..-‘. m3 IUIHHIIHHIIUHUUNINIIIH“I“!!!HINIIHIIHHHHI 193 01581 4498 V LIBRARY Mlchlgan State Unlversity This is to certify that the thesis entitled Petrogenesis of the Keetley Volcanics in Summit and wasatch Counties, North-Central Utah presented by LeeAnn Feher has been accepted towards fulfillment of the requirements for M. S- degree in W Major professor / ( 4-7-97 Date 0-7639 MS U is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Institution PLACE II BENIN BOX to remove thle checkout from your record. TO AVOID FINES return on or before dete due. DATE DUE DATE DUE DATE DUE MSU Ie An Affirmative ActiorVEqueI Opportunlty InethIon Wane-m PETROGENENIS OF THE KEETLEY VOLCANICS, IN SUMMIT AND WASATCH COUNTIES, NORTH-CENTRAL UTAH by LeeAnn F eher A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fiilfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Geological Sciences 1997 ABSTRACT PETROGENESIS OF THE KEETELY VOLCANICS, IN SUMMIT AND WASATCH COUNTIES, NORTH-CENTRAL UTAH by LeeAnn Feller The Oligocene Keetley volcanics (KV) are located in north-central Utah and occur on the eastern end of the 45-kilometer long, east-west trending, Wasatch intrusive belt (WIB). The WIB is part of the Cottonwood Arch and occurs along the extension of the Uinta Arch. The KV and the Wasatch intrusive rocks are a series of high-K, calc-alkaline rocks. The WIB consists of a western group and an eastern group of stocks. The western stocks consist of three chemically distinct stocks; the Little Cottonwood, Alta and Clayton Peak, the eastern stocks are chemically similar to the Alta stock. The KV are similar to the eastern stocks and the Alta stock with respect to emplacement ages and chemical composition. The chemical composition of the KV ranges from 55 wt. % SiOz to 68 wt. % SiOz and there is little variation in mineralogy In comparison with other well- documented calc-alkaline rocks the KV do not follow typical, coherent calc-alkaline chemical trends nor do they follow simple crystal fractionation and/or assimilation paths, thus the origin of the chemical variation is most likely due to complex processes involving multiple magmatic sources. The origin of the WIB and KV is probably related to partial melting of the crust due to production of decompression mantle melts resulting from the rollback of the Farallon plate which occurred in the Cordillera beginning 50 Ma. For T and Mick. iii ACIGVOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks Mom and Dad. I couldn’t have done this without your support. Lisa, my sister, thank you for all the laughs when I needed them and all the cat care-taking that allowed me to go on my adventures. Special thanks to Candice Murphy, my very best fiiend in the whole world. I thank Tom Vogel, my advisor, and Kathy Fishbum for all their support since my arrival at MSU. Thanks Tom for being an excellent role model and for all your guidance, ' especially in my moments of foundering. Bill Carnbray and Kaz Fugita, my committee members are thanked for their input and reviews of this thesis. I would also like to thank my original inspirations, Tim Flood and Nelson Ham who got me started on all this geology in the first place. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................ ' ..... vi i LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................ viii INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 1 Previous work ............................................................................... 4 Purpose and Regional Geology ............................................................ 6 Methods ...................................................................................... 9 WASATCH INTRUSIVE BELT WHOLE ROCK CHEMISTRES AND AGES ........ ll ' Major and trace element chemical compositions ....................................... II Summary of the mineralogy and textures of the Wasatch intrusive belt ............ 14 Ages .......................................................................................... 14 CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS AND MINERALOGY OF THE KEETLEY VOLCANICS .............................................................................. 16 Whole rock chemical compositions of the Keetley volcanics ......................... l6 Mineralogy of the Keetley volcanics ..................................................... 22 Petrography .................................................................................. 22 Electron Microprobe Analysis ............................................................. 35 Pyroxene therrnometry ..................................................................... SO Homblende geobarometry ................................................................. 55 Assimilation and fractional crystallization models ...................................... 57 DISCUSSION ....................................................................................... 61 Chemical and age relationships between the Keetley volcanics and the Wasatch intrusive belt ...................................................... 61 Evaluation of the effects of Pm on the evolution of the Keetley volcanics ....... 6] Reverse zoning in plagioclase ............................................................ 64 Evaluation of petrologic processes to produce the chemical variation within the Keetley volcanics; fractional crystallization, magma mixing and crustal assimilation ........................................................................ 67 Fractional crystallization ................................................ 69 Magma mixing ........................................................ 73 Assimilation and fractional crystallization ........................ 73 Origin of high-K calc-alkaline rocks and a possible petrogenetic model for the evolution of the Keetley volcanics ......................... 75 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................... 81 APPENDD( A ................................................................................... 83 APPENDIX B ................................................................................... 84 BIBLIOGRAPHY .............................................................................. 9O Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 Table 6 Table 7 Table 8 Table 9 Table 10 Table I 1 LIST OF TABLES Ages for the Wasatch Intrusive Belt, including the Keetley Volcanics.....15 Whole rock major element XRF analyses ...................................... 84 Whole rock trace element XRF analyses ....................................... 87 Modal point count analyses shown in percent ................................ 25 Representative plagioclase phenocryst microprobe analyses ................ 40 Representative amphibole phenocryst microprobe analyses ................. 51 . Representative pyroxene phenocryst microprobe analyses .................. 53 Representative biotite phenocryst microprobe analyses ..................... 54 Temperatures estimated from two-pyroxene thermometry based on end-member compositions ........................................... 56 Comparison of whole rock CIPW norm calculations of the Keetley volcanics vs. the Fish Canyon Tufl‘. Keetley volcanic samples are those used to calculate hornblende geobarometry ............ 58 Multiple linear regression models of Assimilation and Fractional Crystallization for the Keetley volcanics ....................................... 59 vii Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 3. Figure 4. Figure 5. Figure 6. LIST OF FIGURES Location of the Wasatch Intrusive Belt and the Keetley volcanics in north-central Utah. Boxed area is the map area for John’s map (1989). The Keetley volcanics are the southern most group of Tertiary volcanics. Modified from John (1989). PC = Pine Creek, A = Alta, WF = Wasatch Front, CN = Charleston-Nebo, DC = Deer Creek .............................................................................. 2 Close up of the Wasatch Intrusive Belt, illustrating the nine stocks as well as the Park Premier stock, the Indian Hollow plug is ofl‘ the map area just to the northeast of the Park premier stock. The Park Premier stock and the Indian Hollow plug intrude the Keetley Volcanics. Modified from John (1989). The area in the smaller rectangle outlines the 8 stocks numbered from 1 through 8 ................ 3 Schematic cross-section illustrating locations where estimated depths of emplacement were made from west to east along the Wasatch Intrusive Belt. The Little Cottonwood was emplaced at 11 km and the eastern most stocks were emplaced at about 1 km. From John (1989) ................................................................ 5 Some major and trace element chemical compositions for the Western stocks. Open crosses are the Little Cottonwood, open triangles are the Alta and filled triangles are the Clayton Peak ............................................................................... 12 Some major and trace elements chemical compositions for the Eastern stocks. Open circles are Flagstaff, filled squares are Mayflower, open squares are Valeo, open diamonds are Pine Creek and filled diamonds are for Ontario .......................................... 13 High-K calc-alkaline classification of the Keetley volcanics based on divisions after McBirney (1993). Symbols for Keetley volcanics are filled squares for Jordanelle Dam location, open squares for Francis, open diamonds for Indian Hollow, filled triangles for Peoa and open triangles for 1-80 ............................... l7 viii Figure 7. Figure 8. Figure 9. Figure l0. Figure l la-b. Figure 12a-b. Figure 13a-b. Figure 14a-b. Figure 15a-b. A typical AFM calc-alkaline difi‘erentiation trend (after Hess(l989)) plotted with the chemical trend of the Keetley volcanics. CA = calc-alkaline. Symbols for the Keetley volcanics are the same as in Figures 6 .................................................... 18 Comparison of high-K calc-alkaline volcanic rocks from the Central Volcanic Zone (CVZ) of the Andes in northern Chile, north-west Argentina, and south-west Bolivia (shaded area) to the Keetley volcanics. Data on the CVZ is from Wilson (1989). Most of the Keetley volcanics span the entire compositional range of the volcanic systems within the high-K calc-alkaline volcanics from the CVZ. Symbols for the Keetley volcanics are the same as in Figure 6 ..................................................................... 19 Major element variation diagrams for the Keetley volcanics. Note the large variation in MgO, T102, A1203 and the alkalis with a small variation in SiOz. Symbols for the Keetley volcanics are the same as in Figure 6 ..... ; ............................................... 20 Trace element variation diagram 5 for the Keetley Volcanics. All trace elements show scatter at constant 8102. Symbols are the same as in Figures 6 ............................................................. 23 Photomicrograph of sample 17—23 III, in plane polarized light a) and with crossed polars b). Note oscillatory zoning of hornblende as well as a near parallel alignment of the phenocrysts. Field of view is 4.4 mm across ................................................................ 27 Photomicrograph of sample 20-3 Fran, in plane polarized light a) and with crossed polars b). The hornblende phenocryst is rimmed by smaller grains of clinopyroxene. Note the small grains of clinopyroxene in the matrix. Field of view is 4.4 mm across ............. 29 Photomicrograph of sample 20-3 Fran under higher magnification in plane polarized light a) and with crossed polars b). Note the unaltered clinopyroxene surrounding the partially altered/reacted hornblende phenocryst. Field of view is 1.2 mm across .................. 31 Photomicrograph of sample 19-3b JD, in plane polarized light a) and with crossed polars b). At the top is a phenocryst of hornblende that has reacted and is in disequilibrium along side a fresh, unaltered clinopyroxene. Field of view is 1.2 mm across ............................ 33 Photomicrograph of sample 20-18 [-80, in plane polarized light a) and with crossed polars b). Notice the two grains of quartz on the ix lefi and right-hand sides. Both of these grains exhibit resorbed and embayed textures ............................................................... 36 Figure 16a-b. Photomicrograph of sample 17-2 III, in plane polarized light a) and Figure 17. Figure 18. Figure 19. Figure 20. Figure 21. Figure 22. Figure 23. Figure 24. Figure 25. Figure 26. crossed polars b). A large grain of K-feldspar makes up most of the field of view. This grain is probably a xenocryst ........................... 38 Feldspar triangle including rim, middle and matrix plagioclase phenocryst compositions. The one analysis at the Or apex is a K-feldspar xenocryst ........................................................... 42 Anorthite variations within plagioclase rim analyses. Diamonds are the maximum %An and the squares are the minimum %An within each sample ............................................................. 43 Anorthite variations within plagioclase middle analyses. Diamonds are the maximum %An and the squares are the minimum %An within a sample ......................................................................... 45 Anorthite variations within plagioclase matrix anlayses. Diamonds are the maximum %An and the squares of the minimum %An within each sample ..................................................................... 47 F eldspar triangles showing reverse zoned plagioclase phenocrysts of two representative samples ................................................ 49 Simple pyroxene quadrilateral including all pyroxene phenocryst compositions including rims, cores and middles ............................ 52 Comparison of the chemical compositions of the Western stocks (superimposed open areas) to the Eastern stocks. Symbols of the Eastern stocks are the same as in Figure 5 .................................. 62 Comparison of the chemical compositions of the Western stocks (superimposed open areas) to the Keetley volcanics. Symbols for the Keetley volcanics are the same as in Figure6 ........................... 63 Theoretical plagioclase feldspar phase diagram illustrating the effects of varying pressure, where P2>P1>P3 ........................................ 66 Typical differentiation trends of calc-alkaline rocks erupted within continental crust, 1 is for Lassen Peak, northern California and 2 is for Crater Lake National Park, Oregon (Hyndman, 1985 and references within). The Keetley Volcanics clearly do not follow the typical calc- Figure 27a-d. Figure 28. alkaline differentiation trend. Symbols for the Keetley volcanics are the same as in Figure 6 ..................................................... 68 Comparison of ,a typical calc-alkaline fractionation trend (shaded areas) from the Mogollon-Datil volcanic field with the Keetley Volcanics. Symbols for the Keetley volcanics are the same as in Figure 6 ................................................................................... 7O Stages of change in the angle of subduction of the F arallon plate and varying rates of convergence of the North American plate from 150 Ma to the present. Figure is modified from Cross and Pilger (1978) ............................................................................ 7s INTRODUCTION The Oligocene Keetley volcanics are located in north-central Utah and occur on the eastern end of the 45-kilometer long, east-west trending, Wasatch intrusive belt (Figure 1) (John, 1989). The Wasatch intrusive belt is part of the Cottonwood Arch and is continuous with the western extension of the Uinta Arch. The Keetley volcanics and the Wasatch intrusive rocks are a series of high-K, calc-alkaline rocks. These are divided into two groups of stocks and a sequence of volcanic rocks based on the relative location and differences in texture among the stocks. The western stocks are coarse-grained, mostly equigranular and include the Little Cottonwood, Alta, and Clayton Peak stocks. The eastern stocks are in general porphyritic, characterized by coarse—grained phenocrysts in a fine- to medium-grained groundmass, and include the Flagstaff, Ontario, Mayflower, Glencoe, Valeo, Pine Creek, and Park Premier stocks and the Indian Hollow plug. The two latter stocks occur in the very eastern end of the area and intrude the Keetley volcanics (Figure 2) (John, 1989). The Indian Hollow plug is not shown on Figure 2 but occurs just to the north-east of the Park Premier stock. The Keetley volcanics are a high- K andesitic sequence of lahars, volcanic conglomerates, tufi‘s and breccias, and minor lava flows (Leveinen, 1984 ). The clasts within the Keetley volcanics are characterized by fine- to medium-grained phenocrysts in a mostly fine-grained matrix. The Keetley volcanics have an estimated maximum thickness of at least 90 m near the Jordanelle Dam just east of Park City, Utah (Woodfill, 1972) and extend over 330 km2 of area in north-central Utah. The Keetley volcanics have been deposited subhorizontally between the west-east trending Uinta Arch to the east and the north-south trending Wasatch Range to the west. Figure 1. Location of the Wasatch intrusive belt and the Keetley volcanics in north- central Utah. Boxed area is the map area from John’s map (1989). The Keetley volcanics are the southern most group of Tertiary volcanics. Modified from John (1989). PC = Pine Creek, A = Alta, WF = Wasatch Front, CN = Charleston-Nebo, DC = Deer Creek. .2 fine: _ so: 8823 2.82 a 2: 82:8 2:852 3:25 2: 2 8a 2:. as: 2:: so: 8282 .2229 20:82 2: 8.52 mag 323: 8:5 2: :8 282 52:2: is 2E 22:... 322a 22: 23° 282:8 2: 2 33. 8.8 %E 05 be mm min Bo=ofl 5%.: 05 £09: comp—95 Stem of m: =25 a 2.82 2a. 2: 9:385 .28 9:52 5:33 22o 2. 286 .N 2:5 Previous Work John (1989) estimated the depths of emplacement of the Wasatch intrusive belt based on fluid inclusion data and contact metamorphic mineral assemblages as well as stratigraphic relationships. The estimated depths of emplacement progressively shallow from west to east with an estimated depth of the Little Cottonwood stock at 11 km in the west and of the eastern stocks at 1 km in the east (John, 1989) (Figure 3). The Keetley volcanics are the eastern most extrusive component of this whole system. Previously determined ages have shown that the stocks of the Wasatch intrusive belt all have approximately the same age ranging from 30 to 34 Ma (Bromfield, 1977) and (Crittenden, 1973). Detailed U/Pb dating of zircons (Constenius, pers. comm, 1996), and 4oAr/39Ar dating (Flood, pers. comm, 1996) of minerals are in progress and may give more insight into the age relationships within the Wasatch intrusive belt. Based on research in progress (Vogel, pers. comm, 1996) three distinct chemical trends occur in the three western stocks (Little Cottonwood, Alta, and Clayton Peak). ' The eastern stocks, in a gross sense, are chemically similar to the Alta stock. A goal of this study is to compare the chemical compositions of the Keetley volcanics and the Wasatch intrusive belt. Woodfill (1972) presented chemical analyses on seven samples from the Keetley volcanic field. From his work he concluded that the Keetley volcanics were derived from a trachyandesite parent. This model will be evaluated in this study. .88: 2.3 sea .5. _ 53¢ a 8828 as; 38:» .88 .528 2: :5 .5. : a :82?» as 838:8 2:: 2:. .22. 24355 £33.85 2: mac? 38 3 «83 Eat 8:8 203 .5882an .8 £30: 33858. 82.3 macaque. mew—Ema: 5:08-820 oquosom .m 23% g I 8.68; g 80.. II a i=3!)— 3 c 8» a I. a 31. 1., a: _ =5“. «8.. c838 x8: :2 a... Joe: 98.2.0300 3:: ’1’ k a s h + + s x .0 C” ~ ~ x C x n x s 3.3 I, a s s x \ ~ O 0.5 I s s s \ x x s W ewr/ a a \ ~ \ x \ x 0‘ e/ I a a a a \ a h.‘ I ss s s \ x \ ed II a la a \ a Q? I s s/ a a a J K / \ \ \ s / a x a g / \ a // \ x x I \ s s :3 V/ \ a “to“. 82.” // a \ . [/8 x / \ // a k «.33 Purpose The purpose of this study is two-fold. Relationships between the Wasatch intrusive belt and the Keetley volcanics will be determined by comparing chemical compositions and ages. The second part of this thesis is to determine if the origin of the compositional diversity of the Keetley volcanics was produced by difi‘erentiation of a single or multiple magmatic sources. In order to do this, the chemical and mineralogical variations will be determined and fi'actional crystallization, mixing, and assimilation models will be evaluated. Regional Geology The Wasatch intrusive belt is located in the central Wasatch Mountains and is considered to be part of the Cottonwood area (Crittenden, 1977). The Wasatch Range extends from the center of Utah, northward into Idaho. The western edge of the range marks part of the eastern limit of the Basin and Range province and the eastern edge, which in many places is not well defined, merges with the Wyoming Basin and the southern Colorado Plateau. The east-west trending Uinta Range separates the Wyoming Basin to the north and the Colorado Plateau to the south. All of these structures are part of the Cordilleran fold and thrust belt (Crittenden, 1977). The Wasatch intrusive belt also lies at the boundary between Archean basement to the north and Proterozoic basement to the south (Hutchinson and Albers, 1992). The junction between Archean and Proterozoic crust forms a weakness at the Uinta trend which extends west of Colorado through the Wasatch Mountains to central Nevada (Bryant and Nichols, 1988). The Cottonwood area lies at the boundary of the intersection of the Sevier orogenic belt and the east-west trending Uinta arch. Sedimentary units ranging from Precambrian through Mesozoic cratonal and miogeoclinal sediments are intruded by the nine Tertiary plutons of the Wasatch intrusive belt and as a result the sedimentary rocks now dip away fiom the west-east trend of the intrusive belt to the north, northwest, northeast, east and southeast, most notably near the Little Cottonwood stock and less obviously around the other stocks (Boutwell, 1912). The Keetley volcanics lie subhorizontally between the west-east trending axis of the Uinta Arch and the north-south trending Wasatch Mountains where they cover any structural continuities that may exist between the two major structures (Boutwell, 1912). By Late Cretaceous time the convergent continental margin of western U. S. had developed into an Andean type continental margin are system due to subduction of the Farallon plate under the North American plate (Miller et al., 1992, and references therein). During the Late Cretaceous through early Tertiary time, the Laramide and Sevier orogenic events caused by the convergence of the Farallon plate and the North American plate formed the Cordilleran foreland fold and thrust belt in Utah, Idaho and Nevada. The Laramide orogeny took place from 80 to 50 Ma (Miller, 1992) and the Sevier orogeny took place between 145 to 75 Ma (Armstrong, 1968). The eastern extent of the Sevier orogeny is referred to as the hingeline. The deformation caused by the Laramide style deformation occurred mainly within the Colorado Plateau to the east of the hingeline. Predominately thick-skinned deforrnational foreland uplifts and basins were produced in an area with relatively thin sedimentary cover on Precambrian crystalline basement. The Sevier orogenic event occurred to the west of the hingeline and produced thin-skinned, decollement thrusting with folding being restricted to the thick miogeoclinal sedimentary wedge and bordering cratonal strata that overlie the Precambrian basement (Miller, 1992). More than half of the total shortening that occurred during the Sevier orogeny happened simultaneously with the basement cored uplifis of the Laramide orogeny (Allmendinger, 1992). Hence, the two styles of deformation were occurring simultaneously for a time. The Keetley volcanics are bounded by the eastward plunging Cottonwood Arch and the westward plunging Uinta Arch. The Uinta Arch consists of Precambrian through Mesozoic strata that forms a westward plunging anticline. The Uinta Arch was uplifted during the Sevier orogeny and as a result is faulted on both flanks of the main anticline (Crittenden, 1977). Thrust faults developed in the Cottonwood Arch during the Laramide orogenic event. Prior to intrusion of the igneous rocks, large thrust faults and folds formed due to west to east ramping of thick sequences of sedimentary rocks. These faults have a present eastward dip but at the time of formation had a westward dip (Calkins, 1943). It is thought that the present eastward dip of these thrust faults was caused by continued compression from the west that was resisted by the Uinta Arch (Eardley, I939). The Cordilleran foreland fold and thrust belt has undergone a number of episodes of extension, but the most notable extension occurred in the Cenozoic. The Cenozoic extensional event formed what is known as the Basin and Range province. Extension occurred mainly in those areas that underwent shortening during the Mesozoic and early Cretaceous times. The general direction of extension was originally east-west and eventually rotated to northwest-southeast. The extension was accommodated by high- angle normal faulting and detachment faults (Wemicke, 1992). Constenius (1996) has recently illustrated that the Cordilleran foreland fold and thrust belt was reactivated due to a gravitational collapse caused by changes in the rate and style of North America-Pacific plate convergence. A change fi'om compression to extension began with the westward rollback of the Farallon plate beginning at ca. 49-48 Ma and ending ca. 20 Ma (Constenius, 1996). One local efi‘ect of the change fi'om compression to extension noted by Constenius (1996) is illustrated by the collapse of the Charleston-Nebo thrust sheet that has been reactivated since compression and has moved westward. The overall importance of the chemical and age relationships of the Keetley volcanics and the Wasatch intrusive belt to the regional geology is how the timing of emplacement of the magmas relates to the timing of the change fi'om compression to extension in the Cordillera Methods Because the Keetley volcanics consist mainly of volcaniclastics, no stratigraphic correlation within a field site or between field sites could be made. Therefore. the sampling strategy that was undertaken was to collect as wide of a variety of volcanic clasts as possible in order to sample the entire chemical variation within the volcanic sequence. Approximately 200 samples were collected from five different locations within the Keetley volcanic field. A total of 50 representative samples were chosen for analyses and added to 17 previously analyzed samples to give a total of 67 chemical analyses. Several laboratory methods were used to obtain the necessary chemical and mineralogical data for this study. Petrographic analysis of thin sections was done to determine the mineralogy and textures. X-ray fluorescence spectrometry was used to 10 determine whole rock major element and select trace element concentrations on 67 samples. Electron microprobe analysis was done at the University of Indiana using a Cameca Camabax SXSO electron microprobe to determine specific major element chemical compositions of phenocrysts and some microphenocrysts in selected samples. Statistical multiple linear regression to test fractional crystallization, mixing and assimilation models were used to evaluate possible petrologic processes as explanations for the chemical variation within the Keetley volcanics. X-ray fluorescence techniques involved measuring 1.0 g of finely ground rock powder, 9.0 g of Lithium Tetraborate and .160 g of Ammonium Nitrate. These materials were then mixed and firsed into glass disks by melting in platinum crucibles for at least 20 minutes and subsequently poured into platinum molds and quenched. Each sample was then analyzed for major and trace elements using a X-ray fluorescence spectrometer. The detection limits and standard deviations for the trace elements as well as the trimmed mean and standard deviations based on 16 repetitions for each major element are reported in Appendix A. Electron Microprobe analytical techniques involved obtaining two to three analyses fi'om each of the selected phenocryst grains including plagioclase, hornblende, pyroxene and biotite. Ten thin sections were chosen with 8 to 10 phenocrysts selected from each for analysis. The thin sections were chosen to represent an array of the most mafic, intermediate and most silicic end members out of the total sample array. In general, rim compositions were obtained for all selected phenocrysts and in some cases, such as for reversed zoned plagioclase, rim, middle, and core compositions were obtained. The probe conditions varied depending on the mineral being analyzed. For mafic silicates a 15 kv 11 accelerating voltage and a 20 nA beam was used. The beam size was 2 microns. For feldspars a 15 kv accelerating voltage and a 10 to 15 nA beam were used with a beam size of 5 microns. Wasatch Intrusive Belt Whole Rock Chemical Compositions, Mineralogy and Ages Major and trace element chemical compositions The Wasatch intrusive belt consists of nine stocks. These stocks are divided into three western stocks, the Little Cottonwood, Alta, and Clayton peak; and six eastern stocks, the Mayflower, Valeo, Flagstafi‘, Pine Creek, Ontario and Glencoe. All chemical data for the western and eastern stocks are from Vogel (pers. comm, 1996) The western stocks make up three distinct chemical groups based on major and trace element variation . diagrams. The Little Cottonwood stock is the most silicic at about 70% $102, the Alta is intermediate at 60 - 67% SiOz and the Clayton Peak is the most mafic at 55% - 60% SiOz. Rb/ Sr - oxide trends as well as major and trace element variation diagrams illustrate the three distinct chemical groups of the western stocks (Figure 4). The eastern stocks are not as chemically diverse as the western stocks. They range in $102 from about 58% to 68% and can not be isolated from each other in terms of distinct chemical groups (Figure 5). In terms of Rb/Sr - oxide trends and major and trace element variation diagrams, it is difficult to separate the eastern stocks from one another with the exception of the Ontario stock which has the highest Rb/Sr content (Figure 5). In a broad comparison, the eastern stocks are most similar to the Alta stock. 12 33.. corms—U 05 93 8.93.5 3:: Ba 82 05 2a vim—RE :30 4.838300 2:5 05 2a 8380 coco .868: 53.63 05 Lou mcoEmanoo 32:85 Ease—o 38. Ba 8qu 088 .v 25mm— N Duo 05 n o n v n N w c on on om on oo 2 _ _ n a _ a a ‘ oo 4 Q «on «at Q ‘ S -4 4 a e m T e e a 44 1 S 44.4 am .e «a. (of Q ., J 0.9 MW 0 Mn... 2...... $mwfim. 4 Q .\ . . Q "swan .n 2 «WM 1.4? V . as”. No - «V e m e .. a .me a «44 1 No 53m 4 e <0 4 444.4 G 1 <4 4 . 4 no 4 T 4 no V.° b b — _ P _ AV A”. L L ‘0 N m 9m 05 oo on om om on on cm on 00—. 4 q - . . o e a 4 a: «we and . 1 szJ. J F 8m 1 %%emefimal 1 20%.. .3 «13 1 ac Mayo»... 1 N e a 4 W 2&4 COM I may Aim ‘ ‘ 1 1 ‘4, l 0 .N 4 {M4 I f 1 4 022 oov r 4 44 4 1 l (44 l m 44 4 r i 0 com 1 l 4 1 l N. p _ Li P if 13 2.8.5 3m Bu 35.5% v25 93 x35 05.— 2: you 93 £28.56 :80 53°93: Bu 2a meazcm vo=m .ou_u> Ba 8a «23$ :28 Eufimafi 3m 2w 8—86 :25 .325 E03 ofimo 20233.8 .8255 E25.» can: 23 3.88 3.8 .m 253m 000 05 \1 o m v m N w on on cm on 0.0 _ d a a 0 4 _ 0.0 o . 1 o 0% 2%o 3 T I m I0 00% I 1 1 , % Q I 1 to H I I o o o 531 N6 1 0 fl 9 L 1 00?. 1 N6 53m 0 o no 1 .1 1 1 no '0 p — P p _ p b ‘0 «gm «9m cm on on on on on cm on 8—. a . q d o 1 1 F v 8a 1 Ego 1 , o I 1 so 1 5 9.0 1 000... . 1 1 I as... Ln .N 1 W % 14 022 I , 841 1 I 0 11m 0 1 10 8m! 11 1 1s 14 Summary of the Mineralogy and Textures of the Wasatch Intrusive Belt John (1989) summarizes the textures and mineralogy of the Wasatch intrusive belt. In general the western stocks range from medium- to coarse-grained for the Little Cottonwood to medium-grained for the Alta and fine-grained for the Clayton Peak. Parts of the Little Cottonwood and the Alta are porphyritic. The eastern stocks range from medium- to fine-grained with sedate porphyritic textures and groundmass ranging in size from .01 - .25 mm overall (John, 1989). The Keetley volcanics are characteristically porphyritic with fine to medium-grained phenocrysts. In terms of mineralogy, the Little Cottonwood contains K-feldspar phenocrysts up to 6 cm, quartz and biotite, magnetite and sphene with minor hornblende. The Alta stock contains phenocrysts of K-feldspar, plagioclase, quartz and biotite, hornblende, magnetite, sphene and minor amounts of clinopyroxene and illmenite. The Clayton Peak stock has phenocrysts of K—feldspar from l-2 cm, quartz and rare phenocrysts of biotite and contains clinopyroxene, biotite, magnetite and minor amounts of orthopyroxene, illmenite, sphene and hornblende. The eastern stocks contain plagioclase, biotite, hornblende, magnetite and quartz. The Park Premier also contains clinopyroxene, but no quartz. Some of the eastern stocks contain sphene. The Keetley volcanics contain plagioclase, hornblende, clinopyroxene, rare orthopyroxene, biotite and rare sphene as well as resorbed quartz. Ages Ages for the Wasatch intrusive belt including the Keetley volcanics are listed in Table 1. Biotite K/Ar ages (closing temperature 310°) of the Wasatch intrusive belt and Keetley volcanics were determined by Bromfield and others (1977) and Crittenden and 15 BI .25. BI .23. v.8 BI :3. Em 22 2.6 85 5 522:5" 0 D Em :5. 3 €35 20.1285" m o .06 22 3m 68: 3:228" 0.x D Em :5. «.3 «858.3 >283. o Em 22 how m Em 25. 93 BI 22 Em 22 Now 26:01 5E: m Em 22 ad,“ xwma .8320 m BI 22 «.mm m Em .22 Q8 5:55 {no 0.x ant: odm 0.x BE: 98 m Em 25. ”an o BI 35. Inn m Em Eb. new 0 BI 35. ad» m Em 22 5mm 0 BI :3. mam m Em .22 oén m BI 2.2 New m Em :5. Inn m BI 25. 0.9. 0.x 85 5mm D Em 2.2 Yum 0.x 35 0.3 2.2.5 D Em .Sv. Qua D Em ED. Qua m BI :3. «.3 526:3: D Em 25. fimn m Em .45. tum m Em 22 n. 5 m BI :3. as” m Em :5. m. 8 S_< m BI 25. ham £332... 0.x BIS mdn m Em ED. Qon .o.v_ BE: «.8 m Em 22 «.9. 02.3 o BI 25. P. 3 o 822 :5. 9mm 0 Em 22 mm» D Em :3. ”SN m Em 22 «.mm 320 SE D Em 25. fimm 8035.80 2:: 8.02m Efiumm 9.98m 58mm; 858 8522 mm< 33 38:9 venom 8522 ma< .68 2826. 338.? 3:03. 9: new =8 @2255 52325 2: .8 8% .F oBmh 16 others (1973) are about 34 Ma for the eastern stocks, Keetley volcanics and the Clayton Peak stock; 32 Ma for the Alta stock and 26 Ma for the Little Cottonwood stock. Biotite K/Ar ages are significant for the eastern stocks and the Keetley volcanics because they represent emplacement ages due to the quenched textures of these rocks. Zircon U/Pb ages with a closing temperature of 750° (F eher et al., 1996) represent emplacement ages as well and were determined to be 36 Ma for Clayton Peak stock, 33.5 Ma for the Alta stock and 30.4 Ma for the Little Cottonwood stock. Chemical Compositions and Mineralogy of the Keetley Volcanics Whole Rock Chemical Compositions of the Keetley Volcanics A total of 67 chemical analyses were done on the Keetley volcanics. The major element and trace element analyses from XRF spectroscopy are given in Tables 2 and 3 of Appendix B. )0: R techniques are discussed on p.10. The Keetley volcanics occur mostly within the high-K calc-alkaline series of rocks (Figure 6) however, they do not follow the typical AF M, calc-alkaline differentiation trend (Figure 7). The Keetley volcanics have a large variation in chemical composition which is illustrated in Figure 8. Figure 8 compares the entire Central Volcanic Zone of the Andes which is composed of several individual volcanic systems to the single volcanic system of the Keetley volcanics. Most of the Keetley volcanics span this large variation. The major element trends of CaO, F e0 and MgO in general show decreasing trends with an increase in SiOz, but they do not show particularly coherent trends (Figure 9). MgO has the most deviation from a linear trend (Figure 9). The alkalis (NaZO and K20), A1203, and TiOz show scatter at constant SiOz (Figure 9). The trace elements; Rb, KO 2 17 l l T I L Shoshonitic A High-K calc-alkaline Cale-alkaline Tholeiitic l l l l i so 55 60 65 70 75 so SiO 2 Figure 6. High-K calc-alkaline classification of the Keetley volcanics based on divisions after McBimey (1993). Symbols for the Keetley volcanics are filled squares for Jordanelle Dam location, open squares for Francis, open diamonds for Indian Hollow, filled triangles for Peoa and open triangles for 1-80. FeO Na O+K 0 M90 2 2 Figure 7. A typical AFM calc-alkaline differentiation trend afier Hess (1989) plotted with the chemical trend of the Keetley volcanics. CA = calc-alkaline and the solid black line is the path of differentiation. Symbols for the Keetley volcanics are the same as in Figure 6. KO 2 l9 50 60 7O 80 SiO 2 Figure 8. Comparison of high-K calc-alkaline volcanic rocks from the Central Volcanic Zone (CVZ) of the Andes in northern Chile, north-west Argentina and south-west Bolivia (shaded area) to the Keetley volcanics. Data on the CVZ from Wilson (1989). Most of the Keetley volcanics span the entire compostitional range of the volcanic systems within the high-K calc-alkaline volcanics from the CVZ. Symbols for Keetley volcanics are the same as in Figure 6. 20 Figure 9. Major element variation diagrams for the Keetley volcanics. Note the large variation in MgO, TiOz, A1203 and the alkalis with a small variation in SlOz. Symbols for the Keetley volcanics are the same as in Figure 6. 21 7 .1 r r I r 9 Q. E] 0 Q1 C30 5 e “ " Am. e 7 Na,O+K;o A I 4 l— -—1 1— —6 AI 3 L I l l 8 1 1 1 1 19 7 r— I - — .1 18 I — -17 6b ‘ n‘ --1 1. ~16 A10 FeO 5 - .— . ' 1. — 15 4" ‘ A536 T _ flu 3 1 1 13 6 Y I 1 5 P- ‘g -1 L- 410 [I] 4 _ . -« r— - 09 A A M90 3 — I fi ~ 1— — 08 no ('1 ‘ Q 1»- - e — 05 I o 1 1 1 05 5O 60 70 80 50 70 80 22 Sr, Ba, Zr, Nb have little coherence at nearly constant SiOz. P205 shows a general decrease with increase in silica but is not a tight linear trend (Figure 10). Mineralogy of the Keetley Volcanics Petrography A total of 50 thin sections were prepared from the volcanic clasts of the Keetley volcanics. Representative modal analyses for the Keetley volcanics are illustrated in Table 4. A total of 800 point counts were done for each modal analysis. The distinction between phenocrysts and matrix was based on grain size. Any grain that was less than .5 mm was considered matrix and anything larger was considered a phenocryst. The amount of phenocrysts in the volcanic clasts ranges from 35% to 63% (Table 4), with a mean percentage of phenocrysts equal to 53.5%. Petrographic descriptions of the Keetley volcanics will be given collectively due to their similarities. The major variation being the presence or absence of pyroxene. The Keetley volcanics are porphyritic andesites. All samples contain phenocrysts of plagioclase and hornblende as the major phases with minor amounts of biotite in most samples, with the exception of JD 19-9 and 1H 17-13 which contain about 10% biotite each. In most samples plagioclase is the dominant phenocryst (Table 4). Plagioclase occurs as medium- to fine-grained, euhedral to subhedral laths as well as microphenocrysts within the matrix. Plagioclase laths have characteristic oscillatory zoning and many are reversely zoned. Plagioclase melt inclusions are very common in nearly all of the thin sections. Homblende is the next most abundant phenocryst phase and occurs as fine- to medium-grained, euhedral to subhedral phenocrysts. Homblende phenocrysts often 23 Figure 10. Trace element variation diagrams for the Keetley Volcanics. All trace elements show scatter at constant SiOz. Symbols for the Keetley volcanics are the same as in Figure 6. 24 200 1 1 1 1 700 >- -6m 150r J _ “ ‘D dsm M Rb 100L J _ A I «40021 O A p - “3% 50)- q . 1200 A o ‘ 1 . L 100 1 1 a 20 14001- ‘E - 12W” ‘r " ‘ D S! 10x) P ‘ ‘9 410 ND F A,“ to . t ”3‘05. 800» < "‘ Q‘ ‘-!».‘_ Ai‘ 600 4 ‘ 0 3000 1 1 08 > «07 . ‘ 406 A Ba 20ml j » ' ¢‘[‘ +0590: 1 r; a «04 a. 5‘- » a. "03 1m L l J 02 50 70 8050 so 70 so SO: SO” 25 Table 4. Modal point count anlayses shown in percent. Sample # JD 18-8 JD 19-9 JD 19-10 JD 19-17 JD 19-1 JD 19-2 JD 18-9B JD 19-37 IH 16—4 IH 17-2 lH 17-13 IH 17-23 IH 17-25 l-80 15-11 l-80 20-14 PEOA 19—27 PEOA 19-28 PEOA 19-31 FRAN 20-3 FRAN 20-11 Plag 28.25 25.25 12.73 25.75 28.13 30.84 19.50 34.42 20.63 32.44 12.73 23.91 24.50 17.98 25.88 33.29 32.58 12.50 25.06 25.59 Amph 11.63 3.36 3.62 8.00 9.63 16.23 12.00 7.29 15.63 16.15 3.62 13.70 17.25 11.40 13.13 2.12 4.24 1.82 14.09 7.24 Biot 11.25 9.95 10.24 5.50 1.38 1.37 0.25 1.63 1.13 4.62 10.24 1.12 0.13 2.47 3.75 0.37 1.50 6.19 1.00 4.00 Cpx 5.88 20.40 17.35 0.50 1.63 0.12 0.75 0.00 1.50 0.00 17.35 1.25 1.25 1.18 0.00 11.85 14.48 19.42 6.23 16.10 Opaq 0.75 2.11 2.62 0.88 8.63 1.87 1.75 3.39 4.88 0.90 2.62 1.49 2.50 9.87 4.13 2.12 1.12 2.43 1.87 2.62 Qtz Matrix Phenocrysts 0.63 1.24 1.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.39 0.00 0.77 1.87 0.00 0.00 1.06 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 41.63 37.69 51.56 59.38 50.63 49.56 65.75 50.88 56.25 45.13 51.56 58.53 54.38 56.05 52.50 50.25 46.07 57.65 51.75 44.44 58.37 62.31 48.44 40.62 49.37 50.44 34.25 49.12 43.75 54.87 48.44 41.47 45.62 43.95 47.50 49.75 53.93 42.35 48.25 55.56 26 display oscillatory zoning (Figure Ila-b). Also note the near parallel alignment of the phenocrysts in Figure Ila-b, this texture is most common in the samples from the Indian Hollow location. Occasionally hornblende is cored by pyroxene. Inclusions of plagioclase, opaques and some biotite are common. In most samples the hornblende phenocrysts are surrounded by very fine-grained clinopyroxene (Figures 12a—b and 13a-b). Disequilibrium of hornblende phenocrysts is common and is characterized by reaction rims that are composed of opaques. In some cases the hornblende phenocrysts not only have reaction rims but appear to have been nearly completed reacted to form an opaque mineral (magnetite?) In these same samples the clinopyroxene is in equilibrium and appears fresh and unaltered and does not appear to have reacted (Figure I4a-b). In about 80% of the samples clinopyroxene exists as fine- to medium-grained, euhedral to subhedral phenocrysts coexisting with hornblende as well as in the matrix as microphenocrysts in most samples. One orthopyroxene phenocryst was detected by electron microprobe anda few phenocrysts were found in thin section. Biotite exists as phenocrysts and microphenocrysts within the matrix. Biotite phenocrysts are less abundant than hornblende phenocrysts in most samples. They are fine-grained, euhedral to subhedral, and are often nucleated on hornblende phenocrysts. In most of the samples in which hornblende has reacted to opaques the biotite has reacted as well. Opaque minerals are found in all samples and the majority are magnetite, however, rare grains of illmenite were detected by electron microprobe analysis. Quartz occurs as anhedral, resorbed, embayed grains up to 1.5 mm in a few samples and does not have a modal abundance of more than about 2.5%. Based on the 27 Figure l la-b. Photomicrograph of sample 17-23 TB, in plane polarized light a) and with crossed polars b). Note oscillatory zoning of hornblende as well as a near parallel alignment of the phenocrysts. Field of view is 4.4 mm across. 29 Figure lZa-b. Photomicrograph of sample 20-3 Fran, in plane polarized light a) and with crossed polars b). The hornblende phenocryst is rimmed by smaller grains of clinopyroxene. Note the small grains of clinopyroxene in the matrix. Field of view is 4.4 mm across. 31 Figure l3a-b. Photomicrograph of sample 20-3 Fran under higher magnification in plane polarized light a) and with crossed polars b). Note the unaltered clinopyroxene surrounding the altered/reacted hornblende phenocryst. Field of view is 1.2 mm across. 32 33 Figure l4a-b. Photomicrograph of sample 19-3b ID, in plane polarized light a) and with crossed polars b). At the top is a phenocryst of hornblende that has reacted and is in disequilibrium along side a fresh, unaltered clinopyroxene. Field of view is 1.2 mm across. 34 35 resorbed, embayed texture and the rare occurrence it is probable that the quartz grains are xenocrysts (Figure lSa—b). However, the texture of these may be due to the fact that the quartz grains are disequilibrium phenocrysts. One large grain and a few smaller grains of K-feldspar occur as irregular grains (Figure 16a-b). These are probably xenocrysts. Rare mineral aggregates up to 1 cm are found throughout the samples and generally are composed of hornblende, biotite and quartz phenocrysts. Electmn Microprobe Analysis Mineral chemical compositions were determined by a Cameca Carnabax electron microprobe at the University of Indiana for plagioclase, amphibole, pyroxene, and biotite (see p. 10-11 for a description of techniques). Magnetite is the dominant opaque mineral. Representative plagioclase compositions are presented in Table 5. The total range of plagioclase phenocrysts for all microprobe analyses are illustrated in Figure 17. The one analysis that is orthoclase is probably a K-feldspar xenocryst. Two analyses are albitic plagioclase(An1o), both of these analyses are rim analyses. Most plagioclase rim compositions are within An3o to An” with a maximum anorthite variation of Ann to Ams in sample 19-9. An anomalous variation from Anw to Ams occurs within sample 19-2 (Figure 18). The plagioclase middle compositions have a maximum anorthite variation of An“ to Anso, which occurs within sample19-2 (Figure 19). The maximum anorthite variation within the matrix plagioclase ranges from Ann to Arm and occurs within sample 19-17 (Figure 20). Several of the plagioclase phenocrysts are reversely zoned (Table 5) and are not specific to any one sample or a group of samples. Examples of reverse zoning are illustrated in Figure 21. Oscillatory zoned grains are also common. 36 Figure lSa-b. Photomicrograph of sample 20-18 [-80, in plane polarized light a) and with crossed polars b). Notice the two grains of quartz on the left and right-hand sides. Both of these grains exhibit resorbed and embayed textures. 38 Figure l6a-b. Photomicrograph of sample 17-2 IH, in plane polarized light a) and crossed polars b). A large grain of K-feldspar makes up most of the field of view. This grain is probably a xenocryst. 39 40 avé Nd 3.3 00.3 00 cm «hum 31.8 3.02. and 006 «No bad :6 2.6 end aNd 2.8 3.8 8.8 8.8 aiv and 00.8.3 what «06* no.0? on. For NO. For and and ms...” 36 mod Fwd? and ncd oofiu hndm {men 3.9... E: mfiuéw RE mKN1mw 98 méhdw E: «-519. SE «-513 9.8 95-9 E: v-92. 8.. 8.8 88 8.8 88 8.8 8.8 8.8 88.. 8.8 8.: 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 «.8 8.8 8.8 8.8. 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 88 88 88 88 :8 88 88 88 88 8.... 88 :8 8.: 8.8 28 8:: 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 2.8 :8 8.8 8.8 8.8 2.8 , 8.8,, 8.8 8.8 ,, . 8.8 8.8 18.8.8 5.. 8.8.: 2:. 8.8.: 28 8.8.: 8: 8.2.8 as 8-8-8. 28 8.8-8. .8 8.2.8 25 ~88. 8 8.8 8.. 88 88 8 3.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 :8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.3. 882 882 8.8 888 8.2: 88 8.8 88 8.. 88 88 8.8 :8 88 88 88 88 88 88 38 8.. 88 88. 88 28 88 88 3.8 88 8.8 8.8 8.8 88 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 SE Voéw and 9.2” 3.3 omdm mud 3.0 no.» and . 56w Nfiom Soc ”:12 36 $06? 3. 3 mm. Po? and 38.” mod 5.0 omKN no.3 28 :12 tlll‘lrllrllllllrlllllll 8O :< n< .30... ON! ONmZ Omo 00m MON? N05 2 . Saw 80 :< a< .30... 09.. ONmZ Ono 00“. «ON? NOE 2 Saw 88598 35388:: .mdoocmca omm_oo_dm_nfiw>_§commaom .m mash 41 Fwd vv.mv «flmm movdm hand ”mad wmnd and h 3.0m vadm Et m-N-m_. BE m-N.mF 28 m-N-mF Et 7810' EE 7?? no... Fmdv owdv moudm End hum...“ whodw ”mud 30.5w. 0mm.mm pm... we. 3 wnfiv condor CNN... 93..» 3.0.3 owod Nmndm Fm fmm 8N omdv East ovmdm mwvd Numé Nowdw awed vovfim 09.3 3”.» dev 3.0m «Mada vomd nmfo mmvd NmNd momdw 3.5m 3N ocdv mod? medm $56 #86 9.0.. mmNd SNKN mvnhm 050 :12 E: oéméw EE m-o~.m_. 200 méméw N_..m odm Noam voodm shod word sofa nvvd 36m mwmfim mhé NNN? mmNm smmdm amod Nmod wood wand mmodm mmnflm v0.» 3‘. 5 made under wové Nuad mmmd mmvd onéw onodo 80 :< 94. .Soh ON! ONuZ Ono Ooh. MON? NQm 2 83 88:83:88 .m 288... 42 An A7 + + II- V \l \l V V V \l y M Ab Or Figure 17. Feldspar triangle including rim, middle and matrix plagioclase phenocryst compositions . The one analysis at the Or apex is a K—feldspar xenocryst. 43 Figure 18. Anorthite variations within plagioclase rim analyses. Diamonds are the maximum % An and the squares are the minimum % An within each sample. «mg-mam E: 82860.8 53> 8286mm .0 8.8.6:: .208 m o u o m v w + 8 .1 !.i-! T-- l T «.9 a 8-8. 8 vwfip Tap .. 3:9 5 m— . 0-3% «-3 a v”: .v o I: 88. t8. .. n swé P h hN$ P 5.2 5.9. l T ow SIM-10W % 45 Figure 19. Anorthite variations within plagioclase middle analyses. Diamonds are the maximum % An and the squares are the minimum % An within each sample. 46 $2.83 228:: 38.8638 55. 829.88 .0 38:5: :38. 8. 8 8 N. 8 T1 . t. + 1+; 8.84. 8.8. . «.8. a 8.8. 3 8.8. . «.8. . 8.8. 8.8. . vmé... a cw: .. 5.2 5-9. v n . mud. RN88 i y l. llu. 94 TI] I‘ll! no.2. 58.. euuuouv % 47 Figure 20. Anorthite variations within matrix plagioclase analyses. Diamonds are the maximum % An and the squares are the minimum % An within each sample. 48 To. ad w mé _. mmmzmcm 93.8.8.8. xEmE £5, 829:3 .0 .353: .90... v hmé — hmd — .iilll 3 Juli- 5-2. 2-2 . N p + 3:3- 313-333]- mm 3.9 a 1.. 9* 3.3 . 2: ._ 0.2. .. mm 88 GINUOUV % 49 Figure 21. Feldspar tn'angles showing reverse zoned plagioclase phenocrysts of two representative samples. 50 Representative amphibole compositions are listed in Table 6. In all of the analyses FeO is calculated as FeO = F e0 + .8998 *Fe203. The most variation within the amphibole analyses is within MgO, which varies from 9.85% to 14.82%, CaO ranges from 10.75% to 11.95%, with two anomalous analyses at about 20%. All pyroxene microprobe analyses are plotted in Figure 22 on the pyroxene quadrilateral and representative pyroxene compositions are illustrated in Table 7. Most of the analyses are MgO rich with intermediate CaO and fall within the clinopyroxene range. Three analyses are within the orthopyroxene range. Sample 19-28 is the only sample which allows for two-pyroxene thermometry to be estimated because it contains both clinopyroxene and orthopyroxene. Table 8 lists some representative compositions of biotite phenocrysts. There is very little variation within the biotite compositions. K20 is consistent ranging from 8.19 to 9.43 wt. %. Pyroxene Thermometry Two-pyroxene thermometry was done using one orthopyroxene analysis with two different clinopyroxene analyses from within sample 19-28 JD. The results of this are illustrated in Table 9. The Ca-QUILF system developed by Lindsley and Frost (1992) was used to determine the temperatures. This method requires that four phases of the FeO- MgO-CaO-TiOz-Sioz system be used. However, only the clinopyroxene and orthopyroxene analyses were available from sample 19-28 ID, no Fe-Ti oxide analyses were obtained. Because of this, reasonable pressures had to be estimate for the clinopyroxene and orthopyroxene compositions in order to obtain temperatures. Using the QUILF program (Anderson et al., 1993) pressures of 1, 2, 4 and 6 Kb were arbitrarily 51 8.88. 8..8. 8.88 88.88. 88.88. 8.88. .28. 88.8 88.8 ...8 .88 8.8 88.8 _o 88.8 88.8 88.8 88.8 88.8 88.8 n. .8. 88.8 88.8 88.. 88.. 88.. of 8.... 88.. 88.. 8.8 88.. 88.. of 88.8 ...8 8.8 88.8 88.8 8... 0882 .8... 8e... 8... .8... .8... 88... 080 8.... .8... .8... 88.8. 88.8. 88.8. 08.2 .88 88.8 88.8 3.8 88.8 88.8 08.2 88.8. 88.8. 8.8. 88... 88... 88... 08... .8... .88. .8... .88. 88.. 88... 008.... .88 88.8 3.8 8.. . 88. . 88.. No... .m..:. 88.8.. 88.... .8...- 88... 3.... N0.8 . E: 1.8. 8.... 8-..-8. 8.8 8-..-8. .88 8.8.8. 8.5 8.8.8. 8.8 8.8.8. 25388 .888. 88.88 .888 88.88 ....8. ...88. ...88 88.88 ...88. .28. .88 .88 88.8 88.8 8.8 ...8 88.8 88.8 88.8 .o 88.8 88.8 88.8 .88 88.8 88.8 88.8 88.8 88.8 n. 88. 88.. .8. .88 88.. 88. 88.. .88 .88 of 88.. 88.. .8. .8.... 8... 8... .8. 8... 8... of 88.. 88. .8. 8.8 8... 8... 3.8 ...8 ...8 0882 .8... 88... 88... 88.8 88... 8.... 88... .8... 8.... 080 88.8 8.8. 8.8. 88.8 88... 8.... 88.8. 8.8. 88.8. 08.2 .88 ...8 8.8 88.8 3.8 88.8 88.8 88.8 88.8 08.2 .8... t... 88.8. 88.8 88.8. 2.8. 88.8. 88.8. ...8. 08". 88.8. ..... 88.8. 88.8. 8.8 88.8 88.. 88.8. 88.8. 8082 88.8 88.8 88.8 8.8 .8. . .8. . 88.8 88.8 88.8 No: ...88 .888 88.88 88.8. 88.8.. 88.8.. 8.... .88.. 88.8.. N0.8 88.8.-.. 8.58.-.. 8.88.-.. 588-8-.. 8.5 8.8... 8.8 8-8-.. .88 8.8.8. 888 8-8-8. 28 8-8-8. 28.83.88 mow-$888 88338.... «$8888.... 8.3...d88 82.258288”. .8 8.88» 52 Figure 22. Simple pyroxene quadrilateral including all pyroxene phenocryst compostions including rims, cores and middles. 53 00.00 00.0 00.00 00.00 00.0 00.00 00... 0.0 00.0. 00.0 0... 0.00 E... 0.-0.. 2E 0.-0. 9.8 0.-0. E.. .0.-0. BE .0.-0. 0.8 .-0..0. .000 0.0. .0.00 00.00 00.0 00.00 00.0. 0.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 .000 00.00 .00 00.00 00.00 00.0 00.00 00.0 . 00.0 00.0. 00.0 0... 00.00 .000 00.0 00.00 00.00 00.0 0.00 00.0.. 0.0 .0.0 00.0 00.0 0.00 00.00 00.0 00.00 00.00 00.0 00.00 00.0.. 00.0 .00 00.0 .00 00.00 .000 00.0 00.00 00.00 00.0 0.00 .0.0. . .0 .00 .0.. 00.0 00.00 00.00 00.0 .000 00.00 00.0 00.00 .00. 0.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00. .0 00.00 ....0. 0.00 00.00 00.0 00.00 00.0. 0.0 00.0 0.0 00.0 00.00 00.00 00.0 00.00 00.00 .00 .000 00.0. 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00. .0 00.00 00.0. 00. .0 00.00. 00.0 00. .0 0.0. 00.0 00.0. 00.. 5.0 0.00 00.00 0.0 00. .0 00.00 .00 00. .0 .0.0. 0.0 00.0 0.0 00.0 00..0 00.00 00.0.. 00.0 00.00. 00.0 00. .0 00.0. 00.0 .00. 00.. 0.0 00. .0 00.00 00.0 0.00 00.00. 00.0 00. .0 00.0. 00.0 00.0 00.. 00.0 00.00 E.. 0.0-0. 0.E 0.0-0. 00.00 00... 00.00 00.00 00.0 00. .0 0.0. 00.0 0.0 00.0 00.0 00. .0 00.00 00.0 00. .0 00.00 00.0 00. .0 00.0. 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 0.00 00.00 00. .. 00.00 00.00 00.0 00. .0 0.0. 00.0 0.0 00.0 00.0 00. .0 .0. .0 00.0 ...00 00.00 00.0 .000 5.0. 0.0 00.0 .00 00.0 00.00 8.5 8. 88 .28. 0882 080 085. 08.2 08". no.2 80.. N98 0.8 0-0.0. 0. E00 00.00 00... 00.00 00.00 00.0 00. .0 00.0. 00.0 00.0 0.0 00.0 00. .0 82. 8n. 88 as. 0882 080 08.2 085. 08“. 80.... No... N0.8 E... 0-0-0. EE 0.0.0. 0.00 0.0.0. E.. 0-00-0. 2E 0.00.0. 0.00 0.00.0. E... .-0.0. 2E .00. Boo .-0-0. oEEww 8880.888 899098.... 30.808883cmxo.€38.>.§:ommmom .0 8.280 54 00.00. 0.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 . 0 .0 00.00 00.0. ...0 00.00 E.. 0.00.0. 0.00 0.00.0. E... 0.0.0. 0.00 0.0.0. E...-0-0. 0.00 .-0-0. E...-00-0. 0.8 .-00-0. E... 0.0.0. 0.8 0.0.0. 00.00 0.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00. .. 0.0 00.0. 00.0. 00.0 00.00 00.00. 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0. 00.0 00.0. 0.0. 00.0 00.00 00.00 00.0 00.. .00 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0. 0.0 00. .. 00.0. 5.0 00.00 .000 00.0 00.0 00.0 0.0 00.0 00.0 .00. 00.0 00.0. 00.0. 00.0 .000 H 00.00 0 .0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0. 0 ..0 0.0. 00.0. 00.0 00.00 00.00 0.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00. .. 00.0 .00. 00.0. 00.0 0.00 00.00 0 ...0 .0.. 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00. .. 0 ..0 00.0. 00.0. 00.0 00.00 00.00. 0.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00. .. 0.0 00.00 ...0. .0.0 00.00 0.. .0. 0.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0. 0.0 00.0. 00.0. 00.0 00.00 .20... 8880.888 880596.... $0.85.... 2.8... 303588.08”. .0 8.880 55 used and the resulting temperatures were then determined for each pressure using the calculated end members of the pyroxenes (Table 9). For Group 1 and 2 pyroxenes the lowest average temperatures at which orthopyroxene are in equilibrium with clinopyroxene are at 1 Kb = 1130 °C, at 2 Kb = 1132 °C, at 4 Kb = 1137 °C and at 6 Kb = 1142 °C. Homblende Geobarometry The total aluminum (AlT) content of hornblende is pressure sensitive and can be used as a geobarometer if it is in equilibrium with the assemblage; biotite, plagioclase, sanidine, quartz, sphene, ilmenite or magnetite, melt and possibly vapor (Hammerstrom and Zen, 1986). This method recalculates AlT from hornblende formulas on the basis of 23 oxygens and all iron as FeO. The result is a linear relationship between increasing AlT and increasing pressure. Hammerstrom and Zen (1986) achieved the linear relationship with a correlation coefficient of r2 = 0.8 and an uncertainty of i 3 kb. This correlation coefficient was refined by Hollister et a1. (1987) by analyzing calc-alkaline plutons with intermediate compositions to those used by Hammerstrom and Zen (1986). The result was a r2 = .97 with a reduction in the uncertainty to i 1 kb. Often the correct mineral assemblage, as listed above, is not available to get accurate estimates of pressure. In a study done by Johnson and Rutherford (1989), the correct mineral assemblage was available for pressure estimates. If the correct mineral assemblage is not available, for example if quartz and sanidine are missing, it is possible to do estimates on samples in which the melt contains greater than 76% SiOz and 5% K20 (anhydrous), which are close to quartz and sanidine saturation (Johnson and Rutherford, 1989). The Keetley volcanics are lacking quartz and sanidine as primary phases and it is not possible to determine the 56 8.80.888 c... u . 8.98.88 8.8 u o 0.. 80.. .85. 0 on 08.. .89. 0 .000 00.0 o>> 00.00 00.0 o>> 08 00.. .89. 0 08 00.. .89. 0 0.0. .000 mu. 0.... .000 mu. 0.. 00. . .09. 0 08 00. . .89. 0 0 .. .0 .000 ..m 00.00 .000 cm 08 00. . .89. . 08 00. . .89. . .-xao 0.00.0. x88 8-80-0. 0888.0 o-xao 0-80-0. xao 8-80-0. .8820 85.8.8888... 85888.8. 8.38.8858... 85888.8. 88:98.3 .8. 850.888.88 .mneoeécm 0 8:90 . 95.0 8880.82.88 50.5.8688 cc 8888.. 3.828858... 8:83.363. E80 08.86088 88.28.8868... .0 8.880 57 composition of the melt because of the non-glassy texture of the groundmass. Therefore the estimate of geobarometry should be used with caution. However, The CIPW norm calculations of the Keetley volcanics are very close to the CIPW norm of the Fish Canyon Tuff (Table 10). Therefore, this method at least provides some sort of estimate for pressure estimates at which hornblende was stable. Using the pressure estimate equation from Johnson and Rutherford (1989); P = (4.09 +/- 0.27) (AlT) - (3.29 +/- 0.45), with .2 = .96, the low pressure estimate using AlT = 1.62 is P = 3.35 Kb, the high pressure estimate using AlT = 2.42 is P = 6.61 Kb. The total range of wt.% A1203 in hornblende is from 9.55 % to 14.11 %. Assimilation and Fractional Crystallization Models Table 11 illustrates the results fi’om assimilation and fractional crystallization (AFC) models from the program Mixing (Carr, 1994) after Bryan et al., (1969) in which the sum of the squares of the residuals is calculated by multiple linear regression. The whole rock compositions of the most mafic (18-8 JD) and the most silicic (16-04 Fran, 15- 11 [H and 19-37 JD) end-members were chosen as the mixing magmas. Sample 17-31 was chosen as the hybrid because it has an intermediate compositions. Amphibole, plagioclase and clinopyroxene microprobe analyses from 18-8 JD were chosen as the fractionating phases. Sample 18-8 JD was mixed individually with each of the silicic end- member samples and had fractional crystallization of the mafic phases superimposed on the mixing process. The percents of fractionating phases and amounts of end-members necessary for each combination to produce the hybrid magma are listed in Table 11. 58 Table 10. Comparison of whole rock CIPW norm calculations of the Keetley volcanics vs. the Fish Canyon Tuff. Keetley volcanic samples are those used to calculate hornblende geobarometry. FCT9 17-2|H 19-37 JD 17-13lH QTZ 13.12 14.48 21.60 2.59 OR 23.99 21.03 15.99 20.18 AB 34.19 31.80 34.13 34.55 AN 16.21 16.75 17.66 20.87 DI 1.50 2.26 0.27 6.51 HY 0.00 8.87 5.80 8.18 MT 0.00 2.99 2.92 3.59 ILM 1.14 1.06 1.00 1.86 AP 0.00 0.76 0.64 1.69 59 Table 11. Multiple linear regression models of Assimilation and Fractional Crystallization for the Keetley volcanics. Hybrid lava is 17-31 lH Coef % Cum Mineral or Rock -0.016 -1.616 18-8-3 hbl -0.036 -3.736 18—8—8 plag -0.027 -2.827 18-8-1 cpx 0.426 42.9 18-8 JD 0.646 65.1 16-04 IH Min/Rock Si02 Ti02 A1203 F60 M00 M90 CaO N820 K20 P205 18-8-3 44.01 2.92 11.13 13.53 0.32 14.2 11.72 2.17 0 0 18-8-8 60.58 0 29.12 0 0.49 0 0 9.81 0 0 18-8-1 51.72 2.14 0.37 14.68 8.69 0.48 21.57 0.37 0 0 18-8JD 57.25 0.871843 7.02 0.14 3.04 6.37 3.7 2.65 0.53 16-04IH 65.52 06315.05 4.63 0.06 2.47 4.3 3.72 3.23 0.39 Hybrid 17-31IH Obs-P 62.17 0.66 16.38 5.24 0.1 2.79 4.78 3.76 3.7 0.41 Calc—P 62.4 0.68 16.33 5.37 -0.16 2.65 4.72 3.58 3.21 0.48 Diff‘wt -0.09 -0.01 0.03 -0.12 0.26 0.14 0.06 0.18 0.48 -0.07 Sum of squares of residuals =.387 Hybrid lava is 17-31IH Coef % Cum Min/Rock -0.056 -5.656 18-8-3 hbl -0.024 -2.424 18-8-4 plag -0.022 -2.222 18-8-1 cpx 0.458 46.1 15-11 l-80 0.638 64.2 18-8 JD Si02 Ti02 A|203 F60 Mn0 M90 CaO N820 K20 P205 1883 44.01 2.92 11.13 13.53 0.32 14.2 11.72 2.17 , 0 0 18-8-4 60.86 0 29.03 0 0.54 0 0 9.58 0 0 18-8-1 51.72 2.14 0.37 14.68 8.69 0.48 21.57 0.37 0 0 15—11l- 67.54 0.77 13.37 4.05 0.07 3.41 4 3.09 3.29 0.4 18-8JD 57.25 0.871843 7.02 0.14 3.04 6.37 3.7 2.65 0.53 Hybrid 17-31IH Obs-P 62.17 0.66 16.38 5.24 0.1 2.79 4.78 3.76 3.7 0.41 Cale-P 62.39 0.7 16.55 5.26 -0.1 2.7 4.77 3.42 3.19 0.52 Diff‘vvt -0.09 -0.04 -0.08 -0.01 0.2 0.1 0.01 0.34 0.5 -0.11 Sum of squares of the residuals = .446 60 Table 11 (cont) Hybrid lava 17-31 lH Coef %Cum Min/Rock -0.007 -0.707 18-8-3 hbl -0.098 -9.998 18-8-4 plag -0.041 -4.141 18-8-1 cpx 0.518 52.4 18-8 JD 0.617 62.4 19-37 JD Sample Si02 Ti02 Al203 F60 Mn0 M90 18-8-3 44.01 2.92 11.13 13.53 0.32 18-8-4 60.86 0 29.03 0 0.54 1881 51.72 2.14 0.37 14.68 8.69 18-8JD 57.25 0.871843 7.02 0.14 19-37JD 66.6 05316.07 3.87 0.05 Hybrid 17-31IH Obs-P 62.17 0.66 16.38 5.24 0.1 Calc-P 62.39 0.67 16.53 5.34 -0.31 Diff‘wt -0.09 -0.01 -0.07 -0.09 0.41 Sum of squares of the residuals = .749 14.2 0 0.48 3.04 1.85 2.79 2.6 0.19 11.72 0 21 .57 6.37 4 4.78 4.81 .o_03 2.17 9.58 0.37 3.7 4.04 3.76 3.45 0.31 080 N620 K20 0 0 0 2.65 2.71 3.7 3.04 0.65 P205 0 0 0 0.53 0.28 0.41 0.45 -0.03 DISCUSSION Chemical and Age Relationships Between the Keetley Volcanics and the Wasatch Intrusive Belt Overall there are three and possibly four main chemical groups that characterize the Wasatch Intrusive Belt and the Keetley volcanics (V ogel, in preparation, 1997). The Little Cottonwood stock ranges in silica from 65% to 73%, the Alta stock is intermediate ranging from 60% to 68% silica, and the Clayton Peak stock is the most mafic ranging from 54%-62% silica and they have distinct Rb/Sr - oxide trends. The chemical compositions of the eastern stocks are distinctly different fi'om the Little Cottonwood and Clayton Peak stocks but do have similarities to the Alta stock (Figure 23). The Keetley volcanics are variable but have similarities to the eastern stocks and the Alta stock (Figure 24). The eastern stocks and the Keetley volcanics have biotite K/Ar ages of about 34 Ma. The Alta stock has a zircon U/Pb age of 33.5 Ma. The similarities in the chemical composition and emplacement ages of the Alta stock, eastern stocks and the Keetley volcanics are interpreted to mean that they may be genetically related. Detailed zircon U/Pb (Constenius, pers. comm.,l996), and 40Ar/39Ar dating of minerals (Flood, pers. comm, 1996) are in progress to evaluate this suggestion, and to firrther document the emplacement history and petrologic relationships among the Wasatch intrusive belt. Evaluation of the effects of Pm on the evolution of the Keetley Volcanics Change in pressure can account for the breakdown of hornblende in the Keetley volcanics. The presence of hornblende in disequilibrium in the majority of the samples 61 62 .m 2=wE 5 mm 2:9. 05 2a 308m 5063 2... 3m asap—Sm .mxoSw 583m 05 3 $83 6835:0533 9.8% 8833 05.3 3028888 .8585 230 comm—3:80 .m~ 253m n od rd 53¢ Nd 1 Md 1 v.0 om oov com r con i hN oov r com I 53m 092 63 .o 9:55 E 8 2:8 05 8: 8:82? 6:03— 2: 8.: «698$ noise—o.» 6:03— 2: 3 A32: :28 women—Etoasmv 8.8% 8883 05 .3 80:66:68 32620 05 .«o samba—Eco .vm Semi o.o to 63: No 63: no so 8: 8” Sn r .N 022 64 implies that there is a minimum H20 content and pressure that allows growth of hornblende in the magma. The presence of very-fine grained pyroxenes nucleated around reacted homblendes as well as microphenocrysts of pyroxene in the matrix suggests that hornblende became unstable while pyroxene became stable. In general as the amount of H20 in a silicate melt decreases the stability of hydrous phases such as amphibole decreases (Eggler, 1972). An experimental study by Johnson and Rutherford (1989) on the Fish Canyon Tufl‘ indicates that at 2 kb hornblende becomes unstable with less than .25 Xmo. They found that for the Fish Canyon Tufi‘, in order for amphibole to be stable at Pm. =2 kb Xmo must be between .25 and .75. P, T and Xmocan be roughly estimated from hornblende instability. In calc-alkaline melts it appears that the upper temperature stability limit of amphibole for any firgacity of H20 in the fluid may represent either incongruent melting of the amphibole or a reaction to clinopyroxene (Eggler, 1972). Because of the calc-alkaline nature of the Keetley volcanics and the fact that many of the samples contain hornblende phenocrysts rimmed by clinopyroxene, this may represent a reaction controlled by the magma moving out of the stability field of hornblende and into the stability field of pyroxene by a lowering of the Pm” in the magma as it ascended. The P, T and X mo conditions under which this process occurred may be estimated to be between 930 °C and about 760 °C at 2 kb and below .25 an following the experimental data of Johnson and Rutherford (1989). Reverse Zoning in Plagioclase The Keetley volcanics contain a significant population of reverse zoned plagioclase phenocrysts. There are two possible explanations for this feature. One is that 65 an increase in pressure followed by a drop in pressure caused the rims of the plagioclase crystals to be more anorthitic than the inner parts of the crystal. This is caused by the fact that anorthite is more stable at elevated pressures than albite is. As a magma evolves under ideal conditions, one would expect to see the zoning of plagioclase become less anorthitic toward the rim. However, if there are cyclic increases and decreasses in pressure as one would expect to see in a volcanic system, increasing pressure results in more anorthitic rich composition of the plagioclase grains that are crystallizing (Figure 25). Another explanation for reverse zoning in plagioclase is magma mixing. The invasion of a more anorthitic magma into the magma chamber could also result in reverse zoning of plagioclase crystals. The variation from A1130 to Aug of the rims of the plagioclase phenocrysts as well as the variation from A1142 to Arm in the matrix plagioclase ‘ means that the not all of the plagioclase was in equilibrium with the same magma. The intrusion of a more mafic magma could have produced more anorthic rims on some of the plagioclase. Also, a more mafic magma could introduce other plagioclase grains with different rim compositions to the original magma. The fact that there is more than a bimodal distribution in anorthite compositions of the plagioclase rims implies that there is not a simple binary mixing cure. Instead there was probably more than one magmatic source involved. The anorthite variation within the rims and the matrix plagioclase could also be the result of changes in pressure as discussed above. It is difficult to distinguish between these two processes to explain the cause of reverse zoned plagioclase. The results of AFC modeling are consistent with magma mixing (see below) and therefore it is quite possible that the reverse zoning of the plagioclase is due to magma mixing. 66 Figure 25. Theoretical plagioclase feldspar phase diagram illustrating the effects of varying pressure, where P2>P1>P3. 67 Evaluation of Petrologic processes to Produce the Chemical Variation within the Keetley Volcanics; Fractional Crystallization, Magma Mixing, and Crustal Assimilation Magma mixing, wall rock assimilation and fractional crystallization are all processes that can affect the chemical compositions of magmas. Tests of petrologic processes can be used to determine if the data set is consistent or inconsistent with a particular model but do not prove that a particular process is the cause of the chemical variation (Vogel, 1982). It is probable that more than one of these processes operates simultaneously resulting in complicated chemical trends to explain. Each of these processes are evaluated and are considered as possibilities for the chemical variation within the Keetley volcanics. Major and trace elements are used to evaluate these processes. Figure 26 shows the Keetley volcanics with two typical calc-alkaline differentiation trends of calc-alkaline rocks. The Keetley volcanics do not follow this typical trend and there is little coherence in the data array. Chemical compositions of the Keetley volcanics show significant scatter and can not be separated into different petrologic or chemical groups. Therefore it is very likely that more than one petrologic process has affected the Keetley volcanics. Whether or not magma mixing , assimilation or fractional crystallization or a combination of one or more of these processes have affected the evolution of the Keetley volcanics is a difficult question to answer directly because there is so little coherency in the data. However, these processes were evaluated and compared to other calc-alkaline suites of rocks. 68 FeO v v v v V v J v y Na20+K20 M90 Figure 26. Typical differentiation trends of calc-alkaline rocks erupted within continental crust, l is for Lassen Peak, northern California and 2 is for Crater Lake National Park, Oregon (Hyndman, 1985 and references within). The Keetley volcanics clearly do not follow the typical calc-alkaline differentiation trend. Symbols for Keetley volcanics are the same as in Figure 6. 69 Fractional Crystallization One mechanism for differentiation to produce andesites is by fi'actional crystallization of a basalt parent, typically of plagioclase, orthopyroxene, amphibole and magnetite (Gill, 1981). Statistical models of fi'actionation were tested and all were unsuccessfirl, and cannot alone provide an explanation for the chemical variation within the Keetley volcanics. Even smaller linear trends that occur within the entire data array could not be modeled by fiactionation. Clearly, linear trends within the total data set obviously are not trends produced by crystal fractionation. There is also no petrographic evidence of fiactional crystallization, for example there are no accumulations of any phenocrysts phases that seem to account for any variations in the chemistry such as plagioclase accumulation, which would result in an overall increase in Sr. The MELTS program (Ghiorso and Sack, 1995) was used to try to estimate amounts and compositions of various fractionating phases over a temperature range of 1200°C to 900°C. The significant abundance of hornblende precludes the use of MELTS program because it does not include hornblende as a fractionating phase in its calculations. In a typical fi'actionated sequence of calc-alkaline andesites one would expect to see near linear or curvilinear trends with little scatter within most major and trace element chemical trends. Figure 27a-d illustrates the chemical composition of the Keetley volcanics with recent analyses fi'om calc-alkaline rocks of the Mogollon-Datil Volcanic Field, New Mexico thought to be produced by fractionation (Davis and Hawkesworth, 1994). Notice the tight linear arrays for the Mogollon-Datil volcanics compared to the large variation within the Keetley volcanics (Figure 27a-d). There must be more than one 70 Figure 27a-d. Comparison of a typical calc-alkaline fiactionation trend (shaded areas) from the Mogollon-Datil volcanic field with the Keetley volcanics. Symbols for Keetley volcanics are the same as in Figure 6. 71 a) Si0 b) 70 55 CaO 5— SiO 72 G) 70 SK) d) 70 3000 55 Ba 2000 - 1000 SK) 73 process afi‘ecting the petrogenesis of the Keetley volcanics, rather than simply one process such as fractional crystallization. Magma Mixing There are many documented cases of mixing a basalt with rhyolite or dacite to produce intermediate magmas such as andesites in several volcanic systems. Examples of this are the Coso volcanic field (Bacon and Metz, 1984), and the Medicine Lake Volcano (Grove et al., 1988). In both of these cases there is evidence of a hybrid magma including relict phenocrysts from both the mafic and felsic components (Bacon and Metz, 1984), as well as melted crustal xenoliths and reacted, resorbed and overgrown phenocrysts and xenocrysts (Grove et al., 1988). The Keetley volcanics show some evidence of mixing. Reacted and partially resorbed phenocrysts of hornblende are common but are believed to have resulted from lowering of pressure as the magma ascended, as discussed above. Mixing of basalt and silicic magma to produce an andesite, and eruption prior to re- equilibration of a hybrid magma can produce some of the same features, such as reacted phenocrysts, as does increasing Pmo in a magma (Halsor and Rose, 1991). The Keetley volcanics also contain reverse zoned plagioclase phenocrysts which are probably the result of magma mixing. Assimilation and Fractional Crystallization All attempts at modeling magma mixing, or fractional crystallization as sole processes using multiple linear regression with the available end-members were unsuccessful. Magma mixing or fractional crystallization alone can not explain the chemical variation within the Keetley volcanics. However, combinations of crystal 74 fractionation and magma mixing within the available end members resulted in statistically acceptable values. In these models acceptable results would include the sum of the squares of the residuals being low, generally less than 1, the r2 values being close to one and the mixing coefficients being geologically reasonable, meaning that the mixing and fractionating values have to be consistent with geologic and petrologic data (V ogel, 1982). In order to produce the intermediate, hybrid lava 17-31 IH a combination of 42.9% mafic end-member plus 65.1% silicic end-member with fractionation of 1.6% hornblende, 3.7% plagioclase and 2.8% clinopyroxene from the mafic end-member result in a sum of the squares of the residuals = .387. This combination of mixing and crystal fractionation permits the AFC model as a possible explanation for the some of the chemical variation within the Keetley volcanics. Similar results with the sum of the squares of the residuals < 1 are reproducible using other silicic end-members (Table 11.). However, this model does not prove that AFC alone caused the chemical variation. Quartz and rare K-feldspar xenocrysts as well as possible xenoliths are found in some of the samples, these may indicate assimilation of a silicic granitoid crust. It is not possible to determine if the quartz and k-feldspar xenocrysts are the result of small pieces of a granitoid contaminant being included or if they represent relict parts of large amounts of incorporation of a granitoid that has been significantly melted (Lange and Carmichael, 1996). Therefore, even if there was contamination by a granitoid body through assimilation, it is not possible to estimate the amount of assimilation of such a contaminant. However, the rare occurrence and the resorbed, embayed texture of the quartz grains suggest that they are xenocrysts. Whether or not what appear to be xenoliths are actually xenoliths is difficult to determine because they have very similar 75 mineralogy to the Keetley volcanics, therefore they may just be aggregates of minerals from within the magma. Origin of high-K calc-alkaline rocks and a Possible Petrogenetic Model for the Evolution of the Keetley Volcanics There are two main tectonic settings in which high-K calc-alkaline rocks may be produced. One tectonic setting is a continental arc system and the other is a post collisional setting. The chemical and isotopic characteristics of magmas in an continental arc setting are believed to be the products of partial melting in the mantle wedge which is induced by incompatible element enriched fluids derived from a subducting slab. Subsequent to this the magmas rise to the continental crust and are firrther enriched in incompatible elements through assimilation (Roberts and Clemens, 1993). The amount of ‘ enrichment in incompatible elements from the crust is attributed to the thickness of the crust as well as the depth to the BeniotT zone. The thicker the crust that the magma must pass through the more enriched in incompatibles it will become (Dickenson, 1975). Crustal contamination of the mantle derived parent magma will produce characteristic trace element and isotopic signatures, such as those examined in the classic continental are setting of the Andes (Hildreth and Moorbath, 1988). A second tectonic model for the origin of high-K calc-alkaline rocks is in post collisional settings (Pitcher, 1987 in Roberts and Clemens, 1993). Melting of the source rock occurs by interaction of mantle melts with the crust. Extension following thickening would then allow mantle upwelling and underplating of the lower crust by mantle derived mafic magmas (Sonder et al., 1987). The extra heat added to an already hot crust would 76 allow for partial melting to take place and these melts could then ascend through the crust (Sonder et al., 1987, Dewey, 1984). By Late Cretaceous time the western Cordillera had developed into an Andean type continental margin arc system, which produced mantle melts by the continuous subduction of the Farallon plate ( Miller et al., 1992 and references therein). The relative rate of convergence between the Farallon plate and the North American plate increased between 75 and 70 Ma, continued fi'om 65 to 55 Ma and began to decline between 55 and 40 Ma (Engebretson 1985). This slowing of convergence rate is attributed to a shallowing in subduction of the Farallon plate (Miller, 1992, and references therein). The timing of compressional vs. extensional regimes in the Cordillera is related to the idea of migrating arc-magmatism (Coney and Reynolds, 1977). Migration of the magmatic arc in the southern Rocky Mountains is related to Late Cretaceous - Early Tertiary crustal shortening and simultaneous shallowing of the angle of subduction of the Farallon plate beneath North America (Coney and Reynolds, 1977). Constenius (1996) has recently reviewed the timing of the change from convergence to extension within the Cordillera. Based on ages of magmatism and basin formation, Constenius (1996) has suggested that during the Late Cretaceous to Early Eocene (72-54 Ma) accelerated subduction and/or shallowing of the subducting Farallon plate were occurring simultaneously with about 600 km of eastward progression of magmatism in the Cordillera. In the early-middle Eocene (53-51 Ma) there was a reduced rate of plate convergence, and steepening of the slab, resulting in westward migration and rollback. This caused widespread magmatism. In the middle Eocene (49-48 Ma) the onset of 77 normal faulting and basin-fill sedimentation in the Cordillera thrust belt was related to the westward movement of the Farallon plate from the Great Plains toward the Pacific coast. The normal faults superimposed half grabens on the deformed Cordillera thrust belt (Constenius, 1996). The Uinta lineament was reactivated during the compressional stages of the Sevier and Laramide orogenies, which lasted from 145 Ma to 50 Ma overall. The onset of the change from compression to extension in the western US. began as a result of rollback of the Farallon plate (49—48 Ma), which in turn resulted in a thermal weakening of the crust (Constenius, 1996). The position of the subducted slab and the thermal state of the slab at 50, 35, 30, 20, 10 and 0 Ma were estimated by Severinghaus and Atwater (1990) based on magnetic anomalies, the time since subduction, and age of the slab upon entry into the trench. Based on these estimates Severinghaus and Atwater (1990) have concluded that by 35 Ma the subducted slab had been shortened along its entire length. This shortening or rollback of the slab is probably recorded by the westward sweep of magmatism in the western US. noted by Coney and Reynolds, ( 1977) and Cross and Pilger (1978). Cross and Pilger (1978) also suggest that the Farallon plate may have disassembled by breaking off into pieces during the rollback. The model proposed by Cross and Pilger (1978) of the rollback of the Farallon plate is illustrated in Figure 28. This figure illustrates the different stages of convergence of the North American plate and the Farallon plate and diagrams the break-up and roll-back of the subducted slab. It is possible that the Wasatch intrusive belt and Keetley volcanics are a result of the steepening and rollback of the Farallon plate. The Uinta lineament was reactivated 78 Figure 28. Stages of change in the angle of subduction of the Farallon plate and varying rates of convergence of the North American plate from 150 Ma to the present. Figure is modified from Cross and Pilger (1978). 79 ———> i f——o 2 sauna spec" 150-» mm \ . , +__. M l“so-Arc mm \\ i ‘ ———> 1' t S H 4o-3o mar \ \ C1_LLH H fit‘%\ : so-zo mar $l® «+54»- M «ll 1“" (2...; t—l—l—hl—l KIOMETEI PACIFIC 80 during the Sevier and Laramide orogenies. This linear weakness facilitated the emplacement of magmas related to the rollback of the Farallon plate to rise into the crust, beginning furthest east at 50 Ma and reaching Utah between 40 and 30 Ma. According to Severinghaus and Atwater (1990) at about 35 Ma the Farallon plate was steepening and rolling back underneath the western US, including north central Utah. Given the ages of the Wasatch intrusive belt and Keetley volcanics of around 34 Ma it is possible that the mantle derived magmas triggered by this process subsequently became buoyant and ascended into the Uinta lineament and formed the Wasatch intrusive belt. Roberts and Clemens, (1993) evaluated a model for the origin and production of high-K calc-alkaline rocks such as the Keetley volcanics. They determined that partial melts from hydrated, meta-calc—alkaline and high-K calc-alkaline andesites and basaltic andesites are the most suitable source for producing high-K calc~alkaline rocks. The melts produced from these source rocks fall directly within the high-K calc-alkaline trend (Roberts, and Clemens, 1993, Beard and Lofgren, 1991). The presence of high-K calc- alkaline rocks therefore implies that there is a source of andesite at depth that is large enough to supply a melt. Partial melting of mafic to intermediate source compositions with H20 contents between 0.7%and 1.6% have predicted volumes of generated melt between 30% and 60% at T= 900°C-950°C and P= 5-10 Kbar for fluid absent source rocks (Clemens, 1990; in Roberts and Clemens, 1993) . The high volume of melt produced in these conditions precludes the need for fluids derived from elsewhere such as a subducting slab, to generate large enough volumes of melt that may move towards the surface (Roberts and Clemens, 1993). 81 A possible model for the evolution of the Keetley volcanics and Wasatch intrusive belt is that they were produced by partial melting of previously emplaced or underplated calc-alkaline rocks, which were related to subduction of the Farallon plate. These melts were subsequently emplaced along the Wasatch-Uinta lineament, which was a conduit along which these magmas could have been emplaced. A model of Cambray et al. (1993) may be applicable to the emplacement of the Wasatch intrusives. This model would invlove the development of releasing steps along larger normal faults within the Uinta lineament. These releasing steps could provide space for independent magmas to occur. Conclusions The purpose of this thesis was to determine the relationships between the Keetley volcanics and the Wasatch intrusive belt as well as to determine the cause of the chemical variation within the Keetley volcanics. The Keetley volcanics, the Alta stock and the eastern stocks have similar emplacement ages ranging from 33.5 - 34 Ma as well as similar chemical compositions. This suggests that these igneous bodies may have a genetic relationship. The main conclusions from this thesis are the following. The Keetley volcanics have a significant variation in their chemical composition and this variation cannot be explained by fractional crystallization or magma mixing as separate processes acting independently. AFC models, however, permit magma mixing and crystal fiactionation to produce an intermediate magma composition from mixing the most mafic and felsic end- members with simultaneous fractionation of amphibole, plagioclase and clinopyroxene from the mafic end-member. These models are reproducible using different end-members 82 from within the higher silica end with the most mafic end-member. The occurrence of reverse zoned plagioclase and quartz and K-feldspar xenocrysts are geologic evidence that some mixing/assimilation occurred. The Keetley volcanics were most likely derived from partial melting of previously emplaced or underplated calc-alkaline rocks. The Uinta lineament is a weakness in the crust that was reactivated during the Laramide and Sevier orogenies. It is the conduit along which magma ascended to form the Wasatch intrusive belt and the Keetley volcanics. The rollback or break up of the Farallon plate is thought to have produced mantle melts which ascended to the crust causing melting of previously emplaced calc- alkaline rocks. The Uinta lineament acted as a conduit for the magmas to ascend further into the crust where the Wasatch intrusive belt and Keetley volcanics resulted. Upon ascent through the continental crust the magma underwent differentiation as well as assimilation and mixing resulting in a very diverse chemical composition for the Keetley volcanics. APPENDICES APPENDIX A Appendix A. XRF detection limits for trace elements and statistics for major elelments analyzed from glass disks. Element Detection limit (ppmflIMajor Oxide TrMean (wt.%) Std. Dev. Ba 100l|sro2 52.73 0.106 La 48]]Ti02 1.08 0.009 Cr 63IIA1203 15.02 0.077 Ni 25lIFeO 9.99 0.030 Zn 14IIMnO 0.18 0.004 Rb 13flM99 6.63 0.018 Sr 12|[CaO 10.91 0.014 Y 14][Na203 2.18 0.018 Nb 1511190 ' 0.64 0.003 Zr 14||r>205 0.14 0.005 83 APPENDIX B 0N. 0 V. 0 30. 0 VV. 0 30. 0 V0.0 NV. 0 0V0 5N.0 50.0 0N0 N00 5N. 0 V0.0 V0.0 0.0 0N. 0 V0.0 NV. 0 0V0 5N0 50.0 0N0 N0.0 5N. 0 V0.0 V0.0 0.0 0N0 00Nn. 00.N 5N0 50.N N00 0V.0 03.0 5V.0 00V 3N. 0 VV. 0 3.0 50.0 30.0 0V. V 00. 3 VVN 50.N 0 3.0 5V.0 00V N. 0 VV. 0 3. 0 50.0 30.0 0V.V 00. 3 V. N 50. N 0Nv. ..N.V 50.0 00.0 50.0 50.N 30.N 05. 0 00 0 50. 0 5.0 5. 0 V0.0 0. 0 50.N 0.0 05.0 0.0 30.N 05. 0 00. 0 50. 0 5. 0 5.0 V0.0 0.0 50. N 0. 0 05. 0 0. 0 ONmz 0N.0 00.0 N0.V VN.0 50.V N0.V 05. V N. V 00. V 05.V 0N. V N. 0 3.V :0 No.0 00.V N0.V N0.V 05V NNV 00.V 05V 0N. V N. 0 3.V 3V.0 N00 00V N0.V 000 0N0 00.0 00V 00.53 00.0 V.30 00-.V3.03 00.0 50.0 00V 0N.03 55.0 03.50 00.. 3 3.03 03.0 00. 0 30. V 50.03 00.0 5.N0 00.0.03 00V 3. 0 00. 0 53.03 00.0 33. 30 00.003 V5.N 3.0 00. 0 3V.03 05.0 03.00 3.05.... 00.V 00.0 00. V 0V.03 30.3 00.00 m0 ...0 5.... N03 50.0 V0.0 00.03 30.0 V0.00 <0 30 5.5 55.0 3.0 50. V 0.3 00.3 00. 30 N305... 50.3 00.0 N0.V 00.03 . 00.0 35.00 0305.5 00.N 3.0 0V0 V3.03 35.0 VN.00 0.0 5.... 00. N 00.0 3V.V V0.03 50.0 N000 0.0 5.... N. V 00.0 03.0 30.3 00.3 0N.00 50 5.5 5V. 3 00. 0 NV.V 0N.03 50.0 3.V0 0.05.... 00. V 3. 0 0N0 00.03 00.3 5.50 V05... V0.0 00. 0 00.0 05.53 05.0 0V.50 0.0 5.... 5.3 50. 0 N0 00.03 00.0 N0.N0 N0 5.... 00.3 00. 0 00V 00.03 35.0 55.N0 3.0 5.... 00V 00. 0 00. V 0V.03 30.3 00.00 00 3.0 5.5 N0.3 50.0 V0.0 00.03 30.0 V0.00 <0 30 5.... 55.0 33.0 50. V 0.3 00.3 00. 30 N305... 50.3 00.0 N0.V 00.03 00.0 35.00 03.0 5.... 00.N 33.0 0V0 V3.03 35.0 VN.00 0.0 30.... 00. N 00.0 3V.V V0.03 50.0 N000 0-0 5.... N. V 00.0 03.0 30.3 00.3 0N.00 5.0 5.... 5V. 3 00. 0 NV.V 0N.03 50.0 3.V0 0.05.... 00. V 3. 0 0N0 00.03 00.3 5.50 V0 5.... V0.0 00. 0 00.0 05.53 05.0 0V.50 0.0 5.... 5.3 50. 0 N0 00.03 00.0 N0.N0 N0 5.... 00.3 00. 0 00V 00.03 35.0 55.N0 305.5 00.2 052 Own. 00N.< N0... N90 n 0.0500 033.5 32605 02.8 8.2: ...Ex x62 22.3 .N 032. 84 30.0 30.0 0N.0 00.0 00.0 30.0 50. 0 0. 0 0N. 0 00. 0 V0. 0 V0.0 V. 0 VV. 0 N0. 0 0V.0 0V. 0 V0. 0 00. 0 V0. 0 V0.0 00.0 5N.0 N00 5N.0 5N.0 00.0 0N0 N0. 0 V0. 0 30. 0 00.V 0V.N 05.N 05. N 0V. N VN. 0 30. 0 VV. 0 00. 0 50. N 0V. 3 NN.V 35.0 0V. 0 0. N 00. 0 00.V 3V. 0 N. 0 00. 0 00.V 00.0 3.0 05.N N3. 0 0. 0 N5. N 00.N 0V.N 00. N 0. N 0.N 30.0 50. V 3. V 30. 0 30.0 00.0 5N.0 05. 0 00. 0 50. 0 V0. 0 30. 0 0. 0 V0.0 00.0 00. N N. 0 03. 0 V0. N 03. 0 N00 03.0 05.0 0N0 5N.0 00.0 N00 N3.V N00 30.V V. 0 00. V 00. V N5.V 30.V 05.0 00.V No.0 00.V 00.V 3N.0 00.V V5. V 0. V 0N0 30.V 5.V 00.0 NN.0 30.V 00.V N0. V V0. V 00. V 35.V N0.V 50.V 00.V N0.V 00.0 00.V N00 30. 3 00. 3 N0. N V5.N 05.N 00.N 35.0 VN.N 50.0 00.N 30.N V5.N 00.N 05.N 5V. V 00. 0 0N. 0 V. 0 V.V 05.N 00.0 00.N 50.0 00.0 0N.3 N03 3. N 0. 0 50. N 00. 0 00. 0 00. 0 00. 0 50. 0 N30 00. 0 3. 0 00. 0 50.0 33.0 50.0 33.0 33.0 3.0 30 N30 3. 0 3. 0 00. 0 N30 00. 0 3. 0 00. 0 00. 0 3. 0 V0.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 V5. V 0. 0 00. 0 30.V 00.0 0N0 05.V 00. V 0N. V 30. 0 00. V 0. 0 00. 0 0. 0 0N. 0 05. V 00. 0 00. 0 00.V 0V. V 00. V 0N. 0 0N0 N0. 0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 V0.V N0.V 03V 0N.V3 NV.03 03.03 V03 00.03 00.53 0.3 0N.03 03.03 00.03 0.03 00.3 00.03 05.03 33.03 3V.03 V.V3 00.03 03.03 V0.03 0V.V3 V0.03 55.03 0V.03 00.03 0.03 00.53 5.03 00.53 0.03 V5.03 00.3 V0.0 00. 0 5. 0 V0.0 00.0 30. 0 00. 0 00. 0 00.0 05.0 50.0 00. 0 5. 0 00.0 00.0 00.0 05.0 00.0 05.0 00.3 00. 0 5. 0 05. 0 5. 0 5.0 00. 0 0. 0 00. 0 50.0 00.0 00.00 00.V0 50.50 N000 03.V0 3N.00 00.00 00.N0 00.V0 N500 0N.00 V0.00 00.00 0.00 5N.00 00. 30 00. 30 05. 30 50. 30 50.N0 00.00 N.V0 00.N0 3.3.0 0300 5. 30 0.V0 00.00 00.00 5N.N0 N000 000.03 0.403 0050.03 0000.03 0.:N003 000N03 000 3.03 000 3.03 005.03 0000.03 D..N.03 0.. 3.03 030.03 020.03 000.03 000N-53 Own. 30.0 3 Own.0N.0 3 Omn.5N.03 Omn.V3.03 OmaN30 3 .(Kn.0 3-0N .53.“. 3 3.0N Z