results ill terms of dipolar alignment with the applied field. For specific conditions imposed on the dielectric constants and conductivites of the solid phase and carrier fluid a certain fiequency range causes ER microstructures to align perpendicularly to the applied field causing a diminished efi‘ect. At lower and higher frequencies, the chains still align with the electric field, culminating ill a greater torque response. 57 2.5.4. Volume Ratio (¢) Volume ratio, which describes the fiaction Of the total volume in the particulate phase, is a very important parameter in the ER phenomenon. Generally, the shear stress and apparent viscosity of ER suspensions increase with concentration (Klass and Martinek, 1967; Gast and Zukoski, 1989). It has been observed that volume fractions are generally in the range 0.1 5 ¢ 5 0.4 (Block and Kelly, 1988; Gast and Zukoski, 1989; POOL 1990; Hill and Steenkiste, 1991). Below this range, there is generally no observable Viscosity enhancement associated with ER However, high concentrations of solid matter can cause the loss of fluidity of the material All optimum vohrme ratio exists where the shear stress can be maximized while still maintaining fluidity when exposed to electric fields (Jordan and Shaw, 1989). In addition, higher concentrations may lead to contact across the electrode gap, essentially shorting the system, causing loss of ER activity (Block and Kelly, 1988). Vohlme fraction strongly influences the ER response time. Hill and Steenkiste (1991) used high-speed imaging technology to observe fibril formation to estimate a response time, where response time was defined as the time interval between field application and the observation of the first developed fibril. For a volume fraction of less than 10%, the response time may differ by an order of magnitude. Response times for an ER fluid, consisting of water coated spheres suspended in silicone oil, spanned the time range fiom seconds to milliseconds. For typical ER devices, the response needs to be in 58 the range of milliseconds. According to this study, the response time varied with vohlme ratio for both AC and DC excitation. 2.5.5. Dielectric Properties (3) Dielectric properties of a two phase ER system determine the magnitude of the suspension response to an electric field. The continuum, usually an insulating oil, must have a low dielectric constant so it can withstand exposure to large electric fields without suffering from dielectric breakdown (Block and Kelly, 1988; Jordan and Shaw, 1989; See and Doi, 1992; Zukoski, 1993). For water based ER materials, water absorbed ill the particles create a large dielectric mismatch between the phases (scatsp). This is why many researchers have conchlded that water is essential for a strong ER response. The permittivity Of the solid phase is significantly greater than the insulator permittivity (seasp ), allowing particle polarization to generate particle-particle interactions (Klass and Martinek, 1967b). Ifthe solid phase has a dielectric constant equal to the surrounding medium, both phases will polarize to the same degree resulting in no accumulation of charge (Gast and Zukoski, 1989). As stated in Section 2.5.1., permittivity increases with temperature, leading to enhanced polarizability at higher temperatures (Klass and Martinek, 1967b; Block et al., 1990; Zukoski, 1993). The ability of a material to polarize is fiequency dependent, as reflected by the complex permittivity (e): 59 e = e'(f) + ie"(f) [2.24] The complex permittivity reflects the rate at which a material may polarize (Klass and Martinek, 1967b; Pool, 1990; Block et al, 1990). When this permittivity is divided by a constant known as the permittivity of a vacuum (so), that quantity is known as the dielectric constant. The polarization of materials is conventionally examined by measuring the relative permittivity (5') and the dielectric loss (5" ) as a filnction of frequency (Uejima, 1972; Block and Kelly, 1988). Interfacial polarization oflen produces a considerably higher 6' at a low fiequency for an ER fluid over the base medium, supporting the idea that the solid phase is extremely important to polarization (Block and Kelly, 1988). ER response dependence on the electric and shear fields is not well understood, because temperature, moisture content, and volume fraction each impact the relationship. 6" is dependent on the electric field strength, suggesting that polarizable components, such as mobile charge carriers and surfactants are being activated (Block and Kelly, 1988; Jordan and Shaw, 1989). The dielectric constant of a suspension (85), has a strong temperature dependence saturating at 100 °C. as increases with the electric field intensity because the degree of chaining increases (Conrad et al., 1991). 6' is strongly afl‘ected by shearing, a phenomenon commonly referred to as flow modified permittivity (FMP) (Deinega and Vinogradov, 1984; Block and Kelly, 1988; Jordan and Shaw, 1989; Block et al., 1990). During rotational flow, particles or interacting clusters of particles spin and disrupt the principal axis for polarization, causing 60 a change in particle alignment and aggregate deformation. Shear defamation may disturb the charge distribution surrormding a particle. The rate of spinning is what causes the e' to have a shear rate dependence. For systems where the permittivity is shear sensitive, the dependence of e on electric frequency is common. Increased particle alignment with flow direction diminishes the a dependence on electric frequency. Likewise, at large frequencies the a dependence on shear disappears (Deinega and Vinogradov, 1984; Block and Kelly, 1988). Block and Kelly (1988) present a thorough review of the complex permittivity for ER suspensions. 2.5.6. Particle Size and Shape The optimum particle size is between 0.04 and 50 um; but, size and shape of particulates are not crucial variables for invoking the ER response (Block and Kelly, 1988; Jordan and Shaw, 1989). However, later work by Kanu and Shaw (1992) conflicts with this statement. They examined the roles of particle geometry and electrical properties on ER behavior and found that particle shape and size may be important since faster response times were observed for smaller particles. Also, particle size may impact the ER phenomenon because small particles (< 0.1 11m) are eiqlosed to Brownian motion from thermal effects. Thus, thermal forces compete with the electrical forces for dominance over ER activity. Large particles react too slowly to the applied electric field since hydrodynamic forces opposing particle mobility are 61 greater for larger solids. Nevertheless, an ER response has been reported with particles as large as 200 to 5000 11m (Kanu and Shaw, 1992). The size limits where no ER activity is observed are not certain (Jordan and Shaw, 1989). Typical ER fluids are composed of spheroidal particulates in the range of 0.1 to 100 um (Gast and Zukoski, 1989; Zukoski, 1993). The particle size distribution may be very broad, as is the case with flour. Size and shape of the particles are poorly understood ER variables deserving additional research (Gast and Zukoski, 1989). 2.5.7. Electric Field (E) The electric field is responsible for inducing particle polarization, necessary for an ER response. It has been well documented that apparent viscosity and the enhanced yield stress of ER suspensions scales approximately with E2 (Klass and Martinek, 1967; Klass and Martinek, 1967b; Uejima, 1972; Klingenberg and Zukoski, 1990; Conrad et al., 1991; Atkin et al., 1991; Jordan et al., 1992; Katsikopoulos and Zukoski, 1992; Zukoski, I993). Tao et al (1989) and Jaggi et al. (1989) described a critical electric field, dependent on solids concentration and temperature, required to produce the transition fiom a liquid to solid-like behavior. Up to a threshold electric field, the ER response is very weak Once this field is achieved, resistance to shearing grows rapidly. The greater the concentration of solids, the more pronounced the relationship between the shear stress and electric field (Deinega and Vinogradov, 1984). 62 Rozakeas et al (1992) observed a reduction ill torque response as the electric field intensity was increased. The authors claimed this was due to buildup of particle concentration at the rotor surface resulting in a decreased solid concentration in suspension. The study failed to look at various electrical frequencies. In addition, the suspension did not appear to be a genuine ER fluid since the continuum consisted of an aqueous medium instead of an insulating oil 2.5.8. Shear Rate (7 ) According to Jordan and Shaw (1989) and Deinega and Vinogradov (1984), the ER response is strongest at low shear rates, with a diminishing response as the shear rate increases. At large shear rates ( 1000 s"), the field induced microstructures degrade, and the response curves are nearly independent of the applied field - corresponding to a large Mn (Thurston and Gaertner, 1991; Lou et al., 1993). The imposition of a flow field tends to disturb and distort particle bridges, ultimately rupturing ER microstructures. Particles in a shear flow are constantly sheared with respect to one another, continually colliding, agglomerating, and breaking up (Gast and Zukoski, 1989; Halsey, 1992; Otsubo et al., 1992b). Microscopically, the shear field perturbs the charge distribution surrounding the particle and counteracts the electric field induced dipole, resulting in a decreased solid phase permittivity (Klass and Martinek, 1967b). Klass and Martinek (1967) and Uejima (1972) report that the enhanced Viscosity scales inversely with shear rate (at a given vohlme ratio) and electric field strength. 63 r1(E.¢)¢ 2332—83. 9:59.32 o\.. not: he 8a: 5.:— ue v.32 we 8a: 5 25,—. :o>¢ oEEam ism—13V Gav—aha: 00: Ch. QZHG¢¢00< “DORE amy— A—g GZ< :Om KO.”— FZHPZOU WHERE—AVE Flo—UK”?— fi 33; 96 temperature relationship for drying flour at 50 °C. From this short study, it was learned that approximately 50% of the moisture could be removed in a 3 hour time period. The two levels of moisture content. were 12.9% ( equal to 100% of total moisture in the powder) and 6.4% ( equal to 50% of total moisture) water on a dry basis. 3.6.2. Fractional Factorial Design A 2M experimental design was used to analyze the data, that is a one-fourth fraction of a fidl 26 design. A value added statistical technique determined the specific variable combinations for individual tests. Table 3.4 shows the 24 factor combinations for experimentation. Whenever the letter appears in a combination, the factor is set at the high level. So, test combination 13 would consist of the following factor levels: 300 Volts mm", 25 °C, 20 % concentration, soft red flour, canola oil, and at 50 % moisture content. This design was constructed by adding factors E to ABC and F to BCD treatment combinations of a complete 24 factorial. This is a resolution IV design allowing for the estimation of all main effects and some interactions (Hicks, 1993). 3.7. Dimensional Analysis Dimensional analysis is a powerful numerical method commonly applied when a System response does not have a well defined theoretical basis, as is the case with ER Conversion of the variables into meaningfirl dimensionless groups (IT) simplifies BXperimentation by decreasing the number of independent variables. The objective of this 97 TABLE 3.4. 16 STATISTICSL TREATMENTS FOR FLOUR/OE DATA. ae bef abf cef acf bc abce df adef bde abd cde acd bcdf . abcdef 98 analysis was to identify meaningful IT groups and predict relationships between them to describe and model the ER phenomenon. 3.7.1. Description of Physical System To employ dimensional analysis, all that is required is a knowledge of the principal variables responsible for the effect. In this case, the ER effect is a function of shear stress, electric field intensity, shear rate, viscosities, dielectric permittivities of the suspension phases, volume fiactions, and others. A complete listing of important variables and their symbols follow: mppgxaV-eggwh 8 k3 mo ’10 T : relative permittivity, dimensionless : dielectric constant of continuum, dimensionless : permittivity of a material in a vacuum, 8.8542 x 10’12 CZN'l rn'2 : volume fraction, dimensionless : shear rate, s'l : apparent viscosity, Pa 5 : apparent viscosity of continuum, Pa 5 : density of continuum, g cm'3 : density of particles, g cm’3 : electric field intensity, V mrn'I : gravitational acceleration, m s‘2 : Boltzmann constant, 1.381 x 10'23 N m K" : moisture content, dimensionless : particle radius, m : absolute temperature, K The Buckingham 1T theorem was applied to the aforementioned variables to establish dithensionless groups (Langhaar, 1951). 99 3.7.2. FLTQG System The FLTQO system was employed for the dimensional analysis of ER variables. [Q] is a dimension for electric charge. The standard unit of electric charge is the coulomb, which is the force exerted by two unit charges separated by a distance of one meter in a vacuum. [F], [L],[T'], and [8] are dimensions for force, length, time, and temperature, respectively. The ER variables and their FLTQG dimensions are: [H] : dimensionless [3.] : dimensionless [6‘0] : I" L’2 Q2 [¢] : dimensionless [2" l : T1 [17] : F L" T [17.] : F L‘2 r [p.] : F L‘4 T2 [p,] : F L" r2 [E] : F Q'1 [g] : L T2 [kg] 2 F L 9' [me] : dimensionless [rp] : L [T] : 6 The dimensionless ER variables 5., ¢ , me, and ,6 are inherently dimensionless groups. In addition, viscosity and density ratios (17/71. and pp/pc) were identified as dimensionless. Therefore, five terms, ¢, mc, ,8, 77, and Fe. were pulled from the analysis and immediately assigned to corresponding II groups. 1 00 3.7.3. IT Group and Prediction Equation Development In this analysis, the dimensionless viscosity ratio was chosen as the dependent variable, and expressed as a function of all the independent ER variables: ”Me = {(mca ¢a fl, EC, pp/pc, 77¢, E9 IP’ 60, k3. T, 7 9 pp, 8) [37] According to Buckingham’s Theorem, each dimensional, independent variable is raised to an unknown order to insure dimensional homogeneity, n/nc = C 778 5" 0° 80“ ka‘ 1‘ 7' ”pp“ ai [3.8] where C is a proportionality constant. Substituting the FLTQO dimensions for the ER variables gives [1] = [1] [FL’ZTJ’ [FQ"]b [L]c [F‘L'zQzld [FEST [9]f ...[I"]8 [F L" r21“ [LT2]‘ [3.9] Checking rank, to guarantee linear independence between the FLTQB system dimensions, the exponents were determined and results were simplified into four IT terms. Adding the six predetermined dimensionless groups, gives a total often 1T terms. Common ER dimensionless groups include the Mason number, the 7» number, and the Peclet number. These terms may be written as combinations of IT terms from the current analysis. Each IT group may be expressed as a relationship between the remaining dimensionless groups: 1 01 11.: C nz'rlgbrL‘IIS‘rrngfl‘Issnghnm‘ [3.10] The erqionents and proportionality constant of Equation 3.10 are determined using a multiple linear regression technique to develop prediction equations to model the phenomenon. During the natural logarithm transformation of the multiple regression technique, the original 1T groups cannot equal zero. To counteract this limitation, 100 Volts mm'1 was added to each electric field intensity (E) value. 3.8. Thermal Properties of Milk Chocolate in an Electric Field An apparatus was designed to simultaneously measure thermal conductivity (k) and volume specific heat (pop), using a parameter estimation technique. The method is based upon the mirror image concept (Danielson and Sidles, 1969). In this technique, identical disks sandwich a heat source, and a constant heat flux (q) is split between the two sides. Outside surfaces are well insulated and permit the assumption of an adiabatic boundary condition. To firrther simplify calculations, disk thickness was kept small in comparison to the disk diameter, allowing for the one-dimensional heat transfer assumption. This technique was coined the Mirror Image Method (MIM). Zhang and Lloyd (1993) calibrated the mirror image apparatus (the same one used in this research) with water to ensure that the estimated thermal conductivity was physically correct. The authors found that the procedure produced thermal conductivities differing by 4.77% from the published data. Thus, the technique was validated as an acceptable method for measuring thermal conductivity of liquids. 1 02 3.8.1. Heat Transfer Mathematical Model The differential equation describing one-dimensional heat transfer is 6T 82T —-- = — 3.11 at a 62’ [ l where: a : thermal diffusivity (kp"c,"). m2 s‘1 T : temperature, °C t : time, s z : position, 111 From the general difierential equation, the one-dimensional analytical solution for a flat plate design insulated on one side and heated by a steady heat flux on the other is given by Beck et a1 (1992) as [exp(- n2 1t 2t )]cos(nrtz ) [3.12] . . 1 . 1 . T =t +——z +— 2 3 2(2)— 22; n2 with the dimensionless variables defined as T‘ = (ixr - To) [3.13] qL t. = g [3.14] z' = _Lz_ [3.15] 1 03 Equation 3.12 is valid for the MIM with the following assumptions: negligible contact resistance, homogeneous sample, one dimensional heat transfer, negligible heat transfer at the edges (adiabatic), constant heat flux The analytical solution of Equation 3.11 incorporates the following initial and bormdary conditions: T‘(z‘,t‘ = 0) = 0 [3.16] — =0,t = 3.17 az.(z ) [ ] 2T. (2’ =1.t')= 0 [3.18] 62 The analytical solution given by Equation 3.12. requires a known value of the heat flux defined as: q =—— [3.19] To solve for q, the parameters for Equation 3.19 were specified as follows: V, the AC voltage to the heater, was equal to 12.5 Volts; R, the resistance of the heater, was equal to 10.0 Ohms; and A, the total surface area accounting for both sides was equal to 9.12 x 10'3 m2. Substituting these values into Equation 3.19 gave the total flux a numerical value of 1713 W m'2; however, since only halfthe total flux is exposed to each side of the "mirror", q equaled 856 W m'2. 1 04 The solution for a one-dimensional, transient heat transfer problem requires that temperature be a function of time and position. Thermal properties are estimated from the transient bormdary tenrperatures and the heating rate of the sample. 3.8.2. Mirror Image Method (MIM) Plates The disks assembled on one side of the heater consists of an aluminum plate, teflon O-ring gasket serving as the sample fluid reservoir, copper plate, followed by another teflon O—ring gasket. Each disk was approximately 7.62 cm in diameter. The teflon gasket included a small aperture permitting the injection of fluid into the system reservoir that was 0.3 cm thick (L). All disks were clamped between two wooden blocks. The purpose of the final O-rings and the wooden blocks were to add extra insulation to the system, thereby satisfying the adiabatic boundary condition specified by Equation 3.18. Figure 3.4 illustrates the overall plate series. 3.8.3. Overall Apparatus To liquefy milk chocolate bars, a Brookfield (Stoughton, MA) Model EX-lOO water bath was used. Liquid chocolate was deposited into the MINI sample reservoir, and the constant heat flux boundary condition was satisfied by turning on a Hewlett Packard Model (Boise, ID) 6024A DC power supply. This unit sent 12.5 Volts to the heating disk (10.0 (2 resistance) at the center of the MIM plates. To monitor the sample temperature, thermocouples (20 gage) were cemented at the center of the fluid side of each metal plate (2 = 0 cm and z = L = 0.3 cm). The plates acted as the fluid border as well as electrodes for the electric field. Fluid temperatures at the electrodes were recorded by a Fluke Model ll 105 Heater (A) Aluminum Plate, 0.1 cm; (B) Teflon O-Ring Sample Reservoir, 0.3 cm; (C) Copper Plate, 0.1 cm; (D) Teflon O-Ring Insulator, 0.3 cm; (E) Wooden Block, 2.0 cm FIG. 3.4. “MIRROR IMAGE” APPARATUS PLATE SERIES FOR DETERMINATION OF HEAT TRANSFER PROPERTIES OF MILK CHOCOLATE. 1 06 2625A data acquisition system The high voltage requirement was supplied by a power amplifier. After testing, data was downloaded from the Fluke data acquisition system into a personal computer for parameter estimation. Figure 3.5 depicts the overall experimental setup for determining thermal properties. 3.8.4. MIM Testing Procedure Two chocolate bars were melted at 40 °C using the water bath. Once liquefied, approximately 6 ml of chocolate were injected into the sample reservoir of the MIM plates using a heated hypodermic syringe. The milk chocolate temperature was monitored with the data acquisition system to insure that the thermocouples were not damaged or dislodged during the injection procedure. A constant temperature across the sample was required as an initial condition for each test. Formal data collection was started once this initial condition was satisfied. The data acquisition system scanned temperatures at three second intervals. At time zero, the high voltage power amplifier was initiated, sending a predetermined electric field of 0, 300, or 450 Volts mm'1 at 60 Hz to the molten chocolate. The next step was to apply the constant heat flux boundary condition by activating the power supply to the heating disk. Boundary temperatures were scanned for approximately three minutes with data collection continuing to occur at three second intervals. Milk chocolate temperatures varied between 30 and 60 °C during each test. Once the experiment had run for approximately three minutes, power to the apparatus was turned off in the following order: the heating disk power supply, the high 107 Fluke. . . HP Power Supply Data S:‘ilozéctleulifrtron . Thermocouple Wire \ Q ( .2 Mirror Image Plates High ““2” “mm“ Power Supply ........ . . .. FIG. 3.5. GENERAL CONFIGURATION FOR MIM EXPERIMENTAL EQUIPMENT. 1 08 voltage power amplifier, and finally the data acquisition system Raw data, consisting of temperatures at the fluid bormdaries and the times when sampling occurred, were stored for later analysis. 3.8.5. Data Analysis Equation 3.12 was programmed into a Microsoft Excel (Redmond, WA) spreadsheet program This equation, along with recorded temperatures and the heat flux, allowed for estimation of the thermal parameters at each thermocouple location. Differences between the actual and theoretical temperatures at each boundary were determined, then squared, and finally added together to produce a summation of the squares value. The values of k and pep producing the lowest sum of the squares between the actual to theoretical temperatures were selected as the optimal values. When the differences are the smallest at each location, the predicted heat transfer properties more accurately reflect experimental values. A common statistical test was employed to compare the sample means of the conductivities determined with a voltage and without a voltage. The t distribution test statistic was used at a 95% confidence interval to determine whether the applied electric field had a significant influence on the thermal conductivity (Hicks, 1993). W This chapter describes findings from the research and attempts to offer explanations for the observations. 4.1. Electrorheological Behavior of Milk Chocolate Data from this study give conclusive evidence that milk chocolate is an electrorheological fluid. The work reported here is Imique because it is the first documented research identifying an actual food product as an electrorheological substance. Experimental results, shown as Table 4.1, offer a comparison of Casson model parameters. Table 4.1 also gives the apparent viscosities calculated at two different shear rates. Milk chocolate displays shear-thinning behavior regardless of an applied voltage. As the shear rate increases, the apparent viscosity decreases. The coeflicient of determination values (r2) for the data fit to the Casson model indicate good correlations between data and model However, as the voltage is increased, some deviation fiom the Casson model is observed as indicated by decreasing r2 values. A transition (Fig. 4.1) occurs as the voltage is increased fi'om 150 to 300 Volts mm‘1 at a temperature of 35.0 °C. To explain this transition, dimensionless groups have been developed to compare the tendencies for different forces to dominate flow behavior. The Mason number (Mn) describes the behavior of ER fluids as the ratio of viscous to 109 110 TABLE 4.1. CASSON MODEL PARAMETERS AND APPARENT VISCOSITIES FOR MHK CHOCOLATE DATA. Volts mm’l Temp. r2 K 00 r] @ 17 @ 0.033s-1 0.267s-1 DC °C (Pa s)0-5 Pa Pa s Pa s 0 35.0 0.97 5.8 7.6 494.4 133.9 0 37.8 0.98 5.1 8.7 427.2 109.1 0 40.6 0.98 4.6 5.1 330.3 85.3 150 35.0 0.93 6.3 7.0 489.6 153.4 150 37.8 0.92 5.6 7.4 481.6 138.5 150 40.6 0.92 5.6 4.8 315.0 124.5 300 35.0 0.94 6.0 8.7 464.4 178.1 300 37.8 0.93 6.0 10.8 552.0 190.6 300 40.6 0.93 6.4 10.6 577.3 201.0 450 35.0 0.88 5.7 19.6 950.5 265.0 450 37.8 0.77 5.2 20.2 993.1 270.9 450 40.6 0.96 7.3 5.0 328.2 150.8 Uo 9mm u H. h< €9.44: HEEGUGm—D :2 nmc<¢§< kc ZG—Hgflm—Hbééu a—(U—UOx—OH—szM—HUHJH .ué .03— 93 3mm .85 w a o m a. m N _ o 111 - d u u u d 0 - oo .o . 1 ood— .. coda 5.53323 1T §_§_o> 9: III 852.5 o 1.1 : ocdm a code i oodn (13d)953118 mans r code sewed _mcoEmcmfi. . 2:: f 2:; .. code Do O.mm H h. sodo— 1 12 polar forces. It is possible that the transition period observed in Figure 4.1 is caused by polar forces beginning to dominate the response over viscous forces. In other words, polarized particles are beginning to form structures, causing a greater resistance to flow. Figures 4.2 and 4.3 depict situations where the polar forces are dominating the effect at larger temperatures: as the voltage increases, the resistance to flow increases. One expects that the torque response for a fluid should decrease as temperature increases, i.e., the material should becomes less viscous. However, in the case of ER fluids, temperature increases the polar nature of the particles, enhancing the creation of microstructures which deter flow (Fig. 4.4). At a constant voltage, the greatest torque response is recorded at the highest temperature (40.6 °C). Figure 4.5 firrther supports the effects of temperature on the ER response. This graph displays the apparent viscosity at a constant electric field, 300 Volts mm", while the system temperature is increased. Clearly, the resistance to flow increases with temperature in the presence of an electric field. In the absence of an electric field, practically all fluid foods exhibit a decrease in apparent viscosity at higher temperatures. The opposite response described here is typical of the unusual behavior found in ER fluids. A common characteristic of ER fluids is that the yield stress is a function of the applied electric field, and milk chocolate is no exception. A yield stress is defined as the minimum force required to initiate flow. Referring to Table 4.1, one can see a trend developing where the yield stress is dramatically increasing at higher voltages (10 - 20 Pa). According to the hypothesis, once the polar forces begin to dominate, the yield stress .Uo cfin n h. .F< (9%.: HEEGUGEU :2 GHQ<¢H>< hO ZG—hgmsgu iU—UOACEOEHAH .Né .9: Ave sum .85 w a o n 4 m N _ o 113 - u u u u d 1‘ - OO .O _ cod. EEE_o>oom+ \ . coda ESE—Ox; cm— 11.1 EEE_O> c 1.1 x ccdm 1 code r ccdn (8d) saws mus r ccdo .. code 1 ccdw r code Do «Sm n h cocc— 114 .Uo 3.4 n h .5 5.4.: mhjcucmu 24:2 omega—>44 .3 zcfiémmhugu A8m+ .4 8.8 882:5 on. III 883.3 o 101 .. ccdm 1.. code 1.. ocdn (9d) 993118 1391-15 l r code .1 Odds l r ccdw r code Do cdv n H. coco— ._-aa 33> 8... :4 <55 336925 05:2 565.85. .3 zeifiifiugu inc—ceaemmmcEa—QMH .4.4 .6: 2-3 23— 32$ w h c n v m N _ c r cod - n h 115 ‘- q!- di- - d .- .11- ‘ cod— 1. coda l u ccdm U0 ©.OV+ u. 4.2+ \ u. 921?. 1.. cod»4 l : ccdm (9d) 959118 mmlS 1 .. code I r ccdn 1.. odd» LT code _.88 33> 8m cocc— 5-... 2N3 3:: «Sim az< A433 33> 83 36... 0.5833 hzfimzeu .3 3923mm“... an... 2. amass—maze... ze 39733:me3: 36555: >5...— 35450636 03:: .m.4 OE 116 Coo 2388th no o3 mm on «4 O4 nm cm H w k k a . . o I I0 I”‘.~"€'O¢ 401"‘ 4’ 1.cn .0 ‘ «I‘ O I o < -. 2: d I. d O‘- o .- 32 V . . . 3 2 BE. 4 o I .. 8N m 0 N4 SE m o 5 5m... 0 m 4 I! .. ON I .m .08 ( O .4 on < o . .. 84 43 EN 3 4a .33 33> 23 Q on»4 1 17 increases; hence, the force required to establish milk chocolate flow is larger due to the presence of polarized particulate chains. At the upper limits of the temperature and voltage range, erratic results were experienced. At 450 volts and 40.6 °C, the system displayed a breakdown (Table 4.1). Rather than continuing the trend of increasing yield stress and apparent viscosity with voltage and temperature, the phenomenon disappeared. A possrble explanation for the lost effect is that the cocoa butter faction of milk chocolate contains polar seed crystals which liquefy at higher temperatures (Davis and Dirnick, 1989). Once the polar seed crystals melt into the liquid medium, the non-polar continuum is gone and so is the ER response. Upon witnessing ER activity in milk chocolate, the question arose as to which solid substance of the material, sugar, cocoa, milk solids, or combination, was responsible for the microstructures commonly associated with the phenomenon. Milk chocolate, consisting of approximately 31% fat, has a high composition of cocoa butter (15%) with the remaining lipids supplied by the milk. It is understood that the lipid faction serves as the nonconducting continuum for the two-phase system A preliminary rheological test was performed on Hershey’s dark chocolate to determine the importance of milk solids to the ER behavior of milk chocolate. Dark chocolate and milk chocolate have similar compositions, with the exception that dark chocolate contains no milk solids. In the presence of an electric field of up to 450 Volts mm“, no ER activity was observed for the 1 18 dark chocolate, leading to the conclusion that the milk portion was necessary for inciting the ER phenomenon in milk chocolate. Milk proteins consist of two classes, whey and caseins. According to Fennema (1985), caseins exhibit a dipolar structure composed of a charged domain and a hydrophobic globular domain at the normal pH of milk. The whey proteins are globular, with a distribution of nonpolar, polar, and charged residues. Functionality of milk proteins is strongly dependent upon the environment, i.e. pH, temperature, or polarity. Manipulation of the protein fimctionality can be performed by adjusting these variables. For example, by adjusting the system pH to the isoelectric point of caseins, these proteins will display a net charge of zero. Understanding the polar nature of milk proteins validates the notion that these macromolecules may be responsible for the polarizing the solid phase of milk chocolate when exposed to an electric field. 4.2. Statistical Analysis of Flour/Oil Main effects and lower level interactions of six ER variables (voltage, temperature, concentration, moisture content, flour type, and oil type) were calculated using Yates algorithm, a method to carry out calculations involved with an AN OVA - Analysis of Variance (Hicks, 1993 ). The 16 treatment effects of the ER variables were determined from a 2&2 fractional factorial design. As previously discussed, a drawback of a fractional factorial design is that effects are aliased with other effects. For example, the main effects are aliased with three-letter and above combinations. Higher order treatment effects are assumed negligible for this analysis. Table 4.2 shows the 16 treatments and the aliased 1 19 treatment combinations. From this study, AN OVA tables, including F statistics and p- values, were prepared. The sum of the squares (SS) between treatments were calculated during the early portion of the experimental analysis to measure variation among sample means (Table 4.3). SS was determined from the number of replications and the square of the estimated effects from Yates algorithm with one degree of freedom. SS percentages were tabulated neglecting the two three-letter interactions, reflecting the general importance of the variable effects to the phenomenon. Table 4.4 shows the defining equations with the confounding block efi‘ects and SS percentiles for each treatment at the two viscometer speeds considered. The initial analysis indicated that factor D, flour type, was insignificant to the ER response, ranking 10th of 13 interactions in importance according to SS values. The remaining five variables: voltage, temperature, concentration, oil type, and moisture content ranked in the top seven efl‘ects for overall significance. Table 4.5 displays the ranking for the treatment effects at the two rotational speeds and overall Next, variable D was removed from the analysis, and the data were projected onto the five remaining variables. Initially, the four observations for each treatment demonstrated a non-normal distribution. The F-statistic of an AN OVA is based upon a treatment being normally distributed with a homogeneous distribution. So, the natural logarithms of each apparent viscosity were taken to generate a normal distribution and to stabilize the variances. By examining the natural logarithms of the residuals composing TABLE 4.2. ALIASED SETS FOR A 2... FRACTIONAL FACTORIAL DESIGN. (I I ABCE IBCDF I ADEF) I ABCE BCDF ADEF A BCE ABCDF DEF B ACE CDF ABDEF AB CE ACDF BDEF C ABE BDF ACDEF AC BE ABDF CDEF BC AE DF ABCDEF ABC E ADF BCDEF ABCDE BCF AEF AD BCDE ABCF EF BD ACDE CF ABEF ABD CDE AC F BEF CD ABDE BF ACEF ACD BDE ABF CEF BCD ADE 1F ABCEF ABCD DE AF BCEF A: Voltage B: Temperature C: Concentration D: Flour Type E: Oil Type F: Moisture Content 1 21 TABLE 4.3. SS VALUES FOR COMPLETE FRACTIONAL DESIGN OF FLOUR/OIL DATA. 17 at 0.08 rpm 1) at 2.0 rpm Treatments Est. Effects SS Est. Effects SS 1 42.8 2.2 ae 61.9 15330.1 1.9 13.9 bef -48.3 9316.0 -1.8 12.4 abf -57.5 13240.9 -l.7 12.2 cef 34.8 4830.7 2.2 . 18.8 acf 42.5 7213.6 1.2 6.2 bc -58.7 13805.3 -2.2 19.2 abce -45.3 8224.0 -1.5 8.6 2 df -27.7 3072.9 -0.6 1.6 adef ~19.2 1479.2 -O.9 3.0 bde 4.9 96.0 0.3 0.3 abd 16.1 1040.8 0.8 2.4 cde -20.4 1658.7 -0.4 0.7 acd -32.1 4114.9 -l.2 5.8 bcdf 45.1 8121.9 1.5 9.6 abcdef 35.5 5029.6 1.3 7.3 SS(A...ABCD) 91418.8 1 13.7 1 22 TABLE 4.4. SS PERCENTAGES FOR DESIGN EFFECTS AND ALIASES OF FLOUR/01L DATA. 1] at 0.08 rpm 1] at 2.0 rpm Cumulative Cumulative Effects ALIAS ALIAS ALIAS SS% °/o 88% % ABD CDE ACF BEF ACD BDE ABF CEF A BCE ABCDF DEF 16.8 16.8 12.3 12.3 BC AE DF ABCDEF 15.1 31.9 16.9 29.1 AB CE ACDF BDEF 14.5 46.4 10.7 39.8 B ACE CDF ABDEF 10.2 56. 5 10.9 50.7 ABC E ADF BCDEF 9.0 65.5 7.5 58.2 BCD ADE F ABCEF 8.9 74.4 8.4 66.7 AC BE ABDF CDEF 7. 9 82.3 5 . 5 72. 1 ABCD DE AF BCEF 5.5 87.8 6.4 78. 5 C ABE BDF ACDEF 5.3 93.1 16.6 95.1 D ABCDE BCF AEF 3.4 96.5 1.4 96.5 CD ABDE BF ACEF 1.8 98.3 0.6 97.] AD BCDE ABCF EF 1.6 99.9 2.7 99.8 BD ACDE CF ABEF 0. 1 100.0 0.2 100.0 1 23 TABLE 4.5. OVERALL RANKING OF EFFECTS AND ALIASES OF FLOUR/OIL DATA. RANK RANK Effects ALIAS ALIAS ALIAS ADD OVERALL 0.08 rpm 2.00 rpm RANKS RANK ABD CDE ACF BEF ACD BDE ABF CEF 2 1 BC AE DF ABCDEF 3 1 1 3 A BCE ABCDF - DEF 4 2 3 5 AB CE ACDF BDEF 8 3 4 4 B ACE CDF ABDEF 8 3 9 2 ABE BDF ACDEF l 1 5 5 7 ABC E ADF BCDEF 12 6 6 6 BCD ADE F ABCEF 12 6 7 9 AC BE ABDF CDEF 16 8 8 8 ABCD DE AF BCEF 16 8 l 0 1 1 D ABCDE BCF AEF 2 1 10 12 10 AD BCDE ABCF EF 22 1 1 11 12 CD ABDE BF ACEF 23 12 1—1 DJ 13 13 BD ACDE CF ABEF 26 1 24 each of the 16 treatments, the transformed data were randomly distributed with a homogeneous variance. Table 4.6 is the ANOVA table for the five main effects and their interactions. The F-statistic is used to reveal the significance of the efi‘ects and their relative contributions to the response variable, apparent viscosity. The F—statistic is a computed by the following expression: = 83/1 df F SSE [4. 1] / 48 df The error sum of the squares (SSE) is the pooled variations fiom the 16 total treatments with four observations on each, accounting for 48 ( = 16 x (4-1)) degrees of fieedom, representing a measure of the variation within samples. From the F distribution, the total area under the curve is represented as 1.00. The p-value is the area under the curve to the right of the F value for this distribution at 1 and 48 degrees of freedom Therefore, the larger the p-value, the more insignificant the effect. For this analysis, the effect is considered statistically significant for p-values less than 0.01. Four effects are recognized as insignificant at each viscometer speed (boxed numbers in Table 4.6). Of the four effects, three are common to each speed: BCFEAEF, EFEABCF, and ACFEBEF So, the two three-letter interactions are noted as having no effect on the response. Because four-letter interactions are deemed insignificant fiom the outset of the study, the 125 8.8 8... new: 8 8.. 8 88 ummm -m. 2 .3 2 2.8. 1:8 ”mom a... 8... 8.8 .3 8... 8.8 No: 8... who .88.. .509... .— 8... 3.8 8.2 8... 8... 8.8 8.: 8.. 8.. "Eu ":2 8... 8.8 .2 8...- 8... 2.: P... 2...- 2. .39.. mm 8.8 2.2 a... 2 .o 18... m3 .8... 2 .o 8 "am .5... 8... 7m... 8... 8... m- 18... 8... Na... 3 .o- a. 8mm... .6 8... 8.8 8.~ $8- 1 8... 8.8. 8.2 8...- 2. .65.. mm 8... 8... 8.8 8... 8... 8... 8... w. .o 8.. Ed mom 8... R. 8.8 8.8 ..... 8... a... 8... :8- .. 03. a 8... 8.: NS. .8- 8... as... 82 8.8- 8.... m... on 8.8 8...: 8.: 3.8- 8... ~38 a: m :2- 2. mm 3. 8... L... .m 2 .o 8... 8... 8.8 82 :8 8.. m3. 0 8... 8.8.. an: 8... 8... o. .2 o. .. 8... .80 mo 9.. 8.8 8.8. 8..” 8...- 8... 8...: 8.2 8..- 8.. mu... m 8.8 8.8 8.. 8...- 8... 5% 3m 8...- .2. mum < 8... 8.8. on... X... 8.8 8...? 8.. N 2 ._ 2. mom... _ .2. SN . ms: 900:”.— 0=_B>IQ mm mm 300:“ Jam 0:—3>A— “— wm auuum Jam uflflaaafihr—t Ea... QN «a c. an.— wcd an r .<._.<: dawn—DOA...— EO mZC—PUém—PZ— INA—flaw IHBCA GZ< mFUHhhH 23.2 E flOh max—mgr <>OZ< 6.9 Eda—(h. 1 26 EF interaction (oil type - moisture content) is the only two-letter interaction throughout the analysis not to impact ER activity. Only one three-letter interaction had an efl‘ect on the ER response, ABFECEF. A noteworthy finding involves comparisons between F-values for the two viscometer speeds. At the faster speed, 2 rpm, the fluid concentration was clearly more critical to the response than at 0.08 rpm. This fact may be ermlained by analyzing the shear-thinning behavior of ER fluids. A shear-thinning fluid displays a decreasing apparent viscosity with an increasing shear rate. As the shearing (speed) is increased, the degree of particle interaction and contact is heightened, ultimately interfering with flow behavior of the suspension. An analogy can be drawn using a dance floor. When the dancers are sparse, paralleling a low solid concentration, couples can move with ease. However, as the concentration of dancers increase, the ability for the partners to move gracefully becomes increasingly diflicult. Similarly, the inhibition of fluids to flow at greater speeds is magnified with larger volume fractions. Another interesting F-value comparison involves the voltage effect, A. At the lower shear rate, the F-value for effect A is 334.24, while at the higher shear rate, the F- value is 138.38. Hence, the voltage is clearly a more important factor at lower speeds. Referring again to the Mason number (Mn), lower shear rates correspond to lower values of Mn. Findings fiom this study support the notion that voltage effects are more significant for lower values of Mn. 1 27 To demonstrate the five variable interactions more clearly, Figures 4.6 and 4.7 graphically depict the apparent viscosities for each viscometer speed considered. The main axes of the cube incorporate the variables A, B, and F (voltage, temperature, and moisture content). Low and high levels for the variables are considered as: A (voltage) increasing from left to right, B (temperature) increasing fiom fiont to back, and F (moisture content) increasing from bottom to top. At every corner of the three- dimensional cubes are two-dimensional squares of the remaining variables, C and E (concentration and oil type). The low and high variables are expressed similarly to the main axes, where: C (concentration) increases fiom left to right, and E (oil type) changes fiom bottom to top. Table 3.2 provides a listing of each variable and their experimental values. The averaged apparent viscosities for each factor combination are placed at the proper position on the statistical cube. According to Table 4.6, two two-level interactions, temperature - concentration (BC) and electric field - temperature (AB), were found to have a large impact on the ER response at each shear rate. Observations fiom multiple-variable interactions are made for each figure. For Figure 4.6 at 0.08 rpm, when the temperature effect (B) was low (25 °C), corresponding to the front face of the statistical cube, the concentration (C) had a large effect on the apparent viscosity; the opposite holding true when the temperature was in the high position (50 °C), corresponding to the back wall of the cube. When the temperature factor (B) was low, the electric field (A) had a positive efl‘ect on the apparent viscosity; however, when the temperature was high, the electric field had little effect on the ER response. Of the 16 treatments, the five largest viscosities occurred in the presence of the 128 .<...<.. 4.2.53... .5 2.... 8... .5. .. ze WEE... 22555.2. :2... 3.2.55 75.: 97.355 .259 45.5.3.5 ..... .3. .0... :5an 9.5.82). u..— o..... .5 a. 55.2.5280 ”U oaaaeoafiufi 5 as; 3. mbé — u and < \IIIIIIII4I¢I\III...H IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIImu. I a I s o I I I I I A I I I I c I I U . O . n I I I . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r I I I I c s I I I I I I I I \ a I I I I I I l I I O I O \ I I I I I . . C I . L .I ........................... I I I I I I I I .H+3..........H.....”...H.3.......3.”“.33.. a s I I . . , o .. s o I I I I I I I .I I I I I I l I . O O I I I I I I I I , I I I II C I I I I I I I I s a q I I o x I s I I a I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I H I I end .. I II bud .. .. I \ oI II . II II II vI II;\I\IIIs..u. . II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII. I I I V O I I II I t I C . . .I I I s I I I I. C O a I I I t I I w I II mac 8 I I I I I III. . . .. I . I I I QVIQ: \ O H I . .. I I .. I . . I I I I asiswscIIIIIIaIIsuwu IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIHHH“ cm.” Vbdm 129 4.5... £9.53... .5 2.... 3 ...< .. ze mama—hm 7.6—ng2 GZ< Eda—$145 ES UEBOIm mam—DU A=G1 38.50 9.5.8.82 25 .5 nozaheooueu 9.39.2. 80,—. INS—.5 4 \II\.I\¢IIIIIIIIIEH IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII.“ E .6... .U: I) I I I I II «I. I I II II I I I I IIIIIIIIIIII 1 30 high voltage, with all but one of these five viscosities occurring while the moisture content (P) was at the greater value (12.9%). Similar results were obtained at 2 rpm (Figure 4.7). While the temperature was in the low position, the larger concentration created greater apparent viscosities. However, when the temperature was high, the concentration had inconclusive effects on the viscous response. The largest viscosities were recorded when concentration and voltage were in the high positions for the lower temperature condition. Nevertheless, the eight averaged viscosities were larger for temperatures of 50 °C opposed to the eight averaged viscosities for 25 °C. By comparing the high moisture viscosity values (12.9%) with the low moisture values (6.4%), the higher moisture invoked a greater viscosity in each case but 0116. Comparison of the two cubes finds the largest viscosities recorded at the same cubic positions for each figure. For each instance, these positions coincide with the larger voltage and concentration conditions for olive oil at the lower temperature setting. 4.3. 11 Groups Resulting from Dimensional Analysis Buckingham’s Theorem was applied to the list of ER variables, and the following dimensionless groups were defined: 111 = mc [4.2] Hz = ¢ [4.3] 113 = fl [4.4] IL = a. [4.5] 131 a? II a: 2 117 ___ 60E n. _ k8} Pprpg r1. _ 17.7 prpg -2 1' mm = 7 p 8 [4.6] [4.7] [4. 8] [4.9] [4.10] [4.11] Upon firrther inspection of the H groups, some basic relationships among primary forces involved with ER were revealed. l'I groups 7 - 10 each represent a ratio of an important force involved with ER activity to the gravitational force: Polarization Force n7 '3 . . Gravrtatronal Force H ___ Thermal Force 8 _ Gravitational Force 11 = Viscous Force 9 - Gravitational Force 11 _ Hydrodynamic (Inertial) Force 10 = Gravitational Force [4.12] [4.13] [4.14] [4.15] 1 32 It has already been noted that polar, thermal, and viscous forces are important in the ER phenomenon. However, 1110 the inertial force term, may also play a crucial role in predicting behavior. This group represents a kinetic energy term (mass 0 velocity’), and may be considered as a force imposed by a mass of fluid in motion. This force is different fiom the viscous force term, related to internal fluid forces resisting shear flow. Three major dimensionless groups have received much attention in ER literature, the Mason number (Mn), the Peclet number (Pe), and the 7» number (2.). Variables comprising these terms are taken from Table 2.2: 677,}? = Viscous Forces [4 16] 8:08.},(flE)2 Polarization Forces ' A _ ”soar: (.313)2 = Polarization Forces [4 l7] kBT Thermal Forces ° Pe = 67K: 77,7 = Viscous Forces [4.18] kBT — Thermal Forces From the current dimensional analysis, the 10 11 terms can be manipulated to generate the above groups: Mn = 6n;’r1;‘rl;‘rl, [4.19] ,1 = nflinfifig' [4.20] Pe = (Mn)(2) = sang‘n, [4.21] 133 Several variables remain uniform and are replaced with constant values for the analysis. These variables include pp, p, , rp, 6,, g, and 1rB . P. was compared for olive and canola oil at the two experimental temperatures of 25 and 50 °C. Results validated that oil type and temperature had no effect on the continuum density. Substituting the constants for the uniform variables gives the new groups: o:1 IT,5 cc 1; H6 =a6(l); 1'1:s = l—a—s—l [4.22] 117 at E2; l'I7 =a7 E2; 1'1'7 = I-gll [4.23] 7 1'18 0: T; 118 = 013 T; H; =|:I—:| [4.24] 11, cc 77.7; II. =0. 71.7; H; = IL]; [4.25] 1110 at 72; 11,0 =a10j/2; 11:0 = '23 [4.26] These newly formed 11' groups, along with the previously mentioned groups (I'll-1'15), serve as the basic terms for the analysis. The common ER dimensionless groups (Mn, Pe, and 2.) are adjusted to consider the variables remaining unchanged throughout the analysis. These terms are distinguished with a prime (') symbol. . 77.7 II/ 71.7 , 152 Mnoc 9 ,; Mn=a ; Mn=— 4.27 1'17 Mn E2 laml [ 1 134 E2 n' E2 ’1— ,1 /.; 2:0. —; 2'=— 4.28 m Us A. T lall [ 1 . . 0.? 1'1/ 77.7 . T P 0: 9 ,; Pe=a ; Pe = 4.29 e H. p, T lap, [ 1 Additional inspection of the 11 groups lead to the identification of another popular dimensionless number, the Reynolds Number (Re). Reynolds Number is a ratio comparing the inertial to viscous components, and provides an indication of fluid flow regions: laminar, turbulent, or transitional This term is beneficial for classifying flow regimes where sedimentation may be encountered with ER suspensions. The Reynolds group is defined as L I ' 2 Re cc [1%, ; Re: am —7—,; Re' = i [4.30] 9 ”c lake 4.3.1. Prediction Equations Flour/Oil. Dimensional analysis was applied to the flour/oil data to gain insight into the ER behavior of milk chocolate and other fluids. Ten dimensionless groups were developed to describe the ER response of flour/oil suspensions, with the viscosity ratio, ’7 77 , serving as the dependent variable. The remaining IT groups were regressed, using 1 35 Microsoft Excel (Redmond, WA) software, to determine the following prediction equation: H5 ___ e4488.43ni.73n§.29n;158.44n;133.361-I;0.34n;-864.96n;-124.94n$2.09 [431] 01' %c = e4488.43(mc)l.73 (¢)0.29(fl)-158.44(gc )-133.46 . .. (E2 )0.34 (T)-864.96(17c}', )-124.94 (7 2 )62.09 [432] r2 for this expression is 0.80. Figure 4.8 shows the actual and predicted viscosity ratios for the flour/oil data plotted against Mn'. This plot also reveals trend lines representing regressions of the actual and predicted data. 1'1;I , a term proportional to temperature, had a very large exponent, -864.96. The variables 77c and a both considered temperature dependencies. Since temperature variations were considered in these variables, 11; was pulled from the dimensionless groups, and the analysis was rerun. The new prediction equation was found to be H, = 8407611138112.”Hg]0.12n;10.80n;0.34n;-3.45n;(1).34 [433] 01' %¢ = e-10.76(mc)l.38(¢)0.75(fi)—10.12(£c)-10.80(E2 )0.34(ncy)-3.45(7 2 )1.34 [434] 136 .<.—.<: dGJ—bGa—h 10.”— .:E 9» $\b EC mum-ix» AHA—Av: =Z $\b RC main—<5 AHA—O2 =Z< A mam—lbw gnaw—m mmfldZG—mZH—Z—G .36 .9: moflood gum—cod b Nd 3-95.? r ll ‘3. 956 Sam Roam 80323085 no-MOo.m - mcumgd - .mG—hg H3546> 3-95. _ co +mOo .c . L OO+MOO .o k \ u voflood \ r voflocé _. 3-95.0 .. 3.95.” r 8&5?— u 8&0”- 1 moms..— .. 8-95.— 4 8-m8._ 8&2: (.UW) (“l/ll) ssans mans ssaruotsuauuq I1 141 dOD—DSE Flaw—E: ht. Hhé gum—Hm mmHJZG—mZHE—A— m> mmmgm Mama—m mmm—HZG—WZHEG A u...» .9: 3-95.0 3.956 b moflooé n nus: 2mm 5% 3:2835 8-m8.m * moflood P 8&8.— [F .mghéflm—Zm—h 8+Mocd L U0 “N" \ 8+m8 .o \M: 3-m8.~ \ \ ‘ f 3&3“. r 3&006 r Sumac.» - 8&2: - mo-mo~._ I mafia?— . monmoc._ I 8&8.— 8&2: (.uw) (”h/h) mus mus mwowuawm 142 .mHZm—PZOU gum-OE dab—DOE— .PZm—y—E: H< Hhé gnaw—m mmHAZO—mz‘hg: 9» mmHEm gum—um mmmAZO—mZm—E: .26 .0: has: 29. Roam 82:05:08.0 moans: 3&8.“ 3&8... 3-m8.m 3-m8.~ 8-moo._ 8+m8.o - n r p r b 8+moo.o \ T 3.95.“ gonna:— . \. .. . \. r395... I \ I I I I I ‘11 II I I II I I I- ..Iu...| .3-m8.e m <§_ nos .m. m. 0 . 3&8.” m. S u. 1 8-95.. m E m x V 8-mo~._ M m r 8-m$._ m . 8&3... I 8&3. moumooa 1 43 greater than the response at 20% concentration. In addition, Figure 4.11 efl‘ectively shows the strong efl‘ect temperature plays in ER At higher temperatures, the ER activity is stronger, due to increased polarization and particle mobility coupled with a decrease in continuum viscosity. Figure 4.12 illustrates the role water plays in ER It has been well documented that moisture increases ER activity and is often a requirement for many ER fluids. For the flour/oil data, two moisture levels of 12.9% and 6.4% (% water on a dry basis) were compared. As expected, the higher moisture content promoted ER activity. However, the enhancement was not as significant as one might expect. At 50% total moisture content, ER activity of flour is slightly diminished. The lack of impact on the ER response may be supported by examining the statistical analysis, where moisture content ranked fifih of the six primary factors for significance on ER activity (see Table 4.5). An interesting observation from Figures 4.10 and 4.11 is that in each graph, the variable changes are characterized by lines running non-parallel to one another. Parallel lines would indicate that the ER variables, volume fraction and temperature, do not interact with Mn' , the independent variable. Therefore, ER variable efl‘ects from volume fraction and temperature are influenced by changes in Mn’. For example, as Mn' is increased, the larger volume fraction line shows a growing significance, 'Le., volume fraction has a greater importance at higher Mn' values. Similar observations can be made for temperature effects. Figure 4.12, however, shows two lines running fairly parallel 1 44 through the Mn' range due to the influence of moisture content. This means moisture content changes do not interact with Mn’. 4.3.3. H Group Analysis % Vs Mn' . Much ER literature has been dedicated to studying the relationship between the Mn and the viscosity ratio. Equations 2.12 and 2.13 are equations representing this relationship, where the values for K and Mn‘“ are suspension dependent. Log-log plots of the viscosity ratio against the Mn are characterized by a linear portion with a negative slope for lower values of Mn. As Mn increases, the viscous efl‘ects begin to dominate the response causing the graph to tail and approach a constant value corresponding to 77% . In other words, the electric field has no efl‘ect on the fluid with large shear fields causing the viscosity to approach that of an unelectrified suspension. This study also examined the aforementioned relationship. Figures 4.13 and 4.14 show curves for 7% Vs Mn' for flour/oil and milk chocolate, respectively. A best fit power law curve was calculated for the flour/oil data and applied to the milk chocolate graph (Fig. 4.14). At the highest milk chocolate temperature - when the carrier medium (cocoa butter) behavior was Newtonian - the data corresponded well with the flour/oi] best fit line. 145 .325 defined me... a: as .i. .5 Hz: E SE. c7535 .54.. amaze—mass: .2412... .52 oo+m8._ 5&2: «ohm—co. _ mo-moo. _ 3-95.— mo-moo. _ oofloog 8&2: 8&2: mofloog P P P h n n b L! °°+moo. — I _o+m_oo._ I 8&8.— °lt/lt f mo+moo._ u 3+mOo. _ dODSO: mo+moo.— _ 146 .<.H<= aGEDGu—h EOE HZ—A E Emma Huh. It; laugh—ZOO Zn $\t EC malnu— E Emma QZ—BOEW #64: mmHflZO—mZm—Ea .26 .6: bl oo+m_oo. _ Sfloc. _ Sumac. _ mo-moc. _ games. _ 8-95. _ cofioo. _ . a . . » oo+moog -_o+moog rNo+mo04 .u w Tmo+moo; uvo+mOo4 £02304.”— 0 wo+Moog 151 oo+MocA 4.5... 4.8.83... 28.... HE... .E. 8.... map E...» 28.53.28 7.. <8... .8388... v5.2 .5... .9. a. .8 a... 5.... 83582.8... .8... d... hm 8&8. 8&8. 8&8. 8&8. 8&8. 8&8. . . . . » 8&8. . 8&8. . 8&8. 58 .682. 52. 2.... E .QO u T 8&8. W . n . o a u o 8 o o «o 00 o” o / a on o / . 8&8. .0 mo 0 .vu“ 0 0" M. m o . . o o 8&8 . a ESOOOEU Mum: vo+mao. 152 fl.‘ .<.—.<: $623915 19.— .ofl m> “bk. hO HE‘— E Emma UZ—BOIm HOx—h mmHAZO—mZH—EA— Km... .9: .3. 8&8. 8&8. 8&8. . 8&8. _ 8&8. . . . . 8&8. - 8&8. T 8&8. .u/ m . 8&8. . 8&8. .5220... o no+moo._ 1 53 rate increases, the ability to destroy ER microstructures is greater, as shown by the decreasing apparent viscosity ratio with increasing Re' . A power law relationship was applied to calculate the best-fit representation for the milk chocolate data and placed on Figure 4.18. Once again, the best-fit line captured the trend for milk chocolate at the highest temperature, 40.6 °C. Large deviations from the line are experienced for the other milk chocolate experimental temperatures. For the lowest temperature, 35 °C, it appeared that larger viscosities were achieved for the higher shear rates. Again, the temperature dependent nature of the carrier medium may be responsible for this unexpected behavior of ER fluids. Re’ Vs Pe' . Figure 4.19 shows a graph portraying the ratio of inertial to viscous effects against the ratio of viscous to thermal forces. A qualitative analysis finds the Re' increasing linearly with Pe' . As the thermal efl‘ects become more dominant, corresponding to lower values of Pe' , the viscous portion of Re' is more dominant. Lower values of Re' are accompanied by either larger temperatures or a less viscous continuum A best-fit line was taken from Figure 4.19 and applied to milk chocolate in Figure 4.20. As observed from earlier figures, the best-fit curve represents the milk chocolate response at the highest experimental temperature. Likewise, deviations from this curve were seen for lower temperatures, when the continuum behaved as a shear-thinning liquid. 154 .<._. #8.. may #6:: mme—ZO—mZH—E: .26 .9: .3. 8&8. 8&8. 8&8. 8&8. 8&8. 8&8. 8&8. 8&8. 8&8. 8&8. . p P F . p p - NCumOO.— o u a u . 8&8. . o 0.88"... a o o o “A. W 0 O O a o a .8&8. . 8&8. . 3 u 0 / ouuoumooummo m O «o o o o o . . 8&8. a o u... fink / u . Z O. O //o m o r8&8. 1k 58 .582". as". 8.. E .QO f 8&8. E50820 v3.2 firm—co.— 155 .<.H .9: ha Faun: mmmAZO—mZH—Ea .cN... .0: .8 8&8. 8&8. 8&8. 8&8. 8&8. 8&8. 8&8. P . r . . 8&8. o u. 88“.. . 8&8. O o .. 8&8. O O 0. «fine . 8&8 . O O O o . 8&8. o u. 98”.. - O I I . o o o 8 m8 . O O O O o o o . 8&8. O. O \ O \\ o . . e o \\x\ 8&8 . O O \\\\ o \\ 58 .582. as. 8.. E a... \\ . 8&8. 8.5828 .82 \xx mo+&88. 1 57 4.4. Thermal Enhancement of Milk Chocolate Equation 3.12 was programmed into an Excel spreadsheet program This equation, along with recorded temperatures and the heat flux, allowed for estimation of the thermal parameters. The values of k and pcp producing the lowest sum of the squares when comparing the actual to theoretical temperatures were selected as the optimal values. Figure 4.21 shows a typical comparison of actual and theoretical temperatures to confirm that the predictive model accurately represented the actual time - temperature ‘ relationship found in the sample. Figure 4.22 displays the temperature residuals at the boundaries of the chocolate sample. When the differences are the smallest at each location, the predicted heat transfer properties most accurately reflect the experimental values. From Figure 4.22, the theoretical and experimental data are at the best fit between 45 and 145 seconds. A "mirror image" concept was used to predict the thermal conductivities of milk chocolate with and without the presence of an electric field. A total number of 18 tests were performed (Table 4.8). Of the 18 experiments, 11 tests were run without an applied field, yielding an average conductivity of 0. 158 W m'1K'l (standard deviation equals 0.027 W m'lK'l). Five tests were operated with 300 Volts mm'1 across the chocolate sample, giving an average conductivity of 0. 175 W m"l('l (standard deviation equals 0.013 W m'lK'l). Further measurements were collected at 450 Volts mm'l yielding an average conductivity of 0. 159 W m"K". 158 O 2., 0 Actual (Z=0) 0 E 0 Actual (2:1,) a Cl Theoretical (Z=0) .5, A Theoretical (Z=L)J {- 20 T 10 ~f~ I I 0 i . T. T i 0 50 100 150 200 Time (5) FIG. 4.21. TRANSIENT BOUNDARY TEMPERATURES OF MILK CHOCOLATE: COMPARISON OF ACTUAL AND THEORETICAL TEMPERATURES. 159 2.5 + Difl‘erence (Z=0) 2 + + Difi'erence (Z=L) é: —3— Average Difl‘erence 8 C E 1.5 i .5 2 3 S 8. n E U 0 {- 150 180 FIG. 4.22. MILK CHOCOLATE BOUNDARY TEMPERATURE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ACTUAL AND THEORETICAL VALUES. = 1 60 TABLE 4.8. THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY (W m'IK'l) OF MH.K CHOCOLATE EXPOSED TO VARYING ELECTRIC FIELDS. 0 Volts mm" 300 Volts mm'1 450 Volts mrn'l 0.150 0.163 0.160 0.150 0.159 0.158 0.151 0.185 0.1 18 0.185 0.127 0.182 0.194 0.184 0.177 0.185 0.180 n 11 5 2 T 0.158 0.175 S 0.027 0.013 161 The sample means for the conductivities at 0 and 300 volts were 0.158 and 0.175 W m’lK'l, respectively. The t distribution test statistic, with a 95% confidence interval and 14 degrees of freedom, was equal to 2.14. For our sample averages, ttest equals 1.32. Since ttest was less than 2.14, the voltage was considered to have no significant effect on the thermal conductivity. Therefore, the mean value of k was calculated from all 18 experiments, 0.163 W m"K'l (standard deviation equals 0.023 W m'1K"). A possible explanation for the lack of impact an electric field has on the directional heat transfer is that milk chocolate has a very high volume fraction of particulates. Although an electric field affects the rheology of milk chocolate, the microstructures do not provide noticeable increases in the rate of heat transfer. Published values for the thermal conductivity for milk chocolate were not found. Equation 2.26 produced a conductivity of 0. 195 W m"K". This value gives approximately 16% error between the estimated value and the number calculated with the compositional model Compositional and chemical variations in food systems as well as procedural inconsistencies may be responsible for the deviation. According to Sweat (1986), the recommended method for determining thermal diffusivity, a, is to calculate it from experimentally derived values of conductivity (k), specific heat (cp), and mass density (p), where a = .13. [4.39] 1 62 According to Zhang and Lloyd (1993) the specific heat and density do not appear to be affected by the application of an electric field. The MIM produced specific heats ranging from 1.85 to 2.63 k] kg'l K'1 with an average value of2. 14 kJ kg'1 1('1 (standard deviation equals 0.27 1d kg'1 [(1). Density of milk chocolate, determined as 1.24 g cm’3, lead to an average thermal diffusivity of 6.32 x 10'8 m2 5'1 (standard deviation equals 1.46 x 10'8 m2 s") for the milk chocolate. Chocolate diffusivity data were also not available, but comparison to known diffusivity values of other food materials (such as 7.90 x 10'8 m2 s'l for butter between 30 and 60 °C) reported by Choi and Okos (1986) show that the magnitude of the estimated value is reasonable. W Four objectivesof this research were identified in the first chapter: 1) To thoroughly evaluate the literature in electrorheology and milk chocolate rheology; and to evaluate the effects of shear fields and temperature on the flow behavior of milk chocolate in the presence of an electric field. 2) To investigate the importance of six primary ER variables, and their interactions with each other by studying model ER fluids composed of difi‘erent flour and vegetable oil suspensions. 3) To employ dimensional analysis to develop prediction equations for describing the ER phenomenon, linking interactions among electrical, thermal, viscous, and hydrodynamic forces in food systems. 4) To describe the ‘Mrror-Image—Method” for measuring thermal properties of molten milk chocolate; and to evaluate the thermal conductivity of molten milk chocolate with and without electric field effects. The following conclusions, addressing each objective, are made. 5.1. Electrorheological Behavior of Milk Chocolate This research demonstrates that milk chocolate has the unique characteristics associated with ER fluids. The yield stress and apparent viscosity are functions of the applied electric field, each increasing with electric field intensity. Temperature enhances the ER response. At constant shear and electric fields, the apparent viscosity increases 163 1 64 with temperature, behavior typical of ER fluids but unexpected for milk chocolate. However, atypical behavior was found to occur at higher temperatures and electric fields. This deviation from a normal ER response may be attributed to the polymorphic behavior of liquid cocoa butter. Difl‘erent factions of the cocoa butter fat are known to melt at different temperatures. Some of the lipid components are known to consist of polar groups, and when these fats melt and become part of the canier medium, the dielectric constant of the liquid fat increases. This results in loss of the desirable, nonpolar liquid phase, and consequentially, the ER response of milk chocolate. The role of cocoa butter in the ER response needs additional research. 5.2. Investigation of Variables Influencing ER Behavior Fractional factorial designs are useful for screening large numbers of variables during the early stages of study. A 2"2 fractional factorial design was performed on six ER variables: electric field, temperature, concentration, flour type, oil type, and moisture content. Initial statistical analysis revealed that one of the variables, flour type, was insignificant to experimental outcomes. The oil type, however, was shown to have significance on the response. This may be due to differences between rheological properties of canola and olive oil in the unelectrified state. The flour type variable was removed from the analysis, and an AN OVA was performed to demonstrate significance levels for the remaining variables and interactions. Each of the remaining variables were ranked according to significance to the ER response in the following order: voltage, temperature, concentration, oil type, and moisture content. 1 65 The voltage effect was wimessed to play a more dominating role in the ER response for the lower shear rate region, while the concentration effect was more critical to the phenomenon at higher shear rates. Temperature showed a similar importance to ER activity regardless of the shearing speed. Multiple variable interactions, such as temperature - concentration and electric field - temperature, also showed importance to the ER phenomenon. Results from this statistical study effectively characterized interactions of, and between, variables for the ER phenomenon. 5.3. Dimensional Analysis of the ER Phenomenon After completing the statistical analysis, the flour/oil data were transformed into ten dimensionless terms called I'I groups. These terms were regressed to develop a relationship between the dependent group, a viscosity ratio ( 17/ 77. ), and the remaining independent H groups, leading to development of the following equation having an r2 value of0.74: %c = e-10.76(mc)1.38(¢)0.75(fl)-10.12(8c)-10.80(E2)0.34(nc)'/)-3.45(}',2)l.34 [5 1] Applying a slightly modified form of this flour/oil based equation to milk chocolate data gave: % =e151.93(E2)o.i7(T)-26.i9(m};)-1.02(};2)o.22 [5.2] with an r2 value of 0.99. In general, dimensional analysis proved an excellent numerical method for developing prediction equations among ER variables. 1 66 5.4. Thermal Properties of Milk Chocolate An electric field of up to 450 Volts mrn‘l at 60 Hz did not produce a statistically significant enhancement of heat transfer in milk chocolate. The "Mirror Image Method" proved to be a quick and practical technique for measuring heat transfer parameters of fluid foods. The average thermal conductivity and thermal difiirsivity of molten milk chocolate over a temperature range of 30 to 60 °C was 0.163 W m'1K'l and 6.32 x 10’8 m2 s", respectively. 5.5. Future Research Future study of ER fluid foods should involve three general areas of research. The first area should be the identification of ER food systems in addition to milk chocolate. Food components, solid or liquid, may contribute to ER activity. However, multi- composite food materials, such as milk chocolate, need to be identified. These systems will be suspensions with a high fat and low moisture content. Another area of study should be the development of analytical techniques to separate, or identify, components based on dielectric properties. Although this technology may not be used to difi’erentiate flour types, other applications may still exist. ER, for example, might be used to maintain and stabilize suspensions or, to rapidly determine moisture levels of flours. The final area of research should be the continued research of ER in fluid milk chocolate. This material responds as a strong ER fluid, showing dramatic increases to yield stress and apparent viscosity with an electric field. The electrorheological response 1 67 of milk chocolate creates unique opportunities to improve product and process development. Traditionally, the flow behavior of milk chocolate is controlled by changing composition and temperature. Recognizing milk chocolate as an ER fluid allows for the control of flow behavior with the application of an external voltage. For example, the ER valve could find a home in a chocolate processing plant. A valve with no moving parts would be beneficial to the food industry because it could be cleaned without disassembly. The chocolate industry, having an ER material requiring no additional development, is a prime target for ER applications. Additional research should examine the effects of changing the protein environment, manipulating the polar nature of the milk proteins, on the ER response of milk chocolate. Once the primary components for ER in milk chocolate are identified, simple model systems could be designed and studied. This system could be analyzed at different pH levels and temperatures. Changes in pH and temperature will either increase or decrease the polar nature of the proteins, resulting in changes in ER activity. From this analysis, the mechanism of the ER phenomenon in milk chocolate could be better understood. Another idea for firture study involves the coupling of ER measurements with analytical techniques, such as differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), to further qualify the phenomenon. It is believed that the polymorphic behavior of cocoa butter is responsible for the erratic ER response displayed by milk chocolate at higher temperatures. In other words, at higher temperatures, the more polar lipid crystals of cocoa butter are melting and contributing to the continuous phase, leading to a loss of the |u 1 68 nonpolar requirement by the liquid phase. DSC permits one to monitor physicochemical transitions of solid cocoa butter as the temperature is increased This technique could assist in understanding how the polymorphic behavior of the milk chocolate continuum influences ER activity. Through chemistry and electricity, ER technology could ultimately permit additional control over the flow behavior of milk chocolate. WA Dimensional Analysis Tables. FLOUR/OH. DIMENSIONLESS GROUPS. 169 TABLE A.1. 71/7]. mc ¢ 8c p 117' ns' [19' 1110' 95.1 1 1.00 0.40 3.15 0.20 1.60E+05 2.98E+02 5.77E-01 7658-1-01 173.61 1.00 0.40 3.15 0.20 1.60E+05 2.98E+02 2.89E-01 1.91E+01 350.20 1.00 0.40 3.15 0.20 1.60E-l-05 2.98E+02 1.445-01 4.7SE+00 439. 76 1.00 0.40 3.15 0.20 1.60E+05 2.98E+02 1.15E-01 3.06E-l-00 930.18 1.00 0.40 3.15 0.20 1.60E+05 2.98E+02 5.77E-02 7.645-01 1873.84 1.00 0.40 3.15 0.20 1.60E+05 2.98E+02 2.88E-02 1.9lE-01 3745.41 1.00 0.40 3.15 0.20 1.60E+05 2.98E+02 1.45E-02 4.80E-02 4615.5 8 1.00 0.40 3. 15 0.20 1.60E+05 2.98E+02 1. l6E-02 3.06E-02 9254.88 1.00 0.40 3.15 0.20 1.60E+05 2.98E+02 5.74E-03 7.57E-03 18546. 21 1.00 0.40 3. 15 0. 20 1.60E+05 2. 98E+02 2. 90E-03 1.94E-03 37044.00 1.00 0.40 3.15 0.20 1.60E+05 2.98E+02 1.455-03 4.84E-04 5.71 1.00 0.20 3.15 0.20 1.00E+04 2.98E+02 5.77E-01 7.65E+01 7.64 1.00 0.20 3.15 0.20 1.00E+04 2.98E+02 2.89E-01 1.91E+01 1 1.66 1.00 0.20 3. 15 0.20 1.00E+04 2.98E+02 1.44E-01 4755-1-00 12.97 1.00 0.20 3.15 0.20 1.00E+04 2.98E+02 1.155-01 3.06E+00 29.86 1.00 0.20 3.15 0.20 1.00E+04 2.98E+02 5.77E-02 7645-01 33.81 1.00 0.20 3.15 0.20 1.00E+04 2.98E+02 2.88E-02 1.91E-01 56.89 1.00 0.20 3.15 0.20 l.OOE+04 2.98E+02 1.4SE-02 4.80E-02 67.90 1.00 0.20 3.15 0.20 1.00E+04 2.98E+02 1.16E-02 3065-02 119.15 1.00 0.20 3. 15 0.20 1.00E+04 2.98E+02 5.74E-03 7.57E-03 192.59 1.00 0.20 3.15 0.20 1.00E+04 2.98E+02 2.9OE-03 1.945-03 403.98 1.00 0.20 3. 15 0.20 1.00E+04 2.98E+02 1.455-03 4.84E-04 36.96 1.00 0.20 2.50 0.36 1.00E+04 3.23E+02 2.015-01 7.65E+01 74.98 1.00 0.20 2.50 0.36 1.00E+04 3.23E+02 1.015-01 1.91E+01 147.67 1.00 0.20 2.50 0.36 1.00E+04 3.23E+02 5.01E-02 4.75E+00 200.15 1.00 0.20 2.50 0.36 1.00E+04 3.23E+02 4.025—02 3.06E+00 385.23 1.00 0.20 2.50 0.36 1.00E+04 3.23E+02 2.015-02 7.645-01 943.11 1.00 0.20 2.50 0.36 1.00E+04 3.23E+02 1.015-02 1.91E—01 1678.32 1981.76 3546.04 6728.04 13039.5] 3.97 5.51 9.25 10.67 13.31 38.34 51.50 58.78 106.28 161.03 345.51 4.42 6.92 10.89 9.38 16.70 20.76 32.94 63.53 119.12 173.53 353.66 44.10 87.28 172.16 221.48 455.58 943.57 1830.70 2260.10 4117.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 1 70 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 1.00E+04 LOOE+04 LO0E+04 LOOE+04 LOOE+04 LO0E+04 1.00E+04 1.00E+04 LO0E+04 LOOE+04 LO0E+04 LO0E+04 LO0E+04 1 .00E+04 LOOE+04 LO0E+04 1.60E+05 1 .60E+05 L60E+05 160E+05 1 .6OE+05 L60E+05 L60E+05 L6OE+05 L60E+05 l .60E+05 L60E+05 L60E+05 L60E+05 1 .60F.+05 1 .60E+05 L60E+05 l .60E+05 1 .60E+05 L60E+05 1 .6OE+05 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 5.04E-03 4.03E—03 2. DOE-03 1.01E-03 5.06E-04 5.77E-01 2. 8913-01 1.44E-01 l. lSE-Ol 5. 77E-02 2. 88E-02 1.45E-02 l. 16E-02 5. 74E-03 2. 9013-03 1 .45E—03 4.63E—01 2. 32E-01 1. l6E-01 9.27E-02 4. 63E—02 2. 32E-02 1. 16E-02 9.28E-03 4. 6 lE-03 2. 33E-03 l. l7E-O3 2. 27E-01 1. l4E-01 5. 67E-02 4.55E-02 2.27E-02 l. 14E-02 5.69E-03 4. SSE-03 2.26E-03 4.80E-02 3.0613-02 7.57E-03 1.94E-03 4. 8413-04 7.65E+01 1.91E+01 4.7SE+00 3.06E+00 7.64E-01 1.9lE-01 4.80E-02 3.06E-02 7.57E-03 1.94E-03 4. 84E-04 7.65E+01 1.91 E+01 4.75E+00 3.06E+00 7.6413-01 1.9lE-Ol 4.80E-02 3.06E-02 7.57E-03 1.94E-03 4. 8413-04 7.65E+01 1.91E+01 4.7SE+00 3.06E+00 7.64E-01 1.91E—01 4.80E-02 3.06E-02 7.57E-03 8104.32 16134.22 22.75 25.86 29.68 34.67 38.67 83.95 136.36 138.04 226.91 419.18 762.93 31.84 36.74 45.25 47.12 68.94 102.26 177.50 188.89 323.87 644.15 1331.60 22.62 42.20 84.05 107.13 212.38 460.82 965.38 1238.90 2515.42 5130.14 10813.31 53.11 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.20 0.20 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.20 0. 20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.40 3.15 3.15 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 3.15 1 71 0.27 0.27 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.27 L60E+05 L60E+05 LO0E+04 LOOE+04 LOOE+04 LOOE+04 1.00E+04 LO0E+04 1.00E+04 l.OOE+04 LO0E+04 1005-4-04 1.00E+04 LO0E+04 1.00E+04 LOOE+04 LO0E+04 1.00E+04 1.00E+04 1.00E+04 1 .00E+04 LO0E+04 1.00E+04 1.00E+04 1 .6OE+05 1 .6OE+05 L60E+05 l .60E+05 l .60E+05 l .6OE+05 l .GOE+05 1.60E+05 1.60E+05 1.60E+05 l .60E+05 LOOE+04 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 3.22E+02 3.22E+02 3.22E+02 3.22E+02 3.225+02 3.22E+02 3.22E+02 3,225+02 3.22E+02 3.22E+02 3.22E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 29884-02 2.9SE+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 3.23E+02 1. 14E-03 5. 72E-04 4. 63E—01 2. 325-01 1 . 16E-01 9. 27E-02 4. 63E—02 2. 32E-02 l . 16E-02 9.28E-03 4. 6 1 E-03 2. 33E—03 1 . l7E-O3 2.27E-01 l . l4E-01 5 . 67E-02 4. SSE-02 2. 27E-02 l . 14E-02 5 . 69E-O3 4. SSE-03 2. 26E-03 1 . 14E-03 5 . 72E-04 4. 63E-01 2. 32E-01 1 . 16E-01 9. 27E-02 4. 63E-02 2. 32E-02 l . 16E-02 9. 28E-03 4. 6 lE-03 2. 33E-03 l. l7E-03 2. 27E-01 1945-03 4.84E-04 7.65E+01 1.9lE+Ol 4.75E+00 3.06E+00 7 .6415—01 1.91E-01 4.80E-02 3.06E-02 7.57E-03 1.94E-03 4. 8413-04 7.65E+01 1.91E+01 4.75E+00 3.06E+00 7.6413-01 1.91E-01 4.8013-02 3061-3-02 7 .57E-03 1 9413-03 4.84E-04 7.65E+01 1.91E+01 4.75E+00 3.06E+00 7.64E-01 1.91E-01 48013-02 3.0613-02 7.57E-03 1941-3-03 4.84E-04 7 .6SE+01 63.35 79.19 92.52 104.29 147.80 207.53 247.43 395.32 665.31 1108.65 28.78 35.73 49.59 51.09 86.29 138.61 292.35 264.34 413.44 641.97 1234.13 15.76 21.90 37.44 32.66 59.47 89.52 215.80 271.95 500.66 927.08 1659.53 16.01 23.25 35.30 45.69 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 172 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 LOOE+04 LO0E+04 LOOE+04 LO0E+04 LO0E+04 LO0E+04 l .00E+04 LO0E+04 LO0E+04 LOOE+04 1 .60E+05 L60E+05 L608+05 L60E+05 L60E+05 L60E+05 160E+05 160E+05 160E+05 L60E+05 160E+05 LOOE+04 LO0E+04 100E+04 LOOE+04 100E+04 LO0E+04 LO0E+04 LO0E+04 100E+04 100E+04 LOOE+04 L60E+05 L60E+05 L60E+05 l .60E+05 3.23E+02 123E+02 3.23E+02 3.231902 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 123E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 123E+02 323E+02 3.23E+02 123E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 123B+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 123E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 1. l4E-01 5.67E-02 4.55E-02 2.27E-02 1. 14E-02 5.69E-03 4.55E-03 2.26E-03 1. l4E-03 5.72E-04 2.01E—01 1.01E-01 5.01E-02 4.02E-02 2.01E-02 1.01E-02 5.04E-03 4.03E-03 2.00E-03 1 .01E-03 5.06E-04 2.01 E-Ol 1.01E-01 5.01E-02 4.02E—02 2.01E-02 1.015-02 5.04E-03 4.03E-03 2.00E-03 1.01E-03 5.06E-04 2.27E-01 l. 14E-01 5.67E-02 4.55E-02 1.91E+01 4.75E+00 3.06E+00 7.645-01 1.91E-01 4.80E-02 30613-02 7.57E-03 1.94E-03 4.848-04 7.6SE+01 1.91E+01 4.7SE+00 3.06E+00 7.64E-01 1.91E-01 4.80E-02 3.06E-02 7.57E-03 1.94E-03 4.84E-04 7.6SE+01 1.9 l E+01 4.75E+00 3.06E+00 7.64E-01 1.9lE-Ol 4.80E-02 3.06E-02 7.57E-03 1.94E-03 4.84E-04 7.65E+01 1.91E+01 4.75E+00 3.06E+00 73.85 115.80 214.88 268.82 551.54 1075.38 2149.49 41.57 50.20 65.00 70.47 93.14 137.76 194.09 225.64 320.44 482.73 814.43 45.67 70.86 122.28 131.40 266.95 549.48 1203.69 1697.67 3956.43 8386.60 17010.28 53.68 69.48 91.89 97.67 136.49 204.49 382.12 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 3.15 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 173 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 160E+05 160E+05 L608+05 L6OE+05 L605+05 L60E+05 L605+05 LOOE+04 LOOE+04 LO0E+04 LOOE+04 LO0E+04 LO0E+04 LOOE+04 LOOE+04 100E+04 100E+04 LOOE+04 L60E+05 L60E+05 L60E+05 160E+05 160E+05 160E+05 L60E+05 L60E+05 L60E+05 L60E+05 L60E+05 LGOE+05 L60B+05 L60E+05 L60E+05 L60E+05 160E+05 L60E+05 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 2.98E+02 2.98£+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 2.98E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 3.23E+02 2.27E-02 l. 14E-02 5.69E-03 4.55E—03 2.26E-03 1. 14E-03 5 . 72B-04 4.63E-01 2. 32E-01 l. 16E-01 9.27E-02 4.63E-02 2. 32E-02 l. 16E-02 9.28E—03 4.61E-03 2. 33E-03 l. l7E-03 5.77E-01 2. 8913-01 1 .44E-01 1. 15E-01 5.77E-02 2. 88E—02 1 .45E-02 l. 16E-O2 5.74E—03 2. 90E-03 1 .45E-O3 2.01E-01 1.018-01 5.01E-02 4.02E-02 2.01E-02 1.01E-02 5.04E-03 7 .64E-01 1.91E-01 4.80E-02 3.06E-02 7.57E-03 1.94E-03 4.84E-04 7.65E+01 1.91E+01 4.75E+00 3.06E+00 7.64E-01 1.91E-01 4.80E-02 3.06E-02 7.57E-03 1.94E-03 4.84E-04 7.65E+01 1 .91E+01 4.75E+00 3.06E+00 7.64E-01 1.91E-01 4.80E-02 3.06E-02 7 5713-03 1.94E-03 4.84E-04 7.65E+01 1.9lE+01 4.7SE+00 3.06E+00 7.64E-01 1.91E-01 4.80E-02 354.12 439.46 584.88 897.58 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 174 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 1.60E+05 3.23E+02 1.60E+05 3.23E+02 1.60E+05 3 . 23E+02 1.60E+05 3 .23E+02 4.03E-03 2.00E-03 1.01E-03 50613-04 3.06E-02 7.57E-03 1 945-03 48413-04 1 75 TABLE A.2. MILK CHOCOLATE DIMENSIONLESS GROUPS. 71/ 77c 117' IL' 119' II:.' 0.06 1.00E+04 3.08E+02 9.18E+01 4. 84E-04 0.09 l .00E+04 3.08E+02 9.34E+01 1.94E-03 0. 11 1.00E+04 3.08E+02 9.50E+01 7.57E-03 0. l6 1.00E+04 3.08E+02 9.67E+01 3.06E-02 0.17 1.00E+04 3.08E+02 9.72E+01 4.80E-02 0.22 1.00E+04 3.08E+02 9.89E+01 1.91E-01 0.27 1.00E+04 3.08E+02 1.01E+02 7.64E-01 0.35 1.00E+04 3 .08E+02 1.02E+02 3 .06E+00 0.39 1.00E+04 3.08E+02 1.03E+02 4.78E+00 0.53 1.00E+04 3.08E+02 1.05E+02 1.91E+01 0.78 1.00E+04 3.08E+02 1.07E+02 7.6SE+01 51.71 1.00E+04 3.11E+02 1.01E-01 4.84E-04 52.16 1.00E+04 3.1 113-+02 1.50E-01 1.94E-03 42.25 1.00E+04 3.11E+02 2.23E-01 7.57E-03 38.03 1.00E+04 3.11E+02 3.35E-01 3.06E-02 37.35 1.00E+04 3.1 lE+02 3.81E-01 4.80E-02 31.03 1.00E+04 3.11E+02 5.69E-01 1.91E-01 26.16 1.00E+04 3.11E+02 8.51E-01 7.64E-01 22.87 1.00E+04 3.1 1E+02 1.27E+00 3.06E+00 22.40 1.00E+04 3. 1 IE+02 1.4SE+00 4.78E+00 21.17 1.00E+04 3.IIE+02 2.16E+00 1.91E+01 20.89 1.00E+04 3.1 1E+02 3.24E+00 7.65E+01 1236.36 l.OOE+04 3. 14E+02 3.30E-03 4. 84E-04 869. 70 1.00E+04 3. 14E+02 6. 60E-03 1.94E-03 560.92 1.00E+04 3.14E+02 1.31E—02 7.57E-03 378. 67 1.00E+04 3.14E+02 2. 63E-02 3.06E-02 335.16 1.00E+04 3.14E+02 3.29E-02 4.80E-02 208.09 1.00E+04 3.14E+02 6.56E-02 1.91E-01 132988 86.72 76.58 54.04 40.88 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.15 0.17 0.26 0.32 0.40 0.43 0.57 0.80 48.33 41.78 43.55 39.01 42.09 42.74 35.29 29.03 27.17 24.09 22.54 1318.18 672.73 384.67 303.24 319.63 268.80 194.51 126.55 106.31 l.OOE+04 1.00E+04 1.00E+04 1.00E+04 1.00E+04 6.25E+04 6.2515+04 6.25E+04 6.253+04 6.25E+04 6.25E+04 6.25E+04 6.251-Z+04 6.25E+04 6.25E+04 6,255+04 62534-04 6.25E+04 6.ZSE+04 6.25E+04 6.25E+04 6.25E+04 6.25E+04 6.25E+04 6.25E+04 6.25E+04 6.255+04 6.25E+04 6.25E+04 6.25E+04 6.2515+04 6.25E+04 6.25E+04 6.25E+04 6.25E+04 6.25E+04 1 76 3.14E+02 3.14E+02 3.14E+02 3.14E+02 3.,14E+02 3.08E+02 3.08E+02 3.08E+02 3.08E+02 3.08E+02 3.08E+02 3.08E+02 3.08E+02 3.08E+02 3.08E+02 3.08E+02 3.1 1E+02 3. 1 1E+02 3.1 1E+02 3.1 1E+02 3.1 1E+02 3.1 1E+02 3.1 1E+02 3.1 1E+02 3.1 1E+02 3.1 1E+02 3.1 1E+02 3. 14E+02 3. 14E+02 3.14E+02 3. 14E+02 3.14E+02 3.14E+02 3.14E+02 3.14E+02 3.14E+02 1.3lE-01 2.62E-01 3.28E-01 6.56E—01 1.31E+00 9.18E+01 9.34E+01 9.50E+01 9.67E+01 9.72E+01 9.89E+01 1.01E+02 1.02E+02 1.03E+02 1.0SE+02 1.07E+02 1.01E-01 1.50E-01 2.23E-01 3.35E-01 3. 8 lE-Ol 5.69E-01 8.51E-01 1.27E+00 1.45E+00 2.16E+00 3.24E+00 3.30E-03 6.60E-03 1.31E-02 2.63E—02 3.29E-02 6.56E-02 1.31E-01 2.62E-01 3.28E-01 . 7.64E-01 3.06E+00 4.78E+00 1.9 lE+Ol 7.65E+01 4.84E-04 1.94E-03 7.57E-03 3.06E-02 4.80E-02 1.9 lE-Ol 7 .64E-01 3.06E+00 4.78E+00 1.91E+01 7.65E+01 4. 84E-04 1.94E-03 7.57E-03 3.06E-02 4.80E-02 1.9 l E-Ol 7 .64E-01 3.06E+00 4. 78E+00 1.91E+01 7.6SE+01 4.84E-04 1.94E-03 7 .57E-03 3.06E-02 4.80E-02 1.9lE-01 7 .64E-01 3.068+00 4.78E+00 68.33 47.27 0.09 0.09 0.12 0.15 0.16 0.21 0.32 0.46 0.50 0.60 0.75 109.30 62.20 58.60 49.05 48.26 47.26 46.43 39.95 37.55 30.92 26.98 2287.88 1692.42 963.98 713.52 585.69 436.92 316.86 204.35 176.03 111.21 72.89 0.12 6.25E+04 6.25E+04 L60E+05 160E+05 L60E+05 L6OE+05 LGOE+OS L60E+05 L6OE+05 L60E+05 L60E+05 L6OE+05 L60E+05 L60E+05 L60E+05 L60E+05 LGOE+05 L60E+05 L60E+05 LéOE+05 L60E+05 L6OE+05 LéOE+OS L60E+05 L60E+05 160E+05 L6OE+OS L60E+05 L6OE+05 L60E+05 L6OE+05 L60E+05 160E+05 L6OE+05 160E+05 303E+05 1 77 3.14E+02 3.14E+02 3.08E+02 3.08E+02 3.08E+02 3.08E+02 3.08E+02 3.08E+02 3.08E+02 3.08E+02 3.08E+02 108E+02 3.0813+02 3.1 lE+02 3.1 1E+02 3JIE+02 3.1 lE+02 311E402 3.11E+02 3.1 1E+02 3.1 1E+02 3.1 lE+02 3.1 1E+02 3.1 1E+02 3J4E+02 3.14E+02 3.14E+02 3J4E+02 3.14E+02 3.14E+02 3.14E+02 3.14E+02 3.14E+02 3.14E+02 3.14E+02 3.08E+02 6.56E-01 1.31E+00 918E+01 9.34E+01 950E+01 9.67E+01 9.72E+01 9.89E+01 1.0lE+02 LOZE+02 1.03E+02 1.05E+02 1.07E+02 1.01E-01 1.50E-01 2.23E-01 3.355—01 3.81E—01 5.69E-01 8.51E-01 1.27E+00 1.45E+00 2.16E+00 3.24E+00 3.30E-03 6608-03 1.3 lE-02 2.63E-02 3.29E-02 6.56E-02 1.31E-01 2.62E-01 3.2813-01 6.56E-01 L31E+00 9.18E+01 1.91E+01 7.65E+01 4. 84E-04 1.94E-03 7.57E-03 3.06E-02 4.80E-02 1.9lE-01 7.64E-01 3.06E+00 4. 78E+00 1.91E+01 7. 6SE+01 4.84E-04 1.94E-03 7.57E-03 3.06E-02 4. 80E-02 1.91E-01 7.645-01 3.06E+00 4. 78E+00 l .91E+01 7. 65E+01 4. 84E-04 1 .94E—03 7. 57E-03 3.06E-02 4. 80E-02 l .9 1 E—Ol 7. 64E-01 3 . 06E+00 4. 78E+00 1.91E+01 7. 65E+01 4. 84E-04 0.21 0.25 0.33 0.33 0.41 0.55 0.69 0.60 0.74 0.99 170.66 87.49 76.43 75.69 86.81 84.56 69.58 56.77 43.06 34.67 26.57 1954.55 1106.06 629.12 404.95 333.03 286.19 164.38 153.31 158.10 124.15 72.55 3.03E+05 3.03E+05 3.03E+05 3.03E+05 3.03E+05 3.0BE+05 3.03E+05 3.03E+05 3.03E+05 3.03E+05 3,035+05 3.03E+05 3.03E+05 3.03E+05 3.03E+05 3.03E+05 3.03E+05 3.03E+05 3.03E+05 3.03E+05 3.0BE+05 3.03E+05 3 . 03E+05 3.03E+05 3.03E+05 3.03E+05 3.03E+05 3.03E+05 3.03E+05 3.03E+05 3.03E+05 3.03E+05 1 78 3.081-:+02 3.08E+02 3.08E+02 3.08E+02 3.08E+02 3.08E+02 3.08E+02 3.08E+02 3.08E+02 3.08E+02 3.11E+02 3.11E+02 3.1 lE+02 3.11E+02 3.1 1E+02 3.1 1E+02 3.1 1E+02 3.1 1E+02 3.1 1E+02 3. 1 lE+02 3. 1 lE+02 3. 14E+02 3. 14E+02 3. l4E+02 3. 14E+02 3. 14E+02 3. 14E+02 3. l4E+OZ 3. 14E+02 3. 14E+02 3. 14E+02 3.14E+02 9.34E+01 9.SOE+01 9.67E+01 9.72E+01 9.89E+01 1.01E+02 1.02E+02 1.03E+02 LOSE-+02 1.07E+02 l.OlE-Ol 1.50E-01 2.23E-01 3355-01 3.81E—01 5.69E-01 8.51E-01 1.27E+00 1.45E+00 2. 16E+OO 3.24E+00 3.30E-03 6601-3-03 1.3 115-02 2.63E-02 3.29E-02 65613-02 1.31E-01 2.62E-01 3.28E-01 6565-01 1.3 lE+00 1.94E-03 7.57E-03 3.06E-02 4.80E-02 1.9lE-01 7 .64E-01 3.06E+00 4.78E+00 1.91E+01 7.65E+01 4.84E-04 1.94E-03 7.57E-03 3.06E-02 4.80E-02 1.91E-01 7.64E-01 3.06E+00 4.78E+00 1.9 1 5+0] 7.65E+01 4.84E-04 1 .94E-03 75713-03 3.06E-02 4.80E-02 1.91E-01 7 6413-01 3.06E+00 4.78E+00 1 .91E+01 7.65E+01 179 W AACC. 1983. Approved Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists (eighth edition). AACC Method 44-15A. St. Paul, MN. Adriani, PM. and AP. Gast. 1988. A microscopic model of electrorheology. Phys. Fluids 31(10): 27 57-2768. Arp, PA and SO. Mason. 1977. Chains of spheres in shear and electric fields. Colloid Polymer Sci 255(12): 1165-1173. Arp, PA. and SO. Mason. 1977b. Particle behaviour in shear and electric fields: IX. Interactions of pairs of conducting spheres (experimental). Colloid Polymer Sci. 255: 980-993. Atkin, R.J., X. Shi, and WA. Bullough. 1991. Solutions of the constitutive equations for the flow of an electrorheological fluid in radial configurations. J. Rheol. 35: 1441- 1461. Austin, SA. 1993. Electrorheological parameter modeling. The Fluids Engineering Conference (Siginer, D.A., J.H. Kim, and RA. Bajura, editors), June 20-24. Wasington, D.C. FED-Vol. 164: 129-142. Bailey, P., D.G. Gillies, B.F. Smethurst, LH. Sutclifl‘e, and T.J. Hoyes. 1991. A new low-cost electroviscometer. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2: 735-739. Bares, J.E. and JD. Carlson. 1989. Electrorheological fluid design: an overview. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on ER Fluids (Carlson, J.D., AF. Sprecher, and H. Conrad, editors), August 7-9. Raleigh, NC. pp. 93-114. Baroncini, C., P. Di Filippo, G. Latini, and M. Pacetti. 1980. An improved correlation for the calculation of liquid thermal conductivity. Int. .1. of Thermophysics 1: 159- 17 5. Beck, J.V., K.D. Cole, A Haji-Sheikh, and B. Litkouhi 1992. Heat Conduction Using Green's Functions. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Washington DC. Beckett, S.T. 1988. Industrial Chocolate Manufacture and Use. AVI Publishing Co., Inc., New York. 1 80 Belitz, HD. and W. Grosch. 1987. Food Chemistry. Springer-Verlag, New York. Bezruk, V.I., AN. Lazarev, V.A Malov, and D.G. Usyarov. 1972. Study of the interaction between dispersed particles in an electric field K. Zhurnal 34(2): 165- 171. Bezruk, V.I., AN. Lazarev, V.A Malov, and 0.6. Usyarov. 1972b. Frequency effect of an external electric field on the interaction between dispersed particles in suspensions. K. Zhurnal 34(3): 321-326. Bhadra, D.K, C.R. Harder, and W.B. Thompson. 1989. Electroviscous damping for landing aircraft. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on ER Fluids (Carlson, J.D., AF. Sprecher, and H Conrad, editors), August 7-9. Raleigh, NC. pp. 402-408. Block, H. and JP Kelly. 1988. Electro-rheology. J. Phys. D: Appl Phys. 21: 1661- 1677. Block, H, J.P. Kelly, A Qin, and T. Watson. 1990. Materials and mechanisms in electrorheology. Langmuir 6(1): 6-14. Bonnecaze, RT. and J.F. Brady. 1989. Dynamic sinnrlation of a suspension of dielectric particles forming an electrorheological fluid. Proceedings of the Second lntemational Conference on ER Fluids (Carlson, J.D., AF. Sprecher, and H. Conrad, editors), August 7-9. Raleigh, NC. pp. 27-40. Bonnecaze, RT. and J.F. Brady. 1992. Yield stresses in electrorheological fluids. J. Rheol 36: 73-115. Boume, M.C. 1982. Food Texture and Viscosity: Concept and Measurement. Academic Press, New York. Brooks, DA 1989. Devices using electro-rheological fluids. Proceedings of the Second lntemational Conference on ER Fluids (Carlson, J .D., AF. Sprecher, and H Conrad, editors), August 7-9. Raleigh, NC. pp. 371-401. Brooks, DA 1992. Correlation of measurement techniques in electro-rheological fluids. Proceedings of the XIth Int. Congr. on Rheology, August 17-21. Brussels, Belgium pp. 763-765. Bouzas, J. and DD. Brown. 1995. Interactions, afl‘ecting microstructure, texture, and rheology of chocolate confectionery products. In: AG. Gaonkar, editor. Ingredient Interactions - Efl‘ects on Quality. Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York. pp 45 1-528. Carlson, JD. and '1'.G. Duclos. 1989. ER fluid clutches and brakes - fluid property and mechanical design considerations. Proceedings of the Second lntemational 181 Conference on ER Fluids (Carlson, J .D., AF. Sprecher, and H. Conrad, editors), August 7-9. Raleigh, NC. pp. 353-369. Ceccio, S.L. and AS. Wineman. 1993. Influence of electric field orientation on shear flow of electrorheological fluids. The Fluids Engineering Conference (Siginer, D.A, 1H Kim, and RA Bajura, editors), June 20—24. Wasington, D.C. FED-Vol. 164: 21-27. Chafley, CE. and 8.6. Mason. 1965. Particle behavior in shear and electric fields: IV. The viscosity of suspensions of nonrotating ellipsoids. J. Colloid Sci 20: 330- 340. Chafley, CE. and 8.6. Mason. 1968. Particle behavior in shear and electric fields: V. Effect on suspension viscosity. J. Colloid Interface Sci 27(1): 115-126. Chen, Y., AF. Sprecher, and H. Conrad. 1991. Electrostatic particle-particle interactions in electrorheological fluids. J. Appl Phys. 70(11): 6796-6803. Chevalley, J. 1974. Rheology of chocolate. J. Texture Studies 22: 177-196. Chevalley, J. 1991. An adaptation of the casson equation for the rheology of chocolate. J. Texture Studies 22: 219-229. Choi, Y. and M.R Okos. 1986. Thermal Properties of Liquid Foods - Review. In M.R Okos (editor). Physical and Chemical Properties of Food ASAE Publication, Michigan. Conrad, H., AF. Sprecher, Y. Choi, and Y. Chen. 1991. The temperature dependence of the electrical properties and strength of electrorheological fluids. J. Rheol. 35: 1393-1410. Conrad, H 1993. Electrorheological fluids: characteristics, structure and mechanisms. The Fluids Engineering Conference (Siginer, D.A, J.H. Kim, and RA. Bajura, editors), June 20-24. Wasington, D.C. FED-Vol. 164: 99-113. Coulter, JP. and T. G. Duclos. 1989. Applications of electrorheologicla materials in vibration control. Proceedings of the Second lntemational Conference on ER Fhrids (Carlson, J.D., AF. Sprecher, and H. Conrad, editors), August 7-9. Raleigh, NC. pp. 300-325. Coulter, J .P. 1993. An investigation of electrorheological material based controllable damping devices. The Fluids Engineering Conference (Siginer, D.A, J.H. Kim, and RA Bajura, editors), June 20-24. Wasington, D.C. FED-Vol 164: 115-127. Cuevas, R and M. Cheryan. 1978. Thermal conductivity of liquid foods - a review. J. Food Process Engineering 2: 283-306. 182 Danielson, G.C. and Sidles, RH 1969. Thermal diffusivity and other non-steady state methods. In: RP. Tye (editor). Thermal Conductivity. Academic Press, NewYork Davis, TR and PS. Dimick 1989. Lipid composition of high-melting seed crystals formed during cocoa butter solidification. J.A.O.C.S. 66(10): 1494-1498. Deinega, Y.F. and G.V. Vinogradov. 1984. Electric fields in the rheology of disperse systems. Rheol. Acta 23: 636-651. Dimick, PS. 1991. Principles of cocoa butter crystallization. Manu£ Confect. May: 109-1 14. Duclos, T.G., D.N. Acker, and JD. Carlson. 1988. Fluids that thicken electrically. Machine Design January: 42-46. Duclos, T. G. 1988. Electrorheological fluids and devices. Automotive Engineering 96(12): 45-48. Dukhin, SS. and V.N. Shilov. 1974. Dielectric Phenomena and the Double Layer in Disperse Systems and Polyelectrolytes. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. Fennema, O. 1985. Food Chemistry (second edition). Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York. Filisko, FE. and DR Gamota. 1993. Dielectric studies of ER systems under high bias fields. The Fluids Engineering Conference (Siginer, D.A, J.H. Kim, and RA Bajura, editors), June 20-24. Wasington, D.C. FED-Vol 164: 63-70. Gamayunov, N.I. and V.A Murtsovkin. 1982. Role of hydrodynamic interaction of dispersed particles in structurization processes in alternating electric field. Inzh- Fiz. Zh. 43(3): 375-378. Gamota, DR and FE. Filisko. 1991. High frequency dynamic mechanical study of an aluminosilicate electrorheological material J. Rheoi 35: 1411-1425. Gamota, D.R, AS. Wineman, and F .E. Filisko. 1993. Fourier transform analysis: nonlinear dynamic response of an electrorheological material J. Rheol 37: 919- 933. Gast, AP. and CF. Zukoski 1989. Electrorheological fluids as colloidal suspensions. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci 30: 153-202.. Gandhi, M.V., B.S. Thompson, and SB. Choi 1989. A proof-of-concept experimental investigation of a slider-crank mechanism featuring a smart dynamically ttmable connecting rod incorporating embedded electro-rheological fluid domains. J. Sound Vibration 135(3): 511-515. f 183 Gandhi, M.V., B.S. Thompson, and SB. Choi 1989b. A new generation of innovative ultra-advanced intelligent composite materials featuring electro-rheological fluids: An experimental investigation. J. Compos. Mater. 23: 1232-1255. Goldstein, G. 1990. Electrorheological fluids: Applications begin to gel. Mechanical Engineering October: 48-52. Halsey, TC. 1992. Electrorheological fluids. Science 258: 761-766. Hartsock, D.L., RF. Novak, and G]. Chaundy. 1991. ER fluid requirements for automotive devices. J. Rheol. 35: 1305-1326. Hicks, CR 1993. Fundamental Concepts in the Design of Experiments (fourth edition). Saunders College Publishing, New York Hill, J.C. and TH. Van Steenkiste. 1991. Response times of electrorheolgical fluids. J. Appi Phys. 70(3): 1207-1211. ' Hunter, RJ. 1989. Foundations of Colloid Science Volume 1. Oxford Science Publications, New York. Israelachvili, J. 1992. Intermolecular & Surface Forces. Academic Press, New York. Jaggi, N.K, J.T. Woestman, and R Tao. 1989. Possible phase transition in electrorheological fluids. Proceedings of the Second lntemational Conference on ER Fluids (Carlson, J.D., AF. Sprecher, and H. Conrad, editors), August 7-9. Raleigh, NC. pp. 53-62. Janocha, H. and B. Rech. 1993. Measurements on electrorheological liquids with rotational viscometers. Rheology 93: 40-47. Johnsen, A and K Rahbek. 1923. A physical phenomenon and its applications to telegraphy, telephony, etc. I.E.E. Journal 320(61): 713-725. Jones, T.B. 1989. Orientation of particle chains in AC electric fields. Proceedings of the Second lntemational Conference on ER Fluids (Carlson, J.D., AF. Sprecher, and H. Conrad, editors), August 7-9. Raleigh, NC. pp. 14-26. Jordan, T.C., W. Wong, and MT Shaw. 1988. A rheo-optical and materials approach to electrorheology. IEEE Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena, October 16-20. Ottawa, Canada. pp. 493-500. Jordan, T.C. and MT Shaw. 1989. Electrorheology. IEEE Trans. Elec. InsuL 24(5): 849-878. 184 Jordan, T.C. and M.T. Shaw 1989b. Structure in electrorheological fluids. Proceedings of the Second lntemational Conference on ER Fluids (Carlson, J.D., AF. Sprecher, and H. Conrad, editors), August 7-9. Raleigh, NC. pp. 231-251. Jordan, T. C., T.C.B. McLeish, and M.T. Shaw. 1991. Viscoelastic response of electrorheological fluids. II. Field strength and strain dependence. J. Rheol 36: 441-463. Kaji, N., Y.H Mori, and Y. Tochitani 1988. Electrically induced shape oscillation of drops as a means of direct-contact heat transfer enhancement: Part 1 - drop dynamics. J. Heat Trans. 110: 695-699. Kaji, N., Y.H. Mori, and Y. Tochitani 1988b. Electrically induced shape oscillation of drops as a means of direct-contact heat transfer enhancement: Part 2 - heat transfer. J. Heat Trans. 110: 700-704. Kanu, RC. and M.T. Shaw. 1992. Electrorheological fluids based on PBZT particles with controlled geometry. Proceedings of the XIth International Congress on Rheology, August 17-21. Brussels, Belgium pp. 766-768. Katsikopoulos, RV. and CF. Zukoski 1992. The electrorheological response: The efl‘ect of relaxation processes. Proceedings of the XIth International Congress on Rheology, August 17-21. Brussels, Belgium pp. 769-771. Kenaley, G.L. and M.R Cutkosky. 1989. Electrorheological fluid-based robotic fingers withtactile sensing. IEEE. pp. 132-136. Kent, N.L. 1983. Technology of Cereals (third edition). Pergamon Press, New York. Kent, M. 1987. Electric and Dielectric Properties of Food Materials. Science and Technology Publishers Ltd, England. Klass, D.L. and T.W. Martinek. 1967. Electroviscous fluids. 1. Rheological properties. J. Appi Phys. 38(1): 67-74. Klass, D.L. and T.W. Martinek. 1967b. Electroviscous fluids. 1]. Electrical properties. J. Appl Phys. 38(1): 75-80. Klingenberg, D.J., F. van Swol, and CF. Zukoski. 1989. Dynamic simulation of electrorheological suspensions. J. Chem Phys. 91(12): 7888-7895. Klingenberg, DJ. and CF. Zukoski 1990. Studies on the steady-shear behavior of electrorheological suspensions. Langmuir 6(1): 15-24. Klingenberg, D.J., F. van Swol, and CF. Zukoski. 1991. The small shear rate response of electrorheological suspensions. 1. Simulation in the point-dipole limit. J. Chem Phys. 94(9): 6160-6169. 185 Klingenberg, D.J., F. van Swol, and CF. Zukoski 1991b. The small shear rate response of electrorheological suspensions. 11. Extension beyond the point-dipole limit. J. Chem Phys. 94(9): 6170-6178. Klingenberg, D.J., D. Dierking, and CF. Zukoski. 1991c. Stress-transfer mechanisms in electrorheological suspensions. J. Chem Soc. Faraday Trans. 87(3): 425-430. Klingenberg, DJ. 1993. Sinmlation of the dynamic oscillatory response of electrorheological suspensions: Demonstration of a relaxation mechanism J. Rheol. 37 : 199-214. Korane, KJ. 1991. Putting ER fluids to work Machine Design May: 54-58. Kordonsky, V.I., E.V. Korobko, and T.G. Lazareva. 1991. Electrorheological polymer- based suspensions. J. Rheoi 35: 1427-1439. Korobko, E.V. and Z.P. Shulman. 1989. Viscoelastic behaviour of electrorheological fluids. Proceedings of the Second lntemational Conference on ER Fluids (Carlson, J.D., AF. Sprecher, and H. Conrad, editors), August 7-9. Raleigh, NC. pp. 3-13. Korobko, E.V., V.E. Dreval, Z.P. Shulman, and V.G. Kulichikhin. 1994. Peculiar features in the rheological behavior of electrorheological suspensions. Rheol. Acta 33: 117- 124. Kraynik, AM. 1989. Panel discussion - ER fluid standards: comments on ER fluid rheology. Proceedings of the Second lntemational Conference on ER Fluids (Carlson, J.D., AF. Sprecher, and H. Conrad, editors), August 7-9. Raleigh, NC. pp. 445-454. Kuramoto, N., M. Yamamki, K Nagai, K. Koyama, K. Tanaka, K Yatsuzuka, and Y. Higashiyama. 1995. The electrorheological property of a polyaniline-coated copolystyrene particle suspension. Rheol. Acta 34: 298-302. Langhaar, HL. 1951. Dimensional Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. Lee, 8., GS. Dulikravich, and V. Ahuja. 1993. Computations of electro-convective phenomena in electro-rheological fluids. The Fluids Engineering Conference (Siginer, D.A, J.H. Kim, and RA Bajura, editors), June 20-24. Wasington, D.C. FED-Vol 164: 29-42. Lemaire, E., G. Bossis, and Y. Grasselli 1992. Rheological behavior of electrorheological fluids. Langmuir 8( 12): 2957-2961. Lequeux, F., J.F. Palieme, Y. Thiriet, and R Hocquart. 1992. Stretching of macromolecules under shear flow and electric field. Proceedings of the XIth 186 lntemational Congress on Rheology, August 17-21. Brussels, Belgium pp. 7 72- 774. Lingard, S. and W.A Bullough. 1989. Tribological aspects of electro-rheological fluid behaviour with respect to non-polar base liquids. Proceedings of the Second lntemational Conference on ER Fluids (Carlson, J.D., AF. Sprecher, and H Conrad, editors), August 7-9. Raleigh, NC. pp. 158-175. Lou, Z., RD. Ervin, and FE. Filisko. 1993. The influence of viscometer dynamics on the characterization of an electrorheological fluid under sinusoidal electric excitation. J. RheoL 37: 55-70. Lou, Z., RD. Ervin, and FE. Filisko. 1993b. A preliminary parametric study of electrorheological dampers. The Fluids Engineering Conference (Siginer, D.A., J.H. Kim, and RA Bajura, editors), J1me 20-24. Wasington, D.C. FED-V01 164: 143-156. Margolis, D.L. and Vahdati, N. 1989. The control of damping in distributed systems using ER-fluids. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on ER Fluids (Carlson, J.D., AF. Sprecher, and H Conrad, editors), August 7-9. Raleigh, NC. pp. 326-348. Marshall, L., C.F. Zukoski IV, and J.W. Goodwin. 1989. Efl‘ects of electric fields on the rheology of non-aqueous concentrated suspensions. J. Chem Soc., Faraday Trans. 1. 85(9): 2785-2795. Martin, RA and F. Smullen. 1981. Simplified instrumentation for the measurement of chocolate viscosity parameters. Manuf Confect. May: 49-54. McLeish, T.C.B., T.C. Jordan, and M.T. Shaw. 1991. Viscoelastic response of electrorheological fluids. 1. Frequency dependence. J. RheoL 35: 427-448. Minifie, B.W. 1980. Chocolate, Cocoa and Confectionery: Science & Technology. AVI Publishing Co., Inc., Westport, Connecticut. Mohsenin, N.N. 1980. Thermal Properties of Foods and Agricultural Materials, Gordon and Breach, Science Publishers, Inc., New York. Mokeev, AA, E.V. Korobko, and L. G. Vedemikova. 1992. Structural viscosity of electrorheological fluids. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 42: 213-230. Monkman, G.J. 1991. Addition of solid structures to electrorheological fluids. J. Rheol. 35: 1385-1392. Morishita, S. and J. Mitsui.1992. Controllable squeeze film damper (an application of electro-rheological fluid). J. Vibration Acoustics 114: 354-357. 187 Nelson, DA and EC. Suydam 1993. The thermal aspects of the electrorheological efl‘ect and its impact on application design The Fluids Engineering Conference (Siginer, DA, 111 Kim, and RA Bajura, editors), June 20-24. Wasington, D.C. FED-Vol 164: 71-84. Newman, JS. 1991. Electrochemical Systems. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Ofoli, RY., Morgan, RG. and Stefle, J.F. 1987. A generalized rheological model for inelastic fluid foods. J. Texture Studies 18: 213-230. Okagawa, A, RG. Cox, and 8G. Mason. 1974. Particle behavior in shear and electric fields: VI. The microrheology of rigid spheroids. J. Colloid Interface Sci 47(2): 536-567. Okagawa, A and 8G. Mason. 1974. Particle behavior in shear and electric fields: V11. Orientation distributions of cylinders. J. Colloid Interface Sci 47(2): 568-587. Oppermann, G., G. Penners, M. Schulze, G. Marquardt, and R Flindt. 1989. Applications of electroviscous fluids as movement sensor control devices in active vibration dampers. Proceedings of the Second lntemational Conference on ER Fluids (Carlson, J.D., AF. Sprecher, and H Conrad, editors), August 7-9. Raleigh, NC. pp. 287-299. Otsubo, Y., M. Sekine, and S. Katayama. 1992. Efl‘ect of adsorbed water on the electrorheology of silica suspensions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 150(2): 324-330. Otsubo, Y., M. Sekine, and S. Katayama. 1992b. Electrorheological properties of silica suspensions. J. Rheol. 36: 479-496. Parthasarathy, M. and DJ. Klingenberg. 1995. A microstructural investigation of the nonlinear response of electrorheological suspensions: I. start-up of steady shear flow. Rheol. Acta 34: 417-429. Parthasarathy, M. and DJ. Klingenberg. 1995b. A microstructural investigation of the nonlinear response of electrorheological suspensions: II. oscillatory shear flow. RheoL Acta 34: 430-439. Petek, N.K, RJ. Goudie, F.P. Boyle. 1989. Actively controlled damping in electrorheological fluid-filled engine mounts. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on ER Fluids (Carlson, J .D., AF. Sprecher, and H. Conrad, editors), August 7-9. Raleigh, NC. pp. 409-418. Pieper, W.E. 1986. Chocolate viscosity. Manuf. Confect. June: 117-120. Pomeranz, Y. 1987. Modern Cereal Science and Technology. VCH, New York. Pool, R 1990. The fluids with a case of split personality. Science 247: 1180-1181. 188 Rahman, MS. 1992. Thermal conductivity of four food materials as a single fimction of porosity and water content. J. of Food Engineering 15: 261-268. Rajagopal, KR, RC. Yalamanchili, and AS. Wineman. 1993. Modeling electro- rheological materials using the theory of mixtures. The Fluids Engineering Conference (Siginer, D.A, J.H. Kim, and RA Bajura, editors), June 20-24. Wasington, D.C. FED-Vol. 164: 1-9. Reitz, RP. 1993. Electrorheological fluid chemical processing. US. patent 5,190,624, March, 2. Reitz, RP. 1993. Process of shaping an electrorheological solid. US. patent 5,213,713, May, 25. Robbins, J .W. 197 9. A quick, reliable method for measuring yield value, plastic viscosity and "Mac Michael" viscosity of chocolate. Manuf Confect. May: 38-44. Rozakeas, P.K, RJ. Snow, and SN. Bhattacharya. 1992. Electrorheological behavior of concentrated black coal water shuries flowing in a pipe. Proceedings of the XIth lntemational Congress on Rheology, August 17-21. Brussels, Belgium pp. 775- 777. Russel, W.B., D.A Saville, and W. R Schowalter. 1989. Colloidal Dispersions. Cambridge University Press, London. See, HT. and M. Doi 1992. Shear resistance of electrorheological fluids under time- varying electric fields. J. Rheol. 36: 1143-1163. See, HT. and M. Doi 1992b. Shear resistance of electro-rheological fluids under AC electric fields. Proceedings of the XIth lntemational Congress on Rheology, August 17-21. Brussels, Belgium p. 781. Seed, M., G.S. Hobson, and RC. Tozer. 1989. Macroscopic behaviour of ER fluid. Proceedings of the Second lntemational Conference on ER Fluids (Carlson, J.D., AF. Sprecher, and H. Conrad, editors), August 7-9. Raleigh, NC. pp. 214-230. Shaw, M.T. 1993. Structure-property relationships in ER fluids. The Fluids Engineering Conference (Siginer, D.A., J.H. Kim, and RA Bajura, editors), June 20-24. Wasington, D.C. FED-Vol. 164: 43-48. Shine, AD., I.K Yang, and KL. Tse. 1993. ER behavior of liquid crystalline polymer solutions. The Fluids Engineering Conference (Siginer, D.A., J.H. Kim, and RA. Bajura, editors), June 20-24. Wasington, D.C. FED-Vol. 164: 49-61. Shulman, Z.P., E.V. Korobko, and Y.G. Yanovskii 1989. The mechanism of the viscoelastic behaviour of electrorheological suspensions. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 33: 181-196. 189 Shulman, Z.P., AD. Matsepuro, L.N. Novichenok, S.A Demchuk, and LL. Svimovskaya. 1974. Effect of structure formation in a constant electric field on the thermal conductivity of a suspension of aerosil in cetane. lnzh-Fiz Zh. 27(6): 1116-1121. Stangroom, J.E. 1983. Electrorheological fluids. Phys. Technoi 14:290-296. Stanway, R, J. Sproston, and R Firoozian. 1989. Identification of the damping law of an electro-rheological fluid: A sequential filtering approach. J. Dyn. Sys. Meas. Control 111: 91-96. Stanway, R, J.L. Sproston, M.J. Prendergast, J.R Case, and CE. Wihre. 1992. ER fluids in the squeeze-flow mode: an application to vibration isolation. J. Electrostat. 28: 89-94. Stefl‘e, J.F. 1992. Rheological Methods In Food Process Engineering. Freeman Press, East Lansing, Michigan. Steiner, EH 1958. A new rheological relationship to express the flow properties of melted chocolate. Rev. Intern. Chocolate 13: 290-295. Steiner, EH. 1972. Melted chocolate. Manuf Confect. September: 24-28. Studt, T. 1992. Smart materials: Creating systems that react. R&D Magazine April: 55-60. Sweat, V.E. 1986. Thermal properties of Foods. In: M.A Rao and SSH. Rizvi (editors). Engineering Properties of Foods. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York. Tao, R, J.T. Woestman, and N.K Jaggi. 1989. Electric field induced solidification. Appl. Phys. Lett. 55(18): 1844-1846. Tao, R and 1M: Sun. 1991. Ground state of electrorheological fluids fi'om Monte Carlo simulations. Phys.l Rev. A 44( 10): R6181-R6183. Tao, R and J.M. Sun. 1991b. Three-dimensional structure of induced electrorheological solid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67(3): 398-401. Thurston, GB. and EB. Gaertner. 1991. Viscoelasticity of electrorheological fluids during oscillatory flow in a rectangular channel. J. Rheol. 35: 1327-1343. Toor, W.R 1993. Structure formation in electrorheological fluids. J. of Colloid and Interface Sci. 156: 335-349. Uejima, H 1972. Dielectric mechanism and rheological properties of electro-fluids. Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 11(3): 319-326. Usyarov, 0.0., I. S. Lavrov, and IF. Efremov. 1965. The role of polarization interaction in electrophoretic deposition. Kolloid. Zh. 28(4): 596-601. 190 Vorobeva, T .A, IN. Vlodavets, and P. I. Zubov. 1969. The size distribution of oriented aggregates formed in suspensions with the application of an alternating electric field. Kolloid. Zh. 31(5): 668-673. Wang, KC., R Mclay, and GE Carey. 1989. BR fluid modelling. Proceedings of the Second lntemational Conference on ER Fluids (Carlson, J.D., AF. Sprecher, and H Conrad, editors), August 7-9. Raleigh, NC. pp. 41-52. Whittle, M. 1990. Computer simulation of an electrorheological fluid. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 37: 233-263. Winslow, W.M. 1949. Induced fibration of suspensions. J. Appl Phys. 20: 1137-1140. Winslow, W.M. 1989. Keynote address: The Winslow Efl‘ect. Proceedings of the Second lntemational Conference on ER Fluids (Carlson, J.D., AF. Sprecher, and H Conrad, editors), August 7-9. Raleigh, NC. pp. ix-xii Wong, W. and M.T. Shaw. 1989. The role of water in electrorheological fluids. Proceedings of the Second lntemational Conference on ER Fluids (Carlson, J .D., AF. Sprecher, and H. Conrad, editors), August 7-9. Raleigh, NC. pp. 191-198. Xu, Y.Z. and RF. Liang. 1991. Electrorheological properties of semiconducting polymer-based suspensions. J. Rheol. 35: 1355-1373. ‘Xu, Y.Z. 1992. Mechanism and design of high performance dry ER fluid. Proceedings of the XIth lntemational Congress on Rheology, August 17-21. Brussels, Belgium p. 783. Yang, 1. and AD. Shine. 1992. Electrorheology of a nematic poly(n-hexyl isocyanate) solution. J. Rheol. 36: 1079-1104. Yang, J. 1993. Rheological characteristics of some electrorheological fluids with high shear strength. The Fluids Engineering Conference (Siginer, D.A, J.H. Kim, and RA Bajura, editors), June 20-24. Wasington, D.C. FED-Vol. 164: 85-98. Yen, W.S. and RJ. Achom. 1991. A study of the dynamic behavior of an electrorheological fluid. J. Rheol. 35: 1375-1384. Zhang, C. and J.R Lloyd. 1993. Enhancement of conductive heat transfer through an electrorheological fluid based composite medium. National Heat Transfer Conference. August 8 - 11. Atlanta, GA Ziegler, GR and SH. Rizvi.1985. Thermal conductivity of liquid foods by the thermal comparator method. J. Food Sci 50: 1458-1462. Zukoski, CF. 1993. Material properties and the electrorheological response. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci 23: 45-78. 191 Zuritz, C.A, S.K Sastry, S.C. Mccoy, E.G. Murakami, and J.L. Blaisdell 1989. A modified fitch device for measuring the thermal conductivity of small food particles. Trans. of the ASAE 32: 711-718. HICH "11111111111111“